filename,text
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028055.txt,"One night’s massacre would have been enough to produce the outcry that
resulted once the first news reports, photos and TV pictures were sent around
the world. That the bloodletting was allowed to continue after we knew what
was going on, beyond the cost in innocent lives, made the fallout even worse. In
Israel, the response was unlike anything in the past. There had been some
opposition to the war: from parts of Labor, from political groups further to the
left and particularly the pressure group Peace Now, formed in 1978 to protest
the Begin government’s obvious desire to use the peace with Egypt as a means
to limit, rather than actively explore, prospects for a wider agreement with the
Palestinians.

After Sabra and Shatila, Peace Now was the driving force behind demands
for an inquiry into the Israeli role into what had happened. But the trauma went
deeper. Israelis of all political stripes jammed shoulder-to-shoulder into the
Kings of Israeli Square in the heart of Tel Aviv a week after the massacre.
There were soldiers, too: 20somethings back from the fighting and reservists a
decade or more older. Some estimates put the size of the crowd at as many as
400,000, almost ten percent of the population of Israel at the time. The protest
was nominally aimed at forcing the government to empower a commission of
inquiry, which it did a couple of days later. But the mood in the square was
more like an outpouring of shock and shame. While the catalyst was the
massacre in the camps, it tapped into a rumble of growing questions, and
doubts, about the war itself, which had been building ever since the prolonged
siege of west Beirut: what the invasion was for, how it had been planned and
prosecuted, and what it said about our country, our government and our armed
forces.

I was at home with Nava, watching the coverage of the demonstration on
television. I shared the protesters’ view that an inquiry was needed. In the days
since my phone call to Tsila Drori, ’'d remained troubled not just by our failure
to stop the killings once we knew what was going on, but by the response from
Begin, Arik and some other ministers to the massacre. Determined to shift the
blame and responsibility elsewhere, they kept driving home the point that it was
Phalangists, not Israelis, who had carried out the killings. That was true. But it
could not erase the failures of judgment and control on our part. We were the
ones who had allowed them into the camps. Our forces were deployed around
the perimeter. And the killers were our “Lebanese Christian allies”.

The formal picking-apart of Israel’s share of responsibility would be the job
of the inquiry commission. I did take some heart from the very fact such large

207
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028055
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021034.txt,"Though Entitlements Are Structural, Not a Cyclical Problem,

Entitlement Outlays Go Up with High Unemployment

Real Entitlement Spending Y/Y Growth & Unemployment Rates, 1962 - 2009

Bp EET me = mm mem me = me mm mt = i = =
6 —— Real Entitlement Spending Y/Y
wo
“ —— Unemployment Rate
= BY wes - eee ces ce eo ome cof oss cegI ceo posts mec com mest — mum tes GS REM! — mR RS Gem BT mR ee ae hale
E
~ ~
2 x
S 1g ~~ -
@ \
> 1
8 !
= 8% oN ’
D 4
£ ?
=
£ 0% . T T T T T T T T Fe T T T 1
”
5
£ 86% Correlation Between 1986 & 2009
a
<
Lu
rs]
wo
GIG wm — me me = me ce = kt
1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006
Note: Real spending adjusted for inflation. Fiscal year ends in September. Source: White House Office of Management &
K P Budget, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 385

Increase Employment —

High-Level Policy Options to Consider

Short-run options:

1) Payroll tax holiday and/or

2) Employment tax credit and/or

3) Job training and/or
)

4) Restore labor mobility by reducing housing imbalances

Medium- to long-run options:
1) Reduce employer health care costs and/or

2) Improve vocational training/education and/or

3) Encourage inward foreign direct investment, “onshoring”
which would increase domestic employment

KP Source: Richard Berner, “Employment Prospects and Policies to Improve Them’ (2/26/10), Morgan Stanley Research.
(@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 386

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021034
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025403.txt,"Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2019-02-03\ 
on 2018-12-03 at 08.29.43.ichat 
Service: iMessage 
Start Time: 11/29/18 08:43:11 AM (565202591) 
End Time: 02/03/19 08:20:29 AM (570903629) 
Last Message ID: 24696 
Chat Room: 
Participants: jee, 1111 
Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com, 
Messages - 
Sender: 
Time: 11/29/18 08:43:11 AM (565202591) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: E5C8C101-BAA0-497F-90C0-E28945446555 
Message: Can't believe she cancelled 00 
Sender: 
Time: 11/30/18 09:48:04 AM (565292884) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7EF041E1-A82C-449C-9146-14FD7911A7D7 
Message: H 0 
Sender: 
Time: 12/01/18 07:50:50 AM (565372250) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: B22EF361-F1DC-4EA5-A6FF-015507F9F365 
Message: Are you here?? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 12/01/18 07:52:01 AM (565372321) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8F3B419D-69A2-451D-AF58-9FB4156652CD 
Message: yes 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025403 
Sender: 
Time: 12/01/18 07:56:51 AM (565372611) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 32B803AC-3694-416F-AAEF-FAEF8COD980B 
Message: What are you doing tonight? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 12/01/18 01:35:01 PM (565392901) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2467C890-4E89-46CF-B3AD-0642D7A28B64 
Message: <Unsupported Message Content> 
Sender: 
Time: 12/01/18 07:29:13 PM (565414153) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 0E0A925B-ACB9-4F2E-8EAA-6C6A686CAF46 
Message: I can't walk now00 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 12/02/18 03:14:47 AM (565442087) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: FFCCF5A7-EACF-478D-8374-82743CCF0C49 
Message: swollen? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 12/02/18 03:31:15 AM (565443075) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: C4F7813E-OODA-47E1-BF45-5B8C65179A93 
Message: hope its not a tear 
Sender: 
Time: 12/02/18 06:18:13 AM (565453093) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025404 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2489B044-4D81-44C3-836F-692951FC3F89 
Message: Not swollen just so painful to walk... Did you fly to Boston? 
Sender: 
Time: 12/02/18 08:12:04 AM (565459924) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: B5448931-D3A3-48FB-96CC-58FCOOD0215D 
Message: <Unsupported Message Content> 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 12/02/18 08:12:39 AM (565459959) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 52EFAC88-1CC4-4BCC-9B21-8D2F563D6D22 
Message: Ot 
Sender: 
Time: 12/02/18 03:59:31 PM (565487971) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2C8B0186-E67D-49C3-8B01-E238089E28D9 
Message: Did you land? My foot is better00 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 12/02/18 03:59:52 PM (565487992) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: E5DBCA8A-1770-4DA2-BEE7-OFFE1FDE6D85 
Message: Soon, im glad 
Sender: 
Time: 12/03/18 05:26:08 AM (565536368) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025405 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8BF63F04-1947-4BB4-A4DD-A52A5ED1AFE4 
Message: It will all blow over! They're really just trying to take down Trump and doing 
whatever they can to do that...! 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 12/03/18 05:26:45 AM (565536405) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 736A2116-F9FE-43F1-9AD4-F3DA7A377DB8 
Message: yes thx. 
its wild. because i am the one able to take him down 0 
Sender: 
Time: 12/03/18 05:29:43 AM (565536583) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: CC8B1143-3BFE-4C77-928B-CA8B56BFA58C 
Message: 
Sender: 
Time: 02/03/19 07:34:40 AM (570900880) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 70A4EFA2-A811-4A8D-9B93-B759D24303C6 
Message: Where are you?? We are in Georgia... 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/03/19 07:34:55 AM (570900895) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 3D9F243F-7C45-45FC-BECC-3523AD089717 
Message: nyc 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/03/19 07:35:00 AM (570900900) 
Flags: 1150981 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: AD6876C2-BC7D-4E79-AEOD-8D557856AF3D 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025406 
Message: pb tonight 
Sender: 
Time: 02/03/19 08:05:30 AM (570902730) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7AA24347-FD8E-4E2A-A3D7-CAEB1011ACA2 
Message: Ok We are coming back to NY this afternoon.. If you stay come over for a Super 
Bowl party 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/03/19 08:08:44 AM (570902924) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 4162285A-339C-478B-988D-1AEBBEOF916E 
Message: thx, but pb warm 
Sender: 
Time: 02/03/19 08:20:29 AM (570903629) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: FBB54499-31D0-4F9F-BDOE-9AB988428681 
Message: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025407 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014031.txt,"Less Is More: The Art of Voluntary Poverty—An Anthology of Ancient and Modern Voices in Praise
of Simplicity (336 pages)

EDITED BY GOLDIAN VANDENBROECK

This is a collection of bite-sized philosophies on simple living. I read it to learn how to do the most with
the least and eliminate artificial needs, not live like a monk—big difference. It incorporates actionable
principles and short stories ranging from Socrates to Benjamin Franklin and the Bhagavad Gita to
modern economists.

The Monk and the Riddle: The Education of a Silicon Valley Entrepreneur (192 pages)

BY RANDY KOMISAR

This great book was given to me by Professor Zschau as a graduation gift and introduced me to the
phrase “deferred-life plan.” Randy, a virtual CEO and partner at the legendary Kleiner Perkins, has been
described as a “combined professional mentor, minister without portfolio, in-your-face investor, trouble-
shooter and door opener.” Let a true Silicon Valley wizard show you how he created his ideal life using
razor-sharp thinking and Buddhist-like philosophies. I’ve met him—he’s the real deal.

The 80/20 Principle: The Secret to Success by Achieving More with Less (288 pages)
BY RICHARD KOCH

This book explores the “nonlinear” world, discusses the mathematical and historical support for the 80/20
Principle, and offers practical applications of the same.

Muse Creation and Related Skills

Harvard Business School Case Studies www.hbsp.harvard.edu (click on “school cases”’)

One of the secrets behind Harvard Business School’s teaching success is the case method—using real-life
case studies for discussion. These cases take you inside the marketing and operational plans of 24-Hour
Fitness, Southwest Airlines, Timberland, and hundreds of other companies. Few people realize that you
can purchase these case studies for less than $10 apiece instead of spending more than $100,000 to go to
Harvard (not that the latter isn’t worth it). There is a case study for every situation, problem, and
business model.

“This business has legs”: How I Used Infomercial Marketing to Create the $100,000,000 Thighmaster
Craze: An Entrepreneurial Adventure Story (206 pages)

BY PETER BIELER

This is the story of how a naive (in the best sense of the word) Peter Bieler started from scratch—no
product, no experience, no cash—and created a $100-million merchandising empire in less than two
years. It is a mind-expanding and often hysterical case study that uses real numbers to discuss the fine
points of everything from dealing with celebrities to marketing, production, legal, and retail. Peter can
now finance the media purchases for your product: www.mediafunding.com.

Secrets of Power Negotiating: Inside Secrets from a Master Negotiator (256 pages)
BY ROGER DAWSON

This is the one negotiating book that really opened my eyes and gave me practical tools I could use

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014031
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029239.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 12/2/2015 3:31:35 PM 
To: Lisa New 
Subject: Re: Poetry Update and Thank You 
Importance: High 
I'm in Cambridge sat? 
On Wednesday, 2 December 2015, Lisa New > wrote: 
Dear Jeffrey, 
May I drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your advice 
about my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for Poetry in 
America? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the bottom a 
message just for you.... 
-Lisa 
That you are receiving this letter means that you are among a special community of friends whose 
support— financial, moral, intellectual, logistical— has allowed my initiative, Poetry in America, to 
realize what seemed, a year ago, almost certainly too ambitious a vision. That vision was to 
produce the highest quality educational video on American poetry, creating a body of 
humanities content capable of reaching a broad community of learners: formal and informal, 
online and residential, young and old, American and international. And it was to 
begin— rapidly— to disseminate and distribute our work. 
Whether you donated to Poetry in America through Filmmaker's Collaborative (our 501c3 fiscal 
sponsor), through Harvard, or through WGBH; whether you appeared on camera or talked an elusive 
friend into appearing on camera to discuss a poem; whether you lent us your film crew, or provided 
overnight use of your hotel suite or apartment or of your whole skyscraper; whether you highlighted 
our work on your stage, or talked your colleagues into becoming corporate sponsors; whether you 
flew to Boston to install state-of-the-art editing and video storage equipment, or asked your children's 
school to let us film there; whether you encouraged your family foundation to take an interest in the 
project, or gave us a lesson in IP, in licensing, in the rudiments of finance, or of distribution; whether 
you praised, or gave timely, much-needed criticism— you enabled what we have done. 
Here's what we have to report, and to show, a year later, thanks to your help. Links offer sneak 
peeks of works -in-progress across the full portfolio of Poetry in America projects. 
• The first eight-episode season of the public television series Poetry in America (a co-
production between WGBH, Emmy Award-winning filmmaker David Grubin, and my own new 
production company, Verse Video), is now fully funded and in production, with episodes featuring Bill  
Clinton, Herbie Hancock and Sonia Sanchez on Langston Hughes, Frank Gehry on Carl Sandburg, 
Katie Couric on Elizabeth Bishop, Nas on Whitman, and many more scheduled for nationwide launch 
in 2017. 
• Poetry in America's many initiatives to reach Middle and High School teachers and their 
students are taking root. Our first online course for Middle and High School Teachers, Poetry of 
the City, will launch this Spring with the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Companion 
materials to this course will be made available for free on PBS LearningMedia. This course is 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029239 
designed to meet the needs of English Language Arts and Social Studies teachers in the US and 
internationally. 
• We are eager to begin production of The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky. Designed, too, for 
Middle and High School teachers, The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky will draw English Language 
Arts instruction into dialogue with science, and will include extraordinary footage of the natural world, 
conversations with poets, scholars, and scientists as well as footage shot in class and in the field 
with great teachers. 
• A recent partnership with Greenwich Country Day School and the Success Academy Network 
of charter schools will provide a base for the production of a new collection of classroom-ready 
educational material on The Poetry of Art Sport, and Play. This collection will include discussions 
on poems filmed everywhere from sports fields to Broadway theaters, and will feature dancers, 
athletes, fashion designers, and more. 
• With a growing archive of footage capturing teachers and students reading American poems, 
we are eager to expand our reach and move into America's schools, disseminating, testing, 
and learning from teachers and students using our materials. We hope to be able to begin work 
evaluating the impact of poetry on literacy levels and character development and, eventually, to 
produce a full suite of materials that foster character development along with intellectual growth. 
Working closely with such partners as The Nantucket Project, Nautilus Magazine, The Aspen Ideas 
Festival, and The Big Think, and, of course, HarvardX, Harvard's provider of free open online 
courses, we are continuing to create rich educational media on poetry for adult learners and 
lifelong learners. These materials include short form videos such as this one on Robert Pinsky's  
""Shirt"" (as featured in The New Yorker), and, this spring, the sixth module of the free seven-part 
Poetry in America MOOC, which has registrants in over 150 countries. 
Growing rapidly, and outpacing our current staff and infrastructure, Poetry in America has a 
fundraising goal this year of 2.5 million dollars to fund its expanding group of projects. We've taken a 
big step, hiring the design agency Threespot to help us develop our web presence. Our website—
to launch early 2016— will eventually serve as an online hub for our TV show and educational 
projects. We hope you'll join us then for a virtual launch! 
Finally, Jeffrey, you have been such a wonderful supporter of my Poetry in America project. The 
Leon Black gift changed everything for me last year. It paid salaries for staff I desperately needed to 
complete projects (detail below), but first and foremost, it gave me leverage, enabling me to set 
down a solid Harvard base for my activities by giving the school something to point to: this public 
humanities project among the list of projects the Dean supports. The money did it: as soon as they 
heard about the gift, they took my project more seriously. Because of that gift, the Faculty of Arts and 
Sciences, which is space-stingy, found and rewired a studio space for me to house my video 
production operation and team. That gift woke up the Deans to the importance of Harvard's role in 
producing the highest quality humanities content for the WORLD, and not just for Harvard students. 
My main employee has half of her salary paid with these funds, and the foundation of our collection 
for PBS LeamingMedia is being made with this support. This gift represented one of the most 
consequential shifts of the last year, allowing me create content and launch projects this year that 
make future projects that much more likely. If I can keep this base sturdy at Harvard, refilling these 
coffers, I will be that much more able to keep working. 
I am also so grateful for the help you gave me in defining my project for Templeton, and, what help 
you have offered to give in bringing them around. I have, since Templeton turned me down, gotten 
funding to produce video on two of the poems I'd proposed to Templeton and to create, and test, that 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029240 
video in schools as I proposed. One of my partners in that project is Success Academy, where I 
could also expand my work with Templeton. And there are still other poems that may satisfy their 
character criteria more fully, including the third of the poems I'd originally proposed and that Joe 
Biden had agreed to discuss with me (on parenthood and humility). At this point, I'm gaining the 
platform and the name recognition to be an effective spokesperson for the foundation on building 
literacy and character in the schools. 
It really means a lot to me, all financial help aside, Jeffrey, that you are rooting for me and thinking 
about me. You push back a lot (as Larry does), and it's always annoying but I always learn. 
With abundant gratitude, 
Lisa 
Elisa New 
Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature 
Harvard University 
148 Barker Center 
12 Quincy Street 
Cambridge, MA 
02138 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029241 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019713.txt,"The Russians Are Coming | 225

Union. As “diplomats,” they were protected from arrest by the terms
of the 1961 Treaty of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
Their diplomatic cover, however, greatly limited their field for find-
ing potential recruits outside their universe of international meet-
ings, diplomatic receptions, UN organizations, scientific conferences,
and cultural exchanges. They therefore tended to recruit their coun-
terparts in adversary services.

In this regard, the successful entrapment of Harold Nicholson
in the 1990s is highly instructive. From his impressive record, he
seemed an unlikely candidate for recruitment. He had been a super-
patriotic American who had served as a captain in army intelligence
before joining the CIA in 1980. In the CIA, he had an unblem-
ished record as a career officer, serving as a station chief in Eastern
Europe and then the deputy chief of operations in Malaysia in 1992.
Even though his career was on the rise and he was a dedicated anti-
Communist, he became a target for the SVR when he was assigned
to the CIA’%s elite Russian division. Because the job of this division
was to recruit Russian officials working abroad as diplomats, engi-

© neers, and military officers, its operations brought its officers in close ©
contact with SVR officers. Nicholson therefore was required to meet
with Russian intelligence officers in Manila, Bucharest, Tokyo, and
Bangkok and “dangle” himself to the SVR by feigning disloyalty to
the CIA.

As part of these deception operations, Nicholson supplied the
Russians with tidbits of CIA secrets, or “chickenfeed,” that had been
approved by his superiors at the CIA. What his CIA superiors did
not fully take into account in this spy-versus-spy game was the
SVR’s ability to manipulate, compromise, and convert a “dangle” to
its own ends. As it turned out, Russian intelligence had been assem-
bling a psychological profile on Nicholson since the late 1980s and
found vulnerability: his resentment at the failure of his superiors
to recognize his achievements in intelligence. The Russians played
on this vulnerability to compromise him and then converted him to
becoming its mole inside the CIA.

Nicholson worked for the SVR first in Asia; then he was given a
management position at CIA headquarters, which is located in Lang-
ley, Virginia. Among other secret documents, he provided the SVR

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r.indd 225 ® 9/30/16 8:13AM | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019713
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020192.txt,"40

Putin then decided that this agent would be “welcome, provided, however, that he stops any kind
of activity that could damage Russian-US relations.” Putin’s disclosure came as no surprise to the
NSA investigation since the Russian pro-government newspaper Kommersant had reported that
Snowden visited the Russian consulate in Hong Kong.

Putin’s authorization could certainly account for Aeroflot waiving its usual passport and visa
check to allow Snowden to board its plane. It also might explain the dispatch with which
Russian officials whisked Snowden off the plane after it landed and into a waiting car at the
Moscow airport. It could even account for Snowden’s vanishing from public view for the next
three weeks and the promulgation of the cover story that Snowden was unwillingly trapped at the
airport by the U.S. government. The reasons behind Putin’s move were less clear.

By September 2013, the investigation was looking into a veritable abyss. Snowden’s culpability
was no longer an issue. What was lacking from the video, or the 2-hour film made from it by
Laura Poitras, was any specific information on how many documents he had copied, how he had
obtained the passwords to the computers on which they were stored, the period of time involved
in the theft, or how he had breached all the security measures of the NSA in Hawaii. Nor would
that data be forthcoming from Snowden, who may be the only witness to the crime, By June 23,
2013, he was in a safe haven in Moscow. Even though the Grand Jury case against Snowden
was cut and dry, it was also irrelevant because the US does not have an extradition treaty with
Russia.

The purpose of the intelligence investigation went far beyond determining Snowden’s guilt or
innocence, however. Its job was to find out how such a massive theft of documents could occur
how the perpetrator escaped, and, perhaps most urgent, who had obtained the stolen documents
from Snowden.

2

When Snowden first met Greenwald and Poitras in Hong Kong on June 3™ 2013, he displayed
in his hand, as a recognition signal. It was an unsolved Rubik’s Cube. It may also be an
appropriate metaphor for the unsolved elements in the Snowden enigma. Even in his later
interviews with journalists in Moscow, Snowden studiously avoided describing the means by
which he breached the entire security regime of America’s most secret intelligence service. He
only told the journalists who came to Moscow to interview him, with a bit of pseudo-modesty,
that he was not “an angel” who descended from heaven to carry out the theft.

But the question of how Snowden stole these documents may be the most important part of the
story. The NSA, after all, furnishes communications intelligence to the President, his National
Security advisers, and the Department of Defense that is supposedly derived from secret sources
in adversary nations. If these adversary nations learn about the NSA’s sources, the information, if
not worthless, cannot be fully trusted. The most basic mission of the NSA is to protect its
sources. Yet, despite all its efforts, Snowden walked away with long lists of its sources. In doing
so, he amply demonstrated that a single civilian employee working for an outside contractor, even

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020192
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026431.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 2/9/2017 10:45:36 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise

yes, and their projections and needs are way above current spreads. . At least in the states hospitals are now
looking to sell real estate surrounding complexes. . assisted living. baby boomers. . airport

funds starting for rebuilds. but very large. rail ports and roads also gigantic.. . no politically

correct but profitable is alternate incarceration facilities. , always tenants :)

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:23 PM, is -E wrotc:

Pension funds are now interested to match the maturities ?
Ariane de Rothschild

On 8 Feb 2017, at 23:22, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

not likely in the states. toomuch money around. you should finda niche. otherwise competing with
people that have a trillion dollars in credit needs

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:20 PM, [i <-> wrote:
If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to
10% per yr with a kicker

Ariane de Rothschild

On 8 Feb 2017, at 12:59, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the
sidelines. trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the
rothschild name.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM, EL HACHEM Johnny <g> wrote:

Dear Jeff,

As previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building
and financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record,
history and presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe’s most recognized financial
advisors to the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and
sought secure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.

We have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry,
TIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure
debt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily
involved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026431
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027214.txt,"Source Entry: H\Macintosh -17\LI 
2017-03-17 at 07.34.29.ichat 
Service: iMessage 
Start Time: 03/17/17 04:34:29 AM (511443269) 
End Time: 03/17/17 02:52:00 PM (511480320) 
Last Message ID: 2399 
Chat Room: 
Participants: jee, E HEM3 
Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com, 12063827848 
Messages - 
E on 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 03/17/17 04:34:29 AM (511443269) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EFOBA375-AECC-48EA-AE84-893FABE 10358 
Message: he should tread carefully, as his free spend will likely be reduced to only us entities . rational 
explanations do not carry the day. . in the budget as i told you , vet, and mental health. a big big increase and focus. 
its the world of the strongmen. 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 03/17/17 04:35:02 AM (511443302) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: B5284F07-9C17-4CEB-AF21-17F4019EBA8F 
Message: I send bill an email that this is the time for the Giant `DAF. to replace the loss of govt funding to 
projects of his concern, its a no brainer. 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 04:39:44 AM (511443584) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 5AFDB7E4-5CFE-4044-AFDB-9163CEC83786 
Message: I told him too He could save the day by rallying his American ""giving pledge"" folks to rescue some of 
the closed programs in the USA He could also use his own funds 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 04:43:11 AM (511443791) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 9D45ECDD-511B-4CCC-93EA-FC4C033EAB21 
Message: His advisers tell him the budget will look very different when approved, that his issues are too important 
to cut (ODA) 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 04:45:08 AM (511443908) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027214 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 181BCF50-5845-4F21-B024-6546962DCF06 
Message: Polio and PEPFAR etc He is not at all interested in mental health but he may consider advocating for 
Alzheimer disease and has no interest in getting involved w vets. He may be a little stuck ... 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 04:45:39 AM (511443939) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: Cl9BD3C8-D79C-4BB2-9093-3532DE097990 
Message: His advisers are all Obama-ites and trump haters. Deeply Entrenched. 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 04:49:56 AM (511444196) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 19E52B1E-442E-493F-BD6F-68E4AC2614FF 
Message: Are there other billionaires that could step in to help? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 03/17/17 04:52:33 AM (511444353) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 3DE3C525-D685-4DB5-AF8A-B4D8B7762493 
Message: Yes, but they have less uber size giving experience 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 04:56:33 AM (511444593) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 45B41939-24FB-4504-93AC-2850A256A24F 
Message: How can we make him listen? I feel like David and Goliath!!! :-) His advisers tell him I'm being 
disruptive and don't know what I'm talking about 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 04:56:44 AM (511444604) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: BD6A4786-CAED-46C4-8F02-DD32E87E691A 
Message: And putting him at risk 
Sender:_________________ 
Time: 03/17/17 04:57:25 AM (511444645) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027215 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 98B4DF94-BDBB-49D1-B440-152CC70D878F 
Message: I think it really will take trump pushing back on him to make him realize these are different times 
Sender: - 
Time: 03/17/17 04:57:34 AM (511444654) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 121FB7C4-7C26-4D8A-BA8E-E2D5C7AED325 
Message: That might be the only way 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 02:09:46 PM (511477786) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: BE841E10-D5A6-4846-8E19-05B69A0BE3C0 
Message: http://time.com/4704550/bill-gates-cutting-foreign-aid-makes-america-less-safe/ 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 02:51:29 PM (511480289) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7C538399-4DBE-471D-BA35-A544FCB4E2CA 
Message: Unrelated topic Do you think endogenous inflammatory cells have exploitable Magnetic properties 
Sender: - 
Time: 03/17/17 02:51:46 PM (511480306) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7F2FC11F-EOFC-4C05-8889-661047DEEC8E 
Message: Asking for endovascular purposes 
Sender: 
Time: 03/17/17 02:52:00 PM (511480320) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 99D7EEB5-69A5-4CB9-81A2-BA4AC5F90887 
Message: I want to talk about it 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027216 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013986.txt,"all media and speaking is prohibited.

Learn to turn down the static of the mind so you can appreciate more before doing more:

= The Art of Living Foundation (Course IT)— International—( www.artofliving.org )

» Spirit Rock Meditation Center in California ( http://www.spiritrock.org )

> Kripalu Center for Yoga and Health in Massachusetts ( http://www.kripalu.org )

» Sky Lake Lodge in New York ( http://www.sky-lake.org )

2. Make an anonymous donation to the service organization of your choice.
This helps to get the juices flowing and disassociate feeling good about service with getting credit for it.
It feels even better when it’s pure. Here are some good sites to get started:

»Charity Navigator (www.charitynavigator.org)

This independent service ranks more than 5,000 charities using criteria you select. Create a personalized
page of favorites and compare them side by side, all free of charge.

»Firstgiving (www.firstgiving.com)
Firstgiving.com allows you to create an online fund-raising page. Donations can be made through your

personal URL. I have used Firstgiving in coordination with a nonprofit called Room to Read to build
schools in both Nepal and Vietnam, with more countries pending: www _firstgiving.com/timferriss and
www .firstgiving.com/timferriss2. If you specifically want to help animals, for example, you can click on
a related link and access websites for hundreds of different animal charities, and then decide which one
you want to donate to. The UK version of the website is http://www.justgiving.com.

»Network for Good (www.networkforgood.org)
Visitors to this website will find links to charities in need of donations as well as opportunities to do
volunteer work. They can also set up an automated credit card donation online.

3. Take a learning mini-retirement in combination with local volunteering.

Take a mini-retirement—six months or more if possible—to focus on learning and serving. The longer
duration will permit a language focus, which in turn enables more meaningful interaction and
contribution through volunteering.

For the duration of this trip, note self-criticisms and negative self-talk in a journal. Whenever upset or
anxious, ask “why” at least three times and put the answers down on paper. Describing these doubts in
writing reduces their impact twofold. First, it’s often the ambiguous nature of self-doubt that hurts most.
Defining and exploring it in writing —just as with forcing colleagues to e-mail—demands clarity of
thought, after which most concerns are found to be baseless. Second, recording these concerns seems to
somehow remove them from your head.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013986
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030768.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
ok 
jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
6/21/2017 2:34:14 PM 
Re: How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere 
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33 AM, wrote: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIMzSf0VwEk&sns=em  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030768 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026357.txt,"On Thu, 4/23/15, Martin Weinberg PF wrote:

Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

To: ""Jeffrey Epstein"" <jeevacation@gmail.com>, ""Kathy Ruemmler""
Ce: ""Martin Weinberg"" , ""dkiesq”
Date: Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:31 PM

20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000

Boston, MA 02116

This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,

and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the

use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,

distribution, or use of the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026357
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010951.txt,"have played dumb and quit ahead. But that would have left out half the story and all
the other surprises. | confessed that the surprises are the features | can’t resist. If
they are fun for me, | can accept the challenge of making them fun for the reader.
Anyway, I already opened that can of worms by showing that I don’t accept the

Y =] +C equation even though others do. I gave an idea why, and can sketch my

reason out a little farther.

It begins with something I call the total return rule or total return truism. The
truism is that creation of value equals growth of value plus cash flow, where cash
flow means value taken out less value inserted from outside. I don’t think anyone
doubts this truism, which is fundamental everywhere every day in the investment
world. | will prove it anyhow, just for good measure, in the next chapter. It is
probably the reason that the Y = C + 1 equation is readily accepted. Net investment |
is meant to show physical capital growth. It could look to be the growth in value, if
we don’t consider human capital, and consumption C could look to be the value

taken out.

But a second look is needed. The logic doesn’t work unless we consider all value
including human capital. Some consumption is invested in human capital, and only
the rest exits the whole economy in satisfying tastes. Then the equation would still

be true if the invested part of consumption equaled human capital growth.

The reason why it doesn’t starts with what we already know about human capital.
Petty in 1664 had hit on the idea of this as time-discounted future lifetime pay.
Adam Smith in 1776 saw it equivalently as accumulated past investment in nurture
and schooling. The Americans Irving Fisher and Frank Knight revived both ideas in
the early 20"" century. The tempo picked up after World War IJ at the University of
Chicago. Jacob Mincer rederived Fisher’s present value equation in 1958, and
modeled investment in human capital through job training. Nobelists Theodore
Schultz and Gary Becker soon joined in. New insights included the realization that

human capital grows from the self-invested work of learning, as well as the outside

Chapter 2: Fast Forward 1/06/16 11

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010951
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011497.txt,"tension around us and the sense that something momentous was about to happen
as the prospect of a state got closer.

The memories remain with me to this day, like a series of snapshots. It was
on a spring morning in 1947 that I got my first real sense that the Jewish state
was something which would have be fought for, and that youngsters not all that
much older than me would have a critical role to play. I got a close-up look at
the elite of the Zionist militias, the Palmach. It numbered something like 6,000,
from a pre-state force totaling around 40,000. The Palmachniks were highly
motivated, young political activists. They had no fixed base. Each platoon,
almost all of them teenagers, spent five or six months at a time on various
kibbutzim. For the first two weeks of each month, they would earn their keep by
working in the fields. They spent the other weeks training. I had just turned five
when I watched three dozen Palmach boys and girls, in their T-shirts and short
khaki pants, rappel confidently down the side of one of our few concrete
buildings. The building was only 25 or 30 feet high, but it looked like a
skyscraper from my perch on the grass in front, and the feat of the young
Palmachniks seemed to me nothing short of heroic.

A few months later, on a Saturday afternoon in November 1947, I crowded
into my parents’ room as the Haganah radio station crackled out its account of a
United Nations debate on the future of Palestine. The session was the outcome
of a long train of events starting with Britain’s acknowledgement that its
mandate to rule over Palestine was unsustainable. The British had proposed a
series of arrangements to accommodate both Arab and Jewish aspirations. Now,
the UN was meeting to consider the idea of splitting Palestine into two new
states, one Arab and the other Jewish.

Since the partition was based on existing areas of Arab and Jewish
settlement, the proposed Jewish state looked like a boomerang, with a long,
very narrow center strip along the Mediterranean, broadening slightly into the
Galilee in the north and the arid coastline in the south. Jerusalem, the site of the
ancient Jewish temple, was not part of it. It was to be placed under international
rule. By no means all Zionist leaders were happy with partition. Many, on both
the political right and the left, wanted a Jewish state in all of Palestine, with
Jerusalem as its centerpiece. But Ben-Gurion and the pragmatic mainstream
argued that UN endorsement of a Jewish state — no matter what its borders, even
with a new Palestinian Arab state alongside it — would represent a historic
achievement. The proceedings went on for hours. At sundown, we had to return
to the children’s home. But we were woken before dawn. The vote for partition

26
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011497
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028818.txt,"InsightsPod

Executive Summary

Opportunity
Problem

The power of word of mouth is becoming more critical to businesses as has never been
witnessed before. Negative aspects associated with a brand can leave a long-term
impact on its reputation. If a customer is facing a problem with your product or service,
the world is going to hear about it. On the contrary, social media has the ultimate ability
to turn audiences into customers and communicate positive messages.

A marketer's worst nightmare is a social media campaign gone wrong. In sucha
situation, resources are diverted to fix the problem, disrupting the entire workflow.
During a social media crisis, marketers are left with limited control over the market as
the news spreads like wildfire. Businesses need to choose the right strategy and the
most appropriate way to respond.

With an increase in social media, marketing has become a two-way conversation
between brand and consumer. Customers demand businesses to be proactive and
efficient to meet their demands and InsightsPod provides businesses with the data to do
just that and more.

Solution

InsightsPod is an ambitious, innovative new company that is helping businesses,
governments, and investors in analyzing opinions, sentiments, emotions, and attitudes
of people from social media.

Imagine a customer leaves a bad review for your product. To improve your reputation
and the overall customer experience, we help you identify which customer is
dissatisfied in minutes. We help businesses determine a customer’s intent and buying
habits.

| Page 1 |

CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT DISSEMINATE. This business plan contains confidential, trade-secret
information and is shared only with the understanding that you will not share its contents or ideas with
third parties without the express written consent of the plan author.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028818
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019075.txt,"FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)

«Lx

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Date of transcription 08/18/2006
dob L___s residing at

Florida, telephone number(s) and
(cellular), was interviewed at the FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, PALM BEACH COUNTY RESIDENT AGENCY's Office, West
Palm Beach, Florida. Also present at the interview wast _]
attorney, [_.__ _lof LYONS AND SANDERS, 600 Northeast 3rd
Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33304, telephone number(s)

and (cellular). After being advised of
the identity of the interviewing agents and the nature of the
on a oe the following information:

plus benefits.

has been employed as a
since | His current salary is
Prior to his employment with EPSTEIN, sold aircraft for

GLIMCHER, a company located near_THE LIMITED Flight Department.

was employed there from According to

EPSTEIN has two other full time pilots,

EPSTEIN also has a full time flight engineer,

On occasion, in 2004 and 2005, a contracted pilot,

was required to assist with flying EPSTEIN to different
locations.

be
b7C

was the[—C—Cd FO’ EPSTEIN untill
took over the responsibilities of
after a continual disagreement between EPSTEIN and on

landing techniques. This was a demotion and a decrease in pay for
Cree rel stated that EPSTEIN was unhappy with the method in
which landed the aircraft when arriving at Palm Beach
International Airport.

rovided the interviewin via a Grand Jury b3

b6
b7C
Investigation on 08/15/2006 at West Palm Beach, Florida
File # 3LE-MM-108062 Date dictated 08/15/2006
SA b6
by SA b7c

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency;
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. 3 NE MAAL /O ¥ OG o-

a HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019075
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013038.txt,"122 6 A Brief Overview of CogPrime

Local Party Combat System
[Jally |; LOOK- around you,

[Sally]: is-the red ball next to the tree?
[Fido]: Yes
Is the bone next to the fountain?
]: No
What is the color of the ball?
The ball is red
What is next to the tree?
[Fido]: The ted ball is next to the tree

bs !

ARATIVE KNOWLEDGE

Predictive

Maintain

Evaluation Appropriate

INTENTIONAL
KNOWLEDGE

Predictive Implication

fd “My Energy

(Current Location

Find
Entity - -
Near | Evaluation Link

ee

IVE

LARAT aL
DEG cEOURON
Fonver®

Hebbian Link

(Inheritance

get My Enersy|

~

( Find Entity Near

PROCEDURAL
KNOWLEDGE

EPISODIC/SENSORY
KNOWLEDGE

Fig. 6.7: Relationship Between Multiple Memory Types. The bottom left corner shows
a program tree, constituting procedural knowledge. The upper left shows declarative nodes and
links in the Atomspace. The upper right corner shows a relevant system goal. The lower right
corner contains an image symbolizing relevant episodic and sensory knowledge. All the various
types of knowledge link to each other and can be approximatively converted to each other.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013038
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010789.txt,"ov On KD in BW DHF

ow on nm PF WwW DH FH

NNNNN NER PE BR PP Be BE
OBWNP OM OYA MN A WNKH OO

than three years after Virginia Roberts left
for --
BY MR. SCAROLA:

Q. Mr. Dershowitz --

MR. SCOTT: You're cutting the witness
off.

MR. SCAROLA: He's not answering my
question, Tom.

MR. SCOTT: Well --

MR. SCAROLA: I want to know whether the
last name is spelled the same or it isn’t
spelled the same on the flight tog marked as an
exhibit and on the photographs. That's a very
direct question. It calls for a very direct
yes or no response.

And this witness has demonstrated a clear
refusal to respond directly to direct
questions, which will result, when we resume
this deposition, in our requesting that the
Court appoint a special master so that this
deposition doesn't take two weeks to complete.

MR. SCOTT: You know, Mr. Scarola, that's
a nice speech and I appreciate it.

MR. SCAROLA: Thank you.

MR. SCOTT: I don't agree with your

203

BY MR. SCAROLA:

Q. Is the last name on the photograph spelled
exactly the same way as the last name on the flight
log?

A. If you're talking about a flight log that
1 was not on that flight, the answer is yes.

Q. Allright. Thank you very nwch, sir.

Now, that flight log also shows you flying
repeatedly in the company of a woman named Tatiana,
correct?

A. I've only seen one reference to Tatiana on
November 17. If you want to show me any other
references, I'd be happy to look at them.

Q. Allright, sir. Thank you.

Let's go back to the —

MR. SCOTT: Are we done with this exhibit?

MR. SCAROLA: We are done with the
exhibit.

MR. SCOTT: Okay. Then let's collect the
exhibits so that we don't have a big -- then

we'll turn them over to the court reporter to

keep safekeeping.

There you go, young lady, don't lose
those, don't get them wet. And we'll proceed.

characterization. And if you recall, months

ago I suggested a special master for this

deposition, for your clients’ depositions and

for Virginia Roberts’ and your response to me

was: I'll consider it, I won't pay for it. If

your client wants to pay for it -- so basically

you blew me off.

So, I appreciate you finally come around.
And your clients.

MR. SCAROLA: Your client's misconduct has
clearly convinced me, having now considered it,
that it is absolutely necessary.

MR. SCOTT: Okay. Now --

BY MR. SCAROLA:

Q. So new could I get an answer to my
question ~~

MR. SCOTT: Now that we have --

BY MR. SCAROLA:

Q. -- whether the last name on the flight log
is spelled exactly the same way as the last name in
the photographs?

MR. SCOTT: Now that all the lawyers'

speeches are done, read the question back and

the witness will answer it.
MR. SCAROLA: | will repeat the question.

204

BY MR. SCAROLA:

Q. Did you state during the same interview,
the CNN Don Lemon interview: ""She has said that
Bill Clinton was with her at an orgy on Jeffrey's
island""?

A. I did state that, yes.

Q. Was that statement intended as fact,
opinion, or was it intended as rhetorical hyperbole?

MR. SCOTT: Do you understand the
question?
THE WITNESS: Yes, I do.

A. It was a statement based on what I

believed were the facts at the time I said them.

Various newspapers and blogs had placed
Bill Clinton on, quote, ""orgy island"" on -- in the
presence of Jeffrey Epstein when there were orgies.
And at the time | made that statement, | hada
belief that she had accused Bill Clinton of
participating or being -- as being a part of or an
observer or -- or a Witness or a participant in
orgies on what was called Jeffrey Epstein's orgy
island. That was my state of belief, honest belief
at the time I made that statement.

BY MR. SCAROLA:
Q. Yes, sir, And what I want to knew is what

7 (Pages 201 to 204)

www. phippsreporting.com
(888) 811-3408

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010789
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022612.txt,"05-1 1-goodyear-information.pdf.
23 See Complaint, SEC v. ABB, supra note 48; Criminal Information at
3, United States v. ABB Inc., No. 10-cr-664 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2010),
ECF No. 1 [hereinafter United States v. ABB), available at http://
wwwjustice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/abb/09-20- 10abbinc-info.
pdé; Constitucién Politica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos [C.P.], as
amended, art. 27, Diario Oficial de la Federacién [DO], 5 de Febrero de
1917 (Mex.); Ley Del Servicio Publico de Energia Electrica, as amended,
art. 1-3, 10, Diario Oficial de la Federacién [DO], 22 de Diciembre de
1975 (Mex.).
24 See Indictment at 2, United States v. Esquenazi, supra note 44, ECF No.
3; Affidavit of Mr. Louis Gary Lissade at 1-9, id., ECF No. 417-2.
5 Criminal Information at 30-31, United States v. Alcatel-Lucent France,
supra note 56, ECF No. 10.
126 Td.
7 See International Anti-Bribery and Fair Competition Act of 1998,
Pub. L. 105-366 § 2, 112 Stat. 3302, 3303, 3305, 3308 (1998).
8 Section 30A(F)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1(£) (1)
(B); 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-2(h) (2)(B), 78dd-3 (f)(2)(B).
' Third parties and intermediaries themselves are also liable for FCPA
violations. Section 30A (a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1(a);
15 US.C. §§ 78dd-2(a), and 78dd-3(a).
® Section 30A(a)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1 (a) (3); 15
US.C. §§ 78dd-2(a) (3), 78dd-3(a)(3).
BI See, CL5 Complaint, SEC v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 11-cv-686
(D.D.C. Apr. 8, 2011) [hereinafter SEC v. Johnson & Johnson| (bribes
paid through Greek and Romanian agents)), available at http: //wwwssec.
gov/ litigation/ complaints/ 2011/comp21922. pdf; ; Criminal Information,
United States v. DePuy, Inc., No. 11-cr-99 (D.D.c. Apr. 8, 201 1), ECF
No. 1 [hereinafter United States v. DePuy] (bribes paid through Greek
agents), available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fepa/ cases/
depuy-inc/ 04-08-1 Idepuy-info.pdf; Complaint, SEC v. ABB, supra note
48 (bribes paid through Mexican agents); Criminal Information, United
States v. ABB, supra note 123 (same); Criminal Information, United
States v. Int’l Harvester Co., No. 82-cr-244 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 1982)
(bribes paid through Mexican agent), available at hetp:/ /www.justice.
gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/international-harvester/1982-11-17-
international-harvester-information. pdf.
132 See Criminal Information, United States v. Marubeni Corp., No. 12-
cr-22 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 17, 2012), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter United States v.
Marubeni\, available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/
cases/marubeni/2012-01- 17-marubeni-information.pdf; Criminal
Information, United States v. ]GC Corp., supra note 60, ECF No. 1;
Criminal Information, United States v. Snamprogetti, supra note 60, ECF
No. 1; Complaint, SEC v. ENI, S.p.A. and Snamprogetti Netherlands
BV., No. 10-cv-2414 (S.D. Tex. July 7, 2010), ECF No. 1, available at
http ://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/20 10/comp-pr2010-1 19.pdf;
Criminal Information, United States v. Technip S.A., No. 10-cr-439 (S.D.
‘Tex. June 28, 2010), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter United States v. Technip|,
available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/ technip-
sa/06-28- 10-technip-%20information.pdf; Complaint, SEC v. Technip,
No. 10-cv-2289 (S.D. Tex. June 28, 2010), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter SEC v.
Technip|, available at http ://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/20 10/
comp-pr2010-1 10.pdf; Indictment, United States v. Tesler, supra note
50; Complaint, SEC v. Halliburton and KBR, supra note 90; Criminal
Information, United States v. KBR, supra note 90; Criminal Information,
United States v. Stanley, No. 08-cr-597 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2008), ECF No.
1, available at http ://justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fepa/ cases/, stanleya/ 08-
29-08stanley-info.pdf.
133 See Criminal Information, United States v. AGA Medical Corp., No.
08-cr-172, ECF No. 1 (D. Minn. June 3, 2008), available at http://www.
justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fepa/cases/agamedcorp/06-03-08aga-info.
df.
ta Complaint, SEC v. Innospec, supra note 79; Criminal Information,
United States v. Innospec, supra note 79; Superseding Criminal
Information, United States v. Naaman, supra note 50, ECF No. 15,
available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/
naamano/06-24- 10naaman-supsersed-info.pdf; Complaint, SEC v.
Turner, supra note 50.
'5 See sources cited supra note 68.
138 See sources cited supra note 68,

'87 Section 30A(a)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1 (a) (3); 15

Endnotes

US.C. §§ 78dd-2(a)(3), 78dd-3(a) (3).

88 See Section 30A(f)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act, 15 US.C. § 78dd-1(f)
(2) (A); 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-2(h)(3)(A), 78dd-3(£)(3) (A).

8? See Section 30A(f)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, 15 US.C. § 78dd-1(F)
(2)(B); 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-2(h)(3)(B), 78dd-3(£)(3)(B). The “knowing”
standard was intended to cover “both prohibited actions that are taken
with ‘actual knowledge’ of intended results as well as other actions

that, while falling short of what the law terms ‘positive knowledge;
nevertheless evidence a conscious disregard or deliberate ignorance

of known circumstances that should reasonably alert one to the high
probability of violations of the Act.” H.R. Rep. No. 100-576, at 920; see
also Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-
418, § 5003, 102 Stat. 1107, 1423-24 (1988).

MOHLR. Rep. No. 100-576, at 920 (1988).

1 Section 30A(c)(1) of the Exchange Act, 15 US.C. § 78dd-1(c) (1); 15
US.C. §§ 78dd-2(c)(1), 78dd-3(c)(1).

“HR. Rep. No. 100-576, at 922. The conferees also noted that “[i]n
interpreting what is lawful under the written laws and regulations’ ... the
normal rules of legal construction would apply.” Jd.

143 See United States v. Kozeny, 582 FE Supp. 2d 535, 537-40 (S.D.NY.
2008). Likewise, the court found that a provision under Azeri law that
relieved bribe payors of criminal iability if they were extorted did

not make the bribe payments legal. Azeri extortion law precludes the
prosecution of the payor of the bribes for the illegal payments, but it does
not make the payments legal. Jd. at 540-41.

“Section 30A(c)(2)(A), (B) of the Exchange Act, 15 US.C. § 78dd-1(c)
(2); 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-2(c) (2), 78dd-3(c)(2).

145 For example, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals found that
providing airline tickets to a government official in order to corruptly
influence that official may form the basis for a violation of the FCPA’s
anti-bribery provisions. See Liebo, 923 F.2d at 1311-12.

M46 See generally US. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FCPA Op. RELEASE 11-01
(June 30, 2011) (travel, lodging, and meal expenses of two foreign
officials for two-day trip to United States to learn about services of US.
adoption service provider), available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/
fraud/fepa/opinion/20 11/1 1-01.pdf; US. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FCPA
Op. RELEASE 08-03 (July 11, 2008) (stipends to reimburse minimal
travel expenses of local, government-afhiliated journalists attending press
conference in foreign country), available at http: //wwwjustice.gov/
criminal /fraud/fcpa/opinion/2008/0803.pdf; US. DEPT. OF JUSTICE,
FCPA Op, RELEASE 07-02 (Sept. 11, 2007) (domestic travel, lodging,
and meal expenses of six foreign officials for six-week educational
program), available at http: //www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fepa/
opinion/2007/0702.pdf; US. Dept. oF JusTICE, FCPA Op. RELEASE
07-01 (July 24, 2007) (domestic travel, lodging, and meal expenses

of six foreign officials for four-day educational and promotional tour

of US. company’s operations sites), available at http://www.justice.
gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/opinion/2007/070 1 pdf; US. DEPT. OF
Justice, FCPA Op. RELEASE 04-04 (Sept. 3, 2004) (travel, lodging,
and modest per diem expenses of five foreign officials to participate

in nine-day study tour of mutual insurance companies), available at
http://wwwjustice.gov/criminal/fraud/fepa/opinion/2004/0404.

pdf; US. Derr. oF Justice, FCPA Op. RELEASE 04-03 (June 14,
2004) (travel, lodging, meal, and insurance expenses for twelve foreign
officials and one translator on ten-day trip to three US. cities to meet
with US. public sector officials), available at http://wwwjustice.gov/
criminal /fraud/fcpa/opinion/2004/0403.pdf; US. DEPT. OF JUSTICE,
FCPA Op. RELEASE 04-01 (Jan. 6, 2004) (seminar expenses, including
receptions, meals, transportation and lodging costs, for one-and-a-half
day comparative law seminar on labor and employment law in foreign
country), available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fepa/

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022612
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024540.txt,"k12 intends to expand the business to international markets and believes there is a significant worldwide
demand for high-quality online curriculum. In the near-term it can do so by serving multinational
corporations with large employee bases comprised of expatriates.

ki2 generated $6 million of revenue in 2002, its first year of operations, growing to more than $116.0
million projected for FYE June 30, 2006.

13.3. Virtual Schools and District-Managed Virtual Programs (94% 2006E Revenue)

The past decade has seen an increase in the number of contracts and charters awarded to Education
Management Organizations (“EMOs”), which manage traditional K-12 public schools on behalf of a school
district (“contract schools”) or manage charter schools either as the charter holder (“charter schoois”) or
under contract with the charter holder (“contract charters""). In the early half of the 1990's, EMOs were
mostly contract schools, managing traditional K-12 schools on behalf of schoo! districts. Later, as public
money became available to charter schcols through the use of vouchers, these organizations moved
toward charter schocl management and contract charter management.

A movement toward alternatives to the public school system is expected to generate substantial growth in
the for-profit EMO sector. Alternative schools and alternative management pregrams provide a significant
opportunity to improve the current educational “product.” Furthermore, under the NCLB, growth in public
school management is expected to continue as schcols that fail to achieve “Adequate Yearly Progress”
(""AYP”) for four consecutive years are subject to one of the following sanctions: replacement of all or most
staff including the principal, state takeover of the school, hiring an outside entity to manage the school, or
becoming a charter school. 412 is well positioned to take advantage of these trends.

To comply with NCLB, all states submitted a plan to the Department of Education indicating baseline
achievements for the 2002-03 school year and how 100% ""proficiency"" would be achieved by 2013-14.
The law mandates that student progress and achievement be measured (“assessed”) by math and
reading tests that will be given to every child, every year, beginning in the 2005-06 school year. In
addition, a science assessment will be added beginning with the 2006-07 school year. Under Bush
administration proposals, by the 2009-10 school year, students will be tested every year from grades 3 to
11. These assessments are considered intermediate benchmarks that measure a school’s ability to
demonstrate “Adequate Yearly Progress” (AYP) toward meeting its own goals.

Contract Charters. Charter schocls are independent public schools, designed and operated by
community groups or non-profit entities, but sponsored by designated local or state educational
organizations that monitor their quality and integrity. In return for a large measure of autonomy and
freedom from regulation, charter schools are accountable for student academic performance.

The Genter for Education Reform estimates that, in the 2004-05 school year, there were 3,345 charter
schools serving nearly 894,000 students, representing an estimated 1.6% of total K-12 students. Charter
schools now operate in 40 states and the District of Columbia, up from 38 in the 2003-04 school year. In
the 2004-05 school year, enrollment in charter schools represented 1.6% of total K-12 enrollment and
annual spending on charter schools was $7 million or 1.4% of total spending on all K-12 schools.
However, in the decade of 1995-2005 the number of charter schools had grown on average nearly 13%
annually while charter school enrollment increased over 20%, clearly outpacing the less than 1% average
K-12 enrollment growth over the same period.*”

k12 participates In the charter school business by setting up virtual public schools that it manages through
a partnership with a non-profit entity. After going through the legislative process at the local or state level
and obtaining a charter for a school, k12 sets up a non-profit organization with a principal and the right
administrative team to create the school. A12 then enters into a contract with the non-profit organization

* Source: Harris Nesbitt, Education and Training, September 2005.

107

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024540
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027400.txt,"Message: Caught in bind now. Doesn't want to let him go and cause more damage

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/20/18 04:22:16 PM (556500136)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

§

GUID: FAF6DE8F-E67A-4121-834E-8AFBC42FCASC

Message: k

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027400
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021752.txt,"Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein is a free man, despite sexually abusing
dozens of underage girls according to police and prosecutors. His victims have never
had a voice, until now.

“It seems to show that they are not taking these cases very seriously, they are not
advocating for strong punishment for sexual predators, and not advocating for
victims in a meaningful way. °

Villafafia, a well-regarded 18-year veteran federal prosecutor, would not comment
for this story. But her lawyer, Jonathan Biran, said she has worked tirelessly on
behalf of crime victims. She received the 2011 National Crime Victims’ Rights
Service Award as well as the Attorney General’s Project Safe Childhood Award.

He also pointed out that the parents of the victim in the Texas man’s case wrote a
letter thanking Villafana at the conclusion of the case.

“AUSA Villafafia has spent her 18-year career advocating tirelessly on behalf of
victims of some of the most serious crimes in Florida, and has received numerous
awards for her successful prosecution of major cases,” Biran said, adding that
Villafafia has “made South Florida a safer place for children and adults alike.”

Enticing a minor

By all accounts, Adam McDaniel was an awkward and shy Texas teenager who spent
countless hours on his computer, socializing with girls on the internet.

In 2005, McDaniel, then 19, traveled from Texas to Fort Lauderdale, where he
hopped into a taxi and headed to Boca Raton to meet up with a 14-year-old girl he
had been talking to online for about a year. He picked up the ninth grader at a high
school basketball game, and drove her to a Marriott, hotel where they spent the
night, court records show.

When she failed to come home that evening, her parents called Boca Raton police.
Officers tracked the pair down at the hotel the next day, where they found them in
bed, clad in little more than their underwear, according to court records.

McDaniel was arrested on federal sex charges, and pleaded guilty on Oct. 6, 2006, to
enticing a minor into sexual conduct by means of interstate commerce, which
carried a sentence of from five years up to 30 years in federal prison.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021752
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025886.txt,"> former Vice President Gore and his then wife,
Tipper,

ever
> visited Little St. James. I was the Island’s
manager

> from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with
my

wife
> during that entire period. Regarding President

> Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never
met

the

> man. As far as I know President Clinton was never
on

> the Island. He was never there while I was
present

on

> the Island. If he had come to the Island while I
was

> on holiday, my staff would have told me that
President

> Clinton was on the Island while I was away. while
I

> worked on Little St. James, I had been called back
from

> holiday many times to help when any guests visited
the

> Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the

> Island while I was away, I would have been called
back

to
> the Island for such a visit, and I never was.

> The same is true for Vice President Gore and his
wife

> Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am

> aware were never on Little St. James during the
entire

> period that I was the Island manager.
>

> Sincerely,

> Miles Alexander
>
>

> Sent from my iPad

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025886
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033377.txt,"From: Jide Zeitlin IZ

Sent: 5/4/2018 4:40:15 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem

Importance: — High
Yes.

On May 4, 2018, at 12:39 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Easy . Does 11 work

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:37 AM Jide Zeitlin {> wrote:

Meetings here in PB are winding down. How’s your day look tomorrow?
Separately, do you know Oleg Deripaska or Ivan Glasenberg?

On May 3, 2018, at 3:59 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

No worry both problem and solution will still be there -)

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:30 AM Jide Zcitlin (> wrote:
Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window
before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note:

""Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth.
Okey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after
Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I

spoke earlier with the Vice President.

Whenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.""

On May 2, 2018, at 11:05, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Eee = hc is cahriman of bubai world ports. african ports anew focus he built the palm
islands. is totally trustworthy

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM Jide Zeitlin > wrote:
Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his

WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today?
When's best on Friday for me to visit with you?

Bibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe.

please note

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033377
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015000.txt,"General Investment Related Disclosures:

Taiwan Readers: Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or a solicitation of an offer to transact in any securities or other financial instrument. No part of
this report may be used or reproduced or quoted in any manner whatsoever in Taiwan by the press or any other person without the express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch.

This research report provides general information only, and has been prepared for, and is intended for general cistri
er or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instru
options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences). This report is not intended to provide personal investmen

expressed constitutes an of

bution to, BofA Merri

advice and it does n

Il Lynch clients. Neither the information nor any opinion

ment or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g.,

ot take into account the specific investment objectives,

financial situation and the particular needs of, and is not directed to, any specific person(s). This report and its content do not constitute, and should not be considered to constitute, investment

advice for purposes of ERISA, the US tax code, the Investment Advisers Act or otherwise. Investors should seek fina
ing investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report and should unders

instruments and implemen
decision to purchase or subscri
document issued in connec

deposits or other obligations o
among others, market risk, coun
instruments may be difficult to
income from such securities and
lose their entire principal inves
This report may contain a short-
short-term price impact on the
reflects both a longer term total
be more or less positive than as
Futures and options are not appropria
disclosure documents. Investme
BofA Merrill Lynch is aware that
action may
executing any short idea contained in

he implemen

his report.

Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect

including ADRs, effectively assume currency risk.
UK Readers: The protections provided
located outside of the United Kingdom. BofA

errill Lyne

h Global Researc|

MLPF&S or one of its affiliates is a regular issuer of traded financial instru

time, hold a
BofA Merrill
w

rading position (long or short) in the securities and financial
Lynch, through business units other than Bo
ith, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in

methods of the persons who prepared them, and BofA Merrill Lynch is un
recipient of this report.

In the event that the recipient received this report pursuant to a contract
therewith MLPF&S may be deemed

beyond the delivery of this report (unless otherwise agreed specifically in

transactions, including transactions i

nany securities mentioned in this re

Copyright and General Information regarding Research Reports:

Copyright 20

retransmitted or disclosed, in whole
simultaneously to internal
review of this research report consti
(including any investmen
Materials p

BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research and certain business groups. As a resul
research reports. To the extent this report discusses any legal proceeding or issue
should consult their own

any BofA Merrill Lynch entity and/or its directors, officers and employees may be
on public information. Facts and views presented in this material that rela
professionals in other busi

This re

securities. None of MLPF&S, any of i

Global

report containing such rating, recommendation or investment thesis.

Any information relating to the tax s

seek tax advice based on tl
The information herein (o
may contain links to third-
contained on such third-party websites is not part o
any affiliation with BofA Merrill Lynch. Access to any
submitting any personal information to them. BofA
Certain outstanding repor'
recent research report rela
In some cases, an issuer may be classified as Restric
its security and/or financial

or in part, or in any form or manner, without
and client websites and other portals by BofA

he value, price or income of any security or financial ins

by the U.K. regulatory regime, including the Financial Services Scheme, co not a
h policies relating to conflicts of interes

instrum

port.

I Lynch
, BofA

and that statements

h, are not insured by
America, N.A). Investments in general and, derivati

lyst or event impacting
erent from and do

relative to other stocks within i

such strategies do not

o seek advice rega

ents discussed in this report.

‘A Merrill Lynch Global Research, may have issued and may in the future issue trading ideas or recommenda
his report. Such ideas or recommendations reflect the different time
der no obligation to ensure that such other trading ideas or recommendations are brought

between the recipient and MLPF&S for the provision of research services for a separate fee,
o be acting as an investment adviser, such status relates, if at all, solely to the person with whom MLPF&S
writing by MLPF&S). MLPF&S is and continues to act solely as a broker-dealer in connection

7 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. iQmethod, iQmethod 2.0, iQprofile, iQtoolkit, iQworks are service marks of Ban
iQcustom®, iQdatabase® are registered service marks of Bank of America Corporation. This research report is prepared for the use of BofA Merri
he express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch. BofA Merri
errill Lynch and are not publicly-available materials. Any unautl
utes your agreement not to redistribute, retransmi
recommendations, estimates or price targets) without
repared by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel are based on
information known to, professionals in other business areas of BofA Merri

, or disclose to others the contents, opinions, co

public i
, including investment banking personnel. BofA Merrill
errill

e to any such
ness areas of BofA Merrill Lynch in connection with the legal proceedings or matters relevant to such proceedings.
port has been prepared independently of any issuer of securities mentioned herein and not in connection with any proposed offering of securities or as agent of
s affiliates or their research analysts has any authority whatsoever to make any representation or warranty on behalf of the issuer(s}. Bo
Research policy prohibits research personnel from disclosing a recommendation, investment rating, or Investment thesis for review by an issuer prior to the pub

plaintiffs, defendants, co-defendants or co-plaintiffs wi

proceedings have not been reviewed by, discuss

atus of financial instruments discussed herein is not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone to provide tax advice.
heir particular circumstances from an independent tax professional.
her than disclosure information relating to BofA Merrill Lynch and its affiliates) was obtained from various sources and we do not guarantee its accuracy. This report
party websites. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsible for the content of any third-party website or any linked content contained in a third-par'
this report and is not incorporated by reference into this report. The inclusion of a link in this report does not im
third-party website is at your own risk, and you should always review the terms and privacy policies at third-party websi
errill Lynch is not responsible for such terms and privacy policies and expressly disclaims any liability for them.
s may contain discussions and/or investment opinions relating to securities, financial instruments and/or issuers that are no longer curren
ing to an issuer prior to making an investment decision.
ed or may be Under Review or Extended Review. In each case, investors should consider any investment opinion
instruments) to be suspended or withdrawn and should not rely on the analyses and investment opinion(s) pertaining to such issuer (or i

rument mentioned in this report. Investors in such secuti

pply in general to business coordinated by BofA Merrill
are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.
ments linked to securities that may have been recommended in this report. MLPF&S or one of its

Lynch does not disclose certain client relationshi
s, it has not been prepared as nor is it intended to express any legal conclusion, opinion or advice. Investors
egal advisers as to issues of law relating to the subject matter of this report. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel’s knowledge of legal proceedings in which

ncial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in financial

regarding future prospects may not be realized. Any

be for securities in any offering must be based solely on existing public information on such security or the information in the prospectus or other offering
ion with such offering, and not on this report.
Securities and other financial instruments discussed in this report, or recommended, offered or sold by Merrill Lync
any insured depository institution (including, Bank o

the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and are not
ves, In particular, involve numerous risks, including,

erparty default risk and liquidity risk. No security, financial instrument or derivative is suitable for all investors. In some cases, securities and other financial
value or sell and reliable information about the value or risks related to the securi
other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuate and that price or value of such
ment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to

y or financial instrument may be difficult to obtain. Investors should note that
securities and instruments may rise or fall and, in some cases, investors may
uture performance. Levels and basis for taxation may change.

erm trading idea or recommendation, which highlights a specific near-term catal
equity securities of the issuer. Short-term trading ideas and recommendations are dif
return expectation and attractiveness for investmen
ock's fundamental equity rating.
e for all investors. Such financial instruments may expire worthless. Before investing in futures or options, clients must receive the a
nt strategies explained in this report may not be appropriate at all times. Costs 0
ation of the ideas expressed in this report may depend upon an in
be limited by regulations prohibiting or restricting ""shortselling’ in many jurisdictions. Investors are urged

the issuer or the market that is anticipated to have a
not affect a stock's fundamental equity rating, which

s Coverage Cluster. Short-term trading ideas and recommendations may

ppropriate risk
include commission or margin expenses.

vestor's ability to ""short"" securities or other financial instruments and that such

ding the applicability of such regulations prior to

ies and instruments,
Lynch entities

affiliates may, at any

ions that are inconsistent
rames, assumptions, views and analytical
0 the attention of any

and in connection
ly and does not extend
with the execution of any

has contracted direct

of America Corporation. iQanalytics®,

| Lynch clients and may not be redistributed,
Lynch Global Research reports are distributed
horized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and
nclusion, or information contained in this report

first obtaining expressed permission from an authorized officer of BofA Merrill Lynch.
nformation. Facts and views presented in this material

have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect
has established information barriers between
h, or compensation received from, such issuers in

Lynch
ps wit

hor involving issuers mentioned in this report is based
ed with, and may not reflect information known to,

any issuer of any
A Merrill Lynch
ication of a research

nvestors are urged to

bsite. Content
endorsement by or
es before

y we
ply any

. Always refer to the most

relating to such issuer (or
s securities and/or

financial instruments) nor should the analyses or opinion(s} be considered a solicitation of any kind. Sales persons and financial advisors affiliated with MLPF&S or any of its affiliates may not

solicit purchases of securities or financial instrumen

s that are Restricted or Under Review and may only solicit securities under Extended Review in accordance with

irm policies.

Neither BofA Merrill Lynch nor any officer or employee of BofA Merrill Lynch accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential damages or losses arising from any use of

this report or its contents.

Bankof America
Merrill Lynch

Global Equity Volatility Insights | 20 June 2017

29

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015000
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024263.txt,"httos://coincenter.org/entry/what-are-smart-contracts-and-what-can-we-do-with-them

archived at https://perma.cc/BH6T-J6S7.

[OPTIONAL]
e Arvind Narayanan; “What Happened to the Crypto Dream, Part 1,” Co-published by the
IEEE Computer and Reliability Societies (March/April 2013)
http://randomwalker.info/publications/crypto-dream-part1.pdf archived at

https://perma.cc/DX8U-QJ5A.
e Arvind Narayanan, “What Happened to the Crypto Dream?, Part 2,"" Co-published by the

IEEE and Reliability Societies (May/June 2013)
http://randomwalker.info/publications/crypto-dream-part2.pdf archived at
https://perma.cc/F482-84AY.

e Lawrence Lessig Code 2.0 lecture from COALA Blockchain Workshop:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcYJTIDhYFO.

e Chelsea Barabas and Ethan Zuckerman, “Can Bitcoin be used for Good?,” The Atlantic
(April 7, 2016)
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/04/bitcoin-hype/477141/ archived at
https://perma.cc/V94Q-CCP3.

Day 4: Private Infrastructures for Government Surveillance

Digital privacy has at times been understood as privacy against corporate intrusion (think ad
networks); against government (think the various government intelligence-gathering
establishments around the world); and against one another (think drones as well as more
pedestrian technologies that empower people to document facts about, or even doxx, each
other).

This session will look at the second form of surveillance, especially as effectuated through the
cooperation or compulsion of private intermediaries. How successful is such surveillance, and
will it continue to be effective as the public reacts by potentially adopting privacy-enhancing
tools? How successful do we want it to be, and how might frameworks agreeable within
jurisdictions that embrace the rule of law be used or abused within those that do not?

Readings:

e David O’Brien, Matt Olsen, Bruce Schneier, and Jonathan Zittrain, et al. “Don’t Panic.
Making Progress on the ‘Going Dark’ Debate,” The Berkman Center for Internet &
Society at Harvard University (Feb 1, 2016)
https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/pubrelease/dont-panic/Dont_Panic_ Making Progress on
Going Dark_Debate.pdf archived at https://perma.cc/NT9M-ELAG.

e John Cassidy, “Lessons from Apple vs. The F.B.I.,” The New Yorker (March 29, 2016)
http://Awww.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/lessons-from-apple-versus-the-f-b-i
archived at https://perma.cc/282P-A7MS.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024263
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017411.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

Moscow, I wanted to meet him, so I stood in line waiting to shake his hand after the performance.
When I introduced myself, he grabbed me in a long bear-hug. “You gave us hope,” he told me.
“We knew you were out there fighting for our rights, even thought we couldn’t contact you. You
made us feel safer.”

I had no idea that Rostropovich or any of the other artists or dissidents whose rights we
advocated, had ever heard of us, or had any idea of what we were doing on their behalf.
Rostropovich’s hug, and what he said, was more than enough compensation for all the pro-bono
work we had done on behalf of dissidents and artists around the world.

I had become involved in the defense of Soviet dissidents after reading Elie Wiesel’s eye-opening
book “The Jews of Silence,” which first alerted me to the plight of Soviet Jewish and non-Jewish
dissidents. I traveled to the Soviet Union and other parts of Eastern Europe on several occasions
during the 1970s and 1980s and filed briefs on behalf of dissidents Refusenicks and others. I have
written extensively about this aspect of my human rights work elsewhere” and will not repeat it
here. Suffice it to say that my unwillingness to limit my advocacy only to Jewish Refusenicks in
the Soviet block caused a rift with some Jewish and Israeli organizations, but I insisted that
human rights must extend to all who are oppressed or discrimination against.

One of my Soviet clients was Silva Zalmunsen, who after several years of confinement was finally
released from the Soviet Gulag. When she finally came to America, I along with her other
American lawyers arranged to meet her over lunch at Lou Siegel’s, a kosher restaurant in
Manhattan. It would be our first “reunion” — hopefully the first of many — with the clients we had
never met. Our encounter was emotional and tearful. Knowing of Silva’s love for all things
Jewish, we decided to order a real old-fashioned Jewish meal for our Friday lunch. The first dish
was cholent, a delicious concoction of beans, potatoes, barley, and a small amount of beef,
cooked for hours in a savory sauce. When the cholent came, I turned to Silva and explained what
it was — that it was a traditional dish served in Jewish homes on the Sabbath. She took one taste
of it, and her face turned sad — and then she burst out laughing as she exclaimed, “Traditional
Jewish food? This is Russian prison food! I’ve just been through eating food like this for four
years!” Only then did we realize that the old-fashioned food, which was such a treat for us, was
peasant food, designed to use the least amount of meat possible. The same economics that
dictated the diets of our peasant forebears now determined the menus prepared by the prison
authorities. We all had a good laugh, and I ordered a slice of rare roast beef for our guest.

I made several trips to the Soviet Union during that time. On one of them I met a young man
who had been a dissident and refusenick but who had been drafted into the army because of his
activities. He wanted to smuggle a message out in is own voice, using his broken English, to seek
support from human rights organizations throughout the world. Tape recorders were not
permitted in the Soviet Union at that time and it was illegal to smuggle out tapes. But he had
managed to get his hand on a primitive cassette recorder and he brought me a copy of a
Tchaikovsky tape that was being sold in the Soviet Union. In order to prevent re-recording over
the tape, certain changes had been made in the cassette. My Soviet client knew how to override
those changes and he managed to record his statement in lieu of the third movement of
Tchaikovsky’s Fifth. He told me that its always good to have the recorded statement in the

°8 [cite Best Defense, Chutzpah, articles]

324

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017411
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031900.txt,"2D

European countries, and which we therefore can’t take for granted.
So, as you see, the normative concern is separate from the empirical
question of whether democracy is inevitable.

SHAFFER: Origins incorporates economics, anthropology,
philosophy, and social psychology, for lessons about political order.
Is that kind of study too rare today?

FUKUYAMA: This ts partly the fault of the structure of academia.
There’s such a premium placed on specialization and narrowness that
it’s very hard to think more broadly and to cross disciplinary
boundaries. I work at Stanford in an interdisciplinary institute, and
I’ve been associated with these kinds of outfits for most of my years.
And those are where the most interesting research gets done.

SHAFFER: What field outside of political science has the most
important insights for understanding political order?

FUKUYAMA: That’s hard to say. I don’t know if there is one. Part
of the problem is economics — it’s a very important discipline, but in
a way it’s colonized the rest of the social sciences. A lot of political
analysis in academia is driven by this model of everybody being a
rational decision maker driven by more or less material interests.
There’s obviously something to that, but it’s a very limited way of
looking about politics, which is about dignity and values and ideas
that can’t be explained in material terms. Other disciplines —
sociology and anthropology — have gotten at those things better than
economics has.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031900
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022606.txt,"ENDNOTES

'S. Rep. No. 95-114, at 4 (1977) [hereinafter S. Rep. No. 95-114],
available at http ://www.justice.gov/' criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ history/ 1977/
senaterpt-95-114.pdf.
* Id; H.R. Rep. No. 95-640, at 4-5 (1977) [hereinafter H. R. Rep. No.
95-640], available at http ://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/
history/1977/houseprt-95-640.pdf. ‘The House Report made clear
Congress's concerns:

The payment of bribes to influence the acts or

decisions of foreign officials, foreign political parties

or candidates for foreign political office is unethical.

It is counter to the moral expectations and values of

the American public. But not only is it unethical, it

is bad business as well. It erodes public confidence

in the integrity of the free market system. It short-

circuits the marketplace by directing business to

those companies too inefficient to compete in terms

of price, quality or service, or too lazy to engage in

honest salesmanship, or too intent upon unloading

marginal products. In short, it rewards corruption

instead of efficiency and puts pressure on ethical

enterprises to lower their standards or risk losing

business.
Td.
3 See, e.g, U.S. AGENCY FOR INT'L Dev., USAID ANTICORRUPTION
STRATEGY 5-6 (2005), available at http://transition.usaid.gov/policy/
ads/200/200mbo.pdf. The growing recognition that corruption poses
asevere threat to domestic and international security has galvanized
efforts to combat it in the United States and abroad. See, CLs Intl Anti-
Corruption and Good Governance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-309,
§ 202, 114 Stat. 1090 (codified as amended at 22 US.C. §§ 2151-2152
(2000)) (noting that “[w]idespread corruption endangers the stability
and security of societies, undermines democracy, and jeopardizes the
social, political, and economic development ofa society. vee [and that]
[clorruption facilitates criminal activities, such as money laundering,
hinders economic development, inflates the costs of doing business, and
undermines the legitimacy of the government and public trust”).
4 See Maryse Tremblay & Camille Karbassi, Corruption and Human
Trafficking 4 (Transparency Int'l, Working Paper No. 3,201 1), available
at http: //issuu.com/ transparencyinternational/ docs/ ti-working_paper_
human_trafficking 28 _jun_2011; U.S. AGENCY FoR INT’L Dev.
FOREIGN AID IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST 40 (2002), available at
http://pdfusaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDABW900.pdf (“No problem does
more to alienate citizens from their political leaders and institutions,
and to undermine political stability and economic development, than
endemic corruption among the government, political party leaders,
judges, and bureaucrats. The more endemic the corruption is, the more

Endnotes

likely itis to be accompanied by other serious deficiencies in the rule of
law: smuggling, drug traficking, criminal violence, human rights abuses,
and personalization of power.’).

> President George W. Bush observed in 2006 that “the culture of
corruption has undercut development and good governance and

.... impedes our efforts to promote freedom and democracy, end
poverty, and combat international crime and terrorism.” President’s
Statement on Kleptocracy, 2 Pus. Papers 1504 (Aug. 10, 2006),
available at http i//; georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/ news/
releases/2006/08/20060810.html. The administrations of former
President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama both recognized
the threats posed to security and stability by corruption. For instance,

in issuing a proclamation restricting the entry of certain corrupt foreign
public officials, former President George W. Bush recognized “the
serious negative effects that corruption of public institutions has on the
United States’ efforts to promote security and to strengthen democratic
institutions and free market systems... .” Proclamation No. 7750, 69
Fed. Reg. 2287 (Jan. 14, 2004). Similarly, President Barack Obama's
National Security Strategy paper, released in May 2010, expressed the
administration’s efforts and commitment to promote the recognition that
“pervasive corruption is a violation of basic human rights and a severe
impediment to development and global security.” THE WHITE House,
NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY 38 (2010), available at http://
www.whitehouse.gov/ sites/default/files/rss_viewer/ national_security_
strategy.pdf.

6 See, C85 INT’L CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ET AL., CLEAN BUSINESS
Is Goop BusINEss: THE BUSINESS CASE AGAINST CORRUPTION
(2008), available at http ://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_
events/8.1/ clean_business_is_good_business. pdf; ; World Health Org.,
Fact Sheet No. 335, Medicines: Corruption and Pharmaceuticals (Dec.
2009), available at http ://wwwowho.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs335/
en/; Daniel Kaufmann, Corruption: The Facts, FOREIGN Por’y, Summer
1997, at 119-20; Paolo Mauro, Corruption and Growth, 110 Q. J. Econ.
681, 683, 705 (1995) (finding that “corruption lowers private investment
... [and] reduc[es] economic growth ...”); THE WorLD BANK, THE
Data REVOLUTION: MEASURING GOVERNANCE AND CORRUPTION,
(Apr. 8, 2004), available at http ://go.worldbank.org/87JUY8 GJHO.

’ See, e.g., The Corruption Eruption, ECONOMIST (Apr. 29, 2010),
available at http://www.economist.com/node/ 16005114 (“The hidden
costs of corruption are almost always much higher than companies
imagine. Corruption inevitably begets ever more corruption: bribe-takers
keep returning to the trough and bribe-givers open themselves up to
blackmail”); Daniel Kaufmann and Shang-Jin Wei, Does “Grease Money”
Speed Up the Wheels of Commerce? 2 (Nat'l Bureau of Econ. Research,
Working Paper No. 7093, 1999), available at http ://www.nber.org/
papers/w7093.pdf (“Contrary to the ‘efficient grease’ theory, we find

104

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022606
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024554.txt,"pursuant to their Preferred Return (such fraction to be equal to the portion of the Units held by the Profits
Participation Limited Partner attributable to members of the Profits Participation Limited Partner other
than the Principals), multiplied by the number of Units held by the Profits Participation Limited Partner
divided by the number of outstanding Units other than those Units held by the Profits Participation Limited
Partner; (iii) third, for the Profits Participation Limited Partner to receive an amount equal to a fraction of
the amount the Common Limited Partners and the Genera! Partner received pursuant to their Preferred
Return (such fraction fo be equal to the portion of the Units held by the Profits Participation Limited
Partner attributable to members of the Profits Participation Limited Partner who are Principals or their
affiliates), multiplied by the number of Units held by the Profits Participation Limited Partner divided by the
number of outstanding Units other than those Units held by the Profits Participation Limited Partner; and
(iv) finally, for all Partners (including the Profits Participation Limited Partner} to share in the profits of the
Partnership in proportion to the number of Units held by them.

The General Partner may, in its discretion, when establishing the capital structure of subsidiaries or joint
ventures, provide for a capital structure which provides for high-vote and low-vote (or non-voting)
securities with substantially equivalent economic rights intended to correspond to the voting and
economic structure of KUE (taking into account differences in legal form, such that corporate subsidiaries
do not have specified distribution or liquidation rights with respect fo common stock). Notwithstanding
any contrary provisions below addressing equal merger consideration, to the extent securities of an entity
corresponding to the voting structure of KUE are to be distributed tc the Partners, the high-vote securities
shall be distributed to KUE LLC for purposes of maintaining the voting structure subsequent to such
distribution, as long as the securities otherwise have substantially equivalent economic rights and the
high-vote securities have mandatory conversion features equivalent to the mandatory conversion features
of the Class B Shares of the General Partner (as discussed below), it being understood that securities
with high-voting rights shall not be deemed to have a higher economic value than securities with limited or
no voting rights solely by reason of the disparity in voting rights.

14.10. Allocations of Income and Losses

In general (and subject to certain special tax and regulatory allocations), income and gains of KUE will be
allocated to the Partners in the following priority:

¢ First, to the General Partner in an amount equal to the losses previously allocated to the General
Partner pursuant fo the third bullet in the losses allocation from the inception of KUE, fess ail
income previously allocated to the General Partner pursuant to this bullet;

*« Second, to the Common Limited Pariners and the General Partner in proportion fo and to the
extent of the excess of their unreturned capital contributions over their adjusted capital account
balances:

e Third, pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) in proportion as follows: (a) to the Common Limited
Partners and the General Partner in proportion to and to the extent of the excess of: (i} the sum of
their unreturned capital contributions and their undistributed Preferred Returns; over (i) their
adjusted capital account balances; and (b) to the Profits Participation Limited Partner an amount
of income such that the amount of Income allocated pursuant to Subsections (a) and (b) of this
bullet are in the same proportions as the distributions pursuant to Subsections (a) and (b) of the
second bullet of 14.9 above would be in if cash, in the same amount as the income, were being
distributed pursuant to the second bullet of 14.9 above:

e Fourth, to the Profits Participation Limited Partner in the amount necessary to ensure, as
promptly as possible and to the extent feasible, that the cumulative net income of KUE for all
periods since its inception shall have been allocated to the Common Limited Partners, the Profits
Participation Limited Partner, and the General Partner in proportion to the number of Units held
by each such Partner; and

121

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024554
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027414.txt,"GUID: BSFD8858-33DC-4DD5-9403-CAF283CC25D5

Message: About Terje A film version of Oslo has been announced,
screen by J. T. Rogers and produced by Marc Platt, whose credits

to be written for the
include Bridge of

Spies, La La Land, and Wicked.[19] Rogers indicated, in a televis
the motion picture may include some details of the story omitted

Time: 09/17/18 05:54:39 PM (558924879)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: EAF691A3-A9C8-49FD-9D30-6C331DF3A29D

Message: ???

Sender:

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 09/17/18 10:38:07 PM (558941887)

Flags: 1085445
Ts Read: No
No

Is Invitation:

T,

GUID: DEESFFO4-68F4-48A1-AF67-BO8E2858B7F7

Message: Your breakfast

Time: 09/18/18 04:05:26 AM (558961526)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: A3AC2615-5E77-4178-8BC1-6E3A079283D0

Message: ???

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 09/18/18 04:38:36 AM (558963516)

Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AIF3DDEF-4FC9-4922-B632-E2C44E6FD54D

Message: I thought you were having breakfast with my friend terry
now future movie is about him

Time: 09/18/18 04:39:42 AM (558963582)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

ion interview, that
from the play. [1]

The oslo play and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027414
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025892.txt,"US.:

+1 888 660 6127

Access code: 81662098

ODYSSEY Program

The ODYSSEY Phase 3 program is one of the most comprehensive clinical trial programs ever conducted for
an investigational LDL cholesterol lowering therapy. The program includes 14 global Phase 3 trials evaluating
more than 23,500 patients. The primary efficacy end point in all of the studies was the mean percent reduction
from baseline in LDL cholesterol at week 24 compared to placebo (maximally tolerated statin therapy); all of
the completed studies met their primary endpoint. A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved LDL
cholesterol of less than 70 mg/dL in the Praluent group as compared to placebo at both week 12 and week 24.
The ongoing ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial will prospectively evaluate the cardiovascular benefits of Praluent
in approximately 18,000 patients.

Important Safety Information

Do not use PRALUENT if you are allergic to alirocumab or to any of the ingredients in PRALUENT.

Before you start using PRALUENT, tell your healthcare provider about all your medical conditions, including
allergies, and if you are pregnant or plan to become pregnant or if you are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed.
Tell your healthcare provider or pharmacist about any prescription and over-the-counter medicines you are
taking or plan to take, including natural or herbal remedies.

PRALUENT can cause serious side effects, including allergic reactions that can be severe and require treatment
in a hospital. Call your healthcare provider or go to the nearest hospital emergency room right away if you have
any symptoms of an allergic reaction including a severe rash, redness, severe itching, a swollen face or trouble
breathing.

The most common side effects of PRALUENT include: redness, itching, swelling, or pain/tenderness at the
injection site, symptoms of the common cold, and flu or flu-like symptoms. Tell your healthcare provider if
you have any side effect that bothers you or that does not go away.

Talk to your doctor about the right way to prepare and give yourself a PRALUENT injection and follow the
""Instructions for Use"" that comes with Praluent.

www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088

Please click here for the full Prescribing Information.

About Sanofi

Sanofi, an integrated global healthcare leader, discovers, develops and distributes therapeutic solutions focused
on patients' needs. Sanofi has core strengths in the field of healthcare with seven growth platforms: diabetes
solutions, human vaccines, innovative drugs, consumer healthcare, emerging markets, animal health and the
new Genzyme. Sanofi is listed in Paris (EURONEXT: SAN) and in New York (NYSE: SNY).

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025892
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021746.txt,"4

Former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta never told sexual-abuse victims of a lenient plea
deal for Jeffrey Epstein.

Getty Images

Only then did Zloch learn that McDaniel had preyed on other girls over the internet,
including a 16-year-old California girl whom he brought to Texas and impregnated.
He was also having another relationship with a 15-year-old girl at the time of his
arrest, Villafafa admitted in court.

The judge promptly sentenced McDaniel to 10 years — twice what Villafana
recommended.

Three months later, in January 2007, after reviewing the entire case, Zloch issued
an order excoriating Villafaiia for failing to tell him about McDaniel’s prior history.

“The serial nature of defendant’s seduction of minor girls was revealed for the first
time to the court upon the Government’s response to the Court’s inquiry,” Zloch
wrote, explaining that the defendant’s past was evidence of predatory behavior that
watranted a harsher sentence because he may pose a danger to the community.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie was assigned to try to correct the record and
persuade the judge to strike a portion of his comments. They argued that since
McDaniel had never before been charged with a crime, the history was not relevant

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021746
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015014.txt,"you've got this sort of [inaudible] tortured — tortured logic, which is the phrase that has come up, but
it’s this sort of self-justifying loop in which professionals are loaning their credentials to this kind of
activity. And you see the same thing in the Office of Legal Counsel, where you have, you know,
lawyers loaning their credentials to approving what are clear violations of the Geneva Conventions.""
(https:/Awww.democracynow.org/2009/4/21/the story of mitchell jessen associates )]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015014
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033363.txt,"|essire|

=

Katy L. Huberty, CFA — Morgan Stanley
May 29, 2019 10:28 PM GMT

Given the risk of further restrictive trade measures, we answer investors’ top questions. We expect
shares to remain choppy, with a near-term floor around $160. Our estimates are unchanged but
peer multiple contraction drives our SoTP-driven PT to $231 (from $240).

What is the latest view on iPhone demand in China? On Apple's April 30th earnings call, CEO Tim
Cook noted that the November-December period was likely to be the trough in iPhone demand in
China, following an improvement in performance during the March quarter helped by iPhone price
cuts, VAT tax rollbacks, increased financing options and better consumer confidence. Data from
push-messaging service provider Jigaung shows that the improvement in iPhone demand likely
persisted through April, where Apple gained over 175bps of Chinese smartphone installed base
share Y/Y (1). However, the increasingly tough trade rhetoric and actions recently taken by US and
Chinese authorities make it less likely this trend will continue into May/June. Late last week,
following the Huawei blacklist, President Trump commented that ""it's possible that Huawei would be
included in a trade deal"", suggesting recent actions could be bargaining chips to use in trade __|
negotiations that can be worked out by/around the G20 Summit in late June, but with Apple guiding
June quarter revenue down 8% Q/Q (vs. trailing 3 year seasonality of -14% Q/Q), the risk remains
that weaker near-term demand in China increases the risk of a revenue shortfall. For reference, we
model 37M iPhone shipments in the June quarter (-10% Y/Y), in-line with iPhone builds, which
implies a 5th consecutive quarter of double digit iPhone shipment declines in China. If we assume
Chinese demand significantly weakens in the last 6 weeks of the quarter and iPhone shipments
instead fall 50% Y/Y (a 10 point further deceleration from March Q declines), then we'd expect 2.3M
lower iPhone units (-6% vs. our current model), $1.6B lower revenue (-2.9%) and a $0.05 hit to EPS
(-2

This alert is sent from:
Andrew Atlas, Andrew.Atlas@morganstanley.com

You received this because you requested that you receive content and reports from:
APPLE INC.
Please contact your FA if you want to unsubscribe from the alerts.

ay
Laid

Disclosures:
Please see the full report for risks, disclosures and other important information.

Important disclosures regarding the relationship between the companies that are referenced in Morgan Stanley research
and Morgan Stanley Wealth Management research are available on the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management disclosure
website at https:/Avww.morganstanley.com/online/researchdisclosures.

Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Not Acting as Municipal Advisor

Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is not acting as a municipal advisor to any municipal entity or obligated person
within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act (the ""Municipal Advisor Rule"") and the opinions or
views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of the Municipal Advisor
Rule.

iz

a
Huy

5

att id

in

Copyright
The copyright in materials provided by Morgan Stanley is owned by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC. Morgan Stanley Wealth
Management is the trade name of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, a registered broker-dealer in the United States.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033363
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024277.txt,"BROCK PIERCE - CHAIR OF THE BITCOIN FOUNDATION

INDUSTRY LEADER AND SPOKESPERSON SERIAL ENTREPRENEUR
(ge IGE (2001-2007) - Merged with ItemBay
Mone i MILKEN INSTITUTE
20/20 Zam (2004-2012) - Sold to TenCent

IMI EXCHANGE IMI Exchange (2004-Present)

Singularity I RI E I)
ven

University Xfire 2.0 (2011-Present)

CoinSummite I iat Suliu Playsino (2011-Present)

GOCOIN GoCoin (payment processor)

The ®} BLADE | Blade Financial (Bitcoin debit card)

Sumeatt 201
BITC@INS —"" @ wcoue &8))) Coin Congress (conference)

we —) BLOCKCHAIN 7

CAPITAL ONE FERRY BUILDING, SUITE 255 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 investor@blockchain.capital

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024277
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031914.txt,"Article 1.

The Daily Beast

Obama’s True Claim to Fame
Michael Tomasky

August 23, 2011 -- Barack Obama hasn’t been much of a domestic-
policy president from nearly anyone’s point of view. And it’s a little
hard to picture how he might ever be seen as such—that is to say,
even if he’s reelected, he’ll probably have a Republican House or
Senate (or both) that will thwart him at every turn, so the best he’Il be
able to say is that he presided over a slow and very difficult economic
recovery, which presumably will finally happen by January 2017. But
foreign policy could be a completely different story. Here one can see
how he might become not just a good but a great foreign-policy
president. Yes, of course, let’s stipulate: the war isn’t actually, you
know, over. And even after it is, Libya could descend into chaos or
extremism or both (although it is heartening to read that the National
Transitional Council, the recognized new governing body, apparently
has detailed governance plans in place). So could Egypt, and Tunisia,
and so on and so on. Lots of things could, can, and undoubtedly will
go wrong. Let’s also stipulate that Obama did not drape himself only
in glory on Libya. The administration’s statement in June that the
conflict wasn’t under the purview of the War Powers Act because
bombing didn’t constitute “hostilities” was ridiculous. And many
critics reasonably felt back in March that Obama was a little slow to
pull the trigger on the intervention (I didn’t share that view).

All that said, the administration has already handled a lot of these
changes well (and in the face of absolutely constant know-it-all
criticism). One of the best things an American administration can do
when big changes are afoot somewhere in the world is stay out of the
way and not act as if we can will an outcome just because we’re

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031914
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017405.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

2995

disrupt the 7 day Sabbatical cycle.

The Orthodox Jewish community was in an uproar about this well intentioned proposal, because it
would change the natural order of when the Jewish Sabbath fell. Under the conventional
calendar, the Sabbath corresponded with Saturday. Under the brave new world proposal, the
Jewish Sabbath could fall on any day of the week. Jews (and Seventh Day Adventists) had fought
hard to recognize Saturday as a day off from most jobs and school activities. The UN proposal
would require Sabbath-observers to be absent from such activities when the Sabbath fell on a
weekday.

At the time I was president of the “Inter- Yeshiva High School Council”—a group I had formed
after the principle of my high school banned me from running for the presidency of the school’s
student body. I used the newly formed organization as the nerve-center for the campaign to stop
the universal calendar. We did not consider the proposal to be anti-Semitic; it was motivated by
benign universalistic aspirations. We regarded it as insensitive to the religious concerns of certain
groups.

In an effort to broaden the opposition, I reached out to Seventh-Day Adventists (who joined our
efforts), Muslims (who seemed less concerned about whether their day of rest corresponded with
the UN’s “Friday”) and other religious groups. The result was a postcard campaign (I still have
the postcard) in which we sent thousands of the following message—where I drafted—to the UN:

Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge

United States Delegation

United Nations, N.Y.

Dear Sir:

As a student of a Hebrew parochial high school in New York, I wish to express my
opposition to the World Calendar Reform proposal soon to come before the United
Nations. This proposal, which would move the Jewish Sabbath to other days of the week,
would have disastrous effects on Jewish religious life, thus impairing the freedom of
religion which we so cherish.

Respectfully yours,

Under Auspices of the Inter- Yeshiva High School Student Council

It was a modest effort by later standards: no marches, sit-ins or lawsuits. But it succeeded. The
UN dropped the proposal and our small group got credit in the media. Here is how the New
York Post—my community’s “newspaper of record” in those days—reported our success beneath
the headline, “Calendar Reform Tops Formosa Issue in Letters to U.N.:”

“World Calendar reform, not Formosa, is the topic provoking most of the letters being

received by Ambassador Lodge, chief U.S. representative at the U.N.

°° Joseph P. Lash, Calendar Reform Tops Formosa Issue in Letter to U.N., N.Y. Post, April 21, 1955, p. 34,
quoting a U.S. note to Secretary General Dag Hammarskjold.

318

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017405
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023518.txt,"Article 1.

The Washington Post
Where Netanyahu fails himself and Israel

Fareed Zakaria

May 26 -- Conventional wisdom is fast congealing in Washington
that President Obama was wrong to demarcate a shift in American
policy toward Israel last week. In fact, it was Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu who broke with the past — in one of a series of
diversions and obstacles Netanyahu has come up with anytime he is
pressed. He wins in the short run, but ultimately, he is turning himself
into a version of Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko, “Mr.
Nyet,” a man who will be bypassed by history.

Here is what Netanyahu’s immediate predecessor, Ehud Olmert, said
in a widely reported speech to the Israeli Knesset in 2008: “We must
give up Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem and return to the core of
the territory that is the State of Israel prior to 1967, with minor
corrections dictated by the reality created since then.” Olmert, a man
with a reputation as a hard-liner, said that meant Israel would keep
about 6 percent of the West Bank — the major settlements — and
give up land elsewhere. This was also the position of Ehud Barak,
Israel’s prime minister during the late 1990s.

The Bush administration did not have a different position, as
statements from the president and Condoleezza Rice make clear. Here
is George W. Bush in 2008: “I believe that any peace agreement
between them will require mutually agreed adjustments to the
armistice lines of 1949 to reflect current realities and to ensure that
the Palestinian state is viable and contiguous.” (The 1949 armistice
lines is another way of saying the 1967 borders.)

Or consider this statement from last November: “|T|he United States
believes that through good-faith negotiations, the parties can

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023518
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026343.txt,"From: Michael Wolff [a

Sent: 5/23/2019 12:56:01 AM
To: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

Lunch tomorrow? Or after? I have 4:00 appt. anytime before works.

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:53 PM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Free afternoon

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM Michael Wolff TT — wrote:

Where are you tomorrow?

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026343
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010945.txt,"too, but we became the specialists. Adaptation grades into innovation whenever it
somehow becomes a norm. That too happens with other creatures, but not as often
or as lastingly. Their new norms almost always revert to the old ones. Our

innovations collect and accrue. That’s why growth is our history.

Its costs are failure rates and learning curves. Many innovations are blind alleys, and
most others need shakedown runs. But we're stuck with those as the cost of being
human. And we're stuck with them whether the result right now is growth or not.
They were our cost of survival during our million years as homo erectus, when the
archeological record shows little overall change in the stone tools we made. Growth
and lasting innovation picked up marginally with the emergence of Ancestral Eve
and bigger brains about 200,000 years ago, and began accelerating about 50,000
years ago. Growth happened because the more or less constant cost of adaptation
and innovation became less than the payoff. New ideas finally found traction at no
added cost. Mill’s idea was that more payoff in growth need not presuppose more

sacrifce.

Does that mean that all we need for growth is new ideas and the courage to trust
them? Well, no. We still have to plow back depreciation as the cost of holding even.
We need practical savvy and patience too. Sometimes great new ideas must wait for
an opening. That may be why our bigger brains showed little effect on the kinds of
tools we made until about 50,000 years ago. And I will argue that innovations need
laws and customs that welcome them. Otherwise they will make a few bucks for the
local warlord rather than wealth for the originator and the world. But what they

don’t need, say Mill and I and the data, is tighter belts.

Adam Smith, in his Wealth of Nations published in 1776, proposed growth by belt
tightening. Most tradition has agreed, with the proviso that new ideas must come
first. Solow raised doubts about the role of consumption restraint, but stopped short
of denying a need for it. Mill acknowledged both ways to grow. My charts and tables
will confirm that only the kind that troubled Solow has actually happened, in every

Chapter 2: Fast Forward 1/06/16 5

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010945
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011483.txt,"need remains what I tried to impress on my negotiators then: realism. A
meticulously informed, utterly unvarnished, understanding of the threats we
face, of each altered situation after every success or a failure, and an ability to
set aside the background noise and political pressures and chart a way forward.

So what is that way? It begins with the mindset. On more than one occasion
in the past few years, after Prime Minister Netanyahu had warned our country
of a nuclear Iran or the spread of Al Qaeda-style hatred and violence, as if
prophesying the coming of Armageddon, I would say to him: “Stop talking like
that. You’re not delivering a sermon in a synagogue. You’re Prime Minister.”
Having been privileged to live my own life along with the entire modern history
of our country, I went further. Zionism, the founding architecture of Israel, was
rooted in finding a way to supplant not just the life, but the way of thinking,
which hard-pressed Jewish communities had internalised over centuries in the
diaspora: in Hebrew, the galut. We would instead take control of our own
destiny, building and developing and securing our own country.

Now, I told Bibi, he was back in the mindset of the galut. Yes, al-Qaeda, and
more recently Islamic State, were real dangers. The prospect of a nuclear Iran
was even more so. “But the implication of the way you speak, not just to Barack
Obama or David Cameron, but to /sraelis, is that these are existential threats.
What do you imagine? That if, God forbid, we wake up and Iran is a nuclear
power, we’ll pack up and go back to the shtetls of Europe?”

Of course not. Israel, as my public life has taught me more than most,
remains strong militarily. We are, still, fully capable of turning back any of the
undeniable threats on our doorstep. Keeping that strength, developing it and
modernizng it, are obviously critically important. But as Israel’s founding Prime
Minister, David Ben-Gurion, used to say, the success of Zionism, and of the
Israeli state, required two things: strength and “righteousness.” He didn’t mean
the word in purely religious terms. He meant that Israel, if it were to retain
international backing and internal cohesion, must be guided by a core of moral
assumptions as well.

That, in itself, would be reason enough to pursue every possible opportunity
for “end of conflict” with our neighbours. And, at home, to protect and re-
inforce our commitment to Israel as both a Jewish and a democratic state. But
Israel’s simple self-interest — its hope for prosperity, social cohesion, and
growth in future — makes this nothing short of imperative.

12
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011483
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019061.txt,"“Ge: @

Albuquerque rom: Miami
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 12/06/2006

LEAD (s):
Set Lead 1: (Action)

ALBUQUERQUE
AT SANTA FE , NM

InterviewL_____ Jeffrey
Epstein's, Zorro Ranch, 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico.

Set Lead 2: (Action)

SAN _ JUAN

AT ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.1.

Interview[ cellular telephone number of
, residence telephone number __
Jeffrey Epstein located on the island of Little St. b6

James. b7¢c

Set Lead 3: (Action)

SAN JUAN

AT ST. THOMAS, U.S.V.1.

Locate and Interview
telephone number This is the only information FBI
Miami currently has on ‘

Set Lead 4: (Discretionary)

Florida.

Set Lead 5: (Action)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019061
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026678.txt,"﻿Creation Date: 	2017/06/29 16:44:18Z	
Modification Date: 	2017/06/29 16:44:20Z	
Length: 	00:00:19	
Frame Height: 	352	
Frame Width: 	640	
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014025.txt,"never had the time to finish my muse—the interview guide. But I was getting tons of requests to do
consulting from my readers, so I started with resume editing and expanded into mock interviews— yes,
not very “muse-like” but I charged high rates and could make my old salary in a fraction of the time. I
did this ALL while staying completely anonymous out of necessity—because I didn’t want to get fired
without an alternative income stream. Amazingly, my services took off even though I couldn’t tell
anyone who I was.

At the same time, I decided I would not get another job in finance, and would instead leave in June
2008. So I had a very short amount of time to make everything work. Almost every single one of my
friends, roommates, and family doubted me and said it would never work. I decided they were all wrong
and I would just do it anyway— worst-case scenario, I could always reduce my expenses and move to
Thailand to teach English.

To boost my income, I completely revamped my site to sell more of my offerings, which took me
from pocket change to full-time income from part-time consulting over July-August 2008. This allowed
me to travel to Hawaii and Aruba to go snorkeling, surfing, and shark-cage-diving and visit friends in
other parts of the U.S. all while making an investment banker’s income from part-time work.

As the recession and economy worsened, my business picked up because it was counter-cyclical—
anything that helps people find jobs is in huge demand in a poor economy. I’ve since helped scores of
laid-off bankers and other financiers find work elsewhere. However, I was also starting to work a lot
more because I was effectively trading time for money ... so over the fall I started to work on my
original product idea—my interview guide—and released it to great success later in 2008.

It has gone on to free up a ton of time, double my revenues, and put the majority of my income on
autopilot. If I didn’t do any further work from this point onward, I could make 2—3x my previous
monthly income simply by writing once or twice a week for my site (4-5 hours) and doing limited
consulting on the side (10 hours). So you could say I’ve increased my income almost 3x while reducing
my hours 6x-9x and making myself completely mobile.

I admit that often I do “work” more than this, but it’s all on related educational projects that I want to
work on, not anything that I have to work on. And if I don’t feel like working one week, I can reduce my
hours to the 5-15 hour range and spend my time on learning languages, sports, or traveling to exotic
destinations.

This setup allowed me to take an amazing trip to China, Singapore, Thailand, and Korea in December-
January and get in some ridiculous adventures. [Il be moving to Asia in a few months and after that,
traveling the world indefinitely while running my business from coffee shops.

Incidentally, I met up with a lot of customers in Asia who thought this was the coolest thing ever!

Your book has changed my life and infinitely improved my lifestyle, and I just wanted to thank you
for everything.

—B. DECHESARE

WHO SAYS KIDS HOLD YOU BACK?

My first action was to think “what is the worst that can happen on a scale of 1-10” if I quit my well-
paid, very secure government job? The power of this thought process is incredible.

I quit my job, sold my house, and went camping for three months with two kids under two and a half

and a pregnant wife (mini-retirement). We (very slowly) drove the SE coast of Australia from Sydney to
Adelaide.

With the complete clarity of mind that comes from being in a field with your family with no
immediate worries, I put into action a plan that I had been tinkering with for 12 months. I bought a
wireless Internet dongle and created an info product for electrical engineers, and wrote some software to

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014025
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.txt,"From: Lesley Groff 
Sent: 4/28/2016 4:46:00 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein 
Importance: High 
ok... 
so sorry... 
On Apr 28, 2016, at 12:42 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
----------Forwarded message---------- 
From: Martin Weinberg 
Date: Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM 
Subject: Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein 
To: Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Privileged - Redacted 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: < 
Date: April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT 
To: < 
Subject: RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein 
Sorry, the suit is attached to this email. 
From: Ingram, David (Reuters News) 
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM 
To: 'Martin G. Weinberg' 
Subject: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein 
Hi Marty, 
The attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another 
man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we 
want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this 
behalf? 
My number is 
Thank you in advance. 
David Ingram 
and I'm available any time. I also just tried your cell phone. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031462 
Correspondent 
Reuters News 
Thomson Reuters 
Reuters.com 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
<katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf> 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031463 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019707.txt,"The NSA‘s Back Door | 219

pensions, paid medical leave, and other benefits. It was a system that
effectively replaced military careerists with freelancers.

The irony of the situation was that the NSA had surrounded its
front doors with rings of barbed wire, closed-circuit cameras, and
armed guards, but for reasons of economy, bureaucratic restrictions,
and convenience it had left the back door of outsourcing open to
temporary employees of private companies, even though it might
take some time for them to gain entry to its inner sanctum.

“Tt was not a question of if but when one of the contractors would
go rogue,” the former NSA executive who wrote the 2015 memoran-
dum told me. Snowden answered that question in 2013. Even more
extraordinary than the theft itself was the reaction to it by the NSA.
It turned out that there was no cost of failure levied against the out-
side contractor Booz Allen, which had employed Snowden when he
bypassed its security regime to steal the keys to the kingdom. Even
though the counterintelligence investigation showed Snowden stole
documents from compartments to which he did not have access, the
NSA did not penalize Booz Allen. Instead, its revenues and profits

© from government contracts markedly increased between 2013 and ®
2015.

Nor did the NSA alter its reliance on private contractors. The back
door to the NSA remained wide open. Outsourcing to private com-
panies has become an all but irreplaceable part of the intelligence
system in America, Snowden’s actions, and the risk of future similar
actions, notwithstanding.

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r.indd 219 ® 9/30/16 8:13AM | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019707
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020186.txt,"34

retracing all his activities at the NSA over the past four years. To begin with, they needed to find
out how many documents from the Center had been copied and taken by Snowden.

The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Pentagon’s own intelligence service, meanwhile
was kept partially in the dark. It did not learn from the NSA that Snowden had stolen military
documents, concerning the joint Cyber Command until July 10, 2013. In terms of sheer quantity,
the number of stolen military documents was staggering. The DIA found that Snowden had
copied “over 900,000” military files. Many of these files came from this joint command, which
had been set up in 2011 by the NSA and Army, Navy, Marine and Air Force cryptological
services to combat the threat of warfare in cyberspace. The loss was considered of such
importance that between 200 and 2500 military intelligence officers worked day and night for the
next four months, according to the DIA’s classified report, to ""triage, analyze, and assess
Department of Defense impacts related to the Snowden compromise."" The job of this unit, called
the Joint Staff Mitigation Oversight Task Force, was to attempt to contain the damage caused by
the Snowden breach. In many cases, containment meant shutting down NSA operations in China,
Russia, North Korea and Iran so they could not be used to confuse and distract the U.S. military.

The NSA and Defense Department were not the only government agencies concerned with
determining the extent of the breach. There was also the CIA. The NSA acted as a service
organization for it, handling most, if not all, of its requests for communication intelligence to
support its international espionage operations. Although the CIA and NSA were both part of the
so-called “Intelligence Community,” the NSA did not immediately share with the CIA details of
the Snowden breach. Despite the immense potential damage of the theft, it was not until a week
later that CIA Director John Owen Brennan and Deputy Director Michael Morell were briefed by
the NSA. When Morell realize how much data had been taken by Snowden, he was astounded
“You might have thought of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand
theft would have been the NSA,” he wrote “but it turned out that the NSA had left itself vulnerable.”
According to Morell, he bluntly told the NSA briefer that it was urgent for the CIA to be brought
in on the case. After all, only four years earlier Snowden had been employed by the CIA.
Specifically, Morell said the CIA needed to find out three things. Has CIA documents had been
part of Snowden’s haul? How long had Snowden been stealing documents? Had Snowden been
working “with any foreign intelligence service, either wittingly or not?” According to Morell, the
effort to get a direct answer from NSA officials to these three key questions “proved maddeningly
difficult.” He found that in mid June NSA officials with whom he dealt were so “distraught at the
massive security breach” that initially they even refused to allow CIA officers to participate in the
on-going security review. A former NSA executive told me there was “near panic” at the NSA.
Finally, Morell called Chris Inglis, a former professor of computer science who had risen to be the
NSA’s Deputy Director at the time of the breach. Inglis, who headed operations for the NSA,
told him “the news was not good.” Among the data copied by Snowden were a large number of
CIA secrets. By the time, the CIA learned that its secrets had been compromised, Snowden was
headed to Russia.

The investigation of a crime involving potential espionage is no easy task. In this case, it
required attempting to solve a jigsaw puzzle in which not only were key pieces missing but, since
it involved adversary intelligence services, some of the found pieces might have been twisted to
deliberately to mislead the US investigators.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020186
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026425.txt,"Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026425
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013992.txt,"Last but Not Least
> THE BEST OF THE BLOG

The Art of Letting Bad Things Happen

[AFTER 3 WEEKS OFF OF THE BLOG]

Loong time no see! I just landed back in California from a long overdue mini-retirement through

London, Scotland, Sardinia, the Slovak Republic, Austria, Amsterdam, and Japan. Some unpleasant
surprises awaited me when I checked in on the evil e-mail inbox. Why? I let them happen.

I always do.

Here are just a few of the goodies that awaited me this time:

e » One of our fulfillment companies had been shut down due to the
CEO’s death, causing a 20%+ loss in monthly orders and
requiring an emergency shift of all web design and order
processing

e» Missed radio and magazine appearances and upset would-be
interviewers

e » More than a dozen lost joint-venture partnership opportunities

It’s not that I go out of my way to irritate people—not at all—but I recognize one critical fact:
Oftentimes, in order to do the big things, you have to let the small bad things happen. This is a skill we
want to cultivate.

What did I get in exchange for temporarily putting on blinders and taking a few glancing blows?

e » I followed the Rugby World Cup in Europe and watched the New
Zealand All Blacks live, a dream I’ve had for the last five years.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013992
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017363.txt,"4.2.12

WC: 191694

Historically I think we can all agree that false statements have considerable variation and
degree. The core concept of perjury grows out of the Ten Commandments, ""bearing false
witness,"" a term that consisted in accusing another falsely of a crime. Clearly the most
heinous brand of lying is the giving of false testimony that results in the imprisonment of
somebody who is innocent. Less egregious, but still quite serious, is false testimony that
results in the conviction of a person who may be guilty, but whose rights were violated in
a manner that would preclude conviction if the police testified truthfully. ...The least
culpable genre of false testimony are those that deny embarrassing personal conduct of
marginal relevance to the matter at issue in the legal proceeding.

I then tried to place Clinton’s false statements in their proper place along this continuum.

I think it is clear that the false statements of which President Clinton is accused fall at the
most marginal end of the least culpable genre of this continuum of offenses, and would
never even be considered for prosecution in the routine cases involving an ordinary
defendant.

I then blasted the Committee for having never conducted hearings on the corrosive problems
never conducted hearings on the corrosive problem of police perjury—‘testilying.”

If we really want to reduce the corrosive effect of perjury on our legal system, the place to
begin is at or near the top of the perjury hierarchy. If instead we continue deliberately to
blind ourselves to pervasive police perjury and other equally dangerous forms of lying
under oath, and focus on a politically charged tangential lie in the lowest category of
possible perjury, hiding embarrassing facts by evasive answers to poorly framed question,
which were marginally relevant to a dismissible case, we will be reaffirming the dangerous
and hypocritical message that perjury will continue to be selectively prosecuted, as a crime
reserved for political or other agenda-driven purposes.

I then warned that:

[H]istory will not be kind to this committee. History will not be kind to this Congress. I
think this committee and this Congress will go down in history along with the Congress
that improperly impeached Andrew Johnson for political reasons.

Following my testimony, Chief Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat, of the United States Court of Appeals for
the 11"" Circuit, was asked to comment about the different types of perjury I had discussed. He
replied that “perjury is the same, regardless of the circumstances.” I then responded to Judge
Tjoflat’s view:

I think this committee is doing a terrible disservice to the rule of law and to the sanctity of
the oath by trivializing the differences, as Judge Tjoflat said in one of the most

276

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017363
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018050.txt,"Opening Day. 8:00 pm. Featuring Kardashians for Beach Bunny Swimwear and Joonbug. com after-party. Griffin. New York.

Event address: 50 Gansevoort Street, New York. Event web address:www.elle.com/Runway/Fashion-Week-Style-360-Schedule3.
Tags: After party Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

Manuel de la Cruz

Fashion Week Presentation. 8:00pm. Spring 2011 collection. Invitation only. Metropolitan Pavilion. New York. Contact: Press: Daniella
Asantewaa. mdlc.pr@gmail.com.

Event address: 125 West 18th St., New York.
Tags: Industry Media Industry Retail Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion.

September Concert Foundation

Second Annual Gala. 8:00pm. Cocktails, and dinner. Olympic Tower Atrium. New York. Contact:
Jeaninne. rsvp@septemberconcert.org. (212) 333-3399.

Event address: 645 Fifth Avenue, New York. Event web
address: www.septemberconcert.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=105% 3 Aour-2nd-annual-gala-even.

Tags: Gala Industry Music Social Patron Civic.

Whitney Eve

Fashion Week Presentation. 8:00pm. Spring 2011 collection. Invitation only. Industria - Studio 6. New York. Contact: Caitlin
Kelly. caitline@alisonbrodpr.com.

Event address: 89 Jane Street, New York. Event web address: whitneyeve.com.

Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

John Varvatos
Tenth Anniversary Party. 9:00 pm. Cocktails and entertainment. Invitation only. John Varvatos Boutique. New York.

Event address: 315 Bowery, New York.
Tags: Cocktail party Fashion Event Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Susan G. Komen for the Cure

20th Annual Komen NYC Race for the Cure. 9:00am. 5k run/walk. Tickets from $30.00. Central Park. New
York. info@komennyc.org. (212) 560-9590.

Event address: , New York. Event web address: www.komennyc.org.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018050
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031802.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 3/26/2019 11:11:17 AM 
To: DAVID SCHOEN 
Subject: Re: From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit relating to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein dies 
Yup 
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM DAVID SCHOEN < > wrote: 
A U.S. District Court judge in New York who was presiding over a lawsuit involving a wealthy, Clinton-
connected financier and sex offender died Sunday at the age of 96. 
https://www.foxnews.com/us/federal-judge-overseeing-key-lawsuit-relating-to-pedophile-jeffrey-epstein-dies 
Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031802 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015772.txt,"82 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?

Yasser Arafat and Shimon Pérez

together. This lifeblood of our existence — long-distance communication
between human beings — turns out to be amazingly difficult, even with
all our clever technology.

In recent years the Internet has, in theory, allowed each and every
person to communicate freely with any other person on the planet.
In some of the most distant parts of the world mobile phones, and
projects such as; ‘One Laptop per Child’ are rapidly bringing unlimited
communication to all. This communication can be personal, one-to-one,
or broadcast: I can talk to people interested in a particular topic directly.
As we watch the Arab world democratize, catalyzed by the Internet, there
is no question that digital communication has now become a major force
in the world. Yet, people don’t communicate over the Internet as much
as you would expect; they often use the Internet to set up phone calls
during which they arrange meetings! This is odd. We have a fantastic
phone system and sophisticated communication technologies; email,
video and instant messaging. Yet, we still choose to travel when we want
to communicate.

On the face of it, there should be no difference between a phone
call and a meeting. In principle the same information can be conveyed.
Yet when we want to really understand someone, we always go to meet

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015772
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033405.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 3/17/2019 10:18:39 PM
To: Larry Sun mers
Subject: Re: Call from New Yorker.

Helen fisher- anatomy of love - you might find amusing

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 4:35 PM Larry Summers i. wrote:

Home Boston. Will try to call

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at:

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Mar 17, 2019, at 4:21 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

where are you?

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:16 PM Larry Summers ( wrote:

I hear you.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: I IT TZ 7 7

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Mar 17, 2019, at 12:26 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

last i looked (sic), you do not have ovaries.

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:24 PM Larry Summers SS wrote:

That is true.
Interesting. I take a serious note from someone as a deed not words.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at:

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Mar 17, 2019, at 12:17 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033405
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027372.txt,"Is Invitation: No

GUID: B37A1648-9972-4BF6-B887-814D76E4D978

Message: . As advertised

Time: 07/31/18 09:46:24 AM (554748384)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 75E074DB-F6C2-4DC6-A3BC-EE05280CO0E

»

r,

Message: Yep

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 07/31/18 09:48:54 AM (554748534)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: B0926510-FDD4-40CF-A13A-413D52CB052!1

Gl

Message: And and both will have a private dinner with yuou

Sender: i’

Time: 07/31/18 10:19:58 AM (554750398)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: CB87B188-CDF2-4384-BCC7-OCD4A375ED3A

Message: Very cool

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 07/31/18 01:09:11 PM (554760551)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 648D5132-1A4A-48 9B-B45A-4EB54802DA7F

Message: No space between yours and toms view on china. He now has a detailed story of
how . Hes off to see kissinger to bounce it off him . You will like it

Time: 07/31/18 01:11:15 PM (554760675)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 82FE32E5-0441-438A-9E73-BC8A7440954F

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027372
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021020.txt,"It’s Easy to Gripe About USA Inc.’s High Expense Levels...

That Said, High Expenses Could be Covered by High Revenue

e There are two primary drivers of USA Inc.’s revenue: 1) GDP growth and 2)
related tax levies on consumers and businesses.

e To bring its income statement mechanically to break-even for 2009 (excluding one-
time charges), USA Inc. would have needed to raise individual income tax rates by
~2x across-the-board to an average of ~26-30% (from ~13%) of gross income.' This
certainly seems draconian. And a tax increase of this nature would surely have a
significant negative impact on USA’s GDP growth as consumers would have far less
disposable income to buy goods and services.

e This brings us to a key element of USA’s financial challenges — the need to drive
economic (GDP) AND related job growth. This is not easy. A material portion of GDP
growth over the past few decades was driven by rising consumption aided by rising
leverage and we have now entered a period of de-leveraging.

e Stronger economic growth would be hugely beneficial for USA Inc.’s revenues. But
the legacy of the financial crisis - severe housing imbalances and the need to
complete the long process of writing off private mortgage debt — means that the US
recovery will probably remain slow for at least several years. The silver lining: A
booming global economy should provide a modest lift to US growth.

Note: 1) USA Inc.’s F2009 revenue shortfall was $997B (excluding one-time discretionary spending items). F2009 total
income tax receipts from individuals were $915B. As a result, if one were to raise individual income tax rates alone to achieve

[ financial break-even, one would have to more than double individual income tax rates across-the-board.
www.kpcb.com ne. at Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?
B kpeb USA Inc. | What Might a T dE Consider? 357

Drive Growth: If Real GDP Grows 0.1 Percentage Point Faster Than Current
CBO Projection For F2011-F2020E, the Budget Deficit Could Shrink by 5%

Without Other Policy Changes

e CBO analysis shows that for every 0.1 percentage point (pps) increase in real GDP annual
growth rate above CBO’s baseline estimate for F2011-F2020E, USA Inc.’s revenue (driven
by taxes) could be $247 billion higher, spending could be $41 billion lower (driven by
reduced welfare spending) and the budget deficit could be reduced by $288 billion, or 5%.

CBO’s baseline What if real GDP : Deficit
assumption for annual _— grows faster than Revende Spending Reduction

real GDP growth CBO’s forecast by... ($B / %) ($B / %) ($B / %)

+$247 -$41 -$288

eee +1% % 5%
2.1% F2011E +$1,235 -$205 -$1 ,440

° EIeRe +3% --% -23%

4.4% F2012-14E

° 1 one +$2,470 -$410 -$2,880

2.4% F2015-20E pp +6% 1% -46%
+$4,940 -$820 -$5,760

ZiRB= +13% 2% 92%

Note: pps is percentage point(s). $ amount and % changes in revenue / spending / deficit are over the entire F2011-F2020E
KP period. Source: CBO, “The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2010 to 2020,” 8/10.
(@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 358

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021020
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028041.txt,"the fact that one of our new neighbors was a friend from my first military
intelligence stint in the kirva. In almost paralyzing pain, Nava phoned him, and
he rushed her to the hospital. It turned out that the doctor who delivered Anat
had left part of the placenta inside. Once the mistake was discovered — as I was
again speeding north — he went back in and rectified it. When I arrived, I was
relieved, to put it mildly, to find Nava smiling bravely, and on her way back to
full health. Still, doctor friends of mine told me that if the problem not been
diagnosed and addressed quickly, she could have suffered shock, serious
infection, even death.

In my new role, I was nominally responsible to both the defense minister and
the chief of staff, but Arik made it clear to both me and Raful that he was boss.
And though my official brief was longer-term planning, almost from day-one
the issue of Lebanon overshadowed all others. I knew, from Cinerama, that
preparations for a possible military operation in Lebanon were underway. Yet
from my first meeting with Arik and Raful, it became clear it was more than just
a possibility. “Why the hell is Arafat still alive,” Arik snapped at us. He said
that when he’d been commander of Unit 101, he’d never waited for the
government to ask him to plan an operation. He’d plan it himself, and go to
ministers for approval. When I told him that I’d done just that when I was
commander of the sayeret, only to be told Arafat was “not a target,” Arik
replied: well, he is now. The PLO leader’s current residence was on the
southern edge of Beirut, and in the weeks ahead Arik left no doubt that he
meant to go after him there.

To anyone looking from the outside, there was no pressing reason to expect a
war. It is true that the potential for conflict was always there. The PLO had
nearly 20,000 fighters in Lebanon and hundreds of rockets capable of reaching
our northern towns and settlements. The Syrians were there, too. As part of an
Arab League agreement in 1976 to quell two years of terrible civil war between
Lebanon’s traditionally dominant Maronite Christians and an alliance of PLO
and Lebanese Muslim forces, some 30,000 Syrian troops had been brought in as
the core of a peacekeeping force. But in the summer of 1981, new US President
Ronald Reagan’s Mideast envoy, Undersecretary of State Philip Habib, had

193
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028041
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031041.txt,"communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031041
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027399.txt,"Is Inv

GUID:

itation: No

86358BD0-C747-4766-8E55

Let me think

Messag

Sender
Time:
Flags:
Is Rea
Is Inv
GUID:

Messag

Sender
Time:
Flags:
Is Rea
Is Inv
GUID:
Messag
Let's
Sender
Time:
Flags:
Is Rea
Is Inv
GUID:

Messag

Sender

: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

about.

08/20/18 04:19:01 PM (5

1085445

d: No

itation: No

443420018D1F

Is he bringing his wife?

56499941)

7722349B-057D-436C-BEE6

9F21E5782723

e: He is the only person allowed

08/20/18 04:19:48 PM (5

1060865

d: Yes

itation: No

56499988)

FBOCCE67-2F82-4]

e: I gotcha. Ok I will come solo.

discuss how

E.75-BBA8

08/20/18 04:20:05 PM (5

1060865

d: Yes

itation: No

4B763159-74B7-475C-A44D-C2BBO07D2A

E7D51319CDE1

56500005)

|
co
Ne}

e: McGahn effed over Trump.

Time:
Flags:
Is Rea
Is Inv
GUID:

Messag

Sender
Time:

Flags:
Is Rea
Is Inv

GUID:

: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

08/20/18 04:20:23 PM (5

1085445

d: No

itation: No

56500023)

1F6120B0-43CE-4BA1-926F-071D64A68F17

e: Will he stay

?

08/20/18 04:21:47 PM (5

1060865

d: Yes

itation: No

93251A12-8325-4A44-9AC6-526E

56500107)

r
OV
r,

IEF89C7

I some point I need to make peace with Bannon.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027399
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014487.txt,"Chart 58: The dip in UK policy risk is likely to be short lived if the Govt keeps to its commitment to
trigger A50 in Q1 without providing clarity on its negotiating position

1200

4000 ———UK Economic Policy Uncertainty

=== (German Economic Policy Uncertainty

800

600

400

200

0

1997
1998
1999
2000
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009

2001
2002
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

Source: Bloomberg

Building inflationary pressures point to post-Christmas consumer squeeze

The third act in waiting for Brexit is cost-push inflation from the fall in GBP. So far,
consumer spending has held up far better than most expected, especially retail spending
by the over 50s. But there is evidence the inflationary canary is starting to sing. The
charts below show that the move in CPI has lagged sharp rises in manufacturing output
prices, utility prices and food prices in the past two months.

Chart 59: Firms report sharp increases in Chart 60: Chunky utility price increases on the
output prices horizon
66.0 140 ques Natural gas price, 6 90

45

month forward, %
62.0 120 12mi12m AO
. 100 ques Natural gas price, spot,
% 12m/12m 35
58.0 80 con 30
emus CP! utilities, % yoy (ths)
60 25
54.0
20
40 45
50.0 20
10
46.0 0 5
eee anufacturing output prices -20 0
420 (PMI, lagged 3 months) 40 5
ee |ndustrial goods inflation {rhs}
el a a a a a 60 “18
— oO wo Mn~ @ ~~ oO WO mM
See sesesegags SSsese es S&S & S&S
A St SON s NN Na nanan an
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Markit, ONS. Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, ONS, Bloomberg

To understand this delay it is worth remembering “Marmitegate” and the pressure put
on companies not to raise the prices of household brands. The incident also illustrates
the margin pressure building up in the system and challenges posed to producers,
vendors and consumers as to who will absorb the higher costs. According to the
Chairman of the UK Food and Drink Federation many companies may be waiting until
post-Christmas to change prices, which lan Wright estimates could rise as much as 8%.
If that happens at the same time as power prices hit seasonal highs, the consumer could
Start to feel the pinch.

To avoid this leading to a contraction in demand, workers we would need to see strong
nominal wage growth. However, the Institute of Fiscal Studies does not expect real
wages to return to 2008 levels until 2021. The tightness of the UK labour market could
also cushion any blow, but we note jobless claims have started to rise again and
businesses may be less likely to hire if uncertainty, for reasons outlined above, picks up
again.

Chart 61: Food prices are key to watch

14
49 CPI food prices,
BAML forecast, %
10 yoy
Food input prices,
8 % yoy; lagged 3
6 months {rhs}
4
2
0
-2
A
6

SE Or MWK, @D
nomeoaeecededad
oOo om Q

TT TNN NNN

Food input prices calculated as an average of domestically
produced and imported food. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research,
ONS.

—
a3
N

2013
2015
2017

28 European Equity Strategy | 01 December 2016

BankofAmerica <2”
Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014487
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015941.txt,"Software 251

Can humans solve ‘unsolvable’ problems?

The question of whether Fermat’s Last Theorem could be solved
mechanically remained unanswered until 1970 when Yuri Matiyasevich
filled in the missing piece in Julia Robinson's proof. Matiyasevich used
an ingenious reduction method to match up sequences in Robinson's
theorem with a set of Turing machines. This showed that if Robinson's
theorem was false you could solve the halting problem and since you
can't solve the halting problem, then Robinson's theorem must be true.
All this effort proved Diophantine equations have no general algorithmic
solution. This was a hugely important result but, as we noted earlier,
Fermat’s Last Theorem is not, strictly speaking, a Diophantine. It is an
exponential Diophantine equation. We still had no definitive answer to
Fermat.

In 1972 Keijo Ruohonen and again in 1993, Christoph Baxa
demonstrated that Diophantine equations with exponential terms could
be rewritten as regular Diophantine equations with one additional
complication — the necessity of adding an infinite set of terms to the end
of the equation. In 1993, J.P. Jones of the University of Calgary showed the
logic limit for regular Diophantine equations lies at thirteen unknowns.
Matiyasevich had already pointed this out but never completed his proof.
Since infinity is greater than thirteen, all exponential Diophantine
equations are above the logic limit and, therefore, undecidable. Finally,
we have a proof that Fermat’s Last Theorem is unsolvable by a computer

— or at least by a general purpose algorithm running on a computer.
Matiyasevich went on to show many mathematical problems can be
rewritten as exponential Diophantine equations and that much of
mathematics is undecidable. For example, the Four Color Conjecture:

“Given an arbitrary map on a Euclidean plane, show the map can
be colored in a maximum of four colors such that no adjacent area
shares the same color.”

Meanwhile, Andrew Wiles, an English mathematics Professor at
Princeton had been secretly working on Fermat’s Last Theorem. When
I say secretly, he had not told anyone in his department, and only told
his wife late in 1993 when he suspected he might have a solution. He
had been working on the problem a long time, having fallen in love with
it at the age of 8! In 1995, after nearly 30 years work, he announced he

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015941
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032928.txt,"On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , ican organize. anytime with wife your
call. otherwise new york dec.6-9? \

interesting times. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-
use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Ken Starr (a wrote:

Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you?

Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

any new york plans

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032928
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017388.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

I also knew that our Constitution said some things about religion. In our Yeshiva we learned
mostly about the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of religion. But I started to read a
little more about the Constitution and quickly learned that there were three references to religion
in that great document of liberty. The first, in the body of the original Constitution, declared that
“no religious test shall ever be required” for holding office under the United States. Wow, is this
really true? I wondered, then why hasn’t there been a Jewish president? And why is there only
one “Jewish seat” on the Supreme Court? It sure sounded to me like religious tests were being
applied in fact, although it was unconstitutional to do so. This got me to thinking about the
difference between the law as written and practiced.

I also discovered that the First Amendment, in addition to guaranteeing freedom of religion, had
an awkwardly phrased guarantee which I did not understand: “Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion.” There were two words I didn’t understand. What does
“respecting” mean? I had always used it to suggest a positive attitude—respect—toward others.
Clearly it had a different meaning in the First Amendment, something like “regarding.” Second,
what did the word “establishment” mean? I simply had no idea and so I began to do some
research. The answer was anything but simple and the meaning of the term is still not completely
clear to me after 60 years of thinking, writing and teaching about it.

So there was some upside for me in the words “under God” being added to our pledge. It not
only got me thinking, it got me arguing with my friends and even with some of my teachers. It’s
an ongoing argument...

The downside, which was evident to me even back then, was that whatever the words prohibiting
an establishment of religion meant, they seemed incomparable with compelling every school boy
to declare his belief in a God inserted into the pledge by Congress. So, although I believed in
God (or more likely never thought about any alternative), I decided never to say the words. I
continued to recite the old pledge, confident that it was I, and not those who amended the pledge,
who were being patriotic and faithful to the meaning of our Constitution. I guess I was an early
Originalist in that regard, since my reading suggested to me that Jefferson and Madison would not
have approved of making young kids declare a belief in God.”

Flashing forward a generation, my oldest son Elon, had a similar epiphany in 1970, when my
family moved to California for a year so that I could take up residency in The Center For
Advanced Study of Behavioral Sciences at Stanford. We enrolled our kids in a Palo Alto Public
School and my 8 year old son Elon got into trouble for refusing to recite the words “under God”
in the pledge. When he came home from school, I asked him how come he had just noticed the
words under God, since his elementary school in Cambridge also required periodic recitations of
the pledge. He told me that we were at war in Vietnam and he thought the words—pronounced
with a Boston accent—were “under guard.” It was only a California teacher writing the words on
the blackboard that revealed to him that he was being required to take a pledge that included
God. By this time I knew that the Supreme Court had ruled that a religious objector could not be
required to recite the pledge, because, as the justices put it:

°° Nor would the composer of the original pledge who was an early socialist.

301

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017388
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023295.txt,"having fun.

Date: Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:53 AM

Subject:

To: Melanie Spinella

25 minutes needed. 1 new and vastly improved plan, needs your thoughtful input. decisions on legacy
paintings bronzes. books etc. 2. we need to reach fee agreement. and authorities.( alan and I spent time over
the weekend, ) , hundred documents to be drafted. 3. gagosiaon 4 revolver .5 inspire - FBI

. 6. Phaidon, solution. 7 plane. no need to reinvent the wheel. . ( rowen ).

Date: Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:41 PM

Subject: Fwd: Loan
To: Melanie Spinel ii
Please talk to him

Date: Tuesday, 24 November 2015

Subject: Loan

To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Cc: Melanie Spinella

, ""Alan S. Halperin’ Ada Clapp
Joe Avantario
Jeffrey-given the high daily interest cost (50k+/-) on $$ borrowed which you pointed out yesterday, here's what
I'm thinking, but I want to be 100% on the same page as you:

1. Close next monday on the credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, of course push closing back but my
preference wld be to close.)

2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees is reviewing apol and apo-ol. While
probably not impt on a ""substantive"" basis it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely good for leon.

3. We are hoping to have signature pages to the trustees (and returned to us) by early to mid next week. (Ada
will oversee.)

4. We will then get the new trust to bofa who, moving quickly (according to them), will have an acct open the
following week, 12/7-9.

5. We need to manage execution of paperwork associated with decanting which I assume occurs once apo-ol
and bank acct are operative. (Ada I'm sure you'll be on top of this).

6. assume we will move $$ to pay down loan the day or day after (?) apo-01 bank acct open. As you know we
cld do this as early as next monday/tuesday but then cash will be sitting in apo-1 while we're waiting for apo-01
bank acct.

7. If there are sales of assets (or Ilc's) from leon to apol or apo-01 that needs to be buttoned down and
organized asap.

8. Same if you want another NEW trust in the mix as that will involve paperwork and opening an acct with
bank.

Let's discuss to make sure we're on the same page on process. B

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Date: Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:21 PM

Subject: agenda

To: Melanie Spinella

1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10
mill and maybe more. 3. ican walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference
and maybe made it worse. 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art
distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. (alan ) pent. ( with
follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you
calculate. Ican explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to
start.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023295
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015799.txt,"The Brain 109

Input

4 Retinal rods and cones

Pulvinar
Lateral geniculate body
Superior Colliculus
Medial geniculate body

Cortex of Occipital Lobes

Visual Processing System

brain. The impulses split and form two distinct paths, one through the
cerebral cortex, which gives us the sensation of conscious vision, and the
other into the lower brain which provides us with instinctive reactions.

The right hand side of your body is connected to the left hemisphere
of the brain and vice versa. This means each hand is controlled by the
opposite side of the brain. But, your eyes see both your hands. To resolve
this conundrum a very complex thing has to happen to the optic nerve in
the center of the brain. The optic nerve from each eye splits and crosses
over in the middle, so the left side of the left eye and the left side of the
right eye goes to the right hand side of the brain and vice versa. This
keeps the brain focused on the correct hand.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015799
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016290.txt,"DISSIDENT MESSAGES
Jaan Tallinn

Jaan Tallin, a computer programmer, theoretical physicist, and investor, is a co-
developer of Skype and Kazaa.

In March 2009, I found myself in a bland franchise eatery next to a noisy California
freeway. I was there to meet a young man whose blog I had been following. To make
himself recognizable, he wore a button with a text on it: Speak the truth even if your voice
trembles. His name was Eliezer Yudkowsky, and we spent the next four hours discussing
the message he had for the world—a message that had brought me to that eatery and
would end up dominating my subsequent work.

The First Message: the Soviet Occupation

In The Human Use of Human Beings, Norbert Wiener looked at the world through the
lens of communication. He saw a universe that was marching to the tune of the second
law of thermodynamics toward its inevitable heat death. In such a universe, the only
(meta)stable entities are messages—patterns of information that propagate through time,
like waves propagating across the surface of a lake. Even we humans can be considered
messages, because the atoms in our bodies are too fleeting to attach our identities to.
Instead, we are the “message” that our bodily functions maintain. As Wiener put it: “It is
the pattern maintained by this homeostasis, which is the touchstone of our personal
identity.”

I’m more used to treating processes and computation as the fundamental building
blocks of the world. That said, Wiener’s lens brings out some interesting aspects of the
world which might otherwise have remained in the background and which to a large
degree shaped my life. These are two messages, both of which have their roots in the
Second World War. They started out as quiet dissident messages—messages that people
didn’t pay much attention to, even if they silently and perhaps subconsciously concurred.
The first message was: Zhe Soviet Union is composed of a series of illegitimate
occupations. These occupations must end.

As an Estonian, I grew up behind the Iron Curtain and had a front row seat when
it fell. I heard this first message in the nostalgic reminiscences of my grandparents and in
between the harsh noises jamming the Voice of America. It grew louder during the
Gorbachev era, as the state became more lenient in its treatment of dissidents, and
reached a crescendo in the Estonian Singing Revolution of the late 1980s.

In my teens, I witnessed the message spread out across widening circles of
people, starting with the active dissidents, who had voiced it for half a century at great
cost to themselves, proceeding to the artists and literati, and ending up among the Party
members and politicians who had switched sides. This new elite comprised an eclectic
mix of people: those original dissidents who had managed to survive the repression,
public intellectuals, and (to the great annoyance of the surviving dissidents) even former
Communists. The remaining dogmatists—even the prominent ones—were eventually
marginalized, some of them retreating to Russia.

Interestingly, as the message propagated from one group to the next, it evolved. It
started in pure and uncompromising form (“The occupation must end!”) among the
dissidents who considered the truth more important than their personal freedom. The

70

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016290
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030797.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 8/20/2018 2:34:11 AM 
To: Steve Bannon 
Subject: Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive I News & Observer 
any ideas ? 
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Steve Bannon 
Exactly 
wrote: 
But somebody big has u in the gunsights 
On Aug 19, 2018, at 10:27 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
yes . no worry, november too important to risk diversion, mission first 
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Steve Bannon wrote: 
Yes 
but let's discuss--their is a crazed jihad against u--ive never seen anything like it--and I've seen a lot 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
From: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:38 -0400 
To: Steve Bannon____________________ 
Subject: Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive 1News & Observer 
AHHHH thats more like it „ we need to find you the exorcist hat. ! . do you think you might want to 
come to europe? 
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Steve Bannon wrote: 
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article216997195.html 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030797 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030798 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019934.txt,"s)

JARVANKA

n the Sunday after the immigration order was issued, Joe Scarborough and his cohost
() on the MSNBC show Morning Joe, Mika Brzezinski, came for lunch at the White
House.

Scarborough is a former Republican congressman from Pensacola, Florida, and
Brzezinski is the daughter of Zbigniew Brzezinski, a high-ranking aide in the Johnson
White House and Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor. Morning Joe had gone on the
air in 2007 and developed a following among New York political and media types. Trump
was a longtime devotee.

Early in the 2016 campaign, with a change of leadership at NBC News, it seemed
likely that the show, its ratings falling, would be canceled. But Scarborough and
Brzezinski embraced their relationship with Trump and became one of the few media
outlets not only with a positive outlook on him, but that seemed to know his thinking.
Trump became a frequent call-in guest and the show a way to speak more or less directly
to him.

It was the kind of relationship Trump dreamed of: media people who took him
seriously, talked about him often, solicited his views, provided him with gossip, and
retailed the gossip he offered them. The effect was to make them all insiders together,
which was exactly where Trump wanted to be. Though he branded himself as a political
outsider, actually finding himself on the outside wounded him.

Trump believed that the media, which he propelled (in the case of Scarborough and
Brzezinski, helping them keep their jobs), owed him something, and the media, giving him
vast amounts of free coverage, believed he owed them, with Scarborough and Brzezinski
seeing themselves as something like semiofficial advisers, if not the political fixers who
had put him in his job.

In August, they had had a public spat, resulting in Trump’s tweet: “Some day, when
things calm down, I'll tell the real story of @JoeNBC and his very insecure long-time
girlfriend, @morningmika. Two clowns!” But Trump’s spats often ended in a tacit

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019934
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013979.txt,"http://spanish.about.com
http://german.about.com
http://french.about.com

68. The dollar figures in this chapter are all from a period immediately following President Bush’s
reelection in 2004, which correlated to the worst dollar exchange rates of the last 20 years.

69. I refer, of course, to the amazing bike-riding opportunities and famous pastries.
70. Coined by Joel Stein of the LA Times.

71. By all means, go ahead and take a post-office celebratory trip and go nuts for a few weeks. I know
I did. Rock on. Ibiza and glow sticks here I come. Have some absinthe and drink lots of water.
Following that, sit down and plan an introspective mini-retirement.

72. Muses are low maintenance but often expensive in one or both of two tactical areas:
manufacturing and advertising. Shop for providers of both that are willing to accept credit cards as
payment, and negotiate this up front if necessary by saying, “Rather than trying to negotiate you down
on pricing, I just ask that you accept payment by credit card. If you can do that, we’ll choose you over
Competitor X.” This is yet another example of a “firm offer,” and not a question, that puts you in a
stronger negotiating position. For a detailed explanation of how I multiply points for travel using
concepts like “piggybacking” and “recycling,” search for both terms on www.fourhourblog.com.

73. To see a video of how I pack to travel the world with less than 10 pounds, click on “travel” at
www .fourhourblog.com.
74. Founder of www.nileproject.com.

75. http://www.usc.edu/hsc/dental/opfs/SC/indexSC html.
76. Brazilian shantytowns. See the movie City of God (Cidade de Deus) to get a taste of how fun
these are.

77. This is a serious step and should not be taken with those you do not trust. In this case, it helps
because your accountant can then sign tax documents or checks in your name instead of consuming
hours and days of your time with faxes, scanners, and expensive international FedEx’ing of
documents.

78. There are also services like www.earthclassmail.com, which will receive, scan, and e-mail all of
your non-junk mail to you as PDFs.

79. This would be used if you leave your computer at home or in someone else’s home while
traveling. This step can be skipped if you bring your computer, but that is like a recovering heroin
addict bringing a bag of opium to rehab. Don’t tempt yourself to kill time instead of rediscovering it.

80. “Unlocked” means that it is recharged with prepaid cards instead of being on a monthly payment
plan with a single carrier such as O2 or Vodafone. This also means that the same phone can be used
with carriers in other countries (assuming the frequency is the same) with a simple switch of the SIM
memory card for $10-30 U.S. in most cases. Some U.S.-compatible quad-band phones can use SIM
cards.

15)

Filling the Void

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013979
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031489.txt,"From: Stephen Hanson_________________ 
Sent: Fri 10/7/2016 10:30:45 PM (UTC) 
To: 
Subject: 
Jeffrey / E / Epstein[jeevacation©gmail.com] 
Fwd: Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women 
in a 2005 recording, saying, ""When you're a star they let you do it"" 
Ouch 
Sent from my iPad 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: NYTimes.com News Alert <nytdirect@nytimes.com> 
Date: October 7, 2016 at 5:40:40 PM EDT 
To: 
Subject: Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping 
women in a 2005 recording, saying, ""When you're a star they let you do it"" 
Add nytdirect@nytimes.com to your address book. 
October 07, 2016 
Breaking News Alert 
NYTimes.com » 
BREAKING NEWS 
Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms 
about groping women in a 2005 
recording, saying, When you're a 
star they let you do it 
Friday, October 7, 2016 5:28 PM EDT 
Donald J. Trump was caught on tape bragging in vulgar terms about making sexual 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031489 
advances toward a married woman, and aggressively kissing and groping other 
women. 
The remarkable recording, unearthed by The Washington Post on Friday, was made 
in 2005 on the set of a soap opera where Mr. Trump was making a cameo 
appearance. Mr. Trump was captured on an open microphone that he apparently did 
not know was recording his conversation with Billy Bush, then the host of ""Access 
Hollywood,"" with whom he was sitting on a bus. 
Read more »  
ADVERTISEMENT 
FOLLOW NYTimes 
FACEBOOK 
@NYTimes 
Get more NYTimes.com newsletters » 
Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our 
NYTimes apps for just $0.99. Subscribe » 
ABOUT THIS EMAIL 
You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Breaking News Alerts newsletter. 
Unsubscribe Manage Subscriptions Change Your Email Privacy Policy Contact Advertise 
Copyright 2015 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031490 
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032338.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Richard Kahn_____________________________ 
11/9/2016 3:44:39 AM 
Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Trump 
Importance: High 
Shocked but you seem to be right on don't count him out. Trump victory looking good and these pollsters 
like fools... 
Markets getting hit. Dow futures -700 
Richard Kahn 
HBRK Associates Inc. 
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor 
New York, NY 10022 
Tel 
Fax 
Ce1,11111111111111—
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032338 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029247.txt,"Whether you donated to Poetry in America through Filmmaker’s Collaborative (our 501c3 fiscal
sponsor), through Harvard, or through WGBH; whether you appeared on camera or talked an
elusive friend into appearing on camera to discuss a poem; whether you lent us your film crew, or
provided overnight use of your hotel suite or apartment or of your whole skyscraper; whether you
highlighted our work on your stage, or talked your colleagues into becoming corporate sponsors;
whether you flew to Boston to install state-of-the-art editing and video storage equipment, or
asked your children’s school to let us film there; whether you encouraged your family foundation
to take an interest in the project, or gave us a lesson in IP, in licensing, in the rudiments of
finance, or of distribution; whether you praised, or gave timely, much-needed criticism— you
enabled what we have done.

Here’s what we have to report, and to show, a year later, thanks to your help. Links offer sneak
peeks of works -in-progress across the full portfolio of Poetry in America projects.

e The first eight-episode season of the public television series Poetry in America (a co-
production between WGBH, Emmy Award-winning filmmaker David Grubin, and my own new
production company, Verse Video), is now fully funded and in production, with episodes featuring
Bill Clinton, Herbie Hancock and Sonia Sanchez _on Langston Hughes, Frank Gehry on Carl
Sandburg, Katie Couric on Elizabeth Bishop, Nas on Whitman, and many more scheduled for
nationwide launch in 2017.

¢« Poetry in America’s many initiatives to reach Middle and High School teachers and their
students are taking root. Our first online course for Middle and High School Teachers, Poetry of
the City, will launch this Spring with the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Companion
materials to this course will be made available for free on PBS LearningMedia. This course is
designed to meet the needs of English Language Arts and Social Studies teachers in the US and
internationally.

e« Weare eager to begin production of The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky. Designed, too, for
Middle and High School teachers, The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky will draw English Language
Arts instruction into dialogue with science, and will include extraordinary footage of the natural
world, conversations with poets, scholars, and scientists as well as footage shot in class and in
the field with great teachers.

e Arecent partnership with Greenwich Country Day School and the Success Academy Network
of charter schools will provide a base for the production of a new collection of classroom-ready
educational material on The Poetry of Art, Sport, and Play. This collection will include
discussions on poems filmed everywhere from sports fields to Broadway theaters, and will feature
dancers, athletes, fashion designers, and more.

e With a growing archive of footage capturing teachers and students reading American poems,
we are eager to expand our reach and move into America’s schools, disseminating,
testing, and learning from teachers and students using our materials. We hope to be able to
begin work evaluating the impact of poetry on literacy levels and character development and,
eventually, to produce a full suite of materials that foster character development along with
intellectual growth.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029247
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019305.txt,"From: Steve Bannon 
Sent: 7/22/2018 11:58:18 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Fw: 
Importance: High 
Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
From: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200 
To: < 
Subject: Re: Fw: 
9th circle 
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM Steve Bannon < > wrote: 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
From: Benjamin Harnwell< 
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200 
To: Steve Bannon<I 
Subj ect: Re: 
Bannon the European: He's opening the populist fort in Brussels 
The former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with ""The Movement"". Objective: an alliance between 
right-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections 
NEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru who 
was Donald Trump's right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following the racist 
violence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the Daily Beast 
himself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (II Movimento), right in the heart of Europe 
and its institutions. Through which he hopes to coordinate the populist right in view of the European 
elections which will be held in spring 2019. 
Objective: to compete with George Soros, the American billionaire of Hungarian origin, benefactor of 
the Democratic party, who since 1984 with his Open Society has spent at least $32 billion in support of 
NGOs dealing with human rights. And for this he became the bogeyman of the populist right, accused of 
plots of all kinds: including that of wanting to replace Italians with immigrants in order to have labour at 
low cost. A mantra repeated in the past on Twitter also by the current Minister of the Interior Matteo 
Salvini. 
The ambition of Steve Bannon, former director of the alt-right American site Breitbart — which in the 
European campaign preceded him since the platform had already opened bureaux in London and Rome 
— is therefore to become the coordinator of the one great ""populist international"" of which he has long 
since been dreaming. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 019305 
The Movement, in fact, intends to function as an extreme right-wing think tank: a source of strategic 
advice to channel the not-so-politically structured discontent of the most extreme European movements. 
Analysing data and giving strategic advice. But also by raising funds and channeling funding. 
The aim is to create a populist alliance, a sort of ""super group"" that if victorious can conquer up to a 
third of the European Parliament in the elections next May. 
Indeed — putting the common policy of the Old Continent in the hands of Bannon and his own. The 
American strategist is very attached to the Freedom Caucus — the extreme right of the US Congress — 
and in 2014 he was at the top of the Cambridge Analytica company, which in 2016 used data stolen from 
Facebook to try to influence the presidential election from which Donald Trump emerged victor. It is not 
a mystery that for a long time he courts nationalists of the right from East to West. And he has already 
met, among others, the Hungarian Orban, the French Marine Le Pen and the former leader of the British 
separatists Nigel Farage. The latter reappeared, coincidentally, on Friday in Pennsylvania, USA, to a 
fundraiser in favor of the Republican congressman Lou Barletta. Without forgetting the Italians of Lega 
and 5 stars. Of them, he said: ""If it works in Italy, we can import the model anywhere"". 
The Movement, which for now will count on a staff of 10 people, will be fully operational in 2019. In 
short, after the American midterm elections, where Bannon is fighting to influence the primaries 
supporting candidates potentially able to undermine the prospects of Republican establishment. But in 
the future the former spin doctor says he wants to spend more and more time in Europe. Also because 
the relationships with Trump have worsened after the revelations he made to Michael Wolff and 
published in the scandal book ""Fire and Fury"". ""Better to reign in Hell than to serve in Paradise,"" 
Bannon says now paraphrasing the Satan of one of his favorite books, John Milton's Lost Paradise. Hell 
in this case would be the dear old Europe and its democratic values. The ""army of darkness"" is already 
among us. 
In Sacratissimo Corde Iesu et Purissimo Corde Mariae et Castissimo Corde Ioseph. 
******* 
Benjamin Harnwell 
Founder and President of the Board of Trustees 
Dignitatis Humanae Institute 
Cell:• 
Office: 
Istituto Dignitatis Humanae 
44 Via delle Fornaci  
Roma 00165  
ITALY  
@ben harnwell 
www.dignitatishumanae.com 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 019306 
II giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38, Steve Bannon W ha scritto: 
What does this say??? 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Maria Luisa ' 
Date: July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT 
To: Steve Bannon < >, Preate Alexandra 
<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg> 
Sent from my iPhone 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 019307 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028866.txt,"From: Kathy Ruemmler 
Sent: 9/19/2014 7:44:17 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
Gov is not jewish 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
reid or governor 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Kathy Ruemmler < 
Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair. 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
double whoops 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <______________________ 
Yep. And now he is a repeat offender. 
On Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kathy Ruemmler < 
Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts. 
On Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM, ""Kathy Ruemmler"" <> wrote: 
> wrote: 
> wrote: 
wrote: 
Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC 
today, back in NY on Sunday morning. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in 
surgery, and the 
""cook"" well' -- he can wait 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kathy Ruemmler <____________________________> wrote: 
Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage 
all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick 
of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
""girls?""„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, 
jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( 
gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome 
guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate 
summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kathy Ruemmler • wrote: 
Most girls do not have to worry about this crap. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. 
and financial 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028866 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Kathy Ruemmler <_______________________ 
Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him. 
Sent from my iPad 
On Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
You need to talk to boss 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
> wrote: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028867 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028868 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028869 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010776.txt,"Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case No.: CACE 15-000072

Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records

Page 20 of 20

COUNSEL LIST

Sigrid Stone McCawley, Esquire
smccawley@bsfllp.com;
sperkins@bsfllp.com; ftleserve@bsfllp.com
Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP

401 E Las Olas Boulevard., Suite 1200

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: (954)-356-0011

Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire

Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr., Esquire
Thomas.scott@csklegal.com;
Steven.safra@csklegal.com;
Renee.nail@csklegal.com;
shelly.zambo@csklegal.com

Cole Scott & Kissane P.A.

9150 S Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400
Miami, FL 33156

Phone: (305)-350-5329/Fax: (305)-373-2294
Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire

Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire

staff. efile@pathtojustice.com;
brad@pathtojustice.com;
maria@pathtojustice.com

Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos &
Lehrman, P.L.

425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: (954)-524-2820/Fax: (954)-524-2822
Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire

Kenneth A. Sweder, Esquire
ksweder@sweder-ross.com

Sweder & Ross, LLP

131 Oliver Street

Boston, MA 02110

Phone: (617)-646-4466/Fax: (617)-646-4470
Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire

Ashley Eiler, Esquire
AEiler@wileyrein.com

Mary E. Borja, Esquire
MBorja@wileyrein.com

Richard A. Simpson, Esquire
RSimpson@wileyrein.com

Wiley Rein, LLP

1776 K Street NW

Washington, DC 20006

Phone: (202)-719-4252/Fax: (202)-719-7049
Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire

Joni J. Jones, Esquire

jonijones@utah.gov

Assistant Utah Attorney General

160 E3008

Salt Lake City, UT 84114

Phone: (801)-366-0100/Fax: (801)-366-0101
Attorneys for Paul Cassell

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010776
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029521.txt,"Palm House Robert Matthews EB-5 Clintons Trump Tony Bennett https://therealdeal.com/miami/issues_articles/lost-paradise-at-th...

2 of 10

MHyoo

~ ""SOUTH FLORIDA REAL ESTATE NEWS
Q SUBSCRIBE MY ACCOUNT

in EB-5 funding for personal expenses, including the purchase of a 151-foot yacht

named “Alibi” and his own debt payments.

Matthews and the project’s general contractor, Nicholas Laudano, recently pleaded
guilty to fraud charges in federal court, while the 91 EB-5 backers lost their $500,000

investments and never received their green cards.

The EB-5 regional center in charge of marketing the Palm House project and
soliciting the investments, however, has not been criminally charged. The South
Atlantic Regional Center (SARC) and its director, Joseph Walsh Sr., were allegedly
able to siphon nearly $9.5 million of the foreign investors’ money, according to a civil

complaint filed by the SEC in federal court.
To date, Walsh has only been charged civilly. He was allegedly even found recently

trying to solicit other EB-5 investors for another hotel project in Miami Beach, per a

lawsuit filed in Palm Beach County.

“This is the most egregious fraud case I have ever seen,” said attorney David George,
of George Gesten McDonald PLLC, who's representing EB-5 investors in the Palm

House lawsuit.

Regional centers like SARC function as middlemen between Robert

Matthews

developers and their foreign investors. But despite the key role
they play in the EB-5 process, there’s minimal regulation over

how they operate and few safeguards to protect investors.

The current system, critics say, is a petri dish for fraud that

allows bad actors to come and go — in many cases with no
criminal prosecutions. At the same time, lobbyists for the real

estate industry have pushed to ensure these rules remain in place.

“No one is watching the regional centers,’ said Doug Litowitz, a Chicago attorney who

was not involved in the Palm House lawsuit but represents Chinese clients in other

6/26/19, 11:57 AM

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029521
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030070.txt,"11

Jordan also fell in the rankings of the highly respected Transparency
International Corruptions Perceptions Index from 37 (1 being the
least corrupt in about 180 countries studied) in 2003 to 50 in 2010. It
is clear that Jordan's political establishment has no interest in
implementing the king's explicit orders to move ahead on political
reform and, in most cases, took measures that set the process back.
The uprisings that Jordan is A Decade of Struggling Reform Efforts
in Jordan: The Resilience of the Rentier System witnessing today are
not all instigated by groups that are seeking reform in the traditional
liberal sense. Some are led by groups that support the rentier-system
model-the source of many of their livelihoods-and are concerned that
the state may move away from such a system. The king's own policies
on political reform-often aimed at striking a balance between the
traditional elements and the reformers-have not borne fruit, and
almost always resulted in appeasing traditional elements at the
expense of reform. Reform needs reformers who are cognizant of the
need for an orderly, gradual process but are also committed to a
serious roadmap that would lead to true power-sharing through
strong legislative and judicial bodies. The selection of several prime
ministers did not lead to serious progress on reform, precisely
because they were neither true believers in its value, nor did they
have a critical mass of reformers inside their governments able to
counterbalance the traditional elements who wanted to preserve the
status quo at all costs. Thus, instead of holistically addressing all
needed areas of reform, reform programs were instead reduced to ad-
hoc initiatives that did not add up to any serious and structural
changes in governance systems. The king's practice of handing a
prime minister a plan for reform that the latter does not believe in and
expecting him to deliver on it regardless has simply failed. The
National Agenda, an example of such a holistic and gradual program
to move toward a more inclusive and democratic system, was never

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030070
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011468.txt,"United States v. West, 58 F.3d 133, 141 (Sth Cir, 1995) oie eseesecseesseeeseessceeseeeneeeseeeseeenaeenes 22
United States v. Wexler, 79 F.2d 526, 529-30 (2d Cir. 1935) oo... seeeccessessseeseeereeeseeeneeesneeseeenaeenes 33

United States v. Wilson, No. 04-CR-1016 NGG, 2013 WL 2948034, at *4-6 (E.D.N.Y. June 14,
105) 32

World Wide Ass’n of Specialty Programs y. Pure, Inc., 450 F.3d 1132, 1138 (10th Cir. 2006)... 3

Zamora v. GC Servs., L.P., 647 F. App’x 330 (Sth Cir. 2016) 0... ce seescecseessecseeseeeseesseesseeeseeesaes 9
Rules

Fed. R. Evid. 403 oo... cccesscseesseseesessessessesessessenevseesessesessacsecnessecnesaeseeseessesseseesesessessessesaeesessessensens 7
Fed. R. Evid. 405 and 608.000... cessesseesessersessesessesseseesecneesecoessecaeseeseenesseestenessessessesaeeees 4,6, 15, 20
Fed. R. Evid. 405(b) 0... ceescesscesscesseesseesseeeseeceecesseeseecnecescesseeeseeeseesseeeseeesaeesseeeeesseeseesseeaees passim
Peds Bs Petts BOY, scccznranswossnnwns aoe va rns nsirecaanre .t tet tat ac 12
Fed. BR; Hwids B01 (QQ) DY swsss.s.10 ssmsesseanesaunns sae aensiseenntesn twat. Axtiaoateansi i .t. ce AO ERIRENOS 29, 31
Fed. R. Evid. 803(6).......c:csscsssscsessessessessesserecscesessevsesaeeecsseaecnesaesaeseessesessseneesessessessesaesenserseaseneaes 19
Fed. R. Evid. 803(8).......sscsccsesseseesessessessesessesseseessesesaceesaessensesecnesaesaesaesseseeseesessesaeesessessessessessensens 8
Fed. R. Evid. 902(4) and 902(11) occ cssesseseseessesesseeecsesecsesaecaessesseseseceneeseesesaessesaesessenseseeneeats 19

Vv

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011468
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022835.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 1/16/2015 6:23:52 PM

To: Michael Wolff as |
Subject: Re: thoughts

today ok.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Michael Wolff <q > wrote:

I don't think I would put her out there. It probably seems too self-serving. But let's discuss. I have an idea about
how to best use. Do you have time to continue our conversation post-3:00 today or tomorrow?

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:36 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never
questioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her
name. however during the entire MM time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me
almost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers
Hs She never saw anything that J} claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the
house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe | and 2 , were local strippers, that
would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a
serious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22
- 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never
on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on
the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. .7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to
bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the
terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked
for underage, that is crazy, .. 8 . [J answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage
people , men women, aged up to 60.

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022835
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016928.txt,"hand on the tiller, exist in a world of energy and forces, as does the helmsman. The weak
forces that control the rudder are as real and physical as the strong forces that toss the
ship. If we shift our cybernetics perspective from the ship to the helmsman, the pressures
on the rudder become a strong force of muscles controlled by the weak signals in the
mind of the helmsman. These messages in the helmsman’s mind are amplified into a
physical force strong enough to steer the ship. Or instead, we can zoom out and take a
large cybernetics perspective. We might see the ship itself as part of a vast trade
network, part of a feedback loop that regulates the price of commodities through the flow
of goods. In this perspective, the tiny ship is merely a messenger. So, the distinction
between the physical world and the information world is a way to describe the
relationship between the weak and the strong.

Wiener chose to view the world from the vantage point and scale of the individual
human. As acyberneticist, he took the perspective of the weak protagonist embedded
within a strong system, trying to make the best of limited powers. He incorporated this
perspective in his very definition of information. “Information,” he said, “is a name for
the content of what is exchanged with the outer world as we adjust to it, and make our
adjustment felt upon it.” In his words, information is what we use to “live effectively
within that environment.” *> For Wiener, information is a way for the weak to effectively
cope with the strong. This viewpoint is also reflected in Gregory Bateson’s definition of
information as “a difference that makes a difference,” by which he meant the small
difference that makes a big difference.

The goal of cybernetics was to create a tiny model of the system using “weak
currents” to amplify and control “strong currents” of the real world. The central insight
was that a control problem could be solved by building an analogous system in the
information space of messages and then amplifying solutions into the larger world of
reality. Inherent in the motion of a control system is the concept of amplification, which
makes the small big and the weak strong. Amplification allows the difference that makes
a difference to make a difference.

In this way of looking at the world, a control system needed to be as complex as
the system it controlled. Cyberneticist W. Ross Ashby proved that this was true in a
precise mathematical sense, in what is now called Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety, or
sometimes the First Law of Cybernetics. The law tells us that to control a system
completely, the controller must be as complex as the controlled. Thus cyberneticists
tended to see control systems as a kind of analog of the systems they governed, like the
homunculus—the hypothetical little person inside the brain who controls the actual
person.

This notion of analogous structure is sometimes confused with the notion of
analog encoding of messages, but the two are logically distinct. Norbert Wiener was
much impressed with Vannevar Bush’s Digital Differential Analyzer, which could be
reconfigured to match the structure of whatever problem it was given to solve but used
digital signal encoding. Signals could be simplified to openly represent the relevant
distinctions, allowing them to be more accurately communicated and stored. In digital
signals, one needed only to preserve the difference in signals that made a difference. It is
this distinction and signal coding that we commonly use to distinguish “analog” versus
“digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in

33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18.

125

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016928
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012161.txt,"KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
same individual had previously fled the home of another neighbor after entering that
house uninvited, when, looking for the bedroom of their 17-year-old daughter, he
mistakenly entered the bedroom of their 14-year-old daughter, touched her on the leg and
startled her awake. State of Florida v. Johnathan Jeffrey Zirulnikoff, Case No. F078646
(June 28, 2007).

After a thorough review by the Miami State Attorney’s Office, and sex-crimes prosecutor
Laura Adams, the investigation revealed that the defendant and both the neighbor’s 17-
year-old daughter and Mr. Sloman’s daughter were previously acquainted. The
defendant was charged with simple trespass in connection with his unauthorized entry
into the neighbor’s house. Jd.

FAUSA Sloman, however, demanded that the young man be registered as a sex offender
and objected to any sentence short of incarceration. The Assistant State Attormey in
charge of the sex-crimes unit reported Mr. Sloman’s conduct during the proceedings as
“outrageous.” The defendant’s attorney described Mr. Sloman as being “out of control.”
Shortly after, Mr. Sloman began publicly deriding the elected State Attorney, his office
and the state process for prosecuting sex offenses, as “‘a joke.”

Unauthorized Tactics in Disregard of the United States Attorney’s Manual are Used

In June 2007, AUSA Villafana subpoenaed the investigating agent of Epstein’s attomey,
Roy Black, in a clear effort to invade the defense camp. The subpoena was specifically
drafted to discover the investigator’s contacts, with all prospective witnesses, Mr. Epstein
and his attorneys.! Not surprisingly, Ms. Villafana issued this subpoena without the
requisite prior approval by the DOJ’s Office of Enforcement Operations. See United
States Attorneys’ Manual, § 9-13.410. When confronted, she misleadingly responded
that she had consulted with the Department of Justice and was not required to obtain
OEO approval because her subpoena was not directed to “an office physically located
within an attorney’s office.” See Tab 18, December 13, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana at
4n.1. This answer clearly suggests that Ms. Villafana had intentionally misled the
Department officials about the items that her subpoena sought.”

The subpoena sought, among other things: “All documents and information related to the nature of the
relationship between [the investigator and/or his firm] and Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, including but not limited to. . .
records of the dates when services were performed . . . telephone logs or records of dates of communications
with Mr. Epstein (or with a third party on Mr. Epstein’s behalf); appointment calendars/datebooks and the like
(whether in hard copy or electronic form) for any period when work was performed on behalf of Mr. Epstein or
when any communication was had with Mr. Epstein (or with a third party on Mr. Epstein’s behalf) . See Tab
17, June 18, 2007 Subpoena to William Riley/ Riley Kiraly, ] 3.

Indeed, we are aware of two other recent instances in which Villafana placed serious misrepresentations before
a court. On July 31, 2007, in the grand-jury litigation arising out of this case, she filed the “Declaration of
Joseph Recarey,” attaching the state detective’s affidavit in support of a search warrant for Epstein’s house. See
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY-64, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla. July 31,
2007). At the time she filed Detective Recarey’s affidavit, she knew it contained numerous material
misrepresentations, including gross misstatements of witness statements and other evidence. Second, we

(Continued...)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012161
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033388.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 4/16/2017 3:12:17 PM
To: Thorbjon Jagland
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

I'll be better I feel terrible having to cut your stay short. There is much going on . Many investigations will

begin
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:04 AM Thorbjon Jagland

> wrote:

Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can
talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another

difficult to understand
T
please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033388
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021975.txt,"“ERSON

e his demise. “It was poor. It
We were very poor. We didn't
id. They had shoes, they had
the war, I discovered the fate of
thers, relatives, and neighbors.
| their minds as they realized
; chamber.”
owed by an international scan-
hundreds of millions of pounds
js and used them to prop up his
ried for conspiracy to commit
But Ghislaine, who had grown
ind counted the Duke of York,
yates, could not escape the dark

king to start fresh, she took the

| Epstein were lovers. “She was
.a longtime friend of Ghislaine'’s.

- more. Ghislaine took care of 4
She managed his household and §
rooklyn-born Jewish boys could ~

ia
ig to lawsuits and witness test> ~

if several women who procured j

ing to people who knew her back ~

in satisty
semed to take pleasure 1 7

ein to a fabulous world that

Oe a =

her father had died, so she was vulnerable, and he contacted her.
He Said, ‘Here’s my number.’

Fitrtuy Ricu

Brooklyn boy knew nothing about. One friend jokes that she
taught Epstein the difference between a fish fork and a salad fork.
But despite—or was it because of? —Maxwell’s devotion to
Epstein, she, too, graduated from girlfriend to friend status.
According to Jane Doe 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, a civil complaint
filed in 2009 by a woman later identified as Virginia Roberts, one
of the services Maxwell provided for Epstein was the procure-
ment of underage women. (Through her lawyer and in court
papers, Maxwell has vehemently denied any involvement with
Virginia, with any other young woman Epstein was involved
with, or with any criminal activities committed by Jeffrey Epstein.
In a 2016 answer to a defamation lawsuit brought by Roberts,
Maxwell called the allegations fabricated for financial gain.)

The case of Nadia Bjorlin, who was thirteen when she was
first noticed by Epstein, raises questions in this regard, at least
in the eyes of her mother.

Bjorlin’s Iranian-born mother spoke to a British tabloid some
years ago about her family’s disturbing experience with Maxwell
and Epstein. Bjorlin’s father, a celebrated conductor of classical
music, had died a year earlier, the mother said. She believed that
this made the girl a vulnerable and easy target.

“She was at school at the famed Interlochen Arts Center, in
Michigan, when she met Epstein,” the mother said.

“My daughter was a singer. She was a baby. She was a skinny

_ little girl, not mature for her age. She was thirteen, but everyone
4 thought she was nine or ten.

“Epstein was a big donor, and he heard about Nadia and that

¥

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021975

"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026939.txt,"misconduct and attempted to clarify the controversial comments she made to Howard Stern about

Louis C.K. She reflected on some of her most iconic roles and looked ahead to what comes next.

Highlights from the interview are below and you can listen to the whole thing right now by subscribing
to The Last Laugh on Apple Podcasts, the Himalaya app or wherever you listen to podcasts.

On the ‘heartbreaking’ cancelation of | Love You, America

“Tt came as a surprise. We were so sure we were getting picked up. We’re all super bummed about it. I
know that they did love the show, but I think what it cost compared to its popularity or the eyes that
they had on it didn’t—you know, the people that make the decisions there don’t have any connection to
the show. And it is just so heartbreaking because I kind of feel cut off at the knees.”

<LRG_DSC02899_ fvmyha.jpeg>

Sarah Silverman on 'The Last Laugh’

Cassandra Church/Starburns Audio

On the ‘bullshit’ allegations against Al Franken

“I can only just be honest and say, if I didn’t know Al Franken, I’d probably be like yeah, go girl, me
too, fuck that shit. Because I do know him, I don’t feel that way. So maybe I’m too close to it and just
seeing the dots not the big picture. But I just can’t believe it. The U.S.O. thing is bullshit and if you
watch the sketch they did, give me a fucking break. He may be guilty of doing pedestrian comedy, I
guess, but he apologized and she accepted his apology. But it does seem that the Republican Party—
and I don’t think this is something to emulate at all—doesn’t apologize, denies everything, admits
nothing and everyone keeps their job. And I hate that that’s what we teach our children. But if you
apologize and say, ‘I want there to be an ethics investigation on me and I want to do everything by the
book, this is my truth but I’m open to [the fact] that these women felt this way, I want to make this
right,’ I don’t know why that person then loses their job.”

BURN IT DOWN

Sarah Silverman Throws Hulu Under the Bus: ‘F*ck It’

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026939
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879.txt,"From: Martin Weinberg

Sent: 4/23/2015 7:43:47 PM

To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]; Kathy Ruemmler

cc: Martin Weinberg es
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Importance: — High

Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000

Boston, MA 02116

This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,

and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is

prohibited.

On Thu, 4/23/15, Martin weinberg x wrote:

Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

To: ""Jeffrey Epstein"" <jeevacation@gmail.com>, “Kathy Ruemmler”
Cc: “Martin Weinberg"" “dkiesq""

Date: Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:31 PM

Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.

20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031727.txt,"outtakes.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031727
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024288.txt,"USE CASES FOR BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY

Financial and Records Legal / Health / Education

Bitcoin

Private Equities Bonds Public Equities Smart Contracts — Signatures/identity Degrees

Shareholder Voting Remittance Crowd-funding Wills Genome data Trusts Licensing

Spending Records —_ Micro-payments = Commodities Medical Records Escrows Delivery records

Trading Records Derivatives =_Mortgage/loan records Arbitration Grades Patents Copyrights

Digital Coupons’ Servicing records —_ Micro-charity Certifications Academic Credits

Public Records Commercial / Media

Land titles Birth certificates Vehicle registries HR Records Supply chain mgmt Accounting records

Business license Business Incorporation/dissolution Business transaction records Software licenses

Business Ownership records Regulatory records Trademarks Spam Filters Hotel room keys

Criminal records Passports Death certificates Global trade network — Loyalty Points Vouchers

Voter IDs Building permits Health/safety inspections Domain names Betting records Movie Tickets

Non-profit records Courtrecords Gun permits Voting

DRM: Music/movie/book license GPS network identity

2) BLOCKCHAIN

anal CAPITAL ONE FERRY BUILDING, SUITE 255 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 investor@blockchain.capital

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024288
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012175.txt,"KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

evidence that Mr. Epstein routinely and daily receives massages from adults. Only a
small percentage of the masseuses turned out to be minors. The majority of those minors
interviewed by law enforcement admitted to lying directly to Epstein about their ages
(not “unbeknownst to Epstein”), and inventing further false details to substantiate their
lies. Indeed, the civil attorney for several of these women admitted at his recent press
conference that they lied to Mr. Epstein about their ages. Numerous witnesses testified
that Mr. Epstein asked that all masseuses be over the age of 18. Further, the evidence is
undisputed that Mr. Epstein’s assistants scheduled the massages and Mr. Epstein did not
know which masseuses his assistants had scheduled on a particular day, until the massage
took place. We admitted that there was sexual conduct, and argued—not that it was
“innocuous” as Mr. Sloman alleges—but that it was mostly Mr. Epstein’s own self-
pleasuring, which did not satisfy the requisite federal element of criminal sexual conduct
(which is, in turn, defined by state law). These are important distinctions and show that
Mr. Sloman has misrepresented the record about the most basic part of our defense.

4. SLOMAN DEMANDS AN UNREALISTIC DEADLINE TO COMPLY WITH AN
AGREEMENT HE UNILATERALLY MODIFIES.

Mr. Sloman’s Letter:

e “Unless [Mr. Epstein] complies with all of the terms and conditions of the [Deferred
Prosecution] Agreement, as modified by the United States Attorney’s December 19,
2007 letter to Ms. Sanchez by close of business on Monday, June 2, 2008, the SDFL will
elect to terminate the Agreement.” Zd., p.1

The Truth:

e The Deferred Prosecution Agreement was never modified by U.S. Attorney Acosta’s
December 19, 2007 letter. Oddly, Mr. Sloman acknowledges this on page 4 of his May
19 letter, where he writes that Mr. Acosta “proposed” this modification and that “[Mr.
Lefkowitz] rejected these proposals.” Thus, Mr. Sloman is threatening to terminate the
Deferred Prosecution Agreement, unless Mr. Epstein complies with a unilateral
modification that Mr. Sloman concedes was never agreed to by defense counsel.

e Orchestrating the information, plea and sentencing requirements of the Deferred
Prosecution Agreement within the extremely limited two-week timeframe imposed by
Mr. Sloman’s June 2, 2008 deadline would have been difficult enough.

e More importantly, as explained below, the SDFL has refused to provide the defense with
information it requires to enable Mr. Epstein to comply with the additional plea and
sentencing requirements of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (let alone, by the June 2
deadline arbitrarily imposed by Mr. Sloman).

o The Deferred Prosecution Agreement requires Mr. Epstein to plead guilty to and
be sentenced for an additional offense which requires that he be registered as a
sex offender. In different places in his May 19, 2008 letter, Mr. Sloman

4

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012175
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022821.txt,"please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022821
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021961.txt,"TERSON

of Spanish families — including
_—had invested with Drysdale.
indreds of millions of dollars.

2 investors.
ey Epstein was help in recover-

ing stupid,” she told him.

lyn accent. They blended well
vely.

is willing to help.

e, with the money. The family
lit? A scheme. He knew some of

$ ”
_ And now the money 1s gone.

in recall that he was bad off after
tt was—from Bear Stearns. Mov-
a while. Sleeping in his lawyer's
an apartment in the Solow: Tower,

\fter all, Epstein left Bear Stearns i
t Epstein’s lifestyle was expensive. q
ien, and Ana was still in her twen- q
ctors Studio—the New York City 3
on Brando, Robert De Niro, Jack

idall been members of.
d formed a company,

sry impressive. In fac

i i iment
was running out of his apa ;

International”

t, IAG was @

Frrryy Ricu

But if Ana had known that, would she have cared? She could
already see that Epstein was brilliant. And though she would
maintain that their friendship was strictly platonic, it was Ana
who helped set Epstein on his course. Like other beautiful
women he'd cultivate throughout his life, she opened doors to
whole other kingdoms.

Ones that no boys from Brooklyn had even dreamed of.

Andrew Levander was an assistant US attorney in the Southern
District of New York’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task
Force. He was assigned to look into Drysdale’s collapse. The case
he was building would result in fraud convictions for a number
of Drysdale executives, and even today, Levander remembers
Epstein bringing “a very attractive woman” to meet him when
Epstein came to him in the course of the investigation.

The woman was Ana Obregon.

Levander told Ana that he was already working the case. A
lawyer named Robert Gold, who was a former federal prosecutor
himself, was assisting. And now Epstein would join them in the
hunt for the monies.

In effect, DGS had built a series of labyrinths, rabbit holes,

7 deadfalls. And even investors who'd lost vast sums to the com-
| Pany were less than forthcoming when it came to speaking
"" to the US attorney. Several of the investors were foreign. Some
had violated their own countries’ laws pertaining to foreign
“investments.

This was where Epstein—with his calm, confident air of

diseretion—came in.

Ana Obregon gave Epstein power of attorney over any monies

103

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021961
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031733.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031733
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010762.txt,"Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz

Case No.: CACE 15-000072

Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records
Page 6 of 20

when the medical condition becomes an integral part of the civil proceeding, particularly when
the condition is asserted as an issue by the party seeking closure” (emphasis added)).

Il. JUDGE MARRA’S ORDER IN HIS CASE DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT
THE RECORDS BE SEALED IN THIS CASE.

Dershowitz also appears to contend that Judge Marra’s order striking some of the
materials from the records at issue somehow requires that these stricken materials be kept
confidential in this case. Dershowitz’s argument misunderstands both the scope of Judge
Marra’s order and its effect in this case. His argument rests on a truncated — and misleading --
description of the events surrounding Judge Marra’s ruling striking certain documents. A more
complete description makes clear that Judge Marra has not determined the documents are
somehow “confidential” even in the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act case — much less in this
separate state defamation action.

Edwards and Cassell filed the federal case pro bono on behalf of two young women who
were sexually abused as underage girls by Dershowitz’s close personal friend — Jeffrey
Epstein. In 2008, Edwards and Casell filed a petition to enforce the rights of “Jane Doe No. 1”
and ‘Jane Doe No. 2” under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, alleging
that the Government had failed to provide them rights with regard to a plea arrangement it was
pursuing with Epstein. Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe No. 2 v. United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736
(S.D. Fla.). In the course of that case, on October 11, 2011, the victims filed discovery requests
with the Government, including requests specifically seeking information about Dershowitz,

Prince Andrew, and others. Further efforts from the Government to avoid any discovery

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010762
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019477.txt,"﻿Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1
9/29/16 5:51 PM
also by edward jay epstein
The Annals of Unsolved Crime
Three Days in May: Sex, Surveillance, and DSK
The Hollywood Economist: The Hidden Financial Reality Behind the Movies
The Big Picture: The New Logic of Money and Power in Hollywood
Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer
Deception: The Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIA
The Rise and Fall of Diamonds: The Shattering of a Brilliant Illusion
Cartel
Legend: The Secret World of Lee Harvey Oswald
Agency of Fear: Opiates and Political Power in America
Between Fact and Fiction: The Problem of Journalism
News from Nowhere: Television and the News
Counterplot
Inquest: The Warren Commission and the Establishment of Truth
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 2
9/29/16 5:51 PM
HOW AMERICA
LOST ITS SECRETS
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 2
9/29/16 5:51 PM
HOW AMERICA
LOST ITS SECRETS
Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft
Edward Jay Epstein
alfred a. knopf | new york | 2017
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 3
9/29/16 5:51 PM
this is a borzoi book
published by alfred a. knopf
Copyright © 2017 by E. J. E. Publications, Ltd.
All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Alfred A. Knopf,
a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York,
and distributed in Canada by Random House of Canada,
a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited, Toronto.
www.aaknopf.com
Knopf, Borzoi Books, and the colophon
are registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC.
Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data [to come]
Jacket photograph by TK
Jacket design by TK
Manufactured in the United States of America
First Edition
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 4
9/29/16 5:51 PM
This book is dedicated to the memory of a wise teacher,
James Q. Wilson (1931–2012)
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 5
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 6
9/29/16 5:51 PM
There are certain persons who . . . have a perfect right
to commit breaches of morality and crimes, and . . .
the law is not for them.
—fyodor dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 7
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 8
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Contents
Prologue Snowden’s Trail: Hong Kong, 2014 000
part one SNOWDEN’S ARC
chapter 1 Tinker 15
chapter 2 Secret Agent 22
chapter 3 Contractor 28
chapter 4 Thief 38
chapter 5 Crossing the Rubicon 44
chapter 6 Hacktivist 49
chapter 7 String Puller 59
chapter 8 Raider of the Inner Sanctum 73
chapter 9 Escape Artist 80
chapter 10 Whistle- blower 88
chapter 11 Enter Assange 98
chapter 12 Fugitive 104
part two THE INTELLIGENCE CRISIS
chapter 13 The Great Divide 113
chapter 14 The Crime Scene Investigation 133
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 9
9/29/16 5:51 PM
x | Contents
chapter 15 Did Snowden Act Alone? 146
chapter 16 The Question of When 156
chapter 17 The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing 168
chapter 18 The Unheeded Warning 185
part three THE GAME OF NATIONS
chapter 19 The Rise of the NSA 195
chapter 20 The NSA’s Back Door 207
chapter 21 The Russians Are Coming 217
chapter 22 The Chinese Puzzle 231
chapter 23 A Single Point of Failure 238
part four MOSCOW CALLING
chapter 24 Off to Moscow 247
chapter 25 Through the Looking Glass 254
chapter 26 The Handler 261
part five CONCLUSIONS: WALKING THE CAT BACK
chapter 27 Snowden’s Choices 271
chapter 28 The Espionage Source 281
chapter 29 The “War on Terror” After Snowden 287
Epilogue The Snowden Effect 295
Acknowledgments 301
Notes 303
Selected Bibliography 325
Index 329
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 10
9/29/16 5:51 PM
HOW AMERICA
LOST ITS SECRETS
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 1
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 2
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Prologue
Snowden’s Trail: Hong Kong, 2014
The national security agency, or, as it is now commonly
called, the NSA, was created on October 24, 1952, in such a tight
cocoon of secrecy that even the presidential order creating it was
classified top secret. When journalists asked questions about this
new agency, Washington officials jokingly told them that the initials
NSA stood for “No Such Agency.” The reason for this extraordinary
stealth is that the NSA is involved in a very sensitive enterprise.
Its job is to intercept, decode, and analyze foreign electronic communications
transmitted around the globe over copper wires, fiberoptic
cable, satellite, microwave relays, cell phone towers, wireless
transmissions, and the Internet for specified intelligence purposes. In
intelligence jargon, its product is called COMINT, which stands for
communications intelligence. Because this form of intelligence gathering
is most effective when the NSA’s targets are unaware of the
state- of- the- art tools the NSA uses to break into their computers
and telecommunications channels to first intercept and then decrypt
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 3
9/29/16 5:51 PM
4 | how america lost its secrets
their secret messages, the NSA goes to extraordinary lengths to keep
them secret. Draconian laws protect this secrecy.
In the first week of June 2013, the NSA learned that there had
been a massive breach. Thousands of secret files bearing on communications
intelligence had been stolen from a heavily guarded
regional base in Oahu, Hawaii.
The suspect was Edward Snowden, a twenty- nine- year- old civilian
analyst at that base, who had fled to Hong Kong before the
breach was discovered. According to a three- count criminal complaint
filed by federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia,
Snowden had stolen government property and violated the
Espionage Act by the unauthorized and willful communication of
national defense information to an unauthorized person. He also
likely violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by entering computer
systems illicitly.
This was not a whodunit mystery. On June 9, 2013, in an extraordinary
twelve- minute video made in a cramped hotel room in Hong
Kong, Snowden identified himself as the person who had taken the
NSA documents. Watching the video, the world saw a shy, awkward,
and sympathetic- looking man wearing a rumpled shirt, rimless
glasses, and a computer- geek haircut, passionately speaking out
against what he termed the NSA’s violations of the law and, in a
shaky voice, expressing his willingness to suffer the consequences
for exposing them.
Snowden had an innocent, idealistic, principled look about him,
and the world was ready to congratulate him for revealing the NSA’s
alleged illegal collection of data inside the United States. But in fact,
Snowden had stolen a great deal more than documents relating to
domestic surveillance. He had also stolen secret documents from the
NSA, the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the British cipher
service revealing the sources and methods they employed in their
monitoring of adversaries, which was their job.
By the time the theft had been discovered, in the first week of
June 2013, it was impossible for the FBI, a grand jury, or any other
U.S. agency to question him because he had fled the country. His
first stop, Hong Kong, the economically autonomous city of 7.2 million,
is a special administrative region of mainland China. Under the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 4
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Prologue | 5
terms of the 1997 transfer of sovereignty from Great Britain, China
is responsible for Hong Kong’s defense and foreign policy, including
intelligence services. He then proceeded to Russia, which has no
extradition treaty with the United States. Russia granted him asylum,
making it unlikely that U.S. authorities would ever have the
opportunity to question him.
Snowden’s escape left in its wake an incredibly important unsolved
mystery: How had a young analyst in training at the NSA succeeded
in penetrating all the layers of NSA security to pull off the largest
theft of secret documents in the history of American intelligence?
Did he act alone? What happened to the documents? Was his arrival
in Russia part of the plan?
Because I had written several books on the vulnerability of intelligence
services, this was a mystery— a “howdunit,” if you like— that
immediately intrigued me. Even if Snowden had acted for the most
salutary of reasons, the unauthorized transfer of state secrets from
the United States to an adversary country is, by almost any definition,
a form of espionage.
I decided to begin my investigation of this case in Hong Kong,
because it was the place to which Snowden first fled after leaving
Hawaii. Snowden had planned the trip for at least four weeks,
according to the mandatory travel plan he had filed at the NSA.
When I spoke to my sources in the intelligence community, they
could not explain Snowden’s choice. It would not necessarily protect
him from the reach of U.S. law, because Hong Kong had an active
extradition treaty with the United States. Just a few months earlier,
Hong Kong had made headlines by honoring America’s request to
extradite Trent Martin, a fugitive wanted for insider trading.
Nor was Hong Kong particularly convenient to Hawaii. There
were no nonstop flights there from Honolulu in May 2013. Snowden
flew eight hours to Narita International Airport in Japan, where he
waited almost three hours. He then flew five hours to Hong Kong.
Snowden could have flown to countries that do not have extradition
treaties with America in far less time.
Adding to this mystery, at the time he departed Honolulu,
Snowden had not yet arranged for any journalists to meet him in
Hong Kong, and as far as U.S. intelligence could determine, he had
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 5
9/29/16 5:51 PM
6 | how america lost its secrets
no known appointments there. Even so, Snowden carried to Hong
Kong digital copies he had made of the top secret NSA documents.
As General Michael Hayden, who served as the head of both the
NSA and the CIA, told me, “It’s very mysterious why Snowden
chose Hong Kong.” We can assume he had a compelling enough reason
for him to take the risk that he would be arrested there by Hong
Kong police after U.S. authorities invoked the detention provision
of its extradition treaty. It was of course possible that Snowden had
traveled there to see someone he believed could protect him.
I arrived in Hong Kong on May 20, 2014— exactly one year after
Snowden had arrived there aboard a Japan Airlines flight. I checked
in to the Mira hotel in the Tsim Sha Tsui shopping district of Kowloon,
a ten- minute ferry ride away from Hong Kong Island, where
most of the foreign consulates are located.
I chose the Mira because it was the five- star hotel in which
Snowden had stayed and where he had made the celebrated video
admitting his role in taking the NSA documents. I asked at the front
desk for room 1014, the same one that Snowden had occupied in
2013, because I wanted easy access to the hotel’s service and security
personnel responsible for the room who might have had contact
with Snowden a year earlier. Unfortunately, that room was occupied,
but I was given a nearby room that served my purpose.
Snowden had told Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, the
Guardian reporters he met in Hong Kong, that he had hidden out
at the Mira hotel since his arrival in Hong Kong because he feared
that the CIA might capture him. My first surprise was that Snowden
had not arrived at the Mira until eleven days after he arrived in
Hong Kong. As I learned from the hotel staff, Snowden had registered
there under his real name and used his own passport and credit
card to secure the room, an odd choice if he was hiding out. He had
checked in to the hotel not on May 20, as he had told the reporters,
but on June 1, 2013. He checked out on June 10.
Wherever Snowden stayed from May 20 to June 1, he apparently
considered it a safe enough place from which to send Greenwald a
“welcome package,” as he called it, of twenty top secret NSA docu-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 6
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Prologue | 7
ments on May 25. He had now not only downloaded documents but
also violated the oath he had signed when he took his job by providing
them to an unauthorized party. During this period, Snowden
also contacted Barton Gellman, on behalf of The Washington Post,
via e- mail. Indeed, while he was staying someplace other than the
place he claimed to be staying, he made almost all the arrangements
for his journalistic coming- out. He was in contact with at least one
foreign mission during this period, according to what he wrote to
Gellman on May 24. In that e- mail, concerning when and how his
story was to be published by The Washington Post, Snowden asked
Gellman to include some text that would help Snowden with his
dealings with this mission. But which country was he approaching?
In an effort to establish Snowden’s whereabouts during these “missing”
eleven days, which, among other things, could shed light on
why he first came to Hong Kong, I called Keith Bradsher, a prizewinning
journalist who had been the New York Times bureau chief in
Hong Kong in 2013. He had written a well- researched report about
Snowden’s arrival there. He proposed we meet at the Foreign Correspondents’
Club.
Bradsher told me that he had known Albert Ho, who had been
retained as Snowden’s lawyer, for more than a decade. He had interviewed
him many times, because he was a leader of a political movement
in Hong Kong. Bradsher said that a few days after Snowden
had revealed himself on June 9, he met with Ho and questioned him
about Snowden’s unknown whereabouts.
Ho told Bradsher that all of Snowden’s logistics had been arranged
for him by an intermediary, whom Ho called a “carer.” Ho said that
Snowden had been in contact with the “carer” prior to his arrival in
Hong Kong on May 20. According to Ho, it was this person who had
arranged accommodations for Snowden on his arrival and afterward.
If so, it seemed to me that this person might be able to shed light
on whom, if anyone, Snowden saw in his first eleven days in Hong
Kong. Even if this person might have been unaware of the reasons
for Snowden’s trip to Hong Kong when he made the arrangements
for him, he was still the best lead I had to learning why Snowden
had come to Hong Kong. Bradsher told me that he pressed Ho for
details about this mystery person over the course of several meet-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 7
9/29/16 5:51 PM
8 | how america lost its secrets
ings but Ho would not identify him beyond saying that he was a
“well- connected resident” of Hong Kong.
I called Ho’s law office in Hong Kong. He politely declined to be
interviewed by me, saying he had said all he was going to say about
the Snowden case. I was able, though, to make an appointment with
Robert Tibbo, a Canadian- born barrister specializing in civil liberties
cases. Tibbo had worked closely with Ho on the Snowden case.
I met Tibbo in the tearoom at the Mandarin Oriental hotel on
Hong Kong Island. Tibbo, in his early fifties, was tall, with a round
face and thinning hair. He talked freely about his remarkable career.
After earning a degree in chemical engineering from McGill University
and working in Asia as an engineer for a decade, he went to law
school in New Zealand and became a barrister in Hong Kong specializing
in cases involving the legal status of refugees.
Over a leisurely tea, Tibbo made it clear that he had played a far
more active role than Ho in the Snowden case. He had even personally
escorted Snowden from the Mira hotel to a safe house on
June 10. He did not dispute what Ho had told Bradsher. When I asked
him if he could give me the name of the “carer,” he said that he was
bound by a lawyer- client privilege that prevented him from providing
me with any details that might reveal the identity of the person
who had made arrangements for Snowden. When I asked the date
that he was officially retained by Snowden, he said that Snowden
had signed an agreement hiring him and Ho’s law firm as his legal
adviser on June 10, 2013 (which was a matter of public record).
“I understand that,” I said, “but I am inquiring about something
that had happened before you became his legal adviser.” He shook
his head, as if getting rid of a pesky fly, and said that his oath precluded
him from saying anything at all that might do damage to
the credibility of his client. “Not even where he was staying in May
in Hong Kong?” I persisted. He leaned forward and, after a brief
hesitation, said, jokingly I assumed, that he would not divulge that
information, “even if you held a gun to my head.” We met two more
times, but true to his word Tibbo would not say if he even knew the
identity of the “carer.”
Meanwhile, Joyce Xu, a very resourceful Chinese journalist who
was assisting me in Hong Kong, had filed the equivalent of a Freedom
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 8
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Prologue | 9
of Information request with the Hong Kong Security Bureau asking
for information about Snowden’s movements in May. Thomas
Ng, the secretary for security, turned down the request, adding that
Hong Kong authorities do not keep records of hotel registrations. I
had run into a dead end with the Hong Kong authorities on the issue
of Snowden’s “carer” and Snowden’s whereabouts for those eleven
crucial days.
At this point, I got some much- needed help from an old friend on
the Obama White House staff. Before I had left New York, I asked
him if he could find someone at the consulate in Hong Kong who
might brief me on the Snowden case. I didn’t hear from him until
just a few days before I was due to return to New York. He put me
in touch with a former employee of the Hong Kong consulate, who
he said was “fully informed” about the efforts of the U.S. mission to
locate Snowden in Hong Kong. This person was still living in Hong
Kong, and he agreed to meet with me on condition that I did not
mention either his name or his specific job in the U.S. mission in
Hong Kong. The venue was the terrace lounge of the American Club
in Exchange Square in central Hong Kong, a posh club mainly for
expatriate Americans. It was on the forty- eighth floor, with a spectacular
view of Victoria Harbor. Once there, I had no problem finding
my source, identifying him by the description he had given me.
He was sitting alone at a discreet table in the corner.
After we ordered drinks, he told me in a soft voice about the American
reaction to Snowden’s revelations in Hong Kong. “All hell broke
loose,” he said, describing the atmosphere at the U.S. mission after
Snowden’s video was posted on The Guardian’s website on June 9.
I asked about an assertion that Snowden had made concerning the
U.S. consulate in that extraordinary video. Snowden had said that he
could be seized at any moment by a CIA rendition team based at the
U.S. consulate “just down the road” from the Mira hotel.
“Was that true?” I asked.
He rolled his eyes and said, “Snowden has a pretty wild imagination.
For one thing, the U.S. consulate is not down the road from the
Mira in Kowloon; it is here on Hong Kong Island. And there was no
CIA rendition team in Hong Kong.”
My next question concerned a second period during which
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 9
9/29/16 5:51 PM
10 | how america lost its secrets
Snowden’s whereabouts are clouded— the period between the time
he left the Mira hotel on June 10 and the day he left Hong Kong for
Russia on June 23. When I asked my consulate source whether the
U.S. mission took any action to track Snowden during these thirteen
days, he explained that the FBI had long maintained a contingent
of “legal attachés” based at the consulate to pursue many possible
violations of U.S. law including video piracy. In addition, the CIA
and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) had retained a handful of
“China watchers” under diplomatic cover in Hong Kong. This group
constituted the “intelligence mission,” as he referred to it. It had
developed informal relations with the Hong Kong police that, along
with the NSA’s electronic capabilities abroad, allowed it to track
Snowden’s movements after he had outed himself on the video.
Because Snowden, his lawyers, and the journalists in his entourage
frequently used their cell phones to text one another, it was fairly
easy for the U.S. intelligence mission to follow Snowden’s trail after
he left the Mira hotel. He said that the Hong Kong police also knew
where he was during this period. My source further suggested that
the massive Chinese intelligence contingent in Hong Kong also
knew, because it had close relations with the Hong Kong police.
“So everyone knew Snowden’s whereabouts as he moved every
few days from apartment to apartment,” I interjected. He answered
that it was no secret to anyone except the media and the public. “Of
course we knew,” he said, adding that there were also photographs
of Snowden entering the office building that housed the Russian
consulate. I mentioned that there was a report in a Russian newspaper
that Snowden had visited the Russian consulate in late June in
connection with the flight he later took to Moscow. “All we know is
he entered the building,” he answered, with a shrug.
That Russian consulate visit did not come as a complete surprise
to U.S. intelligence. After Snowden left the Mira, his interactions
with the Russian and Chinese intelligence services in Hong Kong
had been closely monitored by “secret means,” a term that in that
context likely indicated electronic surveillance. A former top intelligence
executive in Washington, D.C., subsequently confirmed this
monitoring to me. All of Snowden’s stealth in exiting from the Mira
hotel, which included wearing a baseball cap and dark glasses, thus
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 10
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Prologue | 11
proved ineffective in hiding him from U.S. intelligence and presumably
other intelligence services seeking the treasure trove of documents
he had taken from the NSA.
As for his next destination, I could find no evidence that Snowden
had made any arrangements during his monthlong stay in Hong
Kong to go to any Latin American country. Before he went public
on June 9, he could have easily gotten a visa in Hong Kong with his
still- valid passport to go to almost any country in the world, including
Cuba (for which a U.S. passport was not necessary), Bolivia, and
Ecuador. Yet he did not apply for visas during this time period. Even
as late as June 8, after meetings with Greenwald and Poitras, his
name had still not been revealed, no criminal complaint had been
issued against him, and there was no Interpol red alert for his detention.
He could have walked out of the Mira hotel, caught a taxi to
the Hong Kong airport, and gone on Swiss International Air Lines
via Zurich to any country in South America or to Iceland. But, as
in the oft- cited Sherlock Holmes clue of the dog that did not bark,
Snowden’s inaction in not obtaining visas during this thirty- day
period suggests that he had no plans to go anyplace but where he
went: Moscow.
However, the mystery that most concerned me was not where
Snowden was housed in the interim between when he went public
and when he went to Moscow. It was where, and in whose care,
Snowden had been before he checked into the Mira on June 1. When
I asked my source about this period, he said that as far as he knew,
neither the FBI nor the Hong Kong police could find a trace of him
during the period between May 20, when he passed through Hong
Kong customs, and June 1, when he first used his credit card and
passport to check into the Mira hotel. Other than those transactions,
they could not find any credit card charges, ATM withdrawals,
telephone calls, hotel registrations, subway pass purchases, or other
clues to Snowden’s activities. As far as a paper trail was concerned,
Snowden was a ghost during this period.
“Could an American just vanish in Hong Kong for eleven days?”
I asked.
“Apparently, he did just that,” my source replied.
Snowden’s whereabouts during these eleven days was not a mys-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 11
9/29/16 5:51 PM
12 | how america lost its secrets
tery I was going to solve on this first trip to Hong Kong. I needed to
know more about his activities before he got there. After all, Snowden
was not, as he himself pointed out from Moscow, an “angel descending
from the heavens.” He had been working for the U.S. government
for the previous seven years. During that period, he had been
part of America’s secret intelligence regime and held a clearance for
sensitive compartmented information, or SCI. Such SCI material is
considered so sensitive that it must be handled within formal access
control systems established by the director of national intelligence.
Nor did Snowden’s breach begin with his handing over classified
documents to the Guardian reporters in Hong Kong in June 2013 or,
for that matter, in the eleven days prior to his meeting with journalists.
He had, as the NSA quickly determined, begun illicitly copying
documents in the summer of 2012. Such a dangerous enterprise is
not born of a sudden impulse. It was, as his actions suggested, nurtured
over many months. Even if he had managed to elude American
intelligence from late May to early June 2013, he could not hide all
the history that led to his decision to come to Hong Kong. There
had to be an envelope of circumstances surrounding it, including
Snowden’s motivation, associates, movements, finances, and activities
prior to his fleeing to Hong Kong. What was missing was not
just Snowden’s first eleven days in Hong Kong but the context of
the alleged crime.
I first needed to find out who Edward Snowden was.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 12
9/29/16 5:51 PM
part one
SNOWDEN’S ARC
I woke this morning with a new name. I had had a vision.
A dream vision. A vision righteous and true. Before me I saw
Gamers, Gamers shrouded in the glory of their true names.
Step forth, and assume your name in the pantheon. It’s
always been there, your avatar’s true name. It slips through
your subconscious, reveals itself under your posts, and
flashed visibly in that moment of unrestrained spite; in the
indulgent teabag. You’ve felt it, known it, recognized it.
Now realize it.
I woke this morning with a new name. That name is
Wolfking.
Wolfking Awesomefox.
—edward snowden, Geneva, June 12, 2008
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 13
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 14
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 1
Tinker
It’s like the boiling frog. You get exposed to a little bit of evil,
a little bit of rule- breaking, a little bit of dishonesty . . . you can
come to justify it.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
Edward joseph snowden was born on June 21, 1983, in Elizabeth
City, North Carolina. His parents were Lon Snowden and
Elizabeth “Wendy” Barrett. According to their marriage records,
they wed when they were both eighteen in 1979. The following year
they had a daughter, Jessica.
Lon Snowden, like his father before him, served in the U.S. Coast
Guard. He was stationed at its main aviation base, where his fatherin-
law, Edward Joseph Barrett, was an officer and rising star of the
Coast Guard. While Edward Snowden was still a child, his maternal
grandfather would become not only an admiral but also head of the
Coast Guard’s entire aviation service.
When Lon was transferred to a Coast Guard base near Baltimore
in 1992, he bought a two- story house in Crofton, Maryland, a residential
community very close to the NSA’s headquarters building
at Fort Meade. Edward, who was nine, and Jessica, who was twelve,
were enrolled in local public schools in Crofton.
Jessica was a top student. After she obtained her degree at the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 15
9/29/16 5:51 PM
16 | how america lost its secrets
University of Maryland, she went on to law school, graduating with
honors. Unlike his sister, Edward Snowden experienced a string of
failures in his education. In 1998, after only one year of classes, he
dropped out of Arundel High School; according to school records,
he stopped attending classes at the age of fifteen. He later attributed
his absence from school to a medical problem, mononucleosis, but
according to Robert Mosier, a spokesman for Anne Arundel County
public schools, there is no record of any illness. Brad Gunson, who
knew Snowden before he dropped out of high school, recalled in an
interview with The Washington Post only that he had a high- pitched
voice, liked magic cards, and played fantasy video games.
Instead of completing a formal education, Snowden went his own
way. Still in his teens, he became the product of a broken home. His
parents were entangled in messy divorce proceedings until he was
seventeen. By this time, Jessica had her own apartment. When his
parents separated, Snowden’s mother bought a two- bedroom condominium
in Ellicott City, Maryland. She moved Edward, along with
his two cats, into the condominium, while she remained in the family
house awaiting its sale. According to a condominium neighbor,
Joyce Kinsey, Snowden stayed home alone almost all the time. From
what she could observe, he spent long hours in front of a computer
screen.
At the age of eighteen, while other teens his age went to college,
Snowden was still living by himself, now devoting a large part of his
time to playing fantasy games on the Internet. Posting under the
alias TheTrueHooHa on a website called Ars Technica, he showed
himself to be a passionate gamer. He was especially drawn to anime,
a graphically violent style of Japanese animation. These anime
games had by 2002 achieved a fanatic following in both Japan and
the United States. He claimed special skills at Tekken, a martial arts
fighting game. He even went to anime conventions in the Washington,
D.C., area. When he became a webmaster for Ryuhana Press,
a website running these anime- based games, he described himself
somewhat fancifully as a thirty- seven- year- old father of two children.
The only truth in his description was that he was born on “the
longest day of the year” (June 21).
He wrote Internet posts under his TrueHooHa alias about how he
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 16
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Tinker | 17
used weight lifting and intensive training to precision shape his body.
He bragged to his online followers that he had reduced his “body fat
percentage to between 9.5% and 10.5%” (which was less than half
of the average for his age). He wrote that he wore “cool” purple sunglasses,
practiced martial arts, and was a fan of Japanese cuisine. He
described himself at one point, as if advertising his virtues, as having
a “head of vibrant, shimmering blond hair (with volume).”
He appeared somewhat restless with his solitary life in his almost
daily postings. He expressed a longing to go to Japan. “I’ve always
dreamed of being able to ‘make it’ in Japan. I’ve taken Japanese for
a year and a half,” he wrote in 2002. Despite his claim of learning
Japanese, there is no record of his taking any courses in Japanese.
But it was perhaps part of his yearning. In pursuit of an employment
opportunity in Japan, he posted, “I’d love a cushy gov job over
there.” Eventually, he gave up on the idea of relocating himself to
Japan because, as he explained in a post, he would have to put his cats
in quarantine for six months.
Snowden’s father meanwhile moved to Pennsylvania with his
new wife- to- be. This left Snowden with only one male family member
in the area, his maternal grandfather, Admiral Barrett, who was
now in the top echelon of U.S. intelligence working at the Pentagon.
Barrett was there when a plane piloted by terrorists crashed into it
on 9/11. He emerged unscathed.
Snowden sought to join the Special Forces through the 18X program,
a U.S. Army Reserve program created in 2003 that allowed
individuals who had not served in the military or completed their
education to train to be a Special Forces recruit. He listed his religion
on the application as Buddhist because, as he explained in a sardonic
post on Ars Technica, “agnostic is strangely absent” from the form.
He enlisted in the army reserves on May 7, 2004, according to
U.S. Army records. He reported for a ten- week basic training at Fort
Benning, Georgia, which was standard for all enlistees in the infantry.
In August, he began a three- week course in parachute jumping
but did not complete that training. As Snowden put it in his Internet
postings, he “washed out.” He was discharged on September 29,
2004, ending his nineteen- week military career. Snowden would
later claim on the Internet that he returned to civilian life because
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 17
9/29/16 5:51 PM
18 | how america lost its secrets
he had broken both legs. An army spokesman could not confirm that
Snowden injured his legs or that he was in fact dropped from the
program for medical reasons.
Under his TrueHooHa alias, Snowden wrote that “they [the army]
held on to me until the doctors cleared me to be discharged, and then
after being cleared they held onto me for another month just for
shits and giggles.” He attributed this treatment in the army, as he
would later attribute his problems in the CIA and the NSA, to the
inferior intelligence of his superiors. He wrote in his post, “Psych
problems = dishonorable discharge depending on how much they
hate you. Lots of alleged homos were in the hold unit, too, but they
only got a general discharge at best.”
If he had broken his legs, it was not evident to Joyce Kinsey, his
next- door neighbor, who told me that she never saw Snowden on
crutches when he returned to his mother’s condominium in September
2004. Army records show that he did not receive a medical
discharge. He received an “administrative discharge.” Unlike a medical
discharge, which is given because a soldier has sustained injuries
that prevent him from performing his duties, an administrative discharge
is a “morally neutral” form of separation given to a soldier
when he or she is deemed for nonmedical reasons inappropriate for
military service. Snowden preferred to cite a medical explanation for
his severance, just as he had claimed a medical reason for dropping
out of high school (and would later claim he needed medical treatment
for epilepsy at the NSA).
When he returned home from Fort Benning, Georgia, he was
twenty- one. He remained unemployed for several months before
taking a job as a security guard at the University of Maryland’s Center
for Advanced Study of Language, where he was given his first
security clearance. Snowden had to take a polygraph exam to get
the job. According to his Ars Technica postings, he worked the night
shift from six in the evening to six in the morning. He had higher
ambitions than being a campus security guard.
He wanted to become a male model. He did not seem overly concerned
about his privacy, posting pictures of himself on the Internet
“mooning” for the camera. He also posted provocative modeling pictures
of himself on the Ars Technica website. He commented on his
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 18
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Tinker | 19
own beefcake- style pictures, “So sexxxy it hurts” and “I like my girlish
figure that attracts girls.” He approached a model agency called
Model Mayhem, which recommended a photographer. He had some
concern about that photographer because he, as Snowden wrote in
a post, “shoots mostly guys.” Snowden said he was “a little worried
he might, you know, try to pull my pants off and choke me to death
with them, but he turned out to be legit and is a pretty damn good
model photographer.” He posted the photographs on the Internet.
The lack of any paid job offers dashed Snowden’s hopes for a modeling
career.
Around this time, he began dating Lindsay Mills, an extremely
attractive nineteen- year- old art student at the Maryland Institute
College of Art. Jonathan Mills, Lindsay’s father, was an applications
developer at the Oracle Corporation. According to him, Snowden
met his daughter on an Internet dating site. Snowden and Mills had
much in common. They both had divorced parents who gave them a
great deal of latitude in conducting their personal lives. Both of them
were keenly interested in perfecting their bodies through exercise
and diet regimes. Mills’s only paid employment over the next eight
years would be as a fitness and yoga instructor in Maryland. When
they first met, they both had ambitions to be models, and neither of
them had inhibitions about posing provocatively for photographers.
They both also had a desire to travel to exotic places, including cities
in Asia. Mills had spent four month in Guilin, China, before meeting
Snowden.
As bleak as his prospects as a high-school dropout might have
seemed, Snowden had an unexpected stroke of good fortune in the
spring of 2006. The CIA offered him a $66,000- a- year job as a CIA
communications officer. “I don’t have a degree of ANY type. In fact,
I don’t even have a high school diploma,” Snowden boasted in May
2006 on the website Ars Technica under his alias. He added, with
only a slight exaggeration, “I make 70K.”
How did Snowden get the job? The CIA’s minimum requirements
in 2006 for a job in its clandestine division included a bachelor’s or
master’s degree and a strong academic record, with a preferred GPA
of 3.0 or better.
The CIA needed technical workers in 2006. But even if Snowden
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 19
9/29/16 5:51 PM
20 | how america lost its secrets
applied only in this capacity, which entailed a five- year employment
agreement, the minimum requirement for an intelligence technology
job was an associate’s degree awarded by a two- year community
college in electronics and communications, engineering technology,
computer network systems, or electronics engineering technology.
Candidates had to have had a final GPA of at least 3.0 on a 4.0 scale
from a fully accredited technical school or university. Snowden, as
we’ve seen, did not meet these standards. If a candidate lacks these
qualifications, the CIA can make an exception only if he or she has
at least two years’ civilian or military work experience in the telecommunications
and/or automated information systems field that is
comparable to one of the requisite degree fields. Snowden in no way
qualified in this way either.
Under extraordinary circumstances, even the minimum requirements
might be waived if the applicant had a distinguished military
career and an honorable discharge. Snowden, however, did not
complete his military training at Fort Benning and received only an
administrative discharge.
The CIA, to be sure, had needed computer- savvy recruits to service
its expanding array of computer systems since 1990. By 2006,
however, there was no shortage of fully qualified applicants for IT
jobs who met the CIA’s minimum standards. Most of them had university
course records, work experience at IT companies, computer
science training certificates from technical schools, and other such
credentials. The CIA, like the NSA, also obtained technicians with
special skills for IT jobs from outside contractors. So it had no need
for employing a twenty- two- year- old dropout who did not meet its
requisites. According to Tyler Drumheller, a former CIA station chief
in Europe, the only plausible way that Snowden, with no qualifications,
was allowed to jump the queue was that “he had some pull.”
In 2006, Snowden’s grandfather, who had attained the rank of
rear admiral, was certainly well connected in the intelligence world.
After twenty years’ service in the Coast Guard, Barrett had joined
an interagency task force in 1998, which included top executives
from the CIA, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration.
It had been set up to monitor any gaps in the U.S. embargo on Cuba,
and Barrett, as one of its leaders, was in constant liaison with the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 20
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Tinker | 21
CIA. By 2004, he had joined the FBI as the section head of its aviation
and special operations. In this capacity, he supervised the joint
CIA- FBI interrogation of the prisoners in the Guantánamo base in
Cuba, which involved him in the rendition program for terrorists.
Barrett could certainly have played a role in furthering his only
grandson’s employment. The CIA, however, has not disclosed any
information about who, if anyone, recommended Snowden. All that
is known is that in 2006 the CIA waived its minimum requirements
for him.
Later Snowden pointed out from Moscow that in 2006 the federal
government employed his entire family. His father was serving
in the Coast Guard; his mother was an administrative clerk for the
federal court in Maryland; his sister was a research director at the
Federal Judicial Center; and Admiral Barrett was still a top executive
at the FBI. In a sense, Snowden had entered the family business.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 21
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 2
Secret Agent
Sure, a whistleblower could use these [NSA computer vulnerabilities],
but so could a spy.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
The sudden transformation of Snowden in 2006 from a
night watchman on a university campus to an employee for
the CIA provided him with a powerful new identity and one much
closer to the avatars he adopted for his fantasy games. It was burnished
so deeply in his self- image that he cited it eight years later,
in exaggerated fashion, in Moscow. When Brian Williams, then an
NBC anchorman, began an hour- long television interview with
Snowden in 2014 by saying, “It seems to me spies probably look a
lot more like Ed Snowden and a lot less like James Bond these days,”
Snowden approvingly smiled and told him, “I was trained as a spy
in sort of the traditional sense of the word.” Snowden further confirmed
his interviewer’s point, stating, “I lived and worked undercover
overseas— pretending to work in a job that I’m not [in]— and
even being assigned a name that was not mine.”
In reality, Snowden’s employment at the CIA was far more prosaic.
When he joined the CIA, he did not have the required experience
in maintaining secret communication systems, so the CIA sent
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 22
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Secret Agent | 23
him to its information technology school for six months to train as
a communications officer, not a spy. After completing his training,
he was dispatched to the CIA station in Geneva. He worked there
for the next two years as one of dozens of information technologists
servicing the CIA’s communication channels in Switzerland. He was
stationed there, according to Swiss registry records, under his own
name from March 2007 to February 2009. He was identified as a U.S.
State Department employee in Geneva because Switzerland does
not allow any intelligence officers to operate in its country. Officially,
he was attached to the permanent U.S. mission to the United
Nations, which employed hundreds of U.S. government functionaries
in Switzerland. It was a thin cover; the Swiss government was
aware that the CIA maintained its base in Geneva and posted its
employees at the U.S. mission.
Although Snowden would claim in a video he made in Hong
Kong that he had served as a “senior adviser for the Central Intelligence
Agency,” he was merely a telecommunications support officer,
or TSO in CIA parlance, which was a junior- level job at the CIA.
He worked as part of a team of information technologists under the
supervision of senior CIA officers, according to a former CIA officer
in Geneva. The job of these TSOs was to protect the security of the
CIA’s computer systems through which the CIA station in Geneva
sent and received its secret communications.
As far as is known, Snowden made very few friends at the eighthundred-
person mission. The only person to have publicly reported
knowing him in Geneva during this period is Mavanee Anderson, a
young and attractive summer intern at the U.S. mission from May
to August 2007. She described befriending Snowden, who, according
to her, said that he was in the CIA and also demonstrated to her his
martial arts skills. She later recalled in interviews that he was “a bit”
prone to brooding and voiced growing dissatisfaction with the CIA.
The job in Geneva did have its benefits, however. It provided him
with a generous housing and travel allowance. In many ways, it was
the “cushy government job” he had said he was seeking in his Internet
posts. He rented a four- room apartment and had his girlfriend,
Lindsay Mills, now twenty- one, join him there.
According to his posts on the Ars Technica website, he took full
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 23
9/29/16 5:51 PM
24 | how america lost its secrets
advantage of his compensation to live the high life. He gambled on
financial developments by buying and selling options, which are
contracts that allow speculators to bet on the directions of the market
without buying the actual stocks, bonds, or commodities. He also
bought a BMW sports car on which, he wrote, he disabled the speed
control so he could exceed the legal limit. He described in his posts
racing motorcycles in Italy and traveling around Germany with an
Estonian rock star (whom he did not further identify). He also continued
his avatar life in Internet gaming; the alias he chose for that
was Wolfking Awesomefox. He also indulged in a fantasy gun sport
called Airsoft, a variation of paintball, in which participants used
realistic- looking pistols to splatter each other with paint.
Snowden’s good fortune came to an abrupt end in 2008. He suffered
a massive loss in his options speculations. He wrote in a post
that he had “lost $20,000 in October [2008] alone,” a sum that represented
almost a third of his annual salary. He blamed the U.S. financial
system, posting on Ars Technica that Ben Bernanke, the Federal
Reserve chairman, was a “cockbag.” He also bet against any further
rise in the stock market index, asking a user with whom he was chatting
on the Internet in December 2008 to “pray” for a collapse of
stock prices. When his correspondent asked him why he wanted him
to pray for a decline, Snowden responded, “Because then I’ll be filthy
fucking rich.” But Snowden lost this bet.
Snowden lashed out at others on the Internet over these setbacks.
He termed those who questioned his financial judgment “fucking
retards.” As with other setbacks, he blamed them on government officials
in Ars Technica posts. Because the CIA was engaged in 2008 in
highly sensitive operations to gather banking data in Switzerland—
one of which Snowden later disclosed to The Guardian— any Internet
discussion by a CIA employee of financial losses could serve as a
beacon to an adversary intelligence service on the prowl for a source.
If any party was looking for disgruntled U.S. employees, Snowden’s
Internet chatter about bad choices in gambling could have aroused
its interest.
That Snowden used his TrueHooHa alias for these Internet postings
would not prevent a sophisticated espionage organization from
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 24
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Secret Agent | 25
quickly uncovering his true identity. He was listed by his true name
on the roster of the U.S. mission to the UN. By consulting personnel
records, one would further discover that he did not actually work for
the State Department. Because it was no secret that the U.S. mission
in Geneva housed the CIA station for all of Switzerland, any outsider
would think it probable that this brittle gambler who played
the options market worked for the CIA.
Even though it cannot be precluded that Snowden was spotted
in Geneva by another intelligence service, there is no evidence, at
least that I know of, to suggest that he was approached by one. Nor
is there reason to believe that if he had been contacted by a foreign
service in 2008, he would have responded positively. Despite
his indiscreet posting about his outside activities, he apparently still
respected the boundaries of secrecy that had been clearly defined in
the oath he had taken at the CIA. For example, after The New York
Times published an article revealing secret American intelligence
activities in Iran on January 11, 2009, Snowden railed against the
newspaper on the Internet under his TrueHooHa alias. He wrote,
“This shit is classified for a reason. . . . It’s because this shit won’t
work if Iran knows what we are doing.” He clearly recognized that
revealing intelligence sources was extremely damaging. As for the
Times, he said, “Hopefully they’ll finally go bankrupt this year.”
When another Internet user asked him if it was unethical to release
national security secrets, he answered, “YEEEEEEEEEES.”
As with every CIA officer, Snowden had to undergo a two- year
evaluation and take a routine polygraph test. It was then, in December
2008, that his superior at the CIA placed a “derog” in his file, the
CIA’s shorthand for a derogatory comment, in an unfavorable evaluation.
The reason remains somewhat murky. According to a New
York Times story by the veteran intelligence reporter Eric Schmitt,
Snowden’s superior had suspected that Snowden “was trying to
break into classified computer files to which he was not authorized
to have access.” Schmitt evidently had well- placed sources in the
CIA. He said that he interviewed two senior American officials who
were familiar with the case. According to what they told Schmitt, the
CIA superior had decided to “send Snowden home.” Officially, how-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 25
9/29/16 5:51 PM
26 | how america lost its secrets
ever, according to a reply by a CIA public affairs officer to the Times,
Snowden had not been fired or accused of attempting to “break into
classified computer files to which he did not have authorized access.”
A former CIA officer who had also been at the U.S. mission
in Geneva explained the discrepancy to me. He said that the spin
the CIA put on the story was “necessary containment.” After the
Snowden breach occurred in June 2013, the CIA had a problem that
could, as he put it, “blow up in its face.” If Snowden had been fired
but allowed to keep his security clearance in 2009, the CIA’s incompetence
could be partly blamed for the NSA’s subsequent employment
of him. If he had broken into a computer to which he was not
authorized, he should have been fired if not arrested.
What this spin glossed over, according to this former CIA officer,
is the part about Snowden’s behavior that concerned his superior.
Technically, Snowden, as a CIA communications officer, was authorized
to use the computer system. The problem was that Snowden
had deliberately misused it by adding code to it. This code could have
compromised the security of the CIA’s “live system.” So while what
the CIA public affairs officer quoted in the Times story said was correct,
it clouded the issue.
During his time in Geneva, Snowden had received no promotions
or commendations for his work. He was threatened with a punitive
investigation unless he agreed to quietly resign from the CIA. “It
was not a stellar career,” Drumheller, the former CIA station chief,
told me in 2014.
Snowden blamed his career- ending “derog” on an “e- mail spat”
with a superior. From Moscow, he wrote to James Risen of the Times
that his superior officer ordered him not “to rock the boat.” Further,
he complained that the technical team at the CIA station in Geneva
had “brushed him off,” even though he had a legitimate grievance.
When he complained about a flaw in the computer system, he said
that his superior took vengeance on him. He said he added the code
to the system to prove he was right. He attributed the “derog” in
his file to the incompetence, blindness, and errors of his superiors.
According to Snowden, he was a victim. This would not be the last
time he faulted superiors for their supposed incompetence. He would
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 26
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Secret Agent | 27
later say that the NSA experts who examined the documents that he
had stolen were “totally incapable.”
In any case, in February 2009, Snowden not only had a careerdamaging
“derog” in his file but faced an internal investigation of
his suspicious computer activities. According to Drumheller, such an
internal investigation would not be undertaken lightly or because of
an “e- mail spat.” He said that such an investigation was “a big deal”
involving the CIA Office of Security in Washington and possibly the
FBI. It would also result in the temporary suspension of Snowden’s
security clearance. This left Snowden with little real choice. If he
wanted to avoid that investigation, he had to resign from the CIA,
which he did in February 2009. That was the end of the security
investigation.
He was clearly bitter, posting on Ars Technica on January 10,
2009, “Obama just appointed a fucking POLITICIAN to run the
CIA!” (He was referring to Leon Panetta, President Clinton’s former
chief of staff.) Snowden attributed the origins of his antipathy to
U.S. intelligence to his 2007– 9 experiences in the CIA. He later told
Vanity Fair that the 2009 incident in the CIA convinced him that
working “through the system would lead only to reprisals.”
Snowden, if not yet a ticking time bomb, was certainly a disgruntled
intelligence worker before he ever got to the NSA.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 27
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 3
Contractor
Private contractors don’t clear employees. The government does.
— admiral michael mcconnell,
former vice- chairman, Booz Allen Hamilton
Snowden, aged twenty- five, returned from Europe and moved
into his mother’s condo. Not only was he unemployed now, having
resigned from the CIA, but his financial state had been hurt
by the huge losses he had suffered playing the options market in
Geneva and by the fact that he did not qualify for any CIA benefits.
His vision of himself as a secret agent, the unstoppable Wolfking
Awesomefox, might have also suffered. According to the narrative
he later supplied to The Guardian, he had become deeply concerned
about the immoral way in which the CIA conducted its intelligence
operations in Switzerland.
“Much of what I saw in Geneva really disillusioned me about how
my government functions and what its impact is in the world. I realized
that I was part of something that was doing far more harm than
good,” Snowden told The Guardian. By way of example, he said he
learned that the CIA had gotten a Swiss banker drunk enough to be
arrested when he drove so the CIA could compromise him. Snowden,
who did not drink himself, was appalled at this ploy. Despite his
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 28
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Contractor | 29
growing antagonism toward the U.S. government, he had not given
up on, if not becoming a secret agent, working in the netherworld of
secret intelligence.
There was still a back door through which he could reenter the
spy world. Private corporations hired civilian technicians to work
for spy agencies as independent contractors. By 2009, the CIA, the
NSA, and other U.S. intelligence services had outsourced much of
the job of maintaining and upgrading their computer systems to
these private companies. They supplied the NSA with most of its
system administrators and other information technology workers.
This arrangement allowed the NSA to effectively bypass budget
limits and other restrictions limiting how many NSA technicians
it could recruit. Instead of being on the NSA’s own payroll, these
people nominally worked for, and received their paychecks from,
private employers. In fact, many of these outside contractors worked
full- time for the NSA.
Snowden applied in April 2009 to one of these private companies,
a subsidiary of the Dell computer company. To diversify out of
manufacturing computers, Dell had recently gone into the business
of managing government computer systems for the NSA and other
intelligence services. As a leading specialist in the field of corporate
cyber security, Dell had no problem obtaining sizable contracts from
the NSA’s Technology Directorate. In 2008, the NSA had in effect
outsourced to Dell the task of reorganizing the backup systems at its
regional bases. Dell had to find thousands of independent contractors
to work at these bases. In 2009, it was seeking to fill positions
at the NSA’s regional base in Japan, and Snowden applied. Relocating
would be no issue for him because he had a longtime interest in
going to Japan.
He had little problem obtaining the job. He had a single compelling
qualification: like all other CIA officers, he had been given a
top secret clearance. For an outside contractor such as Dell, such a
security clearance was pure gold. If a potential recruit lacked it, Dell
needed to wait for a time- consuming background check that would
have to be conducted before it could deploy him or her at the NSA.
If a recruit already had the clearance, as Snowden did, he could begin
working immediately.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 29
9/29/16 5:51 PM
30 | how america lost its secrets
Snowden still had his security clearance, despite his highly problematic
exit from the CIA, because the agency had instituted a policy
a few years earlier that allowed voluntarily retiring CIA officers to
keep their clearance for two years after they left. This “free pass,” as
one former CIA officer called the two- year grace period, had been
intended to make it easier for retiring officers to find jobs in parts of
the defense industry. This accommodation, in turn, made it easier for
the CIA to downsize to meet its budget.
Not only did Snowden retain his clearance, but unlike when he
had applied for his job at the CIA in 2006, he could now list on his
résumé two years of experience in information technology and
cyber security at the CIA. Dell could check only a single fact: that
Snowden was employed at the CIA between 2006 and 2009. His CIA
file, which contained the “derog,” was not available to Dell or any
other private company because of government privacy regulations.
Even though the CIA had “security concerns” about Snowden, it
could not convey them to either Dell or the NSA without violating
the privacy rules. “So the guy with whom the CIA had concerns left
the Agency and joined the ranks of the many contractors working
in the intelligence community [IC] before CIA could inform the rest
of the IC about its worries,” Michael Morell, then CIA deputy director,
explained. “He even got a pay raise.”
Obviously, this was a glitch in the security system. As a result of
it, though, Snowden entered the secret world of the NSA only five
months after being forced out of the CIA.
For the next forty- five months, Dell assigned him various IT tasks
at the NSA. In June 2009, he was sent to Japan to work in the NSA
complex at the U.S. Yokota Air Base, which is about two hours by car
from downtown Tokyo. He moved into a small one- bedroom apartment
in Fussa, just outside the sprawling base.
His initial job for Dell was teaching cyber security to army and air
force personnel. In this capacity, he instructed U.S. military officers
stationed at the base in how to shield their computers from hackers.
Such security training had been required for military personnel
dealing with classified material after several successful break- ins
to U.S. military networks by China, Russia, and other adversary
nations. It was not a challenging or interesting job.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 30
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Contractor | 31
But Snowden found diversions in Japan. In July 2009, Lindsay
Mills joined him there. She had become an amateur photographer,
specializing in arty self- portraits. She also saw herself as a global
tourist, writing in her blog after arriving in Japan that she had traveled
to seventeen countries. Like Snowden, she also deemed herself,
tongue in cheek, a “super hero.” In this sense, her Internet avatar
was a match for Snowden’s Wolfking Awesomefox.
In Japan, Mills and Snowden spent time with another American
couple, Jennie and Joseph Chamberlin, who also worked at the
Yokota base. Jennie, a sergeant in the public affairs section of the U.S.
Air Force, had been at art college with Mills and called herself in her
blog the Little Red Ninja. Joseph Chamberlin was a decorated U.S.
Navy pilot who now flew highly sensitive intelligence- gathering
missions from the Yokota base. Jennie described Lindsay in her blog
as her “super- model friend.” The two couples also went on expeditions
in Japan together. As far as is known, the Chamberlins were
the only Americans at the base with whom Snowden socialized. On
August 17, 2009, the foursome attempted to walk up Mount Fuji,
but they got lost en route and wound up in the Mount Fuji gift
shop. Jennie described the misadventure in her blog: “Our adventure
started off a little rocky with our attempts to find the interstate.
Alas, our iconic mountain was obscured by cloud. A short stop at
the Mt. Fuji combination soba noodle stand/gift shop was enough to
whet our appetite for the further exploration that is to come.” Photographs
taken that day show Snowden wearing Hawaiian shorts
and a black tank top emblazoned with an eagle and the letters USA.
They also show Mills wearing safari shorts, a brown sweater, and
what appears to be an engagement ring. “Ed was looking rather rednecky,”
Lindsay commented on one photograph. Snowden described
her, in turn, as “nerdy.” They never made it to the top of Mount Fuji.
Snowden also sought to advance himself by getting credit toward
a college certificate by enrolling in a summer online course at the
University of Maryland’s Asia program, which had a regional campus
on the Yokota base. Known as UMUC, it had a contract with
the government to provide military personnel with such educational
opportunities. Snowden would later claim that he was taking
courses for a graduate degree in computer sciences, but William
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 31
9/29/16 5:51 PM
32 | how america lost its secrets
Stevens, the assistant registrar of UMUC, who I spoke to at the base
in 2016, told me that the program in 2009 did not provide graduate
courses in computer sciences. According to the program’s record,
while Snowden had enrolled as a student in the summer of 2009, he
received neither any credits nor a certificate.
In October 2009, Dell assigned Snowden a job in which he had
direct access to the NSA’s computers. He was now a system administrator,
which is essentially a tech- savvy repairman. Dell was working
on a backup system code- named EPICSHELTER. For this contract,
Dell was transferring large chunks of data from the NSA’s main
computers in Maryland to backup drives in Japan so that the system
could be quickly restored if there was a communications interruption.
Because most of the classified data was in its encrypted form, it
had little value to any outside party. Snowden’s job was to maintain
the proper functioning of computers, but as a system administrator
he also had privileges to call up unencrypted files. He sat in front of a
computer screen all day looking for any problems in the transferring
of files to backup servers.
The work was highly repetitive and exceedingly dull. Snowden
found time to search for anomalies in the system, and he claimed
to have spotted a major flaw in the security system in late 2009. He
discovered that a rogue system administrator in Japan could steal
secret data without anyone else’s realizing that it had been stolen.
Snowden brought that to the attention of his superiors, as he later
said.
The emergence of a rogue system administrator was not that farfetched
in 2009. Hacktivists such as Julian Assange had adopted the
battle cry “Sysadmins of the world, unite.” Instead of asking them
to “throw off their chains,” as Marx did, he asked them to send classified
documents about secret government activity to the WikiLeaks
site. Snowden, as a “sys admin,” was aware he had the power to do
so. He recalled in Moscow in 2014, “I actually recommended they
[the NSA] move to two- man control for administrative access back
in 2009.” To make his point even clearer, he added, “A whistleblower
could use these things, but so could a spy.” Not without irony,
Snowden became that rogue system administrator some three years
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 32
9/30/16 11:09 AM
Contractor | 33
later. In fact, he later used the very vulnerability he pointed out to
steal NSA documents at Dell.
In September 2009, still on the Dell payroll, Snowden made a tenday
trip to India. He later said he was on an official visit “working
at the US embassy.” Hotel records show that he arrived at the Hyatt
Regency in New Delhi on September 2 from Japan and at 3:30 p.m.
on September 3 checked into the Koenig Inn, an annex to Koenig
Solutions, a school that gave crash courses on programming and
computer hacking. According to Rohit Aggarwal, head of the school,
Snowden stayed there until September 10 while taking classes
with a private instructor. It cost $2,000 in tuition and fees, which
Snowden prepaid from Japan with his personal credit card. Even
though Snowden later said he only took courses in “programming,”
the school’s records show that during that week he took intensive
courses in sophisticated hacking techniques. The course was titled
“Ethical Hacking,” but that was a euphemism for teaching the techniques
of illicit hacking. The course provided tutoring on hackers’
tools such as SpyEye and Zeus, which are used to circumvent security
procedures. It also demonstrated how these hacking tools could
be customized by criminals and spies to break into files, plant surveillance
programs, impersonate system administrators, assume the
privileges of system administrators in a network, and capture the
passwords of others. On September 11, Snowden, according to hotel
records, left India for Japan. While the stated purpose of the hacking
training was to allow security consultants to detect intruders, it also
prepared Snowden to be, if he chose to be, an intruder in the NSA
system.
One problem with working as a contractor is that the standard
two- year contracts are not necessarily renewed. Nor is there much
possibility for advancement for IT workers. As one contractor
told me, “It is a dead- end job with great pay.” In the fall of 2010,
Snowden’s contract in Japan with Dell was nearing an end.
Dell offered Snowden, and he accepted, a new position in the
United States. He rented a modest suburban house shaded by a
sakura cherry tree in a suburb of Annapolis, Maryland. Lindsay
Mills meanwhile was attending a two- week fitness training course at
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 33
9/29/16 5:51 PM
34 | how america lost its secrets
a retreat that qualified her to be a yoga instructor. She had been living
on and off with Snowden during the previous two years abroad,
including while he worked at the CIA in Switzerland and the NSA in
Japan, and now she moved in with Snowden again. The twenty- fiveyear-
old Mills posted on Instagram, “Finally in our first US place
together.” She also put pictures online of him in bed with her, affectionately
referring to him in her posts as a “computer crusader.”
He worked on problem solving for corporate clients at Dell headquarters
in Annapolis. In preparation for his new corporate role,
Snowden shaved off his facial hair and, with Lindsay’s help, bought a
Ralph Lauren suit. His corporate clients were assisting the NSA, the
CIA, and the DIA. Consequently, Snowden dealt with a wide range of
intelligence officers and gave presentations on the vulnerabilities in
computer security at the DIA- sponsored Joint Counterintelligence
seminar. In February 2011, he attended a black tie Valentine’s Day
gala sponsored by corporate members of the Armed Forces Communication
and Electronics Association. The guest speaker was Michael
Hayden, who had headed the CIA when Snowden was abruptly
forced out two years earlier. Nevertheless, Snowden joined the cue
to have his photo taken with the former director, a perk of the charity
event.
These dealings in no way mitigated his resentment of the intelligence
establishment. What began at the CIA in 2009 as objections
to what he saw as the incompetence of his superiors grew into wellarticulated
disapproval of the way the U.S. government conducted
its intelligence. He found NSA surveillance particularly worrisome,
later telling The Guardian, “They [the NSA] are intent on making
every conversation and every form of behavior in the world known
to them.” He claimed after defecting to Moscow that he had voiced
his concerns about what he considered illicit surveillance to ten NSA
officials, “none of whom took any action to address them.” The NSA
can find no record of these complaints, but if Snowden had indeed
complained to these officials while working for Dell, his superiors
at Dell either didn’t notice or didn’t care that they had a very disgruntled
employee on their hands.
Snowden also made no secret on the Internet of his anger at the
U.S. government and the corporations that served it. He railed on
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 34
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Contractor | 35
the Ars Technica site against the complicity of private corporations,
such as Dell, that assisted the NSA. In his online posts in 2010,
Snowden expressed loathing for the assistance that corporate America
was providing the intelligence community. “It really concerns
me how little this sort of corporate behavior bothers those outside of
technology circles,” he wrote under his TrueHooHa alias. He said he
feared that America was already on “a slippery slope,” and he suggested,
perhaps adumbrating his own later actions, that this corporate
assistance to U.S. intelligence “was entirely within our control
to stop.”
What the “computer crusader” expressed in these angry Internet
postings was an almost obsessive concern over individuals’ freely
submitting to government authority. “Society really seems to have
developed an unquestioning obedience towards spooky types,” he
wrote on Ars Technica without mentioning that he himself worked
for a corporation that assisted spy agencies. He asked rhetorically
on this public forum whether the sinister slide toward a surveillance
state “sneaked in undetected because of pervasive government
secrecy.”
The outright contempt he expressed toward this “government
secrecy” did not prevent him from seeking even more secret work
at Dell for the intelligence services. In February 2011, after his CIA
security clearance ran out, he applied to renew it. The new clearance
now required a new background check and filling out the government’s
127- page Standard Form 86.
Since 1996, background investigations for the NSA, like much of
the computer work at the NSA, had been outsourced to a private
company. It had proceeded from the effort of the Clinton administration
to cut the size of government by privatizing tasks that could
be more efficiently done by for- profit companies. U.S. Investigations
Services, or USIS, as it is now called, which won the contract
for background checks, was initially owned by the private equity
fund Carlyle Group, which later sold it to another financial group,
Providence Equity Partners. For the private equity and hedge funds,
profits were the measure of success. To increase its profits from the
contract with the NSA, USIS had to move more quickly in concluding
background checks because it did not get paid more for extensive
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 35
9/29/16 5:51 PM
36 | how america lost its secrets
investigation. In 2006, the government learned these background
checks were often prematurely ended. In Snowden’s case, because
the CIA did not share its files with a private concern, USIS did not
have access to Snowden’s CIA files, and it therefore did not learn
about the threatened security investigation. Nor did it learn from
the Internet, where he always employed an alias, that he was a disgruntled
employee. So Snowden’s new clearance was approved in
the summer of 2011, allowing him to continue working for Dell on
secret intelligence projects.
Meanwhile, in August 2011, Mills began her own blog titled
L’s Journey. In it, she described herself as “a world- traveling poledancing
super hero.” Many of her posted pictures were provocative
poses of herself in her underwear and various states of undress. She
wrote, “I’ve always wanted to be splashed on the cover of magazines,
with my best air- brushed look.” Her wish would be gratified two
years later in a way she likely did not anticipate.
For his part, Snowden seemed happy to encourage her fantasy
about being a superhero. He even gave her a Star Trek– inspired head
visor. Despite all the concerns he voiced about privacy, he did not
seem to mind her provocative posts. On the contrary, he took photographs
of her, telling her at one point that her photographs were
not “sexy” enough.
Snowden was soon offered a new position by Dell at the NSA’s
Kunia regional base in Hawaii. Dell, which was in the process of
expanding its government consulting business, wanted him to be a
system administrator on the NSA’s backup system. The NSA needed
this system before it could upgrade new security protocols that
would audit suspicious activity in real time. In Hawaii, as in Japan,
system administrators still worked alone. Snowden knew from his
experience in Japan that this solo work in an unaudited workplace
provided an opportunity for a system administrator to steal documents.
So he might also have realized that as a solo system administrator
in Hawaii, he would have this opportunity. Whether this
was on his mind or not, on March 15, 2012, he accepted this offer.
Dell agreed to pay all his relocation expenses and provide him with
a housing allowance.
He found a 1,559- square- foot house in Oahu, located at 94- 1044
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 36
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Contractor | 37
Eleu Street in the middle- class suburb of Waipahu. It was part of
the Royal Kunia development, which contained three hundred
similar- looking homes. According to Albi Matco, the manager of the
community association for the development, many of the residents
worked at military facilities in the area. The corner house Snowden
rented was comfortable enough, with three bedrooms, a walk- in
closet, a living room with a high ceiling, and a single- car garage, but
in no way lavish. It did not even have a backyard. He moved in on
April 2, 2012, which entailed a brief separation from his girlfriend,
Mills, who had committed herself to attending a girlfriend’s wedding
the following month. After he left for his new assignment, she wrote
on Instagram, “Sex toy party and then saying goodbye to my man—
well not goodbye so much as see you in two months.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 37
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 4
Thief
We begin by coveting what we see every day.
— hannibal lecter, The Silence of the Lambs
In hawaii in 2012, Snowden was living a very comfortable life.
He was earning just over $120,000 a year from Dell. His housing
allowance covered the rent and the lease on his car. He worked
five days a week at the NSA base. The commute, as I timed it, took
only ten minutes. Driving past a sign marked “Restricted Area: Keep
Out,” and the security booth where NSA guards checked his credentials,
he left his car in the outdoor lot for the Kunia Regional
Security Operations Center. (When I drove into the base in 2016,
I was detained nearly two hours at the security booth before being
turned back.)
Snowden worked in a three-story reinforced concrete building
called “the tunnel,” even though it was above the ground. It had
been built during World War II to serve as an aircraft assembly
plant. During the war, it was entirely covered with earth and shrubbery
to proof it against Japanese bomber attacks. In 1980, the NSA
converted it to its regional base in Hawaii for its intelligence gather-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 38
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Thief | 39
ing. Its lack of windows and the dirt covering gave it the appearance,
when I viewed it in 2016, of an oblong-shaped anthill. Workers, both
military and civilian, entered through an exterior staircase in the
center of the mound. Even though it is above the ground, it is known
as the tunnel. Snowden said in describing the atmosphere, “You’re in
a vaulted space. Everybody has sort of similar clearances, everybody
knows everybody. It’s a small world.” He said that to relieve the
tediousness of the work, every two months or so his fellow workers
would circulate a picture of a naked person that showed up on
their screens as part of the NSA’s surveillance of foreign suspects. He
explained, “You’ve got young enlisted guys, 18 to 22 years old [who
have] suddenly been thrust into a position of extraordinary responsibility
where they now have access to all of your private records. In
the course of their daily work they stumble across . . . an intimate
nude photo of someone in a sexually compromising position.”
He knew that copying any files, including photographs, was a violation
of NSA rules. But he did not report this illicit activity to the
NSA, even though he later claimed that it occurred regularly. He
joked in his Moscow interview with The Guardian that some of the
nudes were “extremely attractive” and that viewing them was, as he
put it, “the fringe benefits of surveillance positions.”
Snowden identified with the Libertarian Party, and at the NSA
he made no effort to conceal his political support of its causes. He
became an active partisan of Congressman Ron Paul, the leading figure
in the party in 2012. “He’s so dreamy,” Snowden posted on the
Ars Technica site in March 2009 (just after he registered to vote in
North Carolina, though he no longer lived there). Paul was running
in the 2012 Republican presidential primaries, and Snowden made
a contribution of $500 to his election committee. Snowden’s attraction
to Paul’s libertarian ideology was not that surprising. At the
core of Paul’s worldview was a deep hostility to the intrusion of the
government into private lives. Snowden shared this hostility, as was
clear from his Internet postings. Like other Libertarians, Snowden
believed that citizens should not be “shackled” by federal law. He
later addressed from Moscow via an Internet hookup a libertarian
gathering at which Ron Paul also spoke. “Law is a lot like medi-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 39
9/29/16 5:51 PM
40 | how america lost its secrets
cine,” he said. “When you have too much it can be fatal.” Like Paul,
Snowden ardently opposed any form of gun control, as did Lindsay
Mills in her online postings.
Like other Libertarians, Snowden, a contractor for the government,
saw the government as an adversary. “The [American] government,”
he later said, “assumed upon itself, in secret, new executive powers
without any public awareness or any public consent and used them
against the citizenry of its own country to increase its own power,
to increase its own awareness.” Most relevant to his future activities
at the NSA, Snowden wholeheartedly agreed with Paul’s position
on the dangers inherent in government surveillance of U.S. citizens.
Paul described the CIA, the organization that had forced Snowden
out, as nothing short of a “secret government” and said that “in a
true Republic, there is no place for an organization like the CIA.” He
also railed against NSA surveillance.
As is clear from Snowden’s Internet postings, he, like Ron Paul,
had doubts about the competence of the intelligence agencies of the
U.S. government. Snowden’s own disillusionment about the government
might have begun with his rejection and perceived mistreatment
by the Special Forces of the U.S. Army. It was almost certainly
reinforced by his ouster from the CIA. He later told The Guardian
that he was disillusioned as early as 2007 when he learned about the
CIA’s methods in compromising Swiss citizens. His critical view of
the U.S. government only hardened during the years he worked at
the NSA. He described his NSA superiors as “grossly incompetent,”
as he later explained to a journalist from Wired magazine in Moscow.
At the NSA, he said employees were kept in line by “fear and
a false image of patriotism.” He said that he saw his fellow workers
cowed into “obedience to authority” and his superiors induced to
break the law. He became particularly concerned with what he called
the “secret powers” of the NSA. He saw them as “tremendously
dangerous.” By this time, Snowden was fully aware that the NSA
conducted domestic surveillance because he had used his privileges
as a system administrator in 2012 to read the NSA inspector general’s
report on a 2009 surveillance program.
Nevertheless, Snowden continued to work at the NSA, where he
was, as he put it, “making a ton of money.” Mills joined him in his
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 40
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Thief | 41
“paradise” in June 2012, shortly before his twenty- ninth birthday.
Just before leaving Annapolis for Hawaii, Mills posted a seminude
picture of herself on her blog, L’s Journey. In it, her face was covered
with a blanket. The caption under it read, “Trying to avoid the
changes coming my way.” In Honolulu, she found “E.,” as she called
Snowden in her blog, “elusive.” She found that he preferred to stay
at home and avoided meeting other people to the point that her
friends “were not quite sure that E. existed.” Lindsay’s fellow performers
in the Waikiki Acrobatic Troupe told me in 2016 that they
rarely, if ever, saw Snowden at the practice sessions. Andrew Towl,
a juggler with the group, did briefly meet Snowden once. It was on
a hike with Lindsay in Oahu. Towl said he asked Snowden what he
was doing in Hawaii and Snowden answered tersely, “I work with
computers,” and continued walking. Even though Mills had dated
Snowden for eight years, most of her other friends, except for Jennie
and Joe Chamberlin in Japan, had not met him. Next door neighbors
I spoke to caught brief glimpses of him entering or leaving his
house but did not engage him in a conversation as Snowden tended
to avoid eye contact. If he had other social interactions in Hawaii, no
one he met came forward and spoke of meeting him, even after he
became world famous.
Two days after his twenty- ninth birthday dinner on June 21, Mills
described him playfully as a “goof.” She wrote in her blog, “The
universe is telling me something and I’m pretty sure it’s saying get
out, Fuck you Hawaii.” In early July, she summed up her shaky situation
with Snowden in another blog, writing, “I moved to Hawaii
to continue my relationship with E. [but] it has been an emotional
roller coaster since I stepped off the plane.” She diverted herself by
organizing a pole- dancing studio in the four- hundred- square- foot
garage of the house. She also found her own friends in physical fitness
and dance groups. She joined a New Age yoga studio called
Physical Phatness, as well as a local acrobatic performance group,
and, on Friday nights, pole danced at the Mercury lounge in downtown
Honolulu. Unlike Snowden, she enjoyed socializing, writing in
her blog, “We lovingly crammed a large group into a small corner
of a delicious Japanese restaurant and filled our bellies with sushi,
tempura, and good conversation.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 41
9/29/16 5:51 PM
42 | how america lost its secrets
That same July, Snowden had other things on his mind, including
an attempt to advance himself. Although his position at Dell as
a system administrator was a well- compensated one, especially for
a twenty- nine- year- old with no formal education, it carried little
prestige. He sat from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. in a windowless room
watching a bank of monitors in the so- called tunnel. Many of those
who worked with him were, as he described them, “eighteen year old
soldiers.” Presumably, they had little interest in discussing with him
the weightier issues of the world. Working as an outside contractor
was also a dead- end job that hardly matched the vision he had of
himself in his Internet postings. In real life, in a cubicle in the NSA,
he was decidedly not the Wolfking Awesomefox heroic image he had
of himself in his dream vision.
Snowden now decided to apply for a position in the NSA itself.
He apparently believed that if he scored high enough on its entrance
exam, the NSA would invite him to join it as a Senior Executive
Service officer, or SES, which was the civilian equivalent in rank and
pay to a flag officer in the U.S. armed forces. “I’m still amazed that
a twenty-eight-year-old thought he could get an SES position,” a
civilian contractor working for the NSA during the same period told
me, “Snowden had a very overinflated view of his self-worth.” To
enhance his chances of getting the SES job, Snowden in the summer
of 2012 illicitly hacked into the NSA’s administrative files and stole
the answers to the NSA exam. As the NSA’s subsequent postmortem
would determine, it was the first known document that Snowden
took without authorization at the NSA.
It was not the first time, however, that he had used his hacking
skills to attempt to advance himself. At the CIA in 2009, as he later
said in Moscow, he had added text to his annual CIA evaluation in
what he termed “a non- malicious way” to prove a point. His CIA
superior took a much darker view of that incident when the hack
was detected, calling for an investigation. It was the threat of that
investigation that, it will be recalled, in effect ended Snowden’s CIA
career. At the NSA, his intrusion was not detected for almost a year.
“He stole the [NSA] test with the answers, and he took the test and
he aced it,” the former NSA director Michael McConnell recounted
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 42
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Thief | 43
in a 2013 interview. “He then walked into the NSA and said you
should hire me because I am this good on the test.”
The reason why he attempted to gain entry into the upper ranks
of the NSA in the late summer of 2012 is less clear. If his Internet
posting and libertarian riffs are an indication of his state of mind
then, he was hostile to the surveillance activities of the NSA. If so, it
made little sense that he would seek a permanent career there. If this
is considered in light of the career move he made six months later
(in March 2013), which, as he himself admits, was for the express
purpose of getting at tightly held documents stored on computers
that were not available to him in his job at Dell, then he might have
been seeking wider access in 2012 for a more nefarious purpose than
an NSA job.
In any case, despite the near- perfect scores, the NSA did not offer
him a Senior Executive Service job. “It was totally unrealistic for
Snowden to expect to get an SES position,” a former senior NSA
officer told me. Snowden’s ambitions might have been disappointed
in this instance, but it did not prevent him from later claiming that
he had been a senior adviser to the CIA and also a senior adviser to
the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Instead of an SES position, the NSA offered him a lowly G- 13 job
as an information technology worker, which was not an improvement
on his job at Dell. He took this slight as evidence of the NSA’s
incompetence, subsequently joking to a reporter in Moscow that his
ability to steal the test answers should have been seen as a qualification
for the NSA job. In September 2012, he turned down the NSA
offer. If he was to advance himself now, he had to find a new way.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 43
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 5
Crossing the Rubicon
What I came to feel is that a regime that is described as a national
security agency has stopped representing the public interest and
has instead begun to protect and promote state security interests.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
Soon after Snowden failed to get an SES job at the NSA in September
2012, he intensified his rogue activities. As we’ve seen,
part of Snowden’s job as a system administrator under contract to
Dell was transferring files held at Fort Meade to backup computers
in Hawaii. He “was moving copies of that data there for them,” said
Deputy Director Ledgett, “which was perfect cover for stealing the
[NSA] data” through the fall and winter of 2012. The security measures
at the Hawaii base presented no obstacles to him because, as
a system administrator, he had privileges that allowed him to copy
documents that had not been encrypted. Indeed, it was part of the
process of building the backup system. The flaw he had pointed to
in Japan, in which system administrators working solo could safely
steal files, also existed in Hawaii, as we know. This time, however,
instead of bringing it to the attention of the NSA, he used it to steal
files.
Snowden could be confident that his thefts of documents would
go undetected. Real- time auditing of the movement of documents,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 44
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Crossing the Rubicon | 45
which was done at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade and most of the
NSA’s regional facilities, had not yet been installed at the Hawaii
base, because a lack of bandwidth prevented the safe upgrading of
the software. This auditing software was scheduled to be installed
after the backup system was completed in 2013. The Kunia base was
one of the last NSA bases that did not monitor suspicious transfers
of files on a real- time basis. Snowden was aware of this deficiency;
he later pointed out in his interview in Wired that the NSA base
where he worked did not have an “audit” mechanism. This security
gap allowed Snowden, using his system administrator’s credentials,
to copy classified data to a thumb drive without anyone’s being able
to trace the copied data back to him. According to the NSA’s subsequent
damage assessment, he stole many thousands of pages while
working for Dell in 2012 before he contacted journalists. Ledgett
subsequently reported that the NSA analysis of the fifty- eight thousand
documents that were given by Snowden to journalists in June
2013 showed that most of them were taken while he was still working
at Dell.
This theft was made even more serious by the interconnection
of NSA computers with those of other intelligence agencies. Prior
to the 9/11 attacks in 2001, “stovepiping” had protected NSA data
on its computers from networks used by other intelligence services.
After the 9/11 Commission concluded that part of the reason U.S.
intelligence agencies were unable to “connect the dots” in advance of
the attack was related to this practice, the NSA stripped away a large
part of its stovepiping. As a result, the NSANet, which Snowden
had access to at Dell in 2012, became a shared network with “common
access points,” as the former NSA director Michael Hayden
described them to me, which made them the equivalent of “reading
rooms” in a library. They served as a means for NSA workers to
exchange ideas about the problems they were encountering on various
projects for the intelligence community. In maintaining them,
system administrators, or “system admins,” like Snowden, acted as
the “librarians.” If a system administrator copied data from this network,
no one knew.
For Snowden, the NSANet, which included CIA and Defense
Department documents, provided a rich hunting ground in the fall
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 45
9/29/16 5:51 PM
46 | how america lost its secrets
and winter of 2012. Many of the documents he took off the NSANet
revealed operations not only of the NSA but also of the CIA and the
Pentagon. By taking them, he had come to a Rubicon from which
there would be no return. He later explained in an e- mail to Vanity
Fair from Moscow, “I crossed that line.”
As far as is known, Snowden was not sharing documents with any
other party prior to May 2013. He was not even yet in contact with
Poitras, Greenwald, or any other journalists. Presumably, Snowden
was collecting them on drives— despite the risks that possessing
such a collection of secrets might entail— for some future use.
Why would Snowden jeopardize his career and, if caught, his freedom
by undertaking this illicit enterprise? He might by now have
had strong ideological objections to the NSA’s global surveillance. As
he said later in Moscow, “We’re subverting our security standards
for the sake of surveillance.” Ordinarily, though, even ideologically
opposed employees don’t steal state secrets and risk imprisonment.
If they are disgruntled, they seek employment elsewhere. Certainly,
Snowden, with his three years’ experience working for Dell, would
have little problem finding a job as an IT worker in the booming
civilian sector of computer technology. Instead, he sought to widen
his access to NSA documents. This behavior suggests that he might
have had another agenda. One possible clue to it is the first document
he took: the NSA exam. The answers to the questions in it
represented to him a form of tactical power. Those answers could
empower him to obtain a more important job in the NSA itself that
would allow him to burrow deeper into the executive structure of
the agency. Holding such a job would unlock the door to documents
containing the NSA’s sources stored in areas not available to Dell
contractors like himself.
His later actions demonstrated that he equated the possession of
such secrets with personal power. For example, after he arrived in
Moscow in 2013, he bragged to James Risen of the Times that he
had access to secrets that gave him great leverage over the NSA. He
told him specifically his access to “full lists” of the NSA’s agents and
operations in adversary countries could, if revealed, close down the
NSA’s capabilities to gather information in them.
Such a fascination with the power of government- held secrets
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 46
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Crossing the Rubicon | 47
has always been a core concern of radical Libertarians. In his 1956
book, The Torment of Secrecy: The Background and Consequences of
American Security Policies, the sociologist Edward Shils brilliantly
dissects the fascination with secrecy among individuals who fear that
government agencies will use covert machinations against them. In
Shils’s concept, this counterculture is “tormented” by the government’s
possession of knowledge unavailable to them. Members of
this culture tend to believe that the agencies that hold these secrets,
such as the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, can control their lives; they
also believe that obtaining such secrets will give individuals power
over government.
Snowden himself was concerned with a coming “dark future,”
which he later described as follows: “[The elites] know everything
about us and we know nothing about them— because they are secret,
they are privileged, and they are a separate class . . . the elite class,
the political class, the resource class— we don’t know where they
live, we don’t know what they do, we don’t know who their friends
are. They have the ability to know all that about us. This is the direction
of the future but I think there are changing possibilities in this.”
To change the “dark future,” someone would have to know the
secrets of the “elites.” Snowden saw himself as one of the few individuals
in a position to seize state secrets from those elites. He had
a SCI (sensitive compartmented information) clearance, a pass into
an NSA regional base, and the privileges of a system administrator.
This position allowed him to steal state secrets and whatever power
that went with them. And if he moved to a position that gave him
greater access, he would, in this view, amass even greater power.
Whatever his actual agenda in 2012, we know that he tested possible
reactions to a leak exposing NSA surveillance in the United
States. He asked fellow workers at the NSA base in 2012, according
to his own account, “What do you think the public would do if this
[secret data] was on the front page?” He asked this question at a time
when a large number of State Department and U.S. Army classified
documents had been posted on Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks website.
These WikiLeaks revelations made, as Snowden knew they would,
front- page headlines. His “question” was only rhetorical. No covert
NSA document had ever been published in the press as of 2012. One
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 47
9/29/16 5:51 PM
48 | how america lost its secrets
reason why NSA documents remained secrets, as all intelligence
workers at Dell were told when they signed their oath to protect
NSA secrets, was that the unauthorized release of communications
intelligence documents would violate U.S. espionage laws. Even so,
there was no shortage of activists overseas, such as Assange, who
would be willing to publish NSA documents revealing its global surveillance
activities. Cyberpunks, as these activists called themselves,
tended to be hostile to the NSA because they believed (correctly)
that it monitored their activities on the Internet. This anti- NSA
view was well represented at the Chaos Computer Club convention
in Berlin in 2012. In addressing these cyberpunks, Assange and his
followers at WikiLeaks declared that the main enemy in cyberspace
was the NSA. The NSA documents Snowden had taken were far
more explosive than anything Assange had posted to date because
they contained NSA intelligence source material.
In the late fall of 2012, Snowden further tested his newly found
powers. Using an alias, he reached out to some of the leading hacktivists.
It opened a door for him to the darker side of cyberspace.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 48
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 6
Hacktivist
When you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes into you.
— friedrich nietzsche
By the time that Snowden had begun hacking into NSA files
in 2012, the alienated hacktivist battling to unlock the secrets
of evil corporations and governments had become a stock hero of
popular culture. For example, in the international best- selling Girl
with the Dragon Tattoo Trilogy by Stieg Larsson, the heroine, a
self- educated hacker in her twenties named Lisbeth Salander, steals
incriminating documents from computers that provide the journalist
Mikael Blomkvist with scoops that save from bankruptcy the progressive
magazine he edits. The journalists at the magazine accept
her sociopathic behavior, which includes embezzling millions of dollars,
extortion, maiming, and murder, because her hacking exposes
crimes and abuses of power. In the real- world universe, hacktivists
also use their skills to attempt to redress perceived abuses of power.
For example, in December 2010, the group Anonymous, whose
members, called Anons, often wear Guy Fawkes masks resembling
those worn in the 2006 movie V for Vendetta, launched a successful
denial- of- service attack called Operation Avenge Assange. It was
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 49
9/29/16 5:51 PM
50 | how america lost its secrets
aimed at paralyzing companies, including PayPal and MasterCard,
that refused to process donations for WikiLeaks, which these Anons
believed were stifling the freedom of the Internet. Because hacktivists
often use illicit means to redress their grievances, such as denialof-
service attacks, theft of passwords, and hacking into computers,
they must conceal their true identities to avoid the retribution of
the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. This requires them to
operate on the dark side of cyberspace, which has become known as
the dark net. Fortunately for hacktivists, the dark net is accessible to
anyone.
It is a place frequented by those who want to avoid laws, regulations,
and government surveillance. Its denizens include cyber saboteurs,
industrial spies, purveyors of illegal contraband, spammers,
pranksters, identity thieves, video pirates, bullies, slanderers, drug
dealers, child pornographers, money launderers, contract killers,
inside traders, anarchists, terrorists, and the intelligence services of
many countries.
Sue Halpern, writing about it in The New York Review of Books,
noted, “My own forays to the dark Net include visits to sites offering
counterfeit drivers’ licenses, methamphetamine, a template for
a US twenty- dollar bill, files to make a 3D- printed gun, and books
describing how to receive illegal goods in the mail without getting
caught. There were, too, links to rape and child abuse videos.”
To operate effectively on the dark net, one often needs a mask
of anonymity. But it is not easy to completely hide one’s tracks
in cyberspace. The way that the Internet ordinarily works is that
whenever an individual sends e- mails or instant messages or visits
a website, his or her identity can be referenced by the IP address
assigned to him or her by the Internet service provider. If dark net
users’ IP addresses are discoverable, they obviously cannot remain
anonymous. So, to evade this built- in Internet transparency, dark
side users have come to rely on ingenious software to hide their
IP addresses. The most commonly used software for this purpose
is Tor, which was first called the Onion Router, because it moves IP
addresses through multiple layers. Tor software hides the IP address
by routing messages through a network of Tor- enabled relay stations,
called nodes. Each node further obscures the user’s IP, even
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 50
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Hacktivist | 51
from the next node in the network. This scrambling allows messages
to exit the chain of Tor nodes without an easily discoverable IP. By
doing so, it “anomizes” each user of the dark side.
Because of the anonymity it provides, Tor became the software of
choice for individuals and organizations who wanted to hide their
identities. For example, Tor software made possible Silk Road, which
acted as an exchange for drug dealers, assassins, safecrackers, and
prostitutes until it was closed down by the FBI in 2013. It was created
by Ross Ulbricht, a Libertarian who wore a Ron Paul T- shirt,
as a website where “people could buy anything anonymously, with
no trail whatsoever that led back to them.” (Ulbricht received a life
sentence for running this criminal enterprise in May 2015.)
Tor software was also employed by Private Bradley Manning
(now Chelsea Manning) to transfer some fifty thousand diplomatic
cables and military reports from his laptop to Assange’s WikiLeaks
website. Eventually, Manning was identified by a fellow hacker, convicted
by a military court for violations of the Espionage Act, and
sentenced to thirty- five years in prison. Tor enabled WikiLeaks to
publish other secret data, such as material acquired in the theft of
Sony’s files, allegedly by the North Korean intelligence service, in
2015. It was the means for guaranteeing anonymity to the IT workers
who responded to Assange’s by now famous clarion call to unite.
It allowed system administrators who opposed the “surveillance
state,” as well as other disgruntled employees of government agencies
or corporations, to send documents they copied to the WikiLeaks
website without revealing their IP addresses.
Because WikiLeaks did not know the identity of its sources, it
could not be legally compelled to reveal them. “Tor’s importance
to WikiLeaks cannot be overstated,” Assange said in an interview
with Rolling Stone in 2012. Indeed, without the anonymity provided
by its Tor software, WikiLeaks could not have easily entered into a
document- sharing arrangement with major newspapers, including
The Guardian, The New York Times, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, and El
País. Through the magic of Tor, these newspapers simply attribute
their sources to WikiLeaks, which, in turn, made Assange a major
force in international journalism.
Ironically, Tor was a creation of U.S. intelligence. In the early years
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 51
9/29/16 5:51 PM
52 | how america lost its secrets
of the twenty- first century, the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory and
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency developed it to
allow American intelligence operatives to cloak their movements on
the Internet. They could anonymously manipulate websites operated
by Islamic radicals, for example, and create their own Trojan
horse sites to lure would- be terrorists and spies. As it turned out,
that use of Tor software had a conceptual flaw. If U.S. intelligence
services used it, the targets could figure out that anyone visiting a
site without an IP address was using Tor software to hide it. If Tor
was exclusively used by U.S. intelligence services, the targets could
further deduce that all the anonymous visitors were avatars for
American intelligence. It would be analogous to undercover police
using pink- colored cars that civilians did not use.
To remedy this flaw, the U.S. government made Tor software open
source in 2008 and freely available to everyone in the world. It even
provided funding for its promulgation, with the State Department,
the National Science Foundation, and the Broadcasting Board of
Governors financing Tor’s core developer. The public rationale for
this generosity was that Tor could serve as a tool for, as the State
Department called it, “democracy advocates in authoritarian states.”
While Tor software remained a useful tool in covert operations by
the CIA, the DIA, and the FBI, it was anathema to the NSA because
it made it more difficult for it to track potential targets.
As Tor software became widely used by adversaries (as well as
common criminals), the NSA sought to find vulnerabilities in it. “It
should hardly be surprising that our intelligence agencies seek ways
to counteract targets that use Tor software to hide their communications,”
explained an NSA spokesperson. The NSA’s adversaries also
took an interest in identifying Tor users because they might include
political dissidents and potential spies.
Tor software also took on a cultlike importance to hacktivists concerned
with the U.S. government’s tracking their activities. Catherine
A. Fitzpatrick provides an illuminating insight into the mind- set of
these hacktivists in her 2014 book, Privacy for Me and Not for Thee.
She describes them as largely “radical anarchists” who believe “the
state is all- powerful, that law- enforcement is so strong that it will
prevail anyway, and that they are a persecuted minority.” As a refuge
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 52
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Hacktivist | 53
against the surveillance of the state, and in particular the NSA, they
not only attempt to hide their own identities but also use encryption
to obscure their messages. Their goal is to free their movements “of
any interference from law- enforcement.” In this mind- set, according
to Fitzpatrick, “they believe government intelligence agencies
will stop at nothing to stop them from absolute encryption.”
Tor software was a means to defeat the NSA, but for it to be successful,
there needed to be such a proliferation of Tor servers that
the NSA could not piece together IP addresses. The problem was that
the Tor Project, as they called it, was still a very tiny operation in
2012. It employed fewer than a hundred core developers, who were
located mainly in Germany, Iceland, Japan, Estonia, and the United
States. Its staff worked mainly out of a single room in Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
The guiding spirit behind the Tor movement in the private sector
was Jacob Appelbaum, a charismatic twenty- eight- year- old who had
grown up in Northern California. Like Snowden, he had dropped
out of high school. Appelbaum identified himself to his followers on
the Internet as a “hacktivist” battling state surveillance. For him, as
for many in the hacktivist culture, the main enemy was the NSA.
After all, the NSA had a vast army of computer scientists working
to defeat Tor software. Appelbaum was well connected in this culture,
having been the North American representative for WikiLeaks
before he moved to Berlin in 2013. He also managed WikiLeaks’s
cyber security when it released the classified documents it obtained
from Manning in 2010. He was so well regarded among hacktivists
that Assange chose him as his keynote speaker replacement at
the Hackers on Planet Earth (HOPE) convention in New York City.
Assange told Rolling Stone, “Jake [Appelbaum] has been a tireless
promoter behind the scenes of our cause.” For its part, Rolling Stone
titled its profile of Appelbaum “Meet the Most Dangerous Man in
Cyberspace.” (Assange needed a replacement for this particular event
because he feared if he came to New York, he would be arrested for
releasing the Manning files on WikiLeaks.)
In Berlin, Appelbaum went to extreme lengths to protect himself
from American surveillance. For example, when George Packer
interviewed him for The New Yorker in 2014, he insisted on meet-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 53
9/29/16 5:51 PM
54 | how america lost its secrets
ing with Packer naked in a sauna so he could be sure Packer did not
have a recording device (other than his notebook). Appelbaum stated
repeatedly in interviews that he was being spied upon by America.
While his claims might have sounded paranoid to his interviewers,
as a character in Joseph Heller’s Catch- 22 famously said, “Just
because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t after you.”
Runa Sandvik, a close associate of Appelbaum’s, also worked
tirelessly to extend Tor’s cloak of anonymity in the private sector
against the surveillance of the NSA and other would- be intruders
of privacy. A Norwegian national in her mid- twenties, she wrote a
well- followed blog on Internet privacy for Forbes in 2012, in which
she identified herself as a privacy and security researcher working
at the intersection of technology, law, and policy. Appelbaum and
Sandvik both came in contact with Snowden before he went public
and while he was still working for the NSA in Hawaii.
In 2012, Snowden become involved in the effort to encourage
the use of Tor software to protect privacy. He made no secret of his
concerns about electronic interceptions. According to an anonymous
co- worker, he even wore a jacket to work with a parody of the
NSA insignia, which, instead of merely depicting the NSA eagle,
showed the eagle clutching AT&T phone lines. He had also become
a member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the digital rights
organization that was helping finance Tor. He saw Tor software as a
remedy. “Without Tor,” he later wrote, “when you walk the streets
of the Internet, you’re always watched.” His efforts on behalf of Tor
were not limited to symbolic gestures. In 2012, he set up a twogigabyte
server called “The Signal,” which he described as the largest
Tor relay station exit node in Honolulu. He apparently paid for
it himself.
Through his work as a system administrator for Dell, he found
documents revealing NSA efforts, not yet successful, to defeat Tor’s
ability to camouflage a user’s identity on the Internet. He found that
the NSA was attempting to build backdoor entry ways into Tor software.
One of the NSA documents that he illicitly downloaded, titled
“Tor Stinks,” described the agency’s continuing efforts to penetrate
Tor servers. In addition, he downloaded NSA documents describing
programs begun in 2012 that aimed at searching the Internet for the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 54
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Hacktivist | 55
cyber signatures of foreign parties suspected of hacking into U.S.
government systems.
He also made efforts to directly contact Sandvik. She recalls
first hearing from Snowden in November 2012. He first wrote to
her under the alias Cincinnatus but later supplied his real name
and mailing address in Hawaii because he wanted her to mail him
authentic computer stickers from the Tor Project that he could use
as “swag,” as he wrote her, to attract further interest in Tor software
in Hawaii. As a result, she knew his identity seven months before he
went public in Hong Kong. He would later tell Sandvik from Moscow
that he had been “moonlighting” by working to advance the Tor
Project. He added, with some understatement, that his moonlighting
was “something the NSA might not have been too happy about.”
On November 18, 2012, while still working for Dell at the NSA,
his dual role led him to begin organizing a “CryptoParty” aimed at
finding new recruits for Tor. The CryptoParty movement had been
started in 2012 by Asher Wolf, a radical hacktivist and anarchist living
in Melbourne, Australia. She promoted the get- togethers not
unlike the Tupperware parties of the 1950s. The party organizer,
usually with a representative of the Tor Project, advertised the party
on the Internet. Attendees were encouraged to bring their own laptops
so they could install Tor as well as encryption software in them.
The attendees would then be instructed on how to use it. Finally,
those converted to Tor software would be told to proselytize about
its virtues by holding their own CryptoParty. Wolf’s idea was to use
these gatherings to expand the realm of Tor.
Snowden called his fete the Oahu CryptoParty. It had its own web
page. He told Wolf that it would be the first CryptoParty in Honolulu.
She wrote back advising him to “keep it simple.” (Wolf later
said she did not know he was working at the NSA.)
Snowden apparently had no inhibitions in staging a party that the
leadership of the NSA might consider subversive of its battle against
Tor. He even invited fellow NSA workers in Hawaii, as well as others
in the local computer culture. He asked Sandvik, who was living in
Washington, D.C., at the time, to participate, proposing that she cohost
the party with him. He scheduled it for December 11, 2012, in
Honolulu. According to Sandvik’s account, Snowden informed her
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 55
9/29/16 5:51 PM
56 | how america lost its secrets
that he “had been talking some of the more technical guys at work
into setting up some additional fast servers” for Tor. His “work”
place at the time was the NSA. So, if he was telling the truth, he
had already attempted to find co- workers at the NSA who might be
interested in attending an anti- NSA surveillance presentation.
Sandvik not only agreed to be Snowden’s co- presenter but made
the Oahu CryptoParty a Tor- sponsored event. Sandvik flew to
Honolulu on December 6, 2012. It was a fourteen- hour flight and
a relatively expensive one. She later told Wired magazine that the
invitation from Snowden coincided with her plan to take a “vacation
in Hawaii.” Whatever her reason, it brought her in direct contact
with a Tor supporter with access to the computers of its main enemy,
the NSA.
On December 11, following Snowden’s instructions, Sandvik
arrived shortly before 6:00 p.m. at the Fishcake gallery in downtown
Honolulu. She proceeded through a maze of furniture display rooms
to BoxJelly, a public space. She was then directed to a small back room
in which there were folding chairs and worktables already set up for
the event. Rechung Fujihira, the owner of BoxJelly, told me that Hi
Capacity, a “creative collective” of computer buffs, had arranged the
logistics for the event. As he recalled, Snowden had requested their
help for the CryptoParty.
Sandvik found Snowden waiting for her with Lindsay Mills,
whom he introduced to Sandvik as his girlfriend. He told Sandvik
that Mills was there to make a video of the event. Mills did not mention
the party in her blog. But that Snowden brought her and introduced
her to Sandvik suggests that he did not keep secret from her
his activities to further Tor.
The event started at 6:00 p.m. sharp. By Sandvik’s count, about
twenty people gradually filled the room. She reckoned that about
half of the attendees were from Snowden’s workplace. Snowden
began the presentation by giving reasons why Internet users needed
to defend their privacy by using both encryption and Tor software.
According to one attendee who asked not to be identified by name,
Snowden, while not revealing that he worked for the NSA, spoke
with such precise knowledge about government surveillance capabilities
that the attendee suspected Snowden worked for the govern-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 56
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Hacktivist | 57
ment. Snowden next introduced Sandvik, who took the podium and
discussed the work of the Tor Project, stressing the importance of
expanding the Tor network. Following their presentations, Snowden
and Sandvik took questions from the audience.
The Oahu CryptoParty, according to Sandvik, ended about
10:00 p.m. No one objected to Mills’s making a video of the meeting,
even though it was dedicated to the idea of protecting personal
privacy. The video was not posted on the Internet, so presumably
Snowden wanted it for his own purposes. Afterward, Sandvik went
to a local diner called Zippy’s for a late dinner. She left Hawaii two
days later.
Not all the hacktivists that Snowden invited were able to attend.
Parker Higgins, for example, a prime mover in the Electronic Frontier
Foundation and founder of the San Francisco CryptoParty, wrote
back to him that he was unable to attend the December CryptoParty
because of the high price of the airfare that month between San Francisco
and Honolulu. He added that he would try to attend Snowden’s
next CryptoParty, which was scheduled for February 23, 2013. (Higgins
would make headlines in 2013 by flying a chartered blimp over
the NSA’s secret facility in Utah and photographing it from the air.)
Snowden’s double duty continued: downloading secret documents
while remaining in touch with some of the leading figures
in the Tor Project under his various aliases. He also continued to
invite activists to his CryptoParties, and he openly advertised them
on the Internet until 2013. The CIA’s former deputy director Morell,
who reviewed the security situation at the NSA in 2014 as a member
of President Obama’s NSA Review Committee, found that the
NSA in the post– Cold War age had encouraged its technical workers
to freely discuss challenges that arose in its computer operations.
“The idea was to spread knowledge and learn from the successes
of others,” Morell wrote, “but it created enormous security vulnerability,
given the always- existent risk of an insider committed to
stealing secrets.” According to a former intelligence executive, this
new “open culture,” exemplified by largely unrestricted entry to the
NSANet by civilian contractors, fit the culture of the young civilians
on the “geek squads” who now ran the NSA’s computer networks.
It was remarkable that even in such an “open culture,” Snowden’s
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 57
9/29/16 5:51 PM
58 | how america lost its secrets
CryptoParty, Tor station, and other anti- NSA activities could go
unremarked upon. After all, ten or so NSA workers attended the
first party, and it is not unlikely that many of them recognized
him as their co- worker. If so, they knew (as did Sandvik and Mills)
that the Tor advocate “Cincinnatus” was Snowden. He had also not
been shy in contacting notable enemies of the NSA via e- mail, such
as Jacob Appelbaum, Parker Higgins, and Asher Wolf. If anyone,
including the security staff of the NSA, had been on the lookout for
dissident intelligence workers, this well- advertised gathering and its
organizer might have been of interest.
In 2014, I asked a former top NSA executive whether such activities
on behalf of Tor by an NSA employee would arouse the attention
of the NSA’s own “Q” counterespionage unit. He answered,
“Snowden was not an NSA employee.” Because Snowden was a
contract employee of Dell’s residing in the United States, the NSA
could not legally monitor his private activities or intercept his communication.
To do so would require a court- approved FBI request. So
Snowden/Cincinnatus was free to operate openly in recruiting NSA
workers, hacktivists, and computer buffs for his events. Ironically,
adversary intelligence services searching for disgruntled intelligence
workers had no such constraints.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 58
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 7
String Puller
It wasn’t that they put it on me as an individual— that I’m uniquely
qualified [or] an angel descending from the heavens— as that they
put it on someone, somewhere.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013
Downloading NSA documents was not Snowden’s only rogue
activity while working at the NSA for Dell in 2012. Three
weeks after the CryptoParty, Snowden began anonymously contacting
a high- profile journalist. He used the same alias, Cincinnatus,
that he used with Sandvik and to advertise the Oahu CryptoParty.
The journalist to whom he wrote on December 1, 2012, was Glenn
Greenwald, the previously mentioned Rio- based columnist for The
Guardian.
Greenwald had not always been an activist journalist. He had
been a litigation lawyer at the elite New York firm of Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz. He was also an entrepreneur, owning part of
Master Notions, a company that, among other things, had a 50 percent
financial interest in the pornographic website HJ (an acronym
that originally stood for “Hairy Jock”). All did not go well with this
enterprise. In 2004, Greenwald became involved in an acrimonious
lawsuit with his other associates in HJ. As a result, he had a number
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 59
9/29/16 5:51 PM
60 | how america lost its secrets
of open legal judgments filed against him, including an $85,000 lien
by the IRS.
After resigning from his law firm in 2005, he moved to Rio de
Janeiro and began a new career as a blogger for the Internet magazine
Salon. He wrote fierce, and often brilliant, polemics against U.S.
government surveillance and other perceived intrusions on personal
privacy. The extent of his bitter antagonism toward the activities of
the “surveillance state,” as he called it, was reflected in the title of
his 2006 book, How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Values
from a President Run Amok. His position on surveillance was
unrelenting, even when it came to the president. “By ordering illegal
eavesdropping, the president had committed crimes and should be
held accountable for them,” Greenwald wrote. When Barack Obama
became president in 2009, Greenwald also attacked him for breaking
the law by “ordering illegal eavesdropping.” Because of his opposition
to Obama, he contributed money to the libertarian campaign of
Ron Paul, the same candidate to whom Snowden gave money.
In August 2012, he had transferred his provocative blog, which
had amassed a following of nearly one million readers (including
Snowden), from Salon to The Guardian. The British newspaper
shared his powerful anti- surveillance position, having first published
the WikiLeaks documents that had been illicitly leaked by Manning
and published by Assange in 2010.
Greenwald was an activist as well as a journalist. He joined the
board of directors of the Freedom of the Press Foundation (eventually
Runa Sandvik would join too). It had been set up expressly to
funnel money to both Assange’s WikiLeaks site and the defense fund
for Manning after he was arrested. Such a financial intermediary
was necessary because American credit card companies were blocking
money transfers to these two causes in 2012. This “blockade”
was taking its toll on WikiLeaks. According to Assange, “WikiLeaks
had been cut off from more than 90 percent of its finances.” The
Freedom of the Press Foundation came to its rescue. John Perry Barlow,
one of the songwriters for the Grateful Dead, was one of its
chief financial backers. “The first serious info war is now engaged,”
Barlow declared. “The field of battle is WikiLeaks.” He served with
Greenwald and Poitras on its board.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 60
9/29/16 5:51 PM
String Puller | 61
Snowden was an avid reader of Greenwald’s screeds against the
government. If he were to assume the role of a modern- day Prometheus,
delivering forbidden NSA secrets to the public, Greenwald
would be a logical candidate to break the story. Snowden could safely
assume that Greenwald would be sympathetic to exposing NSA surveillance
from his many blogs, tweets, and YouTube comments on
the subject. For example, on November 13, 2012, just eighteen days
before Snowden contacted him, Greenwald had written a blog for
The Guardian asserting that the United States was “a surveillance
state run amok.” In it, echoing very closely what Snowden said at his
CryptoParty, Greenwald wrote, “Any remnants of internet anonymity
have been all but obliterated between the state and technology
companies.” Citing a story in The Washington Post, he continued,
“Every day, collection systems at the National Security Agency
intercept and store 1.7 billion e- mails, phone calls and other types
of communications.”
As a result, Greenwald called for action in that blog posting, writing,
“The US operates a sprawling, unaccountable Surveillance State
that, in violent breach of the core guarantees of the Fourth Amendment,
monitors and records virtually everything even the most
law- abiding citizens do.” That same week, Snowden invited Runa
Sandvik to co- host his CryptoParty.
One problem for Snowden in reaching out to Greenwald was
Greenwald’s lack of any encryption for his e- mails. Communicating
with a journalist like Greenwald who famously attacked the very
organization for which Snowden worked was itself a risky undertaking,
especially if he wanted to pass classified NSA documents to
him. If his e- mails were intercepted by the NSA in Brazil (where
Greenwald lived) and where the NSA was not restricted by U.S. law,
he could lose his job or even be arrested. As Cincinnatus, he told
Greenwald that he needed to immediately encrypt his computer. To
make his point, he cited Greenwald’s November 12, 2012, blog. In it,
Greenwald noted that General David Petraeus, then the CIA director,
had been caught in a sex scandal because his personal e- mails
had been intercepted. Snowden wrote to Greenwald that Petraeus
would not have been exposed if he had used encryption. Snowden
sent Greenwald instructions on how to install the necessary encryp-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 61
9/29/16 5:51 PM
62 | how america lost its secrets
tion software and a link to a twelve- minute video on encryption
(which might have been the same video he used at his CryptoParty
a few weeks earlier).
Greenwald did not manage to encrypt his computer, however,
and Snowden, unwilling to deal with Greenwald through an unencrypted
channel, broke off contact with him in January 2013. Even
so, he did not give up his plan of using Greenwald in his enterprise.
He merely sought an intermediary who used encryption.
He chose Laura Poitras. He knew she and Greenwald were founding
board members of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. Greenwald
had written about her extensively. For example, he wrote an
entire blog about her confrontation with the U.S. government and
her plans to make a documentary about the “US Government’s
increasing powers of domestic surveillance [through] its expanding
covert domestic NSA activities.”
Since 2011, Poitras had been diligently filming the construction
of a massive NSA repository for data in Bluffdale, Utah. In the antisurveillance
culture, the structure had become symbolic of the powers
of the NSA. In fact, it was the same NSA site that Parker Higgins
photographed from a blimp in the fall of 2013 and posted on the
Internet after Poitras had released her documentary about the NSA’s
use of the Bluffdale repository for domestic spying.
Aside from her connections with Greenwald, Poitras had other
impressive credentials. Born in 1964 in Boston, she came from a
wealthy family that donated large sums of money to philanthropic
causes, including $20 million for research on bipolar disorders. After
graduating from the New School for Public Engagement in 1996,
she pursued a career as an activist filmmaker. Her focus quickly
became exposing NSA surveillance. One of her short documentaries
about the NSA’s domestic surveillance program was featured on the
New York Times website and attracted enormous attention in 2012.
As a dedicated opponent of the surveillance state, she participated
in public events with William Binney, the ex- NSA whistle- blower,
and Jacob Appelbaum. In April 2012, for example, she made a presentation
at the Whitney Museum in New York with Binney and
Appelbaum. She had become such a leading activist against the NSA
by December 2012 that Appelbaum, after lauding her work, inter-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 62
9/29/16 5:51 PM
String Puller | 63
spersed clips from her short film in his keynote address at the Chaos
Computer Club convention of hacktivists in Berlin that month.
Snowden also closely followed her rise in this world. By simply
googling Poitras’s name in January 2013, he would have learned
about her connections with Greenwald, Appelbaum, Binney,
Assange, and other leading figures in the anti- surveillance camp.
When asked later by Poitras why he had chosen her to help him,
Snowden replied, “I didn’t. You chose yourself.” The problem for
Snowden was anonymously drawing her into his enterprise.
Poitras was living in Berlin in January 2013, which made her vulnerable
to NSA surveillance. To get to her through an encrypted
channel, Snowden chose a circuitous approach. On January 11, he
wrote to Micah Lee in Berkeley, California. Given Lee’s residence
in the United States, as Snowden knew, the NSA would be legally
barred from monitoring his communications without a warrant.
He used Lee, who was the chief technology officer at the Freedom
of the Press Foundation, as the encrypted gateway to Poitras. Lee
was also well- connected to others whom Snowden had contacted
for his CryptoParty. Lee had been an associate of Runa Sandvik’s at
Tor and was a prominent member of Noisebridge, an eclectic antigovernment
hackers’ commune based in Northern California, of
which Appelbaum was also a member.
To contact Lee, Snowden chose the alias Anon108. Anon is an
alias frequently used by members of the Anonymous commune
of hacktivists. “I’m a friend,” Snowden wrote to Lee. “I need to get
information securely to Laura Poitras and her alone, but I can’t find
an email gpg key for her.” The “gpg” encryption key he asked for,
more commonly called a PGP key, was the so- called public key for
an encryption system called Pretty Good Privacy, or, for short, PGP.
This encryption system required both a public and a private key.
Snowden asked Lee to provide the former one, because Poitras had
the latter one. Lee wrote to Poitras about Anon108. The next day,
with the approval of Poitras, Lee supplied Poitras’s public key to
Snowden, or, as he knew him, Anon108.
With it, Snowden contacted Poitras directly. He asked her as a first
step to open an anonymous e- mail account using Tor software. Poitras
later wrote about this initial contact, “I was at that point film-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 63
9/29/16 5:51 PM
64 | how america lost its secrets
ing with several people who were all being targeted by the [U.S.]
government.” Many of the people she was filming, including Appelbaum,
Assange, Binney, and the former NSA employee Thomas
Drake, could attract interest by U.S. or foreign intelligence services.
Snowden asked Poitras to take out a new enciphering key to use
exclusively for her liaison with him. It provided them both with an
extra layer of protection from any surveillance by law enforcement.
Presumably, she accommodated his requests because she anticipated
that the anonymous person would use this encrypted channel to
send her highly sensitive material.
On January 23, Snowden wrote to Poitras under yet another alias.
This time he called himself Citizen Four. He wrote, “At this stage I
can offer nothing more than my word.” He then said falsely, “I am
a senior government employee in the intelligence community.” She
had no way of knowing at this “stage” that despite giving her his
“word,” he was not who he claimed to be. He was not a “government
employee,” he was not a “senior” official, and he was not a member
of the “intelligence community” (which is composed of the intelligence
services of the U.S. government). He would later also claim
to her that he had been “a senior adviser to the CIA” and “a senior
adviser to the DIA.” That was untrue, too. In January 2013, he was
merely a contract employee of Dell’s working as a computer technician
at the NSA base in Hawaii.
Snowden told her in his initial e- mail that he was well acquainted
with her career as an anti- surveillance activist. He said that he had
read Greenwald’s account in Salon that past April, a blog in which
Greenwald detailed the forty times in which Poitras was searched by
U.S. authorities. The story also said that Poitras believed she was on
a special watch list and under constant U.S. government surveillance.
She had come under such scrutiny by U.S. authorities, it turned out,
because of her documentary about American military abuses of civilians
in Iraq in 2006, titled My Country, My Country. While filming
it, she was at a place close to an insurgent ambush of U.S. troops in
Iraq. Her presence at the ambush site led army intelligence officers
to suspect (without any evidence) that she might have been tipped
off by the insurgents. She firmly denied the charge, and the government
never substantiated it. Even so, because of this incident, since
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 64
9/29/16 5:51 PM
String Puller | 65
2006 she had been kept on a list that caused authorities to search her
at airports. As a result, she took elaborate countermeasures to evade
any possible surveillance of her communications.
Snowden knew about this incident because Greenwald described
it in great detail in a blog that Snowden read (as he later told Greenwald).
“Poitras is now forced to take extreme steps— ones that hamper
her ability to do her work,” Greenwald wrote. “She now avoids
traveling with any electronic devices. She uses alternative methods
to deliver the most sensitive parts of her work— raw film and interview
notes— to secure locations. She spends substantial time and
resources protecting her computers with encryption and password
defenses. Especially when she is in the US, she avoids talking on
the phone about her work, particularly to sources. And she simply
will not edit her films at her home out of fear— obviously well
grounded— that government agents will attempt to search and seize
the raw footage.” She claimed, as she told journalists, she was the
victim of “Kafkaesque government harassment.”
Snowden was duly impressed with her concerns about government
surveillance, which he agreed was ubiquitous. Indeed, he later
described her as “more paranoid when it comes to electronic security
than I can be.” He meant it as a compliment. Such functional paranoia
or “operational security,” as Greenwald would call the precautions
that she took, dovetailed with Snowden’s growing conviction
that universal encryption was necessary to defeat the surveillance
state. It also made her the perfect channel for Snowden to safely pass
some of the classified documents he stole to Greenwald and other
journalists.
It was not difficult to get her to cooperate in his plot. He wrote,
for example, “The surveillance you’ve experienced means you have
been ‘selected’— a term which will mean more to you as you learn
how the modern SIGINT [signals intelligence] system works.” Just
as she had been “chosen” by her work to act as his conduit, according
to Snowden, she had been chosen by the NSA as a target because
of her work. The idea of her being “selected” by an invisible signals
intelligence agency, the NSA, could only excite her longtime concerns
about being watched by the government.
“Your victimization by the NSA system means that you are well
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 65
9/29/16 5:51 PM
66 | how america lost its secrets
aware of the threat that [the NSA’s] unrestricted, secret abilities pose
for democracies,” he continued. “I hope you understand that contacting
you is extremely high risk and if you are willing to agree
to the following precautions before I share more, this will not be a
waste of your time.” Further playing on her concern, he asked her to
confirm to him “that no one has ever had a copy of your private key
and that it uses a strong pass phrase.” Such precautions were necessary
because “your adversary is capable of one trillion guesses per
second.” That “adversary” was, as she knew from her previous film,
the NSA. At this point, she knew she was entering into a dangerous
liaison with an unknown party in pursuit of NSA secrets. She wondered
if he might be part of a plan to entrap her or her contacts like
Assange and Appelbaum, as she noted in her diary. “Is C4 a trap?”
she asked herself, referring to her Citizen Four source. “Will he put
me in prison?”
To elude this “adversary,” Snowden stressed to Poitras that she
would have to adopt a conspiratorial frame of mind. “If the device
you store the private key and enter your pass phrase on has been
hacked, it is trivial to decrypt our communications,” he explained. “If
you publish the source material, I will likely be immediately implicated.”
If her correspondent could be “immediately implicated,” it
meant that he was a person authorized to handle these secrets. So
Poitras knew, as early as January 2013, that she was creating an
encrypted channel for someone with access to NSA secrets who
would be incriminated by providing them to her.
The key source for Poitras’s previously referred to short video
was Binney. Like her new source, he had been authorized to handle
NSA secrets. Binney had been an NSA technical director until he
had retired in 2001. The NSA’s domestic surveillance program that
Binney told the press about years before being interviewed in Poitras’s
film was called Stellarwind. It involved data mining domestic
communications and financial transactions that had been authorized
by President George W. Bush in 2001 after 9/11 as commander- inchief
under the war powers given to him following the attacks. It
indeed led to a major exposé on domestic spying by The New York
Times in December 2005.
Binney had never provided Poitras with any NSA documents
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 66
9/30/16 11:09 AM
String Puller | 67
to back up the charges he made that Stellarwind was an unlawful
domestic surveillance operation. He could not have done so without
violating his sworn oath and, for that matter, U.S. anti- espionage
statutes. Binney made it clear to her and other journalists that he
was not a lawbreaker. But her new source, C4, was willing to do
what Binney (and other insiders) had refused to do. He was offering
in these e- mails to provide her with secret government documents,
even though it would implicate him as an outlaw. To further
whet her appetite, he told her that these up- to- date NSA documents
would fully substantiate the allegations that Binney made in her
film. Even more important, he said Binney’s 2001 disclosures were
still relevant to her cause. “What you know as Stellarwind has
grown,” he wrote to her. “The expanded special source operations
that took over Stellarwind’s share of the pie have spread all over the
world to practically include comprehensive coverage of the United
States.” In fact, as Snowden knew from the Inspector General report
he had read, the NSA had terminated Stellarwind almost a decade
earlier. President Bush ended it after top officials of the Justice
Department insisted that he did not have the legal authority for the
domestic part of Stellarwind. Instead, he asked Congress to revise
FISA to meet the objections of the Justice Department. The result
was the FISA Amendment Act of 2006. Unlike the previous Stellarwind
program, it did not permit domestic surveillance. It specified
that the government could not target any person in the United
States or anywhere else in the world under this authority. Nor could
it target any foreign person, even one residing outside of the United
States, to acquire information from a particular known person inside
the United States. As the act recognized that information about U.S.
citizens might mistakenly be intercepted by the NSA, it required
that such data about Americans be expunged in a bimonthly review
by a Justice Department task force. Although the NSA program in
place in 2013 was not the comprehensive domestic surveillance that
Snowden claimed it to be, Poitras had no way of knowing at this
early state that her source was misleading her.
He offered to substantiate her worst fears about the growth of
NSA surveillance: “I know the location of most domestic interception
points, and that the largest telecommunication companies in the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 67
9/30/16 11:09 AM
68 | how america lost its secrets
US are betraying the trust of their customers, which I can prove.”
He even proffered evidence implicating President Barack Obama in
illegal surveillance. “There is a detailed policy framework, a kind of
martial law for cyber operations, created by the White House. It’s
called presidential policy 20,” he wrote to her. It was an eighteenpage
directive that Obama had signed four months earlier in October
2012. Snowden was offering to reveal to her up- to- date evidence
of a surveillance state in America presided over by the president
himself. It was what she had been searching for over the past three
years. How could she, as an activist filmmaker, resist such a sensational
offer?
He further explained to her that he had placed great trust in her
discretion. “No one, not even my most trusted confidante, is aware
of my intentions, and it would not be fair for them to fall under suspicion
for my actions,” he said.
Poitras must have found it flattering that a total stranger was
willing to disclose to her in e- mails what he would not tell even his
“most trusted confidante” about his intentions to commit an illicit
breach of U.S. national security. It also put her under enormous
stress. She noted in her journal that the pressure made her feel as if
she were “underwater.” “I am battling with my nervous system. It
doesn’t let me rest or sleep. Eye twitches, clenched throat, and now
literally waiting to be raided.”
Snowden was also taking an extraordinary risk. After all, he had
no way of knowing who else she told about him. She had long been
concerned, with good reason, that the U.S. government was out to
get her. An unknown person offering to supply her with secret documents
could be attempting to entrap her. So Snowden could not preclude
the possibility that she would consult with others about the
offer he was making her. Because her current documentary project
included interviews by her with Assange, Appelbaum, and three ex-
NSA executives, intelligence services with sophisticated surveillance
capabilities might also have taken a professional interest in her communications,
as Poitras herself had suspected. Even if Snowden was
somehow able to use his position as a system administrator at Dell
to ascertain that the NSA did not have Poitras under surveillance, he
could not be sure that other agencies, such as the Russian and Chi-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 68
9/29/16 5:51 PM
String Puller | 69
nese intelligence services, were not monitoring his communications
with her. It was, however, a chance Snowden was willing to take.
Snowden, in any case, did not intend to conceal his identity for
more than a few months. He told Poitras he had a specific purpose
in allowing her to name him in her ongoing film project. Indeed,
he said it was essential in his plan to prevent others, including presumably
his “most trusted confidante,” from being suspected by law
enforcement of helping him in his enterprise. He prevailed on her
to accommodate his plan, saying, “You may be the only one who
can prevent that, and that is by immediately nailing me to the cross
rather than trying to protect me as a source.” His choice of the imagery
of crucifixion suggested that like Jesus Christ he was willing to
sacrifice himself for the sake of others.
In keeping with their operational security arrangement, Snowden
said that he would first send her an encrypted file of documents that
she would not be able to read. Only after his conditions were met and
“everything else is done,” he said, “the key will follow.” He was now
pulling the strings. To get that key, she had to follow his instructions.
One of his conditions was that she help him recruit Greenwald
and other outlets for his disclosures. “The material provided and
the investigative effort required will be too much for any one person,”
he wrote to Poitras. He next directed her to contact Greenwald.
“I recommend that at the very minimum you involve Greenwald. I
believe you know him.” (Snowden apparently did not tell her that
he had unsuccessfully attempted to reach out to Greenwald before he
had contacted her.)
His continued interest in Greenwald was understandable. Aside
from Greenwald’s opposition to what he called the “Surveillance
State,” he was a gateway to The Guardian. That publication had
become an important player in the business of disclosing government
documents by publishing a large part of the U.S. documents
supplied to WikiLeaks, as we have seen. By breaking whistleblowing
stories about U.S. intelligence, it had also greatly increased
the circulation of its website. As an establishment newspaper, it also
gave these WikiLeaks stories credibility with the media. So despite
Greenwald’s inability to create an encrypted channel, Snowden still
needed him. He had no reason to believe that Greenwald would turn
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 69
9/29/16 5:51 PM
70 | how america lost its secrets
down the opportunity for a whistle- blowing scoop for The Guardian.
After all, the classified documents Snowden would provide him
would also give credence to both Greenwald’s book and his many
blogs denouncing U.S. government surveillance.
Aside from Greenwald and Poitras, Snowden sought an outlet
inside the American establishment. So he had Poitras write to Barton
Gellman, the Pulitzer Prize– winning reporter for The Washington
Post. Poitras had met Gellman in 2010, when they were both fellows
at NYU’s Center on Law and Security. Poitras had requested help
in encrypting her computer from Karen Greenberg, the executive
director of the center, who took her “by the hand” to meet Gellman,
Greenberg’s resident expert on encryption software. Born in 1960,
Gellman graduated from Princeton in 1981 and became an awardwinning
investigative reporter for the Miami Herald, the Post, and
Time magazine. He was also the author of Angler: The Cheney Vice
Presidency. If Gellman could be drawn into the enterprise, he could
provide Snowden with a gateway to the prestigious American paper
credited with bringing down President Richard Nixon in the Watergate
scandal.
Poitras, as the go- between for Snowden, immediately contacted
Gellman. After telling him she was involved in a story about NSA
surveillance, she suggested that they meet in New York City.
For their rendezvous, Poitras took a number of precautions to
evade anyone attempting to follow her. She had Gellman first meet
her in one coffee shop in lower Manhattan. When he arrived, she had
him follow her on foot to another coffee shop, following her antisurveillance
tradecraft. Once assured no one was watching them, she
ordered coffee for herself and Gellman. Over coffee, she told Gellman
about Snowden, whom she described as her anonymous source.
She said that he was willing to supply Gellman with documents that
would expose domestic surveillance, if Gellman agreed to write a
story on it for the Post. Even though Gellman had left the staff of
the Post in 2010, he had previously written several stories on that
subject for the newspaper, and he was also highly regarded by the
editors there. Gellman was interested in Poitras’s offer (although he
would consult a friend at the Justice Department about the legality
of publishing NSA documents).
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 70
9/29/16 5:51 PM
String Puller | 71
Snowden had now laid the groundwork for at least two possible
outlets. Poitras, however, was having some difficulty in bringing
Greenwald in on the plan. Like Snowden, she did not trust writing
to him in unencrypted e- mails, and because Greenwald lived in Brazil,
she still had not found an opportunity for a face- to- face meeting
with him.
That opportunity arose in mid- April 2013. Greenwald had flown
to the United States to give the lead speech at an event in Yonkers,
New York, sponsored by the Council on American- Islamic Relations,
a pro- Muslim civil rights organization. He had delivered the
keynote speech at its previous meeting in San Jose, California, where
his impassioned depiction of the American “Surveillance State”
received a rousing ovation from the attendees. He was invited to
speak at this award dinner for its East Coast chapter.
Poitras flew from Berlin to New York to see him. On April 19,
2013, she arranged to meet Greenwald at noon in the restaurant of
the Marriott hotel where Greenwald was staying. When Greenwald
arrived at the restaurant carrying a cell phone, she explained to him
that the NSA could surreptitiously turn his cell phone into a microphone
and use it to eavesdrop on their conversation. She told him to
go back to his room and leave his phone there. When he returned,
phoneless, she took further precautions by having them change
tables several times. Greenwald accepted these tactics because, as he
later said, she was in charge of their “operational security.”
When they finally settled at a table in the nearly empty restaurant,
she showed Greenwald e- mails she had received from Citizen
Four. Greenwald, as he recounted, made “no connection” to the
“long- forgotten emails” he had received from Snowden under the
alias Cincinnatus. Reading the e- mails that Snowden had sent to
Poitras, he was impressed with the “sincerity” of the anonymous
correspondent.
When Poitras showed Greenwald Citizen Four’s mission statement
in which he said his motive was to end the U.S. “surveillance
state,” Greenwald was further impressed with the source. The surveillance
state Snowden described closely dovetailed with the surveillance
state that Greenwald had described himself in his speech
at the Council on American- Islamic Relations dinner in 2012. Of
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 71
9/29/16 5:51 PM
72 | how america lost its secrets
course, the similarity of the phrasing might not have been entirely
coincidental. Greenwald’s 2012 speech had been put on YouTube and
widely circulated on the Internet just a few days before Snowden
first wrote to him on December 1, 2012. Snowden identified himself
as a privacy advocate, which was also how Greenwald often identified
himself in his speeches. He also echoed other concerns Greenwald
had publicly expressed, including defending American privacy
from government intrusions.
Snowden promised the leaks he would supply would provide dramatic
results. He asserted in one of his e- mails to Poitras that the
“shock” of the documents he would give Greenwald would result in
the public’s learning about the secret “mechanisms through which
our privacy is violated.” According to Snowden’s assessment, following
that initial uproar, they could achieve another objective in their
common cause. “We can guarantee for all people equal protection
against unreasonable search,” he wrote. In light of this convergence
of views, it is not surprising that Greenwald was fully convinced
of Citizen Four’s bona fides. He said to Poitras, “He’s real,” and he
agreed to help break the story in The Guardian.
Poitras now revealed to Greenwald that Citizen Four would deliver
an entire trove of secret documents to them in six to eight weeks.
According to this timetable, the Greenwald scoop and the “shock”
Citizen Four promised would come in early to mid- June 2013.
At this point in April, Snowden was in full control. Although
his job at Dell involved endlessly monitoring largely meaningless
encrypted messages in the NSA tunnel, he had been able to get three
major journalists to react favorably to his proposal. None of them
knew his name, position, age, location, or where precisely he worked.
Nor did they know the means by which he planned to obtain the
secrets that he dangled before them. They also did not know where,
or even if, they would meet their source. Their total knowledge about
him was the description he improperly gave of himself: a “senior
government employee in the intelligence community” (Greenwald
speculated that he was a disgruntled CIA station chief).
Even though they were operating largely in the dark, these three
journalists acted as almost any other ambitious reporter would if he
or she were offered a major scoop about illegal acts of the govern-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 72
9/29/16 5:51 PM
String Puller | 73
ment. In addition, the information was in line with what they had
previously investigated or written about. None of these journalists
had any reason to doubt at this point that their anonymous source
was anything but the sincere whistle- blower he claimed to be. They
could not have known from his anonymous e- mails that aside from
the whistle- blowing documents he promised them, he was in the
process of stealing a large number of other documents that concerned
the NSA’s sources and methods in foreign countries. These
documents, to which Snowden never referred in his correspondence
with them, had little if anything at all to do with domestic spying on
American citizens.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 73
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 8
Raider of the Inner Sanctum
They think there’s a smoking gun in there that would be the
death of them all politically.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
The nightmare of the NSA is a penetration. As the CIA, the
FBI, and the NSA found out in the 1990s, no intelligence service
is invulnerable to it. Any employee of a large intelligence organization
can turn, or be turned, against it. Among the more than ten
thousand intelligence workers employed by the NSA, it is a near
certainty that over time more than one of them will become dissatisfied
with their work. A worker may have a personal grievance
about salary, lack of promotion, or treatment by his or her superiors.
Disenchantment with the NSA may also proceed from idealistic
objections. The NSA is in the business of secretly intercepting
messages, and an insider could come to find its spying activities at
odds with his or her own beliefs about the violation of privacy. For
any of these reasons, a disgruntled insider could go rogue. He or she
then might attempt to right a perceived wrong by disclosing NSA
secrets to another party. That party might then induce or blackmail
the rogue employee into disclosing further secrets.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 74
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Raider of the Inner Sanctum | 75
To guard against this, the NSA has developed a well- organized
system for stratifying its data so that obtaining critical secrets
required a rogue employee to burrow into its heavily protected inner
sanctum. As part of this system, the NSA divides its data into different
tiers depending on the importance of the secrets to its operations.
The first tier, Level 1, is mainly administrative material. This data
would include FISA court orders and other directives its employees
might need to check on to carry out their tasks. Level 2 contains
data from which the secret sources have been removed. This tier,
available to other intelligence services and policy makers, includes
reports and analysis that can be shared. Level 3 contains documents
that cannot be shared outside a small group of authorized individuals,
because they disclose the secret sources through which the NSA
surreptitiously obtained the information. This third tier includes,
for example, compiled lists of sources in China, Russia, Iran, and
other adversary countries. It also discloses the exotic methods the
NSA uses to get some of this data. Level 3 documents also include
reports on specific NSA, CIA, and Pentagon operations unknown to
adversaries. These Level 3 documents are described by NSA executives
as “the Keys to the Kingdom,” because they could invalidate
America’s entire intelligence enterprise if they fell into the hands of
an adversary. And, as far as is known, prior to 2013, there had been
no successful theft of any Level 3 documents.
Because of their extreme sensitivity, Level 3 documents were not
handled by most of the private firms providing independent contractors.
At Dell, Snowden had access mainly to Level 1 and Level 2 data
(which he could, and did, download from shared sites on NSANet).
These lower- level documents had whistle- blowing potential because
they concerned NSA operations in the United States. They did not
reveal, however, sources that the NSA used in intercepting the military
and civilian activities of foreign adversaries.
Snowden quit his job at Dell as a system administrator on
March 15, 2013, to take another job working for the NSA in Hawaii
at Booz Allen Hamilton. Unlike other outside contractors that serviced
the NSA, the firm he now chose specialized in handling the
NSA’s Level 3 data.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 75
9/29/16 5:51 PM
76 | how america lost its secrets
When Snowden applied to Booz Allen earlier in March 2013, the
company had no opening for a system administrator at the National
Threat Operations Center, an NSA unit in which it dealt with
Level 3 data. It did have an opening for an infrastructure analyst, a
lower- paying job involving maintaining the computer technology
necessary to monitor threats. Despite a cut in pay, Snowden took
that job. “Snowden was an IT guy, not a SIGINT analyst,” a former
NSA Signals Intelligence officer pointed out. “He was working as a
contracted infrastructure analyst for NSA’s Information Assurance
arm, . . . [which, ironically as it turned out] protects classified U.S.
communications from potential intruders.” Steven Bay, the manager
at Booz Allen who hired and supervised Snowden, recalled that the
first “red flag” came up soon after Snowden began he training, when
“Snowden began asking about a highly classified mass-surveillance
program” to which Snowden did not have access (although Bay did).
In retrospect, Bay realized that Snowden had applied for the job for a
specific reason. “He targeted our [Booz Allen] contract directly,” Bay
said. “Somehow he figured out that our contract, and what we did
on that contract, were the types of gates he needed to get access to.”
Snowden subsequently told the South China Morning Post that
he took this job to “get access to lists of machines all over the world
the NSA had hacked.” If so, he was after the keys to the NSA’s kingdom
of global surveillance. Booz Allen held those keys. “He targeted
my company because we enjoy more access than other companies,”
Booz Allen’s vice- chairman Michael McConnell said with the benefit
of hindsight. As a result of the theft, he appraised, “an entire generation
of intelligence was lost.” McConnell, a former NSA director,
was in a position to know.
Snowden’s sudden career change had both advantages and disadvantages
for the enterprise he was planning. The main advantage
was that he would have proximity to the computers in which were
kept the “lists” he sought of NSA global sources. The main disadvantage,
aside from a cut in salary, was that he would no longer be a
system administrator. This change meant he would no longer have
privileges to bypass password restrictions or temporarily transfer
data. Instead, as an infrastructure analyst, he would not have pass-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 76
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Raider of the Inner Sanctum | 77
word access, at least during the two- month- long training period, to
the computers that he had not been specifically “read into,” which
did not include those computers that stored the Level 3 lists. Access
to these tightly controlled compartments was limited to only a handful
of analysts at the center who had a need to know.
Because the new job entailed handling higher- level secret documents,
Booz Allen had stricter requirements for applicants than
Dell. To slip by them, Snowden had engaged in a minor subterfuge.
He wrote on his application that he was expecting a master’s degree
from the online division of Liverpool University in England. In fact,
he had not completed a single course at Liverpool and would not be
receiving any sort of a degree from it. Booz Allen did not verify this
and had agreed to hire him as a trainee- analyst. It did not change
that decision even after it found out about his subterfuge.
According to Admiral McConnell, Snowden never actually
worked in the Booz Allen offices, which are housed in a skyscraper in
downtown Honolulu. Instead, he was immediately assigned to work
at the NSA’s highly sensitive National Threat Operations Center at
the Kunia base, the same location where he had worked for Dell.
Before he could begin working there, however, he needed to fly to
Maryland to take a mandatory orientation course at the NSA. The
course was given in an eleven- story building, with a sheer wall of
black glass, on the NSA’s 350- acre campus at Fort Meade. He arrived
there from Hawaii on April 1, 2013. Like every other Booz Allen
contractor who worked at the NSA’s center, Snowden was required
to sign the “Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure
Agreement.” In this document, Snowden acknowledged that he had
been granted access to sensitive compartmented information, called
SCI, as part of his work and that he understood that any disclosure
of that information to an unauthorized person would violate federal
criminal law. He was also told, as were all new contract employees
at Booz Allen, that its disclosure could damage the interests of
the United States and benefit its enemies. In signing the document,
he swore an oath not to divulge any of this information without
first receiving written approval from U.S. authorities. So less than
two months before he downloaded sensitive compartmented infor-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 77
9/29/16 5:51 PM
78 | how america lost its secrets
mation, he was fully aware of what the consequences of divulging
this information would be. By this time, as we know, he had already
agreed to deliver classified data to three journalists.
Snowden believed that bringing complaints to NSA lawyers or
supervisors was, as he put it, “playing with fire.” “When I was at
NSA,” Snowden later said in Moscow, “everybody knew that for
anything more serious than workplace harassment, going through
the official process was a career-ender at best.”
Nevertheless, on April 5, 2013, while still in the training facility
in Maryland, he apparently sought to establish a paper trail for himself.
He wrote a letter to NSA’s Office of the General Counsel asking
whether or not NSA directives take precedence over acts of Congress.
A lawyer from the Office of the General Counsel responded
three days later, addressing Snowden as “Dear Ed.” The lawyer said
that acts of Congress take precedence over NSA directives. He also
suggested that “Ed” phone him if he needed any further clarification.
Presumably, Snowden had asked the question to elicit a reply
he could later use to bolster his claim that the NSA had ignored or
rejected policies regarding NSA directives. Instead, the “Dear Ed”
response was of little use to Snowden, because it did not dispute his
point that NSA directives must lawfully conform to the acts of Congress.
The NSA lawyer never heard back from “Ed.”
Snowden completed his orientation course at Fort Meade on Friday,
April 12, 2013. While he was in Maryland, he took time off to
pay visits to both of his divorced parents. It would be the last time he
would see either of them in the United States.
He returned on April 13 to Hawaii. One domestic task he had to
attend to was helping Mills pack up their possessions, which they
stored in boxes in the garage. The lease on their house was up on
April 30, 2013, and they had to move. According to Mills, they found
a temporary rental just a few blocks away.
On Monday, April 15, Snowden began on- the- job training as
an analyst at the National Threat Operations Center. He would
not complete the course. The same week he began the training, he
prepared his exit by writing to Booz Allen and saying he needed a
brief medical leave in May to undergo treatment for epilepsy symptoms.
As far as is known, he did not suffer from epilepsy. Booz Allen
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 78
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Raider of the Inner Sanctum | 79
required a minimum of one month’s notice for foreign travel. By
making the request, he lessened the likelihood that it would arouse
undue suspicion when he departed for Hong Kong with stolen documents
on May 18. This brief window left him some four weeks to
take the lists that he coveted.
Snowden carried out the heist with precision reminiscent of a
Mission: Impossible movie caper. First, he needed to get passwords to
up to twenty- four compartments at the National Threat Operations
Center that he had not been read into. Even in the “open culture”
of the NSA, this was not an easy challenge. He would be asking
one or more intelligence professionals to break strict NSA rules
that not only prohibited them from disclosing their passwords to an
unauthorized party such as himself but required them to report any
unauthorized person who asked to use their passwords. Remarkably,
he accomplished this incredible feat. He gained access to twenty- four
compartments containing the NSA’s most closely guarded secrets in
a matter of a few weeks.
Next, he had to find the lists he was seeking in a vast ocean of
data. For this task, he used software applications called spiders to
crawl through the data and find the files he was after. He deployed
these robotic spiders, which presumably had been programmed in
advance, soon after he began working at the center. According to the
subsequent NSA damage assessment, Snowden’s spiders indexed
well over one million documents. Many of those that he copied and
moved were from Level 3 sensitive compartmented information,
according to the NSA analysis. The spiders also made his penetration
relatively safe. As previously mentioned, the Hawaii base did
not have a real- time auditing system. So alarm bells did not go off in
the security office when he indexed documents.
Finally, Snowden had to find a way to transfer this data to a computer
with an opened USB port. This task was complicated by a security
precaution. Most of the computers at the center had had their
ports sealed shut to prevent unauthorized downloads. Making the
transfer even more difficult, he was working as an analyst in training
in an open- plan office with closed- circuit security cameras. But it
was not impossible. System administrators sometimes used service
computers that had unsealed ports to back up data before they did
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 79
9/29/16 5:51 PM
80 | how america lost its secrets
maintenance work. Even though Snowden was no longer a system
administrator, he could still perhaps befriend a system administrator
or even steal or borrow a service computer.
Whatever the NSA’s and Booz Allen’s security measures, Snowden
succeeded in getting the files. In a matter of a few weeks, he managed
to download hundreds of thousands of Level 3 documents to an
unsealed computer. He also took some less sensitive documents from
the administrative file (which contained mainly Level 1 documents)
at the end of April. These later acquisitions included an order from
the FISA court issued on April 25, 2013.
He had completed the operation by May 17, the last day he would
ever enter the NSA facility. He transferred the data he had amassed
on the service computer, including the lists of the computers in Russia
and China that the NSA had succeeded in penetrating, onto storage
devices, which he later said were thumb drives. Then he coolly
walked past the security guards at the exit, who only seldom performed
random checks on NSA employees.
He carried out the entire operation with such brilliant stealth that
he left few if any clues behind as to how he obtained his colleagues’
passwords to multiple compartments, moved the data from many
different supposedly sealed computers to an opened service machine,
or downloaded these documents to multiple thumb drives without
arousing suspicion. The NSA would not discover the theft for fifteen
days.
His departure from Hawaii was also well prepared. Lindsay Mills
had departed that morning for a planned two- week visit to the outer
islands. This trip allowed him to pack his belongings without saying
anything to her that might be difficult for her to later explain. He
simply left a note that she could show to authorities saying that he
was away on a “business trip.” He informed Bay that he would have
to go in for epilepsy tests on the following Monday and Tuesday. If
the results weren’t good, he might have to be out even longer.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 80
9/29/16 5:51 PM
chapter 9
Escape Artist
I’m not self- destructive. I don’t want to self- immolate and erase
myself from the pages of history. But if we don’t take chances, we
can’t win.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
The next evening, May 18, Snowden drove to Honolulu International
Airport. He left his leased car in the parking lot. He
took with him only carry- on baggage, including a backpack and a
laptop with a Tor sticker on it. “I took everything I had on my back,”
he said, referring to the backpack. He also said that he took enough
cash to pay for his fugitive life and he took the thumb drives containing
the NSA’s keys to the kingdom.
At this point, of course, Snowden was not wanted by the authorities.
He had provided his employer and the NSA with a medical
excuse for his absence from work so he would not be immediately
missed. He had a valid passport, a credit card, and ID. Snowden’s destination
was Hong Kong. After crossing the international date line,
Snowden waited about three hours in the transit zone of Narita. He
then boarded a plane to Hong Kong. After the four- hour flight from
Narita, he arrived in Hong Kong early in the morning on May 20.
He had visited Hong Kong at least once before, with Lindsay
Mills, when he was stationed in Japan. According to Albert Ho, his
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 81
9/29/16 5:51 PM
82 | how america lost its secrets
Hong Kong lawyer, Snowden stayed at a residence arranged for him
in advance by a party whom Snowden knew prior to his arrival. As
noted earlier, for the next ten days, Snowden did not use his credit
card or leave any paper trail to his location. Wherever he was, “his
first priority,” as he later told Greenwald, was to find a place safe
from U.S. countermeasures. He brought with him a large number
of electronic copies of NSA documents marked TS/SCI/NOFORN,
which stood for “Top Secret, Sensitive Compartmented Information,
and No Foreign Distribution.” According to government rules,
data carrying these labels could not be removed from a governmentapproved
“SCI facility.” But Snowden, who brought them with him
into this semiautonomous zone in China, broke these rules.
Wherever Snowden was staying, apparently he believed he was
relatively safe. “That whole period was very carefully planned and
orchestrated,” Snowden later told The Guardian in Moscow. On
May 22, he sent an e-mail to Bay (who did not know he had left
Hawaii) saying that his epilepsy tests came back with “bad” results,
and he needed further medical attention. Here Snowden communicated
directly first with Gellman and then with Greenwald. He
e- mailed Gellman under the alias “Verax.”
Already, via Poitras, he had provided Gellman with PowerPoint
slides from an NSA presentation about a joint FBI- NSA- CIA
operation code- named PRISM. He believed it qualified as whistleblowing
because it revealed that the NSA, in intercepting e- mails,
tweets, postings, and other web interactions about foreign terrorists,
incidentally also picked up data about Americans. According to the
rules imposed on the NSA by a 2007 presidential directive, whatever
information was accidently picked up about Americans was supposed
to be filtered out, and hundreds of compliance officers were to
recheck the data every ninety days to assure that directive was being
carried out. Even so, it was likely some data was not expunged in this
process. So PRISM could cause embarrassment for the NSA.
Snowden had not yet made arrangements to meet journalists, but
now he proposed that Gellman join him in Hong Kong. In attempting
to convince him of the urgency of the trip, he wrote that he had reason
to believe that “omniscient State powers” imperiled “our freedom
and way of life.” He noted, with a touch of modesty, “Perhaps
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 82
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Escape Artist | 83
I am naive.” He also added dramatically, “I have risked my life and
family.” Even so, Gellman declined coming to Hong Kong. (According
to Greenwald, Gellman could not make the trip, because lawyers
for The Washington Post were uneasy with having a reporter receive
classified documents in a part of China.)
On May 24, 2013, Snowden attempted to apply more pressure on
Gellman by telling him that the story about the PRISM program
had to be published by the Post within seventy- two hours. Gellman
could not accede to such a condition, because the decision of when to
publish a story was made not by him but by the editors of the newspaper.
He told Snowden that the earliest the story could be published
was June 6, 2013, which was well past Snowden’s deadline.
Snowden next turned to Greenwald in Brazil. Both Poitras and
Micah Lee had made great efforts to tutor Greenwald on encryption
protocols, with Lee’s sending Greenwald a DVD by FedEx that would
allow him to receive both encrypted messages and encrypted phone
calls. Even then, Greenwald was unable to fully install it. As a result,
Greenwald still had not met Snowden’s requisites on encrypting his
computer.
With Gellman uncertain, Greenwald was now essential to Snowden’s
plan. If he was to have any newspaper outlet, he needed to
persuade Greenwald to come to Hong Kong. At this point, he took
matters into his own hands. On May 25, Snowden somewhat aggressively
e- mailed Greenwald, saying, “I’ve been working on a major
project with a mutual friend of ours. You recently had to decline
short- term travel to meet with me.” Although he did not specify the
“short- term travel” to which he referred, he added pointedly, “You
need to be involved in this story.” He suggested that they immediately
speak on the phone via a website that encrypts conversations.
Snowden began the call by complaining, “I don’t like how this
is developing.” He made it clear that he, not the journalist he had
selected, was pulling the strings. If Greenwald wanted the scoop, he
had to follow Snowden’s instructions, which included dividing the
scoops between The Guardian and The Washington Post. According
to his plan, Gellman would break the PRISM story in the Post, and
Greenwald would break the “mass domestic spying” story in The
Guardian. In addition, he insisted that The Guardian publish his per-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 83
9/29/16 5:51 PM
84 | how america lost its secrets
sonal manifesto alongside its story. As he envisioned it, the media
event would also include a video component in which Greenwald
would interview him.
Greenwald agreed to this micromanaging, So Snowden said he
would send him what he called a “welcome package” of documents
to demonstrate his good faith. His plan also required a face- to- face
meeting. Snowden told him, “The first order of business is to get you
to Hong Kong.” The whole conversation lasted two hours, according
to Greenwald.
Snowden sent him twenty classified NSA documents labeled “Top
Secret.” He also included in the package his personal manifesto,
which asserted that the NSA was part of an international conspiracy
of intelligence agencies that were working to “inflict upon the world
a system of secret, pervasive surveillance from which there is no
refuge.”
Meanwhile, Snowden told Poitras he was sending her a number of
NSA documents, including a FISA warrant that had been issued less
than a month earlier. He wanted that FISA warrant to serve as the
basis of Greenwald’s scoop. It was perfect whistle- blowing material
for The Guardian because it ordered Verizon to turn over all its billing
records for ninety days to the NSA. It was as close to a smoking
gun as anything he had copied at the NSA. It would also get attention
because James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, had
stated before Congress just two months earlier that the NSA did not
collect phone data in America. This warrant would allow The Guardian,
in the best tradition of gotcha journalism, to catch Clapper in an
apparent lie.
Continuing his string pulling, Snowden instructed Poitras not to
show the FISA warrant to Greenwald until they were safely aboard
a plane to Hong Kong. That would prevent Greenwald from releasing
the story previously. He also sent Poitras an entire encrypted
file of NSA documents, saying it would “include my true name and
details for the record, though it will be your decision as to whether
or how to declare my involvement.” He did not send her the key to
decipher the file, saying, “The key will follow when everything else
is done.” He further told her that he preferred that her new film
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 84
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Escape Artist | 85
focus on him as the sole perpetrator of the leak so that no one else at
the NSA would be suspected.
Poitras and Gellman were not the only journalists involved in
the news event. Poitras also asked Appelbaum to help her interview
Snowden about the NSA’s operations. She later said that she needed
someone with technical expertise in government surveillance to test
the bona fides of Citizen Four. She believed that Appelbaum, who
had participated in her anti- NSA presentations in 2012, qualified for
the position.
Snowden previously had contact with Appelbaum. Appelbaum
had communicated with Snowden under his Oahu CryptoParty alias
about an obscure piece of software just a few weeks after Snowden
had met with Runa Sandvik in Hawaii in December 2012. Appelbaum,
in fact, had worked with Sandvik as a core developer of Tor
software. Snowden allowed Appelbaum to put detailed questions to
him concerning the secret operations of the NSA before he met with
Poitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong. Indeed, Poitras joined him
in asking Snowden via encrypted e- mails such questions as “What
are some of the big surveillance programs that are active today
and how do international partners aid the NSA?” “Does the NSA
partner with other nations, like Israel?” and “Do private companies
help the NSA?” Snowden answered all the questions to the satisfaction
of Appelbaum and Poitras. (The interview was published on
July 8, 2013, with Snowden’s approval on the website of Der Spiegel,
the German weekly, which had also published the WikiLeaks
documents.)
As the days ticked away while Snowden was waiting for Greenwald
in Hong Kong, Greenwald was awaiting a green light to go
there from Janine Gibson, the editor of the Guardian website, who
was based in New York. Under Gibson’s leadership, The Guardian’s
website had effectively “gone into the business of publishing government
secrets,” as the Guardian columnist Michael Wolff pointed
out. Most of the documents had been supplied by Bradley Manning
via WikiLeaks. Few if any of these previous documents The
Guardian published were highly classified, and none were SCI top
secret documents. The NSA documents Greenwald had received
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 85
9/29/16 5:51 PM
86 | how america lost its secrets
from Citizen Four were another matter. They contained the sort of
SCI communications intelligence data that no major newspaper had
ever published before. Their disclosure might result in journalists’
being imprisoned, because both British law and U.S. law criminalized
the disclosure by anyone of communications intelligence. As a
lawyer, Greenwald recognized this danger. On the other hand, the
NSA documents were far more explosive than the WikiLeaks material
and promised an even greater spike in circulation. So Greenwald
assumed that Gibson would be willing to authorize their publication
and provide the expenses for his trip to Hong Kong.
He flew from Rio to New York on May 30 to meet in person
with Gibson, who had concerns about publishing what were purported
to be top secret documents that came from an anonymous
source. She was certainly not willing to go along with Citizen Four’s
demand that The Guardian publish his personal manifesto alongside
the documents. Aside from its shrill and alarming tone, it sounded,
as she told Greenwald, “a bit Ted Kaczynski- ish,” referring to the
mathematician known as the Unabomber who had maimed or killed
twenty- six people with anonymous mail bombs between 1978 and
1995. Kaczynski had also demanded that newspapers publish his
personal manifesto. Gibson explained to Greenwald, “It is going to
sound crazy to some people.” Her concern was that it would detract
from the credibility of the rest of the story. Snowden had also written
to Greenwald to explain his position. “Even the Constitution is
subverted when the appetites of power demand it,” Snowden said.
Paraphrasing President Thomas Jefferson, he continued, “Let us
speak no more of faith in man, but bind him down from mischief by
the chains of cryptography.” Snowden, showing his cultlike faith in
encryption, substituted “cryptography” for Jefferson’s word “constitution.”
Gibson was unmoved. The stolen NSA documents were
another matter. They were an enormous scoop that could have a
greater impact than the WikiLeaks scoop.
Gibson authorized Greenwald’s trip to Hong Kong on the condition
that he take with him a Guardian staffer in whom she had
confidence, the Scottish- born Ewen MacAskill, a sixty- one- year- old
veteran journalist who had been the Washington bureau chief for
The Guardian. His assignment was to evaluate the bona fides of the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 86
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Escape Artist | 87
anonymous source in Hong Kong for Gibson. Greenwald accepted
her terms. Poitras, who would be accompanying them, would be
paying her own way.
In case The Guardian failed to publish the story, Snowden had a
contingency plan in place. While Greenwald was negotiating with
Gibson, Snowden arranged for Micah Lee, Poitras’s associate at the
Freedom of the Press Foundation, to build a personal website for
him. Writing to Lee from Hong Kong, first under his alias Anon108
and later under his real name, Snowden said that he planned to post
his “anti- surveillance manifesto.” He would also use it to post “a
global petition against surveillance.” Snowden had Lee name the site
“SupportOnlineRights.com.” According to Lee, the website would
be built with a “dead man’s switch,” which would automatically
trigger the release of NSA documents if Snowden was arrested. It
was not clear whether Lee was doing this work as a freelancer or in
his capacity as the chief technology officer for the Freedom of the
Press Foundation. The website Lee built for Snowden proved unnecessary
when Poitras e- mailed him on June 1 that The Guardian had
approved the trip and she and Greenwald were booked on a Cathay
Pacific flight to Hong Kong. They would arrive the next day.
In his preparation to go public in Hong Kong, Snowden showed
himself fully capable of orchestrating what would become a major
news story. He not only picked the journalists who would break
it but also instructed each of them as to the timing, sequence, and
content of their initial disclosures. In the security of his unknown
residence in Hong Kong, he also worked to carefully separate the
purloined NSA documents into two very different caches. “I carefully
evaluated every single document I disclosed,” Snowden
explained to the Guardian journalists in early June. The documents
in this first cache were selected to serve what he termed the “public
interest.” In the hands of journalists, these selected documents,
and the story he fashioned to accompany them, would burnish his
image in the public consciousness as a whistle- blower. He did not
turn over the second cache, telling Greenwald, “There are all sorts
of documents that would have made a big impact that I didn’t turn
over.”
By the time he received the message from Poitras, Snowden had
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 87
9/29/16 5:51 PM
88 | how america lost its secrets
finished his preparations for the journalists. With selected documents
copied on a thumb drive, he moved from the residence where
he had been staying for ten days to a venue for meeting the reporters.
The place he chose, as noted earlier, was the Mira hotel in the
Kowloon district of Hong Kong, where he checked in under his own
name. He e- mailed Poitras his name and the address of the hotel;
there was no longer any reason to hide his true identity.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 88
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 10
Whistle- blower
They elected me. The overseers . . . The [American] system failed
comprehensively, and each level of oversight, each level of responsibility
that should have addressed this, abdicated their responsibility.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013
While snowden in Hong Kong was attempting to reel in
the journalists, Lindsay Mills returned to Honolulu from
her “island- hopping” trip to find their house partially flooded and
Snowden nowhere to be found. In a brief note Snowden left her, he
said he was away on a business trip and indicated that, at least temporarily,
their eight- year relationship was on hold.
“I feel alone, lost, overwhelmed, and desperate for a reprieve from
the bipolar nature of my current situation,” she wrote in her journal
on June 2 (which would be June 3 across the international timeline
in Hong Kong). “I’ve nearly lost my mind, family, and house over
the past few weeks.” She also noted in her online journal, “Oh and
I physically lost my memory [SIM] card with nearly all my adventure
photos,” as well as other personal data. The loss would make it
difficult to reconstruct her past activities with Snowden.
In Hong Kong, if Snowden were following Lindsay’s online journal,
he would have read that his girlfriend had returned home, lost
her data, and needed a “reprieve” from the situation in which he had
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 89
9/29/16 5:51 PM
90 | how america lost its secrets
put her. But because they were exchanging private text messages
by then, he would not have needed to consult her public journal.
Snowden was certainly aware that he would soon be the object of a
manhunt that could involve those with whom he was acquainted. He
instructed Poitras to mask their e- mail communications in cyberspace
“so we don’t have a clue or record of your true name in your
file communication chain.” Such precautions were necessary, he
explained to her, because “every trick in the book is likely to be used
in looking into this.” The journalists arrived the evening of June 2.
The Mira hotel can be entered by guests both through a groundfloor
lobby with a restaurant and a smaller third- floor lobby that
connects to the Mira shopping mall. The instructions that Snowden
sent Poitras on her arrival were an exercise in control: “On timing,
regarding meeting up in Hong Kong, the first rendezvous attempt
will be at 10 a.m. local time. We will meet in the hallway outside
of the restaurant in the Mira Hotel. I will be working on a Rubik’s
cube so that you can identify me. Approach me and ask if I know the
hours of the restaurant. I’ll respond by stating that I’m not sure and
suggest you try the lounge instead. I’ll offer to show you where it is,
and at that point we’re good. You simply need to follow naturally.”
According to Greenwald’s account, Snowden changed the plan to the
upper lobby. “We were to go to the third floor,” Greenwald writes.
“We were to wait on a couch near a ‘giant alligator,’ ” which Poitras
said was a room decoration. (A hotel executive told me that the hotel
knew of no plastic alligator on the third floor but possibly it had
been temporarily parked there by a hotel guest.) They were then
to give the recognition signal. Although these instructions provided
the atmospherics of “an international spy thriller,” as Greenwald
described them, Snowden hardly needed any spy tradecraft to recognize
Greenwald and Poitras because there were many photographs
of them on the Internet.
In any case, they gave the recognition signal, twice, in the designated
place, and a young man walked over to them holding
a Rubik’s Cube. Greenwald noted, “The first thing I saw was the
unsolved Rubik’s Cube, twirling in the man’s left hand.” The man
said, “Hello,” and introduced himself as “Ed Snowden.”
Greenwald was particularly surprised by Snowden’s boyish looks.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 90
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Whistle- blower | 91
“The initial impression was one of extreme confusion,” Greenwald
wrote in his book. “I was expecting to meet somebody in his sixties
or seventies, someone very senior in the agency, because I knew
almost nothing about him prior to our arrival in Hong Kong.” His
initial confusion was understandable. Snowden, it will be recalled,
had falsely identified himself to them in an e- mail as a senior member
of the intelligence community.
Snowden led Greenwald and Poitras to the nearby elevator, and
they went through various corridors of the hotel to his room on
the tenth floor. It was mainly occupied by a king- sized bed, but it
also featured a sleek writing desk in the corner, two chairs, and a
modernistic lamp. The bathroom was behind a glass partition, which
could be closed off by a black louver blind. There was also a small
refrigerator in which Snowden asked them to stow their cell phones.
Snowden, as we know, had already told Poitras that he wanted
her to make a documentary of the meeting. She therefore wasted
no time in mounting her camera on a tripod. “Minutes after meeting,
I set up the camera,” she said. Snowden told her, “When you
are involved in an action which is likely to get you indicted, you
typically don’t have a camera rolling in the room.” Nevertheless,
he allowed her to film his actions for the next eight days. One possible
reason is that he had no intention of standing trial. In any case,
as Poitras found out, Snowden was anything but camera shy. Over
the next week, she would shoot over twenty hours of Snowden’s
activities in that small room. It was essentially a one- man show, a
presentation of him, by himself, for the appreciation of a global public.
Poitras knew virtually nothing about her subject until ten minutes
before she began filming him. She had not even googled him,
because she was concerned that her Internet search might alert the
NSA and law enforcement authorities. In an over- the- top waiver of
his own privacy, he allowed her to film him washing in the bathroom,
preening his hair in the mirror, napping on his bed, getting
dressed, and packing his bag. He even permitted her to film a private
computer exchange between him and Mills (who was in Honolulu).
That day Mills informed Snowden that two government investigators
had come to their home in Hawaii, asking her about Snowden’s
whereabouts. When he had failed to show up for work on June 3 it
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 91
9/29/16 5:51 PM
92 | how america lost its secrets
evidently set off alarm bells at Booz Allen and the NSA. Snowden
expressed anger to the journalists in the room at the NSA’s intrusions
on the privacy of his girlfriend.
Snowden also performed his security procedures on camera,
including stuffing bed pillows under the door to block any eavesdroppers
and throwing a red blanket over his head, which he called
jokingly his “magical cloak of power.” He explained to Greenwald
that he donned his “cloak” when he turned on his laptop to prevent
any hidden cameras in the room from spotting his password. He also
checked the hotel phone for bugs. It was not without irony that he
went through these security rituals to protect his data as he allowed
Poitras to film NSA data on his computer screen. Because he planned
to use these journalists as his outlets to go public in a few days, the
security measures he performed while on camera would only serve
a temporary purpose.
The centerpiece of the planned video would take the form of an
interview with Greenwald. Snowden himself provided the talking
points. The filming would eventually provide Poitras with a featurelength
documentary, Citizenfour, which would be commercially
released in October 2014 and win an Academy Award for her.
The next day, Ewen MacAskill, whom Poitras had not wanted
Greenwald to bring to the initial meeting, joined Poitras and Greenwald
in Snowden’s room. Snowden insisted that MacAskill also go
through the ritual of stowing his cell phone in the minibar refrigerator.
Not without irony, Snowden’s own phone can be seen on his bed
recharging. Although MacAskill was sent by Gibson to the event to
verify the source’s bona fides, he had apparently hardly been briefed.
The questioning went as follows:
macaskill: Sorry, I don’t know anything about you.
snowden: OK, I work for—
macaskill: Sorry, I don’t know even your name.
snowden: Oh, sorry, my name is Edward Snowden. I go by Ed.
MacAskill went on to ask him to enumerate the various positions
he held during his career in intelligence. Snowden was not entirely
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 92
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Whistle- blower | 93
truthful in describing himself. He said that he had been a senior
adviser to the CIA, when he had been just a telecommunications support
officer. He also said he had been a senior adviser at the Defense
Intelligence Agency, even though, according to that intelligence
service, he was never employed there. (He did speak at an interagency
counterintelligence course the DIA had sponsored.) He said
he had a $200,000- a- year salary from Booz Allen when, according
to Booz Allen, it was $133,000. It is understandable that he wanted
to impress these Guardian journalists in light of his young age and
boyish appearance, even to the extent of meretriciously claiming
in the video that he had been personally given the “authority” at
the NSA to intercept President Obama’s private communications,
which, according to an NSA spokeswoman, was not true. No NSA
employee, and certainly no civilian contract worker, was given the
authority to spy on the president of the United States, she insisted.
Such career enhancements reinforced the fact that Snowden altered
reality when it suited his purpose with journalists.
Snowden had greatly exaggerated or misrepresented the positions
he held with the CIA and the DIA, but no effort was made by
the team of journalists to verify the information. Instead, MacAskill
wrote to Janine Gibson in New York, “The Guinness is good.” It was
a prearranged code by which MacAskill certified Snowden’s credibility
for The Guardian. Gibson told Greenwald to proceed with the
story. Snowden had already provided Poitras and Greenwald with
thumb drives on which he had loaded the documents he wanted
them to use.
Greenwald wrote his first story about NSA transgressions based
almost entirely on the FISA warrant involving Verizon’s cooperation
that Snowden had copied from the administrative file. Before
the story could be published, however, the Guardian policy required
relevant American government officials be given the opportunity to
respond. Gibson made the requisite call to the White House national
security spokesperson, Caitlin Hayden, who arranged a conference
call with the FBI’s deputy director, Sean Joyce, the NSA’s deputy
director, Chris Inglis, and Robert Litt, the legal officer for the Office of
the Director of National Intelligence. After duly taking into account
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 93
9/29/16 5:51 PM
94 | how america lost its secrets
the response of these three officials, which included the admonition
by Litt that “no serious news organization would publish this,” Gibson
gave the green light to publish the story.
The story broke on June 6. “NSA Collecting Phone Records of
Millions of Verizon Customers Daily,” proclaimed the Guardian
headline. Under Greenwald’s byline, it said, “Exclusive: Top secret
court order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scale
of domestic surveillance under Obama.” Along with it was the FISA
order. The PRISM story broke hours later in The Washington Post.
Written by Gellman and Poitras, it claimed that the NSA and the
FBI were tapping directly into the central servers of nine leading
U.S. Internet companies, which were knowingly participating in the
operation. The latter allegation turned out to be not entirely true,
because some of the Internet companies cited in the story denied
that they had knowingly participated. The back- to- back publication
of these two stories by The Guardian and the Post, however, provided
the explosive “shock,” at least in the global media, that Snowden had
predicted.
Snowden’s identity had not been revealed in either the Guardian
or the Post story on June 6. Snowden, however, insisted on outing
himself. He explained to Greenwald that he needed to “define himself”
before the U.S. government “demonized” him as a spy. That
self- definition would be accomplished by a twelve- minute video
titled “Whistleblower.” Poitras extracted much of the material for
the video from the twenty or so hours she had shot. In the filmed
interview, Snowden voiced many of the same statements he had
made in his manifesto, so he no longer needed to post that on the
Internet. When he insisted on the immediate airing of the video,
Greenwald told him that by going public in this way, he was saying
“fuck you” to the American government. Snowden replied, “I want
to identify myself as the person behind these disclosures.”
On June 9, the video was posted on the Guardian website with the
Freedom of the Press Foundation getting an on- screen credit. “My
name is Ed Snowden,” the extraordinary disclosure began. He then
described how the NSA was watching U.S. citizens. Even though the
NSA press spokesperson subsequently disputed some of his more
dramatic claims, such as his assertion that he had the authority at
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 94
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Whistle- blower | 95
the NSA “to wiretap anyone, even the president,” the press largely
accepted his claims as established facts. As for American surveillance,
he declared, “I don’t want to live in a society that does those sorts of
things.”
The Guardian story accompanying the video carried the headline
“Edward Snowden: The Whistleblower Behind the NSA Surveillance
Revelations.” Overnight, Snowden became a global celebrity
and, to much of the world, a hero.
The next morning he packed his belongings into a backpack and
moved, without notifying the front desk, to another room Poitras
had rented at the Mira. Complicated schemes, especially when they
involve transferring state secrets to unauthorized parties in a foreign
country, do not necessarily go as planned. That was true of
Snowden’s escape plan. Snowden had no plan to stay put and face
the music. On the morning of June 10, though, there was apparently
a problem. Robert Tibbo and Jonathan Man, the lawyers who, along
with Albert Ho, had been retained for Snowden by an unidentified
party, received an emergency phone call early in the morning telling
them to help Snowden move to a safe location. Although Tibbo
would not identify the person who had called, the message had been
relayed to Man and him through Ho’s office. When Tibbo called
Snowden offering to help him move, Snowden told him, “I can make
myself unrecognizable.”
Tibbo and Man immediately proceeded to the mall adjacent to
the Mira hotel, where they met Snowden. After he signed a document
appointing Ho’s law firm as his “legal adviser,” the three of
them slipped out via the mall exit. Tibbo and Man planned to move
Snowden to the apartments of refugees who were their clients.
Snowden’s credit card had been frozen, so it is not clear who
paid his sizable hotel bill. According to hotel records, it was paid
by another credit card. Poitras, who had taken a room at the hotel,
might have used her own credit card, or Snowden might have had
another benefactor in Hong Kong. In any case, the lawyers escorted
Snowden to a prearranged residence.
“I am in a safe house for now,” Snowden wrote to Greenwald on
June 11. The situation might not have been totally under his control,
because he added, “But I have no idea how safe it is.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 95
9/29/16 5:51 PM
96 | how america lost its secrets
Greenwald flew back to Brazil that day. Soon afterward, he would
resign from The Guardian. In February 2014, he became the cofounding
editor of The Intercept, an online publication dedicated to
investigative journalism, which was backed by the Internet billionaire
Pierre Omidyar.
Poitras remained in Hong Kong, where she moved, along with the
Guardian reporter MacAskill, to the five- star Sheraton Hong Kong
Hotel & Towers, which, like the Mira hotel, was on Nathan Road in
Kowloon. The Guardian paid the bill. Her next task was to set up
what turned out to be Snowden’s final interview in Hong Kong. It
was scheduled for June 12.
The journalist chosen was Lana Lam, a young Australian reporter
working for the South China Morning Post. Tibbo had suggested
Lam to Snowden. She had served as Tibbo’s outlet on previous news
stories, and, as he told me, he found her to be a totally reliable journalist.
He brought her to Poitras’s suite at the Sheraton in Kowloon.
First, Lam had to agree to the conditions of the interview, which
included submitting the story to Poitras for Snowden’s approval.
Next, as Lam put it, Poitras “confiscated” her cell phone. Finally,
after a ten- minute wait, Poitras took her to another room and sat
her before a black laptop. The laptop, which had a Tor sticker on it,
had on its screen an online chat room where she was connected by
Poitras to Snowden.
“Hi Lana, thanks for coming for this,” Snowden said from his safe
house. He told her that the NSA had intercepted data from at least
sixty- one thousand different computers in Hong Kong, China, and
elsewhere. To expose what he called America’s “hypocrisy” in accusing
China of cyber espionage, he supplied her with relevant NSA
documents. “Last week the American government happily operated
in the shadows with no respect for the consent of the governed, but
no longer,” he said. “The United States government has committed a
tremendous number of crimes against Hong Kong [and] the People’s
Republic of China as well.” Under Poitras’s close supervision, Lam
was allowed to ask Snowden more questions about the NSA’s interception
of communications in Hong Kong and China. He told her, “I
have had many opportunities to flee Hong Kong, but I would rather
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 96
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Whistle- blower | 97
stay and fight the United States government in the courts.” That bit
of braggadocio would not be proven out.
Greenwald, Poitras, and MacAskill in their reporting did not
concern themselves with any of the mechanics of the largest theft
of top secret documents in the history of the United States. In the
entire filmed interview at the Mira hotel, for example, they did not
ask their source how he managed to get access to the documents.
Lam, however, asked him about how he widened his access. When
she asked him why he had switched jobs from Dell to Booz Allen
Hamilton in March 2013, his answer provided her with a real scoop:
“My position with Booz Allen Hamilton granted me access to lists
of machines all over the world the NSA hacked.” Snowden told her
that he deliberately went to Booz Allen Hamilton to get access to
the “lists” revealing the NSA’s sources in foreign countries. This
admission could further complicate his legal situation in Hong Kong
because it suggested that he meant to steal documents even before
he had known their content. In fact, to protect himself, he restricted
Lam from publishing this part of the interview until after he had
departed Hong Kong. (It was not published until June 24, a day after
he arrived in Russia.) This condition indicated to Lam that as early
as June 12, if not before, he was planning on leaving Hong Kong.
His interview with Lam didn’t reveal how he had learned about
these “lists” before taking the job. Nor did he reveal to her what he
planned to do with these lists. He made it clear to her, however, that
he had not disposed of all his secret documents. “If I have time to go
through this information,” he said, “I would like to make it available
to journalists in each country to make their own assessment,
independent of my bias, as to whether or not the knowledge of US
network operations against their people should be published.” So as
late as June 12, Snowden was still reading and assessing the files he
had stolen from the NSA four weeks earlier.
Poitras vetted the Lam interview. Soon afterward, she suspected
that she was being followed. That was likely, because by June 14 all
the intelligence services in Hong Kong knew that she was in contact
with Snowden.
“I was being tailed,” Poitras recalled in an interview with a Vogue
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 97
9/29/16 5:51 PM
98 | how america lost its secrets
reporter in Berlin in 2014. “The risks became very great,” she said in
describing her situation in Hong Kong. So, on June 15, she left Hong
Kong and flew back to Berlin, where she began editing her footage
of the Snowden interview.
Meanwhile, Snowden, organizing his own exit from Hong Kong,
placed a call to Julian Assange.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 98
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 11
Enter Assange
Thanks to Russia (and thanks to WikiLeaks), Snowden remains
free.
— julian assange, Newsweek, 2015
Julian assange had made a brilliant career of trafficking in
state, military, and corporate secrets. Born on July 3, 1971, in
Queensland, Australia, Assange began his hacking career while still
a teenager. Using the alias Mendax (“the untruthful one”), he had
hacked into the computers of the Pentagon, the U.S. Navy, NASA,
Citibank, Lockheed Martin, and Australia’s Overseas Telecommunications
Commission before he was twenty. At the age of twenty- five,
he pleaded guilty to twenty- five charges of hacking in Australia but
was released on a good behavior bond. In 2006, with the spread of
Tor software, he co- founded WikiLeaks, a website in which secret
documents could be anonymously sent and posted. The site received
little public attention until Bradley Manning sent it several hundred
thousand lowly classified U.S. military and State Department
documents in April 2010. With these stolen documents, WikiLeaks
became a media sensation, and Assange, the runner- up for Time’s
Man of the Year for 2010, became a leading figure, along with Appelbaum,
in the global hacktivist underground.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 99
9/29/16 5:51 PM
100 | how america lost its secrets
In November 2010, however, he ran into a legal problem in
Sweden. A judge in Stockholm ordered his detention on suspicion
of rape, sexual molestation, and unlawful coercion. He denied the
charges but was arrested in London on a European arrest warrant. In
December, he was released on a $312,700 bail deposit (supplied by
his supporters) and confined to Ellingham Hall in Norfolk, England.
While awaiting the outcome of the extradition proceedings, he lived
there with Sarah Harrison, his twenty- eight- year- old deputy at
WikiLeaks. A graduate of the elite Sevenoaks School in Kent, Harrison
served as Assange’s liaison with the outside world. Although she
was officially given the title “investigative editor” of WikiLeaks, she
worked so closely with Assange during this period that the British
press carried stories saying she was his paramour. Harrison worked
on a WikiLeaks documentary titled Mediastan, which concerned
WikiLeaks’s exposure of U.S. secret operations in Russia and other
parts of the former Soviet Union. It was a project that took her to
Russia and provided her with a multi- entry Russian visa.
In June 2012, after the extradition order was upheld, Assange
jumped bail and fled to the Ecuador embassy in London. For the next
year, his only visible means of income was a weekly program from
the embassy. It was sponsored in 2012 by RT television, a Moscowbased,
English- language news channel funded by the Russian government,
which would also finance and release Mediastan. This
sponsorship suggests that the Russian government saw potential
value in the document- gathering activities of WikiLeaks.
Snowden telephoned Assange at his refuge at the Ecuador
embassy on June 10, 2013. According to Assange, Snowden needed
help for his exit plan. He wanted Assange to use WikiLeaks’s
“resources” to get him out of Hong Kong. Assange considered it a
surprising request, because Snowden had not given any of the stolen
documents to WikiLeaks. In their discussion, according to Assange,
Snowden claimed that one reason he decided to take the secret NSA
documents was the brutal treatment of Bradley Manning after he
was arrested in 2010 by the U.S. government. “Snowden told me
they had abused Manning in a way that contributed to his decision
to become a whistle- blower,” Assange said in an interview in 2015.
If Manning’s mistreatment was Snowden’s motive, it was a sharp
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 100
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Enter Assange | 101
departure from the position Snowden had taken in his postings on
the Ars Technica site in January 2009. He complained in a post there
about the detrimental consequences to U.S. intelligence of leakers’
revealing “classified shit” to The New York Times, and he suggested
as punishment “those people should be shot in the balls.” Either he
had a change of heart, or he was telling Assange what he believed he
wanted to hear.
Assange counseled Snowden to go directly to Russia. “My advice
was that he should take asylum in Russia despite the negative PR
consequences,” he told the London Times in 2015. He said, “Snowden
was well aware of the spin that would be put on it if he took asylum
in Russia.” So a story would be released presumably by WikiLeaks,
coinciding with his departure, asserting that Snowden was “bound
for the republic of Ecuador via a safe route.” When Snowden asked
how he would carry out the plan, Assange told him that he would
immediately dispatch one of his senior staff members to help him
engineer his escape to Russia. That senior staff member was Sarah
Harrison.
After speaking to Snowden, Assange called Harrison, who was in
Melbourne. She had gone there a month earlier to help organize
Assange’s somewhat quixotic election campaign for president of
Australia. Assange told her to forget the campaign and go to Hong
Kong. She was to use WikiLeaks’s resources to save Snowden from “a
lifetime in prison.” Presumably, Assange told her that he had advised
Snowden to proceed to Russia. Harrison later said that she didn’t
even bother to pack her clothing after hearing from Assange. She
caught the next plane to Hong Kong and arrived there on June 11—
the same day that Snowden texted Greenwald he was in a safe house
and before Snowden’s explosive interview with Lam. Harrison had
her own connections in Hong Kong. Her two younger sisters, Kate
and Alexandra, lived there and were part of the expatriate community.
She also had an older brother, Simon, who headed Avra, a ship
brokerage and commodity trading company, headquartered in Singapore,
but he frequently traveled to Hong Kong on business.
Like Poitras, Sarah Harrison took great care to shield her movements.
She did not have a Twitter, Facebook, or any other social media
account. She did not own a cell phone for fear of being tracked by an
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 101
9/29/16 5:51 PM
102 | how america lost its secrets
intelligence service. When she traveled, she bought “burner” phones
locally and disposed of them before any calls could be traced back to
her. Upon arriving in Hong Kong, she avoided meeting Snowden
face- to- face out of concern about the surveillance of American intelligence
there. Instead, for thirteen days in Hong Kong she worked
through intermediaries. Her task was not only to arrange Snowden’s
escape route but also to create diversions to camouflage his real destination.
Under Assange’s tutelage, she had made deceptive ploys an
integral part of her tradecraft. “We were working very hard to lay as
many false trails as possible,” she later told an interviewer in Berlin.
According to Assange, she booked decoy flights for Snowden to
Beijing and New Delhi. She also used Snowden’s credit card number
to pay for the flight to India; because the card was blocked, she knew
there was a high probability that it would come to the attention of
U.S. intelligence. According to Harrison, she booked no fewer than
a dozen such decoy tickets to confuse Snowden’s possible pursuers
in U.S. intelligence. The only actual ticket she bought for Snowden,
according to an Aeroflot official, was one to Moscow at the last minute.
She bought a ticket for herself on the same flight, leaving on
June 23.
The source of the money for the Assange- Harrison operation is
unclear. Subsequently, Harrison said she was setting up secret bank
accounts to help organize such transborder escapes. Assange said she
was using “WikiLeaks’s resources.” Harrison said the “WikiLeaks
team” helped fund Snowden’s flight to Russia from Hong Kong, as
well as her own flight there. But WikiLeaks was not an organization
with spare cash in June 2013. Assange had forfeited his own bail by
fleeing to the embassy of Ecuador, offending many of his financial
supporters in Britain. He had also all but exhausted his bank account.
Aside from money that dribbled in from Poitras’s six- month- old
Freedom of the Press Foundation, the only steady source of funds
for WikiLeaks in 2013 was the previously mentioned payments
Assange received from the Russian government’s RT television.
Mounting pressure was brought on the Hong Kong government
to take action against Snowden. On June 16, the U.S. government
informed the Hong Kong authorities that it had filed a criminal
complaint against Snowden and would be seeking his extradition.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 102
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Enter Assange | 103
Because Hong Kong had a vigorously enforced extradition agreement
with the United States, as mentioned above, it was expected
that Snowden would be taken into custody. But China had the final
say in any extradition decision. In fact, China had explicitly been
given the right of vetoing any extraditions for any reason in the
formal 1999 agreement between Hong Kong and the United States.
Because the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, had just met with President
Obama in California, China also had an interest in avoiding
embarrassing public demonstrations on behalf of Snowden. According
to a well- placed official in Hong Kong, China’s liaison office in
Hong Kong told the Hong Kong Authority in no uncertain terms
that Snowden had to be out of Hong Kong by June 23.
On June 19, Snowden had a meeting with Tibbo, the barrister who
would handle any eventual court case, and Man and Ho, the Hong
Kong solicitors who had been retained for him. It took place in a
small apartment where, according to Ho, they ate pizza while they
discussed Snowden’s options.
Tibbo wanted Snowden to remain in Hong Kong, allow himself
to be arrested, seek bail, and fight extradition in court. Tibbo said
he planned to mount a powerful legal defense against extradition
by using a provision in Hong Kong’s extradition treaty with the
United States that protects fugitives from persecution on political
grounds. After he told Snowden that it would entail a long court
battle, Snowden asked him if he could avoid even being arrested.
Tibbo explained that Hong Kong courts, which closely follow
British law, would certainly issue an arrest warrant for him immediately
after the United States formally filed charges against him.
Those charges could come within hours, he reckoned. Soon afterward,
Snowden would be temporarily jailed, and his computers,
electronic gear, and thumb drives would be seized and placed in the
custody of the court. Tibbo would immediately seek his release on
bail but could not guarantee an outcome because Snowden, who
had fled U.S. jurisdiction, might be considered a flight risk. If so,
Snowden could remain incarcerated during the long court battle.
During the litigation, Snowden would have a platform to make
his case against U.S. surveillance. Indeed, Tibbo’s strategy involved
building massive public support for Snowden’s cause. Once the U.S.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 103
9/29/16 5:51 PM
104 | how america lost its secrets
government filed charges, though, Snowden could further expect it
would invalidate his passport to go anywhere except for his return to
the United States, and Interpol would issue a red alert to all its members.
Because his case involved national security secrets, he had also
to consider that the Hong Kong court could deny him any use of the
Internet until his extradition case was settled. If Snowden wanted to
leave Hong Kong, he had to act swiftly.
Tibbo, although evasive on the point when I interviewed him,
might not have known about the escape Harrison was planning. He
did not know that Snowden’s other alternatives were not good. He
had no money, and his credit card had been blocked. He had no visas
to go to any other country, and Interpol would issue its own border
alert as soon as the United States filed its charges. At that point,
Hong Kong airport authorities would be officially notified and could
prevent him from leaving the city. Even if he somehow got out, he
would be an international fugitive. Tibbo counseled Snowden to seek
redress in the Hong Kong courts.
Snowden, though, had no intention of allowing himself to be
arrested. Despite what he had told Lana Lam only one week earlier,
at least for publication, about his determination to seek justice in
the Hong Kong courts, he had not planned to use Hong Kong as
anything more than a temporary stopover on his escape route. Two
months later and safely in Moscow, he made this point clear in a
lengthy interview with Alan Rusbridger, the editor of The Guardian.
He told him that it had never been part of his plan to use Hong
Kong to escape the legal consequences of his act. “The purpose of my
mission [to Hong Kong] was to get the information to journalists.”
If so, he had merely been using Tibbo, Man, and Ho to provide him
with temporary cover while, following the instructions of Assange,
Harrison laid down the smoke screen for his escape to Moscow.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 104
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 12
Fugitive
If I end up in chains in Guantánamo, I can live with that.
— edward snowden, Hong Kong, 2013
During his interviews with Poitras and Greenwald in June,
Snowden said stoically, “If I am arrested, I am arrested.” His
fatalistic words notwithstanding, Snowden had made plans to seek
a haven from American justice well before his meeting them. As
early as May 24, 2013, he had suggested to Barton Gellman that
he was making arrangements with a foreign government. To that
end, he asked Gellman to insert an encrypted key in the Internet
version of the NSA exposé that Snowden proposed he write for The
Washington Post. He told him the purpose of the encrypted key was
to assist him with a foreign government. Snowden did not identify
any foreign government to Gellman, but Gellman said he knew
that Snowden wanted to “seek asylum” overseas. He decided against
assisting him. “I can’t help him evade U.S. jurisdiction— I don’t want
to, and I can’t,” he later explained. “It’s not my job. It’s not the relationship.
I am a journalist.”
Although Gellman suspected that Iceland might be the foreign
government in question, Snowden, as it turned out, had never con-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 105
9/29/16 5:51 PM
106 | how america lost its secrets
tacted the consulate of Iceland while he was in Hong Kong. “We had
heard nothing from Snowden,” an Iceland government official told
Vanity Fair.
Snowden also did not contact the government of Ecuador while
in Hong Kong. In mid- June, while Harrison was laying down false
tracks for Snowden in Hong Kong, Assange in London asked Fidel
Narváez, who was a friend of his and the legal attaché in the London
embassy of Ecuador, to issue a document that Snowden could
use. But this document was not delivered to Snowden in Hong Kong
(and it was later invalidated by Ecuador). There are no direct flights
to Ecuador from Hong Kong. If Snowden had really planned to go to
Ecuador without stopping in a country allied with the United States,
he would have had to fly to Cuba. He would need a Cuban travel
document to do that, which he could have obtained from the Cuban
consulate anytime during his month in Hong Kong. But he did not
obtain it. Nor did he acquire a visa to go to any other country in
Latin America or elsewhere while in Hong Kong. So where was he
headed?
Whatever foreign government with which Snowden was dealing
earlier presumably did not have an extradition treaty with the
United States. Almost all other countries that did not have active
extradition treaties with the United States could not be directly
reached by air. With three notable exceptions, the flights to most of
these countries had stopovers in a country that was an ally of the
United States, where officials could seize Snowden. The three exceptions
were China, North Korea (via China), and Russia.
The only one of these three countries that Snowden is known
to have had contact with directly during his thirty- three- day stay
in Hong Kong was Russia. The Russian president, Vladimir Putin,
revealed these contacts in a televised press briefing in September
2013. Putin did not provide the date of these contacts, but he provided
an intriguing clue. Snowden was identified to him, according
to Putin, not by name but merely as an “agent of special services.”
If his name was not given to Putin, it might have been because
Snowden’s first meeting with the Russians had taken place before
Snowden became a household name on June 9, 2013.
For his part, Snowden was evasive when discussing his con-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 106
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Fugitive | 107
tacts with Russia while still in Hong Kong. When Lana Lam asked
Snowden on June 12, 2013, whether he had already requested asylum
from the Russian government, he deferred, saying, “My only
comment is that I am glad there are governments that refuse to be
intimidated by great power.” The Russian government was clearly
not intimidated by the threats of reprisals by the United States, as
the Obama administration would learn after Snowden’s arrival in
Russia on June 23. Snowden could only have known that with certainty
on June 12 if he had been in contact with Russian officials
prior to his interview with Lam.
If Putin’s own description of Snowden’s interactions with the
Russians in Hong Kong is to be believed, the decision to facilitate
Snowden’s escape to Russia had been kicked all the way up the Russian
chain of command to Putin. Presumably, this decision- making
process began earlier than June 21, when Snowden was said to have
gone to the consulate. But how much earlier? Because Snowden had
arrived in Hong Kong on May 20, his contacts with Russian officials
could have occurred in May. Such a contact with the Russians
would fit with Snowden’s telling Gellman on May 24 that he needed
his help in dealing with the diplomatic mission of a country that
Snowden did not identify.
In any case, Putin said an American “agent of the special services”
had contacted Russian diplomats because he wanted assistance. The
agent, Snowden, of course, needed assistance to escape from Hong
Kong. The decision to accept him in Russia, given the international
ramifications, would have to be made at a much higher level than the
Russian mission in Hong Kong.
Nine days before Snowden boarded Aeroflot Flight SU213 to
Moscow on June 23, the United States had filed a criminal complaint
against him. It had also officially alerted Interpol when it unsealed
the complaint on June 21. It had invalidated his U.S. passport except
to return to America (although he still had it in his possession at
the Hong Kong airport). Because by this time he was the most
famous visitor in Hong Kong, his passage through passport control
on June 23 might have reflected the acquiescence of the Hong Kong
authorities to the reported request of China to be rid of Snowden by
that date.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 107
9/29/16 5:51 PM
108 | how america lost its secrets
According to one Aeroflot official, ordinarily all international passengers
are required to have a valid passport as well as a visa to the
country of final destination. Snowden had neither a valid passport
nor a visa. Still Snowden was able to board the flight to Moscow.
Aeroflot, a state- controlled airline, presumably responds to the Russian
government on matters where Putin has given his approval.
Snowden first met Harrison in person on June 23. She was waiting
for him in the car that Jonathan Man had arranged to take him
to the airport that morning. Snowden was dressed in a gray shirt
and khaki slacks. Harrison was dressed in jeans and flip- flops. She
said she had chosen this dress style so that they would blend in at
the airport with vacationing tourists. She had financed the trip, and
she was apparently now calling the shots. Harrison’s concern was
that they might be arrested at the airport, so Man accompanied them
through passport control. He was able to do this because he bought
a ticket on the cheapest available international flight. Harrison had
given Man a phone number to call if they got arrested. When she
and Snowden boarded the flight at 12:45 p.m., Harrison effectively
became Snowden’s second “carer”— a job that would require her
presence in Moscow for the next four months.
Snowden had pretty much remained silent until the plane took
off. The first full proper sentence she heard from him as they headed
for Moscow, as she recalled, was “I didn’t expect that WikiLeaks was
going to send a ninja to get me out.”
Meanwhile, Assange continued creating “distractions,” as he put
it. On June 24, a booking was made for Snowden on an Aeroflot
flight to Cuba, and this information was relayed to the foreign press
organization in Moscow, resulting in over a dozen reporters flying
to Havana on the flight. Snowden, of course, never showed up for it.
“In some of our communications, we deliberately spoke about that
[flight] on open lines to lawyers in the United States,” Assange said.
One subsequent piece of his misinformation was that Snowden was
flying to Bolivia on the private plane of the Bolivian president, Evo
Morales (who was then in Moscow for a meeting). That misinformation
had the desired effect. U.S. allies in Europe, including France,
Spain, and Portugal, refused to allow that plane to fly through its
airspace, forcing the plane to land in Austria. This misinformation
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 108
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Fugitive | 109
resulted in an international incident but did not change the fact that
Snowden was still in the custody of Russian authorities.
Snowden came to realize that those assisting him, including
Assange and Harrison, were taking serious risks. “Anyone in a threemile
radius [of me] is going to get hammered,” he later said in 2015
to a reporter from Vogue. (After finally leaving Snowden in Moscow
on November 3, 2013, Harrison moved to Berlin, where she set up
an organization to provide, as she termed it, “an underground railroad”
for other fugitives who had made available documents exposing
government secrets.)
Snowden was sequestered in the transit zone of the Moscow airport
for thirty- seven days. A Russian intermediary provided him
with a Russian classic to read while awaiting asylum. It was Fyodor
Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, whose protagonist, Rodion
Romanovich Raskolnikov, is a dissenter who believes breaking the
law is morally justified by the unfair abuses of the political system.
Snowden received official sanctuary in Russia on August 1, 2013.
His public statements in Hong Kong that he was willing to go to
prison so that others could live freely in a democratic society were,
as it turned out, mere rhetoric. Instead of risking prison, he had successfully
escaped to a country in which he would be treated as a hero
for defying the U.S. government. He had not sacrificed himself; he
had transformed himself. He had risen from being a lowly technician
in Hawaii whose talents went largely unrecognized to the status
of an international media star in Moscow. In his new role, he could
make Internet appearances via Skype to prestigious gatherings, such
as the TED conference, where he would be roundly applauded as an
Internet hero, as well as be paid a $20,000 fee for just his electronic
participation. He would be beamed into dozens of ACLU meetings
where he was celebrated as a defender of American liberty. He would
describe to sympathetic audiences in Germany, Norway, and France
the unfairness of the American legal system, asserting that it was
denying him a “fair trial.” He would now make front- page news
by granting interviews to The New York Times, The Washington
Post, The Nation, and other publications. He would join Poitras and
Greenwald on the board of directors of the Freedom of the Press
Foundation. He would be the subject of an Oscar- winning documen-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 109
9/29/16 5:51 PM
110 | how america lost its secrets
tary, the hero of the 2016 Hollywood movie Snowden (directed by
Oliver Stone), and a consultant to the 2015 season of the television
series Homeland. He would be nominated for the Nobel Peace
Prize in 2014. He would attract over one million followers to his
tweets in 2015. “For me, in terms of personal satisfaction, the mission’s
already accomplished. I already won,” he informed the Post
in his first live interview in Moscow in December 2013. It was a
mission that involved a very high- stakes enterprise: taking not only
domestic surveillance documents but America’s military and foreign
intelligence secrets abroad.
Whistle- blowers do not ordinarily steal military secrets. Nor do
they flee to the territory of America’s principal adversaries. A fugitive,
especially one lacking a Russian visa, does not wind up in Moscow
by pure accident. It’s hard to imagine that a Russian president
with the KGB background of Putin would give his personal sanction
for a high- profile exfiltration from Hong Kong without weighing
the gain that might proceed from it. Whatever else may be said of
Putin, his actions show him to be a calculating opportunist. Part of
his calculus would be that the defector from American intelligence
had taken possession of a great number of potentially valuable documents
from the inner sanctum of the NSA and, aside from these
documents, claimed to hold secrets of great importance in his head.
To be sure, the practical value of this stolen archive would require
a lengthy evaluation by Russia’s other intelligence services. But it
is hard to believe that a defector who put himself in the hands of
the FSB, the successor to the KGB, and other Russian intelligence
services wouldn’t be expected to cooperate with them. Even if such
a defector did not carry these files with him to Moscow, intelligence
services have the means to recover digital files, even after they are
erased from a computer or if they are sent to the cloud. Moreover,
once secret documents are taken, they are compromised. Yet for
much of the American public, Snowden remained a hero.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 110
9/29/16 5:51 PM
part two
THE INTELLIGENCE CRISIS
What you’ve seen so far [in the Snowden theft of documents]
is just the tip of the iceberg.
—retired admiral michael mcconnell,
vice- chairman, Booz Allen Hamilton, 2013
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 111
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 112
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 13
The Great Divide
That moral decision to tell the public about spying that affects all
of us has been costly, but it was the right thing to do and I have
no regrets.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013
In the twelve- minute video on The Guardian’s website,
Snowden correctly identified himself as an infrastructure analyst
at a regional base of the National Security Agency in Oahu, Hawaii.
He also revealed in a calm, unemotional voice that he had been the
source for the stories in both The Guardian and The Washington
Post. He said that he had supplied the secret, classified documents
that the two newspapers had used in their scoops about domestic
surveillance being conducted by the NSA, America’s enormous electronic
surveillance agency. These sensational revelations had been,
literally, the talk of the world, and now, in another major news event,
the boyish- looking Snowden took responsibility for what would
turn out to be the largest theft of top secret documents in the history
of U.S. intelligence.
In the video, it will be recalled, Glenn Greenwald, who had broken
the NSA story in The Guardian, questioned Snowden. What
was his motive? Greenwald asked. Why did he do it? Snowden
replied that he had become horrified by the NSA’s secret operations,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 113
9/29/16 5:51 PM
114 | how america lost its secrets
which, to him, represented a kind of distillation of the excesses of
the American national security state, and he had therefore made it
his mission to blow the whistle. He believed that the public needed
to be informed of the existence of a vast, secret surveillance operation
directed against tens of millions of Americans that flagrantly
violated U.S. laws and was a grave threat to their privacy and their
freedoms. Within hours of the release of that video on the Guardian
website, Snowden was known throughout the world as a courageous
whistle- blower.
In Laura Poitras’s remarks in accepting her Academy Award for
Citizenfour on February 22, 2015, she said that Snowden acted as a
whistle- blower not only to “expose a threat to our privacy but to our
democracy itself.” She received a standing ovation.
A large part of the public who viewed this powerful film, including
many of my colleagues in journalism whose writing I greatly
respect, came to accept Snowden’s whistle- blowing narrative. The
film so convincingly depicted Snowden as an altruistic young man
willing to risk his own personal freedom and face years of imprisonment
for the sake of others that editorial writers asked that he be
given clemency from prosecution.
“Sitting on his unmade bed— white sheets and covers, white headboard,
white bathrobe, white skin— Snowden seems like a figure
in some obscure ritual, being readied for sacrifice,” George Packer
wrote about the film in a widely read article in The New Yorker.
This powerful narrative, as lucidly articulated by Poitras, Greenwald,
and other Snowden supporters, described the NSA activities
exposed by Snowden as part of a vast criminal conspiracy involving,
among others, President Obama, James Clapper, the director of
national intelligence, and both Democratic and Republican members
of the congressional oversight committees. It further derided any
claims that there was evidence that Snowden’s theft of NSA secrets
went beyond simply exposing government misdeeds. For example,
this narrative asserted, as if it were established fact, that U.S. government
officials had deliberately “trapped” Snowden in Russia.
According to Snowden, the purpose of this government ploy was
to “demonize” him. “There was no question that I was going to be
subject to a demonization campaign,” Snowden said in an interview
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 114
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 115
from Moscow, “They [Greenwald and Poitras] actually recorded me
on camera saying this before I revealed my identity.” The purpose
of this demonization was to divert attention from the government’s
own crimes.
To be sure, it is not unprecedented for the government to release
defamatory information about individuals who have embarrassed
U.S. intelligence by defecting. When two NSA analysts, William
Martin and Bernon Mitchell, defected to Russia in the 1960s and
accused the NSA of violating international law after arriving in
Moscow, U.S. government officials responded by putting out the
story that they were homosexual lovers, which was both untrue and
irrelevant to the intelligence secrets that they had compromised. It
is certainly possible that the government put out information to
intentionally defame Snowden. Secretary of State John Kerry characterized
him as a coward who should “man up” by returning to the
United States.
While one can discount such characterizations against Snowden
by government officials as demonization, as I do, one cannot as easily
dismiss the independent evidence that undermines Snowden’s
assertion that his sole motive was blowing the whistle on illicit surveillance
in the United States. For example, in 2014, the Lawfare
Institute, a nonprofit organization that publishes a blog on national
security concerns, in cooperation with the Brookings Institution,
did an independent analysis of all the published documents that
Snowden provided to the media. It concluded that with some notable
exceptions, such as the two documents initially published by The
Guardian and the Post, the now- famous FISA Verizon warrant and
the PRISM slides, few of the other documents that Snowden had
given Poitras and Greenwald for publication had anything to do
with either domestic surveillance or infringements on the privacy of
Americans. By the Lawfare Institute’s count, 32 of Snowden’s leaks
to these journalists concerned the NSA’s overseas sources and methods,
9 identified overseas locations of the NSA’s intelligence bases,
25 revealed the identities of foreign officials of interest to U.S. intelligence
agencies, 14 disclosed information about Internet companies
legally cooperating with the NSA, and 19 concerned technology
products that the NSA had been using or researching.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 115
9/29/16 5:51 PM
116 | how america lost its secrets
Some secret methods that Snowden made public compromised
the NSA’s state- of- the- art technology of which adversaries had
been unaware. For example, the NSA had devised an ingenious technology
in 2008 for tapping into computers abroad that had been
“air- gapped,” or intentionally isolated from any network to protect
highly sensitive information, such as missile telemetry, nuclear bomb
development, and cyber- warfare capabilities. The secret method that
the NSA used involved surreptitiously implanting speck- sized circuit
boards into air- gapped computers. These devices then covertly
transmitted the data back in bursts of radio waves. Once Snowden
exposed this technology, and the radio frequency transmission it
used, America lost this intelligence capability.
In addition, a considerable number of the published documents
did not even belong to the NSA but were copies of reports sent to
the NSA by its allies, including the British, Australian, Canadian,
French, Norwegian, and Israeli intelligence services. Snowden provided
journalists with secret documents from the British cyber
service GCHQ, describing its plans to obtain a legal warrant to penetrate
the Russian computer security firm Kaspersky to expand its
“computer network exploitation capability.” What the GCHQ was
revealing in this secret document was its own capabilities to monitor
a Russian target of interest to British intelligence. While the release
of these foreign documents might have embarrassed allies of the
United States, they exposed no violations of U.S. law by the NSA. It
was a legitimate part of the NSA’s job to share information with its
allies. This raises the question: What constitutes whistle- blowing?
To the general public no doubt, a whistle- blower is simply a person
who exposes government misdeeds from inside that government.
But in the eyes of the law, someone who discloses classified
information to an unauthorized person, even as an act of personal
conscience, is not exempt from the punitive consequences of this act.
Indeed, if a person deliberately reveals secret U.S. operations, especially
ones that compromise the sources and methods of U.S. intelligence
services, he or she may run afoul of American espionage laws.
In the past, when government employees have disclosed highly
classified information to journalists to redress perceived government
misconduct, they were almost always prosecuted. During
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 116
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 117
Barack Obama’s presidency, there were six government employees
who, as a matter of personal conscience, shared classified information
they obtained from the FBI, the CIA, the State Department,
and the U.S. Army with journalists. They were all convicted: Shamai
Leibowitz in 2010, Chelsea Manning in 2013, John Kiriakou in
2013, Donald Sachtleben in 2013, Stephen Kim in 2014, and Jeffrey
Sterling in 2014. Like Snowden, they claimed to be whistle- blowers
informing the public of government abuses. But because they disclosed
classified documents, they were dealt with as lawbreakers. All
six were indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced to prison. Sterling,
a CIA officer who allegedly turned over a document to James Risen,
a Pulitzer Prize– winning reporter for the Times, was sentenced to
forty- two months. The most severe sentence was meted out to Private
Manning, whom an army court sentenced to thirty- five years
in a military stockade, as noted earlier.
The prison time that others received did not go unnoticed by
Snowden. He had been following the Manning case since 2012. In
fact, he posted about it shortly before he began stealing far more
damaging documents than Manning had. He would therefore likely
have been aware that by revealing state secrets he had sworn to protect,
he would be risking imprisonment unless, unlike Manning, he
fled the country. His motives, no matter how noble they might be,
would not spare him— any more than they spared the other six—
from determined federal prosecution.
The view of those on the Snowden side of the divide is grounded
not in legal definitions but in a broader notion of morality. Snowden’s
supporters do not accept that the law should be applied to Snowden
in this fashion. A writer for The New Yorker termed it “an act of
civil disobedience.” His supporters argue that Snowden had a moral
imperative to act, even if it meant breaking the law. They fully accept
his view that he had a higher duty to protect citizens of all countries
in the world from, as he put it, “secret pervasive surveillance.”
That higher duty transcended any narrower legal definitions of lawbreaking.
Ben Wizner, a lawyer from the American Civil Liberties
Union who has represented Snowden since October 2013, argues
that Snowden’s taking of classified documents was an “act of conscience”
that overrode any legal constraints because it “revitalized
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 117
9/29/16 5:51 PM
118 | how america lost its secrets
democratic oversight in the U.S.” and, without question, caused a
much- needed debate on government surveillance.
In this ends- justify- the- means view, any person with access to
government secrets can authorize him- or herself to reveal those
secrets to the world if she or he believes it serves the public good.
Further, because doing so would be an “act of conscience,” he or she
should be immune from legal prosecution.
For Snowden’s supporters, his “act of conscience” justifies his
claim to being a whistle- blower, even though the preponderance of
the secrets he disclosed had to do with the NSA’s authorized activity
of using its multibillion- dollar global arrays of sensors to intercept
data in foreign countries. For example, one of the thirty allied
intelligence services that the NSA cooperated with in 2013 was the
cyber service of Israel. Because Snowden deemed this cooperation
to infringe on privacy rights, he revealed documents bearing on
the NSA’s data exchange with Israel. He subsequently told James
Bamford, in an interview in Wired magazine in August 2014, that
supplying such intelligence to Israel was “one of the biggest abuses
we’ve seen.” Snowden therefore believed he was justified in revealing
information concerning Arab communications in Gaza, the West
Bank, and Lebanon that the NSA had provided the Israeli cyber service,
known as Unit 8200. In doing so, he compromised an Israeli
source. But how could this act qualify as whistle- blowing? Providing
Israel with such data was not some NSA rogue operation. It was part
of a policy that had been approved by every American president—
and every Congress— since 1948. Snowden had every right to personally
disagree with this established U.S. policy of aiding Israel with
intelligence, but it is another matter to release secret documents to
support his view. If the concept of whistle- blowing were expanded
to cover intelligence workers who steal secrets because they disagree
with their government’s foreign policy, it would also have to include
many notorious spies, such as Kim Philby.
Snowden’s concept of whistle- blowing also applied to the NSA’s
spying on adversary nations. “We’ve crossed lines,” Snowden said
in regard to China. “We’re hacking universities and hospitals and
wholly civilian infrastructure.” The NSA’s operations against China
were such “a real concern” for Snowden that he targeted lists of
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 118
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 119
the NSA’s penetrations in China. Putin echoed this expansion of the
whistle- blowing concept to adversaries. He complimented Snowden
for having “uncovered illegal acts by the United States around the
globe.” Putin’s defense of Snowden not only implied a global concept
of whistle- blowing that justifies breaking U.S. laws but also pointed
to America’s double standard in publicly complaining about Russian
and Chinese cyber espionage.
Snowden’s whistle- blower interpretation gained immense public
resonance. Even after President Obama and leaders of both houses
of Congress roundly denounced Snowden for betraying American
secrets, the majority of the public, according to a Quinnipiac poll
taken in July 2013, still considered “Snowden a whistleblower who
did a service revealing government domestic spying programs.”
Moreover, Snowden’s revelations helped stoke a growing distrust of
the American government itself. According to polls conducted by
the Pew Research Center after Snowden came forward, just 19 percent
of the public said that “they can trust the government always
or most of the time.” The support for Snowden was not limited to
America. On October 29, 2015, a majority of the European Parliament
voted to award Snowden the official status of a “human rights
defender.”
The former congressman Ron Paul went even further. He organized
a clemency petition in February 2014 for Snowden, stating,
“Thanks to one man’s courageous actions, Americans know about
the truly egregious ways their government is spying on them,” and
his son Senator Rand Paul, who was a candidate for the Republican
presidential nomination in 2016, called for a pardon for Snowden.
Senator Paul’s concern fitted with the growing public apprehension
over increasing intrusion on privacy. Snowden was correct,
in my opinion, in describing the threat of a surveillance state and
the loss of privacy as a legitimate public concern. “We actually buy
cell phones that are the equivalent of a network microphone that
we carry around in our pockets voluntarily,” he pointed out from
Moscow.
The very technology involved in the electronic equipment we all
use in the twenty- first century has made mass surveillance part of
our daily life. There can be little doubt that our privacy has been
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 119
9/29/16 5:51 PM
120 | how america lost its secrets
largely eroded, if not entirely negated, by the widespread use of
cell phones, credit cards, social media, and the search engines of the
Internet. When we use smart phones, our location is relayed to our
telephone service provider every three seconds. The phone companies
collect and archive our phone usage “metadata,” which includes
whom we called and how long we spoke. When we use Google
to search for anyone or anything on the Internet, that activity is
captured by Google, a company whose profits mainly come from
making available to advertisers the results of its surveillance and
collection of its users’ searches. When we use Gmail, Google’s e- mail
service, used by nearly one billion senders and recipients, we agree
to allow Google to read the actual contents of our correspondence to
find keywords of interest to advertisers.
When we use a credit card, the credit card company also retains
data about what we buy and where we go. When we travel in automobiles
equipped with GPS, every turn and stop is tracked and
recorded. And when we are in public places with CCTV (closedcircuit
television) cameras, our image is recorded and archived.
When we use Facebook, Twitter, and other so- called social media, as
over two billion people do today, we allow these companies to collect,
retain, and exploit their surveillance of our movements, associations
with other people, and stated preferences. When we use Amazon and
other online stores, we allow them to track and archive a great deal
of our commercial activity. For Internet companies such as Facebook,
Twitter, and Yahoo!, like Google, collecting private data on hundreds
of millions of their members provides them with vast searchable
databases that are easily marketable. The exploitation of these databases
is a fundamental aspect of their business plans. Without such
surveillance of their users, social media companies would not be able
to turn a profit. Indeed, they may be more aptly called surveillance
media than social media. For those of us who use them to post pictures
and communicate, any notion of personal privacy is largely
illusory.
To be sure, there is a distinction to be made between the surveillance
of our activities to which we voluntarily agree in exchange
for the benefits and conveniences that we gain from social media,
search engines, and other Internet companies and the surveillance
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 120
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 121
done by the government, which we do not voluntarily invite— or
want. We willingly waive our privacy for corporations but not for
governments.
What the public might not fully realize, however, is that the government
can access all the personal information in the databases of
private companies if it issues a subpoena or search warrant, which it
does often. As Snowden himself pointed out, “If Facebook is going
to hand over all of your messages, all of your wall posts, all of your
private photos, all of your private details from their server, the government
has no need to intercept all of the communications that constitute
those private records.” These Internet companies, even if they
are only interested in exploiting the data for their own profit, cannot
refuse to share this information with the NSA, the FBI, and other
government agencies if they have a subpoena or search warrant.
That reality became evident to me in my investigation of the rape
charges brought (and subsequently dropped) against Dominique
Strauss- Kahn, the managing director of the International Monetary
Fund, in 2011. Immediately after his arrest, Cyrus Vance Jr., the district
attorney of New York County, issued a subpoena for Strauss-
Kahn’s cell phone records, credit card records, hotel room electronic
key records, e- mails, room service bills, and the CCTV videos of his
activities (some of which I published in my article about the case
in The New York Review of Books). Nor is this access uncommon.
According to Vance in 2016, his office issues thousands of such subpoenas
every year. Even though Apple made headlines by refusing
to comply with a court order to help the FBI unlock the iPhone of
a dead mass murderer in 2016, it had complied with many previous
subpoenas. In fact, in 2015 alone, it quietly provided the backed- up
data of some seventy- one hundred iPhone customers to government
authorities.
If anyone doubts the pervasiveness of government data collection,
consider a little- known government agency called the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. Created in 2010 by Congress, it mines
data on a monthly basis from some 600 million personal credit card
accounts, targeting about 95 percent of the credit card users in the
United States. In addition, through eleven other data- mining programs,
it gathers data on everything from private home mortgages
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 121
9/29/16 5:51 PM
122 | how america lost its secrets
and student loans to credit scores and overdrafts in personal bank
accounts. This ubiquitous surveillance of virtually every non-cash
transaction came about because of advances in computer technology
that made it economically feasible to mine such data.
Snowden’s concern about NSA domestic surveillance is certainly
not misplaced. Ever since the 9/11 attacks, the NSA has increasingly
played a role in this surveillance state, not by its own choice, but
because Congress mandated it. In 2001, it empowered the NSA to
obtain and archive data on American citizens. Accordingly, the NSA
obtained the billing records of customers from phone and Internet
companies and archived these records. The bulk collection of these
billing records was intended to build a searchable database for the
government that could be used to trace the history of the telephone
and Internet activities in the United States of FBI- designated foreign
terrorists and spies abroad. The government’s rationale for keeping
these anti-terrorist programs secret from the public was that it did
not want the foreign suspects to realize their communications in
America were being monitored.
The public only learned that the phone company was routinely
turning over its billing records on June 6, 2013, when Snowden disclosed
it to The Guardian and The Washington Post. The documents
he provided the journalists showed that the NSA had been obtaining
phone records collected by Verizon every three months. While
this revelation might have shocked the American public, the NSA
had not acted on its own. It had acted under a warrant issued by a
secret court established by Congress in 1978 as part of the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act for each request for records. Congress
empowered the FISA court, whose judges are appointed by the president,
to hear cases and authorize search warrants in secret in cases
involving national security.
As its name implies, the FISA court was meant to deal with matters
bearing on foreign intelligence activities in the United States. That
restriction changed after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
A month after the attacks, Congress expanded the purview of the
FISA court by passing the USA Patriot Act (an acronym that stands
for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism). Part of the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 122
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 123
act, Section 215, euphemistically referred to as the “library records”
provision, permitted the FISA court to issue warrants authorizing
searches of records by the NSA and other federal agencies to investigate
international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities.
Through these FISA authorizations, the NSA could obtain “tangible
things” such as “books, records, papers, documents, and other items.”
Under the interpretation of this section of the law by both the Bush
and the Obama administrations, the FISA court was enabled by
Congress to issue warrants to telephone companies demanding that
they turn over to the NSA the bulk billing records of all calls made
in America. The FISA court need only deem these records to be “relevant”
to the FBI’s investigations of terrorists and spies.
Essentially, the NSA, to create a searchable database of telephone
billing records, used the FISA court’s controversial interpretation of
the word “relevant” in Section 215. Such a “haystack,” as the NSA
called the national collection of billing records, could allow the FBI
to instantly find missing “needles,” as this tracking was supposed to
work, even if the connections were made years earlier. For example,
if the FBI had a lead on a foreign suspect, it could search the database
for any telephone calls made by the foreign suspect to telephone
numbers in America and then who those people called. The
FBI always had this power, if it obtained a warrant, but it did not
previously have the “haystack” of records in a single database. General
Keith Alexander, who headed the NSA between 2005 and 2014,
believed that maintaining such a haystack database made sense. “His
approach was, ‘Let’s collect the whole haystack,’ ” according to one
former senior U.S. intelligence official quoted by The Washington
Post.
According to critics of NSA domestic surveillance, including the
ACLU, the results provided by this vast database did not justify its
immense potential for abuse. In early May 2015, just three weeks
before this part of the Patriot Act was set to expire, a three- judge
panel of the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York
agreed with the ACLU position, overturning a lower court decision
that said it was legal. The panel found that the word “relevant”
in the act was not intended by Congress to justify the acquisition
and storing of the bulk records of telephone companies for possible
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 123
9/29/16 5:51 PM
124 | how america lost its secrets
future use. Soon afterward, Congress replaced the Patriot Act with
the USA Freedom Act, which effectively transferred bulk storage of
billing records from the NSA to the phone companies themselves.
Despite the change in venue, the records of individuals were still not
completely private. Under the new law, the FBI via a FISA warrant
could still search the phone company’s databases.
The core of Snowden’s charge in the media was that the FISA
court overreached its authority by issuing sweeping warrants that
allowed the NSA to obtain data collected by private phone and Internet
companies. In the initial story published in The Guardian on
June 6, Snowden disclosed one such FISA warrant to support his
charge. It was issued by Judge Roger Vinson of the FISA court on
April 25, 2013, and ordered Verizon to turn over to the FBI all its
billing records of landline customers for the next ninety days. The
FBI presented this FISA authorization to the NSA, which acts as
a service organization for the FBI and the CIA in collecting communications
data. The NSA, with the FISA warrant in hand, then
obtained the Verizon billing records.
Snowden also provided the Post and The Guardian with another
secret document: a PowerPoint presentation on twenty slides, sent
by the NSA to other intelligence agencies. It described a program
it was using for monitoring the Internet. Its code name was the
aforementioned PRISM. It was authorized under Section 702 of the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and was designed to collect
messages sent over the Internet from foreigners. Such information
was in fact obtained with the knowledge of the service providers. It
also required a written directive from both the attorney general and
the director of national intelligence and a review by the Department
of Justice every three months for each and every case. After obtaining
this data, the NSA ran programs, as required by law, to filter out
all domestic Internet communications, but, as Snowden pointed out,
domestic information was also accidently picked up. Whenever the
Justice Department actually opened an investigation against Americans
in contact with foreign suspects, as it did in 170 cases in 2013,
it could obtain warrants from the FISA court to search these Americans’
Internet activities.
These two documents raised legitimate questions for many
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 124
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 125
Americans, including members of Congress, about the proper role
of the FISA court, including whether it should conduct its business
in secret. If Snowden had released only these two documents that
related to unwarranted domestic surveillance and other possible violations
of the law by the NSA, it would be difficult for any reasonable
person not to see his actions as a potentially valuable public service.
Indeed, additional safeguards were necessary in an age in which new
technologies enabled mass surveillance of the public. As the threejudge
panel of the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would later
find, Congress had not intended Section 215 of the Patriot Act to
be used to justify the bulk collection of American records. If he had
limited his illegal downloading to the few documents about bulk collection,
it would be more difficult to argue that he was not a whistleblower
in the spirit if not the letter of the law, and even a hero in
the struggle to preserve our civil liberties. But in fact, Snowden took
a great many other secret documents that did not bear on the civil
liberties of Americans. He claimed he was acting on behalf of citizens
in foreign countries by exposing the NSA’s and the CIA’s spying
operations abroad, but that same claim could also be made by any
espionage agent stealing U.S. secrets to benefit the people of another
country.
As a result, the Snowden case produced a great divide in the
American appreciation of him. On one hand, he has been almost
universally lauded and lionized by what might be seen as the mainstream
media, by numerous academics, and even, as we have seen,
by members of Congress. The journalists who assisted him, Greenwald,
Poitras, and Gellman, have been celebrated for the roles they
played in bringing Snowden’s revelations to the public and received
the 2014 Polk Award for national security reporting. The Post and
The Guardian, the newspapers that initially published the purloined
documents, won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for public service.
In other circles, the reaction has been very different. American
and British intelligence officials, senior members of the Obama
administration, and members of the oversight committees of Congress
do not view Snowden as a hero or even an authentic whistleblower.
Instead, they see him as a betrayer of secrets who willfully
brought damage to the United States and benefits to its adversar-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 125
9/29/16 5:51 PM
126 | how america lost its secrets
ies. The holders of this darker view of Snowden base it on classified
reports of the full extent of the theft of classified data. Those officials
believe that only a handful of the tens of thousands of documents he
stole involved domestic surveillance and that those few documents
served as a cover for a much larger theft.
Admiral Michael Rogers, who replaced General Alexander as
head of the NSA in March 2014, said at a public forum at Princeton
University, “Edward Snowden is not the ‘whistleblower’ some have
labeled him to be.” He further explained to Congress, “Snowden
stole from the United States government a large amount of classified
information, a small portion of which is germane to his apparent
central argument regarding NSA and privacy issues.”
General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
went even further. In testifying before the House Armed Services
Committee on March 6, 2014, after estimating that the Snowden
breach could cost the military “billions” to repair, he added, “The
vast majority of the electronic documents that Snowden exfiltrated
from our highest levels of security had nothing to do with exposing
government oversight of domestic activities.” Dempsey based this
assessment on a then still- secret Defense Intelligence Agency report
on the breach. The classified DIA report showed that Snowden took
“over 900,000” military files from the Department of Defense in
addition to the NSA files he had taken. The Defense Department
loss in terms of the number of files stolen actually exceeded the
loss— in sheer numbers— of NSA documents. Lieutenant General
Mike Flynn, the DIA director who directed the study, testified to the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that the breach “has caused
grave damage to our national security.”
To be sure, this was not the first time that the cryptological
branches of the military had been compromised. The spy ring of John
Walker had provided thousands of the navy’s reports on breaking
Russian ciphers to the KGB during the Cold War. But the Snowden
breach exposing military sources was an order of magnitude greater
than any past breach.
The CIA’s assessment was no less grim. Morell, the deputy director
of the CIA in 2013, wrote that Snowden’s action went beyond taking
the handful of documents, such as the FISA order, “that addressed
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 126
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 127
the privacy issue.” Instead, as Morell put it, “he backed up a virtual
tractor trailer and emptied a warehouse full of documents— the vast
majority of which he could not possibly have read and few of which
he would likely understand— [and] he delivered the documents to a
variety of news organizations and God knows who else.” As a result,
Morell concluded, “Snowden’s disclosures will go down in history
as the greatest compromise of classified information ever.” General
Alexander, the head of the NSA at the time of the theft, asserted that
Snowden did “the greatest damage to our combined nations’ intelligence
systems that we have ever suffered.” Obviously, military
intelligence officers would not be on Snowden’s side of the divide
(and the Snowden breach ended the careers of many of them, including
Alexander). But political leaders in both parties could also be
found on the anti- Snowden side of the divide. “I don’t look at this as
being a whistle- blower,” the Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein of
California, the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said after
she was briefed on Snowden’s theft. “I think it’s an act of treason.”
The Republican representative Mike Rogers of Michigan, her counterpart
on the House Intelligence Committee, said on the NBC program
Meet the Press that Snowden might be working for a foreign
intelligence service. And a former prominent member of President
Obama’s cabinet went even further, suggesting to me off the record
in March 2016 that there are only three possible explanations for the
Snowden heist: (1) it was a Russian espionage operation; (2) it was a
Chinese espionage operation; (3) it was a joint Sino- Russian operation.
These severe accusations generated much heat but little light.
They were not accompanied by any evidence showing that Snowden
had acted in concert with any foreign power in stealing the files or,
for that matter, that he was not acting out of his own personal convictions,
no matter how misguided they might have been.
On this side of the divide, Snowden’s critics regard the whistleblowing
narrative as at best incomplete and at worst fodder for the
naive. They point out that the FISA document that gave him credentials
as a whistle- blower was only issued in the last week of April
2013, which was four months after he first contacted Greenwald and
almost nine months after he began illegally copying secret documents.
They further believe that the evidence contradicts Snowden’s
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 127
9/29/16 5:51 PM
128 | how america lost its secrets
claims that he stole only documents that exposed NSA transgressions
into domestic surveillance, that he turned over all the stolen
documents to journalists, and that he was forced to remain in Moscow
by the actions of the U.S. government. They also find that the
unprecedented size and complexity of the penetration of NSA files,
compromising hundreds of thousands of secret documents pertaining
to U.S. operations against adversary nations, according to the
NSA’s and the Pentagon’s estimates, is not easily explained given
Snowden’s avowed purpose for his theft.
The deep split in how Snowden is perceived brings to mind the
famous drawing of a duck- rabbit cartoon first published in 1900 in
the book Fact and Fable in Psychology. The figure is perceived either
as a duck or as a rabbit, but it cannot be seen as both simultaneously.
Whether a person sees a rabbit or a duck in this test may depend
on the information available to that person. Similarly, what may
account for the sharp divide between the pro- Snowden and the anti-
Snowden camps is a disparity in their available information.
The pro- Snowden camp’s view is largely informed by Snowden
himself. Snowden supporters prefer to believe his words rather than
his actions. In the anti- Snowden camp are administration officials
and the members of the House and Senate intelligence oversight
committees who have been at least partially briefed on the continuing
investigations of the Snowden affair. The members of the
Senate Intelligence Committee, for example, were told by David
Leatherwood, the director of operations for the Defense Intelligence
Agency, that the military files compromised by Snowden included
documents bearing on military plans and weapons systems; foreign
governments’ intelligence activities (including special activities),
intelligence sources, or methods of cryptology; scientific and technological
matters relating to national security; and vulnerable systems,
installations, infrastructures, projects, plans, and protection services
related to national security and the development, production, or use
of weapons of mass destruction. The members of the House and
Senate Intelligence Committees, but not the public, have also been
privy to an NSA investigation that established the chronology of
Snowden’s actions, including changing jobs, copying more than one
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 128
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 129
million classified documents at the Signals Intelligence Center in
Hawaii, and flying to Russia.
Additional information does not necessarily change the minds of
people who already have a firm view. In the field of social psychology,
the testing of “confirmation theory” consistently shows that
people tend to more readily reject new information that contradicts
their pre-existing beliefs. For example, when Lee Harvey Oswald
was arrested in the Texas Theater on November 22, 1963, he said
famously, “I haven’t shot anybody.” Ten months later, the Warren
Commission presented evidence, including ballistic tests, that it
claimed showed that Oswald had shot three people, including President
John F. Kennedy, less than an hour before making his statement.
Yet many of those who believed Oswald’s public proclamation of
his innocence chose to believe that the government had falsified
all the incriminating evidence to tarnish Oswald (who had been
killed on November 24, 1963) rather than accept that they had
been wrong in believing Oswald.
The charges, countercharges, and defamatory name- calling in the
Snowden case therefore only deepened the great divide. Those who
saw Snowden as a democratic hero exposing the abuses of power of
an out- of- control national security state tended to dismiss anything
that depicted Snowden in a negative light as a fabrication, while
those who saw Snowden as a “traitor” tended to dismiss anything
that depicted him in a more positive light.
When it comes to the murky universe of spy agencies, the problem
in deciding where the truth lies is further heightened by the
possibility of deliberate deception. Spy masters are, after all, in the
business of concealing their most sensitive operations. It is often
considered essential that important secrets be protected by what
Winston Churchill famously termed “a bodyguard of lies.” Top
intelligence officials are not exempt from this practice. Consider, for
example, the response to a question concerning the NSA’s operations
made by James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, to
the Senate Intelligence Committee on March 12, 2013. The Democratic
senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, who was on the committee,
asked the spymaster if the NSA collected data on Americans. Clap-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 129
9/29/16 5:51 PM
130 | how america lost its secrets
per answered that the NSA did not knowingly “collect any type of
data” on millions of Americans. Clapper’s answer was clearly untrue,
but it did not mislead Senator Wyden or any other members of the
Senate Intelligence Committee; Clapper had truthfully testified in a
classified session of the committee earlier that week that the NSA
did collect Americans’ telephone records. It was the American people
who were being misled. Yet none of the senators on the committee
corrected this obviously false answer. When Clapper realized he had
misspoken, he could not publicly correct the record of the public session,
because to do so would be revealing classified information he
had sworn to protect. No doubt other intelligence officers find themselves
in a similar bind in discussing secret matters. This suggests
that there is a risk in accepting statements made by the intelligence
chiefs at face value.
But Snowden also has a credibility problem. He has told numerous
untruths, including some calculated to help him insinuate himself
into the key positions from which he stole secrets and some calculated
to cover up the nature of his theft. For example, Snowden got
access in the spring of 2013 to the NSA’s super-secret computers that
stored these electronic files by working at Booz Allen Hamilton. On
his application to Booz Allen in March 2013, as we’ve seen, Snowden
claimed to be in the process of completing a master’s degree at the
University of Liverpool in computer security sciences. Snowden had
not completed a single course there and purposely lied to get access
to classified documents and then to get safely away with them.
He was also not entirely truthful with the journalists whose
trust he sought when it suited his purpose of protecting himself.
For example, as we have seen, in contacting Laura Poitras under the
alias Citizen Four in January 2013, he told her that he was currently
a “government employee,” although in fact he was working for a
private contractor at the time.
Snowden had little concern about misleading journalists when
it suited his purpose. For example, he told Alan Rusbridger of The
Guardian, Brian Williams of NBC News, James Bamford of Wired,
Katrina vanden Heuvel of The Nation, Barton Gellman, and Jane
Mayer of The New Yorker that the U.S. government intentionally
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 130
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 131
acted to “trap” him in Moscow by revoking his passport while he
was already on a plane to Moscow on the afternoon of June 23.
None of these journalists asked Snowden what the basis for his oftrepeated
allegation was. If they had, they would have discovered that
he had no independent basis for his assertion. When asked about it
during the Q&A following his July 12 press conference in Moscow,
he indeed said that the only knowledge he had about the suspension
of his passport was what he had “read” in the news reports. But
all the news stories prior to his statement reported that his passport
had been revoked on June 22, while he was still in Hong Kong.
ABC News, for example, reported that the U.S. “Consul General–
Hong Kong confirmed Hong Kong authorities were notified that Mr.
Snowden’s passport was revoked June 22.” By advancing that date
to when his plane was in “midair” on June 23, Snowden provided to
unsuspecting journalists an untrue alibi for his presence in Russia.
The credibility problem with Snowden assumed a more sinister
dimension once he put himself and his fate in the hands of the Russian
authorities in Moscow. Even though the Obama administration
decided against revealing the extent of the Russian intelligence service’s
participation in Snowden’s move from Hong Kong to Moscow,
or what intelligence services call an “exfiltration,” I was told
by a presidential national security staff adviser that the government
acted to protect the intelligence sources used by the CIA, the NSA,
and the FBI to track Snowden’s movements in the latter part of June
in Hong Kong. The CIA’s deputy director, Morell, would go no further
than to state that during that period he had no doubt that the
intelligence services of Russia and China “had an enormous interest
in him and the information he [Snowden] had stolen.” Presumably,
the last thing these adversary services would want would be to make
this “interest” transparent to the United States.
The role of concealment must be taken into account when assessing
information bearing on the work of espionage services. When
I was interviewing James Jesus Angleton— the CIA’s legendary excounterintelligence
chief, active in the 1970s— for a book on deception,
I learned that intelligence services play by a different set of
rules from historians when it comes to their espionage successes.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 131
9/29/16 5:51 PM
132 | how america lost its secrets
Angleton, a famously baroque thinker himself, impressed on me the
complexity of espionage. He said, “It’s not enough just to steal a
secret. It must be done in a way that the theft remains undetected.”
Deception is employed to obscure the nature and the extent of
the espionage theft. One of the most famous examples of this principle
was the deception used by British intelligence in World War II
to conceal its success in breaking the German ciphers generated by
the Enigma machines. If German naval intelligence had discovered
Britain was able to read the ciphers it used to communicate with its
U- boats, it would have stopped using them. So British intelligence
hid its coup by supplying false information to known German spies
to account for the sinking of U- boats, including the canard that British
aerial cameras could detect one ingredient in the paint used to
camouflage the U- boats.
That same hoary principle of deception applies to modern- day
communications intelligence. If the Russian, Chinese, or any other
adversary intelligence service got its hands on the documents stolen
by Snowden from the NSA’s repositories in Hawaii in 2013, it would
likely employ deception, including well- crafted lies, to create as
much ambiguity as possible as to the missing documents. From this
counterintelligence perspective, the intelligence issue that spawned
the great divide cannot be resolved by accepting the uncorroborated
statements made by a source, such as Snowden, who may be in the
hands of the Russian security services in Moscow.
By the same token, the calculations made by NSA officials about
the extent of the theft are also suspect. After all, the NSA is an intelligence
service that often engages in secret machinations. We know
that its top officials reported to the House and Senate Intelligence
Committees, as well as the president’s national security adviser, that
Snowden compromised over one million documents. But if this was
disinformation, it is difficult to see its purpose. Inflating the extent
of the damage of the Snowden breach to the president, Congress,
and the secretary of defense obviously reflected poorly on their own
management of the NSA, and their own careers. Yet such a possibility
cannot be precluded in the arcane world of intelligence.
As in any case involving the loss of state secrets, uncontested facts
remain in extremely short supply. The opinion- laden appellatives
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 132
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Great Divide | 133
such as “patriot” and “traitor” that have tended to fill the gap in
the great divide do little to address the important mystery of how
many thousands of state secrets were taken from the United States.
How did Snowden breach the supposedly formidable defenses of the
NSA? Did he have any assistance? How did he escape to Moscow?
And what was the final destination of the stolen documents? How
Snowden succeeded in this coup cannot simply be pieced together
from his own statements and interviews. The story also requires a
visit into the wilderness of mirrors of a counterintelligence investigation.
For this endeavor, it is necessary to return to the crime scene:
the NSA’s base in Hawaii.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 133
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 14
The Crime Scene Investigation
Any private contractor, not even an employee of the government,
could walk into the NSA building, take whatever they wanted,
and walk out with it and they would never know.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
Fifteen miles northwest of Honolulu on the island of Oahu,
adjacent to the sprawling Wheeler Air Force Base, is a 250,000-
square- foot, man- made mound of earth and reinforced concrete surrounded
by an electrified fence. Inside the mound is a three- story
structure originally built by the air force in World War II as a bombproof
aircraft repair facility. In the Cold War, it was modernized to
withstand enemy chemical, biological, radiological, or electromagnetic
pulse attacks and was used by the navy’s operation center for
its Pacific fleet. After the Cold War, the huge edifice was turned over
to the NSA, which, as stated earlier, had been created as an intelligence
service to intercept the communications and signals of foreign
countries after World War II, a mission that included vacuuming
into its giant computer arrays telephone messages, missile telemetry,
submarine signals, and virtually everything on the electromagnetic
spectrum of interest to the U.S. Defense Department and
U.S. intelligence agencies. As the NSA developed it, this Hawaiian
base became one of its primary regional bases for gathering Asian
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 134
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Crime Scene Investigation | 135
communications intelligence. It provided a valuable window on the
activities of adversary nations in the Pacific region and was able to
monitor the ballistic missile tests and submarine activities of China,
North Korea, and Russia. By 2013, the Kunia base had a vast array
of state- of- the- art technology, including ninety Cray supercomputers
arranged in a horseshoe configuration, used to decipher and
make sense of the intercepted signals from China, Russia, and North
Korea. At the heart of the Hawaiian complex was a unit with both
military and civilian employees. A large share of the civilians who
ran the computers worked under two- year contracts with the NSA’s
leading civilian contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton.
General Alexander, who, as I said, headed the NSA in 2013, first
learned about an impending story in The Guardian on June 4, while
he was in Germany meeting with its top intelligence officials, from
Janine Gibson, The Guardian’s American website editor. She had
notified the NSA it intended to break a story focusing on the organization.
It took NSA counterintelligence less than forty- eight hours
to determine that a civilian employee at the base from which documents
were stolen had not reported back to work on May 22. His
civilian supervisor had delayed reporting the absence to the NSA
until May 28. It also determined that the missing civilian employee,
Snowden, had lied on his application for a medical leave and had
flown to Hong Kong. Personal records showed he was being trained
as an analyst at the Threat Operations Center and had worked there
for less than six weeks. He had taken the medical leave on May 18
and left the country by plane. By June 6, he had become the NSA’s
main suspect.
Alexander flew to Washington, D.C., after assigning the sensitive
job of investigating the breach to a team headed by Richard
“Rick” Ledgett, who was then director of the NSA’s Threat Operations
Center at the NSA’s headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.
Ledgett was the logical choice to head the damage assessment investigation
because the center’s regional branch in Hawaii was under
his command. Ledgett flew to Hawaii, where his first task was to
reconstruct the chronology of Snowden’s moves, or, as the tactic is
called in counterintelligence parlance, “walking the cat back.”
The NSA had also notified the FBI of Snowden’s possible involve-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 135
9/29/16 5:51 PM
136 | how america lost its secrets
ment in the theft of state secrets in the first week of June. The FBI
is in charge of criminal investigations of civilian U.S. intelligence
workers, even if the alleged crime occurs on an NSA base. The FBI
immediately dispatched a task force of agents to investigate a potential
espionage case in Hawaii. When questioned, Lindsay Mills said
Snowden was away on a business trip. After determining from
airline and hotel data that he was in Hong Kong, the FBI realized
Snowden was a possible intelligence defector. It froze his credit and
bank cards. It also notified the passport office in the State Department
and the legal attachés at the Hong Kong consulate. The legal
attachés, who were actually FBI field agents posted in Hong Kong,
located Snowden at the Mira hotel on June 8. On the evening of
June 9, Snowden revealed in his twelve- minute video posted on the
Guardian website that he was the source of the stolen NSA documents.
Because Hong Kong is part of China, U.S. law enforcement
did not have the means to recover them.
At that point, determining the magnitude of the theft of documents
became a critical concern of the investigation. Aside from the
few dozen documents published by The Guardian and The Washington
Post, what else had Snowden stolen?
Within the next few days, a small army of forensic investigators
from the FBI, the Defense Department, and the “Q” counterintelligence
division of the NSA swarmed onto the NSA base in Hawaii.
The proximate crime scene for their investigation was the National
Threat Operations Center. They examined the cubicle where
Snowden had last worked and then began retracing all his activities
at the NSA from 2009 to 2013. To begin with, they needed to
find out how many documents from the center had been copied and
taken by Snowden.
Meanwhile, the Defense Intelligence Agency (the Pentagon’s own
intelligence service) was kept partially in the dark. Although the
NSA is officially part of the Department of Defense, it operated with
a high degree of autonomy with its own inspector general, investigative
staff, and reporting channels. The DIA did not learn from
the NSA that Snowden had stolen military documents concerning
the joint Cyber Command until July 10. The number of stolen military
documents from the Department of Defense was staggering.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 136
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Crime Scene Investigation | 137
The DIA found from its forensic examination that Snowden had
copied “over 900,000” military files. Many of these non- NSA files
came from the Cyber Command, which had been set up in 2011
by the NSA and the army, navy, marine, and air force cryptological
services to combat the threat of warfare in cyberspace. The loss
was considered of such importance that between 200 and 250 military
intelligence officers worked day and night for the next four
months, according to the DIA’s classified report, to “triage, analyze,
and assess Department of Defense impacts related to the Snowden
compromise.” The job of this unit, called the Joint Staff Mitigation
Oversight Task Force, was to attempt to contain the damage caused
by the Snowden breach. In many cases, containment meant shutting
down NSA operations in China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran so
they could not be used to confuse and distract the U.S. military.
The NSA and the Defense Department were not the only government
agencies concerned with determining the extent of the
breach. The NSA acted as a service organization for the CIA through
handling most if not all of its requests for communications intelligence
to support both its international espionage and its analytic
operations. Although the CIA and the NSA were both part of the socalled
intelligence community, the NSA did not immediately share
with the CIA details of the Snowden breach. Despite the immense
potential damage of the theft, it was not until June 10 that the CIA’s
director, John Owen Brennan, and his deputy, Michael Morell, were
briefed by the NSA. When Morell realized how much data Snowden
had taken, he was astounded.
“You might have thought of all the government entities on the
planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been
the NSA,” he wrote. “But it turned out that the NSA had left itself
vulnerable.” According to Morell, he bluntly told the NSA briefer
that it was urgent for the CIA to be brought in on the case. After all,
the CIA had employed Snowden only four years earlier. Specifically,
Morell said, the CIA needed to find out three things: Had CIA documents
been part of Snowden’s haul? How long had Snowden been
stealing documents? Had Snowden been working “with any foreign
intelligence service, either wittingly or not”?
According to Morell, the effort to get a direct answer from NSA
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 137
9/29/16 5:51 PM
138 | how america lost its secrets
officials to these three key questions “proved maddeningly difficult.”
He found that in mid- June NSA officials with whom he dealt
were so “distraught at the massive security breach” that initially
they refused to allow even CIA officers to participate in the ongoing
security review. A former NSA executive told me there was “near
panic” at the NSA. Finally, Morell called Chris Inglis, a former professor
of computer science who had risen to be the NSA’s deputy
director at the time of the breach. Inglis, who headed operations for
the NSA, told him “the news was not good.” Among the data copied
by Snowden were a large number of CIA secrets. By the time the
CIA learned that its secrets had been compromised, Snowden was
headed to Russia.
The investigation of a crime involving potential espionage is no
easy task. In this case, it required attempting to solve a jigsaw puzzle
in which not only were key pieces missing but also, because it
involved adversary intelligence services, some of the found pieces
might deliberately have been twisted to mislead the U.S. investigators.
By late July, NSA investigators had made their initial assessment.
They determined that most of the material had been taken from
sealed- off areas known in intelligence speak as “compartments,”
which in this case were files stored on computers that were isolated
from any network. Each compartment electronically tracks all the
activities that occur in it on its logs, including the password identity
of any person who has gained entry to any compartment. From a
forensic examination of these logs, NSA investigators were quickly
able to reconstruct the timeline of the theft. The logs showed that an
unauthorized party without proper passwords had begun copying
files in mid- April, which was just days after Snowden began his job
at the center. The illicit activity ended just before Snowden’s last day
of work there. So this piece fit in with Snowden’s guilt.
The size of the theft was another matter. Ledgett was certainly in
a position to know (in the shake- up that followed, he would replace
Inglis as deputy director of the NSA). According to Ledgett, the perpetrator
had “touched” 1.7 million documents, moving from compartment
to compartment. Of these “touched” documents, according
to the analysis of the logs, more than one million of them had been
moved by the unauthorized party in mid- May to an auxiliary com-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 138
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Crime Scene Investigation | 139
puter intended to be used for temporary storage by authorized service
personnel. Finally, the data was transferred off this auxiliary
computer presumably to thumb drives or other external storage
devices. This download occurred just days before Snowden left the
NSA on May 17, 2013, having told the agency that he needed a medical
leave of absence.
The quantity of stolen documents, 1.7 million, does not necessarily
reveal the damage and can itself be misleading. Many documents
do not reveal current or known sources or methods, and others may
have little value to an enemy. And a large portion of the documents
might have been duplications. The quality of some of these documents
is another matter. Just one document that exposed a source
or method of which enemies are unaware can be of immense value.
One such document taken by Snowden provided what Ledgett called
“a roadmap” to the NSA’s current secret operations, revealing to an
adversary such as Russia, China, or Iran “what we know, what we
don’t know, and, implicitly, a way to protect themselves.” There were
many documents in the Snowden breach that met these criteria,
according to a national security official at the Obama White House.
General Alexander closely followed the investigation as it developed
over the summer of 2013. By then, of course, the whole world
knew that Snowden had stolen a vast trove of NSA documents.
Alexander saw major inconsistencies developing between Snowden’s
personal account of the theft and what had actually happened. The
timeline established by the government’s investigators did not
match Snowden’s story line. “Something is not right,” Alexander
said in an interview.
For one thing, Snowden had made the claim to journalists, four
months after he was in Russia, that he had turned over all the
documents he took from the NSA’s compartments to Poitras and
Green wald in Hong Kong. On August 18, the investigators had the
opportunity to examine the files that Snowden had given to Poitras
and Greenwald. This discovery came when British authorities, under
Schedule 7 of Britain’s Terrorism Act, detained David Miranda,
Green wald’s romantic partner, at Heathrow Airport. Miranda was
suspected of acting as a courier for Greenwald and Poitras. According
to Greenwald’s account, Snowden had given both him and Poi-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 139
9/29/16 5:51 PM
140 | how america lost its secrets
tras identical copies of the NSA documents in Hong Kong. When
Green wald returned home to Rio de Janeiro, he found his copy was
corrupted. But Poitras still had her digital copy of whatever stolen
documents Snowden had distributed to them. So Greenwald dispatched
Miranda from Rio to Berlin to get a copy of Poitras’s thumb
drive. On the return trip, Miranda’s plane stopped at Heathrow,
where British authorities detained him and temporarily took the
thumb drive from him. Poitras had written out the password for
Greenwald, and Miranda kept it with the thumb drive. The British
copied the contents and shared them with the NSA. As a result,
the NSA discovered that Snowden had only given Poitras fifty- eight
thousand documents. The damage assessment team under Ledgett
determined that some of these documents had been edited out of
much larger documents that the NSA logs showed Snowden had
copied. By the count of both the NSA and the Defense Department
teams, almost one million documents were unaccounted for. What
happened to the missing documents?
The NSA investigation found that the chronology of the theft
of documents did not support Snowden’s claim to journalists that
he had only been seeking whistle- blowing documents. Most of the
documents he took first did not concern the domestic activities of the
NSA. Only toward the end of the theft did he copy documents that
would qualify as whistle- blowing. The court order to Verizon that
was the basis of the initial Guardian exposé was only issued by the
FISA court on April 27, 2013. The other main whistle- blowing document
he revealed, the PowerPoint presentation about PRISM, was
only issued in April 2013. Yet Snowden had been downloading documents
for at least nine months before he copied these documents.
When I discussed the chronology of the copied documents with
a former government official briefed on the investigation, he suggested
that Snowden’s purpose might have changed between 2012
and 2013. When I asked him what might have induced the change,
he replied, “That is one of the unanswered questions.” That Snowden
only took these two whistle- blowing documents at the tail end of
his nine- month operation, and after he had contacted Poitras and
Green wald, suggests he might have had another motive prior to
contacting journalists. In light of this chronology, the investigation
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 140
9/30/16 11:09 AM
The Crime Scene Investigation | 141
had to consider the possibility that his whistle- blowing was, partly if
not wholly, a cover for another enterprise.
Snowden told journalists he had access to “millions of records
that [he] could walk out the door with at any time with no accountability,
no oversight, no auditing, the government didn’t even know
they were gone.” However, he was not among the limited number
of individuals at the center who had access to these documents.
Both the NSA’s and Booz Allen’s employment records showed that
Snowden had not yet completed his requisite on- the- job training
when he carried out the theft. Consequently, he had not yet been
provided with the passwords he needed to get the documents. Even
if he had remained at the NSA long enough to finish his training,
he would only have been provided with the password to the particular
compartment relevant to his work, not to all compartments. The
tight control over these passwords was, according to a former top
NSA official, a critical part of the NSA’s security framework. He told
me that Snowden, at least during the period of the thefts in April
and May 2013, had no more legitimate access to the compartments
than the cleaning personnel. Somehow, though, Snowden converted
his proximity to access.
If a hundred top- quality diamonds were stolen from locked vaults
at Tiffany by a recently hired trainee who, it turned out, did not have
the combination to open these vaults, the police would be expected to
consider that the trainee might have had help from a current or former
insider at the company who knew the combinations. Snowden,
who had accomplished a similarly inexplicable feat, said in his video
confession that he was solely responsible. However, it is perfectly
logical to assume, given the circumstances, that he might have had
help, unwitting or witting.
The FBI could assume either that the NSA’s security regime was
so badly flawed that Snowden could trick his fellow workers into
providing him with access or that there was another individual at
the center who might have assisted or directed Snowden. When the
investigation came to this fork in the road in the summer of 2013,
according to a source on the House Intelligence Committee, it chose
the former route.
Finally, there was the question of whether Snowden had gone to
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 141
9/30/16 11:09 AM
142 | how america lost its secrets
Russia by design or by accident. Whenever an intelligence worker
steals sensitive compartmented information of interest to a foreign
adversary and then defects to that adversary, it raises at least the
specter of state- sponsored espionage. It is a commonly accepted presumption
in counterintelligence that a spy, fearing arrest, flees to
a country that has some reason to offer him protection. When the
British spies Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, and Kim Philby fled to
Moscow during the Cold War, the presumption was that they had a
prior intelligence connection with Russia. Philby confirmed that in
his 1968 memoir, My Silent War. So in the case of Snowden, counterintelligence
had to consider the possibility that his theft of state
secrets and his arrival in Moscow might not be totally coincidental.
Snowden blamed high officials in the U.S. government who purposely
“trapped him” in Russia. He told the editor of The Nation,
“I’m in exile. My government revoked my passport intentionally to
leave me exiled” and “chose to keep me in Russia.” He repeated that
assertion over a dozen times, but as we’ve seen, it had no basis in
fact. Whenever criminal charges are lodged against a U.S. citizen by
the Department of Justice, the State Department, in accordance with
the U.S. code of justice, marks in the electronic passport validation
advisory system that that person’s passport is valid only for return
to the United States. After criminal charges were publicly filed
against Snowden on June 21, it advised foreign governments that
because Snowden was wanted on felony charges, he “should not be
allowed to proceed in any further international travel, other than is
necessary to return him to the United States.” Rather than “exiling”
Snowden, the government acted to facilitate his return home. With
his passport, he could have flown home from either Hong Kong or
Moscow, where he, like any other person accused of a felony, would
face the charges against him. Snowden’s unfounded claims suggested
to investigators that he had something to hide about his arrival in
Russia.
The counterintelligence investigation had access to State Department
records showing that its representatives in Hong Kong had
informed authorities there on June 16 that there were criminal
charges against Snowden. Only a typographical error in spelling out
Snowden’s middle name— James instead of Joseph— in the criminal
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 142
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Crime Scene Investigation | 143
charges prevented the Hong Kong police from immediately ordering
his detention. His Hong Kong lawyers were certainly advised of
these pending charges no later than June 21, when they were published
on the front page of the South China Morning Post in Hong
Kong. Presumably, Snowden knew that actions by the U.S. government
were already in progress and that one of these actions would
include restricting his passport. One of his lawyers, Jonathan Man,
even accompanied Snowden to the airport out of his concern that he
would not be allowed by Hong Kong authorities to go through passport
control. Ordinarily, Hong Kong passport control scans passports
when tourists exit but does not check them against a computerized
database.
In any case, when Snowden arrived in Russia on June 23, any
future international travel decisions for him would be up to the government
of Russia, not that of the United States. It could have sent
him back to Hong Kong, as is normally done when someone arrives
without a proper visa, or to the United States. The only government
with the actual means to “trap” him in Russia was the Russian
government.
Senior intelligence officials also knew that the U.S. government,
rather than conspiring to keep Snowden in Moscow, had met nearly
every day while he was in Hong Kong with Lisa Monaco, President
Obama’s homeland security adviser, in the White House Situation
Room to find a way to prevent Snowden and his cache of secrets
from falling into Russian hands. Robert S. Mueller III, then the FBI
director, reportedly even directly appealed to the FSB head, Alexander
Bortnikov, to return Snowden to the United States.
U.S. intelligence also knew that it was no accident that Snowden
wound up in the hands of Russia. He had been in contact with Russian
officials in Hong Kong. It will be recalled that Putin admitted to
this liaison on September 3, in a press briefing on state- owned Channel
One television; he also divulged that he had advance knowledge
of Snowden’s plan.
“I will tell you something I have never said before,” Putin said.
Snowden “first went to Hong Kong and got in touch with our diplomatic
representatives.” Putin was told then that an American “agent
of special services” was seeking to come to Russia. Putin added that
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 143
9/29/16 5:51 PM
144 | how america lost its secrets
he declared that this agent would be “welcome, provided, however,
that he stops any kind of activity that could damage Russian- US
relations.”
Even before that public confirmation of the Russian role in Hong
Kong, the White House was well aware of it. On June 23, the Democratic
senator Charles Schumer of New York correctly said, based
on a White House briefing, that “Vladimir Putin had personally
approved Snowden’s flight” to Moscow. The NSA had the means to
monitor Russian communication between Moscow and Hong Kong.
The NSA also reportedly intercepted contacts between these Russian
officials and Russian representatives of Aeroflot, the Russian stateowned
airline that had flights between Hong Kong and Moscow.
Aeroflot (like most other international carriers) ordinarily requires
international passengers to have both a valid passport and, if necessary,
a visa to the country of their destination. Those rules had to
be waived for Snowden’s exfiltration from Hong Kong. Snowden’s
defection to Moscow was not a haphazard result of unexpected circumstances.
Russia obviously knew he was coming. This raised new
questions for the investigation. What led Snowden to defect to Russia?
Was his arrival in Moscow planned by Russian intelligence in
advance of his going public in Hong Kong? Was any other party,
such as China, privy to the plan? Was there a quid pro quo?
Putin’s authorization could certainly account for Aeroflot’s waiving
its usual passport and visa check to allow Snowden to board its
plane, as well as the dispatch with which Russian officials whisked
Snowden off the plane after it landed at the Moscow airport. It could
also account for Snowden’s vanishing from public view for the next
three weeks and the promulgation of the cover story that Snowden
was unwillingly trapped at the airport by the U.S. government. The
reasons behind Putin’s move were less clear.
By September 2013, the investigation was looking into a veritable
abyss. Snowden’s culpability was no longer an issue. What was
lacking from Snowden’s video, or the two- hour film made by Laura
Poitras, was any specific information on how many documents he
had copied, how he had obtained the passwords to the computers
on which they were stored, the period of time involved in the theft,
or how he had breached all the security measures of the NSA in
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 144
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Crime Scene Investigation | 145
Hawaii. Nor would that data be forthcoming from Snowden, who
may be the only witness to the crime. By June 23, he was in a safe
haven in Moscow. Even though the grand jury case against Snowden
was cut and dry, it was also irrelevant because the United States does
not have an extradition treaty with Russia.
The purpose of the intelligence investigation went far beyond
determining Snowden’s guilt or innocence, however. Its job was to
find out how such a massive theft of documents could occur, how the
perpetrator escaped, and, perhaps most urgent, who had obtained the
unaccounted- for stolen documents from Snowden.
In his interviews with journalists in Moscow, Snowden studiously
avoided describing the means by which he breached the security
aperture of America’s most secret intelligence service. He only told
the journalists who came to Moscow to interview him, with a bit of
pseudo- modesty, that he was not “an angel” who descended from
heaven to carry out the theft. But the question of how Snowden
stole these documents may be the most important part of the story.
The NSA, after all, furnishes communications intelligence to the
president, his national security advisers, and the Department of
Defense, intelligence that is supposedly derived from secret sources
in adversary nations. If these adversary nations learn about the
NSA’s sources, then the information, if not worthless, cannot be
fully trusted. The most basic responsibility of the NSA is to protect
its sources. Yet Snowden walked away with long lists of them.
In doing so, he amply demonstrated that a single civilian employee
working for an outside contractor, even one not having the necessary
passwords and other access privileges, could steal documents
that betrayed these vital sources. He also demonstrated that such a
massive theft could go undetected for at least two weeks.
If Snowden managed this feat on his own, as he claims in his
Hong Kong video, it suggests that any other civilian employee with
a perceived grievance against NSA practices or American foreign
policy could also walk away with some of the most precious secrets
held by U.S. intelligence. Such vulnerability extends to tens of thousands
of civilian contract employees in positions similar to the one
held by Snowden. The lone disgruntled employee explanation is
therefore hardly reassuring. If true, it calls into question the entire
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 145
9/29/16 5:51 PM
146 | how america lost its secrets
multibillion- dollar enterprise of outsourcing the management of the
NSA’s computer networks and other technical work to outside contractors.
It also casts doubts on the post- 9/11 decision by the intelligence
community to strip away much of the NSA’s “stovepiping”
that previously insulated its most sensitive computers. Without
such stovepiping, any rogue civilian employee could bring down the
entire edifice of shared intelligence.
A finding that Snowden had acted in concert with others in breaching
compartments at the NSA would hardly be any more reassuring.
Such collaboration among intelligence workers would reflect gravely
on the mind- set of the NSA. Snowden described an atmosphere in
which intelligence workers exchanged lewd photographs of foreign
suspects. Some NSA employees met to protest the NSA policies. Did
this violation of the NSA’s rules also involve abetting the theft of
documents? If so, the NSA would have to evaluate further vulnerabilities
that might arise when it entrusts its secrets to technicians
who do not share its values. A collaborative breach would signal an
immense failure of the present concept of the counterintelligence
regime in the NSA.
From what I gathered from government officials who were familiar
with the investigation, there was a concern that answering the
“how” question would rouse serious doubts about the very ability
of the NSA to carry out its core mission of protecting the government’s
intelligence secrets. However it was organized, it was clear
that Snowden had played a major role in what amounted to a brilliant
intelligence coup.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 146
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 15
Did Snowden Act Alone?
When you look at the totality of Snowden’s actions certainly one
hypothesis that jumps out at you, that seems to explain his ability
to do all these things, is that he had help and had help from
somebody who was very competent in these matters.
— general michael hayden, former director, NSA and CIA
A
whistle- blower enters the enterprise of stealing state
secrets for reasons of conscience, but so do many spies. Such
conscience- driven spies are called, in CIA parlance, “ideological
agents.” For instance, the British diplomat Donald Maclean, one
of the most important Russian spies in the Cold War, was an ideological
recruit. He stole immensely valuable U.S. nuclear secrets
for the Russian intelligence service without receiving any monetary
compensation.
The acceptance of money is not necessarily a meaningful distinction
when it comes to espionage. To be sure, many spies get
paid, but some whistle- blowers also receive a rich bounty for their
work. Indeed, under federal laws, whistle- blowers can qualify for
multimillion- dollar bounties for exposing financial malfeasance. The
whistle- blower Bradley Birkenfeld, for example, after he himself
was paroled from prison in 2012, received an award of $104 million
for providing data that exposed illicit tax sheltering at the Swiss UBS
bank. Assange also offered political whistle- blowers six- figure cash
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 147
9/29/16 5:51 PM
148 | how america lost its secrets
bounties from money raised on the Internet. In 2015, for instance,
WikiLeaks offered $100,000 bounties to any whistle- blowers who
provided the site with secret documents exposing details of the
Trans- Pacific Trade Agreement.
Nor is acting alone necessarily a line that divides whistle- blowers
from spies. In many cases, whistle- blowers have accomplices who
help them carry out their mission. For example, in 1969, the celebrated
whistle- blower Daniel Ellsberg, a military analyst at the
Rand Corporation, had an accomplice, Anthony Russo, who had also
worked at Rand. (Both were indicted by the government.) Acting in
concert, they copied secret documents that became known famously
as the Pentagon Papers.
Whistle- blowers can also, like conventional spies, enter into elaborate
conspiracies to carry out an operation. On the night of March 8,
1971, eight whistle- blowers working together with burglary tools
broke into the FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania, and stole almost all
the FBI files there. The conspirators escaped and kept their identities
secret for over forty- two years.
Self- definitions also do not necessarily produce a distinction
between whistle- blowers and conventional spies. Consider Philip
Agee, who left the CIA in 1969 for what he described as “reasons
of conscience.” Specifically, he said he objected to the CIA’s covert
support of Latin American dictators. After contacting the Soviet
embassy in Mexico City, he defected to Cuba, where he leaked information
that exposed CIA operations. Although Agee insisted he was
a whistle- blower, and he adamantly denied offering any secrets to the
Soviet Union, the KGB viewed him as a conventional spy. According
to Oleg Kalugin, the top Soviet counterintelligence officer in the
KGB in Moscow, who defected to the United States, Agee offered
CIA secrets first to the KGB residency in Mexico City in 1973 and
then to the Cuban intelligence service. Agee provided the KGB with
a “treasure trove” of U.S. secrets, Kalugin revealed. “I then sat in
my office in Moscow reading the growing list of revelations coming
from Agee.” Despite this disparity, Agee still defined himself to the
public as a whistle- blower because he also had exposed CIA operations
to the public.
The Snowden case blurs the demarcation line even further. Unlike
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 148
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Did Snowden Act Alone? | 149
other whistle- blowers who uncovered what they considered government
malfeasance by virtue of their jobs, Snowden, by his own
admission, took a new job in 2013 specifically to get access to the SCI
files concerning NSA sources that he stole from the Threat Operations
Center. Switching jobs in order to widen one’s access to state
secrets is an activity usually associated with penetration agents, not
whistle- blowers. While the technical distinction between a whistleblower
and a spy may still serve the media in the case of Snowden,
it does not help in solving the counterintelligence conundrum. A
complex theft of state secrets had been successfully carried out in
a supposedly secure site. The only known witness, Snowden, had
escaped to Russia, where he could be of no help in reconstructing the
crime for American intelligence agencies. The stolen data was kept
in the equivalent of sealed “vaults”— actually computer drives that
were not connected to the NSA network. If ever there was a lockedroom
mystery, this was it.
According to the FBI investigation, Snowden pierced these barriers
by using passwords that belonged to other people and using credentials
that allowed him to masquerade as a system administrator.
It was a feat that must have required meticulous planning.
To address such a mystery, a counterintelligence investigation
starts with a tabula rasa, stripping away all the previous assumptions,
including that Snowden was the lone perpetrator. It builds
alternative scenarios to test against the known facts. To be sure, scenario
building differs from that of a conventional forensic investigation
aimed at finding pieces of evidence that can be used to persuade
a jury in a courtroom. Unlike a judicial investigation concerned with
guilt and innocence, scenario building looks to develop a story that
is, concurrently, intrinsically consistent and humanly plausible, and
in the process it also identifies and explores the possible holes in the
case.
“Scenarios deal with two worlds: the world of facts and the world
of perceptions. They explore for facts but they aim at perceptions
inside the heads of decision makers. Their purpose is to gather and
transform information of strategic significance into fresh perceptions,”
wrote Pierre Wack in the Harvard Business Review in 1985.
Such scenarios must aim at constituting a limited set of mutually
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 149
9/29/16 5:51 PM
150 | how america lost its secrets
exclusive alternatives. The point is to assure that any alternative that
fits the relevant facts, no matter how implausible it may initially
seem to be, is not neglected.
One of the most vexing problems that had to be explained by these
scenarios is how Snowden got the passwords to up to twenty- four of
these vaults. He could not have obtained these passwords during his
previous employment at Dell, because Dell technicians did not have
access to the Level 3 documents stored in these compartments. Nor,
as noted earlier, was he given access to them when he transferred to
Booz Allen, because he had not completed the requisite training.
Snowden had also, it will be recalled, relinquished his privileges as
a system administrator when he transferred to Booz Allen, so he did
not have the privilege to override password protection. In short, his
new position as an infrastructure analyst did not give him the ability
to enter compartments that he had not yet been read into.
As I’ve said, there are two possible ways he could have gotten
these passwords: either he had assistance from a party who had
access to them, or he found flaws in the NSA’s security procedures
that left the supposedly closed vaults effectively unlocked.
The Unwitting Accomplice Possibility
It is possible that if Snowden received assistance, it was entirely
unwitting. He might have obtained some passwords through deception,
such as tricking co- workers into typing their passwords into
a device that captured them. As the NSA informed Congress in
2014, three of his fellow workers told the FBI that Snowden might
have deceived them to gain access to their passwords. He could have
simply asked other analysts at the center who had been read into
compartments for their passwords. Such an approach would be
extremely risky for the analyst, who could lose his job and security
clearance by cooperating. It could also be risky for Snowden because
any analyst he approached was supposed to report any request for
a password to a security officer. Making such requests even more
suspicious, Snowden had been working at the Threat Operations
Center for just a few weeks as a trainee and was not well known to
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 150
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Did Snowden Act Alone? | 151
other analysts there. “It is inconceivable to me that his co- workers
would divulge their passwords to him,” a former Booz Allen executive,
who had also worked at the Defense Intelligence Agency, told
me. “If he was a system administrator, he might trick a threat analyst
into entering his password into his computer under the pretext
that he needed it to deal with an urgent hardware issue.” But,
it will be recalled, Snowden was not a system administrator at the
center. Snowden therefore “had no plausible reason for requesting
passwords to compartments he had not been read into,” the former
executive said. He said that NSA executives might have been read
into all twenty- four of the compartments, but he deemed it inconceivable
they would illicitly share their passwords with Snowden. I
asked him what the chance was of his voluntarily obtaining some
twenty- four passwords from co- workers in five weeks. “In my opinion,
near zero,” he said.
It is possible of course that Snowden could have simply observed
others typing in their passwords, one by one, but that would take
time and possibly attract attention. I asked the former Booz Allen
contractor whether it was possible that Snowden could have used a
device for intercepting another computer’s electronic signals, called
by hackers a “key logger.” Such a device, which is obtainable over
the Internet, could be used to steal the passwords of the analysts
who had been read into the compartments. My source said that
while it was possible that Snowden smuggled in a key logger in his
backpack, it could not be operated unless it was hardwired to a computer
inside the center, because, like those at all other NSA facilities,
the computers had been insulated to block any form of wireless
transmission. This precaution was taken to guard against an EMP, or
electromagnetic pulse, attack by an enemy. The only way Snowden
could intercept keystrokes was to attach a cable from his key logger
to each of his fellow workers’ computers. In this scenario, he would
have had to surreptitiously build his own wired network connecting
his hidden key logger to twenty- four separate computers. Moreover,
he would have to do this wiring in an open- plan office where
he could not count on these additional wires, even if rigged one by
one, not being noticed by either other analysts in the room or the
“geek squad” of system administrators who regularly checked con-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 151
9/29/16 5:51 PM
152 | how america lost its secrets
nections. Making the task even more risky, according to my Booz
Allen source, there were closed- circuit cameras. The only way he
could mitigate the risk of detection was by having someone help
him build this network.
Even if Snowden had managed to obtain all the necessary passwords
from colleagues, he would have had to transfer the files to an
external storage device. This was not a matter of simply attaching
a thumb drive or other external device to a port, because, unlike in
movies such as Mission: Impossible, the ports on the computers at
the NSA were ordinarily sealed shut. This measure was taken specifically
to prevent any unauthorized downloading by NSA workers.
The only people at the center who had the authorization, and the
means, to open these ports and transfer data were system administrators,
according to the former Booz Allen executive. System
administrators needed to have this privilege to deal with glitches
in the computers. Snowden was no longer a system administrator
and had no such privileges. So again, he would have needed help.
He would have needed to either borrow a system administrator’s
credential or forge his own.
The credential he would need is called a public key infrastructure,
or PKI, card with its authentication code embedded in a magnetic
strip. When I asked the former Booz Allen executive if Snowden
possessed the skill set to forge such a card, he said that he strongly
doubted any NSA employee would be capable of such a forgery
without special equipment. Just asking such a favor could “set off
alarms,” my source said.
The unwitting accomplice scenario had another stumbling block:
time. We know from Poitras that Snowden told her in early April
2013 that he planned to deliver documents to her in six to eight
weeks (which he in fact did). But he had not yet started working for
Booz Allen at the center until that same month. It does not seem
plausible that in making such a commitment he was merely counting
on his ingenuity in the face of strangers to fulfill it. The only way
he could have known for certain that he would be able to borrow a
PKI card and obtain the passwords, whether by trickery, by observation,
or by a key router, before he had begun working at the center
was that he already knew someone there who would help him.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 152
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Witting Accomplice Possibility
Did Snowden Act Alone? | 153
The witting accomplice scenario better fits with the principle in logic
called Occam’s razor, which suggests that when one is choosing
between alternative explanations, the one that requires the fewest
assumptions should be given priority. It would be relatively easy
to gain access to passwords if Snowden had the cooperation of an
insider at the center who had been read into the compartments or,
even better, if he had the cooperation of a system administrator with
the necessary PKI cards and shell keys to bypass the password protection.
Such an accomplice could also help explain how Snowden
was able to get the job at the center in the first place, how he knew
in advance that he could find there the “lists” of the NSA sources in
foreign countries, and how he knew that there were security traps at
the center. Such a witting accomplice might even have prepared in
advance the “spiders” that Snowden used to index the files.
The witting accomplice scenario of course requires an unsettling
expansion of the plot. It means Snowden collaborated with one or
more insiders at the center to steal secret documents. It is not difficult
to imagine, in light of the lax background checks for outside
contractors servicing the NSA, that there were others in the “geek
squad” who shared Snowden’s antipathy to NSA surveillance. Certainly,
we know that Snowden found other NSA workers who were
willing to attend his anti- surveillance CryptoParty in December
2012. Some might be willing to offer Snowden help if he was willing
to go public. Indeed, if the geek culture produced one Snowden, why
wouldn’t it produce others? If such an accomplice lacked Snowden’s
willingness to flee to another country, he might have limited his participation
to supplying technical assistance. For his part, Snowden
might have agreed to divert suspicion from his accomplice by taking
sole responsibility for the crime when he went public.
All of this is theoretically possible, but no witting accomplice was
ever identified. The FBI, which was in charge of the domestic part of
the investigation of the Snowden case, questioned all of Snowden’s
co- workers at the center over the course of six months and failed
to find anyone who knowingly helped Snowden. If the accomplice
was an idealistic amateur, it is likely the FBI would have found him.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 153
9/29/16 5:51 PM
154 | how america lost its secrets
Three co- workers did admit to the FBI, as noted earlier, that they
might have inadvertently given Snowden their passwords, but these
three slips would not account for Snowden’s breach of all the other
compartments. Of course, there might have also been less forthcoming
co- workers who hid their slips in divulging their passwords to
Snowden.
This raises the more sinister possibility that the accomplice
was not an amateur co- worker but a spy who was already in place
when Snowden arrived. Such a penetration agent could have been
recruited by an adversary intelligence service before Snowden came
on the scene. After Snowden expressed a desire to expose the NSA’s
domestic surveillance, it could then have used him as an “umbrella”
to hide its own activities. Finding such a means to protect a source
while exploiting his or her information is not uncommon in espionage
operations, and because Snowden was willing to flee America
and go public, he could serve as a near- perfect umbrella. “Snowden
may have carried out of the NSA many more documents than he
knew about,” Tyler Drumheller, the former CIA station chief, said. It
could also account for the disparity between the claims of Snowden
and the NSA damage assessment as to the number of documents
that were compromised.
As far- fetched as this scenario may seem, less than three years
before the Snowden breach the NSA had received a warning from
a CIA mole (to be discussed in greater detail later) that the Russian
intelligence service might have recruited a KGB mole at the Fort
Meade headquarters of the NSA. No mole was found in 2010, and
if one existed, it could not have been Snowden, who was working
for the NSA in Japan in 2010. Such a putative mole could conceivably
have acquired enough information to later facilitate Snowden’s
operation.
As Snowden acknowledges, he was not a happy worker at the
NSA. He complained in his posts over the Internet between 2010
and 2013 about superiors and what he considered NSA abuses to
co- workers. If someone assumed the guise of a reluctant whistleblower,
he would have little difficulty in approaching Snowden.
Snowden might not even know his true affiliation beyond that he
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 154
9/29/16 5:51 PM
Did Snowden Act Alone? | 155
shared Snowden’s anti- surveillance views. If Snowden then voiced
an interest in exposing the NSA’s secrets, this person could supply
him with the necessary guidance, steering a still- unsuspecting
Snowden first to the Booz Allen position and afterward to his associates
in Hong Kong. By taking sole credit for the coup in the video
that he made with Poitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong, he acted, as
he told Greenwald, to divert suspicion from anyone else. This move
could also give any collaborator he might have had in Hawaii time
to cover his or her tracks.
The astronomer Carl Sagan famously said in regard to searching
the universe for signals from other civilizations that the “absence
of evidence is not evidence of absence.” That injunction also applies
to the spooky universe of espionage. The fact that a mole hunt fails
to find a hidden collaborator at the NSA does not necessarily mean
such a mole does not exist. Historically, we have many notable cases
in which Russian moles eluded long, intensive investigations. Robert
Hanssen penetrated the FBI for over twenty years for the KGB
without being caught. Similarly, Aldrich Ames acted as a KGB mole
in the CIA for more than ten years and passed all the CIA’s sophisticated
lie detector tests. Both Hanssen and Ames eluded intensive FBI
and CIA investigations that lasted over a decade. According to Victor
Cherkashin, their KGB case officer, whom I interviewed in Moscow
in 2015, the KGB was able to hide their existence from investigators
for such a long period partly because of the widespread belief in U.S.
intelligence that moles were fictional creatures that sprang from the
“paranoid mind” of James Jesus Angleton. When I then cited the
signature line from the movie The Usual Suspects, “The greatest
trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist,”
Cherkashin thinly smiled and said, “CIA denial [of moles] certainly
helped.”
In view of such past successes of the Russian intelligence services,
it cannot be precluded that there was another person in the NSA
working with the enthusiastic Snowden as cover to prevent any light
from falling on his own surreptitious spying. While it may seem
extremely unlikely that Snowden had such assistance, the alternative
scenario, that Snowden broke into the sealed compartments and
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 155
9/29/16 5:51 PM
156 | how america lost its secrets
made off with the documents without any assistance, seems equally
unlikely.
Even if Snowden had been, as he claims, a pure idealist seeking
to right a perceived wrong, it does not exclude the possibility
of his becoming entangled in the plots of others. Intelligence services
make it their business to bring about such witting or unwitting
entanglements.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 156
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 16
The Question of When
The NSA was actually concerned back in the time of the cryptowars
with improving American security. Nowadays, we see that
their priority is weakening our security.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2015
In his 1974 novel, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, John Le Carré
helped establish the concept in the public imagination of a mole
burrowing into a rival intelligence service. Le Carré’s now-classic
mole, code- named Gerald by the KGB, managed in the novel to gain
access to the inner sanctum of the British intelligence service MI6.
Aided and guided by his controllers in Moscow, he systematically
stole British intelligence secrets. As Le Carré wove the plot, the brilliantly
orchestrated operation involved spotting, compromising, and
recruiting others to gradually advance Gerald the mole to a position
of power. Such well- organized penetrations are not limited to fiction.
The career of the KGB mole Heinz Felfe, who was advanced through
the ranks of West German intelligence by an elaborate series of sacrifices
by his controllers in Moscow until he actually headed West
German counterintelligence in 1961, could have served as the nonfiction
inspiration for Le Carré’s 1963 novel, The Spy Who Came
in from the Cold. As U.S. intelligence only found out after the Cold
War ended, the KGB also had the ability to sustain moles for decades.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 157
9/29/16 5:51 PM
158 | how america lost its secrets
The CIA also had its share of long- term successes, such as Alexander
Poteyev, who fed the CIA secrets for over ten years while
burrowing into Russian intelligence. In the choreography of these
operations, as in Le Carré’s fiction, rival intelligence services ensnared
and sacrificed recruits, as if playing a chess game, to advance their
moles. Despite notable successes such as Felfe and Poteyev, a great
number of these elaborate conspiracies fail to insinuate a mole into
their adversaries’ confidence. Intelligence services therefore also
take advantage of a more prosaic source: the self- generated spy, or,
as they are called in the trade, a “walk- in.”
Although they are largely unsung in novels, these walk- ins are an
important part of espionage. A counterespionage review done for the
Presidential Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) in 1990
found that most U.S. spies in the Cold War had taken documents on
their own volition and only afterward offered them to an adversary
service. Self- generated spies have diverse motives. Some intelligence
workers steal secrets for financial gain. Others take them to further
an ideological interest. As opportunistic enterprises, intelligence services
do not turn walk- ins away if they have valuable intelligence.
Indeed, some of the most successful moles were not recruited, or even
controlled, by spy agencies. They were self- generated penetrations,
or “espionage sources,” as the KGB preferred to call them, who first
stole secrets and later voluntarily delivered them to an adversary.
Hanssen, who successfully penetrated the FBI for the Russian
intelligence services from 1979 to 2001, according to the assessment
of a 2002 presidential commission, had caused “the worst intelligence
disaster in US history.” Eleven years later, George Ellard, a
former NSA inspector general who had been a member of that commission,
compared Hanssen with Snowden “in that they both used
very well- honed IT abilities to steal and disclose classified information
vital to our national security.”
It is also possible to exploit a walk- in even after he has left his
service. For example, the KGB major Anatoliy Golitsyn was an ideological
self- generated spy who walked into the U.S. embassy in Helsinki
on December 15, 1961. He asked to see the CIA officer on duty
and announced to him that he had collected a trove of KGB secrets,
including information that could identify its key spies in the West.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 158
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Question of When | 159
He offered to defect to the United States. The CIA accepted his offer,
and through this archive of secrets he had previously compiled, he
became one of the CIA’s most productive sources in the Cold War.
The job of an intelligence service is to take advantage of whatever
opportunities come its way in the form of self- generated spies. If
a Russian walk- in had not yet burned his bridges to his own service,
U.S. intelligence officers were under instructions to attempt to
persuade the walk- in to return to his post in Russia and serve as a
“defector- in- place,” or mole. “While defectors can and do provide
critical information,” a CIA memorandum on walk- ins during the
Cold War noted, “there are very few cases in which the same individual
may not have been of greater value if he had returned to his
post.” Of course, if a walk- in believed he was already compromised,
as Golitsyn did, a decision would have to be made whether the value
of his intelligence merited exfiltrating him to the United States.
This required evaluating the bona fides of the walk- in. Not all
walk- ins are accepted as defectors. Some walk- ins are deemed “dangles,”
or agents dispatched by the KGB to test and confuse the CIA.
Others are rejected as political liabilities, as happened to Wang Lijun,
a well- connected police chief in China. In February 2012, Wang
walked into the U.S. consulate in Chengdu asking for asylum. The
State Department decided against it. After Wang left U.S. protection,
he was arrested for corruption and received a fifteen- year prison
sentence. Such decisions about walk- ins are not made without due
consideration, often at the highest level of a government, because
exfiltrating a defector can result in diplomatic ruptures and political
embarrassments.
Conversely, it raises espionage concerns when an adversary government
authorizes the exfiltration of a rogue employee of an intelligence
service. At minimum, it suggests that a rival government
placed value on what the defector could provide it. The Snowden
case is no exception. Whatever Snowden’s prior relations might have
been with Russia, it can be assumed that after he fled to Moscow,
in light of the intelligence value of the stolen documents, he would
wind up in the hands of the Russian security services. That assumption
was reinforced by subsequent countermeasures that were
implemented by adversaries moved to block secret sources of NSA
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 159
9/29/16 5:51 PM
160 | how america lost its secrets
surveillance, as the CIA deputy director later revealed. Such moves
could indicate that at least part of the U.S. communications intelligence
that Snowden had stolen was in enemy hands. The CIA and
NSA’s monitoring of these countermeasures was itself extremely
delicate, because revealing what they learned about Russian and
Chinese countermeasures risked compromising even more U.S.
communications sources than had Snowden.
General Alexander said in his interview with The Australian
Financial Review, “We absolutely need to know what Russia’s
involvement is with Snowden.” He further said, “I think Snowden
is now being manipulated by Russian intelligence. I just don’t know
when that exactly started.” At what point did Snowden first come in
contact with the Russians? The counterintelligence issue was not if
this U.S. intelligence defector in Moscow was under Russian control
but when he came under it.
There were three possible time periods when Snowden might
have been brought under control by the Russian intelligence service:
while he was still working for the NSA; after he arrived in Hong
Kong on May 20, 2013; or after he arrived in Russia on June 23,
2013.
The NSA Scenario
The first scenario could stretch as far back as when Snowden was
forced out of the CIA in 2009. It will be recalled that the CIA had
planned to launch a security investigation of Snowden, but it was
aborted when he resigned. He had also incurred large losses speculating
in the financial markets in Geneva, which is the kind of activity
that had in the past attracted the interest of foreign intelligence
services. So it has to be considered in this scenario that Snowden had
been recruited by the Russians after he left the CIA and directed to
take jobs at civilian contractors servicing the NSA.
Such “career management,” as it is called by the CIA, could
explain why Snowden had switched jobs in March 2013 to Booz
Allen Hamilton, which, unlike his previous employer, Dell, allowed
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 160
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Question of When | 161
him to gain proximity to the super-secret lists of the telecommunications
systems that the NSA had penetrated in Russia and China.
This could account for how he managed to acquire the necessary
passwords to accrue privileged information. It could also account for
why the documents he copied that pertained to NSA operations in
Russia were not among those he gave to Poitras, Greenwald, and
other journalists. Because Russia has had an active intelligencesharing
treaty with China since 1996, it could further explain why
his first stop was Hong Kong, a part of China. It was a safe venue for
debriefing Snowden, as well as establishing his credentials among
journalists as a whistle- blower, before a decision was made to allow
him to proceed to Russia.
The nearly fatal problem with this early recruitment scenario is
Snowden’s contacts with journalists. Snowden, it will be recalled,
had contacted Greenwald in December 2012. Greenwald was a highprofile
blogger in Brazil who did not use encryption or any security
safeguards. Next, he contacted Poitras in January 2013 in Berlin;
she was a magnet for NSA dissidents. Both of these contacts put
Snowden’s clandestine downloading at grave risk. As known opponents
of U.S. intelligence agencies, these journalists might be, as they
themselves suspected they were, under surveillance by American,
British, Brazilian, or German intelligence services. Greenwald and
Poitras might also tell others who were either under surveillance or
informers. So no matter what precautions Snowden took, his secret
enterprise, or just the fact he was in contact with anti- government
activists, might be detected. At minimum, he could lose his access to
secrets and be of no further use as a source at the NSA. He could also
be interrogated and reveal the way he was brought under control. If
Snowden had actually been under the control of the Russian intelligence
service, the last thing it would allow was for him to take such
a risk— or even to contact a single journalist. After all, the purpose
of an espionage operation is to steal secrets without alerting anyone
to the theft.
A former CIA officer told me that while anything could “go haywire”
in an intelligence operation, it would be “unthinkable” that
the Russian intelligence service would permit an undercover source
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 161
9/29/16 5:51 PM
162 | how america lost its secrets
it controlled in the NSA to expose himself by contacting journalists.
Snowden’s continued interactions with Poitras and Greenwald make
it implausible that he was under Russian control before he went to
Hong Kong.
The Hong Kong Scenario
The most compelling support for the scenario that Snowden was
brought under Russian control while he was in Hong Kong comes, it
will be recalled, from Vladimir Putin. His disclosure about the case
leaves little doubt that Russian officials had engaged Snowden in
Hong Kong, that Putin had authorized his trip to Moscow, and that
the Russian government allowed him to fly to Moscow without a
Russian visa. We know that Putin’s version is supported by U.S. surveillance
of Snowden’s activities in Hong Kong. We also know that
the Russians went to some lengths not only to facilitate his trip to
Moscow but to arrange to keep him in Russia. This supports the
possibility that the Russian intelligence service managed to bring
Snowden under its sway during his thirty- four days in Hong Kong.
The Russian intelligence service might even have been aware
of Snowden and his anti- NSA activities before his arrival on May
20. Snowden was anything but discreet in his contacts with strangers
in the anti- surveillance movement, including such well- known
activists as Runa Sandvik (to whom he revealed his true name and
address via e- mail), Micah Lee, Jacob Appelbaum, Parker Higgins,
and Laura Poitras. “It is not statistically improbable that members of
this circle were being watched by a hostile service,” a former NSA
counterintelligence officer told me in 2015. When I told him that
Poitras and others in her circle had used PGP encryption, aliases,
and Tor software in their exchanges with Snowden, he said, arching
his eyebrows, “That might work against amateurs, but it wouldn’t
stop the Russians if they thought they might have a defector in the
NSA.” He explained that both the NSA and hostile services have the
“means” to bypass such safeguards.
I asked what the Russian intelligence service would have done if
it had indeed spotted Snowden in late 2012 or early 2013. “Maybe
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 162
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Question of When | 163
just research him,” he replied. As we know now, he pointed out, Russia
and China probably had access to the 127- page standard form in
his personnel file that he updated in 2011. They also had the capability
to track his air travel to Hong Kong. “Could someone have
steered him to Hong Kong?” I asked. He answered, with a shrug,
“That depends on whether Snowden had a confidante who could
have influenced him.”
Whenever adversaries became aware of Snowden in this scenario,
it was not until after he copied the NSA secrets and took them with
him to Hong Kong that Russian intelligence officers offered him a
deal. So from the Russian point of view, Snowden had already burned
his bridges. Because he had used other people’s passwords and access
privileges to get into computers that he was not authorized to use,
illegally moved documents, and given a false reason for his medical
leave, it was only a matter of time, as he told Greenwald in his
interview in Hong Kong, before NSA investigators would identify
him as a possible spy. He could be of no further use at the NSA to an
adversary. His intelligence value now lay in the documents he had
taken with him or stored in the cloud as well as his ability to help
clarify them in debriefing sessions. He could also inflict damage on
the morale and public standing of the NSA by denouncing its spying
in the media.
Once Snowden was in Hong Kong, the Russians would have no
reason to restrain him from holding a press event or releasing a
video. In fact, the KGB had organized press conferences for all the
previous NSA defectors to Moscow. Hong Kong was a perfect venue
for a well- staged media event because all the major newspapers in
the world had bureaus there. Snowden’s disclosures about NSA spying
could serve to weaken the NSA’s relations with its allies.
It is also possible that Russian or Chinese intelligence did not
become aware of Snowden until after he went public in June by
having The Guardian release his video. The video would have convinced
the Russians or the Chinese of how dissatisfied Snowden was
with the NSA. Because dissatisfaction is one of the classic means of
recruitment in the intelligence business, he would certainly become
a prime target for recruitment after he went public.
The CIA also considered the possibility that Snowden might
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 163
9/29/16 5:51 PM
164 | how america lost its secrets
have been reeled in unwittingly. Morell suggested in his book that
Snowden might not himself have fully realized “when and how he
would be used.”
It can be safely assumed that the decision made by Putin’s intelligence
service to allow Snowden to travel to Russia proceeded from
something other than softhearted sentiment about his welfare. After
Putin learned that there was an American in Hong Kong from the
“special services” seeking to come to Russia, he also learned from
Snowden’s own disclosure on the video released that Snowden had
taken a large number of NSA documents to Hong Kong: indeed,
some were shown on the video. After that self- outing by Snowden,
Putin had plenty of time to calculate the advantages and disadvantages
of allowing him to come to Moscow.
Putin could offer him not only freedom from arrest but also a
platform to express his views. The exploitation of an intelligence
defector, even after he yields his secrets, can be the final stage of
a successful intelligence operation. The CIA considered one of its
greatest coups of the Cold War its release of the espionage- acquired
secret speech of Nikita Khrushchev to the Communist Party of the
Soviet Union in 1956 exposing the transgressions of the previous
regime of Joseph Stalin. Making public these deeds was meant by
the CIA to sow discord both inside the Soviet Union and to disrupt
its relations with its allies. General Alexander suggested that Putin
might similarly be “looking to capitalize on the fact that [Snowden’s]
actions are enormously disruptive and damaging to US interests.”
This potential gain, if Alexander’s assessment is correct, provided
Putin with an additional reason to have his representatives in Hong
Kong offer Snowden exfiltration.
Snowden was in no position to refuse. After the release of the
video, there was no going back to America without his facing a
determined criminal prosecution. He would have known that in
almost every prior case intelligence workers who had intentionally
released even a single classified document had gone to prison. As his
Internet postings show, he had closely followed the ordeal of Bradley
Manning, whose trial was coming to its conclusion while Snowden
was in Hong Kong. Manning had been kept in solitary confinement
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 164
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Question of When | 165
under horrific conditions for over a year while awaiting his trial and
was facing a long prison sentence. There was no reason for Snowden
to expect a better outcome for himself if he returned to the United
States or was arrested anywhere else that had an extradition treaty
with the United States. As the Russian officials in Hong Kong would
have informed him, Russia had no extradition treaty with the United
States. It was also one of the few places in the world that he could
reach from Hong Kong without flying through airspace in which he
might be intercepted by a U.S. ally. Snowden was told he could take
the direct Aeroflot flight to Moscow without a valid passport or visa.
That Snowden’s alternative to going to Russia was going to prison
gave the Russians considerable leverage in Hong Kong. The Russian
“diplomats” could have used this leverage to extract a quid pro
quo. The price of admission might have meant putting himself in the
hands of Russian intelligence and telling it all he knew.
The Moscow Scenario
The final possibility is that Snowden did not come under Russian
control until after he arrived in Moscow. After assessing the negative
attitude that Snowden expressed toward government authority
on the video that was released by The Guardian, the Russian “diplomats”
in Hong Kong might have concluded that Snowden could bolt
if too much pressure was exerted on him there. The Russians could
afford to be patient. They knew that Interpol and the United States
would be pursuing Snowden throughout the world and that he had
no valid travel documents and that his credit cards had been frozen.
They would likely know that Sarah Harrison had arranged his flight
to Moscow on June 23. So they had no urgent need to apply pressure
on him before his plane landed in Russia.
After the Russians took him in a “special operation” from the
plane at the airport, he was informed by Russian authorities that
he would not be allowed to go to Cuba, Venezuela, Iceland, Ecuador,
or any other country without the permission of Russian officials,
which would not be immediately forthcoming. He was now at the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 165
9/29/16 5:51 PM
166 | how america lost its secrets
mercy of the Russian authorities. There was good reason for keeping
him in a virtual prison in Russia. “He can compromise thousands
of intelligence and military officials,” Sergei Alexandrovich Markov,
the co- chairman of the National Strategic Council of Russia and an
adviser to Putin, pointed out. “We can’t send him back just because
America demands it.”
So Snowden was consigned to the transit zone of the airport,
which is a twilight zone neither inside nor outside Russia, a netherworld
that extends beyond the confines of the airport to include safe
houses and other facilities maintained by the FSB for the purposes
of interrogation and security. Stranded at the Moscow airport, no
matter what he had believed earlier in Hong Kong, Snowden would
quickly realize that he had only one viable option: seeking protection
in Russia.
Even though the FSB is known by U.S. intelligence to strictly
control the movements and contacts of former members of foreign
intelligence services in Russia, Snowden might not have realized the
full extent of the FSB’s interest in him. He naively told The Washington
Post in December 2013, in Moscow, “I am still working for
the NSA right now. They are the only ones who don’t realize it.”
Whatever he might have been thinking, a former U.S. communications
intelligence worker who stole American state secrets, such as
Snowden, would be under the FSB’s scrutiny.
Andrei Soldatov, the co- author of the 2010 book The New Nobility:
The Restoration of Russia’s Security State and the Enduring
Legacy of the KGB, who was personally knowledgeable about
FSB procedures, explained the FSB would monitor “every facet of
Snowden’s communications, and his life.” General Oleg Kalugin,
who, as previously mentioned, defected from the KGB to the United
States in 1995, added that the FSB (following the standard operating
procedures of the KGB) would be “his hosts and they are taking care
of him.” Kalugin further said in 2014, “Whatever he had access to in
his former days at NSA, I believe he shared all of it with the Russians,
and they are very grateful.” This assessment was backed by Frants
Klintsevich. As the first deputy chairman of the Kremlin’s defense
and security committee at the time of Snowden’s defection, he was
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 166
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Question of When | 167
in a position to know Snowden’s contribution. “Let’s be frank,” he
said in a taped interview with NPR (in Russian), “Snowden did share
intelligence. This is what security services do. If there’s a possibility
to get information, they will get it.”
Even without Klintsevich’s comments, top American intelligence
officers had little doubt that the Russian security services would do
their job. Michael Hayden, for example, who in succession headed
three American intelligence services, was certainly in a position to
appreciate the capabilities of the Russian and Chinese intelligence
services. He told me in 2014 that he saw no other possibility than
that Snowden would be induced to cooperate in this situation, saying,
“I would lose all respect for the Russian and Chinese security
services if they haven’t fully exploited everything Snowden had to
give.” They certainly had that opportunity when Snowden spent
almost six weeks at Sheremetyevo International Airport. The FSB
controlled his access to food, lodgings, the Internet, and whatever
else he needed to survive there. If he did not cooperate, the FSB
could also return him to the United States, where in the eyes of the
Department of Justice he had betrayed the United States by stealing
secrets and taking them abroad. What recourse did Snowden have?
In a word, the FSB held all the cards but one— Snowden’s help with
the stolen documents. Even if Snowden disliked the tactics of the
Russian security services, he now had a powerful inducement not to
decline the requests of the Russian authorities.
Two weeks after his arrival, the Russian authorities provided him
with a convenient path to full cooperation with Russia. He was put
in contact with Anatoly Grigorievich Kucherena, a silver- haired,
fifty- two- year- old lawyer who is known to be a personal friend of
Putin’s. Kucherena did tasks for Putin’s party in the Russian parliament,
or Duma. He had excellent connections in the Russian security
apparatus because he served on the oversight committee of the
FSB. Kucherena offered to serve as Snowden’s pro bono lawyer. On
July 12, Snowden officially retained him as his legal representative in
Moscow. In explaining the relationship, Kucherena said, “Officially,
he is my client, but at the same time, I provide a number of other
services to him.” According to Kucherena, Snowden turned down
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 167
9/29/16 5:51 PM
168 | how america lost its secrets
all requests to meet with any representative of the U.S. embassy in
Moscow. From that point on, he would act as Snowden’s go- between
with the FSB and other Russian agencies.
At the outset, Kucherena made it clear to Snowden that he would
have to play by Moscow’s rules before the Kremlin would grant him
permission to stay in Russia. To begin with, Snowden had to withdraw
any applications he had made elsewhere for asylum. He had to
put his fate entirely in the hands of Putin’s Russia. He would also
have to be fully candid with the Russian authorities on what was of
great value to Putin: the secret documents he had acquired.
Eighteen days later, Snowden received Russian identification
papers that allowed him to resettle in Moscow. He was provided
with a residence and allowed to set up a broadcasting studio in it
that he could use for Internet appearances at well- attended events
around the world, such as South by Southwest and TED. Snowden
was, according to Kucherena, also furnished with bodyguards. To
help earn his keep, he was said by Kucherena to be employed at an
unidentified Moscow cyber- security firm. To complete his resettlement,
Lindsay Mills, whom he had left behind in Hawaii, was given
a three- month visa and was allowed to temporarily live with him in
Moscow. This afforded him a lifestyle that Snowden described in an
interview as “great.”
It would strain credibility that such privileges would be awarded to
an intelligence defector who had refused to cooperate with Russian
authorities. In Snowden’s case, he was even allowed to participate in
Putin’s telethon on state- controlled television. On it, he was called
on to ask Putin if the Russian government violated the privacy of
Russian citizens in the same way that the American government
violated the rights of its citizens. Putin, smiling at Snowden’s presumably
vetted question, answered in a single word: “No.”
In the Moscow scenario, the Russians acted to advance their interests.
They gave Snowden sanctuary, support, perks, and high- level
treatment because he agreed to cooperate with them. If Snowden
had not paid this basic price of admission, either in Russia or before
his arrival, he would not have been accorded this privileged status.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 168
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 17
The Keys to the Kingdom
Are Missing
There’s a zero percent chance the Russians or Chinese have
received any documents.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2013
A
critical missing piece in the Snowden enigma is the whereabouts
of the NSA documents. Greenwald told the Associated
Press that the documents that Snowden had taken from the NSA
constituted “the instruction manual for how the NSA is built” and
that they “would allow somebody who read them to know exactly
how the NSA does what it does, which would in turn allow them to
evade that surveillance or replicate it.” Snowden, for his part, said on
camera in his Hong Kong interview in June 2013 that NSA investigators
would have “a heart attack” when they discovered the extent
of the breach.
Ledgett, the NSA official who had conducted the damage assessment,
while not having a heart attack, confirmed that Snowden had
taken a massive number of documents and among them was what
he deemed the NSA’s “keys to the kingdom.” These keys could presumably
open up the mechanism through which the United States
learns about the secret activities of other nations and, by doing so,
bring down the American signals intelligence system that had for
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 169
9/29/16 5:51 PM
170 | how america lost its secrets
sixty years monitored government communications. It had also kept
track of adversaries’ missile telemetry, submarine movements, and
nuclear proliferation.
The Snowden breach was not without precedent at the NSA.
There had been two Russian spies at the NSA during the Cold
War, Jack Dunlap and David Sheldon Boone, who took a limited
number of documents, but no one since the end of the Cold War
is known to have taken a single NSA classified document. Now an
insider had removed a vast number of the NSA’s documents. Many
of these documents were classified TS/SCI— “Top Secret, Sensitive
Compartmented Information”— which, as NSA secrets went, were
deemed the gold standard of espionage because they revealed the
sources used in communications intelligence. Whatever the assessment
of Snowden’s motivation, the single question that needed to be
answered was, what happened to these stolen files?
Recall the huge disparity between the number of documents that
the NSA calculated that Snowden compromised and the number of
documents he is known to have handed over to journalists in Hong
Kong on a thumb drive. When the House and Senate Intelligence
Committees asked the NSA how many documents Snowden took,
the NSA could not come up with a definitive number despite having
employed a world- class team of experts to reconstruct the crime. The
NSA could say that 1.7 million documents had been selected in two
dozen NSA computers during Snowden’s brief tenure at Booz Allen
in 2013, including documents from the Department of Defense, the
NSA, and the CIA. Of these “touched” documents, some 1.3 million
had been copied and moved to another computer.
There was evidence that Snowden had used preprogrammed spiders
to find and index the documents. He had said that he took the
job at Booz Allen to get access to data that he copied. So as far as the
NSA was concerned, of course, the 1.3 million documents he copied
and moved were considered compromised. On top of this haul,
Snowden had copied files while working at Dell in 2012. As a system
administrator there, he could download data without leaving a
digital trail. As previously mentioned, more than half the documents
actually published in newspapers had been taken during Snowden’s
time at Dell.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 170
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 171
Snowden’s supporters do not accept that he stole such a large number
of documents. According to Greenwald, the NSA vastly exaggerated
the magnitude of the theft in order to “demonize” Snowden.
Snowden also disputed the magnitude of the 1.7 million number. He
told James Bamford of Wired in early 2014 that he took far fewer
than the 1.7 million documents that the NSA reported were compromised.
He offered, however, no more specific details on the magnitude
of his theft. Nor did he offer Bamford any way to verify his
assertion other than to say that he had purposely left behind “a trail
of digital bread crumbs” at the NSA base in Hawaii so that the NSA
could determine which documents he “touched” but did not download.
A government official familiar with the investigation said no
such “bread crumbs” were found by the NSA.
It is possible that the NSA Damage Assessment team under Ledgett
falsified its findings or otherwise inflated the number of documents
that Snowden stole. NSA executives might have also lied
to Congress to exaggerate the loss. But why would these officials
engage in an orchestrated deception that made them look bad? Exaggerating
the magnitude of the theft would only magnify Ledgett and
the NSA’s failure in its mission to protect U.S. secrets.
Officials had no reason to demonize Snowden for legal reasons.
He already had been. Greenwald and Poitras had already revealed
that Snowden had given them a vast number of NSA classified documents
on a thumb drive that revealed, as Greenwald put it, the “blueprints”
of the NSA. This drive contained, it will be recalled, no fewer
than 58,000 highly classified documents. In the eyes of the law, that
constituted an unprecedented breach of the laws passed to protect
communications intelligence. In any case, in Russia Snowden was
not in any jeopardy, no matter how many documents he was said to
have stolen. Interestingly, the thirty- five- page Defense Intelligence
Agency’s damage assessment reports that 900,000 Pentagon documents
compromised by Snowden were not made public. That was
only disclosed via a Vice magazine Freedom of Information request
in June 2015.
Many of the putative 1.3 million documents that the NSA says
were copied and moved were duplicate copies. Others were outdated
or otherwise useless routing data. So the quantity does not tell the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 171
9/29/16 5:51 PM
172 | how america lost its secrets
whole story. Of far more importance is the quality of some of the
data that Snowden had copied. Just a single one of these documents
could cripple not just the NSA but America’s entire multibilliondollar
apparatus for intercepting foreign intelligence. The previously
cited road map, which was thirty- one thousand pages long, listed
critical gaps in U.S. coverage of China, Russia, and other adversaries,
including those cited by President Obama’s national security team.
It was not found among the files on the thumb drive given to Poitras
and Greenwald. Nor were most of the missing Level 3 lists concerning
NSA activities in Russia and China found on the thumb drive,
even though Snowden said he had taken his final job at Booz Allen
to get access to these lists. If Snowden had not given these documents
to Poitras, Greenwald, or other journalists, where were they?
The compartment logs showed that Snowden copied and transferred
these Level 3 documents in his final week at the NSA. He
presumably had them in his possession in Hong Kong when he
arrived on May 20. On June 3, according to Greenwald, Snowden
was still sorting through the documents to determine which ones
were appropriate to give to journalists. On June 12, he told the
reporter Lana Lam in Hong Kong that he was going through the
documents, country by country, to determine which additional ones
he should pass on to journalists. Eleven days later, he departed Hong
Kong for Moscow carrying at least one laptop computer. After arriving
in Moscow, he suggested he still had NSA secrets in his possession.
“No intelligence service— not even our own— has the capacity
to compromise the secrets I continue to protect,” he wrote to the
former senator Gordon Humphrey. “I cannot be coerced into revealing
that information, even under torture.” Much of the material he
copied while working at Booz Allen remained, as far as the NSA
could determine, missing. Had he brought these files under his “protection”
to Russia?
An answer soon came from Snowden’s Moscow lawyer. On September
23, Anatoly Kucherena was extensively interviewed on the
RT channel in Russia. The interviewer, Sophie Shevardnadze, who
had a show called SophieCo, was a well- admired journalist. She is
the granddaughter of Eduard Shevardnadze, a former foreign minis-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 172
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 173
ter and Politburo member of the Soviet Union and, after the Soviet
Union broke up, the first president of Georgia. Even though she had
interviewed many top political figures in Russia, obtaining an hourlong
interview with Kucherena was a coup because, until then, he
had not discussed Snowden in a television interview.
About halfway through the interview, Shevardnadze brought
up the highly sensitive subject of the disposition of the NSA documents.
If anyone was in a position to know about these documents,
it was Kucherena. He had acted as an intermediary for Snowden
in his negotiations with Russian authorities, including the FSB. As
such, he would be privy to the status of the secret material that was
of interest to the Russian intelligence services. When I interviewed
Kucherena in Moscow in 2015, he told me that “all the reports” concerning
Snowden had been turned over to him by “Russian authorities”
in July 2013. “I had all of Snowden’s statements,” he said. If so,
he presumably knew what Snowden had told the Russian security
services.
Had Snowden come to Russia with empty hands or bearing gifts?
Shevardnadze directly asked Kucherena if Snowden had given all
the documents he had taken from the NSA to journalists in Hong
Kong. Kucherena answered her question without any evasion, saying
that Snowden had only given “some” of the NSA’s documents in
his possession to journalists in Hong Kong. He had kept the remaining
documents in his possession. That confirmed what Snowden had
told Greenwald, Poitras, and Lam in Hong Kong. Snowden told them
that he had divided the stolen NSA documents into two separate sets
of documents. One set he gave to Poitras and Greenwald on thumb
drives. The other set, which he told them he considered too sensitive
for these journalists, he retained for himself. U.S. investigators
at the NSA, the CIA, and the Department of Defense would like to
know what Snowden did with the set of documents he had retained
for himself and had not shared with the journalists in Hong Kong.
Shevardnadze, who makes it a point to drill her interviewees,
pressed Kucherena as to whether Snowden still had these NSA files,
or “material,” in Russia. The dialogue went as follows (from the
transcript supplied to me by Shevardnadze).
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 173
9/29/16 5:51 PM
174 | how america lost its secrets
shevardnadze: So he [Snowden] does have some materials that
haven’t been made public yet?
kucherena: Certainly.
Shevardnadze asked the next logical question: “Why did Russia
get involved in this whole thing if it got nothing out of it?”
“Snowden spent quite a few years working for the CIA. We haven’t
fully realized yet the importance of his revelations.” Kucherena was
on the FSB’s public oversight board. He was clearly in the picture.
Kucherena’s answer was completely consistent with the statement
Snowden made three weeks after arriving in Russia in his previously
mentioned e- mail to Senator Humphrey.
It is certainly possible that Snowden transferred the NSA files
from his own computers and thumb drives to storage on a remote
server in the cloud before coming to Russia. The “cloud” is actually
not in the sky but a term used for remote storage servers, such as
those provided by Dropbox, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and other
Internet companies. Anyone who is connected to the Internet can
store and retrieve files by entering a user name and a password.
For Kucherena to be certain Snowden had access to the so- farunrevealed
data, Snowden must have demonstrated his access either
to him or to the authorities. The Russians obviously knew Snowden
had the means to retrieve this data one way or the other. Because the
data concerned electronic espionage against Russia, the FSB would
have been keen to obtain the documents, and the FSB is not known
to take no for an answer in issues involving espionage.
Even if Snowden refused to furnish his key encryption, according
to a former National Security Council staffer, the Russian cyber
service in 2013 had the means, the time, and the incentive to break
the encryption. It is unlikely it would have had to go through the
trouble. It doesn’t take a great stretch of the imagination to conclude
that, willingly or under duress, Snowden shared his access to his
treasure trove of documents with the agencies that were literally in
control of his life in Russia.
Kucherena’s answer on the television program may also help to
explain Putin’s decision to allow Snowden to come to Moscow. It
was not a minor sacrifice for Putin. His foreign minister, Sergei Lav-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 174
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 175
rov, had spent almost six months negotiating with Hillary Clinton’s
State Department a one- on- one summit between President Obama
and President Putin. Not only would this summit be a diplomatic
coup for Russia, but also it would add to Putin’s personal credibility
in advance of the Olympic Games in Russia. In mid- June, after
U.S. intelligence reported to Obama’s national security adviser that
Snowden was in contact with Russian officials in Hong Kong, the
State Department explicitly told Lavrov that allowing Snowden
to defect to Russia would be viewed by President Obama as a blatantly
unfriendly act. As such, it could (and did) lead to the cancellation
of the planned summit. Putin knew the downside of admitting
Snowden.
But if Snowden had a large archive of files containing the sources
of the NSA’s electronic interceptions, as Snowden claimed he had in
Hong Kong, there was an enormous potential intelligence upside.
Putin had to choose between the loss of an Obama summit and
an intelligence coup. Would Putin have made the choice he did if
Snowden had destroyed, or refused to share, the stolen data?
“No country, not even the United States, would grant sanctuary
to an intelligence defector who refused to be cooperative,” answered
a former CIA officer who had spent a decade dealing with Russian
intelligence defectors. “That’s not how it works.” If so, it seems plausible
to believe that, as Kucherena said, the documents Snowden
brought to Russia explain why Russia exfiltrated him from Hong
Kong and provided him with a safe haven.
The Quickly Changing Narrative
Three weeks after Kucherena’s appearance on Shevardnadze’s show,
on October 17, Snowden had his first interview exchange with a
journalist since his arrival in Russia. It was over the Internet with
James Risen of The New York Times, as noted earlier. Snowden now
asserted a very different narrative. The subsequent front- page story,
which carried the headline “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files
to Russia,” reported that Snowden claimed he gave all his documents
to journalists in Hong Kong and brought none of them to Russia. He
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 175
9/29/16 5:51 PM
176 | how america lost its secrets
also said that he was “100 percent” certain that no foreign intelligence
service had had access to them at any point during his journey
from Honolulu to Moscow. When I later asked Kucherena in Moscow
why Snowden changed his story in direct contradiction of what
Kucherena had stated, he said, “Wizner.”
He was referring to Ben Wizner, Snowden’s ACLU lawyer in
Washington, D.C. Wizner had joined the ACLU in August 2001
after graduating from NYU Law School and clerking for a federal
judge. At the ACLU, he became an effective foe of NSA surveillance.
“I had spent ten years before this [Snowden leak] trying to bring
lawsuits against the intelligence community,” he explained in an
interview with Forbes in 2014. Prior to the Snowden leak, he had
frequently been consulted by Poitras on government surveillance
issues (and appeared in Poitras’s 2010 documentary, The Oath). He
had also been engaged in a lawsuit aimed at exposing the NSA’s subpoenas
for Verizon records.
He had first learned about Snowden from Poitras in January
2013 while Snowden was still working for Dell at the NSA base in
Hawaii. At that time, Poitras did not know Snowden’s real name, but
she informed Wizner that she was in touch with a person identifying
himself as a senior officer in U.S. intelligence. (Poitras did not
know at that time that her source, Snowden, was lying to her about
his position.) Wizner also was shown e-mails by Poitras in which
Snowden said he had information about the government’s secret
domestic surveillance program. Wizner, according to Poitras, advised
her to stay in touch with this source.
On July 13, 2013, after Snowden asked for asylum in Russia,
Kucherena arranged an encrypted chat between Snowden and Wizner.
According to Wizner, Snowden asked him at the outset, “Do you
have standing now?” It was a question that suggested that Snowden
was aware that the ACLU needed to gain standing in federal court to
challenge the government’s alleged domestic surveillance. Up until
now, it was unsuccessful because it had no way to show it was a victim
of surveillance. The FISA order to Verizon, which Snowden had
taken had provided that standing to Wizner and the ACLU.
Aside from the opportunity Snowden offered the ACLU, Wizner
no doubt believed in the salutary benefit of Snowden’s revela-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 176
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 177
tions. When they discussed Snowden’s legal situation in America,
Snowden expressed an interest in obtaining some form of amnesty
from prosecution. Wizner was willing to attempt to explore making
a possible deal with the Department of Justice, but it would not be an
easy task, especially if Snowden had turned over NSA documents to
a foreign power.
Even to argue that Snowden was merely an NSA whistle- blower
presented a serious challenge for Wizner. The ACLU had been
involved with previous NSA whistle- blowers, but Snowden’s case
differed from those cases in important ways. Those whistle- blowers
had not intentionally taken any NSA documents. Snowden, on the
other hand, had not only taken a large number of NSA documents
but also released tens of thousands of these top secret files to journalists
based in Germany and Brazil, as well as to other unauthorized
recipients. In addition, the Whistleblower Protection Act, passed
by Congress in 1989, does not exempt an insider, such as Snowden,
who signs a secrecy oath from the legal consequences of disclosing
classified documents to journalists or other unauthorized people.
Consequently, getting some form of amnesty for Snowden required
bolstering his image as a person taking personal risks to fight for
America. But if Snowden had taken even a single top secret document
to Russia, it would strengthen the case in the court of public
opinion that he had stolen communications intelligence secrets with
the intent to damage the United States, which under the provisions
of federal law could be considered espionage. In this regard, Kucherena’s
disclosure was extremely damaging to Snowden’s position, and
Snowden had, after all, already found refuge in Russia. Snowden
had two options, according to Wizner, the “first is to be where he is
in Russia. And the second is to be in a maximum security prison cell,
cut off from the world.” These, of course, would be the options of
any espionage defector who fled to Russia.
One way to mitigate the damage was for Snowden to substitute
a new narrative. Wizner took it upon himself to screen potential
journalists and other outlets for Snowden. He told a reporter for
The New York Times that, except for Oliver Stone, all individuals
who have “met with Snowden have just gone through me, and
we’ve hooked it up.” Nor did he limit his extraordinary control to
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 177
9/30/16 11:09 AM
178 | how america lost its secrets
interviews. In the case of Stone’s movie Snowden, Wizner asked for
the right to veto any shots featuring Snowden in the film. In it, he
would tell handpicked journalists that he had given all his documents
to Poitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong and took none of
them to Russia. Wizner could then argue that documents such as the
FISA court order were improperly classified secret and that disclosing
them served the public good. The government might not be able
to contest his claim without further revealing NSA sources. Under
these circumstances, it might be induced to agree to a plea bargain
for Snowden. Changing the narrative would also help enhance his
public image as a whistle- blower.
Snowden’s new narrative that he had destroyed all the documents
he had in his possession before coming to Moscow and had no access
to any NSA documents, not even those that he had distributed to
journalists, was reinforced in a series of interviews that Wizner
helped arrange. “I went the first six months without giving an interview,”
Snowden later said. “It wasn’t until December 2013 that I
gave my first interview to Barton Gellman.” (Snowden did not count
his Internet exchange with Risen in October as an “interview”.)
In late December 2013, Snowden met with Barton Gellman. It was
his first face- to- face meeting with a journalist since he had arrived in
Russia in June. Snowden turned his laptop toward Gellman and, as
if proving his point, said to him, “There’s nothing on it. . . . My hard
drive is completely blank.” That his computer had no files stored on
it at that moment of course meant very little. Just six weeks earlier,
Snowden had met with the former CIA officer Ray McGovern, who
had been invited to meet him in Moscow along with three other
American whistle- blowers. At that meeting, he told McGovern that
he had stored all the NSA data he had taken on external hard drives.
Gellman asked about the precise whereabouts of the files, but, as he
reported, Snowden declined to answer that question. He would only
say that he was “confident he did not expose them to Chinese intelligence
in Hong Kong.” That answer did not nail down the issue,
so Wizner arranged for Vanity Fair, which was preparing an article
on Snowden, to submit questions. In his reply to them, Snowden
wrote that he destroyed all his files in Hong Kong because he didn’t
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 178
9/30/16 11:09 AM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 179
want to risk bringing them to Russia. He expanded on this claim in
three more interviews. These interviews were all with three journalists
who had opposed NSA surveillance: James Bamford, writing
for Wired magazine; Alan Rusbridger, the editor of The Guardian;
and Katrina vanden Heuvel, the editor of The Nation. He also gave
a televised interview to Brian Williams of NBC News in which he
explained that because he had no access to the NSA documents in
Russia, he could not provide access to the Russians even if they
“break my fingers.”
Snowden did not specify where, when, or how the putative
destruction of the files occurred and offered neither witnesses nor
evidence, other than the meaningless blank laptop screen, to corroborate
it. Still his new self- serving narrative was widely accepted
by the media. The fact remains, though, that Snowden went to considerable
risk to select, copy, and steal Level 3 documents before
leaving Hawaii for Hong Kong. These secrets were his last potential
bargaining chips. Why would he have destroyed them in June in
Hong Kong?
It is also difficult for me to accept that Snowden would destroy
these documents because he feared the Russians might get them.
If he was so concerned about the possibility, he could have stayed
in Hong Kong and fought extradition instead of flying to Russia.
Surely he must have realized that even without the files on his computer,
the Russian intelligence service could still obtain the NSA
secrets he held in his head. Indeed, as he told the Times, the secrets
he held in his head would have devastating consequences for NSA
operations.
In light of Kucherena’s statement that in Russia Snowden had
access to NSA documents, it would require a serious suspension of
disbelief to accept Snowden’s new narrative. Even if one were willing
to accept his new claim, it still would not mean that the NSA
documents had not fallen into the hands of adversaries. If he had
destroyed all of the electronic copies of the NSA’s data before boarding
his flight to Moscow, he still couldn’t be “100 percent” certain, as
he claimed, that the data had not been accessed by others prior to his
departure from Hong Kong. His files could have been copied with-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 179
9/29/16 5:51 PM
180 | how america lost its secrets
out his knowledge, just as he had copied them without the NSA’s
knowledge. As former U.S. intelligence officers pointed out to me,
adversary services could not be expected to shirk from employing
their full capabilities once they learned that an American “agent of
special services,” as Putin called him, had brought stolen NSA documents
to Hong Kong.
The Times reported from Hong Kong that two sources, both of
whom worked for major government intelligence agencies, “said
they believed that the Chinese government had managed to drain
the contents” of the laptop that Snowden brought to Hong Kong.
That China had the capability to obtain Snowden’s data was also
the view of the former CIA deputy director Morell. He said, “Both
the Chinese and the Russians would have used everything in their
tool kit— from human approaches to technical attacks— to get at
Snowden’s stolen data.”
Snowden would not have been a particularly difficult target for
them, especially after he started disclosing secrets to journalists at
the Mira hotel. Not only could the Chinese service approach the
security staff at the Mira, but they could track him after he left the
hotel and moved, along with his computers, in and out of several
residences arranged by his carer. Snowden, after all, had put himself
in the hands of people whom he had never met before, including
three Hong Kong lawyers, a carer, and three Guardian journalists.
It is likely that the efforts of these adversary intelligence services to
find him, and the NSA data, would further intensify after Snowden
revealed to the South China Morning Post on June 12 that he had
access to NSA lists of computers in China and elsewhere that the
NSA had penetrated.
It wouldn’t be only the Chinese service on his trail. The Russian
intelligence service would also likely be tasked to acquire these
NSA documents after Snowden’s meeting with Russian officials in
Hong Kong. And while he could get away with giving coy and elusive
answers to journalists who asked him about the whereabouts of
the NSA data, the Russian and Chinese officials in Hong Kong who
could offer him an escape route from prison would likely demand
more specific answers about the whereabouts of data they had not
already obtained by technical means.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 180
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 181
The Post– Hong Kong Documents
The NSA concern about who had access to its missing files deepened
further when NSA documents continued to surface in the press after
Snowden went to Moscow. If U.S. intelligence needed any further
evidence that someone had access to the documents, these additional
revelations provided it.
The most sensational of them was a purported document attributed
to Snowden concerning the NSA hacking of the cell phone of
the German chancellor, Angela Merkel. The story was published
on October 23 on the Der Spiegel website. Appelbaum was the coauthor
of the story. Even though Snowden had by now been in Russia
for four months, he was cited in the story, along with unnamed
“others,” as the source for the NSA document. Snowden did not
deny it. Indeed, he took a measure of credit for the revelation, saying
on German TV, “What I can say is we know Angela Merkel was
monitored by the National Security Agency.” If Snowden had been
involved in the release of this document, it would be consistent with
Kucherena’s assertion that he had access to the archive.
Adding to the intrigue, Poitras was apparently caught by surprise
when the Merkel story broke in Der Spiegel. She urgently texted
Snowden on what she called “background” (which ordinarily means
that a journalist will not attribute information to a source). She asked
him in the text to explain the NSA’s actions. Snowden explained to
her that Merkel was listed by her true name (and not by a code name)
in the NSA document because the German chancellor was an NSA
“target not an asset.” Presumably, Poitras would have already known
that distinction if she had the document referred to in Der Spiegel.
If the Merkel document was not among the data given to Poitras in
Hong Kong, how did it get to the authors of the Der Spiegel article?
Appelbaum, of course, had been in contact with Snowden before he
went public. He had served as Poitras’s co- interrogator of Snowden
while he was still working at the NSA in May 2013. Appelbaum
was also one of the leading supporters of WikiLeaks. Because he
was famously an advocate of revealing government secrets, it seems
unlikely that he would have delayed releasing such a bombshell
about Merkel’s phone if Snowden had given him this document
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 181
9/29/16 5:51 PM
182 | how america lost its secrets
before he left Hong Kong in June 2013. Why would Appelbaum keep
it secret for more than four months? The same pressure to publish
would also apply to the journalists Snowden had dealt with in Hong
Kong. If Snowden had given Poitras, Greenwald, Lam, or MacAskill
the Merkel document, or even told them about it in their interviews
with him in Hong Kong, The Guardian would have certainly rushed
out such a scoop.
According to a source with knowledge of the Snowden investigation,
there was no document referencing any spying on Merkel’s
phone among the fifty- eight thousand documents on the thumb
drive that Snowden had given to Poitras and Greenwald in Hong
Kong. That absence would explain why Poitras had to send a text to
Snowden in Moscow to ask for an explanation after the story broke.
Further confirmation of the absence of this document in the
material Snowden provided journalists in Hong Kong comes from
James Bamford, a well- respected expert on the NSA. In the course
of researching his 2014 article on Snowden for Wired, he was given
access to all the documents Snowden gave to Poitras, Greenwald, and
Gellman. Bamford used a sophisticated indexing program to search
through the database specifically for the Merkel material. He did not
find any. He reported that no document given to journalists in Hong
Kong even mentioned Merkel. It therefore appeared that the Merkel
document was provided to Der Spiegel after Snowden went to Moscow.
If so, some party had access to NSA documents after Snowden
arrived in Russia and provided the Der Spiegel authors with the
scoop. In that context, it might not have been a pure coincidence that
Kucherena disclosed that Snowden had access to documents that he
had not given to journalists in Hong Kong shortly before just such a
document was published in Germany.
Bamford explored the possibility that there might be another person
in the NSA who was stealing documents. He wrote to Poitras
and asked her whether the Merkel document could have come from
another person in the NSA. She declined, via a letter from her lawyer,
to answer that question. But because she had not been the author of
the Der Spiegel article, and had not been given the document, there
is no reason to believe that she would know its provenance.
Documents continued to emerge years after Snowden arrived in
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 182
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 183
Moscow that were more embarrassing to America. In June 2015, the
WikiLeaks website released another putative Snowden document,
two years after he had supposedly wiped his computer clean in Hong
Kong. It revealed that the NSA had targeted the telephones of three
consecutive presidents of France— Jacques Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy,
and François Hollande.
According to a former NSA official, this document, like the 2013
Merkel material, was not among the data on the thumb drive given
to journalists in Hong Kong, which Greenwald confirmed. Greenwald
suggested to The New York Times that it might have been stolen
by another penetration in the NSA, presumably one who had
access to the same secret compartments as Snowden in 2013. Since
Greenwald and Poitras had no way of knowing about the documents
that Snowden did not give them, it is equally possible that the Russian
intelligence services obtained this document from Snowden and
later gave it to WikiLeaks. The release on Assange’s WikiLeaks site
came in the midst of NATO war games held near the Russian border,
which Putin had vehemently denounced. The accompanying article
was co- authored by Assange, who now claimed to have access to
Snowden’s NSA material. Because Assange had been in telephonic
contact with Snowden in Hong Kong, and his deputy, Sarah Harrison,
had spent five months in Moscow with Snowden in 2013, it
is certainly possible Snowden was his source. But it seems difficult
to believe that Assange waited two years before publishing because
he has made it part of his modus operandi to publish documents
immediately. Because WikiLeaks receives documents anonymously
via its Tor software, any party with access to the Snowden files
could have sent it. Subsequently, in July 2016, Assange released via
WikiLeaks a cache of politically disruptive documents from the files
of the Democratic National Committee. U.S. intelligence strongly
suspected they been stolen by the Russian intelligence services and
sent to WikiLeaks. If so, Russia made use of Assange and WikiLeaks
to exploit selected fruits of its espionage activities
Greenwald and Poitras also released belated documents. On
July 15, 2015, their web publication, The Intercept, released a
Snowden document that cited an NSA intercept of an Israeli military
communication concerning an Israeli raid in Syria on August 1,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 183
9/29/16 5:51 PM
184 | how america lost its secrets
2008. It revealed that a group of Israeli commandos killed General
Muhammad Suleiman, a top aide to President Bashar al- Assad
who had been working with North Korea to build a nuclear facility
in Syria. Israel had destroyed that facility in Operation Orchard
nearly a year earlier. Whatever the purpose of this new release of an
NSA document (which had little if anything to do with any of the
NSA’s own operations), it was not among the data that Snowden had
given Poitras and Greenwald in Hong Kong in 2013, according to a
source with access to the investigation. Next, on January 28, 2016,
The Intercept published data taken from a GHCQ (the British cipher
service) file furnished by Snowden revealing military intelligence
activities abroad. Specifically, it disclosed that the United States and
Britain were intercepting data from Israel’s military drones in 2008.
British intelligence had determined in 2013 that the material sent
to Greenwald via a courier did not contain such GCHQ documents.
If that is the case, then Poitras and Greenwald, like Appelbaum and
Assange, were still receiving NSA documents that Snowden had
allegedly stolen a long time after he went to Russia and claimed he
had destroyed all his files.
The NSA reportedly determined that these belated documents,
most of which concerned American allies in Germany, France, and
Israel, had been among the material copied during the Snowden
breach. They provided further reason to believe that someone still
had access to the documents that were not distributed to journalists
in Hong Kong. Kucherena’s disclosure, just before the first post–
Hong Kong release, that Snowden still had access to the NSA files
made it appear plausible that Snowden sent these documents to Der
Spiegel, WikiLeaks, and The Intercept.
A former high- ranking KGB officer I interviewed had a very different
view. He told me that in his experience an intelligence defector
to Russia would not be allowed to distribute secret material to
journalists without explicit approval by the security service tending
him. He added that this injunction would be especially true in
the case of Snowden because Putin had publicly enjoined him from
releasing U.S. intelligence data. The more plausible alternative was
that this material was released at the behest of the Russian intelligence
service.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 184
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 185
The mystery of the post– Hong Kong documents also intrigued
members of the U.S. intelligence community with whom I discussed
it. When I asked a former intelligence executive about the ultimate
source for the Merkel story, he responded, “If Snowden didn’t give
journalists this document in Hong Kong, we can assume an intermediary
fed it to Appelbaum to publish in Der Spiegel.” According
to him, the NSA investigation had determined that Snowden indeed
had copied an NSA list of the cell phone numbers of foreign leaders,
including the number of Merkel. This list became the basis of the
Der Spiegel story.
It was also clear that Snowden gave credence to the release in Moscow.
He made a major point about the hacking of Merkel’s phone
in an interview with Wired in 2014. Just about two weeks before
the leak, Kucherena said Snowden still had access to the documents.
Clearly, someone had access. But whoever was behind it, the release
of information about the alleged bugging of Merkel’s phone resulted
in badly fraying U.S. relations with Germany in the midst of developing
troubles in Ukraine. As it later turned out, according to the
investigation of the German federal prosecutor, which concluded in
2015, there was no evidence found in this document, or elsewhere,
that Merkel’s calls were ever actually intercepted. Although they
revealed little if anything that the intelligence services of Germany,
France, and Israel were not already aware of, they raised a public
outcry in allies against NSA surveillance, and the outcry became the
event itself.
While these post– Hong Kong documents had little if any intelligence
value, they provided further evidence that at least part of
the stolen NSA documents was in the hands of a party hostile to the
United States. If so, it wasn’t much of a leap to assume that this party
also had access to the far more valuable Level 3 documents revealing
the NSA’s sources and methods, such as the one that Ledgett had
described as a “roadmap” to U.S. electronic espionage against Russia
and China.
Within the intelligence community, this concern was heightened
by new countermeasures to this espionage employed by Russia and
China after Snowden reached Moscow. For example, there were
indications that the NSA had lost part of its capabilities to follow
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 185
9/29/16 5:51 PM
186 | how america lost its secrets
Russian troop movements in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine. U.S.
intelligence officials even went so far as to suggest, according to a
report in The Wall Street Journal, that “Russian planners might
have gotten a jump on the West by evading U.S. eavesdropping.”
Britain also discovered that some of its secret operations had been
compromised after Snowden went to Moscow. According to a 2015
story in the Sunday Times of London, British intelligence had determined
that Britain’s intelligence- gathering sources had been exposed
to adversary services by documents that Snowden had stolen from
the NSA in 2013. These documents had been provided to the NSA
by the GCHQ. Unless such intelligence disasters were freak aberrations,
it appeared to confirm General Alexander’s warning in 2014
that the NSA was “losing some of its capabilities, because they’re
being disclosed to our adversaries.”
Snowden’s supporters disputed this view. If only as an act of faith
in Snowden’s personal integrity, they continued to believe his avowal
to Senator Humphrey that he had acted to protect U.S. secrets by
shielding them from adversary intelligence services after he took
them abroad. They also continued to take him at his word when he
said he had destroyed all the NSA documents before going to Russia.
Despite such protestations of patriotic loyalty, U.S. intelligence
officials could not so easily dismiss the possibility that the missing
documents still existed. After all, a U.S. intelligence worker who is
dedicated to protecting America’s secrets from its adversaries does
not ordinarily steal them.
The NSA, the CIA, and the Department of Defense therefore
had little choice but to assume the worst had happened: Russia and
China had obtained access to the “keys to the kingdom.” Whatever
the extent of the actual damage, it was up to Alexander’s replacement,
Admiral Michael Rogers, both to restore morale and to rebuild
the capabilities of America’s electronic intelligence in the wake of
the massive breach. According to a national security staff member
in the Obama White House, that job would take more than a decade.
The NSA had failed to protect vital assets. This intelligence failure
did not happen out of the blue.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 186
9/29/16 5:51 PM
c h a p t e r 18
The Unheeded Warning
The NSA— the world’s most capable signals intelligence organization,
an agency immensely skilled in stealing digital data— had
had its pockets thoroughly picked.
— cia deputy director michael morell, 2015
In april 2010, the CIA received a stark reminder of the ongoing
nature of Russian espionage. It came in the form of a message
from one of its best- placed moles in the Russian intelligence service.
This surreptitious source was Alexander Poteyev, a fifty- four- yearold
colonel in the SVR, which was the successor agency to the first
chief directorate of the KGB. While the FSB took over the KGB’s
domestic role in 1991, the SVR became Russia’s foreign intelligence
service. Its operation center was in the Yasenevo district of Moscow.
The CIA had recruited Poteyev as a mole in the 1990s when he had
been stationed at the Russian embassy in Washington, D.C. That it
could sustain a mole in Moscow for over a decade attested to its capabilities
in the espionage business. After he returned to Moscow, still
secretly on the CIA’s payroll, he became the deputy chief of the SVR’s
“American” section. This unit of Russian intelligence had the primary
responsibility for establishing spies in the CIA, the FBI, the
NSA, and other American intelligence agencies.
The SVR’s last known (or caught) mole in U.S. intelligence was
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 187
9/29/16 5:51 PM
188 | how america lost its secrets
the CIA officer Harold Nicholson, in 1996. Before it could expand its
espionage capabilities, it needed to build a network of Russian agents
in the United States. For this network, it needed to groom so- called
illegals, or agents who were not connected to the Russian embassy.
This so- called illegals network was necessary because presumably
all Russian diplomats, including the so- called legal members of Russian
intelligence, were under constant surveillance by the FBI.
Advances in surveillance technology in the twenty- first century
made it increasingly difficult to communicate with recruits through
its diplomatic missions. To evade it, the “American” division of the
SVR was given the task of placing individuals in the United States
disguised as ordinary Americans. Their “legend,” or operational
cover, could be thin because they would not be applying for jobs in
the government. Their job was simply to blend in with their community
until they were called upon by the “American” department
in Moscow to service a mole who had been planted in U.S. intelligence
or other parts of the U.S. government. Until they were activated
by such a call, they were classified as sleeper agents. Unlike the
SVR’s “legal” officers, who were attached to Russian embassies as
diplomats and were protected from arrest by the Treaty of Vienna,
the SVR’s illegal agents lack diplomatic immunity. According to
Pavel Sudoplatov, who defected from the KGB in the Cold War, the
sole job of such sleeper agents was to “live under cover in the West
awaiting assignments for the Center.” One assignment that justifies
the expense of maintaining such agents is to service a penetration,
after one is made, in the U.S. intelligence establishment. While waiting
to be activated for such a job, sleeper agents were instructed to
build every detail of their cover identity so as to perfectly blend in
with Americans.
To build this American network of sleeper agents took the better
part of a decade. In 2005, the SVR’s “American” section in Moscow
had begun methodically installing them in the United States.
Almost all were Russian citizens who had assumed new identities to
better blend into their communities.
The CIA learned of this sleeper program through Poteyev soon
after it began. The issue was how to exploit this knowledge. When I
was writing my book on international deception, James Jesus Angle-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 188
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Unheeded Warning | 189
ton had pointed out to me that “the business of intelligence services
requires understanding precisely the relationship of their opposition
to them.” His view, though his opponents inside the CIA would
call it with some justification an obsession, was that an intelligence
service had to focus on the moves of its rivals. To accomplish this
“business” in the first decade of the twenty- first century, the CIA
had to establish why its new opposition, the SVR, was laying the
foundation for an espionage operation. What were its priorities in
the resumption of the intelligence war? Its inside man in the SVR,
Poteyev, provided it with a tremendous advantage in this relationship.
He knew the links in a sleeper network that the SVR believed
was safely hidden from surveillance. If they were followed, when
they were activated, they could expose whatever recruits the SVR
had in the American government. The CIA duly shared this information
about the sleeper ring with the FBI, which had the responsibility
for the surveillance of foreign agents in the United States.
The FBI, for its part, kept the Russian sleeper agents under tight
surveillance— an operation that grew in complexity and expense as
more SVR agents arrived in the United States.
Meanwhile, in Moscow, Poteyev was following the unfolding
operation. Part of his SVR job was to continue preparing these
“Americans,” as they were called by the SVR, for their assignments.
Some had been sent as couples, others as singles. One of the singles
that Poteyev personally handled was Anna Kushchyenko. She
was a strikingly beautiful Russian student who changed her name
to Anna Chapman by briefly marrying a British citizen she met at
a rave party. After taking his name, she left him. After completing
her training in Russia, she was sent by the SVR to New York City
to establish herself as an international real estate specialist. Other
“Americans” under Poteyev’s watch became travel agents, students,
and financial advisers. In all, Poteyev identified to the CIA twelve
such sleeper agents. The cost of FBI surveillance of them over the
years became sizable. According to a former FBI agent, around- theclock
surveillance on the movements and communications of a single
individual can cost over $10,000 a day.
When the CIA received Poteyev’s message in 2010 warning that
Russian military intelligence had asked the SVR to activate some of
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 189
9/29/16 5:51 PM
190 | how america lost its secrets
its sleeper agents for a highly sensitive assignment, that suggested
Russian intelligence had found a possible source who could supply
it with valuable information. According to a former CIA intelligence
official who later became involved in the case, the assignment
involved preparing these agents to service a potential source in the
NSA at Fort Meade, Maryland. If true, it suggested that Russian
intelligence either had found or was working on a means of penetrating
the NSA.
In 2010, the NSA division that handled such security and espionage
threats reportedly initiated a counterespionage probe at the
NSA’s Fort Meade headquarters. According to a former NSA official,
“They [were] looking for one or more Russian spies that NSA [was]
convinced resided at Fort Meade and possibly other DoD Intel offices,
like DIA.” Because the NSA’s cryptological service had in 2010
thirty- five thousand military and civilian contractor employees, the
search for a possible leak was no easy matter. According to a subsequent
note in the NSA’s secret budget report to Congress, it would
require “a minimum of 4,000 periodic investigations of employees
in position to compromise sensitive information” to safely guard
against “insider threats by trusted insiders who seek to exploit their
authorized access to sensitive information to harm U.S. interests.”
According to a former executive in the intelligence community,
that amount of investigation far exceeded the budgetary capabilities
of the NSA. So while the investigation found no evidence of
SVR recruitment, it remained possible that Russian intelligence had
found a candidate in the NSA.
Meanwhile, in June 2010, to preempt such a leak in U.S. intelligence
and avoid any potential embarrassment that could result, the
FBI decided it could no longer engage in this sort of an intelligence
game with the sleeper network. It arrested all twelve sleeper agents
identified by Poteyev. After receiving a great deal of public attention
(which led to their inspiring the FX series The Americans), the
sleeper agents were deported to Russia. This move had both advantages
and disadvantages. The main advantage was that it severed any
communication link between the putative person of interest in the
NSA and Russian intelligence via the sleeper agents. The main disadvantage
was that it eliminated the possibility that FBI surveillance
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 190
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Unheeded Warning | 191
of the illegals might lead the FBI to a possible recruit in the NSA or
elsewhere.
The preemptive arrests also had an unforeseen consequence.
They resulted in accidently compromising Poteyev. When Chapman
returned to Moscow after a spy exchange, she was taken to
a well- publicized dinner with Putin. Afterward, she informed her
debriefer at the SVR that only Poteyev had been in a position to
know the password that an FBI agent had used to try to deceive
her into believing she was speaking to an SVR officer. This brought
Poteyev under immediate suspicion. Tipped off by the CIA to the
FBI’s error, Poteyev managed to escape by taking a train from Moscow
to Belarus, where the CIA exfiltrated him to the United States.
Poteyev had been saved from prison— or worse— but he was no longer
useful to the CIA as a mole. Without the services of Poteyev in
the SVR in Moscow, U.S. intelligence was unable to find out further
details about the mission to which Poteyev’s sleeper agents were to
be assigned. All it had discovered was the history of the preparations
for a major espionage revival. It now knew that the SVR had
installed plumbing in America and that one or more agents in this
network had been activated to handle a possible recruit in the NSA.
But without anyone left in the sleeper network to follow and without
an inside source in the SVR, it had no further avenues to fruitfully
pursue. The revelation of the sleeper agents had little if any
other intelligence value.
The NSA’s own security investigation turned up no evidence of a
leak at Fort Meade in 2010. That of course doesn’t mean there hadn’t
been one. The Russian intelligence service had demonstrated in the
past that it was well schooled in covering its tracks in operations
against U.S. communications intelligence. For example, CIA counterintelligence
had learned from a KGB defector in the early 1960s
that Russian intelligence had penetrated the cipher room at the U.S.
embassy in Moscow and, because of this operation, the KGB was able
to decipher crucial communications. Even so, it failed to find either
the perpetrator or any evidence of his existence for more than half
a century. The operation was only definitively revealed by the Russian
spymaster Sergey Kondrashev in 2007. Tennent Bagley, who
headed the CIA’s Soviet bloc counterintelligence at the time, lately
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 191
9/29/16 5:51 PM
192 | how america lost its secrets
wrote in his book that the ability of Russian intelligence to conceal
this penetration for more than half a century “broke the record for
secret keeping.”
This Russian ability to penetrate U.S. intelligence was not entirely
defeated by America’s implementation of more sophisticated security
procedures, such as the polygraph examination and extensive
background checks. In 1995, eleven years before Snowden joined it,
the CIA’s inspector general completed a study of the KGB’s use of
false defectors to mislead the U.S. government from the end of the
Cold War in the late 1980s through the mid- 1990s. It found Russia
had dispatched at least half a dozen double agents who provided
misleading information to their CIA case officers.
Because the KGB operation went undetected for nearly a decade,
the disinformation prepared in Moscow had been incorporated into
reports (which had a distinctive blue stripe to signify their importance)
that had been provided to Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush,
and Bill Clinton. Even more shocking, in tracing the path of this
disinformation, the inspector general found that the “senior CIA
officers responsible for these reports had known that some of their
sources for this information were controlled by Russian intelligence,”
yet they did not inform the president and officials receiving
the blue- striped reports that they included Russian misinformation.
What the CIA director John Deutch called “an inexcusable lapse”
also reflected a form of institutional willful blindness in U.S. intelligence,
borne out of a bureaucratic fear of career embarrassment so
well described in Le Carré’s spy novels. Detecting intelligence failures
has, if anything, become even more difficult in the age of the
anonymous Internet.
The Snowden breach demonstrated the NSA had few if any failsafe
defenses against would- be leakers of communications intelligence.
In the new domain of cyber warfare, conventional defensive
rules do not apply. “There are no rivers or hills up here. It’s all flat.
All advantage goes to the attacker,” General Hayden said in an interview
in 2015 with the publisher of The Wall Street Journal. His point
was that because there are no defensive positions, the United States
in cyber warfare must rely on an aggressive offensive. If fully successful,
such an offensive would so deeply penetrate the defenses of
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 192
9/29/16 5:51 PM
The Unheeded Warning | 193
an adversary’s intelligence organization that it could not mount any
of its own surprise cyber attacks. It would also make it difficult if not
impossible for adversary services to recruit a spy in the NSA. For
example, the CIA penetration of the SVR in 2010 prevented it from
using its sleeper network against U.S. targets. “The best defense
in this game may be an overwhelming offensive,” a former intelligence
official said to me. “But that strategy only works if we can
keep secret sensitive sources.”
Central to this offensive strategy was the NSA’s National Threat
Operations Center in Oahu. It employed threat analysts to surreptitiously
monitor the secret activities of potential enemies, mainly
China, Russia, and North Korea. A large part of their job was to
make transparent to the United States the hostile activities of the
Russian and Chinese services so that they posed little if any intelligence
threat to America. This strategy worked so long as the NSA
guarded itself, but it also raised the issue, as the Roman Juvenal
famously warned, “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (Who will guard
the guards themselves?)
Less than three years after the NSA had received the Poteyev
warning, instead of guarding secrets, Snowden stole them. Despite
all the measures the NSA had taken to protect its vital secrets, a
lowly civilian employee had walked away with the lists of secret
NSA sources in China and Russia and then gone first to China and
then to Russia. In the hands of their intelligence services, these stolen
lists had the potential to totally upend the NSA’s offensive strategy.
Because Russia and China have an intelligence treaty for sharing
such spoils between them when it is to their mutual advantage, it
had to be assumed that if either country had acquired the secrets
from Snowden, they would be shared between them, altering the
balance of power between the communications intelligence services
of the United States and its adversaries.
Following the Snowden breach, both China and Russia had
immense successes in breaking through the defenses of U.S. government
networks, including the reported breaches in 2014 and 2015 of
U.S. personnel files and background checks. When I asked General
Hayden in June 2015 if these successes were made easier by those
documents compromised by Snowden, he replied, “Even though I
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 193
9/29/16 5:51 PM
194 | how america lost its secrets
cannot make a direct correlation here, unarguably our adversaries
know far more about how we collect signals intelligence than they
ever did before [Snowden].”
If Snowden could cause such massive damage, so could other civilian
trainees at the NSA. Someone in the chain of command had to
take responsibility. General Alexander tendered his resignation on
June 30, 2013. “I’m the director,” he said, falling on his sword. “Ultimately,
I’m accountable.” Because President Obama did not want
the head of the NSA resigning in the midst of the Snowden crisis,
he asked him to stay on for another six months. He then appointed
Rogers to be his replacement. Meanwhile, it had become undeniably
clear to the review committee appointed by President Obama in
2013 that the NSA’s own defenses had catastrophically failed. If so,
this change was the equivalent of rearranging the deck chairs on the
Titanic after it hit the iceberg.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 194
9/29/16 5:51 PM
part three
THE GAME OF NATIONS
I learned that just beneath the surface there’s another world,
and still different worlds as you dig deeper.
—david lynch, on his 1986 film, Blue Velvet
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 195
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 196
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 19
The Rise of the NSA
There are many things we do in intelligence that, if revealed,
would have the potential for all kinds of blowback.
— james clapper, director of national intelligence, 2013
In the game of nations, which often is not visible to public
scrutiny, the great prize is state secrets that reveal the hidden
weaknesses of a nation’s potential adversaries. The most important
of these in peacetime is communication intercepts. It was just
such state secrets that Edward Snowden took from the NSA in the
spring of 2013. Before that breach, America’s paramount advantage
in this subterranean competition was its undisputed dominance in
the business of obtaining and deciphering the communications of
other nations. The NSA was the instrument by which the United
States both protected its own secret communications and stole the
secrets of foreign nations. The NSA, however, has an Achilles’s heel:
It is dependent on civilian computer technicians who do not necessarily
share its values to operate its complex system. Because of this
dependence, it was not able in 2013, as it turned out, to protect its
crucial sources and methods.
Snowden exposed this vulnerability when he walked away with
the aforementioned descriptions of the gaps in America’s coverage
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 197
9/30/16 8:13 AM
198 | how america lost its secrets
of the communications of its adversaries. Even though the Cold War
had been declared over after the collapse of the Soviet Union a quarter
of a century earlier, the age- old enterprise of espionage did not
end with it. Russia and China still sought to blunt the edge that the
NSA gave the United States. The Snowden breach therefore needs to
be considered in the context of the once and future intelligence war.
The modern enterprise of reading the communications of other
nations traces back in the United States to military code- breaking
efforts preceding America’s entry into World War I. The invention
of the radio at the end of the nineteenth century soon provided the
means of rapidly sending and getting messages from ships, submarines,
ground forces, spies, and embassies. These over- the- air messages
could also be intercepted from the ether by adversaries. If they
were to remain secret, they could not be sent in plain text. They
had to be sent in either code, in which letters are substituted for one
another, or, more effectively, a cipher, in which numbers are substituted
for letters. Making and breaking codes and ciphers became
a crucial enterprise for nations. By 1914, the U.S. Army and Navy
had set up units, staffed by mathematicians, linguists, and crossword
puzzle solvers, to intercept and decode enemy messages. After the
war had ended in 1918, these units were fused into a cover corporation
called the Code Compilation Company, which moved to new
offices on Thirty- Seventh Street and Madison Avenue in New York
City.
Under the supervision of the famous cryptographer Herbert O.
Yardley, a team of twenty code breakers was employed in what was
called the Black Chamber. Yardley arranged for Western Union,
which had the telegraph monopoly in America, to provide the Black
Chamber with all the telegrams coming into the United States. “Its
far- seeking eyes penetrate the secret conference chambers at Washington,
Tokyo, London, Paris, Geneva, Rome,” Yardley wrote about
the Black Chamber. “Its sensitive ears catch the faintest whispering
in the foreign capitals of the world.” But in 1929, at the instructions
of President Herbert Hoover, Secretary of State Henry Stimson
closed the Black Chamber, saying famously, “Gentlemen should not
read each other’s mail.”
The moratorium did not last long. With war looming in Asia and
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 198
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Rise of the NSA | 199
Europe, President Franklin D. Roosevelt reactivated the operation
as the Signal Security Agency. It proved its value in breaking the
Japanese machine- generated cipher “Purple.” In June 1942, using
deciphered Japanese messages to pinpoint the location of the Japanese
fleet at Midway, America won a decisive naval victory in the
Pacific. Germany’s Enigma encoding machines, with three encoding
wheels, proved more of a challenge. Initially, British cryptanalysts
led by the brilliant mathematician Alan Turing succeeded in building
a rudimentary computer to decipher Germany’s messages to its
submarines and bombers, but in 1942 Germany added a fourth set of
encoding wheels, escalating what was essentially a battle of machine
intelligence. The U.S. Navy then contracted with the National Cash
Register Company to build a computing machine capable of breaking
the improved Enigma, and in May 1943 it succeeded.
By the time the war ended in 1945, the United States had over
one hundred giant decryption machines in operation. This unrivaled
capability to read the communications of foreign nations, which
remained one of America’s most closely guarded secrets, was transferred
to the Army Security Agency based at Fort Meade, Maryland.
Then, on October 24, 1952, President Harry S. Truman greatly
expanded its purview and changed its name to the National Security
Agency.
The NSA was given two missions. The first one was protecting
the communications of the U.S. government. The main risk was that
the Soviets would find a way of breaching U.S. government channels
of communications. The second mission was intercepting all the
relevant communications and signals of foreign governments. This
latter mandate included the governments of allies as well as enemies.
The president, the other intelligence services, and the Department
of Defense deemed what was relevant for national security. Even
though the NSA remained part of the Department of Defense, its
job went far beyond providing military intelligence. It also acted as
a service agency to other American intelligence services. They prepared
shopping lists of foreign communications intelligence targets
for the NSA to pursue.
As the Cold War heated up in the 1960s, the NSA provided intelligence
not only to the Pentagon but to the Department of State, the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 199
9/30/16 8:13 AM
200 | how america lost its secrets
Central Intelligence Agency, the Treasury Department, the Atomic
Energy Commission, and the FBI. With a multibillion- dollar “black
budget” hidden from public scrutiny, the NSA’s technology directorate
invested in state- of- the- art equipment, including supercomputers
that could break almost any cipher, antennas mounted on geosynchronous
satellites that vacuumed in billions of foreign telephone
calls, and other exotic capabilities. It also devised stealthy means of
breaking into channels that its adversaries believed were secure. This
enterprise required not only an army of technical specialists capable
of remotely intercepting even the faintest traces of electromagnetic
signals, hacking into computers, and eavesdropping on distant conversations
but also special units called “tailored access operations,”
to plant listening devices in embassies and diplomatic pouches. The
NSA also organized elaborate expeditions to give access to or even
penetrate physical cables in enemy territory. In 1971, for example,
the NSA sent a specially equipped submarine into Russia’s Sea of
Okhotsk in Asia to tap through Arctic ice. The target was a Russian
cable four hundred feet below the surface that connected the Russian
naval headquarters in Vladivostok with a missile testing range.
In 1980, President Ronald Reagan gave the NSA a clear mandate
to expand its interception of foreign communications. In Executive
Order 12333, he told the NSA that “all means, consistent with applicable
Federal law and this [Executive] order, and with full consideration
of the rights of United States persons, shall be used to obtain
reliable intelligence information to protect the United States and its
interests.” It did not restrict any foreign country, either an adversary
or an ally, from its surveillance.
The NSA’s target soon became nothing short of the entire electromagnetic
spectrum. “We are approaching a time when we will
be able to survey almost any point on the earth’s surface with some
sensor,” Admiral Stansfield Turner, the former director of central
intelligence, wrote in 1985. “We should soon be able to keep track
of most of the activities on the surface of the earth.” Bobby Ray
Inman, a former director of the NSA and deputy director of the CIA,
argued that the “vastness of the [American] intelligence ‘take’ from
the Soviet Union, and the pattern of continuity going back years,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 200
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Rise of the NSA | 201
even decades,” greatly diminished the possibility of Soviet deception
so long as the NSA kept secret its sources.
The NSA did not rely entirely on its own sensors for this global
surveillance. It also formed intelligence- sharing alliances with key
allies. The most important was with the British code- breaking service,
GCHQ, which had achieved enormous success in World War II
in using computers to crack the German Enigma cipher. This alliance
expanded to include Canada, Australia, and New Zealand in the socalled
Five Eyes Alliance. Because over 80 percent of international
phone calls and Internet traffic passed through fiber- optic cables in
these five countries, the alliance had the capability of monitoring
almost all phone and Internet communications.
The NSA also established fruitful liaisons with the cyber services
of Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Israel,
Japan, and South Korea, which were often willing to provide the
NSA with access to telecommunications links in their countries.
These long- term allies greatly strengthened the NSA’s hand in other
ways in the intelligence war. For example, the so- called James Bond
provision of the British Intelligence Services Act of 1994 allowed
officers of the GCHQ to commit illegal acts outside Britain, including
planting devices to intercept data from computer servers, cell
phones, and other electronic targets. And, as Snowden’s release of
documents revealed in 2013 and 2014, these foreign allies fully
shared their information with the NSA.
Of course, the liaison between the NSA and its allies was a twoway
street. In 2013, none of these other countries had a global network
of geosynchronous sensors in outer space and under the ocean
that could monitor signals from missile launching, submarines,
military deployments, nuclear tests, and other matters of strategic
importance to them. Nor did these allies have the cipher- breaking
capabilities of the array of NSA supercomputers. The NSA had
assiduously built these means at a cost of over half a trillion dollars
and employed tens of thousands of linguists who could translate
almost any dialect or language of interest.
Even though these allies had their own cipher services and local
capabilities, they depended on the NSA to provide them with a large
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 201
9/30/16 8:13 AM
202 | how america lost its secrets
share of their signals intelligence. From the perspective of defending
themselves from potential threats, the deal that these allies had with
the NSA was mutually advantageous.
The NSA’s overseas intelligence gathering was not limited to
adversary nations. With the exception of the Five Eyes allies, it
gathered data that was deemed important by the president and the
Defense Department in friendly countries. These operations had
been approved by every American president and funded by every
American Congress since 1941. After all, even in the realm of allies,
activities take place that run counter to American interests. The 9/11
conspiracy, for example, was hatched in Hamburg, Germany, and
financed in Dubai and Saudi Arabia.
Nor were American allies unaware of the reach of the NSA. “Yes,
my continental European friends, we have spied on you. And it is
true we use computers to sort through data by using keywords,”
the former CIA director James Woolsey wrote in The Wall Street
Journal in 2000. “Have you stopped to ask yourselves what we are
looking for?” Whether or not it was appreciated by other countries,
the global harvesting of communications intelligence by the NSA
was hardly a secret.
As the NSA expanded further, it delegated part of its work to
regional bases, including ones in Utah, Texas, Hawaii, and Japan. The
paramount task of the NSA remained monitoring the channels of
communications that an adversary might use. The vast proliferation
of these channels in cyberspace, which included e- mail, social
media, document sharing, and other innovations of the Internet age,
greatly complicated this task. Even so, this challenge was not insurmountable,
because most of the Internet actually traveled through
fiberglass landline cables that crossed the territories of the United
States, Britain, and Australia. So the NSA found the technical means,
including voluntarily gaining access to major Internet companies, to
“harvest” vast amounts of this Internet data. America’s other intelligence
agencies quickly recognized the value of the communications
intelligence gleaned from foreign telecommunications. John E.
McLaughlin, who was the CIA’s acting director in 2004, described
the NSA as nothing less than the “very foundation of U.S. intelligence.”
It served as a “foundation” for the CIA because intercepted
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 202
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Rise of the NSA | 203
communications intelligence allowed the CIA (and other U.S. intelligence
services) to test and verify the reports of their human sources
in foreign countries. Moreover, because of the immense amount of
foreign data that the NSA vacuumed in through its global sensors,
it provided the CIA with an effective means for discovering new
targets in adversary nations.
By the first decade of this century, the NSA’s surreptitious efforts
to render the Internet transparent to U.S. intelligence had earned it
a new set of enemies. They were the previously mentioned hacktivists
who were attempting to shield the activities of Internet users
from the intrusions of government surveillance. They employed
both encryption and Tor software to defeat that surveillance. But the
NSA did not conceal that it was intent on countering any attempt to
interfere with its surveillance of the Internet. It built back doors into
encryption and worked to unravel the Tor scrambling of IP addresses.
It made leading hacktivists targets. Brian Hale, the spokesman for
the director of national intelligence, disclosed that the United States
routinely intercepted the cyber signatures of parties suspected of
hacking into U.S. government networks.
Following the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade
Center, the surveillance of the Internet became an integral part of
the Bush administration’s war on terrorism. In October 2001, Congress
expanded the NSA’s mandate by passing the USA Patriot Act.
As I described earlier, Section 215 of the act directly authorized
the NSA, with the approval of the FISA court, to collect and store
domestic telephone billing records. The idea was to better coordinate
domestic and foreign intelligence about al- Qaeda and other jihadist
groups. This put the NSA directly in the anti- terrorist business.
It also necessitated the NSA vastly increasing its coverage of the
Internet.
The mantra in government in this post- 9/11 intelligence world
became “connect the dots.” Congress through this act essentially
demolished the wall between domestic and foreign intelligence
when any NSA activity related to foreign- directed terrorism. It further
made the NSA a partner with the FBI in tracking phone calls
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 203
9/30/16 8:13 AM
204 | how america lost its secrets
made from phones originating outside the United States by known
foreign jihadists. If these calls were made to individuals inside, the
NSA was now authorized to retrieve the billing records of the person
called and those people whom he or she called. These traces were
then supplied to the FBI. The new duties also increased the NSA’s
need to create new bureaucratic mechanisms to monitor its compliance
with FISA court orders. Rajesh De, the NSA’s general counsel at
the time of the Snowden breach, described the NSA as becoming by
2013 “one of the most regulated enterprises in the world.” Grafted
onto its intelligence activities were layers of mandated reporting to
oversight officials. Not only did the NSA have its own chief compliance
officer, chief privacy and civil liberties officer, and independent
inspector general, but the NSA also had to report to a different set
of compliance officers at the Department of Defense, the Office of
the Director of National Intelligence, and the Department of Justice.
Additionally, the Department of Justice dispatched a team of lawyers
every sixty days to review the results of “every single tasking decision”
approved by the FISA court.
According to De, just assembling these reports involved thousands
of hours of manpower. In addition, the president’s Oversight Board
required that the NSA’s Office of the General Counsel and inspector
general supply it every ninety days with a list of every single
error and deviation from procedure made by every NSA employee
anywhere in the world, including even minor typing errors. These
requirements, according to De, inundated a large part of the NSA
legal and executive staff in a sea of red tape. Yet this regulation could
not undo surveillance programs such as the one Snowden revealed
of Verizon’s turning over the billing records of its customers to the
NSA, because the NSA was in compliance with the FISA court order
(even though, as it turned out in 2015, the FISA court might have
erred in interpreting the law).
The NSA’s focus on surveillance might have led to the neglect of
its other mission: protecting the integrity of the channels through
which the White House, government agencies, and military units
send information. This task had been made vastly more difficult
by the proliferation of computer networks, texting, and e- mails.
To protect government networks from cyber attacks, the Penta-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 204
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Rise of the NSA | 205
gon belatedly created the U.S. Cyber Command in 2009. In it, the
cyber- defense units of the army, navy, marines, and air force cyber
forces were merged together and put under the command of the
NSA director. General Keith Alexander became the first director
of this new command. One problem for the Cyber Command was
separating attacks by civilians, including criminals, hacktivists, and
anarchists, from cyber warfare sponsored and supported by adversary
states. Because foreign intelligence services often closely imitated
the tools of civilian hackers, and were even known to provide
them with hacking tools, it was not easy for the Cyber Command
to unambiguously determine if the ultimate perpetrator of a cyber
attack was state sponsored. For example, the identification of North
Korea as the principal actor behind the attack on Sony in December
2014 appeared to be a rare success, but many cyber- security experts
believed that it might be a false trail used to hide the real attacker.
Clues could be fabricated in cyberspace to point to the wrong party.
The job of the Cyber Command was to prevent such an attack. To
this end, it planted viruses on hundreds of thousands of computers
in private hands to act as sentinels to spot other suspicious viruses
that could mount such an attack. Private computers had become
a new battleground in the cyber wars. It also built a capability to
retaliate. Still, cyber attacks, which were launched through layers of
other countries’ computers, could not be unambiguously traced back
to the true perpetrator.
This escalation by the Cyber Command set the stage for expanded
forms of warfare in cyberspace. “The Chinese are viewed as the
source of a great many attacks on western infrastructure and just
recently, the U.S. electrical grid,” General Alexander said in explaining
the need for this consolidation. “If that is determined to be an
organized attack, I would want to go and take down the source of
those attacks.” The same retaliation would presumably be used
against Russia, Iran, or any other adversary. Dominance of cyberspace
itself now became part of the NSA’s mandate.
Even so, the most important job of the NSA remained intercepting
secret information from Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.
To this end, it had an annual budget of $12.3 billion and some thirtyfive
thousand military and civilian employees. In 2013, James Clap-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 205
9/30/16 8:13 AM
206 | how america lost its secrets
per, director of national intelligence, justified the secret intelligence
budget by saying in an open session of Congress, “We are bolstering
our support for clandestine SIGINT [signals intelligence] capabilities
to collect against high priority targets, including foreign leadership
targets,” and to develop “groundbreaking cryptanalytic capabilities
to defeat adversarial cryptography and exploit Internet traffic.” It
was no secret to Congress, even before Snowden, that the NSA was
attempting to monitor the Internet. What was a closely held secret
before Snowden revealed it was that the NSA had found a way in
2007 to intercept Internet traffic before it was encrypted.
Through all this tumult, the heart of the NSA’s activity remained
its five- thousand- acre base at Fort Meade, Maryland. It commanded
the most powerful mechanism for intercepting communications that
the world had ever seen. No other country came close to its technology
for intercepting information. The NSA not only was able to
intercept secret information from potential adversaries but also— at
least until the Snowden breach— managed to conceal these means
from them. As long as these adversaries remained blind to the ways
in which their communications were being intercepted, deciphered,
and read by the NSA, they could not take effective countermeasures.
Consequently, the NSA had the capability to provide the president
and his advisers with continuous insights into the thinking and
planning of potential enemies.
Keeping its sources and methods secret was no easy task. The
NSA’s technicians had to deal with continuous technical challenges
to provide a seamless harvesting of data from a wide range of communication
devices, including telephones, computers, and the Internet.
It required continuous intra- agency communications between
the NSA’s own intelligence officers and a growing number of civilian
technicians. It even had its own “Wiki- style” network through which
they could discuss problems, called the NSANet. Because it could
not tightly control access to this technical network, it expunged any
mention of the sources and methods from the material circulated on
the classified NSA network. Instead, it stored them in discrete computers,
called compartments, which were disconnected from other
computers at the NSA. These compartments could only be accessed
by a limited number of analysts and NSA executives who had a need
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 206
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Rise of the NSA | 207
to know about the data they contained. These compartments were
the final line of defense against an inside intruder.
In 2009, Snowden, as we know, found his way into the NSA
through a temporary job with an outside contractor that was working
for the NSA’s Technology Directorate to repair and update its
backup system. Four years later, by maneuvering to get hired by
another outside contractor with access to the NSA’s sources and
methods, he was able to steal secrets stored in isolated computers
bearing directly on the ongoing intelligence war. Snowden also
copied from these compartments in a matter of weeks, as has been
previously mentioned, the NSA’s Level 3 sources and methods used
against Russia, Iran, and China. The Snowden breach demonstrated
that the NSA’s envelope of secrecy was at best illusory.
After this immense loss, the NSA’s sources inside these adversary
countries were largely compromised, even if they were not closed
down. Once these adversaries were in a position to know what channels
the NSA was intercepting, they could use these same channels
to mislead U.S. intelligence. A former top intelligence official told
me, “The queen on our chessboard had been taken.”
The NSA moved to mitigate the damage and find new ways of
obtaining unexpected intelligence. In June 2014, the new NSA director,
Rogers, had to confront flagging morale that, according to General
Hayden, was near paralyzing the intelligence service. Rogers
recognized that as a direct result of the Snowden breach, “the nation
has lost capabilities against adversaries right now who are attempting
to actively undermine us.” But even with that loss, he observed,
“the sky has not fallen.”
As in the Chicken Little fable he cited, the world had not ended
for the NSA. Nor had it ended for the multibillion- dollar outsourcing
enterprise it superintended. The NSA might have lost many
of its sources, or “capabilities,” but Rogers held out hope that new
sources could eventually be found to replace them. Compromised
codes, after all, could be changed. New technological methods could
be devised. New vulnerabilities could also be targeted in enemy territories.
Although repairing the damage might take many “decades,”
according to Michael McConnell, the vice- chairman of Booz Allen,
the new director had to get on with that task. McConnell, a for-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 207
9/30/16 8:13 AM
208 | how america lost its secrets
mer NSA director himself, pointed out that the NSA director’s “first
responsibility is to be the chief cheerleader.” Rebuilding the NSA
capabilities assumed, however, that there would not be another
Snowden- sized breach.
The question remained: How could the NSA’s vaunted secrecy
have been so deeply penetrated by a mere analyst in training at a
regional base in Oahu? The perpetrator himself could not be asked if
he was in Moscow pointing to the “incompetence” of the NSA in his
Moscow interviews. What was known, though, was that the young
man who had taken the “queen” from the board had gained entry to
the NSA’s secret chambers through the back door, a portal opened to
him by the NSA’s reliance on outside contractors.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 208
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 20
The NSA’s Back Door
You have private for- profit companies doing inherently governmental
work like targeted espionage, surveillance, compromising
foreign systems. And there’s very little oversight, there’s very
little review.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
Prior to snowden’s theft of NSA documents, the single most
shattering blow to the confidence of the U.S. intelligence community
was the 1994 exposure of Aldrich Ames as a long- serving
Russian mole in the CIA. Ames, it will be recalled, had been a highranking
CIA officer, working at the CIA’s Counterintelligence Center
Analysis Group, before he was arrested by the FBI. He had also
worked as a mole for Russian intelligence.
In a plea bargain to avoid a death sentence (he was sentenced to
life imprisonment), he admitted that he had successfully burrowed
into the CIA and had worked there for over nine years on behalf of
the KGB. His description of his sub- rosa activities as a mole was part
of the plea bargain. This stunning revelation shook the CIA leadership
to its core. Until then, CIA executives steadfastly denied that it
was possible that the KGB could sustain a mole in American intelligence.
The Ames arrest also led the NSA to reassess its own vulnerability
to penetration. Could there be an Ames inside the NSA?
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 209
9/30/16 8:13 AM
210 | how america lost its secrets
The question was considered by the NSA’s National Threat Operations
Center, the same unit from which Edward Snowden later
stole a huge trove of secret documents. According to a report in 1996
titled “Out of Control” (later released by the NSA), the danger of
an Ames- type penetration could not be excluded. Even though the
“threat officer” who wrote this report was not identified by name,
his analysis proved incredibly prescient. He said that the NSA’s drive
to enhance its performance by networking its computers would
result in the intelligence services’ putting “all their classified information
‘eggs’ into one very precarious basket.” The basket was the
computer networks run by technicians called system administrators.
He pointed out that the NSA was becoming increasingly dependent
on such networked computer systems, and he predicted that the
NSA’s “Aldrich Ames,” as he put it, would be a “system administrator,”
which was the position that Edward Snowden held nearly two
decades later at Dell when he began stealing secrets.
The NSA’s system administrators were, as the threat officer
pointed out, very different from the traditional military employees
at the NSA. They were usually civilians who effectively served as
repairmen for complex computer systems. Moreover, many of them
had not been directly hired by the NSA. Instead, their recruitment
had been privatized to outside contractors.
This outsourcing had deep roots tracing back to World War II. Ed
Booz and Jim Allen, the founders of Booz Allen Hamilton, obtained
contracts to help manage ship construction from the U.S. Navy.
After the war ended, they sought contracts for their firm in classified
work. These contracts grew in size as the NSA needed more
and more system administrators and other information technologists
to manage the computer networks. These system administrators
needed to be given special privileges to do their service job. One
such privilege allowed them to bypass password protection. Another
privilege allowed then to temporarily transfer data to an external
storage device while they repaired computers. These two privileges
greatly increased the risk of a massive breach. Seeing them as the
weak link in the chain, the threat officer wrote in the report that
“system administrators are likely to be increasingly targeted by for-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 210
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The NSA’s Back Door | 211
eign intelligence services because of their special access to information.”
Before the computerization of the NSA, the threat officer noted,
code clerks and other low- level NSA communicators had been the
targets of adversary intelligence services. But the increasing reliance
on computer technicians presented foreign intelligence services
with much richer targets. He predicted that they would adapt their
recruiting to this new reality. Specifically, he argued that adversary
intelligence services would now focus their attention on system
administrators. “With system administrators,” he said, “the situation
is potentially much worse than it has ever been with communicators.”
The reason, he explained, was that “system administrators
can so easily, and quickly, steal vast quantities of information.”
He further suggested that because system administrators are
often drawn from the counterculture of hacking, they are more
likely to be vulnerable to an adversary service using a fake identity
for its approach, or a “false flag.” A “false flag” was a term originally
applied to a pirate ship that temporarily hoisted any flag that would
allow it to gain proximity to its intended prey, but in modern times
it describes a technique employed by espionage services to surreptitiously
lure a prospect. False flags were a staple used by the KGB
in espionage recruitment during the Cold War. They were usually
employed when a target for recruitment was not ideologically disposed
to assisting the intelligence service. To overcome that problem,
recruiters hide their true identities and adopt a more sympathetic,
bogus one.
In 1973, the KGB, working through one of its agents in the U.S.
Navy, used the false flag of Israel to recruit Jerry Alfred Whitworth,
who served as a communications officer with a top secret clearance
for the navy. Like many other KGB recruits, Whitworth came from
a broken family, dropped out of high school, took technical courses,
and got a job as a communications officer. He was not disposed to
working for Russia. But he was willing to steal enciphered and
plain text cables to help in the defense of Israel. After he was thoroughly
compromised by his espionage work, he was told by the KGB
recruiter that he was actually working for Russia, but by this time
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 211
9/30/16 8:13 AM
212 | how america lost its secrets
he was too deeply compromised to quit. He continued his espionage
work for another eight years. (Whitworth, who was arrested by the
FBI in 1985, was convicted of espionage and sentenced to 365 years
in prison.)
The Internet provided an almost ideal environment for false flags
because its users commonly adopt aliases, screen names, and other
avatars. The threat officer explained how easy it would be for the
KGB to adapt such a false flag when dealing with a dissident system
administrator working for U.S. intelligence. As the threat officer
pointed out in his report, the KGB had used false flags in the late
1980s to surreptitiously recruit members of the “German Hanover
Hackers,” a community of anarchistic hackers who breached computer
networks for fun and profit. Until then, these hacktivists stole
corporate and private passwords, credit card information, and other
privileged documents as a form of freelance espionage. Because of
their fervent anti- authority ideology, the KGB disguised its recruiters
as fellow hacktivists. The KGB succeeded in getting the Hanover
hackers to steal log- in account identifications, source codes, and other
information from U.S. government computer networks.
The weak link of system administrators became increasingly relevant
as the NSA moved further into the digital age. By the beginning
of this century, its growing networks of computers were largely
operated by civilian technicians, including system administrators,
infrastructure analysts, and information technologists, who were
needed to keep the system running. Despite the warning by the
threat officer, the NSA became more and more reliant on these outsiders
as it reorganized to meet its new mandates for surveillance of
the Internet in the war on terrorism.
The NSA had to compete with technology companies, such as
Google, Apple, and Facebook, for the services of experienced IT
workers. Though Booz Allen had been providing technically trained
specialists to the government since the 1940s and ’50s, congressionally
imposed salary caps put the NSA at a disadvantage to private
firms in its recruitment efforts. As a result, it increasingly contracted
with private firms to find talent, especially in the rush for data-based
intelligence following 9/11. Booz Allen, to meet increased demand,
recruited civilian technicians from many unconventional areas,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 212
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The NSA’s Back Door | 213
including the hacking culture. Ex- hackers who lacked (or shunned)
employment opportunities in the corporate sector were suitable
candidates for the system administrator jobs that these firms had
contracted to supply the NSA. In the rush to expand, little heed was
paid to the 1996 warning that this hacking culture might provide
a portal to anti- government hacktivist groups. The NSA became
so enamored with this new computer technology that it neglected
the security implications of employing outsiders to service it. “All
of us just fell in love with the ease and convenience and scale [of
electronic storage],” General Hayden, who headed the NSA at the
time, said to The Wall Street Journal in 2015. “So we decided to take
things we used to keep if not in a safe, at least in our desk drawer,
and put it up here [in a computer network], where it’s by definition
more vulnerable.” Making matters even worse, as has previously
been discussed, the NSA stripped away much of the so- called stovepiping
that insulated highly sensitive data from the NSA’s other
computer networks. FBI Director Mueller, in his “Statement Before
the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs,”described a decade of post–9/11 intelligence reorganization
thus: “One of the first steps was to centralize control and management
of counterterrorism operations at headquarters to avoid the
‘stove-piping’ of information on terrorism cases in the 56 individual
field offices across the country.” Here the NSA was merely following
the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to make their data
more accessible to other agencies concerned with potential terrorist
attacks, but as a result, the inner sanctum of the NSA became more
open to its new army of civilian technicians.
By 2013, much of the job of managing the NSA’s classified computers
had been handed over to a handful of private companies: Booz
Allen Hamilton, which handled the most highly secret work; Dell
SecureWorks; Microsoft; Raytheon; and IBM. In many respects,
these five companies acted less like management consultants and
more like temporary employment agencies in finding for the NSA
the computer specialists who had the necessary security clearances.
The NSA found that the universe of independent contractors was
governed by very different considerations from that of intelligence
services. Unlike intelligence services, their fate depended on turning
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 213
9/30/16 8:13 AM
214 | how america lost its secrets
profits. Because the value of their contracts was largely limited by
competitive bidding, their business plans were predicated on their
ability to minimize the costs of fulfilling these contracts. Their principal
cost was the salaries they paid their independent contractors.
Their business plans therefore depended on finding large numbers
of computer technicians in the private realm willing to work at an
NSA base at relatively low wages. This task became more difficult as
many potential recruits could find higher- paying employment with
more of a future in the burgeoning private sphere. But the companies
could also increase their revenue streams by getting additional
contracts, which, in turn, meant recruiting even more workers.
Such a business plan could hardly afford to give the highest priority
to the low probability of a security risk. In the private sector,
there is usually an unambiguous external measure of failure. An
automobile company such as General Motors can measure the performance
of its executives by reckoning its change in net income.
With secret intelligence work, the metrics for failure are far less
clear. This curious aspect of secret work was part of the advice given
to a White House lawyer in the Obama administration seeking a
position with the NSA in 2012, who was told that among the advantages
of working for a super-secret agency was that if one errs or
has a failure, “it stays secret.” The Snowden case showed that not all
failures stay secret.
The NSA can certainly quantify the amount of data it is intercepting,
but it obviously cannot count the intelligence that it misses. The
a priori proposition in the intelligence game is that “what is successfully
hidden is never found.” But one failure that cannot be hidden
is a security breach in which a perpetrator uses NSA data to publicly
expose the NSA’s sources.
Until the Snowden breach in 2013, the NSA had experienced only
one such public failure. It was the capture by North Korea in 1968 of
the USS Pueblo, which had been carrying out highly sensitive electronic
communications interception for the NSA. The Pueblo crew
failed to destroy the NSA’s encoding machines, which were flown
to Russia several days later. It was a horrible, costly breach. The
Snowden breach was much worse because, among the thousands of
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 214
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The NSA’s Back Door | 215
documents he stole, he selected lists of the NSA’s secret sources in
adversary nations.
The Snowden breach was a failure that directly traced back to the
NSA’s largest and most trusted contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton,
calling into question the vexing issue of privatizing secret intelligence.
Booz Allen, like other private firms that did work for the government,
was in the business to make money. Indeed, it had found
government contracts so much more profitable than its work in
the private sector that it sold its private sector unit to Price Waterhouse.
The profitability of government work led the Carlyle Group’s
private equity fund to acquire a controlling stake in Booz Allen in
July 2008. By 2013, it had increased its revenue by more than $1.3
billion by expanding its government contracts. Even more impressive,
its operating profit on these contracts had doubled. It did not
need to increase its core internal staff to achieve these profits, it just
had to hire outside contractors. In 2008, Booz Allen claimed 20,000
employees on its internal staff; in 2013, it claimed fewer than 5,000.
The resulting “reduced headcount,” according to its January 30,
2013, quarterly report, greatly decreased its costs for incentive pay.
It mainly accomplished this reduction by expanding the number of
outside contractors it employed, 8,000 in these five years, by one
Wall Street analyst’s calculation. They were employed as system
administrators, infrastructure analysts, computer security specialists,
and other “geek squad” jobs at the NSA and other government
agencies. Their main qualification was their prior security clearances
(which as mentioned earlier saved Booz Allen the expense of vetting
them and also the loss of income while waiting many months for a
clearance).
Snowden therefore was highly desirable for Booz Allen from an
economic point of view. Even though he had no prior experience as
an infrastructure analyst, and he had been detected being untruthful
about his degree in computer sciences, he not only had a SCI security
clearance but was willing to take a cut in pay. In keeping with
the Booz Allen business plan, such a recruit provided another cog in
its profit machine.
Not only had the NSA outsourced much of its computer opera-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 215
9/30/16 8:13 AM
216 | how america lost its secrets
tions to private companies, but the Clinton administration in 1996
had privatized background checks for government employees
requiring security clearances. The idea, backed by Vice President
Al Gore, was to reduce the size of the federal government by outsourcing
investigating the backgrounds of millions of government
applicants for jobs. The task had previously been performed by the
FBI, but it was assumed that a profit- making business could do it
faster and more efficiently. The private company named U.S. Investigations
Services was purchased in 2007 for $1.5 billion by Providence
Equity Partners, a rapidly expanding investment firm founded
in 1989 by graduates of Duke, Brown University, and the Harvard
Business School. So like Booz Allen, USIS was backed by a hedge
fund determined to make money by systematically cutting the cost
of a service previously carried out by the government.
But such outsourcing had drawbacks. For one thing, unlike the
FBI, USIS lacked the investigative clout to gain entry to certain government
agencies. A Congressional review found that the privacy
act permits disclosure of government agency records to the private
firm if they are part of a “routine use of the records,” but intelligence
agencies did not consider all such requests to be “routine. For example,
when it did the background check on Snowden in 2011, it could
not get access to his CIA file. The “derog” in his file might have set
off alarm bells, as might the fear that he had been threatened by an
internal investigation over his alleged computer tampering in 2009.
The FBI might have learned this about Snowden if it had done his
background check.
The lack of adequate oversight was another problem. USIS closed
cases and cleared applicants without completing an adequate investigation.
According to a U.S. government suit filed in 2014, USIS
had prematurely closed over 665,000 investigations in order to get
paid for them more quickly. Because the more cases it completed
each month, the more money it received from the government, the
lawsuit alleged that USIS employees often “flushed” or ended cases
before completing a full investigation to meet corporate- imposed
quotas for getting bonuses. One employee, in an e- mail cited in the
government’s complaint, said they “flushed everything like a dead
goldfish.” As a result, some information specialists entering the NSA
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 216
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The NSA’s Back Door | 217
through the back door of outside contractors were not fully vetted.
(On August 20, 2015, USIS agreed to forfeit $30 million in fees to
settle the lawsuit.)
USIS was also open to sophisticated hacking attacks by outsiders.
In August 2014, the Department of Homeland Security’s counterintelligence
unit discovered such a massive and persistent breach
in USIS that it shut down its entire exchange of data with it. The
intrusion into USIS records in this case was attributed to hackers in
China most likely linked to the Chinese intelligence service. Such
massive intrusions dated back to 2011. USIS’s lack of security in its
website left a gaping hole through which outside parties, including
Chinese and Russian hackers, could learn both the identity and the
background information of specialists applying for jobs at the NSA.
These private companies also did not sufficiently protect the personal
data of their independent contractors working at the NSA.
The hackers’ group Anonymous took credit for the successful 2011
attack on the Booz Allen Hamilton servers. It also cracked the algorithms
used to protect employees. It next injected so- called Trojan
horse viruses and other malicious codes into Booz Allen servers
that allowed it future entry. If amateur hackers such as Anonymous
could break into the computers of the NSA’s largest contractor, so
could adversaries’ state espionage services with far more advanced
hacking tools. From these sites, China or Russia could obtain all the
job applications and personal résumés submitted to contractors such
as Booz Allen. It could then compile a list of the best candidates to
do its bidding.
These deficiencies in the private sector were compounded by
the failure of security in the government’s own Office of Personnel
Management. It used a computer system called e- QIP in which
intelligence employees, including outside contractors, updated their
computerized records to maintain or upgrade their security clearances.
For example, Snowden updated his clearance in 2011. To do
so, these employees constantly updated their financial and personal
information. As it turned out, there was a major hole in the e- QIP
system. It has repeatedly been hacked by unknown parties since
2010. In 2015, the U.S. government told Congress that China was
most likely responsible, but Russia and other nations with sophis-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 217
9/30/16 8:13 AM
218 | how america lost its secrets
ticated cyber services could have also participated in the hacking. In
any case, the records of over nineteen million employees, including
intelligence workers, became available to a hostile intelligence service.
This breach would allow hostile services to obtain a great deal
of information about independent contractors working at the NSA.
They could then use this data to follow the movements of any of
these intelligence workers they deemed of interest.
Despite all the potential flaws in it, the outsourcing system continued
in place. It even featured a revolving door through which Booz
Allen hired retiring executives from the intelligence services, such
as the former NSA director Michael McConnell; James Woolsey, a
former director of the CIA; and the retired general James Clapper,
who later served as director of national intelligence.
The cozy relationship between the private firms and the NSA
notwithstanding, the NSA leadership operated as if it were unaware
that outsourcing could create a security problem. As far back as
2005 General Hayden, then the departing head of the NSA, had
been warned of one such vulnerability in a memorandum written
by a counterintelligence officer at the NSA. Like the earlier 1996
report by the threat officer, this memorandum noted the NSA had
ceded responsibility for managing its secret systems to outsiders and
warned that the NSA’s reliance on them to manage its computers
had opened a back door into the NSA. In addition, it warned that
once an outside contractor managed to slip in through this back door,
he could easily jump from one outsourcer to another. This was what
Snowden did when he moved from Dell to Booz Allen Hamilton in
2013.
Despite its security flaws, outsourcing seemed to provide a number
of advantages to the NSA. For one thing, it provided a means for
circumventing the budget restrictions imposed by Congress on hiring
new employees. In addition, because private companies had less
rigid hiring standards, it greatly expanded the pool of young system
administrators by tapping into computer cultures that would be
antagonistic to working directly for the government. Finally, it drew
less on NSA resources. Because these information technologists
were only temporary employees, they were not entitled to military
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 218
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The NSA’s Back Door | 219
pensions, paid medical leave, and other benefits. It was a system that
effectively replaced military careerists with freelancers.
The irony of the situation was that the NSA had surrounded its
front doors with rings of barbed wire, closed- circuit cameras, and
armed guards, but for reasons of economy, bureaucratic restrictions,
and convenience it had left the back door of outsourcing open to
temporary employees of private companies, even though it might
take some time for them to gain entry to its inner sanctum.
“It was not a question of if but when one of the contractors would
go rogue,” the former NSA executive who wrote the 2015 memorandum
told me. Snowden answered that question in 2013. Even more
extraordinary than the theft itself was the reaction to it by the NSA.
It turned out that there was no cost of failure levied against the outside
contractor Booz Allen, which had employed Snowden when he
bypassed its security regime to steal the keys to the kingdom. Even
though the counterintelligence investigation showed Snowden stole
documents from compartments to which he did not have access, the
NSA did not penalize Booz Allen. Instead, its revenues and profits
from government contracts markedly increased between 2013 and
2015.
Nor did the NSA alter its reliance on private contractors. The back
door to the NSA remained wide open. Outsourcing to private companies
has become an all but irreplaceable part of the intelligence
system in America, Snowden’s actions, and the risk of future similar
actions, notwithstanding.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 219
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 21
The Russians Are Coming
The collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster
of the century.
— vladimir putin
In the first invasion of a European country since the end of
the Cold War, Russian military forces moved into the Crimea and
other parts of eastern Ukraine in February and March 2014. Unlike
with previous Russian troop movements, such as those into Poland,
Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and East Germany during the Cold War,
the weeklong massing of Russian elite troops and sophisticated
equipment for the move into Ukraine almost totally evaded detection
by the NSA’s surveillance. Never before had the NSA’s multibilliondollar
armada of sensors and other apparatus for intercepting signals
missed such a massive military operation. According to a report in
The Wall Street Journal that cited Pentagon sources, Russian units
had managed to hide all electronic traces of their elaborate preparations.
If so, after more than half a century of attempted penetrations,
Russia had apparently found a means of stymieing the interception
capabilities of the NSA.
Putin had firm ideas about restoring Russia’s power in the post–
Cold War era. A formidable KGB officer before he became president
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 220
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Russians Are Coming | 221
of the Russian Federation in 2000, he made no secret that his goal
was to prevent the United States from obtaining what he termed
“global hegemony.” His logic was clear. He judged the breakup of
the Soviet Union in 1991 to be, as he put it, “a geopolitical disaster.”
He argued that the breakup had provided the United States with the
means to become the singular dominant power in the world.
He sought to prevent that outcome by moving aggressively to
redress this loss of Russian power. He upgraded Russia’s nuclear
force, modernized Russia’s elite military units, and greatly strengthened
Russia’s relations with China. The last measure was essential
because China was Russia’s principal ally in opposing the extension
of American dominance. Yet there was still an immense gap between
them and the United States in communications intelligence.
Since the breakup of the Soviet Union, the NSA had continued to
build up its technological capabilities, while Russia teetered on the
edge of collapse in the early 1990s. But as previously mentioned,
the NSA’s legal mandate had been limited by Congress to foreign
interceptions (at least prior to 9/11). As a result, it was required to
separate out domestic from foreign surveillance, a massive process
that not only was time- consuming but could generate dissidence
within the ranks of American intelligence. It also could not legally
use its surveillance machinery to monitor the telephones and Internet
activities of the tens of thousands of civilian contractors who ran
its computer networks— at least not unless the FBI began an investigation
into them.
Here the Russian intelligence services had a clear advantage. They
had a lawful mandate to intercept any and all domestic communications.
In fact, a compulsory surveillance system called by its Russian
acronym SORM had been incorporated into Russian law in 1995.
It requires the FSB and seven other Russian security agencies to
monitor all forms of domestic communications including telephones
(SORM- 1), e- mails and other Internet activity (SORM- 2), and computer
data storage of billing information (SORM- 3). Not only did
Russia run a nationwide system of Internet filtering in 2013, but it
required its telecommunication companies to furnish it with worldwide
data.
The NSA also had to deal with many peripheral issues other than
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 221
9/30/16 8:13 AM
222 | how america lost its secrets
the activities of Russia and China. It was charged with monitoring
nuclear proliferation in Iran, Pakistan, and North Korea, potential
jihadist threats everywhere in the world, and much else. The
Russian foreign intelligence service, the SVR, could put its limited
resources to work on redressing the gap with its main enemy: the
United States.
Nevertheless, Putin had to reckon with the reality in 2013 that
Russia could not compete with the NSA in the business of intercepting
communications. And if the NSA could listen in on all the
internal activities of its spy agencies and security regime, the ability
of Putin to use covert means to achieve his other global ambitions
would be impaired. In the cold peace that replaced the Cold War,
Russia had little hope of realizing these ambitions unless it could
weaken the NSA’s iron- tight grip on global communications intelligence.
One way to remedy the imbalance between Russian intelligence
and the NSA was via espionage. Here the SVR would be the
instrument, and the immediate objective would be to acquire the
NSA’s lists of its sources in Russia. If successful, it would be a game
changer.
Such an ambitious penetration of the NSA, to be sure, was a tall
order for Russian intelligence. Most of its moles recruited in the
NSA by the KGB had been code clerks, guards, translators, and lowlevel
analysts. They provided documents about the NSA’s cipher
breaking, but they lacked access to the lists of the NSA’s sources and
methods. These meager results did not inhibit Russian efforts. For
six decades, ever since the inception of the NSA in 1952, the Russian
intelligence service had engaged in a covert war with the NSA.
The Russian intelligence service is, as far as is known, the only
intelligence service in the world that ever succeeded in penetrating
the NSA. A number of NSA employees also defected to Moscow.
The history of this venerable enterprise is instructive.
The first two defectors in the NSA’s history were William Martin
and Bernon Mitchell. They were mathematicians working on the
NSA’s decryption machines who went to Moscow via Cuba in 1960.
The Russian intelligence service, then called the KGB, went to great
lengths to get propaganda value from their defections. It even organized
a ninety- minute press conference for them on September 6,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 222
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Russians Are Coming | 223
1960, at the Hall of Journalists and invited all the foreign correspondents
in Moscow. Before television cameras, the defectors denounced
the NSA’s activities. Martin told how the NSA breached international
laws by spying on Germany, Britain, and other NATO allies.
Mitchell, for his part, suggested that the NSA’s practice of breaking
international laws could ignite a nuclear war. Indeed, he justified
their joint defection to Russia in heroic whistle- blowing terms,
saying, “We would attempt to crawl to the moon if we thought it
would lessen the threat of an atomic war.” The NSA review of the
case, however, assessed that little damage had been done, because the
NSA quickly changed the codes they had compromised. It noted,
“The Communist spymasters would undoubtedly have preferred
Martin and Mitchell to remain in place as moles, since their information
was dated as of the moment they left NSA.”
The next NSA defector was Victor Norris Hamilton, a translator
and analyst at the NSA. He arrived in Moscow in 1962, and like
Mitchell and Martin he claimed the status of a whistle- blower. This
time, the KGB provided a newspaper platform. Writing in the Russian
newspaper Izvestia, Hamilton revealed the extent of U.S. spying
on its allies in the Middle East.
None of these three 1960s defectors revealed what, if any, NSA
secret documents they had compromised. Nor did any of them ever
return to the United States. Martin changed his name to Vladimir
Sokolodsky, married a Russian woman, and died in Mexico City on
January 17, 1987. Mitchell vanished from sight and was reported to
have died in St. Petersburg on November 12, 2001. Hamilton, after
telling Russian authorities stories about hearing voices in his head
because of an NSA device implanted in his brain, was consigned to
Special Psychiatric Hospital No. 5 outside Moscow.
There were also KGB spies in the NSA who were caught or died
before they could defect. One of them was Sergeant Jack Dunlap.
He was found dead of carbon monoxide poisoning in his garage on
July 23, 1963. Although there was no suicide note, his death was
ruled an apparent suicide. NSA classified documents were later discovered
in his house. After that, NSA investigators unraveled his
decade- long career as a KGB mole. Dunlap had been recruited by the
KGB in Turkey in 1952. The standard KGB tool kit for recruitment
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 223
9/30/16 8:13 AM
224 | how america lost its secrets
was called MICE. It stood for Money, Ideology, Compromise, and
Ego. The KGB used the first element, money, to compromise Dunlap.
After he was compromised, it exploited him by getting him to steal
NSA secrets. He had access to such secrets because he became the
personal driver to Major General Garrison Coverdale, the chief of
staff of the NSA. After Coverdale retired, he became the driver for
his successor, General Thomas Watlington. These positions afforded
him a security clearance and, even more important, a “no inspection”
status for the commanding general’s cars that he drove. This
perk allowed him to leave the base with secret documents, have them
photocopied by his KGB case officer, and then return them to the files
at the NSA base before anyone else knew they were missing. He also
used, likely at the suggestion of the KGB case officers, his “no inspection”
perk to offer other NSA employees a way of earning money.
He would smuggle off the base any items of government property
that they took. Once he had compromised them through thefts, he
was in a position to ask them for intelligence favors. This NSA ring
could not be fully investigated because of his untimely death. Other
than the packets of undelivered NSA documents found in his home,
the investigation was never able to assess the total extent of the KGB
penetration of NSA secrets. (Angleton suspected Dunlap was murdered
by the KGB in what he termed a surreptitiously assisted death,
to prevent Dunlap from talking to investigators.)
The Russian intelligence services continued recruiting mercenary
spies in the NSA for the duration of the Cold War. The KGB successes
included Robert Lipka, a clerk at the NSA in the mid- 1960s,
who was caught in a sting operation by the FBI and sentenced to
eighteen years in a federal prison. Ronald Pelton, an NSA analyst,
was recruited after he retired from the NSA. After he was betrayed
by a KGB double agent in 1985, he was sentenced to life imprisonment.
Finally, there was David Sheldon Boone, an NSA code clerk,
who between 1988 and 1992 provided the KGB with NSA documents
in return for $60,000. Boone, sentenced to twenty- four years
in prison, was the last known KGB recruitment of the Cold War.
During the Cold War, Russian intelligence service officers operated
mainly under the cover of the embassies, consulates, United
Nations delegations, and other diplomatic missions of the Soviet
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 224
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Russians Are Coming | 225
Union. As “diplomats,” they were protected from arrest by the terms
of the 1961 Treaty of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
Their diplomatic cover, however, greatly limited their field for finding
potential recruits outside their universe of international meetings,
diplomatic receptions, UN organizations, scientific conferences,
and cultural exchanges. They therefore tended to recruit their counterparts
in adversary services.
In this regard, the successful entrapment of Harold Nicholson
in the 1990s is highly instructive. From his impressive record, he
seemed an unlikely candidate for recruitment. He had been a superpatriotic
American who had served as a captain in army intelligence
before joining the CIA in 1980. In the CIA, he had an unblemished
record as a career officer, serving as a station chief in Eastern
Europe and then the deputy chief of operations in Malaysia in 1992.
Even though his career was on the rise and he was a dedicated anti-
Communist, he became a target for the SVR when he was assigned
to the CIA’s elite Russian division. Because the job of this division
was to recruit Russian officials working abroad as diplomats, engineers,
and military officers, its operations brought its officers in close
contact with SVR officers. Nicholson therefore was required to meet
with Russian intelligence officers in Manila, Bucharest, Tokyo, and
Bangkok and “dangle” himself to the SVR by feigning disloyalty to
the CIA.
As part of these deception operations, Nicholson supplied the
Russians with tidbits of CIA secrets, or “chickenfeed,” that had been
approved by his superiors at the CIA. What his CIA superiors did
not fully take into account in this spy- versus- spy game was the
SVR’s ability to manipulate, compromise, and convert a “dangle” to
its own ends. As it turned out, Russian intelligence had been assembling
a psychological profile on Nicholson since the late 1980s and
found vulnerability: his resentment at the failure of his superiors
to recognize his achievements in intelligence. The Russians played
on this vulnerability to compromise him and then converted him to
becoming its mole inside the CIA.
Nicholson worked for the SVR first in Asia; then he was given a
management position at CIA headquarters, which is located in Langley,
Virginia. Among other secret documents, he provided the SVR
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 225
9/30/16 8:13 AM
226 | how america lost its secrets
with the identities of CIA officers sent to the CIA’s special training
school at Fort Peary, Virginia, which opened the door for the SVR to
make other potential recruitments. Meanwhile, it paid him $300,000
before he was finally arrested by the FBI in November 1996. (After
his conviction for espionage, he was sentenced to twenty- three years
in federal prison.) The CIA postmortem on Nicholson, who was the
highest- ranking CIA officer ever recruited (as far as is known), made
clear that even a loyal American, with no intention of betraying the
United States, could be entrapped in the spy game.
When it comes to recruiting moles in a larger universe, intelligence
services operate much like highly specialized corporate “headhunters,”
as James Jesus Angleton described the process to me during
the Cold War era. He was referring to the similar approach that corporate
human resource divisions had with espionage agencies. Both
headhunt by searching through a database of candidates for possible
recruits to fill specific positions. Both types of organizations have
researchers at their disposal to draw up rosters of potential recruits.
Both sort through available databases to determine which of the
names on the list have attributes that might qualify or disqualify
them for a recruitment pitch. Both also collect personal data on each
qualified candidate, including any indication of his or her ideological
leaning, political affiliations, financial standing, ambitions, and vanities,
to help them make a tempting offer.
But there are two important differences. First, unlike their counterparts
in the private sector, espionage headhunters ask their
candidates not only to take on a new job but also to keep their
employment secret from their present employer. Second, they ask
them to surreptitiously steal documents from him. Because they are
asking candidates to break the law, espionage services, unlike their
corporate counterparts in headhunting, obviously need to initially
hide from the candidates the dangerous nature of the work they will
do. Depending on the targeted recruit, they might disguise the task
as a heroic act, such as righting an injustice, exposing an illegal government
activity, or countering a regime of tyranny. This disguise is
called in the parlance of the trade a false flag, as mentioned earlier.
By using such a false flag, the SVR did not need to find a candidate
who was sympathetic to Russia or the Putin regime. In its long
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 226
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Russians Are Coming | 227
history dating back to the era of the czars, Russian intelligence had
perfected the technique of false flag recruitment, through which it
assumes an identity to fit the ideological bent of a potential recruit.
Russian intelligence was well experienced with false flags. It first
used this technique following the Bolshevik revolution in 1917 to
control dissidents both at home and abroad. The centerpiece, as later
analyzed by the CIA, was known as the “Trust” deception. It began
in August 1921 when a high- ranking official of the Communist
regime in Russia named Aleksandr Yakushev slipped away from a
Soviet trade delegation in Estonia and sought out a leading anti-
Communist exile he had known before the revolution in Russia. He
then told him that he represented a group of disillusioned officials in
Russia that included key members of the secret police, the army, and
the Interior Ministry. Yakushev said that they all had come to the
same conclusion: the Communist experiment in Russia had totally
failed and needed to be replaced. To effect this regime change, they
had formed an underground organization code- named the Trust,
because the cover for their conspiratorial activities was the Moscow
headquarters of the Municipal Credit Association, which was a trust
company. According to Yakushev’s account, it had become the equivalent
of a de facto government by 1921.
The exiled leader in Estonia reported this astonishing news to
British intelligence, which, along with French and American intelligence,
helped fund this newly emerged anti- Communist group.
Initially, British intelligence had doubts about the bona fides of the
Trust, as did other Western intelligence services sponsoring exile
groups. But they gradually accepted it after they received intelligence
reports confirming its operations from many other sources,
including Russian officials, diplomats, and military officers who
claimed to have defected from the Soviet government. Because these
reports all dovetailed, they recognized the Trust as a legitimately
underground organization.
Once the Trust had been established in the minds of the Western
intelligence services, it offered them as well as exile groups the
services of its network of collaborators. These services included
smuggling out dissidents, stealing secret documents, and disbursing
money inside Russia to sympathizers. Within a year, exile groups in
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 227
9/30/16 8:13 AM
228 | how america lost its secrets
Paris, Berlin, Vienna, and Helsinki were using the Trust to deliver
arms and supplies to their partisans inside Russia. The Trust also
furnished spies’ and exiled leaders’ fake passports, which allowed
them to sneak back into Russia to participate in clandestine missions.
It even undertook sabotage and assassination missions paid for
by Western intelligence services. As they learned of police stations
being blown up and political prisoners escaped from prisons, these
agents and dissidents came to further believe in the power of the
Trust.
By the mid- 1920s, no fewer than eleven Western intelligence
services had become almost completely dependent on the Trust for
information about Russia. They also sent millions of dollars into
Russia via couriers to finance its activities.
But suddenly exiled leaders working in Russia under the aegis
of the Trust began to vanish. Then top Western intelligence agents,
including Sidney Reilly and Boris Savinkov, were arrested, and their
networks were eliminated. Instead of the Communist regime collapsing,
as the Trust had predicted, it consolidated its power and
wiped out all the dissident groups. Finally, in 1929, the Trust was
revealed by a defector to be a long- term false flag operation run by
the Russian intelligence service. Even the Trust building, rather than
being the cover for a subversive conspiracy, was the headquarters
for the Russian secret police during this eight- year operation. The
secret police had provided the documents fed to Western intelligence,
briefed the agents who pretended to defect, published the dissident
newspapers the Trust distributed, fabricated the passports it supplied
exiles, blew up Russian buildings, and staged jail breaks to make the
deception more credible. It also collected the money sent in by Western
intelligence services, which more than paid for the entire deception.
Because it was running the show, it could offer those lured into
the trap an opportunity to work for it as double agents. The alternative,
if they refused, was to face a firing squad.
Even after the Trust itself had been fully exposed, the Russian intelligence
service continued to succeed with other false flag deceptions.
During the Cold War, it set up a fake underground in Poland called
WIN, modeled on the Trust. It set up false flag groups in Ukraine,
Georgia, Lithuania, Albania, and Hungary. It also had agents mas-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 228
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Russians Are Coming | 229
querade as members of the security services of Israel, South Africa,
Germany, France, and the United States to recruit unwitting agents.
These deceptions became an integral part of the recruitments of the
Russian intelligence services.
Penetrating the NSA and getting access to files from its stovepiped
computers was a far more difficult challenge for the SVR.
Approaching CIA officers, such as Nicholson, was relatively easy
because it was part of the CIA officers’ jobs to meet with their adversaries.
NSA officers, on the other hand, did not engage in “dangles”
or even attend diplomatic receptions. They had no reason, other than
a sinister one, to meet with a member of the Russian intelligence
service. Furthermore, unlike CIA officers, who, like Nicholson, are
often posted in neutral countries where they can be approached in a
social context, NSA officers work at well- guarded regional bases and
are not part of the diplomatic life. Because a known employee of a
foreign diplomatic mission could not even approach an NSA officer
without arousing suspicion, the SVR would need to use an intermediary,
called an access agent, whose affiliations were not known
to the FBI. Such an operation would require establishing a network
of illegals in America, as the SVR did after Putin became president.
Even then, the intermediary would have to find a plausible pretext
to approach the target without revealing his actual interest. Such
complex operations at the NSA, as far as is known, only yielded a
few low- level recruits.
The emergence of computer networks in the 1990s greatly
expanded the SVR’s recruiting horizon. It offered a new penetration
opportunity at the NSA: civilian technologists working under contract
for the U.S. government. Many of these civilians at the NSA,
especially the younger ones, as we know, had been drawn from the
hacking and game- playing culture; some had even taken courses on
hacking techniques. They presented the SVR with inviting targets
for recruitment. As was previously mentioned, Russian intelligence
had considerable experience in Germany with hacktivists, who
tended to be anarchists. There were also supporters of the libertarian
movement. The common denominator was often their resentment,
expressed in their postings, of the United States and its allies
attempting to limit the downloading of copyrighted music, movies,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 229
9/30/16 8:13 AM
230 | how america lost its secrets
and software on the Internet, all of which fell under the rubric of
“freedom of the Internet.” They also vocally objected to the NSA’s
using built- in back doors in its software to read their encrypted
messages. Such people were not difficult to find on the Internet.
The donors to Ron Paul’s libertarian election campaign (including
Snowden) were a matter of public record.
Even if there was no shortage of hacktivists who believed the surveillance
of the Internet by the NSA was an evil worth fighting, the
SVR still had to find a plausible way of approaching members of
this counterculture without offending them. Clearly, the SVR could
no longer use out- of- date Communist and anti- capitalist ideology
as a lure. Russia was far more authoritarian than the United States
when it came to the Internet. One viable alternative for the SVR was
custom- tailoring false flags to appeal to hacktivists.
For this purpose, the Internet provided a near- perfect realm.
Because it is a place where true identities cannot easily be verified,
intelligence services could employ a protean kit of disguises to
assume false identities to entice potential dissidents into communicating
with them. The KGB’s earlier efforts to use hacktivist groups
in Germany had produced little if any intelligence about the NSA
because of the stovepiping it used to isolate its computers from networks
that could be hacked into from the outside. It will be recalled
that the NSA threat officer had cited these failures in his 1996 report
on NSA vulnerability. He also said that efforts of the Russian intelligence
services to use false flag recruitments provided the KGB with
“a learning experience.” The KGB had learned that hacking by itself
could not breach the NSA’s protective stovepiping. He predicted that
its next logical move would be to “target insider computer personnel.”
This false flag recruitment would aim at, in his view, system
administrators, computer engineers, and cyber- service workers who
either were already inside the NSA or had a security clearance that
would facilitate getting jobs with NSA contractors.
Even with an appropriate false flag, the task of finding such a
“Prometheus” required obtaining a database of those working at
the NSA. There were some five thousand civilian technicians at the
NSA of all political stripes. Hacking into the personnel records of
the intelligence workers seeking to renew their security clearance
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 230
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Russians Are Coming | 231
was a place to begin. The Internet provided the SVR with just this
opportunity. As you will recall, holes in the security of the computer
networks of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and
USIS and the websites of the companies supplying the NSA with
independent contractors had made the background checks on American
intelligence workers available to the Chinese, and presumably
other adversary intelligence service hackers, since 2011. If the SVR
had access to this personnel data, the research for a candidate would
be greatly facilitated. From the 127- page Standard Form 86, which
each applicant for a security clearance submits, the SVR could filter
out intelligence workers employed by the NSA by their educational
background, employment history, affiliations, and foreign contacts.
It could then search this data for candidates with a possible hacktivist
profile.
This data could next be crossed with a list of individuals the SVR
knew were in contact with high- profile activists who were part of the
anti- surveillance movements. This would include core participants
in the Tor Project, WikiLeaks, Noisebridge, CryptoParties, the Freedom
of the Press Foundation, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
(Snowden, for example, had been in touch with members of all
these groups in 2012 and 2013.)
The SVR would have little problem monitoring even encrypted
communications with leading figures in the anti- surveillance world.
These activists, despite secrecy rituals such as putting their cell
phones in refrigerators, remain visible to a sophisticated intelligence
service such as the SVR. All the defensive tactics of Laura Poitras,
including PGP encryption, Tor software, and air- gapped computers
(computers that have never been connected to the Internet), did not
keep secrets about her sources entirely to herself. Snowden, at a time
when he was stealing NSA secrets in February 2013, went to great
lengths to impress on Poitras the need for operational security about
his contacts with her, but that injunction did not prevent her from
telling at least five people about her source, including Micah Lee, the
Berkeley- based technology operative for the Freedom of the Press
Foundation; Jacob Appelbaum, the Tor proselytizer; Ben Wizner, the
ACLU lawyer; Barton Gellman; and Glenn Greenwald. “It is not me
that can’t keep a secret,” Abraham Lincoln joked. “It’s the people I
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 231
9/30/16 8:13 AM
232 | how america lost its secrets
tell it to that can’t.” In the same vein, Poitras could hardly rely on
these five confidants not to tell her secrets (and Snowden’s) to others.
Hours after he was told, Greenwald told his lover, David Miranda,
about the source in great detail. He even asked him to evaluate the
source’s bona fides for him. Gellman, for his part, raised the matter
with a former high official at the Justice Department.
Moreover, as the intelligence world knew, Poitras was herself
a veritable lightning rod for attracting ex- NSA employees who
objected to some of its surveillance programs. In 2012, her previously
mentioned filming in Berlin of NSA insiders could make her
communications of interest to intelligence services that wanted to
keep tabs on possible NSA dissidents.
Nor was Snowden himself overly discreet. It will be recalled that
he had also advertised his Tor- sponsored CryptoParty activities over
the Internet and supplied Runa Sandvik, who worked with Appelbaum,
his true name and address in Hawaii. Sandvik had no reason
not to share the identity of her co- presenter with others in the Tor
movement. Snowden, of course, had his girlfriend make a video of
his presentation as well. He also bragged about operating the largest
Tor outlets in Hawaii. Even if his Tor software provided him with a
measure of anonymity, it was not beyond the ability of the worldclass
cyber services to crack it.
Under Putin, Russia had built one of the leading cyber- espionage
services in the world. According to a 2009 NSA analysis of Russian
capabilities, which was obtained by The New York Times in 2013,
Russia’s highly sophisticated tools for cyber espionage were superior
to those of China or any other adversary nation. For example, investigators
from FireEye, a well- regarded Silicon Valley security firm,
found that in 2007 Russian hackers had developed a highly sophisticated
virus that could bypass the security measures of the servers
of both the U.S. government and its private contractors. According
to one computer security expert, the virus had made protected Internet
websites “sitting ducks” for these sophisticated Russian hackers.
The cryptographer Bruce Schneier, a leading specialist in computer
security, explained, “It is next to impossible to maintain privacy and
anonymity against a well- funded government adversary.”
Nor has the Russian cyber service made a secret out of the fact that
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 232
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Russians Are Coming | 233
it targets Tor software. It even offered a cash prize to anyone in the
hacking community who could break Tor. Prior to 2013, according
to cyber- security experts, it spent over a decade building cyber tools
aimed at unraveling the Tor networks used by hacktivists, criminal
enterprises, political dissidents, and rival intelligence operatives. To
this end, it reportedly attempted to map out computers that served
as major Tor exit nodes (such as the one Snowden operated in 2012
near an NSA regional base in Hawaii). It also reportedly attached
the equivalent of “electronic ink” to messages, which would allow
it to trace the path of messages that passed through them. Through
this technology, it could tag and follow Tor users as their communications
traveled across the Internet. It could even borrow their
Internet identities. To be sure, the NSA also had such a capability.
The Silk Road founder, Ross Ulbricht, discovered to his distress that
his Tor software did not make his computer server in Iceland invisible.
According to a former top official in the Justice Department, the
NSA was able to locate it by cracking the Tor software (Ulbricht is
currently serving a life sentence for his activities). Unlike adversary
services, however, the NSA needs a warrant to investigate U.S. citizens
who use Tor.
The NSA is hardly immune from an attack on its own computers.
As the former CIA deputy director Morell wrote in his 2015 book,
The Great War of Our Time, many financial institutions have “better
cyber security than the NSA.” The Internet certainly helped make
the activities of U.S. intelligence workers visible to the SVR.
But to achieve its goals, the SVR still had to find at least one disgruntled
civilian contractor inside the NSA who had access to the
sealed- off computer networks. Did it find its man? If so, was it before
or after Snowden arrived in Hong Kong with the Level 3 NSA files?
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 233
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 22
The Chinese Puzzle
The first [false assumption] is that China is an enemy of the
United States. It’s not.
— edward snowden, Hong Kong, 2013
On august 11, 2014, in the Atlantic Ocean, an event took place
of enormous concern to U.S. intelligence. A Chinese Jin- class
submarine launched an intercontinental ballistic missile. The missile
released twelve independently targeted reentry vehicles, each simulating
a nuclear warhead. Some forty- four hundred miles away, in
China’s test range in the Xinjiang desert, each of the twelve simulated
nuclear warheads hit its target within a twelve- inch radius.
The test firing, which was closely monitored by the NSA, was a
strategic game changer. It meant that a single Jin- class submarine,
which carried twelve such missiles and 144 nuclear warheads, could
destroy every city of strategic importance in the United States. U.S.
intelligence further reported that China would soon use stealth
technology to make it more difficult to detect newer submarines and
give “China its first credible sea- based nuclear deterrent” against an
American attack.
By 2015, as its test in the Atlantic had foreshadowed, China had
armed its land- based as well as sea- based missiles with multiple
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 234
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Chinese Puzzle | 235
independently targeted warheads. Combined with the state- of- theart
technology it had licensed from Russia, its systematic use of
espionage even made it possible for China to build its own stealth
fighters.
Unlike the United States, China did not achieve this remarkable
capability to launch independently targeted miniaturized nuclear
weapons and stealth them by investing hundreds of billions of dollars
in developing them. It obtained this technology mainly through
espionage. The Chinese intelligence service stole a large part, if not
all, of America’s secret technology for weaponizing nuclear bombs
during the 1980s and 1990s. The theft was so massive that in 1998
the House of Representatives set up a special bipartisan investigative
unit called the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and
Military/Commercial Concerns with the People’s Republic of China.
Based on the intelligence amassed by the NSA, the CIA, and other
intelligence services, it concluded in its report that the Chinese intelligence
service had obtained both by electronic and by conventional
spying the warhead design of America’s seven most advanced thermonuclear
weapons. Moreover, it found that espionage successes
allowed China to so accelerate the design, development, and testing
of its own nuclear weapons that the new generation of Chinese
weapons would be “comparable in effectiveness to the weapons used
by the United States.” Further, the committee reported that these
thefts were the “results of decades of intelligence operations against
U.S. weapons laboratories.” The Chinese intelligence service further
obtained from private U.S. defense contractors through cyber espionage
important elements of the stealth technology used in advanced
planes and submarines. China shared (or exchanged) the fruits of its
espionage on nuclear warhead design with North Korea, Pakistan,
Iran, and Russia.
Despite its formidable intelligence coups in the United States, the
Chinese intelligence service managed to remain among the most
elusive of America’s intelligence adversaries. Its espionage organizations
are hidden behind layers of bureaucracy in the Ministry of
State Security, Chinese Communist Party structures, and the second,
third, and fourth department of the General Staff of the People’s
Liberation Army. Much of its cyber- espionage units are concealed
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 235
9/30/16 8:13 AM
236 | how america lost its secrets
on the campuses of its universities. Its hierarchy is also obscure.
Few traces have been uncovered of any conventional espionage networks
in the United States, and no major Chinese spy has ever been
arrested. Part of the reason that Chinese espionage has proved so elusive
to the eyes of Western counterintelligence is that, unlike Russia,
it did not ordinarily rely on intelligence officers in its embassies to
recruit penetration agents to steal secrets. It did not even have an
embassy in the United States during most of the Cold War. Instead,
its services specialize in mosaics of intelligence assembled from a
wide variety of sources, including nonclassified documents, returning
graduate students, scientific conferences, exchanges with allies,
and a vast operation of hacking into computers, or cyber espionage.
Such espionage is indeed a vast enterprise in China. Graduating
over 150,000 computer science engineers in the 1990s, it had no
shortage of personnel. It had also developed the cyber tool kit to gain
access to the computer networks of U.S. government contractors and
consultants in the private sector and government agencies, planting
“sleeper” bugs in networked computers. Like human sleeper agents,
these hidden programs can be activated when needed for operational
purposes. Chinese controllers can often retrieve e- mails and documents
and can turn on the cameras and microphones of personal
computers, tablets, and smart phones.
By 2007, Paul Strassmann, a top U.S. defense expert on cyber
espionage, reported that China had inserted “zombie” programs in
some 700,000 computers in the United States, which could be used to
mount cyber attacks to retrieve e- mails from other computers. The
Chinese service also reportedly penetrated companies that provide
Internet services, including Google, Yahoo!, Symantec, and Adobe,
which allowed it to track e- mails and enclosures of individuals. With
such an invisible army of zombie computers, it is not entirely surprising
that China finds little need to employ human sleeper agents.
Chinese cyber specialists used this capability to hack into the
computers of outside contractors, including Booz Allen and other
companies that supplied technologists to the NSA. It also had notable
successes in obtaining the dossiers of U.S. employees and independent
contractors at the NSA, the CIA, and other intelligence
services. Its intrusions, as previously noted, into computer networks
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 236
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Chinese Puzzle | 237
at the Office of Personnel Management traced back to 2009. Eventually,
by 2015, according to U.S. estimates, the cyber attack had
harvested over twenty million personnel files of past and present
federal government employees. In addition, it reaped over fourteen
million background checks of intelligence workers done by the Federal
Investigative Services.
All intelligence workers with a sensitive compartmented information
clearance, such as Snowden, were required to provide information
on these forms about all their foreign acquaintances, including
any non- U.S. officials whom the applicant knew or had had relationships
with in the past. They also had to list their foreign travel,
family members, police encounters, mental health issues, and credit
history. For good measure, Chinese hackers obtained the confidential
medical histories of government employees by hacking into the
computers of Anthem and other giant health- care companies. If
China’s intelligence services consolidated the fruits of these hacking
attacks, it would have a searchable database of almost everyone
working in the American defense and intelligence complex. From
this database, it could track individuals with high security clearances
vulnerable to being bribed, blackmailed, or tricked into cooperating.
No one doubted that the Chinese would use their cyber capabilities
to take advantage of opportunities presented in foreign computer
systems.
General Hayden said of the massive theft of intelligence personnel
records, “Those records are a legitimate foreign intelligence target.”
He added, “If I, as director of the NSA or CIA, would have
had the opportunity to grab the equivalent in the Chinese system,
I would not have thought twice.” If that opportunity did not arise
for the NSA or the CIA during Hayden’s tenure, it might have been
because no insider in the Chinese intelligence services provided U.S.
intelligence with a road map to it.
Cyber espionage was not the Chinese intelligence service’s only
powerful resource in the intelligence war. To get both electronic
intelligence and human intelligence about the United States, China
also had a highly productive intelligence- sharing treaty with Russia.
It was signed in 1992 after the Soviet Union was dissolved. Although
the terms of this exchange remain secret, defectors from the Rus-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 237
9/30/16 8:13 AM
238 | how america lost its secrets
sian KGB and SVR reported that Chinese intelligence received from
Russia a continuous stream of communications intelligence about
the United States in the late twentieth and early twenty- first centuries.
Russia’s intelligence resources during this period were formidable.
They included geosynchronous satellites, listening stations
in Cuba, sleeper agents, and embassy- based spy networks. Presumably,
this relationship further deepened under President Putin’s
regime. Putin asserted in speeches in 2014 that Russia and China
continued to share a key strategic objective: countering the United
States’ domination of international relations, or what Putin terms
“a unipolar world order.” China’s president, Xi Jinping, expressed a
very similar view, saying in 2014 in a thinly veiled reference to the
United States that any attempt to “monopolize” international affairs
will not succeed.
Since the end of the Cold War, Russia has been the major supplier
of almost all of China’s modern weaponry. It licenses for manufacture
in China avionics, air defense systems, missile launchers, stealth
technology, and submarine warfare equipment. To make these arms
effective, it also provides China with up- to- date intelligence about
the ability of the United States and its allies to counter them. While
such intelligence cooperation may be limited by the reality that
China and Russia still compete in many areas, they still have reason
to share much of the fruits of their cyber and conventional espionage
against the NSA in accordance with their intelligence. After all,
the NSA works to intercept the military and political secrets of both
these allies. Moreover, as the CIA’s former deputy director Morell
points out in his book, NSA secrets are a form of currency for adversaries
in the global intelligence war, saying that part of Snowden’s
cache could be traded by a country that acquired it to the intelligence
services of Iran and North Korea.
Snowden’s stay in Hong Kong from May 20 to June 23 in 2013
made the Chinese intelligence service, willy- nilly, a potential player
in whatever game he was involved in. China’s full responsibility for
Hong Kong’s national security and foreign affairs includes monitoring
foreign intelligence operatives. Chinese intelligence main-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 238
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Chinese Puzzle | 239
tains there its largest intelligence base outside mainland China. A
large contingent of its officers are stationed officially in the Prince
of Wales skyscraper in central Hong Kong and unofficially maintain
informers in Hong Kong’s police, governing authority, airport
administration, and other levers of power. It checks the computerized
visitors entering Hong Kong and has the capability to ferret
names that match those in the immense database its global cyber
espionage has amassed. When it detects the entry of any person of
possible intelligence interest, it can use its sophisticated array of
cyber tools to attempt to remotely steal data from that individual.
Such remote surveillance was so effective in 2013 that the U.S. State
Department had instructed all its personnel in Hong Kong to avoid
using their iPhones, Androids, BlackBerry phones, and other smart
phones when traveling to Hong Kong or China. Instead, it supplied
them with specially altered phones that disable location tracking
and have a remotely activated switch to completely cut off power
to its circuitry. No one in the intelligence community doubts the
prudence of taking such precautions in China, and it is nearly inconceivable
that Snowden, whose prior position at the NSA included
teaching military personnel about Chinese capacities, could himself
be unaware of Chinese intelligence service capabilities to acquire
travelers’ data in Hong Kong.
Once Hong Kong had served as a window into China for Western
intelligence, but in the first decade of this century the Chinese
intelligence service had achieved such a pervasive presence in Hong
Kong, and such ubiquitous electronic coverage of diplomats and
other foreigners even suspected of involvement in foreign intelligence
work, that the CIA and British intelligence found it almost
as difficult to operate in Hong Kong as in mainland China. Even
though the CIA kept officers there in 2013, it was considered “hostile
territory,” according to the former CIA officer Tyler Drumheller.
Snowden apparently knew the limits of CIA operations in Hong
Kong, which provided him with an envelope of protection. He told
Greenwald that he was counting on the Chinese presence in Hong
Kong to deter the CIA from intruding on their meetings.
When he flew to Hong Kong in May 2013, he took with him
NSA secrets, which he knew would be of great interest to China.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 239
9/30/16 8:13 AM
240 | how america lost its secrets
In fact, he advertised that he had such secrets in his interview with
the South China Morning Post. Whatever he might have assumed
about the inability of the CIA to stop him in Hong Kong, he could
not assume that Chinese intelligence services would relegate themselves
to a purely passive role when secret NSA documents were in
a hotel room in Hong Kong. Snowden might have esteemed himself
to be an independent actor playing Prometheus on a global stage
provided by YouTube, but the Chinese might have viewed him very
differently indeed.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 240
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 23
A Single Point of Failure
A single point of failure (SPOF) is a part of a system that, if it
fails, will stop the entire system from working.
—Wikipedia
Snowden described anyone who was the sole repository of
secrets that could undo the NSA’s intelligence gathering as “the
single point of failure.” While still shielding his own identity in May
2013, he wrote to Gellman that U.S. intelligence “will most certainly
kill you if they think you are the single point of failure that could
stop this disclosure and make them the sole owner of this information.”
Such a person of course would be of even greater interest to
adversary intelligence services if they were aware of the payload of
secrets that person was carrying because they could use it to unravel
the NSA’s sources and methods.
Snowden saw himself as that “single point of failure.” We know
that while still in Hong Kong he said he had obtained access to computers
that the NSA had penetrated throughout the world and in
Moscow he added that he had had “access to every [NSA] target,
every [NSA] active operation,” against the Chinese. “Full lists of
them,” which, if he chose to share them, could make China “go
dark.” To be sure, he did not refer to Russian intelligence activity in
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 241
9/30/16 8:13 AM
242 | how america lost its secrets
any interview that he ever gave in Moscow under Russian protection,
but he had similar access to NSA operations against Russia in
his job at the NSA’s Threat Operations Center.
The enormous power of the NSA rested in its ability to keep its
sources and methods secret from its foes. A queen on the chessboard
could be captured by a lowly pawn if it was well- placed. In
this case, the person who had it in his power to expose the NSA’s
critical sources and methods would no doubt be considered fair game
by America’s adversaries, including the Chinese and Russian cyber
services. Indeed, how could they resist such a prize?
Snowden might have believed that he was in control, but the CIA
believed that confidence was misinformed. “Snowden thinks he is
smart,” Morell said, after reviewing the case on a panel appointed
by President Obama, “but he was never in a position in his previous
jobs to fully understand the immense capabilities of our Russian and
Chinese counterparts.” He could adopt a cocky tone in his postmortem
conversations with journalists in Moscow, but in truth he had
no means to block the efforts of the Chinese or Russian services in
Hong Kong. Even before Snowden contacted its diplomats in Hong
Kong, the Russian intelligence service would swing into action to
determine his intelligence value.
How many days he planned to be in Hong Kong depended on how
speedily he could arrange a meeting with journalists. “The purpose of
my [Hong Kong] mission was to get the information to journalists,”
he told the editor of The Guardian after he was safely ensconced in
Moscow. He indicates that he was working under a tight clock. The
time pressure resulted in his e- mailing an ultimatum to Gellman on
May 24: either Gellman would publish the selected documents in
The Washington Post within seventy- two hours, or he would lose
the exclusive scoop. Snowden wanted the story to break on May 27,
without his true identity (which Gellman did not know) attached to
it. His identity would be known to a foreign mission in Hong Kong if
Gellman acceded to his demands, because, as previously mentioned,
Gellman’s story would enclose an encoded signal he planned to use
as proof of his bona fides. So even before the Guardian reporters had
agreed to come to Hong Kong, Snowden had plans to deal with a
foreign mission. If the Post had accepted his terms, Snowden would
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 242
9/30/16 8:13 AM
A Single Point of Failure | 243
have been in a very different position. The story would have broken
before Poitras or Greenwald even knew about Snowden’s presence
in Hong Kong, and his identity would be secret except for whatever
foreign mission he had contacted. But, as we know, the Post turned
down his ultimatum.
Time was running out if he was to break the story and leave Hong
Kong before the NSA realized he was missing. At best, he was safe
until June 3, when he was supposed to return from his medical leave.
If he failed to show up in Hawaii on June 3, alarm bells at the NSA
would go off, and it would not take long to find him. Airline records
would show that he had flown to Hong Kong. Snowden told Poitras
that NSA security would ask, “This guy isn’t where he says
he’s supposed to be. He’s supposed to be getting medical treatment.
Why the hell is he in Hong Kong?” It would not take long to determine
that he had lied about his medical treatment, and then the hunt
would begin.
He had, remember, already sent Poitras an enciphered file and told
her she would get the key once she followed his instructions. Greenwald
had still not committed himself to meeting Snowden. Greenwald
was, however, willing to publish the documents once Snowden
provided them. That Snowden remained in Hong Kong suggests that
his reason for going to and remaining in Hong Kong went beyond
just delivering documents to journalists, which he could have done
over the Internet. What he could not do in America, without risking
arrest, was to make and release a video.
In any event, after his attempt to pressure the Post, Snowden
asked Greenwald to fly immediately to Hong Kong. Presumably, he
still wanted Greenwald’s story and the video done in Hong Kong
before he became a suspect. If Greenwald and Poitras had immediately
flown to Hong Kong, it still might have left Snowden an escape
window.
But of course things do not always go as planned. Greenwald,
although agreeing to come to Hong Kong, waited in New York
for two days while the Guardian editors completed their due diligence.
Poitras waited with him. As a result of this delay, as we know,
Green wald and Poitras did not arrive at his hotel in Hong Kong until
June 3, only hours before Snowden became suspect at the NSA. “It
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 243
9/30/16 8:13 AM
244 | how america lost its secrets
was a nervous period,” Snowden recalled. Although he bravely told
The Guardian “there was no risk” that the information he carried
had been compromised by other parties in Hong Kong, that claim
was, at best, wishful thinking on his part.
By this time, he had registered at the hotel under his true name
and provided his credit card; he was in contact with three highprofile
journalists, two well- known hacktivists, and, as he suggested
to Gellman, a foreign diplomatic mission.
The mission’s interest would likely be piqued when the newspaper
published its first story on June 6. Greenwald then went on
TV in Hong Kong, revealing to every interested intelligence service
that a defector from the NSA was in Hong Kong providing secret
documents.
Poitras released the famous video showing Snowden and secret
NSA documents three days later. At this point, Snowden shone
brightly as a beacon to NSA secrets to every player in the intelligence
game, even if they did not know the extent of the damage he
could inflict on American intelligence.
Snowden fogged over his travel plans to the media by telling
reporters that he intended to remain in Hong Kong and fight extradition,
but certainly the Russian officials whom he contacted became
aware that he had other plans, having relayed his request to go to
Russia to their superiors in Moscow. And, unlike the media, any
sophisticated intelligence service was well aware of his movements.
In Hong Kong, cell phones emit their GPS location every three seconds;
even if Snowden disabled his own phone, lawyers and helpers
could be tracked with ease.
China’s president, Xi Jinping, who was meeting President Obama
for the first time in Rancho Mirage, California, on June 8, would
have been keenly interested in the unfolding Snowden affair. Obama
had publicly called Xi to task for Chinese cyber espionage, and now
that charge was undermined by Snowden’s accusation that the
United States was engaged in massive cyber espionage. U.S. intelligence
verified that China instituted a full- court press of Snowden
in Hong Kong immediately after the release of the video. From
that moment on, any communication or movement Snowden made
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 244
9/30/16 8:13 AM
A Single Point of Failure | 245
during his next fifteen days in Hong Kong would not likely escape
China’s scrutiny.
The United States had the ability to also follow Snowden’s movements
via the cell phones of his lawyers and other confederates
after he surfaced. All tracking could be done by the NSA. What the
United States lacked was any practical means to capture a highprofile
intelligence defector in a city that was part of China. By this
time, U.S. intelligence had established that Chinese and Hong Kong
security services were monitoring Snowden’s every move. This left
few options in the game for the United States. “I’m not going to
be scrambling jets to get a twenty- nine- year- old hacker,” President
Obama said on June 27.
The real prize, in any case, was not Snowden but the NSA’s secret
documents that he had with him. When Snowden was observed
entering the Russian consulate, the game was all but over. U.S. diplomats
could protest over back channels to Moscow, as they did, but
with a trove of NSA secrets at stake there was little expectation that
would stop the Russians. Two days later, the “single point of failure,”
as Snowden described himself, was on his way to Russia, where his
hosts would be calling the shots.
When a victory is obtained in a major sports event, it is cause for
public celebrations. The opposite is true in espionage. An intelligence
victory involving secret documents, even if it cannot be entirely
hidden, is kept veiled, as far as is possible, to increase the value of
the coup. “The final move in any sophisticated intelligence game,”
Angleton told me in relation to espionage intelligence, is “obscuring
a success.”
Following Angleton’s precept, the Russian or Chinese intelligence
services, if they had a role in acquiring the product of the selfdescribed
“single point of failure,” would work to cover their tracks in
the affair even before the Aeroflot plane carrying Snowden touched
down at Sheremetyevo International Airport on June 23. If any false
flag operations had been used to trick, mislead, or otherwise induce
Snowden to come to Hong Kong, they would be disbanded. If any
safe house had been used to quarter Snowden in his first eleven days
in Hong Kong, it would be shut down. If any operatives had been
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 245
9/30/16 8:13 AM
246 | how america lost its secrets
used in Hawaii to guide or assist Snowden, they would be put back
into sleeper mode. If any telltale traces had been left in chat rooms
or social media, they would be systematically deleted. Even more
important to the ultimate success of such a communications intelligence
coup, measures would be taken to conceal the extent of the
damage done by the “single point of failure” by not precipitously
closing down compromised sources. Snowden might believe that
the power of the information he held was so great that if disclosed
by him, all the NSA’s sources would immediately go dark in Russia
and China, but Russia might not wish to provide such clarity to its
adversaries. An intelligence service need not close down channels
it discovers are compromised by an adversary. Instead, it can elect
to continue to use them and furnish through them bits of sensitive
or misleading information to advance its own national interest. The
real danger here was not that the NSA’s “lights” would dramatically
be extinguished but that all the future messages illuminated by
those lights would be less reliable sources of intelligence. The game
of nations is, after all, merely a competition among adversaries to
gain advantages by the surreptitious exchange of both twisted and
straight information.
To review: When the NSA asserted in the summer of 2013 that
over one million documents had been compromised, it was recognizing
the most massive failure in its sixty- year history. Not only
were NSA secrets taken, but secret files from the CIA, the British
GCHQ, and America’s cyber military commands had been compromised.
It was, as Sir David Omand, the former head of the British
GCHQ, described it, a “huge strategic setback” for the West. The
genie could not be put back into the bottle. There is not a reset button
in this game. The best that the NSA could do now was damage
control while its adversaries took full advantage of the setback. Several
hundred U.S. and British intelligence officers worked around the
clock in Washington, D.C., Fort Meade, Maryland, and Cheltenham,
England, for months on end to determine which parts of the most
powerful communications intelligence system in the world could be
salvaged from what had been the Snowden breach.
Adding insult to injury, Snowden, speaking from his new perch
in Moscow, told applauding audiences that the entire purpose of
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 246
9/30/16 8:13 AM
A Single Point of Failure | 247
the U.S. exercise, including deliberately “trapping” him in Moscow,
was to “demonize” him. “There was no question that I was going
to be subject to a demonization campaign.” Snowden said in Moscow,
“They [Greenwald and Poitras] actually recorded me on camera
saying this before I revealed my identity.” Snowden asserted this
“demonization” was to divert attention from the government’s own
crimes. By providing Snowden with this platform to rail against the
putative machinations of the United States, Putin laid claim to the
moral high ground.
Snowden’s motive in requesting documents from other foreign
intelligence services, such as the GCHQ, and copying lists of NSA
sources remains unexplained. It is difficult to believe that his motive
was whistle- blowing, because these documents were not among
those he gave to journalists in Hong Kong. Indeed, he did not provide
the journalists with the lists of sources that were particularly
relevant to the NSA’s surveillance of Russia. His legal representative
in Moscow, Kucherena, confirmed that Snowden had taken
secret “material” to Russia and had access to NSA documents that
he had not given to journalists. Those unrevealed documents would
be prized by many an adversary service. Did he use those documents
as leverage in his transformation? The role that Moscow might have
played in Snowden’s defection clearly requires a closer examination
of the machinations that brought Snowden to Russia. That is why I
visited Moscow in October 2015.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 247
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 248
9/30/16 8:13 AM
part four
MOSCOW CALLING
Deception is a state of mind— and the mind of the state.
— james jesus angleton
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 249
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 250
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 24
Off to Moscow
They talk about Russia like it’s the worst place on earth. Russia’s
great.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2015
Before flying to Moscow, I arranged to have dinner with
Oliver Stone at an Italian restaurant on the Upper East Side of
New York. I had greatly respected Stone’s ability as a film director
after watching him work on Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, a film
in which I had a cameo role. I had also debated Stone about the historical
accuracy of his 1991 movie JFK at Town Hall in New York.
When we dined, he had just written, produced, and directed
Snowden, an independently financed film depicting Snowden, as
Stone put it, as “one of the great heroes of the twenty- first century.”
In preparing for it, Stone had seen Snowden in 2013 and 2014 and
had had a six- hour meeting with Putin.
I wanted to talk to Stone not to learn about the film but to learn
how he had gained access to Snowden in Moscow. I knew from the
documents taken from Sony Pictures Entertainment— allegedly by
North Korea— that Stone had paid The Guardian $700,000 for the
film rights to The Snowden Files, a book written by Luke Harding.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 251
9/30/16 8:13 AM
252 | how america lost its secrets
These documents also revealed that Stone had paid Anatoly Kucherena,
Snowden’s legal representative in Moscow, $1 million, supposedly
for the rights to his novel, Time of the Octopus. Even by
Hollywood standards, $1 million was an extraordinary sum to pay
for a yet- to- be- published work of Russian fiction, and it was especially
striking because Stone was making a fact- based movie using
the actual names of the characters, and he had already bought the
rights to The Snowden Files.
“Is your script based on Kucherena’s Time of the Octopus?” I
asked.
“No,” Stone replied. “I haven’t used it.”
He said that the payment was for what he termed “total access.”
He explained that Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, the producers
of the James Bond franchise, had optioned Greenwald’s book
No Place to Hide to make into a movie about Snowden for Sony.
Stone said that the million- dollar deal with Kucherena effectively
guaranteed that any competing project would not have access to
Snowden. Sony consequently put the competing film on hold.
Lawyers often negotiate deals on behalf of a client, but blocking a
competing film requires considerably more influence with the powers
that be in Russia. Kucherena, though, was no ordinary lawyer.
Among other influential positions, I noted earlier, he was on the public
board of the Russian federal security bureau, which had assumed
the domestic operations of the defunct KGB in April 1995. In light
of such connections, Stone said Kucherena might be acting as an
intermediary for other parties who controlled access to Snowden in
Russia. In any case, his concern was making a movie, and Kucherena
delivered the exclusive access to Snowden.
Aside from being a skilled director, Stone is a shrewd producer
who knows how to close a deal. He assessed, correctly as it turned
out, that his project coupled with the payment to Kucherena would
effectively block Sony’s competing project. Where the money went
was far less clear.
Toward the end of our dinner, Stone told me that he did not know
I was writing a book about Snowden until a few weeks earlier. He
learned of my book from Snowden himself. He said Snowden had
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 252
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Off to Moscow | 253
expressed concern to him about the direction of the book I was writing.
“What is it about?” Stone asked me.
I was taken aback. I had no idea that Snowden was aware of my
book. (I had not tried to contact him.) I told Stone that I considered
Snowden an extraordinary man who had changed history and was
intentionally vague in my description of my book’s contents. Stone
seemed to be reassured, so I asked him about the possibility of my
seeing Snowden in Moscow. He said that I “might want to speak
to Anatoly [Kucherena].” Kucherena, it seemed to me, was clearly
Snowden’s gatekeeper.
In Snowden’s two years in Moscow, he, or his handlers, had granted
only a handful of face- to- face press interviews. Most of these were
with the journalists who had published his story, but one was with
James Bamford for his 2014 Wired piece. According to Bamford, it
took nearly nine months to arrange the meeting. “I have been trying
to set up an interview with him [Snowden]— traveling to Berlin,
Rio de Janeiro twice, and New York multiple times to talk with
the handful of his confidants who can arrange a meeting,” Bamford
recounted in Wired. After my dinner with Stone, I hoped to find a
quicker route.
I was advised by a Moscow- based journalist that I needed a
“fixer,” the curious term that journalists commonly use to describe a
local intermediary who arranges appointments in foreign countries.
I retained Zamir Gotta, a highly respected TV producer in Moscow,
who I was told had helped “fix” the Bamford interview with
Snowden.
“There is only one door to Snowden,” Zamir wrote to me. “His
name is Kucherena.” Zamir said Kucherena rarely saw journalists,
but he had a contact in his office. He further told me Kucherena
required any journalist seeking an interview with Snowden to
submit his questions to the lawyer two weeks in advance and, if
approved, to sign a document stating he would not deviate from the
questions. Next, my questions had to be translated from English to
Russian (even though Snowden does not speak Russian) and then
vetted by Kucherena’s staff. Zamir also suggested I stay at the Hotel
National in Red Square because Snowden had gone there for pre-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 253
9/30/16 8:13 AM
254 | how america lost its secrets
vious meetings with Bamford. So I sent Kucherena, via Zamir, ten
questions that I wanted to ask Snowden.
I next obtained a multi- entry Russian visa from the Russian consulate
in New York and booked myself a room in the Hotel National.
My night flight from New York to Moscow took just less than
eight hours and landed at Terminal D of Sheremetyevo International
Airport at 7:40 a.m. on October 29, 2015. I did not immediately
proceed through passport control, in part because I wanted to
explore the transit zone in which Snowden was supposedly trapped
for six weeks.
Sheremetyevo Two, where all international flights land, was built
in the waning days of the Cold War for international passengers
arriving for the Moscow 1980 Summer Olympics. It was modernized
in 2010, including opening a walkway that connects Terminals
D, E, and F for transit passengers.
Snowden had vanished, at least from public view, in this complex
of terminals for nearly six weeks in the summer of 2013. His
explanation to journalists, as will be recalled, was two part. First, he
said he had planned to board the next fight to Cuba and from there
proceed to Ecuador. He said that he was unable to board this flight
because his passport had been invalidated by the U.S. government
while he was flying to Russia. Second, after discovering his passport
had been revoked, he stayed in a capsule hotel in the transit zone for
the next thirty- nine days. To better understand the plausibility of
his version of those events, I proceeded through the transit passage
to Terminal F, where Snowden’s plane from Hong Kong had landed
at 5:15 p.m. Moscow time on June 23, 2013.
Snowden did not go through passport control upon arrival.
Before any of the other passengers were allowed to disembark from
the plane, Russian plainclothes officers from the special services
boarded the plane and asked both Snowden and Sarah Harrison, his
WikiLeaks- supplied “ninja,” to accompany them to a waiting car
that whisked them away. According to the account in Izvestia, “A
special operation was conducted for his reception and evacuation.” It
further said, “Snowden’s flight to Moscow was coordinated with the
Russian authorities and intelligence services.”
If not for the “special operation,” he could have easily gone by foot
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 254
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Off to Moscow | 255
to Terminal E. It is a nine- minute walk through the transit passageway.
Snowden, though, had one good reason for not going to Ecuador,
even if Russia had permitted it. He believed that he would be
vulnerable to rendition by the U.S. government in Ecuador. “If they
[the U.S. government] really wanted to capture me, they would’ve
allowed me to travel to Latin America, because the CIA can operate
with impunity down there,” he explained in the previously cited
interview with Katrina vanden Heuvel, the editor of The Nation, in
2014. He had already discussed the likelihood of his being captured
in Ecuador with Assange before his departure for Moscow. He later
told Alan Rusbridger, the editor of The Guardian, that he considered
himself at risk in Latin America. So why would Snowden, who told
Greenwald that his “first priority” was his own “physical safety,”
leave the comparative safety of Russia to put himself in jeopardy in
Ecuador?
He had not obtained a visa to Ecuador at its consulate in Hong
Kong, as Kucherena confirmed. The Ecuador destination was, as we
have seen, a cover story put out by Assange and his associates, and it
worked with the press.
Over a hundred reporters and photographers scrambled aboard
Aeroflot Flight SU150 to Cuba the next morning in response to this
anonymous tip on a website, but Snowden was not aboard that flight
and was not seen in Terminal E. By the time the plane landed in
Cuba, Aeroflot denied that anyone named Snowden had ever been
booked on any of its flights to Cuba, a denial it continued to repeat to
every reporter who queried the airline for the next six weeks.
The first news that Snowden was still in Russia came on July 1,
2013. A statement posted on the WikiLeaks website— and signed
“Edward Snowden”— after thanking “friends new and old” for his
“continued liberty,” accused President Obama of pressuring “leaders
of nations from which I have requested protection to deny my asylum
petitions.” It added, “This kind of deception from a world leader
is not justice, and neither is the extralegal penalty of exile. These are
the old, bad tools of political aggression.” In fact, Snowden had not
suffered a “penalty of exile,” because his passport was still valid for
returning to the United States, but that was not an option for him as
the statement made clear.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 255
9/30/16 8:13 AM
256 | how america lost its secrets
Because the Aeroflot flight to Cuba was the only means of getting
directly from Moscow to Latin America, Russian reporters,
encouraged by WikiLeaks posts, continued taking the daily elevenhour
flight to Cuba until August 1. The charade only ended when
Kucherena said in a press conference at the airport that Snowden
would be taking up residency at an undisclosed location in Moscow
and walked out of the airport with Snowden.
Sarah Harrison, Snowden’s companion on the plane to Moscow,
told Vogue that she and Snowden for thirty- nine days had shared
a windowless room in the transit zone of the airport where they
watched TV, washed their clothes in a sink basin, and ate meals from
the nearby Burger King. The only hotel with windowless rooms
in the transit zone in 2013 was the Vozdushny V- Express Capsule
Hotel, located next to a newly opened Burger King.
The polite V- Express desk clerk, who spoke English, showed me
the standard windowless double room. It was approximately twentyfour
square feet in area. Most of the floor space was taken up by twin
beds. Across from the bed, behind a plastic curtain, was a stall with
a shower, a toilet, and a sink. It would be very cramped quarters for
two people to share for such an extended period. It cost 850 rubles an
hour (about $18 in 2013). For thirty- nine days, that hourly charge
would have added up to $16,600. Snowden claimed to the BBC that
he brought a large cache of cash to Russia, which he could have used
to pay the hotel. But such a long stay was not allowed, according to
the desk clerk. The maximum stay allowed by the hotel was twentyfour
hours. So either the rule was waived for Snowden, or Harrison
did not tell the full truth.
I learned from a former KGB officer that there are VIP quarters
beyond the confines of the airport, including suites at the fourhundred-
room Novotel hotel, which is located about seven miles
away, that are used for debriefing and other purposes by the security
services. According to him, the security services are not restricted
from entering and leaving the transit zone.
The possibility that Snowden was staying elsewhere would help
explain the futile search for him by a large number of reporters
over those thirty- nine days. When they learned from tweets that
Snowden was not aboard the plane to Havana on June 24, for weeks
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 256
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Off to Moscow | 257
they aggressively questioned all the restaurant employees, security
guards, and airport personnel they could find. They also bought
business- class tickets on flights just to gain access to VIP lounges in
the transit zones. Despite this intensive search, none of them found
a single person who had seen Snowden, although his image was constantly
shown on airport TV screens. Egor Piskunov, a reporter for
RT television, even rented a room in the V- Express Capsule Hotel
and “tipped” hotel employees, trying, without success, to get information.
Piskunov told me, “It was a total vanishing act.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 257
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 25
Through the Looking Glass
There’s definitely a deep state. Trust me, I’ve been there.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
While waiting to hear back from Kucherena’s office, I
arranged to meet with Victor Cherkashin, who had been one
of the most successful KGB spy handlers in the Cold War. Cherkashin,
born in 1932, had served in the KGB’s espionage branch
from 1952 until 1991 and now operated a private security firm in
Moscow. I was particularly interested in his recruitment of three
top American intelligence officers: Aldrich Ames of the CIA, Robert
Hanssen of the FBI, and Ronald Pelton of the NSA. I hoped that seeing
these intelligence coups through the eyes, and mind- set, of their
KGB handler might provide some historical context for the Snowden
defection. So I invited Cherkashin to lunch at Gusto, a quiet Italian
restaurant, located near the Chekhov Theater in Moscow.
Cherkashin, a tall thin man with silver hair, showed up promptly
at 1:00 p.m., wearing an elegant gray suit and dark tie. He walked
with a spry step. Because he had served in counterintelligence in the
Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C., for nearly a decade, he spoke
flawless English.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 258
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Through the Looking Glass | 259
I began by asking him about one of the more celebrated cases he
had handled for the KGB, that of Ames, who had acted as a Russian
mole in the CIA between April 1985 and January 1994. In those nine
years, he rose, or was maneuvered by the KGB, into a top position
in the CIA’s highly sensitive Counterintelligence Center Analysis
Group, which allowed him to deliver hundreds of top secrets to the
KGB. In return, according to Cherkashin, Ames received between
$20,000 and $50,000 in cash for each delivery, which amounted to
$4.6 million over the nine years.
I asked Cherkashin about the weakness the KGB looked for in an
American intelligence worker that might lead him to copy and steal
top secret documents. How did he spot a potential Ames? Was it a
financial problem? Was it a sexual vulnerability? Was it an ideological
leaning?
“Nothing so dramatic,” he answered. When assessing Ames’s
biographical data, Cherkashin said he was looking for a well- placed
intelligence officer who was both dissatisfied with and antagonistic
to the service for which he worked.
“The classic disgruntled employee,” I interjected.
“Any intelligence officer who strongly feels that his superiors are
not listening to him, and that they are doing stupid things, is a candidate,”
he continued. He said he had found that the flaw in a prospect
that could be most dependably exploited was not his greed, lust,
or deviant behavior but his resentment over the way he was being
treated.
“Is that how you spotted Ames?”
“Actually, he approached us, not vice versa.” It was his job in the
CIA to approach opposition KGB officers. “But, yes, we saw the
potential,” he said.
Because Ames had been paid $50,000 in cash by Cherkashin for
his first delivery, I asked whether he fit into the category of a disgruntled
employee.
“Wasn’t he just a mercenary?” I asked.
“I knew from our intelligence reports that he needed money
for debts stemming from his divorce,” he answered. “But he was
also angry at the stupidity and paranoia of those running the CIA.
Ames told me at our first secret meeting that they were misleading
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 259
9/30/16 8:13 AM
260 | how america lost its secrets
Congress by exaggerating the Soviet threat.” Cherkashin evaluated
Ames as a man who felt not only slighted by his superiors but “helpless
to do anything about it” within the bureaucracy of the CIA.
“The money we gave, even if he could spend only a small portion
of it, gave him a sense of worth.” He explained that the KGB had
an entire team of psychologists in Moscow that worked on further
exploiting Ames’s resentment against his superiors.
The search for an adversary intelligence officer who resents his
service was not limited to KGB recruiters. It was also the “classic
attitude” that the CIA sought to exploit in its adversaries, according
to a former deputy director. “You find someone working for the
other side and tell him that he is not receiving the proper recognition,
pay, and honors due him,” Morell said, pointing out that the
same “psychological dynamic” could be used to motivate someone
to “act alone” in gathering espionage material.
I next turned to an even more important KGB coup with Cherkashin:
the Robert Hanssen case. From the KGB’s perspective, Hanssen
was an extraordinary espionage source. He was a walk- in who
never entered the Soviet embassy or met with KGB case officers, but
in working as a KGB mole between 1979 and 2001, he had delivered
even more documents to the Russian intelligence services than
Ames. Cherkashin learned of this potential spy when he received an
anonymous letter from him identifying an FBI source in the Soviet
embassy. When that tip proved to be accurate, Cherkashin got the
resources he needed from the KGB to develop this source. From the
start of his work for the KGB, Hanssen laid down his own rules.
The KGB would deliver cash from which all the fingerprints were
removed to locations, or “dead drops,” he specified. He would deliver
documents exposing FBI, CIA, and NSA sources and methods in
another dead drop. The KGB would precisely follow his instructions.
Cherkashin told me that Hanssen’s “astounding self- recruitment”
was executed in such a way that the KGB never actually controlled
him. “He was our most important mole and we didn’t ever know his
identity, where he worked, or how he had access to FBI, CIA, and
NSA files.” Even so, the KGB (and later the SVR) paid him $600,000
in cash. In return, the anonymous spy delivered twenty- seven com-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 260
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Through the Looking Glass | 261
puter disks containing hundreds of secret documents revealing the
sources and methods of American intelligence. According to Cherkashin,
it was the largest haul of top secret documents ever obtained
by the KGB (although it was only a small fraction of the number of
top secret NSA, Department of Defense, and CIA documents taken
by Snowden in 2013). Cherkashin told me the price paid by Moscow
was a great bargain because it helped compromise “the NSA’s most
advanced electronic interception technology,” including a tunnel
under the Soviet embassy.
Yet it was only after newspapers reported that Hanssen had been
arrested by the FBI in February 2001 that Cherkashin learned the
name and position of the spy he had recruited. Cherkashin told me
that what mattered to the KGB was not “control” of an agent but the
value of the secrets he or she delivered. “Control is not necessary in
espionage as long as we manage to obtain the documents.” So in the
eyes of the KGB, anyone who elected to provide it with U.S. secrets
was a spy.
“All we knew was that he delivered valuable documents to us and
asked for cash in return,” he said. “We didn’t control him; he controlled
us.”
An uncontrolled mole who provided secrets to the KGB and the
SVR for twenty- two years was very different from fictional moles
in the spy movies. I asked whether it would have been better if the
KGB had him under its control.
“Possibly,” Cherkashin answered. “But as it turned out, Hanssen
was by far our most valuable penetration in the Cold War.”
“Could Hanssen really be called a mole?” I asked.
“A ‘mole’ is a term used in spy fiction,” he said. “We prefer the
more general term ‘espionage source.’ ”
“So anyone who delivers state secrets to the KGB, for whatever
reason, is an espionage source?” I asked.
“Certainly, if the information is valuable to us,” Cherkashin
answered.
“If some unknown person simply delivered a trove of top secret
communications secrets to the doorstep of Russia, would it be
accepted?” I asked with Snowden in mind.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 261
9/30/16 8:13 AM
262 | how america lost its secrets
“I can’t say what the SVR would do today. I am long retired,” he
said, with a nostalgic shake of his head. “But in my day, we needed
some reason to believe the gift was genuine.”
“Would you need to vet the person delivering it?”
“With Hanssen we did not have that opportunity,” he said. “If
we believed the documents were genuine, we would of course grab
them.”
The final recruitment I asked Cherkashin about was that of Ronald
Pelton, the civilian employee of the NSA who had retired in 1979.
Pelton had left the NSA without taking any classified documents
with him. After retiring, he had financial difficulties, and he sought
to get money from the KGB. On January 14, 1980, he walked into
the Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C., and asked to see an intelligence
officer. After he was ushered into a secure debriefing room, he
said that he had information that Russia would find interesting, but
he wanted money in return. What interested me about the Pelton
case was that Cherkashin proceeded to recruit Pelton, even though
he was no longer working at the NSA and no longer had access to
the NSA. In addition, because the FBI had twenty- four- hour surveillance
on the embassy, Pelton had almost certainly been photographed
entering it and had also possibly been recorded asking for
an intelligence officer by electronic bugs that the KGB suspected the
NSA had planted there. What did the KGB do in a situation in which
a former civilian employee at the NSA possessed no documents?
Despite the risks involved, Cherkashin decided Pelton had to be
debriefed by communications intelligence specialists. So he had him
disguised as a utility worker and smuggled out in a van to the residential
compound of the ambassador in Georgetown. A few days
later, he was dropped off at a shopping mall.
“Why did you go to such effort if Pelton had neither documents
nor access to the NSA?” I asked.
“It was the information in his head that we wanted.” Cherkashin
said that because the KGB rarely got access to any NSA officer, it
was worth the risk. So Pelton was given $5,000 in cash and a plane
ticket to Vienna, where he was domiciled at the residence of the
Soviet ambassador to Austria. A KGB electronic communications
expert, Anatoly Slavnov, was then sent to Vienna to supervise the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 262
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Through the Looking Glass | 263
Pelton debriefings. The debriefing sessions, which went on for fifteen
days, were from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. In them, Pelton managed to
recall Project A, a joint NSA- CIA- navy operation in which submarines
surreptitiously tapped into Soviet undersea cables in the Sea
of Okhotsk, which connected to the Soviet Pacific Fleet’s mainland
headquarters at Vladivostok. Pelton received another $30,000 from
the KGB.
“Did the information in his head prove valuable?” I asked.
“As long as the NSA didn’t know the tap was compromised by
Pelton, we could use the cable to send the NSA the information we
wanted it to intercept.” He said that while actual NSA documents
would have proved more useful than someone’s memories, “Our job
is to take advantage of whatever we can get.”
Two years later, Pelton was again flown to Vienna for another
debriefing to see if he could recall any further details. According to
Cherkashin, the KGB’s job was to leave no stone unturned when
it came to the NSA’s sources. In 1985, the KGB’s task ended when
Pelton was arrested by the FBI. Like Ames and Hanssen, Pelton was
sentenced to life imprisonment.
Looking at his watch, Cherkashin politely excused himself.
I subsequently spoke to Colonel Oleg Nechiporenko, who had
been a foreign intelligence officer in the KGB between 1958 and
1985 and continued his intelligence work until recently as chief
counterterrorism expert of the Russian- led Collective Security
Treaty Organization. Over a leisurely coffee in the bar of the Hotel
National, he told me that many “walk- ins” who contacted Soviet
officials in his time were emotionally disturbed, but all of them had
to be assessed for possible intelligence value. “Our job was to find
espionage sources,” he said with a twinkle in his eye. “The Internet
has changed the espionage business since secret documents can be
massively downloaded by an unhappy employee,” he said, “but they
still need to be assessed by a professional.”
Through the eyes of the KGB, a penetration of American intelligence
was clearly opportunistic. If these practices continued, they
put Snowden’s situation in a new light for me. If Russian intelligence
considered it worthwhile to send a former civilian worker at
the NSA, such as Ronald Pelton, two thousand miles from Washing-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 263
9/30/16 8:13 AM
264 | how america lost its secrets
ton, D.C., to Austria so that its specialists could debrief him on the
secrets he held in his head, it would have an even greater interest in
exfiltrating Snowden from Hong Kong to get, aside from his documents,
whatever secrets he held in his head. If Russian intelligence
were willing to opportunistically accept the delivery of U.S. secrets
from an unknown espionage source that it neither recruited nor
controlled, such as Hanssen, it would obviously have little hesitancy
in acquiring the secrets that Snowden had stolen of his own volition,
even if Snowden had acted for idealistic reasons.
If Russian intelligence focused its search pattern on disgruntled
American intelligence workers, such as Ames, it is plausible that it
spotted Snowden through his Internet rants against U.S. surveillance.
Even if it had missed Snowden in Hawaii, a disgruntled former
civilian employee at the NSA would have received its full attention
after he contacted Russian officials in Hong Kong. While the tactics
of the SVR might have changed since Cherkashin retired, its objectives
remained the same. And the NSA remained its principal target.
Nor is there any reason to doubt that it still measures success in its
ability to obtain, by whatever means, the secret sources and methods
of its adversaries. Snowden was in a position, with both the documents
he had taken and the knowledge he had in his head, to deliver
the KGB such a coup.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 264
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 26
The Handler
As for [Snowden’s] communication with the outside world, yes, I
am his main contact.
— anatoly kucherena, Moscow, 2013
On november 1, I still had not been able to make contact with
Anatoly Kucherena, and my flight back to New York was in five
days. My fixer, Zamir, had been trying to arrange an appointment
for three weeks, but he had only received one callback from Kucherena’s
assistant, Valentina Kvirvova. She wanted to know how I knew
Oliver Stone. Zamir told her of my part in Stone’s movie. That was
the last he had heard from her. Meanwhile, a Moscow- based journalist
told me that she had waited eighteen months to hear back from
Kucherena before giving up. I also learned from a Russian researcher
that Kucherena had not given a single interview since his television
interview with Sophie Shevardnadze on September 23, 2013. And
no Russian journalist, or any Moscow- based foreign journalist, had
ever obtained an interview with Snowden. At this point, Zamir was
becoming increasingly doubtful about my getting access to either
Kucherena or Snowden.
I turned to another contact in Moscow. When I had been investigating
the 2006 polonium poisoning of the former KGB officer
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 265
9/30/16 8:13 AM
266 | how america lost its secrets
Alexander Litvinenko, I had interviewed Andrei Lugovoy. A former
KGB officer assigned to protecting the Kremlin’s top members in the
1990s, Lugovoy later opened his own security company. In 2005, he
became a business associate of Litvinenko’s in gathering information
and made regular trips to London to meet with him. Because
he had tea with Litvinenko at the Pine Bar of the Millennium Hotel
in London on November 1, 2006, the day Litvinenko was poisoned,
he became the main suspect in the British investigation. He could
not be extradited, however. After reconstructing the chronology of
the crime, I established that Litvinenko had been contaminated with
polonium at a Japanese restaurant some four hours before his tea
with Lugovoy. I therefore wrote that the crime scene might not have
been at the Pine Bar, a finding that he said he greatly appreciated.
Lugovoy was elected to the Duma in 2007 and also hosted a
twenty- four- part television series on espionage for which Putin personally
decorated him. He was also now reputed to be in the inner
circle of power in Moscow. So I called him.
We arranged to meet in the bar of the Hotel National. A short
but well- built man with a bullet- style haircut, Lugovoy showed
up promptly at 1:00 p.m. After discussing some of the subsequent
developments in the still- lingering polonium investigation, I asked
him if he knew Kucherena.
“I don’t know him, but I know someone who does,” he answered.
“Why are you interested in seeing Kucherena?”
I told him that I wanted to speak to him about Snowden but I had
been unable to arrange a meeting.
“That’s no problem,” he said, raising his cell phone (which never
left his hand). He hit a number on the speed dial and spoke rapidly
in Russian (which I do not understand). He cupped his hand over the
phone and asked how long I would be in Moscow. After I told him
that I was leaving that Friday, he spoke again in Russian to the person
on the other end. “You will have an appointment on Thursday,”
he said.
Later that afternoon, Valentina, Kucherena’s assistant, called to
say that Kucherena would be happy to see me at his office at 6:00 p.m.
on Thursday. I didn’t ask Lugovoy whom he had called. Whomever
Lugovoy called obviously had the power to arrange the meeting.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 266
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Handler | 267
When I arrived at Kucherena’s office, I was with my translator
Zamir. (Kucherena did not speak English.) I arrived ten minutes
early, and a receptionist showed me into a well- lit square room
with an elegant table in the center. There was a sumptuous basket
of exotic fruits on the table and large portraits of racehorses on the
walls. Another door opened, and a tall, graceful woman came into the
room and introduced herself as Valentina. She was wearing a wellfitting
black dress, a striking jade necklace, and high heels. When
she asked whether we would like anything to drink, it seemed more
like the prelude to an elegant dinner party than an interview about
Snowden.
Valentina spoke very good English. She apologized for the delay
in responding to my requests, explaining that she received “thousands
of requests” for interviews and did not have time to answer
them. When I asked how many were answered, she shrugged and
said, “Not many.”
At that moment, Kucherena entered with a jaunty step, a cherubic
face, and untamed white hair. He was wearing gray slacks, a partially
buttoned cashmere polo sweater, and a fully engaging smile.
As I had learned from his entry in Wikipedia, he was born in a
small village in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Moldavia in 1960
and had obtained his law degree from the All- Union Correspondence
Law Institute in 1991. He opened his own law firm in Moscow
in 1995. Kucherena’s well- known friendship with Putin had
evidently not hurt his law practice. His clients had included such
well- connected defendants as Viktor Yanukovych, the president of
Ukraine overthrown in 2014; Grigory Leps, a Russian singer blacklisted
by the United States for allegedly acting as a money courier
for a Eurasian criminal organization; Valentine Kovalev, a former
Russian minister of justice charged with corruption; and Suleyman
Kerimov, a civil servant from Dagestan who had amassed an estimated
fortune of $7.1 billion. Kerimov had recently been charged
for manipulating the price of potash in Belarus. Most of these clients
were reputed to be part of Putin’s inner circle.
To break the ice, I asked Kucherena about Oliver Stone. I knew
he had a small role in Stone’s forthcoming movie, in which he plays
Snowden’s lawyer in Moscow.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 267
9/30/16 8:13 AM
268 | how america lost its secrets
“I was impressed by how few takes he needed to shoot my scene,”
he answered.
“How did you come to be Snowden’s lawyer?” I asked.
“Snowden picked me from a roster of fifteen lawyers with which
he had been provided.”
Because Snowden did not speak or read Russian, I asked Kucherena
about how Snowden had come to pick him from the roster. Could
he have known about his connections?
“I suppose it was because of my record in defending human
rights,” Kucherena replied with a broad smile.
Kucherena went to Sheremetyevo International Airport to meet
his new client on the morning of Friday, July 12, 2013. At that point,
he said that Snowden had been held virtually incommunicado for
twenty days. Other than Russian officials, the only person he had
been allowed to see during this period was Assange’s aide, Sarah
Harrison.
“Where in the airport did you meet him?” I asked. “Was it in a
VIP lounge?”
“It was in the transit zone,” he replied coyly. “That is all I can say.”
They spoke through a translator. By this time, Harrison had sent
twenty- one countries petitions for asylum that were signed by
Snowden. Whatever their purpose, Kucherena did not consider them
helpful.
“I told him that if he wanted to get sanctuary in Russia, he would
have to immediately withdraw all the petitions in which he had
asked other countries for asylum.” Kucherena said that otherwise he
could not represent him. Snowden agreed to that condition.
Shortly before 5:00 p.m., Kucherena accompanied Snowden, who
was wearing an open- neck blue shirt and a badly creased jacket, to
area G9 in the transit zone, where they emerged from a door marked
“Authorized Personnel Only.” A number of officials in dark suits,
who Kucherena assumed were from the “special services” to protect
Snowden, were already in the room. Snowden and Harrison seated
themselves at a table. A Russian translator was also seated at the
table. At this point, thirteen invitees were ushered into the room
to witness Snowden’s first public appearance in Russia. It was rare
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 268
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Handler | 269
if not unprecedented for an American intelligence worker to seek
asylum in Russia.
These invitees included some of Putin’s close associates, progovernment
activists, and representatives of both Amnesty International
and Human Rights Watch. “It was totally bizarre,” said
Tanya Lokshina, the deputy director of Human Rights Watch, who
attended. “Although it was billed as a press conference,” she recalled,
“there was no press or photographers allowed in the room.” Nor was
anyone allowed to photograph or record the event.
Snowden read from a prepared statement accusing the U.S. government
of violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
saying he was a victim of political persecution, and concluding, “I
will be submitting my request to Russia today [for asylum], and
hope it will be accepted favorably.” After answering a few questions
posed by the audience, he left the room with Kucherena and Harrison
by the same door they had entered.
In discussing this meeting, Kucherena told me that Snowden had
not intended to seek asylum in Russia when he arrived on June 23.
Because he also said he had not met Snowden prior to the day of the
conference, I asked how he knew Snowden’s intentions.
“When I accepted the case, I received Snowden’s dossier,” he
answered. “I was able to see all his interviews.”
Presumably, Snowden’s dossier included his interviews with the
FSB, the SVR, and other Russian security services. If so, it would
explain how Kucherena could be so certain that Snowden had
brought “material” with him to Russia that he had not provided to
journalists in Hong Kong. Before meeting with Kucherena, I had
met with Sophie Shevardnadze, who told me that Kucherena had
personally approved the translation of their interview into English.
So I asked Kucherena about the interview. It will be recalled that in
response to a question about whether Snowden had secret material
with him in Russia, Kucherena had said “certainly.” Was this
exchange accurate?
“It was accurate,” he answered.
Snowden, as we know, had said in Hong Kong that he had only
given journalists some of the state secrets he had stolen and that he
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 269
9/30/16 8:13 AM
270 | how america lost its secrets
deemed others too sensitive for journalists. So I wanted to find out
from Kucherena which documents Snowden had taken to Russia. I
went about it in a roundabout way. When Shevardnadze asked him
about the secret material Snowden might reveal in Russia, Kucherena
pointedly called her attention to Snowden’s CIA service, suggesting
that he might possess CIA files. I also knew that in Kucherena’s
roman à clef, he had Joshua Frost, the thinly veiled Snowden- based
character, steal a vast number of CIA documents that could do great
damage to U.S. intelligence. By retaining them, Frost made himself
a prime target of the CIA.
So I asked, “Is Joshua Frost fact or fiction?”
“I can’t tell you that,” he said. “If I said he was Snowden, it would
violate the attorney- client privilege.”
“I understand,” I said. “But did Snowden do what Frost did in
your book?”
“That is for you to decide,” he answered with a sly smile. “It’s my
first novel.”
When I asked if he could arrange for me to see Snowden, he
said that first I would have to submit my questions to Ben Wizner,
Snowden’s American lawyer at the ACLU. He made it clear to me
that the exposure of Snowden to journalists, or at least the vetting of
journalists, had been outsourced to Wizner. Kucherena was handling
Snowden’s liaisons with the Russian authorities while Wizner was
handling the Snowden narrative, including selecting the media outlets.
Presumably, Wizner had handpicked Snowden’s past interviewers
in Moscow, including Barton Gellmna, James Bamford, Brian
Williams, John Oliver, Alan Rusbridger, and Katrina vanden Heuvel.
“After that, the final decision is up to Snowden,” he said. That
seemed to conclude the interview, but as I got up to leave, he added,
“His legal defense is fairly expensive.”
Snowden had said in a BBC interview in 2015, as previously mentioned,
that he had brought enough cash to Hong Kong and Russia
to cover all of his expenses. So I asked Kucherena if Snowden had
brought his own funds.
“He was penniless when he arrived,” he replied. I found that
answer plausible because the FBI reportedly had not found a large
cash withdrawal from his account before his departure and it seemed
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 270
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Handler | 271
to me too risky for him to carry a large sum of undeclared cash
through three airports. Because large sums of cash must be declared,
the detection of the money could compromise his plan to deliver his
NSA documents. Snowden might have told the BBC he had brought
cash to allay suspicions about who was financing his stay in Moscow.
I was intrigued by this remark. Snowden, as far as I knew, didn’t
need a legal defense, because he was not charged with a crime in
Russia and the United States had no extradition treaty with Russia.
While Kucherena unfortunately did not arrange an interview with
Snowden, he did something I considered more important. He confirmed
the accuracy of his September 2013 assertion that Snowden
had brought secret material to Russia, material he had not given to
journalists in Hong Kong. After what I had learned from Cherkashin
about the lengths that Russian intelligence would go to obtain U.S.
communications intelligence secrets, I viewed Snowden’s access to
this material to be a crucially important part of the mystery.
That day, I immediately sent my questions to Ben Wizner, and I
offered to fly back to Moscow if Snowden would grant me an interview.
In March 2016, Wizner answered that Snowden had “respectfully
declined.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 271
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 272
9/30/16 8:13 AM
part five
CONCLUSIONS:
WALKING THE CAT BACK
In solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able
to reason backward.
— sherlock holmes, A Study in Scarlet
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 273
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 274
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 27
Snowden’s Choices
It is the choices we make that show who we truly are.
— j. k. rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone
Russian authorities had the opportunity to thoroughly
debrief Snowden as to his motive for stealing state secrets,
whereas U.S. authorities did not. It cannot be assumed that he had
a single consistent motive in 2013. Snowden has shown, if nothing
else, that he was adaptable to changing circumstances. He might have
begun taking documents for one reason and found other reasons as
he proceeded in his quest. Many of the reported circumstances of his
activities, including his probes, contacts, theft, and escape, are disputed
by his supporters. Many of his other activities are shrouded
by the secrecy of the NSA. We do know, though, that Snowden made
four extraordinary choices during the nine- month period in 2013. If,
as is said, actions speak louder than words, Snowden’s four choices
illuminate the underlying concerns guiding his acts. In the case of a
classified intelligence breach, as in the post- action analysis of a masterful
chess game, the sequence of moves a player makes provides an
important clue to his strategy. Let us review what we have already
learned about these decisions.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 275
9/30/16 8:13 AM
276 | how america lost its secrets
The First Decision
The initial move that Snowden made in preparation for the Level 3
breach was switching jobs on March 15. Snowden chose to leave his
job as a system administrator at Dell to take one at Booz Allen as an
analyst in training. His motive could not have been money, because
it was a lower- paying position. At the time he made this choice, he
had already set up an encrypted channel with Laura Poitras for the
purpose of sending her secret material. But he did not have to change
jobs to send her important secrets. So what was his purpose in making
this fateful choice?
The job change was not necessary to expose NSA domestic activities.
If he had only wanted to be a whistle- blower, there were ample
documents about the NSA’s activities already available to him on
the NSANet. He also had access at Dell to the administrative file
that contained the FISA court orders issued every three months to
Verizon. In addition, as the NSA’s damage assessment established,
before switching jobs, Snowden had already taken most of the documents
pertaining to the NSA’s domestic operations that he could
have supplied to Poitras and Greenwald for whistle- blowing purposes.
Indeed, while still at Dell, he had told Poitras he had a copy
of Presidential Policy Directive 20, a document in which President
Obama authorized the NSA to tap into fiber cables crossing the
United States. Snowden described it to her as “a kind of martial law
for cyber operations, created by the White House.” True, he took a
more recently issued FISA order and PRISM presentation in April
after switching jobs, but he could just as easily have taken the January
2013 version of the FISA order from the administrative file of
Dell. It would have had the same explosive effect in the media.
Nor did he switch jobs to lessen the risk of getting caught. Actually,
the change put him in far greater jeopardy. At Dell, he was relatively
safe from apprehension because he could take documents,
such as the Presidential Policy Directive 20, from access points at
the NSA shared by many of his peers, making it difficult to trace the
theft. Indeed, if he just wanted to expose the NSA’s domestic operations,
he could have done the entire operation at Dell. He could even
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 276
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Snowden’s Choices | 277
have sent Poitras documents anonymously over his own Tor software
and server. And he could have remained in his self- described
“paradise” in Hawaii with his girlfriend.
When he chose to move to Booz Allen, the risk of exposure
greatly increased because of its auditing system. Any documents he
took without authorization could be traced back to him (though not
in real time). As he later told Greenwald and Poitras, he knew that
stealing documents at the Booz Allen job meant that he would either
go to prison or escape from America. He didn’t want to face prison
time, so the job change required an escape plan. As part of that plan,
soon after he started work at the Booz Allen– managed facility, he
submitted a request for a medical leave of absence.
We can safely assume that the reason he made this risky switch
in employment was that he wanted something beyond the whistleblowing
documents. He wanted documents that were not available
at the Dell job. One such document he took was the top secret
Congressional Budget Justification book for fiscal year 2013. This
“black budget,” as it is called in Congress, contained the entire intelligence
community’s priorities for, among other things, monitoring
the activities of potential adversaries and terrorist organizations.
It specified the money requested not only by the NSA but by the
CIA, the DIA, the National Reconnaissance Office, and other intelligence
services. Snowden could not have objected to the budget’s
being somehow secret or illegitimate, because it was duly approved
by both houses of Congress and the president. If it was not for purposes
of whistle- blowing, presumably he had another purpose for
taking such a document. It certainly held value to other actors. “For
our enemies, having it [the black budget] is like having the playbook
of the opposing NFL team,” said the former CIA deputy director
Morell in 2015. “I guarantee you that the SVR, the Russian foreign
intelligence service, would have paid millions of dollars for such a
document.” If unlike Ames, Hanssen, and Pelton, Snowden was not
after acquiring money, he must have seen another value in taking it.
The documents he stole at Booz Allen certainly increased his
value to adversary nations, because they included lists revealing the
NSA’s sources in Russia, China, and other foreign countries.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 277
9/30/16 8:13 AM
278 | how america lost its secrets
Snowden wanted more than just NSA secrets. He used his new
position and widened access at Booz Allen to go after secret documents
from the intelligence services of Britain, Australia, New
Zealand, and Israel. He revealed this operation only after receiving
sanctuary in Russia. He told an interviewer that by moving to his
new Booz Allen job as an infrastructure analyst, he gained the ability
to pry secrets out of the allies of the NSA. “I had a special level
of clearance, called ‘Priv Ac,’ ” he said. This “priv ac” status did not
allow him to bypass the password protection at sealed- off compartments
at the NSA, but it did allow him to request files from foreign
services cooperating with U.S. intelligence.
By way of example, he described one file from the British GCHQ
cipher service that he copied, stole, and provided to other parties. It
exposed a legally authorized British operation to collect electronic
data on terrorist matters in Pakistan by tapping into Cisco routers
used by telecom companies in Asia. This GCHQ operation, as
Snowden knew, violated neither British nor American law. He told a
BBC interviewer in regard to that file, “What’s scariest is not what
the government is doing that’s unlawful, but what they’re doing
that is completely lawful.” So his criteria for taking such documents
were not their illegality. In his five weeks at this Booz Allen job, he
also used this same newly acquired “priv ac” at the NSA to steal files
from the Israeli, Canadian, and Australian intelligence services.
Jumping from one outside contracting firm to another for the
purpose of penetrating other Western intelligence services is not
the conventional mission of a whistle- blower. In the parlance of CIA
counterintelligence, the actions of an employee of an intelligence
service who changes his jobs solely to steal the more valuable secrets
of this service is called an “expanding penetration.” It is not possible
to believe that Snowden did not know the immense damage that
the highly sensitive documents he was taking from the NSA and its
allies could cause.
His choice to switch jobs did not come out of the blue. It was not
based on serendipitously discovering the documents after he began
working at Booz Allen. As he told Lana Lam, he knew in advance
that by switching to the job at Booz Allen, he would gain the opportunity
to take the lists of NSA sources. He knew that the NSA’s
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 278
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Snowden’s Choices | 279
secretive National Threat Operations Center’s chief business was, as
its name suggests, countering direct threats from China, Russia, and
other adversary states and that to deal with these threats, the NSA
had used sophisticated methods to hack into the computers of adversaries.
The NSA was even able to remotely gain entry to adversary
computers that were not hooked into a network. “It’s no secret that
we hack China very aggressively,” Snowden later said from Moscow.
He had a planned target: getting the lists of the enemy computers
that the NSA had hacked into.
He also knew he was undertaking a dangerous enterprise. He even
mentioned the possibility that he would be “in an orange jumpsuit,
super- max prison in isolation or Guantánamo,” perhaps even
assassinated.
He knowingly chose this course presumably because he believed
the value of the secrets he would obtain by switching jobs outweighed
the risk of imprisonment. Or worse. Part of his calculus
might have been the belief that the NSA lists, GCHQ documents,
and other material in his possession could give him great leverage, if
he chose to exert it, in his future dealings with intelligence services
(including the NSA). His choice to widen his access was made, if not
to get rich, to empower himself.
The Second Decision
The second choice of consequence that Snowden made was to make
Hong Kong his first stop. He had many other options. He could have
remained in America, as almost all previous whistle- blowers had
chosen to do. If he did that, he would have to make his case in court
(and, in that case, the Level 3 documents he took might have been
retrieved before they fell into unauthorized hands). He could have
also chosen to make an escape to a country that did not have an active
extradition treaty with the United States. He could have, for example,
taken a direct flight to Brazil, which has no extradition treaty
with the United States. Brazil also had the advantage of being the
home country of Glenn Greenwald, whose cooperation he sought.
Snowden could have gone to many other countries without extradi-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 279
9/30/16 8:13 AM
280 | how america lost its secrets
tion treaties with the United States. Yet, instead, he flew to Hong
Kong, which had an extradition agreement that had been enforced
throughout the past decade with Hong Kong courts ordering the
arrest of almost every fugitive charged by U.S. authorities. He could
expect that when the United States filed a criminal complaint, Hong
Kong authorities would seize him and the alleged stolen property of
the U.S. government in his possession. Even if he were released on
bail and successfully defeated extradition in a Hong Kong court, the
Hong Kong authorities would almost certainly retain all the NSA
and GCHQ files he had gone to such lengths to steal.
His reason, as he told Greenwald, was that China could provide
him with physical protection from any countermeasures by U.S.
intelligence agencies such as “American agents . . . breaking down
the door” of the hotel room and seizing him. China also had sway
over Hong Kong’s security activities.
Hong Kong was therefore merely a protected stopover en route to
his next destination. If he had gone directly to Moscow and provided
the same journalists with the same documents at a press conference
in Moscow, his status as a whistle- blower might have been viewed
with less sympathy in the media. Even The Guardian, for example,
might have been reluctant to publish a Moscow- based story revealing
British and American communications intelligence secrets.
The Third Decision
The third choice Snowden made, and the choice that most effectively
defined him to the public, was to reveal himself as the man behind
the leak in a video in Hong Kong. He not only identified himself as
the person who stole the government documents published by The
Guardian and The Washington Post but also incriminated himself
further on camera by allowing Poitras to film him actually disclosing
the NSA’s secret operations to Greenwald. By disclosing classified
data to Greenwald, an unauthorized person, he intentionally burned
his bridges.
What makes this choice intriguing is that there was no evident
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 280
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Snowden’s Choices | 281
need for him to expose himself in this way. If he merely wanted to
be a whistle- blower, he could have, as Bradley Manning did, anonymously
sent the documents to journalists as “Citizen Four.” In fact,
in late May 2013, that was exactly what he did. He anonymously
sent Gellman the PRISM scoop, which the Post published on June 6.
He also sent Greenwald and Poitras documents while he was still
the anonymous Citizen Four. Neither Gellman nor Greenwald had
suggested the need for a face- to- face meeting with Snowden. Even
after he had revealed his true identity to Poitras and Greenwald on
June 3, the Guardian editor Ewen MacAskill offered him the option
of remaining an unnamed source for the stories. He said, as he later
told Vanity Fair, “You should remain anonymous; the stories are
just as good without you.” However, anonymity was not part of
Snowden’s long game.
The reason he gave Greenwald in Hong Kong for going public in
this way was to avoid having any suspicion fall on his co- workers at
the NSA. Yet in the initial stories published by Greenwald, Poitras,
and Gellman, Snowden had not allowed the reporters to identify him
by either name or position. If he did not act to deflect suspicion from
his co- workers for the initial investigation, why do it a week later?
In the intervening week, the FBI had already launched its criminal
investigation. In any case, he did not need to be the subject of a documentary
film to take sole responsibility for stealing state secrets. He
could have simply allowed Greenwald to identify him by name as
the source in the stories.
One thing that Snowden could not accomplish by anonymously
transferring the documents to journalists was a starring role in the
drama. If he had appeared digitally masked in Poitras’s video with
an altered voice, he would not achieve fame. To do that, he needed to
allow Poitras to film him committing the crime of turning over NSA
documents to Greenwald. This video was also part of his advance
planning. Indeed, one reason he chose Poitras was that she was a
prizewinning documentary filmmaker. Snowden, while he was still
working at the NSA in March 2013, made it clear how he intended
to use Poitras’s filmmaking skills. He told her, “My personal desire is
that you paint the target directly on my back.” Making himself the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 281
9/30/16 8:13 AM
282 | how america lost its secrets
on- camera star of a twenty- hour- long reality show, edited first into
a video and then a full- length documentary, transformed him in the
public’s mind into a hero.
It would be a mistake to assume that the central role he gave
himself was simply an exercise in narcissism. After the video was
released, he was no longer a near nonentity servicing a computer
system at a backwater NSA base in Hawaii. He had emerged from
the shadowy world of electronic intelligence to become one of the
most famous whistle- blowers in modern history. It was a mantle
that would allow him to also become a leading advocate of privacy
and encryption rights, as well as the leading opponent of NSA spying.
While this remarkable transformation might not have been his
entire motive, it was certainly the result of the choice he made to go
public.
The Fourth Decision
The final choice he made was to board a nonstop flight to Moscow
on June 23. Once the U.S. criminal complaint was unsealed on June
21, he needed to leave Hong Kong; his continued presence would
have been a complication for the Chinese president, Xi, scheduled
soon to meet President Obama. His only route out of Hong Kong
went through two adversaries of the United States: China and Russia.
China, as far as is known, did not offer him sanctuary. According
to one U.S. diplomat cited by The New York Times, China might have
already obtained copies of Snowden’s NSA files and did not want the
problem of having Snowden defect to Beijing. In any case, if it had
not already acquired the files, it could assume it would receive that
intelligence data from its Russian ally in the intelligence war. Whatever
its reason, China did not use its considerable power in Hong
Kong to block Snowden’s exit.
Nor did Snowden obtain a visa to any country in Latin America or
elsewhere during his monthlong stay in Hong Kong. As in the oftcited
Sherlock Holmes clue of the dog that did not bark, Snowden’s
lack of any visas in his passport strongly suggests that he had not
made plans to go anyplace but where he actually went: Moscow. His
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 282
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Snowden’s Choices | 283
actions here, including his contacts with Russian officials in Hong
Kong, speak louder than his words.
Just as he believed the Chinese intelligence service could protect
him in Hong Kong from a physical attack by agents of the United
States, he could assume that the FSB could protect him from them
in Moscow. He was not entirely naive about its capabilities. During
his service in the CIA, he had taken a monthlong training course at
the CIA’s “farm” at Fort Peary, in which counterintelligence officers
taught about the capabilities of the Russian security services. He
couldn’t have believed that Russia would allow a defector from the
NSA who claimed to have had access to the NSA’s sources in Russia
and China to leave Moscow before its security services obtained that
information.
It is not uncommon for a defector to change sides in order to find
a better life for himself in another country. Some defectors flee to
escape a repressive government or to find one in which they believe
they are more closely attuned to its values. Russia, however, is ordinarily
not the country of choice for someone such as Snowden seeking
greater civil liberties and personal freedom. So why did Snowden
choose Russia for his new life?
The four choices just discussed that Snowden made, taken together,
show that Snowden was determined to succeed where others
before him had failed. He not only wanted to take full credit for
stealing files from the NSA but also wanted to escape any American
retribution for his act. His decision suggests to me a highly intelligent,
carefully calculating man who was hell- bent on finding a new
life for himself in a foreign country. A common thread that runs
through these four choices is a willingness to do whatever was necessary
to achieve this new life, including disregarding his oath to
protect secrets and instead transporting them on thumb drives to
a foreign country. To protect himself, he was also willing to rely on
the influence of adversary intelligence services in Hong Kong and
put himself in the hands of Russian authorities in Moscow. He was
also willing to use some of his classified documents as a medium of
exchange, if not bait, with journalists to get the public attention he
sought.
These choices paid off for Snowden, the new hero of millions. In
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 283
9/30/16 8:13 AM
284 | how america lost its secrets
Moscow, he could enjoy a safe life, free from the threats of a CIA
rendition team dropping from the sky or extradition proceedings. He
was now under the protection of Putin’s Russia. The press had a field
day with the domestic surveillance documents that he gave them. As
far as Snowden was concerned, as he told Gellman on December 21,
2013, in Moscow, “The mission’s already accomplished.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 284
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 28
The Espionage Source
The government’s investigation failed. [It] didn’t know what was
taken.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2014
In moscow, I had learned that Russian intelligence services use
the broad, umbrella term “espionage source” to describe moles,
volunteers, and anyone else who delivers another state’s secrets
to it. It applies not only to documents but to the secret knowledge
that such a source is able to recall and includes both controlled and
uncontrolled bearers of secrets. It is also a job description that fit
Edward Snowden in June 2013.
Unless one is willing to believe that the Putin regime acted out of
purely altruistic motives in exfiltrating this American intelligence
worker to Moscow, the only plausible explanation for its actions
in Hong Kong was that it recognized Snowden’s potential as an
espionage source. Snowden’s open disillusionment with the NSA
presented the very situation that the Russian intelligence services
specialized in exploiting. He had also revealed to reporters in Hong
Kong that he had deliberately gained access to the NSA’s sources
and methods and that he had taken highly classified documents to
Hong Kong. He further disclosed that before leaving the NSA, he
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 285
9/30/16 8:13 AM
286 | how america lost its secrets
had gained access to the lists of computers that the NSA had penetrated
in foreign countries. He even went so far as to describe to
these journalists the secrets that he had taken as a “single point of
failure” for the NSA. And aside from the documents he had copied,
he claimed that the secret knowledge in his head, if he disclosed it,
would wreak havoc on U.S. intelligence. “If I were providing information
that I know, that’s in my head, to some foreign government,
the US intelligence community would . . . see sources go dark that
were previously productive,” he told the editor of The Guardian in
Moscow.
In short, he advertised possessing priceless data that the Russian
intelligence services had been seeking, with little success, for
the past six decades. These electronic files could provide it with the
keys to unlock the NSA’s entire kingdom of electronic spying. Could
any world- class intelligence service ignore such a prize? To miss the
opportunity to get its hands on such a potential espionage source
would be nothing short of gross negligence.
In fact, this golden opportunity was not missed in Hong Kong.
Even if the Russian intelligence service had not previously had
him in its sights— which, as discussed earlier, appears to me to be
extremely unlikely— he made contact with Russian officials in Hong
Kong, and Putin personally approved allowing Snowden to come to
Russia.
This decision made it possible for Snowden, without an entry
visa to Russia, or, for that matter, any other country, to check in
and board an Aeroflot flight to Moscow. We also know that a special
operation was mounted to take Snowden off the plane once it landed
in Moscow. Such an operation could not have been executed without
advance planning. Nor would he be removed from the plane without
a plan for his stay in Russia. Once Putin approved it, there is little
reason to doubt that the plans to get Snowden to Moscow, and whatever
cover stories were deemed necessary to obscure them, had been
carried out professionally by Russia’s special services.
When an intelligence service makes such elaborate preparations
for extracting a foreign intelligence worker, it presumably also
expects to debrief him or her on arrival. Pelton, for example, who
had access to far less valuable information than had Snowden, was
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 286
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Espionage Source | 287
held incommunicado in Vienna for two weeks during his debriefing.
It would be inconceivable for an intelligence service to bring
a potential espionage source such as Snowden to Russia and allow
him to catch the next plane to Latin America. The false report provided
to the press that Snowden was flying there was likely nothing
more than a smoke screen to confuse foreign observers while he was
receiving his initial debriefing and evaluation.
When it comes to the esoteric enterprise of reconstructing the
work of U.S. communications intelligence, military as well as civilian
experts in cryptology, computer sciences, and communications are
necessary. Unlike in the case of Pelton, Snowden, according to Anatoly
Kucherena, had secret material in his possession. Even if Russian
intelligence had already acquired copies of the electronic files
prior to Snowden’s arrival in Moscow, Snowden’s interpretation of
them would be part of the debriefing because intelligence data needs
to be put in context.
“This debriefing could not be done overnight,” according to a former
high- ranking officer in the GRU, the Russian military intelligence
service. “There is no way that Snowden would not be fully
debriefed,” he said. He also said GRU specialists in signals intelligence
would be called in.
Putin’s approval of the Snowden operation was not without consequences.
Not only did Obama make good on his threat to cancel
the pre- Olympics summit with Putin, but also, as it turned out,
the Snowden exfiltration proved a turning point in the “reset” of
U.S.- Russian relations. Having to accept the onus of declining relations
with the Obama administration, Putin, it seems safe to assume,
attempted to get the bonus of the NSA’s communications intelligence
from Snowden. The GRU, the SVR, and other Russian intelligence
services would not stop questioning Snowden, even if it took
years, until they had squeezed out of him whatever state secrets he
had. Because Snowden was rewarded with sanctuary, a residence, and
bodyguards, there is no reason to doubt that he refused to accommodate
his hosts. While he might continue to see himself as a whistleblower
on a supranational scale, as far as Russian intelligence was
concerned, he was an espionage source.
For an intelligence service, the game is not over when it obtains
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 287
9/30/16 8:13 AM
288 | how america lost its secrets
state secrets. It still needs to fog over the extent of its coup, as said
earlier, to prolong the value of the espionage. Hence it is likely that
the story that Snowden had thoroughly destroyed all the stolen
data in the month prior to departing for Russia, as well as the story
that he had turned down all requests to be questioned by the FSB
and other Russian intelligence officials, was part of the legend constructed
for him. The repetitions of these uncorroborated claims in
his press interviews might also have enhanced his public image for
the ACLU effort to get clemency for him. Even so, in view of the
importance of such communications intelligence to Russia, it would
be the height of naïveté for U.S. or British intelligence to accept such
claims as anything more than camouflage.
As for Snowden’s motive, I see no reason to doubt his explanation
that he stole NSA documents to expose its surveillance because
he believed that it was an illicit intrusion into the privacy of individuals.
Such disaffection is not a unique situation in the intelligence
business. Many of Russia’s worldwide espionage sources before
Snowden were also dissatisfied employees who had access to classified
secrets. Like some of them, Snowden used his privileged access
to reveal what he considered the improper activities of the organization
for which he worked. In that sense, I fully accept that he began
as a whistle- blower, not as a spy. It was also as a whistle- blower that
he contacted Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald, and Barton Gellman,
who published the scoops he provided in Der Spiegel, The Guardian,
and The Washington Post.
Snowden’s penetration went beyond whistle- blowing, however.
In the vast number of files he copied were documents that contained
the NSA’s most sensitive sources and methods that had little if anything
to do with domestic surveillance or whistle- blowing.
Snowden could not have acted entirely alone. It will be recalled
that the deepest part of his penetration was during the five weeks
he worked at the National Threat Operations Center in Hawaii as
a contract employee of Booz Allen Hamilton. It was there that he
copied Level 3 files, including the so- called road map to the gaps
in American intelligence. During this period, Snowden had neither
the passwords nor the system administrator’s privileges that would
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 288
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The Espionage Source | 289
allow him to copy, transfer, and steal the electronic files. He therefore
must have obtained that assistance from someone who had the
passwords and privileges. Other workers there might have shared
his sensibilities and antipathy toward NSA surveillance. It therefore
seems entirely plausible that he found a co- worker willing to
cooperate or, vice versa, a co- worker found him. Snowden might
not have been aware of his new accomplice’s true motives or affiliations,
but without some co- worker’s providing him with entry to
the sealed- off computers, he could not have carried out the penetration.
To our knowledge, whoever helped him evidently did not want
to expose himself to prosecution or defect from the NSA. That was
Snowden’s role. By accepting the sole blame in the video that Poitras
made about him in Hong Kong, Snowden shielded anyone else from
suspicion, which was, as he told Poitras, his purpose. Whoever helped
him may still be working at the NSA.
To be sure, there remains that other glaring gap in the chain of
events that led Snowden to Moscow: his whereabouts and activities
during his first eleven days in Hong Kong. Mike Rogers, the
chairman of the House Select Committee on Intelligence, even suggested,
without any evidence, that Snowden might have been taken
to mainland China during this period. What drove his speculation
was the admission of U.S. intelligence that despite its vast global
resources for searching credit card charges, banking transactions,
hotel registrations, e- mails, police records, and even CCTV cameras,
neither it nor its allies were able to find a trace of Snowden during
that time. It was, in a phrase made famous by the former secretary
of defense Donald Rumsfeld, “a known unknown.” Just as likely he
could have been staying in a well- prepared safe house anywhere in
Hong Kong or even at the home of an unknown associate. All that is
really known is that soon after he emerged from this venue, moved
to the Mira hotel, and gave his celebrated interview to journalists, he
was safely settled in Russia.
Snowden’s actions appear squarely at odds with his assertions of
serving his country’s interests. Even accepting that he began with a
sincere desire to be a world- class whistle- blower, his mission evolved,
deliberately or not, into one that led him to disclose key communica-
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 289
9/30/16 8:13 AM
290 | how america lost its secrets
tions intelligence secrets to a foreign power with an agenda that is
hardly aligned with his country’s interests. A defector is defined in
the Cambridge English Dictionary as “a person who leaves his or her
own country or group to join an opposing one.” Snowden’s actions
fit that description. In the end, it is Snowden’s actions, not his words,
that matter.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 290
9/30/16 8:13 AM
c h a p t e r 29
The “War on Terror” After Snowden
Because of a number of unauthorized disclosures and a lot of
hand- wringing over the government’s role in the effort to try to
uncover these terrorists, there have been some policy and legal
and other actions that make our ability collectively, internationally,
to find these terrorists much more challenging.
— cia director john brennan,
in response to the Paris terrorist attack, November 2015
On the evening of November 13, 2015, nine jihadist terrorists
acting on behalf of ISIS brought normal life in Paris to a
screeching halt. Three suicide bombers blew themselves up at the
stadium at Saint- Denis while President Hollande was inside attending
a match between France and Germany. Other terrorists that
night killed 130 people at cafés, restaurants, and a theater. Three
hundred and eighty- eight others were wounded in the carnage.
Abdelhamid Abaaoud, a twenty- eight- year- old Belgian citizen of
Moroccan origins who served ISIS as a logistics officer in Syria in
2014, planned the attack over many months with the help of others
in Syria. To organize it, they smuggled three suicide bombers into
Europe through Greece, raised financing, set up a base in the Molenbeek
section of Brussels, imported deactivated assault weapons from
Slovenia that were restored by a technician, bought ammunition,
acquired suicide vests, obtained “burner” cell phones, rented cars,
and, two months before the attack, rented three additional apartments
under fake identities to conceal the operation. Finally, in
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 291
9/30/16 8:13 AM
292 | how america lost its secrets
November, they made online bookings for quarters in Paris for the
nine attackers. Even though Abaaoud was well- known to Western
intelligence services, none of the communications surrounding the
preparations for the attack came to the attention of the NSA or its
allied services in Europe. A critical find for the investigators enabled
them to unravel the chain that eventually led them to the perpetrators,
but it had nothing to do with electronic surveillance. A cell
phone belonging to one of them was found by the security forces,
following a broad search they conducted, which included trash cans
situated in the vicinity of the concert halls. So this breakthrough in
the investigation had nothing to do with systematic data analysis
conducted prior to the attack.
Indeed, in the sequence of the Paris events, as in other terror
events, the challenge is not just bringing culprits to justice. It is preventing
the terrorists from carrying out their attack to begin with.
Police cannot constantly protect “soft targets” such as restaurants,
cafés, theaters, and street gatherings. The only practical means by
which a government can prevent such attacks is to learn in advance
their planning and preparations. One means of acquiring this information
is by listening in on the channels through which members
of loosely knit terrorist organizations, such as ISIS, communicate.
This form of intelligence gathering obviously works best so long
as the terrorists remain unaware that the communication channels
they are using are being monitored. Once they find out that their
messages and conversations are being intercepted, they will likely
find a safer means to communicate important information. For that
reason, communications intelligence organizations keep the sources
and methods they employ for monitoring these channels in a tightly
sealed envelope of secrecy.
Yet, in June 2013, the NSA found that envelope had been breached
by Snowden, who knowingly compromised three programs that it
used to keep track of terrorist organizations around the world. The
first system he divulged, and the one that received the most public
attention, was what the NSA called the “215” program because it
had been authorized by Section 215 of the Patriot Act of 2001. This
program compiled the billing records of every phone call made in
America. The data included the number called and the duration of
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 292
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The “War on Terror” After Snowden | 293
the call but not the name of the caller. This anonymous data was
archived into a huge database. The idea was that when any foreigner
on the FBI’s watch list of terrorists called any number in the United
States, the FBI could trace that person’s entire chain of telephone
contacts to try to determine if he or she was connected to a known
terrorist cell. There was, however, a major flaw in this program: it
did not cover e- mail and other Internet messaging, which by 2013
had largely replaced telephone calls. In addition, terrorist organizations,
after the tracking down of Osama bin Laden in 2011, had
become fully aware of the vulnerability of telephoning overseas. So
although the NSA could cite a handful of early successes that “215”
yielded, Snowden’s exposure of it did only limited damage.
Snowden did vastly more damage by revealing the PRISM program,
also called “702” because it was authorized in 2008 by Section
702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Its effectiveness
proceeded from the misplaced confidence that terrorist organizations
in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Pakistan had in the encryption and
other safeguards used by giant Internet companies, such as Apple,
Google, Twitter, and WhatsApp. They evidently had not known
that in 2007 the NSA found a way to intercept this data before it
was encrypted. The Internet, despite metaphors such as “the cloud”
and “cyberspace,” initially travels through fiber cables, almost all of
which run through the United States and its Five Eyes allies. So by
2013 the NSA was able to access 91 percent of the Internet before
it was encrypted. This so- called upstream data included Google
searches, tweets on Twitter, social media postings, Skype conversations,
messages on Xbox Live, instant messages sent over WhatsApp,
and e- mails sent via the Internet. The NSA could also read concealed
messages in photographs and online game moves. According to a
declassified 2015 inspector general’s analysis, the actual interceptions
in this program in 2013 were mainly limited to the communications
of preselected foreign terrorists.
Until the Snowden breach was revealed on June 6, 2013, this program
gave U.S. intelligence a valuable tool for gathering unexpected
intelligence. Snowden must have been aware of how highly the NSA
valued this program because, according to the documents he released,
PRISM was “the number one source of raw intelligence used for
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 293
9/30/16 8:13 AM
294 | how america lost its secrets
NSA analytic reports.” From the continued use of these intercepted
channels by suspected terrorists on the NSA’s watch lists, it could
be reasonably assumed that these users were unaware of the NSA’s
capacity to intercept their messages on the unencrypted Internet.
Unlike the telephone program that Snowden revealed, the PRISM
program produced actionable intelligence until the time when
Snowden blew it. General Hayden, who was NSA director during
the three years following the 9/11 attack, wrote that these surveillance
powers, among other things, “uncovered illicit financing networks,
detected suspect travel, discovered ties to aviation schools,
linked transportation employees to associates of terrorists, drew
connections to the illicit purchases of arms, tied U.S. persons to Khalid
Sheikh Mohammed, and discovered a suspect terrorist on the
no-fly list who was already in the United States.” More specifically,
just between 2007 and 2013, according to the testimony of NSA and
FBI officials, it resulted in the preempting of at least forty-five terrorist
attacks. Almost all of the thwarted attacks occurred outside
the jurisdiction of the United States, and therefore did not result in
U.S. prosecutions. One of the plots that targeted Americans was a
planned attack using high explosives on the subways in Grand Central
station and the Times Square station at rush hour in New York
City in 2009. It was averted after British intelligence supplied the
NSA with the e- mail address of the terrorist suspect Najibullah Zazi
in Aurora, Colorado. The PRISM surveillance program then traced it
to an IP address on the watch list associated with Rashid Rauf, an al-
Qaeda bomb maker in Pakistan. Zazi, evidently unaware that e- mails
sent via Yahoo! could be intercepted before they were encrypted
by Yahoo!, continued sending e- mails to Rauf as he prepared to
assemble the bombs in early September 2009. As a result, the NSA
search of its database yielded e- mails from Zazi discussing the proportions
of explosives to be used. These e- mails recovered through
the PRISM program, according to an analysis done for the Senate
Judiciary Committee in 2014, provided the “critical lead” that led to
the arrest of Zazi and his confederates before they could detonate
bombs in the subways of New York City. The members of the House
and Senate Select Committees on Intelligence had no doubt that the
702 program played a key role in aborting this plot they had been
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 294
9/30/16 11:09 AM
The “War on Terror” After Snowden | 295
secretly briefed on in 2009. Dianne Feinstein, the chair of the Senate
Select Committee, pointed out with privileged knowledge that it
saved “subway cars stuffed to the gunwales with people”; Representative
Mike Rogers also spoke with privileged knowledge when he
said on June 9, 2013, referring to the 702 program, “I can tell you in
the Zazi case in New York, it’s exactly the program that was used.”
The third NSA program of interest to terrorists that Snowden
revealed was called XKeyscore. Using Internet data from PRISM, the
NSA had created the equivalent of digital fingerprints for suspected
foreign terrorists on watch lists. The “fingerprint” for each suspect
was based on his or her search pattern on the Internet. These algorithms
made it difficult for suspects to hide on the Internet by using
aliases. Once a suspect was “fingerprinted,” any attempt to evade
surveillance by using a different computer and another user name
would be detected by the XKeyscore algorithms. The “fingerprints”
only worked so long as XKeyscore remained secret from those on
the watch list. After Snowden exposed it, suspects could evade surveillance
by changing their search patterns when they changed their
aliases.
Further enabling furtive Internet users to evade the surveillance
of the government, Snowden offered specific tips about the secret
sources and methods used by both the NSA and the British GCHQ.
He revealed in a public interview, for example, that the GCHQ
had deployed the first “full- take” Internet interceptor that “snarfs
everything, in a rolling buffer to allow retroactive investigation
without missing a single bit.” When asked how to circumvent it,
he replied, “You should never route through or peer with the UK
under any circumstances. Their fibers are radioactive, and even the
Queen’s selfies to the pool boy get logged.” Aside from this warning
about using Internet providers whose wiring passes through Britain,
he also warned Internet users about trusting the encryption of any
U.S.- based Internet company because of their secret relationships
with the NSA. He added that the NSA considered “telecom collaborators
to be the jewels in their crown of omniscience.” He also gave a
warning about the attention the NSA was paying to “jihadi forums.”
He said that to avoid being automatically “targeted” by the NSA,
one needed to avoid them.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 295
9/30/16 8:13 AM
296 | how america lost its secrets
These precise tips for evading U.S. and British surveillance were
not accidentally leaked. Snowden supplied them in written answers
to interrogatives sent to him by Poitras and Appelbaum in May
2013 while he was still on the NSA payroll. He also carefully orchestrated
the exposure of the PRISM surveillance programs, precisely
specifying, as Greenwald writes in his book No Place to Hide, who
was to release the “scoops” in which newspapers. He gave Gellman a
seventy- two- hour ultimatum for exposing PRISM, as we know. He
further provided Poitras with well- organized files for publications
revealing, among other things, that the NSA had paid RSA, a leading
computer security provider, to build flawed encryption protocols,
which allowed the NSA to read encrypted messages on computers
and online video games. In short, he used these journalists to accomplish
his purpose. In light of the way he micromanaged the leaks, it is
difficult to conclude that he did not deliberately plan to compromise
and render useless these U.S. and British operations.
Whatever he intended, he clearly succeeded in blowing the cover
off NSA’s operations authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act for monitoring terrorists’ activities. After all, terrorist
groups are no different from other criminal enterprises in their need
to keep their communications secret from the authorities pursuing
them. If they find out that the police are tapping their phone lines or
intercepting other channels of communication, they can be expected
to either stop using them or use them to divert attention away from
their real plans.
In addition, Snowden suggested an alternative means to those who
wanted to evade government surveillance. He recommended that
they use end- to- end encryption, which results in messages being
encrypted before they are sent over the Internet. He told Greenwald,
for example, that encryption was “critically necessary” for anyone
to evade NSA surveillance. Just as Robert Hanssen had deliberately
compromised the NSA’s interception of Soviet communications in
Washington, D.C., in the 1990s, Snowden deliberately compromised
the NSA’s interception of concealed messages by potential terrorists
on the Internet. We cannot know whether or not any of the jihadists
involved in subsequent terrorist attacks (such as those in Paris or
San Bernardino, California, in 2015) would have used the Internet
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 296
9/30/16 8:13 AM
The “War on Terror” After Snowden | 297
or phone lines more freely if Snowden had not divulged the NSA’s
surveillance of them, but there can be little doubt that his breach
of the secrecy envelope had serious consequences for U.S., French,
and British intelligence. For example, François Molins, the former
head prosecutor of Paris, pointed out that after the Paris attacks the
French investigation had run into an obstacle: end- to- end encryption.
“We can’t penetrate into certain conversations,” he said about
“Telegram,” the end- to- end encryption program that Snowden had
repeatedly recommended, and as a result “we’re dealing with this
gigantic black hole, a dark zone where there are just so many dangerous
things going on.”
The effects of Snowden’s intervention were soon realized by the
CIA, according to Michael Morell, who had closely followed intelligence
about terrorist groups in the Middle East ever since he had
acted as the CIA’s briefer for the president on the day of the 9/11
attack. “Terrorist organizations around the world were already starting
to modify their actions in light of what Snowden disclosed,”
Morell wrote in 2015. “Within weeks of the [Snowden] leaks, communications
sources dried up, tactics were changed.” Even more
disturbing, suspects on the CIA’s watch list began switching to an
“encryption platform.” Instead of continuing to rely on the Internet
to protect their messages, they increased their use of end- to- end
encryption, which defeated the effectiveness of PRISM’s capturing
Internet traffic before it was encrypted by Internet companies.
Indeed, after the Snowden breach, ISIS even provided a tutorial on
its websites about using end- to- end encryption. So Morell and others
at the CIA helplessly watched as this previous source of unexpected
intelligence went dark.
What further heightened Morell’s concern about this sudden loss
of NSA intelligence from these sources was the discovery by the
CIA in January 2014 of two documents, one 26 pages and the other
19 pages, on a captured ISIS computer in Syria. These documents
discussed the advantages of using bubonic plague germs and other
biological weapons against Western civilian populations. They even
provided a religious justification for using biological warfare against
civilian targets in the West. In addition, evidence uncovered from
the safe house used by the ISIS terrorists involved in the Paris attack
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 297
9/30/16 8:13 AM
298 | how america lost its secrets
suggested they had been interested in acquiring radioactive isotopes.
Without the advance warning that the NSA’s surveillance of the preencrypted
Internet had provided in the past, could the CIA now contend
with such unconventional threats?
The NSA also saw its sources disappearing from its surveillance.
Before the Snowden breach, the FBI, the CIA, and the DIA, which
were the NSA’s partners in the PRISM program, had compiled a
watch list of highly active foreign terrorist targets for the NSA’s
PRISM program. These “targets” included logistics officers, bomb
builders, weapons specialists, and suicide bomber recruiters. Until
June 6, 2013, many of these targets had frequently used Internet
services, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Xbox Live, to send what they
believed would be hidden messages. After the PRISM story broke
in The Washington Post on June 6, the NSA “saw one after another
target go dark,” according to a senior NSA executive involved in
that surveillance. The NSA has watched about one thousand of
these targets take “steps to remove themselves from our visibility.”
According to the NSA’s deputy director, Richard Ledgett, in 2016,
the vanishings included a group planning attacks in Europe and the
United States.
Admiral Rogers, the new NSA director, was asked about the damage
done by Snowden. He was blunt and direct. Asked in February
2015 whether or not the disclosures by Snowden had reduced the
NSA’s ability to pursue terrorists, he answered, “Have I lost capability
that we had prior to the revelations? Yes.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 298
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epilogue
The Snowden Effect
Governments can reduce our dignity to something like that of
tagged animals.
— edward snowden, Moscow, 2016
The enormous effect that Snowden has had on America can
be divided into three categories: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
The good proceeds from the national conversation on the issue of
surveillance in 2013 that his disclosures ignited. There is no denying
that Snowden’s dramatic disclosures, despite the damage they did to
U.S. intelligence, accomplished a salutary service in alerting both the
public and the government to the potential danger of a surveillance
leviathan. The steady expansion of the NSA’s collection of telephone
billing records under the cloak of secrecy, for example, revealed a
bureaucratic mission creep that badly needed to be brought under
closer oversight by Congress. Snowden’s breach provided another
benefit. It pointed to the security dangers proceeding from the NSA’s
headlong rush to outsource its computer servicing to private contractors.
Opening this back door, as Snowden amply demonstrated,
greatly increased the risk that America’s secrets would fall into the
hands of its enemies. An intelligence service has little if any value if
it cannot keep secret its sources from its adversaries.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 299
9/30/16 8:13 AM
300 | how america lost its secrets
The conversation that Snowden began is necessary for another
reason. The relentless growth of data- collection technology had
come to endanger personal privacy. Smart phones in our pockets,
GPS recorders in our cars, fitness bands on our wrists, CCTV monitors
in stores, and network- connected devices in our homes leave a
digital trail of every move we make. The government can subpoena
as part of an investigation, as we know, our personal data, including
our Internet searches, social media postings, electronic communications,
and credit card records. In addition, the government has its
own tools of surveillance. Snowden, by disclosing that the government
was vacuuming in phone billing records and Internet activities,
hit a sore spot in the public’s consciousness. How far did the
surveillance state extend? Did an Orwellian government intercept
private conversations of American citizens? Should Apple, Google,
and other Internet giants use a doomsday system of encryption to
prevent court- ordered searches for data? Were there adequate safeguards
against government snooping?
In popular culture, surveillance is often associated with the sinister
measures taken by a totalitarian government to suppress individual
dissidence. On television we see government agents in black
vans operating arrays of tape recorders, following people on the
street, and breaking into homes to steal files and tap telephone lines.
In the 2006 Academy Award– winning film The Lives of Others, for
example, East Germany’s Stasi police use listening devices to gather
information to blackmail intellectuals to assist in the eradication of
dissent. East Germany was not the only place in the Cold War era
using surveillance to suppress dissent. Even in the United States
in the 1950s and 1960s, J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI bugged the phones
of civil rights leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., to root out
suspected subversive elements. Most Americans viewed this as a
reprehensible use of government surveillance, and the very mention
of the word, even before Snowden’s disclosure, evoked disquiet
among the public. But what Snowden exposed was not any sort of
rogue operation but programs authorized by the president and Congress
and approved by fifteen federal judges. If one accepts that the
nation’s security remains a legitimate function of government, the
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 300
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epilogue | 301
issue is not surveillance itself; it is the proper way such surveillance
is conducted.
The NSA surveillance of telephone records that Snowden exposed
was different in its intent from the surveillance of the Cold War. Its
target was a selected list of 300 to 400 foreign jihadists living abroad.
Many of these individuals residing in Syria, Iraq, and Pakistan had
been identified by the FBI and the CIA as active bomb makers, assassins,
and weapon specialists. This was not domestic surveillance, but
when any of these suspects telephoned a phone number in the United
States, the NSA checked the billing records of the domestic phone
number that had been called to determine all the calls emanating
from it. The purpose of this search was to assemble for the FBI a list
of contacts that a foreign suspect might have in the United States. To
expedite this task, it obtained from telephone companies the billing
records, without any names attached, of all their users and stored
them in a single archive under its control. While this surveillance
targeted foreign terrorists, not domestic dissent, the bulk collection
of phone records had the potential for more nefarious use, a danger
that Snowden brought to the public’s attention. As a result, Congress
modified the Patriot Act so that billing records would remain
on the computers of the phone companies for a limited time rather
than on those of the NSA. The NSA could still search them after
obtaining an order from the FISA court, though it could not archive
the data for future use, so little harm to individual privacy could be
done. Snowden deserves a large share of the credit not only for this
change but for making the public aware of domestic surveillance.
The bad part of the equation is that Snowden deeply damaged an
intelligence system that American presidents have relied on for over
six decades. The heart of that system was the sources and methods
used to intercept other nations’ communications. Until Snowden, the
NSA’s wall of secrecy kept these nations from knowing about them
or, in some cases, even realizing that they were vulnerable to interception.
For example, as previously discussed, the NSA had developed
the remarkable ability to tap into an adversary nation’s computers,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 301
9/30/16 8:13 AM
302 | how america lost its secrets
even though they had been isolated from any network. This innovation
had provided President Obama and his national security team
an edge of which our adversaries were unaware from 2008 to 2013.
However, Snowden deliberately nullified this advantage in 2013 by
revealing this technology (which was published in The New York
Times and other newspapers). The vast number of documents that
he compromised contained many other secret sources and methods.
The full extent of the damage Snowden did may never be fully
known, even though the Department of Defense spent the better
part of a year, and tens of thousands of investigative man- hours,
trying to sort out just the compromised sources and methods pertaining
to military and cyber- defense operations. In addition to the
direct and significant cost to taxpayers represented by this investigation,
one measure of how serious the loss has been was revealed by
Michael McConnell, the vice- chairman of the company for which
Snowden had worked at the time of the breach. McConnell stated
publicly, “Snowden has compromised more capability than any spy
in U.S. history.” McConnell had no obvious reason to exaggerate the
loss because his company, Booz Allen Hamilton, was partly responsible
for the damage. It hired Snowden, as will be recalled, even after
its vetters had detected an untruthful statement in his application.
McConnell said, “This will have impact on our ability to do our
mission for the next twenty to thirty years.” By any measure, two
decades of lost intelligence is a steep price to pay.
To be sure, the practical value of peacetime intelligence about
the activities of adversary states is not always evident. What is far
clearer to the public is the value of intelligence that can thwart terrorist
attacks against subways, theaters, and other civilian targets.
We have seen that Snowden also deprived the NSA of much of the
effectiveness of its PRISM program by revealing it, through the articles
published at his specific behest in The Guardian and The Washington
Post that explained how it worked. This single revelation
compromised a system, duly authorized by Congress and the president,
that had been the government’s single most effective tool for
learning in advance about attacks in America and Europe by jihadist
terrorists.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 302
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epilogue | 303
The ugly part of the equation is the rampant growth of the public’s
distrust of the institutions of government in America. According
to recent polls, 4 out of 5 Americans distrust the government.
Snowden did not create this new age of distrust, but his disclosures
greatly contributed to it, as well as to the worldwide distrust of the
U.S. government. This post- Snowden distrust is especially powerful
in the section of the international media that assisted Snowden in
his release of NSA documents. In defending Snowden, it questions
the truthfulness of any government official or member of Congress
who discloses information contradicting Snowden’s claims or showing
that there was some benefit to the multibillion- dollar intelligence
system that he compromised. Even Senator Dianne Feinstein,
who herself fought the secrecy of the CIA for years, was not exempt
from such distrust when she asserted in June 2013 that the program
that Snowden had compromised had helped avert a bloody carnage
on the New York subways in September 2009, as mentioned earlier.
That she was the ranking Democrat on the Senate Select Committee
on Intelligence, and briefed on the program at the time of the attack,
did not prevent a distrustful press from attempting to impeach her
credibility and that of the fourteen other members of the Senate
Select Committee and the twenty members of the House Select
Committee on Intelligence who had affirmed her assertion.
In this culture of distrust, any claim that any of the secrets that
Snowden disclosed could have caused any harm is preemptively dismissed
as government propaganda. Snowden’s word also is taken
over that of government officials because, as The Nation explained,
Snowden speaks “truth to power.” Such a formulation of distrust
allows those who accept it to dismiss all assertions of government
officials representing power who contradict Snowden’s version of
reality. Such is Snowden’s glorified aura that even when his revelations
expose purported U.S. government actions in foreign lands,
including the alleged tapping of friendly government officials’ conversations,
such as Angela Merkel’s, these are implicitly conflated
with the NSA’s domestic surveillance program, around which a
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 303
9/30/16 8:13 AM
304 | how america lost its secrets
popular movement has emerged questioning its purpose and methods.
As a result, a legitimate debate on what should constitute our
domestic liberties— and potential limits to those when facing significant
security concerns— has largely obfuscated in this mind- set
the reality of Snowden’s weakening, durably and structurally, the
critical ability of the United States and its allies to address their
mounting external security challenges. In this culture of distrust,
whatever contradicts the innocent whistle- blower narrative can be
preemptively dismissed because Snowden, even though he remains
ensconced in Moscow at an unknown location, remains the ultimate
truth teller.
I do not accept either this formulation of Snowden or his version
of the events in which he was the hero. Opening a Pandora’s box of
government secrets is a dangerous undertaking. Whether Snowden’s
theft of state secrets proceeded from an idealistic attempt to right a
wrong, a narcissistic drive to obtain personal recognition, an intent to
weaken the foundations of the surveillance infrastructure in which
he worked, or a combination of such factors, by the time he arrived
in Moscow, it had evolved, deliberately or not, but necessarily, into
a mission of disclosing key national secrets to a foreign power. In
the end, such conjectures about Snowden’s motives matter less than
that he was helped, consciously or not, by others with interests that
differed from those of the United States. The effects on America of
such a massive breach of confidence might not easily be reversible.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 304
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Acknowledgments
I am deeply grateful to the many individuals who put their knowledge
and expertise at my disposal during the course of writing this
book. Unfortunately, I cannot give due credit to some of those people
to whom I owe the greatest debt in understanding the intelligence
issues, because they spoke to me on condition that I keep secret their
identities.
I greatly benefited from the insights, erudition, and criticisms provided
by those who read draft chapters at various stages of my investigation.
I am particularly indebted in this regard to Tobias Brown,
Rachelle Bergstein, Richard Bernstein, Sidney Blumenthal, David
Braunschvig, Ash Carter, Susana Duncan, Joe Finder, Ben Gerson,
Andrew Hacker, William Haseltine, Eli Jacobs, Bruce Kovner, Robert
Loomis, Gary Lucas, John Micklethwait, Frederick Mocatta, Andrew
Rosenberg, Curt Sawyer, Sean Wilentz, and Ezra Zilkha.
I am especially grateful to Harold Edgar, the Julius Silver Professor
in Law, Science, and Technology at Columbia Law School; and
to Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law
School, for sharing with me their legal perspective on the espionage
statutes and other legal issues.
I thank Edward Lucas of The Economist for recommending
Catherine A. FitzPatrick, a writer and translator at The Interpreter
magazine as someone who “posseses a unique knowledge of the labyrinthine
world of Russian disinformation.” She proved a godsend
for this book. With her deep understanding of the workings of the
Internet, she helped me retrieve information from the dark side of
the Internet that I would otherwise would not have found.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 305
9/30/16 11:09 AM
306 | Acknowledgments
Because I do not believe an investigative book should be written
without the author visiting the crime scene and other pertinent venues,
I undertook research in Hawaii, Japan, Hong Kong, and Moscow.
Where possible, I flew the same flights that Snowden did. I am grateful
to Ena and Ines Talakic for their assistance on these research trips.
As talented documentarians in their own right, they filmed a number
of my interviews on these trips, and generously provided photographs
for this book. I thank Alexander Bitter in Hawaii, Joyce Xu
in Hong Kong, Ko Shoiya in Japan, and Zamir Gotta, Natalie Filkina,
and Svetlana Chervonnaya in Russia for their help in arranging my
interviews in those places. I also owe special thanks to Nick Grube,
an editor at Civil Beat in Honolulu, for accompanying me to the
NSA base where Snowden was working in 2013.
I am indebted to Nancy Novick for her skill, patience and enterprise
in helping me find the selection of photographs for this book.
I am grateful to Zachary Gresham for his meticulous fact- checking
and proofreading, and to Ingrid Sterner for her immensely helpful
copyediting skills. Because I perform all my own research, I alone am
responsible for any errors that appear in this book.
Mort Janklow, who has represented me for three decades, did a
superb job in arranging for Alfred A. Knopf to publish this book.
I am thankful to Julia Ringo and the team at Knopf for their help
in preparing this book. Finally, I am deeply indebted to Jonathan
Segal for meticulously editing this book. The manuscript gained
immeasurably from both his keen eye and his wise judgment.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 306
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes
prologue Snowden’s Trail: Hong Kong, 2014
3 “No Such Agency”: The best description of the birth of the NSA can be found in
Bamford, Puzzle Palace, 1–4.
4 the NSA learned: General Keith Alexander, interview with author.
4 twelve-minute video: This video can be seen at http://www.theguardian.com
/world/video/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-interview
-video. All of the dozens of videos Snowden made after this initial one can be
viewed in chronological order at https://nsa.gov1.info/dni/snowden.html.
5 I had written several books: My book Inquest examined the failure of the FBI,
the Secret Service, and the CIA to establish the context of the John F. Kennedy
assassination. This interest continued in other books of mine, including Deception,
in which I investigated the vulnerability of intelligence services involved in
espionage during the Cold War, and Agency of Fear (New York: G. P. Putnam’s
Sons, 1977), in which I explored intelligence failures of domestic intelligence in
the war on drugs.
5 extradite Trent Martin: The FBI press statement on this case was released
on March 27, 2013, less than two months before Snowden bought his ticket
for Hong Kong: https://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/australian
-research-analyst-extradited-on-insider-trading-charges.
6 “It’s very mysterious”: Hayden, interview with author.
6 My first surprise: I interviewed six members of the Mira staff, all of whom asked
me not to identify them. Te-Ping Chen, a journalist for the Asian edition of
The Wall Street Journal, received similar replies when she interviewed Mira
hotel employees the day Snowden left the Mira. Chen and Brown, “Snowden’s
Options for Refuge Narrow.”
6 to send Greenwald: Greenwald’s description of his encounters with Snowden
is taken mainly from chapter 1, “Contact,” and chapter 2, “Ten Days in Hong
Kong,” in Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 7–32.
7 Snowden also contacted: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”
7 He proposed we meet: Bradsher, interview with author. Bradsher wrote a number
of excellent articles about Snowden and Ho. See Bradsher, “Hasty Exit Started
with Pizza Inside a Hong Kong Hideout.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 307
9/30/16 8:13 AM
308 | Notes to pages 8–23
8 appointment with Robert Tibbo: Tibbo, interviews with author.
11–12 “angel descending”: Snowden, interview with Brian Williams, NBC, May 28,
2014.
chapter 1 Tinker
15 “It’s like the boiling frog”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
15 Lon Snowden, like his father: The best reporting on Snowden’s childhood was
done by Suzanne Andrews. See Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden
Saga.”
16 Brad Gunson, who knew Snowden: Carol D. Leonnig, Jenna Johnson, and Marc
Fisher, “Who Is Edward Snowden?,” Washington Post, June 15, 2013.
16 Snowden stayed home: Kinsey, interview with author.
16 Posting under the alias: Mullin, “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life on Ars
Technica.”
16 He even went to anime conventions: Christopher Johnson, “Chatting About
Japan with Snowden,” Japan Times, June 18, 2013.
17 “body fat percentage”: Leonnig, Johnson, and Fisher, “Who Is Edward Snowden?”
17 “I’ve always dreamed”: Mullin, “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life on Ars
Technica.”
17 Admiral Barrett: Coast Guard Biography, http://www.uscg.mil/history/people
/Flags/BarrettEBio.pdf. Also, for his FBI career, see http://www1.umn.edu
/humanrts/OathBetrayed/FBI%2047.pdf.
18 Army records show: Author interviews. The U.S. Army spokesman George
Wright stated Snowden was enrolled in the program between May 7, 2004,
and September 28, 2004. The spokesman Colonel David Patterson said, “He
attempted to qualify to become a Special Forces soldier but did not complete the
requisite training and was administratively discharged from the army.”
18 taking a job as a security guard: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden
Saga.”
19 “So sexxxy it hurts”: The information about Snowden’s modeling career comes
from his posts on Ars Technica. See Mullin, “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life on
Ars Technica.”
19 Jonathan Mills, Lindsay’s father: Daniel Bates, “Snowden Totally Abandoned His
Girlfriend When He Fled amid NSA Revelations, Her Dad Says,” Daily Mail,
Jan. 17, 2014. The information about Lindsay Mills comes from her Twitter and
Instagram postings.
19 The CIA’s minimum requirements in 2006: https://www.cia.gov/careers
/application-process.
chapter 2 Secret Agent
22 “It seems to me spies”: Snowden, interview with Williams.
23 team of information technologists: Former CIA officer who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 308
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 23–25 | 309
23 The only person: “Edward Snowden’s Friend Mavanee Anderson Exclusive
Interview,” Last Word, MSNBC, June 12, 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=
beQUMdolBWE.
25 “was trying to break into”: Schmitt, “C.I.A. Warning on Snowden in ’09 Said to
Slip Through the Cracks.”
26 explained the discrepancy: Former CIA officer who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
26 “It was not a stellar”: Drumheller, interviews with author.
26 “e-mail spat”: Snowden was interviewed via the Internet by Risen, “Snowden
Says He Took No Secret Files to Russia.”
26 “totally incapable”: Snowden, interview with Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
27 “through the system”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”
chapter 3 Contractor
28 “Much of what I saw”: Greenwald, Poitras, and MacAskill, “Edward Snowden.”
30 This “free pass”: Tyler Drumheller, interview with author.
30 “So the guy with whom the CIA”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 284.
30 His initial job for Dell: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”
31 Lindsay Mills: The information about Lindsay comes from her postings on Instagram
and her blog L’s Journey, https://twitter.com/lsjourneys. The information
about her and Snowden’s travel to Mount Fuji and other places in Japan
comes from the Little Red Ninja blog written by Jennie Chamberlin: https://www
.facebook.com/Little-Red-Ninja-214045021941347/timeline/.
32 working on a backup system: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden
Saga.”
32 most of the classified data: Source who requested anonymity, interview with
author.
32 spotted a major flaw: Snowden, interview with Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
32 “I actually recommended”: Ibid.
33 Snowden made a ten-day trip: Harris, “What Was Edward Snowden Doing in
India?” Also, Shilpa Phadnis, “Edward Snowden Sharpened His Hacking Skills
in Delhi,” Times of India, Dec. 4, 2013.
33 “It is a dead-end job”: Former Booz Allen official who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
33 shaded by a sakura: The description of Snowden’s life in Maryland comes entirely
from Lindsay Mills’s Internet postings. See L’s Journey.
34 The guest speaker was: Michael Hayden, interview with the author.
34 “They [the NSA] are intent”: Greenwald, Poitras, and MacAskill, “Edward
Snowden.”
34 “none of whom took any action”: Andrea Peterson, “Snowden: I Raised NSA
Concerns Internally over 10 Times Before Going Rogue,” Washington Post,
March 7, 2014. The NSA’s response came from the NSA spokesperson Vanee
Vines in an author interview.
35 U.S. Investigations Services: Dion Nissenbaum, “U.S. Gives New Contract to
Firm That Vetted NSA Leaker Edward Snowden,” Wall Street Journal, July 2,
2014.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 309
9/30/16 8:13 AM
310 | Notes to pages 38–48
chapter 4 Thief
38 In Hawaii in 2012: Former Dell executive who requested anonymity because of
company policy restricting Dell employees from discussing the Snowden case,
interview with author.
38 “You’re in a vaulted space”: Transcript of interview with Snowden in Moscow.
Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”
39 “Law is a lot like medicine”: David Weigel, “Edward Snowden and Ron Paul
Kick Off Libertarian Student Conference,” Bloomberg News, Feb. 13, 2015.
For Ron Paul’s position on “secret government,” see http://www.presstv.ir
/Detail/2015/06/02/413952/US-Ron-Paul-CIA-NSA-secret-government.
39 “The [American] government”: Arundhati Roy, “Edward Snowden Meets
Arundhati Roy and John Cusack,” Guardian, Nov. 28, 2015.
40 “fear and a false image”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
40 Snowden was fully aware: Snowden in Moscow, e-mail interview with James
Risen. Risen, “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files to Russia.”
41 Physical Phatness: Lindsay Mills’s Facebook page, https://www.facebook.com
/lindsay.mills.90/about.
42 the first known document: Ledgett revealed this in an interview with Vanity Fair.
Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”
42 “He stole the [NSA] test”: Snowden’s obtaining the NSA examination is
described by Michael McConnell. See King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details Snowden’s
Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen.” The extended video of the interview is at www
.wsj.com.
42 “It was totally unrealistic”: NSA executive who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
43 subsequently joking to a reporter: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
chapter 5 Crossing the Rubicon
44 “What I came to feel”: Snowden quoted in Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”
44 “was moving copies of that data”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden
Saga.”
45 he later pointed out: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
45 Ledgett subsequently reported: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden
Saga.”
45 This theft was made: Michael Hayden, interview with author.
46 “I crossed that line”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”
46 “We’re subverting our security”: Transcript of Snowden interview on PBS. James
Bamford and Tim De Chant, “Edward Snowden on Cyber Warfare,” Nova, Jan. 8,
2015, www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/military/snowden-transcript.
46 bragged to James Risen: Risen, “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files to
Russia.”
47 this counterculture is “tormented”: Shils, Torment of Secrecy.
47 “[The elites] know everything”: Roy, “Edward Snowden Meets Arundhati Roy
and John Cusack.”
47 “What do you think”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations,
Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”
48 violate U.S. espionage laws: Michael Hayden, interview with author.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 310
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 49–59 | 311
chapter 6 Hacktivist
49 the group Anonymous: Coleman, Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy, 1–8.
50 “My own forays”: Sue Halpern, “In the Depths of the Net,” New York Review of
Books, Oct. 8, 2015.
51 Silk Road, which acted: Holman W. Jenkins Jr., “The Anti-hero of Silk Road,”
Wall Street Journal, June 3, 2015. Also, Justice Department official who requested
anonymity, interview with author.
51 “Tor’s importance”: Hastings, “Julian Assange.” Also see Julian Assange, introduction
to Underground, by Suelette Dreyfus and Julian Assange (Edinburgh:
Canongate, 2012).
51 Tor was a creation: Fitzpatrick, Privacy for Me and Not for Thee, pt. 6.
52 “the state is all-powerful”: Fitzpatrick, introduction to ibid.
53 “Meet the Most Dangerous Man”: Appelbaum, interview with Rolling
Stone, “Meet the Most Dangerous Man in Cyberspace: The American Behind
WikiLeaks,” Rolling Stone, Dec. 2, 2010.
53 In Berlin, Appelbaum: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”
54 she identified herself: Runa A. Sandvik, Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites
/runasandvik/.
54 According to an anonymous: Andy Greenberg, “An NSA Coworker Remembers
the Real Edward Snowden,” Forbes, Dec. 16, 2013.
54 “Without Tor,” he later wrote: Twitter, https://twitter.com/snowden/status
/682257506018672640.
54 “Tor Stinks”: Sean Michael Kerner, “Snowden Leaks Show NSA Targets Tor,”
E Week, Oct. 4, 2013.
55 He would later tell Sandvik: Runa A. Sandvik, “What Edward Snowden Said at
the Nordic Media Festival,” Forbes, May 10, 2015.
55 According to Sandvik’s account: Sandvik did not reveal her encounter with
Snowden in any of her blogs until eleven months after Snowden went public in
June 2013. It was only after Greenwald disclosed in his book No Place to Hide
that Snowden used the alias Cincinnatus that Internet investigators discovered
he had hosted with Sandvik the CryptoParty. Sandvik then wrote her account of
it. See Sandvik, “That One Time I Threw a CryptoParty with Edward Snowden.”
Also, Kevin Poulsen, “Snowden’s First Move Against the NSA Was a Party in
Hawaii,” Wired, May 21, 2014.
56 owner of BoxJelly: Fujihira, interview with author.
57 “The idea was to spread”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 288.
58 “Snowden was not an NSA”: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
chapter 7 String Puller
59 “It wasn’t that they put”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA
Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”
59 He used the same alias: All of Snowden’s post-party activities in 2012 and 2013
come from the Twitter account of “Oahu Crypto Party.”
59 The journalist to whom: The description of Snowden’s attempts to contact
Green wald in December 2012 and January 2013 can be found in Greenwald, No
Place to Hide, 7–10.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 311
9/30/16 8:13 AM
312 | Notes to pages 59–70
59 Greenwald had not always: Mark Memmott, “He Broke the NSA Leaks Story,
but Just Who Is Glenn Greenwald?,” NPR, June 11, 2013. For his part ownership
of the HJ website, see Dareh Gregorian, “Glenn Greenwald, Journalist Who
Broke Edward Snowden Story, Was Once Lawyer Sued over Porn Business,”
Daily News, June 26, 2013. Also, Jessica Testa, “How Glenn Greenwald Became
Glenn Greenwald,” BuzzFeed, June 26, 2013.
60 by “ordering illegal eavesdropping”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 2. On Ron
Paul, see ibid., 24.
60 Freedom of the Press Foundation: Michael Calderone, “Freedom of the Press
Foundation Launches to Support WikiLeaks,” Huffington Post, Dec. 16, 2012.
60 “The first serious info war”: David Sarno, “ ‘Hacktivists’ Fight for Their Cause
Online,” Los Angeles Times, Dec. 11, 2010.
61 “The US operates a sprawling”: Glenn Greenwald, “FBI’s Abuse of the Surveillance
State Is the Real Scandal Needing Investigation,” Guardian, Nov. 13, 2012.
62 Poitras had been diligently filming: Adan Salazar, “Mini Documentary Reveals
Full Extent of ‘Stellarwind’ Domestic Spy Program,” Infowars, Aug. 28, 2012.
62 Poitras had other impressive credentials: “Laura Poitras: Secret No Longer,” New
School News, Aug. 14, 2013.
63 “I didn’t. You chose yourself”: Snowden’s e-mails to Poitras were extracted from
her film Citizenfour and published in Wired. See Greenberg, “These Are the
Emails Snowden Sent to First Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”
63 he wrote to Micah Lee: Lee’s involvement with Snowden, although known to the
journalists Greenwald and Poitras since April 2013, was not revealed to the public
for some eighteen months. Lee, “Ed Snowden Taught Me to Smuggle Secrets
Past Incredible Danger.”
63 “I was at that point filming”: Poitras, interview with Amy Goodman, Democracy
Now, Jan. 15, 2015, http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2015/1/15/oscars
_2015_laura_poitras_film_on.
64 “At this stage”: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to First Introduce
His Epic NSA Leaks.”
65 surveillance of her communications: Glenn Greenwald, “U.S. Filmmaker Repeatedly
Detained at Border,” Salon, April 8, 2012.
65 “Kafkaesque government harassment”: Ben Child, “Citizenfour Director Laura
Poitras Sues US over ‘Kafkaesque Harassment,’ ” Guardian, July 14, 2015.
65 “more paranoid”: Snowden, interview with vanden Heuvel and Cohen,
“Snowden Speaks.”
66 “Is C4 a trap?”: Andy Greenberg, “Snowden’s Chronicler Reveals Her Own Life
Under Surveillance,” Wired, Feb. 4, 2016.
66 Stellarwind: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to First Introduce
His Epic NSA Leaks.”
67 “No one, not even”: Ibid.
68 under enormous stress: Greenberg, “Snowden’s Chronicler Reveals Her Own
Life Under Surveillance.”
69 he had Poitras write: “The Frontline Interviews,” “Barton Gellman,” PBS, March 7,
2014, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics
/united-states-of-secrets/the-frontline-interview-barton-gellman/.
69 Poitras had requested help: Karen Greenberg, interview with the author.
70 Council on American-Islamic Relations: CAIR-NY Blog, “Glenn Greenwald
Speaks at CAIR-NY Annual Banquet,” May 16, 2013.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 312
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 71–80 | 313
71 When they finally settled: The descriptions of the initial two meetings between
Greenwald and Poitras in April 2013 are provided in Greenwald’s 2014 book, No
Place to Hide, pp. 10-15.
chapter 8 Raider of the Inner Sanctum
73 “They think there’s a smoking gun”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
74 system for stratifying its data: Michael McConnell, interview with King, “Ex-
NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen.”
74 Snowden applied to Booz Allen: Booz Allen officer who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
5 “Snowden was an IT guy”: John R. Schindler, “Snowden Is a Fraud,” XX Committee,
June 12, 2015.
75 “get access to lists”: Lana Lam, “Post Reporter Lana Lam Tells of Her Journey
into the Secret World of Edward Snowden,” South China Morning Post, June 23,
2013.
75 “He targeted my company”: King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiring at
Agency, Booz Allen.”
75 he would not have password access: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
75 engaged in a minor subterfuge: Hosenball, “NSA Contractor Hired Snowden
Despite Concerns About Resume Discrepancies.”
76 “playing with fire”: Spencer Ackerman and Ewen MacAskill, “Snowden Calls
for Whistleblower After Claims by New Pentagon Source,” Guardian, May 22,
2016.
76 establish a paper trail: Director of National Intelligence, IC on the Record (blog
on Tumblr), May 27, 2014, http://icontherecord.tumblr.com/post/87218708448
/edward-j-snowden-email-inquiry-to-the-nsa-office. Snowden response, in
“Edward Snowden Responds to Release of E-mail by U.S. Officials,” Washington
Post, May 29, 2014.
77 He returned on April 13: Lindsay Mills’s blog.
77 a brief medical leave: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
77 needed to get passwords: Stephen Braun, “NSA to Congress: Snowden Copied
Co-worker’s Password,” Military Times, Feb. 13, 2014.
78 software applications called spiders: David E. Sanger and Eric Schmitt, “Snowden
Used Low-Cost Tool to Best N.S.A.,” New York Times, Feb. 8, 2014.
78 Finally, Snowden had to: Former intelligence officer who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
78 These later acquisitions: The document can be seen in the National Security
Archives, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB436/docs/EBB-059.pdf.
chapter 9 Escape Artist
80 “I’m not self-destructive”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
80 “I took everything”: Edward Snowden and Peter Taylor, “Are You a Traitor?,”
transcript, Panorama, BBC, Oct. 15, 2015 (aired on BBC Oct. 10, 2015).
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 313
9/30/16 8:13 AM
314 | Notes to pages 80–96
80 At this point: Former DIA officer who requested anonymity, interview with
author.
80 He had visited Hong Kong: Lindsay Mills’s blog.
80 According to Albert Ho: Bradsher, “Hasty Exit Started with Pizza Inside a Hong
Kong Hideout.” Also, Keith Bradsher, interview with author.
81 for the next ten days: Former DIA officer who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
81 “his first priority”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 43.
81 “That whole period”: Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”
81 He e-mailed Gellman: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”
81 Gellman could not make: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 51–52.
82 more pressure on Gellman: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”
82 “I’ve been working on”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 11.
83 Continuing his string pulling : Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent
to First Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”
83 asked Appelbaum to help: Appelbaum, “Edward Snowden Interview.”
84 Greenwald was awaiting: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 16–18.
85 Gibson authorized Greenwald’s trip: The description of The Guardian’s reaction
to Greenwald’s offer of a scoop was reported by Luke Harding, a Guardian
reporter commissioned to write The Snowden Files, a book that Oliver
Stone bought the film rights for from The Guardian for $700,000. See Harding,
Snowden Files, 100–115.
86 Snowden arranged for Micah Lee: Lee, “Ed Snowden Taught Me to Smuggle
Secrets Past Incredible Danger.”
chapter 10 Whistle-blower
88 “They elected me”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations,
Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”
88 “I feel alone”: Lindsay Mills’s blog.
89 “so we don’t have a clue”: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to
First Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”
89 “On timing, regarding meeting”: The description of the meetings with Snowden
in Hong Kong, June 3–June 9, is taken from Poitras’s documentary Citizenfour.
The film can be found at https://thoughtmaybe.com/citizenfour/.
90 “The initial impression”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 30.
90 “Minutes after meeting”: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”
90 One possible reason: Snowden, interview with Williams; Bamford, “Edward
Snowden”; Jane Mayer, “Snowden Calls Russian-Spy Story ‘Absurd’ in Exclusive
Interview,” New Yorker, Jan. 21, 2014.
92 the Guardian policy required: Harding, Snowden Files, 114–16.
94 The next morning he: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”
94 Tibbo and Man planned: Patrick Koehler, “The Hong Kong Layover in Snowden’s
Getaway,” New York Times, Sept. 8, 2016.
94 “I am in a safe house”: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 8.
95 The journalist chosen: Lam, “Post Reporter Lana Lam Tells of Her Journey into
the Secret World of Edward Snowden.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 314
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 98–109 | 315
96 “I was being tailed”: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA Leaker Hidden
in a Moscow Airport.”
chapter 11 Enter Assange
98 “Thanks to Russia”: Julian Assange, “How ‘The Guardian’ Milked Edward
Snowden’s Story,” Newsweek, April 20, 2015.
98 Julian Assange had made: David Leigh and Luke Harding, “Julian Assange: The
Teen Hacker Who Became Insurgent in Information War,” Guardian, Jan. 30,
2011.
99 Sarah Harrison: Sarah Ellison, “The Man Who Came to Dinner,” Vanity Fair,
Oct. 2013.
99 Snowden telephoned Assange: Assange interview, in Giles Whittell, “Julian
Assange Unmasked,” Sunday Times (London), Aug. 29, 2015.
99 “Snowden told me they had abused Manning”: Michael Sontheimer, “Spiegel
Interview with Julian Assange,” Spiegel Online International, July 19, 2015.
100 Assange called Harrison: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA Leaker
Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”
101 “We were working very hard”: Ibid.
101 U.S. government informed: Jane Perlez and Keith Bradsher, “China Said to Have
Made Call to Let Leaker Depart,” New York Times, June 23, 2013.
102 Tibbo wanted Snowden to remain: Tibbo, interview with author.
103 “The purpose of my mission”: Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”
chapter 12 Fugitive
104 “If I end up in chains”: Snowden video on the Guardian site, June 17, 2013, www
.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/jul/17/edward-snowden-video-interview.
104 insert an encrypted key: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”
104 “I can’t help him evade”: Gellman quoted in Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews,
“Snowden Saga.”
105 asked Fidel Narváez: Juan Forero, “Ecuador’s Strange Journey from Embracing
Snowden to Turning Him Away,” Washington Post, July 2, 2013.
106 “My only comment”: Lam, “Post Reporter Lana Lam Tells of Her Journey into
the Secret World of Edward Snowden.”
106 his passage through: Perlez and Bradsher, “China Said to Have Made Call to Let
Leaker Depart.”
107 Snowden first met Harrison: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA Leaker
Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”
107 Assange continued creating: Assange interview, in Whittell, “Julian Assange
Unmasked.”
108 “Anyone in a three-mile radius”: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA
Leaker Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”
108 $20,000 fee: Station KGUN9, “Documents: Snowden Paid 20K for UA Skype
Talk,” ABC 15 Arizona, April 1, 2016, //www.abc15.com/news/region-central
-southern-az/tucson/documents-snowden-paid-20k-for-ua-skype-talk.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 315
9/30/16 8:13 AM
316 | Notes to pages 113–121
109 first live interview in Moscow: Snowden met with James Bamford, the author
of the 1982 book The Puzzle Palace, in Moscow in June 2014. Bamford, “Edward
Snowden.”
chapter 13 The Great Divide
113 “That moral decision”: Edward Snowden, statement, http://wikileaks/statement
-from-Edward-Snowden.
114 “Sitting on his unmade bed”: Packer, “Holder of Secrets.”
114 This powerful narrative: See Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 248–54; Snowden,
interview with Williams.
114 “There was no question”: Emily Bell, “Snowden Interview: Why the Media Isn’t
Doing Its Job,” Columbia Journalism Review, May 10, 2016.
115 When two NSA analysts: “Claim US Spy Caught with Secrets,” Los Angeles
Mirror, Aug. 2, 1960, 1. Also see Rick Anderson, “Before Edward Snowden,”
Salon, July 1, 2013.
115 “man up”: Interview with John Kerry, CBS This Morning, May 28, 2014.
115 By the Lawfare Institute’s count: https://www.lawfareblog.com/snowden
-revelations.
116 British cyber service GCHQ: RT television report, “NSA, GCHQ Targeted
Kaspersky, Other Cyber Security Companies,” June 22, 2015, http://www.rt.com
/usa/268891-nsa-gchq-software-kaspersky/.
116 six government employees: Matt Apuzzo, “C.I.A. Officer Is Found Guilty in Leak
Tied to Times Reporter,” New York Times, Jan. 26, 2015. The notable exception
to the policy of seeking imprisonment of intelligence workers found guilty of
passing classified information to journalists is the extraordinary case of the ex-
CIA director General David Petraeus. Petraeus had given classified information
from his personal notebooks to his mistress and biographer, Paula Broadwell.
Although none of this information appeared in her 2012 biography, All In: The
Education of Davis Petraeus, he had violated his oath to protect this information.
Yet in a 2014 deal with the Justice Department, Petraeus was allowed to
plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge and sentenced to two years’ probation and
a $100,000 fine. See Eli Lake, “Petraeus, Justice, and Washington’s Culture of
Leaks,” Bloomberg View, March 4, 2015.
117 he posted about it: Snowden wrote in chat rooms on the Ars Technica site
between May 2001 and May 2012. His posts are quoted by Mullin, “NSA Leaker
Ed Snowden’s Life on Ars Technica.”
117 “an act of civil disobedience”: Mayer, “Snowden Calls Russian-Spy Story
‘Absurd’ in Exclusive Interview.”
117 Ben Wizner, a lawyer: Wizner called his representation of Snowden the “work of
a lifetime.” Hill, “How ACLU Lawyer Ben Wizner Became Snowden’s Lawyer.”
118 “We’ve crossed lines”: Snowden quoted by Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
119 “Snowden a whistleblower”: Cheryl Arvidson, “Distrust of Government Apparent
in Snowden Case,” Leader’s Edge, Oct. 2013.
119 “they can trust”: “Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government,”
Pew Research Center, Nov. 23, 2015.
119 “Thanks to one man’s”: Rebecca Shabad, “Former Rep. Ron Paul Launches Petition
for Snowden Clemency,” Hill, Feb. 13, 2014.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 316
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 121–129 | 317
119 his son Senator Rand Paul: See Katie Glueck, “Rand Paul Backs Snowden, Bashes
Clapper,” Politico, Jan. 5, 2014.
119 “We actually buy cell phones”: Snowden quoted in “New The Guardian Interview
with Edward Snowden,” Guardian, July 17, 2014, https://www.theguardian
.com/world/2014/jul/18/-sp-edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-interview
-transcript.
121 Dominique Strauss-Kahn: Edward Jay Epstein, “What Really Happened to
Strauss-Kahn,” New York Review of Books, Dec. 22, 2011. Vance made his statement
on the Charlie Rose show, Feb. 19, 2016.
121 Apple made headlines: Mike Isaac, “Apple Still Holds the Keys to Its Cloud Service,
but Reluctantly,” New York Times, Feb. 21, 2016.
121 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Newt Gingrich, “A Government Snoop
That Puts the NSA to Shame,” Wall Street Journal, July 7, 2015.
122 the FISA court: http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/courts_special_fisc
.html.
123 “His approach was”: Ellen Nakashima and Joby Warrick, “For NSA Chief, Terrorist
Threat Drives Passion to ‘Collect It All,’ ” Washington Post, July 14, 2013.
123 Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Charlie Savage and Jonathan Weisman,
“N.S.A. Collection of Bulk Data Is Ruled Illegal,” New York Times, May 5, 2015.
This court decision was stayed three months later on August 27, 2015, by a
three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals on procedural grounds. By this
time, however, the legal issue was rendered moot by Congress. See http://law
.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/2015/.
124 knowledge of the service providers: Timothy B. Lee, “Here’s Everything We
Know About PRISM to Date,” Washington Post, June 12, 2013.
125 “Edward Snowden is not the ‘whistleblower’ ”: Nicole Mulvaney, “NSA Director
Adm. Michael Rogers Discusses Freedom, Privacy, and Security Issues at Princeton
University,” NJ.com, March 14, 2015.
126 “Snowden stole from the United States”: Mark Hosenball, “U.S. Spy Agency
Targets Changed Behavior After Snowden,” Reuters, May 12, 2014.
126 “The vast majority”: “Snowden Leak Could Cost Military Billions: Pentagon,”
NBC News, March 6, 2014.
126 “over 900,000” military files: The document was obtained via a Freedom of
Information request by Vice. See Leopold, “Inside Washington’s Quest to Bring
Down Edward Snowden.”
126 “has caused grave damage”: Hearings Before Senate Select Committee on Intelligence,
Jan. 27, 2014. See http://www.dia.mil/News/SpeechesandTestimonies
/ArticleView/tabid/11449/Article/567078/dia-director-flynn-unauthorized
-disclosures-have-caused-grave-damage-to-our-nat.aspx.
126 The CIA’s assessment: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 298.
127 “the greatest damage”: Transcript of interview with General Keith Alexander,
Australian Financial Review, May 8, 2014, http://www.afr.com/technology/web
/security/interview-transcriptformer-head-of-the-nsa-and-commander-of-the
-us-cyber-command-general-keith-alexander-20140507-itzhw#ixzz3m6TkuRa1.
127 “I don’t look at this”: Jeremy Herb and Justin Sink, “Sen. Feinstein Calls Snowden’s
NSA Leaks an ‘Act of Treason,’ ” Hill, June 6, 2013.
128 duck-rabbit cartoon: Jastrow, Fact and Fable in Psychology, 202–4.
128 “I haven’t shot anybody”: Mark McClish, “The Last Words of Lee Harvey
Oswald,” Statement Analysis, Jan. 3, 2013, http://www.statementanalysis.com
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 317
9/30/16 8:13 AM
318 | Notes to pages 130–141
/lee-harvey-oswald/. Like Snowden, Oswald was a high school dropout from
a broken family who joined an elite unit of the U.S. military but failed to get
an honorable discharge, became hostile to policies of the U.S. government, and
defected to Russia. See Edward Jay Epstein, Legend: The Secret World of Lee Harvey
Oswald (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978), 64–104.
129 Clapper answered that: The transcript was published by The Washington Post,
Jan. 29, 2014. For Clapper’s earlier closed-door testimony, see Steven Aftergood,
“The Clapper ‘Lie’ and the Senate Intelligence Committee,” FAS, Jan. 6, 2014.
130 On his application to Booz Allen: Hosenball, “NSA Contractor Hired Snowden
Despite Concerns About Resume Discrepancies.”
130 in contacting Laura Poitras: Greenberg, “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to
First Introduce His Epic NSA Leaks.”
130 “read” in the news reports: Snowden Q&A, Moscow, July 12, 2013, https://www
.youtube.com/watch?v=yNQSVurlAak.
131 “Consul General–Hong Kong”: James Gordon Meek et al., “NSA Leaker Edward
Snowden Seeks Asylum in Ecuador,” ABC News, June 23, 2013.
131 “had an enormous interest”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 284.
131 the Enigma machines: Sebag-Montefiore, Enigma, 286–94.
chapter 14 The Crime Scene Investigation
133 “Any private contractor”: Snowden, interview with Williams.
133 Fifteen miles northwest: U.S. Navy Information Operations Command, “History
of NIOC Hawaii,” http://www.public.navy.mil/fcc-c10f/niochi/Pages/AboutUs
.aspx.
134 General Alexander: Alexander, interview with author.
134 The NSA had also notified: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
136 NSA did not immediately share: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 283–88.
136 briefed by the NSA: See “Unclassified Declaration of David G. Leatherwood,”
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Case 1:10-cv-02119-RMC
Document 63-8 Filed 04/26/13, https://www.fas.org/sgp/jud/shaffer/042613
-leather.pdf.
137 By late July: Former intelligence executive familiar with the initial investigation
who requested anonymity, interview with author.
137 According to Ledgett: Tabassum Zakaria and Warren Strobel, “After ‘Cataclysmic’
Snowden Affair, NSA Faces Winds of Change,” Reuters, Dec. 13, 2013.
138 “Something is not right”: Transcript of interview with Alexander, Australian
Financial Review, May 8, 2014.
138 This discovery came: “Glenn Greenwald’s Partner Detained at Heathrow Airport
for Nine Hours,” Guardian, Aug. 18, 2013.
139 downloading documents: Ledgett was interviewed in this timeline by Bryan Burrough.
See Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”
139 the chronology: NSA executive who requested anonymity, interview with author.
140 “millions of records”: Snowden interview, German NDR TV, Jan. 26, 2014,
http://www.tagesschau.de/snowden-interview-englisch100.pdf.
140 The FBI could assume: Former Justice Department official with knowledge of the
Snowden case who requested anonymity, interview with author.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 318
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 141–159 | 319
141 “I’m in exile”: Former member of the national security staff who cited State
Department records, interview with author. Also, Jen Psaki, the State Department
spokeswoman, told AP, “As is routine and consistent with US regulations, persons
with felony arrest warrants are subject to having their passport revoked.”
That arrest warrant was issued on June 14, 2013. The State Department Operations
Center alert said “Snowden’s U.S. passport was revoked on June 22, 2013,”
after the Justice Department unsealed the charges that had been filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on June 14, 2013. “The Consul
General in Hong Kong confirmed Hong Kong authorities were notified that Mr.
Snowden’s passport was revoked on June 22,” according to the State Department’s
senior watch officer.
142 had met nearly every day: Miller, “U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden.”
142 Putin admitted: Interview, Channel One, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president
/news/19143.
143 “Vladimir Putin had personally approved”: Jennifer Martinez, “Report: Snowden’s
US Passport Revoked,” Hill, June 23, 2013.
chapter 15 Did Snowden Act Alone?
146 “When you look at the totality”: Hayden, interview with author. Also, “Hayden
Interview,” Meet the Press, NBC-TV, Dec. 15, 2013.
146 whistle-blower Bradley Birkenfeld: David Kocieniewski, “Whistle-Blower
Awarded $104 Million by I.R.S.,” New York Times, Sept. 11, 2012.
147 whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg: Martin Arnold, “Pentagon Papers Charges Are
Dismissed,” New York Times, May 11, 1973.
147 FBI office in Media: Mark Mazzetti, “Burglars Who Took On F.B.I. Abandon
Shadows,” New York Times, Jan. 7, 2014.
147 “treasure trove”: Andrew, The Sword and the Shield, 206.
150 “It is inconceivable to me”: Former Booz Allen executive who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
152 we know that Snowden: Sandvik, “That One Time I Threw a CryptoParty with
Edward Snowden.”
152 The FBI, which was: Senate Intelligence Committee staff member who requested
anonymity, interview with author.
153 “Snowden may have carried out”: Drumheller, interview with author.
153 As Snowden acknowledges: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
154 “absence of evidence”: Carl Sagan, Cosmos (New York: Random House, 1980), 49.
154 “The greatest trick”: Cherkashin, interview with author. The quotation from The
Usual Suspects was adopted by the movie from Charles Baudelaire’s observation
“La plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu’il n’existe pas.”
chapter 16 The Question of When
156 “The NSA was actually”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on Cyber
Warfare.”
156 The career of the KGB mole: Bagley, Spy Wars, 46.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 319
9/30/16 8:13 AM
320 | Notes to pages 159–171
157 A counterespionage review: Member of the PFIAB who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
157 “in that they both used”: Kevin Gosztola, “NSA Inspector General Speaks on
Snowden for First Time,” Shadow Proof, Feb. 25, 2014.
157 KGB major Anatoliy Golitsyn: Bagley, Spy Wars, 6–11.
158 Wang Lijun: Steven Lee Myers and Mark Landler, “Frenzied Hours for U.S. on
Fate of a China Insider,” New York Times, April 17, 2012.
159 “I think Snowden is”: Vincent Kessler, “Snowden Being Manipulated by Russian
Intelligence: Ex-NSA Chief,” Reuters, May 7, 2014.
160 A former CIA officer: Tyler Drumheller, interview with author.
161 “It is not statistically improbable”: Former NSA officer who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
162 “when and how he”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 296.
163 “looking to capitalize on”: Transcript of interview with Alexander, Australian
Financial Review, May 8, 2014.
164 “He can compromise thousands”: Carol J. Williams, “NSA Leaker Edward
Snowden Seeks Return to U.S. on His Terms,” Los Angeles Times, July 22,
2015.
165 “I am still working”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations,
Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”
165 “every facet of Snowden’s communications”: Reitman, “Snowden and
Green wald.”
165 “his hosts”: Richard Byrne Reilly, “Former KGB General: Snowden Is Cooperating
with Russian Intelligence,” VentureBeat, May 22, 2014.
165 “I would lose all respect”: Richard Byrne Reilly, “Former NSA Director: ‘I
Would Lose All Respect for Russia if They Haven’t Fully Exploited Snowden,”
VentureBeat, May 23, 2014.
166 He was put in contact: Kucherena, interview with Der Spiegel, “Snowden’s Lawyer:
‘Russia Will Not Hand Him Over,’ ” Spiegel Online International, June 24,
2013.
166 “Officially, he is my client”: “Snowden in the Kitchen,” Interpreter, Nov. 18,
2013.
167 an interview as “great”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on Cyber
Warfare.”
167 Putin’s telethon: Elias Groll, “Snowden Called in to Putin’s Telethon. Does That
Really Make Him a Kremlin Pawn?,” Foreign Policy, April 17, 2014.
chapter 17 The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing
168 “There’s a zero percent chance”: Risen, “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files
to Russia.”
168 “the instruction manual”: Glenn Greenwald, “ ‘Guardian’ Journalist: Snowden
Docs Contain NSA ‘Blueprint,’ ” USA Today, June 15, 2013.
168 a heart attack: Citizenfour.
168 “keys to the kingdom”: Walter Pincus, “Snowden Still Holding ‘Keys to the
Kingdom,’ ” Washington Post, Dec. 18, 2013. Also, Ledgett interview, 60 Minutes,
CBS, Dec. 15, 2013.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 320
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 171–184 | 321
169 “touched” documents: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
169 more than half the documents: Staff member of the Senate Intelligence Committee
who requested anonymity, interview with author.
170 Snowden also disputed: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
170 via a Vice magazine: Leopold, “Inside Washington’s Quest to Bring Down Edward
Snowden.”
171 previously cited road map: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden Saga.”
171 The compartment logs showed: Former NSA official who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
171 “No intelligence service”: Glenn Greenwald, “Email Exchange Between Edward
Snowden and Former GOP Senator Gordon Humphrey,” Guardian, July 16, 2013.
171 An answer soon came: Sophie Shevardnadze, “ ‘Snowden Believes He Did
Everything Right’: Lawyer Anatoly Kucherena,” SophieCo, RT television, Sept. 23,
2013, //www.rt.com/shows/sophieco/snowden-russia-lawyer-kucherena-214/.
172 “all the reports”: Kucherena, interview with author.
173 Russian cyber service: Former member of the staff of the national security
adviser who requested anonymity, interview with author.
174 State Department explicitly told: Ibid.
175 “I had spent ten years”: Hill, “How ACLU Attorney Ben Wizner Became
Snowden’s Lawyer.”
176 In the case of Stone’s movie: Irina Alexsander, “Edward Snowden’s Long, Strange
Journey to Hollywood,” New York Times Magazine, Sept. 4, 2016.
176 “I went the first six months”: Bell, “Edward Snowden Interview.”
176 “There’s nothing on it”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA
Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”
176–177 former CIA officer Ray McGovern: Mark Hosenball, “Laptops Snowden
Took to Hong Kong, Russia Were a ‘Diversion,’ ” Reuters, Oct. 11, 2013.
177 “break my fingers”: Snowden, interview with Williams. See also Burrough, Ellison,
and Andrews, “Snowden Saga,” and Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
178 “said they believed that”: Perlez and Bradsher, “China Said to Have Made Call to
Let Leaker Depart.”
178 “Both the Chinese and the Russians”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 284.
179 “What I can say”: Snowden interview, ARD-TV, Jan. 26, 2014, https://docs
.google.com/file/d/0B95Id3j0M0lrdDA5WIZd11Ubjg/preview.
179 She urgently texted Snowden: Citizenfour.
180 Poitras’s co-interrogator: Appelbaum, “Edward Snowden Interview.”
180 there was no document: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
180 He reported that no: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
181 another person in the NSA: Ibid.
181 Greenwald suggested to the New York Times: Jo Becker, Steven Erlanger and Eric
Schmitt, “How Russia Often Benefits When Julian Assange Reveal’s the West’s
Secrets, “ New York Times, Sept. 1, 2016.
181 Greenwald and Poitras: “Snowden Leak: Israeli Commandos Killed Syrian General
at Dinner Party,” Jerusalem Post, July 16, 2015.
182 Specifically, it disclosed: Cora Currier and Henrik Moltke, “Spies in the Sky,”
Intercept, Jan. 28, 2016.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 321
9/30/16 11:09 AM
322 | Notes to pages 185–199
182 Putin had publicly enjoined him: Interview, Channel One, http://en.kremlin
.ru/events/president/news/19143. Also, former Russian intelligence officer who
requested anonymity, interview with author.
183 “If Snowden didn’t give”: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
183 German federal prosecutor: Theodore Schleifer, “Germany Drops Probe into U.S.
Spying on Merkel,” CNN Politics, June 13, 2015.
184 “Russian planners might have”: Adam Entous, Julian E. Barnes, and Siobhan
Gorman, “U.S. Scurries to Shore Up Spying on Russia,” Wall Street Journal,
March 24, 2014.
184 Britain also discovered: Tom Harper, Richard Kerbaj, and Tim Shipman, “British
Spies Betrayed to Russians and Chinese,” Sunday Times (London), June 14, 2015.
184 “losing some of its capabilities”: Chris Strohm and Gopal Ratnam, “NSA Leader
Seeks Openness on Secret Surveillance Orders,” Bloomberg News, June 13, 2013.
Also, staff member of National Security Council who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
chapter 18 The Unheeded Warning
185 “The NSA—the world’s”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 287.
185 Alexander Poteyev: Sergei L. Loiko, “Former Russian Spymaster Convicted of
Treason,” Los Angeles Times, June 28, 2011.
186 “live under cover in the West”: Pavel Sudoplatov, Special Tasks: The Memoirs of
an Unwanted Witness (Boston: Little, Brown, 1994), xxii.
186 The CIA learned of this: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
187 “the business of intelligence”: Angleton, interview with author.
187 preparing these “Americans”: FBI, “Operation Ghost Stories: Inside the Russian
Spy Case,” Oct. 31, 2011, https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/october
/russian_103111/russian_103111.
188 NSA at Fort Meade: Gertz, “Counterspies Hunt Russian Mole Inside National
Security Agency.” Also, Bill Gertz, interview with author.
188 “They [were] looking for one”: John R. Schindler, “The Painful Truth About
Snowden,” XX Committee, http://20committee.com/2015/07/19/the-painful
-truth-about-snowden/.
188 “insider threats by trusted insiders”: Gellman and Miller, “ ‘Black Budget’ Summary
Details U.S. Spy Network’s Successes, Failures, and Objectives.”
189 The preemptive arrests: Gregory L. White, “Russia Convicts Former Spy Official
for Exposing Agents in U.S. Ring,” Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2011.
189 turned up no evidence: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
190 “broke the record”: Tennent H. Bagley, Spymaster (New York: Skyhorse, 2015), 3.
190 Russia had dispatched: Weiner, Legacy of Ashes, 450–51. Also, Walter Pincus,
“CIA Passed Bogus News to Presidents,” Washington Post, Oct. 31, 1995.
190 “There are no rivers”: Baker, “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey for
Hackers.”
191 “The best defense”: Former NSA official who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 322
9/30/16 8:13 AM
chapter 19 The Rise of the NSA
Notes to pages 199–214 | 323
195 “There are many things”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA
Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”
196 By 1914, the U.S. Army: National Security Agency, Pearl Harbor Review: The
Black Chamber, NSA, 2009, https://www.nsa.gov/about/cryptologic_heritage
/center_cryptologic_history/pearl_harbor_review/black_chamber.shtml.
196 “Its far-seeking eyes”: Kahn, Codebreakers, 358.
198 The NSA also organized: Woodward, Veil, 471–75.
198 In 1980, President Ronald Reagan: David R. Shedd, “How Obama Unilaterally
Chilled Surveillance,” Wall Street Journal, Nov. 30, 2015.
198 “We are approaching”: Turner, Secrecy and Democracy, 92.
198 “vastness”: Woodward, Veil, 202.
199 James Bond provision: Ian Cobain, “How Secret Renditions Shed Light on MI6’s
Licence to Kill and Torture,” Guardian, Feb. 13, 2012.
199 The NSA had assiduously: Kevin Poulsen, “New Snowden Leak Reports
‘Groundbreaking’ NSA Crypto-cracking,” Wired, Aug. 29, 2013.
200 “Yes, my continental European friends”: Woolsey, “Why We Spy on Our Allies.”
200 “very foundation of U.S. intelligence”: John McLaughlin, “We Need NSA to Do
What It Does—It Makes Us Safer,” Press of Atlantic City, Jan. 8, 2014.
201 It made leading hacktivists: Charlie Savage et al., “Hunting for Hackers, N.S.A.
Secretly Expands Internet Spying at U.S. Border,” New York Times, June 4,
2015.
202 “one of the most regulated”: De, “Former NSA Lawyer on ‘Harm’ of Edward
Snowden’s Revelations.”
203 the attack on Sony: Rob Lever, “Some Experts Still Aren’t Convinced That North
Korea Hacked Sony,” Business Insider, Dec. 30, 2014.
204 “The Chinese are viewed”: Alexander quoted in Kelley Vlahos, “America’s
Already-Failed Cyber War,” American Conservative, July 23, 2015.
204 “We are bolstering our support”: “Black Budget: Congressional Budget Justification
Excerpt,” Washington Post, Aug. 30, 2013.
205 These compartments were: Former NSA officer who requested anonymity, interview
with author.
205 “The queen on our chessboard”: Former NSA officer who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
205 to confront flagging morale: Hayden, interview with author.
205–206 “the nation has lost”: Mulvaney, “NSA Director Adm. Michael Rogers Discusses
Freedom, Privacy, and Security Issues at Princeton University.”
206 Although repairing the damage: King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiring
at Agency, Booz Allen.”
chapter 20 The NSA’s Back Door
207 “You have private for-profit”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on
Cyber Warfare.”
208 According to a report: “Out of Control,” NSA, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu
/NSAEBB/NSAEBB424/docs/Cyber-009.pdf.
211 “All of us just fell”: Baker, “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey for Hackers.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 323
9/30/16 8:13 AM
324 | Notes to pages 214–231
212 “it stays secret”: De, “Former NSA Lawyer on ‘Harm’ of Edward Snowden’s
Revelations.”
212 North Korea in 1968: John Prados and Jack Cheevers, “USS Pueblo: LBJ Considered
Nuclear Weapons,” National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book
No. 453, Jan. 23, 2014.
212 Booz Allen Hamilton: Booz Allen Hamilton issued a history of its evolution in
2004. “Helping Clients Envision the Future,” PDF file, 2004, https://www.booz
allen.com/content/dam/boozallen/documents/90th-History-Book-Complete
.pdf.
213 The private company named: Julie Creswell, “The Private Equity Firm That
Grew Too Fast,” New York Times, April 24, 2015.
214 USIS had prematurely closed: Tom Hamburger and Debbi Wilgoren, “Justice
Department Says USIS Submitted 665,000 Incomplete Background Checks,”
Washington Post, Jan. 23, 2014.
214 USIS was also open to: Ellen Nakashima, “DHS Contractor Suffers Major Computer
Breach, Officials Say,” Washington Post, Aug. 6, 2014.
214 successful 2011 attack: Andy Greenberg, “Anonymous Hackers Breach Booz
Allen Hamilton,” Forbes, July 11, 2011.
215 a computer system called e-QIP: Joe Davidson, “Federal Background Check System
Shut Down Because of ‘Vulnerability,’ ” Washington Post, June 29, 2015.
215 this memorandum noted: Former NSA executive who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
chapter 21 The Russians Are Coming
217 “The collapse of the Soviet Union”: Nick Allen, “Soviet Break-Up Was Geopolitical
Disaster, Says Putin,” Telegraph, April 26, 2005.
217 Russian units had managed: Entous, Barnes, and Gorman, “U.S. Scurries to
Shore Up Spying on Russia.”
218 Russian acronym SORM: Steven Aftergood, “The Red Web: Russia and the
Internet,” FAS, Oct. 5, 2015.
219 William Martin and Bernon Mitchell: David P. Mowry, “Betrayers of the Trust,”
Cryptologic Almanac 50th Anniversary Series (NSA), Feb. 28, 2003.
220 Victor Norris Hamilton: “American Defector Is Found in Russian Prison,” New
York Times, June 4, 1992.
220 He was found dead: Edward Jay Epstein, “The Spy Wars,” New York Times,
Sept. 28, 1980.
222 Harold Nicholson: Elizabeth Farnsworth, “Update on the Case of CIA Agent
Harold Nicholson,” PBS (transcript), Nov. 19, 1996. See also “Affidavit in Support
of Complaint, Arrest Warrant, and Search Warrants: United States v. Harold
J. Nicholson,” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm
/ciaspy/affidavt.htm.
223 When it comes to recruiting moles: Angleton, interviews with author.
224 well experienced with false flags: Epstein, Deception, 22–28.
224 the “Trust” deception: Ibid. Also, Raymond Rocca (the CIA’s former research
chief for the counterintelligence staff), interview with author.
227 “a learning experience”: “Out of Control.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 324
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 232–252 | 325
228 127-page Standard Form 86: David Larter and Andrew Tilghman, “Military
Clearance OPM Data Breach ‘Absolute Calamity,’ ” Navy Times, June 18,
2015.
229 Under Putin: Nicole Perlroth, “Online Security Experts Link More Breaches to
Russian Government,” New York Times, Oct. 28, 2014.
229 “It is next to impossible”: Schneier quoted in Jenkins, “Anti-hero of Silk Road.”
230 The Silk Road founder: Jenkins, “Anti-hero of Silk Road.” Also, former Justice
Department official who requested anonymity, interview with author.
230 “better cyber security”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 291.
chapter 22 The Chinese Puzzle
231 “The first [false assumption]”: Snowden video in Hong Kong.
231 “China its first credible”: 2014 Annual Report to Congress by the U.S.-China
Economic and Security Review Commission, quoted in David Tweed, “China
Takes Nuclear Weapons Undersea Away from Prying Eyes,” Bloomberg Business,
Dec. 8, 2014.
232 “results of decades”: Select Committee, U.S. Congress, Report, 1999, http://
www.house.gov/coxreport/chapfs/over.html.
233 a vast enterprise in China: Nir Kshetri, The Rapidly Transforming Chinese High-
Technology Industry and Market (London: Chandos, 2008), 92.
233 By 2007, Paul Strassmann: “China Has .75M ‘Zombie Computers’ in U.S.,” UPI,
Sept. 17, 2007.
234 cyber attack had harvested: David E. Sanger and Julie Hirschfeld Davis, “Hackers
May Have Obtained Names,” New York Times, June 11, 2015.
234 “Those records are”: Baker, “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey for Hackers.”
235 any attempt to “monopolize”: Patrick Goodenough, “Chinese President in Veiled
Warning to the US: Don’t Try to ‘Monopolize Regional Affairs,’ ” CNS News,
May 22, 2014.
236 Chinese intelligence maintains: Former U.S. intelligence officer stationed in
Hong Kong who requested anonymity, interview with author.
236 “hostile territory”: Drumheller, interview with author.
chapter 23 A Single Point of Failure
238 “the single point of failure”: Gellman, “Code Name ‘Verax.’ ”
239 “Snowden thinks he is smart”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 285.
239 “The purpose of my [Hong Kong]”: Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”
240 “This guy”: Ibid.
240–241 “It was a nervous period”: Ibid.
242 “I’m not going to”: Dave Boyer, “Obama on Snowden: ‘I’m Not Going to Be
Scrambling Jets to Get a 29-Year-Old Hacker,’ ” Washington Times, June 27,
2013.
243 “huge strategic setback”: Harper, Kerbaj, and Shipman, “British Spies Betrayed
to Russians and Chinese.”
243 Adding insult to injury: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “Snowden Speaks.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 325
9/30/16 8:13 AM
326 | Notes to pages 252–280
chapter 24 Off to Moscow
247 “They talk about Russia”: Bamford and De Chant, “Edward Snowden on Cyber
Warfare.”
247 Before flying to Moscow: Stone, interview with author.
248 $1 million: Mike Fleming Jr., “Oliver Stone Buys Edward Snowden Russian
Lawyer’s ‘Novel’ About Asylum-Seeking Whistleblower,” Deadline, June 10,
2014.
249 “I have been trying”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
249 “There is only one door”: Gotta, e-mail exchange with author.
250 “A special operation”: Gridasov, Yavlyansky, and Gorkovskaya, “Secret Services
in Moscow with WikiLeaks Conducted Operation Snowden.”
251 “If they [the U.S. government]”: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “Snowden Speaks.”
251 Over a hundred reporters: Irina Galushka, interview with author.
251 A statement posted: “Statement from Edward Snowden in Moscow,” https://
WikiLeaks.org/Statement-from-Edward-Snowden-in.html.
252 Sarah Harrison, Snowden’s companion: Corbett, “How a Snowdenista Kept the
NSA Leaker Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”
252 So either the rule: The maximum stay is listed on the hotel’s website, http://
www.v-exp.ru/en/price/.
253 “It was a total vanishing act”: Piskunov, interview with author.
Chapter 25 Through the Looking Glass
254 “There’s definitely a deep state”: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “Snowden Speaks.”
255 according to Cherkashin: Cherkashin, interview with author.
258 Pelton had left the NSA: George E. Curry, “Ex-intelligence Expert Guilty of
Espionage,” Chicago Tribune, June 6, 1986.
chapter 26 The Handler
261 “As for [Snowden’s] communication”: Kucherena interview, Shevardnadze,
“Snowden Believes He Did Everything Right.”
261 learned from a Russian researcher: Vassili Sonkine, interview with author.
261 When I had been investigating: Edward Jay Epstein, The Annals of Unsolved
Crime (Brooklyn: Melville House, 2013), 209–40.
262 “I don’t know him”: Lugovoy, interview with author.
264 It was rare: The vast majority of the fifteen American defectors to the Soviet
Union in the Cold War, including Joel Barr, Morris and Lona Cohen, Victor Hamilton,
Edward Lee Howard, George Koval, Bernon Mitchell, William Martin, Isaiah
Oggins, Alfred Sarant, Robert E. Webster, and Flora Wovschin, were involved
in espionage. The remaining three, Harold M. Koch, a Catholic priest protesting
the Vietnam War; Arnold Lockshin, a Communist Party organizer; and Lee
Harvey Oswald, a U.S. marine, defected for idealistic principles. All were given
asylum, and two, Webster and Oswald, redefected to the United States.
265 “It was totally bizarre”: Lokshina, interview with author. Also, “Meeting Edward
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 326
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Notes to pages 281–293 | 327
Snowden,” Dispatches, July 13, 2015, https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/07/12
/dispatches-meeting-edward-snowden.
265 “I will be submitting”: “Statement by Edward Snowden,” July 12, 2013, https://
WikiLeaks.org/Statement-by-Edward-Snowden-to.html.
265 “When I accepted the case”: Kucherena, interview with author.
265 Kucherena had personally approved: Shevardnadze, interview with author.
chapter 27 Snowden’s Choices
272 Presidential Policy Directive 20: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 75.
272 to trace the theft: Michael Hayden, interview with author.
273 “For our enemies”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 294.
274 “I had a special level”: Snowden and Taylor, “Are You a Traitor?”
277 “You should remain anonymous”: Burrough, Ellison, and Andrews, “Snowden
Saga.”
279 He was also willing: Snowden and Taylor, “Are You a Traitor?”
280 “The mission’s already accomplished”: Gellman, “Edward Snowden, After
Months of NSA Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.”
chapter 28 The Espionage Source
281 “The government’s investigation failed”: Bamford, “Edward Snowden.”
282 “If I were providing information”: Transcript of interview with Snowden in
Moscow, Rusbridger and MacAskill, “I, Spy.”
282 Pelton, for example: Victor Cherkashin, interview with author.
283 “This debriefing could not”: Intelligence source who requested anonymity,
interview with author.
285 Mike Rogers, the chairman: “Congressman Says Snowden Planned Escape to
China,” UPI, June 16, 2013.
285 “a known unknown”: Donald Rumsfeld, press conference at NATO headquarters,
Brussels, Belgium, June 6, 2002.
chapter 29 The “War on Terror” After Snowden
287 “Because of a number”: Amy Davidson, “Don’t Blame Edward Snowden for the
Paris Attacks,” New Yorker, Nov. 19, 2015.
287 On the evening of: David Gauthier-Villars, “Paris Attacks Show Cracks in
France’s Counterterrorism Effort,” Wall Street Journal, Nov. 23, 2015.
289 According to a declassified: Charlie Savage, “NSA Discloses Inspector General
Report,” New York Times, Feb. 16, 2016.
289 “the number one source”: “NSA Slides Explain the PRISM Data-Collection Program,”
Washington Post, June 6, 2013.
290 according to the testimony: Ellen Nakashima, “Officials: Surveillance Programs
Foiled More Than 50 Terrorist Plots,” Washington Post, June 18, 2013. Details of
four of the plots were then released by the House Select Committee on Intelligence,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 327
9/30/16 8:13 AM
328 | Notes to pages 293–299
http://intelligence.house.gov/1-four-declassified-examples-more-50-attacks
-20-countries-thwarted-nsa-collection-under-fisa-section.
290 Grand Central station: Mark Hosenball, “U.S. NSA Internet Spying Foiled Plot
to Attack New York Subways: Sources,” Reuters, June 7, 2013.
290 provided the “critical lead”: Marshall Erwin, “Connecting the Dots,” U.S. Senate
Committee on the Judiciary, Jan. 13, 2014,.
290 “I can tell you”: Rogers quoted in Ed Pilkington and Nicholas Watt, “NSA Surveillance
Played Little Role in Foiling Terror Plots, Experts Say,” Guardian, June
12, 2013.
290 The third NSA program: Glenn Greenwald, “XKeyscore: NSA Tool Collects
‘Nearly Everything a User Does on the Internet,’ ” Guardian, July 31, 2013.
291 Further enabling furtive Internet: Appelbaum, “Edward Snowden Interview.”
291 These precise tips: Joseph Menn, “Exclusive: Secret Contract Tied NSA and
Security Industry Pioneer,” Reuters, Dec. 20, 2013.
291 as Greenwald writes: Greenwald, No Place to Hide, 2.
292 “We can’t penetrate”: Rebecca Savransky, “Head Prosecutor of Paris Attacks
Encryption Program,” Hill, March 13, 2016.
293 “Terrorist organizations”: Morell, Great War of Our Time, 294.
293 What further heightened Morell’s concern: Ibid., 315.
293 In addition, evidence: Milan Schreuer and Alissa J. Rubin, “Video Found in Belgium
May Point to a Bigger Plot,” New York Times, Feb. 18, 2016.
294 “saw one after another”: Mary Louise Kelly, “NSA: Fallout from Snowden Leaks
Isn’t Over, but Info Is Getting Old,” NPR, March 16, 2016.
294 “Have I lost capability”: Bill Gertz, “NSA Director: Snowden’s Leaks Helped
Terrorists Avoid Tracking,” Washington Free Beacon, Feb. 24, 2015.
epilogue The Snowden Effect
295 “Governments can reduce our dignity”: Edward Snowden, “Governments Can
Reduce Our Dignity to That of Tagged Animals,” Guardian, May 3, 2016.
298 published in The New York Times: David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker, “N.S.A.
Devises Radio Pathway into Computers,” New York Times, Jan. 14, 2014.
298 “Snowden has compromised more”: McConnell interview, King, “Ex-NSA Chief
Details Snowden’s Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen.”
299 a distrustful press: Pilkington and Watt, “NSA Surveillance Played Little Role
in Foiling Terror Plots, Experts Say.” The first “expert” was Michael Dowling, a
Denver-based attorney who acted as Zazi’s defense counsel. He said he had no
access to the undisclosed basis of the government position because Zazi pleaded
guilty in 2011. The second expert was David Davis, a British MP, who was in the
shadow government of the Conservative Party. He resigned from the shadow
government in June 2008, more than a year before the Zazi arrest. In any case,
because the PRISM program was a closely held secret, he would not have had,
and does not claim to have had, access to it.
299 Snowden speaks “truth to power”: Vanden Heuvel and Cohen, “Snowden
Speaks.”
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 328
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Selected Bibliography
selected books
Andrew, Christopher. The Sword and the Shield. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
Bagley, Tennent H. Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games. New Haven, Conn.:
Yale University Press, 2008.
Bamford, James. The Puzzle Palace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1982.
Coleman, Gabriella. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous.
New York: Verso, 2015.
Epstein, Edward Jay. Deception: The Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIA. New
York: Simon & Schuster, 1989.
———. Inquest: The Warren Commission and the Establishment of Truth. New York:
Viking Press, 1966.
Fitzpatrick, Catherine A. Privacy for Me and Not for Thee: The Movement for Invincible
Personal Encryption, Radical State Transparency, and the Snowden Hack. New York:
Catherine A. Fitzpatrick, 2014.
Greenberg, Karen J. Rogue Justice: The Making of the Security State. New York: Crown,
2016.
Greenwald, Glenn. How Would a Patriot Act? Defending American Values from a President
Run Amok. San Francisco: Working Assets, 2006.
———. No Place to Hide. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014.
Harding, Luke. The Snowden Files. New York: Vintage, 2014.
Hayden, Michael V. Playing to the Edge. New York: Penguin, 2016.
Jastrow, Joseph. Fact and Fable in Psychology. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1900.
Kahn, David. The Codebreakers. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1967.
Lucas, Edward. The Snowden Operation. Seattle: Amazon Digital Services, 2015.
Morell, Michael J. The Great War of Our Time. New York: Twelve, 2015.
Sebag- Montefiore, Hugh. Enigma: The Battle for the Code. New York: John Wiley and
Sons, 2001.
Shils, Edward. The Torment of Secrecy: The Background and Consequences of American
Security Policies. Chicago: Free Press, 1956.
Turner, Stansfield. Secrecy and Democracy: The CIA in Transition. New York: Houghton
Mifflin, 1985.
Weiner, Tim. Legacy of Ashes. New York: Doubleday, 2007.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 329
9/30/16 8:13 AM
330 | Selected Bibliography
Woodward, Bob. Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA, 1981– 1987. New York: Simon &
Schuster, 2005.
selected articles
Appelbaum, Jacob. “Edward Snowden Interview: The NSA and Its Willing Helpers.”
Spiegel Online, July 8, 2013.
Baker, Gerard. “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy Prey for Hackers.” Wall Street Journal,
June 22, 2015.
Bamford, James. “Edward Snowden: The Untold Story.” Wired, Aug. 2014.
Bradsher, Keith. “Hasty Exit Started with Pizza Inside a Hong Kong Hideout.” New York
Times, June 24, 2013.
Burrough, Bryan, Sarah Ellison, and Suzanna Andrews. “The Snowden Saga.” Vanity
Fair, May 2014.
Chen, Te- Ping, and Ken Brown. “Snowden’s Options for Refuge Narrow.” Wall Street
Journal, June 10, 2013.
Corbett, Sara. “How a Snowdenista Kept the NSA Leaker Hidden in a Moscow Airport.”
Vogue, Feb. 19, 2015.
De, Rajesh. “Former NSA Lawyer on ‘Harm’ of Edward Snowden’s Revelations.”
Bloomberg, July 27, 2015.
Gellman, Barton. “Code Name ‘Verax’: Snowden, in Exchanges with Post Reporter,
Made Clear He Knew Risks.” Washington Post, June 9, 2013.
— — — . “Edward Snowden, After Months of NSA Revelations, Says His Mission’s
Accomplished.” Washington Post, Dec. 23, 2013.
Gellman, Barton, and Greg Miller. “ ‘Black Budget’ Summary Details U.S. Spy Network’s
Successes, Failures, and Objectives.” Washington Post, Aug. 25, 2013.
Gertz, Bill. “Counterspies Hunt Russian Mole Inside National Security Agency.” Washington
Times, Dec. 1, 2010.
Greenberg, Andy. “These Are the Emails Snowden Sent to First Introduce His Epic NSA
Leaks.” Wired, Oct. 13, 2014.
Greenwald, Glenn, Laura Poitras, and Ewen MacAskill. “Edward Snowden: The Whistleblower
Behind the NSA Surveillance Revelations.” Guardian, June 9, 2013.
Gridasov, Andrei, Igor Yavlyansky, and Mary Gorkovskaya. “Secret Services in Moscow
with WikiLeaks Conducted Operation Snowden.” Izvestia, June 23, 2013.
Harris, Shane. “What Was Edward Snowden Doing in India?” Foreign Policy, Jan. 13,
2014.
Hastings, Michael. “Julian Assange: The Rolling Stone Interview.” Rolling Stone, Jan.
18, 2012.
Hill, Kashmir. “How ACLU Attorney Ben Wizner Became Snowden’s Lawyer.” Forbes,
March 10, 2014.
Hosenball, Mark. “NSA Contractor Hired Snowden Despite Concerns About Resume
Discrepancies.” Reuters, June 20, 2013.
King, Rachael. “Ex- NSA Chief Details Snowden’s Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen.” Wall
Street Journal, Feb. 4, 2014.
Lam, Lana. “Whistle- Blower Edward Snowden Talks to the South China Morning Post,”
South China Morning Post, June 23, 2013.
Lee, Micah. “Ed Snowden Taught Me to Smuggle Secrets Past Incredible Danger.” Intercept,
Oct. 28, 2014.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 330
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Selected Bibliography | 331
Leopold, Jason. “Inside Washington’s Quest to Bring Down Edward Snowden.” Vice,
June 4, 2015.
Miller, Greg. “U.S. Officials Scrambled to Nab Snowden.” Washington Post, June 14,
2014.
Mullin, Joe. “NSA Leaker Ed Snowden’s Life on Ars Technica.” Ars Technica, June 13,
2013.
Packer, George. “The Holder of Secrets.” New Yorker, Oct. 20, 2014.
Reitman, Janet. “Snowden and Greenwald.” Rolling Stone, Dec. 4, 2013.
Risen, James. “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files to Russia.” New York Times, Oct.
17, 2013.
Rusbridger, Alan, and Ewen MacAskill. “I, Spy: Edward Snowden in Exile.” Guardian,
July 18, 2014.
Sandvik, Runa A. “That One Time I Threw a CryptoParty with Edward Snowden.”
Forbes, May 27, 2014.
Schmitt, Eric. “C.I.A. Warning on Snowden in ’09 Said to Slip Through the Cracks.”
New York Times, Oct. 10, 2013.
vanden Heuvel, Katrina, and Stephen F. Cohen. “Snowden Speaks: A Sneak Peek at an
Exclusive Interview.” Nation, Oct. 10, 2014.
Woolsey, R. James. “Why We Spy on Our Allies.” Wall Street Journal, March 17, 2000.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 331
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 332
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index
<TK> 16pages
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 333
9/30/16 8:13 AM
334 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 334
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 335
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 335
9/30/16 8:13 AM
336 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 336
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 337
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 337
9/30/16 8:13 AM
338 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 338
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 339
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 339
9/30/16 8:13 AM
340 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 340
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 341
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 341
9/30/16 8:13 AM
342 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 342
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 343
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 343
9/30/16 8:13 AM
344 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 344
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 345
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 345
9/30/16 8:13 AM
346 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 346
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 347
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 347
9/30/16 8:13 AM
348 | Index
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 348
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Index | 349
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 349
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 350
9/30/16 8:13 AM
illustration credits
Edward Snowden on video shown in Hong Kong: AP Photo/Kin Cheung
NSA base on Oahu: Courtesy Ena and Ines Talakic
Barton Gellman: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras in Hong Kong: AP Photo/John Minchillo
Mira hotel: Courtesy Ena and Ines Talakic
Room 1014 at the Mira: Courtesy Ena and Ines Talakic
Keith Alexander: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Vladimir Putin: AP Photo/Ivan Sekretarev
Julian Assange: Anthony Devlin/PA Wire
Russian airline Aeroflot: Courtesy Ena and Ines Talakic
Michael Hayden: Rex Features via AP Images
U.S. base at Yokota: Courtesy Ena and Ines Talakic
Snowden’s home in Hawaii: Courtesy Ena and Ines Talakic
Lindsay Mills: Luis Silos
NSA headquarters: AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File
Jacob Appelbaum: Axel Heimken via AP Images
Runa Sandvik: AP Photo/John Locher
CryptoParty: Courtesy Ena and Ines Talakic
Anatoly Kucherena: AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko
Snowden’s first appearance in Russia: Human Rights Watch, Tanya Lokshina
Anna Chapman: AP Photo/Sergei Karpukhin, Pool, File
Poitras, Greenwald, and Mills: Kevin Winter/Getty Images
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 351
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 352
9/30/16 8:13 AM
a note about the author
Edward Jay Epstein graduated from Cornell University and
received a Ph.D. from Harvard. His undergraduate thesis on the
search for political truth became a best- selling book, Inquest: The
Warren Commission and the Establishment of Truth. His doctoral
dissertation on television news was excerpted in The New Yorker
and published as News from Nowhere. After teaching political science
at MIT and UCLA, he became a full- time author. He won the
prestigious Financial Times/Booz Allen & Hamilton Global Business
Book Award for both best biography and best business book
for Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer. He has written
investigative pieces for The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, The Atlantic,
and The New York Review of Books. He lives in New York City.
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 353
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 354
9/30/16 8:13 AM
a note on the type
The text of this book was set in a typeface called Aldus, designed by
the celebrated typographer Hermann Zapf in 1952– 53. Based on
the classical proportion of the popular Palatino type family, Aldus
was originally adapted for Linotype composition as a slightly
lighter version that would read better in smaller sizes.
Hermann Zapf was born in Nuremberg, Germany, in 1918. He
has created many other well known typefaces including Comenius,
Hunt Roman, Marconi, Melior, Michelangelo, Optima, Saphir, Sistina,
Zapf Book and Zapf Chancery.
Composed by North Market Street Graphics, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Printed and bound by Berryville Graphics, Berryville, Virginia
Designed by Maggie Hinders
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 355
9/30/16 8:13 AM
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 356
9/30/16 8:13 AM
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029535.txt,"On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

as chairman of the council of europe , he is really mr human rights, Im sure that if he can be of help, he will

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:27 AM, i vr otc:

| remember meeting Jagland at your place when | came with Sultan.

Sent from Windows Mail

From: Jeffrey Epstein

Sent: 18 January, 2013 2:40 AM
To: Mohamed Waheed Hassan
Subject: Re:

also be advised that thorbjorn jagland is a great friend.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Mohamed Waheed Hassan rote:
Hi,
Would be great if Lisa could visit us. She sounds like the right person to help us get organized.

Maldives just got elected Vice President of International Renewable Energy Agency. We are also Vice Chair
of the UN Human Rights Council. Not too bad considering we had so much bad coverage this year
internationally.

Best regards,

Waheed

Sent from President's iPad

On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

my friend in sweden, lisa svensson, would be perfect as your right hand orgainzing your team,, she has
diplomaitc experieince and is currently amabssador to the oceans for sweden

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Mohammed Waheed Hassan i rote:
Hi,
The campaign team is starting to come together. We are continuing discussions with Jim and tomorrow
we will meet him face to face on skype. We will brief him on the situation here so that he will be able to

advice us more effectively. Already he has sent some very useful suggestions and we are working on them.

Getting the right people to head various aspects on the campaign is difficult here but we should be able to
pull the team together shortly.

We will need some more help from lan and Rory because we are still weak on international

communication. Some old negative stuff keeps coming up in the Guardian newspaper in England. But most
of the international media is not paying much attention to Maldives right now.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029535
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030064.txt,"Article 2.

Project Syndicate

Democracy’s Dawn in Tunisia and
Egypt?

Alfred Stepan

2011-05-12 -- CAIRO — With protests fading in Tunis and seeming
to have peaked in Cairo, it is time to ask whether Tunisia and Egypt
will complete democratic transitions. I have been visiting both
countries, where many democratic activists have been comparing
their situation with the more than 20 successful and failed democratic-
transition attempts throughout the world that I have observed and
analyzed.

One fear should be dismissed immediately: despite worries about the
incompatibility of Islam and democracy, more than 500 million
Muslims now live in Muslim-majority countries that are commonly
classified as democracies — Indonesia, Turkey, Bangladesh, Senegal,
Mali, and Albania. But, for almost 40 years, not a single Arab-
majority country has been classified as a democracy, so a democratic
transition in either Tunisia or Egypt (or elsewhere in the region)
would be of immense importance for the entire Arab world.
Tunisia’s chances of becoming a democracy before the year ends are,
I believe, surprisingly good. A key factor here is that the military is
not complicating the transition to democracy. Tunisia has a small
military (only about 36,000 soldiers), and, since independence in
1956, it had been led by two party-based non-democratic leaders who
strove to keep the military out of politics.

Moreover, the current civilian-led interim government engages in at
least some negotiations about the new democratic rules of the game

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030064
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016284.txt,"processing performed by elementary particles moving around, and there’s no law of
physics that says one can’t build machines more intelligent in every way than we are, and
able to seed cosmic life. This suggests that we’ve seen just the tip of the intelligence
iceberg; there’s an amazing potential to unlock the full intelligence latent in nature and
use it to help humanity flourish—or flounder.

Others, including some of the authors in this volume, dismiss the building of an
AGI (Artificial General Intelligence—an entity able to accomplish any cognitive task at
least as well as humans) not because they consider it physically impossible but because
they deem it too difficult for humans to pull off in less than a century. Among
professional AI researchers, both types of dismissal have become minority views because
of recent breakthroughs. There is a strong expectation that AGI will be achieved within a
century, and the median forecast is only decades away. A recent survey of AI researchers
by Vincent Muller and Nick Bostrom concludes:

[T]he results reveal a view among experts that AI systems will probably (over
50%) reach overall human ability by 2040-50, and very likely (with 90%
probability) by 2075. From reaching human ability, it will move on to
superintelligence in 2 years (10%) to 30 years (75%) thereafter. '°

In the cosmic perspective of gigayears, it makes little difference whether AGI
arrives in thirty or three hundred years, so let’s focus on the implications rather than the
timing.

First, we humans discovered how to replicate some natural processes with
machines, making our own heat, light, and mechanical horsepower. Gradually we
realized that our bodies were also machines, and the discovery of nerve cells blurred the
boundary between body and mind. Finally, we started building machines that could
outperform not only our muscles but our minds as well. We’ve now been eclipsed by
machines in the performance of many narrow cognitive tasks, ranging from memorization
and arithmetic to game play, and we are in the process of being overtaken in many more,
from driving to investing to medical diagnosing. If the AI community succeeds in its
original goal of building AGI, then we will have, by definition, been eclipsed at all
cognitive tasks.

This begs many obvious questions. For example, will whoever or whatever
controls the AGI control Earth? Should we aim to control superintelligent machines? If
not, can we ensure that they understand, adopt, and retain human values? As Norbert
Wiener put it in Zhe Human Use of Human Beings:

Woe to us if we let [the machine] decide our conduct, unless we have previously
examined the laws of its action, and know fully that its conduct will be carried
out on principles acceptable to us! On the other hand, the machine . .. , which
can learn and can make decisions on the basis of its learning, will in no way be
obliged to make such decisions as we should have made, or will be acceptable to
us.

16 Vincent C. Miller & Nick Bostrom, “Future Progress in Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Expert
Opinion,” in Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence, Vincent C. Muller, ed. (Springer International
Publishing Switzerland, 2016), pp. 555-72. https://nickbostrom.com/papers/survey .pdf.

64

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016284
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020179.txt,"Zul

would not be on Snowden’s side of the divide (and the Snowden breach ended the career of many
of them, including General Alexander.)

But political leaders in both parties could also be found on the anti-Snowden side of the divide.
“T don’t look at this as being a whistle-blower.” Senator Dianne Feinstein (D. - Calif.), the head
of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said after she was briefed on Snowden's theft of documents.
""I think it’s an act of treason."" Rep. Mike Rogers, (R.-Mich.), her counterpart on the House
Intelligence Committee, said on the NBC program, “Meet the Press,” that Snowden might be
working for a foreign intelligence service. And a former prominent member of President Obama's
cabinet went even further, suggesting to me off the record in March this year that there are only
three possible explanations for the Snowden heist: 1) It was a Russian espionage operation; 2) It
was a Chinese espionage operation, or 3) It was a joint Sino-Russian operation. These severe
accusations generated much heat but little light. They were not accompanied by any evidence
from these Congressional leaders showing that Snowden had acted in concert with any foreign
power in stealing the files or, for that matter, that he was not acting out of his own personal
convictions, not matter how misguided they may have been.

On this side of the divide, Snowden's critics regard the whistle blowing narrative as at best
incomplete, and at worst fodder for the naive. They point out that the FISA document that gave
him credentials as a whistle-blower was only issued in the last week of April 2013, which was
three months after he first contacted Greenwald and almost 9 months after he began illegally
copying secret documents. They further believe that the evidence contradicts Snowden’s claims
that he stole only documents that exposed NSA transgression into domestic surveillance, that he
turned over all the stolen documents to journalists, and that he was forced to remain in Moscow
by the actions of the US government. They believe that all three of these claims, which are at the
conceptual basis of the whistle blowing story, are false. They also find that the unprecedented
size and complexity of the penetration of NSA files, compromising hundreds of thousands of
secret documents pertaining to US operations against adversary nations, according to the NSA’s
and Pentagon estimates, does not afford an innocent explanation for the volume of files he took.

The deep split in how Snowden is perceived brings to mind the famous drawing of a duck

-rabbit cartoon first published in 1900 in the book Fact and Fable in Psychology. The figure is
perceived either as a duck or as a rabbit but it cannot be seen as both simultaneously. Whether a
person sees a rabbit or duck in this test may depend on the information available to that person.
For example, if the person has never seen an image of a rabbit before, he will see almost certainly
see a duck; and vice versa.

Similarly, what may account for the sharp divide between the Snowden and anti-Snowden
camps is a disparity in the available information. The pro-Snowden camp's view is largely
informed by Snowden himself. It prefers to believe his words over his actions.

In the anti-Snowden camp are administration officials and the members of the House and Senate
intelligence oversight committees who have been at least partially briefed on the continuing
investigations of the Snowden affair. The members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, for
example, were briefed by David Leatherwood, the director of operations of the Defense

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020179
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019920.txt,"into a national joke, which he seemed destined to never recover from. To boot, the
president blamed Spicer for not making the million phantom souls seem real.

It was the first presidential instance of what the campaign regulars had learned over
many months: on the most basic level, Trump just did not, as Spicer later put it, give a
fuck. You could tell him whatever you wanted, but he knew what he knew, and if what
you said contradicted what he knew, he simply didn’t believe you.

The next day Kellyanne Conway, her aggressive posture during the campaign turning
more and more to petulance and self-pity, asserted the new president’s right to claim
“alternative facts.” As it happened, Conway meant to say “alternative information,” which
at least would imply there might be additional data. But as uttered, it certainly sounded
like the new administration was claiming the right to recast reality. Which, in a sense, it
was. Although, in Conway’s view, it was the media doing the recasting, making a
mountain (hence “fake news”) out of a molehill (an honest minor exaggeration, albeit of
vast proportions).

Anyway, the frequently asked question about whether Trump would continue his
unsupervised and often inexplicable tweets now that he was officially in the White House
and the president of the United States—a question as hotly asked inside the White House
as out—was answered: he would.

This was his fundamental innovation in governing: regular, uncontrolled bursts of
anger and spleen.

7 OK Ok

The president’s immediate official business, however, was to make nice with the CIA.

On Saturday, January 21, in an event organized by Kushner, the president, in his first
presidential act, paid a call on Langley to, in Bannon’s hopeful description, “play some
politics.” In carefully prepared remarks in his first act as president, he would lay some of
the famous Trump flattery on the CIA and the rest of the sprawling, and leaking, U.S.
intelligence world.

Not taking off his dark overcoat, lending him quite a hulking gangster look, pacing in
front of the CIA’s wall of stars for its fallen agents, in front of a crowd of about three
hundred agency personnel and a group of White House staffers, and, suddenly, in a mood
of sleepless cockiness and pleasure at having a captive crowd, the new president,
disregarding his text, launched into what we could confidently call some of the most
peculiar remarks ever delivered by an American president.

“IT know a lot about West Point, ’'m a person who very strongly believes in academics.
Every time I say I had an uncle who was a great professor at MIT for 35 years, who did a
fantastic job in so many ways academically—he was an academic genius—and then they
say, Is Donald Trump an intellectual? Trust me, I’m like a smart person.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019920
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029253.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 12/8/2015 5:59:54 PM

To: soon yi previn a |
Subject: Re: following up: WA poetry release

thx

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, soon yi previn (> wrote:
Open in principle depending on specially how and where it would be shown and how it would be advertised-
both subject to particular requirements and/or restrictions.Also dependent on approval of final cut. Would enter
project with positive attitude but release would be reworked by lawyer.

Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone @

On Dec 8, 2015, at 10:40 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

a Forwarded message ----------

From: Leah Reis-Dennis iii iii

Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM
Subject: following up: WA poetry release

To: jeevacation@gmail.com, Lisa New <a

Dear Jeffrey,

My name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video
Education. She's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen.

First, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of
years ago on ""This is Just to Say"" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but

we would love the opportunity to turn it into something great.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/c0bn1jjxeo0654g/uWZ6KBVDbLS?preview=WoodyAllen+Basic+Clip+for+Viewing.mov

If Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed
conversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including:

Bill Clinton

Al Gore

John McCain

Mayor Rahm Emanuel

Mayor Tom Menino

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan

Sir Mervyn King

Former Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers

The conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has under
way to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United
States and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television
series we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029253
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014493.txt,"Chart 76: A stronger dollar benefits agencies with global exposure

Chart 77: Media now at a small discount to its 10y average vs market

0.9 105 1.30
0.85 100 1.25
08 95 1.20
0.75 90 18
07 85 10
1.05
0.65 80 4.00
06 75 0.95

———Media 12m fwd PE relative
M88 —— Stoxx Media price relative me sia
0.5 ——DXy Cumey (RHS) 65 0.85
0.45 60 0.80

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Source: Bloomberg

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Bloomberg, Datastream, IBES

Overweight Healthcare

Healthcare looks very attractively valued and we see compelling risk reward in the sector
on an outright basis at current levels. The fundamental bull case for Health rests on the
strong pipeline of new products for the big cap pharma universe. Our sector analysts
forecast EU Pharma to deliver a 2018-21E EPS CAGR of 11%, up from mid-single digit
levels in recent years. Historically that would justify a PE re-rating and a multiple for the
pharma sub-sector nearer 17-18x than the current 13x 2018 PE.

We believe the Republican clean sweep in the US elections represents a positive
catalyst as it significantly decreases the potential for legislative initiatives to
aggressively control drug pricing in the US. The catalyst for the sector to re-rate will
come progressively from newsflow around new products. The next 12 months should
see progress on this front with several of the European large caps expected to announce
key data on important drugs in 2017.

Chart 79: Healthcare PE relative back near market multiple and lowest

since 2011 when patent cliff was at its worst

Chart 78: Pharma’s improving growth outlook not reflected in PE

3 Year Sales, EBIT and EPS CAGR Majors and 12 month forward PE ratio

15% 20 1.70
——HealthCare 12m fwd PE relative
sc 8 1.60
6 1.50
5%
4 1.40
0% 2 1.30
. 1.20
-5%
1.10
-10% 6 1.00
t= tft tft et tft tt tw Ye Yee wa ww :
Bee woe SHE AHeH HSH 0.90
mame 3yr Sales CAGR mam 3yr EBIT CAGR 0.80
mmm 3yr EPS CAGR 12 month forward PE (rhs) 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Datastream, IBES, Bloomberg
Healthcare’s forward PE is now down to just a 7% premium relative to the market and
nearing the valuation lows recorded in 2010-12 when the patent cliff was at its worst
and pipelines were very weak. Today pipelines are twice the size they were in 2011 and
innovation is the key to growth in the sector - pricing power remains strong in drug
categories with differentiated products. The new product launches expected between
2015 and 2018 add up to potential sales of $133 billion.
34 European Equity Strategy | 01 December 2016 orate 2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014493
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031055.txt,"Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/24/18 07:10:57 AM (556812657)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: BOB6F154-Ac50-4474-8F7D-8758AB043D84

Message: Night

Sender: Po

Time: 08/24/18 07:11:09 AM (556812669)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

#]

GUID: E2EF6DD9-5A61-41AE-9871-6D5EBA784877

Message: When are you back

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/24/18 07:11:20 AM (556812680)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7316014C-43DB-42C2-9780-A9A2F8D17164

Message: 15th

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/24/18 07:11:26 AM (556812686)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7BC8110B-4F05-4BED-A9D9-035C64D48D93

Message: U?

Sender: Po

Time: 08/24/18 07:13:18 AM (556812798)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: BD94BB2E-E387-4D60-9B65-F6F65A75656A

Message: I am around

Sender: i’

Time: 08/24/18 07:13:29 AM (556812809)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031055
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015955.txt,"Software 265

|WHATIPE ROSS DOESN'T KNOW || HAHA, ART? COME ON! LIKE
ANYTHING ABOUT IT WOULD BE THAT DIFFICULT
PROGRAMMING! HE WOULD BE TO TYPE ON A KEYBOARD ALL
USELESS AND NOTHING BUT A || DAY! MY SON |S TEN AND HE
BURDEN! MY PROJECT IS DOES IT TOO!
STATE OF THE ART AND I'M
GONNA LET NO VIGUAL BASIC
PROGRAMMERS NEAR |[T!

they implement it mechanically. You see, of course, the problem. It
will be riddled with bugs because they have missed the creative step of
imagining the whole problem and solving it in the round.

This fundamental misconception of software is common in many
organizations. “Ah,” says the finance director, “I'll write a very detailed
spec and then we can get someone cheap to just program it.” This does
not work. If the finance director has done the creative work of taking a
problem and turning it into a detailed specification for the programmer
to ‘just program’ — removing any ambiguity and therefore the creative
overhead - he will have all but written software himself, albeit in
a computer language of his own making. On the other hand, if the
specification is a linear list of issues with no creative thought, he will not
have reduced the time needed to program. He may have improved the
quality by effectively getting a second pair of eyes onto the requirements
gathering stage, but this does not help the programming effort itself.

Ideally, you should never split up specification and coding. It is a
creative process best handled by very small numbers of people working
intensively on it. Of course, there is one big problem with this: some
software tasks are huge. Before we look at the science of splitting up a
software project, it is worth pointing out that many of the most famous
projects were written by one man. I have met many of these people and
they are all exceptional - Linus Torvalds, Linux; Anthony Minessale,
FreeSWITCH; Daniel-Constantin Mierla, Kamailio; Eric Allman,
ssendMail. Before splitting a project between many people, it is worth
considering whether you can give it to just one individual. To do this you

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015955
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023281.txt,"ex[penses. personal review? , trying to create accurate ledgers of capital expenses . so to minimize future
gain.? 3. phaidon - review from head to toe? though we agreed many times in the past this was not my
responsbility, 4. overseeing the opening of trading accts. proposed and sent over first docs in april of
14. .5. art partnership.? we agreed though the draft was sent in septl4 . and still not done though
little different from first draft. .6 picasso contract? 7 art sale 1031 8 airplane review? 9. IT system
implementation. ? tra brh sec gaming comm, foerign filing , tax, disclosure. fondation returns. ?
planning for 16? notsure . 10. insurane review with josh? stock sale prep. ? filing ?

I am available by phone. you mentioned my travel schedule ----last yea,r I canceled three European trips
and two to seatle , none to my benefit.

I have been consistant , I dont have any new proposal , do you? though i am"" complicated"" , I have no
intention of trying to convince you of value, its silly ,

OOOOOOOOOOOOO00000 i think if I have correctly deciphered your sophisticated code -
should represent -drool

Date: Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:18 AM
Subject: Fwd:

To: Melanie Spinella
lets set a time to speak today if possible . 30 minutes or so. my schedule is tight

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:36 PM
Subject: agenda for today 5 pm?
To: Melanie Spinella < , Brad S Karp <Q

1. put someone on asap to ascertain if she is still in london. 2. set up conference will uk criminal and uk
counsel. a give them more facts. 3. choose method of message delivery. my choice. - two highly
respected former ---- fillin the blank, immigration, scotland yard. sfo. . who may knock on her door
and present the terms. 4 if not. an alternative method. 5. Is it possible to find out if she has gone to
authorities? tabloid lawyer. 6. have the same types of individuals availble in new york if she decides to
return as stated... 1 prefer former fbi, or immigration one man one woman. .7 from opening a DA
investigation to arrest. how long? 8, can we open a file in either jurisdiction, and maintain
confidentiality.

Date: Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:48 PM

Subject: Re: agenda for today 5 pm?

To: Melanie Spinella

I think that Melanie should set up a separate email account for this correspondence. she currently is on
an apollo server.

There is not even a good solution . all have substantial risks. we are dealing with a wholly unpredictable
and bad minded person. I and Brad can only make suggestions/actions each less than stellar. - that being
said we should do our best to have all the facts . options etc. and to distinguish fact from opionion As
the consequences of any decision is likely to have some very bad parts , Leon needs to be cognizant of as
much as the downside as we can adequately foresee.

Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:07 AM
Subject: Fwd:

To: Melanie Spinella

jan 2 of this year
Date: Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023281
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020151.txt,"¢ Nicholas Leiby has joined Weinberg Capital Group as director. He was
previously vice president at Resilience Capital Partners. www.weinbergcap.com

en eee De ere

HESS | HESS GES) ES

Final Numbers

FA eee tdi na pera

Reproduced from BP Energy Outlook 2018; Chart: Axios Visuals

a a ae ae en

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020151
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012483.txt,"a, ‘.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

—_

oo 0 Oo NY ODO oO eB Ww

> Oo > o>

~0929104. TXT
| don't know how to --

Have you spoken to her about this case?
No.
Who's Vince?

My sister's friend. | don't really speak

to him at all.

case?

What's his last name?

103

And have you spoken to Vince about this

No, sir.

Have you spoken to a about this case?
Not in detail, but yes.

MS. BELOHLAVEK: Are we referring to

BY MR. TEIN:

ca)

SP > P+ o> DO >

THE WITNESS: Yes.
MR. TEIN: Yes.
MS. BELOHLAVEK: Okay.

Have you spoken to Justin about this case?
Justin?

Do you have a friend named Justin?

| do not have a friend named Justin.

From freshman year?

No.

How about |g

No.

Have you spoken to || about this case?
Page 88

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012483
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

29
H3VOGIU1

she is noncompliant with her taxes. Defendant's purported
expert's evaluation of this is wholly flawed, as explained in
Ms. Giuffre's motion in limine on the same.

Similarly, Ms. Giuffre's taxes are wholly irrelevant

to this case. Even actions brought by the government, your

Honor, where the cause of action is centered on nontax

complianc xclud vidence of prior tax noncompliance when it

takes the case too far afield of the issue being tried.

Courts also exclude this evidence under 403 if there's

no substantial nexus between the alleged tax noncompliance and

the matter at hand. Here, defendant fails to show any type of

substantial nexus to this defamation claim. None whatsoever.
Additionally, resolving Ms. Giuffre's tax compliance,
this is a point that's in dispute among the parties, and

resolving such an issue would also involve another mini trial

where Ms. Giuffre would put on evidence of her tax compliance
and, at the end of that mini trial, the jury would have no more
information whether or not defendant defamed Ms. Giuffre when
she called her a liar about being sexually abused. Trying to
make this an issue, this is simply a device for putting the

settlement agreement and the amount between Ms. Giuffre and

Jeffrey Epstein into evidence.

As has been briefed extensively, such a settlement

payment is tax exempt under the United States law, but that's

all this is, it's a device to try to get an improper admission

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019908.txt,"partly a paranoia about email, but even more a controlling crypticness. He kept assistants
and minders at constant bay. You couldn’t really make an appointment with Bannon, you
just had to show up. And somehow, his own key lieutenant, Alexandra Preate, a
conservative fundraiser and PR woman, was as disorganized as he was. After three
marriages, Bannon lived his bachelor’s life on Capitol Hill in a row house known as the
Breitbart Embassy that doubled as the Breitbart office—the life of a messy party. No sane
person would hire Steven Bannon for a job that included making the trains run on time.

OOK Ok

Hence, Reince Priebus.

For the Hill, he was the only reasonable chief among the contenders, and he quickly
became the subject of intense lobbying by House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority
Leader Mitch McConnell. If they were going to have to deal with an alien like Donald
Trump, then best they do it with the help of a member of their own kind.

Priebus, forty-five, was neither politician nor policy wonk nor strategist. He was
political machine worker, one of the oldest professions. A fundraiser.

A working-class kid originally from New Jersey and then Wisconsin, at thirty-two he
made his first and last run for elective office: a failed bid for Wisconsin state senate. He
became the chairman of the state party and then the general counsel of the Republican
National Committee. In 2011 he stepped up to chairmanship of the RNC. Priebus’s
political cred came from appeasing the Tea Party in Wisconsin, and his association with
Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, a rising Republican star (and, briefly—very briefly—
the 2016 front-runner).

With significant parts of the Republican Party inalterably opposed to Trump, and with
an almost universal belief within the party that Trump would go down to ignominious
defeat, taking the party with him, Priebus was under great pressure after Trump captured
the nomination to shift resources down the ticket and even to abandon the Trump
campaign entirely.

Convinced himself that Trump was hopeless, Priebus nevertheless hedged his bets. The
fact that he did not abandon Trump entirely became a possible margin of victory and made
Priebus something of a hero (equally, in the Kellyanne Conway version, if they had lost,
he would have been a reasonable target). He became the default choice for chief.

And yet his entry into the Trump inner circle caused Priebus his share of uncertainty
and bewilderment. He came out of his first long meeting with Trump thinking it had been
a disconcertingly weird experience. Trump talked nonstop and constantly repeated
himself.

“Here’s the deal,” a close Trump associate told Priebus. “In an hour meeting with him
you're going to hear fifty-four minutes of stories and they’re going to be the same stories

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019908
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013945.txt,"immediate negative effect it would have on the company and
what could you do to prevent or minimize it?
Put yourself in your boss’s shoes. Based on your work history, would you trust yourself to
work outside of the office?
If you wouldn’t, reread Elimination to improve production and consider the hourglass option.
Practice environment-free productivity.

Attempt to work for two to three hours in a café for two Saturdays prior to proposing a remote
trial. If you exercise in a gym, attempt to exercise for those two weeks at home or otherwise
outside of the gym environment. The purpose here is to separate your activities from a single
environment and ensure that you have the discipline to work solo.

Quantify current productivity.
If you have applied the 80/20 Principle, set the rules of interrupting interruption, and completed
related groundwork, your performance should be at an all-time high in quantifiable terms, whether

customers served, revenue generated, pages produced, speed of accounts receivable, or otherwise.
Document this.

Create an opportunity to demonstrate remote work productivity before asking for it as a
policy.

This is to test your ability to work outside of an office environment and rack up some proof that
you can kick ass without constant supervision.

Practice the art of getting past “no” before proposing.

Go to farmers’ markets to negotiate prices, ask for free first-class upgrades, ask for compensation
if you encounter poor service in restaurants, and otherwise ask for the world and practice using the
following magic questions when people refuse to give it to you.

“What would I need to do to [desired outcome]|?”

“Under what circumstances would you [desired outcome]?”

“Have you ever made an exception?”

“T’m sure you’ve made an exception before, haven’t you?”

(if no for either of the last two, ask, “Why not?” If yes, ask, “Why ?’”)

Put your employer on remote training wheels— propose Monday or Friday at home.

Consider doing this, or the following step, during a period when it would be too disruptive to fire
you, even if you were marginally less productive while remote.

If your employer refuses, it’s time to get a new boss or become an entrepreneur. The job will
never give you the requisite time freedom. If you decide to jump ship, consider letting them make
you walk the plank—quitting is often less appealing than tactfully getting fired and using
severance or unemployment to take a long vacation.

Extend each successful trial period until you reach full-time or your desired level of mobility.

Don’t underestimate how much your company needs you. Perform well and ask for what you want.
If you don’t get it over time, leave. It’s too big a world to spend most of life in a cubicle.

» LIFESTYLE DESIGN IN ACTION

Consider trying Earth Class Mail, a service that you can reroute all your mail to, at which point they

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013945
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032304.txt,"From: Darren lndyke 
Sent: 10/8/2016 10:48:32 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Importance: High 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Miller, Michael"" < 
Date: October 8, 2016 at 4:52:27 PM EDT 
To: ""Darren Indyke_________________________________________ 
Cc: ""Weingarten, Reid"" < 
Subject: FW: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Privileged - Redacted 
Michael C. Miller 
Partner 
www.steptoe.com/mmiller 
Steptoe 
direct Steptoe & Johnson LLP 
fax 1114 Avenue of the Americas 
cell New York, NY 10036 
www.steptoe.com  
This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. 
From: Palazzolo, Joseph 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 4:49 PM 
To: Miller, Michael 
Subject: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Hi, Michael. 
I'm writing about the Jane Doe case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Can I talk to you briefly? Story is likely going 
online in the next couple hours. Apologies for the short notice. I wanted to get a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein. 
Thanks and best, 
Joe 
Joe Palazzolo 
Staff reporter 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032304 
1211 Avenue of the Americas 
New York, NY 10036 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032305 
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028096.txt,"perfectly. No missiles would actually be shot. This stage was for the telemetry.
Once that was done, the soldier-actors would be replaced with wooden targets
and the real munitions would be tested.

The young soldiers stated chatting to one another, and milling about,
simulating as best we could the circumstances in which we expected to target
Saddam if the operation got final approval. In theory, within a minute, two
minutes at most, we would get word that the preliminary mock-firing sequence
had gone perfectly — at which point the artillery-range targets would be brought
in for the live test. But suddenly, there was an explosion. A split second of
silence. Then pandemonium. There was no need to know, and no time to
wonder, what exactly had gone wrong, or how it had been allowed to happen. It
was obvious to all of us that the /ive missiles had been fired. We sprinted
forward. When we got to the group of soldiers, we could see that four of the
young men were dead. Another was fighting for his life. Several others were
also wounded.

A sayeret medic and several senior officers were trying to save the most
badly injured man, but I knew I needed to get military doctors and medical
evacuation helicopters in immediately if we were to save the lives of the injured
soldiers. I had a mobile phone, but couldn’t get a signal. I ran toward a slightly
higher area a few dozen yards away and managed to get through to the kirya. I
issued orders for the nearby training base in Tze’elim and an air force near
Beersheva to dispatch helicopters to treat and evacuate the wounded.

We heard the first chopper about 25 minutes later, but it seemed initially
unable to see us, because it flew on before returning and landing two minutes
later. By that time, a medical team from the base in Tze’ elim had arrived. Ten
minutes later, two other medevac choppers landed. But the soldier who had
been worst wounded could not be saved. After the doctors had been there about
20 minutes, I again retreated to the area where I could get a mobile signal, and
phoned Rabin to tell him what had happened. We agreed I should come back to
brief him in detail. It was now about 50 minutes since the missiles had hit. The
wounded were all being treated. One of the helicopters had taken off for
Beersheva Hospital. Another two, including a heavier Sikorsky transport
helicopter, were preparing to leave. I arranged for Amnon, military intelligence
chief Shmuel Arad and me to return to the kirya. I told Amiram to stay until he
had confirmed all the injured had been evacuated, and talk to everyone involved
to get a preliminary idea of why and how the tragedy had happened.

248
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028096
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032914.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 11/11/2016 5:19:42 AM
To: Jabor Y.
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

When marrahesh ? Is it definite

On Friday, 11 November 2016, Jabor Y. = ti iststi‘éz@ wrote:

Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties
and meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with
the Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you in

Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out.

On Thursday, November 10, 2016, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032914
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018087.txt,"3

failure. Sectarian tensions were the key to the trouble in Bahrain,
where a Sunni monarchy rules over a restive Shia majority.

Islamists, the bogeymen of the west and the enemies of all autocratic
Arab regimes, have not - yet - played a significant role. Still, Ennahda
in Tunisia and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt have new
opportunities in multi-party systems that will in turn change them.
The killing of Osama bin Laden was a timely reminder of the defeat
of jihadi ideology in an Arab world being transformed by people
power.

Another variable has been the response: French support for Ben Ali
was embarrassing; the US was praising Mubarak days before he
departed. Muammar Gaddafi had no friends - and the Arab League
was crucial in providing a figleaf for UN-sanctioned Nato
intervention. Bashar al-Assad, by contrast, has yet to be condemned
by the UN for a crackdown that has cost at least 1,300 lives. Bahrain
is too strategically important to face more than a rebuke from the US.
Elsewhere in the region, Israel is nervous about the demise of
Mubarak. Turkey fears instability in Syria. The Palestinians, eclipsed
by drama elsewhere, are trying to learn lessons. Iran's support for the
Arab uprisings is sheer hypocrisy given its crushing of democratic
protests since 2009.

Now the EU and the US must stop being seen by Arabs as ""partners
for dictators"" in the words of the Tunisian academic Ahmed Driss.
Billions of dollars will be needed to support democracy and
development.

Tunisia and Egypt fear instability as they face free elections. But the
really hard transformational work, as the respected commentator
Rami Khouri has observed, ""will start in the years after the new
parliaments are elected and the complete infrastructure of political
governance is forged according to the will of the majority"".

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018087
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022809.txt,"Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

http:
x.html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by

return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/inde

http: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index

.html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022809
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016914.txt,"the future cannot be the same as the past. The universe could even be careening toward a
“heat death,” some far-off time when the total stock of energy had uniformly dispersed,
achieving a state of maximum entropy, after which no further change could occur.

If information gua entropy could not be conserved, then Wiener concluded it was
folly for military leaders to try to stockpile the “scientific know-how of the nation in
static libraries and laboratories.” Indeed, “no amount of scientific research, carefully
recorded in books and papers, and then put into our libraries with labels of secrecy, will
be adequate to protect us for any length of time in a world where the effective level of
information is perpetually advancing.” Any such efforts at secrecy, classification, or the
containment of information would fail, Wiener argued, just as surely as hucksters’
schemes for perpetual-motion machines faltered in the face of the second law of
thermodynamics.

Wiener criticized the American “orthodoxy” of free-market fundamentalism in
much the same way. For most Americans, “questions of information will be evaluated
according to a standard American criterion: a thing is valuable as a commodity for what it
will bring in the open market.” Indeed, “the fate of information in the typically American
world is to become something which can be bought or sold;” most people, he observed,
“cannot conceive of a piece of information without an owner.” Wiener considered this
view to be as wrong-headed as rampant military classification. Again he invoked
Shannon’s insight: Since “information and entropy are not conserved,” they are “equally
unsuited to being commodities.”

Information cannot be conserved—so far, so good. But did Wiener really have
Shannon’s “information” in mind? The crux of Shannon’s argument, as Weaver had
emphasized, was to distinguish a colloquial sense of “information,” as message with
meaning, from an abstracted, rarefied notion of strings of symbols arrayed with some
probability and selected from an enormous universe of gibberish. For Shannon,
“information” could be quantified because its fundamental unit, the bit, was a unit of
conveyance rather than understanding.

When Wiener characterized “information” throughout Human Use, on the other
hand, he tilted time and again to a classical, humanistic sense of the term. “A piece of
information,” he wrote—tellingly, not a “bit” of information—“in order to contribute to
the general information of the community, must say something substantially different
from the community’s previous common stock of information.” This was why
“schoolboys do not like Shakespeare,” he concluded: The Bard’s couplets may depart
starkly from random bitstreams, but they had nonetheless become all too familiar to the
sense-making public and “absorbed into the superficial clichés of the time.”

At least the information content of Shakespeare had once seemed fresh. During
the postwar boom years, Wiener fretted, the “enormous per capita bulk of
communication”—ranging across newspapers and movies to radio, television, and
books—had bred mediocrity, an informational reversion to the mean. “More and more
we must accept a standardized inoffensive and insignificant product which, like the white
bread of the bakeries, is made rather for its keeping and selling properties than for its
food value.” “Heaven save us,” he pleaded, “from the first novels which are written
because a young man desires the prestige of being a novelist rather than because he has

111

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016914
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021949.txt,"Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =|

NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S|
non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO —

126

A. I'm not certain.
Q. Do you -- can you give any estimate at all?
A. You know, in this case, I've probably seen

reference to another in Florida, you know, maybe another
four or five academics that had some kind of interaction
with Epstein.

Q. And you are aware that Epstein was so closely
associated with Harvard, that he had his own office
there?

A. No, I didn't know that Mr. Epstein had an
office at Harvard.

Q. Did you know that Mr. Epstein regularly had
dinners and other social events in which there were
scores of distinguished academicians?

A. Are we talking about Florida or New York?

Q. Generally.

A. Yeah, I knew there was some events like that
in New York. I don't recall having specific information
about an event like that in -- in Palm Beach.

MR. SCAROLA: Richard, let me just make note
of the fact that it's almost 4:30, and by
agreement, we are going stop at 4:30, so if
there's something really pressing you want to get
in this afternoon, this would be a good time to
do that.

ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021949

"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026905.txt,"Source: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.

Of course, none of the supportive factors discussed above precludes further bouts of equity volatility.
As we highlighted at the beginning of the year, the historical probability of a 5% or greater correction
from current valuation levels was 96%. Yet these statistics alone do not justify underweighting
equities, since such pullbacks often occur after sizable equity rallies, as this year reminds us.

Moreover, such pullbacks are quite normal historically. After all, stocks have suffered a median of two
pullbacks of at least 5% and one of at least 10% per calendar year in the post-WWII period, leaving
both the frequency and magnitude of this year’s dips in line with past experience. Most importantly,
years that experienced a similar number of pullbacks as 2018 nonetheless ended with a median gain
of 6% and had 77% odds of a positive return.

Conclusion

Although we have painted a less alarmist view of recent market weakness, we are by no means
Pollyannaish. While bull markets do not die of old age, they do become more susceptible to ailments
over time. Yet as we survey the tug of war between the steady factors and the unsteady undertow,
we do not think the balance of risks is strong enough to topple the ongoing US expansion and the
continued growth of corporate earnings it supports.

That said, this viewpoint does not preclude further market volatility and the market may still make new
lows if the current downdraft persists. But history suggests the bull market is likely to continue until
about 5-6 months prior to the end of this economic expansion. Thus, it will take a significant increase
in the odds of an imminent recession to provide the trigger—that has been lacking thus far—to
tactically underweight equities. In the interim, we continue to recommend that clients maintain their
strategic allocation to US equities.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026905
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024583.txt,"Jeffrey Safchik, Chief Financial Officer

Jeffrey Safchik is the Chief Financial Officer of KUE. Mr. Safchik is also Managing Director and Chief
Financial Officer of Greenstreet Real Estate Partners and also is one of its founders. He serves in a
similar capacity for all the Greenstreet financial companies. Mr. Safchik is also Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of k1Ventures, a publicly traded Singapore-based investment company.
Previously, Mr. Safchik was CFO of a real-estate company that managed more than 11 million square feet
of retail and commercial property across the U.S. He has served as CFO for a billion-dollar retailer,
where he managed the company's financial affairs and was directly involved in its restructuring and
strategic planning. Mr. Safchik graduated from Pace University in New York, received his master's
degree in taxation from St. John’s University, and has attended advanced finance and real estate courses
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and New York University. He serves as a Trustee for the
Green Family Foundation, is Chairman of the University of Miami Department of Pediatrics Children’s
Council and is active in a number of charities including the Marian Center for Under-privileged Children
and the United Way.

Richard Sandler, General Counsel

Richard Sandler is General Counsel for KUE. Mr. Sandler is also Executive Vice President of the Milken
Family Foundation and has been involved with the Foundation since its inception. A shareholder in the
law firm of Maron & Sandler, he has practiced law since 1973, and specializes in real estate transactions
and general securities and business law. He has aiso been involved since 1983 in consulting with
respect to business acquisitions. Mr. Sandler is a member of the State Bar of California and has served
on various boards of educational and philanthropic institutions, including the Executive Board of Heal
L.A., as a Trustee of Brentwood Schcol, and on the Board of the Foundations of the Milken Families. Mr.
Sandler received a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Berkeley, and his juris doctorate
degree from the UCLA School of Law.

Adam Cohn, Senior Vice President, Business Development

Adam Cohn is Senior Vice President of Business Development at KUE where he is responsible for
investments, financings and business development for Knowledge Universe and its portfolio companies.
Mr. Cohn has been at KUE, or related entities, since March of 2000. He has overseen the acquisitions
and related financings of KinderCare Learning Centers Inc. and Aramark Educational Resources by
Knowledge Learning Corporation. Previously, Mr. Cohn was with Whitney & Co., a leading private equity
firm. Prior to Whitney & Co., Mr. Cohn was an investment banker in the Financial Sponsors Group at
Bankers Trust Company and Deutsche Bank. Mr. Cohn serves on several private and public company
board of directors. Mr. Gohn has a BS in Business from Skidmore College and a MBA from Columbia
University.

Geoffrey Moore, Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications

Geoffrey Moore is Senior Vice President of Communications at KUE. He has also provided
communications counsel to FasterCures, the Milken Institute, the Prostate Cancer Foundation and related
organizations for several years. Prior to joining Knowledge Universe in 1998, Mr. Moore was Senior Vice
President of Strategic Communications for Dow Jones Markets, a unit of Dow Jones, publisher of The
Wall Street Journal. We served for 22 years in a wide range of communications management and
speechwriting positions for IBM in the U.S. and Japan. Earlier, he was an Assistant to New York
Governor Nelson Rockefeller, Press Secretary to U.S. Senate Minority Leader Hugh Scott, and Director of
Public Information for the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. His opinion articles have
been published in The New York Times and other major publications. He graduated with a degree in
political science from the University of Pennsylvania and studied law and public policy at that university's
law school.

Michael Neumann, Vice President, Business Development

Michael Neumann ts a Vice President of Business Development at KUE, where he works on investments,
financings and business development for Knowledge Universe and its portfolio companies. Mr. Neumann
has been at KUE, or related entities, since 2002. He has worked on the acquisitions and related
financings of KinderCare Learning Centers Inc. and Aramark Educational Resources by Knowledge

150

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024583
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025845.txt,"the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025845
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021791.txt,"The slow, dissatisfying resolution of the case sends a message to the public that there's a different system of
justice for the wealthy who hire high-powered lawyers. Epstein's legal team included West Palm Beach defense
attorney Jack Goldberger, Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz, who defended O.J. Simpson
against murder charges, and Kenneth Starr, the prosecutor who pursued then-President Bill Clinton for lying
about sex with young women.

Palm Beach police spent 11 months investigating Epstein before State Attorney Barry Krischer sent the case to
a grand jury, instead of charging Epstein so the man who once boasted of accepting only billionaire clients
could face a trial. The police had taken a high school transcript, class schedules and phone messages from
Epstein's home that showed he knew the girls were underage. Yet Mr. Krischer was more swayed by Epstein's
lawyers, who attempted to impugn the girls' character by showing they had chatted on myspace.com about
smoking marijuana and drinking. He should have let a jury decide whether the victims - and Epstein - were
credible.

Ultimately, one charge against Epstein finally reflected the age of one victim, and the plea agreement left
Epstein labeled a sex offender. With that additional charge, if Epstein had been convicted at a trial, he could
have been sentenced to anything from probation to 15 years in prison, Assistant State Attorney Lanna
Belohlavek said, adding that the recommended guideline sentence was 21 months.

Epstein also won't have to certify to the court that he is receiving counseling, typically required of sex
offenders, because he has a private psychiatrist. But without court supervision, who will ensure Epstein is in
fact being treated?

The plea deal also drops a federal investigation of Epstein. If a federal investigation was warranted, how does
dropping it before completion benefit the public?

Epstein preyed on girls and denied it. For three years, his wealth and the influence of his lawyers bought him
the protection the state attorney owed to the victims.

Police chief's reputation helps discredit attacks

By Larry Keller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Monday, August 14, 2006

In the case of Palm Beach financier Jeffrey Epstein, it seems, at times, as if two men are accused of
wrongdoing: Epstein and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter.

Epstein, 53, was indicted last month on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution solely because of Reiter's
""craziness,"" one of Epstein's lawyers said. His department disseminated ""a distorted view of the case"" and
behaved in a ""childish"" manner when the grand jury didn't indict Epstein on the charges it sought, another
Epstein lawyer complained. To hear the Epstein camp tell it, Reiter, 48, is a loose cannon better suited to be the
sheriff of Mayberry. They whisper that he's embroiled in a messy divorce.

Reiter did in fact file for divorce from his wife, Jill, last year, after 24 years of marriage. They have a son, 18,
and a daughter, 14. The couple is scheduled to go to mediation next week, Aug. 16. Nothing in the court file
suggests their split is particularly ugly.

Reiter incurred the wrath of the Epstein camp as well as the state attorney's office for two reasons. First, he
pressed for Epstein to be charged with the more serious crimes of sexual activity with minors. Second, he
slammed State Attorney Barry Krischer in blunt language seldom used by one law-enforcement official
concerning another because of what he perceived as that office's mishandling of the case.

In a letter to Krischer written May 1, Reiter called his actions in the Epstein case ""highly unusual."" He added,
""I must urge you to... consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the
prosecution of these cases.""

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021791
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298.txt,"Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations

54027

confusion for many employees.
Currently, the language in the notice
tracks statutory language and provides
only the list of employees excluded
from coverage. As a result, those
employees not listed under the
exclusions will reasonably believe they
are covered employees under the
statute. Any employees who are unsure
of their status should contact a regional
office of the NLRB.

The final notice as modified is set
forth in the Appendix to Subpart A of
this rule.

2. Posting Issues

The Board proposed that the notice to
employees shall be at least 11 inches by
17 inches in size, and in such colors and
type size and style as the Board shall
prescribe. The proposed rule further
provides that employers that choose to
print the notice after downloading it
from the Board’s Web site must print in
color, and the printed notice shall be at
least 11 inches by 17 inches in size.

Proposed § 104.202(d) requires all
covered employers to post the employee
notice physically “in conspicuous
places, including all places where
notices to employees are customarily
posted.” Employers must take steps to
ensure that the notice is not altered,
defaced, or covered with other material.
Proposed § 104.202(e) states that the
Board will print the notice poster and
provide copies to employers on request.
It also states that employers may
download copies of the poster from the
Board’s Web site, http://www.nirb.gov,
for their use. It further provides that
employers may reproduce exact
duplicates of the poster supplied by the
Board, and that they may also use
commercial poster services to provide
the employee notice consolidated onto
one poster with other Federally
mandated labor and employment
notices, as long as consolidation does
not alter the size, color, or content of the
poster provided by the Board. Finally,
employers that have significant numbers
of employees who are not proficient in
English will be required to post notices
of employee rights in the language or
languages spoken by significant
numbers of those employees. The Board
will make available posters containing
the necessary translations.

In addition to requiring physical
posting of paper notices, proposed
§ 104.202(f) requires that notices be
distributed electronically, such as by e-
mail, posting on an intranet or an
internet site, and/or other electronic
means, if the employer customarily
communicates with its employees by

such means.' An employer that
customarily posts notices to its
employees on an intranet or internet site
must display the required employee
notice on such a site prominently—i.e.,
no less prominently than other notices
to employees. The Board proposed to
give employers two options to satisfy
this requirement. An employer may
either download the notice itself and
post it in the manner described above,
or post, in the same manner, a link to
the Board’s Web site that contains the
full text of the required employee
notice. In the latter case, the proposed
rule states that the link must contain the
prescribed introductory language from
the poster, which appears in Appendix
to Subpart A, below. An employer that
customarily communicates with its
employees by e-mail will satisfy the
electronic posting requirement by
sending its employees an e-mail
message containing the link described
above.

The proposed rule provides that,
where a Significant number of an
employer’s employees are not proficient
in English, the employer must provide
the required electronic notice in the
language the employees speak. This
requirement can be met either by
downloading and posting, as required in
§ 104.202(f), the translated version of
the notice supplied by the Board, or by
prominently displaying, as required in
§ 104.202(f), a link to the Board’s Web
site that contains the full text of the
poster in the language the employees
speak. The Board will provide
translations of that link. 75 FR 80417.

Section 104.203 of the proposed rule
provides that Federal contractors may
comply with the requirements of the
tule by posting the notices to employees
required under the Department of
Labor’s notice-posting rule, 29 CFR part
471. Id.

The Board solicited comments on its
proposed requirements for both physical
and electronic notice posting. In
addition, the Board solicited comments
on whether it should prescribe
standards regarding the size, clarity,
location, and brightness of the
electronic link, including how to
prescribe electronic postings that are at
least as large, clear, and conspicuous as
the employer’s other postings.

The Board received numerous
comments concerning the technical
requirements for posting the notices of
employee rights. Those comments
address the locations where notices
would be physically posted, physical
characteristics of the posters,

111 See J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9, slip op.
at 6 (2010).

requirements for posting in languages
other than English, details of the
requirement for electronic posting of
notices by employers that customarily
communicate with their employees
electronically, and “safe harbor’
provisions for Federal contractors that
are already posting the Department of
Labor’s notice of NLRA rights.

a. Location of Posting

Section 104.202(d) of the proposed
rule requires that the notice be posted
“in conspicuous places, including all
places where notices to employees are
customarily posted.’ Some employers
and their representatives, including law
firm Baker & McKenzie, comment that
the proposed rule does not define
“customarily.” The Board responds that
the term is used in its normal meaning
of “ordinarily” or “usually,” as it has
been used in the Board’s remedial
orders for decades.112 This standard is
consistent with the posting
requirements in the regulations and
statutes of other agencies.113 Baker &
McKenzie’s comment contends that the
quoted phrase should read instead
“where other legally-required notices to
employees are customarily posted.’’ The
Board disagrees. As under the
Department of Labor’s notice posting
requirement,‘ the Board’s final rule
clarifies that the notice must be posted
wherever notices to employees
regarding personnel rules and policies
are customarily posted and are readily
seen by employees, not simply where
other legally mandated notices are
posted.

A number of comments from
employers 115 and individuals take the
position that it is time to move away
from paper posters and to encourage
employees to inform themselves of their
rights through the Internet. Many
comments object that the posting
requirement will add to already
cluttered bulletin boards or necessitate
additional bulletin boards.11® The Board
responds to these comments above in
section II, subsection C, Factual Support
for the Rule. The Council of Smaller

112 See, e.g., The Golub Corporation, 159 NLRB
355, 369 (1966).

113 See, e.g., 29 CFR 1903.2 (Occupational Safety
and Health Act); 29 CFR 1601.30 (Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964); 42 U.S.C. 2000e-10(a)
(Americans with Disabilities Act); 29 U.S.C. 2619(a)
(Family and Medical Leave Act).

114 75 FR 28386.

115 See, e.g., comments of Buffalo Wild Wings;
Associated Milk Producers, Inc.; Smitty’s, Inc.;
National Grocers Association; and Sorensen/Wille,
Inc.

116 See, e.g., comments of Dr. Pepper Snapple
Group; Georgia Caremaster Medical Services;
Homestead Village, Inc.; Exodus Designs &
Surfaces; Bonnie Dedmore State Farm.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032212.txt,"From:

Sent: 3/24/2018 9:55:46 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High
Flag: Follow up

Thanks! I think we’ve heard enough proofs on this subject today:)

Miroslav Lajéak

Minister zahrani¢énych veci a europskych zalezitosti Slovenskej republiky
Minister of Foreign & European Affairs of the Slovak Republic
Ministerstvo zahrani¢nych veci a eurdpskych zaleZzitosti SR

Hlboka cesta 2 | 833 36 Bratislava 37 | Slovenska republika
tel.: | fax:
a : | www .nzv.sk

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent: sobota, marca 24, 2018 6:39 AM
Subject:

To: Lajcak Miroslav/MINISTER/MZ Vo

https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Pri kontrole tejto spravy nebol najdeny Ziadnyproblém. Ak je tato sprava spam, oznamte to
kliknutim na link nizSie.This message has been scanned and no issues discovered.
Click heré to réport this émail as spam

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032212
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028603.txt,"Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: J

Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

Civil or crime

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM Weingarten, Reid SF wrote:

Turns out you were right about sdny but they are ""going to wait their turn""...

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: J

Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:26 PM Weingarten, Reid Fe wrote:

| will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: J

Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call me Po

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:18 PM Weingarten, Reid ~ si‘“‘“‘i‘*S wrote:

You are not in nyc now are you?

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: J

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028603
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026394.txt,"Men tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with
people, one will not have good social cognition.

IQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect
historically., the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and
anti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia.

At the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to
understanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a
motivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in
music.

It would mean that Chomsky’s life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical
language, is wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge
to build grammatical structure, which the brain simply invents (there are only a few ways in which a natural
language can work). That is much easier to wire into a brain than a specific circuit.

imy self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those
layers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based,. I belive that synphoic movments best
describe your layering. they open with a basic simple melody, , after it is learned , it is repeated and ""
developed"" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a
recapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little
development. -no accident, it mirrors their learning process.

Interesting question if music is somehow indicative of genetically defined prefs, but I am not sure. It could be
path effects, starting in culture.

re taboo
, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly
a good thing for the species

Making having children expensive in terms of upbringing and missed opportunity (like in the west) is a more
humane way. Environmental stress while leaving near rock bottom tends to lead people to have more children,
because there is no missed opportunity, and high mortality requires more attempts at procreation. Humans are a
hardy species, outside of focused famine events and wars only small fractions of any given population die.

I suspect that strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture. The climate
change itself with result in migration and wars, but most people will probably survive that. But who knows, I
might be wrong.

too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense
is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if
the brain discards unused neurons , why shold socieity keep their equivalent

The radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism
is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could
pull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that

everybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable (I visited

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026394
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010992.txt,"CHAPTER 4: MILL’S IDEA

Mill’s Paragraph

It always seemed obvious to me that growth is free. Survival costs investment in the
next generation, but growth costs nothing more. It seemed to me that innovation is
the human specialty, that we pay its cost every day as the cost of being human, and
that growth happens when genius or circumstance somehow gives it traction. I
spent most of my life assuming that all economists, but not politicians, thought the
same. I since learned that economists, following Solow, teach something close but

different. So I guessed that J had hit on something new.

] hadn’t. We read economic history to learn that our ideas are seldom original.
Thomas Malthus, contradicting his friend and rival David Ricardo, wrote something
like my or Mill’s free growth theory in 1820. Chapter 7 of his Principles! says this in

several ways. One example is

“When we have attained...increased and steady profits, we may then begin to
accumulate, and our accumulation will then be effectual. But if, instead of
saving from increased profits, we save from diminished expenditure; if, at the
very time that supply of commodities compared with the demand for them,
clearly admonishes us that the proportion of capital to revenue is already too
great, we go on saving to add still further of our capital, all general principles
concur in showing that we must of necessity be aggravating instead of
alleviating our distresses.”

John Rae renewed this theme in 1834. Book 1, Chapter 10 of his New Principles?

includes

“If an improvement, for instance, in the art of baking bread were effected, by
which, with half the labor and fuel, equally good bread could be produced, it
would not benefit the bakers exclusively, but would be felt equally over the
whole society. The bakers would have a small additional profit, the whole
society would have bread for the product of somewhat less labor, and all who

1 Principles of Political Economy Considered with a View to their Practical Applications
2 Statement of some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy

Chapter 4 Mill’s Idea 1/11/16 1

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010992
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026877.txt,"﻿CNN – CNN Today
New Tariffs — Trade War
Robert Lawrence Kuhn, September 18, 2018
HOST: Robert Lawrence Kuhn
joining us via skype from Beijing.
He's the author of How China's
Leaders Think and a longtime
advisor to Chinese leaders and
corporations. Robert, we appreciate
you joining us. First off, you know it
seems like Trump's strategy here is
to force China into concessions with
these tariffs. What's China's view
on that?
RLK: China's view is that the
economic ties between China and
the rest of the world, the United
States in particular, is very
important for the peace and
prosperity of the world.
RLK: And indeed for the entire
economic relationships and
standards of living of all people.
There are real issues and I think we
need to discuss them. But right
now, China is sending signals by
what it's doing, that it wants to
ratchet down the trade war. It
recognizes that it cannot be
unresponsive.
RLK: In China, the legitimacy of the
government and indeed of the
Communist Party is based upon two
cardinal factors. One is the
economy. This is the 40th year of
China's reform and opening up —
truly an economic miracle, an
astonishing increase in standards of
living.
RLK: The GDP per capita has gone
up more than 50 times in these 40
years. And so that's number one.
But number two is national
rejuvenation, national pride. This is
what the government and the Party
has brought to China in terms of its
position in the world. So it cannot
back down and look weak in terms
of these tariff attacks. But given
that, given that environment, the
Chinese response is very carefully
calibrated.
RLK: China levying tariffs on $60
billion is not dollar for dollar, the
way the first $50 billion was. But
what it is, in fact, is in proportion —
because $60 billion is roughly 40
percent of the roughly $150 billion
of the total US exports to China,
just as $200 billion is roughly 40
percent of the little over $500
billion of the total China exports to
the US.
RLK: So it's a
proportional
response.
The rhetoric
in the press
is also
milder. US
has not been
called so
much of
bullying
anymore.
Also some of
China’s
tariffs are 5
percent as
well as 10
percent,
whereas the
US tariffs are
all 10
percent
[going up to
25 percent].
So China is
sending a
signal that it
wants to
ratchet this
down.
HOST: So, if China is sending these
signals then, Robert, is there a
chance that China would actually
come to the table and continue to
have these trade talks as they've
been scheduled for the coming
days?
RLK: Unlikely that the top trade
negotiator would come under these
circumstances, because then it
looks like they're coming under the
threat of a gun to their head, an
analogy that has been used.
Possibly that a lower level
delegation would come. It's
unlikely though that we'll see any
real movement before the midterm
elections.
RLK: I think there has to be some
backchannel working. To put the
real situation on the table, there are
five major issues that the US is
concerned about in addition to the
trade deficit. The trade deficit is
actually complicated because there
are services of $40 billion dollars
that Chinese tourists and students
pay. It's not excluding the transfer
pricing of components that are
shipped into China. So the trade
deficit, which benefits a lot of
American consumers with cheaper
products at a good quality is not as
relevant as popular opinion would
suggest.
RLK: Most experts do not really
focus on the trade deficit. American
experts focus on five things: the
lack of open Chinese markets;
intellectual property protection,
industrial espionage, including
cyber theft; tech transfer being
forced (in joint ventures);, and
Chinese government subsidies for
critical technologies or industries.
RLK: If we look at these, China's
making real progress in intellectual
property, reducing cyber theft —
more needs to be done. Not
requiring tech transfer. The big one,
which they won't change, is
government subsidy for nascent
technologies of the future. Such
government-industry cooperation is
part of the Chinese system — that's
beyond their red line.
RLK: But China should be able to
open their markets — and we
should be able to have a trade
between seriously open markets,
which even Chinese economists say
is good for the Chinese economy
and very good for the world and
American companies — and some
sort of a recognition that China will
continue to subsidize industries.
That's where it will happen, we
hope soon.
HOST: Yeah. So then if there is
room for a trade deal from an
expert like you, that there's room
for both sides to agree to a deal
that would benefit both the United
States and China. How would you
advise President Trump in terms of
his tactic and how he should
approach China?
RLK: You know, I am not going to
be an expert in advising President
Trump on tactics. I'm not sure he's
amenable to advice and he has his
own style.
RLK: And many people in the US —
let’s put it on the table — who
disagree with Trump on virtually
every other policy — support
Trump either overtly or quietly on
his approach to China. And that's
because there's general recognition
in the US — from Bernie Sanders
Democrats all the way on the left to
the rightwing Republicans all the
way on the right who favor Trump
— that something needs to be done
to alter the US trade relationships,
and the US’ overall relationships,
with China.
RLK: So Trump recognizes that and
he is getting political credit for that
— whether people like it or not.
There's unlikely to be anything
before the midterms, but if
President Trump is doing what he's
doing, he needs to recognize that
these issues that I articulated are
really the critical issues. And China
will be willing to make changes on
them. They've already made
changes on many of them, like on
intellectual property rights, as I
said
RLK: . But if Trump can recognize
what is really needed and what
China will do, then Trump can get a
huge win out of this, which is
actually at the same time beneficial
to China. That's a small needle hole
at this point though which to look.
But I think, ultimately, that's what
will happen.
HOST: Robert Lawrence Kuhn,
thank you very much for your
expertise. I appreciate it.
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011454.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

151
H3VOGIU3

already taken --

MR. CASSELL: Yes.

THE COURT: -- or by the witnesses being compelled to

come and invoke and so on? I think we know how that's going to

work out.

7)

MR. CASSELL: Right. I think in this case it's going

to be through the deposition that's been recorded.

With Mr. Epstein, we're going to bring him here live

because we've been able to reach him by subpoena, but these two

have been difficult to reach by subpoena, that's why we've

taken their deposition.

And so Mr. Epstein will testify live, he would invoke,

Nadia Marcinkova and Sarah Kellen, the deposition has already

been taken. And in our —-

THI

Gl

COURT: What do you do about the statement that

counsel just made about the impropriety of the questions?

MR. CASSELL: Right. So you can't just say, hey, is

the moon made of green cheese and they take the Fifth. You

can't put that in, and Booty recognizes that. There has to be

independent evidence that supports each question that's asked.
And so what we've done in our brief, if you look at

page 17 of our initial paper -- if I can just illustrate one.

r,

THE COURT: No, that's all right. That's fine. I get

the point.

T

MR. CASSELL: Right. But I think this is a fair point

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011454
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032206.txt,"From: Multiple Senders [Multiple Senders]

Sent: 8/24/2017 2:20:29 AM
To: lawkrauss; jeevacation
Subject: lawkrauss -- 2017/08/24
lawkrauss

08/24/2017 01:20:29 AM

lawkrauss
08/24/2017 01:20:39 AM
can we talk tonight? I need advise.

lawkrauss
08/24/2017 03:33:24 AM
I have a question of some urgency. Can you call me tonight a

jeevacation

08/24/2017 10:40:28 AM

Consult a lawyer beforehand, if possible, but be cooperative/nice at this stage. But this sounds like an internal
discipline matter rather than Title IX. Going into court this morning but can focus/reflect more on this after I
emerge (around noon Central). Doing great! Hope you are as well. Breakers at Thanksgiving. Where will
Jeffrey be? Sent from my iPhone On Aug 24, 2017, at 5:24 AM, jeffrey E. wrote: > Lawrence Krauss ,
professor at Arizona , says office of diversity contacts him saying a third party , said you inappropriatly touched
another person in AUSTRAILIA after a Skeptics type event. They asked him to sign a paper saying he received
notice of the investigation, any statments made could not be used in a court to incriminate him . and if he didnt
sign or agree , he was open to disciplinary action. He was concerced that an investigation will now always be
part of his file. . he was going to meet the title nine woman today. does he bring a lawyer. does he record the
meeting , does he say , he will say nothing but is willng to listen ? not a good environment nowadays. how are
you? > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Starr, Ken wrote: > > No. Emphatically not if the victim is not a
student. What's the student-status, if any, of the ""victim?"" > > Hugs, Ken > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug
24, 2017, at 4:48 AM, jeffrey E. wrote: > >> A professor friend is told by title nine person that a third party
filed a complaint alleging inappropriate touching of a person , not the third party , at a bar in another country by
the professor after he gave a lecture for money to an unrelated organization . Jurisdiction? >> --

jeevacation
08/24/2017 10:40:59 AM
from the worlds expert KEN STARR . clinton. removed from Baylor under title 9 .

jeevacation
08/24/2017 05:47:55 PM
news?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032206
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029509.txt,"From: Deepak Chopra Se

Sent: 6/6/2018 11:32:09 AM
To: Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Lunch with Deepak I: LSD, Quantum Healing, and Plato | Psychology Today

Importance: — High
FYI

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psyched/201806/lunch-deepak-i-lsd-quantum-healing-and-
latoPamp& ___twitter_impression=true

Lunch with Deepak I: LSD, Quantum
Healing, and Plato

A skeptic and a mystic seek common ground. Part one of four.

Matthew Hutson
Posted Jun 04, 2018

In March, I attended a debate on the proposition “The more we evolve, the less we need
God,” With Michael Shermer and Heather Berlin for the motion and Deepak Chopra and
Anoop Kumar against the motion. The next day I published an account titled “Do Not
Debate Deepak Chopra” (subtitle: “He’s not even wrong.”). Soon after, Chopra reached out
to me and invited me to lunch. In April I met him in his office at Deepak Homebase in
Manhattan, we had lunch downstairs at ABC Kitchen, and returned to his office. This is a
nearly full transcript of our two-hour conversation.

This is part 1 of 4. Here are parts 2, 3, and 4.
Matt: So, I’m curious why you invited me, what you wanted to talk about.

Deepak: | read your article, ""Not Even Wrong."" [Laughter.] That’s been my label for a long
time from a lot of people, so I thought I’d give you my perspective on what I think reality is
and see if we can expand the conversation.

Matt: So the debate, it seemed like it was ships crossing in the night. The two sides were
talking about different things and so I think it was clear to—or everyone else had one
conception about what the debate was going to be about: the usefulness of the idea of God as
conceived in monotheistic religions. Whereas the two of you were—it seemed like you were
avoiding that debate and talking about something else.

Deepak: So let me give you a little background to that. The first time we were invited to the
debate by the organizers—I didn’t know who they were—the topic was, ""As we evolve do
we need religion?"" So I called the organizers and I said, ""Let me rephrase that if you don’t
mind. Can we say, 'As we evolve do we need religious experience?"" So they said ""We don’t

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029509
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032476.txt,"From: Michael Wolff 
Sent: 2/15/2017 1:53:41 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: A few favors... 
Importance: High 
Thanks. Any time to get together today? 
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:52 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
kathy agreed 
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Michael Wolff__________________________________lwrote: 
When in NYC? 
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle o some of the mess at the 
moment. everyone lawyering up in wash. . 
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Michael Wolff wrote: 
So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT 
called me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I 
wonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and 
that I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy 
Ruemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. 
Are you in NYC soon? 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032476 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032477 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026380.txt,"Steve

About Hogan Lovells

Hogan Lovells is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells

International LLP. For more information, see www.hoganlovells.com.

CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email states it can be
disclosed. It may also be privileged. If received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, but
notify the sender by return email and delete this email (and any attachments) from your system.

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026380
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028617.txt,"please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028617
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030058.txt,"29

Only once before have I been prevented from lecturing at universities
in a country. The other country was Apartheid South Africa.

Despite the faculties' refusals to invite me, I delivered three lectures
to packed auditoriums at the invitation of student groups. I received
sustained applause both before and after the talks.

It was then that I realized why all this happened. At all of the
Norwegian universities, there have been efforts to enact academic and
cultural boycotts of Jewish Israeli academics. This boycott is directed
against Israel's ""occupation"" of Palestinian land—but the occupation
that the boycott supporters have in mind is not of the West Bank but
rather of Israel itself. Here is the first line of their petition: ""Since
1948 the state of Israel has occupied Palestinian land. . .""

The administrations of the universities have refused to go along with
this form of collective punishment of all Israeli academics, so the
formal demand for a boycott failed. But in practice it exists. Jewish
pro-Israel speakers are subject to a de facto boycott.

The first boycott signatory was Trond Adresen, a professor at
Trondheim. About Jews, he has written: ""There is something
immensely self-satisfied and self-centered at the tribal mentality that
is SO prevalent among Jews... . [They] as a whole, are characterized
by this mentality. .. . It is no less legitimate to say such a thing about
Jews in 2008-2009 than it was to make the same point about the
Germans around 1938.""

This line of talk—directed at Jews, not Israel—is apparently
acceptable among many in Norway's elite. Consider former Prime
Minister Kare Willock's reaction to President Obama's selection of
Rahm Emanuel as his first chief of staff: ""It does not look too
promising, he has chosen a chief of staff who is Jewish."" Mr. Willock
didn't know anything about Mr. Emanuel's views—he based his
criticism on the sole fact that Mr. Emanuel is a Jew. Perhaps
unsurprisingly, fewer than 1,000 Jews live in Norway today.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030058
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010986.txt,"pile of nuclear waste in my safe instead of cash and securities? Drive a truck filled
with dynamite into a crowd of unbelievers? Write a book on economics when | have
no credentials? Sing when | have an atrocious voice? All express my tastes. There is
no escape. Behavior reveals taste satisfaction in the broad sense including provision

for future satisfactions.

Tastes, Aims and Ends

| usually mean the word “tastes” as objectives whose satisfaction exhausts capital
value. By that usage, as we just saw, the truism that behavior reveals tastes must be
interpreted carefully. We see current taste satisfaction at mealtimes. Between meals,
we mostly see buildup of capital to satisfy tastes in future. And we sometimes are
motivated to give capital away, as in raising the generation to succeed us. |
sometimes use the term “aims” to mean the sum of this exhaust plus gift plus
buildup. Then to say that output realizes growth plus cash flow is to say that it
realizes aims. All behavior reveals and maximizes aims explained by ends. This

again puts the maximand rule in a different way.

As capital of both factors is our whole means of behavior, and as it is present value
of foreseen taste satisfaction and nothing else, we might first suppose that taste
satisfaction is our unique fina! goal. But that too could mislead. Biology shapes our
tastes, and shapes them to replicate the generations. | treat the biological imperative
as the “ends” driving tastes and aims. Our two complementary ends are adult
survival and replication of both factors for survival of the young. This idea underlies

next generation theory.

What we maximize is risk-adjusted present value of current plus foreseen taste
satisfactions by ourselves plus donees. Current taste satisfaction or exhaust by
ourselves is counted at full value, and foreseen ones are added at a time discount.
Transfer is part of the mechanics. The exhaust plus growth plus gift are the aims, in
whatever proportion we like, and our subliminal deeper motive of lineage survival

is the ends.

Chapter 3: Foundations 1/11/16 15

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010986
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011440.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

137
H3vlgiu2

other than Ms. Maxwell might have been at the same place at the
same time. It's just, you know, a happenstance they were in
the same place and that's not admissible. Well, your Honor
will notice in our opening brief on this, at pages 15 I think

through the next ten pages or so, we've gone through with a

chart and we've said, okay, here's the question we asked, and
then in the right-hand column of our chart we put in the

witnesses and, you know, the flight logs. I know other things

that your Honor is very familiar with. This is why we're
asking these questions. You know, the flight logs have been
talked about over and over again, but for good reason. Kellen

is on some of these flight logs, and what's up? Those are the

questions that we asked, and of course she takes the Fifth.
There are other things as well. For example, Sarah
Ransome testified, I witnessed with my own two eyes Sarah
Kellen reporting to Ghislaine in front of me, but I can't
remember specifics. They weren't talking about girls. I can't

remember the specific conversation, but every single person,

100 percent, 200 percent, reported to Ghislaine. Later on in

that same deposition -- that was at page 288 and thereabouts.
At page 387: I witnessed the same thing -- all the girls
did -- the same thing I had to do was go and report to Sarah

Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Ghislaine Maxwell. Ghislaine was the

main lady. So again, we have an allegation by our client that

Ms. Maxwell was a part of a larger conspiracy. That's one of

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011440
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012149.txt,"“mt
|
t

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

The prosecution has never represented to counsel that they have evidence that would
prove that the inducement or enticement to engage in illegal sexual acts occurred over the phone
(or Internet). The prosecution’s references to “routine and habit” evidence that would substitute
for the explicit communications usually found in the transcripts from chat rooms or sting
operations is tenuous at best. In essence, the prosecution would be alleging communications
understood, but not spoken, by two people, one of whom was usually a secretary or assistant.
Separating the actus reus and the mens rea, however, and premising criminal liability on
persuasion that might occur after the communication, or on the existence of a specific intent to
engage in illegal sex with a minor that arises after the communication would violate the bedrock
principle of criminal law that predicates liability on the concurrence of the act and the criminal
state of mind. Even if, arguendo, the communication and mens rea could be separated (a
premise which is at odds with the requirement of concurrence), Mr. Epstein denies that the
factual proof demonstrates such a pattern or practice. Instead, the evidence compellingly proves
that there was no regularity or predictability to the content of the communication or in what
occurred at meetings that were telephonically scheduled (including those that are the subject of
this investigation).

A second essential element of 2422(b) requires that the defendant “knowingly” induce,
persuade, entice or coerce a person believed to be a minor. “... [K]knowingly .. . induces. . .”
requires the Court to define inducement so it is consistent with its ordinary usage and so the term
is not so broad that it subsumes the separate statutory terms of “entices” and “persuades.”
Inducement has a common legal meaning that has been endorsed by the government when it
operates to narrow the affirmative defense of entrapment. Inducement must be more than “mere
solicitation;” it must be more than an offer or the providing of an opportunity to engage in
prohibited conduct. See, e.g,. United States v. Sanchez-Berrios, 424 F.3d 65, 76-77 (1* Cir.
2005); United States v. Brown, 43 F.3d 618, 625 (11™ Cir. 1995). The government cannot fairly,
or consistent with the rule of lenity, advocate a broader definition of the same term when it
expands a citizen’s exposure to criminal liability than when it limits the ambit of an affirmative
defense to criminal conduct. If the term is ambiguous, absent clear Congressional intent on the
issue, the Court’s decision in Santos requires that the narrower rather than the broader definition
be used.

The facts simply do not prove Mr. Epstein’s culpability for knowingly inducing or
persuading minors. First, in the case of masseuses who agreed or even sought to return to see
Mr. Epstein on successive occasions, there is no evidence that there was any inducement,
persuasion, enticement or coercion over the phone. And, for masseuses seeing Mr. Epstein for
the first time, there was generally no telephone contact with Mr. Epstein and there was no
knowledge that any third party at Mr. Epstein’s specific direction was inviting them to Mr.
Epstein's home over the phone rather than in face-to-face meetings. The women who visited Mr.
Epstein’s home were all friends of friends. Contrary to the facts in this case, § 2422(b)’s
knowing inducement element is essential to federal liability and, given its hefty minimum
mandatory punishment, it should not be interpreted as a strict liability statute.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012149
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016900.txt,"Romanian-born Anca Dragan’s research focuses on algorithms that will enable robots
to work with, around, and in support of people. She runs the InterACT Laboratory at
Berkeley, where her students work across different applications, from assistive robots to
manufacturing to autonomous cars, and draw from optimal control, planning, estimation,
learning, and cognitive science. Barely into her thirties herself, she has co-authored a
number of papers with her veteran Berkeley colleague and mentor Stuart Russell which
address various aspects of machine learning and the knotty problems of value alignment.

She shares Stuart’s preoccupation with AI safety: “An immediate risk is agents
producing unwanted, surprising behavior,” she told an interviewer from the Future of
Life Institute. “Even ifwe plan to use AI for good, things can go wrong, precisely
because we are bad at specifying objectives and constraints for AI agents. Their
solutions are often not what we had in mind.”

Her principal goal is therefore to help robots and programmers alike to overcome
the many conflicts that arise because of a lack of transparency about each other's
intentions. Robots, she says, need to ask us questions. They should wonder about their
assignments, and they should pester their human programmers until everybody is on the
same page—so as to avoid what she has euphemistically called “unexpected side

effects.”

97

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016900
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025689.txt,"achs

Investment Management Division

Economic and Market Monitors

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025689
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026911.txt,"Even so, such robust earnings growth has begun to foster concern that we have reached a peak in
EPS growth. While we do expect the pace of growth to slow next year, a local peak in earnings
growth has not signified an imminent peak in the S&P 500 historically. In fact, about 3/4ths of market
peaks occurred more than two years after the peak in the growth rate of earnings. Moreover, stock
market returns have remained healthy during this period, with high odds of a positive outcome over
the subsequent 6-24 months (see Exhibit 1). In short, the market ultimately follows the path of
earnings and while their growth rate may be slowing, their absolute level is still rising.

1. Average / Median S&P 500 Returns Following Peaks in Earnings Growth

mw Average Total Return = Median Total Return a % of Positive Returns
30% 5

258% * 91%

25% +

20% +

15% +

Total Return (%)

10% -

5% |

0% ~
Next 6 Months Next Year Next Two Years

Source: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.

Inflation and Interest Rates

Inflation data has remained at relatively low levels for all of 2018, as shown in Exhibits 2 and 3. In
fact, some of the most recent data released in October have ticked slightly lower. Average hourly
earnings dropped to 2.8% from the prior month’s level of 2.9%. Headline CPI dropped to 2.3% from
2./% and Core CPI ex-food and energy remain at a low 2.2%, unchanged from the prior month. The
Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation indicator, Core PCE, also remains low at 2.0% which is in line
with the Federal Reserve's target, and unchanged from the prior month.

While 10-year Treasury yields have risen by 0.76% (or 76 basis points) over the course of 2018, we
do not think the resulting 3.2% yield is enough to derail US economic growth. Keep in mind that most
of the recent increase since late August was due to stronger real growth rather than runaway inflation
expectations. We expect interest rates to range between 3.0% and 3.5% in 2019 with a midpoint of
3.25%, barring any major geopolitical conflicts such as one between US and China and or escalating
conflicts in the Middle East.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_02691 1
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024597.txt,"6

example in the 1970s when he had declared that Libyan sovereignty
extended to 200 miles off its coast, when international waters start at
12 miles. He declared that anyone who crossed this ""line of death""
would be subject to attack. The U.S. was planning maneuvers in the
Gulf of Sidra and went inside this 200-mile zone. Qadhafi sent out
three sorties of jets against them, which were promptly shot down.
But after, it was interesting. He said, ""I want to thank the United
States for making me a hero to the Third World."" Standing tall
against a superior adversary has great value in the Arab world.

In your view, is there anything that Qadhafi could have done to
remain in power or is he just fundamentally out of touch with
Libya today?

One should remember back to Saddam Hussein again, and how long
it was before we finally found him. I believe that until the end he
believed that he could get past this and would reach heroic stature for
standing up against the enemy, and that his people would support
him. A couple of questions get asked about leaders here. A, would he
go off to a lush exile as, say, [former Haitian president] ""Baby Doc""
Duvalier did? Or B, would he commit suicide? I don't think either of
those is in the cards for Qadhafi. In fact, he gave this defiant speech
on August 21, which insisted that he was in Tripoli and wouldn't
surrender: ""We cannot go back until the last drop of our blood. I am
here with you. Go on. Go forward."" And in a brief television
statement the same day, ""Go out and take your weapons, all of you.
There should be no fear."" It's a rather different thing than Churchill,
who was advised to move out of London and instead stayed there to
absorb the Blitz along with the British people. He was sort of a role
model for heroism and spoke—again in the first person plural—
about, ""We will stand tall, we will resist this tyranny."" It was really

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024597
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021785.txt,"In October, the police interviewed Ms. Robson, then 19, who told them Mr. Epstein had
routinely paid her to bring teenage girls to his home. The police then interviewed a total
of 5 alleged victims and 17 witnesses, many of whom told similar stories about what they
had observed or participated in at Mr. Epstein’s home. According to the report, at least
one said Mr. Epstein had engaged in intercourse with her.

Mr. Lefcourt, his lawyer, said one girl who told the police of having had sex with Mr.
Epstein as a minor had lied about both the sex and her age and had not shown up for
grand jury questioning. He also said Mr. Epstein had passed a lie-detector test clearing
him of any sexual involvement with under-age girls.

A spokeswoman for the Palm Beach police said that early this year, the police went to
Mr. Krischer, the state attorney, intending to apply for warrants to arrest Mr. Epstein.
Instead, she said, they were told that Mr. Krischer would convene a grand jury to
examine the evidence and decide what charges, if any, to bring.

Around that time, the police report said, Mr. Dershowitz met with prosecutors to share
information about the accusers, including statements they had posted on MySpace.com,
the social networking site, concerning use of drugs and alcohol. According to the report,
Mr. Krischer’s office then decided to delay the grand jury session for several months.

The Palm Beach police grew frustrated, the report said, and on May 1 the department
asked prosecutors to approve warrants to arrest Mr. Epstein.

Chief Reiter also wrote Mr. Krischer questioning “the unusual course that your office’s
handling of this matter has taken” and suggesting that Mr. Krischer disqualify himself.
Chief Reiter refused several requests to be interviewed, and his spokeswoman would not
say explicitly why he had urged the prosecutor to step aside.

Mike Edmondson, a spokesman for Mr. Krischer, said the state attorney’s office
sometimes sent noncapital cases to grand juries when there were questions about witness
credibility. Mr. Krischer does not recommend a particular charge in such cases, Mr.
Edmondson said, but gives the grand jury a list of possible charges.

Bruce J. Winick, a law professor at the University of Miami, said that while prosecutors
in Florida rarely referred noncapital cases to grand juries, they sometimes did so with
sensitive cases to be extra-cautious.

Mr. Lefcourt said the police were wrong to have released the report so soon, especially
without correcting information that later proved wrong. He cited his assertion that one
accuser had lied about her age, adding that she had also been arrested on drug charges

and had been fired by her employer for stealing.

‘What I’m trying to focus on,” Mr. Lefcourt said, “is, What’s motivating the selective
and misleading release of information to the public?”

Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021785
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025851.txt,
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031069.txt,"From: Lawrence Krauss

Sent: 4/6/2011 10:58:21 PM

To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
cc: Lawrence Krauss

Subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?

people are now throwing out my books, according to her blog.. more nonsense..

On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote:

what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Lawrence Kv iii wrote:

Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.

Are you coming this weekend at all?

Lawrence Krauss

Foundation Professor

School of Earth and Space Exploration and Physics Dept.
Co-director, Cosmology Initiative

and Director, Origins initiative

Arizona State University

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

no it was appreciated. thanks

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Lawrence Krauss Ew rote:

just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...

you.. hope all is well..

Begin forwarded message:

From: Rebecca Watson

Date: April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST

To: Lawrence Krauss a>
Subject: Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?

Okay, will do.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Lawrence Krauss <P wrote:

haven't heard from

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031069
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028082.txt,"The Israeli public’s concern over a possible Iraqi attack was growing by the
day, in part because of the precautionary measures we’d taken. We had handed
out gas masks to the whole country. Though I’d been concerned that might raise
the prospect of a chemical attack, I still thought a chemical strike was highly
unlikely. The government rightly decided that nor distributing the masks would
betray a fundamental responsibility to the safety of our citizens. We’d also
issued instructions about how to equip a room, usually the shelter included in
nearly every Israeli home, as a cheder atum, or “sealed room” to keep gas from
getting in. The Israeli media was full of speculation about the likely effects of a
chemical attack. Many families had begun panic buying of food and other
necessities to prepare for the possibility of days and nights in their sealed
shelters.

In my report for Dan, Misha and Shamir a few weeks before the war, I drew
on systematic analysis by a team of experts in the Israeli air force and made my
most specific estimate yet of the damage conventionally armed Scuds might
cause. We had gone back into historical accounts of the closest equivalent: the
Nazis’ use of V-1 and V-2 rockets against London in the Second World War.
Given Saddam’s primary need to fight Americans, and the likelihood either they
or we would take military action against the launchers, we concluded we’d be
hit by roughly 40 missiles, and that, based on Britain’s wartime experience, up
to 120 Israelis might lose their lives as a result.

The first air-raid sirens wailed in Israel at about 2 a.m. on January 18, 1991,
almost exactly 24 hours after the Americans began their bombing raids over
Baghdad. I was home in Kochav Yair. Like other Israelis, we’d set up a sealed
shelter. Though I felt a bit silly doing it, having assured the government Saddam
was vanishingly unlikely to use chemical warheads, we woke up the kids and
Nava took them inside. I put on my own gas mask. But when I ran out to my
car, I removed my mask and put it on the passenger’s seat before heading in to
the kirya. I wanted to get there quickly enough so that the bor, the underground
command bunker, wouldn’t have to reopened when I arrived. I took a short-cut,
through the West Bank town of Qalqilya. That was, to put it mildly, stupid.
Although the intifada had become steadily less intense during the build-up to
the war, it wasn’t completely over. Within seconds, my black sedan was being

234
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028082
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015969.txt,"Hyper-Computing 279

The Weird and Wonderful
There are some really weird and wonderful proposals for machines
capable of super-Turing thought. Let’s take a bit of a flight of fantasy.

If we could make a spaceship survive the inhospitable environment
near a spinning black hole, it might be possible to send information
backward in time. We could see the answer to a calculation before we
had to go to the trouble of calculating it in the first place.

1 i
j

Black Hole Malament-Holgarth Space

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015969
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032900.txt,"must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
believe you have received this email in error. Global Counsel LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England with
number 0C359787, registered office New Bridge Street House, 30-34 New Bridge Street, London, United Kingdom EC4V 6B).
Disclaimer This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to
whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of Global Counsel LLP and Global Counsel Advisory Limited . If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
believe you have received this email in error. Global Counsel LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England with
number 0C359787, registered office New Bridge Street House, 30-34 New Bridge Street, London, United Kingdom EC4V 6B).

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
Disclaimer This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to
whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of Global Counsel LLP and Global Counsel Advisory Limited . If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must
neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
have received this email in error. Global Counsel LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England with number
0C359787, registered office New Bridge Street House, 30-34 New Bridge Street, London, United Kingdom EC4V 6B).
Disclaimer This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to
whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of Global Counsel LLP and Global Counsel Advisory Limited . If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must
neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
have received this email in error. Global Counsel LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England with number
0C359787, registered office New Bridge Street House, 30-34 New Bridge Street, London, United Kingdom EC4V 6B).

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032900
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018093.txt,"changes in the political regime and the conviction that no basis can
remain the same when its constituent components have changed.

The components, whether in Cairo or Riyadh, are changing, but the
two sides continue to reach out to the other in the midst of a raging
storm.

It is impossible to predict the end of a story having so many different
and intricately interwoven threads. Yet, it would be equally
impossible to ignore the Palestinian factor at this moment of Arab
ferment, as much as it has been impossible at times of Arab
stagnation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018093
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020145.txt,"° Why it matters: The ruling is a blow to AT&T's attempt to show that the
lawsuit to block the deal is politically motivated by President Trump's antipathy for
CNN, which Time Warner owns. AT&T says it wasn't asked to offload any assets as
part of the deal until after Trump took office.

° What they're saying: “We respect the judge’s decision and look forward to
the upcoming trial,” said Dan Petrocelli, who is leading AT&T and Time Warner's
defense in the case, in a statement.

° At a hearing on Friday, a Justice Department lawyer said that AT&T's
argument for the documents ""didn't make sense.""

° Go deeper: Our report from the courtroom on Friday, when DOJ and AT&T
presented their arguments.

Fund scoop: Niv Dror, who joined AngelList through its acquisition of Product Hunt
in 2016, is raising a small early-stage fund focused on consumer products, multiple
sources tell Axios. Dror declined to comment.

° The fund will raise at least $1 million, though one source says it could go up to
$2-3 million.

° Like Product Hunt colleague Ryan Hoover’s own VC fund, Dror’s will be
managed on the back-end by AngelList.

Same old story: Yesterday, I grabbed coffee with Day One Ventures founder Masha
Drokova, and heard a familiar—and still disappointing—story: While raising her fund,
she was told by prospective investors that she should get a male co-founder.

° She initially considered the suggestion, she told me, before remembering it's
rooted in sexism.

Softbank $$$: Softbank’s Vision Fund is in early talks to raise additional funds from
Bahrain’s sovereign wealth fund, Mumtalakat, the latter’s CEO told Reuters.

° The Persian Gulf has been a major source of funds for the Vision Fund: Public
Investment Fund, Saudi Arabia’s main sovereign wealth fund, and Abu Dhabi’s
Mubadala, are already investors.

° And it’s not the only one visiting the region’s investors—funds focused on tokens
and cryptocurrencies have also been fundraising in the area, I’m told.

Unicorn stampede: We're not even two months into 2018 and yet, seven startups
have already seen their private valuations cross the $1 billion mark—earning “unicorn”
status—according to Pitchbook. Last year: 53. The word “overvalued” comes to mind...

The BFD

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020145
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011326.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

23
H3VOGIU1

which has been produced in discovery and submitted to this
Court, shows that it was defendant who sent her to Thailand,

sending her with handwritten instructions about what to do when

she gets there. So if this unsupported argument that defendant

left the United States because of some accusation of a tip jar

is to be believed, then that makes defendant an accessory after
the fact and implicates her in the wrongdoing.

So I don't -- basically, there's just -- this argument
is also undone by the fact that later, Ms. Giuffre comes back
to the United States to live here. She's not fleeing
accusations, she was fleeing defendant. If she were worried

about criminal liability in the United States, she wouldn't

come back to live here.

But the overall point is any marginal probative value

from these allegations, which I don't think there is any, but

it's far vastly outweighed by the prejudice it would cause

Ms. Giuffre and should b xcluded under all those rules.

Moving now to point 10. Ms. Giuffre has requested

that the Court exclude any evidence regarding special

schooling, truancy, and juvenile delinquencies. For this
argument, your Honor, I request that I approach the bench and

give you a few documents upon which these arguments are based.

I have four documents that I'm handing up.

I have to get a little bit into the weeds here, so

please bear with me. In this case, Ms. Giuffre -- well, school

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011326
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012497.txt,"—_

oO ODN OOO Fw ON

—_

> WwW NY

~0929104. TXT

119
THE WITNESS: Yeah.
BY MR. TEIN:

Q. And your father filed a lawsuit, the first
lawsuit for fifty million dollars against Mr. Epstein
without consulting you, correct?

Q. And your father had a lawyer file the first

fawsuit on your behalf for fifty million dollars against

Mr. Epstein without your knowledge, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. And you don't trust your father, do you?
A. Correct.

Q. And you believe he’s trying to manipulate

you for his own gain, don't you?

A. Sort of.

Q. Well, you know that your mother filed a
statement, an affidavit, saying that you don't trust your
father and that you believe he's trying to manipulate you

for his own gain; isn't that correct?

A. Correct.

Q. You agree with that statement, don't you?
A. Uh-huh. Yes.

Q. Do you trust your stepmother?

A. My stepmother, no.

Q. You think she's also trying to steal your

120
Epstein lawsuit money away from you, don't you?
A. | would like to clarify something. You
keep saying my Epstein lawsuit money. | don't have any

money, and it's just a lawsuit at the moment. So | just
Page 102

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012497
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013951.txt,"It might be emotionally difficult, but you won’t starve. Park your car in the garage and cancel
insurance for a few months. Carpool or take the bus until you find the next gig. Rack up some more
credit card debt and cook instead of eating out. Sell all the crap that you spent hundreds or thousands on
and never use.

Take a full inventory of your assets, cash reserves, debts, and monthly expenses. How long could you
survive with your current resources or if you sold some assets?

Go through all expenses and ask yourself, If I had to eliminate this because I needed an extra kidney,
how would I do it? Don’t be melodramatic when there is no need—few things are fatal, particularly for
smart people. If you’ve made it this far in life, losing or dropping a job will often be little more than a
few weeks of vacation (unless you want more) prior to something better.

3. Health insurance and retirement accounts disappear if I quit.
Untrue.

I was scared of both when I was eliminated from TrueSAN. I had visions of rotting teeth and working
at Wal-Mart to survive.

Upon looking at the facts and exploring options, I realized that I could have identical medical and
dental coverage—the same provider and network—for $300-500 per month. To transfer my 401(k) to
another company (I chose Fidelity Investments) was even easier: It took less than 30 minutes via phone
and cost nothing.

Covering both of these bases takes less time than getting a customer service rep on the phone to fix
your electric bill.

4. It will ruin my resume.
I love creative nonfiction.

It is not at all difficult to sweep gaps under the rug and make uncommon items the very things that get
job interviews. How? Do something interesting and make them jealous. If you quit and then sit on your
ass, I wouldn’t hire you either.

On the other hand, if you have a one-to-two-year world circumnavigation on your resume or training
with professional soccer teams in Europe to your credit, two interesting things happen upon returning to
the working world. First, you will get more interviews because you will stand out. Second, interviewers
bored in their own jobs will spend the entire meeting asking how you did it!

If there is any question of why you took a break or left your previous job, there is one answer that
cannot be countered: “I had a once-in-a-lifetime chance to do [exotic and envy-producing experience]
and couldn’t turn it down. I figured that, with [20-40] years of work to go, what’s the rush?”

The Cheesecake Factor

Would you like me to give you a formula for success? It’s quite simple, really. Double your rate of
failure.

—THOMAS J. WATSON, founder of IBM

SUMMER 1999

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013951
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013789.txt,"Smotherman, W.P., Selz, K.A., Mandell, A.J. (1996) Dynamical entropy is
conserved during cocaine-induced changes in fetal rat motor patterns.

Psychoendocrinology 21:173-187

So, P., Francis, J.T., Netoff, T.1., Gluckman, J., Schiff, S.J. (1998) Periodic orbits: a
new language for neuronal dynamics. Biophys. J. 74:2776-2785

So, P., Ott, E., Sauer, T., Gluckman, B.J., Grebogi, C., Schiff, S.J. (1997) Extracting
unstable periodic orbits from chaotic time series. Phys. Rev. E55:5398-5417

Sprott, J.C. (1993) Strange Attractors; Creating Patterns in Chaos. M&T Books.
N.Y.

Sprott, J.C., Rowlands, G. (1991) Chaotic Data Analyzer. Am. Institute Physics.
N.Y.

Stam, C.J., Nicolai, J., Keunen, R.W. (1998) Nonlinear dynamical analysis of

periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges Clin Electroencephalogr 29:101-105

Stanley, H.E. (1971): Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena.
Oxford University Press, Oxford

Stauffer, C. (1985) Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor and Francis. London
Stergiopulos, N., Porret, C.A., De Brower, S., Mesiter, J.J. (1998) Arterial
vasomotion: effect of flow and evidence of nonlinear dynamics. Am J Physiol

274:H1858-1864

Steriade, M., McCarley, R.W. (1990) Brainstem Control of Wakefulness and Sleep.
Plenum. N.Y.

289

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013789
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030967.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 12/22/2018 2:17:57 PM 
To: Steve Bannon 
Subject: Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill 
powells statment at his press conference were inane. . suffers from, this is what was done in the past. 
!!! BEFORE the internet. . the numbers they look at are not reflective of todays economy, . AT ALL. 
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM Steve Bannon wrote: 
https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-
rate-hike  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030967 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011871.txt,"/ BARAK / 114

Labor leadership contest. “Shalom, Ehud,” he said when I answered the phone and,
without small talk or preliminaries, asked me: “What do you think we should do?”

I said I couldn’t offer specific suggestions. “It’s a detail-related question, and I
don’t know the details.” But I advised him on the process I felt would be needed to
come up with the right answer when the chief-of-staff, the former air force chief
Dan Halutz, briefed the cabinet. “Halutz will propose what to do. Push him,” I
said. “When he presents his recommended action, ask him for his assessment of
what Hizbollah will do in response. When he, or the head of military intelligence,
has given you the range of possibilities and told you which is the most likely, say,
OK, let’s assume that happens. What’s our next step? How is that going to lead us
to our main objectives? And what are the objectives?” Newspaper reports the next
morning said that Shimon, and only Shimon, did indeed press the chief-of-staff
about each further stage of the operation and about the aims that we wanted to
accomplish. But Halutz finally fobbed him off by saying that once they gof to the
later phases, they could discuss it.

From the first reports I received through my army contacts, I feared the
operation would go badly. There was no doubt we could inflict damage on
Hizbollah. But there were no clear answers to the questions Shimon had raised.
The initial Israeli air force response had been put in place more than five years
earlier, when I was Prime Minister. Codenamed “Operation Cinnamon Sticks,” it
was designed to take out all of the fixed Hizbollah missile sites we had been able
to identify. We knew its limitations. A lot of the rockets were fired from mobile
launchers. But in one exercise, the known “Hizbollah” sites were replicated in the
Galilee. They were destroyed in 43 minutes. I had no doubt that part of the plan
would succeed. In the early hours of July 13, it took only 34 minutes to destroy the
nearly 60 launchers we had pinpointed over the previous five years.

But Operation Cinnamon Sticks had been intended as a first step in a far wider
assault on Hizbollah and other targets, including a number of infrastructure
installations, deeper inside Lebanon. It was part of a plan for a full-scale war, if the
government decided that was necessary. As the early public statements by Olmert
and other ministers made clear, they did not intend to start a war, at least at the
outset. They certainly didn’t have a coherent plan for one. But they would soon
find themselves in Israel’s longest single armed conflict since 1948. When
Hizbollah fired hundreds of missiles at Israeli towns and cities, our operation
intensified not by plan or military logic, but improvisation. As a former Prime

400
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011871
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022065.txt,"CHAPTER 22

Jeffrey Epstein: 1976-1981

ccording to several published reports, it was Ace Green-
mn, Ted, who introduced Epstein to Greenberg.
rg’s daughter, Lynne, was
g to them, that was how

berg’s so
But other sources say Greenbe
e. Accordin

dating Epstein at the tim
ns—by charming a young and beau-

Epstein got ito Bear Stear
d using her to advance his career.
as an assistant to a trader on ©

quickly worked up to junior ~
led to a share of the prof q

tiful woman an
At Bear Stearns, Epstein started

the American Stock Exchange and
partner, which meant that he was entit
sts, Still in his twenties, he was running with the bu
down any doors that stood in his way.

The view from Ace Greenberg's 0
s striking. At night, the whole city wa

ffice, high above Madison

i
Avenue in midtown, wa s lit P
up like a stage set.

It was Epstein’s city now, to win or to lose. And there were

96

Ils, kicking ©

women to go with the
brunettes, who would
day. Now they found E
Greenberg's gorgec
If Greenberg knew
Then again, Greenber;
gan era, when deregu
the horizon. But there
ernment oversight on V
traders had begun to }
of the age of corporate
out for him, Epstein h:
ing his weight arounc
numbers earned him
where he worked on e3
a select group of Be:
within the elite—inch
In the spring of 19
| St. Joe Minerals Cor]
3 share, or close to thre
_ whole offer amounted
But St. Joe’s execut
4 company. In a press ri
4 ited and dismissed it a:
; BEC decided to investi;
; There were allegatic
Pear Stearns’s employe
q Epstein got called
‘oh ongdoing.
q But, as it turned ou

a

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022065
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013206.txt,"290 16 AGI Preschool

and set it loose in the everyday human world; but of course, this isn’t feasible given the current
state of development of robotics technology. So one must seek approximations. Toward this end
we have embodied OpenCogPrime in non-player characters in video game style virtual worlds,
and carried out preliminary experiments embodying OpenCogPrime in humanoid robots. These
are reasonably good options but they have limitations and lead to subtle choices: what kind of
game characters and game worlds, what kind of robot environments, etc.?

One conclusion we have come to, based largely on the considerations in Chapter 11 on
development and Chapter 9 on the importance of environment, is that it may make sense to
embed early-stage proto-AGI and AGI systems in environments reminiscent of those used for
teaching young human children. In this chapter we will explore this approach in some detail:
emulation, in either physical reality or an multiuser online virtual world, of an environment
similar to preschools used in early human childhood education. Complete specification of an
“AGI Preschool” would require much more than a brief chapter; our goal here is to sketch the
idea in broad outline, and give a few examples of the types of opportunities such an environment
would afford for instruction, spontaneous learning and formal and informal evaluation of certain
sorts of early-stage AGI systems.

The material in this chapter will pop up fairly often later in the book. The AGI Preschool
context will serve, throughout the following chapters, as a source of concrete examples of the
various algorithms and structures. But it’s not proposed merely as an expository tool; we are
making the very serious proposal that sending AGI systems to a virtual or robotic preschool is
an excellent way — perhaps the best way — to foster the development of human-level human-like
AGI.

16.1.1 Contrast to Standard AI Evaluation Methodologies

The reader steeped in the current AI literature may wonder why it’s necessary to introduce a
new methodology and environment for evaluating AGI systems. There are already very many
different ways of evaluating AI systems out there ... do we really need another?

Certainly, the AI field has inspired many competitions, each of which tests some particu-
lar type or aspect of intelligent behavior. Examples include robot competitions, tournaments of
computer chess, poker, backgammon and so forth at computer olympiads, trading-agent compe-
tition, language and reasoning competitions like the Pascal Textual Entailment Challenge, and
so on. In addition to these, there are many standard domains and problems used in the AI liter-
ature that are meant to capture the essential difficulties in a certain class of learning problems:
standard datasets for face recognition, text parsing, supervised classification, theorem-proving,
question-answering and so forth.

However, the value of these sorts of tests for AGI is predicated on the hypothesis that the
degree of success of an AI program at carrying out some domain-specific task, is correlated
with the potential of that program for being developed into a robust AGI program with broad
intelligence. If humanlike AGI and problem-area-specific “narrow AI’ are in fact very different
sorts of pursuits requiring very different principles, as we suspect, then these tests are not
strongly relevant to the AGI problem.

There are also some standard evaluation paradigms aimed at AI going beyond specific tasks.
For instance, there is a literature on “multitask learning"" and “transfer learning,” where the
goal for an AT is to learn one task quicker given another task solved previously [Car97, TM95,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013206
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029938.txt,"?

lot of all those charged with a crime, but which, given the identity of
the accused in question, could only degenerate into globally observed
torture—high punishment for a crime, which no one, at that point,
knew whether or not he had committed.

This vision of Dominique Strauss-Kahn humiliated in chains,
dragged lower than the gutter—this degradation of a man whose
silent dignity couldn’t be touched, was not just cruel, it was
pornographic. And it was at least as pornographic (because, I repeat,
it’s the same thing) as attorney Kenneth Thompson’s visible glee in
expounding on the state of his client’s “vagina” [sic] before the entire
world.

2. The Robespierrism of this judicial sideshow.

What is Robespierrism? It’s a word taken from the French
Revolution, of course, one that describes the way those behind the
terror at the time took hold of a man of flesh and blood and
dehumanized him by transforming him into an abstract symbol, and,
as the literal incarnation of that symbol, tailored his person to fit the
skin of all they had decided to purge from society of the Ancien
Régime.

Well, we are compelled to observe that, regarding the Strauss-Kahn
affair, America the pragmatic, that rebels against ideologies, this
country of habeas corpus that de Tocqueville claimed possessed the
most democratic system of justice in the world, has pushed this
French Robespierrism, unfortunately, to the extremes of its craziness.
In this case, Dominique Strauss-Kahn was no longer Dominique
Strauss-Kahn. He was no longer a singular man gifted with a
singular word, one whose version of the facts should have been
carefully heard in order to compare it with that of his accuser. No. He
was the symbol of arrogant France. He was the emblem of the world
of the privileged, odiously sure of their own impunity. He was the
mirror of this world of white global bankers that constitutes Wall

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029938
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026169.txt,"please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026169
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033581.txt,"From: 
Sent: 12/7/2016 5:31:19 PM 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Re: 
well heaven can wait 
In a message dated 12/7/2016 12:30:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jeevacation@gmail.com writes: 
Oy 
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:29 PM, wrote: 
yikes your birthday coming up next month 
In a message dated 12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jeevacation@gmail.com writes: 
plenty left 
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jonathan Farkas wrote: 
Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in 
this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best jonathan 
Sent from my iPhone 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033581 
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023732.txt,"HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023732
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025460.txt,"Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/12/19 04:11:46 AM (579352306)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8EH135DFD-B5AE-4146-8B12-OF1FCF8D9770

Message: Yes when midway occurred they were still eating rats for breakfast.

Literally . I guess you could argue ,we broke the whole neighborhood. . South Korea
, Japan and china / ‘ Long game

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/12/19 04:13:28 AM (579352408)
Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 6184704C-91ED-47AB-9949-4635CD6E0E07

Message: They sent their soldiers to be educated by us, took our money, our tech,
and look back to midway with a smile

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/12/19 04:14:13 AM (579352453)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: E7C64712-1B66-4C48-A0F3-CO6214DCF45F

Message: Always show weakness , exagerate it. First chapter art of war

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/12/19 04:15:12 AM (579352512)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: BD2F8564-6EA0-4997-9EC7-892D5C4D1 321

Gl

Message: That's why a military display makes sense. Let them and others see, daddys.
Spanking paddle

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/12/19 04:16:02 AM (579352562)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 78C81316-4D0C-40E9-9EAD-384F3FE7556B

Message: And its willingness to use it

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025460
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026520.txt,"E ie duso ej ap fedpuud 008
-eliosog Ue TEPUE erad Asal
foul jp EHUD | -sa San a femgonn au pe wos eine ee ES
fs bt ot ‘2 | -sapajut ua auataut ‘opunut P PIQUIO|OD

tape uod ‘eetPEN,
as uaib ‘Our
Joo eRe “mbes
easy ej rod eysand
aj epipew ET “O20
gq open ap TEA
req [a Ua OpeZte?
anb ‘squanepdm |
euopeUsayut ayUe>
junsaad un ap UoP

ep onruued saueul
zyeal oayeredo uN,

ap op ayuesye,
sad e UsLIOHEd
qwisianr

sp perea aueprsord |
— auqns0 ap E12
ewjogeeneaucg |

WIDIHO VLISIA

zaed oltp ‘ .peplanalqo Tu
epyeqnau ‘peprepredun
uo) oprpasoid Jaqey ou
od sauomalqo selias usn
oupg anb ya ue pepiauopr
ap oytsinber fap 1Dap grb
IN, “woreusndunt of umb
-OLIeW] UOATOdEN, 10359N,
ouepepnp je A (OY) 22
-Bq soupuy eIsiajquuiese [J
SOWUATLIEUOTSAN? SEUL OI
-Dal UPHENMUNWUOD ap ED
-uapuauuadns | & BOLO
sopeD ap uopepmsod ey
sew souopeusndui
sop aq!9a4 BO49Q
S.LNSONALNINAdNS

-xeqndod eruex
“OOS EB] OUIOD [SE ‘onpunl
QVUSIUTEUApIO [a EyUa]OIA |

“‘agDeIZajut ap oses0ad

jp odsau ua auod “uid

-31 P| ap PLeDoulap EF] EQ
-U0D EJUAYe,, OSa “Sole EI
“UODMNSUI BSA TEUTUMTS
ap saioulayxg SSUODETSY
ap sonstuty] ep OUIpUY:
olasuoD [ap USISDap FT
uorezeypad OUTPUT OWUAUT
-E[fed PPP SOIQUUaILLL SO]

auialo ns ezeyoad
oulpuy OJUBWeYed |
OOVOINNWOD

ee

ua seuosied 000'8z 9P odmba
un aut oz0z ¥ NAL 3p
OTE OOL AP SF
e es anb ezedsa
ag ‘gauotsuedxa 4 sojjoresep
so] 2p osruordto9 ap eauT] nS
uo “NAL 2p seucii 9 ap
seu ofeuew pHoA dd raliya
ugq ‘sosaduy SMS °P sayed
seyend saQq ep seut piauad

-ne pe

ap sauoj[iut $'Z 0SE259 52
orxauros Ja Jopendg VOD

sop Ua UOIEIOSE as YeIOUr

-nf wiped Ua BVA ETP SEI
| -sand sapepatdoid seraumd
sey ‘ezanbu spur guredsep
“reqna, $9 OUIO? “[EDSy OF

-ang we BySTUODNIE $2 A aad =
be. eure peuyut
an aqaug Ams [PP
esuaury ‘edomg “eougy ‘epel
ua eyDTeul Us soTjouresap sonentt
soy sopmpul ‘sqquaugUuos 9 Ue
Seumueut sapeuTuLlie} 9 ap seul
ap eiapep eun oueh prom dd
“SIqON ap eAPATIG eun{
e[ ap orquiettt A oagnsala 101

WB ayuoul

“€L0Z AP oynl 4 ora 7 yeAON i rat bk
ixo Saze]o ugadure opts
ee ame sa8oy apuop A soruaid ue

sauoprur ¢'1 oedez anb sta

“se1oy gp Ua sop —-9 °P yenue oouz0) un rant

-Tpuaa uoTaNy soquatmeyede as apuop ‘oprzapoul o1ad
~ ogg ‘Zo0z our [a “seseut “ooTUAE]S! OPEISA —

-sap ‘WUnpeN [Vv prysed Ud
peureyonw, anbal [a 10d opez
-aqeoua ‘TeuoTTySUOD emb
-reuoui ap euraysts un 10d
optfar sa ourerqod nS
“pepnp F] esararne F083
PP eperes ene op oyurentiy

orerrqourur op

ophsauod PY WINOPEW TY
eNSELIP E| TETUeEY OTUOUTE,
-ed outo3 o2joned ja od sop

-pnpoad sosazsur so| U0D
“saumoy[iua Cr AGL § ap uoz
“BI & -1007 OWE UOTAIPUIA
95 “Seqiog ep 503 so, 2p
aourex[e [E UE}SA O]OS SAUO1S
-ueul sng “Ipunuredew ap
PULIO} WO? seIawTed ap sop
-P110} S3}0|s! ap oyuMtuOD UN
so pploy SUL ‘eqnq ue pep
-aidoid eun 1otaj exed 01.
-eUoTTU Jas anb sey “sare
[hd ‘WITS SopeD “weIpag
plac “UouUl[D [ld &

joyoore jo A TUpiiq je
BIQ]O] OS OPUOP ‘OL

OOTWPISI Opeyse Ul)

sarouayue Se]
uaiquie} seus! b ‘sIqQoN 3p 504
-qnnala soj 104 opeyedurose #1
“3s A opeatid jal un ua ‘Koy pred
-aqjanb orRULTLLOD OTS [EHES
_giduua 109s [ap savuety o1ed
“palloD ayuepisel
naz ey ap A ums TP epesell

Jeosy osyered un we outa ns :

Ivana Sa OLSa

__ oygedsep ns ue s1q}9e4 Bapod oj ou JON BUeL apfedte j9 ""EU e ale Ns 10
gllosog US UOISJEAUI JeZEUe B1ed eawog J9B}2Y UOD BulUNad as WAAeINg UIq

« “gund OV: oy w0d ops BL ap eauy et een
oy onreUOTIIE ay — oueig asd “aLWand ySaudNa
ur un ap BuO} E| ZepOBeT E2 :

ye a yoRestunwo? FT page ae — < des
: ap soagnaale e sauoisez0 -TUI134 eaonu E[ 21q0S- es
dd eP $90 ua woraiqrer uoreZi[eat °S apuop ‘wodully

ap solos soo $0] k yoq
-ah| woo seuolunat sasout th
ayueinp volaianjueu ee

-w10 B] 2p SOAT! {q wodurly
ap ened eqeulioy anb ‘syee
praiaeu &] ep gquonce sey] seu

oD WOTU
Pre -o} ua Epesazequt risa Mdd

“oye ase eqn o}oze enb epnep 6p S80
ai an} : ap auquiainou Bs eee Be
14 oyeaiue [8 ‘gang 8p sauorsianu| 8P ugIne

oj ap eagoaup eqn! el ©P ayed Quod

engi ue epepENy ‘voz ee Ny IEF FANG

$i.-.--------= _....------------

""egng ua Aysuenlup)
wasa[ppIy Ua OUBIOUOY
QpaN}S0p UN gIDaSUOS 3] 8S
“Aas “eyepeld vs Aisenul)
ayduuay B| 8p BILUOUIODS

ua BUNVEIOUad|] BUN OIG

feqng ap WnopeV)
aqueweqos jap emu)
qed sosase any WaAPINS
uig ap auped 1g “xx ojBis
ja apsap souaw fe eqnd

@uquua!oip ap ZI |9
BqSeEY POM Ieqng
@p equepiseid

eng 1eqng

|@ Ue GGG} Ue O1IDEN

TINDVAYND B 28 Woo ESELEMBnngezien| “OULS¥> OuNEaVZuy;

‘ ap ar
we repuodsns anb 9] 2
rgtaaid SoUOTsIaAu! Sel gure’
ou Bisa ‘ourstqod I? andes
-ugpesedo SP ostunad
jep omer 19 rod ugpednsoaid
ns 10q2N eprert® TF ag a
“op -poaseyta aso{ uen{ 4 SidoN
odniZ ja uo? ojunt podully
‘sepunjoid sende ap ovend
yep omos- BIOIEQLV odnus [Pp
sauoisiaAu] ap 1oysa1Ip *Esno]
otmoyy aso OWE 215° OP ont
apsp epenus eyed eun Uy
“opyiqeo [9P °F
-euopuny oe un OSAAdXA ©
guzzyuoa ‘sauny j> FISEY “Ted
<euiry ua pre}se onsaeur0sing
Iq “Exep as ou “uodurry odnis
je ostuutad [2 €1FI0A91 Of “SO}
lang ap eejeasqns ET ap
s9aeq B ‘ouIaIqoD |? anb ap
sondsap einjonyseeyur esa
ap ugisonsjsu0> e] Oprpuayep
ey uamb ‘joqan eutrel ‘pepnio
P] ap apre2ye [2 UOd eID FT
‘eliosog Ua Sep
-unjord sense ap opiand [p ‘pep
-nip ej ered sayueyiodul seul
SoUOISI@AUL sajqisod SE] op Pun
aiqos IEyed} ered ‘ealioD [arjey
‘eoyjqndey e] ap ajueptsead [a
uod ElIuNal ag Jopenog e Aoy
esaqt ‘(Ad d) PHOM Hod reqnd
Opunw Ja Ue ONeND o1aUIMU PL
-enjiod eropeiado be] op OUR}
-oAeul BJsTUOIN2e ‘WadE[NS UIq
pewyy Teqnd ep Urns Ti
-edoing ue anb zapidea eur
-sTu e] UoD sopeypedsap (NAL)
said QZ ap Sa1Opaua}UO ap seu
-o][TU ¢‘ WeSaT] OU je spuop
‘qmbeden5 ung ooyneg jap
aquryiodui seu ojand pepnp
e] ‘euye’] EUsury ep euoz eIsa
ua “ieyey ezpod ou A na
-ag A EIqUIO[OD Ua seureny
-zod sauorsiaaul auay ke,

dil
pawiyy

WZr] OWNaTIINS

eliosog Jod 1e\sode ered

reqnqd ep UeyNs

Zl Bed |
‘sourtioyense | 4
sod epezijeue eureq¢ By
yoRieg ap BULNOOp BT]
OaNnW

Lied
PITWOUOIE
“puBjozau™ I
PI ejonuo eB ppeyo} | ||
sa vanes? proujod #7] |

BSOT]

Ao

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026520
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033149.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 5/31/2019 9:33:59 AM

To: Michael Wo! ff ae

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/27/us/politics/trump-school-grades.html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033149
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020672.txt,"HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020672
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531.txt,"Page 22 of 42
103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *888

institutional culture of professionalism than many state prosecutor offices, departmental policies and priorities can change
substantially with presidential administrations - as they have recently. !4! Nonetheless, this federalism-based model of
prosecutorial oversight has an advantage shared by the administrative review schemes within single prosecution agencies. In
both settings, those with review power are prosecutors who should have greater institutional competence and legitimacy to
second-guess other prosecutors’ charging decisions, and consequently less inclination than courts to defer to prosecutorial
judgments.

This federalist model of enforcement redundancy did not evolve from earlier common law institutional arrangements, like
private prosecution, nor from the modern victims’ rights movement, like judicial and administrative review of decisions not to
prosecute. Federal criminal law enforcement expanded for several reasons, but behind many of those reasons is a common
purpose: to remedy glaring patterns of underenforcement by the states. For example, federal law and institutional capacity
(such as the advent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation) expanded in response to states’ inability to confront adequately the
tise of interstate violence and drug crimes (as well as, for a time, prohibition on alcohol manufacture and distribution). !47
Federal law [*889] took on the primary role in combatting local government corruption - including police corruption and
excessive uses of force - which local prosecution agencies often lacked the ability, or political independence, to confront. 7
And federal law has long attempted to fill the gap when racially biased local police, prosecutors, and juries declined to arrest,

prosecute, or convict suspects - especially white ones - who victimized black citizens. !44 In sum, the redundant enforcement

104 Strafprozebetaordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], §§152, 160, 170, translation at /htips://www.gesetze-im-
internet.de/englisch_ stpo/englisch_stpo-html (Ger.) (defining prosecution duty to investigate suspected crime and indict when evidence is
sufficient); id. §§171-75 (providing for judicial orders to prosecute, including victim's right to seek order compelling prosecution);
Bohlander, supra note 72, at 25-27, 67-71, 103-04 (describing German procedures to compel prosecutions under statutory legality principle);

Novokmet, supra note 70, at 92-93. Failures to charge when required to do so can expose a prosecutor to discipline or even criminal liability.
See Strafgesetzbuch [StGB] [Penal Code], § 339, translation at https://www .gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html (Ger.)
(establishing that rechtsbeugung, or perversion of justice, is punishable by one to five years in prison); id.§§258, 258a (establishing
punishment for police or prosecutor's failure to investigate or prosecute colorable offenses).

105 See Shawn Marie Boyne, The German Prosecution Service: Guardians of the Law? 8-10, 91-92 (2014) (quoting Hans-Heinrich Jescheck,
The Discretionary Powers of the Prosecuting Attorney in West Germany, 18 Am. J. Comp. L. 508, 511 (1970)); Markus D. Dubber, Criminal
Process in the Dual Penal State: A Comparative-Historical Analysis, in Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process, supra note 60; see also Klaus
Sessar, Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany, in The Prosecutor 255, 272-73 (William F. McDonald ed., 1979). For the German example of
this principle, see Strafprozebetaordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure],§§152, 160, 170, translation at htips://www.gesetze-im-
internet.de/englisch_stpo/englisch_stpo.html (Ger.) (defining prosecution duty to investigate suspected crime and indict when evidence is
sufficient).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030820.txt,"Eye on the Market | November 21, 2011 J.P Morgan

Topic: The quixotic search for energy solutions

A setback for nuclear, and some investment consequences
The saddest energy moment of the year was the failure of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in March. Weaknesses of

the original design and actions taken in the immediate aftermath of a massive tsunami combined to produce a disaster: the latest
studies show emissions of radioactive cesium that are equal to half of the release from Chernobyl. The concept of nuclear power
is one of man’s greatest achievements, but generating it safely and in a cost-effective way (including decommissioning) makes
it a difficult undertaking. In some ways, nuclear’s goose was cooked by 1992, when the cost of building a 1 GW plant rose by
a factor of 5 (in real terms) from 1972. Before he died, father of the hydrogen bomb Edward Teller’s last paper argued that
nuclear power plants (molten salt reactors, specifically) do not belong on the surface of the earth, and belong underground
instead, to deal with the clean-up and failure, if it happened. And that’s from one of nuclear power’s greatest supporters.

From a broader perspective, the era of cheap oil appears to be over. As shown below in the first chart, almost the entire
future increase in oil supplies projected by the EIA are based on unconventional supplies (tar sands, deep-sea drilling, enhanced
oil recovery, oil shale, etc.), with the word “unconventional” being shorthand for “more expensive”. As for natural gas, as
shown in the second chart, EIA projections assume that rising U.S. shale gas production, with all its uncertainties in terms of
associated costs, will offset declines in almost every other category. It is hard to precisely quantify the speed bump on growth
that this creates for the world, and as things stand right now, deleveraging of household, corporate and sovereign balance
sheets in the US and Europe is a much bigger risk for financial markets. As I write this, Italy has entered an acute state of
distress; its credit default swap spreads are now at levels which prompted bank runs in Greece and Ireland. In the long run, as
we outline return expectations for the future, uncertainties related to energy availability are yet another reason why price-to-
earnings multiples may remain well below their historic averages. A break in the chain of unfulfilled promises from
breakthrough technologies will be needed to alter this view.

Global liquids production
Million barrels per day
120

US dry gas production
Trillion cubic feet per year

History Projections 30
100 , 25
OPEC Conventional 20)

Projections

Net imports

80 20

Shale gas

60 Unconventional BP23aiEET.
Non-associated onshore
40 10 Non-associated offshore
50 Non-OPEC Conventional BERG Tight gas
5
Coalbed methane
0 0 Associated with oil zy
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 2034 :

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. Source: Energy Information Ad ministration.

Absent an unexpected renaissance in cheap and abundant nuclear power, or unexpected solar breakthroughs'', we seem to be in
for another 20-30 years of reliance on fossil fuels. As a result, that’s how our own energy-related investments have been
positioned. Given the risks and returns associated with energy investing, a lot our exposure has been executed through private
investments rather than public markets. Across the full range of energy-related investments in our private equity portfolios,
roughly 70%-80% are related to conventional energy, and the remainder to a variety of renewable strategies.

Conventional energy investments. The majority of our conventional energy investments are “upstream” (exploration and
production of oil and natural gas). The remainder are in midstream assets (pipelines/storage) and services, with very little in
downstream assets (refining). On natural gas, new finds have been rewarding, even with natural gas prices at current (low)
levels, since large major oil and gas companies aggregate proven reserves, and are willing to pay a premium for them given
their long term horizons. On crude oil, many of our investments focus on so-called “renaissance” plays, which entail older,
mostly depleted fields which majors sell as they reshuffle their reserve mix to higher-growth assets. Service companies include
firms providing enhanced oil recovery, fracking and waste-water management. Other servicing investments are related to deep-

"" On Solar Energy. The EIA projects that even after further investment and expansion, commercial (non-residential) solar power will make
up less than 1% of US electricity generation in 2035. Solar power suffers from intermittency, low electricity conversion rates, and the
recognition that real-life installations have higher operating and maintenance expenses than previously thought. A paper presented this year
at the Syracuse Biophysical Economics Conference by an operator of solar plants in Spain estimates that after taking unexpected operating
expenses into account, the energy return on investment for solar is closer to 3 than to 8.

7

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030820
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032531.txt,"From: ee

Sent: 5/8/2017 3:26:51 PM
To: jeevacation@gmail.com
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

a 2 timer?

In a message dated 5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jeevacation@gmail.com writes:
careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Farkas I wrote:
lam seeing little bit | don't think it will turn into romance | am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems
intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came
through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan

Sent from my iPhone

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032531
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031280.txt,"CEO
SEE
WWW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER

MR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER
PUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM

Begin forwarded message:

From: steven hoffenberg

Date: August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT

To: ""Players2 .""

Subject: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF
EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE
BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

C E O STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC/ GET OUR JOBS BACK INC

TO ROGER STONE

CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS CO
VER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BOOK RELEASE

Steven J. Hoffenberg
New York Post Publishing INC.
CEO

WHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS

TOWERSINVESTORS.COM
CEO

SEE

WWW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER
MR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER
PUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM

<2016.08.16 - Draft Letter to Eric Rayman re Epstein Book re Steven Hoffe....docx>
<Ex. A - 2016.08.11 - Hoffenberg Email re Being on Book Writing Team.pdf>

<Ex. B - 1997.03.05 - Sentencing Opinion.pdf>

<Ex. C - 2014.12.16 - Consent Decree re NY Post.pdf>

<Ex. D - 2016.07.05 - Order Dismissing Case.pdf>

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031280
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014646.txt,"US - Facilities, Hospitals and Managed Healthcare Coverage Cluster
BofA Merrill Lynch

Investment rating Company ticker Bloomberg symbol Analyst

BUY
Acadia Healthcare ACHC ACHC US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Aetna Inc AET AET US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
American Renal ARA ARA US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Anthem ANTM ANTM US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Capital Senior Living CSU CSU US Joanna Gajuk
Centene Corporation CNC CNC US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Civitas Solutions CIV CIVIUS Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Envision Healthcare Corp EVHC EVHC US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
HCA HCA HCA US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Mednax MD MD US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Service Corp. International scl SCI US Joanna Gajuk
Surgery Partners, Inc SGRY SGRY US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc. SCAI SCAI US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
UnitedHealth Group UNH UNH US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA

NEUTRAL
DaVita Inc DVA DVAUS Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Tenet Healthcare THC THC US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Universal Health Services UHS UHS US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
WellCare Health Plans, Inc. WCG WCG US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA

UNDERPERFORM
Adeptus ADPT ADPT US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Brookdale Senior Living BKD BKD US Joanna Gajuk
Community Health Systems CYH CYH US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Genesis Healthcare Inc GEN GEN US Joanna Gajuk
HealthSouth HLS HLS US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Kindred Healthcare KND KND US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
LifePoint Health LPNT LPNT US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Molina Healthcare, Inc. MOH MOH US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Select Medical Corp. SEM SEM US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA

RSTR
Team Health TMH TMH US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA
Universal American UAM UAM US Kevin Fischbeck, CFA

me peorlgalinll Top 10 US Ideas Quarterly | 03 January 2017-25

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014646
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027158.txt,"Message: If he could be convinced to keep PEPFAR as is in exchange for cyber i think we
would all win

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/18/17 02:44:41 PM (509150681)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 50C2F487-D322-4BAF-8034-7238AB9B5537

Message: bill needs to focus on american problems first and foremost , if he wants
deals. he can also portray certain worldwide iniativies as buying american drugs
EEC « IT MUST have an american component. donald says it is childish to count the
lives at risk in africa and make believe you are doing something for america. or
pakistan afhhntan, etc. he points to 8500 killed in chicago vs 2500 killed in
afganistan over the past 10 years.

Sender:
Time: 02/18/17 02:45:00 PM (509150700)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

=],

GUID: 64B25B51-38AE-4475-96A4-CO39CFDE6197

Message: I understand

Sender:
Time: 02/18/17 02:45:23 PM (509150723)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 33E9127E-E497-4994-80B3-S5F4DD03DD579

Message: Bills advisory team at fndn all pushing in other direction

Sender: (i

Time: 02/18/17 02:45:37 PM (509150737)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 6D6F3ADB-DAEC-4EB4-8706-586C7077B032

Message: At c3 I can try to reposition Just until I get thrown out

Sender: Po

Time: 02/18/17 02:46:01 PM (509150761)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027158
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015558.txt,"Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 3 of 23

JS:

JS:

JS:

JS:

When you say that the room was hidden, Virginia, how was the room concealed?

It wasn’t like a door that you would normally go into, like some kind of special opening,
you open that and then a little door, so it looks like it’s a little closet so-to-speak, but
when you walk in there, it’s obviously a lot bigger than just a closet. It wasn’t too big,
but it was bigger, you know. It wasn’t a gigantic room, it was just like a small room,
which you know, it probably could fit some shoes in there, it had racks of shoes, boxes,
some sweatshirts neatly folded, and the ceiling to the floor was covered in pornographic
pictures of the girls that he had met.

When you say...

So anyways, that was getting there, and I was introduced to Jeffrey, he was laying naked
on top of the massage table, and obviously for one, I’m a 15 year old girl and seeing him
on the table was weird but, also learning about anatomy and massage, I thought this
would be part of it. So obviously, I thought it was part of the massage program, so I said
ok, this is fine. And, he then instructed me on how to touch the body, Jeffrey’s body,
how to massage him, and for the first hour, it was actually a real massage, maybe not an
hour, maybe like 40 minutes or something, but of something like that _and that’s when he
turned over on the other side and to expose himself fully. So then Ghislaine told me that
she wanted me to undress and began to take off my shirt and skirt, my white uniform
from Mar-A-Lago, she also took off her shirt and got undressed, and so I was there with
just my undies on, and she was completely bare, and made some kind of little flake about
the underwear that I was wearing because it wasn’t my normal sexy girl underwear and
just like, I don’t know, had red hearts on it or something like that; just your normal, you
know, real cute underwear. Anyways, so during all of this I’m kind of like what’s going
on, how do I act, what do I say, I was so afraid of, not afraid or fearful for my life but
_unsure of how all this started and wanting to obtain a profession_ I was so aftaid
thinking about upsetting and disappointing them, I don’t know, it’s a weird situation by
far and I was expected to Lick his nipples, instructed on how to do so by J.E_ and give
him oral sex while he wanted to fondle me, and then at the end, I was told by Ghislaine to
get on top and straddle Jeffrey sexually, and when we were done, we went and had a
shower in the room and Jeffrey told me to wash him up and down, you know with a bar
of soap and make sure he was all cleaned up. And then he took me downstairs and took
me to two of the guards and told John to bring me home. John was the butler at the time.

Let me interrupt you for just a moment there if I could, Virginia. You mentioned as you
were recounting those details that you were 15 years old at the time. What is your date of
birth?

August 9"", 1983

And can you tell us please, as best you’re able to estimate it, what the date was when this
first encounter occurred?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015558
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017149.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

Grandmother.” (Justice Steven Breyer, who succeeded me as Goldberg’s law clerk, now sits in
Goldberg’s old office.)

Before I knew I was to be selected by Justice Goldberg, I interviewed with several of the other
Justices, including John Harlan, an elegant aristocrat whose grandfather had also served on the
Supreme Court. He was impressed with my grades and my law review experience, but he gently
asked me why I hadn’t worked during the summer for one of the “Great Wall Street firms.” I
couldn’t believe that he didn’t know that the “Great Wall Street Firms” were not hiring Jewish
kids from Brooklyn whose ancestors came over from Poland and who hadn’t attended an Ivy
League college. Harlan had himself been the senior partner in one of those firms, and I assumed
that he was familiar with their bigoted hiring policies. I later learned from one of his Jewish law
clerks — he hired many Jews to work for him when he was a judge — that Justice Harlan was
probably oblivious to his firms hiring practices, or at least never really thought about them.
Maybe!

An interesting event marked a transition between my two clerkships. I began working for Justice
Goldberg on August 1, 1963, just __ days before Martin Luther King delivered his “I have a
dream” speech from the steps of the Lincoln Monument. A large rally was planned and I wanted
to attend. But Justice Goldberg told me that Chief Justice Earl Warren did not want members of
the judiciary—which included clerks—to be on the mall that day, because there might be violence
and cases growing out of the violence might come before the courts. I really wanted to hear
Martin Luther King speak and so I asked Judge Bazelon what I should do. “Come with me,” he
proposed. He and another judge were planning to go to the mall and listen from the rear, and off
to the side, in relative anonymity. I went with them and heard—and barely saw—that remarkable
speech (following several long winded speakers representing the groups that had organized the
event.) I never told Justice Goldberg that I had disobeyed the Chief Justice order.

62

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017149
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023054.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 2/1/2019 10:18:27 AM
To: jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@ gmail.com]

Importance: — High

prostittion isastate crime. never before a man in his own house charged with soliciting.! in Florida first
offenders are required to take a sex ed class and get pre trial diversion. no criminal record... there isa
felony solication for the THIRD offense.. A grand jury was held and they found me guilty of one count of
felony solitciation . because there were many girls. . mandatory diversion. sentence..!!!!. a grand jury

. ususally only for capital murder cases. . Recarey and Reiter ( police chief). pulled my garbage for months,
and surveilled the house . letting all the gilrs come and go?! called inthe FBI. they did not like the grand
jury result. and released to the press, the raw sewage of police interviews , ie, no girl was cross examined
EVER. . Unheardof. . - the girls retunred the house multiplie times. for 200 dollars for a rub and

tug. . no sex. . some worked in the locak massage parlors. most in thier mid twenties.. There is only
press stories told my strippers of me buying my girlfiedn from slovakia from her parents . girls under

15. . all made up to get press.._ FBI / puts a task force together title "" operation leap year "" to investigate
my personal massage activity?! nuts. interviews my chiropractor? medical info. . etc.

Ey orked at Mara Lago. Trump knew of it. and came to my house many times during that

period. The testimony of the houseman John allessi confiremed it. He never got a massage.
abe gosman a friend of mine . ran into financial difficulty with assited living homes. . His home was listed
at 45 million dollars. with no takers for months on end . He and J agreed a price of 30m. ( His wife lynn .
ends up going to jail for lying to the bankrupty trustee about her jewelry. ) this is in the summer of 04.. I
became the stalking horse bidder at 36 m. ie if someone bid higher I would receive a fee.
trump buys the house at the telephone auction. only me trump andd his friend pulty the developer.
He quickly puts it on the market for 125 million. serves the purpose of a justification for a high sale later

. and no one will touch it. it is is bough in the name of trump properties IIc... no idea who owns it. or
what else it"" owns "".
Three years later 08 he sells it to Ryboloolev for approx 100 million. He should have had a 50 million plus
capital gain. he tells people and press he spent 20-30 m to fix up. that would justifiy a reduction in captial
gains. key question how did he report the sale , if he did at all on his 08 tax return.
He has no money. when he buys the house. His biz model is putting his name on a real estate development and
gets a fee for using his name. The hotel biz is just that. someone else buys the hotel. hoping to make a profit
from its operation and eventual sale. Trump put his name on it , and get a 2 % fee and maybe a piece of the
profit if any on sale. He touts the project as"" his"" .... just as in his current financial statements on file as
president he lists his"" income"" as the GROSS receipts of the clubs. with no expenses deducted. not his
personal revenue. ie the doral golf club loses money every year. it pays out more than it takes in , but he lists
the revenue as his income. AMAZING.

""Trump’s relationship with Deutsche Bank has not always been amicable; in November 2008, he had difficulty
making payments on a $640 million Deutsch Bank loan — $40 million of which he guaranteed personally — he
took out to finance the construction of the Trump tower in Chicago.”
https://themoscowproject.org/collusion/trump-sues-deutsche-bank-3-billion/

in july , miraculously , rybololev ve buys the house for roughly the same"" 40 plus million dollar"" profit ""

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/08/24/the-russian-diplomat-found-dead-in-his-

ool-in-sudan-is-the-seventh-to-die-since-november/?utm term=.77b0a287fb1l 1

Joe Recarey dies injune of 18. same m.o. ?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023054
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025306.txt,"Laffer Associates Game On [Updated 7/6/2016]

b.) Politics in the States

In the state legislatures, the changes in the Democrat/Republican split have been equally as radical as they are in the U.S.
Congress. Counting all senate members of the various state legislatures in 2009, there were 1,024 Democrats, 889
Republicans and 58 categorized as “other.” (See Table 6 below). But today, the Democrats have only 827 State Senators,
the Republicans 1,088, with 57 categorized as other—this is the very definition of a 180 degree turn around.

In the state houses of representatives in 2009, Democrats had 3,058 members to the Republicans’ tally of 2,334 with 19
“others.” And yet, today, the Republicans control the vast majority of state houses with a grand total of 3,037 house members
to the Democrats’ 2,342 members and 32 “others.” This switch in state legislatures all but assures the Republican control of
redistricting and control of the U.S. House for years to come.

As a final sort of “egg in your beer,” the Democrats had 28 governors to the Republicans’ 22 in 2009. Today there are 31
Republican governors, 18 Democrats and one “other” Bill Walker (I) in Alaska. With solid control of both houses and the
governorships of so many states, a united Republican Party could do almost anything it wants to do if it has the will to do it,
and, at the state level, the party is following through.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025306
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018633.txt,"body is in good shape -- when I'm well-rested and I've eaten healthy food. That, too, is a
position of strength.

In some ways this can become murky. For example: I am rarely interested in one-night
stands. There are a number of reasons for this, but one reason is that -- especially as a
woman -- feeling like a ""slut"" can be scary, difficult cultural territory. And when I don't
feel good about myself, my interest in one-night stands is even lower -- because I know
that dealing with the difficult territory of ""sluthood"" will be harder with low self-esteem.
If I'm feeling happy, strong, competent, valuable, and loved by the world... then one-
night stands can easily be fun. If | doubt my worth, or if I doubt how much I deserve
love... then one-night stands can be self-destructive.

The same goes for relationships with people who don't care about me. If I'm sure that a
guy has no emotional interest in me, then having sex with that guy can be a dangerous
emotional proposition for me, and one that I need to feel strong for. This doesn't always
end up being true -- I've definitely had sexual encounters that left me emotionally
unaffected -- but sometimes it's hard to predict whether I'll want more emotional
investment from a given dude, so I try to keep it in mind for all encounters. (From a
polyamorous perspective, I've noticed that less-emotional sex is often easier to handle
when I'm already in a solid relationship with someone else.)

A couple I know in the local S&M community will sometimes have encounters that
absolutely blow my mind, because they seem so difficult and so psychological. Here is an
example: after the pair was married and child-free for many years, the wife realized that
she might want children after all. This was a problem for her husband, who married her
with the understanding that neither of them wanted kids. It became an ongoing
discussion. Then the husband -- who is also the sadistic, dominant partner -- asked her if
they could have an S&M encounter focused around the topic. She said it was okay.

So, as part of an S&M class that they taught together, the husband used her new feelings
about children to rip into her: during the S&M encounter, he told her that she was
probably too old to have children, that she'd waited too long. He added that she was too
flighty for kids; that she'd be a bad mother. He added that he had always made it clear
that he never wanted kids; that she was stupid for marrying someone who didn't want
kids, and that this problem was her own fault.

I was not present during this class, but I heard about it from some attendees, and it sounds
like it was really intense. He used a genuine and difficult sore spot to put his wife through
a psychological S&M wringer, with her consent.

These days, I feel very tempted towards encounters like that: encounters that can tear me
apart on a deep level, using important weaknesses and insecurities. I've also received
email from other people who want to arrange encounters like that, and who ask my
advice. An obvious problem is that such a relationship could easily slip into abusive
territory.

So I've thought about this a lot, and here's my conclusion: those kind of intense
psychological encounters obey the same maxim as other BDSM -- ""Start from a position
of strength, and seek strength in the end.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018633
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016051.txt,"10.

11.

9.1

9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5

9.6
9.7

9.8
9.9
9.10

10.1
10.2

10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8

11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.6
11.7
11.8
11.9
11.10
11.11
11.12

The Quest for Knowledge 361

Is man-made global warming real, and if already proven
will we ever persuade the US government?

What caused the Tunguska Explosion?

What caused the extinction of the dinosaurs?

Can we predict earthquakes or eruptions?

What caused the reversing of the poles and when will the
next one occur?

What was the origin of life on Earth?

Will we be wiped out by an asteroid before we build a
suitable defense?

Can we grow enough food to feed the planet? '

Can we give clean water to everyone on the planet? ""

Is increasing air travel compatible with survival of the
planet? *

Phil os ophy Nobel Prize in Literature and others

Is there a God?

Where did we come from if we are not made by a god?
And if we were, then where did God come from?

Where do morals come from?

Is there a reality?

Is there life after death?

Do we have free will?

Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?

What is the meaning of life, the Universe and everything,
other than 42?

Conspiracy and Paranormal

Is there anything going on in the Bermuda Triangle?
Do aliens make crop circles? (disproven hoax)
Who was Jack the Ripper?

Can the mind bend spoons? (hoax, admitted)

Does the government suppress UFO existence?
Why was the Mary Celeste abandoned?

Is the Turin Shroud that of Christ?

Do the Abominable Snowman and Sasquatch exist?
Are there ghosts?

Is there a paranormal?

Do aliens live amongst us?

Was there a conspiracy in the shooting of JFK?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016051
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013560.txt,"regime of a schizophrenic break down, critical slowing can be both global and literal
as the patient freezes in catatonic postures.

In the neighborhood of the bifurcation set, big jumps in the stock index, up or
down, are possible under almost the same surrounding conditions. This stock
analyst-humbling phenomenon is called bimodality. Jimmy Swaggert’s Saturdays
were often spent watching the show at naked dance parlors and buying videos at
the pornography shops of Metairie Highway near Schwegmann’s Grocery outside
New Orleans. Sundays found him on national television engaged with infectiously
real, transcendent experiences in the public arena of the pulpit. The ecstatic
congregation was deeply moved by his eloquent and tearful sermons about sin and
salvation. Counter to most suspicions, this is less conscious fakery than the
genuinely felt alternating states intrinsic to the bimodality in neighborhoods of
spiritually unstable, born again transitions.

Similarly, beginning with nearly the same initial values near the boundary of
the bifurcation set, very similar motions lead to dramatically different results. This
counter-intuitive behavior has been called divergence. At UCLA’s Neuropsychiatric
Institute, | interviewed a pair of lively teenage, genetically identical male twins raised
by a loving family in Los Angeles’s Valley. One was president of his high school
class, a Sunday school nursery school volunteer and a Saturday soup server to the
poor. The other twin sold pot and cocaine to support his habit. Deep and potentially
dark mysteries live in these spiritual bifurcation sets. They leave us pondering child
sexual abuse by deeply religious clergy and the massacre by mass suicide of a
New Christian congregation by James Jones. We wonder why it is that
fundamentalists (Jewish, Christian and Muslim) have the most ecstatic and direct
validating experiences of God and do the most shooting and bombing of other
people. In Burt Lancaster's portrayal of bifurcation set dweller, Elmer Gantry,
charismatic believer and exploitative psychopath, were simultaneous and both
credibly real.

Another feature of the occupancy of this bifurcation region in control space is
that the values producing a sudden jump that occur passing through going one way

along the “normal” dimension usually jump back much further along when moving

60

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013560
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029086.txt,"Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European
governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.

* early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics,
wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not
up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.

* cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have
reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to
be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking
webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta),
and other measures.

* publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome,
high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright

A KR RR KR ROR

AAAAAAA please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

David Grosof

oe

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029086
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029007.txt,"From: 
Sent: 9/17/2016 12:44:10 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
I just tried calling you. Call me back. 
Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone 
On Sep 17, 2016, at 8:36 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
i asked, you told me it was ok that you had changed your plans to be able to make it. i will have someone 
check that you really mean what you say, ::)) 
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:33 AM, __________________________ii> wrote: 
I didn't call to confirm because I attributed it to your scatterbrained quality and I just assumed that plans had 
changed and you weren't able to make it. In this civilized society the person being invited doesn't usually have 
to hound the host. And incidentally Woody doesn't feel dressed unless his clothes have holes in them. 
Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone 
On Sep 17, 2016, at 8:24 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
im surprised you didnt call to confirm? :) . re regifting you just have to find people wth the same 
initials. . i thought that woody might like to try something that is super soft and doesnt have holes 
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:04 AM, <________________________ wrote: 
Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on 
it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With 
you I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I 
assumed your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-). 
Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone 
On Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must 
have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two 
should also have some. . 
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:51 AM, < > wrote: 
We already have plans on Sunday as I didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them. 
Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone 
On Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029007 
trumps guys changing their plans . all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a 
bad movie, president trump. down the street from trump hotel. deepak chopra, again, sunday, I know 
you moved krause to tonight.. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029008 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029009 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016045.txt,"Chapter 16

THE QUEST FOR
KNOWLEDGE

Darwin's Beagle

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016045
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018627.txt,"I thought: Are you sure? and You definitely looked affected by it, but it's both unethical
and unwise to question someone else's experience. So I just said, ""You know I don't want
you to do anything you don't want to do. Have you felt pressured by me?”

""No, of course not,” he said.

We talked some more. He ultimately said, ""Look, are you totally satisfied with the sex
we're having?”

""I mean..."" I said. ""It's not the most intense sex I've ever had, but it'll keep getting better.""
""I think we should just be friends,” he said.
""_.. Okay,"" I said. ""Um. Is there anything else you want to talk about?”

Mr. Ambition seemed agitated. He seemed barely able to hold still. ""I've never dated
anyone that I respected like I respect you,” he said. ""Your charisma, your intelligence,
your morality. But... I don't know. I don't feel like we're very authentic with each other. I
don't feel like there's much warmth between us.”

Maybe you're right, | thought. But either way, it's too late now. ""Okay,"" I said. I thought
for a moment. ""I'm sorry,” I added. ""I really wanted this to work out."" For a moment,
tears startled my eyes, but I blinked them back.

""Are you all right?” he asked. He leaned forward. ""Is there anything I can do for you?”

I looked at him and tried to think. I knew I was going to be very upset in maybe fifteen
minutes. He seemed hurt, and I wanted to say something that would comfort him. I
wondered if he wanted me to cry, and beg, and create drama; I wouldn't do that... but
maybe it would help if I asked for something simple.

But I couldn't come up with anything, and I wanted to leave. So after a pause, I said,
""You can let me go home and cry.""

I said it as gently as I could. But Mr. Ambition seemed terribly distressed. ""Ohhh,"" he
said, and screwed up his face. He leapt to his feet. ""I'm sorry,"" he said.

""It's okay,"" I said. ""Is there anything else?”

""Sometimes I think men just aren't capable of the kind of commitment women are,"" Mr.
Ambition said. He sounded defensive, even though I hadn't made any accusations. ""Then
again, you're not like most women.... You're kind of a hardass. You probably have this
problem with a lot of the men you date, where you come across as kind of a hardass....
And to be honest, I don't think men really want to date women as smart as they are.""

Jesus, I thought, you already broke up with me; can't you just let me go? Why do you
have to rip into me like this? | wondered how much of what he was saying was about me,
and how much was him trying to make sense of his own feelings. But even though I felt
sure that he was confused, his words sent an icy spike straight through me. ""J don't think
men really want to date women as smart as they are....""

""I've worked really hard to become less argumentative,"" I said. ""You should have seen
me when I was a teenager.... I don't know if I can tone myself down any more than I

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018627
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013574.txt,"molecular details associated with changes in entropy. These ideas are closer to
applicability in problems of making measures on the behavior of biological systems.
Very generally, in the statistical mechanical context, an increase in entropy means a
decrease in the order, which can be a quantitative observable reflecting a decrease
in predictability and/or knowledge about the system. For example, we can locate the
molecules of the gas more accurately when they are all on one side of the
membrane-partitioned cylinder compared with the situation when the membrane is
suddenly removed. This accompanying increase in ambiguity and decrease in
knowledge in locating a set of gas particles reflects a statistical mechanical view of
increases in entropy. Can anything general be said about the bounds on an
increase in entropy? The statistical developments of the Yale mathematical
physicist, Josiah Willard Gibbs (about 1875), consonant with the logical arguments
of the Greek mathematician, Constantin Caratheodory (about 1910), conclude that
the entropy increase goes to the maximum allowed by the constraints imposed by
or upon the system. A change in likelihood as a probability is a characteristic way to
quantify the entropy change, reflecting an alteration in knowledge or its reciprocal
complement, uncertainty. The system’s entropic uncertainty said more colloquially,

and relevant to the Bell Syndrome’s women of my life, is its capacity for surprise.

A statistical mechanical approach to the total entropy of a bounded set of
molecules in motion involves summing this property across all the participating
molecules. We let N be the number of particles involved. As a problem in Newtonian
mechanics, each of the N particles is represented in 6N dimensional phase space.
That means that each point represents one of the N molecules in the three
dimensions of location space plus three dimensions of motion space as its velocity,
more specifically, the product of mass times velocity called momentum. This adds
up to 6 dimensions of measurement. This so called phase space reconstruction of
the molecules of a gas as individual particles are a daunting task, though fast
computers and new algorithms are making computations from first principles more
generally attainable. Those based on the first principles of short-range repulsion
and long-range weak attraction among particles and the bumper-car collision

74

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013574
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019539.txt,"Hacktivist | 51

from the next node in the network. This scrambling allows messages
to exit the chain of Tor nodes without an easily discoverable IP. By
doing so, it “anomizes” each user of the dark side.

Because of the anonymity it provides, Tor became the software of
choice for individuals and organizations who wanted to hide their
identities. For example, Tor software made possible Silk Road, which
acted as an exchange for drug dealers, assassins, safecrackers, and
prostitutes until it was closed down by the FBI in 2013. It was cre-
ated by Ross Ulbricht, a Libertarian who wore a Ron Paul T-shirt,
as a website where “people could buy anything anonymously, with
no trail whatsoever that led back to them.” (Ulbricht received a life
sentence for running this criminal enterprise in May 2015.)

Tor software was also employed by Private Bradley Manning
(now Chelsea Manning) to transfer some fifty thousand diplomatic
cables and military reports from his laptop to Assange’s WikiLeaks
website. Eventually, Manning was identified by a fellow hacker, con-
victed by a military court for violations of the Espionage Act, and
sentenced to thirty-five years in prison. Tor enabled WikiLeaks to

® publish other secret data, such as material acquired in the theft of ©
Sony’s files, allegedly by the North Korean intelligence service, in
2015. It was the means for guaranteeing anonymity to the IT work-
ers who responded to Assange’s by now famous clarion call to unite.
It allowed system administrators who opposed the “surveillance
state,” as well as other disgruntled employees of government agen-
cies or corporations, to send documents they copied to the WikiLeaks
website without revealing their IP addresses.

Because WikiLeaks did not know the identity of its sources, it
could not be legally compelled to reveal them. “Tor’s importance
to WikiLeaks cannot be overstated,” Assange said in an interview
with Rolling Stone in 2012. Indeed, without the anonymity provided
by its Tor software, WikiLeaks could not have easily entered into a
document-sharing arrangement with major newspapers, including
The Guardian, The New York Times, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, and El
Pats. Through the magic of Tor, these newspapers simply attribute
their sources to WikiLeaks, which, in turn, made Assange a major
force in international journalism.

Ironically, Tor was a creation of U.S. intelligence. In the early years

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 51 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019539
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026320.txt,"From: 
Sent: 8/23/2018 8:25:40 PM 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Trump @ War 
Importance: High 
https ://app. frame lo/presentations/a87092af-cb6a-473b-9241-582c03dbb906 
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026320 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029092.txt,"From: Jeremy Rubin

Sent: 2/4/2017 1:53:41 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Greetings from Japan

Importance: — High
At digital garage

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:00 PM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
where in tokyo are you lecturing? no im in new york

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Jeremy Rubin hii wrote:
Are you around here?

@JeremyRubin

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Jeremy Rubin ~~ =—tsi wrote:
Feb 12th.

@JeremyRubin

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:50 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
how long will you be there?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Jeremy Rubin iii wrote:
Hey Jeffrey,

Thought I'd check in and see what's up on your end.

- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big
bitcoiner) as FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin.
And of course, Thiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear
where your head is at on this matter.

- Last week, | presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most
interesting thing | came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are ""locked"" to
be spent only in the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An
example of something that could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you
agree to donate your money to charity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be
able to release your funds from that agreement until they use their funds not for charity.

- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on
bitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect
to the technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt
that even putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a
hedge fund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029092
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029013.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
CC: lhsoffice 
Subject: Re: Trump 
LHS 
10/2/2016 12:26:35 PM 
jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Importance: High 
Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Oct 2, 2016, at 2:32 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.? 
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM, LHS < > wrote: 
Jeff 
How plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user? 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029013 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029014 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014652.txt,"Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 539 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

pane eee ene een enenenee X
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, :

Plaintiff,
V. 15-cv-07433-RWS
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, :

Defendant. .
ee X

Declaration of Laura A. Menninger in Support of
Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment

I, Laura A. Menninger, declare as follows:

1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed in the State of New York and admitted to
practice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Iam a
member of the law firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., counsel of record for Defendant
Ghislaine Maxwell in this action. I respectfully submit this Declaration in support of
Ms. Maxwell’s Motion for Summary Judgment.’

2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an article by Sharon Churcher
entitled “Prince Andrew and the 17-year-old girl his sex offender flew to Britain to meet him,”

DAILY MAIL, dated March 2, 2011.

' At trial, defendant intends to produce either the custodian of record relevant to any
disputed document or a certification in compliance with either Fed. R. Evid. P. 803 and/or 902.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Apart from deposition testimony, the majority of non-deposition
documents herein were either produced by plaintiff or obtained with releases signed by plaintiff.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014652
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031294.txt,"From: Richard Kahn

Sent: 11/21/2017 1:29:32 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards

Importance: — High

is gratitude paying for IFP or peggy?
please advise
thank you

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

tel

fa

ce

Begin forwarded message:
From: Steven Pfeiffer

Subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
Date: November 20, 2017 at 8:48:00 PM EST

To: Richard Kahn <a >

Hi Richard -

I certainly will. But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this together for the donation.
Jeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied
different information than below.

Please advice how best to proceed.

Best,
Steven

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 20, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Richard Kahn > wrote:

please send info tomorrow as i will be out the remainder of the week
thank you

Richard Kahn

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031294
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032525.txt,"From: Larry Visoski_

Sent: 4/16/2017 3:57:41 PM
To: Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: STT Customs

Importance: — High

Jeffrey

Due to staffing issues,, customs cannot use North Ramp,, only PreClear in main building, .
Trump is suppose to depart 4pm,. Latest 4:30pm

Flight time: 2+25min

Do you want PBI customs or PreClear STT?

Thx
Larry

Sent from my iPhone

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032525
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023040.txt,"---—- End of Forwarded Message

FIG 2 58 IS FAS 2S 2 8 2S FIC 2S 2 5S 5S 2S 2S 2 28 2S 2S 2 2 5S SIS 2S 2S 248 28 IS 2S 2 2 FS IS FIC 2S 2 28 2S 2S 2g 2 8 IS 2S 2S 26 2 2S 2S 2 2 2 3S 2 2 2 2K

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023040
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025312.txt,"The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025312
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023726.txt,"Forthcoming (August 2011) Future Science edited by Max Brockman, Vintage Press, New York.

marginalizing politically incorrect words). Many of today’s social movements, like the
industries they seek to revolutionize, must make big changes quickly—which is best
accomplished by directing efforts upward toward institutions. I call this vertical agitation. The
Santa Fe Reporter listed the top ten commercial water users, in addition to the top ten
households. The first of these offenders, the city of Santa Fe, used 195 times more water than the
number-one household offender. Imagine the relative difference in getting the city to commit to
water-saving techniques as compared to reforming a single household.

Guilt cannot work at the institutional level, since it is evoked by individual scruples,
which vary widely. But shame is not evoked by scruples alone; since it’s a public sentiment, it
also affects reputation, which is important to an institution. At the 2004 meeting of the World
Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, leading CEOs issued a press release about how
corporate brand reputation outranked financial performance as the most important measure of
success. For an example of how shame and reputation interact, consider restaurant hygiene cards,
introduced in 1998 by Los Angeles County as a shaming technique in the interests of public
health. Restaurants were required to display grade cards that corresponded to their most recent
government hygiene inspection. The large grade in the window—A, B, or C—honors restaurants
that value cleanliness most and shames those that value it least. The grade cards have apparently
led to increased customer sensitivity to restaurant hygiene, a 20-percent decrease in county-wide
hospitalizations for food-borne illnesses, and better hygiene scores for county restaurants.'!

Recall that in our early evolution we could gauge cooperation only first-hand. As group
size got bigger, and ancient humans grappled with issues of necessary cooperation, the human

brain became better able to keep track of all the rules and all the people. The need to

""! Zhe, G. and P. Leslie. 2005. The case in support of restaurant hygiene grade cards. Choices 20(2): 97-102.
http://www.stanford.edu/~pleslie/Jin%20and%20Leshie%20Choices%202005 pdf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023726
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024251.txt,"From: Richard Kahn 
Sent: 7/22/2015 5:29:11 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Republicans gird for the Donald Trump debate 
Importance: High 
as you predicted.. 
http ://www.politico com/blo gs/media/2015/07/republicans-gird-for-the-donald-trump-deb ate-
211033.html?ml=t1 5 b#  
Debate Schedule 
August 6, 2015  
9pm ET - Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: Fox News Channel 
Location: Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, OH 
Sponsors: Fox News, facebook 
Moderators: Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly and Chris Wallace 
Rules: Top 10 candidates in an average of 5 national polls 
Candidates: To be determined 
Notes: Fox News has added a candidate forum at 1pm ET the same day for candidates who don't make 
the debate cut 
September 16, 2015  
Reagan Library Republican Debate (Press Release) 
Aired On: CNN and Salem Radio 
Location: Reagan Library in Simi Valley, CA 
Sponsors: Reagan Library Foundation, CNN, Salem Media Group 
Moderators: Jake Tapper, Hugh Hewitt, 
Rules: Split field into Segment B (top 10 candidates) and Segment A (remaining candidates getting at least 1% 
in polls) (Details) 
Candidates: To be determined 
October 28, 2015  
CNBC Republican Debate 
Aired On: CNBC 
Location: University of Colorado in Boulder (Press Release) 
Sponsors: CNBC (Press Release) 
Candidates: To be determined 
November, 2015*  
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: Fox Business Network 
Location: Wisconsin 
Sponsors: Fox Business Network 
Candidates: To be determined 
December 15, 2015  
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: CNN 
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024251 
Sponsors: CNN, Salem Media Group 
Candidates: To be determined 
2016 
January, 2016*  
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: Fox News Channel 
Location: Iowa 
Sponsors: Fox News 
Candidates: To be determined 
February 6, 2016  
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: ABC 
Location: St. Anse1m College in Manchester, New Hampshire 
Sponsors: ABC News, UReview.com (Press Release) 
Candidates: To be determined 
February 13, 2016  
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: CBS 
Location: South Carolina 
Sponsors: CBS 
Candidates: To be determined 
February 26, 2016  
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: NBC and Telemundo 
Location: Texas 
Sponsors: NBC/Telemundo, National Review 
Candidates: To be determined 
March 2016* 
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: Fox News Channel 
Location: TBD 
Sponsors: Fox News 
Candidates: To be determined 
March 10, 2016  
Republican Primary Debate 
Aired On: CNN 
Location: Florida 
Sponsors: CNN, Salem Media Group 
Candidates: To be determined 
*Debate sponsor has not yet named specific date 
Top 10 Media Stocks for 2015 
By Dan Moskowitz March 19, 2015 AAA 
Oat' 
The following list is broken down into Top-Tier Media Stocks and Speculative Media Stocks. It might surprise 
you that some of the names on the latter list aren't on the former list, but there is a simple reason for this, which 
will be revealed below. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024252 
Top-Tier Media Stocks 
Walt Disney 
The Walt Disney Co. (DIS) is one of the strongest brands in the world. It also possesses multiple revenue 
streams and pricing power. Q1 EPS jumped 23% year over year based on record revenue. When a company 
delivers record revenue, that trend doesn't make a sudden U-turn. If there's going to be a turnaround for the 
worse, it will take time to play out, giving you time to exit your position. (For related reading, see: This 
Company Is No Mickey Mouse Operation.) 
CBS 
CBS Corp.'s (CBS) Q4 revenue increased 3% and diluted EPS improved 8%. CBS also announced a $1 billion 
share buyback in the first quarter. This will significantly reduce the share count, which should improve 
earnings. CBS will once again have Thursday Night Football, and it will be the home of Super Bowl 50. It's 
also home to regular-season NFL games, March Madness and The Masters. However, its reach goes well 
beyond sports. 
Comcast 
FY2014 revenue at Comcast Corp. (CMCSA) increased 6.4%. Operating cash flow and EPS improved 6.9% 
and 25%, respectively. Comcast also increased its dividend 11% and announced that $4.25 billion of its $10 
billion share buyback program would take place in 2015. (For more, see: This Company is as Unavoidable as it 
is Unloved.) 
Twenty-First Century Fox 
Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.'s (FOXA) Q2 operating income before depreciation and amortization increased 
12%. Fox studios enjoyed 24 Academy Award nominations in 2015, making it the industry leader. Twenty-First 
Century Fox also recently created the Europe's leading pay TV business. 
Google 
Google Inc. (GOOGL) is known as more of a technology company than a media company, but its YouTube 
segment consumes approximately 15% of all broadband traffic in the United States and Canada (only Netflix, 
Inc. (NFLX) is higher at 35%). Google also makes this list because of its $62.63 billion in cash, which means it 
can enter any business it pleases. If it chooses to expand its media presence, then it would likely steal share 
from some of the current industry leaders. (For related reading, see: How Google's Self-Driving Car Will 
Change Everything.) 
Speculative Media Stocks 
Charter Communications 
Q4 revenue jumped 9.9% at Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) thanks to higher customer penetration on 
Internet, video, and commercial businesses. Another positive is that Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A) recently 
increased its position in CHTR by adding 1.2 million shares. CHTR now represents 1.35% of the fund's 
portfolio. The reason CHTR is on the speculative list is a lack of profitability. 
Discovery Communications 
Differentiation is the key here thanks to Discovery Communications, Inc.'s (DISCA) success with docudramas. 
In FY2014, revenue increased 13%, adjusted earnings per diluted share improved 13%, free cash flow increased 
2%, and $1.4 billion worth of stock was repurchased. The biggest risks here are a challenging U.S. market and 
currency headwinds. It should also be pointed out that there is an 11% short position on the stock. (For related 
reading, see: A Breakdown of Stock Buybacks.) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024253 
Viacom 
MTV, VH1, CMT, BET, Nickelodeon, Nick Jr, Comedy Central, TV Land, SPIKE, and more. Do these sound 
like brands that are likely to suffer? No. Viacom, Inc. (VIA) is a profitable company that pays a small dividend. 
On the other hand, a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.88 isn't comforting. 
Time Warner 
Time Warner Inc. (TWX) has 165 channels across 200 countries. This includes HBO. In FY2014, revenue 
increased 3%. That's not spectacular, but adjusted EPS jumped 18%, which now represents six consecutive 
years of adjusted EPS growth in the high teens. Time Warner also returned $6.6 billion to shareholders via 
dividends and buybacks throughout the year. Over the long haul, cable companies will have a difficult time 
competing against streaming services, but all is okay for right now. 
Scripps Networks Interactive 
Among Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc.'s (SNI) properties are Home and Garden Television, Food Network, 
Travel Channel, DIY Network, Cooking Channel and Great American Country. These are strong brands. Strong 
enough that Scripps Networks expects FY2015 revenue to increase approximately 4%. The company also 
expects selling, general, and administrative expenses to come in between flat and down 2%. Either way, it's a 
positive when revenue is outpacing SG&A expenses. Furthermore, Scripps Networks has announced that it's 
adding $1 billion to its share buyback program and increasing its dividend by 15%. The risk here is the stock's 
sensitivity to broader market corrections. (For a look back to 2009, see: Scripps Network Interactive Worth a  
Look.) 
Performance Comparisons 
Another reason why some stocks made the top list and others did not is performance. If a stock can't appreciate 
in a bull market, then how would you expect it to perform when the trend reverses? Capital preservation should 
be the number one priority for a savvy investor. Below are total return numbers for each company as of 
3/18/2015). 
1-Year 	3-Year 	5-Year 	10-Year 
DIS 	33.09% 	36.87% 	27.03% 	15.19% 
CBS 	-3.95% 	26.94% 	23.19% 	12.56% 
CMCSA 	19.26% 	27.62% 	23.13% 	13.40% 
FOXA 	6.46% 	26.99% 	24.13% 	8.83% 
GOOGL 	-6.61% 	21.87% 	14.84% 	20.18% 
CHTR 	50.27% 	143.56% 	140.36% 	n/a 
DISCA 	-25.98% 	8.93% 	13.74% 	n/a 
VIA 	-20.33% 	11.19% 	17.28% 	n/a 
TWX 	37.35% 	38.08% 	25.34% 	9.86% 
SNI 	10.10% 	15.26% 	12.24% 	n/a 
The Bottom Line 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024254 
The Top-Tier Media Stocks have outperformed Speculative Media Stocks over the past three years (for the most 
part). Therefore, you should strongly consider the first set of stocks listed above. While it's entirely possible 
they all underperform in 2015 if the market falters, these are elite names that are highly likely to be around for a 
long time. Even if the worst occurs, you will have an opportunity to add more to your position at cheaper prices. 
(For related reading, see: Buying Facebook Stock, A Beginner's Guide.) 
Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/031915/top-10-media-stocks-
2015.asp#ixzz3gdqLDgWm  
Follow us: gInvestopedia on Twitter  
Richard Kahn 
HBRK Associates Inc. 
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor 
New York, NY 10022 
tel), 
fa 
cell 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 024255 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025474.txt,"Message: That Alabama abortion bill will not bring lots of women to your side

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 03:14:58 AM (579694498)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 9A6F67B6-FO2E-4718-AF46-CD7FF792CB5

£

Gl

Message: Though not my skill set.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 04:24:37 AM (579698677)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 386F64E1-1134-4C16-BB04-99274F257A71

Message: Deblasio. Presidential bid to be announced.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 04:24:49 AM (579698689)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: SF9D9BSD-A723-46B1-8AF3-4FD5AA276673

Message: Isn't it nice having know this months ago

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 06:21:50 AM (579705710)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: C4E0356A-B8F8-4264-9DEA-564C8BC13F65

Message: Your girl is Paris

Sender: ii

Time: 05/16/19 08:37:54 AM (579713874)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 90CE5539-9E2B-4626-A5D5-FOoERFF6ODC77A

Message: What!

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025474
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026534.txt,"References

10

ll

12

13

14

15

16

R. L. Trivers, Quarterly review of biology pp. 35-57 (1971).
J. W. Friedman, The Review of Economic Studies 38, 1 (1971).
R. Axelrod, W. D. Hamilton, Science 211, 1390 (1981).

D. Fudenberg, E. Maskin, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society pp.
533-554 (1986).

D. Fudenberg, E. Maskin, The American Economic Review 80, 274 (1990).
K. G. Binmore, L. Samuelson, Journal of economic theory 57, 278 (1992).
M. A. Nowak, K. Sigmund, Nature 355, 250 (1992).

M. Nowak, K. Sigmund, et al., Nature 364, 56 (1993).

R. J. Aumann, L. S. Shapley, Long-term competitiona game-theoretic analysis

(Springer, 1994).
M. A. Nowak, K. Sigmund, Nature 393, 573 (1998).

M. A. Nowak, K. Sigmund, Nature 437, 1291 (2005).

M. A. Nowak, science 314, 1560 (2006).

H. Ohtsuki, Y. Iwasa, Journal of Theoretical Biology 239, 435 (2006).

K. Sigmund, The calculus of selfishness (Princeton University Press, 2010).

M. J. Osborne, An introduction to game theory (Oxford University Press, USA, 2003).

P. D. Taylor, L. B. Jonker, Mathematical biosciences 40, 145 (1978).

14

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026534
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020666.txt,"From:

Sent: 3/7/2019 4:21:42 PM
To: Jeffery Edwards [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories

Importance: — High

Jeff/Warren: Go directly to photo #9. Terry

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: DeMilked <noreply+feedprox oogle.com>
Date: March 7, 2019 at 2:48:52 PM GMT+1

To:
Subject: DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories
Reply-To:

I .

DeMilked - 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories

e 30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories

e This Chinese Blogger Uses Makeup To Transform Herself Into Anyone She Wants

e 49 Short Wholesome Comics About Daily Struggles

e This 16-Year-Old Boy Knew He Wanted To Be An Artist Since He Was Just 2 Years Old

e 23 Ordinary Slavic People That Look Just Like Famous Celebrities

30 Ordinary Photos With Amazing Backstories
Posted: 07 Mar 2019 05:15 AM PST

Sometimes certain pictures have unique significant meanings to us even though others would see them as a simple
snapshot. That old faded picture of you sitting on the beach? Maybe it was the first time you ever saw the sea. A 20-year-
old picture with a childhood friend at their birthday party? Maybe it’s the last picture of you together before you drifted
apart. Bored Panda has compiled a list of photos that look ordinary at first glance but become something special once you

hear the stories behind them. Check them out in the gallery below!

h/t: Bored Panda

#1 Tadeusz Zytkiewicz Holding A Picture Of Himself

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020666
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024049.txt,"The Fund Managers expect this combination of positive market conditions to remain favorable
for generating attractive returns in the biopharmaceutical sector for the foreseeable future.
Although industry returns have been characterized by inconsistency and generally associated
with long timelines, a small number of top investors have been able to consistently build
portfolios that outperform the venture capital industry and relevant public market indices.
There is no substitute for experience in this sector, and the New Leaf team brings one of the
most powerful and proven combinations of team, strategy, and track record to investing in this
dynamic sector, and is positioned well for continued success in NLV-III.

INFORMATION CONVERGENCE INVESTMENT STRATEGY

The Fund Managers believe that U.S. is rapidly approaching a fiscal crisis that will be driven
largely by rising healthcare expenditures and the exponential increase in future healthcare
liabilities. This looming threat is a major driver behind Information Convergence (“I.C.”), the
second of the two primary focus areas in NLV-III. Governments and the private sector alike are
being forced to significantly increase the efficiency of the healthcare system, and consequently
are beginning to invest heavily in technologies that reduce cost and improve the quality of care.
New technology solutions are emerging from the intersection of a diverse, yet interconnected
set of technologies that define Information Convergence, including cloud storage, mobile
computing, wireless communications, web-delivered software, big data analytics, diagnostics
and sensors.

1.C. companies are integrating these technologies in ways that more cost effectively prevent,
diagnose, and treat disease. These applications and products can be highly valued by
addressing costly inefficiencies within the healthcare system. The Fund Managers believe I.C.
will play an enabling role in many of the initiatives that will form the core of healthcare reform,
including the transformation of healthcare reimbursement models from volume to value-based,
and that this will be a major area of opportunity for investors for the foreseeable future.

Within LC. the Fund will seek opportunities that target some of the largest inefficiencies in the
healthcare system. These include: (1) inefficiency in delivery of care and excess administrative
costs; (2) unnecessary services and missed opportunities for prevention; and (3) inflated pricing
and fraud. Coming out of these large, identified problem areas are a number of discrete
investable themes. These are the primary target of New Leaf’s investment strategy in I.C. and
they include the following:

Problem Area: Inefficient Delivery and Excess Administrative Costs

e Investment Theme - Operational & Care Delivery Efficiency: Process improvement and
optimization can only occur when data is available to identify the problems and
measure the impact of solutions. With shrinking margins and shifting value objectives,
healthcare providers are under pressure to understand and improve their businesses
and operations. Technologies that allow the collection and analysis of relevant data on
the efficiency of care-delivery will be foundational to this evolution. AwarePoint (NLV-
II) delivers enterprise awareness solutions for the hospital and other healthcare facilities,
is an example of a company fitting this theme.

38 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024049
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021578.txt,"ev. 12-19-06) © Accomplishment Report @ Date Prepared oe of

‘Squad supervisor approval (Accomplishment must be reported and loaded into : Date Loaded / &

(please initial) ISRAA within 30 days from date of accomplishment) Date Loader’s Initials |

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

File Number {. Used, but did not help 3. Helped, substantially
o E-MMN-[oKvocz 2. Helped, minimally 4, Absolutely essential
ial For Sub. invest. Assist. by other FO(s) indicate A, B, C, D for corresponding FO
Bankruptey Fraud | a Rate FO IAT Rate FO IA Rate FO 1A Rate FO IAT

iT T
[ARB Somer [|| Phto cover | xin it ss) |
| [eensenon | rovoreon | Mics Neo Foal |
| | feusunvrisc | | [seach Waren] Mcisswoo-tocal|
| | [evsurstan |_| Show Money 7 ERT Asst. |_|
cro ricsse| | [soca | |
[en9.Tepe x | MM svetTeom | [Misav-rre |_|
BD cus asst | IM Tech. creaui,| [Poor |_|
| [Es Porcheso| li) Prone Tot Rec] MMFLMon.-1To |_|
Finowinre [| [uco-Groupt | fron tang rcst |_|
[tab Ok Eran] | —[vco-crevp | Non FBILop=x| |_|

A. Complaint / Information/ Indictment F. Conviction J. Civil Rico Matters Date:

(CiFederal ([JLocat [International []Federal []Local [7 Intemational Also complete “Section G”
Complaint Date: Conviction Dates Other Civil Matters Date:

Computer Fraud/Abuse O
Corruption of Public Official
Money Laundering

Sub Invest Asst by FO(s)

Asst, FO(s)
A B. CG. Dz.

Viet-Witn Coor
10 Wanted Flyer

OFC/CID

Check if Civil Rico Complaint [1] Subject Description Code *{—~j Judgment...
Judicial Outcome - °x

Amount $
Suspension: Years Months

Information Date: For 6F, G, H-Include Agency Code
(Felony or ( Misdemeanor
[Plea or 0 Trial
B, Locate / Arrest State:_________ Judicial District: _____. , K. Administrative Sanction Date:,

[Federal [Local [] Internationat- ° Subject Description Code
G. U.S, Code Violation Type: Length:

Subject Priority A OB [1c Required for sections A, B, F and J se H Siepemien  & | Paanaient

Indictment Date:

LocateDate: | (Federal Only) Debarment or
Arrest Date: Title Section # Counts Injunction ——_Year. Months
(1) Subject Resisted Arrest err nel _ L. Asset Seizure Date:.

(1 Subject Arrested was Armed Asset Forfeiture Date:
———— ee TT CATS # Mandatory

Cc. Summons Date: Circle below one of the three asset forfeiture:
(O Federat [[] Local Admin, Civil Judicial, or Criminal

Do not indicate $ value in Section D
D. Recovery / Restitution / PELP X o Rat indicate Salven Section

‘ H. Sentence Date:
Federal Local International
a Fiat O O fone! Sentence Type: M. Acquittal/ Dismissal/ Pretrial Diversion
ecovery Date: f ' '
Code * v Amount $
Code*__s vy =Amount $
Restitution Date:
(Court Ordered = [[)] Pretrial Diversion Probation: = Years______ Months__ Drug Code * -
Code * Y Amount $ ' Fines: $e te ode
PELP Date: . Do not indicate $ in Section D
Cede * ¥ Amount $——______. |. Disruption/Dismantlement: ~“
E, Hostages(s) Released Date:______ Disruption Date: O. Child Victim Information
Released by: [1 Terrorist [1] Other Child located / identified Date: by 20 oX¥
Dismantlement Date:

Number of Hostages: ___ Wu i D id
Completion of FD-51a Side 2 Mandatory mang . [Beoease

ey

(Circle one) Date:

In Jail: Years... Months,

Suspended: Years___.___._ Months____ N. Drug Seizures “ Date:

P. Subject Information - Required for all blocks excluding block D (Recovery/PELP), blocks E, f, Land N
| | || Race* | Sex | Date of Birth Social Security No. (if available)

Leth { related to an LCN, Asian Organized Cama (AOC), Italtan Organized Cnme ({0C), Russian/Eastern European, Caribbean, or Nigerian Organized Crime Group -
Complete FD-518a, Side 1 Blocks A-E mandatory, F-H as appropriate,

Subject relatad to an OC/Drug organization, a VCMO Program National Gang Slralegy targel group, or a VCMO Program National Priority Initiative targel group «
Complete FO-515a, Side 1 Blocks A-C only,

x Additional information may be added by attaching another form or a plain sheet of paper for additional entries. pedal Norolneete
« See codes on reverse side.
Y Requires that an explanation be attached and loaded into ISRAA for recovery over $1 m and PELP over $5 m, disruption, dismantlement, and drug seizures.

YE- WU-106062-) 74

b6
b7Cc
b7E

b6
b7C

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021578
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030834.txt,"BRAND PUBLISHING This is sponsered content. (7) |

VILLAGIO RESERVE
Southeast
Florida's 11 Southeast Florida's 11 best public golf courses

best pub

Local Business Search

Sin [Search Local Businesses Su

Ft Lauderdale Auto Sales
Ft Lauderdale Banking

Ft Lauderdale Beauty Care
Ft Lauderdale Dentists
Ft Lauderdale Florists
Ft Lauderdale Insurance
Ft Lauderdale Lawyers
Ft Lauderdale Movers

Ft Lauderdale Physicians
Ft Lauderdale Restaurants

Ft Lauderdale Real Estate

Discover and Review More Local Businesses »

Sign Up for the Weekly Ads Newsletter
enter your email subscribe |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030834
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016525.txt,"Page 16 of 42
103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *875

The mandatory prosecution duty, known as the ""legality principle,"" is itself a safeguard against selective underenforcement due
to bias or favoritism. It is primarily an anti-discrimination injunction, intended to ensure that prosecutors treat like cases alike,
rather than a mandate to ensure public safety and order through full enforcement. !°> Administrative and judicial enforceability
of that duty is intended to ensure its effectiveness.

2. Oversight of Declination Decisions in England and Wales

106 and its largest criminal

The United Kingdom was an E.U. member state when the victim's right Directive was issued,
[*876] justice system - the combined jurisdictions of England and Wales - provides several grounds on which victims or other
aggrieved parties may obtain both administrative and judicial review of non-prosecution decisions. Yet the reasons for this
relate foremost to public rather than private interests: ""a decision not to prosecute, especially in circumstances where it is
believed or asserted that the decision is or may be erroneous, can affect public confidence in the integrity and competence of

the criminal justice system."" 107

In line with other E.U. member states, English victims can seek administrative review within the Crown Prosecution Service.
The process appears to be meaningful; in recent years, between seven and thirteen percent of prosecution decisions challenged
in this way have been reversed. !°8 Moreover, noncharging decisions are also subject to judicial review - a policy rarely seen
in other common law jurisdictions. !°? The standard is deferential, but English courts do periodically overturn non-prosecution
decisions after evaluating them against written standards in the Code for Crown Prosecutors and other guidelines. !!° English

111

courts have disapproved of decisions not to prosecute upon finding they were based on an unlawful policy or were found to

be [*877] ""perverse"" under a general reasonableness standard. !!? And in particular contrast to U.S. law with regard to lethal
force by police, English judges give special scrutiny to cases that arise from deaths in state custody, which by their nature raise

the specter of prosecutorial favoritism toward fellow law enforcement officials. !!3

Employers' Insolvency (1987); Comm. of Ministers, Council of Eur., Recommendation No. R (85) 11 of the Committee of Ministers to
Members States on the Position of the Victim in the Framework of Criminal Law and Procedure (1985). For analysis of Directive 2012/29 as
well as Council of Europe recommendations, see Buczma, supra note 61, at 242-48. In Germany, victims can initiate a private prosecution for
certain minor offenses, and for more serious offenses may take a formal role as accessory prosecutors with rights to participate in proceedings
and to be heard before charges are dismissed. See Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure], §§374-94, translation at
hittps://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_ stpo/englisch_stpo.html (describing rights of privateklage); id. §§153, 395-402 (describing
rights of nebenklager); see also id.§§403-406c (describing compensation); id. § 172 (describing victim's right to seek court order to compel
public prosecution); Michael Bohlander, Principles of German Criminal Procedure 25, 64 (2012).

7% This describes, for example, the German system that allows private parties to act as accessory prosecutors alongside public prosecutors.
See Strafprozessordnung [StPO] [Code of Criminal Procedure],§§153, 395-402 (describing rights of nebenklager).

4 See, e.g., Commonwealth Dir. of Pub. Prosecutions, supra note 71 (reporting three private prosecutions in federal courts in 2014-15).

75 By the end of the nineteenth century, state and federal justice systems were firmly committed to the principle that prosecution is an
exclusive power of public officials in which private victims have no role or standing. See Malley v. Lane, 115 A. 674, 676 (Conn. 1921); cf.
Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973) (""[A] citizen lacks standing to contest the policies of the prosecuting authority when he
himself is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution... . In American jurisprudence at least, a private citizen lacks a judicially
cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another."").

76 See Manikis, supra note 66.

77 See Jacoby, supra note 70, at 5-7; Jack M. Kress, Progress and Prosecution, 423 Annals Am. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 99, 100 (1976); Allen
Steinberg, From Private Prosecution to Plea Bargaining: Criminal Prosecution, the District Attorney, and American Legal History, 30 Crime
& Deling. 568, 571-72 (1984) (finding that private prosecutions predominated in the colonies). In 1704, Connecticut established what was
probably the first public prosecutor's office. See Jacoby, supra note 70, at 17; Kress, supra, at 103. When Blackstone described criminal law
as predominantly directed at public wrongs, he did so in the context of a late eighteenth century justice system in which private prosecutions
were common. See 4 William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England: Book the Fourth 5-6 (1795).

78 See Jacoby, supra note 70, at 23 (concluding that after 1789 “for the first half-century at least"" the public prosecutor was ""clearly a minor
actor in the court's structure"" with a more judicial than executive role); Stephanie A.J. Dangel, Note, Is Prosecution a Core Executive
Function? Morrison v. Olson and the Framers' Intent, 99 Yale LJ. 1069, 1073 (1990) (""First, colonial attorneys general and district attorneys
performed non-prosecutorial tasks ... ."" ); see also Steinberg, supra note 77, at 577 (noting public prosecutor's duties included responsibility

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016525
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011865.txt,"/ BARAK / 108

mosques on the Haram, and would not become a catalyst, or in this case a pretext,
for violence.

Yet the revisionist history about our peace efforts left Clinton not just
frustrated, but genuinely puzzled. What the hell were these people talking about, he
asked me. Why were they missing the forest for the trees. “The true story of Camp
David,” he said, “was that for the first time in the history of the conflict, you and I,
the Prime Minister of Israel and the President of the United States, placed on the
table a proposal, based on Resolutions 242 and 338, very close to the Palestinian
demands. And Arafat refused to accept it as a basis of negotiations, walked out of
the room, and deliberately turned to terrorism.” All the rest, President Clinton said,
was gossip.

All of it was now irrelevant, too. His parameters were off the table. Palestinian
violence against Israelis was getting ever deadlier. And I was out of politics. When
I delivered my final remarks to a Labor Party meeting, I was asked whether I was
leaving politics for good. I replied that I would always remain a member of Labor.
But I saw my role as a bit like when I'd left the army. “I’m a reserve officer,” I
said, adding that I hoped I would not be called back to duty any time soon.

I had been Prime Minister for only 21 months. But I'd been in politics for six
years, and in uniform for nearly thirty-six: in public service for more than four
decades. Now, suddenly, I was a private citizen. And for a few years, I actually
stayed that way.

394
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011865
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022071.txt,"James PaTTERSON

ell-connected group of Spanish families — including But if Ana had
ly—had invested with Drysdale. already see thz

hundreds of millions of dollars. } paaintainatha
| who helped se

Avery W
members of Spain's royal fami
Those investors stood to lose
And Ana’s father was one of those investors.

What Ana wanted from Jeffrey Epstein was

ing her father’s money.
“My father, he's done something stupid,” she told him. |
A Spanish accent. A Brooklyn accent. They blended well :
d Ana was so very lovely.
It turned out that Epstein was willing to help.
“Something stupid, you see, with the money. The family i i q District of New
A scheme. He knew some of a Barce He wasa

t do you call it?
him, And now the money is gone.” 7 he was buildin;

help in recover- G3
_ wome :
£ n he'd cu
A whole other kir
: ag Ones that n

together, an
Andrew Levanc

money. Some—wha

the people, but they lied to
_ of Drysdale ex

Epstein bringir

People who knew Jeffrey Epstein recall that he was bad off after j _ Epstein came tc
his exit or ouster — whatever it was—from Bear Stearns. Mov- —
ing from couch to couch for a while. Sleeping in his lawyer's f
offices before settling down in an apartment in the Solow: Tower, ©
on East 66th Street. : 2

It's a bit hard to believe. After
with a good deal of money. But Epstein’s lifestyle was expensive.
He was a man on the make then, and Ana was still in her wen

The woman

Levander to

himself, was as!
hunt for the mo
_ In effect, Dc

tea dfalls. And «

all, Epstein left Bear Stearns

ties, plying her craft at the Actors Studio—the New York City See were less
theater institution that Marlon Brando, Robert De Niro, Ja ) the US atton

Nicholson, and Jane Fonda had all been members of. ad violated tk

Epstein told Ana that he’d formed a company, Inter
Assets Group.

To Ana, this sounded very
small operation that Epstein wa

natio nal

impressive. In fact, IAG
5 running out of his apartmé

102

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022071
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013212.txt,"296 16 AGI Preschool

Intelligence Type Test
Linguistic

write a set of instructions
speak on a subject

edit a written piece or work
write a speech

commentate on an event

apply positive or negative ’spin’ to astory

Logical-

Mathematical perform arithmetic calculations

create a process to measure something
analyse how a machine works

create a process

devise a strategy to achieve an aim
assess the value of a proposition

Musical

perform a musical piece
sing a song

review a musical work

coach someone to play a musical instrument

Bodily-Kinesthetic

juggle

demonstrate a sports technique

flip a beer-mat

create a mime to explain something
toss a pancake

fly a kite

Table 16.4: Prototypical preschool intelligence assessment tasks, Part 1

This testing protocol abstracts away from the particularities of any one teacher or student,
and focuses on effectiveness of communication in a human context rather than according to
formalized criteria. This is very much in the spirit of how assessment takes place in human
preschools (with the exception of the copying aspect): formal exams are rarely given in preschool,
but pragmatic, socially-embedded assessments are regularly made.

By including the copying aspect, more rigorous statistical assessments can be made regarding
efficacy of different approaches for a given AGI design, independent of past teaching experiences.
The multiple copies may, depending on the AGI system design, then be able to be reintegrated,
and further “learning” be done by higher-order cognitive systems in the AGI that integrate the
disparate experiences of the multiple copies.

This kind of parallel learning is different from both sequential learning that humans do, and
parallel presences of a single copy of an AGI (such as in multiple chat rooms type experiments).
All three approaches are worthy of study, to determine under what circumstances, and with
which AGI designs, one is more successful than another.

It is also worth observing how this test could be tweaked to yield a test of generalization
ability. After passing the above, the AGI could then be given a description of a new task

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013212
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032853.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2/19/2016 5:46:24 PM 
To: Michael Wolff 
Subject: Re: Trump 
Importance: High 
Im here today, ehud barak at 1 , would you like to join at 2? 
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Michael Wolff wrote: 
NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider 
preempting. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032853 
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613.txt,"Page 10 of 31
104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *73
Because crime victims lack a right to appointed counsel, many victims have difficulty litigating the scope of their rights. ©
But in a few cases, victims have been able to secure counsel to argue that they have rights in the criminal justice process during
the investigation of federal crimes. When those cases have reached the issue of whether the CVRA applies before charges have
been filed, courts have uniformly agreed with the victims’ position.

Perhaps the leading case to date to assess this question is the Fifth Circuit's decision in In re Dean. °° There, a wealthy
corporate criminal defendant reached a generous plea deal with the Government - a deal that the Government filed for approval
with the district court without conferring with the victims. Citing procedural rights under the CVRA, the victims requested that
the trial court reject the plea agreement. °* The District Court for the Southern District of Texas specifically concluded that
victims’ CVRA rights could apply during the investigation of the crime: ""There are clearly rights under the CVRA that apply
before any prosecution is underway."" © The district court concluded, however, that the Government had not violated the
CVRA because it had secured judicial permission to dispense with notification to victims.

The victims sought appellate review in the Fifth Circuit. ©’ There, the court concurred with the district court that CVRA rights
apply before trial. Unlike the district court, however, it held that the Government had violated the victims' rights:

The district court acknowledged that ""there are clearly rights under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution is underway.""
Logically, this includes the CVRA's establishment of victims’ ""reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the
Government."" At least in the posture of this case (and we do not speculate on the [*74] applicability to other situations), the
government should have fashioned a reasonable way to inform the victims of the likelihood of criminal charges and to ascertain
the victims’ views on the possible details of a plea bargain. ©

The Fifth Circuit then remanded the matter to the district court to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the
victims’ rights. ©

The Fifth Circuit's decision in Dean has been cited favorably in four recent district court decisions, which provides further

79 victims of a

support for the conclusion that the CVRA applies before charges have been filed. In United States v. Rubin,
federal securities fraud argued that they had CVRA rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the

specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights

® John W. Gillis & Douglas E. Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in the
Courts, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 689, 693 (2002).

6 527 F.3d 391 (Sth Cir. 2008). Other aspects of the case are discussed in Paul G. Cassell & Steven Joffee, The Crime Victims' Expanding
Role in a System of Public Prosecution: A Response to the Critics of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 105 Nw. U_L. Rev. Colloguy 164, 172-76

(2011).

64 In re Dean, 527 F.3d at 392.

65 United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at 11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008).
6 Td. at 1, 19.
*7 For discussion of the difficulties crime victims face to obtain appellate review of their claims, see generally Paul G. Cassell, Protecting

Crime Victims in Federal Appellate Courts: The Need to Broadly Construe the Crime Victims' Rights Act's Mandamus Provision, 87 Denv.
U_L. Rev. 599 (2010).

68 In re Dean, 527 F.3d at 394 (internal citations omitted).

6 Jd. at 396. On remand, the district court held additional hearings in which the victims participated, satisfying their CVRA rights. See
United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 660 (S.D. Tex. 2009).

7 558 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024061.txt,"General Partner’s return obligation set forth in the preceding
sentence; provided, however, that in no event shall any carry
recipient be required to return to the Fund an amount in excess
of the aggregate distributions made to it that are attributable to
the General Partner’s “carried interest” less tax distributions
with respect thereto.

Management Fee: The Fund will enter into a management agreement with New
Leaf Venture Partners, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability
company, or an affiliate thereof (the “Management Company”)
to provide management and administrative services to the
Fund.

The Fund will pay the Management Company an annual
management fee (the “Management Fee”) equal to 2.5% per
annum of Commitments, payable in advance on a quarterly
basis. For each successive twelve-month period beginning on
the first day of the fiscal quarter following the date which is the
fourth anniversary of the Final Closing Date, the percentage
used in calculating the annual Management Fee shall be
determined by multiplying the percentage used to determine
the Management Fee for the prior twelve-month period by 88%;
provided, however, in no event shall such percentage be
reduced below 1.35%per annum.

Commitment, Break-Up and 100% of all directors’ fees, consulting fees, commitment fees,

Monitoring Fees: monitoring fees, investment banking, transaction or break-up
fees or other remuneration (excluding directors’ fees and
options for service on the board of a publicly-traded portfolio
company) paid by the Fund’s portfolio companies to the
General Partner, the Management Company or the Managers
(“Portfolio Company Remuneration”), net of expenses, will be
treated as an offset to the Management Fee; provided, however,
that the Management Fee shall not be reduced below zero. Any
reimbursement of the General Partner, the Management
Company or the Managers for out-of-pocket expenses incurred
on behalf of a portfolio company will not offset the
Management Fee.

50 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024061
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015202.txt,"car wash,” involving, as one veteran swinger portrays it, “a lot of naked
bodies and some serious rubbing.”

But the ABC regulations on Attire and Conduct—behavior “deemed
contrary to public welfare and morals, and therefore no on-sale license
shall be held at any premises where such conduct or acts are
permitted” —includes this clause as a no-no: “To encourage or permit
any person on the licensed premises to touch, caress or fondle the breasts,
buttocks, anus or genitals of any other person.” The Wyndham chickens
out, the massage clinic is canceled, the money is refunded, Lifestyles will
sue the hotel for breach of contract, and next year’ s convention will be
held in Las Vegas in 1998.

A lawyer, standing on the border of cynicism, suggests, “Just buy a
town in Mexico and buy off all the officials.”

In the previous year, 1996, the convention was held at the Town &
Country Hotel in San Diego (for the fourth time), but two ABC officers
claimed that they witnessed oral copulation in the convention hall, and the
hotel’ s liquor license was suspended for five days, hence Lifestyle’ s
move to Palm Springs this year. Lately, ABC has been spreading its
particular brand of paranoia in Los Angeles, where the agency has raided

gay, black and Latino bars in Los Angeles and in Hermosa Beach, where it

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015202
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt,"From: Zubair Khan

Sent: 10/13/2016 1:39:13 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: US Election Update

Importance: — High

Hi Jeffrey,

Since the start of 2nd US Presidential Election debate till now, we have processed 3.1 million tweets.

Here is the performance of candidates:

1. Donald Trump 11.80% (Positive), 15.66% (Neutral), 72.54% (Negative)
2. Hillary Clinton 40.70% (Positive), 19.09% (Neutral), 40.21% (Negative)

Winning Chances:

1. Clinton 72%
2. Trump 28%

Winning chances in US States:

1. Clinton: New York (84%), California (75%), North Carolina (64%), Florida (75%), Washington (52%), Ohio

(96%), New Jersey (70%)
2. Trump: Texas (66%)

Regards,
Zubair Khan

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021550.txt,"FD-350 (Rev. 5-8-81)

(Mount Clipping in Space Below)

Rich man fought the law
— and he mostly won

Two years after a grand jury
indicted him on a felony charge of
solicitation of prostitution, Jeffrey
Epstein finally admitted that he
luréd a teenage girl to his $8.5 mil-
lion, 13,000-square-foot Palm Beach
mansion for sex. A week ago, the
‘55-year-old investment banker be-
gan serving 18 months in jail.

But that plea deal — guilty of
felony solicitation of prostitution
and procuring a person under the
age of 18 for prostitution — does
not account for all five of the girls,
one as young as 14, who alleged that

‘Epstein sexually abused them. And
why is Epstein serving his
term in the overcrowded

Palm Beach County Jail | 38°“:

and not a state prison,
where inmates are sent if
their sentences are longer
than one year?

The slow, dissatisfy-
ing resolution of the case
sends a message to the
public that there’s a dif
ferent system of justice for
the wealthy who hire high-powered
lawyers. Epstein’s legal team includ-
ed West Palm Beach defense attor-
ney Jack Goldberger, Harvard Law
School Professor Alan Dershowitz,
who defended O.J. Simpson against
murder charges, and Kenneth
Starr, the prosecutor who pursued
then-President Bill Clinton for lying
about sex with young women.

Palm Beach police spent 11
months investigating Epstein be-
fore State Attorney Barry Krischer
sent the case to a grand jury, in-
stead of charging Epstein so the
man who once boasted of accepting
only billionaire clients could face a
trial. The police had taken a high
school transcript, class schedules
and phone messages from Epstein’s

Why ts Jeffrey Epstein in
jail, and not prison?

home that showed he knew the girls
were underage. Yet Mr. Krischer
was more swayed by Epstein’s law-
yers, who attempted to impugn the
girls’ character by showing they
had chatted on myspace.com about
smoking marijuana and drinking.
He should have let a jury decide
whether the victims — and Epstein
— were credible.

Ultimately, one charge against

the age of one victim, and
the plea agreement left
Epstein labeled a sex of
fender. With that additional
charge, if Epstein had been

could have been sentenced
to anything from probation
to 15 years in prison, Assis-
tant State Attorney Lanna
Belohlavek said, adding that the
recommended guideline sentence
was 21 months.

Epstein also won’t have to cer
tify to the court that he is receiv-
ing counseling, typically required
of sex offenders, because he has
a private psychiatrist. But without
court supervision, who will ensure
Epstein is in fact being treated?

The plea deal also drops a federal
investigation of Epstein. If a federal

investigation was warranted, how —

|

Epstein finally reflected .

Date:
Edition:

Character:
or

Indexing:

(Indicate page, name of
newspaper, city and state.)

07072008
Palm Beach Post

Title: Rich man fought the law and he mostly won

|| Classification: 31 E-MM-108062
Submitting Office: Miami (PB2)

convicted at a trial, he .

does dropping it before completion

benefit the public?

Epstein preyed on girls and de-
nied it. For three years, his wealth
and the influence of his lawyers
bought him the protection the state
attorney owed to the victims.

8/E- HH- 10f002- sug

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021550

"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027602.txt,"Message: ???

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/18/19 03:10:38 AM (574596638)
Flags: 1150981

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 4C4682E6

5

IEF 7-43DE-8697-C312705B9A49

Message: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/18/saudi-crown-prince-allegedly
stripped-of-some-authority

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/19/19 04:45:35 AM (574688735)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F51C875B-0D69-418D-A4AF-2FC4C37E28BE

Message: in slovakia, the left woman NGO no experienc , leading to be president

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/19/19 04:45:44 AM (574688744)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 29810749-3FAE-489F-87E8-C979R62F9R29

ee

Message: miro amazed

Time: 03/19/19 05:02:39 AM (574689759)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: SDOI1FS5SAB-6DEC-4600-9F48-D4CDFD59827D

Message: Miro should be in hunt

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/19/19 05:03:23 AM (574689803)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 83EF3193-AD40-47D9-8412-DF461067E474

Message: hes not a honey badger

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027602
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020896.txt,"USA Per Capita Spending on Healthcare =

3x OECD Average

Annual Per Capita Expenditure* on Health Among OECD Countries, 2007
WG00D - — - mn 3 a a

= Public @ Private

Annual Per Capita Health Spending ($)
PF
Ay
o
oS
So

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

$0

Korea
Japan
Greece
UK
lreland
Belgium

Turkey
Czech Republic

Mexico
Poland
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Portugal

New Zealand
OECD average
Finland
Iceland
Sweden
Australia
Denmark
Netherlands
Germany
France
Austria
Canada
Switzerland
Norway
Luxembourg

Note: OECD data adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity. *Total expenditure on health measures the final consumption of health goods and services (i.e.,

current health expenditure) plus capital investment in healthcare infrastructure. This includes spending by both public and private sources (including

households) on medical services and goods, public health and prevention programs, and administration. Excluded are health-related expenditures such as

K Pp training, research, and environmental health. Source: OECD.
www.kpcb.com

USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 109

USA Spending on Healthcare as % of GDP =

2x OECD Average

Total Healthcare Spending as % of GDP Health Among OECD Countries, 2007

MEI ne oe em en oe te
o
a
5 = Public m Private
ro)
se 12% --------------------- pM. --------------------
w 7 oa
@ : 3
fo7) : 5
£ i
ZB 8% -----------o SEL EREDEEPRGPELT EEF
o l a
[os i id
7) tae
i a i
= ‘a:
s 4% OE SUTTER
i a:
~~ i
° i:
E HE
0% t
>Aos Te D ox ec OMX © DOIG yw Hw re} x = S&S > y |<
SSSPEPTCL SEES Eo eSRESEsSEESSEF? Bla
ERXSSeeZ aS FoR QHemissczanagevg9tlezacun sea Sid
SOLVo0h8SealSe wn 10858“ 9GtEDECSETSE
FS"". ESEO°T : i335 SL2OfSeo § it see
ex : it “5 ama Ox
4 ae o S
Ss : 5 z i?)
—_l : &

Note: OECD data adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity. *Total expenditure on health measures the final consumption of health goods and services (i.e., current
health expenditure) plus capital investment in healthcare infrastructure. This includes spending by both public and private sources (including households) on
medical services and goods, public health and prevention programs, and administration. Excluded are health-related expenditures such as training, research, and

KP environmental health. Source: OECD.
a USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 110

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020896
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024742.txt,"ACKRELL
CAPITAL

Cannabis Investment Report | December 2017

Colorado

Colorado implemented a medical law in 2000 and a recreational law in 2014. The following graph
shows the impact of Colorado’s recreational law on the overall market in the state.

State-Legal Cannabis Market: Colorado

$1,600

[) Medical

$1,400 Ml Recreational

$1,200
$1,000

$800

($ millions)

$600

$400

$200

$0

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E

Source: Ackrell Capital

Washington

Washington implemented a medical law in 1998 and a recreational law in July 2014, and folded its
medical law into its recreational law in 2017. The following graph shows the impact of these laws on
the overall market in the state.

State-Legal Cannabis Market: Washington
$4,000, $929

$900 lem Medical
$800 Mm Recreational $768

\

$700 ral

300 $235 amy S28
= |

$200
- x lv EZ
s |

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E

Source: Ackrell Capital

106 © 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024742
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031112.txt,"From: Sultan Bin Sulayem 
Sent: 6/1/2018 10:54:16 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: Steve Bannon's clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Fareed Zakaria GPS ‹> 
Date: June 2, 2018 at 2:26:50 AM GMT+4 
To: Fareed Zakaria GPS 
Subject: Steve Bannon's clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms 
Please scroll down or click here to read my latest Washington Post column. 
Steve Bannon's clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms 
By Fareed Zakaria, Friday, June 1, 2018 
ROME -- The Republican Party faces dim prospects in the midterm elections. But it doesn't have to be that way, says 
Stephen K. Bannon, the chief ideologist of the populist wave that brought Donald Trump into the White House. ""If the 
Republicans continue on the path they are on,"" Bannon told me Thursday, ""they will lose 40 seats in the House and 
President Trump will be impeached."" He presented an alternative that strikes me as clever, and it's a strategy that 
Trump himself seems to instinctively get. 
Bannon was in Rome to learn from and provide support to the unusual coalition of populists and nationalists who 
together won half the vote in Italy's recent elections and are now set to govern. Bannon sees that sort of coalition — 
mixing left and right, old and young — as his goal for the United States. ""Europe is about a year ahead of the United 
States.... You see populist-nationalist movements with reform [here].... You could begin to see the elements of 
Bernie Sanders coupled with the Trump movement that really becomes a dominant political force in American politics."" 
(This column draws on an on-air interview he did with me for CNN, as well as a subsequent conversation.) 
The Republican Party's strategy, for now, appears to be to make the midterm elections a series of local contests focusing 
on the tax cut and the healthy economy. Bannon views this as fundamentally misguided. ""You have to nationalize the 
election,"" he said. Bannon understands that voters are moved from the gut more than through a wonky analysis of 
taxes. ""This is going to be an emotional [election] — you're either with [House Minority leader] Nancy Pelosi or you're 
with Donald Trump.... Trump's second presidential race will be on Nov. 6 of this year."" 
Bannon is most focused on the issue of immigration because it hits both the heart and the head. ""Immigration is about 
not just sovereignty, it's about jobs."" He believes that the Trump coalition can attract up to a third of Sanders supporters 
who see trade and immigration as having created unfair competition for jobs, particularly for working-class blacks and 
Hispanics. He advocates appealing directly to those voters, saying, ""You're not going to be able to take the Hispanic and 
black community from the STEM system in grammar school to our best engineering schools ... to the great jobs in 
Silicon Valley, unless you start to limit these H-1B visas and this unfair competition ... from East Asia and South Asia."" 
Now this strikes me as entirely wrong. The reason that not enough Hispanic and black students end up in Silicon Valley 
has much more to do with a broken education system, particularly for poorer kids, than the modest number of skilled 
Asian immigrants who get work visas. The most likely result of limiting these visas is that talented immigrants will simply 
go elsewhere — Canada, Britain, Australia — and start successful companies there. And, in fact, there is lots of evidence 
this is already happening. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031112 
But Bannon is right that this is a brilliant electoral strategy. The idea of greater immigration controls has an undeniable 
mainstream appeal. The Democratic Party is too far to the left on many of these issues, embracing concepts such as 
sanctuary cities, which only reinforces its image as a party that is more concerned with race, identity and 
multiculturalism than the rule of law. 
Where Bannon is analytic and historical, Trump is instinctive. But the president appears to see the situation similarly. I 
wrote last month that Trump would try to fight the midterm elections on immigration and added, ""Do not be surprised if 
Trump also picks a few fights with black athletes."" In recent weeks, the president has labeled immigrant gang members 
""animals"" and suggested that football players who silently protest police violence against blacks should leave the 
country. 
Bannon thinks Trump is just getting started in nationalizing the election around immigration. He predicted the next 
major battle would be over the proposed wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. ""The wall is not just totemic. The wall is 
absolutely central to his program.... As we come up on Sept. 30, if [Congress's] appropriations bill does not include 
spending to fully build his wall ... I believe he will shut down the government."" 
Sadly, but not surprisingly, Bannon doesn't think the fighting and the rancor in the United States are going away any 
time soon. The ""battle between nationalists and globalists is at the fundamental roots of what America is, what America 
will be,"" he said. ""This is very healthy, and ... I think this is going to go on for a long time.... We've got a lot more 
fighting and a lot more scar tissue to go over."" 
You can watch my CNN special ""The Steve Bannon Interview"" on Friday at 9 pm ET and Sunday at 10 am ET. 
NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the Dubai World Group disclaimer see http://www.dubaiworld.ae/email disclaimer 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031113 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019277.txt,"Freedom House

Putin's Foreign Admirers

“Putin decides what he wants to do, and he
does it in half a day, right? He decided he had
to go to their parliament—he went to their
parliament, he got permission in 15 min-
utes... He makes a decision and he executes
it, quickly. Then everybody reacts. That's what
you calla leader.”

—Rudolph Giuliani, former New York City mayor

“In my opinion, Putin is right on these is-
sues.... Obviously, he may be wrong about
many things, but he has taken a stand to pro-
tect his nation’s children from the damaging
effects of any gay and lesbian agenda.”

—Franklin Graham, American Christian evangelist

“Putin is certainly a pure democrat, but with
an authoritarian style. Russia is a great state.
The president has been endowed with great
power by the constitution... Putin tries to
keep Russian interests from his perspective.”

—Heinz-Christian Strache, leader of Freedom Party of
Austria

parties supported Russian interests on a select group
of issues. The most reliable pro-Russian party was
Dutch politician Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom,
followed by France's National Front, Italy's Northern
League, the Swedish Democrats, and UKIP.?°

Putin and other Kremlin officials speak of Russia as a
successful example of interreligious harmony, boast
of government policies to ensure fair treatment for
Russias large Muslim population, and denounce
those who brought down Yanukovych’s government in
Ukraine as fascists and pogromists. Yet when it comes
to potential allies in Europe, it makes no difference to
the Kremlin whether a party has views that are racist,
anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, or even openly fascist.
Russia welcomes the support of parties like Jobbik,
with its history of anti-Semitism and contempt for
Hungary's Romany population, and has no qualms
about right-wing parties that speak of Muslims as
criminals and rapists.

“AS an operator, but not as a human being, |
would say Putin [is the most admirable world
leader]. The way he played the whole Syria
thing. Brilliant.”

—Nigel Farage, former leader of UK Independence Party

“| admire his cool head. Because there is a
cold war being waged against him by the EU
at the behest of the United States, which is
defending its own interests. | admire that he
has managed to restore pride and content-
ment to a great nation that had been humili-
ated and persecuted for 70 years.”

—Marine Le Pen, leader of France's National Front

“Between Putin and [Italian prime minister
Matteo] Renzi | will always choose Putin. |
wish Putin tomorrow morning became chair-
man of the Council of Ministers of Italy... Pun-
ishment against Russia [through sanctions] is
a stupid measure, which will cost us 5 billion
euros. If there is a part of Ukraine, which
wants to be Russia, | don’t see why not.”

—Matteo Salvini, national secretary of Italy's Northern
League

For Russia, the payoff from this strategy is a network
of parties that identify with the Kremlin's hatred of
liberal values, support Russia on critical foreign policy
issues, and praise Putin as a strong leader. While some
of these parties are still marginal forces in domestic
politics, a growing number are regarded as legitimate
contenders, especially since an uncontrolled influx of
refugees and an increase in terrorist attacks dented
public trust in mainstream parties. Even if Russia
remains unpopular in most European countries, the
fact that increasingly influential political figures laud
Putin for his energy, decisiveness, and eagerness to
challenge liberal orthodoxies is regarded as a gain for
Moscow. As these parties acquire a share of govern-
ing power in EU states, the prospects for a recognition
of the Crimea annexation and the abandonment of
economic sanctions improve significantly.

The benefit for European far-right parties is less clear.
Though they claim to be champions of national sov-

www.freedomhouse.org

43

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019277
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022059.txt,"James PATTERSON

his father moved out of Brooklyn. Seymour and Paula took Gary
in. Often they referred to him as their third son. “Paula was a
wonderful mother and homemaker,” Grossberg remembers,
“despite the fact that she had a full-time job.”

Epstein, as a kid, was “chubby, with curly hair and a high,
‘hee-hee’ kind of laugh,” Beverly Donatelli recalls.* Beverly was
two years older than Epstein, but thanks to his precocious tal-
ents, which allowed him to skip two grades, they graduated from
Brooklyn's Lafayette High School together, in 1969.

“He was advanced,” Beverly remembers. “He tutored my girl-
friend and myself in the summer. He taught me geometry in just
two months.”

When Beverly thinks of Epstein now, she recalls gentler times—
long strolls down the Coney Island boardwalk, roller-coaster rides,
stolen kisses. “That last year in school, I think he kind of loved me,”
she says. “One night on the beach he kissed me. In fact, our history
teacher made up a mock wedding invitation for Jeffrey and myself
to show to the class. That seems pretty inappropriate now. But back

then, we all thought it was funny. Jews and the Italians, that was
pretty much who went to Lafayette High School. They didn't social-
ize that much. And though my mother was crazy about him, she

told me Jewish boys don't marry Italians.”

Through the haze of several decades, Beverly remembers ©
Epstein as a kindhearted boy and something of a prodigy—4 =

gifted young pianist as well as a math whiz.

“| was talking to my girlfriends the other day,” she says.

—————————

* Beverly Donatelli’s name, some identify
changed.

ing details, and dialogue have been

“There is nothing but r
the reason I went to col
Beverly lost contact
after Epstein’s fiftieth bi
“He had a photo o
noticed it at his birthd<
bet she has a big ass no
his home on 71st Stree
the same Jeffrey. A gent
The two never did s
pathizes with her high :
“I feel so bad for I
liked him.”

Gary Grossberg was a ye
class as Epstein’s kid
remains very friendly, t.
frey in some time. Both

‘Jeffrey's a brilliant
generous.”

Grossberg says he’s

| Florida.” As he sees it,

| was hanging around wit

Grossberg wonders,

4 cial contributed to his e

“H =
€ was a diamond it

_ People recognized Jeffri

:: tfor recognizing oppc

i
a

:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022059
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029985.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
7/1/2016 11:05:09 AM 
jeff epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Fw: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016 
Importance: High 
Jeff: see top story. Below 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
From: New York Post <email@nypost.com> 
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:01:36 -0400 (EDT) 
To: <_______________________________ 
Subject: New York Post Morning Digest - July 1, 2016 
JULY 1, 2016 
Owner of iconic Brooklyn pizza 
joint gunned down in hit job 
The co-owner of iconic Brooklyn pizzeria L&B 
Spumoni Gardens was shot to death in a targeted 
hit outside his Brooklyn home Thursday night. 
Police found the slumped body of Louis Barbati, 
61, at his home on 12th Avenue in Dyker 
Heights at about 7 p.m. with gunshot wounds to 
ggar• 
This Week's Most Popular Stories 
Clinton White House was den of coke, 
mistresses. ex-Secret Service officer 
40:7145 
CNN staff revolts over Corey Lewandowski hire 
Naked man takes over Times Square, screams 
about Donald Trump 
'Don't do this': Dad begs wife who fatally shot 
daughters 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029985 
the head and chest, according to law-
enforcement sources. The assassin, described as 
a white man in his 30s wearing a black hoodie, 
approached Barbati, who was returning from the 
Bensonhurst pizzeria, which was once at the 
center of a Mafia extortion plot over a sto... 
A dog brought this multimillionaire and a 
homeless woman together 
Ayesha Curry snaps after troll's Kyrie Irving 
photoshop 
Disgraced ex-UN official's death 'conveniently 
timed' 
Marisa Tomei's parents and John Lennon's son still fighting 
over a tree 
What started as a neighbor-vs.-neighbor tiff over a tree... 
Derrick Rose is in full-on recruiting mode for Eric Gordon 
ORLANDO, Fla. — Derrick Rose's words have already resonated with 
center Joakim Noah. Now Rose is trying to sway shooting guard Eric 
Gordon to reunite ... 
Mom of overdosed daughter calls gun-toting trio 'heroes' 
GLEN LYON, Pa. — The mother of a woman whose overdose death in 
New York City spurred a rescue attempt by three people arrested with a 
cache of weapons... 
Mets GM: Help will have to come from within organization 
Help for the struggling Mets will have to come from within — from 
injured players getting healthy to improvements made by currently 
scuffling starters... 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029986 
Naked Times Square guy is actually a super-hot model 
He's not just crazy — he's crazy hot. The 21-year-old man ... 
These 'Hamilton' fans have the ultimate buyers' remorse 
For many lucky theatergoers who scored ""Hamilton"" tickets, July 9 will 
be the gloomiest day ever. That's when Lin-Manuel Miranda ends his 
run in th... 
US-led airstrike among deadliest in war against ISIS 
U.S.-led coalition aircraft waged a series of deadly strikes against 
Islamic ... 
MORE NEWS 
Range Rover thieves targeting Greenwich millionaires 
There's a ""Range Rover ring"" of thieves targeting the hedge funders and 
other wealthy residents of Greenwich, Conn. The latest victims of the 
alleged Range Rover crime wave are designer Tommy Hilfi... 
MORE PAGE SIX 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029987 
Phil Jackson, Joakim Noah meet with possible $70M deal 
on table 
ORLANDO, Fla. — Joakim Noah will meet Friday afternoon with his 
hometown team in New York, and barring unforeseen circumstances, he 
is expected to fulfill his childhood dream of playing for the Knicks. 
Dialogue on contract numbers began officially betw... 
MORE SPORTS 
Owner of iconic Brooklyn pizza joint gunned down in hit job 
The co-owner of iconic Brooklyn pizzeria L&B Spumoni Gardens was 
shot to death in a targeted hit outside his Brooklyn home Thursday 
night. Police found the slumped body of Louis Barbati, 61, at his home 
on 12th Avenue in Dyker Heights at about 7 p.... 
MORE METRO 
These 'Hamilton' fans have the ultimate buyers' remorse 
For many lucky theatergoers who scored ""Hamilton"" tickets, July 9 will 
be the gloomiest day ever. That's when Lin-Manuel Miranda ends his 
run in the show. So will co-stars Phillipa Soo and Tony winner ... 
MORE ENTERTAINMENT 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029988 
Lionsgate buys Starz for $4.4 billion 
Lionsgate, the film studio behind the ""Hunger Games"" movie franchise, 
said on Thursday it would buy premium TV network Starz for $4.4 
billion in cash and stock. Th... 
MORE BUSINESS 
Hillary Clinton's health plan would kill Joe Biden's cancer 
'moonshot' 
Vice President Joe Biden launched the ""Cancer Moonshot"" — his 
mission to cure cancer — this week, just as Hillary Clinton was 
shooting it down, along with the hopes of millions of cancer patients. 
Biden's plan is to streamline decisions made by the FDA... 
MORE OPINION 
Taylor Swift's style changes with every guy she dates 
Taylor Swift's relationship status isn't the only thing that's evolving 
these days. After splitting with boyfriend Calvin Harris after 15 months 
of dating, the ""Wildest Dreams"" singer quickly rebounded with Tom 
Hiddleston ... 
MORE FASHION 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029989 
I make thousands by showing off my naked 490-pound body 
She sure has a lot to love. Bobbi-Jo Westley, 43, of Pennsylvania, has 
eight-foot hips, weighs 490 pounds and a fan club of men who call 
themselves ""chubby chasers"" and can't get e... 
MORE LIVING 
Chain of private islands off Connecticut coast up for sale 
Who needs the Caribbean when you can buy your own private 
archipelago off the Connecticut coast. While some wealthy couples 
collect art, Christine and Edmund Stoecklein used their millions to buy a 
major portfolio of private islands. Now their secret s... 
MORE REAL ESTATE 
The ruthless, punishing life of a Facebook employee 
After leaving Goldman Sachs in 2008, Antonio Garcia Martinez struck 
out for Silicon Valley, founding a startup and seguing to Facebook, 
where he worked as a product manager from 2011 to 2013. His memoir 
L4 
MORE TECH 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029990 
Sumner Redstone's signature says it all 
The battle for control of Viacom resumes Thursday in a small 
Massachusetts courtroom 210 miles from the media giant's Manhattan 
headquarters. Judge George Phelan is expected to decide whether a 
move by certain Viacom board members to ... 
MORE MEDIA 
HOROSCOPES I TODAY'S COVER I COLUMNISTS I REALTOR.COM 
THE EMAIL ADDRESS FOR YOUR SUBSCRIPTION IS 
EMAIL PREFERENCES I UNSUBSCRIBE I HOME DELIVERY I SUBSCRIBE 
New York Post 
1211 Avenue of the Americas 
New York, NY 10036 
Copyright 2014 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved 
Privacy I Terms of Use I Your Ad Choices 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029991 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011695.txt,"as a good time to settle down in a way that would be impossible if I stayed on in
the upper reaches of the military. Perhaps do something more academic, in a
university or a policy think-tank.

For the first time, politics had some appeal, too, though I didn’t say this to
him. At that point, I had no idea how, or even whether, I might get involved.
But since my appearance on Moked, others seemed to assume it might happen at
some stage. Out of nowhere, a leading political journalist, Hanan Kristal, had
written a story in 1986 purporting to predict the successors to Israel’s political
old guard: Peres and Rabin in Labor, Begin and Shamir in the Likud. It
appeared in the newspaper Hadashot. The paper ran side-by-side photos of the
ostensible future leaders, doctored to look older, who Hanan predicted would go
head-to-head in the election of 1996, a decade away. One was Israel’s
ambassador to the UN and a protégé of Misha Arens: Bibi Netanyahu. The other
was me.

Rabin listened with patience to my obviously settled intention to leave, but
remained firm that I should stay and become Dan’s deputy. In the end, I agreed
I’d think things over and that we’d talk in a week’s time. In the meantime, I
went to see two veteran generals who had found themselves in a similar
situation, mentioned as possible chiefs of staff but never chosen: Arik and Ezer
Weizman. I saw Arik on his farm in the Negev. He was obviously enjoying his
extraordinary political rehabilitation since the Lebanon war. His expanding girth
was settled into a sofa in the living room. I filled him in on my conversation
with Rabin. “I’m considering leaving,” I said. “It just seems like a long time to
wait, even if I do get the job after Dan. There’s a lot else I want to do in life.”
Arik was probably the general most experienced in being denied the chief-of-
staff's office. On at least two occasions, he might reasonably have been
considered. But in a career littered with tense encounters with his superiors, it
never happened. “You should stay on,” he said. You’re not that old. It'll
probably be good for you, and the army, to be deputy and then chief.” The only
further advice he gave me was to do all I could formally to commit Yitzhak to
making me Dan’s successor after his term ended.

I visited Ezer at his home in the seaside town of Caesarea. We sat on the
terrace, with Ezer’s gangly frame draped over one of the cane chairs. “Ehud, if
you stay, do you think you have a good chance of being the next ramatkal,” he
asked. I said that while nothing could be certain, I thought there was a good
chance. He replied without hesitation: “Then stay.” He’d come close to the top
job, he told me. On the eve of the Six-Day War, when Rabin had collapsed

224
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011695
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029904.txt,"Epstein's procurers, a 20-year-old local woman named Haley Robson, who was paid $200
for every teenaged girl she brought to Jeffrey, was cooperating with police, telling them she
was like ""Heidi Fleiss."" They obtained statements from five of Epstein’s young victims, who

said they'd been paid $200 to $300 to engage in various sex acts with ...

Continue reading...

SUBSCRIPTION INFO

This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on
the HumanEvents.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If
this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.

Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions..

Or Send postal mail to:
Ann Coulter Unsubscribe

P.O. Box 9660, Arlington, VA 22219

* Copyright Human Events and its Content Providers.

All rights reserved.

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029904
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026155.txt,"Appendix 1 -1Q17 Balance Sheet

€ mn
Ukrsibbank Ukrgasbank Raiffeisen Bank
Aval
31/3/1 31/3/16 31/3/1 31/3/16 31/3/1 31/3/16
7 7 7

Assets
Cash and cash 73 68 124 88 466 362
equivalents, banking

metals
Accounts in NBU and 471 561 260 229 253 358
other banks

Derivatives 0 0 0 0 0 0
Loans and advances to 663 128 727 716} 1,005 985
customers
Trading securities 0 0 13 14 36 28
Investment securities 137 136 972 704 0 0
available-for-sale

Investment securities 0 0 0 35 0 0
held-to-maturity
Securities at fair value 0 0 0 0 93 74
through profit or loss

Fixed and intangible 45 45 52 53 82 83
assets

Investment property 1 1 2 2 4 4
Investments in 0 0 0 0 2 2
subsidiaries
Assets held-for-sale 0 0 38 40 2 2
DTA and inc. tax prepay. 35 38 2 3 28 39
Other financial and non- 16 20 11 13 20 33
financial assets
Total Assets 1,440 1,596| 2,201 1,897| 1,992 1,970
Liabilities

Due to NBU and other 0 1 54 59 18 22
banks

Derivatives 0 2 0 1 0 0
Customer accounts 1,162 1,282 1,956 1,625) 1,547 1,561

22

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026155
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012642.txt,"poy

associated with the treatment of Jane.

28. Jane Doe’s Father experienced and will continue to experience great mental anguish,

pain and suffering from the time that Defendant’s tortious conduct occurred.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Father demands judgment for loss of consortium

damages, costs and such other and further relief as this Court deems proper.

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action.

Dated: January a 2008

HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A.

Respectfully submitted,

HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

18205 Biscayne Blvd.

Suite 2218

Miami, Florida 33160

Tel: 305-931-2200
Fax: 305-931-0877

By:

M. Herman
jiferman@bhermanlaw.com
Florida Bar No. 521647

Stuart S. Mermelstein
smermelstein@hermanlaw.com
Florida Bar No. 947245

Adam D. Horowitz

Florida Bar No. 376980

ahorowitz@hermaniaw.com

www. hermanlaw.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012642
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020390.txt,"238

CHAPTER FIVE

Contractor

L

10.

11.

12.

13.

“Much of what I saw in Geneva...”-- Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Ewen
MacAskill, “Edward Snowden: the whistleblower behind the NSA surveillance
revelations,” Guardian, June 9, 2013

“This “free pass,” as ...”—Author’s Interview with Tyler Drumheller

. “So the guy with whom the CIA...:-- Morell. Op.cit. p. 284

. “His initial job for Dell...”.—“The Snowden Saga,” Vanity Fair, op, cit.

The information about Lindsay comes from her postings on Instagram and her blog
“LS Journey.” https://twitter.com/Isjourneys. The information about her and
Snowden’s travel to Mount Fuji and other places in Japan come from the Little Red
Ninja blog written by Jennie Chamberlin. https://www.facebook.com/Little-Red-Ninja-
214045021941347/timeline/

. “He attempted to get a ...”.—Mark Hosenball, “NSA contractor hired Snowden,”

Reuters, June 11, 2013.

. “System code-named EPIC SHELTER,” --“The Snowden Saga,” Vanity Fair, op, cit.

“Since most of the classified...” —Author’s interview with Source A

“Spotted a major flaw....”—Snowden interview with Bamford in 2014. See Bamford
Wired, op.cit.

“T actually recommended they. ..”—ibid.

“Snowden made a ten day...’”—Shane Harris, “What Was Edward Snowden Doing in
India?” Foreign Policy, Jan 13, 2014. Also, Shilpa Phadnis, “Edward Snowden
sharpened his hacking skills in Delhi.” Zimes of India, December 4, 2013

““Tt is a dead end...” Author’s interview with a former Booz Allen employee, who
requested anonymity. (Hereinafter referred to as Source F.)

“Shaded by a Sakura tree...:-- The description of Snowden’s life in Maryland come
entirely from Lindsay Mill’s Internet postings. “LS Journey.”
https://twitter.com/Isjourneys.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020390
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019511.txt,"Secret Agent | 23

him to its information technology school for six months to train as
a communications officer, not a spy. After completing his training,
he was dispatched to the CIA station in Geneva. He worked there
for the next two years as one of dozens of information technologists
servicing the CIA’s communication channels in Switzerland. He was
stationed there, according to Swiss registry records, under his own
name from March 2007 to February 2009. He was identified as a U.S.
State Department employee in Geneva because Switzerland does
not allow any intelligence officers to operate in its country. Offi-
cially, he was attached to the permanent U.S. mission to the United
Nations, which employed hundreds of U.S. government functionar-
ies in Switzerland. It was a thin cover; the Swiss government was
aware that the CIA maintained its base in Geneva and posted its
employees at the U.S. mission.

Although Snowden would claim in a video he made in Hong
Kong that he had served as a “senior adviser for the Central Intelli-
gence Agency,” he was merely a telecommunications support officer,
or TSO in CIA parlance, which was a junior-level job at the CIA.

© He worked as part of a team of information technologists under the ©
supervision of senior CIA officers, according to a former CIA officer
in Geneva. The job of these TSOs was to protect the security of the
CIA’s computer systems through which the CIA station in Geneva
sent and received its secret communications.

As far as is known, Snowden made very few friends at the eight-
hundred-person mission. The only person to have publicly reported
knowing him in Geneva during this period is Mavanee Anderson, a
young and attractive summer intern at the U.S. mission from May
to August 2007. She described befriending Snowden, who, according
to her, said that he was in the CIA and also demonstrated to her his
martial arts skills. She later recalled in interviews that he was “a bit”
prone to brooding and voiced growing dissatisfaction with the CIA.

The job in Geneva did have its benefits, however. It provided him
with a generous housing and travel allowance. In many ways, it was
the “cushy government job” he had said he was seeking in his Inter-
net posts. He rented a four-room apartment and had his girlfriend,
Lindsay Mills, now twenty-one, join him there.

According to his posts on the Ars Technica website, he took full

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 23 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019511
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014233.txt,"| [IMPORTANT MESSAGE |
ron 4K - EPSTEIN

; Times] pi
pa nCof Fre €)
OF

| eons Pt PP AMTG 2

7 =
= =

4

| [IMPORTANT MESSAGE | |

EOR BARA < DA

a

DATE .

M

Terr

AGHU

ke CHE FUL EC HY |
[TELEPHONED [wy fPLEASECAL ||
fcameroseevou | [lwiicauacan: | |
fwantaToseeyou | [Rush |.
PREBURNED YOUR CALL | |SPECIALATTENTION | |
. —t CALL

MESSAGE

p Cale

Terry’

ror x ar oY
vHOd }

0 O00 OY

| WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH

[| | RETURNED YOUR CALL SPECIAL ATTENTION

| MESSAGE ———________________________ +

ee

‘ \e
. :

Be eh

H

| signe —

| siened_

“NEON ag ar our vr

ee eee ree ee ee ee

iS

r

my

| FoR. A R. ERSTEIN
“DATE lal C4 te 1 SO eM.

PHONE! °-
MOBILE 3

werosevar | fwaoursawy [of
| [acrumnepyouncul| —[srecuavevnow [|]
wegyoc— BRITINY 1S |
AVIMUND LE *@N TUESDAY
NO! ONE FeRAtOMORREW

4

RAPP we we

CUB UY

econ [YJ
[wmuccatacan |_|}
:
|

Sb ES,

_ . Parca ic
ot

LC ERKING

ww PY

sNICAUET & DAY

THE AROUEL :

SA0284]

GIUFFRE00 1465

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014233
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028257.txt,"/ BARAK / 123

operational capacity to mount such an attack, in part because we lacked the
necessary bunker-busting bombs and the tanker aircraft to get us to Iran and back. I
did seek help from the Americans. I met Defense Secretary Bob Gates, CIA
director Mike Hayden, National Security Adviser Steve Hadley and even President
Bush himself. While not explicitly mentioning that we were planning military
action against Iran, I sounded them out on the prospects of getting more heavy
munitions, and possibly leasing several US tanker aircraft.

Yet in our final meeting with President Bush, during a visit to Israel in June
2008, he made it clear to Olmert and me that he knew what we were up to. Olmert
hosted a private dinner for the President. Afterwards, Bush asked to talk privately.
Olmert poured us each a glass of whiskey and lit a cigar, and we sank into brown
leather armchairs. Smiling, the president looked straight at me, and said to Olmert:
“This guy scares the living shit out of me when he tells me what you want.”

He told Olmert how I’d asked for heavy munitions, tankers and a variety of
other military equipment. “Remember. I’m a former F-16 pilot,” he said. “I know
how to connect the dots.” Then, turning more serious, he added: “I want to tell
both of you now, as President, the formal position of the US government. We are
totally against any action by you to mount an attack on the nuclear plants.” The
effect was all the more dramatic because of his Administration’s support for our
attack on the reactor in Syria the year before. “I repeat,” Bush said, “in order to
avoid any misunderstanding. We expect you not to do it. And we’re not going to
do it, either, as long as I am President. I wanted it to be clear.”

Olmert said nothing, so I replied. “Mr President, we’re in no position to tell you
what the position of the United States should be. But I can tell you what I believe
history will have to say. I’m reminded by what we call, in field artillery,
‘bracketing and halving.’” I said that in the wake of the Al-Qaeda attack on the
Twin Towers, he had fired one shell long, in Afghanistan, and another one short, in
Iraq. “But when the time came to hit the real target — Iran — it ended up you’d
already spent two terms, and all your political capital.” He seemed neither insulted
nor unsettled by my remark. He simply nodded. Perhaps, in part, because he was
pretty sure that we lacked the ability to attack the Iranian facilities anyway.

We still lacked that capacity when I became Defense Minister in Bibi’s
government in May 2009. But the main reason I’d stayed in the job, and my main

409
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028257
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021236.txt,"When Gekko delivers his speech, ""Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right. Greed works,”
cinematic history was made.

“Wall Street” was set in 1985, a time before ten financial news networks broadcasting 24/7 existed. The entire
financial services industry was largely unknown and Oliver Stone nailed it.

Four years ago, Wall Street’s producer Ed Pressman decided it was time for a sequel and met with Fox Film
Entertainment co-chairmen Tom Rothman and Jim Gianopulos. Michael Douglas was immediately on-board
pending script approval. Steven Schiff wrote the first script before the global economic crash of 2008 rendered
it obsolete.

Alan Loeb was brought in for a rewrite. Pressman asked me to meet Loeb at the Carlyle Hotel to explain the
social rhythms of New York’s financial high society. Whereas Gekko’s character was modeled after ‘70s junk
bond kings (Michael Milken) and ‘80s mergers and acquisitions killers (Henry Kravis), Loeb bases the new
villain on hedge fund billionaires like John Paulson and Mike Novogratz, geniuses who have created
stratospheric wealth beyond Gordon Gekko’s wildest dreams. When Oliver Stone agreed to direct, he rewrote a
portion of the script to focus on bankers as well as hedge funders, taking no screen credit.

This past September, Oliver yelled, ""action"" as Gordon Gekko, with long grey hair, comes back to life as he
emerges from a lengthy prison stint shot outside of Sing Sing in Ossining, New York. Gekko is desperate to
redefine himself in a different era. The New York Post runs a full-page photo of Gekko and New Yorkers
immediately become obsessed with the filming of Wall Street 2.

A week into shooting, a glorious fall day. Ed Pressman invites me on the set at the Central Park Zoo. Oliver
designs an elaborate tracking shot around the seal pool where Gekko, fresh from jail, walks and talks to Jake
Moore, a young idealistic investment banker played by Shia LaBoeuf. They discuss Gekko’s daughter Winnie,
Moore’s fiancée, played by Carrie Mulligan, who is also having an off-screen romance with LaBoeuf. Oliver
played Cupid. Moore invites Gekko to the Alzheimer's Ball at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Gekko, who
used to be a sponsor or honoree of such events, cannot even afford a ticket.

The shot starts with a barking seal jumping for fish, then pans down to the actors. Extras weave in and out. In
one take Michael makes a wrong turn and ends up at the monkey house. Everyone laughs. The atmosphere on
the set is courteous but quick and tense. There is pressure when you are making a sequel to a hit.

I watch the action on monitors while sitting on the producers' canvas chairs with Pressman, Eric Kopeloff
(""Monsters Ball"") and Celia Costas, who was a location manager on the first ""Wall Street.” They have asked
me to be an extra in the Alzheimer's Ball scene and bring some friends to play rich Upper East Side socialites.
Oliver wants over the top glam, go-to-the-vault jewels and couture gowns. ""Give me the night before the
Titanic goes down,"" were his exact words. Not a problem.

I pay a quick visit to Michael in his trailer on Fifth Avenue where he is resting. We go way back. I was his
personal publicist when he won the Golden Globe and Oscar for Best Actor for ""Wall Street"" and we have
remained great friends. Gekko is just as challenging for him the second time because of endless pages of
technical financial dialogue. We discuss Catherine Zeta-Jones' Broadway debut in a ""Little Night Music.”
Michael has a stack of partially finished handwritten thank you notes next to him for gifts received for
their shared birthday party on September 25th at the St. Regis. Her 40th and his 65th.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021236
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027164.txt,"GUID: FA315842-44CE-4FB6-ABD1-OFA6EDC2A391

Tr,

Message: Good article for trump to see

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027164
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015564.txt,"Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 9 of 23

JS: Yes, I was talking about a street. Royal Palm Drive is on the island of Palm Beach, and
it’s a street that is lined with large royal palm trees, and I’m wondering if this was an
apartment on the island or was this an apartment out west of town...

V: No, it was actually in Royal Palm Beach, not on the island.

JS: — Alright.

V: I would be driven, it was closer to my family than it was closer to him. I wanted to be
close enough to everybody else so that when I was in town, I could just go see them
quickly.

JS: Ok. So we’re not talking about Royal Palm Boulevard. We’re talking about the town of
Royal Palm west of town. Jeffrey got you an apartment out there.

V: That’s correct.

JS: | When he was in Palm Beach, you were generally not staying at the mansion, you were
staying at the apartment that he got for you out west of town.

V: That’s correct.
JS: Ok.

V: I mean then there was times, I don’t wanna say that every time I stayed at my apartment.
There was times we’d fly back from some city maybe too late at night to really want to
go back home, so you know, it’s like 12:00 at night or 1:00 in the morning. I was just
staying in the yellow room, or something like that; one of the guest rooms in Palm Beach.
But majority of the time, I would definitely want to get back to my own apartment.

JS: Alright. What were the general hours of your full time employment when ...?

V: There was not set hours. It wasn’t like logging, and you know, hitting the shift button,
nothing like that. The way I would get paid would be, ok, if J was in Palm Beach, I
would get $200 an hour to massage Jeffrey or some of his friends and then go home. So
it would be like that. If I was traveling with him, it would be per massage, so I would be
getting paid per day. So I wouldn’t be getting paid on an hourly rate. He wouldn’t say
ok, today you’re going to work for me from 7:00 in the morning until 8:00 at night. It
never like that. I was on call all the time.

JS: | When you were here in Palm Beach, were you actually getting paid only for the time
spent massaging Jeffrey or were you getting paid from your arrival at his house until you
left the house?

V: From the time the massage started.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015564
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018246.txt,"see the the whole ox. Nowadays, | meet the ox with my mind and spirit rather than
see it.”4 The butcher was not looking at his work; he was feeling the energy of the
task. “A good cook goes through a knife in a year, because he cuts,” the butcher
concluded. “An average cook goes through a knife in a month, because he hacks. I
have used this knife for nineteen years. It has butchered thousands of oxen, But the
blade is still like it's newly sharpened.” He was cutting not with his knife, but with an
instinct - and the result was the highest form of mastery: accomplishment with
nearly no effort. This our our aim: To see the world with our mind, not our eyes. So
much of what will affect us in the future is invisibly stashed on a connected
landscape we're only now learning to feel. It will emerge from the complex, adaptive
sea of links expanding around us. We must tune our own instincts for this power,
which will make our moves almost effortless. The ever-sharp mental knife laid upon
the thick challenges of a new age.

There will be moments ahead for all of us - the most dangerous or terrifying or
wonderful ones - in which things will happen that none of our old ideas or senses
can help us understand. The truly new. We've had previews of such moments often
enough in recent years: innovative devices, surprise attacks, unexpected and
permanent economic quakes. A cracking of the old physics of wealth and power is
underway around us, largely invisible to most of us, except perhaps in its strange
and unnatural effects: everywhere terror, instant billionaries, the failure of ideas
and institutions, millions of migrants loosed and drifting across old borders, but
tethered to deeper fields of connection, data, and ideology. The Seventh Sense is the
ability to see why this is happening. And to use what you see. This is not merely
about brain power or sharpened intellect; it’s about a gut reaction. Just as the
demand for liberty or industry was once invisible and insensible to an age
accustomed hundreds of years ago to feudal, agricultural habits, so we're likely blind
to urgent pressures of our own. Surely you've felt this creeping anxiety yourself, the
exciting nausea of movement coming from you know not where? The ability to sense
and feel the deeper chord changes of history has, always, been the decisive mark of
leadership and success in revolutionary periods.

Consider, for instance, Charles, the Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel who faced
down Napoleon on the fields of Jena in what is now central Germany in October
1806. Brusnwick-Wolfenbuttel was then 71 years old. He was considered one of the
most courageous soldiers of his age, with a record of astonishing victories. He
looked over the sun-dappled fields along the Saar river on that fall day and saw
nearly certain victory in the coming battle. He had Napoleon outmatched two
soldiers to one. His men were masters of the subtle techniques of Frederick the
Great, tactics that had delivered victory in far more perilous moments. But
Napoleon, less than half the Duke’s age at 37, stared across the same undulating
land, the same poised armies and saw in the landscape something completely

4 When I started butchering: I’ve finessed the always-unstranslatable Zhuangzi.
See for reference Burton Watson, Burton, The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. (New
York: Columbia University Press, 1968)

14

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018246
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017175.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

conviction on the ground that “Cohen’s absurd and immature antic” was “mainly conduct and
little speech.” Under this approach, “all” speech remains constitutionally protected, but if you
don’t like the content of a particular speech—“Fuck the draft” worn on a jacket—simply call it
“conduct” and by slight of hand (or abuse of language), the constitutional protection vanishes. In
other words, First Amendment absolutists—those who claim to read literally and apply absolutely
the words “no law abridging the freedom of speech”—simple declare a genre of expression that
they do not wish to protect to be “not speech.” It reminds me of the story of the Theodore
White’s famous visit to Communist China in the days when only a select few were invited. He
was hosted by Chou en Lie at a banquet at which the main dish was roasted pork. White, a
moderately observant Jew, told the Communist leader that he could not eat pig. Without missing
a beat the leader told his guest that in China only he has the power to declare what a food item
actually is. “I hereby declare this to be duck,” he said. So White ate the “duck.”

According to the absolutist view, obscenity—including dirty words used in the context of a
political protest—is not speech. (Perhaps it’s “duck.”) The same is true for other categories of
expression that do not—in the view of at least some absolutists—warrant the protection of the
First Amendment. I know of no absolutist who would argue that all expression—including words
of extortion, falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater, or disclosure of all secrets—are protected
by the First Amendment.

Non-absolutists recognize that these forms of verbal expression are indeed “speech,” but they
argue that the words of the First Amendment should not be read literally. Some argue that they
must be understood in the context of the times when they were written, and they point to
restrictions on speech that were widely recognized in 1793. Under this approach, much of what
we take for granted today as protected speech—such as blasphemy, truthful criticism of judges
and serious art and literature of a sexual nature—would not fall within the First Amendment.

Other non-absolutists reject this “originalist” approach, preferring instead to argue for a “living,”
“evolving” and “adapting” view of the First Amendment (and the Constitution in general), which
explicitly acknowledges that courts must have the power to redefine old words to meet the new
needs of changing times.

Whichever approach is taken, it is clear that not all verbal and other form of expression are
protected by the First Amendment. There is widespread disagreement over what are appropriate
exceptions, as reflected by the divided votes of the Justices in many cases and the lack of
consensus among scholars. All seem to agree with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes that even “the
most strident protections of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a
theater....” (More on this soon.)

Several general categories of speech that may result in harms purport to flow from the “shouting
fire” paradigm. They include the following:

1. Offensiveness: Expressions that offend others, such as sexist, scatological, racist, anti-

Semitic, anti-Muslim, anti-Christian, homophobic and other demeaning or repulsive
speech.

88

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017175
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023068.txt,"May we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.

Yours sincerely,
Sharon Churcher

The Mail on Sunday (New York office)

rh a

This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which
may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named
addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else.
If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system.
Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry St, Kensington, London, W8 S5TT.
Registered No 84121 England.

De ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee a

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023068
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021222.txt,"Copyright © 2019 The Sidney Hillman Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in to our list.

Our mailing address is:
The Sidney Hillman Foundation
330 W. 42nd St., Suite 900
New York, NY 10036

Add us to your address book

unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021222
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028243.txt,"/ BARAK / 109

Chapter Twenty-Four

I had only a general idea of what I would do next. “Something in business”
describes it best. But I sought the advice of a friend who, rather than leaving
politics, had just entered it. Colin Powell was now the second President Bush’s
Secretary of State. “Why don’t you go on the lecture circuit?” he said. The short
answer was that it hadn’t occurred to me that I’d be any good at it. But it proved
energizing and interesting both for me and, it seemed, the audiences I spoke to. It
was also lucrative. I would deliver four lectures over the span of a week and end up
making twice what, until that point in my life, I had earned during a full year. I was
also invited onto a number of company boards. I turned down some, in order to
avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest. But I did get involved in an area
where I believed my range of experiences might be relevant: investment decisions,
and venture capital.

The result was a dramatic change in lifestyle. Nava and I got to spend more
time with our daughters. We vacationed overseas for the first time. We also
decided to build a new home, and the place that we chose gave me my first
experience of how far I was from being a “private citizen” in the eyes of the Israeli
public. When it became known we were planning to move to Kfar Shmaryahu near
Tel Aviv, one of the wealthiest places in Israel, all hell broke loose. How could
you, I was asked. I couldn’t resist joking that I just wanted to be close to our
voters. Likud supporters were about as rare in Kfar Shmaryahu as panhandlers.
Along with Mishmar Hasharon, it was the only place where I'd polled over 80
percent even in my loss to Sharon.

Israel had changed dramatically from the kibbutz-centered pioneer society of
my youth. Greater Tel Aviv, in particular, was thriving economically, and the
rising crop of millionaires, whether from traditional business or in the bourgeoning
technology sector, included its fair share of former kibbutznikim. Still, socially and
culturally, a puritanical streak remained, a sense that there was something not quite
right about people raised on a socialist ideal becoming personally well off. I
accepted this. I recognized that I was not just a former kibbutznik. I had been head
of the Labor Party. And Prime Minister. Still, I did feel much of the personal
criticism was unfair. I had devoted more than four decades of my life to serving
my country. I’d behaved with scrupulous honesty while in office, and was avoiding

395

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028243
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027170.txt,"Is Invitation: No

GUID: D2B41B09-1DE5-4D56-B6F6-A814211B25D7

Message: Health security

Time: 02/21/17 01:48:28 PM (509406508)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

ee

GUID: 8C1DEE75-B50B-4504-A136-6AOBF96BCCF9

Message: Some Overlap w fndn but I can try

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/21/17 02:08:06 PM (509407686)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 028B02D5-18DB-4D4E (EC-94BF4F546F0

Pa

Ez

Message: Yes

Sender: Ei i 77!

Time: 02/21/17 08:42:21 PM (509431341)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 4FDD40F5-FEB9-49D4-8225-4CD31C787C77

Message: Bill says health security works ok but should be tech or digital so everyone

knows I'm not just doing policy - he says ""title needs teeth""

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/22/17 01:27:10 AM (509448430)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 14F54925-69B9-4C1C-82DC-3C5BD97BB400

Message: Crypto health data

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/22/17 01:27:57 AM (509448477)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AS37E197-146E-439R-AGE6-2B1D627EF2C7

ft

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027170
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519.txt,"From: Lawrence Kraus sj

Sent: 3/22/2017 11:46:50 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Attachments: DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A50EC.png

Importance: — High

All shoe. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him
glory and not contribute to science.

Lawrence M. Krauss

Director, The Origins Project at ASU

Foundation Professor

School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department

Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office: 480.965.6378, Assistant

Origins Offic
a

origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/Ikrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

. = =
RSU Origins
PREOGIECT

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-
landing-on-mars/?utm_term=.64eb9bf54e09

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015570.txt,"Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 15 of 23

what was happening in the house. It would start off with massaging or we would start off
with foreplay, sometimes it would lead to, you know, orgies.

JS: Were there occasions when you were in Jeffrey’s company, whether on the ground or in
the air, where there were other girls present whom you knew to be under age 18?

V: Yes. There was a constant influx of girls coming in and going out. And we were all very
young. On occasion, there was some older girls, and I don’t mean older as in like in their
30s or anything, I mean like 28, 29, something like that, just very rarely. The majority of
the girls that Jeffrey actually met or had on his plane or in his house were under age.

JS: Do you know how it is that Jeffrey established with any of these underage girls?

V: Yes, Ido. He would send me personally or with other girls to clubs or shops, to _pick up
anywhere, J mean we were constantly on the look for other girls that might satisfy
Jeffrey.

JS: | What instructions were you given about what to look for?

V: Young, pretty, you know, a fun personality. They couldn’t be black. If they were any
other descent other than white, they had to be exotically beautiful. That was just about it.

JS: | Who gave you those criteria?

V: They both gave us the instructions, and it wasn’t just me, Jeffrey asked most girls to bring
a friend and make extra money. They would use us young girls So that way it probably
looked a lot more safer to a girl that we were procuring to younger girls that were already
doing it. That was the way that Jeffrey had it.

JS: Were you given any instruction at all on how to approach these girls?

V: Yes. Jeffrey and Ghislaine both taught me to, depending on the circumstances,
depending on the girl, you could offer them a job as a massage therapist or you could tell
them you have a really rich friend with, you know, great contacts in the acting world or
modeling world and he loves pretty girls, you should come back and meet him, make
some money, you know, we had a whole bunch of ways to be able to procure girls.

JS: Can you give me any idea as to the total number of underage girls that you know engaged
in sexual conduct with Jeffrey during the period of time you had your relationship with
him?

V: I would have no way of estimating that whatsoever. I mean, there could be a hundred,

there could be more, honestly I’m not too sure how many girls, really. I wish I did know.
I mean like I said there were so many over the course of 4 years with Jeffrey.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015570
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018252.txt,"BitCoin - these are, of course, expressions of a kind of network power. But “Network
Power” is something larger. It represents a potentially comprehensive grasp, new in
human history and enmeshing billions of connected lives and tens of billions of
linked sensors and machines. It is becoming, with every passing moment, more
comprehensive: more sensors, more links, more points and more speed. Cascades,
epidemics and interactions are ubiquitous on all these networks, producing
unexpected innovation in their collisions: the weaving of genetics and databases, for
instance, or of terrorism and mobile messaging"". Scientists who study networks call
this sort of change “Explosive Percolation,” by which they mean an instant shift in
the very nature of a system as it passes a threshold level of connectivity.15 This
melding of nodes into a single fabric is not unlike the linking of water molecules one
to another as the temperature drops. One moment you have something you can
drink; the next you have ice. So: One moment you have a world of simply connected
users, the next a billion-person platform like Facebook or YouTube solidifies. One
day you have tumbling, angry fundamentalists; the nexta linked terror movement.
And because the impact of terrorism - which might be best defined as violence with
an aim of causing psychological impact - depends on connection, exploding the
landscape of links instantly expands its effects.1° The network enables a new kind of
terror. It changes its nature. Expands its impact. Such elemental phase transitions,
where more means different, appear everywhere in linked natural systems- the
formation of crystals, for example, of the collapse of an ecosystem when the last of a
keystone species is hunted down. They appear on networks too. So you might say: A
phase transtion lingers ahead of us in our security, our finances, our politics. The
age we're entering now will be as different from the age we're leaving behind as the
Enlightenment was from the dark feudal era that preceded it.

The Enlightenment’s revolution of free ideas and men and trade and capital
demanded a new sensibility. Our age is similar. It insists already on a fresh feeling
for the power that emerges as a result of connection. There’s an irony here: At the
very moment when we might expect ourselves to be most free - liberated by
wireless connections, by easy jet travel, by never-off communications - we find
ourselves, inescapably, enmeshed and dependent. Mastery of connection turns out
to be the modern version of Napoleon’s Coup D’Oeil. Connection increasingly defines
the most elemental pieces of our lives. The old individualistic, me-first instincts
don’t answer as well as they might once have when “me-first” now demands
connection of some sort in order to get what you might want: Am education, better
medical care, a pizza. What is true for the machines all around us now is true for us
too: We are what we are connected to.

4 Cascades, epidemics and interactions: Dirk Helbing, “Globally Networked Risks
and How to Respond,” Nature, 2013, 51-59.

15 Scientists who study networks: D. Achlioptas, R. M. D'souza, and J. Spencer.
""Explosive Percolation in Random Networks."" Science, 2009, 1453-455.

16 And because the nature of terrorism: See Anthony Richards, Conceptualizing
Terrorism, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)

20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018252
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017161.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

Professor Dershowitz sees his job not as teaching “the specifics of law in any jurisdiction;
anyone can find that on his own,” but to teach his students how “to ask the right questions
and bring to bear the right information for the right purpose.” In short, her purports to
teach his students how to think critically and teach themselves.

“T can only present the problems,” he explains. “In many instances there are no answers,
and I don’t particularly care what answers the students find. As long as they see the
process in perspective and are equipped to ask the right questions, that’s all that counts.”

We deal with common day-to-day documents of the law—indictments, probation reports,
transcripts—not merely sterile abstracts of appellate cases...Every major problem faced by
the practicing lawyer will come up eventually. But the student will have to find them; they
won’t pop out at him...We don’t play the logical, cute little game that often typifies
criminal law courses. There are rarely pat answers and clear distinctions in this course;
the student will have to make his own chapter titles.”

Some traditionalists were appalled at my interdisciplinary approach. One distinguished alumnus
spoke for many when he wrote:

“Professor Dershowitz seems to epitomize some of the lack of reality at the law
school....Until such time as our whole penalogical system is changed, the law student is
going to have to know his ‘law’ as his preliminary basis for the experience to cope with
existing institutions and do a lawyer’s job. One cannot deny the credentials of Professor
Dershowitz’s genius, but I question whether the application of his genius as apparently
applied, is of any help making good lawyers out of Harvard law students.”

My approach was defended by Justice Arthur Goldberg, for whom I had just finished clerking,
who assured my critics that: “Mr. Dershowitz’s students will be the beneficiaries of his engaging
personality and extraordinary insight into the subjects he will teach, just as I was.”

The Harvard Law Record also editorialized that:

It is good to know that many of these subjects are being injected into the Harvard Law
curriculum by young Professor Alan M. Dershowitz; no doubt, even with our liberal arts
backgrounds, we could stand and benefit from more such learning.

Shortly thereafter, a lead article in the New York Times Magazine, comparing Harvard and Yale
law schools, described me as “a fresh wind blowing through Harvard” and as an extremely
popular teacher.*’ That article afforded me legitimacy, even among some of the faculty and
alumni who remained skeptical about my non-traditional approach to teaching law. At the end of
my first year, I was given the highest teaching rating among the faculty. A subsequent article said
that, “his students have praised him as ‘the master of the hypothetical—answer one correctly, and
he’s got one in his arsenal that’s guaranteed to tie your tongue in knots.’” Soon, younger
teachers were asking to sit in on my classes. I always said yes.

?1 New York Times Magazine, September 11, 1966, Victor S. Nevasky, The Yales vs. The Harvards
74

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017161
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016079.txt,"Bibliography 389

Franzén, Torkel. Gédel’s Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse. AK
Peters/CRC Press, 2005.

Godel, Kurt. On Formally Undecidable Propositions of “Principia Mathematica” and
Related Systems. New edition. Dover Publications Inc., 2003.

Goldrei, D.C. Classic Set Theory: A Guided Introduction. Chapman and Hall/CRC,
1996.

Hofstadter, Douglas R. Gédel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. 20th
Anniversary ed. Penguin, 2000.

Nagel, Ernest, and James R. Newman. Gédel’s Proof. Rev. Ed. New York University
Press, 2001.

Newton, Sir Isaac. Principia. Prometheus Books, 1995.

Penrose, Sir Roger. Shadows Of The Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of
Consciousness. New edition. Vintage, 2005.

Potter, Michael. Set Theory and Its Philosophy: A Critical Introduction. Clarendon
Press, 2004.

Russell, Bertrand. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Reprint. Spokesman
Books, 2007.

Sautoy, Marcus Du. The Music of the Primes: Why an Unsolved Problem in
Mathematics Matters. New Ed. Harper Perennial, 2004.

———. The Number Mysteries: A Mathematical Odyssey Through Everyday Life.
Fourth Estate, 2010.

Whitehead, Alfred North, and Bertrand Russell. Principia Mathematica - Volume
One: 1. Rough Draft Printing, 2009.

Chapter 10

Copeland, B. Jack. The Essential Turing. Clarendon Press, 2004.

David, Hans T. The New Bach Reader: Life of Johann Sebastian Bach in Letters and
Documents. New edition. W. W. Norton & Co., 1999.

Dennett, Daniel C., and Douglas R. Hofstadter. The Mind’s I: Fantasies and
Reflections on Self and Soul. Basic Books, 2000.

Dewdney. New Turing Omnibus. Reprint. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

edited by B. Jack Copeland. The Essential Turing : Seminal Writings in Computing,
Logic, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Artificial Life plus the Secrets of
Enigma. Reprinted. Clarendon Press, 2005.

Gallwey, W Timothy, and Barry Green. Inner Game of Music. 7th ed. Pan, 2003.

Hofstadter, Douglas R. I Am a Strange Loop. Reprint. Basic Books, 2008.

Levitin, Daniel J. This Is Your Brain on Music: Understanding a Human Obsession.
Atlantic Books, 2008.

Penrose, Roger. The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. New Ed. Cambridge
University Press, 2000.

Penrose, Sir Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and
the Laws of Physics. New Ed. Oxford Paperbacks, 1999.

Petzold, Charles. The Annotated Turing: A Guided Tour Through Alan Turing’s
Historic Paper on Computability and the Turing Machine. John Wiley &
Sons, 2008.

Sacks, Oliver. Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain. Reprint. Picador, 2008.

Singh, Simon. The Code Book: The Secret History of Codes and Code-Breaking.
(Reissue). Fourth Estate, 2002.

Turing, Alan. “Checking a Large Routine?’ In The Early British Computer
Conferences, 70-72. MIT Press, 1989. http://dl.acm.org/citation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016079
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012656.txt,"KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

AND AFFILIATED PARTNERSHIPS

777 South Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, Califomla 90017

Kenneth W. Starr PF Facsimile:

To Call Writer Directly: (213) 680-8500
www.kiddand.com

November 28, 2007
VIA FACSIMILE

Honorable Alice S. Fisher
Assistant Attorney General
Department of Justice
Criminal Division

950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Room 2107

Washington, DC 20530

Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Dear Ms. Fisher:

« T represent Jeffrey Epstein, who, as you may be aware, was the target of a dual
investigation by both state and federal authorities in Florida for acts relating to his interactions
with numerous young women. As you may also be aware, Mr. Epstein has entered into a
Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the United States Attorney’s Office for
the Southern District of Florida (the “USAO”) to resolve its criminal investigation of him. I am
writing to. request a meeting with you to discuss certain aspects of this case that I find especially
troublesome.

As part of the agreement Mr. Epstein was required to sign to avoid a federal indictment,

Mr. Epstein was required to waive jurisdiction and liability under 18 U.S.C. §2255 for the
_ Settlement of monetary claims that might-be made by a group of unidentified alleged victims

who will be identified by the USAO at some point in the future. Neither I, nor any of the other
defense lawyers involved in this matter, have ever héard of sucha procedure. And as part of this
Agreement, Mr. Epstein is precluded from contesting liability as to civil lawsuits secking
monetary compensation for damages brought by any of the identified individuals who elect to :
settle their civil claims for the statutory minimum of either $50,000 (the amount set by Congress
as of the date of the occurrences) or $150,000 (the amount currently set by statute) or some other
agreed upon damage amount. ‘We believe that the utilization of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 asa pre-
condition of criminal plea agreements or nhon-prosecution agreements is highly unusual and
requires careful consideration and additional guidance by your Office. We also believe that the

.

: \ Chicago Hang Kong London Munich New York . San Francisco Washington, D.C.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012656
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020384.txt,"BA 8:

CHAPTER TWO
The Crime Scene Investigation

10.

11.

12.

13

14

1S.

. “Something is not right,” Alexander...

“Any private contractor. ..”—Snowden Interviewed by Brian Williams, NBC,
May 28, 2014 (Hereinafter Snowden NBC Interview.)

“About 15 miles....”.—U.S. Navy Information Operations Command, “History
of NIOC Hawaii”, http://www.public.navy.mil/fec-
c10f/niochi/Pages/AboutUs.aspx

“Keith Alexander, the four-star general who headed...”—Author’s Interview
with Keith Alexander

“The NSA meanwhile notified the FBI...”— Author’s interview with
anonymous source A, a former government intelligence executive familiar with
the initial investigation.

“Within the next few days...” ...”— Author’s interview with anonymous
source A, a former government intelligence executive familiar with the initial
investigation.

”’Copied “over 900,000” military files...” —the document was obtained via a
Freedom of Information request by VICE. See Jason Leopold, “Inside
Washington's Quest to Bring Down Edward Snowden,” Vice, June 4, 2015
“NSA did not immediately share with the CIA....” Morell, op.cit. pp. 283-288
“By late July, NSA investigators...”-- Author’s interview with anonymous
source B, a former government intelligence executive familiar with the initial
investigation.

“They could walk out the door,” Snowden interview, German NDR TV,
January 26, 2014. http://www.tagesschau.de/snowden-interview-
englisch100.pdf

“According to Ledgett, the perpetrator...” Tabassum Zakaria and Warren
Strobel, “After 'cataclysmic' Snowden affair, NSA faces winds of change,”
Reuters December 13, 2013

“the analysis of the logs,” Author's interview with Source A

Services’ “black budget...”-- Morell .op.cit. p. 285

”_-“Tnterview transcript: General Keith
Alexander,” Australian Financial Review.
http://www.afr.com/technology/web/security/interview-transcriptformer-head-of-the-
nsa-and-commander-of-the-us-cyber-command-general-keith-alexander-20140507-
itzhw#ixzz3m6TkuRal

. “This discovery came when...”—Guardian staff, “Glenn Greenwald's partner

detained at Heathrow airport for nine hours, Guardian, August 18, 2013
“What we know, what we don’t know...”-- Bryan Burroughs, Sarah Ellison

and Suzanna Andrews. “The Snowden Saga, Vanity Fair, May 2014.
(Hereinafter “The Snowden Saga.)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020384
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013548.txt,"a guru’s ecstatic death, Samadhi, both Gurumayi and young Nityananda became
co-gurus. Following three years of the usual covert power struggles of succession in
organizations, Gurumayi took over the guru lineage of Siddha Yoga. Her lively
brother’s worldly preoccupations with jazz drumming and confessions of promiscuity
led to his giving up of the orange robe of the denunciate, sanyasi, for the blue robe
of worldliness, exchanging one kind of energy for another.

Brad Gooch who visited Gurumayi’s Ashram in Ganeshpuri, India, wrote in
his recent book, Godta/k, that she looks like a “synthesis of Indira Gandhi and
Bianca Jagger.” In what reads like a Hunter Thompson episode in an unwritten book
called Fear and Loathing Along the Guru Trail, Godtalk’s explication of Siddha Yoga
was dominated by yellow journalistic rumors such as the one about Baba’s use of a
gynecologist’s table with stirrups for non-ejaculatory Tantric practice with some
female followers. This unconfirmed claim remains, as Gooch says, in the realm of
“...he said, she said.” Gooch’s exploration almost ignores the deeper meanings of
Kashmir Shavism, Buddhism and Kundalini Yoga that compose the philosophical
foundations of Siddha Yoga. The importance of knowing, loving and becoming one
with the God within trivializes all but ungenerous or hurtful interpersonal behavior.
Even the tougher version of the Ten Commandments in Leviticus 19 would not
necessarily disagree.

When a Los Angeles Times reporter tried to chide Baba about being driven
about in his “worldly” Mercedes sedan, he explained that a very wealthy Indian
merchant had given it to him and “...| have to put my behind somewhere.” Similarly,
why would Gooch’s account of Baba’s Tantric practice, even if true, ruin the imago
of him in my mind unless | had already surrendered to the pantheon of good and
evil absolutes of Judeo-Christian taboo? My knowledge of these non-materialistic
meanings of apparent materialism began with one of the favorite finds of Baba’s
youthful days of guru hunting: Zipruanna, who, wearing only a loincloth spent all
day, every day, on a stool in the middle of a garbage dump. Remarkable changes
occurred in people who spent time there in his presence. Baba said the identity of
guru was established by the results experienced by those that spent time in his

presence. It could not be defined by the physical features or ritual conduct of the

48

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013548
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019505.txt,"Tinker | 17

used weight lifting and intensive training to precision shape his body.
He bragged to his online followers that he had reduced his “body fat
percentage to between 9.5% and 10.5%” (which was less than half
of the average for his age). He wrote that he wore “cool” purple sun-
glasses, practiced martial arts, and was a fan of Japanese cuisine. He
described himself at one point, as if advertising his virtues, as having
a “head of vibrant, shimmering blond hair (with volume).”

He appeared somewhat restless with his solitary life in his almost
daily postings. He expressed a longing to go to Japan. “I’ve always
dreamed of being able to ‘make it’ in Japan. I’ve taken Japanese for
a year and a half,” he wrote in 2002. Despite his claim of learning
Japanese, there is no record of his taking any courses in Japanese.
But it was perhaps part of his yearning. In pursuit of an employ-
ment opportunity in Japan, he posted, “I’d love a cushy gov job over
there.” Eventually, he gave up on the idea of relocating himself to
Japan because, as he explained in a post, he would have to put his cats
in quarantine for six months.

Snowden’s father meanwhile moved to Pennsylvania with his

© new wife-to-be. This left Snowden with only one male family mem- ©
ber in the area, his maternal grandfather, Admiral Barrett, who was
now in the top echelon of U.S. intelligence working at the Pentagon.
Barrett was there when a plane piloted by terrorists crashed into it
on 9/11. He emerged unscathed.

Snowden sought to join the Special Forces through the 18X pro-
gram, a U.S. Army Reserve program created in 2003 that allowed
individuals who had not served in the military or completed their
education to train to be a Special Forces recruit. He listed his religion
on the application as Buddhist because, as he explained in a sardonic
post on Ars Technica, “agnostic is strangely absent” from the form.

He enlisted in the army reserves on May 7, 2004, according to
U.S. Army records. He reported for a ten-week basic training at Fort
Benning, Georgia, which was standard for all enlistees in the infan-
try. In August, he began a three-week course in parachute jumping
but did not complete that training. As Snowden put it in his Inter-
net postings, he “washed out.” He was discharged on September 29,
2004, ending his nineteen-week military career. Snowden would
later claim on the Internet that he returned to civilian life because

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 17 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019505
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014227.txt,"f PHONE/
MOBILE

RETURNED YOUR CALL| || SPECIAL ATTENTION
8 op ow _

Pe 4
Op,
Ves

MESSAGE 2

td

Lge tts

| SIGN Poe

[IMPORTANT MESSAGE | |
| ron 28 LZ LSP eER

AM.
TIME__..__

""DATE PM. |

aia

iM
PHONEY

MOBILE a3
TELEPHONED | [PLease CAL CAL ||
nieve seevO0 | fw cauacane | —

| |

WANTS TO SEE YOU

Ps,

| MESSAGE

| [IMPORTANT MESSAGE

MOBILE :
PY onucacan [|
[waristoseevou | fms | TT
faeTuRNED YOUR cali] _[SPECALATTENTION ||)

} PHONE/ 7 32 co 7 a4

MESSAGE

ke

rr
OF

PHONES
| MOBILE.

frac [>
Fuses

“TVcametoseevou | |wircanacan | |]

RETURNED YOUR CALL

| MESSAGE

8402827

ne

b SIGNED 1184:

HOUSE_

SPEGIALATTENTION |__|

GIUFFRE00 1451

OVERSIGHT_014227
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031106.txt,"From: COLOM, Olivier 
Sent: 10/19/2013 11:21:35 AM 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Re: 
How come you're always right? 
She is not awful looking though. Her father is Samuel and she worked with the spokesman of Clinton at the White 
House. She lives in Paris now. 40ish. 
She teaches at University and also works at Huffington Post. Very much in the middle of US - France relations. 
Found out that Castelbajac has his showroom next door to my new apartment. Have already seen some models come 
and go - to your liking I think 
De : Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Envoye : Saturday, October 19, 2013 12:24 PM 
A: COLOM, Olivier 
Objet: Re: 
no, I assume she she clever not cute 
2013/10/19 COLOM, Olivier __________________________________ 
Do you know Leah Pisar? 
De : COLOM, Olivier 
voye : Friday, October 18, 2013 10:19 PM 
A : jeevacation@cimail.com' <jeevacation@cimail.com> 
Objet: Re: 
Have you got an idea for me?:) 
We had fun with Ariane this week. She talked everyday about you and the advice you gave her last Sunday by the way. 
And her mum likes you as well 
De : COLOM, Olivier 
voye : Friday, October 18, 2013 06:41 PM 
A : jeevacation@cimail.com' <jeevacation@cimail.com> 
Objet: Re: 
Have to do some stuff, like more ""political"", but might go to Ethiopia instead of NY early November 
De : COLOM, Olivier 
voye : Friday, October 18, 2013 04:44 PM 
A : jeevacation@cimail.com' <jeevacation@cimail.com> 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031106 
Objet: Re: 
Pleasure of seeing you, hopefully... 
De : Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Envoye : Friday, October 18, 2013 04:36 PM 
A: COLOM, Olivier 
Objet: Re: 
any things to do 
2013/10/18 COLOM, Olivier 
Could be there in first half of November. Or December 
De : Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Envoye : Friday, October 18, 2013 04:24 PM 
A: COLOM, Olivier 
Objet: Re: 
when are you next in ny? 
2013/10/18 COLOM, Olivier 
Don't remember what we said re scheduling 
De : Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com] 
Envoye : Friday, October 18, 2013 04:20 PM 
A: COLOM, Olivier 
Objet: Re: 
yes 
2013/10/18 COLOM, Olivier 
You mean schedule ? :) 
In your island now? 
De : Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Envoye : Friday, October 18, 2013 04:18 PM 
A: COLOM, Olivier 
Objet: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031107 
scheudle? 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
.41-314 
Ensemble adoptons des gestes responsables : N'imprimez ce mail que si necessaire. 
Ce message et ses annexes sont strictement confidentiels et etablis a l'attention exclusive des 
destinataires prevus par l'expediteur. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire de ce message, nous vous 
remercions de le detruire immediatement et d'en avertir l'expediteur. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non 
autorisee de ce message et de ses annexes est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible 
d'alteration et son integrite ne peut etre assuree. 
Le Groupe Edmond de Rothschild ne pourra etre tenu pour responsable des erreurs ou omissions 
contenues dans ce message. Ce message ne constitue en aucun cas un engagement du Groupe 
Edmond de Rothschild, sous reserve de tout accord par ecrit entre vous et le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild. Conformement a la Loi Informatique et Libertes, n°78-17 du 6 juillet 1978, modifiee par la 
loi n°2004-801 du 6 aollit 2004, toute personne a le droit d'interroger le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild en vue de savoir si les traitements automatises dont il dispose contiennent des 
informations nominatives la concernant, les faire rectifier ou les faire supprimer. 
Francais I English I Italian° I Deutsch I Espanol I Chinese 
©2004 - La Compagnie Financiere Edmond de Rothschild Banque - tous droits reserves 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031108 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
Ensemble adoptons des gestes responsables : N'imprimez ce mail que si necessaire. 
Ce message et ses annexes sont strictement confidentiels et etablis a l'attention exclusive des 
destinataires prevus par l'expediteur. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire de ce message, nous vous 
remercions de le detruire immediatement et d'en avertir l'expediteur. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non 
autorisee de ce message et de ses annexes est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible 
d'alteration et son integrite ne peut etre assuree. 
Le Groupe Edmond de Rothschild ne pourra etre tenu pour responsable des erreurs ou omissions 
contenues dans ce message. Ce message ne constitue en aucun cas un engagement du Groupe 
Edmond de Rothschild, sous reserve de tout accord par ecrit entre vous et le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild. Conformement a la Loi Informatique et Libertes, n°78-17 du 6 juillet 1978, modifiee par la 
loi n°2004-801 du 6 aollit 2004, toute personne a le droit d'interroger le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild en vue de savoir si les traitements automatises dont il dispose contiennent des 
informations nominatives la concernant, les faire rectifier ou les faire supprimer. 
Francais I English I Italian° I Deutsch I Espanol I Chinese 
©2004 - La Compagnie Financiere Edmond de Rothschild Banque - tous droits reserves 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031109 
Ensemble adoptons des gestes responsables : N'imprimez ce mail que si necessaire. 
Ce message et ses annexes sont strictement confidentiels et etablis a l'attention exclusive des 
destinataires prevus par l'expediteur. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire de ce message, nous vous 
remercions de le detruire immediatement et d'en avertir l'expediteur. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non 
autorisee de ce message et de ses annexes est interdite. Tout message electronigue est susceptible 
d'alteration et son integrite ne peut etre assuree. 
Le Groupe Edmond de Rothschild ne pourra etre tenu pour responsable des erreurs ou omissions 
contenues dans ce message. Ce message ne constitue en aucun cas un engagement du Groupe 
Edmond de Rothschild, sous reserve de tout accord par ecrit entre vous et le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild. Conformement a la Loi Informatigue et Libertes, n°78-17 du 6 juillet 1978, modifiee par la 
loi n°2004-801 du 6 aollit 2004, toute personne a le droit d'interroger le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild en vue de savoir si les traitements automatises dont il dispose contiennent des 
informations nominatives la concernant, les faire rectifier ou les faire supprimer. 
Francais I English I Italian° I Deutsch I Espanol I Chinese 
©2004 - La Compagnie Financiere Edmond de Rothschild Banque - tous droits reserves 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
Ensemble adoptons des gestes responsables : N'imprimez ce mail que si necessaire. 
Ce message et ses annexes sont strictement confidentiels et etablis a l'attention exclusive des 
destinataires prevus par l'expediteur. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire de ce message, nous vous 
remercions de le detruire immediatement et d'en avertir l'expediteur. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non 
autorisee de ce message et de ses annexes est interdite. Tout message electronigue est susceptible 
d'alteration et son integrite ne peut etre assuree. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031110 
Le Groupe Edmond de Rothschild ne pourra etre tenu pour responsable des erreurs ou omissions 
contenues dans ce message. Ce message ne constitue en aucun cas un engagement du Groupe 
Edmond de Rothschild, sous reserve de tout accord par ecrit entre vous et le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild. Conformement a la Loi Informatique et Libertes, n°78-17 du 6 juillet 1978, modifiee par la 
loi n°2004-801 du 6 aollit 2004, toute personne a le droit d'interroger le Groupe Edmond de 
Rothschild en vue de savoir si les traitements automatises dont il dispose contiennent des 
informations nominatives la concernant, les faire rectifier ou les faire supprimer. 
Francais I English I Italian° I Deutsch I Espanol I Chinese 
©2004 - La Compagnie Financiere Edmond de Rothschild Banque - tous droits reserves 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
gb-St? 
Ensemble adoptons des gestes responsables : N'imprimez ce mail que si necessaire. 
Ce message et ses annexes sont strictement confidentiels et etablis a l'attention exclusive des destinataires prevus par 
l'expediteur. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire de ce message, nous vous remercions de le detruire immediatement et 
d'en avertir l'expediteur. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee de ce message et de ses annexes est interdite. Tout 
message electronigue est susceptible d'alteration et son integrite ne peut etre assuree. 
Le Groupe Edmond de Rothschild ne pourra etre tenu pour responsable des erreurs ou omissions contenues dans ce 
message. Ce message ne constitue en aucun cas un engagement du Groupe Edmond de Rothschild, sous reserve de 
tout accord par ecrit entre vous et le Groupe Edmond de Rothschild. Conformement a la Loi Informatigue et Libertes, 
n°78-17 du 6 juillet 1978, modifiee par la loi n°2004-801 du 6 aout 2004, toute personne a le droit d'interroger le Groupe 
Edmond de Rothschild en vue de savoir si les traitements automatises dont il dispose contiennent des informations 
nominatives la concernant, les faire rectifier ou les faire supprimer. 
Francais I English I Italian° I Deutsch I Espanol I Chinese  
©2004 - La Compagnie Financiere Edmond de Rothschild Banque - tous droits reserves 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031111 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011859.txt,"/ BARAK / 102

Israeli sovereignty over the Western Wall of the ancient temple. Nor would he
agree to any compromise on the “right of return.”

For me, that was the final answer. As one Palestinian leader remarked to me
amid the still-escalating terror attacks a couple of years later, the Palestinians had
“needed a Ben-Gurion, but we got an Arafat.” He didn’t mean Ben-Gurion the
Zionist, but the statesman who at crucial moments like the partition vote in 1947,
could give up his maximalist hopes and dreams in order to secure a better future
for his people. Arafat felt much more comfortable, more secure, when the suicide
bombers were calling the tune. Then he could whip up the crowds with promises of
“marching on Jerusalem” or jet around the world telling everyone that Israel was
denying his right to a state.

Though I now knew an agreement was impossible, for many on the Israeli left,
my ostensible allies in the forthcoming election campaign against Arik, that was
hard to accept. Particularly for Yossi Sarid of Meretz, and to a certain extent Yossi
Beilin too, the only explanation for our failure to get a deal had to be that we
hadn’t negotiated well or creatively enough. The idea that Arafat simply didn’t
want a two-state peace was anathema to them. So was the political platform I said
that I hoped to implement if I was re-elected as Prime Minister. Maybe, at some
point in the future, a negotiated peace might be possible. We had accomplished
something of importance at Camp David. We’d made clear our red lines. We knew
where Arafat stood. But for now, I believed we had to move on, both in order to
keep the situation on the ground from getting worse and to act in Israel’s own long-
term political and security interests. I said we should unilaterally disengage from
the West Bank and Gaza.

The idea was straightforward. The Palestinians’ unwillingness to accept even
the final Clinton parameters, driven home with murderous ferocity by the
explosion of violence since Camp David, should not be allowed to paralyze Israel
politically. I proposed that we map out the area we required to retain and secure the
major settlement blocs, as well as the outer East Jerusalem suburbs; a further
security strip along the Jordan River; and several other strategically important

388
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011859
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019263.txt,"Freedom House

Chapter 4

The Ministry of Truth in Peace and War

An early and telling sign that Vladimir Putin planned
something more ambitious than a mere tightening
of state control over political life was his decision to
return Joseph Stalin to his position in the pantheon
of great Russian leaders. Stalin's rehabilitation was
formalized in 2007, with the publication of a new cur-
riculum guide for teachers of Russian history.'

The manuals content dovetailed with Putin's broader
promotion of a narrative in which Russia is a great
power that recovered from the chaos and weakness
of the Yeltsin era and overcame the hostility of deter-
mined enemies, especially the United States. Accord-
ing to the manual, Russia's dark chapters—its domi-
nation of Eastern Europe, internal repression, Stalinist
purges—were the regrettable but understandable
responses to the country’s underdevelopment and
encirclement by foreign enemies. The new history
paints a picture of an all-wise Russian state, under
both Stalin and Putin, whose requirements always
take precedence over the needs of the individual.?

Putin took unusual interest in the preparation of the
history manual. The idea that history should be written
by historians, not political leaders, was never voiced in
public discussion. Putin later called for history textbooks
“written in proper Russian, free of internal contradic-
tions and double interpretation.’? He said the manual

was needed to clear up “the muddle” in teachers’ heads.

And in unveiling the new guide, he struck a theme
that runs through Russian propaganda in the Putin
era: Russian history “did contain some problematic

pages,” he said. “But so did other states’ histories.

We have fewer of them than in other countries. And
they were less terrible than in some other countries.”
Putin's basic message was that “we can't allow anyone
to impose a sense of guilt on us.""* More broadly, Putin
was saying that a sovereign state has the right to
interpret its history in whatever way it wants, to ignore
or distort the tragic chapters, and to burnish the repu-
tations of mass murderers and thugs.

Whereas other countries simply avoid serious study
of the most shameful episodes of their histories, as
Indonesia has done with the epidemic of political

killings during the 1960s, or as China has done with
the Cultural Revolution, Russia treats the Stalin era

“Its easy predicting the future;
what's difficult is predicting the
past.”

—Soviet joke

""A lie isn't an alternative
point of view.”

—Linus Linkeviéius, Lithuanian foreign minister

“The implied objective of this line
of thought is a nightmare world in
which the Leader, or some ruling
clique, controls not only the future
but the past... This prospect fright-
ens me much more than bombs.""

—George Orwell, Looking Back on the Spanish War

as a time of progress during which the foundation for
modern Russian greatness was laid.>

To build a case that Russia's dark pages were “less

a

terrible” than those of other countries, Russia's official
history depicts Stalin as a strong leader who was ca-

pable of acts of cruelty but whose rough tactics were

necessary for the defense of the homeland, which was
besieged militarily by the Nazis and politically by the
capitalist powers.

Excusing the Soviet empire

The Russian leadership is especially tenacious in
defending Stalin's World War || diplomacy. Putin, for
example, has defended the Hitler-Stalin pact, the
1939 nonaggression agreement that opened the door
to Nazi Germany's invasion of Poland and carved up
much of Eastern Europe between the two totalitarian
states. While Putin called the pact “immoral” during
a 2009 visit to Poland, he defended the agreement
during a joint press conference with Angela Merkel in
2015, following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

q

He did so in a fashion typical of current Russian propa-
ganda methods. He accused the West of trying to “hush

www.freedomhouse.org

29

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019263
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011681.txt,"right man for the moment: Raful’s deputy, Moshe Levy. Well over six feet tall,
he was known as Moshe Vecheizi. “Moshe-and-a-Half.” He was reserved and
soft-spoken, a safe pair of hands after the trauma of the war.

But Arens also had to name a successor to Saguy as head of military
intelligence. And for that job, he nominated me.

210
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011681
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029910.txt,"From: Pritzker, To

Sent: 8/8/2016 9:28:25 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: Re:

Importance: — High

You have to be a bit of a wonk to know some of the names, but Nye, Scowcroft and Nick Burns run it (Scowcroft being
replaced by Condi). Members include Patraeus, Albright, Slaughter, Donalon (Obama NSA), Hadley (Bush NSA), Sullivan
(NSA Hillary), Bill Burns (State #2), Kurt Campbell, Hoss Carwright (#2 Jt Chiefs), Harman, Ignatius, Sanger, Nunn, Reed,
Sawers (MI6), Sherman (iran deal), Work (current #2 DoD). It seems to now be taking on an aura.

Looking for a time to come catch up in NY.

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 2:45 PM

To: Pritzker, Torr [a

Subject: Re:

who attends

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Pritzker, Tom (> wrote:

I'm working on a date. Just finished presentation on leadership to grand pooh baahs of Aspen Strategy
Group. Take a look at members it will make you laugh. Certainly made me laugh when they asked me to do
it.

On Aug 8, 2016, at 9:55 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

glenn?

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error,
please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029910
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030218.txt,"From: Richard Kahn 
Sent: 5/13/2015 11:27:12 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: FW: Library 
Attachments: IMG_1049.JPG; IMG_1058.JPG; IMG_1055.JPG; IMG_1049.JPG 
Importance: High 
From: Brandon Thompson 
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 7:15 PM 
To: Richard Kahn ______________________________ 
Subject: Re: Library 
<1= 
Dear Richard, 
For the first time in my life, I am facing the real prospect of dismissal from the project. 
This is due mainly to misunderstanding. 
Mr. Epstein came today and told me very bluntly that he is annoyed with me not doing the job. I prepared one column for him 
and the several feet of decorative molding, but this was a miss. He told me it looks like it was done yesterday. 
This is the very first time that I work like this. I did several projects for French customers in Greenwich, Conn., but always I 
produced the sample and than work 
according to the samples. The paneling I work on were early 19 c. so even the oak looked different. Even at the White House, 
when I was restoring Blue Room, which you can look at it on my Website, www.brandonthompsonrestoration.com I produced 
design, made samples and did the project. President Clinton told me this is the most beautiful Room, he was clearly 
impressed. 
This time I know exactly what Mr. Epstein wants. However it might be too late. He will come tomorrow to check. 
Today I did a lot of prep work for tomorrow. I will go tonight to work on some of the columns but the night light is deceiving 
and I may miss the last chance he gave me. 
So far I was rated the best finisher, until now I guess. 
Warm regards 
Brandon 
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Brandon Thompson wrote: 
Dear Richard, 
the samples are ready for approval. I finished one column about 95%, as I want to put some accents on it but after I discuss it 
with Mr. Epstein. I also finished upper section above the blackboard. I also finished some other columns, not completely, 
because I need the approval. My feeling is that someone was already working in the Library, as I can see a lot of waxing done. 
I finished one column so it will correspond with the rest of the decor. You can not remove the whitish color completely. 
There are some ""bald"" columns, which in my opinion do not sort of belong to the Library any more as they are completely 
brown. Everything has to have at least an shadow of what is around. The top carving, moldings columns and other elements 
in the Library, have to ""bond"" together. The upper small carvings, have to be finished individually, as a play between the 
whitish color and natural brown color of oak wood. I sort of model the shapes of the crabs, snails and other creatures and 
they come alive. I think I did good work but Mr. Epstein needs to approve it so I can go ahead and finish the project. 
Kindly, 
Brandon 
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Brandon Thompson < wrote: 
Dear Richard, 
I prepared some samples for Mr. Epstein for today. I did not waist time as there is a lot of work in the Library. However, I 
need his approval to continue. Tonight I will go back and start installation of the doors and panels. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030218 
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Brandon Thompson 
Dear Richard, 
I am not sure whether the photos depict the column right. I looked at it and does not do the justice to what you have on 
the column. I hope you can see the details like even changing the white areas into rubbed ones and emphasising crabs. 
Making the rope ""wet"" looking, contrasting the rubbed areas with white, and looking at the entire column as a whole. 
All the columns are looking different, as somebody would work previously on them, and some of them are over-rubbed, 
some of them are not rubbed at all. The upper part also, I prepared a sample, so Mr. Epstein can see the difference. 
Brandon 
> wrote: 
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Brandon Thompson > wrote: 
Dear Richard, 
It is after 9:20 pm and I tried to text Ann, but she did not answer. My suspicion is, she is already asleep. I will try to send 
you photos if I can. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030219 
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Richard Kahn 
Please send photos. Thank you 
Sent from my iPhone 
wrote: 
> On May 10, 2015, at 6:07 PM, Brandon Thompson < > wrote: 
> Dear Richard, 
> We were expecting Mr. Epstein to come today and I was preparing presentation for him. Ann, the manager here called 
me that there was change in schedule and Mr. Epstein is expected to come tomorrow early afternoon. 
> For this presentation, I finished one column for him. 
> This is not a regular work that I have done on it. Actually, I balanced the ""whites"" and ""darker"" rubbed off elements. 
Further, I balanced shiny areas and matt. 
> After doing this, I worked on differentiating darker areas, making them lighter and darker, depending on the location. I 
did the same with ""whites"". Then I emphasized certain elements even more, like rope, net, crabs. This work requires 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030220 
more than finisher to do it. I have high hopes, than this time Mr. Epstein will like the work. If he accepts finishing this 
way, I will finish it may be even this coming week, providing, I can work 10-12 hours a day. I do not want to work even 
longer hours, because you are not sharp and still you can spoil delicate balance required for this finish. 
> Do you want me to send you some photos? I will be glad to. The column still, has to be viewed from all sides. 
> Kindly, 
> 
> Brandon 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030221 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026141.txt,"Effectively the banks that could compete and have the size and access to
cheaper foreign exchange funding as well as trade finance capabilities are
Raiffeisen, Ukrsib, Credit Agricole and OTP accounting for 12.6% collectively.

Raiffeisen is engaged in dealing with the retail business and the work out of
their NPLs. However, its long-serving CEO Mr Lavrenchuk is rumoured to
become the Governor of NBU and the management team will be replaced with
expatriates from Raiffeisen’s head office. This move will create a major upset in
the bank’s structure and may result to a major change in strategy with a
considerable time to be needed for bringing the bank back to smooth operation.

Alfa who have bought over Unicredito’s Ukrsots bank (6.5% combined) and
who have historically being engaged in retail lending and large corporates
should continue to pursue this business and should devote resources to the
merger with Ukrsots and manage the business lending that should take some
time to grasp. Rumours say that they will initiate the merger process in not less
than a year and already they have discontinued new business lending servicing
existing customers only.

FUIB have been given a plan to recapitalise the bank or decrease their assets
and therefore they are out of the business for the time being.

ING and Citi are providing large corporate and investment banking services
only.

= Improving quality of borrowers

Following the improvement in collecting taxes and the enactment of new
legislation, and therefore decreasing the non-declared income, as well as the
significant increase in commodity prices and the increase in disposable income,
credit affordability has increased among business and individuals.

= Increasing loans and deposits that suffice for the credit growth

Evolution of loans and deposits 2015-2021

Dec Dec. Mar. Jun. Sep Dec.

Re 3rd Ri
Act. Sed Review. Act. Proj. Proj Proj bese aht Proj Proj Proj Proj. Proj

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
SR SR

Foreign currency 548 494 494 493 485 507 508 506 558 596 634 657

Credit to the economy 1,013 1,003 1,003 987 1,023 1,081 1,077 1,081 1,172 1,286 1407 1,554
ti
(In billions of U.S. dollars) 22.9 184 18.2 17.9 17.3 175 17.5 16.9 18.3 19.3 20.5 212

| Banks' liabilities 711 788 788 783 802 845 875 872 1,070 1,252 1459 1,641 |

The European prospect of Ukraine that is supported not only politically but
also from the international financial institutions along with the effort of the

8

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026141
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030299.txt,"From: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 2/26/2010 6:41:25 PM
To: Robert D. Critton Jr. iE Jessica Cadwe! |
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles

Attachments: Epstein combined articles.pdf

a Forwarded message ----------

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:01 AM

Subject: Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles

To: ""Alan M. Dershowitz"" [iii Martin Weinberg |

From: >
Date: Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 AM
Subject: Fw: Epstein News Articles

To: jeevacation@gmail.com

To:

From: Michael Reiter/PalmBeach
Date: 08/12/2008 09:33PM
Subject: Epstein News Articles

(See attached file: Epstein combined articles. pdf)
Joyce,

I am looking forward to meeting with you on Wednesday. Please find below (and attached as a PDF file),
some background information for your reference. Thanks for agreeing to have this discussion.

Regards,

Mike

Palm Beach Post Editorial #1

He was over 50. And they were girls

By Elisa Cramer

HASH(0x5fa474)

Friday, August 04, 2006

If the women whom Palm Beach police say a part-time town resident invited to his home
and paid for sex acts were, in fact, women, the solicitation charge against Jeffrey Epstein
might feel more sufficient. But, according to police records, they weren't. He was over

50. And they were girls. 14. 15.16.17-year-old girls. That should count for something -

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030299
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027764.txt,"Source Entr: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2019-06-131111 
on 2019-06-13 at 08.49.53.ichat 
Service: iMessage 
Start Time: 06/11/19 08:59:38 PM (582004778) 
End Time: 06/13/19 04:42:38 PM (582162158) 
Last Message ID: 30651 
Chat Room: 
Participants: jee, _________________________________ 
Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com, 
Messages - 
Sender: 
Time: 06/11/19 08:59:38 PM (582004778) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 197410CC-B951-4559-B48F-238E618E6849 
Message: Dude: I told you--CCP blinked 
Sender: 
Time: 06/11/19 08:59:43 PM (582004783) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: A05855EF-0097-4EDD-A49F-8AE777D8A60E 
Message: Massive win 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/12/19 02:36:09 AM (582024969) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 773115FB-C321-4579-8D79-0D63C72F7388 
Message: good work, get the video of hong kong into china . that's the in 
Sender: MENEM.= 
Time: 06/12/19 06:34:15 AM (582039255) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EFD8BD70-510B-442A-B7A4-AB4DE3AACA13 
Message: Yes yes yes 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027764 
Sender: 
Time: 06/12/19 06:45:07 AM (582039907) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: E2740150-9228-43BD-83F9-64D9E2FF3BD6 
Message: 3 pm to 5 pm shoot?? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/12/19 06:45:20 AM (582039920) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EC909038-C865-41D6-ABCE-EE07BOD13792 
Message: Yes 
Sender: 
Time: 06/12/19 12:01:36 PM (582058896) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: A4F52668-981E-4D95-BDD0-950CEF23D8EC 
Message: 10 minutes out 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/12/19 12:10:37 PM (582059437) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7856A1B7-5F08-41B9-8D89-436058058430 
Message: K 
Sender: 
Time: 06/12/19 12:13:00 PM (582059580) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 12A58C95-3979-46E2-9074-03454EC717DE 
Message: I'm here can u get your guys to the door 
Sender: 
Time: 06/12/19 01:27:54 PM (582064074) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027765 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: D9CFFF48-0828-43E2-B2BF-0E157356B316 
Message: We r ready 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 02:43:42 AM (582111822) 
Flags: 1150981 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: D5D43664-C1B0-487D-ADOO-DO9C091789D3 
Message: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/13/oil-jumps-more-than-3percent-on-reports-of-
tanker-incident-in-the-gulf-of-oman.html 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 05:46:59 AM (582122819) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 47B11DB4-27E7-476E-B250-AB9FE02A3C09 
Message: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is an independent agency of 
the United States government that protects the funds of the little guy FDIC insurance 
is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. Since the FDIC 
was established in 1933, no depositor has lost a penny of FDIC-insured funds. FDIC 
insurance covers all deposit accounts, including: Checking accounts Savings 
accounts Money market deposit accounts Certificates of deposit FDIC insurance 
does not cover the BIG GUYS ie, other financial products and services that banks may 
offer, such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, life insurance policies, annuities or 
securities. The standard insurance amount is $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, 
for each account ownership categor 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 05:47:15 AM (582122835) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2AD63804-2017-4F06-BE3F-91E68457E257 
Message: straits of hormuz right on schedule 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 05:49:53 AM (582122993) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8BCCE397-3390-4362-8F09-E9C2E05ED14F 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027766 
Message: Torpedoed ! 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 07:05:48 AM (582127548) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 4E489787-F2FA-4B51-9673-569978D37A36 
Message: i said mid june I two days early 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 11:02:37 AM (582141757) 
Flags: 1150981 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EA7AA6F9-8855-4D1B-BF75-ABDO7E8545E4 
Message: 2 for 2. 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 11:02:38 AM (582141758) 
Flags: 1150981 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 71EDCC4B-45A5-403C-AFB6-19756A1CA458 
Message: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/13/us/politics/kellyanne-conway-hatch-act.html 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 11:03:09 AM (582141789) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 3FA52BC2-186A-44C7-B309-63E98E8051DF 
Message: You said she had no where to go 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 11:31:20 AM (582143480) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: BCB66FBE-E179-49ED-82C7-54C9C4A6COAF 
Message: Dump back to campaign 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027767 
Time: 06/13/19 01:22:10 PM (582150130) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 5651DE9D-2A8B-46FF-95ED-7511C6BC766E 
Message: You my chins guy hete want to speak? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 01:22:16 PM (582150136) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 89F4D8DD-C31A-40E5-AlEC-5A73D398EC1D 
Message: China 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 01:26:50 PM (582150410) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 39649D85-E0ED-418E-B86B-13C5D2EE6976 
Message: ?? 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 01:28:15 PM (582150495) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 3A478DD5-5374-46E7-A336-F875F933E0EE 
Message: Yes yes yes 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 01:28:22 PM (582150502) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: OD8C91E6-5B1F-4D09-AA1F-A8B95BA46160 
Message: Where is he 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 01:28:37 PM (582150517) 
Flags: 1085445 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027768 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 498E1321-48B0-4C66-AC2D-9EC913D9F52A 
Message: Call now 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 01:57:08 PM (582152228) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 5BD7C2D7-8413-4840-92CA-FBEB1AF92022 
Message: Can I get name and cell phone 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 02:35:01 PM (582154501) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 05966503-5D13-4B16-846D-DEB6AB1A3OBC 
Message: He wanted to be careful as he doesn't want your contact known 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 02:35:15 PM (582154515) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 6BD87B81-1138-4AD7-B642-B107FB065C54 
Message: I'll figure it out 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 02:35:17 PM (582154517) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: BBC14E60-0099-41BB-9D51-8BCA7C239697 
Message: Smart 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 02:35:20 PM (582154520) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027769 
GUID: ODDC808E-07F7-47CC-B221-B3946C94EFOC 
Message: Smart 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 02:35:24 PM (582154524) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: DB32DD33-652F-48D3-B4BE-D166900087EC 
Message: Smart 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 02:42:52 PM (582154972) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 53BA19D3-F569-40BF-912D-B64850724AFB 
Message: Please review your lawyers document!! 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 02:44:21 PM (582155061) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: F7F909FA-FABO-44B7-8861-9CEF9A7374CB 
Message: Dan and I did 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 04:36:10 PM (582161770) 
Flags: 1150981 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: ACF1FA7D-BC33-45F9-B018-3787A8B9926D 
Message: https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/13/alan-dershowitz-trump-biden/ 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 04:36:23 PM (582161783) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 1684C9FO-DO6B-4B9A-A847-3204E46AEE74 
Message: What a Dick 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027770 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 04:36:45 PM (582161805) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 935AFCCC-71E7-48CE-96B4-CA10699326F4 
Message: He was basically the guys attorney !!! 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 04:37:35 PM (582161855) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 4E722469-B314-4664-8CD5-B51A93224FCC 
Message: major dick 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 04:38:48 PM (582161928) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: OCEDF2FD-57A1-468E-84EE-F9CF7248746F 
Message: And It will garner ZERO love on Martha's Vinyard 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 04:38:57 PM (582161937) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: A0940E6A-1F9B-4B39-91B4-73DCCBB2FD98 
Message: you can be sure he is telling biden all that he knows ] 
Sender: __________________ 
Time: 06/13/19 04:39:25 PM (582161965) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7765CA14-925D-4FA8-Al2A-4D7AF309FCD3 
Message: 100000% 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 04:40:03 PM (582162003) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027771 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: C62EF51B-4D17-4C3C-936A-5778A46E1BBD 
Message: he will say trump never paid him , he wasn't his atony just talked to him 
so not bound. 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 04:40:09 PM (582162009) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: FED51746-CB2C-4D63-BBOD-163717E2ODF6 
Message: attorney 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 04:41:03 PM (582162063) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 4DB2D686-CF02-4C48-A381-21834B56332A 
Message: The worst 
Sender: __________________ 
Time: 06/13/19 04:41:18 PM (582162078) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8E12EF77-5F36-4E26-BA04-68552BFC6CD5 
Message: This is as bad as his Qatar sell out 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 04:41:47 PM (582162107) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: F88734CB-3CB2-455B-9345-E8AA94078881 
Message: there is a new yorker article about to come out that is devastating to him 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 04:42:06 PM (582162126) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027772 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 27AF662E-8D5C-4B74-80A7-5722BBB87DD7 
Message: That's why he made this move 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 06/13/19 04:42:10 PM (582162130) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 597E1EC8-F6F0-4DB5-8913-8F1B96A785EA 
Message: yup 
Sender: 
Time: 06/13/19 04:42:38 PM (582162158) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 933DA4C8-AB7A-4FD1-9000-FF2988B3DCDC 
Message: He is dumb but not stupid 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027773 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025448.txt,"Time: 03/29/19 09
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F/6F8953-CF

252:51 AM (575571171)

B4-4202-BFC4-1351EC2DAAA9

Message: Are you in Paris?

sender: iy

Time: 03/29/19 09
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

252:56 AM (575571176)

GUID: E2E4E280-E524-4B3B-B96F-C249A556131F

Message: Excited for my present..THANK YOU! !!!!

Sender: e:jeeitun
Time: 03/29/19 09
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

s@gmail.com

2:58:48 AM (575571528)

GUID: 2E289A9C-F3AA-4C29-9

Message: Yes

Sender: e:jeeitun
Time: 03/30/19 08
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

s@gmail.com

2:34:48 AM (575652888)

E32-658036BBBDOC

4

GUID: 3C6BF367-E5

8E-4B23-8D66-86AD5B

Message: He built

iCESE

the pyramid

sender:

Time: 03/30/19 10
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

2:17:22 AM (575659042)

GUID: E5SB6662C-F537-4BB/-82B3-3751FFC7FC34

Message: THANK YOU FOR My PRESENT!!! !!!!

Sender: +13108737

Time: 03/30/19 10

937)

2:17:23 AM (575659043)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025448
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017607.txt,"Page 4 of 31
104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *64
then made a series of recommendations for all criminal justice agencies, including the police, prosecutors, and the courts. |!
The recommendations were designed to allow crime victims to receive information about, and to participate in, criminal cases.

In its most far-reaching recommendation, the Task Force proposed amending the U.S. Constitution to protect victims’ rights. !*

The proposed amendment would have built on existing constitutional rights for criminal defendants by extending similar rights
to crime victims. |?

After the publication of the report, crime victims’ advocates secured the passage of a series of state constitutional and
legislative reforms. These measures guaranteed victims' rights in the criminal process, such as the right to be notified of court
proceedings, to attend those proceedings, and to speak at appropriate points in the process, such as plea bargaining and
sentencing. The measures were embodied in state statutes and, in more than thirty states, state constitutional ""bills of rights"" for

15

crime victims. '4 While many of the measures had narrow participatory rights, some of the amendments also contained

more open-ended language, promising victims a right to fair treatment ""throughout the criminal justice process."" !°

After successfully passing many state constitutional amendments, crime victims' rights advocates sought to achieve the Task
Force's broadest recommendation: to secure protection for victims' rights in the U.S. Constitution. In 1996, victims’ advocates
proposed a Victims' Rights Amendment in a Rose Garden ceremony attended by President Bill Clinton. !7 The proposed
amendment contained a list of rights for crime victims, largely paralleling the rights contained in state victims' rights [*65]
amendments. '® Congress considered the amendment several times, but it never obtained the requisite two-thirds support in
both houses to secure the Amendment's approval. |° Critics quarreled not so much with the goals of the amendment but rather
with the necessity of constitutionalizing such rights. 7°

B. THE CRIME VICTIMS! RIGHTS ACT

Unable to obtain the necessary supermajority to pass a federal constitutional amendment, in April 2004, crime victims’ rights
advocates decided to focus on federal legislation protecting crime victims. In exchange for backing off from their efforts to
pass a constitutional amendment, crime victims' advocates received near-universal congressional support for a ""broad and

'l See id. at 56-82.

2 Td. at 114.

3 Td. at 114-15.

4 For a map depicting the states with (and without) such amendments, see State Victim Rights Amendments, Nat'l Victims' Constitutional

Amendment Passage, http://goo.gl/znI4YW (last visited Nov. 26, 2013); for discussion, see infra Part [V.D (discussing legislative reforms in a
number of states).

5 See, e.g., Cal. Const. art. I, § 28; Mich. Const. art. I, § 24; N.C. Const. art. I, § 37. For a detailed discussion of how one state constitutional
amendment is intended to operate, see generally Paul G. Cassell, Balancing the Scales of Justice: The Case for and the Effects of Utah's
Victims' Rights Amendment, 1994 Utah L. Rev. 1373.

16 E.g., Ariz. Const. art. IL, § 2.1(A)(1); Mich. Const. art. I, § 24(1); Tex. Const. art. I, § 30(a)(1); see Cal. Const. art. I, § 28(b)(1)
(""throughout the criminal or juvenile justice process"").

'7 John M. Broder, Clinton Calls for Victims' Rights in Constitution, L.A. Times, June 26, 1996, at Al. For detailed discussions of the
legislative efforts, see Paul G. Cassell, Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of
the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 835, 847-50.

18 See Cassell, supra note 17, at 848-49. For the pros and cons of the amendment as originally introduced, compare Paul G. Cassell,
Barbarians at the Gates? A Reply to the Critics of the Victims' Rights Amendment, 1999 Utah L. Rev. 479 [hereinafter Cassell, Barbarians at
the Gates?], and Steven J. Twist, The Crime Victims' Rights Amendment and Two Good and Perfect Things, /999 Utah L. Rev. 369, with
Robert P. Mosteller, The Unnecessary Victims' Rights Amendment, 1999 Utah L. Rev. 443. For a more recent discussion of a newer version
of the amendment, see Paul G. Cassell, The Victims' Rights Amendment: A Sympathetic, Clause-by-Clause Analysis, 5 Phoenix L. Rev. 301]

(2012).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017607
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024075.txt,"Profits Not Shared in Proportion to Contributed Capital

The capital contribution of the General Partner will represent only a small portion of the Fund’s
capital. Limited Partners may invest greater amounts and may receive a proportionately
smaller amount of the profits of the Fund than the General Partner. The General Partner may
have an incentive to make investments that are riskier or more speculative than if the General
Partner received allocations on a basis identical to that of the Limited Partners in the Fund or
was compensated on a basis not tied to the performance of the Fund.

Investment Opportunities

The General Partner may in certain circumstances allocate investment opportunities to prior
funds or potential successor funds. Allocation of investment opportunities will be made in
good faith by the General Partner. There can be no assurance that the allocation of investment
opportunities by the General Partner will not give rise to conflicts of interest between the
investors of the respective funds.

Long-Term Investment
An investment in the Fund is a long-term commitment, and there is no assurance of any
distribution to the Limited Partners prior to or upon liquidation of the Fund.

Illiquidity of Limited Partner Interests

The Limited Partner Interests are highly illiquid. There is no public market for the Limited
Partner Interests and none is expected to develop. Limited Partner Interests in the Fund may
not be assigned, transferred or encumbered without the prior written consent of the General
Partner. Voluntary withdrawals of Limited Partner Interests are not permitted, except in
limited circumstances where necessary to comply with laws or regulations applicable to a
Limited Partner. Consequently, a Limited Partner may not be able to liquidate their investment
in the event of a change in circumstances or for other reasons and, therefore, must be prepared
to bear the risks of owning its interest in the Fund for an extended period of time. The Limited
Partner Interests will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), or under the various “Blue Sky” or securities laws of the state or jurisdiction
of residence of any Limited Partner of the Fund. The Limited Partner Interests are being offered
only to “accredited investors” under an exemption in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder and exemptions under the various
applicable “Blue Sky” and other state securities laws.

Bridge Financings and Guarantees

From time to time, the Fund may lend to portfolio companies on a short-term, unsecured basis
or guaranty portfolio company obligations in anticipation of a future issuance of equity or long-
term debt securities. Such bridge loans would typically be convertible into a more permanent,
long-term security; however, for reasons not always in the Fund’s control, such long-term
securities may not issue and such bridge loans or guarantees may remain outstanding. In such
event, the interest rate on such loans or compensation for such guaranty (if any) may not
adequately reflect the risk associated with the unsecured position taken or guaranty given by
the Fund.

64 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024075
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012388.txt,"even acted improperly -- by refusing to comply with a statute he believed was unconstitutional. The
Court in Myers can be seen to have implicitly vindicated the view that the President may réfuse to
comply with a statute that limits his constitutional powers if he believes it is unconstitutional. As
Attorney General Civiletti stated in a 1980 opinion,

Myers is very nearly decisive of the issue [of Presidential denial of the validity of statutes].
Myers holds that the President's constitutional duty does not require him to execute
unconstitutional statutes; nor does it require him to execute them provisionally, against the
day that they are declared unconstitutional by the courts. He cannot be required by statute
to retain postmasters against his will unless and until a court says that he may lawfully let
them go. If the statute is unconstitutional, it is unconstitutional from the start.

The Attorney General's Duty to Defend and Enforce Constitutionally Objectionable Legislation, 4A
Op. O.L.C. 55, 59 (1980).

7. The fact that a sitting President signed the statute in question does not change this analysis. The
text of the Constitution offers no basis for distinguishing bills based on who signed them; there is no
constitutional analogue to the principles of waiver and estoppel. Moreover, every President since
Eisenhower has issued signing statements in which he stated that he would refuse to execute
unconstitutional provisions. See annotations of attached signing statements. As we noted in our
memorandum on Presidential signing statements, the President ""may properly announce to Congress
and to the public that he will not enforce a provision of an enactment he is signing. If so, then a signing
statement that challenges what the President determines to be an unconstitutional encroachment on his
power, or that announces the President's unwillingness to enforce (or willingness to litigate) such a
provision, can be a valid and reasonable exercise of Presidential authority."" Memorandum for Bernard
N. Nussbaum, Counsel to the President, from Walter Dellinger, Assistant Attorney General, Office of
Legal Counsel at 4 (Nov. 3, 1993). (Of course, the President is not obligated to announce his
reservations in a signing statement; he can convey his views in the time, manner, and form of his
choosing.) Finally, the Supreme Court recognized this practice in INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983):
the Court stated that ""it is not uncommon for Presidents to approve legislation containing parts which
are objectionable on constitutional grounds"" and then cited the example of President Franklin
Roosevelt's memorandum to Attorney General Jackson, in which he indicated his intention not to
implement an unconstitutional provision in a statute that he had just signed. Id. at 942 n.13. These
sources suggest that the President's signing of a bill does not affect his authority to decline to enforce
constitutionally objectionable provisions thereof.

In accordance with these propositions, we do not believe that a President is limited to choosing
between vetoing, for example, the Defense Appropriations Act and executing an unconstitutional
provision in it. In our view, the President has the authority to sign legislation containing desirable
elements while refusing to execute a constitutionally defective provision.

We recognize that these issues are difficult ones. When the President's obligation to act in accord
' with the Constitution appears to be in tension with his duty to execute laws enacted by Congress,
questions are raised that go to the heart of our constitutional structure. In these circumstances, a
President should proceed with caution and with respect for the obligation that each of the branches
shares for the maintenance of constitutional government.

Walter Dellinger
Assistant Attorney General

Brief Description of Attached Materials

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012388
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033161.txt,"director of the Palm Beach County Education Commission touted the area’s
benefits. I surveyed real estate and office space surrounded by miles of
water without once having my foot stepped on by a tourist. You can see how
all this might sway someone who’s on the fence.

Exploring the sugary beaches of South Florida, one starts to wonder why
Wall Streeters would be on the fence at all. Between the smiling locals and
the shopping on Worth Avenue, the Hiaasen-esque stereotypes recede.
What remains are the facts: Take-home pay is higher, commutes are
shorter, and it’s just as fabulous as Manhattan, at least for four months of
the year. Meanwhile, no one in Florida even owns an ice scraper. With the
Internet allowing more and more money managers to perform their work
from nearly anywhere, there are few reasons not to make the move.

“Initially, it was a way to play golf and keep the wife and kids happy,” says
Brett Langbert, managing director and head of sales at I.A. Englander & Co.
“But once we moved down, it became a quality-of-life issue. There are
unlimited things the kids can do outside. I have to tell you, my wife and I
are so happy we haven’t had to go to one of those indoor bouncy-castle
places since we got here.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033161
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026508.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 9/12/2018 6:15:20 PM
To: Larry Sunmers aS |
Subject: Re: This morning

https://www.cato-unbound.org/2016/12/13/jason-mcdaniel/ranked-choice-voting-likely-means-lower-turnout-

more-errors _ difficult to judge one way or the other. turnout , does not reflect ethnicity .? stable does not
mean same. . looking at the argumnents on both sides , I would have to conclude in your words a big
nothingburger

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:01 AM, Larry Summers <> wrote:

More than u may want to know
Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office a:

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: ""Maskin, Eric""
Date: September 11, 2018 at 10:24:21 PM EDT

To: LS <

Subject: RE: This morning

I believe there are, but don’t know how careful they are. I will try to get you references.

From: LHS
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:23 PM
To: Maskin, Eric
Ce: lhsoffice
Subject: Re: This morning

Are there empirical studies on turnout.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office je

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers

www.larrysummers.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026508
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015216.txt,"“It'’ s charming,” I reply, “but what are you gonna do if the metal
detector goes off at the airport?”

| leave them giggling in the elevator as | get off on a floor where
I' ve heard there would be lots of action. | follow one group, but only the
couple in front really knows where they’ re going. But they happen to be
on the way to their own room, and when they get there, they go in, close
the door, and we are all left out in the corridor, looking like a perplexed
ant farm. Everybody turns around. | am now at the front of the line, so | let
them all pass by me as they head in the opposite direction, strolling
briskly, except for the one-legged man with the roller skate and crutches,
who is gliding gracefully along the carpet. Passersby are asked, in vain,

“Where’ s the party?” We finally find a room with a porn photo on the
door, which is slightly open.

Inside, there are around fifty people in semi-darkness. Exhibitionists
and voyeurs, together again. Here a blow job, there a copulation,
everywhere an undulating juiciness. There is an unspoken
homophobia—no man is relating sexually to another man—but there is
lots of lesbian libido. In order to keep a low profile, | have ripped several
pages out of my notebook and folded them in half, so that | can take

notes unobtrusively.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015216
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021544.txt,"To: Miami From: e York @

Re: 31E-MM-108062, 05/31/2008

there to interview

stated that she would speak to her attorney and
understood the consequences of not showing up to the grand jury
Agents provided contact information for
should she later want to contact agents regarding this matter.

It should be noted i oe call sal
later that same day and stated she wanted to know why agents
wanted to talk to her so tha turn could consult her

attorney in this matter. SA replied that
regarding JEFFREY EPSTEIN. then asked

[was then referred to the printed material that
was included with the subpoena regarding her travel and answered

; The return of service for the Grand Jury Subpoena was
placed in a 1-A envelope.

+4

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021544 ©
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027616.txt,"Time: 03/28/19 02:41:46 AM (575458906)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: DF2692AA-A4 3E-4ACA-9A56-BA630B505772

Message: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6858701/Steve-Bannon-says-NO-

Democrat-capable-beating-Trump-2020.htm1

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/28/19 02:42:26 AM (575458946)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: SBBSBOE4-8593-4D9B-AF7D-F907B848729A

Message: SDNY. rs

Sender:
Time: 03/28/19 02:52:56 AM (575459576)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No

GUID: 035B67D0-8921-4892-85ED-B7B2C32B051A

Message: I think folks may actually see that as

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/28/19 02:53:44 AM (575459624)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: CO7CF376-3ECC-4FBC-BOBD-AC 65435 9BCO!I

|

Message: Understood ,- I thought you

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/28/19 02:54:01 AM (575459641)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: A7DOB/74B-14B3-4E8D-8388-9E31778EDD41

Message: He was de balled. And done well

Time: 03/28/19 02:54:24 AM (575459664)

""witch hunt'

the punch. , the mueller report the head fake

now since this so clean

Were great on Anderson

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027616
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024756.txt,"KR L
PI L

AC EL
CA TA

Cannabis Investment Report | December 2017

Stock Price Performance of Publicly Traded Cannabis-Related Companies

The following chart shows the stock price performance of publicly traded cannabis-related com-
panies since September 30, 2016. As shown in the chart, the stock price performance of cannabis-
related companies trading on Canadian markets received a boost from the announcement of the pro-
posed recreational cannabis legislation in Canada by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and, more recently,
from Constellation Brands investment in Canopy Growth. Similarly, the continuing positive price per-
formance of cannabis-related companies trading on U.S. markets has not been slowed by the election of
Donald Trump as President and the selection of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General of the United States
(two events that were viewed by many as potentially having a negative impact on the U.S. cannabis

industry).
Global Cannabis Stock Price Performance
1500%
1300%
1100% Canadian Prime Minister
° ' announces plans to
Sessions confirmed legalize recreational
900% as U.S. Attorney cannabis Constellation Brands’

General investment in
700% Canopy Growth

Trump
é elected as
ae U.S. President

300%

100%

-100%

Sep 16 Nov 16 Jan 17 Mar 17 May 17 Jul 17 Sep 17 Nov 17
—— S&P 500 Nasdaq/NYSE Cannabis Index —— OTC Cannabis Index
—— TSX/TSXV Cannabis Index —— CSE Cannabis Index —— ASX Cannabis Index

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence

Capital Raised by Publicly Traded Cannabis-Related Companies

The following table shows the amount of capital (equity and debt) raised by cannabis-related compa-
nies traded on the U.S., Canadian and Australian stock markets in the twelve months ended Septem-
ber 30, 2017. While more than $1.3 billion was raised, the data indicates that relatively few companies
were able to raise capital, given the aggregate number of publicly traded cannabis-related companies,
and the amount raised per transaction was small, supporting the assertion that the market is still driven
primarily by retail investors.

120 © 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024756
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020882.txt,"Entitlement Spending: Observations from Previous Slide

e Entitlement revenue was $0.87 trillion, yet entitlement
spending was $1.98 trillion in F2010.

e Entitlement spending exceeded entitlement revenue by
129% in F2010.

e Social Security (ex. Trust Fund interest income) accounted
for 73% of dedicated entitlement revenue yet only 36% of
entitlement spending in F2010 while Medicare accounted for
21% of revenue and 23% of spending and Medicaid
accounted for 0% of revenue and 14% of spending.

KP
i USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 81

Entitlement Spending: Clarification On

‘Unfunded’ / ‘Net Responsibilities’...

There is debate about the semantics of using words like unfunded / net
responsibilities to describe the financial status of entitlement programs like Social
Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

‘Unfunded’ — We define ‘unfunded’ liabilities for Social Security and Medicare as
the present value of future expenditures in excess of dedicated future revenue.
We call Social Security and Medicare ‘partially unfunded’ entitlement programs
as their future expenditures are projected to exceed dedicated future revenue.

e ‘Net Responsibilities’ — USA Inc. does not record these ‘unfunded’ financial
commitments as explicit liabilities on balance sheet, owing to Federal accounting
standards.""

— USA Inc.’s Dept. of Treasury calls these commitments ‘net responsibilities’
or ‘net expenditures’ in its annual Financial Report of the U.S. Government.

e Medicaid — We view Medicaid as an ‘unfunded’ liability as there is no dedicated
revenue source to match expected expenses in our financial analysis. Medicaid
is jointly funded on a pay-as-you go basis by Federal and State general tax
revenue.

P Note: 1) per Dept. of Treasury, “2004 Financial Report of the United States Government.”
(@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 82

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020882
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030808.txt,"Eye on the Market July 11, 2011

J.P Morgan

Topics: Portfolios, US corporate profits and the Twilight of the Gods (in the US, Europe, China and the IEA)

Here’s what our U.S. Balanced portfolio looks like right now’.
This week’s note reviews some of the factors that affect these
allocations: healthy private sector profits, problems left
over from the recession, and interventions by the world’s
legislatures, treasuries, central banks and multilateral
agencies. This latter group reminds me of the ancient Greek
Gods: they are very powerful, but sometimes flawed, as their
interventions in the world did not always work as planned.
We are getting closer to the Twilight of the Gods, a time when
they are either running out of ammunition, or the ability to use
it without causing even more problems. If so, the private
sector will have to recover on its own. The consequence of
these cross-currents: we invest in equities, but hold 10%-15%
less than what we normally would at this point of the business
cycle, and are positioning for a single-digit year on equities.

PROFITS

High Yield, Core Bonds,
Leveraged 8%

Inflation, 2%

Cash, 3%

Loans, ;
Structured Public equity
Credit, 10% 36%
Emerging JPMUS
Market FX, 5% Balanced
Diversified Model Portfolio
Hedge Funds,

6%
RealEstate, Single Strategy
3% Hard Assets, Hedge Funds
4% 18%
Source: J.P. Morgan Private Bank, as of July 2011.
These portfolios may notbe suitable for allinvestors & are shown for
illustrative purposes only

The primary (and perhaps sole) justification for carrying the levels of risk shown above relates to corporate profits. As
shown below, profit margins have reached levels not seen in decades. The challenge, which we have discussed many times
before: what is driving these margins’? One useful way to deconstruct profits is to measure them from peak to peak, and
analyze what changed. As shown in the first chart, S&P 500 profit margins increased by ~1.3% from 2000 to 2007. There are a
lot of moving parts in the margin equation, but as shown in the second chart, reductions in wages and benefits explain the
majority of the net improvement in margins. This trend has continued; as we have shown several times over the last two
years, US labor compensation is now at a 50-year low relative to both company sales and US GDP (see EoTM April 26, 2011).

S&P 500 pre-tax margins
Excluding financials, large-cap proxy used before1976
16%
15%
14%
13%
12%
11%
10%
9%
8%
1%
6%
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Source: Corporate reports, Empirical Research Partners. Past performance
is notindicative of future results.

1.3% increase

OC?

Labor cost reductions driving the margin expansion
Peak to peak change in margins, 2000-2007, S&P 500 constituents

14%
1.2%
1.0%
0.8%
0.6%
0.4%
0.2%
0.0%

Total increase in
pre-tax margins

Reduction in wages and
benefits as a percentage
ofrevenue

Source: Standard & Poor's, Empirical Research Partners.

Last week’s train wreck of a labor report included the dour news that labor compensation is now firmly negative in real
terms. Why is US labor compensation so low? The lingering excess labor supply from the recession is one reason, but the 2
billion people in Asia joining the global labor force over the last two decades is another. As shown on next page, EM wages for
production workers remain well below US levels*. Another factor helping profit margins: increased US imports of intermediate
goods from Asia. As shown in the accompanying chart, imports from Asia have been rising, and over the same time frame,

Asian import prices only increased at around 1% per year.

We use these portfolios to manage assets for clients who give us discretion over their funds, and to provide recommendations to those who
don’t. This is one of several model portfolios we manage globally. They differ by jurisdiction, risk tolerance, tax treatment, eligibility to
purchase vehicles designated for qualified purchasers, and other factors.

* Empirical Research Partners does more work on corporate profits than anyone else we’ve seen. This section draws on research that Mike
Goldstein at Empirical shared with us at a recent investment committee meeting.

> A recent study from Boston Consulting Group maintains that the gap between China and the US will close in 5 years. BCG believes that
with Chinese wages growing at 15%-20% per year, US wages growing at 3% per year, higher productivity in the US and rising shipping and
inventory costs, the China advantage will disappear within the decade. Some of these assumptions seem aggressive to apply in perpetuity.

1
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030808
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016519.txt,"Page 10 of 42
103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *861

When resource constraints remain, however, they force officials to choose which cases get priority. That creates more
opportunity for biases and favoritism to play a role in determining which cases to charge and which to forgo. That is especially
so with crimes in which evidence development is more costly, so officials have to decide whether to invest scarce resources in
those that require substantial investigative efforts. Both sexual assault and police violence cases often require larger-scale
investments to develop evidence sufficient for prosecution. Failures to make those investments are common reasons for non-

prosecution in both contexts. >?

Il. MECHANISMS OF PROSECUTORIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

For a range of reasons and across a range of contexts, public prosecutors’ failures to enforce criminal law have been of
sufficient concern to lead contemporary justice systems to devise checks against unjustified underenforcement. Approaches
take three basic forms: (1) limited authority for private parties to initiate or participate in criminal prosecutions; (2) independent
review of initial non-prosecution decisions, upon petition from a [*862] victim; and (3) multiple, mdependent public
prosecution agencies with independent authority to bring charges for the same wrongdoing. Outside the United States, the first
two options predominate; their expansion in recent years is a direct consequence of broader reforms to expand crime victims'
rights. °° U.S. jurisdictions, however, rely almost wholly on the third model. Despite having adopted otherwise expansive
victims’ rights laws in recent decades in response to an influential movement for crime victims' rights, state and federal laws
consistently and explicitly avoid granting any formal authority to private parties, or courts, over criminal charging. The next
three Sections provide an overview of these options, where they exist. Largely with regard to U.S. policy choices only, they
also suggest reasons that one model prevailed over others.

A. Victim Rights and Private Versus Public Interests

In the wake of victims’ rights movements in North America and Europe, crime victims now have an array of legal nights once
criminal charges are filed. Victims in the U.S. and European jurisdictions now commonly have rights to participate that include
rights to consult with prosecutors, to be notified of and present at court proceedings, and to offer statements at stages such as
hearings on bail, sentencing, and parole. ©!

48 See Daniel Duane, Is It O.K. to Kill Cyclists?, N.Y. Times (Nov. 9, 2013), hitps:/Avww.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/opinion/sundav/is-it-ok-
to-kill-cyclists html (discussing failures to prosecute motor vehicle drivers who injure or kill bicyclists); see also BikeMaps.org,
hittps://bikemaps.org (last visited Oct. 30, 2018) (displaying a crowd-sourced map of locations of cyclist injuries and fatalities).

49 See John F. Decker, Don't Forget to Wear Your Hunter Orange (or Flack Jacket): A Critique on the Lack of Prosecution of Hunting
""Accidents,"" 56.S.C. L. Rev. 135, 166-73 (2004).

© See id.; Duane, supra note 48.

5! Eisenberg, supra note 45, at 893-96 (discussing data from prosecutor interviews). In the contexts Eisenberg describes, prosecutors
typically forgo hate-crime offenses in favor of other charges rather than declining to prosecute altogether. Though the focus here is on
prosecutors, they may not be the key cause of underenforcement. For similar reasons, police may not investigate or arrest in such cases, or if
they do prosecution can be undermined by lax evidence-gathering. Police practices are the focus on much of the scholarship on
underenforcement of certain offenses. Much of the literature on inadequate enforcement of sexual assault crimes focuses on weaknesses in
the police rather than prosecutors. See, e.g., Tuerkheimer, supra note 28, at 1292-99 (discussing evidence of police bias).

2 See, e.g., Alan Blinder, Michael Slager, Officer in Walter Scott Shooting, Gets 20-Year Sentence, N.Y. Times (Dec. 7, 2017),
https ://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/07/us/michael-slager-sentence-walter-scott.html (explaining that an officer pled guilty in federal court
after a 2016 prosecution in state court ended with a hung jury).

3 See Natapoff, supra note 28.

4 See, e.g., id.

% See U.S. Dep't of Justice, United States Attorneys' Manual § 9-27.230 cmt. 1 (1997) (recognizing limited prosecution resources); see also
Human Rights Watch, supra note 22, at 99 (listing ""lack of investigative or prosecutorial resources"" among the most common reasons noted

by the federal Civil Rights Division for declining to prosecute); U.S. Dep't of Justice, FY 2013 Performance Budget: Civil Rights Division 39
(noting that strengthening of civil rights enforcement efforts under the ""Vulnerable People Priority"" policy ""has been reversed because full

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016519
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023929.txt,"CHAPTER 13

MZ
, \
CG@:

i

How the Best Universities
Inadvertently Ruin Our Schools

We have met the enemy, and he is us.
—VWalt Kelly

It should come as no surprise to readers of this book that I never re-
ally liked school. I endured it. I didn’t have the option to quit—an
unthinkable idea in my household. In the end I even wound up with
a Yale degree (all right, an honorary one—but it is printed in Latin).
Truth be told, I did get a real Ph.D., but that was more a testament to
my figuring out how to work the system while avoiding the draft, than
it was a testament to my scholarship or academic prowess.

I became a professor, an unlikely job for someone who hated
school, and I became an unlikely colleague who worked with people
who, by and large, loved school. I spent 35 years of my life as a profes-
sor at the best universities in America, and still I hated school.

Somewhere in the middle of my academic career, about the time
that my kids went to school, I began to think about how learning
worked. (I was trying to develop computers that learned.) Since my
kids also hated school, I began to wonder about why school was the
way it was and why it really had so little to do with learning as I un-
derstood it.

Eventually I realized that I was part of the problem. I readily had
found employment in a world that let me think about interesting
problems all day and work with really smart graduate students. To
pay for this life of the mind, I was required to teach every now and
then. I never really liked teaching for exactly the same reason I didn’t
like being on the other side of the classroom. I didn’t get the point.
I talked. Students listened or at least faked listening, and then there
were grades to be given out based on how well they actually had been
listening. I didn’t like this game any more as a teacher than I had

183

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023929
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017834.txt,"IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

769

Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

where parties agreed that Saudi Arabia
had not been designated state sponsor of
terrorism. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2331 et seq.; 28
U.S.C.A. § 1605(a)(7)(A).

19. International Law <= 10.33

Generally, acts are “discretionary,” for
purposes of the discretionary function ex-
ception to the torts exception of the For-
eign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), if
the acts are performed at the planning
level of government, as opposed to the
operational level. 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 1605(a)(5).

See publication Words and Phras-
es for other judicial constructions
and definitions.

20. International Law <10.33

To fit within the torts exception of the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA),
plaintiffs must come forward with evidence
demonstrating that the defendants’ tor-
tious acts or omissions caused the plain-
tiffs’ injuries. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1605(a)(5).

21. International Law ¢=10.33

To extent that Saudi Arabian Princes’
alleged donations to charities that sup-
ported terrorist organizations were made
in Princes’ personal capacities, Antiterror-
ism Act (ATA) claims arising from such
alleged donations, asserted by survivors of
victims of September 11, 2001 attacks,
were not subject to protection of torts
exception of Foreign Sovereign Immuni-
ties Act (FSIA). 18 U.S.C.A. § 2331 et
seq.; 28 U.S.C.A. § 1605(a)(6).

22. Conspiracy 1.1

Torts 21

In New York, conspiracy and aiding
and abetting are varieties of concerted ac-
tion liability, for which there must be: (1)
an express or tacit agreement to partici-
pate in a common plan or design to commit
a tortious act; (2) tortious conduct by each
defendant; and (8) the commission by one

of the defendants, in pursuance of the
agreement, of an act that constitutes a
tort.

23. Conspiracy ¢=2

Under New York law, liability for con-
spiracy requires an agreement to commit a
tortious act.

24, Torts 21

Under New York law, aiding and
abetting liability requires that the defen-
dant have given substantial assistance or
encouragement to the primary wrongdoer.

25. International Law <-10.43

Antiterrorism Act (ATA) complaint by
survivors of victims of September 11, 2001
attacks, alleging that Saudi Princes con-
tributed to charities that supported al
Qaeda, and that al Qaeda repeatedly and
publicly targeted United States, failed to
allege causal connection sufficient to satis-
fy New York standard for concerted action
liability, for purposes of torts exception of
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
(FSIA), absent allegations from which it
could be inferred that Princes knew chari-
ties were fronts for al Qaeda. 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 23881 et seq.; 28 U.S.C.A. § 1605(a)(6).

26. International Law <-10.43

To allege a causal connection suffi-
cient to invoke the torts exception of the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA),
in connection with a defendant’s contribu-
tions to organizations that are not them-
selves designated terrorists, there must be
some facts presented to support the allega-
tion that the defendant knew the receiving
organization to be a solicitor, collector,
supporter, front or launderer for such an
entity; there must be some facts to support
an inference that the defendant knowingly
provided assistance or encouragement. to
the wrongdoer. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1605(a)(6).

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017834
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031525.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031525
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020869.txt,"Income Statement —

F2010 USA Inc. Revenues + Expenses at a Glance

F2010 Revenue = F2010 USA Inc. Expenses =
$2.2 Trillion $3.5 Trillion

Entitlement

Net Interest
Programs

Payment

Discretionary $196B

One-Time Items
$152B Social
Security

$707B

Other

$208B

Corporate Individual
Income Tax Eine THE Non-Defense
$191B $899B See,
Defense psi i
i 694B
Social $ Medicaid
Insurance Tax $724B

$865B
Unemployment Insurance
+ Other Entitlements
$553B

Note: USA federal fiscal year ends in September; *individual & corporate income taxes include capital gains taxes. Non-

defense discretionary includes federal spending on education, infrastructure, law enforcement, judiciary functions...

KP Source: White House Office of Management and Budget.
i USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 55

Income Statement —

USA Inc. Supported -60% Net Margin in F2010

USA Inc. Profit & Loss Statement, F1995 / F2000 / F2005 / F2010

F1995 .., £2000 ..,F2005 ._,, F2010 Comments
Revenue ($B) $1,352 $2,026 $2,154 On average, revenue grew 3% Y/Y
Y/Y Growth -~- 11% 15% 3% over past 15 years
Individual Income Taxes* $590 $1,005 $927 $899 Largest driver of revenue
% of Revenue 44% 50% 43% 42%
Social Insurance Taxes $484 $653 $794 $865 Payroll tax on Social Security +
% of Revenue 36% 32% 37% 40% Medicare
Corporate Income Taxes* $157 $207 $278 $191 Fluctuates significantly with
% of Revenue 12% 10% 13% 9% economic conditions
Other $120 $161 $154 $208 Includes estate & gift taxes / duties &
% of Revenue 9% 8% 7% 10% fees; relatively stable
Expense ($B) $1,516 $1,789 $2,472 $3,456 ""On average, expense grew 6% YIY
Y/Y Growth = 5% 8% -2% over past 15 years
Entitlement / Mandatory $788 $937 $1,295 $1,984 Significant increase owing to aging
% of Expense 52% 52% bat °7% population + rising healthcare cost
Non-Defense Discretionary $223 $335 $497 $431 Tela screatien dE | fi t
% of Expense 15% 19% 20% 12% ncludes education / law enforcemen
/ transportation...
Wal Expense ~ ~ ~ en Includes discretionary spending on
TARP, GSE id ic stimul
Defense $272 $294 $495 $604 Si fie ‘i eee ina ta sums
% of Expense 18% 16% 20% 20% ignificant increase owing to on-
going War on Terror
Net Interest on Public Debt $232 $223 $184 $196 Decreased owing to historic low
% of Expense 15% 12% 7% 6% interest rates
Surplus / Deficit ($B) -$164 $237 -$318 [_ $1,293 | USA Inc. median net margin
Net Margin (%) -12% 12% -15% 60% between 1995 & 2010 = -8%

Note: USA federal fiscal year ends in September; *individual & corporate income taxes include capital gains taxes. Non-

defense discretionary includes federal spending on education, infrastructure, law enforcement, judiciary functions...

KP Source: White House Office of Management and Budget.
(@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 56

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020869
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027825.txt,"Flags: 1150981
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No

GUID: 4C2AD4B6-16B1-464D-9245-3524B02FA750

Message: https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5537033,00.html

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/26/19 09:43:46 AM (583260226)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 74437FF6-F2C2-48B2-9DC8-AF737D7B0B96

Message: . I've been busy

Sender : ay

Time: 06/26/19 09:55:32 AM (583260932)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 49EF4C95-E800-4E08-974F-ECCA8142CCAF

Message: Wow!!!

Time: 06/26/19 09:55:36 AM (583260936)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 76BDB4B9-F9B8-4111-BAA7-E32FE2F6082C

Message: Wow!!!

Sender: iy

Time: 06/26/19 09:55:39 AM (583260939)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 89B49DAE-2DD0-43E3-9A2C-11DDF19D5A0D

r

Message: Wow!!!

Time: 06/26/19 01:34:43 PM (583274083)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027825
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012363.txt,"TAB 10

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012363
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024965.txt,"questioning and often perplexed, has none of the certainties of a man
born to power. He was a young doctor studying ophthalmology in
London when the accidental death in 1994 of his elder brother, Basil,
an altogether tougher character who was being groomed for the
succession, propelled him somewhat reluctantly onto the political
scene.

The country he came to rule in 2000 seemed backward in an
increasingly globalised and technologically advanced world. His first
reforms were therefore financial and commercial. Mobile phones and
the internet were introduced. Private schools and universities
proliferated. In 2004 private banks and insurance companies were
allowed to operate for the first time, and a stock exchange was
opened in March 2009. A political and economic alliance was forged
with Turkey (and visas abolished), which allowed trade to grow along
that border, benefiting Aleppo. The Old City of Damascus was
revitalised, ancient courtyard houses restored and hotels and
restaurants opened to cater for the growing number of tourists. Before
the crisis erupted, Syria was negotiating to join the World Trade
Organisation and conclude an association agreement with the
European Union.

But Bashar’s years in power seem to have hardened him. He
developed a taste for control -- control over the media, over the
university, over the economy (through cronies such as his
exorbitantly rich cousin Rami Makhlouf), control over society at
large. Free expression is not allowed. Political decision-making is
restricted to a tight circle around the president and security services.
Like his father, Bashar clearly does not like to be pushed around or to
seem to yield to pressure. Even so, many Syrians still support him in
the belief that, as an educated, modern and secular ruler, he is better
placed than most to bring about necessary change.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024965
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020409.txt,"Zod

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

“Looking to capitalize on...” —Transcript of Interview
with General Keith Alexander, Australian Financial
Review, May 8, 2014.

""He can compromise thousands...”--Carol J. Williams,

“NSA leaker Edward Snowden seeks return to U.S., on
his terms,” Los Angeles Times, July 22, 2015

“T am still working for...”-- Barton Gellman, “Edward
Snowden, after months of NSA revelations, says his
mission’s accomplished,” Washington Post, December 23,
2013

“Every facet of Snowden's...”--Janet Reitman, “Snowden
and Greenwald,” Rolling Stone, December 4, 2013

“His hosts and they...”--Richard Byrne Reilly, “Former
KGB general: Snowden is cooperating with Russian
intelligence,” Venture Beats, May 22, 2014

“T would lose all respect...” —Author’s interview with
Michael Hayden. Also, Richard Byrne Reilly, “Former
NSA director: 'I would lose all respect for Russia if they
haven't fully exploited Snowden.” Venture Beats, May
23 2014

“He was put in contact...’”—Der Spiegel interview with
Anatoli Kucherana, “Snowden's Lawyer: ‘Russia Will Not
Hand Him Over’,” Spiegel Online International, June
24, 2013.

“An interview as “great...”-- James Bamford and Tim De
Chant, “Edward Snowden on Cyber Warfare, Nova, PBS.
January 8, 2015

>

“One million dollars for...”—This payment was
revealed in the Sony documents allegedly stolen by
North Korea. They were posted on the Wikileaks

website. Author’s interview with Oliver Stone.

“Putin’s telethon on...”-- Elias Grolla, “Snowden Called in

to Putin’s Telethon. Does That Really Make Him a
Kremlin Pawn?” Foreign Policy, April 17, 2014

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020409
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030272.txt,"Article 2.

NY Daily News
President Obama has right goals on Israeli-

Palestinian peace, but strategy already backfiring

Alan Dershowitz

May 27th 2011 -- Now that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is
back in Israel and President Obama is traveling around Europe, it is
time to assess the effect their dueling speeches have had on the
prospects for peace.

There is one factual conclusion on which the Israelis and the
Palestinians completely agree: following President Obama's recent
speech — and repeated explanation of it — on the Israel-Palestine
conflict, we are further than ever from peace negotiations. Obama has
managed, in one fell swoop, to harden the positions of both sides and
to create distrust of him by Israelis and Palestinians alike.

My criticism of the President is not directed at whether he is pro-
Israel or anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian or anti-Palestinian. In fact, I
believe that his actions have not been motivated by any antagonism
toward the Jewish state. He simply does not understand the dynamics
of Middle East negotiation. I am disappointed in him not because I
support Israel (which I do), but because I support peace based on a
two-state solution. I agree with Obama about his ends, while
disagreeing about his means.

Indeed there is little in the content of the President's statements with
which I disagree. Rather, it is with his negotiating strategy, his
constant need to explain himself, and his utter tone-deafness to the
music, as distinguished from the lyrics.

The President has asked the Israelis to agree to negotiate new borders
based on the 1967 lines, with land swaps. But he did so without
asking the Palestinians to agree to drop their demand that millions of

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030272
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026491.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 6/23/2018 5:25:33 PM 
To: Kathy Ruemmler [ 
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: 
exactly my view, on facebook I thought you might look at the recent internet and privacy opinions and pose 
some open questions. to be discussed . mark wants to bring the internet to the rest of the world. . and 
healthcare. . his wife is nice but boring. . what do you see as the challegnes what does she or he see. 
. social 
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <_________________________> wrote: 
Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process 
violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply. 
On Jun 23, 2018, at 12:01 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
i htink weak thoughts? 
----------Forwarded message---------- 
From: Steve Bannon < 
Date: Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM 
Subject: Fwd: Re: 
To: ""jeevacation@gmail.com"" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Big deal 
Begin forwarded message: 
Resent-From: <111> 
From: ""Rivkin, David"" < 
Date: June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT 
To: Steve Bannon <> 
Subject: Fwd: Re: 
Here it is. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Grossman, Andrew M"" < 
Date: June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT 
To: ""Rivkin, David"" 
Subject: Re: 
Mueller's Fruit of the Poisonous Tree 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026491 
It makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that 
attended its origin in 2016. 
By 
David B. Rivkin Jr. and 
Elizabeth Price Foley 
June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET 
414 COMMENTS 
Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation may face a serious legal obstacle: It is tainted by 
antecedent political bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department's 
inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communications, the report says, were ""not only indicative of a 
biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take action to impact a presidential candidate's 
electoral prospects."" Although Mr. Horowitz could not definitively ascertain whether this bias 
""directly affected"" specific FBI actions in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, it nonetheless 
affects the legality of the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry, code-named Crossfire Hurricane. 
Crossfire was launched only months before the 2016 election. Its FBI progenitors—the same ones 
who had investigated Mrs. Clinton—deployed at least one informant to probe Trump campaign 
advisers, obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court wiretap warrants, issued national security 
letters to gather records, and unmasked the identities of campaign officials who were surveilled. They 
also repeatedly leaked investigative information. 
Mr. Horowitz is separately scrutinizing Crossfire and isn't expected to finish for months. But the 
current report reveals that FBI officials displayed not merely an appearance of bias against Donald 
Trump, but animus bordering on hatred. Peter Strzok, who led both the Clinton and Trump 
investigations, confidently assuaged a colleague's fear that Mr. Trump would become president: ""No 
he won't. We'll stop it."" An unnamed FBI lawyer assigned to Crossfire told a colleague he was 
""devastated"" and ""numb"" after Mr. Trump won, while declaring to another FBI attorney: ""Viva le 
resistance."" 
The report highlights the FBI's failure to act promptly upon discovering that Anthony Weiner's laptop 
contained thousands of Mrs. Clinton's emails. Investigators justified the delay by citing the ""higher 
priority"" of Crossfire. But Mr. Horowitz writes: ""We did not have confidence that Strzok's decision to 
prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on [the] investigative lead discovered on the 
Weiner laptop was free from bias."" 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026492 
Similarly, although Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that then-FBI Director James Comey was trying 
to influence the election, Mr. Comey did make decisions based on political considerations. He told the 
inspector general that his election-eve decision to reopen the Clinton email investigation was 
motivated by a desire to protect her assumed presidency's legitimacy. 
The inspector general wrote that Mr. Strzok's text messages ""created the appearance that investigative 
decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations."" The report adds, importantly, that ""most 
of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation."" Given how biases 
ineluctably shape behavior, these facts create a strong inference that by squelching the Clinton 
investigation and building a narrative of Trump-Russia collusion, a group of government officials 
sought to bolster Mrs. Clinton's electoral chances and, if the unthinkable happened, obtain an 
insurance policy to cripple the Trump administration with accusations of illegitimacy. 
What does this have to do with Mr. Mueller, who was appointed in May 2017 after President Trump 
fired Mr. Comey? The inspector general concludes that the pervasive bias ""cast a cloud over the FBI 
investigations to which these employees were assigned,"" including Crossfire. And if Crossfire was 
politically motivated, then its culmination, the appointment of a special counsel, inherited the taint. All 
special-counsel activities—investigations, plea deals, subpoenas, reports, indictments and 
convictions—are fruit of a poisonous tree, byproducts of a violation of due process. That Mr. Mueller 
and his staff had nothing to do with Crossfire's origin offers no cure. 
When the government deprives a person of life, liberty or property, it is required to use fundamentally 
fair processes. The Supreme Court has made clear that when governmental action ""shocks the 
conscience,"" it violates due process. Such conduct includes investigative or prosecutorial efforts that 
appear, under the totality of the circumstances, to be motivated by corruption, bias or entrapment. 
In U.S. v. Russell (1973), the justices observed: ""We may someday be presented with a situation in 
which the conduct of law enforcement agents is so outrageous that due process principles would 
absolutely bar the government from invoking judicial processes to obtain a conviction."" It didn't take 
long. In Blackledge v. Perry (1974), the court concluded that due process was offended by a 
prosecutor's ""realistic likelihood of 'vindictiveness' "" that tainted the ""very initiation of proceedings."" 
In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have ""power to 
employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual. . . we must have assurance 
that those who would wield this power will be guided solely by their sense of public responsibility for 
the attainment of justice."" Prosecutors must be ""disinterested"" and make ""dispassionate assessments,"" 
free from any personal bias. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026493 
In Williams v. Pennsylvania (2016), the court held that a state judge's potential bias violated due 
process because he had played a role, a quarter-century earlier, in prosecuting the death-row inmate 
whose habeas corpus petition he was hearing. The passage of time and involvement of others do not 
vitiate the taint but heighten ""the need for objective rules preventing the operation of bias that might 
otherwise be obscured,"" the justices wrote. A single biased individual ""might still have an influence 
that, while not so visible . . . is nevertheless significant."" 
In addition to the numerous anti-Trump messages uncovered by the inspector general, there is a strong 
circumstantial case—including personnel, timing, methods and the absence of evidence—that 
Crossfire was initiated for political, not national-security, purposes. 
It was initiated in defiance of a longstanding Justice Department presumption against investigating 
campaigns in an election year. And while impartiality is always required, a 2012 memo by then-
Attorney General Eric Holder emphasizes that impartiality is ""particularly important in an election 
year,"" and ""politics must play no role in the decisions of federal prosecutors or investigators regarding 
any investigations. . . . Law enforcement officers and prosecutors may never select the timing of 
investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of 
giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party."" 
Strong evidence of a crime can overcome this policy, as was the case with the bureau's investigation 
of Mrs. Clinton's private email server, which began more than a year before the 2016 election. But 
Crossfire was not a criminal investigation. It was a counterintelligence investigation predicated on the 
notion that Russia could be colluding with the Trump campaign. There appears to have been no 
discernible evidence of Trump-Russia collusion at the time Crossfire was launched, further reinforcing 
the notion that it was initiated ""for the purpose"" of affecting the presidential election. 
The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee's servers. But 
nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative 
therefore hinges on the more generic assertion that Russia aimed to help Mr. Trump's election, and 
that the Trump campaign reciprocated by embracing pro-Russian policies. Yet despite massive 
surveillance and investigation, there's still no public evidence of any such exchange—only that Russia 
attempted to sow political discord by undermining Mrs. Clinton and to a lesser extent Mr. Trump. 
Some members of the Trump team interacted with Russians and advocated dovish policies. But so did 
numerous American political and academic elites, including many Clinton advisers. Presidential 
campaigns routinely seek opposition research and interact with foreign powers. The Clinton campaign 
funded the Steele dossier, whose British author paid Russians to dish anti-Trump dirt. The Podesta 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026494 
Group, led by the brother of Mrs. Clinton's campaign chairman, received millions lobbying for 
Russia's largest baffl( and the European Center for a Modern Ukraine, both with deep Kremlin ties. 
The Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton took millions from Kremlin-connected businesses. 
No evidence has emerged of Trump-Russia collusion, and Mr. Mueller has yet to bring collusion-
related charges against anyone. Evidence suggests one of his targets, George Papadopoulos, was lured 
to London, plied with the prospect of Russian information damaging to Mrs. Clinton, and taken to 
dinner, where he drunkenly bragged that he'd heard about such dirt but never seen it. These 
circumstances not only fail to suggest Mr. Papadopoulos committed a crime, they reek of entrapment. 
The source of this information, former Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, admits Mr. 
Papadopolous never mentioned emails, destroying any reasonable inference of a connection between 
the DNC hack and the Trump campaign. 
Crossfire's progenitors thus ignored an obvious question: If Russia promised unspecified dirt on Mrs. 
Clinton but never delivered it, how would that amount to collusion with the Trump campaign? If 
anything, such behavior suggests an attempt to entice and potentially embarrass Mr. Trump by 
dangling the prospect of compromising information and getting his aides to jump at it. 
Given the paucity of evidence, it's staggering that the FBI would initiate a counterintelligence 
investigation, led by politically biased staff, amid a presidential campaign. The aggressive methods 
and subsequent leaking only strengthen that conclusion. If the FBI sincerely believed Trump 
associates were Russian targets or agents, the proper response would have been to inform Mr. Trump 
so that he could protect his campaign and the country. 
Mr. Trump's critics argue that the claim of political bias is belied by the fact that Crossfire was not 
leaked before the election. In fact, there were vigorous, successful pre-election efforts to publicize the 
Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire's launch, CIA Director John Brennan and 
Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons 
embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington. 
On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times published a letter to Mr. Comey from Senate Minority Leader 
Harry Reid, saying he'd learned of ""evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government 
and Donald Trump's presidential campaign,"" which had ""employed a number of individuals with 
significant and disturbing ties to Russia and the Kremlin."" On Aug. 30, the ranking Democratic 
members of four House committees wrote a public letter to Mr. Comey requesting ""that the FBI assess 
whether connections between Trump campaign officials and Russian interests"" may have contributed 
to the DNC hack so as ""to interfere with the U.S. presidential election."" On Sept. 23, Yahoo News's 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026495 
Michael Isikoff reported the Hill briefings and the Steele dossier's allegations regarding Carter Page. 
On Oct. 30, Harry Reid again publicly wrote Mr. Comey: ""In my communications with you and other 
top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive 
information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the 
Russian government."" 
That these leaking efforts failed to prevent Mr. Trump's victory, or that Mr. Comey's ham-fisted 
interventions might have also hurt Mrs. Clinton's electoral prospects, does not diminish the legal 
significance of the anti-Trump bias shown by government officials. 
The totality of the circumstances creates the appearance that Crossfire was politically motivated. Since 
an attempt by federal law enforcement to influence a presidential election ""shocks the conscience,"" 
any prosecutorial effort derived from such an outrageous abuse of power must be suppressed. The 
public will learn more once the inspector general finishes his investigation into Crossfire's genesis. 
But given what is now known, due process demands, at a minimum, that the special counsel's activity 
be paused. Those affected by Mr. Mueller's investigation could litigate such an argument in court. 
One would hope, however, that given the facts either Mr. Mueller himself or Deputy Attorney General 
Rod Rosenstein would do it first. 
Mr. Rivkin and Ms. Foley practice appellate and constitutional law in Washington. He served at the 
Justice Department and the White House Counsel's Office during the Reagan and George H.W. Bush 
administrations. She is a professor at Florida International University College of Law. 
Appeared in the June 23, 2018, print edition. 
Best, 
Andrew 
Andrew Grossman 
Partner 
<image001.png> 
Washington Square 
1050 Connecticut Ave, N.W. I Suite 1100 
Washington, DC 20036-5304 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026496 
bakerlaw.com 
<image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> 
From: ""Rivkin, David"" < 
Date: Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM 
To: ""Grossman, Andrew M"" ________________________ 
Subject: <no subject> 
Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx 
Sent from my iPhone 
This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended 
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying 
or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately 
by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content 
of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein 
and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a 
complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities. 
Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of 
inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, 
we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are 
present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result 
of e-mail transmission. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026497 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026498 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029723.txt,"West, but we actually know little or
nothing about what Iranian decision-
makers think about nuclear weapons or
deterrence theory. Since the Iranian
revolution in 1979, opportunities for the
exchange of professional views between
Western and Iranian scholars,
policymakers, and military leaders on
these critically important issues have
been extremely limited. Therefore, it's not
unreasonable to assume that the Iranians,
like American policymakers in the early
stages of developing their nuclear triad
doctrine, will think of nuclear weapons as
merely ""big artillery."" Unfortunately, the
United States and its security partners
lack formal and informal exchanges with
the Iranians akin to the Cold War
discussions and arms control negotiations
between the Americans and Soviets,
which allowed both parties to develop
mutual understandings of the other's
perception of nuclear weapons. These
understandings were essential for crisis
management in the Cold War strategic
relationship after the Cuban missile
crisis.

Meanwhile, the Gulf states, led by Saudi
Arabia, are likely to look for their own
nuclear deterrents. Much like France
wanted its own nuclear force de frappe
during the Cold War, the Gulf states will
want their own nuclear weapons to deter
Iran. Saudi Arabia and the smaller Gulf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029723
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010574.txt,"15. One of Mr. Epstein’s household employees, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, saw
numerous underage girls coming into Epstein’s mansion for purported “massages.” See
Rodriguez Depo. at 242-44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodriguez was aware that “sex toys”
and vibrators were found in Epstein’s bedroom after the purported massages. Jd. at 223-28.
Rodriguez thought what Epstein was doing was wrong, given the extreme youth of the girls he
saw. Id. at 230-31..

16. Alfredo Rodriguez took a journal from Epstein’s computer that reflected many of
the names of underage females Epstein abused across the country and the world, including
locations such as Michigan, California, West Palm Beach, New York, New Mexico, and Paris,
France. See Journal (hereinafter “The Journal” or “Holy Grail”) (Exhibit “F”) (identifying,
among other Epstein acquaintances, females that Rodriguez believes were underage under the
heading labeled ""Massages"").

17. Rodriguez was later charged in a criminal complaint with obstruction of justice in
connection with trying to obtain $50,000 from civil attorneys pursuing civil sexual assault cases
against Epstein as payment for producing the book to the attorneys. See Criminal Complaint at
2, U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 9:10-CR-80015-KAM (S.D. Fla. 2010) (Exhibit “G”). Rodriguez
stated he needed money because the journal was his “property” and that he was aftaid that
Jeffrey Epstein would make him “disappear” unless he had an “insurance policy” (i.e., the
journal). Jd. at 3. Because of the importance of the information in the journal to the civil cases,
Mr. Rodriguez called it “The Holy Grail.”

| 18. In the “Holy Grail” or “The Journal,” among the many names listed (along with

the abused girls) aré some of the people that Epstein alleges in his Complaint had “no connection
9

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010574
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016552.txt,"﻿Royal-Southern
PCN OWNERNAME1 OWNERNAME2 STREETNAME BLK SITEADDR PADDR1 PADDR2 PADDR3 TOTTAXVAL ACRES PROPUSE CAMA-RESBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-RESBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF BEDROOMS NUMBER OF FULL BATHROOMS NUMBER OF HALF BATHROOMS STORY HEIGHT CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING AREA TOTAL AREA SQUARE FOOT LIVING AREA CAMA-COMBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-COMBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF UNITS STORIES CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE DESC CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING AREA COMPLEX ID COMPLEX NAME UNIT NUMBER CLASSIFICATION CODE CLASSIFICATION DESC CAMA-CONDO.YEAR BUILT AREA VALUE 
50434322170000010 STEINDL ETHEL J        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000020 5 E SOUTHLAKE TRUST ANN P FITZGERALD TR       131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000030 FITZGERALD ANN P TR & FITZGERALD W KEVIN TR       131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000040 GARDNER CLAIRE B TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000050 GARDNER CLAIRE B TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000060 BLACK SUSANNE TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000070 DUPONT LEA        828,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1283100 
50434322170000080 HIGGINBOTHAM RICHARD A & HIGGINBOTHAM CAROLE M       1,273,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1271550 
50434322170000090 HIGGINBOTHAM RICHARD A &        895,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1969   1283     895650 
50434322170000100 HODNETT LESLIE Z TR        1,294,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1293100 
50434322170000110 LONG GORDON G LONG GORDON G TR       802,039.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1281550 
50434322170000120 NATORI KENNETH R &        1,281,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1281550 
50434322170000130 MACKINTOSH ELISABETH P ELISABETH PLANKINTON MACKINTOSH REV TRUS       760,342.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1331400 
50434322170000140 FREASE BELDEN A & FREASE DOLINA R       721,961.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1013250 
50434322170000150 WEISER EVELYN        250,624.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1293100 
50434322170000160 PLIMPTON HOLLIS W & PLIMPTON PEGGY L       1,304,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1303100 
50434322170000170 SENGE JURGEN & SENGE GABRIELE       1,293,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1291550 
50434322170000180 BLACK SUSANNE BLACK SUSANNE TR       287,225.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1291550 
50434322170000190 OLSHAN MARVIN L & OLSHAN ROSE       1,341,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1341400 
50434322170000200 SMITH ROBERT B        237,293.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1023250 
50434322170000210 HARTMAN CHARLOTTE B & BRYANT MARK       257,228.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1303100 
50434322170000220 EQUITABLE HOLDING CORP WILLIAM P VANNECK C/O       1,314,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1313100 
50434322170000230 MOORE WILLIAM H III & DOROTHY        1,301,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1301550 
50434322170000240 SOUTHLAKE ENTERPRISES CORP L S CHURCHILL C/O       1,301,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1301550 
50434322170000250 STEINDL ETHEL J        1,351,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1351400 
50434322170000260 FITZGERALD W KEVIN        1,034,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1033250 
50434322170000270 WATERMAN RICHARD        260,529.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1313100 
50434322170000290 MIRANDO FELIX A JR        250,133.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1311550 
50434322170000300 BROWNE H LEE & BROWNE JACQUELYN G       879,191.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1311550 
50434322170000310 CLUETT JEAN DANIELS CLUETT JEAN DANIELS TR       1,067,804.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1361400 
50434322170000320 5 E SOUTHLAKE TRUST ANN P FITZGERALD TR       1,044,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1043250 
50434322170000330 EADES VIRGINIA T        262,488.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1323100 
50434322170000340 LARKIN OWEN G        2,664,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0340 0400 CONDO 1969   4521    2662800 
50434322170000350 GARDNER CLARA B        507,462.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0350 0400 CONDO 1969   2705    1592850 
50434322170000360 ROBBINS SUSAN W ROBBINS RICHARD L       1,273,393.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0360 0400 CONDO 1969   2705    1592850 
50434322170000370 BENZ DOMINIQUE V        1,298,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0370 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1298850 
50434322170000380 COFFIN MARTHA        469,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1969    776     469350 
50434322260001010 PRICE AILENE W        141,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260001020 DONNELLEY RICHARD R III & DONNELLEY ROBIN W       275,218.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260002010 HORNER ROBERT R JR        519,590.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260002020 KAUFMANN ELLEN F        551,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434323050010040 ROSALIND LLC        2,311,796.00 0 MULTIFAMILY           1927 1990 0014 01 2 FIRE RESIS     350220       6336         
50434323050010061 BALLANTINE JOHN W &        2,586,102.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1144977       3719       3892       3368                 
50434323050010062 KELLY ARTHUR L & KELLY DIANE R       2,194,287.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 01 2     983402       3193       3367       2786                 
50434323050010063 BARTHOLOMAY WILLIAM C C/O WILLIS OF ILLINOIS       1,915,341.00 0.08 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 00 2     713256       2317       2449       2008                 
50434323050010064 SCHNEIDER IRA &        2,002,127.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1116965       3627       3800       3276                 
50434323050010065 BRAZILIAN ASSOC #2 LTD HOLLY ADLER C/O       0.00 0.28 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434323050010122 BRAZILIAN ASSOC II LTD HOLLY ADLER C/O       57.00 0.19 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434323050010123 ABELL HELEN H        1,067,681.00 0.1 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1144977       3719       3892       3368                 
50434323050010124 TOWNSEND PENELOPE D        2,116,047.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 01 1     983402       3193       3367       2786                 
50434323050010125 SWEET PHILLIP W JR & SWEET NANCY       1,480,826.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 00 2     713256       2317       2449       2008                 
50434323050010126 DAY JOSEPH C & JOSEPH & DIANA DAY ET AL TR HLDRS       1,757,630.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1121767       3643       3816       3292                 
50434323050010190 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        618,998.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 1      51475       1770       1770       1770                 
50434323050010190 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        618,998.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 2     127535       2778       3203       2694                 
50434323050010221 WOLFE RICHARD W        3,966,355.00 0.1799 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 07 01 2.5    2454198       6081       6600       5522                 
50434323050010222 WOLFE RICHARD W & WOLFE CAROL M       1,375,231.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1970 04 04 00 2     140226       2528       2632       2466                 
50434323050010223 WHALOU PROPERTIES II LLC        862,392.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050010241 GOULD GEORGE D &        3,564,072.00 0.1788 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 07 01 2.5    1941108       5611       5839       5236                 
50434323050020011 ALLISON J RICHARD & ALLISON ANNETTE D       1,588,044.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1953 1985 04 04 00 2     323080       5104       5560       4503                 
50434323050020050 WATKINS CHRISTINE        2,205,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1910 2000 05 05 00 2     284235       3336       3560       3240                 
50434323050020050 WATKINS CHRISTINE        2,205,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1      92636        798        798        798                 
50434323050020070 WELFELD MIMI A        411,241.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1980 00 03 00 1     180760       2176       2176       2176                 
50434323050020090 FRIESE FAMILY TRUST FRIESE PAUL TRUSTEE       552,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1960 00 01 00 2      68973        800        800        800                 
50434323050020090 FRIESE FAMILY TRUST FRIESE PAUL TRUSTEE       552,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 00 03 00 2     166222       1907       1954       1882                 
50434323050020110 SHEHADI EVELYN SHEHADI ELIZABETH       1,485,265.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 02 00 2      78030       1195       1296        960                 
50434323050020110 SHEHADI EVELYN SHEHADI ELIZABETH       1,485,265.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 03 00 2     160046       2064       2267       1960                 
50434323050020130 SHIVERICK PAUL &        3,322,419.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1474385       5192       5697       4772                 
50434323050020150 BIDWELL BENNETT E & BIDWELL PAULA N       3,265,980.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 04 01 1    1415772       4951       5412       4407                 
50434323050020170 YELVINGTON GARY REV TRUST OF 1997 YELVINGTON GARY TR       3,675,936.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 2    1837281       5354       5528       4984                 
50434323050020190 GAGE JOHN Z & GAGE KAREN S       2,130,353.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1918 1980 00 03 00 2     299078       2432       2764       2290                 
50434323050020210 DEZIEL ROBERT E        1,512,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1985 00 03 01 2     420336       4376       4536       4342                 
50434323050020231 HEYDON PETER N & HENRIETTA M        1,552,800.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 03 01 2      29552       2881       3003       2617                 
50434323050020232 SHAFFER MARGARET S        864,921.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1990 00 03 00 2     585083       3318       3384       3164                 
50434323050020261 STUART GLORIA G        1,675,677.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 03 00 1      29546       2729       2928       2438                 
50434323050030011 KASSATLY EDWARD M & ROBERT F KASSATLY       1,272,644.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 03 00 2      13927       2731       2944       2560                 
50434323050030011 KASSATLY EDWARD M & ROBERT F KASSATLY       1,272,644.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1960 00 01 00 1      72337       1024       1024       1024                 
50434323050030012 337 339 COCOANUT ROW LLC        1,388,931.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      30321        514        514        514                 
50434323050030012 337 339 COCOANUT ROW LLC        1,388,931.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1955 00 03 01 2     171457       3132       3156       3102                 
50434323050030013 TRANSAMERICAN PROPERTIES INC        1,106,842.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1928 1950 0006 01 1 WOOD FRAME      11590       4976         
50434323050030030 GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E & JEFFRY GIANGRANDE TR TITL HLDR       3,571,934.00 0.188 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 01 2    1789416       4506       4832       4078                 
50434323050030130 BASS JACK M JR & BASS MELINDA       3,555,435.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1794081       5027       5387       4614                 
50434323050030150 HOLLIS EARL A JR TR        3,682,821.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1922455       5391       5897       4940                 
50434323050030171 THREE 24 BRAZILIAN AVE INC MIGUEL GUZMAN C/O       1,429,298.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1995 04 03 00 2     373871       2321       2589       2214                 
50434323050030410 ANTHONY RUTH D TR SUN TRUST BANK TRUSTEE C/O       3,533,471.00 0.1719 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2032706       4246       4726       3835                 
50434323050030421 MENDLER HENRY & LAWTON SUZANNE       3,259,490.00 0.1379 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2145389       4485       4956       4050                 
50434323050030441 RUSSO JOSEPH L & RUSSO CAROL B       3,340,036.00 0.1722 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2014290       4208       4686       3795                 
50434323050040011 DEAN MARGARET M        3,230,146.00 0.1872 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 3    2929118       4958       5996       4421                 
50434323050040012 KINNEAR FINANCIAL CONSULTING LTD PENGROWTH MGMT LTD C/O       3,844,294.00 0.1765 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 05 01 3    2413965       5729       6744       5231                 
50434323050040040 455 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE CORP        57.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050040090 449 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE LLC        1,518,688.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1948 1958 06 06 00 1      98688       2325       2401       2305                 
50434323050040110 STEWARD GRACE VANNER        1,428,641.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1965 00 01 00 1       7749       1229       1305       1053                 
50434323050040230 AULT MICHAEL VAN C & VAN CLIEF FAITH       1,281,104.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1940 00 01 00 1       4367        851        880        880                 
50434323050040230 AULT MICHAEL VAN C & VAN CLIEF FAITH       1,281,104.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1944 00 01 00 1       6492       1477       1607       1468                 
50434323050040283 YUNGHANNS PATRICIA        924,168.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1975 00 02 00 2     209451       3085       3238       2932                 
50434323050040360 KEITEL FREDERICK J III        1,608,438.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 03 02 00 1     154483       2033       2033       2033                 
50434323050040380 BARKER JAMES H & DOUGLAS KENNETH W JR       2,047,210.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 00 2     316979       5049       5598       4043                 
50434323050040410 OKAIN DEBORAH L        1,853,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 00 04 00 2     398662       4168       4579       3853                 
50434323050040430 CHRISTMAN PAUL R &        2,559,435.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1980 02 02 00 2      88418       1035       1294        970                 
50434323050040430 CHRISTMAN PAUL R &        2,559,435.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1990 03 03 01 2     735527       2776       3184       2408                 
50434323050040450 BRAZILIAN AVENUE LLC C/O STEVE DATTELS       3,153,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    1391673       4093       4608       3586                 
50434323050040470 RODDY CHARLES T        832,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1948 00 03 01 2      11686       3617       3850       3229                 
50434323050040510 BRANSTROM WILLIAM J III & BRANSTROM ROBIN R       1,770,805.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 00 2      28527       2505       2554       2484                 
50434323050040530 TARA HAMPTON INC        3,941,584.00 0.19 MFR <10 UNITS 1999 1999 03 04 01 2    2180137       4710       5534       4055                 
50434323050040541 TELESE NANCY E        2,392,112.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1914671       4850       5676       4194                 
50434323050050060 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050050100 SMITH MATTHEW K & SMITH TRACY E       3,958,192.00 0.2296 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 01 2    1992244       5003       5250       4525                 
50434323050050131 SALTZMAN IRVIN & SALTZMAN BARBARA R       2,511,418.00 0.165 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 05 01 2    1566946       4361       4683       3974                 
50434323050050151 FOWLER MARK S FOWLER MARK S TR       2,413,354.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 03 01 2    1643347       4574       4848       4199                 
50434323050050261 360 COCOANUT ROW LLC        3,190,540.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2005 03 05 01 1    1883610       4556       4813       4196                 
50434323050050262 WINTER RICHARD & WINTER BELLA       2,838,224.00 0.2 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1983296       5113       5496       4712                 
50434323050050350 PORTER HERBERT R JR & PORTER ALINA M       2,737,108.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 06 01 2    1485356       5665       6116       5296                 
50434323050050380 MORTARA VIRGINIA        2,359,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 00 03 01 2     426680       3553       3692       3419                 
50434323050050380 MORTARA VIRGINIA        2,359,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1949 00 02 00 2     130388       2195       2268       2100                 
50434323050050410 EDENS ROBERT L III EDENS ROBERT LUTHER III TR       1,609,586.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 03 02 01 1     283783       1779       1796       1772                 
50434323050050430 GOODERHAM EDWARD D TR ET AL        1,453,653.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1948 00 02 00 2     116733       2109       2216       1986                 
50434323050050450 430 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE LLC        3,081,971.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1971 1971 0005 01 2 FIRE RESIS     445400       7548         
50434323050050490 CASTILFORTI LLC        1,583,181.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1951 1990 00 04 00 2     264693       3167       3321       3066                 
50434323050050510 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050050540 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050060010 T H COURT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        4,698,515.00 0.43 MOTEL           1918 1985 0055 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2212140      32758         
50434323050060070 LOCKS MARK        1,325,705.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 00 00 2     357517       3083       3292       2744                 
50434323050060090 HAYMES ANNE MARIE        1,633,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 00 00 2     358296       3089       3292       2753                 
50434323050060110 BUCKLAND PETER & FIRST NATIONAL PAYMENT SVCS C/O       1,560,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 1     234202       1948       2060       1900                 
50434323050060130 FRANKEL FRANK        1,412,341.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 2      65983        765        861        826                 
50434323050060130 FRANKEL FRANK        1,412,341.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 03 00 2     239427       2631       2760       2594                 
50434323050060150 SLOMOWITZ MARVIN & SLOMOWITZ ISOBEL       5,362,117.00 0.4104 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 01 2    1784596       6269       6977       5667                 
50434323050060181 SADLER SHANNON G        280,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1949 00 01 00 1      39216        512        512        512                 
50434323050060181 SADLER SHANNON G        280,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 02 00 1     144342       1448       1475       1451                 
50434323050060201 PUCILLO BIAGINA        281,592.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1949 00 01 00 1      37414        523        552        516                 
50434323050060201 PUCILLO BIAGINA        281,592.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1955 00 02 00 1     145262       1416       1472       1407                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 00 02 00 1      97965       1279       1362       1248                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1941 00 01 00 2      84602       1628       1700       1460                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 00 01 00 1      29504        459        459        459                 
50434323050060251 CIOC ERICA & IOANA CIOC & DOINA CIOC-BENAC       1,166,319.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1956 1970 00 03 01 1     132248       2259       2293       2245                 
50434323050060252 CSC BRAZILIAN LP CEEBRAID SIGNAL CORP C/O       1,584,354.00 0.16 OFFICE 1 STORY           1930 2007 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     579800       4671         
50434323050060320 DOUBLE L FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LAURA ANTHONY JOHNSTON C/O       1,352,293.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1956 1956 04 04 00 2      32430       2771       3116       2600                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1936 00 01 00 1       4517        264        264        264                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1940 00 01 00 1       8234        470        483        467                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 1      22339       1557       1872       1428                 
50434323050060360 PRESSLY JAMES G JR & PRESSLY KATHRYN       1,468,521.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1970 00 02 00 1     132629       1571       1911       1293                 
50434323050060380 HAFT ALLISON R HAFT STUART J       1,676,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 02 00 2      73926       1212       1212       1212                 
50434323050060380 HAFT ALLISON R HAFT STUART J       1,676,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 00 2     281149       2490       2870       2380                 
50434323050060420 KANE DAVID P        363,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1955 04 03 00 2     161035       2803       2952       2760                 
50434323050060420 KANE DAVID P        363,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1941 00 02 00 2      37178        637        909          1                 
50434323050060450 SCULLY JOHN S        4,878,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2001 05 06 01 2    3081355       7692       8474       7364                 
50434323050060490 GOLDENBERG MARVIN MARVIN GOLDENBERG TR TITL HLDR       1,488,483.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1167948       3941       4481       3422                 
50434323050060510 KENT JORIE B KENT JORIE B TR       2,356,896.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1200372       4361       4883       3698                 
50434323050060530 REED GENE        2,438,438.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1094998       3797       4108       3255                 
50434323050060541 CAIN BARBARA A        1,732,281.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1122690       3787       4063       3255                 
50434323050070011 GROBE-SNYDER LOUISE        2,072,869.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 00 00 2     899145       3735       3943       3382                 
50434323050070012 HOVSEPIAN SUREN        917,417.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 00 00 2     899385       3736       3944       3383                 
50434323050070030 SULLIVAN JOHN A & SULLIVAN SHARLA J       1,220,686.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 01 01 00 1      58152        572        760        468                 
50434323050070030 SULLIVAN JOHN A & SULLIVAN SHARLA J       1,220,686.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 00 02 00 2     299163       2780       2900       2729                 
50434323050070050 HERON JEAN ELLEN HERON JEAN ELLEN TR       1,413,895.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 03 00 2      77393       1598       1640       1640                 
50434323050070050 HERON JEAN ELLEN HERON JEAN ELLEN TR       1,413,895.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1960 05 04 00 2     169065       2641       2790       2582                 
50434323050070060 KARAYIANNAKIS ANNA K        1,041,862.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1960 1960 0005 01 2 FIRE RESIS     160950       3993         
50434323050070070 PIERCE POONSRI POONSRI PIERCE TR TITL HLDR       649,562.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1940 04 04 00 2      52784       2497       2599       2471                 
50434323050070070 PIERCE POONSRI POONSRI PIERCE TR TITL HLDR       649,562.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1957 1960 00 03 00 2      22596       1143       1199       1033                 
50434323050070080 ANDRE LAURA        1,508,810.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1962 1962 00 03 01 2     237758       3524       3694       3378                 
50434323050070090 JAMGOCHIAN GEORGE M & JAMGOCHIAN DEBORAH S       1,325,371.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1949 1955 00 04 00 2       7171       2664       2888       2500                 
50434323050070100 WAHLESTEDT LISA T & WAHLESTEDT CLAES       1,091,100.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 02 00 2     240279       3069       3314       2964                 
50434323050070110 THREE 50 REALTY CORP LOVE REALTY GEDNEY STATION C/O       6,000,000.00 0.7232 STORE/OFF/RES           1952 1995 0013 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2494400      26569         
50434323050070181 FORTIN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC        1,606,076.00 0.1386 STORES           1962 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     153680       1729         
50434323050070182 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.1036 FOREST/PK/REC                           
50434323050070231 MWB FAMILY TRUST OCONNELL TARA TR &       4,663,505.00 0.2419 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    2590451       6173       6427       5776                 
50434323050070270 MAY MICHAEL J        1,909,718.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 04 01 2    1536228       3949       4256       3585                 
50434323050070290 229 CHILEAN AVENUE LLC        2,834,118.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 05 00 2    1469552       3811       4220       3384                 
50434323050070310 REED GORDON P & MARY G MARY G GORDON       401,128.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 03 00 1     155478       2174       2230       2122                 
50434323050070330 STEPHAN MCGLONE MARYLYNNE &        2,406,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 04 03 02 2    1075295       4178       4330       3968                 
50434323050070350 CLAGGETT BARBARA C BARBARA C CLAGGETT TR TITL HLDR       757,474.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 04 03 02 2    1075295       4178       4330       3968                 
50434323050070371 CANTOR MABEL 2008 REV TRUST        1,222,855.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 00 02 00 1     214881       1506       1589       1511                 
50434323050070372 HOBERG FREDERICK W        1,684,468.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1965 00 03 00 1     217876       2596       2846       2272                 
50434323050080010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.4 MUNICIPAL           2004 2004 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      58030        792         
50434323050080010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.4 MUNICIPAL           2004 2004 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2912060      22775         
50434323050080050 SALEEBY SHIRLEY        1,001,150.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1917 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     157400       3080         
50434323050080060 CBRS REALTY LTD        1,718,631.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1948 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     371430       8400         
50434323050080080 PBI LLC        2,952,909.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1990 0004 01 1 WOOD FRAME     952250      12035         
50434323050080110 GILBERTSON E NORDIN & GILBERTSON B CHARLOTTE       402,395.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1918 1929 00 03 00 2       7025       2926       3321       2673                 
50434323050080110 GILBERTSON E NORDIN & GILBERTSON B CHARLOTTE       402,395.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1918 1936 00 01 00 1       1342        520        520        520                 
50434323050080150 AMORE J TRUST        2,617,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 00 02 00 1     169851       2548       2829       2208                 
50434323050080150 AMORE J TRUST        2,617,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 00 01 00 2       3748       2230       2706       2097                 
50434323050080180 OHANNESSIAN ANTOINE        1,968,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1937 00 03 00 1      79357       2074       2193       1800                 
50434323050080180 OHANNESSIAN ANTOINE        1,968,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1950 00 03 01 2     232402       3243       3278       3228                 
50434323050080210 CHANT CORP        1,759,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1911 1970 00 03 00 2      12413       2808       2882       2387                 
50434323050080210 CHANT CORP        1,759,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1915 1950 00 02 00 1       4283        945       1098        666                 
50434323050080241 ALNA LLC        1,418,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1950 00 01 00 1      22752        432        432        432                 
50434323050080241 ALNA LLC        1,418,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1970 00 02 00 1     119718       1605       1616       1600                 
50434323050080270 LOWDEN ROBERT D & BEVERLY C LOWDEN BEVERLY C       386,554.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1909 1985 00 03 00 2     219095       2291       2650       1972                 
50434323050080291 COLLINS JAMES L & COLLINS SUSAN S       824,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1985 00 02 00 1      93490       2141       2176       2176                 
50434323050080311 SHUBERT NANCY E        1,353,739.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 00 02 00 1     233515       1550       1834       1238                 
50434323050080430 SULLIVAN A MICHAEL JR        529,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1955 00 01 00 2      78082        942       1177        589                 
50434323050080430 SULLIVAN A MICHAEL JR        529,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1970 00 04 00 2     283045       2812       3157       2684                 
50434323050080440 ZOSLOW SYLVIA L ZOSLOW SYLVIA L TR       355,382.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      47125        630        798        399                 
50434323050080440 ZOSLOW SYLVIA L ZOSLOW SYLVIA L TR       355,382.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     180780       2407       2442       2392                 
50434323050080450 OSMENA MARIA VICTORIA R TR TEMPLETON & COMPANY LLP C/O       2,243,644.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1970 00 02 00 1      10799       1871       2060       1518                 
50434323050080470 DIXON FRANCIGENE S YOUNG SHERIDAN TR       1,086,913.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1975 00 03 00 1     410939       4135       4361       3735                 
50434323050080490 FLYNN MICHAEL J & FLYNN ANNE J       1,704,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 04 04 01 3     504420       4644       4837       4569                 
50434323050080490 FLYNN MICHAEL J & FLYNN ANNE J       1,704,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 01 00 2      61800        709        849        400                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1910 1950 03 01 00 1       6282        871        930        846                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1937 02 01 00 1       3794        627        627        627                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 05 04 00 2      16904       3558       3558       3558                 
50434323050090010 THREE SEVENTY FIVE SOUTH COUNTY ASSOC/GEDNEY STATION       5,000,000.00 0.5539 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     555410       5421         
50434323050090010 THREE SEVENTY FIVE SOUTH COUNTY ASSOC/GEDNEY STATION       5,000,000.00 0.5539 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1744690      11271         
50434323050090090 SPEYER ALEXANDER C JR        1,303,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 2     136619       1856       1862       1842                 
50434323050090090 SPEYER ALEXANDER C JR        1,303,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1964 00 02 00 1      49959        666        666        666                 
50434323050090110 PAOLOZZI THOMAS F &        1,542,405.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1960 00 02 00 1     149275       1836       1982       1823                 
50434323050090130 BROWNSTONE HOLDINGS GROUP GOLDFINGER & LASSAR C/O       1,463,574.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 03 00 2     341677       3569       3705       3620                 
50434323050090150 TONELLI JOHN        1,589,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1933 00 02 00 2      84585       1978       2027       1904                 
50434323050090150 TONELLI JOHN        1,589,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 00 2     184886       2359       2523       2313                 
50434323050090171 FARAWAY SHORES LTD        2,014,138.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1988 04 03 00 1     231954       2568       2637       2577                 
50434323050090201 FAIRBANKS DANIEL J        1,336,533.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1985 00 03 01 2     273729       3500       3624       3450                 
50434323050090230 RITTERBUSH STEPHEN W & RITTERBUSH KAREN J &       1,852,782.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1912 1980 00 03 00 2     643637       3007       3206       2946                 
50434323050090230 RITTERBUSH STEPHEN W & RITTERBUSH KAREN J &       1,852,782.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1975 00 02 00 2      84420       1077       1095       1050                 
50434323050090250 ROWAN LISA        2,872,204.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 2      69410        816        960        480                 
50434323050090250 ROWAN LISA        2,872,204.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1993 04 04 01 2     557697       4844       5002       4582                 
50434323050090290 NASSER JOSEPH A        424,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1945 00 01 00 2      55686        823        968        484                 
50434323050090290 NASSER JOSEPH A        424,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 04 03 00 2     219256       2681       2781       2720                 
50434323050090310 DICKSON DORIS R        395,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1945 02 01 00 2      55686        823        968        484                 
50434323050090310 DICKSON DORIS R        395,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 04 03 00 2     216440       2541       2607       2573                 
50434323050090480 GRANT RICHARD H JR & C/O ROBINSON REALTY & PROP MGMT       3,598,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 05 00 2    1357909       7526       8442       6318                 
50434323050090580 HIGHLANDS MOBILE HOME PARK & SALES INC        1,097,415.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1992 00 02 00 2      86947       1240       1377       1068                 
50434323050090580 HIGHLANDS MOBILE HOME PARK & SALES INC        1,097,415.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1992 00 02 00 2     168848       1261       1261       1261                 
50434323050090600 ALBAN CO        1,153,801.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1980 02 02 00 1     145680       1917       2035       1672                 
50434323050100010 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        2,345,810.00 0.72 PKG LT / MH PK                           
50434323050100070 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        1,186,380.00 0.14 VACANT                           
50434323050100090 GILBERT HENRY A III        888,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1936 00 01 00 1      51138        868       1024        528                 
50434323050100090 GILBERT HENRY A III        888,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 02 00 2     181812       2583       2853       2432                 
50434323050100110 CELEDINAS RAY S & CELEDINAS KIM R       1,836,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      23648        748        966        420                 
50434323050100110 CELEDINAS RAY S & CELEDINAS KIM R       1,836,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 03 00 2      96169       2547       2552       2552                 
50434323050100180 HOLLIS EARL A INC        1,187,375.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050100240 CHURCH OF BETHESDA BY THE SEA        0.00 0 STORES           1935 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     376790       4710         
50434323050100280 RHINO REAL ESTATE INC        4,242,109.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1983 2007 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1732590       5998         
50434323050100320 RISOTTO REALTY        1,443,070.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1953 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     193070       2601         
50434323050100340 RISOTTO REALTY        1,761,275.00 0 RESTAURANT           1935 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     510490       4280         
50434323050100360 HOLLIS EARL A INC        1,593,333.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1950 1970 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     343150       5284         
50434323050100380 BROBERG GUSTAVE T JR & BROBERG STEWART C       1,928,520.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1986 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     678520       4341         
50434323050100400 RINKER RUBY S REV LIVING TRUST RINKER RUBY S TRUSTEE       1,875,867.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1962 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     624550       5536         
50434323050100420 KAHN EDWARD & KAHN ADELE       765,737.00 0 STORES           1928 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      46120       1931         
50434323050100440 KAHN EDWARD & KAHN ADELE       2,611,673.00 0 STORES           1950 1970 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     110010       3379         
50434323050110110 334 CHILIAN LLC        2,102,723.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1979 00 07 00 2     273275       4116       4582       3737                 
50434323050110200 DEVENOW MAUDETTE H MAUDETTE H DEVENOW TR TITL HLDR       2,158,474.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1272725       4512       4812       4195                 
50434323050110221 HOLTZMAN SEYMOUR &        2,676,377.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 2    1775629       4491       4927       4146                 
50434323050110250 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.57 CULTURAL           1994 1994 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      16890        346         
50434323050110250 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.57 CULTURAL           1994 1994 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      26910        304         
50434323050110330 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0 CULTURAL           2004 2004 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1563780       6260         
50434323050110360 MADDOCK PAUL L JR & BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRS       3,607,476.00 0 PROF OFFICES           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1731070       6474         
50434323050110390 CINQUE PARTNERS LTD        784,894.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1949 00 03 00 2     132962       2596       2613       2613                 
50434323050110410 L G LIMA LLC        3,776,047.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     256680       4365         
50434323050110460 341 PERUVIAN LLC        3,320,651.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1990 00 03 00 2     454693       2519       2563       2500                 
50434323050110460 341 PERUVIAN LLC        3,320,651.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1967 1990 00 03 01 1     948904       5483       6307       4476                 
50434323050110530 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        4,473,249.00 0 STORES           1950 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     346900       2058         
50434323050110530 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        4,473,249.00 0 STORES           1958 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     686460       4868         
50434323050120190 BEARD ANSON M JR & BEARD DEBRA W       1,643,717.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1950 04 02 00 2     519439       3873       4541       2873                 
50434323050120211 WIENERT KATHERINE B        464,434.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     499779       1390       1390       1390                 
50434323050120212 BERNHARD WILLIAM L & CAHILL CATHERINE       1,045,233.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     497257       1383       1442       1358                 
50434323050120213 CATHEDRAL ESTATES LTD MS. KIM MORGAN CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN       1,063,274.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     515714       1546       1546       1546                 
50434323050120231 STEELE T GARRICK        1,042,356.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     494241       1422       1422       1422                 
50434323050120232 FINDLAY KATHERINE D        929,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     380145        927        927        927                 
50434323050120233 BLAIR BOWEN W BLAIR CO C/O       1,176,052.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     626192       1966       2002       1942                 
50434323050120251 SANDERSON FREDA L        131,820.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120252 BERNHARD WILLIAM L & CAHILL CATHERINE &       131,820.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120253 FINDLAY KATHERINE D        91,260.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120254 OHERRON EDWARD M JR TR &        91,260.00 0.02 VACANT                           
50434323050120255 BOLDIN WIENERT KATJA        50,700.00 0.01 VACANT                           
50434323050120256 BLAIR BOWEN W BLAIR CO C/O       0.00 0.01 VACANT                           
50434323050120340 DEBENEDICTIS DANIELLE E        1,953,695.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1995 00 03 01 2    1204624       4200       4200       4200                 
50434323050120360 BEARD NANCY N & BEARD JOHN L       5,082,287.00 0.36 MFR <10 UNITS 1999 1999 03 03 01 2    2150747       6128       8440       5056                 
50434323050120410 DOUBLE L FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LAURA ANTHONY JOHNSTON C/O       1,348,556.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1953 00 03 01 2      29925       2907       3277       2704                 
50434323050120430 VANDERGRIFT JAMES B VANDERGRIFT JAMES B TR       1,542,072.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 02 00 2      10519       2396       2500       2352                 
50434323050120520 MURPHY GARY L TR        1,552,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 00 04 00 2     233154       2847       2990       2636                 
50434323050120540 NASSAU SQ CO OP APTS INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050130100 FRISBIE DAVID W DAVID W FRISBIE TR TITL HLDR       2,461,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1925 1975 0009 01 1 WOOD FRAME     157180       3932         
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1925 1975 0077 01 1 WOOD FRAME     968140      25827         
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1962 1975 0045 01 2 FIRE RESIS     717010      16902         
50434323050140030 DUNCAN MIMI G MIMI DUNCAN TR TITL HLDR       737,375.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     515890       1584         
50434323050140030 DUNCAN MIMI G MIMI DUNCAN TR TITL HLDR       737,375.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1139660       8357         
50434323050140130 LOVE III LLC        2,508,151.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES                           
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1958 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      68070       1046         
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1958 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     234230       2524         
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1972 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      89270       1067         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     265880       2017         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     832310       7163         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1182780       7358         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1988 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     180090       1190         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1999 1999 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     282920       1794         
50434323050140241 LOVE II LLC GEDNEY STATION       2,682,710.00 0 STORES           1952 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     611350       6742         
50434323050140242 CHANEL INC DIRECTOR OF TAX DEPT C/O       10,627,792.00 0.4 STORES           1929 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3222580      22047         
50434323050140331 LOVE LLC        6,000,000.00 0.2583 STORES           1929 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     605360       7779         
50434323050140391 NEW PALM        4,074,944.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1929 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1199590       8443         
50434323050140430 WORTH AVENUE HOLDINGS LLC        2,736,730.00 0 STORES           1925 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     724230       2559         
50434323050140510 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        7,300,000.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     370410       7780         
50434323050140510 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        7,300,000.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     975990      20526         
50434323050150010 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        5,424,130.00 1.38 PKG LT / MH PK                           
50434323050150200 LOVE LLC GEDNEY STATION       1,283,286.00 0 WAREH/DIST TERM           1956 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      30800       1050         
50434323050150220 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050150280 LENDAN INC        11,674,980.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1958 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2956230      35525         
50434323050150340 LOVE LLC GEDNEY STATION       6,752,900.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1929 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1126700      12886         
50434323050150380 PA FL ASSOC HOWE & ADDINGTON C/O       7,834,870.00 0 STORES           1950 2005 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2209870       9932         
50434323050150420 MIKLOR EQUITIES INC        3,234,270.00 0 STORES           1940 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     359270       3500         
50434323050150440 237-243 WORTH AVENUE LTD PARTNERSHIP REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PRTNS C/O       7,112,845.00 0 STORES           1925 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1487470       8528         
50434323050150480 HOLZER JANE B        6,708,300.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     443630       4732         
50434323050150480 HOLZER JANE B        6,708,300.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     639670       5643         
50434323050150520 MADDEN FAMILY ASSOCIATES LTD ANTHONY MARINO JR C/O       7,517,120.00 0 STORES           1950 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3298370      16374         
50434323050160010 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD        5,401,968.00 0 STORES           1945 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     380090       6750         
50434323050160090 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES II LP        1,162,819.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 00 03 00 1      39642       2486       2734       2300                 
50434323050160110 FOX YOLANDE & CHERIF GUELLAL % FRED GOBIC       1,366,006.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 03 00 1     246482       2070       2178       1873                 
50434323050160130 SECOND WORTH COMPANY LLC        23,600,000.00 1.01 DEPT STORE           2000 2000 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF   18342810      48578         
50434323050160160 LEFKOWITZ ELISE G 2005 C TRUST LEFKOWITZ ELISE G 2005 M TRUST       2,211,356.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 03 03 00 1     523587       3064       3221       2807                 
50434323050160250 MARUCCI GEORGE JR        1,789,557.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 03 00 2     647582       3488       4069       3057                 
50434323050160270 KELLER MICHAEL I VEALE DANIEL L       1,348,160.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1975 00 02 00 2      53766        742        756        720                 
50434323050160270 KELLER MICHAEL I VEALE DANIEL L       1,348,160.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1975 00 03 01 2     178154       2827       2827       2827                 
50434323050160361 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.01 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050160380 WHALOU PROPERTIES III LLC        19,552,213.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1974 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    8545020      49401         
50434323050160600 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD LOVE REALTY  C/O       6,200,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1971 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1504950      10716         
50434323050160600 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD LOVE REALTY  C/O       6,200,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1979 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      54870        156         
50434323050170011 WORTH AVENUE ASSOC LTD        34,500,000.00 2.02 SH CTR CMMITY           1979 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1635080      37017         
50434323050170011 WORTH AVENUE ASSOC LTD        34,500,000.00 2.02 SH CTR CMMITY           1979 1990 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF   11559640      91638         
50434323050170012 WORTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES LTD THE GOODMAN CO PHILIPS POINT C/O       7,347,480.00 0 DEPT STORE           1979 1990 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    7347480      62484         
50434323050180010 POWER LOVE ASSOC LOVE REALTY C/O       14,115,315.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1794810      13069         
50434323050180010 POWER LOVE ASSOC LOVE REALTY C/O       14,115,315.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2854150      19533         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1931 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2924970      32380         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1936 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     471030       4055         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     266880       2720         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1958 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     462950       4556         
50434323050180170 WORTH PONDFIELD WAXMAN MARK C/O       5,682,190.00 0 STORES           1956 2005 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2347190       7592         
50434323050180190 NAPOLEON PALM BEACH        6,614,630.00 0.25 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     563260       2382         
50434323050180190 NAPOLEON PALM BEACH        6,614,630.00 0.25 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1069570       6058         
50434323050180212 MASTERS ROSLYN H & MARJORIE HAUSMAN       2,047,870.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES 1925 1929 00 01 00 1      38950        922        966        790 1925 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     174670       2139         
50434323050180230 MODA IMPORTS INC        15,594,348.00 0 STORES           1950 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1672910      15035         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1920 1990 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME    6276050      80380         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1966 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2257990      24352         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1980 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     101220        709         
50434323050190200 NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF FLA TR        4,383,539.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1931 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1048030       9509         
50434323050190220 LOVE 300        10,925,554.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    3413610      25272         
50434323050200010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 6.97 AIRPORT/MARINA           1970 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      38560        490         
50434323050200010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 6.97 AIRPORT/MARINA           1970 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      97090       2150         
50434323050200020 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,690,298.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1988 05 06 00 2    1668888       5176       5442       5062                 
50434323050200030 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.3759 MUNICIPAL           1922 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2407330      25115         
50434323050200040 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.395 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050230491 WHALOU PROPERTIES II LLC        9,993,780.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1966 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4385040      28548         
50434323050230510 BATMASIAN JAMES H & BATMASIAN MARTA T       7,025,811.00 0 PROF OFFICES           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3813790      12948         
50434323050230520 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       3,544,619.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     327230      16836         
50434323050230530 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 2 LLC &       16,092,842.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF   12875830      46373         
50434323050230541 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       10,293,885.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1962 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6335160      25316         
50434323050230541 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       10,293,885.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     832110       7462         
50434323050230611 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       2,857,816.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050230612 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       532,800.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050240421 LAKE TRAIL        927,865.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1970 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME     297040       2662         
50434323050240422 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS INC       0.00 0 ORPHNG/NON-PROF           1949 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1065350      14045         
50434323050240422 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS INC       0.00 0 ORPHNG/NON-PROF           1966 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     918350      10250         
50434323050240440 BROADWAY RPW REV STATUTORY TRUST BROADWAY RPW ADMIN C/O       8,893,833.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1960 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2471120      26404         
50434323050240460 SCM ROYAL PALM INVESTORS LLC & ATTN: JONATHAN SATTER       8,081,172.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1974 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4793330      21632         
50434323050240470 SCM ROYAL PALM INVESTORS LLC & ATTN: JONATHAN SATTER       12,000,000.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1968 2000 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6919210      25776         
50434323050240480 THREE NINETY SIX LTD PRTNRSHP ATTN: REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS       4,452,710.00 0.46 FINANCIAL           1997 1997 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1250010       7870         
50434323050250011 BRADEN JAMES B & BRADEN KIRSTEN W       1,088,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 2      45690        590        596        576                 
50434323050250011 BRADEN JAMES B & BRADEN KIRSTEN W       1,088,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 02 00 2     144795       1788       1872       1752                 
50434323050250012 KASPER CYNTHIA        834,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 00 02 00 1      37548        486        577        273                 
50434323050250012 KASPER CYNTHIA        834,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1990 00 02 01 2     244563       2131       2295       2060                 
50434323050250013 FRANKEL FRANK        2,123,085.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1991 00 04 00 2     533635       3928       4088       3848                 
50434323050250013 FRANKEL FRANK        2,123,085.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 1      37271        483        686        288                 
50434323050250021 MATTHEWS JACK &        2,684,245.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 05 06 01 2    1106710       4193       4478       3806                 
50434323050250022 MURDOCK LINTON F & NANCY W MURDOCK NANCY W       887,016.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 06 06 01 2    1106710       4193       4478       3806                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1965 00 01 00 2       2887        669        682        664                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1975 00 02 00 2       9830       2408       2458       2332                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1975 01 03 01 2       9266       2043       2072       2030                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1959 1965 00 02 00 1       2560        744        756        741                 
50434323050250050 215 BRAZILIAN HOLDING LLC        3,000,000.00 0 VACANT COMM                           
50434323050250061 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS        350.00 0.06 VACANT COMM                           
50434323050250071 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS        2,086,525.00 0 STORES           1935 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     372780       4729         
50434323050250072 THIRTY SIXTY SOUTH OCEAN INC        1,826,560.00 0 STORES           1945 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     166200       3630         
50434323050250072 THIRTY SIXTY SOUTH OCEAN INC        1,826,560.00 0 STORES           1945 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     220360       4539         
50434323050250351 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS CAMPANIELLO IMPORTS LTD C/O       3,381,293.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1130490      16885         
50434323050250352 MILTON PARTNERSHIP LTD LESLIE C FELDMAN C/O       1,283,510.00 0 STORES           1925 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     262710       4700         
50434323050250361 BNB VENTURES PALM BEACH I LLC LEONARD I ACKERMAN C/O       2,070,531.00 0 VACANT COMM           1924 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     109750       7291         
50434323050250370 BROADWAY RPW REV STAT TRUST        5,144,749.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1946 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1941350      12446         
50434323050250380 BESSEMER BUILDING CORP        5,496,917.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1989 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2514340      11694         
50434323050250390 FJK PROP INC        6,534,708.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1957 2007 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    3325640      19242         
50434323050250400 F J K III PROP INC        4,740,951.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1950 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1535590      10296         
50434323050250411 NHM REALTY LLC        8,289,320.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1975 1980 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    5011850      23998         
50434323050260081 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       2,650,000.00 0 STORES           1950 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     566660       8464         
50434323050260082 BESSENROTH MARGRIT        1,473,130.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     204030       2616         
50434323050260082 BESSENROTH MARGRIT        1,473,130.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     424880       5586         
50434323050260090 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       2,182,114.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323050260101 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       1,000,000.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323050260102 DORRIS VIVIAN P TRUSTEE DORRIS VIVIAN P TRUST       1,182,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1985 00 03 01 2     164560       5282       6608       3735                 
50434323050260110 ROGER KENT INVESTMENTS INC RUG DOCTON C/O       3,606,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     162504       2502       3124       1932                 
50434323050260110 ROGER KENT INVESTMENTS INC RUG DOCTON C/O       3,606,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 01 2     197906       2957       3008       2839                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      22417        270        338        169                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      62016        768        960        480                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 01 2     471173       4776       5062       4670                 
50434323050260130 BOURNE INVESTMENTS INC        4,306,094.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1995 04 03 01 1    1055141       4681       5189       4082                 
50434323050260140 BAGBY JOSEPH R & MARTHA G BAGBY MARTHA G       804,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1941 02 01 00 1      42891        593        780        546                 
50434323050260140 BAGBY JOSEPH R & MARTHA G BAGBY MARTHA G       804,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 04 03 01 2     310367       3728       4233       3144                 
50434323050260151 THREE HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN        2,372,760.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050260310 ROYAL 160 LLC        14,000,000.00 1.38 MOTEL           1996 2000 0030 01 3 FIRE PROOF    9454140      54038         
50434323050260340 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       5,408,512.00 0 FINANCIAL           1971 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2204480      19500         
50434323050260600 ROLAND ASSOC I LTD FELLERS SCHEWE ET AL INC C/O       5,618,613.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2413010      13846         
50434323050270011 CARALEX REALTY CO LLC        3,466,664.00 0.43 SERV STATIONS           1956 1974 0004 01 2 FIRE RESIS     206820       2248         
50434323050270012 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.5 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050270141 SKY TRUST TR HILDT DOROTHY TREMAINE       2,418,357.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2    1214209       4352       4735       3965                 
50434323050270142 HARRIS DOROTHY W        2,312,829.00 0.17 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2    1068255       4100       4504       3710                 
50434323050270280 336 PARTNERS INC        2,051,980.00 0 STORES           1928 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     681980       6252         
50434323050270300 332 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD        1,615,584.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1935 1955 0019 01 1 WOOD FRAME     244030       9402         
50434323050270320 R D OF PALM BEACH INC        3,526,800.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1471800      18796         
50434323050270330 336 PARTNERS INC        3,659,806.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1961 03 04 00 2       9406       2455       2878       2338                 
50434323050270371 REYNOLDS ROBERT L &        3,803,868.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2    1945574       4995       5636       4514                 
50434323050270372 WIGGINS SHARON & WIGGINS WILLIAM B JR       3,182,208.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1371462       4936       5680       4425                 
50434323050270401 GAINES STANLEY N GAINES GAY H       3,235,404.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2    1374217       4949       5618       4501                 
50434323050270402 JDO PALM BEACH LLC        3,791,643.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1930456       4959       5663       4503                 
50434323050280200 BURCH ROBERT L & RED BADGE INC C/O       4,144,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 00 03 01 2    1094614       6180       7178       5327                 
50434323050280211 ANGIULI NICK        841,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     163087       1302       1445        968                 
50434323050280211 ANGIULI NICK        841,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 00 03 01 3     734779       3722       3722       3722                 
50434323050280212 MCCARTHY THOMAS O        5,526,636.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    2171911       7615       8206       6940                 
50434323050280250 PAGLIARI RICHARD A        5,072,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 06 01 2    2169864       6251       7232       5693                 
50434323050280280 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       1,991,750.00 0 STORES                           
50434323050280290 331 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LLC GOLDNER LIDIA       4,585,764.00 0 STORES           1957 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1282490       9676         
50434323050280331 331 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LLC JOEL P KOEPPEL C/O       1,795,241.00 0 FINANCIAL           1959 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     423320       3105         
50434323050280351 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.54 MUNICIPAL           1986 1986 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3471090      18558         
50434323050280410 BRYANT ELIZABETH        490,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1965 00 04 00 2     136937       2277       2524       2188                 
50434323050280410 BRYANT ELIZABETH        490,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      78854       1293       1521        761                 
50434323050280421 HYPERION FARMS MYCFO INC C/O       2,086,985.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1980 04 03 00 1     203841       2813       3270       2504                 
50434323050280440 PIZZAGALLI JAMES C & PIZZAGALLI JUDITH R       3,495,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    1069110       5524       5929       5062                 
50434323050280460 PAMEL GREGORY J & PAMEL JAMES &       1,521,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1970 00 01 00 2      81098       1125       1440        540                 
50434323050280460 PAMEL GREGORY J & PAMEL JAMES &       1,521,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1980 00 01 01 2     168210       2043       2160       1936                 
50434323050280470 INDOE WILLIAM &        3,020,181.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    1120008       4099       4457       3667                 
50434323050280481 CHAMBERS JACK C CHAMBERS INGEBURG R       1,567,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1960 00 01 00 2      54026        658        794        360                 
50434323050280481 CHAMBERS JACK C CHAMBERS INGEBURG R       1,567,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1985 03 03 01 2     468934       5002       5465       4376                 
50434323050280510 STONE RICHARD L & LESLEY LESLEY STONE       577,173.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 01 00 2      61357        752        774        720                 
50434323050280510 STONE RICHARD L & LESLEY LESLEY STONE       577,173.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 00 03 00 2     406523       2994       3020       2976                 
50434323050280520 RSDL        1,604,114.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 00 2     126762       2268       2268       2268                 
50434323050280520 RSDL        1,604,114.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 00 03 01 2     209271       2691       3072       2511                 
50434323060000010 ANDRESEN KARL HEINZ & TAURUS INVEST HOLDINGS C/O..L.G KASSOF       10,024,877.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 04 01 2    2590686       7039       7919       6468                 
50434323060000010 ANDRESEN KARL HEINZ & TAURUS INVEST HOLDINGS C/O..L.G KASSOF       10,024,877.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 01 01 2     383307       2297       2928       1980                 
50434323060000021 MCFARLANE CATHLEEN        4,317,018.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 04 04 00 2    1521902       7465       7620       7416                 
50434323060000021 MCFARLANE CATHLEEN        4,317,018.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 00 03 01 1      73129        573        632        436                 
50434323060000040 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,422,467.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 00 01 00 1      21932        245        326          1                 
50434323060000040 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,422,467.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 04 03 01 3    1362922       4093       4252       3756                 
50434323070000010 HANNON KEVIN S        1,011,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1967   2070    1011150 
50434323070000020 BROD JOHN & BROD LISBETH       850,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1009050 
50434323070000030 GERRITY EDWARD J JR        1,270,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1270500 
50434323070000040 REYNOLDS JANET R TR        1,205,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1205400 
50434323070000050 MERCER DALE T        1,083,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1270500 
50434323070000060 ASTIC JOANNA        310,307.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1009050 
50434323070000070 REMMERT ELIZABETH D ELIZABETH REMMERT TR TITL HLDR       752,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     940800 
50434323070000080 LONG ROBERT E JR        1,029,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1029050 
50434323070000090 LONG ROBERT E JR        1,295,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1295500 
50434323070000100 SNL HOLDINGS LLC        1,230,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1230400 
50434323070000110 ROTH ROSE B        362,766.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1295500 
50434323070000120 REYNOLDS JANET R WILEY R REYNOLDS RESIDUARY TRUST       319,603.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1029050 
50434323070000130 VALENTINE EUGENE M VALENTINE E MASSIE JR &       960,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     960800 
50434323070000140 RUBIN SHIRLEY        1,049,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1049050 
50434323070000150 CROSSMAN CRAIG        1,320,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1320500 
50434323070000160 FINCH MEREDITH K        362,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1255400 
50434323070000170 FINCH MEREDITH K        372,560.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1320500 
50434323070000180 MILLER ANNE C        1,049,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1049050 
50434323070000190 SCHMERTZ HERBERT        930,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     980800 
50434323070000200 HALLOCK BERT        338,194.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1069050 
50434323070000210 ELMORE WILLIAM E JR & ELMORE BRENT W       955,866.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1345500 
50434323070000220 WARWICK CHARLES H III & WARWICK ELSIE C       788,874.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1280400 
50434323070000230 MOORE STARR        1,345,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1345500 
50434323070000240 ARMFIELD WILLIAM J IV & JANE H        1,069,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1069050 
50434323070000250 ARMFIELD IV WILLIAM J        1,000,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1000800 
50434323070000260 MANESS CAROLYN J TR        1,657,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1657950 
50434323070000270 FISHMAN IRVING        793,813.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1657950 
50434323070000280 MARSTON HELGA M TRUST MARSTON HELGA TR       1,440,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1440600 
50434323070000290 GAYNOR SUSAN & GAYNOR VERE W       1,234,410.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1440600 
50434323070000300 WARWICK CHARLES H III & WARWICK ELSIE C       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1967    333      89250 
50434323070000310 MOORE STARR        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1967    268      89250 
50434323070000320 MARSTON HELGA M TRUST MARSTON HELGA TR       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1967    317      89250 
50434323070000330 ARMFIELD W J IV & JANE H        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1967    317      89250 
50434323080000010 GUENTHER FREDERICK R TRUST & LIPPINCOTT VIRGINIA G TR       536,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     534450 
50434323080000020 DUSAULT ALLEN J TRUST DUSAULT ELLEN F TR       535,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     534450 
50434323080000030 CURRY JOHN F III &        480,347.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000040 WILLIAMS NANCY J        479,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000050 GILLIGAN VIRGINIA K GILLIGAN VIRGINIA K TR       90,149.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000060 STONEHOUSE ROBERT W        539,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000070 NASTASIC PREDRAG TRUST & NASTASIC VIDOSAVA TRUST       544,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000080 MUNRO ALLISON MUNRO ALLISON TR       90,649.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000090 RUTHERFURD EDWARD C & EDWARD C RUTHERFORD TR TITL HLDR       322,986.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000100 CLECKNER ELIZABETH M        322,986.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323100000011 BRADWAY RUBY W        410,218.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1630650 
50434323100000012 CRAIG CHARLES S        933,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1416450 
50434323100000013 LA VOY KENNETH R JR &        1,712,330.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1969   4142    1843800 
50434323100000014 VASILY JOHN M & VASILY MEDINA S       915,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1969   2107     915600 
50434323100000015 HOFFER NATASHA I        438,841.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1969   1104     610050 
50434323100000016 RUTHERFURD ELIZABETH K RUTHERFURD ELIZABETH K TR       792,752.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0016 0400 CONDO 1969   2123     932400 
50434323100000017 MINSKY SYLVIA        384,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1139250 
50434323100000018 BOWDEN ELIZABETH M        1,612,169.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0018 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1788150 
50434323100000019 GERBETH JOHN        301,717.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0019 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1573950 
50434323100000021 MCKENNA PAUL J        923,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1041600 
50434323100000022 FERGUSON JOHN M & EUBANKS WILLIAM R       991,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1969   2097     991200 
50434323100000023 LIST THOMAS & BARBARA LIST BARBARA       185,763.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1058400 
50434323100000024 MARA ANN T        1,265,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1265250 
50434323100000025 POLZIN NANCY DOUGLAS EST        437,290.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1808150 
50434323100000026 MC CLOSKEY MARGERY        766,048.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1593950 
50434323100000027 BURTCH DEAN C & BURTCH CLARE V D       1,005,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0027 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1127750 
50434323100000028 HALPER HARRY A & SYLVIA S SYLVIA S HALPER       297,434.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0028 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1061600 
50434323100000029 OBRIEN TERRENCE P &        896,570.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0029 0400 CONDO 1969   2097    1011200 
50434323100000030 DUDLEY HENRY A &        1,078,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1078400 
50434323100000031 TELL WILLIAM K        1,285,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1285250 
50434323100000032 LYONS J PETER        883,604.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1828150 
50434323100000033 CONDRON P KEVIN & CONDRON CLARE K       1,613,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1613950 
50434323100000034 BAUMAN JAMES J        1,147,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1147750 
50434323100000035 GRAY HORACE A III & GRAY ELIZABETH       1,081,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1081600 
50434323100000036 KELLEY RUSSELL P JR        599,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1969   2097    1031200 
50434323100000037 REVSON MARTIN &        1,646,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0037 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1646400 
50434323100000038 MUSCARELLE JOSEPH L JR & MUSCARELLE SHARON M       1,305,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0038 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1305250 
50434323100000039 DEEMS RICHARD E & JEAN S        1,848,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0039 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1848150 
50434323100000040 PANTALONE IRENE        1,531,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1633950 
50434323100000041 AMOROSO JOAN M TR        1,167,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1167750 
50434323100000042 BALZEKAS STANLEY        1,101,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1101600 
50434323100000043 KOCH JOHN D & KOCH GIULIANA C       1,747,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1969   4220    1923600 
50434323100000045 CRAWFORD WILLIAM W & SANDRA K CRAWFORD SANDRA K       429,836.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1325250 
50434323100000046 HIGGINS JAMES F        3,710,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1969   2870    3710700 
50434323100000047 COLLINS JOHN T        1,958,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0047 0400 CONDO 1969   2243    1958250 
50434323100000048 MADDEN PETER E        1,493,052.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0048 0400 CONDO 1969   1941    1958250 
50434323100000049 SWAN THOMAS J JR & CARROLL D        2,926,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0049 0400 CONDO 1969   2728    2926350 
50434323110000010 MOULTON ROBERT M & MOULTON DEBORAH A       368,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1970    864     368550 
50434323110000020 CAMPBELL DAWN A        109,786.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000030 GREZELL MARGARITA        178,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1970    481     248850 
50434323110000040 MAXSON KELLI        59,243.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000050 BENTLEY GRETCHEN        278,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000060 SMITH HILLEN J JR        368,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1970    864     368550 
50434323110000070 SCHOONMAKER ELLA B        352,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1970    864     352800 
50434323110000080 HAAS ROBERTA TR        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000090 NESTORA VERONICA        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000100 HEWITT SARA M        178,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1970    481     233100 
50434323110000110 GURCIULLO ANDREA        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000120 FORTE PATRICK A        275,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1970    864     352800 
50434323110000130 PRYOR LUIS C & JOANNA J PRYOR JOANNA J       88,215.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1970    864     373550 
50434323110000140 FOX SEYMOUR        333,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000150 BOLAND THOMAS P        253,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1970    481     253850 
50434323110000160 ANGLE RAY A & J CHRISTIAN ANGLE H/W       53,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000170 RICHARDSON GARY C        333,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000180 MURPHY JAMES J        373,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1970    864     373550 
50434323110000190 KREITSEK WILLIAM A SR & KREITSEK DOLORES       357,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1970    864     357800 
50434323110000200 LESHER JAMES B        317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000210 BISHOP SUSAN        317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000220 BURNS FRANCES C        238,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1970    481     238100 
50434323110000230 WELSH CHARLES N III & YOUNG CARLA W       317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000240 HARDING JACQUELINE K        357,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1970    864     357800 
50434323110000250 DONAHUE JAMES B & LINDA P DONAHUE       598,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     594300 
50434323110000260 LANGE GLORIA P LANGE GLORIA P TR       532,980.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     594300 
50434323110000270 BRADLEY WILLIAM W        576,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     573300 
50434323110000280 FRANZKE VOLKER TERRANCE        576,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     573300 
50434323120000012 SHOOR BETTE G        275,683.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1014300 
50434323120000013 EDELMAN RICHARD M        2,400,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2400300 
50434323120000014 FLEISCHER RUTH J FLEISCHER JACK       627,421.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2400300 
50434323120000015 INTERNATIONAL ANTIQUES OF BAHAMAS        1,126,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1126650 
50434323120000017 ALTON HOWARD R JR & ALTON CAMILLA A       911,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1977   1250     911400 
50434323120000021 ETELMAN ETHEL        426,368.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    1961400 
50434323120000022 JAFFE SUSAN O W        1,250,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1250550 
50434323120000023 GRAHAM JOHN K TRUSTEE CROSBY ADVISORS C/O       2,977,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2977800 
50434323120000024 DASILVA WILLARD H & FRANCES A        2,977,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2977800 
50434323120000025 MILSTEIN RICHARD & JORDAN S RUBOY       1,362,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1362900 
50434323120000026 REMMERT ELIZABETH D REMMERT ELIZABETH D TR       2,285,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2285850 
50434323120000031 CLIFFORD STEWART B TRUST CLIFFORD STEWART B TR       1,986,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    1986400 
50434323120000032 COOLEY DAVID L & CHRISTINE        1,275,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1275550 
50434323120000033 COCOZIELLO SUSAN        3,027,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3027800 
50434323120000034 BAKER JON & BAKER PATRICIA       3,027,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3027800 
50434323120000035 MARTIG JOHN A III        1,387,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1387900 
50434323120000036 HANCOCK WILLIAM G CATHCART MONOMOY REALTY TRUST       2,260,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2310850 
50434323120000041 HIRST NANCY M TRUST HIRST BUSINESS OFFICE C/O       2,011,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2011400 
50434323120000042 MARINO JOSEPHINE        722,070.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1275550 
50434323120000043 SELTZER GLORIA        687,481.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3077800 
50434323120000044 DE LACAM JUDITH DE LACAM ALAIN       2,510,580.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3077800 
50434323120000045 LANASHEL HLDG LTD        1,412,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1412900 
50434323120000046 ROCCA LEONORA W LEONORA W ROCCA TR TI HLDR       514,497.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2335850 
50434323120000051 BIVINS OLIVER W & BIVINS LORNA M       2,073,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2073750 
50434323120000052 GRIFFITH J BRAD GRIFFITH PATRICIA       1,366,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1366050 
50434323120000053 BIRKENFELD RICHARD & BIRKENFELD RUTH       3,200,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3200400 
50434323120000054 ALTON HOWARD R JR & ALTON CAMILLA A       2,587,830.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3200400 
50434323120000055 BERGER E EDITH BERGER E EDITH TR       380,177.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1478400 
50434323120000056 CHIOTELLIS P N & LAVINIA        2,299,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2299500 
50434323140001010 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A        294,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1010 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140001020 DUPONT WILLIS H        1,004,151.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1020 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140001030 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A        234,176.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1030 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002010 BAGATELLE COMMERCIAL LLC        600,876.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2010 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002020 METTLER PETER W        466,926.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2020 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002030 PALM BEACH BOARD OF REALTORS INC        391,876.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2030 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002040 DUPONT WILLIS H        756,676.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2040 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002050 PALM BEACH BOARD OF REALTORS INC        1,016,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2050 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002060 SANCHEZ & MADDUX INC        826,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2060 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323260000000 THREE HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965      0        125 
50434323260001010 CROVO CHARLES R II        1,191,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1191750 
50434323260001020 HAWKWORTH TRUST HOROWITZ ELIZABETH J TR &       1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1001700 
50434323260001030 CARTER JOHN M TRUST        1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1001700 
50434323260001040 DOFFERMYRE MARY BROWN LOW        1,181,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1181250 
50434323260001050 GRZEBIEN JOHN & GRZEBIEN CHARLOTTE       575,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     575400 
50434323260001060 MCGINNESS NEIL        575,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     575400 
50434323260001070 HUSSEY LEO J & HUSSEY SUSAN E       585,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     585900 
50434323260001080 VAN DURAND ANN        260,872.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607950 
50434323260002010 KINLIN ROBERT & KINLIN ELLEN       1,216,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1216750 
50434323260002020 FOSTER JAMES C & FOSTER AUDREY S       1,802,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2B 0510 CO-OP 1965   3602    1802850 
50434323260002040 MCGINNESS NEIL        361,321.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1206250 
50434323260002050 LEE FRANK W JR & LEE MARY I       597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002060 MORGAN VIRGINIA        597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002070 MULLEN DORAN        597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002080 SCHMITZ RENATE        617,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617950 
50434323260003010 COLLINS CAROL O        237,863.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1241750 
50434323260003020 COLLINS CAROL O TR        1,051,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1051700 
50434323260003030 ANDERSON STANTON D        1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1051700 
50434323260003040 GRANT PATRICIA J TRUST &        1,231,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1231250 
50434323260003050 DE MELLO MARIE & JOHN DE MELLO JR       56,265.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003060 ROEMMELE HERBERT A        607,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003070 DRESNER MILTON H        306,844.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003080 SMITH WALTER E JR WALTER E SMITH JR TR TITL HLDR       426,890.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627950 
50434323260004010 PERIALE MARY E        238,748.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1266750 
50434323260004020 IMPERIAL MOIRA T & GRONBERG TARA I       1,076,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1076700 
50434323260004030 FARIS GEORGE N        1,076,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1076700 
50434323260004040 MORGAN VIRGINIA E        840,436.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1256250 
50434323260004050 RYAN JOHN J & RYAN MARY A       397,020.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004060 MATTIE BETTY J TR        261,372.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004070 GOWDY GERALDINE O        617,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004080 EKSTRACT EILEEN        637,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     637950 
50434323260005010 MCLENDON JOYCE W        238,748.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1291750 
50434323260005020 CLARKE ROSALIND        1,051,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1101700 
50434323260005030 MAHER THOMAS D JR & MAHER YVONNE B       1,101,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1101700 
50434323260005040 LIGHTHIZER ROBERT E        1,281,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1281250 
50434323260005050 KRENER ROBERT J. TR        627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005060 PAULINO BEN & PAULINO MARY       627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005070 LENNON HUGH & JANICE H        627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005080 PARKS DOROTHY B        283,774.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     647950 
50434323260006010 HALL ANDREW J        1,855,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHA 0510 CO-OP 1965   2565    1855350 
50434323260006020 SLATER SUSAN H BISHOP        1,048,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHB 0510 CO-OP 1965   1466    1048950 
50434323260006030 WALSH MICHAEL & WALSH HELEN       1,464,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   2093    1514100 
50434323260006040 HALL ANDREW &        990,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHD 0510 CO-OP 1965   2093     990150 
50434323260006050 POWELL SARA D        277,511.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHE 0510 CO-OP 1965   2093    1003800 
50434326000010010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.03 MUNICIPAL                           
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1957 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2197240      23136         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1963 1963 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     103630       3131         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1964 1964 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     137580       3692         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1972 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     219500       3395         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1989 1989 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     294240       3813         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1995 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     104400       2016         
50434326000010040 EXTOR E & MARY J        882,381.00 0.09 MFR <10 UNITS           1930 1955 0006 01 1 WOOD FRAME      70860       2656         
50434326000010050 EXTOR MARY J        367,687.00 0.07 MFR <10 UNITS 1930 1930 00 02 00 2      64535       1563       1651       1434                 
50434326000010070 CH VILLAS LLC &        400,000.00 0.19 MOTEL                           
50434326000010080 COLONY HOTEL INC        7,000,000.00 1.05 MOTEL           1947 1990 0083 01 2 FIRE RESIS    6020220      64592         
50434326000010080 COLONY HOTEL INC        7,000,000.00 1.05 MOTEL           1994 1994 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     770550       7146         
50434326000010130 CH VILLAS LLC &        3,284,471.00 1.39 MOTEL           1922 1985 0007 01 1 WOOD FRAME     630910      13195         
50434326000010160 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434326000010170 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1981 1981 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      67040       1020         
50434326000020020 MYERS STEPHEN E MYERS STEPHEN E TR       17,396,464.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 09 10 01 2    6268846      18253      22474      15362                 
50434326000020030 KREHBIEL F A II & KATHLEEN K        9,894,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 08 01 2    4699075      12594      15127      11298                 
50434326000020040 COHEN JACQUES & COHEN FRANCOISE       1,662,777.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 00 01 00 1      63049        748        894        408                 
50434326000020040 COHEN JACQUES & COHEN FRANCOISE       1,662,777.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1995 03 04 00 3     659455       5178       5614       4899                 
50434326000020050 EL VEDADO LLC        17,814,973.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 07 05 2    5607740      14044      16405      12913                 
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 01 02 00 1       5248        816        816        816                 
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1955 05 06 01 2      65239       7893       8670       6000                 
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1974 01 01 00 1       6016       1674       2388       1368                 
50434326000020070 SHALEK BERDONNA WEINGARTEN BERDONNA WEINGARTEN SHALEK TR TITL HLDR       2,318,810.00 0.69 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 04 06 01 2    1716838       5802       6602       5100                 
50434326000020080 SCHUSTER GERALD        11,328,193.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2000 05 08 00 2    2562986      11752      12614      10033                 
50434326000020090 FANJUL JOSE F & EMILIA M FANJUL EMILIA M       3,136,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 07 01 3    2107389      10619      12398       8456                 
50434326000020090 FANJUL JOSE F & EMILIA M FANJUL EMILIA M       3,136,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1957 01 01 00 1      29700        384        384        384                 
50434326000020110 TRUMP IVANA        8,065,839.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 07 01 2    2099615      14192      18316      12352                 
50434326000020120 SILVER LADY MANAGEMENT LLC        10,355,559.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 2005 05 07 01 3    3925552      12881      14548      11365                 
50434326000020130 ABONY LORNE KOEPPEL LAW GROUP PL C/O       5,451,697.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 2000 04 06 01 2     821878       6840       7407       6426                 
50434326000020150 VLAHOS DEAN & VLAHOS MICHELLE       8,642,637.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 2000 05 08 01 3    2298173      10492      11729       9714                 
50434326000020160 BANYAN VENTURE        5,297,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1970 04 06 01 3     683107       6246       6913       5595                 
50434326000020170 DOGWOOD LAND CO LLC        8,512,878.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326000020180 BERMAN MARTIN L        4,620,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 05 07 01 2     233811      11162      13303       9653                 
50434326000020190 CHARLES S ROBERT FUND OAR LLC CHARLES S ROBERT FUND PP LP       15,671,263.00 1.95 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 03 03 01 3      15397       3355       4061       2453                 
50434326000020190 CHARLES S ROBERT FUND OAR LLC CHARLES S ROBERT FUND PP LP       15,671,263.00 1.95 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 05 09 01 3     129063      15459      17292      14676                 
50434326000020200 BARDES MERRILYN BARDES MERRILYN TR       6,368,930.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 08 01 3    2178502      11134      13077       7157                 
50434326000020210 TRUE 680 MR. MARK FREITAS C/O       8,203,687.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 07 08 02 2    3550817      12406      13093      11497                 
50434326000020220 CLOUD MARJORIE E        872,099.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1960 05 03 01 2     357921       4271       4548       4008                 
50434326000020230 SCHWARTZ GERALD W        7,533,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1998 05 06 01 1    1036939       8630      10405       7654                 
50434326000020230 SCHWARTZ GERALD W        7,533,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1998 02 03 00 1     140443       1640       1640       1640                 
50434326000020240 MOODY WILLIAM F & LANDRY DANA E       5,828,935.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1986 05 05 00 2    1209264       6959       7091       6651                 
50434326000020250 VAN SCHAICK D L        5,348,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 01 01 00 1      78058       1012       1246        528                 
50434326000020250 VAN SCHAICK D L        5,348,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 04 04 01 2    1127633       5620       5870       5558                 
50434326000020260 ALLEN JOSEPH        5,392,089.00 0.58 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 01 2    2348149       7354       8524       6467                 
50434326000020270 DIXON F EUGENE JR        16,924,391.00 1.5708 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 07 01 2    8172775      13102      15038      11862                 
50434326000020280 SPROCK H MARTIN III        6,264,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1995 05 06 01 2     518806       5326       5471       4988                 
50434326000020280 SPROCK H MARTIN III        6,264,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 01 01 00 1      76538        737        737        737                 
50434326000020290 SAMSON PB LLC        6,037,500.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326000020300 SLIFKA ALFRED        6,764,068.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 03 2    3030674       7412       8787       6197                 
50434326000020310 KAHN GILBERT S &        7,852,050.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 04 02 2    2525299       8790      10447       7956                 
50434326000020320 BOCKMANN MARIA K        6,980,501.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 08 00 2    1942129       7721       8164       7194                 
50434326000020330 NORRIS PATRICIA G NORRIS SANDRA L       929,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1950 01 02 00 1      69508        816        976        460                 
50434326000020330 NORRIS PATRICIA G NORRIS SANDRA L       929,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 03 03 01 2     386296       3734       3846       3660                 
50434326000020340 HANLEY WILLIAM L JR HANLEY ALICE H       3,533,671.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 02 02 00 2     173521       1773       2035       1160                 
50434326000020340 HANLEY WILLIAM L JR HANLEY ALICE H       3,533,671.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 04 04 01 2    1464952       6626       7685       5919                 
50434326000020350 MILLER FRANK A        2,023,299.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1990 04 04 01 3    1746500       6200       6874       5521                 
50434326000020360 LOW K PRESCOTT &        4,214,074.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1990 04 05 00 2    1571895       6460       7912       5580                 
50434326000020370 RAMSING THOR H        1,602,882.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1950 04 03 01 1     309160       4025       4111       3823                 
50434326000020380 RATHBORNE CAROL SIMMONS        3,781,121.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 2000 05 05 01 2    1896622       6874       7581       6308                 
50434326000020390 MCATEE JOHN J JR &        3,108,155.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 2000 04 04 01 2    1346731       5784       6149       5242                 
50434326000020400 BALLINGER WYNNE S TRUST        2,914,601.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 02 01 00 1     139995       1869       2200       1100                 
50434326000020400 BALLINGER WYNNE S TRUST        2,914,601.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 05 06 00 3    1437900       6243       6603       6171                 
50434326000020410 BELL LOWRY M JR & DIANA M BELL DIANA M       4,085,183.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 05 06 00 2    2115564       7655       8574       6259                 
50434326000020420 KOZLOFF PAUL J KOZLOFF PAUL J TR       5,742,956.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 06 01 2    2433603       8413      10006       7055                 
50434326000020430 ROUSSEAU LILLIAN ROUSSEAU LILLIAN M TR       3,099,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1947 00 02 00 2      78546       1260       1260       1260                 
50434326000020430 ROUSSEAU LILLIAN ROUSSEAU LILLIAN M TR       3,099,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1983 05 07 01 2    1450585       7328       7770       6973                 
50434326000020450 TOLL BRUCE E &        14,607,561.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 00 00 2    3989267      12064      15630      10982                 
50434326000020450 TOLL BRUCE E &        14,607,561.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 01 00 2     242385       1673       2071        964                 
50434326000020460 DIAMOND JANICE        10,386,841.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 02 00 2     188576       1394       1747        852                 
50434326000020460 DIAMOND JANICE        10,386,841.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 12 05 01 2    2990223       8341      11594       6807                 
50434326000020480 CURTIS ALAN & CHRISTINE W CURTIS CHRISTINE W       6,235,326.00 1.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 05 08 01 3    3728064      11333      13730      10014                 
50434326000020500 LUMSDEN GARY R        1,830,507.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1980 03 03 00 2     286575       3349       3828       2600                 
50434326000020510 PETRIE CARROLL        6,515,925.00 0.81 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1992 05 06 01 2    1904616       6429       6681       6146                 
50434326000020520 ENGELSTEIN ALEC &        8,134,605.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 2000 00 08 00 2    2237557      10449      11815       9025                 
50434326000020530 CONDREN WILLIAM J        4,832,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 05 01 2    3100039      10221      11365       9166                 
50434326000020540 DUNN WILLIAM A        7,781,777.00 0.6546 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 05 08 01 2    3530475      10402      12623       8811                 
50434326000020550 CANTOR IRIS CANTOR IRIS TR       9,257,637.00 0.91 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 08 00 2    2425743       9091      10808       8004                 
50434326010020011 BCD INVESTORS LLP        3,893,739.00 0.84 RESTAURANT           1928 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     865520       8967         
50434326010020012 SIRENITY INVESTORS LTD        1,259,584.00 0 MULTIFAMILY           1940 1985 0011 01 2 FIRE RESIS     379290       7680         
50434326010020051 SLOANE A RICHARD SLOANE CAROLYN J       2,858,909.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    1909670       4708       5595       4256                 
50434326010020052 CUMMINGS-KARP HELENE        2,776,874.00 0.1686 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    2197963       5455       6121       4967                 
50434326010020061 LIGGETT ROBERT G JR TRUST ROBERT G LIGGETT TR       2,660,462.00 0.17 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    1705671       5464       6321       4822                 
50434326010020070 BCD INVESTORS LLP        2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326010030010 470 SOUTH OCEAN LLC        2,990,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326020000010 DRAIME CECILE M DRAIME DAVID M TR       4,993,391.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    2712269       4903       5320       4395                 
50434326020000020 JAMES DANIEL H & SYLVIA JAMES SYLVIA       782,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 04 05 01 2     425412       4149       4838       2985                 
50434326020000031 CINQUE GAY ANN & CINQUE ALFRED J       776,989.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 01 01 00 1      68297       1166       1320       1128                 
50434326020000031 CINQUE GAY ANN & CINQUE ALFRED J       776,989.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 03 04 00 2     310924       2928       3219       2670                 
50434326020000040 ANTONINI PENELOPE F & ANTONINI MARION H       2,961,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 00 01 00 1      20453        258        289        245                 
50434326020000040 ANTONINI PENELOPE F & ANTONINI MARION H       2,961,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 00 03 01 3     891071       4286       4480       3808                 
50434326020000050 VANDERPOEL BARRIE OSBORN VANDERPOEL BARRIE OSBORN TR       4,248,768.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 06 09 01 2    1774583      10481      10772      10044                 
50434326020000070 GEYER ELLEN        1,728,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 04 05 01 3    1078537       6592       6908       6225                 
50434326020000091 GOLFVIEW HOLDINGS LLC        2,331,638.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 05 01 2     918796       5441       5737       4961                 
50434326020000092 JAMES WILLIAM E & WILLIAM E JAMES TR TITL HLDR       3,483,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1980 01 02 00 1      60514        550        550        550                 
50434326020000092 JAMES WILLIAM E & WILLIAM E JAMES TR TITL HLDR       3,483,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 04 05 00 2    1716016       5191       5825       4505                 
50434326020000110 WHELTON JOHN C & MAHNAZ WHELTON MAHNAZ       1,892,720.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 07 00 2    2084961       8311       9109       7594                 
50434326020000121 BAILEY IRVING W II        5,789,769.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 04 05 01 2    4713431       7932       8674       7422                 
50434326020000141 GRAEBNER CLARK E & GRAEBNER PATRICIA       3,604,957.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1986 04 06 01 2    2064544       5601       6057       5511                 
50434326020000142 BUTLER FRANK O II        1,442,112.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 3    1200354       6643       7066       5654                 
50434326020000160 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        25,140.00 0 GOLF COURSE                           
50434326020000170 BENT BRUCE D BENT BRUCE D TR       2,023,930.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 1    1679498       9222      10236       8477                 
50434326020000180 GILMOUR DAVID H & DAVID H GILMOUR TR HLDR       4,504,042.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 05 06 01 2    3164010       7296       7539       6862                 
50434326020000190 KELLY MICHAEL TR & KELLY EDWARD J JR TR       4,554,585.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 2000 04 04 01 2    1079771       4600       4959       3931                 
50434326030000011 KAHN PATRICIA A        2,320,169.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1945 04 04 01 2      17235       5478       6097       4705                 
50434326030000012 RADTKE JANINA TRUST        6,354,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1995 03 03 01 1     715432       3377       4227       2823                 
50434326030000030 LEVY MARK & LEVY JANET       9,755,093.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 04 06 01 2    3061340       9677      11418       8532                 
50434326030000040 FELDMAN ROBERT M & FELDMAN AMY       7,426,125.00 0.52 VACANT                           
50434326030000050 MCCARTHY R HARRISON        5,630,740.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 07 01 2    2822670       8613      11104       7544                 
50434326030000060 STRYKER JON 1976 TRUST STRYKER JON TR       7,426,125.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 05 09 01 2    2218667      12166      14568      10878                 
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 01 02 00 1      35548        348        699          1                 
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 02 00 1     138972       1125       1630        664                 
50434326030000091 ANDREWS CAROLYN P        2,820,166.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 3    1456106       8522       9508       7376                 
50434326030000092 NESBITT GERALDINE T TR        4,404,997.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 07 01 3     946140       9457      11034       8005                 
50434326030000100 PATTERSON JAMES A        11,029,102.00 1.3792 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 00 2     257838       1774       2452        841                 
50434326030000100 PATTERSON JAMES A        11,029,102.00 1.3792 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 01 2    3855797      13978      16762      12217                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1995 00 02 00 1     118564        996       1260        600                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1995 00 03 01 2    1918291       5798       6117       5157                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 01 01 01 2     115142        913       1106        529                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 05 08 01 2    3377769      10893      11733       9939                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 02 00 1     129360       1219       1320        984                 
50434326030000240 STRYKER JON TR        5,678,826.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 06 01 2    2082507       7002       7779       6626                 
50434326030000240 STRYKER JON TR        5,678,826.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 02 01 00 1     121104       1314       1722        710                 
50434326030000270 DOMMERICH LOUIS A & JANE M DOMMERICH JANE M       862,195.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 01 01 00 1      59734        652        652        652                 
50434326030000270 DOMMERICH LOUIS A & JANE M DOMMERICH JANE M       862,195.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 03 05 00 2     315437       3343       3494       3093                 
50434326030000290 PRESTON JOHN & PRESTON MONIKA       8,050,971.00 0.777 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1993 05 07 01 2    4631533       9766      10872       9065                 
50434326030000330 FOSTER JANE D        1,746,772.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 03 03 01 2     475160       4295       4598       3878                 
50434326030000350 GLAZER AVRAM & GLAZER JILL       7,732,016.00 0.89 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 05 08 00 2    2719987      12138      14001      11074                 
50434326030000360 WOOD ROBERT K        794,320.00 0.38 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 04 05 00 2     505643       4268       4426       3655                 
50434326030000400 GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E TRUST GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E TR       2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326030000411 GARRICK C STEPHENSON GULFSTREAM GUSTAFSON EDWIN JR TR       2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326030000430 STEPHENSON CLAIRE M GULFSTREAM ROAD TRUS GUSTAFSON EDWIN JR TR       2,934,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 03 03 01 2     629229       3017       3620       2551                 
50434326030000441 MAY ROBERT P MAY MARILYN R       3,300,378.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 2001 03 03 01 2    1609748       7024       8384       5925                 
50434326030000460 DAVIS MARK & DAVIS NANCY       2,773,441.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1970 03 04 00 2     440319       3962       4269       2916                 
50434326030000470 CHASE FLORENCE M        3,531,206.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 03 03 01 2     446669       4323       4589       3915                 
50434326030000470 CHASE FLORENCE M        3,531,206.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 02 02 00 1      91005       1222       1222       1222                 
50434326030000510 M R R HOLDING CORP        6,337,201.00 0.5401 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1955 00 01 00 1      21554        332        499        250                 
50434326030000510 M R R HOLDING CORP        6,337,201.00 0.5401 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 04 07 01 2    1127470       6710       7113       6441                 
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1956 01 02 00 2      82332       1056       1075       1012                 
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 03 04 01 2     835646       3788       4130       3696                 
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 01 00 1     107937        995       1770        348                 
50434326030000541 LAWRENCE R C JR        3,027,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 03 01 2     714317       4158       4410       3761                 
50434326030000560 ALLEN JOAN Z ALLEN JOAN Z TR       2,338,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 03 04 00 1      82543       4259       4678       3113                 
50434326030000580 PIZZA JOSEPH M &        4,001,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 01 2    1712455       5206       5427       4860                 
50434326030000600 WALLAU ALEX L WALLAU ALEX L TR       1,695,499.00 0.43 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1985 00 06 01 2    1173178       6696       7653       5577                 
50434326030000621 NAEGELE JENNIFER J        4,853,595.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 05 06 01 3    2546090       8782      10045       8088                 
50434326030000650 DRYER JOSEPH F JR &        1,466,082.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 08 00 2    1033572       7612       8660       7008                 
50434326030000671 MASHEK JOHN D JR        1,275,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 03 03 01 2     946034       4455       4646       4026                 
50434326030000750 ORTIZ PATINO UTA K        2,825,425.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1993 04 04 01 2    1378842       5695       6284       5609                 
50434326030000761 IRVINE HORACE H II &        3,114,431.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 04 01 2    1059706       4973       5348       4570                 
50434326030000771 SOTER WILLIAM J & SARAH R SOTER SARAH R       1,113,709.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 04 05 01 2    1198869       5811       7970       4660                 
50434326030000791 GLAZER JOEL M & TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS C/O       7,420,861.00 0.938 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 00 05 01 1      46271        360        360        360                 
50434326030000791 GLAZER JOEL M & TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS C/O       7,420,861.00 0.938 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 05 07 00 2    1293137       6234       7136       5764                 
50434326030000821 DAIGH GLORIA M        2,894,521.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 03 03 01 1     346333       4043       4601       3555                 
50434326030000831 MANN GEORGE S TR        2,735,766.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1992 02 03 01 2     870754       4056       4466       3378                 
50434326030000860 FRANK RAMSEY & FRANK SUZANNE       3,373,063.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 01 01 00 1      41558        381        381        381                 
50434326030000860 FRANK RAMSEY & FRANK SUZANNE       3,373,063.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1990 03 03 01 2    1023526       4635       5180       4136                 
50434326030000870 CENTRAL AVENUE INVESTMENTS LLC JASON P THEIN C/O THOMPSON COBURN       4,937,455.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 06 00 2    2003877       5830       6654       5253                 
50434326040000020 HARRISON MAI V        5,633,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 05 06 01 2    1483620       7502       8165       6845                 
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1947 04 04 01 2      32516       5146       5388       5234                 
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 02 02 01 2       4620       1965       2312       1156                 
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 02 02 00 1       6365       1733       2032       1632                 
50434326050000030 LINDSAY CHARLES J & LINDSAY FERN M       2,395,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1970   3883    2445450 
50434326050001180 KELLER FRED TR        1,942,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1180 0400 CONDO 1970   3218    1942500 
50434326050001200 KUDMAN IRWIN        263,865.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1139250 
50434326050001210 LEED PAULA        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     912450 
50434326050001220 LEED PAULA B        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     912450 
50434326050002180 KITTREDGE EDWARD        1,163,564.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1970   3216    1916250 
50434326050002200 SILBERSTEIN RUTH        1,149,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1149250 
50434326050002210 THOMAS MARION S TRUST        917,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     917450 
50434326050002220 FIORITA VAL & MALINDA        917,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     917450 
50434326050003010 NECO LUIS M & F RUTH NECO F RUTH       147,401.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624     937650 
50434326050003020 FITERMAN DE LORIS J        1,050,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1050000 
50434326050003030 FRIEDMAN RAYMOND WINTHROP HOUSE C/O       311,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1970   2375    1352400 
50434326050003040 GINN FLORENCE L        686,914.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1025850 
50434326050003050 HERRICK L ALLAN &        1,093,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1970   1669    1093050 
50434326050003060 MILLER STEPHEN C & MILLER BARBARA G       193,345.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1054200 
50434326050003070 CARDO RANDY & CARDO BEVERLY       1,054,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1054200 
50434326050003080 STRAUSS CAROL K & STRAUSS PETER       1,346,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1346100 
50434326050003090 FIG TREE II PARTNERS CHARLES RYAN HICKMAN C/O       2,507,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2507400 
50434326050003100 MARCANTONIO MARY M        1,504,270.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1660050 
50434326050003110 BLONDER DOROTHY ALTSCHUL KAREN B TR       326,292.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1970   2137    1377600 
50434326050003120 PAGE MICHAEL F &        654,199.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2202900 
50434326050003140 GARVEY JOHN K TRUST GARVEY JOHN K TRUSTEE       1,660,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1660050 
50434326050003150 THREE 15 WORTH INC J KERZNER C/O       1,377,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1970   2137    1377600 
50434326050003160 MANNING JOHN P        1,842,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1842750 
50434326050003170 EPSTEIN ROBERT TR & STEDMAN BARBARA S TR       1,397,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1397550 
50434326050003180 DAVID E MORGAN INC        1,058,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3180 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1058400 
50434326050003190 SCHOENFELD LORI &        1,058,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3190 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1058400 
50434326050003200 JONES DAVID L &        158,435.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1159250 
50434326050003210 ONEIL ALTON J        345,971.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3210 0400 CONDO 1970   3159    1659000 
50434326050004010 BENDERMAN MAYA        529,607.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624     942650 
50434326050004020 VIGILANTE ANTOINETTE &        140,784.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1065000 
50434326050004030 ROTTMAN JOY ANN & MILTON & JOY ANN ROTTMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       425,323.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1452150 
50434326050004040 GAYNIN JONATHAN S        1,040,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1040850 
50434326050004050 INDUSTRIAL AMERICA INC  MICHAEL F PAGE C/O       1,452,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1452150 
50434326050004060 KARTIGANER NORMAN & PATRICIA KARTIGANER PATRICIA       197,759.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1069200 
50434326050004070 SCHWARTZ MILTON        1,069,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1069200 
50434326050004080 PAGE MICHAEL F & JOAN R        1,366,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1366100 
50434326050004090 ADAMS PHYLLIS S EST MARK W GROTE C/O       2,532,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2532400 
50434326050004100 MOSS BERENICE & MOSS MAGGI &       381,524.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1685050 
50434326050004110 CHANDLER JOSEPH        232,769.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004120 OMALLEY THOMAS D & OMALLEY MARY A       2,227,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2227900 
50434326050004130 CHESHIRE M BRENNAN        253,224.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004140 PAGE JOAN R V TR        1,685,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1685050 
50434326050004150 CALYPSO LLC        1,256,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004160 FISCHER CLIFFORD R & FISCHER GAIL C       1,867,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1867750 
50434326050004170 PHILPIT MARY PHILPIT JOHN R TR       355,811.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1417550 
50434326050004180 KLEEMAN CAROLA J WACHOVIA BANK-ATTN B GARCIA C/O       1,068,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1068400 
50434326050004190 MYERS BERNARD IAN & SANDRA HAN SPECIAL SERVICES DEPT C/O       1,068,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1068400 
50434326050004200 EVANS LAURA W        1,119,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1169250 
50434326050004210 CABARLE CORNELIUS & DOROTHY E CABARLE DOROTHY E       153,858.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     927450 
50434326050004220 SERETEAN SHERRY S        629,903.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     927450 
50434326050005010 STONEMAN JAMES M MORRISSEY ROBERT J       1,235,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1235850 
50434326050005020 CALDER MADELEINE J        511,143.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1080000 
50434326050005030 BURNS INGRID BURNS INGRID TR       425,091.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1462150 
50434326050005040 GENTILE FRANK A &        1,055,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1055850 
50434326050005050 MILLER HENRY & MILLER BARBARA       1,462,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1462150 
50434326050005060 STAVARIDIS FLORIDA REALTY TRUST STAVARIDIS PATRICIA A TR       1,084,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1084200 
50434326050005070 HIGGINS PATRICIA P        211,707.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1084200 
50434326050005080 QUINN DENICE D        781,878.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1386100 
50434326050005090 PAGE LUCILLE C PAGE LUCILLE C TR       2,255,140.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2557400 
50434326050005100 HIRSCH CAROLINE P        1,710,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1710050 
50434326050005110 FISHER JOHN & GOTTESMAN MERRILL F       238,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005120 MURRAY MAUREEN        2,252,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2252900 
50434326050005130 KOPLIK SALLY J TR        318,148.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005140 SONNIER JOSEPH A        1,133,116.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1710050 
50434326050005150 FIFTH AVENUE REALTY TRUST        1,266,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005160 BENEVENTO FRANK A II        297,795.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1892750 
50434326050005170 SANFORD BRUCE W & SANFORD MARILOU K       1,437,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1437550 
50434326050006010 WOOD WILLIAM B WILLIAM B WOOD TRUST       484,261.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1250850 
50434326050006020 BASS KIM DEBRA TR & BASS RICHARD C TR       1,045,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1095000 
50434326050006030 MASTERMAN EDWARD I & MASTERMAN SYDELL       1,472,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1472150 
50434326050006040 REDMON HERBERT J JR        1,070,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1070850 
50434326050006050 KAPLAN DOLORES K        1,472,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1472150 
50434326050006060 MOYNIHAN ROBERT E & KATHERINE        1,099,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1099200 
50434326050006070 COLE BARBARA H COLE BARBARA H TR       206,582.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1099200 
50434326050006080 PETROLEUM INC        1,406,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1406100 
50434326050006090 KAPLAN DOLORES K        2,582,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2582400 
50434326050006100 LYONS KAY G        1,735,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1735050 
50434326050006110 WISE ROBERT E & WISE YVONNE B       726,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006120 LAURANS SCOTT B        1,982,190.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2277900 
50434326050006130 STEELE JEAN        242,334.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006140 GRUDOVICH THOMAS & GRUDOVICH LINDA J       1,735,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1735050 
50434326050006150 PRUDDEN HORTON JR        1,276,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006160 GRUDOVICH THOMAS & GRUDOVICH LINDA J       1,917,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1917750 
50434326050006170 WILNER ZELDA D        1,457,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1457550 
50434326050007010 PETROLEUM INC        1,265,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1265850 
50434326050007020 ZMIJEWSKI LEONARD &        1,110,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1110000 
50434326050007030 DE BORCHGRAVE A & ALEXANDRA V        1,482,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1482150 
50434326050007040 CASTELO JOSEPH & CASTELO DONNA       1,853,650.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1970   3078    1903650 
50434326050007050 MURDOCK PATRICIA K        425,591.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1970   3078    1903650 
50434326050007070 FLUSFEDER JOSEPH        1,114,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1114200 
50434326050007080 VICTORIA DE LILLE INC        1,426,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1426100 
50434326050007090 SLATER SHIRLEY        2,306,640.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2607400 
50434326050007100 GLAZER CAROL J TRUST OF 1998 & GLAZER CAROL J TR       2,988,300.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1970   3595    2988300 
50434326050007110 KARLYN WILLIAM M & KARLYN ELIZABETH M       1,286,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1286850 
50434326050007130 ANDERSON DALE        1,240,543.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7130 0400 CONDO 1970   3180    2053800 
50434326050007140 GABELLI MARIO        1,760,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1760050 
50434326050007150 DOCTER ALAN K DOCTER MARCIA       1,286,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1286850 
50434326050007160 GABELLI MARIO & PITARO REGINA       1,942,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1942750 
50434326050007170 FRIEDHEIM EDITH H WINTHROP HOUSE C/O       1,477,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1477550 
50434326050007180 COYLE MARILYN & KAZEMINEY NASSER       1,298,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7180 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1298850 
50434326050007190 SELECMAN BARBARA A BARBARA A SELECMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       483,837.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7190 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1144500 
50434326050007200 STANVALE PROP LTD LEON UNTERHALTER ASSOCS C/O       1,504,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7200 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1504650 
50434326050007210 BRONSTIEN EDWARD L JR        1,120,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7210 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1120350 
50434326050007220 DOZOR SHIRLEY W DOZOR SHIRLEY W TR       406,873.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7220 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1504650 
50434326050007230 JANSSEN EILEEN F REVOCABLE TRUST JANSSEN EILEEN F TRUSTEE       1,148,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7230 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1148700 
50434326050007240 WELLS RICHARD E & GLORIA D        1,148,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7240 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1148700 
50434326050007260 SHARF JEAN S TR & LEON UNTERHALTER ASSOCS C/O       3,033,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7260 0400 CONDO 1970   3730    3033450 
50434326050007270 MCCREADY RICHARD E        1,220,109.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7270 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1817550 
50434326050007280 FRIEDLAND MELVIN        1,309,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7280 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1309350 
50434326050007290 WARSHAW HOWARD & MIRIAM        2,412,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7290 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2412900 
50434326050007310 CORNSTEIN SHEILA        1,817,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7310 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1817550 
50434326050007320 FRANKS STANLEY & FRANKS CHRISTINE A       684,749.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7320 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1309350 
50434326050007330 DE BARDELEBEN PRINCE JR & ANNE        2,000,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7330 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    2000250 
50434326050007340 BLOYS DAVID & BLOYS SENIE       1,444,530.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7340 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1523550 
50434326060091010 KERTESS HANS W        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091020 CAROLAN RICHARD F 2001 TRUST        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091030 KAMPEL DANIEL S & KAMPEL LAURA G       1,568,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1568700 
50434326060091040 CASEY IRENE D        268,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091050 WILLIAMSON G T & PATRICIA J        1,438,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091060 BLAIR CLAUDE M & ROSE V BLAIR ROSE V       253,436.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091070 OBSER HERIBERT &        1,438,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091080 REHNERT BERNADETTE T        1,568,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1568700 
50434326060091090 LUCCHETTI RAYMOND        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091100 HIMMELSTEIN MARC & AYCOCK PAMELA       1,084,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060092010 WALDIN ERIK        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 201N 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092020 KREINDLER ELLEN C        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 202N 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092030 BLOMEYER STEPHANIE S        1,531,113.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2195550 
50434326060092050 SOUTH OCEAN LLC        2,195,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2195550 
50434326060092070 AWL LLC        1,573,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1573950 
50434326060092080 S & S LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HERBERT J STERN C/O       1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092090 LICKLE GARRISON D        290,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092100 FRANKENHOFF JILL H        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092110 GIBBONS MICHAEL J ESTEE LAUDER CO C/O       931,159.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092120 KEAN JOHN C        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092130 L ESPERANCE FAMILY CORP        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2130 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092140 FERRARA RALPH C & FERRARA BARBARA N       1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092150 WALDIN ERIK        1,418,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092160 RAIMONDO ROBERT C        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092170 KLEINBERG DAVID        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092180 SULLIVAN KEVIN C        1,523,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1573950 
50434326060092190 HERBERT J GERALD SR FAM TRUST # V        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2190 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092200 NORDBACK CLARE A DONALD SCOTT C/O       417,486.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092210 HILL EDWARD R & MARSHA E        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092220 LADD ROBERT T & LADD GEORGIANA B       1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092230 BURRUS PETER M & BURRUS ELIZABETH T       1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2230 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092240 WRIGHT RICHARD        1,169,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2240 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1219050 
50434326060094010 PRICE GORDON W & PRICE BARBARA       1,239,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1239050 
50434326060094020 GILBANE SARAH B GILBANE ROBERT V       812,326.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094030 GARDINER NANCY T        812,326.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094040 PRAY NATALIE THOMAS        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094050 KORNEGAY BRYAN B JR & KORNEGAY CORISA C       1,178,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094060 GALLO DENNIS        606,262.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094070 BAIRD ELIZABETH G        1,593,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1593950 
50434326060094080 BEASLEY JANE        1,005,887.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094090 RICCOBENE MARY MELLON BANK NA TR &       1,005,887.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094100 MCDONOUGH RICOBENE MARY TRUST MCCUSKER FRANCIS C TR       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094110 FREE JAMES C & FREE ANN TODD       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094120 DODGE JOHN B        1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094130 BROUGHER NANCY M & BROUGHER W DALE       2,533,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2633400 
50434326060094150 400 S OCEAN II LLC & 400 S OCEAN I LLC       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094160 400 S OCEAN II LLC & 400 S OCEAN I LLC       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 416E 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094170 MARROCCO ANTHONY TR        1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094180 GAMMINO ELIZABETH K GAMMINO ELIZABETH K TR       1,593,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1593950 
50434326060094190 JONES JANIS        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094200 SWEET ROBERT H EST        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094210 ROE RANDALL B        632,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1965   1095     632100 
50434326060094220 LEAMER LAURENCE & VESNA VESNA LEAMER       210,337.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094230 HANSEN JULIA S        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4230 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094240 DEANGELIS MARJORIE        1,239,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4240 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1239050 
50434326060095010 HOULIHAN JAMES G & MARY M HOULIHAN TRS       1,982,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1965   1940    1982400 
50434326060095020 POLLARD CORNELIA B        773,945.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1965   2156    2087400 
50434326060095030 PBI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ALAN MENKES C/O       2,634,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1965   2376    2634450 
50434326060095040 TOSI DYANNE C        893,259.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1965   2749    2937900 
50434326060095060 SWAN DENISE G        1,525,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1965   2376    2655450 
50434326070001010 WINN GAIL A        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1973   1590     571200 
50434326070001020 RUPERT JAIME A        352,347.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1973   1275     466200 
50434326070002010 KRISHNAN SANKAR & KRISHNAN SUSAN       487,622.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     643650 
50434326070002020 WIKSTROM SIEGLINDE        559,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002030 VANBUREN CYNTHIA        212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002040 SAVINA WILLIAM SAVINA VIRGINIA       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002050 MAHLER WOLF PETER MAHLER WOLF PETER TR       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     643650 
50434326070003010 ALLEN NORMA W        199,375.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003020 DEMPSEY PATRICIA C        212,462.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003030 ANGELINI PATRICIA A        569,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003040 DAY DAVID J        519,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003050 RIKER HARLAND A & RIKER ANN M       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     653650 
50434326080000021 KRAMER CHARLOTTE R TR HALLE BLDG C/O       3,613,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3613050 
50434326080000022 BENENSON GLADYS        3,438,110.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3556350 
50434326080000023 STRAUSS HAROLD E & STRAUSS MARLENE       2,638,108.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3556350 
50434326080000024 MORRISSEY JAMES F & KAY M KAY M MORRISSEY       1,582,880.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3613050 
50434326080000031 COLLINS KEVIN J SHEEHAN ROBERT W TR       1,968,016.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3813050 
50434326080000032 ASHTON HARRIS & ASHTON ANGELA       2,862,118.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3756350 
50434326080000033 SPRING CORP TRANSOCEANIC CORP C/O       3,756,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3756350 
50434326080000034 DUNGAN RAYMOND E & LEO SADE & DAVID HORNSTEIN       3,813,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3813050 
50434326080000041 NIELSEN BARBARA H        3,810,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4013050 
50434326080000042 POLOZKER BRUCE W POLOZKER BRUCE W TR       2,404,309.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3956350 
50434326080000043 OURISMAN MARY M        3,086,126.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3956350 
50434326080000044 MANNING JAMES P MANNING JAMES P TR       3,810,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4013050 
50434326080000051 DOCTER ALAN K & DOCTER MARCIA       2,696,488.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4213050 
50434326080000052 AMAR LEON & CHARLOTTE D IGOE-AMAR H/W       1,260,329.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4156350 
50434326080000053 MANDEL JOSEPH C MANDEL MORTON L TR       2,273,715.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4156350 
50434326080000054 BUCKLEY CAROLYN E        4,027,835.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4213050 
50434326080000061 YOUNG MARGARET TRUSTEE        1,332,401.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4413050 
50434326080000062 GERSHWIND MARJORIE        4,356,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4356350 
50434326080000063 BON DURANT ISABELLE H ISABELL H BON DURANT TR TITL       1,331,901.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4356350 
50434326080000064 KRAUS VALERIE        4,413,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4413050 
50434326090000010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       266,149.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974    847     266149 
50434326090000020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       257,192.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974    824     257192 
50434326090001010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090001020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090001030 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090001040 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090002010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090002020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090002030 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090002040 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326100001010 DUNLAP NANCY S        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     571200 
50434326100001020 HEFFERNAN PAUL M & ROBERT, FINNEGAN  AND LYNCH C/O       1,038,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1038450 
50434326100001030 CARPENTER ROSEMARY G        1,017,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1017450 
50434326100001040 MAKLER BARRY M &        118,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1975    827     442050 
50434326100001050 INGLIS JAMES D        442,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1975    827     442050 
50434326100001060 CURRY BERNARD F        149,588.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     716100 
50434326100001070 MCCARTIN LAWRENCE M TR        695,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     695100 
50434326100001080 INFANTE CAROLYN M        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     571200 
50434326100002010 HIGGINS EDWARD T & HIGGINS KATHLEEN M       623,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     623700 
50434326100002020 SALTY AIR PROPERTIES INC GC CONSULTANTS INC C/O       1,143,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1143450 
50434326100002030 BLUNDIN WILLIAM B        670,189.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1122450 
50434326100002040 HATCH JAMES A & FRANCES N        644,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     644700 
50434326100002050 DIAZ MARIA A R        644,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     644700 
50434326100002060 THREE 50 HLDG INC ROYAL BK CANADA/L GENGE C/O       768,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     768600 
50434326100002070 FIRST PALM BEACH PROP INC        747,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     747600 
50434326100002080 KRANICH MICHAEL M SR        573,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     623700 
50434326100003010 ONEGLIA A GEORGE TR & TR DEPT, DAVID ONEGLIA TR C/O       648,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     648700 
50434326100003020 MARSCHEL GLENN W & MARSCHEL KAY E       1,193,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1193450 
50434326100003030 MORMORIS STEPHEN C        751,431.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1172450 
50434326100003040 SIEDLIK LAWRENCE E        336,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     669700 
50434326100003050 GROSS LOUIS II & PHYLLIS M GROSS PHYLLIS M       197,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     669700 
50434326100003060 ENGLERT PETER & ENGLERT NORMA       793,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     793600 
50434326100003070 PALM BEACH BUILDING SERVICES INC        772,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     772600 
50434326100003080 AMERICAN NATL BK & TRUST CO TR        648,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     648700 
50434326110000011 ALBRECHT PRISCILLA        486,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0011 0400 CONDO 1976   1189     536000 
50434326110000021 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        403,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0021 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000022 BENVENISTE EVANGELINE        581,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0022 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000023 BOWES WENDY L        403,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0023 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000024 SALERNO JEAN SALERNO JEAN TR       507,760.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0024 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000031 STEPHAN CAROLINA IZQUIERDO        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0031 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000032 DONNELLY PENELOPE E        225,058.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0032 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000033 GEORGITSIS IRO        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0033 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000034 GOFMAN ALEX &        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0034 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000041 VANDYCK LINDA A        145,445.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0041 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000042 ZOVKO MARY A & JAAP W HILBRAND       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0042 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000043 DESIMONE DANIEL P & STENBERG ALAN R       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0043 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000044 VAN DER HEIDE DOUGLAS & VAN DER HEIDE RUTH       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0044 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000051 HONEYSUCKLE HILL INVESTMENT CO        641,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0051 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000052 LEELANAU LAND LLC        641,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0052 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000053 WOOD PATRICIA M        570,060.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0053 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000054 JANSSEN EILEEN F        570,060.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0054 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000061 MERRIEN JEANNINE P MERRIEN FRANCOISE TR       340,895.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0061 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000062 KLINGER BARBARA J KLINGER BARBARA J TR       228,156.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0062 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000063 PETRY ANNE C & PETRY PAUL E       590,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0063 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000064 KESSELMAN MARK L & DE ANDRADE KESSELMAN E       661,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0064 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000071 WREN WINSTON D & WREN ALLISON K       326,648.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0071 0400 CONDO 1976   1403     913000 
50434326110000072 GUSMAN IRWIN J        783,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0072 0400 CONDO 1976   1360     833000 
50434326120000010 TOSI LAURENCE A III        229,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1976    618     229950 
50434326120000020 ABIUSO CHERYL        51,490.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1976    559     174300 
50434326120000030 SALERNO ROBERT M        225,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1976    604     225750 
50434326120000040 BAER NANCY        178,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1976    604     178500 
50434326120000050 MOESER RICHARD M        299,650.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1976   1044     349650 
50434326120000071 KAPPLER CHARLES E        274,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0071 0400 CONDO 1976    827     274050 
50434326120000090 HURLEY ARTHUR J JR & MARYBETH        270,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1976    930     270900 
50434326120000100 BECK SUZANNE        136,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1976    398     136500 
50434326120000110 CALARESO DONALD A & JUDITH A        164,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1976    461     164850 
50434326120000120 DIETZ HUGH T        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1976    357     120750 
50434326120000141 STOLL SUZANNE        274,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0141 0400 CONDO 1976    827     274050 
50434326120000160 SCHAEFER JOSEPH W & SCHAEFER SHAYNA YEERA &       216,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1976    930     266700 
50434326120000170 VKO INC        136,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1976    398     136500 
50434326120000180 SALERNO LAURA LPR PERUVIAN REALTY TRUST       431,620.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1976   2228     522900 
50434326130000021 HIGHT NELL W WACHOVIA BANK TR       2,615,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2615550 
50434326130000022 PONTON DANIEL E        1,661,973.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2200800 
50434326130000023 BROWN SAURINE L & SAURINE BROWN TR TITL HLDR       2,361,230.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2563050 
50434326130000031 BSJ LLC        2,665,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2665550 
50434326130000032 FINK MARJORIE S        1,243,153.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2250800 
50434326130000033 EHRLICH STEPHEN R & EHRLICH MARY       2,010,665.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2613050 
50434326130000041 LONG ROBERT E & LONG KATHRYN S       2,715,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2715550 
50434326130000042 DAFER INC        2,300,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2300800 
50434326130000043 MERIN ANDREW J & MERIN KENNETH S &       902,105.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2663050 
50434326130000051 LUBOW ELINOR C LUBOW ELINOR C TR       794,881.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2765550 
50434326130000052 MANSON WILLIAM J JR TR & MANSON ANNE T  TR       2,350,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2350800 
50434326130000053 PONTE VEDRA CORP INC RABIDEAU GUY C/O       2,713,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2713050 
50434326130000061 NICHOLSON JAMES &        2,815,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2815550 
50434326130000062 WINSTON BELLE R TR & WINSTON BELLE R TR &       966,966.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2400800 
50434326130000063 TAUBMAN JUDITH M        2,763,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2763050 
50434326140000010 LOVE GALLERY PLACE LOVE REALTY C/O       4,150,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326140000020 LOVE GALLERY PLACE LOVE REALTY C/O       2,100,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326140000030 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD        1,935,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326150001010 WEBER MARVIN & WEBER MARY ANN       787,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     837900 
50434326150001020 WILLCOX CHRISTINE L        730,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     837900 
50434326150002010 MCDONOUGH M P & MCDONOUGH FLORENCE S       571,626.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     847900 
50434326150002020 WEBSTER JOSEPH A III & WEBSTER MARY C       475,923.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     847900 
50434326150003010 HOLLIS EARL A JR        417,875.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     857900 
50434326150003020 KERESEY ANNE S        475,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     857900 
50434326160000010 SALTEX DEVELOPMENT LP        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000020 HARRIS ROY B JR        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000030 LAGORCE JOHN O II & LAGORCE DEBORAH W       488,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1982    650     488250 
50434326160000040 GREENE J VAUGHN        69,247.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1982    423     343350 
50434326160000050 JAMES DANIEL H & JAMES SYLVIA S &       790,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     790400 
50434326160000060 ARTHUR WARREN & MAI TSAO        689,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1982    937     689850 
50434326160000070 OWEN STEPHEN B & OWEN CECILIA P       785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000080 BUSH LARRY M & BUSH ARLENE       798,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1982   1181     798000 
50434326160000090 KENAN ROBERTA S        643,190.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     790400 
50434326160000100 LARUE BRIAN        435,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1982    594     485100 
50434326160000110 SMITH KIMBERLY H        501,657.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1982    661     557550 
50434326170000011 WELCH ELRIEDE J WELCH ELRIEDE J TR       115,475.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     549150 
50434326170000012 MERCK GEORGE F        539,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     539700 
50434326170000013 MILLER KEITHLEY R TR        759,618.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1985   2574     971250 
50434326170000015 BOHN PHILIP N & BOHN SUSAN B       549,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     549150 
50434326170000021 LOVEJOY FAITH F        463,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     564150 
50434326170000022 BENHAM DAVID B & BENHAM MARGARET W       554,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000023 JENKINS LEILA C        199,868.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000024 VAN INGEN ALEXANDRA        453,670.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000025 HOLTON CARLOTA H HOLTON FAMILY TR       463,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     564150 
50434326170000031 FARKAS ROBIN L & FARKAS CAROL       579,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     579150 
50434326170000032 HOLMAN CHARLES S JR        127,155.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000033 CURRIE EMMA L        468,620.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000034 REMMEL LITTLE JEAN        469,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000035 GEORGE DONNA L        579,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     579150 
50434326170000041 BARNETT VICTOR TRS ET AL CALER DONTEN LEVINE C/O       594,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     594150 
50434326170000042 SKENDER IVAN & JANE C SILVA       336,769.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000043 BELLINGBRATH DENNY R TR        584,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000044 RIEGEL LAWRENCE M &        584,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000045 GEDDES GERALD & ANNETTE        594,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     594150 
50434326170000051 LAGATTA-SHELTON FRANCES        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1984   1287     619500 
50434326170000052 SEZNA DAVIS G        610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1984   1287     610050 
50434326170000053 THOMAS RUTH M K        610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     610050 
50434326170000054 DE PASS ELIZABETH E & DE PASS DAVID V G       610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     610050 
50434326170000055 MICHEL GEORGE J JR & PAULINE M        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     619500 
50434326180001010 GUBELMANN SUSAN M        350,976.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1985   1260     610050 
50434326180001030 COLLINS SHEILA S TR        326,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1987    620     326550 
50434326180001040 GIBBONS VERA        330,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1987    640     330750 
50434326180002010 HOWAR JOYCE L HOWAR JOYCE L TR       861,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1987   1401     929250 
50434326180002020 SAVINA LINDA M        203,729.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1987   1143     592200 
50434326180011010 COLLINS SHEILA S        454,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1987    774     454650 
50434326180011020 COLLINS SHEILA S        337,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1987    661     337050 
50434326180011030 COLLINS SHEILA S        306,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1987    479     306600 
50434326180011040 GIBBONS JOHN D JR        306,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1987    479     306600 
50434326190000010 CPG BRAZILIAN        560,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 1 0400 CONDO 1989    797     560700 
50434326190000020 PRICE DONALD B JR &        429,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    672     429450 
50434326190000030 LOOKABAUGH CINDY K        158,506.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 3 0400 CONDO 1989    991     572250 
50434326190000040 BANNISTER DAVID G & BANNISTER DEBRA B       561,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 4 0400 CONDO 1989   1064     611100 
50434326190000050 HICKS ERIC & HICKS JULIE       510,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    854     510300 
50434326210000010 SCALA LOUIS C        298,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 1 0400 CONDO 1950    541     298000 
50434326210000020 SCALA LOUIS C        217,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 2 0400 CONDO 1950    378     217000 
50434326210000030 MILLER BARRY A        155,523.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 3 0400 CONDO 1950    378     217000 
50434326210000040 INGA HIILIVIRTA REVOCABLE TR        456,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1950    903     456000 
50434326210000050 CRETELLA ELEANOR        318,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1950    698     368000 
50434326210000060 PALMHEART INC        578,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 6 0400 CONDO 1950    980     578000 
50434327010000510 BROWN PETER D & NANCY I BROWN NANCY I       3,496,109.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 05 06 01 2    2240799       7279       8132       6492                 
50434327010000521 GRUBMAN JUDITH M        3,946,688.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 04 03 01 2     766149       5004       5772       4449                 
50434327010000522 DROSDICK JOHN G &        5,330,260.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1995 04 05 00 2     532262       4622       5028       4165                 
50434327010000530 BALCOM LUCILLE P BALCOM LUCILLE P TR       4,570,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 05 04 01 1      20580       5218       6135       4083                 
50434327010000541 BAXTER LAURA        1,782,263.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 2      18532       4681       4870       4346                 
50434327010000550 CALLAHAN LEONORA A CALLAHAN LEONORA A TR       4,840,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1998 05 07 01 2    2044905       6765       7686       6203                 
50434327010000570 MILLNER VIRGINIA W ASSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION C/0       6,931,223.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1990 05 06 01 2    1546504       7781       8665       6800                 
50434327010000580 DODGE LORE H & LISE G MORAN       5,295,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 2      19901       5027       5547       4555                 
50434327010000591 RUMBOUGH STANLEY M & JANNE H JANNE H RUMBOUGH       4,074,546.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 05 06 01 2    2043456       6858       7578       6344                 
50434327010000601 CIOMEK ZDZISLAW & RADTKE JANINA       5,097,950.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327010000611 WEAN ADELAIDE M WEAN ADELAIDE M TR       9,269,970.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 04 05 00 2      21143       5310       5740       4888                 
50434327010000621 MATTEI JAMES E MATTEI JAMES E TR       9,904,650.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 04 04 02     2296495       7152       7814       6630                 
50434327010000631 BAXTER HAROLD AYCO CO. PERS ACCTG C/O       10,735,403.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1997 04 05 01 1    2132104       5983       6291       5494                 
50434327010000641 COLEMAN DENIS P & ANNABELLE G ANNABELLE G COLEMAN       4,811,229.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 06 00 1    2136179       8303       9418       7400                 
50434327010000661 ISLAND REALTY        8,198,532.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 05 04 01 2     250495       4379       4824       3874                 
50434327010000670 FISHER BARBARA M & FISHER A J III       3,243,342.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327010000690 HARRINGTON RICHARD L        2,184,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 03 04 01 1      18058       4238       4610       3469                 
50434327010000701 674 ISLAND DR LLC        3,011,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 04 04 01 2    1128950       5704       6138       4662                 
50434327010000702 BURKHEAD J GARY & J GARY BURKHEAD ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       4,112,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1995 04 05 01 1.5     962149       7891       8783       6744                 
50434327010000800 PREMIER HOLDING GROUP LLC        9,326,931.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327020000710 ROTHFELD ERIC &        12,693,724.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 08 01 2    2480450       9836      10933       8809                 
50434327020000731 MCIVER BRIAN MCIVER PAMELA       4,796,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 04 05 00 2    2085624       7032       7299       6603                 
50434327020000740 PATTERSON JAMES B PEYSER & ALEXANDER C/O       5,713,764.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1995 05 05 01 2    1992110       9049      10996       7966                 
50434327020000751 ALJ LLC        12,085,543.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1974 03 04 01 2      21075       5129       5819       4307                 
50434327020000761 TEAGLE JAYNE W FRED SHAPSS C/O       6,284,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 00 01 00 1       5083        659        810        594                 
50434327020000761 TEAGLE JAYNE W FRED SHAPSS C/O       6,284,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 03 03 01 1      23748       4121       4618       3464                 
50434327020000781 BARRETT DIANA        12,528,529.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1995 04 04 01 2      32010       4916       5583       4270                 
50434327020000791 COLLIN CHERYL E        12,102,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 04 01 1      49256       5460       5719       5035                 
50434327020000821 GUBELMANN WILLIAM GUBELMANN WILLIAM TR       7,338,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 02 2    2592732       7728       9452       6545                 
50434327020000830 AMES STEVEN        13,082,285.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327020000841 BEALL KENNETH S JR        2,089,695.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 05 07 01 1     292794       6527       7542       5325                 
50434327020000851 JOHNSON RICHARD S & PATSY S JOHNSON PATSY S       2,723,932.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 05 04 01 1     882994       5107       5403       4651                 
50434327020000880 CARPENTER E N II & CARROLL M        8,160,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 04 01 1      17796       4594       5022       4159                 
50434327020000890 HAGGIN JOHN B JR        2,806,603.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1956 04 05 01 2      25439       6170       7448       5123                 
50434327020000900 KAZEMINY NASSER & KAZEMINY YVONNE P       7,084,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1995 05 05 00 2      79641       8239       8801       7175                 
50434327030000251 ABC RENT A CAR LTD        5,600,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327030000252 ABC RENT A CAR LTD        9,783,201.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1990 04 04 01 1    1657438       6961       7411       6014                 
50434327030000270 HENNESSY EDWARD L JR & RUTH S HENNESSY RUTH S       2,671,160.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1990 05 06 01 2    1393384       7005       7228       6526                 
50434327030000280 DWARES BONNIE DWARES BONNIE TR       5,859,009.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 05 07 01 2      30160       7006       8380       6394                 
50434327030000291 REMINGTON KAMILA        2,001,450.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 05 01 2      23941       5880       7474       4290                 
50434327030000310 RAKOLTA TERRY L ROSEN MARVIN S TR TITL HLDR LAND TST       12,069,435.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 02 2    3945907       8360      10159       7239                 
50434327030000320 HICKOX CHARLES C        4,467,632.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 05 01 1      22264       5419       5712       5103                 
50434327030000340 CORRIGAN HAROLD F & CORRIGAN LORRAINE       4,818,045.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 2001 05 04 00 2    1087991       7640       8674       6874                 
50434327030000350 CUDLIP MARY BRITTAIN B        5,001,820.00 0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 05 06 01 2     104287       8106       8361       7368                 
50434327030000361 KEAN IAN M        3,755,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 01 01 00 1       3149        754        776        744                 
50434327030000361 KEAN IAN M        3,755,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 04 01 2      17571       4534       4963       3993                 
50434327030000372 RINKER RUBY S TR        8,129,787.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 04 01 2      18895       4597       5325       3817                 
50434327030000400 BARBARA FRED HUMBERT LISA       4,497,711.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 08 00 2    1831810       6837       8148       6314                 
50434327030000410 ASCHE F B JR & SARAH P TRUST ASCHE FREDERIC B JR TR       7,652,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1975 05 07 00 1      55105       5934       6163       5465                 
50434327030000420 LICKLE RENEE K & LICKLE WILLIAM C       2,891,131.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 04 05 01 2    1181304       7133       7522       6698                 
50434327030000430 575 ISLAND DRIVE TRUST ZISKA MAURA TR       7,587,125.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327030000440 FISHER-GROW CHRISTINE CHRISTINE FISHER-GROW TR TITL HLDR       4,512,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1990 05 04 00 2     787064       6897       7589       6244                 
50434327030000450 STARK JOHN &        8,663,648.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1985 05 07 01 2    1093417       8469      10021       7683                 
50434327030000460 POLLACK EDWARD & DEBORAH DEBORAH POLLACK       1,891,153.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1985 04 05 00 2      18991       4674       5565       4503                 
50434327030000470 KNUDSEN JUDITH F        3,307,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 00 00 1    1224107       5517       6048       4924                 
50434327030000481 JOHNSON MARGARET A & JOHNSON THOMAS S       6,480,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 04 05 01 2    1719534       7454       8811       6655                 
50434327030000482 BERLEY PETER & BERLEY LINDA K       6,674,767.00 0.4626 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 07 00 2    2600138       7548       8744       6599                 
50434327040000010 ISLAND ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        7,526,141.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 05 01 2     245041       6406       6658       6028                 
50434327040000010 ISLAND ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        7,526,141.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 03 03 00 2      65660       2270       2270       2270                 
50434327040000031 HUFTY FRANCES A HUFTY FRANCES A TR       2,728,352.00 0.5386 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 05 01 2     621017       6383       6562       6010                 
50434327040000051 HUFTY PAGE LEE & BELL THEODORE A III       3,885,806.00 0.5055 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 05 04 01 1     392663       4470       4508       4454                 
50434327040000061 SMITH JANE W &        2,248,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 05 06 01 2     206262       6333       6903       5757                 
50434327040000072 VIOLET HILL DEV CO LTD        6,006,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327040000090 FALK MICHAEL & FALK ANNIE       5,605,614.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 05 01 2    3184321       9259      10718       8263                 
50434327040000101 VIOLET HILL DEV CO        8,884,836.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 06 01 2    2421781       8095       9908       7166                 
50434327050000012 101 EL BRAVO LLC        12,316,500.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327050000020 TROPIN KENNETH G & TROPIN KATHLEEN O       18,445,897.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 2001 07 09 04 2    6251125      11736      14318      10843                 
50434327050000040 4 EL BRAVO TRUST & BROBERG PETER S TR       5,956,275.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 05 06 01 3.5    1666718      10657      11072      10496                 
50434327050000040 4 EL BRAVO TRUST & BROBERG PETER S TR       5,956,275.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 01 01 00 2     127554       1568       2200        825                 
50434327050000060 KOCH RONALD B & KOCH PAULETTE W       5,270,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1973 05 06 01 1    1138207       7492       8171       6445                 
50434327050000191 VAN WAVEREN JEAN M VAN WAVEREN JEAN M TR       3,193,917.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 05 08 01 2     190774       9217      10495       8359                 
50434327050000192 KARAKUL KENN BROBERG PETER S TR       5,264,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1984 04 05 01 2     847985       5253       5532       4668                 
50434327050000192 KARAKUL KENN BROBERG PETER S TR       5,264,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 1      85913        792        792        792                 
50434327050000200 OCEANIC PLACE PROPERTIES LLC KENNETH WANG C/O       15,290,994.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 09 01 2    2201413      10536      11654       9706                 
50434327050000220 TAYLOR MARGARETTA D MARENTETTE C/O       7,486,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 10 01 3    2845581      11824      12606      11160                 
50434327050000230 MASHEK CHANDLER C        5,346,311.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 08 01 2    4833995       9482      12090       8183                 
50434327050000240 GORDON DONALD &        9,897,545.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 01 01 00 2      90584       1347       1585        793                 
50434327050000240 GORDON DONALD &        9,897,545.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 00 06 02 2    5179148       8697      11072       7864                 
50434327050000380 TOLL WILLIAM M        9,296,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 05 09 00 2     262967      10737      12321       9690                 
50434327060000070 CUMMINGS PETER D & CUMMINGS JULIE F       4,793,788.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1980 05 08 00 2    1874719       7549       7884       6832                 
50434327060000081 SUMMERS GEORGE E        2,477,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 04 05 01 2    1883274       6995       7366       6113                 
50434327060000090 FAILING BRUCE & FAILING LEIGH       3,497,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 05 01 2    1048639       7611       8547       6592                 
50434327060000100 VLAHOS DEAN &        4,063,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1996 01 01 00 1      29371        295        421          1                 
50434327060000100 VLAHOS DEAN &        4,063,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1996 04 05 01 2    1124093       6206       7524       5788                 
50434327060000110 WOODWARD ORATOR E 251 EL BRAVO TRUST       1,647,338.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 04 05 01 2    1145940       5750       6087       4727                 
50434327060000120 MILLER ALAN H & MILLER HARRIET L       7,997,212.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 06 01 2    6039178      11052      13837       9510                 
50434327060000131 FIVERSON NANCY        10,458,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 02 02 00 1      89822       1140       1205        989                 
50434327060000131 FIVERSON NANCY        10,458,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 06 00 1     543057       6336       7181       5717                 
50434327060000150 BOVE MICHAEL J III BOVE PAMELA A       1,356,044.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 02 02 00 2      83006       1224       1440        720                 
50434327060000150 BOVE MICHAEL J III BOVE PAMELA A       1,356,044.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 03 05 01 2     811043       6189       6478       5798                 
50434327060000160 MOORE DUDLEY L JR & MOORE MARGARET B       10,456,746.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 08 09 02 2.5    6644864      14461      18095      12799                 
50434327060000180 PROSSER JEFFREY PROSSER DAWN       7,591,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1995 05 08 01 3    4111164      10842      12357       9958                 
50434327060000251 QUICK PATRICIA        4,829,335.00 0.4557 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 05 01 2    2958908       6884       7800       5995                 
50434327060000252 MORGAN MITCHELL & HILARIE L TRUSTEE MORGAN HILARIE L TRUSTEE       14,366,084.00 0.9939 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 05 06 01 3    2248845      13535      14756      12669                 
50434327060000270 GAY DEBORAH H        6,126,443.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 06 01 2    2639692       7005       7738       6188                 
50434327060000280 KARP JAMES S & KARP IRENE J       5,413,751.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 07 01 2    2882146       8408       9490       7766                 
50434327060000290 WETHERELL DAVID        4,826,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1932 02 02 00 2     124673       2732       3232       1564                 
50434327060000290 WETHERELL DAVID        4,826,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 06 00 2    1213808       5031       5449       4856                 
50434327060000321 CUNNINGHAM JOHN F & ELLEN M CUNNINGHAM ELLEN M       3,885,901.00 0.68 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 05 01 2    1675737       8109       9925       7328                 
50434327060000330 ROSINSKY CLAUDE        2,098,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 01 01 00 2     108600       1275       1500        750                 
50434327060000330 ROSINSKY CLAUDE        2,098,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 05 06 01 2    1535742       5417       5513       5273                 
50434327060000341 SHIELDS MAURY F & SHIELDS J V JR       4,953,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 01 01 00 2     527070       1996       2496       1713                 
50434327060000341 SHIELDS MAURY F & SHIELDS J V JR       4,953,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 04 04 01 2    2378086       4428       5461       4140                 
50434327060000350 MURRAY TERRENCE & TERRENCE MURRAY TR TITL HLDR       3,808,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 04 05 01 2    1410961       5870       6657       4993                 
50434327060000361 MAHONEY DANIEL J III MAHONEY SUZANNE       2,379,150.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1960 04 05 01 2    1116250       6248       6575       6125                 
50434327060000361 MAHONEY DANIEL J III MAHONEY SUZANNE       2,379,150.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1961 01 01 00 2     102234       1904       2240       1120                 
50434327060000371 CONDRON CHRISTOPHER M & CONDRON MARGARET M       5,484,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1993 01 01 00 2      87812        953       1372        536                 
50434327060000371 CONDRON CHRISTOPHER M & CONDRON MARGARET M       5,484,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1993 04 05 01 2    1929099       6046       6369       5907                 
50434327060000381 COLLIER BARRON G II TR        4,596,971.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 04 05 01 2    1120310       6956       7446       5930                 
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 05 07 01 2    1201050       9510      11441       8004                 
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 01 01 00 1     102505       1122       1122       1122                 
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 03 00 1     179025       1660       1660       1660                 
50434327060000410 MORGAN MITCHELL & HILARIE L TRUSTEE        10,000.00 0 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434327070000010 NEWQUIST SCOTT C        7,712,783.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 06 00 2    2148288      11307      12891       9472                 
50434327080000110 COWELL RICHARD C        2,345,915.00 0.7 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 08 01 2    2402408       8526       8988       7820                 
50434327080000421 ROSS WILBUR L JR        4,698,648.00 0.3647 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1980 05 06 01 2     925331       6810       7116       5719                 
50434327080000422 DOCTOR DANIEL W & DOCTOR JUDITH E       4,266,365.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1995 04 04 01 2    1281897       5278       5685       4951                 
50434327080000440 ROSS WILBUR L JR        9,985,675.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 05 06 00 2    2849855      11164      12727      10343                 
50434327080000450 ARASKOG RAND V ARASKOG JESSIE M       7,055,365.00 0.8647 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1999 10 07 00 1    7032341      13511      14900      12374                 
50434327080000471 MEYER WILLIAM A & MEYER DENISE S       5,446,691.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 2001 05 07 00 2    1216906       6237       7552       5426                 
50434327080000480 MORRISON CARLOS        9,652,232.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 05 07 01 1     140318      14620      15379      14015                 
50434327080000500 WISTER DIANA S        6,298,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1975 05 07 00 2    1468149       9101       9747       8753                 
50434327080000500 WISTER DIANA S        6,298,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1959 02 02 00 1     153953       1582       1582       1582                 
50434327080000520 FARRIS CECILIA L        2,248,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1950 05 08 01 3    1643085      11749      12406      11278                 
50434327080000531 QUICK THOMAS C        4,972,736.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 05 07 01 2    1900282       9011      10428       7981                 
50434327360000010 MURRAY W STEPHEN & MURRAY MUFFIE BANCROFT       1,509,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1971   3280    1509900 
50434327360000020 EDWARDS JAMES C & EDWARDS MARGARET B       1,534,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1971   2730    1534050 
50434327360000030 PERRY MARINA R PERRY MARINA R TR TITL HLDR       311,134.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000040 PALADINO WILLIAM JR & DIANE DIANE R PALADINO       309,965.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1971   1575    1080450 
50434327360000050 SAMSON MARVIN        1,679,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1971   3507    1729350 
50434327360000060 THOMAS BYRON F & THOMAS MARY H       1,561,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1971   3447    1561350 
50434327360000070 FORTIN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC        1,080,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1971   1575    1080450 
50434327360000080 PALMIERI FRANCIS L JR        539,144.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000090 GOULD GEORGE &        1,082,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000100 LEIST ALAN R        1,111,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1971   1622    1111950 
50434327360000110 BAUMAN SUZANNE P BAUMAN SUZANNE P TR       559,319.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1971   3623    1625400 
50434327380000010 LONGENBACH BRUCE R & LONGENBACH VERONICA K       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0010 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000020 LONGENBACH BRUCE & LONGENBACH VERONICA K       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0020 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000030 WISE KATHLEEN E        299,454.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0030 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000040 TALTY BERNARD J        555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0040 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000050 ZUNG LAURA & ROBERTS NATHANIEL T       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0050 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000060 FREDERICKS DOUGLAS E        299,454.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0060 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000070 OLIVER ALBERT J JR        121,199.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0070 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000080 MARINACCIO MARILYN        555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0080 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327390001010 KOPHELM ALLEN D        380,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     380100 
50434327390001030 PICKETT JOHN O JR & PICKETT ROBIN R       518,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1963   1160     518700 
50434327390001040 LARSEN HEIKKI        131,491.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     328650 
50434327390001050 MATWICZYK PETER & MATWICZYK CAROL       347,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1963    595     347550 
50434327390002010 KOPHELM ALLEN D        383,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     383100 
50434327390002020 CALLAHAN ELEANOR K TR        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390002030 KALTHOFF ROSEMARY H        127,975.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1963    580     331650 
50434327390002040 TAMASI GUY TAMASI SABINE H       60,319.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     331650 
50434327390002050 GRINKEVICH GALINA        300,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1963    595     350550 
50434327390003010 DANIELE DONNA        386,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     386100 
50434327390003020 BREYER HENRY W III        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390003030 NESHER ROBERT A & NESHER JILL C       335,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1963    580     334650 
50434327390003040 EDELSTEIN DAVID N        334,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     334650 
50434327390003050 HESSLER DALLAS        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390004010 LAND ACQUI CORP        428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1963    830     428400 
50434327390004020 RODRIGUEZ LUGO JORGE        492,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1963   1025     492450 
50434327390004030 FELDKAMP WILLIAM P        310,655.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1963   1025     492450 
50434327430000010 ALBAN JOYCE        693,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974   1133     693000 
50434327430000020 MOONIE CLYDE W & LIANA M        1,220,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1220100 
50434327430000030 RUSSELL COLETTE L        835,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1011150 
50434327430000040 PALMER RICHARD W & PALMER SUSAN M       1,124,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1124550 
50434327430000050 LARKIN OWEN G &        846,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1021150 
50434327430000060 LOSNER SHIRLEY        1,230,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1230100 
50434327430000070 BREYER HENRY W III        846,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1021150 
50434327430000080 BULLOCK SUSANNE B &        946,010.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1134550 
50434327430000090 TALOTTA LOUIS J        1,031,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1031150 
50434327430000100 ANDERSON ANDREE G TRUST ANDERSON ANDREE G TR       1,240,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1240100 
50434327430000110 MORRIS JONATHAN H        856,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1031150 
50434327430000120 REINUS FOY Y TR        234,590.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1144550 
50434327440000010 ALBAN FAMILY TRUST ALBAN MAE JOYCE TRS       966,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0010 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1178     966000 
50434327440000020 ZACHARY COSTA & ZACHARY RUTH S       139,875.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0020 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1240     994350 
50434327440000030 LIMOLI JULE E & LIMOLI DANA L       976,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0030 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1178     976500 
50434327450002010 WARREN DONALD E & WARREN BETTY ANNE       828,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1118250 
50434327450002020 SCOTT DONALD B & SCOTT ELIZABETH M       759,042.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1978   2096     975450 
50434327450002030 ALBAN MADELEINE S TR        1,118,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1118250 
50434327450003010 PELLAR DONALD & PELLAR MARCIA       365,834.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1128250 
50434327450003020 LEHNER SYLVIA P EST        305,527.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1978   2096     985450 
50434327450003030 JOHNSTON VIVIAN S TRUSTEE JOHNSTON VIVIAN S TRUST       768,103.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1128250 
50434327460010010 BALLINGER WALTER F II BALLINGER WALTER F II TR       759,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010020 POPE WILLIAM        809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010030 BALLINGER WALTER F II TRUST WALTER F BALLINGER II TR       809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010040 DEAR RICHARD K        809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460020021 EDDY MARJORIE CIZEK REV TRUST        685,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     685650 
50434327460020022 ARNOLD JANE & ARNOLD STEPHEN H       371,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1983    782     371700 
50434327460020023 BERMAN DALE & ALLISON C ALLISON C BERMAN       141,055.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     720300 
50434327460020024 GREENE WILLIAM B CARTER COUNTRY BANK C/O       720,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     720300 
50434327460020025 YANOW JOAN C        434,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1983    782     434700 
50434327460020026 THAYER SHEILA R        448,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     685650 
50434327460020031 CLARKE DONNA H        341,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     690650 
50434327460020032 REMMERT ELIZABETH D TR        439,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1983    782     439700 
50434327460020033 JENRETTE JON S & JENRETTE MARY H       725,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     725300 
50434327460020034 JCF PARTNERSHIP NANCY J DILLEY C/O       725,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     725300 
50434327460020035 DI LORENZO DANIELA        439,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1983    782     439700 
50434327460020036 CHAPDELAINE JEAN-LOUIS & CHAPDELAINE JUDY       690,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     690650 
50434327460020041 DOWLING ROBERT S & RENWICK W CROSBY       695,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     695650 
50434327460020042 SAFYURTLU ALI        252,412.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1983    782     444700 
50434327460020043 TECHGLAD INC        730,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     730300 
50434327460020044 VAUDIN YANNA        128,894.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     730300 
50434327460020045 SMITH JOHN R        444,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1983    782     444700 
50434327460020046 LEATHERMAN S R &        695,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     695650 
50434327460020051 SEGERDAHL KATHLEEN A LEIDER GERARD TR       464,351.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     700650 
50434327460020052 SCHALLMAN MIRIAM B SCHALLMAN MIRIAM B TR       360,470.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1983    782     449700 
50434327460020053 BREYER HENRY W III        735,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     735300 
50434327460020054 FRANK JUDITH A & R A FRANK SR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC       735,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     735300 
50434327460020055 GIBBONS JOHN D        449,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1983    782     449700 
50434327460020056 RANDOLPH FRANK W RANDOLPH FRANK W TR       181,547.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     700650 
50434327460020061 BECK LAURA        612,290.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     705650 
50434327460020062 HARRIS AUDREY P HARRIS AUDREY P TR       366,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1983    782     454700 
50434327460020063 SPLAWN REBECCA L        740,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     740300 
50434327460020064 CHRISTMAN ROGER        740,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     740300 
50434327460020065 MORRIS JONATHAN H        454,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0065 0400 CONDO 1983    782     454700 
50434327460020066 PEARL FRANK H & PEARL GERYL T       705,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0066 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     705650 
50434327520000010 ANDERSON JOHN W II        1,486,164.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 02 03 00 2     300336       4699       5052       4282                 
50434327520000020 DENTON VICKIE        422,892.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 03 04 01 1.5     286417       4480       4757       4086                 
50434327520000030 BELISLE MICHAEL & GARY LINDA A       1,160,461.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1995 03 04 01 2     315474       4480       4757       4086                 
50434327520000040 MATTHEWS BETSY K MATTHEWS BETSY K TR       572,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 02 03 01 2     303147       4743       5096       4326                 
50434327530001010 MCCURRACH DOUGLAS S & MCCURRACH DANIELA M       753,855.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1982   2284    1258950 
50434327530001020 DICKSON SUSAN K        1,304,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1982   2323    1304100 
50434327530001030 GALANTUCCI ROBERT L & GALANTUCCI PATRICIA       1,088,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1982   1955    1088850 
50434327530002010 CARLSON JEAN        1,258,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1982   2284    1258950 
50434327530002020 NESHER ROBERT A & NESHER JILL C       1,254,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1982   2323    1304100 
50434327530002030 HERNANDEZ OSCAR R        708,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1982   1955    1088850 
50434327530003101 GOUGH NANCY D        1,068,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 3101 0400 CONDO 1982   3433    1730400 
50434327540000011 DAVIS TERRIE A        856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000012 BLAKE CURTIS L & BLAKE PATRICIA H       856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000013 VAN PELT JANE E VAN PELT JANE E TR       806,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000014 REISS THEODORE J        856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000021 JUDELL EILEEN W        909,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     909300 
50434327540000022 COWEN ARTHUR III &        909,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     909300 
50434327540000023 DE ARAUJO SERGIO I & SERGIO I DE ARAUJO ET AL TR HLDRS       385,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     935550 
50434327540000024 WEBB SAMUEL B JR & WEBB MARSHALL B       497,703.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     935550 
50434327540000031 STETSON JULIA T TRUST JULIA T STETSON TR       914,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     914300 
50434327540000032 UNIT 3B COCOANUT ROW LLC        914,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     914300 
50434327540000033 DOUTHIT PHILIP S &        940,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     940550 
50434327540000034 HUMPHREY MARGUERITE B        940,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     940550 
50434327540000041 GOLDSTEIN FREDERICK &        931,541.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1982   3080    1555050 
50434327540000042 MILLER EMMA G MILLER EMMA G TR       380,280.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     919300 
50434327540000043 AVERY JOHN E & AVERY CARON G       356,311.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     945550 
50434327540000051 WARNER PHILIP &        924,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     924300 
50434327540000052 MILLAS TIMI &        924,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     924300 
50434327540000053 MURPHY NORMAN E ET AL        950,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     950550 
50434327540000054 RAND GERHARD A & GERHARD RAND TR TITL HLDR       531,303.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     950550 
50434327540000061 SIRIS LINDA        465,069.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1982   1770    1153950 
50434327540000062 DUFFAR FRANCOIS & L DUFFAR & M DUFFAR & SANDRINE DUFFAR       1,153,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1982   1770    1153950 
50434327550000010 DOTOLI NANCY FRANK DOTOLI C/O       117,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1984    300     117600 
50434327550000020 DOWDLE ELIZABETH D        140,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1984    361     140700 
50434327550000030 DOWDLE ELIZABETH B        455,152.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1984   1602     585900 
50434327550000060 DOTOLI NANCY        226,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1984    601     226800 
50434327550000070 FERRARA GERALDINE        39,604.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1984    322     126000 
50434327550000080 HUBBARD LYRA L        184,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1984    481     184800 
50434327560000061 WYNER SHIRLEY M TR        309,601.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0061 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000062 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A & TAFFY A        216,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0062 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000063 PRESLES ANNICK D TR & HOCQUARD SOPHIE E TR       221,101.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0063 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000064 COLLIER BARRON G II TR        153,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0064 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001811 FRYE PROPERTIES LLC        311,101.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1811 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001812 BABYATSKY MARVIN J        196,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1812 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001821 BEACHAM HORACE E JR        337,051.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1821 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001822 MODESITT CHARLES C TR & MODESITT THELMA A TR       230,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1822 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327580000021 HUTTON WILLIAM E III & HUTTON LYNN S       300,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000022 LEHR LOUIS A JR LEHR SHERRY M       315,724.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000031 SPOTS INC        731,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000032 ANDREWS EDWIN C & PATRICIA S        731,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327620000010 DOGRAMACIYAN GARBIS        1,303,951.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000020 USHER LLC        1,167,551.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000030 MARIKO INC        1,340,301.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000040 CAJIGAS CARLOS        197,401.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0040 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000050 CAJIGAS CARLOS & CAJIGAS MICHELA PELLONI DE       416,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0050 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000060 CAJIGAS CARLOS M        542,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0060 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000070 USHER LLC        399,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0070 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327630000000 COHN JONATHAN R TRUST &        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967      0        125 
50434327630001010 MARSTON ANTHONY C        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630001020 BURWEN NORMAN        263,952.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630001030 JACK JOAN L        176,262.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630001040 JORDAN DARLENE L        300,151.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630002010 SCOTT HAROLD B SCOTT JANE R       0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630002020 MOSELEY JEAN W JEAN W MOSELEY TR HLDR       227,249.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630002030 KING ROSALIE M        139,745.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630002040 THOMAS CLAIR A & VIRGINIA W VIRGINIA W THOMAS       399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630002050 SMITH W DEAN & SMITH BARBARA K       355,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     355950 
50434327630002060 OKEEFFE CLARE OKEEFFE CLARE TR       306,675.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     363300 
50434327630002070 MASON CARLL DOROTHY EST        449,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     449400 
50434327630002080 MARTIN GRACE B        124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     476700 
50434327630003010 WILLARD LOUISE B        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630003020 KERWIN JAMES & KERWIN SHEILA       612,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630003030 REILLY ROBERT F & REILLY MARY ANNE T       467,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630003040 REED STANLEY F JR        399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630003050 MILLS EVERETTE E III        360,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     360950 
50434327630003060 HERBERT MADELINE        368,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     368300 
50434327630003070 ASHFORTH H ADAMS        459,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     459400 
50434327630003080 KILLEN JOHN T III        124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     486700 
50434327630004010 YOUNGMAN BARBARA P        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630004020 GORDON CHRISTINE E        612,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630004030 CALLAHAN EDWARD W CALLAHAN EDWARD W TR       355,609.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630004040 MACHON ELIZABETH L        300,151.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630004050 KIERNAN JAMES J JR        365,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     365950 
50434327630004060 WEBB BAXTER E & ANN C ANN C WEBB       113,398.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     373300 
50434327630004070 CARTER LOUISE C        469,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     469400 
50434327630004080 LANDAU ERMINA A        496,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     496700 
50434327630005010 ODONNELL ROBERT J & ODONNELL SUE D       323,432.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     632300 
50434327630005020 NAVIN JOAN & NAVIN JOHN       642,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     692150 
50434327630005030 STETSON JOSEPHINE D        467,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630005040 OKEEFFE ARTHUR F TRUST OKEEFFE ARTHUR F TRUSTEE       399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630005050 ATKINSON JOSEPH & KATHLEEN        370,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     370950 
50434327630005060 TONER MARJORIE        113,398.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     378300 
50434327630005070 GILLESPIE EDWARD A & GILLESPIE MARIE T       479,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     479400 
50434327630005080 LYNESS C VINCENT LYNESS MARY L       124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     506700 
50434327630006010 SEZNA DAVIS G & SEZNA BARBARA       930,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2002     980700 
50434327630006020 ATKINSON JOSEPH A & KATHLEEN C ATKINSON KATHLEEN C       396,042.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2443    1121400 
50434327630006030 FRANTZ MARK G & BENTE S FRANTZ       884,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1808     884100 
50434327630006040 BRINKMANN HILKE        864,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1817     864150 
50434327630006050 GWINN RACHEL C        321,672.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2002     928200 
50434327640000000 FOUR 55 WORTH AVE CORP        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971      0        125 
50434327640001010 FOUR 55 WORTH AVE CORP        262,500.00  COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)    1971    672     262500 
50434327640002010 HODGINS WILLIAM TRUST        385,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     385350 
50434327640002020 KIBORT CHARLES A JR & KIBORT ALICE       278,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     278250 
50434327640002030 DOERR SCOTT R & GABLE CYNTHIA A       278,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     278250 
50434327640002040 SESSA GREGG V TRUST & SESSA GREGG V TR       367,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     367500 
50434327640002050 WHITE JOCELYN        266,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     266700 
50434327640002060 HARDER ROSEMARY K        266,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     266700 
50434327640002070 VIETOR NANCY        421,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     471450 
50434327640002080 FRITZ RICHARD D & ROSEMARY S        471,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     471450 
50434327640002090 ORLANDO RENE        296,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     296100 
50434327640002100 BAIN COLLEEN M        296,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     296100 
50434327640003010 MORIARTY GERTRUDE D        400,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     400350 
50434327640003020 PATCH NATHAN G        288,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     288250 
50434327640003030 SAMMONS RICHARD F & ELLETT ANNE F       288,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     288250 
50434327640003040 EKNOIAN RICHARD T        377,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     377500 
50434327640003050 FAY CLAUDIA R & FAY RICHARD       276,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     276700 
50434327640003060 WILKINSON VIRGINIA E        276,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     276700 
50434327640003070 HELLRIGL MARIA P        251,912.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     491450 
50434327640003080 NUISSL ANNA M G HAMILTON C/O       491,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     491450 
50434327640003090 PHILLIPS BRICE R TR        473,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1532     473550 
50434327640004010 SAGE HENRY W JR        84,536.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     415350 
50434327640004020 KREUSLER JANE C        298,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     298250 
50434327640004030 WALSH MICHAEL P & KREUSLER WALSH JANE       298,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     298250 
50434327640004040 PHILLIPS BRICE R & SHIRLEY E        387,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     387500 
50434327640004050 MENGONI FRED        286,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     286700 
50434327640004060 ANDREWS EDWARD B & ANDREWS MARSHA B       286,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     286700 
50434327640004070 WATTS BRUCE R & WATTS SUSAN B       511,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     511450 
50434327640004080 HEVENER MARY B        511,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     511450 
50434327640004090 VEASY JOHN P        104,566.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     326100 
50434327640004100 WALLACH FREDERICK E & HEVENER MARY H       326,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     326100 
50434327650000000 LAKE DRIVE CO OP APTS INC        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1974      0        125 
50434327650002010 STIBOLT CARL B        223,980.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     279300 
50434327650002020 PHIPPS HUBERT G        304,320.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     361200 
50434327650002030 BUCKNER CAROLE C ET AL        232,919.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     361200 
50434327650002040 STIBOLT CARL B        358,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     358050 
50434327650002050 BOWERS JAMES R & BOWERS PATRICIA BRYANT       358,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     358050 
50434327650002060 MAJOR HOWARD B JR        102,880.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     627900 
50434327650002070 KOLLOCK MARJORIE A TRUST DONOHUE F SCOTT TR       144,741.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     712950 
50434327650002080 NYHEIM JOHN A &        279,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     279300 
50434327650003010 WALLACE JULIA        284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650003020 KIBORT CHARLES A & KIBORT ALICE       245,604.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     371200 
50434327650003030 GRAINGER ROBERT T        371,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     371200 
50434327650003040 OXNAM JAMES W        368,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     368050 
50434327650003050 RUGER CHARLES &        368,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     368050 
50434327650003060 EMANUELSON DWIGHT H &        647,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     647900 
50434327650003070 FORREST ROBERT FORREST ROBERT TRUST       244,517.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     732950 
50434327650003080 KIBORT CHARLES A & KIBORT ALICE       284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650004010 SHEERAN JAMES J        284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650004020 MILLER COURTLANDT & MILLER GINA       249,028.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     381200 
50434327650004030 SCHONBEK CHARLOTTE        667,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     667900 
50434327650004040 WILLIS F GORDON & WILLIS KATHERINE F       251,216.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     378050 
50434327650004050 PHELAN MARY C        328,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     378050 
50434327650004060 MADDEN EDWARD E        617,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     667900 
50434327650004070 FREDRICKS JOAN        170,880.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     752950 
50434327650004080 SHEERAN JAMES EST        89,036.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 408 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     289300 
50434327660000000 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1970      0        125 
50434327660000010 BRINCKERHOFF SIDNEY B TRUSTEE        417,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     417900 
50434327660000020 BRINCKERHOFF NATALIE G        287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000030 BRINCKERHOFF NATALIE G        362,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     412650 
50434327660000040 VAKOUTIS JOHN &        274,052.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     417900 
50434327660000050 SCHULER WILLAIM C & SCHULER BARBARA J       287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000060 SCHULER WILLIAM C        68,244.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     412650 
50434327660000070 PRICE KATHRYN K        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000080 PRICE HENRY A TRUST        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000090 DIFILIPPO NANDO EST        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000100 SANDERS VERONICA H        48,224.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000110 FRIZZELL ALBERT T TRUST        287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000120 CORBIN ROBERT E & CORBIN JANET G       83,235.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000140 FRIZZELL ALBERT T TRUST        371,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000150 SOUTH LAKE NOMINEE TRUST HIRSCH STEVEN N TRUSTEE       274,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     274050 
50434327660000160 MILLER EDGAR        371,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000170 TENHAVE ROBERT & TENHAVE ELIZABETH C       366,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     366450 
50434327670000000 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961      0        125 
50434327670001030 MEJIA MARGARET H & MEJIA ALBERTO       805,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1960     825300 
50434327670001040 GARCIA ELIZABETH A        648,450.00  COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 104 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     618450 
50434327670001050 REED PHYLLIS A REED PHYLLIS A TR       181,018.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     767550 
50434327670001060 LEE ROBERT E & LEE ELAINE       340,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1160     375900 
50434327670001070 CARABASI RALPH & HELEN T CARABASI HELEN T       179,720.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     534450 
50434327670001080 POHANKA JOHN J POHANKA LYNN T       525,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     525000 
50434327670002010 TESE JOYCE        999,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271     999600 
50434327670002020 SCHMIDLAPP PATRICIA K        1,140,227.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2463    1158150 
50434327670002040 WILLIAMSON DOUGLAS F JR & WILLIAMSON BARBARA T       336,503.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     653100 
50434327670002050 SCHOFIELD ROBERT H & BARBARA P        702,655.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     782550 
50434327670002060 MONTOURI WARREN KENDALL MONTOURI WARREN K TR       762,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     782550 
50434327670002070 COOK KEVIT R & COOK GAIL F       494,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     544450 
50434327670002080 KIRSTEN JOACHIM R &        485,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     535000 
50434327670003010 PORTER GRANT & PORTER CHRISTINA       1,014,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271    1014600 
50434327670003020 TOTH MICHAEL C        434,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961    988     374850 
50434327670003030 HARPER ROBERT H TRUST HARPER ROBERT H TR       666,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1475     606900 
50434327670003040 NYHEIM JOHN A        683,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     673100 
50434327670003050 GOOTRAD HAROLD & GOOTRAD ROBERTA       857,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     797550 
50434327670003060 JENKINS BENJAMIN P III & JENKINS MARIANNE W       827,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     797550 
50434327670003070 LEAHEY MARY J        369,249.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     554450 
50434327670003080 JANKOWSKY JOEL &        545,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     545000 
50434327670004010 PILKINGTON ROBERT & PILKINGTON HELEN       914,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271     914550 
50434327670004020 VINTON LOUISE        444,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961    988     384850 
50434327670004030 HICKLIN HALLIE H MORGENS L C/O       686,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1475     626900 
50434327670004040 JENNINGS JOHN L & ROBERTA B JENNINGS ROBERTA B       181,018.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     693100 
50434327670004050 PRESTON GLADYS P        872,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     812550 
50434327670004060 HARRIS CAMERON M & DOROTHY W        1,390,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   3240    1360800 
50434327670004080 MATTHEWS BETSY K &        555,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     555000 
50434327670005010 PILKINGTON ROBERT TR        1,044,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271    1044600 
50434327670005020 CURRIE L RODGER & PATRICIA CURRIE PATRICIA       104,444.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1349     562800 
50434327670005030 DARLINGTON HENRY JR        507,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1114     447300 
50434327670005040 STEERE BRUCE M        301,582.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     713100 
50434327670005050 VANBUREN ROBERT VANBUREN ROBERT TR       209,896.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     827550 
50434327670005060 BRADSHAW PATRICIA PATRICIA BRADSHAW ET AL TR HLDRS       807,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     827550 
50434327670005070 PALAMAD DEV CORP        574,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     574450 
50434327670005080 MOORE MARTHA B        126,008.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     565000 
50434327670006010 CLEARY BARBARA M & BARBARA & JAMES CLEARY ET AL TR HLDRS       979,642.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2897    1424850 
50434327670006020 EPPIG RUTH S        1,150,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1908    1090950 
50434327670006030 SETTLE W SYDNOR        972,628.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2916    1296750 
50434327670006040 FLANAGAN JOSEPH P & FLANAGAN CAROL O       451,042.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1272     675150 
50434327680000000 VILLAS INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1971      0        125 
50434327680002010 BAXTER GEORGE W SR & BAXTER GEORGE W SR TR TITL HLDR       1,508,287.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2258550 
50434327680002020 GADD SARA R        1,357,871.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1873200 
50434327680002030 KEANE MARILYN T TR        1,781,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1781850 
50434327680002040 BAGLEY ANYA S BAGLEY ANYA S TR       1,470,810.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1781850 
50434327680002050 CAY JOHN E III CAY JOHN E III TR       1,358,371.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1873200 
50434327680002060 SCHULER JOHN H & SCHULER ELIZABETH L       1,708,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2258550 
50434327680003010 DEMATTEIS NANCY        2,258,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2308550 
50434327680003020 ARMSTRONG ANDREW J ANDREW J ARMSTRONG TR TITL HLDR       1,581,520.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1923200 
50434327680003030 GREENE WILLIAM B JR        1,831,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1831850 
50434327680003040 BAIN COLLEEN        636,314.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP A03D 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1831850 
50434327680003050 MCLAUGHLIN MARCELLA K TR        1,923,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1923200 
50434327680003060 FERRIN BARBARA        817,185.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2308550 
50434327680004010 GRANT ADELE R        2,358,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2358550 
50434327680004020 THE VILLAS (BAHAMAS) LTD HARRY P OAKES C/O       1,973,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1973200 
50434327680004030 KELLOGG CYNTHIA &        1,881,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1881850 
50434327680004040 MIANO JOYCE L        1,881,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1881850 
50434327680004050 BERNARD EUGENE L TRUSTEE        724,111.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1973200 
50434327680004060 LEWINTON CHRISTOPHER & LEWINTON LOUISE       2,358,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2358550 
50434327680005010 PHILLIPS SARAH B        2,408,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2408550 
50434327680005020 COOK PATRICIA L        1,684,520.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    2023200 
50434327680005030 KESSELER H J & SALLY KESSELER SALLY       690,294.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1931850 
50434327680005040 RCM JSM TRUST & MCNAIR ROBERT C TR       1,931,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1931850 
50434327680005050 HAMILTON ANITA J HAMILTON ANITA J TR       1,516,733.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    2023200 
50434327680005060 OLSON FRANK A & OLSON SARAH J       2,408,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2408550 
50434327680006010 PICKETT JOHN O & PICKETT ROBIN R       3,808,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6010 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327680006020 OHERRON KENNEDY C &        3,858,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6020 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327680006030 ALBERT ULF L        1,121,418.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6030 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327690000010 LOVE III        745,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000020 KASSATLY EDWARD & ROBERT KASSATLY TRS       1,000,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000030 MANCHESTER REALTY GROUP        735,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000040 MANHATTAN CORP LOVE REALTY C/O       690,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327700010000 PANOBIANCO GIUSEPPE        1,565,083.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1950 00 03 01 2     244774       4198       4296       4156                 
50434327700010000 PANOBIANCO GIUSEPPE        1,565,083.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1950 00 03 01 2     244774       4198       4296       4156                 
50434327710010010 VIA MIZNER SOUTH REALTY TRUST IACOI JOHN M TR       4,140,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   7853    4140000 
50434327710010020 VIA MIZNER ASSOCIATES LTD PARTNERSHIP        342,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991    890     342000 
50434327710010030 KEAN IAN M        302,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991    788     302000 
50434327710011010 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,357,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1991      0          1 
50434327710011020 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        880,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011030 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        788,401.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011040 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        817,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011050 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        235,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011060 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        230,301.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011070 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        235,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011080 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        585,901.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011090 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        277,901.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011100 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        231,701.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011110 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        345,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011120 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        189,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011140 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        301,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011150 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        555,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011160 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        443,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011170 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        562,101.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011180 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,065,601.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011190 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        852,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011200 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        848,401.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012080 ANGLO AMERICAN HOLDINGS INC        1,061,911.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012160 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,204,981.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012170 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        332,311.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012180 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        286,771.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012190 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        572,221.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710020010 ARGON L C        832,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   2337     832000 
50434327710020020 MAASS ROBB R & MAASS ELIZABETH T       591,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   1605     591000 
50434327710021010 ARGON L C        205,921.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021020 ARGON L C        186,721.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021030 ARGON L C        229,441.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021040 BLACK GRETCHEN B BARZINA C/O       137,761.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021050 BLACK GRETCHEN B BARZINA C/O       148,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021060 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        384,481.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021070 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        240,961.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021080 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        288,481.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021090 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        503,491.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021100 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        684,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021110 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        341,281.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021120 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        160,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021140 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        136,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021150 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        420,961.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710022010 ARGON L C        366,861.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327720000010 WRIGHT ROBERT W & ROBERT WRIGHT TR TITL HLDR       935,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924   1709     985000 
50434327720000020 GALIN ROBERT & GALIN PENELOPE       330,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    845     380000 
50434327720000030 BENAFIELD DENA TRUST BENAFIELD DENA TR       392,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    861     392000 
50434327720000040 HARVELL JAMES C JR &        335,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    470     335000 
50434327730000010 CAMOGE INC        740,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 1 0400 CONDO 1994   1349     740250 
50434327730000020 HOLDER DOUGLAS A SR &        697,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 2 0400 CONDO 1994   1261     697200 
50434327730000030 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       1,035,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 3 0400 CONDO 1994   1582    1035300 
50434327730010010 HOLDER DOUGLAS A SR &        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010020 CLARK JAMES MCCONNELL        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010030 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010040 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010050 WRIGHT ROBERT W & WRIGHT SUSAN C       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010060 GALIN ROBERT        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327740000010 KIMSEY STEPHEN P & KIMSEY MIRIAM O       1,231,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432774 VILLA FIORENTINA CONDO  0400 CONDO 1996   1678    1231650 
50434327740000020 PUNNETT R JOHN        1,051,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432774 VILLA FIORENTINA CONDO  0400 CONDO 1996   1678    1231650 
50434327750000030 BRYANT PATRICIA K BRYANT PATRICIA K TR       31,810.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 0003 0400 CONDO 1968    654     376950 
50434327750000040 OTTINGER KAY & ROY J ROBERTSON C/O       84,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 0004 0400 CONDO 1968    599      84000 
50434327750000050 WHITE THOMAS P JR WHITE TECLA       298,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 5 0400 CONDO 1968    507     298200 
50434327750000060 MESSINA TONY        31,810.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 6 0400 CONDO 1968    738     426300 
50434327750000070 BOLDIN WIENERT K        414,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 7 0400 CONDO 1968    719     414750 
50434327750001010 GRAHAM MICHAEL        696,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 101 0400 CONDO 1968    840     696150 
50434327750001030 GRAHAM MICHAEL        348,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 103 0400 CONDO 1968    840     348600 
50434327750002010 ODONNELL ROBERT J ODONNELL SUE D       706,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 201 0400 CONDO 1968    840     706150 
50434327750002030 GOOCH JOHN H        191,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 203 0400 CONDO 1968    420     191100 
50434327750002040 GOOCH JOHN H        191,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 204 0400 CONDO 1968    420     191100 
50434327750003010 HILLIARD MARY MYERS        1,145,077.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO PH 0400 CONDO 1968   1973    1222200 
50434327770000021 BLICK ANNETTE        641,130.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     738000 
50434327770000022 HOFFMAN HOWARD &        723,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     723000 
50434327770000023 HOWLAND NANCY LYLE        723,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     723000 
50434327770000024 SIAM INC        738,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     738000 
50434327770000031 MCCOUN GORDON W & NAPOLEON BLANCHE       748,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     748000 
50434327770000032 MILLNER DIANE E        343,258.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     733000 
50434327770000033 HOUSER W TODD &        733,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     733000 
50434327770000034 GAST ZDENKA        748,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     748000 
50434327770000041 SASSER JAMES R TR & SASSER MARY B TR       758,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     758000 
50434327770000042 HOWLAND NANCY LYLE        743,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     743000 
50434327770000043 BOURNE INVESTMENTS INC        743,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     743000 
50434327770000044 HARTZ JOHN C JR        454,564.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     758000 
50434327770000051 OAKLEY J ANNETTE        768,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     768000 
50434327770000052 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TRUST WINIFRED C HEAVEY TR       753,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     753000 
50434327770000053 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TRUST WINIFRED C HEAVEY TR       753,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     753000 
50434327770000054 PRATT ROBERT K & PRATT MONICA M       768,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     768000 
50434327770000061 PERKINS FRED F        810,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     810000 
50434327770000062 ASSAD RAMZI T LIVING TRUST        784,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     784000 
50434327770000063 RIZZO FRANK & PALERMO JOANNE       784,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     784000 
50434327770000064 CROWE ROBERT B        810,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     810000 
50434327770000071 GLASSER RICHARD S & GLASSER MARTHA M       1,208,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 7A 0400 CONDO 1980   1516    1208000 
50434327770000072 GEORGIUS JOHN R GEORGIUS JOHN R TR       1,172,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 7B 0400 CONDO 1980   1523    1222000 
50434327780000010 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        4,990,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) CU-1 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780000020 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,600,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) CU-2 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780000080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,150,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) HU 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001000 KIMRON DANIELA        310,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-100 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001010 FORTIN ENTERPRISES INC        635,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-101 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001020 SUITE 102 LLC MURIEL F SIEBERT C/O       478,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-102 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001030 GREENBAUM THOMAS E        634,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-103 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001040 LEVINE NOEL & LEVINE HARRIETTE       887,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-104 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001050 FJA1 LLC        380,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-105 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001060 LEVINE NOEL & LEVINE HARRIETTE       392,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-106 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001070 GALLAGHER NANCY Q        453,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-107 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        382,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-108 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001082 RUDOLPH DANIEL J TR & RUDOLPH DONNA J  TR       342,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-108B 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001090 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,133,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-109 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001100 CRAFT PHILIP C        323,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-110 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001110 CDS BRAZILIAN COURT LLC        1,328,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-112 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001130 MODEL BENNETT        312,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-113 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001140 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        654,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-114 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001150 CULLMAN LEWIS B        1,753,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-115 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001160 PATI H GERBER 1997 TRUST        1,366,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-116 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001170 APPLEGATE L THOMAS & APPLEGATE CATHLEEN H       1,818,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-117 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001180 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,163,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-118 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001190 DANZIGER GIGI GUGGENHEIM        331,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-119 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001200 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        320,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-120 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001210 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        316,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-121 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001220 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        629,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-122 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001230 GRENIER BART A        561,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-123 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001240 STROM KATHRYN CAREY        348,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-124 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001250 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        362,001.00 3 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001280 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        867,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-128 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001290 POPOWICH DAVID & POPOWICH LORRAINE       1,459,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-129 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001300 KRASNOW ROBERT & KRASNOW FAITH       596,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-130 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001310 ASTROP WILLIAM B & ASTROP JEAN T       599,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-131 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001320 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        438,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-132 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002010 BC 201 LLC        946,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002020 FJELDSTAD KATHERINE        435,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002030 CHEUNG CHIEH T & LIN HELEN       626,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002040 CERADINI KAREN LENARD THYLAN C/O       361,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002042 TANG ZHICHUN & SHIA JINRU       420,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002050 CHEUNG CHIEH T & LIN HELEN       389,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002060 DONEGAN MICHAEL C & SHEYBANI MANDANA       316,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002070 DINOSAUR PARTNERS BC LLC        457,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,218,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-208 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002090 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,198,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-209 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002100 KLEINHANDLER DAVID M & KRIEGER MITCHELL       305,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-210 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002110 KUROSU KATSUYUKI & C/O HIDEKO HORIGUCHI       619,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-211 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002120 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        608,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-212 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002130 SINHA ROBIN KUMAR        309,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-213 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002140 FAIRFAX & SAMMONS INVESTMENTS LLC        306,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-214 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002150 SCHWARTZ MERCEDES E        333,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-215 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002160 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,754,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-216 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002170 DEVIVO MICHAEL & DEVIVO GINGER       575,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-217 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002180 BARDWIL JAMES A        572,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-218 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002190 ZOUMAS ASPASIA        639,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-219 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002200 TRENK ALVIN S        651,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-220 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002210 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        680,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-221 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002212 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        418,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 321B 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002213 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        361,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 221C 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002220 ROTTIER ERIC & ROTTIER NORA       334,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-222 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002230 DEMELIO KAREN L        361,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-223 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002240 GOODMAN MARJORIE A        310,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-224 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002250 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        594,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-225 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002260 RICCIARDI MICHAEL & RICCIARDI GINA       566,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-226 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002270 GORDON LARRY & GORDON JANET       334,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-227 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002280 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        864,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-228 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002290 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,302,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-229 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002300 MULLANEY R RYAN JR & MULLANEY SUSAN S       661,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-230 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002310 SPRINGFED LLC        659,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-231 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002320 GUGGENHEIM DAVID S & GUGGENHEIM SHERRI       558,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-232 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002330 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        353,601.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 233 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002340 DAY NATHANIEL B & DAY LUCY R       1,686,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-234 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002350 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        983,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-235 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002360 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        839,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-236 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002370 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        838,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-237 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003010 GM PROPERTIES LLC        1,024,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003020 WHEELOCK MORGAN D & WHEELOCK JUDITH       598,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003030 BAYHOMES HOLDINGS LLC        563,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003040 BENK PAUL & BENK LAURIE L       563,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003050 WIENER LYNN        328,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003060 MARCUS KRYSTAL TR & MARCUS JUDY TR       292,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-306 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003070 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        296,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-307 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        296,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-308 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003090 GAYNOR VERE        301,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-309 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327800003260 STUART-FINDLAY CLIVE        1,200,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432780 CHILEAN CONDOMINIUM OF PALM BEACH***  0400 CONDO 1924   2184    1200000 
50434327800003280 DRENNEN DANIEL E        1,150,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432780 CHILEAN CONDOMINIUM OF PALM BEACH***  0400 CONDO 1924   2184    1200000 
50434334000050010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF LESSOR NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC LESSEE       0.00 40.9 MUNICIPAL                           
50434335000010010 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       1,727,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 01 02 00 2      74092        582        625        482                 
50434335000010010 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       1,727,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 01 2     491145       3050       3117       3033                 
50434335000010020 TIGGES PETER &        8,767,724.00 1.4212 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 05 07 01 2    1969477       9555      10819       8630                 
50434335000010020 TIGGES PETER &        8,767,724.00 1.4212 SINGLE FAMILY 1933 1965 04 05 01 1     360165       6463       6918       5767                 
50434335000010030 RAPAPORT ROBERT D & COBEY W COBEY W RAPAPORT       7,739,427.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1998 00 05 01 2    6061909      15485      17137      14300                 
50434335000010040 SCHLESINGER RICHARD & LESLIE        25,535,705.00 2.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 11 01 3    2575870      14883      21534      12304                 
50434335000010040 SCHLESINGER RICHARD & LESLIE        25,535,705.00 2.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 00 01 00 1      96093        852       1654          1                 
50434335000010060 FALCONE EDWARD        7,191,583.00 0.94 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 08 01 3    1633806       9770      11208       8863                 
50434335000010060 FALCONE EDWARD        7,191,583.00 0.94 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 01 02 00 1      78987        972       1020        900                 
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 2003 05 07 01 2    1594675       6551       7023       6056                 
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1995 01 01 00 1      76972        500        500        500                 
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 03 00 2     576320       2393       2592       2326                 
50434335000010090 822 S COUNTY LLC        12,084,294.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 2000 05 06 01 2    1918063       9341       9704       8967                 
50434335000010090 822 S COUNTY LLC        12,084,294.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 02 03 00 1     481896       2413       2967       2039                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1980 01 01 01 2      44010        469        552        276                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1980 02 01 00 1      97674        988       1175        550                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 2000 05 07 01 2    4458928      10782      13022       9952                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1997 00 02 00 1      67727        563        937          1                 
50434335000010110 VENTO GERALD & VENTO MARGARET       16,015,438.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 10 01 3    6523515      20606      23526      17424                 
50434335000010120 ROYCE CHARLES M & ROYCE DEBORAH G       6,529,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 04 05 01 2    2376011       5530       6055       4714                 
50434335000010120 ROYCE CHARLES M & ROYCE DEBORAH G       6,529,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1973 01 02 00 2     119243        849       1059        750                 
50434335000010130 RAQUET WALTER & RAQUET NANCY       10,017,424.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1967 00 01 00 2     123710       1548       1885        760                 
50434335000010130 RAQUET WALTER & RAQUET NANCY       10,017,424.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1994 05 08 01 2    3093335      12681      16401      11830                 
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1942 02 02 00 1      38104        612        760        494                 
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1942 02 02 00 1      79096       1246       1472        720                 
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 07 01 2    2533362       9854      11692       8295                 
50434335000010160 BILOTTI MARGARET S        4,289,855.00 1.1614 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1996 05 06 01 2    2708314       9775      11214       8581                 
50434335000010160 BILOTTI MARGARET S        4,289,855.00 1.1614 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1996 02 01 00 1     121699       1426       1426       1426                 
50434335000010180 204 VIA DEL MAR LLC        4,025,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434335000010190 VECELLIO LEO A JR & VECELLIO KATHRYN C       8,179,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1996 00 02 00 1     104598        793       1021        391                 
50434335000010190 VECELLIO LEO A JR & VECELLIO KATHRYN C       8,179,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1996 05 06 01 3    2426262       9091      11094       8110                 
50434335000010200 MOENS LAWRENCE A        2,686,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 04 05 01 3     218482       6583       8210       5800                 
50434335000010200 MOENS LAWRENCE A        2,686,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2000 02 03 00 1     311162       2125       2835       1540                 
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1942 02 02 00 2     151771       2776       3384       2178                 
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1942 01 02 00 1      79785       1328       1664        736                 
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1965 05 08 01 2    1100557      10995      11443      10171                 
50434335000010220 CAFARO JOHN J  FAMILY TRUST CAFARO JOHN J TRUSTEE       14,503,945.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2001 05 08 01 3    1281226      17040      24332      14258                 
50434335000010250 BECKER CHARLES E TR        15,989,690.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1999 05 10 00 2    7814168      15269      22253      13171                 
50434335000010260 TOMSICH ROBERT J TR        9,077,296.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1998 01 01 00 1      73252        539        828         60                 
50434335000010260 TOMSICH ROBERT J TR        9,077,296.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1998 05 11 01 2    3750651      17446      21576      13826                 
50434335000010270 TOMSICH ROBERT J        2,875,000.00 0.45 VACANT                           
50434335000010280 PASHCOW JOEL        6,635,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2001 04 05 01 2    3274529       8149       9758       7068                 
50434335000010290 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        3,842,565.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1970 05 07 00 2    1534622       6921       7418       6528                 
50434335000010300 LICHTENBAUM JOYCE M & SUSAN B LICHTENBAUM TRS       2,396,949.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 02 03 00 1       6099       1604       1642       1587                 
50434335000010310 TELESCO DOMINICK & SUSAN SUSAN TELESCO       2,949,309.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 02 02 00 1     107477       1591       1872        936                 
50434335000010310 TELESCO DOMINICK & SUSAN SUSAN TELESCO       2,949,309.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 11 00 2    2762840      12450      13626      11659                 
50434335000010320 ROWAN RENA        2,362,040.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1947 01 01 00 1      77353       1334       1334       1334                 
50434335000010320 ROWAN RENA        2,362,040.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1992 04 05 00 2    1935958       5901       6555       5186                 
50434335000010330 FLYNN MICHAEL & FLYNN ANNE       4,065,159.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1990 05 10 00 2    1488665       8802      10125       7804                 
50434335000010340 DAVIS JUNE R        1,011,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1937 04 05 01 2     463638       6808       7206       6674                 
50434335000010340 DAVIS JUNE R        1,011,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1948 02 02 00 1      78002       1252       1832        752                 
50434335000010350 260 VIA BELLARIA LLC        8,276,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1995 05 07 01 2     905720       9104      12272       6873                 
50434335000010350 260 VIA BELLARIA LLC        8,276,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1990 03 01 00 1     105625       1260       1512        672                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1942 02 02 01 2      84134       1290       1518        759                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 05 11 00 3    5881318      16521      20051      15604                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1999 02 02 00 1     256781       2635       2661       2597                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 2     173884       1871       2575        928                 
50434335000010390 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        690,000.00 0.1 VACANT                           
50434335000010400 GREENBAUM RYNA        6,180,922.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 01 2    3842188       7419       8919       6532                 
50434335000010410 DANKIN DOROTHY F & DOROTHY F DANKIN TRUST       2,200,961.00 0.42 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1955 05 08 00 2    1291559       7234       7535       6868                 
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1998 03 03 01 1     258203       2677       2957       2557                 
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 08 09 04 3   12987054      30437      42196      20543                 
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 01 01 00      215153       1816       3044        627                 
50434335000020010 CHOPIN L FRANK CHOPIN L FRANK TR       4,015,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1985 02 01 01 1     172437       2171       3592       1677                 
50434335000020020 ROLLNICK WILLIAM        3,339,319.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 04 01 2     884291       4926       5601       4353                 
50434335000020020 ROLLNICK WILLIAM        3,339,319.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 02 00 2     140563       1100       1216       1050                 
50434335000020030 MONELL EDMUND C JR & TERRY T TERRY T MONELL       1,349,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 03 03 01 1     366038       3591       3777       3197                 
50434335000020040 POWER RICHARD & POWER MARIA       7,727,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 05 06 01 2    4905716       9503      11392       8698                 
50434335000020040 POWER RICHARD & POWER MARIA       7,727,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 02 00 2      94461        994       1249        573                 
50434335000020050 TIEFEL WILLIAM R &        1,917,327.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 05 06 01 2     922515       8969       9425       8512                 
50434335000020060 YOUNG ANNE R        1,505,598.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 02 02 00 2     131898       1369       1803        776                 
50434335000020060 YOUNG ANNE R        1,505,598.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 03 03 01 1     199993       3186       3259       2895                 
50434335000020070 SCAIFE FRANCES G        2,330,070.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 04 05 01 2      20367       6166       7156       5062                 
50434335000020080 SCAIFE FRANCES G        2,698,394.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 04 06 01 1     699836       5176       5745       4289                 
50434335000020090 CONRAD MARY S        3,480,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 03 03 00 1     324191       4281       4407       4035                 
50434335000020100 SMITH HAROLD B NORTHERN TRUST CO TR       6,147,452.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1980 05 07 01 2    3187541      10614      11660       8952                 
50434335000020110 MENDEL NANCY W        2,985,943.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 04 04 01 2     674560       4989       5540       4224                 
50434335000020120 SCAIFE JENNIE K VEGOSEN DEAN TR       6,555,916.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 09 00 1    1219433       6879       8425       5517                 
50434335000020120 SCAIFE JENNIE K VEGOSEN DEAN TR       6,555,916.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1990 01 01 00 1     103749       1074       1978        209                 
50434335000020140 BORISLOW DANIEL & BORISLOW MICHELE       8,290,578.00 0.9393 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 05 02 2      49124       7743       8988       6263                 
50434335000020150 JACK KARIN        6,191,314.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1991 05 06 01 2    1277310       7487       8048       6736                 
50434335000020170 FOGG NITA S        1,367,286.00 0.51 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 04 00 1     838189       4072       5001       3372                 
50434335000020180 DEITCHER JONATHAN RBC DOMINION SECURITIES C/O       3,518,382.00 0.93 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 1      23883       3574       4032       2746                 
50434335000020190 TOLLMAN BEATRICE        10,958,299.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1954 05 14 01 2     203952      17160      18554      15241                 
50434335000020200 FEICK STUART E        938,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1975 04 04 01 2      74513       4347       4649       3859                 
50434335000020201 GOLDNER NORBERT & GOLDNER LIDIA       2,772,325.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1990 03 03 01 1     724390       4264       4919       3613                 
50434335000020220 PORRECA VANESSA        3,846,298.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1982 05 06 01 1    1331894       7129       7542       6426                 
50434335000020230 HARUVI ABE & HARUVI GIOVANA       3,547,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 03 03 01 1     662903       5681       6453       3996                 
50434335000020240 LIND GERARD G & CAROLYN R LIND CAROLYN R       814,098.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1952 03 03 01 1     319222       3847       4042       3545                 
50434335000020250 BITTON SALOMON &        2,811,877.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 05 06 01 1     248651       6003       7633       4915                 
50434335000020260 HUNT VICTORIA HUNT RECTOR S III       2,879,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 04 04 01 2    1170747       5410       5956       4848                 
50434335000020270 GOSSETT W TED        3,371,256.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 04 01 1     531407       4438       4723       3779                 
50434335000020280 YSC FLORIDA LLC        12,806,925.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1995 05 07 01 2    3733187       7065       8151       5997                 
50434335000020290 RANK PROPERTIES        3,406,906.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 05 07 00 2    1095038       7220       7593       6676                 
50434335000020300 CARSON CREEK CORP CITCO BVI LTD C/O       2,593,857.00 0.44 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 03 03 00 1     276893       3068       3284       2344                 
50434335000020310 VAUGHN CLOTHER H & JOYCE E VAUGHN JOYCE E       597,180.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 03 03 01 1     240582       2799       2930       2493                 
50434335000020320 ANDERSON ALBIN F        895,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1952 01 01 00 1      81951       1149       1352        676                 
50434335000020320 ANDERSON ALBIN F        895,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 00 03 00 1     112176       2710       2811       2666                 
50434335000020330 MADOFF MARION MADOFF BERNARD C/O       4,248,147.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1995 00 05 00 1    1137747       6261       7373       5473                 
50434335000020340 MANDELL RONALD B        1,421,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1985 01 01 00 1      95503        931        931        931                 
50434335000020340 MANDELL RONALD B        1,421,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 04 01 2     729081       4135       4452       3772                 
50434335000020360 ILYINSKY ANGELICA K        4,578,973.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 07 01 2    1402299       7428       7774       6618                 
50434335000020370 GOODRICH FLORIDA REALTY TRUST HINES EDWARD F JR TR       7,358,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 05 05 01 2     515846       6021       6322       5654                 
50434335000020380 GUNDLACH HEINZ L GUNDLACH HEINZ L TR       652,769.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1990 03 04 00 1     407932       4440       4615       4136                 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1927 1965 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1123000      37414         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      35850        414         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      43610        624         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     114200       1870         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1961 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      68750       2534         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1962 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     104140       1608         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1963 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     177550       1968         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1997 1997 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     104610        660         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     469150       2252         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1101660       5042         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2004 2004 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    3437540      17374         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2005 2005 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     567490       5061         
50434335000020391 BARRY MARYANNE        369,495.00 0.16 VACANT                           
50434335000020430 LEHMANN GUNTHER H 1ST NATIONAL PAYMENT SERVICES C/O       9,595,337.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 05 05 01 1    2216067       6293       7026       5702                 
50434335000020440 SCHMEELK RICHARD J &        6,832,651.00 0.65 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2002 05 06 01 2    1637919       7164       7666       6652                 
50434335010000010 KURTZ RICHARD THE KAMSON CORP C/O       6,006,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434335010000020 OKEAN PAUL Z        1,577,654.00 0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1980 04 04 01 1     787647       4418       4562       3987                 
50434335010000031 DONNELLEY THORNE B & MONNIE B DONNELLEY THORNE B       1,771,010.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1955 00 01 00 2      69167        823        968        484                 
50434335010000031 DONNELLEY THORNE B & MONNIE B DONNELLEY THORNE B       1,771,010.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 07 00 2     731859       5121       5356       5076                 
50434335010000060 ALGER GALE        2,169,181.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1995 04 04 00 2     794608       4316       4815       3862                 
50434335010000070 GREEFF OLIVE R        887,119.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1969 01 01 00 1      50185        556        629        387                 
50434335010000070 GREEFF OLIVE R        887,119.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 03 00 1     312244       3789       3924       3539                 
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC        4,579,722.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 03 01 00 1      60107        823        968        484                 
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC        4,579,722.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1970 03 02 00 1     127099       1735       1735       1735                 
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC        4,579,722.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 05 07 00 2     925655       5180       5348       5124                 
50434335010000101 10 VIA VIZCAYA LLC MALASKY HOMES INC C/O       10,884,601.00 0.667 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 06 07 01 2    3495398       9625      10720       8627                 
50434335010000110 11 VIA VIZCAYA LLC MALASKY HOMES INC C/O       6,634,918.00 0.4531 VACANT                           
50434335010000120 KURTZ RICHARD KAMSON CORP C/O       5,405,400.00 0 VACANT                           
50434335010000130 MALASKY DONALD C MALASKY DONALD C REV TRUST       3,310,962.00 0.492 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    1711103       6327       6619       5913                 
50434335010000140 MCHUGH GODFREY T & LILLIAN        2,598,621.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 03 03 00 1     282812       3421       3633       3067                 
50434335020000150 2042312 ONTARIO INC        2,503,452.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 04 01 2    1328384       3990       4481       3532                 
50434335020000161 MELE GAUDIERI ROBBIN ALAN R LEIST JR ET AL TR HLDRS       1,488,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1990 03 03 00 2     375688       3687       3843       3322                 
50434335020000162 KANTER MYRON A & KANTER MYRNA H       1,746,432.00 0.26 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 01 1     586412       3457       3690       3046                 
50434335020000170 LEE J PHILIP & AMY R        1,709,389.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 03 03 01 2     550037       3120       3245       2829                 
50434335020000180 MOSELLE ROBERT        1,512,439.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 03 03 01 1     405733       3226       3375       2669                 
50434335020000190 CALMAN ROBERT F & DORIS S CALMAN DORIS S       581,474.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 05 04 00 2     262200       3002       3093       3033                 
50434335020000200 SCHILLER ELIZABETH J        749,463.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 01 2     431614       3868       4036       3616                 
50434335020000210 ZOIS ELIA        4,596,768.00 0.44 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 04 05 01 2    1558738       6803       7154       6124                 
50434335020000220 DWYER ROBERT J DWYER CONCEITA A       3,331,149.00 0.4599 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1995 05 05 01 2     809012       5853       6843       5253                 
50434335020000231 CAIN JOSEPH        1,916,097.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 04 01 2     749865       4596       4745       4280                 
50434335020000232 KHAWLY MARY T        2,684,344.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 04 04 01 1     707345       4441       6244       3498                 
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR       16,501,073.00 1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1940 03 02 00 2      50231        816        860        750                 
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR       16,501,073.00 1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1980 05 08 01 1     589070      12546      14362      10701                 
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR       16,501,073.00 1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 1      33660        313        521          1                 
50434335030000110 LEE SAN K J        5,636,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1975 02 02 00 2     124790       1268       1586        786                 
50434335030000110 LEE SAN K J        5,636,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 2000 04 06 01 2    1643435       7133       7412       6940                 
50434335030000120 HAMILL STERLING M        4,813,252.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 05 08 01 2    1374901       8210       9610       6500                 
50434335030000140 MARULLI ALFRED & BARBARA MARULLI BARBARA       1,521,175.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 05 05 01 2    1065122       7268       7583       6221                 
50434335030000150 BAKER VICTORIA O        1,198,577.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 05 05 00 1     424128       4885       5276       4237                 
50434335030000160 RICKMAN WILLIAM M JR & MARCIA B TRUST        5,428,857.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 05 04 01 2    1778269       5718       5784       5784                 
50434335030000160 RICKMAN WILLIAM M JR & MARCIA B TRUST        5,428,857.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     134138       1430       1628        968                 
50434335030000171 STUART GLORIA G        5,549,651.00 0.9292 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1990 04 07 00 2     893581       7342      10188       6016                 
50434335030000173 MILLER HOLLY A MILLER MYRON TR       2,430,599.00 0.5507 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1932 01 01 00 1      65507       1099       1335        640                 
50434335030000173 MILLER HOLLY A MILLER MYRON TR       2,430,599.00 0.5507 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 03 03 01 1     667104       3476       4796       2996                 
50434335030000210 MILLER MYRON TR        87,544.00 0.2089 VACANT                           
50434335040000010 WEITZMAN CAROLE        1,537,494.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 05 05 01 2     307959       5843       6470       4494                 
50434335040000020 BOHANNON BENTON P        1,669,433.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 04 05 00 2     454317       4236       5182       3143                 
50434335040000030 JACKSON R E JR JACKSON CAROLYN J       1,203,985.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 05 05 01 3     845065       6322       7185       4606                 
50434335040000040 MCNAMARA JAMES J & MCNAMARA ANGIE       903,290.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 05 06 00 3     714705       6696       7309       6330                 
50434335040000050 STONESTROM ERIC &        2,293,519.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 04 04 01 2    1046161       4888       6032       4286                 
50434335040000060 BROWNLOW GIRARD P III        2,055,401.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 01 2     667295       5305       5417       4952                 
50434335040000070 BERNSTEIN MICHAEL E &        1,173,125.00 0 VACANT                           
50434335040000080 GWYNNE JAY M        1,657,403.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 03 03 01 1     444241       3983       4187       3603                 
50434335040000090 165 KINGS ROAD LLC        9,388,930.00 0.71 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 00 07 01 2    2147916       8151       8789       7577                 
50434335040000110 KCC FLORIDA DEV CORP        6,426,187.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 05 07 00 2    1798003       7280       8460       6540                 
50434335040000120 EMBRESCIA JUDITH A THOMAS J EMBRESCIA TR TITL HLDR       2,058,293.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1980 04 04 00 2     716461       4793       5523       2920                 
50434335040000130 AARON GENE & AARON MINDY       3,879,856.00 0.3285 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 01 2    2458142       6244       6937       5846                 
50434335040000140 KINGS ESTATE INC        1,380,000.00 0.3285 VACANT                           
50434335040000150 KENNEDY SUZANNE W KENNEDY SUZANNE W TR       601,225.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 03 03 00 1     321908       3302       3884       2984                 
50434335040000150 KENNEDY SUZANNE W KENNEDY SUZANNE W TR       601,225.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 01 01 00 1      42068        531        644        483                 
50434335040000160 TAYLOR MILBREY R        1,782,960.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1960 04 04 01 2     232011       4392       5252       3725                 
50434335040000170 WEISSMAN JODY        4,996,926.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1990 05 07 01 3.5    4120162       9347      12380       7480                 
50434335040000180 JDPB HOLDINGS INC        2,041,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1980 04 04 01 2     651439       4403       5287       3784                 
50434335040000190 SCAIFE JENNIE K        2,628,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1998 05 05 01 2     588723       5602       6266       4998                 
50434335050000011 GOODRICH FLORIDA REALTY TRUST COLEMAN JOHN J TR       61,281.00 0 VACANT                           
50434335050000012 SCHNEIDER LEONARD & LILLIAN SCHNEIDER LILLIAN       4,321,743.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 05 05 00 1    2071073       8333       8711       7819                 
50434335050000020 LEHMANN GUNTHER        2,019,568.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1945 02 02 00 1       5303       1860       2054       1279                 
50434335050000032 GRAU ELIZABETH TRUMP        2,563,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 2000 03 03 01 2     793358       6369       6598       6011                 
50434335050000041 HARUVI ABE        1,813,528.00 0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 00 01 00 1       3242        312        312        312                 
50434335050000041 HARUVI ABE        1,813,528.00 0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 04 04 01 1     126619       4229       4498       3824                 
50434335050000051 MUSSER HILLARY G        4,935,324.00 0.47 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 01 2    2279218       7715       8760       6917                 
50434335050000070 JBPB HOLDINGS INC        2,641,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1955 01 01 00 1      58420        811       1113        510                 
50434335050000070 JBPB HOLDINGS INC        2,641,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 03 05 00 1     273485       3135       3324       3054                 
50434335050000080 OELSNER VESNA        1,448,016.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1987 05 05 01 1     682147       5320       5775       4763                 
50434335050000091 RIBIS NICHOLAS L & CAROL A        3,041,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 05 01 1     728657       5406       6253       4784                 
50434335050000101 DEMOSS NANCY S        8,935,900.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 2    1681529       9833      12782       8889                 
50434335050000101 DEMOSS NANCY S        8,935,900.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 07 01 2    2408353       7433       8504       6631                 
50434335050000151 DESMOND DAVID W &        6,526,230.00 0.7748 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 06 01 2    2692177       6767       7541       6348                 
50434335050000151 DESMOND DAVID W &        6,526,230.00 0.7748 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1     224145       1796       1995       1995                 
50434335050000180 DLP LAND INC THE CORPORATION TRUST CO C/O       2,945,505.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1955 01 01 00 1      64558        791        952        440                 
50434335050000180 DLP LAND INC THE CORPORATION TRUST CO C/O       2,945,505.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 03 03 01 2     544201       4955       4994       4994                 
50434335050000191 BALASCO RUSSELL J        842,661.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1990 04 04 00 2     784493       4894       5268       4537                 
50434335050000202 TRUMP DONALD J  WOODBRIDGE 000 124 WOODBRIDGE RD 721 FIFTH AVENUE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2537 2,501,908.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1980 03 03 01 1     197668       3808       4072       2950                 
50434335050000203 TRUMP DONALD J  WOODBRIDGE 000 WOODBRIDGE RD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 86,250.00 0.1894 VACANT                           
50434335050000211 TRUMP DONALD J THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION C/O OCEAN 000 1094  S OCEAN BLVD 725 5TH AVE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2519 5,039,023.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 02 02 00 1     192698       1432       1612       1162                 
50434335050000211 TRUMP DONALD J THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION C/O OCEAN 000 1094  S OCEAN BLVD 725 5TH AVE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2519 5,039,023.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 05 04 00 1    1671486       5492       6251       4643                 
50434335050000240 BARRY MARYANNE        8,971,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 05 11 00 2    1958324       9896      10455       8269                 
50434335080000010 PBC REALTY        7,245,000.00 0.69 VACANT                           
50434335080000020 M & C PROPERTIES        7,245,000.00 0.64 VACANT                           
50434335080000030 MCCARTHY JOSEPH W MCCARTHY GLORIA A       5,206,504.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 07 01 2    3606292      10438      13217       8953                 
50434335080000040 TOLD WILLIAM H JR &        7,018,238.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 07 08 01 3    5763937      10739      12773       9413                 
50434335080000050 KROCK PHYLLIS GARDENIA HOLDING CORP TR       5,016,855.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 05 03 2    3415884       8676      10192       7736                 
50434335080000060 BREYO JOHN        3,168,804.00 0.74 VACANT                           
50434335080000071 BREYO JOHN BREYO MARILYN       7,018,723.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 01 2    3800873       9401      11041       8434                 
50434335080000072 MARCELLO ROCCO A TR        14,879,218.00 1.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 07 01 1    2806903       8577       9924       7347                 

Royal-Hammon
PCN OWNERNAME1 OWNERNAME2 STREETNAME BLK SITEADDR PADDR1 PADDR2 PADDR3 TOTTAXVAL ACRES PROPUSE CAMA-RESBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-RESBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF BEDROOMS NUMBER OF FULL BATHROOMS NUMBER OF HALF BATHROOMS STORY HEIGHT CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING AREA TOTAL AREA SQUARE FOOT LIVING AREA CAMA-COMBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-COMBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF UNITS STORIES CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE DESC CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING AREA COMPLEX ID COMPLEX NAME UNIT NUMBER CLASSIFICATION CODE CLASSIFICATION DESC CAMA-CONDO.YEAR BUILT AREA VALUE 
50434322170000010 STEINDL ETHEL J        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000020 5 E SOUTHLAKE TRUST ANN P FITZGERALD TR       131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000030 FITZGERALD ANN P TR & FITZGERALD W KEVIN TR       131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000040 GARDNER CLAIRE B TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000050 GARDNER CLAIRE B TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000060 BLACK SUSANNE TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000070 DUPONT LEA        828,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1283100 
50434322170000080 HIGGINBOTHAM RICHARD A & HIGGINBOTHAM CAROLE M       1,273,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1271550 
50434322170000090 HIGGINBOTHAM RICHARD A &        895,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1969   1283     895650 
50434322170000100 HODNETT LESLIE Z TR        1,294,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1293100 
50434322170000110 LONG GORDON G LONG GORDON G TR       802,039.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1281550 
50434322170000120 NATORI KENNETH R &        1,281,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1281550 
50434322170000130 MACKINTOSH ELISABETH P ELISABETH PLANKINTON MACKINTOSH REV TRUS       760,342.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1331400 
50434322170000140 FREASE BELDEN A & FREASE DOLINA R       721,961.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1013250 
50434322170000150 WEISER EVELYN        250,624.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1293100 
50434322170000160 PLIMPTON HOLLIS W & PLIMPTON PEGGY L       1,304,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1303100 
50434322170000170 SENGE JURGEN & SENGE GABRIELE       1,293,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1291550 
50434322170000180 BLACK SUSANNE BLACK SUSANNE TR       287,225.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1291550 
50434322170000190 OLSHAN MARVIN L & OLSHAN ROSE       1,341,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1341400 
50434322170000200 SMITH ROBERT B        237,293.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1023250 
50434322170000210 HARTMAN CHARLOTTE B & BRYANT MARK       257,228.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1303100 
50434322170000220 EQUITABLE HOLDING CORP WILLIAM P VANNECK C/O       1,314,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1313100 
50434322170000230 MOORE WILLIAM H III & DOROTHY        1,301,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1301550 
50434322170000240 SOUTHLAKE ENTERPRISES CORP L S CHURCHILL C/O       1,301,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1301550 
50434322170000250 STEINDL ETHEL J        1,351,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1351400 
50434322170000260 FITZGERALD W KEVIN        1,034,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1033250 
50434322170000270 WATERMAN RICHARD        260,529.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1313100 
50434322170000290 MIRANDO FELIX A JR        250,133.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1311550 
50434322170000300 BROWNE H LEE & BROWNE JACQUELYN G       879,191.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1311550 
50434322170000310 CLUETT JEAN DANIELS CLUETT JEAN DANIELS TR       1,067,804.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1361400 
50434322170000320 5 E SOUTHLAKE TRUST ANN P FITZGERALD TR       1,044,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1043250 
50434322170000330 EADES VIRGINIA T        262,488.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1323100 
50434322170000340 LARKIN OWEN G        2,664,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0340 0400 CONDO 1969   4521    2662800 
50434322170000350 GARDNER CLARA B        507,462.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0350 0400 CONDO 1969   2705    1592850 
50434322170000360 ROBBINS SUSAN W ROBBINS RICHARD L       1,273,393.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0360 0400 CONDO 1969   2705    1592850 
50434322170000370 BENZ DOMINIQUE V        1,298,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0370 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1298850 
50434322170000380 COFFIN MARTHA        469,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1969    776     469350 
50434322260001010 PRICE AILENE W        141,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260001020 DONNELLEY RICHARD R III & DONNELLEY ROBIN W       275,218.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260002010 HORNER ROBERT R JR        519,590.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260002020 KAUFMANN ELLEN F        551,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434323050010040 ROSALIND LLC        2,311,796.00 0 MULTIFAMILY           1927 1990 0014 01 2 FIRE RESIS     350220       6336         
50434323050010061 BALLANTINE JOHN W &        2,586,102.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1144977       3719       3892       3368                 
50434323050010062 KELLY ARTHUR L & KELLY DIANE R       2,194,287.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 01 2     983402       3193       3367       2786                 
50434323050010063 BARTHOLOMAY WILLIAM C C/O WILLIS OF ILLINOIS       1,915,341.00 0.08 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 00 2     713256       2317       2449       2008                 
50434323050010064 SCHNEIDER IRA &        2,002,127.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1116965       3627       3800       3276                 
50434323050010065 BRAZILIAN ASSOC #2 LTD HOLLY ADLER C/O       0.00 0.28 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434323050010122 BRAZILIAN ASSOC II LTD HOLLY ADLER C/O       57.00 0.19 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434323050010123 ABELL HELEN H        1,067,681.00 0.1 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1144977       3719       3892       3368                 
50434323050010124 TOWNSEND PENELOPE D        2,116,047.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 01 1     983402       3193       3367       2786                 
50434323050010125 SWEET PHILLIP W JR & SWEET NANCY       1,480,826.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 00 2     713256       2317       2449       2008                 
50434323050010126 DAY JOSEPH C & JOSEPH & DIANA DAY ET AL TR HLDRS       1,757,630.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1121767       3643       3816       3292                 
50434323050010190 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        618,998.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 1      51475       1770       1770       1770                 
50434323050010190 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        618,998.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 2     127535       2778       3203       2694                 
50434323050010221 WOLFE RICHARD W        3,966,355.00 0.1799 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 07 01 2.5    2454198       6081       6600       5522                 
50434323050010222 WOLFE RICHARD W & WOLFE CAROL M       1,375,231.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1970 04 04 00 2     140226       2528       2632       2466                 
50434323050010223 WHALOU PROPERTIES II LLC        862,392.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050010241 GOULD GEORGE D &        3,564,072.00 0.1788 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 07 01 2.5    1941108       5611       5839       5236                 
50434323050020011 ALLISON J RICHARD & ALLISON ANNETTE D       1,588,044.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1953 1985 04 04 00 2     323080       5104       5560       4503                 
50434323050020050 WATKINS CHRISTINE        2,205,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1910 2000 05 05 00 2     284235       3336       3560       3240                 
50434323050020050 WATKINS CHRISTINE        2,205,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1      92636        798        798        798                 
50434323050020070 WELFELD MIMI A        411,241.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1980 00 03 00 1     180760       2176       2176       2176                 
50434323050020090 FRIESE FAMILY TRUST FRIESE PAUL TRUSTEE       552,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1960 00 01 00 2      68973        800        800        800                 
50434323050020090 FRIESE FAMILY TRUST FRIESE PAUL TRUSTEE       552,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 00 03 00 2     166222       1907       1954       1882                 
50434323050020110 SHEHADI EVELYN SHEHADI ELIZABETH       1,485,265.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 02 00 2      78030       1195       1296        960                 
50434323050020110 SHEHADI EVELYN SHEHADI ELIZABETH       1,485,265.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 03 00 2     160046       2064       2267       1960                 
50434323050020130 SHIVERICK PAUL &        3,322,419.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1474385       5192       5697       4772                 
50434323050020150 BIDWELL BENNETT E & BIDWELL PAULA N       3,265,980.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 04 01 1    1415772       4951       5412       4407                 
50434323050020170 YELVINGTON GARY REV TRUST OF 1997 YELVINGTON GARY TR       3,675,936.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 2    1837281       5354       5528       4984                 
50434323050020190 GAGE JOHN Z & GAGE KAREN S       2,130,353.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1918 1980 00 03 00 2     299078       2432       2764       2290                 
50434323050020210 DEZIEL ROBERT E        1,512,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1985 00 03 01 2     420336       4376       4536       4342                 
50434323050020231 HEYDON PETER N & HENRIETTA M        1,552,800.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 03 01 2      29552       2881       3003       2617                 
50434323050020232 SHAFFER MARGARET S        864,921.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1990 00 03 00 2     585083       3318       3384       3164                 
50434323050020261 STUART GLORIA G        1,675,677.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 03 00 1      29546       2729       2928       2438                 
50434323050030011 KASSATLY EDWARD M & ROBERT F KASSATLY       1,272,644.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 03 00 2      13927       2731       2944       2560                 
50434323050030011 KASSATLY EDWARD M & ROBERT F KASSATLY       1,272,644.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1960 00 01 00 1      72337       1024       1024       1024                 
50434323050030012 337 339 COCOANUT ROW LLC        1,388,931.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      30321        514        514        514                 
50434323050030012 337 339 COCOANUT ROW LLC        1,388,931.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1955 00 03 01 2     171457       3132       3156       3102                 
50434323050030013 TRANSAMERICAN PROPERTIES INC        1,106,842.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1928 1950 0006 01 1 WOOD FRAME      11590       4976         
50434323050030030 GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E & JEFFRY GIANGRANDE TR TITL HLDR       3,571,934.00 0.188 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 01 2    1789416       4506       4832       4078                 
50434323050030130 BASS JACK M JR & BASS MELINDA       3,555,435.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1794081       5027       5387       4614                 
50434323050030150 HOLLIS EARL A JR TR        3,682,821.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1922455       5391       5897       4940                 
50434323050030171 THREE 24 BRAZILIAN AVE INC MIGUEL GUZMAN C/O       1,429,298.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1995 04 03 00 2     373871       2321       2589       2214                 
50434323050030410 ANTHONY RUTH D TR SUN TRUST BANK TRUSTEE C/O       3,533,471.00 0.1719 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2032706       4246       4726       3835                 
50434323050030421 MENDLER HENRY & LAWTON SUZANNE       3,259,490.00 0.1379 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2145389       4485       4956       4050                 
50434323050030441 RUSSO JOSEPH L & RUSSO CAROL B       3,340,036.00 0.1722 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2014290       4208       4686       3795                 
50434323050040011 DEAN MARGARET M        3,230,146.00 0.1872 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 3    2929118       4958       5996       4421                 
50434323050040012 KINNEAR FINANCIAL CONSULTING LTD PENGROWTH MGMT LTD C/O       3,844,294.00 0.1765 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 05 01 3    2413965       5729       6744       5231                 
50434323050040040 455 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE CORP        57.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050040090 449 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE LLC        1,518,688.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1948 1958 06 06 00 1      98688       2325       2401       2305                 
50434323050040110 STEWARD GRACE VANNER        1,428,641.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1965 00 01 00 1       7749       1229       1305       1053                 
50434323050040230 AULT MICHAEL VAN C & VAN CLIEF FAITH       1,281,104.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1940 00 01 00 1       4367        851        880        880                 
50434323050040230 AULT MICHAEL VAN C & VAN CLIEF FAITH       1,281,104.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1944 00 01 00 1       6492       1477       1607       1468                 
50434323050040283 YUNGHANNS PATRICIA        924,168.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1975 00 02 00 2     209451       3085       3238       2932                 
50434323050040360 KEITEL FREDERICK J III        1,608,438.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 03 02 00 1     154483       2033       2033       2033                 
50434323050040380 BARKER JAMES H & DOUGLAS KENNETH W JR       2,047,210.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 00 2     316979       5049       5598       4043                 
50434323050040410 OKAIN DEBORAH L        1,853,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 00 04 00 2     398662       4168       4579       3853                 
50434323050040430 CHRISTMAN PAUL R &        2,559,435.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1980 02 02 00 2      88418       1035       1294        970                 
50434323050040430 CHRISTMAN PAUL R &        2,559,435.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1990 03 03 01 2     735527       2776       3184       2408                 
50434323050040450 BRAZILIAN AVENUE LLC C/O STEVE DATTELS       3,153,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    1391673       4093       4608       3586                 
50434323050040470 RODDY CHARLES T        832,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1948 00 03 01 2      11686       3617       3850       3229                 
50434323050040510 BRANSTROM WILLIAM J III & BRANSTROM ROBIN R       1,770,805.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 00 2      28527       2505       2554       2484                 
50434323050040530 TARA HAMPTON INC        3,941,584.00 0.19 MFR <10 UNITS 1999 1999 03 04 01 2    2180137       4710       5534       4055                 
50434323050040541 TELESE NANCY E        2,392,112.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1914671       4850       5676       4194                 
50434323050050060 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050050100 SMITH MATTHEW K & SMITH TRACY E       3,958,192.00 0.2296 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 01 2    1992244       5003       5250       4525                 
50434323050050131 SALTZMAN IRVIN & SALTZMAN BARBARA R       2,511,418.00 0.165 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 05 01 2    1566946       4361       4683       3974                 
50434323050050151 FOWLER MARK S FOWLER MARK S TR       2,413,354.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 03 01 2    1643347       4574       4848       4199                 
50434323050050261 360 COCOANUT ROW LLC        3,190,540.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2005 03 05 01 1    1883610       4556       4813       4196                 
50434323050050262 WINTER RICHARD & WINTER BELLA       2,838,224.00 0.2 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1983296       5113       5496       4712                 
50434323050050350 PORTER HERBERT R JR & PORTER ALINA M       2,737,108.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 06 01 2    1485356       5665       6116       5296                 
50434323050050380 MORTARA VIRGINIA        2,359,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 00 03 01 2     426680       3553       3692       3419                 
50434323050050380 MORTARA VIRGINIA        2,359,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1949 00 02 00 2     130388       2195       2268       2100                 
50434323050050410 EDENS ROBERT L III EDENS ROBERT LUTHER III TR       1,609,586.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 03 02 01 1     283783       1779       1796       1772                 
50434323050050430 GOODERHAM EDWARD D TR ET AL        1,453,653.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1948 00 02 00 2     116733       2109       2216       1986                 
50434323050050450 430 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE LLC        3,081,971.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1971 1971 0005 01 2 FIRE RESIS     445400       7548         
50434323050050490 CASTILFORTI LLC        1,583,181.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1951 1990 00 04 00 2     264693       3167       3321       3066                 
50434323050050510 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050050540 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050060010 T H COURT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        4,698,515.00 0.43 MOTEL           1918 1985 0055 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2212140      32758         
50434323050060070 LOCKS MARK        1,325,705.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 00 00 2     357517       3083       3292       2744                 
50434323050060090 HAYMES ANNE MARIE        1,633,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 00 00 2     358296       3089       3292       2753                 
50434323050060110 BUCKLAND PETER & FIRST NATIONAL PAYMENT SVCS C/O       1,560,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 1     234202       1948       2060       1900                 
50434323050060130 FRANKEL FRANK        1,412,341.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 2      65983        765        861        826                 
50434323050060130 FRANKEL FRANK        1,412,341.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 03 00 2     239427       2631       2760       2594                 
50434323050060150 SLOMOWITZ MARVIN & SLOMOWITZ ISOBEL       5,362,117.00 0.4104 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 01 2    1784596       6269       6977       5667                 
50434323050060181 SADLER SHANNON G        280,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1949 00 01 00 1      39216        512        512        512                 
50434323050060181 SADLER SHANNON G        280,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 02 00 1     144342       1448       1475       1451                 
50434323050060201 PUCILLO BIAGINA        281,592.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1949 00 01 00 1      37414        523        552        516                 
50434323050060201 PUCILLO BIAGINA        281,592.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1955 00 02 00 1     145262       1416       1472       1407                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 00 02 00 1      97965       1279       1362       1248                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1941 00 01 00 2      84602       1628       1700       1460                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 00 01 00 1      29504        459        459        459                 
50434323050060251 CIOC ERICA & IOANA CIOC & DOINA CIOC-BENAC       1,166,319.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1956 1970 00 03 01 1     132248       2259       2293       2245                 
50434323050060252 CSC BRAZILIAN LP CEEBRAID SIGNAL CORP C/O       1,584,354.00 0.16 OFFICE 1 STORY           1930 2007 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     579800       4671         
50434323050060320 DOUBLE L FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LAURA ANTHONY JOHNSTON C/O       1,352,293.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1956 1956 04 04 00 2      32430       2771       3116       2600                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1936 00 01 00 1       4517        264        264        264                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1940 00 01 00 1       8234        470        483        467                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 1      22339       1557       1872       1428                 
50434323050060360 PRESSLY JAMES G JR & PRESSLY KATHRYN       1,468,521.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1970 00 02 00 1     132629       1571       1911       1293                 
50434323050060380 HAFT ALLISON R HAFT STUART J       1,676,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 02 00 2      73926       1212       1212       1212                 
50434323050060380 HAFT ALLISON R HAFT STUART J       1,676,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 00 2     281149       2490       2870       2380                 
50434323050060420 KANE DAVID P        363,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1955 04 03 00 2     161035       2803       2952       2760                 
50434323050060420 KANE DAVID P        363,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1941 00 02 00 2      37178        637        909          1                 
50434323050060450 SCULLY JOHN S        4,878,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2001 05 06 01 2    3081355       7692       8474       7364                 
50434323050060490 GOLDENBERG MARVIN MARVIN GOLDENBERG TR TITL HLDR       1,488,483.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1167948       3941       4481       3422                 
50434323050060510 KENT JORIE B KENT JORIE B TR       2,356,896.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1200372       4361       4883       3698                 
50434323050060530 REED GENE        2,438,438.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1094998       3797       4108       3255                 
50434323050060541 CAIN BARBARA A        1,732,281.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1122690       3787       4063       3255                 
50434323050070011 GROBE-SNYDER LOUISE        2,072,869.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 00 00 2     899145       3735       3943       3382                 
50434323050070012 HOVSEPIAN SUREN        917,417.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 00 00 2     899385       3736       3944       3383                 
50434323050070030 SULLIVAN JOHN A & SULLIVAN SHARLA J       1,220,686.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 01 01 00 1      58152        572        760        468                 
50434323050070030 SULLIVAN JOHN A & SULLIVAN SHARLA J       1,220,686.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 00 02 00 2     299163       2780       2900       2729                 
50434323050070050 HERON JEAN ELLEN HERON JEAN ELLEN TR       1,413,895.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 03 00 2      77393       1598       1640       1640                 
50434323050070050 HERON JEAN ELLEN HERON JEAN ELLEN TR       1,413,895.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1960 05 04 00 2     169065       2641       2790       2582                 
50434323050070060 KARAYIANNAKIS ANNA K        1,041,862.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1960 1960 0005 01 2 FIRE RESIS     160950       3993         
50434323050070070 PIERCE POONSRI POONSRI PIERCE TR TITL HLDR       649,562.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1940 04 04 00 2      52784       2497       2599       2471                 
50434323050070070 PIERCE POONSRI POONSRI PIERCE TR TITL HLDR       649,562.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1957 1960 00 03 00 2      22596       1143       1199       1033                 
50434323050070080 ANDRE LAURA        1,508,810.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1962 1962 00 03 01 2     237758       3524       3694       3378                 
50434323050070090 JAMGOCHIAN GEORGE M & JAMGOCHIAN DEBORAH S       1,325,371.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1949 1955 00 04 00 2       7171       2664       2888       2500                 
50434323050070100 WAHLESTEDT LISA T & WAHLESTEDT CLAES       1,091,100.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 02 00 2     240279       3069       3314       2964                 
50434323050070110 THREE 50 REALTY CORP LOVE REALTY GEDNEY STATION C/O       6,000,000.00 0.7232 STORE/OFF/RES           1952 1995 0013 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2494400      26569         
50434323050070181 FORTIN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC        1,606,076.00 0.1386 STORES           1962 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     153680       1729         
50434323050070182 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.1036 FOREST/PK/REC                           
50434323050070231 MWB FAMILY TRUST OCONNELL TARA TR &       4,663,505.00 0.2419 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    2590451       6173       6427       5776                 
50434323050070270 MAY MICHAEL J        1,909,718.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 04 01 2    1536228       3949       4256       3585                 
50434323050070290 229 CHILEAN AVENUE LLC        2,834,118.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 05 00 2    1469552       3811       4220       3384                 
50434323050070310 REED GORDON P & MARY G MARY G GORDON       401,128.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 03 00 1     155478       2174       2230       2122                 
50434323050070330 STEPHAN MCGLONE MARYLYNNE &        2,406,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 04 03 02 2    1075295       4178       4330       3968                 
50434323050070350 CLAGGETT BARBARA C BARBARA C CLAGGETT TR TITL HLDR       757,474.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 04 03 02 2    1075295       4178       4330       3968                 
50434323050070371 CANTOR MABEL 2008 REV TRUST        1,222,855.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 00 02 00 1     214881       1506       1589       1511                 
50434323050070372 HOBERG FREDERICK W        1,684,468.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1965 00 03 00 1     217876       2596       2846       2272                 
50434323050080010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.4 MUNICIPAL           2004 2004 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      58030        792         
50434323050080010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.4 MUNICIPAL           2004 2004 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2912060      22775         
50434323050080050 SALEEBY SHIRLEY        1,001,150.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1917 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     157400       3080         
50434323050080060 CBRS REALTY LTD        1,718,631.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1948 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     371430       8400         
50434323050080080 PBI LLC        2,952,909.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1990 0004 01 1 WOOD FRAME     952250      12035         
50434323050080110 GILBERTSON E NORDIN & GILBERTSON B CHARLOTTE       402,395.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1918 1929 00 03 00 2       7025       2926       3321       2673                 
50434323050080110 GILBERTSON E NORDIN & GILBERTSON B CHARLOTTE       402,395.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1918 1936 00 01 00 1       1342        520        520        520                 
50434323050080150 AMORE J TRUST        2,617,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 00 02 00 1     169851       2548       2829       2208                 
50434323050080150 AMORE J TRUST        2,617,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 00 01 00 2       3748       2230       2706       2097                 
50434323050080180 OHANNESSIAN ANTOINE        1,968,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1937 00 03 00 1      79357       2074       2193       1800                 
50434323050080180 OHANNESSIAN ANTOINE        1,968,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1950 00 03 01 2     232402       3243       3278       3228                 
50434323050080210 CHANT CORP        1,759,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1911 1970 00 03 00 2      12413       2808       2882       2387                 
50434323050080210 CHANT CORP        1,759,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1915 1950 00 02 00 1       4283        945       1098        666                 
50434323050080241 ALNA LLC        1,418,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1950 00 01 00 1      22752        432        432        432                 
50434323050080241 ALNA LLC        1,418,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1970 00 02 00 1     119718       1605       1616       1600                 
50434323050080270 LOWDEN ROBERT D & BEVERLY C LOWDEN BEVERLY C       386,554.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1909 1985 00 03 00 2     219095       2291       2650       1972                 
50434323050080291 COLLINS JAMES L & COLLINS SUSAN S       824,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1985 00 02 00 1      93490       2141       2176       2176                 
50434323050080311 SHUBERT NANCY E        1,353,739.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 00 02 00 1     233515       1550       1834       1238                 
50434323050080430 SULLIVAN A MICHAEL JR        529,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1955 00 01 00 2      78082        942       1177        589                 
50434323050080430 SULLIVAN A MICHAEL JR        529,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1970 00 04 00 2     283045       2812       3157       2684                 
50434323050080440 ZOSLOW SYLVIA L ZOSLOW SYLVIA L TR       355,382.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      47125        630        798        399                 
50434323050080440 ZOSLOW SYLVIA L ZOSLOW SYLVIA L TR       355,382.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     180780       2407       2442       2392                 
50434323050080450 OSMENA MARIA VICTORIA R TR TEMPLETON & COMPANY LLP C/O       2,243,644.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1970 00 02 00 1      10799       1871       2060       1518                 
50434323050080470 DIXON FRANCIGENE S YOUNG SHERIDAN TR       1,086,913.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1975 00 03 00 1     410939       4135       4361       3735                 
50434323050080490 FLYNN MICHAEL J & FLYNN ANNE J       1,704,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 04 04 01 3     504420       4644       4837       4569                 
50434323050080490 FLYNN MICHAEL J & FLYNN ANNE J       1,704,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 01 00 2      61800        709        849        400                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1910 1950 03 01 00 1       6282        871        930        846                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1937 02 01 00 1       3794        627        627        627                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 05 04 00 2      16904       3558       3558       3558                 
50434323050090010 THREE SEVENTY FIVE SOUTH COUNTY ASSOC/GEDNEY STATION       5,000,000.00 0.5539 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     555410       5421         
50434323050090010 THREE SEVENTY FIVE SOUTH COUNTY ASSOC/GEDNEY STATION       5,000,000.00 0.5539 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1744690      11271         
50434323050090090 SPEYER ALEXANDER C JR        1,303,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 2     136619       1856       1862       1842                 
50434323050090090 SPEYER ALEXANDER C JR        1,303,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1964 00 02 00 1      49959        666        666        666                 
50434323050090110 PAOLOZZI THOMAS F &        1,542,405.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1960 00 02 00 1     149275       1836       1982       1823                 
50434323050090130 BROWNSTONE HOLDINGS GROUP GOLDFINGER & LASSAR C/O       1,463,574.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 03 00 2     341677       3569       3705       3620                 
50434323050090150 TONELLI JOHN        1,589,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1933 00 02 00 2      84585       1978       2027       1904                 
50434323050090150 TONELLI JOHN        1,589,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 00 2     184886       2359       2523       2313                 
50434323050090171 FARAWAY SHORES LTD        2,014,138.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1988 04 03 00 1     231954       2568       2637       2577                 
50434323050090201 FAIRBANKS DANIEL J        1,336,533.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1985 00 03 01 2     273729       3500       3624       3450                 
50434323050090230 RITTERBUSH STEPHEN W & RITTERBUSH KAREN J &       1,852,782.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1912 1980 00 03 00 2     643637       3007       3206       2946                 
50434323050090230 RITTERBUSH STEPHEN W & RITTERBUSH KAREN J &       1,852,782.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1975 00 02 00 2      84420       1077       1095       1050                 
50434323050090250 ROWAN LISA        2,872,204.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 2      69410        816        960        480                 
50434323050090250 ROWAN LISA        2,872,204.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1993 04 04 01 2     557697       4844       5002       4582                 
50434323050090290 NASSER JOSEPH A        424,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1945 00 01 00 2      55686        823        968        484                 
50434323050090290 NASSER JOSEPH A        424,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 04 03 00 2     219256       2681       2781       2720                 
50434323050090310 DICKSON DORIS R        395,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1945 02 01 00 2      55686        823        968        484                 
50434323050090310 DICKSON DORIS R        395,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 04 03 00 2     216440       2541       2607       2573                 
50434323050090480 GRANT RICHARD H JR & C/O ROBINSON REALTY & PROP MGMT       3,598,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 05 00 2    1357909       7526       8442       6318                 
50434323050090580 HIGHLANDS MOBILE HOME PARK & SALES INC        1,097,415.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1992 00 02 00 2      86947       1240       1377       1068                 
50434323050090580 HIGHLANDS MOBILE HOME PARK & SALES INC        1,097,415.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1992 00 02 00 2     168848       1261       1261       1261                 
50434323050090600 ALBAN CO        1,153,801.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1980 02 02 00 1     145680       1917       2035       1672                 
50434323050100010 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        2,345,810.00 0.72 PKG LT / MH PK                           
50434323050100070 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        1,186,380.00 0.14 VACANT                           
50434323050100090 GILBERT HENRY A III        888,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1936 00 01 00 1      51138        868       1024        528                 
50434323050100090 GILBERT HENRY A III        888,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 02 00 2     181812       2583       2853       2432                 
50434323050100110 CELEDINAS RAY S & CELEDINAS KIM R       1,836,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      23648        748        966        420                 
50434323050100110 CELEDINAS RAY S & CELEDINAS KIM R       1,836,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 03 00 2      96169       2547       2552       2552                 
50434323050100180 HOLLIS EARL A INC        1,187,375.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050100240 CHURCH OF BETHESDA BY THE SEA        0.00 0 STORES           1935 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     376790       4710         
50434323050100280 RHINO REAL ESTATE INC        4,242,109.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1983 2007 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1732590       5998         
50434323050100320 RISOTTO REALTY        1,443,070.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1953 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     193070       2601         
50434323050100340 RISOTTO REALTY        1,761,275.00 0 RESTAURANT           1935 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     510490       4280         
50434323050100360 HOLLIS EARL A INC        1,593,333.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1950 1970 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     343150       5284         
50434323050100380 BROBERG GUSTAVE T JR & BROBERG STEWART C       1,928,520.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1986 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     678520       4341         
50434323050100400 RINKER RUBY S REV LIVING TRUST RINKER RUBY S TRUSTEE       1,875,867.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1962 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     624550       5536         
50434323050100420 KAHN EDWARD & KAHN ADELE       765,737.00 0 STORES           1928 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      46120       1931         
50434323050100440 KAHN EDWARD & KAHN ADELE       2,611,673.00 0 STORES           1950 1970 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     110010       3379         
50434323050110110 334 CHILIAN LLC        2,102,723.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1979 00 07 00 2     273275       4116       4582       3737                 
50434323050110200 DEVENOW MAUDETTE H MAUDETTE H DEVENOW TR TITL HLDR       2,158,474.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1272725       4512       4812       4195                 
50434323050110221 HOLTZMAN SEYMOUR &        2,676,377.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 2    1775629       4491       4927       4146                 
50434323050110250 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.57 CULTURAL           1994 1994 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      16890        346         
50434323050110250 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.57 CULTURAL           1994 1994 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      26910        304         
50434323050110330 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0 CULTURAL           2004 2004 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1563780       6260         
50434323050110360 MADDOCK PAUL L JR & BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRS       3,607,476.00 0 PROF OFFICES           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1731070       6474         
50434323050110390 CINQUE PARTNERS LTD        784,894.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1949 00 03 00 2     132962       2596       2613       2613                 
50434323050110410 L G LIMA LLC        3,776,047.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     256680       4365         
50434323050110460 341 PERUVIAN LLC        3,320,651.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1990 00 03 00 2     454693       2519       2563       2500                 
50434323050110460 341 PERUVIAN LLC        3,320,651.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1967 1990 00 03 01 1     948904       5483       6307       4476                 
50434323050110530 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        4,473,249.00 0 STORES           1950 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     346900       2058         
50434323050110530 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        4,473,249.00 0 STORES           1958 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     686460       4868         
50434323050120190 BEARD ANSON M JR & BEARD DEBRA W       1,643,717.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1950 04 02 00 2     519439       3873       4541       2873                 
50434323050120211 WIENERT KATHERINE B        464,434.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     499779       1390       1390       1390                 
50434323050120212 BERNHARD WILLIAM L & CAHILL CATHERINE       1,045,233.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     497257       1383       1442       1358                 
50434323050120213 CATHEDRAL ESTATES LTD MS. KIM MORGAN CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN       1,063,274.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     515714       1546       1546       1546                 
50434323050120231 STEELE T GARRICK        1,042,356.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     494241       1422       1422       1422                 
50434323050120232 FINDLAY KATHERINE D        929,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     380145        927        927        927                 
50434323050120233 BLAIR BOWEN W BLAIR CO C/O       1,176,052.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     626192       1966       2002       1942                 
50434323050120251 SANDERSON FREDA L        131,820.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120252 BERNHARD WILLIAM L & CAHILL CATHERINE &       131,820.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120253 FINDLAY KATHERINE D        91,260.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120254 OHERRON EDWARD M JR TR &        91,260.00 0.02 VACANT                           
50434323050120255 BOLDIN WIENERT KATJA        50,700.00 0.01 VACANT                           
50434323050120256 BLAIR BOWEN W BLAIR CO C/O       0.00 0.01 VACANT                           
50434323050120340 DEBENEDICTIS DANIELLE E        1,953,695.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1995 00 03 01 2    1204624       4200       4200       4200                 
50434323050120360 BEARD NANCY N & BEARD JOHN L       5,082,287.00 0.36 MFR <10 UNITS 1999 1999 03 03 01 2    2150747       6128       8440       5056                 
50434323050120410 DOUBLE L FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LAURA ANTHONY JOHNSTON C/O       1,348,556.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1953 00 03 01 2      29925       2907       3277       2704                 
50434323050120430 VANDERGRIFT JAMES B VANDERGRIFT JAMES B TR       1,542,072.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 02 00 2      10519       2396       2500       2352                 
50434323050120520 MURPHY GARY L TR        1,552,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 00 04 00 2     233154       2847       2990       2636                 
50434323050120540 NASSAU SQ CO OP APTS INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050130100 FRISBIE DAVID W DAVID W FRISBIE TR TITL HLDR       2,461,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1925 1975 0009 01 1 WOOD FRAME     157180       3932         
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1925 1975 0077 01 1 WOOD FRAME     968140      25827         
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1962 1975 0045 01 2 FIRE RESIS     717010      16902         
50434323050140030 DUNCAN MIMI G MIMI DUNCAN TR TITL HLDR       737,375.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     515890       1584         
50434323050140030 DUNCAN MIMI G MIMI DUNCAN TR TITL HLDR       737,375.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1139660       8357         
50434323050140130 LOVE III LLC        2,508,151.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES                           
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1958 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      68070       1046         
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1958 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     234230       2524         
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1972 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      89270       1067         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     265880       2017         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     832310       7163         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1182780       7358         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1988 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     180090       1190         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1999 1999 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     282920       1794         
50434323050140241 LOVE II LLC GEDNEY STATION       2,682,710.00 0 STORES           1952 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     611350       6742         
50434323050140242 CHANEL INC DIRECTOR OF TAX DEPT C/O       10,627,792.00 0.4 STORES           1929 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3222580      22047         
50434323050140331 LOVE LLC        6,000,000.00 0.2583 STORES           1929 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     605360       7779         
50434323050140391 NEW PALM        4,074,944.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1929 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1199590       8443         
50434323050140430 WORTH AVENUE HOLDINGS LLC        2,736,730.00 0 STORES           1925 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     724230       2559         
50434323050140510 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        7,300,000.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     370410       7780         
50434323050140510 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        7,300,000.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     975990      20526         
50434323050150010 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        5,424,130.00 1.38 PKG LT / MH PK                           
50434323050150200 LOVE LLC GEDNEY STATION       1,283,286.00 0 WAREH/DIST TERM           1956 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      30800       1050         
50434323050150220 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050150280 LENDAN INC        11,674,980.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1958 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2956230      35525         
50434323050150340 LOVE LLC GEDNEY STATION       6,752,900.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1929 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1126700      12886         
50434323050150380 PA FL ASSOC HOWE & ADDINGTON C/O       7,834,870.00 0 STORES           1950 2005 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2209870       9932         
50434323050150420 MIKLOR EQUITIES INC        3,234,270.00 0 STORES           1940 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     359270       3500         
50434323050150440 237-243 WORTH AVENUE LTD PARTNERSHIP REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PRTNS C/O       7,112,845.00 0 STORES           1925 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1487470       8528         
50434323050150480 HOLZER JANE B        6,708,300.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     443630       4732         
50434323050150480 HOLZER JANE B        6,708,300.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     639670       5643         
50434323050150520 MADDEN FAMILY ASSOCIATES LTD ANTHONY MARINO JR C/O       7,517,120.00 0 STORES           1950 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3298370      16374         
50434323050160010 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD        5,401,968.00 0 STORES           1945 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     380090       6750         
50434323050160090 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES II LP        1,162,819.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 00 03 00 1      39642       2486       2734       2300                 
50434323050160110 FOX YOLANDE & CHERIF GUELLAL % FRED GOBIC       1,366,006.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 03 00 1     246482       2070       2178       1873                 
50434323050160130 SECOND WORTH COMPANY LLC        23,600,000.00 1.01 DEPT STORE           2000 2000 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF   18342810      48578         
50434323050160160 LEFKOWITZ ELISE G 2005 C TRUST LEFKOWITZ ELISE G 2005 M TRUST       2,211,356.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 03 03 00 1     523587       3064       3221       2807                 
50434323050160250 MARUCCI GEORGE JR        1,789,557.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 03 00 2     647582       3488       4069       3057                 
50434323050160270 KELLER MICHAEL I VEALE DANIEL L       1,348,160.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1975 00 02 00 2      53766        742        756        720                 
50434323050160270 KELLER MICHAEL I VEALE DANIEL L       1,348,160.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1975 00 03 01 2     178154       2827       2827       2827                 
50434323050160361 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.01 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050160380 WHALOU PROPERTIES III LLC        19,552,213.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1974 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    8545020      49401         
50434323050160600 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD LOVE REALTY  C/O       6,200,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1971 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1504950      10716         
50434323050160600 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD LOVE REALTY  C/O       6,200,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1979 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      54870        156         
50434323050170011 WORTH AVENUE ASSOC LTD        34,500,000.00 2.02 SH CTR CMMITY           1979 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1635080      37017         
50434323050170011 WORTH AVENUE ASSOC LTD        34,500,000.00 2.02 SH CTR CMMITY           1979 1990 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF   11559640      91638         
50434323050170012 WORTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES LTD THE GOODMAN CO PHILIPS POINT C/O       7,347,480.00 0 DEPT STORE           1979 1990 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    7347480      62484         
50434323050180010 POWER LOVE ASSOC LOVE REALTY C/O       14,115,315.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1794810      13069         
50434323050180010 POWER LOVE ASSOC LOVE REALTY C/O       14,115,315.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2854150      19533         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1931 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2924970      32380         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1936 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     471030       4055         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     266880       2720         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1958 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     462950       4556         
50434323050180170 WORTH PONDFIELD WAXMAN MARK C/O       5,682,190.00 0 STORES           1956 2005 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2347190       7592         
50434323050180190 NAPOLEON PALM BEACH        6,614,630.00 0.25 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     563260       2382         
50434323050180190 NAPOLEON PALM BEACH        6,614,630.00 0.25 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1069570       6058         
50434323050180212 MASTERS ROSLYN H & MARJORIE HAUSMAN       2,047,870.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES 1925 1929 00 01 00 1      38950        922        966        790 1925 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     174670       2139         
50434323050180230 MODA IMPORTS INC        15,594,348.00 0 STORES           1950 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1672910      15035         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1920 1990 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME    6276050      80380         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1966 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2257990      24352         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1980 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     101220        709         
50434323050190200 NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF FLA TR        4,383,539.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1931 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1048030       9509         
50434323050190220 LOVE 300        10,925,554.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    3413610      25272         
50434323050200010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 6.97 AIRPORT/MARINA           1970 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      38560        490         
50434323050200010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 6.97 AIRPORT/MARINA           1970 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      97090       2150         
50434323050200020 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,690,298.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1988 05 06 00 2    1668888       5176       5442       5062                 
50434323050200030 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.3759 MUNICIPAL           1922 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2407330      25115         
50434323050200040 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.395 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050230491 WHALOU PROPERTIES II LLC        9,993,780.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1966 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4385040      28548         
50434323050230510 BATMASIAN JAMES H & BATMASIAN MARTA T       7,025,811.00 0 PROF OFFICES           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3813790      12948         
50434323050230520 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       3,544,619.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     327230      16836         
50434323050230530 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 2 LLC &       16,092,842.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF   12875830      46373         
50434323050230541 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       10,293,885.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1962 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6335160      25316         
50434323050230541 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       10,293,885.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     832110       7462         
50434323050230611 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       2,857,816.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050230612 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       532,800.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050240421 LAKE TRAIL        927,865.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1970 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME     297040       2662         
50434323050240422 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS INC       0.00 0 ORPHNG/NON-PROF           1949 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1065350      14045         
50434323050240422 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS INC       0.00 0 ORPHNG/NON-PROF           1966 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     918350      10250         
50434323050240440 BROADWAY RPW REV STATUTORY TRUST BROADWAY RPW ADMIN C/O       8,893,833.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1960 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2471120      26404         
50434323050240460 SCM ROYAL PALM INVESTORS LLC & ATTN: JONATHAN SATTER       8,081,172.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1974 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4793330      21632         
50434323050240470 SCM ROYAL PALM INVESTORS LLC & ATTN: JONATHAN SATTER       12,000,000.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1968 2000 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6919210      25776         
50434323050240480 THREE NINETY SIX LTD PRTNRSHP ATTN: REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS       4,452,710.00 0.46 FINANCIAL           1997 1997 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1250010       7870         
50434323050250011 BRADEN JAMES B & BRADEN KIRSTEN W       1,088,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 2      45690        590        596        576                 
50434323050250011 BRADEN JAMES B & BRADEN KIRSTEN W       1,088,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 02 00 2     144795       1788       1872       1752                 
50434323050250012 KASPER CYNTHIA        834,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 00 02 00 1      37548        486        577        273                 
50434323050250012 KASPER CYNTHIA        834,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1990 00 02 01 2     244563       2131       2295       2060                 
50434323050250013 FRANKEL FRANK        2,123,085.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1991 00 04 00 2     533635       3928       4088       3848                 
50434323050250013 FRANKEL FRANK        2,123,085.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 1      37271        483        686        288                 
50434323050250021 MATTHEWS JACK &        2,684,245.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 05 06 01 2    1106710       4193       4478       3806                 
50434323050250022 MURDOCK LINTON F & NANCY W MURDOCK NANCY W       887,016.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 06 06 01 2    1106710       4193       4478       3806                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1965 00 01 00 2       2887        669        682        664                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1975 00 02 00 2       9830       2408       2458       2332                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1975 01 03 01 2       9266       2043       2072       2030                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1959 1965 00 02 00 1       2560        744        756        741                 
50434323050250050 215 BRAZILIAN HOLDING LLC        3,000,000.00 0 VACANT COMM                           
50434323050250061 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS        350.00 0.06 VACANT COMM                           
50434323050250071 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS        2,086,525.00 0 STORES           1935 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     372780       4729         
50434323050250072 THIRTY SIXTY SOUTH OCEAN INC        1,826,560.00 0 STORES           1945 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     166200       3630         
50434323050250072 THIRTY SIXTY SOUTH OCEAN INC        1,826,560.00 0 STORES           1945 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     220360       4539         
50434323050250351 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS CAMPANIELLO IMPORTS LTD C/O       3,381,293.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1130490      16885         
50434323050250352 MILTON PARTNERSHIP LTD LESLIE C FELDMAN C/O       1,283,510.00 0 STORES           1925 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     262710       4700         
50434323050250361 BNB VENTURES PALM BEACH I LLC LEONARD I ACKERMAN C/O       2,070,531.00 0 VACANT COMM           1924 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     109750       7291         
50434323050250370 BROADWAY RPW REV STAT TRUST        5,144,749.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1946 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1941350      12446         
50434323050250380 BESSEMER BUILDING CORP        5,496,917.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1989 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2514340      11694         
50434323050250390 FJK PROP INC        6,534,708.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1957 2007 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    3325640      19242         
50434323050250400 F J K III PROP INC        4,740,951.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1950 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1535590      10296         
50434323050250411 NHM REALTY LLC        8,289,320.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1975 1980 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    5011850      23998         
50434323050260081 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       2,650,000.00 0 STORES           1950 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     566660       8464         
50434323050260082 BESSENROTH MARGRIT        1,473,130.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     204030       2616         
50434323050260082 BESSENROTH MARGRIT        1,473,130.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     424880       5586         
50434323050260090 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       2,182,114.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323050260101 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       1,000,000.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323050260102 DORRIS VIVIAN P TRUSTEE DORRIS VIVIAN P TRUST       1,182,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1985 00 03 01 2     164560       5282       6608       3735                 
50434323050260110 ROGER KENT INVESTMENTS INC RUG DOCTON C/O       3,606,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     162504       2502       3124       1932                 
50434323050260110 ROGER KENT INVESTMENTS INC RUG DOCTON C/O       3,606,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 01 2     197906       2957       3008       2839                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      22417        270        338        169                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      62016        768        960        480                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 01 2     471173       4776       5062       4670                 
50434323050260130 BOURNE INVESTMENTS INC        4,306,094.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1995 04 03 01 1    1055141       4681       5189       4082                 
50434323050260140 BAGBY JOSEPH R & MARTHA G BAGBY MARTHA G       804,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1941 02 01 00 1      42891        593        780        546                 
50434323050260140 BAGBY JOSEPH R & MARTHA G BAGBY MARTHA G       804,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 04 03 01 2     310367       3728       4233       3144                 
50434323050260151 THREE HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN        2,372,760.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050260310 ROYAL 160 LLC        14,000,000.00 1.38 MOTEL           1996 2000 0030 01 3 FIRE PROOF    9454140      54038         
50434323050260340 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       5,408,512.00 0 FINANCIAL           1971 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2204480      19500         
50434323050260600 ROLAND ASSOC I LTD FELLERS SCHEWE ET AL INC C/O       5,618,613.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2413010      13846         
50434323050270011 CARALEX REALTY CO LLC        3,466,664.00 0.43 SERV STATIONS           1956 1974 0004 01 2 FIRE RESIS     206820       2248         
50434323050270012 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.5 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050270141 SKY TRUST TR HILDT DOROTHY TREMAINE       2,418,357.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2    1214209       4352       4735       3965                 
50434323050270142 HARRIS DOROTHY W        2,312,829.00 0.17 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2    1068255       4100       4504       3710                 
50434323050270280 336 PARTNERS INC        2,051,980.00 0 STORES           1928 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     681980       6252         
50434323050270300 332 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD        1,615,584.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1935 1955 0019 01 1 WOOD FRAME     244030       9402         
50434323050270320 R D OF PALM BEACH INC        3,526,800.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1471800      18796         
50434323050270330 336 PARTNERS INC        3,659,806.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1961 03 04 00 2       9406       2455       2878       2338                 
50434323050270371 REYNOLDS ROBERT L &        3,803,868.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2    1945574       4995       5636       4514                 
50434323050270372 WIGGINS SHARON & WIGGINS WILLIAM B JR       3,182,208.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1371462       4936       5680       4425                 
50434323050270401 GAINES STANLEY N GAINES GAY H       3,235,404.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2    1374217       4949       5618       4501                 
50434323050270402 JDO PALM BEACH LLC        3,791,643.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1930456       4959       5663       4503                 
50434323050280200 BURCH ROBERT L & RED BADGE INC C/O       4,144,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 00 03 01 2    1094614       6180       7178       5327                 
50434323050280211 ANGIULI NICK        841,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     163087       1302       1445        968                 
50434323050280211 ANGIULI NICK        841,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 00 03 01 3     734779       3722       3722       3722                 
50434323050280212 MCCARTHY THOMAS O        5,526,636.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    2171911       7615       8206       6940                 
50434323050280250 PAGLIARI RICHARD A        5,072,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 06 01 2    2169864       6251       7232       5693                 
50434323050280280 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       1,991,750.00 0 STORES                           
50434323050280290 331 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LLC GOLDNER LIDIA       4,585,764.00 0 STORES           1957 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1282490       9676         
50434323050280331 331 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LLC JOEL P KOEPPEL C/O       1,795,241.00 0 FINANCIAL           1959 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     423320       3105         
50434323050280351 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.54 MUNICIPAL           1986 1986 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3471090      18558         
50434323050280410 BRYANT ELIZABETH        490,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1965 00 04 00 2     136937       2277       2524       2188                 
50434323050280410 BRYANT ELIZABETH        490,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      78854       1293       1521        761                 
50434323050280421 HYPERION FARMS MYCFO INC C/O       2,086,985.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1980 04 03 00 1     203841       2813       3270       2504                 
50434323050280440 PIZZAGALLI JAMES C & PIZZAGALLI JUDITH R       3,495,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    1069110       5524       5929       5062                 
50434323050280460 PAMEL GREGORY J & PAMEL JAMES &       1,521,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1970 00 01 00 2      81098       1125       1440        540                 
50434323050280460 PAMEL GREGORY J & PAMEL JAMES &       1,521,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1980 00 01 01 2     168210       2043       2160       1936                 
50434323050280470 INDOE WILLIAM &        3,020,181.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    1120008       4099       4457       3667                 
50434323050280481 CHAMBERS JACK C CHAMBERS INGEBURG R       1,567,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1960 00 01 00 2      54026        658        794        360                 
50434323050280481 CHAMBERS JACK C CHAMBERS INGEBURG R       1,567,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1985 03 03 01 2     468934       5002       5465       4376                 
50434323050280510 STONE RICHARD L & LESLEY LESLEY STONE       577,173.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 01 00 2      61357        752        774        720                 
50434323050280510 STONE RICHARD L & LESLEY LESLEY STONE       577,173.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 00 03 00 2     406523       2994       3020       2976                 
50434323050280520 RSDL        1,604,114.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 00 2     126762       2268       2268       2268                 
50434323050280520 RSDL        1,604,114.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 00 03 01 2     209271       2691       3072       2511                 
50434323060000010 ANDRESEN KARL HEINZ & TAURUS INVEST HOLDINGS C/O..L.G KASSOF       10,024,877.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 04 01 2    2590686       7039       7919       6468                 
50434323060000010 ANDRESEN KARL HEINZ & TAURUS INVEST HOLDINGS C/O..L.G KASSOF       10,024,877.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 01 01 2     383307       2297       2928       1980                 
50434323060000021 MCFARLANE CATHLEEN        4,317,018.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 04 04 00 2    1521902       7465       7620       7416                 
50434323060000021 MCFARLANE CATHLEEN        4,317,018.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 00 03 01 1      73129        573        632        436                 
50434323060000040 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,422,467.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 00 01 00 1      21932        245        326          1                 
50434323060000040 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,422,467.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 04 03 01 3    1362922       4093       4252       3756                 
50434323070000010 HANNON KEVIN S        1,011,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1967   2070    1011150 
50434323070000020 BROD JOHN & BROD LISBETH       850,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1009050 
50434323070000030 GERRITY EDWARD J JR        1,270,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1270500 
50434323070000040 REYNOLDS JANET R TR        1,205,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1205400 
50434323070000050 MERCER DALE T        1,083,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1270500 
50434323070000060 ASTIC JOANNA        310,307.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1009050 
50434323070000070 REMMERT ELIZABETH D ELIZABETH REMMERT TR TITL HLDR       752,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     940800 
50434323070000080 LONG ROBERT E JR        1,029,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1029050 
50434323070000090 LONG ROBERT E JR        1,295,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1295500 
50434323070000100 SNL HOLDINGS LLC        1,230,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1230400 
50434323070000110 ROTH ROSE B        362,766.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1295500 
50434323070000120 REYNOLDS JANET R WILEY R REYNOLDS RESIDUARY TRUST       319,603.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1029050 
50434323070000130 VALENTINE EUGENE M VALENTINE E MASSIE JR &       960,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     960800 
50434323070000140 RUBIN SHIRLEY        1,049,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1049050 
50434323070000150 CROSSMAN CRAIG        1,320,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1320500 
50434323070000160 FINCH MEREDITH K        362,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1255400 
50434323070000170 FINCH MEREDITH K        372,560.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1320500 
50434323070000180 MILLER ANNE C        1,049,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1049050 
50434323070000190 SCHMERTZ HERBERT        930,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     980800 
50434323070000200 HALLOCK BERT        338,194.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1069050 
50434323070000210 ELMORE WILLIAM E JR & ELMORE BRENT W       955,866.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1345500 
50434323070000220 WARWICK CHARLES H III & WARWICK ELSIE C       788,874.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1280400 
50434323070000230 MOORE STARR        1,345,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1345500 
50434323070000240 ARMFIELD WILLIAM J IV & JANE H        1,069,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1069050 
50434323070000250 ARMFIELD IV WILLIAM J        1,000,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1000800 
50434323070000260 MANESS CAROLYN J TR        1,657,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1657950 
50434323070000270 FISHMAN IRVING        793,813.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1657950 
50434323070000280 MARSTON HELGA M TRUST MARSTON HELGA TR       1,440,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1440600 
50434323070000290 GAYNOR SUSAN & GAYNOR VERE W       1,234,410.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1440600 
50434323070000300 WARWICK CHARLES H III & WARWICK ELSIE C       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1967    333      89250 
50434323070000310 MOORE STARR        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1967    268      89250 
50434323070000320 MARSTON HELGA M TRUST MARSTON HELGA TR       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1967    317      89250 
50434323070000330 ARMFIELD W J IV & JANE H        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1967    317      89250 
50434323080000010 GUENTHER FREDERICK R TRUST & LIPPINCOTT VIRGINIA G TR       536,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     534450 
50434323080000020 DUSAULT ALLEN J TRUST DUSAULT ELLEN F TR       535,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     534450 
50434323080000030 CURRY JOHN F III &        480,347.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000040 WILLIAMS NANCY J        479,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000050 GILLIGAN VIRGINIA K GILLIGAN VIRGINIA K TR       90,149.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000060 STONEHOUSE ROBERT W        539,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000070 NASTASIC PREDRAG TRUST & NASTASIC VIDOSAVA TRUST       544,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000080 MUNRO ALLISON MUNRO ALLISON TR       90,649.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000090 RUTHERFURD EDWARD C & EDWARD C RUTHERFORD TR TITL HLDR       322,986.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000100 CLECKNER ELIZABETH M        322,986.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323100000011 BRADWAY RUBY W        410,218.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1630650 
50434323100000012 CRAIG CHARLES S        933,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1416450 
50434323100000013 LA VOY KENNETH R JR &        1,712,330.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1969   4142    1843800 
50434323100000014 VASILY JOHN M & VASILY MEDINA S       915,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1969   2107     915600 
50434323100000015 HOFFER NATASHA I        438,841.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1969   1104     610050 
50434323100000016 RUTHERFURD ELIZABETH K RUTHERFURD ELIZABETH K TR       792,752.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0016 0400 CONDO 1969   2123     932400 
50434323100000017 MINSKY SYLVIA        384,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1139250 
50434323100000018 BOWDEN ELIZABETH M        1,612,169.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0018 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1788150 
50434323100000019 GERBETH JOHN        301,717.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0019 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1573950 
50434323100000021 MCKENNA PAUL J        923,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1041600 
50434323100000022 FERGUSON JOHN M & EUBANKS WILLIAM R       991,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1969   2097     991200 
50434323100000023 LIST THOMAS & BARBARA LIST BARBARA       185,763.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1058400 
50434323100000024 MARA ANN T        1,265,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1265250 
50434323100000025 POLZIN NANCY DOUGLAS EST        437,290.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1808150 
50434323100000026 MC CLOSKEY MARGERY        766,048.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1593950 
50434323100000027 BURTCH DEAN C & BURTCH CLARE V D       1,005,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0027 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1127750 
50434323100000028 HALPER HARRY A & SYLVIA S SYLVIA S HALPER       297,434.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0028 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1061600 
50434323100000029 OBRIEN TERRENCE P &        896,570.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0029 0400 CONDO 1969   2097    1011200 
50434323100000030 DUDLEY HENRY A &        1,078,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1078400 
50434323100000031 TELL WILLIAM K        1,285,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1285250 
50434323100000032 LYONS J PETER        883,604.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1828150 
50434323100000033 CONDRON P KEVIN & CONDRON CLARE K       1,613,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1613950 
50434323100000034 BAUMAN JAMES J        1,147,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1147750 
50434323100000035 GRAY HORACE A III & GRAY ELIZABETH       1,081,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1081600 
50434323100000036 KELLEY RUSSELL P JR        599,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1969   2097    1031200 
50434323100000037 REVSON MARTIN &        1,646,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0037 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1646400 
50434323100000038 MUSCARELLE JOSEPH L JR & MUSCARELLE SHARON M       1,305,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0038 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1305250 
50434323100000039 DEEMS RICHARD E & JEAN S        1,848,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0039 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1848150 
50434323100000040 PANTALONE IRENE        1,531,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1633950 
50434323100000041 AMOROSO JOAN M TR        1,167,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1167750 
50434323100000042 BALZEKAS STANLEY        1,101,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1101600 
50434323100000043 KOCH JOHN D & KOCH GIULIANA C       1,747,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1969   4220    1923600 
50434323100000045 CRAWFORD WILLIAM W & SANDRA K CRAWFORD SANDRA K       429,836.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1325250 
50434323100000046 HIGGINS JAMES F        3,710,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1969   2870    3710700 
50434323100000047 COLLINS JOHN T        1,958,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0047 0400 CONDO 1969   2243    1958250 
50434323100000048 MADDEN PETER E        1,493,052.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0048 0400 CONDO 1969   1941    1958250 
50434323100000049 SWAN THOMAS J JR & CARROLL D        2,926,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0049 0400 CONDO 1969   2728    2926350 
50434323110000010 MOULTON ROBERT M & MOULTON DEBORAH A       368,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1970    864     368550 
50434323110000020 CAMPBELL DAWN A        109,786.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000030 GREZELL MARGARITA        178,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1970    481     248850 
50434323110000040 MAXSON KELLI        59,243.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000050 BENTLEY GRETCHEN        278,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000060 SMITH HILLEN J JR        368,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1970    864     368550 
50434323110000070 SCHOONMAKER ELLA B        352,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1970    864     352800 
50434323110000080 HAAS ROBERTA TR        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000090 NESTORA VERONICA        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000100 HEWITT SARA M        178,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1970    481     233100 
50434323110000110 GURCIULLO ANDREA        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000120 FORTE PATRICK A        275,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1970    864     352800 
50434323110000130 PRYOR LUIS C & JOANNA J PRYOR JOANNA J       88,215.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1970    864     373550 
50434323110000140 FOX SEYMOUR        333,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000150 BOLAND THOMAS P        253,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1970    481     253850 
50434323110000160 ANGLE RAY A & J CHRISTIAN ANGLE H/W       53,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000170 RICHARDSON GARY C        333,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000180 MURPHY JAMES J        373,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1970    864     373550 
50434323110000190 KREITSEK WILLIAM A SR & KREITSEK DOLORES       357,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1970    864     357800 
50434323110000200 LESHER JAMES B        317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000210 BISHOP SUSAN        317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000220 BURNS FRANCES C        238,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1970    481     238100 
50434323110000230 WELSH CHARLES N III & YOUNG CARLA W       317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000240 HARDING JACQUELINE K        357,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1970    864     357800 
50434323110000250 DONAHUE JAMES B & LINDA P DONAHUE       598,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     594300 
50434323110000260 LANGE GLORIA P LANGE GLORIA P TR       532,980.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     594300 
50434323110000270 BRADLEY WILLIAM W        576,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     573300 
50434323110000280 FRANZKE VOLKER TERRANCE        576,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     573300 
50434323120000012 SHOOR BETTE G        275,683.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1014300 
50434323120000013 EDELMAN RICHARD M        2,400,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2400300 
50434323120000014 FLEISCHER RUTH J FLEISCHER JACK       627,421.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2400300 
50434323120000015 INTERNATIONAL ANTIQUES OF BAHAMAS        1,126,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1126650 
50434323120000017 ALTON HOWARD R JR & ALTON CAMILLA A       911,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1977   1250     911400 
50434323120000021 ETELMAN ETHEL        426,368.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    1961400 
50434323120000022 JAFFE SUSAN O W        1,250,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1250550 
50434323120000023 GRAHAM JOHN K TRUSTEE CROSBY ADVISORS C/O       2,977,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2977800 
50434323120000024 DASILVA WILLARD H & FRANCES A        2,977,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2977800 
50434323120000025 MILSTEIN RICHARD & JORDAN S RUBOY       1,362,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1362900 
50434323120000026 REMMERT ELIZABETH D REMMERT ELIZABETH D TR       2,285,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2285850 
50434323120000031 CLIFFORD STEWART B TRUST CLIFFORD STEWART B TR       1,986,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    1986400 
50434323120000032 COOLEY DAVID L & CHRISTINE        1,275,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1275550 
50434323120000033 COCOZIELLO SUSAN        3,027,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3027800 
50434323120000034 BAKER JON & BAKER PATRICIA       3,027,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3027800 
50434323120000035 MARTIG JOHN A III        1,387,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1387900 
50434323120000036 HANCOCK WILLIAM G CATHCART MONOMOY REALTY TRUST       2,260,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2310850 
50434323120000041 HIRST NANCY M TRUST HIRST BUSINESS OFFICE C/O       2,011,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2011400 
50434323120000042 MARINO JOSEPHINE        722,070.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1275550 
50434323120000043 SELTZER GLORIA        687,481.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3077800 
50434323120000044 DE LACAM JUDITH DE LACAM ALAIN       2,510,580.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3077800 
50434323120000045 LANASHEL HLDG LTD        1,412,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1412900 
50434323120000046 ROCCA LEONORA W LEONORA W ROCCA TR TI HLDR       514,497.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2335850 
50434323120000051 BIVINS OLIVER W & BIVINS LORNA M       2,073,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2073750 
50434323120000052 GRIFFITH J BRAD GRIFFITH PATRICIA       1,366,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1366050 
50434323120000053 BIRKENFELD RICHARD & BIRKENFELD RUTH       3,200,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3200400 
50434323120000054 ALTON HOWARD R JR & ALTON CAMILLA A       2,587,830.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3200400 
50434323120000055 BERGER E EDITH BERGER E EDITH TR       380,177.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1478400 
50434323120000056 CHIOTELLIS P N & LAVINIA        2,299,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2299500 
50434323140001010 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A        294,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1010 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140001020 DUPONT WILLIS H        1,004,151.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1020 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140001030 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A        234,176.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1030 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002010 BAGATELLE COMMERCIAL LLC        600,876.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2010 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002020 METTLER PETER W        466,926.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2020 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002030 PALM BEACH BOARD OF REALTORS INC        391,876.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2030 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002040 DUPONT WILLIS H        756,676.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2040 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002050 PALM BEACH BOARD OF REALTORS INC        1,016,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2050 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002060 SANCHEZ & MADDUX INC        826,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2060 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323260000000 THREE HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965      0        125 
50434323260001010 CROVO CHARLES R II        1,191,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1191750 
50434323260001020 HAWKWORTH TRUST HOROWITZ ELIZABETH J TR &       1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1001700 
50434323260001030 CARTER JOHN M TRUST        1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1001700 
50434323260001040 DOFFERMYRE MARY BROWN LOW        1,181,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1181250 
50434323260001050 GRZEBIEN JOHN & GRZEBIEN CHARLOTTE       575,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     575400 
50434323260001060 MCGINNESS NEIL        575,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     575400 
50434323260001070 HUSSEY LEO J & HUSSEY SUSAN E       585,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     585900 
50434323260001080 VAN DURAND ANN        260,872.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607950 
50434323260002010 KINLIN ROBERT & KINLIN ELLEN       1,216,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1216750 
50434323260002020 FOSTER JAMES C & FOSTER AUDREY S       1,802,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2B 0510 CO-OP 1965   3602    1802850 
50434323260002040 MCGINNESS NEIL        361,321.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1206250 
50434323260002050 LEE FRANK W JR & LEE MARY I       597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002060 MORGAN VIRGINIA        597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002070 MULLEN DORAN        597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002080 SCHMITZ RENATE        617,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617950 
50434323260003010 COLLINS CAROL O        237,863.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1241750 
50434323260003020 COLLINS CAROL O TR        1,051,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1051700 
50434323260003030 ANDERSON STANTON D        1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1051700 
50434323260003040 GRANT PATRICIA J TRUST &        1,231,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1231250 
50434323260003050 DE MELLO MARIE & JOHN DE MELLO JR       56,265.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003060 ROEMMELE HERBERT A        607,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003070 DRESNER MILTON H        306,844.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003080 SMITH WALTER E JR WALTER E SMITH JR TR TITL HLDR       426,890.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627950 
50434323260004010 PERIALE MARY E        238,748.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1266750 
50434323260004020 IMPERIAL MOIRA T & GRONBERG TARA I       1,076,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1076700 
50434323260004030 FARIS GEORGE N        1,076,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1076700 
50434323260004040 MORGAN VIRGINIA E        840,436.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1256250 
50434323260004050 RYAN JOHN J & RYAN MARY A       397,020.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004060 MATTIE BETTY J TR        261,372.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004070 GOWDY GERALDINE O        617,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004080 EKSTRACT EILEEN        637,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     637950 
50434323260005010 MCLENDON JOYCE W        238,748.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1291750 
50434323260005020 CLARKE ROSALIND        1,051,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1101700 
50434323260005030 MAHER THOMAS D JR & MAHER YVONNE B       1,101,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1101700 
50434323260005040 LIGHTHIZER ROBERT E        1,281,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1281250 
50434323260005050 KRENER ROBERT J. TR        627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005060 PAULINO BEN & PAULINO MARY       627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005070 LENNON HUGH & JANICE H        627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005080 PARKS DOROTHY B        283,774.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     647950 
50434323260006010 HALL ANDREW J        1,855,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHA 0510 CO-OP 1965   2565    1855350 
50434323260006020 SLATER SUSAN H BISHOP        1,048,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHB 0510 CO-OP 1965   1466    1048950 
50434323260006030 WALSH MICHAEL & WALSH HELEN       1,464,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   2093    1514100 
50434323260006040 HALL ANDREW &        990,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHD 0510 CO-OP 1965   2093     990150 
50434323260006050 POWELL SARA D        277,511.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHE 0510 CO-OP 1965   2093    1003800 
50434326000010010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.03 MUNICIPAL                           
50434326000010040 EXTOR E & MARY J        882,381.00 0.09 MFR <10 UNITS           1930 1955 0006 01 1 WOOD FRAME      70860       2656         
50434326000010050 EXTOR MARY J        367,687.00 0.07 MFR <10 UNITS 1930 1930 00 02 00 2      64535       1563       1651       1434                 
50434326000010070 CH VILLAS LLC &        400,000.00 0.19 MOTEL                           
50434326000010080 COLONY HOTEL INC        7,000,000.00 1.05 MOTEL           1947 1990 0083 01 2 FIRE RESIS    6020220      64592         
50434326000010080 COLONY HOTEL INC        7,000,000.00 1.05 MOTEL           1994 1994 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     770550       7146         
50434326000010160 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434326000010170 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1981 1981 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      67040       1020         
50434326020000010 DRAIME CECILE M DRAIME DAVID M TR       4,993,391.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    2712269       4903       5320       4395                 
50434326020000020 JAMES DANIEL H & SYLVIA JAMES SYLVIA       782,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 04 05 01 2     425412       4149       4838       2985                 
50434326020000031 CINQUE GAY ANN & CINQUE ALFRED J       776,989.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 01 01 00 1      68297       1166       1320       1128                 
50434326020000031 CINQUE GAY ANN & CINQUE ALFRED J       776,989.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 03 04 00 2     310924       2928       3219       2670                 
50434326020000040 ANTONINI PENELOPE F & ANTONINI MARION H       2,961,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 00 01 00 1      20453        258        289        245                 
50434326020000040 ANTONINI PENELOPE F & ANTONINI MARION H       2,961,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 00 03 01 3     891071       4286       4480       3808                 
50434326020000050 VANDERPOEL BARRIE OSBORN VANDERPOEL BARRIE OSBORN TR       4,248,768.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 06 09 01 2    1774583      10481      10772      10044                 
50434326020000070 GEYER ELLEN        1,728,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 04 05 01 3    1078537       6592       6908       6225                 
50434326020000091 GOLFVIEW HOLDINGS LLC        2,331,638.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 05 01 2     918796       5441       5737       4961                 
50434326020000092 JAMES WILLIAM E & WILLIAM E JAMES TR TITL HLDR       3,483,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1980 01 02 00 1      60514        550        550        550                 
50434326020000092 JAMES WILLIAM E & WILLIAM E JAMES TR TITL HLDR       3,483,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 04 05 00 2    1716016       5191       5825       4505                 
50434326020000110 WHELTON JOHN C & MAHNAZ WHELTON MAHNAZ       1,892,720.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 07 00 2    2084961       8311       9109       7594                 
50434326020000121 BAILEY IRVING W II        5,789,769.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 04 05 01 2    4713431       7932       8674       7422                 
50434326020000141 GRAEBNER CLARK E & GRAEBNER PATRICIA       3,604,957.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1986 04 06 01 2    2064544       5601       6057       5511                 
50434326020000142 BUTLER FRANK O II        1,442,112.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 3    1200354       6643       7066       5654                 
50434326020000160 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        25,140.00 0 GOLF COURSE                           
50434326050000030 LINDSAY CHARLES J & LINDSAY FERN M       2,395,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1970   3883    2445450 
50434326050001180 KELLER FRED TR        1,942,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1180 0400 CONDO 1970   3218    1942500 
50434326050001200 KUDMAN IRWIN        263,865.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1139250 
50434326050001210 LEED PAULA        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     912450 
50434326050001220 LEED PAULA B        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     912450 
50434326050002180 KITTREDGE EDWARD        1,163,564.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1970   3216    1916250 
50434326050002200 SILBERSTEIN RUTH        1,149,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1149250 
50434326050002210 THOMAS MARION S TRUST        917,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     917450 
50434326050002220 FIORITA VAL & MALINDA        917,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     917450 
50434326050003010 NECO LUIS M & F RUTH NECO F RUTH       147,401.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624     937650 
50434326050003020 FITERMAN DE LORIS J        1,050,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1050000 
50434326050003030 FRIEDMAN RAYMOND WINTHROP HOUSE C/O       311,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1970   2375    1352400 
50434326050003040 GINN FLORENCE L        686,914.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1025850 
50434326050003050 HERRICK L ALLAN &        1,093,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1970   1669    1093050 
50434326050003060 MILLER STEPHEN C & MILLER BARBARA G       193,345.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1054200 
50434326050003070 CARDO RANDY & CARDO BEVERLY       1,054,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1054200 
50434326050003080 STRAUSS CAROL K & STRAUSS PETER       1,346,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1346100 
50434326050003090 FIG TREE II PARTNERS CHARLES RYAN HICKMAN C/O       2,507,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2507400 
50434326050003100 MARCANTONIO MARY M        1,504,270.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1660050 
50434326050003110 BLONDER DOROTHY ALTSCHUL KAREN B TR       326,292.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1970   2137    1377600 
50434326050003120 PAGE MICHAEL F &        654,199.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2202900 
50434326050003140 GARVEY JOHN K TRUST GARVEY JOHN K TRUSTEE       1,660,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1660050 
50434326050003150 THREE 15 WORTH INC J KERZNER C/O       1,377,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1970   2137    1377600 
50434326050003160 MANNING JOHN P        1,842,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1842750 
50434326050003170 EPSTEIN ROBERT TR & STEDMAN BARBARA S TR       1,397,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1397550 
50434326050003180 DAVID E MORGAN INC        1,058,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3180 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1058400 
50434326050003190 SCHOENFELD LORI &        1,058,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3190 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1058400 
50434326050003200 JONES DAVID L &        158,435.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1159250 
50434326050003210 ONEIL ALTON J        345,971.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3210 0400 CONDO 1970   3159    1659000 
50434326050004010 BENDERMAN MAYA        529,607.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624     942650 
50434326050004020 VIGILANTE ANTOINETTE &        140,784.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1065000 
50434326050004030 ROTTMAN JOY ANN & MILTON & JOY ANN ROTTMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       425,323.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1452150 
50434326050004040 GAYNIN JONATHAN S        1,040,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1040850 
50434326050004050 INDUSTRIAL AMERICA INC  MICHAEL F PAGE C/O       1,452,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1452150 
50434326050004060 KARTIGANER NORMAN & PATRICIA KARTIGANER PATRICIA       197,759.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1069200 
50434326050004070 SCHWARTZ MILTON        1,069,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1069200 
50434326050004080 PAGE MICHAEL F & JOAN R        1,366,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1366100 
50434326050004090 ADAMS PHYLLIS S EST MARK W GROTE C/O       2,532,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2532400 
50434326050004100 MOSS BERENICE & MOSS MAGGI &       381,524.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1685050 
50434326050004110 CHANDLER JOSEPH        232,769.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004120 OMALLEY THOMAS D & OMALLEY MARY A       2,227,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2227900 
50434326050004130 CHESHIRE M BRENNAN        253,224.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004140 PAGE JOAN R V TR        1,685,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1685050 
50434326050004150 CALYPSO LLC        1,256,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004160 FISCHER CLIFFORD R & FISCHER GAIL C       1,867,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1867750 
50434326050004170 PHILPIT MARY PHILPIT JOHN R TR       355,811.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1417550 
50434326050004180 KLEEMAN CAROLA J WACHOVIA BANK-ATTN B GARCIA C/O       1,068,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1068400 
50434326050004190 MYERS BERNARD IAN & SANDRA HAN SPECIAL SERVICES DEPT C/O       1,068,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1068400 
50434326050004200 EVANS LAURA W        1,119,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1169250 
50434326050004210 CABARLE CORNELIUS & DOROTHY E CABARLE DOROTHY E       153,858.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     927450 
50434326050004220 SERETEAN SHERRY S        629,903.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     927450 
50434326050005010 STONEMAN JAMES M MORRISSEY ROBERT J       1,235,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1235850 
50434326050005020 CALDER MADELEINE J        511,143.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1080000 
50434326050005030 BURNS INGRID BURNS INGRID TR       425,091.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1462150 
50434326050005040 GENTILE FRANK A &        1,055,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1055850 
50434326050005050 MILLER HENRY & MILLER BARBARA       1,462,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1462150 
50434326050005060 STAVARIDIS FLORIDA REALTY TRUST STAVARIDIS PATRICIA A TR       1,084,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1084200 
50434326050005070 HIGGINS PATRICIA P        211,707.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1084200 
50434326050005080 QUINN DENICE D        781,878.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1386100 
50434326050005090 PAGE LUCILLE C PAGE LUCILLE C TR       2,255,140.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2557400 
50434326050005100 HIRSCH CAROLINE P        1,710,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1710050 
50434326050005110 FISHER JOHN & GOTTESMAN MERRILL F       238,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005120 MURRAY MAUREEN        2,252,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2252900 
50434326050005130 KOPLIK SALLY J TR        318,148.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005140 SONNIER JOSEPH A        1,133,116.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1710050 
50434326050005150 FIFTH AVENUE REALTY TRUST        1,266,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005160 BENEVENTO FRANK A II        297,795.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1892750 
50434326050005170 SANFORD BRUCE W & SANFORD MARILOU K       1,437,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1437550 
50434326050006010 WOOD WILLIAM B WILLIAM B WOOD TRUST       484,261.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1250850 
50434326050006020 BASS KIM DEBRA TR & BASS RICHARD C TR       1,045,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1095000 
50434326050006030 MASTERMAN EDWARD I & MASTERMAN SYDELL       1,472,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1472150 
50434326050006040 REDMON HERBERT J JR        1,070,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1070850 
50434326050006050 KAPLAN DOLORES K        1,472,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1472150 
50434326050006060 MOYNIHAN ROBERT E & KATHERINE        1,099,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1099200 
50434326050006070 COLE BARBARA H COLE BARBARA H TR       206,582.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1099200 
50434326050006080 PETROLEUM INC        1,406,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1406100 
50434326050006090 KAPLAN DOLORES K        2,582,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2582400 
50434326050006100 LYONS KAY G        1,735,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1735050 
50434326050006110 WISE ROBERT E & WISE YVONNE B       726,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006120 LAURANS SCOTT B        1,982,190.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2277900 
50434326050006130 STEELE JEAN        242,334.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006140 GRUDOVICH THOMAS & GRUDOVICH LINDA J       1,735,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1735050 
50434326050006150 PRUDDEN HORTON JR        1,276,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006160 GRUDOVICH THOMAS & GRUDOVICH LINDA J       1,917,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1917750 
50434326050006170 WILNER ZELDA D        1,457,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1457550 
50434326050007010 PETROLEUM INC        1,265,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1265850 
50434326050007020 ZMIJEWSKI LEONARD &        1,110,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1110000 
50434326050007030 DE BORCHGRAVE A & ALEXANDRA V        1,482,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1482150 
50434326050007040 CASTELO JOSEPH & CASTELO DONNA       1,853,650.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1970   3078    1903650 
50434326050007050 MURDOCK PATRICIA K        425,591.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1970   3078    1903650 
50434326050007070 FLUSFEDER JOSEPH        1,114,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1114200 
50434326050007080 VICTORIA DE LILLE INC        1,426,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1426100 
50434326050007090 SLATER SHIRLEY        2,306,640.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2607400 
50434326050007100 GLAZER CAROL J TRUST OF 1998 & GLAZER CAROL J TR       2,988,300.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1970   3595    2988300 
50434326050007110 KARLYN WILLIAM M & KARLYN ELIZABETH M       1,286,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1286850 
50434326050007130 ANDERSON DALE        1,240,543.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7130 0400 CONDO 1970   3180    2053800 
50434326050007140 GABELLI MARIO        1,760,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1760050 
50434326050007150 DOCTER ALAN K DOCTER MARCIA       1,286,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1286850 
50434326050007160 GABELLI MARIO & PITARO REGINA       1,942,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1942750 
50434326050007170 FRIEDHEIM EDITH H WINTHROP HOUSE C/O       1,477,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1477550 
50434326050007180 COYLE MARILYN & KAZEMINEY NASSER       1,298,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7180 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1298850 
50434326050007190 SELECMAN BARBARA A BARBARA A SELECMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       483,837.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7190 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1144500 
50434326050007200 STANVALE PROP LTD LEON UNTERHALTER ASSOCS C/O       1,504,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7200 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1504650 
50434326050007210 BRONSTIEN EDWARD L JR        1,120,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7210 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1120350 
50434326050007220 DOZOR SHIRLEY W DOZOR SHIRLEY W TR       406,873.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7220 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1504650 
50434326050007230 JANSSEN EILEEN F REVOCABLE TRUST JANSSEN EILEEN F TRUSTEE       1,148,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7230 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1148700 
50434326050007240 WELLS RICHARD E & GLORIA D        1,148,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7240 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1148700 
50434326050007260 SHARF JEAN S TR & LEON UNTERHALTER ASSOCS C/O       3,033,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7260 0400 CONDO 1970   3730    3033450 
50434326050007270 MCCREADY RICHARD E        1,220,109.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7270 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1817550 
50434326050007280 FRIEDLAND MELVIN        1,309,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7280 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1309350 
50434326050007290 WARSHAW HOWARD & MIRIAM        2,412,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7290 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2412900 
50434326050007310 CORNSTEIN SHEILA        1,817,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7310 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1817550 
50434326050007320 FRANKS STANLEY & FRANKS CHRISTINE A       684,749.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7320 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1309350 
50434326050007330 DE BARDELEBEN PRINCE JR & ANNE        2,000,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7330 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    2000250 
50434326050007340 BLOYS DAVID & BLOYS SENIE       1,444,530.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7340 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1523550 
50434326060091010 KERTESS HANS W        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091020 CAROLAN RICHARD F 2001 TRUST        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091030 KAMPEL DANIEL S & KAMPEL LAURA G       1,568,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1568700 
50434326060091040 CASEY IRENE D        268,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091050 WILLIAMSON G T & PATRICIA J        1,438,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091060 BLAIR CLAUDE M & ROSE V BLAIR ROSE V       253,436.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091070 OBSER HERIBERT &        1,438,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091080 REHNERT BERNADETTE T        1,568,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1568700 
50434326060091090 LUCCHETTI RAYMOND        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091100 HIMMELSTEIN MARC & AYCOCK PAMELA       1,084,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060092010 WALDIN ERIK        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 201N 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092020 KREINDLER ELLEN C        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 202N 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092030 BLOMEYER STEPHANIE S        1,531,113.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2195550 
50434326060092050 SOUTH OCEAN LLC        2,195,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2195550 
50434326060092070 AWL LLC        1,573,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1573950 
50434326060092080 S & S LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HERBERT J STERN C/O       1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092090 LICKLE GARRISON D        290,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092100 FRANKENHOFF JILL H        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092110 GIBBONS MICHAEL J ESTEE LAUDER CO C/O       931,159.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092120 KEAN JOHN C        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092130 L ESPERANCE FAMILY CORP        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2130 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092140 FERRARA RALPH C & FERRARA BARBARA N       1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092150 WALDIN ERIK        1,418,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092160 RAIMONDO ROBERT C        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092170 KLEINBERG DAVID        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092180 SULLIVAN KEVIN C        1,523,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1573950 
50434326060092190 HERBERT J GERALD SR FAM TRUST # V        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2190 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092200 NORDBACK CLARE A DONALD SCOTT C/O       417,486.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092210 HILL EDWARD R & MARSHA E        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092220 LADD ROBERT T & LADD GEORGIANA B       1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092230 BURRUS PETER M & BURRUS ELIZABETH T       1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2230 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092240 WRIGHT RICHARD        1,169,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2240 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1219050 
50434326060094010 PRICE GORDON W & PRICE BARBARA       1,239,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1239050 
50434326060094020 GILBANE SARAH B GILBANE ROBERT V       812,326.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094030 GARDINER NANCY T        812,326.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094040 PRAY NATALIE THOMAS        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094050 KORNEGAY BRYAN B JR & KORNEGAY CORISA C       1,178,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094060 GALLO DENNIS        606,262.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094070 BAIRD ELIZABETH G        1,593,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1593950 
50434326060094080 BEASLEY JANE        1,005,887.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094090 RICCOBENE MARY MELLON BANK NA TR &       1,005,887.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094100 MCDONOUGH RICOBENE MARY TRUST MCCUSKER FRANCIS C TR       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094110 FREE JAMES C & FREE ANN TODD       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094120 DODGE JOHN B        1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094130 BROUGHER NANCY M & BROUGHER W DALE       2,533,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2633400 
50434326060094150 400 S OCEAN II LLC & 400 S OCEAN I LLC       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094160 400 S OCEAN II LLC & 400 S OCEAN I LLC       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 416E 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094170 MARROCCO ANTHONY TR        1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094180 GAMMINO ELIZABETH K GAMMINO ELIZABETH K TR       1,593,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1593950 
50434326060094190 JONES JANIS        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094200 SWEET ROBERT H EST        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094210 ROE RANDALL B        632,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1965   1095     632100 
50434326060094220 LEAMER LAURENCE & VESNA VESNA LEAMER       210,337.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094230 HANSEN JULIA S        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4230 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094240 DEANGELIS MARJORIE        1,239,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4240 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1239050 
50434326060095010 HOULIHAN JAMES G & MARY M HOULIHAN TRS       1,982,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1965   1940    1982400 
50434326060095020 POLLARD CORNELIA B        773,945.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1965   2156    2087400 
50434326060095030 PBI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ALAN MENKES C/O       2,634,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1965   2376    2634450 
50434326060095040 TOSI DYANNE C        893,259.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1965   2749    2937900 
50434326060095060 SWAN DENISE G        1,525,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1965   2376    2655450 
50434326070001010 WINN GAIL A        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1973   1590     571200 
50434326070001020 RUPERT JAIME A        352,347.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1973   1275     466200 
50434326070002010 KRISHNAN SANKAR & KRISHNAN SUSAN       487,622.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     643650 
50434326070002020 WIKSTROM SIEGLINDE        559,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002030 VANBUREN CYNTHIA        212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002040 SAVINA WILLIAM SAVINA VIRGINIA       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002050 MAHLER WOLF PETER MAHLER WOLF PETER TR       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     643650 
50434326070003010 ALLEN NORMA W        199,375.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003020 DEMPSEY PATRICIA C        212,462.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003030 ANGELINI PATRICIA A        569,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003040 DAY DAVID J        519,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003050 RIKER HARLAND A & RIKER ANN M       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     653650 
50434326080000021 KRAMER CHARLOTTE R TR HALLE BLDG C/O       3,613,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3613050 
50434326080000022 BENENSON GLADYS        3,438,110.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3556350 
50434326080000023 STRAUSS HAROLD E & STRAUSS MARLENE       2,638,108.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3556350 
50434326080000024 MORRISSEY JAMES F & KAY M KAY M MORRISSEY       1,582,880.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3613050 
50434326080000031 COLLINS KEVIN J SHEEHAN ROBERT W TR       1,968,016.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3813050 
50434326080000032 ASHTON HARRIS & ASHTON ANGELA       2,862,118.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3756350 
50434326080000033 SPRING CORP TRANSOCEANIC CORP C/O       3,756,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3756350 
50434326080000034 DUNGAN RAYMOND E & LEO SADE & DAVID HORNSTEIN       3,813,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3813050 
50434326080000041 NIELSEN BARBARA H        3,810,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4013050 
50434326080000042 POLOZKER BRUCE W POLOZKER BRUCE W TR       2,404,309.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3956350 
50434326080000043 OURISMAN MARY M        3,086,126.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3956350 
50434326080000044 MANNING JAMES P MANNING JAMES P TR       3,810,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4013050 
50434326080000051 DOCTER ALAN K & DOCTER MARCIA       2,696,488.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4213050 
50434326080000052 AMAR LEON & CHARLOTTE D IGOE-AMAR H/W       1,260,329.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4156350 
50434326080000053 MANDEL JOSEPH C MANDEL MORTON L TR       2,273,715.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4156350 
50434326080000054 BUCKLEY CAROLYN E        4,027,835.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4213050 
50434326080000061 YOUNG MARGARET TRUSTEE        1,332,401.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4413050 
50434326080000062 GERSHWIND MARJORIE        4,356,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4356350 
50434326080000063 BON DURANT ISABELLE H ISABELL H BON DURANT TR TITL       1,331,901.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4356350 
50434326080000064 KRAUS VALERIE        4,413,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4413050 
50434326090000010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       266,149.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974    847     266149 
50434326090000020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       257,192.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974    824     257192 
50434326090001010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090001020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090001030 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090001040 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090002010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090002020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090002030 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090002040 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326100001010 DUNLAP NANCY S        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     571200 
50434326100001020 HEFFERNAN PAUL M & ROBERT, FINNEGAN  AND LYNCH C/O       1,038,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1038450 
50434326100001030 CARPENTER ROSEMARY G        1,017,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1017450 
50434326100001040 MAKLER BARRY M &        118,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1975    827     442050 
50434326100001050 INGLIS JAMES D        442,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1975    827     442050 
50434326100001060 CURRY BERNARD F        149,588.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     716100 
50434326100001070 MCCARTIN LAWRENCE M TR        695,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     695100 
50434326100001080 INFANTE CAROLYN M        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     571200 
50434326100002010 HIGGINS EDWARD T & HIGGINS KATHLEEN M       623,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     623700 
50434326100002020 SALTY AIR PROPERTIES INC GC CONSULTANTS INC C/O       1,143,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1143450 
50434326100002030 BLUNDIN WILLIAM B        670,189.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1122450 
50434326100002040 HATCH JAMES A & FRANCES N        644,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     644700 
50434326100002050 DIAZ MARIA A R        644,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     644700 
50434326100002060 THREE 50 HLDG INC ROYAL BK CANADA/L GENGE C/O       768,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     768600 
50434326100002070 FIRST PALM BEACH PROP INC        747,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     747600 
50434326100002080 KRANICH MICHAEL M SR        573,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     623700 
50434326100003010 ONEGLIA A GEORGE TR & TR DEPT, DAVID ONEGLIA TR C/O       648,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     648700 
50434326100003020 MARSCHEL GLENN W & MARSCHEL KAY E       1,193,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1193450 
50434326100003030 MORMORIS STEPHEN C        751,431.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1172450 
50434326100003040 SIEDLIK LAWRENCE E        336,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     669700 
50434326100003050 GROSS LOUIS II & PHYLLIS M GROSS PHYLLIS M       197,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     669700 
50434326100003060 ENGLERT PETER & ENGLERT NORMA       793,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     793600 
50434326100003070 PALM BEACH BUILDING SERVICES INC        772,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     772600 
50434326100003080 AMERICAN NATL BK & TRUST CO TR        648,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     648700 
50434326110000011 ALBRECHT PRISCILLA        486,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0011 0400 CONDO 1976   1189     536000 
50434326110000021 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        403,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0021 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000022 BENVENISTE EVANGELINE        581,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0022 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000023 BOWES WENDY L        403,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0023 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000024 SALERNO JEAN SALERNO JEAN TR       507,760.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0024 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000031 STEPHAN CAROLINA IZQUIERDO        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0031 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000032 DONNELLY PENELOPE E        225,058.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0032 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000033 GEORGITSIS IRO        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0033 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000034 GOFMAN ALEX &        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0034 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000041 VANDYCK LINDA A        145,445.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0041 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000042 ZOVKO MARY A & JAAP W HILBRAND       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0042 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000043 DESIMONE DANIEL P & STENBERG ALAN R       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0043 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000044 VAN DER HEIDE DOUGLAS & VAN DER HEIDE RUTH       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0044 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000051 HONEYSUCKLE HILL INVESTMENT CO        641,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0051 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000052 LEELANAU LAND LLC        641,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0052 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000053 WOOD PATRICIA M        570,060.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0053 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000054 JANSSEN EILEEN F        570,060.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0054 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000061 MERRIEN JEANNINE P MERRIEN FRANCOISE TR       340,895.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0061 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000062 KLINGER BARBARA J KLINGER BARBARA J TR       228,156.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0062 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000063 PETRY ANNE C & PETRY PAUL E       590,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0063 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000064 KESSELMAN MARK L & DE ANDRADE KESSELMAN E       661,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0064 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000071 WREN WINSTON D & WREN ALLISON K       326,648.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0071 0400 CONDO 1976   1403     913000 
50434326110000072 GUSMAN IRWIN J        783,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0072 0400 CONDO 1976   1360     833000 
50434326120000010 TOSI LAURENCE A III        229,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1976    618     229950 
50434326120000020 ABIUSO CHERYL        51,490.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1976    559     174300 
50434326120000030 SALERNO ROBERT M        225,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1976    604     225750 
50434326120000040 BAER NANCY        178,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1976    604     178500 
50434326120000050 MOESER RICHARD M        299,650.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1976   1044     349650 
50434326120000071 KAPPLER CHARLES E        274,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0071 0400 CONDO 1976    827     274050 
50434326120000090 HURLEY ARTHUR J JR & MARYBETH        270,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1976    930     270900 
50434326120000100 BECK SUZANNE        136,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1976    398     136500 
50434326120000110 CALARESO DONALD A & JUDITH A        164,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1976    461     164850 
50434326120000120 DIETZ HUGH T        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1976    357     120750 
50434326120000141 STOLL SUZANNE        274,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0141 0400 CONDO 1976    827     274050 
50434326120000160 SCHAEFER JOSEPH W & SCHAEFER SHAYNA YEERA &       216,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1976    930     266700 
50434326120000170 VKO INC        136,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1976    398     136500 
50434326120000180 SALERNO LAURA LPR PERUVIAN REALTY TRUST       431,620.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1976   2228     522900 
50434326130000021 HIGHT NELL W WACHOVIA BANK TR       2,615,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2615550 
50434326130000022 PONTON DANIEL E        1,661,973.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2200800 
50434326130000023 BROWN SAURINE L & SAURINE BROWN TR TITL HLDR       2,361,230.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2563050 
50434326130000031 BSJ LLC        2,665,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2665550 
50434326130000032 FINK MARJORIE S        1,243,153.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2250800 
50434326130000033 EHRLICH STEPHEN R & EHRLICH MARY       2,010,665.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2613050 
50434326130000041 LONG ROBERT E & LONG KATHRYN S       2,715,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2715550 
50434326130000042 DAFER INC        2,300,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2300800 
50434326130000043 MERIN ANDREW J & MERIN KENNETH S &       902,105.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2663050 
50434326130000051 LUBOW ELINOR C LUBOW ELINOR C TR       794,881.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2765550 
50434326130000052 MANSON WILLIAM J JR TR & MANSON ANNE T  TR       2,350,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2350800 
50434326130000053 PONTE VEDRA CORP INC RABIDEAU GUY C/O       2,713,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2713050 
50434326130000061 NICHOLSON JAMES &        2,815,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2815550 
50434326130000062 WINSTON BELLE R TR & WINSTON BELLE R TR &       966,966.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2400800 
50434326130000063 TAUBMAN JUDITH M        2,763,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2763050 
50434326140000010 LOVE GALLERY PLACE LOVE REALTY C/O       4,150,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326140000020 LOVE GALLERY PLACE LOVE REALTY C/O       2,100,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326140000030 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD        1,935,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326150001010 WEBER MARVIN & WEBER MARY ANN       787,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     837900 
50434326150001020 WILLCOX CHRISTINE L        730,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     837900 
50434326150002010 MCDONOUGH M P & MCDONOUGH FLORENCE S       571,626.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     847900 
50434326150002020 WEBSTER JOSEPH A III & WEBSTER MARY C       475,923.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     847900 
50434326150003010 HOLLIS EARL A JR        417,875.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     857900 
50434326150003020 KERESEY ANNE S        475,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     857900 
50434326160000010 SALTEX DEVELOPMENT LP        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000020 HARRIS ROY B JR        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000030 LAGORCE JOHN O II & LAGORCE DEBORAH W       488,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1982    650     488250 
50434326160000040 GREENE J VAUGHN        69,247.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1982    423     343350 
50434326160000050 JAMES DANIEL H & JAMES SYLVIA S &       790,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     790400 
50434326160000060 ARTHUR WARREN & MAI TSAO        689,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1982    937     689850 
50434326160000070 OWEN STEPHEN B & OWEN CECILIA P       785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000080 BUSH LARRY M & BUSH ARLENE       798,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1982   1181     798000 
50434326160000090 KENAN ROBERTA S        643,190.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     790400 
50434326160000100 LARUE BRIAN        435,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1982    594     485100 
50434326160000110 SMITH KIMBERLY H        501,657.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1982    661     557550 
50434326170000011 WELCH ELRIEDE J WELCH ELRIEDE J TR       115,475.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     549150 
50434326170000012 MERCK GEORGE F        539,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     539700 
50434326170000013 MILLER KEITHLEY R TR        759,618.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1985   2574     971250 
50434326170000015 BOHN PHILIP N & BOHN SUSAN B       549,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     549150 
50434326170000021 LOVEJOY FAITH F        463,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     564150 
50434326170000022 BENHAM DAVID B & BENHAM MARGARET W       554,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000023 JENKINS LEILA C        199,868.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000024 VAN INGEN ALEXANDRA        453,670.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000025 HOLTON CARLOTA H HOLTON FAMILY TR       463,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     564150 
50434326170000031 FARKAS ROBIN L & FARKAS CAROL       579,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     579150 
50434326170000032 HOLMAN CHARLES S JR        127,155.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000033 CURRIE EMMA L        468,620.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000034 REMMEL LITTLE JEAN        469,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000035 GEORGE DONNA L        579,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     579150 
50434326170000041 BARNETT VICTOR TRS ET AL CALER DONTEN LEVINE C/O       594,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     594150 
50434326170000042 SKENDER IVAN & JANE C SILVA       336,769.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000043 BELLINGBRATH DENNY R TR        584,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000044 RIEGEL LAWRENCE M &        584,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000045 GEDDES GERALD & ANNETTE        594,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     594150 
50434326170000051 LAGATTA-SHELTON FRANCES        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1984   1287     619500 
50434326170000052 SEZNA DAVIS G        610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1984   1287     610050 
50434326170000053 THOMAS RUTH M K        610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     610050 
50434326170000054 DE PASS ELIZABETH E & DE PASS DAVID V G       610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     610050 
50434326170000055 MICHEL GEORGE J JR & PAULINE M        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     619500 
50434326180001010 GUBELMANN SUSAN M        350,976.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1985   1260     610050 
50434326180001030 COLLINS SHEILA S TR        326,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1987    620     326550 
50434326180001040 GIBBONS VERA        330,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1987    640     330750 
50434326180002010 HOWAR JOYCE L HOWAR JOYCE L TR       861,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1987   1401     929250 
50434326180002020 SAVINA LINDA M        203,729.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1987   1143     592200 
50434326180011010 COLLINS SHEILA S        454,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1987    774     454650 
50434326180011020 COLLINS SHEILA S        337,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1987    661     337050 
50434326180011030 COLLINS SHEILA S        306,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1987    479     306600 
50434326180011040 GIBBONS JOHN D JR        306,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1987    479     306600 
50434326190000010 CPG BRAZILIAN        560,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 1 0400 CONDO 1989    797     560700 
50434326190000020 PRICE DONALD B JR &        429,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    672     429450 
50434326190000030 LOOKABAUGH CINDY K        158,506.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 3 0400 CONDO 1989    991     572250 
50434326190000040 BANNISTER DAVID G & BANNISTER DEBRA B       561,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 4 0400 CONDO 1989   1064     611100 
50434326190000050 HICKS ERIC & HICKS JULIE       510,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    854     510300 
50434326210000010 SCALA LOUIS C        298,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 1 0400 CONDO 1950    541     298000 
50434326210000020 SCALA LOUIS C        217,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 2 0400 CONDO 1950    378     217000 
50434326210000030 MILLER BARRY A        155,523.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 3 0400 CONDO 1950    378     217000 
50434326210000040 INGA HIILIVIRTA REVOCABLE TR        456,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1950    903     456000 
50434326210000050 CRETELLA ELEANOR        318,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1950    698     368000 
50434326210000060 PALMHEART INC        578,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 6 0400 CONDO 1950    980     578000 
50434327360000010 MURRAY W STEPHEN & MURRAY MUFFIE BANCROFT       1,509,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1971   3280    1509900 
50434327360000020 EDWARDS JAMES C & EDWARDS MARGARET B       1,534,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1971   2730    1534050 
50434327360000030 PERRY MARINA R PERRY MARINA R TR TITL HLDR       311,134.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000040 PALADINO WILLIAM JR & DIANE DIANE R PALADINO       309,965.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1971   1575    1080450 
50434327360000050 SAMSON MARVIN        1,679,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1971   3507    1729350 
50434327360000060 THOMAS BYRON F & THOMAS MARY H       1,561,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1971   3447    1561350 
50434327360000070 FORTIN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC        1,080,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1971   1575    1080450 
50434327360000080 PALMIERI FRANCIS L JR        539,144.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000090 GOULD GEORGE &        1,082,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000100 LEIST ALAN R        1,111,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1971   1622    1111950 
50434327360000110 BAUMAN SUZANNE P BAUMAN SUZANNE P TR       559,319.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1971   3623    1625400 
50434327380000010 LONGENBACH BRUCE R & LONGENBACH VERONICA K       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0010 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000020 LONGENBACH BRUCE & LONGENBACH VERONICA K       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0020 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000030 WISE KATHLEEN E        299,454.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0030 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000040 TALTY BERNARD J        555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0040 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000050 ZUNG LAURA & ROBERTS NATHANIEL T       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0050 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000060 FREDERICKS DOUGLAS E        299,454.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0060 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000070 OLIVER ALBERT J JR        121,199.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0070 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000080 MARINACCIO MARILYN        555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0080 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327390001010 KOPHELM ALLEN D        380,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     380100 
50434327390001030 PICKETT JOHN O JR & PICKETT ROBIN R       518,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1963   1160     518700 
50434327390001040 LARSEN HEIKKI        131,491.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     328650 
50434327390001050 MATWICZYK PETER & MATWICZYK CAROL       347,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1963    595     347550 
50434327390002010 KOPHELM ALLEN D        383,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     383100 
50434327390002020 CALLAHAN ELEANOR K TR        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390002030 KALTHOFF ROSEMARY H        127,975.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1963    580     331650 
50434327390002040 TAMASI GUY TAMASI SABINE H       60,319.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     331650 
50434327390002050 GRINKEVICH GALINA        300,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1963    595     350550 
50434327390003010 DANIELE DONNA        386,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     386100 
50434327390003020 BREYER HENRY W III        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390003030 NESHER ROBERT A & NESHER JILL C       335,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1963    580     334650 
50434327390003040 EDELSTEIN DAVID N        334,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     334650 
50434327390003050 HESSLER DALLAS        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390004010 LAND ACQUI CORP        428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1963    830     428400 
50434327390004020 RODRIGUEZ LUGO JORGE        492,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1963   1025     492450 
50434327390004030 FELDKAMP WILLIAM P        310,655.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1963   1025     492450 
50434327430000010 ALBAN JOYCE        693,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974   1133     693000 
50434327430000020 MOONIE CLYDE W & LIANA M        1,220,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1220100 
50434327430000030 RUSSELL COLETTE L        835,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1011150 
50434327430000040 PALMER RICHARD W & PALMER SUSAN M       1,124,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1124550 
50434327430000050 LARKIN OWEN G &        846,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1021150 
50434327430000060 LOSNER SHIRLEY        1,230,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1230100 
50434327430000070 BREYER HENRY W III        846,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1021150 
50434327430000080 BULLOCK SUSANNE B &        946,010.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1134550 
50434327430000090 TALOTTA LOUIS J        1,031,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1031150 
50434327430000100 ANDERSON ANDREE G TRUST ANDERSON ANDREE G TR       1,240,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1240100 
50434327430000110 MORRIS JONATHAN H        856,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1031150 
50434327430000120 REINUS FOY Y TR        234,590.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1144550 
50434327440000010 ALBAN FAMILY TRUST ALBAN MAE JOYCE TRS       966,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0010 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1178     966000 
50434327440000020 ZACHARY COSTA & ZACHARY RUTH S       139,875.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0020 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1240     994350 
50434327440000030 LIMOLI JULE E & LIMOLI DANA L       976,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0030 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1178     976500 
50434327450002010 WARREN DONALD E & WARREN BETTY ANNE       828,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1118250 
50434327450002020 SCOTT DONALD B & SCOTT ELIZABETH M       759,042.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1978   2096     975450 
50434327450002030 ALBAN MADELEINE S TR        1,118,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1118250 
50434327450003010 PELLAR DONALD & PELLAR MARCIA       365,834.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1128250 
50434327450003020 LEHNER SYLVIA P EST        305,527.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1978   2096     985450 
50434327450003030 JOHNSTON VIVIAN S TRUSTEE JOHNSTON VIVIAN S TRUST       768,103.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1128250 
50434327460010010 BALLINGER WALTER F II BALLINGER WALTER F II TR       759,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010020 POPE WILLIAM        809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010030 BALLINGER WALTER F II TRUST WALTER F BALLINGER II TR       809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010040 DEAR RICHARD K        809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460020021 EDDY MARJORIE CIZEK REV TRUST        685,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     685650 
50434327460020022 ARNOLD JANE & ARNOLD STEPHEN H       371,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1983    782     371700 
50434327460020023 BERMAN DALE & ALLISON C ALLISON C BERMAN       141,055.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     720300 
50434327460020024 GREENE WILLIAM B CARTER COUNTRY BANK C/O       720,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     720300 
50434327460020025 YANOW JOAN C        434,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1983    782     434700 
50434327460020026 THAYER SHEILA R        448,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     685650 
50434327460020031 CLARKE DONNA H        341,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     690650 
50434327460020032 REMMERT ELIZABETH D TR        439,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1983    782     439700 
50434327460020033 JENRETTE JON S & JENRETTE MARY H       725,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     725300 
50434327460020034 JCF PARTNERSHIP NANCY J DILLEY C/O       725,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     725300 
50434327460020035 DI LORENZO DANIELA        439,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1983    782     439700 
50434327460020036 CHAPDELAINE JEAN-LOUIS & CHAPDELAINE JUDY       690,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     690650 
50434327460020041 DOWLING ROBERT S & RENWICK W CROSBY       695,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     695650 
50434327460020042 SAFYURTLU ALI        252,412.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1983    782     444700 
50434327460020043 TECHGLAD INC        730,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     730300 
50434327460020044 VAUDIN YANNA        128,894.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     730300 
50434327460020045 SMITH JOHN R        444,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1983    782     444700 
50434327460020046 LEATHERMAN S R &        695,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     695650 
50434327460020051 SEGERDAHL KATHLEEN A LEIDER GERARD TR       464,351.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     700650 
50434327460020052 SCHALLMAN MIRIAM B SCHALLMAN MIRIAM B TR       360,470.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1983    782     449700 
50434327460020053 BREYER HENRY W III        735,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     735300 
50434327460020054 FRANK JUDITH A & R A FRANK SR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC       735,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     735300 
50434327460020055 GIBBONS JOHN D        449,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1983    782     449700 
50434327460020056 RANDOLPH FRANK W RANDOLPH FRANK W TR       181,547.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     700650 
50434327460020061 BECK LAURA        612,290.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     705650 
50434327460020062 HARRIS AUDREY P HARRIS AUDREY P TR       366,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1983    782     454700 
50434327460020063 SPLAWN REBECCA L        740,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     740300 
50434327460020064 CHRISTMAN ROGER        740,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     740300 
50434327460020065 MORRIS JONATHAN H        454,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0065 0400 CONDO 1983    782     454700 
50434327460020066 PEARL FRANK H & PEARL GERYL T       705,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0066 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     705650 
50434327520000010 ANDERSON JOHN W II        1,486,164.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 02 03 00 2     300336       4699       5052       4282                 
50434327520000020 DENTON VICKIE        422,892.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 03 04 01 1.5     286417       4480       4757       4086                 
50434327520000030 BELISLE MICHAEL & GARY LINDA A       1,160,461.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1995 03 04 01 2     315474       4480       4757       4086                 
50434327520000040 MATTHEWS BETSY K MATTHEWS BETSY K TR       572,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 02 03 01 2     303147       4743       5096       4326                 
50434327530001010 MCCURRACH DOUGLAS S & MCCURRACH DANIELA M       753,855.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1982   2284    1258950 
50434327530001020 DICKSON SUSAN K        1,304,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1982   2323    1304100 
50434327530001030 GALANTUCCI ROBERT L & GALANTUCCI PATRICIA       1,088,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1982   1955    1088850 
50434327530002010 CARLSON JEAN        1,258,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1982   2284    1258950 
50434327530002020 NESHER ROBERT A & NESHER JILL C       1,254,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1982   2323    1304100 
50434327530002030 HERNANDEZ OSCAR R        708,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1982   1955    1088850 
50434327530003101 GOUGH NANCY D        1,068,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 3101 0400 CONDO 1982   3433    1730400 
50434327540000011 DAVIS TERRIE A        856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000012 BLAKE CURTIS L & BLAKE PATRICIA H       856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000013 VAN PELT JANE E VAN PELT JANE E TR       806,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000014 REISS THEODORE J        856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000021 JUDELL EILEEN W        909,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     909300 
50434327540000022 COWEN ARTHUR III &        909,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     909300 
50434327540000023 DE ARAUJO SERGIO I & SERGIO I DE ARAUJO ET AL TR HLDRS       385,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     935550 
50434327540000024 WEBB SAMUEL B JR & WEBB MARSHALL B       497,703.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     935550 
50434327540000031 STETSON JULIA T TRUST JULIA T STETSON TR       914,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     914300 
50434327540000032 UNIT 3B COCOANUT ROW LLC        914,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     914300 
50434327540000033 DOUTHIT PHILIP S &        940,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     940550 
50434327540000034 HUMPHREY MARGUERITE B        940,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     940550 
50434327540000041 GOLDSTEIN FREDERICK &        931,541.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1982   3080    1555050 
50434327540000042 MILLER EMMA G MILLER EMMA G TR       380,280.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     919300 
50434327540000043 AVERY JOHN E & AVERY CARON G       356,311.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     945550 
50434327540000051 WARNER PHILIP &        924,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     924300 
50434327540000052 MILLAS TIMI &        924,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     924300 
50434327540000053 MURPHY NORMAN E ET AL        950,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     950550 
50434327540000054 RAND GERHARD A & GERHARD RAND TR TITL HLDR       531,303.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     950550 
50434327540000061 SIRIS LINDA        465,069.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1982   1770    1153950 
50434327540000062 DUFFAR FRANCOIS & L DUFFAR & M DUFFAR & SANDRINE DUFFAR       1,153,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1982   1770    1153950 
50434327550000010 DOTOLI NANCY FRANK DOTOLI C/O       117,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1984    300     117600 
50434327550000020 DOWDLE ELIZABETH D        140,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1984    361     140700 
50434327550000030 DOWDLE ELIZABETH B        455,152.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1984   1602     585900 
50434327550000060 DOTOLI NANCY        226,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1984    601     226800 
50434327550000070 FERRARA GERALDINE        39,604.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1984    322     126000 
50434327550000080 HUBBARD LYRA L        184,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1984    481     184800 
50434327560000061 WYNER SHIRLEY M TR        309,601.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0061 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000062 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A & TAFFY A        216,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0062 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000063 PRESLES ANNICK D TR & HOCQUARD SOPHIE E TR       221,101.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0063 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000064 COLLIER BARRON G II TR        153,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0064 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001811 FRYE PROPERTIES LLC        311,101.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1811 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001812 BABYATSKY MARVIN J        196,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1812 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001821 BEACHAM HORACE E JR        337,051.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1821 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001822 MODESITT CHARLES C TR & MODESITT THELMA A TR       230,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1822 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327580000021 HUTTON WILLIAM E III & HUTTON LYNN S       300,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000022 LEHR LOUIS A JR LEHR SHERRY M       315,724.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000031 SPOTS INC        731,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000032 ANDREWS EDWIN C & PATRICIA S        731,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327620000010 DOGRAMACIYAN GARBIS        1,303,951.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000020 USHER LLC        1,167,551.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000030 MARIKO INC        1,340,301.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000040 CAJIGAS CARLOS        197,401.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0040 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000050 CAJIGAS CARLOS & CAJIGAS MICHELA PELLONI DE       416,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0050 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000060 CAJIGAS CARLOS M        542,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0060 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000070 USHER LLC        399,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0070 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327630000000 COHN JONATHAN R TRUST &        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967      0        125 
50434327630001010 MARSTON ANTHONY C        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630001020 BURWEN NORMAN        263,952.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630001030 JACK JOAN L        176,262.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630001040 JORDAN DARLENE L        300,151.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630002010 SCOTT HAROLD B SCOTT JANE R       0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630002020 MOSELEY JEAN W JEAN W MOSELEY TR HLDR       227,249.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630002030 KING ROSALIE M        139,745.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630002040 THOMAS CLAIR A & VIRGINIA W VIRGINIA W THOMAS       399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630002050 SMITH W DEAN & SMITH BARBARA K       355,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     355950 
50434327630002060 OKEEFFE CLARE OKEEFFE CLARE TR       306,675.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     363300 
50434327630002070 MASON CARLL DOROTHY EST        449,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     449400 
50434327630002080 MARTIN GRACE B        124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     476700 
50434327630003010 WILLARD LOUISE B        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630003020 KERWIN JAMES & KERWIN SHEILA       612,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630003030 REILLY ROBERT F & REILLY MARY ANNE T       467,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630003040 REED STANLEY F JR        399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630003050 MILLS EVERETTE E III        360,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     360950 
50434327630003060 HERBERT MADELINE        368,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     368300 
50434327630003070 ASHFORTH H ADAMS        459,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     459400 
50434327630003080 KILLEN JOHN T III        124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     486700 
50434327630004010 YOUNGMAN BARBARA P        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630004020 GORDON CHRISTINE E        612,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630004030 CALLAHAN EDWARD W CALLAHAN EDWARD W TR       355,609.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630004040 MACHON ELIZABETH L        300,151.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630004050 KIERNAN JAMES J JR        365,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     365950 
50434327630004060 WEBB BAXTER E & ANN C ANN C WEBB       113,398.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     373300 
50434327630004070 CARTER LOUISE C        469,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     469400 
50434327630004080 LANDAU ERMINA A        496,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     496700 
50434327630005010 ODONNELL ROBERT J & ODONNELL SUE D       323,432.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     632300 
50434327630005020 NAVIN JOAN & NAVIN JOHN       642,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     692150 
50434327630005030 STETSON JOSEPHINE D        467,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630005040 OKEEFFE ARTHUR F TRUST OKEEFFE ARTHUR F TRUSTEE       399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630005050 ATKINSON JOSEPH & KATHLEEN        370,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     370950 
50434327630005060 TONER MARJORIE        113,398.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     378300 
50434327630005070 GILLESPIE EDWARD A & GILLESPIE MARIE T       479,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     479400 
50434327630005080 LYNESS C VINCENT LYNESS MARY L       124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     506700 
50434327630006010 SEZNA DAVIS G & SEZNA BARBARA       930,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2002     980700 
50434327630006020 ATKINSON JOSEPH A & KATHLEEN C ATKINSON KATHLEEN C       396,042.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2443    1121400 
50434327630006030 FRANTZ MARK G & BENTE S FRANTZ       884,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1808     884100 
50434327630006040 BRINKMANN HILKE        864,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1817     864150 
50434327630006050 GWINN RACHEL C        321,672.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2002     928200 
50434327640000000 FOUR 55 WORTH AVE CORP        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971      0        125 
50434327640001010 FOUR 55 WORTH AVE CORP        262,500.00  COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)    1971    672     262500 
50434327640002010 HODGINS WILLIAM TRUST        385,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     385350 
50434327640002020 KIBORT CHARLES A JR & KIBORT ALICE       278,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     278250 
50434327640002030 DOERR SCOTT R & GABLE CYNTHIA A       278,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     278250 
50434327640002040 SESSA GREGG V TRUST & SESSA GREGG V TR       367,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     367500 
50434327640002050 WHITE JOCELYN        266,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     266700 
50434327640002060 HARDER ROSEMARY K        266,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     266700 
50434327640002070 VIETOR NANCY        421,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     471450 
50434327640002080 FRITZ RICHARD D & ROSEMARY S        471,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     471450 
50434327640002090 ORLANDO RENE        296,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     296100 
50434327640002100 BAIN COLLEEN M        296,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     296100 
50434327640003010 MORIARTY GERTRUDE D        400,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     400350 
50434327640003020 PATCH NATHAN G        288,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     288250 
50434327640003030 SAMMONS RICHARD F & ELLETT ANNE F       288,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     288250 
50434327640003040 EKNOIAN RICHARD T        377,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     377500 
50434327640003050 FAY CLAUDIA R & FAY RICHARD       276,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     276700 
50434327640003060 WILKINSON VIRGINIA E        276,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     276700 
50434327640003070 HELLRIGL MARIA P        251,912.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     491450 
50434327640003080 NUISSL ANNA M G HAMILTON C/O       491,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     491450 
50434327640003090 PHILLIPS BRICE R TR        473,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1532     473550 
50434327640004010 SAGE HENRY W JR        84,536.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     415350 
50434327640004020 KREUSLER JANE C        298,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     298250 
50434327640004030 WALSH MICHAEL P & KREUSLER WALSH JANE       298,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     298250 
50434327640004040 PHILLIPS BRICE R & SHIRLEY E        387,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     387500 
50434327640004050 MENGONI FRED        286,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     286700 
50434327640004060 ANDREWS EDWARD B & ANDREWS MARSHA B       286,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     286700 
50434327640004070 WATTS BRUCE R & WATTS SUSAN B       511,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     511450 
50434327640004080 HEVENER MARY B        511,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     511450 
50434327640004090 VEASY JOHN P        104,566.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     326100 
50434327640004100 WALLACH FREDERICK E & HEVENER MARY H       326,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     326100 
50434327650000000 LAKE DRIVE CO OP APTS INC        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1974      0        125 
50434327650002010 STIBOLT CARL B        223,980.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     279300 
50434327650002020 PHIPPS HUBERT G        304,320.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     361200 
50434327650002030 BUCKNER CAROLE C ET AL        232,919.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     361200 
50434327650002040 STIBOLT CARL B        358,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     358050 
50434327650002050 BOWERS JAMES R & BOWERS PATRICIA BRYANT       358,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     358050 
50434327650002060 MAJOR HOWARD B JR        102,880.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     627900 
50434327650002070 KOLLOCK MARJORIE A TRUST DONOHUE F SCOTT TR       144,741.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     712950 
50434327650002080 NYHEIM JOHN A &        279,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     279300 
50434327650003010 WALLACE JULIA        284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650003020 KIBORT CHARLES A & KIBORT ALICE       245,604.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     371200 
50434327650003030 GRAINGER ROBERT T        371,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     371200 
50434327650003040 OXNAM JAMES W        368,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     368050 
50434327650003050 RUGER CHARLES &        368,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     368050 
50434327650003060 EMANUELSON DWIGHT H &        647,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     647900 
50434327650003070 FORREST ROBERT FORREST ROBERT TRUST       244,517.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     732950 
50434327650003080 KIBORT CHARLES A & KIBORT ALICE       284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650004010 SHEERAN JAMES J        284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650004020 MILLER COURTLANDT & MILLER GINA       249,028.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     381200 
50434327650004030 SCHONBEK CHARLOTTE        667,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     667900 
50434327650004040 WILLIS F GORDON & WILLIS KATHERINE F       251,216.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     378050 
50434327650004050 PHELAN MARY C        328,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     378050 
50434327650004060 MADDEN EDWARD E        617,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     667900 
50434327650004070 FREDRICKS JOAN        170,880.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     752950 
50434327650004080 SHEERAN JAMES EST        89,036.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 408 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     289300 
50434327660000000 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1970      0        125 
50434327660000010 BRINCKERHOFF SIDNEY B TRUSTEE        417,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     417900 
50434327660000020 BRINCKERHOFF NATALIE G        287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000030 BRINCKERHOFF NATALIE G        362,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     412650 
50434327660000040 VAKOUTIS JOHN &        274,052.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     417900 
50434327660000050 SCHULER WILLAIM C & SCHULER BARBARA J       287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000060 SCHULER WILLIAM C        68,244.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     412650 
50434327660000070 PRICE KATHRYN K        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000080 PRICE HENRY A TRUST        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000090 DIFILIPPO NANDO EST        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000100 SANDERS VERONICA H        48,224.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000110 FRIZZELL ALBERT T TRUST        287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000120 CORBIN ROBERT E & CORBIN JANET G       83,235.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000140 FRIZZELL ALBERT T TRUST        371,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000150 SOUTH LAKE NOMINEE TRUST HIRSCH STEVEN N TRUSTEE       274,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     274050 
50434327660000160 MILLER EDGAR        371,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000170 TENHAVE ROBERT & TENHAVE ELIZABETH C       366,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     366450 
50434327670000000 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961      0        125 
50434327670001030 MEJIA MARGARET H & MEJIA ALBERTO       805,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1960     825300 
50434327670001040 GARCIA ELIZABETH A        648,450.00  COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 104 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     618450 
50434327670001050 REED PHYLLIS A REED PHYLLIS A TR       181,018.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     767550 
50434327670001060 LEE ROBERT E & LEE ELAINE       340,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1160     375900 
50434327670001070 CARABASI RALPH & HELEN T CARABASI HELEN T       179,720.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     534450 
50434327670001080 POHANKA JOHN J POHANKA LYNN T       525,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     525000 
50434327670002010 TESE JOYCE        999,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271     999600 
50434327670002020 SCHMIDLAPP PATRICIA K        1,140,227.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2463    1158150 
50434327670002040 WILLIAMSON DOUGLAS F JR & WILLIAMSON BARBARA T       336,503.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     653100 
50434327670002050 SCHOFIELD ROBERT H & BARBARA P        702,655.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     782550 
50434327670002060 MONTOURI WARREN KENDALL MONTOURI WARREN K TR       762,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     782550 
50434327670002070 COOK KEVIT R & COOK GAIL F       494,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     544450 
50434327670002080 KIRSTEN JOACHIM R &        485,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     535000 
50434327670003010 PORTER GRANT & PORTER CHRISTINA       1,014,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271    1014600 
50434327670003020 TOTH MICHAEL C        434,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961    988     374850 
50434327670003030 HARPER ROBERT H TRUST HARPER ROBERT H TR       666,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1475     606900 
50434327670003040 NYHEIM JOHN A        683,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     673100 
50434327670003050 GOOTRAD HAROLD & GOOTRAD ROBERTA       857,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     797550 
50434327670003060 JENKINS BENJAMIN P III & JENKINS MARIANNE W       827,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     797550 
50434327670003070 LEAHEY MARY J        369,249.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     554450 
50434327670003080 JANKOWSKY JOEL &        545,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     545000 
50434327670004010 PILKINGTON ROBERT & PILKINGTON HELEN       914,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271     914550 
50434327670004020 VINTON LOUISE        444,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961    988     384850 
50434327670004030 HICKLIN HALLIE H MORGENS L C/O       686,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1475     626900 
50434327670004040 JENNINGS JOHN L & ROBERTA B JENNINGS ROBERTA B       181,018.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     693100 
50434327670004050 PRESTON GLADYS P        872,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     812550 
50434327670004060 HARRIS CAMERON M & DOROTHY W        1,390,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   3240    1360800 
50434327670004080 MATTHEWS BETSY K &        555,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     555000 
50434327670005010 PILKINGTON ROBERT TR        1,044,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271    1044600 
50434327670005020 CURRIE L RODGER & PATRICIA CURRIE PATRICIA       104,444.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1349     562800 
50434327670005030 DARLINGTON HENRY JR        507,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1114     447300 
50434327670005040 STEERE BRUCE M        301,582.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     713100 
50434327670005050 VANBUREN ROBERT VANBUREN ROBERT TR       209,896.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     827550 
50434327670005060 BRADSHAW PATRICIA PATRICIA BRADSHAW ET AL TR HLDRS       807,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     827550 
50434327670005070 PALAMAD DEV CORP        574,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     574450 
50434327670005080 MOORE MARTHA B        126,008.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     565000 
50434327670006010 CLEARY BARBARA M & BARBARA & JAMES CLEARY ET AL TR HLDRS       979,642.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2897    1424850 
50434327670006020 EPPIG RUTH S        1,150,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1908    1090950 
50434327670006030 SETTLE W SYDNOR        972,628.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2916    1296750 
50434327670006040 FLANAGAN JOSEPH P & FLANAGAN CAROL O       451,042.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1272     675150 
50434327680000000 VILLAS INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1971      0        125 
50434327680002010 BAXTER GEORGE W SR & BAXTER GEORGE W SR TR TITL HLDR       1,508,287.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2258550 
50434327680002020 GADD SARA R        1,357,871.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1873200 
50434327680002030 KEANE MARILYN T TR        1,781,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1781850 
50434327680002040 BAGLEY ANYA S BAGLEY ANYA S TR       1,470,810.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1781850 
50434327680002050 CAY JOHN E III CAY JOHN E III TR       1,358,371.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1873200 
50434327680002060 SCHULER JOHN H & SCHULER ELIZABETH L       1,708,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2258550 
50434327680003010 DEMATTEIS NANCY        2,258,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2308550 
50434327680003020 ARMSTRONG ANDREW J ANDREW J ARMSTRONG TR TITL HLDR       1,581,520.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1923200 
50434327680003030 GREENE WILLIAM B JR        1,831,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1831850 
50434327680003040 BAIN COLLEEN        636,314.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP A03D 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1831850 
50434327680003050 MCLAUGHLIN MARCELLA K TR        1,923,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1923200 
50434327680003060 FERRIN BARBARA        817,185.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2308550 
50434327680004010 GRANT ADELE R        2,358,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2358550 
50434327680004020 THE VILLAS (BAHAMAS) LTD HARRY P OAKES C/O       1,973,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1973200 
50434327680004030 KELLOGG CYNTHIA &        1,881,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1881850 
50434327680004040 MIANO JOYCE L        1,881,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1881850 
50434327680004050 BERNARD EUGENE L TRUSTEE        724,111.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1973200 
50434327680004060 LEWINTON CHRISTOPHER & LEWINTON LOUISE       2,358,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2358550 
50434327680005010 PHILLIPS SARAH B        2,408,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2408550 
50434327680005020 COOK PATRICIA L        1,684,520.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    2023200 
50434327680005030 KESSELER H J & SALLY KESSELER SALLY       690,294.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1931850 
50434327680005040 RCM JSM TRUST & MCNAIR ROBERT C TR       1,931,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1931850 
50434327680005050 HAMILTON ANITA J HAMILTON ANITA J TR       1,516,733.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    2023200 
50434327680005060 OLSON FRANK A & OLSON SARAH J       2,408,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2408550 
50434327680006010 PICKETT JOHN O & PICKETT ROBIN R       3,808,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6010 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327680006020 OHERRON KENNEDY C &        3,858,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6020 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327680006030 ALBERT ULF L        1,121,418.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6030 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327690000010 LOVE III        745,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000020 KASSATLY EDWARD & ROBERT KASSATLY TRS       1,000,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000030 MANCHESTER REALTY GROUP        735,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000040 MANHATTAN CORP LOVE REALTY C/O       690,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327700010000 PANOBIANCO GIUSEPPE        1,565,083.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1950 00 03 01 2     244774       4198       4296       4156                 
50434327700010000 PANOBIANCO GIUSEPPE        1,565,083.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1950 00 03 01 2     244774       4198       4296       4156                 
50434327710010010 VIA MIZNER SOUTH REALTY TRUST IACOI JOHN M TR       4,140,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   7853    4140000 
50434327710010020 VIA MIZNER ASSOCIATES LTD PARTNERSHIP        342,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991    890     342000 
50434327710010030 KEAN IAN M        302,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991    788     302000 
50434327710011010 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,357,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1991      0          1 
50434327710011020 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        880,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011030 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        788,401.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011040 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        817,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011050 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        235,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011060 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        230,301.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011070 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        235,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011080 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        585,901.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011090 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        277,901.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011100 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        231,701.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011110 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        345,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011120 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        189,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011140 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        301,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011150 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        555,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011160 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        443,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011170 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        562,101.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011180 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,065,601.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011190 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        852,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011200 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        848,401.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012080 ANGLO AMERICAN HOLDINGS INC        1,061,911.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012160 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,204,981.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012170 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        332,311.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012180 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        286,771.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012190 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        572,221.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710020010 ARGON L C        832,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   2337     832000 
50434327710020020 MAASS ROBB R & MAASS ELIZABETH T       591,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   1605     591000 
50434327710021010 ARGON L C        205,921.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021020 ARGON L C        186,721.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021030 ARGON L C        229,441.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021040 BLACK GRETCHEN B BARZINA C/O       137,761.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021050 BLACK GRETCHEN B BARZINA C/O       148,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021060 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        384,481.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021070 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        240,961.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021080 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        288,481.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021090 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        503,491.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021100 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        684,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021110 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        341,281.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021120 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        160,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021140 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        136,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021150 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        420,961.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710022010 ARGON L C        366,861.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327720000010 WRIGHT ROBERT W & ROBERT WRIGHT TR TITL HLDR       935,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924   1709     985000 
50434327720000020 GALIN ROBERT & GALIN PENELOPE       330,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    845     380000 
50434327720000030 BENAFIELD DENA TRUST BENAFIELD DENA TR       392,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    861     392000 
50434327720000040 HARVELL JAMES C JR &        335,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    470     335000 
50434327730000010 CAMOGE INC        740,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 1 0400 CONDO 1994   1349     740250 
50434327730000020 HOLDER DOUGLAS A SR &        697,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 2 0400 CONDO 1994   1261     697200 
50434327730000030 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       1,035,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 3 0400 CONDO 1994   1582    1035300 
50434327730010010 HOLDER DOUGLAS A SR &        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010020 CLARK JAMES MCCONNELL        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010030 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010040 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010050 WRIGHT ROBERT W & WRIGHT SUSAN C       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010060 GALIN ROBERT        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327740000010 KIMSEY STEPHEN P & KIMSEY MIRIAM O       1,231,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432774 VILLA FIORENTINA CONDO  0400 CONDO 1996   1678    1231650 
50434327740000020 PUNNETT R JOHN        1,051,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432774 VILLA FIORENTINA CONDO  0400 CONDO 1996   1678    1231650 
50434327750000030 BRYANT PATRICIA K BRYANT PATRICIA K TR       31,810.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 0003 0400 CONDO 1968    654     376950 
50434327750000040 OTTINGER KAY & ROY J ROBERTSON C/O       84,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 0004 0400 CONDO 1968    599      84000 
50434327750000050 WHITE THOMAS P JR WHITE TECLA       298,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 5 0400 CONDO 1968    507     298200 
50434327750000060 MESSINA TONY        31,810.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 6 0400 CONDO 1968    738     426300 
50434327750000070 BOLDIN WIENERT K        414,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 7 0400 CONDO 1968    719     414750 
50434327750001010 GRAHAM MICHAEL        696,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 101 0400 CONDO 1968    840     696150 
50434327750001030 GRAHAM MICHAEL        348,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 103 0400 CONDO 1968    840     348600 
50434327750002010 ODONNELL ROBERT J ODONNELL SUE D       706,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 201 0400 CONDO 1968    840     706150 
50434327750002030 GOOCH JOHN H        191,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 203 0400 CONDO 1968    420     191100 
50434327750002040 GOOCH JOHN H        191,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 204 0400 CONDO 1968    420     191100 
50434327750003010 HILLIARD MARY MYERS        1,145,077.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO PH 0400 CONDO 1968   1973    1222200 
50434327770000021 BLICK ANNETTE        641,130.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     738000 
50434327770000022 HOFFMAN HOWARD &        723,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     723000 
50434327770000023 HOWLAND NANCY LYLE        723,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     723000 
50434327770000024 SIAM INC        738,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     738000 
50434327770000031 MCCOUN GORDON W & NAPOLEON BLANCHE       748,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     748000 
50434327770000032 MILLNER DIANE E        343,258.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     733000 
50434327770000033 HOUSER W TODD &        733,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     733000 
50434327770000034 GAST ZDENKA        748,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     748000 
50434327770000041 SASSER JAMES R TR & SASSER MARY B TR       758,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     758000 
50434327770000042 HOWLAND NANCY LYLE        743,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     743000 
50434327770000043 BOURNE INVESTMENTS INC        743,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     743000 
50434327770000044 HARTZ JOHN C JR        454,564.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     758000 
50434327770000051 OAKLEY J ANNETTE        768,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     768000 
50434327770000052 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TRUST WINIFRED C HEAVEY TR       753,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     753000 
50434327770000053 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TRUST WINIFRED C HEAVEY TR       753,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     753000 
50434327770000054 PRATT ROBERT K & PRATT MONICA M       768,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     768000 
50434327770000061 PERKINS FRED F        810,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     810000 
50434327770000062 ASSAD RAMZI T LIVING TRUST        784,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     784000 
50434327770000063 RIZZO FRANK & PALERMO JOANNE       784,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     784000 
50434327770000064 CROWE ROBERT B        810,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     810000 
50434327770000071 GLASSER RICHARD S & GLASSER MARTHA M       1,208,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 7A 0400 CONDO 1980   1516    1208000 
50434327770000072 GEORGIUS JOHN R GEORGIUS JOHN R TR       1,172,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 7B 0400 CONDO 1980   1523    1222000 
50434327780000010 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        4,990,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) CU-1 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780000020 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,600,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) CU-2 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780000080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,150,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) HU 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001000 KIMRON DANIELA        310,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-100 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001010 FORTIN ENTERPRISES INC        635,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-101 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001020 SUITE 102 LLC MURIEL F SIEBERT C/O       478,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-102 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001030 GREENBAUM THOMAS E        634,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-103 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001040 LEVINE NOEL & LEVINE HARRIETTE       887,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-104 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001050 FJA1 LLC        380,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-105 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001060 LEVINE NOEL & LEVINE HARRIETTE       392,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-106 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001070 GALLAGHER NANCY Q        453,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-107 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        382,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-108 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001082 RUDOLPH DANIEL J TR & RUDOLPH DONNA J  TR       342,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-108B 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001090 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,133,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-109 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001100 CRAFT PHILIP C        323,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-110 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001110 CDS BRAZILIAN COURT LLC        1,328,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-112 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001130 MODEL BENNETT        312,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-113 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001140 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        654,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-114 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001150 CULLMAN LEWIS B        1,753,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-115 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001160 PATI H GERBER 1997 TRUST        1,366,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-116 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001170 APPLEGATE L THOMAS & APPLEGATE CATHLEEN H       1,818,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-117 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001180 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,163,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-118 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001190 DANZIGER GIGI GUGGENHEIM        331,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-119 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001200 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        320,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-120 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001210 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        316,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-121 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001220 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        629,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-122 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001230 GRENIER BART A        561,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-123 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001240 STROM KATHRYN CAREY        348,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-124 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001250 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        362,001.00 3 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001280 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        867,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-128 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001290 POPOWICH DAVID & POPOWICH LORRAINE       1,459,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-129 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001300 KRASNOW ROBERT & KRASNOW FAITH       596,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-130 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001310 ASTROP WILLIAM B & ASTROP JEAN T       599,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-131 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001320 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        438,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-132 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002010 BC 201 LLC        946,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002020 FJELDSTAD KATHERINE        435,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002030 CHEUNG CHIEH T & LIN HELEN       626,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002040 CERADINI KAREN LENARD THYLAN C/O       361,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002042 TANG ZHICHUN & SHIA JINRU       420,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002050 CHEUNG CHIEH T & LIN HELEN       389,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002060 DONEGAN MICHAEL C & SHEYBANI MANDANA       316,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002070 DINOSAUR PARTNERS BC LLC        457,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,218,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-208 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002090 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,198,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-209 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002100 KLEINHANDLER DAVID M & KRIEGER MITCHELL       305,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-210 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002110 KUROSU KATSUYUKI & C/O HIDEKO HORIGUCHI       619,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-211 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002120 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        608,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-212 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002130 SINHA ROBIN KUMAR        309,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-213 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002140 FAIRFAX & SAMMONS INVESTMENTS LLC        306,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-214 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002150 SCHWARTZ MERCEDES E        333,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-215 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002160 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,754,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-216 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002170 DEVIVO MICHAEL & DEVIVO GINGER       575,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-217 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002180 BARDWIL JAMES A        572,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-218 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002190 ZOUMAS ASPASIA        639,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-219 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002200 TRENK ALVIN S        651,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-220 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002210 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        680,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-221 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002212 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        418,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 321B 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002213 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        361,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 221C 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002220 ROTTIER ERIC & ROTTIER NORA       334,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-222 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002230 DEMELIO KAREN L        361,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-223 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002240 GOODMAN MARJORIE A        310,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-224 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002250 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        594,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-225 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002260 RICCIARDI MICHAEL & RICCIARDI GINA       566,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-226 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002270 GORDON LARRY & GORDON JANET       334,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-227 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002280 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        864,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-228 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002290 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,302,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-229 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002300 MULLANEY R RYAN JR & MULLANEY SUSAN S       661,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-230 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002310 SPRINGFED LLC        659,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-231 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002320 GUGGENHEIM DAVID S & GUGGENHEIM SHERRI       558,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-232 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002330 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        353,601.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 233 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002340 DAY NATHANIEL B & DAY LUCY R       1,686,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-234 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002350 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        983,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-235 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002360 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        839,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-236 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002370 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        838,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-237 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003010 GM PROPERTIES LLC        1,024,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003020 WHEELOCK MORGAN D & WHEELOCK JUDITH       598,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003030 BAYHOMES HOLDINGS LLC        563,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003040 BENK PAUL & BENK LAURIE L       563,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003050 WIENER LYNN        328,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003060 MARCUS KRYSTAL TR & MARCUS JUDY TR       292,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-306 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003070 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        296,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-307 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        296,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-308 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003090 GAYNOR VERE        301,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-309 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327800003260 STUART-FINDLAY CLIVE        1,200,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432780 CHILEAN CONDOMINIUM OF PALM BEACH***  0400 CONDO 1924   2184    1200000 
50434327800003280 DRENNEN DANIEL E        1,150,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432780 CHILEAN CONDOMINIUM OF PALM BEACH***  0400 CONDO 1924   2184    1200000 

Hammon-Southern
PCN OWNERNAME1 OWNERNAME2 STREETNAME BLK SITEADDR PADDR1 PADDR2 PADDR3 TOTTAXVAL ACRES PROPUSE CAMA-RESBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-RESBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF BEDROOMS NUMBER OF FULL BATHROOMS NUMBER OF HALF BATHROOMS STORY HEIGHT CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING AREA TOTAL AREA SQUARE FOOT LIVING AREA CAMA-COMBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-COMBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF UNITS STORIES CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE DESC CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING AREA 
50434326000010130 CH VILLAS LLC &        3,284,471.00 1.39 MOTEL           1922 1985 0007 01 1 WOOD FRAME     630910      13195 
50434326000020020 MYERS STEPHEN E MYERS STEPHEN E TR       17,396,464.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 09 10 01 2    6268846      18253      22474      15362         
50434326000020030 KREHBIEL F A II & KATHLEEN K        9,894,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 08 01 2    4699075      12594      15127      11298         
50434326000020040 COHEN JACQUES & COHEN FRANCOISE       1,662,777.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 00 01 00 1      63049        748        894        408         
50434326000020040 COHEN JACQUES & COHEN FRANCOISE       1,662,777.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1995 03 04 00 3     659455       5178       5614       4899         
50434326000020050 EL VEDADO LLC        17,814,973.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 07 05 2    5607740      14044      16405      12913         
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 01 02 00 1       5248        816        816        816         
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1955 05 06 01 2      65239       7893       8670       6000         
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1974 01 01 00 1       6016       1674       2388       1368         
50434326000020070 SHALEK BERDONNA WEINGARTEN BERDONNA WEINGARTEN SHALEK TR TITL HLDR       2,318,810.00 0.69 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 04 06 01 2    1716838       5802       6602       5100         
50434326000020080 SCHUSTER GERALD        11,328,193.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2000 05 08 00 2    2562986      11752      12614      10033         
50434326000020090 FANJUL JOSE F & EMILIA M FANJUL EMILIA M       3,136,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 07 01 3    2107389      10619      12398       8456         
50434326000020090 FANJUL JOSE F & EMILIA M FANJUL EMILIA M       3,136,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1957 01 01 00 1      29700        384        384        384         
50434326000020110 TRUMP IVANA        8,065,839.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 07 01 2    2099615      14192      18316      12352         
50434326000020120 SILVER LADY MANAGEMENT LLC        10,355,559.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 2005 05 07 01 3    3925552      12881      14548      11365         
50434326000020130 ABONY LORNE KOEPPEL LAW GROUP PL C/O       5,451,697.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 2000 04 06 01 2     821878       6840       7407       6426         
50434326000020150 VLAHOS DEAN & VLAHOS MICHELLE       8,642,637.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 2000 05 08 01 3    2298173      10492      11729       9714         
50434326000020160 BANYAN VENTURE        5,297,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1970 04 06 01 3     683107       6246       6913       5595         
50434326000020170 DOGWOOD LAND CO LLC        8,512,878.00 0 VACANT                   
50434326000020180 BERMAN MARTIN L        4,620,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 05 07 01 2     233811      11162      13303       9653         
50434326000020190 CHARLES S ROBERT FUND OAR LLC CHARLES S ROBERT FUND PP LP       15,671,263.00 1.95 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 03 03 01 3      15397       3355       4061       2453         
50434326000020190 CHARLES S ROBERT FUND OAR LLC CHARLES S ROBERT FUND PP LP       15,671,263.00 1.95 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 05 09 01 3     129063      15459      17292      14676         
50434326000020200 BARDES MERRILYN BARDES MERRILYN TR       6,368,930.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 08 01 3    2178502      11134      13077       7157         
50434326000020210 TRUE 680 MR. MARK FREITAS C/O       8,203,687.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 07 08 02 2    3550817      12406      13093      11497         
50434326000020220 CLOUD MARJORIE E        872,099.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1960 05 03 01 2     357921       4271       4548       4008         
50434326000020230 SCHWARTZ GERALD W        7,533,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1998 05 06 01 1    1036939       8630      10405       7654         
50434326000020230 SCHWARTZ GERALD W        7,533,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1998 02 03 00 1     140443       1640       1640       1640         
50434326000020240 MOODY WILLIAM F & LANDRY DANA E       5,828,935.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1986 05 05 00 2    1209264       6959       7091       6651         
50434326000020250 VAN SCHAICK D L        5,348,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 01 01 00 1      78058       1012       1246        528         
50434326000020250 VAN SCHAICK D L        5,348,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 04 04 01 2    1127633       5620       5870       5558         
50434326000020260 ALLEN JOSEPH        5,392,089.00 0.58 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 01 2    2348149       7354       8524       6467         
50434326000020270 DIXON F EUGENE JR        16,924,391.00 1.5708 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 07 01 2    8172775      13102      15038      11862         
50434326000020280 SPROCK H MARTIN III        6,264,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1995 05 06 01 2     518806       5326       5471       4988         
50434326000020280 SPROCK H MARTIN III        6,264,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 01 01 00 1      76538        737        737        737         
50434326000020290 SAMSON PB LLC        6,037,500.00 0 VACANT                   
50434326000020300 SLIFKA ALFRED        6,764,068.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 03 2    3030674       7412       8787       6197         
50434326000020310 KAHN GILBERT S &        7,852,050.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 04 02 2    2525299       8790      10447       7956         
50434326000020320 BOCKMANN MARIA K        6,980,501.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 08 00 2    1942129       7721       8164       7194         
50434326000020330 NORRIS PATRICIA G NORRIS SANDRA L       929,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1950 01 02 00 1      69508        816        976        460         
50434326000020330 NORRIS PATRICIA G NORRIS SANDRA L       929,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 03 03 01 2     386296       3734       3846       3660         
50434326000020340 HANLEY WILLIAM L JR HANLEY ALICE H       3,533,671.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 02 02 00 2     173521       1773       2035       1160         
50434326000020340 HANLEY WILLIAM L JR HANLEY ALICE H       3,533,671.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 04 04 01 2    1464952       6626       7685       5919         
50434326000020350 MILLER FRANK A        2,023,299.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1990 04 04 01 3    1746500       6200       6874       5521         
50434326000020360 LOW K PRESCOTT &        4,214,074.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1990 04 05 00 2    1571895       6460       7912       5580         
50434326000020370 RAMSING THOR H        1,602,882.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1950 04 03 01 1     309160       4025       4111       3823         
50434326000020380 RATHBORNE CAROL SIMMONS        3,781,121.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 2000 05 05 01 2    1896622       6874       7581       6308         
50434326000020390 MCATEE JOHN J JR &        3,108,155.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 2000 04 04 01 2    1346731       5784       6149       5242         
50434326000020400 BALLINGER WYNNE S TRUST        2,914,601.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 02 01 00 1     139995       1869       2200       1100         
50434326000020400 BALLINGER WYNNE S TRUST        2,914,601.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 05 06 00 3    1437900       6243       6603       6171         
50434326000020410 BELL LOWRY M JR & DIANA M BELL DIANA M       4,085,183.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 05 06 00 2    2115564       7655       8574       6259         
50434326000020420 KOZLOFF PAUL J KOZLOFF PAUL J TR       5,742,956.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 06 01 2    2433603       8413      10006       7055         
50434326000020430 ROUSSEAU LILLIAN ROUSSEAU LILLIAN M TR       3,099,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1947 00 02 00 2      78546       1260       1260       1260         
50434326000020430 ROUSSEAU LILLIAN ROUSSEAU LILLIAN M TR       3,099,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1983 05 07 01 2    1450585       7328       7770       6973         
50434326000020450 TOLL BRUCE E &        14,607,561.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 00 00 2    3989267      12064      15630      10982         
50434326000020450 TOLL BRUCE E &        14,607,561.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 01 00 2     242385       1673       2071        964         
50434326000020460 DIAMOND JANICE        10,386,841.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 02 00 2     188576       1394       1747        852         
50434326000020460 DIAMOND JANICE        10,386,841.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 12 05 01 2    2990223       8341      11594       6807         
50434326000020480 CURTIS ALAN & CHRISTINE W CURTIS CHRISTINE W       6,235,326.00 1.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 05 08 01 3    3728064      11333      13730      10014         
50434326000020500 LUMSDEN GARY R        1,830,507.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1980 03 03 00 2     286575       3349       3828       2600         
50434326000020510 PETRIE CARROLL        6,515,925.00 0.81 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1992 05 06 01 2    1904616       6429       6681       6146         
50434326000020520 ENGELSTEIN ALEC &        8,134,605.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 2000 00 08 00 2    2237557      10449      11815       9025         
50434326000020530 CONDREN WILLIAM J        4,832,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 05 01 2    3100039      10221      11365       9166         
50434326000020540 DUNN WILLIAM A        7,781,777.00 0.6546 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 05 08 01 2    3530475      10402      12623       8811         
50434326000020550 CANTOR IRIS CANTOR IRIS TR       9,257,637.00 0.91 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 08 00 2    2425743       9091      10808       8004         
50434326010020011 BCD INVESTORS LLP        3,893,739.00 0.84 RESTAURANT           1928 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     865520       8967 
50434326010020012 SIRENITY INVESTORS LTD        1,259,584.00 0 MULTIFAMILY           1940 1985 0011 01 2 FIRE RESIS     379290       7680 
50434326010020051 SLOANE A RICHARD SLOANE CAROLYN J       2,858,909.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    1909670       4708       5595       4256         
50434326010020052 CUMMINGS-KARP HELENE        2,776,874.00 0.1686 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    2197963       5455       6121       4967         
50434326010020061 LIGGETT ROBERT G JR TRUST ROBERT G LIGGETT TR       2,660,462.00 0.17 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    1705671       5464       6321       4822         
50434326010020070 BCD INVESTORS LLP        2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434326010030010 470 SOUTH OCEAN LLC        2,990,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434326030000011 KAHN PATRICIA A        2,320,169.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1945 04 04 01 2      17235       5478       6097       4705         
50434326030000012 RADTKE JANINA TRUST        6,354,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1995 03 03 01 1     715432       3377       4227       2823         
50434326030000030 LEVY MARK & LEVY JANET       9,755,093.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 04 06 01 2    3061340       9677      11418       8532         
50434326030000040 FELDMAN ROBERT M & FELDMAN AMY       7,426,125.00 0.52 VACANT                   
50434326030000050 MCCARTHY R HARRISON        5,630,740.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 07 01 2    2822670       8613      11104       7544         
50434326030000060 STRYKER JON 1976 TRUST STRYKER JON TR       7,426,125.00 0 VACANT                   
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 05 09 01 2    2218667      12166      14568      10878         
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 01 02 00 1      35548        348        699          1         
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 02 00 1     138972       1125       1630        664         
50434326030000091 ANDREWS CAROLYN P        2,820,166.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 3    1456106       8522       9508       7376         
50434326030000092 NESBITT GERALDINE T TR        4,404,997.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 07 01 3     946140       9457      11034       8005         
50434326030000100 PATTERSON JAMES A        11,029,102.00 1.3792 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 00 2     257838       1774       2452        841         
50434326030000100 PATTERSON JAMES A        11,029,102.00 1.3792 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 01 2    3855797      13978      16762      12217         
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1995 00 02 00 1     118564        996       1260        600         
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1995 00 03 01 2    1918291       5798       6117       5157         
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 01 01 01 2     115142        913       1106        529         
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 05 08 01 2    3377769      10893      11733       9939         
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 02 00 1     129360       1219       1320        984         
50434326030000240 STRYKER JON TR        5,678,826.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 06 01 2    2082507       7002       7779       6626         
50434326030000240 STRYKER JON TR        5,678,826.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 02 01 00 1     121104       1314       1722        710         
50434326030000270 DOMMERICH LOUIS A & JANE M DOMMERICH JANE M       862,195.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 01 01 00 1      59734        652        652        652         
50434326030000270 DOMMERICH LOUIS A & JANE M DOMMERICH JANE M       862,195.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 03 05 00 2     315437       3343       3494       3093         
50434326030000290 PRESTON JOHN & PRESTON MONIKA       8,050,971.00 0.777 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1993 05 07 01 2    4631533       9766      10872       9065         
50434326030000330 FOSTER JANE D        1,746,772.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 03 03 01 2     475160       4295       4598       3878         
50434326030000350 GLAZER AVRAM & GLAZER JILL       7,732,016.00 0.89 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 05 08 00 2    2719987      12138      14001      11074         
50434326030000360 WOOD ROBERT K        794,320.00 0.38 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 04 05 00 2     505643       4268       4426       3655         
50434326030000400 GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E TRUST GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E TR       2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434326030000411 GARRICK C STEPHENSON GULFSTREAM GUSTAFSON EDWIN JR TR       2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434326030000430 STEPHENSON CLAIRE M GULFSTREAM ROAD TRUS GUSTAFSON EDWIN JR TR       2,934,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 03 03 01 2     629229       3017       3620       2551         
50434326030000441 MAY ROBERT P MAY MARILYN R       3,300,378.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 2001 03 03 01 2    1609748       7024       8384       5925         
50434326030000460 DAVIS MARK & DAVIS NANCY       2,773,441.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1970 03 04 00 2     440319       3962       4269       2916         
50434326030000470 CHASE FLORENCE M        3,531,206.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 03 03 01 2     446669       4323       4589       3915         
50434326030000470 CHASE FLORENCE M        3,531,206.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 02 02 00 1      91005       1222       1222       1222         
50434326030000510 M R R HOLDING CORP        6,337,201.00 0.5401 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1955 00 01 00 1      21554        332        499        250         
50434326030000510 M R R HOLDING CORP        6,337,201.00 0.5401 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 04 07 01 2    1127470       6710       7113       6441         
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1956 01 02 00 2      82332       1056       1075       1012         
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 03 04 01 2     835646       3788       4130       3696         
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 01 00 1     107937        995       1770        348         
50434326030000541 LAWRENCE R C JR        3,027,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 03 01 2     714317       4158       4410       3761         
50434326030000560 ALLEN JOAN Z ALLEN JOAN Z TR       2,338,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 03 04 00 1      82543       4259       4678       3113         
50434326030000580 PIZZA JOSEPH M &        4,001,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 01 2    1712455       5206       5427       4860         
50434326030000600 WALLAU ALEX L WALLAU ALEX L TR       1,695,499.00 0.43 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1985 00 06 01 2    1173178       6696       7653       5577         
50434326030000621 NAEGELE JENNIFER J        4,853,595.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 05 06 01 3    2546090       8782      10045       8088         
50434326030000650 DRYER JOSEPH F JR &        1,466,082.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 08 00 2    1033572       7612       8660       7008         
50434326030000671 MASHEK JOHN D JR        1,275,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 03 03 01 2     946034       4455       4646       4026         
50434326030000750 ORTIZ PATINO UTA K        2,825,425.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1993 04 04 01 2    1378842       5695       6284       5609         
50434326030000761 IRVINE HORACE H II &        3,114,431.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 04 01 2    1059706       4973       5348       4570         
50434326030000771 SOTER WILLIAM J & SARAH R SOTER SARAH R       1,113,709.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 04 05 01 2    1198869       5811       7970       4660         
50434326030000791 GLAZER JOEL M & TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS C/O       7,420,861.00 0.938 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 00 05 01 1      46271        360        360        360         
50434326030000791 GLAZER JOEL M & TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS C/O       7,420,861.00 0.938 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 05 07 00 2    1293137       6234       7136       5764         
50434326030000821 DAIGH GLORIA M        2,894,521.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 03 03 01 1     346333       4043       4601       3555         
50434326030000831 MANN GEORGE S TR        2,735,766.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1992 02 03 01 2     870754       4056       4466       3378         
50434326030000860 FRANK RAMSEY & FRANK SUZANNE       3,373,063.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 01 01 00 1      41558        381        381        381         
50434326030000860 FRANK RAMSEY & FRANK SUZANNE       3,373,063.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1990 03 03 01 2    1023526       4635       5180       4136         
50434326030000870 CENTRAL AVENUE INVESTMENTS LLC JASON P THEIN C/O THOMPSON COBURN       4,937,455.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 06 00 2    2003877       5830       6654       5253         
50434326040000020 HARRISON MAI V        5,633,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 05 06 01 2    1483620       7502       8165       6845         
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1947 04 04 01 2      32516       5146       5388       5234         
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 02 02 01 2       4620       1965       2312       1156         
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 02 02 00 1       6365       1733       2032       1632         
50434327010000510 BROWN PETER D & NANCY I BROWN NANCY I       3,496,109.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 05 06 01 2    2240799       7279       8132       6492         
50434327010000521 GRUBMAN JUDITH M        3,946,688.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 04 03 01 2     766149       5004       5772       4449         
50434327010000522 DROSDICK JOHN G &        5,330,260.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1995 04 05 00 2     532262       4622       5028       4165         
50434327010000530 BALCOM LUCILLE P BALCOM LUCILLE P TR       4,570,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 05 04 01 1      20580       5218       6135       4083         
50434327010000541 BAXTER LAURA        1,782,263.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 2      18532       4681       4870       4346         
50434327010000550 CALLAHAN LEONORA A CALLAHAN LEONORA A TR       4,840,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1998 05 07 01 2    2044905       6765       7686       6203         
50434327010000570 MILLNER VIRGINIA W ASSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION C/0       6,931,223.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1990 05 06 01 2    1546504       7781       8665       6800         
50434327010000580 DODGE LORE H & LISE G MORAN       5,295,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 2      19901       5027       5547       4555         
50434327010000591 RUMBOUGH STANLEY M & JANNE H JANNE H RUMBOUGH       4,074,546.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 05 06 01 2    2043456       6858       7578       6344         
50434327010000601 CIOMEK ZDZISLAW & RADTKE JANINA       5,097,950.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327010000611 WEAN ADELAIDE M WEAN ADELAIDE M TR       9,269,970.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 04 05 00 2      21143       5310       5740       4888         
50434327010000621 MATTEI JAMES E MATTEI JAMES E TR       9,904,650.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 04 04 02     2296495       7152       7814       6630         
50434327010000631 BAXTER HAROLD AYCO CO. PERS ACCTG C/O       10,735,403.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1997 04 05 01 1    2132104       5983       6291       5494         
50434327010000641 COLEMAN DENIS P & ANNABELLE G ANNABELLE G COLEMAN       4,811,229.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 06 00 1    2136179       8303       9418       7400         
50434327010000661 ISLAND REALTY        8,198,532.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 05 04 01 2     250495       4379       4824       3874         
50434327010000670 FISHER BARBARA M & FISHER A J III       3,243,342.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327010000690 HARRINGTON RICHARD L        2,184,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 03 04 01 1      18058       4238       4610       3469         
50434327010000701 674 ISLAND DR LLC        3,011,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 04 04 01 2    1128950       5704       6138       4662         
50434327010000702 BURKHEAD J GARY & J GARY BURKHEAD ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       4,112,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1995 04 05 01 1.5     962149       7891       8783       6744         
50434327010000800 PREMIER HOLDING GROUP LLC        9,326,931.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327020000710 ROTHFELD ERIC &        12,693,724.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 08 01 2    2480450       9836      10933       8809         
50434327020000731 MCIVER BRIAN MCIVER PAMELA       4,796,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 04 05 00 2    2085624       7032       7299       6603         
50434327020000740 PATTERSON JAMES B PEYSER & ALEXANDER C/O       5,713,764.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1995 05 05 01 2    1992110       9049      10996       7966         
50434327020000751 ALJ LLC        12,085,543.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1974 03 04 01 2      21075       5129       5819       4307         
50434327020000761 TEAGLE JAYNE W FRED SHAPSS C/O       6,284,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 00 01 00 1       5083        659        810        594         
50434327020000761 TEAGLE JAYNE W FRED SHAPSS C/O       6,284,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 03 03 01 1      23748       4121       4618       3464         
50434327020000781 BARRETT DIANA        12,528,529.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1995 04 04 01 2      32010       4916       5583       4270         
50434327020000791 COLLIN CHERYL E        12,102,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 04 01 1      49256       5460       5719       5035         
50434327020000821 GUBELMANN WILLIAM GUBELMANN WILLIAM TR       7,338,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 02 2    2592732       7728       9452       6545         
50434327020000830 AMES STEVEN        13,082,285.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327020000841 BEALL KENNETH S JR        2,089,695.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 05 07 01 1     292794       6527       7542       5325         
50434327020000851 JOHNSON RICHARD S & PATSY S JOHNSON PATSY S       2,723,932.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 05 04 01 1     882994       5107       5403       4651         
50434327020000880 CARPENTER E N II & CARROLL M        8,160,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 04 01 1      17796       4594       5022       4159         
50434327020000890 HAGGIN JOHN B JR        2,806,603.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1956 04 05 01 2      25439       6170       7448       5123         
50434327020000900 KAZEMINY NASSER & KAZEMINY YVONNE P       7,084,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1995 05 05 00 2      79641       8239       8801       7175         
50434327030000251 ABC RENT A CAR LTD        5,600,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327030000252 ABC RENT A CAR LTD        9,783,201.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1990 04 04 01 1    1657438       6961       7411       6014         
50434327030000270 HENNESSY EDWARD L JR & RUTH S HENNESSY RUTH S       2,671,160.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1990 05 06 01 2    1393384       7005       7228       6526         
50434327030000280 DWARES BONNIE DWARES BONNIE TR       5,859,009.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 05 07 01 2      30160       7006       8380       6394         
50434327030000291 REMINGTON KAMILA        2,001,450.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 05 01 2      23941       5880       7474       4290         
50434327030000310 RAKOLTA TERRY L ROSEN MARVIN S TR TITL HLDR LAND TST       12,069,435.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 02 2    3945907       8360      10159       7239         
50434327030000320 HICKOX CHARLES C        4,467,632.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 05 01 1      22264       5419       5712       5103         
50434327030000340 CORRIGAN HAROLD F & CORRIGAN LORRAINE       4,818,045.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 2001 05 04 00 2    1087991       7640       8674       6874         
50434327030000350 CUDLIP MARY BRITTAIN B        5,001,820.00 0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 05 06 01 2     104287       8106       8361       7368         
50434327030000361 KEAN IAN M        3,755,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 01 01 00 1       3149        754        776        744         
50434327030000361 KEAN IAN M        3,755,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 04 01 2      17571       4534       4963       3993         
50434327030000372 RINKER RUBY S TR        8,129,787.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 04 01 2      18895       4597       5325       3817         
50434327030000400 BARBARA FRED HUMBERT LISA       4,497,711.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 08 00 2    1831810       6837       8148       6314         
50434327030000410 ASCHE F B JR & SARAH P TRUST ASCHE FREDERIC B JR TR       7,652,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1975 05 07 00 1      55105       5934       6163       5465         
50434327030000420 LICKLE RENEE K & LICKLE WILLIAM C       2,891,131.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 04 05 01 2    1181304       7133       7522       6698         
50434327030000430 575 ISLAND DRIVE TRUST ZISKA MAURA TR       7,587,125.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327030000440 FISHER-GROW CHRISTINE CHRISTINE FISHER-GROW TR TITL HLDR       4,512,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1990 05 04 00 2     787064       6897       7589       6244         
50434327030000450 STARK JOHN &        8,663,648.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1985 05 07 01 2    1093417       8469      10021       7683         
50434327030000460 POLLACK EDWARD & DEBORAH DEBORAH POLLACK       1,891,153.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1985 04 05 00 2      18991       4674       5565       4503         
50434327030000470 KNUDSEN JUDITH F        3,307,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 00 00 1    1224107       5517       6048       4924         
50434327030000481 JOHNSON MARGARET A & JOHNSON THOMAS S       6,480,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 04 05 01 2    1719534       7454       8811       6655         
50434327030000482 BERLEY PETER & BERLEY LINDA K       6,674,767.00 0.4626 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 07 00 2    2600138       7548       8744       6599         
50434327040000010 ISLAND ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        7,526,141.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 05 01 2     245041       6406       6658       6028         
50434327040000010 ISLAND ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        7,526,141.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 03 03 00 2      65660       2270       2270       2270         
50434327040000031 HUFTY FRANCES A HUFTY FRANCES A TR       2,728,352.00 0.5386 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 05 01 2     621017       6383       6562       6010         
50434327040000051 HUFTY PAGE LEE & BELL THEODORE A III       3,885,806.00 0.5055 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 05 04 01 1     392663       4470       4508       4454         
50434327040000061 SMITH JANE W &        2,248,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 05 06 01 2     206262       6333       6903       5757         
50434327040000072 VIOLET HILL DEV CO LTD        6,006,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327040000090 FALK MICHAEL & FALK ANNIE       5,605,614.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 05 01 2    3184321       9259      10718       8263         
50434327040000101 VIOLET HILL DEV CO        8,884,836.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 06 01 2    2421781       8095       9908       7166         
50434327050000012 101 EL BRAVO LLC        12,316,500.00 0 VACANT                   
50434327050000020 TROPIN KENNETH G & TROPIN KATHLEEN O       18,445,897.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 2001 07 09 04 2    6251125      11736      14318      10843         
50434327050000040 4 EL BRAVO TRUST & BROBERG PETER S TR       5,956,275.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 05 06 01 3.5    1666718      10657      11072      10496         
50434327050000040 4 EL BRAVO TRUST & BROBERG PETER S TR       5,956,275.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 01 01 00 2     127554       1568       2200        825         
50434327050000060 KOCH RONALD B & KOCH PAULETTE W       5,270,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1973 05 06 01 1    1138207       7492       8171       6445         
50434327050000191 VAN WAVEREN JEAN M VAN WAVEREN JEAN M TR       3,193,917.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 05 08 01 2     190774       9217      10495       8359         
50434327050000192 KARAKUL KENN BROBERG PETER S TR       5,264,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1984 04 05 01 2     847985       5253       5532       4668         
50434327050000192 KARAKUL KENN BROBERG PETER S TR       5,264,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 1      85913        792        792        792         
50434327050000200 OCEANIC PLACE PROPERTIES LLC KENNETH WANG C/O       15,290,994.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 09 01 2    2201413      10536      11654       9706         
50434327050000220 TAYLOR MARGARETTA D MARENTETTE C/O       7,486,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 10 01 3    2845581      11824      12606      11160         
50434327050000230 MASHEK CHANDLER C        5,346,311.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 08 01 2    4833995       9482      12090       8183         
50434327050000240 GORDON DONALD &        9,897,545.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 01 01 00 2      90584       1347       1585        793         
50434327050000240 GORDON DONALD &        9,897,545.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 00 06 02 2    5179148       8697      11072       7864         
50434327050000380 TOLL WILLIAM M        9,296,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 05 09 00 2     262967      10737      12321       9690         
50434327060000070 CUMMINGS PETER D & CUMMINGS JULIE F       4,793,788.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1980 05 08 00 2    1874719       7549       7884       6832         
50434327060000081 SUMMERS GEORGE E        2,477,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 04 05 01 2    1883274       6995       7366       6113         
50434327060000090 FAILING BRUCE & FAILING LEIGH       3,497,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 05 01 2    1048639       7611       8547       6592         
50434327060000100 VLAHOS DEAN &        4,063,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1996 01 01 00 1      29371        295        421          1         
50434327060000100 VLAHOS DEAN &        4,063,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1996 04 05 01 2    1124093       6206       7524       5788         
50434327060000110 WOODWARD ORATOR E 251 EL BRAVO TRUST       1,647,338.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 04 05 01 2    1145940       5750       6087       4727         
50434327060000120 MILLER ALAN H & MILLER HARRIET L       7,997,212.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 06 01 2    6039178      11052      13837       9510         
50434327060000131 FIVERSON NANCY        10,458,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 02 02 00 1      89822       1140       1205        989         
50434327060000131 FIVERSON NANCY        10,458,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 06 00 1     543057       6336       7181       5717         
50434327060000150 BOVE MICHAEL J III BOVE PAMELA A       1,356,044.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 02 02 00 2      83006       1224       1440        720         
50434327060000150 BOVE MICHAEL J III BOVE PAMELA A       1,356,044.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 03 05 01 2     811043       6189       6478       5798         
50434327060000160 MOORE DUDLEY L JR & MOORE MARGARET B       10,456,746.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 08 09 02 2.5    6644864      14461      18095      12799         
50434327060000180 PROSSER JEFFREY PROSSER DAWN       7,591,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1995 05 08 01 3    4111164      10842      12357       9958         
50434327060000251 QUICK PATRICIA        4,829,335.00 0.4557 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 05 01 2    2958908       6884       7800       5995         
50434327060000252 MORGAN MITCHELL & HILARIE L TRUSTEE MORGAN HILARIE L TRUSTEE       14,366,084.00 0.9939 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 05 06 01 3    2248845      13535      14756      12669         
50434327060000270 GAY DEBORAH H        6,126,443.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 06 01 2    2639692       7005       7738       6188         
50434327060000280 KARP JAMES S & KARP IRENE J       5,413,751.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 07 01 2    2882146       8408       9490       7766         
50434327060000290 WETHERELL DAVID        4,826,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1932 02 02 00 2     124673       2732       3232       1564         
50434327060000290 WETHERELL DAVID        4,826,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 06 00 2    1213808       5031       5449       4856         
50434327060000321 CUNNINGHAM JOHN F & ELLEN M CUNNINGHAM ELLEN M       3,885,901.00 0.68 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 05 01 2    1675737       8109       9925       7328         
50434327060000330 ROSINSKY CLAUDE        2,098,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 01 01 00 2     108600       1275       1500        750         
50434327060000330 ROSINSKY CLAUDE        2,098,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 05 06 01 2    1535742       5417       5513       5273         
50434327060000341 SHIELDS MAURY F & SHIELDS J V JR       4,953,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 01 01 00 2     527070       1996       2496       1713         
50434327060000341 SHIELDS MAURY F & SHIELDS J V JR       4,953,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 04 04 01 2    2378086       4428       5461       4140         
50434327060000350 MURRAY TERRENCE & TERRENCE MURRAY TR TITL HLDR       3,808,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 04 05 01 2    1410961       5870       6657       4993         
50434327060000361 MAHONEY DANIEL J III MAHONEY SUZANNE       2,379,150.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1960 04 05 01 2    1116250       6248       6575       6125         
50434327060000361 MAHONEY DANIEL J III MAHONEY SUZANNE       2,379,150.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1961 01 01 00 2     102234       1904       2240       1120         
50434327060000371 CONDRON CHRISTOPHER M & CONDRON MARGARET M       5,484,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1993 01 01 00 2      87812        953       1372        536         
50434327060000371 CONDRON CHRISTOPHER M & CONDRON MARGARET M       5,484,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1993 04 05 01 2    1929099       6046       6369       5907         
50434327060000381 COLLIER BARRON G II TR        4,596,971.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 04 05 01 2    1120310       6956       7446       5930         
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 05 07 01 2    1201050       9510      11441       8004         
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 01 01 00 1     102505       1122       1122       1122         
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 03 00 1     179025       1660       1660       1660         
50434327060000410 MORGAN MITCHELL & HILARIE L TRUSTEE        10,000.00 0 R/W - BUFFER                   
50434327070000010 NEWQUIST SCOTT C        7,712,783.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 06 00 2    2148288      11307      12891       9472         
50434327080000110 COWELL RICHARD C        2,345,915.00 0.7 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 08 01 2    2402408       8526       8988       7820         
50434327080000421 ROSS WILBUR L JR        4,698,648.00 0.3647 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1980 05 06 01 2     925331       6810       7116       5719         
50434327080000422 DOCTOR DANIEL W & DOCTOR JUDITH E       4,266,365.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1995 04 04 01 2    1281897       5278       5685       4951         
50434327080000440 ROSS WILBUR L JR        9,985,675.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 05 06 00 2    2849855      11164      12727      10343         
50434327080000450 ARASKOG RAND V ARASKOG JESSIE M       7,055,365.00 0.8647 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1999 10 07 00 1    7032341      13511      14900      12374         
50434327080000471 MEYER WILLIAM A & MEYER DENISE S       5,446,691.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 2001 05 07 00 2    1216906       6237       7552       5426         
50434327080000480 MORRISON CARLOS        9,652,232.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 05 07 01 1     140318      14620      15379      14015         
50434327080000500 WISTER DIANA S        6,298,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1975 05 07 00 2    1468149       9101       9747       8753         
50434327080000500 WISTER DIANA S        6,298,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1959 02 02 00 1     153953       1582       1582       1582         
50434327080000520 FARRIS CECILIA L        2,248,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1950 05 08 01 3    1643085      11749      12406      11278         
50434327080000531 QUICK THOMAS C        4,972,736.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 05 07 01 2    1900282       9011      10428       7981         
50434334000050010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF LESSOR NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC LESSEE       0.00 40.9 MUNICIPAL                   
50434335000010010 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       1,727,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 01 02 00 2      74092        582        625        482         
50434335000010010 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       1,727,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 01 2     491145       3050       3117       3033         
50434335000010020 TIGGES PETER &        8,767,724.00 1.4212 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 05 07 01 2    1969477       9555      10819       8630         
50434335000010020 TIGGES PETER &        8,767,724.00 1.4212 SINGLE FAMILY 1933 1965 04 05 01 1     360165       6463       6918       5767         
50434335000010030 RAPAPORT ROBERT D & COBEY W COBEY W RAPAPORT       7,739,427.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1998 00 05 01 2    6061909      15485      17137      14300         
50434335000010040 SCHLESINGER RICHARD & LESLIE        25,535,705.00 2.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 11 01 3    2575870      14883      21534      12304         
50434335000010040 SCHLESINGER RICHARD & LESLIE        25,535,705.00 2.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 00 01 00 1      96093        852       1654          1         
50434335000010060 FALCONE EDWARD        7,191,583.00 0.94 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 08 01 3    1633806       9770      11208       8863         
50434335000010060 FALCONE EDWARD        7,191,583.00 0.94 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 01 02 00 1      78987        972       1020        900         
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 2003 05 07 01 2    1594675       6551       7023       6056         
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1995 01 01 00 1      76972        500        500        500         
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 03 00 2     576320       2393       2592       2326         
50434335000010090 822 S COUNTY LLC        12,084,294.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 2000 05 06 01 2    1918063       9341       9704       8967         
50434335000010090 822 S COUNTY LLC        12,084,294.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 02 03 00 1     481896       2413       2967       2039         
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1980 01 01 01 2      44010        469        552        276         
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1980 02 01 00 1      97674        988       1175        550         
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 2000 05 07 01 2    4458928      10782      13022       9952         
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1997 00 02 00 1      67727        563        937          1         
50434335000010110 VENTO GERALD & VENTO MARGARET       16,015,438.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 10 01 3    6523515      20606      23526      17424         
50434335000010120 ROYCE CHARLES M & ROYCE DEBORAH G       6,529,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 04 05 01 2    2376011       5530       6055       4714         
50434335000010120 ROYCE CHARLES M & ROYCE DEBORAH G       6,529,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1973 01 02 00 2     119243        849       1059        750         
50434335000010130 RAQUET WALTER & RAQUET NANCY       10,017,424.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1967 00 01 00 2     123710       1548       1885        760         
50434335000010130 RAQUET WALTER & RAQUET NANCY       10,017,424.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1994 05 08 01 2    3093335      12681      16401      11830         
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1942 02 02 00 1      38104        612        760        494         
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1942 02 02 00 1      79096       1246       1472        720         
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 07 01 2    2533362       9854      11692       8295         
50434335000010160 BILOTTI MARGARET S        4,289,855.00 1.1614 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1996 05 06 01 2    2708314       9775      11214       8581         
50434335000010160 BILOTTI MARGARET S        4,289,855.00 1.1614 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1996 02 01 00 1     121699       1426       1426       1426         
50434335000010180 204 VIA DEL MAR LLC        4,025,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434335000010190 VECELLIO LEO A JR & VECELLIO KATHRYN C       8,179,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1996 00 02 00 1     104598        793       1021        391         
50434335000010190 VECELLIO LEO A JR & VECELLIO KATHRYN C       8,179,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1996 05 06 01 3    2426262       9091      11094       8110         
50434335000010200 MOENS LAWRENCE A        2,686,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 04 05 01 3     218482       6583       8210       5800         
50434335000010200 MOENS LAWRENCE A        2,686,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2000 02 03 00 1     311162       2125       2835       1540         
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1942 02 02 00 2     151771       2776       3384       2178         
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1942 01 02 00 1      79785       1328       1664        736         
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1965 05 08 01 2    1100557      10995      11443      10171         
50434335000010220 CAFARO JOHN J  FAMILY TRUST CAFARO JOHN J TRUSTEE       14,503,945.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2001 05 08 01 3    1281226      17040      24332      14258         
50434335000010250 BECKER CHARLES E TR        15,989,690.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1999 05 10 00 2    7814168      15269      22253      13171         
50434335000010260 TOMSICH ROBERT J TR        9,077,296.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1998 01 01 00 1      73252        539        828         60         
50434335000010260 TOMSICH ROBERT J TR        9,077,296.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1998 05 11 01 2    3750651      17446      21576      13826         
50434335000010270 TOMSICH ROBERT J        2,875,000.00 0.45 VACANT                   
50434335000010280 PASHCOW JOEL        6,635,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2001 04 05 01 2    3274529       8149       9758       7068         
50434335000010290 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        3,842,565.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1970 05 07 00 2    1534622       6921       7418       6528         
50434335000010300 LICHTENBAUM JOYCE M & SUSAN B LICHTENBAUM TRS       2,396,949.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 02 03 00 1       6099       1604       1642       1587         
50434335000010310 TELESCO DOMINICK & SUSAN SUSAN TELESCO       2,949,309.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 02 02 00 1     107477       1591       1872        936         
50434335000010310 TELESCO DOMINICK & SUSAN SUSAN TELESCO       2,949,309.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 11 00 2    2762840      12450      13626      11659         
50434335000010320 ROWAN RENA        2,362,040.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1947 01 01 00 1      77353       1334       1334       1334         
50434335000010320 ROWAN RENA        2,362,040.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1992 04 05 00 2    1935958       5901       6555       5186         
50434335000010330 FLYNN MICHAEL & FLYNN ANNE       4,065,159.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1990 05 10 00 2    1488665       8802      10125       7804         
50434335000010340 DAVIS JUNE R        1,011,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1937 04 05 01 2     463638       6808       7206       6674         
50434335000010340 DAVIS JUNE R        1,011,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1948 02 02 00 1      78002       1252       1832        752         
50434335000010350 260 VIA BELLARIA LLC        8,276,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1995 05 07 01 2     905720       9104      12272       6873         
50434335000010350 260 VIA BELLARIA LLC        8,276,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1990 03 01 00 1     105625       1260       1512        672         
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1942 02 02 01 2      84134       1290       1518        759         
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 05 11 00 3    5881318      16521      20051      15604         
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1999 02 02 00 1     256781       2635       2661       2597         
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 2     173884       1871       2575        928         
50434335000010390 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        690,000.00 0.1 VACANT                   
50434335000010400 GREENBAUM RYNA        6,180,922.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 01 2    3842188       7419       8919       6532         
50434335000010410 DANKIN DOROTHY F & DOROTHY F DANKIN TRUST       2,200,961.00 0.42 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1955 05 08 00 2    1291559       7234       7535       6868         
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1998 03 03 01 1     258203       2677       2957       2557         
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 08 09 04 3   12987054      30437      42196      20543         
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 01 01 00      215153       1816       3044        627         
50434335000020010 CHOPIN L FRANK CHOPIN L FRANK TR       4,015,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1985 02 01 01 1     172437       2171       3592       1677         
50434335000020020 ROLLNICK WILLIAM        3,339,319.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 04 01 2     884291       4926       5601       4353         
50434335000020020 ROLLNICK WILLIAM        3,339,319.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 02 00 2     140563       1100       1216       1050         
50434335000020030 MONELL EDMUND C JR & TERRY T TERRY T MONELL       1,349,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 03 03 01 1     366038       3591       3777       3197         
50434335000020040 POWER RICHARD & POWER MARIA       7,727,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 05 06 01 2    4905716       9503      11392       8698         
50434335000020040 POWER RICHARD & POWER MARIA       7,727,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 02 00 2      94461        994       1249        573         
50434335000020050 TIEFEL WILLIAM R &        1,917,327.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 05 06 01 2     922515       8969       9425       8512         
50434335000020060 YOUNG ANNE R        1,505,598.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 02 02 00 2     131898       1369       1803        776         
50434335000020060 YOUNG ANNE R        1,505,598.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 03 03 01 1     199993       3186       3259       2895         
50434335000020070 SCAIFE FRANCES G        2,330,070.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 04 05 01 2      20367       6166       7156       5062         
50434335000020080 SCAIFE FRANCES G        2,698,394.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 04 06 01 1     699836       5176       5745       4289         
50434335000020090 CONRAD MARY S        3,480,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 03 03 00 1     324191       4281       4407       4035         
50434335000020100 SMITH HAROLD B NORTHERN TRUST CO TR       6,147,452.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1980 05 07 01 2    3187541      10614      11660       8952         
50434335000020110 MENDEL NANCY W        2,985,943.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 04 04 01 2     674560       4989       5540       4224         
50434335000020120 SCAIFE JENNIE K VEGOSEN DEAN TR       6,555,916.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 09 00 1    1219433       6879       8425       5517         
50434335000020120 SCAIFE JENNIE K VEGOSEN DEAN TR       6,555,916.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1990 01 01 00 1     103749       1074       1978        209         
50434335000020140 BORISLOW DANIEL & BORISLOW MICHELE       8,290,578.00 0.9393 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 05 02 2      49124       7743       8988       6263         
50434335000020150 JACK KARIN        6,191,314.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1991 05 06 01 2    1277310       7487       8048       6736         
50434335000020170 FOGG NITA S        1,367,286.00 0.51 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 04 00 1     838189       4072       5001       3372         
50434335000020180 DEITCHER JONATHAN RBC DOMINION SECURITIES C/O       3,518,382.00 0.93 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 1      23883       3574       4032       2746         
50434335000020190 TOLLMAN BEATRICE        10,958,299.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1954 05 14 01 2     203952      17160      18554      15241         
50434335000020200 FEICK STUART E        938,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1975 04 04 01 2      74513       4347       4649       3859         
50434335000020201 GOLDNER NORBERT & GOLDNER LIDIA       2,772,325.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1990 03 03 01 1     724390       4264       4919       3613         
50434335000020220 PORRECA VANESSA        3,846,298.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1982 05 06 01 1    1331894       7129       7542       6426         
50434335000020230 HARUVI ABE & HARUVI GIOVANA       3,547,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 03 03 01 1     662903       5681       6453       3996         
50434335000020240 LIND GERARD G & CAROLYN R LIND CAROLYN R       814,098.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1952 03 03 01 1     319222       3847       4042       3545         
50434335000020250 BITTON SALOMON &        2,811,877.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 05 06 01 1     248651       6003       7633       4915         
50434335000020260 HUNT VICTORIA HUNT RECTOR S III       2,879,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 04 04 01 2    1170747       5410       5956       4848         
50434335000020270 GOSSETT W TED        3,371,256.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 04 01 1     531407       4438       4723       3779         
50434335000020280 YSC FLORIDA LLC        12,806,925.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1995 05 07 01 2    3733187       7065       8151       5997         
50434335000020290 RANK PROPERTIES        3,406,906.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 05 07 00 2    1095038       7220       7593       6676         
50434335000020300 CARSON CREEK CORP CITCO BVI LTD C/O       2,593,857.00 0.44 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 03 03 00 1     276893       3068       3284       2344         
50434335000020310 VAUGHN CLOTHER H & JOYCE E VAUGHN JOYCE E       597,180.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 03 03 01 1     240582       2799       2930       2493         
50434335000020320 ANDERSON ALBIN F        895,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1952 01 01 00 1      81951       1149       1352        676         
50434335000020320 ANDERSON ALBIN F        895,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 00 03 00 1     112176       2710       2811       2666         
50434335000020330 MADOFF MARION MADOFF BERNARD C/O       4,248,147.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1995 00 05 00 1    1137747       6261       7373       5473         
50434335000020340 MANDELL RONALD B        1,421,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1985 01 01 00 1      95503        931        931        931         
50434335000020340 MANDELL RONALD B        1,421,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 04 01 2     729081       4135       4452       3772         
50434335000020360 ILYINSKY ANGELICA K        4,578,973.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 07 01 2    1402299       7428       7774       6618         
50434335000020370 GOODRICH FLORIDA REALTY TRUST HINES EDWARD F JR TR       7,358,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 05 05 01 2     515846       6021       6322       5654         
50434335000020380 GUNDLACH HEINZ L GUNDLACH HEINZ L TR       652,769.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1990 03 04 00 1     407932       4440       4615       4136         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1927 1965 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1123000      37414 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      35850        414 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      43610        624 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     114200       1870 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1961 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      68750       2534 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1962 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     104140       1608 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1963 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     177550       1968 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1997 1997 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     104610        660 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     469150       2252 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1101660       5042 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2004 2004 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    3437540      17374 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2005 2005 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     567490       5061 
50434335000020391 BARRY MARYANNE        369,495.00 0.16 VACANT                   
50434335000020430 LEHMANN GUNTHER H 1ST NATIONAL PAYMENT SERVICES C/O       9,595,337.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 05 05 01 1    2216067       6293       7026       5702         
50434335000020440 SCHMEELK RICHARD J &        6,832,651.00 0.65 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2002 05 06 01 2    1637919       7164       7666       6652         
50434335010000010 KURTZ RICHARD THE KAMSON CORP C/O       6,006,000.00 0 VACANT                   
50434335010000020 OKEAN PAUL Z        1,577,654.00 0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1980 04 04 01 1     787647       4418       4562       3987         
50434335010000031 DONNELLEY THORNE B & MONNIE B DONNELLEY THORNE B       1,771,010.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1955 00 01 00 2      69167        823        968        484         
50434335010000031 DONNELLEY THORNE B & MONNIE B DONNELLEY THORNE B       1,771,010.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 07 00 2     731859       5121       5356       5076         
50434335010000060 ALGER GALE        2,169,181.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1995 04 04 00 2     794608       4316       4815       3862         
50434335010000070 GREEFF OLIVE R        887,119.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1969 01 01 00 1      50185        556        629        387         
50434335010000070 GREEFF OLIVE R        887,119.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 03 00 1     312244       3789       3924       3539         
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC        4,579,722.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 03 01 00 1      60107        823        968        484         
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC        4,579,722.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1970 03 02 00 1     127099       1735       1735       1735         
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC        4,579,722.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 05 07 00 2     925655       5180       5348       5124         
50434335010000101 10 VIA VIZCAYA LLC MALASKY HOMES INC C/O       10,884,601.00 0.667 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 06 07 01 2    3495398       9625      10720       8627         
50434335010000110 11 VIA VIZCAYA LLC MALASKY HOMES INC C/O       6,634,918.00 0.4531 VACANT                   
50434335010000120 KURTZ RICHARD KAMSON CORP C/O       5,405,400.00 0 VACANT                   
50434335010000130 MALASKY DONALD C MALASKY DONALD C REV TRUST       3,310,962.00 0.492 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    1711103       6327       6619       5913         
50434335010000140 MCHUGH GODFREY T & LILLIAN        2,598,621.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 03 03 00 1     282812       3421       3633       3067         
50434335020000150 2042312 ONTARIO INC        2,503,452.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 04 01 2    1328384       3990       4481       3532         
50434335020000161 MELE GAUDIERI ROBBIN ALAN R LEIST JR ET AL TR HLDRS       1,488,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1990 03 03 00 2     375688       3687       3843       3322         
50434335020000162 KANTER MYRON A & KANTER MYRNA H       1,746,432.00 0.26 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 01 1     586412       3457       3690       3046         
50434335020000170 LEE J PHILIP & AMY R        1,709,389.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 03 03 01 2     550037       3120       3245       2829         
50434335020000180 MOSELLE ROBERT        1,512,439.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 03 03 01 1     405733       3226       3375       2669         
50434335020000190 CALMAN ROBERT F & DORIS S CALMAN DORIS S       581,474.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 05 04 00 2     262200       3002       3093       3033         
50434335020000200 SCHILLER ELIZABETH J        749,463.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 01 2     431614       3868       4036       3616         
50434335020000210 ZOIS ELIA        4,596,768.00 0.44 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 04 05 01 2    1558738       6803       7154       6124         
50434335020000220 DWYER ROBERT J DWYER CONCEITA A       3,331,149.00 0.4599 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1995 05 05 01 2     809012       5853       6843       5253         
50434335020000231 CAIN JOSEPH        1,916,097.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 04 01 2     749865       4596       4745       4280         
50434335020000232 KHAWLY MARY T        2,684,344.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 04 04 01 1     707345       4441       6244       3498         
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR       16,501,073.00 1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1940 03 02 00 2      50231        816        860        750         
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR       16,501,073.00 1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1980 05 08 01 1     589070      12546      14362      10701         
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR       16,501,073.00 1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 1      33660        313        521          1         
50434335030000110 LEE SAN K J        5,636,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1975 02 02 00 2     124790       1268       1586        786         
50434335030000110 LEE SAN K J        5,636,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 2000 04 06 01 2    1643435       7133       7412       6940         
50434335030000120 HAMILL STERLING M        4,813,252.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 05 08 01 2    1374901       8210       9610       6500         
50434335030000140 MARULLI ALFRED & BARBARA MARULLI BARBARA       1,521,175.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 05 05 01 2    1065122       7268       7583       6221         
50434335030000150 BAKER VICTORIA O        1,198,577.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 05 05 00 1     424128       4885       5276       4237         
50434335030000160 RICKMAN WILLIAM M JR & MARCIA B TRUST        5,428,857.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 05 04 01 2    1778269       5718       5784       5784         
50434335030000160 RICKMAN WILLIAM M JR & MARCIA B TRUST        5,428,857.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     134138       1430       1628        968         
50434335030000171 STUART GLORIA G        5,549,651.00 0.9292 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1990 04 07 00 2     893581       7342      10188       6016         
50434335030000173 MILLER HOLLY A MILLER MYRON TR       2,430,599.00 0.5507 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1932 01 01 00 1      65507       1099       1335        640         
50434335030000173 MILLER HOLLY A MILLER MYRON TR       2,430,599.00 0.5507 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 03 03 01 1     667104       3476       4796       2996         
50434335030000210 MILLER MYRON TR        87,544.00 0.2089 VACANT                   
50434335040000010 WEITZMAN CAROLE        1,537,494.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 05 05 01 2     307959       5843       6470       4494         
50434335040000020 BOHANNON BENTON P        1,669,433.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 04 05 00 2     454317       4236       5182       3143         
50434335040000030 JACKSON R E JR JACKSON CAROLYN J       1,203,985.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 05 05 01 3     845065       6322       7185       4606         
50434335040000040 MCNAMARA JAMES J & MCNAMARA ANGIE       903,290.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 05 06 00 3     714705       6696       7309       6330         
50434335040000050 STONESTROM ERIC &        2,293,519.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 04 04 01 2    1046161       4888       6032       4286         
50434335040000060 BROWNLOW GIRARD P III        2,055,401.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 01 2     667295       5305       5417       4952         
50434335040000070 BERNSTEIN MICHAEL E &        1,173,125.00 0 VACANT                   
50434335040000080 GWYNNE JAY M        1,657,403.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 03 03 01 1     444241       3983       4187       3603         
50434335040000090 165 KINGS ROAD LLC        9,388,930.00 0.71 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 00 07 01 2    2147916       8151       8789       7577         
50434335040000110 KCC FLORIDA DEV CORP        6,426,187.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 05 07 00 2    1798003       7280       8460       6540         
50434335040000120 EMBRESCIA JUDITH A THOMAS J EMBRESCIA TR TITL HLDR       2,058,293.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1980 04 04 00 2     716461       4793       5523       2920         
50434335040000130 AARON GENE & AARON MINDY       3,879,856.00 0.3285 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 01 2    2458142       6244       6937       5846         
50434335040000140 KINGS ESTATE INC        1,380,000.00 0.3285 VACANT                   
50434335040000150 KENNEDY SUZANNE W KENNEDY SUZANNE W TR       601,225.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 03 03 00 1     321908       3302       3884       2984         
50434335040000150 KENNEDY SUZANNE W KENNEDY SUZANNE W TR       601,225.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 01 01 00 1      42068        531        644        483         
50434335040000160 TAYLOR MILBREY R        1,782,960.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1960 04 04 01 2     232011       4392       5252       3725         
50434335040000170 WEISSMAN JODY        4,996,926.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1990 05 07 01 3.5    4120162       9347      12380       7480         
50434335040000180 JDPB HOLDINGS INC        2,041,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1980 04 04 01 2     651439       4403       5287       3784         
50434335040000190 SCAIFE JENNIE K        2,628,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1998 05 05 01 2     588723       5602       6266       4998         
50434335050000011 GOODRICH FLORIDA REALTY TRUST COLEMAN JOHN J TR       61,281.00 0 VACANT                   
50434335050000012 SCHNEIDER LEONARD & LILLIAN SCHNEIDER LILLIAN       4,321,743.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 05 05 00 1    2071073       8333       8711       7819         
50434335050000020 LEHMANN GUNTHER        2,019,568.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1945 02 02 00 1       5303       1860       2054       1279         
50434335050000032 GRAU ELIZABETH TRUMP        2,563,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 2000 03 03 01 2     793358       6369       6598       6011         
50434335050000041 HARUVI ABE        1,813,528.00 0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 00 01 00 1       3242        312        312        312         
50434335050000041 HARUVI ABE        1,813,528.00 0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 04 04 01 1     126619       4229       4498       3824         
50434335050000051 MUSSER HILLARY G        4,935,324.00 0.47 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 01 2    2279218       7715       8760       6917         
50434335050000070 JBPB HOLDINGS INC        2,641,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1955 01 01 00 1      58420        811       1113        510         
50434335050000070 JBPB HOLDINGS INC        2,641,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 03 05 00 1     273485       3135       3324       3054         
50434335050000080 OELSNER VESNA        1,448,016.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1987 05 05 01 1     682147       5320       5775       4763         
50434335050000091 RIBIS NICHOLAS L & CAROL A        3,041,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 05 01 1     728657       5406       6253       4784         
50434335050000101 DEMOSS NANCY S        8,935,900.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 2    1681529       9833      12782       8889         
50434335050000101 DEMOSS NANCY S        8,935,900.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 07 01 2    2408353       7433       8504       6631         
50434335050000151 DESMOND DAVID W &        6,526,230.00 0.7748 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 06 01 2    2692177       6767       7541       6348         
50434335050000151 DESMOND DAVID W &        6,526,230.00 0.7748 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1     224145       1796       1995       1995         
50434335050000180 DLP LAND INC THE CORPORATION TRUST CO C/O       2,945,505.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1955 01 01 00 1      64558        791        952        440         
50434335050000180 DLP LAND INC THE CORPORATION TRUST CO C/O       2,945,505.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 03 03 01 2     544201       4955       4994       4994         
50434335050000191 BALASCO RUSSELL J        842,661.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1990 04 04 00 2     784493       4894       5268       4537         
50434335050000202 TRUMP DONALD J  WOODBRIDGE 000 124 WOODBRIDGE RD 721 FIFTH AVENUE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2537 2,501,908.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1980 03 03 01 1     197668       3808       4072       2950         
50434335050000203 TRUMP DONALD J  WOODBRIDGE 000 WOODBRIDGE RD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 86,250.00 0.1894 VACANT                   
50434335050000211 TRUMP DONALD J THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION C/O OCEAN 000 1094  S OCEAN BLVD 725 5TH AVE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2519 5,039,023.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 02 02 00 1     192698       1432       1612       1162         
50434335050000211 TRUMP DONALD J THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION C/O OCEAN 000 1094  S OCEAN BLVD 725 5TH AVE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2519 5,039,023.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 05 04 00 1    1671486       5492       6251       4643         
50434335050000240 BARRY MARYANNE        8,971,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 05 11 00 2    1958324       9896      10455       8269         
50434335080000010 PBC REALTY        7,245,000.00 0.69 VACANT                   
50434335080000020 M & C PROPERTIES        7,245,000.00 0.64 VACANT                   
50434335080000030 MCCARTHY JOSEPH W MCCARTHY GLORIA A       5,206,504.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 07 01 2    3606292      10438      13217       8953         
50434335080000040 TOLD WILLIAM H JR &        7,018,238.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 07 08 01 3    5763937      10739      12773       9413         
50434335080000050 KROCK PHYLLIS GARDENIA HOLDING CORP TR       5,016,855.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 05 03 2    3415884       8676      10192       7736         
50434335080000060 BREYO JOHN        3,168,804.00 0.74 VACANT                   
50434335080000071 BREYO JOHN BREYO MARILYN       7,018,723.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 01 2    3800873       9401      11041       8434         
50434335080000072 MARCELLO ROCCO A TR        14,879,218.00 1.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 07 01 1    2806903       8577       9924       7347         

Palm Beach
PCN OWNERNAME1 OWNERNAME2 STREETNAME BLK SITEADDR PADDR1 PADDR2 PADDR3 TOTTAXVAL ACRES PROPUSE CAMA-RESBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-RESBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF BEDROOMS NUMBER OF FULL BATHROOMS NUMBER OF HALF BATHROOMS STORY HEIGHT CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-RESBLD.BUILDING AREA TOTAL AREA SQUARE FOOT LIVING AREA CAMA-COMBLD.YEAR BUILT CAMA-COMBLD.EFFECTIVE YEAR NUMBER OF UNITS STORIES CONSTRUCTION TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE DESC CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING VALUE CAMA-COMBLD.BUILDING AREA COMPLEX ID COMPLEX NAME UNIT NUMBER CLASSIFICATION CODE CLASSIFICATION DESC CAMA-CONDO.YEAR BUILT AREA VALUE 
50434234010000011 PRUDDEN JEFFREY P        3,803,800.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234010000012 BLODGETT WILLIAM & BLODGETT ALICIA       8,593,576.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 2000 05 06 01 2     874681       5712       6766       5279                 
50434234010000012 BLODGETT WILLIAM & BLODGETT ALICIA       8,593,576.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 1      64162        671        877         85                 
50434234010000013 GLOGOWSKI ANTOS        3,969,321.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 06 05 02 2     957989       5957       6814       5403                 
50434234010000014 GLOGOWSKI OF PALM BEACH GLOGOWSKI KEIKO       1,601,600.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234010000041 KAYE MORT KAYE MORT REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST       1,263,450.00 0.7156 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1958 03 02 00 1      41028       3005       3634       2629                 
50434234010000042 POLLAK ANITA & HALLMAN PAULA C TR &       3,221,504.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1985 05 05 01 2    1044110       5386       6038       4924                 
50434234010000051 EIGEN ROBERT & JOAN EIGEN JOAN       2,131,575.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1990 05 05 01 2    1234447       7080       7966       6647                 
50434234010000120 DOWELL W ANTHONY        454,335.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1980 05 04 00 1     169082       3179       3368       2821                 
50434234010000130 COOK CAROLE A COOK STANLEY L       1,442,479.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 04 03 01 1     528672       3332       3597       2807                 
50434234010000140 OHL ROBERT C OHL ROBERT C TR       896,166.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 04 03 00 1     147518       2773       2999       2467                 
50434234010000150 MOUDRY VIRGINIA EST PEGGY MOUDY MITCHELL C/O       1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234010000160 ONONDAGA LLC LOWHAN MARK C/O       1,797,552.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 04 04 00 1     353319       3544       3761       3149                 
50434234010000170 SMALL M B & ANN S SMALL ANN S       538,272.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 05 04 00 1     286271       4145       4426       3917                 
50434234010000180 SHULMAN DAVID H & SHULMAN JILL       2,840,070.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    1372435       4799       5236       4372                 
50434234010000190 EVANS MITCHELL R &        954,879.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 03 00 1     266678       3693       4116       3222                 
50434234010000200 SPOTS INC        1,450,027.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1970 04 03 01 1      10027       3092       3332       2709                 
50434234010000210 MCGANN KEVIN        1,219,208.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1970 05 04 01 2     203460       3726       4051       3535                 
50434234010000220 GALDI DIANE L        1,666,953.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1985 04 03 01 2     349922       4445       4929       3231                 
50434234010000230 RAFFO RICHARD A & RAFFO ADELE F       1,041,981.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1970 04 03 01 1     252117       3410       3770       2981                 
50434234010000240 AJAX EQUITY LLC        4,143,339.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234010000250 BAUER RICHARD J & BAUER ANITA H       1,855,980.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1990 04 05 00 1     462751       4198       4363       3839                 
50434234010000260 KUVIN SANFORD F & KUVIN GABRIELLE T       2,209,867.00 1.8662 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 05 04 01 1      86677       4387       4427       4370                 
50434234010000280 OETTINGEN-SPIELBERG ALBRECHT ZU        5,526,578.00 1.1274 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 05 06 00 2     810665       5278       5930       4675                 
50434234010000290 HURWITZ ELAINE A ELAINE A HURWITZ TR TITL HLDR       3,580,329.00 1.0488 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 04 04 01 2    1269904       5447       6504       5280                 
50434234010000300 LITTLECHILD JOHN &        5,666,235.00 0.9088 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 04 04 01 2     926438       4771       5940       4300                 
50434234020000010 RICH ROBERT E JR        16,686,596.00 1.5127 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1970 05 06 00 2      52978       6308       7473       4795                 
50434234020000020 BROWNE GORDON TRUST BROWNE CHRISTOHER H TR       9,866,928.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1945 00 03 01 1      18021       3794       4667       2996                 
50434234020000031 LINDEMANN GEORGE L & LINDEMANN FRAYDA B       13,950,652.00 3.4421 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1996 05 05 01 1      34032       6155       8076       5288                 
50434234020000031 LINDEMANN GEORGE L & LINDEMANN FRAYDA B       13,950,652.00 3.4421 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 02 01 00 1       5560        806        806        806                 
50434234020000050 WILLIAMS ARTHUR L JR & ANGELA ANGELA WILLIAMS       6,864,161.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1980 05 08 00 1     266596       7110       9025       5769                 
50434234020000050 WILLIAMS ARTHUR L JR & ANGELA ANGELA WILLIAMS       6,864,161.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 05 03 00 1      53703       2824       2824       2824                 
50434234020000081 MCCARTHY FREDERICK W        5,019,067.00 0.41 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1995 05 11 01 2    1910256      10674      13144       9136                 
50434234020000082 NORTH OCEAN GST TRUST MCCARTHY DANIEL A TR ET AL       2.00 0.55 VACANT                           
50434234020000083 KAISER LYNNE M        9,896,243.00 0.77 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 2000 04 03 01 2    2276128       6097       7104       5501                 
50434234020000100 BROWNE WILLIAM H &        9,224,437.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1980 05 05 01 2     457461       5092       6046       4528                 
50434234020000110 LIMBAUGH R H HOWARD SONTAG TR TITL HLDR       24,610,084.00 2.9202 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 2001 05 06 01 2    6402555      18094      21487      16629                 
50434234020000110 LIMBAUGH R H HOWARD SONTAG TR TITL HLDR       24,610,084.00 2.9202 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2     976107       3070       3870       2117                 
50434234020000110 LIMBAUGH R H HOWARD SONTAG TR TITL HLDR       24,610,084.00 2.9202 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 02 02 00 2    1632065       5145       6404       3884                 
50434234020000130 RH TRUST & SONTAG HOWARD TR       2,101,612.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1985 04 03 00 2     647910       3404       3870       2923                 
50434234020000140 RH TRUST        1,582,751.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 04 03 00 1     132917       2415       2590       2202                 
50434234020000150 SHIPLEY ZACHARY & NICOLE SHIPLEY NICOLE       900,057.00 0.47 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1985 05 05 00 2     677091       6689       8023       5267                 
50434234020000170 KAPELMAN GILBERT & LYN KAPELMAN LYN       424,072.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1996 03 03 00 1     244910       2955       3202       2584                 
50434234020000180 BRANDON JAMES M & BRANDON NICOLE J       1,977,343.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1985 04 03 01 2     467338       4185       4341       4124                 
50434234020000180 BRANDON JAMES M & BRANDON NICOLE J       1,977,343.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 00 02 00 1      41691        767        982        264                 
50434234020000191 BEQAJ JENNIFER S        1,653,531.00 0.31 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1959 04 03 00 1     173723       3697       4095       3263                 
50434234020000210 0741459 BC LTD        1,536,655.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1988 04 03 00 1      90997       2560       2755       2276                 
50434234020000220 RAPAPORT PETER A        2,673,887.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 03 06 00 1    1365545       5714       6531       4898                 
50434234020000240 APPLE STEVEN L        3,142,436.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 05 06 00 1    1208108       5300       5848       4718                 
50434234020000260 STEPAN F QUINN & JEAN F        2,290,692.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1995 06 05 00 2     844884       3628       3961       3113                 
50434234020000270 ARABIAN BEACH LLC        1,596,236.00 0.3722 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1978 04 04 01 1     316049       3642       3900       3045                 
50434234020000270 ARABIAN BEACH LLC        1,596,236.00 0.3722 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1961 00 01 00 1      22112        401        401        401                 
50434234020000281 ARABIAN BEACH LLC        1,440,000.00 0.2968 VACANT                           
50434234020000300 REYNOLDS OLIVER A JR        416,311.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1970 03 02 00 1      44102       2404       2580       1860                 
50434234020000311 APPLE STEVEN L        3,054,083.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 04 03 01 1     889143       3376       3598       2978                 
50434234020000332 LODAR INC WILLIAM HELLER C/O       3,460,199.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 03 01 1    1264230       5233       5477       4860                 
50434234020000360 201 INDIAN ROAD LLC        1,546,167.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1990 03 02 01 2      94386       2778       3022       2688                 
50434234020000371 ZAHRINGER JAMES D &        2,595,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 2000 03 04 00 2    1485432       5430       7314       4573                 
50434234020000551 GERSTEIN JOANN GERSTEIN TRUST HLDR       409,445.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 02 02 01 1      73602       2269       2393       2027                 
50434234020000552 SWEENEY FRANCES & FRAENKEL FRANCIS       1,601,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 03 03 00 1     206593       1932       2066       1874                 
50434234020000561 WALSH NANCY S TRUST        1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234020000571 WALSH NANCY S & NANCY S WALSH TR HLDR       3,899,701.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 05 07 00 2    1475229       9158       9865       8245                 
50434234020000600 NEIMAN ANITA N & ANITA N NEIMAN TR TITL HLDR       2,805,899.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 07 00 2    1453167       6520       8250       5829                 
50434234020000611 HUNTER MICHAEL & HUNTER KATHERINE G       2,369,112.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1965 04 03 00 2     253456       4354       4700       4092                 
50434234020000631 OHANNESSIAN ANTOINE        1,858,975.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 04 03 01 2     413935       3181       3625       2703                 
50434234020000641 LUTZ EDWARD C & LAURIE S        1,609,668.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1964 04 03 01 1     158683       3176       3448       2807                 
50434234020000771 SEASIDE PARTNERS LLC        1,875,657.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1995 03 03 00 2     424706       4009       4503       3495                 
50434234020000772 CARLINO PETER D & ELIZABETH        1,585,498.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 03 03 01 1     137535       2465       2475       2461                 
50434234020000781 ACKERMAN JUDITH A & ACKERMAN LEONARD I       1,929,289.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 00 03 00 1     486439       2219       2430       1582                 
50434234020000791 MARIX YVELYNE D MARIX YVELYNE D TR       781,877.00 0.56 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1970 04 03 01 1     207818       3728       4812       3064                 
50434234020000820 NAZARIAN NIAZ & NAZARIAN FATEMEH       413,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1985 04 02 00 1     108850       2333       2422       2157                 
50434234020000831 THOMPSON JAMES R        573,732.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1970 04 03 01 1     210517       3855       4415       3272                 
50434234020000841 GRIFFIS NIXON        346,855.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 03 03 00 1      13794       2558       3042       1884                 
50434234020000860 BEUTTENMULLER D J JR & MARILYN BEUTTENMULLER MARILYN       643,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1947 00 01 00 1      46684        836        984        432                 
50434234020000860 BEUTTENMULLER D J JR & MARILYN BEUTTENMULLER MARILYN       643,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1970 04 03 01 2     171385       2917       3000       2664                 
50434234020000950 GOODRICH E W & DOROTHY P GOODRICH DOROTHY P       390,767.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 04 02 00 1     134726       2532       2677       2230                 
50434234020000961 BUCK DOUGLAS J & LINDSAY BOBBIE D       1,238,593.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1957 02 02 00 1      41858        963       1043        928                 
50434234020000961 BUCK DOUGLAS J & LINDSAY BOBBIE D       1,238,593.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 02 00 1     150476       2796       3077       2096                 
50434234020000980 KEMBLE WILLIAM T JR        312,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 03 03 00 1      88766       1860       1945       1897                 
50434234020000990 REED ALISON V        284,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 03 02 00 2      94649       1931       1931       1931                 
50434234020001000 GAVIGAN JAMES C        363,012.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1975 04 03 01 2     277086       2798       2892       2748                 
50434234020001010 BAKER FRANCES M        1,754,942.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1975 02 01 00 1      10515        204        204        204                 
50434234020001010 BAKER FRANCES M        1,754,942.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1990 04 03 00 1     337597       2376       2569       2054                 
50434234020001020 VAN ZANDT TATIANA        1,246,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 03 02 00 1      18016       1332       1590       1215                 
50434234020001031 WAGNER JOHN F TRUST WAGNER SUZANNE H TRUST       1,177,393.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 03 01 00 1        953       1399       1476       1365                 
50434234020001032 PASKIN DAVID I &        1,568,256.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1970 03 04 00 1     122974       2460       2907       1944                 
50434234020001080 PATUSH LLC        1,158,787.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1965 03 02 00 1       5352       2085       2287       1628                 
50434234020001090 MCDONALD SCOTT MCDONALD SCOTT TR       1,619,785.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1995 04 03 00 1     218876       2803       3079       2722                 
50434234020001100 PEREZ REGINE S        355,040.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 03 03 00 1     123787       2514       2722       2035                 
50434234020001110 ROGERS PELL S III & MARY L ROGERS MARY L       378,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 03 03 00 1     155594       2925       3159       2627                 
50434234020001120 ZISKA MAURA        1,700,083.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2     421434       3666       4223       3229                 
50434234030000460 BARRON LISBETH R        8,711,888.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 05 02 2    2891149       7033       7896       6480                 
50434234030000461 LUTER JOSEPH W III &        11,314,493.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 07 01 2    3714337       8985      10933       7547                 
50434234030000471 BEAL BRUCE A & BRUCE A BEAL ET AL TR HLDRS       4,564,024.00 0.32 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 06 06 02 2    2394409       8553       9490       7924                 
50434234030000472 FROMSON LORRIE & FROMSOM SHELDON       2,442,843.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 05 07 00 2     681902       5881       6218       5338                 
50434234030000491 JENKINS DAVID J        2,160,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234030000510 BOOMHOWER ROBERT C BOOMHOWER ROBERT C TR       1,930,216.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1951 00 03 01 2      21835       2608       2819       2486                 
50434234030000510 BOOMHOWER ROBERT C BOOMHOWER ROBERT C TR       1,930,216.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 00 01 00 2       3980        447        534        264                 
50434234030000660 HOLLAND THOMAS L TR CALDWELL MANLEY P TR       972,991.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 05 04 01 2     442919       3384       3662       2862                 
50434234030000671 LAZZARA RICHARD J KOCHMAN RONALD S TR       10,346,735.00 1.43 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 03 02 00 2    1348692       3557       4754       2091                 
50434234030000671 LAZZARA RICHARD J KOCHMAN RONALD S TR       10,346,735.00 1.43 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 06 02 2    3434069       9063      11538       8346                 
50434234030000680 BAUER RICHARD C & BAUER VERONICA R S       3,021,252.00 0.3074 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 06 01 2    1542041       4596       5370       4098                 
50434234030000691 LIDO LLC        4,401,318.00 0.3421 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 02 2    2912965       5016       5847       4424                 
50434234030000710 HARBACH WILLIAM O HARBACH WILLIAM O TR       531,205.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 03 03 00 1     128584       2336       2426       2127                 
50434234030000721 DUPUIS PAMELLA J & PETER A DUPUIS H/W       650,699.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 05 01 1    1028443       4855       7307       3983                 
50434234030000741 BEATY KEITH &        11,045,786.00 0.98 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 07 01 2    3612796       9104      11280       7867                 
50434234030000751 HEITZMAN EVAN W &        14,079,616.00 0.7674 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1995 05 07 01 2    1848106       9783      11908       7274                 
50434234030000752 CARIBBEAN 318 LLC        12,973,229.00 0.7783 VACANT 1940 1965 05 04 01 1      31729       7107       7810       6362                 
50434234030000891 MOTTOLA THOMAS D & MIRANDA ARIADNA S       2,160,000.00 0.4465 VACANT                           
50434234030000910 1510 NORTH LAKE WAY LLC        1,189,469.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 04 03 00 1       5038       1616       2100       1348                 
50434234030000921 WESTPORT PALM BEACH LLC RABIDEAU GUY C/O       1,478,009.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1955 03 02 00 1      37745       1740       1956       1474                 
50434234030000932 MICHEL GEORGE J JR & PAULINE M MICHEL PAULINE M       2,863,656.00 0.63 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1997 04 06 01 2    1211604       8164       9186       7330                 
50434234030000940 CONROY MARTIN A & GEM PROP MGMT INC C/O       1,447,318.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 04 02 00 1       7318       2180       2451       1763                 
50434234030001050 KRAMER R E III & CHRISTINA K        457,514.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1964 04 02 00 1     201436       2687       2866       2299                 
50434234030001071 MARQUES DE OLASO JAVIER        1,198,884.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1961 04 03 00 2      10884       3383       4225       2883                 
50434234030001072 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.04 MUNICIPAL                           
50434234030001131 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.1 MUNICIPAL           1982 1982 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      48520        893         
50434234030001160 FOSTER WILLIAM O        1,433,564.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1995 05 04 01 2     950504       3989       4286       3680                 
50434234030001170 WINCHESTER VALERIE J        8,721,615.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 04 01 1.5    2441431       6328       6894       5872                 
50434234030001180 WRIGHT ROBERT C & WRIGHT SUZANNE W       8,466,434.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1998 01 01 00 1      70546        568        789        513                 
50434234030001180 WRIGHT ROBERT C & WRIGHT SUZANNE W       8,466,434.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1998 03 03 01 2    1564974       6833       7859       5890                 
50434234040000010 GAINES STANLEY N & GAINES GAY H       14,304,274.00 1.7037 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 03 00 1     177065       2130       2164       2115                 
50434234040000010 GAINES STANLEY N & GAINES GAY H       14,304,274.00 1.7037 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 04 03 01 1      18133       2386       2541       2057                 
50434234040000020 GAINES STANLEY N        978,043.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1965 03 03 00 1      17675       1678       1962       1603                 
50434234040000070 ROSOW DAVID A & DAVID & JEAN ROSOW ET AL TR HLDRS       8,209,717.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 1    2673507      10250      13210       8678                 
50434234040000080 KELLER FRED TR        8,208,200.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234040000090 PHIPPS OGDEN M & PHIPPS ANDREA       6,939,109.00 1.2668 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 05 09 00 2    1661863      10589      12398       9405                 
50434234040000090 PHIPPS OGDEN M & PHIPPS ANDREA       6,939,109.00 1.2668 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 00 02 00 1      23493        390        390        390                 
50434234040000100 WILKENS FRANK & WILKENS MAUREEN       34,117,940.00 2.7694 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 06 09 01 2    6809592      19907      23259      14496                 
50434234050000011 RIGGIO LEONARD & RIGGIO LOUISE       22,492,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 2000 05 07 01 1    2339384       9255      11042       8005                 
50434234050000012 RIGGIO LEONARD & RIGGIO LOUISE       1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234050000013 GAINES STANLEY N & GAINES GAY H       5.00 0.0151 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434234050000050 MESSING ELSA S MESSING ELSA S TR       387,000.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 04 03 00 1     141058       2653       2877       2652                 
50434234050000100 GARY W BRADFORD GARY SUSAN K       581,663.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 03 02 00 1     133870       2328       2420       2112                 
50434234050000110 NOSKA CHERYL C        299,024.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1965 04 02 00 1      40058       1635       1791       1428                 
50434234050000120 PLATANIA FRANCES & PLATANIA JULIE &       984,509.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1965 03 02 00 1       6549       2107       2209       1894                 
50434234050000130 DELANEY KATHY M        415,307.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1985 04 03 00 1     345903       2646       2950       2218                 
50434234050000140 ROWAN NINA        1,623,103.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 03 02 00 1     172762       2053       2302       1854                 
50434234050000150 BAERST JOHN S 2002 REV TRUST FEDERAL MARITAL TRUST EST TRUST       1,227,109.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1975 03 02 00 1       6209       1864       2023       1371                 
50434234050000160 VEITH WALTER & W & MOIRA E VEITH TR TI HLDR       312,478.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1960 03 02 00 1      66452       2259       2501       1859                 
50434234050000170 CALL JOHN S JR        539,803.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1990 04 04 00 1     202997       3639       4105       2315                 
50434234050000180 FERNANDEZ ROBERT &        1,552,591.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 03 03 00 2     158894       2807       2873       2783                 
50434234050000190 SCOTT JOEL &        701,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 00 1     133807       2516       2760       2070                 
50434234050000200 TUCKER DANIEL & ELAINA L TUCKER ELAINA L       389,148.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 04 03 00 1     443157       3315       3454       3025                 
50434234050000220 GOODSTEIN FLA LLC        2,882,387.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     690363       4513       4889       4063                 
50434234050000241 KELLER FRED KELLER FRED TR TITL HLDR       16,225,190.00 0.84 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1975 05 06 00 1     897384       9248      10563       8442                 
50434234050000241 KELLER FRED KELLER FRED TR TITL HLDR       16,225,190.00 0.84 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1975 02 01 00 1      91466        887       1044        820                 
50434234050000250 1494 N LAKE WAY LLC        9,955,920.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 05 05 02 1    1778159       6808       8127       5595                 
50434234060000010 NOONAN MOLLY H & BARBARA M SULLIVAN       332,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1980 03 02 00 1     117587       2177       2393       1632                 
50434234060000020 COVINGTON CONSTANCE R        1,452,174.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 03 02 01 1      12174       1921       2518       1674                 
50434234060000030 WEITZMAN CANDEE        479,012.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1973 02 02 00 1      16499       1234       1280       1253                 
50434234060000040 DOTTERRER JOHN C        344,777.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 03 00 1     125946       2611       2845       2096                 
50434234060000050 MYERS JAMES L        272,884.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 03 02 00 1      59763       1770       1858       1720                 
50434234060000060 LEIDY ROBERT P        383,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1970 03 02 00 1     117576       2162       2256       1944                 
50434234060000070 WESTON GEORGE V III WESTON LAURA C       457,862.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 04 03 01 1     121650       2293       2453       2081                 
50434234060000080 GAMMINO SUSAN A        319,197.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1970 03 03 00 1       4809       1808       2189       1608                 
50434234070000011 AINSLEY VENTURES LLC        1,601,822.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1990 03 03 01 2     687416       3730       4026       3386                 
50434234070000012 SCHRAM RONALD Y        1,415,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1990 05 05 01 2     616866       5725       6289       5175                 
50434234070000013 LIGRESTI DOMINICK J        3,177,447.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 04 03 00 1     277973       3432       3828       3003                 
50434234070000021 VISCONTI JOSEPH C        2,279,628.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1985 04 03 01 1     209712       2662       3103       2191                 
50434234070000022 WILKES HELEN        574,785.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1985 04 04 00 2     282787       3590       3803       3279                 
50434234070000030 SCHULTZ MICHAEL & SCHULTZ LISA       6,848,679.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1956 05 05 01 3     315347       6243       7385       6173                 
50434234070000040 SILVERMAN RONALD D SILVERMAN MIRIAM W       1,507,165.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 04 03 01 1     178504       3323       3578       2899                 
50434234070000050 ALBERGO NICHOLAS &        2,467,568.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 06 00 2    1008516       4598       5572       4074                 
50434234070000060 FAWCETT MICHAEL S        1,440,510.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 04 04 00 1     135731       2552       2898       2216                 
50434234070000070 BEALL HUNTER B &        1,399,057.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 04 03 00 1       9057       2906       3320       2424                 
50434234070000080 B 17 LLC        1,921,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 02 02 01 1     471108       2436       2872       1970                 
50434234070000090 ROOKS VANESSA L        1,584,646.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1995 04 03 00 1     139597       2374       2539       2043                 
50434234070000100 WEST GROUP RESIDENTIAL LLC        1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234070000110 JAFFE PETER K TR        1,556,542.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1970 04 03 00 1     116542       2411       2740       2296                 
50434234070000120 METZGER ANNE G        490,193.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1975 04 03 00 2     188333       3550       3766       3263                 
50434234070000130 LEAS LILLIAN P        531,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1960 02 01 00 1      40248        796        842        776                 
50434234070000130 LEAS LILLIAN P        531,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 03 02 00 1      91477       1883       1950       1681                 
50434234070000140 LINCK ROBERT F        441,368.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1950 02 01 00 1      13542        280        420        220                 
50434234070000140 LINCK ROBERT F        441,368.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1950 03 03 00 1      20338       1567       1855       1271                 
50434234070000150 CASANMAR TRUST & BRAITHWAITE WILLIAM J TR       1,935,752.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 03 01 1     465193       3301       3803       2852                 
50434234070000160 COLE JEFFREY A &        1,081,074.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1987 03 03 00 1     412826       2919       3098       2531                 
50434234070000170 BEA JUDITH        0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 05 04 01 2     563470       4402       4624       3978                 
50434234070000180 GARVY ROBERT A &        2,825,956.00 0.6453 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 03 05 01 2    1037978       5977       6819       5305                 
50434234070000190 LESOWITZ SIDNEY A LESOWITZ SIDNEY A TR       884,380.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1989 04 03 01 1     739484       3331       3560       2838                 
50434234070000200 PERRY DONALD R III & PERRY DAYNA L       1,440,000.00 0.264 VACANT                           
50434234070000210 BIERLY L E JR & BIERLY & DRAKE ASSOCIATES C/O       1,440,168.00 0.264 VACANT                           
50434234070000220 BARASCH MICHAEL P & BOTTITTA BARASCH NATALIE       1,408,995.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1970 04 03 00 1       7617       2481       2640       2137                 
50434234070000230 GARRIGUES JENNIFER C        592,623.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1970 04 02 00 1     121290       2299       2611       1985                 
50434234070000241 DE ROSIERE HARRIET DEROSIERE ROLAND  D TRUST       366,487.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1978 04 03 00 1     105324       2512       2624       2250                 
50434234070000251 MMEP LLC C/O CHRISTOPHER CURTIS       13,101,778.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 01 1    3811601       7982       9512       6653                 
50434234070000261 JAFFE P KEVIN JAFFE P KEVIN TR       8,995,161.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 04 06 01 2    3211631       7894      10159       6705                 
50434234070000262 MARKIN SUSAN        9,596,795.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1995 04 06 01 2    1598407       6707       7476       6490                 
50434234070000262 MARKIN SUSAN        9,596,795.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1995 03 04 01 2     367188       4436       5973       3276                 
50434234080000011 GANNON J TIMOTHY        3,576,407.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 2000 04 04 01 2     421471       3665       4078       3305                 
50434234080000012 DE GRAY WILLIAM G JR        711,975.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1975 03 03 00 1      82480       2087       2428       1574                 
50434234080000020 SARKIS JOLENE S        3,475,605.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 04 04 01 3     747042       6385       7177       4993                 
50434234080000030 REESE D V        4,484,843.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 03 03 00 1    3046259       7169       8074       5896                 
50434234080000040 DELPHIN CORP WINTHROP ET AL C/O       3,079,125.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234080000050 DELPHIN CORPORATION        5,710,732.00 0 VACANT                           
50434234080000070 STOLLOF MARCIE S        1,566,914.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 2000 02 02 00 2     940277       3838       4033       3465                 
50434234080000071 NORTH SHORE BEACH CLUB INC J CROSSEN C/O       9,404.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434234080000080 NICOLETTE ANTHONY J JR &        1,530,742.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 03 00 1     140368       2670       2940       2320                 
50434234080000090 ROBERTSON H M JR & BARBARA B ROBERTSON BARBARA B       489,141.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 05 04 00 2     178928       3370       3640       3020                 
50434234080000100 SATTER JOAN G TR        489,436.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 03 03 00 1     128267       2384       2472       2178                 
50434234080000110 THOMPSON GERARD M & BARBARA W BARBARA W THOMPSON       496,822.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1975 03 03 00 1     126414       2372       2551       1688                 
50434234080000120 HOLT RICHARD D        392,704.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 03 02 00 1     100693       2161       2334       1901                 
50434234080000130 PAINE RUTH B        486,821.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1975 03 03 00 1     164236       2899       2995       2675                 
50434234080000140 DERRIN SCOTT & DERRIN MICHELLE R       1,419,700.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 04 03 01 1     202376       3498       3758       3108                 
50434234080000150 AMLING JEFFREY S        1,148,904.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1985 03 03 00 1     486244       2812       2951       2489                 
50434234080000160 KAUFMAN BRADFORD D & JILL E JILLE KAUFMAN       593,405.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 04 03 00 2     520804       3650       4013       3296                 
50434234080000170 AIKEN ANDREW M AIKEN KHOOSHE A       641,400.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 01 02 00 1     132166       2450       2549       2264                 
50434234080000180 PANGIA THOMAS J & ISABELLE PANGIA ISABELLE       560,919.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 04 05 00 2     202954       3336       3646       2874                 
50434234080000190 HEINS RALPH & CORNELIA        1,563,258.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 00 1     114120       2242       2385       1994                 
50434234080000200 ONE NINETEEN REALTY TRUST SMITH JEFFERY W TR       1,472,468.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1990 03 02 00 1      21468       2022       2401       1513                 
50434234080000210 CROSSEN DONNA        602,936.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1995 04 05 00 1     215483       3375       3634       3004                 
50434234080000220 BURDETT A C & EMMY J BURDETT EMMY J       703,544.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1980 05 03 01 2     453322       4169       5123       3307                 
50434234080000230 BUSSEY VIRGINIA O JR & E O BUSSEY E O       513,442.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1963 04 03 00 1     108616       3316       3929       2871                 
50434234080000240 BYLIN ERIC M &        1,070,601.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 03 01 2     305972       3965       4365       3579                 
50434234080000250 MCDONALD JOHN R & MCDONALD KATHRYN F       914,821.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 04 03 01 1     167847       2898       3048       2356                 
50434234080000260 B S CUNNINGHAM TRUST LYDIAN PRIVATE BK & CYTHLEN MADDOCK TRS       2,219,171.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1995 04 03 00 2     770980       4321       4677       4113                 
50434234080000270 FOSTER VARICK P & FOSTER ALANE B       2,105,752.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2     796558       4557       4860       4097                 
50434234080000280 HEINER PAUL T & HEINER SYLVIA K       1,805,458.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 04 03 01 2    1043187       4427       4621       4055                 
50434234080000290 KLAINE KATHERINE S        1,704,624.00 0.5062 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 04 01 2     931119       4893       5597       4345                 
50434234080000310 CASSIDY JOHN C JR        1,476,465.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1990 04 03 00 1     174308       3313       3642       2899                 
50434234080000320 PECORI HELEN W        1,046,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 2000 03 03 00 1     649037       3387       4262       2932                 
50434234080000330 HENDERSON GUY L        1,574,656.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 03 02 00 1     120515       2148       2277       1835                 
50434234080000340 BURNY JOAN ABBOTT JOAN ABBOTT BURNY TR TITL HLDR       688,689.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1987 03 03 01 1     311525       3776       3955       3397                 
50434234080000350 120 REEF ROAD LLC        1,527,882.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1966 04 03 01 1      56699       2378       2666       1806                 
50434234080000360 LEVEY SPENCER & PATRICIA PATRICIA LEVEY       600,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 03 03 00 1     129947       2323       2436       2137                 
50434234080000370 STEPAN BONNIE W & STEPAN JOHN A       1,215,111.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 01 1     149237       2831       3402       1883                 
50434234080000380 AZQUETA JESUS J & AZQUETA MARY W       790,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 01 1     142692       3552       3748       3139                 
50434234080000390 FIFIELD J MATTHEW & NORWOOD ELIZABETH P       2,127,041.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 2000 04 04 00 2     671840       4385       5088       3749                 
50434234080000400 160 REEF ROAD LLC        1,490,916.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1960 04 03 01 1      44306       3380       3519       3100                 
50434234080000410 POMFRET PAUL        972,867.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 04 03 00 1     429604       3247       3445       2838                 
50434234080000420 MORGAN ELSBETH W        1,545,673.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 03 02 00 1      52239       2190       2438       1755                 
50434234080000420 MORGAN ELSBETH W        1,545,673.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1963 00 01 00 1      38280        668        748        633                 
50434234080000430 GINGRAS PAUL & SARA J GINGRAS SARA J       482,798.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1985 04 03 00 1     546932       2862       3358       2335                 
50434234080000440 PETERSEN GAYLE P GAYLE P PETERSEN TR TITL HLDR       874,439.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1995 03 02 00 1     155041       2385       2464       2200                 
50434234080000450 HRUDA DAVID &        1,450,567.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 03 03 01 1       6869       2039       2480       1904                 
50434234080000460 ROSE LAURA L        1,592,443.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 04 03 00 1     146080       2807       2953       2465                 
50434234080000470 KARSTROM MARY A        387,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 03 02 00 1      59238       2132       2302       1882                 
50434234090000023 111 SEAGATE VENTURE LLC        1,572,417.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 04 03 00 1     127033       2388       2750       1906                 
50434234090000043 DELPHIN CORP MARYANN BERNARD C/O       1,668,122.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 03 03 00 2     217658       3990       4179       3579                 
50434234090000063 HACK BRADFORD H &        1,610,009.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1961 04 03 01 2     169690       3359       3649       2853                 
50434234100000051 LORELLO ROBERT J LORELLO ANITA       2,746,291.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 04 01 2     391940       4435       4893       3907                 
50434234100000062 KENAN STERLING H        9,846,552.00 0.7377 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 03 00 1       8525       2328       2345       2321                 
50434234100000072 TAJA REALTY TRUST C/O PAPPAS PROPERTIES INC       13,363,350.00 0.819 VACANT                           
50434234100000090 JENKINS DAVID J & SKUBAL RICHARD B       9,218,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1995 04 05 00 2    1191259       6642       7972       5708                 
50434234100000170 AQUA DEVELOPMENT N LAKE LLC        12,064,254.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 07 08 02 2    2344314       7855      10320       6266                 
50434234100000180 READ JAMES A & MEZZANINE MANAGEMENT C/O       11,110,745.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 00 2    1447312       7194       8178       6444                 
50434234110000010 SHADOWCORP HOLDINGS INC        6,266,761.00 0.51 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1988 05 04 00 2    1001588       6376       7179       5826                 
50434234110000020 AUDITORE EDWARD L EDWARD L AUDITORE TR TITL HLDR       420,417.00 0.26 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 04 03 01 1     147645       2917       3121       2494                 
50434234110000030 ALEXANDER BEULAH L        1,011,799.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 03 02 00 1     107889       2164       2462       1920                 
50434234110000040 LEIDY CARTER R III & CARTER R LEIDY III TR TITL HLDR       1,271,421.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1985 04 04 00 1     338083       3357       3862       2779                 
50434234110000050 LONGO VIRGINIA C        517,865.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 04 03 01 1     202280       3730       4486       3068                 
50434234110000060 HILTON BIRGITT K        2,076,717.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 04 03 01 2     630125       3992       4222       3522                 
50434234110000070 GOODWIN ALAN R & SARA GOODWIN SARA       545,830.00 0.27 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1968 04 03 01 2     198826       3642       4190       3161                 
50434234110000080 PUFFENBARGER KIMBERLY & PUFFENBARGER PAUL       1,135,136.00 0.28 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 03 01 2     445557       3853       4158       3310                 
50434234110000090 FORMAN MARCIA L        385,109.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 03 00 1      60398       2964       3390       2371                 
50434234110000100 FLORIDA OSCEOLA LLC        1,448,180.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 04 03 00 1       8180       2676       2906       2225                 
50434234110000110 KATONA JOHN &        465,013.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 04 03 00 1     226925       3131       3318       2754                 
50434234110000120 AGAR BELINDA A        1,663,830.00 0.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1995 04 04 01 2     804052       4262       4608       3790                 
50434234110000130 VOLLMAN ROSANNE T & VOLLMAN DENNIS P       1,568,804.00 0.26 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 03 01 1     170125       3362       3678       2912                 
50434234110000141 SULMAN RICHARD D SULMAN HELEN M TR       976,204.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 04 03 01 1     194334       3936       4326       3116                 
50434234110000142 VAN DER GRIFT JOAN R        1,782,029.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1990 04 02 00 1     341854       3792       4114       3051                 
50434234140000010 ROUSSEAU MARIA A        1,817,188.00 0.29 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1995 04 04 01 2     734728       4745       5593       4146                 
50434234140000020 XYZ LTD F BLISSETT C/O       2,416,664.00 0.25 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 04 05 01 2     965565       5197       6207       4546                 
50434234140000030 LEAVITT DAVID & LEAVITT GAIL       639,052.00 0.26 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 04 04 01 2     242061       2891       3079       2508                 
50434234140000040 MASON ALLEN & ZELDA P MASON ZELDA P       674,379.00 0.25 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 04 03 01 1     589367       3477       3694       3120                 
50434234140000050 KRASNOW ROBERT & LANTZ NADA       2,991,847.00 0.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1995 05 05 01 2    1593484       5964       6748       5280                 
50434234140010000 VIA MANANA HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PHILIP S STEEL TR C/O       0.00 0.22 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434302000010011 1100 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD TRUST FISCHMAN STEVEN S TR       16,995,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 10 01 3    4321340      11547      15964      10115                 
50434302000010020 CASTLE JOHN K & CASTLE MARIANNE S       16,577,726.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1997 02 02 00 2     124324       1610       2000       1000                 
50434302000010020 CASTLE JOHN K & CASTLE MARIANNE S       16,577,726.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1997 05 07 01 2    2286351      10606      12023       9747                 
50434302000010020 CASTLE JOHN K & CASTLE MARIANNE S       16,577,726.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 2     167720       1119       1324        587                 
50434302000010030 KRAUSE KAREN PEARLMAN SAMUEL S TR       15,007,433.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 05 07 01 2    4828126      10168      12700       8759                 
50434302000010031 MANDEL MORTON L        6,211,371.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1990 05 07 01 2    3095217      12040      13576      10224                 
50434302010000011 KOHL SIDNEY & DOROTHY L KOHL       347,533.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 01 01 00 1      54008        525        525        525                 
50434302010000012 177 QUEENS LANE LLC        1,800.00 0 VACANT                           
50434302010000013 THORSTAD JANICE L        496,376.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1985 04 03 00 2     417166       3088       3526       2435                 
50434302010000014 CONIGLIO FRANK S & CONIGLIO GAIL L       3,825,779.00 0.03 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1995 05 05 01 2    1137070       5210       5959       4508                 
50434302010000015 MIMUN CLEMENT C & LAUREN E MIMUN H/W       1,873,073.00 0.66 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 10 01 3    1104236       9326      11544       6936                 
50434302010000021 BROBERG STEWART C        755,760.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1975 04 03 00 2      39663       3126       3687       2973                 
50434302010000022 WAGNER JOE        2,885,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1996 05 03 01 2    1071435       4374       5098       3926                 
50434302010000050 BEACH HILDA M        819,181.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 03 02 00 1     109091       2051       2393       1766                 
50434302010000060 ASPLUNDH EDWARD K &        2,746,226.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 04 01 2    1318717       4581       5416       4085                 
50434302010000070 COFFIELD TIMOTHY COFFIELD MARIA ELENA       669,700.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 03 00 1     173317       3144       3293       3012                 
50434302010000080 BENOIT ELLEN T        478,981.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1990 04 03 00 1     394977       2987       3459       2777                 
50434302010000090 LINDSAY BARBARA & LINDSAY ALAN       465,915.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 04 03 00 2     186082       3375       3663       3092                 
50434302010000100 FRANKEL THOMAS FRANKEL MARIETTA       927,574.00 0.5725 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1995 05 04 00 2     553809       4811       6047       3598                 
50434302010000120 WYETT ALLEN S & CAROL N WYETT CAROL N       4,517,950.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 06 01 2    2498722      12159      13711      11000                 
50434302010000130 LERNER DANIEL M & ELAINE G TRUST LERNER ELAINE G TRUSTEE       8,403,369.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 04 01 1    1188688       4095       4489       3597                 
50434302010000140 FANJUL MARIA C & MARIA C FANJUL TR TITL HLDR       3,653,609.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 05 06 00 2    1229570       7156       8855       5665                 
50434302010000160 GRANT HELEN K TRUST RICHARD GRANT III & GAIL SLINGLUFF TR       1,688,054.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 04 04 00 2     242648       3561       3690       3366                 
50434302010000170 MILLER BERNICE C        1,586,143.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1980 04 03 00 1     139941       2630       2954       2174                 
50434302010000180 CALHOUN ROBERT B & PULITZER LIZA D       2,954,969.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1990 04 03 01 2     188772       3349       3997       3070                 
50434302010000190 MORRIS ALLEN L & MORRIS DONNA L       994,769.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1980 04 03 00 2     348323       3587       3723       3408                 
50434302010000200 DURACH FAMILY LTD        1,681,270.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 03 02 00 2     228776       2470       2648       2087                 
50434302010000210 DURACH FAMILY LTD        1,377,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434302010000220 STEWART SHARON N & ELLIS MICHEL S TR       427,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1965 04 03 01 1     141608       2528       2971       2260                 
50434302010000230 OCEAN WAY LLC        1,449,616.00 0 VACANT                           
50434302010000240 METTLER T M & SARAH J METTLER SARAH J       745,653.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 03 00 1      64428       4323       4767       3885                 
50434302010000290 MURRAY JOHN B JR        320,775.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 03 03 00 1       8733       1675       1718       1706                 
50434302010000300 CARLINO DAVID E & CARLINO MARY J       1,630,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1995 04 03 00 1     175797       2470       2663       2151                 
50434302010000310 OCEAN WAY LLC        1,656,074.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 04 03 01 1     214677       3947       4363       3703                 
50434302010000320 SETTEMBRE MARK J        2,073,234.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1995 03 03 00 1     615924       2607       2744       2288                 
50434302010000330 KOONTZ FLORENCE H        492,626.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 03 00 1     176546       3238       3637       3133                 
50434302010000340 GERSCHEL PATRICK GERSCHEL & COMPANY INC C/O       2,183,571.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 03 00 2     732770       3375       3586       3015                 
50434302010000350 FISCHER RHODA S        1,760,580.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 02 01 1     302872       3321       3745       2851                 
50434302010000370 GIVENS TIMOTHY &        2,455,343.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 04 06 00 2    1039797       5390       5981       4822                 
50434302010000380 PORTER JACK A        521,730.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1975 04 03 01 1     180939       3410       3684       2795                 
50434302010000391 SAGE ANDREW G C III TRUST        6,707,523.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 2000 05 06 01 3    1136952       6140       7008       5324                 
50434302010000392 DILLER SALLY A DILLER SALLY A TR       1,822,230.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1944 1965 04 04 01 2      14202       2977       3444       2435                 
50434302010000400 RHODES JESS F & EDITH RHODES H/W       455,490.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1970 04 03 00 1     167822       2908       3139       2483                 
50434302010000410 271 LA PUERTA LLC & 271 LA PUERTA II LLC       2,429,361.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 05 06 01 2     966557       4971       5931       4550                 
50434302010000420 MCCREERY LAWRENCE K JR        418,330.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1960 04 03 00 1     126093       2415       2636       2181                 
50434302010000430 FLAGG JOHN E III FLAGG CATHERINE J       1,195,238.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 05 01 2    1319894       4600       5145       4117                 
50434302010000440 HITT PAUL J & HITT SUSAN B       1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434302010000450 RODMAN RICHARD H RICHARD H RODMAN TR TITL HLDR       816,212.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 03 01 2     884512       3932       4298       3534                 
50434302010000460 HOGAN HARRIET V C        349,563.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 04 03 00 1      42201       1777       1950       1545                 
50434302010000470 AVIS WARREN E JR & DEBORAH K AVIS DEBORAH K       404,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 04 02 00 1     130275       2107       2166       2082                 
50434302010000480 COSTA MARK J & COSTA GITA M       1,394,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1955 04 02 00 1        557       2141       2202       2100                 
50434302010000490 BAUER RICHARD C &        853,929.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1960 02 01 00 1      35631        639        662        662                 
50434302010000490 BAUER RICHARD C &        853,929.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1975 04 03 00 1     106637       2014       2024       2000                 
50434303000040010 KOHL SIDNEY & SIDNEY KOHL TR TITL HLDR       4,543,154.00 1.0269 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 00 01 00 1      35881        348        630        144                 
50434303000040010 KOHL SIDNEY & SIDNEY KOHL TR TITL HLDR       4,543,154.00 1.0269 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 05 06 01 2    1955791      10485      11832       9567                 
50434303000040030 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.1 MUNICIPAL           1982 1982 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      70830       1500         
50434303010000011 BRYAN F WILLIAM & BRYAN NOEL REBECCA       3,757,765.00 0.47 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2    1184244       4644       5333       4057                 
50434303010000013 RODDY III EDWARD U        412,135.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1960 04 03 01 2     109313       3257       3510       2968                 
50434303010000020 KAYWELL JOHN JOHN & MARGARET KAYWELL TR HLDRS       853,798.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1985 04 03 00 1     237138       2627       2806       2245                 
50434303020000010 SHEROUQ LLC        14,062,353.00 0.78 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 08 00 2    2137797       8341      10145       7032                 
50434303020000021 ASPLUNDH CHRISTOPHER FAMILY        7,044,395.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1990 05 04 01 2     920604       4616       5170       4436                 
50434303020000021 ASPLUNDH CHRISTOPHER FAMILY        7,044,395.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 02 02 00 1     100773       1308       1551        902                 
50434303020000022 SAILFISH CLUB OF FLORIDA INC        5,500,000.00 3.0229 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1935 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     979510      29427         
50434303030000010 PONVERT WARREN N PONVERT WARREN N TR       505,545.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 00 1     134216       2269       2454       1694                 
50434303030000020 240 ANGLER AVENUE LLC        1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303030000030 STEVENS MARK        1,930,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 03 00 1.5     525803       3642       3955       2626                 
50434303030000040 KOLLER HELMUT        1,487,707.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1960 02 03 00 1      92250       2616       3036       1674                 
50434303030000050 SEASIDE PARTNERS LLC BARNES LARRY   C/O       1,769,301.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 03 03 01 1     323964       3098       3485       2441                 
50434303030000060 MORRIS EILEEN L        424,323.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 03 00 1     128188       2546       3056       2126                 
50434303030000070 BRESNAN FRANCIS X & BRESNAN EILEEN       1,637,441.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 05 04 01 1     189748       3567       3806       3176                 
50434303030000081 CHU J MICHAEL & CHU ELIZABETH K       4,057,070.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1985 05 04 01 2     543539       5060       5375       4751                 
50434303030000082 MACARI STEPHEN J        1,548,785.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 02 01 00 1      32850        638        750        375                 
50434303030000082 MACARI STEPHEN J        1,548,785.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 03 02 00 1      75935       1749       1835       1655                 
50434303030000091 SMITH STEPHEN C & SMITH AUSTIN A       1,986,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1990 04 04 00 2     589524       4422       4902       3972                 
50434303030000092 EASTERWOOD MARK        5,460,959.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 04 01 2    1958126       5310       6173       4853                 
50434303030000100 LERNER BARRY L & AMY AMY LERNER       521,375.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 04 04 00 1     164994       3198       3275       3165                 
50434303030000110 COONEY ROBERT A & COONEY ANNE T       1,577,473.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1975 02 02 00 1     127810       2546       2860       2216                 
50434303030000120 FICALORA ROBERT & FICALORA HELEN       1,609,511.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 04 03 00 2     162721       2592       2777       2205                 
50434303030000131 HEYNIGER SEAN        1,596,508.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 04 03 01 1     199907       3334       3446       3071                 
50434303030000140 CARDINALE ALERIO A CARDINALE ALERIO A TR       1,594,670.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1985 04 03 01 1     199391       3009       3336       2673                 
50434303030000150 ELDIN CHRISTOPHER & JOAN        1,624,317.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1975 04 04 00 1     177404       3096       3294       2868                 
50434303030000160 SIMPSON JAMES S        1,789,399.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 04 04 00 2     625162       3303       3911       2760                 
50434303030000170 REGARD PIERRE G H & MARIE C REGARD MARIE C       462,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 03 01 1     156055       2970       3344       2481                 
50434303030000180 LIGGETT JACK L        436,912.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1985 04 03 00 1     167294       2834       3023       2569                 
50434303030000190 LIDO LLC        1,668,096.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 03 00 1     218094       2537       3128       2068                 
50434303030000200 MIKUS WILLIAM J &        2,047,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 04 03 00 2     598365       4541       4811       4009                 
50434303030000211 JACKSON JOHN T SUZANNE B JACKSON RESIDUARY TRUST       805,887.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 04 03 01 1     292866       4866       5169       4392                 
50434303030000230 OLDHAM ARTHUR II        613,436.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 04 03 01 2     198193       3946       4146       3636                 
50434303030000240 LILJA STEN A LILJA KARIN A       1,181,458.00 0.5643 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1960 04 03 00 2      43116       2533       2821       2159                 
50434303030000240 LILJA STEN A LILJA KARIN A       1,181,458.00 0.5643 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1962 04 04 01 1      83391       4299       5284       3676                 
50434303030000251 PALM BEACH COUNTY PREM DIVISION C/O       0.00 0.02 CTY INC NONMUNI                           
50434303030000252 OCEAN TERRACE BEACH CLUB INC WILLIAM JOHN MIKUS VP C/O       4,822.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434303040000010 SENIOR ROBIN G & ENRIQUE F SENIOR ET AL C/O       11,632,342.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1990 05 06 00 2    1158172       8268       9688       6574                 
50434303040000010 SENIOR ROBIN G & ENRIQUE F SENIOR ET AL C/O       11,632,342.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1990 03 02 00 1     168998       2119       2328       2030                 
50434303040000020 SIMY HOLDINGS INC RICHARD PALADINO C/O       1,585,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 01 1     144089       2785       2925       2825                 
50434303040000030 SIMY HOLDINGS INC RICHARD PALADINO C/O       1,590,086.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1975 03 04 00 1     145107       2709       2839       2452                 
50434303040000040 GRETSCHEL WALTER M & GRETSCHEL MAUREEN L       5,246,630.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    1147783       5678       6263       5019                 
50434303040000050 ELLIOTT WALTER J BARBARA R ELLIOTT RESIDUARY TRUST       453,028.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1975 03 02 00 1     194988       3483       3617       3249                 
50434303040000060 DENNIS MICHAEL T        775,241.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1960 04 03 00 1      38294       2846       3013       2568                 
50434303040000070 NEFF RICHARD B JR        627,918.00 0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1951 04 03 01 1      26401       2760       2929       2520                 
50434303040000080 SWANSON BARBARA J        3,811,324.00 0.3757 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 03 06 00 2    2008846       5058       6746       4329                 
50434303040000090 CKMJ PALM BEACH LLC        8,006,654.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 05 06 01 2    1176462       6386       7446       5728                 
50434303040000100 ZEEMAN JOAN J TRUST ZEEMAN JOAN J  TR       812,905.00 0.551 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1960 02 01 00 1       4503        856        856        856                 
50434303040000100 ZEEMAN JOAN J TRUST ZEEMAN JOAN J  TR       812,905.00 0.551 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1960 04 03 00 1     100441       2915       3299       2750                 
50434303040000110 JACOBI HERBERT H JACOBI HERBERT H TR       1,688,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1985 03 04 01 1     439113       4163       4557       3766                 
50434303040000120 MERCK GEORGE F        3,447,088.00 0.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 00 05 01 2    1274839       5764       6704       5283                 
50434303050000010 MCINTOSH TRUST ATTN: MICHAEL TANNENBAUM       6,983,932.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 06 00 1    1531899       6152       6504       5646                 
50434303050000011 VAN DER GRIFT PAUL J & JOAN R VAN DER JOAN R       3,379,502.00 1.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1998 05 07 01 2    3938456      13950      18440      12257                 
50434303050000030 DEFLIN ASHLEY M        712,242.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1985 05 03 00 1     243137       3898       4311       3668                 
50434303050000040 VAN HOEK BRADLEY        2,315,344.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 2000 00 05 01 2     743046       5071       5860       4404                 
50434303050000050 WILLIAMS WILLIAM S & WILLIAMS RITA J       1,154,088.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2005 06 05 01      771925       5658       6264       5130                 
50434303050000060 WOOLEMS JAMES M & WOOLEMS ELEANOR R       2,378,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 06 01 2    1670215       5457       6439       4842                 
50434303050000070 CONNAUGHTON RICHARD & CONNAUGHTON DRAGANA       2,894,331.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    1370930       7053       7603       6501                 
50434303050000080 DIBACCO THOMAS V & MALLIE Z MALLIE ZIDENAH DIBACCO       641,407.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1975 04 03 01 1     216642       3831       4022       3460                 
50434303060000011 MESSING ELSA S TRUST MESSING ELSA S TRUSTEE       6,384,476.00 0.75 SINGLE FAMILY 1944 1965 03 02 00 2       7787       1940       2219       1652                 
50434303060000011 MESSING ELSA S TRUST MESSING ELSA S TRUSTEE       6,384,476.00 0.75 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1975 00 01 00 1       3900        785       1381          1                 
50434303060000012 HIRSCH CARL E        2,923,363.00 0.75 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 05 04 01 2     957620       5312       5956       4757                 
50434303060000012 HIRSCH CARL E        2,923,363.00 0.75 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 02 00 1     191953       2089       2451       1425                 
50434303060000030 RUNCO KRISTINE N        2,022,095.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 04 05 01 2    1011382       5521       6023       5019                 
50434303060000040 DAVIS HUGH C III DAVIS DEANNA S       2,280,852.00 0.5969 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 04 05 00 2    1115603       4919       5291       4511                 
50434303060000060 CONESE EUGENE P JR &        2,080,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1980 04 03 00 1     257940       2802       3103       2553                 
50434303060000070 CAYLOR THOMAS O & CAYLOR ZORINA       1,853,887.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1986 04 03 01 1     547178       3417       3732       2927                 
50434303060000080 SCHROEDER MARK & SCHROEDER NANCY J       1,871,761.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1980 04 03 01 1      60378       2901       3195       2820                 
50434303060000090 KIERNAN ROBERT E III & KIERNAN MARY L       3,289,238.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    1463178       4988       6023       4192                 
50434303060000100 WOODS LOTI C        2,541,408.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 05 02 2    1578156       5868       6865       5207                 
50434303060000111 DIXON DORA D        1,409,471.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1957 04 03 00 1       7712       2515       2687       2190                 
50434303060000112 CUILLO ROBERT S        3,755,058.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 04 04 01 1    1011799       6071       6389       5627                 
50434303060000130 PINCOURT A KENNETH JR & PINCOURT DALE A       1,867,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1985 05 05 01 1     114195       5028       5477       4469                 
50434303060000140 BARBATO GENE R & GENE BARBATO TR TITL HLDR       1,425,701.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 04 03 00 1      10910       2979       3161       2594                 
50434303060000150 SHAW ARLEDGE GISELE N        7,121,944.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 2001 05 04 01 2    1565687       5879       6762       5283                 
50434303060000160 ADAMS KATHY & ADAMS ERIC       452,710.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1975 04 03 00 1      91872       3042       3375       2591                 
50434303060000170 WHEELER DENNIS J        2,042,783.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 04 03 01 1     237525       2769       3152       2198                 
50434303060000180 KINDRED JOHN M & LORAINE V KINDRED LORAINE V       429,335.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1970 04 03 00 1     122443       2346       2426       2402                 
50434303060000190 COHLAN JOHN L & COHLAN LOUISA R       3,300,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 02 01 00 2    1393451       7298       8892       6217                 
50434303060000210 RODDY ROBERT A        755,681.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1946 02 01 00 1       1344        254        254        254                 
50434303060000210 RODDY ROBERT A        755,681.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 04 03 00 1.5      17056       2867       3144       2760                 
50434303060000220 DIMM WAYNE F & DIMM MARGARET B       525,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 03 01 1     216589       3430       3674       2979                 
50434303060000230 PALM BEACH VENTURES II LLC        2,920,497.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 04 05 02     1066782       5452       5953       5011                 
50434303060000240 COHLAN JOHN L & COHLAN LOUISE R       375,005.00 0.1688 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434303060000251 POHLMANN HERBERT C JR        3,990,011.00 0.51 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1992 05 04 01 1     870677       5443       6416       4620                 
50434303060000270 KRON ISABELLA & MASON MARK       1,853,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1968 03 03 00 1     203569       2352       2442       2142                 
50434303060000280 STEWART ANDREW & CATHERINE M CATHERINE M STEWART       773,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 02 01 00 1      59462       1004       1060        920                 
50434303060000280 STEWART ANDREW & CATHERINE M CATHERINE M STEWART       773,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 04 03 01 2     282900       3140       3162       3130                 
50434303060000290 HAFT STUART J &        1,349,806.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1960 03 02 00 2      44773        891        916        880                 
50434303060000290 HAFT STUART J &        1,349,806.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1985 03 03 01 2      25254       3111       3371       2590                 
50434303060000300 GENATT ARLENE        2,063,988.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1990 04 03 00 1     467545       3279       3953       2808                 
50434303060000310 JPBK PROPERTIES II COE & BROBERG C/O       1,973,610.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 04 04 01 1     165800       3235       3408       2832                 
50434303060000320 FRAZIER ANDREW S & FRAZIER NANCY T       1,924,239.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 03 00 1     111529       2338       2512       2040                 
50434303060000330 ZWICKY JEAN K        412,702.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 02 00 1     108198       2184       2379       2134                 
50434303060000340 RICARDEL ANDREA E        390,419.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1970 04 03 00 1     172495       3240       3730       2839                 
50434303070000010 NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF FL TR M FLANAGAN C/O       1,626,756.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 04 03 00 1     177674       3041       3169       2778                 
50434303070000020 LOGAN LAVINIA B DURKIN ROBERT TR       961,241.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 03 00 1     139936       2537       2725       2199                 
50434303070000030 WEHMAN RICHARD H 2004 TRUST WEHMAN RICHARD H TR       1,605,801.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 04 03 00 1     160193       2660       2688       2688                 
50434303070000050 SNYDER SHERIDAN        3,032,991.00 0.3896 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 03 00 1     214738       3835       4160       3279                 
50434303080000010 SMITH BERNADETTE C        8,373,966.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1937 05 06 01 3      29115       8778      10043       7373                 
50434303080000030 SANDERS DONALD E SANDERS VALERIE J       933,654.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1995 05 04 00 1     533946       3884       4315       3472                 
50434303080000040 NAVY BLUE OVERSEAS INC        1,618,959.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1990 04 03 00 1     167931       2825       3062       2484                 
50434303080000091 LEVINE BARBARA S        792,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 04 03 00 1     448935       3973       4449       3466                 
50434303080000092 WARFIELD ROBERT        1,601,250.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 05 03 01 1     147216       2883       3166       2762                 
50434303080000110 DE TOMASO ISABELLE H        1,561,761.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 03 01 1     166289       3164       3470       2550                 
50434303080000120 PEARL FRANK H PEARL GERYL T       6,756,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1990 04 03 00 2     476543       3342       3647       3267                 
50434303080000120 PEARL FRANK H PEARL GERYL T       6,756,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1976 02 01 00 1      30764        385        647          1                 
50434303080000130 BAKER KANE K        2,265,920.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 05 04 00 2    1672534       5500       6856       4649                 
50434303080000140 KASSEWITZ DARCIE &        6,102,866.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 05 05 01 2     172476       5916       6579       5315                 
50434303080000160 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1991 1991 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      46980        800         
50434303080000240 COLLIER TERRY K & MARIA M COLLIER MARIA M       542,997.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 04 04 01 2     208680       4452       5012       3712                 
50434303080000250 PALTROW ROBERT B ASPETONG PARTNERS LP       5,400,242.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 05 05 01 3     992424       5521       5690       5242                 
50434303090000011 SWINGLE MARION BOULTON STROUD        6,140,477.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 05 05 00 2     356936       4576       5645       3090                 
50434303090000011 SWINGLE MARION BOULTON STROUD        6,140,477.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 05 05 00 2     356936       4576       5645       3090                 
50434303090000020 MERCK GEORGE F & MERCK ADELE S       11,330,295.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 03 2    5552595      10991      14310       9878                 
50434303090000020 MERCK GEORGE F & MERCK ADELE S       11,330,295.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 03 2    5552595      10991      14310       9878                 
50434303090000031 FISK AVERELL H SLOVIN BRUCE TR       3,451,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1965 05 05 01 2      51050       4690       5850       3622                 
50434303090000031 FISK AVERELL H SLOVIN BRUCE TR       3,451,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1965 05 05 01 2      51050       4690       5850       3622                 
50434303090000041 KAUPE SANDRA T        3,927,301.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1965 05 05 01 2     387927       4851       5800       4444                 
50434303090000041 KAUPE SANDRA T        3,927,301.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1965 05 05 01 2     387927       4851       5800       4444                 
50434303090000090 RHODES PAUL & RHODES SUSAN       1,567,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1995 05 05 01 1     552871       3594       3967       3145                 
50434303090000090 RHODES PAUL & RHODES SUSAN       1,567,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1995 05 05 01 1     552871       3594       3967       3145                 
50434303090000100 ANDREWS MICHAEL F & LORRAINE ANDREWS LORRAINE       574,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 02 00 1     324654       2455       2810       2061                 
50434303090000100 ANDREWS MICHAEL F & LORRAINE ANDREWS LORRAINE       574,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 02 00 1     324654       2455       2810       2061                 
50434303090000110 GEORGE LYNN W        458,191.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 04 03 00 1       7026       2810       3069       2092                 
50434303090000110 GEORGE LYNN W        458,191.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 04 03 00 1       7026       2810       3069       2092                 
50434303090000120 JOHNSON SCOTT A & KRISTINE S KRISTINE S JOHNSON       547,819.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1985 04 03 01 1     225849       4389       4628       3984                 
50434303090000120 JOHNSON SCOTT A & KRISTINE S KRISTINE S JOHNSON       547,819.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1985 04 03 01 1     225849       4389       4628       3984                 
50434303090000130 SULLIVAN MARCIA G        3,572,657.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 04 05 00 2    2161559       5277       5884       4740                 
50434303090000130 SULLIVAN MARCIA G        3,572,657.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 04 05 00 2    2161559       5277       5884       4740                 
50434303090000140 THOMPSON ANNE K        2,069,858.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 00 1     820256       4234       4385       3881                 
50434303090000140 THOMPSON ANNE K        2,069,858.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 00 1     820256       4234       4385       3881                 
50434303090000150 VERBOCKEL JOHN P & CARBONARA KATHLEEN C       2,073,727.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 00 1     629567       2826       3208       2154                 
50434303090000150 VERBOCKEL JOHN P & CARBONARA KATHLEEN C       2,073,727.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 00 1     629567       2826       3208       2154                 
50434303090000160 DE GUARDIOLA EDWARD        2,413,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 05 06 00      933931       4803       5213       4352                 
50434303090000160 DE GUARDIOLA EDWARD        2,413,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 05 06 00      933931       4803       5213       4352                 
50434303090000171 KUHLMAN ALICE N KUHLMAN ALICE NORDHAUSEN TR       400,120.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 00 1     122813       2362       2892       1691                 
50434303090000171 KUHLMAN ALICE N KUHLMAN ALICE NORDHAUSEN TR       400,120.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 00 1     122813       2362       2892       1691                 
50434303090000180 KIERNAN CHARLES E TRUST &        2,563,742.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 03 01 1    1086769       4223       4698       3785                 
50434303090000180 KIERNAN CHARLES E TRUST &        2,563,742.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 03 01 1    1086769       4223       4698       3785                 
50434303090000191 LORENZ JEFFREY J        5,355,797.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1964 03 04 00 1      68468       3523       3632       3258                 
50434303090000191 LORENZ JEFFREY J        5,355,797.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1966 02 01 00 1      20648        907       1404        364                 
50434303090000191 LORENZ JEFFREY J        5,355,797.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1964 03 04 00 1      68468       3523       3632       3258                 
50434303090000191 LORENZ JEFFREY J        5,355,797.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1966 02 01 00 1      20648        907       1404        364                 
50434303090000201 FARRY NANCY M & DONALD E FARRY H/W       552,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 04 03 00 1     169560       3187       3322       2931                 
50434303090000201 FARRY NANCY M & DONALD E FARRY H/W       552,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 04 03 00 1     169560       3187       3322       2931                 
50434303090000202 FRANKS JOHN E & JOHN E FRANKS TRUST       1,647,765.00 0.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 1     443164       5319       5910       3612                 
50434303090000202 FRANKS JOHN E & JOHN E FRANKS TRUST       1,647,765.00 0.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 1     443164       5319       5910       3612                 
50434303090000203 SWINGLE MARION BOULTON STROUD        47,749.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303090000203 SWINGLE MARION BOULTON STROUD        47,749.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303090000220 LOGSDON JOHN & SUSAN THOMAS H/W       420,536.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 04 03 00 1     124413       2541       2845       1833                 
50434303090000220 LOGSDON JOHN & SUSAN THOMAS H/W       420,536.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 04 03 00 1     124413       2541       2845       1833                 
50434303090000230 ELHILOW VINCE A        1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303090000230 ELHILOW VINCE A        1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303090000240 MCCLUSKEY MALCOLM M & MCCLUSKEY ANGELA       2,527,430.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 03 01 1    1181854       4802       4954       4474                 
50434303090000240 MCCLUSKEY MALCOLM M & MCCLUSKEY ANGELA       2,527,430.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 03 01 1    1181854       4802       4954       4474                 
50434303090000250 HAFT JAY &        2,085,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 05 03 00 1     607654       3775       4275       3375                 
50434303090000250 HAFT JAY &        2,085,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 05 03 00 1     607654       3775       4275       3375                 
50434303090000260 MCKENNA DONALD & MCKENNA SARA T       860,610.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 01 1       6273       2702       2897       2420                 
50434303090000260 MCKENNA DONALD & MCKENNA SARA T       860,610.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 01 1       6273       2702       2897       2420                 
50434303090000270 BLANCHARD MAUREEN        835,727.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 00 1      79827       3081       3409       2529                 
50434303090000270 BLANCHARD MAUREEN        835,727.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 00 1      79827       3081       3409       2529                 
50434303090000280 SAM SOR DEV INC SORBARA GROUP C/O       1,447,687.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 03 03 00 1       7309       2356       2688       2306                 
50434303090000280 SAM SOR DEV INC SORBARA GROUP C/O       1,447,687.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 03 03 00 1       7309       2356       2688       2306                 
50434303090000290 CARTON EDWIN D        1,166,635.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 03 03 00 1     332787       3207       3775       2678                 
50434303090000290 CARTON EDWIN D        1,166,635.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 03 03 00 1     332787       3207       3775       2678                 
50434303090000300 MATWICZYK PETER MATWICZYK PETER TR       813,524.00 0.33 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 04 03 01 1      22868       3167       3266       2936                 
50434303090000300 MATWICZYK PETER MATWICZYK PETER TR       813,524.00 0.33 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 04 03 01 1      22868       3167       3266       2936                 
50434303090000310 COLE PEYTON MAGRUDER COLE BETH A       815,728.00 0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1985 04 05 01 2     320984       4210       5191       3754                 
50434303090000310 COLE PEYTON MAGRUDER COLE BETH A       815,728.00 0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1985 04 05 01 2     320984       4210       5191       3754                 
50434303090000320 JAFFE RONALD G & JAFFE MARLENE I       1,264,426.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 00 1       6119       2245       2508       2132                 
50434303090000320 JAFFE RONALD G & JAFFE MARLENE I       1,264,426.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 00 1       6119       2245       2508       2132                 
50434303090000330 SCIALABBA DAVID & SCIALABBA SALLY       1,624,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 04 03 00 1     168014       2703       3172       2446                 
50434303090000330 SCIALABBA DAVID & SCIALABBA SALLY       1,624,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 04 03 00 1     168014       2703       3172       2446                 
50434303090000340 HOCHSTIN ROGER J & JUDITH JUDITH R HOCHSTIN       680,059.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 05 03 01 1     218147       3736       3959       3376                 
50434303090000340 HOCHSTIN ROGER J & JUDITH JUDITH R HOCHSTIN       680,059.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 05 03 01 1     218147       3736       3959       3376                 
50434303090000350 CARNES THERESA F & FERGUSON THOMAS C       1,594,689.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1970 04 03 00 2     151577       2887       3203       2559                 
50434303090000350 CARNES THERESA F & FERGUSON THOMAS C       1,594,689.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1970 04 03 00 2     151577       2887       3203       2559                 
50434303090000360 231 NIGHTINGALE TRAIL LLC        3,051,107.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 04 03 00 1      35939       2880       3322       2464                 
50434303090000360 231 NIGHTINGALE TRAIL LLC        3,051,107.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1958 02 01 00 1       9041        760        799        743                 
50434303090000360 231 NIGHTINGALE TRAIL LLC        3,051,107.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 04 03 00 1      35939       2880       3322       2464                 
50434303090000360 231 NIGHTINGALE TRAIL LLC        3,051,107.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1958 02 01 00 1       9041        760        799        743                 
50434303090000380 DUEMLER ROBERT L & DUEMLER CATHERINE M       1,748,020.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1990 05 05 00 1.5     342452       4181       4366       3838                 
50434303090000380 DUEMLER ROBERT L & DUEMLER CATHERINE M       1,748,020.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1990 05 05 00 1.5     342452       4181       4366       3838                 
50434303090000390 MEYER WILLIAM B JR & ELIZA S MEYER ELIZA S       889,493.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1985 05 04 00 1     731372       4793       5012       4440                 
50434303090000390 MEYER WILLIAM B JR & ELIZA S MEYER ELIZA S       889,493.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1985 05 04 00 1     731372       4793       5012       4440                 
50434303090000400 KHOURY DAVID N & KHOURY AUBREY       1,444,831.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 02 00 1       4831       1467       1727       1122                 
50434303090000400 KHOURY DAVID N & KHOURY AUBREY       1,444,831.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 02 00 1       4831       1467       1727       1122                 
50434303090000410 DAVIDSON MARVIN H        7,532,375.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 07 00 2    2255826       7975       8978       6787                 
50434303090000410 DAVIDSON MARVIN H        7,532,375.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 07 00 2    2255826       7975       8978       6787                 
50434303090000411 DAVIDSON MARVIN H        55,292.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303090000411 DAVIDSON MARVIN H        55,292.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303090000421 COLE JEFFREY A TRUST        6,473,242.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1990 05 06 00 1    1101820       6748       7219       6299                 
50434303090000421 COLE JEFFREY A TRUST        6,473,242.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1979 02 01 01 1      45829        500        500        500                 
50434303090000421 COLE JEFFREY A TRUST        6,473,242.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1990 05 06 00 1    1101820       6748       7219       6299                 
50434303090000421 COLE JEFFREY A TRUST        6,473,242.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1979 02 01 01 1      45829        500        500        500                 
50434303090000422 MOCKING BIRD TRUST ATTN: MICHAEL TANNENBAUM       1,581,919.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 03 00 2     141572       2758       2766       2754                 
50434303090000422 MOCKING BIRD TRUST ATTN: MICHAEL TANNENBAUM       1,581,919.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 03 00 2     141572       2758       2766       2754                 
50434303090000440 RAMPELL ELLEN        750,139.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1985 03 03 01 2     289517       4820       5518       4191                 
50434303090000440 RAMPELL ELLEN        750,139.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1985 03 03 01 2     289517       4820       5518       4191                 
50434303090000450 TURK JO M        358,902.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1952 04 02 00 1      26937       2600       2855       2444                 
50434303090000450 TURK JO M        358,902.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1952 04 02 00 1      26937       2600       2855       2444                 
50434303090000460 WILDRICK ROBERT N        2,418,918.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 2    1426565       5626       7029       5039                 
50434303090000460 WILDRICK ROBERT N        2,418,918.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 2    1426565       5626       7029       5039                 
50434303090000471 SEWELL FRANCES        463,530.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 03 00 1     159249       2710       2889       2291                 
50434303090000471 SEWELL FRANCES        463,530.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 03 00 1     159249       2710       2889       2291                 
50434303090000480 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A & HOPKINS TAFFY A       462,664.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 03 04 01 1     143517       2664       2928       2283                 
50434303090000480 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A & HOPKINS TAFFY A       462,664.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 03 04 01 1     143517       2664       2928       2283                 
50434303090000490 MAXEY JACK F & MAXEY TALBOTT B       1,259,793.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 04 01 2      56811       4189       4673       3644                 
50434303090000490 MAXEY JACK F & MAXEY TALBOTT B       1,259,793.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 04 01 2      56811       4189       4673       3644                 
50434303090000500 SMITH ROBIN A & LORE DRYZGULA-SMITH H/W       415,740.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 04 03 00 1      89314       2400       2478       2218                 
50434303090000500 SMITH ROBIN A & LORE DRYZGULA-SMITH H/W       415,740.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 04 03 00 1      89314       2400       2478       2218                 
50434303090000510 CANEPARI DAVID J & CANEPARI DIANE E       858,930.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1941 1990 04 03 00 1     188999       3080       3181       2893                 
50434303090000510 CANEPARI DAVID J & CANEPARI DIANE E       858,930.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1941 1990 04 03 00 1     188999       3080       3181       2893                 
50434303090000520 PALM BEACH VENTURES III LLC        2,160,000.00 0.4 VACANT                           
50434303090000520 PALM BEACH VENTURES III LLC        2,160,000.00 0.4 VACANT                           
50434303100000010 JENSEN FRANK TR ATTN:  MICHAEL TANNENBAUM       1,440,000.00 0.33 VACANT                           
50434303100000030 JENSEN FRANK TR ATTN: MICHAEL TANNENBAUM       5,355,609.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1965 05 06 00 2     456006       5372       6785       4081                 
50434303100000050 BROWN WILLIAM C III        1,275,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1960 03 02 00 1       4848       1437       1463       1375                 
50434303100000060 MOLONEY THOMAS W & JAN M SALSGIVER H/W       2,559,484.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1963 02 01 00 1       9756        121        201          1                 
50434303100000060 MOLONEY THOMAS W & JAN M SALSGIVER H/W       2,559,484.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1970 05 04 00 1.5      71374       3674       4297       3232                 
50434303100000080 POKLEPOVIC JERRY & MICHEL S        1,546,212.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 02 00 1     106212       2145       2340       1583                 
50434303100000091 MADDOCK PAUL L JR & CYTHLEN C MADDOCK CYTHLEN C       2,302,996.00 0.89 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 07 00 1     996351       7332       7968       6092                 
50434303100000110 WORLEY SCOTT D & CHRISTINA L WORLEY CHRISTINA L       407,126.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1990 03 02 00 1       8960       2593       2692       2362                 
50434303110000270 HARPEL JAMES W        7,889,378.00 1.3322 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1980 05 05 01 2     810873       9751      12550       8630                 
50434303110000270 HARPEL JAMES W        7,889,378.00 1.3322 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 01 00 1     131877       1853       1932       1734                 
50434303110000281 FRASER RONALD G & FRASER PATRICIA D H/W       321,578.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 02 00 1       8073       2489       2614       2455                 
50434303110000282 LEE SUSAN C TR        1,373,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 04 03 00 1       8240       2331       2477       2268                 
50434303110000291 ROBERTSON ALLAN D & ROBERTSON BRUCE W &       1,357,426.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 03 03 00 2       7074       2147       2599       1722                 
50434303110000301 KEELER RICHARD I & KEELER DEBRA C       709,857.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1985 03 02 00 1       7197       2219       2500       1829                 
50434303110000310 MADDOCK JEFFREY P MADDOCK JUDITH C TR       838,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 03 02 00 1       5008       1545       1782       1247                 
50434303110000321 LITTLE GARY C        435,648.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1985 03 02 00 1       7743       2124       2227       1882                 
50434303110000330 QUEENS LANE LLC        1,400,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303110000340 CRUZ LICINIO & CRUZ DORIS       1,957,918.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     530872       3981       4372       3813                 
50434303110000350 GOLDSMITH CHRISTINA D        1,154,870.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1985 04 03 01 1      12072       3447       3922       2810                 
50434303110000361 MOORE VICTOR &        2,296,645.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1990 04 04 00 1     540285       3554       3949       3145                 
50434303110000381 WAFFENSCHMIDT FRIEDRICH & WAFFENSCHMIDT ANNA       8,773,678.00 0.58 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1985 05 04 01 2     847965       5017       5461       4043                 
50434303110000382 BUTLER PAULA S        9,669,596.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 2000 05 05 01 2    1926312       6918       7523       6344                 
50434303110000391 STANTON DANIEL W & STANTON MARY B       12,236,797.00 0.6 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 2001 00 07 01 2    5489849       8720       9932       7864                 
50434303110000401 CONNAUGHTON DRAGANA N        1,414,896.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1970 03 03 00 1       9926       2357       2973       1836                 
50434303110000411 LEAS SUSAN M        739,612.00 0.2526 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 04 03 00 1      50604       3155       3353       2393                 
50434303110000421 KOURNIKOVA ALLA        1,617,253.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 05 04 00 1     166283       3564       3736       3275                 
50434303110000422 PEARL I & PEARL HELEN       970,121.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303110000441 CONROY FRANCIS P & CONROY JANICE B       565,866.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1975 03 02 00 1       5880       1711       1844       1466                 
50434303110000442 APPLE STEVEN        1,414,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 04 03 00 1       9827       2201       2375       2002                 
50434303110000462 SULLIVAN CHARLES SULLIVAN ELIZABETH       1,415,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 04 02 00 1       9302       2260       2523       2209                 
50434303110000471 REYNCO INC        1,374,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1985 04 03 00 1       7205       2186       2290       1984                 
50434303110000472 PHILLIPS BARBARA A TRUST & PHILLIPS WARREN H TRUST       1,363,742.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1965 03 02 00 1       7123       1498       1498       1498                 
50434303110000482 IMPASTATO SALVATORE J TR        1,362,490.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1975 03 02 00 1       5348       1618       1803       1436                 
50434303110000492 SCHAUER TIFFANY M        1,371,582.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1988 03 02 00 1       5944       1653       1741       1615                 
50434303110000502 ADLER ANDREW N        1,350,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303110000503 HOLMAN B WILLIAM &        3,093,106.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 05 01 2    1509170       5664       5947       5238                 
50434303120000011 COLONIAL MONTEREY BCH CLUB INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434303120000013 QUEEN LANE CULTURAL        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434303120000014 KOHL SIDNEY        51,077.00 0.03 VACANT                           
50434303120000031 177 QUEENS LANE LLC        1,475,132.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 05 04 01 2      74052       5061       5495       3770                 
50434303120000090 SHERMAN JOAN TR        800,770.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1995 05 04 01 2     453876       3122       3289       2798                 
50434303120000130 CAMERON HAYES J & MICHELE MICHELE CAMERON-HAYES       522,890.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 03 01 2     389719       3460       3568       3309                 
50434303120000170 WHITFIELD GRAHAM F        343,063.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 04 03 00 2     265028       2719       3078       2480                 
50434303120000210 MACARI STEPHEN J        1,822,203.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     457135       3418       3537       3393                 
50434303120000250 DOLANSKI ANTHONY P & DOLANSKI ADELE M       1,734,818.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1985 04 03 01 2     371025       3513       3878       3228                 
50434303120000290 WRIGHTSMAN STEPHANIE        1,171,411.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1985 04 03 01 2     534225       3207       3436       2847                 
50434303120000340 VANCE JAMES E & VANCE DOLORES M       732,020.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1985 05 04 00 2     377942       3547       4152       3086                 
50434303120000390 COONEY MICHAEL & CATHY H        1,405,004.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303120000440 COONEY MICHAEL & CATHY H COONEY CATHY H       632,351.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 05 04 01 2     502116       4796       5262       4413                 
50434303120000490 CRITOPH BECK P & CRITOPH A G       1,186,163.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 05 03 01 2      87491       3796       3897       3601                 
50434303120000540 1141 NORTH LAKE WAY INC        9,152,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303120000550 BURKE VIRGINIA S        1,982,270.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 04 03 00 1      70980       4056       4374       3490                 
50434303120000550 BURKE VIRGINIA S        1,982,270.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1980 02 01 01 1      65957        815        987        415                 
50434303120000560 ATTERBURY WILLIAM W III        523,675.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 03 01 2     453524       4084       4410       3671                 
50434303120000610 ROSENBERG STEVEN P        749,750.00 0.32 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1980 04 03 00 2     586937       5467       5734       4932                 
50434303120000681 STAMBAUGH R J & CAROLYN STAMBAUGH CAROLYN       656,911.00 0.32 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1965 05 04 01 2     405193       4222       4692       3549                 
50434303120000760 QUEENS LANE LLC        1,676,434.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 04 03 00 2     275994       2814       3460       2140                 
50434303120000810 MARINO VERA G        1,362,392.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1975 04 03 00 1       7673       2365       2394       2335                 
50434303120000841 ROBERTSON ALLAN D & ALEXANDER ANNETTE J       6,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303120000850 SECK JOSEPH G & MARILYN V SECK MARILYN V       510,380.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1985 04 02 01 2     353425       3130       3705       2834                 
50434303120000890 CANEPA ADAM & CANEPA KARIN K       1,122,270.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1975 04 04 00 1       7287       2245       2438       1877                 
50434303120000930 STOLTZ RUTH E        384,210.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 04 03 00 2       8716       2644       2896       2382                 
50434303120000971 WELLMEIER FRAZIER & WELLMEIER SUSAN O       1,043,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 02 01 2     514619       2974       3098       2822                 
50434303120001010 CHOPIN L FRANK TRUSTEE L FRANK CHOPIN PLC C/O       2,541,281.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1996 00 04 00 2    1125046       4178       4462       3847                 
50434303130000010 KASUN DONALD L        2,224,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 06 01 1    1346298       4915       5559       4449                 
50434303130000020 BORMAN GINA M        3,728,542.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 04 05 01 2    1916814       6893       7279       6570                 
50434303130000031 JAMISON HENRY D IV &        1,201,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1985 05 03 01 2     553870       4741       5214       4280                 
50434303130000051 BROBERG PETER S & BROBERG BEVERLY D       716,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1948 02 01 00 1       1602        528        601        496                 
50434303130000051 BROBERG PETER S & BROBERG BEVERLY D       716,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1985 04 03 00 2     559221       4003       4411       3680                 
50434303130000061 MONTGOMERY S PHELPS        412,760.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 04 03 01 2     270275       2894       3142       2668                 
50434303130000062 MANN MYRA D        377,377.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1965 03 02 00 1       5762       1851       1960       1596                 
50434303130000062 MANN MYRA D        377,377.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 02 01 00 1       1357        328        374        308                 
50434303130000090 HURTADO RICARDO M        875,116.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1995 05 04 00 2    1022005       4251       4761       4032                 
50434303130000101 MAASS ROBB R MAASS ELIZABETH T       575,313.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 05 03 01 2     393592       3665       3843       3351                 
50434303130000102 SCHILLER KATHY A        319,866.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1985 03 01 00 1       4433       1323       1526       1222                 
50434303130000110 MIRANDA DENYSE D MIRANDA DENYSE D TR       527,495.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1950 02 01 00 1      24058        442        474        420                 
50434303130000110 MIRANDA DENYSE D MIRANDA DENYSE D TR       527,495.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 04 03 01 2     280038       3266       3583       2835                 
50434303130000121 MURRAY J T & NANCY M MURRAY NANCY M       820,257.00 0.49 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1975 05 05 01 2     380582       3521       3822       3179                 
50434303130000131 LEMOLE GERALD M &        2,954,253.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1997 05 04 00 2     788388       4841       5017       4489                 
50434303130000171 WICK WALTER D &        2,795,491.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1990 04 03 01 2    1190784       3663       4039       3219                 
50434303130000181 SNOW RAYMOND W & CHRISTINE F SNOW CHRISTINE F       471,867.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 04 04 00 1     136872       2780       2856       2786                 
50434303130000201 CUMMINGS JANE L        950,666.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 05 03 00 2     519718       3794       3919       3701                 
50434303130000210 HALLAC ALBERT &        1,532,479.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 03 00 1      85161       3247       3406       2877                 
50434303130000231 DUNSTON LEIGH E & PAMELA T DUNSTON PAMELA T       637,462.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1980 04 03 01 2     398313       3937       4478       3448                 
50434303130000241 PEARL I & PEARL HELEN       452,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 04 03 00 2     267088       2974       3783       2316                 
50434303130000251 LUCIER JOAN        514,996.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1975 02 02 00 1     110430       2067       2178       1869                 
50434303130000262 DEMARCO FRANKLYN P        1,760,556.00 0.326 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 03 00 1     134860       2335       2617       1925                 
50434303130000290 DE MARCO FRANKLYN P JR        5,711,119.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 05 11 01 2    3128659       8611       9394       7616                 
50434303140000010 LEONARD JOHN & LEONARD LAURIE L       2,144,266.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 04 07 00 2    1225073       4836       5604       4322                 
50434303140000021 BOOTH JOAN G        671,762.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1965 05 03 00 2     205962       3856       4368       3298                 
50434303140000041 HOLBROOK CHRISTOPHER & ALICE        1,863,177.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 2000 04 03 01 2     418738       2914       3216       2248                 
50434303140000051 PALMERIO IMOGENE D        265,175.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 02 02 00 1      88927       1916       1970       1835                 
50434303140000061 LARSON DAVID &        953,051.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1980 05 04 00 2     229723       4252       4697       3752                 
50434303140000080 SEASIDE PARTNERS LLC        1,561,731.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 03 03 00 1      96311       1921       2261       1597                 
50434303140000091 OBRIEN RAYMOND C &        974,986.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 02 00 1     116011       2207       2443       1982                 
50434303140000101 251 ORANGE GROVE LLC TRICONY MANAGEMENT LLC C/O       1,542,730.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 02 00 1     101854       2102       2255       1837                 
50434303140000111 DE LA BEGASSIERE DIANE        1,408,713.00 0.2108 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1975 03 03 00 1       8441       2601       2819       2456                 
50434303140000121 FINCH STEVEN G & FINCH APRIL G       2,429,539.00 0.4583 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 05 03 01 2     461092       3957       4195       3602                 
50434303140000150 ROSE C TANNER JR & ROSE ROSS C       958,996.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1944 1985 04 03 01 2     194245       2910       3233       2759                 
50434303140000160 JOYCE JOHN R &        2,028,095.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1990 04 03 01 2     581447       3921       4377       3425                 
50434303140000201 BONER NEIL        679,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 03 04 00 1     361626       4207       4432       3817                 
50434303140000220 LAVAN SPENCER & LAVAN SUSAN       856,758.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 04 03 00 2     153780       2927       3180       2864                 
50434303140000230 ANGLE CHRISTIAN J & ANGLE ANN-BRITT       340,015.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 03 01 1     129003       2550       2756       2436                 
50434303140000240 HENCH MICHAEL A HENCH SHARON B       630,118.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 04 03 01 2     141387       2656       2775       2479                 
50434303140000250 BENJAMIN DALE H        674,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 03 02 00 1      88280       1713       1810       1672                 
50434303140000260 PETER HALMOS & SONS INC        1,609,327.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1941 1985 04 03 00 2     148848       2773       2995       2565                 
50434303140000271 TOMLINSON ALLEN & TOMLINSON PEGGY       313,530.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 03 03 00 1      89973       1927       2460       1672                 
50434303140000281 MATTHEWS ELMER M & MATTHEWS MARJORIE A       1,511,000.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 03 02 00 1      60249       1970       2184       1604                 
50434303140000291 CERAVOLO J J & DOROTHY CERAVOLO DOROTHY       425,600.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 04 03 00 1     145026       2760       2978       2659                 
50434303140000301 MARTIN CAROLE L        813,499.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1980 04 03 01 2     151446       2589       3120       2076                 
50434303140000320 LEONHARDT WALTER W & ROSE M LEONHARDT ROSE M       411,881.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 04 03 01 2     175430       3220       3644       2620                 
50434303140000331 LANGDON AY T        908,414.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 2000 04 03 01 2     820399       4191       5418       3414                 
50434303140000341 ABOUZEID GEORGE A & ABOUZEID DIANA L       3,336,611.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    2106328       6395       7508       5776                 
50434303140000350 SCHULHOF MICHAEL P & SCHULHOF PAOLA N       16,726,169.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 06 08 02 1    5301010      11002      12060      10232                 
50434303140000360 RADTKE JANINA TRUST        11,413,726.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 05 03 01 1      20056       4139       4489       3400                 
50434303150000030 SCHUR MARVIN H SCHUR EDITH A       5,654,314.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 07 00 2    1919243       8199      10121       7585                 
50434303150000040 FORMAN SAM FORMAN SAM TR       5,981,297.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 2002 00 06 00 2    2337879       8187       9807       7165                 
50434303160000010 BEESON JOHN S        3,342,706.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 04 00 2    1561181       3998       4305       3626                 
50434303160000020 SHINIZKY AMI & JOLLY BARBARA J       1,948,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1978 04 03 00 1     172805       3039       3238       2618                 
50434303160000030 GUARI JASON J & GUARI NICOLE M       1,920,744.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1975 04 02 00 1     149508       2804       3118       2212                 
50434303160000040 MOSKOWITZ BRUCE W & MARSHA MOSKOWITZ MARSHA       707,186.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1990 05 03 01 2     677532       3757       4218       3247                 
50434303160000050 LYLE PROPERTIES LLC        2,233,994.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1985 04 06 00 2     458782       4555       4810       4171                 
50434303160000060 HOUSE NADINE C        1,367,309.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1980 04 03 01 1      14778       3188       3350       2843                 
50434303160000070 MOFFETT GEORGE M II & LUCIE P MOFFETT LUCIE P       516,525.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 04 03 00 1     240231       3161       3529       2611                 
50434303160000080 GIGLIOTTI JOHN C &        2,111,874.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1995 04 03 00 1     328552       3139       3398       2752                 
50434303160000090 TORRES REALTY INVESTMENTS LLC        1,783,669.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1960 04 04 00 1      14044       3030       3488       2433                 
50434303160000100 DEMARINIS VICTOR        810,953.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 03 01 1     330765       2859       3010       2543                 
50434303160000110 SLINGLUFF GAIL G SLINGLUFF CHARLES H III TR       1,626,539.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 03 01 2     253537       3051       3286       2622                 
50434303160000120 OKUN MICHAEL S & OKUN BETH M       982,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1980 04 03 01 1     246651       3086       3248       2707                 
50434303170000130 LYMUS LTD SOFIA HOUSE       2,479,470.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1975 04 03 00 1     169270       3051       3250       2652                 
50434303170000140 KURZON JANE & KURZON ROBERT       3,354,031.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 2002 05 06 01 1    1233922       5122       5503       4603                 
50434303170000150 JACOBSON PHYLLIS A        564,280.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 04 03 01 1     183717       3445       3837       2988                 
50434303170000160 BEHRMAN STANLEY J &        2,661,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 2005 05 03 01 1     548071       3956       4464       3413                 
50434303170000170 LACAILLADE PETER E &        2,517,140.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1995 05 04 01 1     365677       3975       4521       3489                 
50434303170000180 NAPOLI RONALD & NAPOLI PATRICIA       2,328,960.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1985 04 03 00 1     171651       3634       3851       3212                 
50434303170000190 HICKMAN CHARLES R & HICKMAN CAROL C       606,317.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1985 04 03 00 1     307362       3789       4038       3394                 
50434303170000200 ASPLUNDH EDWARD & ASPLUNDH GWEN       2,464,916.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1980 04 03 00 1     306587       3154       3316       2809                 
50434303170000210 NICHOLSON THOMAS S THOMAS S NICHOLSON TR HLDR       851,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1970 05 03 01 1     163506       3457       3657       3057                 
50434303170000220 BERIRO ALBERT BERIRO ALBERT TR       2,022,055.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1995 05 04 01 2     967166       5050       5563       3920                 
50434303170000230 MALEY MATTHEW &        2,511,713.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 05 04 00 1     351496       4087       4149       4003                 
50434303170000240 KLEIN DIANE L        2,891,503.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 04 04 01 1     733798       3503       3635       3195                 
50434303180000011 BOBST MAMDOUHA S TR        11,688,310.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1965 05 05 01 1     639823       6208       6894       5623                 
50434303180000012 MCLAUGHLIN EDWARD F        10,906,509.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1990 05 08 00 2    1203955       7373       7880       6599                 
50434303180000020 BEAL JANE F HIRSCH E FRANKLIN TR       1,137,886.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 05 04 01 1      24567       3533       3726       3149                 
50434303180000020 BEAL JANE F HIRSCH E FRANKLIN TR       1,137,886.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 02 02 00 1       4637        560        560        560                 
50434303180000040 MEYERHOFF MARILYN        1,123,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 04 04 00 1     548999       4020       4677       3385                 
50434303180000050 WOLFE ROSE M        1,164,599.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 05 04 00 1     475431       4233       4683       3641                 
50434303180000060 JPBK PROP 2 C/O CSC SERVICES OF NEVADA, INC       3,029,153.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1970 05 04 00 1     341364       4103       4279       3738                 
50434303180000070 ROSOW I PETER &        2,696,914.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1985 04 03 00 1      15664       3381       3616       3022                 
50434303180000080 SINGER ISLAND MARINE CO        3,262,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 02 02 00 1      24939       1259       1347       1053                 
50434303180000080 SINGER ISLAND MARINE CO        3,262,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 02 02 00 1      79447       3830       4117       3707                 
50434303180000091 RATTINGER MARK D        937,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1975 05 03 01 1      31655       6309       6736       5692                 
50434303180000101 LEBOW ALAN & PATRICIA LEBOW PATRICIA       934,290.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1980 04 06 00 1     527370       6100       6333       5708                 
50434303180000120 WEBSTER CARLOTA BUSCH WEBSTER CARLOTA BUSCH TR       1,545,935.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1985 03 05 00 2     746573       4805       5657       3628                 
50434303180000130 CRAWFORD PATRICIA E TR        2,400,709.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 1     414548       4545       5175       3723                 
50434303180000140 DUDE ANGELIKA        2,607,595.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 02 00 1      23240       2659       3089       2149                 
50434303180000151 NEDERLANDER JAMES & NEDERLANDER CHARLENE       9,430,257.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 05 05 01 2    1409752       6288       6687       5057                 
50434303180000152 ENGELBERG ALFRED B & GAIL M GAIL M ENGELBERG       4,110,103.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1985 05 05 01 1    2110625       7200       8564       6347                 
50434303190000180 FISCHER DAVID T & FISCHER JENNIFER M       9,313,560.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 2003 05 07 00 2    1831749       7524       8558       6888                 
50434303200000011 OXLEY JOHN C & OXLEY DEBBY M       17,019,688.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 05 06 01 2    5575205      10679      12137       9458                 
50434303200000012 1029 N OCEAN BOULEVARD LAND TRUST        10,280,338.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1996 05 13 00 2    3904560      12948      16334      11387                 
50434303200000021 BURNS DONALD A        9,079,377.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 2001 05 04 01 2    2710836       7250       8480       6646                 
50434303200000021 BURNS DONALD A        9,079,377.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2001 02 01 01 1     262274       1734       1734       1734                 
50434303200000031 HULITAR MARY        10,714,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 05 07 01 1    1440673       9701      10382       8634                 
50434303200000031 HULITAR MARY        10,714,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 02 02 00 1      94889       1512       1680        840                 
50434303200000050 FANJUL JOSE F JR & FANJUL LOURDES M       2,219,256.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1980 05 04 01 2     483893       4979       5572       4396                 
50434303200000060 CARDEN G ALEXANDER & CARDEN STEPHANIE B       1,819,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1990 04 03 01 1     285443       6334       6510       5970                 
50434303200000070 ALEXANDER LARRY B & ALEXANDER SUSAN M       1,488,010.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1975 05 04 01 2     439620       5109       5598       4434                 
50434303200000080 FEY EDWARD G & GRACE K        2,918,396.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 04 03 01 1     362919       3384       3607       2719                 
50434303200000080 FEY EDWARD G & GRACE K        2,918,396.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1990 02 01 00 1      27321        254        423          1                 
50434303200000090 GREENBAUM LIONEL P GREENBAUM LIONEL P FOURTH RESTATED TRUST       1,051,716.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 03 04 00 1     345413       4067       4283       3662                 
50434303200000100 PIRA TRUST        3,030,605.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 04 03 00 1     488983       2995       3399       2570                 
50434303200000110 GOLDSTEIN ROBERT S        1,218,767.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 04 04 01 1     447341       4603       4990       4002                 
50434303200000120 HOFFMASTER CAYE C HOFFMASTER CAYE C TR       2,314,633.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 03 01 2    1044277       4480       4783       4039                 
50434303200000130 LEVINE ERIC M & DAYTON MILDRED C       3,648,491.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 01 01 00 2     129602        917       1171        437                 
50434303200000130 LEVINE ERIC M & DAYTON MILDRED C       3,648,491.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 04 05 01 2    1033677       5248       5644       5077                 
50434303200000140 HEPBURN CAROLE J & HEPBURN GEORGE T       697,369.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 03 01 1     227591       3847       4142       3699                 
50434303200000150 BURT PATRICIA        2,520,375.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303200000160 LOMNITZ DAVID PAUL W MORNING TR TITL HLDR       4,220,418.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    2179827       5489       6006       4991                 
50434303200000170 TURNER WALLACE R & TURNER BETSY L       1,231,294.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 04 03 01 2     316080       3196       3328       2888                 
50434303200000191 NEWMAN ADRIENNE        5,668,466.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 05 07 00 2    1553214       6736       7852       6092                 
50434303200000192 FISHER ALFRED J JR & FISHER BETTY J       4,890,732.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1985 05 04 01 2    1216222       5744       6838       5088                 
50434303200000210 CHURCH OF BETHESDA BY THE SEA        0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 03 00 1     106529       2760       3123       2656                 
50434303200000220 FURNARI GIACOMO        1,827,937.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 01 1     267683       3656       4115       3108                 
50434303200000230 MCCANN JAMES L & MCCANN SARA B       4,111,970.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1982 05 05 01 1      36070       6329       6731       5737                 
50434303200000241 RAPPAPORT STEVEN N & LEHIGH COURT LLC C/O       4,271,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 05 06 01 1     180970       7028       8578       5961                 
50434303200000261 SPILOTRO VICTOR        4,098,107.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1970 04 03 01 2      22607       4545       4951       3990                 
50434303200000280 TICE JAMES F & TICE GAY H       3,170,399.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 04 04 01 2     588493       4299       5126       3735                 
50434303200000290 MILIDRAG GEORGE D GEORGE MILIDRAG TR TITL HLDR       4,726,519.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 05 06 02 1    1142412       3667       4125       3089                 
50434303200000290 MILIDRAG GEORGE D GEORGE MILIDRAG TR TITL HLDR       4,726,519.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    1450004       5892       6278       5463                 
50434303200000300 ANSTALT MARIS 1ST NATL P B / PYMT SVCS C/O       2,633,346.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 03 00 1      52741       2562       2909       2112                 
50434303200000310 LORENTZEN PER A & LORENTZEN RACHEL C       2,001,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1975 04 03 00 2      38812       2528       2704       2236                 
50434303200000310 LORENTZEN PER A & LORENTZEN RACHEL C       2,001,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1975 04 03 01 2     301786       2624       2840       2480                 
50434303200000320 SHAVELL WADE        3,468,896.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 06 01 2    1457580       5112       5894       4612                 
50434303200000330 MOLYNEAUX MARY M        878,365.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1970 05 04 01 2     513261       5601       6416       4759                 
50434303200000340 FELDBERG ESTHER M        1,887,328.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1990 05 06 00 1    1389605       4838       5199       4407                 
50434303200000350 MANDEL STACY HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK TR       2,650,441.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1990 04 03 01 1     732764       6064       6188       5774                 
50434303200000360 HEILIGENSTEIN C E & HEILIGENSTEIN LISELOTTE       2,215,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 03 00 1     202083       3488       3662       3124                 
50434303200000370 REID JUSTUS W &        1,733,712.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1975 03 02 00 2      96187       1172       1280        920                 
50434303200000370 REID JUSTUS W &        1,733,712.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1985 05 04 01 2     641563       4100       4813       3275                 
50434303200000380 ROEBLING KATE M EST HARRINGTON LYNN C/O       2,675,152.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 04 03 00 1      92989       2804       2974       2531                 
50434303200000390 SCHWARTZ GLORVINA R        1,232,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 03 00 1      22237       2802       3069       2472                 
50434303200000400 JOHNSON REUBEN B III & MARY E WATKINS H/W       2,817,444.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1985 03 02 00 1     109796       1293       1416       1240                 
50434303200000400 JOHNSON REUBEN B III & MARY E WATKINS H/W       2,817,444.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1995 05 07 00 2    1610795       8115       9040       6310                 
50434303200000411 BRANDNER REINHARD & BRANDNER CLAUDIA M       1,335,955.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 03 04 01 1      32574       3941       4474       3274                 
50434303200000430 FINNEGAN KAREN & FINNEGAN BRENT       3,475,203.00 0.33 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 05 01 1    2140162       5221       6032       4702                 
50434303200000440 WATSON H MITCHELL JR & WATSON KATHERINE S       3,425,292.00 0.33 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 04 01 2    2244463       5224       6247       4384                 
50434303200000450 ZIMMER ROBERT H        644,215.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1970 04 03 01 1     125315       3388       4040       2872                 
50434303200000460 ALLEMAN JOAN        1,445,121.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 05 06 00 2     161616       6785       7396       6290                 
50434303200000470 ROBBINS CLIFTON S ROBBINS 1995 CHILDRENS TRUST       16,980,709.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1998 05 07 01 2    4319280       9697      10753       8757                 
50434303200000481 GORDON ROBERT G & ARLETTE B GORDON ARLETTE B       4,149,252.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 05 06 01 1    1643503      10687      12178       9723                 
50434303200000500 DONNELLEY ELLIOTT R        1,091,623.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 05 06 01 2      35604       6791       7202       6516                 
50434303200000511 GORDON LEE B & GORDON SUSAN S       1,418,785.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 05 04 00 2     437238       4341       4593       4099                 
50434303200000530 NORTH JOHN L & JOHN L NORTH ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       978,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 03 00 1      25581       3501       3739       3069                 
50434303200000540 ERLBAUM GARY E &        3,581,191.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 05 05 01 2     981887       5534       6006       5068                 
50434303200000550 ABRAHAM JAMES        3,764,684.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1990 05 06 00 2    1166074       5440       6036       4856                 
50434303200000560 KAYE WILLIAM A & KAYE LISA K       792,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 04 06 01 2     638319       5614       5799       5184                 
50434303200000570 FERNANDEZ LUIS J & LILLIAN F LILLIAN F FERNANDEZ       922,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1980 04 05 01 2     897876       6113       6552       5661                 
50434303200000580 SZALAY ROBERT N & SZALAY NANCY K       3,660,548.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 05 05 01 1    2038573       4657       4951       4256                 
50434303200000590 BERTLES JAMES B & LISA P BERTLES LISA P       1,177,333.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1990 05 04 01 2    1034362       5582       6427       5153                 
50434303200000600 HANRAHAN DENIS DENIS HANRAHAN TR TITL HLDR       863,435.00 0.33 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1990 05 04 01 2     776021       4366       4936       3608                 
50434303200000610 APPEL HELEN L        4,728,162.00 0.33 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1996 00 07 01 2    2116150       5834       6490       5177                 
50434303200000620 SLOTKIN MITCHELL & PAMELA SLOTKIN PAMELA       627,696.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 02 01 00 1      40472        548        672        260                 
50434303200000620 SLOTKIN MITCHELL & PAMELA SLOTKIN PAMELA       627,696.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 03 01 1      17125       2268       2268       2268                 
50434303200000640 EDEN DODGE ESTATES ASSN INC L HEILIGENSTEIN C/O       48.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434303240000030 SCHOLL ADELE J        274,162.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 03 02 00 1      72020       1870       2021       1341                 
50434303240000041 WHEELER D JERRY &        2,741,172.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 06 01 2    1274808       4517       5178       3992                 
50434303240000070 QUINN JOHN J III & QUINN MARY AGNES OCONNOR       2,733,417.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    1160077       5763       6007       5272                 
50434303240000100 TORREY WILLIAM SR &        1,595,780.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 2000 04 03 01 2     150783       2554       2712       2340                 
50434303240000120 DEBUS FLORIDA PARTNERSHIP LP GUY RABIDEAU ESQUIRE C/O       1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434303240000140 DEBUS FLORIDA PARTNERSHIP L P GUY RABIDEAU ESQ C/O       1,675,178.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 2000 04 02 00 1     218979       3977       4857       3295                 
50434310000010010 FALCIONE A F & FALCIONE DOMENICA L       12,434,310.00 1.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1995 00 08 01 1    1825156      10800      11105      10214                 
50434310000010020 GOODMAN JOAN M        8,329,289.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1975 1975 00 03 01 1     834759       6851       7650       5931                 
50434310000010020 GOODMAN JOAN M        8,329,289.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1976 00 03 01 1     151215       1923       2338       1761                 
50434310000010020 GOODMAN JOAN M        8,329,289.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1990 00 03 01 2    1573889      12015      13968       9880                 
50434310000010021 DU PONT GENEVIEVE        4,297,781.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1965 05 07 01 1    1220610      11909      13485       8523                 
50434310000010022 947 N OCEAN BLVD TRUST RICHARD KARELITZ C/O       22,772,888.00 1.62 VACANT                           
50434310000010023 PERELMAN RAYMOND G & RUTH RUTH PERELMAN       4,751,525.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1978 02 01 01 1      21855        248        248        248                 
50434310000010023 PERELMAN RAYMOND G & RUTH RUTH PERELMAN       4,751,525.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1988 05 05 01 2     760775       7855       9165       7705                 
50434310000010025 FRIEDMAN LORRAINE L & LORRAINE FRIEDMAN TR TITL HLDR       7,602,499.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1980 05 05 01 2     591760       9137      11686       6621                 
50434310000010025 FRIEDMAN LORRAINE L & LORRAINE FRIEDMAN TR TITL HLDR       7,602,499.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1998 02 02 00 1      87063        932       1141        798                 
50434310000010025 FRIEDMAN LORRAINE L & LORRAINE FRIEDMAN TR TITL HLDR       7,602,499.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1998 02 02 00 1      99057       1127       1146       1119                 
50434310000010025 FRIEDMAN LORRAINE L & LORRAINE FRIEDMAN TR TITL HLDR       7,602,499.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 01 01 01 3     183044       2708       3082       1834                 
50434310000010030 MENIN CRAIG I VEGOSEN DEAN TR       11,486,924.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 2000 05 09 00 2    2720077      16880      19286      12937                 
50434310000010040 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB INC        12,966,777.00 84.01 GOLF COURSE 1935 1947 00 02 00 1.5      68771       1437       1500       1080 1955 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     451730      11621         
50434310000010040 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB INC        12,966,777.00 84.01 GOLF COURSE 1935 1947 00 02 00 1.5      68771       1437       1500       1080 1972 1972 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      84920       2400         
50434310000010040 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB INC        12,966,777.00 84.01 GOLF COURSE 1935 1947 00 02 00 1.5      68771       1437       1500       1080 1988 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    6537430      55540         
50434310000010040 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB INC        12,966,777.00 84.01 GOLF COURSE 1935 1947 00 02 00 1.5      68771       1437       1500       1080 1999 1999 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      72310       1070         
50434310000010040 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB INC        12,966,777.00 84.01 GOLF COURSE 1935 1947 00 02 00 1.5      68771       1437       1500       1080 2000 2000 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     295300       3072         
50434310000010050 MACK SONDRA & MACK DAVID S       10,749,765.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1992 05 06 01 1    1659567      10148      12132       8893                 
50434310000010052 CENTURY WINES & SPIRITS INC        13,441,738.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1990 05 06 01 2    1806274       7955       8503       7448                 
50434310000020010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.01 MUNICIPAL                           
50434310000030010 700 NORTH LAKE LLC KKR C/O       54,094,071.00 5.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2005 00 03 01 2    3611926      14729      16512      13189                 
50434310000030010 700 NORTH LAKE LLC KKR C/O       54,094,071.00 5.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2005 02 02 00 1     145583       1560       1560       1560                 
50434310000030010 700 NORTH LAKE LLC KKR C/O       54,094,071.00 5.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2005 02 02 00 1     162941       1812       1920       1560                 
50434310000030013 ENGEL JAMES M & ENGEL AMELIA G       6,678,141.00 0.57 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 2002 04 04 01 1    2990114       6648       7754       5707                 
50434310000040010 PELTZ NELSON PELTZ CLAUDIA L       17,267,250.00 4.4486 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434310010000010 BIRMINGHAM PAUL J & BIRMINGHAM PAMELA A       482,992.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 04 03 01 1     119007       3843       4024       3533                 
50434310010000020 MANSON WILLIAM J JR & MANSON ANNE T       2,052,665.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1991 04 03 00 1     599696       3965       4516       3283                 
50434310010000030 BOYKIN SAM M & MARY P        893,103.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 05 00 1     814161       3836       4002       3502                 
50434310010000040 AMLING CYNTHIA AMLING CYNTHIA TR       759,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1990 04 03 00 1     378672       2800       2976       2410                 
50434310010000050 HABERMANN BEATRICE JOHN BECKER C/O       1,492,224.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1975 03 03 00 1      48217       2628       2628       2628                 
50434310010000060 UNITED STATES TRUST CO NY TR        1,652,522.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1991 03 03 00 1     208333       2336       2600       2104                 
50434310010000070 BRIGGS MARTHA C & BURNHAM CAROL C       1,206,523.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1955 04 03 00 1       7042       2362       2585       2263                 
50434310010000080 ALLISON J RICHARD        801,579.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1941 1953 04 03 01 1      64824       2517       3050       2402                 
50434310010000090 IVES PHILIP A & CAROL C IVES CAROL C       452,456.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 04 03 00 1     140567       2910       3140       2234                 
50434310010000100 VESLEY SCOTT        1,232,471.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1995 03 03 00 1     212446       3503       3931       3137                 
50434310010000110 GORDON SCOTT M & GORDON VIRGINIA O       2,185,653.00 0.7138 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1990 05 06 00 1    1153032       7526       7825       7122                 
50434310010000120 PARKER THOMAS X & PARKER MARY V       855,671.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1980 04 04 01 2     192834       3368       3720       2960                 
50434310010000130 LEADER JOSHUA M & LEADER CELESTE M &       1,550,812.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1965 04 03 01 2     154426       3333       3944       3136                 
50434310010000140 ONEAL MARJORIE H ONEAL MARJORIE H TR       517,445.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 03 01 2     237777       3718       4186       3532                 
50434310010000150 WEEKS J WILLIAM        650,865.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1977 04 03 01 1     435211       2879       3270       2280                 
50434310010000160 FRENEY JAMES R &        1,273,344.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1975 04 03 01 2     274875       3049       3550       2635                 
50434310010000170 BARTON DAVID W JR BARTON CAROL U       582,166.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 03 02 00 1     100578       2365       2724       1916                 
50434310010000180 DENARVAEZ EDITH T        2,513,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 2    1045887       4333       4576       3985                 
50434310010000190 KAZEN KATHLEEN A        684,733.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 03 03 00 1     100493       2362       2780       2027                 
50434310010000200 PHIPPS PLAZA PARTNERS LLC        1,453,344.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 03 02 01 1       6710       2523       2620       2284                 
50434310010000210 WEARN JAMES MC C        373,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1975 04 03 00 1      97420       2290       2921       1831                 
50434310010000220 WHITEHOUSE W F & WHITEHOUSE MARGARET A       424,528.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 02 02 00 1     116886       2490       2743       1634                 
50434310010000230 RUDICK A JOSEPH        1,444,632.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1965 04 03 01 2     140808       2952       2952       2952                 
50434310010000240 RAESE ELIZABETH S & RAESE JOHN R       2,841,291.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 2000 00 06 00 2    1339191       6124       6934       5476                 
50434310010000251 FISHER MARJORIE S REVOCABLE TRUST FISHER MARJORIE S TRUSTEE       3,602,990.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 08 00 2    1420878       6545       7508       5780                 
50434310010000270 STERN BURTON & STERN BARBARA       5,908,844.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 04 01 1    2946208       7687       9015       6927                 
50434310010000280 FISHER MARJORIE S FISHER MARJORIE S TR       10,112,197.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1976 02 01 01 1      25356        265        324        240                 
50434310010000280 FISHER MARJORIE S FISHER MARJORIE S TR       10,112,197.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1980 05 07 01 2    1292247       8882      10537       7108                 
50434310020000011 COFFIN JOYCE C        580,404.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1985 04 03 01 1     275035       3087       3229       2855                 
50434310020000012 BAHAMA BEACH HOLDINGS LLC        2,507,194.00 0.31 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 04 03 01 2     194217       3237       3394       3330                 
50434310020000030 MCCANN CAMILLE V        497,487.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 04 03 00 1     147540       2799       3033       2266                 
50434310020000040 FARINAS ALINA A        531,226.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 03 03 00 1     257844       3185       3405       2831                 
50434310020000050 CLARK ANNE C        2,154,825.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 04 03 00 1     324368       2419       2859       1932                 
50434310020000060 POOLE B ALYSON        1,408,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1990 03 04 00 1      13565       2492       2861       2127                 
50434310020000070 CAHALL RICHARD J & CHRISTINA CAHALL CHRISTINA       614,982.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 03 01 2     337607       3173       3350       3332                 
50434310020000080 GEISLER PETER N & CONSTANCE W CONSTANCE WHEELER GEISLER       824,665.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1986 04 03 01 2     448146       3339       3628       2878                 
50434310020000090 VANPELT SUSAN        1,058,188.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 04 03 01 1     225470       2932       3102       2546                 
50434310020000100 BEASLEY JAMES W JR & ELIZABETH MARSHALL-BEASLEY H/W       684,953.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1970 04 03 01 1     413556       3984       4375       3386                 
50434310020000111 TITCOMB E RODMAN JR & CECILY J CECILY J TITCOMB       1,197,406.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1990 05 04 01 2     746766       4405       4753       3980                 
50434310020000120 BOARDMAN D DIXON &        6,348,785.00 0.5489 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1995 03 03 00 1     676658       3259       3623       2873                 
50434310020000120 BOARDMAN D DIXON &        6,348,785.00 0.5489 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1995 05 06 00 2     919110       4590       4877       4046                 
50434310020000140 BOAG        2,217,689.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 02 02 00 1     178306       2753       3234       2203                 
50434310020000150 BAKER BRENDA TR        536,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1975 04 03 00 1      10418       2386       3061       1984                 
50434310020000160 GRAHAM IAN H        2,585,475.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 03 00 2     974162       4149       4386       3759                 
50434310020000170 PALM BEACH POOH LLC        3,019,938.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 03 00 2     945881       4014       4350       3717                 
50434310020000180 WRIGHT E TOWNSEND JR & WRIGHT E MARY S       1,342,642.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 04 04 01 1     420357       2976       3142       2668                 
50434310020000190 MCALLISTER SUSAN        1,726,534.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 04 00 1     244260       3168       3427       2464                 
50434310020000200 CHOPIN SUSAN        1,259,438.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1995 03 03 01 1     682275       3247       3478       2819                 
50434310020000210 JACKSON MICHAEL J & JACKSON PATRICIA R       3,825,727.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    1755029       4023       4566       3583                 
50434310020000220 GOFFE BONNIE L        781,583.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1970 05 03 01 1     383405       4455       5224       3766                 
50434310020010000 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.011 MUNICIPAL                           
50434310020020000 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.1575 MUNICIPAL                           
50434310030000010 FISHER JEROME & ANNE C ANNE C FISHER       18,332,441.00 1.9 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 09 00 2    8996572      25074      30011      19646                 
50434310030000030 MORRIS L LEVINSON TRUST        2,898,931.00 1.3194 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1960 04 03 00 2      12324       3188       3446       2230                 
50434310030000030 MORRIS L LEVINSON TRUST        2,898,931.00 1.3194 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1985 05 05 01 2     488223       4667       4792       4283                 
50434310030000041 WOODS LANDING LLC LAWRENCE S BLUMBERG C/O       3,239.00 0.01 VACANT                           
50434310030000042 WOODS LANDING LLC LAWRENCE S BLUMBERG C/O       2,810,615.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 05 03 01 1     122618       3440       3651       3299                 
50434310030000052 FAIRCHILD ROBERT F HOUSE OF BURGUNDY C/O       3,345,493.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 04 04 00 1     657372       3578       3997       3032                 
50434310030000053 BENTON BLANCHE M TR        2,236,077.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1985 04 03 01 1     949142       4034       4494       3534                 
50434310030000121 MINIKES CHERYL &        6,059,064.00 0.5289 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 06 07 01 1    2169789       6063       6520       5560                 
50434310030000141 TASELAAR PIETER & TASELAAR NINA       3,209,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 00 05 2    1262294       4515       4961       4058                 
50434310030000142 BARNETT MARIAN S BARNETT MARIAN S TR       673,069.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 05 05 00 1     348552       3442       3826       3038                 
50434310030000210 BURK RICHARD B TR        0.00 0 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434310030000220 VSS HOLDINGS CORP        0.00 0 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434310030000240 BERKLEY JOHN R        1,576,043.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 04 04 00 2     846730       3991       4749       3567                 
50434310030000250 GWALTNEY FAMILY PARTNERS LTD NANCY R GWALTNEY C/O       2,742,751.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1998 03 04 00 2     907461       3772       4192       3292                 
50434310030000261 WEXLER GARY &        2,119,494.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 04 01 2     984170       3715       4402       3114                 
50434310030000262 UMBACH LOIS        940,982.00 0.29 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1968 04 03 00 1      25549       2870       3385       2301                 
50434310030000262 UMBACH LOIS        940,982.00 0.29 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1973 03 02 00 1       7601        764        882        735                 
50434310030000271 BRYAN VIVIAN G TR NANCY H CANARY ESQ C/O       0.00 0.009 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434310040000050 BEACH CLUB INC        2,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL                           
50434310040000110 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB        1,207,560.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL                           
50434310040000130 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB        1,526,612.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1953 04 03 00 1      86612       2246       2926       1955                 
50434310040000150 REHL SUZANNE SCHOCH REHL SUZANNE SCHOCH TR       2,394,972.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2002 04 04 01 1    1481702       4335       4931       3969                 
50434310040000170 OCONNELL LINDA P        2,713,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 2    1254796       4449       4854       4105                 
50434310040000190 KAPNER L & DAWN KAPNER DAWN       370,767.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 03 00 1     120396       2344       2761       2185                 
50434310040000210 264 COUNTRY CLUB LLC        1,446,224.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 03 02 00 1       6224       2385       2814       2047                 
50434310040000230 CIVITELLA M J III & BARBARA N        2,215,870.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     743383       4802       5131       4397                 
50434310040000250 ROBINSON KAREN L        524,832.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 03 00 1     240148       3400       3716       3018                 
50434310040000270 DEL DEO RALPH N &        776,730.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 04 03 00 1      80922       2867       3091       2471                 
50434310040000290 UNDERWOOD ANTONY S & MARY J        1,633,987.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 03 04 00 1     188927       2640       2778       2263                 
50434310040000310 FIX ALFRED H & FIX PATRICIA A       539,160.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1960 03 03 00 1      23300       1905       1905       1905                 
50434310040000330 ROGERS LEONARD G ROGERS LEONARD G TR       1,775,130.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     548011       4461       4669       4083                 
50434310040000350 PALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB        2,160,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310040000450 ALEXANDER ALLISON C        317,778.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 03 03 00 1     123340       1895       2079       1642                 
50434310040000470 HARDY LESLEY B & HARDY WILLIAM A       388,161.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1975 03 02 00 1     122121       2465       2514       2514                 
50434310040000490 GENIESER WERNER R &        2,384,712.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 03 01 1     919657       3590       3927       3086                 
50434310040000510 SPERO RAND K  &        1,985,012.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 05 01 1    1319349       3616       3905       3195                 
50434310040000530 BASA GROUP LLC        1,603,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 04 04 00 1     161045       2872       2991       2621                 
50434310040000550 JONES RICHARD E & JONES POLLY S       1,133,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 03 02 00 1     195545       2466       2637       2182                 
50434310040000570 WEXNER HENRY D & SUZETTE W WEXNER SUZETTE W       387,775.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 04 03 00 1      33087       2442       2536       2224                 
50434310040000590 TAPLIN LIBBY        467,053.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 04 03 01 1     248403       3382       3588       2934                 
50434310040000610 SAYRE HOLLAND R        412,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1975 02 03 00 1     112535       2713       2799       2513                 
50434310040000630 SORREL ELIZABETH        2,173,142.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 2000 00 04 01 2     773713       4145       4330       3802                 
50434310040000650 ZDARSKY AXEL        1,622,156.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 02 01 2    1003035       4516       4713       4105                 
50434310040000670 SCHATTIE RICHARD J TR JANE E PETRICK       1,585,014.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 04 03 00 1     144631       2751       2751       2751                 
50434310040000690 MEEK MARJORIE M & MARJORIE MEEK TR TITL HLDR       1,763,629.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 01 1     862649       3945       4143       3523                 
50434310040000710 KOZOKOFF NEIL J HIRSH SALLY K TR       1,965,360.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 03 03 01 1    1041483       4179       4513       3723                 
50434310040000730 BAHL FORREST J II & BAHL AMY DUKES       1,549,001.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 03 04 00 1     206391       3281       3434       2952                 
50434310040000750 RAMPELL PAUL & RAMPELL RITA B       358,293.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 04 02 00 1      44747       2079       2123       1997                 
50434310040000770 LEVIN J & MARIE LEVIN MARIE       308,128.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1970 03 02 00 1      47128       1926       1943       1919                 
50434310040000790 THOMAS MARY JO THOMAS MARY JO TR       366,216.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 04 03 00 1     114662       2237       2354       1964                 
50434310040000810 RITMAN SIDNEY & IRENE RITMAN TR TITL HLDR       4,380,893.00 0.4866 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    2261509       7502       8439       6727                 
50434310040000850 ST GEORGE JERROLD &        896,918.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1995 04 03 00 1     332414       2907       3081       2532                 
50434310040000871 BYNUM T EDWARD & DEARBORN SUSAN       1,628,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1970 04 03 00 1     182950       3155       3334       2757                 
50434310040000890 222 RIDGEVIEW LLC ALAN J CIKLIN ESQ C/O       2,955,564.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 04 05 01 2    1484127       4269       4408       3946                 
50434310040000910 SADLER ROBERT E JR        2,771,398.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 04 05 01     1290412       4764       5080       4416                 
50434310040000930 WHITAKER DONALD R JR & WHITAKER DONNA L       2,915,328.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 04 06 01 2    1451436       4865       5119       4504                 
50434310040000950 GRONEWALDT ALICE B TRUST FBO HAGER LOUIS B JR       3,093,199.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    1620519       4630       5012       4194                 
50434310040000970 PALM BEACH VENTURES IV LLC        1,487,647.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 03 02 00 1      47330       2213       2520       1752                 
50434310040000990 DUNST DIANE G        919,238.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 03 02 00 1     201342       2581       2926       2222                 
50434310040001010 HAISFIELD AUDREY LEA SHAPIRO RUTH TR       4,083,690.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 05 05 01 2    2002406       8558       9130       8053                 
50434310040001051 BLOOMSDAY TRUST        3,914,625.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310040001090 LAMBERT DAVID G        7,250,634.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 01 2    5060802      11022      13479       8022                 
50434310040001130 CARMICHAEL ANNE P DONALD CARMICHAEL RESIDUARY TRUST       1,243,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1980 05 05 01 2     562420       5689       5901       5195                 
50434310040001130 CARMICHAEL ANNE P DONALD CARMICHAEL RESIDUARY TRUST       1,243,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 02 01 00 1      43465        432        432        432                 
50434310040001140 MURPHY N E & MURPHY SARAH S       1,479,129.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1980 05 07 01 2    1012717       9788      10181       9516                 
50434310040001150 BERGER KAREN BERGER MARTIN       3,586,691.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 08 00 2    1578414       6459       6931       5974                 
50434310040001161 GLICKMAN DONALD &        2,411,095.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1995 03 03 01 1     526049       3192       3294       2993                 
50434310040001170 VECELLIO CHRISTOPHER        3,894,595.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 2000 05 04 01 1    1344499       5337       6016       4768                 
50434310040001180 FURLAUD ISABEL TR        3,146,737.00 0.57 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 07 01 1     675358       6671       8088       5708                 
50434310040001191 KANTOR GEORGE S        2,744,322.00 0.72 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1950 03 02 00 1      86792       1584       1584       1584                 
50434310040001191 KANTOR GEORGE S        2,744,322.00 0.72 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 08 00 2    1947068       8360      12169       6503                 
50434310040001200 SLOPE TRAIL LLC        5,428,286.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 05 06 01 2    2045099       6682       7308       6156                 
50434310040001211 WEST PALM BEACH CITY OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1940 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      41060        928         
50434310040001212 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434310040001230 BAKER CHRISTINA & BAKER ROBERT C       9,113,064.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 05 09 01 2    3448229      13195      15846      10222                 
50434310040001240 HUMPHREYS ODETTE L HUMPHREYS ODETTE L TR       2,498,972.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1951 04 03 00 1      11232       3483       3887       2953                 
50434310040001250 GOTTFRIED PAMELA        5,709,241.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 00 11 01 2    2973538      14871      20063       7343                 
50434310040001260 BURNAP BARTLETT        11,330,141.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 06 06 01 2    4899220      11706      15487      10461                 
50434310040001271 LANE NANCY Z        9,535,165.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 05 05 01 2    1970374       8374      10411       7023                 
50434310050000010 COHEN ROBERT B &        36,287,454.00 2.69 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1957 03 02 00 2     220361       2760       3029       2132                 
50434310050000010 COHEN ROBERT B &        36,287,454.00 2.69 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 05 07 01 2    3412768      20815      33068      16574                 
50434310050000010 COHEN ROBERT B &        36,287,454.00 2.69 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1957 03 01 01 1     198032       1156       1168       1128                 
50434310050000021 FISHER KATHLEEN FISHER BROTHERS C/O       20,181,047.00 1.9746 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1985 05 07 00 1.5      45984       6617       7230       5497                 
50434310050000031 BLUMENSTEIN HAROLD & BLUMENSTEIN PENNY B       5,645,209.00 0.62 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 08 01 2    2297927       8351       9877       7233                 
50434310050000032 LAR ARTEMIS 1 LLC & LAR ARTEMIS 2 LLC       28,857,788.00 3.0222 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1965 05 09 01 1     119288      13430      14743      12514                 
50434310050000052 SANDERS ALICE & SANDERS LEWIS       33,327,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310050000053 OCEANSIDE PALMS ESTATE CORP GC CONSULTANTS C/O       429,870.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310050000054 OCEANSIDE PALMS ESTATE CORP GC CONSULTANTS INC C/O       33,152,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 02 02 00 1     152905       2057       2814       1199                 
50434310050000054 OCEANSIDE PALMS ESTATE CORP GC CONSULTANTS INC C/O       33,152,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1990 03 03 00 1    1156123       2673       3278       2376                 
50434310050000054 OCEANSIDE PALMS ESTATE CORP GC CONSULTANTS INC C/O       33,152,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1990 05 07 01 1    3419459       7872       9301       7259                 
50434310050000055 NORTH KING COUNTY LLC        1,602,667.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1995 05 04 01 1     381898       4021       4583       3383                 
50434310060000010 JAMES CHARLES S & JAMES MICHELE G       2,415,490.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310060000020 GUTTMAN WILLIAM M & SUSAN G SUSAN G GUTTMAN       727,988.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 04 03 00 1     308759       3467       4277       2830                 
50434310060000030 KLEMM DAVID R & CAROLYN V KLEMM ET AL TR HLDRS       1,252,790.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 04 05 00 1     338991       3818       4284       3368                 
50434310060000040 VECELLIO MICHAEL A        2,780,253.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 2000 03 03 00 1     952637       4613       5672       3904                 
50434310060000050 SOBEL HARVEY        1,107,522.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1995 04 03 01 1     545168       3778       4713       3006                 
50434310060000061 OBER DAVID G        950,762.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1975 04 03 00 1     211650       2819       3160       2537                 
50434310060000062 ECHARTE ELENA A        651,090.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1975 04 03 01 1     228517       2932       3354       2826                 
50434310060000081 METTLER PETER W        655,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 04 03 01 1     272474       3459       3873       2940                 
50434310060000090 IOVINO THOMAS & JUOLAU CONTRACTING INC C/O       4,659,972.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 2000 05 04 01 1     509455       4259       4754       3546                 
50434310060000090 IOVINO THOMAS & JUOLAU CONTRACTING INC C/O       4,659,972.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1980 03 03 00 1     154944       1335       1756       1155                 
50434310060000110 LANE TRINA        806,957.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1976 04 03 01 2     556593       3618       3868       3361                 
50434310060000120 STEWART J REED EVELYN C BURKE TR TITL HLDR       2,607,214.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 04 03 00 1     324288       3819       4538       3317                 
50434310060000130 SLATER SELMA T        1,381,563.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1995 00 03 00 1     701797       4085       4841       3311                 
50434310060000140 ALBAN JAMES C III & ALBAN DOROTHY G       3,416,418.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 05 01 1    2240406       5150       5462       4503                 
50434310060000150 SIMSES ROBERT G & MARY A MC GOWAN       793,363.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1990 04 03 01 1     529631       5196       5679       4704                 
50434310060000160 PRIOR-PALMER JULIA M        2,528,509.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 04 03 00 1     110145       3714       4041       2975                 
50434310060000170 CHASTAIN THOMAS M TR        2,745,979.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 04 03 00 1     306943       4004       4679       3406                 
50434310060000180 VANNECK WILLIAM P VANNECK WILLIAM P TR       1,113,155.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 04 03 01 1     349487       4115       4370       3749                 
50434310060000190 GELATS N J & MARGARITA R GELATS MARGARITA R       645,273.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 04 03 01 1     247850       3301       3945       2737                 
50434310060000200 ODASSO LORRAINE        1,290,548.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 04 03 00 2     443677       5175       5261       4973                 
50434310070000010 DUNCKER CHARLES S        3,912,179.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 04 05 01 2    1427362       5416       6246       4718                 
50434310070000020 209 VIA LINDA LLC        2,240,359.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 04 03 00 1     243184       2897       3043       2583                 
50434310070000030 PHELPS EDWIN L & PHELPS LINDA M       1,998,495.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1995 04 03 00 1      14370       2742       3021       2370                 
50434310070000040 ROGERS JOHN S & ROGERS HEATHER W       1,755,344.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 04 03 01 1      14142       3052       3297       2445                 
50434310070000050 KEMP BEVERLY J        466,721.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 04 03 01 1     213405       2807       3003       2483                 
50434310070000060 CALDWELL MANLEY P JR        458,988.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 04 03 01 1     204726       2726       2906       2334                 
50434310070000070 BALLENTINE JAMES M        757,706.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 04 03 01 1     242169       3258       3438       2878                 
50434310070000080 HENDERSON MAUREEN A & HENDERSON PETER W       2,929,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 03 01 1     187426       3321       3760       2756                 
50434310070000090 SCHULHOF MICHAEL P &        2,797,233.00 0.2944 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1980 05 05 01 2     411965       4530       5277       3718                 
50434310070000100 COLEMAN C PAYSON & COLEMAN CATHARINE C       1,982,773.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1996 04 04 00 1     389583       4272       4832       3697                 
50434310070000110 APPLEBAUM EUGENE & APPLEBAUM MARCIA       16,312,101.00 0.9436 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 07 01 2    3727103       9580      11416       7731                 
50434310070000131 FROMER ROBERT L FROMER ANN R       11,596,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 05 06 00 1     529403       6607       7096       5826                 
50434310070000132 AGRESTI JOYCE R        2,664,798.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1988 03 04 00 1     390915       3466       4120       2714                 
50434310070000141 PB REAL ESTATE LLC        2,983,486.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 02 02 00 1     190113       2132       2541       1769                 
50434310070000151 LABBETT DEREK LABBETT WENDY       1,922,044.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1970 05 05 01 1     749679       4996       5272       4412                 
50434310070000170 TICE KENNETH J H & TICE NICOLETTE W       742,888.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 03 00 1     210971       2678       3014       2219                 
50434310070000180 GAZDIK FAMILY ENTERPRISES INC C/O STROMBERG & TARONE PLC       2,022,572.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 05 03 01 2      20947       4242       4474       3882                 
50434310070000190 WAINSCOTT BARBARA S        1,517,314.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 03 00 1     331421       2857       3104       2547                 
50434310070000200 GLADSTONE JONATHAN        746,685.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 03 00 1     220426       2798       2952       2480                 
50434310070000210 KAHLE G KENT &        1,996,390.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1970 03 02 01 1      12265       2647       2963       2241                 
50434310070000220 MCCORMICK MATTHEW B & HOEFT CHADWICK A       1,160,647.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 04 03 00 1     232290       2914       3046       2606                 
50434310070000230 SEGRAVES PATRICK W & SUELLEN V SEGRAVES       1,416,697.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 04 04 00 1     223523       2760       3060       2365                 
50434310070000240 200 VIA LINDA ASSOCIATES LLC        1,609,792.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 04 03 00 1      11467       2625       2782       2295                 
50434310080000010 DANTON RICHARD & BURAKOFF ESTHER       1,736,396.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 04 03 00 2     331755       3380       3750       2964                 
50434310080000020 BOEHM HELEN LIPSETT        1,398,622.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1960 04 03 01 1       8622       2785       2996       2347                 
50434310080000030 NOLEN TIMOTHY O & SUSAN O SUSAN O NOLEN       485,235.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 04 03 01 1     212010       3188       3494       2900                 
50434310080000040 KORZIS JOHN        1,626,270.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 03 01 1     178930       3319       3584       2794                 
50434310080000050 KEOGH DESMOND & KEOGH CRISTINA       2,208,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 2000 05 04 01 1      58429       4431       4586       4269                 
50434310080000070 ELLIOTT WALTER J IV & COFFIN MARY K       1,099,746.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 04 03 00 1     159749       2969       3097       2738                 
50434310080000080 DIESEL JOHN & DIESEL-GUERNSEY JOY       383,648.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1995 04 03 00 1     256673       3114       3610       2603                 
50434310080000090 MILLER RICHARD J & IRENE T MILLER IRENE T       457,869.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1965 04 03 01 1      45378       3283       3683       2756                 
50434310080000100 WIDEMAN FLOYD JR & LOIS LOIS WIDEMAN       634,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1975 04 03 01 1     196417       3649       4100       3087                 
50434310080000110 GIMBEL THOMAS S        1,857,930.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1965 04 03 01 1     406551       3388       3525       3048                 
50434310080000120 CASSIDY  MERCEDES Q        1,768,092.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 03 03 00 1     320589       2975       3134       2795                 
50434310080000130 HALL STEPHEN D & BETSEY W BETSEY W HALL       502,149.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 03 01 1      81215       3280       3483       2853                 
50434310080000140 FELL EILEEN        1,361,984.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 05 05 00 1     510912       3943       3943       3943                 
50434310080000150 DILLARD PEGGY O & PEGGY DILLARD TR TITL HLDR       1,148,695.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 04 03 01 1     194264       3296       3460       2994                 
50434310080000160 ZDARSKY KONSTANTIN A RICHARD J SCHATTIE TR       1,027,665.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 05 04 01 2     412538       4115       4553       3815                 
50434310090000010 GRABOW JOHN C &        835,646.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 04 03 00 1     147067       3044       3463       2672                 
50434310090000020 RATTINGER NICOLE        1,277,084.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 04 02 00 1      46107       1946       1973       1882                 
50434310090000030 GOLDING HARRIET        283,598.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 03 02 00 1      33775       2710       3146       2406                 
50434310090000040 DEAN ROBERT A & LOUISA A DEAN LOUISA A       361,318.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 04 03 00 1      99709       2610       3093       2418                 
50434310090000050 SMITH CHARLES W        1,474,953.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1960 04 03 00 1      23342       2195       2372       1783                 
50434310090000060 BRADY ROBERT V &        1,229,707.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310090000070 VIATOR MARY M        356,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 03 00 1     119488       2470       2685       2125                 
50434310090000080 FURLAUD RICHARD M TRUST        1,557,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1970 04 03 00 1     112834       2335       2499       1953                 
50434310090000090 LARCHEVESQUE PAUL E &        2,265,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 06 01 1     799797       4416       5114       3910                 
50434310090000100 NISENBAUM LAYNE D NISENBAUM LAYNE D TR       3,391,557.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 01 2    1639517       5534       6528       4797                 
50434310090000111 MINIKES CHERYL        12,162,231.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434310100000010 FLOYD RAYMOND &        11,013,443.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1     720118       2738       3432       1988                 
50434310100000010 FLOYD RAYMOND &        11,013,443.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    2483438       8552      10380       7962                 
50434310100000020 RICHMAN RICHARD P &        14,612,265.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    2946420      10094      10715       9399                 
50434310100000030 MONELL LILI C        15,689,943.00 1.4961 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1994 05 04 01 1    1167142       7263       7765       6705                 
50434310100000030 MONELL LILI C        15,689,943.00 1.4961 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1967 05 04 00 1      99376       4343       4739       3827                 
50434310100000050 KOPP WILLIAM H        741,285.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1955 03 03 00 1     143049       2295       2493       1869                 
50434310100000060 FRANCIS PATRICIA P TRUST        1,054,317.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 05 03 01 2     591833       4608       4992       4180                 
50434310100000070 304 PLANTATION LLC        931,641.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 03 01 1     189381       2425       2555       2211                 
50434310100000080 CLECKNER RUTH        684,359.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 04 03 01 1     119274       3331       3912       2642                 
50434310100000091 HENRY PATRICK & HEATHER C HENRY HEATHER C       878,330.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 05 06 01 2     503737       5827       6452       5262                 
50434310100000100 DE LA BEGASSIERE DIANE TR        3,796,432.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1985 04 03 01 1     323920       3181       3332       2840                 
50434310100000100 DE LA BEGASSIERE DIANE TR        3,796,432.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1966 02 01 00 1      31527        445        504        420                 
50434310100000111 CURTIS LINDA M        1,320,242.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1985 04 04 01 1    1287294       4652       4855       4179                 
50434310100000112 STORY HOWARD & FRITZI STORY FRITZI       739,603.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 04 04 01 1     383248       3771       4021       3129                 
50434310100000121 BERNE HELEN H FIFTH THIRD BANK TR       840,825.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 03 00 1     352000       3633       3965       3103                 
50434310100000140 ELIAS KENNETH B &        2,461,889.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1986 05 04 00 1     719976       3919       4375       3360                 
50434310100000151 MCCONNELL JAYNE F TRUSTEE MCCONNELL JAYNE F TRUST       903,995.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1965 04 03 00 1      37785       2711       2988       2415                 
50434310100000161 TAPP FRANCES C        2,407,832.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 00 1     356922       3277       3409       2969                 
50434310100000170 BORLAND JOHN J & BORLAND SUZANNE S       2,057,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 04 03 01 1      16143       3483       3815       3140                 
50434310100000180 HENDERSON PETER W JR & HENDERSON BARBARA-JO       2,891,539.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 05 01 2     788859       4018       4469       3523                 
50434310100000190 OCONNOR GERALD J & OCONNOR CAROLYN A       529,061.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 03 00 1     123695       3059       3166       2821                 
50434310100000200 LESLIE REAL ESTATE LTD INC        2,610,159.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 01 1     482720       4128       4412       3730                 
50434310100000211 RESTAINO KAREN        2,225,047.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1970 04 02 00 1     126601       2866       2993       2749                 
50434310100000212 PLOTKIN PETER PLOTKIN PETER TR       1,682,687.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310100000220 WALDMAN AARON E & WALDMAN PATRICIA W       3,653,124.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 04 05 01 2    1528477       4507       4834       4038                 
50434310100000230 GOLDEN MEMOIRS INVESTMENT INC SIRKO C/O       2,731,954.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1991 06 07 00 2     630788       4025       4199       3671                 
50434310100000240 SHEEHAN JANET A        581,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 04 03 01 1     356030       3534       4126       3078                 
50434310100000250 CAPELLA CECILIA        2,101,717.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1970 04 02 00 1       5962       2066       2409       1638                 
50434310100000260 BONNIE D CRISPIN TR        477,125.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 03 00 1      56221       2631       2802       2232                 
50434310100000270 EMMER CURTIS D EMMER SHARI M       1,045,904.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1980 04 03 00 1     403799       4769       5258       4647                 
50434310100000280 DYER MARGARET        1,426,637.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 05 04 01 2     164065       4370       4515       4367                 
50434310100000290 CLARKE MARIA E        515,937.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1970 04 03 00 1      22334       3172       3364       2754                 
50434310100000301 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434310100000310 LEHMAN GAY LEHMAN CHRISTOPHER M       1,479,322.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 04 03 00 1     288305       3659       3925       3111                 
50434310100000320 RAMSING BYRON L JR        2,590,833.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 04 04 00 1     223467       3253       3550       2825                 
50434310100000330 MONTOYA MARSHA E        480,863.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 03 00 1     163240       2891       3080       2507                 
50434310100000340 DEPPEN MARIE P        477,257.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 04 03 00 1      92356       2577       2972       2092                 
50434310100000350 HATFIELD JUDY A        483,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 00 1     210727       2843       2988       2551                 
50434310100000360 GUARINI PATRICK GUARINI LUCILLE       2,296,750.00 0.5051 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 04 02 1    1342915       3829       4369       3358                 
50434310100000380 SORY BAILEY B III &        2,179,392.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 04 05 01 2     538663       3672       3858       3250                 
50434310100000390 JOHNSON M CARL III TR        2,123,347.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1975 04 03 01 2      26048       3609       3852       3154                 
50434310100000400 MACK NORMAN E II & WILLIAM H GURNEY JR       847,274.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 04 03 00 1     230911       3351       3556       3066                 
50434310100000410 EDEN ROCK GLOBAL ASSETS LTD        2,553,506.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 04 03 00 1     446389       3032       3409       2584                 
50434310100000420 MORRISON ANTHONY L & MORRISON INGRID U       2,650,179.00 0.5051 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 04 05 01 2     544088       4701       5057       4289                 
50434310100000440 SANCHEZ J A & SERINA A SANCHEZ SERINA A       564,410.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 04 00 1     184661       3061       3495       2875                 
50434310100000450 BARACK PETER J &        2,105,234.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 04 03 00 1      13859       2990       3194       2573                 
50434310100000460 CONDON CRISTINA B        467,303.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 04 03 00 1      82668       2307       2469       1929                 
50434310100000470 KOEPPEL JOEL P KOEPPEL CAROLE L       1,418,863.00 0.2677 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 03 01 1    1004892       3778       4062       3402                 
50434310100000481 GAZDIK FAMILY ENTERPRISES INC STROMBERG & TARONE C/O       3,195,498.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1970 04 03 01 1      25348       3380       3549       3044                 
50434310110000010 MCCANN DENISE P        677,706.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 04 03 00 1     330537       3237       3387       2967                 
50434310110000020 RHOADES SCOTT A TR & RHOADES DEBORAH C TR       1,771,053.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1992 04 03 00 1      12153       2588       2774       2388                 
50434310110000030 HOFFMAN LINDLEY        533,234.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 03 01 1     257887       3568       3788       3052                 
50434310110000040 SELKOE DENNIS J &        2,385,398.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 04 03 01 1      15296       3301       3473       2999                 
50434310110000050 AGNELLO M H & MILISSA L MILISSA L AGNELLO       422,403.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1970 04 03 00 1     191706       2804       2927       2541                 
50434310110000060 SNYDER ROBERT N        2,055,070.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 2000 04 03 01 1     248483       2836       3050       2397                 
50434310230000010 EICHNER IRA A EICHNER BARBARA R       2,629,746.00 0.869 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1978 05 06 01 2    2031032       7469       8473       6365                 
50434310230000032 ROEDER CONSTANCE J        1,528,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1990 04 03 01 1    1031688       6092       6478       5258                 
50434310230000041 ACQUAVELLA DONNA JO        18,705,897.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1996 05 07 01 2    3230647       8511       9099       7755                 
50434310230000060 MILLARD CRAIG J & MILLARD MICHELE H       9,825,593.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1990 05 07 01 1    1477227       6861       7337       6302                 
50434310230000080 NEWBERGER BERNICE NEWBERGER BERNICE TR       4,311,297.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1972 05 06 01 2    1028436       5775       6103       5314                 
50434310230000090 ALLINSON A EDWARD        3,729,838.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1985 04 05 01 2    2320819       5425       5804       4407                 
50434310230000100 ROSS DARRELL &        5,953,137.00 0.414 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1995 05 06 01 2    2612425       5768       6212       5211                 
50434310240000010 DESETA EDWARD B & DESETA WANDA L       2,558,072.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 2000 03 02 01 1     804983       4579       5180       3928                 
50434310240000020 GERTLER HELEN        561,795.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1980 04 03 00 1     229536       3021       3248       2490                 
50434310240000030 CLYATT SHELTON JR & LINDA L CLYATT LINDA L       612,576.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1977 04 03 01 1     262871       3435       3816       3019                 
50434310240000040 GILBANE MARY        2,380,990.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1995 04 03 01 1     820428       4563       5265       3933                 
50434310240000051 HALL CAROL L        1,670,325.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1992 05 04 01 1     792419       5590       6698       4713                 
50434310240000070 MUNN SUZANNE L        597,137.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1980 04 03 00 1     263807       3470       4140       2800                 
50434310240000080 XCEL TEXAS INC        2,265,916.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1980 04 03 00 1      13666       2959       3289       2481                 
50434310240000090 CLARKE ROSALIND        2,629,343.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1995 04 04 00 1     369441       4140       4347       3725                 
50434310240000100 BENZ JOHN & JOHN & BARBARA BENZ TR HLDR       1,073,442.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1985 05 04 00 1     757981       3876       4481       3276                 
50434310240000110 BENSON JAMES M & BENSON MARLENE J       3,307,724.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 1    1041885       4067       4443       3616                 
50434310240000120 HENNESSEY CHARLE K        1,617,956.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 04 03 01 1     269396       3544       3846       3100                 
50434310240000130 ALFELD MARILYN        3,469,600.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1991 05 04 01 1    1356662       4383       4702       3944                 
50434310240000140 COOK MARK W &        2,378,353.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1980 04 03 01 2      41290       4996       5283       4684                 
50434310240000140 COOK MARK W &        2,378,353.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 02 03 00 1      22104       1780       1912       1723                 
50434310240000160 HASENHUTTL KURT HASENHUTTL MARIA       571,316.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1975 04 03 00 1     239435       3156       3666       2598                 
50434310240000170 SCHNEIDERMAN ARLENE & SCHNEIDERMAN PETER       701,058.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1985 04 03 01 1     352761       3642       4062       3120                 
50434310240000180 FERRAR BEATRICE FERRAR BEATRICE TR       2,659,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1990 05 04 01 2     400166       3851       4382       3305                 
50434310240000190 RICHTER KENNETH P & EVELYN W RICHTER EVELYN W       913,874.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 02 04 01 2     573169       4217       4436       3907                 
50434310240000200 DOUBLE U S INC        2,271,814.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1980 04 03 01 1      14782       3129       3503       2654                 
50434310240000210 ABTAHI MICHAEL        1,835,959.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1980 05 04 01 1     190594       3842       3953       3617                 
50434310240000220 GILLET ELESABETH I ELESABETH I GILLET TR TITL HLDR       3,350,139.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 05 01 1    1083462       4717       5146       4231                 
50434310240000230 LUNTZ IRVING        791,763.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1985 03 03 01 1     417717       3566       3740       3226                 
50434310240000240 208 SANDPIPER DRIVE LLC        2,252,250.00 0 VACANT                           
50434310240000250 AXMAR INVESTMENT CO        2,576,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1980 03 03 01 1     304191       3907       4144       3490                 
50434310240000260 BLEZNAK ALAN D & ALAN D BLEZNAK TR TITL HLDR       1,310,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1985 05 04 01 1     640234       4958       5361       4543                 
50434310240000280 ANN MITCHELL ANDERSON  RESIDUARY TRUST        632,227.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 04 03 01 1     312916       3912       4162       3144                 
50434310240000290 208 SANDPIPER DRIVE LLC        2,563,760.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1975 1975 04 03 01 1     302161       3556       3789       3091                 
50434310240000300 FIGUEROA BARBARA C        1,259,643.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 04 03 01 1     378899       3516       3702       3081                 
50434310240000310 KEENAN SUSAN G        1,883,657.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1991 04 04 01 2     900223       5300       5522       4822                 
50434310240000320 SHERMAN MARC & SHERMAN LAURA       2,128,659.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1985 06 05 01 1     466756       4422       4612       3978                 
50434310240000330 ELIOTT R KEITH        2,073,689.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1995 04 03 01 1     965943       3716       4011       3313                 
50434310240000340 VAN GIESON ROBERT T &        2,135,413.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1995 05 03 01 1     474591       4221       4730       3647                 
50434310240000350 GUBELMANN KATE C &        2,630,627.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1995 05 04 01 2     994668       5574       5999       5087                 
50434310240000370 DRAKE RODMAN L &        1,736,011.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1977 02 01 00 1      22775        270        270        270                 
50434310240000370 DRAKE RODMAN L &        1,736,011.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1980 05 04 01 1     779121       4126       4309       3733                 
50434310240000380 COHEN MAYA        3,503,698.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 2000 04 05 01 1    1277435       4084       4480       3280                 
50434310240000390 HILL MELANIE M        2,204,809.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1980 03 03 01 1     524979       4215       4629       3725                 
50434310240000400 SCHOCH ELAINE        2,342,476.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 2000 05 05 01 1     485177       5085       5714       4431                 
50434310240000420 BALSAMO SALVATORE J        2,490,659.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 03 01 1     228921       3012       3549       2518                 
50434310240000430 TERRY ROBERT W        648,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1975 04 03 00 1     336250       3294       3479       2889                 
50434310240000440 LAMB KEVIN T & LAMB KARYN G       1,756,713.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1985 04 04 01 1      21590       3642       4304       3057                 
50434310240000450 DACA 9 INC        2,550,735.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1980 04 03 01 1     291643       3601       3774       3198                 
50434310240000460 COLHOUN NANCY S COLHOUN NANCY S TR       1,403,398.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1975 03 03 01 1     464625       3630       3867       3145                 
50434310240000470 MARTINEZ ROMAN IV &        2,190,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1995 05 04 01 1    1069093       4403       4626       3965                 
50434310240000480 TAJA REALTY TRUST & C/O PAPPAS PROPERTIES INC       2,252,250.00 0.3019 VACANT                           
50434310240000490 ROPEWALK LLC        2,252,250.00 0.303 VACANT                           
50434310240000520 MINKER MARLYN S MINKER MARLYN S TR       866,360.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1975 05 05 01 1     445672       5214       5555       4713                 
50434310260000010 MORTIMER STANLEY G III        4,985,686.00 0.6882 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2003 05 06 01 2    2318128       5475       5957       5123                 
50434310260000030 FABRIKANT CHARLES FABRIKANT SARA       4,018,686.00 0.6798 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1986 05 04 01 2     471412       4220       4710       3642                 
50434310260000030 FABRIKANT CHARLES FABRIKANT SARA       4,018,686.00 0.6798 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1986 03 03 00 1      87876       1460       1844       1010                 
50434310260000040 PINTO JAMES J & PINTO DALE R W       3,444,234.00 0.4457 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1990 05 05 00 1     541000       4589       5206       4069                 
50434310260000050 WALKER NANCY G        2,159,778.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1985 05 04 01 1     818656       4717       5779       3997                 
50434310260000070 KLORFEIN ELLIOT H & KLORFEIN FRUEMA A       682,112.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1978 04 03 01 1     282013       3622       4364       3002                 
50434310260000080 SMITH HAROLD SMITH ANNE B       736,677.00 0.3441 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1977 04 03 01 1     326260       3770       4272       3252                 
50434310280000010 RUDIN RACHEL        6,334,262.00 0.83 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 09 01 1    3590656      11468      19834      10604                 
50434310280000020 HAMM WILLIAM H 1987 TRUST HAMM WILLIAM H III TR       11,250,344.00 0.78 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 05 00 1    4892446       9495      10725       8468                 
50434310280000030 LUXWOOD ENTERPRISES LTD        6,304,334.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 05 00 1    2199068       9102       9747       8157                 
50434310280000040 LUXWOOD ENTERPRISES LTD        4,075,500.00 0.52 VACANT                           
50434310280000050 MARKS SALLY M        5,108,433.00 0.78 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 05 00 1    1911345       7586       8746       6586                 
50434310280010000 PALAMA ESTATES HMOWNERS ASSN MADDOCK COMPANIES C/O       0.00 0.08 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434310320000010 DAVIE DIANA W        1,820,577.00 0.38 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 04 01 1    1947383       5192       5413       4834                 
50434310320000020 LIBERT JEFFREY A & BROWN MARTHA D       4,390,856.00 0.38 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 04 00 1    1791451       4776       4997       4418                 
50434310320000030 SIEGEL HERBERT J & PHYLLIS M SIEGEL       3,168,068.00 0.38 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 1    1904989       5420       6379       4752                 
50434310320000041 YEAGER WELDON O TR        1,830,929.00 0.346 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 1     792067       4678       5004       4168                 
50434310320000042 COOLEY WILLIAM O & COOLEY JUDITH T       5,206,737.00 0.6721 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 03 2    3121400       6658       8322       5170                 
50434310320010000 WINDSOR PALM BEACH EST HMOWNRS ASSOCIATION INC       0.00 0.4744 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434310320050000 ATLANTIC FUNDING LTD        0.00 0.0139 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434310360000011 MADDOCK PAUL L JR         0.6527 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434310360000012 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.0344 VACANT                           
50434310360000020 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.675 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434310360000031 MADDOCK PAUL L JR & KEMBLE CECILIA LACOSTE        0.4989 VACANT                           
50434310360000032 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.5577 VACANT                           
50434310360000040 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.8871 VACANT                           
50434310360000051 MADDOCK PAUL L JR         0.1811 VACANT                           
50434310360000052 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.4061 VACANT                           
50434310360000060 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.6161 VACANT                           
50434310360010000 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.0371 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434310360020000 MADDOCK PAUL L MARITAL TRUST BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRUSTEE        0.0369 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434311000020010 TRUST MARTIN & TRUST DIANE       26,178,517.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 01 00 1     150927       1949       2271       1196                 
50434311000020010 TRUST MARTIN & TRUST DIANE       26,178,517.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 11 01 2    5958411      32137      36823      18673                 
50434311000020020 VECELLIO LEO A JR & VECELLIO KATHRYN C       29,756,685.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 06 07 00 2    7799406      22091      25041      19845                 
50434311000020030 DE WITZ NINA N        847,416.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 04 03 01 1      15935       3194       3430       2512                 
50434311000020040 702 ASSOCIATES LLC        24,251,423.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1996 05 10 00 2    2659676      15408      27520      10404                 
50434311000020040 702 ASSOCIATES LLC        24,251,423.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1999 02 01 00 1     155875       1382       1594        888                 
50434311000020060 DE BRAGANCA MIGUEL & ANN DE BRAGANCA ANN       497,162.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1975 04 03 00 1     226080       2688       2808       2408                 
50434311000020070 PELTZ NELSON PELTZ CLAUDIA L       68,220,801.00 7.4441 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 2005 01 01 00 1     180380       1950       2126       1572                 
50434311000020070 PELTZ NELSON PELTZ CLAUDIA L       68,220,801.00 7.4441 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1975 05 16 00 2.5    8386540      36664      45166      25289                 
50434311000020080 PELTZ NELSON PELTZ CLAUDIA L       9,840,674.00 1.8873 VACANT 1991 1991 00 06 00 1    2218959      15126      18433      10621                 
50434311010000031 BEACH CLUB INC        7,500,000.00 3.0778 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1970 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    3530920      55696         
50434311010000031 BEACH CLUB INC        7,500,000.00 3.0778 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1971 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     147830       7043         
50434311010000032 MARDER GARY L MARDER CAREN       4,184,860.00 1.5526 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 05 04 01 2      16809       4468       5148       4037                 
50434311010000032 MARDER GARY L MARDER CAREN       4,184,860.00 1.5526 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 04 03 01 2      12132       3104       3531       2764                 
50434311010000032 MARDER GARY L MARDER CAREN       4,184,860.00 1.5526 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1970 04 03 01 1      14269       3804       3991       3448                 
50434311020000040 POISSON ARTHUR J        675,915.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1975 04 03 01 2     269230       3693       4089       2794                 
50434311020000051 CHAMANDY H GREG & CHAMANDY CHANTAL       1,742,250.00 0.278 VACANT                           
50434311020000052 CHAMANDY H GREG & CHAMANDY CHANTAL       6,303,150.00 0.5037 VACANT                           
50434311020000061 RADTKE JANINA        5,252,625.00 0.3993 VACANT                           
50434314000010060 NOBLE CRISTINA DE HEEREN        17,637,886.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1923 00 01 00 1      41879        845       1056        528                 
50434314000010060 NOBLE CRISTINA DE HEEREN        17,637,886.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1985 00 12 00 4    2328431      11611      12483      10546                 
50434314000010070 KELLOGG CHRISTOPHER G        1,016,093.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1937 00 03 01 2      12465       2995       3095       2888                 
50434314000010080 123 LLC        22,313,757.00 2.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1950 00 14 00 4     602907      18289      18936      18500                 
50434314000020010 MASCHMEYER DEBORAH C & MASCHMEYER TROY W JR       7,539,646.00 0.9691 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 03 2    1903630       7281       8432       6637                 
50434314000020020 BLUE DAVID S TR & BLUE CONSTANCE L &       4,140,000.00 0.5429 VACANT                           
50434314000020030 MCHENRY WILLIAM F & SHEILA C MC HENRY SHEILA C       210,001.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 01 01 00 1      12708        219        243        243                 
50434314000020030 MCHENRY WILLIAM F & SHEILA C MC HENRY SHEILA C       210,001.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 03 03 00 2     184934       2001       2590       1854                 
50434314000020041 ROOT TRAIL PARTNERS LLC        72,136.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314000020050 VITALE ALBERTO & VITALE GIOIETTA       4,153,896.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1990 05 05 00 2    1055484       6968       7493       6351                 
50434314000020060 SADECA REALTY LLC        1,056,199.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1965 00 03 01 1     135131       2037       2157       2007                 
50434314000020080 SCHWARTZ ROBERT S & SCHWARTZ BRUCE A &       8,071,616.00 0.96 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1990 05 10 00 2    2301399       8954      10618       8115                 
50434314000020090 HOUSE OF CANTERBURY INC        22,184,197.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1995 05 08 01 2    2724953      11544      13864       9839                 
50434314000020090 HOUSE OF CANTERBURY INC        22,184,197.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 02 02 01 2     531426       2756       2888       2700                 
50434314000020110 WOLPIN WALTER & WOLPIN MARILYN       4,053,750.00 0.536 VACANT                           
50434314010000010 ROSS GEORGE & ROSS FAMILY RESIDENCE TRUST       7,172,258.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 07 00 2    1863938       7786       9302       6756                 
50434314010000011 BIERLY L E JR &        3,522,998.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1980 05 04 01 2     287062       5305       6341       4484                 
50434314010000030 FRANCO JOHN R JR & RENATE A RENATE A FRANCO       1,630,765.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1985 00 04 01 1     593493       4561       5018       4050                 
50434314010000040 OELBAUM HAROLD & OELBAUM NANCY       2,397,737.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 03 04 01 1    1197570       7051       8194       6398                 
50434314010000050 HILL ISABELLE        670,801.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1970 00 03 01 1     293114       3539       3851       3023                 
50434314010000060 KAMENSTEIN DAVID &        2,612,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 00 04 01 1     536140       4428       4725       3903                 
50434314010000070 DEDEO ESTHER E        3,378,254.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 05 01 2    1630213       5689       6176       5217                 
50434314010000080 NOEL WALTER M JR &        4,360,868.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 03 04 01 1     919593       4612       4871       4186                 
50434314010000090 DAYTON W ALAN & JOANNE M DAYTON JOANNE M       1,015,680.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1975 00 04 01 2     385485       4911       5410       4727                 
50434314010000090 DAYTON W ALAN & JOANNE M DAYTON JOANNE M       1,015,680.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1978 00 01 00 1      55049        534        534        534                 
50434314010000100 DEAN PATRICIA B        3,347,910.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 04 01 1    1632554       5187       5973       4567                 
50434314010000110 HIMMEL CHARLOTTE S HIMMEL CHARLOTTE S TR       691,342.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 03 03 00 1      65392       4014       4445       3818                 
50434314010000120 GREEN R & ELIZABETH F GREEN ELIZABETH F       962,739.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1965 00 04 01 1     350072       4843       5404       4326                 
50434314010000130 LARMOYEUX CHRISTOPHER M & LARMOYEUX LEIGH T       4,282,995.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 05 07 01 2    2564575       6425       7247       5870                 
50434314010000140 RADTKE JANINA TR        5,554,751.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 06 07 01 2    2010145       6449       7266       5864                 
50434314010000150 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.86 MUNICIPAL                           
50434314010000190 ROOSEVELT AVA F ROOSEVELT AVA F TR       1,751,035.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 03 01 1    1427065       4611       5404       4077                 
50434314010000200 WILLINGER HARDING W & WILLINGER JANICE K       3,522,076.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 06 00 1    1123091       6214       6869       5438                 
50434314010000211 ZENKO JERE S & ZENKO JOHN A       5,105,574.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 05 00 1    2310183       9090      10528       8785                 
50434314010000230 BOUTELL ANN H        2,002,450.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 04 00 1    1707831       4994       5441       4473                 
50434314010000241 PARSONS LOUISE P        1,112,297.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1955 00 03 01 2     416980       5362       6062       4001                 
50434314010000242 HAWKINS WILLIAM J        2,681,250.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314010000260 WOERNER LESTER J        5,522,934.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1998 05 05 01 2    2082388       6589       7255       5998                 
50434314010000270 254 TANGIER LLC CLAREMONT COMPANIES C/O       5,684,250.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314010000290 BUCCINI BERNADETTE D & BERNADETTE D BUCCINI TR TITL HLDR       5,257,279.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 06 01 2    2177399       6664       6922       6239                 
50434314010000300 PITT PAULINE B PAULINE B PITT ET AL TR HLDRS       6,328,876.00 1.4393 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1985 00 09 00 2     552805       9405      10662       8402                 
50434314020000011 SWANSON DAN E & SWANSON KAREN W       1,461,704.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 00 02 00 1      21152       1728       1849       1476                 
50434314020000012 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.2101 MUNICIPAL                           
50434314020000020 MONFORTE VERA A        817,652.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 04 01 1     468267       3482       3662       3161                 
50434314020000030 ELLIOTT NEIL & KATHLEEN KATHLEEN ELLIOTT       730,164.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 03 03 00 1     170876       3340       3542       3090                 
50434314020000040 RYAN ALLAN A IV & MARIA C RYAN MARIA C       940,587.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 2000 00 04 00 2    1000045       4815       5229       4493                 
50434314020000050 BARNHART F GREGORY & SUSAN L BARNHART SUSAN L       783,520.00 0.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 03 05 00 2     602207       5429       6094       5029                 
50434314020000060 BOYLES KEVAN K & COONEY ROSEMARY       506,036.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1985 00 03 00 1     419518       3731       3910       3354                 
50434314020000070 SIRIGOTIS JAMES D &        920,848.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 03 00 1     744119       3856       4061       3445                 
50434314020000080 MADSEN BARBARA H MADSEN BARBARA H TR       847,099.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 05 04 00 2     337324       4840       5628       4264                 
50434314020000090 KEAN INVESTMENTS INC        1,440,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314020000100 COONEY JOHN F & GAIL E COONEY GAIL E       862,128.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 00 04 01 2     403655       4490       5132       3792                 
50434314030000010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.33 MUNICIPAL                           
50434314030000030 ROBINSON MARYANNE        1,001,984.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1957 00 02 00 2      41984       2289       2608       2008                 
50434314030000040 LEVENSON KERRY A        599,111.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1957 00 01 00 1      65156       1701       1718       1694                 
50434314030000050 CHAMP JOSEPH H II & GRACE M GRACE M CHAMP       1,210,551.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 04 00 1     800403       4059       4209       3709                 
50434314030000070 MORAN J BRIAN & MORAN CYNTHIA B       2,363,419.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 03 05 00 1     911171       4288       4972       3811                 
50434314030000090 RACKOFF BARBARA        2,261,211.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 1     806142       4145       4366       3694                 
50434314030000110 LOCKER NANCY TR        1,075,658.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1952 00 01 00 1      35470        816        944        517                 
50434314030000110 LOCKER NANCY TR        1,075,658.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 00 01 00 1      79288       1179       1287       1133                 
50434314030000120 LOCKER ALAN N TR        1,819,709.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1995 04 04 01 1     366683       3207       3559       2779                 
50434314030000140 DAMATO PHILIP & MARGARET        1,633,969.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 00 03 00 1     186159       2780       2872       2564                 
50434314030000160 DIAMOND ANNA EST        2,301,199.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 00 02 00 1     140794       2631       2852       2155                 
50434314030000190 WATCHMAN W S & MARY L TRS WATCHMAN MARY L       875,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1992 00 03 01 2     512829       4332       4691       4122                 
50434314030000190 WATCHMAN W S & MARY L TRS WATCHMAN MARY L       875,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 00 01 00 1      28753        428        474        360                 
50434314040000011 MACK PHYLLIS & MACK WILLIAM       25,242,960.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 06 06 02 2    7130543      17370      19911      15473                 
50434314040000013 JAFFE ELLEN S NAUGHTON AMY B TR       17,109,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 05 06 02 2    3783719      10566      11843       8559                 
50434314040000021 MERGENS ANN A MERGENS LOUGHRAN ANN A TR       2,678,638.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1967 00 05 01 2     528112       6425       7635       5555                 
50434314040000022 CURRAN MARY E        2,824,985.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 05 05 01 1     616919       5807       6098       5282                 
50434314040000023 HAMMOND DANA AMES        11,321,035.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    2052785       7588       8156       6854                 
50434314040000024 MADOFF RUTH        9,395,779.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1990 05 07 00 2     768574       7426       8753       6475                 
50434314050000010 CRANE MARY S TR        494,028.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 00 03 01 1     214733       2524       2787       2211                 
50434314050000021 ROSS CAROLYN H        461,754.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 00 03 00 1     114832       2783       3078       2470                 
50434314050000022 KINO DONALD E JR        1,623,962.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 00 1     862635       3224       3365       2935                 
50434314050000030 PRESSLY DAVID S & MARY G PRESSLY MARY G       483,166.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1990 04 04 01 2     308289       3114       3544       2732                 
50434314050000050 PICOTTE MICHAEL B & PICOTTE MARGARET L       3,429,291.00 0.482 SINGLE FAMILY 1941 1997 05 07 00 2    1637312       6434       7061       5872                 
50434314050000050 PICOTTE MICHAEL B & PICOTTE MARGARET L       3,429,291.00 0.482 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 01 01 00 1      46759        331        631          1                 
50434314050000060 HABICHT FRANK H & JEANNE P HABICHT JEANNE P       584,902.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 00 03 01 2     378193       3758       4116       3299                 
50434314050000080 BERNSTEIN RICHARD S        1,538,610.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1980 05 06 01 2     588800       5228       5352       5175                 
50434314050000091 FOLEY MARY B        353,732.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 00 03 00 1      55144       2091       2190       1891                 
50434314050000092 DARE AMOS &        1,944,126.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1990 03 03 01 1      13626       2796       2998       2510                 
50434314050000120 PALMER JAMES A        1,509,619.00 0.22 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1985 00 03 01 2     767723       3622       4156       3283                 
50434314050000131 KNOWLES PETER I C II & KNOWLES BRANTLEY B       1,967,224.00 0.2273 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 03 03 00 1     240806       2834       2854       2826                 
50434314050000140 SMITH JEFFERY W & SMITH NANCY       1,073,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 00 05 00 2     826560       5195       5741       4809                 
50434314050000150 LORENTZEN MATTHEW B        1,643,375.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 04 04 01 2     790732       4056       4634       3440                 
50434314050000160 MCCOURT DAVID        1,456,749.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 00 03 00 1     223599       2443       2585       2219                 
50434314050000170 FLINT AMBER K & FLINT DAVID B       3,026,635.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 04 04 00 2    1500871       4372       4715       3948                 
50434314050000180 COOPER JEHU P & PATRICIA P COOPER PATRICIA P       779,137.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1980 00 04 01 2     709701       4920       5543       4419                 
50434314050000191 WOLFE PETER A & WOLFE MAURY R       1,179,924.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1975 00 03 01 2     379761       3609       3960       2729                 
50434314050000192 YOUNG DONALD A WALKER & YOUNG NEELY A       2,266,836.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 00 03 00 1      14586       3147       3464       2827                 
50434314050000200 JACOBSON ROBERT J        596,290.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 00 04 01 1     278197       3273       3535       2963                 
50434314050000221 ROBINSON JUDITH K ROBINSON JUDITH K       1,971,170.00 0.2957 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 00 03 01 2     367823       4244       4417       3881                 
50434314050000230 MATTHEWS WILLIAM M        4,043,351.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 05 09 00 2    2324859       8729       9618       7951                 
50434314050000240 ROSENWALD E J JR & PATRICIA P        12,108,159.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1975 00 05 01 2    1108341       5452       6573       4296                 
50434314060000010 FORD KATHLEEN DUROSS CHOPIN L FRANK TR       23,147,107.00 1.5855 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 02 02 00 1    3476612       8546       9891       8386                 
50434314060000010 FORD KATHLEEN DUROSS CHOPIN L FRANK TR       23,147,107.00 1.5855 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 10 07 05 2    4866551      11078      12461       9536                 
50434314060000042 EISENBERG FRANCES EISENBERG FRANCES TR       7,479,504.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1998 05 07 00 2    2058654       7035       7715       6420                 
50434314060000043 LEVINE ARTHUR & LEVINE ARLENE       3,627,939.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1990 00 05 01 2    1634992       5723       6191       4630                 
50434314060000044 EISENBERG FRANCES TRUST EISENBERG FRANCES TR       432,432.00 0.06 VACANT                           
50434314060000070 FANJUL ALFONSO FLORIDA CRYSTALS CORP C/O       20,897,898.00 1.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 00 08 01 1.5    2063752      10775      11993       9571                 
50434314060000090 SHULMAN ALAN L        2,052,744.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1941 1985 05 06 01 2    1242589       5891       6411       5178                 
50434314060000100 MENDEL NANCY W        759,754.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1975 00 03 01 1     340235       3546       3955       2963                 
50434314060000110 CARUSO EDNA L        1,158,632.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1995 05 05 01 2     707108       5630       5860       5231                 
50434314060000120 PROTELL SALLY L PROTELL SALLY L TR       1,646,463.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1981 00 01 00 1     173422       1159       1394        704                 
50434314060000120 PROTELL SALLY L PROTELL SALLY L TR       1,646,463.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1981 00 03 00 1     293850       2296       2404       2297                 
50434314060000130 KIRKLAND LILA W        1,716,116.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1990 00 03 00 1    1012109       5263       6041       4619                 
50434314060000140 SCHELLER ZBIGNIEW        4,305,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    2507910       6229       6965       5752                 
50434314060000150 LIPPMAN JUDITH S &        767,432.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 00 04 00 1     295086       3474       3730       3206                 
50434314060000160 GLUMAX LP        3,736,829.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1999 00 03 01 1    1423511       4361       4533       3961                 
50434314060000170 MCCLOSKEY M P & MCCLOSKEY BARBARA       1,344,080.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 00 04 00 1      20732       4321       4472       3968                 
50434314060000181 RIDGWAY JANE A        855,435.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1967 00 04 01 1     274795       4786       4901       4537                 
50434314060000200 SIEGFRIED STEVEN & SIEGFRIED LINDA       2,776,532.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 00 04 00 2     540730       4484       4964       4174                 
50434314060000210 MEIGHER GRACE T MEIGHER S CHRISTOPHER III       1,396,039.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 2000 02 03 00 1     382476       3791       4125       3367                 
50434314060000220 LOWNDES SYDNEY M        931,541.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 00 04 00 1     415989       3989       4151       3630                 
50434314060000230 ROLLHAUS BARBARA W        2,418,359.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1990 03 04 01 1     521207       3980       4165       3613                 
50434314060000240 STERNE ELEANOR M        2,986,240.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 00 06 01 2     818551       4656       4919       4268                 
50434314060000250 WALDIN ERIK T        3,268,511.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1981 00 03 01 1     676421       4399       4853       4040                 
50434314060000260 245 CORAL LANE LLC        635,497.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 00 04 00 1       4289       3071       3242       2792                 
50434314060000271 RAMSING ANNETTE R        2,290,436.00 0.7201 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1980 00 09 00 1    2324941      12936      13834      11653                 
50434314060000272 ROA ZOE E TRUST        4,363,375.00 0.3136 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 05 06 01 1    1824760       5106       5391       4720                 
50434314060000281 BRANT RYAN        2,520,375.00 0.3128 VACANT                           
50434314060000290 AVELLINO FRANK J &        4,496,095.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 06 02 2    1992283       5379       5797       4899                 
50434314060000300 RAYNER WILLIAM P & RAYNER KATHARINE J       5,456,094.00 0.6087 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1990 00 04 01 1     591537       3318       3641       3024                 
50434314060000310 GEORGE DONNA L        2,409,551.00 0.58 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1990 00 04 00 1     854834       6463       6972       6049                 
50434314060000310 GEORGE DONNA L        2,409,551.00 0.58 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1990 00 03 01 1     139126       1678       1678       1678                 
50434314060000330 KRAKOFF SANDRA G        3,923,489.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 06 02 1    2220431       6131       6758       5719                 
50434314060000340 210 EMERALD LANE LLC        3,152,762.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1988 00 03 01 2     721447       3396       3632       2669                 
50434314060000360 STOLL LORI A        2,595,740.00 0.42 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 10 00 2    2167658       7310       8138       6772                 
50434314060000390 ANBINDER STEPHEN E &        4,610,188.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 2000 05 06 01 2    2009044       5247       5967       4844                 
50434314060000400 MCLEARY JOSEPH W & JOYCE C JOYCE C MC LEARY       1,242,217.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 00 04 00 2     726717       4264       4759       3546                 
50434314060000410 STEPHAICH LOUISE H        1,344,945.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1985 05 07 01 2     845003       5992       6753       5316                 
50434314060000422 SCHNALL M ELLIOT        803,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 00 04 01 2     524843       4740       5078       4440                 
50434314060000441 MALLORY T DOWNS & BARBARA B        3,829,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 00 05 01 2     176247       6604       7233       6131                 
50434314060000460 CROSS ISLAND LLC        2,950,127.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 2001 00 03 00 1     354168       3094       3407       2599                 
50434314060000470 CLUETT HELEN S        684,681.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 00 04 01 2     273798       4386       4610       4015                 
50434314060000480 LORBER STANLEY LORBER DOROTHEA A       788,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 03 04 01 1     282218       4137       4611       3645                 
50434314060000490 WOOLEMS JAMES WOOLEMS ELEANOR C       2,572,469.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 00 03 00 1     148487       2444       2637       2396                 
50434314060000501 GOLDING HARRIET        1,034,208.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1985 00 04 01 2     642522       4750       5032       4318                 
50434314060000502 DE MARCELLUS JULIETTE        429,064.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 00 03 01 2      12711       3202       3935       2927                 
50434314060000520 LANE BRUCE & LANE LESLIE       5,111,990.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 00 00 00 2    2436585       5585       6643       5059                 
50434314060000530 ANGUS WILLIAM M        977,917.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 00 03 00 1     266485       3141       3434       2713                 
50434314060000540 SILVER EDWARD S TR        2,661,430.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 03 03 00 1     191676       2367       2682       2090                 
50434314060000550 SCHRAFFT JUDITH W        374,080.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1955 00 03 01 1      93859       2394       2416       2384                 
50434314070000190 HARRIS J IRA & HARRIS NICKI       9,181,450.00 1.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 2000 05 07 01 2    2789997      12274      13407      11205                 
50434314070000190 HARRIS J IRA & HARRIS NICKI       9,181,450.00 1.5 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     591797       3224       3224       3224                 
50434314070000210 WYSER PRATTE HEATHER        895,025.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1945 00 04 00 2     200677       3485       3789       3375                 
50434314070000220 BORCHARDT ROBERT L        4,164,390.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1960 01 01 00 2       3553        955       1148        504                 
50434314070000220 BORCHARDT ROBERT L        4,164,390.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1990 04 05 00 2      66239       5371       5543       5297                 
50434314070000220 BORCHARDT ROBERT L        4,164,390.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 01 01 00 1       2281        525        700        450                 
50434314070000230 GENERAL TRADING CO INC GEORGE ABAD C/O       4,380,123.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 04 04 01 1     349412       4128       4320       3680                 
50434314070000240 MAXBERRY LIMITED        5,499,549.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 04 06 00 2    1430242       6733       7460       5988                 
50434314070000250 KENNA ROBERT V        7,354,692.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 07 01 2    3281041       6983       7984       6142                 
50434314070000260 TRAULSEN REGINE        4,025,684.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 04 07 01 1    1153974       5386       5788       4739                 
50434314070000270 LEVITON ELSIE G LEVITON ELSIE G TR       787,971.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1960 00 03 00 1      64321       3068       3235       3011                 
50434314070000280 LEVIN ROSANA VEGOSEN DEAN TR       1,895,146.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 2000 00 04 00 1     767738       5023       6058       4058                 
50434314070000290 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.3527 MUNICIPAL           1926 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     857570      10366         
50434314070000300 ROONEY TIMOTHY J & JUNE M ROONEY JUNE M       2,317,462.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1950 00 01 00 1      72205       1030       1232        560                 
50434314070000300 ROONEY TIMOTHY J & JUNE M ROONEY JUNE M       2,317,462.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 00 06 00 2    1207168       5863       6664       5099                 
50434314070000320 GUEST WINSTON & HELEN GUEST WINSTON       1,122,083.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1929 00 02 00 2      66175       1663       2052       1242                 
50434314070000320 GUEST WINSTON & HELEN GUEST WINSTON       1,122,083.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1990 00 06 01 3     378008       7491       8501       6924                 
50434314070000361 WEISFISCH RAMI YORAM & WEISFISCH PNINA APOLONIA       3,827,779.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 00 07 00 2    1811833      12774      14268      11596                 
50434314070000371 RUBINOFF MICHAEL S        11,039,920.00 0.9326 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 06 01 2    3199649       7646       8705       6766                 
50434314070000372 WOHL BENJAMIN & WOHL ELYS       1,876,194.00 0.3283 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 05 05 01 2.5     751732       9450       9862       8514                 
50434314070000380 EBERHARDT JOHN        1,931,774.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1935 00 01 00 1      56723       1145       1360        644                 
50434314070000380 EBERHARDT JOHN        1,931,774.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1945 04 07 00 2     753805       9444      10977       8384                 
50434314070000400 SCAASI ARNOLD REV TR AGREEMENT SCAASI ARNOLD TR       4,501,043.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 00 03 01 2     366266       4064       4319       3691                 
50434314070000400 SCAASI ARNOLD REV TR AGREEMENT SCAASI ARNOLD TR       4,501,043.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 02 02 00 1      98428        980       1018        964                 
50434314070000410 HOLZER JANE B        4,531,462.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1965 05 08 01 1     495079       6056       6334       5697                 
50434314070000420 RICHTER STEFAN B & NANCY R NANCY R RICHTER       1,120,860.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 00 03 01 2     664467       6287       6939       5781                 
50434314070000430 167 DUNBAR ROAD LLC        843,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1945 00 04 01 2     311899       4720       5200       3622                 
50434314070000440 TRUCKS CLAUDE H TRUCKS MELINDA W       1,621,148.00 0.3764 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1995 05 06 01 1.5     439392       4984       5581       4565                 
50434314070000450 CATH NANCY J CATH NANCY J TR       451,296.00 0.3972 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1960 00 03 00 1      49063       3461       3817       3044                 
50434314070000460 RAYFIELD H E        3,622,681.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 2000 00 03 01 2    1246925       6876       8371       5962                 
50434314070000471 GOODSTEIN PATRICIA        3,374,406.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1995 00 04 01 2    1134587       5322       5595       5070                 
50434314070000472 SCHARF MICHAEL &        7,713,105.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    3582204       9156       9611       8684                 
50434314070000490 COOK CYNTHIA E & COOK BRYSON L       5,380,911.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 2000 00 01 00 2     118569       1338       1500        960                 
50434314070000490 COOK CYNTHIA E & COOK BRYSON L       5,380,911.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 2000 00 05 01 2    2350142       6074       6630       5730                 
50434314070000500 BRANT PETER M & STEPHANIE S        5,870,680.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1915 1989 03 04 01 2    1653060       5026       5471       4835                 
50434314070000500 BRANT PETER M & STEPHANIE S        5,870,680.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1989 01 02 00 2     168384       2508       2900       2340                 
50434314070000510 ROSSBACH JAY H & LINDA ROSSBACH LINDA       974,392.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 00 04 01 1     325877       4024       4833       3536                 
50434314070000520 MORAN BRIDGET R & MORAN TIMOTHY       1,723,629.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1985 03 04 01 2     356156       5502       6007       5054                 
50434314070000530 RICCA C BROOKS JR & SALLY S RICCA SALLY S       1,197,370.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 03 04 00 2     523597       4654       5236       4218                 
50434314070000580 PHILLIPS GEORGE W & PHILLIPS VIRGINIA W       903,261.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 00 04 01 1     307196       3891       4093       3421                 
50434314070000590 LANDRY DANA E & MOODY WILLIAM F X       5,131,850.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1970 00 02 00 1      98017       1346       1584        792                 
50434314070000590 LANDRY DANA E & MOODY WILLIAM F X       5,131,850.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1980 00 04 01 2     882170       4962       5497       4773                 
50434314070000590 LANDRY DANA E & MOODY WILLIAM F X       5,131,850.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 00 01 00 1      26270        330        352        320                 
50434314070000601 MORRIS JOHN H & MORRIS ETSUKO O       2,794,043.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1991 00 01 00 1     105310       1137       1390        600                 
50434314070000601 MORRIS JOHN H & MORRIS ETSUKO O       2,794,043.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1991 00 03 01 2    1670832       5091       5326       4996                 
50434314070000620 HOPE MARGARET L        954,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1960 00 01 00 1      50599        571        744        313                 
50434314070000620 HOPE MARGARET L        954,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 00 03 00 2     326442       3305       3417       3237                 
50434314070000630 PUCILLO MICHAEL J & DEBORAH D DEBORAH D PUCILLO       1,493,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 04 00 2     884820       6403       7179       5660                 
50434314070000640 DREAMLIFE CORP        5,203,971.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 04 01 1    1151301       5312       5495       4956                 
50434314070000650 DUKCEVICH VLADO R        5,055,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1930 00 01 00 1      58751       1328       1562        781                 
50434314070000650 DUKCEVICH VLADO R        5,055,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 00 04 01 2     958575       4536       4550       4530                 
50434314070000660 JACQUE FORD JEANNE MARIE TRUST JACQUE FORD JEANNE MARIE TR       6,173,019.00 0.445 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 06 06 02 2    2518223       6932       7279       6439                 
50434314070000671 BUTLER VERONICA B        1,271,446.00 0.27 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1965 00 03 00 2     250060       3362       4105       2847                 
50434314070000672 R W REAL ESTATE LLC        2,926,212.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 00 04 00 2     603324       4333       4756       3977                 
50434314070000681 ROCHELLE THOMAS ALFREDA E        1,030,024.00 0.08 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 03 01 1     483414       3517       3923       3054                 
50434314070000682 HARVEY ROBERT D HARVEY LUCIA T       527,085.00 0.3673 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1965 00 03 00 1     184641       2609       2817       2232                 
50434314070000690 JOHNSTON JAY A & JOHNSTON KIRSTEN       4,658,716.00 0 VACANT 1928 1929 00 01 00 2      58716       1204       1588        400                 
50434314070000700 150 DUNBAR ROAD INC        5,707,722.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 02 2    1645817       6705       7692       5732                 
50434314070000710 KALISMAN MICHAEL & GAYLE KALISMAN GAYLE       2,417,831.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 00 01 00 2      73262        847        997        497                 
50434314070000710 KALISMAN MICHAEL & GAYLE KALISMAN GAYLE       2,417,831.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 00 03 01 2    1803966       5718       5818       5718                 
50434314070000710 KALISMAN MICHAEL & GAYLE KALISMAN GAYLE       2,417,831.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 02 00 2      98343        936       1277        339                 
50434314070000720 KRUMHOLZ STEVEN & DANA R KRUMHOLZ DANA R       1,928,764.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1980 00 02 00 1     107913       1351       1496       1012                 
50434314070000720 KRUMHOLZ STEVEN & DANA R KRUMHOLZ DANA R       1,928,764.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1980 05 06 00 3    1265383       6672       6771       6633                 
50434314070000730 BREKUS GORDON & TRUDY BREKUS TRUDY       1,114,036.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1980 00 03 01 2     507450       5397       6348       4846                 
50434314070000740 KINZELBERG HARVEY KINZELBERG HARVEY TR       11,437,864.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1999 05 08 01 2    4259442      10678      10846      10678                 
50434314070000740 KINZELBERG HARVEY KINZELBERG HARVEY TR       11,437,864.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 00 01 00 1     200959       1765       2535        504                 
50434314080000021 GOSSETT W TED & ABEE ROBERT M       6,878,213.00 0.59 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 05 01 5    2259418       7061       7473       6714                 
50434314080000022 BEYER MICHELE L HUNTINGTON TRUST TR       3,946,854.00 0.59 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 2000 00 04 01 4    2139746       7111       7384       6832                 
50434314080000040 BOTTORFF DENNIS C & BOTTORFF JEAN B       6,016,118.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1990 03 03 01 2    1102651       5166       5953       4512                 
50434314080000051 486426 ONTARIO LIMITED        9,495,921.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 00 06 01 2    1330375       8286      11864       6208                 
50434314080000051 486426 ONTARIO LIMITED        9,495,921.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 02 00 1     103981        940       1300        786                 
50434314080000052 GUEST WINSTON & BESSEMER TR CO NA/ J SANTOS C/O       3,466,074.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314080000053 110 WELLS ROAD LLC        1,089,541.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 00 05 00 2     589432       4955       5702       4343                 
50434314090000050 BONER CLIVE & DEBORAH DEBORAH BONER       829,797.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1990 00 03 01 2     513178       3537       3711       3211                 
50434314090000070 ORAT, LLC        3,109,297.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 03 00 1     932680       3407       3527       3127                 
50434314090000090 DUC NHU HOLDINGS INC        1,165,991.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1985 00 03 01 2     160519       2204       2373       2150                 
50434314090000090 DUC NHU HOLDINGS INC        1,165,991.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1995 00 01 00 1      36051        467        525        435                 
50434314090000100 SANDELL CORP ZIELINSKI & BOYD C/O       6,405,209.00 0.78 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1979 00 03 01 1     124354       3273       3801       2759                 
50434314090000100 SANDELL CORP ZIELINSKI & BOYD C/O       6,405,209.00 0.78 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1983 00 02 00 1     111732       1522       1598       1345                 
50434314090000161 ROGERS DOUGLAS E & ROGERS COLLEEN M       3,312,831.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 05 01 2    1365741       5879       6770       5266                 
50434314090000190 CLOUTIER GEORGE A        5,099,729.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 05 06 00 2    2119794       6198       7630       5410                 
50434314090000280 GELFAND MICHAEL C & EDITH M GELFAND EDITH M       1,167,113.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 03 01 2    1104637       4867       5393       4390                 
50434314090000300 JOHNSON THEODORE M        715,638.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1985 00 03 00 1     386619       2558       2976       2075                 
50434314090000311 TOWANDA INVESTMENTS INC        2,839,430.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 03 01 1     641639       3733       4137       3246                 
50434314090000340 ANLYAN ALEXANDRA H WILLIAM ANLYAN TR TITL HLDR       1,602,561.00 0.2292 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 04 00 2     168483       1838       2046       1658                 
50434314090000340 ANLYAN ALEXANDRA H WILLIAM ANLYAN TR TITL HLDR       1,602,561.00 0.2292 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1975 03 03 00 2     154955       2191       2551       2086                 
50434314090000360 MILLER BRADFORD P MILLER PAMELA M       956,883.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 04 00 2     440550       4132       4495       3400                 
50434314090000380 PELLITIERI PAUL R & PAUL R & VIRGINIA M PELLITIERI TR AGRM'T       1,533,698.00 0.3094 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 06 01 2     815521       4947       6504       4227                 
50434314100010020 RUSSECK HOWARD & RUSSECK LANA       3,843,554.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 06 01 2    1396142       4532       4908       4131                 
50434314100010040 WEATHER VANE PROPERTIES LLC        2,491,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 00 02 00 1      73648       2163       2619       1756                 
50434314100010051 GUYOTT LOUIS E II        880,480.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1980 00 03 01 2     592617       4724       5830       3500                 
50434314100010080 SPRAYREGEN PAUL & SPRAYREGEN EMELINE       3,736,224.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 00 03 00 2    1353369       4850       5551       4448                 
50434314100010100 HYMAN PAUL G JR & HYMAN JUDY F       765,761.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 03 01 2     448417       4951       5472       4836                 
50434314100010121 FRANKEL KEITH        3,952,124.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    1495033       5591       6188       5100                 
50434314100020011 100 EVERGLADES LLC L DANIELS C/O       11,008,944.00 0.8738 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 07 01 2    2787905       7970       9662       7088                 
50434314100020012 MEISTER ROBERT        12,118,327.00 0.6279 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    3385230       9247      10019       8450                 
50434314100020020 MANOOGIAN ARMEN A TRUST        2,956,707.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 2000 00 01 00 1     115815       1040       1200        800                 
50434314100020020 MANOOGIAN ARMEN A TRUST        2,956,707.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 2000 04 03 01 3    1372204       5368       6331       5099                 
50434314100020040 SAFFER VIVIAN T        2,979,815.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1995 00 02 00 1      95474       1108       1404        850                 
50434314100020040 SAFFER VIVIAN T        2,979,815.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1995 00 03 01 2     458690       3829       4592       3382                 
50434314100020060 TABERNILLA FRANCISCO H & TABERNILLA HILDA M       513,311.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1965 00 03 01 1     207099       2858       3457       2367                 
50434314100020080 JOHNSTON LESLIE B        4,417,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1995 00 04 01 2    1378634       4940       5304       4834                 
50434314100020080 JOHNSTON LESLIE B        4,417,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 00 01 00 1     152169       1251       1496        680                 
50434314100020080 JOHNSTON LESLIE B        4,417,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1995 00 01 00 1      44822        402        402        402                 
50434314100020120 AGUILERA CLARA P CLARA P AGUILERA TR HLDR       556,322.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 00 03 00 1     271297       2693       2818       2469                 
50434314100020131 CARROLL PROPERTY TRUST CARROLL ELIZABETH TRS       3,165,929.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 03 05 00 2     727634       4252       4444       3868                 
50434314100020151 LATEINER DOROTHY K LATEINER DOROTHY K TR       476,957.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 00 03 00 1     196799       2816       3279       2257                 
50434314100020180 ROSE STEVEN H & COUDERT DALE       1,215,119.00 0.8867 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1925 00 05 01 2      16899       6666       7822       5728                 
50434314100020180 ROSE STEVEN H & COUDERT DALE       1,215,119.00 0.8867 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1925 01 01 00 1      11411       1080       1080       1080                 
50434314100020180 ROSE STEVEN H & COUDERT DALE       1,215,119.00 0.8867 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1995 00 04 01 1     393258       3741       3900       3410                 
50434314100020180 ROSE STEVEN H & COUDERT DALE       1,215,119.00 0.8867 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 00 00 1      37207        340        485          1                 
50434314100020250 NEDERLANDER JAMES L NEDERLANDER ORGANIZATION C/O       4,197,679.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 2000 00 03 00 2    1748152       5074       5370       4723                 
50434314100020270 EMMETT PAUL C & EMMETT GERALDINE       1,088,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1921 1990 00 04 00 2     415257       3072       3556       2713                 
50434314100020281 EVANS LESLIE & EVANS ESTHER       2,694,950.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1921 1960 00 02 00 1     102181       1352       1590        795                 
50434314100020281 EVANS LESLIE & EVANS ESTHER       2,694,950.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1921 1975 00 04 01 2     635923       4542       4628       4196                 
50434314100020301 KAUFMANN MAXIMILIAN & LOUISE KAUFMANN LOUISE       551,973.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1980 00 03 01 2     313995       3550       4389       2914                 
50434314100020320 TAJA REALTY TRUST        3,386,440.00 0.2688 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 04 05 01 2    1331015       4625       5545       3925                 
50434314100030031 LIPPER MARION E        459,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1970 00 02 00 1     130628       2442       2602       2182                 
50434314100030041 NORDHOFF WERNER W & EUGENE P SAWISKY       1,691.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314100030042 WHITE MICHELE C        765,728.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1931 00 01 00 2      30471        337        378        297                 
50434314100030042 WHITE MICHELE C        765,728.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1950 00 02 00 1      56183        488        564        456                 
50434314100030042 WHITE MICHELE C        765,728.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 01 01 00 2      75324        779        808        736                 
50434314100030051 PORTEN HERMAN I        1,898,189.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1999 03 02 00 2     101549       1084       1209        792                 
50434314100030051 PORTEN HERMAN I        1,898,189.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1999 03 03 01 2     946151       5067       5163       4683                 
50434314100030071 J NED INC NEDERLANDER ORGANIZATION C/O       2,782,237.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 00 04 00 1     355299       3940       4089       3636                 
50434314100030091 NEDERLANDER JAMES M & NEDERLANDER ORGANIZATION C/O       4,098,535.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 05 01 2    1619745       4846       5394       4405                 
50434314100030111 BAR ZEV ASHER ET AL        565,129.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 1      31420        432        504        264                 
50434314100030111 BAR ZEV ASHER ET AL        565,129.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 03 04 00 2     278107       3529       3603       3253                 
50434314100030131 FISHER TAMARA JEAN        1,096,708.00 0.35 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 01 00 1      53873        616        616        616                 
50434314100030131 FISHER TAMARA JEAN        1,096,708.00 0.35 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1995 00 02 00 1     279163       3060       3347       2658                 
50434314100030151 SMITH MATTHEW K & SMITH TRACY E       2,941,489.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 03 03 00 2     795167       3895       4406       3400                 
50434314100040010 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 0.53 RELIGIOUS           1973 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3316470      28651         
50434314100040050 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 0.13 RELIGIOUS                           
50434314100040060 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 0.13 RELIGIOUS                           
50434314100040070 PBOC INC        1,086,750.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314100040080 PBOC INC        1,035,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314100040090 PBOC INC        1,811,250.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314100040110 LAMBERT RAQUEL        1,596,489.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 01 2.5     826986       3757       4368       3326                 
50434314100040120 LEVITT JEFFREY S &        1,956,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 05 04 00 2     852720       3434       3999       2998                 
50434314100040130 DERRIN SCOTT LIEBERSON RHONA D       919,294.00 0 MISC. RESIDENCE           1925 1975 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME      23060        570         
50434314100040130 DERRIN SCOTT LIEBERSON RHONA D       919,294.00 0 MISC. RESIDENCE           1925 1975 0011 01 1 WOOD FRAME     115670       3568         
50434314100040140 KAUFMANN MAXIMILIAN & KAUFMANN LOUISE M       1,103,509.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 02 00 2      68509       1243       1264       1232                 
50434314100040150 TALBOT SHARON P        419,485.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 1       3587        504        504        504                 
50434314100040150 TALBOT SHARON P        419,485.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 03 01 2      21452       3087       3216       3036                 
50434314100040170 TALBOT SHARON P        1,758,482.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1922 1940 00 01 00 1       2270        450        450        450                 
50434314100040170 TALBOT SHARON P        1,758,482.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1922 1940 00 02 00 2       3783        913        980        896                 
50434314100040170 TALBOT SHARON P        1,758,482.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1922 1940 00 03 01 2       8624       2071       2404       1988                 
50434314100040170 TALBOT SHARON P        1,758,482.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1922 1940 00 03 01 2      16153       3190       3446       3126                 
50434314100040190 ATLANTIC FUNDING LIMITED PROFIT COOLEY WILLIAM TR       1,631,110.00 0 RESTAURANT           1925 2005 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     516150       3850         
50434314100040190 ATLANTIC FUNDING LIMITED PROFIT COOLEY WILLIAM TR       1,631,110.00 0 RESTAURANT           1954 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     244960       1428         
50434314100050050 BAGLEY VICKI        1,456,911.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1945 00 01 00 1      38552        580        750        325                 
50434314100050050 BAGLEY VICKI        1,456,911.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 03 00 2     442636       2704       2704       2704                 
50434314100050060 OHARA TIMOTHY & OHARA TIERNEY E       346,279.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1940 00 01 01 1      44097        728        920        440                 
50434314100050060 OHARA TIMOTHY & OHARA TIERNEY E       346,279.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     177404       2362       2394       2178                 
50434314100050091 HASSETT ROBERT W        2,373,103.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1435790       3993       4288       3639                 
50434314100050101 PITT MURRAY C PITT MURRAY C TR       2,150,446.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1251178       3848       4071       3534                 
50434314100050111 BUCHMAN SYLVAN & BUCHMAN SHIRLEY       1,414,495.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1230819       3901       4186       3554                 
50434314100050121 HARITON LEON TR & ANITA S ROSENBLOOM C/O       2,224,276.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1230663       3900       4202       3549                 
50434314100050131 MENDEZ ALBERT O & ALBERT O MENDEZ TR TITL HLDR       1,387,976.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 05 00 2    1236532       4398       4602       4028                 
50434314100050141 FRAZEE LORETTA        2,298,810.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 05 01 2    1301802       4019       4334       3651                 
50434314100050151 BETULOVICI YULIAN J        1,304,573.00 0.17 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2     720587       3388       3810       3067                 
50434314100050160 LIPIN ROBERT P & LIPIN BETH ANNE       2,082,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 00 00 2    1100961       3217       3363       2903                 
50434314100050170 FELDMAN MARILYN M MARILYN M FELDMAN TR HLDR       610,212.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 00 00 00 2    1143304       3217       3363       2903                 
50434314100050311 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.0218 MUNICIPAL                           
50434314100050320 ROSENTHAL LOIS        1,189,074.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1990 00 03 00 2     197022       1819       1909       1567                 
50434314100050330 FONTAINE HANNO J TRUST FONTAINE HANNO J TR       1,084,504.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1965 00 02 00 1     106796       1456       1481       1445                 
50434314100050350 CRAWFORD PATRICIA E TRUST CRAWFORD PATRICIA E TR       1,871,291.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2     885591       3391       3819       3070                 
50434314100050360 NAGLE GARRETT J        1,550,604.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 03 03 01 2     575494       3599       3744       3260                 
50434314100050370 FORTY TWO HUNDRED SEMINOLE INC        1,561,672.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 03 03 01 2     586562       3599       3744       3260                 
50434314100050380 GOLINO ANDRE &        1,238,346.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 04 00 2     696156       3247       3408       2932                 
50434314100050390 SULLIVAN CLAIRE J & SULLIVAN PETER J       645,462.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1955 00 02 00 2     110039       1702       1728       1552                 
50434314100050390 SULLIVAN CLAIRE J & SULLIVAN PETER J       645,462.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 00 01 00 1      26934        414        483        252                 
50434314100050400 HOFFMAN HERBERT S & HOFFMAN DIANE B       1,966,082.00 0.2 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 02 1    1094170       4817       5113       4380                 
50434314100050411 BURNICHON EMMANUEL & BURNICHON SOPHIA H       2,075,349.00 0.2 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 02 1    1088579       4792       5113       4380                 
50434314100050430 WARSHAVER JOANNE BARRY PINCISS RESIDUARY TRUST       1,013,575.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1950 00 02 00 1      73470        968        968        968                 
50434314100050430 WARSHAVER JOANNE BARRY PINCISS RESIDUARY TRUST       1,013,575.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1975 00 04 01 2     480727       3858       3858       3858                 
50434314100050440 KELLEHER DOROTHY R & DOROTHY R KELLEHER TR TITL HLDR       537,738.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1922 1960 00 03 01 2     204379       3012       3051       2995                 
50434314100050450 SCHWERIN BRENDA H        1,149,774.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1975 00 03 00 2     364829       2777       2932       2648                 
50434314100050460 BARBERIAN HELEN        1,151,191.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1970 00 03 00 3     184701       2205       2654       2070                 
50434314100050470 SEMINOLE BD LLC        2,875,862.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    1661774       5293       5543       4934                 
50434314120000011 COLEMAN PETER K        485,630.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1970 00 02 00 2     283666       2226       2515       2117                 
50434314120000031 ROOT OCEAN PROPERTY LLC        745,121.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1926 1950 0008 01 2 FIRE RESIS     169940       4900         
50434314120000050 FLAMMARION DONNA P        813,945.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1900 1980 02 02 00 3     310001       1627       1879       1507                 
50434314120000060 FARRELL JOHN J        220,488.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1900 1931 00 02 00 2     113306       1715       1852       1644                 
50434314120000071 TRACY HELEN K        89,818.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 01 00 1      98682        734        734        734                 
50434314120000072 HERSHEY COLIN H        718,099.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 1     114349        941        960        936                 
50434314120000081 HOFFMEIER MARGARET        715,281.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 01 00 1     111531        760        760        760                 
50434314120000082 HOFFMEIER MARGARET K        736,303.00 0.0726 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 01 00 1      51379        654        654        654                 
50434314120000082 HOFFMEIER MARGARET K        736,303.00 0.0726 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 02 01 00 1      81174       1051       1061       1061                 
50434314120000100 MITCHELL ELSIE P TR GRAHAM JOHN K TR       1,072,926.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1985 00 03 00 2     348426       2513       2599       2311                 
50434314120000111 GASQUE CONSTANCE T        82,028.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1945 00 02 00 2     108658       1140       1198        926                 
50434314120000121 NORDOFF W W & E P SAWISKY NORDOFF E P SAWISKY       83,520.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 02 00 2     124135        969        990        990                 
50434314120000122 ALLEN STEVEN        657,847.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 01 00 1      54097        708        708        708                 
50434314120000140 PALM BEACH FRAMEMAKERS INC        885,970.00 0 STORES           1969 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     281170       3279         
50434314120000160 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 0 RELIGIOUS                           
50434314120000180 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 0.0643 RELIGIOUS                           
50434314130000010 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0 RELIGIOUS                           
50434314130000110 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0 RELIGIOUS                           
50434314140000010 MORRISON CARLA MORGAN STANLEY TRUST TR TITL HLDR       7,569,557.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1995 05 06 01 2    2602514       8954      13887       6926                 
50434314140000021 MARBARRY HOLDINGS INC        5,730,034.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1975 00 05 01 2     258538       5842       7167       4901                 
50434314140000040 AYLWARD E WILLIAM & E WILLIAM AYLWARD TR TITL HLDR       5,111,043.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1999 00 08 01 2    3453437      10120      10505       9709                 
50434314140000050 BURT PETER & BURT PATRICIA       5,177,791.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 06 08 01 2    1829654       6276       6777       5719                 
50434314140000060 MATTHEWS ROBERT V        15,791,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    4272163      14249      15849      12077                 
50434314140000071 KESSLER PATRICIA M & HOWARD J & PATRICIA M KESSLER RES TRUST       29,387,431.00 4.2716 SINGLE FAMILY 1975 1980 00 03 01 1     494385       4774       6847       4270                 
50434314140000071 KESSLER PATRICIA M & HOWARD J & PATRICIA M KESSLER RES TRUST       29,387,431.00 4.2716 SINGLE FAMILY 1975 1995 05 08 01 1    3002587      19461      21720      16349                 
50434314140000071 KESSLER PATRICIA M & HOWARD J & PATRICIA M KESSLER RES TRUST       29,387,431.00 4.2716 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 03 00 2     560339       3409       3686       2988                 
50434314140000072 EBERLEIN HOLDINGS INC        18,167,945.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 05 07 01 1    4614823      11777      13773      10582                 
50434314140000090 LUCILLE KIMMEL TRUST        957,203.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1975 00 04 01 1     357172       4466       5086       3718                 
50434314140000100 CEDRON ERICK J & GOSSETT W TED       1,318,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1975 00 06 01 2     702961       6799       8733       5841                 
50434314140000110 GEWIRZ BERNARD S & GEWIRZ SARAH M       6,127,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1995 00 02 00 1     310285       1356       1558        886                 
50434314140000110 GEWIRZ BERNARD S & GEWIRZ SARAH M       6,127,358.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1995 00 04 01 1    1188759       5542       5607       5607                 
50434314150000010 BARBATELLI LOVEDY P        1,393,320.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1971 00 04 00 1     486011       4999       5286       4005                 
50434314150000020 CLARK ALFRED C        5,070,859.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    2216137       9185       9760       8609                 
50434314150000030 RILEY CHARLES R & RILEY CAROLYN B       4,695,693.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 06 00 1    1243245       5045       5512       4516                 
50434314150000041 GENDELMAN LORI PENTACORP INC TR HLDR       5,764,954.00 0.46 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 07 05 04 2    3798928       7962       9039       7224                 
50434314150000050 HENDERSON GUY & HENDERSON MICHELLE       4,281,283.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1990 00 05 01 1      41283       5574       6180       4620                 
50434314150000060 MEYERS MARTIN &        4,599,314.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 03 05 00 1    1399906       6150       6540       5550                 
50434314150000070 MARRON DONALD B C/O LIGHTYEAR  CAPITAL       7,395,776.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 06 07 01 2    3162111       7590       8287       7141                 
50434314150000080 RENGLA ROBERT E NEDERLANDER SR C/O       6,004,979.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1990 04 06 01 1    1278549       7248       8066       6279                 
50434314160000010 COUNTY ROAD PROPERTY LLC HAYS & COMPANY LLP C/O       65,018,718.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1960 00 03 00 2     276470       4365       5269       2940                 
50434314160000010 COUNTY ROAD PROPERTY LLC HAYS & COMPANY LLP C/O       65,018,718.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 02 03 01 1     482656       3652       6431       2871                 
50434314160000010 COUNTY ROAD PROPERTY LLC HAYS & COMPANY LLP C/O       65,018,718.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 02 03 01 1     655352       4958       8264       4132                 
50434314160000010 COUNTY ROAD PROPERTY LLC HAYS & COMPANY LLP C/O       65,018,718.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 06 07 00 1   10985509      40155      61774      29342                 
50434314170000010 WRIGHT ROSITA H        1,210,982.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1975 00 06 01 1     539090       6315       7759       5635                 
50434314170000020 FANJUL ANDRES B & FANJUL CATHERINE A       1,996,407.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 00 08 01 2    1004341       9286       9789       9154                 
50434314170000030 VISCAYA CORP        12,101,289.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1975 00 08 01 1    1050915       9836      10113       9491                 
50434314180000010 COCHRANE MARJORIE C        1,123,493.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1975 00 04 01 1      16642       3735       4437       3180                 
50434314180000021 141 WELLS ROAD LAND TRUST KRASKER PAUL A TRUSTEE       5,117,191.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1980 00 05 00 2     501750       5528       6034       4992                 
50434314190000010 MUSSO LUCIA N        5,280,510.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00     1946406       6441       7336       5670                 
50434314190000020 KOCH ANGELA B        5,469,867.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1990 05 08 01 2    1320374       8321       8986       7787                 
50434314190000020 KOCH ANGELA B        5,469,867.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 00 01 00 1      91386        911       1062        846                 
50434314190000040 MINTMIRE PATRICIA R        1,199,724.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1985 03 04 01 1     549028       6408       7276       5425                 
50434314190000050 BOLLERO JOHN A & KATHIE KATHIE BOLLERO       1,630,098.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 05 05 01 2     901796       6154       7084       5394                 
50434314190000060 POPPEL HARVEY L &        3,680,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434314190000070 KHUBANI NEETA & KHUBANI ANAND       13,122,670.00 1.016 VACANT                           
50434314190000090 SAUL JOSEPH E & NORMA        8,414,857.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1975 00 05 00 2    1051426       5639       5871       5319                 
50434314190000100 SNIDER ELIOT I & SNIDER RUTH F       4,342,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 05 01 2    1873893       7255       9316       6409                 
50434314190000110 SCHEERER R P & JO ANNE T SCHEERER JO ANNE T       1,016,763.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1975 00 03 01 1     304281       3803       4300       3334                 
50434314190000120 SCHLAGER S LAWRENCE & SCHLAGER JUDITH P       4,430,237.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 05 00 2    1656727       7172       7471       6671                 
50434314190000130 ROBERSON CLIVE & CAROLYN ROBERSON CAROLYN       2,418,920.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 03 04 00 2    1529267       6666       7474       6006                 
50434314190000140 FLEMING VALERIE E FLEMING VALERIE E TR       1,162,393.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1988 00 05 01 1    1185608       5946       7027       5152                 
50434314200000010 ROSENBERG MARVIN M & BAYLIE R ROSENBERG BAYLIE R       1,826,776.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 00 06 01 2     775306       6148       7295       5108                 
50434314200000020 FANJUL ALEXANDER L & NICOLE R FANJUL NICOLE R       2,554,687.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1985 00 06 01 2     959912       6944       7950       5801                 
50434314200000032 TARNOPOL MICHAEL L & TARNOPOL LYNNE       8,095,401.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1980 00 07 01 1    1164879       8956      10018       7891                 
50434314200000060 SILVERMAN NORMAN S & LOIS E SILVERMAN TRS       6,317,910.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1998 00 06 01 2    2609759       7078       7776       6475                 
50434314210002010 BUNCHER BERNITA L        1,962,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    1962450 
50434314210002020 KOPS DANIEL W & KOPS NANCY N       739,023.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2281650 
50434314210002030 MORRIS IRVING & IRVING MORRIS TR TITL HLDR       743,929.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1480500 
50434314210002040 LUCAS MARY C        256,863.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     704550 
50434314210002050 JABLIN SHARON        243,291.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1024800 
50434314210002060 LEBER DANIEL W & LEBER ARDITH       495,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1977   1154     495600 
50434314210002070 STEIN MICHELLE        495,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1977   1154     495600 
50434314210002080 LEVIN I VICTOR        257,363.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     704550 
50434314210002090 SUSWEN LLC CORPORATION SERVICES COMPANY       810,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     810600 
50434314210002100 STEIN MICHELLE B        810,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     810600 
50434314210002110 KEARNEY JOHN K        2,010,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1977   2025    2010750 
50434314210002120 MANNING BURTON        2,281,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2281650 
50434314210002130 MAJTELES EVELYN        584,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2130 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    1962450 
50434314210002140 SCADUTO JOHN V & JEANNE E        1,248,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1248450 
50434314210002150 RICKEL ANNETTE U        572,745.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1977   1547    1271550 
50434314210002160 HOFFMAN PETER & HOFFMAN LINDA       1,222,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1222200 
50434314210002170 STEINBERG EDWARD L        918,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     918750 
50434314210002180 SLATKIN LESLIE RUBIN        535,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1977   1360     535500 
50434314210002190 KIDDON JOAN        548,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2190 0400 CONDO 1977   1391     548100 
50434314210002200 GREEN EDYTHE F TRUST GREEN EDYTHE F TRUSTEE       598,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1977   1520     598500 
50434314210002210 PHILLIPS WALTER C III & PHILLIPS JEAN M       529,890.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1977   1665     655200 
50434314210002220 KOPELMAN RUTH        479,685.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1198050 
50434314210002230 FREE FLORENCE        226,713.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2230 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1248450 
50434314210002240 FREE FLORENCE        512,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2240 0400 CONDO 1977   1154     512400 
50434314210002250 JCMASCARI LLC MICHAEL MASCARI C/O       512,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2250 0400 CONDO 1977   1154     512400 
50434314210003010 TOMARKEN PHYLISS        344,763.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    1982450 
50434314210003020 POMERANTZ MYRON TR        2,301,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2301650 
50434314210003030 GRAY HERBERT P & GRAY MARYLOU       1,453,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1580500 
50434314210003040 HIRSCH RICHARD & HIRSCH ELAINE B       714,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     714550 
50434314210003050 GLORIA HAMBURGER TR        1,034,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1034800 
50434314210003060 HALLENBECK DIANE F        1,243,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1243200 
50434314210003070 SHAER ROBERT H TR & FRIEDMAN RUDOLPH C/O       1,243,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1243200 
50434314210003080 HOWARD RAQUEL G        251,831.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     714550 
50434314210003090 COREN BENEDICT E        528,509.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     820600 
50434314210003100 MILLER MORGAN & MARJORIE        820,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     820600 
50434314210003110 STEINBERG EDWARD L & STEINBERG JUDITH A       920,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1977   2025    2030750 
50434314210003120 COVIELLO PAUL J & COVIELLO MARY       2,244,175.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2301650 
50434314210003130 KEARNEY JOHN K        1,982,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3130 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    1982450 
50434314210003140 NEISLOSS HELEN R TRUST NEISLOSS HELEN R TR       1,268,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1268450 
50434314210003150 GELBOIM ELLEN S &        1,291,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1977   1547    1291550 
50434314210003160 NADLER MURRAY & ELIZABETH NADLER ET AL TR HLDRS       488,098.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1242200 
50434314210003170 SWEIG MORTON A        938,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     938750 
50434314210003180 MARCUS PAMELA        545,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3180 0400 CONDO 1977   1360     545500 
50434314210003190 BRADFIELD GEOFFREY M        558,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3190 0400 CONDO 1977   1391     558100 
50434314210003200 BELFER LAUREN H ELINOR BELFER ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       517,530.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3200 0400 CONDO 1977   1520     608500 
50434314210003210 BRIZEL VICTOR BRIZEL BARBARA       183,294.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3210 0400 CONDO 1977   1665     665200 
50434314210003220 WINTER JUDITH        488,098.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3220 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1218050 
50434314210003230 UZNIS EVELYN R TRUST UZNIS GEORGE M & UZNIS SHARON S TRS       1,268,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3230 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1268450 
50434314210003240 KAPLAN GAIL & KAPLAN JAMES       1,246,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3240 0400 CONDO 1977   1623    1246350 
50434314210003250 WINIK ELIANE K        710,140.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3250 0400 CONDO 1977   1623    1246350 
50434314210004010 BRESKMAN JOSEPH & DOROTHY P BRESKMAN DOROTHY P       421,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    2002450 
50434314210004020 BENJAMIN DONALD A & ANNE J        2,321,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2321650 
50434314210004030 SUNRISE HOLDINGS INC MARIA CANNARIATO C/O       1,848,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1848000 
50434314210004040 RAPAPORT DAVID A H & P A RAPAORT & M S RAPAPORT TRS       724,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     724550 
50434314210004050 GORMAN ALBERT M & GORMAN GRETCHEN B       1,044,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1044800 
50434314210004060 ZARO JEROLD L & ZARO TONI K       1,263,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1263200 
50434314210004070 KLINEMAN ANNE L        1,263,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1263200 
50434314210004080 PEARCE DAVID B        724,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     724550 
50434314210004090 WOLF ELLEN        830,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     830600 
50434314210004100 KEATES CELESTE A TR        830,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     830600 
50434314210004110 RODBELL HELEN D        2,000,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1977   2025    2050750 
50434314210004120 WIRRAL TRUST CO LTD        2,321,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2321650 
50434314210004130 SYLVANE BESSIE        421,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    2002450 
50434314210004140 KASKEL ALFRED L TRUST KASKEL HOWARD TRUSTEE &       1,288,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1288450 
50434314210004150 COVIELLO PAUL J &        1,311,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1977   1547    1311550 
50434314210004160 ABRAHAM S DANIEL & ABRAHAM EWA       1,262,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1262200 
50434314210004170 MILCHIN RUTH        220,169.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     958750 
50434314210004180 GIULIANI JOSEPH C & GIULIANI PATRICIA       555,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1977   1360     555500 
50434314210004190 SCHUSTER MICHAEL &        568,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1977   1391     568100 
50434314210004200 BELL DAVID E &        618,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1977   1520     618500 
50434314210004210 KAPLAN BERTRAM D & MIRIAM G        675,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1977   1665     675200 
50434314210004220 AUERBACH DAVID & AUERBACH EVELYN       1,014,869.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1238050 
50434314210004230 SASLOVE JOSHUA        687,273.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4230 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1288450 
50434314210004240 SCHATTIE RICHARD TR        1,266,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4240 0400 CONDO 1977   1623    1266350 
50434314210004250 FRIEDLAND LAWRENCE &        1,266,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4250 0400 CONDO 1977   1623    1266350 
50434314210005010 COHEN NORMAN A        2,022,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    2022450 
50434314210005020 ROBERTS CALVIN W        2,341,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2341650 
50434314210005030 KEARNEY JOHN K        1,868,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1868000 
50434314210005040 CHAN MIRIAM        267,657.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     734550 
50434314210005050 LANDAU EDWARD &        780,180.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1054800 
50434314210005060 SLIFKA SYLVIA        455,951.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1283200 
50434314210005070 FODIMAN SANFORD S & FODIMAN FERN       532,424.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1283200 
50434314210005080 LAUREN LEONARD        734,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     734550 
50434314210005090 KORWIN PAMELA        840,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     840600 
50434314210005100 SUCHERMAN STUART & MILLER BETSY       840,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     840600 
50434314210005110 FRANK STEVEN R        2,070,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1977   2025    2070750 
50434314210005120 RODBELL THELMA S        1,418,021.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2341650 
50434314210005130 SMITH NORMA K        2,022,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5130 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    2022450 
50434314210005140 SOLOMON BEATRICE        2,060,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1977   3296    2060100 
50434314210005150 WAXMAN GAYLE TRUST        1,331,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1977   1547    1331550 
50434314210005160 MARKOWITZ PATRICIA        498,211.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1282200 
50434314210005170 RATNER DANIEL TR & RATNER ILANA TR       978,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     978750 
50434314210005180 WAXMAN GAYLE TRUST        565,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5180 0400 CONDO 1977   1360     565500 
50434314210005190 SCHLOSS RICHARD & MARCUS SCHLOSS & CO INC C/O       578,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5190 0400 CONDO 1977   1391     578100 
50434314210005200 FARBER EVELYN FARBER EVELYN TR       656,752.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5200 0400 CONDO 1977   3025    1072050 
50434314210005220 SAGNER ALAN        1,208,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5220 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1258050 
50434314210005230 KOGAN REVA REVA KOGAN TRUST       1,258,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5230 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1308450 
50434314210005240 BRAVER DAVID A & BRAVER LOUISE T       1,286,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5240 0400 CONDO 1977   1623    1286350 
50434314210006010 FRIEDLAND LAWRENCE & FRIEDLAND MARILYN       2,042,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    2042450 
50434314210006020 GOTTFRIED JEANETTE GOTTFRIED JEANETTE       1,081,246.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2361650 
50434314210006030 BLUESPIRIT INVSTMNT CORP        1,888,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1888000 
50434314210006040 PACKIN JANE B        551,345.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     744550 
50434314210006050 TAWFIK HARRY D        258,366.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1064800 
50434314210006060 HAYAT CLAUDE &        1,303,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1303200 
50434314210006070 STERN EVAN & STERN SANDRA F       1,303,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1977   1612    1303200 
50434314210006080 SINGER MADELEINE SINGER LESLIE &       275,571.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1977   1547     744550 
50434314210006090 PAPPAS CHARLES A & HELEN K        850,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     850600 
50434314210006100 HAPPY SEAGULL LTD        850,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     850600 
50434314210006110 KLINE HESS TR        2,090,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1977   2025    2090750 
50434314210006120 MILLER WAREHOUSE CO        2,361,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1977   1646    2361650 
50434314210006130 VICKERS ESTHER M        2,042,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6130 0400 CONDO 1977   1780    2042450 
50434314210006140 ELIAS ELEANOR        258,866.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1328450 
50434314210006150 KRAUSS HERBERT        532,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1977   1547    1351550 
50434314210006160 FEINBERG DAVID H & FEINBERG CAROL       1,302,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1302200 
50434314210006170 FOURTH DIMENSION DEV LLC        998,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     998750 
50434314210006180 ROSEN CARL        575,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6180 0400 CONDO 1977   1360     575500 
50434314210006190 BLUMSTEIN ESTHER L BLUMSTEIN ESTHER L TR       513,410.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6190 0400 CONDO 1977   1391     588100 
50434314210006200 COOPER JUDITH        1,080,850.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6200 0400 CONDO 1977   3185    1130850 
50434314210006220 MACK RUTH MACK FREDERICK       1,278,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6220 0400 CONDO 1977   1972    1278050 
50434314210006230 MACK FRED        1,328,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6230 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1328450 
50434314210006240 GARGANO CHARLES        1,306,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6240 0400 CONDO 1977   1623    1306350 
50434314210006250 WEINER CHARLES TRUST & WEINER I SHIRLEY TRUST       1,306,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6250 0400 CONDO 1977   1623    1306350 
50434314210007010 SHAPIRO ALBERT & SHAPIRO DIANE       2,375,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1977   2382    2719500 
50434314210007020 STONE CAROL TR        3,207,418.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1977   5095    3797850 
50434314210007030 SCHULHOF HANNELORE B        1,688,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1977   2018    1688400 
50434314210007040 LUCKY SEAGULL LLC RICHARDS & POLANSKY C/O       2,149,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1977   2220    2149350 
50434314210007050 HOFFMAN RICHARD D        2,711,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1977   2991    2711100 
50434314210007060 LOWENSTEIN LUCILLE ROBERT FISHER C/O       1,113,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1977   2341    1302000 
50434314210007070 MELTZER BERNICE        772,607.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1977   2991    1667400 
50434314210007080 SINGER JOHN S        2,568,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1977   2811    2568300 
50434314210007090 WOLF PAMELA        2,445,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1977   2371    2445450 
50434314210007100 ZELMAN MARTIN        1,765,890.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1977   2433    2035950 
50434314210007110 COHEN JOANNE R        2,107,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1977   2772    2107350 
50434314210010190 GELBOIM ELLEN S &        48,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1977    177      48300 
50434314210010200 VICKERS ESTHER M        48,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1977    177      48300 
50434314210010210 RODBELL HELEN D        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1977    255      57750 
50434314210010220 NADLER ELIZABETH        54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010230 COHEN JOANNE R        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1977    201      51450 
50434314210010240 WINIK ELAINE K        54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010250 SMITH NORMA K & CAROL K STONE       54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010260 MILCHIN RUTH        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1977    201      51450 
50434314210010270 SINGER JOHN S        54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010280 LEVIN I VICTOR        54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010290 MACK RUTH MACK FREDERICK       54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010300 WAXMAN GAYLE LIVING TRUST        54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010310 SWEIG MORTON A        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1977    201      51450 
50434314210010320 HALLENBECK DIANE        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1977    201      51450 
50434314210010330 LUCKY SEAGULL LLC RICHARDS & POLANSKY C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1977    201      51450 
50434314210010340 SUNRISE HOLDINGS INC MARIA CANNARIATO C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0340 0400 CONDO 1977    201      51450 
50434314210010350 MORRIS IRVING MORRIS DORIS R       57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0350 0400 CONDO 1977    255      57750 
50434314210010360 KRAUSS HERBERT I        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0360 0400 CONDO 1977    255      57750 
50434314210010370 SCHULHOF HANNELORE B        45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0370 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010380 WOLF PAMELA        45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0380 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010390 WOLF PAMELA        45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0390 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010400 AUERBACH DAVID & AUERBACH EVELYN       45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0400 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010410 ZARO JEROLD L &        54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0410 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010420 MILLER MORGAN & MILLER MARJORIE       45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0420 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010430 COHEN NORMAN        45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0430 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010440 SHAPIRO ALBERT        45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0440 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010450 SHAER ROBERT H TR & FRIEDMAN RUDOLPH C/O       45,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0450 0400 CONDO 1977    132      45150 
50434314210010460 STONE CAROL TR        54,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0460 0400 CONDO 1977    222      54600 
50434314210010470 COVIELLO PAUL J & COVIELLO MARY       112,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0470 0400 CONDO 1977    597     112350 
50434314210010480 COVIELLO PAUL J & COVIELLO MARY       50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0480 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010490 ENGELS GULDEN DOROTHY        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0490 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010500 KAS ALI M        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0500 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010510 SCHATTIE RICHARD J TR        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0510 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010520 TOMARKEN PHYLISS        58,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0520 0400 CONDO 1977    257      58800 
50434314210010530 HIRSCH RICHARD & HIRSCH ELAINE B       58,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0530 0400 CONDO 1977    257      58800 
50434314210010540 BRESKMAN JOSEPH & DOROTHY P        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0540 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010550 GRAY HERBERT P & GRAY MARYLOU       53,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0550 0400 CONDO 1977    208      53550 
50434314210010560 KEARNEY JOHN K        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0560 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010570 LOWENSTEIN LUCILLE ROBERT FISHER C/O       61,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0570 0400 CONDO 1977    300      61950 
50434314210010580 MAJTELES EVELYN        58,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0580 0400 CONDO 1977    257      58800 
50434314210010590 FRIEDLAND LAWRENCE &        58,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0590 0400 CONDO 1977    257      58800 
50434314210010600 FRIEDLAND LAWRENCE &        58,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0600 0400 CONDO 1977    257      58800 
50434314210010610 FRANK STEVEN        58,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0610 0400 CONDO 1977    257      58800 
50434314210010620 BRIZEL VICTOR L & BRIZEL BARBARA M       50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0620 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010630 PAPPAS CHARLES A & HELEN K        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0630 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010640 PAPPAS CHARLES A & HELEN K        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0640 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010650 FEINBERG DAVID H & FEINBERG CAROL       50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0650 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010660 GORMAN ALBERT & GORMAN BROS INC C/O       50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0660 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010670 GORMAN ALBERT & GRETCHEN L GORMAN BROS INC C/O       50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0670 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010680 GOTTFRIED ISAAC & JEANETTE B        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0680 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010690 GOTTFRIED ISAAC & JEANETTE B        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0690 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010700 NEISLOSS HELEN R        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0700 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010710 KLINE HESS TR        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0710 0400 CONDO 1977    143      50400 
50434314210010720 SAGNER ALAN        34,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0720 0400 CONDO 1977    106      34650 
50434314210010730 SAGNER ALAN        40,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0730 0400 CONDO 1977    121      40950 
50434314210020010 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED ASSOC        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210020030 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210020040 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED ASSN        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210020060 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210030010 COHEN NORMAN A        78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030020 SMITH NORMA K & CAROL K STONE       78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030030 KLINE HESS TR        78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030040 ZDARSKY CONSTANTIN        78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030050 FRIEDLAND LAWRENCE & FRIEDLAND MARILYN       78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030060 VICKERS ESTHER M        78,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030070 HALLENBECK DIANE        78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030080 SCHATTIE RICHARD        78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030090 SCHULHOF RUDOLPH B & HANNELORE        78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210030100 MACK RUTH        78,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210040010 HIRSCH RICHARD & HIRSCH ELAINE       2,041,930.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1977   4774    2187150 
50434314210040030 MELTZER JERALDINE MELTZER STEVEN       1,049,384.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1977   2408    1321950 
50434314210040040 SPEKTOR ERYK & MIRA        1,508,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1977   2434    1508850 
50434314210040050 CHANIN LEONA F CHANIN LEONA F TR       1,178,288.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1977   2457    1459500 
50434314210040060 SILVER ADRIANNE        1,115,717.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1977   2383    1350300 
50434314210040070 NEWMAN BRUCE & JUDITH TRS        1,486,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1977   2560    1486800 
50434314210040080 PB 130 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MIDLAND GROUP OF CO INC C/O       1,325,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1977   2476    1325100 
50434314210040090 SCHNEIDER RITA        1,220,109.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1977   2434    1508850 
50434314210042010 CABLE ANDREW & CABLE DEBORAH       1,110,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1673    1110900 
50434314210042020 LEVIN ELISABETH L        804,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     804300 
50434314210042030 STEINBERG RICHARD        858,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     858900 
50434314210042040 E & R GORDON LLC        858,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     858900 
50434314210042050 DEGNAN CONCHITA DEGNAN CONCHITA TR       744,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     744450 
50434314210042060 BOWERS DAVID E LAND TRUST BOWERS DAVID E TR       757,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     757050 
50434314210042070 BELL FRANK S JR REVOCABLE TRUST BELL FRANK S JR TRUSTEE       974,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     974400 
50434314210042080 STEINBERG JANET M        729,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     729750 
50434314210042090 POPPER ABBY & ERDOS ERDA       772,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     772800 
50434314210042100 GOULD HELEN M        233,016.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     772800 
50434314210042110 FINK VICTOR        639,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     729750 
50434314210042120 GOLD MARVIN R &        974,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     974400 
50434314210042130 HEALY CORNELIUS F & JEANNE S GOLD       310,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2130 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     585900 
50434314210042140 LEVINE NAOMI & KIDDON JOAN S       544,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     544950 
50434314210042150 ASCHER BERTHA ASCHER BERTHA TR       162,275.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     571200 
50434314210042160 KAS ALI        449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     449400 
50434314210042170 ALLEN HELAINE E        449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     449400 
50434314210042180 POLLAK ENID        188,570.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     449400 
50434314210042190 WELTZ CAROL C        538,053.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 2190 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     843150 
50434314210043010 BAL BEATA MAYEFSKY ALLAN ESQ TR       787,390.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     853650 
50434314210043020 MAZER LOIS        814,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     814300 
50434314210043030 FORSTADT RONA & FORSTADT JOSEPH L       863,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     863900 
50434314210043040 CHANIN PAUL R        607,732.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     863900 
50434314210043050 ABRAMS STEPHEN M &        749,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     749450 
50434314210043060 BARASCH HELEN L        651,430.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     767050 
50434314210043070 MAGLIOCCO PATRICIA A        984,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     984400 
50434314210043080 WAGNER BEVERLY P STRAUS JEFFREY P TR       176,721.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     739750 
50434314210043090 EMDEN ROBERT & MARJORIE W        782,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     782800 
50434314210043100 PARKWOOD INV CO        782,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     782800 
50434314210043110 DORAN JAMES F        739,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     739750 
50434314210043120 BAUER JOSEF & BAUER BINNIE       600,279.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     984400 
50434314210043130 BRAMS JOAN        226,988.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3130 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     590900 
50434314210043140 BRANDT ROXANNE        549,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     549950 
50434314210043150 SMITH ERIC S & SMITH SANDRA       389,058.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     576200 
50434314210043160 COBO JOSE &        454,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     454400 
50434314210043170 FERUCH GILBERT &        454,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     454400 
50434314210043180 MILLER HAROLD H        454,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3180 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     454400 
50434314210043190 BELMAR ANITA &        268,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 3190 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     853150 
50434314210044010 LEDER GEORGE B & LEDER JACQUELINE M       456,260.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     863650 
50434314210044020 ISACOFF JAY S & ISACOFF PAULA K       774,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     824300 
50434314210044030 WERNER FREDERIC P & WERNER JACQUELINE R       868,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     868900 
50434314210044040 MILCH ELY & AMY        868,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     868900 
50434314210044050 BLOOMBERG REALTY CO INC        754,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     754450 
50434314210044060 SPECTER PATRICIA B        777,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     777050 
50434314210044070 ALLEN SELMA B        276,703.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     994400 
50434314210044080 ZUKOV NIKITA & ZUKOV PAULA       749,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     749750 
50434314210044090 RABB SIDNEY TRUST F/B/O CAROL R GOLDBERG GOLDBERG CAROL TR       792,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     792800 
50434314210044100 ROTTER SAUL D        174,459.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     792800 
50434314210044110 SCHLAGER ROBERT A BULFINCH CO INC C/O       749,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     749750 
50434314210044120 E & R GORDON LLC        994,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     994400 
50434314210044130 GROSSMAN SETH        595,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     595900 
50434314210044140 LAURIA AVRIL Y        440,280.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     554950 
50434314210044150 BUNCHER COMPANY        581,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     581200 
50434314210044160 MILCH FLORENCE        459,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     459400 
50434314210044170 RATTINGER MARK        459,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     459400 
50434314210044180 PANTANO ANTHONY &        459,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     459400 
50434314210044190 PECK ELLEN PECK ARTHUR K JR       417,934.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     863150 
50434314210045010 GOLDSTEIN LOIS        873,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     873650 
50434314210045020 ALPER CAROLYN S TR        834,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     834300 
50434314210045030 CORNSTEIN MARC BARRY & CORNSTEIN NATASHA STRAUSS       873,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     873900 
50434314210045040 STERN KAROL        445,365.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     873900 
50434314210045050 KAUFMAN JUDITH W        172,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     759450 
50434314210045060 LEVENTHAL GABRIEL & LEVENTHAL MURIEL       787,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     787050 
50434314210045070 EDER LINDA        1,378,465.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1977   3563    1590750 
50434314210045090 ISEN HAROLD &        802,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     802800 
50434314210045100 FLEURY JOELLE C        182,372.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     802800 
50434314210045110 WEINSTEIN BERNICE WEINSTEIN BERNICE TR       263,314.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     759750 
50434314210045120 MACK RUTH MACK DAVID       1,004,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1977   1983    1004400 
50434314210045130 BYRNE JAMES F        600,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5130 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     600900 
50434314210045140 ROSMARIN ADAM M &        559,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     559950 
50434314210045150 KLEBANOW BERTRAM KLEBANOW CYNTHIA       489,720.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     586200 
50434314210045160 PAPPAS HELEN K        464,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     464400 
50434314210045170 SHANE MATTHEW & SHANE MARILYN       464,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     464400 
50434314210045180 SERGE & REAL COUTURE INC        464,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5180 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     464400 
50434314210045190 KATZ STANLEY M TR        873,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 5190 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     873150 
50434314210046010 BASKIN ARNOLD M & MYRNA F BASKIN TRS       883,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1977   1644     883650 
50434314210046020 SCHILDER HERBERT & JOAN B        844,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     844300 
50434314210046030 EHRLICH M GORDON TR REMIS FAMILY TR C/O       878,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     878900 
50434314210046040 MUNSTER RITA L & G MUNSTER & LISA TANANBAUM       878,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     878900 
50434314210046050 MUNSTER RITA L        898,232.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1977   3160    1321950 
50434314210046070 MILLER MADGE        632,901.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1977   1983    1014400 
50434314210046080 KARP EILEEN        769,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     769750 
50434314210046090 KIMMEL MARTIN S TRUST KIMMEL MARTIN S TR       812,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     812800 
50434314210046100 KLIGMAN GERALD KLIGMAN JEANNE       812,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     812800 
50434314210046110 STROSBERG DONNY        685,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     769750 
50434314210046120 FLOERSHEIMER DANIEL & BEVERLY        1,014,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1977   1983    1014400 
50434314210046130 MACK DAVID S        605,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6130 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     605900 
50434314210046140 NEUSTADTER DOROTHY        564,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1977   1580     564950 
50434314210046150 ROTHSCHILD RICHARD & BARBARA        591,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1977   1673     591200 
50434314210046160 GOLDMAN RUTH        469,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     469400 
50434314210046170 HURLEY DANIEL T K        105,938.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     469400 
50434314210046180 OCHSTEIN LAWRENCE        256,654.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6180 0400 CONDO 1977   1097     469400 
50434314210046190 KAGAN VLADIMIR        833,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 6190 0400 CONDO 1977   1983     883150 
50434314210050010 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210050020 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210050030 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210050040 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210050050 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210050060 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210050070 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO  0460 CONDO COMM 1977      0          1 
50434314210060010 LEVINE NAOMI        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1977    245      57750 
50434314210060020 SPEKTOR ERYK & MIRA        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1977    187      50400 
50434314210060030 E & R GORDON LLC        63,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1977    302      63000 
50434314210060040 SMITH ERIC S & SANDRA        55,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1977    222      55650 
50434314210060050 SILVER ADRIANNE        55,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1977    222      55650 
50434314210060060 KAGAN VLADIMIR        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1977    245      57750 
50434314210060070 PB 130 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MIDLAND GROUP OF CO INC  C/O       59,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1977    268      59850 
50434314210060080 CHANIN LEONA F 2007 REV TRUST CHANIN LEONA F TRUSTEE       59,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1977    268      59850 
50434314210060090 MELTZER STEVEN        63,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1977    302      63000 
50434314210060100 KATZ STANLEY TR        59,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1977    268      59850 
50434314210060110 BASKIN ARNOLD M & MYRNA F        59,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1977    268      59850 
50434314210060120 KAUFMAN JUDITH W        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1977    245      57750 
50434314210060140 KIMMEL MARTIN S TRUST KIMMEL MARTIN S TR       55,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1977    222      55650 
50434314210060150 TANANBAUM LISA MUNSTER        55,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1977    222      55650 
50434314210060160 SPECTER PATRICIA B        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1977    187      50400 
50434314210060170 ALLEN SELMA B TR        50,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1977    187      50400 
50434314210060180 MUNSTER RITA L        55,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1977    222      55650 
50434314210070010 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314210070020 SUN & SURF ONE HUNDRED THIRTY        0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431421 SUN & SURF 100 & 130 CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1977      0      78750 
50434314220000010 POLSTERER ELIZABETH        4,750,173.00 0.4 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1985 00 05 00 1    1280307       5039       5244       4754                 
50434314220000020 FUSCONE RICHARD M &        5,748,131.00 0.4 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1990 00 05 01 1    2275838       5258       5444       4876                 
50434314220000030 HEINE SANDRA        2,157,387.00 0.4 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1985 00 05 01 2    1721906       6110       6476       5686                 
50434314220000040 ZIMMERMAN HARRIET M        2,308,607.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1987 05 05 00 2    2013718       5953       6401       5504                 
50434314220000050 FINNERAN WILLIAM B        12,473,054.00 0.62 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1980 00 02 00 1      54292        512        512        512                 
50434314220000050 FINNERAN WILLIAM B        12,473,054.00 0.62 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1985 00 07 00 2    3080167       7765       8053       7321                 
50434314220000060 MILAN ASSOCIATES LLC FRANK MURRAY C/O       13,021,083.00 0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1985 00 06 01 2    3643572       9192       9775       8514                 
50434314220000070 LESTER HOWARD & LESTER PATRICIA B       2,047,240.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1985 00 07 00 2    1797067       5312       5567       4755                 
50434314220000080 LINGO BRYCE M        4,776,881.00 0.4 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1985 00 05 00 1    1310119       5166       5410       4682                 
50434314220000090 LEVY ALLYN L ET AL ALLYN L LEVY TR HLDR       2,026,675.00 0.4 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1985 05 05 01 2    1900509       5618       6276       5088                 
50434314220000100 DWECK EDWARD C        1,846,299.00 0.41 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1990 00 05 01 1    1380171       5798       6059       5509                 
50434314230002010 SWIFT THOMAS E III & SWIFT LAURYS P       1,750,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1750350 
50434314230002020 GOLDFARB JUDITH        1,729,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1729350 
50434314230002030 SHINITZKY AMI & JOLLY BARBARA       869,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     869400 
50434314230002040 BLANK SANFORD D        167,334.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     806400 
50434314230002050 MURPHY TERRENCE A        518,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1980    868     518700 
50434314230002060 KALKIN ADAM        774,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     774900 
50434314230002070 LASCHE WILLIAM E        848,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     848400 
50434314230002080 WARREN HENRY HENRY WARREN TR HLDR       166,234.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     774900 
50434314230002090 WEINSTEIN MICHAEL A        837,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     837900 
50434314230002100 VARONA MARIA & MERKLIN SUSAN M       753,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     753900 
50434314230002110 MUELLER LEE ANNE        116,594.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1980    868     481950 
50434314230002120 HOWITT JOANNE I & HOWITT BRUCE H       424,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1980    868     424200 
50434314230003010 GROSS HOWARD A        1,770,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1770350 
50434314230003020 MELIN DAVID & MELIN OLGA       1,749,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1749350 
50434314230003030 FINNEGAN DOROTHY        884,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     884400 
50434314230003040 MCDONOUGH CAROLE G        821,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     821400 
50434314230003050 FRIEDMAN BURTON        528,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1980    868     528700 
50434314230003060 LOGAN THOMAS J TR        784,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     784900 
50434314230003070 GROTH JOHN T & GROTH ELIZABETH S       591,896.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     858400 
50434314230003080 MENDOZA FRANK G EST MENDOZA FRANK G TR       547,583.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     784900 
50434314230003090 GREENSTEIN STEWART A & GREENSTEIN PAMELA W       847,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     847900 
50434314230003100 GORDON NOEL H & GORDON PAULA N       763,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     763900 
50434314230003110 LERNER MARGOT        491,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1980    868     491950 
50434314230003120 LEVINE ARTHUR S & ARLENE        434,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1980    868     434200 
50434314230004010 KEARNEY JOHN K        1,790,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1790350 
50434314230004020 M 55 INC MIGUEL GUZMAN CPA#102 C/O       1,769,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1769350 
50434314230004030 SCOVELL ALAN H        899,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     899400 
50434314230004040 KALKIN JOAN L TR        836,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     836400 
50434314230004050 WOODALL JOAN D        538,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1980    868     538700 
50434314230004060 EDELMAN UNNI F        794,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     794900 
50434314230004070 JOHNSTON JAY A        868,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     868400 
50434314230004080 ARRARTE ERNESTO & VICTORIA        794,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     794900 
50434314230004090 GARFUNKEL GEORGE M & GARFUNKEL SANDRA E       857,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     857900 
50434314230004100 OCONNOR DOUG        586,540.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     773900 
50434314230004110 HILL NICHOLAS A & HILL SILVIA F       501,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1980    868     501950 
50434314230004120 GALLE PHILLIP C &        444,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1980    868     444200 
50434314230005010 JOEL SYLVIA ANN REV TRUST JOEL SYLVIA TRUSTEE       1,810,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1810350 
50434314230005020 NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN CORP REDAC INC -654 C/O       1,789,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1789350 
50434314230005030 FINE MURRAY C & MURRAY MARGARET       634,126.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     914400 
50434314230005040 PRAYIAS JOHN DAVANZO ROBERT TR       624,624.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     851400 
50434314230005050 PAPPAS JAMES A        548,700.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1980    868     548700 
50434314230005060 MATARESE HOLDINGS SA        804,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     804900 
50434314230005070 PAPPAS JAMES A        878,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     878400 
50434314230005080 MARDEL INC SA REDAC INC-652 C/O       804,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     804900 
50434314230005090 OCEAN TOWERS REALTY TRUST EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE C/O       867,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     867900 
50434314230005100 ZALEZNIK ELIZABETH        611,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1980   2263    1173900 
50434314230005110 OCEAN TOWERS REALTY TRUST YOUNG GREGORY E TRUSTEE       511,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1980    868     511950 
50434314230006010 WOODALL JOAN D ORAN D WOODALL TR       1,216,347.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1830350 
50434314230006020 ROONEY ARTHUR J JR & ROONEY KATHLEEN K       1,809,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1980   1830    1809350 
50434314230006030 STERN JEROME L        929,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     929400 
50434314230006040 GRAVY PETER D CHIN PATRICIA L       866,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     866400 
50434314230006050 AZQUETA JUAN J & ANA M F M MARTI C/O       558,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1980    868     558700 
50434314230006060 FINNEGAN DOROTHY J        814,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     814900 
50434314230006070 BIANDA LAURO & BIANDA AREANY       888,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     888400 
50434314230006080 CAMPITELLI JUANITA        814,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     814900 
50434314230006090 RUBINELLI JOSEPH O & MARY JANE        877,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     877900 
50434314230006100 SLEEPER EDWARD L & SLEEPER MERLE L       108,016.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1980   1395     793900 
50434314230006110 OCEAN TOWERS REALTY TRUST YOUNG GREGORY E TRUSTEE       521,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1980    868     521950 
50434314230006120 BERNACCI JEFFREY & BERNACCI CAROLYN       109,119.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1980    868     464200 
50434314230007010 STONE NATALIE G        454,259.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1980   1870    1875300 
50434314230007020 CROWE PHILIP J JR & MAUREEN M        1,290,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1980   1780    1290450 
50434314230007030 FINNEGAN DOROTHY J        420,073.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1980   1780    1269450 
50434314230007040 HARTLEY HARRY J & HARTLEY ARTEMIS H       1,037,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1980   1780    1258950 
50434314230007050 ROMAGNOLA RICHARD &        1,142,998.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1980   1870    1321950 
50434314230010010 STONE NATALIE G        4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010020 CROWE PHILLIP J JR & MAUREEN M        4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010030 MATARESE HOLDINGS SA 1ST NATL PB / PYMT SVCS C/O       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010040 CAMPITELLI JUANITA        4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010050 FINNEGAN DOROTHY J        4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010060 ROMAGNOLA RICHARD & ROMAGNOLA KATHLEEN       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010070 FINNEGAN DOROTHY C        4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010080 HARTLEY HARRY J & HARTLEY ARTEMIS H       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010090 AZQUETA JUAN J & ANA M F M MARTI C/O       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010100 WOODALL C B JR & JOAN D WOODALL       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010110 LEVINE ARTHUR S & ARLENE        4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010120 MARDEL INC SA REDAC INC C/O       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010130 ROONEY ARTHUR J JR & ROONEY KATHLEEN K       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010140 JOEL SYLVIA ANN REV TRUST JOEL SYLVIA TRUSTEE       4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314230010150 ZALEZNIK ELIZABETH        4,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431423 OCEAN TOWERS NORTH CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1980      0       4725 
50434314240001010 METGER HIRSCHMILLER MARY E        424,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980    990     424200 
50434314240001020 BALDWIN NANCY & JOHN C BALDWIN H/W       77,767.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980    990     359100 
50434314240001030 METGER MARY BETH        226,651.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1980    990     359100 
50434314240001040 METGER HIRSCHMILLER MARY E        359,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1980    990     359100 
50434314240001050 KLING BARCLAY C        287,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1980    990     337050 
50434314240001060 DI LONARDO MICHAEL & CARMELA        359,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1980    990     359100 
50434314240001070 GERTLER LARRY &        359,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1980    990     359100 
50434314240001080 BROWN ERIK R        241,429.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1980    990     359100 
50434314240001090 ZAPPONE MARK E        359,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1980    990     359100 
50434314240001100 LAPIDUS ARTHUR M        246,812.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1980    990     424200 
50434314240002010 MCINTOSH F F III DAVIS MARY MCINTOSH       455,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980    990     455700 
50434314240002020 CROSSMAN JAMES A & CROSSMAN MARY B       390,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980    990     390600 
50434314240002030 CROSSMAN JAMES A & CROSSMAN MARY B       390,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1980    990     390600 
50434314240002040 GAVIGAN WILLIAM M & GAVIGAN MOLLIE       390,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1980    990     390600 
50434314240002050 MICHAELS PATRICIA P        317,823.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1980    990     368550 
50434314240002060 BLANK SANFORD D        270,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1980    690     270900 
50434314240002070 WALDMAN BARBARA J        390,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1980    990     390600 
50434314240002080 HULSE R DOUGLAS HULSE R DOUGLAS TR       331,548.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1980    990     390600 
50434314240002090 GOTTWALD FLOYD D JR        390,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1980    990     390600 
50434314240002100 AMOROSO JOAN M        390,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1980    990     390600 
50434314240002110 STERN MARY        263,178.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1980    990     455700 
50434314240003010 LANIGAN CHARLES F        350,552.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980    990     460700 
50434314240003020 FIERST DOROTHY K        395,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980    990     395600 
50434314240003030 CATH NANCY J LIVING TRUST CATH NANCY J TR       395,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1980    990     395600 
50434314240003040 CATH NANCY J TRUST & CATH NANCY J TR       395,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1980    990     395600 
50434314240003050 KILDAY KIERAN J & ROBINSON MELINDA L       373,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1980    990     373550 
50434314240003060 DONEY ROBERT JOSEPH        225,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1980    690     275900 
50434314240003070 SMILEY GRETA        80,590.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1980    990     395600 
50434314240003080 OUGOURLIAN D R & PATRICIA J        395,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1980    990     395600 
50434314240003090 COLLIER DOROTHY J F COLLIER C/O       395,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1980    990     395600 
50434314240003100 MILLER SYLVIA R        395,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1980    990     395600 
50434314240003110 MILLER PAUL E & MILLER NANCY K       460,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1980    990     460700 
50434314240004010 BUTLER HELENA V        295,801.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1980    990     487200 
50434314240004020 SINNOTT OTIS A JR        422,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1980    990     422100 
50434314240004030 DENS RENATE        84,415.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1980    990     422100 
50434314240004040 LEHRER PETER M        422,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1980    990     422100 
50434314240004050 BUSSA ANDREW & ANDREW BUSSA ET AL TR HLDRS       350,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1980    990     400050 
50434314240004060 LEADER JOSHUA M &        422,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1980    990     422100 
50434314240004070 BIG HAT PARTNERS LLC        422,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1980    990     422100 
50434314240004080 SIEBELS JANE        422,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1980    990     422100 
50434314240004090 CASLIN MICHAEL & CASLIN MARY       422,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1980    990     422100 
50434314240004100 ATTEE JOYCE J TR        487,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431424 OCEAN TOWERS SOUTH CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1980    990     487200 
50434314250000010 DUC NHU HOLDINGS INC        3,542,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431425 WARDEN HOUSE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980   5727    3542700 
50434314250000020 REINER EDWARD S TR        1,512,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431425 WARDEN HOUSE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980   2328    1562400 
50434314250000030 ROUSH ADRIA        1,177,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431425 WARDEN HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980   1778    1227450 
50434314250000040 FORSYTHE CARL S III        787,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431425 WARDEN HOUSE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980   1126     787500 
50434314250000050 HAWKSWORTH INC JACOBS ELELLA & KERR C/O       1,283,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431425 WARDEN HOUSE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980   1858    1283100 
50434314250000060 KAY MARCIA C        364,355.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431425 WARDEN HOUSE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980   1782    1241100 
50434314260000010 GOLDFARB JUDITH E        2,374,951.00 0.37 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1990 00 05 01 2    1225358       6042       6803       5555                 
50434314260000020 220 NORTH OCEAN PARTNERS        6,490,103.00 0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 00 05 00 2    1484647       5989       6731       5364                 
50434314260000030 SCHUSTER HEIDI L 1994 TRUST SCHUSTER HEIDI L TRUSTEE       0.00 0.29 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1995 00 04 01 2     567297       4834       5414       4105                 
50434314260000040 GOLDBLUM NORMAN P & GOLDBLUM SIMONE S       1,243,451.00 0.29 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 06 00 2     863625       5014       5536       4567                 
50434314260000050 WARD CHARLES & WARD DONNA       3,348,274.00 0.29 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 03 04 00 2     911290       5623       6038       5188                 
50434314260000061 TIMMINS MARY J & MARY JOANNE TIMMINS C/O       1,153,110.00 0.29 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 00 03 00 3     754903       5452       5918       4898                 
50434314280000010 HOWARD HAL B HOWARD HAL B TR       605,227.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431428 BIENESTAR CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1987   2340    1044750 
50434314280000020 CLEMENS ROSEMARY A        1,106,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431428 BIENESTAR CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1987   2491    1106700 
50434314280000030 COLLINS SHEILA S H COLLINS C/O       838,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431428 BIENESTAR CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1987   1834     838950 
50434314280000040 WHITE SUZANNE        1,132,440.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431428 BIENESTAR CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1987   2701    1205400 
50434314280000050 LUCKOFF ELLIOTT S TRUST LUCKOFF ELLIOTT S TR       947,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431428 BIENESTAR CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1987   2108     947100 
50434314280000060 YASEEN ROGER YASEEN ROGER TR       953,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431428 BIENESTAR CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1987   2127     953400 
50434314290000010 SCHOTT LEWIS M SCHOTT LEWIS M TR       4,361,490.00 0.76 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 01 00 1     106297        914       1026        866                 
50434314290000010 SCHOTT LEWIS M SCHOTT LEWIS M TR       4,361,490.00 0.76 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 07 00 2    3591098      10492      11808       9230                 
50434314290000020 228 LAS BRISAS CORP        9,993,429.00 1 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 08 00 2    4196148      13653      16099      10789                 
50434314290000040 SILVERMAN HENRY R TR        6,718,217.00 0.49 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 06 00 2    2995162       7958       8859       7186                 
50434314290000050 TIEFEL WILLIAM H & THE 236 VIA LAS BRISAS TRUST       6,221,643.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 06 01 2    3887111       8290       9776       7260                 
50434314290000060 FROMSTEIN LITA        5,211,047.00 0.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 04 01 1    1557013       5262       5889       4441                 
50434314290000070 DIMINO FRANK        5,468,103.00 0.46 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 03 03 03 2    2871188       7139       8330       6276                 
50434314290000081 HAIG ALEXANDER P JR & HAIG PATRICIA       7,744,052.00 0.5827 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 00 1    4272180      10055      11624       9141                 
50434314290000082 GOLDMAN MARK & GOLDMAN DIANE S       6,439,146.00 0.459 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 05 06 02     2727254       8888      10216       7886                 
50434314290000100 STEIN MICHAEL        3,487,965.00 0.62 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 03 05 00 1    2429175       6936       8182       5757                 
50434314290000110 MILLER PRISCILLA C MILLER DONALD K TR       6,518,666.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 07 00 2    3078449       7475       8864       6645                 
50434314290000120 THEODORACOPULOS HARRY & THEODORACOPULOS GAIL       5,122,286.00 0.52 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 1    2857005       7113       7987       6352                 
50434314290000130 BURNS BRIAN P        3,874,830.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 06 00 2    2283147       7142       8148       6404                 
50434314290000140 WERNER VIOLET VIOLET WERNER TR TITL HLDR       4,968,545.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 05 01 1    1627795       5873       6738       5144                 
50434314290000150 BRINKER NANCY        3,379,136.00 0.47 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 06 01 1    2121797       6505       7010       5831                 
50434314290000160 OURISMAN FLORENZ R        4,247,749.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 00 1    1093656       5305       5878       4558                 
50434314290000170 SWANSON DAN E & SWANSON KAREN W       5,251,847.00 1.3319 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1950 00 01 00 2      23969       1518       2100        843                 
50434314290000170 SWANSON DAN E & SWANSON KAREN W       5,251,847.00 1.3319 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1960 02 01 00 1      22906       1431       1474       1442                 
50434314290000190 VICTOR ROYALL III & WENDY F VICTOR       4,110,255.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 01 2    2906809       9109       9601       8360                 
50434314290000200 PIZZAGALLI JAMES C & PIZZAGALLI JUDITH R       3,680,000.00 0.45 VACANT                           
50434314290000210 HENDERSON CHARLES F & HENDERSON MARY L       3,329,409.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 04 04 01 1    1550395       6175       6770       5444                 
50434314290000220 FITERMAN SHIRLEY SHIRLEY FITERMAN ET AL TR HLDR       3,107,211.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 00 1    1936761       6618       7047       6084                 
50434314290000230 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,748,976.00 0.54 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1950 00 02 00 1      68976       1201       1254        990                 
50434314290000240 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,680,000.00 0.43 VACANT                           
50434314290000250 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,680,000.00 0.5 VACANT                           
50434314290000260 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,680,000.00 0.54 VACANT                           
50434314290000270 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,680,000.00 0.5 VACANT                           
50434314290000280 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,680,000.00 0.51 VACANT                           
50434314290000290 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       5,597,154.00 0.6 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1973 00 07 01 2    1751266      10292      10870       9532                 
50434314290000290 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       5,597,154.00 0.6 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 01 00 2     142487       1950       2539        576                 
50434314290000300 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,680,000.00 0.61 VACANT                           
50434314290000310 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,680,000.00 0.5 VACANT                           
50434314290000320 CASA CAJCO INC CHAMBERLAIN & STEWARD ASSOC LTD       3,797,926.00 0.54 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 01 00 1     117926       1291       2705        882                 
50434314290010000 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.07 MUNICIPAL                           
50434314290020000 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.32 MUNICIPAL                           
50434314290030000 PHIPPS ESTATES HMOWNERS ASSN C/O LIST MANAGEMENT       0.00 1.73 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434314290040000 PHIPPS ESTATES HMOWNERS ASSN C/O LIST MANAGEMENT       0.00 0.77 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 1      53757        522        808        400                 
50434314290040000 PHIPPS ESTATES HMOWNERS ASSN C/O LIST MANAGEMENT       0.00 0.77 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 1      81110        822       1108        700                 
50434314290070000 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.37 RIVERS/LAKES                           
50434315000010010 LEVIN STEPHEN A        9,566,536.00 1.39 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 05 10 00 2    4023064      13121      15103      11481                 
50434315000010050 HARLAN LEONARD M        7,979,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 2000 05 05 01 2     834181       4549       4967       3756                 
50434315000010050 HARLAN LEONARD M        7,979,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 2007 00 01 00 1     136979       1741       2050       1019                 
50434315000010070 BRONFMAN CHARLES R        18,504,744.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 05 07 00 2     655039       8546      10179       7144                 
50434315000010080 HOROWITZ KENNETH A HOROWITZ KENNETH A TR       9,245,576.00 1 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 11 01 2    4273102      19622      25882      16712                 
50434315000010090 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.27 MUNICIPAL           1983 1983 0003 01 2 FIRE RESIS     165790       1500         
50434315000040010 MACARTHUR JOHN D & CATHERINE FOUNDATION        300.00 0.01 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434315000040030 PARC REGENT COND ASSN INC        0.00 1.07 RIVERS/LAKES                           
50434315010000010 HOWE ELEANOR L        440,809.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1985 03 03 00 1     204080       2590       3271       2127                 
50434315010000020 PAULL HAROLD C JR & JOANNE R PAULL JOANNE R       842,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 05 06 00 1     532697       4876       5269       4477                 
50434315010000030 DUNNAN BRUCE B & DUNNAN WENDY W       5,637,700.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1985 04 04 01 2    1103414       5222       5913       4804                 
50434315010000040 DIZNEY DONALD R & DIZNEY IRENE S       5,595,917.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 03 04 03 2    1023356       5613       6175       5047                 
50434315010000050 WEISS HOWARD A HAMBY LOUIS L III TR TITL HLDR       1,557,706.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 04 00 2     452419       3535       3749       3260                 
50434315020000010 THREE TWENTY DUNBAR LLC        6,029,484.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1970 03 03 01 1     304219       3820       4138       3444                 
50434315020000020 SULTAN MARILYN R        4,497,890.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1961 05 05 01 2      37734       7207       7699       6518                 
50434315020000030 GURRENTZ MARTIN A GURRENTZ MARTIN A TR       741,373.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1980 03 03 01 1     196654       3948       4367       3403                 
50434315020000040 SMALL PHYLLIS & ROSENWEIG SUZETTA S       1,330,798.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1975 03 02 00 1     175287       2386       2709       2247                 
50434315020000050 HERMA HOLDINGS S C INC        1,263,495.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1970 02 02 00 1     108797       1607       1782       1512                 
50434315030000051 SLSW ENTERPRISES LLC        1,335,961.00 0 OFFICE 1 STORY           1958 1997 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     386200       3798         
50434315030000080 KAUPE SANDRA T        1,105,982.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 01 01 00 1      18984       1030       1114        974                 
50434315030000100 HOLLAND RAYMOND E &        3,003,857.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 05 01 2    1441862       5429       5746       4853                 
50434315030000140 SIMON JANE J        656,812.00 0.12 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 03 04 01 2     836197       3242       3394       2925                 
50434315030000160 SHENGOLD KENNETH & JANICE        1,929,854.00 0.12 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 03 04 01 2     834821       3237       3389       2920                 
50434315030000180 246 ATLANTIC AVENUE LLC        1,413,475.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 04 03 01 2     204428       3516       3561       3432                 
50434315030000210 ROFKIND J LEE ET AL        1,089,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1960 00 01 00 1       2659        910        924        888                 
50434315030000230 LOT 23 25 ORANGE GROVE PARK LLC        2,245,077.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    1049645       4278       4420       3972                 
50434315030000420 254 NORTH COUNTY LLC        1,751,701.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434315030000440 SULLIVAN MELISSA        1,628,390.00 0.1494 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2     734762       3791       4146       3421                 
50434315030000461 GREENFIELD RICHARD D & GREENFIELD MARGUERITE G       1,709,848.00 0.1491 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2     773716       3993       4286       3639                 
50434315030000491 HOSTYN PETER R HOSTYN PETER R TR       552,116.00 0.2296 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 00 04 00 1      43510       2423       2706       1692                 
50434315030000580 MADDOCK PAUL L JR TRUSTEE & BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FLORIDA TR       1,449,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434315030000610 DREXEL NOREEN STONER TRUST DREXEL NOREEN STONER TRUSTEE       1,914,344.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1954 1965 04 04 00 2     188156       3429       4104       3080                 
50434315030000650 SHERWOOD FRAN        406,784.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1917 1995 01 01 00 1     208930       1311       1359       1104                 
50434315030000660 SUMMERS RUTH A        1,400,546.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 2000 00 04 00 2     293155       2685       2822       2512                 
50434315030000680 LAWRENCE C EUGENE & LINDA LAWRENCE LINDA       496,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 03 02 01 2     307322       3350       3861       2889                 
50434315030000710 STEWART ANDREW H & STEWART CATHERINE M       1,257,143.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1970 00 03 00 2     161731       2300       2344       2266                 
50434315030000730 BERGMANN PAOLO TR        1,162,284.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 03 03 01 2      75534       2883       3120       2824                 
50434315030000750 251 BRADLEY PLACE LLC        1,532,250.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1956 1975 0006 01 1 WOOD FRAME     152250       4320         
50434315040000041 MAURER GILBERT C & MAURER ANN E       964,881.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 05 05 01 2    1009824       3582       3708       3288                 
50434315040000042 INGBER LAWRENCE K INGBER LAWRENCE K TR       1,651,241.00 0.12 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 05 05 01 2    1009824       3582       3708       3288                 
50434315040000110 DUCOTE WAYNE & DUCOTE DIANE       2,197,600.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 2000 03 04 01 2    1513821       3705       3851       3379                 
50434315040000121 KOBLITZ MICHAEL J        1,882,139.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 03 04 01 2    1236325       3479       3684       3127                 
50434315040000131 GORDON STANLEY W GORDON STANLEY W TR       2,090,692.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1990 03 04 01 2    1356644       3705       3851       3379                 
50434315040000141 TURNER SUE        629,900.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 03 04 01 2    1236325       3479       3684       3127                 
50434315040000151 BRADLEY PLACE        2,262,661.00 0.25 OFF MULTISTORY           1987 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     926390       5800         
50434315040000152 FARBER ANTJE        1,893,830.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 03 04 01 2    1236325       3479       3684       3127                 
50434315040000153 STEVENSON BORDEN W STEVENSON BORDEN W TR       769,532.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 03 04 01 2    1316490       3705       3851       3379                 
50434315050000011 THREE PEARLS LLC        1,314,538.00 0.126 STORE/OFF/RES           1928 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     489690       5053         
50434315050000012 LYNN GEORGE L        584,679.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1958 1965 02 02 00 2      88354       1482       1498       1458                 
50434315050000020 ALEXANDER VIOLET R        255,017.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 03 02 00 2     136141       2118       2236       1874                 
50434315050000040 BROWN GRACE G        349,720.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1955 1970 00 02 00 2      79180       1439       1544       1404                 
50434315050000060 TALBOT SHARON P TR        780,561.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1926 1940 04 04 00 2      21561       5597       5980       5371                 
50434315050000090 JJNK HOLDINGS LLC        985,202.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1955 2000 04 04 00 2     210842       2866       2892       2860                 
50434315050000120 PBOC INC        603,750.00 0 VACANT                           
50434315050000140 PBOC INC        688,099.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1955 1970 02 02 00 2      84349       1228       1260       1200                 
50434315050000160 PBOC INC        654,509.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1955 1970 02 02 00 2      79509       1228       1260       1200                 
50434315050000180 PBOC INC        660,120.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1955 1960 03 02 00 2      85120       1485       1514       1458                 
50434315050000200 PETROU MARINA G        872,319.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1955 1965 04 04 00 2     119069       2478       2712       2400                 
50434315050000230 SCHWAB MARY L TR        146,809.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 01 00 1      66272        924        938        918                 
50434315050000250 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 0 RELIGIOUS                           
50434315060000010 ARNOLD TROY G JR        1,006,922.00 0 SERVICE SHOPS           1967 1967 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      98980       2262         
50434315060000031 BAGBY JOSEPH R ET AL TRS        651,754.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 04 04 00 2      76754       1586       1688       1464                 
50434315060000032 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1965 00 02 00 2     166688       2446       2568       2130                 
50434315060000040 CBRS REALTY LTD STEVEN FRIEDMAN C/O       816,273.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1945 00 03 01 2      63333       1037       1122       1000                 
50434315060000040 CBRS REALTY LTD STEVEN FRIEDMAN C/O       816,273.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 03 01 2     177940       2802       3008       2680                 
50434315060000050 DUNWOODY EQUITY CORP        671,943.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1955 1955 00 03 00 2      78836       1464       1492       1452                 
50434315060000060 SEMINOLE EQUITY CORP        1,190,287.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1960 04 05 00 2      37296       3368       3592       3090                 
50434315060000080 PBOC INC        701,935.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 2002 2002 00 02 00 2     125321       1474       1474       1474                 
50434315060000110 BINTER LLC        1,318,970.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1952 1970 04 04 00 2     168970       3064       3226       2718                 
50434315060000130 SKEADAS PETER J &        768,544.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1940 00 01 00 2      30985        574        732        366                 
50434315060000130 SKEADAS PETER J &        768,544.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 00 02 00 2     133809       2084       2320       1926                 
50434315060000140 OLEANDER VENTURES LLC        748,183.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1928 00 03 01 2      42726       1037       1122       1000                 
50434315060000140 OLEANDER VENTURES LLC        748,183.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1928 02 02 00 2     130457       2810       3008       2680                 
50434315060000180 KILVERT CHARLES A III & KILVERT EMILY H       1,899,248.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1976 2004 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     787700       3324         
50434315070000060 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0.93 RELIGIOUS           1972 1972 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     397410       6331         
50434315070000060 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0.93 RELIGIOUS           1972 1972 0002 01 1 WOOD FRAME     543210       8320         
50434315070000060 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0.93 RELIGIOUS           1996 1996 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      41210        720         
50434315080000011 BAGBY JOSEPH R TR & BAGBY MARTHA G TR       671,210.00 0.0925 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1955 00 04 00 2      96081       1847       1940       1836                 
50434315080000021 BAGBY JOSEPH R TR & BAGBY MARTHA G TR       664,808.00 0.0704 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1955 00 04 00 2      89808       1693       1780       1674                 
50434315080000032 GIGUERE ANGELA & KUMBLE STEVEN J       500,386.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 03 02 01 2     160652       1900       1937       1687                 
50434315080000050 FINFROCK DALE B & HELEN H FINFROCK HELEN H       235,858.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 03 02 00 2     208378       2801       2923       2771                 
50434315080000060 DUNWOODY EQUITY CORP        751,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1970 02 02 00 2     147919       1513       1578       1458                 
50434315080000070 JUMAPAO JOSEPH P & OTHELIA P JUMAPAO ET AL       389,901.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1959 1970 02 02 00 2      99054       1513       1578       1458                 
50434315080000081 PROPHET DOUG        449,995.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 1      13009        180        180        180                 
50434315080000081 PROPHET DOUG        449,995.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 02 02 00 2     144350       1687       1687       1687                 
50434315080000082 HEGER G RAIMUND & FRANZISKA HEGER FRANZISKA       162,721.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      11968        180        180        180                 
50434315080000082 HEGER G RAIMUND & FRANZISKA HEGER FRANZISKA       162,721.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 02 02 00 2     139255       1687       1687       1687                 
50434315080000091 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.12 MUNICIPAL                           
50434315080000110 HICKS CAROLYN R & GEORGE RUSSELL H/W       199,410.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 03 03 01 2     168859       2737       2737       2737                 
50434315080000120 PARK EQUITY CORP        775,118.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1950 00 01 00 1      21314        342        428        214                 
50434315080000120 PARK EQUITY CORP        775,118.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 02 00 2     149670       2116       2116       2116                 
50434315080000130 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        15,618.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 2      16062        404        404        404                 
50434315080000130 TEMPLE EMANUEL OF PALM BEACH INC        15,618.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 03 02 00 2     159696       2393       2406       2388                 
50434315080000141 MEAGHER FRANCIS J & MEAGHER ALMA D       691,478.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 02 00 2      87728       1470       1611       1347                 
50434315080000142 OHARA EDWARD F & OHARA EILEEN M       414,210.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 02 02 00 2     107953       1495       1508       1424                 
50434315080000151 DOUGLAS L WILSON        298,997.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 02 00 2     173258       2334       2390       2305                 
50434315080000170 MURPHY ELIZABETH S        362,939.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 2      93715       1390       1830       1280                 
50434315080000180 WILKEY JERRY V & WILKEY SARI M       544,532.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1900 1980 04 04 00 3     199154       2984       2984       2984                 
50434315080000190 BRADLEY PARK REAL ESTATE LLC        844,590.00 0 OFFICE 1 STORY           1932 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     298590       2145         
50434315080000350 BILTMORE GALLERIA LLC        1,838,396.00 0 FINANCIAL           1980 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     573760       3038         
50434315080000380 BIANDA LAURO &        603,750.00 0 VACANT                           
50434315080000390 GUSTAVSON TROY &        752,538.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 03 02 00 2     148788       1275       1397       1222                 
50434315080000400 BYRD SUSAN E        462,037.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1988 03 02 00 2     171269       1922       2040       1872                 
50434315080000410 BEANE GILDA E & G L BEANE BEANE G L BEANE       380,630.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1950 00 02 00 2      70804       1760       1948       1728                 
50434315080000420 NASSER RHONDA H & MODESITT CHARLES &       165,093.00 0.08 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1970 03 02 00 2     160417       2742       2844       2578                 
50434315080000430 PARK AVENUE PALM BEACH LLC JONES FOSTER SERVICE LLC C/O       2,283,080.00 0.16 MOTEL           1925 1975 0029 01 1 WOOD FRAME     398080      12141         
50434315080000450 HEAP RUTHANN L J HEAP RUTHANN L J TR       612,463.00 0.12 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 03 02 01 2     349371       2566       2664       2340                 
50434315080000462 SCHEINER MOSHE E & SCHEINER NECHAMA D       532,135.00 0.12 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1990 03 02 01 2     405746       2918       3016       2692                 
50434315080000480 A & E PROPERTIES LLC        758,032.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1978 03 03 01 2     154282       2112       2112       2112                 
50434315080000491 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 04 04 00 2     644512       5327       6444       4630                 
50434315080000491 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 01 01 2     245678       2736       3000       2120                 
50434315080000500 TIITF STATE OF FLORIDA DEP C/O       0.00 0 STATE                           
50434315090000100 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0 RELIGIOUS                           
50434315090000131 RENSOR REALTY CORP CARLYLE MGMT CORP C/O       1,626,388.00 0 SPRMKT/DRUG STR           1965 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     335210       4811         
50434315090000132 SALAMANDER PALM BEACH LLC        2,216,983.00 0 SPRMKT/DRUG STR           1948 2007 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     954440       6308         
50434315090000140 PARAMOUNT CHURCH INC LESSOR NON PROFIT GROUPS LESSEES       2,820,623.00 1.36 STORE/OFF/RES           1926 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2700960      35992         
50434315100000230 BARBARITO GERALD M DD JCL BISHOP OF DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH       0.00 0 RELIGIOUS           1928 1968 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1130660      13190         
50434315100000460 BILTMORE GALLERIA LLC        3,923,260.00 0 STORES           1980 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     428850       5850         
50434315100000460 BILTMORE GALLERIA LLC        3,923,260.00 0 STORES           1980 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     489000       7707         
50434315100000540 BILTMORE GALLERIA LLC        2,796,086.00 0 FINANCIAL           1991 1991 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     477330       3225         
50434315100000560 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC REAL ESTATE TAX DEPT C/O       3,700,000.00 1.3 SPRMKT/DRUG STR                           
50434315100000601 WACHOVIA BANK        1,979,556.00 0.34 FINANCIAL           1979 1979 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     321940       2176         
50434315100000701 SUNSET AVENUE CORP        2,012,898.00 0 PKG LT / MH PK                           
50434315100000750 PALM BEACH HOTEL        3,500,000.00 0.5716 STORES           1997 1997 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1671730       7465         
50434315100000810 BANK OF AMERICA        5,216,757.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      25580         84         
50434315100000810 BANK OF AMERICA        5,216,757.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2436560      15476         
50434315100000870 BARNETT BANK PALM BEACH COUNTY ATTN: REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS       2,854,029.00 0.46 FINANCIAL           1950 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     637190       6253         
50434315220000010 CASEY JOHN J TR & CASEY CAROL TR       129,982.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1322     507150 
50434315220000020 MASSOUMI ROSHAN        409,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968   1067     408450 
50434315220000030 MCINERNEY PATRICE S        508,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1322     507150 
50434315220000040 ODONNELL LESLIE        128,661.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1322     512150 
50434315220000050 VIATOR DARIA A        68,041.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968   1067     413450 
50434315220000060 LASMEZAS CORINNE I        462,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1322     512150 
50434315220000070 ARNOLD GRACE W        132,998.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1968   1440     533400 
50434315220000080 STOLL SUZANNE        321,899.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1968   1503     548100 
50434315220000090 MASON MARK & KRON ISABELLA       533,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1968   1440     533400 
50434315220000100 HELFRICH JOSEPH III & MEEHAN BRIDGET       539,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1968   1440     538400 
50434315220000110 BIEL HOWARD S & RENE TRUST BIEL HOWARD S TRUSTEE &       553,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1968   1503     553100 
50434315220000120 JAMES DAWN A        132,998.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431522 FRENCH VILLAS OF PALM BCH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1968   1440     538400 
50434315230002010 HERTZ NATALIE M        483,880.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   3041    1785000 
50434315230002020 MANNING LYNNE        2,018,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2984    2068500 
50434315230002030 BLACKMAN RENA        2,235,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1980   3036    2235450 
50434315230003010 LEVY SHIRLEY F LEVY SHIRLEY F TR       761,456.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   3041    1890000 
50434315230003020 BERMAN MARILYN        1,156,786.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2984    2226000 
50434315230003030 LEVIN ELISABETH        2,445,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1980   3036    2445450 
50434315230004010 LEIB ALDEN M & JULIE SOSIN TR TITL HLDR       1,412,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1980   3041    1910000 
50434315230004020 ABRAMSON ALBERT TR        2,256,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1980   2984    2256000 
50434315230004030 GURWIN JOSEPH        1,779,654.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1980   3036    2495450 
50434315230005010 R S H FL LTD        1,930,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1980   3041    1930000 
50434315230005020 ALBERN HOLDINGS INC W B HERMAN C/O       2,286,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1980   2984    2286000 
50434315230005030 BOAS MARJORIE M        2,545,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1980   3036    2545450 
50434315230006010 ABRAMSON ALBERT TR        1,950,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1980   3041    1950000 
50434315230006020 EPPLER HEINZ        670,729.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1980   2984    2316000 
50434315230006030 MEYER EDWARD H &        2,595,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431523 NUMBER ONE NORTH OCEAN CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1980   3036    2595450 
50434315240000010 FERTEL ALVIN H & LORETTA FERTEL LORETTA       44,993.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0010 0400 CONDO 1978    765     367000 
50434315240000020 MCGRATH EILEEN M        367,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0020 0400 CONDO 1978    765     367000 
50434315240000030 ROSCELLO ERNESTINE M        37,417.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0030 0400 CONDO 1978    646     272000 
50434315240000040 BROWN DARLENE E        272,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0040 0400 CONDO 1978    646     272000 
50434315240000050 2600 PORTOFINO LLC        272,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0050 0400 CONDO 1978    646     272000 
50434315240000060 LEY WHITNEY        222,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0060 0400 CONDO 1978    646     272000 
50434315240000070 MCCORMICK MATTHEW B        302,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0070 0400 CONDO 1978    646     302000 
50434315240000080 CARR CAROL L        37,417.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431524 ATLANTIC PALMS CONDO *** 0080 0400 CONDO 1978    646     302000 
50434315250000011 PEARSON DONNA B        226,644.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431525 FRENCH NORMANDY CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1978   2029     819000 
50434315250000012 GOLLEHER JAMES H & SANDRA TRS        819,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431525 FRENCH NORMANDY CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1978   2029     819000 
50434315250000013 CHRISTLIEB ETONELLA &        267,892.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431525 FRENCH NORMANDY CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1978   2029     819000 
50434315250000020 DONAGHUE LOUIS F TR        736,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431525 FRENCH NORMANDY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1978   1887     736050 
50434315250000030 MINSKY LYNNE        704,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431525 FRENCH NORMANDY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1978   1807     704550 
50434315250000040 WILESMITH MARGARET        222,549.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431525 FRENCH NORMANDY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1978   1961     764400 
50434315260000012 SEGALL ELIZABETH G &        367,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1979    953     425250 
50434315260000013 MEENAN DANIEL C TR        430,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1979    953     430250 
50434315260000014 CAHILL PATRICIA        435,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1979    953     435250 
50434315260000021 KATZ MICHAEL J        212,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1979    515     212100 
50434315260000022 TAGATZ GLENN E LANDKAMER MARY J       56,498.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1979    804     368550 
50434315260000023 TRAYBAR JOSEPH J        144,888.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1979    804     373550 
50434315260000024 DEFRANCES DONNA        146,309.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1979    804     378550 
50434315260000032 HOSTYN PETER R TR        425,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1979    953     425250 
50434315260000033 MORAN JOSEPH K & MORAN JUDITH E       153,156.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1979    953     430250 
50434315260000034 YELICH GEORGE TR        435,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1979    953     435250 
50434315260000042 PETRITZ-FRAUNGRUBER DARINKA TR        425,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1979    953     425250 
50434315260000043 BRAMS HARRIET        152,656.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1979    953     430250 
50434315260000044 HYMAN DAVID A WIBBELSMAN CHARLES J       435,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1979    953     435250 
50434315260000052 KUBON HORST F FAMILY TRUST        368,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1979    804     368550 
50434315260000053 MALLARD HERBERT K        373,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1979    804     373550 
50434315260000054 AINSLIE MICHAEL & AINSLIE SUZANNE       378,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1979    804     378550 
50434315260000062 NORTH VANDA A        59,217.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1979    953     425250 
50434315260000063 CARR CAROL L        430,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1979    953     430250 
50434315260000064 SKOV JETTE L        435,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431526 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1979    953     435250 
50434315270000101 SHILLER BRYANT & SHILLER LILLIAN       989,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0101 0400 CONDO 1980   2251     989100 
50434315270000102 WEINSTEIN RICHARD        187,671.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0102 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     830550 
50434315270000103 ROSENZWEIG ISRAEL &        487,622.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0103 0400 CONDO 1980   1568    1143450 
50434315270000104 SMALL PHYLLIS &        735,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0104 0400 CONDO 1980   1444     977550 
50434315270000105 SIEGEL JOAN JOAN SIEGEL TRHLDR       328,573.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0105 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1229550 
50434315270000106 MICHAAN JOSEPH & MICHAAN SUZANNE       728,092.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0106 0400 CONDO 1980   4191    3286500 
50434315270000107 ELLIS CHARLOTTE G        153,632.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0107 0400 CONDO 1980   1610     584850 
50434315270000109 FURMAN ROY L        4,138,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0109 0400 CONDO 1980   4349    4138050 
50434315270000111 CALLARI FELIX F & CALLARI SYLVIA S       1,229,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0111 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1229550 
50434315270000112 SMALL PHYLLIS &        951,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0112 0400 CONDO 1980   1444     951300 
50434315270000113 GATES HELENE P TRUST 2005 HELENE P GATES TR       807,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0113 0400 CONDO 1980   1844     807450 
50434315270000114 MONTONEN ANTERO        110,765.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0114 0400 CONDO 1980   1245     478800 
50434315270000115 WOLOFSKY MOIRA        2,507,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0115 0400 CONDO 1980   6378    3057600 
50434315270000201 HIRSCH CYNTHIA B        999,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0201 0400 CONDO 1980   2251     999100 
50434315270000202 SULTANIK KALMAN & SULTANIK BRONIA       840,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0202 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     840550 
50434315270000203 BRODSKY LYNN W        1,153,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0203 0400 CONDO 1980   1568    1153450 
50434315270000204 RISIN LIZA        1,003,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0204 0400 CONDO 1980   1444    1003800 
50434315270000205 APPLEBY MABEL APPLEBY MABEL TR       240,320.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0205 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1402800 
50434315270000206 HODROFF LEO A & HODROFF DORIS C       2,572,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0206 0400 CONDO 1980   2613    2572500 
50434315270000207 DUNWORTH R LAWRENCE        2,685,955.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0207 0400 CONDO 1980   4553    3558450 
50434315270000209 FINKELSTEIN ALBERT & FINKELSTEIN ANN B       514,327.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0209 0400 CONDO 1980   3315    2941050 
50434315270000210 HEYMAN SAMUEL J & HEYMAN RONNIE F       2,192,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1980   2472    2192400 
50434315270000211 HEYMAN SAMUEL J &        2,853,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0211 0400 CONDO 1980   3216    2853900 
50434315270000212 KFF TRUST & BOSSIN ALLEN TR       2,887,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0212 0400 CONDO 1980   2613    2887500 
50434315270000213 RAPAPORTE RENEE        1,402,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0213 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1402800 
50434315270000214 ROSENBAND PHILLIP A & ROSENBAND SANDEE       869,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0214 0400 CONDO 1980   1444     919800 
50434315270000215 ROSENBAND PHILIP        827,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0215 0400 CONDO 1980   1844     827450 
50434315270000216 HEYMAN SAMUEL J & HEYMAN RONNIE F       488,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0216 0400 CONDO 1980   1245     488800 
50434315270000301 LAPPIN DOROTHY LAPPIN DOROTHY TR       601,820.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0301 0400 CONDO 1980   2251    1009100 
50434315270000302 LANSING JAMES & LANSING ANN       932,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0302 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     932400 
50434315270000303 CRISSES ANDREW M & CRISSES ABBY C       1,169,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0303 0400 CONDO 1980   1568    1169700 
50434315270000304 HAUSER EDUARDO        1,028,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0304 0400 CONDO 1980   1444    1028800 
50434315270000305 MINSKOFF CAROLYN        1,427,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0305 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1427800 
50434315270000306 LEVINE IRVING & LEVINE BERNICE       837,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0306 0400 CONDO 1980   1438     837900 
50434315270000307 ACEVEDO ALEXANDER &        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0307 0400 CONDO 1980   1152     619500 
50434315270000308 PEARL TARA E        1,201,064.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0308 0400 CONDO 1980   2059    1369200 
50434315270000310 AMINI DAVID & AMINI DORA       837,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1980   1438     837900 
50434315270000311 KRAMER HAROLD & KRAMER ADELINE       1,427,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0311 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1427800 
50434315270000312 FEUER GINGER        275,416.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0312 0400 CONDO 1980   1444     939800 
50434315270000313 THYLAN LENARD        907,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0313 0400 CONDO 1980   1568     907200 
50434315270000314 HUIJZER RUDOLF A & HUIJZER WISSE HENDRIKA       515,460.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0314 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     862050 
50434315270000315 PESENTI BERNICE F PESENTI BERNICE F TR       259,168.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0315 0400 CONDO 1980   2251    1009100 
50434315270000316 APPLEGATE TISSIERE GRACE        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0316 0400 CONDO 1980   1152     619500 
50434315270000401 LEAF AURELL H & LEAF CECILIA       288,194.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0401 0400 CONDO 1980   2280    1380750 
50434315270000402 SCHWARTZ LOUISE LOUISE SCHWARTZ QUAL PERS RES TRUST       144,003.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0402 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     952400 
50434315270000403 RAPAPORTE RENEE &        1,195,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0403 0400 CONDO 1980   1522    1195950 
50434315270000404 BAKER SYLVIA        865,610.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0404 0400 CONDO 1980   1444    1053800 
50434315270000405 HYMAN BARBARA        230,588.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0405 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1452800 
50434315270000406 TSAI NANCY R        1,196,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0406 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1246350 
50434315270000407 JAVITS ERIC M & MORGAN STANLEY TR TITL HLDR       1,305,254.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0407 0400 CONDO 1980   2161    2136750 
50434315270000408 KOEPPEL JEAN & KOEPPEL WILLIAM W       1,514,801.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0408 0400 CONDO 1980   1914    1929900 
50434315270000409 ALLAN ROBB A & ALLAN SARA M       936,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0409 0400 CONDO 1980   4075    3772650 
50434315270000411 OSTEN BERNARD & OSTEN RENEE       1,246,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0411 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1246350 
50434315270000412 GOULD CALVIN C & GOULD HARRIET R       240,363.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0412 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1452800 
50434315270000413 CHERNER HARVEY & CHERNER ARLENE       762,928.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0413 0400 CONDO 1980   1444     959800 
50434315270000414 RICHTER PHYLISS A        537,208.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0414 0400 CONDO 1980   1568     917200 
50434315270000415 SEDER STEPHEN P TR & FREEHLING SUSAN       872,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0415 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     872050 
50434315270000416 ABRAHAM S DANIEL        1,450,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0416 0400 CONDO 1980   2298    1450050 
50434315270000501 LEVINSON BERNICE S        474,138.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0501 0400 CONDO 1980   2280    1400750 
50434315270000502 KILLIAN EMILY P        195,774.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0502 0400 CONDO 1980   1516    1054200 
50434315270000503 SCHONBRUNN ALBERT & SCHONBRUNN GERTRUDE       234,910.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0503 0400 CONDO 1980   1568    1222200 
50434315270000504 KAUFMAN GEORGE S & KAUFMAN MARIA Z       1,078,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0504 0400 CONDO 1980   1444    1078800 
50434315270000505 MURSTEIN ALVIN S & MURSTEIN AILEEN F       1,477,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0505 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1477800 
50434315270000506 PRAWER MARILYN S        689,447.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0506 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1298850 
50434315270000507 BARNESS AMNON &        2,509,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0507 0400 CONDO 1980   2161    2509500 
50434315270000508 LEWINSTEIN STEPHEN THE WAVES       1,782,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0508 0400 CONDO 1980   1929    1782900 
50434315270000509 ROSE HELEN C ROSE STUART M TR       266,746.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0509 0400 CONDO 1980   1929    1782900 
50434315270000510 GREENBERG HAROLD & GREENBERG SYLVIA       1,687,702.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0510 0400 CONDO 1980   2161    2052750 
50434315270000511 ROTHSTEIN RAPHAEL & ROTHSTEIN SHELLEY       689,447.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0511 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1298850 
50434315270000512 LEIBOWITZ SHAWN        1,477,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0512 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1477800 
50434315270000513 OHARE DEAN R & OHARE KATHLEEN T       979,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0513 0400 CONDO 1980   1444     979800 
50434315270000514 ALLEGRA MARISA I        927,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0514 0400 CONDO 1980   1568     927200 
50434315270000515 WEINBERG GERALD & WEINBERG ANNE       882,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0515 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     882050 
50434315270000516 WYNER ROBERT N & WYNER SHIRLEY MAYA       1,420,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0516 0400 CONDO 1980   2298    1470050 
50434315270000601 HIMMEL ELINOR B GABRIEL ELLEN TR       400,964.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0601 0400 CONDO 1980   2280    1420750 
50434315270000602 WEINER JAMES A WEINER JAMES A TR       335,492.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0602 0400 CONDO 1980   1516    1074200 
50434315270000603 SHULMAN SYLVIA W TR        1,242,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0603 0400 CONDO 1980   1568    1242200 
50434315270000604 PHILLIPS JOSEPH B & PHILLIPS ROSEMARY B       1,053,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0604 0400 CONDO 1980   1444    1103800 
50434315270000605 CESAN RAUL & CESAN LILIANA       1,502,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0605 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1502800 
50434315270000606 GRAEV LAWRENCE &        1,323,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0606 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1323850 
50434315270000607 WEINBERGER JEROME A &        2,077,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0607 0400 CONDO 1980   2161    2077750 
50434315270000608 MORI FRANK R        1,807,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0608 0400 CONDO 1980   1929    1807900 
50434315270000609 FEBLAND MIRIAM J FEBLAND MIRIAM J TR       268,272.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0609 0400 CONDO 1980   1929    1807900 
50434315270000610 STEIN AUDREY & AUDREY STEIN TR TITL HLDR       1,360,048.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0610 0400 CONDO 1980   2161    2077750 
50434315270000611 JACOBSON DAVID B        1,323,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0611 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1323850 
50434315270000612 SUDLER CLAIRE TRUST PETER & SUDLER MGMT LLC C/O       1,502,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0612 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1502800 
50434315270000613 HANSEN RALPH M & HANSEN EWA M       1,097,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0613 0400 CONDO 1980   1444    1097250 
50434315270000614 NISSENBAUM LILLIAN ROBERT J NISSENBAUM C/O       211,016.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0614 0400 CONDO 1980   1568     937200 
50434315270000615 ARONSTAM NEIL L & ARONSTAM VICKI       892,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0615 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     892050 
50434315270000616 HOFFMAN ARNOLD J & HOFFMAN HELEN G       348,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0616 0400 CONDO 1980   2298    1490050 
50434315270000701 KENNY FINBAR & KENNY MARIANNE       1,440,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0701 0400 CONDO 1980   2280    1440750 
50434315270000702 WINSTON MARION        1,025,320.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0702 0400 CONDO 1980   1516    1094200 
50434315270000703 HANSEN RALPH M & HANSEN EWA M       1,262,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0703 0400 CONDO 1980   1568    1262200 
50434315270000704 SKAFF CHANTAL 1ST NATL P B / PYMT SVCS C/O       1,128,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0704 0400 CONDO 1980   1444    1128800 
50434315270000705 PAHLAVI PARI SIMA        1,203,798.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0705 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1527800 
50434315270000706 CARR KATHERINE        1,348,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0706 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1348850 
50434315270000707 DORMAN LUBA        2,102,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0707 0400 CONDO 1980   2161    2102750 
50434315270000708 CHORNEY JOAN D        647,452.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0708 0400 CONDO 1980   3814    3108000 
50434315270000710 MCLOUGHLIN VICTORIA L TRUST MCLOUGHLIN VICTORIA L TR       2,102,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0710 0400 CONDO 1980   2161    2102750 
50434315270000711 MITCHELL JAN        1,348,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0711 0400 CONDO 1980   1487    1348850 
50434315270000712 ELKIND KENNETH B & ELKIND LYNNEA       321,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0712 0400 CONDO 1980   1815    1527800 
50434315270000713 POTTASH A CARTER        846,692.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0713 0400 CONDO 1980   3012    1659000 
50434315270000715 ABRAHAM S DANIEL & ABRAHAM ELWA       902,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0715 0400 CONDO 1980   1516     902050 
50434315270000716 BRANT LILY        1,510,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0716 0400 CONDO 1980   2298    1510050 
50434315270000801 BAXT VICTOR J & BAXT GUSSIE       2,058,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0801 0400 CONDO 1980   2199    2058000 
50434315270000802 BUNCHER JOANNE K JOANNE BUNCHER RVCBL LVNG TRST       429,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0802 0400 CONDO 1980   2325    2017050 
50434315270000803 NAEGELE JENNIFER        337,824.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0803 0400 CONDO 1980   1915    1930950 
50434315270000804 SCHUSTER BENJAMIN        1,930,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0804 0400 CONDO 1980   1915    1930950 
50434315270000805 ABRAHAM S DANIEL & ABRAHAM EWA       829,501.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0805 0400 CONDO 1980   4273    3570000 
50434315270000901 TRENT GERALDINE J        2,122,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0901 0400 CONDO 1980   2144    2122050 
50434315270000902 SHAFRAN IRVING & SHAFRAN JUDITH       1,959,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0902 0400 CONDO 1980   2143    1959300 
50434315270000903 LAHAINER GIANNA S        309,866.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0903 0400 CONDO 1980   1915    1955950 
50434315270000904 LAHAINER LOMBARDI GIANNA &        1,955,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0904 0400 CONDO 1980   1915    1955950 
50434315270000905 DUBIN ELIZABETH & ZIRKIN NANCY       1,959,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0905 0400 CONDO 1980   2143    1959300 
50434315270000906 ROBERTS MARJORIE R GOODSTEIN MARJORIE R TR       362,987.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0906 0400 CONDO 1980   2144    2122050 
50434315270001001 PELICAN PROPERTY TRUST MACAULAY LINDA R TRS       5,092,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 1001 0400 CONDO 1980   3892    5092500 
50434315270001002 PAHLAVI PARI SIMA        2,712,898.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 1002 0400 CONDO 1980   3299    3691800 
50434315270001003 CESAN RAUL E &        5,567,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 1003 0400 CONDO 1980   3914    5617500 
50434315270001101 URBON JOHN P & URBON SHIRLEY K       1,545,779.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 1101 0400 CONDO 1980   1428    1695750 
50434315270001102 ROSEN GERALDINE & ROTHMAN PAUL       1,071,720.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 1102 0400 CONDO 1980   1390    1696800 
50434315270010010 BRODSKY LYNN W        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010020 ALLAN ROBB A & ALLAN SARA M       152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010030 PEARL TARA E        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010040 ROBERTS GOODSTEIN MARJORIE TR SAXE EDWARD A TR       152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010050 MICHAAN JOSEPH & SUZANNE        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010060 POTTASH A CARTER        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010070 HEYMAN SAMUEL J & HEYMAN RONNIE F       152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010080 WOLOFSKY MOIRA        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010090 LOMBARDI GIANNA L        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010100 ABRAHAM S DANIEL & ABRAHAM EWA       152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010110 ABRAHAM S DANIEL & ABRAHAM EWA       152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010120 CESAN RAUL E &        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010130 PAHLAVI PARI SIMA RES TR #1 &        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010140 CHORNEY JOAN D        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010150 GOULD CALVIN C & HARRIET R        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010160 FINKELSTEIN ALBERT & ANN B        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010170 HANSEN RALPH & HANSEN EVA       152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010180 PELICAN PROP TRUST MACAULAY LINDA R TRS       152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010190 LEWINSTEIN STEPHEN R        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315270010200 LEWINSTEIN STEPHEN        152,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431527 PALM BEACH BILTMORE CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1980      0     152250 
50434315280000010 PALLAS SHAY & RAPHAEL-PALLAS ANDREA       284,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0010 0400 CONDO 1925   1023     284550 
50434315280000131 HOFFMEIER MARGARET        129,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0131 0400 CONDO 1925    453     129150 
50434315280000132 BAGELVILLE INTETRNATIONAL INC        288,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0132 0400 CONDO 1925   1081     288750 
50434315280000134 REMOLINA PAUL I        156,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0134 0400 CONDO 1925    558     156450 
50434315280000135 PETTIE ELLEN L        16,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0135 0400 CONDO 1925    558     156450 
50434315280000136 LOMBARD CLARK CAROL & MCALLISTER DOUGLAS       156,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0136 0400 CONDO 1925    558     156450 
50434315280000137 COLLINS PETER        156,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0137 0400 CONDO 1925    558     156450 
50434315280000138 HEISE RICHARD A SR        352,800.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0138 0400 CONDO 1925   2250     352800 
50434315280001001 ROSCELLO TINA M        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0000 0400 CONDO 1925    184      57750 
50434315280001002 DOREEN LOH NTERNATIONAL INC CORPDIRECT AGENTS INC C/O       114,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1002 0400 CONDO 1925    395     114450 
50434315280001003 OLIVIER RICHARD &        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1003 0400 CONDO 1925    184      57750 
50434315280001004 ABERBACH ANNE M        165,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1004 0400 CONDO 1925    561     165900 
50434315280001005 ISLAND HOTEL INC        148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1005 0400 CONDO 1925    389     148050 
50434315280001007 PINEAU ROBERT M &        148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1007 0400 CONDO 1925    389     148050 
50434315280001008 HEINEMANN RUTH E        165,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1008 0400 CONDO 1925    561     165900 
50434315280001011 PINEAU ROBERT M & PINEAU DONNA J       57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1011 0400 CONDO 1925    184      57750 
50434315280001013 LINKER ELIZABETH &        103,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1013 0400 CONDO 1925    271     103950 
50434315280001014 MARINO THOMAS J        148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1014 0400 CONDO 1925    389     148050 
50434315280001015 LINKER ROBERT C LINKER ELIZABETH       103,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1015 0400 CONDO 1925    271     103950 
50434315280001017 OSTRANDER STEPHEN & OSTRANDER JULIE N       148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1017 0400 CONDO 1925    389     148050 
50434315280001018 CRISCIONE JAMES R & EVANS JANELLE       165,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1018 0400 CONDO 1925    561     165900 
50434315280001021 RUOCCHIO MICHAEL J & RUOCCHIO ANNA E       148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1021 0400 CONDO 1925    389     148050 
50434315280001024 HOWE BENJAMIN A & BARBARA F        148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1024 0400 CONDO 1925    389     148050 
50434315280001025 BLANCHARD JACK M & BLANCHARD DARLENE C       18,674.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1025 0400 CONDO 1925    662     203700 
50434315280001028 PRO ROCK JONATHAN        57,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1028 0400 CONDO 1925    184      57750 
50434315280001030 HENSARLING SANDRA E        103,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1028 0400 CONDO 1925    271     103950 
50434315280001320 LUCZYN OLGA        530,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 1320 0400 CONDO 1925   2175     530250 
50434315280002001 HOSTYN PETER R TRUST HOSTYN PETER R TR       144,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2001 0400 CONDO 1925    448     144900 
50434315280002002 BADGE TRACY L        54,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2002 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002003 HOSTYN PETER R TRUST HOSTYN PETER R TR       144,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2003 0400 CONDO 1925    448     144900 
50434315280002004 EVERT DONALD & EVERT PAMELA       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2004 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002005 BRINTON GARRISON & ROSALIE BRINTON       195,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2005 0400 CONDO 1925    703     195300 
50434315280002006 KISKIS VINCENZA F TRUST POTAMIANOS NADIA TRUSTEE       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2006 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002008 BURT SUE ANN        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2008 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002009 PAGE JAMES R & PAGE FRANCES G       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2009 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002010 ERCEG PETER        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2010 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002011 YANDLE GINA S        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2011 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002012 OBRIEN ERIN        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2012 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002014 BECK SUZANNE        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2014 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002015 SPARKS THERESA C        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2015 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002016 RUIZ EDISON ANTONIO        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2016 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002017 FRIEDMAN PHILIP        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2017 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002018 ROWERN & EMERSON REALTY CORP        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2018 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002019 DANNER STEPHEN H &        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2019 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002020 ROWERN & EMERSON REALTY CORP        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2020 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002022 PALM BEACH HOTEL PARTNERS LLC MARK RAAB C/O       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2022 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002023 BARROWS PHILISSE M        214,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2023 0400 CONDO 1925    813     214200 
50434315280002024 OMALLEY MARTIN J JR        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2024 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002026 IRWIN JOHN A JR        151,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2026 0400 CONDO 1925    480     151200 
50434315280002027 SPILBERG RICHARD & SPILBERG CAROLE       168,766.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2027 0400 CONDO 1925   1261     322350 
50434315280002032 PARENT MARYANN C & MEDWID ROBERT       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2032 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002033 BARBERIAN HELEN        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2033 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002034 KAS ALI        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2034 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002036 COHEN STEVEN & MARJORIE        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2036 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002037 CRANDALL COLLEEN & CRANDALL DENEEN M       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2037 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002038 PDPB LLC        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2038 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002039 WORT MARGARET J        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2039 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002040 SPILBERG RICHARD & SPILBERG CAROLE       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2040 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002041 ZIEGLER STEPHEN P        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2041 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002042 SPILBERG RICHARD & SPILBERG CAROLE       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2042 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002044 BURZYNSKI JOHN        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2044 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002045 CAMELOT PROPERTIES INC JAMES LANSING C/O       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2045 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002046 LAVERTY ANNE M TR        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2046 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002047 KRONICK FAMILY LLC        258,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2047 0400 CONDO 1925    734     258300 
50434315280002048 TAUB NANCY        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2048 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002050 BRITTELLI JOHN &        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2050 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002051 KRONICK FAMILY LLC        144,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2051 0400 CONDO 1925    448     144900 
50434315280002052 LO EDMUND T        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2052 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002053 BJELICA SPASOJE & BJELICA SLAVICA       144,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2053 0400 CONDO 1925    448     144900 
50434315280002054 REISMAN STEVEN A        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2054 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002104 ST JOHN DONALD        67,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2104 0400 CONDO 1925    216      67200 
50434315280002106 BRODA FREDERICK C        197,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2106 0400 CONDO 1925    788     247800 
50434315280002107 PALM BEACH HOTEL PARTNERS LLC MARK RAAB C/O       247,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2107 0400 CONDO 1925    788     247800 
50434315280002201 XHAKLI REXH & XHAKLI SHPRESA       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2201 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002202 SERRA JUAN C 1ST NATL PB/ ATTN D SCOTT C/O       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2202 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002203 FLACH PAUL D        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2203 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002204 SPILBERG RICHARD & SPILBERG CAROLE       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2204 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002207 HUGHES METRA G & HUGHES TEDDY L       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2207 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002208 SZILAGYI JOSEPH & ANN        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2208 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002211 ARMSTRONG JOHN J & FOLCHETTI JOSEPH A JR       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2213 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002212 OSTRANDER STEPHEN T        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2212 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002215 JOHNSON FRANKLIN C        49,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2215 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002216 SOULE CAROLYN & DIANA ROEBER       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2216 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002217 CHIN SANG K & CRISTINA        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2217 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002220 ST JOHN DONALD A        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2220 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002221 GALLUCCI WILLIAM & GALLUCCI CATHERINE       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2221 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002224 CAMPBELL YVONNE TR        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2224 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002225 WILKINS MARK O & MARK & RITA WILKINS ET AL TR HLDRS       116,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2225 0400 CONDO 1925    561     166900 
50434315280002226 VALANDO ELIZABETH LIVIA MOLLER C/O       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2226 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002230 BENSON RAYMOND R JR & JODI M        166,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2230 0400 CONDO 1925    561     166900 
50434315280002236 DOLENZ CRISTINA        166,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2236 0400 CONDO 1925    561     166900 
50434315280002241 PETERSON WHITNEY R & PETERSON LANE E       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2241 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002242 MORENA JOHN J        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2242 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002245 PB PIED DE TERRE LLC        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2245 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002246 SAN FILIPPO TRESA M        2,352.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2246 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002247 SPILBERG RICHARD & SPILBERG CAROLE       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2247 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002250 LATZ GORDON W        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2250 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002251 FOX SEYMOUR &        104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2251 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002252 DIMOV MARINO T        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2252 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002253 OURISMAN MARY        103,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2253 0400 CONDO 1925    271     103950 
50434315280002255 KENNEDY MARIE A        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2255 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002256 235 SUNRISE AVENUE TRUST NUMER PANQULINAN       149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2256 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002259 STERN EDWARD M        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2259 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002260 ZISKA MADELON        23,803.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2260 0400 CONDO 1925    561     166900 
50434315280002263 BOOZER BRENDA &        149,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2263 0400 CONDO 1925    389     149050 
50434315280002266 DICKINSON LEWIS & DICKINSON SUE       58,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2266 0400 CONDO 1925    184      58750 
50434315280002267 ROGERS WALLACE        685.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2267 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280002268 DICKINSON LEWIS & DICKINSON SUE       104,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 2268 0400 CONDO 1925    271     104950 
50434315280003001 GRACE OLIVER JR        145,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3001 0400 CONDO 1925    448     145900 
50434315280003002 ROWEN & EMERSON REALTY CORP HOLDEN & HABEL C/O       105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3002 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003003 GRACE OLIVER R JR        145,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3003 0400 CONDO 1925    448     145900 
50434315280003004 HOWARD HAL B TR        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3004 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003005 GRACE OLIVER R        196,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3005 0400 CONDO 1925    703     196300 
50434315280003006 DANZIGER GLORIA G        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3006 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003008 WHITTAKER SAM E        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3008 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003009 MILLS MARIE L        100,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3009 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003010 MCCUNE HEATHER M        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3010 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003012 ISLAND HOTEL INC        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3012 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003013 WALSH MADELINE M        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3013 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003014 HOEYNK HEIDEMARIE        0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3014 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003015 BUTLER JAMES        55,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3015 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003016 CRANDALL COLLEEN        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3016 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003017 ISLAND HOTEL INC        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3017 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003018 CROWTHER E DOREEN        0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3018 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003019 DIAMOND ARTHUR S        130,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3019 0400 CONDO 1925    395     130200 
50434315280003020 BERNSTEIN STUART A & BERNSTEIN WILMA E       105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3020 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003022 MCCUNE HEATHER M        55,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3022 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003023 HAYES HOLIDAE H TRUST HAYES HOLIDAE H TR       196,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3023 0400 CONDO 1925    703     196300 
50434315280003027 LAVERTY ANNE M TR        145,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3027 0400 CONDO 1925    448     145900 
50434315280003029 PATNAUDE ANASTASIA        196,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3029 0400 CONDO 1925    703     196300 
50434315280003032 BRANDT KEVIN M JAMES RIVER CAPITAL C/O       196,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3032 0400 CONDO 1925    703     196300 
50434315280003033 UNITED SUNRISE REALTY LLC        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3033 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003034 WARLICK JOHN W        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3034 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003036 STERN PETER        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3036 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003037 ROBINSON JAMES & ROBINSON SUSAN       105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3037 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003038 MARSHALL VALERIE KING FAHAD NATL GUARD HOSPITAL C/O       105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3038 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003039 LYNCH ANN MARIE        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3039 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003040 DANZIGER GLORIA G        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3040 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003041 LYNCH ANN M        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3041 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003042 DANZIGER GLORIA G        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3042 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003043 SCHEINER REBECCA        130,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3043 0400 CONDO 1925    395     130200 
50434315280003044 CUDLIP BRITTAIN B        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3044 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003046 TAGLIAFERRI CYNTHIA        16,546.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3046 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003047 TREETOP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3047 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003048 REISMAN STEVEN A        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3048 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003049 GRACE JOHN R & SHERRI L        334,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3049 0400 CONDO 1925   1295     334950 
50434315280003050 MCCUNE MAURA L        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3050 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003052 CELENTANO BARBARA M        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3052 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003054 MAK JANICE L        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3054 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003101 DANZIGER GLORIA G        145,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3101 0400 CONDO 1925    448     145900 
50434315280003103 SOULE CATHERINE T        17,451.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3103 0400 CONDO 1925    497     154350 
50434315280003104 SAUER ROBERT W        68,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3104 0400 CONDO 1925    216      68200 
50434315280003106 CAMPAIGN H JOHN        248,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3106 0400 CONDO 1925    788     248800 
50434315280003107 REYNOLDS BRIAN G & REYNOLDS KATHRYN A       198,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3107 0400 CONDO 1925    788     248800 
50434315280003201 KERBEL BERTHA INV LTD        152,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3201 0400 CONDO 1925    480     152200 
50434315280003202 LULEK CHESTER CHESTER LULEK TRUST       0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3202 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003204 GRIKITIS MARGARET & GRIKITIS ALEXANDER       150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3204 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003205 GODLEY ROBERT J & BETTY        167,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3205 0400 CONDO 1925    561     167900 
50434315280003208 HOLSTEIN KARIN        75,053.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3208 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003211 BEACH NITA        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3211 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003212 MILANO MARY        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3212 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003215 LOVRIEN EVE        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0000 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003216 EARL ANDREW        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3216 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003217 ABITINO DOMENICO        100,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0000 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003220 GOLDSCHMIDT ASHA & GOLDSCHMIDT JANNU       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3220 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003221 NOLAND CATHLEEN V        167,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3221 0400 CONDO 1925    561     167900 
50434315280003224 SAMPSON JON O & SAMPSON NANCY       150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3224 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003225 PARK PROPERTIES MIAMI        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3225 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003230 HENSARLING MARY A &        148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3230 0400 CONDO 1925    389     148050 
50434315280003232 BAKER NOEL E A & MC LEAN IAN J       165,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3232 0400 CONDO 1925    561     165900 
50434315280003238 PUNNETT R JOHN        167,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3238 0400 CONDO 1925    561     167900 
50434315280003241 STEIN RUTH        11,358.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3241 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003244 DUPUY ALMA        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3244 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003245 PALM BEACH PARADISE LLC        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3245 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003247 FASSL JOYCE &        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3247 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003248 4663 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD LLC MS ALICIA M GRACE C/O       150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3248 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003249 LORING DOLORES G        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3249 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003250 4663 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD LLC MS ALICIA M GRACE C/O       150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3250 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003251 COLLINS PETER S        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3251 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003252 SCROOGIE GLORIA        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3252 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003253 ISLAND HOTEL INC        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3253 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003256 SCHEINER REBECCA        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3256 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003257 MCMASTER K S & ROSALIE E & WALLE J & DEBRA G WATERS       150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3257 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003260 BRADY ROSINA M        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3260 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003261 ROSENTHAL MARK &        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3261 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003264 WELLS WARREN W        150,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3264 0400 CONDO 1925    389     150050 
50434315280003265 PALM BEACH LUXURY RENTALS LLC STEVEN REISMAN C/O       105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3265 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280003268 GELL MANN MARCIA S        105,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 3268 0400 CONDO 1925    271     105950 
50434315280004010 HOLIDAE H HAYES TRUST & MASRI CHERYL       201,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4010 0400 CONDO 1925    444     201600 
50434315280004020 MENILLO MICHAEL A & MENILLO LINDA A       201,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4020 0400 CONDO 1925    444     201600 
50434315280004030 FALLON SEAMUS        201,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4030 0400 CONDO 1925    444     201600 
50434315280004040 FALLON SEAMUS        201,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4040 0400 CONDO 1925    444     201600 
50434315280004050 IONESCU DAN        201,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4050 0400 CONDO 1925    444     201600 
50434315280004060 VALENTA VIRGINIA        303,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4060 0400 CONDO 1925    604     303450 
50434315280004070 ISLAND HOTEL INC        303,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4070 0400 CONDO 1925    604     303450 
50434315280004080 OWEN TARA A        201,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4080 0400 CONDO 1925    444     201600 
50434315280004090 STITT HAROLD L  FAMILY BYPASS TRUST & STITT FAMILY TRUST       177,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4090 0400 CONDO 1925    603     177450 
50434315280004110 STITT HAROLD L & AUSTINE N        177,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 4110 0400 CONDO 1925    603     177450 
50434315280010010 PALM BEACH HOTEL        225,776.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010020 PALM BEACH HOTEL        388,301.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010030 PALM BEACH HOTEL        72,876.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010040 PALM BEACH HOTEL        198,826.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0040 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010050 PALM BEACH HOTEL        147,676.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0050 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010060 PALM BEACH HOTEL        127,326.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0060 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010070 COLLEEN M CRANDALL LLC        159,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0070 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010080 KAYE SUMNER G        159,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) CM 7 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010090 PALM BEACH HOTEL        114,676.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0090 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010100 PALM BEACH HOTEL        88,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0100 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010110 PALM BEACH HOTEL        88,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0110 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010120 PALM BEACH HOTEL        218,626.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0120 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010130 PALM BEACH HOTEL        196,351.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0130 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010140 PALM BEACH HOTEL        222,201.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0140 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010150 RAVA        190,026.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0150 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010160 RAVA LLC        335,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0160 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010170 PALM BEACH HOTEL        64,121.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0170 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010180 MCCUNE HEATHER & MCCUNE MAURA       34,486.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0180 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010190 PALM BEACH INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES LLC        2,167,561.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0190 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010200 DOREEN LOH INTERNATIONAL INC CORPDIRECT AGENTS INC C/O       167,176.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0200 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010210 C J HAMILTON LLC MORRISON HAMILTON C/O       165,601.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0210 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010220 ISLAND HOTEL INC        874,201.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0220 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010230 TRAINERS GYM INC        118,801.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0230 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010240 TRAINERS GYM INC        118,801.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0240 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010250 TRAINERS GYM INC        118,801.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0250 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280010260 TRAINERS GYM INC        118,801.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0260 0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434315280020010 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0010 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020020 LORING DOLORES G        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0020 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020030 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0030 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020040 HOTYN PETER R        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0040 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020050 ROGERS WALLACE        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0050 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020060 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0060 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020070 SAUER ROBERT W        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0070 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020080 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0080 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020090 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0090 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020100 ROGERS WALLACE        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0100 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020110 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0110 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020120 HOSTYN PETER R TR        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0120 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020130 DANZIGER GLORIA G        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0130 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020140 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0140 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020150 BRANDT KEVIN M JAMES RIVER CAPITAL C/O       3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0150 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020160 BRANDT KEVIN M JAMES RIVER CAPITAL C/O       3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0160 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020170 CELENTANO BARBARA M        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0170 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020180 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0180 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020190 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0190 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020200 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0200 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020210 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0210 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020220 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0220 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020230 REMOLINA PAUL I        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0230 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020240 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0240 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020250 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0250 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020260 BRANDT KEVIN M JAMES RIVER CAPITAL C/O       3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0260 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020270 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0270 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020280 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0280 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020290 LORING DOLORES G        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0290 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020300 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0300 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020310 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0310 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020320 HOTYN PETER R        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0320 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020330 LYNCH ANN M        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0330 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020340 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0340 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020350 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0350 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020360 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0360 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020370 BLANCHARD JACK M & DARLENE C        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0370 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020380 PALM BEACH HOTEL CONDO ASSN INC        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0380 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315280020390 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND        3,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431528 PALM BEACH HOTEL COND(RES & *) 0390 0400 CONDO 1925      0       3675 
50434315290000010 BUCHANAN HELEN K        165,596.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431529 PALM BCH ATLANTIC ANNEX CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1984   1351     481950 
50434315290000020 WALKER BONNIE D        157,125.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431529 PALM BCH ATLANTIC ANNEX CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1984   1351     481950 
50434315300001010 AMMIRATI RALPH &        889,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431530 VILLA D ESTE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1983   1802     889350 
50434315300001020 FIRESTONE JOHN D TRUST JOHN D FIRESTONE TR       889,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431530 VILLA D ESTE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1983   1802     889350 
50434315300002010 ELKUS LORNA WHEATLY        868,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431530 VILLA D ESTE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1983   1802     868350 
50434315300002020 BONOMO THORYA        868,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431530 VILLA D ESTE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1984   1802     868350 
50434315310000010 STAFFORD TARA K        284,926.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1985   1120     458850 
50434315310000020 DALFONSO JOSEPH & DALFONSO PRISCILLA       172,046.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1985   1218     489300 
50434315310000030 WESTOFF LESLIE A LESLIE A WESTOFF TR HLDR       148,313.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1985   1099     432600 
50434315310000040 DINOVO ALI        148,313.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1985   1099     432600 
50434315310000050 RAKOV ROBERT W        343,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1985    874     343350 
50434315310000060 BAUMANN MARGUERITE L TR BAUMANN CHARLES J TR       432,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1985   1099     432600 
50434315310000070 FLOECKHER LOUISE W        147,813.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1985   1099     432600 
50434315310000080 OSTRANDER ROBERT J & OSTRANDER JACQUELINE A       489,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1984   1218     489300 
50434315310000090 CHASE MANHATTAN BK        458,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431531 ISLAND VILLAS CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1985   1120     458850 
50434315320000051 ARBACE SUZANNE RUGGIERO ISABELLA ARBACE       124,907.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431532 FONTANA PROPERTIES CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1985   1080     465150 
50434315320000052 SIAM INC        465,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431532 FONTANA PROPERTIES CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1985   1080     465150 
50434315320000053 DOUGHERTY CAROLINE & DOUGHERTY ANNE       484,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431532 FONTANA PROPERTIES CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1985   1011     484050 
50434315320000231 WAGNER JEAN A        415,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431532 FONTANA PROPERTIES CONDO 0231 0400 CONDO 1985   1080     465150 
50434315320000232 BULL ROBERT L IV & WARD HEATHER       465,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431532 FONTANA PROPERTIES CONDO 0232 0400 CONDO 1985   1080     465150 
50434315320000233 HARDWICK ROBERT D & ELIZABETH        484,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431532 FONTANA PROPERTIES CONDO 0233 0400 CONDO 1985   1011     484050 
50434315330010010 PALANDJIAN PETROS & SHEILA        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010020 BENNIES BRIDGE LLP        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010030 HESS MARSHALL &        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010040 MENDIK SUSAN MARITAL TRUST HODAS ARNOLD J TR &       81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010050 SHAPIRO RENEE        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010060 DEANE MAURICE A & DEANE BARBARA E       81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010070 KAUFMAN ROBERT PERS RESIDENCE TRUST & KAUFMAN FLORENCE PERS RESIDENCE TRUST       81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010080 SIRULNICK RESIDENCE TRUST        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010090 UGELOW JUNE TR        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010100 KEMPF EDWINA L        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010110 NESSEL MELVIN B        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010120 SIROW RICHARD L & LINDA S KOPLEWICZ TRS ET AL       81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010130 SYLVIA OLNICK        81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010140 ARONSON HARVEY TRUST ARONSON HARVEY TRUSTEE       81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330010150 KAUFMAN ELAINE HENRY KAUFMAN & CO INC C/O       81,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1985      0      81900 
50434315330011010 HESS MARSHALL &        1,313,628.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1985   2252    1935150 
50434315330011020 CASSADY THOMAS        528,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1985   2515    2427600 
50434315330011030 SIRULNICK RESIDENCE TRUST        3,461,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1985   3152    3461850 
50434315330011040 ANSIN ADELINE S ANSIN ADELINE S TR       730,490.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1985   2619    2762550 
50434315330011050 ARONSON HARVEY        916,071.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1985   3211    3418800 
50434315330011060 KAHN MORTON        1,873,651.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1985   3269    2730000 
50434315330012010 MYERBERG ALVIN J REV TRUST MYERBERG ALVIN J TRUSTEE       2,266,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1985   2335    2266950 
50434315330012020 BROWN VIRGINIA L TR        2,581,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1985   2577    2581950 
50434315330012030 KINER ANN B KINER ANN B TR       945,531.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1985   3290    3616200 
50434315330012040 BARR MYER B & LERMITAGE B TRUST       1,719,056.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1985   2716    2916900 
50434315330012050 SHAPIRO MURIEL        890,434.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1985   3323    3573150 
50434315330012060 SIROW MELVIN SIROW RICHARD L TR       608,067.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1985   2648    2421300 
50434315330013010 KEMPF EDWINA L        2,316,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1985   2335    2316950 
50434315330013020 GORDON BARBARA K TR        2,631,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1985   2577    2631950 
50434315330013030 PALANDJIAN SHEILA TARANTO THOMAS R JR TR       3,379,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1985   3290    3666200 
50434315330013040 SHAPIRO RENEE        2,966,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1985   2716    2966900 
50434315330013050 BENNIES BRIDGE LLP        3,623,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1985   3323    3623150 
50434315330013060 HIMELES MARTIN S & BETTY J HIMELES BETTY J       656,158.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1985   2648    2471300 
50434315330014010 ZAHN MILLICENT        631,672.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1985   2335    2366950 
50434315330014020 RUDNICK CECIL N        1,016,869.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1985   2577    2681950 
50434315330014030 MENDIK SUSAN MARITAL TRUST HODAS ARNOLD J TR &       3,716,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1985   3290    3716200 
50434315330014040 KAUFMAN ROBERT PERS RESIDENCE TRUST & KAUFMAN FLORENCE PERS RESIDENCE TRUST       3,016,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1985   2716    3016900 
50434315330014050 DEANE MAURICE A & DEANE BARBARA E       3,673,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1985   3323    3673150 
50434315330014060 CANTOR MURIEL B MURIEL B CANTOR TR TITL HLDR       704,246.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1985   2648    2521300 
50434315330015010 UGELOW JUNE TR        2,424,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1985   2365    2424450 
50434315330015020 BERRY VIVIAN HAROLD BERRY TR       2,890,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1985   2577    2890650 
50434315330015030 OLNICK SLYVIA        3,924,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1985   3290    3924900 
50434315330015040 NESSEL GAIL RAMPELL PAUL TR       917,007.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1985   2716    3225600 
50434315330015050 KAUFMAN ELAINE        7,059,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431533 L ERMITAGE PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1985   4823    7059150 
50434315340001010 101 PALM BEACH REGENT LLLP        1,587,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1987   2273    1587600 
50434315340001020 101 PALM BEACH REGENT LLLP        2,200,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1987   3152    2200800 
50434315340001030 GOTTWALD FLOYD D JR ETHYL CORP C/O       2,764,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1987   3793    2764650 
50434315340001040 GOTTWALD FLOYD D JR ETHYL CORP C/O       1,139,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1987   1633    1139250 
50434315340002010 BROWN STEPHEN L & BROWN ARLEEN C       2,046,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1987   3215    2096850 
50434315340002020 PUDER ROBERT S & MARGERY N TRS PUDER MARGERY N TRS       924,038.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1987   3416    2866500 
50434315340002030 HASSENFELD RITA D        1,743,482.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1987   6631    4608450 
50434315340003010 122766 CANADA INC SYLVAIN LAGACE C/O       2,121,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1987   3215    2121850 
50434315340003020 SPITZER SYLVIA D        977,471.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1987   3416    2916500 
50434315340003030 STERN FAMILY 2005 TRUST STERN STEVEN TR       2,936,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1987   3416    2936850 
50434315340003040 ROSEN ANITA J        549,539.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1987   3215    2102100 
50434315340004010 HASSAN CHARLES &        2,146,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1987   3215    2146850 
50434315340004020 FISHER LESTER & GWEN        2,966,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1987   3416    2966500 
50434315340004030 SCHULMAN MILTON M        980,349.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1987   3416    2986850 
50434315340004040 404 FLORIDA ASSOC        2,127,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1987   3215    2127100 
50434315340005010 BELFER ROBERT A TR        5,026,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1987   5431    5026350 
50434315340005020 SCHMIDT PATRICIA TRUST STEIN RICHARD H TR       5,026,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431534 PARC REGENT CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1987   5431    5026350 
50434315350000010 LAKE TOWERS ASSN INC        233,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    692     233000 
50434315350000020 ALFOND PETER        10,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** M-2 0400 CONDO 1988    218      10000 
50434315350000030 NAVESINK INVESTMENTS        10,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** M-3 0400 CONDO 1988    218      10000 
50434315350000040 SEEDMAN BARBARA        10,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** M-4 0400 CONDO 1988    218      10000 
50434315350000050 WARNER ROBERT & JANE        10,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** M-5 0400 CONDO 1988    218      10000 
50434315350000060 MOLONEY THOMAS W & SALSGIVER JAN       10,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** M-6 0400 CONDO 1988    218      10000 
50434315350000070 MICHAEL SUDARSKY & ALEXANDRA OKOLITA       10,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** M-7 0400 CONDO 1988    218      10000 
50434315350002010 GOHMANN CAROLYN        200,108.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    840     314000 
50434315350002020 SANDS RICK LIVING TRUST        348,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     348000 
50434315350002030 THOMPSON GERARD M & THOMPSON BARBARA W       348,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     348000 
50434315350002040 FELL LAURENCE JR &        644,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 204 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     644000 
50434315350002050 BELL JONATHAN T & MARCIA A MARCIA A BELL       118,689.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 205 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     644000 
50434315350002060 GADOW SANDRA S        579,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     579000 
50434315350002070 CERNY-VAN CAMP MARILOU        579,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     579000 
50434315350002080 DEGUZMAN CATHERINE        323,536.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1681    1037000 
50434315350002090 ALFOND PETER        579,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     579000 
50434315350002100 GADOW SANDRA S GADOW SANDRA S TR       112,726.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     579000 
50434315350003010 ROSS ALEXANDER B & ROSS MARY C       334,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    840     334000 
50434315350003020 BIELENBERG BARBARA K        73,942.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     368000 
50434315350003030 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TR        368,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     368000 
50434315350003040 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TR        664,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 304 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     664000 
50434315350003050 MATTERA LAWRENCE M        664,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 305 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     664000 
50434315350003060 CIOC IOANA        599,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     599000 
50434315350003070 BISHOP SUSAN K        599,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     599000 
50434315350003080 KATZ JOEL TRUST KATZ JOEL TRUSTEE       1,057,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1681    1057000 
50434315350003090 NAVESINK INVESTMENTS        599,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     599000 
50434315350003100 JORDAN KATHRYN C        522,680.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     599000 
50434315350004010 EHRET MARK & MILLER JENNIFER       206,799.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    840     422000 
50434315350004020 PAPPAS JAMES        456,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     456000 
50434315350004030 ESM FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        456,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     456000 
50434315350004040 ESM FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        773,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 404 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     773000 
50434315350004050 CORRADINO RICHARD J & CORRADINO JOAN       402,368.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 405 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     773000 
50434315350004060 LONTZ CAROLYN M        708,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     708000 
50434315350004070 JACKSON HANSON COLLEEN M        625,680.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     708000 
50434315350004080 SEEDMAN BARBARA        515,161.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 408 0400 CONDO 1988   1681    1166000 
50434315350004090 DWYER EARLENE J &        625,680.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     708000 
50434315350004100 ZELINSKY CARL S & ZELINSKY IRENE       708,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     708000 
50434315350005010 TOCHNER PAUL M        252,412.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    840     442000 
50434315350005020 COUGHLIN THOMAS & COUGHLIN SHEILA       476,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     476000 
50434315350005030 MOLONEY THOMAS W & SALSGIVER JAN       476,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     476000 
50434315350005040 CELENTANO MARIAN        743,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 504 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     793000 
50434315350005050 MARX CHARLENE        358,817.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 505 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     793000 
50434315350005060 VERROS JAMES & GEORGIA        728,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     728000 
50434315350005070 HEAVEY WINIFRED C HEAVEY WINIFRED C TR       646,280.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     728000 
50434315350005080 BORCHARDT SUSAN C        515,661.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1681    1186000 
50434315350005090 WARNER ROBERT        179,608.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     728000 
50434315350005100 FUNK JUDY        97,983.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     728000 
50434315350006010 MOODY WILLIAM        462,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    840     462000 
50434315350006020 SAMII SADEGH ADIB & KHOOSHE AIKEN TR TITL HLDR       425,860.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     496000 
50434315350006030 KENT GLORIA        496,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     496000 
50434315350006040 SACCARO RICHARD & SACCARO BETTY       445,865.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 604 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     813000 
50434315350006050 DALEMAR PROPERTIES        815,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 605 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     813000 
50434315350006060 TSANDIKOS GEORGE & RYAN KEVIN M       748,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     748000 
50434315350006070 FOLINO PETER LOAN SERVICING ESCROW DEPT C/O       748,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     748000 
50434315350006080 CHICK CYNTHIA & CHICK PETER       1,103,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1681    1206000 
50434315350006090 GRACE WILLIAM J & KATSOV VICTORIA       748,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     748000 
50434315350006100 POMPEII RAYMOND        179,608.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     748000 
50434315350007010 CHOPP MARIANNE        297,214.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    840     552000 
50434315350007020 ESPIRITU SANTO USA INC        585,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     585000 
50434315350007030 SALVADOR JAN        274,903.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988    871     585000 
50434315350007040 APPLE STEVEN L APPLE RUBBER PRODUCTS C/O       924,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 704 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     924000 
50434315350007050 LINDNER SYLVIE        426,020.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO *** 705 0400 CONDO 1988   1220     924000 
50434315350007060 ZANO MARIA E & HUNNEWELL RICHARD G       860,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     860000 
50434315350007070 DANSEY WILLIAM E JR        467,613.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     860000 
50434315350007080 PAPPAS JAMES A        1,206,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1681    1318000 
50434315350007090 SUDARSKY MICHAEL MICHAEL SUDARSKY TR TITL HLDR       669,071.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     860000 
50434315350007100 BRADLEY ROBERT N        248,943.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431535 LAKE TOWERS CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1988   1220     860000 
50434315360000000 PALM BEACH TH LTD PTNRSHP ENRIC PLATI ENTERPRISES LTD C/O       0.00 1.32 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434315360000000 PALM BEACH TH LTD PTNRSHP ENRIC PLATI ENTERPRISES LTD C/O       0.00 1.32 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434315360010010 WEINER ROBERTA        3,083,378.00 0.0438 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   4034    3076500 
50434315360010010 WEINER ROBERTA        3,083,378.00 0.0438 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   4034    3076500 
50434315360010020 DANIELS LEE S & DANIELS JOAN       2,772,422.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3411    2772000 
50434315360010020 DANIELS LEE S & DANIELS JOAN       2,772,422.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3411    2772000 
50434315360010030 ZAHID AMIRA        2,688,422.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2688000 
50434315360010030 ZAHID AMIRA        2,688,422.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2688000 
50434315360010040 IRELAND JAMES M        2,637,409.00 0.0378 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2636550 
50434315360010040 IRELAND JAMES M        2,637,409.00 0.0378 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2636550 
50434315360020050 POPPEL HARVEY L & POPPEL EMILY A       1,739,877.00 0.043 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3847    2849700 
50434315360020050 POPPEL HARVEY L & POPPEL EMILY A       1,739,877.00 0.043 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3847    2849700 
50434315360020060 LIPSON PALM BEACH HLDGS LTD        2,335,834.00 0.038 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3437    2335200 
50434315360020060 LIPSON PALM BEACH HLDGS LTD        2,335,834.00 0.038 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3437    2335200 
50434315360020070 DONAGHY PATRICK J        2,265,272.00 0.0356 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3180    2264850 
50434315360020070 DONAGHY PATRICK J        2,265,272.00 0.0356 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3180    2264850 
50434315360020080 HOLLADAY WALLACE F JR &        2,428,022.00 0.0383 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3440    2427600 
50434315360020080 HOLLADAY WALLACE F JR &        2,428,022.00 0.0383 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3440    2427600 
50434315360020090 GRASSO MICHAEL &        2,265,272.00 0.0356 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3180    2264850 
50434315360020090 GRASSO MICHAEL &        2,265,272.00 0.0356 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   3180    2264850 
50434315360020100 WOLF SYLVIA        1,770,644.00 0.038 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3437    2335200 
50434315360020100 WOLF SYLVIA        1,770,644.00 0.038 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3437    2335200 
50434315360020110 CHEDINGTON TOWNHOUSE LTD        2,857,236.00 0.0431 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3847    2849700 
50434315360020110 CHEDINGTON TOWNHOUSE LTD        2,857,236.00 0.0431 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3847    2849700 
50434315360030120 ABRAMSON RUTH C ABRAMSON RUTH C       1,154,573.00 0.0378 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2636550 
50434315360030120 ABRAMSON RUTH C ABRAMSON RUTH C       1,154,573.00 0.0378 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2636550 
50434315360030130 MDPB INC        2,688,422.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2688000 
50434315360030130 MDPB INC        2,688,422.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2688000 
50434315360030140 SOKMENSUER ADIL &        2,669,620.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2772000 
50434315360030140 SOKMENSUER ADIL &        2,669,620.00 0.0375 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1992   3411    2772000 
50434315360030150 IMPERATUM CORPORATION RESOURCE & TECHNOLOGY LTD C/O       3,087,217.00 0.0438 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   4034    3076500 
50434315360030150 IMPERATUM CORPORATION RESOURCE & TECHNOLOGY LTD C/O       3,087,217.00 0.0438 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043431536 VILLA PLATI TWNHS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1991   4034    3076500 
50434315370000010 LATITUDE O LLC        150,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002    409     150150 
50434315370000020 GOLDEN RAYMOND L & GOLDEN LINDA       132,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002    357     132300 
50434315370000021 FRIEDMAN CYNTHIA        4,080,031.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   4881    4357500 
50434315370000023 DUFFY HEIDI K        1,181,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2895    1394400 
50434315370000030 BARON RONALD &        110,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002    292     110250 
50434315370000031 GOLDBERG RICHARD & GOLDBERG MARSHA       5,690,190.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   5798    5851650 
50434315370000032 BERNSTEIN STUART & BERNSTEIN WILMA       2,246,900.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2915    2341500 
50434315370000033 MORROW ROBERT        2,694,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2895    2694300 
50434315370000040 SHEVELL MYRON P KOCHMAN & BRAUN C/O       142,800.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002    386     142800 
50434315370000041 BARON RONALD &        5,951,650.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   5798    5951650 
50434315370000042 CRYSTAL RICHARD P & CRYSTAL CAROLE       2,416,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2915    2416500 
50434315370000043 KATZ STANLEY &        2,719,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2895    2769300 
50434315370000051 GOLDEN RAYMOND L & GOLDEN LINDA       5,708,339.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO 5A 0400 CONDO 2002   5798    6051650 
50434315370000052 SMALL ALBERT H & SMALL SHIRLEY       2,491,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2915    2491500 
50434315370000053 GREEN BARBARA G        2,844,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2895    2844300 
50434315370000061 MUNDER LEE & MUNDER LAURA       6,151,650.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   5798    6151650 
50434315370000062 LATITUDE O LLC        2,566,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2915    2566500 
50434315370000063 SHEVELL MYRON P        2,919,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002   2895    2919300 
50434315370010000 IL LUGANO CONDOMINIUM ASSN INC PRIME MGMT C/O       5,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431537 IL LUGANO CONDO  0400 CONDO 2002      0       5250 
50434315380000010 234 OLEANDER FLORIDA LLC        284,918.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431538 TWO THIRTY FOUR OLEANDER AVENUE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1959    803     284918 
50434315380000020 234 OLEANDER FLORIDA LLC        284,918.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431538 TWO THIRTY FOUR OLEANDER AVENUE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1959    803     284918 
50434315380000030 234 OLEANDER FLORIDA LLC        284,918.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431538 TWO THIRTY FOUR OLEANDER AVENUE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1959    803     284918 
50434315380000040 234 OLEANDER FLORIDA LLC        284,918.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431538 TWO THIRTY FOUR OLEANDER AVENUE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1959    803     284918 
50434315380000050 234 OLEANDER FLORIDA LLC        284,918.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431538 TWO THIRTY FOUR OLEANDER AVENUE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1959    803     284918 
50434315380000060 234 OLEANDER FLORIDA LLC        284,918.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043431538 TWO THIRTY FOUR OLEANDER AVENUE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1959    803     284918 
50434322000001010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 1.79 MUNICIPAL           1958 1958 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      23400        664         
50434322000001010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 1.79 MUNICIPAL           1979 1979 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     160120       3183         
50434322000010030 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.34 MUNICIPAL                           
50434322000010040 ISLAND PROPERTIES OF PALM BEACH INC STERLING PALM BEACH LLC C/O       2,745,000.00 0 STORES           1953 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     238100       2772         
50434322000010050 SPIEGEL SIDNEY TR # 31520371 STERLING PALM BEACH LLC C/O       44,528,394.00 10 SH CTR CMMITY           1957 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    4170500      32074         
50434322000010050 SPIEGEL SIDNEY TR # 31520371 STERLING PALM BEACH LLC C/O       44,528,394.00 10 SH CTR CMMITY           1957 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS   12042240     112119         
50434322000010050 SPIEGEL SIDNEY TR # 31520371 STERLING PALM BEACH LLC C/O       44,528,394.00 10 SH CTR CMMITY           1983 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    4353090      36031         
50434322000020010 ROYAL POINCIANA CHAPEL ARMIDA WELSH C/O       0.00 2.14 RELIGIOUS 1900 1980 00 04 00 2     343873       4421       4869       4247 1900 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1280020      17540         
50434322000020010 ROYAL POINCIANA CHAPEL ARMIDA WELSH C/O       0.00 2.14 RELIGIOUS 1900 1980 00 04 00 2     343873       4421       4869       4247 1991 1991 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      31960        408         
50434322000020040 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        3,396,080.00 0.85 FINANCIAL                           
50434322000020050 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        4,366,270.00 0 FINANCIAL           1953 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     799300      17529         
50434322000020050 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        4,366,270.00 0 FINANCIAL           1975 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     210980       4642         
50434322000020070 FLAGLER HENRY M MUSEUM        0.00 3.63 CULTURAL                           
50434322000020080 FLAGLER HENRY M MUSEUM        0.00 0 CULTURAL           1902 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    9331570     131258         
50434322000020080 FLAGLER HENRY M MUSEUM        0.00 0 CULTURAL           2004 2004 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    3220300       8100         
50434322000030010 FIREMAN PHYLLIS        18,831,049.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 2000 05 08 01 2    1572911      14885      16066      13876                 
50434322000030020 ANDERSON H LOY JR & ANDERSON INGER K       3,038,281.00 1.013 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1942 05 06 01 3     157238       6731       7258       5754                 
50434322000030020 ANDERSON H LOY JR & ANDERSON INGER K       3,038,281.00 1.013 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1950 02 02 00 2       9861       2258       2526       1626                 
50434322000030030 SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS        0.00 0 CULTURAL                           
50434322000030080 SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS        0.00 0.43 CULTURAL                           
50434322000030090 FOUR ARTS SOCIETY        0.00 0 CULTURAL                           
50434322000030100 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.34 FOREST/PK/REC                           
50434322000030110 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.91 FOREST/PK/REC           1989 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      25250        336         
50434322000030120 SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FL REAL ESTATE SERVICES       0.00 0 PUB CTY SCHOOL           1929 1941 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     643150      19078         
50434322000030120 SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FL REAL ESTATE SERVICES       0.00 0 PUB CTY SCHOOL           1959 1959 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     174620       3406         
50434322000030120 SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FL REAL ESTATE SERVICES       0.00 0 PUB CTY SCHOOL           2005 2005 0001 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1096830       8506         
50434322000030120 SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FL REAL ESTATE SERVICES       0.00 0 PUB CTY SCHOOL           2005 2005 0001 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2241770      17440         
50434322000030120 SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FL REAL ESTATE SERVICES       0.00 0 PUB CTY SCHOOL           2005 2005 0001 01 2 FIRE RESIS    4930430      42445         
50434322000030130 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.12 MUNICIPAL           1996 1996 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      87380       1632         
50434322010010010 WELCH KENNETH M & BRANDES JAN LEWIS       1,532,340.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1985 03 03 00 1      27881       2041       2337       1913                 
50434322010010012 RISA PROPERTY CO        2,032,939.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 03 03 01 2     519913       4468       4843       4385                 
50434322010010031 JONES CHARLES &        2,734,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 00 03 01 2     397383       4710       5659       3667                 
50434322010010061 OLSSON LINDA R        1,890,317.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 00 01 00 1      58507        673        792        396                 
50434322010010061 OLSSON LINDA R        1,890,317.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 03 03 00 2     326971       3245       3480       2660                 
50434322010010080 ROTH DAVID L & ROTH PAULA P       704,031.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 03 03 01 2     411999       4730       5227       3853                 
50434322010010091 OLSSON LINDA R        845,633.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1965 00 01 00 2      93882        884       1105        553                 
50434322010010091 OLSSON LINDA R        845,633.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1980 03 02 00 2     254876       2471       2787       2119                 
50434322010010101 TILNEY C KANE        768,123.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1957 00 01 00 1      85367       1054       1305        573                 
50434322010010101 TILNEY C KANE        768,123.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 03 03 01 2     331870       3818       3930       3424                 
50434322010010121 TILNEY CYNTHIA H        981,010.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1965 04 04 01 2     406374       4640       5352       3830                 
50434322010010160 MARE INVESTMENTS INC        2,011,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1990 00 03 01 2     497926       5232       5739       4194                 
50434322010010180 HICKOX DANIELLE A        1,794,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1985 00 03 01 2     851329       5395       6099       4459                 
50434322010010200 LEE SUSAN C        2,107,215.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1955 04 04 00 2     604243       5093       5961       4114                 
50434322010020010 BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH        0.00 0 RELIGIOUS                           
50434322010020020 BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH        0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1965 03 03 01 2     203807       2612       2767       2189                 
50434322010020030 DICKEY PAUL B JR        880,568.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1944 1970 03 03 00 2     201658       2373       2641       2257                 
50434322010020041 JLV PALM BEACH LLC        1,564,580.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1985 03 03 01 2     753814       3838       4125       3324                 
50434322010020051 GIBSON SUSAN C        1,016,759.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1975 03 03 01 2     334183       3265       3614       2684                 
50434322010020060 SHAPIRO STEPHEN J & CURRAN EDWARD T       1,264,717.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1980 03 03 01 2     489090       4506       4776       3760                 
50434322010020081 DAIGH KEVIN A        1,481,138.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1975 03 03 01 2     434752       4126       4500       3338                 
50434322010020091 DELLAQUILA STEPHEN J & DONNA DELLAQUILA DONNA       655,923.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1980 04 04 01 2     405925       2795       3083       2461                 
50434322010020111 CERIALE JOHN        1,845,129.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1985 04 03 00 2     804400       4745       5008       4462                 
50434322010020130 HICKS ALEC JR & MAUREEN MAUREEN M HICKS       420,564.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1970 03 03 00 2     212227       2806       2974       2524                 
50434322010020140 PEARLMAN FAMILY LTD PRTNRSHP        2,409,909.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1980 05 05 01 2     788906       4889       5131       4099                 
50434322010020161 ZEIDMAN MARK S & ZEIDMAN MARGARET A       1,049,182.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1959 03 04 00 2     741610       3067       3260       2678                 
50434322010020171 MORGAN KEITH & MORGAN ALIXANDRA       1,680,107.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 00 03 01 2     629711       4600       5370       4066                 
50434322010020191 BYRNE PHILIP M        1,586,633.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1992 03 04 01 2     676789       4044       4438       3559                 
50434322010020211 MCCRACKEN JOHN B & CAROL MC CRACKEN CAROL       679,138.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 04 05 01 2     357790       4130       4590       3636                 
50434322010030011 HUTTIG BROOKE HUTTIG BROOKE TR       849,328.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1975 04 05 01 2     565977       4098       4180       3721                 
50434322010030012 KASSATLY EDWARD M & CAMILLE KASSATLY CAMILLE       1,391,576.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 04 06 01 2     592637       6125       6487       5536                 
50434322010030012 KASSATLY EDWARD M & CAMILLE KASSATLY CAMILLE       1,391,576.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1970 01 01 00 2     137540       1312       1341       1243                 
50434322010030030 CIKLIN ALAN J & LYNN E LYNN E CIKLIN       1,005,135.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1985 04 03 01 2     612241       4101       4427       3752                 
50434322010030041 STEPHAN A & CAROL J STEPHAN CAROL J       857,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1958 04 04 01 2     388784       5494       5887       4553                 
50434322020000010 CORNELL FRANCES B        3,946,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1990 00 01 00 1      36635        357        425        340                 
50434322020000010 CORNELL FRANCES B        3,946,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1990 05 04 01 2     772046       5311       5807       4472                 
50434322020000021 BONE WILLIAM D        1,727,560.00 0.4 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1990 05 05 00 2     960982       6386       7007       5779                 
50434322020000042 RINKER JOHN J RINKER SHEILA A       14,807,744.00 1.0169 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1995 02 01 00 1      91495        913        913        913                 
50434322020000042 RINKER JOHN J RINKER SHEILA A       14,807,744.00 1.0169 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 02 2    3086308      10030      11891       8457                 
50434322020000061 FOSTER RIDGELY M & FOSTER LETA A       2,473,389.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1960 04 04 01 2     451957       4915       5340       4332                 
50434322020000062 GOODHUE HELEN D        718,343.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1960 04 03 01 2     348823       4249       4670       3838                 
50434322020000071 WYCKOFF SHELBY P        1,475,156.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1952 07 05 00 2     305317       4968       5528       4087                 
50434322020000081 CROMPTON ROBERT S        1,205,192.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1985 04 05 00 2     970971       5652       5988       5306                 
50434322020000091 COWDEROY JAMES &        2,833,611.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1980 04 04 01 2     814669       5796       6527       5405                 
50434322030000011 ZACHER WILLIAM H &        4,103,878.00 0.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 04 06 00 2    1525256       6475       6997       5983                 
50434322030000012 FIVE VIA SUNNY TRUST LOURIE & CUTLER P C -WILLIAM J EISEN C/O       8,848,238.00 1.03 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 08 01 2    3049875       8013       9811       7176                 
50434322030000012 FIVE VIA SUNNY TRUST LOURIE & CUTLER P C -WILLIAM J EISEN C/O       8,848,238.00 1.03 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 02 02 00 2     164657       1640       1828       1200                 
50434322030000013 SESSA LEONARD        5,496,645.00 1.98 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 07 01 2    2579501      16352      19860      10587                 
50434322030000021 SMITH BARBARA & SMITH RANDALL       13,213,200.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322030000022 GULDEN MARY J        1,195,526.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 03 03 01 1     793036       3084       3219       2879                 
50434322030000023 SCHERER ALLAN D & MARGARET S SCHERER MARGARET S       2,020,407.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1963 05 06 01 2    1240991       9085      10285       8033                 
50434322030000024 130 COCOANUT ROW REALTY TRUST SNYDER JOHN G TRUSTEE &       3,478,614.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 04 03 01 2    1161911       5587       6085       5111                 
50434322030000025 GALLEY RICHARD &        3,556,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 2001 00 01 00 1      83397        807        969        429                 
50434322030000025 GALLEY RICHARD &        3,556,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 2001 03 03 01 2    1151710       4674       4775       4670                 
50434322030000031 FALCONE EDWARD & FALCONE FAYE       15,475,052.00 1.65 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1995 05 06 01 3    2297272      10508      12217       9318                 
50434322030000032 FALCONE EDWARD & FALCONE FAYE       2,300,000.00 0.3 VACANT                           
50434322030000033 KEAN IAN M        4,131,034.00 0.56 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1983 03 03 01 1     662074       4859       5597       4161                 
50434322030000034 KORNREICH MATTHEW R        1,959,268.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1980 04 04 00 1    1603118       4720       5422       4117                 
50434322040000030 WYNNS JAMES C & MARILYN H        1,496,479.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1935 00 01 00 1      21049        419        558        282                 
50434322040000030 WYNNS JAMES C & MARILYN H        1,496,479.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 04 03 00 2     546625       2701       2760       2760                 
50434322040000040 HURWITZ RONALD        832,008.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 04 03 00 2     580275       3478       3636       3438                 
50434322040000050 WILSON J S & CLARE L WILSON CLARE L       545,715.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1932 00 01 00 1      30027        612        720        360                 
50434322040000050 WILSON J S & CLARE L WILSON CLARE L       545,715.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1955 03 03 00 2     241290       2753       2808       2730                 
50434322040000060 STEPHAN A & CAROL J        924,998.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322040000070 CERIALE JOHN        3,019.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322040000320 VANHELLEMONT ROBERT W        2,420,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 00 01 00 1      76460       1068       1378        567                 
50434322040000320 VANHELLEMONT ROBERT W        2,420,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 03 03 01 2     270040       3148       3304       2816                 
50434322040000330 BERZON KAYE L BERZON KAYE L TR       2,495,796.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1988 01 02 00 2      97482       1058       1152        840                 
50434322040000330 BERZON KAYE L BERZON KAYE L TR       2,495,796.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1990 03 04 00 2     605007       3792       3980       3712                 
50434322040000340 PAYNE BETTY M        747,522.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1957 02 01 00 1       5368       1480       1868       1304                 
50434322040000350 CHENG KENNETH K & NANCY B NANCY B CHENG       1,001,169.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1929 00 01 00 2      44397        931       1306        477                 
50434322040000350 CHENG KENNETH K & NANCY B NANCY B CHENG       1,001,169.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 03 03 01 2     136837       3336       3336       3336                 
50434322040000360 RYAN DIANNE        5,069,544.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 04 01 2    1560460       5478       6387       4882                 
50434322040000370 RPI CORPORATION        7,033,011.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 08 09 01 2    3543620       6815       7828       6169                 
50434322040000380 CALLAWAY BRENDA T BESSEMER TRUST CO TR       5,423,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1932 01 03 00 2     170878       3384       4051       2518                 
50434322040000380 CALLAWAY BRENDA T BESSEMER TRUST CO TR       5,423,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1990 05 06 01 2    1989283       9088       9268       9010                 
50434322040000400 JANSSEN JANE H        1,075,454.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1936 00 01 00 1      36760       1010       1216        528                 
50434322040000400 JANSSEN JANE H        1,075,454.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1936 04 04 01 2     241308       5550       5810       5438                 
50434322040000410 CARTER C EDWARD JR        7,238,431.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 06 01 2    1457471       7896       9838       6616                 
50434322040000430 MILLER LEVERETT S & MILLER LINDA B       3,297,452.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 04 04 01 2     134373       5367       5636       5254                 
50434322040000430 MILLER LEVERETT S & MILLER LINDA B       3,297,452.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 00 01 00 1      93369       1428       1686        993                 
50434322040000440 SUMMERS ELIZABETH M        1,046,896.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1970 04 05 00 2     447656       4119       4418       3192                 
50434322040000450 BOSSIDY ALICE R BOSSIDY ALICE R TR       757,478.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 00 03 00 1       8369       2854       3407       2378                 
50434322040000460 HALMOS PETER A        5,582,917.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1988 05 07 00 2    1040990       8908      10219       8142                 
50434322040000480 BRODERICK CATHERINE M        3,896,151.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 03 03 00 2     427799       4115       4695       3918                 
50434322040000490 HERBERT LAWRENCE & HERBERT MICHELE       6,183,396.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 06 07 02 2    2752415       7372       9149       6433                 
50434322040000500 BRODSKY DAVID CAROLYN S BRODSKY       2,593,936.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 05 07 00 2    1076274       6185       6919       5324                 
50434322040000510 SINCLAIR CHRISTOPHER A &        4,665,874.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 00 02 00 2     136279       1730       2065        997                 
50434322040000510 SINCLAIR CHRISTOPHER A &        4,665,874.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 05 05 01 2    3231225       6413       7093       6201                 
50434322040000520 HASSEN THOMAS E        5,645,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 06 01 2    3030418       7926       8984       7015                 
50434322040000530 CALICCHIO MILLICENT        4,143,696.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1960 00 02 00 1      66855       1261       1624        720                 
50434322040000530 CALICCHIO MILLICENT        4,143,696.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1991 00 05 00 2     618992       4239       4470       4050                 
50434322040000540 LEIGH GEOFFREY & LEIGH SYLVIA       5,345,187.00 0.43 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 08 00 2    1894316       7003       8152       6308                 
50434322040000550 ROBINSON EDWARD J        3,682,804.00 0.43 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1997 00 07 01 2    1871492       8670       9634       7524                 
50434322040000561 WAGNER WILLIAM G WAGNER JO ANNE       1,450,629.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1980 03 03 00 2     317950       3464       3494       3444                 
50434322040000561 WAGNER WILLIAM G WAGNER JO ANNE       1,450,629.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1975 00 02 00 1      70782        760        760        760                 
50434322040000562 DLU LLC        4,075,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 01 2    1955373       5839       6472       5205                 
50434322040000580 WINCHESTER VALERIE J        7,311,448.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    4341191       9673      11049       8968                 
50434322040000600 IDY JOSEPH M & SUSAN K IDY SUSAN K       1,084,996.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1957 00 03 01 2     536919       4342       4468       4216                 
50434322040000600 IDY JOSEPH M & SUSAN K IDY SUSAN K       1,084,996.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 00 01 00 1     172270        949       1310        400                 
50434322040000610 TOWNSEND MARSHALL MEREDITH H & MARSHALL JAMES O III       3,794,770.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 2     109044       1810       1960       1460                 
50434322040000610 TOWNSEND MARSHALL MEREDITH H & MARSHALL JAMES O III       3,794,770.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 04 03 01 2     620009       4469       4911       4419                 
50434322040000621 ROGERS DOYLE ROGERS BARBARA M       5,569,069.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 06 03 2    4278598       8288       9316       7617                 
50434322040000640 MARCUS JEFFREY A        3,421,444.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 04 05 00 1      21444       4342       5199       3419                 
50434322040000650 ATKINSON JOHN        2,849,230.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 06 01 2    1184995       7209       8168       6445                 
50434322040000660 GASIUNASEN ARIJ        3,964,461.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1990 05 05 00 2    1092164       5485       5772       5023                 
50434322040000670 HEATHWOOD DESMOND J &        7,681,124.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1980 02 01 00 2     159015       1920       2208       1344                 
50434322040000670 HEATHWOOD DESMOND J &        7,681,124.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1990 04 06 00 2    1699674       5247       5652       4726                 
50434322040000670 HEATHWOOD DESMOND J &        7,681,124.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 00 01 00 1      95151        994       1231        735                 
50434322040000690 TRACY MARILYN E TR        3,453,415.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322040000700 TRACY MARILYN E TRACY MARILYN E TR       3,541,496.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1991 04 04 01 2    1723386       6112       6626       5891                 
50434322040000700 TRACY MARILYN E TRACY MARILYN E TR       3,541,496.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1995 00 01 00 1      88359        845       1056        528                 
50434322040000710 HUMMEL DENNIS & JOAN        2,953,568.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1962 00 03 00 1      10534       2986       3160       2580                 
50434322050000010 KOCH DAVID H TR        35,513,912.00 1.9377 SINGLE FAMILY 1917 1992 05 07 01 3    1424471       8996      10523       7811                 
50434322050000010 KOCH DAVID H TR        35,513,912.00 1.9377 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 2001 13 20 01 2   10432545      19556      23194      17920                 
50434322050000050 ROSS E BURKE JR & AMORY L ROSS ET AL TR HLDRS       7,430,638.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 09 10 01 2    2369553      13711      16939      12096                 
50434322050000061 ECCLESTONE EDWIN L JR REPUBLIC SECURITY BANK TR       6,109,201.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1998 00 09 01 2    4451725      15183      19004      13676                 
50434322050000061 ECCLESTONE EDWIN L JR REPUBLIC SECURITY BANK TR       6,109,201.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1      90279        644       1072          1                 
50434322050000070 SCHWARZMAN STEPHEN A BLACKSTONE GRP C/O       7,196,338.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 05 07 01 2    3738368       9829      11499       8794                 
50434322050000080 THOMAS JACK E JR TR & THOMAS DEBORAH T TR       6,633,814.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 00 01 00 2      77244       1050       1228        636                 
50434322050000080 THOMAS JACK E JR TR & THOMAS DEBORAH T TR       6,633,814.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1980 00 01 00 1      27498        326        351        288                 
50434322050000080 THOMAS JACK E JR TR & THOMAS DEBORAH T TR       6,633,814.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 04 05 01 2    3060596       5864       6037       5790                 
50434322050000090 114 CLARKE AVENUE LAND TRUST KRASKER PAUL A TRUSTEE       4,347,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 05 01 2     887872       5993       7495       5019                 
50434322050000100 WOOD PETER J        4,857,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 01 00 1      82100        823        968        484                 
50434322050000100 WOOD PETER J        4,857,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 05 01 2    1295019       5920       6214       5794                 
50434322050000111 SCOROPOSKI JAMES & LIDWINA        4,236,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 04 03 01 2     619415       3890       4009       3828                 
50434322050000111 SCOROPOSKI JAMES & LIDWINA        4,236,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 01 01 1      32040        314        314        314                 
50434322050000111 SCOROPOSKI JAMES & LIDWINA        4,236,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 04 02 00 2     123336       1433       1524       1286                 
50434322050000120 SWINDLE PATRICIA W        1,690,602.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 05 04 01 3    1294196       6860       9397       5816                 
50434322050000130 LEMOLE GERALD M &        5,163,639.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1960 00 01 00 1      84395       1024       1202        715                 
50434322050000130 LEMOLE GERALD M &        5,163,639.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1995 05 05 01 3    1608331       6680       7103       6485                 
50434322050000140 SHIELDS DIANA L        1,404,955.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 05 05 01 2     906920       7117       7763       6284                 
50434322050000150 GOOCH JOHN H & GOOCH VIRGINIA B       3,991,742.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 04 05 01 2     764024       4253       4575       4004                 
50434322050000160 KIRLIN JOHN J & JOHN J KIRLIN ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       2,026,700.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1986 00 01 00 1      87366        936       1100        625                 
50434322050000160 KIRLIN JOHN J & JOHN J KIRLIN ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       2,026,700.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1986 04 05 00 3    1352594       6715       7307       6497                 
50434322050000160 KIRLIN JOHN J & JOHN J KIRLIN ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       2,026,700.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1986 00 02 00 1      36927        379        570        297                 
50434322050000170 COWELL CASEY        6,800,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 05 05 01 2    1095285      10742      12389       9261                 
50434322050000180 HARRISON MARY T        1,016,918.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1970 00 03 00 1     121104       3419       3467       3399                 
50434322050000200 FORBES LYDIA        3,690,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1990 03 04 01 2    1575781       5741       5938       5674                 
50434322050000200 FORBES LYDIA        3,690,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 02 02 00 2      85722       1108       1334        700                 
50434322050000210 WISSA SHAKIR        3,503,068.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 00 02 00 2      60341       1191       1434        930                 
50434322050000210 WISSA SHAKIR        3,503,068.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 03 03 01 2     386669       3678       3871       3590                 
50434322050000221 PRESSLY JAMES G JR &        1,000,715.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 03 01 2     195715       2465       2584       2250                 
50434322050000222 AHDAB MISBAH M        2,920,453.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 03 04 00 2     954146       7844       8974       7052                 
50434322050000222 AHDAB MISBAH M        2,920,453.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1992 00 02 00 2     118750       1566       1924       1209                 
50434322050000231 CLARKE AVENUE INVESTMENTS INC MCDONALD HOPKINS CO PA /J METZGER       2,760,495.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322050000232 CLARKE AVENUE INVESTMENTS INC        4,872,166.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 2000 05 07 01 2    1383299       6327       6656       5833                 
50434322050000233 170 BARTON AVENUE LLC GEORGIANA SLADE/MILBANK TWEED C/O       5,549,157.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1970 00 01 00 2     121399       1486       1748        874                 
50434322050000233 170 BARTON AVENUE LLC GEORGIANA SLADE/MILBANK TWEED C/O       5,549,157.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1975 05 05 01 2    1963722       7953       8649       7658                 
50434322050000260 PARKER PATRICK S        4,383,310.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1931 1996 02 03 01 1     797378       4109       4109       4109                 
50434322050000260 PARKER PATRICK S        4,383,310.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 03 04 00 1     112874       1420       1503       1227                 
50434322050000271 ANNAN HOPE P        1,201,201.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1970 01 02 01 1     448361       2827       2827       2827                 
50434322050000271 ANNAN HOPE P        1,201,201.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1978 02 02 00 1     141545       1938       2383       1525                 
50434322050000280 KIRKBRIDE WALTER T KIRKBRIDE SUSAN S       1,665,295.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1985 04 05 01 1      46751       4649       5040       4126                 
50434322050000290 GALLANT ANTOINETTE CHARLES GALLANT GST QTIPS TRUST       3,001,230.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1945 00 02 00 1.5      86500       2047       2428       1378                 
50434322050000290 GALLANT ANTOINETTE CHARLES GALLANT GST QTIPS TRUST       3,001,230.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 05 07 01 3    1372463      10801      11884      10197                 
50434322050000320 AMERICAN TEL & TEL CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT C/O       108,675.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322050000330 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 2.67 MUNICIPAL                           
50434322060000030 JORDAN GERALD & JORDAN DARLENE       14,033,786.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1979 00 03 00 2     208515       2382       3214        975                 
50434322060000030 JORDAN GERALD & JORDAN DARLENE       14,033,786.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1998 05 08 01 1    3674780      14658      16160      13388                 
50434322060000051 VAN HELLEMONT ROBERT W        2,311,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 05 01 2     626694       3967       4627       2974                 
50434322060000101 KELLOGG CHARLOTTE T TRUST        1,361,797.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1944 00 01 00 2      52783        814        814        814                 
50434322060000101 KELLOGG CHARLOTTE T TRUST        1,361,797.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1975 03 03 01 2     255232       3366       4256       3086                 
50434322060000130 CRANDALL CHAUNCEY W & DEBORAH CRANDALL DEBORAH       1,360,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1975 03 02 00 2     142524       2097       2126       2126                 
50434322060000170 HOWE JAMES H III & HOWE ELIZABETH S       2,701,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 04 04 01 2     972463       4720       5252       4269                 
50434322060000180 LOVETTE BRADFORD S & IKUYO OHIGASHI H/W       563,321.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1921 1968 00 01 00 1      52924        600        618        558                 
50434322060000180 LOVETTE BRADFORD S & IKUYO OHIGASHI H/W       563,321.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1970 03 04 00 2     199170       2852       2965       2805                 
50434322060000231 CRANDALL CHAUNCEY W IV &        1,093,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1985 03 03 00 2     498067       2912       3075       2965                 
50434322060000260 WULSIN HENRY H &        1,712,627.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 05 03 00 2     410163       3540       3848       3212                 
50434322060000260 WULSIN HENRY H &        1,712,627.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1980 00 02 00 2     189543        792        880        660                 
50434322060000290 DEMATTEIS LYNN M & DEMATTEIS RICHARD F       3,364,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 2    1420666       5002       5515       4588                 
50434322060000340 HANLEY DANIEL A & DENISE A HANLEY DENISE A       506,631.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 03 03 01 2     935970       3487       3668       3437                 
50434322060000370 MILLER ELAINE G 2005 TRUST &        2,126,038.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1990 03 03 01 2     439077       3630       4547       3006                 
50434322060000400 KASS NANETTE        679,165.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 02 01 00 2     225561       2418       2640       2160                 
50434322060000430 BLADES JOHN W & ANN M BLADES ANN M       329,037.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 03 02 00 2     143756       1955       2164       1838                 
50434322060000440 LUNT LAWRENCE F &        1,839,819.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1940 01 01 00 1      52971        767       1041        401                 
50434322060000440 LUNT LAWRENCE F &        1,839,819.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 03 03 00 2     565237       2361       2445       2315                 
50434322060000470 LOWE ELIZABETH B        1,214,830.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1975 03 03 00 2     104713       1702       1786       1576                 
50434322060000480 GRUBMAN CLAY H        267,133.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 02 02 00 2     165082       2347       2717       1984                 
50434322060000550 GOLDBERG RICHARD        568,592.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 00 03 01 2     443257       3027       3237       2743                 
50434322060000560 FIRST PALM BEACH PROP INC        1,372,614.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1933 00 02 00 1      65310       1255       1600        760                 
50434322060000560 FIRST PALM BEACH PROP INC        1,372,614.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1965 02 02 00 2     210853       1807       1998       1680                 
50434322060000600 SERZAN JAMES V SERZAN JAMES V TR       629,719.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1950 01 01 00 1       3543       1084       1100        990                 
50434322060000600 SERZAN JAMES V SERZAN JAMES V TR       629,719.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2       3489       1229       1473        660                 
50434322060000610 GOODMAN J JOHN & GOODMAN JUDITH B       629,477.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 00 03 01 2     368826       3557       3946       3128                 
50434322060000640 SPEER RAMSEY C        586,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 04 03 01 2     864487       3563       3950       3147                 
50434322060000670 YLVISAKER JANE        917,392.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2003 03 03 00 2     395591       2483       2726       2374                 
50434322060000680 WILM CHRISTA K        435,768.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1942 00 01 00 2      40231        641        720        522                 
50434322060000680 WILM CHRISTA K        435,768.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 03 03 00 2     373759       2172       2222       2190                 
50434322060000710 ANTLE MARY LOUISE J        2,129,989.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     667687       4044       4213       3708                 
50434322060000720 JOSEPHBERG ROBERT H &        1,344,400.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 02 02 00 1     170582       1922       2101       1697                 
50434322060000760 MEANEY BARBAREE P BARBAREE MEANEY TRUST       1,906,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 03 00 2      31499       2982       3636       2776                 
50434322060000760 MEANEY BARBAREE P BARBAREE MEANEY TRUST       1,906,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 00 01 00 2       3179        681        736        552                 
50434322060000770 STEVENS MARK        3,605,304.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 04 03 2    1340855       4701       5493       4251                 
50434322060000840 BOURNE ERNEST C        1,213,727.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 03 03 01 1     198297       2199       2436       2028                 
50434322060000850 GAROFALO JOHN & THERESA V        1,420,048.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1985 00 02 00 1     195137       1866       1884       1884                 
50434322060000880 JOHNSON MARIANNE O        1,338,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 02 01 00 2      91428       1050       1162       1022                 
50434322060000880 JOHNSON MARIANNE O        1,338,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 04 03 01 2    1277757       2875       3268       2720                 
50434322060000890 GAROFALO JOHN        1,270,756.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1955 02 03 00 2      49308       1265       1265       1265                 
50434322060000930 MARTIN J E & MARTIN DOROTHY S       283,326.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1980 00 02 00 2     109128       1718       1987       1626                 
50434322060000960 SCHULHOF R MARK        1,944,726.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1995 00 02 00 1     107091       1173       1257       1152                 
50434322060000960 SCHULHOF R MARK        1,944,726.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1995 03 03 00 2     614726       2802       2802       2802                 
50434322060000970 BARONE THOMAS J & RUTTLE TERRI       473,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 02 03 01 2     272237       2087       2328       1710                 
50434322060001000 SORGENTI HAROLD A SORGENTI ANN R       1,476,210.00 0.2812 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1985 04 02 01 2     524220       2973       3102       2948                 
50434322060001000 SORGENTI HAROLD A SORGENTI ANN R       1,476,210.00 0.2812 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 02 02 01 2     386498       2570       2907       2212                 
50434322060001010 GRECO RALPH J & VERA M GRECO VERA M       291,888.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1933 00 01 00 1        931        324        332        312                 
50434322060001010 GRECO RALPH J & VERA M GRECO VERA M       291,888.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1944 02 02 00 2       4109       1678       1943       1616                 
50434322060001050 ROONEY SEAN        1,433,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1985 00 01 00 1       4046        779        946        582                 
50434322060001050 ROONEY SEAN        1,433,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 03 03 00 1      27011       2260       2282       2250                 
50434322060001080 MAKK LASZLO & CAROLYN C        1,428,795.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 03 03 00 2     168006       2330       2605       2240                 
50434322060001080 MAKK LASZLO & CAROLYN C        1,428,795.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1955 00 01 00 2      38941        735        864        616                 
50434322060001110 PHILLIPS HARRY R III        1,222,994.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1944 03 02 00 2       5815       2073       2858       1767                 
50434322060001120 COHEN STANLEY M & COHEN ELAINE J       3,458,068.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 06 02 2    1261291       4437       5064       3928                 
50434322060001150 COULTER ANN H        1,730,926.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 00 01 00 2      76822        720        720        720                 
50434322060001150 COULTER ANN H        1,730,926.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 02 03 00 2     628101       2383       2398       2377                 
50434322060001190 BROOKS WILLIAM J & MARTHA F BROOKS MARTHA F       366,123.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 03 02 01 2     474214       2121       2182       2080                 
50434322060001200 BIANDA LAURO & BIANDA AREANY       2,251,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1955 03 03 01 2      20773       4113       4638       3669                 
50434322060001230 WILLIAMS OWEN & REBECCA REBECCA WILLIAMS       555,679.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1950 00 01 00 1      41998        514        618        300                 
50434322060001230 WILLIAMS OWEN & REBECCA REBECCA WILLIAMS       555,679.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 04 04 01 2     736600       3604       3845       3208                 
50434322060001280 SCULLEY JOHN        3,042,000.00 0.42 VACANT                           
50434322060001310 FELDMAN ROBERT M & FELDMAN AMY       683,769.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1975 03 03 01 2     686379       4100       4930       3586                 
50434322060001400 HAMILTON DAVID H & HAMILTON MARIA F       451,938.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 04 02 00 2      81417       1865       2016       1800                 
50434322060001410 218 SEA BREEZE LLC        2,486,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 03 03 00 2     249431       2565       2843       2363                 
50434322060001440 DE NICOLA RALPH M & DE NICOLA MARIA       341,467.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 03 03 00 2     290231       2295       2334       2334                 
50434322060001480 KOURNIKOVA ALLA        1,575,396.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 00 2     385802       2838       3061       2692                 
50434322060001490 LECATES FRANCIS A JR & LECATES CAROL M       3,878,384.00 0.4211 VACANT 1967 1970 00 01 00 1      86024       1117       1138       1138                 
50434322060001520 DE HOLGUIN BEATRICE        414,956.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1969 1974 03 03 00 1     183801       2448       2595       2162                 
50434322060001600 DEBRULE WILLIAM & DEBRULE MARTHA       4,453,737.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 07 07 01 2    3282028       7713       8491       7021                 
50434322060001610 BLANCO FRANCESCO BLANCO HOLLY       724,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1914 1975 03 03 01 3     408225       3156       3609       3036                 
50434322060001610 BLANCO FRANCESCO BLANCO HOLLY       724,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1975 00 01 00 1      89345       1114       1212       1104                 
50434322060001690 CARNEY LISA M        436,442.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1985 03 03 00 2     444242       2706       2878       2718                 
50434322060001720 SUMMERS RUTH A        1,602,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 1      54743        666        798        360                 
50434322060001720 SUMMERS RUTH A        1,602,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2001 03 03 00 2     735070       2590       2902       2517                 
50434322060001730 BISHOP WILDER & JASON R REGALBUTO H/W       770,115.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 01 01 2      70516        854       1016        488                 
50434322060001730 BISHOP WILDER & JASON R REGALBUTO H/W       770,115.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 00 2     690514       3114       3516       3014                 
50434322060001760 SIKLOSSY ELINOR BEIDLER BEIDLER FRANCIS III TR       2,028,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1975 04 03 01 2     316757       3698       3864       3426                 
50434322060001760 SIKLOSSY ELINOR BEIDLER BEIDLER FRANCIS III TR       2,028,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 01 00 2      92064       1110       1563        507                 
50434322060001760 SIKLOSSY ELINOR BEIDLER BEIDLER FRANCIS III TR       2,028,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 02 02 00 1      66890        736        736        736                 
50434322060001771 GARRISON ROBERT N &        2,048,768.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 03 00 3     611332       3422       4044       3158                 
50434322060001830 MYERS RICHARD P & MICHELE S MYERS MICHELE S       422,580.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1932 00 01 00 1      30524        475        565        265                 
50434322060001830 MYERS RICHARD P & MICHELE S MYERS MICHELE S       422,580.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 03 00 2     247078       3770       3818       3753                 
50434322060001870 GOLNICK GREG J & KAREN W GOLNICK KAREN W       440,562.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 01 00 2      55636        726        768        768                 
50434322060001870 GOLNICK GREG J & KAREN W GOLNICK KAREN W       440,562.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2003 03 03 00 3     253767       2541       2963       2419                 
50434322060001880 ZEMON RAY B ZEMON RAY B TR       2,534,815.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 04 03 01 3     979884       3665       4346       3384                 
50434322060001880 ZEMON RAY B ZEMON RAY B TR       2,534,815.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 01 01 00 1     107905       1016       1261        551                 
50434322060001911 ZEITZ DIANE R &        1,534,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 05 00 2      51585        478        647        300                 
50434322060001911 ZEITZ DIANE R &        1,534,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 04 02 02 2     286292       2421       2717       2291                 
50434322060001940 JONES KEITH A & JONES RENATA       688,773.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 1      71928        846       1040        520                 
50434322060001940 JONES KEITH A & JONES RENATA       688,773.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 05 05 00 3     498707       5768       6225       5292                 
50434322060001970 KENT SEBASTIAN A & LAURA A KENT LAURA A       918,724.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      73321       1021       1087        867                 
50434322060001970 KENT SEBASTIAN A & LAURA A KENT LAURA A       918,724.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 04 03 01 2    1113267       3964       4266       3904                 
50434322060002011 CARUFE SHERRY        1,903,531.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 01 00 2      74703        868       1128        476                 
50434322060002011 CARUFE SHERRY        1,903,531.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 04 04 01 2    1210620       3614       4009       3505                 
50434322060002020 TUCKER BRUCE G & TUCKER JOANNE C       2,380,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1975 00 01 00 2      53184        520        672        294                 
50434322060002020 TUCKER BRUCE G & TUCKER JOANNE C       2,380,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1985 04 06 00 2    1024008       4800       5269       4653                 
50434322060002070 MCCONNELL JULIA        1,016,417.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 01 01 00 1      43076        604        719        346                 
50434322060002070 MCCONNELL JULIA        1,016,417.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 03 03 00 2     443658       3113       3212       3071                 
50434322060002110 ROHRIG CAROL        1,515,639.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      49127        651        892        348                 
50434322060002110 ROHRIG CAROL        1,515,639.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1960 03 03 00 2     298649       2995       3180       2917                 
50434322060002120 DOLLENS SUSAN S        2,422,013.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1999 04 03 01 3    1355820       4565       4894       4281                 
50434322060002150 WARD JAMES J III        1,384,481.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1913 1965 00 01 01 2      78128        884        960        708                 
50434322060002150 WARD JAMES J III        1,384,481.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1913 1985 03 02 00 2     585172       3070       3093       3093                 
50434322060002160 CONNELLY MICHAEL TRUST CONNELLY MICHAEL J TRUSTEE       2,201,341.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 04 03 01 2     968689       3817       4260       3380                 
50434322060002190 VALENTI FORTUNATO N & RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES C/O       2,778,976.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1957 00 01 00 1      29220        375        375        375                 
50434322060002190 VALENTI FORTUNATO N & RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES C/O       2,778,976.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 04 03 01 3     715939       4474       4583       4513                 
50434322060002230 HEBERLEIN JULIE A & REVELEY ROBERT J       3,413,063.00 0.9168 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 02 01 00 1     161606       2127       2776       1334                 
50434322060002230 HEBERLEIN JULIE A & REVELEY ROBERT J       3,413,063.00 0.9168 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 05 05 01 2     803802       5798       6022       5704                 
50434322070003010 JORDAN GERALD & JORDAN DARLENE       12,900,062.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1998 04 05 00 1     247113       2504       2504       2504                 
50434322070003071 SHIPMAN ROBERT D &        2,914,830.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1944 01 02 00 1      55844        986       1216        572                 
50434322070003071 SHIPMAN ROBERT D &        2,914,830.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1997 03 03 01 2    1458462       2961       3422       2757                 
50434322070003100 UDDEHOLM CORP        1,553,337.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1976 00 02 01 2     336537       2227       2743       1899                 
50434322070003140 NOTTINGHAM ELIZABETH L        1,642,082.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 00 01 00 1      28880        376        396        396                 
50434322070003140 NOTTINGHAM ELIZABETH L        1,642,082.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1995 03 03 00 2     977764       2806       2950       2770                 
50434322070003150 KAUFMANN CHRISTOPHER &        3,925,832.00 0.5559 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 02 02 00 1      98118       1315       1406       1196                 
50434322070003150 KAUFMANN CHRISTOPHER &        3,925,832.00 0.5559 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 02 01 00 2      84604        713        792        594                 
50434322070003150 KAUFMANN CHRISTOPHER &        3,925,832.00 0.5559 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1998 03 03 01 2    1330863       2895       3286       2522                 
50434322070003150 KAUFMANN CHRISTOPHER &        3,925,832.00 0.5559 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 02 02 00 1     117790       1170       1170       1170                 
50434322070003150 KAUFMANN CHRISTOPHER &        3,925,832.00 0.5559 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1985 00 01 00 1      27166        310        352        316                 
50434322070003180 GIBBONS CHRISTINE GIBBONS CHRISTINE TR       680,108.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 03 02 01 2     569080       2985       3183       2931                 
50434322070003210 THOMPSON JAMES & THOMPSON SANDRA N       2,278,954.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 04 03 01 2    1409269       4465       5862       3446                 
50434322070003221 STEINHART PERCIVAL P III        615,089.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1970 03 03 00 1      11570       2649       3029       2122                 
50434322070003271 DAVIDSON GORDON C DAVIDSON BARBARA       1,629,519.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1935 01 01 00 1      49221        824        969        485                 
50434322070003271 DAVIDSON GORDON C DAVIDSON BARBARA       1,629,519.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 04 04 00 2    1176063       4682       4768       4488                 
50434322070003300 MAHANEY LANCE D & PATRICIA PATRICIA MAHANEY       779,709.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 04 04 00 2     848547       4561       4706       4222                 
50434322070003330 FERGUSON THOMAS M & FERGUSON LISA P       1,490,628.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 02 02 00 2      65053        874        874        874                 
50434322070003330 FERGUSON THOMAS M & FERGUSON LISA P       1,490,628.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 03 00 2     292239       2918       3053       2873                 
50434322070003360 AINSLIE MICHAEL L AINSLIE SUZANNE H       2,818,478.00 0.5624 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 04 04 01 3    2403104       6335       7173       5798                 
50434322070003360 AINSLIE MICHAEL L AINSLIE SUZANNE H       2,818,478.00 0.5624 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1995 03 03 00 1     156522       1683       1683       1683                 
50434322070003410 BENDAT STEVE & BENDAT AYA       2,841,490.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 05 01 2    1712399       3850       4473       3388                 
50434322070003471 DELLA GIUSTINA JOSEPH A        220,055.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 00 04 00 3     178752       2438       2716       2144                 
50434322070003472 THOMPSON ELIZABETH S        0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 01 01 01 2      80895        960        971        896                 
50434322070003550 TURNER MARY F        668,292.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1985 03 03 01 2     684682       3087       3366       2582                 
50434322070003560 MURRAY SCOTT C & MURRAY JAMIE M       913,233.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 00 01 00 1      40077        500        588        294                 
50434322070003560 MURRAY SCOTT C & MURRAY JAMIE M       913,233.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 03 03 00 2     173090       2361       2476       2146                 
50434322070003591 BRIGGS LAMAR & NANCY NANCY BRIGGS       356,335.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1970 02 01 00 1      92627       1543       1693       1537                 
50434322070003601 LORENTZEN CORNELIA M        1,033,082.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1980 03 04 00 1     262973       2441       2594       2216                 
50434322070003630 CLARK JAMES MCCONNELL        1,898,149.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 01 01 00 1      53751        575        690        306                 
50434322070003630 CLARK JAMES MCCONNELL        1,898,149.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 03 03 00 2     327565       3218       3486       2780                 
50434322070003660 CALLAHAN RICHARD P & CYNTHIA H CALLAHAN CYNTHIA H       784,543.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1960 01 02 00 1      49670        587        688        507                 
50434322070003660 CALLAHAN RICHARD P & CYNTHIA H CALLAHAN CYNTHIA H       784,543.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1965 01 02 00 1      78356        979       1152        576                 
50434322070003660 CALLAHAN RICHARD P & CYNTHIA H CALLAHAN CYNTHIA H       784,543.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1970 04 03 01 2     789302       3948       4092       3912                 
50434322070003690 DONAHUE JAMES B DONAHUE LINDA P       2,389,427.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 05 05 01 2    1116428       7247       8256       6485                 
50434322070003740 TORRES RICK O & HEIDI A HEIDI A TORRES       476,591.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1937 01 01 00 1      30652        580        580        580                 
50434322070003740 TORRES RICK O & HEIDI A HEIDI A TORRES       476,591.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 03 00 2     308156       2502       2700       2144                 
50434322070003780 BITTING GEORGE C TR        623,235.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1966 02 02 00 1       5856       1455       1575       1275                 
50434322070003810 LUCKS JOHN E JR & CHERYL        1,108,572.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1970 02 02 00 1       4189       1210       1235       1199                 
50434322070003820 PEPPER CHARLES W & ANNE C PEPPER ANNE C       539,493.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 03 03 00 1      38451       2861       2974       2428                 
50434322070003850 STOIA BARBARA S        616,058.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1935 00 01 00 1      26998        440        440        440                 
50434322070003850 STOIA BARBARA S        616,058.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1944 1980 00 03 00 1     270939       2839       3049       2749                 
50434322070003900 COHEN JEFFREY        2,240,305.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 01 00 1      37277        387        484        242                 
50434322070003900 COHEN JEFFREY        2,240,305.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 03 03 01 2     514992       3120       3228       3093                 
50434322070003930 SPAZIANI MICHAEL V        440,569.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 02 02 00 2     116714       2244       2638       1768                 
50434322070003960 SCHEERER JOSEPH & SCHEERER SANDRA       949,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 02 02 00 2      89809       2082       2126       1856                 
50434322070003970 SHAW LESLIE A & DORIS A SHAW DORIS A       688,393.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 00 01 00 1     105541       1338       1496        968                 
50434322070003970 SHAW LESLIE A & DORIS A SHAW DORIS A       688,393.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 04 03 00 2     354014       3909       4008       3348                 
50434322070004020 KOZOKOFF NEIL        1,569,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 02 02 00 2     281879       2022       2086       1994                 
50434322070004020 KOZOKOFF NEIL        1,569,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1990 01 01 00 1      60258        580        580        580                 
50434322070004050 GAROFALO JOHN A & GAROFALO TERESA       1,518,117.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 03 03 01 2     412823       2397       2505       2170                 
50434322070004060 HANSEN EDWARD A & HANSEN JULIA S       3,055,567.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 04 04 01 2     868039       6125       6307       5725                 
50434322070004090 PACK RONALD E & LISA J        2,130,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1940 01 01 00 1      48213        748        880        440                 
50434322070004090 PACK RONALD E & LISA J        2,130,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 00 03 00 2      67133       2414       2475       2338                 
50434322070004140 ADLER MARVIN        547,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 01 01 00 1      49366        716        846        522                 
50434322070004140 ADLER MARVIN        547,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 03 03 00 2     208825       2498       2728       2398                 
50434322070004170 MYERS JANE B MYERS JANE B TR       338,535.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1970 00 01 00 1      28973        444        444        444                 
50434322070004170 MYERS JANE B MYERS JANE B TR       338,535.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1970 03 02 00 2     201794       2668       2706       2450                 
50434322070004200 KINSELLA ETHEL D ETHEL D LINDSEY TR TI HLDR       864,750.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1939 02 01 00 1      71674       1212       1426        713                 
50434322070004200 KINSELLA ETHEL D ETHEL D LINDSEY TR TI HLDR       864,750.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 04 03 01 2     396029       4117       4509       3638                 
50434322070004210 PRESSLY J G JR & PRESSLY KATHRYN       1,250,794.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1945 00 01 00 2      21345        353        364        364                 
50434322070004210 PRESSLY J G JR & PRESSLY KATHRYN       1,250,794.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1970 00 03 00 2     127772       1851       1911       1611                 
50434322070004250 ISARD MARGARET E &        611,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 02 03 00 1      68111       1746       1892       1470                 
50434322070004281 ODONNELL PETER J & ODONNELL SARAH Y       1,795,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 03 03 01 2     283616       3091       3288       3018                 
50434322070004281 ODONNELL PETER J & ODONNELL SARAH Y       1,795,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2      84524        885       1062        792                 
50434322070004290 FALKOFF ADAM S & FALKOFF ALISON G       1,253,070.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 02 02 00 1     152614       1791       1812       1782                 
50434322070004330 FICK RONALD L & MARCIA C FICK MARCIA C       315,550.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 00 03 01 3     194363       2582       2756       2213                 
50434322070004340 MCHUGH ROBERT J GILLESPIE M JOAN       708,333.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 02 03 01 2     571097       3125       3144       3096                 
50434322070004370 TURNER THOMAS C        1,634,743.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1950 00 01 00 2      48201        635        793        397                 
50434322070004370 TURNER THOMAS C        1,634,743.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 04 03 01 2     490462       2888       2928       2733                 
50434322070004380 MORGARIDGE MARVIN H        2,025,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1980 00 02 00 2     352113       2796       3554       2154                 
50434322070004410 HOHN RAINER F & HOHN BETTINA       928,920.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 01 01 00 1      51985        640        800        400                 
50434322070004410 HOHN RAINER F & HOHN BETTINA       928,920.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 03 03 00 2     362410       2444       2444       2444                 
50434322070004440 PLATT TATIANA & ZISKA MAURA A TR TITL HLDR       1,627,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1990 01 01 00 1      78596        806       1008        504                 
50434322070004440 PLATT TATIANA & ZISKA MAURA A TR TITL HLDR       1,627,518.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 03 03 00 2     428078       3025       3064       3008                 
50434322070004450 POLLOCK RICHARD M        1,172,984.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 01 00 1      56301        634        792        396                 
50434322070004450 POLLOCK RICHARD M        1,172,984.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 03 03 01 2     334328       2730       2763       2543                 
50434322070004480 DI FILIPPO RICHARD G & DI FILIPPO MARY F       808,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 03 03 01 2     206257       2611       2645       2596                 
50434322070004490 ZUVER DICK & JEAN A ZUVER JEAN A       403,577.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1941 04 03 01 2     347381       3786       4118       3368                 
50434322070004520 FOCKE LADY TANA        1,673,268.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 01 01 00 1      77208        958       1008       1008                 
50434322070004520 FOCKE LADY TANA        1,673,268.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 00 2     373360       2448       2624       2386                 
50434322070004530 QUINN OLIVER H        853,710.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1970 00 02 00 1      51638        585        632        580                 
50434322070004530 QUINN OLIVER H        853,710.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 00 02 00 2     281584       1958       2122       1897                 
50434322070004560 F G HOWARD JR ENTERPRISES INC        2,646,593.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 01 01 00 2      69196        681        801        401                 
50434322070004560 F G HOWARD JR ENTERPRISES INC        2,646,593.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 03 03 01 2     524890       3619       3898       3498                 
50434322070004570 SPROCK HOWARD M III        1,843,460.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 02 00 2     733034       2187       2230       2174                 
50434322070004611 PRESSLY DAVID S & PRESSLY MARY G       688,979.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1945 01 01 00 1      49428        628        694        576                 
50434322070004612 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC &        724,913.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1949 00 02 00 1      86093       1273       1348       1101                 
50434322070004660 CLEWIS JEANNE H & RANDOLPH A HOPKINS       1,278,768.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 00 03 01 2      92388       3217       3275       2890                 
50434322070004670 TYLANDER W H JR & GEORGIA M TYLANDER GEORGIA M       335,899.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1970 03 04 00 3     258475       3087       3556       2941                 
50434322070004700 MCLENNAN KATHERINE S        1,922,794.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1935 04 03 01 3      44514       3985       5243       3249                 
50434322070004710 MERCURIO SUSAN        359,966.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1939 00 01 00 1      37877        581        684        342                 
50434322070004710 MERCURIO SUSAN        359,966.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 03 03 00 2     198855       2727       2853       2491                 
50434322070004750 DEBIE JOAN F TR        343,814.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1939 01 01 00 1      45186        690        988        294                 
50434322070004750 DEBIE JOAN F TR        343,814.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 03 03 00 2     190680       2307       2382       1960                 
50434322070004780 SCAFF DAVID H & SCAFF ELIZABETH O       1,289,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1988 04 03 00 2     540048       3320       3853       2997                 
50434322070004780 SCAFF DAVID H & SCAFF ELIZABETH O       1,289,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 01 01 00 1      64473        882       1044        504                 
50434322070004790 NIEDEL JAMES & NIEDEL SELAINE       1,296,979.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 01 01 00 2      85094        921       1040        737                 
50434322070004790 NIEDEL JAMES & NIEDEL SELAINE       1,296,979.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 03 03 00 2    1352613       3036       3373       2948                 
50434322070004830 WOODFIELD GARY A & ALEXANDRA M WOODFIELD ALEXANDRA M       751,741.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 04 04 00 2     774614       5010       5501       4465                 
50434322070004840 STRICKLAND R MICHAEL & SUE A SUE A STRICKLAND       2,490,883.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 01 01 00 1     110670       1337       1691        644                 
50434322070004840 STRICKLAND R MICHAEL & SUE A SUE A STRICKLAND       2,490,883.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 04 04 01 3     972034       5844       6080       5604                 
50434322070004890 KLING JARRETT B & KLING JUDITH K       1,865,015.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1921 1990 03 02 00 2    1053411       3783       4048       3542                 
50434322070004950 WHETSELL SHERRILL A WHETSELL M H JR       812,986.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 03 01 3     306961       2244       2830       2098                 
50434322070004981 PENNOCK JEROME H        554,527.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1953 00 03 01 2     489410       4289       5056       3796                 
50434322070004990 ROVIN LILY        412,122.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 01 01 00 1      59095        672        672        672                 
50434322070004990 ROVIN LILY        412,122.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 03 03 01 2     477673       2690       2802       2642                 
50434322070005030 KLEIN GEORGE & LAURA KLEIN LAURA       505,646.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 03 03 00 1     472157       2807       2889       2615                 
50434322070005040 PRESSLY JAMES G JR & KATHRYN S PRESSLY KATHRYN S       611,367.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1975 03 03 00 2     473444       3462       3630       3047                 
50434322070005040 PRESSLY JAMES G JR & KATHRYN S PRESSLY KATHRYN S       611,367.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 02 02 00 2      94746       1060       1150        851                 
50434322070005090 GREENWALD STEVEN JEFFREY        898,379.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 02 01 00 1     106063       1428       1750        875                 
50434322070005090 GREENWALD STEVEN JEFFREY        898,379.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 03 03 00 2     453890       3566       4062       3076                 
50434322070005100 LAND TRUST AGREEMENT SEPT 2 1999        1,716,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1935 01 01 00 1      33446        576        720        360                 
50434322070005100 LAND TRUST AGREEMENT SEPT 2 1999        1,716,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 03 03 00 2     464984       2881       3048       2696                 
50434322070005140 GARRISON WAYNE & GARRISON PAMELA P       2,284,747.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 01 01 00 2      55803        792        792        792                 
50434322070005140 GARRISON WAYNE & GARRISON PAMELA P       2,284,747.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 04 03 00 3     537403       4195       5720       3615                 
50434322070005170 COCHRANE MARY M        930,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 01 01 00 1      74315        706        882        441                 
50434322070005170 COCHRANE MARY M        930,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 04 03 01 2     582755       3827       4198       3734                 
50434322070005200 GARRISON WAYNE & GARRISON PAMELA       10,022,250.00 0.752 VACANT                           
50434322070005271 MCGOVERN KEVIN M &        7,081,781.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1990 05 06 01 3     778836       8064       8722       7423                 
50434322070005271 MCGOVERN KEVIN M &        7,081,781.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 1      21200        205        341          1                 
50434322070005272 KARMAN CAROLYN L KARMAN CAROLYN L TR       1,461,286.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 00 02 00 3     590045       2924       4176       2096                 
50434322070005290 GARRISON WAYNE & GARRISON PAMELA       1,932,000.00 0.6652 VACANT                           
50434322080006062 ASRANI AJIT        363,976.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 00 03 01 3     401756       4026       4280       4076                 
50434322080006100 THOMPSON JAMES & THOMPSON SANDRA       1,436,597.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 02 02 00 1     321543       2273       2338       2338                 
50434322080006100 THOMPSON JAMES & THOMPSON SANDRA       1,436,597.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 01 01 00 1      47514        490        490        490                 
50434322080006260 3737 CORP        1,122,001.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1970 02 02 00 1     118141       1711       1890       1563                 
50434322080006300 LETTS DOROTHY W        303,690.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1952 00 02 00 2      42194        630        630        630                 
50434322080006300 LETTS DOROTHY W        303,690.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 00 02 00 1     107943       1437       1483       1279                 
50434322080006340 VAN ANDEL PETER        370,916.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1965 02 02 00 1     191982       2170       2362       1742                 
50434322080006400 413 SEAVIEW AVENUE LLC GEORGE DIONISOPOULOS C/O       1,228,787.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1940 00 01 00 2      42055        722        760        760                 
50434322080006400 413 SEAVIEW AVENUE LLC GEORGE DIONISOPOULOS C/O       1,228,787.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 03 03 00 2     172937       2463       2516       2440                 
50434322080006440 GRUSKIN LESLIE        1,739,260.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 03 03 00 1     187229       2034       2417       1706                 
50434322080006561 BENK PAUL        831,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1980 01 01 00 1     137437        979        979        979                 
50434322080006562 BAKER JANE B        254,058.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1943 1980 00 02 00 1     110001       1176       1211       1175                 
50434322080006640 PALM BEACH DAY SCHOOL        0.00 3.2172 PRV SCHL/COLL 1937 1965 02 02 00 1     158747       1529       1611       1286 1959 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1533210      21320         
50434322080006640 PALM BEACH DAY SCHOOL        0.00 3.2172 PRV SCHL/COLL 1937 1965 02 02 00 1     158747       1529       1611       1286 1970 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     678170       9454         
50434322080006640 PALM BEACH DAY SCHOOL        0.00 3.2172 PRV SCHL/COLL 1937 1965 02 02 00 1     158747       1529       1611       1286 1983 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2636060      25902         
50434322080006640 PALM BEACH DAY SCHOOL        0.00 3.2172 PRV SCHL/COLL 1937 1965 02 02 00 1     158747       1529       1611       1286 2001 2001 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1605240      12112         
50434322080007540 HANLEY DANIEL A TR LIST MANAGEMENT CO C/O       723,131.00 0 STORES           1940 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     115170       1095         
50434322080007581 HANLEY DANIEL A TR LIST MANAGEMENT CO C/O       1,771,307.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     504420       5620         
50434322080007582 HANLEY DANIEL A TR LIST MANAGEMENT CO C/O       1,175,340.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     454060       5592         
50434322080007660 AGINCOURT REALTY TRUST TRAFALGAR ASSET CORP C/O       3,129,634.00 0 STORES           1959 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     701180      10810         
50434322080007761 MYURA ANTHONY J & PATRICIA A MYURA PATRICIA A       476,649.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1935 01 01 00 1      36312        741        860        464                 
50434322080007761 MYURA ANTHONY J & PATRICIA A MYURA PATRICIA A       476,649.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1975 00 03 00 2     473695       2817       2897       2616                 
50434322080007821 BURT C OLIVER III        509,636.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1955 01 01 00 1      63178        774       1028        360                 
50434322080007821 BURT C OLIVER III        509,636.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1965 03 02 01 2     337478       2394       2781       2100                 
50434322080007881 FIRESTONE JOHN D TRUST FIRESTONE JOHN D TRUSTEE       1,810,012.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1960 02 02 01 2      71435        922       1000        740                 
50434322080007881 FIRESTONE JOHN D TRUST FIRESTONE JOHN D TRUSTEE       1,810,012.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 03 03 00 1     210825       1990       2080       1720                 
50434322080007941 HANSEN HUNTER H & HANSEN SUE A       1,535,847.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1985 02 03 00 1     305554       1958       2300       1633                 
50434322080008000 JACKSON ANN B        1,959,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1965 03 03 00 2     435357       3440       3668       2914                 
50434322080008140 LYLE FINLEY REVOCABLE TR & FINLEY LYLE TRUSTEE       2,261,009.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1977 03 03 01 1     420585       2816       2816       2816                 
50434322080008260 230 SOUTH OCEAN LLC SIMPSON THACHER/C KIRKLAND C/O       9,522,991.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1992 02 02 00 2     189801       1911       2074       1530                 
50434322080008260 230 SOUTH OCEAN LLC SIMPSON THACHER/C KIRKLAND C/O       9,522,991.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1992 04 04 01 2    1341354       5480       5916       4856                 
50434322090000031 YASMINI INC MR. WILLIAM T. LOWES C/O       2,659,796.00 0.2119 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1990 02 02 01 2     708861       4099       4744       3782                 
50434322090000032 ADAMS JOSEPHINE B        1,511,027.00 0.2503 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1996 03 03 01 2     595504       3431       3592       3222                 
50434322090000041 KHAWLY TERESA K & KHAWLY MARY T       1,912,561.00 0.1326 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 02 03 00 1     247609       2394       2500       2145                 
50434322090000051 JAMES DANIEL H & JAMES SYLVIA S &       718,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1941 1948 00 02 00 1       4205       1409       1579       1318                 
50434322100000012 VOLK LILLIAN J VOLK JOHN K       861,828.00 0.26 STORE/OFF/RES 1926 1960 04 05 01 2     391357       7549       8330       6018 1926 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     115400       1865         
50434322100000052 PHIPPS PLAZA PARTNERS LLC        2,418,504.00 0.18 OFFICE 1 STORY           1926 2000 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1455910       6591         
50434322100000060 RUMBOUGH MARGARETHA W RUMBOUGH MARGARETHA W TR       2,092,859.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 01 2    1554397       4679       5026       4322                 
50434322100000070 ROSENFELD MARC &        1,980,052.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 03 03 01 2     863965       2693       2719       2686                 
50434322100000080 HARRIS LAMONT        1,640,484.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 04 03 00 1     570556       2740       2754       2754                 
50434322100000101 DE SOUSA ANNETTE        0.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 00 00 2     343126       1831       2020       1724                 
50434322100000102 CINQUE PARTNERS LTD        1,637,614.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1957 00 05 01 1     522214       5050       5176       4996                 
50434322100000110 270 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD CORP LOVE REALTY C/O       1,259,310.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1965 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     478150       5892         
50434322100000120 ECLECTIC INC & CARRIAGE HOUSE DECO INC       1,734,400.00 0 STORES           1929 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     524400       5183         
50434322170000010 STEINDL ETHEL J        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000020 5 E SOUTHLAKE TRUST ANN P FITZGERALD TR       131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000030 FITZGERALD ANN P TR & FITZGERALD W KEVIN TR       131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000040 GARDNER CLAIRE B TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000050 GARDNER CLAIRE B TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000060 BLACK SUSANNE TR        131,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1969    210     131250 
50434322170000070 DUPONT LEA        828,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1283100 
50434322170000080 HIGGINBOTHAM RICHARD A & HIGGINBOTHAM CAROLE M       1,273,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1271550 
50434322170000090 HIGGINBOTHAM RICHARD A &        895,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1969   1283     895650 
50434322170000100 HODNETT LESLIE Z TR        1,294,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1293100 
50434322170000110 LONG GORDON G LONG GORDON G TR       802,039.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1281550 
50434322170000120 NATORI KENNETH R &        1,281,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1281550 
50434322170000130 MACKINTOSH ELISABETH P ELISABETH PLANKINTON MACKINTOSH REV TRUS       760,342.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1331400 
50434322170000140 FREASE BELDEN A & FREASE DOLINA R       721,961.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1013250 
50434322170000150 WEISER EVELYN        250,624.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1293100 
50434322170000160 PLIMPTON HOLLIS W & PLIMPTON PEGGY L       1,304,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1303100 
50434322170000170 SENGE JURGEN & SENGE GABRIELE       1,293,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1291550 
50434322170000180 BLACK SUSANNE BLACK SUSANNE TR       287,225.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1291550 
50434322170000190 OLSHAN MARVIN L & OLSHAN ROSE       1,341,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1341400 
50434322170000200 SMITH ROBERT B        237,293.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1023250 
50434322170000210 HARTMAN CHARLOTTE B & BRYANT MARK       257,228.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1303100 
50434322170000220 EQUITABLE HOLDING CORP WILLIAM P VANNECK C/O       1,314,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1313100 
50434322170000230 MOORE WILLIAM H III & DOROTHY        1,301,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1301550 
50434322170000240 SOUTHLAKE ENTERPRISES CORP L S CHURCHILL C/O       1,301,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1301550 
50434322170000250 STEINDL ETHEL J        1,351,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1351400 
50434322170000260 FITZGERALD W KEVIN        1,034,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1033250 
50434322170000270 WATERMAN RICHARD        260,529.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1313100 
50434322170000290 MIRANDO FELIX A JR        250,133.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1311550 
50434322170000300 BROWNE H LEE & BROWNE JACQUELYN G       879,191.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1969   1741    1311550 
50434322170000310 CLUETT JEAN DANIELS CLUETT JEAN DANIELS TR       1,067,804.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1969   2064    1361400 
50434322170000320 5 E SOUTHLAKE TRUST ANN P FITZGERALD TR       1,044,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1969   1486    1043250 
50434322170000330 EADES VIRGINIA T        262,488.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1323100 
50434322170000340 LARKIN OWEN G        2,664,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0340 0400 CONDO 1969   4521    2662800 
50434322170000350 GARDNER CLARA B        507,462.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0350 0400 CONDO 1969   2705    1592850 
50434322170000360 ROBBINS SUSAN W ROBBINS RICHARD L       1,273,393.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0360 0400 CONDO 1969   2705    1592850 
50434322170000370 BENZ DOMINIQUE V        1,298,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO 0370 0400 CONDO 1969   1816    1298850 
50434322170000380 COFFIN MARTHA        469,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432217 SOUTHLAKE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1969    776     469350 
50434322180000010 SILLS JOHN TR        1,287,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0010 0400 CONDO 1973   3084    1287000 
50434322180000020 RIBAKOFF EUGENE J & EUGENE RIBAKOFF TR TITL HLDR       1,251,111.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0020 0400 CONDO 1973   6671    5497000 
50434322180000040 GANTCHER ALICE        4,277,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0040 0400 CONDO 1973   4978    4327000 
50434322180001010 PRENSKY HENRY D PRENSKY HENRY D TR       49,947.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     229000 
50434322180001020 BELLIVEAU BRYAN J & BELLIVEAU DEBORAH S       229,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     229000 
50434322180001030 SEIDEN HAROLD & JOAN SEIDEN JOAN       34,222.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     229000 
50434322180001040 DEMONTIGNY YVES B        334,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     329000 
50434322180001050 KUDLOW RUTH        412,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     406000 
50434322180001060 GROSSBERG RENEE TRUST GROSSBERG RENEE TR       364,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     359000 
50434322180001070 WOOD RENEE M        275,960.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     359000 
50434322180001080 CHASE MANHATTAN BANK NOVAK JUDITH S TR       359,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1080 0400 CONDO 1973    903     359000 
50434322180001110 NOLL S DARWIN TRUST SCOTT HAZEL       562,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1110 0400 CONDO 1973   1601     556000 
50434322180001120 ORAV HELLE R        368,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1120 0400 CONDO 1973    780     413000 
50434322180001130 BRENNER STANLEY B        49,031.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1130 0400 CONDO 1973   1230     412000 
50434322180001140 GORDON BENJAMIN & GORDON ELIZABETH L       784,549.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1140 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     931000 
50434322180001200 RIBAKOFF EUGENE J TR        445,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1200 0400 CONDO 1973   1454     439000 
50434322180001210 CAULFIELD ROBERT A & CAULFIELD JAMES F       270,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     270000 
50434322180001220 SACHS ROSE        362,391.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     434000 
50434322180002010 MATHESON MONIQUE        44,041.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180002020 TERRY BARBARA A        239,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180002030 STRASSER SCOTT TRUST STRASSER SCOTT TRUSTEE       239,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180002040 FURLAUD RICHARD M TRUST        340,160.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     334000 
50434322180002050 FEUERSTEIN SIDNEY & CHARLOTTE        417,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     411000 
50434322180002060 KAPLAN ARTHUR & SHAW HELEN       364,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     364000 
50434322180002070 FALASCO VINCENT A TR TOMMY J FALASCO C/O       369,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     364000 
50434322180002080 SOSINSKY ROMAN & SOSINSKY BERTA       369,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2080 0400 CONDO 1973    903     364000 
50434322180002110 DONAHUE J BARRY        620,925.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2110 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     597000 
50434322180002120 ROSENTHAL SHIRLEY AUDREY GOODMAN ET AL TITL HLDR       496,886.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2120 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     597000 
50434322180002130 SHEA LEIDA & ALLIK MAIRE       547,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     597000 
50434322180002140 ENGELBERG ALFRED        956,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2140 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     956000 
50434322180002150 MIRO HERMA D        233,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2150 0400 CONDO 1973    580     233000 
50434322180002160 MIRO HERMA D        177,917.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2160 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     643000 
50434322180002170 ZUSSMAN DAVID T & ZUSSMAN RANDI G       962,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2170 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     956000 
50434322180002180 KOTAH LLC 1031 EXCHANGE EXPERTS LLC       367,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2180 0400 CONDO 1973   1210     361000 
50434322180002190 DONAHUE BARRY J        450,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2190 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     444000 
50434322180002200 NOLL HARRIETTE        353,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2200 0400 CONDO 1973   1039     347000 
50434322180002210 HEMLEY MARCIA W        450,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     444000 
50434322180002220 LEGRAND JEAN-YVES        227,771.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     444000 
50434322180003010 RYNNE DONALD G        244,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     239000 
50434322180003020 ORAV HELLE R HELLE R ORAV TR TITL HLDR       244,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     239000 
50434322180003030 WEISS IRIS M WEISS ANDREW G TR       160,699.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     239000 
50434322180003040 FARIS CLAUDIA        339,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     339000 
50434322180003050 MCLEAN MILDRED B RAUCH FOUNDATION INC       366,923.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     416000 
50434322180003060 SHERMAN BERNARD & ARLENE SHERMAN       369,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     369000 
50434322180003070 BRUNS PEYTON E        36,299.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     369000 
50434322180003080 JEHLE PATRICIA        485,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3080 0400 CONDO 1973   1497     480000 
50434322180003100 PLOTT SUZANNE        109,418.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3100 0400 CONDO 1973    540     162000 
50434322180003110 KALB RICHARD L &        628,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3110 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     622000 
50434322180003120 COURTNEY NORMA H        280,691.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3120 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     622000 
50434322180003130 STEINBERG ANNE        154,701.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     622000 
50434322180003140 CHASE JUDITH B        251,602.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3140 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     981000 
50434322180003150 FINKLE JOEL & MARIA        248,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3150 0400 CONDO 1973    580     248000 
50434322180003160 FINKLE JOEL & MARIA        674,160.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3160 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     668000 
50434322180003170 HIGHT NELL W WACHOVIA BANK NA TR       937,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3170 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     981000 
50434322180003180 WOLFINGTON JOHN A TRUST WOLFINGTON JOHN A TR       377,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3180 0400 CONDO 1973   1210     371000 
50434322180003190 RESNICK JUDITH        460,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3190 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     454000 
50434322180003200 KNAPP JEFF        362,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3200 0400 CONDO 1973   1039     357000 
50434322180003210 HOLBERG EILEEN TRUST HOLBERG EILEEN TR       103,366.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     454000 
50434322180003220 WAXMAN JACK & DUBIN BERNARD J       366,367.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     454000 
50434322180004010 WEISS SUSAN &        542,220.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4010 0400 CONDO 1973   1786     587000 
50434322180004030 SELTZER ANITA L        26,892.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     306000 
50434322180004040 YONKOVIG ZEN & BARBARA P BARBARA P YONKOVIG       49,433.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     357000 
50434322180004050 GOLDMAN JACQUELINE L        458,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     509000 
50434322180004060 FRANKEL RICHARD        374,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     374000 
50434322180004070 REILLY ADELE        379,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     374000 
50434322180004080 KARDARAS EVANGELIA KARDARAS EVANGELIA TR       46,498.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4080 0400 CONDO 1973    903     374000 
50434322180004090 MANOLIS J STEVEN & MANOLIS MICHELLE K       159,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4090 0400 CONDO 1973    579     159000 
50434322180004100 SPIEGEL ROBERT &        420,480.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4100 0400 CONDO 1973   1753     963000 
50434322180004120 MAY ALAN & MAY ELIZABETH       653,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4120 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     647000 
50434322180004130 ALFUS MARJORIE MEYER SYDELLE F TR       653,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     647000 
50434322180004140 GOLD BERNICE G        523,052.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4140 0400 CONDO 1973   2414    1248000 
50434322180004160 APFEL CARL & APFEL IRIS B       1,703,512.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4160 0400 CONDO 1973   2676    2054000 
50434322180004170 GOLDSMITH HENRY GOLDSMITH JANET F TRUST       252,581.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4170 0400 CONDO 1973   1919     676000 
50434322180004200 ZIV SEYMORE L        373,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4200 0400 CONDO 1973   1039     367000 
50434322180004210 ZIV SEYMORE L        271,431.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     470000 
50434322180004220 LUBOTTA FLORENCE TR EST        476,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     470000 
50434322180005010 SCHWARTZMAN MICHAEL & SCHWARTZMAN LISA K       316,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     316000 
50434322180005020 GOLDBERG MARC S & GAIL E        321,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     316000 
50434322180005030 MILLNER DOROTHY W        47,476.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     316000 
50434322180005040 BOLOG SHARON        322,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     367000 
50434322180005050 MALAGA-STRACHAN SURA        525,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     519000 
50434322180005060 ARYEH MAHIN        384,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     379000 
50434322180005070 GREENSPAN CORINNE        384,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     379000 
50434322180005080 CLARK IRMA        37,876.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5080 0400 CONDO 1973    903     379000 
50434322180005090 CLARK IRMA        164,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5090 0400 CONDO 1973    579     164000 
50434322180005100 TAMARKIN BERTRAM        845,283.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5100 0400 CONDO 1973   1753     988000 
50434322180005120 CINER ALAN G        342,441.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5120 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     672000 
50434322180005130 PERRY RICHARD & PERRY LISA       678,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     672000 
50434322180005140 PERRY RICHARD        1,633,480.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5140 0400 CONDO 1973   2503    1626000 
50434322180005200 PERRY RICHARD        389,425.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5200 0400 CONDO 1973    992     373000 
50434322180005210 SILVERBLATT JOAN M        436,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     480000 
50434322180005220 GREENSPAN CORRINE        267,517.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     480000 
50434322180006010 LEE HERBERT C & LEE MILDRED S       1,808,120.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6010 0400 CONDO 1973   2068    1883000 
50434322180006030 RAFFETTO RICHARD &        330,320.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     326000 
50434322180006040 RIGLER MIRIAM &        38,317.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     377000 
50434322180006050 SCHWARTZMAN MICHAEL &        535,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     529000 
50434322180006060 DANIELS MYRNA        389,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     384000 
50434322180006070 GARDINER EUNICE        389,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     384000 
50434322180006080 MORAN MIRIAM K TR        389,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6080 0400 CONDO 1973    903     384000 
50434322180006090 MORAN MIRIAM K TR        169,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6090 0400 CONDO 1973    579     169000 
50434322180006100 GAY JOHN JR        192,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6100 0400 CONDO 1973    540     192000 
50434322180006110 GREENBERG HUGH & BEVERLY        697,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6110 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     697000 
50434322180006120 SCHAPIRO JOAN        799,690.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6120 0400 CONDO 1973   2583     938000 
50434322180006220 WEISMAN EDWARD EDWARD WEISMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       446,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     490000 
50434322180010010 ROSENSHEIN ARNOLD        852,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0010 0400 CONDO 1973   1699     846000 
50434322180010020 FORBES ROBERT & FORBES LYDIA       1,166,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0020 0400 CONDO 1973   2120    1160000 
50434322180010170 SMITH SUZETTE        623,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0170 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     618000 
50434322180010180 SMITH SUZETTE        623,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0180 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     618000 
50434322180010190 BEYER WARREN G & BEYER JEANETTE E       442,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0190 0400 CONDO 1973    905     442000 
50434322180010200 ROTMAN MARVIN & ROTMAN MARSHA V       842,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0200 0400 CONDO 1973   1860     836000 
50434322180010210 HOFFPAUER PAMELA        191,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0210 0400 CONDO 1973    800     188000 
50434322180010220 ZENTNER GARY        299,992.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0220 0400 CONDO 1973   1745     448000 
50434322180010230 WOOD RENEE M        338,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0230 0400 CONDO 1973    992     333000 
50434322180010240 GATES LETITIA A        107,523.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0240 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     434000 
50434322180011010 WOLFINGTON JOHN & WOLFINGTON SARAH       234,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     229000 
50434322180011020 RAU JOHN C & HANDLER JOANNE       170,652.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     229000 
50434322180011030 RUMBOUGH STANLEY M JR TRUST HANDELMAN DONALD E TR       234,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     229000 
50434322180011040 GAY MARION D & GAY JOHN JR       195,758.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     329000 
50434322180011050 VAGO JOHN        406,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     406000 
50434322180011060 HASTINGS DORIS L        359,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     359000 
50434322180011070 HOFFMAN DONALD        364,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     359000 
50434322180011080 HOFFMAN DONALD        206,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1080 0400 CONDO 1973    918     206000 
50434322180011110 MATHESON M ONIQUE        578,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1110 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     572000 
50434322180011120 GREENBERG VICKI J        578,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1120 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     572000 
50434322180011130 LOWENTHAL STEVEN J &        578,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     572000 
50434322180011140 ZIFF ALICE ZIFF ALICE TR       83,764.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1140 0400 CONDO 1973    913     401000 
50434322180011150 SCHLOSS SUE W        591,216.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1150 0400 CONDO 1973   2026    1526000 
50434322180011170 KARP RICHARD M & JANE E KARP TR TITL HLDR       471,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1170 0400 CONDO 1973   2441    1253000 
50434322180011190 FUCHS R JOSEPH        574,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1190 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     618000 
50434322180011200 MAKER GEORGE W        937,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1200 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     931000 
50434322180011210 MAKER GEORGE W TR        488,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     488000 
50434322180011220 MAZZARELLA ANTHONY R        440,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     434000 
50434322180011230 TJEKNAVORIAN JULIA M        112,060.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1230 0400 CONDO 1973    992     333000 
50434322180011240 REYMOND SUSAN G REYMOND SUSAN G TR       216,070.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1240 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     434000 
50434322180011250 MANDEL RUBE & SHIRLEY        234,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1250 0400 CONDO 1973    893     229000 
50434322180011260 RISIN SEMYON A & RISIN DIANA       284,574.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1260 0400 CONDO 1973    992     333000 
50434322180011270 GIULIANI RUDOLPH W & GIULIANI JUDITH S       434,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1270 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     434000 
50434322180011280 MATHESON WILLIAM Y        434,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1280 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     434000 
50434322180012010 LEICHTER PARTNERS LP        253,575.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180012020 LEIBOWITT DAVID TRUST LEICHTER ANTHONY P  TR       239,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180012030 BLOOM JACQUELINE A        234,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180012040 LEVY JANET        346,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     341000 
50434322180012050 ROCK PETER P & ROCK SHERYL A       362,144.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     411000 
50434322180012060 HATZ FLORENCE L HATZ FLORENCE L TR       34,759.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     364000 
50434322180012070 OBRIEN ERIN        149,586.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2070 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180012080 BELL ARON & BELL HENRYKA       112,407.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2080 0400 CONDO 1973    893     234000 
50434322180012110 SCHWEBEL M MAC & IRENE M        796,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2110 0400 CONDO 1973   1703     796000 
50434322180012120 SCHWEBEL MORRIS M        24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2120 0400 CONDO 1973    780     220000 
50434322180012130 STRASSER PETER R & STRASSER JANE       603,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     597000 
50434322180012140 VISCONTI GRAYCE R        108,765.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2140 0400 CONDO 1973    913     416000 
50434322180012150 KRAMER NORMAN M        259,770.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2150 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     956000 
50434322180012160 TUCKER ROBERT S        233,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2160 0400 CONDO 1973    580     233000 
50434322180012170 SHELDON ROBERT & SHELDON EDWARD       649,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2170 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     643000 
50434322180012180 ROSS MOLLY S        649,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2180 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     643000 
50434322180012190 JACOBS LUCILLE M JACOBS LUCILLE M TR       306,027.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2190 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     643000 
50434322180012200 LEVIANT JACQUES        962,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2200 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     956000 
50434322180012210 SHIENTAG FLORENCE P        526,925.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     503000 
50434322180012220 SHAW ELEANOR M        355,310.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     444000 
50434322180012230 ROSENBERG ESTHER        349,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2230 0400 CONDO 1973    992     343000 
50434322180012240 SOLOMONSON STEVEN        450,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2240 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     444000 
50434322180012250 HAMILTON GLORIA S        328,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2250 0400 CONDO 1973    953     379000 
50434322180012260 LEWIS JOAN M        349,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2260 0400 CONDO 1973    992     343000 
50434322180012270 GLEKEL NEWTON        512,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2270 0400 CONDO 1973   1749     506000 
50434322180012280 JANSSEN JANE H        158,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2280 0400 CONDO 1973    738     158000 
50434322180013010 HIRSCH LINDA        143,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     239000 
50434322180013020 SCHOTTENSTEIN LENORE G TRUST SCHOTTENSTEIN LENORE G TRUSTEE       388,575.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3020 0400 CONDO 1973    903     369000 
50434322180013030 SCHENKER ERNESTYNA        369,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3030 0400 CONDO 1973    903     369000 
50434322180013040 TRAPANI JOSEPH        92,514.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     339000 
50434322180013050 SONDOCK CLIFFORD & DEBRA P PARNET C/O       422,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     416000 
50434322180013060 MOSS ROBERT        374,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     369000 
50434322180013070 MORMINO MARGARET P        45,519.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3070 0400 CONDO 1973    893     239000 
50434322180013080 LADMER BETTY B LADMER BETTY B TRUST       51,403.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3080 0400 CONDO 1973    893     239000 
50434322180013090 OBRIEN ERIN        154,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3090 0400 CONDO 1973    579     154000 
50434322180013100 MEYER SYDELLE        162,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3100 0400 CONDO 1973    540     162000 
50434322180013110 MEYER SYDELLE        283,759.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3110 0400 CONDO 1973   1703     821000 
50434322180013120 MEYER SYDELLE        235,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3120 0400 CONDO 1973    780     235000 
50434322180013130 GERSTL GEORGIE GERSTL GEORGIE TR       154,701.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     622000 
50434322180013140 FRANK ALAN        431,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3140 0400 CONDO 1973    913     431000 
50434322180013150 HARRIS PAULA B J & PAULA HARRIS TR HLDRS       662,310.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3150 0400 CONDO 1973   2026    1576000 
50434322180013170 BROWN DAVID M        674,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3170 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     668000 
50434322180013180 CAULFIELD JAMES JR &        668,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3180 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     668000 
50434322180013190 FABRIKANT ELAINE        674,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3190 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     668000 
50434322180013200 MAGOWAN MARK & MAGOWAN NINA       835,676.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3200 0400 CONDO 1973   1501     981000 
50434322180013210 BROWN BENJAMIN        524,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     518000 
50434322180013220 CARMICHAEL HEATHER ROSEHILL INC C/O       460,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     454000 
50434322180013230 FRIED HARRIS        193,996.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3230 0400 CONDO 1973    992     353000 
50434322180013240 HARRIS B J TR & HARRIS PAULA TR       454,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3240 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     454000 
50434322180013250 GABRI HASSAN EL        394,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3250 0400 CONDO 1973    953     389000 
50434322180013260 KAISER A LAURANCE IV        359,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3260 0400 CONDO 1973    992     353000 
50434322180013270 ALPERT REBA        454,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3270 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     454000 
50434322180013280 GOLDSMITH CHRISTINA D        477,925.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 3280 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     454000 
50434322180014010 MILSTEIN ARNOLD & NANCY E ADLER H/W       308,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     306000 
50434322180014020 KRAMER PETER & KRAMER GERRY       306,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     306000 
50434322180014030 LUBITZ LEWIS        325,575.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     306000 
50434322180014040 REISMAN STEVEN A        357,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     357000 
50434322180014050 STALL SONYA        412,068.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     509000 
50434322180014060 GALLAGHER FRANCIS T & FRANCIS T & ROSALIE L GALLAGHER TR HLDRS       72,329.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     374000 
50434322180014070 LORIA WALTER J & RUTH O        249,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4070 0400 CONDO 1973    893     244000 
50434322180014080 JODZIO EDWARD & JODZIO MARIA       244,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4080 0400 CONDO 1973    893     244000 
50434322180014090 JODZIO EDWARD & JODZIO MARIA       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4090 0400 CONDO 1973    579     159000 
50434322180014100 JEHLE PATRICIA & REIDY JAMES       172,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4100 0400 CONDO 1973    540     172000 
50434322180014110 REIDY JAMES &        647,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4110 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     647000 
50434322180014120 KOWAL LESLIE S        647,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4120 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     647000 
50434322180014130 LIPSCHER ELEANOR        153,233.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4130 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     647000 
50434322180014140 MANOLIS J STEVEN MANOLIS MICHELLE K       474,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4140 0400 CONDO 1973    913     446000 
50434322180014150 FELDMAN LESLIE C        1,013,480.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4150 0400 CONDO 1973   1501    1006000 
50434322180014160 FRANK SHARON A        263,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4160 0400 CONDO 1973    580     263000 
50434322180014170 HELLER SYLVIA K HELLER SYLVIA K TR       180,142.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4170 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     693000 
50434322180014180 WOLFE ANN R ANN R WOLFE TR HLDR       180,642.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4180 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     693000 
50434322180014190 DENERSTEIN RITA H        649,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4190 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     693000 
50434322180014200 SIMMONS ROBERT K & SIMMONS DEBORAH W       1,012,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4200 0400 CONDO 1984   1501    1006000 
50434322180014210 HAMMER GAEL        489,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     533000 
50434322180014220 ROTCHFORD MICHAEL M &        92,690.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     470000 
50434322180014230 ECKSTEIN NADINE        369,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4230 0400 CONDO 1973    992     363000 
50434322180014240 PERLMAN KENNETH W & PERLMAN FELICE J       476,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4240 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     470000 
50434322180014250 SCHWARTZ HELENE TRUST        134,003.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4250 0400 CONDO 1973    953     399000 
50434322180014260 MANOLIS J STEVEN & MANOLIS MICHELLE K       369,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4260 0400 CONDO 1973    992     363000 
50434322180014270 DESSAUER REVA H TR        426,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4270 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     470000 
50434322180014280 DELAVALDENE GUY W        470,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 4280 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     470000 
50434322180015010 GRALLA MILDRED C L TRUST        321,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     316000 
50434322180015020 PRAGER WILLIAM W JR        335,575.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     316000 
50434322180015030 ABRAHAM S DANIEL        321,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5030 0400 CONDO 1973    893     316000 
50434322180015040 ABRAHAM S DANIEL        367,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     367000 
50434322180015050 WILSON STEVEN        525,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     519000 
50434322180015060 HASSENFELD RITA D TRUST        384,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     379000 
50434322180015070 FLATTO GAIL S        767,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5070 0400 CONDO 1973   1811     762000 
50434322180015090 S GODFREY CO LIMITED TR        164,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5090 0400 CONDO 1973    579     164000 
50434322180015100 CHASANOFF CLAIRE TR        182,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5100 0400 CONDO 1973    540     182000 
50434322180015110 CHASANOFF CLAIRE TR        678,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5110 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     672000 
50434322180015120 JEHLE PATRICIA & JEHLE ROSEMARY       678,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5120 0400 CONDO 1984   1215     672000 
50434322180015130 MARINO LINDA        562,632.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5130 0400 CONDO 1984   1215     672000 
50434322180015140 MARINO LINDA        461,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5140 0400 CONDO 1984    913     461000 
50434322180015150 SYLVAN ROSA TRUST VRONA EDWARD V JR TR       429,885.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5150 0400 CONDO 1984   2026    1626000 
50434322180015170 ABRAHAM S DANIEL        741,925.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5170 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     718000 
50434322180015180 ABRAHAM S DANIEL        718,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5180 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     718000 
50434322180015190 WEST JAN WEST JAN TR       294,716.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5190 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     718000 
50434322180015200 MAZZA OLIVERA        718,133.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5200 0400 CONDO 1984   1501    1031000 
50434322180015210 GEISLER CLAIRE-LOUISE        554,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5210 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     548000 
50434322180015220 PRESSMAN HOLLY        436,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5220 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     480000 
50434322180015230 POST BERNARD G & LIPMAN JANE       379,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5230 0400 CONDO 1973    992     373000 
50434322180015240 ARLUCK DORIS        89,905.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5240 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     480000 
50434322180015250 ERICSSON RUTH L KNAUST CHRISTIAN G       364,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5250 0400 CONDO 1973    953     409000 
50434322180015260 ZINOVOY CLARA ZINOVOY CLARA TR       329,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5260 0400 CONDO 1973    992     373000 
50434322180015270 LAMBERG PEARL        486,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5270 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     480000 
50434322180015280 LERMAN CAPPY ABRAHAM ABRAHAM CAPPY TR       435,880.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 5280 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     480000 
50434322180016010 SFERRA ANDREW S SFERRA ANDREW S LIVING TRUST       161,396.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6010 0400 CONDO 1973    893     326000 
50434322180016020 LUBITZ LEWIS        183,738.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6020 0400 CONDO 1973    893     326000 
50434322180016040 TOPOL ROBERT & TROTTA MICHAEL A       382,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6040 0400 CONDO 1973    903     377000 
50434322180016050 ABRAHAM S DANIEL        535,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6050 0400 CONDO 1973   1196     529000 
50434322180016060 MUELLER PATRICE & MUELLER SARA S       384,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6060 0400 CONDO 1973    903     384000 
50434322180016070 FLAK CHARLOTTE TRUST        389,340.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6070 0400 CONDO 1973    903     384000 
50434322180016080 FALK CHARLOTTE        151,524.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6080 0400 CONDO 1973   1497     495000 
50434322180016100 HASTINGS DORIS L        192,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6100 0400 CONDO 1973    540     192000 
50434322180016110 SCHLEIFER JACK P        703,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6110 0400 CONDO 1973   1215     697000 
50434322180016120 HASTINGS DORIS L        157,637.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6120 0400 CONDO 1984   1215     697000 
50434322180016130 BERDON LAURA M        703,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6130 0400 CONDO 1984   1215     697000 
50434322180016140 HEYMAN ANNETTE HEYMAN ANNETTE TR       77,460.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6140 0400 CONDO 1984    913     476000 
50434322180016150 SALZBERG HELEN M        1,658,480.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6150 0400 CONDO 1984   2026    1651000 
50434322180016250 WARSHAW MONA        71,895.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6250 0400 CONDO 1973    953     419000 
50434322180016260 HUBSMITH PATRICIA        33,062.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6260 0400 CONDO 1973    992     383000 
50434322180016270 LAND TRUST NO 101MD DANIELS MYRNA TR       490,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6270 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     490000 
50434322180016280 LAND TRUST NO 101MD DANIELS MYRNA TR       496,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 6280 0400 CONDO 1973   1226     490000 
50434322180030010 FINKLE JOEL & MARIA        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0010 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030020 GOLDMAN JACQUELINE        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0020 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030030 SALZBERG HELEN M        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0030 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030040 LAND TRUST NO 101MD DANIELS MYRNA TR       34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0040 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030050 ROSENSHEIN ARNOLD        32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0050 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030060 LOWENTHAL STEVEN J &        32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0060 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030070 WOLFINGTON JOHN & WOLFINGTON SARAH       32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0070 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030080 REIDY JAMES &        32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0080 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030090 SCHLOSS SUE W TRUST PERRY DONSLD P ET AL TRS       32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0090 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030100 DENERSTEIN RITA H        32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0100 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030110 BELL ARON        32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0110 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030120 MORAN MIRIAM K TRUST        32,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0120 0400 CONDO 1973      0      32000 
50434322180030130 HARRIS B J TR & HARRIS PAULA TR       34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0130 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030140 GORDON BENJAMIN &        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0140 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030150 SCHWEBEL M M & IRENE M        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0150 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030160 NOLL S DARWIN TRUST & SCOTT HAZEL       34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0160 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030170 MARINO LINDA        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0170 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030180 GODFREY S COMPANY LTD        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0180 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030190 ROSENBLOOM BERNIS        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0190 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030200 SHELDON BERNICE T TR        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0200 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030210 WEISMAN MARILYN TR & WEISMAN EDWARD TR       34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0210 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030220 SCHWARTZ HELENE PALM BEACH TOWERS       34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0220 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030230 PERLMAN KENNETH W & PERLMAN FELICE J       34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0230 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030240 SIMMONS ROBERT K & SIMMONS DEBORAH W       34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0240 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030250 BROWN BENJAMIN        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0250 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030260 FABRIKANT ELAINE        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0260 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030270 GLEKEL NEWTON        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0270 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030280 MIRO HERMA D        34,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0280 0400 CONDO 1973      0      34000 
50434322180030290 SCHAPIRO STUART M        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0290 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030300 TAMARKIN BERTRAM        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0300 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030310 ABRAHAM S DANIEL        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0310 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030320 LUBITZ LEWIS        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0320 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030340 ABRAHAM CAPPY L        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0340 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030350 KARP JANE E 2007 FL QUAL PER RES TRUST        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0350 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030360 HASSENFELD RITA D TRUST        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0360 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030370 KAISER A LAURANCE IV        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0370 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030380 FEUERSTEIN S & CHARLOTTE        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0380 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030390 MANOLIS J STEVEN & MANOLIS MICHELLE K       33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0390 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030400 HELLER SYLVIA K TR        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0400 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030410 PERRY RICHARD        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0410 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180030420 CLARK IRMA        33,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0420 0400 CONDO 1973      0      33000 
50434322180041010 MATHESON MONIQUE        143,751.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1010 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180041020 REGENT BANK        181,576.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 1020 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052010 TOWN OF PALM BEACH UNITED WAY INC        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2010 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052020 HARRIS B J TR & HARRIS PAULA TR       142,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2020 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052030 TOWN OF PALM BEACH UNITED WAY INC        0.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2030 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052040 HARRIS B J TR & HARRIS PAULA TR       61,276.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2040 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052050 HARRIS B J TR & HARRIS PAULA TR       69,961.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2050 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052070 KUVIN S F & GABRIELLE T        174,376.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2070 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052080 JOSEPHS MITCHELL A & AILEEN        176,401.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2080 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052090 MALLAMO S M & MARY E        120,311.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2090 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180052100 KUVIN SANFORD F & GABRIELLE T        131,751.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 2100 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060010 LESTER HOWARD &        176,671.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060020 LESTER HOWARD & LESTER PATRICIA       112,681.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060040 MANUEL ANITA E        180,951.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0040 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060050 MANUEL ANITA E        265,376.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0050 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060060 ANITA E MANUEL REVOCABLE TRUST        108,651.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0060 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060070 PERRY RICHARD        32,491.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0070 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060080 ERIN STUART INC        227,551.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0080 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060090 MATHESON MONIQUE D        194,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0090 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060100 BALZEKAS STANLEY JR        189,901.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0100 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060110 MATHESON MONIQUE        141,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0110 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060120 BALZEKAS STANLEY JR        156,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0120 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060130 MATHESON MONIQUE D        31,921.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0130 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060140 PUBILLONES JOSEPH        135,751.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0140 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060150 TRUSKOWSKI ROBERT E & GALLEN MAUREEN       93,016.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0150 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060160 BAGLEY VICKI CELEBRITY SERVICE INTL C/O       129,251.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0160 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322180060170 SLATER ROBERT W        82,416.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432218 PALM BEACH TOWERS CONDO *** 0170 0460 CONDO COMM 1973      0          1 
50434322190000010 PELOSO ALBERT EST BARBARA MCGLYNN C/O       192,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1973    585     192150 
50434322190000020 PELOSO ALBERT EST BARBARA MCGLYNN C/O       155,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1973    473     155400 
50434322190000030 LAZAREWICZ STEPHANIE        92,140.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1973    467     152250 
50434322190000040 PELOSO ALBERT EST BARBARA MCGLYNN C/O       148,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1973    450     148050 
50434322190000050 PELOSO SCOTCH G        59,764.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1973    576     189000 
50434322190000060 CALDWELL JOAN        85,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1973    229      85050 
50434322190000070 BROWN DARLENE E        88,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1973    239      88200 
50434322190000080 PELOSO SCOTCH        108,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1973    293     108150 
50434322190000090 PELOSO ALBERT EST BARBARA A. MCGLYNN C/O       85,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1973    229      85050 
50434322190000100 MCGLYNN BARBARA A & PELOSO SCOTCH G       70,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1973    192      70350 
50434322190000110 PAYNE GEORGE J        71,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1973    194      71400 
50434322190000120 PELOSO SCOTCH G        70,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432219 SUNSET APTS CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1973    192      70350 
50434322220000010 FALCONE EDWARD        14,608,205.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1992 03 08 01 1    1971340       9095      10078       8032                 
50434322220000020 METZGER ANNE G        2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322220000030 GROPPER EDWARD & GROPPER HOPE       2,836,475.00 0.7824 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1980 04 03 01 1    1083030       4771       4945       4407                 
50434322220000050 POURNARAS THOMAS G        2,558,574.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 04 03 01 1     302376       3741       4216       3173                 
50434322220000060 FOUR 01 ANTIGUA LTD        3,570,930.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1980 04 03 01 2    1260770       4409       4567       4039                 
50434322230000010 BAKER HOLLIS M TR        3,781,564.00 0.37 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 04 05 00 1    1619085       5743       5964       5388                 
50434322230000022 DOWNEY ANN T        3,249,266.00 0.35 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 04 04 01 2    1130235       4884       5050       4498                 
50434322230000031 FLAHERTY W E & CLEMENTINA S        86,250.00 0.03 VACANT                           
50434322230000040 FLAHERTY W E & FLAHERTY CLEMENTINA S       7,745,251.00 0.82 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1989 04 06 01 1    1451885       6099       6438       5596                 
50434322230000040 FLAHERTY W E & FLAHERTY CLEMENTINA S       7,745,251.00 0.82 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 04 00 1     236798       2154       2420       2040                 
50434322230000051 PANNILL ALICE Z        4,141,969.00 0.95 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1965 05 06 00 2     901440       7010       8102       5689                 
50434322230000061 ARNOLD JAMES Y JR & ROBERTA B        575,000.00 0.11 VACANT                           
50434322230000062 PUCILLO MICHEAL J TR        2,502,500.00 0.34 VACANT                           
50434322230000070 ARNOLD JAMES Y JR & ROBERTA B ARNOLD ROBERTA B       904,291.00 0.52 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1929 03 01 00 2       3137       1220       1505        806                 
50434322230000070 ARNOLD JAMES Y JR & ROBERTA B ARNOLD ROBERTA B       904,291.00 0.52 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1929 03 03 00 2       5993       2658       2852       2578                 
50434322230000070 ARNOLD JAMES Y JR & ROBERTA B ARNOLD ROBERTA B       904,291.00 0.52 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 00 00 00 1       2027        414        414        414                 
50434322230000081 ARNOLD JAMES Y JR ET AL TRS        575,000.00 0.07 VACANT                           
50434322230000082 SMITH LESLY SMITH LESLY TR       2,384,201.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 04 05 01 1.5    1492864       6692       7813       5739                 
50434322240020000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        42,042,154.00 4 MULTIFAMILY           1976 1995 0021 01 3 FIRE PROOF    5558800      47877         
50434322240020000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        42,042,154.00 4 MULTIFAMILY           1976 1995 0021 01 3 FIRE PROOF    5579640      47877         
50434322240020000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        42,042,154.00 4 MULTIFAMILY           1976 1995 0022 01 3 FIRE PROOF    5552630      47666         
50434322240020000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        42,042,154.00 4 MULTIFAMILY           1976 1995 0022 01 3 FIRE PROOF    9800740      72474         
50434322240030000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        0.00 1.48 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434322240040000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        161,319,000.00 9.64 MOTEL           1926 1995 0572 01 3 FIRE PROOF  109400370     658312         
50434322240040000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        161,319,000.00 9.64 MOTEL           1998 1998 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    3847490      19366         
50434322240040000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        161,319,000.00 9.64 MOTEL           1998 1998 0010 01 2 FIRE RESIS     431220       6220         
50434322240050000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        1,000.00 1.25 MOTEL                           
50434322240060000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        12,000,000.00 2.43 MOTEL           2006 2006 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      97800       3304         
50434322240060000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        12,000,000.00 2.43 MOTEL           2006 2006 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     153930       1584         
50434322240060000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        12,000,000.00 2.43 MOTEL           2006 2006 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     371230       1965         
50434322240060000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        12,000,000.00 2.43 MOTEL           2006 2006 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1113860       7479         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1917 00 05 00 3     148190       6479       8129       5858 1958 1958 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE     146620       5000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1917 00 05 00 3     148190       6479       8129       5858 1968 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1775260      16918         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1917 00 05 00 3     148190       6479       8129       5858 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      56520       2000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1917 00 05 00 3     148190       6479       8129       5858 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      60350       2000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1917 00 05 00 3     148190       6479       8129       5858 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      74150       2500         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1917 00 05 00 3     148190       6479       8129       5858 1987 1987 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      78690       2480         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1917 00 05 00 3     148190       6479       8129       5858 1997 1997 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      29850        306         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1922 00 05 00 3     181904       7558       9270       6916 1958 1958 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE     146620       5000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1922 00 05 00 3     181904       7558       9270       6916 1968 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1775260      16918         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1922 00 05 00 3     181904       7558       9270       6916 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      56520       2000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1922 00 05 00 3     181904       7558       9270       6916 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      60350       2000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1922 00 05 00 3     181904       7558       9270       6916 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      74150       2500         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1922 00 05 00 3     181904       7558       9270       6916 1987 1987 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      78690       2480         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1922 00 05 00 3     181904       7558       9270       6916 1997 1997 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      29850        306         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1992 00 05 00 3     732861       8310      10957       7371 1958 1958 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE     146620       5000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1992 00 05 00 3     732861       8310      10957       7371 1968 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1775260      16918         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1992 00 05 00 3     732861       8310      10957       7371 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      56520       2000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1992 00 05 00 3     732861       8310      10957       7371 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      60350       2000         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1992 00 05 00 3     732861       8310      10957       7371 1974 1974 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      74150       2500         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1992 00 05 00 3     732861       8310      10957       7371 1987 1987 0000 01 4 PRE-ENGINE      78690       2480         
50434322240070000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,300,000.00 86.05 GOLF COURSE 1900 1992 00 05 00 3     732861       8310      10957       7371 1997 1997 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      29850        306         
50434322240090000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        0.00 5.43 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434322240100000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        11,880,000.00 5.26 MOTEL                           
50434322240120000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        5,256,000.00 2.92 VACANT                           
50434322240130000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        6,048,000.00 3.36 VACANT                           
50434322240140000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        4,000,000.00 3.64 GOLF COURSE           2004 2004 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      58580        671         
50434322240160000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        5,300,000.00 0.54 GOLF COURSE           2001 2001 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4568580      24722         
50434322240200000 BREAKERS PALM BEACH INC        4,200,000.00 2.6 OFF MULTISTORY           1900 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     452870       8016         
50434322260001010 PRICE AILENE W        141,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260001020 DONNELLEY RICHARD R III & DONNELLEY ROBIN W       275,218.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260002010 HORNER ROBERT R JR        519,590.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322260002020 KAUFMANN ELLEN F        551,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432226 THREE ELEVEN COCOANUT ROW CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1986   1666     601650 
50434322270000010 MERRIMAN JOE J & ELAINE A        8,619,930.00 0.84 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 04 04 01 1     575661       5813       6086       5289                 
50434322270000020 GUILD RALPH & CALLA GUILD CALLA       3,037,247.00 0.79 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 05 05 01 2    1111180       8694       9473       7910                 
50434322270000030 ROBBINS EDWIN & ROBBINS BEVERLY       2,700,642.00 0.59 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 03 01 1    1548623       6183       6647       5657                 
50434322270000040 ELSON EDWARD E & ELSON SUZANNE G       3,336,131.00 0.57 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 04 04 01 1    1094951       6030       7165       4912                 
50434322290000010 ABRAHAMSEN SONJA        345,520.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432229 PHIPPS HOUSE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    660     403200 
50434322290000020 FLYNN CLARENCE M & ROBERT A SHELTON       454,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432229 PHIPPS HOUSE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    748     454650 
50434322290000030 JAEGER CAROLYN J        524,786.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432229 PHIPPS HOUSE CONDO 3 0400 CONDO 1989   1041     581700 
50434322290000050 FERGUSON JANE S        487,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432229 PHIPPS HOUSE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    907     548100 
50434322310000010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 1.54 MUNICIPAL                           
50434322310000030 ROYAL POINCIANA SOUTH        17,437,349.00 0 MULTIFAMILY           1966 1990 0086 01 3 FIRE PROOF    9647880     140708         
50434322310000301 NEW BRADLEY HOUSE LTD LEVIN C/O       4,100,787.00 0 MOTEL           1923 1955 0031 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1299180      28668         
50434322310000380 ISLAND ANIMAL HOS INC        1,043,290.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1921 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     117860        920         
50434322310000380 ISLAND ANIMAL HOS INC        1,043,290.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1921 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     277430       2668         
50434322310000400 RITCON PROPERTIES LLC FRANK CONIGLIO C/O       2,571,070.00 0.3627 STORES           1952 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     365440       4371         
50434322310000440 BONER CLIVE & NEIL BONER       1,074,473.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1987 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     425800       3413         
50434322310000480 FIDELITY FED SAV BANK OF FLA C/O NATIONAL CITY 16-0055       648,000.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434322310000500 FIDELITY FEDERAL SAV & LOAN ASSN C/O NATIONAL CITY 16-0055       653,389.00 0.124 FINANCIAL                           
50434322310000520 TESTA FAMILY LLC        1,631,863.00 0 STORES                           
50434322310000580 TESTA FAMILY LLC        775,878.00 0 STORES           1946 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     127100       2658         
50434322310000600 TESTA FAMILY LLC        684,419.00 0 STORES           1931 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     204790       2751         
50434322310000611 TESTA FAMILY LLC        866,250.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     386730       5360         
50434322310000630 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP BRENNER REAL ESTATE GROUP INC C/O       2,858,039.00 0.2897 STORES           1923 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     258670       3245         
50434322310000630 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP BRENNER REAL ESTATE GROUP INC C/O       2,858,039.00 0.2897 STORES           1923 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     279380       3743         
50434322310000630 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP BRENNER REAL ESTATE GROUP INC C/O       2,858,039.00 0.2897 STORES           1940 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     119390       1040         
50434322310000630 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP BRENNER REAL ESTATE GROUP INC C/O       2,858,039.00 0.2897 STORES           1957 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     178180       1919         
50434322310000652 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP RITCON INVESTMENT EAST C/O       3,527,420.00 0.3326 STORE/OFF/RES           1923 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     104100       1652         
50434322310000652 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP RITCON INVESTMENT EAST C/O       3,527,420.00 0.3326 STORE/OFF/RES           1923 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     355190       5722         
50434322310000652 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP RITCON INVESTMENT EAST C/O       3,527,420.00 0.3326 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     568890       6802         
50434322310000652 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP RITCON INVESTMENT EAST C/O       3,527,420.00 0.3326 STORE/OFF/RES           1940 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      83850        969         
50434322310000652 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP RITCON INVESTMENT EAST C/O       3,527,420.00 0.3326 STORE/OFF/RES           1940 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      96990       1159         
50434322310000760 SHAVELL WADE GUY RABIDEAU ESQ C/O       3,105,386.00 0.131 OFFICE 1 STORY           1935 2005 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     706830       4042         
50434322310000790 COUNTY ROAD HOLDINGS LLC        2,359,580.00 0.0919 STORE/OFF/RES           1928 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     679580       4579         
50434322310000810 COLNAGHI WARREN COLNAGHI DANIEL       2,528,612.00 0.16 MULTIFAMILY           1926 1975 0023 01 1 WOOD FRAME     803410      14086         
50434322310000840 176 SUNSET PARKING LLC        2,415,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322310000900 SCHOTTENSTEIN GARY L & SCHOTTENSTEIN TERRI S       3,976,681.00 0.1549 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    2621151       4902       5208       4531                 
50434322310000921 EHRENKRANZ ELIZABETH & EHRENKRANZ SANFORD B       3,770,157.00 0.155 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    2427433       4902       5210       4530                 
50434322310000950 LAMBDIN DEVELOPMENT LIMITED LIABILITY CO        3,485,643.00 0.1546 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    2016401       4863       5156       4510                 
50434322310000971 NISBERG JAY N JAY NISBERG TR TITL HLDR       3,017,740.00 0.1553 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    1970213       4751       5156       4350                 
50434322310001580 159 SUNSET AVENUE LLC        1,207,500.00 0 VACANT                           
50434322310001600 TOLL SHELDON S & TOLL ROBERTA D       2,147,963.00 0.1997 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 05 05 01 2     912778       5275       5801       4888                 
50434322310001620 HOLDER DOUGLAS A SR &        2,117,229.00 0.1997 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 03 05 00 2     891988       5095       5581       4738                 
50434322310001730 MAUDELONDE ENTRPRS INC LIST MANAGEMENT C/O       4,590,641.00 0.517 RESTAURANT           1925 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     940130       8554         
50434322310001751 PALM BEACH ORTHODOX SYNAGOGUE INC        0.00 0.2036 OFFICE 1 STORY           1928 2000 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     346170       2450         
50434322310001840 RAMPELL RICHARD & RAMPELL ELLEN K       5,727,897.00 0.5992 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2846320      17561         
50434322310001900 SUNSET AVENUE CORP        1,044,000.00 0 VACANT COMM                           
50434322310001920 SUNSET AVENUE CORP        1,044,000.00 0 VACANT COMM                           
50434322310001940 SUNSET AVENUE CORP        3,374,425.00 0.7 STORES                           
50434322310002010 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC REAL ESTATE TAX DEPT C/O       3,700,000.00 0 SPRMKT/DRUG STR           1971 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2133930      33394         
50434322310002050 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC        3,600,000.00 1.0985 SPRMKT/DRUG STR                           
50434322310002240 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.08 MUNICIPAL                           
50434322320000010 E R BRADLEYS SALOON SOUTH INC        2,370,062.00 0.1951 STORE/OFF/RES           1923 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     839390      11640         
50434322320000040 PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS INC        2,148,611.00 0.241 OFFICE 1 STORY           1940 1970 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     252690       3136         
50434322320000081 PAME NEWSPAPERS INC        1,300,630.00 0.1033 OFF MULTISTORY           1926 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     490630       7580         
50434322320000100 POINCIANA CAPITAL CORP        770,950.00 0.0574 STORES           1957 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     140950       1980         
50434322320000130 255 ROYAL POINCIANA        991,330.00 0.062 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     310930       4213         
50434322320000141 M B VENTURES OF PALM BEACH        1,522,833.00 0.1446 STORE/OFF/RES 1922 1970 00 02 00 1      65643       1040       1040       1040 1922 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     218630       2926         
50434322320000141 M B VENTURES OF PALM BEACH        1,522,833.00 0.1446 STORE/OFF/RES 1922 1970 00 02 00 1      65643       1040       1040       1040 1925 1970 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     104560       1640         
50434322320000170 FIDELITY FED SAV & LOAN ASSN JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS INC C/O       1,913,721.00 0 FINANCIAL           1973 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     307000       2778         
50434322320000211 MURGAN FAMILY PTNRSHP O S JEYANANDARAJAN C/O       1,192,093.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES 1945 1950 00 04 00 2      87210       2130       2250       2100 1945 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     202770       4466         
50434322320000230 TESTA FAMILY LLC JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS INC C/O       2,406,061.00 0.287 SERV STATIONS           1955 1985 0002 01 2 FIRE RESIS     278000       3360         
50434322320000280 TESTA FAMILY LLC        2,093,491.00 0.2462 STORE/OFF/RES           1915 1965 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      54940       1080         
50434322320000280 TESTA FAMILY LLC        2,093,491.00 0.2462 STORE/OFF/RES           1946 1970 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME     321280       6345         
50434322320000321 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP BRENNER REAL ESTATE GROUP INC C/O       2,154,090.00 0.1693 STORES           1923 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     134200       1424         
50434322320000321 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP BRENNER REAL ESTATE GROUP INC C/O       2,154,090.00 0.1693 STORES           1925 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     692390       7271         
50434322320000351 VESENAZ HOLDING CORP C/O LANDRY'S RESTAURANTS       342,000.00 0.0436 STORE/OFF/RES                           
50434323000010030 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SOUTHEAST FACILITY SERVICE OFFICE       0.00 0 FEDERAL           1936 1976 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1200650      10656         
50434323000040020 MASTICS GEORGE E & CAROLE A MASTICS CAROLE A       758,178.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1970 03 03 01 2     507691       5272       6035       4406                 
50434323000040030 SEAVIEW PARTNERS LLC        4,980,938.00 0.44 VACANT                           
50434323000040040 SEAVIEW PARTNERS LLC        1,419,600.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323000040060 WELTROTH LAURI K        12,529,008.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 01 00 1      84012       1034       1482          1                 
50434323000040060 WELTROTH LAURI K        12,529,008.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1996 05 06 01 2    1907019       9061       9823       8875                 
50434323000040070 DAGOSTINO THOMAS        2,181,791.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 03 03 01 1     688549       3716       3990       3281                 
50434323000040080 BECKER DEAN        1,793,907.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1985 04 03 01 2    1098881       4216       4705       3745                 
50434323000040090 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL WACHOVIA BANK C/O       1,337,500.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323000040110 AKBARIAN M &        6,362,412.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 00 05 00 2    2030343       3833       3868       3780                 
50434323000040110 AKBARIAN M &        6,362,412.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 01 02 00 1     120329        869        943        451                 
50434323000040110 AKBARIAN M &        6,362,412.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 01 02 00 2     137800        777        956        442                 
50434323010000010 BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH        0.00 0 RELIGIOUS           1920 1986 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     471570       4684         
50434323010000010 BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH        0.00 0 RELIGIOUS           1925 1986 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     918300       7870         
50434323010000010 BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH        0.00 0 RELIGIOUS           1930 1986 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1833400      18984         
50434323010000010 BETHESDA BY THE SEA CHURCH        0.00 0 RELIGIOUS           1974 1974 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      94640        597         
50434323010000130 WALDE WILLIAM L        3,283,148.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 04 05 01 2    1632077       7655       8197       6869                 
50434323010000141 BROBERG PETER S TR        9,223,431.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1990 00 01 00 2     153275       1537       1620       1344                 
50434323010000141 BROBERG PETER S TR        9,223,431.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1990 00 01 01 1      58311        467        597        423                 
50434323010000141 BROBERG PETER S TR        9,223,431.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 2000 00 05 00 3    1517800       6285       7427       5882                 
50434323010000142 HIMMEL KENNETH A &        5,653,436.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 07 00 2    2055537       8567       9597       7354                 
50434323010000142 HIMMEL KENNETH A &        5,653,436.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 02 02 01 2     239603       2907       4006       1568                 
50434323010000161 MCINTOSH HENRY P & SUSAN R MC INTOSH SUSAN R       2,345,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 04 05 01 2    1534329       9095       9394       8646                 
50434323010000172 BRAUER STEPHEN F & CAMILLA T        5,798,325.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 07 00 2    2337208       8915      10410       6744                 
50434323010000180 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD LLC JOAN KRUPSKAS C/O       24,716,589.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1935 1970 00 02 01 2     118113       1908       2267       1134                 
50434323010000180 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD LLC JOAN KRUPSKAS C/O       24,716,589.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1935 1990 05 09 01 2    2675783      14434      16661      13138                 
50434323010000190 FLAGLER DRIVE HOLDINGS LLC JOAN KRUPSKAS C/O       23,951,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1998 05 07 01 3    2872806      15112      18677      11627                 
50434323020000040 CORBY ROBERT W        2,231,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 04 04 01 2     744685       6882       7524       6492                 
50434323020000050 TRAVERSE NORMAN & TRAVERSE NASSRINE       3,518,760.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1979 1989 04 03 01 1     619430       4740       4969       4479                 
50434323030000010 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL WACHOVIA BANK C/O       1,001,250.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323040000010 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL        15,500,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1925 1970 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1390330      15148         
50434323040000010 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL        15,500,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1927 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    5444550      43485         
50434323040000020 GARDNER TATIANA S GARDNER GEORGE P TR       2,408,557.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1970 03 03 00 2      37838       4462       5290       3305                 
50434323040000051 BEACH NANCY A & BEACH JOHN       1,732,317.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 03 03 00 2     271000       3291       3648       2556                 
50434323040000070 PRESSLY JAMES G JR & PRESSLY KATHRYN S       1,543,868.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 00 03 00 1     200398       2702       2860       2255                 
50434323050010040 ROSALIND LLC        2,311,796.00 0 MULTIFAMILY           1927 1990 0014 01 2 FIRE RESIS     350220       6336         
50434323050010061 BALLANTINE JOHN W &        2,586,102.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1144977       3719       3892       3368                 
50434323050010062 KELLY ARTHUR L & KELLY DIANE R       2,194,287.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 01 2     983402       3193       3367       2786                 
50434323050010063 BARTHOLOMAY WILLIAM C C/O WILLIS OF ILLINOIS       1,915,341.00 0.08 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 00 2     713256       2317       2449       2008                 
50434323050010064 SCHNEIDER IRA &        2,002,127.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1116965       3627       3800       3276                 
50434323050010065 BRAZILIAN ASSOC #2 LTD HOLLY ADLER C/O       0.00 0.28 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434323050010122 BRAZILIAN ASSOC II LTD HOLLY ADLER C/O       57.00 0.19 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434323050010123 ABELL HELEN H        1,067,681.00 0.1 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1144977       3719       3892       3368                 
50434323050010124 TOWNSEND PENELOPE D        2,116,047.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 01 1     983402       3193       3367       2786                 
50434323050010125 SWEET PHILLIP W JR & SWEET NANCY       1,480,826.00 0.09 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 03 00 2     713256       2317       2449       2008                 
50434323050010126 DAY JOSEPH C & JOSEPH & DIANA DAY ET AL TR HLDRS       1,757,630.00 0.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 04 00 2    1121767       3643       3816       3292                 
50434323050010190 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        618,998.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 1      51475       1770       1770       1770                 
50434323050010190 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        618,998.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 2     127535       2778       3203       2694                 
50434323050010221 WOLFE RICHARD W        3,966,355.00 0.1799 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 07 01 2.5    2454198       6081       6600       5522                 
50434323050010222 WOLFE RICHARD W & WOLFE CAROL M       1,375,231.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1970 04 04 00 2     140226       2528       2632       2466                 
50434323050010223 WHALOU PROPERTIES II LLC        862,392.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050010241 GOULD GEORGE D &        3,564,072.00 0.1788 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 07 01 2.5    1941108       5611       5839       5236                 
50434323050020011 ALLISON J RICHARD & ALLISON ANNETTE D       1,588,044.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1953 1985 04 04 00 2     323080       5104       5560       4503                 
50434323050020050 WATKINS CHRISTINE        2,205,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1910 2000 05 05 00 2     284235       3336       3560       3240                 
50434323050020050 WATKINS CHRISTINE        2,205,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1      92636        798        798        798                 
50434323050020070 WELFELD MIMI A        411,241.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1980 00 03 00 1     180760       2176       2176       2176                 
50434323050020090 FRIESE FAMILY TRUST FRIESE PAUL TRUSTEE       552,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1960 00 01 00 2      68973        800        800        800                 
50434323050020090 FRIESE FAMILY TRUST FRIESE PAUL TRUSTEE       552,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 00 03 00 2     166222       1907       1954       1882                 
50434323050020110 SHEHADI EVELYN SHEHADI ELIZABETH       1,485,265.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 02 00 2      78030       1195       1296        960                 
50434323050020110 SHEHADI EVELYN SHEHADI ELIZABETH       1,485,265.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 03 00 2     160046       2064       2267       1960                 
50434323050020130 SHIVERICK PAUL &        3,322,419.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1474385       5192       5697       4772                 
50434323050020150 BIDWELL BENNETT E & BIDWELL PAULA N       3,265,980.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 04 01 1    1415772       4951       5412       4407                 
50434323050020170 YELVINGTON GARY REV TRUST OF 1997 YELVINGTON GARY TR       3,675,936.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 2    1837281       5354       5528       4984                 
50434323050020190 GAGE JOHN Z & GAGE KAREN S       2,130,353.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1918 1980 00 03 00 2     299078       2432       2764       2290                 
50434323050020210 DEZIEL ROBERT E        1,512,553.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1985 00 03 01 2     420336       4376       4536       4342                 
50434323050020231 HEYDON PETER N & HENRIETTA M        1,552,800.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 03 01 2      29552       2881       3003       2617                 
50434323050020232 SHAFFER MARGARET S        864,921.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1990 00 03 00 2     585083       3318       3384       3164                 
50434323050020261 STUART GLORIA G        1,675,677.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 03 00 1      29546       2729       2928       2438                 
50434323050030011 KASSATLY EDWARD M & ROBERT F KASSATLY       1,272,644.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 03 00 2      13927       2731       2944       2560                 
50434323050030011 KASSATLY EDWARD M & ROBERT F KASSATLY       1,272,644.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1960 00 01 00 1      72337       1024       1024       1024                 
50434323050030012 337 339 COCOANUT ROW LLC        1,388,931.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      30321        514        514        514                 
50434323050030012 337 339 COCOANUT ROW LLC        1,388,931.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1955 00 03 01 2     171457       3132       3156       3102                 
50434323050030013 TRANSAMERICAN PROPERTIES INC        1,106,842.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1928 1950 0006 01 1 WOOD FRAME      11590       4976         
50434323050030030 GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E & JEFFRY GIANGRANDE TR TITL HLDR       3,571,934.00 0.188 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 04 05 01 2    1789416       4506       4832       4078                 
50434323050030130 BASS JACK M JR & BASS MELINDA       3,555,435.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1794081       5027       5387       4614                 
50434323050030150 HOLLIS EARL A JR TR        3,682,821.00 0.2066 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1922455       5391       5897       4940                 
50434323050030171 THREE 24 BRAZILIAN AVE INC MIGUEL GUZMAN C/O       1,429,298.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1995 04 03 00 2     373871       2321       2589       2214                 
50434323050030410 ANTHONY RUTH D TR SUN TRUST BANK TRUSTEE C/O       3,533,471.00 0.1719 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2032706       4246       4726       3835                 
50434323050030421 MENDLER HENRY & LAWTON SUZANNE       3,259,490.00 0.1379 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2145389       4485       4956       4050                 
50434323050030441 RUSSO JOSEPH L & RUSSO CAROL B       3,340,036.00 0.1722 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 05 01 3    2014290       4208       4686       3795                 
50434323050040011 DEAN MARGARET M        3,230,146.00 0.1872 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 04 01 3    2929118       4958       5996       4421                 
50434323050040012 KINNEAR FINANCIAL CONSULTING LTD PENGROWTH MGMT LTD C/O       3,844,294.00 0.1765 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 05 01 3    2413965       5729       6744       5231                 
50434323050040040 455 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE CORP        57.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050040090 449 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE LLC        1,518,688.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1948 1958 06 06 00 1      98688       2325       2401       2305                 
50434323050040110 STEWARD GRACE VANNER        1,428,641.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1965 00 01 00 1       7749       1229       1305       1053                 
50434323050040230 AULT MICHAEL VAN C & VAN CLIEF FAITH       1,281,104.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1940 00 01 00 1       4367        851        880        880                 
50434323050040230 AULT MICHAEL VAN C & VAN CLIEF FAITH       1,281,104.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1944 00 01 00 1       6492       1477       1607       1468                 
50434323050040283 YUNGHANNS PATRICIA        924,168.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1975 00 02 00 2     209451       3085       3238       2932                 
50434323050040360 KEITEL FREDERICK J III        1,608,438.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 03 02 00 1     154483       2033       2033       2033                 
50434323050040380 BARKER JAMES H & DOUGLAS KENNETH W JR       2,047,210.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 00 2     316979       5049       5598       4043                 
50434323050040410 OKAIN DEBORAH L        1,853,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 00 04 00 2     398662       4168       4579       3853                 
50434323050040430 CHRISTMAN PAUL R &        2,559,435.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1980 02 02 00 2      88418       1035       1294        970                 
50434323050040430 CHRISTMAN PAUL R &        2,559,435.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1924 1990 03 03 01 2     735527       2776       3184       2408                 
50434323050040450 BRAZILIAN AVENUE LLC C/O STEVE DATTELS       3,153,845.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2    1391673       4093       4608       3586                 
50434323050040470 RODDY CHARLES T        832,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1948 00 03 01 2      11686       3617       3850       3229                 
50434323050040510 BRANSTROM WILLIAM J III & BRANSTROM ROBIN R       1,770,805.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 00 2      28527       2505       2554       2484                 
50434323050040530 TARA HAMPTON INC        3,941,584.00 0.19 MFR <10 UNITS 1999 1999 03 04 01 2    2180137       4710       5534       4055                 
50434323050040541 TELESE NANCY E        2,392,112.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 04 01 2    1914671       4850       5676       4194                 
50434323050050060 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050050100 SMITH MATTHEW K & SMITH TRACY E       3,958,192.00 0.2296 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 01 2    1992244       5003       5250       4525                 
50434323050050131 SALTZMAN IRVIN & SALTZMAN BARBARA R       2,511,418.00 0.165 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 05 01 2    1566946       4361       4683       3974                 
50434323050050151 FOWLER MARK S FOWLER MARK S TR       2,413,354.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 03 01 2    1643347       4574       4848       4199                 
50434323050050261 360 COCOANUT ROW LLC        3,190,540.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2005 03 05 01 1    1883610       4556       4813       4196                 
50434323050050262 WINTER RICHARD & WINTER BELLA       2,838,224.00 0.2 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1983296       5113       5496       4712                 
50434323050050350 PORTER HERBERT R JR & PORTER ALINA M       2,737,108.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 06 01 2    1485356       5665       6116       5296                 
50434323050050380 MORTARA VIRGINIA        2,359,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 00 03 01 2     426680       3553       3692       3419                 
50434323050050380 MORTARA VIRGINIA        2,359,101.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1949 00 02 00 2     130388       2195       2268       2100                 
50434323050050410 EDENS ROBERT L III EDENS ROBERT LUTHER III TR       1,609,586.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 03 02 01 1     283783       1779       1796       1772                 
50434323050050430 GOODERHAM EDWARD D TR ET AL        1,453,653.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1948 00 02 00 2     116733       2109       2216       1986                 
50434323050050450 430 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE LLC        3,081,971.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1971 1971 0005 01 2 FIRE RESIS     445400       7548         
50434323050050490 CASTILFORTI LLC        1,583,181.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1951 1990 00 04 00 2     264693       3167       3321       3066                 
50434323050050510 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050050540 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050060010 T H COURT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        4,698,515.00 0.43 MOTEL           1918 1985 0055 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2212140      32758         
50434323050060070 LOCKS MARK        1,325,705.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 00 00 2     357517       3083       3292       2744                 
50434323050060090 HAYMES ANNE MARIE        1,633,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 00 00 00 2     358296       3089       3292       2753                 
50434323050060110 BUCKLAND PETER & FIRST NATIONAL PAYMENT SVCS C/O       1,560,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 1     234202       1948       2060       1900                 
50434323050060130 FRANKEL FRANK        1,412,341.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1955 00 01 00 2      65983        765        861        826                 
50434323050060130 FRANKEL FRANK        1,412,341.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 03 00 2     239427       2631       2760       2594                 
50434323050060150 SLOMOWITZ MARVIN & SLOMOWITZ ISOBEL       5,362,117.00 0.4104 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 01 2    1784596       6269       6977       5667                 
50434323050060181 SADLER SHANNON G        280,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1949 00 01 00 1      39216        512        512        512                 
50434323050060181 SADLER SHANNON G        280,640.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 02 00 1     144342       1448       1475       1451                 
50434323050060201 PUCILLO BIAGINA        281,592.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1949 00 01 00 1      37414        523        552        516                 
50434323050060201 PUCILLO BIAGINA        281,592.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1955 00 02 00 1     145262       1416       1472       1407                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 00 02 00 1      97965       1279       1362       1248                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1941 00 01 00 2      84602       1628       1700       1460                 
50434323050060221 JESSIE GENTRY GANT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HOADLEY THOMAS A       1,397,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 00 01 00 1      29504        459        459        459                 
50434323050060251 CIOC ERICA & IOANA CIOC & DOINA CIOC-BENAC       1,166,319.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1956 1970 00 03 01 1     132248       2259       2293       2245                 
50434323050060252 CSC BRAZILIAN LP CEEBRAID SIGNAL CORP C/O       1,584,354.00 0.16 OFFICE 1 STORY           1930 2007 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     579800       4671         
50434323050060320 DOUBLE L FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LAURA ANTHONY JOHNSTON C/O       1,352,293.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1956 1956 04 04 00 2      32430       2771       3116       2600                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1936 00 01 00 1       4517        264        264        264                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1940 00 01 00 1       8234        470        483        467                 
50434323050060340 MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B MACGREGOR CONSTANCE B TR       902,228.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 1      22339       1557       1872       1428                 
50434323050060360 PRESSLY JAMES G JR & PRESSLY KATHRYN       1,468,521.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1970 00 02 00 1     132629       1571       1911       1293                 
50434323050060380 HAFT ALLISON R HAFT STUART J       1,676,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 02 00 2      73926       1212       1212       1212                 
50434323050060380 HAFT ALLISON R HAFT STUART J       1,676,029.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 00 2     281149       2490       2870       2380                 
50434323050060420 KANE DAVID P        363,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1955 04 03 00 2     161035       2803       2952       2760                 
50434323050060420 KANE DAVID P        363,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1941 00 02 00 2      37178        637        909          1                 
50434323050060450 SCULLY JOHN S        4,878,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2001 05 06 01 2    3081355       7692       8474       7364                 
50434323050060490 GOLDENBERG MARVIN MARVIN GOLDENBERG TR TITL HLDR       1,488,483.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1167948       3941       4481       3422                 
50434323050060510 KENT JORIE B KENT JORIE B TR       2,356,896.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1200372       4361       4883       3698                 
50434323050060530 REED GENE        2,438,438.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1094998       3797       4108       3255                 
50434323050060541 CAIN BARBARA A        1,732,281.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 01 2    1122690       3787       4063       3255                 
50434323050070011 GROBE-SNYDER LOUISE        2,072,869.00 0.16 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 00 00 2     899145       3735       3943       3382                 
50434323050070012 HOVSEPIAN SUREN        917,417.00 0.13 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 00 00 2     899385       3736       3944       3383                 
50434323050070030 SULLIVAN JOHN A & SULLIVAN SHARLA J       1,220,686.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 01 01 00 1      58152        572        760        468                 
50434323050070030 SULLIVAN JOHN A & SULLIVAN SHARLA J       1,220,686.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 00 02 00 2     299163       2780       2900       2729                 
50434323050070050 HERON JEAN ELLEN HERON JEAN ELLEN TR       1,413,895.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1950 00 03 00 2      77393       1598       1640       1640                 
50434323050070050 HERON JEAN ELLEN HERON JEAN ELLEN TR       1,413,895.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1960 05 04 00 2     169065       2641       2790       2582                 
50434323050070060 KARAYIANNAKIS ANNA K        1,041,862.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS           1960 1960 0005 01 2 FIRE RESIS     160950       3993         
50434323050070070 PIERCE POONSRI POONSRI PIERCE TR TITL HLDR       649,562.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1940 04 04 00 2      52784       2497       2599       2471                 
50434323050070070 PIERCE POONSRI POONSRI PIERCE TR TITL HLDR       649,562.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1957 1960 00 03 00 2      22596       1143       1199       1033                 
50434323050070080 ANDRE LAURA        1,508,810.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1962 1962 00 03 01 2     237758       3524       3694       3378                 
50434323050070090 JAMGOCHIAN GEORGE M & JAMGOCHIAN DEBORAH S       1,325,371.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1949 1955 00 04 00 2       7171       2664       2888       2500                 
50434323050070100 WAHLESTEDT LISA T & WAHLESTEDT CLAES       1,091,100.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 00 02 00 2     240279       3069       3314       2964                 
50434323050070110 THREE 50 REALTY CORP LOVE REALTY GEDNEY STATION C/O       6,000,000.00 0.7232 STORE/OFF/RES           1952 1995 0013 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2494400      26569         
50434323050070181 FORTIN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC        1,606,076.00 0.1386 STORES           1962 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     153680       1729         
50434323050070182 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.1036 FOREST/PK/REC                           
50434323050070231 MWB FAMILY TRUST OCONNELL TARA TR &       4,663,505.00 0.2419 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    2590451       6173       6427       5776                 
50434323050070270 MAY MICHAEL J        1,909,718.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 04 01 2    1536228       3949       4256       3585                 
50434323050070290 229 CHILEAN AVENUE LLC        2,834,118.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 05 00 2    1469552       3811       4220       3384                 
50434323050070310 REED GORDON P & MARY G MARY G GORDON       401,128.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1970 03 03 00 1     155478       2174       2230       2122                 
50434323050070330 STEPHAN MCGLONE MARYLYNNE &        2,406,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 04 03 02 2    1075295       4178       4330       3968                 
50434323050070350 CLAGGETT BARBARA C BARBARA C CLAGGETT TR TITL HLDR       757,474.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 04 03 02 2    1075295       4178       4330       3968                 
50434323050070371 CANTOR MABEL 2008 REV TRUST        1,222,855.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 00 02 00 1     214881       1506       1589       1511                 
50434323050070372 HOBERG FREDERICK W        1,684,468.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1965 00 03 00 1     217876       2596       2846       2272                 
50434323050080010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.4 MUNICIPAL           2004 2004 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      58030        792         
50434323050080010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.4 MUNICIPAL           2004 2004 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2912060      22775         
50434323050080050 SALEEBY SHIRLEY        1,001,150.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1917 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     157400       3080         
50434323050080060 CBRS REALTY LTD        1,718,631.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1948 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     371430       8400         
50434323050080080 PBI LLC        2,952,909.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1990 0004 01 1 WOOD FRAME     952250      12035         
50434323050080110 GILBERTSON E NORDIN & GILBERTSON B CHARLOTTE       402,395.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1918 1929 00 03 00 2       7025       2926       3321       2673                 
50434323050080110 GILBERTSON E NORDIN & GILBERTSON B CHARLOTTE       402,395.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1918 1936 00 01 00 1       1342        520        520        520                 
50434323050080150 AMORE J TRUST        2,617,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 00 02 00 1     169851       2548       2829       2208                 
50434323050080150 AMORE J TRUST        2,617,515.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 00 01 00 2       3748       2230       2706       2097                 
50434323050080180 OHANNESSIAN ANTOINE        1,968,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1937 00 03 00 1      79357       2074       2193       1800                 
50434323050080180 OHANNESSIAN ANTOINE        1,968,878.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1950 00 03 01 2     232402       3243       3278       3228                 
50434323050080210 CHANT CORP        1,759,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1911 1970 00 03 00 2      12413       2808       2882       2387                 
50434323050080210 CHANT CORP        1,759,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1915 1950 00 02 00 1       4283        945       1098        666                 
50434323050080241 ALNA LLC        1,418,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1950 00 01 00 1      22752        432        432        432                 
50434323050080241 ALNA LLC        1,418,895.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1970 00 02 00 1     119718       1605       1616       1600                 
50434323050080270 LOWDEN ROBERT D & BEVERLY C LOWDEN BEVERLY C       386,554.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1909 1985 00 03 00 2     219095       2291       2650       1972                 
50434323050080291 COLLINS JAMES L & COLLINS SUSAN S       824,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1985 00 02 00 1      93490       2141       2176       2176                 
50434323050080311 SHUBERT NANCY E        1,353,739.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 00 02 00 1     233515       1550       1834       1238                 
50434323050080430 SULLIVAN A MICHAEL JR        529,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1955 00 01 00 2      78082        942       1177        589                 
50434323050080430 SULLIVAN A MICHAEL JR        529,202.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1970 00 04 00 2     283045       2812       3157       2684                 
50434323050080440 ZOSLOW SYLVIA L ZOSLOW SYLVIA L TR       355,382.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      47125        630        798        399                 
50434323050080440 ZOSLOW SYLVIA L ZOSLOW SYLVIA L TR       355,382.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     180780       2407       2442       2392                 
50434323050080450 OSMENA MARIA VICTORIA R TR TEMPLETON & COMPANY LLP C/O       2,243,644.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1970 00 02 00 1      10799       1871       2060       1518                 
50434323050080470 DIXON FRANCIGENE S YOUNG SHERIDAN TR       1,086,913.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1939 1975 00 03 00 1     410939       4135       4361       3735                 
50434323050080490 FLYNN MICHAEL J & FLYNN ANNE J       1,704,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 04 04 01 3     504420       4644       4837       4569                 
50434323050080490 FLYNN MICHAEL J & FLYNN ANNE J       1,704,734.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 01 00 2      61800        709        849        400                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1910 1950 03 01 00 1       6282        871        930        846                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1937 02 01 00 1       3794        627        627        627                 
50434323050080510 RETRIEVER ASSET HLDNG CORP        1,625,802.00 0.23 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 05 04 00 2      16904       3558       3558       3558                 
50434323050090010 THREE SEVENTY FIVE SOUTH COUNTY ASSOC/GEDNEY STATION       5,000,000.00 0.5539 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     555410       5421         
50434323050090010 THREE SEVENTY FIVE SOUTH COUNTY ASSOC/GEDNEY STATION       5,000,000.00 0.5539 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1744690      11271         
50434323050090090 SPEYER ALEXANDER C JR        1,303,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 2     136619       1856       1862       1842                 
50434323050090090 SPEYER ALEXANDER C JR        1,303,811.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1964 00 02 00 1      49959        666        666        666                 
50434323050090110 PAOLOZZI THOMAS F &        1,542,405.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1960 00 02 00 1     149275       1836       1982       1823                 
50434323050090130 BROWNSTONE HOLDINGS GROUP GOLDFINGER & LASSAR C/O       1,463,574.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 03 00 2     341677       3569       3705       3620                 
50434323050090150 TONELLI JOHN        1,589,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1933 00 02 00 2      84585       1978       2027       1904                 
50434323050090150 TONELLI JOHN        1,589,345.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 00 2     184886       2359       2523       2313                 
50434323050090171 FARAWAY SHORES LTD        2,014,138.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1988 04 03 00 1     231954       2568       2637       2577                 
50434323050090201 FAIRBANKS DANIEL J        1,336,533.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1985 00 03 01 2     273729       3500       3624       3450                 
50434323050090230 RITTERBUSH STEPHEN W & RITTERBUSH KAREN J &       1,852,782.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1912 1980 00 03 00 2     643637       3007       3206       2946                 
50434323050090230 RITTERBUSH STEPHEN W & RITTERBUSH KAREN J &       1,852,782.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1975 00 02 00 2      84420       1077       1095       1050                 
50434323050090250 ROWAN LISA        2,872,204.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 02 00 2      69410        816        960        480                 
50434323050090250 ROWAN LISA        2,872,204.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1993 04 04 01 2     557697       4844       5002       4582                 
50434323050090290 NASSER JOSEPH A        424,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1945 00 01 00 2      55686        823        968        484                 
50434323050090290 NASSER JOSEPH A        424,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 04 03 00 2     219256       2681       2781       2720                 
50434323050090310 DICKSON DORIS R        395,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1945 02 01 00 2      55686        823        968        484                 
50434323050090310 DICKSON DORIS R        395,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 04 03 00 2     216440       2541       2607       2573                 
50434323050090480 GRANT RICHARD H JR & C/O ROBINSON REALTY & PROP MGMT       3,598,789.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 05 00 2    1357909       7526       8442       6318                 
50434323050090580 HIGHLANDS MOBILE HOME PARK & SALES INC        1,097,415.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1992 00 02 00 2      86947       1240       1377       1068                 
50434323050090580 HIGHLANDS MOBILE HOME PARK & SALES INC        1,097,415.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1992 00 02 00 2     168848       1261       1261       1261                 
50434323050090600 ALBAN CO        1,153,801.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1980 02 02 00 1     145680       1917       2035       1672                 
50434323050100010 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        2,345,810.00 0.72 PKG LT / MH PK                           
50434323050100070 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        1,186,380.00 0.14 VACANT                           
50434323050100090 GILBERT HENRY A III        888,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1936 00 01 00 1      51138        868       1024        528                 
50434323050100090 GILBERT HENRY A III        888,071.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 00 02 00 2     181812       2583       2853       2432                 
50434323050100110 CELEDINAS RAY S & CELEDINAS KIM R       1,836,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 1      23648        748        966        420                 
50434323050100110 CELEDINAS RAY S & CELEDINAS KIM R       1,836,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 03 00 2      96169       2547       2552       2552                 
50434323050100180 HOLLIS EARL A INC        1,187,375.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050100240 CHURCH OF BETHESDA BY THE SEA        0.00 0 STORES           1935 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     376790       4710         
50434323050100280 RHINO REAL ESTATE INC        4,242,109.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1983 2007 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1732590       5998         
50434323050100320 RISOTTO REALTY        1,443,070.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1953 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     193070       2601         
50434323050100340 RISOTTO REALTY        1,761,275.00 0 RESTAURANT           1935 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     510490       4280         
50434323050100360 HOLLIS EARL A INC        1,593,333.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1950 1970 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     343150       5284         
50434323050100380 BROBERG GUSTAVE T JR & BROBERG STEWART C       1,928,520.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1986 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     678520       4341         
50434323050100400 RINKER RUBY S REV LIVING TRUST RINKER RUBY S TRUSTEE       1,875,867.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1962 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     624550       5536         
50434323050100420 KAHN EDWARD & KAHN ADELE       765,737.00 0 STORES           1928 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      46120       1931         
50434323050100440 KAHN EDWARD & KAHN ADELE       2,611,673.00 0 STORES           1950 1970 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     110010       3379         
50434323050110110 334 CHILIAN LLC        2,102,723.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1979 00 07 00 2     273275       4116       4582       3737                 
50434323050110200 DEVENOW MAUDETTE H MAUDETTE H DEVENOW TR TITL HLDR       2,158,474.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 1    1272725       4512       4812       4195                 
50434323050110221 HOLTZMAN SEYMOUR &        2,676,377.00 0.1794 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 04 05 01 2    1775629       4491       4927       4146                 
50434323050110250 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.57 CULTURAL           1994 1994 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      16890        346         
50434323050110250 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0.57 CULTURAL           1994 1994 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      26910        304         
50434323050110330 PRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH INC       0.00 0 CULTURAL           2004 2004 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1563780       6260         
50434323050110360 MADDOCK PAUL L JR & BESSEMER TRUST CO OF FL TRS       3,607,476.00 0 PROF OFFICES           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1731070       6474         
50434323050110390 CINQUE PARTNERS LTD        784,894.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1949 00 03 00 2     132962       2596       2613       2613                 
50434323050110410 L G LIMA LLC        3,776,047.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     256680       4365         
50434323050110460 341 PERUVIAN LLC        3,320,651.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1990 00 03 00 2     454693       2519       2563       2500                 
50434323050110460 341 PERUVIAN LLC        3,320,651.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1967 1990 00 03 01 1     948904       5483       6307       4476                 
50434323050110530 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        4,473,249.00 0 STORES           1950 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     346900       2058         
50434323050110530 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        4,473,249.00 0 STORES           1958 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     686460       4868         
50434323050120190 BEARD ANSON M JR & BEARD DEBRA W       1,643,717.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1950 04 02 00 2     519439       3873       4541       2873                 
50434323050120211 WIENERT KATHERINE B        464,434.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     499779       1390       1390       1390                 
50434323050120212 BERNHARD WILLIAM L & CAHILL CATHERINE       1,045,233.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     497257       1383       1442       1358                 
50434323050120213 CATHEDRAL ESTATES LTD MS. KIM MORGAN CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN       1,063,274.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     515714       1546       1546       1546                 
50434323050120231 STEELE T GARRICK        1,042,356.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     494241       1422       1422       1422                 
50434323050120232 FINDLAY KATHERINE D        929,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     380145        927        927        927                 
50434323050120233 BLAIR BOWEN W BLAIR CO C/O       1,176,052.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 00 00 00 2     626192       1966       2002       1942                 
50434323050120251 SANDERSON FREDA L        131,820.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120252 BERNHARD WILLIAM L & CAHILL CATHERINE &       131,820.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120253 FINDLAY KATHERINE D        91,260.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050120254 OHERRON EDWARD M JR TR &        91,260.00 0.02 VACANT                           
50434323050120255 BOLDIN WIENERT KATJA        50,700.00 0.01 VACANT                           
50434323050120256 BLAIR BOWEN W BLAIR CO C/O       0.00 0.01 VACANT                           
50434323050120340 DEBENEDICTIS DANIELLE E        1,953,695.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1995 00 03 01 2    1204624       4200       4200       4200                 
50434323050120360 BEARD NANCY N & BEARD JOHN L       5,082,287.00 0.36 MFR <10 UNITS 1999 1999 03 03 01 2    2150747       6128       8440       5056                 
50434323050120410 DOUBLE L FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LAURA ANTHONY JOHNSTON C/O       1,348,556.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1950 1953 00 03 01 2      29925       2907       3277       2704                 
50434323050120430 VANDERGRIFT JAMES B VANDERGRIFT JAMES B TR       1,542,072.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 00 02 00 2      10519       2396       2500       2352                 
50434323050120520 MURPHY GARY L TR        1,552,547.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 00 04 00 2     233154       2847       2990       2636                 
50434323050120540 NASSAU SQ CO OP APTS INC        0.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050130100 FRISBIE DAVID W DAVID W FRISBIE TR TITL HLDR       2,461,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY                           
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1925 1975 0009 01 1 WOOD FRAME     157180       3932         
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1925 1975 0077 01 1 WOOD FRAME     968140      25827         
50434323050140010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        4,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1962 1975 0045 01 2 FIRE RESIS     717010      16902         
50434323050140030 DUNCAN MIMI G MIMI DUNCAN TR TITL HLDR       737,375.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     515890       1584         
50434323050140030 DUNCAN MIMI G MIMI DUNCAN TR TITL HLDR       737,375.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1139660       8357         
50434323050140130 LOVE III LLC        2,508,151.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES                           
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1958 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      68070       1046         
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1958 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     234230       2524         
50434323050140170 326 PERUVIAN AVE LLLP        1,642,793.00 0 STORES           1972 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      89270       1067         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     265880       2017         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     832310       7163         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1987 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1182780       7358         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1988 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     180090       1190         
50434323050140190 VIA 313 1/2 WORTH AVENUE LTD        7,094,095.00 0.57 STORES           1999 1999 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     282920       1794         
50434323050140241 LOVE II LLC GEDNEY STATION       2,682,710.00 0 STORES           1952 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     611350       6742         
50434323050140242 CHANEL INC DIRECTOR OF TAX DEPT C/O       10,627,792.00 0.4 STORES           1929 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3222580      22047         
50434323050140331 LOVE LLC        6,000,000.00 0.2583 STORES           1929 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     605360       7779         
50434323050140391 NEW PALM        4,074,944.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1929 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1199590       8443         
50434323050140430 WORTH AVENUE HOLDINGS LLC        2,736,730.00 0 STORES           1925 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     724230       2559         
50434323050140510 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        7,300,000.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     370410       7780         
50434323050140510 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        7,300,000.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     975990      20526         
50434323050150010 PERUVIAN AVENUE CORP        5,424,130.00 1.38 PKG LT / MH PK                           
50434323050150200 LOVE LLC GEDNEY STATION       1,283,286.00 0 WAREH/DIST TERM           1956 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      30800       1050         
50434323050150220 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050150280 LENDAN INC        11,674,980.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1958 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2956230      35525         
50434323050150340 LOVE LLC GEDNEY STATION       6,752,900.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1929 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1126700      12886         
50434323050150380 PA FL ASSOC HOWE & ADDINGTON C/O       7,834,870.00 0 STORES           1950 2005 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2209870       9932         
50434323050150420 MIKLOR EQUITIES INC        3,234,270.00 0 STORES           1940 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     359270       3500         
50434323050150440 237-243 WORTH AVENUE LTD PARTNERSHIP REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PRTNS C/O       7,112,845.00 0 STORES           1925 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1487470       8528         
50434323050150480 HOLZER JANE B        6,708,300.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     443630       4732         
50434323050150480 HOLZER JANE B        6,708,300.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     639670       5643         
50434323050150520 MADDEN FAMILY ASSOCIATES LTD ANTHONY MARINO JR C/O       7,517,120.00 0 STORES           1950 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3298370      16374         
50434323050160010 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD        5,401,968.00 0 STORES           1945 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     380090       6750         
50434323050160090 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES II LP        1,162,819.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 00 03 00 1      39642       2486       2734       2300                 
50434323050160110 FOX YOLANDE & CHERIF GUELLAL % FRED GOBIC       1,366,006.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 1960 00 03 00 1     246482       2070       2178       1873                 
50434323050160130 SECOND WORTH COMPANY LLC        23,600,000.00 1.01 DEPT STORE           2000 2000 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF   18342810      48578         
50434323050160160 LEFKOWITZ ELISE G 2005 C TRUST LEFKOWITZ ELISE G 2005 M TRUST       2,211,356.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 03 03 00 1     523587       3064       3221       2807                 
50434323050160250 MARUCCI GEORGE JR        1,789,557.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 03 03 00 2     647582       3488       4069       3057                 
50434323050160270 KELLER MICHAEL I VEALE DANIEL L       1,348,160.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1975 00 02 00 2      53766        742        756        720                 
50434323050160270 KELLER MICHAEL I VEALE DANIEL L       1,348,160.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1920 1975 00 03 01 2     178154       2827       2827       2827                 
50434323050160361 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.01 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050160380 WHALOU PROPERTIES III LLC        19,552,213.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1974 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    8545020      49401         
50434323050160600 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD LOVE REALTY  C/O       6,200,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1971 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1504950      10716         
50434323050160600 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD LOVE REALTY  C/O       6,200,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1979 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      54870        156         
50434323050170011 WORTH AVENUE ASSOC LTD        34,500,000.00 2.02 SH CTR CMMITY           1979 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    1635080      37017         
50434323050170011 WORTH AVENUE ASSOC LTD        34,500,000.00 2.02 SH CTR CMMITY           1979 1990 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF   11559640      91638         
50434323050170012 WORTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES LTD THE GOODMAN CO PHILIPS POINT C/O       7,347,480.00 0 DEPT STORE           1979 1990 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    7347480      62484         
50434323050180010 POWER LOVE ASSOC LOVE REALTY C/O       14,115,315.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1794810      13069         
50434323050180010 POWER LOVE ASSOC LOVE REALTY C/O       14,115,315.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1930 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2854150      19533         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1931 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2924970      32380         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1936 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     471030       4055         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1950 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     266880       2720         
50434323050180050 PALM V ASSOC LTD LOVE REALTY C/O       23,269,303.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1958 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     462950       4556         
50434323050180170 WORTH PONDFIELD WAXMAN MARK C/O       5,682,190.00 0 STORES           1956 2005 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2347190       7592         
50434323050180190 NAPOLEON PALM BEACH        6,614,630.00 0.25 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     563260       2382         
50434323050180190 NAPOLEON PALM BEACH        6,614,630.00 0.25 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1069570       6058         
50434323050180212 MASTERS ROSLYN H & MARJORIE HAUSMAN       2,047,870.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES 1925 1929 00 01 00 1      38950        922        966        790 1925 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     174670       2139         
50434323050180230 MODA IMPORTS INC        15,594,348.00 0 STORES           1950 2000 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1672910      15035         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1920 1990 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME    6276050      80380         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1966 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2257990      24352         
50434323050190010 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        21,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1980 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     101220        709         
50434323050190200 NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF FLA TR        4,383,539.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1931 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1048030       9509         
50434323050190220 LOVE 300        10,925,554.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    3413610      25272         
50434323050200010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 6.97 AIRPORT/MARINA           1970 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      38560        490         
50434323050200010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 6.97 AIRPORT/MARINA           1970 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      97090       2150         
50434323050200020 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,690,298.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1988 05 06 00 2    1668888       5176       5442       5062                 
50434323050200030 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.3759 MUNICIPAL           1922 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2407330      25115         
50434323050200040 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.395 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050210010 SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS        0.00 0 CULTURAL           1925 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1429370      24234         
50434323050210010 SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS        0.00 0 CULTURAL           1948 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     608060       8810         
50434323050210031 EMBASSY CORP        0.00 0 CULTURAL           1922 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2208060      21216         
50434323050210050 SOCIETY OF THE FOUR ARTS INC        0.00 0 CULTURAL                           
50434323050210060 SOCIETY OF FOUR ARTS INC        0.00 0 CULTURAL                           
50434323050210080 SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FL REAL ESTATE SERVICES       0.00 0 PUB CTY SCHOOL                           
50434323050210100 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 1.72 MUNICIPAL           1984 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     704890       9972         
50434323050210100 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 1.72 MUNICIPAL           1993 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      21490        432         
50434323050210151 PEABEY ASSOC        14,000,000.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1969 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4227850     115234         
50434323050210151 PEABEY ASSOC        14,000,000.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1969 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4359190      40624         
50434323050210151 PEABEY ASSOC        14,000,000.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1970 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4463980      40874         
50434323050210171 FJK TEE JAY LTD        5,021,107.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1990 2000 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2671840      12709         
50434323050210172 PHIPPS PLAZA PROPERTY J VOLK C/O       2,028.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050210173 RUMBOUGH MARGARETHA W TR        30,420.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050210180 BROADWAY RPW REV STATUTORY TRUST BROADWAY RPW ADMIN C/O       4,894,920.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1973 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2445010      11576         
50434323050210190 ROYAL COUNTY LLC        13,500,000.00 0.99 FINANCIAL           1925 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2265510      15759         
50434323050210190 ROYAL COUNTY LLC        13,500,000.00 0.99 FINANCIAL           1956 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1057390       7486         
50434323050220220 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL WACHOVIA BANK C/O       15,500,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1925 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     349820       4013         
50434323050220220 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL WACHOVIA BANK C/O       15,500,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1927 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1184950      10478         
50434323050220220 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL WACHOVIA BANK C/O       15,500,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1950 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      36480        714         
50434323050220220 FIRST UNION NATL BANK OF FL WACHOVIA BANK C/O       15,500,000.00 0 FINANCIAL           1978 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     134180        406         
50434323050220272 ROYAL PALM WAY WACHOVIA SECURITY, COMM TAX SER-1873       5,773,666.00 0 FINANCIAL           1986 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3100490      10860         
50434323050220274 ROYAL PALM WAY        2,650,000.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323050230491 WHALOU PROPERTIES II LLC        9,993,780.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1966 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4385040      28548         
50434323050230510 BATMASIAN JAMES H & BATMASIAN MARTA T       7,025,811.00 0 PROF OFFICES           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3813790      12948         
50434323050230520 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       3,544,619.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     327230      16836         
50434323050230530 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 2 LLC &       16,092,842.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF   12875830      46373         
50434323050230541 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       10,293,885.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1962 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6335160      25316         
50434323050230541 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       10,293,885.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1986 1986 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     832110       7462         
50434323050230611 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       2,857,816.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050230612 PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4 LLC PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 6 LLC &       532,800.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY                           
50434323050240421 LAKE TRAIL        927,865.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1970 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME     297040       2662         
50434323050240422 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS INC       0.00 0 ORPHNG/NON-PROF           1949 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1065350      14045         
50434323050240422 REHABILITATION CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS INC       0.00 0 ORPHNG/NON-PROF           1966 1975 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     918350      10250         
50434323050240440 BROADWAY RPW REV STATUTORY TRUST BROADWAY RPW ADMIN C/O       8,893,833.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1960 1985 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2471120      26404         
50434323050240460 SCM ROYAL PALM INVESTORS LLC & ATTN: JONATHAN SATTER       8,081,172.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1974 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    4793330      21632         
50434323050240470 SCM ROYAL PALM INVESTORS LLC & ATTN: JONATHAN SATTER       12,000,000.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1968 2000 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6919210      25776         
50434323050240480 THREE NINETY SIX LTD PRTNRSHP ATTN: REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS       4,452,710.00 0.46 FINANCIAL           1997 1997 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1250010       7870         
50434323050250011 BRADEN JAMES B & BRADEN KIRSTEN W       1,088,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1965 00 02 00 2      45690        590        596        576                 
50434323050250011 BRADEN JAMES B & BRADEN KIRSTEN W       1,088,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 00 02 00 2     144795       1788       1872       1752                 
50434323050250012 KASPER CYNTHIA        834,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1960 00 02 00 1      37548        486        577        273                 
50434323050250012 KASPER CYNTHIA        834,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1990 00 02 01 2     244563       2131       2295       2060                 
50434323050250013 FRANKEL FRANK        2,123,085.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1991 00 04 00 2     533635       3928       4088       3848                 
50434323050250013 FRANKEL FRANK        2,123,085.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 01 00 1      37271        483        686        288                 
50434323050250021 MATTHEWS JACK &        2,684,245.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 05 06 01 2    1106710       4193       4478       3806                 
50434323050250022 MURDOCK LINTON F & NANCY W MURDOCK NANCY W       887,016.00 0.21 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 06 06 01 2    1106710       4193       4478       3806                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1965 00 01 00 2       2887        669        682        664                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1975 00 02 00 2       9830       2408       2458       2332                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1925 1975 01 03 01 2       9266       2043       2072       2030                 
50434323050250030 FLORIDA CAPITAL MGMT LLC        2,524,899.00 0 MFR <10 UNITS 1959 1965 00 02 00 1       2560        744        756        741                 
50434323050250050 215 BRAZILIAN HOLDING LLC        3,000,000.00 0 VACANT COMM                           
50434323050250061 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS        350.00 0.06 VACANT COMM                           
50434323050250071 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS        2,086,525.00 0 STORES           1935 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     372780       4729         
50434323050250072 THIRTY SIXTY SOUTH OCEAN INC        1,826,560.00 0 STORES           1945 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     166200       3630         
50434323050250072 THIRTY SIXTY SOUTH OCEAN INC        1,826,560.00 0 STORES           1945 1960 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     220360       4539         
50434323050250351 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS CAMPANIELLO IMPORTS LTD C/O       3,381,293.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1924 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1130490      16885         
50434323050250352 MILTON PARTNERSHIP LTD LESLIE C FELDMAN C/O       1,283,510.00 0 STORES           1925 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     262710       4700         
50434323050250361 BNB VENTURES PALM BEACH I LLC LEONARD I ACKERMAN C/O       2,070,531.00 0 VACANT COMM           1924 1960 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     109750       7291         
50434323050250370 BROADWAY RPW REV STAT TRUST        5,144,749.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1946 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1941350      12446         
50434323050250380 BESSEMER BUILDING CORP        5,496,917.00 0 PROF OFFICES           1989 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2514340      11694         
50434323050250390 FJK PROP INC        6,534,708.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1957 2007 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    3325640      19242         
50434323050250400 F J K III PROP INC        4,740,951.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1950 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    1535590      10296         
50434323050250411 NHM REALTY LLC        8,289,320.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1975 1980 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF    5011850      23998         
50434323050260081 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       2,650,000.00 0 STORES           1950 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     566660       8464         
50434323050260082 BESSENROTH MARGRIT        1,473,130.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     204030       2616         
50434323050260082 BESSENROTH MARGRIT        1,473,130.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     424880       5586         
50434323050260090 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       2,182,114.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323050260101 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       1,000,000.00 0 FINANCIAL                           
50434323050260102 DORRIS VIVIAN P TRUSTEE DORRIS VIVIAN P TRUST       1,182,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1985 00 03 01 2     164560       5282       6608       3735                 
50434323050260110 ROGER KENT INVESTMENTS INC RUG DOCTON C/O       3,606,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     162504       2502       3124       1932                 
50434323050260110 ROGER KENT INVESTMENTS INC RUG DOCTON C/O       3,606,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 01 2     197906       2957       3008       2839                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      22417        270        338        169                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      62016        768        960        480                 
50434323050260120 AMORY CHARLES M III & AMORY VICTORIA       2,225,828.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 00 03 01 2     471173       4776       5062       4670                 
50434323050260130 BOURNE INVESTMENTS INC        4,306,094.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1995 04 03 01 1    1055141       4681       5189       4082                 
50434323050260140 BAGBY JOSEPH R & MARTHA G BAGBY MARTHA G       804,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1941 02 01 00 1      42891        593        780        546                 
50434323050260140 BAGBY JOSEPH R & MARTHA G BAGBY MARTHA G       804,209.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 04 03 01 2     310367       3728       4233       3144                 
50434323050260151 THREE HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN        2,372,760.00 0 VACANT                           
50434323050260310 ROYAL 160 LLC        14,000,000.00 1.38 MOTEL           1996 2000 0030 01 3 FIRE PROOF    9454140      54038         
50434323050260340 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LTD BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       5,408,512.00 0 FINANCIAL           1971 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2204480      19500         
50434323050260600 ROLAND ASSOC I LTD FELLERS SCHEWE ET AL INC C/O       5,618,613.00 0 OFF MULTISTORY           1984 1990 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    2413010      13846         
50434323050270011 CARALEX REALTY CO LLC        3,466,664.00 0.43 SERV STATIONS           1956 1974 0004 01 2 FIRE RESIS     206820       2248         
50434323050270012 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.5 MUNICIPAL                           
50434323050270141 SKY TRUST TR HILDT DOROTHY TREMAINE       2,418,357.00 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2    1214209       4352       4735       3965                 
50434323050270142 HARRIS DOROTHY W        2,312,829.00 0.17 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 04 01 2    1068255       4100       4504       3710                 
50434323050270280 336 PARTNERS INC        2,051,980.00 0 STORES           1928 1985 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     681980       6252         
50434323050270300 332 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD        1,615,584.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1935 1955 0019 01 1 WOOD FRAME     244030       9402         
50434323050270320 R D OF PALM BEACH INC        3,526,800.00 0 STORE/OFF/RES           1925 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1471800      18796         
50434323050270330 336 PARTNERS INC        3,659,806.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1961 03 04 00 2       9406       2455       2878       2338                 
50434323050270371 REYNOLDS ROBERT L &        3,803,868.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2    1945574       4995       5636       4514                 
50434323050270372 WIGGINS SHARON & WIGGINS WILLIAM B JR       3,182,208.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1371462       4936       5680       4425                 
50434323050270401 GAINES STANLEY N GAINES GAY H       3,235,404.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 04 01 2    1374217       4949       5618       4501                 
50434323050270402 JDO PALM BEACH LLC        3,791,643.00 0.19 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 05 01 2    1930456       4959       5663       4503                 
50434323050280200 BURCH ROBERT L & RED BADGE INC C/O       4,144,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 00 03 01 2    1094614       6180       7178       5327                 
50434323050280211 ANGIULI NICK        841,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 00 03 00 2     163087       1302       1445        968                 
50434323050280211 ANGIULI NICK        841,964.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 00 03 01 3     734779       3722       3722       3722                 
50434323050280212 MCCARTHY THOMAS O        5,526,636.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 2    2171911       7615       8206       6940                 
50434323050280250 PAGLIARI RICHARD A        5,072,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 06 01 2    2169864       6251       7232       5693                 
50434323050280280 PEMS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED BENJAMIN S KENNEDY JR C/O       1,991,750.00 0 STORES                           
50434323050280290 331 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LLC GOLDNER LIDIA       4,585,764.00 0 STORES           1957 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1282490       9676         
50434323050280331 331 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LLC JOEL P KOEPPEL C/O       1,795,241.00 0 FINANCIAL           1959 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     423320       3105         
50434323050280351 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.54 MUNICIPAL           1986 1986 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    3471090      18558         
50434323050280410 BRYANT ELIZABETH        490,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1965 00 04 00 2     136937       2277       2524       2188                 
50434323050280410 BRYANT ELIZABETH        490,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 00 01 00 2      78854       1293       1521        761                 
50434323050280421 HYPERION FARMS MYCFO INC C/O       2,086,985.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1920 1980 04 03 00 1     203841       2813       3270       2504                 
50434323050280440 PIZZAGALLI JAMES C & PIZZAGALLI JUDITH R       3,495,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    1069110       5524       5929       5062                 
50434323050280460 PAMEL GREGORY J & PAMEL JAMES &       1,521,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1970 00 01 00 2      81098       1125       1440        540                 
50434323050280460 PAMEL GREGORY J & PAMEL JAMES &       1,521,540.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 1980 00 01 01 2     168210       2043       2160       1936                 
50434323050280470 INDOE WILLIAM &        3,020,181.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    1120008       4099       4457       3667                 
50434323050280481 CHAMBERS JACK C CHAMBERS INGEBURG R       1,567,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1960 00 01 00 2      54026        658        794        360                 
50434323050280481 CHAMBERS JACK C CHAMBERS INGEBURG R       1,567,842.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1985 03 03 01 2     468934       5002       5465       4376                 
50434323050280510 STONE RICHARD L & LESLEY LESLEY STONE       577,173.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 01 00 2      61357        752        774        720                 
50434323050280510 STONE RICHARD L & LESLEY LESLEY STONE       577,173.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 00 03 00 2     406523       2994       3020       2976                 
50434323050280520 RSDL        1,604,114.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 00 2     126762       2268       2268       2268                 
50434323050280520 RSDL        1,604,114.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 00 03 01 2     209271       2691       3072       2511                 
50434323060000010 ANDRESEN KARL HEINZ & TAURUS INVEST HOLDINGS C/O..L.G KASSOF       10,024,877.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 04 01 2    2590686       7039       7919       6468                 
50434323060000010 ANDRESEN KARL HEINZ & TAURUS INVEST HOLDINGS C/O..L.G KASSOF       10,024,877.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 01 01 2     383307       2297       2928       1980                 
50434323060000021 MCFARLANE CATHLEEN        4,317,018.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 04 04 00 2    1521902       7465       7620       7416                 
50434323060000021 MCFARLANE CATHLEEN        4,317,018.00 0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 00 03 01 1      73129        573        632        436                 
50434323060000040 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,422,467.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1988 00 01 00 1      21932        245        326          1                 
50434323060000040 PRICE MICHAEL F        8,422,467.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1995 04 03 01 3    1362922       4093       4252       3756                 
50434323070000010 HANNON KEVIN S        1,011,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1967   2070    1011150 
50434323070000020 BROD JOHN & BROD LISBETH       850,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1009050 
50434323070000030 GERRITY EDWARD J JR        1,270,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1270500 
50434323070000040 REYNOLDS JANET R TR        1,205,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1205400 
50434323070000050 MERCER DALE T        1,083,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1270500 
50434323070000060 ASTIC JOANNA        310,307.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1009050 
50434323070000070 REMMERT ELIZABETH D ELIZABETH REMMERT TR TITL HLDR       752,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     940800 
50434323070000080 LONG ROBERT E JR        1,029,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1029050 
50434323070000090 LONG ROBERT E JR        1,295,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1295500 
50434323070000100 SNL HOLDINGS LLC        1,230,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1230400 
50434323070000110 ROTH ROSE B        362,766.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1295500 
50434323070000120 REYNOLDS JANET R WILEY R REYNOLDS RESIDUARY TRUST       319,603.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1029050 
50434323070000130 VALENTINE EUGENE M VALENTINE E MASSIE JR &       960,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     960800 
50434323070000140 RUBIN SHIRLEY        1,049,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1049050 
50434323070000150 CROSSMAN CRAIG        1,320,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1320500 
50434323070000160 FINCH MEREDITH K        362,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1255400 
50434323070000170 FINCH MEREDITH K        372,560.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1320500 
50434323070000180 MILLER ANNE C        1,049,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1049050 
50434323070000190 SCHMERTZ HERBERT        930,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1967   1826     980800 
50434323070000200 HALLOCK BERT        338,194.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1069050 
50434323070000210 ELMORE WILLIAM E JR & ELMORE BRENT W       955,866.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1345500 
50434323070000220 WARWICK CHARLES H III & WARWICK ELSIE C       788,874.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1280400 
50434323070000230 MOORE STARR        1,345,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1345500 
50434323070000240 ARMFIELD WILLIAM J IV & JANE H        1,069,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1967   2076    1069050 
50434323070000250 ARMFIELD IV WILLIAM J        1,000,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1967   1826    1000800 
50434323070000260 MANESS CAROLYN J TR        1,657,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1657950 
50434323070000270 FISHMAN IRVING        793,813.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1657950 
50434323070000280 MARSTON HELGA M TRUST MARSTON HELGA TR       1,440,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1440600 
50434323070000290 GAYNOR SUSAN & GAYNOR VERE W       1,234,410.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1967   1809    1440600 
50434323070000300 WARWICK CHARLES H III & WARWICK ELSIE C       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1967    333      89250 
50434323070000310 MOORE STARR        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1967    268      89250 
50434323070000320 MARSTON HELGA M TRUST MARSTON HELGA TR       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1967    317      89250 
50434323070000330 ARMFIELD W J IV & JANE H        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432307 LOWELL HOUSE CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1967    317      89250 
50434323080000010 GUENTHER FREDERICK R TRUST & LIPPINCOTT VIRGINIA G TR       536,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     534450 
50434323080000020 DUSAULT ALLEN J TRUST DUSAULT ELLEN F TR       535,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     534450 
50434323080000030 CURRY JOHN F III &        480,347.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000040 WILLIAMS NANCY J        479,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000050 GILLIGAN VIRGINIA K GILLIGAN VIRGINIA K TR       90,149.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000060 STONEHOUSE ROBERT W        539,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     539450 
50434323080000070 NASTASIC PREDRAG TRUST & NASTASIC VIDOSAVA TRUST       544,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000080 MUNRO ALLISON MUNRO ALLISON TR       90,649.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000090 RUTHERFURD EDWARD C & EDWARD C RUTHERFORD TR TITL HLDR       322,986.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323080000100 CLECKNER ELIZABETH M        322,986.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432308 VILLA DEL SUR CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1968   1317     544450 
50434323100000011 BRADWAY RUBY W        410,218.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1630650 
50434323100000012 CRAIG CHARLES S        933,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1416450 
50434323100000013 LA VOY KENNETH R JR &        1,712,330.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1969   4142    1843800 
50434323100000014 VASILY JOHN M & VASILY MEDINA S       915,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1969   2107     915600 
50434323100000015 HOFFER NATASHA I        438,841.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1969   1104     610050 
50434323100000016 RUTHERFURD ELIZABETH K RUTHERFURD ELIZABETH K TR       792,752.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0016 0400 CONDO 1969   2123     932400 
50434323100000017 MINSKY SYLVIA        384,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1139250 
50434323100000018 BOWDEN ELIZABETH M        1,612,169.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0018 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1788150 
50434323100000019 GERBETH JOHN        301,717.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0019 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1573950 
50434323100000021 MCKENNA PAUL J        923,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1041600 
50434323100000022 FERGUSON JOHN M & EUBANKS WILLIAM R       991,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1969   2097     991200 
50434323100000023 LIST THOMAS & BARBARA LIST BARBARA       185,763.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1058400 
50434323100000024 MARA ANN T        1,265,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1265250 
50434323100000025 POLZIN NANCY DOUGLAS EST        437,290.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1808150 
50434323100000026 MC CLOSKEY MARGERY        766,048.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1593950 
50434323100000027 BURTCH DEAN C & BURTCH CLARE V D       1,005,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0027 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1127750 
50434323100000028 HALPER HARRY A & SYLVIA S SYLVIA S HALPER       297,434.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0028 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1061600 
50434323100000029 OBRIEN TERRENCE P &        896,570.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0029 0400 CONDO 1969   2097    1011200 
50434323100000030 DUDLEY HENRY A &        1,078,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1078400 
50434323100000031 TELL WILLIAM K        1,285,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1285250 
50434323100000032 LYONS J PETER        883,604.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1828150 
50434323100000033 CONDRON P KEVIN & CONDRON CLARE K       1,613,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1613950 
50434323100000034 BAUMAN JAMES J        1,147,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1147750 
50434323100000035 GRAY HORACE A III & GRAY ELIZABETH       1,081,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1081600 
50434323100000036 KELLEY RUSSELL P JR        599,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1969   2097    1031200 
50434323100000037 REVSON MARTIN &        1,646,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0037 0400 CONDO 1969   2123    1646400 
50434323100000038 MUSCARELLE JOSEPH L JR & MUSCARELLE SHARON M       1,305,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0038 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1305250 
50434323100000039 DEEMS RICHARD E & JEAN S        1,848,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0039 0400 CONDO 1969   2810    1848150 
50434323100000040 PANTALONE IRENE        1,531,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   2131    1633950 
50434323100000041 AMOROSO JOAN M TR        1,167,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1969   2071    1167750 
50434323100000042 BALZEKAS STANLEY        1,101,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1969   2107    1101600 
50434323100000043 KOCH JOHN D & KOCH GIULIANA C       1,747,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1969   4220    1923600 
50434323100000045 CRAWFORD WILLIAM W & SANDRA K CRAWFORD SANDRA K       429,836.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1969   2535    1325250 
50434323100000046 HIGGINS JAMES F        3,710,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1969   2870    3710700 
50434323100000047 COLLINS JOHN T        1,958,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0047 0400 CONDO 1969   2243    1958250 
50434323100000048 MADDEN PETER E        1,493,052.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0048 0400 CONDO 1969   1941    1958250 
50434323100000049 SWAN THOMAS J JR & CARROLL D        2,926,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432310 ONE ROYAL PALM WAY CONDO 0049 0400 CONDO 1969   2728    2926350 
50434323110000010 MOULTON ROBERT M & MOULTON DEBORAH A       368,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1970    864     368550 
50434323110000020 CAMPBELL DAWN A        109,786.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000030 GREZELL MARGARITA        178,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1970    481     248850 
50434323110000040 MAXSON KELLI        59,243.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000050 BENTLEY GRETCHEN        278,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1970    643     328650 
50434323110000060 SMITH HILLEN J JR        368,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1970    864     368550 
50434323110000070 SCHOONMAKER ELLA B        352,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1970    864     352800 
50434323110000080 HAAS ROBERTA TR        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000090 NESTORA VERONICA        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000100 HEWITT SARA M        178,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1970    481     233100 
50434323110000110 GURCIULLO ANDREA        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1970    643     312900 
50434323110000120 FORTE PATRICK A        275,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1970    864     352800 
50434323110000130 PRYOR LUIS C & JOANNA J PRYOR JOANNA J       88,215.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1970    864     373550 
50434323110000140 FOX SEYMOUR        333,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000150 BOLAND THOMAS P        253,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1970    481     253850 
50434323110000160 ANGLE RAY A & J CHRISTIAN ANGLE H/W       53,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000170 RICHARDSON GARY C        333,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1970    643     333650 
50434323110000180 MURPHY JAMES J        373,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1970    864     373550 
50434323110000190 KREITSEK WILLIAM A SR & KREITSEK DOLORES       357,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1970    864     357800 
50434323110000200 LESHER JAMES B        317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000210 BISHOP SUSAN        317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000220 BURNS FRANCES C        238,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1970    481     238100 
50434323110000230 WELSH CHARLES N III & YOUNG CARLA W       317,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1970    643     317900 
50434323110000240 HARDING JACQUELINE K        357,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1970    864     357800 
50434323110000250 DONAHUE JAMES B & LINDA P DONAHUE       598,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     594300 
50434323110000260 LANGE GLORIA P LANGE GLORIA P TR       532,980.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     594300 
50434323110000270 BRADLEY WILLIAM W        576,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     573300 
50434323110000280 FRANZKE VOLKER TERRANCE        576,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432311 BRAZILIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1970   1557     573300 
50434323120000012 SHOOR BETTE G        275,683.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1014300 
50434323120000013 EDELMAN RICHARD M        2,400,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2400300 
50434323120000014 FLEISCHER RUTH J FLEISCHER JACK       627,421.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2400300 
50434323120000015 INTERNATIONAL ANTIQUES OF BAHAMAS        1,126,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1126650 
50434323120000017 ALTON HOWARD R JR & ALTON CAMILLA A       911,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1977   1250     911400 
50434323120000021 ETELMAN ETHEL        426,368.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    1961400 
50434323120000022 JAFFE SUSAN O W        1,250,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1250550 
50434323120000023 GRAHAM JOHN K TRUSTEE CROSBY ADVISORS C/O       2,977,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2977800 
50434323120000024 DASILVA WILLARD H & FRANCES A        2,977,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    2977800 
50434323120000025 MILSTEIN RICHARD & JORDAN S RUBOY       1,362,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1362900 
50434323120000026 REMMERT ELIZABETH D REMMERT ELIZABETH D TR       2,285,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2285850 
50434323120000031 CLIFFORD STEWART B TRUST CLIFFORD STEWART B TR       1,986,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    1986400 
50434323120000032 COOLEY DAVID L & CHRISTINE        1,275,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1275550 
50434323120000033 COCOZIELLO SUSAN        3,027,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3027800 
50434323120000034 BAKER JON & BAKER PATRICIA       3,027,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3027800 
50434323120000035 MARTIG JOHN A III        1,387,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1387900 
50434323120000036 HANCOCK WILLIAM G CATHCART MONOMOY REALTY TRUST       2,260,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2310850 
50434323120000041 HIRST NANCY M TRUST HIRST BUSINESS OFFICE C/O       2,011,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2011400 
50434323120000042 MARINO JOSEPHINE        722,070.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1275550 
50434323120000043 SELTZER GLORIA        687,481.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3077800 
50434323120000044 DE LACAM JUDITH DE LACAM ALAIN       2,510,580.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3077800 
50434323120000045 LANASHEL HLDG LTD        1,412,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1412900 
50434323120000046 ROCCA LEONORA W LEONORA W ROCCA TR TI HLDR       514,497.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2335850 
50434323120000051 BIVINS OLIVER W & BIVINS LORNA M       2,073,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2073750 
50434323120000052 GRIFFITH J BRAD GRIFFITH PATRICIA       1,366,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1366050 
50434323120000053 BIRKENFELD RICHARD & BIRKENFELD RUTH       3,200,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3200400 
50434323120000054 ALTON HOWARD R JR & ALTON CAMILLA A       2,587,830.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1977   2406    3200400 
50434323120000055 BERGER E EDITH BERGER E EDITH TR       380,177.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1977   1996    1478400 
50434323120000056 CHIOTELLIS P N & LAVINIA        2,299,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432312 THREE THIRTY SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1977   2454    2299500 
50434323130010021 EIGHTEEN ENTERPRISES INC        3,138,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1982   5000    3138450 
50434323130010022 LEVY JACK & FRANCES W        3,941,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1982   4900    3941700 
50434323130010031 PALM BEACH HOLDINGS LTD        3,188,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1982   5000    3188450 
50434323130010032 DUHL SHIRLEY K DUHL ROGER N       1,707,293.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1982   4900    4466700 
50434323130010041 LACHMAN ROSLYN C        1,544,131.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1982   5000    3238450 
50434323130010042 WOLF ERVING G &        4,893,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1982   4900    4991700 
50434323130020021 GANTZ SARITA        1,132,546.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1982   2900    1963500 
50434323130020022 LONG BARBARA J        663,871.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1982   3000    1860600 
50434323130020023 KATHRYN R ETTENHEIMER RESIDUARY TRUST        826,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1982   3200    2378250 
50434323130020024 FINE ELLEN B TRUST STEPHEN A & ELLEN B FINE TRS       2,303,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1982   3000    2303700 
50434323130020025 RUTTENBERG REID W & RIDC RIVERPLACE       2,040,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1982   2800    2090550 
50434323130020031 BERNICK & CO        2,013,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1982   2900    2013500 
50434323130020032 LEEDS ISABELLE R        1,755,513.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1982   3000    1910600 
50434323130020033 BELFER NORMAN C & ELINOR BELFER ELINOR       844,219.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1982   3200    2428250 
50434323130020034 COHEN RICKY B STUPP        2,353,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1982   3000    2353700 
50434323130020035 GRABEL LORRAINE        1,876,913.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1982   2800    2140550 
50434323130020041 ALBERT RUTH ALBERT RUTH TR       2,013,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1982   2900    2063500 
50434323130020042 SESLOWE JERRY &        1,960,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1982   3000    1960600 
50434323130020043 WINTER FAMILY PARTNERS LP        2,478,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1982   3200    2478250 
50434323130020044 BERNICK HOWARD B        2,403,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1982   3000    2403700 
50434323130020045 MAXWELL GEORGENE M        2,190,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432313 LEVERETT HOUSE CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1982   2800    2190550 
50434323140001010 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A        294,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1010 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140001020 DUPONT WILLIS H        1,004,151.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1020 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140001030 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A        234,176.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 1030 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002010 BAGATELLE COMMERCIAL LLC        600,876.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2010 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002020 METTLER PETER W        466,926.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2020 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002030 PALM BEACH BOARD OF REALTORS INC        391,876.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2030 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002040 DUPONT WILLIS H        756,676.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2040 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002050 PALM BEACH BOARD OF REALTORS INC        1,016,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2050 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323140002060 SANCHEZ & MADDUX INC        826,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432314 PALMA PLAZA CONDO * 2060 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434323150000030 CAMPANIELLO THOMAS CAMPANIELLO IMPORTS LTD C/O       3,448,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432315 PHIPPS PLAZA COND***(RES & *) 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1985      0          1 
50434323150000120 EGLIN EDITH B        473,638.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432315 PHIPPS PLAZA COND***(RES & *) 0120 0400 CONDO 1985   1262     695000 
50434323150000130 HOFFSTOT HENRY P III & HOFFSTOT DARYLN B       592,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432315 PHIPPS PLAZA COND***(RES & *) 0130 0400 CONDO 1985   1114     592000 
50434323150000140 DE HARRIET MARY        162,408.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432315 PHIPPS PLAZA COND***(RES & *) 0140 0400 CONDO 1985   1214     624000 
50434323150000150 SULLIVAN JOHN M JR        652,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432315 PHIPPS PLAZA COND***(RES & *) 0150 0400 CONDO 1985    852     652000 
50434323150000160 EGLIN EDITH B        521,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432315 PHIPPS PLAZA COND***(RES & *) 0160 0400 CONDO 1985    968     521000 
50434323160000011 SHAVELL WADE STOUPAS TERESA       631,676.00 0.0344 OFFICE 1 STORY                           
50434323160000012 177 MAIN STREET LLC        1,405,842.00 0.2525 MFR <10 UNITS 1921 1937 00 02 00 1      25842       2024       2076       1931                 
50434323160000060 GORELICK MARION        584,408.00 0.0574 MFR <10 UNITS 1918 1933 00 03 01 2      87234       2488       2488       2488                 
50434323160000070 DR MAIN STREET LLC MARION GORELICK C/O       575,000.00 0.0574 VACANT                           
50434323160000080 CARTER PHILIP LESLIE &        2,101,380.00 0.1722 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     612927       4550       4931       4098                 
50434323160000110 ANDRASSY LAURA T NORMAN LAURA THERESA TR &       2,041,487.00 0.1722 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     613007       4550       4931       4098                 
50434323250010010 MARKS NANCY L TR        3,835,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3835650 
50434323250010020 ROBINSON ROBERTA N        2,529,740.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3962700 
50434323250010021 FINE MILTON & SHEILA MILTON H/W       2,286,006.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3885650 
50434323250010022 SHAHEEN SHOUKY A & DORIS B        4,012,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    4012700 
50434323250010023 COLIN FRED & COLIN BARBARA       3,830,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3830000 
50434323250010024 BREAKERS COHEN LLC ATTN: CHARLES S COHEN, MANAGER       4,306,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4306700 
50434323250010025 COHEN SUZNNE M 2005 QUALIFIED PERSON TR COHEN ANDREW B TR       3,853,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3853100 
50434323250010030 UTILITIES & INDUSTRIES MGMT CORP        3,780,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3780000 
50434323250010031 GAYNOR JAMES B        2,014,217.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3935650 
50434323250010032 GOLDBERG AVRAM J & CAROL R        4,062,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    4062700 
50434323250010033 NORTHMON INV CO SEYMOUR MILSTEIN C/O       3,880,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3880000 
50434323250010034 BARNETT VICTOR & BARNETT HELAINE       3,951,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4356700 
50434323250010035 TANANBAUM STEVEN A &        3,903,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3903100 
50434323250010040 DANIELS MYRNA L        4,256,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4256700 
50434323250010041 BERNSTEIN HELEN B        3,119,563.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3985650 
50434323250010042 SHAPIRO SAMUEL N TRUST OZOLINS ELIZABETH TR       4,112,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    4112700 
50434323250010043 ZUCKERBERG ROY J & ZUCKERBERG BARBARA       3,930,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3930000 
50434323250010044 NINE 52341 ONTARIO INC DAN J MACRAE CA CFP C/O       4,406,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4406700 
50434323250010045 KATZ STANLEY M & MARILYN L KATZ MARILYN L       2,530,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3953100 
50434323250010050 JENKINS NANCY E NORTHERN TRUST BANK C/O       3,803,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3803100 
50434323250010051 SERCHUCK JEROME QPR TRUST &        4,594,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1986   3465    4594800 
50434323250010052 HASSENFELD SYLVIA K & HASSENFELD ALAN G       4,086,845.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1986   3406    4691400 
50434323250010053 MARDEN BERNARD A & MARDEN CHARLOTTE M       6,073,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1986   4172    6123600 
50434323250010054 BELFER DIANE        3,141,634.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1986   3406    4584300 
50434323250020010 OBERNAUER MARNE & JOAN S OBERNAUER JOAN S       2,014,217.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1986   3234    3760050 
50434323250020020 CURVEY JAMES C & CURVEY SHIRLEY       3,122,886.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3672900 
50434323250020021 FEINBERG DAVID H & FEINBERG CAROL       3,810,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1986   3234    3810050 
50434323250020022 COHEN FEINBERG CAROL R        2,014,217.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3722900 
50434323250020023 COHEN FEINBERG CAROL R        3,763,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3763850 
50434323250020024 BLOCK ELLEN H        3,836,190.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4545050 
50434323250020025 ISENBERG EUGENE M        2,530,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    4062050 
50434323250020030 HARRISON SHELLEY D & HARRISON GILBERT W       3,593,110.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3713850 
50434323250020031 WOOD JAMES &        3,860,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1986   3234    3860050 
50434323250020032 OBERG SUSAN OBERG SUSAN TR       3,606,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3772900 
50434323250020033 GOUSE RICHARD & CHERYL        3,813,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3813850 
50434323250020034 GREEN ALLAN & GREEN HANA       3,887,690.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4595050 
50434323250020035 LAZARUS CHARLES P TRU L1N-036 C/O       4,112,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    4112050 
50434323250020040 MICHAELS SAM        4,495,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4495050 
50434323250020041 FLAMM ELAYNE 2000 REVOCABLE TRUST & SIMSES & ASSOCIATES P A C/O       3,910,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1986   3234    3910050 
50434323250020042 SOMMER BEVERLY SOMMER BEVERLY TR       3,658,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    3822900 
50434323250020043 VALANDO  MARION ELIZABETH        3,863,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1986   2636    3863850 
50434323250020044 BERNSTEIN HAROLD P        2,983,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1986   3328    4645050 
50434323250020045 SHAPIRO CARL & CARL & RUTH SHAPIRO ET AL TR HLDRS       3,793,995.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    4162050 
50434323250020050 MARK MORRIS & MARK SUSAN L       4,012,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1986   3013    4012050 
50434323250020051 EPSTEIN LOUIS        3,251,708.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1986   3465    4609500 
50434323250020052 LAB PROPERTY LTD PARTNRSHP MIDLAND GROUP C/O       4,512,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1986   3406    4512900 
50434323250020053 LANDAU EMILY FISHER BROTHERS C/O       5,703,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1986   4172    5703600 
50434323250020054 FENNELL SHIRLEY TR        4,626,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1986   3406    4626300 
50434323250030010 NINE 52341 ONTARIO INC DAN J MACRAE CA CFP C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030020 JENKINS NANCY E NORTHERN TRUST BANK C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030030 TANANBAUM LISA        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030040 BARNETT VICTOR & CALER DONTEN LEVINE C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030050 DANIELS MYRNA L        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030060 ISENBERG EUGENE M TR        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030070 MARDEN BERNARD A & MARDEN CHARLOTTE M       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030080 FENNELL SHIRLEY TR        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030090 COLIN FRED & COLIN BARBARA       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030100 ALAN HASSENFELD ET AL        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030110 COHEN SUZANNE M        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030120 BERNSTEIN HELEN B        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030130 ZUCKERBERG ROY J & ZUCKERBERG BARBARA       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030140 BERNSTEIN HAROLD P        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030150 FINE MILTON & SHEILA        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030160 FEINBERG CAROL R        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030170 UTILITIES & INDUSTRIES MGMT CORP        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030180 GREEN ALLAN & HANA        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030190 BELFER ARTHUR B & DIANE        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030200 WOOD JAMES &        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030210 MARKS NANCY L        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030220 BLOCK ELLEN H        99,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1986      0      99750 
50434323250030230 VALANDO THOMAS & LIVIA MOLLER C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030240 LAB PROPERTY LTD PARTNRSHP MIDLAND GROUP C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030250 GOUSE RICHARD & CHERYL        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030260 OBERG SUSAN TR        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030270 SHAPIRO SAMUEL N TRUST SHAPIRO DONALD R TR       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030280 CURVEY JAMES C &        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030290 BREAKERS COHEN LLC ATTN: CHARLES S COHEN, MANAGER       99,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1986      0      99750 
50434323250030300 FLAMM ELAYNE TR BANKERS TRUST FL TR       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030310 KATZ STANLEY M & MARILYN L        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030320 SERCHUCK JEROME QPR TRUST &        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0320 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030330 SHAPIRO RUTH E TR & SHAPIRO CARL TR       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0330 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030340 GAYNOR JAMES B & GERALDYNE        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0340 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030350 SOMMER BEVERLY TR        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0350 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030360 EPSTEIN LOUIS        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0360 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030370 LAZARUS CHARLES P CHARLES LAZARUS TRU C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0370 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030380 MILSTEIN CONSTANCE J TR & OGDEN CAP PROP C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0380 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030390 SHAHEEN SHOUKY A & DORIS B        89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0390 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323250030400 LANDAU EMILY FISHER BROTHERS C/O       89,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432325 TWO NORTH BREAKERS ROW CONDO 0400 0400 CONDO 1986      0      89250 
50434323260000000 THREE HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965      0        125 
50434323260001010 CROVO CHARLES R II        1,191,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1191750 
50434323260001020 HAWKWORTH TRUST HOROWITZ ELIZABETH J TR &       1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1001700 
50434323260001030 CARTER JOHN M TRUST        1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1001700 
50434323260001040 DOFFERMYRE MARY BROWN LOW        1,181,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1181250 
50434323260001050 GRZEBIEN JOHN & GRZEBIEN CHARLOTTE       575,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     575400 
50434323260001060 MCGINNESS NEIL        575,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     575400 
50434323260001070 HUSSEY LEO J & HUSSEY SUSAN E       585,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 1G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     585900 
50434323260001080 VAN DURAND ANN        260,872.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607950 
50434323260002010 KINLIN ROBERT & KINLIN ELLEN       1,216,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1216750 
50434323260002020 FOSTER JAMES C & FOSTER AUDREY S       1,802,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2B 0510 CO-OP 1965   3602    1802850 
50434323260002040 MCGINNESS NEIL        361,321.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1206250 
50434323260002050 LEE FRANK W JR & LEE MARY I       597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002060 MORGAN VIRGINIA        597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002070 MULLEN DORAN        597,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 2G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     597450 
50434323260002080 SCHMITZ RENATE        617,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617950 
50434323260003010 COLLINS CAROL O        237,863.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1241750 
50434323260003020 COLLINS CAROL O TR        1,051,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1051700 
50434323260003030 ANDERSON STANTON D        1,001,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1051700 
50434323260003040 GRANT PATRICIA J TRUST &        1,231,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1231250 
50434323260003050 DE MELLO MARIE & JOHN DE MELLO JR       56,265.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003060 ROEMMELE HERBERT A        607,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003070 DRESNER MILTON H        306,844.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     607450 
50434323260003080 SMITH WALTER E JR WALTER E SMITH JR TR TITL HLDR       426,890.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 3H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627950 
50434323260004010 PERIALE MARY E        238,748.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1266750 
50434323260004020 IMPERIAL MOIRA T & GRONBERG TARA I       1,076,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1076700 
50434323260004030 FARIS GEORGE N        1,076,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1076700 
50434323260004040 MORGAN VIRGINIA E        840,436.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1256250 
50434323260004050 RYAN JOHN J & RYAN MARY A       397,020.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004060 MATTIE BETTY J TR        261,372.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004070 GOWDY GERALDINE O        617,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     617450 
50434323260004080 EKSTRACT EILEEN        637,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 4H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     637950 
50434323260005010 MCLENDON JOYCE W        238,748.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5A 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1291750 
50434323260005020 CLARKE ROSALIND        1,051,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5B 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1101700 
50434323260005030 MAHER THOMAS D JR & MAHER YVONNE B       1,101,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5C 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1101700 
50434323260005040 LIGHTHIZER ROBERT E        1,281,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5D 0510 CO-OP 1965   1801    1281250 
50434323260005050 KRENER ROBERT J. TR        627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5E 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005060 PAULINO BEN & PAULINO MARY       627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5F 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005070 LENNON HUGH & JANICE H        627,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5G 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     627450 
50434323260005080 PARKS DOROTHY B        283,774.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP 5H 0510 CO-OP 1965   1367     647950 
50434323260006010 HALL ANDREW J        1,855,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHA 0510 CO-OP 1965   2565    1855350 
50434323260006020 SLATER SUSAN H BISHOP        1,048,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHB 0510 CO-OP 1965   1466    1048950 
50434323260006030 WALSH MICHAEL & WALSH HELEN       1,464,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1965   2093    1514100 
50434323260006040 HALL ANDREW &        990,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHD 0510 CO-OP 1965   2093     990150 
50434323260006050 POWELL SARA D        277,511.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432326 THREE HUNDRED S OCEAN CO-OP PHE 0510 CO-OP 1965   2093    1003800 
50434323270000010 MERRILL ARTHUR C JR        624,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432327 BERMUDA HOUSE CONDO A 0400 CONDO 1999   1047     624750 
50434323270000020 PLUM JUDE GERARD        550,600.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432327 BERMUDA HOUSE CONDO B 0400 CONDO 1999    968     600600 
50434323270000030 GABLER JAMES M & GABLER ANITA N       574,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432327 BERMUDA HOUSE CONDO C 0400 CONDO 1999   1047     624750 
50434323270000040 CLOUD VINCENT T        442,820.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432327 BERMUDA HOUSE CONDO D 0400 CONDO 1999    798     570150 
50434323270000050 CLARK HOWARD L & CLARK KAREN K       636,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432327 BERMUDA HOUSE CONDO  0400 CONDO 1999    968     636300 
50434326000010010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.03 MUNICIPAL                           
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1957 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2197240      23136         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1963 1963 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     103630       3131         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1964 1964 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     137580       3692         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1972 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     219500       3395         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1989 1989 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     294240       3813         
50434326000010020 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        9,052,387.00 82.18 GOLF COURSE 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     168764       1942       2091       1626 1995 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     104400       2016         
50434326000010040 EXTOR E & MARY J        882,381.00 0.09 MFR <10 UNITS           1930 1955 0006 01 1 WOOD FRAME      70860       2656         
50434326000010050 EXTOR MARY J        367,687.00 0.07 MFR <10 UNITS 1930 1930 00 02 00 2      64535       1563       1651       1434                 
50434326000010070 CH VILLAS LLC &        400,000.00 0.19 MOTEL                           
50434326000010080 COLONY HOTEL INC        7,000,000.00 1.05 MOTEL           1947 1990 0083 01 2 FIRE RESIS    6020220      64592         
50434326000010080 COLONY HOTEL INC        7,000,000.00 1.05 MOTEL           1994 1994 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     770550       7146         
50434326000010130 CH VILLAS LLC &        3,284,471.00 1.39 MOTEL           1922 1985 0007 01 1 WOOD FRAME     630910      13195         
50434326000010160 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL                           
50434326000010170 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1981 1981 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      67040       1020         
50434326000020020 MYERS STEPHEN E MYERS STEPHEN E TR       17,396,464.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 09 10 01 2    6268846      18253      22474      15362                 
50434326000020030 KREHBIEL F A II & KATHLEEN K        9,894,472.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 08 01 2    4699075      12594      15127      11298                 
50434326000020040 COHEN JACQUES & COHEN FRANCOISE       1,662,777.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 00 01 00 1      63049        748        894        408                 
50434326000020040 COHEN JACQUES & COHEN FRANCOISE       1,662,777.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1995 03 04 00 3     659455       5178       5614       4899                 
50434326000020050 EL VEDADO LLC        17,814,973.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 04 07 05 2    5607740      14044      16405      12913                 
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 01 02 00 1       5248        816        816        816                 
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1955 05 06 01 2      65239       7893       8670       6000                 
50434326000020060 BELGARDE BRAD        7,565,802.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1974 01 01 00 1       6016       1674       2388       1368                 
50434326000020070 SHALEK BERDONNA WEINGARTEN BERDONNA WEINGARTEN SHALEK TR TITL HLDR       2,318,810.00 0.69 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 04 06 01 2    1716838       5802       6602       5100                 
50434326000020080 SCHUSTER GERALD        11,328,193.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2000 05 08 00 2    2562986      11752      12614      10033                 
50434326000020090 FANJUL JOSE F & EMILIA M FANJUL EMILIA M       3,136,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 07 01 3    2107389      10619      12398       8456                 
50434326000020090 FANJUL JOSE F & EMILIA M FANJUL EMILIA M       3,136,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1957 01 01 00 1      29700        384        384        384                 
50434326000020110 TRUMP IVANA        8,065,839.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 07 01 2    2099615      14192      18316      12352                 
50434326000020120 SILVER LADY MANAGEMENT LLC        10,355,559.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 2005 05 07 01 3    3925552      12881      14548      11365                 
50434326000020130 ABONY LORNE KOEPPEL LAW GROUP PL C/O       5,451,697.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 2000 04 06 01 2     821878       6840       7407       6426                 
50434326000020150 VLAHOS DEAN & VLAHOS MICHELLE       8,642,637.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 2000 05 08 01 3    2298173      10492      11729       9714                 
50434326000020160 BANYAN VENTURE        5,297,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1970 04 06 01 3     683107       6246       6913       5595                 
50434326000020170 DOGWOOD LAND CO LLC        8,512,878.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326000020180 BERMAN MARTIN L        4,620,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 05 07 01 2     233811      11162      13303       9653                 
50434326000020190 CHARLES S ROBERT FUND OAR LLC CHARLES S ROBERT FUND PP LP       15,671,263.00 1.95 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 03 03 01 3      15397       3355       4061       2453                 
50434326000020190 CHARLES S ROBERT FUND OAR LLC CHARLES S ROBERT FUND PP LP       15,671,263.00 1.95 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 05 09 01 3     129063      15459      17292      14676                 
50434326000020200 BARDES MERRILYN BARDES MERRILYN TR       6,368,930.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 08 01 3    2178502      11134      13077       7157                 
50434326000020210 TRUE 680 MR. MARK FREITAS C/O       8,203,687.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 07 08 02 2    3550817      12406      13093      11497                 
50434326000020220 CLOUD MARJORIE E        872,099.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1960 05 03 01 2     357921       4271       4548       4008                 
50434326000020230 SCHWARTZ GERALD W        7,533,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1998 05 06 01 1    1036939       8630      10405       7654                 
50434326000020230 SCHWARTZ GERALD W        7,533,213.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1998 02 03 00 1     140443       1640       1640       1640                 
50434326000020240 MOODY WILLIAM F & LANDRY DANA E       5,828,935.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1986 05 05 00 2    1209264       6959       7091       6651                 
50434326000020250 VAN SCHAICK D L        5,348,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 01 01 00 1      78058       1012       1246        528                 
50434326000020250 VAN SCHAICK D L        5,348,885.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 04 04 01 2    1127633       5620       5870       5558                 
50434326000020260 ALLEN JOSEPH        5,392,089.00 0.58 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 01 2    2348149       7354       8524       6467                 
50434326000020270 DIXON F EUGENE JR        16,924,391.00 1.5708 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 07 01 2    8172775      13102      15038      11862                 
50434326000020280 SPROCK H MARTIN III        6,264,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1995 05 06 01 2     518806       5326       5471       4988                 
50434326000020280 SPROCK H MARTIN III        6,264,079.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 01 01 00 1      76538        737        737        737                 
50434326000020290 SAMSON PB LLC        6,037,500.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326000020300 SLIFKA ALFRED        6,764,068.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 03 2    3030674       7412       8787       6197                 
50434326000020310 KAHN GILBERT S &        7,852,050.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 04 02 2    2525299       8790      10447       7956                 
50434326000020320 BOCKMANN MARIA K        6,980,501.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 08 00 2    1942129       7721       8164       7194                 
50434326000020330 NORRIS PATRICIA G NORRIS SANDRA L       929,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1950 01 02 00 1      69508        816        976        460                 
50434326000020330 NORRIS PATRICIA G NORRIS SANDRA L       929,168.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 03 03 01 2     386296       3734       3846       3660                 
50434326000020340 HANLEY WILLIAM L JR HANLEY ALICE H       3,533,671.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 02 02 00 2     173521       1773       2035       1160                 
50434326000020340 HANLEY WILLIAM L JR HANLEY ALICE H       3,533,671.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 04 04 01 2    1464952       6626       7685       5919                 
50434326000020350 MILLER FRANK A        2,023,299.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1990 04 04 01 3    1746500       6200       6874       5521                 
50434326000020360 LOW K PRESCOTT &        4,214,074.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1990 04 05 00 2    1571895       6460       7912       5580                 
50434326000020370 RAMSING THOR H        1,602,882.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1950 04 03 01 1     309160       4025       4111       3823                 
50434326000020380 RATHBORNE CAROL SIMMONS        3,781,121.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 2000 05 05 01 2    1896622       6874       7581       6308                 
50434326000020390 MCATEE JOHN J JR &        3,108,155.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 2000 04 04 01 2    1346731       5784       6149       5242                 
50434326000020400 BALLINGER WYNNE S TRUST        2,914,601.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1975 02 01 00 1     139995       1869       2200       1100                 
50434326000020400 BALLINGER WYNNE S TRUST        2,914,601.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 05 06 00 3    1437900       6243       6603       6171                 
50434326000020410 BELL LOWRY M JR & DIANA M BELL DIANA M       4,085,183.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1985 05 06 00 2    2115564       7655       8574       6259                 
50434326000020420 KOZLOFF PAUL J KOZLOFF PAUL J TR       5,742,956.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 06 01 2    2433603       8413      10006       7055                 
50434326000020430 ROUSSEAU LILLIAN ROUSSEAU LILLIAN M TR       3,099,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1947 00 02 00 2      78546       1260       1260       1260                 
50434326000020430 ROUSSEAU LILLIAN ROUSSEAU LILLIAN M TR       3,099,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1983 05 07 01 2    1450585       7328       7770       6973                 
50434326000020450 TOLL BRUCE E &        14,607,561.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 00 00 2    3989267      12064      15630      10982                 
50434326000020450 TOLL BRUCE E &        14,607,561.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 01 00 2     242385       1673       2071        964                 
50434326000020460 DIAMOND JANICE        10,386,841.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 02 00 2     188576       1394       1747        852                 
50434326000020460 DIAMOND JANICE        10,386,841.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 12 05 01 2    2990223       8341      11594       6807                 
50434326000020480 CURTIS ALAN & CHRISTINE W CURTIS CHRISTINE W       6,235,326.00 1.46 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 05 08 01 3    3728064      11333      13730      10014                 
50434326000020500 LUMSDEN GARY R        1,830,507.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1980 03 03 00 2     286575       3349       3828       2600                 
50434326000020510 PETRIE CARROLL        6,515,925.00 0.81 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1992 05 06 01 2    1904616       6429       6681       6146                 
50434326000020520 ENGELSTEIN ALEC &        8,134,605.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 2000 00 08 00 2    2237557      10449      11815       9025                 
50434326000020530 CONDREN WILLIAM J        4,832,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 05 01 2    3100039      10221      11365       9166                 
50434326000020540 DUNN WILLIAM A        7,781,777.00 0.6546 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 05 08 01 2    3530475      10402      12623       8811                 
50434326000020550 CANTOR IRIS CANTOR IRIS TR       9,257,637.00 0.91 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 08 00 2    2425743       9091      10808       8004                 
50434326010020011 BCD INVESTORS LLP        3,893,739.00 0.84 RESTAURANT           1928 1985 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     865520       8967         
50434326010020012 SIRENITY INVESTORS LTD        1,259,584.00 0 MULTIFAMILY           1940 1985 0011 01 2 FIRE RESIS     379290       7680         
50434326010020051 SLOANE A RICHARD SLOANE CAROLYN J       2,858,909.00 0.14 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    1909670       4708       5595       4256                 
50434326010020052 CUMMINGS-KARP HELENE        2,776,874.00 0.1686 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    2197963       5455       6121       4967                 
50434326010020061 LIGGETT ROBERT G JR TRUST ROBERT G LIGGETT TR       2,660,462.00 0.17 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 00 3    1705671       5464       6321       4822                 
50434326010020070 BCD INVESTORS LLP        2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326010030010 470 SOUTH OCEAN LLC        2,990,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326020000010 DRAIME CECILE M DRAIME DAVID M TR       4,993,391.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 04 05 01 2    2712269       4903       5320       4395                 
50434326020000020 JAMES DANIEL H & SYLVIA JAMES SYLVIA       782,725.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 04 05 01 2     425412       4149       4838       2985                 
50434326020000031 CINQUE GAY ANN & CINQUE ALFRED J       776,989.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1954 01 01 00 1      68297       1166       1320       1128                 
50434326020000031 CINQUE GAY ANN & CINQUE ALFRED J       776,989.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1990 03 04 00 2     310924       2928       3219       2670                 
50434326020000040 ANTONINI PENELOPE F & ANTONINI MARION H       2,961,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1955 00 01 00 1      20453        258        289        245                 
50434326020000040 ANTONINI PENELOPE F & ANTONINI MARION H       2,961,002.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 00 03 01 3     891071       4286       4480       3808                 
50434326020000050 VANDERPOEL BARRIE OSBORN VANDERPOEL BARRIE OSBORN TR       4,248,768.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 06 09 01 2    1774583      10481      10772      10044                 
50434326020000070 GEYER ELLEN        1,728,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1960 04 05 01 3    1078537       6592       6908       6225                 
50434326020000091 GOLFVIEW HOLDINGS LLC        2,331,638.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 05 01 2     918796       5441       5737       4961                 
50434326020000092 JAMES WILLIAM E & WILLIAM E JAMES TR TITL HLDR       3,483,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1980 01 02 00 1      60514        550        550        550                 
50434326020000092 JAMES WILLIAM E & WILLIAM E JAMES TR TITL HLDR       3,483,755.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 04 05 00 2    1716016       5191       5825       4505                 
50434326020000110 WHELTON JOHN C & MAHNAZ WHELTON MAHNAZ       1,892,720.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1970 05 07 00 2    2084961       8311       9109       7594                 
50434326020000121 BAILEY IRVING W II        5,789,769.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 04 05 01 2    4713431       7932       8674       7422                 
50434326020000141 GRAEBNER CLARK E & GRAEBNER PATRICIA       3,604,957.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1986 04 06 01 2    2064544       5601       6057       5511                 
50434326020000142 BUTLER FRANK O II        1,442,112.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 3    1200354       6643       7066       5654                 
50434326020000160 EVERGLADES CLUB INC        25,140.00 0 GOLF COURSE                           
50434326020000170 BENT BRUCE D BENT BRUCE D TR       2,023,930.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 1    1679498       9222      10236       8477                 
50434326020000180 GILMOUR DAVID H & DAVID H GILMOUR TR HLDR       4,504,042.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 05 06 01 2    3164010       7296       7539       6862                 
50434326020000190 KELLY MICHAEL TR & KELLY EDWARD J JR TR       4,554,585.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 2000 04 04 01 2    1079771       4600       4959       3931                 
50434326030000011 KAHN PATRICIA A        2,320,169.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1945 04 04 01 2      17235       5478       6097       4705                 
50434326030000012 RADTKE JANINA TRUST        6,354,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1995 03 03 01 1     715432       3377       4227       2823                 
50434326030000030 LEVY MARK & LEVY JANET       9,755,093.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 04 06 01 2    3061340       9677      11418       8532                 
50434326030000040 FELDMAN ROBERT M & FELDMAN AMY       7,426,125.00 0.52 VACANT                           
50434326030000050 MCCARTHY R HARRISON        5,630,740.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 07 01 2    2822670       8613      11104       7544                 
50434326030000060 STRYKER JON 1976 TRUST STRYKER JON TR       7,426,125.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1990 05 09 01 2    2218667      12166      14568      10878                 
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 01 02 00 1      35548        348        699          1                 
50434326030000070 BUFFETT JAMES W & JANE S BUFFETT JANE S       6,159,501.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 02 00 1     138972       1125       1630        664                 
50434326030000091 ANDREWS CAROLYN P        2,820,166.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 06 01 3    1456106       8522       9508       7376                 
50434326030000092 NESBITT GERALDINE T TR        4,404,997.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 07 01 3     946140       9457      11034       8005                 
50434326030000100 PATTERSON JAMES A        11,029,102.00 1.3792 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 03 00 2     257838       1774       2452        841                 
50434326030000100 PATTERSON JAMES A        11,029,102.00 1.3792 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 06 01 2    3855797      13978      16762      12217                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1995 00 02 00 1     118564        996       1260        600                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1995 00 03 01 2    1918291       5798       6117       5157                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 01 01 01 2     115142        913       1106        529                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 05 08 01 2    3377769      10893      11733       9939                 
50434326030000120 KLUGE JOHN W COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY       23,056,099.00 4.0725 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 02 00 1     129360       1219       1320        984                 
50434326030000240 STRYKER JON TR        5,678,826.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 06 01 2    2082507       7002       7779       6626                 
50434326030000240 STRYKER JON TR        5,678,826.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 02 01 00 1     121104       1314       1722        710                 
50434326030000270 DOMMERICH LOUIS A & JANE M DOMMERICH JANE M       862,195.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 01 01 00 1      59734        652        652        652                 
50434326030000270 DOMMERICH LOUIS A & JANE M DOMMERICH JANE M       862,195.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1980 03 05 00 2     315437       3343       3494       3093                 
50434326030000290 PRESTON JOHN & PRESTON MONIKA       8,050,971.00 0.777 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1993 05 07 01 2    4631533       9766      10872       9065                 
50434326030000330 FOSTER JANE D        1,746,772.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 03 03 01 2     475160       4295       4598       3878                 
50434326030000350 GLAZER AVRAM & GLAZER JILL       7,732,016.00 0.89 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 2000 05 08 00 2    2719987      12138      14001      11074                 
50434326030000360 WOOD ROBERT K        794,320.00 0.38 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1965 04 05 00 2     505643       4268       4426       3655                 
50434326030000400 GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E TRUST GIANGRANDE JEFFRY E TR       2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326030000411 GARRICK C STEPHENSON GULFSTREAM GUSTAFSON EDWIN JR TR       2,300,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434326030000430 STEPHENSON CLAIRE M GULFSTREAM ROAD TRUS GUSTAFSON EDWIN JR TR       2,934,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 03 03 01 2     629229       3017       3620       2551                 
50434326030000441 MAY ROBERT P MAY MARILYN R       3,300,378.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 2001 03 03 01 2    1609748       7024       8384       5925                 
50434326030000460 DAVIS MARK & DAVIS NANCY       2,773,441.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1970 03 04 00 2     440319       3962       4269       2916                 
50434326030000470 CHASE FLORENCE M        3,531,206.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 03 03 01 2     446669       4323       4589       3915                 
50434326030000470 CHASE FLORENCE M        3,531,206.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 02 02 00 1      91005       1222       1222       1222                 
50434326030000510 M R R HOLDING CORP        6,337,201.00 0.5401 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1955 00 01 00 1      21554        332        499        250                 
50434326030000510 M R R HOLDING CORP        6,337,201.00 0.5401 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 04 07 01 2    1127470       6710       7113       6441                 
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1956 01 02 00 2      82332       1056       1075       1012                 
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1970 03 04 01 2     835646       3788       4130       3696                 
50434326030000521 PARTRICH SPENCER M PARTRICH MYRNA       4,508,855.00 0.4383 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 01 00 1     107937        995       1770        348                 
50434326030000541 LAWRENCE R C JR        3,027,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 03 01 2     714317       4158       4410       3761                 
50434326030000560 ALLEN JOAN Z ALLEN JOAN Z TR       2,338,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1975 03 04 00 1      82543       4259       4678       3113                 
50434326030000580 PIZZA JOSEPH M &        4,001,219.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 05 01 2    1712455       5206       5427       4860                 
50434326030000600 WALLAU ALEX L WALLAU ALEX L TR       1,695,499.00 0.43 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1985 00 06 01 2    1173178       6696       7653       5577                 
50434326030000621 NAEGELE JENNIFER J        4,853,595.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 05 06 01 3    2546090       8782      10045       8088                 
50434326030000650 DRYER JOSEPH F JR &        1,466,082.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 05 08 00 2    1033572       7612       8660       7008                 
50434326030000671 MASHEK JOHN D JR        1,275,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 03 03 01 2     946034       4455       4646       4026                 
50434326030000750 ORTIZ PATINO UTA K        2,825,425.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1993 04 04 01 2    1378842       5695       6284       5609                 
50434326030000761 IRVINE HORACE H II &        3,114,431.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 04 01 2    1059706       4973       5348       4570                 
50434326030000771 SOTER WILLIAM J & SARAH R SOTER SARAH R       1,113,709.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 04 05 01 2    1198869       5811       7970       4660                 
50434326030000791 GLAZER JOEL M & TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS C/O       7,420,861.00 0.938 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 00 05 01 1      46271        360        360        360                 
50434326030000791 GLAZER JOEL M & TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS C/O       7,420,861.00 0.938 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1996 05 07 00 2    1293137       6234       7136       5764                 
50434326030000821 DAIGH GLORIA M        2,894,521.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 03 03 01 1     346333       4043       4601       3555                 
50434326030000831 MANN GEORGE S TR        2,735,766.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1992 02 03 01 2     870754       4056       4466       3378                 
50434326030000860 FRANK RAMSEY & FRANK SUZANNE       3,373,063.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1980 01 01 00 1      41558        381        381        381                 
50434326030000860 FRANK RAMSEY & FRANK SUZANNE       3,373,063.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1948 1990 03 03 01 2    1023526       4635       5180       4136                 
50434326030000870 CENTRAL AVENUE INVESTMENTS LLC JASON P THEIN C/O THOMPSON COBURN       4,937,455.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 06 00 2    2003877       5830       6654       5253                 
50434326040000020 HARRISON MAI V        5,633,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 05 06 01 2    1483620       7502       8165       6845                 
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1947 04 04 01 2      32516       5146       5388       5234                 
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 02 02 01 2       4620       1965       2312       1156                 
50434326040000030 770 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD LP        19,276,839.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 02 02 00 1       6365       1733       2032       1632                 
50434326050000030 LINDSAY CHARLES J & LINDSAY FERN M       2,395,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1970   3883    2445450 
50434326050001180 KELLER FRED TR        1,942,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1180 0400 CONDO 1970   3218    1942500 
50434326050001200 KUDMAN IRWIN        263,865.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1139250 
50434326050001210 LEED PAULA        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     912450 
50434326050001220 LEED PAULA B        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 1220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     912450 
50434326050002180 KITTREDGE EDWARD        1,163,564.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1970   3216    1916250 
50434326050002200 SILBERSTEIN RUTH        1,149,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1149250 
50434326050002210 THOMAS MARION S TRUST        917,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     917450 
50434326050002220 FIORITA VAL & MALINDA        917,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     917450 
50434326050003010 NECO LUIS M & F RUTH NECO F RUTH       147,401.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624     937650 
50434326050003020 FITERMAN DE LORIS J        1,050,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1050000 
50434326050003030 FRIEDMAN RAYMOND WINTHROP HOUSE C/O       311,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1970   2375    1352400 
50434326050003040 GINN FLORENCE L        686,914.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1025850 
50434326050003050 HERRICK L ALLAN &        1,093,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1970   1669    1093050 
50434326050003060 MILLER STEPHEN C & MILLER BARBARA G       193,345.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1054200 
50434326050003070 CARDO RANDY & CARDO BEVERLY       1,054,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1054200 
50434326050003080 STRAUSS CAROL K & STRAUSS PETER       1,346,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1346100 
50434326050003090 FIG TREE II PARTNERS CHARLES RYAN HICKMAN C/O       2,507,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2507400 
50434326050003100 MARCANTONIO MARY M        1,504,270.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1660050 
50434326050003110 BLONDER DOROTHY ALTSCHUL KAREN B TR       326,292.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1970   2137    1377600 
50434326050003120 PAGE MICHAEL F &        654,199.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2202900 
50434326050003140 GARVEY JOHN K TRUST GARVEY JOHN K TRUSTEE       1,660,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1660050 
50434326050003150 THREE 15 WORTH INC J KERZNER C/O       1,377,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1970   2137    1377600 
50434326050003160 MANNING JOHN P        1,842,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1842750 
50434326050003170 EPSTEIN ROBERT TR & STEDMAN BARBARA S TR       1,397,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1397550 
50434326050003180 DAVID E MORGAN INC        1,058,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3180 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1058400 
50434326050003190 SCHOENFELD LORI &        1,058,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3190 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1058400 
50434326050003200 JONES DAVID L &        158,435.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1159250 
50434326050003210 ONEIL ALTON J        345,971.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 3210 0400 CONDO 1970   3159    1659000 
50434326050004010 BENDERMAN MAYA        529,607.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624     942650 
50434326050004020 VIGILANTE ANTOINETTE &        140,784.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1065000 
50434326050004030 ROTTMAN JOY ANN & MILTON & JOY ANN ROTTMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       425,323.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1452150 
50434326050004040 GAYNIN JONATHAN S        1,040,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1040850 
50434326050004050 INDUSTRIAL AMERICA INC  MICHAEL F PAGE C/O       1,452,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1452150 
50434326050004060 KARTIGANER NORMAN & PATRICIA KARTIGANER PATRICIA       197,759.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1069200 
50434326050004070 SCHWARTZ MILTON        1,069,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1069200 
50434326050004080 PAGE MICHAEL F & JOAN R        1,366,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1366100 
50434326050004090 ADAMS PHYLLIS S EST MARK W GROTE C/O       2,532,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2532400 
50434326050004100 MOSS BERENICE & MOSS MAGGI &       381,524.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1685050 
50434326050004110 CHANDLER JOSEPH        232,769.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004120 OMALLEY THOMAS D & OMALLEY MARY A       2,227,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2227900 
50434326050004130 CHESHIRE M BRENNAN        253,224.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004140 PAGE JOAN R V TR        1,685,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1685050 
50434326050004150 CALYPSO LLC        1,256,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1256850 
50434326050004160 FISCHER CLIFFORD R & FISCHER GAIL C       1,867,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1867750 
50434326050004170 PHILPIT MARY PHILPIT JOHN R TR       355,811.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1417550 
50434326050004180 KLEEMAN CAROLA J WACHOVIA BANK-ATTN B GARCIA C/O       1,068,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1068400 
50434326050004190 MYERS BERNARD IAN & SANDRA HAN SPECIAL SERVICES DEPT C/O       1,068,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1970   1608    1068400 
50434326050004200 EVANS LAURA W        1,119,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1970   1717    1169250 
50434326050004210 CABARLE CORNELIUS & DOROTHY E CABARLE DOROTHY E       153,858.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     927450 
50434326050004220 SERETEAN SHERRY S        629,903.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1970   1580     927450 
50434326050005010 STONEMAN JAMES M MORRISSEY ROBERT J       1,235,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1235850 
50434326050005020 CALDER MADELEINE J        511,143.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1080000 
50434326050005030 BURNS INGRID BURNS INGRID TR       425,091.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1462150 
50434326050005040 GENTILE FRANK A &        1,055,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1055850 
50434326050005050 MILLER HENRY & MILLER BARBARA       1,462,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1462150 
50434326050005060 STAVARIDIS FLORIDA REALTY TRUST STAVARIDIS PATRICIA A TR       1,084,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1084200 
50434326050005070 HIGGINS PATRICIA P        211,707.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1084200 
50434326050005080 QUINN DENICE D        781,878.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1386100 
50434326050005090 PAGE LUCILLE C PAGE LUCILLE C TR       2,255,140.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2557400 
50434326050005100 HIRSCH CAROLINE P        1,710,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1710050 
50434326050005110 FISHER JOHN & GOTTESMAN MERRILL F       238,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005120 MURRAY MAUREEN        2,252,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2252900 
50434326050005130 KOPLIK SALLY J TR        318,148.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005140 SONNIER JOSEPH A        1,133,116.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1710050 
50434326050005150 FIFTH AVENUE REALTY TRUST        1,266,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1266850 
50434326050005160 BENEVENTO FRANK A II        297,795.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1892750 
50434326050005170 SANFORD BRUCE W & SANFORD MARILOU K       1,437,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1437550 
50434326050006010 WOOD WILLIAM B WILLIAM B WOOD TRUST       484,261.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1250850 
50434326050006020 BASS KIM DEBRA TR & BASS RICHARD C TR       1,045,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1095000 
50434326050006030 MASTERMAN EDWARD I & MASTERMAN SYDELL       1,472,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1472150 
50434326050006040 REDMON HERBERT J JR        1,070,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1070850 
50434326050006050 KAPLAN DOLORES K        1,472,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1472150 
50434326050006060 MOYNIHAN ROBERT E & KATHERINE        1,099,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1099200 
50434326050006070 COLE BARBARA H COLE BARBARA H TR       206,582.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1099200 
50434326050006080 PETROLEUM INC        1,406,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1406100 
50434326050006090 KAPLAN DOLORES K        2,582,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2582400 
50434326050006100 LYONS KAY G        1,735,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1735050 
50434326050006110 WISE ROBERT E & WISE YVONNE B       726,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006120 LAURANS SCOTT B        1,982,190.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2277900 
50434326050006130 STEELE JEAN        242,334.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6130 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006140 GRUDOVICH THOMAS & GRUDOVICH LINDA J       1,735,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1735050 
50434326050006150 PRUDDEN HORTON JR        1,276,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1276850 
50434326050006160 GRUDOVICH THOMAS & GRUDOVICH LINDA J       1,917,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1917750 
50434326050006170 WILNER ZELDA D        1,457,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1457550 
50434326050007010 PETROLEUM INC        1,265,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1265850 
50434326050007020 ZMIJEWSKI LEONARD &        1,110,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1110000 
50434326050007030 DE BORCHGRAVE A & ALEXANDRA V        1,482,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1482150 
50434326050007040 CASTELO JOSEPH & CASTELO DONNA       1,853,650.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1970   3078    1903650 
50434326050007050 MURDOCK PATRICIA K        425,591.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1970   3078    1903650 
50434326050007070 FLUSFEDER JOSEPH        1,114,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1114200 
50434326050007080 VICTORIA DE LILLE INC        1,426,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1970   1602    1426100 
50434326050007090 SLATER SHIRLEY        2,306,640.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1970   2128    2607400 
50434326050007100 GLAZER CAROL J TRUST OF 1998 & GLAZER CAROL J TR       2,988,300.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1970   3595    2988300 
50434326050007110 KARLYN WILLIAM M & KARLYN ELIZABETH M       1,286,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1286850 
50434326050007130 ANDERSON DALE        1,240,543.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7130 0400 CONDO 1970   3180    2053800 
50434326050007140 GABELLI MARIO        1,760,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7140 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1760050 
50434326050007150 DOCTER ALAN K DOCTER MARCIA       1,286,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7150 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1286850 
50434326050007160 GABELLI MARIO & PITARO REGINA       1,942,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7160 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1942750 
50434326050007170 FRIEDHEIM EDITH H WINTHROP HOUSE C/O       1,477,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7170 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1477550 
50434326050007180 COYLE MARILYN & KAZEMINEY NASSER       1,298,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7180 0400 CONDO 1970   1624    1298850 
50434326050007190 SELECMAN BARBARA A BARBARA A SELECMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       483,837.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7190 0400 CONDO 1970   1588    1144500 
50434326050007200 STANVALE PROP LTD LEON UNTERHALTER ASSOCS C/O       1,504,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7200 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1504650 
50434326050007210 BRONSTIEN EDWARD L JR        1,120,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7210 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1120350 
50434326050007220 DOZOR SHIRLEY W DOZOR SHIRLEY W TR       406,873.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7220 0400 CONDO 1970   2022    1504650 
50434326050007230 JANSSEN EILEEN F REVOCABLE TRUST JANSSEN EILEEN F TRUSTEE       1,148,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7230 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1148700 
50434326050007240 WELLS RICHARD E & GLORIA D        1,148,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7240 0400 CONDO 1970   1539    1148700 
50434326050007260 SHARF JEAN S TR & LEON UNTERHALTER ASSOCS C/O       3,033,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7260 0400 CONDO 1970   3730    3033450 
50434326050007270 MCCREADY RICHARD E        1,220,109.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7270 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1817550 
50434326050007280 FRIEDLAND MELVIN        1,309,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7280 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1309350 
50434326050007290 WARSHAW HOWARD & MIRIAM        2,412,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7290 0400 CONDO 1970   1998    2412900 
50434326050007310 CORNSTEIN SHEILA        1,817,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7310 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    1817550 
50434326050007320 FRANKS STANLEY & FRANKS CHRISTINE A       684,749.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7320 0400 CONDO 1970   1590    1309350 
50434326050007330 DE BARDELEBEN PRINCE JR & ANNE        2,000,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7330 0400 CONDO 1970   1597    2000250 
50434326050007340 BLOYS DAVID & BLOYS SENIE       1,444,530.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432605 WINTHROP HOUSE CONDO 7340 0400 CONDO 1970   1580    1523550 
50434326060091010 KERTESS HANS W        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091020 CAROLAN RICHARD F 2001 TRUST        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091030 KAMPEL DANIEL S & KAMPEL LAURA G       1,568,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1568700 
50434326060091040 CASEY IRENE D        268,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091050 WILLIAMSON G T & PATRICIA J        1,438,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091060 BLAIR CLAUDE M & ROSE V BLAIR ROSE V       253,436.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091070 OBSER HERIBERT &        1,438,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1438500 
50434326060091080 REHNERT BERNADETTE T        1,568,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1568700 
50434326060091090 LUCCHETTI RAYMOND        1,135,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060091100 HIMMELSTEIN MARC & AYCOCK PAMELA       1,084,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1965   1722    1135050 
50434326060092010 WALDIN ERIK        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 201N 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092020 KREINDLER ELLEN C        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 202N 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092030 BLOMEYER STEPHANIE S        1,531,113.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2195550 
50434326060092050 SOUTH OCEAN LLC        2,195,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2195550 
50434326060092070 AWL LLC        1,573,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1573950 
50434326060092080 S & S LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HERBERT J STERN C/O       1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092090 LICKLE GARRISON D        290,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092100 FRANKENHOFF JILL H        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092110 GIBBONS MICHAEL J ESTEE LAUDER CO C/O       931,159.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092120 KEAN JOHN C        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092130 L ESPERANCE FAMILY CORP        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2130 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092140 FERRARA RALPH C & FERRARA BARBARA N       1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092150 WALDIN ERIK        1,418,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092160 RAIMONDO ROBERT C        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092170 KLEINBERG DAVID        1,468,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1468950 
50434326060092180 SULLIVAN KEVIN C        1,523,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1573950 
50434326060092190 HERBERT J GERALD SR FAM TRUST # V        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2190 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092200 NORDBACK CLARE A DONALD SCOTT C/O       417,486.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092210 HILL EDWARD R & MARSHA E        1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092220 LADD ROBERT T & LADD GEORGIANA B       1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092230 BURRUS PETER M & BURRUS ELIZABETH T       1,208,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2230 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1208550 
50434326060092240 WRIGHT RICHARD        1,169,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 2240 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1219050 
50434326060094010 PRICE GORDON W & PRICE BARBARA       1,239,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1239050 
50434326060094020 GILBANE SARAH B GILBANE ROBERT V       812,326.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094030 GARDINER NANCY T        812,326.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094040 PRAY NATALIE THOMAS        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094050 KORNEGAY BRYAN B JR & KORNEGAY CORISA C       1,178,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094060 GALLO DENNIS        606,262.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094070 BAIRD ELIZABETH G        1,593,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1593950 
50434326060094080 BEASLEY JANE        1,005,887.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094090 RICCOBENE MARY MELLON BANK NA TR &       1,005,887.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094100 MCDONOUGH RICOBENE MARY TRUST MCCUSKER FRANCIS C TR       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094110 FREE JAMES C & FREE ANN TODD       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094120 DODGE JOHN B        1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094130 BROUGHER NANCY M & BROUGHER W DALE       2,533,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1965   3432    2633400 
50434326060094150 400 S OCEAN II LLC & 400 S OCEAN I LLC       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094160 400 S OCEAN II LLC & 400 S OCEAN I LLC       1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 416E 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094170 MARROCCO ANTHONY TR        1,488,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1488950 
50434326060094180 GAMMINO ELIZABETH K GAMMINO ELIZABETH K TR       1,593,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1593950 
50434326060094190 JONES JANIS        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094200 SWEET ROBERT H EST        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094210 ROE RANDALL B        632,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1965   1095     632100 
50434326060094220 LEAMER LAURENCE & VESNA VESNA LEAMER       210,337.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094230 HANSEN JULIA S        1,228,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4230 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1228550 
50434326060094240 DEANGELIS MARJORIE        1,239,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 4240 0400 CONDO 1965   1716    1239050 
50434326060095010 HOULIHAN JAMES G & MARY M HOULIHAN TRS       1,982,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1965   1940    1982400 
50434326060095020 POLLARD CORNELIA B        773,945.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1965   2156    2087400 
50434326060095030 PBI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ALAN MENKES C/O       2,634,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1965   2376    2634450 
50434326060095040 TOSI DYANNE C        893,259.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1965   2749    2937900 
50434326060095060 SWAN DENISE G        1,525,675.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432606 FOUR HUNDRED SOUTH OCEAN CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1965   2376    2655450 
50434326070001010 WINN GAIL A        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1973   1590     571200 
50434326070001020 RUPERT JAIME A        352,347.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1973   1275     466200 
50434326070002010 KRISHNAN SANKAR & KRISHNAN SUSAN       487,622.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     643650 
50434326070002020 WIKSTROM SIEGLINDE        559,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002030 VANBUREN CYNTHIA        212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002040 SAVINA WILLIAM SAVINA VIRGINIA       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     559650 
50434326070002050 MAHLER WOLF PETER MAHLER WOLF PETER TR       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     643650 
50434326070003010 ALLEN NORMA W        199,375.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003020 DEMPSEY PATRICIA C        212,462.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003030 ANGELINI PATRICIA A        569,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003040 DAY DAVID J        519,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1973   1325     569650 
50434326070003050 RIKER HARLAND A & RIKER ANN M       212,962.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432607 CHALET BY THE OCEAN CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1973   1825     653650 
50434326080000021 KRAMER CHARLOTTE R TR HALLE BLDG C/O       3,613,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3613050 
50434326080000022 BENENSON GLADYS        3,438,110.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3556350 
50434326080000023 STRAUSS HAROLD E & STRAUSS MARLENE       2,638,108.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3556350 
50434326080000024 MORRISSEY JAMES F & KAY M KAY M MORRISSEY       1,582,880.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3613050 
50434326080000031 COLLINS KEVIN J SHEEHAN ROBERT W TR       1,968,016.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3813050 
50434326080000032 ASHTON HARRIS & ASHTON ANGELA       2,862,118.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3756350 
50434326080000033 SPRING CORP TRANSOCEANIC CORP C/O       3,756,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3756350 
50434326080000034 DUNGAN RAYMOND E & LEO SADE & DAVID HORNSTEIN       3,813,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    3813050 
50434326080000041 NIELSEN BARBARA H        3,810,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4013050 
50434326080000042 POLOZKER BRUCE W POLOZKER BRUCE W TR       2,404,309.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3956350 
50434326080000043 OURISMAN MARY M        3,086,126.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    3956350 
50434326080000044 MANNING JAMES P MANNING JAMES P TR       3,810,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4013050 
50434326080000051 DOCTER ALAN K & DOCTER MARCIA       2,696,488.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4213050 
50434326080000052 AMAR LEON & CHARLOTTE D IGOE-AMAR H/W       1,260,329.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4156350 
50434326080000053 MANDEL JOSEPH C MANDEL MORTON L TR       2,273,715.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4156350 
50434326080000054 BUCKLEY CAROLYN E        4,027,835.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4213050 
50434326080000061 YOUNG MARGARET TRUSTEE        1,332,401.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4413050 
50434326080000062 GERSHWIND MARJORIE        4,356,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4356350 
50434326080000063 BON DURANT ISABELLE H ISABELL H BON DURANT TR TITL       1,331,901.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1974   3850    4356350 
50434326080000064 KRAUS VALERIE        4,413,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432608 KIRKLAND HOUSE CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1974   4130    4413050 
50434326090000010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       266,149.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974    847     266149 
50434326090000020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       257,192.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974    824     257192 
50434326090001010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090001020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090001030 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090001040 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090002010 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090002020 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       151,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1974    486     151106 
50434326090002030 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326090002040 ONE TWENTY NINE LLC CURY GROUP C/O       178,747.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432609 LA CHAUMIERE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1974    576     178747 
50434326100001010 DUNLAP NANCY S        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     571200 
50434326100001020 HEFFERNAN PAUL M & ROBERT, FINNEGAN  AND LYNCH C/O       1,038,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1038450 
50434326100001030 CARPENTER ROSEMARY G        1,017,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1017450 
50434326100001040 MAKLER BARRY M &        118,879.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1975    827     442050 
50434326100001050 INGLIS JAMES D        442,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1975    827     442050 
50434326100001060 CURRY BERNARD F        149,588.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     716100 
50434326100001070 MCCARTIN LAWRENCE M TR        695,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     695100 
50434326100001080 INFANTE CAROLYN M        571,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     571200 
50434326100002010 HIGGINS EDWARD T & HIGGINS KATHLEEN M       623,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     623700 
50434326100002020 SALTY AIR PROPERTIES INC GC CONSULTANTS INC C/O       1,143,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1143450 
50434326100002030 BLUNDIN WILLIAM B        670,189.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1122450 
50434326100002040 HATCH JAMES A & FRANCES N        644,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     644700 
50434326100002050 DIAZ MARIA A R        644,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     644700 
50434326100002060 THREE 50 HLDG INC ROYAL BK CANADA/L GENGE C/O       768,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     768600 
50434326100002070 FIRST PALM BEACH PROP INC        747,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     747600 
50434326100002080 KRANICH MICHAEL M SR        573,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     623700 
50434326100003010 ONEGLIA A GEORGE TR & TR DEPT, DAVID ONEGLIA TR C/O       648,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     648700 
50434326100003020 MARSCHEL GLENN W & MARSCHEL KAY E       1,193,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1975   1234    1193450 
50434326100003030 MORMORIS STEPHEN C        751,431.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1975   1186    1172450 
50434326100003040 SIEDLIK LAWRENCE E        336,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     669700 
50434326100003050 GROSS LOUIS II & PHYLLIS M GROSS PHYLLIS M       197,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1975   1210     669700 
50434326100003060 ENGLERT PETER & ENGLERT NORMA       793,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1975   1186     793600 
50434326100003070 PALM BEACH BUILDING SERVICES INC        772,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1975   1234     772600 
50434326100003080 AMERICAN NATL BK & TRUST CO TR        648,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432610 THREE FIFTY CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1975   1182     648700 
50434326110000011 ALBRECHT PRISCILLA        486,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0011 0400 CONDO 1976   1189     536000 
50434326110000021 CLONINGER JEFFREY A &        403,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0021 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000022 BENVENISTE EVANGELINE        581,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0022 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000023 BOWES WENDY L        403,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0023 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000024 SALERNO JEAN SALERNO JEAN TR       507,760.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0024 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     581000 
50434326110000031 STEPHAN CAROLINA IZQUIERDO        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0031 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000032 DONNELLY PENELOPE E        225,058.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0032 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000033 GEORGITSIS IRO        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0033 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000034 GOFMAN ALEX &        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0034 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     601000 
50434326110000041 VANDYCK LINDA A        145,445.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0041 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000042 ZOVKO MARY A & JAAP W HILBRAND       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0042 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000043 DESIMONE DANIEL P & STENBERG ALAN R       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0043 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000044 VAN DER HEIDE DOUGLAS & VAN DER HEIDE RUTH       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0044 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     621000 
50434326110000051 HONEYSUCKLE HILL INVESTMENT CO        641,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0051 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000052 LEELANAU LAND LLC        641,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0052 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000053 WOOD PATRICIA M        570,060.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0053 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000054 JANSSEN EILEEN F        570,060.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0054 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     641000 
50434326110000061 MERRIEN JEANNINE P MERRIEN FRANCOISE TR       340,895.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0061 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000062 KLINGER BARBARA J KLINGER BARBARA J TR       228,156.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0062 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000063 PETRY ANNE C & PETRY PAUL E       590,660.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0063 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000064 KESSELMAN MARK L & DE ANDRADE KESSELMAN E       661,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0064 0400 CONDO 1976   1201     661000 
50434326110000071 WREN WINSTON D & WREN ALLISON K       326,648.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0071 0400 CONDO 1976   1403     913000 
50434326110000072 GUSMAN IRWIN J        783,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432611 EVERGLADES PLAZA CONDO *** 0072 0400 CONDO 1976   1360     833000 
50434326120000010 TOSI LAURENCE A III        229,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1976    618     229950 
50434326120000020 ABIUSO CHERYL        51,490.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1976    559     174300 
50434326120000030 SALERNO ROBERT M        225,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1976    604     225750 
50434326120000040 BAER NANCY        178,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1976    604     178500 
50434326120000050 MOESER RICHARD M        299,650.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1976   1044     349650 
50434326120000071 KAPPLER CHARLES E        274,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0071 0400 CONDO 1976    827     274050 
50434326120000090 HURLEY ARTHUR J JR & MARYBETH        270,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1976    930     270900 
50434326120000100 BECK SUZANNE        136,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1976    398     136500 
50434326120000110 CALARESO DONALD A & JUDITH A        164,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1976    461     164850 
50434326120000120 DIETZ HUGH T        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1976    357     120750 
50434326120000141 STOLL SUZANNE        274,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0141 0400 CONDO 1976    827     274050 
50434326120000160 SCHAEFER JOSEPH W & SCHAEFER SHAYNA YEERA &       216,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1976    930     266700 
50434326120000170 VKO INC        136,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1976    398     136500 
50434326120000180 SALERNO LAURA LPR PERUVIAN REALTY TRUST       431,620.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432612 PERUVIAN CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1976   2228     522900 
50434326130000021 HIGHT NELL W WACHOVIA BANK TR       2,615,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2615550 
50434326130000022 PONTON DANIEL E        1,661,973.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2200800 
50434326130000023 BROWN SAURINE L & SAURINE BROWN TR TITL HLDR       2,361,230.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2563050 
50434326130000031 BSJ LLC        2,665,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2665550 
50434326130000032 FINK MARJORIE S        1,243,153.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2250800 
50434326130000033 EHRLICH STEPHEN R & EHRLICH MARY       2,010,665.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2613050 
50434326130000041 LONG ROBERT E & LONG KATHRYN S       2,715,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2715550 
50434326130000042 DAFER INC        2,300,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2300800 
50434326130000043 MERIN ANDREW J & MERIN KENNETH S &       902,105.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2663050 
50434326130000051 LUBOW ELINOR C LUBOW ELINOR C TR       794,881.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2765550 
50434326130000052 MANSON WILLIAM J JR TR & MANSON ANNE T  TR       2,350,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2350800 
50434326130000053 PONTE VEDRA CORP INC RABIDEAU GUY C/O       2,713,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2713050 
50434326130000061 NICHOLSON JAMES &        2,815,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2815550 
50434326130000062 WINSTON BELLE R TR & WINSTON BELLE R TR &       966,966.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1978   2384    2400800 
50434326130000063 TAUBMAN JUDITH M        2,763,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432613 DUNSTER HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1978   2500    2763050 
50434326140000010 LOVE GALLERY PLACE LOVE REALTY C/O       4,150,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326140000020 LOVE GALLERY PLACE LOVE REALTY C/O       2,100,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326140000030 HALS REALTY ASSOCIATES LTD        1,935,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432614 GALLERY PLACE COND* 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1980      0          1 
50434326150001010 WEBER MARVIN & WEBER MARY ANN       787,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     837900 
50434326150001020 WILLCOX CHRISTINE L        730,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     837900 
50434326150002010 MCDONOUGH M P & MCDONOUGH FLORENCE S       571,626.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     847900 
50434326150002020 WEBSTER JOSEPH A III & WEBSTER MARY C       475,923.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     847900 
50434326150003010 HOLLIS EARL A JR        417,875.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     857900 
50434326150003020 KERESEY ANNE S        475,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432615 REGENCY SIX CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2200     857900 
50434326160000010 SALTEX DEVELOPMENT LP        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000020 HARRIS ROY B JR        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000030 LAGORCE JOHN O II & LAGORCE DEBORAH W       488,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1982    650     488250 
50434326160000040 GREENE J VAUGHN        69,247.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1982    423     343350 
50434326160000050 JAMES DANIEL H & JAMES SYLVIA S &       790,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     790400 
50434326160000060 ARTHUR WARREN & MAI TSAO        689,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1982    937     689850 
50434326160000070 OWEN STEPHEN B & OWEN CECILIA P       785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     785400 
50434326160000080 BUSH LARRY M & BUSH ARLENE       798,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1982   1181     798000 
50434326160000090 KENAN ROBERTA S        643,190.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1982   1127     790400 
50434326160000100 LARUE BRIAN        435,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1982    594     485100 
50434326160000110 SMITH KIMBERLY H        501,657.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432616 CASA 214 CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1982    661     557550 
50434326170000011 WELCH ELRIEDE J WELCH ELRIEDE J TR       115,475.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     549150 
50434326170000012 MERCK GEORGE F        539,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     539700 
50434326170000013 MILLER KEITHLEY R TR        759,618.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1985   2574     971250 
50434326170000015 BOHN PHILIP N & BOHN SUSAN B       549,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     549150 
50434326170000021 LOVEJOY FAITH F        463,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     564150 
50434326170000022 BENHAM DAVID B & BENHAM MARGARET W       554,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000023 JENKINS LEILA C        199,868.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000024 VAN INGEN ALEXANDRA        453,670.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     554700 
50434326170000025 HOLTON CARLOTA H HOLTON FAMILY TR       463,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     564150 
50434326170000031 FARKAS ROBIN L & FARKAS CAROL       579,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     579150 
50434326170000032 HOLMAN CHARLES S JR        127,155.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000033 CURRIE EMMA L        468,620.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000034 REMMEL LITTLE JEAN        469,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     569700 
50434326170000035 GEORGE DONNA L        579,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     579150 
50434326170000041 BARNETT VICTOR TRS ET AL CALER DONTEN LEVINE C/O       594,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     594150 
50434326170000042 SKENDER IVAN & JANE C SILVA       336,769.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000043 BELLINGBRATH DENNY R TR        584,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000044 RIEGEL LAWRENCE M &        584,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     584700 
50434326170000045 GEDDES GERALD & ANNETTE        594,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     594150 
50434326170000051 LAGATTA-SHELTON FRANCES        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1984   1287     619500 
50434326170000052 SEZNA DAVIS G        610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1984   1287     610050 
50434326170000053 THOMAS RUTH M K        610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     610050 
50434326170000054 DE PASS ELIZABETH E & DE PASS DAVID V G       610,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     610050 
50434326170000055 MICHEL GEORGE J JR & PAULINE M        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432617 MELBORNE HOUSE CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1985   1287     619500 
50434326180001010 GUBELMANN SUSAN M        350,976.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1985   1260     610050 
50434326180001030 COLLINS SHEILA S TR        326,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1987    620     326550 
50434326180001040 GIBBONS VERA        330,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1987    640     330750 
50434326180002010 HOWAR JOYCE L HOWAR JOYCE L TR       861,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1987   1401     929250 
50434326180002020 SAVINA LINDA M        203,729.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1987   1143     592200 
50434326180011010 COLLINS SHEILA S        454,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1987    774     454650 
50434326180011020 COLLINS SHEILA S        337,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1987    661     337050 
50434326180011030 COLLINS SHEILA S        306,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1987    479     306600 
50434326180011040 GIBBONS JOHN D JR        306,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432618 MID OCEAN CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1987    479     306600 
50434326190000010 CPG BRAZILIAN        560,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 1 0400 CONDO 1989    797     560700 
50434326190000020 PRICE DONALD B JR &        429,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    672     429450 
50434326190000030 LOOKABAUGH CINDY K        158,506.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 3 0400 CONDO 1989    991     572250 
50434326190000040 BANNISTER DAVID G & BANNISTER DEBRA B       561,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO 4 0400 CONDO 1989   1064     611100 
50434326190000050 HICKS ERIC & HICKS JULIE       510,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432619 PERUVIAN COURT CONDO  0400 CONDO 1989    854     510300 
50434326210000010 SCALA LOUIS C        298,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 1 0400 CONDO 1950    541     298000 
50434326210000020 SCALA LOUIS C        217,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 2 0400 CONDO 1950    378     217000 
50434326210000030 MILLER BARRY A        155,523.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 3 0400 CONDO 1950    378     217000 
50434326210000040 INGA HIILIVIRTA REVOCABLE TR        456,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1950    903     456000 
50434326210000050 CRETELLA ELEANOR        318,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1950    698     368000 
50434326210000060 PALMHEART INC        578,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432621 CHILEAN COURT CONDO *** 6 0400 CONDO 1950    980     578000 
50434327010000510 BROWN PETER D & NANCY I BROWN NANCY I       3,496,109.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 05 06 01 2    2240799       7279       8132       6492                 
50434327010000521 GRUBMAN JUDITH M        3,946,688.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 04 03 01 2     766149       5004       5772       4449                 
50434327010000522 DROSDICK JOHN G &        5,330,260.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1995 04 05 00 2     532262       4622       5028       4165                 
50434327010000530 BALCOM LUCILLE P BALCOM LUCILLE P TR       4,570,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 05 04 01 1      20580       5218       6135       4083                 
50434327010000541 BAXTER LAURA        1,782,263.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 2      18532       4681       4870       4346                 
50434327010000550 CALLAHAN LEONORA A CALLAHAN LEONORA A TR       4,840,276.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1998 05 07 01 2    2044905       6765       7686       6203                 
50434327010000570 MILLNER VIRGINIA W ASSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION C/0       6,931,223.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1990 05 06 01 2    1546504       7781       8665       6800                 
50434327010000580 DODGE LORE H & LISE G MORAN       5,295,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 04 04 01 2      19901       5027       5547       4555                 
50434327010000591 RUMBOUGH STANLEY M & JANNE H JANNE H RUMBOUGH       4,074,546.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 05 06 01 2    2043456       6858       7578       6344                 
50434327010000601 CIOMEK ZDZISLAW & RADTKE JANINA       5,097,950.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327010000611 WEAN ADELAIDE M WEAN ADELAIDE M TR       9,269,970.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 04 05 00 2      21143       5310       5740       4888                 
50434327010000621 MATTEI JAMES E MATTEI JAMES E TR       9,904,650.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 04 04 02     2296495       7152       7814       6630                 
50434327010000631 BAXTER HAROLD AYCO CO. PERS ACCTG C/O       10,735,403.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1997 04 05 01 1    2132104       5983       6291       5494                 
50434327010000641 COLEMAN DENIS P & ANNABELLE G ANNABELLE G COLEMAN       4,811,229.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 06 00 1    2136179       8303       9418       7400                 
50434327010000661 ISLAND REALTY        8,198,532.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 05 04 01 2     250495       4379       4824       3874                 
50434327010000670 FISHER BARBARA M & FISHER A J III       3,243,342.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327010000690 HARRINGTON RICHARD L        2,184,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1975 03 04 01 1      18058       4238       4610       3469                 
50434327010000701 674 ISLAND DR LLC        3,011,624.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 04 04 01 2    1128950       5704       6138       4662                 
50434327010000702 BURKHEAD J GARY & J GARY BURKHEAD ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       4,112,420.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1995 04 05 01 1.5     962149       7891       8783       6744                 
50434327010000800 PREMIER HOLDING GROUP LLC        9,326,931.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327020000710 ROTHFELD ERIC &        12,693,724.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 08 01 2    2480450       9836      10933       8809                 
50434327020000731 MCIVER BRIAN MCIVER PAMELA       4,796,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 04 05 00 2    2085624       7032       7299       6603                 
50434327020000740 PATTERSON JAMES B PEYSER & ALEXANDER C/O       5,713,764.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1995 05 05 01 2    1992110       9049      10996       7966                 
50434327020000751 ALJ LLC        12,085,543.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1974 03 04 01 2      21075       5129       5819       4307                 
50434327020000761 TEAGLE JAYNE W FRED SHAPSS C/O       6,284,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1965 00 01 00 1       5083        659        810        594                 
50434327020000761 TEAGLE JAYNE W FRED SHAPSS C/O       6,284,500.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1970 03 03 01 1      23748       4121       4618       3464                 
50434327020000781 BARRETT DIANA        12,528,529.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1949 1995 04 04 01 2      32010       4916       5583       4270                 
50434327020000791 COLLIN CHERYL E        12,102,200.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1975 04 04 01 1      49256       5460       5719       5035                 
50434327020000821 GUBELMANN WILLIAM GUBELMANN WILLIAM TR       7,338,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 02 2    2592732       7728       9452       6545                 
50434327020000830 AMES STEVEN        13,082,285.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327020000841 BEALL KENNETH S JR        2,089,695.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1980 05 07 01 1     292794       6527       7542       5325                 
50434327020000851 JOHNSON RICHARD S & PATSY S JOHNSON PATSY S       2,723,932.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 05 04 01 1     882994       5107       5403       4651                 
50434327020000880 CARPENTER E N II & CARROLL M        8,160,187.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 04 01 1      17796       4594       5022       4159                 
50434327020000890 HAGGIN JOHN B JR        2,806,603.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1956 04 05 01 2      25439       6170       7448       5123                 
50434327020000900 KAZEMINY NASSER & KAZEMINY YVONNE P       7,084,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1995 05 05 00 2      79641       8239       8801       7175                 
50434327030000251 ABC RENT A CAR LTD        5,600,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327030000252 ABC RENT A CAR LTD        9,783,201.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1990 04 04 01 1    1657438       6961       7411       6014                 
50434327030000270 HENNESSY EDWARD L JR & RUTH S HENNESSY RUTH S       2,671,160.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1990 05 06 01 2    1393384       7005       7228       6526                 
50434327030000280 DWARES BONNIE DWARES BONNIE TR       5,859,009.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1985 05 07 01 2      30160       7006       8380       6394                 
50434327030000291 REMINGTON KAMILA        2,001,450.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 04 05 01 2      23941       5880       7474       4290                 
50434327030000310 RAKOLTA TERRY L ROSEN MARVIN S TR TITL HLDR LAND TST       12,069,435.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 02 2    3945907       8360      10159       7239                 
50434327030000320 HICKOX CHARLES C        4,467,632.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 05 01 1      22264       5419       5712       5103                 
50434327030000340 CORRIGAN HAROLD F & CORRIGAN LORRAINE       4,818,045.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 2001 05 04 00 2    1087991       7640       8674       6874                 
50434327030000350 CUDLIP MARY BRITTAIN B        5,001,820.00 0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1990 05 06 01 2     104287       8106       8361       7368                 
50434327030000361 KEAN IAN M        3,755,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 01 01 00 1       3149        754        776        744                 
50434327030000361 KEAN IAN M        3,755,846.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 04 01 2      17571       4534       4963       3993                 
50434327030000372 RINKER RUBY S TR        8,129,787.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1975 04 04 01 2      18895       4597       5325       3817                 
50434327030000400 BARBARA FRED HUMBERT LISA       4,497,711.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 08 00 2    1831810       6837       8148       6314                 
50434327030000410 ASCHE F B JR & SARAH P TRUST ASCHE FREDERIC B JR TR       7,652,660.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1975 05 07 00 1      55105       5934       6163       5465                 
50434327030000420 LICKLE RENEE K & LICKLE WILLIAM C       2,891,131.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 04 05 01 2    1181304       7133       7522       6698                 
50434327030000430 575 ISLAND DRIVE TRUST ZISKA MAURA TR       7,587,125.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327030000440 FISHER-GROW CHRISTINE CHRISTINE FISHER-GROW TR TITL HLDR       4,512,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1990 05 04 00 2     787064       6897       7589       6244                 
50434327030000450 STARK JOHN &        8,663,648.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1985 05 07 01 2    1093417       8469      10021       7683                 
50434327030000460 POLLACK EDWARD & DEBORAH DEBORAH POLLACK       1,891,153.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1985 04 05 00 2      18991       4674       5565       4503                 
50434327030000470 KNUDSEN JUDITH F        3,307,820.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 00 00 1    1224107       5517       6048       4924                 
50434327030000481 JOHNSON MARGARET A & JOHNSON THOMAS S       6,480,694.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1995 04 05 01 2    1719534       7454       8811       6655                 
50434327030000482 BERLEY PETER & BERLEY LINDA K       6,674,767.00 0.4626 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 07 00 2    2600138       7548       8744       6599                 
50434327040000010 ISLAND ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        7,526,141.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1965 04 05 01 2     245041       6406       6658       6028                 
50434327040000010 ISLAND ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        7,526,141.00 0.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 03 03 00 2      65660       2270       2270       2270                 
50434327040000031 HUFTY FRANCES A HUFTY FRANCES A TR       2,728,352.00 0.5386 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 05 01 2     621017       6383       6562       6010                 
50434327040000051 HUFTY PAGE LEE & BELL THEODORE A III       3,885,806.00 0.5055 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 05 04 01 1     392663       4470       4508       4454                 
50434327040000061 SMITH JANE W &        2,248,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 05 06 01 2     206262       6333       6903       5757                 
50434327040000072 VIOLET HILL DEV CO LTD        6,006,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327040000090 FALK MICHAEL & FALK ANNIE       5,605,614.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 04 05 01 2    3184321       9259      10718       8263                 
50434327040000101 VIOLET HILL DEV CO        8,884,836.00 0.53 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 2000 00 06 01 2    2421781       8095       9908       7166                 
50434327050000012 101 EL BRAVO LLC        12,316,500.00 0 VACANT                           
50434327050000020 TROPIN KENNETH G & TROPIN KATHLEEN O       18,445,897.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1922 2001 07 09 04 2    6251125      11736      14318      10843                 
50434327050000040 4 EL BRAVO TRUST & BROBERG PETER S TR       5,956,275.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 05 06 01 3.5    1666718      10657      11072      10496                 
50434327050000040 4 EL BRAVO TRUST & BROBERG PETER S TR       5,956,275.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 01 01 00 2     127554       1568       2200        825                 
50434327050000060 KOCH RONALD B & KOCH PAULETTE W       5,270,556.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1973 05 06 01 1    1138207       7492       8171       6445                 
50434327050000191 VAN WAVEREN JEAN M VAN WAVEREN JEAN M TR       3,193,917.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1950 05 08 01 2     190774       9217      10495       8359                 
50434327050000192 KARAKUL KENN BROBERG PETER S TR       5,264,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1984 04 05 01 2     847985       5253       5532       4668                 
50434327050000192 KARAKUL KENN BROBERG PETER S TR       5,264,651.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 1      85913        792        792        792                 
50434327050000200 OCEANIC PLACE PROPERTIES LLC KENNETH WANG C/O       15,290,994.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 09 01 2    2201413      10536      11654       9706                 
50434327050000220 TAYLOR MARGARETTA D MARENTETTE C/O       7,486,409.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1980 05 10 01 3    2845581      11824      12606      11160                 
50434327050000230 MASHEK CHANDLER C        5,346,311.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1996 1996 00 08 01 2    4833995       9482      12090       8183                 
50434327050000240 GORDON DONALD &        9,897,545.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 01 01 00 2      90584       1347       1585        793                 
50434327050000240 GORDON DONALD &        9,897,545.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 00 06 02 2    5179148       8697      11072       7864                 
50434327050000380 TOLL WILLIAM M        9,296,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1975 05 09 00 2     262967      10737      12321       9690                 
50434327060000070 CUMMINGS PETER D & CUMMINGS JULIE F       4,793,788.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1980 05 08 00 2    1874719       7549       7884       6832                 
50434327060000081 SUMMERS GEORGE E        2,477,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1995 04 05 01 2    1883274       6995       7366       6113                 
50434327060000090 FAILING BRUCE & FAILING LEIGH       3,497,271.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 05 05 01 2    1048639       7611       8547       6592                 
50434327060000100 VLAHOS DEAN &        4,063,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1996 01 01 00 1      29371        295        421          1                 
50434327060000100 VLAHOS DEAN &        4,063,007.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1996 04 05 01 2    1124093       6206       7524       5788                 
50434327060000110 WOODWARD ORATOR E 251 EL BRAVO TRUST       1,647,338.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1965 04 05 01 2    1145940       5750       6087       4727                 
50434327060000120 MILLER ALAN H & MILLER HARRIET L       7,997,212.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 05 06 01 2    6039178      11052      13837       9510                 
50434327060000131 FIVERSON NANCY        10,458,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 02 02 00 1      89822       1140       1205        989                 
50434327060000131 FIVERSON NANCY        10,458,348.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 06 00 1     543057       6336       7181       5717                 
50434327060000150 BOVE MICHAEL J III BOVE PAMELA A       1,356,044.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1950 02 02 00 2      83006       1224       1440        720                 
50434327060000150 BOVE MICHAEL J III BOVE PAMELA A       1,356,044.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1965 03 05 01 2     811043       6189       6478       5798                 
50434327060000160 MOORE DUDLEY L JR & MOORE MARGARET B       10,456,746.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 08 09 02 2.5    6644864      14461      18095      12799                 
50434327060000180 PROSSER JEFFREY PROSSER DAWN       7,591,804.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1995 05 08 01 3    4111164      10842      12357       9958                 
50434327060000251 QUICK PATRICIA        4,829,335.00 0.4557 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 05 01 2    2958908       6884       7800       5995                 
50434327060000252 MORGAN MITCHELL & HILARIE L TRUSTEE MORGAN HILARIE L TRUSTEE       14,366,084.00 0.9939 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1950 05 06 01 3    2248845      13535      14756      12669                 
50434327060000270 GAY DEBORAH H        6,126,443.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 06 01 2    2639692       7005       7738       6188                 
50434327060000280 KARP JAMES S & KARP IRENE J       5,413,751.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 07 01 2    2882146       8408       9490       7766                 
50434327060000290 WETHERELL DAVID        4,826,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1932 02 02 00 2     124673       2732       3232       1564                 
50434327060000290 WETHERELL DAVID        4,826,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 06 00 2    1213808       5031       5449       4856                 
50434327060000321 CUNNINGHAM JOHN F & ELLEN M CUNNINGHAM ELLEN M       3,885,901.00 0.68 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 05 01 2    1675737       8109       9925       7328                 
50434327060000330 ROSINSKY CLAUDE        2,098,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1975 01 01 00 2     108600       1275       1500        750                 
50434327060000330 ROSINSKY CLAUDE        2,098,259.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 05 06 01 2    1535742       5417       5513       5273                 
50434327060000341 SHIELDS MAURY F & SHIELDS J V JR       4,953,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 01 01 00 2     527070       1996       2496       1713                 
50434327060000341 SHIELDS MAURY F & SHIELDS J V JR       4,953,374.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 04 04 01 2    2378086       4428       5461       4140                 
50434327060000350 MURRAY TERRENCE & TERRENCE MURRAY TR TITL HLDR       3,808,566.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1960 04 05 01 2    1410961       5870       6657       4993                 
50434327060000361 MAHONEY DANIEL J III MAHONEY SUZANNE       2,379,150.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1960 04 05 01 2    1116250       6248       6575       6125                 
50434327060000361 MAHONEY DANIEL J III MAHONEY SUZANNE       2,379,150.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1961 01 01 00 2     102234       1904       2240       1120                 
50434327060000371 CONDRON CHRISTOPHER M & CONDRON MARGARET M       5,484,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1993 01 01 00 2      87812        953       1372        536                 
50434327060000371 CONDRON CHRISTOPHER M & CONDRON MARGARET M       5,484,366.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1993 04 05 01 2    1929099       6046       6369       5907                 
50434327060000381 COLLIER BARRON G II TR        4,596,971.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 04 05 01 2    1120310       6956       7446       5930                 
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 05 07 01 2    1201050       9510      11441       8004                 
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 01 01 00 1     102505       1122       1122       1122                 
50434327060000391 EPSTEIN JEFFREY        10,750,308.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 03 03 00 1     179025       1660       1660       1660                 
50434327060000410 MORGAN MITCHELL & HILARIE L TRUSTEE        10,000.00 0 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434327070000010 NEWQUIST SCOTT C        7,712,783.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 06 00 2    2148288      11307      12891       9472                 
50434327080000110 COWELL RICHARD C        2,345,915.00 0.7 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 08 01 2    2402408       8526       8988       7820                 
50434327080000421 ROSS WILBUR L JR        4,698,648.00 0.3647 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1980 05 06 01 2     925331       6810       7116       5719                 
50434327080000422 DOCTOR DANIEL W & DOCTOR JUDITH E       4,266,365.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1995 04 04 01 2    1281897       5278       5685       4951                 
50434327080000440 ROSS WILBUR L JR        9,985,675.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1990 05 06 00 2    2849855      11164      12727      10343                 
50434327080000450 ARASKOG RAND V ARASKOG JESSIE M       7,055,365.00 0.8647 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1999 10 07 00 1    7032341      13511      14900      12374                 
50434327080000471 MEYER WILLIAM A & MEYER DENISE S       5,446,691.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 2001 05 07 00 2    1216906       6237       7552       5426                 
50434327080000480 MORRISON CARLOS        9,652,232.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1965 05 07 01 1     140318      14620      15379      14015                 
50434327080000500 WISTER DIANA S        6,298,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1975 05 07 00 2    1468149       9101       9747       8753                 
50434327080000500 WISTER DIANA S        6,298,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1959 02 02 00 1     153953       1582       1582       1582                 
50434327080000520 FARRIS CECILIA L        2,248,198.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1950 05 08 01 3    1643085      11749      12406      11278                 
50434327080000531 QUICK THOMAS C        4,972,736.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1990 05 07 01 2    1900282       9011      10428       7981                 
50434327360000010 MURRAY W STEPHEN & MURRAY MUFFIE BANCROFT       1,509,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1971   3280    1509900 
50434327360000020 EDWARDS JAMES C & EDWARDS MARGARET B       1,534,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1971   2730    1534050 
50434327360000030 PERRY MARINA R PERRY MARINA R TR TITL HLDR       311,134.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000040 PALADINO WILLIAM JR & DIANE DIANE R PALADINO       309,965.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1971   1575    1080450 
50434327360000050 SAMSON MARVIN        1,679,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1971   3507    1729350 
50434327360000060 THOMAS BYRON F & THOMAS MARY H       1,561,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1971   3447    1561350 
50434327360000070 FORTIN FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC        1,080,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1971   1575    1080450 
50434327360000080 PALMIERI FRANCIS L JR        539,144.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000090 GOULD GEORGE &        1,082,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1971   1579    1082550 
50434327360000100 LEIST ALAN R        1,111,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1971   1622    1111950 
50434327360000110 BAUMAN SUZANNE P BAUMAN SUZANNE P TR       559,319.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432736 CASAS DEL CARLOS CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1971   3623    1625400 
50434327380000010 LONGENBACH BRUCE R & LONGENBACH VERONICA K       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0010 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000020 LONGENBACH BRUCE & LONGENBACH VERONICA K       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0020 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000030 WISE KATHLEEN E        299,454.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0030 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000040 TALTY BERNARD J        555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0040 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000050 ZUNG LAURA & ROBERTS NATHANIEL T       555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0050 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000060 FREDERICKS DOUGLAS E        299,454.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0060 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000070 OLIVER ALBERT J JR        121,199.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0070 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327380000080 MARINACCIO MARILYN        555,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432738 THREE TWENTY CHILEAN CONDO *** 0080 0400 CONDO 1964   1167     555000 
50434327390001010 KOPHELM ALLEN D        380,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     380100 
50434327390001030 PICKETT JOHN O JR & PICKETT ROBIN R       518,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1963   1160     518700 
50434327390001040 LARSEN HEIKKI        131,491.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     328650 
50434327390001050 MATWICZYK PETER & MATWICZYK CAROL       347,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1963    595     347550 
50434327390002010 KOPHELM ALLEN D        383,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     383100 
50434327390002020 CALLAHAN ELEANOR K TR        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390002030 KALTHOFF ROSEMARY H        127,975.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1963    580     331650 
50434327390002040 TAMASI GUY TAMASI SABINE H       60,319.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     331650 
50434327390002050 GRINKEVICH GALINA        300,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1963    595     350550 
50434327390003010 DANIELE DONNA        386,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1963    715     386100 
50434327390003020 BREYER HENRY W III        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390003030 NESHER ROBERT A & NESHER JILL C       335,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1963    580     334650 
50434327390003040 EDELSTEIN DAVID N        334,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1963    580     334650 
50434327390003050 HESSLER DALLAS        353,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1963    595     353550 
50434327390004010 LAND ACQUI CORP        428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1963    830     428400 
50434327390004020 RODRIGUEZ LUGO JORGE        492,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1963   1025     492450 
50434327390004030 FELDKAMP WILLIAM P        310,655.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432739 PERUVIAN TERRACE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1963   1025     492450 
50434327430000010 ALBAN JOYCE        693,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974   1133     693000 
50434327430000020 MOONIE CLYDE W & LIANA M        1,220,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1220100 
50434327430000030 RUSSELL COLETTE L        835,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1011150 
50434327430000040 PALMER RICHARD W & PALMER SUSAN M       1,124,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1124550 
50434327430000050 LARKIN OWEN G &        846,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1021150 
50434327430000060 LOSNER SHIRLEY        1,230,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1230100 
50434327430000070 BREYER HENRY W III        846,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1021150 
50434327430000080 BULLOCK SUSANNE B &        946,010.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1134550 
50434327430000090 TALOTTA LOUIS J        1,031,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1031150 
50434327430000100 ANDERSON ANDREE G TRUST ANDERSON ANDREE G TR       1,240,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1974   1989    1240100 
50434327430000110 MORRIS JONATHAN H        856,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1974   1686    1031150 
50434327430000120 REINUS FOY Y TR        234,590.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432743 AUSTRALIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1974   1914    1144550 
50434327440000010 ALBAN FAMILY TRUST ALBAN MAE JOYCE TRS       966,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0010 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1178     966000 
50434327440000020 ZACHARY COSTA & ZACHARY RUTH S       139,875.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0020 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1240     994350 
50434327440000030 LIMOLI JULE E & LIMOLI DANA L       976,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432744 MAISON TROIS CONDO 0030 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1979   1178     976500 
50434327450002010 WARREN DONALD E & WARREN BETTY ANNE       828,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1118250 
50434327450002020 SCOTT DONALD B & SCOTT ELIZABETH M       759,042.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1978   2096     975450 
50434327450002030 ALBAN MADELEINE S TR        1,118,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1118250 
50434327450003010 PELLAR DONALD & PELLAR MARCIA       365,834.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1128250 
50434327450003020 LEHNER SYLVIA P EST        305,527.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1978   2096     985450 
50434327450003030 JOHNSTON VIVIAN S TRUSTEE JOHNSTON VIVIAN S TRUST       768,103.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432745 FOUR HUNDRED ONE WORTH AV CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1978   2436    1128250 
50434327460010010 BALLINGER WALTER F II BALLINGER WALTER F II TR       759,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010020 POPE WILLIAM        809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010030 BALLINGER WALTER F II TRUST WALTER F BALLINGER II TR       809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460010040 DEAR RICHARD K        809,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1983   1365     809550 
50434327460020021 EDDY MARJORIE CIZEK REV TRUST        685,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     685650 
50434327460020022 ARNOLD JANE & ARNOLD STEPHEN H       371,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1983    782     371700 
50434327460020023 BERMAN DALE & ALLISON C ALLISON C BERMAN       141,055.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     720300 
50434327460020024 GREENE WILLIAM B CARTER COUNTRY BANK C/O       720,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     720300 
50434327460020025 YANOW JOAN C        434,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1983    782     434700 
50434327460020026 THAYER SHEILA R        448,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     685650 
50434327460020031 CLARKE DONNA H        341,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     690650 
50434327460020032 REMMERT ELIZABETH D TR        439,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1983    782     439700 
50434327460020033 JENRETTE JON S & JENRETTE MARY H       725,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     725300 
50434327460020034 JCF PARTNERSHIP NANCY J DILLEY C/O       725,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     725300 
50434327460020035 DI LORENZO DANIELA        439,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1983    782     439700 
50434327460020036 CHAPDELAINE JEAN-LOUIS & CHAPDELAINE JUDY       690,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     690650 
50434327460020041 DOWLING ROBERT S & RENWICK W CROSBY       695,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     695650 
50434327460020042 SAFYURTLU ALI        252,412.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1983    782     444700 
50434327460020043 TECHGLAD INC        730,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     730300 
50434327460020044 VAUDIN YANNA        128,894.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     730300 
50434327460020045 SMITH JOHN R        444,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1983    782     444700 
50434327460020046 LEATHERMAN S R &        695,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     695650 
50434327460020051 SEGERDAHL KATHLEEN A LEIDER GERARD TR       464,351.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     700650 
50434327460020052 SCHALLMAN MIRIAM B SCHALLMAN MIRIAM B TR       360,470.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1983    782     449700 
50434327460020053 BREYER HENRY W III        735,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     735300 
50434327460020054 FRANK JUDITH A & R A FRANK SR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC       735,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     735300 
50434327460020055 GIBBONS JOHN D        449,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1983    782     449700 
50434327460020056 RANDOLPH FRANK W RANDOLPH FRANK W TR       181,547.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     700650 
50434327460020061 BECK LAURA        612,290.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     705650 
50434327460020062 HARRIS AUDREY P HARRIS AUDREY P TR       366,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1983    782     454700 
50434327460020063 SPLAWN REBECCA L        740,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     740300 
50434327460020064 CHRISTMAN ROGER        740,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1983   1225     740300 
50434327460020065 MORRIS JONATHAN H        454,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0065 0400 CONDO 1983    782     454700 
50434327460020066 PEARL FRANK H & PEARL GERYL T       705,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432746 ISLAND HOUSE CONDO 0066 0400 CONDO 1983   1193     705650 
50434327520000010 ANDERSON JOHN W II        1,486,164.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 02 03 00 2     300336       4699       5052       4282                 
50434327520000020 DENTON VICKIE        422,892.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 03 04 01 1.5     286417       4480       4757       4086                 
50434327520000030 BELISLE MICHAEL & GARY LINDA A       1,160,461.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1995 03 04 01 2     315474       4480       4757       4086                 
50434327520000040 MATTHEWS BETSY K MATTHEWS BETSY K TR       572,723.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 02 03 01 2     303147       4743       5096       4326                 
50434327530001010 MCCURRACH DOUGLAS S & MCCURRACH DANIELA M       753,855.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1982   2284    1258950 
50434327530001020 DICKSON SUSAN K        1,304,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1982   2323    1304100 
50434327530001030 GALANTUCCI ROBERT L & GALANTUCCI PATRICIA       1,088,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1982   1955    1088850 
50434327530002010 CARLSON JEAN        1,258,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1982   2284    1258950 
50434327530002020 NESHER ROBERT A & NESHER JILL C       1,254,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1982   2323    1304100 
50434327530002030 HERNANDEZ OSCAR R        708,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1982   1955    1088850 
50434327530003101 GOUGH NANCY D        1,068,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432753 CASA ENCANTADA CONDO 3101 0400 CONDO 1982   3433    1730400 
50434327540000011 DAVIS TERRIE A        856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000012 BLAKE CURTIS L & BLAKE PATRICIA H       856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000013 VAN PELT JANE E VAN PELT JANE E TR       806,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000014 REISS THEODORE J        856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     856800 
50434327540000021 JUDELL EILEEN W        909,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     909300 
50434327540000022 COWEN ARTHUR III &        909,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     909300 
50434327540000023 DE ARAUJO SERGIO I & SERGIO I DE ARAUJO ET AL TR HLDRS       385,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     935550 
50434327540000024 WEBB SAMUEL B JR & WEBB MARSHALL B       497,703.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     935550 
50434327540000031 STETSON JULIA T TRUST JULIA T STETSON TR       914,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     914300 
50434327540000032 UNIT 3B COCOANUT ROW LLC        914,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     914300 
50434327540000033 DOUTHIT PHILIP S &        940,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     940550 
50434327540000034 HUMPHREY MARGUERITE B        940,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     940550 
50434327540000041 GOLDSTEIN FREDERICK &        931,541.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1982   3080    1555050 
50434327540000042 MILLER EMMA G MILLER EMMA G TR       380,280.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     919300 
50434327540000043 AVERY JOHN E & AVERY CARON G       356,311.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     945550 
50434327540000051 WARNER PHILIP &        924,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     924300 
50434327540000052 MILLAS TIMI &        924,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     924300 
50434327540000053 MURPHY NORMAN E ET AL        950,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     950550 
50434327540000054 RAND GERHARD A & GERHARD RAND TR TITL HLDR       531,303.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1982   1540     950550 
50434327540000061 SIRIS LINDA        465,069.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1982   1770    1153950 
50434327540000062 DUFFAR FRANCOIS & L DUFFAR & M DUFFAR & SANDRINE DUFFAR       1,153,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432754 THREE THIRTY COCOANUT ROW CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1982   1770    1153950 
50434327550000010 DOTOLI NANCY FRANK DOTOLI C/O       117,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1984    300     117600 
50434327550000020 DOWDLE ELIZABETH D        140,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1984    361     140700 
50434327550000030 DOWDLE ELIZABETH B        455,152.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1984   1602     585900 
50434327550000060 DOTOLI NANCY        226,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1984    601     226800 
50434327550000070 FERRARA GERALDINE        39,604.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1984    322     126000 
50434327550000080 HUBBARD LYRA L        184,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432755 THREE HUNDRED ONE CHILEAN CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1984    481     184800 
50434327560000061 WYNER SHIRLEY M TR        309,601.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0061 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000062 HOPKINS RANDOLPH A & TAFFY A        216,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0062 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000063 PRESLES ANNICK D TR & HOCQUARD SOPHIE E TR       221,101.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0063 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560000064 COLLIER BARRON G II TR        153,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 0064 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001811 FRYE PROPERTIES LLC        311,101.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1811 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001812 BABYATSKY MARVIN J        196,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1812 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001821 BEACHAM HORACE E JR        337,051.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1821 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327560001822 MODESITT CHARLES C TR & MODESITT THELMA A TR       230,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432756 TWO FORTY NINE PERUVIAN COND* 1822 0460 CONDO COMM 1984      0          1 
50434327580000021 HUTTON WILLIAM E III & HUTTON LYNN S       300,420.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000022 LEHR LOUIS A JR LEHR SHERRY M       315,724.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000031 SPOTS INC        731,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327580000032 ANDREWS EDWIN C & PATRICIA S        731,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432758 LA MAINSONETTE PALM BEACH CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1985   1706     731850 
50434327620000010 DOGRAMACIYAN GARBIS        1,303,951.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0010 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000020 USHER LLC        1,167,551.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0020 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000030 MARIKO INC        1,340,301.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0030 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000040 CAJIGAS CARLOS        197,401.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0040 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000050 CAJIGAS CARLOS & CAJIGAS MICHELA PELLONI DE       416,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0050 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000060 CAJIGAS CARLOS M        542,501.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0060 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327620000070 USHER LLC        399,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432762 VIA ROMA COND*(***) 0070 0460 CONDO COMM 1986      0          1 
50434327630000000 COHN JONATHAN R TRUST &        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967      0        125 
50434327630001010 MARSTON ANTHONY C        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630001020 BURWEN NORMAN        263,952.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630001030 JACK JOAN L        176,262.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630001040 JORDAN DARLENE L        300,151.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630002010 SCOTT HAROLD B SCOTT JANE R       0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630002020 MOSELEY JEAN W JEAN W MOSELEY TR HLDR       227,249.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630002030 KING ROSALIE M        139,745.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630002040 THOMAS CLAIR A & VIRGINIA W VIRGINIA W THOMAS       399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630002050 SMITH W DEAN & SMITH BARBARA K       355,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     355950 
50434327630002060 OKEEFFE CLARE OKEEFFE CLARE TR       306,675.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     363300 
50434327630002070 MASON CARLL DOROTHY EST        449,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     449400 
50434327630002080 MARTIN GRACE B        124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     476700 
50434327630003010 WILLARD LOUISE B        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630003020 KERWIN JAMES & KERWIN SHEILA       612,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630003030 REILLY ROBERT F & REILLY MARY ANNE T       467,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630003040 REED STANLEY F JR        399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630003050 MILLS EVERETTE E III        360,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     360950 
50434327630003060 HERBERT MADELINE        368,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     368300 
50434327630003070 ASHFORTH H ADAMS        459,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     459400 
50434327630003080 KILLEN JOHN T III        124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     486700 
50434327630004010 YOUNGMAN BARBARA P        552,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     552300 
50434327630004020 GORDON CHRISTINE E        612,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     612150 
50434327630004030 CALLAHAN EDWARD W CALLAHAN EDWARD W TR       355,609.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630004040 MACHON ELIZABETH L        300,151.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630004050 KIERNAN JAMES J JR        365,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     365950 
50434327630004060 WEBB BAXTER E & ANN C ANN C WEBB       113,398.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     373300 
50434327630004070 CARTER LOUISE C        469,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     469400 
50434327630004080 LANDAU ERMINA A        496,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     496700 
50434327630005010 ODONNELL ROBERT J & ODONNELL SUE D       323,432.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1332     632300 
50434327630005020 NAVIN JOAN & NAVIN JOHN       642,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1655     692150 
50434327630005030 STETSON JOSEPHINE D        467,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1286     517650 
50434327630005040 OKEEFFE ARTHUR F TRUST OKEEFFE ARTHUR F TRUSTEE       399,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1176     399000 
50434327630005050 ATKINSON JOSEPH & KATHLEEN        370,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1184     370950 
50434327630005060 TONER MARJORIE        113,398.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1194     378300 
50434327630005070 GILLESPIE EDWARD A & GILLESPIE MARIE T       479,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1258     479400 
50434327630005080 LYNESS C VINCENT LYNESS MARY L       124,772.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1262     506700 
50434327630006010 SEZNA DAVIS G & SEZNA BARBARA       930,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2002     980700 
50434327630006020 ATKINSON JOSEPH A & KATHLEEN C ATKINSON KATHLEEN C       396,042.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2443    1121400 
50434327630006030 FRANTZ MARK G & BENTE S FRANTZ       884,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1808     884100 
50434327630006040 BRINKMANN HILKE        864,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   1817     864150 
50434327630006050 GWINN RACHEL C        321,672.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432763 THREE EIGHTY NINE CORP CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1967   2002     928200 
50434327640000000 FOUR 55 WORTH AVE CORP        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971      0        125 
50434327640001010 FOUR 55 WORTH AVE CORP        262,500.00  COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)    1971    672     262500 
50434327640002010 HODGINS WILLIAM TRUST        385,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     385350 
50434327640002020 KIBORT CHARLES A JR & KIBORT ALICE       278,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     278250 
50434327640002030 DOERR SCOTT R & GABLE CYNTHIA A       278,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     278250 
50434327640002040 SESSA GREGG V TRUST & SESSA GREGG V TR       367,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     367500 
50434327640002050 WHITE JOCELYN        266,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     266700 
50434327640002060 HARDER ROSEMARY K        266,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     266700 
50434327640002070 VIETOR NANCY        421,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     471450 
50434327640002080 FRITZ RICHARD D & ROSEMARY S        471,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     471450 
50434327640002090 ORLANDO RENE        296,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     296100 
50434327640002100 BAIN COLLEEN M        296,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     296100 
50434327640003010 MORIARTY GERTRUDE D        400,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     400350 
50434327640003020 PATCH NATHAN G        288,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     288250 
50434327640003030 SAMMONS RICHARD F & ELLETT ANNE F       288,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     288250 
50434327640003040 EKNOIAN RICHARD T        377,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     377500 
50434327640003050 FAY CLAUDIA R & FAY RICHARD       276,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     276700 
50434327640003060 WILKINSON VIRGINIA E        276,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971    766     276700 
50434327640003070 HELLRIGL MARIA P        251,912.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     491450 
50434327640003080 NUISSL ANNA M G HAMILTON C/O       491,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA) 1 0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     491450 
50434327640003090 PHILLIPS BRICE R TR        473,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1532     473550 
50434327640004010 SAGE HENRY W JR        84,536.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     415350 
50434327640004020 KREUSLER JANE C        298,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     298250 
50434327640004030 WALSH MICHAEL P & KREUSLER WALSH JANE       298,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     298250 
50434327640004040 PHILLIPS BRICE R & SHIRLEY E        387,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1047     387500 
50434327640004050 MENGONI FRED        286,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     286700 
50434327640004060 ANDREWS EDWARD B & ANDREWS MARSHA B       286,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     286700 
50434327640004070 WATTS BRUCE R & WATTS SUSAN B       511,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     511450 
50434327640004080 HEVENER MARY B        511,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971   1499     511450 
50434327640004090 VEASY JOHN P        104,566.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     326100 
50434327640004100 WALLACH FREDERICK E & HEVENER MARY H       326,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432764 FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE CO-OP (RIVIERA)  0510 CO-OP 1971    766     326100 
50434327650000000 LAKE DRIVE CO OP APTS INC        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1974      0        125 
50434327650002010 STIBOLT CARL B        223,980.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     279300 
50434327650002020 PHIPPS HUBERT G        304,320.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     361200 
50434327650002030 BUCKNER CAROLE C ET AL        232,919.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     361200 
50434327650002040 STIBOLT CARL B        358,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     358050 
50434327650002050 BOWERS JAMES R & BOWERS PATRICIA BRYANT       358,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     358050 
50434327650002060 MAJOR HOWARD B JR        102,880.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     627900 
50434327650002070 KOLLOCK MARJORIE A TRUST DONOHUE F SCOTT TR       144,741.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     712950 
50434327650002080 NYHEIM JOHN A &        279,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     279300 
50434327650003010 WALLACE JULIA        284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650003020 KIBORT CHARLES A & KIBORT ALICE       245,604.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     371200 
50434327650003030 GRAINGER ROBERT T        371,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     371200 
50434327650003040 OXNAM JAMES W        368,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     368050 
50434327650003050 RUGER CHARLES &        368,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     368050 
50434327650003060 EMANUELSON DWIGHT H &        647,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     647900 
50434327650003070 FORREST ROBERT FORREST ROBERT TRUST       244,517.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     732950 
50434327650003080 KIBORT CHARLES A & KIBORT ALICE       284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650004010 SHEERAN JAMES J        284,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     284300 
50434327650004020 MILLER COURTLANDT & MILLER GINA       249,028.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1204     381200 
50434327650004030 SCHONBEK CHARLOTTE        667,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     667900 
50434327650004040 WILLIS F GORDON & WILLIS KATHERINE F       251,216.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     378050 
50434327650004050 PHELAN MARY C        328,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1096     378050 
50434327650004060 MADDEN EDWARD E        617,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1974   1357     667900 
50434327650004070 FREDRICKS JOAN        170,880.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1974   1554     752950 
50434327650004080 SHEERAN JAMES EST        89,036.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432765 LAKE DRIVE APTS INC CO-OP 408 0510 CO-OP 1974    837     289300 
50434327660000000 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1970      0        125 
50434327660000010 BRINCKERHOFF SIDNEY B TRUSTEE        417,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     417900 
50434327660000020 BRINCKERHOFF NATALIE G        287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000030 BRINCKERHOFF NATALIE G        362,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     412650 
50434327660000040 VAKOUTIS JOHN &        274,052.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     417900 
50434327660000050 SCHULER WILLAIM C & SCHULER BARBARA J       287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000060 SCHULER WILLIAM C        68,244.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     412650 
50434327660000070 PRICE KATHRYN K        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000080 PRICE HENRY A TRUST        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000090 DIFILIPPO NANDO EST        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000100 SANDERS VERONICA H        48,224.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    750     310800 
50434327660000110 FRIZZELL ALBERT T TRUST        287,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     287700 
50434327660000120 CORBIN ROBERT E & CORBIN JANET G       83,235.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000140 FRIZZELL ALBERT T TRUST        371,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000150 SOUTH LAKE NOMINEE TRUST HIRSCH STEVEN N TRUSTEE       274,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    600     274050 
50434327660000160 MILLER EDGAR        371,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     371700 
50434327660000170 TENHAVE ROBERT & TENHAVE ELIZABETH C       366,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432766 NASSAU SQUARE APTS INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1970    928     366450 
50434327670000000 PARK PLACE INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961      0        125 
50434327670001030 MEJIA MARGARET H & MEJIA ALBERTO       805,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1960     825300 
50434327670001040 GARCIA ELIZABETH A        648,450.00  COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 104 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     618450 
50434327670001050 REED PHYLLIS A REED PHYLLIS A TR       181,018.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     767550 
50434327670001060 LEE ROBERT E & LEE ELAINE       340,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1160     375900 
50434327670001070 CARABASI RALPH & HELEN T CARABASI HELEN T       179,720.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     534450 
50434327670001080 POHANKA JOHN J POHANKA LYNN T       525,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     525000 
50434327670002010 TESE JOYCE        999,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271     999600 
50434327670002020 SCHMIDLAPP PATRICIA K        1,140,227.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2463    1158150 
50434327670002040 WILLIAMSON DOUGLAS F JR & WILLIAMSON BARBARA T       336,503.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     653100 
50434327670002050 SCHOFIELD ROBERT H & BARBARA P        702,655.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     782550 
50434327670002060 MONTOURI WARREN KENDALL MONTOURI WARREN K TR       762,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     782550 
50434327670002070 COOK KEVIT R & COOK GAIL F       494,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     544450 
50434327670002080 KIRSTEN JOACHIM R &        485,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     535000 
50434327670003010 PORTER GRANT & PORTER CHRISTINA       1,014,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271    1014600 
50434327670003020 TOTH MICHAEL C        434,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961    988     374850 
50434327670003030 HARPER ROBERT H TRUST HARPER ROBERT H TR       666,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1475     606900 
50434327670003040 NYHEIM JOHN A        683,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     673100 
50434327670003050 GOOTRAD HAROLD & GOOTRAD ROBERTA       857,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     797550 
50434327670003060 JENKINS BENJAMIN P III & JENKINS MARIANNE W       827,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     797550 
50434327670003070 LEAHEY MARY J        369,249.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     554450 
50434327670003080 JANKOWSKY JOEL &        545,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     545000 
50434327670004010 PILKINGTON ROBERT & PILKINGTON HELEN       914,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271     914550 
50434327670004020 VINTON LOUISE        444,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961    988     384850 
50434327670004030 HICKLIN HALLIE H MORGENS L C/O       686,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1475     626900 
50434327670004040 JENNINGS JOHN L & ROBERTA B JENNINGS ROBERTA B       181,018.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     693100 
50434327670004050 PRESTON GLADYS P        872,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     812550 
50434327670004060 HARRIS CAMERON M & DOROTHY W        1,390,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   3240    1360800 
50434327670004080 MATTHEWS BETSY K &        555,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     555000 
50434327670005010 PILKINGTON ROBERT TR        1,044,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2271    1044600 
50434327670005020 CURRIE L RODGER & PATRICIA CURRIE PATRICIA       104,444.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1349     562800 
50434327670005030 DARLINGTON HENRY JR        507,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1114     447300 
50434327670005040 STEERE BRUCE M        301,582.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1570     713100 
50434327670005050 VANBUREN ROBERT VANBUREN ROBERT TR       209,896.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     827550 
50434327670005060 BRADSHAW PATRICIA PATRICIA BRADSHAW ET AL TR HLDRS       807,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1655     827550 
50434327670005070 PALAMAD DEV CORP        574,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1585     574450 
50434327670005080 MOORE MARTHA B        126,008.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1460     565000 
50434327670006010 CLEARY BARBARA M & BARBARA & JAMES CLEARY ET AL TR HLDRS       979,642.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2897    1424850 
50434327670006020 EPPIG RUTH S        1,150,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1908    1090950 
50434327670006030 SETTLE W SYDNOR        972,628.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   2916    1296750 
50434327670006040 FLANAGAN JOSEPH P & FLANAGAN CAROL O       451,042.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432767 PARK PLACE INC CO-OP 1 0510 CO-OP 1961   1272     675150 
50434327680000000 VILLAS INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1971      0        125 
50434327680002010 BAXTER GEORGE W SR & BAXTER GEORGE W SR TR TITL HLDR       1,508,287.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2258550 
50434327680002020 GADD SARA R        1,357,871.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1873200 
50434327680002030 KEANE MARILYN T TR        1,781,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1781850 
50434327680002040 BAGLEY ANYA S BAGLEY ANYA S TR       1,470,810.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1781850 
50434327680002050 CAY JOHN E III CAY JOHN E III TR       1,358,371.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1873200 
50434327680002060 SCHULER JOHN H & SCHULER ELIZABETH L       1,708,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 2060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2258550 
50434327680003010 DEMATTEIS NANCY        2,258,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2308550 
50434327680003020 ARMSTRONG ANDREW J ANDREW J ARMSTRONG TR TITL HLDR       1,581,520.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1923200 
50434327680003030 GREENE WILLIAM B JR        1,831,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1831850 
50434327680003040 BAIN COLLEEN        636,314.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP A03D 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1831850 
50434327680003050 MCLAUGHLIN MARCELLA K TR        1,923,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1923200 
50434327680003060 FERRIN BARBARA        817,185.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 3060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2308550 
50434327680004010 GRANT ADELE R        2,358,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2358550 
50434327680004020 THE VILLAS (BAHAMAS) LTD HARRY P OAKES C/O       1,973,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1973200 
50434327680004030 KELLOGG CYNTHIA &        1,881,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1881850 
50434327680004040 MIANO JOYCE L        1,881,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1881850 
50434327680004050 BERNARD EUGENE L TRUSTEE        724,111.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    1973200 
50434327680004060 LEWINTON CHRISTOPHER & LEWINTON LOUISE       2,358,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 4060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2358550 
50434327680005010 PHILLIPS SARAH B        2,408,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5010 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2408550 
50434327680005020 COOK PATRICIA L        1,684,520.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5020 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    2023200 
50434327680005030 KESSELER H J & SALLY KESSELER SALLY       690,294.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5030 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1931850 
50434327680005040 RCM JSM TRUST & MCNAIR ROBERT C TR       1,931,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5040 0510 CO-OP 1971   2536    1931850 
50434327680005050 HAMILTON ANITA J HAMILTON ANITA J TR       1,516,733.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5050 0510 CO-OP 1971   2762    2023200 
50434327680005060 OLSON FRANK A & OLSON SARAH J       2,408,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 5060 0510 CO-OP 1971   3232    2408550 
50434327680006010 PICKETT JOHN O & PICKETT ROBIN R       3,808,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6010 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327680006020 OHERRON KENNEDY C &        3,858,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6020 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327680006030 ALBERT ULF L        1,121,418.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043432768 VILLAS INC CO-OP 6030 0510 CO-OP 1971   4800    3858750 
50434327690000010 LOVE III        745,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000020 KASSATLY EDWARD & ROBERT KASSATLY TRS       1,000,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000030 MANCHESTER REALTY GROUP        735,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327690000040 MANHATTAN CORP LOVE REALTY C/O       690,000.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432769 VIA LELA OF WORTH AVE COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1987      0          1 
50434327700010000 PANOBIANCO GIUSEPPE        1,565,083.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1950 00 03 01 2     244774       4198       4296       4156                 
50434327700010000 PANOBIANCO GIUSEPPE        1,565,083.00 0.14 MFR <10 UNITS 1927 1950 00 03 01 2     244774       4198       4296       4156                 
50434327710010010 VIA MIZNER SOUTH REALTY TRUST IACOI JOHN M TR       4,140,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   7853    4140000 
50434327710010020 VIA MIZNER ASSOCIATES LTD PARTNERSHIP        342,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991    890     342000 
50434327710010030 KEAN IAN M        302,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991    788     302000 
50434327710011010 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,357,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1991      0          1 
50434327710011020 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        880,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011030 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        788,401.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011040 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        817,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011050 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        235,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011060 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        230,301.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011070 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        235,201.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011080 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        585,901.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011090 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        277,901.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011100 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        231,701.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011110 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        345,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011120 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        189,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011140 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        301,701.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011150 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        555,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011160 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        443,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011170 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        562,101.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011180 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,065,601.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011190 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        852,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710011200 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        848,401.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012080 ANGLO AMERICAN HOLDINGS INC        1,061,911.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012160 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        1,204,981.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012170 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        332,311.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012180 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        286,771.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710012190 VIA MIZNER ASSOC LTD        572,221.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710020010 ARGON L C        832,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   2337     832000 
50434327710020020 MAASS ROBB R & MAASS ELIZABETH T       591,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0400 CONDO 1991   1605     591000 
50434327710021010 ARGON L C        205,921.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021020 ARGON L C        186,721.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021030 ARGON L C        229,441.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021040 BLACK GRETCHEN B BARZINA C/O       137,761.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021050 BLACK GRETCHEN B BARZINA C/O       148,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021060 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        384,481.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021070 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        240,961.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021080 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        288,481.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021090 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        503,491.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021100 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        684,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021110 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        341,281.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021120 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        160,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021140 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        136,801.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710021150 CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR        420,961.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327710022010 ARGON L C        366,861.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432771 VIA MIZNER NORTH & SOUTH COND*  0460 CONDO COMM 1925      0          1 
50434327720000010 WRIGHT ROBERT W & ROBERT WRIGHT TR TITL HLDR       935,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924   1709     985000 
50434327720000020 GALIN ROBERT & GALIN PENELOPE       330,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    845     380000 
50434327720000030 BENAFIELD DENA TRUST BENAFIELD DENA TR       392,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    861     392000 
50434327720000040 HARVELL JAMES C JR &        335,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432772 CASA VILLAGGIO CONDO ***  0400 CONDO 1924    470     335000 
50434327730000010 CAMOGE INC        740,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 1 0400 CONDO 1994   1349     740250 
50434327730000020 HOLDER DOUGLAS A SR &        697,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 2 0400 CONDO 1994   1261     697200 
50434327730000030 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       1,035,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO 3 0400 CONDO 1994   1582    1035300 
50434327730010010 HOLDER DOUGLAS A SR &        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010020 CLARK JAMES MCCONNELL        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010030 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010040 MESTANAS G NICHOLAS & MESTANAS NICOLE       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010050 WRIGHT ROBERT W & WRIGHT SUSAN C       26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327730010060 GALIN ROBERT        26,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432773 LAS ALDEAS CONDO  0400 CONDO 1994      0      26250 
50434327740000010 KIMSEY STEPHEN P & KIMSEY MIRIAM O       1,231,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432774 VILLA FIORENTINA CONDO  0400 CONDO 1996   1678    1231650 
50434327740000020 PUNNETT R JOHN        1,051,380.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432774 VILLA FIORENTINA CONDO  0400 CONDO 1996   1678    1231650 
50434327750000030 BRYANT PATRICIA K BRYANT PATRICIA K TR       31,810.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 0003 0400 CONDO 1968    654     376950 
50434327750000040 OTTINGER KAY & ROY J ROBERTSON C/O       84,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 0004 0400 CONDO 1968    599      84000 
50434327750000050 WHITE THOMAS P JR WHITE TECLA       298,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 5 0400 CONDO 1968    507     298200 
50434327750000060 MESSINA TONY        31,810.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 6 0400 CONDO 1968    738     426300 
50434327750000070 BOLDIN WIENERT K        414,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 7 0400 CONDO 1968    719     414750 
50434327750001010 GRAHAM MICHAEL        696,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 101 0400 CONDO 1968    840     696150 
50434327750001030 GRAHAM MICHAEL        348,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 103 0400 CONDO 1968    840     348600 
50434327750002010 ODONNELL ROBERT J ODONNELL SUE D       706,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 201 0400 CONDO 1968    840     706150 
50434327750002030 GOOCH JOHN H        191,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 203 0400 CONDO 1968    420     191100 
50434327750002040 GOOCH JOHN H        191,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO 204 0400 CONDO 1968    420     191100 
50434327750003010 HILLIARD MARY MYERS        1,145,077.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432775 CASA DEL LAGO CONDO PH 0400 CONDO 1968   1973    1222200 
50434327770000021 BLICK ANNETTE        641,130.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     738000 
50434327770000022 HOFFMAN HOWARD &        723,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     723000 
50434327770000023 HOWLAND NANCY LYLE        723,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     723000 
50434327770000024 SIAM INC        738,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 2D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     738000 
50434327770000031 MCCOUN GORDON W & NAPOLEON BLANCHE       748,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     748000 
50434327770000032 MILLNER DIANE E        343,258.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     733000 
50434327770000033 HOUSER W TODD &        733,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     733000 
50434327770000034 GAST ZDENKA        748,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 3D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     748000 
50434327770000041 SASSER JAMES R TR & SASSER MARY B TR       758,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     758000 
50434327770000042 HOWLAND NANCY LYLE        743,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     743000 
50434327770000043 BOURNE INVESTMENTS INC        743,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     743000 
50434327770000044 HARTZ JOHN C JR        454,564.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 4D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     758000 
50434327770000051 OAKLEY J ANNETTE        768,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     768000 
50434327770000052 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TRUST WINIFRED C HEAVEY TR       753,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     753000 
50434327770000053 HEAVEY WINIFRED C TRUST WINIFRED C HEAVEY TR       753,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     753000 
50434327770000054 PRATT ROBERT K & PRATT MONICA M       768,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 5D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     768000 
50434327770000061 PERKINS FRED F        810,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6A 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     810000 
50434327770000062 ASSAD RAMZI T LIVING TRUST        784,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6B 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     784000 
50434327770000063 RIZZO FRANK & PALERMO JOANNE       784,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6C 0400 CONDO 1980   1316     784000 
50434327770000064 CROWE ROBERT B        810,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 6D 0400 CONDO 1980   1293     810000 
50434327770000071 GLASSER RICHARD S & GLASSER MARTHA M       1,208,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 7A 0400 CONDO 1980   1516    1208000 
50434327770000072 GEORGIUS JOHN R GEORGIUS JOHN R TR       1,172,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432777 ELIOT HOUSE CONDO*** 7B 0400 CONDO 1980   1523    1222000 
50434327780000010 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        4,990,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) CU-1 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780000020 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,600,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) CU-2 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780000080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,150,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) HU 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001000 KIMRON DANIELA        310,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-100 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001010 FORTIN ENTERPRISES INC        635,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-101 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001020 SUITE 102 LLC MURIEL F SIEBERT C/O       478,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-102 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001030 GREENBAUM THOMAS E        634,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-103 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001040 LEVINE NOEL & LEVINE HARRIETTE       887,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-104 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001050 FJA1 LLC        380,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-105 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001060 LEVINE NOEL & LEVINE HARRIETTE       392,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-106 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001070 GALLAGHER NANCY Q        453,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-107 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        382,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-108 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001082 RUDOLPH DANIEL J TR & RUDOLPH DONNA J  TR       342,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-108B 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001090 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,133,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-109 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001100 CRAFT PHILIP C        323,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-110 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001110 CDS BRAZILIAN COURT LLC        1,328,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-112 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001130 MODEL BENNETT        312,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-113 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001140 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        654,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-114 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001150 CULLMAN LEWIS B        1,753,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-115 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001160 PATI H GERBER 1997 TRUST        1,366,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-116 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001170 APPLEGATE L THOMAS & APPLEGATE CATHLEEN H       1,818,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-117 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001180 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,163,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-118 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001190 DANZIGER GIGI GUGGENHEIM        331,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-119 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001200 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        320,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-120 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001210 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        316,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-121 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001220 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        629,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-122 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001230 GRENIER BART A        561,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-123 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001240 STROM KATHRYN CAREY        348,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-124 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001250 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        362,001.00 3 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001280 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        867,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-128 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001290 POPOWICH DAVID & POPOWICH LORRAINE       1,459,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-129 0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780001300 KRASNOW ROBERT & KRASNOW FAITH       596,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-130 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001310 ASTROP WILLIAM B & ASTROP JEAN T       599,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-131 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780001320 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        438,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-132 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002010 BC 201 LLC        946,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002020 FJELDSTAD KATHERINE        435,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002030 CHEUNG CHIEH T & LIN HELEN       626,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002040 CERADINI KAREN LENARD THYLAN C/O       361,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002042 TANG ZHICHUN & SHIA JINRU       420,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002050 CHEUNG CHIEH T & LIN HELEN       389,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002060 DONEGAN MICHAEL C & SHEYBANI MANDANA       316,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002070 DINOSAUR PARTNERS BC LLC        457,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780002080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,218,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-208 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002090 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,198,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-209 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002100 KLEINHANDLER DAVID M & KRIEGER MITCHELL       305,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-210 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002110 KUROSU KATSUYUKI & C/O HIDEKO HORIGUCHI       619,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-211 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002120 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        608,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-212 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002130 SINHA ROBIN KUMAR        309,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-213 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002140 FAIRFAX & SAMMONS INVESTMENTS LLC        306,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-214 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002150 SCHWARTZ MERCEDES E        333,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-215 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002160 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,754,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-216 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002170 DEVIVO MICHAEL & DEVIVO GINGER       575,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-217 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002180 BARDWIL JAMES A        572,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-218 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002190 ZOUMAS ASPASIA        639,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-219 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002200 TRENK ALVIN S        651,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-220 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002210 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        680,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-221 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002212 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        418,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 321B 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002213 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        361,001.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 221C 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002220 ROTTIER ERIC & ROTTIER NORA       334,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-222 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002230 DEMELIO KAREN L        361,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-223 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002240 GOODMAN MARJORIE A        310,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-224 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002250 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        594,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-225 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002260 RICCIARDI MICHAEL & RICCIARDI GINA       566,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-226 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002270 GORDON LARRY & GORDON JANET       334,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-227 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002280 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        864,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-228 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002290 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        1,302,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-229 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002300 MULLANEY R RYAN JR & MULLANEY SUSAN S       661,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-230 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002310 SPRINGFED LLC        659,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-231 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002320 GUGGENHEIM DAVID S & GUGGENHEIM SHERRI       558,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-232 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002330 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        353,601.00 0 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) 233 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002340 DAY NATHANIEL B & DAY LUCY R       1,686,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-234 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002350 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        983,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-235 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002360 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        839,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-236 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780002370 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        838,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-237 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003010 GM PROPERTIES LLC        1,024,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003020 WHEELOCK MORGAN D & WHEELOCK JUDITH       598,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003030 BAYHOMES HOLDINGS LLC        563,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003040 BENK PAUL & BENK LAURIE L       563,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003050 WIENER LYNN        328,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***)  0460 CONDO COMM 1935      0          1 
50434327780003060 MARCUS KRYSTAL TR & MARCUS JUDY TR       292,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-306 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003070 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        296,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-307 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003080 CSC BRAZILIAN LP        296,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-308 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327780003090 GAYNOR VERE        301,001.00 1 CONDO COMMERCIAL                   5043432778 BRAZILIAN COURT HOTEL AND CONDO * (***) RU-309 0460 CONDO COMM 1926      0          1 
50434327800003260 STUART-FINDLAY CLIVE        1,200,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432780 CHILEAN CONDOMINIUM OF PALM BEACH***  0400 CONDO 1924   2184    1200000 
50434327800003280 DRENNEN DANIEL E        1,150,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043432780 CHILEAN CONDOMINIUM OF PALM BEACH***  0400 CONDO 1924   2184    1200000 
50434334000050010 PALM BEACH TOWN OF LESSOR NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC LESSEE       0.00 40.9 MUNICIPAL                           
50434334000050020 NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC PATRICIA DOUGLAS C/O       0.00 79 VACANT INSTIT                           
50434335000010010 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       1,727,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 01 02 00 2      74092        582        625        482                 
50434335000010010 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       1,727,349.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 03 03 01 2     491145       3050       3117       3033                 
50434335000010020 TIGGES PETER &        8,767,724.00 1.4212 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 05 07 01 2    1969477       9555      10819       8630                 
50434335000010020 TIGGES PETER &        8,767,724.00 1.4212 SINGLE FAMILY 1933 1965 04 05 01 1     360165       6463       6918       5767                 
50434335000010030 RAPAPORT ROBERT D & COBEY W COBEY W RAPAPORT       7,739,427.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1998 00 05 01 2    6061909      15485      17137      14300                 
50434335000010040 SCHLESINGER RICHARD & LESLIE        25,535,705.00 2.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 11 01 3    2575870      14883      21534      12304                 
50434335000010040 SCHLESINGER RICHARD & LESLIE        25,535,705.00 2.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1990 1990 00 01 00 1      96093        852       1654          1                 
50434335000010060 FALCONE EDWARD        7,191,583.00 0.94 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 08 01 3    1633806       9770      11208       8863                 
50434335000010060 FALCONE EDWARD        7,191,583.00 0.94 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1980 01 02 00 1      78987        972       1020        900                 
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1946 2003 05 07 01 2    1594675       6551       7023       6056                 
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1947 1995 01 01 00 1      76972        500        500        500                 
50434335000010080 REWEY ROBERT L JR REWEY SUZANNE L       6,154,144.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 03 03 00 2     576320       2393       2592       2326                 
50434335000010090 822 S COUNTY LLC        12,084,294.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 2000 05 06 01 2    1918063       9341       9704       8967                 
50434335000010090 822 S COUNTY LLC        12,084,294.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 02 03 00 1     481896       2413       2967       2039                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1980 01 01 01 2      44010        469        552        276                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1980 02 01 00 1      97674        988       1175        550                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 2000 05 07 01 2    4458928      10782      13022       9952                 
50434335000010100 SOLIMINE EMIL &        12,523,185.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1997 00 02 00 1      67727        563        937          1                 
50434335000010110 VENTO GERALD & VENTO MARGARET       16,015,438.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 10 01 3    6523515      20606      23526      17424                 
50434335000010120 ROYCE CHARLES M & ROYCE DEBORAH G       6,529,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1980 04 05 01 2    2376011       5530       6055       4714                 
50434335000010120 ROYCE CHARLES M & ROYCE DEBORAH G       6,529,963.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1973 01 02 00 2     119243        849       1059        750                 
50434335000010130 RAQUET WALTER & RAQUET NANCY       10,017,424.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1967 00 01 00 2     123710       1548       1885        760                 
50434335000010130 RAQUET WALTER & RAQUET NANCY       10,017,424.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1994 05 08 01 2    3093335      12681      16401      11830                 
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1942 02 02 00 1      38104        612        760        494                 
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1942 02 02 00 1      79096       1246       1472        720                 
50434335000010150 FURLO LOUIS J JR & P W FURLO & C J FURLO TRS       14,464,748.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1985 05 07 01 2    2533362       9854      11692       8295                 
50434335000010160 BILOTTI MARGARET S        4,289,855.00 1.1614 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1996 05 06 01 2    2708314       9775      11214       8581                 
50434335000010160 BILOTTI MARGARET S        4,289,855.00 1.1614 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1996 02 01 00 1     121699       1426       1426       1426                 
50434335000010180 204 VIA DEL MAR LLC        4,025,000.00 0 VACANT                           
50434335000010190 VECELLIO LEO A JR & VECELLIO KATHRYN C       8,179,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1996 00 02 00 1     104598        793       1021        391                 
50434335000010190 VECELLIO LEO A JR & VECELLIO KATHRYN C       8,179,516.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1996 05 06 01 3    2426262       9091      11094       8110                 
50434335000010200 MOENS LAWRENCE A        2,686,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2000 04 05 01 3     218482       6583       8210       5800                 
50434335000010200 MOENS LAWRENCE A        2,686,604.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2000 02 03 00 1     311162       2125       2835       1540                 
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1942 02 02 00 2     151771       2776       3384       2178                 
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1942 01 02 00 1      79785       1328       1664        736                 
50434335000010210 ISABEL COLLIER TRUST COLLIER BARRON G II TR       4,822,190.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1936 1965 05 08 01 2    1100557      10995      11443      10171                 
50434335000010220 CAFARO JOHN J  FAMILY TRUST CAFARO JOHN J TRUSTEE       14,503,945.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2001 05 08 01 3    1281226      17040      24332      14258                 
50434335000010250 BECKER CHARLES E TR        15,989,690.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1999 05 10 00 2    7814168      15269      22253      13171                 
50434335000010260 TOMSICH ROBERT J TR        9,077,296.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1998 01 01 00 1      73252        539        828         60                 
50434335000010260 TOMSICH ROBERT J TR        9,077,296.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1998 05 11 01 2    3750651      17446      21576      13826                 
50434335000010270 TOMSICH ROBERT J        2,875,000.00 0.45 VACANT                           
50434335000010280 PASHCOW JOEL        6,635,383.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2001 04 05 01 2    3274529       8149       9758       7068                 
50434335000010290 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        3,842,565.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1970 05 07 00 2    1534622       6921       7418       6528                 
50434335000010300 LICHTENBAUM JOYCE M & SUSAN B LICHTENBAUM TRS       2,396,949.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1940 1970 02 03 00 1       6099       1604       1642       1587                 
50434335000010310 TELESCO DOMINICK & SUSAN SUSAN TELESCO       2,949,309.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 02 02 00 1     107477       1591       1872        936                 
50434335000010310 TELESCO DOMINICK & SUSAN SUSAN TELESCO       2,949,309.00 1.3 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 2000 05 11 00 2    2762840      12450      13626      11659                 
50434335000010320 ROWAN RENA        2,362,040.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1947 01 01 00 1      77353       1334       1334       1334                 
50434335000010320 ROWAN RENA        2,362,040.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1992 04 05 00 2    1935958       5901       6555       5186                 
50434335000010330 FLYNN MICHAEL & FLYNN ANNE       4,065,159.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1990 05 10 00 2    1488665       8802      10125       7804                 
50434335000010340 DAVIS JUNE R        1,011,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1937 04 05 01 2     463638       6808       7206       6674                 
50434335000010340 DAVIS JUNE R        1,011,081.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1930 1948 02 02 00 1      78002       1252       1832        752                 
50434335000010350 260 VIA BELLARIA LLC        8,276,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1995 05 07 01 2     905720       9104      12272       6873                 
50434335000010350 260 VIA BELLARIA LLC        8,276,033.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1990 03 01 00 1     105625       1260       1512        672                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1942 02 02 01 2      84134       1290       1518        759                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1985 05 11 00 3    5881318      16521      20051      15604                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1999 02 02 00 1     256781       2635       2661       2597                 
50434335000010370 TAYLOR TERRY R & TAYLOR CYNTHIA E       26,013,851.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 01 00 2     173884       1871       2575        928                 
50434335000010390 STEVE & LINDA HORN INC        690,000.00 0.1 VACANT                           
50434335000010400 GREENBAUM RYNA        6,180,922.00 0.5 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 07 01 2    3842188       7419       8919       6532                 
50434335000010410 DANKIN DOROTHY F & DOROTHY F DANKIN TRUST       2,200,961.00 0.42 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1955 05 08 00 2    1291559       7234       7535       6868                 
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 1967 1998 03 03 01 1     258203       2677       2957       2557                 
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 08 09 04 3   12987054      30437      42196      20543                 
50434335000010420 KOCH WILLIAM I        26,996,777.00 3.9095 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 01 01 00      215153       1816       3044        627                 
50434335000020010 CHOPIN L FRANK CHOPIN L FRANK TR       4,015,799.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1985 02 01 01 1     172437       2171       3592       1677                 
50434335000020020 ROLLNICK WILLIAM        3,339,319.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 04 01 2     884291       4926       5601       4353                 
50434335000020020 ROLLNICK WILLIAM        3,339,319.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1994 00 02 00 2     140563       1100       1216       1050                 
50434335000020030 MONELL EDMUND C JR & TERRY T TERRY T MONELL       1,349,196.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1980 03 03 01 1     366038       3591       3777       3197                 
50434335000020040 POWER RICHARD & POWER MARIA       7,727,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1999 05 06 01 2    4905716       9503      11392       8698                 
50434335000020040 POWER RICHARD & POWER MARIA       7,727,364.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1993 1993 00 02 00 2      94461        994       1249        573                 
50434335000020050 TIEFEL WILLIAM R &        1,917,327.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 05 06 01 2     922515       8969       9425       8512                 
50434335000020060 YOUNG ANNE R        1,505,598.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 02 02 00 2     131898       1369       1803        776                 
50434335000020060 YOUNG ANNE R        1,505,598.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 03 03 01 1     199993       3186       3259       2895                 
50434335000020070 SCAIFE FRANCES G        2,330,070.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1950 04 05 01 2      20367       6166       7156       5062                 
50434335000020080 SCAIFE FRANCES G        2,698,394.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 04 06 01 1     699836       5176       5745       4289                 
50434335000020090 CONRAD MARY S        3,480,381.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 03 03 00 1     324191       4281       4407       4035                 
50434335000020100 SMITH HAROLD B NORTHERN TRUST CO TR       6,147,452.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 1980 05 07 01 2    3187541      10614      11660       8952                 
50434335000020110 MENDEL NANCY W        2,985,943.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 04 04 01 2     674560       4989       5540       4224                 
50434335000020120 SCAIFE JENNIE K VEGOSEN DEAN TR       6,555,916.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1990 04 09 00 1    1219433       6879       8425       5517                 
50434335000020120 SCAIFE JENNIE K VEGOSEN DEAN TR       6,555,916.00 0.55 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1990 01 01 00 1     103749       1074       1978        209                 
50434335000020140 BORISLOW DANIEL & BORISLOW MICHELE       8,290,578.00 0.9393 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 05 02 2      49124       7743       8988       6263                 
50434335000020150 JACK KARIN        6,191,314.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1991 05 06 01 2    1277310       7487       8048       6736                 
50434335000020170 FOGG NITA S        1,367,286.00 0.51 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 04 00 1     838189       4072       5001       3372                 
50434335000020180 DEITCHER JONATHAN RBC DOMINION SECURITIES C/O       3,518,382.00 0.93 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 1      23883       3574       4032       2746                 
50434335000020190 TOLLMAN BEATRICE        10,958,299.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1934 1954 05 14 01 2     203952      17160      18554      15241                 
50434335000020200 FEICK STUART E        938,893.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1975 04 04 01 2      74513       4347       4649       3859                 
50434335000020201 GOLDNER NORBERT & GOLDNER LIDIA       2,772,325.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1990 03 03 01 1     724390       4264       4919       3613                 
50434335000020220 PORRECA VANESSA        3,846,298.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1976 1982 05 06 01 1    1331894       7129       7542       6426                 
50434335000020230 HARUVI ABE & HARUVI GIOVANA       3,547,428.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1985 03 03 01 1     662903       5681       6453       3996                 
50434335000020240 LIND GERARD G & CAROLYN R LIND CAROLYN R       814,098.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1952 03 03 01 1     319222       3847       4042       3545                 
50434335000020250 BITTON SALOMON &        2,811,877.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 05 06 01 1     248651       6003       7633       4915                 
50434335000020260 HUNT VICTORIA HUNT RECTOR S III       2,879,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 04 04 01 2    1170747       5410       5956       4848                 
50434335000020270 GOSSETT W TED        3,371,256.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 04 01 1     531407       4438       4723       3779                 
50434335000020280 YSC FLORIDA LLC        12,806,925.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1995 05 07 01 2    3733187       7065       8151       5997                 
50434335000020290 RANK PROPERTIES        3,406,906.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1960 05 07 00 2    1095038       7220       7593       6676                 
50434335000020300 CARSON CREEK CORP CITCO BVI LTD C/O       2,593,857.00 0.44 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1980 03 03 00 1     276893       3068       3284       2344                 
50434335000020310 VAUGHN CLOTHER H & JOYCE E VAUGHN JOYCE E       597,180.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 03 03 01 1     240582       2799       2930       2493                 
50434335000020320 ANDERSON ALBIN F        895,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1952 01 01 00 1      81951       1149       1352        676                 
50434335000020320 ANDERSON ALBIN F        895,876.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1965 00 03 00 1     112176       2710       2811       2666                 
50434335000020330 MADOFF MARION MADOFF BERNARD C/O       4,248,147.00 0.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1995 00 05 00 1    1137747       6261       7373       5473                 
50434335000020340 MANDELL RONALD B        1,421,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1985 01 01 00 1      95503        931        931        931                 
50434335000020340 MANDELL RONALD B        1,421,947.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1990 04 04 01 2     729081       4135       4452       3772                 
50434335000020360 ILYINSKY ANGELICA K        4,578,973.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 05 07 01 2    1402299       7428       7774       6618                 
50434335000020370 GOODRICH FLORIDA REALTY TRUST HINES EDWARD F JR TR       7,358,678.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 05 05 01 2     515846       6021       6322       5654                 
50434335000020380 GUNDLACH HEINZ L GUNDLACH HEINZ L TR       652,769.00 0.36 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1990 03 04 00 1     407932       4440       4615       4136                 
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1927 1965 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1123000      37414         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      35850        414         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      43610        624         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1954 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     114200       1870         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1961 1975 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      68750       2534         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1962 1990 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     104140       1608         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1963 1990 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     177550       1968         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1997 1997 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     104610        660         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     469150       2252         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS    1101660       5042         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2004 2004 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF    3437540      17374         
50434335000020390 MAR A LAGO CLUB INC DIRECTOR OF FINANCE C/O OCEAN 002 1100  S OCEAN BLVD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 20,000,000.00 17.2053 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           2005 2005 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     567490       5061         
50434335000020391 BARRY MARYANNE         0.16 VACANT                           
50434335000020410 FIRST ALLIED JAX CORP         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1985 05 06 01 2     116541       9336      10754       8312                 
50434335000020410 FIRST ALLIED JAX CORP         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1990 00 02 00 2       5645        991       1042        928                 
50434335000020430 LEHMANN GUNTHER H 1ST NATIONAL PAYMENT SERVICES C/O        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 05 05 01 1    2216067       6293       7026       5702                 
50434335000020440 SCHMEELK RICHARD J &         0.65 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 2002 05 06 01 2    1637919       7164       7666       6652                 
50434335010000010 KURTZ RICHARD THE KAMSON CORP C/O        0 VACANT                           
50434335010000020 OKEAN PAUL Z         0.64 SINGLE FAMILY 1942 1980 04 04 01 1     787647       4418       4562       3987                 
50434335010000031 DONNELLEY THORNE B & MONNIE B DONNELLEY THORNE B        0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1955 00 01 00 2      69167        823        968        484                 
50434335010000031 DONNELLEY THORNE B & MONNIE B DONNELLEY THORNE B        0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 04 07 00 2     731859       5121       5356       5076                 
50434335010000060 ALGER GALE         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1995 04 04 00 2     794608       4316       4815       3862                 
50434335010000070 GREEFF OLIVE R         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1969 01 01 00 1      50185        556        629        387                 
50434335010000070 GREEFF OLIVE R         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 03 03 00 1     312244       3789       3924       3539                 
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 03 01 00 1      60107        823        968        484                 
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1970 03 02 00 1     127099       1735       1735       1735                 
50434335010000080 CASA PICCHIO LLC         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 05 07 00 2     925655       5180       5348       5124                 
50434335010000101 10 VIA VIZCAYA LLC MALASKY HOMES INC C/O        0.667 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 06 07 01 2    3495398       9625      10720       8627                 
50434335010000110 11 VIA VIZCAYA LLC MALASKY HOMES INC C/O        0.4531 VACANT                           
50434335010000120 KURTZ RICHARD KAMSON CORP C/O        0 VACANT                           
50434335010000130 MALASKY DONALD C MALASKY DONALD C REV TRUST        0.492 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00 2    1711103       6327       6619       5913                 
50434335010000140 MCHUGH GODFREY T & LILLIAN         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 03 03 00 1     282812       3421       3633       3067                 
50434335020000150 2042312 ONTARIO INC         0 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 00 04 01 2    1328384       3990       4481       3532                 
50434335020000161 MELE GAUDIERI ROBBIN ALAN R LEIST JR ET AL TR HLDRS        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1990 03 03 00 2     375688       3687       3843       3322                 
50434335020000162 KANTER MYRON A & KANTER MYRNA H        0.26 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 01 1     586412       3457       3690       3046                 
50434335020000170 LEE J PHILIP & AMY R         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1985 03 03 01 2     550037       3120       3245       2829                 
50434335020000180 MOSELLE ROBERT         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1965 03 03 01 1     405733       3226       3375       2669                 
50434335020000190 CALMAN ROBERT F & DORIS S CALMAN DORIS S        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1975 05 04 00 2     262200       3002       3093       3033                 
50434335020000200 SCHILLER ELIZABETH J         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1985 03 03 01 2     431614       3868       4036       3616                 
50434335020000210 ZOIS ELIA         0.44 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1995 04 05 01 2    1558738       6803       7154       6124                 
50434335020000220 DWYER ROBERT J DWYER CONCEITA A        0.4599 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1995 05 05 01 2     809012       5853       6843       5253                 
50434335020000231 CAIN JOSEPH         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 04 04 01 2     749865       4596       4745       4280                 
50434335020000232 KHAWLY MARY T         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 04 04 01 1     707345       4441       6244       3498                 
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR        1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1940 03 02 00 2      50231        816        860        750                 
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR        1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 1980 05 08 01 1     589070      12546      14362      10701                 
50434335030000010 MILLER ROBERT L & MYRON MILLER TR TITL HLDR        1.9783 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 1      33660        313        521          1                 
50434335030000110 LEE SAN K J         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1975 02 02 00 2     124790       1268       1586        786                 
50434335030000110 LEE SAN K J         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 2000 04 06 01 2    1643435       7133       7412       6940                 
50434335030000120 HAMILL STERLING M         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1975 05 08 01 2    1374901       8210       9610       6500                 
50434335030000140 MARULLI ALFRED & BARBARA MARULLI BARBARA        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1935 1970 05 05 01 2    1065122       7268       7583       6221                 
50434335030000150 BAKER VICTORIA O         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1990 05 05 00 1     424128       4885       5276       4237                 
50434335030000160 RICKMAN WILLIAM M JR & MARCIA B TRUST         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 2000 05 04 01 2    1778269       5718       5784       5784                 
50434335030000160 RICKMAN WILLIAM M JR & MARCIA B TRUST         0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2     134138       1430       1628        968                 
50434335030000171 STUART GLORIA G         0.9292 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1990 04 07 00 2     893581       7342      10188       6016                 
50434335030000173 MILLER HOLLY A MILLER MYRON TR        0.5507 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1932 01 01 00 1      65507       1099       1335        640                 
50434335030000173 MILLER HOLLY A MILLER MYRON TR        0.5507 SINGLE FAMILY 1925 1960 03 03 01 1     667104       3476       4796       2996                 
50434335030000210 MILLER MYRON TR         0.2089 VACANT                           
50434335040000010 WEITZMAN CAROLE         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1970 05 05 01 2     307959       5843       6470       4494                 
50434335040000020 BOHANNON BENTON P         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 04 05 00 2     454317       4236       5182       3143                 
50434335040000030 JACKSON R E JR JACKSON CAROLYN J        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1965 05 05 01 3     845065       6322       7185       4606                 
50434335040000040 MCNAMARA JAMES J & MCNAMARA ANGIE        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 05 06 00 3     714705       6696       7309       6330                 
50434335040000050 STONESTROM ERIC &         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 04 04 01 2    1046161       4888       6032       4286                 
50434335040000060 BROWNLOW GIRARD P III         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1960 00 03 01 2     667295       5305       5417       4952                 
50434335040000070 BERNSTEIN MICHAEL E &         0 VACANT                           
50434335040000080 GWYNNE JAY M         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1980 03 03 01 1     444241       3983       4187       3603                 
50434335040000090 165 KINGS ROAD LLC         0.71 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 00 07 01 2    2147916       8151       8789       7577                 
50434335040000110 KCC FLORIDA DEV CORP         0.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 05 07 00 2    1798003       7280       8460       6540                 
50434335040000120 EMBRESCIA JUDITH A THOMAS J EMBRESCIA TR TITL HLDR        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1980 04 04 00 2     716461       4793       5523       2920                 
50434335040000130 AARON GENE & AARON MINDY        0.3285 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 06 01 2    2458142       6244       6937       5846                 
50434335040000140 KINGS ESTATE INC         0.3285 VACANT                           
50434335040000150 KENNEDY SUZANNE W KENNEDY SUZANNE W TR        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1965 03 03 00 1     321908       3302       3884       2984                 
50434335040000150 KENNEDY SUZANNE W KENNEDY SUZANNE W TR        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 01 01 00 1      42068        531        644        483                 
50434335040000160 TAYLOR MILBREY R         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1954 1960 04 04 01 2     232011       4392       5252       3725                 
50434335040000170 WEISSMAN JODY         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1924 1990 05 07 01 3.5    4120162       9347      12380       7480                 
50434335040000180 JDPB HOLDINGS INC         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1980 04 04 01 2     651439       4403       5287       3784                 
50434335040000190 SCAIFE JENNIE K         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1998 05 05 01 2     588723       5602       6266       4998                 
50434335050000011 GOODRICH FLORIDA REALTY TRUST COLEMAN JOHN J TR        0 VACANT                           
50434335050000012 SCHNEIDER LEONARD & LILLIAN SCHNEIDER LILLIAN        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1990 05 05 00 1    2071073       8333       8711       7819                 
50434335050000020 LEHMANN GUNTHER         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1945 02 02 00 1       5303       1860       2054       1279                 
50434335050000032 GRAU ELIZABETH TRUMP         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1958 2000 03 03 01 2     793358       6369       6598       6011                 
50434335050000041 HARUVI ABE         0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 00 01 00 1       3242        312        312        312                 
50434335050000041 HARUVI ABE         0.34 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1972 04 04 01 1     126619       4229       4498       3824                 
50434335050000051 MUSSER HILLARY G         0.47 SINGLE FAMILY 2002 2002 05 07 01 2    2279218       7715       8760       6917                 
50434335050000070 JBPB HOLDINGS INC         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1955 01 01 00 1      58420        811       1113        510                 
50434335050000070 JBPB HOLDINGS INC         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1975 03 05 00 1     273485       3135       3324       3054                 
50434335050000080 OELSNER VESNA         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1987 05 05 01 1     682147       5320       5775       4763                 
50434335050000091 RIBIS NICHOLAS L & CAROL A         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1975 04 05 01 1     728657       5406       6253       4784                 
50434335050000101 DEMOSS NANCY S         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 2    1681529       9833      12782       8889                 
50434335050000101 DEMOSS NANCY S         0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 07 01 2    2408353       7433       8504       6631                 
50434335050000151 DESMOND DAVID W &         0.7748 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 05 06 01 2    2692177       6767       7541       6348                 
50434335050000151 DESMOND DAVID W &         0.7748 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1     224145       1796       1995       1995                 
50434335050000180 DLP LAND INC THE CORPORATION TRUST CO C/O        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1955 01 01 00 1      64558        791        952        440                 
50434335050000180 DLP LAND INC THE CORPORATION TRUST CO C/O        0 SINGLE FAMILY 1950 1980 03 03 01 2     544201       4955       4994       4994                 
50434335050000191 BALASCO RUSSELL J  WOODBRIDGE 000 136 WOODBRIDGE RD 136 WOODBRIDGE RD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5012 842,661.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1990 04 04 00 2     784493       4894       5268       4537                 
50434335050000202 TRUMP DONALD J  WOODBRIDGE 000 124 WOODBRIDGE RD 721 FIFTH AVENUE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2537 2,501,908.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1974 1980 03 03 01 1     197668       3808       4072       2950                 
50434335050000203 TRUMP DONALD J  WOODBRIDGE 000 WOODBRIDGE RD 1100 S OCEAN BLVD  PALM BEACH FL 33480 5004 86,250.00 0.1894 VACANT                           
50434335050000211 TRUMP DONALD J THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION C/O OCEAN 000 1094  S OCEAN BLVD 725 5TH AVE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2519 5,039,023.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1985 02 02 00 1     192698       1432       1612       1162                 
50434335050000211 TRUMP DONALD J THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION C/O OCEAN 000 1094  S OCEAN BLVD 725 5TH AVE  NEW YORK NY 10022 2519 5,039,023.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 05 04 00 1    1671486       5492       6251       4643                 
50434335050000240 BARRY MARYANNE        8,971,588.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1990 05 11 00 2    1958324       9896      10455       8269                 
50434335060000010 BATH & TENNIS CLUB INC        20,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1926 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME       5860        106         
50434335060000010 BATH & TENNIS CLUB INC        20,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1926 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      50930       2220         
50434335060000010 BATH & TENNIS CLUB INC        20,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1926 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      53470       2525         
50434335060000010 BATH & TENNIS CLUB INC        20,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1926 1980 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    2157030      65878         
50434335060000010 BATH & TENNIS CLUB INC        20,000,000.00 0 CLB/LDG/UN HALL           1974 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     436350      15066         
50434335070000010 BERNSTEIN MICHAEL E & BERNSTEIN LORI J       2,798,522.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1965 05 06 01 2    1347561       5967       6297       5508                 
50434335070000020 FORD BEATRIZ A        1,332,854.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1970 05 06 01 2    1462981       6433       7466       5682                 
50434335070000030 LOUIS EDDY J        2,625,427.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1979 04 05 01 2    1404664       6613       7326       5998                 
50434335070000040 PRICE VIRGIL M II & PRICE KATHLEEN M       3,445,836.00 0.8442 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1980 04 04 01 2    1676300       4623       5035       4278                 
50434335070000050 MILNER JOYCE L MILNER DOCUMENT PROD C/O       3,828,164.00 0.7072 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1970 04 05 01 2    1387934       6067       6767       5450                 
50434335080000010 PBC REALTY        7,245,000.00 0.69 VACANT                           
50434335080000020 M & C PROPERTIES        7,245,000.00 0.64 VACANT                           
50434335080000030 MCCARTHY JOSEPH W MCCARTHY GLORIA A       5,206,504.00 0.73 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 05 07 01 2    3606292      10438      13217       8953                 
50434335080000040 TOLD WILLIAM H JR &        7,018,238.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 07 08 01 3    5763937      10739      12773       9413                 
50434335080000050 KROCK PHYLLIS GARDENIA HOLDING CORP TR       5,016,855.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 05 05 03 2    3415884       8676      10192       7736                 
50434335080000060 BREYO JOHN        3,168,804.00 0.74 VACANT                           
50434335080000071 BREYO JOHN BREYO MARILYN       7,018,723.00 0.74 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 06 01 2    3800873       9401      11041       8434                 
50434335080000072 MARCELLO ROCCO A TR        14,879,218.00 1.24 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 07 01 1    2806903       8577       9924       7347                 
50434402000010010 1220 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD LLC        207.00 0.69 RIVERS/LAKES                           
50434402000010022 WHITE SEA HOLDINGS LLC        29,733,515.00 3.72 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 08 08 02 1.5   12471418      25241      30266      18452                 
50434402000010040 SAVILLE LINDA J MAURA ZISKA TR TITL HLDR       32,103,541.00 3.39 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 1991 00 02 00 2     172681       2299       2530       2200                 
50434402000010040 SAVILLE LINDA J MAURA ZISKA TR TITL HLDR       32,103,541.00 3.39 SINGLE FAMILY 1991 2000 00 09 01 2.5    5806898      18370      21349      15671                 
50434402000010050 AUDUBON SOCIETY OF THE EVERGLADES INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434402000010051 THORNTON JOHN L & THORNTON MARGARET B       31,652,573.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 09 01 2    7473992      24126      32316      18437                 
50434402000010070 MAHONEY HILDEGARDE E        6,901,773.00 3.11 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 1992 00 09 01 2    2152506      14676      18206      12358                 
50434402000020010 MEZZACAPPA ELIZABETH        15,670,528.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 07 08 03 2    8626887      17410      22164      15398                 
50434402000020030 CLARK JAMES H CLARK JAMES H TR       40,522,372.00 5.48 SINGLE FAMILY 1927 2003 06 11 08 2   19498381      45038      60352      40916                 
50434402000020030 CLARK JAMES H CLARK JAMES H TR       40,522,372.00 5.48 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 01 02 01 2    1421312       3552       5381       1609                 
50434402000020030 CLARK JAMES H CLARK JAMES H TR       40,522,372.00 5.48 SINGLE FAMILY 2004 2004 00 00 00 1     220345       1958       2648       1662                 
50434402000020040 ADLER FREDERICK R & CATHERINE G ADLER H/W       5,115,772.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 07 01 3    2363443      10964      11627       9971                 
50434402000020050 WALLACE WILLIAM L & KATHLEEN S KATHLEEN S WALLACE       6,096,959.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1990 04 05 01 2     537024       5702       6088       4838                 
50434402000020050 WALLACE WILLIAM L & KATHLEEN S KATHLEEN S WALLACE       6,096,959.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1997 1997 00 02 00 1     231178       2121       2939       1426                 
50434402000020060 TAYLOR SUSAN O        17,787,320.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 05 09 00 3    4551261      10868      12808       9630                 
50434402000020070 GLAZER MALCOLM I & LINDA J GLAZER LINDA J       5,053,060.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1933 1985 05 09 01 2    2624005      12960      13766      12272                 
50434402000020080 NINETY 9798 CANADA INC SANPALO INVESTMENTS CORP C/O       12,407,705.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1985 05 09 01 1.5    3203558      14313      26135      11065                 
50434402000020090 GRUSS MARTIN D GRUSS AUDREY       22,355,532.00 3.89 SINGLE FAMILY 2000 2000 08 09 02 2   12089383      19972      26576      15573                 
50434402000020110 NINETY 9798 CANADA INC SANPALO INVESTMENTS CORP C/O       3,803,625.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402010000010 PICOWER JEFFRY M        10,302,636.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1992 02 01 00 1     161334       1816       2286        720                 
50434402010000010 PICOWER JEFFRY M        10,302,636.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1992 05 11 01 2    5205733      13304      15481      12343                 
50434402010000090 MILLER SYDELL MARKEY ROBERT G TR       48,670,656.00 3.73 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 10 14 05 3   26205349      51972      84626      34775                 
50434402010000211 TYERMAN BARRY W TR BOULEVARD MGMT C/O       19,190,985.00 1.49 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1995 05 11 00 2    4247882      14079      17068      12340                 
50434402010000320 1440 HOLDINGS LLC MILLER SYDELL C/O       17,275,486.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1952 02 02 01 1      58286        631        916        442                 
50434402010000401 MORAN JOHN A        3,821,710.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1983 05 06 00 2    2215107       6517       7310       5852                 
50434402010000450 BAUM THEODORE B        12,425,982.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 2001 05 08 01 1    3806028      11816      15122      10004                 
50434402020000010 BENSON ELIZABETH H        2,244,965.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 07 00 2    1368038       6072       7179       5286                 
50434402020000020 EAGLET AERIE LLC ADLER & CO C/O       1,507,920.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1951 1980 02 02 00 1     353319       2148       2249       1963                 
50434402020000030 NIBLACK JOHN F &        7,817,607.00 0.7079 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 02 00 2    2997483       5664       6107       5215                 
50434402020000030 NIBLACK JOHN F &        7,817,607.00 0.7079 SINGLE FAMILY 2007 2007 00 00 00      193450       2088       2280       2040                 
50434402020000050 128 OCEAN VIEW LLC        5,205,200.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402020000060 MOORE VICTOR & TATOOLES JOHN J       1,150,000.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1953 1980 03 03 01 2     452155       2802       3040       2020                 
50434402020000070 CARY WILLIAM B & WILLIAM B & EDITH F CARY TR HLDRS       759,926.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1970 03 03 00 1     337389       2711       4029       1904                 
50434402020000080 FIEVE RONALD R        2,341,392.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 1970 04 04 01 2      32748       4196       4956       3595                 
50434402030000030 KNAPP GARY B        4,429,239.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 04 06 01 1.5     796150       4221       4710       3607                 
50434402030000040 CARTER DONALD C & CARTER NANCY       620,788.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1929 1960 04 03 01 1     260346       3565       3684       3385                 
50434402030000050 CARTER DONALD C        950,906.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402030000060 CARTER DONALD C & CARTER NANCY       3,324,564.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 2000 06 06 01 3    2336281       9814      12416       8766                 
50434402030000060 CARTER DONALD C & CARTER NANCY       3,324,564.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2001 2001 01 02 00 1     340696       1270       1655        652                 
50434402030000070 SWANSON DOLORES M        4,068,643.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1966 00 01 00 1      38841        459        616        392                 
50434402030000070 SWANSON DOLORES M        4,068,643.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1966 02 02 00 1      98918       2351       2442       2137                 
50434402030000070 SWANSON DOLORES M        4,068,643.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1975 05 05 00 2     534599       5465       5963       5268                 
50434402030000080 OTTO JONATHAN TRUMP PLAZA OFFICE CENTER C/O       5,391,727.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1990 05 07 01 2    1877735       5151       5408       4778                 
50434402030000090 128 OCEAN VIEW LLC        4,405,915.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402040000011 BOGEN ROBERTA A  & BOGEN STANLEY       9,965,369.00 1.1831 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1985 00 05 01 2    2435162       9435      10431       8403                 
50434402040000012 OSMENA MARIA V        1,636,417.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1990 03 04 00 3    1140496       3707       4176       3444                 
50434402040000013 DEGUARDIOLA ROBERTO A JR & DEGUARDIOLA JOANNE M       2,131,942.00 0.8663 SINGLE FAMILY 1928 1995 05 05 01 3    1081977       6015       6716       5714                 
50434402040000022 MAIN STREET SERVICES INC        4,899,494.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 2001 03 03 00 2    1242664       4694       5905       4188                 
50434402040000040 CARTER DONALD C & CARTER NANCY       2,717.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402040000050 CARTER DONALD C        2,717.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402040000060 CARTER DONALD C & NANCY        2,717.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402040000070 SWANSON EDWARD R & DOLORES M        2,717.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402040000080 OTTO JONATHAN METRO CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC C/O       2,717.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402040000090 128 OCEAN VIEW LLC        2,717.00 0 VACANT                           
50434402060000010 1220 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD LLC        13,611,000.00 2.1077 VACANT                           
50434402090000010 SMM REALTY LLC        5,289,099.00 0.97 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 05 08 00 2    1365580       9832      10383       9389                 
50434402090000020 THORNTON JOHN L THORNTON MARGARET B       4,258,445.00 0.98 SINGLE FAMILY 1986 1986 06 06 01 2     118445       8522      10495       7596                 
50434402090000030 100 EMERALD BEACH WAY LAMIA JACOBS C/O       27,947,172.00 2.01 SINGLE FAMILY 1998 1998 00 09 00 2    8632735      13929      17276      11782                 
50434402100000010 MCPHAIL WALTER & MCPHAIL MARY A       17,868,616.00 2.25 SINGLE FAMILY 1985 1985 05 06 00 2    1399954      11121      14354       9111                 
50434402100000020 BERWIND C GRAHAM        18,873,598.00 2.04 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1995 05 06 01 1     466795       7912      11142       6055                 
50434402100000030 BOLTON MARY P        5,662,662.00 1.98 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 05 06 00 3    1852758       8128       9988       6730                 
50434402100000040 FIGULUS IV PARTNERSHIP MARY P BOLTON C/O       5,777,737.00 1.65 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 05 04 00 3     602473       3505       4376       3171                 
50434402100000050 HERTOG SUSAN &        10,286,710.00 1.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1994 1996 00 06 01 1    5388909       9420      10827       8368                 
50434402100000060 MARKIN DAVID        4,962,241.00 1.45 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 04 06 00 1    1705109       7744       9133       6681                 
50434402100000070 KRAKOFF REED        13,413,400.00 5.98 VACANT                           
50434402100000081 STRAUB GEORGE E TR        20,020.00 0.08 VACANT                           
50434402100000090 HAMMONDS SANDRA        11,421,774.00 1.88 VACANT                           
50434402100000100 MURDOCH MANN A        10,761,009.00 1.91 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1983 00 06 01 1    2478514       9315      10833       8333                 
50434402100010000 BLOSSOM EST HMOWNERS ASSN INC GLEN STRAUB C/O       0.00 0.58 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434402110000010 KRAMER IRWIN H & TERRY A ET AL ALLEN & CO C/O       5,426,234.00 2.11 VACANT                           
50434402110000020 SCHAR DWIGHT SKLORMAN SHERI TR       59,250,386.00 11.3672 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1994 00 18 00 3    5827553      19026      25949      15035                 
50434402110000020 SCHAR DWIGHT SKLORMAN SHERI TR       59,250,386.00 11.3672 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1985 00 02 00 1     227851       2139       2946       2092                 
50434402110000020 SCHAR DWIGHT SKLORMAN SHERI TR       59,250,386.00 11.3672 SINGLE FAMILY 1932 1985 03 03 00 2     341830       3262       3935       2271                 
50434402110000051 KRAMER TERRY ALLEN ALLEN & CO C/O       35,955,205.00 2.61 SINGLE FAMILY 1995 1995 00 15 00 2   12802699      28686      37098      20806                 
50434402110000070 WATKINS EDWARD G COLEMAN JOHN J TR       24,685,759.00 2.03 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 04 09 02 3   10721162      21036      28399      13936                 
50434410000040000 PALM BEACH TOWN OF LESSOR NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC LESSEE       0.00 4 LEASEHOLD INT                           
50434410000050000 PALM BEACH TOWN OF LESSOR NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC LESSEE       0.00 3 LEASEHOLD INT                           
50434411000010010 VITTORIA LUCIANA        6,109,078.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1985 05 05 00 2     188835       2646       2799       2328                 
50434411000010010 VITTORIA LUCIANA        6,109,078.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 1990 05 14 00 1    2011498      14230      16067      12843                 
50434411000010050 MONTGOMERY MARY M        9,931,093.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1985 02 03 00 2     396823       3680       4468       2372                 
50434411000010050 MONTGOMERY MARY M        9,931,093.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1923 1990 05 08 01 3    3698566      19996      21883      18503                 
50434411000010060 TAUBMAN A ALFRED TR        27,891,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1970 03 03 00 2     396879       4118       5384       2832                 
50434411000010060 TAUBMAN A ALFRED TR        27,891,278.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1990 05 07 01 2    2062030      12002      13071      10188                 
50434411000010070 RINKER RUBY S RINKER RUBY S TR       15,047,354.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 1990 02 02 00 1     177462       1949       2486       1230                 
50434411000010070 RINKER RUBY S RINKER RUBY S TR       15,047,354.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1971 2003 07 09 02 2    2014104       8768       9743       7949                 
50434411000010080 NINETY 9798 CANADA INC SANPALO INVESTMENTS CORP C/O       3,332,700.00 0 VACANT                           
50434411000020010 DUPONT W H & MIREN A DUPONT MIREN A       8,095,607.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1937 1938 02 03 01 1       9868       1947       2184       1393                 
50434411000020010 DUPONT W H & MIREN A DUPONT MIREN A       8,095,607.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1965 05 08 01 2     281939      16278      17943      15378                 
50434411000020020 RUBENSTEIN MITCHELL &        6,228,525.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1926 1965 04 04 01 1      30959       5528       5982       5226                 
50434411000020020 RUBENSTEIN MITCHELL &        6,228,525.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1966 01 01 00 1       3091        569        720        504                 
50434411000020030 RUBENSTEIN MITCHELL &        10,005,552.00 1.68 VACANT                           
50434411000020050 CONRAD BLACK CAPITAL CORP        30,781,591.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1973 2000 05 09 01 2    8043857      19320      21672      15795                 
50434411000020060 FRANKEL KEITH        12,330,437.00 1.74 VACANT                           
50434411010000010 SCARPA JOHN F DEL RASO JOSEPH V TR       8,443,061.00 1.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1957 2003 05 10 00 2    2120126      10195      11303       9466                 
50434411010000010 SCARPA JOHN F DEL RASO JOSEPH V TR       8,443,061.00 1.5 SINGLE FAMILY 1964 1980 02 02 00 1     284290       2282       3237       1872                 
50434411010000020 BLOND O STAB MAUREEN N DONNELL C/O       28,531,879.00 3.2362 VACANT 1978 1978 04 05 00 1     106293       6395       6875       5635                 
50434411010000040 STEINBERG PHILIP        3,982,246.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 05 07 01 2     780538       8203       9099       7600                 
50434411020000010 MAXWELL GERTRUDE        2,022,561.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1980 05 06 00 2     846229       4663       4864       4360                 
50434411020000030 JACKSON REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LLC GY CORPORATE SVC INC C/O       2,204,384.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1960 04 05 01 2    1043456       4247       4909       3673                 
50434411020000040 CARABOOLAD GEOFFREY S METRIC CORP C/O       2,537,402.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1980 05 08 00 2    1809709       8522       9174       7608                 
50434411020000050 SCHMITT ALFONS SCHMITT ENAAM       3,185,633.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1990 05 09 00 1    1993997       8750      10086       7608                 
50434411020000060 GREENWAY FINANCIAL GROUP LLC        5,252,311.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1962 1970 04 05 00 3     820550       4513       5980       3950                 
50434411020000070 KAMIN HANNAH J        2,494,916.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1965 04 05 01 2    1461772       4655       5219       4199                 
50434411020000080 GLAZER JEROME GLAZER JEROME TR       2,547,383.00 0.57 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1964 04 05 01 2    1126323       4411       4864       4000                 
50434411030001001 GRACE ROBERT M & JANE R GRACE JANE R       1,967,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 05 07 00 1     118791       5687       6134       5414                 
50434411030001002 ORANGE OLIVE CO        7,506,435.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1952 1970 04 04 01 2     469167       5021       5491       4200                 
50434411030001003 1620 SOUTH OCEAN LLC        8,268,910.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2006 2006 00 00 00 2    2586133       9393      10111       8723                 
50434411030001004 HEILWEIL JEROME P & FLORA P FLORA P HEILWEIL       2,264,659.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1997 04 04 01 1     908930       5618       6671       4643                 
50434411030001011 HARRISON AUGUSTA JONES TRUST HARRISON AUGUSTA JONES TR       2,233,123.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1956 04 05 01 2     360888       5848       6899       5133                 
50434411030001041 ATHANS PERSA        1,951,369.00 0.7556 SINGLE FAMILY 1977 1977 04 05 01 1     781520       4324       4992       3625                 
50434411030001042 EYCKELER PETER A        5,463,253.00 0.4381 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1988 05 06 01 2    1618029      10705      12390       8901                 
50434411030001051 SIMKINS MORTON H        2,832,051.00 0.5775 SINGLE FAMILY 1980 1995 04 06 00 2     236590       6050       6396       5266                 
50434411030001052 LEHMANN GUNTHER E        5,678,272.00 0.6417 SINGLE FAMILY 1987 1987 05 06 01 2     589535       6730       7261       6067                 
50434411030001061 TRAVERSE NORMAN        7,396,422.00 1.8573 SINGLE FAMILY 1955 1955 00 05 00 2.5     161269       7624       8727       7256                 
50434411030001063 FOUR WINDS ESTATES LLC        23,548,044.00 3.0394 VACANT                           
50434411030001070 MACK EARLE I        11,880,172.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1950 03 02 00 2      81467       1061       1144        936                 
50434411030001070 MACK EARLE I        11,880,172.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1950 03 02 01 1     100586       1592       1873        937                 
50434411030001070 MACK EARLE I        11,880,172.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1938 1985 05 08 01 2    2595341      10769      11844       9756                 
50434411030001080 1960 SOUTH OCEAN BLVD LLC EMMA CISNEROS C/O       29,704,643.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2003 2003 06 07 06 2   11145055      25519      33336      20219                 
50434411030001091 SILVERSTEIN NATHAN R        4,540,607.00 0.774 VACANT                           
50434411030001092 SLOANS CURVE NORTH INC ABRAMSON QUITNER ABRAMSON & MOFFA C/O       4,034,550.00 1.397 VACANT                           
50434411030001101 SLOANS CURVE HMOWNERS ASSN INC        0.00 2.1401 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434411030001121 SLOANS CURVE II CORP        1,316.00 0 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434411030001151 SLOANS CURVE HMOWNERS ASSN INC DENNIS P FLYNN, AGENT C/O       0.00 1.42 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1979 1986 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     280760       3376         
50434411030001201 PALM BEACH TOWN OF (PHIPPS PARK)       0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1900 1940 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      19160        651         
50434411030001201 PALM BEACH TOWN OF (PHIPPS PARK)       0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1950 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      23870        350         
50434411030001201 PALM BEACH TOWN OF (PHIPPS PARK)       0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1950 1975 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      25110        336         
50434411030001201 PALM BEACH TOWN OF (PHIPPS PARK)       0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1956 1976 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      52710       1337         
50434411030001201 PALM BEACH TOWN OF (PHIPPS PARK)       0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1992 1992 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      25490        593         
50434411030001201 PALM BEACH TOWN OF (PHIPPS PARK)       0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           1995 1995 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS     891330      12284         
50434411030001201 PALM BEACH TOWN OF (PHIPPS PARK)       0.00 0 MUNICIPAL           2002 2002 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      63970        576         
50434411030001202 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.46 MUNICIPAL                           
50434411030001291 WARD DONNA        4,347,000.00 0.65 VACANT                           
50434411030001292 WARD DONNA        905,625.00 0.23 VACANT                           
50434411030001293 WARD DONNA        905,625.00 0.23 VACANT                           
50434411030001294 WARD DONNA        905,625.00 0.23 VACANT                           
50434411030001295 TRINKA GAIL        724,404.00 0.1221 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 02 01 2     212088       2789       2992       2488                 
50434411030001303 2310 INVESTORS LLC        1,252,501.00 0.1528 VACANT COMM           1950 1960 0008 01 2 FIRE RESIS     151090       4166         
50434411030001305 FARRINGTON RONALD A        580,254.00 0.1243 SINGLE FAMILY 1989 1989 03 02 01 2     212088       2789       2992       2488                 
50434411030001321 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 31.6 GOLF COURSE           1960 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      62380       1272         
50434411030001321 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 31.6 GOLF COURSE           1990 1990 0001 01 1 WOOD FRAME     145270       3000         
50434411031100060 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.0551 MUNICIPAL                           
50434411040001010 GILLESPIE JOHN J        213,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1968    969     213150 
50434411040001020 SIMONE ROBERT L & SIMONE MADELINE A       134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001030 LEVENSON IRWIN & ADELE TRUST LEVENSON IRWIN TR       134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001040 MATERIO PHILIP & MATERIO SHARON       134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001050 BRANDONISIO NANCY &        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001060 106 PB WHITE HOUSE LLC        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001070 WALDRON KARIN        14,568.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001080 COFFIN MARY K        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001090 ST JOHN DAVID & ST JOHN AMANDA       134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001100 BLAU BRETT AMATO C/O       134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001110 BROWN WILLIAM & SHANE AMY B       111,552.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1110 0400 CONDO 1968    640     111552 
50434411040001140 RODRIGUEZ SUE S RODRIGUEZ JOST       84,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1140 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001150 BURDI SANDRA        25,328.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1150 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001160 GRUNDER ELINOR JEAN GRUNDER ELINOR JEAN TR       15,068.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1160 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001170 BENNETTE RICHARD        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1170 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001180 YANKOVICH JOSEPH & EVELYN        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1180 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001190 DEL GROSSO ROCCO & JEAN        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1190 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001200 MARINO JOSE MARINO MARCELO F       84,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1200 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001210 DUBOW MAXINE        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1210 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001220 SMITH LESLIE A        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1220 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001230 SHERRILL GLADYS B        84,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1230 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001240 MASANO MARLENE D TR        134,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1240 0400 CONDO 1968    640     134400 
50434411040001250 COHEN GARY & COHEN SUSAN       297,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 1250 0400 CONDO 1968   1511     297150 
50434411040002010 RITTERSBACHER GEORGE        218,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1968    969     218150 
50434411040002020 LEON MICHAEL D & LEON HELENE O       89,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002030 CUYAR ROBERT A & OLGA R        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002040 LEVINSON RONALD & BETH        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002050 PETRAKI HENRY J        21,976.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002060 PREGADIO ROSARIO        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002070 HERBON ELLIS R        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002080 302 PB WHITE HOUSE LLC        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002090 LAURITANO RACHELINA TR        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002100 COLGAN SIGRID        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002110 SCISCO ROBERT W & ROSALIND K SCISCO TRS       139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002120 KELLY SHARON        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002140 HELLAWELL RAYMOND J TRUST        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002150 AUGI VICTOR P        36,864.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002160 VIGNONE THERESE E        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002170 SMITH DALE ELIZABETH WANNER TR WANNER FRANCIS WALTON JR TR       139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002180 MANZIONE ROSE F        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002190 BUCKLEY COLIN H & GRUNER STEPHANIE       89,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2190 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002200 LEARD MARGARET H & LEARD COOLIDGE LINDSAY       21,976.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002210 LOVELL MICHAEL R        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002220 MCAULIFFE EUGENE F & ELINOR M        139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002230 PRATLEY ELKE & PRATLEY ANTONY       139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2230 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002240 LOVELL RONALD L & LOVELL ILSE H       139,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2240 0400 CONDO 1968    640     139650 
50434411040002250 PRATLEY ELKE        307,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 2250 0400 CONDO 1968   1511     307150 
50434411040003010 OEHLER RITA A & YESGOSH CYNTHIA S       223,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1968    969     223650 
50434411040003020 LESSARD LUCIE M        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003030 ABRAHAMER ADA        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003040 NASH JOHN & NASH PATRICIA       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003050 EAGLE WINGS LLC        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003060 CYR MICHAEL        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003070 BELLIN DONALD E & BELLIN JERRY H       36,740.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003080 JOHN F GOULD RESIDUARY TRUST        22,607.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003090 COX GARY D &        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003100 BOYKIN JONATHAN & BOYKIN ZOE J       144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003110 LEVINSON RONALD & BETH        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003120 312 PB WHITE HOUSE LLC        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003140 NICKELL WENDLE S &        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003150 GANDARILLA JOSE        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003160 STARK RUDOLF & STARK ELKE C       144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003170 FARGO LISA H &        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003180 LATHOURAKIS STEVEN LATHOURAKIS ALICIA C       144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3180 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003190 FONSECA MERCEDES & FONSECA NESTOR       144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3190 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003200 SPRADLIN CAROL M        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3200 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003210 LHEUREUX PHILIP F & GEAR TARA       94,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3210 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003220 WANNER DORISE E        22,607.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3220 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003230 HARTZ STANLEY & HELEN TRS        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3230 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003240 DUBOIS ZULEMA TR &        144,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3240 0400 CONDO 1968    640     144650 
50434411040003250 LEHMAN RICHARD &        315,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441104 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #3 CONDO 3250 0400 CONDO 1968   1511     315000 
50434411050011010 WEINRIB JEROME C/O ABC CARPET CO       1,517,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1517250 
50434411050011020 COHEN MAURICE M & MARILYN A        963,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385     963900 
50434411050011030 COUGHLIN DEBRA        877,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     877800 
50434411050011040 ALPERT ROBERT        1,047,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1047900 
50434411050011060 SHOCKET ENID SHOCKET & DOCKSER C/O       977,940.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1047900 
50434411050011070 RUDBART JANICE M        367,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     877800 
50434411050011080 TRIEDMAN M HOWARD &        963,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385     963900 
50434411050011090 HELMAN IRVING J & BELLE R        1,517,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1517250 
50434411050011100 TEPPERMAN FRED &        1,456,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1456350 
50434411050012010 MACKLOWE LLOYD & MACKLOWE BARBARA       1,622,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1622250 
50434411050012020 WOLF JOHN M & WOLF LEATRICE K       719,410.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1016400 
50434411050012030 LEWIS RONA E & MELINDA LEWIS & DEBORAH L SUMMERFIELD TRS       930,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     930300 
50434411050012040 SCHWARTZ LUCILLE I TR        1,100,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1100400 
50434411050012060 COHEN MARILYN A        610,186.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1100400 
50434411050012070 ADES REGINA        930,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     930300 
50434411050012080 BORG LEO & BORG DORIS J       1,016,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1016400 
50434411050012090 SCHLESSEL WALTER & SCHLESSEL MARILYN       1,559,385.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1622250 
50434411050012100 HAMMERMAN LOIS TR        606,407.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1561350 
50434411050013010 SPORK OTTO R        1,672,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1672250 
50434411050013020 HARRIS ERIC I & HARRIS RUTH J       1,036,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1036400 
50434411050013030 DAPARY MGMT CORP        950,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     950300 
50434411050013040 ROBERTS EDWARD        1,142,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1142400 
50434411050013050 FLAMM ALEC & MIRIAM FLAMM MIRIAM       513,333.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1981   2816    1017450 
50434411050013060 FLAXMAN EUGENE R & FLAXMAN SANDRA M       1,070,640.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1142400 
50434411050013070 ULRICH INVS (1966) LTD        950,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     950300 
50434411050013080 TIFFAN PALM BEACH CORP        1,036,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1036400 
50434411050013090 LEPOW HOWARD G        1,672,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1672250 
50434411050013100 SCHUMAN JEROME B & BOBBE C        1,611,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1611350 
50434411050014010 PODELL HERBERT & PODELL LORRAINE       790,442.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1722250 
50434411050014020 SHAPIRO MICHAEL M        1,056,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1056400 
50434411050014030 ADLER ALAN & FAYE        970,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     970300 
50434411050014040 SHAPIRO PHILIP J & JANET R        1,162,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1162400 
50434411050014050 DORFMAN MARTIN S & SONIA J DORFMAN SONIA J       514,434.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1981   2816    1038450 
50434411050014060 SCHOUELA SIMONE        1,162,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1162400 
50434411050014070 DANIELS SELMA S        419,514.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     970300 
50434411050014080 PODELL HERBERT S & LORRAINE        1,056,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1056400 
50434411050014090 KATZ NANCY G        982,791.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1722250 
50434411050014100 4232321 CANADA INC        1,661,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1661350 
50434411050015010 SHORE ELLIN        1,832,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1832250 
50434411050015020 HEBERT NORMAN D        1,121,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1121400 
50434411050015030 LEVINE LEWIS &        1,035,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494    1035300 
50434411050015040 MEISEL RENEE KOCHMAN RONALD S TR       1,193,740.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1268400 
50434411050015050 HEISLER LESLYE M HEISLER LESLYE M TR       1,092,270.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1981   2816    1164450 
50434411050015060 HOLLENBERG IRA & HOLLENBERG BONNIE       1,176,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1268400 
50434411050015070 ELIAS JACK & ANITA TRS ANITA ELIAS       421,116.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494    1035300 
50434411050015080 RUSSO IRVING & RAE RUSSO RAE       421,116.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1121400 
50434411050015090 SHAPIRO BEATRICE L        1,781,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1832250 
50434411050015100 ELKIND MARTIN & DORIS ELKIND DORIS       609,707.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1729350 
50434411050021010 BROCK MAJORIE BROCK MAJORIE QPRT ANDREW #1       730,356.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1517250 
50434411050021020 REZEL MARJAN        367,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385     963900 
50434411050021030 LEVY GERALD H        464,720.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     877800 
50434411050021040 ROSS ERIC &        977,940.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1047900 
50434411050021060 GRABLER PETER & GRABLER WENDY K       1,047,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1047900 
50434411050021070 ENGLER FRANCESCA L        586,142.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     877800 
50434411050021080 SETON ADELE        367,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385     963900 
50434411050021090 ROSEN MARTIN & ROBERT ROSEN ET AL TR HLDRS       730,856.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1517250 
50434411050021100 LEWIN STANLEY & MARJORIE        1,456,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1456350 
50434411050022010 GOLDMAN SARA K L        788,407.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1622250 
50434411050022020 GESLIEN G ERIC & GESLIEN ANNE V       1,016,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1016400 
50434411050022030 CASH RICHARD L EST        417,814.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     930300 
50434411050022040 SHAPIRO HERBERT L & SHAPIRO SELMA M       1,029,440.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1100400 
50434411050022060 GREENBLATT ALLAN        610,686.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1100400 
50434411050022070 SPINAK GEORGE & MARIA        930,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     930300 
50434411050022080 ADLER EDWARD A K & ADLER KAREN S       1,016,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1016400 
50434411050022090 HERMANSON LYDIA        1,622,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1622250 
50434411050022100 SUSSER ARTHUR &        1,298,404.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1561350 
50434411050023010 ABRAHAM ANDREA R        1,622,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1672250 
50434411050023020 MOSS DEBBIE TR        1,036,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1036400 
50434411050023030 MOHR MADELINE MOHR MADELINE TR       418,913.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     950300 
50434411050023040 ZELNIKER ELAINE ZELNIKER ARTHUR       1,070,140.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1142400 
50434411050023050 TACA RITA        513,333.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1981   2816    1017450 
50434411050023060 COLE GLADYS COLE GLADYS TR       611,286.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1142400 
50434411050023070 CRRD ENTERPRISES LLC        950,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     950300 
50434411050023080 MNUCHIN ROBERT TR        2,327,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1981   5664    2327850 
50434411050023100 SIDENA INC        1,611,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1611350 
50434411050024010 MATARASSO ETHEL MATARASSO ALAN TR       1,602,882.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1722250 
50434411050024020 GLUCKSTEIN BRIAN        1,056,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1056400 
50434411050024030 FLEISCHMAN MARTIN & FLEISCHMAN ELEANOR       662,261.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     970300 
50434411050024040 NADLER ALLAN HOLDINGS LTD        1,162,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1162400 
50434411050024050 GOLDBERG G MARSHAL & SANDRA E GOLDBERG REV TRUST       514,434.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1981   2816    1038450 
50434411050024060 REAL ESTATE INVESTORS GROUP        1,162,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1162400 
50434411050024070 COHEN WILLIAM & COHEN BARBARA       749,280.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494     970300 
50434411050024080 BELSKY ROBERT & ROBERT BELSKY TR TITL HLDR       415,014.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1056400 
50434411050024090 PERLMUTTER LAURA        790,942.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1722250 
50434411050024100 SIFF SHIRLEY S        1,341,901.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1661350 
50434411050025010 WOLDOW ROBERT D & SONIA B WOLDOW SONIA B       792,208.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1832250 
50434411050025020 REAL ESTATE INVESTORS GROUP        1,121,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1121400 
50434411050025030 PWMAJ LLC        1,035,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1981   2494    1035300 
50434411050025040 COHEN NORMAN D        1,176,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1268400 
50434411050025050 RATNER A & RATNER DENNIS       1,164,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1981   2816    1164450 
50434411050025060 GELLER SHELDON TRUST FBO & RANDI GARIBALDI       1,268,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1981   3280    1268400 
50434411050025070 1153898 ONTARIO LIMITED        1,035,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1981   2494    1035300 
50434411050025080 PATENT SHIRLEY & SAMUEL R PATENT IRREV TRUST       421,116.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1981   2385    1121400 
50434411050025090 PHILLIPS LEONARD J & GLORIA PHILIPS TR TITL HLDR       804,293.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1981   3262    1832250 
50434411050025100 RAPHAEL STEPHEN & RAPHAEL MARJORIE       1,646,410.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1981   3163    1729350 
50434411050030010 ULRICH INVS (1966) LTD        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030020 PODELL HERBERT & PODELL LORRAINE       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030030 RUSSO IRVING & RAE        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030040 PESHKIN S DAVID & MICHAEL G CHEBUHAR       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030050 MNUCHIN ROBERT TR        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030060 MACKLOWE LLOYD & MACKLOWE BARBARA       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030070 BARTLETT EDWARD J JR TR NANCY G KATZ C/O       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030080 SHAPIRO MILTON S & BEATRICE L        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030090 PERLMUTTER LAURA        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050030100 COUGHLIN DEBRA M        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040010 WOLF JOHN M & WOLF LEATRICE K       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040020 MATARASSO ALAN TR        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040030 GLUCKSTEIN BRIAN        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040040 HERMANSON LYDIA        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040050 RAPHAEL STEPHEN & RAPHAEL MARJORIE       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040060 CASH RICHARD L        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040070 MARVISTA III LLC NATIONAL CORP RESEARCH LTD C/O       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040080 4232321 CANADA INC        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040090 SCHUMAN JEROME B & BOBBE C        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050040100 BELSKY ROBERT & BELSKY MAXINE       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050010 SHORE PAUL & ELLIN GOLDMAN C/O       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050020 ELIAS JACK & ANITA        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050030 TACA HENRY & RITA        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050040 LEVINE LEWIS &        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050050 ROSEN MARTIN        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050060 ABRAHAM ANDREA R        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050070 SCHOUELA SIMONE        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050080 ROBERTS EDWARD        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050090 GOLDBERG SANDRA E        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050100 PHILLIPS LEONARD J TR        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050050110 SIDENA INC        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060010 HOLLENBERG IRA & HOLLENBERG BONNIE       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060020 GELLER SHELDON TRUST FBO & RANDI GARIBALDI       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060030 TIFFAN PALM BEACH CORP        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060040 SHAPIRO PHILIP J & JANET R        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060050 COHEN MAURICE M & MARILYN A        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060060 SIFF SHIRLEY S        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060070 BROCK HERBERT A & MARJORIE        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060080 PATENT SAMUEL R TRUST PATENT ROBERT C TR       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060090 PODELL HERBERT S & LORRAINE        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060100 SUSSER ARTHUR & SUSSER SAUNDRA       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060110 SCHWARTZ ARTHUR        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060120 COHEN NORMAN        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060130 WEINRIB JEROME & NORMA        32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411050060140 FLAMM ALEC & FLAMM MIRIAM       32,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441105 TWO THOUSAND SLOANS CURVE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1981      0      32550 
50434411070000000 SLOANS CURVE HMOWNERS ASSN INC        0.00 1.589 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434411070000000 SLOANS CURVE HMOWNERS ASSN INC        0.00 1.589 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434411070000010 SIDMAN PAULA L        1,927,718.00 0.3766 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4577    2748900 
50434411070000010 SIDMAN PAULA L        1,927,718.00 0.3766 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 1 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4577    2748900 
50434411070000020 BORNSTEIN RICHARD J BORNSTEIN SANDRA       2,099,733.00 0.183 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   5031    3157350 
50434411070000020 BORNSTEIN RICHARD J BORNSTEIN SANDRA       2,099,733.00 0.183 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 2 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   5031    3157350 
50434411070000030 PEARLMAN HERBERT & HERBERT & SHERYL PEARLMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       1,834,388.00 0.186 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4911    3082800 
50434411070000030 PEARLMAN HERBERT & HERBERT & SHERYL PEARLMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       1,834,388.00 0.186 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 3 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4911    3082800 
50434411070000040 BALL LAURA H COVINGTON KATHERINE H       2,288,007.00 0.1872 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3514    2266950 
50434411070000040 BALL LAURA H COVINGTON KATHERINE H       2,288,007.00 0.1872 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3514    2266950 
50434411070000050 HERMAN J MAURICE HERMAN J MAURICE TR       2,974,122.00 0.19 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 5 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   5181    3330600 
50434411070000050 HERMAN J MAURICE HERMAN J MAURICE TR       2,974,122.00 0.19 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 5 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   5181    3330600 
50434411070000060 FOSTER HENRY FOSTER LOIS       2,509,818.00 0.1903 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 6 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3852    2500050 
50434411070000060 FOSTER HENRY FOSTER LOIS       2,509,818.00 0.1903 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 6 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3852    2500050 
50434411070000070 PORTER CONNIE B        2,356,683.00 0.1883 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 7 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3650    2436000 
50434411070000070 PORTER CONNIE B        2,356,683.00 0.1883 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 7 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3650    2436000 
50434411070000080 PEERENBOOM ROBIN        2,718,475.00 0.1887 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 8 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3923    2754150 
50434411070000080 PEERENBOOM ROBIN        2,718,475.00 0.1887 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 8 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3923    2754150 
50434411070000090 ELEVEN SIXTY NINE NINETY FIVE CANADA INC SENATOR E KOLBER C/O       2,742,295.00 0.189 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 9 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4250    2734200 
50434411070000090 ELEVEN SIXTY NINE NINETY FIVE CANADA INC SENATOR E KOLBER C/O       2,742,295.00 0.189 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 9 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4250    2734200 
50434411070000100 RRD ENTERPRISES LLC        2,703,382.00 0.1921 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 10 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4019    2690100 
50434411070000100 RRD ENTERPRISES LLC        2,703,382.00 0.1921 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 10 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4019    2690100 
50434411070000110 11 SLOANS CURVE LLC        4,113,004.00 0.1936 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 11 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4240    4085550 
50434411070000110 11 SLOANS CURVE LLC        4,113,004.00 0.1936 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 11 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4240    4085550 
50434411070000120 LEVENTHAL MURIEL G MURIEL G LEVENTHAL TR HLDR       2,022,577.00 0.1941 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 12 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4630    2916900 
50434411070000120 LEVENTHAL MURIEL G MURIEL G LEVENTHAL TR HLDR       2,022,577.00 0.1941 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 12 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4630    2916900 
50434411070000130 LAWI DAVID S TR &        2,498,636.00 0.1981 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 13 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3823    2481150 
50434411070000130 LAWI DAVID S TR &        2,498,636.00 0.1981 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 13 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   3823    2481150 
50434411070000140 GRANOFF LEONARD GRANOFF PAULA A       1,828,577.00 0.2062 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 14 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4028    2600850 
50434411070000140 GRANOFF LEONARD GRANOFF PAULA A       1,828,577.00 0.2062 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 14 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4028    2600850 
50434411070000150 JENKINS NANCY ELIZABETH TR GWEN BOYKIN C/O       3,067,662.00 0.2265 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 15 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4428    3055500 
50434411070000150 JENKINS NANCY ELIZABETH TR GWEN BOYKIN C/O       3,067,662.00 0.2265 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441107 SLOANS CURVE THS 15 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1981   4428    3055500 
50434411070080010 1155048 ONTARIO INC        1,833,301.00 0.3482 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1990 00 04 00 1     580053       4269       4967       3514                 
50434411070080010 1155048 ONTARIO INC        1,833,301.00 0.3482 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1990 00 04 00 1     580053       4269       4967       3514                 
50434411070080020 RESIDENCES AT SLOANS CURVE INC        0.00 0.2632 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1992 1992 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      82710       1196         
50434411070080020 RESIDENCES AT SLOANS CURVE INC        0.00 0.2632 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1992 1992 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      82710       1196         
50434411070080030 SANDERSON WILLIAM &        1,590,662.00 0.2531 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1990 04 06 00 2     615668       5632       6568       4936                 
50434411070080030 SANDERSON WILLIAM &        1,590,662.00 0.2531 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1990 04 06 00 2     615668       5632       6568       4936                 
50434411070080040 MATHESON MONIQUE D & MATHESON WILLIAM       877,693.00 0.2695 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 05 07 00 2     667393       6100       7095       5475                 
50434411070080040 MATHESON MONIQUE D & MATHESON WILLIAM       877,693.00 0.2695 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1982 05 07 00 2     667393       6100       7095       5475                 
50434411070080050 SIDELL BARBARA C        1,740,480.00 0.2885 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 04 04 01 2     751103       5489       5899       5066                 
50434411070080050 SIDELL BARBARA C        1,740,480.00 0.2885 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1984 04 04 01 2     751103       5489       5899       5066                 
50434411070080060 POSTAL ELAINE        763,761.00 0.3565 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1985 03 04 00 1     536914       3963       4396       3448                 
50434411070080060 POSTAL ELAINE        763,761.00 0.3565 SINGLE FAMILY 1982 1985 03 04 00 1     536914       3963       4396       3448                 
50434411070080070 GREENBERG NATHAN GREENBERG BARBARA       857,767.00 0.2932 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1985 04 05 00 2     639871       4764       5176       4325                 
50434411070080070 GREENBERG NATHAN GREENBERG BARBARA       857,767.00 0.2932 SINGLE FAMILY 1984 1985 04 05 00 2     639871       4764       5176       4325                 
50434411070080080 SLOANE MARSHALL M SLOANE BARBARA J       2,089,777.00 0.3894 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1985 00 06 00 2     768986       6990       7874       6354                 
50434411070080080 SLOANE MARSHALL M SLOANE BARBARA J       2,089,777.00 0.3894 SINGLE FAMILY 1983 1985 00 06 00 2     768986       6990       7874       6354                 
50434414010010010 STEIN CECILE        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010020 HERWITZ CARLA B        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010030 LAMBERTSON RICHARD & TRUEX JOHN B       31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010040 MULLIN ROBIN C        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010050 JEFFNAN INVESTMENTS LTD        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010060 EPSTEIN WILLIAM & JEANNETTE        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010070 JACOBS ETHEL O TR        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010080 MATTHEWS WILLIAM        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010090 BLAIR SANDRA        31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010100 KALB SANFORD & KALB FRANCINE       31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010010110 BLOOMBERG REALTY CO HARVEY S BLOOMBERG C/O       31,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1974      0      31500 
50434414010011010 GLICK EUGENE B & MARILYN K TRS        1,335,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1974   3736    1335600 
50434414010011020 JACOBS ETHEL O JACOBS ETHEL O TR       144,690.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     439950 
50434414010011030 EPSTEIN WILLIAM & JEANNETTE        428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     428400 
50434414010011040 STEIN CECILE        499,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     499800 
50434414010011050 BIRNBACH GERALD M & MIRIAM        499,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     499800 
50434414010011060 MARX PETER S        428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     428400 
50434414010011070 KAPLAN SEYMOUR D & JOSEPH D KAPLAN & SON C/O       439,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     439950 
50434414010012010 BLAIR J RODNEY & SANDRA BLAIR SANDRA       286,336.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     721350 
50434414010012020 SHAFFER THOMAS W        460,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     460950 
50434414010012030 KAPLAN CHARLES I TR        449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     449400 
50434414010012040 LACHOW NATE & NORMA        520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     520800 
50434414010012050 MILLER ERIK J &        520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     520800 
50434414010012060 WASSERMAN RICHARD L &        449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     449400 
50434414010012070 KOSOW D & KOSOW ANNE M       139,665.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     460950 
50434414010012080 MATTHEWS WILLIAM        657,610.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     721350 
50434414010013010 LAMBERTSON RICHARD TRUEX JOHN B       741,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     741350 
50434414010013020 JEFFNAN INVESTMENTS LTD        470,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     470950 
50434414010013030 LAZARUS TADD        459,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     459400 
50434414010013040 KATZ LEWIS L & GOLDSTEIN GABRIELA       530,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     530800 
50434414010013050 RIMER JOHN & ANITA RIMER ANITA       176,262.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     530800 
50434414010013060 WEINBERG BERENICE S & STEWART ELIZABETH       140,922.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     459400 
50434414010013070 KALB SANFORD & KALB FRANCINE       470,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     470950 
50434414010013080 KATZ LEWIS & GOLDSTEIN GABRIELA       691,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     741350 
50434414010020010 BENJAMIN ROGER E PROPTY TRUST KEY BANK TR       29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020020 HERZOG DRAGUTIN & ALICE        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020030 ROSOFF MARY &        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020040 MEYERS MITCHELL S & MEYERS JACQUELINE       29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020050 READING RICHARD B        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020060 WEINBERG BERENICE S & STEWART ELIZABETH       29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020070 BLANK REUVEN &        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020080 GLICK E B & MARILYN K TRS        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020090 KOSOW J & LEE S        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020100 CAHN JANE MAREN        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010020110 COE ARNOLD S        29,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1974      0      29400 
50434414010021010 SHAPIRO PHYLLIS G TRUST SHAPIRO PHYLLIS G TR       679,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     679350 
50434414010021020 JOYCE LEONARD S        439,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     439950 
50434414010021030 BLANK REUVEN & BLANK NATALIE       378,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     428400 
50434414010021040 BOREY MARLENE FRADA        328,575.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     499800 
50434414010021050 SHELDON SAMUEL B & GLORIA R        499,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     499800 
50434414010021060 POLINGER GERALDINE TR        428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     428400 
50434414010021070 ECKMAN GEORGE & GWENDOLYN        439,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     439950 
50434414010021080 WEAN RAYMOND J III &        679,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     679350 
50434414010022010 TOLL EVELYN        223,541.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     721350 
50434414010022020 WEAN SUSANNE C        460,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     460950 
50434414010022030 YONTEF MARVIN        449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     449400 
50434414010022040 GENSER JOAN        887,650.00  CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1974   3736     937650 
50434414010022060 ROTH KENNETH        449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     449400 
50434414010022070 RAFANIELLO RALPH RAFANIELLO GEORGANNA       460,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     460950 
50434414010022080 BLOOMBERG REALTY CO ROBERT KARGMAN C/O       721,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     721350 
50434414010023010 HERWITZ CARLA B        975,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1974   2910    1158150 
50434414010023030 LANDLE CHARLES LANDLE CHARLES TR       404,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     459400 
50434414010023040 PALACOROLLA THOMAS A & PALACOROLLA BARBARA J       530,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     530800 
50434414010023050 KOSOW LEE S        170,870.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1974   1868     530800 
50434414010023060 LINDT MARY        459,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     459400 
50434414010023070 BENJAMIN ROGER E KEY BANK NA TR       1,108,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1974   2910    1158150 
50434414010030010 WOODY WILLIAM J SR TR        30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974      0      30450 
50434414010030020 AMDORSKY EVELYN EST VICTORIA JARRAS C/O       30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974      0      30450 
50434414010030030 COON MILES A        30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1974      0      30450 
50434414010030040 METZ MERYL ANN        30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1974      0      30450 
50434414010031010 MERJANIAN ELENA TRUST 2003 MERJANIAN ELENA TR       284,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1974    978     284550 
50434414010031020 ULRICH AXEL        375,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     375900 
50434414010031030 ROSENBERG KENNETH J        375,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     375900 
50434414010031040 ROSOFF MARY & ROSOFF PAUL M       499,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1974   1853     499800 
50434414010031050 2275 SOUTH OCEAN BLVD UNIT 105A TRUST JARRAS VICTORIA & HEDY JARRAS TRS       428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1974   1606     428400 
50434414010031060 DYER THOMAS E SR & DYER SHEILA B       184,913.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1974   1853     499800 
50434414010031070 MERSENTES ALEXANDER        375,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     375900 
50434414010031080 GOBERMAN DOROTHY GOBERMAN DOROTHY LIVING TRUST       140,422.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     375900 
50434414010032010 KAHN JOSEPH JR & KAHN MURIEL H       295,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1974    978     295050 
50434414010032020 LERNER RICHARD & RUTH LERNER RUTH       139,665.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     386400 
50434414010032030 HOLTZ ROSLYN        386,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     386400 
50434414010032040 CRUGER WILLIAM F & CRUGER ANGELA B       520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1974   1853     520800 
50434414010032050 MEYERS MITCHELL S & MEYERS JACQUELINE       449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1974   1606     449400 
50434414010032060 HERZOG ALICE        169,647.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1974   1853     520800 
50434414010032070 KRAKOWER JUDITH R        386,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     386400 
50434414010032080 VETROMILE MARIA G        386,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     386400 
50434414010032090 STOLMAN STEVEN S & YOUNG JOHN W       93,807.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1974    978     295050 
50434414010033010 METZ MERYL ANN        300,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1974    978     300050 
50434414010033020 FRIEDMAN JEFFREY A        391,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     391400 
50434414010033030 ROSENSTOCK ALICE EST        144,690.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     391400 
50434414010033040 ADLER JONATHAN & CAROLE GRAYES C/O       530,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1974   1853     530800 
50434414010033050 READING RICHARD B        459,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1974   1606     459400 
50434414010033060 ECKSTEIN HARRIETT        530,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1974   1853     530800 
50434414010033070 RICCA BITTAN NINETTE        391,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     391400 
50434414010033080 UDELL STANLEY W &        277,314.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1974   1614     391400 
50434414010033090 CROMARTY PETER        300,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1974    978     300050 
50434414010040010 CHANNING SUSAN S        470,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1974   1519     520800 
50434414010040020 SHULMAN HARRY        520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1974   1519     520800 
50434414010040030 MULLIN ROBIN C        520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1974   1519     520800 
50434414010040040 THEISE LEE & THEISE RICHARD P       520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1974   1519     520800 
50434414010040050 COON MILES A        520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1974   1519     520800 
50434414010040060 CAHN JANE MAREN        520,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1974   1519     520800 
50434414010040070 COE ARNOLD S        151,019.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441401 REEF CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1974   1519     520800 
50434414020010010 WEISS JEFFREY N &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010020 CHERNIS PETER G CHERNIS MARCIA L       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010030 KOFFMAN MILTON A        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010040 GOLDBERG STEPHEN H & GOLDBERG BETSY S       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010050 GECHT FRANCEY TRUST 2007 &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010060 BARRON BARBARA S        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010070 ALPERIN MARK R & JUDITH E KING TRS       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010080 BORN J J        20,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010090 GELFOND RICHARD L        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020010100 STEIN HELEN R TR        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020011010 KIERNAN GREGORY & KIERNAN VERA       1,334,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1334550 
50434414020011020 ROPIL HOLDINGS LIMITED        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     785400 
50434414020011030 GOOTRAD HELEN        772,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     772800 
50434414020011040 GOLDBERG ALAN R & GOLDBERG LESLIE B       1,152,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1152900 
50434414020011050 BAHNKEN JOHN R &        1,152,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1152900 
50434414020011060 WEISS JEFFREY N &        772,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     772800 
50434414020011070 BENGLOFF ROBERT &        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     785400 
50434414020011080 CLARKE CARTER W JR & ATHANS IRENE       1,279,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1334550 
50434414020012010 MANNING MERVYN H        1,389,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1439550 
50434414020012020 KULLEN SOL        532,076.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     837900 
50434414020012030 MICHELMAN JAY &        825,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     825300 
50434414020012040 GOLODETZ HANNAH M        780,028.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1257900 
50434414020012050 GEORGAS JOHN W GEORGAS JOHN W TR       1,257,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1257900 
50434414020012060 GLASER LORRAINE        825,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     825300 
50434414020012070 BORN J J        837,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     837900 
50434414020012080 CHERNIS PETER G CHERNIS MARCIA L       1,389,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1439550 
50434414020013010 STEIN HELEN R STEIN HELEN R TR       1,169,358.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1489550 
50434414020013020 KANDERS JEANNE & KANDERS RALPH       439,279.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     857900 
50434414020013030 EIGHT 74628 ONTARIO INC        845,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     845300 
50434414020013040 FILENBAUM NANCY A        781,295.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1362900 
50434414020013050 GECHT FRANCEY TRUST 2007 &        1,362,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1362900 
50434414020013060 ARRASCUE JOSE        632,901.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     845300 
50434414020013070 HULNICK BARBARA B        542,989.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     857900 
50434414020013080 ALPERIN MARK R & JUDITH E KING TRS       1,489,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1489550 
50434414020014010 DAVIDOW ROBERT & DAVIDOW HIROKO       1,489,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1539550 
50434414020014020 FISHMAN HARRY & GLORIA        877,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     877900 
50434414020014030 GREER JANE        865,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     865300 
50434414020014040 BERGMAN JUDITH B        783,061.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1412900 
50434414020014050 ROMANO FLORENCE TR        1,412,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1412900 
50434414020014060 LEHMAN JOSEPH L & JOAN S LEHMAN JOAN S       440,426.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     865300 
50434414020014070 CRUZ EVARISTO G & CRUZ ELAINE       877,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     877900 
50434414020014080 GELFOND RICHARD L        1,484,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1539550 
50434414020015010 LANGFAN WILLIAM R & LANGFAN MARION &       792,208.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1589550 
50434414020015020 HERMAN JOAN M        441,577.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     897900 
50434414020015030 KAROFSKY GALE        654,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     885300 
50434414020015040 RITTENBERG BERNARD & RITTENBERG LORRAINE       1,462,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1462900 
50434414020015050 KOFFMAN MILTON A        1,088,099.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1462900 
50434414020015060 GOLDMAN BERNICE        441,077.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     885300 
50434414020015070 GOLDBERG STEPHEN H &        643,776.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     897900 
50434414020015080 LATTMAN NORMAN        1,539,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1589550 
50434414020016010 BIRNBACH GERALD & BIRNBACH MIRIAM       1,702,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1702050 
50434414020016020 BARRON BARBARA        942,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     942900 
50434414020016030 BENZAQUEN NORMAN & BENZAQUEN DIANA       930,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     930300 
50434414020016040 MILO AMOS & ANA ANA MILO       884,974.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1572900 
50434414020016050 ROUSSO ELI L & JULIA        1,572,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1572900 
50434414020016060 MORRIS FLORENCE S        442,723.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     930300 
50434414020016070 WEISS EDITH & JOSEPH T TRS        942,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     942900 
50434414020016080 MENOWITZ SUZANNE G        1,652,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1702050 
50434414020020010 ROPIL HOLDINGS LIMITED        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020020 BARON LEONARD & JOAN        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020030 BENZAQUEN NORMAN & BENZAQUEN DIANA       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020040 DAVIDOW ROBERT & DAVIDOW HIROKO       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020050 KALNICK MICHAEL C        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020060 ROSENBLATT MOE N &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020070 WINTER ROBIN O & CHERYL W LEWY C/O       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020080 SALSTONE ALYNE D TRUST        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020090 SCHUR KENNETH &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020020100 MILO AMOS & ANA        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020021010 RUBIN JACQUES R & JACQUES R RUBIN TR TITL HLDR       1,284,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1334550 
50434414020021020 DAVIDSON ELIZABETH R        785,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     785400 
50434414020021030 PR STEVENS LLC CEIL SCHNEIDER RANDELL C/O       772,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     772800 
50434414020021040 COMENITZ ELLIOT & COMENITZ NANCY       1,152,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1152900 
50434414020021050 SCHAFFER MELVYN S & ANN R        1,152,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1152900 
50434414020021060 KRONFELD FELICE E        360,413.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     772800 
50434414020021070 SEGAL IDAJANE SEGAL IDAJANE TR       752,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     802200 
50434414020021080 LISHEN INC        1,446,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1446900 
50434414020022010 ROSENBLATT MOE N & ROSENBLATT JERRI       788,407.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1439550 
50434414020022020 ALBERT WILLIAM & ALBERT NINA       787,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     837900 
50434414020022030 BITENSKY SAMSON & BITENSKY HALINA       825,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     825300 
50434414020022040 WINTER ROBIN O & WINTER ALAN A &       1,257,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1257900 
50434414020022050 MILLER SYDNEY & MILLER LORRIANE       1,257,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1257900 
50434414020022060 HOFFSTOT HENRY P JR & THAYER D H UNTERMAN       825,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     825300 
50434414020022070 PEERENBOOM ROBIN        854,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     854700 
50434414020022080 WINGATE DAVID A & SHOSHANNA L WINGATE ET AL TRS       1,551,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1551900 
50434414020023010 HUNTER NATALIE        789,672.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1489550 
50434414020023020 RACHESKY ROBERT & RACHESKY SYLVIA       807,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     857900 
50434414020023030 KALNICK MICHAEL C        825,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     825300 
50434414020023040 DILSHEIMER BARBARA R & FELDMAN DANA       1,362,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1362900 
50434414020023050 GOLDBERG CHARLOTTE GOLDBERG ALAN TR       917,546.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1362900 
50434414020023060 KAMENSTEIN SLOAN & KAMENSTEIN CAROL       845,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     845300 
50434414020023070 SALSTONE ALYNE D SALSTONE ALYNE TR       824,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     874700 
50434414020023080 FISHER SHEILA A        789,672.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1601900 
50434414020024010 GILMAN MARCIA R        790,942.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1539550 
50434414020024020 FISHER REGINA        877,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     877900 
50434414020024030 SUSSMAN MARION RES TRUST II SUSSMAN ANDREW TRUSTEE &       865,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     865300 
50434414020024040 STEINBERG MYRON E & MYRON E STEINBERG ET AL TR HLDRS       1,101,540.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1412900 
50434414020024050 GREENBERG FRANCES L        833,102.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1412900 
50434414020024060 WOLF CHARLOTTE        865,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     865300 
50434414020024070 SCHUR KENNETH &        894,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     894700 
50434414020024080 ROME CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC MICHAEL S ROME C/O       1,651,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1651900 
50434414020025010 WEINSTEIN WENDY R & WEINSTEIN CLIFF J       1,589,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1589550 
50434414020025020 COHEN CLAIRE COHEN CLAIRE TR       642,807.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     897900 
50434414020025030 LAMONTE SIDNEY & PHYLLIS LAMONTE PHYLLIS       441,577.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     885300 
50434414020025040 YAEGER BETTY S        1,462,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1462900 
50434414020025050 SILVERMAN MARILYN        1,088,099.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1462900 
50434414020025060 MATZNER EDWARD ESTATE MARCIA KAHAN C/O       885,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     885300 
50434414020025070 ODERMATT FRANCOIS & JUSTER DIANE       914,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     914700 
50434414020025080 BARON LEONARD & JOAN BARON JOAN       792,208.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1701900 
50434414020026010 OTTO JONATHAN & OTTO EILEEN J       1,702,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1702050 
50434414020026020 DEUTSCH IRWIN F        442,723.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     942900 
50434414020026030 ELIAS CHARLOTTE        442,223.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     930300 
50434414020026040 OSTROW RONALD & OSTROW BATSHEVA       1,522,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1572900 
50434414020026050 ASSATLY ROBERT &        1,522,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1980   3136    1572900 
50434414020026060 WOGALTER HARRY & WOGALTER BARBARA       880,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1980   2494     930300 
50434414020026070 OTTO JONATHAN METRO CAPITAL HOLDINGS C/O       959,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1980   2385     959700 
50434414020026080 HABER R BONNIE & MURIEL HABER       1,925,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1980   3107    1814400 
50434414020030010 BENGLOFF ROBERT        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030020 OTTO JONATHAN & OTTO EILEEN J       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030030 SCHAFFER MELVYN S & ANN R        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030040 ROMANO FLORENCE TRUST ROMANO FLORENCE TRUSTEE       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030050 BIRNBACH GERALD & BIRNBACH MIRIAM       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030060 MANNING MERVYN        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030070 WOGALTER HARRY &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030080 DEUTSCH IRWIN F        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030090 COHEN CLAIRE TRUSTEE CJC SLOANS CURVE LAND TRUST       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030100 FISHER SHEILA A        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020030110 KULLEN SOL & KULLEN SHIRLEY R       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040010 ROME CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC MICHAEL S ROME C/O       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040020 GOLODETZ VICKI TR        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040030 COMENITZ ELLIOT & COMENITZ NANCY       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040040 GREENBERG FRANCES L TR        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040050 WINGATE DAVID A & SHOSHANNA L WINGATE ET AL TRS       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040060 ARRASCUE JOSE F        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040070 YAEGER BETTY S        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040080 ASSATLY ROBERT &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040090 HUNTER NATALIE        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040100 HABER R BONNIE & MURIEL HABER       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040110 FISHMAN HARRY & GLORIA        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040120 DILSHEIMER BARBARA R & FELDMAN DANA       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040130 BERGMAN JUDITH B        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040140 GOLDBERG MURRAY & GOLDBERG CHARLOTTE       27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414020040150 GEORGAS JOHN W TR        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441402 TWENTY ONE HUNDRED SLOANS  CURVE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1980      0      27300 
50434414030000010 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 3.09 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1982 1982 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      23640        300         
50434414030000010 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 3.09 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1982 1982 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      23640        300         
50434414030000060 2320 INVESTORS INC        2,524,727.00 0.79 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 00 00 00 2     728081       7111       7378       6929                 
50434414030000060 2320 INVESTORS INC        2,524,727.00 0.79 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1990 00 00 00 2     728081       7111       7378       6929                 
50434414030000070 KHAWLY TERESA K & KHAWLY MARY T       805,867.00 0.04 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1980 02 02 00 1     142859       1994       2135       1734                 
50434414030000070 KHAWLY TERESA K & KHAWLY MARY T       805,867.00 0.04 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1980 02 02 00 1     142859       1994       2135       1734                 
50434414030000080 GEESEY LISA S        482,023.00 0.06 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1980 00 00 00 1     137787       1923       2020       1698                 
50434414030000080 GEESEY LISA S        482,023.00 0.06 SINGLE FAMILY 1945 1980 00 00 00 1     137787       1923       2020       1698                 
50434414030010010 COHEN BABETTE G & COHEN CARMEL J       824,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS 1-A 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030010010 COHEN BABETTE G & COHEN CARMEL J       824,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS 1-A 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030010020 CLARK JOHN B JOHN B CLARK TR HLDR       372,628.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030010020 CLARK JOHN B JOHN B CLARK TR HLDR       372,628.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030010030 GOLDFEIN LAURENCE & GOLDFEIN SUSAN       853,594.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030010030 GOLDFEIN LAURENCE & GOLDFEIN SUSAN       853,594.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030010040 WUNSCH BEN WUNSCH BEN TR       393,418.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS 4-A 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     796950 
50434414030010040 WUNSCH BEN WUNSCH BEN TR       393,418.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS 4-A 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     796950 
50434414030020050 CRAMPTON LEWIS &        874,594.00 0.0486 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030020050 CRAMPTON LEWIS &        874,594.00 0.0486 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030020060 KUMAR DEEP & SINHA NIDHI       854,594.00 0.0486 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030020060 KUMAR DEEP & SINHA NIDHI       854,594.00 0.0486 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030020070 CAPORRINO DOUGLAS J & MALIZIA CAROL A       874,594.00 0.0481 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030020070 CAPORRINO DOUGLAS J & MALIZIA CAROL A       874,594.00 0.0481 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030030080 BEIL KAREN M BEIL LEO J       802,094.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS C-8 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     796950 
50434414030030080 BEIL KAREN M BEIL LEO J       802,094.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS C-8 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     796950 
50434414030030090 BENNETT BERNARD        357,121.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030030090 BENNETT BERNARD        357,121.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030030100 DEVINS ROBERT S        371,403.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030030100 DEVINS ROBERT S        371,403.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030030110 ROSE PALMS LLC        874,594.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030030110 ROSE PALMS LLC        874,594.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030040120 ROSENBLOOM JOANNE & ROSENBLOOM HOWARD       393,418.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030040120 ROSENBLOOM JOANNE & ROSENBLOOM HOWARD       393,418.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030040130 MCNERNEY JAMIE H &        803,858.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS D-13 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030040130 MCNERNEY JAMIE H &        803,858.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS D-13 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030040140 BENNETT MARGARET P &        748,813.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030040140 BENNETT MARGARET P &        748,813.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030040150 OCCPEK ANTHONY S        874,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030040150 OCCPEK ANTHONY S        874,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030050160 ROSS SYDNEY L & ROSS ELIZABETH C       874,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030050160 ROSS SYDNEY L & ROSS ELIZABETH C       874,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030050170 GREIFINGER DAVID J & NANCY K        853,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030050170 GREIFINGER DAVID J & NANCY K        853,594.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030050180 ECKSTEIN HARRIETT M        537,023.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS E-18 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030050180 ECKSTEIN HARRIETT M        537,023.00 0.0484 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS E-18 0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     849450 
50434414030050190 PELTZ ARVIN        753,963.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414030050190 PELTZ ARVIN        753,963.00 0.0483 TOWNHOUSE/VILLA                   5043441403 TRES VIDAS OF PALM BEACH THS  0410 TOWNHOUSE 1982   2810     870450 
50434414040000000 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1959        125 
50434414040002010 RUBIN DEBORAH        127,018.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     537600 
50434414040002020 COOPER ALBERT        275,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275100 
50434414040002030 KOTLER JULIAN & ELAINE S        275,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2030 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275100 
50434414040002040 OFFMAN RITA        275,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2040 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275100 
50434414040002050 STERN SYLVIA C        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2050 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     207900 
50434414040002060 HALTON TERRENCE & RONALD HALTON & DEBBIE WEISS       207,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2060 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     207900 
50434414040002070 BEVZ OLEG & BEVZ SVETLANA       155,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1047     155400 
50434414040002080 MITCHELL WILLIAM J        256,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     256200 
50434414040002090 REEF BOBBI G        70,497.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     391650 
50434414040002100 KOBRICK ROSE EST SAUL KOBRICK C/O       70,497.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2100 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     380100 
50434414040002110 ALPERSTEIN EDITH ALPERSTEIN ARTHUR       239,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     239400 
50434414040002120 KLEIN DAVID J        239,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     239400 
50434414040002140 HELD MARC L & SHANE HELD DEBORAH       239,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     239400 
50434414040002150 LANYON GENEVIEVE R        239,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     239400 
50434414040002160 GANTLEY CHRISTOPHER J        252,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     252000 
50434414040002170 BULAN TOBY LEE        341,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     391650 
50434414040002180 MILLER JEROME MILLER FRANCES       50,217.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     256200 
50434414040002190 BERNSTEIN CLAIRE L        49,717.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     256200 
50434414040002200 FEIGENSON LILLIAN EST        207,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     207900 
50434414040002210 BRISKMAN IRA        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     207900 
50434414040002220 CONTI JAMES M CONTI JAMES M TR       220,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275100 
50434414040002230 ALDRIDGE ALFRED P & ALDRIDGE LINDA       275,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275100 
50434414040002240 FEDERBUSH ELSA EST        275,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275100 
50434414040002250 GREENBERG MITCHELL & SMALL PHYLLIS       164,135.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 2250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     537600 
50434414040003010 PHILLIPS JERROLD & PHILLIPS ROBERTA L       142,838.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3010 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     527100 
50434414040003020 DAYAN SALOMON        280,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280100 
50434414040003030 SINGER DONALD & SINGER SYLVIA       230,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280100 
50434414040003040 FINKELSTEIN LYNN        55,917.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280100 
50434414040003050 DAYAN RENE        212,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     212900 
50434414040003060 BUCKLEY P J JANE NASH C/O       212,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     212900 
50434414040003070 STARK RENEE A        211,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     261200 
50434414040003080 RICHLER MAUREEN S        261,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     261200 
50434414040003090 COHEN ESTELLE R FAMILY OFFICE MANAGEMENT C/O       396,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     396650 
50434414040003100 KATZ SAMUEL DAVID KATZ C/O       385,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     385100 
50434414040003110 GROSSMAN JAMES D & RONA        244,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     244400 
50434414040003120 ROSEN CAROL        194,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     244400 
50434414040003140 LERMAN JONA & ANNY LERMAN ANNY       47,725.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     244400 
50434414040003150 FEINBERG MIMI L EST STEPHEN J FEINBERG C/O       244,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     244400 
50434414040003160 FALK SYLVIA        105,221.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     257000 
50434414040003170 CARUSO MARIO &        396,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     396650 
50434414040003180 SARDINA BOB        261,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     261200 
50434414040003190 SILVER PAUL &        261,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     261200 
50434414040003200 ENGEL JERZY        212,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     212900 
50434414040003210 POMPILIO KENNETH        212,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     212900 
50434414040003220 PERLINE IRVING & PERLINE BRIGETTE       280,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280100 
50434414040003230 STRAUS MARJORIE        280,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280100 
50434414040003240 WELLS ROBERT L & EVELYN        280,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280100 
50434414040003250 COOPER MARTIN R        547,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 3250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     547600 
50434414040004010 ADELMAN HARVEY & ADELMAN DONNA J       578,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4010 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     578550 
50434414040004020 GERSTEIN IRVING & MURIEL        317,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     317100 
50434414040004030 CABOT MELANIE        256,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4030 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     306600 
50434414040004040 GLORSKY RONALD P GLORSKY MAXINE       256,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4040 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     306600 
50434414040004050 KRONEN JERILYN        239,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4050 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     239400 
50434414040004060 WARTELS ELIAS JANE TIGER C/O       239,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4060 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     239400 
50434414040004070 BECKERMAN SYLVIA        50,786.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     292950 
50434414040004080 PADNES PATRICIA M PADNES PATRICIA M TR       292,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     292950 
50434414040004090 WEINSTEIN FREDERIC & WEINSTEIN SERENA       433,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     433650 
50434414040004100 COPLAND HELEN W EST KENNETH I STEIN PR C/O       401,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     401100 
50434414040004110 BOLAFFI JANICE L & JANICE BOLAFFI TR TITL HLDR       210,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     260400 
50434414040004120 ONEILL JOHN & CATHERINE        260,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     260400 
50434414040004140 FEINMAN TRUDY        260,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     260400 
50434414040004150 GARCIA RAFAEL        210,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     260400 
50434414040004160 WASSERMAN MICHELE J TRUST WASSERMAN MICHELE J TR       273,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     273000 
50434414040004170 MILBERG ALVIN Y & MILBERG SYLVIA L       73,135.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     412650 
50434414040004180 BROWN JOSEPHINE BROWN JAY A TR       72,216.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     277200 
50434414040004190 RACUSIN ELAINE S        52,356.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     277200 
50434414040004200 DAVIS HENRIETTA        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     218400 
50434414040004210 MONTOURIS GEORGE &        218,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     218400 
50434414040004220 LEICHT LINDA L        131,471.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     285600 
50434414040004230 KEMPER SYLVIA EST        285,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     285600 
50434414040004240 DEL GAUDIO ANNE H DEL GAUDIO ANNE H TR       245,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     296100 
50434414040004250 TABAKIN STEWART & FIUMARA SALVATORE       557,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 4250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     557600 
50434414040005010 MORICONI LILY BETH        130,726.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5010 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     588550 
50434414040005020 BIRGER ELEANOR R        58,055.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     322100 
50434414040005030 LEIDERMAN ABRAHAM        311,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5030 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     311600 
50434414040005040 HAMMER ROBIN J L        311,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5040 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     311600 
50434414040005050 SCHWARTZ MICHAEL A & BOUDREAU DEBORAH L       244,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5050 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     244400 
50434414040005060 KRAMER BERNICE        244,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5060 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     244400 
50434414040005070 SUCHMAN ETHEL EST LESLIE J SUCHMAN C/O       297,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     297950 
50434414040005080 MURRAY EUGENE & ARMSTRONG HELEN       297,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     297950 
50434414040005090 CARROLL NONIE        225,531.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     438650 
50434414040005100 FINE JOEL H & FINE ADELE E       350,670.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     406100 
50434414040005110 GILLMAN BERNARD EST IRA HOLLENBERG C/O       265,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     265400 
50434414040005120 OSTROV GLADYS H EST ROTHSCHILD ELIZABETH  C/O       265,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     265400 
50434414040005140 KATES CELIA EST & BARASH SANDRA C/O       265,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     265400 
50434414040005150 COLEMAN RUTH D        49,363.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     265400 
50434414040005160 VERDUCCI PHYLLIS        51,856.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     278000 
50434414040005170 KAHN JOYCE G KAHN JOYCE G TR       367,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     417650 
50434414040005180 VEINISH E H & JACQUELINE        282,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     282200 
50434414040005190 HOFFERT DANIEL & CONSTANCE HOFFERT CONSTANCE       53,424.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     282200 
50434414040005200 RATHSACK BAERBEL        172,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     223400 
50434414040005210 REHL W RICHARD & REHL ALICIA S       223,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     223400 
50434414040005220 SAKS JUDITH TR        290,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     290600 
50434414040005230 GOLDSTEIN MERRYL & GOLDSTEIN NORMAN       290,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     290600 
50434414040005240 JACOBY JEANNE W        57,555.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     301100 
50434414040005250 BERKEN HARRY & BERKEN SYLVIA       567,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 5250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     567600 
50434414040006010 COHN CLAIRE C/O LISA COHN       598,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6010 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     598550 
50434414040006020 MANDREA EUGENE MANDREA ROCHELLE       327,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     327100 
50434414040006030 KRONER VIVIAN G        266,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6030 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     316600 
50434414040006040 SAREZKY ROSLYN        316,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 604 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     316600 
50434414040006050 FIGUEROA TERESITA & FIGUEROA GUILLERMO       249,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6050 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     249400 
50434414040006060 KAUFMAN HYMAN E & RUTH        249,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6060 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     249400 
50434414040006070 BERKIS ARLENE        302,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     302950 
50434414040006080 MOUALLEM SALEH E & MOUALLEM VICTORIA       302,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     302950 
50434414040006090 CESTARI ROBERT A        134,657.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     443650 
50434414040006100 FRITZHAND RUTH        411,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6100 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     411100 
50434414040006110 LEVINE LAWRENCE R        270,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     270400 
50434414040006120 JACOBS EUNICE        68,862.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     270400 
50434414040006140 STEIN HENRY R TRUST EST STEIN RICHARD C/O       270,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     270400 
50434414040006150 ENGEL PETER & ENGEL ELIZABETH G       270,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     270400 
50434414040006160 ZINN FREDERIC M & ZINN CAROLYNN A       283,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     283000 
50434414040006170 SCHWARTZ STANLEY        119,564.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     422650 
50434414040006180 BERKERY JAMES & BERKERY GAIL       287,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     287200 
50434414040006190 GARCIA RAFAEL        71,236.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     287200 
50434414040006200 GARFEIN ESTELLE        41,406.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     228400 
50434414040006210 HOWARD BRUCE E & HOWARD ALICE B       228,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     228400 
50434414040006220 BRAVERMAN BERNARD        295,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     295600 
50434414040006230 KUYKENDALL H G & KATHERINE KUYKENDALL KATHERINE       91,775.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     295600 
50434414040006240 BRAMOWITZ ALAN D & BRAMOWITZ MARSHA W       306,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     306100 
50434414040006250 KLORFEIN JANE        527,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 6250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     577600 
50434414040007010 ROSENBAUM MAX & BELLE ROSENBAUM       133,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7010 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     608550 
50434414040007020 BENENSON CLAIRE B        332,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     332100 
50434414040007030 SILBY BARBARA O        321,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7030 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     321600 
50434414040007040 CHAPMAN BARBARA BARBARA CHAPMAN TR HLDR       92,847.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7040 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     321600 
50434414040007050 PERILLO JOSEPH        254,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7050 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     254400 
50434414040007060 GRAYSON PAUL        254,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7060 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     254400 
50434414040007070 BERMAN NADINE ALLES CORP C/O       307,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     307950 
50434414040007080 HERBLUM ALEX & HILDA HERBLUM HILDA       72,304.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     307950 
50434414040007090 KAUFMAN EDWARD & KAUFMAN ZONA       448,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     448650 
50434414040007100 MCDONALD JOHN J MCDONALD BARBARA C       120,492.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7100 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     416100 
50434414040007110 KOUSIS ERNEST A & CHRISTINA        275,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275400 
50434414040007120 LASKY LILA        130,971.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275400 
50434414040007140 KAHN PAULA A EST        275,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275400 
50434414040007150 COHEN EDWARD B        275,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     275400 
50434414040007160 DRITZ JAMES L & DRITZ ROLLYN       288,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     288000 
50434414040007170 DI FEO SAM C        427,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     427650 
50434414040007180 RAITZIN LUDMILA        292,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     292200 
50434414040007190 GLUCKMAN EVELYN C GLUCKMAN EVELYN C TR       75,721.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     292200 
50434414040007200 WALEGA DAVID        233,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     233400 
50434414040007210 GOLDSTEIN HAROLD & JEAN        233,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     233400 
50434414040007220 GERALDINE M FIELD TR AGREEMENT        300,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     300600 
50434414040007230 CITRIN BETTY        300,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     300600 
50434414040007240 HILL DON & HILL JEAN       311,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     311100 
50434414040007250 FOX IRA & FOX ELSA       587,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 7250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     587600 
50434414040008010 GRANOFF MARVIN L & MOLLY        618,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8010 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     618550 
50434414040008020 KAPLAN CONSTANCE E KAPLAN RICHARD E TR       281,664.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     337100 
50434414040008030 BRENNER LEO & JUNE R JUNE R BRENNER       93,915.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8030 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     326600 
50434414040008040 KURTZ TED E KURTZ TED E TR       98,643.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8040 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     326600 
50434414040008050 KURTZ TED KURTZ TED E TR       259,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8050 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     259400 
50434414040008060 GORDON ROBERT E & GORDON MARILYN A       259,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8060 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     259400 
50434414040008070 SIMON SUSANNE M        312,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     312950 
50434414040008080 BUCK JACQUELINE A BUCK JACQUELINE A TR       76,890.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     312950 
50434414040008090 STAPF CARL & ZARETTA        453,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     453650 
50434414040008100 SEIDENFELD ELLA        421,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8100 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     421100 
50434414040008110 HIRSHFELD MENASHE & JUDY        280,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280400 
50434414040008120 RICKLES ESTELLE        280,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280400 
50434414040008140 WARTOW LINDA K        230,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280400 
50434414040008150 SPEIGEL GEORGE EST        70,997.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     280400 
50434414040008160 LERNER JOHN        243,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     293000 
50434414040008170 LEMBERGER SHIRLEY J        121,701.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     432650 
50434414040008180 SPIEGLER SARA        297,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     297200 
50434414040008190 COHEN PHILIP & CLARA COHEN CLARA       73,371.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     297200 
50434414040008200 MOLONEY DANIEL        238,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     238400 
50434414040008210 LEYDEN BERNARD        238,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     238400 
50434414040008220 MCCABE CHARLES F & LETAVISH JOAN C       167,993.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     305600 
50434414040008230 NABOKOV DMITRI BUTCHER C/O       305,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     305600 
50434414040008240 KLEIN BERNICE        316,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     316100 
50434414040008250 WOLOSOFF HONEY        139,368.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 8250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     597600 
50434414040009010 ELBIN HELLI EST        628,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9010 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     628550 
50434414040009020 WEINSTEIN NETTIE        342,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9020 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     342100 
50434414040009030 REVER PEARL REVER PEARL TR       223,912.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9030 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     331600 
50434414040009040 GILMAN MARTIN & DORIS        331,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9040 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     331600 
50434414040009050 LOBEL SANDRA        44,612.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9050 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     264400 
50434414040009060 SETTON JACK E & SETTON ALEXANDRA       264,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9060 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     264400 
50434414040009070 KRONOVET HELEN        73,942.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9070 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     317950 
50434414040009080 KAY JULES & KAY CONNIE       317,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9080 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     317950 
50434414040009090 ORENSTEIN SOPHIE        458,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9090 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     458650 
50434414040009100 ROSENBERG BERTHA EST        117,663.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     426100 
50434414040009110 SIMON EMILY        71,568.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9110 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     285400 
50434414040009120 KYLE MYRA        285,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9120 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     285400 
50434414040009140 KLOSNER NATALIE        356,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9140 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     411600 
50434414040009150 NEWMAN ELEANOR P        285,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9150 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     285400 
50434414040009160 MIGICOVSKY BURTON & MIGICOVSKY NAOMI       298,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9160 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     298000 
50434414040009170 HARRISON JANET R EST        437,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9170 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     437650 
50434414040009180 LANDON OLIVE        77,674.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9180 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     302200 
50434414040009190 CARROLL JAMES P & CARROLL DANIELE       302,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9190 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     302200 
50434414040009200 GARCIA CATHERINE & HOWE G ELLEN       193,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9200 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     243400 
50434414040009210 MOSS RONNIE        187,059.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1038     243400 
50434414040009220 MAISONNEUVE MGT CORP CANADA LT        310,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9220 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     310600 
50434414040009230 LEVIN STANLEY L        310,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9230 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     310600 
50434414040009240 DEROSSI ANNE        98,428.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9240 0510 CO-OP 1969   1559     321100 
50434414040009250 MASON MALCOLM        140,937.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043441404 TWENTY TWO NINETY FIVE CO-OP 9250 0510 CO-OP 1969   1959     607600 
50434415010000150 PETERSEN HORST H        539,850.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1985 02 02 00 1     175972       2370       2834       1842                 
50434415010000160 BERIRO RAPHAEL & BERIRO FORTUNE       589,575.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1985 02 02 00 1      18870       2643       2788       2304                 
50434415010000170 JACKSON WALTER        550,172.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1963 03 03 01 1      22137       3226       3518       2798                 
50434415010000180 JACKSON WALTER        1,602,615.00 0 VACANT                           
50434415010000190 JACKSON WALTER        1,601,600.00 0 VACANT                           
50434415010000200 GERING SHELDON R TR        1,628,539.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1960 1975 03 04 00 1      15838       3354       3774       2894                 
50434415010000210 MARGULIES HARRIETT B MARGULIES HARRIETT B TR       819,471.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1980 03 03 00 1     348463       3546       3882       3087                 
50434415010000220 MYERS RICHARD G RICHARD G MYERS TR TI HLDR       658,022.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1966 1966 03 03 00 1     123588       3208       3490       2780                 
50434415010000230 CASAS ANDRES G ANDRES CASAS TR TITL HLDR       1,563,290.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1970 1975 03 03 00 1      17400       3489       3795       3095                 
50434415010000240 SHERMAN IRVING J        1,621,297.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1981 1981 04 05 01 1     450785       6457       7307       5617                 
50434415010000250 RULE LAWRENCES JR & RULE LAURA L       313,983.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1965 03 03 00 2     211762       2958       3794       2235                 
50434415010000260 MESSING JOAN E        365,902.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1980 03 03 00 1     249498       3283       3466       2896                 
50434415010000270 WILLBORN HOLDINGS INC BAUR MILLER & WEBNER C/O       912,711.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 00 03 01 2     663249       4009       4969       3499                 
50434415010000280 WATKINS BRUCE W & WATKINS TAMARA       355,114.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1956 1975 02 02 00 1     172150       2293       2512       1948                 
50434415010000290 SWIFT LISA D        404,096.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1963 03 03 01 2     334695       3590       3834       3224                 
50434415010000300 LEVINE TERRY J LEVINE BETH       313,191.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1980 03 03 00 1     187630       2316       2683       1933                 
50434415010000310 MCDONALD JOHN L        631,389.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1999 1999 03 03 00 1     485047       3549       3838       3146                 
50434415010000320 WYNKOOP RAYMOND C RAYMOND C WYNKOOP TR TITL HLDRS       305,974.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1959 1975 03 03 00 1     202025       2691       3047       2259                 
50434415010000330 REMSON MARK REMSON MARK TR       227,500.00 0 VACANT                           
50434415010000340 PANER WALTER B & PANER ANITA H       252,311.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 03 03 00 1     190659       2694       3065       2133                 
50434415010000350 HOFFMAN TIMOTHY & PHYLLIS HOFFMAN TR HLDR       716,288.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1965 1965 04 03 00 1      29548       3575       4165       3354                 
50434415010000360 HUTZLER ALBERT D III & HUTZLER SANDRA G       735,125.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1965 04 04 00 2      62037       3989       4577       3408                 
50434415010000370 MASSOUMI MAS G        2,102,100.00 0 VACANT                           
50434415010000380 2299 IBIS ISLE ROAD LLC        2,107,469.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1961 02 02 00 1       5369       1959       2021       1933                 
50434415010000390 MAYER FRIEDEL FRIEDEL MAYER TR TITL HLDR       377,172.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1973 03 02 00 1       8387       2497       2868       2107                 
50434415010000400 RILL DOUGLAS J &        777,667.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1968 1975 03 03 00 1     244835       3292       3628       2897                 
50434415010000410 HUNT THOMAS P & HUNT LINDA K       450,626.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1972 1990 04 04 01 2     302631       5597       5636       5580                 
50434415010000420 COON MILES A &        1,274,203.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1990 03 04 00 1     215096       2862       3708       2185                 
50434415010000430 STEFFES INVESTMENTS INC        1,115,324.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1963 1963 03 03 00 1       7269       2247       2511       1807                 
50434415010000440 RUDOLPH HOWARD M & RUDOLPH JULIANNE       443,881.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1978 1999 03 03 00 1      11534       2877       3193       2439                 
50434415010000450 GOLDFEIN LAURENCE &        1,497,644.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1988 1998 04 03 01 2     387593       4087       4774       3532                 
50434415010000460 LA ROVERE FRANCIS J & LA ROVERE JOAN M &       1,115,406.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 1961 1961 03 03 00 1       8828       2802       3270       2356                 
50434415010000470 COFER SANDRA G COFER SANDRA G TR       1,487,330.00 0 SINGLE FAMILY 2005 2005 00 00 00 2     633838       5515       5699       5184                 
50434415010000481 MASSOUMI M G TR        1,851,850.00 0 VACANT                           
50434415010000550 STUDIO B DESIGN INC        770,770.00 0 VACANT                           
50434415010000560 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 1.1 MUNICIPAL                           
50434415190000010 MARINO CHRISTINA D        206,618.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441519 VILLA TAMBOUR CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1335     415800 
50434415190000020 KLAPPER HERBERT &        280,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441519 VILLA TAMBOUR CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968    825     279300 
50434415190000030 KOGON BEVERLIE        82,339.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441519 VILLA TAMBOUR CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1335     415800 
50434415190000040 MILLARD FRANK W & MILLARD SUZANNE T       420,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441519 VILLA TAMBOUR CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1335     420800 
50434415190000050 STERN ELLEN D        284,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441519 VILLA TAMBOUR CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968    825     284300 
50434415190000060 CONRAD MARK K & CONRAD KAREN B       344,734.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441519 VILLA TAMBOUR CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1335     420800 
50434415200000010 DALY ROSANNE E & ROSANNE & JOSEPH DALY ET AL TR HLDRS       157,798.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     417900 
50434415200000020 WYMAN THOMAS G TR        369,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968   1168     369600 
50434415200000030 SCHAFFER PETER L        389,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     389550 
50434415200000040 MORSE CONSTANCE E        117,697.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     389550 
50434415200000050 REINKE ALICE D        417,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     417900 
50434415200000060 CROWLEY ARTHUR M & CATHARINE        422,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     422900 
50434415200000070 ONEIL JOYCE C EST        374,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1968   1168     374600 
50434415200000080 MULVIHILL PATRICIA        394,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     394550 
50434415200000090 LODHI AMER & TAHIRA        395,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     394550 
50434415200000100 PANCZA PATRICE S        422,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     422900 
50434415200000110 COLE SARA M &        427,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     427900 
50434415200000120 KLEIN RAYMOND J & KORNBERG MICHAEL B       204,681.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1968   1168     379600 
50434415200000140 BARRY JAMES J SR & BARRY MARY O       399,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     399550 
50434415200000150 HOFFMAN VALERIE & HOFFMAN DAVID       399,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     399550 
50434415200000160 WOLTZ ALAN & VALRIE        427,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441520 CHATEAU CHAUMONT CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     427900 
50434415210000010 PRENDERGAST ROBERT & BARBARA        417,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     417900 
50434415210000020 BYTHEWOOD DANIEL &        369,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968   1168     369600 
50434415210000030 CUSHING RUTH D        389,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     389550 
50434415210000040 KYPRIOS EMANUEL & KYPRIOS SONIA V       160,370.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     417900 
50434415210000050 HURLEY MARYANN H        422,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     422900 
50434415210000060 ROSEN VIRGINIA B TR        374,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1168     374600 
50434415210000070 RUSK BRIAN D & RUSK MAUREEN MILLANE       394,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     394550 
50434415210000080 JONES CELESTE JONES CELESTE TR       351,259.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441521 VILLA SEREIN CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     422900 
50434415220000010 DELONG THOMAS A &        378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     378000 
50434415220000020 SALANDRA DIANA        299,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     349650 
50434415220000030 MORTIMER LINDA M        329,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1968   1168     329700 
50434415220000040 WEISSMAN EDNA TRUST WEISSMAN EDNA TR       378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     378000 
50434415220000050 MILNER EARLE R        383,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     383000 
50434415220000060 ABBOTT JAMES R JR        354,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1968   1269     354650 
50434415220000070 STEFFAN VINCENT C        336,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1968   1168     334700 
50434415220000080 HURLEY JOHN L COMMERCIAL PIPE & SUPPLY C/O       333,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441522 VILLA LAC BEAU CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1968   1473     383000 
50434415230000010 KNIBB GRACE B ROBERT KNIBB C/O       722,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969   2592     722400 
50434415230000020 BROWN DANIEL F &        389,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     389550 
50434415230000030 STAFFORD C RICHARD        371,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     369600 
50434415230000040 JENSEN DYNE        417,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     417900 
50434415230000050 STEVENS SUSAN S        677,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1969   2592     727400 
50434415230000060 MORRISON MIA        344,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     394550 
50434415230000070 GELB JOY L        374,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     374600 
50434415230000080 SLATER NELSON & BRENDA L        422,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     422900 
50434415230000090 A BECKER CORP MSI BARNES & ASSOCIATES C/O       732,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1969   2592     732400 
50434415230000100 KAMM DAVID G TR        399,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     399550 
50434415230000110 GUGELOT STEFANIE STEFANIE GUELOT TR TITL HLDR       329,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     379600 
50434415230000120 STARK BRIAN & BIBI        427,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441523 CHATEAU CHEVERNY CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     427900 
50434415240000010 EINHORN PATRICIA K        215,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     679350 
50434415240000020 RODECKER ARTHUR & SUSAN TRUST RODECKER ARTHUR D TRUSTEE       513,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969   1486     513450 
50434415240000030 CYPRUS EVANS        654,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     654150 
50434415240000040 TOWER VALLANDRY OF IBIS ISLE ASSN INC DICKER KRIVOK & STOLOFF PA C/O       160,565.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   1486     466200 
50434415240000050 ROGATNICK SHIRLEY H ROGATNICK SHIRLEY H TR       215,409.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     699350 
50434415240000060 WEISSMAN JACK L & MANTYLA JOYCE E       437,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     720350 
50434415240000070 HERZ CAROL S        624,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     674150 
50434415240000080 KAGAN GERALD M        495,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     495600 
50434415240000090 HEATH ALFRED R HEATH ALFRED R TR       215,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     719350 
50434415240000100 TESTEMENTARY TRUST WYMAN THOMAS G TRUSTEE       740,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     740350 
50434415240000110 MILLER MICHELE K        215,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     694150 
50434415240000120 277171 ONTARIO LTD HONEY STARK C/O       540,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     540750 
50434415240000140 LARSEN LYNNE D LARSEN LYNNE D TR       266,723.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     739350 
50434415240000150 KARIOTIS MICHAEL &        760,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     760350 
50434415240000160 KARIOTIS MICHAEL & JOAN        714,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     714150 
50434415240000170 BALE P ROBERT & GLORIA H BALE GLORIA H       190,486.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     550750 
50434415240000180 CUSHING RUTH D        427,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     759350 
50434415240000190 TESSLER ESTHER L BENEDICT TESSLER ET AL TRTI HL       780,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     780350 
50434415240000200 SAN FAN ANDRE MARGARET H        635,707.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     734150 
50434415240000210 MACDONALD WENDY &        560,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1969   1949     560750 
50434415240000220 DUNCAN PATRICIA        971,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1969   2692     971250 
50434415240000230 WEISSMAN EDNA WEISSMAN EDNA TR       359,978.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441524 TOWER VALLANDRY CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1969   2692     971250 
50434415250000010 BOLLENBACH OTHILIE S BOLLENBACH OTHILIE S TR       112,286.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     378000 
50434415250000020 HAYWARD JOSEPH C & CRONIN MAUREEN       279,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     329700 
50434415250000030 PURCELL ERIC P        299,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     349650 
50434415250000040 BUNNELL CHARLES & BUNNELL ELIZABETH       208,731.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     329700 
50434415250000050 BELL WILLIAM LEE        161,538.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     378000 
50434415250000060 MELLARS PETER & FAZLE DASTGIR       383,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     383000 
50434415250000070 MILLER DAVID & MILLER ANNETTE       336,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     334700 
50434415250000080 POLTENSON SALLY SALLY POLTENSON TR       93,172.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     354650 
50434415250000090 PARKER ELLIS J PARKER NANCY B       124,608.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     334700 
50434415250000100 PANZER MARTIN E        95,079.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     383000 
50434415250000110 BERKSHIRE BETSY S        120,494.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     388000 
50434415250000120 COOK BRYSON L & COOK CYNTHIA E       341,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     339700 
50434415250000140 CARPENTER APRIL        359,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     359650 
50434415250000150 LAMPE MARY M        339,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     339700 
50434415250000160 CHAMP GRACE M        388,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441525 CHATEAU RAMBOUILLET CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     388000 
50434415260000010 BAEZA JUAN CARLOS & JUAN CARLOS BAEZA ET AL TR HLDRS       290,364.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     378000 
50434415260000020 LEVINE JOSHUA & SELENE        349,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     349650 
50434415260000030 MAHER WILLIAM E        329,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     329700 
50434415260000040 COLEMAN SUSAN COLEMAN SUSAN TR       160,370.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     378000 
50434415260000050 FRIEDMAN JEFFREY A        383,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     383000 
50434415260000060 MACDONNELL JOANNE M        354,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     354650 
50434415260000070 BRENNAN SUZANNE M & BRENNAN JOHN J       284,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     334700 
50434415260000080 MANIN MITCHELL & BELLEVUE JOYCE       383,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     383000 
50434415260000090 TOUB PATRICIA        389,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     388000 
50434415260000100 COOPER THEODORE        360,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1969   1269     359650 
50434415260000110 SOLOMON JUDY ANN LAURIE SOLOMON C/O       81,963.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1969   1168     339700 
50434415260000120 BROYHILL ROY F & ARLINE W BROYHILL TRS       388,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441526 CHATEAU CHANTILLY CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     388000 
50434415270000010 HEIDT LESLIE TR        127,512.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441527 VILLA RIDEAU CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1969   2401     553350 
50434415270000020 NOBLE PAUL R & COOPER PAULETTE       189,233.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441527 VILLA RIDEAU CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     378000 
50434415270000030 LOENING ALBERT P &        334,627.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441527 VILLA RIDEAU CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1969   2401     558600 
50434415270000040 TRAUB GEORGE S & NINA M        383,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441527 VILLA RIDEAU CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1969   1473     383000 
50434415290000010 FISHMAN BETTY S FISHMAN BETTY S TR       495,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     495600 
50434415290000020 GSCHWANDTNER GERHARD ET AL        513,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1970   1486     513450 
50434415290000030 RODBELL RHODA        215,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     605850 
50434415290000040 HERMELEE ELIZABETH        466,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1970   1486     466200 
50434415290000050 KARETSOS MARIA        515,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     515600 
50434415290000060 MEILMAN JEFFREY &        654,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     654150 
50434415290000070 MARKS ROBERT L & MARKS SHEILA T       630,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     630850 
50434415290000080 GRIMALDI RONALD A EST KOSKINAS FRANCINE G C/O       549,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     549150 
50434415290000090 KROSNEY RITA K        540,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     540750 
50434415290000100 KERSTEIN LAWRENCE        679,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     679150 
50434415290000110 LITOWITZ NORMAN S TR & LITOWITZ BONNIE E TRUSTEE       655,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     655850 
50434415290000120 GREEN JOAN M        361,046.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     559150 
50434415290000140 SCHOENHOLTZ JACK C        550,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     550750 
50434415290000150 CHANG PRIMALIA        704,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     704150 
50434415290000160 KOSLOWSKY ROBERT & GREAT STATE BEVERAGES C/O       680,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     680850 
50434415290000170 PICKARD JEANETTE B        177,886.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     569150 
50434415290000180 SHARFMAN MIRIAM        560,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     560750 
50434415290000190 TOLLEY BARBARA L TR        224,413.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     729150 
50434415290000200 KAHN ADELE        467,613.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     705850 
50434415290000210 MCELROY ROBERT        529,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1970   1949     579150 
50434415290000220 KESSLER JOHN &        727,507.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1970   2692     971250 
50434415290000230 RIBICOFF BELLE K & JOSEPH A GITLIN TRS       971,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043441529 TOWER VALLANCAY CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1970   2692     971250 
50434423000020120 J V ASSOC        66,000,000.00 7.4 MOTEL           1990 1990 0038 01 3 FIRE PROOF   21238410     147385         
50434423000020120 J V ASSOC        66,000,000.00 7.4 MOTEL           1990 1990 0086 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6879810      51128         
50434423000020120 J V ASSOC        66,000,000.00 7.4 MOTEL           1990 1990 0086 01 3 FIRE PROOF    6928940      51128         
50434423000020120 J V ASSOC        66,000,000.00 7.4 MOTEL           1990 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF     213760       1209         
50434423000020160 2401 2301 00 TRUST CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR       31,105,586.00 2.6685 MOTEL           1980 1980 0000 01 2 FIRE RESIS      80310        880         
50434423000020160 2401 2301 00 TRUST CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA TR       31,105,586.00 2.6685 MOTEL           1980 1985 0134 01 3 FIRE PROOF    9518040     100504         
50434423000020190 2875 DEVELOPMENT GROUP        5,760,120.00 2.2 OFF MULTISTORY           1982 1995 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME    3393940      30417         
50434423000020200 PALM BEACH COUNTY PREM DIVISION C/O       0.00 1.98 CTY INC NONMUNI           1979 1979 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      32430        726         
50434423000020270 2880 DEVELOPMENT GROUP        1,860,000.00 0 VACANT COMM           1954 1970 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME     237630       3835         
50434423000020280 PALMLOR LC        5,110,107.00 1.66 MOTEL           1971 1985 0098 01 2 FIRE RESIS    2495250      43902         
50434423010002010 LEAVITT JONATHAN B & KATHERINE M LEAVITT       158,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1970    788     158550 
50434423010002020 VANDER MEER SHARON K        108,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1970    788     158550 
50434423010002030 BONNER LAWRENCE &        158,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1970    788     158550 
50434423010002040 COHEN JEROME B TR & COHEN NAOMI B TR       158,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1970    788     158550 
50434423010002050 HARPER MARY LEE        235,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     235200 
50434423010002060 SHACTER FRED & GLADYS SHACTER GLADYS       49,341.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     235200 
50434423010002070 HANKE JOHN V        103,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1970    531     103950 
50434423010002080 PHARES JOAN A        109,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1970    531     109200 
50434423010002100 CROWLEY DREW & CROWLEY JANE       240,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240450 
50434423010002110 BAXTER ELAINE        235,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     235200 
50434423010002120 BENSON CYNTHIA        113,526.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240450 
50434423010002140 WHITE LAURIE C        240,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240450 
50434423010002150 MORRISON L R JR & VALERIE J        235,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     235200 
50434423010002160 WHITE LAURIE C        211,620.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     266700 
50434423010002170 ROSE JOHN A & ROSE JILL H       266,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     266700 
50434423010003010 WAYLER IRVING & FIRST VERMONT BANK TRS       163,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1970    788     163550 
50434423010003020 HECHT ARTHUR J & HECHT NANCY M       163,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1970    788     163550 
50434423010003030 JANJIGIAN ROBERT        93,540.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1970    788     163550 
50434423010003040 MURPHY JOAN E        163,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1970    788     163550 
50434423010003050 TRETIAK MILTON W        50,509.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240200 
50434423010003060 BLOOMDIELD BETTE B        240,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240200 
50434423010003070 HARARI ELI        108,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1970    531     108950 
50434423010003080 HOGE SHARON K        114,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1970    531     114200 
50434423010003090 MCCLOSKEY WILLIAM I & MCCLOSKEY MARGERY R       240,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240200 
50434423010003100 MUNSON FRANK W        245,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245450 
50434423010003110 KRAMER SUSAN ALLAN M KRAMER C/O       240,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240200 
50434423010003120 GALIPEAU REYNOLD J & GALIPEAU GERALDINE M       86,958.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245450 
50434423010003140 MANNINO LAWRENCE J & MANNINO STEPHANIE S       245,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245450 
50434423010003150 HOULD PAUL A &        81,253.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     240200 
50434423010003160 MARRA ANTHONY G &        276,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     276700 
50434423010003170 HACKEL MAGDA TR        276,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     276700 
50434423010004010 CASTELLUCCI JUDITH F CASTELLUCCI JUDITH F TR       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1970    788     168550 
50434423010004020 ACRISH SOLOMON & ACRISH TERRI       168,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1970    788     168550 
50434423010004030 DELANEY LAUREL A        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1970    788     168550 
50434423010004040 MARINO JOSEPH L JR &        168,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1970    788     168550 
50434423010004050 ISMIR ZAHI A ISMIR MARILYN K       245,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245200 
50434423010004060 MARINO JOSEPH L JR &        245,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245200 
50434423010004070 CARCATERRA JOSEPH        113,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1970    531     113950 
50434423010004080 SOWARDS B D & KATHERINE M        119,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1970    531     119200 
50434423010004090 ABESSINIO PHILIP & CAROLE        245,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245200 
50434423010004100 HANLEY C E & JANE W        250,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250450 
50434423010004110 MESSERE LOUIS N & MESSERE ROSE       245,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245200 
50434423010004120 LIEF INGRID        250,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250450 
50434423010004140 MANDELL P H & PATRICIA M HIMEL        250,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250450 
50434423010004150 MANN LILLIAN E KAPLAN SUSAN L   C/O       51,679.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     245200 
50434423010004160 DOUX MADLEINE TRUST        84,403.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     286700 
50434423010004170 SAUNDERS RICHARD & MURIEL SAUNDERS MURIEL       79,403.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     286700 
50434423010005010 REIMAN MICHAEL S        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1970    788     173550 
50434423010005020 RINALDO DONNA        173,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1970    788     173550 
50434423010005030 OCHS HELMUT        173,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1970    788     173550 
50434423010005040 CHARNY STEPHANIE ARSENE VLADIMIR       173,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1970    788     173550 
50434423010005050 WAYLER IRVING & FIRST VERMONT BANK TRS       250,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250200 
50434423010005060 FORMAN ROY TR        250,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250200 
50434423010005070 NITCHMANN LOUIS P & CHRISTINE        118,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1970    531     118950 
50434423010005080 KRONICK HARRIANNE        124,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1970    531     124200 
50434423010005090 AMMONS HERBERT A & KIDD-AMMONS GLADYS       250,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250200 
50434423010005100 KRONICK HARRIANNE        255,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255450 
50434423010005110 GREENSTEIN IVAN H & GREENSTEIN SUSAN       250,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250200 
50434423010005120 BLOOM D DUDLEY & BLOOM NANCY       255,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255450 
50434423010005140 MILLER DENNIS        255,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255450 
50434423010005150 HANNA TIMOTHY K        250,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     250200 
50434423010005160 STARR SHERMAN H &        296,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     296700 
50434423010005170 SCHWARTZ ALAN        296,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     296700 
50434423010006010 JUDAR CHARLOTTE        24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1970    788     178550 
50434423010006020 KLEIN ROSS A        178,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1970    788     178550 
50434423010006030 HARDACRE RITA RITA HARDCARE TR TITL HLDR       128,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1970    788     178550 
50434423010006040 KRALJ OTTOKAR K        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1970    788     178550 
50434423010006050 FERGUS COLIN & HARDACRE-FERGUS JEAN M       255,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255200 
50434423010006060 LECK MAUREEN Q        255,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255200 
50434423010006070 HARRINGTON J F & MARGARET S        123,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1970    531     123950 
50434423010006080 WUNSCH CHARLES M TR        129,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1970    531     129200 
50434423010006090 MARINO CAROLE L        255,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255200 
50434423010006100 GARITO FRANK J        260,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     260450 
50434423010006110 GREY STANLEY B & RITA        255,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255200 
50434423010006120 ZETZER ROBERT S & ROBERT & LOIS ZETZER ET AL TR HLDRS       97,231.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     260450 
50434423010006140 RAINE ALEXANDRA TR & ROSALIND KAUFMAN PALM BEACH TRUST       260,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     260450 
50434423010006150 BAILEN BLANCHE TRUST BAILEN BLANCHE TRUSTEE       255,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     255200 
50434423010006160 RAINE ALEXANDRA        306,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     306700 
50434423010006170 ARONS BARBARA F EST        306,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     306700 
50434423010007010 KESMAN STEVEN E        183,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1970    788     183550 
50434423010007020 HEIMERL JOSEFINE        183,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1970    788     183550 
50434423010007030 SIBSON DEMRY W & SALAZAR BARBARA C       183,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1970    788     183550 
50434423010007040 BAILEN BURTON TRUST BAILEN BURTON TRUSTEE &       372,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1970   1905     372750 
50434423010007050 ROBBINS BARRY & ROBBINS AUDREY       260,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     260200 
50434423010007070 FIRST NATIONAL PALM BEACH TR KAUFMANN TRUST F10135       128,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1970    531     128950 
50434423010007080 SIBSON BRUCE W &        134,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1970    531     134200 
50434423010007090 KAUFMAN CARRY H FRIST NATIONAL BANK TR       53,305.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     260200 
50434423010007100 CHAUTIN LLOYD C & MICHELE        265,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     265450 
50434423010007110 EINEKER THOMAS P & EINEKER GAIL       260,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     260200 
50434423010007120 SAVER HARRY & ESTHER        265,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7120 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     265450 
50434423010007140 SELINGER MARIANNE R SELINGER MARIANNE R       53,305.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7140 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     265450 
50434423010007150 RAFIZADEH FARHAD &        260,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7150 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     260200 
50434423010007160 HANKE JOHN V        147,128.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7160 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     316700 
50434423010007170 FENDRICK ANITA L FENDRICK ANITA L TR       146,628.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442301 PRESIDENT OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7170 0400 CONDO 1970   1116     316700 
50434423020000010 STEINHARDT RAPHAEL DUNPHY JOAN S       0.00 0.8581 VACANT                           
50434423020002010 LIDDY SARAH J &        238,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1970    972     238350 
50434423020002020 SLAVIN W JAMES        182,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1970    675     182700 
50434423020002030 PYMS JACK S        182,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1970    675     182700 
50434423020002040 DAGOSTINO JOSEPH TRUST DAGOSTINO JOSEPH TR       151,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1970    638     151200 
50434423020002050 STEVENS JOHN & KATHERINE        161,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1970    675     161700 
50434423020002060 REICHENBERG JAMES J JR        235,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1970    918     235200 
50434423020002070 SLEMMER THOMAS M        238,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1970    972     238350 
50434423020002090 CHAI ASSOCIATES LTD        238,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1970    972     238350 
50434423020002100 MOORE GEORGE J & MOORE MARY M       70,704.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1970    675     182700 
50434423020002110 HAUSCHILD ERIC J ERIC & ELEANOR HAUSCHILD ET AL TR HLDRS       70,204.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1970    638     151200 
50434423020002120 LOVELL RON & LOVELL ILSE       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1970    675     182700 
50434423020002140 BARAD MICHAEL S        191,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1970    972     241500 
50434423020002150 LIGHTMAN ELIZABETH &        341,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1970    972     341250 
50434423020003010 BARBARITO JAMES A        243,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1970    972     243350 
50434423020003020 CUYAR OLGA R & CUYAR ROBERT A       187,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1970    675     187700 
50434423020003030 ARNDT SIGRID &        137,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1970    675     187700 
50434423020003040 DOUGLAS SANDRA B & DOUGLAS THOMAS E       156,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1970    638     156200 
50434423020003050 KELLY CAREY A        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1970    675     187700 
50434423020003060 COFFIN CONSTANCE A        35,985.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1970    918     240200 
50434423020003070 MARIANO THEODORE & MARIANO EILEEN       243,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1970    972     243350 
50434423020003080 DEYOUNG JEFFREY A        156,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1970    638     156200 
50434423020003090 WESTGARD BARBARA C BARBARA C WESTGARD TR HLDR       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1970    972     243350 
50434423020003100 BULLA MICHAEL & BULLA GERTI       187,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1970    675     187700 
50434423020003110 SCHERZER LISL & SCHERZER CHRISTINE E       156,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1970    638     156200 
50434423020003120 KOWALL MANFRED E & BARBEL KOWALL BARBEL       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1970    675     187700 
50434423020003140 REID AUDREY K        24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1970    972     246500 
50434423020003150 ZIGORIS MARK & ZIGORIS IRENE       351,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1970    972     351250 
50434423020004010 HOLSTEN HARRY H & GEORGE K HOLSTEN       248,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1970    972     248350 
50434423020004020 ARNDT HAGEN &        69,845.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1970    675     192700 
50434423020004030 MIXON STEMMLER BETSY A        192,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1970    675     192700 
50434423020004040 DUFFA ANTOINE        161,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1970    638     161200 
50434423020004050 KROBATH MICHAEL & KROBATH GUSTAV W       192,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1970    675     192700 
50434423020004060 SCURICH ELLEN SCURICH FAMILY LAND TRUST #2545       195,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1970    918     245200 
50434423020004070 MAMBRINO LAWRENCE J & MAMBRINO ROBERTA F       82,666.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1970    972     248350 
50434423020004080 NOVITSKI JOAN R        111,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1970    638     161200 
50434423020004090 GRUEN JOHN B & GRAYER LOUISE       248,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1970    972     248350 
50434423020004100 FUCHS HERLINDA        192,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1970    675     192700 
50434423020004110 FUCHS GERHART        161,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1970    638     161200 
50434423020004120 SCHERZER WALTER P        192,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1970    675     192700 
50434423020004140 SHIFF ROBERT H TR & SHIFF ELLEN M TR       251,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1970    972     251500 
50434423020004150 CHAI STANLEY G &        361,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442302 PALM BEACH WHITEHOUSE #1 CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1970    972     361250 
50434423030001030 ANDERER EDWARD J & ANDERER ELIZABETH O       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     151200 
50434423030001040 POUNCEY CHRISTIAN L &        151,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     151200 
50434423030001050 BENET R & VIVIAN BENET VIVIAN       51,514.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     215250 
50434423030001060 JOHNSON ROBERT & JOHNSON MARY ANN       288,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     288750 
50434423030001070 DEBE PETER        140,408.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     290850 
50434423030001080 LAINE CLIFFORD        51,514.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     215250 
50434423030001090 BEVIGNANI HARRY J        153,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     153300 
50434423030001100 WEST BETTE        46,512.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     153300 
50434423030001110 ROSELLI NICOLETTA        166,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1110 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     166950 
50434423030001120 SAMUELS HUGH &        253,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1120 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     253050 
50434423030001140 CIMBALLA GEORGE L III & BLANCO CHRISANA C       214,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 1140 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     264600 
50434423030002010 RUSK MAUREEN & RUSK BRIAN       266,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     266700 
50434423030002020 GAZONAS JOHN G        180,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     180600 
50434423030002030 MONGE MARIA E        170,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     170100 
50434423030002040 MORRIS JOHN B & JOHN & MARY MORRIS ET AL TR HLDRS       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     166950 
50434423030002050 DESCOTT MARGARITA L        230,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     230250 
50434423030002060 AKST PAULA B & AKST MARK B       298,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     298750 
50434423030002070 ODONNELL TERRENCE & ODONNELL MARGARET L       300,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     300850 
50434423030002080 MEAGHER ROBERT E & SHIRLEY & ROBERT MEAGHER ET AL TR HLDRS       94,948.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     230250 
50434423030002090 SCHWARTZ JANE G        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     169050 
50434423030002100 BARRIOS OTTO MAGDALA GONZALEZ C/O       182,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     182700 
50434423030002110 SCHACTER RUTH L        181,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     181950 
50434423030002120 MILLER ALEX J &        268,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     268050 
50434423030002140 KARP MARTIN A & DEBORAH        279,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     279600 
50434423030002150 SAUNDERS JOHN J & DONNA M        186,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     186900 
50434423030002160 DEMETROPOULOS ALEX & DEMETROPOULOS BARBARA &       66,416.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     186900 
50434423030002170 MONTOURIS GEORGE & MONTOURIS VASILIKI B       212,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     262500 
50434423030003010 EISMAN JOYCE E        118,296.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     277200 
50434423030003020 ROTHSTEIN BETSY        191,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     191100 
50434423030003030 ORDONEZ XIOMARA        47,721.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     180600 
50434423030003040 BELL DANIEL R & BELL RONNA R       45,834.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     177450 
50434423030003050 COVE JOHN P & TERMINI CARLA       188,145.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     241500 
50434423030003060 FABRIZIO FRANCIS        258,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     308750 
50434423030003070 FABRIZIO MARITAL TR        310,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     310850 
50434423030003080 LILLY FRANCIS X & LILLY KATHRYN M       241,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     241500 
50434423030003090 FRIEDLAND EDNA        24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     179550 
50434423030003100 MONASTER GEORGE &        193,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     193200 
50434423030003110 FLEMING THOMAS &        193,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     193200 
50434423030003120 KOSTAS JAMES T & MARIA V        279,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     279300 
50434423030003140 FASUL KATINA FASUL DENO S TR       77,686.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     290850 
50434423030003150 BRADLEY NOEL A & BRADLEY SUSAN P       197,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     197400 
50434423030003160 WOOD STUART E JR & WOOD BRENDA K       197,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     197400 
50434423030003170 SALOMON NEAL W & SALOMON KENNETH E &       72,983.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     288750 
50434423030004010 HORWICH HARRY & ROBERTA H HORWICH H/W       82,444.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     282200 
50434423030004020 BERNSTEIN ROSE BERNSTEIN SUSAN L       25,731.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     196100 
50434423030004030 HARDIMAN PATRICK & HARDIMAN MARY       185,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     185600 
50434423030004040 BERLE JOAN G &        24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     182450 
50434423030004050 BERGQUIST GUNNAR & KAY BERGQUIST KAY       53,346.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     246500 
50434423030004060 ROSE SHARON F        318,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     318750 
50434423030004070 LILLY FRANCIS X &        82,374.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     320850 
50434423030004080 TRUBASHNIK SIMON & TRUBASHNIK ANNA       246,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     246500 
50434423030004090 MCKENNA JOHN M & MCKENNA ELAINE C       184,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     184550 
50434423030004100 MORRIS LUCIE J        38,228.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     198200 
50434423030004110 PREDA GILDA        53,860.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     198200 
50434423030004120 LIAKOS DIANE        284,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     284300 
50434423030004140 SCHWARTZ HAROLD & ROCHELLE        295,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     295850 
50434423030004150 ARMIJO PATRICIA B ARMIJO PATRICIA B TR       48,944.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     202400 
50434423030004160 MCAULEY JOAN        152,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     202400 
50434423030004170 PRABA IRJA        79,925.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     293750 
50434423030005010 JONES SILVERMAN JOAN        237,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     287200 
50434423030005020 PALEOLOGO FRANCOISE        201,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     201100 
50434423030005030 WOJTUSIAK NORA        51,999.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     190600 
50434423030005040 WILSON BROCK B & WILSON JULIE R       187,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     187450 
50434423030005050 BARNES MARIA BARNES MARIA TR       56,368.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     251500 
50434423030005060 SHAMASH DAVOUD & SHAMASH MARCELLE       328,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     328750 
50434423030005070 RIZZO ADOLFO E        280,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     330850 
50434423030005080 LEVIN IRV & LEVIN ROSLYN       251,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     251500 
50434423030005090 MARCELLINO BERTHA L        139,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     189550 
50434423030005100 KATZ BERENICE B        43,442.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     203200 
50434423030005110 KUZMA ROBERT A        203,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     203200 
50434423030005120 COHN STUART S & CAROL L        289,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     289300 
50434423030005140 BEATO ALEIDA TRUST        300,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     300850 
50434423030005150 CECCHINI RICARDO E & NILDA E NILDA E CECCHINI       49,555.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     207400 
50434423030005160 KNIGHT ROBERT        207,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     207400 
50434423030005170 ANTONOU FRANCIS B        298,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     298750 
50434423030006010 FLEMING THOMAS FLEMING THOMAS TR       243,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     298200 
50434423030006020 GIOVINE PETER J        162,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     212100 
50434423030006030 RYAN EDWARD J &        201,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     201600 
50434423030006040 NYMAN IRVING IRVING NYMAN TR HLDR       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     198450 
50434423030006050 FELTMAN MAUREEN S MAUREEN S FELTMAN TR HLDR       62,304.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     262500 
50434423030006060 OPOTOW RUTH C/O CAROL A OPOTOW POA       89,461.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     351750 
50434423030006070 WEISS MONROE & WEISS MARILYN       353,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1971   1668     353850 
50434423030006080 RYAN EDWARD J & RYAN ANNE G       212,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1971   1400     262500 
50434423030006090 TODD JAMES W & TODD SHARON K       200,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1971   1012     200550 
50434423030006100 SCHELHAMMER LANCE E & LANCE E SCHELHAMMER TR TITL HLDR       164,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     214200 
50434423030006110 REED DENISE A        164,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1971   1180     214200 
50434423030006120 BATES NATALIE L        88,356.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     300300 
50434423030006140 BROWN ROBERT & TANSEY ELLEN       261,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     311850 
50434423030006150 OPPLIGER DONALD P & OPPLIGER DONNA N       168,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     218400 
50434423030006160 TRIGGS RICHARD D & WILLIAM S JENNINGS       218,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1971   1210     218400 
50434423030006170 GOODMAN ARLINE E        86,352.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442303 LA PALMA CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1971   1578     309750 
50434423040001010 MARELL PHYLLIS S TR        280,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     280350 
50434423040001020 FRIEDRICKS CLIFFORD & FRIEDRICKS VALERIE       284,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     284550 
50434423040001030 ALEXANDER MARVIN B ALEXANDER MARILYN S       151,611.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     263550 
50434423040001040 HERMAN BERNARD & HERMAN GLORIA       267,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     267750 
50434423040001050 STEIN PAUL & ROBERTA ROBERTA STEIN       75,729.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     259350 
50434423040001060 VICTOR ARTHUR & GRAIDA E        263,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     263550 
50434423040001070 ESMAN JULIUS H & ESMAN LILYAN       81,740.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     255150 
50434423040001080 SAFON JEAN B TR        209,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     259350 
50434423040001090 FRANK WILLIAM J & FRANK DONNA R       150,086.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     250950 
50434423040001100 SAPERA EDITH & SAPERA KASSILE L       255,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     255150 
50434423040001110 STEIN VIOLET STEIN VIOLET TR       66,057.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1110 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     246750 
50434423040001120 SUCHOFF ELEANOR        78,786.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1120 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     250950 
50434423040001140 WELSH ELLEN P        248,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1140 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     248850 
50434423040001150 GUTTMAN CHARLOTTE        244,650.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1150 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     244650 
50434423040001160 GREENBERG MELVIN        255,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1160 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     255150 
50434423040001170 VIZIRGIANAKIS GUDRUN &        109,046.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 1170 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     249900 
50434423040002010 BITTNER LISA T REV TRUST AGREEMENT BITTNER LISA T TRUSTEE       290,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     290350 
50434423040002020 ROSENTHAL HARRIET        104,582.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     294550 
50434423040002030 KARAKASHIAN GARY & KARAKASHIAN VINCENT       268,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     268550 
50434423040002040 LUDMAR LIZBETH L        222,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     272750 
50434423040002050 HANSON GARY W        76,218.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     264350 
50434423040002060 HOLTZMAN WILLIAM & HOLTZMAN EUDICE       268,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     268550 
50434423040002070 SALAZAR BARBARA C        260,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     260150 
50434423040002080 EBBOLE DEANA M TRUST        264,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     264350 
50434423040002090 HIRSCHMAN IRMA G        68,024.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     255950 
50434423040002100 KLION SANFORD J & MARILYN P KLION MARILYN P       80,253.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     260150 
50434423040002110 SASLOW MAX S TRUST EST        251,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     251750 
50434423040002120 LOBSENZ NATHANIEL & LOBSENZ SONDRA       255,950.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     255950 
50434423040002140 GOODMAN MARILYN ET AL        253,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     253850 
50434423040002150 VACCARO JOSEPH P & LAMB NANCY       199,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     249650 
50434423040002160 SCHROEDER LEANNE &        210,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     260150 
50434423040002170 SHERIDAN IRENA &        254,900.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     254900 
50434423040003010 RIVERA ARNOLD D & WITMER MICHEL       92,839.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     300350 
50434423040003020 KLEIN HERBERT D &        180,061.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     304550 
50434423040003030 HEALY PAULINE & OHALPIN STACIE       273,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     273550 
50434423040003040 YUNKER RALPH E &        90,038.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     277750 
50434423040003050 KLEIN MILTON D & BETSY        269,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     269350 
50434423040003060 HEIKKILA EUGENE C & ALICE M        273,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     273550 
50434423040003070 GRAEFE PETER U        265,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     265150 
50434423040003080 HORWITZ LEON J &        87,959.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     269350 
50434423040003090 WANG AMY C WANG AMY C TR       81,565.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     260950 
50434423040003100 ROTH FAY W TRUST EST JANE & SUSAN ROTH TRS       80,244.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     265150 
50434423040003110 GALIFI VITO & CONNIE        256,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     256750 
50434423040003120 COHEN ALAN S COHEN LYNDA G       260,950.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     260950 
50434423040003140 FLANDACA ALFRED V        258,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     258850 
50434423040003150 ROBERTS SPENCER W JR & ROBERTS CELESTE S       66,433.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     254650 
50434423040003160 BURCHMAN SHELDON L & HINDA Z LIVING TR BURCHMAN SHELDON L TRUSTEE       265,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     265150 
50434423040003170 STEINBERG STEPHEN & A STEINBERG C/O       259,900.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     259900 
50434423040004010 MASLOW STEVEN C IRA MASLOW STEVEN C TR       310,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     310350 
50434423040004020 GOLD MURRAY & ANNE        314,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     314550 
50434423040004030 KNOLLENBERG PETER TRUST KNOLLENBERG PETER TR       278,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     278550 
50434423040004040 BAKALAR JUNE JUNE BAKALAR TR TITL HLDR       232,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     282750 
50434423040004050 ROTH JOSEPH N & CONSTANCE ROTH CONSTANCE       72,196.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     274350 
50434423040004060 ALBERSTAT IRWIN & ALBERSTAT ROSELYN       228,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     278550 
50434423040004070 HIRSCH JOYCE P        76,218.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     270150 
50434423040004080 IMMERMAN IRVING S IMMERMAN HARRY F &       167,485.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     274350 
50434423040004090 ALTCHEK VICTOR S & ALTCHEK THIYA       265,950.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     265950 
50434423040004100 SILBER ALICE        270,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     270150 
50434423040004110 LATONA GAETANA        261,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     261750 
50434423040004120 GIUFFRE CARMELO        265,950.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     265950 
50434423040004140 LAZAR SHEILA JOSEPH N LAZAR DECLARATION OF TRUST       213,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     263850 
50434423040004150 CHEUNG MEI F        259,650.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     259650 
50434423040004160 MYERS MARTIN N &        270,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     270150 
50434423040004170 GARSHOFSKY TRUDY &        264,900.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     264900 
50434423040005010 MARCUS GLADYS & MARCUS HOWARD       106,108.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     320350 
50434423040005020 HUNTER LINDA B        258,828.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     324550 
50434423040005030 KALASSAY KARL W & KARL W KALASSAY TR HLDR       92,584.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     283550 
50434423040005040 LAMONICA R SAMUEL & JOSEPHINE        287,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     287750 
50434423040005050 BRANDMAN ELEANOR T        77,187.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     279350 
50434423040005060 ROSEN SEYMOUR J        283,550.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     283550 
50434423040005070 VIHKO OUTI K        275,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     275150 
50434423040005080 LASHINS PHYLLIS K        279,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     279350 
50434423040005090 VETROMILE MARIA G        270,950.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     270950 
50434423040005100 RAWAS ESTHER        275,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     275150 
50434423040005110 LEVINE TERRY &        266,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     266750 
50434423040005120 CALIFANO FRANK & CALIFANO NANCY       270,950.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     270950 
50434423040005140 SHAPIRO CLIFFORD        268,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     268850 
50434423040005150 MARKS STEVEN L &        106,196.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     264650 
50434423040005160 LYNN BRENDA L        275,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     275150 
50434423040005170 MYERS H K & EDYE D BESNER        269,900.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1973   1389     269900 
50434423040006010 ROSNER MARGUERITE        420,400.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1973   2710     470400 
50434423040006020 MERICANTANTE JOHN        234,190.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1973   2271     353850 
50434423040006030 DENDO SHIRLEY        148,835.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1973   2271     353850 
50434423040006040 WILNER JANE B        425,250.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1973   2710     425250 
50434423040006050 BLAZAR SYLVIA S BLAZAR SYLVIA S TR       343,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1973   2271     343350 
50434423040006060 GIUFFRE MANAGEMENT  CONSULTING LLC        343,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442304 CARLYLE HOUSE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1973   2271     343350 
50434423050010010 DALLE PHILIPPE        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010020 GOLDEN MELVIN & JUDITH        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010030 MEIER THOMAS J & MEIER SUSAN       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010040 PURCELL ROBERT D & EDYTH D        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010050 KARLIN MARTIN R TR KARLIN ESTELLE TR       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010060 VORON HARVEY & WENDY        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010070 FLORIDA PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST & BARON S LONNER TR       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010080 BROWN GERTRUDE M TR        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010090 FORREST GRACE W        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010100 BLANK S & RUTH JEFFREY BLANK & ASSOC C/O       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010110 WEISS ERIC S        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010120 SIMONE KEN & SIMONE MARIE       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010130 COVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010140 ROSENTHAL H I & SHIRLEY C        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010150 ZIMET BARBARA        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010160 KANTROWITZ ED & DEBBIE        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050010170 FEIST JILL L        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050011010 BLANK RUTH S RUTH S BLANK TR HLDR       512,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     512400 
50434423050011020 GOLDBERG EDNA A        121,302.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     426300 
50434423050011030 ROLLINS DAVID P        407,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     407400 
50434423050011040 PAPERMAN NINA TRUST NINA PAPERMAN TR       442,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1975   1847     442050 
50434423050011060 EDELMAN RUTH        93,307.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     416850 
50434423050011070 SIMONE KENNETH E & SIMONE MARIE R       424,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     424200 
50434423050011080 MEIER THOMAS J & MEIER SUSAN R       512,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     512400 
50434423050012010 DIAMOND LENORE S DIAMOND LENORE S TR       222,311.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     522400 
50434423050012020 KIRSCHENBAUM ELISE I        431,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     431300 
50434423050012030 FAUER RUTH P        121,802.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     412400 
50434423050012040 JACOBS GLORIA        206,132.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     380100 
50434423050012050 GOLD SIMON & GOLD LILLIAN       378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     378000 
50434423050012060 MCDONNELL DANIEL J & DANIEL J MCDONNELL ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       96,089.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     421850 
50434423050012070 SCHEFRIN ZIPPORAH        378,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     429200 
50434423050012080 BROWN ROBERT H & BROWN IRENE G       219,973.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     522400 
50434423050013010 MULCAHY SANDRA M MULCAHY SANDRA M TR       332,773.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     532400 
50434423050013020 CUMMINGS JACQUELINE        385,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     436300 
50434423050013030 GOLIEB NANCY A MUCHNICK GOLIEB & GOLIEB PC C/O       417,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     417400 
50434423050013040 GARNET WILLIAM & GARNET PERLE       273,085.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     385100 
50434423050013050 LEVENSON MAXIMILIAN        383,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     383000 
50434423050013060 FROST ROBERTA        97,872.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     426850 
50434423050013070 LUCKEL LUCIEN J        434,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     434200 
50434423050013080 DOBKIN BEATRICE & BEATRICE BASKIN TR TITL HLDR       354,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     532400 
50434423050014010 KIRBY PATRICK G & EVELYN J        542,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     542400 
50434423050014020 WEISS ERIC S        441,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     441300 
50434423050014030 FEIST JILL L        162,808.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     422400 
50434423050014040 ORLOV DARLENE        390,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     390100 
50434423050014050 BERNSTEIN ELLEN J        388,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     388000 
50434423050014060 RIFKIN MATTHEW D &        431,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     431850 
50434423050014070 SILVERS PEARL F        120,699.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     439200 
50434423050014080 MORFOGEN ZACHARY & MORFOGEN MARILYN       359,959.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     542400 
50434423050015010 MALDOFF GERRY & SUSAN TRUST MALDOFF GERRY TRUSTEE &       225,318.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     564900 
50434423050015020 AVIV EVA        126,477.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     452550 
50434423050015030 VENEZIA G NICHOLAS & DOROTHY D        433,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     433650 
50434423050015040 RUBINSTEIN CHARLES & RUBINSTEIN PHYLLIS       401,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     401100 
50434423050015050 GORDON DOROTHY M        98,372.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1975   1541     399000 
50434423050015060 KANTROWITZ DEBORAH B & DEBORAH & S E KANTROWITZ ET AL TR HLDRS       101,933.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     443100 
50434423050015070 GRIMES EDWARD & ZELOP CAROLYN       450,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     450450 
50434423050015080 DESGROSEILLERS DENNIS & CZEREPAK PAMELA       564,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1975   2006     564900 
50434423050020010 RIFKIN MATTHEW D & RIFKIN SUSAN G       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050020020 MORFOGEN ZACHARY & MORFOGEN MARILYN       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050020030 SCALETTAR HOWARD E TR & SCALETTAR GLORIA TR       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050020040 FRANK GERALD A        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050020050 ECHIKSON ALAN        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050020060 MANGEL MICHAEL C        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050020070 KIRSCHENBAUM ELSIE I        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050021010 LONNER BRIGITTE JESS H LONNER ET AL TR HLDRS       218,805.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1975   2096     520800 
50434423050021020 IVANCEVIC DANILO &        324,073.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1975   2039     515550 
50434423050021030 ECHIKSON ALAN        407,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     407400 
50434423050021040 SINYOR ELAINE        407,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     407400 
50434423050021050 GUTILLA ANTHONY        120,058.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1975   1847     442050 
50434423050022010 SHEIN RONA        530,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1975   2096     530800 
50434423050022020 SCHWARTZ HELENE R TRUST        628,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1975   2507     628950 
50434423050022030 MANGEL MICHAEL C        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1975   1120     278250 
50434423050022040 ABRAMS CONSTANCE TR        412,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     412400 
50434423050022050 WISE BARBARA        447,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1975   1847     447050 
50434423050023010 FORREST GRACE W        220,642.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1975   2096     540800 
50434423050023020 DJAMOOS THERESA L        513,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1975   2239     563850 
50434423050023030 MELCHIORRE ROBERT G & MELCHIORRE MARTHA J       348,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1975   1480     348600 
50434423050023040 BLUM MELVIN & BLUM CLAIRE       417,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     417400 
50434423050023050 CARPENDALE HOWARD        452,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1975   1847     452050 
50434423050024010 FRANK GERALD & FRANK JUNE       222,311.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1975   2096     550800 
50434423050024020 MARCUS FRANCES        224,148.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1975   2039     545550 
50434423050024030 ROGOFF BARBARA BARBARA ROGOFF TR TITL HLDR       123,639.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     422400 
50434423050024040 NICOLAIDES MARK        124,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     422400 
50434423050024050 LICHATIN STEPHEN &        457,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1975   1847     457050 
50434423050025010 KARLIN MARTIN R & MARTIN & ESTELLE KARLIN ET AL TR HLDRS       338,210.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1975   2096     573300 
50434423050025020 BARDELIS GRACE E BARDELIS GRACE E TR       351,259.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1975   2039     568050 
50434423050025030 VORON HARVEY & WENDY        433,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     433650 
50434423050025040 KEHLMANN ROBERT KEHLMANN DIANA T       433,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     433650 
50434423050025050 SCALETTAR HOWARD E SCALETTAR HOWARD E TR       128,813.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1975   1847     468300 
50434423050030010 DOBKIN BEATRICE TRUSTEE        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030020 EPSTEIN SAMUEL TR CHEMICAL BANK OF FLORIDA C/O       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030030 CAPPAS ELIZABETH TRUST        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030040 SHEIN RONA        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030050 ROGOFF BARBARA TR        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030060 BROWN ROBERT H BROWN IRENE G       10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030070 FLEDER ALAN TR        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030080 KIRBY PATRICK        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030090 WISE BARBARA        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030100 OMALLEY JAMES J SR        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050030110 STERN JOHN &        10,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1975      0      10500 
50434423050031010 COLE SYLVIA A COLE RICHARD A TR       479,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     479850 
50434423050031020 LEE DORIS S        121,302.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     426300 
50434423050031030 CASEY TIMOTHY J        469,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     469350 
50434423050032010 GREEN RUTH A        274,052.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     484850 
50434423050032020 SWEIGMAN MURRAY & FLORENCE        431,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     431300 
50434423050032030 STERN JOHN M CATLETT L REED       235,612.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     474350 
50434423050033010 FLEDER ALAN TR        489,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     489850 
50434423050033020 DE BEAR DIANE        124,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     436300 
50434423050033030 ZIMET BARBARA        429,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     479350 
50434423050034010 CAPPAS ELIZABETH TRUST        494,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     494850 
50434423050034020 SOLOMON RICHARD EST        125,307.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     441300 
50434423050034030 VON ZELOWITZ IRVING H & VON ZELOWITZ BIRGITTA L       484,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     484350 
50434423050035010 CALVIN KATHERINE G        506,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     506100 
50434423050035020 GOLDEN MELVIN & GOLDEN JUDITH       252,304.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1975   1661     452550 
50434423050035030 EPSTEIN SAMUEL TR EST        495,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442305 COVE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1975   2143     495600 
50434423060010010 LUBY CHESTER J & LUBY JOAN S       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1977      0      23100 
50434423060010020 BARON IRVING        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060010030 ZUCKERWAR JANE        21,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1977      0      21000 
50434423060010040 MCCUTCHEON NATHAN W        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060010050 SCHAFTEL MYRA & SCHAFTEL ARNOLD       15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060010060 CIABURRI JOSEPH & CIABURRI MARY       15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060010070 BRUCK ARELENE        21,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1977      0      21000 
50434423060010080 WALKER RICHARD H        21,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1977      0      21000 
50434423060010090 WILPON FRED & JUDITH A        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060010100 HIRSCHHORN RUTH TR        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1977      0      23100 
50434423060011010 MALDOFF BETTY        716,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     716100 
50434423060011020 FITILIS THEODORE N FITILIS THEODORE N TR       318,148.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     716100 
50434423060011030 MCCUTCHEON NATHAN W        401,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     401100 
50434423060011040 BLOCK MARJORIE J        198,938.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     390600 
50434423060011050 GURREN JEFFREY & GURREN LES       401,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     401100 
50434423060012010 WILPON FRED        821,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     821100 
50434423060012020 BRUCK ARLENE        821,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     821100 
50434423060012030 WILPON FRED & JUDITH A        453,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     453600 
50434423060012040 PHILLIPS ELEANOR PHILLIPS ELEANOR TR       200,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     443100 
50434423060012050 SIMON EDWARD D &        196,598.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     453600 
50434423060013010 GOLDBERG WILLIAM I        320,484.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     836100 
50434423060013020 LUBY CHESTER J & LUBY JOAN S       836,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     836100 
50434423060013030 RATNER JACK M        463,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     463600 
50434423060013040 GREENFIELD HARRIET        453,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     453100 
50434423060013050 OFFIT SIMON B        197,768.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     463600 
50434423060014010 SCHULTZ ALLEN M SCHULTZ ALLEN M TR       665,709.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     851100 
50434423060014020 ZUCKERWAR JANE TRUST        321,653.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     851100 
50434423060014030 GOFF MARCIA GREENWALD BARBARA G C/O       201,944.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     473600 
50434423060014040 KOWNACKI DAVID P & KOWNACKI TOBY M       463,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     463100 
50434423060014050 CIABURRI JOSEPH &        423,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     473600 
50434423060015010 MORELL CHEIKO MORELL CHEIKO TR       322,320.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     866100 
50434423060015020 WALKER RICHARD H        866,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     866100 
50434423060015030 ROSE RICHARD & JOYCE ROSE JOYCE       203,613.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     483600 
50434423060015040 SCHAFTEL MYRA & SCHAFTEL ARNOLD       203,613.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     473100 
50434423060015050 HIRSCHHORN RUTH & HIRSCHHORN JACK       200,106.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     483600 
50434423060020010 ARESTY CATHERINE        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1977      0      23100 
50434423060020020 PERCEC FAMILY TRUST PERCEC VIRGIL TR       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060020030 PALADINO DAVID C II & PALADINO VICTORIA       15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060020040 PALADINO DAVID C II        21,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1977      0      21000 
50434423060020050 MARTIN EDWARD J        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060020060 FARMER CATHERINE P        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060020070 WALTERS STEPHEN D & WALTERS FARAH M       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060020080 WEINSTEIN MELVIN & JANE        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060020090 ISOLINI RICHARD & ISOLINI ELIZABETH R       15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060020100 SCHWARTZ MILTON        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060021010 HOLTZMAN SAMUEL J        317,648.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     716100 
50434423060021020 SHERZER HARVEY G & SHERZER SUSAN B       396,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     396900 
50434423060021030 FENSTER HARVEY S & MARLENE B        391,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     391650 
50434423060021040 ENNIS SHARRON P        464,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1977   1795     464100 
50434423060021050 HEISCH ACHIM        292,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO  0400 CONDO 1988   1195     292950 
50434423060021060 KAMBER THEKLA EST GUTTER CHAVES JOSEPHER ET AL C/O       391,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     391650 
50434423060021070 HOLLINGER LISA        396,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     396900 
50434423060021080 GOLDMAN ROGER A &        716,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     716100 
50434423060022010 LEVY LAURA R        634,796.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     821100 
50434423060022020 SHMERLER EDWIN TRUST & SHMERLER PAULA TRUST       449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     449400 
50434423060022030 LUPOVICH JACK & JOAN        444,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     444150 
50434423060022040 REISMAN BERNARD E & SANDRA REISMAN SANDRA       166,212.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     443100 
50434423060022050 SPITZER CAROLE & CAROLE & ADRIAN SPITZER ET AL TR HLDRS       311,024.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1977   1540     418950 
50434423060022060 HOLLINGER LOIS G        444,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     444150 
50434423060022070 KRATKA SUZANNE        449,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     449400 
50434423060022080 HURVITZ FAMILY TRUST1996        821,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     821100 
50434423060023010 ARESTY CATHERINE        836,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     836100 
50434423060023020 NELSON DOROTHY M NELSON DOROTHY M TR       197,268.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     459400 
50434423060023030 ESSENFELD BERNICE        454,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     454150 
50434423060023040 BLANKS DOUGLAS H        378,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1540     428950 
50434423060023050 YAFFE ALAN M TRUST YAFFE ALAN M TRUSTEE       453,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     453100 
50434423060023060 KROWICKI JACOB W & KROWICKI BLANCE L       454,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     454150 
50434423060023070 GLASGALL ELAINE L        197,768.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     459400 
50434423060023080 PERCEC FAMILY TRUST PERCEC VIRGIL TR       836,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     836100 
50434423060024010 SCHWARTZ MILTON        851,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     851100 
50434423060024020 MILLER MICHAEL        469,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     469400 
50434423060024030 BROWNSTEIN HAROLD & NATALIE        464,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     464150 
50434423060024040 SCHARFER THELMA        168,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     463100 
50434423060024050 CASAVANT BERNARD        463,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     463100 
50434423060024060 KERMIT KITMAN ENTERPRISES INC        464,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     464150 
50434423060024070 FEINGOLD NORMA TR        469,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     469400 
50434423060024080 MARTIN EDWARD J        851,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     851100 
50434423060025010 PALADINO DAVID C II & PALADINO VICTORIA       866,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     866100 
50434423060025020 PARLOW JACK J & REVA KRONGOLD-PARLOW H/W       479,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     479400 
50434423060025030 ISOLINI RICHARD &        424,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     474150 
50434423060025040 GLICK NORMAN R        169,720.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     473100 
50434423060025050 TAFFET NATHAN        473,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1977   1670     473100 
50434423060025060 KLOPPEL BRIGITTE        474,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     474150 
50434423060025070 LYONS JUDITH N & LYONS KENNETH J       380,619.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     479400 
50434423060025080 PALADINO DAVID C II & PALADINO VICTORIA       866,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1977   1976     866100 
50434423060030010 KOWNACKI DAVID P & KOWNACKI TOBY M       15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060030020 RUSSO JOSEPH P        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060030030 GOFF MARCIA        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060030040 PHILLIPS ELEANOR TR        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060030050 HOLLINGER LOIS G        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060030060 KELLMAN BARBARA        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060030070 HOLLINGER LISA        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060030080 SIMON EDWARD D & SIMON SYLVIA B       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1977      0      14700 
50434423060030090 ROSE RICHARD & JOYCE        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060030100 LEVY LAURA R        21,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1977      0      21000 
50434423060030110 SKYER ROSLYN        15,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1977      0      15750 
50434423060031010 ROTH MALCOLM S TRUST        705,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     705600 
50434423060031020 KAYNE MILDRED & KAYNE ROBERT S       401,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     401100 
50434423060031030 WIESENFELD BESS        705,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     705600 
50434423060032010 WALTERS STEPHEN D & WALTERS FARAH M       810,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     810600 
50434423060032020 FRIGERIO ANGELO & FRIGERIO ANNA       453,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     453600 
50434423060032030 LUTON INVESTMENTS LTD        810,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     810600 
50434423060033010 SKYER ROSLYN        324,658.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     825600 
50434423060033020 LEVENTHAL HELEN        200,774.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     463600 
50434423060033030 2980703 CANADA INC ANDRE LANDSMAN C/O       825,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     825600 
50434423060034010 BARON IRVING        327,495.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     840600 
50434423060034020 VALENTINE MAURO & VALENTINE DORIS       473,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     473600 
50434423060034030 KELLMAN BARBARA        329,833.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     840600 
50434423060035010 WEINSTEIN JANE B        329,833.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     855600 
50434423060035020 RUSSO JOSEPH P        483,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1495     483600 
50434423060035030 FARMER CATHERINE P        855,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442306 TWENTY SIX HUNDRED CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   2143     855600 
50434423070010011 KASSELMAN PAUL &        719,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     719250 
50434423070010012 PEARLSTEIN FLORA & LEVINE AUDREY       344,541.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     824250 
50434423070010013 YANOFSKY MARCIA TRUST        829,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     829250 
50434423070010014 LEVY LAURENCE R & LEVY STEPHANIE       834,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     834250 
50434423070010015 SCHOUELA MAURICE D        839,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     839250 
50434423070010021 HOLLIN HARRIS N &        698,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     753900 
50434423070010022 CASPER ARTHUR B        858,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     858900 
50434423070010023 STUTTMAN SOL        364,368.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     863900 
50434423070010024 GOTTLIEB NEWTON &        562,665.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     868900 
50434423070010025 MAKLAN SHEILA HLDG INC        873,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     873900 
50434423070010031 ZISES HELEN A C/O  DAVID H ZISES       466,978.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1978   2978     864150 
50434423070010032 HORWITZ ALAN N & HORWITZ SUSAN P       766,654.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1983   2978     969150 
50434423070010033 PEARLMAN BARBARA K TRUST BARBARA K PEARLMAN TR       974,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1977   2978     974150 
50434423070010034 DENHOLTZ EDWARD & DENHOLTZ ELISE       929,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1978   2978     979150 
50434423070010035 STAYMAN JOSEPHINE L        443,756.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1978   2978     984150 
50434423070010041 SEGRAVES PATRICK W        669,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     719250 
50434423070010042 GOLBORO ALAN & GOLBORO BETTY-JANE       622,028.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     824250 
50434423070010043 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED MARIA CANNARIATO C/O       829,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     829250 
50434423070010044 VINEBERG PHILIP F        834,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     834250 
50434423070010045 MECKLER PETER A & MECKLER DIANE       839,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     839250 
50434423070020011 MILETI BERNADENE R        488,742.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     757050 
50434423070020012 BIONDO MICHELE & SALLY        862,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     862050 
50434423070020013 LEVINE HARVEY & GLORIA        867,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     867050 
50434423070020014 SPITALNY WILLIAM H & WILLIAM H & MIRIAM F SPITALNY TR HLDR       441,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     872050 
50434423070020015 FONDACO PROP INC        877,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     877050 
50434423070020021 FAIRSTEAD INTERNATIONAL LIMITED LEVINE MILDRED       978,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1978   2978     978600 
50434423070020022 BROWN ALVIN I & PEGGY S BROWN PEGGY S       479,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1978   2978    1083600 
50434423070020023 STERN AARON &        1,103,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1978   2978    1103600 
50434423070020024 SOBEL TERRY & ROBERT SOBEL & LESLIE GOLDBERG TRS       1,123,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1978   2978    1123600 
50434423070020025 H & A LTD WILLIAM EPSTEIN CA C/O       1,143,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1978   2978    1143600 
50434423070020031 FLUG ALFRED FLUG ALFRED TR       472,970.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     943950 
50434423070020032 COLEMAN LEONARD S JR &        998,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1983   2590    1048950 
50434423070020033 BLOOM WALTER LIVING TRUST & BLOOM CAROL LIVING TRUST       1,068,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1977   2590    1068950 
50434423070020034 LUTZ KARYN B TR        1,088,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1977   2590    1088950 
50434423070020035 ZELLER GABRIELLE & ZELLER PROPERTIES LLC C/O       1,108,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1978   2590    1108950 
50434423070020041 HOLTZ VIOLA & HOLTZ FAMILY QPRT # 2       710,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     761250 
50434423070020042 LORD ELEANOR LOUISE COLLINS & LORD JEROME E       866,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     866250 
50434423070020043 GROSS PRISCILLA        451,202.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     876250 
50434423070020044 ELLEN RONNA S        886,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     886250 
50434423070020045 FASSLER LEON & FASSLER ESTELLE       846,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     896250 
50434423070030011 NICHOLSON MARY A TRUST NICHOLSON MARY A TRUSTEE       757,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     757050 
50434423070030012 WARAN HOLDINGS INC ARTHUR J WECHSLER C/O       862,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     862050 
50434423070030013 ROSELL MARILYN MARILYN ROSELL TR       438,472.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     867050 
50434423070030014 LEVINE MELVIN J & CLAIRE M LEVINE CLAIRE M       441,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     872050 
50434423070030015 PERLE E GABRIEL PERLE PATRICIA A       443,130.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     877050 
50434423070030021 FRIEDMAN ROBERT I FRIEDMAN BETTY       447,042.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     854700 
50434423070030022 2500 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        959,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     959700 
50434423070030023 CHIAPPETTA REBECCA & CHIAPPETTA JOSEPH F       929,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     979700 
50434423070030024 EIGHT SIX FIVE FIVE FIVE G SMITH C/O       999,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     999700 
50434423070030025 CHATTIN ALBERT & CHATTIN PAULA       455,361.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1978   2590    1019700 
50434423070030031 BECKWITH LEO M EST DANIEL D LEVENSON TRUSTEE,  C/O       943,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     943950 
50434423070030032 ABRAMSON ANDREW B & ABRAMSON LISA       1,048,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1977   2590    1048950 
50434423070030033 KATZ STEVEN & KATZ RUTH       1,068,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1977   2590    1068950 
50434423070030034 LEVIN VIVIAN        1,025,461.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1977   2590    1088950 
50434423070030035 SALZMAN PHIL & AIDA        1,108,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1978   2590    1108950 
50434423070030041 MEADOWS AMY TR & VIRGINIA WEISS TRUST EST       761,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     761250 
50434423070030042 GELINAS AJ ALEX & SOSNOWITZ LINDA J       866,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     866250 
50434423070030043 MB SIBLINGS INC        876,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1978   2590     876250 
50434423070030044 KAPLAN LEONARD D & GLENYCE S KAPLAN GLENYCE S       886,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1977   2590     886250 
50434423070030045 YULMAN HELEN MORTON YULMAN RESIDUARY TRUST       454,861.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1983   2590     896250 
50434423070040010 SEGRAVES PATRICK W        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040020 CHIAPPETTA JOSEPH F & CHIAPPETTA REBECCA       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1983    174      36750 
50434423070040030 HOLLIN HARRIS N & HOLLIN SANDRA C       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1983    174      36750 
50434423070040040 KASSELMAN PAUL & KASSELMAN BECKY       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040050 ZELLER GABRIELLE & ZELLER PROPERTIES LLC C/O       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040060 ZISES HELEN A        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040070 FONDACO PROP INC        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040080 SALZMAN PHIL & AIDA        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040090 ELLEN RONNA S        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040100 GROSS ARTHUR & PRISCILLA TRS        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040110 FASSLER LEON & FASSLER ESTELLE       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040120 LEVY LAURENCE R & LEVY STEPHANIE       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040130 FAIRSTEAD INTERNATIONAL LIMITED        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040140 GELINAS AJ ALEX & SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP C/O       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040150 LUTZ KARYN B TR        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040160 STERN AARON &        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040170 STAYMAN JOSEPHINE L        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040180 BROWN ALVIN I & PEGGY S        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040190 ABRAMSON ANDREW B ABRAMSON LISA B       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040200 SPITALNY WILLIAM H & SPITALNY MIRIAM F       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1983    174      36750 
50434423070040210 LORD ELEANOR LOUISE COLLINS & LORD JEROME E       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040220 BLOOM WALTER LIVING TRUST & BLOOM CAROL LIVING TRUST       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040230 COLEMAN LEONARD S JR & COLEMAN LAURINDA S       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040240 PEARLMAN BARBARA K TRUST BARBARA K PEARLMAN TR       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0240 0400 CONDO 1983    174      36750 
50434423070040250 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0250 0400 CONDO 1983    174      36750 
50434423070040260 LEVIN MARTIN & VIVIAN        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0260 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040270 MECKLER PETER A & MECKLER DIANNE       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0270 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040280 HORWITZ ALAN N & HORWITZ SUSAN P       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0280 0400 CONDO 1983    174      36750 
50434423070040290 WEISS VIRGINIA WEISS VIRGINIA TRUST       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0290 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040300 BECKWITH LEO M EST NICHOLAS H HAGOORT JR C/O       36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0300 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423070040310 KAPLAN LEONARD & GLENYCE        36,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442307 TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED CONDO 0310 0400 CONDO 1978    174      36750 
50434423080010010 SPATZ DAVID        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1979      0      25200 
50434423080010020 LAICH WALTER & KARIN        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1979      0      23100 
50434423080010030 SILVERMAN ESTELLE TRUSTEE &        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1979      0      23100 
50434423080010040 FRYER GLORIA        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080010050 NORMAN Y STEIN REV TR 1995        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1979      0      23100 
50434423080010060 LUTZ JOEL & BARBARA        12,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1979      0      12600 
50434423080010070 ROBINSON HERMAN & JEANNE        30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1979      0      30450 
50434423080010080 WEISS RONALD &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1979      0      27300 
50434423080011010 BURGER DIANA        342,416.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     856800 
50434423080011020 DUBERSTEIN KENNETH & FAIN JACQUELYN       448,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     448350 
50434423080011030 SILVERMAN ESTELLE SILVERMAN ESTELLE TR       407,339.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     598500 
50434423080011040 LIVINGSTON DORY TR        414,160.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     598500 
50434423080011050 BERNSTEIN NORMAN & BERNSTEIN JUNE       197,243.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     448350 
50434423080011060 KAITZ LORRAINE & JOHN KAITZ H/W       856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     856800 
50434423080012010 ECKMAN AMY & AMY ECKMAN TR TITL HLDR       911,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     961800 
50434423080012020 SHELSTAN HLDG INC        500,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     500850 
50434423080012030 KHAZZAM MIRA ET AL P KHAZZAM C/O       651,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     651000 
50434423080012040 BAIME HARRIETTE K        601,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     651000 
50434423080012050 SPAMER OTTO JR & SPAMER CARMEL D       450,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     500850 
50434423080012060 BEACHCO INC ROSS MANELLA C/O       961,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     961800 
50434423080013010 MASINTER EDWIN B & HARRIET L MASINTER HARRIET L       354,790.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     981800 
50434423080013020 GARBIS JEFFREY S & GARBIS SARAH S       510,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     510850 
50434423080013030 WOLFF BABBETTE WOLFF BABBETTE TR       534,534.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     661000 
50434423080013040 KEATS ROBERT M KEATS ROBERT M TR       611,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     661000 
50434423080013050 PRANICH NORANIT TUI        510,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     510850 
50434423080013060 FRYER GLORIA        354,290.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     981800 
50434423080014010 CAKEBREAD STEVE M &        951,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1001800 
50434423080014020 KLEIN MICHAEL & KLEIN BRENDA       520,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 402 N 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     520850 
50434423080014030 FINN PHILIP H & FINN CAROL B       621,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     671000 
50434423080014040 WEINICK RITA        426,605.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     671000 
50434423080014050 CHERKAS GLORIA S        249,324.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     520850 
50434423080014060 STEIN NORMAN Y STEIN NORMAN Y TR       456,053.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1001800 
50434423080015010 BENNETT ROBERT & BENNETT ELLEN       1,021,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1021800 
50434423080015020 WILPON KENNETH I &        530,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     530850 
50434423080015030 WEISS RONALD &        681,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     681000 
50434423080015040 SPATZ DAVID        631,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     681000 
50434423080015050 TOLL CHARLES        480,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     530850 
50434423080015060 ROBINSON HERMAN & JEANNE R        1,021,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1021800 
50434423080016010 AVIV JOSEPH &        357,996.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1041800 
50434423080016020 MOY JOHN & MOY BONNIE       540,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     540850 
50434423080016030 ARGANESE GLORIA P        640,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     691000 
50434423080016040 JELIN SIMA KISLAK        691,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     691000 
50434423080016050 LENCHNER KENNETH & LINDA        540,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     540850 
50434423080016060 CAMM SAMUEL A & MARVIN A CAMM       357,996.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1041800 
50434423080017010 SLAVIN JEROME & SLAVIN JEAN       741,644.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1061800 
50434423080017020 SUTTON MIKE & CYNTHIA SUTTON CYNTHIA       253,030.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     550850 
50434423080017030 MOSCAHLADES HARRIET & STATIS JOHN ET AL       701,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     701000 
50434423080017040 SCHARER SEYMORE I & SCHARER VIVIAN J       425,311.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     701000 
50434423080017050 SPACK HARVEY SPACK JUDITH       550,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     550850 
50434423080017060 LAICH WALTER & KARIN LAICH KARIN       359,066.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1061800 
50434423080020010 BENNETT ROBERT & BENNETT ELLEN       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1979      0      23100 
50434423080020020 ANDRADE CARLOS P REV TRUST ANDRADE MARIA A REV TRUST       17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1979      0      17850 
50434423080020030 KLEID RICHARD M TR        17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1979      0      17850 
50434423080020040 EISENBERG RICHARD & EISENBERG ELLEN       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080020050 BIONDO CHARLES & BIONDO FRANCHESCA       17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1979      0      17850 
50434423080020060 BURGER DIANA        17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO C 6 S 0400 CONDO 1987      0      17850 
50434423080020070 MASSOUMI MAS G &        27,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1979      0      27300 
50434423080020080 VINIOS LOUIS N &        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1979      0      25200 
50434423080021010 KELNER ROBERT S & GAIL S        756,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     756000 
50434423080021020 GOLDEN ROBERT N & MARIANNE        438,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     438900 
50434423080021030 DENTON PETER & DENTON AUDREY       548,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     598500 
50434423080021040 SPIVAK WILLA TR        548,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     598500 
50434423080021050 GOLDSTEIN BRETT S & GOLDSTEIN HELEN H       274,814.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     438900 
50434423080021060 STERN FAMILY II LLC        856,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     856800 
50434423080022010 TISHMAN PETER &        961,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     961800 
50434423080022020 GINDES JOAN K & GINDES SAMUEL T       491,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     491400 
50434423080022030 MORITZ DONALD I & JANET        651,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     651000 
50434423080022040 STAFFORD RONALD & STAFFORD KAY       651,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     651000 
50434423080022050 LOWENSTEIN STANLEY & CLAIRE STANLEY LOWENSTEIN       246,586.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     491400 
50434423080022060 CARDIFF INV HOLDINGS CO INC        961,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     961800 
50434423080023010 SALM CARLA RAE        981,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     981800 
50434423080023020 HOLLAND PAUL J &        451,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     501400 
50434423080023030 RUBIN HAZEL RUBIN HAZEL TR       466,573.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     661000 
50434423080023040 GOLDBERG HERBERT & BARBARA        661,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     661000 
50434423080023050 COUPLAND MICHAEL & COUPLAND DANA       501,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     501400 
50434423080023060 BIONDO CHARLES & BIONDO FRANCHESCA       981,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137     981800 
50434423080024010 HALICKMAN JACK        1,001,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1001800 
50434423080024020 ZIMMERMAN RONALD & ZIMMERMAN JANE       511,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     511400 
50434423080024030 KLEID RICHARD M        427,105.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     671000 
50434423080024040 BRONSTEIN CARYL L        540,470.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     671000 
50434423080024050 AGRESTI MARK G &        511,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     511400 
50434423080024060 B & L GOULSTON REALTY TRUST GOULSTON BENJAMIN TR       1,001,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1001800 
50434423080025010 2696020 MANITOBA LTD        1,021,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1021800 
50434423080025020 SVIRSKY SEYMOUR        521,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     521400 
50434423080025030 BELOFF ARTHUR & BELOFF CLORINDA       545,908.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     681000 
50434423080025040 GREENBAUM IRENA IRENA GREENBAUM TR TITL HLDR       681,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     681000 
50434423080025050 FRIEDMAN SIDNEY & HELEN        521,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     521400 
50434423080025060 VINIOS LOUIS N &        1,021,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1021800 
50434423080026010 MAITLAND GUY E        1,041,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1041800 
50434423080026020 GELOSA D F TR        531,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     531400 
50434423080026030 KHALIFE GRACE        429,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     691000 
50434423080026040 KROSNEY RITA K        691,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     691000 
50434423080026050 HALPERN IRVING J & CARYL        531,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     531400 
50434423080026060 SCHWARTZAPFEL MARIE L        1,041,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1041800 
50434423080027010 LUTZ ELAINE B        359,066.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1061800 
50434423080027020 BOCIAN FRANK J JR        541,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     541400 
50434423080027030 SCHNIDER MARTIN L & JEAN M        701,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     701000 
50434423080027040 MASSOUMI MAS G &        430,311.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1979   2606     701000 
50434423080027050 TINDELL CYNTHIA        485,012.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     541400 
50434423080027060 ANDRADE CARLOS P REV TRUST ANDRADE MARIA A REV TRUST       1,061,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1979   2137    1061800 
50434423080030010 ROBERT J ZIFF ASSOC MICHAEL BACKER C/O       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030020 FIVE 72903 ALBERTA LTD        13,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1979      0      13650 
50434423080030030 WYDRA NANCILEE &        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030040 GOODSTEIN MARTIN        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030050 GELOSA D F TR        13,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1979      0      13650 
50434423080030060 CAKEBREAD STEVE M &        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030070 SVIRSKY SEYMOUR TR & SVIRSKY GLORIA TR       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030080 PERLMAN FRED TRUST ROSENSTEIN MARILYN PERSONAL REP       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030090 KEATS ROBERT M TRUST        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030100 GELLES DAVID TR & GELLES STEVEN TR       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030110 SHEAR HERBERT & BARBARA JOINT REV        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030120 SHAVELL WADE        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080030130 SCHNIDER MARTIN L & JEAN M        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080031010 LIEBERMAN BERNICE SOSNOW        461,397.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1979   2918     870450 
50434423080031020 GREENBERG FLORENCE        197,243.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1979   1908     580650 
50434423080031030 BEACH POINT LLC LEWIS P MILLER C/O       865,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1979   2918     865200 
50434423080032010 DRAFT HOWARD C TR LOUIS MALIKOW C/O       975,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1979   2918     975450 
50434423080032020 SHAVELL WADE        685,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1979   1908     685650 
50434423080032030 APTER SUSAN G        970,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1979   2918     970200 
50434423080033010 HOROWITZ PHYLLIS        473,770.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1979   2918     995450 
50434423080033020 SHAPIRO ELLEN S REV TRUST SHAPIRO ELLEN S TR       695,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1979   1908     695650 
50434423080033030 GELLES DAVID TR & GELLES STEVEN TR       990,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1979   2918     990200 
50434423080034010 WINSTON GLORIA        474,839.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1015450 
50434423080034020 CLB TRUST & BAGAN GRANT A TRS &       705,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1979   1908     705650 
50434423080034030 EISENBERG RICHARD & EISENBERG ELLEN       579,325.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1010200 
50434423080035010 SCHAPS RICHARD & SCHAPS LINDA       1,035,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1035450 
50434423080035020 RAPHAEL MARJORIE & RAPHAEL STEPHEN E       715,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1979   1908     715650 
50434423080035030 SHEAR HERBERT & BARBARA JOINT REV        1,030,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1030200 
50434423080036010 BRATMAN ALLAN TR        680,748.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1055450 
50434423080036020 GOLDSMITH JAY & GOLDSMITH DIANE       725,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1979   1908     725650 
50434423080036030 PERLMAN FRED TESTAMENTARY TRUST        1,050,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1050200 
50434423080037010 CASAVANT BERNARD TRUST & CASAVANT MONIQUE G TRUST       1,075,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1075450 
50434423080037020 MOSS EUGENE & NANCY MOSS NANCY       288,437.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1979   1908     735650 
50434423080037030 WYDRA NANCILEE &        1,070,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1979   2918    1070200 
50434423080040010 BEACHCO INC ROSS MANELLA C/O       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040020 KAITZ JOHN & LORRAINE        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040030 SCHARER SEYMORE I & VIVIAN J        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040040 WINSTON GLORIA        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040050 GOLDSMITH JAY & GOLDSMITH DIANE       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040060 FINN PHILIP H & FINN CAROL B       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040070 WEINICK RITA        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040080 HALICKMAN JACK        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040090 BOCIAN FRANK J JR        14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423080040100 BRATMAN ALLAN TR AXELRAD SALLY       14,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442308 BEACH POINT CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1979      0      14700 
50434423090010011 ROSEBUSH JAMES S & ROSEBUSH NANCY P       720,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1979   2423     720300 
50434423090010012 FOGEL JANE JANE FOGEL MARITAL TRUST       668,787.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1979   2423     811650 
50434423090010013 ANGELUS HARRY M TR & MICHAEL K ANGELUS, ESQ  C/O       821,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1979   2423     821650 
50434423090010014 DRUXERMAN ALVEN R & RUTH        831,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1979   2423     831650 
50434423090010015 FISHMAN JULIUS & RUTH FISHMAN RUTH       300,616.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1979   2423     841650 
50434423090010016 POLITZER JERALD S & POLITZER JAMIE L       851,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0016 0400 CONDO 1979   2423     851650 
50434423090010017 DI PAOLO ANTHONY & HERMAN SURVIVORS C/O       700,430.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1979   2423     861650 
50434423090010021 FURMAN SUSAN        335,676.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1979   2266     770700 
50434423090010022 DOPPELT NEIL & ADAMS AUDREY       861,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1979   2266     861000 
50434423090010023 MARANTZ LEON A        375,046.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1979   2266     871000 
50434423090010024 ROSENFELD SYLVIA        881,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1979   2266     881000 
50434423090010025 BORAK PHYLLIS H        841,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1979   2266     891000 
50434423090010026 VONDRAK MIN        486,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1979   2266     901000 
50434423090010027 MOLNAR LASZLO & ERIKA MOLNAR ERIKA       384,389.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0027 0400 CONDO 1979   2266     911000 
50434423090010031 AGGER SUSAN TR        743,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1979   2434     743400 
50434423090010032 CRAMER HAROLD & CONNOLLY ASSOCIATES C/O       834,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1979   2434     834750 
50434423090010033 DEPHOURE STEPHEN        794,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1979   2434     844750 
50434423090010034 ROSETTI JOSEPH R & ROSETTI CAROL       804,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1979   2434     854750 
50434423090010035 SIMON SUE S TRUST        864,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1979   2434     864750 
50434423090010036 NUSBAUM VIRGINIUS H & S L NUSBAUM REALTY CO C/O       874,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1979   2434     874750 
50434423090010037 CRAVETZ MARVIN L &        834,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0037 0400 CONDO 1979   2434     884750 
50434423090020011 BONAN SEON P & JANET R        1,038,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1979   2464    1038450 
50434423090020012 SEGAL JOSEPH N & SEGAL JILL T       1,048,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1979   2464    1048450 
50434423090020013 FRAGMAN ROBERT & IRMA        1,058,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1979   2464    1058450 
50434423090020014 AXELROD GERALD A AXELROD ARLENE S       300,616.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1979   2464    1068450 
50434423090020015 EISEMAN STEVEN & EISEMAN SUSAN       1,078,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1979   2464    1078450 
50434423090020016 STIGLMEIER JOHN JR & STIGLMEIER CAROL ANNE       1,038,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0016 0400 CONDO 1979   2464    1088450 
50434423090020017 KATZ BETTY H        300,616.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1979   2464    1098450 
50434423090020021 HANSON STEPHEN P        1,078,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1979   2509    1128750 
50434423090020022 LUSTBADER PAULA M LUSTBADER BRIAN G TR       1,098,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1979   2509    1148750 
50434423090020023 FREEDMAN ROGER M & FREEDMAN PAMELA G       1,118,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1979   2509    1168750 
50434423090020024 SAUCIER SERGE        1,188,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1979   2509    1188750 
50434423090020025 PALM BEACH STRATFORD LTD        1,208,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1979   2509    1208750 
50434423090020026 KHAZZAM ALBERTINE S        404,768.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1979   2509    1228750 
50434423090020027 CREGGY STUART        1,248,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0027 0400 CONDO 1979   2509    1248750 
50434423090020031 KUSULAS PETER &        1,235,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1979   2867    1235850 
50434423090020032 6008771 CANADA INC BELL RUDICK EDELSTEIN LESCO C/O       1,255,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1979   2867    1255850 
50434423090020033 PERL JEROME &        1,275,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1979   2867    1275850 
50434423090020034 PRATLEY ELKE        1,169,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1979   2598    1169700 
50434423090020035 SCHLANG MAURICE H & BARBARA M SCHLANG BARBARA M       400,095.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1979   2598    1189700 
50434423090020036 AMATO ROBERT A & AMATO NANCY L       1,159,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1979   2598    1209700 
50434423090020037 SCHOUELA EZEKIEL ATTN: ALAIN CHARPENTIER       1,229,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0037 0400 CONDO 1979   2598    1229700 
50434423090030010 FREEDMAN ROGER M & FREEDMAN PAMELA G       43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030020 CRAVETZ MARVIN & CRAVETZ SUSAN       43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030030 MOLNAR LASZLO & ERIKA        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030040 STIGLMEIER JOHN JR & STIGLMEIER CAROL ANNE       43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030050 PRATLEY ELKE        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030060 PERL RICHARD &        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030070 BORAK PHYLLIS H        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030080 HANSON STEPHEN P        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030090 SCHOUELA EZEKIEL ATTN: ALAIN CHARPENTIER       43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030100 KUSULAS PETER & KUSULAS IRENE       43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030110 KHAZZAM ALBERTINE S        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030120 LUSTBADER PAULA M TRUST LUSTBADER BRIAN G TR &       43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030130 CREGGY STUART        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423090030140 DRUXERMAN ALVEN R & RUTH        43,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442309 PALM BEACH STRATFORD CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1979      0      43050 
50434423100011010 FATICA ANTHONY M & FATICA ANNETTE       435,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     435750 
50434423100011020 GOLDSTEIN MORTON        395,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     395850 
50434423100011030 SPIELMAN CAROL        118,412.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     367500 
50434423100011040 SAS CHRISTOPHER & LERNER BEVERLEY       450,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     450450 
50434423100011050 MASON JOYCE B        445,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     445200 
50434423100011060 GROSSMAN CARL &        367,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     367500 
50434423100011070 ROSS ALLEN        316,345.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     395850 
50434423100011080 COHEN WILFRED & ANITA COHEN ANITA       142,140.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     435750 
50434423100012010 CLYDE JAMES & CLYDE SHEILA       390,248.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     445750 
50434423100012020 TANZ GILDA        400,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     400850 
50434423100012030 WENGER MARVIN & LYNDA        372,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     372500 
50434423100012040 BARRON JANE M        460,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     460450 
50434423100012050 JUDICKE HAROLD & INGRID        455,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     455200 
50434423100012060 LEVINE BARBARA R LEVINE BARBARA R TR       119,513.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     372500 
50434423100012070 PRIEGO VICTOR & PRIEGO MARTHA       400,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     400850 
50434423100012080 HESSOL LAWRENCE        143,240.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     445750 
50434423100013010 SIMON LORON M & STEIN ELAINE Z       144,341.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     455750 
50434423100013020 ROSENOW JANET ROSENOW JANET A TR       147,387.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     405850 
50434423100013030 GRUNFELD RUDY & MARGARET GRUNFELD MARGARET       120,614.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     377500 
50434423100013040 BEDERMAN ALFRED BEDERMAN ALFRED TR       386,025.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     470450 
50434423100013050 KAYE WILLIAM A TRS        465,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     465200 
50434423100013060 COHEN GRACE S        120,114.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     377500 
50434423100013070 ALTMAN MILDRED        147,387.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     405850 
50434423100013080 ST MARIE JAYNE & ST MARIE RICHARD       400,805.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     455750 
50434423100014010 TATZ WILLIAM R TATZ EILEEN M       297,214.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     465750 
50434423100014020 FUHRMAN JANET A        148,489.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     410850 
50434423100014030 SCHIFF MARILYN        382,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     382500 
50434423100014040 JOSEPHS JEROME &        266,973.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     480450 
50434423100014050 HOBERMAN VALERIE WARD HOBERMAN VALERIE WARD TR       189,706.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     475200 
50434423100014060 KARPF JOSEPH P & HARRIET KARPF HARRIET       121,714.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     382500 
50434423100014070 SALOMON SUTTON PLACE TRUST        410,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     410850 
50434423100014080 LUBY CINDY H & YELLIN JEFFREY S       465,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     465750 
50434423100015010 POPPER TRUST KHANDARA TRUST INC TR       504,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     504000 
50434423100015020 SCHWARTZ SYLVIA        176,507.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     464100 
50434423100015030 LEON ARNOLD & TELSA        555,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1981   2796     555450 
50434423100015040 MANDELL ABE        550,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1981   2796     550200 
50434423100015050 ABRAMS JANE R STEIN MIMI TR       176,007.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     464100 
50434423100015060 FELBER HACKENBERG LLC & FELBER DIANA       504,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     504000 
50434423100021010 ODAY JAMES F JR & ODAY MICHELLE R       373,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     373800 
50434423100021020 THOMAS BRUCE &        379,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     379050 
50434423100021030 BENJAMIN BRUCE J ET AL        348,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     348600 
50434423100021040 BERGER THEODORE & BERGER ELLEN       437,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     437850 
50434423100021050 SCHMITT MARGARET M        170,888.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     432600 
50434423100021060 SHARE MILDRED C        105,193.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     348600 
50434423100021070 YOUNG JUDITH L        329,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     379050 
50434423100021080 BERRY F NORMAN TR        373,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     373800 
50434423100022010 HEIMLICH MARY T HEIMLICH MARY T TR       252,412.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     439950 
50434423100022020 PINTO DAVID &        135,826.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     384050 
50434423100022030 SCHWAB GEORGE & SCHWAB HILDEGARDE       184,883.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     353600 
50434423100022040 GRANT MURIEL J        157,429.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     447850 
50434423100022050 WILNER JACQUELINE K & BURTON L WILNER       157,429.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     442600 
50434423100022060 DRIMER MAURICE & MARYANN MARYANN DRIMER       106,795.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     353600 
50434423100022070 GUARDINO SCOTT F &        384,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     384050 
50434423100022080 IRVING LUCILLE A        128,440.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     439950 
50434423100023010 GREENE LAWRENCE M & GREENE GAYNELLE S       449,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     449950 
50434423100023020 RUBIN ARNOLD J TR & RUBIN ADRIENNE R TR       389,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     389050 
50434423100023030 LOUIS CHESTER P & EDNA I        358,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     358600 
50434423100023040 GRAYSON MORTON        158,528.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     457850 
50434423100023050 BENNETT PAUL H        158,028.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     452600 
50434423100023060 KRAMER ARLENE KRAMER ARLENE TR       107,895.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     358600 
50434423100023070 DAVIS BEVERLY TR & BEVERLY LEONARD EST TR       389,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     389050 
50434423100023080 CHEUNG KATHERINE        449,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     449950 
50434423100024010 MARAVELL E STACEY        146,345.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     459950 
50434423100024020 VINIOS NICHOLAS        394,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     394050 
50434423100024030 NETZKY JANICE        108,995.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     363600 
50434423100024040 KLUFER ROBERT E & ALYSE J        467,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     467850 
50434423100024050 MAANAVI DARIUSH P & MAANAVI DARYADOKHT       462,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1981   2266     462600 
50434423100024060 LEFES STEPHANIE E        136,995.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1981   1780     363600 
50434423100024070 SILKEN STANLEY S & SYLVIA SILKEN SYLVIA       116,714.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     394050 
50434423100024080 YAO ALICE C & BENITA C YAO       459,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     459950 
50434423100025010 ALTCHEK DOUGLAS D &        508,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     508200 
50434423100025020 CLAY VIRGINIA J TR        133,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     444150 
50434423100025030 WEISS ARNOLD &        542,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1981   2796     542850 
50434423100025040 LASSER LAWRENCE J        537,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1981   2796     537600 
50434423100025050 SHEIB BARBARA        444,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1981   1830     444150 
50434423100025060 ROTHBERG SYLVIA        508,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1981   1542     508200 
50434423100030010 IRVING SAMUEL & LUCILLE A        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030020 MANDEL ABE        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030030 GRAYSON MORTON        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030040 BARRON JANE M        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030050 GUARDINO SCOTT F & GUARDINO NANCY A       25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030060 LEON ARNOLD H & TELSA        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030070 KARPF JOSEPH M & HARRIET        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030080 KLUFER ROBERT E & ALYSE J        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030090 BENJAMIN GERALD ET AL        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030100 VINIOS NICHOLAS        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030110 TATZ WILLIAM R TRUST & TATZ EILEEN M TRUST       25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030120 LASSER LAWRENCE J        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423100030130 YELLIN JEFFREY S &        25,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442310 SUTTON PLACE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1981      0      25200 
50434423110000000 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CORP        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968      0        125 
50434423110001010 TREPECK NORMAN        316,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     366450 
50434423110001020 PATTNER AUSTIN M & PATTNER REINA L       357,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     357000 
50434423110001030 LEAND PAUL M & BARBARA G LEAND TRS       347,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 103 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     347550 
50434423110001040 SLEGMAN ROBERT M & BETTY H        338,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 104 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     338100 
50434423110001050 CAPLAN BERNARD JR & CAPLAN DOROTHY L       175,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 105 0510 CO-OP 1968    841     175350 
50434423110001060 BRENNAN BARBARA A &        175,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     175350 
50434423110001070 FERRUZZI EVELYN        175,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     175350 
50434423110001080 ZABRISKIE JOHN W        141,386.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 108 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     284550 
50434423110001090 1153898 ONTARIO LTD        284,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 109 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     284550 
50434423110001100 STROLLA SUSAN        141,386.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 110 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     303450 
50434423110001110 1408865 ONTARIO LTD        344,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 111 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     344400 
50434423110001120 BEE CHRISTOPHER J        386,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 112 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     386400 
50434423110002010 PERLMAN MARTIN & HASSAN JO ANN       381,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 201 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     381450 
50434423110002020 117065 CANADA INC C/O JANIE ETINSON       372,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     372000 
50434423110002030 LANAU LUISA        307,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 203 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     357550 
50434423110002040 KANDEL LOTTIE        353,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 204 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     353100 
50434423110002050 STUART FLORA J TRUST        96,007.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 205 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     324450 
50434423110002060 SCHWOLSKY MYRA        180,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 206 0510 CO-OP 1968    841     180350 
50434423110002070 REINHARDT SUSAN E        180,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 207 0510 CO-OP 1968    841     180350 
50434423110002080 HUFFMAN RICHARD R & HUFFMAN CATHEY A       289,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 208 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     289550 
50434423110002090 MILLER NANCY K        239,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 209 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     289550 
50434423110002100 SHAMOUN JACK & SHAMOUN COLETTE       308,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 210 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     308450 
50434423110002110 SILVERSTEIN NELSON & SILVERSTEIN SUE       146,824.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 211 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     349400 
50434423110002120 GOZLAN LILIANE        353,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 212 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     353850 
50434423110003010 MADDALENA DOROTHY        164,070.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     396450 
50434423110003020 CHAPMAN CONSTANCE G        387,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     387000 
50434423110003030 SCHWARTZ SUSAN H        367,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 303 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     367550 
50434423110003040 ALLEN STEVEN M        368,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 304 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     368100 
50434423110003050 PREZEBEL DANIEL D        334,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 305 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     334450 
50434423110003060 GOODMAN E LAWRENCE & ANITA        185,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     185350 
50434423110003070 MALESARDI ROBERT E TRUST        185,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     185350 
50434423110003080 HESS RICHARD & HESS CAROL       152,261.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 308 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     294550 
50434423110003090 LAWRENCE RICHARD S        294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 309 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     294550 
50434423110003100 ZUBRIN CHARLES        151,761.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 310 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     313450 
50434423110003110 GUARINO RICHARD A        354,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 311 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     354400 
50434423110003120 KRECKOVSKY ANDREW        363,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 312 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     363850 
50434423110004010 PETERS CATHERINE A        361,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     411450 
50434423110004020 GRAIS THELMA H TRUST GRAIS THELMA H TRUSTEE       402,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     402000 
50434423110004030 TARATOOT LOUIS J        377,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 403 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     377550 
50434423110004040 WALDMAN MELVIN R & JANE A WALDMAN       383,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 404 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     383100 
50434423110004050 LAPPIN IRENE EST        344,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 405 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     344450 
50434423110004060 ANSON MARK A & VENTI RICHARD A       190,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     190350 
50434423110004070 BARGHINI SANDRA J        190,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     190350 
50434423110004080 LAZOWSKI MARCIA & LAZOWSKI ALAN       299,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 408 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     299550 
50434423110004090 SCHOENEMAN MIMI        299,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 409 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     299550 
50434423110004100 MURPHY MARGARET M        318,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 410 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     318450 
50434423110004110 HELLER TRUDE S        359,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 411 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     359400 
50434423110004120 BARHAM BARTON J & BARHAM MONA C       373,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 412 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     373850 
50434423110005010 KRAUSHAR MARVIN & GAYTHA        426,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     426450 
50434423110005020 SELINKA MOLLYE        387,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 502 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     387550 
50434423110005030 REISS VIVIAN S        99,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     417000 
50434423110005040 KONIGSBERG WILLIAM & COHEN PAULETTE       354,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 504 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     354450 
50434423110005050 SAXE LORRAINE L & SAXE JOSHUA E       163,135.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 505 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     398100 
50434423110005060 MADDELENA ARTHUR & MADDELENA DOROTHY       195,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     195350 
50434423110005070 KAUFMAN JOHN L & KAUFMAN LAURA M       195,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     195350 
50434423110005080 THOMAS JAMES H TRUST &        304,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 508 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     304550 
50434423110005090 NATOR HOLDINGS LTD        304,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 509 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     304550 
50434423110005100 SALMON FAYE F FAYE SALMON TR TITL HLDR       94,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 510 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     323450 
50434423110005110 LAWRENCE DAVID N LAWRENCE DEBORAH C       364,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 511 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     364400 
50434423110005120 WORTMAN MELVIN & RUTH        383,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 512 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     383850 
50434423110006010 HARTMANN LARRY E & HARTMANN LAURA       441,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     441450 
50434423110006020 GERSH JEROME & GERSH GLORIA       382,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     432000 
50434423110006030 BROOKS STEVEN & BROOKS KAREN       397,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 603 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     397550 
50434423110006040 GRIEMSMANN PAUL &        413,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 604 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     413100 
50434423110006050 TINELLI LOUIS C & HUNT ROBERT       314,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 605 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     364450 
50434423110006060 SCHWARTZ WENDY S        200,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     200350 
50434423110006070 GUERRIERO LEONARD J        200,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     200350 
50434423110006080 KAPLAN JOAN M        309,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 608 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     309550 
50434423110006090 BERKOW JACK B        309,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 609 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     309550 
50434423110006100 IORIO THEODORE JR        328,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 610 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     328450 
50434423110006110 AIZER RONALD &        369,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 611 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     369400 
50434423110006120 AIBEL FREDRIC L        393,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 612 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     393850 
50434423110007010 ROSENBERG BABETTE H        110,895.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     456450 
50434423110007020 WILNER ELI &        447,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     447000 
50434423110007030 WILNER ELI & WILNER BARBARA       407,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 703 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     407550 
50434423110007040 SIMON RUTH L        428,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 704 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     428100 
50434423110007050 LAPEY JOHN D & MONACHINO JENNIFER L       374,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 705 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     374450 
50434423110007060 WILNER ELI M & BRENNAN BARBARA A       205,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     205350 
50434423110007070 YOST DIANE L        131,599.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     205350 
50434423110007080 BAIG MUNAWAR BAIG KOUSER       110,895.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 708 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     314550 
50434423110007090 CANTER BLANCHE G        101,998.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 709 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     314550 
50434423110007100 KAMINER DAVID A        333,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 710 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     333450 
50434423110007110 DECAMP CRANE & DECAMP B SUSAN       374,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 711 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     374400 
50434423110007120 TAUB ROBERT B & ROBERT & MOLLY TAUB ET AL TR HLDRS       148,683.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 712 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     403850 
50434423110008010 GORDON DONALD        471,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 801 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     471450 
50434423110008020 BIENER MARTIN B & BIENER PHYLLIS N       179,446.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     462000 
50434423110008030 WILNER ELI & BRENNAN BARBARA       417,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 803 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     417550 
50434423110008040 BAKER RUTH P        103,293.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 804 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     443100 
50434423110008050 SIEGFELD ROBERT J & SIEGFELD LINDA       174,446.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 805 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     384450 
50434423110008060 THREADGILL WALTER L        323,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 806 0510 CO-OP 1968   1682     323400 
50434423110008080 PREZEBEL DANIEL D TRUSTEE        319,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 808 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     319550 
50434423110008090 WALDEN PEGGY L        103,793.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 809 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     319550 
50434423110008100 LAMM DOUGLAS G & LAMM LINDA       338,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 810 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     338450 
50434423110008110 MALESARDI ROBERT E MALESARDI ROBERT E TR       329,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 811 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     379400 
50434423110008120 AIBEL CARYL        413,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442311 AMBASSADOR SOUTH DEV CO-OP 812 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     413850 
50434423120000000 AMBASSADOR II CORP        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968      0        125 
50434423120001010 GAGLIARDI PATRICK & GAGLIARDI DELORES       366,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     366450 
50434423120001020 BOLLMANN NORBERT L        357,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     357000 
50434423120001030 KAHAN WALLACE & ROBERTA KAHAN ROBERTA       25,968.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 103 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     347550 
50434423120001040 BERKOWITZ LINDA & BERKOWITZ LEONARD       338,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 104 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     338100 
50434423120001050 AMBASSADOR II CORP        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294        131 
50434423120001060 WALKER CYRUS D & WALKER JOANNE M       175,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     175350 
50434423120001070 SOLOV BESS S        175,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     175350 
50434423120001080 VALENTI ARTHUR &        284,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 108 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     284550 
50434423120001090 POMMIER VIVIANNE        284,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 109 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     284550 
50434423120001100 NECTOW HAROLD NECTOW SHERYLE TRUST EST       303,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     303450 
50434423120001110 PERLMAN SUE L        294,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 111 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     344400 
50434423120001120 SINGER JEROME &        303,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 112 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     353850 
50434423120002010 QIU YONG & LIU NINI       371,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     371450 
50434423120002020 BETTS WILLIAM B TR        362,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     362000 
50434423120002030 SEANOR ANN G        352,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 203 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     352550 
50434423120002040 FARMER SHEILA G        343,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 204 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     343100 
50434423120002050 FREDERICK PHILIP & ROSALYN        324,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 205 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     324450 
50434423120002060 HAYES HOLIDAE H TRUST HAYES HOLIDAE H TRUSTEE       180,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     180350 
50434423120002070 ONIGA CRISTIAN V & ONIGA CRISTINA S       180,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     180350 
50434423120002080 HARDENNE JOHN & HARDENNE ROSWITHA       289,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 208 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     289550 
50434423120002090 SNYDER JUDY        26,051.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 209 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     289550 
50434423120002100 HAYES HOLIDAE H TRUST HAYES HOLIDAE H TRUSTEE       308,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     308450 
50434423120002110 HRISO EMMANUEL & HRISO CAROL       349,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 211 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     349400 
50434423120002120 KATES KENNETH P        358,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 212 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     358850 
50434423120003010 LEMAY FRANCIS L        320,811.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     376450 
50434423120003020 POST JENNIFER C        367,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     367000 
50434423120003030 SUTLAND FRANK & JOSEPHINE        357,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 303 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     357550 
50434423120003040 KAPLAN NATHALIE GERSCHEL LAMB KARYN GERSCHEL       348,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 304 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     348100 
50434423120003050 SHWAERY DAVID T &        329,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 305 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     329450 
50434423120003060 DUNCAN NANCY L SCHUG BETTY TR       185,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     185350 
50434423120003070 MANDRAGOURAS DAVID & MANDRAGOURAS JILL       185,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     185350 
50434423120003080 COLYANDRO ANTHONY J        294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 308 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     294550 
50434423120003090 HALLISY THOMAS C & HALLISY BETH H &       294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 309 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     294550 
50434423120003100 DOYLE VICKI C        313,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     313450 
50434423120003110 JACOB MARIA & JACOB ROBERT       154,469.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 311 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     354400 
50434423120003120 BRENNAN SUSAN P PULVER JUDITH       363,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 312 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     363850 
50434423120004010 CANZONIERO DANIEL J & CANZONIERO KATHY L       381,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 401 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     381450 
50434423120004020 WOLF MESHAKAI JEFFREY WOLF C/O       372,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     372000 
50434423120004030 WOLF JEFFREY &        362,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 403 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     362550 
50434423120004040 GERSCHEL CHRISTINE A        353,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 404 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     353100 
50434423120004050 BOTT HAROLD S & BOTT BARBARA       334,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 405 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     334450 
50434423120004060 ODONNELL DOUGLAS E & ODONNELL ANA       190,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     190350 
50434423120004070 GLASER MICHAEL & GLASER KATHLEEN       190,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     190350 
50434423120004080 NANFITO VINCENT JR        299,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 408 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     299550 
50434423120004090 BRANTS ALLEN        160,568.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 409 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     299550 
50434423120004100 CURHAN JOAN P        318,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     318450 
50434423120004110 GUTTMAN NAOMI        359,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 411 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     359400 
50434423120004120 CAIN GLORIA D        27,220.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 412 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     368850 
50434423120005010 SCHEPPS DORIS        27,804.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     386450 
50434423120005020 DIMON THEODORE        377,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     377000 
50434423120005030 CALOIA PATRICIA        367,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 503 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     367550 
50434423120005040 GLASSMAN ALEXANDER & SELMA        358,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 504 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     358100 
50434423120005050 MICHAEL HOLDINGS FLORIDA LAND TRUST CAPLAN LAWRENCE A TRUSTEE       339,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 505 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     339450 
50434423120005060 SASSOS THOMAS &        195,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     195350 
50434423120005070 CZIZIK EDWARD &        195,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     195350 
50434423120005080 GAGLIARDI PATRICK & GAGLIARDI SARAH       304,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 508 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     304550 
50434423120005090 DEMARTINO GEORGE & DEMARTINO ROXANNE       304,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 509 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     304550 
50434423120005100 EHRENBERG SHIRLEY        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     323450 
50434423120005110 QUINN WALTER        364,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 511 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     364400 
50434423120005120 KALMAN LAURIE        373,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 512 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     373850 
50434423120006010 SAND & SEA HOLDINGS LAND TRUST CAPLAN LAWRENCE A TRUSTEE       391,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     391450 
50434423120006020 FELDMAN ARLENE &        382,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     382000 
50434423120006030 BLACK BETTY        372,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 603 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     372550 
50434423120006040 BARRON PEARL F BARRON PEARL F TR       363,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 604 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     363100 
50434423120006050 WALKER G H III & CLARICE D        344,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 605 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     344450 
50434423120006060 GYSBERTSEN GLORIA        200,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     200350 
50434423120006070 FUCHS DANIEL H        200,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     200350 
50434423120006080 GREENBERG BARBARA        309,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 608 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     309550 
50434423120006090 LAVIN KATHI        259,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 609 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     309550 
50434423120006100 ZION MARTIN J & JANE ZION JANE       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     328450 
50434423120006110 BARNESS AMNON & BARNESS CAREN       369,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 611 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     369400 
50434423120006120 FINE ANDREW & FINE MORRIS       378,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 612 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     378850 
50434423120007010 MARCUS ROSANNA B        28,974.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     396450 
50434423120007020 SLAGLE EDWARD H & NELLIE L        387,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     387000 
50434423120007030 KITTENPLAN STEPHEN & GOLDSMITH JULIET       377,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 703 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     377550 
50434423120007040 FIORE RAYMOND J        318,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 704 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     368100 
50434423120007050 BENETSON LAURA L        28,974.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 705 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     349450 
50434423120007060 RAYA ALBERT & RAYA GLORIA       205,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     205350 
50434423120007070 MACKAY DAVID JR &        205,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     205350 
50434423120007080 SERGI THOMAS F & SERGI ANGELA R       264,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 708 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     314550 
50434423120007090 BIAFORE JOHN D &        314,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 709 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     314550 
50434423120007100 ZIRIN FLORENCE        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     333450 
50434423120007110 REILLY MARY ANNE T & MILL NECK ESTATES C/O       374,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 711 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     374400 
50434423120007120 FISHMAN NATHAN & FISHMAN RUTH       383,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 712 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     383850 
50434423120008010 BOK SCOTT L &        401,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     401450 
50434423120008020 GOYANES JOHN & GOYANES MERIDITH       392,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     392000 
50434423120008030 KLEIN NANCY        382,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 803 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     382550 
50434423120008040 HAYES HOLIDAE H TRUST        373,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 804 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     373100 
50434423120008050 SHERMAN CAROL A        30,058.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 805 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     354450 
50434423120008060 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION        210,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     210350 
50434423120008070 BAILEY MICHAEL E & BAILEY MARY E       210,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    841     210350 
50434423120008080 NICHOLS MARY R        319,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 808 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     319550 
50434423120008090 HOWE JAMES P & HOWE ANNE M       319,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 809 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     319550 
50434423120008100 DORFMAN PHYLLIS        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 810 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     338450 
50434423120008110 MATHEISON MICHAEL &        379,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 811 0510 CO-OP 1968   1294     379400 
50434423120008120 MORIN PINO & MORIN ZORA       388,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442312 AMBASSADOR II CORP CO-OP 812 0510 CO-OP 1968   1344     388850 
50434423130000000 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO OP        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963      0        125 
50434423130001040 MORGAN CHARLOTTE C        62,522.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1460     276150 
50434423130001050 WEINSTEIN ANDY &        174,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 105 0510 CO-OP 1963    740     174300 
50434423130001060 JACOBS LEONARD        174,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 106 0510 CO-OP 1963    740     174300 
50434423130001070 FRANKEL ROBERT        256,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     256200 
50434423130001090 LEVINSON STEPHEN L &        214,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 109 0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     214200 
50434423130001100 MORGAN CHARLOTTE C        46,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    235      46200 
50434423130002010 TAGLIALATELLA SALLY DJT FINE ART C/O       102,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     102900 
50434423130002020 MILFIVE INVESTMENTS INC HAROLD MILAVSKY C/O       313,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1785     313950 
50434423130002040 CARO ALEXANDRA        258,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     258200 
50434423130002050 DARLING HARRY R & DARLING JANE C       176,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     176300 
50434423130002060 POLLOCK SUSAN R        176,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     176300 
50434423130002070 POLLOCK MARY M        258,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     258200 
50434423130002080 HALPERIN CLARA        196,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    975     196350 
50434423130002090 LERNER PETER & LERNER SUSAN       216,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     216200 
50434423130002100 TOMAE LOIS & TOMAE ANTHONY       102,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     102900 
50434423130003010 BARASCH MARVIN        104,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     104900 
50434423130003020 FOX PARK CORP & HERMAN ROBINSON % J BREEN       290,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 302 0510 CO-OP 1963   1460     290850 
50434423130003030 BILLET SARA        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    560      93450 
50434423130003040 GROTTA LOUIS W JR & SUZANNE G NIMAROFF       260,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     260200 
50434423130003050 COHEN IRVIN H        178,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     178300 
50434423130003060 BROSTOFF PHILIP & ANITA        178,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     178300 
50434423130003070 SHAPIRO KATHY        260,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     260200 
50434423130003080 BEIZER HARRIET & SWEDISH KATHLEEN       198,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    975     198350 
50434423130003090 BRILL MALCOLM & ESTELLE        218,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     218200 
50434423130003100 BASH BRIAN A TR        104,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     104900 
50434423130004010 WEINSTEIN HELEN L        106,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     106900 
50434423130004020 HIRTZ GLORIA G        76,565.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     220200 
50434423130004030 ABOUZEID DIANA        95,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    560      95450 
50434423130004040 SPAMER OTTO        262,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 404 0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     262200 
50434423130004050 SCHOEMAN WALTER G        180,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     180300 
50434423130004060 LEVENSON EDGAR C/O PATRICIA CINGLE/PNC BANK       180,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     180300 
50434423130004070 ROBBINS PATRICIA        262,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     262200 
50434423130004080 DAVIS ARNOLD J        200,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    975     200350 
50434423130004090 GREENSPAN BERNICE        39,991.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     220200 
50434423130004100 SCHWAM WENDY        106,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     106900 
50434423130004110 LEVENSON EDGAR PATRICIA CINGLE, PNC BANK C/O       46,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    235      46200 
50434423130005010 KROHNGOLD ROBERT        108,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     108900 
50434423130005020 WERSHAW FREDERICK I & WERSHAW BEVERLY S       222,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     222200 
50434423130005030 GREENFIELD JEAN & GREENFIELD AMY W       97,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 503 0510 CO-OP 1963    560      97450 
50434423130005040 GROSSMAN SHIRLEY D        264,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     264200 
50434423130005050 TREUHOLD CHARLES R & TREUHOLD ROBERT C       182,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     182300 
50434423130005060 GREEN DONALD L TR        182,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     182300 
50434423130005070 RITZ EDWARD C & IRENE K        264,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     264200 
50434423130005080 MCKENNA JAMES A        202,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    975     202350 
50434423130005090 BRANDT JOANNE L TRUST        222,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     222200 
50434423130005100 GELBART ARTHUR A & GELBART ROSE       108,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     108900 
50434423130005110 GREENFIELD JEAN & GREENFIELD AMY W       46,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1990    235      46200 
50434423130006010 BLUM LEAH        110,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     110900 
50434423130006020 SCHNEIDMAN LORRAINE        224,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     224200 
50434423130006030 APPEL JOAN R REILLY WILLIAM J       126,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 603 0510 CO-OP 1963    785     126000 
50434423130006040 ODONNELL JOHN L & MICHELE F ODONNELL       266,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     266200 
50434423130006050 BILLET EDWIN BILLET SARA       184,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     184300 
50434423130006060 TARSHIS LAURENCE J & GRETA        184,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     184300 
50434423130006070 ZOMER YOHANAN S & ZOMER CYNTHIA       266,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     266200 
50434423130006080 SCHNECK SYBIL B        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 608 0510 CO-OP 1963    560      99450 
50434423130006090 2000A FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP & 2000K FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP       224,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1225     224200 
50434423130006100 GOLD ABE & HONEY K        110,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    740     110900 
50434423130006120 COHEN IRVIN H & ELEANOR S        46,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    235      46200 
50434423130007010 LEVINSON STEPHEN L &        704,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 701 0510 CO-OP 1963   1500     704550 
50434423130007020 BARASCH MICHAEL & BARASCH CANDACE       372,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1280     372750 
50434423130007030 BARASCH PHYLLIS P        429,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1500     429450 
50434423130007040 RISMAN ROBERT R & KATHY        429,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963   1500     429450 
50434423130007110 MICHELSON ROBERT & VRIS JANE       100,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     100800 
50434423130007120 MCLAUGHLIN JOHN C & GERALDINE D MCLAUGHLIN       100,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     100800 
50434423130007130 PAPIO MICHAEL F &        100,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 713 0510 CO-OP 1963    700     100800 
50434423130007140 MITNIK RAYMOND NORTHEAST YONKERS REALTY C/O       100,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     100800 
50434423130007150 MCNAMARA MICHAEL & MCNAMARA ALLISON       100,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     100800 
50434423130007160 POEL DEBRA        100,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     100800 
50434423130007170 MCCOLL WALTER        100,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     100800 
50434423130007210 KOCH PHYLLIS        102,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     102800 
50434423130007220 FRIEDMAN TOVA        102,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     102800 
50434423130007230 O R B LTD        102,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     102800 
50434423130007240 MURRAY EUGENE R & ARMSTRONG HELEN M       52,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     102800 
50434423130007250 SATULOFF ELAINE G        102,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     102800 
50434423130007260 SHIPEK MARK A & SHIPEK EDWARD J JR       102,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     102800 
50434423130007270 AUGUST FLORA        102,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     102800 
50434423130007310 WORLEY JENNINGS & JENNINGS & PAULINE WORLEY TR TITL HLDRS       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     104800 
50434423130007320 BEARNOT PATRICIA        104,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     104800 
50434423130007330 BRUGGEMAN PATRICK J        104,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     104800 
50434423130007340 CHORNA JULES L & JANET A        104,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     104800 
50434423130007350 HENWOOD COLLEEN        104,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     104800 
50434423130007360 MANCUSO PATRICIA S & MANCUSO DENNIS J       104,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     104800 
50434423130007370 SPEYER ALEXANDER C III & SPEYER SILVIA       104,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     104800 
50434423130007410 GILLIGAN DOROTHEA M        106,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     106800 
50434423130007420 SPEYER ALEX C JR        106,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     106800 
50434423130007430 FREUDENHEIM FRANCINE        106,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP 743 0510 CO-OP 1963    700     106800 
50434423130007440 ROSENTHAL JAMES  EST OF        106,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     106800 
50434423130007450 FINKEL ROBERT A & EILEEN        106,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     106800 
50434423130007460 FRIEDMAN HOWARD H        106,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     106800 
50434423130007470 BOSSA MICHAEL        106,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442313 AMBASSADOR HOTEL CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1963    700     106800 
50434423140000000 PALM WORTH INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962      0        125 
50434423140001000 WHITCOMB CATHY WESLEY INVESTMENTS INC C/O       94,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1000 0510 CO-OP 1962    748      94500 
50434423140001010 CURTIS BARBARA H        217,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1010 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     217350 
50434423140001020 LEARY ROBERT E & JUANITA        175,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962    858     175350 
50434423140001030 CASTILLO JEANNE & FRANK J MORTON JR       175,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962    858     175350 
50434423140001040 OBRYAN MARY A        198,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1040 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     198450 
50434423140001050 SCHUG BEVERLY H        198,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1050 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     198450 
50434423140001060 TIPLICK NANCY J & TIPLICK DANNY       198,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1060 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     198450 
50434423140001070 HOBSON DAVID A        93,540.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1070 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     315000 
50434423140001080 MOTE MICHAEL D &        167,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     217350 
50434423140001090 HAYDEN MILDRED C & HAYDEN WILLIAM J       122,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1090 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     122850 
50434423140001100 BURRILL JOHN A & BURRILL SANDRA L       122,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1100 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     122850 
50434423140001110 MOFFITT MICHAEL & MOFFITT CLAUDIA       122,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1110 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     122850 
50434423140001120 MORRIS MARGARET & HELEN OBRIEN       162,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962    858     162750 
50434423140001130 LILYHOLM CAROL M & LEONARD P LILYHOLM       162,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962    858     162750 
50434423140001140 FITZGERALD FRANK S & FITZGERALD KATHRYN R       24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 1140 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     315000 
50434423140002010 CURTIS KEVIN J & MCDONALD KAY C       227,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2010 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     227850 
50434423140002020 STINSON MARY S        196,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2020 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     196350 
50434423140002030 LAGANAS MARIE        196,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2030 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     196350 
50434423140002040 MCKINNEY JOHN M & SHIRLEY A        219,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2040 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     219450 
50434423140002060 OVERHISER RUTH        437,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962   1716     437850 
50434423140002070 MADSEN GRACE B TR        341,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2070 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     341250 
50434423140002080 FRIEDMAN STEPHEN L FRIEDMAN STEPHEN L TR       165,270.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2080 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     227850 
50434423140002090 APOSTOLICO JAMES M & APOSTOLICO SUSANNE C       75,660.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2090 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     127850 
50434423140002100 HANVEY WILLIAM E TR        127,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2100 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     127850 
50434423140002110 KELLER GLENN W & KELLER SUE A       127,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2110 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     127850 
50434423140002120 GRAIZIGER SHIRLEY P PALM WORTH REV TRUST        222,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2120 0510 CO-OP 1962   1008     222600 
50434423140002140 KRANENBERG DONALD M & EVE W        496,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 2140 0510 CO-OP 1962   1722     496650 
50434423140003010 BROWN BILL A        232,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3010 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     232850 
50434423140003020 NORTHRUP SCOT & ACKEMAN LYNDA       201,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3020 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     201350 
50434423140003030 ADDUCI FAMILY TR        201,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3030 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     201350 
50434423140003040 AULD DONALD T & AULD LINDA B       224,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3040 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     224450 
50434423140003050 BRENNAN LINDA        52,218.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3050 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     224450 
50434423140003060 HANVEY TRUST HANVEY WILLIAM E TR &       224,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3060 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     224450 
50434423140003070 NEMIROW VALERIE & SAMUEL TRUST        351,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3070 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     351250 
50434423140003080 GORMAN JOSEPHINE        232,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3080 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     232850 
50434423140003090 WING RICHARD N & ESTHER F WING ESTHER F       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3090 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     132850 
50434423140003100 MCMANUS JENNIE T        80,810.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3100 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     132850 
50434423140003110 311 PALM WORTH REV LAND TRUST MURPHY ROBERT TRUSTEE &       132,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3110 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     132850 
50434423140003120 CASE M CHARLOTTE        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3120 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     172750 
50434423140003130 MORGENSTERN ANN H        201,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3130 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     201350 
50434423140003140 FANNING EMORY M & FANNING DIANA E       351,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 3140 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     351250 
50434423140004010 BOYLE CAROL M        237,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4010 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     237850 
50434423140004020 JONES LILLIAN A TR LILLIAN A JONES TRUST       206,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4020 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     206350 
50434423140004030 JONES LILLIAN A TR LILLIAN A JONES TRUST       206,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4030 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     206350 
50434423140004040 NEMIROW SAMUEL B & NEMIROW VALERIE E       229,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4040 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     229450 
50434423140004050 MELLQUIST MICHAEL J        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4050 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     229450 
50434423140004060 CONGDON ROBERT E & BETTY J        229,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4060 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     229450 
50434423140004070 KOEHL BARBARA H        361,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4070 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     361250 
50434423140004080 CAIRNS WALTER J & CAIRNS MARY L       237,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4080 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     237850 
50434423140004090 WALLIS JEANNE G TRUST        137,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4090 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     137850 
50434423140004100 DURKIN KAREN & TWADDELL DAVID O       137,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4100 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     137850 
50434423140004110 ROTH DAVID L        137,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4110 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     137850 
50434423140004120 BROOKS DAVID        177,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 412 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     177750 
50434423140004130 BROOKS DAVID A        206,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4130 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     206350 
50434423140004140 PFEIFFER CHARLES & PFEIFFER MARY A       361,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 4140 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     361250 
50434423140005010 WHITLOCK DONNA R TR        242,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 5010 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     242850 
50434423140005020 KING WILLIAM P WILLIAM P KING TRUST HLDR       26,354.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962   1248     285600 
50434423140005040 ZIMMERMAN MARIAN E        353,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962   1326     353850 
50434423140005050 GERWIG DAVID D & VICKI I        234,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 5050 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     234450 
50434423140005060 DAY MARIAN A NELLIE J GRAVES TRS       234,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 5060 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     234450 
50434423140005070 GRAVES DONALD C TR GRAVES NELLIE J       371,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 507 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     371250 
50434423140005080 WOODLEY EILEEN P        242,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 5080 0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     242850 
50434423140005090 LAKES MILLARD        252,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962   1248     252000 
50434423140005110 JCL REVOCABLE LAND TRUST WEINTRAUB PETER B TRUSTEE       288,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962   1326     288750 
50434423140005120 LOVE THOMAS A & KATHRYN M LOVE       182,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 5120 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     182750 
50434423140005130 GRIMM MILDRED K        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP 5130 0510 CO-OP 1962    858     211350 
50434423140005140 GRINNELL JAMES E & GRINNELL MARY LOU       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442314 PALM WORTH INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1962   1014     341250 
50434423150000000 ROYAL SAXON INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968      0        125 
50434423150001020 SOUSA PATRICIA E        59,264.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     163800 
50434423150001030 FEDERICI JAMES        135,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     135450 
50434423150001040 HARRIS PAUL & HARRIS JANET       212,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     212100 
50434423150001050 RICH MARGARET C        183,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     183750 
50434423150001060 BRODY BERNARD R        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     212100 
50434423150001070 BUCARO JOHN & CAMPISI J P       183,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     183750 
50434423150001080 GOLDMAN JUNE N & GOLDMAN ROBERT S       163,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     163800 
50434423150001090 CLENNAN MARY E & CLENNAN ANN M       17,716.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     135450 
50434423150001100 AMICO MICHAEL & AMICO LINDA       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     163800 
50434423150001110 KELLY JEANETTE        17,716.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     135450 
50434423150001120 KANTER THELMA F & JOEL A KANTER TRS       218,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     218400 
50434423150001130 OSMAN HELENE S        190,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     190050 
50434423150001160 TACKEFF BERTRAM C & TACKEFF STERRA S       163,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     163800 
50434423150001170 LUTTER NILDA        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     183750 
50434423150001180 KOSEFF ALAN D &        212,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     212100 
50434423150001190 SCHULZ WOLFGANG W & SCHULZ PISHON B       183,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     183750 
50434423150001200 BARBER MARION        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     212100 
50434423150001210 LIDFORS ARNOLD R & LIDFORS MARION A       135,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     135450 
50434423150001220 BARBER MARION        163,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     163800 
50434423150001230 OCONNELL DANIEL        17,716.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     135450 
50434423150001240 KUIVALAINEN MARINA        163,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     163800 
50434423150001250 RUSH ZADO ANNA        40,575.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 1250 0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     190050 
50434423150001260 SPIVAK IRWIN & SPIVAK JANICE       67,557.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     218400 
50434423150002010 CONNOLLY MAUREEN        21,072.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     140450 
50434423150002020 ARO IRJA & ARO UNTO       123,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     173800 
50434423150002030 SILVA LEONOR & SILVA OSVALDO J       58,029.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     140450 
50434423150002040 GOBER JOYCE        222,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     222100 
50434423150002050 DEVANNEY MARY M        188,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     188750 
50434423150002060 DICARLO VICTOR        222,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     222100 
50434423150002070 ROSEN CLARA ROSEN CLARA TR       24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     188750 
50434423150002080 JAYE MILDRED R        4,686.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 2080 0510 CO-OP 1968    700     173800 
50434423150002090 GYORGY IRINA        22,141.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     140450 
50434423150002100 PEEPER JAMES        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     173800 
50434423150002110 VITULLI PETER A & KENDALL L        140,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     140450 
50434423150002120 JACOBY ROBERT & JACOBY DIANE R       178,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     228400 
50434423150002130 RUDNICK LORRAINE        195,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     195050 
50434423150002140 KRAMER EARL        228,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     228400 
50434423150002150 MICHAELY ADRIAN & ALINA        140,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     140450 
50434423150002160 HELMUS JAMES E        173,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     173800 
50434423150002170 DOMINI MARIE        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     188750 
50434423150002180 SILVERSTEIN INEZ R INEZ R SILVERSTEIN TR HLDR       24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     222100 
50434423150002190 TSAO MIRIAM T        188,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     188750 
50434423150002200 GOLDSTEIN FLORENCE        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     222100 
50434423150002210 SHIPEK EDWARD & SHIPEK MARK       140,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     140450 
50434423150002220 EISENBERG JOANNE &        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     173800 
50434423150002230 OCONNELL ROBERT        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     140450 
50434423150002240 PICARIELLO JEAN A & PICARIELLO MICHAEL R       123,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     173800 
50434423150002250 BOISSELLE CHARLES E & BOISSELLE CATHERINE       195,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 2250 0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     195050 
50434423150002260 SULKIN CECILE C & CABITT EDWARD       24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     228400 
50434423150003010 RAMOS PABLO &        145,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     145450 
50434423150003020 ARNONE VINCENT        183,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     183800 
50434423150003030 GRIMES ANTHONY S & GRIMES KERRY A       145,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     145450 
50434423150003040 DIXON 1997 FAMILY TRUST DIXON RICHARD J TRUSTEE &       232,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     232100 
50434423150003050 DELLERSON RITVA        143,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     193750 
50434423150003060 MANGIARDI EGIDIO B TRUST        232,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     232100 
50434423150003070 SCHMIDT JOHN C SCHMIDT HARRIET       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     193750 
50434423150003080 BEENE PATRICIA L        183,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     183800 
50434423150003090 MORRIS CHARLOTTE        23,429.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     145450 
50434423150003100 NELSON NORRIS J & RUTH E NELSON TRS       183,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     183800 
50434423150003110 MOY RUTH C        145,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     145450 
50434423150003120 WARNER PEGGY L        238,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     238400 
50434423150003130 SELTZER GARY & SELTZER JOAN       200,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     200050 
50434423150003140 TRAVIS COLE BEATRICE        39,863.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     238400 
50434423150003150 S & N PROPERTIES LLC        145,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     145450 
50434423150003160 CONNOR JAMES A & CONNOR JOAN M       183,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     183800 
50434423150003170 OSTROWSKI ANTHONY & OSTROWSKI DANUTA       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     193750 
50434423150003180 SUSSMAN LENORE        70,964.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     232100 
50434423150003190 ESSIG LINDA D &        193,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     193750 
50434423150003200 HILLER LANA & HILLER SIDNEY       232,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     232100 
50434423150003210 PARADA JOSE & ELVIRA        145,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     145450 
50434423150003220 JAKOB YVONNE        183,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     183800 
50434423150003230 NEWMAN LINDA        34,004.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     145450 
50434423150003240 KOSUNEN REINO        183,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     183800 
50434423150003250 JUDSON JAMES M        150,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     200050 
50434423150003260 HALPERN ARTHUR C TRUST        238,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     238400 
50434423150004010 SCHULTZ STEPHEN E        150,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     150450 
50434423150004020 SCHMIDT SCHLEGEL BERYL        193,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     193800 
50434423150004030 GOODMAN SANFORD WYSOKER AMY       150,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     150450 
50434423150004040 FROMER MILTON & MILDRED        242,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     242100 
50434423150004050 HYDE DEBORAH L        198,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 4050 0510 CO-OP 1968    935     198750 
50434423150004060 KLAYMAN THELMA & KLAYMAN MELVIN I TRS       242,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     242100 
50434423150004070 BEDWINEK CHARLOTTE & WIDROE MARGERY       24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     198750 
50434423150004080 BANTEL ALFRED & BEVERLY        193,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     193800 
50434423150004090 BABNIS MARY ANN        100,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     150450 
50434423150004100 GROSS NINA A        193,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     193800 
50434423150004110 PELTZ JO ANN        72,379.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 4110 0510 CO-OP 1968    700     150450 
50434423150004120 BARROW KENNETH &        248,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     248400 
50434423150004130 EDINBURG GOLDA M TRUST & PINKOWITZ JOAN E       205,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     205050 
50434423150004140 PAPERTH FREDERIC &        248,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     248400 
50434423150004150 COSTAL JOSE J & COSTAL ROSEMARY       150,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     150450 
50434423150004160 MENITOFF PAUL J & MENITOFF RITA J       193,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     193800 
50434423150004170 MORREALE JOSEPH        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     198750 
50434423150004180 SHAVEL LOTTE        73,204.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     242100 
50434423150004190 SELIGMAN ARLINE M        198,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     198750 
50434423150004200 ANTONOU LOUISE        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     242100 
50434423150004210 KINNUNEN HILKKA        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     150450 
50434423150004220 BERLINER WILLIAM        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     193800 
50434423150004230 CAPLAN JOYCE        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     150450 
50434423150004240 ZUSY PAMELA        26,469.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     193800 
50434423150004250 CASSIDY MARK C & CASSIDY EILEEN C       205,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     205050 
50434423150004260 MEMOLY GEORGE J SR &        42,975.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     248400 
50434423150005010 ALEXANDROFF NAOMI        155,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155450 
50434423150005020 FORESTA VICTOR D & FORESTA MARY R       203,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     203800 
50434423150005030 SNEED ANNE L LIVING TRUST SNEED ANNE L TRUSTEE       155,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155450 
50434423150005040 CLIETT STACY        252,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 5040 0510 CO-OP 1968    935     252100 
50434423150005050 ZELTZER BERNARD & SYLVIA        203,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     203750 
50434423150005060 BARNETT LESTER        252,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     252100 
50434423150005070 KELLY GEORGE W & GLORIA A        203,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     203750 
50434423150005080 EPSTEIN LISA        203,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     203800 
50434423150005090 MILLIS BERNARD & MILLIS LINDA N       155,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155450 
50434423150005100 DWYER THOMAS &        203,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     203800 
50434423150005110 BEYL MARIANNE        155,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155450 
50434423150005120 FERRARESE EILEEN & FERRARESE LOUIS       258,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     258400 
50434423150005130 PIROZZOLI RICHARD W & PIROZZOLI CANDACE E       210,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     210050 
50434423150005140 LORENZO FRANK & LORENZO MARGUERITA       150,488.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     258400 
50434423150005150 ELLSWORTH ROBERT C & BOLLINGER ELLSWORTH SUSAN R       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155450 
50434423150005160 WINFREY STUART & WINFREY CHRISTINE       203,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     203800 
50434423150005170 SURUCCI SERGIO & SURUCCI ELISABETA       203,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     203750 
50434423150005180 ARNONE VINCENT J & ARONE MARYANN       252,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     252100 
50434423150005190 CALL FRED M & CALL CATHERINE       203,750.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     203750 
50434423150005200 REICH WILLIAM Z        252,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    935     252100 
50434423150005210 BURZYNSKI JOHN J        155,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155450 
50434423150005220 DIMANNO PAUL & DIMANNO MARJORIE       203,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     203800 
50434423150005230 OAKS CAROLYN P        155,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155450 
50434423150005240 KONSTANIAKOPOULOS NICKOLAOS & KONSTANIAKOPOULOS ANASTASIA       203,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     203800 
50434423150005250 GERMAND ANN & GERMAND PETER J       139,212.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 5250 0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     210050 
50434423150005260 PROCHILO VINCENT & PROCHILO ANNA       258,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1150     258400 
50434423150006000 REEVES BRIAN TR        155,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    700     155400 
50434423150006010 AHO ARI & AHO SIRPA       255,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1323     255150 
50434423150006020 ARRONSON SHAVIE S ARRONSON SHAVIE S TR       94,422.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1323     291900 
50434423150006030 BLUTMAN MAX S & EDNA BLUTMAN EDNA       32,740.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1323     255150 
50434423150006040 PLATZNER COREY J & PLATZNER LINDA K       219,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    931     219450 
50434423150006050 GELB JOY L & FEINBERG GAY L       255,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 6050 0510 CO-OP 1968   1323     255150 
50434423150006060 PLATZNER COREY J & PLATZNER LINDA K       241,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 6060 0510 CO-OP 1968   1323     291900 
50434423150006070 REEVES BRIAN        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    931     191100 
50434423150006080 CARTER GEORGE E & CARTER DIANE S       169,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    931     219450 
50434423150006090 BOKOZANSKA DENNIS & BOKOZANSKA CATHY       141,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    931     191100 
50434423150006100 SOLIS VICTORIA        77,686.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 6100 0510 CO-OP 1968    935     257250 
50434423150006110 HELMUS JAMES E        255,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968   1323     255150 
50434423150006120 BIRNBAUM BERNARD I        219,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1968    931     219450 
50434423150006140 SCOTT FRANKLIN B &        91,303.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442315 ROYAL SAXON INC CO-OP 6140 0510 CO-OP 1968   1323     291900 
50434423160000000 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC        125.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969      0        125 
50434423160001010 HURWITZ LOUIS & ELEANOR WAGMAN       295,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 101 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001020 SPINNER HOPE        50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 102 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001030 MILLER JEANETTE        295,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 103 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001040 HIRSCH ELAINE        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 104 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001050 SCHILLER IRVING EST SCHILLER PATRICIA       295,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 105 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001060 HURWITZ LOUIS        295,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 106 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001070 FINK STEVEN &        232,220.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 107 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001080 ABRAMS LENORA TR        50,430.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 108 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001090 LYNN HAROLD        166,334.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 109 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     295050 
50434423160001100 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 110 0510 CO-OP 1969    850     128100 
50434423160001110 ALTSCHULER DORIS        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 111 0510 CO-OP 1969    850     128100 
50434423160001120 ABRAMS BARBARA        128,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 112 0510 CO-OP 1969    850     128100 
50434423160001130 WEIGERT STEPHEN        31,034.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 113 0510 CO-OP 1969    850     128100 
50434423160001140 WILEY JAMES C        274,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 114 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     274050 
50434423160001150 BOOKMAN ARTHUR A M        274,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 115 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     274050 
50434423160001160 JACOBSON JEAN        274,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 116 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     274050 
50434423160001170 KRATZ PAUL & HARRIS JAY       189,990.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 117 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     274050 
50434423160002010 LEO ANTHONY        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002020 SPEIGEL MARY        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002030 CARR PAULA        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002040 ZUCKER SUSAN        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002050 ROSSINOW HARVEY & ROSSINOW CHERYL       310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002060 MANNIS KENT & MANNIS VALERIE S       310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002070 FIORI PAMELA & GIVNER COLTON       310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002080 SELLERS SANDRA        310,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 208 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002090 HUT BETTY S        50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     310800 
50434423160002100 ROBINS PHYLLIS        40,337.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 210 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     284550 
50434423160002110 HERSHOVITZ CRAIG        88,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     138600 
50434423160002120 BLANC MICHAEL & BLANC DIMITRA       138,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1990    850     138600 
50434423160002130 KOLKER ROSALIE & KOLKER IRVIN       138,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     138600 
50434423160002140 MIKATI MAHMOUD &        200,290.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 214 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     284550 
50434423160002150 FELDMAN LOUIS        40,837.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 215 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     284550 
50434423160002160 WEILHEIMER HARRY & ELIZABETH        284,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 216 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     284550 
50434423160002170 ABBONDOLA VICTOR A & DICHTER JOAN       121,367.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 217 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     284550 
50434423160003010 LEVINE BORAH & LEVINE ELAINE       228,718.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     320800 
50434423160003020 INTRAUB SAUL & INTRAUB JUDY       263,120.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     320800 
50434423160003030 LASSER BEVERLY A        114,351.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     320800 
50434423160003040 ROTH HANNAH R TR        320,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     320800 
50434423160003050 OGILVIE MONIQUE        50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     320800 
50434423160003060 FEIGENBAUM JANE L FEIGENBAUM JANE L TR       50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     320800 
50434423160003070 BENSON P DOULGAS &        522,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1450     522900 
50434423160003080 CRAWFORD BRIAN        143,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     143600 
50434423160003090 ZALESKI ANTHONY &        320,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     320800 
50434423160003100 LIPMAN ROBERT D        289,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 310 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     289550 
50434423160003110 MERZ BERT & MERZ IRENE       143,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     143600 
50434423160003120 LORING ARLYNE        143,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     143600 
50434423160003130 MULLER LUCIENNE        143,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     143600 
50434423160003140 BENSON PAUL D &        289,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 314 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     289550 
50434423160003150 GROVEMAN MARCIA        40,837.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 315 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     289550 
50434423160003160 BRESLOW DORIS G        289,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 316 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     289550 
50434423160003170 SCHAFFER IRVING ANDREW SCHAFFER C/O       289,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 317 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     289550 
50434423160004010 SWENSON SUSAN O        330,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     330800 
50434423160004020 MENITOFF RITA &        273,420.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     330800 
50434423160004030 LEE GRACE        98,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     148600 
50434423160004040 LASSER STEPHEN & LASSER BEVERLY       532,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1450     532900 
50434423160004050 SCHNEIDER HOWARD & SCHNEIDER SANDRA       330,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     330800 
50434423160004060 WOLSKI WLADYSLAW & WOLSKI KAREN I       330,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     330800 
50434423160004070 WEISGAL FLORENCE        50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     330800 
50434423160004080 WALD KENNETH        330,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     330800 
50434423160004090 OCONNELL MARY C        330,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     330800 
50434423160004100 BURKE MARTHA        294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 410 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     294550 
50434423160004110 CASEY JUDITH CASEY INC JUDITH C/O       148,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     148600 
50434423160004120 SABA PAMELA A        41,306.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     148600 
50434423160004130 RINALDI JOHN A & RINALDI COLLEEN M       148,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     148600 
50434423160004140 MEISSER R STANLEY & FRANCES M        294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 414 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     294550 
50434423160004150 BERNSTEIN IRA A &        294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 415 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     294550 
50434423160004160 LIBERMAN SIMON & DOROTHY        294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     294550 
50434423160004170 GRAY WILLIAM R & ANDREWS ROBERT S       294,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     294550 
50434423160005010 WALLACH EDITH        340,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005020 DULL WALTER        50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005030 BUCHLER JOSEPH & BUCHLER GERTRUD       340,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005040 LEVY SIDNEY & RICHARD LEVY       50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005050 MURTHA JOHN J & CASEY JUDITH       50,930.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005060 HOFFMAN GLORIA        340,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005070 SIEGEL RONALD & SIEGEL PAULINE       340,800.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005080 LAUBER LUCILLE G        50,430.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005090 SCHLENGER RICHARD J SCHLENGER PAMELA A       283,720.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     340800 
50434423160005100 MCDONOUGH JOHN        299,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 510 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     299550 
50434423160005110 MCKENZIE GERALD A & MCKENZIE LOIS A       153,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     153600 
50434423160005120 MERLING SHIRLEY        153,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     153600 
50434423160005130 MENILLO MICHAEL &        153,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP  0510 CO-OP 1969    850     153600 
50434423160005140 COYLE JAMES F & COYLE EILEEN F       66,872.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 514 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     299550 
50434423160005150 BOEHM MARVIN J        299,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 515 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     299550 
50434423160005160 ROLAND EDYTHE        299,550.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 516 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     299550 
50434423160005170 PLATT BETTY        147,911.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442316 REGENCY OF PALM BEACH INC COOP 517 0510 CO-OP 1969   1150     299550 
50434423170000000 TWENTY SEVEN HUNDRED S OCEAN        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967      0        125 
50434423170001130 WILL CHARLES E & WILL KATHLEEN G       25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967    628      93450 
50434423170001140 ELDER CAROL        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967    628      93450 
50434423170001150 JEFFERY LYNN L TRUST GARSON NANCY B TRUSTEE       148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001160 LEE GRACE        148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001170 CONTI DORIS S        82,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP 117 0510 CO-OP 1967    628      82950 
50434423170001180 WEISENFELD PHYLLIS        148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001190 HARBER PHILIP & HARBER RONDA       148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001200 LIPSCHUTZ LILIAN EST        148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001210 WECHTER ARNOLD & ILENE        148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001220 GALVIN THOMAS M        148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001230 ANDERSON YOUNGEUN H        148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001240 KRAFT MELVIN D & KATHERINE J        148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170001250 GALVIN THOMAS & MARI GALVIN       148,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     148050 
50434423170002140 BZ PARTNERS 1983 1 THE PARK MANSIONS/H L ZEVE C/O       177,200.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1256     177200 
50434423170002150 LEE GRACE        153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002160 PERSON JOHN PERSON MARY       13,567.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002180 ROMANO ANTHONY KUZARA LINDA       153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002190 BLOKSBERG LEONARD        153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002200 PERLMAN RHODA        13,567.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002210 CHAMBERS HELEN        153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002220 HULL JOHN D & HULL SHARON B       153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002230 BIGELOW DWAYNE & MUSGRAVE ANGELA       153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002240 GIORDANO JOSEPH &        153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170002250 GALVIN THOMAS M & GALVIN MARI       153,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     153050 
50434423170003140 FRIEDLAND NORMA S FRIEDLAND NORMA S TR       24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1256     182200 
50434423170003150 LIPMAN LOUCEL G        13,567.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003160 SCHUMACHER JAMES & SCHUMACHER JANET       158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003170 GOULSTON BENJAMIN & LOIS        92,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP 317 0510 CO-OP 1967    628      92950 
50434423170003180 BOCK MORRIS & CAROLINE        158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003190 ROTH MORRIS & EVELINE        158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003200 GOLDEN SUE A        158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003210 GARSON THOMAS A & GARSON NANCY B       158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003220 MCMANUS RONALD F        158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003230 GARSON THOMAS & GARSON NANCY       158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003240 VINIK JACK        158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423170003250 JOHNSTON MATTHEW M & JOHNSTON KIMBERLY A       158,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442317 EDGEWATER HOUSE CORP CO-OP 325 0510 CO-OP 1967   1090     158050 
50434423180012010 BIRGER MARVIN BIRGER CAROLYN S       1,374,900.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1991   4370    2415000 
50434423180012020 KOREY SYLVIA V KOREY SYLVIA V TR       2,019,270.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 202 N 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2191350 
50434423180012030 THERIEN JOHN & CLAIRE CLAIRE THERIEN       983,054.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2362500 
50434423180013010 LINSEY THELMA        1,084,033.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2465000 
50434423180013020 SHAWE EARLE K & ANNETTE C ANNETTE C SHAWE       1,297,719.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2766350 
50434423180013030 RAFTIS CYNTHIA RAFTIS SPIROS G &       2,412,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2412500 
50434423180014010 PERLICK ESTHER        1,145,689.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2515000 
50434423180014020 LIFFLANDER CLAY & LIFFLANDER SUSAN       2,816,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2816350 
50434423180014030 GORDON BERNARD        2,412,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1991   4370    2412500 
50434423180015010 HELLER GERALD &        2,515,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2565000 
50434423180015020 93916 CANADA LIMITED        2,866,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2866350 
50434423180015030 TANZMAN DOROTHY SOUSA BARBARA TR       2,512,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2512500 
50434423180016010 GILBERT ELMA        1,294,172.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2615000 
50434423180016020 CHARMAN JOHN R        2,916,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2916350 
50434423180016030 CLINE MORGAN E &        2,562,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 001 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2562500 
50434423180022010 MCDONALD TIMOTHY & MCDONALD LUBA       2,362,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2362500 
50434423180022020 GILBERG FRANCES N        2,433,124.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1991   4040    2716350 
50434423180022030 LASSEN SIDNEY W & MARILYN S        2,415,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2415000 
50434423180023010 THREE 548474 MANITOBA INC        2,412,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1991   4370    2412500 
50434423180023020 CHELNIK HARRIETTE F TRUST CHELNIK HARRIETTE F TRUSTEE &       2,766,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2766350 
50434423180023030 SUSSMAN JOHN R        1,167,104.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2465000 
50434423180024010 ZIV SEYMORE L        2,462,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2462500 
50434423180024020 HERSCHEL VICTOR PROPERTY CORP HERSCHEL VICTOR C/O       2,816,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1991   4040    2816350 
50434423180024030 PERLICK PHYLLIS K TR        2,515,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1991   4370    2515000 
50434423180025010 SHECHTMAN IRWIN R & MARGARET        2,512,500.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2512500 
50434423180025020 COOPER MAX TRUST COOPER MAX TR       2,866,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2866350 
50434423180025030 STEINBERG JEAN        2,565,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2565000 
50434423180026010 FRASSETTO ALBERT & DIANA FRASSETTO DIANA       1,115,360.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4370    2562500 
50434423180026020 MESHBERG PHILIP & PHILIP MESHBERG TR TITL HLDR       1,337,334.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1990   4040    2916350 
50434423180026030 JOFFE DAVID        1,327,404.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442318 TWENTY SEVEN SEVENTY S OC CONDO 002 0400 CONDO 1991   4370    2615000 
50434423200002010 BORREGO CARLOS L        446,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 201 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     446000 
50434423200002020 MARULANDA MADELEINE        426,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 202 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     426000 
50434423200002030 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        387,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 203 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     387000 
50434423200002040 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        367,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 204 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     367000 
50434423200002050 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        392,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 205 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     392000 
50434423200002060 SANTIESTEBAN NELLY        372,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 206 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     372000 
50434423200002070 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        123,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 207 0400 CONDO 1970    517     123000 
50434423200002080 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        238,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 208 0400 CONDO 1970    861     238000 
50434423200002090 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        123,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 209 0400 CONDO 1970    517     123000 
50434423200002100 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        103,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 210 0400 CONDO 1970    517     103000 
50434423200002110 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        352,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 211 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     352000 
50434423200002120 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        103,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 212 0400 CONDO 1970    517     103000 
50434423200002140 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        332,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 214 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     332000 
50434423200002150 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        342,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 215 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     342000 
50434423200002160 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        322,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 216 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     322000 
50434423200002170 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        357,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 217 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     357000 
50434423200002180 CRUZ AMADO        337,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 218 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     337000 
50434423200003010 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        466,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 301 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     466000 
50434423200003020 PAINE EDWARD        446,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 302 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     446000 
50434423200003030 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        397,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 303 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     397000 
50434423200003040 SWADE MICHAEL H & SWADE BONNIE L       377,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 304 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     377000 
50434423200003050 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        402,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 305 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     402000 
50434423200003060 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        382,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 306 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     382000 
50434423200003070 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        133,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 307 0400 CONDO 1970    517     133000 
50434423200003080 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        248,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 308 0400 CONDO 1970    861     248000 
50434423200003090 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        133,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 309 0400 CONDO 1970    517     133000 
50434423200003100 SHERRILL GLADYS B        113,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 310 0400 CONDO 1970    517     113000 
50434423200003110 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        362,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 311 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     362000 
50434423200003120 SCHULTZ CHRISTOPHER J & SCHULTZ EVA SZAKAL       113,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 312 0400 CONDO 1970    517     113000 
50434423200003140 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        342,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 314 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     342000 
50434423200003150 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        352,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 315 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     352000 
50434423200003160 MONARCH MICHAEL J & MONARCH THOMAS P       332,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 316 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     332000 
50434423200003170 MARTINEZ VANESSA        372,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 317 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     372000 
50434423200003180 GUZMAN WILLIAM        352,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 318 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     352000 
50434423200004010 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        486,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 401 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     486000 
50434423200004020 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        466,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 402 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     466000 
50434423200004030 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        407,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 403 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     407000 
50434423200004040 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        387,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 404 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     387000 
50434423200004050 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        412,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 405 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     412000 
50434423200004060 ALLISON KAREN        392,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 406 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     392000 
50434423200004070 GRISSOM DON J        143,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 407 0400 CONDO 1970    517     143000 
50434423200004080 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        258,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 408 0400 CONDO 1970    861     258000 
50434423200004090 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        143,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 409 0400 CONDO 1970    517     143000 
50434423200004100 ABRAMOWITZ FLORENCE & SIDER MICHAEL &       123,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 410 0400 CONDO 1970    517     123000 
50434423200004110 LORENZO JORGE        372,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 411 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     372000 
50434423200004120 GEAR BRIAN        123,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 412 0400 CONDO 1970    517     123000 
50434423200004140 HORREGO JULIO        352,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 414 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     352000 
50434423200004150 CRUZ AMADO        362,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 415 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     362000 
50434423200004160 RAMOS ROBERTO D        342,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 416 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     342000 
50434423200004170 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        387,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 417 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     387000 
50434423200004180 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        367,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 418 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     367000 
50434423200005010 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        506,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 501 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     506000 
50434423200005020 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        486,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 502 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     486000 
50434423200005030 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        417,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 503 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     417000 
50434423200005040 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        397,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 504 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     397000 
50434423200005050 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        422,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 505 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     422000 
50434423200005060 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        402,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 506 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     402000 
50434423200005070 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        153,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 507 0400 CONDO 1970    517     153000 
50434423200005080 FIALLO JUAN A        268,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 508 0400 CONDO 1970    861     268000 
50434423200005090 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        153,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 509 0400 CONDO 1970    517     153000 
50434423200005100 LEBLANC THOMAS T REV LIVING TRUST LEBLANC THOMAS T TRUSTEE       133,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 510 0400 CONDO 1970    517     133000 
50434423200005110 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        382,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 511 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     382000 
50434423200005120 FRALICKER DEBORAH M        133,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 512 0400 CONDO 1970    517     133000 
50434423200005140 MORRISON DEAN & MORRISON DIANE       362,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 514 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     362000 
50434423200005150 POMORANTZ DANIEL I & POMORANTZ JANET       372,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 515 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     372000 
50434423200005160 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        352,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 516 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     352000 
50434423200005170 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        402,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 517 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     402000 
50434423200005180 BARRIOS ORLANDO        382,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 518 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     382000 
50434423200006010 RAMOS ROBERTO D        526,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 601 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     526000 
50434423200006020 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        506,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 602 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     506000 
50434423200006030 SZETO COLLIN        427,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 603 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     427000 
50434423200006040 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        407,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 604 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     407000 
50434423200006050 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        432,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 605 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     432000 
50434423200006060 URIBE YAIMA        412,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 606 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     412000 
50434423200006070 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        163,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 607 0400 CONDO 1970    517     163000 
50434423200006080 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        278,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 608 0400 CONDO 1970    861     278000 
50434423200006090 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        163,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 609 0400 CONDO 1970    517     163000 
50434423200006100 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        143,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 610 0400 CONDO 1970    517     143000 
50434423200006110 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        392,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 611 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     392000 
50434423200006120 GASKO JOHN        143,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 612 0400 CONDO 1970    517     143000 
50434423200006140 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        372,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 614 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     372000 
50434423200006150 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        382,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 615 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     382000 
50434423200006160 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        362,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 616 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     362000 
50434423200006170 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        417,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 617 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     417000 
50434423200006180 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        397,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 618 0400 CONDO 1970   1234     397000 
50434423200007010 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        584,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 701 0400 CONDO 1970   1596     584000 
50434423200007020 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        515,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 702 0400 CONDO 1970   1318     515000 
50434423200007030 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        504,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 703 0400 CONDO 1970   1596     504000 
50434423200007040 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        465,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 704 0400 CONDO 1970   1318     465000 
50434423200007050 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        524,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 705 0400 CONDO 1970   1596     524000 
50434423200007060 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        338,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 706 0400 CONDO 1970   1004     338000 
50434423200007070 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        559,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 707 0400 CONDO 0   1596     559000 
50434423200007080 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        430,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 708 0400 CONDO 1970   1318     430000 
50434423200007100 WHITEHOUSE 94 LLC        465,000.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442320 2560 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM*** 710 0400 CONDO 1970   1318     465000 
50434426000010090 PALM BEACH COUNTY PREM DIVISION C/O       0.00 0 RIVERS/LAKES                           
50434426000010100 MEGIAS CARLOS TR        1,000.00 1.069 RIVERS/LAKES                           
50434426000010110 PALM BEACH TOWN OF        0.00 0.02 MUNICIPAL           1956 1995 0000 01 3 FIRE PROOF      55750        550         
50434426000010120 3000 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD LLC EDWARDS & ANGELL LLP C/O       300.00 0.0472 VACANT                           
50434426000020041 KLEWICKI GAIL & HILDERBRANDT JUDI       12,320.00 0 RIVERS/LAKES                           
50434426000020042 DONNER WILLIAM I        22,400.00 0 RIVERS/LAKES                           
50434426000020043 KLEWICKI GAIL & HILDERBRANDT JUDI       174.00 0 NON AG                           
50434426010000990 PARLATO JOSEPH V JR        46,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 0990 0400 CONDO 1968   1176      96600 
50434426010001000 HOMAN MICHAEL R & HOMAN MARGARET G       180,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1000 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     180600 
50434426010001010 GRIFFITH EVAN B SR        49,029.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     248850 
50434426010001020 GOODMAN MARK D & GOODMAN BRENDA K       248,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     248850 
50434426010001030 VITALE A STEPHEN & M VILMA M VILMA VITALE       43,685.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1968    980     200550 
50434426010001040 FELEPPA RICHARD A & SUE W        200,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1968    980     200550 
50434426010001050 COURTNEY JAMES R        66,872.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     234150 
50434426010001060 SILLARI CHARLES J        234,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     234150 
50434426010001070 SHIRRIFF FLORIDA TRUST & SHIRRIFF JOHN C TR       195,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1968    980     195300 
50434426010001080 KELLEY MARK        195,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1968    980     195300 
50434426010001090 BONAN MARGARET J        48,529.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     234150 
50434426010001100 CORTES STEVEN J TR &        234,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     234150 
50434426010002010 MARZOCCA THERESA EST        50,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     258850 
50434426010002020 SAPKO JOSEPH R & SAPKO MAUREEN C &       148,861.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     258850 
50434426010002030 JEAN JOSEPH F        34,991.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1968    980     205550 
50434426010002040 YOHANNA MARK A & YOHANNA CARMILLA D       205,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1968    980     205550 
50434426010002050 NATALE ROSE V TR        239,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     239150 
50434426010002060 PARSHALL ANN GRAY V ESTATE PARSHALL WILLIAM W II TR       239,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     239150 
50434426010002070 GOODMAN THERESA        85,818.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1968    980     200300 
50434426010002080 JORDAN CHARLES D & MARY B        200,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1968    980     200300 
50434426010002090 STEGGEMAN KAREN J        239,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     239150 
50434426010002100 CARPENTER STEPHANIE C        239,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     239150 
50434426010002110 MUELLER GERFRIED & MUELLER OKSUN CHONG       334,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     334950 
50434426010002120 DOTOLI FRANKLIN        334,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     334950 
50434426010003010 NOLAN ROSEMARY        268,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     268850 
50434426010003020 GRAY JAMES H & KAREN        268,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     268850 
50434426010003030 HAMMER JOHN J JR & CHU C P MARGARET       210,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1968    980     210550 
50434426010003040 OLIVERI FILADELFIO & OLIVERI ROSALIA       210,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1968    980     210550 
50434426010003050 POLROP H F & POLROP FRANCES O       244,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     244150 
50434426010003060 BLUE CHIP MORTGAGE WHOLESALE LLC CARY ET AL C/O       244,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     244150 
50434426010003070 FISHER DINAIR O        155,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1968    980     205300 
50434426010003080 MITROFANIS CHRIS & MITROFANIS VICKY       205,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1968    980     205300 
50434426010003090 HAMMER JOHN J & CHU MARGARET       244,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     244150 
50434426010003100 RITO LUCIANO &        68,389.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     244150 
50434426010003110 FITZGERALD GEORGE S & JULIANNE TRUST FITZGERALD GEORGE S &       344,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     344950 
50434426010003120 COX THERESE A        344,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     344950 
50434426010004010 FILIPPIDIS MARY        278,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     278850 
50434426010004020 GABELE IRIDE M & SUELI K GABELE ET AL       278,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     278850 
50434426010004030 KASIDONIS PHILIP & ALEXANDRA        215,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1968    980     215550 
50434426010004040 HATZIKYRIAKOS PAUL & HATZIKYRIAKOS VENETIA       215,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1968    980     215550 
50434426010004050 COLLINS BARBARA D        102,937.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     249150 
50434426010004060 GAVRAS MANUEL & IRENE        249,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     249150 
50434426010004070 AGELOPOULOS THEODOROS & AGELOPOULOS KATHRYN       210,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1968    980     210300 
50434426010004080 SILLARI TONY J        210,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1968    980     210300 
50434426010004090 FILIPPIDIS MARY        249,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     249150 
50434426010004100 OSHEA EDWARD        249,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     249150 
50434426010004110 TANNER ANDREW S & TANNER MARGARET S       354,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     354950 
50434426010004120 COLAVITA ANTHONY J & A COLAVITA C/O       354,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     354950 
50434426010005010 GROTSCHEL FRANK W & DOROTHY        288,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     288850 
50434426010005020 KLEWICKI GAIL & HILDEBRANDT JUDI       288,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     288850 
50434426010005030 BRUTSCHIN HELMUT        170,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1968    980     220550 
50434426010005040 PAOLELLA GERALDYNE M        220,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1968    980     220550 
50434426010005050 MCCAIN CHARLES F & JOAN M MCCAIN TRS       254,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     254150 
50434426010005060 PALIKROUSIS ELEFTERIOS & CRIST        254,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     254150 
50434426010005070 GEORGHIOU HELEN        215,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1968    980     215300 
50434426010005080 STRATT STEVEN L & STRATT VACILIK C       215,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1968    980     215300 
50434426010005090 FATTORUSSO HELEN FATTORUSSO JOHN       254,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     254150 
50434426010005100 MEVISSEN JEAN M & JEAN MEVISSEN ET AL TITL HLDRS       71,546.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     254150 
50434426010005110 SACCOMAN RODOLFO H        158,328.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     364950 
50434426010005120 DAMBROSIO ANTHONY & DAMBROSIO MARIAN D       364,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     364950 
50434426010006010 KARPINSKY PHILLIP KARPINSKY ELLEN       248,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     298850 
50434426010006020 BURTON DOUGLAS & BURTON ABBY &       112,407.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     298850 
50434426010006030 SAEGH ROBERT E & SAEGH MARQUERITE       225,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1968    980     225550 
50434426010006040 BRIERLEY ANDREW D        225,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1968    980     225550 
50434426010006050 MCCONNELL TRUDY MCCONNELL TRUDY TR       54,133.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     259150 
50434426010006060 KROPEWNICKI EDWARD & KROPEWNICKI FERN F       116,633.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     259150 
50434426010006070 KOKKORIS MICHAEL        220,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1968    980     220300 
50434426010006080 PALLADINO ALFRED &        220,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1968    980     220300 
50434426010006090 BROCK JANICE B        259,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     259150 
50434426010006100 OSHEA ED        259,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     259150 
50434426010006110 MOSS GERALD &        374,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     374950 
50434426010006120 MITCHELL EDWARD        374,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442601 LA RENAISSANCE CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1968   1176     374950 
50434426020000010 THIRTY TWO HUNDRED INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1977 1987 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      14570        288         
50434426020000010 THIRTY TWO HUNDRED INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1977 1987 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      87260       1584         
50434426020000010 THIRTY TWO HUNDRED INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1977 1987 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      14570        288         
50434426020000010 THIRTY TWO HUNDRED INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1977 1987 0000 01 1 WOOD FRAME      87260       1584         
50434426020011010 WOLINSKY ROSALIE E & WOLINSKY ALAN M       317,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     317100 
50434426020011020 REXROTH MELVIN D & REXROTH SHERRIE C       99,514.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     275100 
50434426020011030 ZAMBITO LEONARD & ZAMBITO FRANCESCA       231,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     231000 
50434426020011040 DELLA PERUTA SALVATORE        156,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     206850 
50434426020012010 CONTARINO A F & JEANNE A M        369,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     369600 
50434426020012020 ARPAD ISIL & OSMAN ARPAD       149,485.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     327600 
50434426020012030 LIM JIMMY U & LIM SUSAN A       404,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     404250 
50434426020012040 FUNT DOLORES & FUNT LORNE       259,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     259350 
50434426020013010 LEVINSON LAWRENCE M TR BURNS & LEVINSON C/O       384,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     384600 
50434426020013020 SERENGETI SANDS LTD        332,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     332600 
50434426020013030 BLOOMFIELD ROBERT L & BLOOMFIELD ANDREA L       359,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     409250 
50434426020013040 SHIPP ROBERT L & ROBERT & LIZA SHIPP TR HLDRS       264,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     264350 
50434426020014010 PUCILLO DOMENICK & JODI        399,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     399600 
50434426020014020 BEDI IRMGARD        337,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     337600 
50434426020014030 CARDIN MAURICE & EVELYN CARDIN EVELYN       144,677.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     414250 
50434426020014040 KYRKOSTAS GUS & JULIE KYRKOSTAS       269,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     269350 
50434426020015010 MARSH MYRA TR        414,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     414600 
50434426020015020 POLAN ARNOLD &        342,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     342600 
50434426020015030 GARDNER LINDA        419,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     419250 
50434426020015040 KARAS SANDRA B KARAS MARTIN S       84,676.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     274350 
50434426020021010 POWELL ALLYN H & MARTHA W        326,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     326550 
50434426020021020 LAMB LUKE R JR & SYLVIA A SYLVIA A LAMB       48,821.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     259350 
50434426020021030 FRIEDMAN BARRY        236,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     236250 
50434426020021040 STROM ROSALYN TR        198,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     198450 
50434426020022010 OCHSHORN LAURA        484,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     484050 
50434426020022020 COBURN PAMELA D &        307,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     307650 
50434426020022030 3200 OCEAN 203 LLC        362,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     362250 
50434426020022040 ROSENBERG DORVIN & ILENE ROSENBERG TR TITL HLDR       73,264.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     250950 
50434426020023010 RUDOLPH JAY & IANNUCCILLO GAIL       228,483.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     499050 
50434426020023020 MORAN BARBARA J        312,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     312650 
50434426020023030 DALTON WILLIAM J        367,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     367250 
50434426020023040 WENZEL SAMUEL B & M JUDITH        255,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     255950 
50434426020024010 JOYCE LOIS M TRUST JOYCE LOIS M TR       514,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     514050 
50434426020024020 ABRAHAMS RICHARD        317,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     317650 
50434426020024030 FHC PALM BEACH INC FREURE HOMES LTD C/O       372,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     372250 
50434426020024040 LEVEY SAMUEL & PEARL LEVEY PEARL       80,112.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     260950 
50434426020025010 RIVLIN HELENE M TRUST RIVLIN HELENE M TR       529,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   1781     529050 
50434426020025020 KOUTROS PETER & KOUTROS MARY P       322,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     322650 
50434426020025030 DISCIULLO JOHN JR & DISCIULLO LAURA       377,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     377250 
50434426020025040 RIZZO ANTONIO &        265,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     265950 
50434426020031010 BLOCK HYMAN & ADELE S BLOCK ADELE S       69,839.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     203700 
50434426020031020 NOLAN TIMOTHY F & BARBARA F        247,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     247800 
50434426020031030 MOSCOVITZ LOUIS A        261,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     261450 
50434426020031040 LA GAMBA ELEANOR        82,165.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     263550 
50434426020032010 BELLO IRVING TR & BELLO BEATRICE S TR       256,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     256200 
50434426020032020 LEE ANTHONY        300,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     300300 
50434426020032030 RADNER SIDNEY H & RADNER HELEN J       192,495.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     313950 
50434426020032040 ERLING THOMAS J THOMAS J ERLING TR TITL HLDR       141,345.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     421050 
50434426020033010 MELAGRANO JOSEPH & MELAGRANO MARGARITE       261,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     261200 
50434426020033020 BARRETT LENORE        305,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     305300 
50434426020033030 MANGINO ROBERT M & MANGINO ANN       318,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     318950 
50434426020033040 SPITALETTA EDWARD D & MARY        431,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     431050 
50434426020034010 BIEDENHARN PAUL J & BARBARA B BIEDENHARN TRS       266,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     266200 
50434426020034020 DERESZ WANDA D        85,774.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     310300 
50434426020034030 ROBARDS ELIZABETH &        202,870.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     323950 
50434426020034040 SMOKLER ALICE V        441,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     441050 
50434426020035010 CHALAL KENNETH        83,535.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     271200 
50434426020035020 DINO CHARLES DINO GENROSE       315,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     315300 
50434426020035030 CARTER CONNIE        328,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     328950 
50434426020035040 FIERSTEIN JERILYNNE        401,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5040 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     451050 
50434426020041010 P B 101 INC        242,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     242550 
50434426020041020 SOLOMON JACK & SOLOMON SYMA       258,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     258300 
50434426020041030 SMALL BARRY &        84,107.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1030 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     227850 
50434426020041040 MAZZORANA JOHN A & DAVINO LYDIA R       260,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 1040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     260400 
50434426020042010 SUN CHIA LEE YAO &        297,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     347550 
50434426020042020 KOPP LARRY S        310,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     310800 
50434426020042030 HERLING IRWIN & HERLING GESINE R       303,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2030 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     353850 
50434426020042040 RAPHAELSON DAVID EST RAPHAELSON ESTHER       312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 2040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     312900 
50434426020043010 HERSHOFF JAY A & HERSHOFF NANCY       352,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     352550 
50434426020043020 VINE JOSEPH & EDITH VINE EDITH       85,755.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     315800 
50434426020043030 SIMONS ALAN & SIMONS ANNETTE       358,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3030 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     358850 
50434426020043040 BENJAMIN JACK        322,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 3040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     322900 
50434426020044010 GORDON RICHARD S &        357,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     357550 
50434426020044020 BOSNIAK MORTON A & BOSNIAK TOMMIE H       270,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     320800 
50434426020044030 BRANDOW MANUEL & RENEE        363,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4030 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     363850 
50434426020044040 AHLMANN LUCILLE C MELISSA RIPPE C/O       332,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 4040 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     332900 
50434426020045010 ZANGER MARILYN        86,458.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 0010 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     362550 
50434426020045020 EPSTEIN HAROLD & EPSTEIN SYLVIA       212,069.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5020 0400 CONDO 1977   1366     325800 
50434426020045030 WIESELMAN LEONARD & WIESELMAN CLEMENCE       318,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) 5030 0400 CONDO 1977   1719     368850 
50434426020045040 WIESELMAN LEONARD & WIESELMAN CLEMENCE       342,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442602 3200 CONDO (AKA-PATRICIANS) D 504 0400 CONDO 1977   1476     342900 
50434426030011010 LEED STEVEN B & LEED PAULA B       464,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     464100 
50434426030011020 WERNER EUNICE TR        269,729.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     567000 
50434426030011030 WEINSTEIN ROBERT &        517,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     567000 
50434426030011040 KOVEN DOROTHY FAMILY TRUST KOVEN JACK TR       425,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     425250 
50434426030011050 COLE DEBRA F        296,888.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     393750 
50434426030011060 DUNN NORMA S NORMA S DUNN ET AL TR HLDRS       148,683.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     425250 
50434426030011070 HOCHMAN SONIA & MARK HOCHMAN       332,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     332850 
50434426030011080 BAROWSKY MISCHA D & NORMA J        332,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     332850 
50434426030011090 BUCHEIT FLOYD & BUCHEIT ROSWITHA       412,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     412650 
50434426030011100 GLASSMAN ADELE GLASSMAN GARY       417,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     417900 
50434426030012010 HSU REBECCA & HSU JOHN       489,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     489100 
50434426030012020 SEVEN 41479 ALBERTA LTD        617,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     617000 
50434426030012030 PALTROW FRAN T        617,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     617000 
50434426030012040 DRAPER RICHARD D        279,489.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     450250 
50434426030012050 KENT LISA        140,001.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     418750 
50434426030012060 PEARL BEATRICE A EST HOWARD L PEARL C/O       450,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     450250 
50434426030012070 ATTAR ROBERT & ATTAR ROSEANN       357,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     357850 
50434426030012080 STERMER NATHAN        357,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     357850 
50434426030012090 STEINBERG SHIRLEY TRUST STEINBERG SHIRLEY TR       437,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     437650 
50434426030012100 MERKIN MARCIA MERKIN MARCIA TR       140,001.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     442900 
50434426030013010 GREER RICHARD K & JARJOURA GEORGES       516,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     516600 
50434426030013020 BILLHARTZ WARREN & MARCIA A        672,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     672000 
50434426030013030 KRANTZ JACQUELINE        271,398.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     672000 
50434426030013040 LENAHAN HELEN D        477,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     477750 
50434426030013050 GROSSMAN GEORGE F & GROSSMAN BARBARA       446,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     446250 
50434426030013060 ANDRESON NICHOLAS J TR & ANDRESON JANET TR       477,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     477750 
50434426030013070 SHANIK LEO & BELLE E SHANIK BELLE E       124,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     385350 
50434426030013080 PEARSON LAWRENCE J & PEARSON SARI       385,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     385350 
50434426030013090 ABOFF HERBERT S        465,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     465150 
50434426030013100 AMBLER BETH TRUST        470,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     470400 
50434426030014010 MICHAILIDIS STEVE & MICHAILIDIS ANNA       526,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     526600 
50434426030014020 FUGGER ALEXANDRA        692,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     692000 
50434426030014030 RIZZA ANTHONY V        692,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     692000 
50434426030014040 EASTERLIN DONALD J III & EASTERLIN DONNA B       487,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     487750 
50434426030014050 LONG JOHN F JR        456,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     456250 
50434426030014060 GOLDMACHER DALE        487,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     487750 
50434426030014070 MILLER EILEEN        395,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     395350 
50434426030014080 COHEN SUSAN        309,470.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     395350 
50434426030014090 MEISLER IRWIN & MEISLER AMY       475,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     475150 
50434426030014100 REISENFELD BETTY G REISENFELD BETTY G TR       430,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     480400 
50434426030015010 CRISTELLO EDWARD H & JO ANN CRISTELLO JO ANN       151,019.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     536600 
50434426030015020 GOPEN ALLEN M & GLORIA R GOPEN GLORIA R       273,734.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     712000 
50434426030015030 HASKELL SHEILA & HASKELL ROBERT       712,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     712000 
50434426030015040 LEFNAER BJORN GUNNAR BARBARA SLOAN C/O       368,136.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     497750 
50434426030015050 GAYLIN BETTY S        466,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     466250 
50434426030015060 WILLIAMS WESLEY T        497,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     497750 
50434426030015070 BLASER FAMILY LLC MARIA BLASER C/O       405,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     405350 
50434426030015080 KLYDE LYNNE        405,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     405350 
50434426030015090 KAMEN MICHAEL A        152,189.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     485150 
50434426030015100 LAZZARA DEANNA        440,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     490400 
50434426030021010 HEARNE STEVEN & HEARNE LAURA       401,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     401100 
50434426030021020 SERETAN CYNTHIA N        463,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     463050 
50434426030021030 AQUA SHELL LLC        463,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     463050 
50434426030021040 GIOVINGO CAROLE        383,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     383250 
50434426030021050 MURRAY JAMES R & MURRAY CARIDAD       369,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     369600 
50434426030021060 HARRIS MARTIN C HARRIS MARTIN C TR       147,513.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     400050 
50434426030021070 SURUCCI ARMINIO & SURUCCI NARCISA       345,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     345450 
50434426030021080 SZEKELY GABOR & SZEKELY EVA V       345,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     345450 
50434426030021090 KRUMHOLZ DIANE        227,271.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     387450 
50434426030021100 GELEZINSKY DAVID M &        312,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     362250 
50434426030022010 PARL CHARLES PARL JACK       426,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     426100 
50434426030022020 SCHERR RICHARD A        513,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     513050 
50434426030022030 STANLEY MICHAEL C        402,368.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     513050 
50434426030022040 TEGANO ROSEMARY Z & TEGANO JOHN M       128,047.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     408250 
50434426030022050 KHEIL-KERR EMILE        286,014.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     394600 
50434426030022060 ROIFF UNIT 206 DORCHESTER LLC C/O HEATH PROPERTIES       425,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     425050 
50434426030022070 WINDSOR INVESTMENT GROUP LP        370,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     370450 
50434426030022080 STERMER SAUL & STERMER CZARNA       370,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     370450 
50434426030022090 GLATZ ATTILA & GLATZ MARLON       412,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     412450 
50434426030022100 DAVERSA RANIERO &        387,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     387250 
50434426030023010 MOKOTOFF MALCOLM & STACEY        453,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     453600 
50434426030023020 WACHTENHEIM POLLY POLLY WACHTENHEIM ET AL TR HLDRS       271,398.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     568050 
50434426030023030 BROOKS LAUREN        518,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     568050 
50434426030023040 MURRAY MADELINE D        435,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     435750 
50434426030023050 MARCH ROBERT & MARCH JOAN       422,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     422100 
50434426030023060 SCANGAS PENELOPE TR        452,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     452550 
50434426030023070 KERSHNER BRUCE S        124,139.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     397950 
50434426030023080 MARTIN MARILYN        123,639.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     397950 
50434426030023090 FESSAGUET ROGER A & FESSAGUET MIRIAM S       266,973.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     439950 
50434426030023100 NATHAN NAOMI R        414,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     414750 
50434426030024010 GREER BRUCE G & GREER VICTORIA S       148,938.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     463600 
50434426030024020 PAUL HOWARD & PAUL ISOBEL       339,192.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     588050 
50434426030024030 JOSELOW SAMUEL        588,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     588050 
50434426030024040 SHIKAR DENNIS S & SHIKAR CONNIE       445,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     445750 
50434426030024050 GORDY DIANE D        432,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     432100 
50434426030024060 SCANGAS PAMELA K        462,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     462550 
50434426030024070 JOONDEPH NORMAN & MARCIA        407,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     407950 
50434426030024080 ALTSCHULER BERNARD M & DORIS        407,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     407950 
50434426030024090 AXELROD ZELLA        449,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     449950 
50434426030024100 LEPES LILLIAN        142,338.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     424750 
50434426030025010 STILLMAN ROY        473,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     473600 
50434426030025020 MILLER RICHARD & MILLER LOIS P       608,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     608050 
50434426030025030 KATZ MIRIAM        273,234.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1979   1900     608050 
50434426030025040 SAFRAN MADELINE        392,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1979   1515     455750 
50434426030025050 MUSCAT REALTY TRUST & WILLIS SUSAN J TR       442,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1979   1621     442100 
50434426030025060 FRANKEL CHESTER L & IDALINE P        472,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     472550 
50434426030025070 COLEMAN EDWARD H & COLEMAN NATALIE       301,237.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     417950 
50434426030025080 MOSS SANDRA M        417,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     417950 
50434426030025090 CHURCHILL DEBRA        459,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1979   1748     459950 
50434426030025100 MILLER RICHARD & LOIS P        434,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442603 DORCHESTER OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1979   1640     434750 
50434426040011010 LIVINGSTON LEE        416,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     416850 
50434426040011020 GOODSTEIN FLA LLC        382,337.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     675150 
50434426040011030 LEIBOW FRANKLIN & LEIBOW HILTON MARITAL TRUST       675,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     675150 
50434426040011040 LOFFREDO RICHARD &        366,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     416850 
50434426040011050 SAPEGA CATHERINE CATHERINE SAPEGA TR TITL HLDR       259,466.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     493500 
50434426040011060 GOLDEN ARLEEN & GOLDEN TERRY D       340,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     340200 
50434426040011070 WOLSER MARION R        99,586.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     340200 
50434426040011080 SEGEL IRA M & SEGEL LOIS       395,117.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     493500 
50434426040012010 ZESKIND BETTY TRUST ZESKIND H J TR &       469,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     469350 
50434426040012020 PERRY BERNARD L        269,091.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     780150 
50434426040012030 HUT PETER A & HUT SUSAN J       730,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     780150 
50434426040012040 RAMONDETTA JOSEPHINE P RAMONDETTA JOSEPHINE P TR       141,693.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     469350 
50434426040012050 HOLTZMAN DAVID B TR &        598,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     598500 
50434426040012060 MOCK DAVID F        392,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     392700 
50434426040012070 SELIGMAN EDWARD & RUTH SELIGMAN RUTH       392,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     392700 
50434426040012080 BALABAN SUSAN W        598,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     598500 
50434426040013010 COMISKY MARVIN        479,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     479350 
50434426040013020 NASH ELLEN C        800,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     800150 
50434426040013030 LECHTER ABELARDO & LYNNE K        800,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     800150 
50434426040013040 HOLT ALLAN M &        479,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     479350 
50434426040013050 MILLER GLORIA        293,153.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     608500 
50434426040013060 HOMER JUDITH A TR & HOMER RICHARD S TR       397,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     397700 
50434426040013070 BELLE R NEWMAN REV TRUST        397,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     397700 
50434426040013080 FREEDMAN FAMILY LIVING TRUST & FREEDMAN ARTHUR N TR       608,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     608500 
50434426040014010 SCHILLER LESLIE L ET AL        146,504.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     489350 
50434426040014020 RAYTCHEVA ANNA V TRUST RAYTCHEVA ANNA V TRUSTEE &       820,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     820150 
50434426040014030 SACKEL SOL & LILLIAN SACKEL LILLIAN       273,902.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     820150 
50434426040014040 GREEN BERT &        146,504.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     489350 
50434426040014050 VELIKA LLC GEORGE KOULMENTAS C/O       618,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     618500 
50434426040014060 VAN DE WOESTIJNE HERMAN G        402,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     402700 
50434426040014070 YATVIN ANNETTE        106,803.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     402700 
50434426040014080 EPSTEIN LOUIS        618,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     618500 
50434426040015010 SPECKER ANITA EST MICHAEL MARKOVITZ C/O       448,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     499350 
50434426040015020 LIEB JOSEPH        840,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     840150 
50434426040015030 SELIGMAN LEONARD & MARILYN SELIGMAN MARILYN       276,309.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     840150 
50434426040015040 RIEDERMAN FRIDA RIEDERMAN FRIDA TR       438,959.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     499350 
50434426040015050 BIGELOW EUNICE J        628,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     628500 
50434426040015060 BERBRIER PAMELA        407,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     407700 
50434426040015070 LIFSHITZ RUTH ET AL        407,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     407700 
50434426040015080 FELDMAN MARK & FELDMAN NINA       578,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     628500 
50434426040021010 RADLAUER MILDRED        139,288.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     437850 
50434426040021020 WURTZEL LEO A & PATRICIA R WURTZEL PATRICIA R       241,419.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     696150 
50434426040021030 KULE DAVID & KULE GERALDINE       696,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     696150 
50434426040021040 BONOMO VINCENT A BONOMO KATHERINE       387,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     437850 
50434426040021050 SAROLA FRANK A & EDITH S EDITH S SAROLA       256,354.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     514500 
50434426040021070 FINKLE H DAVID TR        319,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     319200 
50434426040021080 SILVERMAN LEONARD & ELAINE C SILVERMAN ELAINE C       253,048.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     514500 
50434426040022010 CRACE JOSEPH B & CRACE MICHELE G       440,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     490350 
50434426040022020 SOUTH OCEAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP        801,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     801150 
50434426040022030 STROGOFF DIANE F        269,091.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     801150 
50434426040022040 SHAPIRO MADELINE        141,693.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     490350 
50434426040022050 LERMAN MILES & LERMAN ROSALIE C       534,664.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     619500 
50434426040022060 GIBSON JUDITH        132,006.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     371700 
50434426040022070 TUCCI GERARD M & TUCCI SUSAN P       371,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     371700 
50434426040022080 SANCHEZ JEAN PIERRE &        619,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     619500 
50434426040023010 RITCHIE ETHEL        500,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     500350 
50434426040023020 CHITAYAT CLAIRE L TR        821,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     821150 
50434426040023030 BRACHMAN MEROM IRREV TRUST        821,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     821150 
50434426040023040 GLATTER LYNNE CATHERINE        143,599.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     500350 
50434426040023050 SIMON STANLEY &        629,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     629500 
50434426040023060 EISNER ROBERT G        266,147.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     376700 
50434426040023070 ALLEN ROBERT K & ALLEN DOROTHY L       376,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     376700 
50434426040023080 ENGLE LEONARD        629,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     629500 
50434426040024010 GILLON ADAM 1997 TRUST GILLON ADAM TR       510,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     510350 
50434426040024020 BOOKSTEIN MARTIN & PEARL        841,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     841150 
50434426040024030 POST JENNIFER        841,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     841150 
50434426040024040 BONFIELD HOLDING CO INC A H BLUM-100 GARRETT BLDG C/O       510,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     510350 
50434426040024050 KELLY RICHARD J        589,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     639500 
50434426040024060 ROTH HOWARD & ROTH MURIEL       326,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     381700 
50434426040024070 WARD JACOB & HILDA        381,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     381700 
50434426040024080 ACKERMAN ALAN T & SHARYL        639,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     639500 
50434426040025010 ANDRON ANDREW C &        520,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     520350 
50434426040025020 ELEANOR SMOLER & HARRIS BANK ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       861,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     861150 
50434426040025030 MORGENSTERN BARBARA L TRUST MORGENSTERN BARBARA L TRUSTEE       861,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1981   2072     861150 
50434426040025040 KROLL LARRY & KROLL SANDRA       520,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1981   1902     520350 
50434426040025050 SCHADER BYRON K        538,024.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     649500 
50434426040025060 WEISS ELAINE S TR        386,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     386700 
50434426040025070 LAMPERT HANNAH TRUST EST TRUDY BIENENFELD TRUSTEE C/O       386,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1981   1436     386700 
50434426040025080 SADEK CONSTANCE TR SADEK LAUREN TR       649,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442604 MERIDIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1981   2196     649500 
50434426050011010 MARR FL HLDG INC        637,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     637350 
50434426050011020 FURMANSKY LOUIS & FURMANSKY SHIRLEY       519,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     519750 
50434426050011030 WALLACK STEPHEN L & WALLACK VIRGINIA E       807,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     807450 
50434426050011040 VOTIS GEORGE        657,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     657300 
50434426050011050 TUNICK RICHARD D & TUNICK CAROLE S       807,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     807450 
50434426050011060 BLOOM BERNARD        498,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     498750 
50434426050011070 FORMAN LIVIA        315,809.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     637350 
50434426050012010 PERL NORMAN        436,187.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     773850 
50434426050012020 TIERNAN CHARLES & TIERNAN MARY       572,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     572250 
50434426050012030 VOSBIKIAN PETER S &        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     912450 
50434426050012040 CHAKERES PAULINE N        711,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     762300 
50434426050012050 POST JENNIFER        912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     912450 
50434426050012060 PARRY GRACE G PARRY GRACE G TR       276,741.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     551250 
50434426050012070 SIEGAL ANNETTE        692,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     742350 
50434426050013010 SANDFORD GLORIA SANDFORD GLORIA TRUST       557,369.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     788850 
50434426050013020 DIROCCO AURELIO &        587,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     587250 
50434426050013030 CARSON RESOURCES LTD NYC PARK AVENUE BRANCH C/O       937,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     937450 
50434426050013040 FISHER CONRAD & CHARLES & ELIZABETH FISHER ET ALTR HLDRS       737,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     787300 
50434426050013050 LARNER SARA L        937,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     937450 
50434426050013060 FEINER ROBERT & LOUISE        566,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     566250 
50434426050013070 GOLDENBERG MARTIN & GOLDENBERG CAROL       757,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     757350 
50434426050014010 FISCHMAN BRUCE A &        803,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     803850 
50434426050014020 BAUM MORTON J & BAUM ELISSA K       508,936.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     602250 
50434426050014030 BRUNO ANGELA ANGELA BRUNO TR TITL HLDR       876,484.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     962450 
50434426050014040 KAZI JEAN        394,112.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     812300 
50434426050014050 VILLANI BENNY R        962,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     962450 
50434426050014060 GIBBS CAPITAL LTD        581,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     581250 
50434426050014070 BERMAN CECILE        436,187.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     772350 
50434426050015010 LUSTBADER MARVIN & LUSTBADER MARILYN       818,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     818850 
50434426050015020 KATZ DEANNA E        519,809.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     617250 
50434426050015030 GOLDBERG HELENE N GOLDBERG HELENE NAGIN       523,841.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     987450 
50434426050015040 BENNETT J HAROLD & BELLE        837,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     837300 
50434426050015050 SHIPON JACOB & SHIPON JUDITH       821,395.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     987450 
50434426050015060 BERGER GAIL C        287,760.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     596250 
50434426050015070 MARSH ELAINE MARSH BURTON       787,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     787350 
50434426050021010 HEYMAN BRUCE M & ESSIG ELLEN S       472,210.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     637350 
50434426050021020 COLANGELO STEVEN & COLANGELO JANIS       477,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     477750 
50434426050021030 FRIEDMAN MURRAY & EVELYN        807,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     807450 
50434426050021040 MARTINGALE HOLDINGS US INC        657,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     657300 
50434426050021050 SERR LINDA KARMA CLOTHING COMPANY LIMITED C/O       807,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     807450 
50434426050021060 HAZEL WILLIAM A JR &        519,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     519750 
50434426050022010 LIFSON RITA LIFSON BURTON S       657,110.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     742350 
50434426050022020 PICK MARIE T & ANN B PICK       277,241.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     530250 
50434426050022030 COOPER DAVID & COOPER YVONNE       912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     912450 
50434426050022040 LAZZARA DEANNA M        762,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     762300 
50434426050022050 KUBY PHYLLIS KUBY PHYLLIS TR       539,702.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     912450 
50434426050022060 PACKER SIDNEY & ELEANOR PACKER ELEANOR       277,241.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     572250 
50434426050022070 ELLIEN ALGERNON M & ISABEL        773,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     773850 
50434426050023010 ROSS CAROLYN A ROSS ELLIOT B TR       536,120.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     757350 
50434426050023020 JACOBSON GLADYS JACOBSON-HARDY MICHAEL B       362,797.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     535250 
50434426050023030 BERKOWITZ ROGER S & ELLEN SYKES C/O       937,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     937450 
50434426050023040 SKLAR BERNICE K SKLAR BERNICE K TR       390,107.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     787300 
50434426050023050 MARKS LANA J        512,745.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     937450 
50434426050023060 GHELBER SORIN        433,212.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     587250 
50434426050023070 CHARNESS MARK TRS ET AL        788,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     788850 
50434426050024010 KATZ HYMAN I        422,309.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     772350 
50434426050024020 WOLFMAN RICHARD S WOLFMAN RICHARD S TR       489,720.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     540250 
50434426050024030 EAGLE EPPIE        962,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     962450 
50434426050024040 COHEN PHILLIP L & BARBARA C        812,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     812300 
50434426050024050 ROSS ANNE & ANNE ROSS ET AL TRUST TITL HLDRS       912,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     962450 
50434426050024060 YEONAS STEPHEN G & YEONAS THELMA S       602,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     602250 
50434426050024070 SILVERI JACQUELINE M        803,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     803850 
50434426050025010 JACOBS SHIRLEY        446,705.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     787350 
50434426050025020 WINOKER SIDNEY & IRMA        545,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     545250 
50434426050025030 WALLACE DONALD B TR WALLACE BARBARA J TRS       987,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     987450 
50434426050025040 FIVE BEACH BA LLC GAEL BERIRO PA C/O       837,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1982   2173     837300 
50434426050025050 COHEN ARNA K ARNA K COHEN TRUST       523,841.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1982   2695     987450 
50434426050025060 KATZ SUSAN K PETER KATZ C/O       617,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1982   2220     617250 
50434426050025070 JACOBY HELENE        439,693.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1982   2533     818850 
50434426050030010 FIVE BEACH BA LLC GAEL BERIRO PA C/O       30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426050030020 FISHER EDITH A & CONRAD W FISHER       30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426050030030 KATZ HYMAN I        30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426050030040 CARSON RESOURCES LTD NYC PARK AVENUE BRANCH C/O       30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426050030050 WALLACE DONALD B TR WALLACE BARBARA J TRS       30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426050030060 GOLDBERG HELENE N GOLDBERG HELENE NAGIN       30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426050030070 VOSBIKIAN PETER S &        30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426050030080 LUSTBADER MARVIN        30,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442605 CARLTON PLACE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1982      0      30450 
50434426060000000 PALM BEACH RES % BERKLEY MGMT        3,108,500.00 1 TIMESHARE                   5043442606 PALM BCH RESORT & BCH CLB CONDO  0420 TIMESHARE 1982      0    3108500 
50434426070011010 TEVEROW JOSHUA        656,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     706650 
50434426070011020 ADALMAN CLAIRE        230,937.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     571200 
50434426070011030 GOLDSTEIN LEE D & IDA S IDA S GOLDSTEIN       248,022.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     891450 
50434426070012020 BUDKER JOSEPH        411,067.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     581200 
50434426070012030 AUGERI ANN F AUGERI ANN F TR       396,651.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     909350 
50434426070013010 WOGALTER HARRY & BARBARA WOGALTER BARBARA       726,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     726650 
50434426070013020 VIDOR SOLOMON B        591,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     591200 
50434426070013030 PALOKA ZEF        929,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     929350 
50434426070014020 T R D B LIVING TRUST        432,816.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     601200 
50434426070014030 TAGARIS NICHOLAS        949,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     949350 
50434426070015010 JOHRENDT BONNIE J        746,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     746650 
50434426070015020 GEORGAS WILLIAM        611,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     611200 
50434426070015030 ELLENBOGEN JANE K JANE ELLENBOGEN TR HLDR       432,213.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     969350 
50434426070016020 COWEN SHIRLEY F        317,648.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     644700 
50434426070016030 KRAMER DANIEL & KRAMER GINA       1,036,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877    1036350 
50434426070021010 ROPPOLO CARL        685,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     685650 
50434426070021020 MATZNER RONALD & MATZNER BARBARA       365,396.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     549150 
50434426070021030 CAVALLINO FRANK J SR        891,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     891450 
50434426070022020 DUBIN LAWRENCE M TR        570,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     570150 
50434426070022030 ROSS MARION R        248,022.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     901450 
50434426070023010 SIDEWATER STEVEN        1,161,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1984   5067    1211700 
50434426070023030 DION PETER & DION DIANA       922,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     922450 
50434426070024020 SHULGASSER LUBA        273,154.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     601150 
50434426070024030 PARVEN ALVIN S &        598,104.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     922450 
50434426070025010 FORD JOSEPH A SR &        725,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     725650 
50434426070025020 JACOBSON GERALD &        561,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     611150 
50434426070025030 GOLDBERG ALBERT S GOLDBERG ALBERT S TR       420,526.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     942450 
50434426070026020 VILIAN DOROTHEA M TR        317,648.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     643650 
50434426070026030 FALK BEN S & FINCH GAYLE D       975,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     975450 
50434426070031010 VEDERMAN HERBERT T        656,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     706650 
50434426070031020 GRACE M STEPHEN & GRACE DARLENE W       412,155.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     571200 
50434426070031030 TEDESCHI JOHN M & TEDESCHI GERALDINE       839,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     889350 
50434426070032020 MOYSE CHARLOTTE        581,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     581200 
50434426070032030 MESIROW FLORIDA CONDOMINIUM LAND TRUST RICHARD MESIROW C/O       909,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     909350 
50434426070033010 HANSIG REALTY TRUST LP        746,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     746650 
50434426070033020 LAVERTY VIRGINIA V LAVERTY VIRGINIA V TR       354,956.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     591200 
50434426070033030 HOFFMAN TARYN C HOFFMAN TARYN C TR       879,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     929350 
50434426070034020 DAY JOSEF TR & DAY RUTH TR       273,654.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     601200 
50434426070034030 FIELD LOIS S FIELD LOIS S TR       420,526.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     949350 
50434426070035010 GINSBERG STANTON & NORA        786,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1984   2570     786650 
50434426070035020 KRUMHOLZ MERA        287,227.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     611200 
50434426070035030 ABRAMS ARTHUR L & RENA E ABRAMS RENA E       432,213.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877     969350 
50434426070036020 MAJIDZADEH KAMRAN & MAJIDZADEH FARAH B       644,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1984   2497     644700 
50434426070036030 BEAUDOIN JOHN T & JOHN T BEAUDOIN TR TITL HLDR       461,430.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442607 THIRTY ONE TWENTY CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1984   2877    1036350 
50434426080012010 PERRIN DONALD M & SANDRA J        917,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     917700 
50434426080012020 BERREZOUG MOHAMED & BERREZOUG ANNIE       645,387.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1707300 
50434426080012030 HAHN GINGER        1,298,404.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1602300 
50434426080012040 BLOCK HENRY & GILDA        812,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     812700 
50434426080012050 SPIEGEL PAULA S        1,186,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1186500 
50434426080012060 PLAFSKY NATHAN & ROBERT PLAFSKY C/O       1,136,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1186500 
50434426080013010 ROSENBERG NORTON A        381,926.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     927700 
50434426080013020 CHASANOF MICHAEL J &        1,732,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1732300 
50434426080013030 FOXMAN NORTON & NORTON FOXMAN TR TITL HLDR       1,627,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1627300 
50434426080013040 GAGLIOTI DINO        817,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     817700 
50434426080013050 BRINKLEY JAMES W        1,006,780.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1201500 
50434426080013060 GOODMAN MILDRED R        536,448.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1201500 
50434426080014010 BOTVIN BURTON & CAROLYN BOTVIN CAROLYN       394,112.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     937700 
50434426080014020 ROSENBLOOM RICHARD ET AL TR        1,757,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1757300 
50434426080014030 DAVIS HARRIET P        0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1652300 
50434426080014040 MARTORANA FRANK & MARTORANA ANTOINETTE       822,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     822700 
50434426080014050 ROMERO CALIXTO & BANCO DE CREDITO C/O       1,216,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1216500 
50434426080014060 NILOFF P H & MADELAINE NILOFF MADELAINE       548,778.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1216500 
50434426080015010 ROMERO YOLE PAOLETTI        947,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     947700 
50434426080015020 DENHOLTZ JACK W & SHIRLEY DENHOLTZ SHIRLEY       647,435.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1782300 
50434426080015030 PSATY MILTON &        1,331,027.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1677300 
50434426080015040 GOLBER CONSTANCE K GOLBER CONSTANCE K TR       703,806.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     827700 
50434426080015050 DE ROMERO YOLE PAOLETTI BANCO CREDITO DEL PERU   C/O       1,231,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1231500 
50434426080015060 HOFFMAN GENE R & HOFFMAN ALELE H       914,544.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1231500 
50434426080016010 SHAPIRO NORMA SHAPIRO NORMA TR       417,486.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     957700 
50434426080016020 BERLINER HAROLD & JUDITH M BERLINER JUDITH M       659,766.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1807300 
50434426080016030 GROBER JOAN F        617,838.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1702300 
50434426080016040 BAIERL WILLIAM R & CAROLE A        832,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     832700 
50434426080016050 SIEGAL E MARK TR        1,246,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1246500 
50434426080016060 HAYMON MONTE R & HAYMON JANE E       1,196,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1246500 
50434426080017010 BAROCAS MARTIN & HARRIET        967,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     967700 
50434426080017020 SZUCH CLYDE A & SZUCH ROSALIE W       1,374,524.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1832300 
50434426080017030 RIZZA JOSEPH R & NIVES M        1,727,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1727300 
50434426080017040 BARMISH MARTON & RHODA        837,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     837700 
50434426080017050 SHERMAN DONALD J & SHERMAN CAROLE B       1,261,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1261500 
50434426080017060 KAMINSKY GERALD P        1,261,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1261500 
50434426080022010 KAPLAN ELEANOR M        339,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     760200 
50434426080022020 WEISS MICHAEL A RES TRUST AGREE WEISS MICHAEL A TR       1,602,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1602300 
50434426080022030 CURRAN EILEEN C ET AL TR        628,271.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1707300 
50434426080022040 FRIEDMAN ANITA TR        339,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     917700 
50434426080022050 GOLD CHARLOTTE        803,627.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1186500 
50434426080022060 ZISES JANE K        556,565.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1081500 
50434426080023010 RUBINSTEIN ETHEL RUBINSTEIN ETHEL TR       351,539.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     770200 
50434426080023020 KOTCHER JULES & JILL STERN TR TITL HLDR       1,298,404.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1622300 
50434426080023030 REYNOLDS JANET M        1,732,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1732300 
50434426080023040 HEYMAN NORMAN M & EDITH K        925,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     925200 
50434426080023050 WEISS ARNOLD M &        1,201,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1201500 
50434426080023060 STEINBERG MICHAEL &        562,751.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1094000 
50434426080024010 HENDLER WILLIAM & ROSALYN HENDLER ROSALYN       363,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     780200 
50434426080024020 SANTOMERO VINCENT & SANTOMERO LAURETTA       1,642,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1642300 
50434426080024030 ADLER DOROTHY        634,603.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1757300 
50434426080024040 GROFFMAN LESLIE & KAREN GROFFMAN KAREN       363,725.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     932700 
50434426080024050 SANDSON BERNARD & SANDSON BEATRICE       1,216,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1216500 
50434426080024060 ELLNER MARTIN & ELLNER RHODA       1,056,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1106500 
50434426080025010 MANN LILLIAN E TR KAPLAN SUSAN C/O       790,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     790200 
50434426080025020 COOK MARY ANNE        1,662,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1662300 
50434426080025030 COOK MARY ANNE        1,782,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1782300 
50434426080025040 LEVY NANCY E        940,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     940200 
50434426080025050 SAMARAS JANET        835,749.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1231500 
50434426080025060 KATZ NATHAN & SIMA        1,119,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1119000 
50434426080026010 GOALD HAROLD J        800,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     800200 
50434426080026020 LEVIN GILBERT V & LEVIN KAREN       1,682,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1682300 
50434426080026030 RENCLAVE CORP        1,807,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1807300 
50434426080026040 LEVY NANCY E        947,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     947700 
50434426080026050 LAMPERT CONSTANCE W        847,124.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1246500 
50434426080026060 KORN SHELDON        797,102.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1131500 
50434426080027010 WECHSLER I A & JACQUELIN G WECHSLER JACQUELIN G       398,787.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     810200 
50434426080027020 COOPER JOSEPH D        694,511.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1702300 
50434426080027030 KROIZ HARVEY E & BARBARA        1,832,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1832300 
50434426080027040 GALLO VICTOR A & SONG C        955,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1985   2350     955200 
50434426080027050 ZABAN ERWIN & JUDY        1,261,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1261500 
50434426080027060 MILLER STANLEY T & STANLEY T MILLER TRUST       965,580.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442608 ENCLAVE OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1985   2950    1144000 
50434426090000010 MOTZNO SELMA        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000020 RIESE ANITA TERRY GEBBIA C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000030 DREW HOWARD & DREW INA       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000040 HILLTIDE INVESTMENTS LIMITED KAREN HOLT VISTRA TRUST CO  JERSEY C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000050 ZETLIN LEV & EVE        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0500 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000060 CYKER MARVIN M & CYKER JENNY       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000070 CANDEE SYLVIA P TRUST CANDEE SYLVIA P TR       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000080 VEKA PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE OFF C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000090 KATZ MAURICE N & LYNN F KATZ & REUBEN BERGMAN TRS       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000100 EL LEN HOLDINGS LTD        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000110 FINEBERG SANDRA & FINEBERG GERALD S       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000120 KLEBANOFF MICHAEL & ANGELICA        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000130 DORFRIED ULC BURNETT DUCKWORTH & PALMER C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000140 WORLD PRINCESS CORP B RAMSAY C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000150 TICK PHYLLIS TRUST TICK PHYLLIS TRUSTEE &       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000160 KLEIN ARTHUR S KLEIN ELEANOR H       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000170 CRANDALL LOUISE WEST END FINANCIAL C/O       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000180 DEBORAH ARONSON PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0180 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000190 YOUNG PHYLLIS L        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0190 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000200 ANTON IRVING & MADELINE        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0200 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000210 MARTIN PAUL J JR        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0210 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000220 KOSSAR BERNARD R & CAROL        51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0220 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090000230 KALINER HOWARD & LEE KALINER TRS       51,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0230 0400 CONDO 1985      0      51450 
50434426090011010 SCHNEIDER RUTH L        605,216.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     749700 
50434426090011020 1358127 ONTARIO LIMITED        769,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     769650 
50434426090011030 DREAMFIELD HOLDING LTD        1,243,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1243200 
50434426090011040 KAMHI JAK V & AMI BUSINESS CENTER MRS INGE ROTHENBERG       764,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     764400 
50434426090011050 COOK MAUDE        493,271.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     893550 
50434426090011060 LEVIEN 2000 INVESTMENTS LTD        701,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     701400 
50434426090011070 WOLFSON HAROLD WOLFSON HAROLD TR       595,063.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     711900 
50434426090012010 HOWARD BERNARD & IRMA IRMA HOWARD       486,423.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     774700 
50434426090012020 LANGEVELD N J & LANGEVELD WILHELMINA E       769,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     819650 
50434426090012030 BELL HAROLD K & BARBARA BELL BARBARA       664,254.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1293200 
50434426090012040 ABEND CAROL L        814,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     814400 
50434426090012050 FIDET LTD RICK PETERSON P A C/O       918,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     918550 
50434426090012060 CALIFANO FRANK &        726,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     726400 
50434426090012070 KRONER GENE & KRONER KAREN       736,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     736900 
50434426090013010 WEISS BARRY & WEISS GAIL       749,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     799700 
50434426090013020 CUSHMAN FREDERICA M TRUST CUSHMAN FREDERICA M TR       869,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     869650 
50434426090013030 BEHRAKIS GEORGE D & MARGO        1,343,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1343200 
50434426090013040 TESIERO J A JR & TESIERO ELIZABETH N       864,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     864400 
50434426090013050 ROBUSTELLI DOMINICK & ELAINE C ROBUSTELLI ELAINE C       493,029.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     943550 
50434426090013060 MERSENTES K ALEXIS        751,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     751400 
50434426090013070 DORFMAN LAURA TR        761,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     761900 
50434426090014010 DREW HOWARD & DREW INA       824,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     824700 
50434426090014020 SANDLER PHILIP J & WILLIAM SANDLER C/O       919,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     919650 
50434426090014030 CANDEE SYLVIA P CANDEE SYLVIA P TR       1,046,122.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1393200 
50434426090014040 DONAGHY SALLY        864,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     914400 
50434426090014050 HAMILTON HELENE E        903,280.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     968550 
50434426090014060 HIMMEL HARRIET        1,017,155.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 0406 0400 CONDO 1985   4994    1381800 
50434426090015010 EL LEN HOLDINGS LTD        849,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     849700 
50434426090015020 MOTZNO SELMA        556,678.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     969650 
50434426090015030 YOUNG PHYLLIS L        1,443,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1443200 
50434426090015040 KAPLAN BARBARA F        964,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     964400 
50434426090015050 SKODNEK JEAN        527,276.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     993550 
50434426090015060 FINEBERG SANDRA & FINEBERG GERALD S       1,222,179.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1985   4994    1431800 
50434426090016010 RIESE ANITA THE RIESE ORGANIZATION C/O       1,987,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1985   4994    1987250 
50434426090016030 PLATZER FRANCES        1,493,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1493200 
50434426090016050 DORFRIED ULC BURNETT DUCKWORTH & PALMER C/O       1,418,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1985   4860    1418550 
50434426090016070 KALINER HOWARD        1,034,260.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1985   4619    1289400 
50434426090017010 HILLTIDE INVESTMENTS LIMITED KAREN HOLT VISTRA TRUST CO  JERSEY C/O       2,037,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1985   4994    2037250 
50434426090017030 CRANDALL LOUISE WEST END FINANCIAL C/O       1,543,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1543200 
50434426090017050 KOSSAR BERNARD R & CAROL KOSSAR CAROL       1,118,136.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1985   4827    1503600 
50434426090021010 KENNEY LILLIAN S        444,830.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     749700 
50434426090021020 MILLER LESTER JR & KATHLEEN        769,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     769650 
50434426090021030 SILVERSTEIN RAYMOND SILVERSTEIN RAYMOND TR       669,036.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1243200 
50434426090021040 TUCK LARRY &        764,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     764400 
50434426090021050 THAL NANCY B        898,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     898800 
50434426090021060 ANDRIS THOMAS &        701,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     701400 
50434426090021070 SLESNICK STANLEY & MARLENE SLESNICK TRS       711,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     711900 
50434426090022010 SILVERSTEIN CAROL L        724,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     774700 
50434426090022020 SHAVELL PATRICIA A        819,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     819650 
50434426090022030 ARONSON DEBORAH & DEBORAH ARONSON TR TITL HLDR       1,243,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1293200 
50434426090022040 MULHOLLAND DANIEL B & MULHOLLAND DONNA A       567,457.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     814400 
50434426090022050 ROSENBERG JOAN MESHNICK REVOCABLE MNGMT TRUST       923,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     923800 
50434426090022060 RUBIN ALICE        438,108.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     726400 
50434426090022070 GLICKMAN MARVIN & GLICKMAN BARBARA M       686,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     736900 
50434426090023010 OSOFSKY ALAN B & OSOFSKY DEIRDRE S       749,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     799700 
50434426090023020 WENGER LYNDA        869,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     869650 
50434426090023030 WORLD PRINCESS CORP B RAMSAY C/O       1,343,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1343200 
50434426090023040 MONTIBAR CORP B RAMSAY C/O       864,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     864400 
50434426090023050 HASS IVAN & HASS NATALE       948,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     948800 
50434426090023060 KENIN MICHAEL & LYDIA K POMERANCE       751,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     751400 
50434426090023070 SHORIN ARTHUR T & SHORIN BEVERLY C       761,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     761900 
50434426090024010 MALAMED SEYMOUR H & MALAMED DORIS       703,084.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     824700 
50434426090024020 BARDELIS CHARLES L BARDELIS CHARLES L TR       580,013.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     919650 
50434426090024030 MARTIN PAUL J JR        1,393,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1393200 
50434426090024040 WINNERMAN L J & LORRAINE B        914,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     914400 
50434426090024050 ANTON IRVING        515,044.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     973800 
50434426090024060 RUDOLPH GAIL V        776,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     776400 
50434426090024070 FRANK CHARLOTTE        468,570.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     786900 
50434426090025010 CYKER MARVIN M & CYKER JENNY       1,302,754.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1985   4994    1937250 
50434426090025030 EVE ZETLIN 1998 PERSONAL        1,443,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1443200 
50434426090025040 CARDEG ENT LTD        964,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     964400 
50434426090025050 VEKA PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE OFF C/O       998,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1985   2913     998800 
50434426090025060 PROZER ELIZABETH & NANCY V PROZER       801,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1985   2244     801400 
50434426090025070 WAINER JOSEPH        485,692.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1985   2618     811900 
50434426090026010 KLINE GLORIA P KLINE GLORIA P TRUST       1,335,377.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1985   4994    1987250 
50434426090026030 KOSLOW JOYCE        1,442,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1493200 
50434426090026050 KLEIN ARTHUR S KLEIN ELEANOR H       1,260,344.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1985   4860    1418550 
50434426090026070 TICK PHYLISS TICK SUSAN       1,034,260.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1985   4619    1289400 
50434426090027010 KLEBANOFF MICHAEL & KLEBANOFF ANGELICA       1,987,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1985   4994    2037250 
50434426090027030 KRUPP BERNICE        749,869.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1985   2960    1543200 
50434426090027050 KATZ MAURICE N BERGMAN REUBEN TR       1,323,175.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442609 PALM BEACH HAMPTON CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1985   4827    1503600 
50434426100000000 PALMBEACHER APTS INC        0.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961      0        125 
50434426100001010 STEWART MARY L EST INDUSTRY CONSULT GROUP/JP MORGAN       176,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 101 0510 CO-OP 1961   1193     176400 
50434426100001020 DEIBLER MARGARET        66,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 102 0510 CO-OP 1961    575      66150 
50434426100001030 SIPPEL DAVID M & SANDRA A        107,100.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 103 0510 CO-OP 1961    902     107100 
50434426100001040 FITZGERALD WILLIAM B        123,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 104 0510 CO-OP 1961    978     123900 
50434426100001050 KINDSGRAB HENRY A        114,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 105 0510 CO-OP 1961    876     114450 
50434426100001060 FENNESSY JOHN E        60,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 106 0510 CO-OP 1961    889     110250 
50434426100001070 URBAN MARCELLA        62,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 107 0510 CO-OP 1961    915     112350 
50434426100001080 SHIPEK EDWARD SR & SHIPEK MARY &       106,050.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 108 0510 CO-OP 1961    876     106050 
50434426100001090 FERRAND LOUISE        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 109 0510 CO-OP 1961    865      96600 
50434426100001100 HITTNER ZOE W        96,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 110 0510 CO-OP 1961    865      96600 
50434426100001110 PALMBEACHER APTS INC        48,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 111 0510 CO-OP 1961    865      48300 
50434426100002120 LENAHAN EDWIN & GRACE LENAHAN GRACE       52,532.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 212 0510 CO-OP 1961   1193     202650 
50434426100002140 FLOAT KENNETH M & FLOAT DIANE H       92,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    575      92400 
50434426100002150 TRIVISONNO ANGELO & LORETTA        133,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 215 0510 CO-OP 1961    902     133350 
50434426100002160 FLOAT KENNETH M &        72,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    392      72450 
50434426100002170 AL-ATTAR JAMIL &        150,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    978     150150 
50434426100002180 DEVELLIS COSMO        140,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 218 0510 CO-OP 1961    876     140700 
50434426100002190 KEMPTON RODNEY N & KEMPTON NELANN       136,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    889     136500 
50434426100002200 PARODI FRANK        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 220 0510 CO-OP 1961    915     138600 
50434426100002210 STEVENS FRANCIS J EST MAURICE STEVENS C/O       132,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    876     132300 
50434426100002220 GENNA MICHAEL        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    865     122850 
50434426100003230 SAVAGE PHILIP S JR        52,032.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 323 0510 CO-OP 1961   1193     205650 
50434426100003240 FACELLA CLAIRE M TRUST FACELLA CLAIRE M TRUSTEE       95,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    575      95400 
50434426100003250 CARNER JO ANNE        25,000.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 325 0510 CO-OP 1961    902     136350 
50434426100003260 CARNER JO ANNE        75,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    392      75450 
50434426100003270 BRAUNSCHWEIGER H & GRETCHEN E        153,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    978     153150 
50434426100003280 KAELBER JACOB & KAELBER ROSE       143,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 328 0510 CO-OP 1961    876     143700 
50434426100003290 FROST JAMES O & FROST RITA       139,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    889     139500 
50434426100003300 BECKER PATRICIA        141,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 330 0510 CO-OP 1961    915     141600 
50434426100003310 GRACE MICHAEL S &        135,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 331 0510 CO-OP 1961    876     135300 
50434426100003320 HEINE HAROLD W & MARJORIE B        125,850.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    865     125850 
50434426100004330 STACK LUCILLE & CHERYL J BARNES       76,187.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 433 0510 CO-OP 1961   1193     208650 
50434426100004340 MESKO ROGER A & SUZANNE L TRUST        98,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    575      98400 
50434426100004350 LEE ELIZABETH B & LEE DAVID B       139,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 435 0510 CO-OP 1961    902     139350 
50434426100004360 BRAUNSCHWEIGER HERBERT & BRAUNSCHWEIGER GRETCHEN       78,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 436 0510 CO-OP 1961    392      78450 
50434426100004370 BRAVATA SAM JR        156,150.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    978     156150 
50434426100004380 KUNTZ FRANCES        146,700.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 438 0510 CO-OP 1961    876     146700 
50434426100004390 NICKLASON FRED H &        142,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    889     142500 
50434426100004400 GIULIANO JOSEPHINE R        144,600.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 440 0510 CO-OP 1961    915     144600 
50434426100004410 CARR FRANCIS & CARR JANE       138,300.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    876     138300 
50434426100004420 BUGLASS MARY S TR        24,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    865     128850 
50434426100005430 FAVORITO ALFREDO        211,650.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 543 0510 CO-OP 1961   1193     211650 
50434426100005440 BRAVATA SAM JR        101,400.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 544 0510 CO-OP 1961    575     101400 
50434426100005450 BARBARA A JOLLY TR        142,350.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP 545 0510 CO-OP 1961    902     142350 
50434426100005460 STAYMAN HAROLD W & STAYMAN NORMA H       81,450.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    392      81450 
50434426100005470 BARALO EMIL & LORRAINE        178,500.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961   1048     178500 
50434426100005480 FLANNERY JEAN        72,216.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961   1283     226800 
50434426100005490 ISAAC VIOLETTE        131,250.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961    852     131250 
50434426100005500 SMALL DONALD L & ELIZABETH R        187,950.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961   1143     187950 
50434426100006510 CALLAN HENRY & GARGAN DENNIS P       192,580.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961   1487     269850 
50434426100006520 BRAVATA SAM JR        312,900.00 0 COOPERATIVE                   5043442610 PALMBEACHER APTS INC CO-OP  0510 CO-OP 1961   1697     312900 
50434426110140030 CASEY CHRISTINE K & CASEY THOMAS J       3,166,800.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM PH 3 0400 CONDO 2006   4651    3166800 
50434426110140040 HABER MANNY        2,868,600.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM PH 4 0400 CONDO 2006   4951    2868600 
50434426110142010 JACOBS SHERRY R & JACOBS STEPHEN E       1,535,100.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 201 0400 CONDO 2006   3064    1535100 
50434426110142020 KRAUTMAN JEFFREY & KRAUTMAN SHARON       1,037,400.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 202 0400 CONDO 2006   2273    1037400 
50434426110142030 C A L L TRUST & JOSEE LACOSTE & GILLES LAPLANTE TRS       1,697,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 203 0400 CONDO 2006   3332    1697850 
50434426110142040 HABER MANNY        2,198,700.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 204 0400 CONDO 2006   3808    2198700 
50434426110143010 OBSER HERIBERT & OBSER JEANETTE G       1,570,100.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 301 0400 CONDO 2006   3064    1570100 
50434426110143020 CAPLAN BERNARD JR & CAPLAN DOROTHY L       676,442.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 302 0400 CONDO 2006   2273    1062400 
50434426110143030 KAPLAN GLENN & KAPLAN SUSAN       1,747,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 303 0400 CONDO 2006   3332    1747850 
50434426110143040 PREMIER PALM BEACH LP        2,248,700.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 304 0400 CONDO 2006   3808    2248700 
50434426110144010 DEMUSSI JOSEPH A & DEMUSSI MAUREEN H       1,605,100.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 401 0400 CONDO 2006   3064    1605100 
50434426110144020 BROWN ROBERT & BROWN SUELLEN       1,087,400.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 402 0400 CONDO 2006   2273    1087400 
50434426110144030 CONSTANTINI DOMENIC L TRUST CONSTANTINI DOMENIC L TR       1,797,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 403 0400 CONDO 2006   3332    1797850 
50434426110144040 HABER MANNY        2,298,700.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 404 0400 CONDO 2006   3808    2298700 
50434426110145010 PK CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC        1,640,100.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 501 0400 CONDO 2006   3064    1640100 
50434426110145020 ROSENTHAL LARRY & ROSENTHAL SANDRA       1,112,400.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 502 0400 CONDO 2006   2273    1112400 
50434426110145030 FREEMAN ROBERT        1,847,850.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 503 0400 CONDO 2006   3332    1847850 
50434426110145040 MANDEL SAM & MANDEL ANNETTE       1,995,580.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 504 0400 CONDO 2006   3808    2348700 
50434426110190060 HOLLOWAY W RANDALL FAMILY TRUST HOLLOWAY W RANDALL TRUSTEE       4,172,700.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM PH 6 0400 CONDO 2006   5720    4172700 
50434426110190070 LIA DON        3,724,350.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM PH 7 0400 CONDO 2006   5067    3724350 
50434426110192050 KAGANOVSKY LAZAR & KAGANOVSKY ELINA       2,568,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 205 0400 CONDO 2006   4447    2568300 
50434426110192060 SCHLUSSEL LAWRENCE A SCHLUSSEL LAWRENCE A TR       1,960,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 206 0400 CONDO 2006   3717    2010750 
50434426110192070 WREN JOHN D III & WREN DIANE       2,398,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 207 0400 CONDO 2006   3680    2398200 
50434426110192080 KNIGHT ANDREA & KNIGHT JOHN L       2,171,400.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 208 0400 CONDO 2006   3219    2171400 
50434426110193050 HOLLOWAY W RANDALL TRUST HOLLOWAY W RANDALL TRUSTEE       2,618,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 305 0400 CONDO 2006   4447    2618300 
50434426110193060 SPORK ANNE L        2,060,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 306 0400 CONDO 2006   3717    2060750 
50434426110193070 3000 SOUTH OCEAN BOULEVARD        2,448,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 307 0400 CONDO 2006   3680    2448200 
50434426110193080 LUKES PETER        1,788,150.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 308 0400 CONDO 2006   3219    1788150 
50434426110194050 BENSON ELIZABETH H        2,668,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 405 0400 CONDO 2006   4447    2668300 
50434426110194060 DEMICCO TOBY        2,110,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 406 0400 CONDO 2006   3717    2110750 
50434426110194070 REGAL ROSALYN J MELVYN REGAL TR TITL HLDR       2,498,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 407 0400 CONDO 2006   3680    2498200 
50434426110194080 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC SACHS & SAX C/O       2,271,400.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 408 0400 CONDO 2006   3219    2271400 
50434426110195050 YURKO ALLEN M & YURKO GAYLE M       2,718,300.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 505 0400 CONDO 2006   4447    2718300 
50434426110195060 EDELL STEVEN L TRUST & EDELL MIRIAM F TRUST       2,160,750.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 506 0400 CONDO 2006   3717    2160750 
50434426110195070 AMSC LLC        2,548,200.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 507 0400 CONDO 2006   3680    2548200 
50434426110195080 MALLEY ALFRED & MALLEY JANIS       2,321,400.00 1 CONDOMINIUM                   5043442611 BELLARIA CONDOMINIUM 508 0400 CONDO 2006   3219    2321400 
50434435000010010 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO APTS INC       0.00 0.33 R/W - BUFFER                           
50434435020001010 CASH THOMAS        277,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     277200 
50434435020001020 SZMUNESS MAYA TR        59,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     246750 
50434435020001030 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION S TR AMERICAS SERV CO/WELLS FARGO BK C/O       239,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     239400 
50434435020001050 GARCIA RICARDO & GARCIA MARIA M       246,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     246750 
50434435020001060 BRESSMAN LILLIAN & SACKLER BETH B       517,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     517650 
50434435020001080 MORRIS JAMES R & ANGELONE ELIZABETH       417,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     417900 
50434435020001090 SIEGLER ROBERT A & SIEGLER MARIE T       544,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     594300 
50434435020001100 BRASSNER JULES        246,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     246750 
50434435020001110 KOIVUMAKI LIISA HANNELE        165,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1110 0400 CONDO 1967    891     165900 
50434435020001130 MITTERMAIER CHERI        199,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1130 0400 CONDO 1967    891     199500 
50434435020001140 MILENOVIC ZORAN        49,743.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1140 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     239400 
50434435020001150 CALLO DOMINICK F        246,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1150 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     246750 
50434435020001160 CORNELL DOROTHY CORNELL DOROTHY TR       277,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 1160 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     277200 
50434435020002010 DOAK DEBRA A & COLE KIMBERLY R       282,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     282200 
50434435020002020 SAUNDERS CHARLES D TR        251,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     251750 
50434435020002030 ZIMMERMAN MARJORIE & ZIMMERMAN SUZANNE A       244,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     244400 
50434435020002040 PARISI CARMELO &        198,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1967    891     198200 
50434435020002050 CLARKE CAROL & JAMES P CLARKE       251,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     251750 
50434435020002060 LUCINDA LLC        522,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     522650 
50434435020002080 STREN STEPHEN J        427,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     427900 
50434435020002090 ADELMAN STANLEY J & MARY B        604,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     604300 
50434435020002100 BIVINS KARIN C BIVINS EUGENE S       201,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     251750 
50434435020002110 DEW AMI        63,125.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1967    891     170900 
50434435020002120 MILTON DOVER LLC        170,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1967    891     170900 
50434435020002130 STRYKER RONDA E STRYKER JON L       204,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2130 0400 CONDO 1967    891     204500 
50434435020002140 KOLINEK ROBERT B TRUST        244,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     244400 
50434435020002150 DE LOMBARDO LAURA B & VITTORIA MAURIZIO L       251,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     251750 
50434435020002160 SAMPSON JOHN A &        282,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     282200 
50434435020003010 HAAS ERIKA        93,752.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     287200 
50434435020003020 NUQUI MAGNO M & NUQUI ARACELI       256,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     256750 
50434435020003030 ALVAREZ GERMAN &        249,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     249400 
50434435020003040 BENMUVHAR EDDY BENMUVHAR EDDY TR       24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1967    891     203200 
50434435020003050 BASI JAMES        206,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     256750 
50434435020003060 POWELL JERRY        265,353.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     527650 
50434435020003080 CURTIS FAMILY LIVING TRUST CURTIS RUSSELL E JR TR       437,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     437900 
50434435020003090 MCADAMS EDWARD F & MCADAMS MARY ANN       614,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     614300 
50434435020003100 WILDERMAN JAY & WILDERMAN PHYLLIS       256,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     256750 
50434435020003110 AVENIROV ALEXANDER &        175,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1967    891     175900 
50434435020003120 BENINATO JEAN L        175,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1967    891     175900 
50434435020003130 BRUNO JOSEPH L & BRUNO LAURA J       209,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3130 0400 CONDO 1967    891     209500 
50434435020003140 KOTLER MORRIS & KOTLER MARCIE       249,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     249400 
50434435020003150 WOLFE NORINA V        206,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     256750 
50434435020003160 SHATIN HARRY & VERA AJFCS GRD PROGRAM C/O       287,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     287200 
50434435020004010 IACONO SALVATORE & IACONO FRANCA       292,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     292200 
50434435020004020 NAPLES CATHERINE        261,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     261750 
50434435020004030 MC LAUGHLIN KATHY V        254,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     254400 
50434435020004040 VALDMANIS F & AINA        208,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1967    891     208200 
50434435020004050 MOSCONE IOLANDA        261,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     261750 
50434435020004060 BLANKE ADA R BLANKE ADA R TR       482,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     532650 
50434435020004080 CARLSTROM ERROL F        94,922.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     447900 
50434435020004090 LENDMAN ERNEST M & LENDMAN ETTA H       159,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     624300 
50434435020004100 COLLODI DAVID COLLODI CHRISTIAN       211,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     261750 
50434435020004110 HERRERA ALVARO F HERRERA MATILDE       180,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1967    891     180900 
50434435020004120 CALANDRA TED A SR &        180,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1967    891     180900 
50434435020004130 MANNING SIMON A &        214,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4130 0400 CONDO 1967    891     214500 
50434435020004140 LINN MARK E & COYNER EARLENE       254,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     254400 
50434435020004150 ALVAREZ GERMAN &        261,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     261750 
50434435020004160 FERLISI GIOACCHINO & FERLISI CARMELA       292,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     292200 
50434435020005010 CHACHOLIADES MILTIADES & CHACHOLIADES MARY       82,635.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     297200 
50434435020005020 PADMANABHA ANANTHA & PADMANABHA VANI       266,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     266750 
50434435020005030 ERTEL LEWIS & ERTEL ROBERTA       259,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     259400 
50434435020005040 OUDSEMA R N & MARGARET M        213,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1967    891     213200 
50434435020005050 KAZMERS MARIS & KAZMERS MARILYN       266,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     266750 
50434435020005060 ENGEL JEFFREY & MERRICK ENGEL & CORINNE ENGEL       537,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     537650 
50434435020005080 SAMMARONE CHARLES P & SAMMARONE MARY A       457,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     457900 
50434435020005090 BLACKMAN MICHAEL J & ELIZABETH BLCKMAN H/W       144,855.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     634300 
50434435020005100 SAVAGE JULIAN & SAVAGE NANCY       266,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     266750 
50434435020005110 ZAFIROS BETTY & JAMES        185,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1967    891     185900 
50434435020005120 CORONA JUAN & CORONA CARLOTA       135,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1967    891     185900 
50434435020005130 JANES EVERETT TR        219,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5130 0400 CONDO 1967    891     219500 
50434435020005140 RODRIGUEZ SERGIO RODRIGUEZ MARTA M       130,996.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     259400 
50434435020005150 SEIDMAN STEPHEN & SONDRA SONDRA SEIDMAN       62,448.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     266750 
50434435020005160 MALEK ROSE A        297,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     297200 
50434435020006010 KATZ ROZALIA KATZ ANDREW       82,848.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     302200 
50434435020006020 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK        271,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     271750 
50434435020006030 PAGE JAMES & PAGE FRANCES       214,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     264400 
50434435020006040 PHILLIPS PEGGY L        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1967    891     218200 
50434435020006050 MATTIOLI LIVING TRUST        271,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     271750 
50434435020006060 WEINSTEIN HELEN & WEINSTEIN LAWRENCE       542,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     542650 
50434435020006080 DOYLE LORRAINE        467,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     467900 
50434435020006090 MUSINSKY DONALD B & MUNSINSKY JANICE F       644,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     644300 
50434435020006100 HARRISON MILTON S & HARRISON TERRI L       271,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     271750 
50434435020006110 DAS PRANAB K TRUST DAS PRANAB K & PHYLLIS DAS TRS       190,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1967    891     190900 
50434435020006120 MULLALY THOMAS & FRANCES        190,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1967    891     190900 
50434435020006130 MORGENTSTEIN VALENTINE        57,524.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6130 0400 CONDO 1967    891     224500 
50434435020006140 JONES ALICE MARIE INVESTMENT TRUST JONES ALICE M TRUSTEE       264,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     264400 
50434435020006150 ABDEL MALEK ROSE        63,162.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     271750 
50434435020006160 ABDEL MALEK ROSE & ABDEL MALEK NEVINE       302,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     302200 
50434435020007010 ROMANELLI ROCCO TRUST ROCCO ROMANELLI TR       307,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     307200 
50434435020007020 CHAMPAGNE RONALD & RUTH I        276,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     276750 
50434435020007030 SCHMITT THOMAS & SCHMITT CHRISTINE       219,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     269400 
50434435020007040 KOPET SANDRA        223,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1967    891     223200 
50434435020007050 AUSTIN AUDREY        63,374.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     276750 
50434435020007060 RYAN NORMA RYAN NORMA TR       350,784.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     547650 
50434435020007080 SILPE JAY M & TRACY L TRACY L SILPE       93,204.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     477900 
50434435020007090 GONNELLA LOUIS J TRUST GONNELLA LOUIS J  TR       654,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1967   2002     654300 
50434435020007100 PASTORE RALPH        276,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     276750 
50434435020007110 LEFTA ENTERPRISES LLC        195,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1967    891     195900 
50434435020007120 DIEZ ANDRES & DIEZ SUSAN D       195,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7120 0400 CONDO 1967    891     195900 
50434435020007130 CARAVAGGI BRUNO TR        229,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7130 0400 CONDO 1967    891     229500 
50434435020007140 ERFE ALBERTO V & ERFE HILDA G       269,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7140 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     269400 
50434435020007150 VILLARE FRANCESKA A        276,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7150 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     276750 
50434435020007160 BOWN ANTHONY J        307,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 7160 0400 CONDO 1967   1395     307200 
50434435020008010 ROVIN MATHILDE A        240,679.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8010 0400 CONDO 1967   2457     572250 
50434435020008020 KAHN STUART &        613,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8020 0400 CONDO 1967   2544     613200 
50434435020008030 GOODMAN ELEANOR A        554,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8030 0400 CONDO 1967   2147     554400 
50434435020008040 NUQUI MAGNO M &        238,674.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8040 0400 CONDO 1967   2054     775950 
50434435020008050 FURMAN S RONALD TR        800,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8050 0400 CONDO 1967   2727     800100 
50434435020008060 DIAMENT SCOTT        258,541.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8060 0400 CONDO 1967   3497     767550 
50434435020008070 TOMARCHIO FREDRIC A & TOMARCHIO MARCIA M       613,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8070 0400 CONDO 1967   2544     613200 
50434435020008080 VAN DOORNE JOHN R & CAROL A VAN DOORNE CAROL A       180,729.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443502 LA BONNE VIE CONDO 8080 0400 CONDO 1967   2457     572250 
50434435030000010 PATRICIAN OF P B COND ASSOC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434435030000010 PATRICIAN OF P B COND ASSOC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD                           
50434435030000020 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH ASSOC        0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1979      0      84000 
50434435030001020 RUSSO FRANK        150,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1979    852     150150 
50434435030001030 QUINN WALTER        260,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     260400 
50434435030001040 CASABONA ESPERANZA        24,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     177450 
50434435030001050 MCTAMMANY W & MARGARET R MC TAMMANY MARGARET R       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     177450 
50434435030001060 MCTAMMANY HEATHER        180,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     180600 
50434435030001070 PALOKA GJOK        256,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     256200 
50434435030001080 HERNANDEXZ CARLOS        241,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     291900 
50434435030001090 GUSTAFSON ERICK S & GUSTAFSON DONNA S       291,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     291900 
50434435030001100 GUINEY CORNELIUS        250,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     250950 
50434435030001110 GUSTAFSON ERICK S & ERICK & DONNA GUSTAFSON ET AL TR HLDRS       55,001.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     189000 
50434435030001120 EISEN DANIEL & ANTONYA        183,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     183750 
50434435030001140 FULTON ANDREW III & FULTON MARIAN B       183,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     183750 
50434435030001150 JIMESON ROY E &        259,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     259350 
50434435030001170 SINGER SYDELLE SINGER SYDELLE TR       234,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     284550 
50434435030001180 MOLONEY EDWARD J JR &        218,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     218400 
50434435030001190 ALTMAN CAROL        213,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     213150 
50434435030001200 QUARANTA JOHN & QUARANTA ROSEMARIE       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     179550 
50434435030001210 TULL HELENE L TULL HELENE L TR       24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     179550 
50434435030001220 BLOCH MURIEL        78,042.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     280350 
50434435030001230 PALOKA ZEF        120,247.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     256200 
50434435030001240 DANTEN ANAID DANTEN ANAID TR       68,724.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     174300 
50434435030001250 BAKUNAS CAROL        124,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     174300 
50434435030001260 THORPE FRANCIS T        150,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     200550 
50434435030002010 THORPE LOUISE        265,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     265400 
50434435030002020 RUSSO FRANK        155,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1971    852     155150 
50434435030002030 MANENTE ANTONIA        46,010.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     265400 
50434435030002040 PALERMO MARY A        182,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     182450 
50434435030002050 PALERMO MARY A        182,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     182450 
50434435030002060 RYAN MARGUERITE HASTIE DONALD W       185,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     185600 
50434435030002070 PETRUZZELLO ANTHONY A & PETRUZZELLO LINDA       266,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     266200 
50434435030002080 FERRIS ALFRED J & LOUISE M        311,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     311900 
50434435030002090 EDELMEN MARTIN &        255,566.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     311900 
50434435030002100 GRIFFITH LISA        260,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     260950 
50434435030002110 SCHWARTZ LAURIE F        199,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     199000 
50434435030002120 EDELMAN MARTIN & EDELMAN CATHERINE       191,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     191250 
50434435030002140 RICE LEWIS H        191,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     191250 
50434435030002150 DI MAIOLO PASQUALE & DI MAIOLO ANNA       269,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     269350 
50434435030002160 SATURNINO JAMES P & SATURNINO MARILYN E       294,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     294550 
50434435030002170 LASORZA FRANCESCA        63,376.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     294550 
50434435030002180 JARVIE RAYMOND M & JARVIE SUSAN       223,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     223400 
50434435030002190 FLORES CARLOS J        218,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     218150 
50434435030002200 DEIHL JOSEPH R & DEIHL DONNA       184,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     184550 
50434435030002210 FEATHERSTONE CHARLES P        184,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     184550 
50434435030002220 GORDON IRENE R        79,031.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     290350 
50434435030002230 JOHNSON CHARLES O        266,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     266200 
50434435030002240 BEYER MARIE A        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     179300 
50434435030002250 QUINN WALTER        179,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     179300 
50434435030002260 GOLDSTEIN RUTH        107,614.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     205550 
50434435030002270 KACOHA MARGARET        25,328.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2270 0400 CONDO 1971    852     155150 
50434435030002280 KWELLER MARILYN D MARILYN D KWELLER TR TITL HLDR       27,111.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2280 0400 CONDO 1971    952     185600 
50434435030003010 COOK IDA COOK IDA TR       91,024.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     270400 
50434435030003020 REDL DONALD P        110,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1971    852     160150 
50434435030003030 PAPPALARDO SOCCORSO & MAIRE        270,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     270400 
50434435030003040 YOUSSEF GEORGE N        137,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     187450 
50434435030003050 RADOVICH PETER & RADOVICH MIRANDA       187,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     187450 
50434435030003060 BINDER ROBERTA S BINDER ROBERTA S TR       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     190600 
50434435030003070 XISTRIS MARGARET & XISTRIS VICTOR D       276,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     276200 
50434435030003080 JEYAPAUL MULLENS & JEYAPAUL NIRMALA       331,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     331900 
50434435030003090 PAFITIS ANDREW & PAFITIS KATY       331,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     331900 
50434435030003100 MARTIN PAUL J JR        270,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     270950 
50434435030003110 ULRICH JOHN J        209,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     209000 
50434435030003120 POCCIA ADELE        198,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     198750 
50434435030003140 BLOCH CHERYL BLOCH CHERYL TR       148,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     198750 
50434435030003150 ROCKEFELLER MICHELLE TRUST        279,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     279350 
50434435030003160 EUGSTER KATHE D EUGSTER  KATHE D TR       246,867.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     304550 
50434435030003170 RODRIGUEZ LISETTE        254,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     304550 
50434435030003180 CROWLEY JAMES &        131,599.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     228400 
50434435030003190 WLUKA JANE        223,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     223150 
50434435030003200 TRATNIK FRANK        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     189550 
50434435030003210 FRANCO CAROL        189,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     189550 
50434435030003220 HALPER ROSLYN        79,019.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     300350 
50434435030003230 SERAFIN JANE M        226,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     276200 
50434435030003240 QUINN WALTER        184,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     184300 
50434435030003250 BRAMNICK JUDIE        184,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     184300 
50434435030003260 ABRAMSON HERBERT L & HERBERT & RUTH ABRAMSON ET AL TR HLDRS       110,167.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     210550 
50434435030003270 VIZIRGIANAKIS GUDRUN P        66,485.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3270 0400 CONDO 1971    852     160150 
50434435030003280 CATANZANO MITCHELL        190,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3280 0400 CONDO 1971    952     190600 
50434435030004010 CRUPI ANTONIO & CRUPI OLIVIA       275,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     275400 
50434435030004020 SCHWARTZ C HAROLD & SCHWARTZ IRENE A       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1971    852     165150 
50434435030004030 MOLINE NATALIE        275,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     275400 
50434435030004040 INGHAM BARRIE S & INGHAM JOAN T       142,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     192450 
50434435030004050 DECRISTOFARO SUSAN B        192,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     192450 
50434435030004060 DIONISIO LOUIS &        195,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     195600 
50434435030004070 FLANNERY DENNIS E &        286,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     286200 
50434435030004080 RHODA MARIANNE K        351,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     351900 
50434435030004090 HERMAN ALICE K        63,855.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     351900 
50434435030004100 VAN SHIRLEY        46,489.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     280950 
50434435030004110 GROSS MERLE TR        219,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     219000 
50434435030004120 KRANTZ JACQUELINE TR        206,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     206250 
50434435030004140 ARNSTEIN RUTH P        24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     206250 
50434435030004150 SUSSMAN BERNARD & SUSSMAN FRANCINE       72,716.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     289350 
50434435030004160 SYKES HELEN H        314,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     314550 
50434435030004170 SHAMESMAN BERNARD & BERNARD HAMESMAN ET AL TR HLDRS       64,355.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     314550 
50434435030004180 MERKADO FRED & LILLIAN G TRS        233,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     233400 
50434435030004190 CERCHIO ANNE        228,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     228150 
50434435030004200 SUSSER HERBERT & GLORIA        194,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     194550 
50434435030004210 WARSHAW ISADORE        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     194550 
50434435030004220 HOROWITZ RICHARD HOROWITZ WENDY       87,910.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     310350 
50434435030004230 BURKE WALTER A        46,989.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     286200 
50434435030004240 ROSENBERG JULIE        189,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     189300 
50434435030004250 GOLDSTEIN BARRY & GOLDSTEIN LEAT       189,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     189300 
50434435030004260 GREENBERG PETER W & CHODOROW PEGGY A       215,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     215550 
50434435030004270 FEDERER GERTRUDE        165,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4270 0400 CONDO 1971    852     165150 
50434435030004280 SPINA KERSH ELEANOR HENRY BEIDERBECKE C/O       195,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4280 0400 CONDO 1971    952     195600 
50434435030005010 VOLOVICK MARILYN S TRUST VOLOVICK JON B TR       280,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     280400 
50434435030005020 LYNN ELLIOTT M & EDNA        170,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1971    852     170150 
50434435030005030 NARUTOWICZ JAMES A SR &        280,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     280400 
50434435030005040 MURAWSKI ELIZABETH A        24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     197450 
50434435030005050 DIAFERIA MICHELE        147,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     197450 
50434435030005060 BALDWIN LYNNE T        200,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     200600 
50434435030005070 PALOKA SHPRESA        296,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     296200 
50434435030005080 MEYERSON EDWIN        371,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     371900 
50434435030005090 STEINGUT FLORENCE R        64,342.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     371900 
50434435030005100 AUMOLA JAAKKO        290,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     290950 
50434435030005110 GARDNER BRIAN        229,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     229000 
50434435030005120 HOWARD MICHAEL &        213,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     213750 
50434435030005140 ROZZERO ARTHUR E        213,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     213750 
50434435030005150 LIPSON RICHARD        299,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     299350 
50434435030005160 VESCELIUS CLINTON H        64,832.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     324550 
50434435030005170 BROMING WILLIAM F & ELISE C BROMING ELISE C       64,842.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     324550 
50434435030005180 LAHTI LIVING TRUST LAHTI RUDOLPH H TRUSTEE &       238,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     238400 
50434435030005190 CARTER RONALD        129,208.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     233150 
50434435030005200 WARSHAW HELEN EST        199,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     199550 
50434435030005210 LAGREGA THOMAS J SR LAGREGA THOMAS J SR TR       25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     199550 
50434435030005220 GORMAN DAVID        320,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     320350 
50434435030005230 HOWARD ROBERTA        133,688.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     296200 
50434435030005240 CORONEL STEEVE CORONEL STEEVE TR       144,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     194300 
50434435030005250 EPSTEIN LEONARD T        194,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     194300 
50434435030005260 DAVOLIO HELEN        56,510.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     220550 
50434435030005270 MASNARI-RICE JACQUELINE C        170,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5270 0400 CONDO 1971    852     170150 
50434435030005280 CATAREVAS MORRIS CATAREVAS ESTHER       119,638.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5280 0400 CONDO 1971    952     200600 
50434435030006010 CABEZAS XIMENA        235,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     285400 
50434435030006020 KARFELD FLORENCE        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1971    852     175150 
50434435030006030 MICHAELS ROBERT PAUL TRUST        101,797.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     285400 
50434435030006040 ROCKEFELLER MICHELLE TRUST ROCKEFELLER MICHELLE TR       202,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     202450 
50434435030006050 SHIELDS JANE A        202,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     202450 
50434435030006060 RUSSO DARCY H        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     205600 
50434435030006070 LEEDS DORIS G        306,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     306200 
50434435030006080 DAY MALCOLM M DAY CHARLOTTE       391,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     391900 
50434435030006090 IANNIELLO RICHARD J        391,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     391900 
50434435030006100 HASENFRATZ HERMINE D        47,966.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     300950 
50434435030006110 VAN SICKLE MARIA E        239,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     239000 
50434435030006120 SHIELDS JAMES L & SHIELDS JANE A       221,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     221250 
50434435030006140 CARRIER PAUL W & CARRIER GISELE A       171,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     221250 
50434435030006150 GOLDSTEIN ARTHUR & GOLDSTEIN ANNE M       309,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     309350 
50434435030006160 SCHULDENFREI ROBERT ROBERT SCHULDENFREI ET AL TR HLDRS       284,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     334550 
50434435030006170 AINSWORTH MARJORIE        157,828.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     334550 
50434435030006180 HUBER JOHN M TR        243,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     243400 
50434435030006190 QUINN WALTER        238,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     238150 
50434435030006200 TAPANES FRANCISCO & TAPANES ESTELA       154,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     204550 
50434435030006210 BERGER JOSEPH        204,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     204550 
50434435030006220 LASOFF ALLEN & ANNABEL        330,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     330350 
50434435030006230 MOREL A STEPHEN & MILDRED D MOREL TRS       306,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     306200 
50434435030006240 CROWELL HENRY F        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     199300 
50434435030006250 CHILDS CACIOPPO REGINA        199,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     199300 
50434435030006260 SHIFMAN MONNA        47,966.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     225550 
50434435030006270 NEIMAN BARBARA        175,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6270 0400 CONDO 1971    852     175150 
50434435030006280 GAILIS N & DAINA        205,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6280 0400 CONDO 1971    952     205600 
50434435030007010 KOLAN MATTHEW S & MARY D        290,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     290400 
50434435030007020 PETRUZZI MARGUERITE        180,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1971    852     180150 
50434435030007030 LATERZA MICHELE A        240,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     290400 
50434435030007040 ROSENBLOOM KEVIN        207,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     207450 
50434435030007050 CATALANO BEATRICE N        207,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     207450 
50434435030007060 MORRISSEY L T & SMILJA TRUST MORRISSEY LAWRENCE TR       210,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     210600 
50434435030007070 DORFMAN HOWARD & DORFMAN TERRY       316,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     316200 
50434435030007080 PENN ROBERT D TR PENN CHRISTOPHER TR       411,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     411900 
50434435030007090 SEBOK GEORGE & SEBOK MARIANNE       130,329.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     411900 
50434435030007100 MORRIS LEONARD B &        48,455.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     310950 
50434435030007110 GREENE HAROLD M & GREENE ROSEANN       249,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     249000 
50434435030007120 VIZIRGIANAKIS GUDRUN P        228,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     228750 
50434435030007140 OLIN MICHAEL & KULPA JEAN       228,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     228750 
50434435030007150 BERNTEN JAY M        319,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     319350 
50434435030007160 KATZ MORRIS & FRANCINE J        344,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7160 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     344550 
50434435030007170 COSTELLO MATTHEW        294,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     344550 
50434435030007180 STEIN LYNNE K & KAPLAN EDWARD L EST       47,955.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     248400 
50434435030007190 MURPHY JOHN J & MURPHY PAMELA J       243,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     243150 
50434435030007200 DACKSON KENNETH & ARLENE        209,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     209550 
50434435030007210 HAP MIRA        209,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     209550 
50434435030007220 COPPER JOAN H        340,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     340350 
50434435030007230 FENVESSY STANLEY J & DORIS        316,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     316200 
50434435030007240 VIZIRGIANAKIS CHARIS        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     204300 
50434435030007250 SKILLERN SARA & KRAMER ERIC       204,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     204300 
50434435030007260 KORACH ROBERT ALEX        230,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     230550 
50434435030007270 RICCIARDELLI GERARD &        130,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7270 0400 CONDO 1971    852     180150 
50434435030007280 LALONDE FRANK & LALONDE MARILYNE R       210,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7280 0400 CONDO 1971    952     210600 
50434435030008010 CATAREVAS MORRIS &        295,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8010 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     295400 
50434435030008020 RICHMOND THEODORA K        186,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8020 0400 CONDO 1971    852     186900 
50434435030008030 APPLEMAN ROSS GUARDIANSHIP APPLEMAN ELEANOR GRDN       295,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8030 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     295400 
50434435030008040 HOBBS MARGARET V        25,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8040 0400 CONDO 1971    952     212450 
50434435030008050 SURICO RITA        212,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8050 0400 CONDO 1971    952     212450 
50434435030008060 DESAI INDIRA        215,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8060 0400 CONDO 1971    952     215600 
50434435030008070 DESAI INDIRA        326,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8070 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     326200 
50434435030008080 COHEN JACK D COHEN ETTA R       66,310.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8080 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     431900 
50434435030008090 BERNARD MARVIN & BERNARD JEREMY  C/O       431,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8090 0400 CONDO 1971   1496     431900 
50434435030008100 KRENTS MAX TR & KRENTS EDNA S TR       57,937.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8100 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     320950 
50434435030008110 TANENBAUM MELVYN        259,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8110 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     259000 
50434435030008120 BABKIE BARBARA        236,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8120 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     236250 
50434435030008140 CRUPI JOHN C &        236,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8140 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     236250 
50434435030008150 SILLIMAN BETH        329,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8150 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     329350 
50434435030008160 OWEN DONALD T & OWEN COLLEEN G       354,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8160 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     354550 
50434435030008170 WILLNER CARL S WILLNER CARL S TR       66,310.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8170 0400 CONDO 1971   1548     354550 
50434435030008180 HOROWITZ KATHERINE        48,944.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8180 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     253400 
50434435030008190 GROSS RAE GROSS RAE TR       48,444.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8190 0400 CONDO 1971   1293     248150 
50434435030008200 GODSIL THERESA S        214,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8200 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     214550 
50434435030008210 SMITH GORDON A & SMITH AILEEN P       117,464.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8210 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     214550 
50434435030008220 CLARE NAOMI EST CLARE NAOMI TR       350,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8220 0400 CONDO 1971   1670     350350 
50434435030008230 KENISON PAUL        64,535.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8230 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     326200 
50434435030008240 FRADERA DENNYS E        58,426.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8240 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     209300 
50434435030008250 HAMMER LEAH DREBEN JOAN   C/O       24,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8250 0400 CONDO 1971   1008     209300 
50434435030008260 GARDNER WILLIAM S & GARDNER BECKY A       235,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8260 0400 CONDO 1971   1292     235550 
50434435030008270 BAKER ELEANOR M        185,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8270 0400 CONDO 1971    852     185150 
50434435030008280 SCHENCK HANS U        215,600.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443503 PATRICIAN OF PALM BEACH CONDO 8280 0400 CONDO 1971    952     215600 
50434435050010010 CLARDIGES CONDOMINIUM INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1973 1973 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     572480      16822         
50434435050010010 CLARDIGES CONDOMINIUM INC        0.00 0 OUTDR REC/PK LD           1973 1973 0001 01 3 FIRE PROOF     572480      16822         
50434435050011010 RUVOLDT HAROLD J & FLEMING CATHY       336,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1973   1445     336000 
50434435050011020 HARRIS HELEN TR        312,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     312900 
50434435050011030 SCHWARTZ MITCHELL J        126,477.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     340200 
50434435050011040 SANPEDRO BENITO P        169,450.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     219450 
50434435050011050 MCINTOSH MARY HOUPPERT &        263,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     263550 
50434435050011060 BERG JOEL & BERG GOLDIE       257,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     257250 
50434435050011070 RUBENSTEIN BEATRICE        95,174.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1973   1384     250950 
50434435050012010 WEINER NATHAN & NAOMI        388,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1973   1445     388500 
50434435050012020 VAN GELDER LEON & AUDREY        365,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     365400 
50434435050012030 MORIN MARCO & MORIN MARYANN       392,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     392700 
50434435050012040 MCVEIGH WILLIAM R & MCVEIGH RUTH A       85,571.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     266700 
50434435050012050 GILL RALPH & GILL ELAINE       72,930.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     289800 
50434435050012060 SHUMAN LARRY A & SHUMAN GLORIA G       233,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     283500 
50434435050012070 EHRENBERG ROBERT &        277,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1973   1384     277200 
50434435050013010 GRUMET SIDNEY & GRUMET MAY       115,111.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1973   1445     408500 
50434435050013020 ROVELLI THERESA        196,526.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     385400 
50434435050013030 EPSTEIN SHIRLEY TRUST & EPSTEIN DANIEL C/O       412,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     412700 
50434435050013040 LEGATO JOSEPH JR        226,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     276700 
50434435050013050 BIRNBAUM MILTON & BIRNBAUM RUTH &       78,419.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     299800 
50434435050013060 COHEN MICHAEL B &        293,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     293500 
50434435050013070 OSHEA EDWARD        287,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1973   1384     287200 
50434435050014010 SIX FIVE SEVEN NINE FOUR TWO        428,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1973   1445     428500 
50434435050014020 PAPPALARDO JOSEPH PAPPALARDO MAGDA       405,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     405400 
50434435050014030 POHANIS LUCAS J & POHANIS HELEN       432,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     432700 
50434435050014040 KREISS SUSAN        286,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     286700 
50434435050014050 OCARROLL PATRICK J C/O ST LUKES CHURCH       309,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     309800 
50434435050014060 RUBIN NATALIE RUBIN NATALIE TR       253,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     303500 
50434435050014070 SAUL LEON & EILEEN        297,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1973   1384     297200 
50434435050015010 MARCOVICI MARTIN RESIDUARY TRUST MARCOVICI MIA TR       448,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1973   1445     448500 
50434435050015020 JAFFE RONALD G & JAFFE MARLENE I       425,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     425400 
50434435050015030 FISHER GEORGE & ANNETTE FISHER GEORGE       98,615.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     452700 
50434435050015040 PICO MARCOS TR &        296,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     296700 
50434435050015050 SIMOVICH ENRIQUE & SIMOVICH SARA       102,937.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     319800 
50434435050015060 ABRAMS HAROLD A ABRAMS HAROLD A TR       85,145.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     313500 
50434435050015070 GARBER RICHARD P REVOCABLE TRUST        307,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1973   1384     307200 
50434435050016010 ELLIS PETER K &        468,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1973   1445     468500 
50434435050016020 MCVAN PATRICK E        395,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     445400 
50434435050016030 DAMIA PAULINE K        344,734.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     472700 
50434435050016040 PUTCHAT CYNTHIA        306,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     306700 
50434435050016050 TRAMONTANA MICHAEL & TRAMONTANA CATHERINE       90,246.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     329800 
50434435050016060 ANTALEK MELINDA B &        323,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     323500 
50434435050016070 PUCILLO CHESTER        317,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1973   1384     317200 
50434435050017010 ISAACS GERTRUDE & BERNARD M & GERTRUDE ISAACS TR HLDRS       91,415.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1973   1445     488500 
50434435050017020 SPILKER MARC A        465,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     465400 
50434435050017030 KITER RAYMOND F        146,309.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     492700 
50434435050017040 ORNSTEIN LEONA        80,611.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     316700 
50434435050017050 FERRIS ANNA H ERIC ZOBLER ET AL TR TITL HLDR       79,875.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     339800 
50434435050017060 PLUMMER SHAHNAZ & PLUMMER RONALD A       333,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     333500 
50434435050017070 PANFEL RITA        89,304.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1973   1384     327200 
50434435050018010 SPILKER MARC A        741,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 8010 0400 CONDO 1973   2766     741300 
50434435050018020 APPLE PETER G        92,484.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 8020 0400 CONDO 1973   1229     485400 
50434435050018030 DEVELLIS COSMO C & DEVELLIS SUSAN       512,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 8030 0400 CONDO 1973   1537     512700 
50434435050018040 NICOLL MICHAEL & NICOLL LINDA       326,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 8040 0400 CONDO 1973   1235     326700 
50434435050018050 COLBY MELVYN J        349,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 8050 0400 CONDO 1973   1457     349800 
50434435050018060 SCHOLL THEODORE        232,252.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443505 CLARIDGES I CONDO 8060 0400 CONDO 1973   1410     343500 
50434435060001080 CONSTANTOURIS DINOS        179,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1973   1472     179550 
50434435060001090 BRINAS ADA        52,847.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1090 0400 CONDO 1973   1176     173250 
50434435060001100 KELLMAN M & SANDRA J        179,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1100 0400 CONDO 1973   1437     179550 
50434435060001110 PONZIO VINCENT J & PONZIO ANGELA M       108,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1110 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     158550 
50434435060001120 TREVATHAN ENNA E & TREVATHAN TERRY N       287,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1120 0400 CONDO 1973   2000     287700 
50434435060001140 ALVAREZ ORENTINO        69,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1140 0400 CONDO 1973    709     119700 
50434435060001150 RODRIGUEZ LYDIA        163,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1150 0400 CONDO 1973   1420     163800 
50434435060001160 SAMI GAMAL JIM &        170,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 1160 0400 CONDO 1973   1239     170100 
50434435060002080 SECORD WAYNE C & WAYNE C SECORD TR HLDR       72,716.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1973   1472     221550 
50434435060002090 FORSTRAT INTERNATIONAL INC        215,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2090 0400 CONDO 1973   1176     215250 
50434435060002100 WOOCHER SYLVIA        225,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2100 0400 CONDO 1973   1437     225750 
50434435060002110 LEVI INGRID        57,022.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2110 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     200550 
50434435060002120 SMITHLINE CLARICE S EST        208,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2120 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     208950 
50434435060002140 MASTRANTONI ARMANDO & ANTONIA        224,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2140 0400 CONDO 1973   1402     224700 
50434435060002150 MENSCH JUDITH K        57,522.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2150 0400 CONDO 1973   1420     205800 
50434435060002160 DINATALE CARMELA        212,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 2160 0400 CONDO 1973   1239     212100 
50434435060003080 MATWAY LISA        146,008.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1973   1472     231550 
50434435060003090 SQUILLACIOTI TAMARA        51,199.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3090 0400 CONDO 1973   1176     225250 
50434435060003100 COOPERSMITH GERTRUDE        58,412.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3100 0400 CONDO 1973   1437     235750 
50434435060003110 FLAXMAN RICHARD &        210,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3110 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     210550 
50434435060003120 RICH MURRAY & NOREEN        218,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3120 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     218950 
50434435060003140 KALMUS MICHAEL & KALMUS BARBARA       234,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3140 0400 CONDO 1973   1402     234700 
50434435060003150 OLIVERI FILADELFIO & OLIVERI ROSALIA       57,912.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3150 0400 CONDO 1973   1420     215800 
50434435060003160 GOLDFARB NOEL & GOLDFARB CHERYL       210,995.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 3160 0400 CONDO 1973   1239     210995 
50434435060004080 SACHS BARBARA &        191,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1973   1472     241550 
50434435060004090 CATALANO JANET &        235,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4090 0400 CONDO 1973   1176     235250 
50434435060004100 WHITMIRE MICHAEL & KING ROBERT       245,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4100 0400 CONDO 1973   1437     245750 
50434435060004110 JANUSKA TRACY ANN        220,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4110 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     220550 
50434435060004120 BERNHEIM LORRAINE        178,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4120 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     228950 
50434435060004140 DEVELLIS COSMO &        244,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4140 0400 CONDO 1973   1402     244700 
50434435060004150 SHAPIRO EDWARD EST        58,885.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4150 0400 CONDO 1973   1420     225800 
50434435060004160 PALM VENTURE LLC        232,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 4160 0400 CONDO 1973   1239     232100 
50434435060005080 HADGIGEORGE STEFANOS STEFANOS HADGIGEORGE ET AL TR HLDRS       201,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1973   1472     251550 
50434435060005090 OMEALLY FRANKIE        245,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5090 0400 CONDO 1973   1176     245250 
50434435060005100 MARTIN WILLIAM E & MARTIN DIANNE       255,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5100 0400 CONDO 1973   1437     255750 
50434435060005110 ROSANO LORENZO & ROSANO CAMILLE       230,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5110 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     230550 
50434435060005120 JAFINE SUZY TR        238,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5120 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     238950 
50434435060005140 KORN MARIA MARIA KORN TR HLDR       58,862.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5140 0400 CONDO 1973   1402     254700 
50434435060005150 DENNIS STANLEY & LAVIE RENA       235,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5150 0400 CONDO 1973   1420     235800 
50434435060005160 GUMER JULIA        55,417.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 5160 0400 CONDO 1973   1239     242100 
50434435060006080 DESALVO JOSEPH A DESALVO JOSEPH A TR       211,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1973   1472     261550 
50434435060006090 DESKIN BETTY        255,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6090 0400 CONDO 1973   1176     255250 
50434435060006100 CHASER CONRAD & BETTY        265,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6100 0400 CONDO 1973   1437     265750 
50434435060006110 VALENTINE SHIRLEY VALENTINE SHIRLEY TR       102,437.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6110 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     240550 
50434435060006120 KOBLENTZ HARVEY & HARVEY KOBLENTZ & MARIA TUCKER TRS HLDR       198,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6120 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     248950 
50434435060006140 GROSS EDWARD & IRENE GROSS IRENE       59,836.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6140 0400 CONDO 1973   1402     264700 
50434435060006150 MARKMAN ERWIN & BEBE L        245,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6150 0400 CONDO 1973   1420     245800 
50434435060006160 RAJAN ASH &        252,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 6160 0400 CONDO 1973   1239     252100 
50434435060007080 PELLERIN RENE TR & PELLERIN DENISE P TR       271,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1973   1472     271550 
50434435060007090 ADAMOPOULOS ELIAS & STELLA        265,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7090 0400 CONDO 1973   1176     265250 
50434435060007100 CURDGEL ROBERT &        275,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7100 0400 CONDO 1973   1437     275750 
50434435060007110 BYERS DENISE M        250,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7110 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     250550 
50434435060007120 ANTLER GEORGE & GEORGE ANTLER ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       162,808.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7120 0400 CONDO 1973   1416     258950 
50434435060007140 LASSER GAIL        274,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7140 0400 CONDO 1973   1402     274700 
50434435060007150 BAUM MILTON & SELMA BAUM SELMA       55,310.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7150 0400 CONDO 1973   1420     255800 
50434435060007160 RUBIN LOTTI        212,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443506 CLARIDGES II CONDO 7160 0400 CONDO 1973   1239     262100 
50434435130010011 PRENSKY ABE & ABE PRENSKY ET AL TR HLDRS       155,440.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0011 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     277200 
50434435130010012 SANTACROCE MICHAEL J SANTACROCE MICHAEL J TR       209,529.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0012 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     438900 
50434435130010013 MILLER JAMES D        343,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0013 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     343350 
50434435130010014 SONG KENNETH C & PARK ANNA S       539,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0014 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     539700 
50434435130010015 CORRADO NANCY        374,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0015 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     374850 
50434435130010021 BROMBERG FRED & ROSLYN        382,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0021 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     382200 
50434435130010022 CORTESE JOHN        543,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0022 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     543900 
50434435130010023 OMALLEY RONALD J & OMALLEY VIOLA M       448,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0023 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     448350 
50434435130010024 JOFFE MARK & JOFFE ARLYNN       670,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0024 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     670950 
50434435130010025 PETTIE PETER F JR        456,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0025 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     506100 
50434435130010026 OLONNE INVSTMNT INTERNATIONAL        638,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0026 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     638400 
50434435130010027 STEPANIAN DEANNA STEPANIAN DEANNA TR       254,234.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0027 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     428400 
50434435130010028 LEVANTINO PETER J & LEVANTINO LORI       454,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0028 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     454650 
50434435130010031 SCHARAGA STUART L & SCHARAGA JOAN B       342,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0031 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     392200 
50434435130010032 KATZEN CYRUS        553,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0032 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     553900 
50434435130010033 KUYKENDALL C H & CAROLE D KUYKENDALL CAROLE D       207,940.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0033 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     458350 
50434435130010034 7010362 CANADA INC        690,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0034 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     690950 
50434435130010035 YVAN ALLAIRE ET ASSOC INC        526,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0035 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     526100 
50434435130010036 LEWIN BENJAMIN & LEWIN GERALDINE K       648,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0036 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     648400 
50434435130010037 LAVOY EARL P        438,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0037 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     438400 
50434435130010038 BINDMAN ARTHUR J & BERNICE L BINDMAN TRS H/W       269,703.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0038 0400 CONDO 1984   2119     464650 
50434435130010041 LARUCCIA A PAUL & LARUCCIA SANTA       402,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0041 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     402200 
50434435130010042 TANENBAUM JOSEPH & TANENBAUM BERNICE       563,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0042 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     563900 
50434435130010043 SPENSER RALPH RALPH SPENSER TR TITL HLDR       418,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0043 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     468350 
50434435130010044 GRANOWITZ SAMUEL P        660,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0044 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     710950 
50434435130010045 JARNUSZKIEWICZ AGNES        546,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0045 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     546100 
50434435130010046 GLADSTONE TED S GLADSTON DEV CORP C/O       658,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0046 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     658400 
50434435130010047 KUSSELL SARA F TR        448,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0047 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     448400 
50434435130010048 LARUCCIA A PAUL        474,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0048 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     474650 
50434435130010051 HERTZBERG ANNE S TR & HERTZBERG RICHARD H TR       412,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0051 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     412200 
50434435130010052 JOHNS MICHAEL K TR        573,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0052 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     573900 
50434435130010053 GORDON LEONARD & EDITH        478,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0053 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     478350 
50434435130010054 JOELSON BLANCHE JOELSON BLANCHE TR       730,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0054 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     730950 
50434435130010055 TEMKIN LAURA &  WALLACE MASON C/O       566,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0055 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     566100 
50434435130010056 ROSS MICHAEL L        668,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0056 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     668400 
50434435130010057 FISCHER KATHRYN S        216,220.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0057 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     458400 
50434435130010058 HATKOFF DORIS W EST CRAIG HATKOFF, PR C/O       484,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0058 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     484650 
50434435130010061 MASSA ELAINE & MASSA PETER       364,308.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0061 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     422200 
50434435130010062 ORNSTEEN ARLENE TR & ORNSTEEN ALAN C TR       583,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0062 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     583900 
50434435130010063 COOPER LEONARD TR COOPER JOAN TR       488,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0063 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     488350 
50434435130010064 BATOFF WILLIAM W & BATOFF BEVERLY C       750,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0064 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     750950 
50434435130010065 PINCUS HANNAH EST        586,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0065 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     586100 
50434435130010066 SHAPIRO HARRIS & SHIRLEY        678,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0066 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     678400 
50434435130010067 OJA THURE M & OJA IRJA E       468,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0067 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     468400 
50434435130010068 WAGNER RHODA WAGNER RHODA TR       288,928.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0068 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     494650 
50434435130010071 GALIARDO JOHN W &        432,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0071 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     432200 
50434435130010072 COLASANTI PATRICIA TR        593,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0072 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     593900 
50434435130010073 MITTELMAN GEORGIA        448,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0073 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     498350 
50434435130010074 GALIARDO JOHN W &        720,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0074 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     770950 
50434435130010075 VESTEVICH PETER & ANNA C        606,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0075 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     606100 
50434435130010076 HECKTOR PETER & HEIDI        688,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0076 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     688400 
50434435130010077 LOCKARD LARRY G & LOCKARD MARY B       478,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0077 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     478400 
50434435130010078 STERN RUTH E STERN RUTH E TR       269,092.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0078 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     504650 
50434435130020014 GELLER LEONARD & ROSALIE GELLER ROSALIE       265,177.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0014 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     539700 
50434435130020015 MASCOTT FLORENCE E MASCOTT ROBERT A       75,605.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0015 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     275100 
50434435130020016 BARBER STEVEN &        507,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0016 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     507150 
50434435130020017 CAPLAN ADELE        272,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0017 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     323400 
50434435130020018 FREEDMAN ALBERT & ELAINE TRS        349,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0018 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     349650 
50434435130020021 ROSNER CHARLES & ROSNER ELEANOR       382,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0021 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     382200 
50434435130020022 BECKER SHIRLEY        291,218.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0022 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     543900 
50434435130020023 SPIEGEL CAROL J SPIEGEL CAROL J TR       206,339.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0023 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     448350 
50434435130020024 LEVIN CORINNE        620,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0024 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     670950 
50434435130020025 LES PLACEMENTS G G SAUVE INC        506,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0025 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     506100 
50434435130020026 TAAMSAAR ALDO        638,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0026 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     638400 
50434435130020027 NOIRET SVC INC % HERMAN EISER        428,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0027 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     428400 
50434435130020028 KOSBERG CAROL        268,103.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0028 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     454650 
50434435130020031 HERRIS IRVING & VIRGINIA VIRGINIA HERRIS       178,709.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0031 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     392200 
50434435130020032 KURTIS JONATHAN B &        553,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0032 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     553900 
50434435130020033 KYRIAZIS JOHN &        458,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0033 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     458350 
50434435130020034 HERMAN ROBERT & HERMAN SUSAN       433,851.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0034 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     690950 
50434435130020035 MADDEN THOMAS J & T J & ANGELA MADDEN TR HLDR       526,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0035 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     526100 
50434435130020036 GERSHEN ALVIN E & MILDRED B        648,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0036 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     648400 
50434435130020037 KANNER ALLAN        438,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0037 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     438400 
50434435130020038 RUBIN DAVID T & DAVID RUBIN TR TITL HLDR       414,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0038 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     464650 
50434435130020041 SCHWARTZAPFEL MARIE L & SCHWARTZAPFEL LEE A       402,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0041 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     402200 
50434435130020042 STERNFELD KENNETH        342,690.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0042 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     563900 
50434435130020043 WINTERSTEIN FRANCES        468,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0043 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     468350 
50434435130020044 WATT ANN L TR        710,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0044 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     710950 
50434435130020045 BARNETT MARILYN        546,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0045 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     546100 
50434435130020046 CHANKOWSKY MARVIN & CHANKOWSKY MONA       658,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0046 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     658400 
50434435130020047 PLUNKETT JOHN T & DOROTHY T        448,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0047 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     448400 
50434435130020048 ROSNER GERTRUDE & ROSNER FRANCIS       474,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0048 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     474650 
50434435130020051 FORD JOSEPH A SR & FORD PATRICIA       412,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0051 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     412200 
50434435130020052 TEDESCO MARK TRUST        573,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0052 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     573900 
50434435130020053 GORDON ROBERT A TR        478,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0053 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     478350 
50434435130020054 BONNER JACK & SANDY        730,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0054 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     730950 
50434435130020055 HARTMAN GERALDINE & DIDONATO JOSEPH G       566,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0055 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     566100 
50434435130020056 MASON DAVID &        668,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0056 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     668400 
50434435130020057 4496248 CANADA INC        458,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0057 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     458400 
50434435130020058 SCHRECKINGER BARBARA        271,905.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0058 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     484650 
50434435130020061 CRESPI MARION CRESPI ELISSA       422,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0061 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     422200 
50434435130020062 LANCE LISA K        443,940.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0062 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     583900 
50434435130020063 GIUNTA PHILIP        488,350.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0063 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     488350 
50434435130020064 LANCE JOHN LANCE COLLEEN       750,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0064 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     750950 
50434435130020065 MESOLOGITES PETER & KATHY        586,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0065 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     586100 
50434435130020066 TELEGENIC PROGRAMS INC        678,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0066 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     678400 
50434435130020067 BELLI VAHIT &        468,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0067 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     468400 
50434435130020068 HERRMANS HAKAN & HERRMANS JOAN M       494,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0068 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     494650 
50434435130020071 ESKOW ROY L & ESKOW JULIE       432,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0071 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     432200 
50434435130020072 WERNER CHARLES P & WERNER SHELBY       593,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0072 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     593900 
50434435130020073 SHAMIE TERRY N        213,443.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0073 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     498350 
50434435130020074 MARCIANO JOHN A MARCIANO DEBORAH J       770,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0074 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     770950 
50434435130020075 DELSPINA ANTHONY & ANTHONY & FRANCES DELSPINA TR TITL HLDR       264,077.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0075 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     606100 
50434435130020076 BERRY RAYMOND L BERRY EILEEN       638,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0076 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     688400 
50434435130020077 CCO ENTERPRISES LTD        478,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0077 0400 CONDO 1979   1740     478400 
50434435130020078 GOLDBERG RITA        269,092.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0078 0400 CONDO 1979   2119     504650 
50434435130030010 SHAPIRO HARRIS & SHIRLEY        17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0010 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130030020 KYRIAZIS JOHN A & KYRIAZIS ANDREE       17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0020 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130030030 ORNSTEEN ARLENE TR & ORNSTEEN ALAN C TR       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0030 0400 CONDO 1984    195      23100 
50434435130030040 ROSS MICHAEL L        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0040 0400 CONDO 1984    195      23100 
50434435130030050 GLADSTONE TED S        26,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0050 0400 CONDO 1984    222      26250 
50434435130030060 CCO ENTERPRISES LTD        26,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0060 0400 CONDO 1984    222      26250 
50434435130030070 TEDESCO MARK TRUST        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0070 0400 CONDO 1984    195      23100 
50434435130030080 OMALLEY RONALD J & OMALLEY VIOLA M       17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0080 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130030090 MEADE BARRON        17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0090 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130030100 CORRADO NANCY        18,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0100 0400 CONDO 1984    158      18900 
50434435130040010 COLASANTI PATRICIA TR        17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0010 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130040020 GALIARDO JOHN W & GALIARDO JOAN D       17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0020 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130040030 JACOBS SIDNEY        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0030 0400 CONDO 1984    195      23100 
50434435130040040 BERRY RAYMOND L TR        26,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0040 0400 CONDO 1984    222      26250 
50434435130040050 KOSBERG CAROL TRUST        26,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0050 0400 CONDO 1984    222      26250 
50434435130040060 SCHRECKINGER BARBARA TR        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0060 0400 CONDO 1984    195      23100 
50434435130040070 HERMAN ROBERT & HERMAN SUSAN       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0070 0400 CONDO 1984    195      23100 
50434435130040080 STERNFELD KENNETH STERNFELD SUSAN       17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0080 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130040090 SPENSER RALPH TRUST SPENSER RALPH TR       17,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0090 0400 CONDO 1984    149      17850 
50434435130040100 KATZEN CYRUS        18,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443513 ATRIUMS OF PALM BEACH I COND 0100 0400 CONDO 1984    158      18900 
50434435150000010 KJELLSTROM PAGE M        544,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     544950 
50434435150000020 FLOURDE GLORIA J TRUST PLOURDE GLORIA J TRUSTEE       544,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     544950 
50434435150000030 FELDMAN RICHARD L & FELDMAN SUSAN       544,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     544950 
50434435150000040 LUPKE GERD LUPKE GUDRUN       544,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     544950 
50434435150000050 KAPLAN GERTRUDE R        147,549.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     544950 
50434435150000060 LORENZEN FRED & JOHANNA LORENZEN JOHANNA       147,549.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     544950 
50434435150000070 LO SCALZO LAWRENCE & CONSTANCE        544,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     544950 
50434435150000080 LECLAIR-ROGERS PAMELA GARDNER E ROGERS TR TITL HLDR       185,146.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     523950 
50434435150000090 AHONEN RAIMO L        185,146.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     523950 
50434435150000100 DIAMOND JEFFREY H & DIAMOND ROBERT S       271,703.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     523950 
50434435150000110 HOFFMAN LAURENCE J TRUST HOFFMAN LAURENCE J TRUSTEE       523,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     523950 
50434435150000120 CONREY RICHARD A        427,920.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     523950 
50434435150000130 CORNELIUS HARRY        185,146.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     523950 
50434435150000140 FURMAN SUSAN        325,161.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     502950 
50434435150000150 STENDER JERALD        502,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     502950 
50434435150000160 OKEEFE JAMES L III        171,239.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0160 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     502950 
50434435150000170 FRANK EHREN J        502,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443515 OCEAN CAY CONDO 0170 0400 CONDO 1979   1478     502950 
50434435180011010 170141 CANADA INC        400,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     414750 
50434435180011020 JUSTIN MGMT CO        603,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     603750 
50434435180011030 KHOSROVANI DANY        479,575.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     603750 
50434435180011040 MALMED CHARLOTTE A        189,239.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     441000 
50434435180011050 FOX ELAINNE B        373,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     373800 
50434435180011060 SANCHEZ JEAN P & SANCHEZ JUDY       325,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     325500 
50434435180011070 ONEIL WILLIAM F & ONEIL GLORIA T       275,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     325500 
50434435180011080 LANDCASTER CORP N V OMAR DEL RIO C/O       373,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     373800 
50434435180012010 STAHLIE JAN H        493,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     493500 
50434435180012020 PEDESTAL INV LTD        708,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     708750 
50434435180012030 KATZ JEAN        708,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     708750 
50434435180012040 ALEXANIAN DAVID C/O ALEX ALEXANIAN       519,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     519750 
50434435180012050 KNORR WILLIAM J        452,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     452550 
50434435180012060 LYNCH DANIEL F &        378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     378000 
50434435180012070 DONOHUE VINCENT & JANET S        378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     378000 
50434435180012080 BALOUN THOMAS J EST C/O VICTORIA BALOUN       452,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     452550 
50434435180013010 SWARTZ STEVEN & RONALD SWARTZ       503,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     503500 
50434435180013020 SPIEGELMAN WILLIAM & SPIEGELMAN BARBARA       338,051.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     728750 
50434435180013030 KUSHNER JAY &        728,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     728750 
50434435180013040 GUGLIELMINI DANIEL & GUGLIELMINI MARLENE       529,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     529750 
50434435180013050 JAY GROUP INC        462,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     462550 
50434435180013060 WEISS MILTON L & WEISS MARCIA M       295,801.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     388000 
50434435180013070 EVANS HUGH E & RUTH L        388,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     388000 
50434435180013080 DRIESSE HENRY J        462,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     462550 
50434435180014010 SCHECHET KENNETH A & KENNETH & SUSAN SCHECHET ET AL TR HLDRS       322,073.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     513500 
50434435180014020 MCCABE ROBERT P        698,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     748750 
50434435180014030 SADOWSKY LESTER & JOAN SADOWSKY TR TITL HLDR       346,040.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     748750 
50434435180014040 HERMAN KENNETH M        489,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     539750 
50434435180014050 ALTERMAN ELIZABETH G TRUST ALTERMAN ELIZABETH G TR       472,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     472550 
50434435180014060 USDAN JEROME INTER VIVOS TRUST HYMAN JORDAN M TR       398,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     398000 
50434435180014070 KORNBLAU DAVID L & AMY C        398,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     398000 
50434435180014080 NEUDORFER RICHARD J TR & NEUDORFER ELINOR TR       315,224.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     472550 
50434435180015010 HOPE WILLIAM & HOPE SHARON C       473,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     523500 
50434435180015020 VELINSKY MILTON B & ANNETTE P VELINSKY ANNETTE P       295,301.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     768750 
50434435180015030 MY FOUR DGHTRS REALTY CORP        768,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     768750 
50434435180015040 STALL BABETTE S        272,384.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     549750 
50434435180015050 LEVY RETA S        202,434.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     482550 
50434435180015060 DAVIS GARY        408,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     408000 
50434435180015070 KORNBLAU HELEN W        408,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     408000 
50434435180015080 ALTIMARI JOHN & ALTIMERI ADELE       482,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     482550 
50434435180016010 SCHWARTZ WILLIAM A & MARLENE J        533,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     533500 
50434435180016020 HUSSEL RUDOLPH A HUSSEL GUNDI       788,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     788750 
50434435180016030 ANTON SUZANNE P        788,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     788750 
50434435180016040 PALOKA GJOK        509,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     559750 
50434435180016050 SISSON PHYLLIS S        492,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     492550 
50434435180016060 BAAL TESHUVA JACOB & AVIVA        418,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     418000 
50434435180016070 CYPRUS ANDREW        418,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     418000 
50434435180016080 ESPOSITO CAROLE        492,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     492550 
50434435180021010 LINET MICHAEL &        378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     378000 
50434435180021020 MANN JAMES L MANN JAMES L TR       553,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     603750 
50434435180021030 COVICH MARION D TRUST ANDELMAN DAVID R TR       603,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     603750 
50434435180021040 ANGOTTI MICHAEL A & ANGOTTI ANN       244,572.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     441000 
50434435180021050 WHITE HARRY R JR HARRY R WHITE JR TR TITL HLDR       323,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     373800 
50434435180021070 FRIED HERMAN & TERRY FRIED TERRY       84,298.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     325500 
50434435180021080 MLADINIC CAROL A ET AL        233,467.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 1080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     337050 
50434435180022010 WILDENBERG MARVIN & HANNA WILDENBERG HANNA       236,643.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     456750 
50434435180022020 WEINBERG MARTIN        708,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     708750 
50434435180022030 COLARDO RICHARD J        708,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     708750 
50434435180022040 LANDO ROBERT N & LANDO PATTI B       203,513.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     519750 
50434435180022050 SHEAR RONALD & FRULA        452,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     452550 
50434435180022060 MONTANARO MICHAEL & WENDY C        378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     378000 
50434435180022070 MELTZER JACK        378,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     378000 
50434435180022080 SPITZER JOSEPH & RITA SPITZER H/W       200,071.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 2080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     415800 
50434435180023010 BACCASH MARK M & BACCASH LINDA G       346,496.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     466750 
50434435180023020 SCHNEIDMAN ARNOLD & HILDA        728,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     728750 
50434435180023030 JARWOOD ASHLEY & MADELINE COLUSSI TRS       728,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     728750 
50434435180023040 KOONIN ARNOLD H & KOONIN GLORIA E       529,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     529750 
50434435180023050 VALLI AMERIGO A & VALLI PAMELA J       462,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     462550 
50434435180023060 RICHER MARCIA RICHER MARCIA TR       94,588.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     388000 
50434435180023070 MERKER NEAL TR        388,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     388000 
50434435180023080 WEISFELD LOLA        425,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 3080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     425800 
50434435180024010 ROTHSCHILD FRED & LIESELOTTE ROTHSCHILD LIESELOTTE       238,779.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     476750 
50434435180024020 KLEIN WERNER & KLEIN ERNA       748,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     748750 
50434435180024030 DAVIS ROBERTA M        314,134.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     748750 
50434435180024040 JUSTIN ZOLTAN & JUSTIN  KITTY       489,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     539750 
50434435180024050 ROZA KLARA        422,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     472550 
50434435180024060 PALMER NICK T PALMER NICK T TR       152,189.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     398000 
50434435180024070 LAPIN SHIRLEY        95,739.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     398000 
50434435180024080 JACKSON ROBERT L JACKSON JUDITH E       435,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 4080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     435800 
50434435180025010 WEBER CORINNE CORINNE WEBER TR TITL HLDR       239,848.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     486750 
50434435180025020 TUCKER ALLEN & TUCKER CHARLOTTE       718,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     768750 
50434435180025030 ROTHFELD BARBARA TR        768,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     768750 
50434435180025040 SELIN DAVID E BEATRICE L SELIN TRUST       271,884.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     549750 
50434435180025050 SPERBER DONALD & SPERBER KAREN       432,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     482550 
50434435180025060 STERN LEORA R LEORA R STERN TRUST       96,883.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     408000 
50434435180025070 RICH BENNETT I &        408,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     408000 
50434435180025080 KIM YONG HI & KIM SANG YUL       385,690.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 5080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     445800 
50434435180026010 TEPNER HARVEY L        496,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     496750 
50434435180026020 GODEL HOWARD J & GODEL MELINDA S       788,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     788750 
50434435180026030 WOLFE NAOMI TRUST & WOLFE IRVING TRUST B &       788,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     788750 
50434435180026040 SAVOIE PAUL &        559,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     559750 
50434435180026050 DIXON FREDERICK T & DIXON MARTHA F       492,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     492550 
50434435180026060 NICHOLAS KATERINA        418,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     418000 
50434435180026070 ESHAGHIAN DAVID & ESHAGHIAN SIMONE       418,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     418000 
50434435180026080 GREEN HENRY & GREEN JOYCE A       455,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 6080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     455800 
50434435180027010 SCHNEIDER A PETER & SEIGEL DENA       506,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7010 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     506750 
50434435180027020 TABAS EVELYN P        296,369.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7020 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     788750 
50434435180027030 DEBBAS ELIAS H        808,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7030 0400 CONDO 1980   2131     808750 
50434435180027040 GASWORTH KENNETH & GASWORTH DIANNE       274,521.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7040 0400 CONDO 1980   2078     569750 
50434435180027050 PERELMAN MARK TR EST C/O NANCY P SONDOW, TRUSTEE       502,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7050 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     502550 
50434435180027060 KAHAN JANE G        428,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7060 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     428000 
50434435180027070 PILSON NEAL H & PILSON FRIEDA R       428,000.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7070 0400 CONDO 1980   1458     428000 
50434435180027080 BICKEL PETER &        465,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443518 HALCYON OF PALM BEACH CONDO 7080 0400 CONDO 1980   1886     465800 
50434435190010011 DINKIN ARTHUR S DINKIN ARTHUR S TR       198,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0011 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     248850 
50434435190010012 KURTIS ARLENE ARLENE KURTIS TR TITL HLDR       161,699.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0012 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     342300 
50434435190010013 SCHAFFER MATILDE J TRUST        350,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0013 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     350700 
50434435190010014 BRENZEL LAWRENCE A LIMITED        346,500.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     346500 
50434435190010015 BARTKOWICZ WILLIAM &        233,049.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     368550 
50434435190010021 LIOZ MICHAEL & LIOZ CAROL R       324,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     374850 
50434435190010022 BLOOM MARK        417,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     417300 
50434435190010023 ARCA CORP NV MARIE JOSE DUVAL C/O       476,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     476700 
50434435190010024 SUSSMAN RICHARD & LOIS SUSSMAN LOIS       333,243.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     666750 
50434435190010025 RACHINS RICHARD S & RICHARD & ARLENE RACHINS ET AL TR HLDRS       204,392.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     536550 
50434435190010026 SPATZ WENDY        582,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     582750 
50434435190010027 MATES DONALD & MATES MARY       0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0027 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     421050 
50434435190010028 AHO ARDELLE        391,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0028 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     391650 
50434435190010031 SHAHIN RIAD M        389,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     389850 
50434435190010032 HIGGINS CORNELIUS & HIGGINS PATRICIA       468,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     468300 
50434435190010033 WAXMAN MARK Z WAXMAN MARK Z  TR       149,851.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     491700 
50434435190010034 MONDOR BERNARD G MONDOR MADELEINE J       354,337.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     691750 
50434435190010035 FIASSE CHRISTIAN & FIASSE MARIA       561,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     561550 
50434435190010036 MCDERMOTT DARIAN        597,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     597750 
50434435190010037 ATAMAN AYSE B        436,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0037 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     436050 
50434435190010038 SCHECHTER GLADYS        406,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0038 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     406650 
50434435190010041 AMEDEO RAYMOND & AMEDEO PENNY B       404,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     404850 
50434435190010042 ROSS ROSEMARY J TR        277,909.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     483300 
50434435190010043 WEINER BENJAMIN &        456,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     506700 
50434435190010044 EL-DABH ASHRAF H &        716,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     716750 
50434435190010045 BARON ANGELA S        586,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     586550 
50434435190010046 ATAMAN URAL & ATAMAN BELMA       612,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     612750 
50434435190010047 AWADALLA SAMIRA TR        451,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0047 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     451050 
50434435190010048 CORBER MARVIN & HARRIET        421,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0048 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     421650 
50434435190010051 HO CYNTHIA P        137,003.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     419850 
50434435190010052 GREEN RONALD M        448,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     498300 
50434435190010053 LEVINE SHELDON W & PAULA        521,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     521700 
50434435190010054 SAVAGE HOWARD S & SAVAGE FLORENCE       356,539.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     741750 
50434435190010055 KESS GERALD H TR & KESS KATHLEEN F TR       207,694.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     611550 
50434435190010056 FREIDUS CORA        627,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     627750 
50434435190010057 FRALEY ELWIN E FRALEY JEANNE E       211,792.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0057 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     466050 
50434435190010058 ROMANOW GAIL        436,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0058 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     436650 
50434435190010061 BOLONKIN IDA        138,103.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     434850 
50434435190010062 HUNEGS STEVEN M TR &        513,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     513300 
50434435190010063 CHINERY EUGENE W & CHINERY DENISE A       536,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     536700 
50434435190010064 HFS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST SCHIEDT HEIDEMARIE TRUSTEE &       766,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     766750 
50434435190010065 CHASE STANLEY        636,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0065 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     636550 
50434435190010066 BONANNO CHARLES D TR        486,501.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0066 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     642750 
50434435190010067 THOMPSON SCOTT D ET AL TRS        481,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0067 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     481050 
50434435190010068 LEWIN HARRY M        247,566.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0068 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     451650 
50434435190020014 NEITLICH DAVID E &        447,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0014 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     497700 
50434435190020015 GROSS HAROLD TR        311,775.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0015 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     368550 
50434435190020016 CONNELL WILLIAM T & CONNELL HONOR M       456,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0016 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     456750 
50434435190020017 MORRIS JULIA R        287,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0017 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     337050 
50434435190020018 COHEN HERMAN & COHEN SANDRA J       177,900.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0018 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     265650 
50434435190020021 MAHLOWITZ MARJORY        133,699.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0021 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     374850 
50434435190020022 KLEIN BARBARA        417,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0022 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     417300 
50434435190020023 ANDERSON JUDITH C        476,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0023 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     476700 
50434435190020024 SCHWARTZ HARVEY S &        333,243.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0024 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     666750 
50434435190020025 NANCY MEDLINSKY ALEXANDER TR MEDLINSKY MARK ALPERIN TR       486,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0025 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     536550 
50434435190020026 SMITH BENTLEY L        582,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0026 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     582750 
50434435190020027 PAPAPATERAS KONSTANTIA E        421,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0027 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     421050 
50434435190020028 MARDER MYRON D & MARDER RUTH L       243,162.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0028 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     391650 
50434435190020031 HOLTZMAN ROBERT & MARY        389,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0031 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     389850 
50434435190020032 GREENBERG MADELYN GREENBERG MADELYN TR       268,479.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0032 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     468300 
50434435190020033 MATHYS MARY A        491,700.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0033 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     491700 
50434435190020034 THOMASHOWER ROSALIE        641,250.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0034 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     691750 
50434435190020035 GOLIMBU ALEXANDER N TR & NAGARAJ IRENE G TR       561,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0035 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     561550 
50434435190020036 VOGEL JAMES E & VOGEL DIANE M       597,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0036 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     597750 
50434435190020037 MURPHY JOHN E III        436,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0037 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     436050 
50434435190020038 KATZ STEVEN A & KATZ MARGARET M       406,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0038 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     406650 
50434435190020041 HALARIS ANGELOS        404,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0041 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     404850 
50434435190020042 BISSINGER CHARLES C        269,081.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0042 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     483300 
50434435190020043 NEIPRIS JOSEPH & MIRIAM NEIPRIS MIRIAM       146,019.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0043 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     506700 
50434435190020044 BARSOUM SHADIA D TRUST BARSOUM SHADIA D TR       716,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0044 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     716750 
50434435190020045 DORSKY ALVIN H & CLAIRE S        586,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0045 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     586550 
50434435190020046 BOMBART LOUIS & BOMBART ROSALYN       612,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0046 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     612750 
50434435190020047 TIILIKAINEN PIRKKO        401,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0047 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     451050 
50434435190020048 PICOV NORMAN N        421,650.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0048 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     421650 
50434435190020051 GAREAU RAYMOND & GISELE        419,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0051 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     419850 
50434435190020052 KORNGOLD LEON & SYLVIA KORNGOLD SYLVIA       270,680.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0052 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     498300 
50434435190020053 GOLDBERG LARRY R & IRIS D IRIS D GOLDBERG       152,189.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0053 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     521700 
50434435190020054 HOWARD ROGER & HOWARD JULIE       691,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0054 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     741750 
50434435190020055 FLYNN ROBERT E TR & FLYNN IRENE P TR       611,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0055 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     611550 
50434435190020056 ANDREWS BARBARA F        322,880.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0056 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     627750 
50434435190020057 ULLOA ROLAND A        466,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0057 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     466050 
50434435190020058 PERLIN LEON H & LEON PERLIN ET AL TR TITL HLDRS       246,465.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0058 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     436650 
50434435190020061 HAN CLARA K HAN CLARA K TR       384,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0061 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     434850 
50434435190020062 ATHANS MICHAEL MICHAEL ATHANS TR TITL HLDR       463,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0062 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     513300 
50434435190020063 MANISTA STANELY F & MANISTA IRENE       0.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0063 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     536700 
50434435190020064 HASSAN SHAWKY A & FIKRIA E        766,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0064 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     766750 
50434435190020065 FRANK HOFFER HOLDING LTD        636,550.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0065 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     636550 
50434435190020066 LIPNER NIRA        592,750.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0066 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     642750 
50434435190020067 129 31 HARRISON STREET LLC        481,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0067 0400 CONDO 1980   1740     481050 
50434435190020068 COFFMAN RICHARD A & MIRIAM N COFFMAN MIRIAM N       247,566.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0068 0400 CONDO 1980   2119     451650 
50434435190030010 MATES DONALD & MARY        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190030020 HUNEGS CAROLYN TR &        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190030030 AHO ARDELLE        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190030040 KORNGOLD LEON & SYLVIA        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190030050 EL-DABH ASHRAF H & EL-DABH MERVAT       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190030060 SCHWARTZ HARVEY S & SCHWARTZ ELAINE R       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190030070 BISSINGER CHARLES C JR TR        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190030080 MCDERMOTT DARIAN        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190030090 SAVAGE HOWARD S & FLORENCE        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190030100 GOLIMBU CORNELIA        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190040010 FIASSE CHRISTIAN & FIASSE MARIA       22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190040020 GREEN RONALD M        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190040030 CHINERY EUGENE &        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190040040 COFFMAN RICHARD A & MIRIAM N        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190040050 COHEN HERMAN & COHEN SANDRA J       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190040060 HOWARD ROGER & HOWARD JULIE       23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190040070 ANDREWS BARBARA F        23,100.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1980      0      23100 
50434435190040080 KURTIS ARLENE        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190040090 MARDER MYRON D & RUTH L        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435190040100 BONANNO CHARLES D TR        22,050.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443519 THIRTY THREE SIXTY CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1980      0      22050 
50434435240001030 PETERSON ROBERT A & PETERSON CINDY J       373,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 1030 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     423150 
50434435240001040 ADLER ESTELLE ADLER ESTELLE TR       363,200.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 1040 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     413700 
50434435240001050 JAROTSKI KATHY R & JAROTSKI JAMES W       300,300.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 1050 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     300300 
50434435240002010 SCHEIMAN F B & ANJETTE L SCHEIMAN ANJETTE L       236,571.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 2010 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     479850 
50434435240002020 MAGARIAN PHYLLIS        171,557.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 2020 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     362250 
50434435240002030 TRONFELD JAY &        554,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 2030 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     554400 
50434435240002040 WEISZ LAURENCE        544,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 2040 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     544950 
50434435240002050 HACK MARTIN &        302,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 2050 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     352800 
50434435240002060 SIEGEL RALPH & SARA L        470,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 2060 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     470400 
50434435240003010 GAUTIERI VITO J &        489,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 3010 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     489850 
50434435240003020 ROTHSTEIN MURRAY A        305,087.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 3020 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     372250 
50434435240003030 SPIEGEL JOSEPH M & CYNTHIA        574,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 3030 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     574400 
50434435240003040 FLEUR LEONA        265,788.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 3040 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     564950 
50434435240003050 MARTINEZ PETER & BACCASINI ALFREDO       362,800.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 3050 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     362800 
50434435240003060 MOLINA OSCAR M &        480,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 3060 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     480400 
50434435240004010 RUDIN ALICE        247,757.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 4010 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     499850 
50434435240004020 POLLEY ALICE A        183,244.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 4020 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     382250 
50434435240004030 FATA SANTO A &        594,400.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 4030 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     594400 
50434435240004040 SIEGEL VICTOR & BEATRICE SIEGEL BEATRICE       271,631.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 4040 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     584950 
50434435240004050 WIDOME SUGAR FAY B ET AL        136,495.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 4050 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     372800 
50434435240004060 ARTUSO VINCENT & ARTUSO JOHN       242,413.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 4060 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     490400 
50434435240005010 BRINKER ERIC B        509,850.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 5010 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     509850 
50434435240005020 WEINSTEIN HERBERT & AUDREY WEINSTEIN AUDREY       189,586.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 5020 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     392250 
50434435240005030 ARONSON ROBERT S & JOAN ARONSON JOAN       283,319.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 5030 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     614400 
50434435240005040 WEISSMAN SEYMOUR & WEISSMAN JEANETTE W       604,950.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 5040 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     604950 
50434435240005050 GEHMAN FRANCIS H GEHMAN PATRICIA A       142,838.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 5050 0400 CONDO 1982   1714     382800 
50434435240005060 KLAVANS DANIEL J & HELENE KLAVANS HELENE       248,257.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 5060 0400 CONDO 1982   2145     500400 
50434435240010010 ARONSON ROBERT S TR        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0010 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010020 SPIEGEL JOSEPH M & CYNTHIA        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0020 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010030 ARTUSO VINCENT & ARTUSO JOHN       24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0030 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010040 KLAVANS DANIEL J & HELENE        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0040 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010050 ADLER ESTELLE TRUST ADLER ESTELLE TRUSTEE       24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0050 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010060 MOLINA OSCAR M & MOLINA MARIA J       24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0060 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010070 SUGAR SAMUEL & SUGAR FAYE       24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0070 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010080 SIEGEL RALPH & SARA L        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0080 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010090 RUDIN FRED D & ALICE        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0090 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010100 SCHEIMAN F B & ANJETTE L        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0100 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010110 FLEUR LEO & FLEUR LEONA       24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0110 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010120 BRINKER ERIC B        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0120 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010130 WEINSTEIN HERBERT & AUDREY        24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0130 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010140 WEISSMAN SEYMOUR & WEISSMAN JEANETTE W       24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0140 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 
50434435240010150 SIEGEL VICTOR & SIEGEL BEATRICE       24,150.00 0 CONDOMINIUM                   5043443524 EMERAUDE CONDO 0150 0400 CONDO 1982      0      24150 

"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019288.txt,"BREAKING DOWN DEMOCRACY: Goals, Strategies, and Methods of Modern Authoritarians

of criticism in the media to justify a tenuous claim
of pluralism. In recent years, tolerance for ideas
and opinions that are not aligned with those of
the regime has steadily eroded. In Russia, a bad
situation became much worse after the invasion
of Ukraine in 2014. Those who criticized or even
raised questions about the morality or wisdom of
the Kremlin's actions were persecuted, dismissed
from employment, and banned from media com-
mentary. Putin also expanded the zone of media
control from the mainstream television and print
sectors to the internet.

In Venezuela, one opposition or independent
voice after another has been neutralized, as key
newspapers and television stations were sold,
under duress, to businessmen with ties to the
government. The new and often opaque owners
generally watered down political reporting and
forced out prominent journalists.’

Even before the 2016 coup attempt, media free-
dom in Turkey was deteriorating at an alarming
rate. The government, controlled by President
Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Develop-
ment Party, aggressively used the penal code,
criminal defamation legislation, and antiterror-
ism laws to punish critical reporting. Journal-
ists also faced growing violence, harassment,
and intimidation from both state and nonstate
actors. The authorities also used financial and
administrative leverage over media owners to
influence coverage and muzzle dissent.’

War propaganda: For some time, propaganda
from Russia, China, and other authoritarian
countries stressed a hostility toward liberal val-
ues and democracy, framed around a relentless
anti-Americanism. There were, however, certain
redlines that propagandists were unlikely to
cross. They would criticize American foreign
policy and blame it for a country’s problems.

But only rarely would they accuse Washington
of warlike intentions, and they seldom if ever
made military threats themselves. Since the
invasion of Ukraine and the resulting economic
sanctions imposed by the United States and the
EU, Russian propaganda has assumed an uglier,
more menacing tone. The same Is true in China,
where official expressions of hostility toward the
United States and “Western” democratic values
intensified—indeed took on a histrionic and
belligerent character—after the ascension of Xi

Jinping as Communist Party leader. In Turkey,
progovernment commentators have accused
the U.S. government and even an American
think tank of involvement in the failed coup of
2016. °

Closing doors to the outside world: More

than anything else, modern authoritarianism is
distinguished from traditional autocracy by its
openness to relatively normal relations with the
outside world. China, for example, long sought
to balance calibrated repression at home with
participation in an impressive array of global in-
stitutions. Beijing welcomed the establishment
of local branches of foreign, mostly American,
universities, joint research ventures with foreign
scholars, and even the involvement of foreign
NGOs in areas such as legal reform and envi-
ronmental conservation. While more ambiv-
alent about the international media, Chinese
authorities did give unprecedented freedom of
movement to foreign journalists in the period
surrounding the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Russia
was less welcoming to foreign involvement in
the country, whether by governmental or private
entities, but for a time it maintained academic
exchanges with the United States and European
countries, grudgingly tolerated foreign NGOs,
and took some pride in the freedom of Russians
to travel freely abroad.

Conditions have deteriorated over the past
several years. In Russia, the government re-
duced trade with Europe in response to sanc-
tions, imposed travel restrictions on millions of
public-sector employees, smeared domestic
human rights organizations as “foreign agents”
for accepting international funding, and began
blacklisting foreign NGOs as “undesirable.” Chi-
na has increased regulatory and legal pressure
on foreign companies, bullied foreign countries
into repatriating Chinese political refugees,
significantly increased regulatory restrictions on
foreign NGOs, and sharply curbed journalistic
freedom for foreign correspondents.

Propaganda and official rhetoric in both
countries has increasingly portrayed them as
besieged fortresses, threatened on all sides by
hostile foreign powers, spies, separatists, and
traitors who seek to topple the government and
deny the nation its rightful place in the world. In
this environment, any interaction with foreigners

54

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019288
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029045.txt,"environment. And you've had a fairly good track record. So I don’t want this to kinda
sound namby-pamby, “Let’s all hold hands and sing ‘Kumbaya’ around capitalism.”

But there’s a strand of capitalism today — two strands of it, that are very disturbing.

One is state-sponsored capitalism. And that’s the capitalism you see in China and Russia.
I believe it’s what Holy Father [Pope Francis] has seen for most of his life in places like
Argentina, where you have this kind of crony capitalism of people that are involved with
these military powers-that-be in the government, and it forms a brutal form of capitalism
that is really about creating wealth and creating value for a very small subset of people.
And it doesn’t spread the tremendous value creation throughout broader distribution
patterns that were seen really in the 20th century.

The second form of capitalism that I feel is almost as disturbing, is what I call the Ayn
Rand or the Objectivist School of libertarian capitalism. And, look, I’m a big believer in a
lot of libertarianism. I have many many friends that’s a very big part of the conservative
movement — whether it’s the UKIP movement in England, it’s many of the underpinnings
of the populist movement in Europe, and particularly in the United States.

However, that form of capitalism is quite different when you really look at it to what I call
the “enlightened capitalism” of the Judeo-Christian West. It is a capitalism that really
looks to make people commodities, and to objectify people, and to use them almost — as
many of the precepts of Marx — and that is a form of capitalism, particularly to a younger
generation [that] they’re really finding quite attractive. And if they don’t see another
alternative, it’s going to be an alternative that they gravitate to under this kind of rubric of

“personal freedom.”

“Look at what’s happening in ISIS ... look at
the sophistication of which they’ ve taken the
tools of capitalism ... at what they’ve done
with Twitter and Facebook.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029045
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018828.txt,"Area Analysis 18

The current situation is that the recovering housing market and general economic conditions on the
US mainland is slowly having a positive impact in the US Virgin Islands’ real estate market in terms of
overall average home prices as well as the number of homes sold. Home sales in the territory, while
still lower than 2007 figures, have increased annually since 2012.

According to statistical data provided by the Multiple Listing Service, the value of real estate sales in
the St. Thomas-St. Croix MLS grew by 54% in 2014 to nearly $200 million on 883 transactions; volume
seen since 2008 and sales pace not seen since 2007. This growth follows 20% growth in 2013 which
came after six years of declines. The average sales price surpassed $300,000, a level also not seen
since 2008.

MILS Sales Volume - St. Thomas and St. Croix

$400,000,000 - : $350,000
$340,000

$350,000,000 -

$330,000
_} $320,000
- $310,000
$250,000,000 - $300,000

$300,000,000 -

- $290,000
$280,000
$270,000
$260,000

$100,000,000 - $250,000
2009 2010 = 2011 2012 2013 2014

$200,000,000

$150,000,000

== Sales Volume Average Sale Price

Source: St. Thomas/St. Croix MLS

Real Estate Ownership and Taxation

Ownership is “fee simple”, under the U.S. flag. There are no restrictions against purchasing solely for
investment, and no laws dictating when, if ever, you must build on undeveloped land. It should be
noted that for 2006 there was a reassessment, and the tax rate changed to $3.77 per $1,000 based on
100% of assessed value (for residential property); however, there was an ongoing court challenge to
the reassessment, and a federal injunction blocked tax bills until the issue could be resolved. As of
December, 2013, the 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax bills have all been issued under
the old 1999 assessed values and tax rates. This federal court injunction regarding the tax
reassessment of VI property values had previously prevented the government from collecting property
tax for at least four years, resulting in the government losing USS25 million a month. New assessed
values as well as amended tax rates were released in conjunction with the 2013 tax bills in August,
2014. Subsequent tax bills were issued at a rate of two per year until August 2015 when the 2015 bill
were released and the Virgin Islands became current with respect to its property taxes.

IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018828
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012865.txt,"Chapter 4:
Wicked in waiting

The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they
be born, speaking lies.
— Bible, Psalm 53:8

Growing up is a lottery. No one has a say over their genes or their parents, including the environment that
is created on their behalf. For individuals raised in poverty, abused by parents or abandoned by them,
there may come a time when it is possible to purge the past, rise above it, and lay down new tracks.
Success in this endeavor depends upon biological potential and the environment’s toxicity. Though every
healthy human being acquires the same basic biological ingredients, individual differences in how our
biology expresses itself can either provide immunity against toxic environments or deep vulnerabilities.
The unlucky ones inherit genes that predispose to sensation-seeking and risk-taking, callous and
unemotional attitudes toward others, weak self-control, and narcissistic leanings. With this lottery ticket,
it takes little to trigger the mindset of an evildoer. And yet some resist. An impressive accumulation of
scientific evidence helps explain the source of these individual differences, including its role in sculpting

different personality profiles that either deviate greatly from societal norms or follow them to perfection.

What’s normal?

Much of our fascination with evil stems from the distinct impression that evildoers are anomalies. Their
actions are inhuman, unimaginable, rarely witnessed, and detrimental to our species’ survival. This
impression carries with it an assumption about what is expected or typical of our species, as well as what
is possible. It assumes that evildoers have thoughts, feelings, and desires that fall outside of the repertoire

of an average human being. Their actions are unimaginable because most human minds lack the capacity

Hauser Chapter 4. Wicked in waiting 119

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012865
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033224.txt,"From: Thomas Jr., Landon 
Sent: 2/3/2017 3:43:10 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: I love these Trump suck up guys.... 
Importance: High 
Do you think he gets what he wants? 
https://www.nytimes.com/2o17/02/o2/business/dealbook/an-early-trump-backer-awaits-his-
reward.html? r=o  
Interesting piece on cognitive science/Trump. Right down your alley. 
http://www.bijaadvisors11c.com/trumpfog.html  
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.h  
tml 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033224 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016092.txt,"402

Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?

. Body Language & Banter

Communication Hypothesis} — That face to face communication
is more powerful in some real physical sense than symbolic
communication.

7-38-55 Rule — Mehrabian’s observation that the emotional
content of communication is 7% words, 38% tone of voice and
55% body language.

. The Brain

Penrose-Hameroff Conjecture — Brains are quantum-gravity
computers using tubulin as the mediator.

. Knowledge

Information Continuum Hypothesist — Information is finite,
but understanding and knowledge are different in nature.
Infinite Monkeys Hypothesis — The paradox that says monkeys
could type Hamlet given enough time and paper.

Cat Experimentt — Finding my house cat can use our computer,
and may be more creative than monkeys!

. Kittens & Gorillas

Feynman Proof — A proof that uses the lack of an evolved
species within an evolutionary niche to disprove the existence of
something; in this case polywater.

The Infinity of Primes — Pythagoras’ proof there are an infinity
of prime numbers without needing the concept of a number.

. Complexity & Chaos

The Butterfly Effect — The proposal by Edward Lorenz that tiny
effects can multiply up into enormous results.

P#NP — That non-deterministic polynomial problems can never
be solved in polynomial time and are, therefore, beyond the
capability of any imagined computer.

The Hawking-Bekenstein Turk} — Although there is a perfect
chess machine, it would collapse space-time to a black hole were
it to exist.

.

Continuum Hypothesis — Does anything come between the
first two infinities; counting numbers and the continuum of real
numbers.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016092
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012405.txt,"18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

7

oO fm SN ODO oO Be WwW NY

~0929104. TXT
clear.

MR. TEIN: You want to waste time is what
you want to do. You were supposed to be here this
morning and you totally broke the deal, the
agreement that you had with us if your hearing got
cancel led.

But let's move on and maybe you'll stop

obstructing this deposition.

12

MR. LEOPOLD: | think the record is very
clear where we stand thus far.

Is there a recording taken of this
deposition?

THE COURT REPORTER: Yes.

MR. LEOPOLD: Just make sure that's
preserved.

BY MR. TEIN:

Q. Go to Exhibit 20-01 -- well, before you do

that, i, are you aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey
Herman Filed a lawsuit on your behalf, yes or no?

MR. LEOPOLD: Objection.

Any conversations that you and | have had
regarding that, if that is the only way by which
you understand how to answer that question, so not
answer. It's attorney/client privilege, as wel|
as any conversations you may have had with the
attorney from Miami. That is also attorney/client
privilege. And I'm assuming --

MR. TEIN: You're actually wrong about the
attorney/client privilege.

MR. LEOPOLD: I'm assuming Counsel is not
Page 10

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012405
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023097.txt,"March 13, 2005

FRANK RICH

The Greatest Dirty Joke Ever Told

T was two and half weeks after 9/11 that I heard the dirtiest joke I'd ever heard in my life.
New York was still tossing and turning under its blanket of grief back then. Almost no one
was going out at night to have fun, a word that had been banished from the country's
vocabulary. But desperately sad people will do desperate things. That's my excuse for
making my way with my wife to the Hilton on Sixth Avenue, where the Friars Club was
roasting Hugh Hefner.

Someone had decided that the show must go on. A crowd materialized out of nowhere to
pack a vast ballroom in an otherwise shadowy and deserted Midtown. On the dais were
not only the expected clowns old (Alan King) and young (Jimmy Kimmel) but a surreal
grab bag of celebrities out of Madame Tussauds: Dr. Joyce Brothers, Ice-T, Patty Hearst,
Donald Trump. ""God Bless America"" was sung by Deborah Harry.

The ensuing avalanche of Viagra jokes did not pull off the miracle of making everyone in
the room forget the recent events. Restlessness had long since set in when the last comic
on the bill, Gilbert Gottfried, took the stage. Mr. Gottfried, decked out in preposterously
ill-fitting formal wear, has a manic voice so shrill he makes Jerry Lewis sound like Morgan
Freeman. He grabbed the podium for dear life and started rocking back and forth like a
hyperactive teenager trapped onstage in a school assembly. Soon he delivered what may
have been the first public 9/11 gag: He couldn't get a direct flight to California, he said,
because ""they said they have to stop at the Empire State Building first.""

There were boos, but Mr. Gottfried moved right along to his act's crowning joke. ""A
talent agent is sitting in is office,"" he began. ""A family walks in - a man, woman, two kids,
and their little dog. And the talent agent goes, ""What kind of an act do you do?’ "" What
followed was a marathon description of a vaudeville routine featuring incest, bestiality and
almost every conceivable bodily function. The agent asks the couple the name of their
unusual act, and their answer is the punch line: ""The Aristocrats.""

As the mass exodus began, some people were laughing, others were appalled, and perhaps
a majority of us were in the middle. We knew we had seen something remarkable, not
because the joke was so funny but because it had served as shock therapy, harmless shock
therapy for an adult audience, that at least temporarily relieved us of our burdens and
jolted us back into the land of the living again. Some weeks later Comedy Central would

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023097
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014685.txt,"Case 9:Gase-bd PaevOKS ERM cRegumenhesee of HeGOLINGLE: Ragr/AOiof Ibage 9 of 10

id. at 10). Petitioners do not contend that Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4’s “participation in this
case” can only be achieved by listing them as parties.

As it stands under the original petition, the merits of this case will be decided based on a
determination of whether the Government violated the rights of Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, and all
“other similarly situated victims” under the CVRA. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 may offer
relevant, admissible, and non-cumulative evidence that advances that determination, but their
participation as listed parties is not necessary in that regard. See Herring, 894 F.2d at 1024
(District court did not abuse its discretion by denying amendment where “addition of more
plaintiffs .. . would not have affected the issues underlying the grant of summary judgment.”); cf.
Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under Rule 15, “courts have held
that leave to amend to assert a claim already at issue in [another lawsuit] should not be granted if
the same parties are involved, the same substantive claim is raised, and the same relief is
sought.”)” And, as to Jane Doe 4 at least, adding her as a party raises unnecessary questions
about whether she is a proper party to this action.®

Petitioners also admit that amending the petition to conform to the evidence by
including references to the non-prosecution agreement itself is “unnecessary” as the “existing

petition is broad enough to cover the developing evidence in this case.” (DE 311). The Court

> The Court expresses no opinion at this time whether any of the attestations made by
Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 in support of their motion will be relevant, admissible, and non-
cumulative.

° The Government contends that Jane Doe 4 is not a true “victim” in this case because
she was not known at the time the Government negotiated the non-prosecution agreement, and
accordingly she was not entitled to notification rights under the CVRA. (See DE 290 at 10).
Any “duplicative” litigation filed by Jane Doe 4 would necessarily raise the issue of whether she
has standing under the CVRA under these circumstances.

9

GIUFFRE002852

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014685
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031243.txt,"° She was then approached by a dean at the university, who suspected that she was referring to you,
based on a previously reported incident with another student. He encouraged her to make a complaint, and
she did.

° University investigators interviewed both you and the student.

° On September 4, 2008, Susan Nickel-Schindewolf, the university’s associate vice president for student
affairs, wrote to the student, telling her that the investigation was complete. She wrote that you had been told:
“This type of behavior could constitute sexual harassment in violation of the university’s sexual harassment
policy.”

° The letter also stated that you were prohibited from making contact with the student as long as she
remained at Case.

° The letter also stated that you are required to get approval from the dean or the chair of the physics
department before setting foot on the campus again.

° The letter also stated, “Dr. Krauss expressed regret about having a negative impact on you, and also
his willingness to use this complaint as an opportunity to reflect and improve on his future interactions with
students.”

° By then, you had already left Case, taking up your current position at Arizona State University the
month before.

° “The opportunities being offered at ASU are simply too great to turn down at this stage in my career,”
you told Case colleagues, in an email announcing your departure on April 16, 2008.

Incident 3:

° A former Case Western physics department administrator confirmed that she had reported a previous
incident involving a student who had confided in her about your inappropriate behavior towards her.

Incident 4:

° You met a student from another university, an atheist activist, in March 2008 at the American Atheists
Convention in Minneapolis. She wanted to expand the atheist group she ran at the midwestern university she
was attending, and hoped to convince you to come and speak. You initially seemed enthusiastic.

° During the convention, attendees including you and Richard Dawkins went for dinner with the student
and volunteers for Dawkins’ foundation.

° Afterwards, the student invited you to join the volunteers for a drink.

° You asked her to come get you in your hotel room. She was wary of your intentions, and so brought a
male friend with her. Opening the door to find them both there, you informed her you had decided not to go.
° You met this student again at the American Atheists Convention in Des Moines, lowa, in April 2011.

° You pulled over a chair for her in the bar, and then started running your hand up her leg under the
table.

° She tried to shift her body away from you, and you persisted in putting your hand on her leg. She

crossed her legs, and you kept trying. Then she turned her entire body away.

Incident 5:

° This incident allegedly occurred on in May 2011 on a CFI cruise. We understand that CFI staff were
informed that you had propositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join you and your
female companion for sex in your cabin.

° At least two CFI staffers were sufficiently concerned about reports of your behavior that they urged
CFI’s president not to invite you on a 2014 cruise of the Galapagos Islands. You were invited on that cruise,
however.

Incident 6:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031243
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012411.txt,"o™

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

~0929104. TXT
We're going to talk about that in a second.

Okay.
Did you send that message last week --

Right.

o> o> OS

Let me Finish my question.
Did you send that message last week to a
friend of yours on MySpace?

A. ! wouldn't know the date, but obviously,

19

it's to a friend.

Do you find the term n-i-g-g-e-r offensive?

That's not anywhere in there.

What word did you use in there?

MR. LEOPOLD: Where are you referring to,
Counsel? There's 20 plus words in there.

MR. TEIN: Don't make a speaking objection.

THE WITNESS: Are you referring to
anything --

MR. LEOPOLD: no, i Don't -- don't --
fet him ask you the question.

BY MR. TEIN:

Q. What question were you asking

MR. LEOPOLD: She doesn't ask questions.
You ask the questions. What is the question
pending?

BY MR. TEIN:
Page 16

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012411
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014849.txt,"Case 9:0&aé807E5-d0A07 4 oR nileetinteniteréd-49 FES@ DSGCkét104/P7d ge ofPidge 3 of 10

on the part of the movant, . . . undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the
amendment, [and] futility of amendment.’” Laurie, 256 F.3d at 1274 (quoting Foman v. Davis,
371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the
court must consider “the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits
of a dispute.” 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 1488, p. 814 (3d ed. 2010). Justice does
not require amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will not materially
advance the resolution of the litigation on the merits. See Herring v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 894
F.2d 1020, 1024 (9th Cir. 1989).
A. Rule 21 Motion

Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4’s first attempt to join in this proceeding was brought under
Rule 21. (DE 280). “If parties seek to add a party under Rule 21, courts generally use the
standard of Rule 15, governing amendments to pleadings, to determine whether to allow the
addition.” 12 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P., p. 432 (3d ed. 2013); see also Galustian v.
Peter, 591 F.3d 724, 729-30 (4th Cir. 2010) (collecting cases and noting that Rule 15(a) applies

to amendments seeking to add parties); Frank v. U.S. West, Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1365 (10th Cir.

1993) (“A motion to add a party is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)....”).

Rule 21, “Misjoinder and Non-joinder of Parties,” provides the court with a tool for
correcting the “misjoinder’” of parties that would otherwise result in dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P.
21. Insofar as Rule 21 “relates to the addition of parties, it is intended to permit the bringing in
of a person, who through inadvertence, mistake or for some other reason, had not been made a
party and whose presence as a party is later found necessary or desirable.” United States v. Com.

Bank of N. Am., 31 F.R.D. 133, 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1962) (internal quotation marks omitted).

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014849
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023083.txt,"Table 15: Sensitivity of a company’s domestic earnings

Net exports (% of COGS}
Tax rate -100% -50% 50%
15%
18%
20%
23%
25%
28%
30%
33%
35%
Source: BofAML US Equity & Quant Strategy
*We note that it is unlikely that a company can be a 100% net exporter and have any domestic earnings to begin with.
Note: We assume a company with a 40% gross margin, operating expenses are 20% of sales and an initial tax rate of 35%

100%*

Industry screen: Below we highlight industries which could potentially
benefit most / be hurt most by the BAT.

Chart 15: Industry EPS impact from border

Chart 14: Industry EPS impact from border
adjustment tax (25% rate)

Chart 13: Industry EPS impact from border
adjustment tax (20% rate)

adjustment tax (15% rate)

-100% 50% 0% 50% -150% -100%  -50% 0% 50% -200% -150% -100% -50% 0% 50%
Industrial Conglomerates 5% Industrial Conglomerates 7% Industrial Conglomerates 8%
Life Sciences Tools & Svcs 4% Chemicals 5% Chemicals 6%
Chemicals 4% Life Sciences Tools & Svcs 5% Life Sciences Tools & Svcs 6%
Household Products 3% Household Products 4% Machinery 5%
Machinery 3% Machinery 4% Household Products 5%
Health Care Technology 2% Health Care Technology 3% Health Care Technology 4%
Electrical Equipment 2% Electrical Equipment 3% Electrical Equipment 4%
Media 2% Media 2% Media 3%
IT Sves 1% IT Sves 2% IT Sves 2%
Energy Equipment & Svcs 1% Energy Equipment & Sves 1% Energy Equipment & Svcs 2%
Biotechnology -1% Biotechnology -1% Biotechnology -2%
Semiconductors & Sem Equip -2% Semiconductors & Sem Equip -2% Semiconductors & Sem Equip -3%
Software -2% Software -3% Software -3%
Pharmaceuticals -2% Pharmaceuticals -3% Pharmaceuticals A%
Trading Cos & Distributors -3% Trading Cos & Distributors -3% Trading Cos & Distributors 4%
Health Care Equipment &... -4% Health Care Equipment &... -5% Health Care Equipment &... 6%
Metals & Mining 5% Metals & Mining 7% Electronic Equip Instr &... 8%
Building Products 5% Building Products 7% Metals & Mining -9%
Electronic Equip Instr &... 6% Electronic Equip Instr &... 8% Building Products 0%
Construction Materials 6% Construction Materials 0% Construction Materials -11%
Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels 0% Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels -12% Tech Hardware -14%
Communications Equipment -9% Tech Hardware -12% Oil Gas & Consumable Fuels -15%
Tech Hardware 0% Communications Equipment -12% Communications Equipment 15%
Health Care Providers & Svcs -11% Health Care Providers & Svcs -14% Health Care Providers & Svcs -18%
Household Durables -12% Household Durables -16% Household Durables -20%
Auto Components -20% Auto Components -21% Auto Components -21%
Leisure Products -30% Leisure Products 40% Leisure Products 50%
Specialty Retail -33% Specialty Retail 45% Specialty Retail 56%
Distributors -38% Distributors 51% Distributors 64%
Textiles Apparel & Luxury Goods -30% Textiles Apparel & Luxury Goods 52% Textiles Apparel & Luxury Goods 65%
Internet & Direct Mktg Retail 41% Internet & Direct Mktg Retail 54% Internet & Direct Mktg Retail 68%
Automobiles 41% Automobiles 55% Automobiles -69%
Muttiline Retail -49% Multiline Retail -65% Muttiline Retail 81%
Food & Staples Retailing -74% Food & Staples Retailing Food & Staples Retailing  -124%
25% tax rate

m 15% tax rate

Source: BofAML US Equity & Quant Strategy, FactSet, S&P

20% tax rate

Source: BofAML US Equity & Quant Strategy, FactSet, S&P

Closing loopholes

Both Trump and the Blueprint proposal suggest getting rid of special-interest
deductions and credits that distort capital allocation decisions. The table below lists the
25 biggest US corporate tax breaks. The #1 and #3 “tax breaks” are the deferral of
foreign income and certain foreign financial income, but these would become irrelevant
if the US moves to a territorial tax system, as is being proposed by the Blueprint plan.
Exempting corporations from paying US taxes on foreign income would put the US in

Source: BofAML US Equity & Quant Strategy, FactSet, S&P

Bankof America

Merrill Lynch

Equity Strategy Focus Point | 29 January 2017

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023083

15
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031257.txt,"""The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.

- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched
in

an unwelcome manner.

- The conference attendee who took the ‘selfie’ photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference
organisers

at the time of the incident (November 2016).

- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference
organisers

at the time of the incident (November 2016).

-The photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.

- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who
took

the ‘selfie’ photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was
requested

in the course of the investigation.”

(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies
not to include flashes, so that I don’t end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half

hour. Moreover, I have no idea if the other eyewitnesses you quote, who were not involved in any complaint,
were in fact there but this was a formal banquet with individuals and their partners, which I attended long
enough to agree to sign things and do selfies before leaving early because I was tired. Even if I had any such
intent it would have been lunacy to pose for selfies in front of a group and openly do such a thing, including
presumably in front of this person’s partner, . Which, besides the fact that I don’t do such things, is one of the
many reasons it never happened.)

What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies,
and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, or sometimes aggressive. I am particularly
proud of the way I work to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated, whatever their
behavior or request. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which characterizes all my
interactions with fans: to acknowledge them in a way that makes them feel appreciated and respected. As I
understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this
year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed and should report on. Moreover, I am proud of the
interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff of all genders and

ethnicities. I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as
responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally.

On Dec 10, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Peter Aldhous i, wrote:

Dr. Krauss:

As you know, I’m a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations
against you. As we've already discussed by email, I’d very much like to interview you about these allegations in
detail.

In particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6
below). You claimed that “both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and
fabricated with malicious intent.” We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious
intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031257
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014691.txt,"a Case 1:15-cv-07433-RW AIS DEINE EP on Shs Page 2 of 4

In compliance with Chapter 617, F.S., (Not for Profit)

ARTICLE I NAME

The name of the corporation shall be: Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.

ARTICLE IT ____ PRINCIPAL OFFICE

Principal street address: Mailing address, if different is:

425 North Andrews Ave.
Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

ARTICLE WT __ PURPOSE

: — ._,... Victims Refuse Silence, Inc. is organized exclusively for charitable and
The purpose for which the corporation is organized is:

educational purposes including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt

organizations under section 504 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax

code. The corporation is organized to provide assistance to victims of sexual abuse as well as victims of human trafficking.

Upon the dissolution of Victims Refuse Silence, Inc., assets shall be distributed for one or more exempt purpose within

the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or corresponding section of any future federal tax

code, or shall be distributed to the federal government, or to a state or local government, for a public purpose.

ARTICLE IV ___ MANNER OF ELECTION ___The manner in which the directors are elected and appointed: The manner in
which the directors are elected or appointed is provided in the bylaws of the Corporation.

ARTICLE _V INITIAL OFFICERS AND/OR DIRECTORS

Name and Tite. Virginia Roberts, Director Name and Title: den i A my
en or
Suite 2 S25

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 wae SS

Name and Title: Bradley J. Edwards, Director Name and Title: on

Sulte2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Brittany N. Henderson, Director ... and T

Address:

Name and Title:

Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

itle:

Address:

GIUFFRE001063

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014691
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029051.txt,"Now, Eric Cantor, it was a landslide. He lost 57-43, and not one — outside of Breitbart, we
covered this for six months, day in and day out — not one news site — not Fox News, not
Politico, no sites picked this up. And the reason that this guy won is quite simple: Middle-
class people and working-class people are tired of people like Eric Cantor who say they’re

conservative selling out their interests every day to crony capitalists.

“That center-right revolt is really a global
revolt. I think you’re going to see it in Latin
America, I think you’re going to see it in Asia,
I think you’ve already seen it in India.”

And you're seeing that whether that was UKIP and Nigel Farage in the United Kingdom,
whether it’s these groups in the Low Countries in Europe, whether it’s in France, there’s a
new tea party in Germany. The theme is all the same. And the theme is middle-class and
working-class people — they’re saying, “Hey, I’m working harder than I’ve ever worked.
I’m getting less benefits than I’m ever getting through this, I’m incurring less wealth
myself, and I’m seeing a system of fat cats who say they’re conservative and say they back
capitalist principles, but all they’re doing is binding with corporatists.” Right?
Corporatists, to garner all the benefits for themselves.

And that center-right revolt is really a global revolt. I think you’re going to see it in Latin
America, I think you’re going to see it in Asia, I think you’ve already seen it in India.
Modi’s great victory was very much based on these Reaganesque principles, so I think this
is a global revolt, and we are very fortunate and proud to be the news site that is reporting
that throughout the world.

Harnwell: I think it’s important to understand the distinction that you’re drawing here
between what can be understood as authentic, free-market capitalism as a means of
promoting wealth that [wnintelligible] involves everybody with a form of crony capitalism
which simply benefits a certain class. And we’ve watched over the course of our

conference, we’ve watched two video segments produced by the Acton Institute about

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029051
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012871.txt,"including murder, rape, and arson. Oddly, although this work provided one of the cleanest links between
genes and violence in humans, it slid under the radar of scientific attention, only to be resuscitated and
enriched about ten years later.

The behavioral geneticists Avshalom Caspi and Terry Moffitt studied a large population of young
boys over several years. Though boys and girls have the MAOA gene, its effect on behavior is easier to
study in boys because they have only one copy whereas girls have two, one for each of their two X
chromosomes. For each boy, Caspi and Moffitt collected information on the presence and frequency of
their antisocial behavior and whether they were raised by parents who were caring, mildly abusive, or
severely abusive. For each boy, they also noted whether they had the low or high expressing form of
MAOA.

Caspi and Moffitt’s results provided a textbook example of nature’s interaction with nurture. If
the parents were caring, the genes made no difference in their child’s personality or behavior. If the
parents were mildly abusive, the boys with the low activity form were nine times more likely to fight,
steal, bully, and defiantly break rules. For those boys with severely abusive parents and the low activity
form of MAOA, 85% developed into violent, delinquent criminals. What these findings tell us is that in
humans, it makes little difference which form of MAOA you have if you grow up with nurturing parents.
But if you grow up with abusive parents, your genes make all the difference in the world. Those with the
low expressing form are more likely than not to develop into delinquents, whereas those with the high
expressing form are more likely than not to develop immunity. By a double dose of bad luck, one shot
from the genes and one from the environment, some have a high probability of entering into the pool of
potential evildoers.

The German neuroscientist Andreas Meyer-Lindenburg took the genetic work one step further,
linking the particular form of MAOA up to differences in the brain. Those with relatively poor social
regulation and the low expressing form of MAOA had significantly smaller brains, specifically in regions
associated with the control of emotion and social behavior — the amygdala, anterior cingulate, and
prefrontal cortex. These individuals also had less connectivity between these regions, harking back to the
importance of promiscuity both between humans and other animals, but also within our own species. Less
connectivity translates to less control by the frontal areas of the brain over emotion-relevant areas such as
the amygdala. When individuals with the low expressing form viewed angry or fearful facial expressions,
the emotionally-relevant brain areas went into hyper-drive, whereas those areas involved in regulating
emotions hibernated. Thus, in contrast with individuals who have the high expressing form of MAOA,
those with the low expressing form are overwhelmed by emotionally charged experiences, lacking the

mental brakes to stay cool. By luck of the draw, the low expressing form of MAOA builds a child that is

Hauser Chapter 4. Wicked in waiting 125

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012871
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030581.txt,"Date: Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:48 PM 
Subject: Fwd: <no subject> 
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation©grnail.corn> 
To: 
----------Forwarded message---------- 
From: gmax <gmaxl@ellmax.com > 
Date: Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM 
Subject: <no subject> 
To: J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com > 
Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance < 
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-
couple-j effrey-ep stein- and-ghislaine- maxwell.html > 
by Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfaircom/contributors/vicky-  ward> 
March 8,2011, 2:30 PM 
""I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will never 
think the same way about anything again."" 
So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment 
as the alleged ""procurer"" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. 
Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another 
investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested 
them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's 
friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal. 
I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called ""The Talented Mr. Epstein."" It was largely a business piece that focused on his 
mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited 
Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail 
sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. 
The piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had 
sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how 
Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. 
This is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing 
financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-
chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? 
And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, 
my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. 
Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of 
them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet 
behind him, as if serving a monarch. ""Do they speak?"" I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He 
laughed. ""Not like you, Vicky,"" was his riposte. 
I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't studied math 
since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a 
book: ""Math for idiots."" 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030581 
So he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. 
""Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,"" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly 
preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot ofthings. Just a few moments in his company and 
you know this to be true. 
When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that ""Andy""—as Jeffrey 
calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing's 
for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far more than ""Andy"" does. Which is 
why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him. 
And Ghislaine? 
Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. 
She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking to her about 
the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom 
of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away 
almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for 
hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. 
Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known 
fondly to her close friends as ""the Tennis Goddess"") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she 
really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. 
And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. 
""He saved her,"" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. ""When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then 
Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will."" 
In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her 
father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's 
father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive ""black hole"" he'd fraudulently created. To 
Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange. 
In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end 
either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid 
paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top by being the world's most 
balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second 
""wife"" for many years whose existence he has been open about. 
So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends 
like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one 
sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes. 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030582 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030583 
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033230.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Attachments: 
Anil.Ambani___________________ 
3/30/2017 11:01:20 AM 
jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early 
RCS.scanner@relianceada.com_20170330_154847.pdf 
Importance: High 
Dear Jeffrey, 
Info. 
BR, 
Anil (3ffta) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033230 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011118.txt,"The advantage of the simultaneous rates test over the standard lagged flows one is
great. It avoids both lags, meaning the intended one to allow more capital to show
its effect in more output, and the unintended one in the inherent unresponsiveness
of accounts to market effects on capital already booked, while also gaining from the
superiority of market measures of capital growth over book ones even when lags
end. The method itself is no surprise because the math is high school algebra. The
shock is in what it reveals. Solow and Denison were righter than they knew. There is

no such thing as capital accumulation at the collective scale.

Risk theory is probably both marginal novelty and marginal surprise. The part that
might be new, although obvious in retrospect, is that assets take on the risk
characteristics of their owners. We knew all along that people buy assets to fit their
own risk profiles. There may be novelty in my idea that it works the same in the
opposite direction. Assets once acquired are modified to fit those profiles better. A
family home bought by a drug dealer might become a crack house bringing higher

expected return at higher risk of confiscation by authorities.

The next step was to connect risk profiles with age and gender. It seems well
established that risk tolerance peaks in the teens and twenties, particularly in males.
It drops steadily afterward for both sexes. R. A. Fisher in 1930, and Bob Trivers in
1972, suggested why. Males, in humans, produce thousands of cheap sperm.
Females produce eggs, which are few and expensive because they are packed with
nutrients. Young males might end up leaving dozens of offspring or none. Nature
arranges competition to determine which. Females are reasonably sure to leave a
few. They have less to compete about. As both sexes get past their 20s, their
remaining reproductive chances grow fewer and competitive ranking clearer. There
is less to compete about. Risk tolerance grades steadily down with age, and capital

owned reflects the change with lower risk and return. This gives the basic theme.

The next key information was that human capital is owned disproportionately by

the young. We own little else until independence at age 20 or so. Physical capital

Chapter 9: So What ‘s New? 3/17/16 2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011118
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016086.txt,"Panda, Eats Shoots

“Parenthetical remarks (however
relevant) are unnecessary.”

Frank L. Visco,
How to Write Good

“Defining what we mean by

a robot is hard to do. I know
now when I see one but that
definition works for anything,
even pizza.”

Mike Gregory

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016086
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030266.txt,"From: paul krassner

Sent: 12/3/2018 4:59:38 PM
To: Nancy C2 in
Subject: Fwd

Importance: High

Begin forwarded message:

From: ""The Daily Beast: AM Cheat Sheet"" <emails@thedailybeast.com>
Subject: Michelle Obama Halts Book Tour for Bush Funeral
Date: December 3, 2018 at 4:21:57 AM PST

To:

UGH
Alan

. [x] The linked
Dershowitz:) ~ image came
Yes, |Am rave ben
Still Jeffrey | semto
Epstein’s
Lawyer

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz has said that he still represents

convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who pleaded guilty to

soliciting underage sexual partners whom he initially

recruited as masseurs. Dershowitz, 80, told Axios that

Epstein “has called me a couple of times about legal issues,

because I’m still technically his lawyer,” adding, “I haven’t

had any social, or any other kind of contact [but] you never

stop being a person’s lawyer.” Dershowitz told Axios that

Epstein lent his family his Palm Beach, Florida, house and

that he received a “therapeutic massage with an old old

Russian” there, but he’d had no idea “anything improper had

even taken place in that house.” While he was allegedly

raping teenage girls, Epstein cultivated relationships with a

global elite: Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane, nicknamed

the “Lolita Express,” numerous times; Prince Andrew’s ex-

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030266
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029737.txt,"Reagan's second-term innovations on
currency and monetary affairs, trade, debt
and development. Reagan advanced a
new international system to match the
revival of capitalism after the oil shocks
and stagflation of the 1970s. America's
success in the 1980s contributed both to
the end of the Cold War, by persuading
the Soviet Union it could not keep up,
and to two decades of exceptional global
growth.

The new U.S. international economic
strategy should have five parts. First, this
country should strengthen its continental
base by building on the North American
Free Trade Agreement with Canada and
Mexico. Together, the three partners
could boost energy security, improve
productivity, and give North Americans
an edge in manufacturing and other
industries that are already experiencing
rising wages in East Asia. A politically
acceptable immigration policy, and a
push for educational innovation using
new technologies and competition, could
lead to a more prosperous, populous,
integrated and democratic future for the
hemisphere.

Second, the extraordinary monetary
policies of late, led by the Federal
Reserve's continued near-zero interest-
rate policy, are taking us into uncharted
territory. Central banks have tried most
every tool to stimulate growth; if Japan is

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029737
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032648.txt,"From: Larry Visoski 
Sent: 11/16/2017 11:59:01 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
Shouldn't be to bad if we are leaving early and Trump is not scheduled to depart until 3pm on Sunday, the 
Departure will be similar to a DCA Departure with Customs, 
TSA will have an office set up inside the FBO, you will enter the main lobby at Atlantic and be escorted to the 
plane after you meet with TSA officers., 
I have to schedule all passengers names 24hours in advance, no additions within 24 Hours, 
Thx 
Larry 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 16, 2017, at 6:45 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
scheudle us to leave sunday early to lsj, we will have to go through hoops to clear ? 
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Larry Visoski 
Jeffrey, 
Thx for the update, 
Just to confirm, LSJ trip is Next Sunday the 26th as you stated„ 
POTUS schedule: 
Arrival: Tuesday November 21' @ 1800ish 
Departure: Sunday November 26th @ 1500ish 
wrote: 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, 
larry , it will be and I, trump is in town that week, 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032648 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032649 
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032038.txt,"cnn.com / James Griffiths Hong Kong (CNN) — As commemorations
for the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre take place

worldwide Tuesday, any coverage or discussion...

Trump signs long-stalled $19.1B
disaster relief bill

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032038
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010560.txt,"CCC
ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG
A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS

NATHAN GOLDBERG* 6300 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD

MICHAEL MAROKO*

SUITE 1500 OF COUNSEL

GLORIA R. ALLRED* + © MARIA G. DIAZ

JOHN S. WEST

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90048

RENEE MOCHKATEL

DOLORES Y. LEAL FS E-MAIL:
a

MARGERY N. SOMERS

MARCUS SPIEGEL

www.amglaw.com

CHRISTINA CHEUNG}

BYRON LAU

KIRBY F. CANON

* A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION June 19, 2019

~ ALSO ADMITTED TO NEW YORK BAR
SALSO ADMITTED TO WASHINGTON DC BAR

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS & EMAIL

Mr. Scott Link

Link & Rockenbach, PA

1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Re:

Dear Mr. Link,

We represent with reference to her claims against Jeffrey Epstein
for childhood sexual abuse which occurred in New York City when she was] years old.

New York recently passed the Child Victims Act which creates a 1 year window for
claims where the statute of limitations had expired. Therefore, I will be able to sue
Mr. Epstein for the sexual abuse which she experienced while she was a minor.

BE was the perfect victim.
She was born in HB a town on the JJ coast. When | was four years

old, HE descended into civil war. At the age of six, her entire village was evacuated. She
fled her hometown travelling through war zones on foot with her family, in a stream of refugees.

Her family settled in the outskirts of J. As refugees, with no money, her family
lived together in one room, sharing a bathroom with other families. Her parents eventually
found low paying, unskilled jobs. Their only clothing was what was provided to them by the
Red Cross.

When she was ten years old, SM family arrived in ee.

By the sixth grade, NM was 5°10”, beautiful and naturally slim. She desperately

NEW YORK OFFICES | 305 BROADWAY, SUITE 607 | NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007
T (212) 202-2966 | FAX (212) 202-2967

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010560
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031531.txt,"From: Marc.Kensington [a

Sent: 11/27/2016 8:44:06 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

Too bad. I was excited to have a drink with you. Mr. Kiss is still alive and has his real market price. I have mine at 35, but to far away from both
parts to have a chance to persuade both parties.
Regards

Marc LEON

Partner - Managing Director

KENSINGTON
Luxury Properties Sarl

Avenue Yacoub El Mansour
Arset Bata 3, App. 13, 5° et.
Guéliz - 40000 - Marrakech (Morocco)

Tel.:
Fax:
Cell:

Cell:

+
+
+
+

www.kensingtonmorocco.com

2016-11-27 20:41 GMT+00:00 Marc.Kensington (i :

Too bad. I was excited to have a

Marc LEON

Partner - Managing Director

KENSINGTON
Luxury Properties Sarl

Avenue Yacoub El Mansour

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031531
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017820.txt,"Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 6

deal that gave the eccentric multimillionaire — and co-conspirators employed by Epstein —
federal immunity in 2008.

Dershowitz, 80, told the Miami Herald that he has never met Ransome nor has he ever had sex
with her. He accused Ransome’s attorney, powerhouse lawyer David Boies, of inventing the
story and using her and another woman, Virginia Roberts, to frame him. Roberts asserted in a
federal court affidavit in 2015 that Epstein forced her to have sex with Dershowitz when she was
16 years old.

“T am the victim. David Boies and these women are the perpetrators,” Dershowitz said. “They
have willfully and deliberately concocted stories in order to make money — millions and
millions of dollars. And I will not rest until the entire story comes out,” said Dershowitz, a
professor at Harvard Law School and frequent Fox news guest commentator.

Nowhere in the court case or the transcript does Ransome or anyone else allege that Ransome
had sex with Dershowitz — only that she was directed to.

The Ransome settlement, which is confidential, comes two weeks after Epstein settled another
lawsuit in Palm Beach, filed by an attorney who represented several women who said they were
coerced into sex acts with Epstein when they were underage. As part of the settlement, Epstein,
65, issued an apology to Fort Lauderdale attorney Bradley Edwards, admitting that he leveled
false claims in a lawsuit as part of an effort to intimidate Edwards into abandoning his
aggressive advocacy for the women, who are now in their late 20s and early 30s.

The developments follow a series of stories published by the Miami Herald in late November
that detailed how state and federal prosecutors worked with Epstein’s lawyers to conceal the
extent of Epstein’s crimes, and secretly negotiated an unusual plea agreement that allowed him
to escape federal sex trafficking charges that could have sent him to prison for life. The
agreement, by design, was kept from his victims so that they could not appear at his sentencing.

Last week, more than two dozen lawmakers in Washington demanded a federal investigation
into that plea deal, which was negotiated, signed and sealed by former Miami U.S. Attorney
Alexander Acosta, now President Donald Trump’s secretary of labor.

Acosta has not commented on the Herald story or on the calls
for a probe into how he handled the Epstein case.

This week, a decade after defending Epstein, Dershowitz once
again found himself in the spotlight amid the new allegations,
mentioned briefly in a court filing on Nov. 28, and first
reported on Tuesday by the New York Daily News.

During a Nov. 7 hearing, Maxwell’s lawyer, Laura Menninger,
mentioned Dershowitz’s name as among those “third parties”
that Ransome claims she was instructed to have sex with,
according to a transcript of the hearing obtained by the Herald.

On Tuesday, after the Daily News published its story,
Dershowitz lashed out in dozens of posts on Twitter,
denouncing Ransome as “delusional” and claiming that her

Alan Dershowitz says he has never met
lawyer, Boies, was retaliating against him because Dershowitz the woman who alleges in a lawsuit she
had filed a bar complaint against him. was ordered to have sex with influential
men, including the famous lawyer. John
Lamparski GETTY IMAGES/TNS

“Attorney David Boies threatened that unless I withdrew a bar
complaint I had filed against him for falsely accusing me of
sexual misconduct, he would find another woman to accuse me of similar misconduct. He has

https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017820
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027831.txt,"Message: On it

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/28/19 02:28:35 PM (583450115)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AODF8C3D-B27D-4CEA-BAD6-4E648CA8 9D99

Message: Then aug ranch

Time: 06/28/19 02:45:37 PM (583451137)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 243D33E2-B650-4844-897E-59D3BE635CC4

Message: Excellent

Time: 06/28/19 04:19:44 PM (583456784)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 82EC7667-8E3A-4365-8600-C63B576DDD04

Message: 5 July to 10 July Paris ???

Time: 06/29/19 11:09:52 AM (583524592)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

cal

GUID: BI8D6F6B-F64E-47A8-AAED-52D1C881AF5D

Message: Did u get Chernobyl yet???

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/29/19 11:11:36 AM (583524696)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: DF45EA33-6B2C-4E7/3-82B1-8F60606F/C8F71

Message: Yes

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027831
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377.txt,"13, Section 205

DOJ opposes the addition of the new subsection 240.A(b)(6)(A) of the Immigration and
Nationality 21 Act (8 U.S.C. 1229b(b)) unless the word “Federal” is added before “law
enforcement official.” The same proposed subsection currently states that the Secrctary of the
Department of Homeland Security “shall grant parole” to the relatives of trafficking victims.
DOJ recommends changing this language to read “may grant parole” so the Secretary has the
latitude to make an appropriate decision, There may be reasons pertaining to the circumstances
of the relatives of the trafficking victim for which the Secretary should have discretion to deny
parole, Further, DOJ finds it necessary to strike any reference to “as a result of the alien’s
cooperation with law enforcement” for the reasons noted above.

In subsection, (6)(B)(i)(1, DOJ opposes a statutory requirement that parole be extended
during pending civil actions. As indicated above, this action would create a potential for abuse
because of the lengthy and plaintiff/victim-controlled delays in conducting civil Litigation.

14. = Section 211

The Department opposes the change of the “and” in subsection (1)(A) to an “or.” Both
the Attorney General and the Secretary of DHS need to be involved in the certification process.
The current certification process is well-established and needs no statutory revisions. DOJ also
opposes the change in subsection (1)(B), which would remove the Attorney General's authority
in stating whether a person’s presence is necessary in cnsuring an effective prosecution. As the
agency that prosecutes cases of human trafficking, DOJ’s involvement is vitally important. The |
Department has the same concern with the proposed change in subsection (2).

15. Section 213

We strongly oppose the language in this section that inappropriately removes law
enforcement from any initial determination of victim status or benefits eligibility. DOJ and DHS
play a critical role in protecting the safety of victims and service providers. Any failure to
involve Federal law enforcement immediately upon suspicion that a crime has been committed

_ could threaten the safety of the victim, impeded efforts to promptly rescue victims still in
jeopardy, and possibly man that the offenders avoid apprehension. DOJ recognizes the
important of including HHS at the initial stages for the purpose of facilitating prompt delivery of
the full range of available benefits and services to trafficking victims. DOJ will continue to work
with DHS and HHS to ensure that interagency procedures afford victims of trafficking prompt
protection and access to these services. :

The Department further objects to the provision set forth in paragraph (G), which would
require both Federal and state law enforcement officials to inform the Department of Health and ,
Human Services (HHS) of the existence of a potential victim, but does not require HHS, other

Government officials, or non-governmental service providers to inform Federal or state law

enforcement of such a victim. To the extent that such a notification procedure must exist, it must

also include notification to the Attorney General and the Secretary of DHS, who bear

responsibility for prosecuting and investigating instances of human trafficking.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024971.txt,"14

his third term and announced his interest in running against President
Hosni Mubarak in the election scheduled for this year. In 2005, he
and the agency were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for their
nonproliferation endeavors. Doubtless the Norwegian selectors,
always ready to needle American hawks, also sought to reward his
bold critique of the American-led war against Iraq, especially since
they drew ill-tempered ripostes from top officials in the Bush
administration, particularly “Dick Cheney and his faction.”

In many ways, this David-Goliath confrontation over Iraq both drove
E|Baradei in his years atop the I.A.E.A. and also inspired this
memoir. The Iraq story is well known. The Bush team insisted that
Saddam Hussein — who had cheated on nukes and chemical
weapons once before and been caught — had or was on the verge of
acquiring nuclear weapons, and they demanded I.A.E.A. inspections
of Iraq to confirm it. The agency conducted 247 inspections at 147
sites in Iraq from November 2002 until March 2003 and found no
violations and no nuclear weapons. Nonetheless, the United States
insisted on its own “evidence” and went to war. There can be no
exaggerating the negative effects of this experience on world opinion
toward the United States and upon ElBaradei himself as I.A.E.A.
chief.

E|Baradei’s self-proclaimed mission became preventing another Iraq-
type war. To this end, he significantly upgraded the agency’s
inspection capabilities, building on the work of his predecessor, Hans
Blix. At the same time, ElBaradei decried American
counterproliferation efforts as warmongering. These campaigns
provided the three themes of his memoir: the need to strengthen the
mandate and standing of the I.A.E.A., to restrain sword-waving by
the great powers (read the United States), and to emphasize
diplomacy and collective security instead.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024971
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011656.txt,"a peace treaty. Again, I was watching closely, via American TV. But as the
summit was winding down, our phone suddenly rang in Palo Alto.

“Ehud, how’s it going? Are you following what’s happening here? What do
you think?”

I recognized the voice immediately: Ezer Weizman, the former fighter pilot
Begin had chosen as his defense minister. I’d known Ezer since the early 1960s,
when he’d been commander of the air force and Sayeret Matkal was planning
its first operations. Still, even though he had a reputation for batting ideas back
and forth outside the bounds of hierarchy or chain of command, I was startled to
hear from him.

“What do I think about what?” I said.

“The solution we’ ve arrived at here. We found there was no way but to give
back everything.” The only exception was Taba, a sliver of land where the
Negev met the eastern edge of the Sinai, across from the Jordanian town of
Aqaba.

“Was there no way to convince them, even with some kind of a land swap, to
keep the two air bases?” I asked.

“Believe me, we wanted to,” Ezer replied. “But no way. Not if we were
going to get a peace treaty.”

So I said the obvious: if that’s what was necessary for peace, there was no
other choice.

We were now well into our final year at Stanford. Our home was in a leafy
“student village” off campus, called Escondito, for married students from
abroad. Our two-storey flat was one of a row of cabin-like structures: a bit like a
kibbutz, only smaller, American-style, a lot more upmarket. It had a fenced-off
play area for the children and, in a common room for all the village residents, an
upright piano.

I found the richness of the academic environment — and the time to explore
and savor it — enthralling. I’d chosen my master’s program at Stanford because
it offered the chance to learn across a range of different schools and disciplines.
The official home for my degree courses was the School of Engineering, in a
department called ““Engineering-Economic Systems’’. Its focus was on applying
mathematical modelling and analysis to decision-making in “large and complex

185
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011656
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020435.txt,"283

APPENDEX A

SPIES AND ESPIONAGE SOURCES
[TK]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020435
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026196.txt,"Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026196
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032660.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
12/8/2017 8:37:17 PM 
jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Re: 
Importance: High 
m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Yes 
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM < wrote: 
sorry that is 2512 for the gate Ii 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
lOpm should I bring special cake from New York 
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM___________________________wrote: 
very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send 
me the day and time. 
thnx 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
You are welcome at my house always . And more private 
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Of courses 
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM wrote: 
??? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
at the moment i was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to 
meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. , 
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM, rote: 
can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 
, 9th 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032660 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032661 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
--
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032662 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010548.txt,"James PATTERSON

Kennedy Smith. The prosecutors presented Epstein a
choice: plead to more serious state felony charges (that
would result in 2 years’ imprisonment, registration as a
sexual offender, and restitution for the victims) or else
prepare for a federal felony trial.

What followed was a year-long assault on the prose-
cution and the prosecutors. I use the word assault inten-
tionally, as the defense in this case was more aggressive
than any which I, or the prosecutors in my office, had
previously encountered. Mr. Epstein hired an army of
legal superstars: Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, for-

mer Judge and then Pepperdine Law Dean Kenneth Starr,

former Deputy Assistant to the President and then Kirk-
land & Ellis Partner Jay Lefkowitz, and several others,
including prosecutors who had formerly worked in the
US. Attorney’s Office and in the Child Exploitation and
Obscenity Section of the Justice Department. Defense
attorneys next requested a meeting with me to challenge
the prosecution and the terms previously presented by
the prosecutors in their meeting with Mr. Black. The
prosecution team and 1 met with defense counsel in Fall
2007, and I reaffirmed the office’s position: two years,
registration and restitution, or trial.

Over the next several months, the defense team pre-
sented argument after argument claiming that felony
criminal proceedings against Epstein were unsupported
by the evidence and lacked a basis in law, and that the
office’s insistence on jail-time was motivated by a zeal to
overcharge a man merely because he is wealthy. They

bolstered their arguments with legal opinions from

208

Fu

well-known legal expert
team warned me that the
good man to serve time -
book if we continued tc
office systematically con:
ment, and when we di
appealed to Washington. .
The defense strategy :
Defense counsel investiga
their families, looking for
provide a basis for disqual
ecutor is an effective (th
eliminating the individua
and thus most qualified to
lihood for success. Defens:
least two prosecutors. |
rejected, these arguments.
Despite the army of att
the terms first presented
meeting. On June 30, 2008
appeal to Washington D.C
guilty in state court. He w:
onment, register as a sexua
restitution to the victims.
Some may feel that the |
tougher. Evidence that has
encourage that view. Many
out, filing detailed statemen
ages. Physical evidence has

these additional statements

2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010548
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032010.txt,"confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032010
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021593.txt,"1

09/30/2008

Case Number: 31E-MM-108062
Serial No.:

Drugs
A Fugitive

Does Accomplishment Involve

Bankruptcy Fraud

Computer Fraud/Abuse

Corruption of Public Officials: N
Money Laundering

Sub. Invest. Asst by Other FOs:

KRKKKEKKKEKE CHILD LOCATE *** eek RAR RH

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

Stat Agent Name:
Stat Agent SOC.:

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

FINAN ANALYST
AIRCRAFT ASST
COMPUTER ASST
CONSEN MONITR
ELSUR/FISC
ELSUR/III

ENG FIELD SUP
ENG TAPE EXAM
LEGATS ASST.
EVIDNCE PURCH
INFORMANT/CW
LAB DIV EXAMS

Living/Deceased: Living
Date Child Located: 06/30/2008

ENTERED UPON RECEIPT

LAB FIELD SUP
PEN REGISTERS
PHOTO COVERGE
POLYGRAPH
SRCH WAR EXEC
SHOW MONEY
SOG ASST

SWAT TEAM
TECH AG/EQUIP
TEL TOLL RECS
UCO-GROUP I
UCO-GROUP II

UCO - NAT BACK
NCAVC/VI-CAP
CRIM/NS INTEL
CRIS NEG-FED
CRIS NEG~LOC
ERT ASST
BUTTE-ITC
SAVANNAH- ITC
POC-WRCSC

FT. MON-NRCSC
FOR LANG ASST
NON FBI LAB EX

VICT-WITN COOR
10 WANTED FLYR
SARS

CART

ASSET FORF PRO
FORF SUPPORT P
TFOS/CTD
CXS/cTD
INFRAGARD/CYD
OFC/CID

PPP

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

[|

Assisting Agents SOC

RWhHR

09/30/08 18:59:53

Report Date: 09/30/2008
Accom Date.: 06/30/2008

Subject Name

RA Squad Task Force

PBC PB2

Used, but did not help
Helped, Minimally
Helped, Substantially
Absolutely Essential

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021593
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023915.txt,"Restructuring the University 169

As it stands now, we can’t. High schools teach what colleges tell
them to teach. Recently I was looking for a picture of the man who
was principal of my elementary school many years ago. I wanted to
put it in a speech I was about to give. So, I went to the P.S. 247 (Brook-
lyn) website and discovered that it is now a “New York City College
Partnership Elementary School.” When I finished laughing, I started
to wonder when this “everyone must spend their entire childhood
worrying about getting into college” nonsense would end. P.S. 247
was not a great bastion of learning or a fun place in the 1950s, and I
can only imagine how awful it is now. I wondered why P.S. 247 now
had to be a college prep elementary school. A commenter on what I
wrote noted that the old trade schools, which used to dominate the
New York school system, were serving mostly minority populations
and this had to stop; so now “everyone can go to college” is the man-
tra of the equity folks.

But the problem is, of course, that what is being bought with all
this college preparation is the right to be an unemployed English ma-
jor instead of the airplane mechanic you might have been if you had
gone to Aviation High School.

High school has become all about college, and college is all about
scholarship and research, so what is left? So who teaches students to
think clearly? Who teaches students about the possibilities there are
for work that might interest them? Who teaches students how to get
along with one another, and who teaches people how to communi-
cate well?

Certainly not the high schools, which are obsessed with test score
preparation, which means rote memory for the most part.

Certainly not the colleges, which are run by faculty who do re-
search and who think mostly about that.

One possible answer is community colleges, but when someone
like me suggests that skipping college and going to community college
instead to learn an actual skill might be a good idea for most students,
that suggestion is disregarded as being on the lunatic fringe.

The good news is that because of all this craziness, there is a big
opportunity to build an alternative, which I will discuss in Chapter 14.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023915
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017808.txt,"Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald Page 8 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 9 of 18

In the affidavit, Roberts claimed that Epstein and Maxwell directed her to have sex with Andrew and Dershowitz and others. She had sex with Andrew
three times, she alleged — once in London, when she was 17, again in New York, when she was 17, and a third time, as part of an orgy on Epstein’s island,
when she was 18. By law, at 17, she would have been above the age of consent in New York and England, but not in Florida, where the age of consent is 18.

As part of the affidavit, Roberts furnished a photograph of her with the prince and Maxwell, which she said was taken in London.
Dershowitz, who was part of Epstein’s criminal defense team, was often a guest at Epstein’s homes, she said.

“Thad sexual intercourse with Dershowitz at least six times,” Roberts wrote in the 2015 court affidavit. “The first time was when I was about 16, early on
in my servitude to Epstein and it continued until I was 19.” She detailed some of those alleged trysts, which she said happened at Epstein’s homes in Palm
Beach, New Mexico and on Epstein’s island.

One of Epstein’s housemen, Juan Alessi, testified in a 2009 sworn deposition that Dershowitz visited Epstein’s Palm Beach home four or five times a year.
He said that Roberts was a frequent visitor as well, but he never placed Dershowitz and Roberts at the house at the same time.

Alessi, who testified he worked for Epstein from 1999 to 2002, said there were often young girls who gave massages at the house, even in the middle of the
night. But he said he never checked their ages, and only knew one girl for certain who was underage, because he had picked her up from high school. That
girl, who is now an actress, was not one of Epstein’s masseuses, Alessi said.

He also said he was Maxwell’s driver, and he recalls waiting outside of Mar-a-Lago the day Maxwell met Roberts. He testified he saw Maxwell talking to
Roberts and recalls Roberts coming to Epstein’s mansion later that day. One of Alessi’s jobs was to drive Maxwell to various spas in Palm Beach where she
left business cards in order to “recruit” more masseuses, he said in the sworn deposition.

Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and Maxwell have long denied Roberts’ allegations.

In an interview with the Herald, Dershowitz reiterated that he had never met Roberts, and never saw Epstein with any underage girls.

“The story was 100 percent flatly categorically made-up,” he said, adding that Roberts and her attorneys fabricated the assertion in order to get money
from other powerful, wealthy people she alleges she had sex with.

“The only possible reason to accuse me in public and [them] in private is so she could get money,” Dershowitz said.

Edwards and his co-counsel in the Crime Victims’ lawsuit, University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell, sued Dershowitz for defamation and Dershowitz
countersued in 2015. The case was settled out of court, with Dershowitz saying he had been vindicated.

Dershowitz said he received a massage at Epstein’s Palm Beach home only once — but that it was just a regular, therapeutic massage by a masseuse — not
by Roberts or anyone underage. Dershowitz’s wife was there at Epstein’s house at the time, Dershowitz said in the deposition taken for the case in 2015.

“I never had any knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein having any contact with any underage women — ever,” Dershowitz told the Herald.

Edwards and Cassell admitted making a “tactical mistake” in filing the accusations against Dershowitz as part of a lawsuit not involving him. But they
emphasized that the settlement had no bearing on the veracity of Roberts’ allegations.

The judge for the Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit agreed that the affidavit was misplaced in that case, and it was dropped.
Prince Andrew’s spokesman at Buckingham Palace did not respond to an email requesting comment.

Roberts, now 35, said it has taken her a long time to stand up to Epstein. She and 20 other victims received settlements from Epstein, ranging from
$50,000 to more than $1 million. The exact amounts have been kept confidential.

“Tt takes so long until you are able to speak about it. It took me having a daughter and looking at this young, beautiful innocent baby to say I want to speak
out about it now. I’m hoping that this will bring out more girls so that they say, Me Too.”

The state court hearing

The judge at Epstein’s sentencing hearing at the Palm Beach County Courthouse knew very little about Epstein’s crimes. The sentencing paperwork was
restricted to Epstein’s specific charges: one count of solicitation of prostitution and one count of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article2 19494920 html 4/3/2019
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017808
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031519.txt,"From: = LarrySunmers

Sent: 11/11/2016 5:57:02 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High
Times bad. R u around Tuesday?
Sent from my iPad

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: Po

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Larry Summers <9 wrote:

Got it.
Now remember

Press is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: I

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the hillary
says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner. its
disgraceful, but. here we are

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031519
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024781.txt,"Deep Cell

Seattle, Washington
www.deepcell.industries

Deep Cell is a synthetic biology and cannabis
intellectual property holding company. The
company provides licenses to companies who
wish to produce Deep Cell’s cannabis-infused
sugar. Its products are available from Deep Cell
licensees.

DIXIE

hk Pee Ce Ca

Dixie Elixirs

Denver, Colorado
www.dixieelixirs.com

Dixie Elixirs is a producer of branded. canna-
bis-infused edibles. The company produces
a wide range of products, including choco-
late-based edibles, beverages, capsules, mints,
energy shots, topicals and disposable vapor-
izer pens. The company’s products are sold in
many dispensaries throughout California and

Colorado.

© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

CHAPTER VIII Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies 2018

DEFONCE

Gx oeetcaratriftet

Défoncé

Oakland, California
www.defonce.com

Défoncé is a producer of branded cannabis-
infused products, primarily focusing on choco-
late-based edibles. The company offers a wide
range of chocolate-bar flavors that are available
in dispensaries located throughout California.

O

dosist’

Dosist

Los Angeles, California
www.dosist.com

Dosist is a producer of cannabis vaporizers.
The company develops pre-filled cannabis vapor-
izers that are designed to provide consumers
with a specific mood. The company’s products
are available in dispensaries located throughout

California.

145

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024781
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020855.txt,"Welcome to the Financial Reality (& Negative Trend) of USA Inc.

F2010 Cash Flow = -$1.3 Trillion; Net Worth = -$44 Trillion

USA Inc. Annual Cash Flow & Year-End Net Worth, F1996 — F2010
BAGS 6 m2 ce me — mn ae oc ms mn = a ws — a HS $15,000

$0 oe

= <
8 s
z al
3 -$15,000 <=
£

2 °
a =
= ‘ _
a Q =
CE) De oe er -- $30,000 F
3 7
2 mm One-Time Expenses* ul
< ty]
$ "" ‘ a A

$1,200 mmm Cash Flow (leftaxis) = - A -$45,000

>= Net Worth (right axis) ¥
$1600 oo -$60,000
F1996 F1998 F2000 F2002 F2004 F2006 F2008 F2010

Note: USA federal fiscal year ends in September; Cash flow = total revenue — total spending on a cash basis; net worth includes unfunded future liabilities from

Social Security and Medicare on an accrual basis over the next 75 years. *One-time expenses in F2008 include $14B payments to Freddie Mac; F2009

includes $279B net TARP payouts, $97B payment to Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac and $40B stimulus spending on discretionary items; F2010 includes $26B net

TARP income, $137B stimulus spending and $41B payment to Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. F2010 net worth improved dramatically owing to revised actuarial

estimates for Medicare program resulted from the Healthcare reform legislation. For more definitions, see next slide. Source: cash flow per White House Office

KP of Management and Budget; net worth per Dept. of Treasury, “2010 Financial Report of the U.S. Government.”
www.kpcb.com

USA Inc. | High Level Thoughts 27

Think About That...

The previous chart is in
TRILLIONS of dollars. Just

because million, billion and
trillion rhyme, doesn't mean
that they are even close
to the same quantity.

KP
a USA Inc. | High Level Thoughts 28

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020855
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027819.txt,"Time: 06/21/19 10:03:08 AM (582829388)

Flags: 10
Is Read:

Is Invita

GUID: 9FD756CD-44A1-4920-BD65-D7AFO8EE

Message:

Sender:

60865

Yes

tion:

K

No

EDS

oO

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/21/19 10:04:28 AM (582829468)

Flags: 10
Is Read:

Is Invita

85445

No

tion:

No

GUID: CHAFO78D-75D7-4881-8C04-6F6436C473A7

Message:

Sender:

Do your homework. Put someone on it

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/21/19 10:04:35 AM (582829475)

Flags: 10
Is Read:

Is Invita

85445

No

tion:

No

GUID: 8BB43C78-CE9F-4377-87ED-8496616BFF8C

Message:

Sender:

Guaranteed

Time: 06/
Flags: 11
Is Read:

Is Invita
GUID: 8BO

Message:

Flags: 10
Is Read:

Is Invita
GUID: 1c4

Message:

Sender:

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

2251.9
50981
No

tion:

907E1

https

60865
Yes
tion:

63A75

01:14:34 AM (582884074)

No

BB75-4AEF-9982-A536067AD56B

://international.la-croix.com/news/pope-francis-or-steve-bannon-
catholics-must-choose/10383#

Time: 06/22/19 03:23:23 AM (582891803)

No

7043-4098-A2B1-99F361455493

Easy choice

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027819
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024959.txt,"2

peace with just one man, Hosni Mubarak. That sale is over. Today,
post-Mubarak, to sustain the peace treaty with Egypt in any kind of
stable manner, Israel is going to have to pay retail. It is going to have
to make peace with 85 million Egyptians. The days in which one
phone call by Israel to Mubarak could shut down any crisis in
relations are over.

Amr Moussa, the outgoing head of the Arab League and the front-
runner in polls to succeed Mubarak as president when Egypt holds
elections in November, just made that clear in an interview with The
Wall Street Journal. Regarding Israel, Moussa said: “Mubarak had a
certain policy. It was his own policy, and I don’t think we have to
follow this. We want to be a friend of Israel, but it has to have two
parties. It is not on Egypt to be a friend. Israel has to be a friend,
too.”

Moussa owes a great deal of his popularity in Egypt to his tough
approach to Israel. I hope he has a broader vision. It is noteworthy
that in the decade he led the Arab League, he spent a great deal of
time jousting with Israel and did virtually nothing to either highlight
or deal with the conclusions of the 2002 U.N. Arab Human
Development Report — produced by a group of Arab scholars led by
an Egyptian — that said the Arab people are suffering from three
huge deficits: a deficit of freedom, a deficit of knowledge and deficit
of women’s empowerment.

The current Israeli government, however, shows little sign of being
prepared for peace retail. I can’t say with any certainty that Israel has
a Palestinian partner for a secure peace so that Israel can end its
occupation of the West Bank. But I can say with 100 percent
certainty that Israel has a huge interest in going out of its way to test
that possibility. The Arab world is going through a tumultuous
transition to a still uncertain destination. Israel needs to do all it can
to get out of their story, because it is going to be a wild ride.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024959
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030607.txt,"Different kind of fun.
It is fun for a short time but iam already getting sick of so many meetings!

Met your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has

some questions re microsoft.
How are you?
boris

Sent from my AT&T Windows Mobile phone.

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM

To: Boris Nikclic

Subject:

any fun?

3s 2fe 2s fe 2s 2s 24s ois 2fe ois fe fs fe 2c ois 2fe ois fe 2fs fe oie ois 2fe ois fe ois of oie ois 2fe ois 2fe fs fe 2c is 2fe ois 2fe of fe 2s ois 2fe ois 24s ois 2s 2s ois ofc ok 2fe os oie 2 ois 2k ok

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

Bis 2fe FIs 24s 2k 2s 24s is 24s 2s 2s 2s 2 24s ois 2fe ois fe 2s 2 2c ois 2fe ois fe os fe 2c ois 2fe ois fe fs fe 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe 2s 2 24s ois 2fe ois 24s ois fe 2c ois 2s ok 2fe 2s 2k 2c ois 2k 2

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030607
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012439.txt,"10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

—_

oO Oo OA OD TO SF W DN

~0929104. TXT
A. Uh-huh.

Q. -- did anyone ever discuss with you that
you could get reimbursement for your damages?
A. No, sir.
Q. Did you or any member --
MR. LEOPOLD: Are you referring to a
criminal matter or a civil matter?
BY MR. TEIN:
Q. Did you or any member --
MR. LEOPOLD: Excuse me. Let me object to
the form of the question.
BY MR. TEIN:
Q. Did you or any member of your family ever
get a victim notification letter from anyone?
A. | no longer live at that residence and |
wouldn't know.

Q. So your testimony is that you have never

52

received a victim notification letter, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. And your testimony is that you don't know
if your parents have ever received a victim notification
letter, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. Have you given any evidence to prosecutors

or law enforcement in this case?

A. What do you mean by evidence?
Q. Well. Anything that you can touch or feel?
A. No.

MR. LEOPOLD: Objection to the form of the

question.
Page 44

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012439
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018285.txt,"release valve for the over-inflated ambitions, nationalism, and hatreds that steamed
up between nations.

On our modern networked systems, however, power is different. On fast connected
webs of nearly any sort, tiny forces applied can have immense impacts that leap
from one domain to another. One erroneous commodity trade can snap-scramble a
marketplace - and then tip a bucket of chaos into nations, companies and trading
firms, One hacker, sneaking into the back-door of a computer network, can - to us a
term of art - “brick” a nation’s expensive security systems into devices as lively as a
doorstop: STUXNET spinning Iran’s centrifuges into planned madness, for
instance.’° Here’s the essential, dangerous insight about safety in a connected world:
It once required a big industrial force to defeat another big industrial force. Such
grinding victories required time. They could be prepared for. They could be avoided,
even. No more. Even the most formidable physical structures of our world -
militaries, markets, governments - can be rendered swiftly immobile by virtual
attacks on their connected nerve systems.’! These strikes - or, in some cases, these
accidents — baffle and then paralyze at network speed, by which I mean less time
than it took you to read this sentence. When the American national security strategy
speaks of a “long struggle” against terrorism or a rising China, it doesn’t
acknowledge how fast some of the turns ahead may be.” Yes, a decades-long battle
for control of essential networks and platforms and protocols lingers ahead. But I
fear some of the changes ahead will whiplash us with their speed. Generals in World
War One lamented that the whole war might have been prevented if diplomatic
communication had been conducted at the stately speed of the horse-carried
message. It was the damn velocity of the telegraph that baffled the judgment of
statesmen, they claimed. Figures whose every instinct runs ata pace far slower than
what the age demands were then - and are now - a menace.

The great 20 Century theorist of political realism, Hans Morgenthau, once referred
to nation states as “blind and potent monsters.”’? He felt a sort of nervous evil as he
studied the moves countries made on the stage of world history. Some of this unease
was surely a result of his own life, marked by a lucky escape from Germany in 1937,
as Hitler was finally perfecting a national machine of lurid and murderous potency. I
suspect Morgenthau would have been terrified now by the always-on, all-seeing
connected mesh that encloses us. Connected forces move at times like a potent and
capricious monster too, smashing businesses or national economies or ecosystems

70 One hacker: David Raymond, Tom Cross, Gregory Conti, Robert Fanelli, “A
Control Measure Framework to Limit Collateral Damage and Propagation of Cyber
Weapons”, Proceedings 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (NATO CCD
COE Publications, Tallinn 2013).

71 Even the most formidable: Daniel Geer, “Heartbleed as Metaphor”, Lawfare Blog
April 21, 2014

72 When the American: See 2014 US National Security Strategy

73 The great 20‘ Century theorist: Hans Morgenthau, “The State of Political
Science,” Politics in the Twentieth Century Vol. 1, (Chicago:University of Chicago
Press, YEAR HERE)

53

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018285
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014861.txt,"Chart 1: The gap between hard and soft data is a concern to investors Chart 2: Mediocre US Q1 data partly down to seasonal adjustments
Residual seasonality in GDP growth from 1985 to 2015

08
06
04
02

0

02
OA
08 aGoP
01/00 01/02 01/04 01/06 O1/08 01/10 O1/12 01/14 01/16 Private Investment
08
—— Surveys & Business Cycle Indicators 9———=Hard Data = Government consumption & investment
4
Qi Q2 Q3 Qs

Source: BofA Merl Lynch Global Research, Bloomberg
Source: Cleveland Federal Reserve

We continue to believe in the reflation theme because:

1. Strength in the global economy is genuine - European PMIs are at 6 year highs, Chinese and
Japanese PMIs continue to improve too. In fact ~90% of PMIs globally are above 50 and 60% have
increased in the last 3 months.

2. Earnings revisions and Global Wave point to continued upturn - earnings revisions now
above 1.0 for the first time since 2011.
Be We expect Trump to deliver on tax, even if it is smaller than hoped for - should such a

package be put together it would likely support the Trump trade once again after the failure to reform
Obamacare

4. Bond markets are being too sanguine about the likely pace of Fed tightening - the Fed
funds curve is once again well below the dot plot. We continue to see upside in yields if and when the
market becomes more convinced that the soft data is right.

Chart 7: Bond yields have pulled back from FOMC highs Chart 8: As the market refuses to price the dot plot
27
25 250 —— Current market pricing

rr Median dot, Mar-17 SEP

—— BofAML forecast

21
19
sn ——UST 10y yield OO
15 # of meetings into tightening cycle
Meoeeeeeseeeeennnnr

(am Se a eo Sy ;

se: S238 S888
Source: Bloomberg

Source: BofA Merl Lynch Global Research, Bloomberg

In Banks, the reoccurring feedback from investors has been that clients have rotated out of US banks and
into European banks. This conflicts with our latest Fund Manager Survey which suggested allocation to
European Banks fell the most of any sector MoM in the first two weeks of March, however, its true

European Banks have quickly reversed the performance gap to US peers. The spread between the SX7E
and S5BANKX Index is back to pre-US election levels.

What the EU banks bulls are saying:
EUR rates are going higher it’s just a matter of timing, positive EPS revisions continue, EU is starting to
see pockets of volume growth and asset yield recovery, credit spreads have been tightening YTD and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014861
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028294.txt,"THE HOUSE OF THE NOBLEMAN
CURATED BY WOLFE VON LENKIEWICZ & VICTORIA GOLEMBIOVSKAYA

PRESS CLIPPING (INTERNET)

artnet

http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/reviews/jones/frieze-art-week10-22-10.as

LONDON DISPATCH

by Laura K. Jones

Powerless against the magnetic force towing them in to the bowels of Regent’s Park, 60,000 visitors to the eighth
edition of the Frieze Art Fair were faced with a decision. What to buy from an array of works whose combined
price came to $365 million?

Would it be The True Artist Helps the World by Revealing Mystic Truths, a sprawling Damien Hirst cabinet
containing a school of pickled fish, priced at $5.6 million? The huge work turned out to be the star sale of the fair,
as was widely reported, when it was flogged immediately from the White Cube stand during the Frieze preview.
Apparently, the cynical press refers to the vernissage as ""Billionaires Day,"" and indeed, attendees included Claudia
Schiffer, Charles Saatchi, Steve Cohen (a first timer to the fair) and Dasha Zhukova.

So powerful has Frieze become that commercial galleries, public spaces and auction houses now tie their activities
to it more than ever. Off-site auctions saw Phillips de Pury selling David Hockney’s Autumn Pool for $2 million and
Christie’s flogging Andreas Gursky’s photograph of the New York Stock Exchange for $700,000, almost three times
its estimate.

Harry Blain and Graham Southern, former directors of Haunch of Venison, inaugurated their new gallery,
BlainSouthern, with ""Creation Condemned,"" a hypnotic and troubling show by Mat Collishaw of images of pole
dancers, frenzied burning butterflies and the great ravines that were left when the Taliban destroyed the Bamiyan
Buddhas. Fusing symbols of decadence and decay, Collishaw makes lithophanes -- in this case, images etched in
thin, translucent Corian, lit from behind with slowly pulsating lights. Blain and Southern afterwards invited the art
world to the Ivy Club until the early hours of the next morning.

Then, it was onwards and upwards to ""The House of the Noble Man,"" a super-slick exhibition in an 18th-century
Cornwall Terrace townhouse near to the Frieze site (an address, according to the Art Newspaper, thought to be
being prepped for sale to former U.S. president Bill Clinton) that was co-curated by polymath artist Wolfe
Lenkiewicz and Victoria Golembiovskaya. The show felt like serious money, including as it did Andy Warhol works
I’d never even seen images of before, plus things by Poussin, Manet, Cézanne, Picasso, Hirst and Kippenberger.

Over its five floors, ""Noble Man"" also housed work from the Saatchi Gallery's ""New Sensations 2010"" exhibition of
graduating students. Stand-out pieces included So Over, a room full of animal hides by Kate Surridge, a sculpture
student at Slade School, and / Used to Think, an exceptional cautionary film about the bleeding-eyed X Factor
generation by a man called Lee Holden. Amazingly sinister, the slo-mo montage included images of Britney
Spears, a live lobotomy, a childlike Japanese robot and a woman suffering paranoid delusions, all to a haunting
soundtrack of modern music and computer sounds.

14

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028294
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018814.txt,"General Information 4

Purpose of the Appraisal

The purpose of the appraisal is to develop an opinion of the market value of the leased fee (going
concern) interest in the property as of the effective date of the appraisal, November 25, 2015. The
date of the report is December 15, 2015. The appraisal is valid only as of the stated effective date or
dates.

Basis of Value

Market value is defined as:

“The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all
conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and

assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of
a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:

e Buyer and seller are typically motivated;

¢ Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own
best interests;

e Areasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;

e Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements
comparable thereto; and

e The price represents the norma! consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or
creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.”

(Source: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 12, Chapter |, Part 34.42[g]; also Interagency Appraisal and
Evaluation Guidelines, Federal Register, 75 FR 77449, December 10, 2010, page 77472)

Definition of Property Rights Appraised

Leased fee interest is defined as, “A freehold (ownership interest) where the possessory interest has
been granted to another party by creation of a contractual landlord-tenant relationship (i.e., a lease).”

Lease is defined as, “A contract in which rights to use and occupy land or structures are transferred by
the owner to another for a specified period of time in return for a specified rent.”

(Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois,
2010)

Definition of Going-Concern Premise

Going-Concern Premise is defined as, “one of the premises under which the total assets of a business
can be valued; the assumption that a company is expected to continue operating well into the future
(usually indefinitely). Under the going-concern premise, the value of a business as a going concern is

equal to the sum of the value of the tangible assets and the value of the intangible assets, which may

IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018814
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012859.txt,"over 500 prisoners from medium security prisons, 60-80% believed that they would find a place to live as
well as employment once released, whereas less than 30% felt that they would commit another crime.
Prisoners also felt that they were much less likely to commit another crime than other prisoners. Thus,
whether prisoners were evaluating their own chances of success or their success relative to others, they
were living with a distorted narrative. The shorter the criminal record, the more distorted the narrative.
Repeated experience with crime appears to anchor the narrative in a more realistic assessment of the
future.

Certain experiences can also enhance positive illusions by giving individuals an unrealistic sense
of self-control, along with a distorted expectation that future outcomes are highly deterministic. For
example, people who are wealthy, highly educated, part of a dominant group, or citizens within a society
that values independence, are more likely to believe that they have control over the future and are more
likely to express optimism and high self-esteem. These attitudes often lead to a boosted sense of control
and an illusory sense of control over future outcomes. The American psychologist Nathanael Fast ran a
series of experiments to further explore the relationship between power and illusory control, specifically
asking whether subjects endowed with power expect control over outcomes that are strictly due to chance
or that are unrelated to the domain of power. Across each study, whether subjects recalled a personal
situation where they were in power or had to imagine being in power, they were more likely than those in
a subordinate position to express confidence about the outcome of rolling a six-sided die, predicting the
future of a company, and influencing the results of a national election. Power and winning distort, a tale
that has been told and retold countless times in the annals of industry and warfare. As the American
business administration scholars Francesca Gino and Gary Pisano note, the business world is full of cases
where leaders and leading companies crash because they fail to examine the causes of success. They
assume, for example, that their success is entirely due to their brilliance, control over the market, and the
weakness of the competition, as opposed to a shot of good luck. So too goes the story of unexamined war
victories, as supremely confident generals discount relevant information about their opponents, leading
battalions on a death march. Our willingness to accept victories without question stands in direct contrast
with our motivation to scrutinize failures, drilling down for explanations or causes. When we lose or fail
in some way, the negative emotions accompanying this experience focus our attention on working out an
explanation. When we win, we bask in the glory, fueled by the brain’s chemicals and the body’s
hormones. This physiological orchestration sets up the positive illusion of overconfidence, a winning
card in many competitive arenas, and a disaster in others.

Recall from chapter 1 that our brains, and the brains of other animals, are configured to reward
victory with a cascade of hormonal and neurobiological changes. Winning delivers a shot of testosterone,

and so too does observing others win. Winning also delivers a shot of dopamine, further generating a

Hauser Chapter 3. Ravages of denial 113

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012859
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029079.txt,"Bannon: It’s a great question. I certainly think secularism has sapped the strength of the
Judeo-Christian West to defend its ideals, right?

If you go back to your home countries and your proponent of the defense of the Judeo-
Christian West and its tenets, often times, particularly when you deal with the elites,
you're looked at as someone who is quite odd. So it has kind of sapped the strength.

But I strongly believe that whatever the causes of the current drive to the caliphate was —
and we can debate them, and people can try to deconstruct them — we have to face a very
unpleasant fact: And that unpleasant fact is that there is a major war brewing, a war that’s
already global. It’s going global in scale, and today’s technology, today’s media, today’s
access to weapons of mass destruction, it’s going to lead to a global conflict that I believe
has to be confronted today. Every day that we refuse to look at this as what it is, and the
scale of it, and really the viciousness of it, will be a day where you will rue that we didn’t

act [unintelligible].

“The way that the people who ran the banks
and ran the hedge funds have never really been
held accountable for what they did has fueled
much of the anger 1n the tea party movement 1n
the United States.”

Questioner: Thank you very much. I’m [unintelligible]. I come from Slovakia. This is
actually the source of my two very quick questions. Thank you very much for the work
that you do to promote the Judeo-Christian values in the world. I really appreciate it, and
I also feel that the danger is very high. I have two minor questions, because you have
mentioned, in terms of UKIP and Front National [unintelligible]. From the European
perspective, listening to the language which has become more and more radical from
these two parties, especially before the European Parliament elections, I’m just
wondering what are your plans on how to help these partners from Europe to maybe

focus on the value issues and not with populist? And also it goes in terms — you have

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029079
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033218.txt,"From: Larry Visoski 
Sent: 2/1/2017 1:24:27 AM 
To: Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: President PBI FYI 
Jeffrey 
Trump in PBI Fed 3rd thru 5th,. FYI„ 
When PresTrump is visiting MarLago PBI there will be flight restrictions flying in and out of palm beach„ due 
to location of MarLago,. 
There will be GateWay airports you have to depart from in order to land PBI„ 
Teterboro is a gateway departure airport, requires 24 hour notice just like our DCA program, 
When Trump is in MarLago, we will be unable to land in Palm Bch departing from LSJ„ we can land Fort 
Lauderdale Excutive airport, which isn't bad, they are offering $2.76 fuel price this weekend„ 
Same with departure from PBI, need 24 hour notice when President is in town„ 
See message from PBI Port: 
Important Message: All Palm Beach County Airport Users 
We are getting word and expecting a President of the United States (POTUS) visit to PBI / Mar-a-
Lago from Feb 3, 2017 (afternoon?) until Feb. 5, 2017. Times to be established. 
Expect the FAA's Temporary Flight Restriction paperwork to be posted at least 72 hours prior to the POTUS 
arrival. 
The following two airports are in the inner core, inside lONM TFR. 
PBI Airport; All General Aviation traffic into PBI must clear TSA designated ""Gateways"" for both arrival and 
departures into and out of PBI. Departure Gateways - We expect the Gateways to be established at the multiple 
locations at PBI with TSA operating from 0800-1700 and requires prior reservation (24hrs) with TSA. Arrival 
Gateways — Expect Ft. Lauderdale International Airport (FLL) and Orlando Int'l (MCO). Also expecting 
Teterboro, Dulles, and White Plains as additional gateways. 
LNA Airport; As initially established by the USSS, the Palm Beach County Park Airport (LNA) in Lantana, 
FL will be closed to all departures and flight training. Only arrivals into LNA that have gone through the TSA 
Gateway program at one of the designated airports (FLL/MCO) may fly into LNA during the TFR. 
The 30NM outer core will also be in effect and measures will be posted in the FAA NOTAM/TFR release. 
Please share this advisory with all aviation users. 
Regards, 
Peter E. Labbe, Director 
Operations & Security 
Department of Airports 
Palm Beach International Airport 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033218 
Sent from my iPhone 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033219 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012681.txt,"our follow up telephone conversation after the meeting, a plea to two federal misdemeanors was
never extended or meant as an offer.

We also would reiterate that the agreement to Section 2255 liability applies to all of the minor
girls identified during the federal investigation, not just the 12 that form the basis of an initial
planned charging instrument.

As you know, the ability to engage in flexible plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the
return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a
Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state
prosecution.

Please let us know your client’s decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S.
Attorney Acosta who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a
non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this time, he is not inclined to
meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein.

Sincerely,

R. Alexander Acosta
United States Attorney

By:
Matthew Menchel —
Chief, Criminal Division

cc: Roy Black

Gerald Lefcourt

R. Alexander Acosta
Jeffrey Sloman
Andrew Lourie

A. Marie Villafafia

Margot Moss, Esq.

Fowler White Burnett, PA
Espirito Santo Plaza

1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor
Miami, FL 33131

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012681
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011130.txt,"(A1.1), (A1.6), (A1.7) and (A1.8) are alternative statements of the total return

truism.

In general, define g(Q)=Q/Q for any variable Q. Note again that g in this book

means growth rate of capital g(K,) rather than output. g in macro tradition usually
means growth of output g(Y). Total capital K,. is the sum of human capital H and

physical capital K. Their outputs respectively are work W and (net) profit P. Their
counterparts to (A1.1) and (A1.6a) are

W=H+F(H), r(H)=g(H)+f(H), P=K+F(K) and r{K)=g(K)+f(K), (A1.8)

where F(H), f(H), F(K) and f(K) are respectively “human cash flow”, “human cash

yw tt

flow rate”, “physical cash flow” and “physical cash flow rate”.

Present Value and Present Cost

If there were no such thing as time preference, present and future value would be
the same. All economists known to me concede that we prefer present goods to
future ones, although some like Joseph Schumpter have seen no good reason why. |

suggest a reason in next generation theory.

Present value theory, understood in essence by the Sumerians, considers what we

now call future positive cash flows which are expected to be generated from

external investments (transfer in, negative cash flow) made now or earlier. At the

differential (infinitesimal) scale, we can write the associated future value as
dFV(z)=F (z)dz (2.1)

at future moment z. The basic idea of present value PV is

APPENDIX A: The Argument in Notation 3/7/16 4

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011130
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020353.txt,"201

“Tt was the information in his head that we wanted.” Cherkashin said that as KGB rarely got
access to any NSA officer, it was worth the risk. So he was given $5,000 in cash and a plane
ticket to Vienna, where he was domiciled at the residence of the Soviet ambassador to Austria. A
KGB’s electronic communications expert, Anatoly Slavnov, was then sent to Vienna to supervise
the Pelton debriefings. The debriefing sessions, which went on for 15 days, were from 8 AM to 6
PM. In them, Pelton managed to recall Project A, a joint NSA-CIA-Navy operation in which
submarines surreptitiously tapped into Soviet undersea cables in the Sea of Okhotsk, which
connected a to the Soviet Pacific Fleet's mainland headquarters at Vladivostok. Pelton received
another $30,000 from the KGB.

“Did the information in his head proved valuable?” I asked.

“As long as the NSA didn’t know the tap was compromised by Pelton, we could use the cable
to send to the NSA the information we wanted it to intercept.” He said while actual NSA
documents would have proved more useful than someone’s memories, “Our job is to take
advantage of whatever we can get.”

Two years later, Pelton was again flown to Vienna for a follow-up debriefing to see if he could
recall any further details. Finally, in 1985, Pelton was arrested by the FBI and, like Ames and
Hanssen, sentenced to life imprisonment.

Looking at his watch, Cherkashin politely excused himself, saying he had work to do. On
parting, I signed a copy of my book on Angleton for him and thanked him for his insights.

Through the eyes of the KGB, a penetration of American intelligence was clearly
opportunistic. If these practices continued, they put the Snowden case in a new light for me. If
Russian intelligence considered it worthwhile to send an ex-civilian worker at the NSA, such as
Ronald Pelton, from Washington D.C. 2,000 miles to Austria so that its specialists could debrief
him on the secrets he held in his head, it would have an even greater interest in exfiltrating
Snowden from Hong Kong to get, aside from his documents, whatever secrets he held in his head.
If Russian intelligence was willing to opportunistically accept the delivery of U.S. secrets from an
unknown espionage source that it neither recruited nor controlled, such as Hanssen, it would have
little hesitancy in acquiring the secrets that Snowden had stolen on his own volition, even if
Snowden acted for idealistic reasons. If Russian intelligence focused its search pattern on
disgruntled American intelligence workers, such as Ames, it is plausible that it spotted Snowden
through his Internet rants against U.S. surveillance. Even if it had missed Snowden in Hawaii, a
disgruntled ex-civilian employee at the NSA would have received its full attention after he
contacted Russian officials in Hong Kong. While the tactics of the SVR may have changed since
Cherkashin retired, its objectives remained the same. And the NSA remained its principal target.
Nor is there any reason to doubt that it still measures success in its ability to obtain, by whatever
means, the secret sources and methods of its adversaries. Snowden was in a position, both with
the documents he had taken and the knowledge he had in his head, to deliver the KGB such a

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020353
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018800.txt,"5. FORUM SHOPS AT CAESARS PALACE
Forum Shops at Caesars Palace, originally
constructed in 1992 and expanded in phases
during 1997 and 2004, was the first major
specialty retail development on Las Vegas
Boulevard. Forum Shops has a prominent
position on the Strip, situated on the west
side of Las Vegas Boulevard, north of
Flamingo Road, between Caesars Palace
and The Mirage, and is configured with a
highly “themed” retail and entertainment
environment. The property is 99% leased,
attracting an estimated 22 million visitors
per year and is generally considered the
most dominant retail center on the Strip
with 150 specialty tenants that include
Anthropologie, Jimmy Choo, Coach, Louis
Vuitton, Montblanc, John Varvatos, Victoria’s
Secret, Versace, Bvlgari, Cartier, De Beers,
Harry Winston, Tiffany & Co., Abercrombie
& Fitch, Armani Exchange, Brooks Brothers,
Zegna and Cheesecake Factory. Tenant
sales at Forum Shops at Ceasars Palace are
approximately $1,000 to $1,200 per square
foot with average rents ranging from $100 to
$125 per square foot.

6.THE GRAND CANAL SHOPPES

Opened in 1999, the Grand Canal Shoppes
at the Venetian was fully leased after three
months. Fashioned after the Forum Shops,
the property is heavily themed with a canal
flowing through the middle of the concourse
area. The property consists of 536,890 square
feet including mezzanine spaces with current
rents ranging from $85 to $110 per square
foot. Average tenant sales range from $900
to $950 per square foot, and as a result of
the project’s immediate success, a second
phase connected via pedestrian bridge to
the Palazzo Resort was recently developed
and dubbed Shoppes at Palazzo. The project
is currently 94% leased and includes key
tenants; Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, bebe,
Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf, Cache, Sephora
and Valentino.

7.THE SHOPPES AT PALAZZO

Delivered in 2007 with a Grand Opening
in January 2008, the 363,714-square-foot
Shoppes at Palazzo is situated within the
Palazzo Resort and is an expansion of the
highly successful Grand Canal Shoppes. The
Shoppes at Palazzo is a three-story enclosed
specialty center themed,
decorative characteristics intended to capture

with heavily

the essence of Italy. The center is anchored
by Las Vegas’ first Barneys New York and
features many premier luxury’ brands
including Jimmy Choo, Burberry, Van Cleef
& Arpels and Piaget. Upscale restaurants
include Emeril Lagasse’s Table 10, Wolfgang
Puck’s Cut and Shimon Bokovza’s Sushi
Samba. The center is currently 89% occupied
with tenant sales ranging from $900 to $925
per square foot and rents ranging from $80
to $100 per square foot.

8. FASHION SHOW MALL

Fashion Show Mall, originally developed in
1981, was expanded in two phases during
2002 and 2003 to its current size of 1.9 million
square feet. The property has a significant
presence along the Strip, with a 600-foot
canopy structure shading the outdoor
plaza area fronting Las Vegas Boulevard.
The project includes seven department
store anchors’ including Nordstrom,
Bloomingdale’s, Macy’s and Neiman
Marcus, as well as 250 specialty stores and
restaurants. Fashion Show Mall reports
tenant sales ranging from $802 to $983 per
square foot and average rents ranging from
$80 to $88 per square foot.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018800
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011124.txt,"greatest at what he does within the bounds he chooses to set. But I like answers as

well as questions. The five in my pantheon give me those.

Mozart is unrivalled at what he does because no one else plays the same game. What
other composer has put such a premium on delicacy, on poise, on self-effacement?
That doesn’t deny that he was a red-blooded mensch who loved hijinks and good
times as much as the rest of us. His Rondo alla Turca is one of many masterpieces
showing that side. But it only rounds out the impression of a flawless dinner
companion. A maxim of classicism in the Greek spirit is “nothing in excess”. Mozart's

exuberance and hijinks were just the right amount.

He was the master of moderation. His operas put passion mostly in the mouths of
clowns and villains such as Papageno and Osmin and Queen of the Night. His
sympathetic sorts have feelings too, but keep them circumspect. The perfect
companion cares first about our feelings, not his. Mozart remains that even on our
journeys together through the stars. We are kept safely away from the heat. We are
allowed to feel anxiety because the world is so far below. That was half the point of
the trip. The other half is the happy ending as he leads us safely home. Anxiety, but

not in excess.

That shows him as the master of levitation. Richard Strauss gives the example of
Susanna’s aria “Voi che sapete” (you who know) from Figaro, an innocent ditty
which somehow never lands on the tonic (home note) until the end. The beginning
of Eine Kleine Nachtmusik (a little night music) does this again. But the slow

movements of his piano concertos show it best.

Mozart is not my pantheon, even so. He is moderation in excess. I like the game the
others all play. I like a sense of the first person singular. The five in my pantheon
also take us through the stars. But they take us closer. We feel the heat because they
do. Listen to Bach’s chaconne for solo violin, or passacaglia and fugue for organ.

Listen to the heilige dankgesang (holy song of thanksgiving) from Beethoven’s

Chapter 10: Three Pantheons 2/10/16 2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011124
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012695.txt,"outside. Two hundred swells become party prisoners and resign to just
having an absolute ball till 5:@@am. Once again, this is the most star
studded party in town.

Saturday, February 26°"", 2011

The sun comes up and dries up all the land. IAC chairmen and owner of
The Newsweek/Daily Beast Barry Diller and his designer wife Diane Von
Furstenberg host their annual lunch for Graydon Carter in their
Coldwater Canyon home. Barry introduces me to his star guest, Governor
Jerry Brown, just elected to his third (nonconsecutive) term as
California Governor. Diane’s children, Alex and Tatiana, along with
their children comprise three generations of guests, which makes this
party so special.

Like last year, enormous clear plastic tents are erected on the hill
near the house. Long wooden picnic tables covered with yellow flowers
sit on oriental rugs, covering the soggy ground. Terrines of hot soup,
platters of sausages, fried chicken and salads are beautifully arranged
on an endless buffet. Everyone wears winter clothes; comfy sweaters and
sensible shoes. I arrive in a fur coat.

Barry and Diane’s loyal friends have been coming to this party for over
fifteen years. Everybody knows everybody and it doesn’t matter if you
have a hit film or TV show this season. Oprah Winfrey kisses David
Geffen, casually chats with former Disney CEO Michael Eisner and current
Sony chief Sir Howard Stringer. Brett Ratner arrives with his house
guest Jean Pigozzi who is allowed to photograph everyone. Graydon greets
people with wife Anna and Fran Lebowitz by his side.

Ingrid Sischy and Sandy Brant, Rupert Murdoch, Ron Meyer, Bryan Lourd
Francesco Clemente with his twin boys and Tom Ford chat each other up.
People watching include the pregnant Victoria and David Beckham with
Lynn Wyatt, Liv Tyler, Vincent Gallo, Eva Longoria, Larry Gagosian and
Shala Monroque, Ben Silverman, Debbie and Allen Grubman, Tobias Meyer
and Mark Fletcher and Stephen Gaghan and Mini Mortimer wearing her
oversized cat glasses.

Bruce Cohen has invited me to the Oscar broadcast rehearsal. This is a
special honor. There are metal barricades leading up to the credentials
trailer. High-tech security includes photos and computer background
checks. The only thing they don’t do is pat me down and ask for
fingerprints. Once inside the Kodak Theater’s massive auditorium, I find
a seat next to Bruce’s proud parents. I watch Josh Brolin and Javier
Bardem come out in white dinner jackets and flub their lines as they
pretend to present Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Original Screenplay.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012695
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020347.txt,"193

Yet, if not for the “special operation”, he could have easily gone by foot to Terminal E. It was,
as I found, only a nine minute walk through the transit passageway in which one does not have to
show a passport. But that raises the question: Was Snowden’s plan really to go to Ecuador?

Consider Snowden’s putative motivation in seeking sanctuary in Ecuador: his safety. Yet,
Snowden assessed that he would be vulnerable to capture by the U.S. government in Ecuador. “If
they [the U.S. Government] really wanted to capture me, they would’ve allowed me to travel to
Latin America, because the CIA can operate with impunity down there,” he explained in a
recorded interview with Katrina vanden Heuvel, the editor of Zhe Nation, in 2014, He had
previously discussed the likelihood of his being captured in Ecuador with Julian Assange in Hong
Kong in June 2013 before his departure for Moscow. He also told Alan Rusbridger, the editor of
the Guardian, that he considered that he was at risk in Latin America. This vulnerability was no
minor matter to Snowden. He told Glenn Greenwald in Hong Kong, before arranging to fly to
Moscow, that his “first priority” was his own “physical safety.” Since he did not believe Ecuador
was a Safe place for him, why would he leave the comparative safety of Russia and risk being
kidnapped by American forces in Latin America?

Nor was a U.S. passport a prerequisite for U.S. citizens flying to Havana in 2013. Since the
State Department did not sanction travel to Cuba for the general public, the vast majority of
Americans going to Cuba obtained a travel document from a Cuban consulate so the Cuban entry
stamp would not be marked in their passport.) So Snowden, if he really had intended to fly to
Cuba, only needed this document. He had over a month to obtain it from the Cuban consulate in
Hong Kong. But he did not. He could also have obtained a visa to Ecuador at its consulate in
Hong Kong. But he did not. According to his lawyer Kucherena, who closely examined his
passport in July 2013, Snowden had no visas at all. Unlike his words, Snowden’s actions were
with any plan to go to any place in Latin America.

Shortly after the “special operation,” a tip was placed on a publicly-accessible Russian website
saying that Snowden was booked on the Aeroflot flight SU-150 to Cuba on June 24th. In
response to this anonymous tip, Russian and foreign news organization in Moscow ordered their
reporters to buy tickets on that flight With their tickets, reporters swarmed into the departure area
of the airport in such numbers that the police had to set up cordons. They checked all the VIP
lounges, restaurants, rest rooms and boarding area for the next seven hours, but Snowden was
nowhere to be found. A Russia Today reporter later said “It was a total madhouse. Everyone was
screaming ‘Snowden’ at the airport ground staff.” Over a hundred reporters actually boarded the
plane.

In fact, Snowden had never checked in for that flight and, as far as is known, was never seen in
terminal E. Only after the plane took off did the journalists realize Snowden was not aboard it.
All they could do was photograph two of the unoccupied seats, 17A and 17 C, which they
reported in tweets were Snowden’s and Harrison empty seats. By the time the plane landed in
Cuba Aeroflot denied that anyone named Snowden had ever been booked on any of its flight to

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020347
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018291.txt,"Chapter Four: The Jaws of Connection
In which the Seventh Sense explains the strange, new way power behaves on networks.
1.

The Envoy, Frank Wisner Jr., had gotten the phone call on a Thursday, late in the
afternoon, and within a few hours he was on a plane. It was an unusual request from
the White House and from the State Department - and though he was a man who
had lived a life of many unusual requests, he knew that this one had a certain
significance, a weight you might say, if you were the sort of man who measured such
things in human lives.

The Envoy was such a man. His father, Frank Wisner Sr., had been one too. Senior
was one of the most famous and effective of America’s Cold War spies. He’d run the
Office of Special Services in Southern Europe during World War Two and then built
operations for the Central Intelligence Agency in the years after. He was a tough
man, from a generation of Americans that had fought and won wars and who,
unquestioningly, weighed their actions in human lives. As a spy in Romania in 1940,
Wisner Sr. had watched the Red Army, like some sort of sick machine, round up and
then execute scores of his friends. The course of his life was set. “Wisner landed like
a dynamo,” William Colby - a future CIA director who worked for Senior - observed.
“He started operating in the atmosphere of an order of the Knights of Templar, to
save Western freedom from Communist darkness—and war.”®°

Frank Wisner Jr., was known too as a dynamo. He was 72 in the winter of 2011
when the White House called. He’d had already a storied career as a diplomat,
following a rough trace of his father’s man-on-a-mission trajectory, also with a bit of
that secretive Knights of Templar feeling: Princeton, Vietnam, the Philippines, the
halls of the State Department in Foggy Bottom. Wisner had become the first phone
call for some of America’s leading corporate figures when they found themselves
billions of dollars backwards in some strange land, even as he’d remained closely in
touch with the most explosive policy puzzles. Iran. North Korea. He was a voluble
and opinionated man, but somehow also discreet, exact and patient. The
combination made him at once totally reliable and a great deal of fun. He had been,
over the years, a warm and personable figure in my own life, the sort of man who
took the long view of any problem, who lay his hand comfortably on your knee with
reassurance when some promise came undone and threatened a bit of chaos. He
was like an ideogram of reliability: Bukly, bald, coiled, loyal. He’d seen it all, you felt.

Frank Wisner Jr. had served as Ambassador to Egypt for half-a-decade in the 1980s.
Almost inevitably, his careful manner and easy charm led him into a close
relationship with Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian president. Mubarak was an urbane
former fighter pilot who had come to sudden and surprising power after the

80 “Wisner landed”: William Colby, Honorable Men: My Life in the CIA (New York
1978), 73

59

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018291
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014875.txt,"Adding Hess to BofAML US1 list

Inflection point

Over the past six months Hess has proven to be one of the most volatile stocks in the
sector, facing extraordinary headwinds from a significant increase in short interest that
has exaggerated volatility of what is already one of the more highly levered oil stocks in
the sector. From discussions with investors, the arguments against Hess begin and end
with a combination of declining production and expanding balance sheet — all part of the
deliberate portfolio choices that favored completing major projects at the expense of
short cycle production.

This cycle ends in 2Q17 with an expected rebound in oil and gas production starting in
2H17 and critically, an inflection in free cash flow that by our estimates should return
Hess to free cash flow with the flexibility to re-up investment in the Bakken. We thus
view Hess as a dangerous short for investors seeking to hedge other portfolio positions.

Exhibit 1: Short interest ratio (days to cover) US oils Exhibit 2: Hess short interest ratio (mm shares)
14.0
35
12.0
30
10.0
25
8.0
20
6.0
15
4.0
10
2.0
5
On ZQwWaxsgograoc exe zZosQruda uguonw
Secoe€suorkxerosreeraxGomaatitgua 0
ae SARA Se oP oe Oo peewee Jan-10 Jan-11. Jan-12. Jan-13 Jan-14. Jan-15 Jan-16— Jan-17
Source: Bloomberg; BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research estimates Source: Bloomberg; BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research estimates

In our view, any meaningful reduction in short interest could drive an outsize response
to the improving operating outlook that we expect to start in 2H17 and can be
summarized as follows:

« By our estimates, oil and gas production troughs in 2Q17 as Bakken production
stabilizes before recovering through year-end. With start-up of the first of two
major projects (NMB') and incremental production in the US GoM, we
anticipate growth in oil and gas production of ~60,000boepd or 22% between
2Q17 & 4Q17.

« Planned increase in Bakken rig count points to an exit rate of ~105-110
kboepd up from 90-95 kboepd in 1Q17 for an intra-year growth rate of ~16%
underpinned by a step up to 6 rigs from 2 at the start of the year. We expect
Bakken growth to continue in 2018 and 2019 at ~16% yoy with upside from
larger completions.

Management guidance suggests exit rate production in 2017 of ~335,000 boepd; start-
up of the second of Hess’ major projects (Stampede) adds 15,000 boepd from 1H18
(est); along with a resumption of growth by resurgent operator Aker BP at Valhall (Hess
64%) we expect top line growth of 15% in 2018 with a FY contribution and continued
Bakken ramp contributing to ~10% growth in 2019 including first oil from Guyana.

‘North Malay Basin, adding 20,000 boepd starting in Sep 2017

Bankof America <>
Merrill Lynch Hess Corp. | 11 April 2017 3

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014875
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028280.txt,"/ BARAK / 146

make to our getting there would no longer be on the battlefield, in the kirya or
around the cabinet table.

As a number of reporters pointed out, when I made the announcement I was
relaxed. I looked content, and I was smiling.

432
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028280
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021587.txt,": be

S
a)
«
er i a,

Page 1

RRKKKKKKEKE CHILD LOCATE HREKKKKEKERK

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

09/30/08 18:57:23

09/30/2008

Case Number: 31E-MM- 108062 Stat Agent Name: Report Date: 09/30/2008 b6
Serial No.: Stat Agent SOC.: Accom Date.: 06/30/2008 b7c
b7E

Does Accomplishment Involve Assisting Agents SOC Subject Name

Drugs... 2 ee ee ew ww = N [i CT

A Fugitive... . 2.2. ae 2 N |

Bankruptcy Fraud. ......2N |

Computer Fraud/Abuse. . ...:N | RA Squad Task Force
Corruption of Public Officials: N | cose oo nendn  SSSEERSEES
Money Laundering. ...... :N | PBC PB2 SSPBC

Sub. Invest. Asst by Other FOs: Used, but did not help
Helped, Minimally
Helped, Substantially

Absolutely Essential

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

FWNDN =
u

FINAN ANALYST
AIRCRAFT ASST
COMPUTER ASST
CONSEN MONITR
ELSUR/FISC
ELSUR/TIII

ENG FIELD SUP
ENG TAPE EXAM
LEGATS ASST.
EVIDNCE PURCH
INFORMANT/CW
LAB DIV EXAMS

LAB FIELD SUP
PEN REGISTERS
PHOTO COVERGE
POLYGRAPH
SRCH WAR EXEC
SHOW MONEY
SOG ASST

SWAT TEAM
TECH AG/EQUIP
TEL TOLL RECS
UCO-GROUP I
UCO-GROUP II

UCO ~ NAT BACK
NCAVC/VI-CAP
CRIM/NS INTEL
CRIS NEG-FED
CRIS NEG-LOC
ERT ASST
BUTTE-ITC
SAVANNAH-ITC
POC-WRCSC

FT. MON-NRCSC
FOR LANG ASST
NON FBI LAB EX

VICT-WITN COOR
10 WANTED FLYR
SARS

CART

ASSET FORF PRO
FORF SUPPORT P
TFOS/CTD
cxS/cTD
INFRAGARD/CYD
OFC/CID

PPP

Living/Deceased: Living
Date Child Located: 06/30/2008

ENTERED UPON RECEIPT

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021587
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023901.txt,"Defining Intelligence 155

one must be able to explain one’s reasoning clearly to those who ask.
And, one must have a knowledge base of relevant information to draw
upon. But our education system, in concentrating only on the knowl-
edge base and not on independent reasoning from that knowledge
base, has ensured that the knowledge base remains incomprehensible
to most people and therefore is immediately forgotten after school is
over.

It would be a good idea to eliminate IQ tests as a measure of intel-
ligence and begin to teach people to do diagnosis, to plan well, to be
able to determine causality, and to clearly explain their reasoning to
others.

Those that cannot learn to do this would rightly be called stupid,
but those who can would rightly be called intelligent.

Degrees of intelligence would be about one’s ability to do this for
more and more complex issues in complex domains.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023901
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020841.txt,"With these trends, USA Inc. will not be immune to the sudden crises that have afflicted others
with similar unfunded liabilities, leverage, and productivity trends. The sovereign credit issues in
Europe suggest what might lie ahead for USA Inc. shareholders — and our children. In effect,
USA Inc. is maxing out its credit card. It has fallen into a pattern of spending more than it earns
and is issuing debt at nearly every turn. Common principles for overcoming this kind of burden
include the following:

1) Acknowledge the problem — some 80% of Americans believe ‘dealing with our growing
budget deficit and national debt’ is a national priority, according to a Peter G. Peterson
Foundation survey in 11/09;

2) Examine past errors — People need clear descriptions and analysis to understand how the
US arrived at its current financial condition — a ‘turnaround CEO’ would certainly initiate a
‘no holds barred’ analysis of the purpose, success and operating efficiency of all of USA
Inc.’s spending;

3) | Make amends for past errors — Most Americans today at least acknowledge the problems
at personal levels and say they rarely or never spend more than what they can afford (63%
according to a 2007 Pew Research study). The average American knows the importance
of managing a budget. Perhaps more would be willing to sacrifice for the greater good with
an understandable plan to serve the country’s long-term best interests;

4) Develop a new code of behavior — Policymakers, businesses (including investment firms),
and citizens need to share responsibility for past failures and develop a plan for future
successes.

Past generations of Americans have responded to major challenges with collective
sacrifice and hard work. Will ours also rise to the occasion?

CB www.kpcb.com USA Inc. xviii

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020841
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024795.txt,"Or
>
A
“Bw
Plan
fon on

SPARC

San Francisco, California
www.sparcsf.com

SPARC operates three cannabis dispensaries. It
also provides lab-testing services. In addition to
the company’s dispensary locations, the com-
pany provides a direct-to-consumer delivery ser-
vice for flower, pre-rolls, concentrates, edibles,
seeds and accessories. The company performs
in-house testing of its products and operates its
own cultivation facility.

Steep Hill Labs Ss Steep Hill

Berkeley, California
www.steephill.com

Steep Hill Labs is a cannabis lab-testing
company that tests cannabis and cannabis-
based products for potency, pesticides and
microbiology. The company has developed
QuantaCann2™, an in-field cannabis-testing
technology system; GenKit™, a male cannabis-
plant identification system; and Strain Finger-
print™, a graphical depiction of a strain’s most
common cannabinoids. The company has loca-
tions or licensees nationwide.

© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

CHAPTER VIII Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies 2018

SPECTRUM
KiNG

Spectrum King

Canoga Park, California
www.spectrumkingled.com

Spectrum King is a producer of cannabis grow
lights and accessories. The company offers a
range of full-spectrum LED grow lights and
grow tents. Its products are available through a
network of international distributors.

StickyGuide STICK YGuide

Los Angeles, California
www:stickyguide.com

StickyGuide is a digital media company
that operates an online content and direc-
tory site focused on cannabis consumers. The
companys website provides detailed canna-
bis-strain information as well as reviews. The
company also provides a dispensary locator.
The website maintains an active member base
and an online user-generated content forum.

159

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024795
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020699.txt,"#1 Albert Einstein

Image source: yuyamika7

#2 Johnny Depp

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020699
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030613.txt,"His 2fe FIs fe 2s 2s 2c ois 24s 2s fe 2fs 2s 2fe ois 2fe fs fe 2fs 2s 2c ois 2fe 2k fe of of ofc ois 2fe ois 2fe fs fe oie ois 2fe ois fe 2s 2 2s ois 2s ois 2fe of fe 2s ois 2c ois 2s ois 2 2c ok 2 ok

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

Bis 2fe 2A 24s 2s 2s 24s ois 2fe ois fe 2fs of 2c ois 2fe ois fe of 2s ofc ois 2fe ois fe ois fe 2c ois ofc ois 2fe 2s fe 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe os fe ofc ois 2fe ois 2fe 2s oie 2c ois ofc ois 2fe ois oie 2 ois 2 ok

The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and 1s intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

3s 2fe 2s 24s fs fs 24s ois 2fe 2s fe fs 2s 24s ois 2fe of oye 2fs 2 24s ois 24s ois fe fs 2s ofc ois 2fe of 2fe ofs of 2c ois 2fe fs fe 2s of ofc ois ofc ois 2fe ois fe 2s ois 2c ok oie ois 2s 2k ois 2 ok

The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030613
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011642.txt,"knew that would be a sensitive task. We spoke only briefly before he and
Mookie drove back to the sayeret base to begin more detailed preparations.
Yoni was insistent that he should be in charge. I told him I understood, and I
did. In his position, I would have felt exactly the same way. But for a variety of
reasons, Dan wanted me in command. Still, I stressed my determination not to
detract from his authority. Yoni would lead in the main assault unit. He and
Mookie would choose the other officers and soldiers, decide their roles and take
charge of training, briefing and logistics. I could tell he was still not satisfied.
But I told him and Mookie I’d join them later that night. We could talk further,
ahead of the next full briefing, which Dan had set for nine o’clock on Friday
morning on the sayeret base.

When they left, I joined Dan, Motta and Kuti to go see Rabin. Shimon Peres
was there too. He would later say that, as Defence Minister, he was a crucial
voice in pressing to go ahead with the rescue mission. He’s right, and had he
been sceptical, or opposed the idea of a recuse, 1t would have made things much
more difficult. But his position was far easier than the Prime Minister’s. He
lacked Rabin’s hands-on command experience, his grasp of the details of what
we were proposing to do and the obvious risks. All Israelis were aware of this. I
the operation failed, or if we decided in the end not to attempt it, it would be
Rabin who would bear the responsibility and get the blame.

Even under the best of circumstances, Rabin was naturally cautious — the
flipside of the meticulousness with which he ran through the fine detail of every
military mission. As I remembered from when he was chief of staff, in our
slightly surreal conversation about the danger of a booby-trapped
communications intercept exploding as I defused it, he would focus on
everything that might conceivably go wrong with an operation before approving
it. Now, he was also under huge additional pressure. From the start of the hijack
crisis, there had been calls from the hostages’ families to do something to end
the ordeal. But as I later discovered, one of the leading scientific engineers in
Israel, Yosef Tulipman, had a daughter among the passengers. Like Yitzhak, he
had been a Palmachnik. He’d come to see the Prime Minister and implored him
not to attempt an operation that might endager her or the others. “I demand one
thing only,” he said. “Don’t go on any adventures. Do not play with the lives of
these people, with the life of my daughter.”

After Entebbe, there would be suggestions that Rabin’s readiness to
negotiate with the terrorists had been a ploy, designed to buy time. Yet his
message to us that night was that if there was a military option with a

171
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011642
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020421.txt,"269

CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE

The Russians are Coming

L.

10.

11.

12.

13.

“The break-up of the...”--Nick Allen, “Soviet break-up was geopolitical disaster, says
Putin,” Zhe Telegraph, April 26, 2005

“ Russian units had managed...”-- Adam Entous, Julian E. Barnes and Siobhan
Gorman, “U.S. Scurries to Shore Up Spying on Russia,” Wall Street Journal, March
24, 2013

. “Russian acronym SORM had...”-- Stephen Aftergood, “The Red Web: Russia and the

Internet,” /'AS, October 5, 2015. https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2015/10/red-web/

“William Martin and Bernon Mitchell...”—David P. Mowry, “Betrayers of the Trust,”
Cryptologic Almanac 50th Anniversary Series, (NSA) February 28, 2003

. “Victor Norris Hamilton...”-- Staff, “American Defector Is Found in Russian Prison,”

New York Times, June 4, 1992

“He was found dead of...” Edward Jay Epstein, “The Spy Wars,” New York Times,
September 28, 1980

. “Robert Lipka, a clerk...”—See Robert Lipka Appendix A

“ David Sheldon Boone...”—See David Boone, Appendix A

“Harold Nicholson, the CIA’s deputy...”— Elizabeth Farnsworth, “Update on the Case of
CIA Agent Harold Nicholson,” PBS (Transcript) November 19, 1996. See Also “AFFIDAVIT
IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT, ARREST WARRANT AND SEARCH WARRANTS
UNITED STATES v. HAROLD J. NICHOLSON.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
srv/national/longterm/ciaspy/affidavt.htm

“Well-experienced with false flags...” Edward Jay Epstein, Deception: The Invisible
War Between the KGB and the CIA,(Simon and Schuster, New York) 1989, pp 22-28

“When it comes to recruiting moles...” —Author’s interviews with Angleton.

“The “Trust” deception. ..”-- Edward Jay Epstein, Deception: the Invisible War
between the KGB and the CIA, (Simon and Schuster, New York) 1989, pp 22-28.
Also, Author’s interview with Raymond Rocca, the CIA’s former research chief for
the Counterintelligence staff.

“With “a learning experience...”-- Anonymous, “Out of Control,” NSA.
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB424/docs/Cyber-009.pdf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020421
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028494.txt,"From: Faith Kates 
Sent: 11/23/2017 2:41:19 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Have fun!!! 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 23, 2017, at 8:36 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
david fizel. hanson. trump 
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Faith Kates < 
He's such a snooze who else is down there? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 23, 2017, at 8:18 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
berries color for holiday 
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Faith Kates <__________________________ 
That means glenn check out his red hair!!! 
wrote: 
wrote: 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 23, 2017, at 8:15 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
eva 
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Faith Kates < > wrote: 
Ok dylan will want to see you I always want to see you. Where are you having thanksgiving? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 23, 2017, at 8:12 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
all next week 
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Faith Kates < 
Fun!!! When are you back in NYC? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 23, 2017, at 7:54 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
hope today is fun for you. 
wrote: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028494 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028495 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028496 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026182.txt,"please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026182
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032004.txt,"Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

BS DR 3S Ik DIS IC OIC BIS DIS 54S IC DIS IC 34S BIS DIS 34S 2k DIS ig OIC BIS DIS 3S Dik DIS ik 34S BIS DIC 2S 2k DIC ik 24S IS DIC SIS Die DIC ig 24S IC OIC SIC 2 OIC 2g OIC iS 2IC 2c 2k OIC 2k 2IC ik 2k ic

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032004
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011132.txt,"risk tolerance now. She discounts each expected future flow not by her foreseen
time preference rate then, but by her time preference rate today. It seems to me that
the appropriate discount rate r in (A2.4) is r(x). She will provide for anticipated

changes in her time preference rate by factoring costs of trading the asset if
tradeable, or modifying it if modifiable, into her evaluations of future value F (z)dz,

and so from present value too. I consequently interpret (A2.4) to mean

dPV(x)= F (ze dz and =F (z)dz= APV(x)e 0), (A2.5)

The value of the whole asset V(x) at time x will be the sum or integral of present
values of all foreseen cash flows both negative and positive over (x, w ), where w

(omega) is the foreseen end point of flows. w may be infinity oo . Thus
V(xXJ=PV(x)=[""F(zje"" dz, xx<=z<=0. (A2.6)

The terms value and total capital are interchangeable, as are their notations V and

K

7
Present cost PC(x) evaluates V(x) as the sum or integral of earlier negative cash

flows compounded at rate r since moment of investment u, and not yet

decapitalized in positive cash flow. The counterpart to (A2.1) becomes
diC(u)=F (ujdu and = dPC(x)=dV(x)=dPV{(x), (A2.7)
where IC is what I call “investment cost”. The counterparts to (A2.2) and (A2.3) are

dV(x)=F (uje“*du sands F (ujdu=dV(xJe™™ . (A2.8)

APPENDIX A: The Argument in Notation 3/7/16 6

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011132
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012683.txt,"To “Jey Leto""

cc

10/31/2007 04:33 PM
. bec

Subject Epstein

Jay,

Your understanding from Jack Goldberger conforms to my understanding that Mr. Epstein’s plea
and sentence will take place on the same day. I understand that the plea and sentence will occur
on or before the January 4th date.

Jeff

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012683
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020351.txt,"199

Since Ames had been initially paid by Cherkashin $50,000 in cash for his first delivery, I asked
whether he fit into the category of a disgruntled employee. “Wasn’t he a mercenary/”

“T knew from our intelligence reports that he needed money for debts stemming from his
divorce,” he answered. “But he was also angry at the stupidity and paranoia of those running the
CIA. Ames told me at our first secret meeting that they were misleading Congress by
exaggerating the Soviet threat.” Cherkashin evaluated Ames as a man who felt not only slighted
by his superiors but “helpless to do anything about it” within the bureaucracy of the CIA. “The
money we gave, even if he could spend only a small portion of it, gave him a sense of worth.” He
explained that the KGB had an entire team of psychologists in Moscow that worked on further
exploiting Ames’s resentment at his superiors.

The search for an adversary intelligence officer who resents his service was not limited to KGB
recruiters. It was also the “classic attitude” that the CIA sought to exploit in its adversaries,
according to its former deputy director. “You find someone working for the other side and tell
him that he is not receiving the proper recognition, pay and honors due him,” Michael Morell said,
pointing out that the same “psychological dynamic” could be used to motivate someone to “act
alone” in gathering espionage material.

I next turned to an even more important KGB coup: his Robert Hanssen case. Hanssen was
the FBI counterintelligence officer who worked as a KGB mole for 22 years between 1979 and
2002 and had delivered even more documents to the Russian intelligence services than Hanssen.
“Did Hanssen’s dissatisfaction with the FBI, or his objections to its policies, play a role in his
recruitment?” I asked.

“T didn’t recruit Hanssen,” Cherkashin replied, “He recruited himself. I never even knew his
name or where he worked.” He added: “So I knew nothing about his motivation other than that
he wanted cash.”

“So he was mercenary,” I suggested.

“All we knew was that he delivered valuable documents to us and asked for cash in return.” he
said. “We didn’t control him, he controlled us.”

An uncontrolled mole that provided secrets to the KGB and SVR for 22 years was very
different from fictional moles in the spy movies. I asked whether it would have been better if the
KGB had him under its control.

“Possibly,” Cherkashin answered, “but as it turned out Hanssen was our most valuable
penetration in the Cold War.”

Unlike Ames, whose nine-year career as a mole could be managed by the KGB, Hanssen
decided what secret documents to steal and when to make contact or a delivery. He refused to
even allow the KGB to suggest a site. All the communications with him were by letter or to a

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020351
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018816.txt,"General Information 6

Independence

We hereby confirm that we have no conflicts of interest or material involvement in the property which
is the subject of this valuation; and that we are acting as unbiased, independent, external valuers.

RICS Valuer Registration

We confirm that we are in compliance with the RICS Valuer Registration program, which is mandatory
for RICS members in the Caribbean region.

Currency

Unless otherwise stated, all financial figures in this report are expressed in United States Dollars.

Scope of Work

To determine the appropriate scope of work for the assignment, we considered the intended use of
the appraisal, the needs of the user, the complexity of the property, and other pertinent factors. Our
concluded scope of work is described below.

Valuation Methodology

Appraisers usually consider the use of three approaches to value when developing a market value
opinion for real property. These are the cost approach, sales comparison approach, and income
capitalization approach. Use of the approaches in this assignment is summarized as follows:

Approaches to Value

Approach Applicability to Subject Usein Assignment
Cost Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized

Sales Comparison Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized
Income Capitalization Approach Applicable Utilized

The income capitalization approach is the most reliable valuation method for the subject due to the
following:

e The probable buyer of the subject would base a purchase price decision primarily on the
income generating potential of the property and an anticipated rate of return.

e Sufficient market data regarding income, expenses, and rates of return, is available for
analysis.

The sales comparison approach is not applicable to the subject because:

e® This approach does not reflect the primary analysis undertaken by a typical investor-
purchaser.

® There are insufficient sales of comparable properties in this market from which to derive a
credible value conclusion.

The cost approach is not applicable to the subject considering the following:

iGY American Yacht Harbor Marina

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018816
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028296.txt,"THE HOUSE OF THE NOBLEMAN
CURATED BY WOLFE VON LENKIEWICZ & VICTORIA GOLEMBIOVSKAYA

PRESS CLIPPING (INTERNET)

ARTINEO

http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/36017/artinfo-uks-guide-to-frieze-week-2010

ARTINFO UK's Guide to Frieze Week 2010

By Coline Milliard, ARTINFO UK
Published: October 11, 2010

LONDON— Frieze Week is upon us! Europe's largest contemporary art fair has staked its tent in Regent’s Park,
bringing with it an estimated $375 million in work by brand-name artists and emerging talents alike, and London
is seething with exhibitions and events to welcome the collectors, tastemakers, and various art grandees
descending on the city. What to see? Where to go? ARTINFO UK has a few recommendations.

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13 With still two days to go before Frieze Art Fair opens to the public, today is the perfect
day to indulge in a bit of London tourism, mixing in visits to the city's West End galleries. Stroll down Piccadilly
and stop at Thomas Dane Gallery, on Duke Street, for the Kelley Walker exhibition. On Heddon Street — a
continental oasis at the heart of Central London — Aicon Gallery has put together an excellent exhibition
retracing artist and thinker Rasheed Araeen’s first fifteen years of production, beginning in 1959. Two other good
shows on the same street are Paola Pivi at Carlson and Jimmie Durham at Sprovieri. You can also discover Sadie
Coles’ new space in New Burlington Place, inaugurated with an exhibition of Urs Fisher’s sculptures.

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14 You’ve done Tate Britain, do you really need to go to Tate Modern? Of course you do.
First, the newly opened Gauguin exhibition is stunning and simply impossible to miss (it has been described by
the Times as ""the show of the season — in fact of the whole year). Second, the new commission by Ai Weiwei,
was recently unveiled in Turbine Hall. You can then head north to enjoy Fergus Henderson’s English cuisine at St.
John Bar & Restaurant in Smithfield, before wandering to ROKEBY for their exhibition of German-born, London-
based artist Bettina Buck.

Today is also a good day to see ""The House of the Noble Man,"" an exhibition curated by artist Wolfe von
Lenkiewicz and Russian curator Victoria Golembiovskayan. It includes a Cézanne, £6 million ($9.6 million) worth of
Picasso, as well as pieces by Damien Hirst, Christian Boltanski, Andy Warhol, Gerhard Richter, and many more —
all in the historical setting of Cornwall Terrace as it overlooks Regent’s Park. (This event is by appointment only at
Boswell House, 2 Cornwall Terrace, Regents Park, London NW1. To arrange a visit, register at:
http://www.cornwallterrace.co.uk/boswallhouse/).

16

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028296
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018287.txt,"ability to strike out - a lesson Jomini and Napeoleon expensively re-learned at the
end of their gasping supply lines in Russia in the winter of 1807.75 In our own day,
jet-meshed networks, commercial webs, satellite links and finance platforms span
the omnipresent routes of America’s global reach. So as we consider the information
networks evolving now: the growing connected world that is the largest, fastest,
most comprehensive network in history, we should ask ourselves the question
Jomini might have raised: Will an even greater empire be based on control of
information-powered networks?

This new world of connectivity won’t immediately devour the old. In fact, the classic
and the revolutionary will contend for some time, side by side. Cyberweapons and
nuclear ones in a strange dance, for instance: Imagine that you're ruling a country
with no hope of building your own platforms for medicine, finance, information or
security.’® You will be, as a result, uneasily and permanently dependent on the
nations or groups that do control these elemental, algorithmic and efficient tools. If
you're running a medium-sized country there’s no chance your own IT industry can
develop a search engine with the reach and fluency of Google; or a cybersecurity
system with the omnipresence of some Chinese database. Might this make you more
eager for nuclear weapons? For an atomic hedge against the day you find yourself
threatened with national unplugging? Networks, we'll discover, don’t lift us above
the old conflicts so much as they complicate them. They fill the old hatreds with new
fidelity; sharpen the old grudges and make it easier than ever to slap at the world
when you're angry. While it is tempting to say that we’ve moved from a world of
“cold weapons” like planes and tanks to a world of “hot weapons” where digital light
pulses and biological infections will prevail, really it is the strange blending of these
cold and hot systems that is so interesting, so dangerous. Ever more precise
exploding iron bombs, made from a fusion of GPS data and TNT, will be a part of our
future, as will pathogens tuned by computer and delivered according to network
intelligence about where a contagion might best be started.

Orwell’s well-worn line - “The history of civilization is largely the history of
weapons’ - settles uneasily onto a networked world.’” The networks are, so clearly
already, becoming weaponized. And a great strategist should know and use the
materials of his day. Napoleon had a gunpowder-burn familiarity with his artillery;
Mao possessed a wizened guerilla sensibility. The electric, shifting and shocking
materials of our global networks are going to be used in pursuit of power anyhow,
so we had best consider how to become fluent with their real nature, how turn them
to our advantage - and ideally find a way to use them to so profoundly change the
rules of conflict that hurried, unconsidered and useless reaction will be all our
enemies can manage. Over the centuries shifts in power and wealth were achieved

75 The skeins: John Arquilla and Ryan Nomura “Three Wars of Ideas about the Idea
of War,” Comparative Strategy, 34:2 (2015), 186

76 Cyberweapons: Mary Kaldor, “In Defence of New Wars,” Stability, 2(1) 2013: 4,
pp. 1-16,

77 Orwell’s well-worn line: George Orwell, “You and the Atom Bomb” in George
Orwell: In Front of Your Nose, 1946-1950. (Nonpareil Books 2000) 7

55

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018287
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014863.txt,"° ISP will pay a dividend (confirmed) equivalent to an 8.0% yield vs. a 4.0% European banks
average and on our estimates

° Italian banks are trading at a PNAV discount to ISP but their profitability is half that of ISP's and
their capital is lower

° ISP retains the lowest (gross/net) Italian NPE ratio and in 4Q16 NPE were down yoy by 8%
gross/10% net.

e Shares have suffered from the uncertainty related to a possible tie-up with insurer Generali - still

the seventh worst performing bank in the SX7E YTD

Also remain very bullish on market exposed Nordic banks

This morning we reiterate our preference for Nordic ee wan here for report) with more market

exposed revenues and reiterate our Buy ratings on Danske Bank, Nordea, DNB and SEB ahead of Qi
results. We expect to see good fee /trading income in Q1 on the back of strong AUM and continued high
activity levels.

The relative P/E premium of Nordic banks vs. the sector is now 7% vs. a long term average of 11%. We
also note that Nordic banks are expected to continue to deliver close to 4% better ROTE (2017-19E) and
have a lower beta.

Chart 1: Danske Bank remains best capital return story (Capital buffers as % of market cap) _

30.0
20.8
20.0

11.0 10.8 10.8 10.4 10.3

10.0

0.0
DANSKE SHBA SEBA NDA DNB SWEDA

m Buffer # 17E Div + Buyback (not yet executed)  Buffer+ Divi + Buyback (not executed)

Source: BofA Mernll Lynch Global Research estimates

Kind regards,

Russell Quelch
European Financials Specialist Sales
Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Global Financials Specialist Sales Team:

Russell Quelch - European Banks - London
Juliette Nichols — European Insurance, Div Fins and Real Estate - i 27
ee

Scott Smith - US Financials - New York [aa

The power of global connections™

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014863
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030605.txt,"The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030605
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022811.txt,"﻿From: 	""Saved by Internet Explorer 11""	
Subject: 	Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case | Law.com	
Date: 	Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:51:12 -0500	
                                                                      
 


  
 
 
  
• Menu
 
• Search
  
•  
Law.com
An ALM Exclusive Network 
 
 
 


 
•  
 
Sign In
 
 Subscribe 
 


 


 
• Home
  
• Law Topics
 
 
• Litigation
 
• Transactional Law
 
• Law Firm Management
 
• Law Practice Management
 
• Intellectual Property
 
• Browse All Law Topics ➝

 
• Publications
 
 
• The American Lawyer
 
• New York Law Journal
 
• Connecticut Law Tribune
 
• The Recorder
 
• Browse All Publications ➝

 
• Surveys & Rankings
  
• Events
  
• ALM Intelligence
  
• Verdicts
  
• Legal Dictionary
  
• Law Firms
  
• Lawjobs.com
  
• Legal Recruiters
  
• Law Schools
  
• About Us
 
• Contact Us
 
• Site Map
 
• Advertise
 
• Customer Care
 
• Terms of Service
 
• FAQ
 
• Privacy Policy
 

 
•  Follow Law.com 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 

 
 
Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

 
 


 

 
 
 
 

 
  
• Sign In
 
•  SUBSCRIBE  
 


 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
• Publications
 
• Law Topics
 
• Surveys & Rankings
 
• Events
 
• ALM Intelligence
 
• Verdicts
 
• Legal Dictionary
 
• Law Firms
 
• Lawjobs.com
 
• Legal Recruiters
 
• Law Schools
 
• More +

 




       

 

 
 


 
 


 
 
 
 
 
Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case
 
After first outing herself to defend David Boies in a letter to The New York Times, Sarah Ransome is giving up the pseudonym ""Jane Doe 43"" in a sexual trafficking lawsuit against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
  
 
By Miriam Rozen   | UPDATEDJan 09, 2018 at 12:21 PM | Originally published on The American Lawyer 
 




 
 
 
 
 
      

 
 
X
  
Share with Email
 
 
 
Add a comment... 
Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case After first outing herself to defend David Boies in a letter to The New York Times, Sarah Ransome is giving up the pseudonym ""Jane Doe 43"" in a sexual trafficking lawsuit against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. https://www.law.com/sites/americanlawyer/2018/01/08/client-who-stood-up-for-boies-goes-public-in-sex-trafficking-case/?et=editorial&bu=Law.com&cn=20180109&src=EMC-Email&pt=ALM%20Morning%20Minute?cmp=share_email Send 
sending now...
 
 
Thank you for sharing!
 
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.


 
 
 

David BoiesDavid Boies, Boies Schiller Flexner 
Diego M. Radzinschi/The National Law Journal  

 
“Jane Doe 43″ has formally identified herself as Sarah Ransome in a sexual trafficking lawsuit that her lawyers at Boies Schiller Flexner are pursuing against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
 
In a notice to change the case caption filed Friday in Manhattan federal court, Ransome’s attorneys said she “no longer intends to proceed by way of pseudonym” in the case, which claims Epstein forced her to have sex for money.
 
Defense lawyers for Epstein had argued that Ransome must litigate under her own name after she wrote a Nov. 15 letter to The New York Times, which the Times published, in which she defended Boies Schiller and firm chairman David Boies against criticism stemming from Boies’ work for Harvey Weinstein.
 
Ransome identified herself as Jane Doe 43 in the Times letter, which said Boies “heard me and came to my rescue” when others refused to take her allegations against Epstein seriously. “For the first time in 10 years I finally feel safe because of David Boies and his colleagues,” wrote Ransome, who also said the firm did not charge her legal fees.
 
The letter was prompted by a Nov. 9 Times op-ed by Stanford University law professor Deborah Rhode, titled “David Boies’s Egregious Involvement With Harvey Weinstein.” Written in the wake of revelations in The New Yorker that Boies had engaged private investigators to kill an investigation by Times reporters into Weinstein’s alleged sexual predations, the op-ed suggested that Boies’ work for Weinstein was unethical, partly because the Times’ was a Boies Schiller client.
 
Two days earlier, on Nov. 7, following publication of The New Yorker article, Boies had issued a statement addressed to his firm, stating that Weinstein was no longer a client and stressing that he “would never knowingly participate in an effort to intimidate or silence women or anyone else.”
 
In a Nov. 21 brief in the Epstein litigation, defense lawyer Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP argued that Ransome had never satisfied requirements to file anonymously and had publicly identified herself with her letter to the Times, so she should be required to add her name to the case caption.
 
Sigrid McCawley, a Boies Schiller partner in the firm’s Fort Lauderdale office who represents Ransome along with Boies and others, said her client ultimately chose to go public with her name “in the hopes that her courage will inspire other Epstein victims to speak their truth.”
 
In 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea in Florida for soliciting an underage prostitute, which led to an 18-month jail term and placement on the national sex offender registry. Since then, multiple plaintiffs have filed related complaints against him, including one that includes allegations that President Donald Trump’s winter White House, Mar-a-Lago, was the location of events that led to sex trafficking.
 
Epstein has argued that the court should dismiss the case because Ransome failed to state a substantiated claim and because the claims she makes are barred by the statute of limitations.
 
Steptoe’s Miller had no immediate comment for this report.

 
 
 share on facebook  share on twitter 

 

 
 
 
 
Miriam Rozen


 
 
 
Miriam Rozen  
 
Miriam Rozen covers the business of law with a focus on law firm-client relationships. Contact her at mrozen@alm.com. Twitter: @MiriamRozen.
 
More from this author ›
 


 
 
Dig Deeper
  
• Global Law Firms
 
• Law Firm Management
 
• Law Firm Partners
 





 
 

 

 

 

 
 

  
 
Trending Stories
      
•   
 
 
NY Lawmakers Ask Congress to Pass Marijuana Law Following Sessions Pot Reversal
 
New York Law Journal



 

     
•   
 
 
Greenberg Traurig, the G.O.A.T. of Law Firms?
 
The American Lawyer



 

     
•   
 
 
Milberg Joins Forces With Mass Torts, Personal Injury Firm
 
The American Lawyer



 

     
•   
 
 
Lawyers, Top Brass Among Cuts as Krasner Trims More Than 30 Jobs From DA's Office
 
The Legal Intelligencer



 

     
•   
 
 
Regional Wisconsin Firm Snaps Up 2 Smaller Shops
 
The American Lawyer



 





  
 


 
 


 
 
 

 
 
 
Recommended Stories
 
 



 
 
 
 


 
 
International
 
Am Law Firms Can't Save China-US Deal From CFIUS
 
Anna Zhang  | January 05, 2018 
 
The failure of the proposed $1.2 billion deal between Alibaba affiliate Ant Financial Group and Moneygram raises questions about the future of China-U.S. deals.

 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
New Jersey Law Journal
 
Bar Report - NJSBA offers Disaster Preparedness Planning Guide
 
 New Jersey State Bar Association | January 08, 2018 
 
A natural or man-made disaster raises a number of practical and logistical challenges for law firms.

 
 
 
 


 
 
Daily Business Review
 
2018: Resolve to Modernize Law Firm Management
 
 Luis Salazar | January 08, 2018 
 
The turn of the year is the perfect time to think about starting fresh and trying something new. While you are busy working toward that six-pack, being more mindful, or learning a new language, why not commit to trying something new at your law firm or department? With most legal teams, rigid roles, hierarchical structures, and top-down management are still the norm.

 
 

   
 
 
Featured Firms
 
 
 
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
 
 
2 Oliver St #608
Boston, MA 02109
 
857-444-6468
 
www.marksalomone.com

 
 
Gary Martin Hays & Associates P.C.
 
 
235 Peachtree St NE #400
Atlanta, GA 30303
 
800-898-4297
 
www.garymartinhays.com

 
 
The Law Firm Of Jonathan C. Reiter
 
 
350 5th Ave
New York, NY 10118
 
212-736-0979
 
www.jcreiterlaw.com


 
Presented by BigVoodoo 




    
 
 
Resources
  
•  
 
 
 
 
A Case Study of Patent Abuse: Printing Industry vs Patent Trolls
 
From The TASA Group, Inc.
 
Facing patent infringement allegations? Discover how the printing industry is fighting back against patent trolls that threaten their bottom line and explore possible solutions for your case.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
GRC for GDPR: More Personal Data Visibility with Less Effort
 
From RSA
 
With GDPR implementation and compliance looming on the horizon (May 2018), the time to protect your data is now. Do not wait until it’s too late.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
GDPR Insight: Determining if Contracts are GDPR Compliant and Incident Ready
 
From Seal Software
 
The looming enforcement of the GDPR continues to grow closer. Are you sure your contracts are ready and will avoid fines?
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Leadership in Crisis: Tapping the Collective Strength of the CEO and Board
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
Corporate crises require well-orchestrated teamwork. Learn about the key elements needed in your crisis management plan and how board portals can help you establish crucial communications.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
TAR for Smart People
 
From Catalyst
 
How Technology Assisted Review (TAR) works and why it matters for legal professionals.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
The Price of Convenience: How to Improve Cybersecurity around Board Communications
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
This report provides recommendations for directors to improve cybersecurity practices around board communications to strike the right balance between convenience and security.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Contract Discovery & Analytics in a Nutshell
 
From Seal Software
 
Contract data doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Take advantage of this simple explanation of contract discovery and analytics.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
How the Cloud Can Keep Law Firm Data Safer
 
From AbacusNext
 
Cloud computing is flourishing, but law firms have been hesitant to adopt the tech shift. Learn how advances in cloud computing keeps your firm data safe while offering benefits and cost-savings.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
5 Best Practices for Information Security Governance
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
How does a company most effectively deploy its resources to protect highly sensitive data and information? Here’s five best practices for information security governance for decision makers.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
The Five Data Points Every In-House Employment Lawyer Needs to Know
 
From Littler CaseSmart
 
The role of big data in legal decision-making only continues to grow and those who embrace the opportunities data analytics creates will be best positioned for success.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
How to Manage the Modern Global Law Department
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Is your law department ready to go global? This article provides evaluations and solutions for management to effectively prepare their team to handle the challenges of a global law department.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Debunking Seven Myths About Arbitration and IP Cases
 
From American Arbitration Association
 
Intellectual property disputes are growing in complexity and costs, and businesses are seeking efficient alternatives to litigation. Seven myths about IP arbitration are debunked herein.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
GDPR: What It Means To Your Cybersecurity Strategy
 
From RSA
 
You must take steps now to protect against cyberattacks or risk losing millions in fines once the European Union adopts a new law.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Managing Litigation: E-Discovery Resources Survey Report
 
From Catalyst
 
Learn from the experience of your peers. Find out how legal operations professionals use technology to better manage litigation and internal investigations.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
AI Adoption and Ethical Considerations for In-House Counsel
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
As legal departments start to embrace AI adoption, both opportunities and concerns arise. Learn about possible ethical dilemmas AI raises, potential costs of adoption and 5 things you should do next.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
 
From AbacusNext
 
Learn what happens in ransomware attacks, why your firm is a prime target and preventative solutions to protect your clients and your business from such an occurrence.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Board Portal Buyer's Guide: 5 Essential Qualities
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
Not all board portal applications are created equal. This guide provides essential questions across five categories to help you evaluate and choose the best board portal software for your company.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Using Data Analytics to Increase Profitability
 
From LawyerMetrix
 
Discover how your firm can use data analytics to develop a rigorous growth strategy.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Tips for Drafting Effective Indemnification Clauses
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Although commonly used, indemnification provisions can be complex. Download this sample clause from Practical Law infused with tips to ensure your indemnification clause effectively manages risk.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
What Can AI Do For Your Legal Department?
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
The legal industry is on the cusp of a revolution led by the adoption of AI computers. Learn to boost productivity through many of these practical use cases for AI in your legal department.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Letters of Credit in Commercial Real Estate: A Primer
 
From Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
 
Letters of Credit are becoming more common as foreign investing increases in the U.S. commercial real estate market. Learn tips and guidelines to effectively use a Letter of Credit.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Being Sued for Patent Infringement? Four Issues to Address Early On
 
From Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
 
Have you been sued for patent infringement? Learn about early strategic options and take the first step towards a rigorous defense.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Tips to Navigate New Workplace Protections for Individuals
 
From Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
 
Protections continue to grow for individuals in the workplace in 2017. Learn what these new employment and labor protections mean for your company as well as tips for employers.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Cybersecurity 101: How Law Firms Can Prevent and Respond to Ransomware Attacks
 
From AbacusNext
 
Get up to speed on ransomware attacks, its implications to your firm, how to respond if one occurs and the best cybersecurity steps to protect and prevent one from occurring in the first place.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Customize Your Contract Management Process
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Download this template to track a company's contracts at their various stages, including executed or terminated contracts. The at-a-glance layout allows for quick organization and reference.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
The Future of Artificial Intelligence
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Examine the current state of artificial intelligence and explore the future AI roadmap in this second installment of the exclusive AI series by Thomson Reuters.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Sexual Harassment Prevention Training for Employees
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Be proactive and avoid sexual harassment in the workplace by downloading this sample harassment policy and training presentation to properly prepare your employees.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
U.S. Immigration Solution: Canada is Open for Business
 
From Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
 
In an effort to increase innovation and profits in a burgeoning global economy, companies need to attract and retain a highly skilled immigrant workforce. Could Canada be the solution?
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
U.S. Immigration Solution: Canada is Open for Business
 
From Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
 
In an effort to increase innovation and profits in a burgeoning global economy, companies need to attract and retain a highly skilled immigrant workforce. Could Canada be the solution?
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
5 Secrets to Extracting ROI from Experts
 
From The TASA Group, Inc.
 
Expert witnesses can be crucially valuable to your case or they can do more harm than good. Learn 5 secrets to extracting the best return on investment from experts.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Artificial Intelligence and Legal Technology: To Boldly Go Where No Legal Department Has Gone Before!
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
The legal industry has only begun to realize the potential and impact of AI on day-to-day practice. How will this technology impact the profession?
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Vacation Pay Stay State Laws
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Practical Law Chart: A complete 50-state survey compilation of vacation pay policies
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Elements of Confidentiality Agreements - Definitions of Confidential Information
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Only the smartest companies can both protect that information and leverage it for business opportunities. Do you have updated, current drafts of these important documents?
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Employee Termination Best Practices
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
This resource addresses key issues for employers to consider when terminating an employee and best practices to minimize claims of wrongful discharge.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Fiduciary Duties Overview
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Protect your company and its shareholders by educating directors with an overview of their fiduciary duties and the potential consequences, both personal and for the business.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Complimentary Attorney Client Privilege Checklist
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Keep your communications privileged, and ensure that employees understand their role.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Avoid Social Media Risks in 2017
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
The use of social media by individuals in and outside of the workplace is widespread and continues to grow. Create a Social Media policy that protects your company.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Executive Brief: Knowledge, know-how, and the ability to respond with confidence
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Knowledge, know-how, and the ability to respond with confidence. Learn the keys to position yourself as a trusted corporate advisor.
 
Download Now ›

 


 
 
•  
 
 
 
 
Common Arbitration Misconceptions
 
From American Arbitration Association
 
This white paper discusses what not to believe about arbitration.
 
Download Now ›

 


 

 
  
 
 
ALM Legal Publication Newsletters
 
 
Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.
 
As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

 
Subscribe Now 
Privacy Policy

 



 
 
 
 Follow Us      
 

 
Privacy Policy / Terms of Service 
 
 
 
Publications
  
• The American Lawyer
 
• Corporate Counsel
 
• National Law Journal
 
• New York Law Journal
 
• New Jersey Law Journal
 
• The Recorder
 
• More Publications ›

 
 
Law Topics
  
• Litigation
 
• Transactional Law
 
• Law Firm Management
 
• Legal Practice Management
 
• Cybersecurity
 
• Intellectual Property
 
• More Law Topics ›

 
 
Rankings
  
• AmLaw 100
 
• AmLaw 200
 
• Global 100
 
• National Law Journal 500
 
• Pro Bono Scorecard
 
• The A-List
 
• More Rankings ›

 
 
More
  
• Events
 
• ALM Intelligence
 
• Editorial Calendar
 
• Resources
 
• Legal Dictionary
 
• Jobs
 
• Law Firms
 
• Law Schools

 
 
Law.com
  
• About Us
 
• Contact Us
 
• Site Map
 
• Advertise With Us
 
• Customer Support
 
• Terms of Service
 
• FAQ
 
• Privacy Policy
 


 


 
 
 
 
Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

                 

Content-Type: text/html; charset=""utf-8""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/sites/americanlawyer/2018/01/08/client-who-stood-up-for-boies-goes-public-in-sex-trafficking-case/?et=editorial&bu=Law.com&cn=20180109&src=EMC-Email&pt=ALM%20Morning%20Minute
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-mini-burger-blue.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-search-blue.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/close-btn.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/arrow-open.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-fb.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-tw.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-go.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-li.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-rs.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/logo-alm.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/brand-logos/temp-logo-blue-notag.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in-blue.png
 


Content-Type: image/jpeg
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/405/2018/01/boies-david-Article-201801082208.jpg
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/bb5f7888c30556fe3e54a7733c7b86fc?s=136&d=mm&r=g
 


Content-Type: image/jpeg
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/396/2018/01/Alipay-Article-201801051622.jpg
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/sites/americanlawyer/2018/01/08/client-who-stood-up-for-boies-goes-public-in-sex-trafficking-case/
 


Content-Type: image/jpeg
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2018/01/Salazar-luis-Article-201801081447.jpg
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj02/images/w_thaj02c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan03/images/w_rsan03c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal03/images/w_seal03c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili04/images/w_dili04c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb04/images/w_catb04c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili03/images/w_dili03c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal02/images/w_seal02c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa05/images/w_abaa05c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili02/images/w_dili02c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_litt01/images/w_litt01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc66/images/w_thoc66c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee05/images/w_amee05c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan02/images/w_rsan02c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb02/images/w_catb02c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc65/images/w_thoc65c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa03/images/w_abaa03c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili01/images/w_dili01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_lawy01/images/w_lawy01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc62/images/w_thoc62c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc61/images/w_thoc61c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill03/images/w_sill03c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill02/images/w_sill02c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill01/images/w_sill01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa01/images/w_abaa01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc58/images/w_thoc58c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc49/images/w_thoc49c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc47/images/w_thoc47c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak02/images/w_blak02c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak01/images/w_blak01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj01/images/w_thaj01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc41/images/w_thoc41c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc39/images/w_thoc39c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc26/images/w_thoc26c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc24/images/w_thoc24c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc22/images/w_thoc22c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc21/images/w_thoc21c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc18/images/w_thoc18c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc28/images/w_thoc28c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/gif
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee01/images/w_amee01c.gif
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/temp-logo-blue-notag.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-fb-grey.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-tw-grey.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-go-grey.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-li-grey.png
 


Content-Type: image/png
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-rs-grey.png
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:300,400,700
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/multishared/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.7.0/css/font-awesome.min.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/style.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/responsive.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/header-footer.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/home-brands.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/search.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/instant-insights.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/responsive-fix.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/events-editcal.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bootstrap-datepicker/1.6.1/css/bootstrap-datepicker.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/article.css
 


Content-Type: text/css; charset=""iso-8859-1""
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/css/owl.carousel.css
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://use.typekit.net/qkq4rhw.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.3/jquery.min.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/2.1.0/js/bootstrap.min.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/js/common.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/js/tealium.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/multishared/js/prebid.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/js/cookie-consent.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://store.law.com/Registration/js/TimeConversion.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Content-Location: https://www.almcms.com/contrib/content/falcon-ui/falcon-ui.php
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/js/owl.carousel.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/js/owl.autoplay.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/js/master-article-functions.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/core/jquery.touchSwipe.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/core/underscore.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/core/bootstrap.min.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/core/respond.min.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/falcon/bootstrap.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/falcon/util.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/falcon/contributor.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/core/jquery.history.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/falcon/state_manager.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/falcon/channel_section.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/js/falcon/comment_bug.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/multishared/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js
 


Content-Type: application/octet-stream
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Location: https://www.law.com/assets/multishared/js/sponsorships.js
 


From: ""Saved by Internet Explorer 11""
 Subject: Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case | Law.com
 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:51:12 -0500
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/related; type=""text/html""; boundary=""----=_NextPart_000_0000_01D38927.004C5A10""
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.23651
 



https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-mini-burger-blue.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-search-blue.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/close-btn.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/arrow-open.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-fb.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-tw.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-go.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-li.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-rs.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/logo-alm.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/brand-logos/temp-logo-blue-notag.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in-blue.png






https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/405/2018/01/boies-david-Article-201801082208.jpg






https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/bb5f7888c30556fe3e54a7733c7b86fc?s=136&d=mm&r=g






https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/396/2018/01/Alipay-Article-201801051622.jpg






https://www.law.com/sites/americanlawyer/2018/01/08/client-who-stood-up-for-boies-goes-public-in-sex-trafficking-case/

        
 

 
   
 
 
  
• Menu
  
• Search
   
•  
 Law.com
 An ALM Exclusive Network 
 
  
 

 
 
•  
 
 Sign In 
 
  Subscribe  
 

 
 

 
 
• Home
 
• Law Topics
 
 
• Litigation
 
• Transactional Law
 
• Law Firm Management
 
• Law Practice Management
 
• Intellectual Property
 
• Browse All Law Topics ➝
 
 
• Publications
 
 
• The American Lawyer
 
• New York Law Journal
 
• Connecticut Law Tribune
 
• The Recorder
 
• Browse All Publications ➝
 
 
• Surveys & Rankings
 
• Events
 
• ALM Intelligence
 
• Verdicts
 
• Legal Dictionary
 
• Law Firms
 
• Lawjobs.com
 
• Legal Recruiters
 
• Law Schools
  
• About Us
 
• Contact Us
 
• Site Map
 
• Advertise
 
• Customer Care
 
• Terms of Service
 
• FAQ
 
• Privacy Policy
 

 
•  Follow Law.com 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 

 
 
Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
 
 
 

 
 

    
  
 
  
 
  
   
• Sign In
 
•   SUBSCRIBE  
   
  
 
  

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
• Publications
 
• Law Topics
 
• Surveys & Rankings
 
• Events
 
• ALM Intelligence
 
• Verdicts
 
• Legal Dictionary
 
• Law Firms
 
• Lawjobs.com
 
• Legal Recruiters
 
• Law Schools
 
• More +
  
 

 
 
 
        

 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case
 
After first outing herself to defend David Boies in a letter to The New York Times, Sarah Ransome is giving up the pseudonym ""Jane Doe 43"" in a sexual trafficking lawsuit against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
   
 
 By Miriam Rozen   | UPDATEDJan 09, 2018 at 12:21 PM | Originally published on The American Lawyer 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
 
 
 
X
  
Share with Email
 
  
 
  
 Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case After first outing herself to defend David Boies in a letter to The New York Times, Sarah Ransome is giving up the pseudonym ""Jane Doe 43"" in a sexual trafficking lawsuit against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. https://www.law.com/sites/americanlawyer/2018/01/08/client-who-stood-up-for-boies-goes-public-in-sex-trafficking-case/?cmp=share_email Send 
sending now...
  
 
Thank you for sharing!
 
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
 
 
 
 
 

   David Boies, Boies Schiller Flexner 
Diego M. Radzinschi/The National Law Journal  

 
“Jane Doe 43″ has formally identified herself as Sarah Ransome in a sexual trafficking lawsuit that her lawyers at Boies Schiller Flexner are pursuing against billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
 
In a notice to change the case caption filed Friday in Manhattan federal court, Ransome’s attorneys said she “no longer intends to proceed by way of pseudonym” in the case, which claims Epstein forced her to have sex for money.
 
Defense lawyers for Epstein had argued that Ransome must litigate under her own name after she wrote a Nov. 15 letter to The New York Times, which the Times published, in which she defended Boies Schiller and firm chairman David Boies against criticism stemming from Boies’ work for Harvey Weinstein.
 
Ransome identified herself as Jane Doe 43 in the Times letter, which said Boies “heard me and came to my rescue” when others refused to take her allegations against Epstein seriously. “For the first time in 10 years I finally feel safe because of David Boies and his colleagues,” wrote Ransome, who also said the firm did not charge her legal fees.
 
The letter was prompted by a Nov. 9 Times op-ed by Stanford University law professor Deborah Rhode, titled “David Boies’s Egregious Involvement With Harvey Weinstein.” Written in the wake of revelations in The New Yorker that Boies had engaged private investigators to kill an investigation by Times reporters into Weinstein’s alleged sexual predations, the op-ed suggested that Boies’ work for Weinstein was unethical, partly because the Times’ was a Boies Schiller client.
 
Two days earlier, on Nov. 7, following publication of The New Yorker article, Boies had issued a statement addressed to his firm, stating that Weinstein was no longer a client and stressing that he “would never knowingly participate in an effort to intimidate or silence women or anyone else.”
 
In a Nov. 21 brief in the Epstein litigation, defense lawyer Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP argued that Ransome had never satisfied requirements to file anonymously and had publicly identified herself with her letter to the Times, so she should be required to add her name to the case caption.
 
Sigrid McCawley, a Boies Schiller partner in the firm’s Fort Lauderdale office who represents Ransome along with Boies and others, said her client ultimately chose to go public with her name “in the hopes that her courage will inspire other Epstein victims to speak their truth.”
 
In 2008, Epstein entered a guilty plea in Florida for soliciting an underage prostitute, which led to an 18-month jail term and placement on the national sex offender registry. Since then, multiple plaintiffs have filed related complaints against him, including one that includes allegations that President Donald Trump’s winter White House, Mar-a-Lago, was the location of events that led to sex trafficking.
 
Epstein has argued that the court should dismiss the case because Ransome failed to state a substantiated claim and because the claims she makes are barred by the statute of limitations.
 
Steptoe’s Miller had no immediate comment for this report.
 
  
 
  share on facebook  share on twitter 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Miriam Rozen
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
Miriam Rozen covers the business of law with a focus on law firm-client relationships. Contact her at mrozen@alm.com. Twitter: @MiriamRozen.
 
More from this author ›
  
 
 
  
 
Dig Deeper
   
• Global Law Firms
  
• Law Firm Management
  
• Law Firm Partners
  

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 

   
 
Trending Stories
       
•    
 
 
NY Lawmakers Ask Congress to Pass Marijuana Law Following Sessions Pot Reversal
 
New York Law Journal
 
  
 

      
•    
 
 
Greenberg Traurig, the G.O.A.T. of Law Firms?
 
The American Lawyer
 
  
 

      
•    
 
 
Milberg Joins Forces With Mass Torts, Personal Injury Firm
 
The American Lawyer
 
  
 

      
•    
 
 
Lawyers, Top Brass Among Cuts as Krasner Trims More Than 30 Jobs From DA's Office
 
The Legal Intelligencer
 
  
 

      
•    
 
 
Regional Wisconsin Firm Snaps Up 2 Smaller Shops
 
The American Lawyer
 
  
 

  
 
 
 
  
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Recommended Stories
 
 

 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
New York Law Journal
 
Shearman Bolsters Funds, Advisory Group With MoFo Hire
 
 Meghan Tribe  | January 08, 2018 
 
Jay Baris, chair of the investment management group at Morrison & Foerster, has joined Shearman & Sterling in New York, where he will reunite with his former mentor and ex-SEC chief of staff Andrew ""Buddy"" Donohue.
 
 
  
  
    
 
 
Featured Firms
 
  

Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone


2 Oliver St #608
Boston, MA 02109

857-444-6468

www.marksalomone.com

   

Gary Martin Hays & Associates P.C.


235 Peachtree St NE #400
Atlanta, GA 30303

800-898-4297

www.garymartinhays.com

   

The Law Firm Of Jonathan C. Reiter


350 5th Ave
New York, NY 10118

212-736-0979

www.jcreiterlaw.com

  
 
Presented by BigVoodoo 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
Resources
  
•  
 
  
  
 
A Case Study of Patent Abuse: Printing Industry vs Patent Trolls
 
From The TASA Group, Inc.
 
Facing patent infringement allegations? Discover how the printing industry is fighting back against patent trolls that threaten their bottom line and explore possible solutions for your case.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
GRC for GDPR: More Personal Data Visibility with Less Effort
 
From RSA
 
With GDPR implementation and compliance looming on the horizon (May 2018), the time to protect your data is now. Do not wait until it’s too late.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
GDPR Insight: Determining if Contracts are GDPR Compliant and Incident Ready
 
From Seal Software
 
The looming enforcement of the GDPR continues to grow closer. Are you sure your contracts are ready and will avoid fines?
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Leadership in Crisis: Tapping the Collective Strength of the CEO and Board
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
Corporate crises require well-orchestrated teamwork. Learn about the key elements needed in your crisis management plan and how board portals can help you establish crucial communications.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
TAR for Smart People
 
From Catalyst
 
How Technology Assisted Review (TAR) works and why it matters for legal professionals.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
The Price of Convenience: How to Improve Cybersecurity around Board Communications
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
This report provides recommendations for directors to improve cybersecurity practices around board communications to strike the right balance between convenience and security.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Contract Discovery & Analytics in a Nutshell
 
From Seal Software
 
Contract data doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Take advantage of this simple explanation of contract discovery and analytics.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
How the Cloud Can Keep Law Firm Data Safer
 
From AbacusNext
 
Cloud computing is flourishing, but law firms have been hesitant to adopt the tech shift. Learn how advances in cloud computing keeps your firm data safe while offering benefits and cost-savings.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
5 Best Practices for Information Security Governance
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
How does a company most effectively deploy its resources to protect highly sensitive data and information? Here’s five best practices for information security governance for decision makers.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
The Five Data Points Every In-House Employment Lawyer Needs to Know
 
From Littler CaseSmart
 
The role of big data in legal decision-making only continues to grow and those who embrace the opportunities data analytics creates will be best positioned for success.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
How to Manage the Modern Global Law Department
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Is your law department ready to go global? This article provides evaluations and solutions for management to effectively prepare their team to handle the challenges of a global law department.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Debunking Seven Myths About Arbitration and IP Cases
 
From American Arbitration Association
 
Intellectual property disputes are growing in complexity and costs, and businesses are seeking efficient alternatives to litigation. Seven myths about IP arbitration are debunked herein.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
GDPR: What It Means To Your Cybersecurity Strategy
 
From RSA
 
You must take steps now to protect against cyberattacks or risk losing millions in fines once the European Union adopts a new law.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Managing Litigation: E-Discovery Resources Survey Report
 
From Catalyst
 
Learn from the experience of your peers. Find out how legal operations professionals use technology to better manage litigation and internal investigations.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
AI Adoption and Ethical Considerations for In-House Counsel
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
As legal departments start to embrace AI adoption, both opportunities and concerns arise. Learn about possible ethical dilemmas AI raises, potential costs of adoption and 5 things you should do next.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
 
From AbacusNext
 
Learn what happens in ransomware attacks, why your firm is a prime target and preventative solutions to protect your clients and your business from such an occurrence.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Board Portal Buyer's Guide: 5 Essential Qualities
 
From Diligent Corporation
 
Not all board portal applications are created equal. This guide provides essential questions across five categories to help you evaluate and choose the best board portal software for your company.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Using Data Analytics to Increase Profitability
 
From LawyerMetrix
 
Discover how your firm can use data analytics to develop a rigorous growth strategy.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Tips for Drafting Effective Indemnification Clauses
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Although commonly used, indemnification provisions can be complex. Download this sample clause from Practical Law infused with tips to ensure your indemnification clause effectively manages risk.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
What Can AI Do For Your Legal Department?
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
The legal industry is on the cusp of a revolution led by the adoption of AI computers. Learn to boost productivity through many of these practical use cases for AI in your legal department.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Letters of Credit in Commercial Real Estate: A Primer
 
From Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
 
Letters of Credit are becoming more common as foreign investing increases in the U.S. commercial real estate market. Learn tips and guidelines to effectively use a Letter of Credit.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Being Sued for Patent Infringement? Four Issues to Address Early On
 
From Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
 
Have you been sued for patent infringement? Learn about early strategic options and take the first step towards a rigorous defense.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Tips to Navigate New Workplace Protections for Individuals
 
From Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
 
Protections continue to grow for individuals in the workplace in 2017. Learn what these new employment and labor protections mean for your company as well as tips for employers.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Cybersecurity 101: How Law Firms Can Prevent and Respond to Ransomware Attacks
 
From AbacusNext
 
Get up to speed on ransomware attacks, its implications to your firm, how to respond if one occurs and the best cybersecurity steps to protect and prevent one from occurring in the first place.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Customize Your Contract Management Process
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Download this template to track a company's contracts at their various stages, including executed or terminated contracts. The at-a-glance layout allows for quick organization and reference.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
The Future of Artificial Intelligence
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Examine the current state of artificial intelligence and explore the future AI roadmap in this second installment of the exclusive AI series by Thomson Reuters.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Sexual Harassment Prevention Training for Employees
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Be proactive and avoid sexual harassment in the workplace by downloading this sample harassment policy and training presentation to properly prepare your employees.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
U.S. Immigration Solution: Canada is Open for Business
 
From Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
 
In an effort to increase innovation and profits in a burgeoning global economy, companies need to attract and retain a highly skilled immigrant workforce. Could Canada be the solution?
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
U.S. Immigration Solution: Canada is Open for Business
 
From Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
 
In an effort to increase innovation and profits in a burgeoning global economy, companies need to attract and retain a highly skilled immigrant workforce. Could Canada be the solution?
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
5 Secrets to Extracting ROI from Experts
 
From The TASA Group, Inc.
 
Expert witnesses can be crucially valuable to your case or they can do more harm than good. Learn 5 secrets to extracting the best return on investment from experts.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Artificial Intelligence and Legal Technology: To Boldly Go Where No Legal Department Has Gone Before!
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
The legal industry has only begun to realize the potential and impact of AI on day-to-day practice. How will this technology impact the profession?
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Vacation Pay Stay State Laws
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Practical Law Chart: A complete 50-state survey compilation of vacation pay policies
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Elements of Confidentiality Agreements - Definitions of Confidential Information
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Only the smartest companies can both protect that information and leverage it for business opportunities. Do you have updated, current drafts of these important documents?
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Employee Termination Best Practices
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
This resource addresses key issues for employers to consider when terminating an employee and best practices to minimize claims of wrongful discharge.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Fiduciary Duties Overview
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Protect your company and its shareholders by educating directors with an overview of their fiduciary duties and the potential consequences, both personal and for the business.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Complimentary Attorney Client Privilege Checklist
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Keep your communications privileged, and ensure that employees understand their role.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Avoid Social Media Risks in 2017
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
The use of social media by individuals in and outside of the workplace is widespread and continues to grow. Create a Social Media policy that protects your company.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Executive Brief: Knowledge, know-how, and the ability to respond with confidence
 
From Thomson Reuters
 
Knowledge, know-how, and the ability to respond with confidence. Learn the keys to position yourself as a trusted corporate advisor.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
 
•  
 
  
  
 
Common Arbitration Misconceptions
 
From American Arbitration Association
 
This white paper discusses what not to believe about arbitration.
 
Download Now ›
 
  

 
  
  
  
  
 
 
ALM Legal Publication Newsletters
 
 
Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.
 
As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.
 
 
 Subscribe Now 
Privacy Policy
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
   Follow Us       
 

 
 Privacy Policy / Terms of Service 
 
 
 
Publications
  
• The American Lawyer
 
• Corporate Counsel
 
• National Law Journal
 
• New York Law Journal
 
• New Jersey Law Journal
 
• The Recorder
 
• More Publications ›
  
 
 
Law Topics
  
• Litigation
 
• Transactional Law
 
• Law Firm Management
 
• Legal Practice Management
 
• Cybersecurity
 
• Intellectual Property
 
• More Law Topics ›
  
 
 
Rankings
  
• AmLaw 100
 
• AmLaw 200
 
• Global 100
 
• National Law Journal 500
 
• Pro Bono Scorecard
 
• The A-List
 
• More Rankings ›
  
 
 
More
  
• Events
 
• ALM Intelligence
 
• Editorial Calendar
 
• Resources
 
• Legal Dictionary
 
• Jobs
 
• Law Firms
 
• Law Schools
  
 
 
Law.com
  
• About Us
 
• Contact Us
 
• Site Map
 
• Advertise With Us
 
• Customer Support
 
• Terms of Service
 
• FAQ
 
• Privacy Policy
 

  
 

 
  
  
  
 
Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
 
  

 

 

                  






https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2018/01/Salazar-luis-Article-201801081447.jpg






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj02/images/w_thaj02c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan03/images/w_rsan03c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal03/images/w_seal03c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili04/images/w_dili04c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb04/images/w_catb04c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili03/images/w_dili03c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal02/images/w_seal02c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa05/images/w_abaa05c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili02/images/w_dili02c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_litt01/images/w_litt01c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc66/images/w_thoc66c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee05/images/w_amee05c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan02/images/w_rsan02c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb02/images/w_catb02c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc65/images/w_thoc65c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa03/images/w_abaa03c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili01/images/w_dili01c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_lawy01/images/w_lawy01c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc62/images/w_thoc62c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc61/images/w_thoc61c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill03/images/w_sill03c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill02/images/w_sill02c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill01/images/w_sill01c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa01/images/w_abaa01c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc58/images/w_thoc58c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc49/images/w_thoc49c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc47/images/w_thoc47c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak02/images/w_blak02c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak01/images/w_blak01c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj01/images/w_thaj01c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc41/images/w_thoc41c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc39/images/w_thoc39c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc26/images/w_thoc26c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc24/images/w_thoc24c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc22/images/w_thoc22c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc21/images/w_thoc21c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc18/images/w_thoc18c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc28/images/w_thoc28c.gif






https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee01/images/w_amee01c.gif






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/temp-logo-blue-notag.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-fb-grey.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-tw-grey.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-go-grey.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-li-grey.png






https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-rs-grey.png






https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:300,400,700

@font-face {
	font-family: Open Sans;
	src: local(""Open Sans Light""), local(""OpenSans-Light""), url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/opensans/v15/DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff) format(""woff"");
	font-weight: 300;
	font-style: normal;
}
@font-face {
	font-family: Open Sans;
	src: local(""Open Sans Regular""), local(""OpenSans-Regular""), url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/opensans/v15/cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff) format(""woff"");
	font-weight: 400;
	font-style: normal;
}
@font-face {
	font-family: Open Sans;
	src: local(""Open Sans Bold""), local(""OpenSans-Bold""), url(https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/opensans/v15/k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff) format(""woff"");
	font-weight: 700;
	font-style: normal;
}






https://www.almcms.com/contrib/content/falcon-ui/falcon-ui.php

console.log(""no access"");


Sender: 	""Saved by Internet Explorer 11""	
Images: 	https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-mini-burger-blue.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-search-blue.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/close-btn.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/arrow-open.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-fb.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-tw.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-go.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-li.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-rs.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/logo-alm.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/brand-logos/temp-logo-blue-notag.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in-blue.png; https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/405/2018/01/boies-david-Article-201801082208.jpg; https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/396/2018/01/Alipay-Article-201801051622.jpg; https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2018/01/Salazar-luis-Article-201801081447.jpg; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj02/images/w_thaj02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan03/images/w_rsan03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal03/images/w_seal03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili04/images/w_dili04c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb04/images/w_catb04c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili03/images/w_dili03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal02/images/w_seal02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa05/images/w_abaa05c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili02/images/w_dili02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_litt01/images/w_litt01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc66/images/w_thoc66c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee05/images/w_amee05c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan02/images/w_rsan02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb02/images/w_catb02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc65/images/w_thoc65c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa03/images/w_abaa03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili01/images/w_dili01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_lawy01/images/w_lawy01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc62/images/w_thoc62c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc61/images/w_thoc61c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill03/images/w_sill03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill02/images/w_sill02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill01/images/w_sill01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa01/images/w_abaa01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc58/images/w_thoc58c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc49/images/w_thoc49c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc47/images/w_thoc47c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak02/images/w_blak02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak01/images/w_blak01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj01/images/w_thaj01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc41/images/w_thoc41c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc39/images/w_thoc39c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc26/images/w_thoc26c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc24/images/w_thoc24c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc22/images/w_thoc22c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc21/images/w_thoc21c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc18/images/w_thoc18c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc28/images/w_thoc28c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee01/images/w_amee01c.gif; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/temp-logo-blue-notag.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-fb-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-tw-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-go-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-li-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-rs-grey.png	
Attachments: 	https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-mini-burger-blue.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-search-blue.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/close-btn.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/arrow-open.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-fb.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-tw.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-go.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-li.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-rs.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/logo-alm.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/brand-logos/temp-logo-blue-notag.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/nav-icon-sign-in-blue.png; https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/405/2018/01/boies-david-Article-201801082208.jpg; https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/bb5f7888c30556fe3e54a7733c7b86fc?s=136&d=mm&r=g; https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/396/2018/01/Alipay-Article-201801051622.jpg; https://www.law.com/sites/americanlawyer/2018/01/08/client-who-stood-up-for-boies-goes-public-in-sex-trafficking-case/; https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2018/01/Salazar-luis-Article-201801081447.jpg; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj02/images/w_thaj02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan03/images/w_rsan03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal03/images/w_seal03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili04/images/w_dili04c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb04/images/w_catb04c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili03/images/w_dili03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_seal02/images/w_seal02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa05/images/w_abaa05c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili02/images/w_dili02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_litt01/images/w_litt01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc66/images/w_thoc66c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee05/images/w_amee05c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_rsan02/images/w_rsan02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_catb02/images/w_catb02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc65/images/w_thoc65c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa03/images/w_abaa03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_dili01/images/w_dili01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_lawy01/images/w_lawy01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc62/images/w_thoc62c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc61/images/w_thoc61c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill03/images/w_sill03c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill02/images/w_sill02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_sill01/images/w_sill01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_abaa01/images/w_abaa01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc58/images/w_thoc58c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc49/images/w_thoc49c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc47/images/w_thoc47c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak02/images/w_blak02c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_blak01/images/w_blak01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thaj01/images/w_thaj01c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc41/images/w_thoc41c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc39/images/w_thoc39c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc26/images/w_thoc26c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc24/images/w_thoc24c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc22/images/w_thoc22c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc21/images/w_thoc21c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc18/images/w_thoc18c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_thoc28/images/w_thoc28c.gif; https://img.tradepub.com/free/w_amee01/images/w_amee01c.gif; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/temp-logo-blue-notag.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-fb-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-tw-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-go-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-li-grey.png; https://www.law.com/assets/master-template/images/social-topic-rs-grey.png; https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:300,400,700; https://www.almcms.com/contrib/content/falcon-ui/falcon-ui.php	
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020857.txt,"A Word of Warning About Comparing

Corporate & Government Accounting...

e Government accounting standards do not report the present value of future
entitlement payments (such as Social Security or Medicare) as liabilities.
Instead, entitlement payments are recognized only when they are paid.

Our analysis takes a different view: governments create liabilities when they
enact entitlements and do not provide for revenues adequate to fund them.

e We measure the entitlement liability as the present value of estimated
entitlement payments in excess of expected revenues for citizens of working age
based on Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds’ actuarial analysis.

e Government accounting standards also do not recognize the value of internally-
generated intangible assets (such as the sovereign power to tax). We do not
recognize those assets either, as we have no basis to measure them. But the
US government has substantial intangible assets that should provide future
economic benefits.

Note: For more discussion on alternatives to corporate and official government accounting methods, see Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Alan J. Auerbach, and Jagadeesh
okhale, “Generational Accounting: A Meaningful Way to Assess Generational Policy,” published on 12/94 in The Journal of Economic Perspectives.

KP Source: Greg Jonas, Morgan Stanley Research.
i USA Inc. | High Level Thoughts 31

...and About Government Budgeting

e Federal government budgeting follows arcane practices that are very different
from corporate budgeting — and can neglect solutions to structural problems in
favor of short-term expediency.

e Federal government does not distinguish capital budget (for long-term
investment) from operating budget (for day-to-day operations). As a result, when
funding is limited, government may choose to reduce investments for the future
to preserve resources for day-to-day operations.

e Budget “scoring” rules give Congress incentives to hide the true costs...and help
Congressional committees defend their turf.”

Note: *For more detail, refer to slide 116 on congressional budget scoring rules related to recent Healthcare reform.
a USA Inc. | High Level Thoughts 32

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020857
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024783.txt,"Or
>
A
“Bw
Plan
fon on

az

THERAPEUTICS

Evolve
Therapeutics

San Francisco, California
www.evolvetherapeutics.com

Evolve Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical
company focused on the research and manu-
facture of cannabinoid-based medications. The
company produces a variety of cannabis prod-
ucts that are available in dispensaries located
throughout California.

1 FLOW KANA

Flow Kana

San Francisco, California
www.flowkana.com

Flow Kana is a producer of cannabis flower. The
company owns property in Mendocino County,
where it plans to partner with small cultivators
to create an institute for cannabis manufactur-
ing, education and leisure.

© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

CHAPTER VIII Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies 2018

EVOXE

LABORATORIE Sm

Evoxe
Laboratories

Oakland, California
www.evoxelabs.com

Evoxe Laboratories is a producer of cannabis
vaporizers. The company develops pre-filled
cannabis vaporizers that are designed to provide
consumers with a specific mood. The company’s
products are available in dispensaries through-
out California.

We flowhub

Flowhub

Denver, Colorado
www.flowhub.co

Flowhub is a provider of inventory management
software for the cannabis industry. The com-
pany provides software to aid cultivators and
dispensary operators in tracking their business
from seed to sale. The software is designed to aid
customers in compliance.

147

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024783
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021591.txt,"09/30/08 18:59:02

Page 1

RREKKERKEKER CHILD LOCATE KRRRKKEKERREREE

09/30/2008

Does Accomplishment Involve

Sub. Invest. Asst by Other FOs:

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

FINAN ANALYST
AIRCRAFT ASST

LAB FIELD SUP
PEN REGISTERS

UCO - NAT BACK
NCAVC/VI-CAP

Assisting Agents SOC

VICT-WITN COOR
IO WANTED FLYR

COMPUTER ASST PHOTO COVERGE CRIM/NS INTEL SARS

CONSEN MONITR POLYGRAPH CRIS NEG-FED CART
ELSUR/FISC SRCH WAR EXEC CRIS NEG-LOC ASSET FORF PRO
ELSUR/ITI SHOW MONEY ERT ASST FORF SUPPORT P
ENG FIELD SUP SOG ASST BUTTE-ITC TFOS/CTD

ENG TAPE EXAM SWAT TEAM SAVANNAH = ITC CXS/CTD

LEGATS ASST. TECH AG/EQUIP POC-WRCSC INFRAGARD/CYD
EVIDNCE PURCH TEL TOLL RECS FT. MON-NRCSC OFC/CID
INFORMANT/CW UCO-GROUP I FOR LANG ASST PPP

LAB DIV EXAMS

UCO-GROUP II

NON FBI LAB EX

FN DN >

Case Number: 31E-MM- 108062 Stat Agent Name: Report Date: 09/30/2008 b6
Serial No.: Stat Agent SOC.: Accom Date.: 06/30/2008 b7¢c
bT7E

Subject Name

ont ste es tee. : C4 C7
A Fugitive. .......2.2. : N

Bankruptcy Fraud ee ee ew EN

Computer Fraud/Abuse. ....:N RA Squad Task Force
Corruption of Public Officials: N Tort seers wee een ence
Money Laundering. ...... : N PBC PB2 SSPBC

Used, but did not help
Helped, Minimally
Helped, Substantially
Absolutely Essential

Living/Deceased: Living
Date Child Located: 06/30/2008

ENTERED UPON RECEIPT

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021591
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023917.txt,"CHAPTER 12

MZ

PE G@:

How Not to Teach

Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because
they understand everything too soon.
—Alexander Pope

My daughter learned a lot from me and from her surroundings when
she was small. All children learn all the time when they are little.
But what are they learning? When Hana was about 1-1/2 we lived in
Switzerland. Hana was my parent’s first grandchild. Since they were in
New York, there were frequent phone calls back and forth and more
than the occasional visit. Once during this period I got curious as
to whether Hana knew the names of her grandparents. I figured she
might not know the word name so I asked her, “What does Gammy
(her name for my mother) call Poppy (my father). She immediately
responded, “Maaacc!!” imitating the intonation and exasperation of
my mother trying to get my father’s attention. I asked what my father
called my mother, and she said “Marge!” in the tone of an authorita-
tive military call.

Hana talked to her grandparents on the phone quite a bit. One day
I noticed her walking in furious circles while she was talking, at one
point almost bringing the phone down on her head. Now who had
been teaching her that? Well... me. That’s what I do when I talk on
the phone. And it is still what my daughter does, 30 years later.

Speaking of 30 years later (well, 20 in this story), I observed this
same seemingly imitative behavior in Hana when she was in college.
I remarked to a friend of my daughter who went to school with her in
Evanston that there was a no left turn sign in Evanston (where I also
worked) that I always ignored because it was so stupid. She said that
my daughter always ignored the same sign and also said it was stupid.
The curious part of this story is that my daughter and I, having our
own cars and lives, had never been in a car together in Evanston and
neither had we ever discussed this sign.

177

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023917
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032012.txt,"From: Mitchell Bard
on behalf of Mitchell Bard

Sent: 7/4/2019 12:46:27 PM
To: jeevacation@gmail.com
Subject: Reminder: AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?

Eel

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032012
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022098.txt,"TERSON

omen, but Nadia is tall. She’s
ith glowing skin, a wide smile,

iss for a Bond girl—a woman

| intrigue. But of course, that’s

CHAPTER, 33

's and the women in Epstein's
profile of him, New York maga-
; (“He is amazing”), Princeton
), MIT professors (“If I had acted
has given me over the years, Id
am right now”), and other lumi-

Virginia Roberts: 1999

Clinton.

n years,” says Donald Trump.
be with.”

sday Trump would run for presi-
: Hillary Clinton for Bill Clinton's
n.) But Trump’s already ahead of
severing his ties to Epstein well
et wind of Epstein'’s penchant for

rump’s estate, Mar-a-Lago, had once belonged to the fab-
ulously wealthy heiress Marjorie Merriweather Post. It
sits on twenty perfectly manicured acres less than two
miles away from Jeffrey Epstein’s home on El Brillo Way. It’s
home to the exclusive Mar-a-Lago Club, which has a spa, tennis
courts, and a very posh restaurant.
Donald Trump had fought the town council for decades as
| they blocked all his efforts to turn the place into a private resort.

ids out that in their endless hunt 4 | Other clubs on the island—those with a history of excludin
g

urers have been prowling around” | blacks and Jews—had never faced such restrictions, Trump had

4 argued. At one point he sent copies of two movies to every mem-
a of the town council: Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, in which
pidney Poitier confronts his girlfriend’s racist parents, and Gen-
tleman’s Agreement, in whicha journalist confronts anti-Semitism

H Connecticut and New York City.

i
a

iy)
“s
1

= 131

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022098
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028482.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
8/4/2015 10:23:22 PM 
Allen West 
Rafael Bardaji 
Herb goodman [ 
; janet kafka 
ACT for America 
taal safdie 
Neil anderson I I; nate white 
Henry hortenstine ]; Gary Gross 
house ; Bennett Schmidt 
• Marcie brown [ 
; jeff epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]; Michael Stechel 
• Michael horowitz 
buchholtz 
Subject: Fw: The Iran Nuclear Deal 
Philip Kafka 
; Grant Seeger 
; James Ramsey 
; john zouzelka-cell 
ate mcclain 
• uri fouzailov 
rita hortenstine 
Forrest Miller - adj kearsarge 
Val sherman 
; Mark epstein 
Marshall Funk 
; michael 
Pis spent 2 minutes and watch this dennis prager video on iran deal. And then forward it if you agree. If not, I 
understand and just delete. Respectfully, terry 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
From: Mike Cohen < 
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:00:42 +0000 
To: Terry Kafka 
Subject: FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal 
From: Mike Cohen 
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 7:16 PM 
Subject: FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal 
Dear Friends, 
PLEASE watch this very important short and incredibly clear video regarding the Iran deal. 
If you have not yet called your congressmen and asked other friends and relatives to do so, PLEASE do that as well. The 
wellbeing of your children and grandchildren depend upon it! 
Mike 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028482 
- 
The Iran Nuclear Deal 
Dear Friend, 
This week, our featured video is as urgent as it gets. Just days after President Obama and 
Secretary of State John Kerry announced the nuclear deal with Iran, Dennis Prager was in 
studio recording a video explaining why the deal is so dangerous, and how it parallels what 
happened in 1938 between Great Britain and Nazi Germany. This is the fastest turn-
around time on any video we've released in PragerU's history, but what's at stake is so 
monumentally important, we knew we couldn't waste any time. So please take five minutes 
to watch the video. Forward it to your family, friends, and the offices of your Congressional 
representatives. We all have an obligation to do whatever is in our power to impact as 
many people on this topic as we can. 
Click image above or here to watch this video 
- 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028483 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028484 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026194.txt,"very well .. safe travel
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night .

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM, <> wrote:
enjoy’

Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

in florida ,

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM, [> wrote:
hey shiek .. 1 will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. 1 can drop by to say hello saturday night .. if

you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

only you please

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM, <> wrote:
thnx jeff ..im prayingpiabid

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

the book worked. :)

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM, <> wrote:
only for you .. trump is on the phone today .. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one
table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond
please note

The information contained in this communication is

confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may

constitute inside information, and is intended only for

the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026194
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011654.txt,"commando unit of a couple of dozen men. Its sole task was to seek out and kill
the enemy force’s leader. The key to their success was mind-training. Over a
period of months, sometimes years, the commandos’ se/f-perception was
altered. They were taught to believe that they had already died. Since their lives
on earth were done, all that remained was a formal passage through the turnstile
into eternal happiness, and to go out in glory. My visitor not only suggested that
Israel establish exactly this kind of death-cum-suicide unit. He volunteered to
train the men himself, and lead the first mission. With as straight a face as I
could muster, I thanked him for taking the time to see me. But I told him his
idea was probably not for us. Little did I know that a whole new kind of enemy,
epitomized by Al-Qaeda and the self-styled Islamic State, would build a
terrorist death cult around it.

Nava and I, with three-year-old Yael, and Michal just turning seven, left for
California in the late summer of 1977. The two years that followed were
uplifting and reinvigorating — not just because of Stanford, but a further, utterly
unexpected transformation back home soon after we’d left.

It, too had its roots in the 1973 war, but on the Arab side. Before the war,
Egypt’s Anwar Sadat had extended feelers about the possibility of peace
negotiations, only to see them ignored. Israel won the war in the end. But the
Egyptians’ surprise attack across the canal — and the panic and huge Israeli
losses in the early days of the war — had shattered our aura of invincibility.
Politically, Sadat had gone a long way to erasing the humiliation of 1967. That
freed him to do something which — after decades of Arab-Israeli conflict — was
astonishing. He travelled to Jerusalem, the capital of a country which neither
Egypt nor any other Arab country even recognized. He met Begin, and he
addressed the Knesset with a call for peace.

It is impossible to convey to Israelis who did not live through the birth of the
state, and our tumultuous early decades, the power of the emotions stirred by
Sadat’s visit. It was on November 19, 1977. With my arm around Nava, I
watched the live American television coverage as Sadat’s plane touched down
at Ben-Gurion airport. Begin was at the center of the throng of dignitaries on
hand to greet him: a who’s who of political and military leaders not just from
his administration, but who had led Israel in 1967 and 1973. Golda was there.

183
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011654
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020437.txt,"From: Richard Kahn | Ts |

Sent: 4/27/2018 8:25:30 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Will Cohen Cooperate? Tenuous Finances May Provide Crucial Clues

Importance: — High

shockingly it appears he has some money in real estate deals...

will cohen Cooperate? Tenuous Finances May Provide Crucial Clues
2018-04-27 08:00:00.2 GMT

By Shahien Nasiripour and Caleb Melby
(Bloomberg) -- In the two weeks since federal agents seized

the files of Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s personal

attorney and fixer, a question has hovered: will Cohen cooperate
with investigators?

His decision could depend in part on whether he can readily
shoulder the enormous legal fees required to fight a federal
probe of this magnitude.

At first blush, Cohen looks like a pretty rich man. He
drives a white Rolls Royce, sports a $50,000 watch and owns a
fair amount of Manhattan real estate.

But just as his loyalty to Trump is coming under scrutiny,

a more tenuous financial picture is emerging. A taxi business he
and his wife built is deeply in debt and losing money daily, his
commercial real estate is throwing off only modest income, and
his legal and consulting work is on hold while he remains under
investigation.

cohen declined repeated requests to comment.

The owners of 32 New York City taxi licenses -- known as
medallions -- he and his wife, Laura, took out at least 16 loans
based on their once-soaring value, liens show. with the rise of
Uber and Lyft, the price of a medallion has fallen from more
than $1 million to around $163,000 in the past four years.
Income from the taxi business has plummeted, and millions of

dollars of the Cohens’ loans went under water. Their bank said

in a November public filing that it had loans out to three taxi
borrowers, and all were at high risk of default.

Suspended Medallions

Unpaid taxes and fines have piled up at the Cohen taxi
companies, triggering a suspension of about half of the
medallions, city records show, squeezing cash flow.

whatever monthly income the cabs once produced almost
certainly fell well short of the debt payments owed to Sterling
National Bank, their Montebello, New York-based lender. Sterling
has foreclosed on operators in similar situations and sued them
but appears to be taking a less-confrontational approach with
the Cohens. On Tuesday, the bank agreed to new loans for their
companies and to Cohen personally, public filings show. Sterling
declined to comment.

The taxi business isn’t the only part of Cohen's empire
that’s suffering. The law firm Squire Patton Boggs said it ended

its ""strategic alliance” with Cohen after law enforcement raided
his offices, and the rest of his legal work could decline for

the same reason. Cohen, 51, makes others’ ugly problems

disappear, a practice that was previously lucrative. Essential
Consultants LLC, a company affiliated with Cohen, was paid
$250,000 after he negotiated a $1.6 million payment to a former
Playboy model on behalf of Republican National Committee
official Elliott Broidy, according to a Wall Street Journal
report.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020437
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032006.txt,"When Gekko delivers his speech, ""Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right. Greed works,”
cinematic history was made.

“Wall Street” was set in 1985, a time before ten financial news networks broadcasting 24/7 existed. The entire
financial services industry was largely unknown and Oliver Stone nailed it.

Four years ago, Wall Street’s producer Ed Pressman decided it was time for a sequel and met with Fox Film
Entertainment co-chairmen Tom Rothman and Jim Gianopulos. Michael Douglas was immediately on-board
pending script approval. Steven Schiff wrote the first script before the global economic crash of 2008 rendered
it obsolete.

Alan Loeb was brought in for a rewrite. Pressman asked me to meet Loeb at the Carlyle Hotel to explain the
social rhythms of New York’s financial high society. Whereas Gekko’s character was modeled after ‘70s junk
bond kings (Michael Milken) and ‘80s mergers and acquisitions killers (Henry Kravis), Loeb bases the new
villain on hedge fund billionaires like John Paulson and Mike Novogratz, geniuses who have created
stratospheric wealth beyond Gordon Gekko’s wildest dreams. When Oliver Stone agreed to direct, he rewrote a
portion of the script to focus on bankers as well as hedge funders, taking no screen credit.

This past September, Oliver yelled, ""action"" as Gordon Gekko, with long grey hair, comes back to life as he
emerges from a lengthy prison stint shot outside of Sing Sing in Ossining, New York. Gekko is desperate to
redefine himself in a different era. The New York Post runs a full-page photo of Gekko and New Yorkers
immediately become obsessed with the filming of Wall Street 2.

A week into shooting, a glorious fall day. Ed Pressman invites me on the set at the Central Park Zoo. Oliver
designs an elaborate tracking shot around the seal pool where Gekko, fresh from jail, walks and talks to Jake
Moore, a young idealistic investment banker played by Shia LaBoeuf. They discuss Gekko’s daughter Winnie,
Moore’s fiancée, played by Carrie Mulligan, who is also having an off-screen romance with LaBoeuf. Oliver
played Cupid. Moore invites Gekko to the Alzheimer's Ball at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Gekko, who
used to be a sponsor or honoree of such events, cannot even afford a ticket.

The shot starts with a barking seal jumping for fish, then pans down to the actors. Extras weave in and out. In
one take Michael makes a wrong turn and ends up at the monkey house. Everyone laughs. The atmosphere on
the set is courteous but quick and tense. There is pressure when you are making a sequel to a hit.

I watch the action on monitors while sitting on the producers' canvas chairs with Pressman, Eric Kopeloff
(""Monsters Ball"") and Celia Costas, who was a location manager on the first ""Wall Street.” They have asked
me to be an extra in the Alzheimer's Ball scene and bring some friends to play rich Upper East Side socialites.
Oliver wants over the top glam, go-to-the-vault jewels and couture gowns. ""Give me the night before the
Titanic goes down,"" were his exact words. Not a problem.

I pay a quick visit to Michael in his trailer on Fifth Avenue where he is resting. We go way back. I was his
personal publicist when he won the Golden Globe and Oscar for Best Actor for ""Wall Street"" and we have
remained great friends. Gekko is just as challenging for him the second time because of endless pages of
technical financial dialogue. We discuss Catherine Zeta-Jones' Broadway debut in a ""Little Night Music.”
Michael has a stack of partially finished handwritten thank you notes next to him for gifts received for
their shared birthday party on September 25th at the St. Regis. Her 40th and his 65th.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032006
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032676.txt,"From: 
Sent: 12/22/2017 12:03:30 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
m ok.. still waiting for new york trip .. taking the family to dubai for new year 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 22, 2017, at 2:43 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
what have you been doing? any fun? 
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:53 AM___________________________wrote: 
i m trying to wear the sweater but it has been geeting a bit warm here° 
hope you doing well 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 9, 2017, at 1:13 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
They told me to discuss in Jan 
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:00 AM wrote: 
i forget to ask.. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you?? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
no come now !!! 
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM, wrote: 
i m at the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your house00 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Yes 
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM_________________________________'wrote: 
sorry that is 2512 for the gate Ii 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
lOpm should I bring special cake from New York 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032676 
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM__________________________wrote: 
very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and 
send me the day and time. 
thnx 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
You are welcome at my house always . And more private 
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Of courses 
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM 
??? 
wrote: 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
at the moment i was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like 
to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. , 
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM,___________________________wrote: 
can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 
9th 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Dec 5, 2017, at 3:34 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I am planning to be in paris starting the 9th for the week. any chance to see you 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032677 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032678 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032679 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032680 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011898.txt,"/ BARAK / 141

was important to convey to him honestly, face-to-face, where Israel stood on Iran.
Or at least where I stood.

With our joint exercises pushed back until the fall, the logical time for us to
attack was the summer of 2012, when the atmospheric and weather conditions
were optimal. Operationally, everything was ready. Politically, those ministers who
were against military action had not changed their minds. If anything, they seemed
more strongly opposed. Ironically, they now argued that because we’d waited so
long, the Iranians were too close to their “window of immunity.” Even some senior
members of the military and security establishment, though in agreement over the
technical aspects of the attack plan, retained political reservations. But as I'd told
President Obama, now that we had the operational support of the military and
intelligence professionals, the decision in effect rested with Bibi and me. The fact
we were ready to go ahead in those circumstances was not unprecedented. When
Menachem Begin ordered the bombing of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear reactor in
1981, he had acted against the advice of the then-heads of both the Mossad and
military intelligence, the chairman of our nuclear energy commission, and of
Shimon Peres, who was head of the Labor opposition.

But as we neared our final, formal decision, we were forced into another delay.
In the summer of 2012, an unrelated flare-up of tensions in the Gulf caused Iran
and several of its neighbors to place their forces on heightened alert. Though the
peak-alert phase passed quickly, Iran’s military was still not back on a fully normal
footing by the start of September, and when small American advance teams began
arriving for the joint exercises, Iran’s alert level went up again. Technically, we
could still have gone ahead with the attack. In all probability, it would still have
succeeded, setting back the Iranians’ program by at least a year and, depending on
how quickly they could rebuild and resupply clandestinely abroad, perhaps for
significantly longer.

But as more and more American soldiers and sailors arrived, I finally decided
against an Israeli strike — not because I doubted the damage it would do to Iran’s
nuclear efforts, but because of the damage it would surely do to our ties with the

427
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011898
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029709.txt,"So, although the Peres vision of peace is
a positive legacy, he has also taught us
less helpful lessons. The settlements are a
supremely negative inheritance, but I
would argue that the anti-democratic
rejection of the concept of a
parliamentary opposition is an even more
harmful bequest handed down to us by
President Shimon Peres.

Daniel Gavron, who lives in Israel, is a
former journalist and the author of nine
books, the most recent of which is Holy
Land Mosaic, stories of cooperation and
coexistence between Israelis and
Palestinians (Rowman & Littlefield,
2008).

Article 4.

NYT

India vs. China vs. Egypt

Thomas L. Friedman

February 5, 2013 -- New Delhi -- It’s
hard to escape a visit to India without
someone asking you to compare it to
China. This visit was no exception, but I
think it’s more revealing to widen the
aperture and compare India, China and
Egypt. India has a weak central
government but a really strong civil
society, bubbling with elections and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029709
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033568.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
paul krassner 
2/10/2019 12:09:30 AM 
; Tom 
Goldberg ; Kevin Bright 
Michael Simmons ; Lee Quarnstrom 
__________________________________; LARRY SLOMAN 
; W&K 
; Jay Levin 
Subject: Fwd: Daryl Cagle's Blog 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Daryl Cagle c> 
Subject: Daryl Cagle's Blog 
Date: February 9, 2019 at 3:03:36 PM PST 
To: paul krassner < > 
Reply-To: Daryl Cagle <.> 
• George Krassner 
; Daniel Dawson 
; Walli Leff 
; Danny 
; Lanny Swerdlow 
; HARRY SHEARER 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033568 
Howard Schult 
By Daryl Cagle on Feb 09, 2019 12:13 pm 
I forgot to post my cartoon from week before last, about Howard Schultz, the prospective independent presidential 
candidate, billionaire and Starbucks magnate. Schultz threatens to split the vote for a Democratic party candidate, 
possibly throwing the election to Donald Trump. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033569 
The two legged Starbucks mermaid logo is so disturbing that I love to 
draw it whenever I can. Here's the original Starbucks logo, that customers didn't like. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033570 
The logo was intended to depict the merger of two coffee companies, the original Starbucks and Howard Schultz's 
company, // Gomale that purchased Starbucks. Starbucks has a nautical theme to go with the character of Seattle. 
""Starbuck"" was the name of the first mate in the novel Moby Dick. 
This two legged, merger-mermaid is nasty, which makes it great fodder for cartoons. I drew the mermaid last year when 
there was a racism scandal at Starbucks, leading the company to shut down for a day to do racial sensitivity training. This 
logo-fish-girl would scare anybody! 
Read in browser »  
Jeff Bezos and David Pecker 
By Daryl Cagle on Feb 08, 2019 06:04 pm 
Here's my new cartoon on the world's richest man, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, and the National Enquirer's (AM I) CEO David 
Pecker, who was blackmailing Bezos. Pecker's AMI was extorting Bezos, demanding that the Washington Post (which 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033571 
Bezos owns) hold back publication on their investigation of AMI, and that Bezos stop a private investigator he hired to look 
into AMI — otherwise they would publish photos of Bezos' penis. Bezos was brave to expose Pecker's extortion. 
It is interesting that Pecker and AMI seems to have such success with blackmail that his attorneys didn't step back to think 
of what would happen if the person they were blackmailing simply made their emails public. 
AMI is looking pretty sleazy these days, with likely links to Saudi Arabia, and a reported safe full of Donald Trump secrets, 
among other tawdry stuff. So, I took advantage of Pecker's dickish name and pulled Pecker's pants down. Some cartoons 
are fun to draw — even if editors won't publish them much. 
Read in browser »  
Recent Articles: 
Chinese Hackers! Ouch!  
Randy and the National Lampoon  
Dik Browne: Hot Golfer  
The Best of Roger Stone  
Trump Knocked Out!  
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033572 
Share This Newsletter 
Share 
Tweet 
+1 
Share 
Forward 
Follow Me Online 
Facebook 
Page 
=X' 
@dcagle 
DarylCagle.com 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033573 
This email was sent to ______________ 
why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences 
Cagle Cartoons, Inc. • P.O. Box 22342 • Santa Barbara, CA 93121 • USA 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033574 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026180.txt,"From: ee

Sent: 9/22/2017 3:40:36 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

for now .. im leaving monday .. but all depends on my meeting with him. as far as i know, he will be there for
another week but i will know more sunday. 1 will make sure to keep you updated &

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM, [> wrote:

that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait ..
will write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. ifi1am here

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM, ~_ § wrote:

very well .. safe travel
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night .

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM, <i wrote:
enjoy’

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

in florida ,

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM, <> wrote:
hey shiek .. 1 will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night .. if you
bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026180
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030258.txt,"The Special Counsel's office, nearly leak-proof since its inception more
than a year ago, can appear to be operating in some parallel universe
unmoved by the every-day political turmoil. But in the course of
conversations I've had researching a new book on President Trump and
the forces arrayed against him, it has become clear that Robert Mueller
and his office are already preparing for a life or death confrontation
with the President and the mother of all constitutional crises.

Over the last several months the Mueller office has prepared a
possible indictment of the president on charges related to obstruction of
justice and devised a legal strategy to navigate the inevitable fallout
from such an indictment.

My discussions have been with both White House advisors and
people close to the investigation—that is, sources on both sides of the
possible conflict. No source involved in this story would speak on the
record. But in broad-strokes each side's understanding matches the
account provided to me by the other side.

Since at least April the Special Counsel has had in place a set of
allegations, proposed charges, and an aggressive legal theory to support
the indictment of the president on obstruction charges. In the last few
weeks, as the President has indulged his pardon authority, the Mueller
team has also developed a legal basis to oppose what the Special
Counsel believes will be a likely pardon of former National Security
Advisor, Michael Flynn—who had previously struck a plea bargain
which could include his testimony against the President—and what it
believes to be another step in the President's obstruction efforts.

At this point, the case for indictment has, in effect, a judge of one,
since the Mueller team must get the approval of Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein to proceed. As recently as April, Rosenstein
publicly declared that the President was not a target, but this may have
been a kind of fig leaf: technically the President does not become a
formal target until Rosenstein agrees to designate him as one. It may
also illustrate a conflict between the Deputy Attorney General and the
investigators he has overseen since the recusal of Attorney General Jeff
Sessions from the Russia-related investigation—though, according to
one source, Mueller believes he does have the support of his boss.

The proposed indictment would be all the more controversial
because it finds the entire narrative of the case for obstruction in plain
sight. Almost nothing in it-involves new information; rather, it takes
well-covered public events and moves them to a set of circumstantial

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030258
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011640.txt,"entire airport. Though I didn’t say so, I had my doubts it would work. It was a
bit like the initial option for the Rue Verdun raid Dado had rejected: a classic
ground assault which, in addition to eliminating any chance of surprise,
obviously ran the risk of igniting a small ground war. But I did think that some
combination of Peled’s idea and the surprise commando strike we’d been
looking at might provide an answer.

A few hours later, the hostages’ ordeal took a chilling turn, which soon also
provided us with our first real detailed picture of the scale of the challenge we
faced. In a haunting echo of the Nazis’ “selection” process in the Holocaust, the
terrorists separated all the passengers with Israeli passports or Jewish names.
They let the rest of them go, and allowed them to board a special Air France
flight back to Paris. We immediately dispatched Amiram Levin to debrief the
freed passengers. On a scrambled teleprinter line Wednesday night, Amiram
came up with far more than we could have hoped for. One of released
passengers was a French woman who had managed to hide the fact she was
Jewish. She confirmed reports we had been getting that the hostages were being
held in the airport’s former terminal building, about a mile from its newer
terminal and the main runways. Other passengers revealed that the hijackers had
placed explosives around the old terminal building. And that, despite my hope
that Idi Amin would stand aside if we did decide to go in and rescue the
hostages, his troops were helping to guard the area.

So in addition to taking on the hijackers, we’d have to find a way to deal
with Ugandan soldiers. In another round of discussions in my office through the
late hours of Wednesday night, we finally settled on our plan: Peled’s major
airborne operation, but with a Sayeret Matkal strike force, with its “Ugandan”
motorcade, spearheading it. Minutes later, three other C-130s would fly in
additional troops to secure the rest of the airport, deal with any Ugandan army
resistance, and fly out the Israeli soldiers and the hostages.

An operation on that scale naturally meant bringing in Dan Shomron. After
I’d taken the plan to Kuti Adam, he briefed Dan on the full detail and called me
down to see him again. Dan had left to start preparations for the operation. He’d
made just one request, Kuti said: that I be in command of the sayeret force.

169

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011640
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020423.txt,"Zid |

CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO
The Chinese Puzzle
1. “The first [false assumption] ...”—Snowden video in Hong Kong
2. “Giving China its first...”--2014 Annual Report to Congress by the U.S.-China Economic and

Security Review Commission, quoted in David Tweed, “China Takes Nuclear Weapons
Undersea Away From Prying Eyes, Bloomberg Business, December 8, 2014

3. “Results of decades of...”—Select Committee, U.S. Congress, Report, 1999.
http://www.house.gov/coxreport/chapfs/over.html

4. “A vast enterprise in China...”-- Nir Kshetri, The Rapidly Transforming Chinese High-
Technology Industry and Market (Chandos Publishing, London) 2008. p.92

5. “By 2007, Paul Strassmann...”-- Staff, “China has .75M zombie computers' in U.S.,”
UPI, September 17, 2007

6. “Cyber attack had harvested...”-- James Lewis, “Hackers May Have Obtained Names),
New York Times, June 11,2015

7. “Those records are a legitimate...”-- Gerald Baker, “Michael Hayden Says U.S. Is Easy
Prey for Hackers,” Wall Street Journal. June 21, 2015

8. ""Any attempt to monopolize...""-- Patrick Goodenough, “Chinese President in Veiled
Warning to the US: Don’t Try to ‘Monopolize Regional Affairs.” CNS News May 22,
2014

9. “This mandate includes monitoring...”—Author’s interview with a dormer U.S.

intelligence officer stationed in Hong Kong who requested anonymity.

10. “Regards Hong Kong as ...”—Author’s interview with Tyler Drumheller

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020423
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012349.txt,"aoe

he slip it offof you or did you just have it on and it was
just banging?

A Yealy, it was just hanging. He had snapped it off
and it was just right here,

Gt IS

oy

By Q Okay. At any time did he touch your breasts?

& A Yeah.

‘7 Q When -- okay. So vou're standing there, your bra

8 has been unsnapped. What kind of panties did you have on? ;
© Do you remember?

A Athone.
Q A thong?
La A Uh-hub.
Q He started touching you on the outside of your
panGes os did he move your panties to one side?

eae

peor boat

5 A On the outside first and then he moved, he maved
°@ them over.
au Q. Okay. And then he started touching you on the
12 outside of your vagina?
3 A Uh-huh.
29 Q And he told you he was not going to ge inside.
24 A Yeah.
Be Q Atwhat point did that change?
PP? A When he started feeling dewn there and then
24 when -- pretty soon.
an Q When you say Higers, did he use more than one

TL fuper?

Z A Cthink he used two but { don't know,
I Q Okay.
& A And then afler T told him, | backed away and |] was

S kind of like shaking my head no, he's like okay, I’m sorry.
6 And then he kind of still put bis fingers down there. He
was just like pushing really hard on me like, | don't knaw,.
he just, just tet ke his Gngers weren't in me bul it
was ciose enough lo where it stil felt weird.

( How cid you -- how did -- when be had his fingers
inside you, you backed up to ect them out or --

A Yeah. And to Jet him knew that [ don't want to do
thar.

Q Okay. And none of this was told to you by |
thar this would happen?

A No.

Q. Okay.

A That's why when [ got out ] was freaking out but ]

OW fe

pe fd

Wal NO

age

we ets
~l

toy:

1
i
2

happened and 7 told her wha? happened and she said oh. it’s
okay. He did that to one of my other frtends | brought

here. And | was like and you let him do that and still got
me in there’? And she's dike oh, it's okay. You got $200.
Does it matter? | said did you have te do that? She said
no. Twas fike all right, then you don't know how it feels.

Page 10)

ea) A Umni, then {inaudible.) No. | krow what it is.

3G Q Okay, Did you visually see his penis?

i? A Ub-hub. Yeab.
“48 Q Would you say it was circumcised or uncircumcised? |-
: 73 A [would think it would be circumcised but J tned

.23 didn’t want to see what was actually happening.
,

igh A tle came.

a.
gue A No He didn'task me foranything. Like [ think

didn't even say anvthing to her and then she asked me what : ‘ $

Lao Q Okay. How long would you say this session lasted?

Page 12 4.

wal

She's like let's just zo shopping and stuff and I was Itke

2 no.

2 Q Okay. During this time that this was occurring,

4 he was jerking off you said?

3 A Uh-huh.

ic (Q Okay. What does that mean to you? 1 mean like is
= it something that -- do you know whal masturbation is?

g A Yeah.

2 Q Is that what you consider --
iG A Yeah
as Q Okay. Did you -- I'm sorry.

Le A That's okay.

Q De you knew what a circumeised and uncircumcised

24° penis 1s?

not to look.
Q. Okay.
AN dowas kind of just like locking away because |

Q Okay, You said that he had Hnished.

Q Okay.
é A Because he was dike a bie sigh of relief like he
had been done and he just got right back wp and --
Q De you know where he came on? Was it or the
iowel? Was it on himself? On the bed er --
A Tibink it was on the towel lilce nght between his
ees probably.
3 Q Okay. As] told you before and | explained to
%  yorr mom, what he did was wrong, okay?
Sf A Ub-huh.
12 Q Cwant to reassure you an that, Okay?
Atany point did be ever ask you to leave your
phone number or --

yee

y on

he asked ine my name in the beginning.

Zo Q Po you have any formal massave training?
4 A No, That's why | thought (inaudible).

J. Consor & Associates Reporting & Transcription

ate
561.682.0305

98ae64ed-fabt-461a-b5d2-be85289cc56a

01913

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012349
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030611.txt,"3s 2fe 2A 24s 2s 2s 24s ois 24s 2s fe fs 2s 2c ois 2fe ois fe of 2s 2c ois 2s ois fe 2s 2s 2c ois 2fe fs 2fe 2fs fe 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe 2fs fe 2s ois 2fe ois 2fe os 2 2s ois 2s ois 2s ois 2s 2s ok 2 ok

The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

3s 2fe 2s fe 2s 2 24s ois 2fe 2h oye fs 2s 2c ois 24s of oye ofs 2s 2s ois 2fe ois 2fe ois of ofc ois 24s ois fe of 2s 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe fs fe 2s ois 2fe ois 2fe 2s fe 2s ois ofc ois 2s ois 2s 2c ok 2k ok

The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_03061 1
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025489.txt,"GUID: 112FF456-78DB-4E67-A2D6-E9BOEB32545B

Message: Catch his breath. Measured response s

Time: 06/05/19 04:59:24 AM (581428764)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 572FD397-638B-48BB-B78D-BE0C03237A48

Message: Tell him to lay off me--it's both NOT working and NOT helping

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/05/19 05:00:41 AM (581428841)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2A05932E-421C-4BB2-974B-033C845E4C55

r,

Message: Ok

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/05/19 08:59:35 AM (581443175)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 10333FA5-E222-4BDB-BDDD-25888D0 92988

Message: done.

Time: 06/05/19 09:00:01 AM (581443201)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AE194458-DCA9-4F71-A21D-O05EE2EA34B61

Message: Great

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/05/19 09:13:12 AM (581443992)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 158BE5FB-0A22-49A9-BO12-FE422AAFF6B1

Message: Report from London . Donald now thinks he is king Ivanka a princess. He
doesn't need advisors. Expecially generals that held him back . They are too narrow

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025489
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Importance: 
Thomas Jr., Landon [ 
11/7/2017 2:26:43 PM 
jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Re: 
High 
i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't 
they? 
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-
mcgowan/ the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and 
clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and 
though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. 
boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees 
were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.h  
tml 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022805 
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024797.txt,"ACKRELL
CAPITAL
Trellis trellis

Oakland, California
www.trellisgrows.com

Trellis provides inventory-management software
for the cannabis industry. The company pro-
vides software to aid cultivators, producers and
dispensary operators in tracking their business
from seed to sale. The software is designed to aid
customers in compliance.

UTOPIAN ARMS

Utopia Farms is a producer of branded can-

Utopia Farms

Santa Cruz, California
www.utopiafarms.org

nabis products. The company produces
cannabis flower, concentrates and cannabis-
infused macaroons that are available in dispen-
saries throughout California.

© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

CHAPTER VIII Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies 2018

: Trulieve

Trulieve

Quincy, Florida
www.trulieve.com

Trulieve is an operator of medical cannabis
dispensaries in Florida, offering a selection of
concentrates in the form of capsules, syringes,
tinctures and vaporizers. The company also
maintains its own cannabis cultivation facility.

VapeWorld 7 VapeWorld

Boca Raton, Florida
www.vapeworld.com

VapeWorld operates an online e-commerce web-
site dedicated to cannabis accessories. Vapor-
izers from leading manufacturers, as well as parts
and accessories, are available on its website. The
company also provides consumers with online
content about vaping.

161

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024797
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020843.txt,"This work is licensed for non-commercial distribution (but NOT for excerpting, or modifying or creating derivatives) under the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC-ND license. You can find this license at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-
nd/3.0/legalcode or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, CA, 94105, USA.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020843
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021585.txt,"<
; .
,

Page 1

09/30/2008
Case Number: 31E-MM-108062
Serial No.:

Does Accomplishment Involve

Drugs... ee ee ee ew ew ENN
A Fugitive. ......-4. : N
Bankruptcy Fraud. ...... : N
Computer Fraud/Abuse. ....:N
Corruption of Public Officials: N
Money Laundering. ...... :N

Sub. Invest. Asst by Other FOs:

RREKREREKEKE CHILD LOCATE REKEEEKRERERE

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

Stat Agent Name:
Stat Agent SOC.:

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

FINAN ANALYST
AIRCRAFT ASST
COMPUTER ASST
CONSEN MONITR
ELSUR/FISC
ELSUR/III

ENG FIELD SUP
ENG TAPE EXAM
LEGATS ASST.
EVIDNCE PURCH
INFORMANT/CW
LAB DIV EXAMS

LAB FIELD SUP
PEN REGISTERS
PHOTO COVERGE
POLYGRAPH
SRCH WAR EXEC
SHOW MONEY
SOG ASST

SWAT TEAM
TECH AG/EQUIP
TEL TOLL RECS
UCO-GROUP I
UCO-GROUP II

UCO - NAT BACK
NCAVC/VI-CAP .
CRIM/NS INTEL
CRIS NEG-FED
CRIS NEG-LOC
ERT ASST
BUTTE-ITC
SAVANNAH- ITC
POC-WRCSC

FT. MON-NRCSC
FOR LANG ASST
NON FBI LAB EX

09/30/08 18:56:35
Report Date: 09/30/2008 b6
Accom Date.: 06/30/2008 b7c
b7E

Assisting Agents SOC Subject Name

RA Squad Task Force

PBC PB2
= Used, but did not hetp
= Helped, Minimally
= Helped, Substantially
= Absolutely Essential.

FWD =

VICT-WITN COOR
10 WANTED FLYR
SARS

CART

ASSET FORF PRO
FORF SUPPORT P
TFOS/CTD
CXS/CTD
INFRAGARD/CYD
OFC/CID

PPP

Living/Deceased: Living
Date Child Located: 06/30/2008

ENTERED UPON RECEIPT

SENSITIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021585
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023903.txt,"CHAPTER 11

Restructuring the University

It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education.
—Albert Einstein

When I moved from Stanford to Yale, it was entirely because of the
efforts of Bob Abelson, a psychology professor who became my good
friend and wonderful colleague during the 15 years I was at Yale. Bob
had been instrumental in helping to create the Computer Science
Department at Yale, which is the department that wound up recruit-
ing me( Bob had hoped I would be outside the department structure
since I didn’t really fit in anywhere very well, but he couldn’t win that
argument.)

Bob told me a story about the creation of the Computer Science
Department at Yale, which involved his having to argue with another
faculty member on a university committee about why a department
should be created around a machine. He said that one member of the
committee actually asked him whether there should be a department
of lathe science as well.

We both found this to be pretty funny at the time. Now, however,
I have to admit that the guy had a point.

I have been a professor in quite a few academic departments in
my university career: linguistics, computer science, psychology, edu-
cation, and electrical engineering. These departments all have some
something in common: They have no real reason to exist. One would
assume that departments represent academic disciplines that are co-
herent in some way, but it simply isn’t so. The people in a computer
science department, for example, have in common that they all think
about computer-related issues, but so do people in other disciplines.
Some parts of computer science have more in common with math-
ematics than they do with other parts of computer science. There were
many people in the departments that I was in who worked on things
that I didn’t understand or care about. All our interchanges were about

157

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023903
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028282.txt,"THE HOUSE OF THE NOBLEMAN
CURATED BY WOLFE VON LENKIEWICZ & VICTORIA GOLEMBIOVSKAYA

PRESS CLIPPING (INTERNET)

DAZED ..:::.

http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/8775/1/the-house-of-the-nobleman
Arts & Culture

The House Of The Nobleman

Old Masters are hung in the company of some of the most notorious contemporary artists on the block in a show
opposite Frieze Art Fair

Text by John-Paul Pryor

For what is a man profited, if he gains the whole world and loses his own soul? Perhaps this is one question that
could be asked of any billionaire art collector. In The House of The Nobleman, artist Wolfe von Lenkiewicz
examines our relationship to art and the role of the supposedly worldly or noble collector from a non-
judgemental critical distance, and exhibits art both old and new (from Manet and Cézanne to The Chapmans and
Damien Hirst) in a show that promises to prove contentious. Here, Lenkiewicz’s own “resequenced” Picassos will
be exhibited against their original counterparts, effectively folding art history in upon itself to create an entirely
new kind of dialogue. Dazed Digital went down to his studio to talk nobility, history and the reasons why a lost
battle is a battle one thinks one has lost.

Dazed Digital: What is the concept that informs The House Of The Nobleman?

Wolfe von Lenkiewicz: When | started to plan the exhibition with the co-curator Victoria Golembiovskaya (by
whom | was fascinated because she was instrumental in manoeuvring a submarine in the grand canal in Venice), |
began to think about the notion of quality in the 21st century as opposed to the set of values pursued by Marsilio
Ficino. The dislocation and decertification of a stable position in the world, which was formally the aristocrat, the
king... the noble man. The artist, being perceived at the centre, was seen as a God, and within Ptolemaic
concentric rings one moved from dog, to angel, to God. This is a hierarchical linear model, which has been
attractive for five centuries in one form or another. The idea of this show is to explore a post-humanist form of
compassion — the world is dynamically changing, and no matter how flexible our map may be to quantify it, we
will be in an eternal struggle with meaning.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028282
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031269.txt,"From: Lawrence Krauss aS

Sent: 12/12/2017 1:47:22 AM

To: Lawrence Krauss

cc: nancy dahl

Subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment

Importance: — High
Is this a reasonable response? Should i even respond? Could use advice.
Mutual decisions about meeting and everything else at the time. I assumed that was clear.

Lawrence M. Krauss

Director, The Origins Project at ASU

Foundation Professor

School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department

Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Research Office: EE Assistant

Origins Office

origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/Ikraussl | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 11, 2017, at 6:00 PM, Lawrence Krauss - wrote:

Gee.. I just got out of a meeting and was trying to respond to your last one.. and I am now leaving for a 2 hour
drive to a book signing event... I will try and respond to all your emails when I get back home later tonight.. I
don’t want to rush anything off as I am already late..

On Dec 11, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Peter Aldhous <> wrote:

Dear Dr. Krauss,
Apologies for the multiple emails.

Regarding #1, you say it ""refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually
decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were
respectful and platonic encounters afterwards.""

To clarify, are you saying that this mutual decision was reached in the hotel room? Or was this discussed
subsequently?

Sincerely,
Peter Aldhous

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031269
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018293.txt,"waiting for his flight in front of a TV in the crapped-out lobby of an old hotel on the
road out of town, watching Mubarak’s promised speech. The President projected
total confidence on screen. This was the Mubarak Wisner had known in the 1980s.
There had always been a barreling self-assurance about the man; it was alive in him
now, facing the unthinkable. Ruggedly handsome and perfectly controlled. You could
almost believe, as Wisner did for a moment, “This was a great man who had led a
country through difficult times. He will endure.” Six assassination attempts. Mubarak
had always been a survivor.

Yet as he watched, Wisner knew the challenge the great man faced. Did Mubarak, he
wondered? Did he even understand what was happening around him? That he was
giving the speech on television, in the face of this strange revolutionary movement
that was unfolding on the smart phones of Cairo as much as on its streets, was a
subtle admission: Old power struggles to handle new rules. Wisner had seen tapes
of the earlier speeches, the ones intended to calm the crowds which had in fact
inflamed them further. He knew just how fine the edge Mubarak now paced.
Mubarak needed to address the protestors on their own level. He needed to show he
understood. There was only one thing he must not do, Wisner thought as he
watched. He must not address the protesters paternalistically, as a father might
speak to a child. On the screen in front of him, Mubarak continued in his steady,
slightly strident voice. “I am speaking to you all from the heart,” he said. “A speech
from a father to his sons and daughters.”

Two weeks later, Mubarak was gone.
2.

Imagine, for a moment, you are Mubarak - or really any successful early 215' century
autocrat. You’ve managed several decades of control in your Middle Eastern, North
African or Asian country. Perhaps you've inherited your position from your father or
an uncle. They’ve taught you about power. Keep it tightly controlled. Replace key
officials regularly. Execute your enemies from time to time. You’ve learned the
virtues of the hard crackdown. You've sent your security officers to the best military
schools in the US and Europe, and taught them to temper their firm grip with (a bit
of) humanity. In short, you’ve mastered the use of a strong hand and the
establishment of a certain national logic that suggested your name — Qadafi or
Mubarak or el-Abidine ben Ali - as a synonym for stability, for prosperity and even
pride. This seems to you like the most stable possible order. You know that someday
it might have to change, but that day seems a long way off. You delay reform. You
prepare your son to take over. Meanwhile, your citizens begin to acquire the
Internet and cell phones. And one day in 2008, following a financial crisis far away
from your own shores, you begin to notice an unnerving trend.

On the streets of Iceland and then Spain and then Chile and then Israel and Ukraine
and Turkey and Mexico and then New York City, thousands or hundreds of

thousands of citizens gather. There is no one leader of any of these protests. Instead
these movements breathe and grow like an organic whole. The discontent is diffuse

61

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018293
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014877.txt,"in 2H19, we view final investment decision (FID) — and an exploration program that
yields one well result every 6-8 weeks as a catalyst to rerate Hess over time.

Liza area moving towards 2bn boe

Operator Exxon recently confirmed the latest exploration test in Guyana ‘Snoek’ as the
latest discovery in the Liza development area, with ~82ft of net pay and in line with pre
drill expectations we are led to believe is in the 200-300mm boe range. Recall from our
discussions with management, Snoek was characterized as a smaller but distinct target,
updip of Liza, but lower risk.

The well was drilled in 26 days to a depth of ~17,000ft in 5,128ft of water 5 miles south
west of Liza #1, as shown in the graphic below; the Stena Carron drill ship has now
relocated to the next well test, the ‘Liza #4’ appraisal, where we anticipate results by
end April but with the possibility of a drill stem test in a success case that may push the
well result into mid-May.

Exhibit 5: Liza targeting Exhibit 6: Exxon operated blocks in Guyana

= Multi-FPSO, ExxonMobil-operated development a

- Phase 1: 100 - 120 KBD; attractive return at $40/B flat real

- FEED under way; Phase 1 AID expected in 2017

Future

potential Duscomocs

Block Size

tn
150

Liza Phase 2

Discoveries

Potential 2017-2019
opportunities

| XOM interest

Liza Phase 1

Source: Exxonmobil Source: Exxonmobil

Critically, ‘Snoek’ reinforces management's prior characterization of the Stabroek block
as moving towards a 'DHI play’ meaning the risk profile of incremental exploration
improves - a critical factor for the next well in queue, the Payara #2 appraisal that will
also target a deeper test (Pacuma)} scaled with a pre drill target of ~1bn boe. The next
prospect, Liza lookalike named ‘Turbot will likely be spud around mid-year.

From our discussions with Hess and the operator we summarize our understanding as
follows:

¢ Operator XOM had previously framed the discovered potential in the Liza /
Payara at 1.5bn — 2.0bn boe, subject to completion of two planned additional
appraisal wells. Quoting EVP Mark Albers and CEO Darren Woods

‘The success at Payara combined with the additional oil pay discovered with Liza-3
brings the total discovered resource on the block to somewhere between 1.4 billion oil
equivalent barrels and 2 billion oil equivalent barrels.’

“to clarify, what we have found - not potential upside, but what we have found is 1.4
billion to 2 billion BOE. The upside is mutti-billion barrel unrisked potential’

Bankof America <>
Merrill Lynch Hess Corp. | 11 April 2017 5

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014877
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012697.txt,"Arch gift card for free McDonalds hamburgers. A bargain is a bargain,
rich people run around like lunatics, collecting gifts for their
housekeepers. Among the shoppers are Steven and Heather Mnuchin,
Viacom’s Deborah and Philippe Dauman, Tamara Mellon, Christine Taylor
and Ben Stiller, Cate Blanchette, Susan and Robert Downey,Jr., and Debra
and Hugh Jackman.

Next stop is The Weinstein Company’s Pre-Oscar party at the Soho House,
sponsored by MontBlanc, celebrating their new charity partnership and $1
million dollar donation to the Princess Grace Foundation-USA. Long gone
are the funky Miramax Saturday night parties where nominees spoofed
their own films in homemade costumes and ad-libbed hilarious skits.
Grown men would dress as Anna Paquin and play the piano in hopes of
winning a Max Award.

There is social anxiety at the Soho House garage entrance. Guests
patiently wait as super stars whisk by. A four hundred pound gorilla
refuses to let me on the elevator until I spot Benny Medina. Once on, I
see the radiant Jennifer Lopez in the corner and remind her we met on
Len Blavatnik’s yacht in Cannes. She graciously pretends to know me. Her
manager, Benny Medina is kicking me.

I slip into Colin Firth’s booth by the front bar to have a tete-a-tete
with him and his wife Livia Giuggioli about tomorrow night. Jokingly, I
suggest when he wins to say, “I’m speechless”. Colin patiently assures
me many people, far more clever than I, have already mentioned this. He
then says that others are waging bets on whether he might subconsciously
stutter. I grill him about his wardrobe, assuming he will be wearing a
new Tom Ford tuxedo. He tells me both he and Ford will be in older
models as Ford only designs classics. I tell him I made director Charles
Ferguson, front runner for the financial documentary “Inside Job” spend
$6,000 dollars last week for a new Tom Ford tuxedo.

In the back room Jennifer Lopez is now seated with Weinstein’s wife
Georgina Chapman. Nominee Helena Bonham Carter, her husband Tim Burton
and her mother Elena circulate. Celebs have now drifted over from The
Night Before Party. The star power includes Adrien Brody, Mary-Kate and
Ashley Olsen, Cameron Diaz, Camilla Belle, Chace Crawford, Claire Danes
and Hugh Dancy, Darren Aronofsky, Emma Stone, Jaime Foxx, director John
Wells, Kerry Washington, Piers Morgan, Rachel Zoe, Russell Simmons, Sean
Parker, Sir Ben Kingsly, Zack Braff , Michelle Williams and Leonardo
Dicaprio with Bar Rafaeli. “Speech” filmmakers are functioning on high
anxiety.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012697
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011126.txt,"That leaves economics. Here | really have a one-man pantheon in Sir William Petty. |
suppose that! am the only person to have looked at his portrait alongside Isaac
Newton’s, in the Royal Society which they co-founded, and seen the two as
intellectual equals. Mill seems a clear second, thanks to his superb paragraph on
growth. The candidates for third seem well behind. Maybe Jevons or John Rae or
Leon Walras. Time has not been kind to the teachings of Keynes. I would now rank
his teacher Alfred Marshall higher. I like Myrdal’s magnificent ex ante - ex post
distinction. Boehm Bawerk and the Austrian school are underrated. The pantheon

might have room for him.

Am I being too tough on later economists? We should not forget Schultz and Ben-
Porath. Schultz’ greatest achievement, unless Mincer beat him, was in spotlighting
human depreciation. That left me to ask where this huge flow goes. The answer
becomes inescapable once we focus on the question. It gives the obvious solution to
the age-wage problem. Everything in this book is obvious. Some of it, like that

solution, is the obvious but unnoticed.

Somebody, sooner or later, breaks the news about the emperor’s new clothes. You’d
think Don Quixote would be the last to pipe up. No one in the world was more
devoted to tradition and beautiful creatures of the mind. But it takes a fool. He was
that, and so am I. Der reine tor. There have to be a few of us always. We'll get a few

windmills before they they get us.

Chapter 10: Three Pantheons 2/10/16 4

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011126
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020345.txt,"193

“There is only one door to Snowden,” Zamir wrote me. “His name is Kucherena.” Since
Zamir said Kucherena rarely saw journalists he that he had a contact in his office. He further told
me Kucherena required that any journalist seeking an interview with Snowden to submit his
questions to him two weeks in advance and, if approved, sign a document stating I would not
deviate from the questions. Next, my questions had to be translated from English to Russian
(even though Snowden does not speak Russian) and then vetted by Kucherena’s staff. Zamir
also suggested I stay at the National hotel in Red Square because Snowden has gone there for
previous meetings with Bamford. So I sent Kucherena, via Zamir, ten questions that might
interest Snowden (if they ever reached him.)

I next obtained a multi-entry Russian visa from the Russian consulate in New York, booked
myself a room in the National hotel with a view of the Kremlin and used all my remaining
frequent travel miles to book a direct flight on Aeroflot to Moscow.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020345
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018802.txt,"Retail Construction on Las Vegas Boulevard

The following table summarizes the retail construction on the Las Vegas Strip since 2000.

PROPERTY ADDRESS / LOCATION RENTABLE STATUS
Sate a Shops (Desert Passage - 3667 Las Vegas Boulevard 490,000 Complete

Showcase Mall Phase II 3785 Las Vegas Boulevard 40,000 Complete

Fashion Show Mall Expansion Phase |

3200 Las Vegas Boulevard Complete

Boulevard Collection Las Vegas Boulevard @ Sahara 50,000 Complete
Mandalay Place 3950 Las Vegas Boulevard 90,000 Complete

all Expansion Phase II 3200 Las Vegas Boulevard 609,500 Complete
Hawaiian Marketplace 3742 Las Vegas Boulevard 80,000 Complete
Forum Shops at Caesars Palace Phase Ill 3500 Las Vegas Boulevard 167,000 Complete

3325 Las Vegas Boulevard
Las Vegas Blvd @ I-215

364,000
925,000

Complete
Complete

E Harmon Ave @ Las Vegas Blvd 425,000 Complete
Showcase Mall IIl Las Vegas Blvd @ Tropicana Ave 97,320 Complete

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018802
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013589.txt,"potential is spread out in a silent market...” It was generally believed that with
adequate spiritual preparation, ayahuasca could generate transcendent states that
allowed access to ones inner being and the beings of other worlds that could serve
as sources of mystical knowledge and healing. The Shams dervish of the 13""
Century, wandering the Turkish portion of the Silk Road, used the word sohbet to
describe the inner land of mystical conversations about mystical subjects that their
turning meditation, whirling, and the shaman’s entheogenic compounds such as
DMT give entrance.

The question was whether our finding of DMT and its human brain enzyme
had been an artifact, an accidental laboratory fluke. Members of my neurochemical
research teams at the University of California Medical Schools in Irvine and La
Jolla, notably Dr. Lee Poth, now a professor of pediatric endocrinology at the
Uniform Services Medical School in Washington D.C., demonstrated that the DMT
synthesizing enzyme existed in the brains of recent accident victims that as far as
we were able to learn from their family and social histories, had been completely
psychologically normal. More than a little bit startled by this finding and worried
about making a sensational scientific mistake, we repeated the experiments with a
variety of controls with the same findings. Though our original estimates of the
human brain enzyme concentration were on the high side, we confirmed the general
finding and published them in Science in 1969 and Nature in 1970. Our carboline
work was published in the Journal of Neurochemistry in 1975. A year or so after our
Nature paper was published, the Nobel Prize winning neuropharmacologist at the
National Institutes of Mental Health, Julius Axelrod, confirmed the presence of the
DMT biosynthetic enzyme that converted the tryptophan product, tryptamine, to
DMT in mammalian brain tissue. We were both delighted and relieved.

We speculate, perhaps too grandly, that this finding, along with the beta
carboline human brain synthesizing capacity, supplies one of many possible
neurobiological and neurochemical mechanisms for the claims of the cross-cultural
universality of mystical experience. We all had human brains with these enzymes.
The idea that the phenomena accompanying primary religious experience were

common to all cultures was a major theme of the life’s work of the philosopher-

89

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013589
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031241.txt,"the ‘selfie’ photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was
requested
in the course of the investigation.”

(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies
not to include flashes, so that I don’t end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)

What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies,
and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am
particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated.
Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes
them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI
conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the
interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. I have had numerous female
graduate students, postdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever
complained of harassment. Quite the contrary in fact, as I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and
treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally.

Lawrence M. Krauss

Director, The Origins Project at ASU

Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative

Foundation Professor

School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department

Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
Origins Office

origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/Ikrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

= - -
RSU Origins
PREOGIECT

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

Begin forwarded message:

From: Peter Aldhous J

Subject: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
Date: December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST
To:

Dr. Krauss:

As you know, I’m a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations
against you. As we've already discussed by email, I’d very much like to interview you about these allegations in
detail.

In particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6
below). You claimed that “both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and
fabricated with malicious intent.” We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious
intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031241
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014687.txt,"Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 539-6 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 2

EXHIBIT F

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014687
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027199.txt,"Is Invitation: No
GUID: 499C41 BB-01A3-40F0-B24F-562BBF710CF7
Message: That's also why smart ppl and ideas are now chasing VC and private equity instead of grants

Sender:

Time: 03/04/17 03:39:12 PM (510363552)

Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8CF7D2A3-9AC3-4238-AB4C-868 | DOESF1E6

Message: Have you seen arianna Huffington's new effort? Media driven platform For health and wellness - money
from jack Ma and Jeff Bezos w connections into Amazon and Alibaba She wants to talk to me Monday and I will be in
NYC Might be another path to surgeon general in the sense of being the consumer facing health and wellness guru - like
a more evolved dr oz or Oprah but linked to products Interesting concept

Sender:

Time: 03/04/17 03:41:56 PM (510363716)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 41F070C3-CD47-45B3-A332-36CDF984499A

Message: She's got reputation and money and the whole thing dedicated to health and wellness / being on her
leadership team and the head doc is cool - jack says I could do Alibaba pop up shops on anything health wellness and sell
a zillion products of whatever kind and also as a doc present the evidence. Bezos could do something similar on Amazon.
Both are outside bill space but he likes them Also - is profitable and builds credibility towards Americas doctor /
Presenting best evidence on products and also education on certain topics (like headaches or sleep or obesity or whatever)
Of course I'm still going to work w bill a few months. But maybe start w her right after OR SOONER

Sender:

Time: 03/04/17 03:42:06 PM (510363726)

Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7EA3F264-AC7B-49DC-9296-7C33E5228E8C
Message: More Monday afternoon

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/04/17 04:12:38 PM (510365558)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 3595679E-A81A-41EE-8079-F97A5C92FBAB

Message: Just left medical advisory . Lots to do . I have zero interest

Sender: ae

Time: 03/04/17 04:17:13 PM (510365833)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: A683869A-C056-4D 10-A7DC-19688332D78B

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027199
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022193.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Importance: 
jeffrey E. <jeeyacation@gmail.com> 
Friday, January 9, 2015 7:19 PM 
Re: we'll see 
High 
Normally it's the copilots job to call out., in this instance I'm calling her out)): 
On Friday, January 9, 2015,______________________________________wrote: 
I know, I like where it's going.. 
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacationqmail.com> 
To:_______________________________ 
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM 
Subject: Re: we'll see 
It was a first draft 
On Friday, January 9, 2015, 
wrote: 
Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. 
Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other 
professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk. 
From: ieffrey E. <ieevacationomail.com> 
To:_________________________________ 
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM 
Subject: Re: we'll see 
I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his "" sex slave "" 
. obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization, which in my opinion could only have been 
made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to 
me. These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger 
place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at 
the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would 
have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as 
allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the 
Caribean Island, How he arrived. ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 
21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe, 
fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel 
records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a 
preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he 
believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging 
in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a 
professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022193 
that things are what they are supposed to be, checking her story which the presss has refused to 
do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth 
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM, 
Apparently 
wrote: 
They are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me 
Getting ugly.. 
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
To:________________________________ 
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM 
Subject: Re: we'll see 
notable? 
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Nadia <nadja2102@yahoo.com> wrote: 
Definitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel 
right. Xoxoxo 
They called my friend =today and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't 
fall for it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
2 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022194 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
3 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022195 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation(&,gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
4 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022196 
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017188.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

Mr. DERSHOWITZ. It seems to me you have an interest but no right...I can
understand how you would be offended by that. But one of the prices of living in
a complex society, with freedom, is for you to have to simply tolerate the fact that
you know that certain people are engaging in conduct that you don’t approve of.
That was precisely the argument made by the State of Connecticut in the birth
control [clinic] case.*° They said that people of the State of Connecticut are
offended by knowing that this kind of immoral conduct is being engaged in by
people, married people, all over the State. And the Supreme Court did say that
this is something that members of the society must tolerate in a pluralistic society.
There are a great many things which offend me, to know that they’re going on in
peoples’ homes—I have an interest in that, but I don’t think I have a protected
constitutional right [to be] disturbed about what’s going on.

Judge Julian asked whether “that interest [should] be legally protected?”

Mr. DERSHOWITZ. Now, there may be ways of protecting it, perhaps through zoning
regulations...

But if the issue is total banning on the one hand as against your interests being protected
against knowing people are doing this kind of thing, I would submit that the Constitution
has a clear answer to that. It must permit the film to be shown in a way to minimize your
exposure to it and to permit you both fully to see and to avoid being exposed to the
contents of the film.

So I do submit that your Honor does have an interest and I can understand it. But I think
you will realize that on balance this interest could be used to upset almost every kind of
freedom that Americans ought to be at liberty to engage in.”

Judge Aldrich seemed intrigued by our argument, while continuing to press me hard on its
implications. At one point Judge Aldrich asked me what I would do if the Supreme Court ruled
against my theory. “Will that be the end of the road...?”

I responded: “Well, I, as an attorney, will continue to urge the Court to accept this principle
because I think it’s the correct approach to the regulation of obscenity.”

Following three days of intensive argument and questioning, the three judges issued a decision
written by Judge Aldrich. He bought my argument totally. He began by accepting my assumption
about the nature of the film:

For purposes of this case we assume that the film is obscene by standards currently applied
by the Massachusetts courts.

He then went on to discuss the implications of the Stanley decision, which the prosecutor had
argued was “irrelevant” to this case and which, at the beginning of my argument, thought was not
relevant to movie theaters:

35 Griswold v. Conn

101

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017188
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023095.txt,"income from such securities and other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuate and that price or value of such securities and instruments may rise or fall and, in some cases, investors may

or
ine
UK
ocated outsi

uding AD

ime, hold a
BofA Merrill
w
methods of
recipient of
In the event
therewith

rading position (long or

h
his report.

that the recipient receiv
LPF&S may be deemed

ref|
be more or less positive than a stock
BofA Merrill Lynch is aware that the i
acti

de of the United Kingdom. BofA
LPF&S or one of its affiliates is a regular issuer of traded financial instru

Lynch, through business units other than Bo
th, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in
€ persons who prepared them, and BofA

's fundamental equi
mplemen

y rating.

rt.

errill Lynch Global Researe

short) in the securities and financial

errill Lynch is un

ed this report pursuant to a contract

beyond the delivery of this report (unless otherwise agreed specifically in

transactions, including transactions i

nany securities mentioned in this re

Copyright and General Information regarding Research Reports:

Copyright 2017 Bank of America Con

retransmitted or disclosed, in whole
simultaneously to internal

review of this research report consti
(including any investmen
Materials p

BofA
researc
hould

errill Lynch Global
h reports. To tl
consult their ow
ny BofA Merrill Lynch en
n public information. Fac
rofessionals in other busi
his re
ities. None of MLPF&S, any of i
Research policy prohibits rese
containing such rating, recom
ormation relating to the tax s
ax advice based
The information herein (o
ontain links to third-
ined on such third-party websi
any affiliation with BofA Merrill Lyne
submitting any personal in

os

é)
a

recent research report rela

In some cases, an issuer may be classified as Restric
instruments) to be suspended or withdrawn and should
financial instruments) nor should the analyses or opinion(s) be considered a solicita

its security and/or financia

solicit purchases of securities or fina

ormation to them. BofA
Certain outstanding reports may contain discussions and/or investment opinions re
ing to an issuer prior to making an investment decision.
ed or may be Under Review or Extended Review. In each case, investors should consider any investment opinion
not rely on the analyses and investment opinion(s) pertaining to such issuer (or i
ion of any kind. Sales persons and financial advisors affiliated with MLPF&S or any of its affiliates may not
s that are Restricted or Under Review and may only solicit securities under Extended Review in accordance with

recommendations, estimates or price targets) without
repared by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel are ba:
information known to, professionals in other business areas of BofA Merri
Research and certain business groups. As a resul
he extent this report discusses any legal proceeding or issues, it has not been prepared as nor is it intended to express any legal conclusion, opinion or advice. Investors

egal advisers as to issues of law relating to the subject matter of this report. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel’s knowledge of legal proceedings in which
ity and/or its directors, officers and employees may be
5 and views presented in this material that rela
ness areas of BofA Merrill Lynch in connection with the legal proceedings or matters relevant to such proceedings.
port has been prepared independently of any issuer of securities mentioned herein and not in connection with any proposed offering of securities or as agent of
s affiliates or their research analysts has any authority whatsoever to make any representation or warranty on behalf of the issuer(s). Bo
arch personnel from disclosing a recommendation, investment rating, or investment thesis for review by an issuer prior to the pub

mendation or investment thesis.

es is not part o
h. Access to any

ncial instrumen

on may be limited by regulations prohibiting or restricting ""shortselling"" in many jurisdictions. Investors are urged
executing any short idea contained in this repo!
Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect
Rs, effectively assume currency risk.
Readers: The protections provided by the U.K. regulatory regime, including the Financial Services Scheme, co not a
h policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.
ments linked to securities that may have been recommended in this report. ML

instrum

port.

sed on
I Lynch
, BofA

errill Lynch and are not publicly-available materials. Any unautl

s Coverage Cluster. Short

ation of the ideas expressed in this report may depend upon an investor's ability to ""short"" securities or ot
o seek advice regarding the applica

he value, price or income of any security or financial instrument mentioned in this report. Inves

ents discussed in this report.

‘A Merrill Lynch Global Research, may have issued and may in the future issue trading ideas or recommenda
his report. Such ideas or recommendations reflect the different time
der no obligation to ensure that such other trading ideas or recommendations are brought

between the recipient and MLPF&S for the provision of research services for a separate fee,
o be acting as an investment adviser, such status relates, if at all, solely to the person with whom MLPF&S
writing by MLPF&S). MLPF&S is and continues to act solely as a broker-dealer in connection

poration. All rights reserved. iQmethod, iQmethod 2.0, iQprofile, iQtoolkit, iQworks are service marks of Ban
iQcustom®, iQdatabase® are registered service marks of Bank of America Corporation. This research report is prepared for the use of BofA Merri
or in part, or in any form or manner, without
and client websites and other portals by BofA
utes your agreement not to redistribute, retransmi

he express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch. BofA Merri
, or disclose to others the contents, opinions, co
public information. Facts and views presented in this material

, including investment banking personnel. BofA Merrill Lynch
errill Lynch does not disclose certain client relationships wit

plaintif

e to an

s, defendants, co-defendants or co-plaintiffs wi

erent from and co not affect a stocl

pply in general to business coordinated by BofA Merri

jose their entire principal investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Levels and basis for taxation may change.

This report may contain a short-term trading idea or recommendation, which highlights a specific near-term catalyst or event impacting the issuer or the market that is anticipated to have a
short-term price impact on the equity securities of the issuer. Short-term trading ideas and recommendations are dif
ects both a longer term total return expectation and attractiveness for investment relative to other stocks within i

's fundamental equity rating, which

-term trading ideas and recommendations may

her financial instruments and that such
bility of such regulations prior to

ors in such securities and instruments,

I Lynch entities

PF&S or one of its affiliates may, at any

ions that are inconsistent
rames, assumptions, views and analytical
o the attention of any

and in connection
ly and does not extend
with the execution of any

has contracted direct

of America Corporation. iQanalytics®,
| Lynch clients and may not be redistributed,
Lynch Global Research reports are distributed

horized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and
nclusion, or information con
first obtaining expressed permission from an authorized officer of BofA Merrill Lynch.

ained in this report

have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect
has established information barriers between
h, or compensation received from, such issuers in

h or involving issuers mentioned in this report is based

y such proceedings have not been reviewed by, discussed wit

atus of financial instruments discussed herein is not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone to provide tax advice.
on their particular circumstances from an independent tax professional.
her than disclosure information relating to BofA Merrill Lynch and its affiliates) was obtained from various sources and we do not guarantee its accuracy. This report
party websites. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsible for the content of any third-party website or any linked content contained in a third-par'
this report and is not incorporated by reference into this report. The inclusion of a link in this report does not im
third-party website is at your own risk, and you should always review the terms and privacy policies at third-party websi

errill Lynch is not responsible for such terms and privacy policies and expressly disclaims any liability for them.
ating to securities, financial instruments and/or issuers that are no longer curren

h, and may not reflect information known to,

any issuer of any
A Merrill Lynch
ication of a research

nvestors are urged to

bsite. Content
endorsement by or
es before

y we
ply any

. Always refer to the most

relating to such issuer (or
s securities and/or

irm policies.

Neither BofA Merrill Lynch nor any officer or employee of BofA Merrill Lynch accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential damages or losses arising from any use of

this report or its contents.

Bankof America
Merrill Lynch

Equity Strategy Focus Point | 29 January 2017

27

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023095
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015599.txt,"Filing # 25919336 E-Filed 04/09/2015 05:23:25 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 171!
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

CIVIL DIVISION

BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072
PAUL G. CASSELL,

Plaintiffs,

V.

ALAN DERSHOWITZ,
Defendant.

MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING
SUBPOENA SERVED ON NON-PARTY JANE DOE NO. 3

Non-party Jane Doe 3, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rules
of Civil Procedure 1.410(c)(1)', hereby moves for an order quashing the subpoena duces tecum
served on her by Defendant, or alternatively, pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280(c)

for issuance of a protective order sharply limiting the scope of the subpoena.
INTRODUCTION

This Court should quash the subpoena issued to non-party Jane Doe No. 3 as it is
unreasonable and oppressive. The Defendant is abusing the subpoena power in an effort to
intimidate, harass and cause undue burden to a non-party. Indeed, Defendant - just days ago -
publicly admitted that his goal of deposing Jane Doe No. 3 has nothing to do with this Florida
Defamation Action; rather, he is trying to find a way to send this victim of sexual trafficking to

“Jail.” “She was hiding in Colorado...but we found her and she will have to be deposed. The end

* For the limited purpose of the Motion to Quash or for Protective Order and resolving the scope of the
subpoena and any enforcement issues, Jane Doe No. 3 voluntarily submits herself to this Court’s
jurisdiction.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015599
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012407.txt,"—_

oO oOo ON OD oO Pe wH ON

- WwW DM

~0929104. TXT
14

A. After it happened.

Q.
don’t you, yes or no?
Ae
Q. In fact, let's go to Exhibit 20-01.
MR. GOLDBERGER: Look behind you. You'l]
see it.
BY MR. TEIN:
Q. Have you ever seen that picture before?
A. Yes.
Q. Is that a picture of your father, your

stepmother and Mr. Herman at the press conference
regarding your lawsuit?
A. Yes.
Q. Now you know that this is a very serious
matter, don't you?
MR. LEOPOLD: Asked and answered.
Objection.
MR. GOLDBERGER: All right. You can
object. You're representing a witness here,
Mr. Leopold. You can object on privilege grounds.
You cannot make legal objections. You have no
standing to do so.
MR. LEOPOLD: I'm going to make them and
then --

15
MR. GOLDBERGER: We're --
MR. LEOPOLD: We're going to leave or we're
going to take a break because his demeanor is not

appropriate. There's no reason to have this kind
Page 12

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012407
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016090.txt,"HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016090
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033226.txt,"From: Thomas Jr., Landon 
Sent: 2/15/2017 3:48:18 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Markets and DJT 
Importance: High 
I am writing a story about how markets keep ripping ahead despite political craziness. VIX so low, etc. 
You must get a lot of this in talking to clients -- people freaking out about headlines as markets hit 
new highs. How do you spin this to them? One hedgie Trump supporter told me that Trump is the 
highest beta prez ever -- ie the highs will be high but so will be the lows. 
Question: how closely does DJT track market moves? I know he tweets about Dow 20,000 but how 
aware do you think he is about how market really betting big on him. Does he talk to Barrack about 
this? Cohn? 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.h  
tml 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033226 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029047.txt,"Western Europe, it’s going to come to the United Kingdom. And so I think we are in a
crisis of the underpinnings of capitalism, and on top of that we’re now, I believe, at the

beginning stages of a global war against Islamic fascism.

“With all the baggage that those [right-wing]
groups bring — and trust me, a lot of them
bring a lot of baggage, both ethnically and

racially— but we think that will all be worked
through with time.”

Benjamin Harnwell, Human Dignity Institute: Thank you, Steve. That was a
fascinating, fascinating overview. I am particularly struck by your argument, then, that in
fact, capitalism would spread around the world based on the Judeo-Christian foundation
is, in fact, something that can create peace through peoples rather than antagonism,
which is often a point not sufficiently appreciated. Before I turn behind me to take a
question —

Bannon: One thing I want to make sure of, if you look at the leaders of capitalism at that
time, when capitalism was I believe at its highest flower and spreading its benefits to most
of mankind, almost all of those capitalists were strong believers in the Judeo-Christian
West. They were either active participants in the Jewish faith, they were active
participants in the Christians’ faith, and they took their beliefs, and the underpinnings of
their beliefs was manifested in the work they did. And I think that’s incredibly important
and something that would really become unmoored. I can see this on Wall Street today —
I can see this with the securitization of everything is that, everything is looked at as a
securitization opportunity. People are looked at as commodities. I don’t believe that our
forefathers had that same belief.

Harnwell: Over the course of this conference we’ve heard from various points of view
regarding alleviation of poverty. We’ve heard from the center-left perspective, we’ve

heard from the socialist perspective, we’ve heard from the Christian democrat, if you will,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029047
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012867.txt,"When clinicians diagnose individuals with a mental disorder, they are making a statement about
deviance, about what falls within and outside the range of normal mental states. Unfortunately, there are
no clear categories, no bright lines separating normal from abnormal or uncommon. As the distinguished
American psychologist William James noted, however, studying “the abnormal is the best way to
understand the normal.” Let’s follow this logic.

Consider the developmental disorder of autism. This disorder, typified by difficulties
understanding what others believe and feel, ranges from individuals who appear locked out of the world,
rocking back and forth to their own internal rhythm, to high functioning individuals such as Professor
Temple Grandin, who not only teaches college-level courses, but has done wonders as a spokesperson for
autism and for the animal welfare movement. This range already tells us that autism is represented by a
spectrum, once identified by purely behavioral measures, but joined today by genetic and neurobiological
markers. The genetic evidence is particularly helpful for explaining the observed variation. For example,
the MAOA gene, located on the X chromosome, is involved in the regulation of social behavior and has
different forms that map to differences in brain activity and stress physiology. The different forms
correspond to the number of copies of the genetic material. This copy number is, in turn, partially
responsible for the spectrum of autism observed, especially the degree of social dysfunction, including
stress and aggression. Once we admit to a spectrum, and begin to pinpoint the factors that push
individuals to stand on one end or the other, we must admit to admitting virtually everyone onto this
spectrum. All of us, at some point in our life, have lacked sensitivity to the feelings and beliefs of others.
All of us have been self-absorbed and locked out from the rest of the world. All of us have failed to
express empathy and compassion to others. All of us have been a bit abnormal in this sense. All of us
fall, on occasion, within the spectrum of autism as well as other disorders of the mind such as
psychopathy.

Like autism, psychopathy is not one neat and tidy disorder, but a spectrum. Diagnostically,
psychopaths are impulsive, narcissistic, and lacking in social emotions such as empathy, remorse, and
guilt. These behaviorally defined characteristics are complimented by genetic and neurobiological
markers, some pointing to risks in the pre-school years, and linked to the same MAOA gene noted above.
The spectrum that defines psychopaths ranges from hyper-smart, calculating, and powerful politicians to
low IQ, downtrodden, serial murderers. Everyone of us occasionally shows our psychopathic face: self-
absorbed, impatient, manipulative, and uncaring. What is abnormal, then, is living with these
characteristics, all the time. Clinically diagnosed psychopaths, like clinically diagnosed individuals with
autism, have the characteristic traits as stable components of their personality. An honest clinician will
tell you, however, that stability is difficult to define, and so too are the essential traits. An honest brain

scientist will also tell you that, despite the observation that psychopaths have hyperactive dopamine brain

Hauser Chapter 4. Wicked in waiting 12]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012867
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019105.txt,"From: Darren Indyke 
Sent: 8/17/2016 3:27:07 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE 
JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!! 
Attachments: 2016.08.16 - Draft Letter to Eric Rayman re Epstein Book re Steven Hoffe....docx; Untitled attachment 110187.htm; 
Ex. A - 2016.08.11 - Hoffenberg Email re Being on Book Writing Tea m.pdf; Untitled attachment 110190.htm; Ex. B - 
1997.03.05 - Sentencing Opinion.pdf; Untitled attachment 110193.htm; Ex. C - 2014.12.16 - Consent Decree re NY 
Post.pdf; Untitled attachment 110196.htm; Ex. D - 2016.07.05 - Order Dismissing Case.pdf; Untitled attachment 
110199.htm 
Importance: High 
Privileged - Redacted 
DARREN K. INDYKE 
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC 
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor 
New York, New York 10022 
Telephone: 
Telecopier: 
Mobile: 
email: 
****************************************************************************************** 
************ 
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client 
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication 
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this 
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. 
Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - 0 2016 Darren K. 
Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved. 
****************************************************************************************** 
************* 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Michael, Charles"" < 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 019105 
Subject: RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING 
FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 
2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!! 
Date: August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT 
To: 'Darren Indyke' < 
Darren: 
Privileged - Redacted 
Best, 
Charles 
From: Darren Indyke [mailto  
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM 
To: Michael, Charles 
Subject: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE 
JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM!!!! 
i Privileged Redacted i 
i i 
i _ i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i i 
i 
i 
1 
i 
, 
Thanks, 
Regards, 
Darren 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 019106 
DARREN K. INDYKE 
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC 
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor 
New York, New York 10022 
Telephone: 
Telecopier: 
Mobile: 
email: 
****************************************************************************************** 
************ 
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client 
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication 
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this 
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. 
Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC -42016 Darren K. 
Indyke, PLLC 4 All rights reserved. 
****************************************************************************************** 
************* 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: steven hoffenberg <> 
Subject: Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE 
JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON 
THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!! 
Date: August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT 
To: 
Steven J. Hoffenberg 
New York Post Publishing INC. 
CEO 
WHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS 
TOWERSINVESTORS.COM  
CEO 
SEE 
WWW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER 
MR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 019107 
PUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: steven hoffenberg 
Date: August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT 
To: ""Players2 ."" <_____________________________> 
Subject: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER 
UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEV 
EN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!! 
C E 0 STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC 
TO ROGER STONE 
CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FE 
DS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BO 
OK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 !!!!! 
STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM. 
WIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!! 
STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS 
!!!!! 
Steven J. Hoffenberg 
New York Post Publishing INC. 
CEO 
WHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS 
TOWERSINVESTORS.COM 
CEO 
SEE 
WWW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER 
MR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER 
PUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM  
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 019108 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010576.txt,"appearance before the grand jury in the Southern District of Florida. This

conversation occurred when Mr. Epstein was aboard his privately owned civilian

aircraft in Miami in the Southern District of Florida. His pilot had filed a flight

plan showing the parties were about to return to Teterboro, NJ. After the

conversation with Ms. Groff, Mr. Epstein became concerned that the FBI would

try to serve his traveling companion, Nadia Marcinkova, with a similar grand jury

subpoena. In fact, the agents were preparing to serve Ms. Marcinkova with a

target letter when the flight landed in Teterboro. Mr. Epstein then redirected his

airplane, making the pilot file a new flight plan to travel to the US Virgin Islands

instead of the New York City area, thereby keeping the Special Agents from
serving the target letter on Nadia Marcinkova. During the flight, the defendant
verbally harassed Ms. Marcinkova, harassing and pressuring her not to cooperate

with the grand jury's investigation, thereby hindering and dissuading her from

reporting the commission of a violation of federal law to a law enforcement

officer, namely, Special Agents of the FBI. Epstein also threatened and harassed

Sarah Kellen against cooperating against him as well.

21. | Edwards learned that the Palm Beach police department investigation ultimately
led to the execution of a search warrant at Epstein’s mansion in October 2005. See Police
Incident Report, Exhibit “A”.

22. Edwards learned that at around the same time, the Palm Beach Police Department
also began investigating Epstein’s sexual abuse of minor girls. They also collected evidence of
Epstein’s involvement with minor girls and his obsession with training sex slaves, including
pulling information from Epstein’s trash. Their investigation showed that Epstein ordered from
Amazon.com on about September 4, 2005, such books as: SM101: A Realistic Introduction, by
Jay Wiseman; SlaveCraft: Roadmaps for Erotic Servitude - Principles, Skills, and Tools, by Guy
Baldwin; and Training with Miss Abernathy: A Workbook for Erotic Slaves and Their Owners,
by Christina Abernathy. See Receipt for Sex Slave Books (Exhibit “I’).

23. The Palm Beach incident reports provided Edwards with the names of numerous

witnesses that participated in Epstein’s child molestation criminal enterprise and also provided

il

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010576
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029721.txt,"the lead-up to Iraq's invasion in 1990.
When faced with a build-up of Iraqi
forces along its border, Kuwait decided
not to mobilize its military out of fear
that the move would provoke Saddam
Hussein. The incentives for Gulf states to
make similar strategic calculations in the
future will be greater when Iran has an
inventory of nuclear weapons to match its
growing ballistic missile capabilities.

The Gulf states, moreover, will likely
reason that the U.S. capability to threaten
or use force against a nuclear Iran will be
significantly diminished. Even without
nuclear weapons, Gulf states have seen,
in their view, a long history of American
reluctance to threaten or use force against
Iran. For example, the United States took
no direct military action against Iran after
it aided and abetted Hezbollah bombings
against Americans in Lebanon in the
1980s, after Iran supported the bombing
of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in
1996, or even after Iran supported the
deadly campaign of improvised explosive
devices (IEDs) against U.S. troops in
Iraq. Gulf states will no doubt judge that
if the United States was unable and
unwilling to attack Tehran under these
circumstances, then it is certainly not
going to attack Iran in the future, when it
will be able to retaliate with nuclear
weapons.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029721
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030270.txt,"the revolution are being applied by an agent, the army, which I think
is Sincere in wanting to do the right things, but it is not by nature
revolutionary.”

To their credit, the Egyptian generals moved swiftly to put in place a
pathway to democracy: elections for a new Parliament were set for
September; this Parliament will then oversee the writing of a new
Constitution, and then a new civilian president will be elected.
Sounds great on paper, and it was endorsed by a referendum, but
there’s one big problem: The Tahrir Square revolution was a largely
spontaneous, bottom-up affair. It was not led by any particular party
or leader. Parties are just now being formed. If elections for the
Parliament are held in September, the only group in Egypt with a real
party network ready to roll is the one that has been living
underground and is now suddenly legal: the Islamist Muslim
Brotherhood.

“Liberal people are feeling some concerns that they made the
revolution and the Muslim Brotherhood can now take it. This is not
true,” Esam el-Erian, one of the party’s leaders, insisted to me.

But that is exactly what the urban, secular moderates, who actually
did spearhead the Tahrir revolt, fear. They are only now forming
parties and trying to build networks that can reach the millions of
traditional Egyptians living in the countryside and persuade them to
vote for a reform agenda and not just: “Islam is the answer.”

“The liberal parties need more time to organize,” said Naguib
Sawiris, an Egyptian billionaire who’s heading the best organized of
the liberal parties, and is urging all the liberal groups to run under a
single banner and not divide their vote.

If elections happen in September and the Muslim Brotherhood wins a
plurality it could have an inordinate impact on writing Egypt’s first
truly free Constitution and could inject restrictions on women,
alcohol, dress, and the relations between mosque and state. “You will

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030270
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011668.txt,"emergency cabinet meeting the next day. His adviser on terrorism, Gideon
Machanaimi, was someone I knew well. When the cabinet convened, he pointed
out to the ministers that the London terrorists were from a fringe Palestinian
group led by Abu Nidal. Far from being an ally of Arafat, he had been
sentenced to death by Fatah. According to Gideon, Begin wasn’t interested in
the distinction. Even less so were the two leading military figures in attendance:
Arik and Raful. They said all Palestinian terror was the responsibility of Arafat,
and that now was the time to hit back hard. The cabinet was informed that our
initial response would be limited: aerial and artillery bombardment of PLO
targets throughout Lebanon. Yet Raful told the cabinet that the Palestinians
would almost certainly respond with shell and rocket fire into Israel. Then, he
said, we could strike more forcefully. In other words, the invasion would begin.

It did. Dubbed “Operation Peace for Galilee” to convey the aim of protecting
northern Israel from shell and rocket fire, it got underway at around 11 a.m. on
Sunday June 6. The publicly declared aim was Little Pines: the establishment of
our 40-kilometer security zone. Both Israelis and the Americans were led to
believe it would be a relatively short operation aimed at destroying the PLO’s
military capacity in the border area. We also said that we wouldn’t attack Syrian
forces as long as they didn’t attack us.

That last public pledge had particular relevance to my role on the ground. I
was deputy commander of the largest of Israel’s three invasion forces, under
Yanoush Ben-Gal, head of the northern command until shortly before the war.
We had 30,000 troops and 600 tanks and were responsible for the “eastern
sector’ — from the edge of the Golan Heights, north through the Bekaa Valley
along Lebanon’s border with Syria. At first, we deliberately stopped short of
Syrian forces. We deployed our main reserve division just 10 kilometers across
the border, below the first Syrian positions at the bottom of the Bekaa. But
despite the public assurances we were in Lebanon to establish our security zone,
we had no orders to halt at the 40-kilometer line. From day one, our part of the
invasion force began a pincer movement around the area of eastern Lebanon
where large numbers of Syrian soldiers were based. My former Sinai division,
the 252™, came down from the Golan and started making its way up alongside
the Syrian border. Our other units, further inland, also began pushing
northward.

For the first couple of days, we did avoid a confrontation with the Syrians.
Yet on June 8, day three of the war, the morphing of Little Pines into Big Pines
began.

197
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011668
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029978.txt,"Date: Friday, July 15 2016 03:40 AM 
Subject: Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein 
From: 
To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@grnail.corn>; 
How did they get access to this and how is it legal that they are posting this? 
This message is directed to and is for the use of the above-noted addressee only, and its contents may be legally 
privileged or confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any distribution, dissemination, or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message 
in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. This message is not intended to be an electronic 
signature nor to constitute an agreement of any kind under applicable law unless otherwise expressly indicated 
hereon. 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreplyggoogle.com> 
Date: July 14, 2016 at 10:54:36 PM EDT 
To: ___________________ 
Subject: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein 
Jeffrey Epstein 
uaily upaate • July i, 2016 
NEWS 
Daily Mail 
Shocking VIDEO from inside Florida mansion of Bill Clinton's friend Jeffrey 
Epstein 
Daily Mail 
These were the images that police found when they searched evil Jeffrey Epstein's waterfront mansion. 
Now Daily Mail Online has exclusively ... 
xl 
Flag as irrelevant 
You have received this email because you have subscribed to Google Alerts. 
Unsubscribe 
x Receive this alert as RSS feed 
Send Feedback 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029978 
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030639.txt,"From: Linda Stone [as

Sent: 9/26/2016 5:14:01 AM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

SPEAK! Please. What do you think?

On Sep 25, 2016, at 12:15 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

do you think he can win?

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Linda Stone [i wrote:

Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out
if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might

offer) are worth working on....

And wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes

trump appealing and his flaws invisible...
Will you have a cabinet position?

How are you?

Co-authored with iPhone auto-correct

On Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

bring me up to speed.

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030639
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033188.txt,"From: Richard Kahn [i

Sent: 11/10/2016 8:32:13 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: INTERACTIVE: Where does Donald Trump’s money come from?

Importance: — High

http: //therealdeal .com/2016/10/11/where-does-donald-trumps-money-come-from/

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033188
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012361.txt,"BW Nw

wa m oO

Nes

it
1?
13
14
lb
16
1?
18
aS)
20

°°
ce

22
ye
24

Zo

19
1}
lé
13
14
15
16
slay
18
13
20
22
23
24
25

A Yeuh.
Q Okay.
A Well ano.

Jt was the second lime that! gave him

apiassage. ‘The first time F went up with : 4
Q Okay, You went upstairs with Ey i 5
A No, ! was in the kitchen. : &
Q You were in the kitchen. That was -- you only had : 7
iyo limes that you wenl there? : 8
A Youh, 9
QQ) The firsi time you didn't do anythmg but just sit i10
in the kitchen? i7
A Yeuh, 4?
Q Who did vou sit in the kitehen with? °43
A Tle had a cook that was there and he had -- there i 14
was ke two other girls there that live wrth him. ilb
Q Okay. Did you massage his back? Was he naked :16
when vou were massaping hn’? : 1?
A Well. he bad like a towel around his -- his upper ils
was (inaudible) but he had like a towel around him. i419
Q Okay. Did he ever remove that towel? 20
A No. 21

Q When vou were inassuging him he never removed the
towel?

A No
Q Okay. Did you -- did he have vou touch his
Page
private area? 1
A No. No. J wouldn't du that. {Audio at 5:50) 2
Q You wouldn't do that? 3
Okay. Did he touch vou in your private area? 4
A No. No. 5
QQ No. 6
A Ee kept Ithe staring af ie and Like, 1 don't knesw, a
Tyust felt uncomfortable and] left. But] heard other &
stories that like -- S
QQ Right. Pm concerned with vou | know about : 10
other stories and I’ve interviewed other people have told me f 11
different things. ‘Vhat’s why I'm Uving te find out what 12
happened tu vou. Okay? 13
A Uh-huh i414
Q You're the viernn in this so that's why Tia using :15
to Fmd out what happens to vou. 16
A Uh-huh. :17
Q Okay? Who teak you upstairs to the moon? :18
A This oir that hives with him. : 19
Q a So Bok: vou up? : 20

A :Z1

Q io she tell vou anything? )id she say anvihing? 122
A Huh-huh. There's a massage lable and she just 223
laid a towel down and she said that Jeffrey will be out for i24
his massage. :25

like, you know, Eke

Q Okay. Have vou received any massage tuning?
A No
() No fhave to ask.
Was one of the two girls that was in the
kitehen wath you?
A Yes.
(2) Okay, Did vou ever go back to his house?

A Well. 1 just went there vice.
() Right
A After that --
Q Alter that you've never come back? Never went
back?
How much did vou receive for the massage?
A ‘Iwo hundred.
Q You received 200. {Audio at 7:43)
Okay. Did I explain to you what ¥ as going to
be invelved?
A She said the first Gme vou go there vou pretty
much just give a massage, but the more you go there like the
mare he expects. And that's it. That seared me.
Q That's what seared you?
BY DETECTIVIE DAWSON:
QQ) Pal she say (inaudible) or did she Gnandibie --
A Sav didn't have to say thesactly but she implied
cing your clothes ulf and stuff like :

Page G

thal.
BY DETECTIVE RECAREY:
Q Okay. So you didn’t remove any of vour clothing?
A No
Qo. What were you wearing?) Can you remember?
A Edon't knew [twas along time apo. | don't
remember enactly.
Q) Okuy.
A T don't want lo tell you wrong.
QQ TRnow. And Pknow vou already told vour moni what
happened. And hike | said d know thos is hard for veau
but...
A dasas just scared. P just didn't want my name to
hke --
Q  Dovtworry, Youre not the only person [ve
talked to. Okav? There's a tot of people that I've talked
te and I'm going to talk to.
Yow did vou gel to his house?
A) Wih
Q. Naley.
m the kitchen.
A Yeah,
Q What about the second lime?
A The second ume ! drove and she came with me.
Bevanse [ didn't want to --

took vou the first time and you sat

3 {Pages 6 to 9)

02422

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012361
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024967.txt,"10

a hostile Middle East environment shaped by Israel’s overwhelming
victory over the Arabs in the 1967 war, its seizure of extensive Arab
territories including Syria’s Golan Heights and its subsequent close
alliance with the United States, which put in place a sort of dual US-
Israeli regional hegemony from which Syria and its allies have sought
to free themselves ever since. The 1973 war waged by Egypt and
Syria to recover lost territories and force Israel to negotiate a global
peace had some initial success but failed to realise its objectives.
Instead, Egypt made a separate peace with Israel in 1979 and was
removed from the Arab line up. The rest of the region was then
exposed to the full force of Israeli power.

Looking to its defences, Syria established a partnership in 1979 with
the newborn Islamic Republic of Iran. And once Israel invaded
Lebanon in 1982 in a bid to expel Syrian influence, destroy the PLO
and bring Lebanon into its orbit, Syria found local allies among the
Shia resistance movements of South Lebanon -- of which Hizbullah
became the most prominent. Waging a guerrilla war, and benefiting
from logistical support and weapons from Iran and Syria, Hizbullah
managed to force Israel out of South Lebanon in 2000, after an 18-
year occupation. From this was born the Tehran-Damascus-Hizbullah
axis, which over the years grew into the principal regional challenger
of the United States and Israel.

Both the United States and Israel have done their utmost to disrupt
this axis and prevent it acquiring any effective deterrent capability:
Iran has faced constant demonisation, sanctions and threat of military
attack because of its nuclear programme, while Israel has made
repeated attempts to destroy Hizbullah, including its war on Lebanon
in 2006. Syria, in turn, has faced intimidation, isolation, US sanctions
and an Israeli attack in 2007 on its alleged nuclear facility.

Bashar has had to wrestle with his own crises. He survived George
W. Bush’s “global war on terror” after 9/11, then faced the greater

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024967
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027827.txt,"Message: He would be onboard correct ???

Time: 06/28/19 09:55:04 AM (583433704)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: A226C61A-3372-44B1-AlE9-AC64D8 6ES5D2B

Message: Or should I ask?

Time: 06/28/19 09:55:08 AM (583433708)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: OFES5C81-994F-4380-B687-1CFCO8F14DE1

r

Message: Easy for me

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/28/19 09:55:18 AM (583433718)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: D2EC900B-CDE2-47CC-B1C4-6C46FCO0D9D4

Message: Ask. And yes

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/28/19 09:55:25 AM (583433725)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 599372A0-DE85-4B5A-A8 6E-1E6DDC 64DBAB

Message: I could of course

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/28/19 09:55:41 AM (583433741)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2A8FCBD5-E4AD-491F-A874-DC05C1517466

Message: Im dealing with Ehud in Israel. Making me crazy

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027827
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031527.txt,"Press is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: PO

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the
hillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner. its
disgraceful, but. here we are

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031527
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017836.txt,"IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

771

Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

tirely on factual allegations, and would
prevail even if defendants made contrary
arguments. Fed.Rules  Civ.Proc.Rule
12(b)(2), 28 U.S.C.A.

35. Federal Courts <-96

In resolving motions to dismiss for
lack of personal jurisdiction, the district
court reads the complaints and affidavits
in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs.
Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b)(2), 28
U.S.C.A.

36. Federal Courts <-96

In resolving a motion to dismiss for
lack of personal jurisdiction, the district
court will not accept legally conclusory
assertions or draw argumentative infer-
ences. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b)(2),
28 U.S.C.A.

37. Federal Courts €417

A federal court sitting in diversity ex-
ercises personal jurisdiction over a foreign
defendant to the same extent as courts of
general jurisdiction of the state in which it
sits. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 4(k)(1)(A),
28 U.S.C.A.

38. Courts €12(2.20)

For New York’s long-arm statute to
provide a basis for personal jurisdiction in
a civil conspiracy action, the plaintiffs are
not required to establish the existence of a
formal agency relationship between the de-
fendants and their putative co-conspira-
tors. N.Y.McKinney’s CPLR 302(a)(@).

39. Courts €12(2.20)

The bland assertion of conspiracy is
insufficient to establish personal jurisdic-
tion under New York’s long-arm statute.
N.Y.McKinney’s CPLR 302(a)(2).

40. Courts €12(2.20)

To establish personal jurisdiction on a
conspiracy theory under New York’s long-
arm statute, the plaintiffs must make a
prima facie showing of conspiracy, allege

specific facts warranting the inference that
the defendant was a member of the con-
spiracy, and show that the defendant’s co-
conspirator committed a tort in New York.
N.Y.McKinney’s CPLR 302(a)(2).

41. Courts © 12(2.20)

To warrant the inference that an out-
of-state defendant was a member of a con-
spiracy, as required for a court to exercise
personal jurisdiction under New York’s
long-arm statute on the basis of the acts of
co-conspirators in New York, plaintiffs
must show that: (1) the defendant had an
awareness of the effects in New York of its
activity; (2) the activity of the co-conspira-
tors in New York was to the benefit of the
out-of-state conspirators; and (8) the co-
conspirators acting in New York acted at
the direction or under the control or at the
request of or on behalf of the out-of-state
defendant. N.Y.McKinney’s CPLR
302(a)(2).

42. Federal Courts 94, 96

Allegations by victims’ survivors, that
various defendants, including Saudi Ara-
bian Princes, conspired with al Qaeda ter-
rorists to perpetrate September 11, 2001
attacks, failed to make prima facie showing
necessary to establish personal jurisdiction
as to Antiterrorism Act (ATA) claims un-
der New York’s long-arm statute, absent
specific facts from which district court
could infer that defendants directed, con-
trolled, or requested al Qaeda to under-
take its terrorist activities, or specific alle-
gations of defendants’ knowledge of or
consent to those activities. 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 2331 et seq.; N.Y.McKinneys CPLR
302(a)(2).

43. Constitutional Law 305)

Federal Courts €76.5

For jurisdiction to exist under the
rule establishing personal jurisdiction in
any district court for cases arising under

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017836
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012375.txt,"9, Section 110

The Department opposes the statutory language in subsection 1 10(a)(1)(B) that
specifically mentions the U.S. Government sponsored hotlines for reporting instances of-
trafficking in persons. Statutorily providing for the names of the hotlincs would interfcre with
the President’s policy-making authority to change the hotline structure at a later date.
Furthermore, the Act, as written, misnames the hotlines.

10. Section 201

In section 201, the Department objects to the new subsection “(bb).” To the extent that
such a subsection is necessary, a question that we defer to the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), the decision regarding cooperation should include the Attomey General in addition to the
Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, as it does in Section 201(b).

DOJ defers to DHS in regard to subsection (a)(1)(E), although we would note that by
removing the “unusual and severe harm” standard, victims will be eligible for a T-visa upon a
lower showing of “extreme hardship.”

The Department also defers to DHS in regard to subsection (a)(2), which would extend
T-visas to parents and siblings of trafficking victims. As a factual matter, however, the provision
should be amended to strike any reference to “as a result of the alien’s cooperation with law
enforcement.” Traffickers threaten victims to intimidate them into compliance with traffickers’
demands and to retaliate for victims’ escape, not because of law enforcement cooperation. It is
counter-factual to describe the pattern of threats and retaliation as linked to law enforcement
cooperation, and disregards the fact that threats often only subside when law enforcement takes
measures to secure the family or punish the traffickers and their associates who threaten victims’
families, Furthermore, it is unclear whether the reference to siblings encompasses both minor
and adult siblings, and whether spouses and children of adult siblings would be eligible for a T-
visa, :

In subsection (b), DOJ opposes the new subsection (8)(B), which grants sole authority to
the Secretary of DHS to consider whether “extreme hardship” exists. The new section, however,
also requires consultation with “prosecutors,” which presumably refers to prosecutors at DOJ,
since DOJ is the lead prosecutorial agency for cases involving human trafficking. Since these
prosecutors are under the Attomey General’s authority, the consultation requirement should
include consultation with the Attorncy General.

Subsection (c)(1), which creates the new subsection (3)(A)(i) in section 107(c) of the
Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), should limit applications for continued presence to
those being made by “Federal” law enforcement officials, Limiting the applications to those
submitted by Federal law enforcement assists in the victim identification process. The
Department has established a memorandum of understanding with DHS that ensures that the
Department’s prosecutors are informed when investigators apply for continued presence.
Furthermore, limiting the applications to those submitted by Federal law enforcement ensures the
uniformity of standards in making the determination as to whether an individual is a victim of a

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012375
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024973.txt,"16

States for offering direct dialogue with North Korea while refusing
talks with Iran “without preconditions.”

He goes on to say that Washington does not seem to understand the
actual causes of proliferation, which he writes “were rooted much
deeper, in the extreme economic and social inequalities that prevailed
between North and South . . . and the conflicts and tensions that
continued to fester in specific regions.” Those tensions certainly lead
to proliferation, but “economic and social inequalities” have no
detectable bearing on why Libya, North Korea, Pakistan, India, Iran,
Syria and Israel have pursued nuclear programs.

ElBaradei passionately advocates making diplomacy the main
recourse in counterproliferation — and he’s right to do so. But when
he argues that “the increasing distrust between different cultures”
form the barrier to “an enduring and collective security” he’s on
shaky ground.

His credo is diplomacy above all else, for however long it takes and
whatever the risk that nuclear weapons will be built in the meantime.
He exhibits more sympathy for non-Western proliferators and their
needs than for the major powers and their security and political
concerns. At times, his narrative comes close to condoning the
motives of states that seek nuclear weapons. “Iran’s goal is not to
become another North Korea — a nuclear weapons possessor but a
pariah in the international community — but rather Brazil or Japan, a
technological powerhouse with the capacity to develop nuclear
weapons if the political winds were to shift, while remaining a
nonnuclear weapons state,” he writes. As for Iran’s concealing its
nuclear program at Natanz, he says Iran “was not intending to ‘hide’
it per se.”

And he adds his voice to those who contend that the fight against
proliferation can’t succeed unless the established nuclear powers
(above all, America and Russia) reduce their stockpiles and move

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024973
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024088.txt,"stock annually on a “mark-to-market” basis so that the Fund may treat any resulting gain or
loss as ordinary income or loss to avoid the PFIC tax.

As noted above, the PFIC rules (including the rules pertaining to QEF elections) generally
should not affect tax-exempt U.S. Partners.

The Fund cannot predict with any certainty at this time whether any non-U.S. portfolio
company in which the Fund invests may be subject to the PFIC regime, whether a timely QEF
election can or will be made, or the effect or availability of any applicable elections made by the
Fund. The rules applicable to PFICs are complex, and the foregoing summary of U.S. federal
income taxation of U.S. Partners indirectly owning an interest in a PFIC is general in nature. It
is possible that U.S. Partners may be subject to tax currently under the PFIC regime on their
proportionate shares of certain earnings of a non-U.S. corporation in which the Fund holds an
interest and/or may incur nondeductible interest-like charges on tax liability deferred under the
PFIC regime without receiving from the Fund distributions sufficient to satisfy any such
obligations.

In addition to the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. person that is a shareholder of a PFIC may
be required to file an annual information report and/or applicable tax forms with the IRS.

Controlled Foreign Corporations - Under Sections 951 through 957 of the Code, special rules
apply to U.S. persons who own, directly or indirectly and applying certain attribution rules,
10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of a non-U.S. corporation
(each, a “United States Shareholder”) that is a “controlled foreign corporation” (“CFC”). For
this purpose, the Fund will be treated as a United States Shareholder of any foreign corporation
in which the Fund’s share ownership reaches this 10% threshold. A non-U.S. corporation
generally will be a CFC for a taxable year if United States Shareholders collectively own more
than 50% of the total combined voting power or total value of the corporation’s stock on any
day during such taxable year. United States Shareholders of a CFC generally must include in
their gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes their pro rata shares of certain earnings
and profits of the CFC. Further, under Section 1248 of the Code, if a U.S. person sells or
exchanges stock of a non-U.S. corporation and that person is or was a United States Shareholder
at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of such sale or exchange during
which that non-U.S. corporation was a CFC, that U.S. person generally will be required to treat
a portion of the gain recognized upon such sale or exchange as a dividend to the extent of the
earnings and profits of the CFC attributable to such stock. Under U.S. federal income tax rules,
the Fund itself is a U.S. person and, if the Fund becomes a United States Shareholder of a CFC,
taxable U.S. Partners (i) will be required to report and pay tax currently on their shares of the
CFC’s earnings and profits attributable to the Fund that are taxable to its United States
Shareholders under the CFC rules, and (ii) will be subject to the Section 1248 recharacterization
rule described above. In addition, if the Fund is a United States Shareholder of a CFC and a
U.S. Partner disposes of its Limited Partner Interest, that Partner generally will recognize
income under Section 751 of the Code equal to its distributive share of the Section 1248 income
that would have been triggered if the Fund had sold its interest in the CFC at fair market value.
The maximum rate of tax imposed on certain dividend income and certain long-term capital
gains attributable to dispositions of securities generally is 20%, so that a recharacterization of
gain under Section 1248 might not increase that U.S. Partner’s U.S. federal income tax liability.
In addition, income of a CFC subject to income tax in a country other than the U.S. at an

77 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024088
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022839.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 1/16/2015 7:52:31 PM 
To: Thomas Jr., Landon 
Subject: Re: How are you holding up? 
Importance: High 
it is the begining world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc 
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Thomas Jr., Landon < > wrote: 
I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help 
in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are 
able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex 
with •And Mworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know 
that and cant accept that unless you say as much. 
Does franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now... 
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can 
handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former 
girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpeonaed. her name 
never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire 
time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane 
many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that claims. She can 
confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane 
doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left 
message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my 
story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were 
together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows 
no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl 
acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while 
they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex ). . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone 
say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served 
coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60. 
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Thomas Jr., Landon < wrote: 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/inde  
x.html  
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022839 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.  
html  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022840 
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027833.txt,"Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: E2B27061-7952-4FE8-BEA8-FBO3ED6336CD

Message: Noam in no shape to film---clearly in some sort of pain and has grown a beard-
-- @ 90 we need to get him scheduled soon as practicable

Time: 06/29/19 07:53:06 PM (583555986)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: D48FEEOA-3A52-4D00-BF77-46A423EB4419
Message: He spent 3 hours crushing me
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/29/19 10:59:10 PM (583567150)
Flags: 1085445
Ts Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 9571141E-642D-4926-8756-88CO1LICIAE8F
Message: Shame . For both of you
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/30/19 04:17:35 AM (583586255)
Flags: 1150981
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: B92A1D87-5BCA-48 94-8853-EDBEDO0DB3564

Message: I will land ny sund. Fly to island tues afternoon. Then back to Paris
following tush's

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/30/19 04:17:37 AM (583586257)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7FCC19CO-D29D-4E60-84B2-4A5BD5BBD3AF

Message: tues

Sender: PS
Time: 06/30/19 04:47:24 AM (583588044)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027833
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012722.txt,"﻿From: ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net
To: jeeproject@yahoo.com; 
Subject: ASW Travel Deals: Sky Dive Mount Everest, See New York's Newest, Do Paris's Chicest
Sent: 8/3/2011 2:11:03 PM

 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_trans.gif> 	  
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/open.aspx?ffcb10-ff3617707166-fe9e11757567067f75-fe9a15707666047b7c-ffcc17-fe9117727c60077c7d-ff5e17767d> If you are unable to see this message, click here to view. <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc263a834cf9e945aa4d538c77faee7e9a6eb69959eb89db721682aa868bb74a40e0>  To ensure delivery to your inbox, add ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net <mailto:ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net>  to your address book. 
 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_trans.gif> 	
 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc26ca27aa5e0f6c483a2975d166ae2aa100747db46bc90cc94cc911d834590623ca>  
 

Taking the Plunge

 

Wednesday, August 03, 2011

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc26ca27aa5e0f6c483a2975d166ae2aa100747db46bc90cc94cc911d834590623ca> 	 	
	 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc26ca27aa5e0f6c483a2975d166ae2aa100747db46bc90cc94cc911d834590623ca>  
 



""New and noteworthy"" is a term that gets tossed around a lot in the travel world, but we're taking it seriously to heart this week at Jetsetter. The ""new"" is the Dream Downtown NYC, a hip, reinvented space at the crossroads of Chelsea and the Meatpacking District (MePa, if you really must). The ""noteworthy"" is a little thing called skydiving at Mount Everest. Whether it's lounging poolside in New York or jumping out of a plane in full view of the world's highest mountain, there's a lot going on this week. Read on for all the details, including properties in Paris, San Francisco, Vegas, Miami and more. (Image: Skydive Mount Everest - on sale Sat, Aug 6.) 

 
	
	 
 
	
	
Hip Manhattan Newcomer... with Real Sand

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Dream Downtown - NYC

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc26669f0079f97f4b05246b2e0bd645fcdcbb33823945d94c9dbc460605a6f14795>  
 
	
	The new Dream Downtown has the best of both worlds. Housed in a 1960s building designed by Albert C. Ledner, it's situated at the crux of Manhattan's art, design and nightlife scenes between Chelsea and the Meatpacking District. With a hot rooftop bar, a Miami-meets-Ibiza pool (with lounge chairs set in real sand) and modern rooms with classic Downtown views, you can have your party and a good night's sleep, too. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc2660e0a8583339a2d82e40c041cff1bda9b7e6372fd5bad85465c946022fc4cd0a>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed3138a30f0cacf52fbf0d1d5675e6461edb6e160b95676b5c9f5b2e5908a0706189>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Romance by the Arc de Triomphe

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Mon Hotel - Paris

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed3158e427404c99b10635d18fd87351d3be9f6540ad8a7d661c65871c8e749b24b9>  
 
	
	Just a short walk from the Arc de Triomphe, Mon Hotel sits on a quiet street off the bustling boulevards. Designer Aurélia Santoni fashioned this intimate boutique property with eccentricity and flair; lampshades from Dutch design firm Moooi hang above Utrecht armchairs in the lobby. Above all, the style of the guestrooms and the service stress comfort; Mon feels like your personal Paris pied-à-terre. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed31f8b1671f0bea340f428279907c802a966a97830ef4231851eca507698eedcd1a>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed31ab1fa563a68f4d29e841d3f7279f63feb4b41684c18fddb9c1def579b830dc6f>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Beach, Spa, Repeat in Crete

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Candia Maris Resort - Crete

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed31edd6446313b060a6b8d2dbf46784f7aaa1e7b52e1d750b3e2a62ac69067bc49d>  
 
	
	Just outside Heraklion, Crete's capital city, the Candia Maris is a sprawling beachside resort spanning nearly 10 acres. Although the property lacks the charm of smaller hotels, it more than compensates with its amenities, which include tennis courts and seven pools. The highlight is the vast thalassotherapy spa, which underwent a multimillion-dollar renovation in 2008. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed31f88f793cf3eee32ee40f1abbbd7aa5f93563ae4412b751331f4d65b766de4037>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed315d7376fc1b482650fe9362aea73f51c95ea3004322a0099fc05fbf794fede663>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Sleep in a Palace in Portugal

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Vidago Palace - Portugal

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed317bb1661e898999132dc6c91a62629fb143811dadf2a921df7c40e3bf24845e5a>  
 
	
	In the mountainous north of the country, just over an hour from Porto, the recently opened Vidago Palace has, in one fell swoop, raised the bar for luxury getaways in Portugal. As far removed from the sun and sand of the touristy Algarve as you can get, this is a destination for the discerning traveler and the lover of fine things, whether they be cigars, hand-painted silk wallpaper, the country's best spa or a championship golf course. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed316859db79c18068ffbc9c4a9eb5bc60cf336e741d3001c0b6f36c8fe276c8a332>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=21a04b983bc3ed31863af0dbd7dade327e870df1687c72677aaf7f43e18b0690412abfefb76c7149>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
The Budapest Bauhaus

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Mamaison Hotel Budapest

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c1bc41abfbd9ac93fece3a90d843befeac92ecf65e93e705e708e538c05b28225c>  
 
	
	Leisure and business travelers feel like locals at this historic boutique hotel set among the embassies and grand residences of Budapest's tree-lined Andrassy Avenue. Built in 1937 and completely renovated three years ago, the hotel is home to a hip-again Bauhaus style in the comfortable rooms and gourmet dining at on-site Baraka Restaurant. For exploring, you can't beat the location: It's a short walk to restaurants, parks, museums and the city's famed thermal baths. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c19aa6aaf26dca5730355ed7ecc162d1883049202548cb11deac7cf02aeb6ddab2>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c10da0272e19c3bd336d161f89271c9f6b225f5df78f45e026e94dafaeeec971fa>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
A Study in Swiss Chic

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Cervo - Switzerland

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c1af259bf6a9171a6fdc4b1536489462a4ae4a8d71d00b76da81708f6880192587>  
 
	
	The Cervo may have a Swiss address, but there's nothing neutral about this boutique hotel's atmosphere and hospitality. In Zermatt, a legendary ski village where the Matterhorn (""Horu"" to locals) dominates the landscape (and the activities, yearround) the hotel has the requisite majestic views. But modern interiors and quirky accents like antlers and cheerful checkerboard patterns make the Cervo a study in Swiss chic. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c1dc0173ec3d4b738801c26fa94a0f649c8a621311feea6556efe950e24dc63776>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c1cb3f7f4b1b37b86baceade841bac24c9d14b7e011b2f047ed3485736582ac14d>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Living the Fantasy in Las Vegas

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

The Palms - Las Vegas

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c1a3c515dcb29ea3954a2bb90c99e09077f325b236dacfa32f570ea39ca6b2b734>  
 
	
	The Palms Las Vegas is all about classic hedonism: nightlife, gambling, pool parties and sweet guestrooms for more after-hours fun. Within the Palms enclave, the Palms Fantasy Tower flaunts a cool, contemporary feel to suit the tastes of its young and stylish party-hard crowds, perfect for hosting the true ""what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas"" experience. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c1d2a3a5f82ff4fada3f243777c2d007cfa55bee4293a0999360d9f8613c0df7e1>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c19f8fbcbceddfcdf406ad304c8150fe733b7b5d0b0cd8f81a5693d0310ac03620>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
A Classic San Francisco Stay

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Omni San Francisco Hotel

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=253accf39d4210c1786cd5499f6303d3e64d572ebcfd63e7afa46c21593a8c4476c48da00a4f71cc>  
 
	
	In a beautifully renovated redbrick-and-stone former bank building, the Omni San Francisco has an elegant ambiance and draws inspiration from Renaissance Florence. The spacious rooms have carved-mahogany furniture and nine-foot-high crown molded ceilings, while sparkling crystal chandeliers, mahogany paneling and an iron-and-marble staircase define the lobby. Best of all, it's within walking distance from some of the city's top attractions like Union Square, North Beach and Chinatown. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626f404ab928dcdcb321e1c5ad976a54da48cdc9ec82dce68a68fe16b0f28df5afed>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626fd2d61024dd825cef17dacb207cf697e277da2350aa0e3a14e8a54d26d34df7ca>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Hilltop Romance on Phuket

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

The Pavilions - Phuket

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626f351539684d4fe16aebd9646f3959c5a38168a0af3a1b9d4486ff4ef75397cd38>  
 
	
	These hilltop retreats are some of Phuket's most romantic crash pads thanks to sublime panoramic Andaman Sea views and the island's most discreet staff. All villas include swimmable pools and roomy decks for sun and shade. The 360 bar attracts the island's best dressed inhabitants who flock here at sundown for the calm view then stay sipping colorful cocktails late into the warm night. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626f7645047d6a52b661e16a94cf901b24574717788eaffc77c840ecdec2eb5bf500>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626fcb7bfb1afdcbf1ef0d180531669a808467ef57012153908d02c5223efdaca6c2>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Beachfront Zen Near Cancun

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

La Amada Hotel - Playa Mujeres

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626f8efc34a476f91610f6a73d15d770986893ace9f20b542c543369658e04a600c3>  
 
	
	Looking more like some millionaire's Miami crib than a traditional Cancún resort, the all white, Zen-minimalist La Amada Hotel exudes a down-to-earth sexiness and an understated elegance - all creamy sofas, gauzy curtains and personal Jacuzzis. Just 20 minutes north of central Cancún in Playa Mujeres, La Amada is on a long, pristine and very secluded beach. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626f435bd5b16fefdbf985c0a4c0cfdefb849b2f0fe5f7ca38bce7704d8791c270d5>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626fddba0cadf315ce106da7eb521542811cb4f5eeb4a6f0b124b0a4d6bee060ec48>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Stately Style in the Heart of Washington D.C.

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

The Madison - D.C.

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626f93944ebb515ea43927977f4221a838085f117622ee1e19dd6688ff060481339e>  
 
	
	Named for James Madison, the fourth president and ""father of the Constitution,"" this stately hotel has traditional style and refined service - plus, a location that puts many of Washington's must-see museums and monuments along the Mall within walking distance. Opened in 1963, the 353-room hotel has hosted the Dalai Lama, the occasional celebrity and every U.S. president since John F. Kennedy except Barack Obama. But don't worry - you can stop by the White House, which is just five blocks away. 
 

Click here to visit sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=5a3e483b5a4e626f45c9cb58edf588d757d26a8c31617b4cbe23bb428cd18ae62d1f1312c547c1bc>   	 
Now Live

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f464c5bec4b9294f03b87d3fae5e99ba6630dea9ef5fe80da54abd105c2c1ad6ac0a>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Where Esther Williams Meets Chanel

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

The Raleigh - South Beach

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f4645c444d6bbf219d77fa5b218fc425957b34f89718a9d64ae9c622c25a3ca3018c>  
 
	
	The Raleigh is different from most properties in South Beach, with a vibe that's more Deco cool than decked out to the nines. A stay here feels a bit like a trip to the 1940s - dressed in whites one minute, casual the next. It's all about lounging in style by the pool, which has hosted everything from Esther Williams swimming routines to Chanel's cruise collection show. The Raleigh itself is a lot like that pool: cool, pretty and a place to be seen. 
 

Click here to preview sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f4640d2dea9120d831b0747af6ca32d28ee5ad8f7d3ef2b059d31eb0711c5db65262>   	 
Starting Thursday 4/8 at 8pm BST

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f464eefcb78c801d0818727c3aa5fdd0e9c700c9b28bb88271572794e663d5aeb823>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
The Classic SoCal Beach Escape

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Shorebreak - California

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f4648b66b1f15c9b7ff21facacdc1f63c7a56f4369556f0881c0da0fb463629f0860>  
 
	
	Shorebreak, a 157-room hotel on Huntington Beach, lives up to the SoCal lifestyle celebrated on breezy beach postcards. From your private balcony, you'll gaze over a classic California coast pier, with the Pacific stretching out behind it. Surf by day, then chow down on room-service orecchiette pasta with seared diver scallops before heading out to a beachside bonfire. 
 

Click here to preview sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f4649f6b247461bd7c75ed6a8d5fad2c244dc04d710fa3b6fd4135f10aa925db3e95>   	 
Starting Thursday 4/8 at 8pm BST

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f4641063ad9ce811da2aeb827e54e9f306fbff8d244d33de2beba23846611ab0ae2d>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
Attention Adrenaline Junkies

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Skydive Mount Everest

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f4645d6c5144a147bd03a6c49f993dbd6e86f214bc75736faef2ffbabdd5e3d65e9a>  
 
	
	As any adrenaline junkie knows, skydiving is the ultimate thrill: Those few seconds during free fall are as close to flying as we humans will probably ever get. Now imagine hurling yourself out of a plane at 29,500 feet - in full view of Mount Everest. To call it a rush would be an understatement, but tour company Everest Skydive makes this once-in-a-lifetime experience possible. During this 10-night/11-day tour, beginning in Kathmandu, you'll get your bearings on the ground with some sightseeing and then hike up to the drop site, where the true adventure begins. And with all the details - accommodations, gear, professional instruction - taken care of, skydivers can simply enjoy the (truly unforgettable) moment. 
 

Click here to preview sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f464be574bfc6184d6948533ab1b2ab652108ca8d24b1b65ef9f2819afc7c414a027>   	 
Starting Saturday 6/8 at 5pm BST

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=a45f50288fa2f464d157f79010fac8245f0fa0849628e9622d15e3669852e7efef62a6ebfefcd8b8>  
 
	
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	
The South African Safari Goes Posh

 
 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 

Morukuru - South Africa

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bde2cec0f69c3d362f5c6816840ced83130fad889207b3653876f2ed19094c9d13b>  
 
	
	In the heart of the Madikwe Game Reserve, Morukuru Family's trio of boutique-chic, exclusive lodging options are the perfect pick for small groups seeking an intimate, totally tailor-made bush adventure. Half wild, half unabashedly posh, the getaway is less than a four-hour drive - or an even shorter charter plane ride - from Johannesburg. Choose between the Owners House, the Lodge or the Farm, and the the only people you'll share sundowners and lion cub photos ops with will be the pack you arrived with. Family-friendly and super flexible, this is a true South African safari vacation, complete with personal cooks, butlers and animal trackers at your service. 
 

Click here to preview sale <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bde99e6955cbdb470af6ae666253bedb3d35d55eadd32ce06d2d2fb369e19410a54>   	 
Starting Saturday 6/8 at 5pm BST

 
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bde8194dfafaf2c13edc97148fd94f7c8fb37a5471b045f29a1e2bfffd93361de54>  
 
	
			
	 <http://cdn.jetsetter.com/static/templates/mktg/10px_lt-gray-pixel.gif> 
 
	
	 

Sales this week

 

Starting Today at 8pm BST

Mamaison Hotel Budapest <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bde033f2e63dd4387648bbff1f7e625e2a4f18c0cd4ef00344c76b7b613d9eacee3> 
Sofitel Montreal Golden Mile <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bde6d4bdafbe96a3410c16bcc691117341f111e0c15570272d84ec22df5d992567f> 
Cervo - Switzerland <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bde85c979c4f03c50486f3b426940bbf6e3a84d23071b5039a1fc710f1ab1b2a0e7> 

Starting Thursday at 8pm BST

The Shores - Daytona Beach <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bde4d982861ec03fb54320b1ed28ab6d617f493316ae9ca48068a42a24c1b3ecc52> 
The Raleigh - South Beach <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bdee3fe2ee8b818e32105b6307cca05760d204bf4ba568b4e8983ebc214bffe65f5> 
Shorebreak - California <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bdea824ed6dbfb84fc3e74eec2295c9c69d517230c496416ffe91a4fa8742ce2f60> 

Starting Friday at 5pm BST

Veranda House - Nantucket <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=c53ef1c444ca5bded929246a16e4ca4acaa5c936c4146d911c2b4779760af131787e4fc3286177cd> 

	 
	

Starting Friday at 8pm BST

Iron Horse Hotel - Milwaukee <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de96c9f84ae45deed9448f145436febd6f56c7bfbef8d05d86dfe26e78c9fff436d5> 
Hidden Pond - Maine <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de96c4e721dfeccc43a8e756f6171e562b36569d2f6756c8c50b18d1d2bd6599c9c5> 
Kedron Valley Inn - Vermont <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de969f9489bb363e8c30f9e9619bd631f56215b3ab3f6755872c76fd9a41d6d85829> 

Starting Saturday at 5pm BST

A Culinary Retreat in Mexico <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de961d6910d0351621d06d9f0f162a58b67a3717ae3f817fc1095e6dbd41178845dc> 
Morukuru - South Africa <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de96c9c64c55ecc666e813ee274200ab3e10e4d4521a2004eb275c78763d01529f6b> 
Skydive Mount Everest <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de96cbf04b8932a1db9a69e588217d21566f4d928f2a34cfa4b7fb1cb8421e0f3d01> 

Starting Sunday at 5pm BST

The Alexandra - Turks & Caicos <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de968d6bb0ee96331d5982f5a844cd136b300bf7780943276e46ae3cb404d3215e19> 

	 
	

Starting Sunday at 8pm BST

Las Alamandas - Mexico <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de966eb9e98b0622500c8605e131b5bade1f24ec6823e4070db8c6b601def89f54c2> 
Arenas del Mar Beachfront <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de968fae665f36e3e2750a3170de02d5c3d616298ac31eb64c7fe396499ea1351aa2> 
Blue Waters - Antigua <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=dfc9cda88665de9641e4ee501578bb5d5d13115552714a062ec502ffec52cb08b13959b8e93de0bb> 
Nayara Hotel, Spa & Gardens <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=aacd9f741a61650ab71459c4b4bc25c2eb48f9ee7e9a789884be2a478beaf7ab5ee36a3d88226600> 

Starting Monday at 8pm BST

Hotel Matilda - San Miguel <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=aacd9f741a61650ab541cd0ecfea08a384ae0068d3ef207040473f2fb0b84514eaa97116ff4e4dff> 
Santa Teresa - Rio De Janeiro <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=aacd9f741a61650a82f3067333fb5b4f686d004e412b8a1b776282abf29cab1896355740e14527e7> 

 
	
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc26ca27aa5e0f6c483a2975d166ae2aa100747db46bc90cc94cc911d834590623ca> 	 
	
To make sure this goes to your inbox, just add ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net <mailto:ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net>  to your address book.
Contact us at travel@asmallworld.net <mailto:travel@asmallworld.net> , on Twitter at @AskJetsetter <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=aacd9f741a61650aaffe884f32750dbf9e5fc8af946aa94ccb82b4d8f5433842dacfe4d174006ea1> , or call us at 877-JSET-USA/877-573-8872.
Jetsetter, 40 W 20th Street Floor 7, New York, NY, 10011
To unsubscribe from ASW Travel Deals email advertisements, please click here <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=aacd9f741a61650a961a1b7dc915de6b6fac627f858f93a1d45177d78d4f1755569d0f231526428e> . 

	
 <http://click.mail.jetsetter.com/?qs=b729e29fef3ecc26ca27aa5e0f6c483a2975d166ae2aa100747db46bc90cc94cc911d834590623ca> 	 	
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017822.txt,"Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 5 of6

Dershowitz, in interviews with the Herald, and in recent public statements, said he has never
met Ransome. He also said she initially tried to interest the New York Post in her story, but a
reporter whom he said he spoke with told him Ransome was not credible. He said he has a trove
of emails between Ransome and the reporter that prove she is a “lunatic.”

“There are hundreds of emails in which she claimed to have sex with everybody in the world and
also claimed she has video of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and others having sex
with underage girls — but she never ever accused me in these emails,” Dershowitz said.

The emails are under seal, he said, and therefore cannot be made public. Dershowitz said he has
asked the court to unseal them but his efforts thus far have been unsuccessful.

In the recent court transcript, however, it is Maxwell’s attorney, Laura Menninger — not
Ransome or her attorneys — who named Dershowitz.

“[Ransome] has alleged not only that my client [Maxwell] ran a sex trafficking organization but
she claims also that she was directed by my client and the Epstein defendants to have sex with
third parties, including Alan Dershowitz, for example,” Menninger said. “And so to the extent
my client or Mr. Dershowitz or anyone else is going to be asked about their private sexual
activity, I believe that would implicate their privacy rights...”

Roberts, who now lives in Australia, said that Epstein ordered her to have sex with Dershowitz
six times, according to a 2015 affidavit, which was filed in connection with an unrelated Epstein
federal lawsuit.

At that time, Dershowitz launched a media blitz on TV asserting that Roberts made up the story.
He also called for Roberts’ lawyers — Edwards and University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell
— to be disbarred. The lawyers sued Dershowitz for defamation, and the case was settled last
year.

Dershowitz publicly declared he was vindicated after a federal judge ordered Roberts’ affidavit
stricken from the court record. But the judge did not address the veracity of her sexual
misconduct claims; he instead ruled that the affidavit was misplaced in a case not involving
Dershowitz.

Boies, whose firm represented Roberts pro bono, addressed Dershowitz’s longstanding
contention that he had been exonerated.

“Anytime in a lawsuit where you were the defendant and you paid the plaintiff $900,000 to
settle it — that’s a strange kind of vindication,” Boies said, asserting that Dershowitz paid that
amount as part of the defamation settlement with Edwards and Cassell.

In 2016, Dershowitz released a statement following what he said was “an independent
investigation” that had been conducted by former FBI Director Louis Freeh, who is now a
private consultant.

“Our investigation found no evidence to support the accusations of sexual misconduct against
Professor Dershowitz. In fact, in several instances, the evidence directly contradicted the
accusations made against him,” Freeh wrote.

Most of the court records in the Roberts case are sealed. In February, the Miami Herald filed a
motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking access to documents. The motion, which

was not opposed by Roberts, could shed more light on the full scope of Epstein’s crimes and
who was involved.

https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017822
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031533.txt,"Explosion

Move-in day was complete, Welcome Week had gone swimmingly, and the new academic year — 2015-
16-- loomed just ahead, filled with promise. Then came the explosion. A closely-watched rape trial was
underway at the McLennan County courthouse, a magnificent structure symbolizing the community-
unifying goal of justice. Justice for all. Sam Ukwuachu, a super-talented defensive end on Baylor’s
football team who had transferred from football powerhouse Boise State, was in the dock, charged with
an egregious offense against basic human dignity. Sam’s rape trial launched a crisis. Suddenly, for all the
wrong reasons, Baylor football was thrust into the national limelight.

Explosion |

Triggering the unexpected explosion was a provocative on-line piece by the wildly popular home-grown
periodical, Texas Monthly. Based in Austin, and unremittingly progressive in tone, TM published a
harshly-critical on-line piece just as pre-season was drawing to a close. The muck-raking on-line attack
claimed that, in effect, a rape culture had grown up in the fabulously successful football program under
the turbo-charged leadership of Coach Art Briles. This was the first anyone around the Executive Council
roundtable had heard anything of the sort.

A terrible pall fell over the conference room in Pat Neff 100. Just hours before, we had all been exulting
in the excitement of a new year. Football was an integral part of what would soon unfold that autumn.
After all, in a few short years, Coach Briles had built a national powerhouse on the banks of the Brazos.
And his dream (described in Chapter 1) of an on-campus stadium had come true. The House that RG III
built was, in fact, the House that Art Briles and Drayton McLaneean, Jr. built. Coach Briles was the
inspiration, and Drayton — the dreamer of great dreams — was the driving force.

Coach and Drayton were joined by a cracker-jack in-house Development team, augmented by members
of the Board of Regents, especially former Regent Chair Dary Stone. The staff and Regent volunteers
poured themselves into the unprecedented fundraising effort. They had triumphed. And Year One at
McLaneean had gone beautifully, marred only by injuries to two key quarterbacks. Even then, the 2014
season had ended with a record-shattering offensive display in Orlando as the Baylor Bears
overwhelmed the Tar Heels of North Carolina with a high-speed “Wildcat” offense (no quarterback).

For his part, Coach Briles had quickly built an eye-popping football program that matched the stunningly
impressive stadium, which in short order became a gathering place for the broader community, not just
the Baylor family. Indeed, at Coach Briles’ urging, the very first game played at McLaneean Stadium was
not a Baylor Bears high-octane display of razzle-dazzle offense, but a high-school match-up straight out

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031533
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010562.txt,"Scott Link
June 19, 2019
Page 3

fF confided to him that she had never even had a boyfriend. He told her
everything would fall into place, “just keep doing what you are doing, work hard and stay
focused.” She told Mr. Epstein that she preferred to abstain from sex until she was married.

The first time HE asked her for a massage was to help with an ache in his
shoulder. I thought it was an innocent request. He said his masseuse had failed to
get a kink out of his shoulder. He gave her a large purple massager for her to use to take the knot
out of his back. Mr. Epstein told her she was an excellent masseuse and she was pleased to be
able to ease his pain.

When the massage ended, Mr. Epstein pulled two hundred dollars from his wallet and
handed it to her. He said, “I was going to give it to the masseuse anyway, so you take it and pay
for your car service or something.”

Mr. Epstein began calling her every day, no matter where she was in the world. He told
her he loved her. He became a vital part of a as her parents remained
distant. He invited her to stay at one of his apartments close to him on the Upper East Side. Her
arduous work schedule, starting with 6:00 a.m. call times and shows running late into the night
were exhausting. Epstein’s daily check-up calls and pep talks gave her strength to survive her
grinding schedule.

When in Paris, Mr. Epstein allowed her to stay at his home with her sister and arranged
for a night out at a concert with Naomi Campbell. It appeared to a ih: Mr. Epstein’s
thoughts were focused on her career, future and good fortune.

The first time the purple massage tool found its way between her legs, a 01d
him to stop, but Mr. Epstein pushed the head of the massager firmly against her and forced her
legs apart. She felt ashamed and embarrassed. The massages became a ritual and were always
accompanied with sexual abuse and a two-hundred dollar payment at the end.

Mr. Epstein approached her as if he was her mentor and teacher, teaching her about
sexuality, opening her eyes. She experienced immense orgasms, and then shame and fear. She
felt claustrophobia as she stared up into Mr. Epstein’s church-like ceiling of the massage parlor
while he fondled her. She felt she couldn’t escape her position, and that this was the way it had
to be because this powerful man orchestrated it. At the end of each massage he would make
himself ejaculate by demanding she pay vigorous attention to his nipples with her fingers and he
would tell her what a good girl she was, that he loved her and would call her later, which made
everything seem better. Then he would open his wallet filled with hundred dollar bills and give
her a couple, which she accepted as pocket money, never thinking twice about it.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010562
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029735.txt,"traditional approach vis-a-vis my
country.”

But if Washington remains committed to
ever-tougher sanctions — and without
promising Iran that sanctions will be
lifted as part of a deal — then negotiations
are unlikely to succeed. Vali Nasr,
another former Obama administration
official with expertise on Iran, suggested
recently that there's not much more the
world can do to sanction Iran, and that
such penalties could drive Tehran to take
radical action. The regime of sanctions
against Iran over its nuclear activity
""really has reached its end,"" Nasr, dean of
the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced
International Studies at Johns Hopkins
University, said during the World
Economic Forum in Davos. And he
warned that unless there is a diplomatic
breakthrough — or, alternatively, an
attack on Iran — ""you really are looking
at a scenario where Iran is going to rush
very quickly towards nuclear power,
because they also think, like North
Korea, that (then) you have much more
leverage to get rid of these sanctions.”

Robert Dreyfuss is an independent,
investigative journalist in the
Washington, D.C, area, who writes
frequently for The Nation, Rolling Stone,
and other publications. His blog, The

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029735
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030264.txt,"impeachment is an unconstitutional trampling on the separation of
powers.

As the President, by nature and design, tries to claim aggressive new
powers, the Mueller team, almost in equal proportion, is trying to limit
the theory of Presidential power and, even, to criminalize an expansive
exercise of those powers.

People who know and have worked with Mueller find it, at best,
unexpected that this traditional by the book G-man would be pursuing
such far-reaching legal theories. But one possible explanation, shared by
many in the White House, is that Mueller is overly reliant on his staff—
in face, is being led by his number two, Andrew Weissmann.

Weismann has a longstanding reputation for aggression: he was
the prosecutor whose pursuit of the accounting firm Arthur Anderson in
the Enron debacle ended in its conviction—a judgment reversed well
after the firm's bankruptcy and dissolution. One White House advisor
likened him to Victor Hugo's obsessed policeman Inspector Javert—a
prosecutor consumed with taking down the President. Indeed,
Weissmann, who has in the past contributed to Democratic candidates,
is a particular bet noir and favorite whipping boy for the White House
his central role in the Mueller investigation taken there as evidence of a
deep bias against Donald Trump.

But in another view it is precisely because Mueller, a former
Marine, is so by the book and Semper Fi that he finds Trump's behavior
to be personally offensive, and, on its face, corrupt. ""Bob Mueller is all
about limits and rules. Donald Trump has none and acknowledges
none,"" said one lawyer who has worked with Mueller in the past.

It may yet be even a more profound clash then that, the executive
branch at war with itself—the Justice Department against the White
House. In this, the President's almost daily tirades against the DOJ, the
Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, the Deputy Attorney General,
Rosenstein, the former head of the FBI, Comey, and his deputy, Andrew
McCabe, are part of an effort to obstruct justice and save himself.

The Mueller strategy (or Weissmann strategy) is a war strategy, in
the view of some legal observers. An indictment of the President would
be litigated to the hilt. It would force both the substantive issues of
obstruction and abuse of power and the meta issues of Presidential
immunity—in essence, the President's claims to being above the law—
into open court for a long and painful review and dissection that might

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030264
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033554.txt,"﻿From: editorialstaff@flipboard.com
To: jeevacation@gmail.com; 
Subject: The 75th anniversary of D-Day
Sent: 6/6/2019 7:21:29 PM

 <https://ue.flipboard.com/usage?data=%7B%22event_action%22%3A%22open%22%2C%22properties%22%3A%7B%22lang%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22uid%22%3A3646186%2C%22unique_id%22%3A3646186%2C%22time%22%3A1559848824000%7D%2C%22prod_type%22%3A%22notification%22%2C%22event_category%22%3A%22email%22%2C%22event_data%22%3A%7B%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Femail%2Fassets%2Fclear.gif%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22photodesk.us.20190606.clone%22%2C%22target_id%22%3A%22%22%2C%22redirect_url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Femail%2Fassets%2Fclear.gif%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail%22%7D%7D> 
Plus, Apple unveils new, cool stuff and the top images of the week. | 
	
	 <http://cdn.flipboard.com/email/assets/logo2018-200x200.png> 		
	
		This week from The Photodesk	 	
	
		Honoring the 75th Anniversary of D-Day <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559758026000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559758026000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=7377c108ed568785&china_variant=False> 	 	
	
		 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559758026000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=c3a312b3ed3bcfa6&china_variant=False> 	 	
	
See the full gallery <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559758026000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559758026000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=7377c108ed568785&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False>  
	
	 
	
	
	
		Discover more galleries from The Photodesk	 	
	
	 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559838621000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559838621000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=5b0f9511aca00070&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False> 		
	
		Pictures of the Week 6.6.19 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559838621000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559838621000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=5b0f9511aca00070&china_variant=False> 	 	
	
See the full gallery <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559838621000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559838621000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=5b0f9511aca00070&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False>  
	
	 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559591828000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559591828000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=472e28019a7142c6&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False> 		
	
		Apple Reveals New Products <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559591828000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559591828000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=472e28019a7142c6&china_variant=False> 	 	
	
See the full gallery <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559591828000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559591828000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=472e28019a7142c6&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False>  
	
	 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559675862000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559675862000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=3b88e10c87cedf83&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False> 		
	
		Remembering Tiananmen Square 30 Years Later in Pictures <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559675862000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559675862000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=3b88e10c87cedf83&china_variant=False> 	 	
	
See the full gallery <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559675862000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559675862000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=3b88e10c87cedf83&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False>  
	
	 
	
	
			 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=674699&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	
 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=674700&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=674702&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	
	
			 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=674703&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	
 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=674704&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=674706&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	
	
	
	 
	
	
	
	 
	
	
	 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559594876000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559594876000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=603027ecebc5d42e&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False> 		
	
		Trump Meets the Queen <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559594876000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559594876000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=603027ecebc5d42e&china_variant=False> 	 	
	
See the full gallery <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect/ws?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=flipboard%3A%2F%2FshowSection%2Fresolve%252Fflipboard%252Furl%25252Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fcdn.flipboard.com%252Fcontent%252Fthephotodesk%252Fthephotodeskgalleries%252Fitems%252F1559594876000.html&utm_source=email&web_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.flipboard.com%2Fcontent%2Fthephotodesk%2Fthephotodeskgalleries%2Fitems%2F1559594876000.html%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=603027ecebc5d42e&position=0&part=photo&china_variant=False>  
	
		U.S. troops from Company E, 16th Infantry, 1st Infantry Division disembark from a landing craft of the USS Samuel Chase and wade ashore onto the Fox Green section of Omaha Beach during the Normandy landings, June 6, 1944. Robert F. Sargent/US Coast Guard/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images	 	
	
		 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=700279&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	
 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=700280&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/click?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=700282&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	
	
	
	 
	
	
 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495800&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495801&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495802&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495803&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495804&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495805&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495806&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495807&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495808&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495809&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495810&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495811&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495812&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495813&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495814&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495815&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495816&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495817&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495818&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	 <http://li.flipboard.com/imp?p=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&s=125495819&m=7eb7c906398c2993ffd26c678d61c8c3&li=> 	
		
See your Flipboard on the web <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=&utm_source=email&web_url=https%3A%2F%2Fflipboard.com%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=e9d541d6cec8428d&position=1&part=web&china_variant=False>  
or download the mobile app 	
	
		 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=&utm_source=email&web_url=https%3A%2F%2Fitunes.apple.com%2Fus%2Fapp%2Fflipboard%2Fid358801284&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=6328b71980505540&position=0&part=apps&china_variant=False>  		 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=&utm_source=email&web_url=https%3A%2F%2Fplay.google.com%2Fstore%2Fapps%2Fdetails%3Freferrer%3Dutm_source%253Dfbemailfooter%2526utm_medium%253Demailfooter%2526utm_campaign%253Dinstallfromemailfooter%26id%3Dflipboard.app&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=bf4157caf8ad7c78&position=1&part=apps&china_variant=False>  		 <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=&utm_source=email&web_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fstore%2Fapps%2Fflipboard%2F9wzdncrfj32q&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=688958effb0122e9&position=2&part=apps&china_variant=False>  			
	
You have received this email because you signed up for an account on Flipboard with the email address: jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> . 	
	
Unsubscribe <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=&utm_source=email&web_url=https%3A%2F%2Fflemail.flipboard.com%2Faccount%2FemailSettings%3Flang%3Den%26utm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26code%3DMzY0NjE4NiVqZWV2YWNhdGlvbkBnbWFpbC5jb20lZW4lMTU1OTg0ODgyNDAwMA%253D%253D%26preselect%3D2%26utm_source%3Demail%26s%3DJ6OcbpYl5uSl2DIHiOJFo4X1e9rqaMjQyTU%252F6PPG6%252Bw%253D%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=feae420d0db7b2cd&position=1&part=unsubscribe&china_variant=False>     |    Privacy Policy <https://flemail.flipboard.com/redirect?lang=en&utm_campaign=photodesk&uid=3646186&section_url=&utm_source=email&web_url=https%3A%2F%2Fflipboard.com%2Fprivacy%3Futm_campaign%3Dphotodesk%26utm_medium%3Dphotodesk.us.20190606.clone%26utm_source%3Demail&utm_medium=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&v=053b79c203e02d70&position=1&part=privacy&china_variant=False>  	
	
©2019 Flipboard, Inc. Made with love at 735 Emerson Street, Palo Alto, CA 94301 <https://flipboard.com/about/>  	
	
	
 <http://www.google-analytics.com/collect?v=1&tid=UA-100694527-1&cid=82a9a69c-b8fa-445e-8e0d-235a1f77e40c&t=pageview&cm=email&cs=photodesk.us.20190606.clone&cn=photodesk&dp=/email/photodesk.us.20190606.clone>  <http://email.flipboard.com/wf/open?upn=Gh4wIdJcRfQ4NO1EbQwRRFseXy2F8BJbAZ-2F-2FYHGb8O71rAtSYT6crIXg2Se7pOrAM1-2BYbnCXf7-2FNpsZOxZ71VeYyKhBLsmyIG1EoWVm-2FDn8qoX3U9x-2BYtehHUNlZ0UpztQuIfWJOTY6VZb-2B1hueZuOB3DmE6RAf1fBv-2BurtQqsN-2F-2Fpx0agvse5ADTbomW4deJruglNoHT8wlN-2BODxsgM1bDZjtBb5dFRLfcdA-2BOeH1fDeJlDzJVKiLWpLF1QZAFLaGZYNX7u-2BR94uPjf3dOHSu-2Fi88dDeFjhYaaOGEOrCqZM-2BxVkNnDv0ml441T99vjkXFJ3KrFWXxKDQXMBF3R-2Bu9jG89UTPbZ50Jker88Pi0GlrY8qBxDsRoGVQAzbNQE21OqTFNax2jZOm3RTyoktKAIi53XsQVeFzRS4F0CLgBc2wECwjFETxOJT1VVtJEb-2B> 
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032892.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 10/9/2016 1:17:28 AM 
To: Darren Indyke 
Subject: Re: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Importance: High 
i Privileged - Redacted i 
i 
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Darren Indyke wrote: 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Miller, Michael"" <___________________ 
Date: October 8, 2016 at 4:52:27 PM EDT 
To: ""Darren Indyke ________________ 
Cc: ""Weingarten, Reid"" <RWeingarten@steptoe.com> 
Subject: FW: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Privileged - Redacted 
Michael C. Miller 
Partner 
www.steptoe.com/mmiller 
Steptoe 
direct Steptoe & Johnson LLP 
fax 1114 Avenue of the Americas 
cell New York, NY 10036 
www.steptoe.com  
This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. 
From: Palazzolo, Joseph 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 4:49 PM 
To: Miller, Michael 
Subject: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Hi, Michael. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032892 
I'm writing about the Jane Doe case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Can I talk to you briefly? Story is likely 
going online in the next couple hours. Apologies for the short notice. I wanted to get a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein. 
Thanks and best, 
Joe 
Joe Palazzolo 
Staff reporter 
1211 Avenue of the Americas 
New York, NY 10036  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032893 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020379.txt,"Zand

6. “It’s very mysterious ...”—Author’s interviews, Michael Hayden

7. “My first surprise ...” -- I interviewed 6 members of the Mira staff, all of whom asked me
not to identify them. Te-Ping Chen, a journalist for the Asian edition of the Wall Street
Journal, also received some similar replies when she interviewed Mira hotel employees the
day Snowden left the Mira. Te-Ping Chen and Ken Brown, “Snowden’s Options for
Refuge Narrow,” Wall Street Journal, June 10, 2013

>

8. “He sent journalist Glenn Greenwald ...”—Greenwald’s description of his encounters with
Snowden is taken mainly from Chapter I, “Contact his book,” and Chapter II “Ten Days in
Hong Kong” of his book. See Glenn Greenwald, No Place to Hide, (Metropolitan Books,
New York) 2014, pp7-32.

>

9. “directly contacted via email...”—See Barton Gellman and Laura Poitras, “Code Name
Verax: Snowden, in exchange with Post reporter, made clear he knew risks,

Washington Post, June 9, 2013

10. “He proposed we meet...”—Author’s interview with Keith Bradsher. Bradsher wrote a
number of excellent articles about Snowden and Ho. See Keith Bradsher, “Hasty Exit
Started With Pizza Inside a Hong Kong Hideout.” New York Times, June 24, 2013

11. “Appointment with Robert Tibbo...”==Author’s interviews with Tibbo.

“Meet with me on condition...”—this source, as well as many others in the investigation,
spoke to me on condition that I did not identify them by name.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020379
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016084.txt,"ATLAS, CERN

“Good one, publish.”
Milliken

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016084
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033232.txt,"From: Larry Visoski 
Sent: 4/16/2017 12:24:32 PM 
To: Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: TRUMP 
Jeffrey 
Just remembered, POTUS is in PBI until 4:30pm today,. We Cannot fly from STT to PBI since we are not 
departing from a TSA approved scanning airport. We could land Fort Lauderdale or Stuart only,. If you 
elected to arrive before 4:30pm., 
After 4:30pm PBI arrival is OK,. 
Thx 
Larry 
Sent from my iPad 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033232 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029053.txt,"Bannon: First of all, Benjamin, I can tell you I could hardly recognize you, you’re so
cleaned up you are for the conference.

[Laughter]

Questioner: Hello, my name is Deborah Lubov. I’m a Vatican correspondent for Zenit
news agency, for their English edition. I have some experience working in New York — I
was working for PricewaterhouseCoopers auditing investment banks, one of which was
Goldman Sachs. And considering this conference is on poverty, I’m curious — from your
point of view especially, your experience in the investment banking world — what
concrete measures do you think they should be doing to combat, prevent this
phenomenon? We know that various sums of money are used in all sorts of ways and they
do have different initiatives, but in order to concretely counter this epidemic now, what

are your thoughts?

“For Christians, and particularly for those who believe in the underpinnings of the
Judeo-Christian West, I don’t believe that we should have a [financial] bailout.”

Bannon: That’s a great question. The 2008 crisis, I think the financial crisis — which, by
the way, I don’t think we’ve come through — is really driven I believe by the greed, much
of it driven by the greed of the investment banks. My old firm, Goldman Sachs —
traditionally the best banks are leveraged 8:1. When we had the financial crisis in 2008,
the investment banks were leveraged 35:1. Those rules had specifically been changed by a
guy named Hank Paulson. He was secretary of Treasury. As chairman of Goldman Sachs,
he had gone to Washington years before and asked for those changes. That made the
banks not really investment banks, but made them hedge funds — and highly susceptible
to changes in liquidity. And so the crisis of 2008 was, quite frankly, really never recovered
from in the United States. It’s one of the reasons last quarter you saw 2.9% negative
growth in a quarter. So the United States economy is in very, very tough shape.

And one of the reasons is that we’ve never really gone and dug down and sorted through
the problems of 2008. Particularly the fact — think about it — not one criminal charge has
ever been brought to any bank executive associated with 2008 crisis. And in fact, it gets

worse. No bonuses and none of their equity was taken. So part of the prime drivers of the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029053
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012873.txt,"subjects in a brain scanner and invited them to play a bargaining game where they could punish someone
who acted unfairly to them — personal revenge — or punish someone who acted unfairly to someone
else — impersonal punishment. For each subject, Strobel also collected information on a gene called
COMT Met. This gene has three different forms, linked to differences in activity level in the frontal lobe
of the brain, which are linked to differences in the levels of dopamine, which are linked to differences in
the experience of reward. Given the different forms of COMT Met, at least part of what we experience as
the feeling of reward or gratification was determined by our parents, and our parent’s parents, and their
parent’s parents, all the way back to our ape-like cousins who evolved this gene.

When Strobel looked at the brain scans of his subjects, he found that the same circuitry was
engaged for personal revenge and impersonal punishment, with significant activity in the striatum — a
reward area — as well as in the insula — an area involved in the feeling of disgust. When we detect an
injustice, we feel disgusted, a feeling that may motivate our desire for retribution. The striatum finishes
off the process, rewarding us for our punitive response, and wiping out the negative feeling of disgust.
Importantly, individuals with the high expressing form of COMT Met, and thus, higher levels of
dopamine, showed stronger activation in the striatum, and were more likely to punish those who act
unfairly. Strobel suggests that those with the high expressing form punished more because they
anticipated a higher level of reward. If this explanation is right, it has profound consequences for how we
think about individual participation in the policing of norms and the honey hits associated with
aggression. Some people will have a natural bias to shy away from punishment, not because they fail to
see the importance of ratting out cheaters, but because they don’t anticipate feeling good about it. Others
will be prone to punish even the most minor infractions because they feel empowered and good about it.
Those who are empowered to punish because it feels good have forged a stronger association between
aggression and reward. Unbeknownst to these individuals, they started life with a bias, one that colored
their willingness to harm others. This bias is joined by many others that I discuss in the next few sections.

The take home message is that if you are born male, endowed with certain genetic variants such
as the low activity form of MAOA, and experience physical and psychological abuse by your parents, the
odds of delinquency are frighteningly high. That’s the bad news. The good news is that if you are born
male, have the high activity variant of the MAOA gene, and experience physical and psychological abuse
by your parents, you are vaccinated by nature against the harms of your unfortunate nurture. The
problem, of course, is that you have no say over which endowment you get, nor over the kinds of parents
you receive.

One of the reasons I have worked through this case study of genetic constraints and
environmental sculpting is to provide an antidote to the often polarized views that have dominated much

of the historical and psychological literature on evil. Many of the earliest, and most famous psychological

Hauser Chapter 4. Wicked in waiting 127

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012873
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019111.txt,"﻿A POWERFUL BILLIONAIRE, 
THE SEX SCANDAL THAT UNDID HIM, AND ALL 
THE JUSTICE THAT MONEY CAN BUY: 
THE SHOCKING TRUE STORY OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
1426 
Interviewer: ""It's the 
too close to the sun."" 
Jeffrey Epstein: ""Did 
Copyright CO 2016 by James Patterson 
Excerpt from Cross the Line copyright © 2016 by James Patterson 
Hachette Book Group supports the right to free expression and the value of 
copyright. The purpose of copyright is to encourage writers and artists to 
produce the creative works that enrich our culture. 
The scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book without permission 
is a theft of the author's intellectual property. If you would like permission 
to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), please con-
tact permissions@hbgusa.com. Thank you for your support of the author's 
rights. 
Little, Brown and Company 
Hachette Book Group 
1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104 
littlebrown.com 
First Edition: October 2016 
Little, Brown and Company is a division of Hachette Book Group, Inc. The 
Little, Brown name and logo are trademarks of Hachette Book Group, Inc. 
The publisher is not responsible for websites (or their content) that are not 
owned by the publisher. 
The Hachette Speakers Bureau provides a wide range of authors for speaking 
events. To find out more, go to hachettespeakersbureau.com or call (866) 
376-6591. 
ISBN 978-0-316-27405-0 (hc) / 978-0-316-31758-0 (large print) 
LCCN 2016946084 
10 9 8 7 6 5 43 2 1 
LSC-C 
Printed in the United States of America 
016 by James Patterson 
to free expression and the value of 
o encourage writers and artists to 
ir culture. 
n of this book without permission 
Ierty. If you would like permission 
n for review purposes), please con-
)1.1 for your support of the author's 
NY 10104 
). of Hachette Book Group, Inc. The 
.rks of Hachette Book Group, Inc. 
)sites (or their content) that are not 
a wide range of authors for speaking 
tespeakersbureau.com or call (866) 
6-31758-0 (large print) 
Interviewer: ""It's the Icarus story—someone who flies 
too close to the sun."" 
Jeffrey Epstein: ""Did Icarus like massages?"" 
—New York City, 2007 
AUTHOR'S NOTE 
Late one afternoon, while taking a leisurely stroll on the Upper 
East Side of Manhattan, Tim Malloy, a friend of mine and a col-
laborator on this book, nearly ran into a trim, silver-haired 
neighbor of ours from Palm Beach. 
The man was walking down Madison Avenue, and several 
things about him were striking. For one thing, he was wearing 
slippers. Expensive, embroidered, monogrammed slippers. But 
slippers all the same. 
For another, he was accompanied by two attractive women. 
Even in Manhattan, an island that attracts beautiful women from 
all over the world, these women stood out. 
As the man half shuffled, half walked down the avenue, the 
women walked slightly behind him, as if they were attendants or 
staff. 
Tim followed, keeping a respectable distance, as the three-
some made a right onto 71st Street and headed toward an enor-
mous town house— a house that was almost a fortress—right 
vii 
AUTHOR'S NOTE 
in the middle of the block. The imposing residence had a stone 
facade and a fifteen-foot-high front door that wouldn't have 
looked out of place protecting a castle. And, like our neighbor's 
slippers, the house had a monogram: raised brass letters that 
spelled out JE. 
The house and, quite possibly, the two women belonged to 
Jeffrey Epstein, a rich and powerful man who was also a regis-
tered sex offender with a strong taste for underage women. 
Not just sixteen- and seventeen-year-olds. But younger girls 
as well. 
Epstein was alleged to have abused dozens of young women, 
or, more accurately, girls. He'd settled potential lawsuits with 
some of them. He'd done a bit of prison time for his crimes. A bit 
of time. And now here he was, out in the world again. 
Accompanied by two beautiful young women. 
I had been hearing hair-raising stories about Jeffrey Epstein for a 
couple of years. Our interests could not have been more differ-
ent, but Palm Beach, where we both live, is small and tightly 
knit, and we knew some of the same people. 
Epstein's arrest had made headlines in papers all over the 
world. But in Palm Beach, it caused a scandal that continues to 
set off aftershocks and leave a bad smell. 
So I had followed Epstein's case in the media and talked 
about it over dinners with friends. I wondered why it had taken 
so long for the Palm Beach police to catch up with Epstein. And, 
once they did, why he had served so little jail time. 
Those were the obvious questions, but there were others: 
How had Epstein made his money, possibly billions? No one 
viii 
seemed to know. And w 
about the underage girls 
had happened at the morn 
Epstein definitely Ilk( 
even three, young wom( 
island. He'd been operat 
who were these girls? WI 
find their way to his horn 
Epstein had powerful 
in his private jet and rubt 
Prize winners, any numl 
man sixth in line to the B 
Were any of these co 
now a free man? 
I wanted to know. Aft 
and Epstein's actions had 
where I lived. Stirred by t 
Tim Malloy and I began t 
We partnered with 
journalist who had once I 
following the Epstein sto: 
Working together, we 
the way back to his chil( 
tances, employees, neight 
with the families of his 
ment officers who'd wonl 
and lawyers on all sides 
which are still working ti 
Combining our inter 
from court filings and 
AUTHOR'S NOTE 
NoTE 
'posing residence had a stone 
mit door that wouldn't have 
tstle. And, like our neighbor's 
ram: raised brass letters that 
, the two women belonged to 
ul man who was also a regis-
;te for underage women. 
n-year-olds. But younger girls 
ased dozens of young women, 
flied potential lawsuits with 
ison time for his crimes. A bit 
in the world again. 
tng women. 
ries about Jeffrey Epstein for a 
id not have been more differ-
oth live, is small and tightly 
le people. 
Lanes in papers all over the 
:c1 a scandal that continues to 
smell. 
ase in the media and talked 
I wondered why it had taken 
o catch up with Epstein. And, 
;o little jail time. 
tions, but there were others: 
ey, possibly billions? No one 
seemed to know. And while the news media had some details 
about the underage girls, reporters seemed only to know what 
had happened at the moment of his arrest. 
Epstein definitely liked his massages. He got them from two, 
even three, young women a day, right in his mansion on the 
island. He'd been operating on an almost industrial scale. But 
who were these girls? Where had they come from? How did they 
find their way to his home on a secluded street in Palm Beach? 
Epstein had powerful friends. He'd flown Bill Clinton around 
in his private jet and rubbed shoulders with heads of state, Nobel 
Prize winners, any number of billionaires. Prince Andrew, the 
man sixth in line to the British throne, had been a close friend. 
Were any of these connections the reason that Epstein was 
now a free man? 
I wanted to know. After all, our homes were a half mile apart, 
and Epstein's actions had had an undeniable impact on the town 
where I lived. Stirred by that sighting of Epstein up in New York, 
Tim Malloy and I began to investigate. 
We partnered with John Connolly, a tough, no-nonsense 
journalist who had once been a cop with the NYPD and had been 
following the Epstein story for close to ten years. 
Working together, we interviewed Epstein's friends, going all 
the way back to his childhood; we met with Epstein's acquain-
tances, employees, neighbors, and business associates, and finally 
with the families of his victims. We interviewed law enforce-
ment officers who'd worked on the investigation in Palm Beach 
and lawyers on all sides of the resulting court cases, some of 
which are still working their way through the court system. 
Combining our interview material with evidence obtained 
from court filings and other investigations, such as the one 
ix 
AUTHOR'S NOTE 
conducted by Connolly's Vanity Fair colleague Vicky Ward, we 
began to put the pieces together. 
In a few instances, we have re-created brief scenes and 
snatches of dialogue. These are based on interviews, police 
investigation documents, and court filings. We changed the 
names and identities of the girls, hoping to protect them from 
more embarrassment and harm. 
There never was any doubt that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty. He 
admitted as much in the non-prosecution agreement he agreed 
to sign in 2007. The question is, what exactly was he guilty of? 
This book attempts to answer that question and many others 
about this strange and mysterious man. These days people all 
around the world are angry about and suspicious of the super 
rich and powerful. The story of Jeffrey Epstein is an object lesson 
about why we ought to be. To put it simply, some people think 
they can operate outside the law. And that's what they do. 
—James Patterson, Palm Beach, February 20, 2016 
x 
NOT E 
'air colleague Vicky Ward, we 
: re-created brief scenes and 
based on interviews, police 
)urt filings. We changed the 
hoping to protect them from 
t Jeffrey Epstein was guilty. He 
secution agreement he agreed 
hat exactly was he guilty of? 
that question and many others 
,s man. These days people all 
it and suspicious of the super 
frey Epstein is an object lesson 
t it simply, some people think 
knd that's what they do. 
?alm Beach, February 20, 2016 
PART I 
The Crime 
CHAPTER I 
Mary: February 2005 
/t's a typically slow South Florida Sunday, and Mary's staring 
into the mirror, trying to wipe the morning cobwebs away 
from her dark, sleepy eyes. 
She's a pretty girl, tiny—just five feet three inches tall—but 
tanned and athletic, with curly black henna-streaked hair.* Her 
bedroom's a playland of pinks and pastels, stuffed animals, and 
boy-band posters. But Mary's a teenager now. Fourteen years old. 
She even has a boyfriend. He's cute and popular. Joe' is the heart-
throb of her school, and Mary's feelings for him are new to her, 
powerful, hard to untangle. She's thinking of Joe as she presses 
the Play button on her iPod. 
The MP3 player's on shuffle. There's no telling what song will 
* Mary's name, some identifying details, and dialogue have been changed. 
Joe's name, some identifying details, and dialogue have been changed. 
3 
JAMES PATTERSON 
come up, and Mary's head drops dramatically in anticipation. 
Then a loud, sexy throb spills out of the earbuds: Britney Spears. 
The bass line takes over, and she starts to dance, moving her 
hips as she lip-synchs the lyrics: 
With a taste of a poison paradise . . . 
Mary's swept away by the song. She's twirling around and 
around, flinging her arms out to grab the clothes hanging up in 
her closet—it's like embracing ten thousand fans! Then she stops 
and pulls out the earbuds. Suddenly she's become fourteen again. 
Just a girl, jittery, nervous. 
What she's thinking about now is what she will wear to the 
big fancy house. 
Mary desperately wants to make an impression. This will be her 
first trip to the house. She does not want to look like a child on 
this outing. 
She picks out a pair of skinny white jeans, puts on a freshly 
washed halter top that leaves her flat stomach bare. The cross 
that Joe gave her last Christmas hangs from her neck. 
Think of the money, she thinks. 
For Mary, it's incredible money. Several weeks' wages at 
Mickey D's. And just for giving some old man a massage? She 
twists the earbuds back in, dives into the closet, sings along with 
Britney Spears: 
Don't you know that you're toxic? 
The tight white jeans fit Mary perfectly. She turns to check 
herself out in the mirror, cropping the scene with her fingers to 
4 
block out the Barbies bi 
in big, high-ceilinged b( 
with natural smiles, pei 
dolls are beautiful. The, 
if Mom and Dad are w 
mothers and fathers are 
you get Barbies— passe 
sister to sister. They're n-
of knowingness to the c 
American Girl dolls are 
Barbie's dangling her lot 
from women. 
Be like Barbie, Mary t 
She can't be nervous. 
What she tells hersel 
a deal. 
But, of course, it is a 
big fancy house will bee 
police investigation— al 
the Palm Beach PD — ar 
the home's owner, Jeffrey 
ERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
dramatically in anticipation. 
)f the earbuds: Britney Spears. 
starts to dance, moving her 
She's twirling around and 
prab the clothes hanging up in 
thousand fans! Then she stops 
ly she's become fourteen again. 
AT is what she will wear to the 
in impression. This will be her 
ot want to look like a child on 
• white jeans, puts on a freshly 
r flat stomach bare. The cross 
angs from her neck. 
)ney. Several weeks' wages at 
some old man a massage? She 
nto the closet, sings along with 
c? 
y perfectly. She turns to check 
ig the scene with her fingers to 
block out the Barbies behind her. Over on the Gold Coast, girls 
in big, high-ceilinged bedrooms have American Girl dolls. Dolls 
with natural smiles, perfectly vacant moon faces. American Girl 
dolls are beautiful. They're expensive. But you have to have one 
if Mom and Dad are willing to pay. Over on the Coast, most 
mothers and fathers are. But out in the sticks, where Mary lives, 
you get Barbies —passed down from mother to daughter, from 
sister to sister. They're rail-thin, missile-breasted. There's a touch 
of knowingness to the curl of their otherwise innocent mouths. 
American Girl dolls are girlie, but Barbie's like Britney Spears. 
Barbie's dangling her long legs over the line that separates girls 
from women. 
Be like Barbie, Mary thinks. 
She can't be nervous. Not now. Not today. 
What she tells herself, over and over again, is: It's not that big 
a deal. 
But, of course, it is a big deal. Before long, Mary's visit to the 
big fancy house will become part of a months-long Palm Beach 
police investigation—an affidavit for probable cause, filed by 
the Palm Beach PD — and, finally, the arrest and conviction of 
the home's owner, Jeffrey Epstein. 
5 
CHAPTER 2 
Jeffrey Epstein: February 2005 
Jeffrey's morning routine is precise and unvarying. First he 
spends twenty-five minutes in silence, visualizing the day 
ahead as he digests the guava, banana, and Mileslix that his 
chef prepares for him— the same way every day—at six in the 
morning. Then Jeffrey walks a third of a mile up to South County 
Road, pausing once in a while to take deep, restorative breaths. 
It's a slight slope that leads toward the ocean. Jeffrey's home 
on the Intracoastal Waterway is behind him now. The morning's 
not windy. The Atlantic is calm and glittery, and fishing trawlers 
bob gently on distant waves. 
Jeffrey's partial to monogrammed sweatpants, monogrammed 
fleece pullovers, and hoodies. Casual attire offset by embroi-
dered Stubbs & Wootton slippers— the kind that sell for hun-
dreds of dollars a pair. His hair, which is thick, has turned silver. 
But Jeffrey Epstein does not have a paunch. For a fifty-two-year-old 
6 
man, he's extremely fit. 
strong jawline. 
He's never been a di 
and he takes care good c 
It's a magnificent min 
lations, abstract formu1a5 
math problems that woul 
fall into place for him, 
manipulate—and multip 
mathematician. As a you 
Then he became an inve5 
philanthropist, like Bill G 
to give millions to acadei 
ing mysteries of the brain 
lions to Harvard. And h 
Eliot Spitzer, of New Yor 
Mexico, where Epstein ON 
Epstein's flown Bill 
the Gulfstream he owns 
own trading floor—so 1 
his various and worthy ( 
Just for fun, Chris 1 
Kevin Spacey had tagge( 
""Jeffrey is both a higl 
philanthropist with a 
in-depth knowledge of 
would say through a spc 
insights and generosity 
on democratization, em 
combating HIV/AIDS."" 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 2 
ecise and unvarying. First he 
a silence, visualizing the day 
banana, and Mileslix that his 
way every day—at six in the 
.d of a mile up to South County 
ake deep, restorative breaths. 
ward the ocean. Jeffrey's home 
ehind him now. The morning's 
id glittery, and fishing trawlers 
ied sweatpants, monogrammed 
.asual attire offset by embroi-
s— the kind that sell for hun-
hich is thick, has turned silver. 
paunch. For a fifty-two-year-old 
man, he's extremely fit. Six feet tall, 180 pounds, brown eyes, a 
strong jawline. 
He's never been a drinker. He doesn't smoke or take drugs, 
and he takes care good care of his body as well as his mind. 
It's a magnificent mind. His gift is for numbers: complex calcu-
lations, abstract formulas. Even as a child, Jeffrey could untangle 
math problems that would stump most smart adults. Numbers just 
fall into place for him, forming in ranks he can bend, twist, 
manipulate—and multiply. He could have been a scientist or a 
mathematician. As a young man, he taught calculus and physics. 
Then he became an investor—a very rich man. Then he became a 
philanthropist, like Bill Gates. His love for science has inspired him 
to give millions to academics and institutions committed to study-
ing mysteries of the brain and the arcana of physics. He's given mil-
lions to Harvard. And he's given money to politicians: Governor 
Eliot Spitzer, of New York, and Governor Bill Richardson, of New 
Mexico, where Epstein owns the largest home in the state. 
Epstein's flown Bill Clinton to Africa on a private jet—not 
the Gulfstream he owns but his Boeing 727, customized with its 
own trading floor —so that the former president could promote 
his various and worthy causes. 
Just for fun, Chris Tucker, the comedian, and Clinton's pal 
Kevin Spacey had tagged along for the ride. 
""Jeffrey is both a highly successful financier and a committed 
philanthropist with a keen sense of global markets and an 
in-depth knowledge of twenty-first-century science,"" Clinton 
would say through a spokesperson. ""I especially appreciated his 
insights and generosity during the recent trip to Africa to work 
on democratization, empowering the poor, citizen service, and 
combating HIV/AIDS."" 
7 
JAMES PATTERSON 
But is Jeffrey thinking about that trip now? 
His first guest is due that morning at nine, and that leaves 
him enough time for a shower, a lunch, and a few phone calls 
before the second girl arrives. 
Sarah has scheduled that girl for one. 
For Jeffrey, it's just part of the daily routine. 
But on this day, there's a delicious twist. 
One of the girls is a first-timer. 
Mary: February 200.f 
D ownstairs, the dc 
gruffly: 
""Ella estd aqui 
""She's here. Your friel 
Mary runs down the 
got the TV on. Her steprr 
sister has gone out, too, I 
""Going shopping,"" sh 
Bubble into her mouth. 
""Ace quien?"" 
""Says who?"" 
Mary's already half' 
again, but on Sundays t. 
Besides, Mary knows hE 
she's made. Real mone) 
8 
3RSON 
it trip now? 
fling at nine, and that leaves 
lunch, and a few phone calls 
1r one. 
laily routine. 
us twist. 
CHAPTER 3 
Mary: February 2005 
ownstairs, the doorbell is ringing. Mary's father shouts, 
gruffly: 
""Ella estci aqui. Su amiga con el camiOn."" 
""She's here. Your friend with the truck."" 
Mary runs down the stairs. It's game day, and Dad's already 
got the TV on. Her stepmom's out running errands. Mary's twin 
sister has gone out, too, Rollerblading with a few of her friends. 
""Going *shopping,"" she yells, and she pops a piece of Dubble 
Bubble into her mouth. 
`2Dice quien?"" 
""Says who?"" 
Mary's already halfway out the door. Her father calls out 
again, but on Sundays there's no getting him out of his chair. 
Besides, Mary knows he'll be happy when he sees the money 
she's made. Real money, like Joe's cousin Wendy Dobbs, is 
9 
JAMES PATTERSON 
making.* And it's not like she's running off to do something 
crazy. After all, Wendy's assured her already that there's nothing 
to worry about. 
Mary's father is Cuban—an immigrant—a self-made man who 
runs a contracting business. He's wise to the ways of the world 
and highly protective of his two daughters. They're good girls, he 
knows. Almost angels. As far as he knows, they don't drink. 
They've never tried drugs. They love clothes and, especially, 
music —Britney Spears, Nelly Furtado, Maroon 5, the boy band 
with that dreamy lead singer. Mary loves California, which she's 
never seen but daydreams about. She just knows she'll live there 
someday—a plan that's okay with her father as long as Mary 
keeps up with her homework and chores. 
What he worries about, in the meantime, is the crowd that 
Mary runs with. 
Joe is a fine boy. More responsible than most American boys 
his age. But Joe's cousin, Wendy, is another story. Mary's father 
doesn't like Wendy at all and would have liked her even less had 
he known about Wendy's intentions. 
In just one hour, Wendy's told Mary, she can make more 
money than her father makes in a day: ""This guy in Palm Beach. 
He's rich. Very rich. He has an airplane. He owns an island, you 
know?"" 
Like a lot of kids who live inland, away from the Florida 
coast, Mary's dreams reach way beyond the dull, scrubby flat-
* Wendy Dobbs's name, some identifying details, and dialogue have been 
changed. 
10 
lands and strip malls s: 
that she wants to do an 
miles away, might as we 
""Yes,"" she had said, v 
Then there was Joe ti 
""Who is this guy?"" J( 
know a thing about him 
""Hundreds of dollar: 
quite look at Joe, but she 
Joe seemed to think 
conversation—some bac 
hadn't even crossed Mar 
would become a regular 
""To rub his feet? Are 
it, why haven't you told y 
""It's your cousin, Joe! 
""The guy's feet must I 
""Shut up!"" 
""Tell your father."" 
""You know how E 
everything."" 
""I'm not going to som 
""That's right. I am."" 
""And if! told your fat] 
""You'd never see me al 
Mary felt bad as she 
She knew that it wouli 
Wendy had told her 
RSON 
FILTHY RICH 
unning off to do something 
!.r already that there's nothing 
grant—a self-made man who 
wise to the ways of the world 
ughters. They're good girls, he 
he knows, they don't drink. 
love clothes and, especially, 
-tad°, Maroon 5, the boy band 
y loves California, which she's 
She just knows she'll live there 
th her father as long as Mary 
chores. 
e meantime, is the crowd that 
sible than most American boys 
is another story. Mary's father 
Lid have liked her even less had 
)ns. 
Did Mary, she can make more 
I day: ""This guy in Palm Beach. 
.rplane. He owns an island, you 
inland, away from the Florida 
beyond the dull, scrubby flat-
ying details, and dialogue have been 
0 
lands and strip malls she's grown up around. There's so much 
that she wants to do and see. But for her the Gold Coast, twenty 
miles away, might as well be another country. 
""Yes,"" she had said, without even thinking about it. 
Then there was Joe to contend with. 
""Who is this guy?"" Joe had said, shaking his head. ""You don't 
know a thing about him."" 
""Hundreds of dollars,"" Mary had whispered. She couldn't 
quite look at Joe, but she was firm: ""I can make that in one hour"" 
Joe seemed to think they were actually talking about it. A 
conversation—some back-and-forth. But the thought of not going 
hadn't even crossed Mary's mind. If anything, she hoped that it 
would become a regular thing. 
""To rub his feet? Are you kidding? If you're not worried about 
it, why haven't you told your dad?"" 
""It's your cousin, Joe! Some girls go three times a week."" 
""The guy's feet must be killing him."" 
""Shut up!"" 
""Tell your father."" 
""You know how Dad is. You don't tell your parents 
everything."" 
""I'm not going to some freak's mansion to rub his feet."" 
""That's right. I am."" 
""And if I told your father? Or mine?"" 
""You'd never see me again."" 
Mary felt bad as she said it. She felt bad for lying. 
She knew that it would be more than a foot rub. 
Wendy had told her that much, at least. 
11 
CHAPTER 4 
Jeffrey Epstein: February 2005 
John Kluge, the media magnate, has bought up several lots 
around here, torn down the mansions, and built a grand, 
sprawling estate. But Epstein's neighbors have blocked his 
own efforts to buy more land and increase his holdings. 
Epstein's address in Palm Beach is 358 El Brillo Way. Built in 
the fifties by a totally run-of-the-mill architect, the house has 
none of the elegance of his neighbors' homes. It's big, with a big 
swimming pool—that's the most you can say for it. It's totally 
bland. But it's the last house on a dead-end block, the last block 
of the street, and this makes it very secluded. 
Tonight, one of Epstein's black Escalades will whisk him 
away, taking him to the private terminal at Palm Beach Interna-
tional Airport. Then a short flight down to Little Saint James — 
or, as he likes to call it, Little Saint Jeff's—the seventy-eight-acre 
island he owns in the Virgin Islands. But for the moment, there 
12 
are still things to attend I 
although, in Epstein's exp( 
nicely. 
He strolls through th 
door that leads to the kitc 
dishes and climbs a wide, 
He walks down a hallway 
naked women. Then, in h 
there are many more phoi 
wall, of girls who have cor 
Familiar faces, famil 
first-timers so special. 
Epstein checks his wat 
The Virgin Islands can 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 4 
05 
ite, has bought up several lots 
mansions, and built a grand, 
neighbors have blocked his 
I increase his holdings. 
tch is 358 El Brillo Way. Built in 
.e-mill architect, the house has 
ibors' homes. It's big, with a big 
St you can say for it. It's totally 
a dead-end block, the last block 
ry secluded. 
lack Escalades will whisk him 
terminal at Palm Beach Interna-
;ht down to Little Saint James — 
[nt Jeff's— the seventy-eight-acre 
Lands. But for the moment, there 
are still things to attend to in Florida. Business and pleasure — 
although, in Epstein's experience, the two have always fit together 
nicely. 
He strolls through the gate, past the guard, up to the side 
door that leads to the kitchen. Inside, he ignores the maid doing 
dishes and climbs a wide, winding staircase to the second floor. 
He walks down a hallway, one that's lined with photographs of 
naked women. Then, in his bedroom, he opens a closet. Inside, 
there are many more photographs. Erotic photos, tacked to the 
wall, of girls who have come to the house. 
Familiar faces, familiar bodies. That's what makes the 
first-timers so special. 
Epstein checks his watch before closing the door. 
The Virgin Islands can wait. 
13 
CHAPTER 5 
Mary: February 2005 
The Dubble Bubble's lost all its flavor, but Mary's still chew-
ing the gum as she shifts, nervously, in the backseat of 
Wendy's big pickup truck. The girl sitting up front next 
to Wendy is a stranger to Mary. She's chain-smoking menthols. 
The music is blaring; the seat is filthy and gross. Worried that 
her white jeans will get grody, Mary sits on her hands. Then, 
through the window, she sees a gigantic resort called the Break-
ers. It is resplendent, sun-drenched, not quite real—like some-
thing you'd see in the movies. 
It makes for an interesting contrast. 
""We'll wait for her,"" Wendy says to the girl in the passenger 
seat. ""Then we can all go to the mall."" 
""Which one?"" 
""The Gardens."" 
It's like she's not there. Mary wants to say something about it, 
14 
but she doesn't know if th( 
dy's always seemed so mi 
other girl's just a mystery. 
speak to Mary, her stare SE 
girl. 
""Remember,"" Wendy s 
davit filed by the Palm Bee 
are, say eighteen."" 
The light changes, anc 
looking at Mary in the rea 
""Got it?"" 
Mary nods. 
""I mean it,"" says Wend 
Who would believe het 
than that. 
""Okay,"" she says. ""I got 
Mary takes out her flu 
cousin is a BAMF."" 
A badass motherfuckei 
There's no reply. 
""Or maybe she's just a 1 
Still no reply. 
Joe must still be in churc 
They pass El Bravo Wa: 
Wendy's driving slowl: 
more, she says: ""When the 
Mary nods again and 
see her smiling. To know 
Wendy's eyes are on the fn 
they walk past a guard. 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 5 
its flavor, but Mary's still chew-
nervously, in the backseat of 
:. The girl sitting up front next 
She's chain-smoking menthols. 
filthy and gross. Worried that 
Mary sits on her hands. Then, 
gigantic resort called the Break-
hed, not quite real—like some-
mtrast. 
says to the girl in the passenger 
:nall."" 
wants to say something about it, 
14 
but she doesn't know if the other girls would even respond. Wen-
dy's always seemed so much cooler than kids Mary's age. This 
other girl's just a mystery. And when Wendy does turn around to 
speak to Mary, her stare seems to slice right through the younger 
girl. 
""Remember,"" Wendy says, according to a probable cause affi-
davit filed by the Palm Beach police. ""When he asks how old you 
are, say eighteen."" 
The light changes, and Wendy turns back around but keeps 
looking at Mary in the rearview mirror. 
""Got it?"" 
Mary nods. 
""I mean it,"" says Wendy. 
Who would believe her? Anyone can see that Mary is younger 
than that. 
""Okay,"" she says. ""I got it. Eighteen."" 
Mary takes out her flip phone and sends Joe a text: ""Your 
cousin is a BAMF."" 
A badass motherfucker. 
There's no reply. 
""Or maybe she's just a bitch,"" Mary texts. 
Still no reply. 
Joe must still be in church, Mary thinks. 
They pass El Bravo Way and turn onto El Brillo Way. 
Wendy's driving slowly now, right at the speed limit. Once 
more, she says: ""When the man asks your age, say eighteen."" 
Mary nods again and smiles, slightly. She wants Wendy to 
see her smiling. To know that she's got it all under control. But 
Wendy's eyes are on the front gate now. It opens, she parks, and 
they walk past a guard. 
15 
JAMES PATTERSON 
""We're here to see Jeff,"" says Wendy. 
The guard nods—of course you are—and leads them to the 
side door. 
They're in the kitchen now. Mary, Wendy, some middle-aged 
man. The man has a long face, bushy eyebrows, and thick silver 
hair—and he's fit. As fit as the jocks that Mary goes to school 
with. Not attractive, exactly. He's way too old for that. But confi-
dent, in a way that makes an impression. 
Standing behind the man there's a woman. She's blond, very 
pretty, much taller than Wendy. 
What a strange scene, Mary thinks. She can't shake the feeling 
that the man is studying her. Then he nods, and he and Wendy 
walk out of the kitchen. A little while later, they're back. 
""Sarah,"" the man says to the tall woman. ""You can take Mary 
upstairs."" 
Sarah takes Mary up a wide winding staircase carpeted in pink. 
Together they walk down a hall that's got photographs on the 
wall—naked women. Long curtains cover windows and don't 
let in much light. In the air, there's a strong lavender fragrance. 
Then they come to a room containing a green-and-pink sofa. 
There's a large bathroom off to one side and doors on either side 
of the sofa. There's a wooden armoire with sex toys on it. There's 
a massage table, too, and a mural of a naked woman. 
""Wait here,"" says Sarah. ""Jeff will be up in a moment."" 
Mary's too freaked out to do anything else. Fidgeting with 
her belt loops, she sits on the sofa, jumps up again. 
16 
Then she sees the pictu 
All the girls in the pho, 
just a baby. 
Much younger than Ivli 
The girl's smiling, bu 
else—some sort of anxiet 
face. And what she's doinl 
off to the side. Flashing or 
toward the camera. 
Mary gasps. She turns 
in front of her, wearing nol 
:RSON 
FILTHY RICH 
ndy. 
are—and leads them to the 
7, Wendy, some middle-aged 
hy eyebrows, and thick silver 
cks that Mary goes to school 
vay too old for that. But confi-
ssion. 
a woman. She's blond, very 
iks. She can't shake the feeling 
a he nods, and he and Wendy 
-ale later, they're back. 
.11 woman. ""You can take Mary 
ling staircase carpeted in pink. 
that's got photographs on the 
ains cover windows and don't 
's a strong lavender fragrance. 
tataining a green-and-pink sofa. 
ae side and doors on either side 
Loire with sex toys on it. There's 
of a naked woman. 
will be up in a moment."" 
) anything else. Fidgeting with 
a, jumps up again. 
6 
Then she sees the picture. 
All the girls in the photos are young. But the girl in this one's 
just a baby. 
Much younger than Mary herself. 
The girl's smiling, but the smile's mixed with something 
else—some sort of anxiety that's out of place on such a small 
face. And what she's doing is shocking: pulling her underwear 
off to the side. Flashing one of her tiny apple-round butt cheeks 
toward the camera. 
Mary gasps. She turns around. And there's Epstein standing 
in front of her, wearing nothing but a towel. 
17 
CHAPTER 6 
Michael Reiter: March 2005 
Chief Reiter looks more like a bank president than a cop. 
He's well built, with an air of formality and discretion. But 
he's got twenty-four years on the job. Decades earlier, he 
was a campus police officer in Pittsburgh. Then he rose, steadily, 
through the ranks in Palm Beach, moving up from patrol officer 
to detective, working vice, narcotics, and organized crime, then 
becoming a sergeant, captain, major, and assistant chief—a job 
he held for three years—before becoming chief of police. Reiter 
is what you'd call seasoned, although chief of police in Palm 
Beach is a job that calls upon his political skills as much as his 
street smarts. 
Then again, from time to time, things do happen. 
Once in a blue moon there are murders— though these are 
so rare that they tend to be remembered for decades. 
Sometimes there are hurricanes to contend with, and, when the 
18 
sea calms, human cargo 
fickers aim the bows of th( 
order their passengers to 
Most of the passengers 
who stake all they have cm 
to time, Palm Beach cops I 
Things get busier dur 
it, the season. It's when i 
ties and balls, shop, and 
Worth Avenue. The popt: 
who work under Chief R 
ers, and snotty skateboar 
tic disturbances. Chokin 
stuff, but there's always 
women who work for Rei 
Chief Reiter's proud ( 
knows, they're lucky to 
for the job. If anything, h 
the John F. Kennedy Sch( 
terrorist training at Quan 
up often at cocktail partil 
hijackers lived in Palm B( 
local airstrips. A few, inci 
had been regulars at 251 
There they had regaled 
made-up stories about the 
But 251 Sunrise is sht 
2004, after an avalanche oi 
Beach is as quiet and calm 
For the moment. 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 6 
a bank president than a cop. 
Df formality and discretion. But 
on the job. Decades earlier, he 
tsburgh. Then he rose, steadily, 
, moving up from patrol officer 
tics, and organized crime, then 
Or, and assistant chief—a job 
)ecoming chief of police. Reiter 
hough chief of police in Palm 
s political skills as much as his 
e, things do happen. 
tre murders — though these are 
mbered for decades. 
to contend with, and, when the 
8 
sea calms, human cargo washes up on the shore. Sometimes traf-
fickers aim the bows of their boats at the glow of the Breakers resort, 
order their passengers to go overboard, then tell them to swim. 
Most of the passengers are Haitian—men, women, and children 
who stake all they have on a chance at a life in America. From time 
to time, Palm Beach cops have to retrieve their bodies from the surf. 
Things get busier during the wintertime, or, as the locals call 
it, the season. It's when the very rich come to town, throw par-
ties and balls, shop, and tangle traffic at the intersections around 
Worth Avenue. The population booms, and the men and women 
who work under Chief Reiter deal with fender benders, shoplift-
ers, and snotty skateboarding teenagers. There are DUIs. Domes-
tic disturbances. Choking victims and heart attacks. It's routine 
stuff, but there's always lots of it. Enough to keep the men and 
women who work for Reiter busy. 
Chief Reiter's proud of the team he has built. And, the team 
knows, they're lucky to have him. Reiter's extremely well qualified 
for the job. If anything, he's overqualified, with a certificate from 
the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and anti-
terrorist training at Quantico, courtesy of the FBI. It's not brought 
up often at cocktail parties in Palm Beach, but several of the 9/11 
hijackers lived in Palm Beach County. They took flight lessons at 
local airstrips. A few, including the mastermind, Mohamed Atta, 
had been regulars at 251 Sunrise, a chic nightclub in Palm Beach. 
There they had regaled any woman who would listen with 
made-up stories about their adventures as pilots. 
But 251 Sunrise is shuttered now. The joint was shut down in 
2004, after an avalanche of noise complaints. For the moment, Palm 
Beach is as quiet and calm as any place Reiter has dreamed about. 
For the moment. 
19 
CHAPTER 7 
Mary: March 2005 
J
f there's no traffic, Mary's hometown is less than thirty min-
utes away from the island of Palm Beach. But in economic 
terms it's a world away. Her high school is run by the county. 
Most of Mary's classmates are black. Thirty percent are Hispanic, 
as she is. The rest are white. The school has a C rating, and lots 
of students receive free or discounted lunches. Mary is one of 
those students. But inch by inch, she's working her way out of 
the crab barrel. A good kid, her teachers think. A kid with a 
future in front of her. 
Weeks have gone by since her meeting with Epstein. She 
hasn't told anyone about the visit. Still, other kids at the high 
school have noticed a change. 
""Yo, Mary,"" a friend says. ""What's up with you anyway?"" 
This is a kid who veers from nice to mean, depending on 
who else is around. 
Still, a friend. 
""Nothing,"" says Mary. 
""You got your period? 
""Shut the fuck up,"" M; 
There have been rui 
Rumors started by a girl v 
""Whore,"" her rival shc 
""You're the whore,"" M; 
Mary rushes the girl, vv 
twisting and tugging. Son 
bell rings for next period, It 
She shakes her head i 
feeling humiliated. 
Then, in her wallet, th, 
Mary's too young and too 
are all twenties, not single 
ents, her teachers sugges 
Mary do drugs or deal thei 
Mary's father knows b( 
chologist is called in. And 
Once she does, she can 
It's a wild story. Highly 
A powerful man. This is al 
It's definitely a matter for th 
recommending a transfer, 
troubled kids— ones with 
Mary's a good girl, it's t 
high school will not be tole 
FILTHY RICH 
Still, a friend. 
""Nothing,"" says Mary. 
""You got your period?"" 
""Shut the fuck up,"" Mary whispers. 
CHAPTER 7 
n.etown is less than thirty min-
Palm Beach. But in economic 
igh school is run by the county. 
ck. Thirty percent are Hispanic, 
school has a C rating, and lots 
,unted lunches. Mary is one of 
1, she's working her way out of 
r teachers think. A kid with a 
her meeting with Epstein. She 
sit. Still, other kids at the high 
rhat's up with you anyway?"" 
m nice to mean, depending on 
!O 
There have been rumors going around, she knows that. 
Rumors started by a girl who has eyes for Joe. 
""Whore,"" her rival shouts in the hallway one day. 
""You're the whore,"" Mary shouts back. 
Mary rushes the girl, who shoves back, grabbing at Mary's hair, 
twisting and tugging. Someone yells, ""Catfight!"" By the time the 
bell rings for next period, Mary's sitting in the principal's office. 
She shakes her head in reply to the questions, stays silent, 
feeling humiliated. 
Then, in her wallet, they find the three hundred dollars. 
Mary's too young and too small to be stripping. Besides, the bills 
are all twenties, not singles or fives. When they call Mary's par-
ents, her teachers suggest a more obvious explanation: Does 
Mary do drugs or deal them? 
Mary's father knows better than that. ""No,"" he insists. A psy-
chologist is called in. And then, Mary does start talking. 
Once she does, she can't stop. 
It's a wild story. Highly disturbing. A mansion in Palm Beach. 
A powerful man. This is all far from the principal's wheelhouse. 
It's definitely a matter for the police. In the meantime, the school's 
recommending a transfer, purely temporarily, to a facility for 
troubled kids—ones with ""issues."" 
Mary's a good girl, it's true. But further confrontations at the 
high school will not be tolerated. 
21 
CHAPTER 8 
Michele Pagan: March 2005 
0n March 15, Palm Beach police officer Michele Pagan 
takes the first call from Mary's stepmother. 
""Ma'am,"" she says, ""I'm going to have to ask you to 
come down to the station."" 
""I don't want to say anything more until I speak with my 
husband."" 
""Ma'am, I appreciate that. But I'd urge you to come in. Let us 
find out what happened. Please."" 
""I'll get back to you."" 
""Please, ma'am. I'm here for the rest of the day. We're on 
South County Road."" 
At the station, Mary's father does most of the talking. 
""There was an incident,"" he says. ""At school. A fight between 
Mary and another girl. But please understand, our Mary's not 
like that."" 
22 
Officer Pagan's startin 
uncharted waters. She's yc 
this have been minor. Ro 
used to the Gold Coast. SI 
to her, the less affluent toi 
well be somewhere in Gec 
know that in the back 
whispering. 
What's a guy with that 
out west? The women arour 
Extortion? 
The kid's fourteen. Whu 
Have you seen the sho-
things we've never dreamed 
No, Pagan thinks. This 
She's the one who's goi 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 8 
a police officer Michele Pagan 
lary's stepmother. 
'm going to have to ask you to 
ig more until I speak with my 
Lt I'd urge you to come in. Let us 
T the rest of the day. We're on 
does most of the talking. 
says. ""At school. A fight between 
tase understand, our Mary's not 
22 
Officer Pagan's starting to feel as though she's swimming in 
uncharted waters. She's young, and the cases she's worked before 
this have been minor. Robberies, that sort of thing. Pagan's not 
used to the Gold Coast. She was educated in New York City, and, 
to her, the less affluent towns further in from the Coast might as 
well be somewhere in Georgia. Then again, she knows enough to 
know that in the back of the station, detectives are already 
whispering. 
What's a guy with that kind of money need with some girl from 
out west? The women around here could make a man cry. 
Extortion? 
The kid's fourteen. What would she know from extortion? 
Have you seen the shows these kids watch? They know about 
things we've never dreamed about. 
No, Pagan thinks. This is her case. 
She's the one who's going to work it. 
23 
CHAPTER 9 
Mary: March 2005 
ary's father and stepmother believe their girl. Officer 
Pagan believes Mary's parents. Ergo, Mary must be tell-
ing the truth. The girl's got a sweet, high, halting voice. 
Pagan interviews her twice, and both times, she speaks with her 
chin buried deep in her chest. 
""Tell me, honey,"" says Pagan. ""What happened?"" 
In her notepad, Michele Pagan writes: While speaking to me, 
Mary became upset and started to cry. 
""This white-haired guy came into the room,"" Mary says. 
""Wearing only a towel around his waist. He took off the towel. 
And then he was all naked, and he lay down on a massage table. 
""He was a really built guy. But his wee-wee was very tiny."" 
Mary tells Pagan that Epstein spoke only to give her instruc-
tions, which he did in a stern voice. She tells Pagan that she was 
alone and didn't know what to do. 
24 
She removed her par 
writes in her incident rei 
She straddled his ba 
touching Epstein's expose( 
Epstein then turned tc 
up-and-down motion. Eps 
to massage Mary's vagina 
Mary's sure that Epst 
himself down as he got c 
That week, Pagan's as. 
tives. Five men, two won 
say. ""This is different fro 
tor is a smart person, arm 
Within days, another 
a similar story. 
It's a tricky case, accordil 
investigation, because thi 
as bait in an attempt to cat 
even if they were willin 
strings that Chief Reiter's 
Two weeks later, on is, 
a controlled call to Wend. 
The first attempt goes 
The next time Mary c 
On the recordings m 
tiny and tentative, whil( 
grown, like the femme fat 
""Hey, what's up?"" she 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 9 
,ther believe their girl. Officer 
arents. Ergo, Mary must be tell-
got a sweet, high, halting voice. 
Doth times, she speaks with her 
""What happened?"" 
in writes: While speaking to me, 
cry. 
ne into the room,"" Mary says. 
As waist. He took off the towel. 
he lay down on a massage table. 
at his wee-wee was very tiny."" 
n spoke only to give her instruc-
>ice. She tells Pagan that she was 
10. 
24 
She removed her pants, leaving her thong panties on, Pagan 
writes in her incident report. 
She straddled his back, whereby her exposed buttocks were 
touching Epstein's exposed buttocks. 
Epstein then turned to his side and started to rub his penis in an 
up-and-down motion. Epstein pulled out a purple vibrator and began 
to massage Mary's vaginal area. 
Mary's sure that Epstein ejaculated. ""He used a towel to wipe 
himself down as he got off the table,"" she says. 
That week, Pagan's assigned to the case, along with six detec-
tives. Five men, two women. ""A predator case,"" one of them will 
say. ""This is different from someone who is stealing. This preda-
tor is a smart person, and that's his desire. He can't stop."" 
Within days, another victim comes into the station. She's got 
a similar story. 
It's a tricky case, according to a source closely involved with the 
investigation, because the girls involved are far too young to use 
as bait in an attempt to catch Epstein committing another crime — 
even if they were willing to play along. Still, there are other 
strings that Chief Reiter's team can start pulling. 
Two weeks later, on March 31, Officer Pagan has Mary make 
a controlled call to Wendy Dobbs. 
The first attempt goes straight to voice mail. 
The next time Mary calls, Wendy picks up. 
On the recordings made by Officer Pagan, Mary's voice is 
tiny and tentative, while Wendy sounds mature, gruff, fully 
grown, like the femme fatale in some old black-and-white movie. 
""Hey, what's up?"" she says impatiently. 
25 
JAMES PATTERSON 
""Nothing,"" says Mary. 
""I talked to Jeffrey, and I'm going to his house tomorrow 
morning,"" says Wendy. ""I'm going to set something up for you."" 
""Cool. Like, what do you think?"" 
""I don't know. I'm going to talk to him tomorrow morning 
when I go to his house about it."" 
""Urn, how much would I get paid?"" 
""Talk to him. I'll talk to him tomorrow, and then I'll bring 
you in the next day. You can talk to him about it."" 
So far, so good, thinks Officer Pagan. But she needs more. She 
looks at Mary expectantly, but not too expectantly, she hopes. She 
can imagine how hard it must be for the girl. Or maybe she can't 
imagine it at all. But either way, Mary seems to have gotten the 
message. Straightening up in her chair, she begins to press Wendy. 
""I don't know,"" Wendy says in response. ""I don't know. You're 
going to have to talk to him about it. I mean, I don't really work for 
him like that. I just bring girls to him and they work for him.. .. You 
can ask him, like, 'What can I do to make more money?"" 
Mary keeps pressing. 
""The more you do, the more you get paid,"" Wendy says finally. 
""Want me to bring my sister for you? So that we can get paid 
more or something?"" 
""Well, yeah. That's what I'm saying. I'm working tomorrow, 
and me and him are going to put a schedule together for you and 
your sister. So I'll call you tomorrow when I leave Jeffrey with a 
schedule."" 
""Okay, well, I don't have a phone. So if you guys call me, I'd 
have to know what time so I could get the phone."" 
""Okay. I'll leave you a message. That's fine. I'll leave you a 
message."" 
26 
Noel St. Pierre: Mar 
Noel St. Pierre* 
Haiti. His old 1 
jungle border 
Republic, and some of I 
kids would stay in the E 
of them never returned. 
say too much about it. 
Most of them didn't 
By the time he wa5 
those kids. He'd leanr 
prostitutes. 
This was how Noel 
really were devils out ii 
* Noel St. Pierre is a compo: 
RSON 
ding to his house tomorrow 
o set something up for you."" 
))7 
k to him tomorrow morning 
id?"" 
:.omorrow, and then I'll bring 
d him about it."" 
agan. But she needs more. She 
Do expectantly, she hopes. She 
or the girl. Or maybe she can't 
4ary seems to have gotten the 
lair, she begins to press Wendy. 
response. ""I don't know. You're 
•t. I mean, I don't really work for 
in and they work for him.. . . You 
D make more money?"" 
yu get paid,"" Wendy says finally. 
Or you? So that we can get paid 
saying. I'm working tomorrow, 
a schedule together for you and 
row when I leave Jeffrey with a 
lone. So if you guys call me, I'd 
id get the phone."" 
age. That's fine. I'll leave you a 
6 
CHAPTER JO 
Noel St. Pierre: March 2005 
Noel St. Pierre* thinks of the kids he grew up with in 
Haiti. His old neighborhood was pressed up against the 
jungle border that Haiti shares with the Dominican 
Republic, and some of the kids he knew would slip over. Those 
kids would stay in the DR for a few days, sometimes weeks. Some 
of them never returned. But the ones who did come back wouldn't 
say too much about it. 
Most of them didn't talk much at all. 
By the time he was ten, Noel had learned the truth about 
those kids. He'd learned that they'd ended up working as 
prostitutes. 
This was how Noel St. Pierre had learned about evil. There 
really were devils out in the world. Flesh-and-blood devils, and 
* Noel St. Pierre is a composite character. 
27 
JAMES PATTERSON 
they were nothing like the demons he'd heard about in church. 
Noel had never forgotten the way those kids looked. The way 
they'd turned into old men and old women. They were like zom-
bies trapped in children's bodies. And now, in America, Noel's 
been given a chance to help other kids. 
That's what the police have told him, at least. 
Noel is a sanitation worker. Still strong at fifty, and lucky 
enough to have found his way to Palm Beach, he gets in to work 
before anyone else and keeps his white compactor truck clean, 
almost glistening. His pickup route runs hot and cold with the 
seasons. But even in the summer, with much less to do, he's on 
the job early, braced for a six-hour shift that would break a lesser 
man's back. In the winter, the job gets even harder. The Estate 
Section gets especially busy. Some of the parties have hundreds 
of guests. They leave behind mountains of refuse. That garbage 
gets picked up daily, or twice a day when requested. It's carried 
by workers who slip, silently, under the porte cocheres. Then it 
gets whisked twenty miles away to a landfill that the garbage-
men call Mount Trashmore. 
Noel's stretch of the Estate Section runs from the Everglades 
Club to the southernmost tip of the island. It encompasses Ban-
yan Road, Jungle Road, El Bravo Way, and El Brill° Way. His per-
formance record is spotless. As far as the Palm Beach PD is 
concerned, he's the perfect man for the job. 
Chief Reiter's authorized a ""trash pull"" —a legal way to collect 
discarded evidence. In this case, evidence culled from Jeffrey 
Epstein's garbage. But when the police call him, Noel St. Pierre 
simply assumes that another refugee boat has run aground on 
28 
the beach. A sad thing 
time to time. His home 
despots who line their 
Many of the refugee: 
Most of them speak 
""Eske ou ka ede nou, 
""Can you help us, pl 
The cops always ne€ 
help out before. But thi: 
impatient. 
""This time is differ, 
special. You don't have 
keep things to yourself, 
When he hears what 
""I'll do it,"" he says if
address he's been 
morning, St. Pierre mov( 
kitchen window at the 
women, one of them qui 
The fourth silhouett€ 
The police have giv( 
unsavory, but so is the 
detectives want from hi 
numbers, along with toc 
wear. Anything that cou 
special truck on the El E 
aside in small trash bags 
end of every shift. 
RSON 
FILTHY RICH 
1 
he'd heard about in church. 
those kids looked. The way 
women. They were like zom-
knd now, in America, Noel's 
ids. 
him, at least. 
:ill strong at fifty, and lucky 
aim Beach, he gets in to work 
khite compactor truck clean, 
.e runs hot and cold with the 
with much less to do, he's on 
shift that would break a lesser 
gets even harder. The Estate 
: of the parties have hundreds 
ntains of refuse. That garbage 
ty when requested. It's carried 
ier the porte cocheres. Then it 
to a landfill that the garbage-
:don runs from the Everglades 
he island. It encompasses Ban-
Vay, and El Brillo Way. His per-
far as the Palm Beach PD is 
N the job. 
h pull"" — a legal way to collect 
evidence culled from Jeffrey 
police call him, Noel St. Pierre 
fugee boat has run aground on 
8 
the beach. A sad thing, but something that does happen from 
time to time. His homeland, Haiti, is desperately poor. Run by 
despots who line their pockets while everyday people suffer. 
Many of the refugees are illiterate. 
Most of them speak only Creole. 
""Eske ou ha ede nou, souple,"" they ask. 
""Can you help us, please?"" 
The cops always need a translator, and Noel's been asked to 
help out before. But this time the police officer's voice is raspy, 
impatient. 
""This time is different,"" the officer says. ""Something very 
special. You don't have to accept. But if you do, you'll have to 
keep things to yourself, completely."" 
When he hears what the story is, Noel accepts. 
""I'll do it,"" he says immediately. 
The address he's been given is 358 El Brillo Way. On his first 
morning, St. Pierre moves swiftly, sneaking a glance through the 
kitchen window at the four silhouettes standing inside. Three 
women, one of them quite short, with pigtails. 
The fourth silhouette is that of a tall man. 
The police have given him clear instructions. The work is 
unsavory, but so is the work Noel does every day. What the 
detectives want from him now are slips of paper with phone 
numbers, along with toothbrushes, condoms, discarded under-
wear. Anything that could provide DNA. He's been told to use a 
special truck on the El Brillo run. Whatever he finds he's to put 
aside in small trash bags he'll deliver directly to the station at the 
end of every shift. 
29 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Jeffrey Epstein's garbage will never arrive at Mount Trashmore. 
As he drives to the police station, St. Pierre thinks about 
Epstein and what he's been told. It's a wonder to him that Ameri-
can kids would do what the police say these kids have done. 
American kids are rich, after all. Some of them just don't know it, 
he guesses. 
Americans always want more than they have. 
Then again, children do stupid things. They don't know any 
better. And St. Pierre's trips to the house make one thing clear. 
These girls are young. Really young. 
""I hope you can stop this man,"" St. Pierre tells the cop. 
The detective shoots him a sharp look, and St. Pierre nods. 
""Please,"" he says, more softly this time. 
""Can we count on seeing you here tomorrow?"" 
The detective looks antsy, impatient again. In his hand he's 
holding a scrap of paper that Noel St. Pierre has pulled from 
Epstein's trash. Wendy Dobbs's name is on it. Mary's name is on 
it as well. 
The detective can't wait to get it to Chief Reiter's office. 
""As long as it takes, sir,"" St. Pierre tells him. ""Tomorrow, the 
next day. Whenever you need me."" 
30 
Michael Reiter: Sep, 
There's a sense ir 
foundation. Fre 
residents will w 
How much more wot 
remarkably safe commi 
A tax write-off? Su. 
genuine gesture. One e 
the department's effort 
ciously, gratefully. In 2 
Jeffrey Epstein— the ! 
Beach PD — for ninety 
generous standards of 
delivered personally, NN 
ulator. But that day Mic 
off about Epstein. 
;.RSON 
er arrive at Mount Trashmore. 
Lion, St. Pierre thinks about 
; a wonder to him that Amer--
:e say these kids have done. 
ome of them just don't know it, 
han they have. 
. things. They don't know any 
house make one thing clear. 
g. 
St. Pierre tells the cop. 
rp look, and St. Pierre nods. 
his time. 
iere tomorrow?"" 
patient again. In his hand he's 
)el St. Pierre has pulled from 
ime is on it. Mary's name is on 
it to Chief Reiter's office. 
[erre tells him. ""Tomorrow, the 
77 
0 
CHAPTER II 
Michael Reiter: September 2005 
There's a sense in which the Palm Beach PD functions as a 
foundation. From time to time, one of the town's wealthy 
residents will walk in with a check followed by an inquiry. 
How much more would the police force need to make this 
remarkably safe community feel even safer? 
A tax write-off? Sure. But why not? Coming from most, it's a 
genuine gesture. One of appreciation for all they have and for all 
the department's efforts to guard it. Donations are accepted gra-
ciously, gratefully. In 2004, the department had taken one from 
Jeffrey Epstein—the second donation he'd made to the Palm 
Beach PD—for ninety thousand dollars. Generous, even by the 
generous standards of Palm Beach. The donation, which Epstein 
delivered personally, was earmarked for a firearms training sim-
ulator. But that day Michael Reiter had thought something seemed 
off about Epstein. 
31 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Something an old cop would notice. 
Reiter's officers had told him about complaints they'd gotten 
a few months earlier—young women hanging around at the end 
of the block or coming and going at all hours from Epstein's 
house. ""There was some follow-up to that,"" Reiter said in a depo-
sition for B.B. vs. Epstein, a civil suit, brought by a victim, that 
Jeffrey eventually settled. ""I think we may have encountered one 
or two of them. [We] may have done a little bit of surveillance or 
talked to neighbors as to whether or not they had seen that. I 
think we were of the general understanding that, yes, there were 
very attractive young women coming and going from Mr. 
Epstein's residence. 
""We did some level of further inquiry, and we were of the 
belief that they were all adults. And [we] were also of the belief 
that there was a possibility that there could be prostitution. But I 
mean that's just not something that we heavily pursued—
prostitution in private residences; it's common everywhere in 
America. We didn't believe that they were underage at that point, 
and so we had no further interest in it."" 
Reiter had recalled those complaints on the day Epstein had 
shown up with his $90,000 donation. And when Reiter had 
walked Epstein downstairs, he couldn't help but notice the tall, 
beautiful woman whom Epstein had brought with him to the 
station. 
It struck him as strange that she was standing so stiffly, eyes 
cast downward, as though she were afraid to speak. Not a kid. 
But not a woman, either. Epstein did not introduce or even 
acknowledge her. To Reiter, this, too, seemed odd. 
Indeed, the statuesque woman was Nadia Marcinkova, a 
32 
nineteen-year-old be 
described, by anothe 
tive Recarey, as one o 
In September, seven 
calls Reiter directly 
arms simulator yet? 
Cautiously, Reiter 
If the departmen 
happy to provide the) 
Reiter thanks hir 
now that Epstein kric 
Epstein's crimes in P 
knows, if the charge 
public. 
Cops like Reiter 
that they're no longe) 
helps to hold on to a 
to understand: you s, 
murders make a kin( 
tion. There's great so 
Epstein's been up to 
Who is this guy? 
Reiter's detective. 
him, they'll have to 1 
to know the people ; 
Wendy. That's one pl 
What kind of per. 
ERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
)tice. 
pout complaints they'd gotten 
Len hanging around at the end 
g at all hours from Epstein's 
to that,"" Reiter said in a depo-
lift, brought by a victim, that 
we may have encountered one 
ne a little bit of surveillance or 
r or not they had seen that. I 
Tstanding that, yes, there were 
:oming and going from Mr. 
:r inquiry, and we were of the 
Lnd [we] were also of the belief 
-iere could be prostitution. But I 
g that we heavily pursued—
.',s; it's common everywhere in 
hey were underage at that point, 
t in it."" 
aplaints on the day Epstein had 
Dnation. And when Reiter had 
:ouldn't help but notice the tall, 
a had brought with him to the 
she was standing so stiffly, eyes 
were afraid to speak. Not a kid. 
tein did not introduce or even 
>, too, seemed odd. 
,man was Nadia Marcinkova, a 
32 
nineteen-year-old beauty who lived at Epstein's home and was 
described, by another girl, in a recorded interview with Detec-
tive Recarey, as one of Epstein's ""like, slaves."" 
In September, several months into the investigation, Epstein 
calls Reiter directly and asks: Has Palm Beach bought the fire-
arms simulator yet? 
Cautiously, Reiter tells him that they're still doing research. 
If the department needs more funds, Epstein says, he'll be 
happy to provide them. 
Reiter thanks him graciously and hangs up. But he's certain 
now that Epstein knows about the investigation. Thinking about 
Epstein's crimes in Palm Beach makes him shudder. And, Reiter 
knows, if the charges are true, things are going to get ugly and 
public. 
Cops like Reiter are family men, fathers. Some see so much 
that they're no longer surprised by the ways of the world. Still, it 
helps to hold on to a natural capacity for outrage. Thefts are easy 
to understand: you see something you need, so you take it. Even 
murders make a kind of sense once you understand the motiva-
tion. There's great satisfaction in catching a murderer. But what 
Epstein's been up to is hard to explain. 
Who is this guy? 
Reiter's detectives will have to get into Epstein's head. To nail 
him, they'll have to know him. And to do that, they'll have to get 
to know the people around him. The police already know about 
Wendy. That's one procurer, but out of how many? 
What kind of person would bring children to a child molester? 
33 
JAMES PATTERSON 
And—Reiter can't shake the idea—other victims had to be 
out there. That lined up with what Epstein's neighbor reported: 
there were many girls. He needed to find them as quickly as pos-
sible. It was a race against time. 
As long as Epstein was free in Palm Beach, more girls were 
sure to arrive at the side of the house on El Brillo Way. 
Alison: September 1] 
/t might start with th•covers charity balls, 1 
Reporters there woul 
so juicy. On top of that, ( 
freelance paparazzi and : 
They'd kill for the stc 
Heat. 
Over at WPTV, the 
one day. 
It's a tip from a kid, sc 
from a local high school. 
There's a prostitution 
The tip gets brought 
the producers divvy up 
newscasts. 
34 
ERSON 
lea—other victims had to be 
t Epstein's neighbor reported: 
o find them as quickly as pos-
Palm Beach, more girls were 
tse on El Brillo Way. 
CHAPTER 12 
Alison: September 11, 2005 
It might start with the Palm Beach Daily News, which usually 
covers charity balls, equestrian events, and gallery openings. 
Reporters there would kill to sink their teeth into something 
so juicy. On top of that, Chief Reiter knows, Palm Beach is full of 
freelance paparazzi and seasoned semiretired journalists. 
They'd kill for the story, too. For them, it'd be a real-life Body 
Heat. 
Over at WPTV, the local NBC affiliate, the phone rings 
one day. 
It's a tip from a kid, sounding nervous. Something about girls 
from a local high school. 
There's a prostitution ring out in Palm Beach, says the boy. 
The tip gets brought up in a midmorning meeting at which 
the producers divvy up ideas among the various reporters and 
newscasts. 
35 
34 
JAMES PATTERSON 
""Where, exactly?"" a producer asks. 
""He didn't say, exactly,"" an intern replies. ""He said that a very 
rich man was involved."" 
""Who?"" 
""Didn't say."" 
""Did he leave a call-back number?"" 
""No. The kid sounded really young. Fourteen, fifteen years 
old."" 
The producer thinks for a moment, makes a few scratches in 
his dog-eared notepad. 
""Okay,"" he says. ""I'm not sure what we can do with that for 
the moment."" 
At some point, some enterprising journalist will put enough 
pieces together to get a sense of the picture. Sooner or later, 
someone will talk. Maybe a parent. Maybe a cop's girlfriend gets 
giddy at lunch. The girlfriend's girlfriend mentions it to her hus-
band, who says something to a golfing buddy in turn. Maybe the 
golfing buddy knows a reporter. 
Or maybe some lawyer goes off the rez, blitzed off those mar-
tinis they serve at the Palm Beach Grill. 
Sooner or later, there's always talk. At that point, Chief Reit-
er's job will get much, much harder —with Epstein on one side, 
the press on the other, and the chief taking flak from all sides. 
But right now, two months into Reiter's investigation, the press 
is still speaking in whispers. 
Right now, Reiter wants to keep it that way. 
And, in the meantime, new pieces of the puzzle keep falling 
into place. 
* * * 
36 
On September II, 
over by the police: 
The patrol officer] 
vehicle. But Alison 
she's cocky and 
from the dime bag 
remarkable story a 
ties with high sch( 
says. She's been g( 
was sixteen. 
At first the cop 
gation into Jeffrey 
burnout. But back 
been bullshitting I 
The investigati 
Alison's name e 
that have been pul 
a misdemeanor, si 
Chief Reiter's colle 
Jeffrey Epstein. 
The story Ails( 
Like Mary, sh( 
tells cops that Ep: 
although, she susr 
Recarey takes 
(transcribed from 
police), D stands 
""victim."" 
* Alison's name, som( 
FILTHY RICH 
ERSON 
sks. 
:n replies. ""He said that a very 
)er?"" 
y.oung. Fourteen, fifteen years 
nent, makes a few scratches in 
what we can do with that for . 
sing journalist will put enough 
if the picture. Sooner or later, 
it. Maybe a cop's girlfriend gets 
ilfriend mentions it to her hus-
)1fing buddy in turn. Maybe the 
)ff the rez, blitzed off those mar-
h Grill. 
s talk. At that point, Chief Reit-
.der —with Epstein on one side, 
chief taking flak from all sides. 
Reiter's investigation, the press 
•eep it that way. 
pieces of the puzzle keep falling 
36 
On September 11, a young woman named Alison gets pulled 
over by the police.* She's carrying a small amount of marijuana. 
The patrol officer handcuffs her and puts her in the back of his 
vehicle. But Alison's been in the back of a police car before, and 
she's cocky and canny enough to pivot the conversation away 
from the dime bag she's been busted with. She tells the officer a 
remarkable story about an older man engaging in sexual activi-
ties with high school girls. Alison knows about it firsthand, she 
says. She's been going to the house on El Brillo Way since she 
was sixteen. 
At first the cop's skeptical. He hasn't heard about the investi-
gation into Jeffrey Epstein's affairs. And, after all, Alison is a 
burnout. But back at the station, he finds out that Alison has not 
been bullshitting him. 
The investigation is real. 
Alison's name and cell phone number match up with messages 
that have been pulled from Epstein's trash. Instead of copping to 
a misdemeanor, she becomes another Jane Doe in the case that 
Chief Reiter's colleague, Detective Joe Recarey, is building against 
Jeffrey Epstein. 
The story Alison ends up telling is extremely disturbing. 
Like Mary, she says, she was recruited in high school. She 
tells cops that Epstein would call her his ""number one girl"" — 
although, she suspects, there were many others. 
Recarey takes her statement. In the excerpts that follow 
(transcribed from a tape recording made by the Palm Beach 
police), D stands for ""Detective Recarey,"" and V stands for 
""victim."" 
* Alison's name, some identifying details, and dialogue have been changed. 
37 
D: 
V: 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Well, ah, start from, like, how you met him, and then I'll — 
I'll take you through. 
Okay. Um, we [Alison and a female friend] worked at Hollister 
together in the Wellington Green mall, and I was mentioning 
to her how I wanted extra money to go to Maine ...I wanted to 
go camping for the summer, and I couldn't afford a plane 
ticket. And—she goes, ""Oh, well, you can get a plane ticket in 
two hours."" I said, ""What are you talking about?"" Like, what 
are you—that didn't make any sense to me, a plane ticket in 
two hours; what are you talking about? And she goes, ""Oh, we 
can go give this guy a massage, and, um, he'll pay two hundred 
dollars for, like, forty-five minutes or an hour."" And that's all 
she told me—no details, no nothing. 
She said that he wanted cute girls, so I looked cute, did my 
best. I didn't—I didn't think that it was what it was. I wasn't 
naive enough to think that he was gonna pay me two hun-
dred dollars just for nothing—I, I don't know, like, I don't 
know what was going through my head. I absolutely don't 
know. And I— the back of my mind was thinking, oh, well, 
it could be legitimate, but I was also thinking, you know, at 
the same time, is she fucking crazy? Like, this guy's not 
gonna pay you money for not doing anything, not letting him 
cop a feel or nothing. You know? So I didn't know what to 
think, I was like, ""Oh ... if he does something that I have a 
problem with, then I'll leave."" 
D: Who were you introduced to? 
V: One of his girlfriends. One of his, like, slaves that he has live 
with him. And when I say ""slaves,"" like, one of the girls that 
38 
he bought to, like, 
to one of them pro 
Sarah. Urn, that's hi 
but I don't know. Ur 
and she's the one v 
second. And from 
really—I didn't pa: 
So ... we were waiti 
um, Jeffrey comes 
He just introduced 
'cause I was pissed 
was pissed off. He 
and says, ""Thank )7( 
stairs,"" and I was lii 
And that's how I wa 
Urn. Hold on—I'm 
head. I wore a skin 
wore a skirt and ju5 
his legs, and he ask' 
think I said no at f 
showing"" — he tall< 
you're not showing 
even know. So I en 
goes— well, I thint 
top of me. So —and 
D: When you're sayir 
breasts? 
V: Yeah. And then he a 
my shirt, but I kepi 
ERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
you met him, and then I'll—
ale friend] worked at Hollister 
m mall, and I was mentioning 
:y to go to Maine...I wanted to 
and I couldn't afford a plane 
Al, you can get a plane ticket in 
Tou talking about?"" Like, what 
1 sense to me, a plane ticket in 
g about? And she goes, ""Oh, we 
and, um, he'll pay two hundred 
utes or an hour."" And that's all 
)thing. 
girls, so I looked cute, did my 
that it was what it was. I wasn't 
le was gonna pay me two hun-
I don't know, like, I don't 
igh my head. I absolutely don't 
iy mind was thinking, oh, well, 
was also thinking, you know, at 
ing crazy? Like, this guy's not 
t doing anything, not letting him 
mow? So I didn't know what to 
he does something that I have a 
1) 
o? 
of his, like, slaves that he has live 
'slaves,"" like, one of the girls that 
38 
D: 
V: 
he bought to, like, have sex with him. Urn, I was introduced 
to one of them probably, like ... Sarah. I was introduced to 
Sarah. Urn, that's his assistant, I think. I think they have sex, 
but I don't know. Um, I was introduced to his assistant Sarah, 
and she's the one who told me that he would be ready in a 
second. And from there I met various other girls. I don't 
really—I didn't pay attention to who they were, though.... 
So ... we were waiting on the couch in the bathroom, and, 
urn, Jeffrey comes up, and he's like, ""Hey, I'm—I'm Jeffrey."" 
He just introduced himself, and he hands—I remember this 
'cause I was pissed off that she got paid to bring me. Like, I 
was pissed off. He hands her a wad of hundred-dollar bills 
and says, ""Thank you,"" and she says, ""I'll wait for you down-
stairs,"" and I was like, ""All right, I'll see you in a little while."" 
And that's how I was brought to Jeffrey. 
Urn. Hold on—I'm remembering. I'm, like, picturing in my 
head. I wore a skirt. I remember specifically what I wore: I 
wore a skirt and just a regular T-shirt. And I was massaging 
his legs, and he asked me to take off my skirt. And I said—I 
think I said no at first. And he's like, ""Come on, you're not 
showing"" —he talked me into it, basically. He's like, ""Oh, 
you're not showing anything,"" or [he] did something; I don't 
even know. So I ended up taking off my skirt, and then he 
goes—well, I think he just started touching, you know, the 
top of me. So—and then he asked me. 
When you're saying ""the top of you,"" you mean your 
breasts? 
Yeah. And then he asked me to take off my shirt. So I took off 
my shirt, but I kept my underwear on. And I wouldn't take 
39 
JAMES PATTERSON 
my underwear off: I told him no. And he still paid me the 
same amount. And that was that. I went home. 
D: So, in other words, he — 
V: Finished with himself and that was it. Yeah, he ejaculated. 
Specifically. 
D: That was the first time you went there? 
V: Mm-hmm. 
D: And—I know, take a deep breath, I know, I can see it in your 
eyes already. From then on, you went there multiple times? 
V: I had problems with it. [With] what happened the first time. 
But three hundred dollars for forty minutes—that was a lot 
for a sixteen-year-old girl making six bucks an hour. 
D: So you're saying you're sure you were sixteen now? 
V: Urn, I don't want to say I'm sure of my age. I was under seven-
teen, one hundred percent. 
D: Okay. Urn, when you—the first time you went, when he 
masturbated, did you see? 
V: [giggles] 
D: His member? 
V: Oh, I thought you were going to ask me if I saw, like, his come. 
D: No. 
V: I saw all of the above. 
D: You saw him naked, fully naked? Fully naked? 
V: Yeah, a hundred percent naked. He had a towel on for some 
of it, but that doesn't mean anything. Like, he was naked. 
D: He took off the towel? 
V: I saw everything, yeah. 
40 
I mean, I'm sorry, 
cised, a hundred a 
has some sort of bii 
it is [giggles]; I've n 
done anything whi 
it—out of the who 
his penis. Like, he-
but I've never ever I 
or ""I'm gonna do tF 
I don't know—do) 
I'm just really emb 
drop of water. It's r 
top, where it's attac 
Like, I just could t€ 
can obviously tell i: 
he wasn't. 
D: The next time you 
escalate more? 
Mm-hmm. I actuall: 
me to start workirq 
went there. But I sta 
he was in the coun 
him that I wouldn't 
was my rule. Nothir 
ing, absolutely noth 
three or four hundr, 
Um, I still never—I 
entire time I never, 
ERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
no. And he still paid me the 
it. I went home. 
it was it. Yeah, he ejaculated. 
at there? 
ath, I know, I can see it in your 
)11 went there multiple times? 
I what happened the first time. 
forty minutes—that was a lot 
cing six bucks an hour. 
au were sixteen now? 
re of my age. I was under seven-
first time you went, when he 
, to ask me if I saw, like, his come. 
iked? Fully naked? 
ked. He had a towel on for some 
inything. Like, he was naked. 
40 
I mean, I'm sorry, he is circumcised, my bad. He's circum-
cised, a hundred and ten percent sure. A matter of fact, he 
has some sort of birth defect. On his thing. I don't know what 
it is [giggles]; I've never really looked at it, because I've never 
done anything where I had to touch it. I've never touched 
it— out of the whole time I worked for him, I never touched 
his penis. Like, he—I'm pretty sure he rubbed it against me, 
but I've never ever been, like, ""Okay, I'm letting you do this"" 
or ""I'm gonna do this to you."" Um, it's really weirdly shaped. 
I don't know— do you want me to, like, tell you this? 
I'm just really embarrassed. Urn, it's like a teardrop, like a 
drop of water. It's really fat at the bottom and skinny at the 
top, where it's attached. And he never gets fully hard, ever. 
Like, I just could tell by looking at it—like, by looking you 
can obviously tell if you're hard or not, and I could tell that 
he wasn't. 
D: The next time you went, or as you continued to go, did it 
escalate more? 
V. Mm-hmm. I actually—I don't remember how long it took for 
me to start working for him regularly, from the first time I 
went there. But I started working every day. Every single day 
he was in the country I would be there ... And, urn, I told 
him that I wouldn't let him put anything inside of me; that 
was my rule. Nothing inside of me—no fingers, no, no noth-
ing, absolutely nothing inside of me. He increased my pay to 
three or four hundred dollars as long as he could touch me. 
Um, I still never—I, I swear I never touched him, the whole 
t, entire time I never, ever touched him. Urn, but he, he-
41 
JAMES PATTERSON 
D: How many times would you say you went? 
V: Hundreds. Hundreds. I was—he used to tell me I was his 
favorite. He bought me a car. He bought me — 
D: This Jeep that you're driving? 
V: No. I had a brand-new Dodge Neon. I got a plane—I got a 
plane ticket to New York; I got spending money whenever I 
wanted. Like, I was in there deep. I was—he asked my par-
ents to emancipate me so I could live with him. Or he didn't 
ask my parents, he asked me to ask my parents, I'm sorry. He 
actually wanted me to come live with him. 
D: As, like, a girlfriend? 
V: Sex slave, whatever you want to call it. Yeah. Urn, but it 
escalated—he, he just increased my pay, as long as he could 
touch me. I wouldn't let him put anything inside of me. And 
then one day he just did, one day he just put his hand, like, 
his fingers—and, urn... 
D: How long, would you say, from the very first time you went? 
V: Months. Honestly, I never kept track, like, of, of what happened 
when. I just can tell you in which order things progressed. 
It was—it was, like, towards the middle and end of my 
school year. But I remember that for the last, like, six or eight 
weeks of high school, I didn't have a car 'cause I gave it back 
to him. Because he—he asked me to have sex with him and, 
like, like suck him and stuff [giggles], and I was just like, no. 
Definitely not. I was like, ""I'll let you touch me, but I'm not 
gonna do that."" 
Yeah, the car was a Dodge Neon 2005. He got it for me before 
the New Year, because I remember I got it—it was an edition 
42 
D: 
V: 
D: 
D: 
V: 
D: 
that was a year befc 
got it, I obviously , 
got a 2005 Neon in 
car was awesome [: 
I gave it back befor, 
for me. He wanted 
wanna — I didn't w 
have sex with him. 
to walk away from] 
that. And I'm glad t 
But I lied to him wF 
bridges, because h, 
Spectacular. Even i 
him. Until this day. 
to him in, like, a co 
would give me as rri 
know that I hate hi 
figured he used me 
that, but I figured if 
Okay. Let me bring 
Sure. 
When did things st 
when the massages 
They escalated wh( 
stand the question. 
Okay. The first time 
Are you asking for a 
Oh, no, no, no—
EERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
ty you went? 
—he used to tell me I was his 
ie bought me—
Neon. I got a plane—I got a 
ot spending money whenever I 
leep. I was—he asked my par-
)uld live with him. Or he didn't 
to ask my parents, I'm sorry. He 
ive with him. 
,nt to call it. Yeah. Urn, but it 
ased my pay, as long as he could 
put anything inside of me. And 
.e day he just put his hand, like, 
pm the very first time you went? 
)t track, like, of, of what happened 
hich order things progressed. 
trds the middle and end of my 
that for the last, like, six or eight 
n't have a car 'cause I gave it back 
ked me to have sex with him and, 
[giggles], and I was just like, no. 
let you touch me, but I'm not 
Neon 2005. He got it for me before 
member I got it—it was an edition 
42 
that was a year before they were supposed to come out. So if I 
got it, I obviously didn't get a 2006, 'cause that's this year. I 
got a 2005 Neon in 2004. Seven miles on it when I got it. The 
car was awesome [giggles]. 
I gave it back before I graduated. It got too—it got too sticky 
for me. He wanted more than I was willing to give. I didn't 
wanna — I didn't want to, um, suck his dick. I didn't want to 
have sex with him. I never did that, and I wanted to be able 
to walk away from this saying that I—saying that I never did 
that. And I'm glad that I did. 
But I lied to him when I gave it back. I didn't want to burn my 
bridges, because he was a spectacular connection to have. 
Spectacular. Even if I didn't—even when I didn't work for 
him. Until this day, he is so aw— he is so—I haven't talked 
to him in, like, a couple months, but if I called him today he 
would give me as much money as I asked him for. He doesn't 
know that I hate him the way I do. I kept that connection. I 
figured he used me, I'd be able to use him. Urn, I hate to say 
that, but I figured if I wanted to use him I could. 
D: Okay. Let me bring you back a little bit. 
V: Sure. 
D: When did things start to escalate as far as things happening 
when the massages were given? 
V: They escalated whenever he wanted. I don't clearly under-
stand the question. 
D: Okay. The first time you went, you were naked — 
V: Are you asking for a date? 
D: Oh, no, no, no-
43 
JAMES PATTERSON 
V: ... and the little steps that things progressed? 
D: Right. 
V: Well, I went and I wouldn't take off my panties at first. And 
then he got me to get naked. Then he got me to let him rub me. 
Then he got me to let him stick his fingers in me. Then he got 
me to let him go down on me. Then, um—that was pretty 
much the gist of it, except this one time, where he bent me over 
the table and put himself in me. Without my permission. And I 
flipped out. I'm sorry, I didn't ask you, but I don't count that as 
me having sex with him.... 'Cause I just told you that I never 
had sex with him. I never did. Even though, I don't know what 
you'd consider that. But he then—I go, ""What are you doing?"" 
He goes, ""Oh, I just wanted [redacted] to see this."" 
D: Okay. Let me back you up. When you were completely naked, 
the same things happened? You went in, you massaged him? 
V: Sometimes I didn't even do that. Sometimes he just asked me 
to take off my clothes and—he'd have to do work, he'd be 
sitting at his desk or something, and I'd just be naked there, 
watching television or reading a book, but I'd be naked. Or, 
um, sometimes he wanted to just watch TV or read, and he'd 
lay in his bed and ask me to take my clothes off and lay with 
him. And that's it. Not touch him or anything.... Sometimes 
he'd just invite me over for breakfast, for dinner, or just to 
use the swimming pool, and I'd get paid for that, too. I'd get 
paid just to hang out with him. That's it. And if the money 
wasn't there, I wouldn't have ever been in that house. 
D: Okay. When he started to touch you — 
V: I have a question. Before I say anything else. Urn, is there a 
possibility that I'm gonna have to go to court or anything? 
Like, that's a possibility, right? 
D: Well, here's the thin 
going to sit down, NA, 
he did to you is a cril 
V: Would you consider 
be rape, what he didi 
D: If he put himself insi 
V: I didn't say that, or ai 
is about, like, my hip 
D: That, that is a crime. 
V: I don't want my fan 
doesn't know any of t 
for two years, or how 
thinks I made phone 
ing my [unintelligibli 
know anything. 
D: Well, you're an adult 
done with this interv-
decide the best coursE 
V: 'Cause Jeffrey's gonm 
He's gonna find—he's 
I'm not safe now. You - 
D: He is not this person t 
V: Well — 
D: Why do you say you'r( 
before? 
V: Well, I've heard him m 
yeah. Of course. 
D: You're gonna die? You') 
V: All the above! But that 
D: Who's he talking to? 
FILTHY RICH 
ER SON 
gs progressed? 
ke off my panties at first. And 
len he got me to let him rub me. 
his fingers in me. Then he got 
ie. Then, urn—that was pretty 
one time, where he bent me over 
Without my permission. And I 
ask you, but I don't count that as 
.ause I just told you that I never 
Even though, I don't know what 
m —I go, ""What are you doing?"" 
dacted] to see this."" 
ben you were completely naked, 
(ou went in, you massaged him? 
hat. Sometimes he just asked me 
—he'd have to do work, he'd be 
king, and I'd just be naked there, 
Lng a book, but I'd be naked. Or, 
o just watch TV or read, and he'd 
take my clothes off and lay with 
h him or anything.... Sometimes 
breakfast, for dinner, or just to 
id I'd get paid for that, too. I'd get 
him. That's it. And if the money 
re ever been in that house. 
ouch you—
say anything else. Urn, is there a 
have to go to court or anything? 
ght? 
44 
D: Well, here's the thing: When this is all said and done, we're 
going to sit down, we're going to discuss this. I mean, what 
he did to you is a crime. I'm not gonna lie to you. 
V: Would you consider it rape? Like, would you consider that to 
be rape, what he did? 
I/ If he put himself inside you, without permission — 
V: I didn't say that, or anything. I was standing up and the table 
is about, like, my hip length—he just put me down — 
D: That, that is a crime. That is a crime. 
V: I don't want my family to find out about this. My family 
doesn't know any of this. My mom thinks I was his secretary, 
for two years, or however long—a year and a half. My mom 
thinks I made phone calls for him and that's how I was mak-
ing my [unintelligible] money. That's it. I don't want her to 
know anything. 
D: Well, you're an adult. You're an adult now.... When we're 
done with this interview, we'll discuss this further and we'll 
decide the best course. 
V: 'Cause Jeffrey's gonna get me. You guys realize that, right? 
He's gonna find—he's gonna figure this out. And he's gonna — 
I'm not safe now. You understand that, right? I'm not safe. 
D: He is not this person that he is portraying himself to be — 
V: Well — 
D: Why do you say you're not safe? Has he said he's hurt people 
before? 
V: Well, I've heard him make threats to people on the telephone, 
yeah. Of course. 
D: You're gonna die? You're gonna break your legs? Or — 
V: All the above! But that's not the point. 
D: Who's he talking to? 
45 
JAMES PATTERSON 
V: I don't know. I don't know, I heard those conversations, I 
mean, I've been in the room when he was on the phone and 
[unintelligible] threatened. Like, I witnessed lots of things. I 
just don't know what, specifically you all [want to know]. 
D: Everything. 
V: I used to go there every day, like I w —I don't, I don't know 
how many other girls he was saying, ""You're my favorite, and 
I want you to live with me"" to, but I was in about as deep as 
you can get. 
D: He had quite a few girls he would say that to. 
D: Do you have any formal massage training? 
V: [Giggles.] Hell, no. 
D: All right, I was just asking. 
V: He would kiss me and stuff, too. I remember that. And when 
he kissed me, if he was jerking off he would, like, rub him-
self on my breasts. And I ... I was extremely uncomfortable. I 
would maneuver myself away from that activity. I'd get up 
and I'd move somewhere else, or I'd—I don't even remember. 
I would stop whatever was going on without saying, ""Can 
you get the fuck off me?"" I would stop it without saying stuff 
like that. 
D: Okay. 
V: I wouldn't let him put anything in me until one day he did 
just out of nowhere. And I said, ""Wait a second: my boyfriend, 
you know, we had this thing, you can't do that. You know, 
I'm —I'm allowed to work here as long as you don't do that."" 
And he said ""okay."" Well, a couple months later I guess he 
46 
assumed me and my 
it one day; he just did 
I said, ""What are yo 
cool,"" and he goes, ""C 
I said, ""No, we did nc 
uh, and then he just c 
why don't I just give y 
out?"" And I was like 
no to. I don't know if. ; 
Oh, Yeah. Well, if ye 
tries to control the sit 
out of your mouth, i 
going to say. Like, ti 
money is knowing wF 
pie are gonna do. 
D: What did he tell you h 
V: Well, there's a coupi. 
myself, things I looke 
cally told me when I a 
brain scientist."" And I 
tist?"" I was like, ""Tha 
But anyway ... his expl 
people's brains work."" 
means. Whatever. You 
ble....1"" You know wfu 
held on so long is, he pi 
That I would get into 
waited, and I waited, al 
get 4.O—like, I did gre; 
fERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
D: 
V: 
. heard those conversations, I 
vhen he was on the phone and 
ke, I witnessed lots of things. I 
ally, you all [want to know]. 
like I w —I don't, I don't know 
saying, ""You're my favorite, and 
o, but I was in about as deep as 
ould say that to. 
sage training? 
too. I remember that. And when 
Ling off he would, like, rub him-
I was extremely uncomfortable. I 
vay from that activity. I'd get up 
;e, or I'd—I don't even remember. 
3 going on without saying, ""Can 
would stop it without saying stuff 
'thing in me until one day he did 
said, ""Wait a second: my boyfriend, 
Ling, you can't do that. You know, 
here as long as you don't do that.' 
, a couple months later I guess he 
46 
assumed me and my boyfriend had broken up, and he just did 
it one day; he just did it without asking or anything. And then 
I said, ""What are you doing?"" I said, ""You know that's not 
cool,"" and he goes, ""Oh, I thought we did that last time."" And 
I said, ""No, we did not do that last time."" And then he goes—
uh, and then he just offered me more money. He's like, ""Well, 
why don't I just give you something extra, and we can try this 
out?"" Arid I was like [sigh], ""All right."" Very hard guy to say 
no to. I don't know if. any of you guys ever talked to him.... 
Oh, yeah. Well, if you talk to him, I mean, he straight up 
tries to control the situation. Every—every word that comes 
out of your mouth, it seems like, he knows what you are 
going to say. Like, that's his job; that's how he made his 
money is knowing what people are gonna say and what peo-
ple are gonna do. 
What did he tell you he does for a living? 
Well, there's a couple of things. Things that I found for 
myself, things I looked up on the Internet. What he specifi-
cally told me when I asked him the first time was, ""Oh, I'm a 
brain scientist."" And I said, ""What the fuck is a brain scien-
tist?"" I was like, ""That's not a real job—tell me the truth."" 
But anyway ... his explanation was, ""It's my job to know how 
people's brains work."" And I said, ""Whatever the fuck that 
means. Whatever. You're like some old guy who [unintelligi-
ble... I"" You know what he promised me? Here's the reason I 
held on so long is, he promised me that I would get into NYU. 
That I would get into NYU and he would pay for it. And I 
waited, and I waited, and I scored great on my SATs, I would 
get 4.0—like, I did great in school. I filled out my application 
47 
JAMES PATTERSON 
D: 
V: 
D: 
V: 
and he told me that it wasn't good enough. So I filled it out 
again, and it was like three times. So I'm pretty sure he wasn't 
checking into it, he was just telling me that he was. But I 
think that had a lot to do with the reason I stayed there so 
long, 'cause my dream was right in front of me, you know? 
And it's so far.... 
Aside from having been with [redacted], 
else that you brought to the house? 
I brought a few people.... Because it got 
Like, everyone at school knew. You know 
It was a circle, and—
It was a little circle, yeah.... Not that I would want anybody 
to get involved. ... I brought girls I didn't like and, frankly, 
did not give a shit about. Girls that I knew were skanks. That 
would do anything. Girls that would just, like, suck dick in 
the bathroom at school. Like, not even people I was friends 
with. I'd just hear a rumor about a girl and be like, ""Hey, I 
know a way you can make two hundred dollars. How 
about ..."" I would tell them flat out, like, ""This is what you've 
got to do. Are you cool with this? 'Cause I'm not gonna take 
you if you're not."" So I told them. They all know that I got 
paid to bring them. It was actually [redactedl. She took off 
her shirt. She was a little overweight, so he didn't want any-
thing to do [with herb She was my best friend. But, you 
know, she was another story. I did care about her. But, urn, 
she lost her house and stuff and really needed money. She 
had—she was homeless, she had nowhere to go. So she did it 
out of desperation. 
D: Did he ever hurt you? 
was there anybody 
out that I did this. 
, everyone talks—
V: Sometimes he got vic 
D: Violent as in what? A 
V: He pulled my hair. 
pulled. Like, he— o"" 
you're all, like, not-
mean, like, if you're 
like, my ponytails—
would pull it to whei 
my hair, and then so) 
throw me whichever 
just like use a toy ot 
penis, though, ever. 
little, so he could pu 
throw, obviously it's 
I mean, there's been• 
able to walk, urn, ft 
really—nothing spec 
can't really recall. 
Nothing that I went ti 
getting tore up a few i 
D: This is getting real pe 
V: What, like, had I had 
D: Okay. 
V: Urn. But honest, I me; 
three steady boyfrien( 
ever done anything w 
a year. So it's not like 
FILTHY RICH 
ERSON 
pod enough. So I filled it out 
es. So I'm pretty sure he wasn't 
telling me that he was. But I 
h the reason I stayed there so 
ght in front of me, you know? 
[redacted], was there anybody 
Duse? 
muse it got out that I did this. 
. You know, everyone talks—
Not that I would want anybody 
girls I didn't like and, frankly, 
s that I knew were skanks. That 
at would just, like, suck dick in 
not even people I was friends 
about a girl and be like, ""Hey, I 
ke two hundred dollars. How 
lat out, like, ""This is what you've 
this? 'Cause I'm not gonna take 
them. They all know that I got 
actually [redacted]. She took off 
Terweight, so he didn't want any-
& was my best friend. But, you 
ry. I did care about her. But, urn, 
.ff and really needed money. She 
le had nowhere to go. So she did it 
48 
V: Sometimes he got violent, yeah. 
D: Violent as in what? As in — 
V: He pulled my hair a lot harder than it should have been 
pulled. Like, he—okay, I can understand having sex, and 
you're all, like, not—not that we were having sex, but I 
mean, like, if you're all into it and you pull hair a little bit, 
like, my ponytails—just like a little bit, whatever. But he 
would pull it to where it would rip my hair out. it would rip 
my hair, and then sometimes he would pick me up and, like, 
throw me whichever way he wanted me, and then he would 
just like use a toy or, like, his hand or whatever. Never his 
penis, though, ever. I never had sex with him. But urn—I'm 
little, so he could pick me up. Like, if you pick me up and 
throw, obviously it's gonna hurt.... 
I mean, there's been nights that I walked out of there barely 
able to walk, urn, from him being so rough. But nothing 
really—nothing specific that he really got violent with. Like, 
I can't really recall. 
Nothing that I went to the doctor for, no. I mean, I remember 
getting tore up a few times, but it was nothing that—
D: This is getting real personal, but were you active before him? 
V: What, like, had I had sex? Yeah [laughs]. 
D: Okay. 
V: Urn. But honest, I mean, I'm not—I'm not a ho. I've had only 
three steady boyfriends, and those are the only three that I've 
ever done anything with. And they were all with me for over 
a year. So it's not like I just go and hook up at parties. 
49 
only in me for, like 
could say that ion: 
whatever the fuck 
you doing?"" [giggl 
""Oh, I just wanted 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Like, I've gotten thousands of dollars' worth of shit. Man, the 
underwear I'm wearing right now he gave me. Like, I'd—I'd 
go over there and there'd be a bag of Victoria's Secret under-
wear, like, waiting for me, like, talking, like, fifteen hundred 
dollars' worth of stuff. I got a plane ticket from him once. I 
got a car, I got Christmas bonuses, I got movie tickets. Like, 
he'd buy me movie tickets— like, he'd say, ""Hey, have you 
gone to the movies lately?"" I'd be like, ""I dunno, oh—not 
really,"" [and] he goes, ""Do you want to go?"" He'd give me, 
like, eight movie tickets. I got show tickets; I went and 
saw, like, David Copperfield. I had, like, VIP tickets or some-
thing like that. 
I need to show you, like, what I'm talking about, like, the posi-
tioning that we were—it was like, okay, here's the thing: there's 
the, like, little flower thing, then here's the massage table. I was 
right here, he was right here, [and] she was here. Urn. And I was 
standing up, and he just pushed me over the table, and he did 
his thing with me. 
D: Okay. Were you facing the table? Were you? 
V: I was. I was facedown on the table. Like, facedown, hands, 
like, on my head, holding—I don't, I don't mean—I wasn't 
fighting, really. So I don't know if he was holding me down to 
kinda stop me from fighting or what he was doing. He's just a 
really weird—he's into really weird stuff. Like, I was just bent 
over, and my face was on the table. I was facedown on the 
table. And then he did his thing. So. But anyway, [redacted] was 
right here, and I'm pretty sure she was naked, and the couch 
is, like, right behind, but, urn, that's how it happened. . .. He was 
50 
FILTHY RICH 
1RSON 
ollars' worth of shit. Man, the 
ow he gave me. Like, I'd—I'd 
bag of Victoria's Secret under-
talking, like, fifteen hundred 
plane ticket from him once. I 
uses, I got movie tickets. Like, 
like, he'd say, ""Hey, have you 
'd be like, ""I dunno, oh—not 
Du want to go?"" He'd give me, 
got show tickets; I went and 
I had, like, VIP tickets or some-
I'm talking about, like, the posi-
like, okay, here's the thing: there's 
Len here's the massage table. I was 
.and] she was here. Um. And I was 
hed me over the table, and he did 
able? Were you? 
:he table. Like, facedown, hands, 
—I don't, I don't mean—' wasn't 
-low if he was holding me down to 
or what he was doing. He's just a 
.ly weird stuff. Like, I was just bent 
the table. I was facedown on the 
ling. So. But anyway, [redacted] was 
3ure she was naked, and the couch 
m, that's how it happened. . . He was 
50 
only in me for, like, a minute or two. I don't even know if you 
could say that long. He put it in, did a couple of pumps, or 
whatever the fuck you wanna call it, and I was like, ""What are 
you doing?"" [giggles] I go, ""What are you doing?"" He's like, 
""Oh, I just wanted [redacted] to see this."" Then that was that. 
the Canopy Beach 
asked if she wanted 
have to provide a mi 
thought about the off 
Molly (Unknowi. 
name) picked [Dob[ 
house. Upon her arr 
Epstein in the kitch 
duced to a white fem, 
upstairs to the main 
bedroom. 
Sarah arranged t, 
with a sheet. She broi 
next to the massage 
informed [Dobbs] Jet 
the bedroom wearing 
He removed the 
table. He laid on the 
massage oil for [Dobb 
""He tried to touch m 
I asked how he tried tc 
grabbed her buttocks , 
""I'll massage you,"" Di 
to be touched."" 
[Dobbs] stated she per 
elusion of the massage 
CHAPTER 13 
Wendy Dobbs: October 3, 2005 
Eti 
very chance he gets— and he gets lots of chances— Chief 
Reiter drills the same thing into his investigators' heads: 
they need to be careful. Patient. Methodical. Strategic. Or 
Epstein's lawyers will eat them for lunch. 
Inch by inch, they move their case toward the goalpost. But 
in October, Detective Recarey and his coworkers catch a break 
that moves the ball several yards down the field. 
On the first Monday of that month, they pick Wendy up at her 
house and, down at the police station, she starts to sing—like a bird. 
The detectives can hardly believe it or get it all down fast 
enough. Later on, in a probable-cause affidavit, Detective Recarey 
will write: 
Approximately two years ago, just after she turned 17 years 
of age, [Wendy] was approached by a friend named Molly at 
52 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 13 
005 
[ he gets lots of chances—Chief 
ng into his investigators' heads: 
'atient. Methodical. Strategic. Or 
for lunch. 
.ir case toward the goalpost. But 
and his coworkers catch a break 
Es down the field. 
month, they pick Wendy up at her 
ttion, she starts to sing—like a bird. 
believe it or get it all down fast 
-cause affidavit, Detective Recarey 
p, just after she turned 17 years 
ched by a friend named Molly at 
52 
the Canopy Beach Resort in Riviera Beach. [Dobbs] was 
asked if she wanted to make money. She was told she would 
have to provide a massage and should make $200. [Dobbs] 
thought about the offer and agreed to meet with Jeffrey. 
Molly (Unknown last name) and Tony (Unknown last 
name) picked [Dobbs] up and she was taken to Epstein's 
house. Upon her arrival to the house she was introduced to 
Epstein in the kitchen of the house. She was also intro-
duced to a white female known to her as Sarah. She was led 
upstairs to the main bedroom known to her as Jeff Epstein's 
bedroom. 
Sarah arranged the massage table and covered the table 
with a sheet. She brought out the massage oils and laid them 
next to the massage bed. Sarah then left the room and 
informed [Dobbs] Jeff would be in, in a minute. Jeff entered 
the bedroom wearing only a towel. 
He removed the towel and laid nude on the massage 
table. He laid on the table onto his stomach and picked a 
massage oil for [Dobbs] to rub on him. 
""He tried to touch me, and I stopped him,"" says Dobbs. 
I asked how he tried to touch her. [Dobbs] stated that Epstein 
grabbed her buttocks and she felt uncomfortable. 
""I'll massage you,"" Dobbs had told Epstein. ""But I don't want 
to be touched."" 
[Dobbs] stated she performed the massage naked. At the con-
clusion of the massage, Epstein paid [Dobbs] $200. 
53 
JAMES PATTERSON 
After the massage Epstein stated to [Dobbs] that he 
understood she was not comfortable, but he would pay her if 
she brought over some girls. He told her the younger the bet-
ter. (Dobbs] stated she once tried to bring a 23-year-old 
female and Epstein stated that the female was too old. 
(Dobbs] stated that in total she only remembers six girls that 
she brought to see Epstein. Each time she was paid $200. 
[Dobbs] said at the time she brought these girls to Epstein's 
house they were all 14 through 16 [years] of age. 
Wendy Dobbs keeps talking. What she says about Mary's 
visit lines up neatly with what Mary's already told the police. 
Wendy's own experience with Epstein syncs up, too. But Wen-
dy's not a victim, as Mary is. After all, she's been playing on 
Epstein's team. Team predator. 
A police sergeant enters the room. What he wants to know is, 
does Wendy realize that she's implicated herself in Epstein's 
crimes? 
Beads of sweat form on Wendy's forehead, and now the police 
know they've really got her. She gives them phone numbers to go 
with the young girls she's named. She provides addresses. But 
no, Wendy doesn't quite get it. On the way home, in a police car, 
she brags in the backseat: 
""I'm like a Heidi Fleiss,"" she tells the escorting officers. 
54 
Wendy Dobbs, inter 
Sergeant Frick, Oct( 
video (excerpts) 
RECAREY: Okay. Your* 
of all, I know you're 
Okay? I want to thar 
door's closed, you're 
you know, it's only c 
DOBBS: That's fine. 
RECAREY: I understan, 
case that we're look 
brought you here tod 
untarily. You agreed 
I do want to talk yc 
thing. 
DOBBS: And I don't neec 
ERSON 
stated to [Dobbs] that he 
tble, but he would pay her if 
:old her the younger the bet-
-ied to bring a 23-year-0ld 
it the female was too old. 
mly remembers six girls that 
eh time she was paid $200. 
ought these girls to Epstein's 
16 [years] of age. 
What she says about Mary's 
Mary's already told the police. 
4)stein syncs up, too. But Wen-
kfter all, she's been playing on 
700M. What he wants to know is, 
implicated herself in Epstein's 
dy's forehead, and now the police 
: gives them phone numbers to go 
aed. She provides addresses. But 
On the way home, in a police car, 
e tells the escorting officers. 
54 
CHAPTER 14 
Wendy Dobbs, interview with Detective Recarey and 
Sergeant Frick, October 3, 2005, transcribed from 
video (excerpts) 
RECAREY: Okay. Your Pepsi's coming, my Pepsi's coming. First 
of all, I know you're freaking out. Don't freak out, just relax. 
Okay? I want to thank you for coming. All right? Though the 
. door's closed, you're free to go at any time. You're not here—
you know, it's only closed for our privacy. 
DOBBS: That's fine. 
RECAREY: I understand that you may have information on a 
case that we're looking into, okay? That's the reason why I 
brought you here today. All right? And again, you're here vol-
untarily. You agreed to come back with us and talk to us. But 
I do want to talk you about Jeff Epstein, and the whole... 
thing. 
DOBBS: And I don't need a lawyer, right? 
55 
JAMES PATTERSON 
RECAREY: It's up to you. If you wanted one, you can have one. 
I can't tell you yes or no on that. That's totally [up] to you, I'm 
only — 
DOBBS: I'm not gonna get in trouble for anything I say, right? 
RECAREY: Right now, you're just a witness. I'm talking to you as 
a witness.... That's totally up to you. You wanna talk to me? 
DOBBS: I have no problem telling you everything I know. I'm a 
very cooperative person. 
RECAREY: Okay. How did you first meet, um.—
DOBBS: I first met Jeffrey—I was at a beach resort on Singer 
Island, and I was approached by this girl I went to school 
with. Her name was [redacted]. And she was asking me, you 
know, ""Oh, you need extra money, I know this guy...."" I 
thought about it and I finally gave her a call, and her and her 
friend [redacted] met up with me. I actually picked them up 
and we drove down to Jeffrey's house. She introduced me, 
whatever. 
RECAREY: Okay. Now, what [do] you mean by making money, 
how do you make money with Jeffrey? 
DOBBS: Um, there's two ways. There's two ways you can make 
money. He'll, all right — 
RECAREY: That's all right. Talk to me. Talk to me like, like 
nothin'. 
DOBBS: How do I say— this is going to sound really sleazy, but 
RECAREY: No. Go ahead. Talk to me. 
DOBBS: Every girl that meets Jeffrey starts off with giving him a 
massage. The more you do with him, the more you make. 
Basically, if you take off your clothes, you're gonna make more. 
If you let him do things to you, you're gonna make more. 
RECAREY: Like ""do things"" you mean, touch you? 
56 
DOBBS: Yeah. Touch yoi 
RECAREY: Okay. Does I 
DOBBS: He uses his hand 
I guess it's like a ma 
that refused to do th 
but I wouldn't let hirr 
that he's like, ""You l 
you $200 for every 
don't want you to ma: 
girls to me...."" So th; 
For every girl that yc 
that I brought to Jeffri 
there. 
RECAREY: Just to bring 
DOBBS: Yeah. Just to brir 
RECAREY: Okay. And t: 
would have to massag 
DOBBS: She knew ever)/ 
one of Jeffrey's rules. 
the house that didn't 
would tell me, you knc 
expect, make sure the 
I get in that room I di 
need to know."" And, 
everything she was get 
RECAREY: Okay. What di 
DOBBS: I told her the sam 
Jeffrey --she came to r 
I basically told her at 
""What do you have to 
TERSON 
wanted one, you can have one. 
it. That's totally [up] to you, I'm 
ble for anything I say, right? 
a witness. I'm talking to you as 
to you. You wanna talk to me? 
tg you everything I know. I'm a 
irst meet, um—
vas at a beach resort on Singer 
by this girl I went to school 
.!.d1. And she was asking me, you 
I money, I know this guy...."" I 
y gave her a call, and her and her 
th me. I actually picked them up 
'rey's house. She introduced me, 
dol you mean by making money, 
•ith Jeffrey? 
. There's two ways you can make 
'alk to me. Talk to me like, like 
going to sound really sleazy, but 
k to me. 
Jeffrey starts off with giving him a 
lo with him, the more you make. 
ur clothes, you're gonna make more. 
you, you're gonna make more. 
,ou mean, touch you? 
56 
FILTHY RICH 
DOBBS: Yeah. Touch you in inappropriate places. 
RECAREY: Okay. Does he use his hand? Does he — 
DOBBS: He uses his hands and, I really wouldn't call it a vibrator — 
I guess it's like a massager? But urn—I was one of the girls 
that refused to do that. I did it basically my—I did it naked, 
but I wouldn't let him touch me or anything like that. So after 
that he's like, ""You know what?"" He's like, ""Listen, I'll pay 
you $200 for every girl that you bring to me."" He's like, ""I 
don't want you to massage me anymore, you know, just bring 
girls to me...."" So that's the other way you can make money. 
For every girl that you bring to the table—so, for every girl 
that I brought to Jeffrey—I would make $200. Flat. Just right 
there. 
RECAREY: Just to bring a girl. 
DOBBS: Yeah. Just to bring a girl. 
RECAREY: Okay. And the girl that was going knew that she 
would have to massage him. 
DOBBS: She knew everything. She knew everything. That was 
one of Jeffrey's rules. He had a problem with girls coming to 
the house that didn't know what they were getting into. He 
would tell me, you know, ""Make sure these girls know what I 
expect, make sure they know what they want, because when 
I get in that room I don't want them to—you know—they 
need to know."" And, as far as [redacteas case, she knew 
everything she was getting herself into. It was all volunteer. 
RECAREY: Okay. What did you tell her that she was gonna do? 
DOBBS: I told her the same thing. I told her, you know, this guy 
Jeffrey—she came to me saying she needed money, da da da. 
I basically told her about it. She was like, urn, you know, 
""What do you have to do?"" I told her. I was like, ""The more 
57 
DOBBS: The more she'd 
RECAREY: The more sh 
DOBBS: Yeah. 
RECAREY: So, she had i 
DOBBS: Urn, I don't kni 
ent stories on that. 
But when I was first 
who introduced me 
slept with him and r 
or secretary—told 
plays around with ti 
RECAREY: So, when yo 
happened between y 
DOBBS: Nothing. I woul 
RECAREY: Okay. Did h( 
DOBBS: I wouldn't say he 
pointed. But I'm not-
let him—I let him lo 
the question for him. 
kind of down-promoi 
bring girls."" But as far 
RECAREY: Okay. How 
aside from [redacted 
DOBBS: Oh. Urn. A lot. 
RECAREY: A lot? 
DOBBS: Urn, let's see, th 
RECAREY: And all thest 
DOBBS: Every one of th( 
JAMES PATTERSON 
you do, the more you make. That's it. In order to make money, 
you're gonna have to go up there. You're gonna take your 
clothes off. But the more you do, is the more you make."" She 
walked out of there with $300. So she obviously and evi-
dently let him do a little more. Plus, on our way home, she 
kinda told me what she did. 
RECAREY: Which was? Give the massage.... 
DOBBS: She gave the massage, and she basically let him, like, 
touch her, down there. Basically. 
RECAREY: Did he touch her with his hands? 
DOBBS: All with his hands. And then he brought out the mas-
sager. From what she told me. 
RECAREY: How old were you when you were approached to see 
Jeffrey? 
DOBBS: Um, I think I was seventeen? 
RECAREY: Seventeen. 
DOBBS: Sixteen or seventeen. 
RECAREY: Okay. When was the last time you talked to him? 
DOBBS: It's been a while. I can honestly say it's probably been 
about close to a year. About a year. I actually stopped work-
ing for him. 
RECAREY: Who was the last girl you brought over? 
DOBBS: The last girl I brought over was [redacted[.... 
RECAREY: Okay. You got paid two hundred bucks for taking her 
over? 
DOBBS: Yes. 
RECAREY: Okay. [Redacted] knew... 
DOBBS: She knew everything. 
RECAREY: That she'd have to massage him, and the more she did-
58 
TERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
aat's it. In order to make money, 
there. You're gonna take your 
do, is the more you make."" She 
So she obviously and evi-
re. Plus, on our way home, she 
massage.... 
and she basically let him, like, 
ally. 
.h his hands? 
.d then he brought out the mas-
e. 
Alen you were approached to see 
ateen? 
Le last time you talked to him? 
n honestly say it's probably been 
it a year. I actually stopped work-
;irl you brought over? 
over was [redacted]. 
. two hundred bucks for taking her 
knew... 
aassage him, and the more she did 
58 
DOBBS: The more she'd make. 
RECAREY: The more she got paid. 
DOBBS: Yeah. 
RECAREY: So, she had intercourse with him. 
DOBBS: Urn, I don't know about the intercourse. I heard differ-
ent stories on that. I've never asked him ""Oh, you know ..."" 
But when I was first introduced to him, my friend [redacted] 
who introduced me to him, told me that she knew a girl who 
slept with him and made $1,000. But from what his intern—
or secretary—told me, is that he doesn't do that. He just 
plays around with them. So I heard two different stories. 
RECAREY: So, when you went and you massaged him, nothing 
happened between you two. 
DOBBS: Nothing. I wouldn't let him. 
RECAREY: Okay. Did he become forceful? Did he get upset? 
DOBBS: I wouldn't say he became upset. I think he was a little disap-
pointed. But I'm not—I didn't care. I knew I was getting paid. I 
let him—I let him look, but I never let him touch. It was out of 
the question for him. And I think that's pretty much why he just, 
kind of down-promoted me? He was just kind of like, ""You can 
bring girls."" But as far as working, you know—
RECAREY: Okay. How many girls have you brought to him, 
aside from [redacted]? 
DOBBS: Oh. Urn. A lot. 
RECAREY: A lot? 
DOBBS: Um, let's see, there's [several redacted names].... 
RECAREY: And all these girls knew what they had to do? 
DOBBS: Every one of them. 
59 
JAMES PATTERSON 
ti 
RECAREY: How long have you been working for him? 
DOBBS: Um ...I probably worked for him for a year. 
RECAREY: Okay. And out of all these girls... 
DOBBS: Those were all the girls I brought. But you have to 
remember, those girls brought other girls, too. 
RECAREY: Oh, okay. 
DOBBS: So it's like—it's like a train. It's like, I introduced him to 
all my friends, and then ... it goes on and on, like that 
RECAREY: Okay.... [Redacted] being fourteen or fifteen at the 
time—' think [redacted] was fourteen when this happened 
who else was underage? Out of all these? 
DOBBS: Underage, what do you mean? 
RECAREY: Under eighteen. 
DOBBS: Under eighteen? All of 'ern 
RECAREY: All of them? 
DOBBS: All of them.... 
RECAREY: Okay. Did Jeff know anybody's real true age? Or he 
didn't care. 
DOBBS: I don't think he cared. He told me the younger the better. 
RECAREY: The younger the better. All right. 
DOBBS: Pretty much. That's how it worked. He didn't—let me 
just put it this way: I tried to bring him a woman who was 
twenty-three, and he didn't really like it. 
RECAREY: Didn't go for it. 
DOBBS: It's not that he didn't go for it. He just didn't care for it. 
And he likes the girls that [are] between the ages of, like, 
eighteen and twenty.... But some of them, I think, lie about 
their age. I know that when 1 started off young, I think he 
knew better [than] to believe me. I think he knew that I was 
60 
younger—like, sev 
teen. Most of those 
RECAREY: Let's talk at 
DOBBS: Okay. 
RECAREY: [Mary] at tl 
DOBBS: Mm-hmm. 
RECAREY: Okay. She 
she know you work 
DOBBS: I told her. 
RECAREY: You had tol 
DOBBS: Mm-hmm. 
RECAREY: Did you tell 
DOBBS: She knew ever 
RECAREY: Okay. So sh 
some kind of—
DOBBS: Contact. Prett) 
what his expectatio 
girls that go up thei 
I was like, ""If you 
you go in that room 
know he was goin4 
right now, he's exp€ 
RECAREY: Basically, tt 
DOBBS: Fondling — 
RECAREY: Fondling — 
DOBBS: Or whatever. A 
Just like, ""Just rem 
make. But that's—I 
brought up, told he] 
FILTHY RICH 
EERSON 
en working for him? 
for him for a year. 
aese girls... 
s I brought. But you have to 
t other girls, too. 
tin. It's like, I introduced him to 
goes on and on, like that. 
being fourteen or fifteen at the 
fourteen when this happened—
of all these? 
mean? 
em. 
v anybody's real true age? Or he 
le told me the younger the better. 
tter. All right. 
ow it worked. He didn't—let me 
to bring him a woman who was 
• really like it. 
go for it. He just didn't care for it. 
tt [are] between the ages of, like, 
it some of them, I think, lie about 
en I started off young, I think he 
,.ve me. I think he knew that I was 
60 
younger—like, seventeen—but I told him I was, like, eigh-
teen. Most of those girls lie when they go in there. 
RECAREY: Let's talk about [Mary] for a minute. 
DOBBS: Okay. 
RECAREY: [Mary] at the time was dating your cousin, right? 
DOBBS: Mm-hmm. 
RECAREY: Okay. She told you she needed to make money. Did 
she know you worked for Jeffrey? 
DOBBS: I told her. 
RECAREY: You had told her you worked for Jeffrey. 
DOBBS: Mm-hmm. 
RECAREY: Did you tell her what it entailed? So she knew that? 
DOBBS: She knew everything before she even agreed to it. 
RECAREY: Okay. So she knew that there was going to have to be 
some kind of—
DOBBS: Contact. Pretty much. Yeah. I told her. I told her exactly 
what his expectations were. I told her what goes on with the 
girls that go up there. I told her—it was like, ""It's your call."" 
I was like, ""If you want to do this, fine. If not, fine. But when 
you go in that room, I don't want to hear you say, 'Oh, I didn't 
know he was going to do all that.' Because I'm telling you 
right now, he's expecting it."" 
RECAREY: Basically, this is touching—
DOBBS: Fondling—
RECAREY: Fondling — 
DOBBS: Or whatever. And I told her when she went on her own. 
Just like, ""Just remember, the more you do, the more you 
make. But that's—that's up to you."" And she asked me, and I 
brought up, told her I wouldn't do more. 
61 
JAMES PATTERSON 
RECAREY: Okay. You made that clear, you wouldn't do more. 
DOBBS: No. Screw that! 
RECAREY: But as far as Mary] is concerned. What did she tell 
you that happened in that room? 
DOBBS: Exact words? If I can recall, when she came downstairs 
from—when she came downstairs, me and her and [redacted 
we all walked out. We got into the car. And I was like, ""How 
much did you make?"" She's like, ""Three hundred dollars."" And I 
looked at [Mary] and I just knew right then she did more. 
RECAREY: Than just a massage, right? 
DOBBS: Yeah. And I asked her. I was like, ""Well, what'd you do?"" 
She's like, ""Well, I started giving a massage, and then my 
clothes came off and, you know, he put his fingers inside me. 
And then he brought out the massager."" And that's basically 
what she said. 
RECAREY: It's all right. You can talk to me. It's all right. 
DOBBS: It's kind of incredible talking about it, now that I—I 
can't believe I worked for him. 
RECAREY: But it's okay. You know what, we all go through 
things in life, you know what I mean? It's an experience. And 
you can put this experience behind you. 
Do girls that—people that you brought over—how did you 
approach them? That they were going to have to do this... 
Like, if they wanted to work, how did you approach them? 
Say, ""Listen, I got this guy in Palm Beach?"" 
DOBBS: Urn. .. Two of them were my friends. The others were, 
like, my acquaintances. It was a little more easier talking to 
them about it, 'cause, like, I knew them. 
62 
RECAREY: Take a de 
see you're workir 
can see it, and I d 
DOBBS: I, urn, pretty 
RECAREY: Straight u 
DOBBS: ""If you're loo 
down in Palm Be 
have to give him 
Then, if they were 
I'd go into detail 
they told me, ""Ye: 
I'd tell them, ""01( 
you have to do, th 
RECAREY: Did you te 
from bringing the 
DOBBS: Most part? I 
were open about I 
was making mone 
RECAREY: Okay. Gil 
Gimme two secon 
• • • 
All right, I talked 
FRICK: —Which is NN 
DOBBS: Okay. 
FRICK: Obviously I 
at this point you cl 
You've taken girls 
prostitution. Mon 
those girls was fou 
significant second 
TERSON 
:lear, you wouldn't do more. 
s concerned. What did she tell 
m? 
:all, when she came downstairs 
tairs, me and her and [redacted], 
o the car. And I was like, ""How 
e, ""Three hundred dollars?' And I 
w right then she did more. 
right? 
was like, ""Well, what'd you do?"" 
;tying a massage, and then my 
ow, he put his fingers inside me. 
!. massager."" And that's basically 
talk to me. It's all right. 
talking about it, now that I—I 
m. 
know what, we all go through 
at I mean? It's an experience. And 
: behind you. 
you brought over —how did you 
were going to have to do this... 
irk, how did you approach them? 
in Palm Beach?"" 
/ere my friends. The others were, 
was a little more easier talking to 
I knew them. 
62 
FILTHY RICH 
RECAREY: Take a deep breath. Take a deep breath. 'Cause I can 
see you're working up again. You're working up the tears, I 
can see it, and I don't want to get you like that. 
DOBBS: I, urn, pretty much I just would ask them — 
RECAREY: Straight up? 
DOBBS: ""If you're looking for extra money, let me know; this guy 
down in Palm Beach, he's really, really, really wealthy. You 
have to give him a massage."" That's all I would tell them. 
Then, if they were interested or told me, ""Yes, I want to do it,"" 
I'd go into detail with them before they'd actually agree. If 
they told me, ""Yeah, that sounds good, I'm interested,"" then 
I'd tell them, ""Okay, well I'm gonna let you know, this is what 
you have to do, this is what's gonna go on."" 
RECAREY: Did you tell them that you were going to make money 
from bringing them over? Or.—. 
DOBBS: Most part? I believe they knew.... Most of the girls, we 
were open about that. We didn't—they pretty much knew I 
was making money under the table. So... 
RECAREY: Okay. Gimme two seconds. Let me get the soda.... 
Gimme two seconds. 
All right, I talked to my boss a little bit — 
FRICK: —Which is why I'm here. 
DOBBS: Okay. 
FRICK: Obviously I was listening to what you were saying. And 
at this point you clearly implicated yourself on a crime, okay? 
You've taken girls to somebody's house for the purpose of 
prostitution. More importantly, more significantly, one of 
those girls was fourteen at the time, okay? Now that's a pretty 
significant second-degree felony, okay? I'm not going to kid 
63 
JAMES PATTERSON 
you, that is— it's a significant thing, okay? Now, you came 
in, you cooperated with us. The question we have for you 
now is, do you want to continue cooperating with us and try 
and help us make a case against Jeff? 
DOBBS: I don't think that's really going to help me in the long 
run, though. I've already admitted to a second-degree felony, 
right? 
FRICK: Yeah, you have. 
DOBBS: Okay, so there you go. What's going to keep me out of 
trouble? It's not going to keep me out of trouble. I've already 
admitted committing a crime. 
FRICK: I'm not going to argue with that.... 
DOBBS: So basically I just fucked myself. I can go two ways. I 
can agree not to cooperate, which is going to put me at — 
well—now you can use the second-degree felony against me. 
Or you can help and work with it and maybe get myself some 
slack.... 
FRICK: We're still talkin' here. What would the odds be of you 
contacting Jeff at this point? Have you had any contact with 
him at all? 
DOBBS: I have not had any contact — 
FRICK: How about with — 
DOBBS: No, none of 'em. None of 'em.... I had a phone call about 
four or five months ago, and I told my parents. Look, I swear 
to you I'm not anywhere—like, no connection with him at 
all. That's why I pretty much got my number changed. I have 
not made any communication with him. It stopped. 
FRICK: Okay. Well, I mean, that's good. That's good that you 
stopped.... 
64 
This is what we'd 
some of your ex-
Now, the questior 
working for Jeff, i. 
to Jeff? Or can w 
you make a call a 
know, these guys 
everything?"" Our 
right? 
RECAREY: With youi 
FRICK: Let me, let 
thing, okay? Then 
leading to the de 
second-degree fel( 
demeanor.... First 
not going to take y 
DOBBS: Not today. 
FRICK: Well, you're — 
ate and if we can-
not—that's not ur 
would do is if we I 
meanor, we'd give 
in, you know."" 
RECAREY: You sign it 
FRICK: That's our pr 
forthright with us, 
RECAREY: Very truth. 
FRICK: Do you want I 
deal with it, or do• 
FILTHY RICH 
rERSON 
t thing, okay? Now, you came 
The question we have for you 
ue cooperating with us and try 
1st Jeff? 
y going to help me in the long 
Lilted to a second-degree felony, 
What's going to keep me out of 
p me out of trouble. I've already 
ith that.... 
ed myself. I can go two ways. I 
which is going to put me at — 
second-degree felony against me. 
ith it and maybe get myself some 
What would the odds be of you 
? Have you had any contact with 
""act—
of 'em.... I had a phone call about 
d I told my parents. Look, I swear 
—like, no connection with him at 
ch got my number changed. I have 
lion with him. It stopped. 
that's good. That's good that you 
64 
This is what we'd like to do: We would like to reach out to 
some of your ex-friends and [unintelligible] talk to them. 
Now, the question is, do we think that they are currently still 
working for Jeff, in which case they would make a phone call 
to Jeff? Or can we just kinda show up and, you know, have 
you make a call as we're standing outside and say: ""Hey, you 
know, these guys wanna talk to you, and I've already told 'ern 
everything?"" Our goal is to make a better case against Jeff, all 
right? 
RECAREY: With your cooperation. 
FRICK: Let me, let me get back to—past--the cooperation 
thing, okay? There are lesser charges that can easily be filed: 
leading to the delinquency of a minor, as compared to a 
second-degree felony. You know what I mean? That's a mis-
demeanor.... First of all, I'll tell you straight up, okay, we're 
not going to take you to jail today.... 
DOBBS: Not today. 
FRICK: Well, you're—And here's the other thing: If you cooper-
ate and if we can—If you cooperate, whether we pull it off or 
not— that's not up to you, that's up to us, okay? So what we 
would do is if we ended up charging you with like a misde-
meanor, we'd give you a call, we'd say: ""Hey, you gotta come 
in, you know."" 
RECAREY: You sign it.... 
FRICK: That's our preference. You come in, you've been very 
forthright with us, you've been very up front — 
RECAREY: Very truthful. 
FRICK: Do you want us to call your parents, or do you want to 
deal with it, or do you —As far as we're concerned you're an 
65 
JAMES PATTERSON 
adult, okay? You're nineteen. You do what you do. You know, 
we can drop you off at the end of the block if you'd like. Or 
we can cushion the blow beyond what—but again, you're 
helping us at this point. We've been pretty forthright with 
you on what is going on, our options for your future. And 
what we'd like you to do obviously is make a couple of calls 
with us this evening to talk to a couple of your, you know, 
these other girls. 
DOBBS: I'm not really on a ...Me and my parents really don't get 
along right now.. 
FRICK: So you'd prefer that — 
DOBBS: If they found out that I was—If they found out that I 
was into some other stuff.... I'm actually stripping now.... So 
they're not exactly happy with me at the moment, and I don't 
want to do anything that's going to piss 'ern off even 
furthermore. 
Michael Reiter: Oc 
Chief Reiter sifts 
underage girls - 
cured for Epste 
on El Brillo. An arre 
caught with a dime bo 
She'd told Detectiv 
very much like a rape 
Soon Reiter will a5 
more footwork to do, 
his office. 
Later that day, De 
arrive at the home of 
* Jenny's, Francine's, an( 
dialogue have been cha 
TERSON 
fou do what you do. You know, 
id of the block if you'd like. Or 
yond what—but again, you're 
've been pretty forthright with 
r options for your future. And 
iously is make a couple of calls 
to a couple of your, you know, 
and my parents really don't get 
I was they found out that I 
I'm actually stripping now.. .. So 
.th me at the moment, and I don't 
t's going to piss 'em off even 
66 
CHAPTER IS 
Michael Reiter: October 3, 2005 
Chief Reiter sifts through the evidence: information about 
underage girls—six of them—whom Wendy Dobbs pro-
cured for Epstein. Phone numbers pulled from the trash 
on El Brillo. An arrest report for Alison, the girl who'd been 
caught with a dime bag of weed. 
She'd told Detective Recarey about an encounter that sounded 
very much like a rape. 
Soon Reiter will ask a judge for a warrant. But not yet. There's 
more footwork to do, and Reiter calls Detective Joe Recarey into 
his office. 
Later that day, Detective Recarey and Sergeant George Frick 
arrive at the home of a girl named Jenny.* An older woman greets 
* Jenny's, Francine's, and Kristina's names, some identifying details, and 
dialogue have been changed. 
67 
JAMES PATTERSON 
them at the front door and invites them inside. She introduces 
them to her husband and daughter. Jenny is sixteen years old. 
Sitting down at the dining room table, they see that she's ner-
vous. In between biting her lip and fidgeting, she tells them that 
yes, she's been to Jeffrey Epstein's house. 
Wendy took her there once. But nothing much happened. 
She met Epstein's chef and spent some time in the kitchen is all. 
Then she left. 
""I get what you're asking,"" she says. ""But really, I just want to 
put the whole thing behind me."" 
""Okay,"" the officers tell her. ""You have our numbers. But 
Jenny, if you remember anything else, you'll find that we're very 
good listeners."" 
One down. Five to go. 
Detective Recarey and Detective Michael Dawson have better 
luck the next day with Francine, a girl who tells them that a year 
earlier, Wendy Dobbs—someone she knew from high school—
drove her to the house on El Brillo Way. 
Francine would have been seventeen at the time. 
Now she's willing to make a sworn statement. The officers 
noted: 
She was told she could make money working for Jeff. She was 
told she would have to provide a massage for Jeff. . She was 
brought to the kitchen area by (Dobbs]. They met with the 
house chef who was already in the Kitchen area. Francine 
stated [Wendy] would wait for her in the kitchen. 
Just as she did wit 
Francine upstairs and 
the room, wearing onl 
She kept her clothi 
sometime during th, 
and pulled her clos, 
uncomfortable by ti 
sion of the massage 
""Do you have any 
cers ask. 
""No,"" says Francine 
But she does have c 
Sarah's been callirq 
It could mean any r 
that Epstein's caught IN 
he's doing something 
responsibility. This tr( 
day, they get one more 
her parents around she 
It turns out that Jenny's 
And, it turns out, 
kitchen. Without her p 
talk about it. 
The first time she'd 
says, Epstein had tried 
FILTHY RICH 
FERSON 
:s them inside. She introduces 
her. Jenny is sixteen years old. 
table, they see that she's ner-
id fidgeting, she tells them that 
house. 
But nothing much happened. 
some time in the kitchen is all. 
e says. ""But really, I just want to 
""You have our numbers. But 
g else, you'll find that we're very 
ve Michael Dawson have better 
a girl who tells them that a year 
ne she knew from high school — 
illo Way. 
3eventeen at the time. 
a sworn statement. The officers 
money working for Jeff. She was 
de a massage for Jeff. . . . She was 
by (Dobbs]. They met with the 
ly in the Kitchen area. Francine 
for her in the kitchen. 
68 
Just as she did with Mary, a woman named Sarah had taken 
Francine upstairs and into a bedroom. Then Epstein had entered 
the room, wearing only a towel. 
She kept her clothes on during the massage. She advised 
sometime during the massage, Epstein grabbed her buttocks 
and pulled her close to him. Francine said she was [made] 
uncomfortable by the incident involving Jeff. At the conclu-
sion of the massage she was paid $200.00 for the massage. 
""Do you have any formal training in massages?"" the offi-
cers ask. 
""No,"" says Francine. 
But she does have one more thing to tell them. 
Sarah's been calling Francine's cell phone. 
It could mean any number of things. The police know already 
that Epstein's caught wind of their investigation. Now it appears 
he's doing something about it, or at least he's delegating the 
responsibility. This troubles the cops. But then, on that same 
day, they get one more break: Jenny calls and says that without 
her parents around she's willing to make a sworn statement. 
It turns out that Jenny's visited with Epstein several times. 
And, it turns out, she'd done much more than sit in the 
kitchen. Without her parents around, she's much more willing to 
talk about it. 
The first time she'd gone to the house on El Brill° Way, she 
says, Epstein had tried to take off her shirt. She'd become upset, 
69 
JAMES PATTERSON 
and this had led to a fight— a ""verbal disagreement"" —with 
Epstein. • 
She'd left without getting paid. Gone down to the kitchen 
and told Wendy, ""Let's go!"" 
""If you're uncomfortable,"" Wendy had told her, ""tell him to 
stop, and he will."" 
On the other hand, Wendy had also told her, ""The more you 
do, the more you get paid."" 
A few weeks later, she agreed to return to the house on El 
Brillo. 
Once again Sarah had taken Jenny upstairs and into the mas-
ter bedroom. Sarah had set up the massage table, laid out the oils 
that Jenny would use. 
Then Epstein had entered the room wearing only a towel. 
Jenny had been wearing tight jeans. She had a tight belt on. 
She kept the jeans on, though Epstein still made a grab for her 
buttocks. Then he rolled onto his back and grabbed for her 
breasts. Jenny became upset yet again. But this time, she was 
paid two hundred dollars before leaving. She never did go back 
to the house. But, like Francine, she has one more thing to tell 
the detectives. 
Another girl from her high school had been there on the day 
of her second visit with Epstein. Kristina. And later, Kristina 
told Jenny that she also had ""a problem"" with Epstein. 
Girls seemed to be turning up all the time. And the detec-
tives were just getting started. 
One girl leads Chief Reiter's team to another. And every time, 
they hear the same story. The girls are approached by Wendy 
70 
A 
1 
Dobbs. They drive ove: 
the kitchen—maybe sc 
they're walked upstair 
towel. Sometimes witl; 
mend their friends, anC 
None of the girls cc 
been trained as a mass1 
become a licensed mas: 
eighteen years old, at 
or GED. 
7ERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
""verbal disagreement"" —with 
d. Gone down to the kitchen 
.ndy had told her, ""tell him to 
ad also told her, ""The more you 
d to return to the house on El 
•enny upstairs and into the mas-
e massage table, laid out the oils 
e room wearing only a towel. 
:it jeans. She had a tight belt on. 
Epstein still made a grab for her 
his back and grabbed for her 
et again. But this time, she was 
-e leaving. She never did go back 
e, she has one more thing to tell 
school had been there on the day 
An. Kristina. And later, Kristina 
problem"" with Epstein. 
g up all the time. And the detec-
team to another. And every time, 
Le girls are approached by Wendy 
70 
Dobbs. They drive over to Epstein's house. After a short wait in 
the kitchen—maybe some milk and cereal, if they feel hungry—
they're walked upstairs. Epstein's there, waiting, wearing his 
towel. Sometimes with a vibrator. Sometimes the girls recom-
mend their friends, and for this they receive a commission. 
None of the girls comes from money. And none of them has 
been trained as a masseuse. Then again, how could they be? To 
become a licensed massage apprentice in Florida, you need to be 
eighteen years old, at least, and have a high school diploma 
or GED. 
She considered Epstei 
further and further ur 
telling him she had a I 
CHAPTER 16 
Cynthia: October 6, 2005 
Three days after meeting with Francine, the police drive to 
Boca Raton. They're there to see Cynthia Selleck, who's 
eighteen years old.* But according to the probable-cause 
affidavit that the Palm Beach PD is preparing in order to obtain 
an arrest warrant for Epstein, Cynthia was sixteen when Wendy 
Dobbs first took her to meet him. 
During a sworn taped statement, she tells the police that 
she'd met Wendy at her high school. She says that Wendy had 
recruited her and prepped her for her first visit to Epstein's 
house. And she says she'd ended up going to the house ""a lot of 
times to provide massages over the past two years."" The affidavit 
.-1 
--
states: 
* Cynthia SeHeck's name, some identifying details, and dialogue have been 
changed. 
72 
Only recently, Cynt 
clothes in the course of 
""Jeff would try to get 
sage,"" she tells the cops. 
Still, Sarah had Cyi 
would call whenever E1 
appointment for ""work."" 
Each time she went, . 
door area. She woulo 
massage table. [Cynt, 
questions about hers4 
player and would be al 
The cops want to kno 
[Cynthia] stated Epstei 
massage she provided 1 
October 1. 
That's less than a wee 
What the cops know i 
What they're about to 
FILTHY RICH 
She considered Epstein a pervert, and he kept pushing to go 
further and further until [Cynthia] explained she would keep 
telling him she had a boyfriend. 
CHAPTER 16 
rith Francine, the police drive to 
re to see Cynthia Selleck, who's 
according to the probable-cause 
) is preparing in order to obtain 
ynthia was sixteen when Wendy 
El. 
ement, she tells the police that 
chool. She says that Wendy had 
T for her first visit to Epstein's 
:d up going to the house ""a lot of 
the past two years."" The affidavit 
itifying details, and dialogue have been 
72 
Only recently, Cynthia says, did she begin to remove her 
clothes in the course of giving Epstein massages. 
""Jeff would try to get away with more and more on each mas-
sage,"" she tells the cops. 
Still, Sarah had Cynthia's cell phone number, and Sarah 
would call whenever Epstein was in Palm Beach to make an 
appointment for ""work."" 
Each time she went, Sarah would meet her at the kitchen 
door area. She would bring her upstairs and prepare the 
massage table. [Cynthia] advised Epstein would ask her 
questions about herself Epstein knew she was a soccer 
player and would be attending [a nearby] university. 
The cops want to know: Did Epstein know her real age? 
[Cynthia] stated Epstein did and didn't care. The most recent 
massage she provided was on October 1, 2005. 
October 1. 
That's less than a week ago. 
What the cops know now is that Epstein's still at it. 
What they're about to learn seals Epstein's fate. 
73 
CHAPTER 17 
Alison: October ii, 2005 
After speaking with Cynthia, Detectives Recarey and Daw-
son meet up, once again, with Alison. It's been exactly one 
month since her arrest, and once again, she's willing to talk. 
They have no trouble obtaining her sworn taped statement. 
Alison is eighteen, but she's been going to Epstein's house 
since 2002. Things got off to a slow start, she says. She received 
two hundred dollars for her first session, during which she had 
her bra off but her underwear on. Still, at the end of the session, 
Epstein had asked for her number. 
Then the sessions got heavier. Much heavier, as Detective Recarey 
already knew. [Alison] stated that during her many visits a routine was 
established between her and Epstein, he wrote in his report. 
She would enter the house and get naked in the bedroom. She 
would then start with a back massage. Epstein would roll on 
74 
to his back and allow he 
stated Epstein would the 
the same time would ii 
masturbate her with his 
[Alison] explained 1 
until he ejaculated. He 
sager on her vagina unti 
that during her frequen 
age, [and Alison] stated 
not to tell anyone her re 
escalated within the how, 
[Alison] to have interco 
Marcinhova [sic. 1. [Alisor 
using strap on dildos, 
devices that Epstein had 
them have intercourse ( 
ally, Epstein would then 
intercourse and provide 
cinkova. This occurred d 
years of age. 
[Alison] advised thi.! 
years. The routine becc 
assistant Sarah would tel 
in the Town of Palm Be( 
for her to visit and won. 
new was introduced, ad( 
offered for [Alison] to all( 
sented to perform all the. 
was an understanding wi 
tion would occur with 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 17 
hia, Detectives Recarey and Daw-
, with Alison. It's been exactly one 
tnd once again, she's willing to talk. 
her sworn taped statement. 
e's been going to Epstein's house 
slow start, she says. She received 
Lrst session, during which she had 
on. Still, at the end of the session, 
['her. 
r. Much heavier, as Detective Recarey 
at during her many visits a routine was 
em, he wrote in his report. 
and get naked in the bedroom. She 
ch massage. Epstein would roll on 
74 
to his back and allow her to massage his chest area. [Alison] 
stated Epstein would then begin to masturbate himself and at 
the same time would insert his fingers in her vagina and 
masturbate her with his fingers. 
[Alison] explained Epstein would continue this process 
until he ejaculated. He would then utilize a vibrator/mas-
sager on her vagina until [Alison] climaxed. [Alison] advised 
that during her frequent visits, Epstein asked for her real 
age, [and Alison] stated she was sixteen. Epstein advised her 
not to tell anyone her real age. [Alison] advised that things 
escalated within the home as Epstein would instruct and pay 
[Alison] to have intercourse with his female friend, Nada 
Marcinkova [sic]. [Alison] explained the intercourse included 
using strap on dildos, large rubber penisIsic] and other 
devices that Epstein had at his disposal. Epstein would watch 
them have intercourse and masturbate himself. Occasion-
ally, Epstein would then join in during the female on female 
intercourse and provide oral sex to both [Alison] and Mar-
cinkova. This occurred during the time [Alison] was sixteen 
years of age. 
[Alison] advised this continued to escalate during two 
years. The routine became familiar to [Alison]. Epstein's 
assistant Sarah would telephone her every time Epstein was 
in the Town of Palm Beach and would place appointments 
for her to visit and work for Epstein. Each time something 
new was introduced, additional monies were produced and 
offered for [Alison] to allow the acts to happen. [Alison] con-
sented to perform all these acts but was adamant that there 
was an understanding with Epstein that no vaginal penetra-
tion would occur with his penis. [Alison] explained that 
75 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Epstein's penis was deformed. [She] explained that his penis 
was oval shaped. [She] claimed when Epstein's penis was 
erect, it was thick toward the bottom but was thin and small 
toward the head portion. [She] called Epstein's penis 
""egg-shaped."" [She] stated Epstein would photograph Mar-
cinkova and her naked and having sex and proudly display 
the photographs within the home. [Alison] stated during one 
visit to Epstein's house in which she provided a massage to 
Epstein, his female friend, Nada [sic] Marcinkova, was also 
present. [Alison] provided the massage in which Marcinkova 
and her would fondle each other's breasts and kiss for Epstein 
to enjoy. Towards the end of this massage, Epstein grabbed 
[Alison] and turned her over onto her stomach on the mas-
sage table and forcibly inserted his penis into her vagina: 
[Alison] stated Epstein began to pump his penis in her 
vagina. [She] became upset over this. She said her head was 
being held against the table forcibly, as he continued to pump 
inside her. She screamed ""No!"" and Epstein stopped. She told 
him that she did not want to have his penis inside of her. 
Epstein did not ejaculate inside of her and apologized for his 
actions and subsequently paid her a thousand dollars for 
that visit. [Alison] stated she knows he still displays her pho-
tographs through out the house. 
What happened to Mary had been bad enough. But what hap-
pened to Alison was on a whole other level. She'd been caught 
with some pot, sure. But that was hardly a felony offense. It didn't 
make her a liar. And, in important respects, Alison's statement 
had aligned with Mary's and with statements they'd been given 
76 
by other girls, including 
Probably not. Almost ce 
also in line with what di 
Detective Recarey az 
on the investigation that 
It was enough, Reit( 
search warrant. 
CERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
ihe] explained that his penis 
d when Epstein's penis was 
Atom but was thin and small 
;he] called Epstein's penis 
tein would photograph Mar-
ving sex and proudly display 
qe. [Alison] stated during one 
:h she provided a massage to 
la [sic] Marcinkova, was also 
massage in which Marcinkova 
breasts and kiss for Epstein 
:his massage, Epstein grabbed 
onto her stomach on the mas-
ted his penis into her vagina: 
m to pump his penis in her 
ver this. She said her head was 
rcibly, as he continued to pump 
1"" and Epstein stopped. She told 
o have his penis inside of her. 
de of her and apologized for his 
lid her a thousand dollars for 
knows he still displays her pho-
ise. 
been bad enough. But what hap-
ole other level. She'd been caught 
vas hardly a felony offense. It didn't 
Drtant respects, Alison's statement 
with statements they'd been given 
76 
by other girls, including Wendy Dobbs. Could Wendy be trusted? 
Probably not. Almost certainly not. But again, what she said was 
also in line with what the police had heard from other girls. 
Detective Recarey and his team had done exceptional work 
on the investigation that Officer Pagan had started. 
It was enough, Reiter decided, to cause a judge to issue a 
search warrant. 
77 
CHAPTER 18 
Michael Reiter: October 2005 
0 n October 20, Palm Beach police officers execute a search 
warrant, signed by Judge Laura Johnson, at Jeffrey Epstein's 
home on El Brillo Way. Inside the house, an employee is 
on the phone with Epstein. They ask him, politely, to hang up. 
Then, guns drawn, they walk up the winding stairs to the home's 
second story. 
Detective Recarey remains outside and reads the warrant, out 
loud, to Epstein's houseman while another officer videotapes them. 
""This is your copy,"" Recarey says as he hands over the war-
rant. ""When we are concluded, I will leave a list of what items 
we've taken, okay? I would ask that you don't answer your tele-
phone. I know that the gentleman was having a conversation 
with Mr. Epstein at the time. So I'm sure he's trying to call and 
find out what's going on. He will be told what was going on as 
soon as we're done. Okay?"" 
78 
Inside the house, del 
that Mary and other gir 
naked young girls—in sc 
Epstein. They also find n 
names, dates, and numbe 
Sometimes there are 
hers: ""I have girls for him 
These notes are signe 
Epstein's house has ; 
the bedrooms look alma 
off Epstein's bedroom, ti 
holding strange machin( 
find in a dermatologist's ( 
In a wood-colored ai 
bottle of peach-flavored 
soaps shaped like penis( 
more Joy Jelly, and boxes 
The officers find stacl 
and other B-list movies. 
They also find receipi 
SlaveCraft: Roadmaps for 
On the first floor, det 
hidden in clocks. On th 
photographs of Wendy 
come from the camera in 
The officers know wl 
install them—in 2004, 
had stolen a gun and $: 
investigated that case. 
man, Juan Alessi, for the 
CHAPTER 18 
05 
:h police officers execute a search 
Laura Johnson, at Jeffrey Epstein's 
Inside the house, an employee is 
.ey ask him, politely, to hang up. 
p the winding stairs to the home's 
putside and reads the warrant, out 
ile another officer videotapes them. 
says as he hands over the war-
I will leave a list of what items 
k that you don't answer your tele-
Leman was having a conversation 
So I'm sure he's trying to call and 
will be told what was going on as 
78 
FILTHY RICH 
Inside the house, detectives see the pink-and-green couch 
that Mary and other girls had described. They see photos of 
naked young girls—in some cases, girls they've spoken to about 
Epstein. They also find message pads on which are written first 
names, dates, and numbers for the girls. 
Sometimes there are notes to go with the names and num-
bers: ""I have girls for him."" Or ""I have 2 girls for him."" 
These notes are signed by one Sarah Kellen. 
Epstein's house has a strangely antiseptic quality. Some of 
the bedrooms look almost like doctors' offices. In the bathroom 
off Epstein's bedroom, there's a massage table as well as stands 
holding strange machines, which looked like something you'd 
find in a dermatologist's office. 
In a wood-colored armoire beside Epstein's bed, they see a 
bottle of peach-flavored Joy Jelly. In the bathroom, there are 
soaps shaped like penises and vaginas, bottles of Mango Mist, 
more Joy Jelly, and boxes of tampons. 
The officers find stacks of UFC videos and DVDs of Rock Star 
and other B-list movies. 
They also find receipts for books bought on Amazon, such as 
SlaveCraft: Roadmaps for Erotic Servitude. 
On the first floor, detectives are drawn to two secret cameras 
hidden in clocks. On the computer hard drive, they see several 
photographs of Wendy and other girls. These images appear to 
come from the camera inside the clock behind Epstein's desk. 
The officers know where the cameras are because they helped 
install them—in 2004, when Epstein complained that someone 
had stolen a gun and $2,700 from him. Detective Recarey had 
investigated that case. But before he could arrest Epstein's handy-
man, Juan Alessi, for the theft, Epstein contacted a captain in the 
79 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Palm Beach PD and prevailed upon him to have the investigation 
called off. 
Epstein had met Alessi at a luncheonette, he explained, and 
Alessi had agreed to pay back the money. At the time, it made no 
sense to prosecute: Epstein was a busy man. He was going to get 
his money. But he did invite the police into his home to install 
the cameras. This was a service that the Palm Beach PD provided 
(though Epstein would be the only one with access to the foot-
age). But while they were there, the police had noticed a group of 
attractive young women who seemed to be camped out at the 
house. 
The group included Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova. 
None of the girls was a relative of Epstein— that fact had 
caught the cops' attention. 
And now, as the search continues, the cops see photographs 
of the very same girls. 
On Epstein's desk, the officers find Alison's high school 
transcript. 
The thing is, the detectives can't shake the feeling that the 
Epstein house has been tidied up for their arrival. Shelves look 
as though they've been emptied, and several photographs appear 
to have been removed from the walls. 
""[Judging] by the condition of the place to be searched,"" 
Chief Reiter will say in his deposition for B.B. vs. Epstein, ""some-
one probably had cleaned it up a bit."" 
Maybe there's nothing too surprising about this. After all, 
Reiter's team knows that Epstein's gotten wind of their investiga-
tion. What is surprising is that for a house that's been scrubbed, 
there's so much left lying around. 
In fact, the oddest thing about the search is that someone,* 
80 
appears to have gone 
nating materials, but 
It was as if the th 
ister as wrong. 
There's another feelii 
that they themselves 
First Reiter hears 
yers have hired prii 
checks. 
A public-records 
Reiter's own records. 
Detective Recare) 
and that his trash ha. 
In his entire car( 
that Reiter's seen or 
ing his investigators. 
ey's doing great wonl 
and for good reason 
Right now, more vic. 
now that the warra) 
interviewing Epstein 
FILTHY RICH 
ERSON 
him to have the investigation 
icheonette, he explained, and 
noney. At the time, it made no 
3u5y man. He was going to get 
)olice into his home to install 
at the Palm Beach PD provided 
ly one with access to the foot-
Le police had noticed a group of 
rned to be camped out at the 
Lien and Nadia Marcinkova. 
tive of Epstein— that fact had 
.nues, the cops see photographs 
.cers find Alison's high school 
can't shake the feeling that the 
ap for their arrival. Shelves look 
, and several photographs appear 
walls. 
,n of the place to be searched,"" 
psition for B.B. vs. Epstein, ""some-
a bit."" 
surprising about this. After all, 
in's gotten wind of their investiga-
for a house that's been scrubbed, 
ad. 
about the search is that someone 
80 
appears to have gone through the house, gotten rid of incrimi-
nating materials, but left many clues behind. 
It was as if the things the police were seeing didn't even reg-
ister as wrong. 
There's another feeling the cops can't shake: the nagging sense 
that they themselves are being investigated and tailed. 
First Reiter hears through the grapevine that Epstein's law-
yers have hired private investigators to perform background 
checks. 
A public-records demand has been filed in an effort to obtain 
Reiter's own records. 
Detective Recarey tells Reiter that he, too, is being surveilled 
and that his trash has been picked through. 
In his entire career as a police officer, this is the first time 
that Reiter's seen or heard of such a thing: a suspect investigat-
ing his investigators. But for the moment, he puts it aside. Recar-
ey's doing great work on the investigation. He's deeply invested, 
and for good reason: the detective's got four kids of his own. 
Right now, more victims are coming out of the woodwork. And 
now that the warrant's been executed, there's no downside to 
interviewing Epstein's servants. 
81 
CHAPTER 19 
Detective Recarey, Probable-Cause Affidavit: 
May 2006 
On November 21, 2005 I interviewed Jose [sic] Alessi, a for-
mer houseman for Jeffrey Epstein. Alessi stated he was 
employed for eleven years with Mr. Epstein, from approxi-
mately 1993 through 2004. Alessi stated he was the house 
manager, driver and house maintenance person. It was his 
responsibility to prepare the house for Epstein's arrival. 
When asked about cooks or assistants, Alessi stated they 
traveled with Epstein on his private plane. I asked Mr. Alessi 
about the massages that have occurred at. Epstein's home. 
Alessi stated Epstein receives three massages a day. Each 
masseuse that visited the house was different. Alessi stated 
that towards the end of his employment, the masseuses were 
younger and younger. When asked how young, Mr. Alessi 
stated they appeared to be sixteen or seventeen years of age 
82 
at the most. The m( 
or bathroom. He kr 
sage tables. I asked 
massage. Alessi sta 
of his employment 
sager/vibrator and 
sink after the mass( 
almost always have 
On January 4, 
man, Mr. Alfredo I 
ment, Mr. Rodrigu 
Epstein for approxii 
through May of 20C 
included being the b 
run errands for Ep 
asked Rodriguez 
Rodriguez stated E, 
Epstein would have 
massage in the aft 
Rodriguez stated h( 
and make them co 
Epstein would meet 
masseuses would or 
kitchen area and of) 
would then be encou 
They would be taker 
Rodriguez if any of 
Rodriguez stated th 
too young to be mass 
direction, he deliver, 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 19 
-Cause Affidavit: 
-viewed Jose [sic] Alessi, a for-
42stein. Alessi stated he was 
th Mr. Epstein, from approxi-
Oessi stated he was the house 
laintenance person. It was his 
e house for Epstein's arrival. 
assistants, Alessi stated they 
Private plane. I asked Mr. Alessi 
ye occurred at Epstein's home. 
three massages a day. Each 
luse was different. Alessi stated 
mployment, the masseuses were 
ri asked how young, Mr. Alessi 
ixteen or seventeen years of age 
82 
at the most. The massages would occur in Epstein's bedroom 
or bathroom. He knew this because he often set up the mas-
sage tables. I asked if there were things going on other than a 
massage. Alessi stated that there were times towards the end 
of his employment that he would have to wash off a mas-
sager/vibrator and a long rubber penis, which were in the 
sink after the massage. Additionally, he stated the bed would 
almost always have to be made after the massage. 
On January 4, 2006 I interviewed another former house-
man, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez. During a sworn taped state-
ment, Mr. Rodriguez stated he was employed by Jeffrey 
Epstein for approximately six months, from November 2004 
through May of 2005. His responsibilities as house manager 
included being the butler, chauffeur, chef, houseman [and to] 
run errands for Epstein and provide for Epstein's guests. I 
asked Rodriguez about masseuses corning to the house. 
Rodriguez stated Epstein would have two massages a day. 
Epstein would have one massage in the morning and one 
massage in the afternoon everyday he was in residence. 
Rodriguez stated he would be informed to expect someone 
and make them comfortable until either Sarah Kellen- or 
Epstein would meet with them. Rodriguez stated once the 
masseuses would arrive, he would allow them entry into the 
kitchen area and offer them something to drink or eat. They 
would then be encountered by either Sarah Kellen or Epstein. 
They would be taken upstairs to provide the massage. I asked 
Rodriguez if any of the masseuses appeared young in age. 
Rodriguez stated the girls that would come appeared to be 
too young to be masseuses. He stated one time under Epstein's 
direction, he delivered a dozen roses to [Mary's high school] 
83 
JAMES PATTERSON 
for one of the girls that came to provide a massage. He knew 
the girls were still in high school and were of high school age. 
I asked Rodriguez about the massages. He felt there was a lot 
more going on than just massages. 
He would often clean Mr. Epstein's bedroom after the 
alleged massages and would discover massagers/vibrators 
and sex toys scattered on the floor. He also said he would 
wipe down the vibrators and sex toys and put them away in 
an armoire. He described the armoire as a small wood 
armoire which was on the wall close to Epstein's bed. On one 
occasion Epstein ordered Rodriguez to go to the Dollar rent a 
car and rent a car for the same girl he brought the roses to, so 
that she could drive her self to Epstein's house without inci-
dent. Rodriguez said the girl always needed rides to and 
from the house. 
Rodriguez produced a green folder which contained doc-
uments, and a note with Mr. Epstein's stationery with direc-
tion to deliver a bucket of roses to (Mary's] High School after 
fa] high school drama performance. . . . 
During the course of the investigation, subpoenas were 
obtained for cell phone and home phone records from several 
victims and witnesses along with the cell phone records of 
Sarah Kellen. An analysis of these records was conducted 
which found numerous telephone calls were made between 
Sarah Kellen and the victims. These records indicate the 
dates the calls were made are consistent with the dates and 
times the victims/witnesses stated they were contacted. Spe-
cifically, the phone records showed Kellen called [Wendy 
Dobbs] during the exact times and dates when [name 
redacted] advised the incident occurred. Kellen also coordi-
84 
nated the encounters 
frame the girls stated 
Pursuant to a 
vate plane records fi 
records show arrivai 
Palm Beach Internati 
pared to the cell phon4 
ison found that all th 
and the victims were 
arrival or during the 
Therefore, as Jeff 
incidents was fifty on 
course either with i 
redacted], who were n 
is sufficient probable 
four counts of Unlawft 
lation of Florida State 
ony. As Epstein, who a 
years of age, did use a 
of [name redacted], a j 
cient probable cause ti 
ous Molestation, in vio 
(5), a second degree fel 
FILTHY RICH 
ERSON 
9rovide a massage. He knew 
and were of high school age. 
;sages. He felt there was a lot 
s. 
Epstein's bedroom after the 
liscover massagers/vibrators 
floor. He also said he would 
toys and put them away in 
armoire as a small wood 
close to Epstein's bed. On one 
guez to go to the Dollar rent a 
girl he brought the roses to, so 
Epstein's house without inci-
always needed rides to and 
en folder which contained doc-
Epstein's stationery with direc-
s to [Mary's] High School after 
nance.... 
investigation, subpoenas were 
9me phone records from several 
with the cell phone records of 
).1 these records was conducted 
phone calls were made between 
ms. These records indicate the 
re consistent with the dates and 
stated they were contacted. Spe-
showed Kellen called (Wendy 
times and dates when (name 
nt occurred. Kellen also coordi-
nated the encounters with [name redacted] during the time 
frame the girls stated they occurred. 
Pursuant to a lawful subpoena I obtained Epstein's pri-
vate plane records for 2005 from Jet Aviation. The plane 
records show arrival and departure of Epstein's plane at 
Palm Beach International airport. These records were com-
pared to the cell phone records of Sarah Kellen. This compar-
ison found that all the phone calls Kellen made to [Dobbs] 
and the victims were made in the days just prior to their 
arrival or during the time Epstein was in Palm Beach. 
Therefore, as Jeffrey Epstein, who at the time of these 
incidents was fifty one years of age, did have vaginal inter-
course either with his penis or digitally with [names 
redacted], who were minors at the time this occurred, there 
is sufficient probable cause to charge Jeffrey Epstein with 
four counts of Unlawful Sexual Activity with a Minor, in vio-
lation of Florida State Statute 794.05(1), a second degree fel-
ony. As Epstein, who at the time of the incident was fifty two 
years of age, did use a vibrator on the external vaginal area 
of [name redacted], a fourteen year old minor, there is suffi-
cient probable cause to charge him with Lewd and Lascivi-
ous Molestation, in violation of Florida State Statute 800.04 
(5), a second degree felony. 
84 85 
PART II 
The Man 
Wit 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022187.txt,"From: 111111111111.11111 < 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Importance: 
Fyi 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:08 PM 
JEE 
Fwd: CNN Inquiry 
High 
From: Melanie Hicken <hit-reply@linkedin.com> 
Date: October 13, 2016 at 8:03:22 PM GMT+2 
To:________________ 
Subject: CNN Inquiry 
Reply-To: Melanie Hicken <59d7d715-38e6-4332-9945-5076dffc7f28@reply.linkedin.com> 
Hi 
I'm a reporter at CNN, and my colleague Blake Ellis and I have read that Bill Clinton and Donald 
Trump have both visited Epstein's private island. We are trying to determine whether there is any 
truth to the allegations that either or both of these men may have had sexual relations with minors 
while there. We know that you have been Epstein's pilot, so we're wondering if you would be willing 
to speak with us completely off the record. We are not focusing on the allegations against Epstein --
we are solely focusing on Trump and Clinton given the current allegations being levied in the press. 
If you don't feel comfortable sharing anything via social media or email, feel free to send us any 
documentation/proof that might be helpful anonymously via mail: 
Melanie Hicken 
6430 Sunset Blvd #300 
Los Angeles, CA 90028 
You can also reach us by phone: 
Thanks so much, 
Melanie 
Not 
interested 
View Melanie's Linked In profile 
You are receiving InMail notification emails. Unsubscribe 
1 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022187 
This email was intended for 
. Learn why we included this. 
If you need assistance or have questions, please contact LinkedIn Customer Service. 
© 2016, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 
2 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022188 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014693.txt,"2015 FLORIDA NOP FOR PROM T CORBORA TOR AMINE ANNUAle? CVO6/L7 Page fens 4

REPORT Apr 22, 2015
DOCUMENT# N14000011657 Secretary of State
Entity Name: VICTIMS REFUSE SILENCE, INC. CC7801725405

Current Principal Place of Business:

425 NORTH ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

Current Mailing Address:

425 NORTH ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301

FEI Number: 47-2627774 Certificate of Status Desired: Yes
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:

EDWARDS, BRADLEY J
425 NORTH ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 US

The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida.
SIGNATURE:

Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date

Officer/Director Detail :

Title PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR Title VP, DIRECTOR

Name GIUFFRE, VIRGINIA L Name GARVIN, MARGARET A

Address 425 NORTH ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 Address 425 NORTH ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2
City-State-Zip: FFORTLAUDERDALE FL 33301 City-State-Zip: FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33301

Title SECRETARY, DIRECTOR

Name HENDERSON, BRITTANY N

Address 425 NORTH ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2

City-State-Zip: FORTLAUDERDALE FL 33301

| hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under
oath; that | am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears

above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered.
SIGNATURE: BRITTANY N HENDERSON DIRECTOR 04/22/2015

Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date

GIUFFRE001065

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014693
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031255.txt,"From: Lawrence Kraus sj

Sent: 12/11/2017 5:18:30 PM

To: Peter Aldhous

cc: matthew.schafe i=

Subject: Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment

Attachments: image002.png

Importance: — High

I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. I am currently on a plane until noon pacific time, and then
heading to a meeting right after landing, till about 2 pm or so. While I am running the risk that you will report
my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete,
as I always try and do with reporters. If you decide to go ahead with a story, which, after reading my responses,
I hope you decide is inappropriate, I would like you to quote my responses fully in order not to distort them.

It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading
statements. I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students,
colleagues, and members of the general public, and this is supported by the institutions of which Iam a part. I
do not sexually harass people. Ifthe purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other
institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the
opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens
me up to a host of unfounded outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which
the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have
been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which
have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that their experience validates a trust in my
behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and continue to be invited to their last 3 meetings to
speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my
talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to
impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your
‘miscellaneous facts’, as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than
allegations and innuendo by people whose motives I cannot judge. I also try and judge the facts in context. The
fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is
because they value my contributions and my actions.

The items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where
we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there
were respectful and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves
an anonymous 3rd party claim because I know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was
not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I
decided I didn’t want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part
did not happen. Re incident 5: The ‘female companion’ in this case is my wife, who accompanied me on the
cruise, and has attested to the fact that the claim is false. This is what I wrote at the time in response to the blog
in question, causing it to be taken down.

It is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,

Re item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came
to me, asked me to talk over coffee, or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after
graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested
in going on to graduate school in physics, but she was interested in science communication so IJ told her that she
might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one
of these occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031255
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012044.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 12/9/2016 3:56:27 PM 
To: Ens, Amanda 
Subject: Re: Financials: buy XLF call spreads 
Attachments: image001.png 
Importance: High 
lets try, 250k premium 
Richard Kahn 
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ens, Amanda 
We continue to see further upside in financials. 
wrote: 
• Erika Najarian, BAML financials research analyst, just returned from a marketing trip. Bottom line: North 
American investors are very bullish the banks (long only AND hedge funds AND macro funds), but then conclude ""I 
don't own enough"". Note that high touch flows have slowed down significantly since Thanksgiving and where the 
buying has been concentrated in XLF (every client sector we have has been a better buyer of XLF). 
• Client focus: 
1) Regulation: Excitement, with the base case that it's not getting worse. 
2) Sentiment on rates: Cautiously bullish 
3) Sentiment on growth: Also bullish 
4) Sentiment on corporate tax rate cuts: buyside more bullish than sellside. In 1986, bank stocks exploded upward 
(outperforming the S&P) after Reagan's tax reform bill passed the Senate; and 2) in 2003, the last time we saw personal 
tax cuts, loan growth industry wide accelerated in 2003 and 2004. 
• Biggest Pushback on owning sector at current levels: Too far too fast: BKX +18.00% post election: Valuation 
coming into question and 04 has typically been a seasonally weak qtr. Bulls defend valuation on '18ests with potential 
upside to 2018 [PS from —25-40% and stocks still cheap vs. discretionary. 
• Price action and sentiment keeps us constructive, we like the long and would expect US financials to benefit from 
any beta chase into year end. 
• How to play it? We still like ""appearing"" call spreads on XLF 
o Buy a 6 month 105% call with a short 110% call that knock in if XLF trades above 115% during the life of the trade 
for 1.75% premium cost 
• Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.8x (5.0%/1.75%) 
• Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.6x (9.9%/1.75%) — you have upside up to 114.9% 
Regards, 
Amanda 
Amanda Ens 
Director Global Equities 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012044 
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated 
One Bryant Park 15th Floor New York, NY 10036 
Phone: Mobile 
From: Ens, Amanda 
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:15 PM 
To: 'jeffrey E.'; Rich Kahn 
Subject: Financials: buy XLF call spreads 
Underweight positioning, buybacks resuming, positive momentum and strong fundamentals all indicate that there is 
still further upside potential in financials (more details below). Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have 
another 20-25% upside given the many levers to the Trump Trade: less regulation, higher interest rates, higher vol, 
economic growth, loan growth, etc. The asset sensitive regional banks are more of a pure play on a rates move but we 
view the larger cap banks as having multi-pronged upside given the aforementioned points. 
That said, given the velocity and magnitude of the recent move and uncertainty around the impact and timing of 
Trump's policies, we believe options offer better risk-reward than being outright long financials stocks here. With flat 
call skew, ""appearing"" call spreads with upside knock-ins price well. 
Buy a 1 year XLF call spread for 2.6% premium 
• Buy a 110% call 
• Sell a 117.5% call with an at-expiry knock-in at 125% (call is not active unless XLF is 125% or higher at expiry) 
o Total premium is 2.6% 
o Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.9x (7.5%/2.6%) 
o Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.7x (14.9%/2.6%) — you have upside up to 124.9% 
Post Election Flow Skews - Buyers of Health Care (via ETFs) and Financials (mainly ETFs) 
• US Buyback Flows 
• Cons Disc, Technology and Financials are the largest 3 sectors for US buybacks (over 70% of execution). We 
are seeing a seasonal increase in buybacks as we come out of the low seasonal month of the year (October) and should 
see increased buyback executions until year-end, another source of upside for the Cons Disc, Technology and Financials  
sectors.  
Global Positioning, Nigel Tupper, 11/14. Large long-only funds are more underweight Financials than any other 
sector and are UW this sector in all regions. 
Future of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are 
raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining 
after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2) 
potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration; 
and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian) 
Trades Gaining Momentum: Finance-Related Assets vs. S&P 500 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012045 
In the period since the US presidential election, the three top-performing S&P sectors and industry groups have all 
been finance-related (Banks, Financials, Diversified Financials) 
Trades Gaining Momentum: Finance-Rdalhad Midi VS. SIP SOO 
J-Cal .4).1ornbour .20 
Mmunelsis 
11/3/111 
11/S/III 
11,rvis 
11/11/111 11111M 1311S/111 11/17/11 
11/1/11 
Tqchnatves 
SWIM 
Source: Kensho Technologies 
The Flow Show, Michael Hartnett, 11/18. Violent rotation: record equity ETF inflow, record financials inflow, biggest 
bond outflow in 3.5 yrs, record EM debt outflow. 
Regards, 
Amanda 
Amanda Ens 
Director Global Equities 
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated 
One Bryant Park 15th Floor New York, NY 10036 
Phone: Mobi1e 
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at 
http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this 
message. 
please note 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012046 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012047 
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023081.txt,"This policy would effectively result in the tax authorities recognizing all sales that take
place in the US (regardless of where they are produced) and all the domestic costs
incurred to produce goods and services for customers (regardless of where the sale
takes place). As a result, net importers (such as many retailers) would suffer, as they
would have to pay taxes on their domestic sales without being able to deduct a
significant portion of their costs of production. Conversely, net exporters (companies
with much of their production in the US but sales outside of the US) would stand to
benefit from not having to pay taxes on their foreign sales while being able to deduct a
significant proportion of production costs (Exhibit 3). Purely domestic companies would
be unaffected.

Exhibit 3: Illustration of border adjustment treatment of US corporate taxation

US Non-US
Sold in the US:

Recognize sales Made in the US:
Deduct costs

Sold overseas:
ignore sales

&
os

Sold overseas

Ignore sles

. =,
Made in the U3,
Deduct costs

Made overseas:
Made overseas: Can’t deduct costs
Can’t deduct costs

Sold in the OS:
Recognize sales

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch US Equity & US Quant Strategy

Even if border adjustments are enacted, there is significant uncertainty around
implementation details. For this analysis, we focus on the first order impact of border
adjustments, but we recognize there would be significant second order impacts on the
pricing of products, pricing within the supply chain, foreign exchange rates as well as
foreign policy reactions. (We discuss many of these second order impacts later in this
report.) For the current exercise, we also ignored the cost of services as the
implementation of these rules would be more complicated. See the Methodology
section for more details.

We estimate that at a 20% tax rate, border adjustments would detract $5-6 from 2018
EPS, with nearly 80% of the drag coming from the Consumer Discretionary and
Consumer Staples sectors (roughly evenly split). This impact includes a 50% haircut to
account for offsets from alternate sourcing, currency rates and pricing power. On one
hand, we may be drastically underestimating the impact because we have not included
the second order impacts on the supply chain. For example, many retailers source the
bulk of their goods from domestic suppliers, who source their goods from overseas
suppliers. So while the original retailer may not feel the direct tax hit from importing
goods, the supplier that took the tax hit would likely pass along a significant portion of
this via a higher cost. On the other hand, the supplier or the retailer could look for
alternate domestic sources for those products, but it would largely depend on whether
the cost differential of production between the US and overseas exceeded the border
adjustment tax. Some key components in determining the cost differential are the
foreign exchange rates (more on this below) and labor costs. In the end, the net impact
of the border adjustment taxes will be driven by a complex interplay between corporate
tax rates, pricing power, foreign exchange moves, foreign versus domestic availability
and cost differentials.

Bankof America

Merrill Lynch Equity Strategy Focus Point | 29 January 2017s: 13

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023081
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012413.txt,"coo

wb

oO O OA 4 Oo eF WwW NH

—

& WwW NY

~0929104. TXT
21

the record anywhere?

BY MR. TEIN:

Q.

Let me ask you, | | did you in fact

write your friend this message about this deposition?

A.

Yes.

A. Yes.

Q. Because you think this deposition is stupid
court s-h-j-t, don't you?

A. No.

Q. You wrote that to your friend, didn't you?

A. Yes.

Q. You think that court is stupid, don't you?

A. In some cases.

Q. And you think that court is bull s-h-i-t,
don't you?

A. No.

Q. And you think this deposition is bul!
s-h-i-t, don't you?

A. No.

Q. You wrote that to your friend, didn't you?

MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and
answered.
MR. TEIN: That's not an objection.
22

BY MR. TEIN:

Q. You wrote that to your friend, didn't you?

MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and

answered, for the fourth time.

Page 18

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012413
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018244.txt,"ceiling, penknife jabbed into his leg, Su Qin had learned in those long, effortful years
of study? What secret had he penetrated? What sort of education had he finally
received at the end of his humiliations and breakthroughs? He had mastered the
energy of his age - and the exact right sensibility to use it. Might we, Nan seemed to
be asking, do the same?

7.

Faced with the mad unsettling of his world during the Industrial Revolution of the
mid 19 century, the German philosopher Friederich Nietzsche once mused that
survival and greatness would depend on having what he called a “Sixth Sense”, by
which he meant a feeling for history. Surely, he felt, an instinct for ancient balances
and truths would provide a guide rail of sorts as the world lurched into a new age,
along an uncharted road.? If you could say “This has happened before” or “This is
how we got to where we are,” Nietzsche believed, it was the first step towards
knowing where to go next. Nan and Kissinger knew the need for something else for
our age as well, for a different instinct. It wasn’t just about knowing your history or
feeling the real possibility of human progress or tragedy. Rather it was about feeling
out the roots of the present in a certain way. All of our ideas - from how we love to
what we think of politics - are taken from the feedback and experience of our lives,
from what we've seen and done and felt and learned. We are the sum total of our
experiences, in this sense. But what to do if changes happen at some deeper,
insensible level where the old ideas and instincts, where the tools of sight and smell,
of feel and taste and hearing don’t fully answer? What to do when we are confronted
with what we've never experienced before? Never even dreamed of, perhaps?

This book is the story of a completely fresh way of feeling our world. By this I mean
a sensation that is as newborn as the lively sense of connection, of freedom, of
electric uncertainty and hope that come with the knowledge that we are unboxing a
new age. If Nietzsche’s era demanded a feeling for history, our own age insists ona

3 Surely, he felt: Nietzche describes the “Sixth Sense” in Beyond Good and Evil in the
following way: “The historical sense (or the capacity for divining quickly the order
of rank of the evaluations according to which a people, a society, a human being has
lived, the ‘divinatory instinct’ for the relationships of these evaluations, for the
relation of the authority of values to the authority of effective forces): this historical
sense, to which we Europeans lay claim as our specialty, has come to us in the wake
of the mad and fascinating semi-barbarism into which Europe has been plunged
through the democratic mingling of classes and races—only the nineteenth century
knows this sense, as its sixth sense. The past of every form and mode of life, of
cultures that formerly lay close beside or on top of one another, streams into us
“modern souls” thanks to this mingling, our instincts now run back in all directions,
we ourselves are a kind of chaos. In the end, as I said before, ‘the spirit’ perceives its
advantage in all this.” See Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche and Rolf Horstmann. Beyond
Good and Evil Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future, (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2002), 224.

12

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018244
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025338.txt,"What is the summer solstice? The
answer might surprise you.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025338
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017177.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

lately become —despite, perhaps even because of, the frequency and promiscuousness of its
invocation — little more than a caricature of logical argumentation. From the beginning of my
career as a First Amendment lawyer, I have taken aim at this analogy, both in my writings and in
my cases. In my view, it is one of the least persuasive, though most influential, arguments for
censorship that ever came from anyone’s pen!

The case that gave rise to the “Fire!’”’-in-a-crowded-theater analogy— Schenck v. United States—
involved the prosecution of Charles Schenck, who was the general secretary of the Socialist Party
in Philadelphia. In 1917 a jury found Schenck guilty of attempting to cause insubordination
among soldiers who had been drafted to fight in the First World War. He had circulated leaflets
urging draftees not to “submit to intimidation” by fighting in a war being conducted on behalf of
“Wall Street’s chosen few.” Schenck admitted that the intent of the pamphlet’s “impassioned
language” was to “influence” draftees to resist the draft. Nothing in the pamphlet suggested that
the draftees should use unlawful or violent means to oppose conscription. As Justice Holmes
found: “In form at least [the pamphlet] confined itself to peaceful measures, such as a petition for
the repeal of the act” and an exhortation to exercise “your right to assert your opposition to the
draft.” Many of the pamphlet’s words were quoted directly from the Constitution. It would hard
to . Aclear case of petitioning one’s government for a redress of grievances, which is
explicitly protected by the worlds of the First Amendment.

Holmes also acknowledged that “in many places and in ordinary times the defendants, in saying all
that was said in the circular, would have been within their constitutional rights.” “But,” he added,
“the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is

done.” And to illustrate that truism he went on to say, “The most stringent protection of free
speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater, and causing a panic.”

Justice Holmes upheld the convictions, finding that the pamphlet created “a clear and present
danger” of hindering the war effort while our soldiers were fighting for their lives and our liberty.

The example of shouting “Fire!” obviously bore little relationship to the facts of the Schenck case.
The Schenck pamphlet contained a political message—a series of ideas and arguments. It urged
its draftee readers to think about the message and then — if they so chose — to act on it ina
lawful and nonviolent way. The man who shouts “Fire!” in a theater is neither sending a political
message nor inviting his listener to think about what he has said and decide what to do in a
rational, calculated manner. On the contrary, the message is designed to force action without
contemplation. The shout of “Fire!” is directed not to the mind and the conscience of the listener
but, rather, to his adrenaline and his feet. It is a stimulus to immediate action, not thoughtful
reflection.

> The core analogy is the nonverbal alarm, and the derivative example is the verbal shout. By cleverly substituting
the derivative shout for the core alarm, Holmes made it possible to analogize one set of words to another—as he

90

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017177
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015566.txt,"Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 11 of 23

V: In a roundabout way, yes. In so many ways, Jeffrey really really had to train me, and that
was why Ghislaine said that she and Jeffrey enjoyed me so much was because they never
really had to speak much to me to tell me what they wanted me to do. You know, I
wasn’t waiting for you know, their directions. Jeffrey would tell me to go give an erotic
massage to friends. He wouldn’t give me much detail about it, but he would say to treat
them like you treat me.

JS: Did he refer to it as an erotic massage or are those your words?

V: Erotic massage is my words. That’s exactly what it was, but he would tell me to treat
them how he wanted it, so I'd do what he wanted without having to say to me words
more. I mean, I complied with what he wanted because it was somewhat of a, I don’t
know, I don’t know how to say it, it was just very mindboggling how I let him have so
much control or power over me basically. The massages would be routine to what Jeffrey
wanted with my so called new clientele, and with their own words would ask me to
provide them with sexual pleasure after the massage.

JS: Did you ever report back to Jeffrey about what happened when you provided massages to
his friends?

V: Of course, of course, and I knew that his friends were reporting back to him as well
because there were times where he would instigate conversation by saying you know, so
and so had a great time, you did wonderful, you know so and so gave me a call and told
J.E how it went_...

JS: Did Jeffrey ever elicit details from you? “Tell me what happened, describe in detail what
went on?”

V: No, but he would have a laugh, he had a laugh with me a few times about some of their
different mannerisms, I guess you would say, like some of them, one guy had a foot
fetish and that was really weird and I mentioned it to Jeffrey, and we would have a laugh
over it. He didn’t want to know details. He wasn’t asking me “so tell me what did you
guys do exactly.” No, he just basically gave me a slap on the back and said, you know,
good job. And we had some kind of conversation about it. I can’t recall any conversation
off the top of my head. I really don’t know one. It’s been that long. But yeah, we did
talk about it briefly.

JS: Can you give me an estimate as to the number of friends for whom Jeffrey provided and
paid for your services?

V: There was about, you know, I don’t know, 8 guys possibly.

JS: | And are you able to name those people for me?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015566
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021234.txt,"The continuing recession and further steep job losses are wearing away the patience of Americans and raising doubts about Obama's
handling of the economy.

The share of Americans who believe the stimulus package will restore the economy slipped to 52 percent in late June, down from 59
percent two months earlier, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Vice President Joe Biden said the administration had ""misread"" how bad the economy was when it took office but that the stimulus
package would help the economy recovery and create jobs.

Senate Republican Leader Mich McConnell Friday called the stimulus plan a failure.

Obama said it takes time for the plan's money ""to get out the door"" to pay for roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects that will
create jobs ""because we are committed to spending it in a way that is effective and transparent.""

2 ok ok ok Ie ee ok ok Ik ee oe ok ok Ik a oe ok 2k ok Ie oe ok ok ok ak oe ok ok ok Ik oe ek ok OK KKK DOT SCLA TIMER * ® & & & 2% eo ok Ie a ek ok ok Ie oe oe ok ok ok Ik oe ok ok ok Ik I oe

KK RK KKK KK

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and contain privileged or
opyright
nformation. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or use
his email

er
i

t

or the information contained in it for any purpose other than to notify us of the receipt
thereof.
a
d
e

ft you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, and
elete this
mail from your system.

Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change.The sender shall not be liable for the
improper

or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication,nor for any
delay in

its receipt or damage to your system.The sender does not guarantee that this material is
free from

viruses or any other defects although due care has been taken to minimise the risk.
kk ek kk ek ek ee ek ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ek ek ek ek ke ek

KK KK KKK KK

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021234
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028255.txt,"/ BARAK / 121

But both Olmert and Tzipi soon fell prey to the same self-defeating temptation
that had worried me during the meandering war against Hizbollah. Our ground
incursion began a few days into the operation. The intention was to stay for a few
more days and then, responding to inevitable international appeals, call a halt to a
campaign that had already achieved nearly all of its targets. Perhaps wanting to
balance the failures in Lebanon there with “success” in Gaza, Olmert wanted us to
continue, and expand our attacks deeper into Gaza. I reminded him that we’d
agreed the aims beforehand. The longer we stayed, the less clear any gains would
be. Yes, our ground forces had so far faced virtually no resistance or casualties.
“But that’s because we’re outside the main populated areas,” I said. “The deeper
we get in, the better it will be for Hamas. They gain simply by surviving, like
Hizbollah.” Yet Olmert kept insisting that we’d succeeded so far, so let’s not stop.

It wasn’t until January 17, three weeks after the operation began, that we
announced a cease-fire. Militarily, the operation was a success. While Hamas
launched nearly 3,000 rockets into Israel in the year before our attack, there were
only 300 in the year that followed. But politically and diplomatically, the extra
week reduced, rather than helped, the chances of reaching an understanding for a
longer-term reduction of the attacks. To the extent there was any political gain, it
was to burnish Tzipi Livni’s credentials as a tough potential Prime Minister ahead
of the election. That was not her intent. Of all the politicians I’ve known, she is
among the least interested in such games, especially with lives at stake. But it was
one of the effects.

She won the election, in a photo finish, with opinion polls suggesting she’d
been effective in shaping the campaign as a choice “between Tzipi and Bibi.”
Kadima got 28 Knesset seats, to 27 for Bibi and the Likud, which gave her the first
crack at forming a government. There’s no way of disguising the fact that Labor’s
result in my first election back in charge was a disappointment. We went down six
seats, to 13. The big gainer was a far-right, stridently anti-Arab party called Yisrael
Beitenu, led by a former Likudnik named Avigdor Lieberman. Tzipi’s attempt to
form a coalition became less a political process than a contest between rival stalls
in a Middle Eastern bazaar. Bibi was holding parallel talks with the Orthodox
parties critical to assembling a parliamentary majority. He was matching and
raising every assurance of a ministerial seat or budgetary concession that Tzipi was
prepared to offer. In the end, she threw up her hands, saying she refused to draw
out a process which was not so much a negotiation as organized extortion. I am

407
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028255
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014678.txt,"Case 9:08a8e doF SO KAAS BEA er? QoumentiaaSdonted 9 Heeket oF age28 of 1 Page 2 of 10

On December 30, 2014, two other unnamed victims, Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4, moved
to join as petitioners in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21. (DE 280).
Petitioners (Jane Doe | and Jane Doe 2) support the Rule 21 Motion. (Id. at 11). Jane Doe 3 and
Jane Doe 4 argue that they “have suffered the same violations of their rights under the [CVRA]
as the” Petitioners, and they “desire to join in this action to vindicate their rights as well.” (Id. at
1). The Government vehemently opposes joinder under Rule 21. (DE 290). The Government
argues that Rule 15 is the proper procedural device for adding parties to an action, not Rule 21.
(Id. at 1).

“[O]Jut of an abundance of caution,” Petitioners filed a motion to amend their petition
under Rule 15, conforming the petition to the evidence and adding Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as
petitioners. (DE 311 at 2). The Government opposes the Rule 15 Motion as well. (DE 314).
Among other things, the Government argues that amending the petition to include Jane Doe 3
and Jane Doe 4 should be denied because of their undue delay in seeking to join the proceedings,
and the undue prejudice that amendment will cause. (Id.).

After considering the parties’ submissions and the proposed amended petition, the Court
finds that justice does not require amendment in this instance and exercises its discretion to deny
the amendment.

IL. Discussion

“The decision whether to grant leave to amend a complaint is within the sole discretion of
the district court.” Laurie v. Ala. Ct. Crim. Apps., 256 F.3d 1266, 1274 (11th Cir. 2001). “The
court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Justice does

not require amendment in several instances, “includ[ing] undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive

GIUFFRE002845

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014678
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027166.txt,"Time: 02/21/17 05:19:02 AM (509375942)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

FABIF1D2-60D2-4711-9843-28BD90E1008E

GUID:

(It's Melanie/seattl

Message:

02/21/17 05:19:32 AM

The mayo is doing

Time: (509375972)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No

GUID: B454F866-71ED-42B8-8AD6-128B1361A8A8

Message: Israel/MIT

sender:

Time: 02/21/17 05:20:09 AM (509376009)

Flags: 1126401
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8195430B-091F-4A63-9F04-9311F0CO78BO

mobile)

Message: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/02/moving-patient-data-messy

blockchain-help/amp/?client=safari

Time: 02/21/17 05:20:09 AM (509376009)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AC302F57-3EAC-43E5-B286-1872CF6683B8

Message: Seems like folks are trying.
Time: 02/21/17 05:25:29 AM (509376329)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: IEOAFA46-0717-4375-B543-84C9FCD58CBA

Message: https://www.weforum.org/communities/th

futur

of-blockchain

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027166
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025603.txt,"Date: Monday, May 6 2019 11:15 AM 
Subject: Re: $25K from ASU 
From: Joichi Ito <MIII> 
To: J <jeevacation@gmail.com >, 
What is the size of the gift? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On May 6, 2019, at 07:14, Joichi Ito < >wrote: 
Can he give a gift to me at MIT? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On May 6, 2019, at 06:56, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
yes, hes not beholden to ME too :). how should farkas give the money 
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM Joichi Ito ‹> wrote: 
That would be great. I've been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars. 
> On May 6, 2019, at 06:48, J <jeevacation@gmail.com > wrote: 
> i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. 
how are you >? 
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM Joichi Ito < > wrote: 
> Nice. 
> > On Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > 
> > https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html? action=c lick 
&module=Opinion &pgtype=Homepage  
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM Joi Ito < > wrote: 
> > I'm good. Good luck! 
> > 
> > - Joi 
> > 
> >> On Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men, 
the trump types . im your boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well 
> » 
> >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM Joi Ito ‹> wrote: 
> » Thanks! 
> >> 
> >>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:18 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >» 
> >>> No problem- Trying to get more black for you 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025603 
> >» 
> >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM Joi Ito < > wrote: 
> >>> Hey Jeffrey. 
> >» 
> >>> How are things? 
> >» 
> >>> Just to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your 
foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU. 
> >>> 
> >» Sorry... 
> >» 
>» - Joi 
> >» --
> >» please note 
> >>> The information contained in this communication is 
> >>> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
> >>> constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
> >>> the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
> >>> JEE 
> >>> Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
> >>> communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
> >>> and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
> >>> communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> >>> return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and 
> >>> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
> >>> including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
> » 
> » 
> » 
> » 
> » please note 
> >> The information contained in this communication is 
> >> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
> >> constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
> >> the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
> >> JEE 
> >> Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
> >> communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
> >> and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
> >> communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> >> return e-mail or by e-mail to ieevacationAgmail.com, and 
> >> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
> >> including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > please note 
> > The information contained in this communication is 
> > confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
> > constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
> > the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
> > JEE 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025604 
> > Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
> > communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
> > and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
> > communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> > return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and 
> > destroy this communication and all copies thereof 
> > including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
• please note 
> The information contained in this communication is 
> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
> constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
> the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
> JEE 
> Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
> communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
> and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and 
> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
> including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025605 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031676.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2/27/2018 12:14:26 AM 
To: Lawrence Krauss 
Subject: Re: sorry 
Attachments: image002.png 
concentrate on your point by point refutation. . article on women agreeing on seeing flying saucers. . does 
not make the claim real. break the charges into ludicrous. ogling. jokes. . etc. . nancy language in her 
tweets. stirred up emotion. . 
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Lawrence Krauss < wrote: 
They claimed they had 1500 hits for their announcement about me and buzzfeed, which doesn't seem like a lot, 
but they thought so, and they are getting pressure from various of their supporters and senior people.. this 
three week thing may be true, but I wonder if I will ever really recover.. I wish they would indict Trump or 
something right now.. 
Lawrence M. Krauss 
Director, The Origins Project at ASU 
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative 
Foundation Professor 
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department 
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 
Research Office __________________ Assistant 
Origins Office 
origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu 
Origins Project 10 Year Celebration 
Be a part of something 10 years in the making! 
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info 
if-Mt 9Torilains 
Arizona State University 
On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:06 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
yikes 
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Lawrence Krauss wrote: 
I had my call with the Bulletin, I am going to take a voluntary leave as Chair of the Board.. allowing me and them to make nice 
statements about me and how the board appreciates me, has never had a complaint, how professional I am, and how they hope I will 
return after this has subsided.. The alternative was worse. 
Lawrence M. Krauss 
Director, The Origins Project at ASU 
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative 
Foundation Professor 
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department 
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031676 
Research Office 
Origins Office 
I Assistant 
origins.asu.edu I twitter.corn/Ikrauss1 I krauss.facultv.asu edu 
-Origins Project 10 Year Celebration 
Be a part of something 10 years in the making! 
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info 
<image002.png> 
On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:00 PM, jeffrey E. leevacation©gmail.com> wrote: 
no rush, this is not going away soon :) 
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Lawrence Krauss <lawkrauss@dmail.com> wrote: 
I am really occupied with stuff here.. will see when I can get around to writing something. 
LMK 
Lawrence M. Krauss 
Director, The Origins Project at ASU 
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative 
Foundation Professor 
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department 
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 
Research Office I Assistant (Jessica) 
origins office (Cv thia): 
origins.asu.e u I twitter.corn/Ikraussi. I krauss.faculty.asu.edu  
-Origins Project 10 Year Celebration 
Be a part of something 10 years in the making! 
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info 
<image002.png> 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@dmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031677 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@dmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031678 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012898.txt,"From: Tonja Haddad Coleman (i

Sent: 5/13/2013 10:28:30 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]; Darren Indyke ii); Debbie Fein

|; ee

Importance: — High
Farmer Jaffe is suing Donald Trump!

http://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/business/lawsuit-lobbed-against-trumps-ownership-of-former-
/[nXjjQ/?icm p=pbp_internallink_in¥itationbox_apr2013_pbpstu btomypbp_launch

Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.
TONJA HADDAD, P.A.

Advocate Building

315 SE 7"" Street

Fort L rdale_ FL

This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL information intended only for use of the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, or an authorized employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this e-
mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail from your records. Thank you for your
cooperation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012898
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014231.txt,"Non
\

errrrrerrry Ts

he se pA Fi ny
Kwddaadaaaa

Ny

; Foe
Sher ey

au

OTT TT

8Ci184 10/01

AO CE,
base

he a tet eer tel denen

FOR

[IMPORTANT MESSAGE

A.M.

DATE _. TIME PLM.

M

| oF
PHONES < / J -~
MOBILE S i ve
fase | _[neweou |
|
|_|

WANTS TO SEE YOU | | RUSH
RETURNED YOUR CALL| | SPECIAL ATTENTION

iM
OF.

~ PHONES
MOBILE

|

|
wantsToseevou | Ruy | |
RevorneD your caur] | sPecuL ATTENTION |_|

MESSAGE

[IMPORTANT MESSAGE | |

IMPORTANT MESSAGE | |

lon SARAH

f DATE £ fd OOH rye AL BM.

§ PHONE/ GF FAIL EOE.

MOBILE

i
ml
mi

fT CAME TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN

| | WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH
|. FRETURNED YOUR CALL mm SPECIAL ATTENTION

MESSAGE.

 Cacee B. SAYING |
See ONE Calle |

FrRcy ALM RFacH :

| SIGNED___

|: TELEPHONED poy PLease CALL |

ome To seevou | Jwncccarracan | ||
 Juamrerosetvoo | frase] I
7

[RETURNED Your caLL| — fsPEcIALATTENTION | | f

SA02837

[_SIGNED

GIUFFRE001461

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014231
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019513.txt,"Secret Agent | 25

quickly uncovering his true identity. He was listed by his true name
on the roster of the U.S. mission to the UN. By consulting personnel
records, one would further discover that he did not actually work for
the State Department. Because it was no secret that the U.S. mission
in Geneva housed the CIA station for all of Switzerland, any out-
sider would think it probable that this brittle gambler who played
the options market worked for the CIA.

Even though it cannot be precluded that Snowden was spotted
in Geneva by another intelligence service, there is no evidence, at
least that I know of, to suggest that he was approached by one. Nor
is there reason to believe that if he had been contacted by a for-
eign service in 2008, he would have responded positively. Despite
his indiscreet posting about his outside activities, he apparently still
respected the boundaries of secrecy that had been clearly defined in
the oath he had taken at the CIA. For example, after The New York
Times published an article revealing secret American intelligence
activities in Iran on January 11, 2009, Snowden railed against the
newspaper on the Internet under his TrueHooHa alias. He wrote,

© “This shit is classified for a reason.... It’s because this shit won't ®
work if Iran knows what we are doing.” He clearly recognized that
revealing intelligence sources was extremely damaging. As for the
Times, he said, “Hopefully they’Il finally go bankrupt this year.”
When another Internet user asked him if it was unethical to release
national security secrets, he answered, “ YEEEEEEEEEES.”

As with every CIA officer, Snowden had to undergo a two-year
evaluation and take a routine polygraph test. It was then, in Decem-
ber 2008, that his superior at the CIA placed a “derog” in his file, the
CIA’s shorthand for a derogatory comment, in an unfavorable evalu-
ation. The reason remains somewhat murky. According to a New
York Times story by the veteran intelligence reporter Eric Schmitt,
Snowden’s superior had suspected that Snowden “was trying to
break into classified computer files to which he was not authorized
to have access.” Schmitt evidently had well-placed sources in the
CIA. He said that he interviewed two senior American officials who
were familiar with the case. According to what they told Schmitt, the
CIA superior had decided to “send Snowden home.” Officially, how-

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 25 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019513
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012640.txt,"removed his towel, and laid down naked on the massage table. He demanded that Jane remove her
clothes. In shock, fear and trepidation, Jane complied, removing her clothes except for her
underwear. Epstein then sexually assaulted Jane,

15. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to get
dressed, leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met Ms. Robson again who brought
Janehome. Jane was paid $300 by Epstein. Ms. Robson was paid $200 by Epstein for bringing Jane
to him.

16. As a result of this encounter with Epstem, the 14-year old Jane experienced
confusion, shame, humiliation, embarrassment and the assault sent her life into a downward spiral.

COUNT I
Sexual Assault

17. Plaintiff Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, repeats
and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above.

18. Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually in or about 2005.

19. This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which
recognizes as a crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane.

20. Asa direct and proximate result of Epstein’s assault on Jane, she has suffered and will
continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and
emotional damages.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe, by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian,
demands judgment against Defendant J effrey Epstem for compensatory damages, punitive damages,

costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012640
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020392.txt,"240

CHAPTER SIX

Thief

1. “In Hawaii in 2012...”—Author’s interview with former Dell executive who
requested anonymity because of company policy about Dell employees discussing
the Snowden case.

2. “Living in paradise...” Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Ewen MacAskill,
“Edward Snowden: the whistleblower behind the NSA surveillance revelations,”
Guardian, June 9, 2013

3. “You’re in a vaulted space...”—Transcript of interview with Snowden in Moscow.
“I, Spy: Edward Snowden in Exile,” Ewen MacAskill and Alan Rusbridger, The
Guardian, July 18, 2014. http://www. theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/18/-sp-edward-
snowden-nsa-whistleblower-interview-transcript

4. “Law is a lot like medicine ...”-- David Weigel, “Edward Snowden and Ron
Paul Kick Off Libertarian Student Conference,” Bloomberg News, February 13,
2015. For Ron Paul position on “secret government, see
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/06/02/413952/US-Ron-Paul-CIA-NSA-secret-
government

5. “Fear and a false image...” —Bamford Wired, op. cit.

6. “Snowden was fully aware...”—James Risen email interview with Snowden in
Moscow. James Risen, “Snowden Says He Took No Secret Files to Russia,” New
York Times. October 17, 2013 (Hereinafter referred to as Risen interview)

7. “Called “Physical Phatness,” Lindsay Mills’ Facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/lindsay.mills.90/about

>

>

8.” It was the first known document...”—Ledgett revealed this in an in interview
with Vanity Fair. “The Snowden Saga,” Vanity Fair, op. cit

9.”” Whatever his motive, he...” Snowden’s obtaining the NSA examination is
described by Michael McConnell. See Rachael King, “Ex-NSA Chief Details
Snowden's Hiring at Agency, Booz Allen,” Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2014.
The extended video of interview is at:
www.wsj.com/articles/SB1000142405270230462680457936365 1571199832

10 “Tt was totally unrealistic. ..”-- Author’s interview with source B
11.”’Subsequently joking to a reporter,” Bamford Wired. op.cit

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020392
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026157.txt,"Appendix 1 -1Q17 P&L € mn

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026157

Ukrsibbank Ukrgasbank Raiffeisen Bank Aval
Q1 2017 | Q1 2016 | Q1 2017  Q1 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q1 2016 |
Interest income 29 38 51 43 57 55
Interest expense -6 -14 -36 -37 -10 -17
Net interest 23 24 15 5 46 39
income
| Net commission 12 10 4 2 17 13
income
Trading & other 3 7 4 -17 7 10
income
| Employee costs -10 9 -6 -4 -14 -12
Depreciation -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 3
24
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011697.txt,"Chapter Fourteen

It began with an accident. On Tuesday, December 8, 1987, an Israeli tank
transporter crashed into a minibus carrying Palestinians from the Jabalya
refugee camp near the main crossing from Gaza into Israel. Four passengers
were killed.

By the time of the funerals the next day, a rumor had spread, no less
incendiary for being absurd, that the crash had been deliberate — retaliation for
the fatal stabbing of an Israeli man a few days earlier. Crowds of Palestinians
leaving the burials began shouting “Death to Israel!” They hurled rocks and
bottles at Israeli security patrols, and blocked streets with burning tires. By the
next day, the violence started spreading to the West Bank, and then to parts of
east Jerusalem. The headline-writers moved from the word “disturbances” to
“unrest” and finally to the Palesitnians’ own name for the most serious outbreak
of violence since 1967: the “intifada”. The uprising.

At least for the first week or two, we assumed its ferocity and scale would
subside. Our immediate aim was to contain it, and limit the human cost on both
sides. Yet when Dan and I began visiting units on the front line of this new
conflict, we realized that if it kept escalating, we’d have to find new tools and
strategies to bring it under control. We were in charge of an army trained to
equip and fight enemy soldiers. Now, we were asking teenage recruits to
operate as riot police against stone-throwing mobs. Before long, it wasn’t just
stones, or even bottles. In one incident in Gaza, a young soldier was surrounded
by a crowd of Palestinians and stabbed. He opened fire, wounding two of the
attackers. Yitzhik Mordechai, now the head of the southern command, told
reporters that his troops were under “strict orders to open fire only if their lives
are under threat.” That was true. But I couldn’t help wondering how long the
other part of his statement would hold: that we remained “in control of the
situation.”

We did fee/ in control for the first few days. Defense Minister Rabin was
away in Washington on an official visit. When his office asked us whether he
should fly back, we said there was no need. But on his return, we quickly agreed
that, as a first priority, we needed to find an alternative to live ammunition in
quelling the attacks. Otherwise, we’d be left with two equally bad options:
either simply stand aside, in order to avoid killing or injuring demonstrators; or
intervene with the inevitable casualties. But one of our most important early
discussions was about the broader aspects of the violence. The meeting, held

226
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011697
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029906.txt,"for every teenaged girl she brought to Jeffrey, was cooperating with police, telling them
she was like ""Heidi Fleiss."" They obtained statements from five of Epstein's young victims,
who said they'd been paid $200 to $300 to engage in various sex acts with ...

Continue reading...

SUBSCRIPTION INFO

This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on
the HumanEvents.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you. We respect and value your time and privacy. If
this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.

Visit the Townhall Media Preference Center to manage your subscriptions..

Or Send postal mail to:
Ann Coulter Unsubscribe
P.O. Box 9660, Arlington, VA 22219

* Copyright Human Events and its Content Providers.
All rights reserved.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029906
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019275.txt,"Freedom House

Chapter 6

Flacks and Friends

Did the Russian government attempt to surrepti-
tiously influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election
in Donald Trump's favor? The answer to that question
may never be definitively known. There is, neverthe-
less, a critical mass of evidence that Kremlin-allied
forces were responsible for hacking into the Dem-
ocratic National Committee's computers, stealing
millions of files, and turning the information over to
WikiLeaks, which in turn circulated it to the media.
Some may find the evidence unsatisfactory. But given
Russia's well-established record of cyberwarfare,
previously directed at neighboring states like Estonia
and Ukraine, and the Russian regime's dislike for the
Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, there is ample
reason to treat charges of Russian culpability as
strongly credible.

Another body of evidence can be found in Russia's
record of involvement in the internal politics of a
number of countries in Europe, including European
Union (EU) member states. In fact, under Vladimir
Putin, Russia has repeatedly interfered in the affairs of
European states in ways that the Kremlin would regard
as intolerable if Russia were the target.

Russian involvement is usually camouflaged so as

to ensure a degree of deniability, but the disguise is
sometimes rather thin. In late 2014, France's far-right
National Front party, led by Marine Le Pen, secured a
€9 million loan from a Russian bank with indirect ties
to the government in what many interpreted as a bet
by Putin on the future of French politics. Le Pen has
subsequently spoken favorably of Putin and criticized
the sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU.' She has
even called for a strategic alliance with Russia and
proposed a pan-European grouping that would include
Russia while leaving out the United States. By 2016, the
National Front was seeking more funding that would
enable it to participate on an equal footing with main-
stream parties in the 2017 presidential contest.

The 2014 loan came just months after the National
Front helped provide a veneer of legitimacy to Russia's
illegal annexation of Crimea. Aymeric Chauprade, a Le
Pen adviser who once called Russia “the hope of the
world against new totalitarianism,” participated in an
observer mission to monitor the Crimean referendum
on secession from Ukraine and union with Russia. The

“As an operator, but not as a human
being, | would say Putin. The way he
played the whole Syria thing. Bril-
liant.”

—Nigel Farage, on the world leader he most admires

“| admire his cool head. Because
there is a cold war being waged
against him by the EU at the behest
of the United States... | admire that

he has managed to restore pride and
contentment to a great nation that
had been humiliated and persecuted
for 70 years.”

—Marine Le Pen

“[Putin] makes a decision and he exe-
cutes it, quickly. And then everybody
reacts. That's what you call a leader.”

—Rudy Giuliani

mission was arranged by a pro-Moscow organization
called the Eurasian Observatory for Elections and
Democracy, and consisted largely of politicians from

a variety of European far-right parties, including Hun-
gary’s Jobbik and Austria's Freedom Party. The vote,
held under Russian military occupation, was widely re-
garded as falling well short of international standards.
However, the Eurasian Observatory delegation gave
the referendum an enthusiastic thumbs-up.’

oscow has paid considerable attention to evolving
political developments in Central and Eastern Europe.
Despite their relatively recent histories of Soviet
subjugation and communist rule, a number of these
countries have seen the rise of populist or nationalist
parties that express admiration for or affinity with
Putin's regime. Meanwhile, mainstream parties have
developed attitudes toward Russia that are notable
for their ambivalence, including on the pivotal issue of
the Kremlin's invasion of Ukraine.

www.freedomhouse.org

A

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019275
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010589.txt,"61. In reasonable reliance on this and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for
deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit “BB.” Maxwell was represented
by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her
attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluctant to give her
deposition, and Edwards tried to work with her attorney to take her deposition on terms that
would be acceptable to both sides. The result was the attached confidentiality agreement, under
which Maxwell agreed to drop any objections to the deposition, attached hereto as Exhibit “CC.”
Maxwell, however, contrived to avoid the deposition. On June 29, 2010, one day before
Edwards was to fly to NY to take Maxwell’s deposition, her attorney informed Edwards that
Maxwell’s mother was deathly ill and Maxwell was consequently flying to England with no
intention of returning to the United States. Despite that assertion, Ghislaine Maxwell was in fact
in the country on July 31, 2010, as she attended the wedding of Chelsea Clinton (former
President Clinton’s daughter) and was captured in a photograph taken for OK magazine. Photos
from Issue 809 of the publication See US Weekly dated August 16, 2010 are attached hereto as
Exhibit “DD” and Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit “N” at 12.

62. Maxwell is not the only important witness to lie to avoid deposition by Edwards.
Upon review of the.message pads that were taken from Epstein’s home in the police trash pulls,
see Exhibit “J” supra, many were from Jean Luc Brunel, a French citizen and one of Epstein’s
closest pals. He left messages for Epstein. One dated 4/1/05 said, “He has a teacher for you to
teach you how to speak Russian. She is 2x8 years old, not blonde. Lessons are free and you can
have your 1* today if you call.” See Messages taken from Jean Luc Brunel are attached hereto as

Exhibit “EE.” In light of these circumstances of the case, this message reasonably suggested to
24

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010589
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013238.txt,"322 18 Advanced Self-Modification: A Possible Path to Superhuman AGI

schema are implicitly variables — they vary from one instance of schema execution to the next
— and may be treated as such for supercompilation purposes.

The metaprogram executes a program without assuming specific values for its input variables,
creating a tree as it goes along. Each time it reaches a statement that can have different results
depending on the values of one or more variables, it creates a new node in the tree. This part
of the supercompilation algorithm is called driving — a process which, on its own, would create
a very large tree, corresponding to a rapidly-executable but unacceptably humongous version
of the original program. In essence, driving transforms a program into a huge “decision tree”,
wherein each input to the program corresponds to a single path through the tree, from the root
to one of the leaves. As a program input travels through the tree, it is acted on by the atomic
program step living at each node. When one of the leaves is reached, the pertinent leaf node
computes the output value of the program.

The other part of supercompilation, configuration analysis, is focused on dynamically reduc-
ing the size of the tree created by driving, by recognizing patterns among the nodes of the tree
and taking steps like merging nodes together, or deleting redundant subtrees. Configuration
analysis transforms the decision tree created by driving into a decision graph, in which the
paths taken by different inputs may in some cases begin separately and then merge together.

Finally, the graph that the metaprogram creates is translated back into a program, embody-
ing the constraints implicit in the nodes of the graph. This program is not likely to look anything
like the original program that the metaprogram started with, but it is guaranteed to carry out
the same function [NOTE: Give a graphical representation of the decision graph corresponding
to the supercompiled binary search program for L=4, described above.].

18.3.2 Supercompilation for Goal-Directed Program Modification

Supercompilation, as conventionally envisioned, is about making programs run faster; and as
noted above, it will almost certainly be useful for this purpose within CogPrime.

But the process of program modeling embedded in the supercompilation process, is poten-
tially of great value beyond the quest for faster software. The decision graph representation of a
program, produced in the course of supercompilation, may be exported directly into CogPrime
as a set of logical relationships.

Essentially, each node of the supercompiler’s internal decision graph looks like:

Input: List L
Output: List
If ( P1(L) ) NI(L)

Else If ( P2(L) ) N2(L)

Else If ( Pk(L) ) Nk(L)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013238
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024740.txt,"A

>On
bt v~]

ELL
L

PITAL Cannabis Investment Report | December 2017

routine approval procedures for drugs with extracts of high-THC cannabis varieties; and (6) canna-
bis parts and derivatives will be removed from the CSA schedules (either incrementally, starting with
CBD, or all at once) and will be fully legal for medical and recreational purposes. (We expand on these
predicted developments in Chapter IV, U.S. Legal Landscape.) We believe that federal legalization will
trigger rapid growth in the U.S. market, propelled by interstate commerce, access to the federal bank-
ing system and acceleration of the cannabis-derived pharmaceuticals market. A change in the federal
status of cannabis in the United States will not only drive U.S. market growth, but should provide a
significant catalyst to the market worldwide.

Increasing Awareness of the Medical Efficacy of Cannabis. In aggregate, across all U.S. state laws,
cannabis is legally recognized as a form of therapy or medicine for more than 50 medical conditions.
In addition, at least 20 countries have medical laws that facilitate patient access to cannabis or concen-
trates for treating specified medical conditions. We believe that countries and U.S. states will continue
to adopt and enhance legal frameworks for the medicinal use of cannabis products. In addition, we
believe that many more cannabis consumers will emerge as research on cannabis increasingly demon-
strates its medical efficacy and as more therapeutic products are developed and brought to market.

Increasing Recreational Legalization. Most laws facilitating access to cannabis, both in U.S. states
and abroad, are medical laws. However, Uruguay and eight U.S. states have enacted recreational laws
permitting the commercial production and sale of cannabis to adults for recreational and other uses
(and Canada is widely expected to do so in mid-2018). In the handful of jurisdictions that started
with medical laws and later adopted recreational laws—particularly in Colorado, Washington and
Oregon—adoption of recreational laws has led to significant growth in overall market size and a rapid
increase in the percentage of the market represented by recreational consumers. We expect 2018 will be
a watershed year for the recreational market, with the implementation of California’s new recreational
law and the expected approval and implementation of Canada’s recreational law. If these laws stimulate
demand, as expected, and are otherwise viewed as successful, we expect more U.S. states and additional
countries to follow suit with similar laws.

Broadening Range of Cannabis Consumer Products. Product innovation and advancements in can-
nabis varieties, concentrates, infused products, vaporizing technology and cannabis-derived pharma-
ceutical products will drive consumer adoption and spending. Cannabis consumer product companies
will seek to differentiate their products through marketing, distribution, packaging, selection, quality
and pricing. We believe that product differentiation and availability will be more prevalent in legal
cannabis markets and will drive consumer transition from illegal to legal markets.

Declining Prices in U.S. State-Legal Cannabis Markets. The supply of cannabis has increased con-
siderably with expanded state legalization in the United States. This increase has started to dampen
retail and wholesale prices in various markets. As prices decline, we are starting to see closer price par-
ity between state-legal and illegal markets (in the United States, cannabis is generally priced lower in
illegal markets than in state-legal markets). Lower retail prices in state-legal markets should accelerate
consumer transition from illegal to state-legal markets and drive increased overall penetration rates.
However, state and local taxes will continue to impact pricing for cannabis products in state-legal can-
nabis markets.

104 © 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024740
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020894.txt,"Total Government* Healthcare Spending Increases are Staggering —

Up 7x as % of GDP Over Five Decades vs. Education Spending, Only Up 0.6x

USA Total Government Healthcare vs. Education Spending as % of GDP, 1960 — 2009

Spending as % of GDP

——Total Government (Federal + State + Local) Spending on Healthcare

\ ’ ——Total Government (Federal + State + Local) Spending on Education

0% oT

1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008

Note: *Total government spending on healthcare includes Medicare, Medicaid and other programs such as federal

employee and veteran health benefits; total government spending on education includes spending on pre-primary through

KP tertiary education programs. Source: Dept. of Education, Dept. of Health & Human Services.
www.kpcb.com

USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 105

Since Their Creation in 1965, Medicare + Medicaid Have Grown

to 35% of Total USA, Inc. Healthcare Spending in 2008 from 0%

USA Total Healthcare Spending by Funding Source, 1960 vs. 2009

1960 2009
Total Healthcare Total Healthcare
Spending = $187B* Spending = $2.5T*

Other Private Funds

Consumer
Out-of-pocket.

ther Government Payments.

Funds**

Other Private Funds

Consumer
Out-of-pocket
Payments

edicaid
(Federal
+ State +

Local)

Private Health

Insurance
Private Health

Insurance

Other Government
Funds**

Note: *Adjusted for inflation, in 2005 dollars. ** Other government funds include those from Dept. of Defense, Veterans’ Administration and federal funding
P for healthcare research and public health activities. Source: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
(@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 106

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020894
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021552.txt,"~*

(Rev. 05-01-2008)

 ) ee

UNCLASSIFIED

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 07/25/2008
To: [| Attn: ALAT

From: Miami
PB2/Palm Beach County Resident Agenc
Contact:

Approved By:
Drafted By:

Case ID #: 188B-MM-105207-D ™
31E-MM-108062, (Bending)

Title: Victim Assistance Program
Victim Notification Letter and Brochures
7/25/2008

Synopsis: To deliver Victim Notification Letter and brochures.

Enclosure(s): Victim Notification Letter
Brochure/Help for Victims of Crime
Brochure/The Victim Notification System

Details: Per our conversation, that was conducted on Monday,

July 21, 2008 please provide with the enclosed
Victim Notification Letter and brochures.

UNCLASSIFIED

SIE- MM pees Be 170
3olvso) 22 ‘STMT

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021552

b6é
b7C¢

"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027600.txt,"Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

2%

GUID: 1D47940F-6CCE-4C8C-A65E-S5FD9COBC4FA4

Message: Our girl is going to reach out to

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/16/19 09:13:17 AM (574445597)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 670C2226-4CA9-4310-B994-D38A231A35BB

Message: you

Time: 03/16/19 09:52:26 AM (574447946)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 6988EDEA-01DB-4689-B632-41283F0A2DF7

Message: ???

Time: 03/16/19 03:25:18 PM (574467918)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AF/79E1C1-896D-40E1-BCD5-615FA1DDA658

Message: Oh 'the next future ex-mrs. bannon'???

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/17/19 06:57:56 AM (574523876)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

r
Ne}

GUID: 9C822BAF-D873-428E-9E68-25FD2DD9CCFO

Message: Bolsonaro a good segue

sender:

Time: 03/17/19 07:59:13 AM (574527553)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027600
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998.txt,"Article 1.

Today’s Zaman

The UN's Mavi Marmara report and

Turkish foreign policy
Cenap Cakmak

07 September 2011 -- The long-awaited UN report on the Mavi
Marmara incident has been finally published. The report, the release
of which was postponed for a while at Israel's request, was published
by The New York Times before an official statement was made by the
relevant UN authorities. Israel is allegedly responsible for the leak of
the report.

Sources also say that shortly before the official deadline, US
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked Turkey to agree to the
postponement of the announcement of the report to late September.
But the report was leaked, likely because it became evident that the
report supports Israel's standpoint on the incident.

The report is significant for two reasons: First, the report now serves
as a legal justification for Israel's Gaza policy, including the naval
blockade as well as the raid Israeli forces carried out against the Mavi
Marmara in May 2010. Secondly, Turkey viewed the report as a
potential major asset, fortifying its case in the international arena as it
pursues a cooling foreign policy towards Israel in connection with the
Mavi Marmara incident. Apparently, however, it is no longer useful
for Turkey to prove it has been doing the right thing. After the
publication of the report, Turkey will have to expend greater effort to
justify its stance and make its position acceptable to the world.

What does the report say? Briefly, the report confirms and supports
everything Israel has already said about the Mavi Marmara incident.
To summarize its points:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024063.txt,"premiums for liability insurance to protect the Fund, the
General Partner, the partners of the General Partner, the
members of the GPLLC, the members of the Advisory Board,
and any of their respective partners, members, stockholders,
officers, directors, trustees, employees, agents or affiliates in
connection with the activities of the Fund and premiums to pay
“key-man” insurance; and all other expenses properly
chargeable to the activities of the Fund.

Distributions may be recalled for up to one year following the
date of liquidation of the Fund to satisfy (1) any obligations,
liabilities and other expenses that arise from the Fund’s
Portfolio Investments and (2) the Fund’s indemnification
obligations; provided that no Partner shall be required to return
an aggregate amount greater than the lesser of (A) the aggregate
amount of distributions made to such Partner (and such
Partner’s predecessors in interest) and (B) 25% of such Partner’s
Commitment

Key Person Event: The General Partner shall promptly notify the Advisory Board
in writing if, prior to the end of the Investment Period, fewer
than three Principals satisfy their obligation to devote
substantially all of their business time to the affairs of the
Management Company and its affiliates (including by reason of
death or disability) for a period exceeding 60 days. Following
any such occurrence, the Fund shall not make any new portfolio
investments other than permitted investments (a “Suspension
Period), unless such Suspension Period is lifted as provided in
the Partnership Agreement.

No Fault Termination of the Eighty-five percent in interest of the Limited Partners may cause

Investment Period: a termination of the Investment Period at any time after the
second anniversary of the Initial Closing Date, with such
termination to be effective as of the date they deliver written
notice of such termination to the General Partner, after which
the Fund shall not make any new portfolio investments other
than permitted investments as set forth in the Partnership
Agreement.

No Fault Termination of the Eighty per cent in interest of the Limited Partners (excluding

Fund: affiliates of the General Partner) may vote to dissolve the Fund
at any time after the second anniversary of the initial closing
date upon 120 days’ notice.

Removal of the General 66 2/3% in interest of the Limited Partners may remove the
Partner for Cause: General Partner upon the occurrence of certain cause events
specified in the Partnership Agreement.

52 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024063
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033177.txt,"WOULD YOU TRUST THIS MAN

_-

* = ii
™ sa:
po om a

ss,

WITH YOUR DAUGHTER?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033177
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015200.txt,"Indeed, condom consciousness (if not condom use) is present at the
convention. In one workshop, “The ABC’ s of Swinging,” condom
etiquette is described as bringing “the right safety equipment, just as you
would for scuba diving or parachuting.” Another presentation on “Safer

u

Sex” covers new drug therapies for AIDS, information on other sexually
transmitted diseases that are increasing among heterosexuals, and
“things you should be doing to protect yourself.”

Originally, herpes had caused a certain panic in swinger circles.
Some swing clubs closed, though private parties increased. But,
paradoxically enough, with the advent of AIDS, new clubs opened, as if the
disease were anti-climactic. Currently, there’ s a surge of growth in this
subculture—thanks to the Internet—with estimates ranging from 2,000 to
three million participants. And, according to Dr. McGinley, “There’ s been
very little increase in condom use. It’ s the woman’ s choice.”

Nonetheless, at the Adult Marketplace, a woman in a black lace
negligee roams around giving out free samples of condoms. There are also
Créme Cookie Condoms for sale. They appear to be vanilla and chocolate

Oreo-style cookies, individually wrapped in cellophane. | ask the vendor

whether these are condoms that look like cookies, or cookies that look like

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015200
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017611.txt,"Page 8 of 31
104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *69

[*70]
A. THE CVRA'S PURPOSES

An analysis of the CVRA's application before prosecutors have filed charges must begin by assessing the CVRA's purposes
because any interpretation of the CVRA that is divorced from the statute's purposes would run the risk of defeating the statute's
aims. It is axiomatic that courts should ""give faithful meaning to the language Congress adopted in the light of the evident
legislative purpose in enacting the law in question."" 4°

As discussed above, >°

one important goal of the CVRA was to keep crime victims informed about any developments in the
criminal justice process. But the need to be informed does not begin with the filing of a formal criminal charge. A crime victim
needs to know what is happening before formal charging - during a criminal investigation, for example - just as much as she
needs to know what is happening in court. Indeed, she may have a greater need to know, as she may be concerned that the

criminal who harmed her is still on the loose, posing a danger to her.

Similarly, concerning the second purpose - facilitating victim participation >!

- without a right to pre-charging involvement,
victims may be effectively shut out of the process entirely. The Epstein case provides a useful illustration of why the CVRA
must be understood to extend rights to victims prior to indictment. The prosecutors handling the investigation reached an
agreement with Epstein that barred federal prosecution of sex offenses committed against dozens of victims, including Jane
Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two. If CVRA rights did not extend to the negotiations surrounding the agreement,

then the victims never would have had any ability to participate in the resolution of the case. **

A construction of the CVRA that extends rights to victims before charges are filed would be entirely consistent with the
CVRA's participatory purpose. If victims have the ability to participate in a pre-charging plea bargaining process, for example,
victims can help ensure that prosecutors do not overlook anything that should be covered in the plea deal. For example, victims
might be able to obtain agreement to a ""no contact"" order or valuable restitution - points that the prosecutor might fail [*71] to
consider in crafting a plea. Similarly, allowing victims to participate early in the process avoids retraumatizing victims. Again,
as the Epstein case usefully illustrates, it may be extremely difficult for victims to discover after the fact that potential criminal
charges against a criminal who has abused them have been secretly bargained away. Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe
Number Two, for example, were outraged when they discovered prosecutors had entered into an agreement blocking any
prosecution of sex offenses Epstein committed against them - and all without telling them. >?

In short, the purposes animating the CVRA all suggest that the Act was meant to, and should, extend rights to crime victims
before formal charges are filed.

B. THE CVRA'S PLAIN LANGUAGE

While the general purposes of the CVRA support a broad interpretation of the Act, it is important to examine whether those
purposes have been expressed in the Act's language. Without a linkage to the Act's text, the general purpose might not provide

49 Graham Cnty. Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. United States ex rel. Wilson, 130 S. Ct. 1396, 1409 (2010) (quoting United States v.
Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303, 310 (1976)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

© See supra notes 24-27.
5! See supra notes 28-29.

*2 Even the Justice Department seems to recognize this point. As a matter of policy, the Department extends to victims the right to confer
with prosecutors in situations where plea discussions occur before charges have been brought. U.S. Dep't of Justice, Office for Victims of
Crime, Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance 41-42 (2011 ed., rev. May 2012) [hereinafter Attorney General
Guidelines].

3 Without disclosing confidential attorney-client communications, this fact is readily apparent from victims’ filings in the Epstein case. See,
e.g., Jane Doe Motion, supra note 40, at 17 (stating that the victims relied on the U.S. Attorney's Office representatives ""to their detriment[,]""
that if they knew the true facts, ""they would have taken steps to object"" to the plea agreement, and that they believed criminal prosecution to
be ""extremely important"").

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017611
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020880.txt,"Entitlement Spending: Non-Partisan CBO Advises Excluding Social Security /

Medicare Trust Funds’ Balances + Interest Income in Fiscal Analysis

Trust funds can be useful mechanisms for monitoring the balance between
earmarked receipts and a program's spending, but they are basically an
accounting device, and their balances, even if ""invested"" in Treasury securities,
provide no resources to the government for meeting future funding commitments.
When those payments come due, the government must finance them in the
same way that it finances other commitments -- through taxes or borrowing from
the public. Thus, assessing the state of the federal government's future finances
requires measuring such commitments independently of their trust fund status or
the balance recorded in the funds.

-- Congressional Budget Office (CBO)

“Measures of the U.S. Government’s Fiscal Position Under Current Law,” 8/04

KP
i USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 77

Entitlement Spending: Funding Patterns of Some

Entitlement Programs Work Better than Others

Have Worked Relatively Well Financially:
Social Security — Has operated at close to break-even - so far - thanks to sufficient payroll
tax income from a relatively large working-age population. In fact, Social Security has
worked so well, that its surplus net income has been used to finance other government
activities such as Medicaid.
Unemployment Insurance — Has operated at close to break-even thanks to accumulated
net incomes during ‘good years’ (though expenses spiked to $123 billion / $160 billion in
2009 / 2010 from $45 billion in 2008 owing to recession).

Have Worked Relatively Poorly Financially:
Medicaid — Has operated at an average annual loss of $160 billion with, in effect, an
average net margin of -100% over past 15 years; the annual dollar loss has risen from $108
billion to $273 billion because of rising healthcare costs and expanded enrollment.

Medicare — Has operated at an average annual loss of $123 billion with, in effect, an
average net margin of -83% over past 15 years; the margin has fallen from -66% to -154%
(or -$64 billion in annual loss to -$272 billion) because of rising healthcare costs +
expanding coverage (added Part D prescription drug benefits through legislation in 2003,
rolled out in 2006).

P Source: White House Office of Management and Budget.
a USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 78

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020880
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024754.txt,"Cannabis Investment Report | December 2017

through minority investment, by acquisition or otherwise. Examples of the emergence of such strategic
investors include Constellation Brands, Inc.’s (NYSE: STZ) approximately $190 million investment
in Canopy Growth Corporation (TSX: WEED) and the more than $400 million spent by The Scotts
Miracle-Gro Company (NYSE: SMG) to acquire soil, fertilizer, hydroponic equipment and lighting
companies that are supplying the cannabis industry. These types of transactions help support the valu-
ation levels in the industry and, to an extent, validate investors’ enthusiasm for the industry.

The stock price performance and valuations of cannabis-related companies continue to be robust,
irrespective of the aforementioned funding gap. In general, we believe that valuations in both the
public and private markets are being driven more by investors’ expectations for the future growth of
the cannabis industry than by individual company fundamentals. Similarly, especially in the over-the-
counter stock market in the United States—where most of the public cannabis-related companies are
traded—stock price fluctuations and valuations tend to be heavily influenced by the illiquidity in most
stocks and the trading strategies of those involved. Overall, we believe that the capital markets for the
cannabis industry will become more efficient and rational over time as we expect increased participa-
tion from institutional and strategic investors.

= Public Capital Markets

More than 300 cannabis-related companies are traded on one or more stock markets in the United
States, Canada and other international locations. Although these companies are publicly traded, most
are in early stages of development, have de minimis revenue and are not profitable. We use the term
“cannabis-related” to include companies that participate solely in the cannabis industry and those that
participate in the cannabis industry in addition to other industries or markets.

The ability of companies to access capital markets is dependent largely on the legal landscape
for cannabis in a particular country. For example, the capital markets in countries such as Canada,
Australia, Germany and Israel (countries that have a more permissive legal framework for cannabis)
have been receptive to cannabis-related companies, while the reception by capital markets in the United
States has been more varied.

In evaluating publicly traded companies, an investor should be cognizant of where the company is
traded, as there are significant differences across the various exchanges and markets with respect to list-
ing requirements, liquidity, independent research and types of investors. Many cannabis-related com-
panies are traded on more than one market in order to attract additional investors and facilitate trading
in multiple jurisdictions. However, we believe that it is instructive to evaluate a company based on the
primary market on which it trades (We determine a company’s primary market based on a number of
factors, including stock price history, trading volume and availability of estimates.)

In the United States, a limited number of cannabis-related companies are traded on the Nasdaq
Stock Market (Nasdaq), the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the NYSE American (NYSE
American), the NYSE’s market for small to mid-size capitalization companies. In addition, more than
200 cannabis-related companies are traded on the over-the-counter stock market (OTC). Nasdaq and

118 © 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024754
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021546.txt,"»
id
-
3

b3

) _ @ 7
FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) ° ere

31E-~MM-108062

Continuation of FD-302 of | | onL___] ; Page 2
[provided no ftirther information at
this time.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021546 >
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027614.txt,"Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: EA4FE113-5EE2-4A4E-ACAC-61DC096C129C

Message: She is going to Geneva

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/27/19 02:06:14 AM (575370374)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 55F32E72-727A-47C1-AC5A-8 6A1C6BB2706

Message: Im staying Paris where she will come

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/27/19 02:11:06 AM (575370666)
Flags: 1150981

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 4A7CFD9B-4023-4751-A83A-CEFD4C054514

Message: Dud Po I don't like texting

Time: 03/27/19 02:15:31 AM (575370931)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No

GUID: C4DFF/7A9-DOBE-4174-B648-E905024841

El
us
~l

Message: Got it

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/27/19 02:17:07 AM (575371027)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: BD1AA440-CBF5-4BB1-98BB-2F62FA68D81C

Message: Or my cell

sender:

Time: 03/27/19 03:51:08 AM (575376668)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027614
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024077.txt,"confiscatory taxation; and (v) the possible imposition of non-U.S. taxes on income and gains
recognized with respect to such securities. While the General Partner will take these factors into
consideration in making investment decisions for the Fund and intends to manage the Fund ina
manner to minimize exposure to the foregoing risks, there can be no assurance that the General
Partner will be able to evaluate the risks accurately or that adverse developments with respect
to such risks will not adversely affect the value or realization of investments that are held by the
Fund in certain countries.

Reserves

As is customary in the industry, the General Partner may establish reserves for follow-on
investments by the Fund in portfolio companies, operating expenses (including the
Management Fee), Fund liabilities, and other matters. Estimating the appropriate amount of
such reserves is difficult, especially for follow-on investment opportunities, which are directly
tied to the success and capital needs of portfolio companies. Inadequate or excessive reserves
could impair the investment returns to the Limited Partners. If reserves are inadequate, the
Fund may be unable to take advantage of attractive follow-on or other investment opportunities
or to protect its existing investments from dilutive or other punitive terms associated with “pay-
to-play” or similar provisions. If reserves are excessive, the Fund may decline attractive
investment opportunities or hold unnecessary amounts of capital in money market or similar
low-yield accounts.

Diverse Investors

The Limited Partners may have conflicting investment, tax, and other interests with respect to
their investments in the Fund. The conflicting interests of individual Limited Partners may
relate to or arise from, among other things, the nature of investments made by the Fund, the
structuring or the acquisition of investments and the timing of disposition of investments. As a
consequence, conflicts of interest may arise in connection with decisions made by the Fund
Managers, including with respect to the nature or structuring of investments that may be more
beneficial for some Limited Partners than for others, particularly with respect to investors’
individual tax situations. In selecting and structuring investments appropriate for the Fund, the
General Partner will consider the investment and tax objective of the Fund and the Partners as a
whole, not the investment, tax or other objective of any Limited Partner individually.

Failure of Limited Partners to Fulfill Their Commitment Obligations

The Fund’s investments in portfolio companies will require capital calls on Limited Partners
over an extended period of time. Failure by a Limited Partner to meet a capital call could result
in the failure of the Fund to make desired investments, which could have adverse consequences
for the Fund and thus all of the Limited Partners. The failure by the Fund to receive a
significant portion of capital contributions due from Limited Partners in respect of their
Commitments could materially impair the Fund’s ability to realize its financial objectives. In
the event that a Limited Partner defaults, such Limited Partner may be subject to various
penalties, including forfeiture of all or a portion of its interest in the Fund, as provided in the
Partnership Agreement.

Risk of Dilution
Limited Partners subscribing for interests at subsequent closings will participate in existing

investments of the Fund, diluting the interest of existing Limited Partners therein. Although
such Limited Partners will contribute their pro rata share of prior capital contributions

66 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024077
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020658.txt,"199

International Associates

Anne-Marie Brady is Professor at the University of Canterbury and a Global Fellow at the
Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington.

Timothy Cheek is Director of the Institute of Asian Research, Louis Cha Chair in Chinese
Research, and Professor of History at the University of British Columbia.

John Fitzgerald is an Emeritus Professor in the Center for Social Impact at Swinburne
University of Technology.

John Garnaut is a political risk consultant to the Australian government and private sector
and was Senior Advisor to former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Timothy Garton Ash is a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and Professor of European
Studies at the University of Oxford.

Francois Godement is the director of the European Council on Foreign Relations’ Asia and
China Program.

Bilahari Kausikan is a former Permanent Secretary of the Singapore Ministry of Foreign
Affairs.

Richard McGregor is a Senior Fellow at the Lowy Institute and journalist.

Eva Pils is a Professor of Law and Director of Doctoral Studies at the Dickson Poon School
of Law, King’s College London.

Volker Stanzel is Vice President of the German Council on Foreign Relations and former
German Ambassador to China and Japan.

About the Participants

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020658
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015214.txt,"At one point, an announcement is made that the next dance
number will be filmed, so anybody who doesn’ t wish to be recognized
should get off the dance floor. About 80% of the dancers leave. Similarly,
taking part in the costume-judging means that permission to be
photographed is automatically granted, which results in many contestants
not making themselves available to be chosen as possible finalists.

The Best Male Costume goes to a 75-year-old man dressed as a
biker stud. The Best Female Costume goes to his 75-year-old wife, dressed
as a biker slut. The Best Couple’ s Costume goes to a woman with paper
mache’ breasts the size of beach balls and her mate with matching
enormous testicles but covered by pillowcases and a sign that warns,

“Censored by the hotel and ABC.""

A marriage ceremony is performed onstage. The blissful pair have
written their own vows; nothing is mentioned about forsaking all others.
The newlyweds, their party and a few other couples are invited to a
gathering in the suite of a three-time Emmy Award-winning TV producer
and his wife. It turns out to be a tantra-filled wedding night. All the women
massage the groom, and all the men massage the bride. One woman, a

computer animator who wants to become a sexual surrogate, predicts

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015214
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033163.txt,"From: Eric Roth as

Sent: 3/24/2015 5:58:34 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: 10:00pm Tonight - CNBC Feature

Attachments: image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg
Importance: — High

Hi Jeffrey,
Hope all is well.

Should you be bored this evening, we will be featured on CNBC’s “Secret Lives of The Super Rich” showcasing our S-76
refurbishment for Donald Trump.

Warm regards,

Eric

ERIC H. ROTH | PRESIDENT
+ \ international jet

www.intljet.com E ~

2221 Smithtown Avenue, Long Island MacArthur Airport, Ronkonkoma, New York 11779

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033163
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605.txt,"Page 2 of 31
104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *59

[61]

Introduction

In recent years, federal and state enactments have given crime victims extensive rights to participate in criminal cases. Many of
these rights apply only after the filing of criminal charges, such as the victim's right to be heard during court proceedings. A
crime victim's right to deliver an impact statement at sentencing, for instance, can only be exercised after a prosecutor has filed
charges against a defendant and obtained a conviction. Other rights, however, can apply even before the formal filing of
charges. As one example, the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) ! extends to federal crime victims the right to ""confer"" with
prosecutors. But can victims exercise this right before charges have been filed?

This question has tremendous practical importance. In many cases, prosecutors negotiate pleas well before any charges are ever
drafted. If crime victims’ rights enactments do not extend rights to victims until the formal filing of charges, then crime victims
can be effectively excluded from the plea bargaining process. Yet the exclusion of victims in early stages of a criminal case
affects more than just the content of a plea deal. Crime victims will also lose other important rights in the process if the formal
filing of charges is the necessary trigger for those rights. If, for example, prosecutors work out a nonprosecution agreement
with an offender, they need not notify his victims of what they are doing or of the fact that potential charges will never be filed.

The issue of pre-charging rights has most prominently surfaced in connection with federal cases. In 2010, the Department of
Justice's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) weighed in on the issue and released a legal opinion arguing that victims of federal
crimes have no CVRA rights during a federal criminal investigation. ? The Justice Department took the position that rights
under the CVRA do not apply until prosecutors formally initiate criminal proceedings by filing a complaint, information, or
indictment. The Department claims to find support for that limiting interpretation of the statute in its plain language and
legislative history.

Shortly after the Department released its opinion, one of the CVRA's congressional sponsors, then-Senator Jon Kyl, sent a letter
to Attorney General Eric Holder strenuously objecting to the Department's conclusions. Senator Kyl directly stated his view
that ""when Congress enacted the [*62] CVRA, it intended to protect crime victims throughout the criminal justice process -
from the investigative phases to the final conclusion of a case."" ? Senator Kyl contested the Department's analysis of the statute
and, in particular, its use of statements from him during Congress's consideration of the CVRA.

This Article sides with the CVRA's cosponsor and concludes that crime victims’ CVRA rights attach before formal charging.
Both the CVRA's plain language and its legislative history lead inexorably to this conclusion, as every court that has considered
this issue has concluded. This Article also contends that, as a matter of sound public policy, crime victims should have rights
before the formal filing of criminal charges.

This Article proceeds in four parts. Part I frames the issues under discussion by defending the importance of extending rights to
crime victims during criminal investigations. Part I also provides background on victims' rights and gives a concrete illustration
of a case in which the question of pre-charging rights for crime victims has arisen - specifically, the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse
case before a federal court in Florida. In that case, girls victimized by Epstein have argued that they should have been consulted
about a federal nonprosecution agreement; Department attorneys have responded that because prosecutors never filed charges,
government officials had no formal obligations to inform the girls.

' Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn Crime Victims' Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 178
Stat. 2260, 2261-65 (2004) (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. § 377] (2012) and 42 U.S.C. § 10603(d)-(e) (2006)).

2 The Availability of Crime Victims’ Rights Under the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004, 35 Op. O.L.C. J (Dec. 17, 2010) [hereinafter OLC
CVRA Rights Memo], available at http://goo.gl/fHmCL4.

3 Letter from Jon Kyl, U.S. Sen., to Eric H. Holder, Jr., Att'y Gen. (June 6, 2011), reprinted in 157 Cong. Rec. $3608 (daily ed. June 8, 2011)
(statement of Sen. Jon Kyl).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023718.txt,"sell-off, Asia FX may have more weakness to come than MXN. Will copper/infrastructure rally eventually
help Chile?

Most macro love NKY, willing to love it more. Bringing it home; fast macro money players are rushing to
erase losses, year long pains through wider rates, longer USD, weaker EM, stronger equities.

Real Money is in defensive, remembering Taper Tantrum days, fearing institutional outflows & forced selling
of carry hope positions.

Those who want to ""fade"" Trump rally, seek valuation in EM, believe core rates can tighten to get a breather
are in Minority.

This material was prepared by a Sales or Trading function within Deutsche Bank AG or one of its affiliates
(collectively “Deutsche Bank”), and was not produced, reviewed or edited by the Research Department. Any
opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other Deutsche Bank departments
including the Research Department. This material is intended for your personal use and Deutsche Bank is not
soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or transaction, or participation in any particular trading strategy.
This material, and the information contained therein, does not constitute the provision of investment advice.
Sales and Trading functions are subject to additional potential conflicts of interest which the Research
Department does not face. Deutsche Bank may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views
discussed herein. Deutsche Bank trades or may trade as principal in the instruments (or related derivatives),
and may have proprietary positions in the instruments (or related derivatives) discussed herein. Deutsche Bank
may make a market in the instruments (or related derivatives) discussed herein. Sales and Trading personnel
are compensated in part based on the volume of transactions effected by them. Assumptions, estimates and
opinions expressed constitute the author’s judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change
without notice. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. This material is based upon
information that Deutsche Bank considers reliable as of the date hereof, but Deutsche Bank does not represent
that it is accurate and complete. Certain transactions or securities mentioned herein, including derivative
products, give rise to substantial risk, including currency and volatility risk, and are not suitable for all
investors. Deutsche Bank transacts business with counterparties on an arm’s length basis and on the
assumption that each counterparty is sophisticated and capable of independently evaluating the merits and risks
of each transaction and that the counterparty is making an independent decision regarding any transaction.

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or
have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

Please refer to https://www.db.com/disclosures for additional corporate and regulatory EU disclosures and to
http://www.db.com/unitedkingdom/content/privacy.htm for information about privacy.

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023718
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026143.txt,"Ukrsib bank

I have considered a number of banks (Appendix I) and given my experience in the
country, Ukrsib is my top choice for the following reasons:

«= Image of a European reliable, ethical, healthy bank with good electronic
banking solutions (Top 5 in 2017) servicing first class corporate customers and
their employees. The shareholders comprise BNP Paribas (60%) and EBRD
(40%).

= Good coverage ratio of problematic loans, a practice of French banks we have
observed in many occasions with recent experience in Greece with Credit
Agricole and Soc Gen.

The NPL ratio is 31% (EUR 301 million), less than the 36.4% average for
banks with foreign capital, and coverage of around 80%. From the 2016 audited
annual accounts, the remaining 20% net of reserves NPL portfolio is covered 4
times by collateral. The most problematic loans population has been that of
mortgages in foreign currency and it seems that Ukrsib has provisioned this part
adequately.

Mortgage Other Consumer Overdraf Other Total
s mortgages loans ts loans
Neither past due nor
impaired
High grade 0.2 5 0.1 508 513.
3
Medium grade 0
Low grade 4 4
Without ranking (up to 1 1 3 21 7 13.3 45.3
year)
Without ranking (1-10 20 3 20 0.1 3 46.1
years)
Without ranking (more 45 5 50
than 10 years)
Total neither past due 66.2 15 41 7.2 529.3 658.
nor impaired 7
Past due but not
impaired
10

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026143
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011683.txt,"been different in each of them. In the Yom Kippur War, the problem was not
just Eli Zeira’s failure to activate the sayeret’s listening devices in Eygpt,
deeply damaging though that was. It was judgement. Inside Aman, a kind of
groupthink had taken hold. It was rooted in a confident, costly misconception
which went unchallenged: that Egypt would never risk another war without an
air force capable of breaching our defences and striking towns and cities deep
inside Israel. No one pressed the alternative scenario: that Sadat might strike
with more limited territorial objectives and, under cover of his SAM batteries
on the other side of the Suez Canal, advance into the Sinai.

In the Lebanon war, the inquiry suggested, Yehoshua Saguy did try to warn
the generals, and the government, about major risks. But individual ministers
testified that they hadn’t heard, hadn’t been there, or hadn’t understood, leading
the inquiry to stress the responsibility of a Rosh Aman to ensure not just that his
message was conveyed, but that it was received as well.

I set out to address both problems. Inside the department, I insisted on
making all our preconceptions open to challenge. I set up a unit whose sole
function was to play devil’s advocate when a consensus was reached. It began
with the opposite conclusion and, through a competing analysis of the data, and
logical argument, tried to prove it. I also wanted to be challenged on my
preconceptions. I assigned a bright young major as my personal intelligence-
and-analysis aide. He read everything that crossed my desk and could access
any material in the department. “You have no responsibility to agree with any of
the analysts, or with me,” I said. “Part of your job is to disagree.”

In the Lebanon war, Saguy had faced an additional problem. He was
excluded from some government meetings at which crucial decisions were
made. That was out of his control. I didn’t want it to be out mine. I raised the
issue with Begin in our first meeting. “If you want to get the maximum value
from your head of intelligence,” I said, “you should make sure he’s there not
just after, but when decisions are made.” Yet he was now only months from
leaving office, exhausted by the war and its aftermath. He waved his hand
weakly in response, as if to say none of it mattered. His successor, in October
1983, was Foreign Minister Yitzhak Shamir. Ideologically, he was cut from the
same cloth: an advocate from the 1940s of securing a Jewish state in all of
Palestine, by whatever force necessary. He’d broken with Begin’s pre-state
Irgun militia to set up a group called Lehi, which went further and carried out
political assassinations: the 1944 killing of Lord Moyne, Britain’s Minister for

212
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011683
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029912.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 8/8/2016 9:30:03 PM
Subject: Re: Re:

im in santa fe for the next two weeks come visit

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Pritzker, Tom {> wrote:

You have to be a bit of a wonk to know some of the names, but Nye, Scowcroft and Nick Burns run it (Scowcroft being
replaced by Condi). Members include Patraeus, Albright, Slaughter, Donalon (Obama NSA), Hadley (Bush NSA), Sullivan
(NSA Hillary), Bill Burns (State #2), Kurt Campbell, Hoss Carwright (#2 Jt Chiefs), Harman, Ignatius, Sanger, Nunn, Reed,
Sawers (MI6), Sherman (iran deal), Work (current #2 DoD). It seems to now be taking on an aura.

Looking for a time to come catch up in NY.

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 2:45 PM

Subject: Re:

who attends

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Pritzker, Tom {i wrote:

I'm working on a date. Just finished presentation on leadership to grand pooh baahs of Aspen Strategy
Group. Take a look at members it will make you laugh. Certainly made me laugh when they asked me to do
it.

On Aug 8, 2016, at 9:55 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

glenn?

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029912
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019261.txt,"Freedom House

Sharing worst practices

During the 1990s there was much discussion in the
major democracies regarding the export of “best prac-
tices,” meaning the institutions, policies, and ways

f doing things that had strengthened democratic
governance in some of the more successful post-au-
thoritarian societies, especially in Central Europe.

ore recently, modern authoritarian regimes have
turned this concept on its head by sharing their own
experiences with laws and tactics that have the effect
f retarding democratic development.

e}

o}

Laws restricting the autonomy and funding of NGOs
have been widely copied around the world. Many of
the affected countries tolerated civil society activism
in the period after the Cold War, only to move ina
more repressive direction after the most prominent
color revolutions alerted incumbent leaders to poten-
tial threat posed by civic activism. Once Russia had
demonstrated a willingness to adopt legislation and
then enforce it, other countries followed suit, first in
Eurasia but subsequently in Africa, Asia, the Middle
East, and Latin America.

Governments that adopt such laws seldom if ever
shut down the civil society sector entirely. Instead,
they deal with NGOs selectively, tolerating those that
present no threat to the status quo, monitoring oth-
ers, and repressing those that the leadership regards
as a potential focus of opposition activity. Even some
democracies, such as India, Indonesia, and Kenya,
have enacted laws to strengthen state control over
NGOs. But the most serious restrictions have been
imposed by authoritarian regimes.

According to a 2013 report, 12 countries had prohib-
ited foreign funding for NGOs outright while another
49 placed restrictions on foreign donations."" For
authoritarian leaders, the imposition of foreign fund-
ing restrictions is a convenient tactic in that it makes
it difficult for the organization to function effectively
but falls short of an outright ban, which could attract
sharper criticism. Furthermore, governments can jus-
tify their action on grounds of protecting sovereignty
against foreign interference—a potent argument in
an era when nationalist ideas have garnered greater
public support. Thus in rejecting an appeal to govern-
ment policies that restrict NGO work, the Venezuelan
Supreme Court spoke of foreign assistance as “a
typical manifestation of the interventionist policies of
a foreign power to influence the internal affairs of the
Venezuelan state.""!”

China piles on

In early 2016, joining its authoritarian colleagues,
China acopted its first formal law meant to regulate
the country’s rapidly expanding NGO sector. Previous-
ly, foreign NGOs registered as commercial enterprises
and conducted their advocacy work “off the books.”
Under the new law, foreign NGOs are subject to a se-
ries of additional bureaucratic hurdles, some of which
could seriously impinge on their work.

For example, foreign NGOs are now required to join in
partnership with a Chinese organization. In practice,
this could make it difficult for NGOs that work on sen-
sitive issues like the rule of law to function, as Chinese
organizations would be hesitant to join a foreign entity
in pursuing such a politically explosive mission.

Moreover, foreign NGOs will be compelled to register
with the police rather than the Ministry of Civil Affairs,
as had been the case.'® The law gives the police
sweeping powers to detain staff, restrict activities or
events, or regulate an NGO's ability to open an office.'®
An NGOs registration can be revoked under a vague
clause that forbids spreading rumors, engaging in
defamation, or publishing “other harmful information
that endangers state security or damages the national
interest.""”°

The new law was passed in the context of intensified
repression, an economic slowdown, and a drive by
the Xi Jinping leadership to suppress discussion of
“Western ideas” in the media and at universities. Even
as the country’s leadership boasted of China's role as
a world power, the country’s education minister, Yuan
Guiren, felt compelled in 2015 to warn against the use
of “textbooks promoting Western values” in Chinese
classrooms.

Indeed, the authorities had carried out a series of
arrests, focusing on precisely the sort of indepen-
dent-minded activists with whom reform-oriented
international NGOs would expect to collaborate: hu-
man rights lawyers, advocates for minority rights and
religious freedom, and women's rights campaigners.”
Around the time of the law's adoption, the govern-
ment took the unusual step of showcasing a televised
confession by a Swedish citizen who had worked with
legal reform groups in China. Xinhua claimed that

the activist, Peter Dahlin, had served a human rights
organization that “hired and trained others to gather,
fabricate, and distort information about China.""22

The adoption of formal restrictions on NGOs is one

www.freedomhouse.org

27

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019261
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031662.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2/17/2017 11:31:08 AM 
To: Larry Summers 
Subject: Re: 
And you an interllectual with a Wall Street curiosity 
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:55 AM Larry Summers < > wrote: 
U r wall st tough guy w intellectual curiosity. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Feb 16, 2017, at 10:34 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
i find it amazing -but both. . where do you think I fit in your descriptions.? wall st tough. ? or dem 
fighter for principles 
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Larry Summers <_________________________ wrote: 
It was unhinged. 
Your Repub friends are goofy. 
Are any of them w experience in DC or are they wall st tough guy types. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Feb 16, 2017, at 3:31 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
my assessment this morning seemed pretty accurate as to his views. / my republican friends thougt the 
press conference was GREAT , and the dems thought he was "" unhinged. "" 
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Larry Summers <____________________________> wrote: 
Got it. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031662 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Feb 9, 2017, at 2:15 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I m on palm beach, available after 3. 
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Larry Summers <=11111). wrote: 
When r u home. 
Ruemmler predictable. 
U not. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Feb 9, 2017, at 2:07 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
you can call ruemm ler. the wind of dissent has turned into a cat 5 hurricane. Already today I have 
gotten 6 high volume irate calls. all similar to can you believe !!! Since this is not really my arena Ill 
have to concede, if only for self preservation. :) 
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Larry Summers < > wrote: 
It's ok. 
He didn't wreck world and avoided scandal. 
What does Ruemmler say re his attitude towards women? 
Sent from my iPad 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office a 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Feb 7, 2017, at 1:30 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
your man of the people 
http ://www.usato day. com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/07/president-b arack-ob ama-kiteb o ards-horses-
around-richard-branson-ep ic-vac ation/97592260/  
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Larry Summers < wrote: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031663 
Yes. In NYC actually. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:14 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
speak today 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031664 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031665 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031666 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014225.txt,"| JU VWoSo

@O TL sent uetangy Rushkia's
ynas} te ~their correct aoldress
and called Post oCSice +o make
Suve alt Quckure marl coil DE Serr to ae,

BT Schecter the cable comer.

to come Orn “Thursday. “Thes is deir
Seonest a.ppeintment. Ghislaine aSKed
me. -to make Zapppiniment Because
he “TV In whe’ Blve Roo does not
ges a Clear recephon.

Sto tee Company writ Come

SARcy THURSDAY TO MEMsVKE |
SHurrere, NExT TO GHISLAswE 'S |
DESK... THE SHvTER wile vor | |
tole Down | f

|

qe. COMPANY

zc comeany + SHV
% Bare arene oes My Cée PitowE Oo
MaALG SO

ee. rserrreq + Gliisttiwe ARE MOT
Jeffrey E. Epstein , Vi""

SA02969

GIUFFRE001523

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014225
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019507.txt,"Tinker | 19

own beefcake-style pictures, “So sexxxy it hurts” and “I like my girl-
ish figure that attracts girls.” He approached a model agency called
Model Mayhem, which recommended a photographer. He had some
concern about that photographer because he, as Snowden wrote in
a post, “shoots mostly guys.” Snowden said he was “a little worried
he might, you know, try to pull my pants off and choke me to death
with them, but he turned out to be legit and is a pretty damn good
model photographer.” He posted the photographs on the Internet.
The lack of any paid job offers dashed Snowden’s hopes for a model-
ing career.

Around this time, he began dating Lindsay Mills, an extremely
attractive nineteen-year-old art student at the Maryland Institute
College of Art. Jonathan Mills, Lindsay’s father, was an applications
developer at the Oracle Corporation. According to him, Snowden
met his daughter on an Internet dating site. Snowden and Mills had
much in common. They both had divorced parents who gave them a
great deal of latitude in conducting their personal lives. Both of them
were keenly interested in perfecting their bodies through exercise

© and diet regimes. Mills’s only paid employment over the next eight ©
years would be as a fitness and yoga instructor in Maryland. When
they first met, they both had ambitions to be models, and neither of
them had inhibitions about posing provocatively for photographers.
They both also had a desire to travel to exotic places, including cities
in Asia. Mills had spent four month in Guilin, China, before meeting
Snowden.

As bleak as his prospects as a high-school dropout might have
seemed, Snowden had an unexpected stroke of good fortune in the
spring of 2006. The CIA offered him a $66,o00-a-year job as a CIA
communications officer. “I don’t have a degree of ANY type. In fact,
I don’t even have a high school diploma,” Snowden boasted in May
2006 on the website Ars Technica under his alias. He added, with
only a slight exaggeration, “I make 70K.”

How did Snowden get the job? The CIA’s minimum requirements
in 2006 for a job in its clandestine division included a bachelor’s or
master’s degree and a strong academic record, with a preferred GPA
of 3.0 or better.

The CIA needed technical workers in 2006. But even if Snowden

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 19 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019507
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012654.txt,"Jay Lefkowitz/New To Ami Sheth/New York/Kirkland-Ellis@K&E

York/Kirktand-Eli
Sent by: Kasin AndarsarvNee cc Eugene Kornel/New York/Kirkland-Ellis@K&E

York/Kirkland-Ellis bcc

12/12/2007 04:20 PM Subject Fw: Epstein

~— Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York/Kirkland-Ellis on 12/12/2007 04:19 PM —--

“Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)""
ns To “Jay Lefkowitz"" isn
11/27/2007 01:55 PM co ""Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)"" i

Subject Epstein

Jay,

Please accept my apologies for not getting back to you sooner but I was a little under the weather
yesterday. I hope that you enjoyed your Thanksgiving.

Regarding the issue of due diligence concerning Judge Davis’ selection, I’d like to make a few
observations. First, Guy Lewis has known for some time that Judge Davis was making
reasonable efforts to secure Aaron Podhurst and Bob Josephsberg for this assignment. In fact,
when I told you of Judge Davis’s selection during our meeting last Wednesday, November 21°,
you and Professor Dershowitz seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surprised, with the
selection. Podhurst and Josephsberg are no strangers to nearly the entire Epstein defense team
including Guy Lewis, Lili Ann Sanchez, Roy Black, and, apparently, Professor Dershowitz who
said he knew Mr. Josephsberg from law school. Second, Podhurst and Josephsberg have
long-standing stellar reputations for their legal acumen and ethics. It’s hard for me to imagine
how much more vetting needs to be done.

The United States has a statutory obligation (Justice for All Act of 2004) to notify the victims of
the anticipated upcoming events and their tights associated with the agreement entered into by
the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion. Tomorrow will make one full week since
you were formally notified of the selection. I must insist that the vetting process come to an end,
Therefore, unless you provide me with a good faith objection to Judge Davis’s selection by COB
tomorrow, November 28, 2007, I will authorize the notification of the victims. Should you give
me the go-ahead on Podhurst and Josephsberg selection by COB tomorrow, I will simultaneously
send you a draft of the letter. I intend to notify the victims by letter after COB Thursday,

November 29"". Thanks,

Jeff

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012654
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018619.txt,"I wrote this in late 2011, while I was finishing up the first draft of my awesome book
Confessions of a Pickup Artist Chaser. / was still processing a lot of stuff I'd learned
about pickup artist tactics and pickup artist attitudes, and that's reflected in this piece.
But there's a lot more to it, from working out some stuff about polyamory to my feelings
about marriage. A lot of these thoughts are developed further in Confessions.

KK ok

Chemistry
It's a long story and a short one, but I guess all of them are.

I'm 27. It's about that age: A lot of my compatriots are getting married lately -- most
monogamously, some to a primary polyamorous partner. I myself have a stack of
relationships in my past. Some were monogamous, some polyamorous. Some have been
on-and-off, some short-term, some long-term (5 or 6 years was the longest). Lately I've
been processing some tough questions about polyamory, but I'd like to stick with it.

And I've been thinking a lot about what I want in a primary polyamorous partner. The
kind of guy I could marry. I wonder if I'll ever get to that point. I wonder if I'd know him
if I saw him.

te OK ok

I met Mr. Ambition at one of the aforementioned weddings. Several people
recommended that I talk to him, and we liked each other right away. Mutual friends used
words like ""zealot"" to describe him; let's just say he's got an intense history of dedicated
activism. Charisma, integrity, and pure energy pour off him. His words are almost always
articulate and challenging. He can socially dominate a room without thinking. He works a
challenging job ten hours per day; exercises two hours; socializes several hours; sleeps
and eats when he can. He gives hugs easily, laughs easily, hands out compliments like
candy.

Mr. Ambition is most definitely not a neutral personality. Of course, neither am I.

At the time, I was just coming out of the worst stage of my research on pickup artists -- a
subculture of men who trade tips on how to seduce women. Also, I'd just had one of those
breakups where I was too busy feeling stupid to properly understand how hurt I was.
(Don't you hate those?) You can read all about those Dramatic Events in my upcoming
book Confessions of a Pickup Artist Chaser. In the meantime, suffice to say that I felt...
flattened.

Arguably, I should have had a sign taped to my forehead that read: ""Emotionally
Unavailable.""

I went to dinner with Mr. Ambition later that week. At the end of the meal, he sat back
and looked at me. ""You're so authentic,"" he said.

""I haven't felt very authentic lately,"" I said frankly, but his words felt good. Like a balm.
Like I was healing.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018619
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020386.txt,"234

http://www.thejournal.ie/edward-snowden-says-the-us-can-look-at-nude-
photos-20323 14-Apr2015

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020386
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018250.txt,"Chapter Two: The Age of Network Power

In which the Seventh Sense reveals a fundamental insight: Connection changes the
nature of an object.

1.

Several hundred years ago the forces of the Enlightenment and the Industrial
Revolution, like twin hammers, began working away at the roots of an ancient order.
The powerful ideas of liberty, freedom of thought, science, democracy and
capitalism - these all layered one upon the other. They washed, like irresistible
tides, across the institutions and kingdoms and beliefs of Europe and in a process of
revolution, of invention, of destruction and creation, they put a period at the end of
one era, and began the very first lines of anew human story. These forces produced
what we know today as the modern world: Trains knit new markets, science tripled
life spans, democracy liberated politics. Confronted with this really irresistible
pressure, a gulf opened. The world started to cleave. On one side were the nations
and peoples that our modern economists would come to know and label as a
“Convergence Club.” ? This group mastered and refined and then used the tools of
their era to become industrial, democratic, scientific and rich.1° They left the age of
kings and feudal lords, of alchemists and all-knowing priests behind. At the same
time, a “Divergence Club” appeared. These nations missed the essential turn. They
were trapped. Old ideas, useless habits of power, inescapable history - varied
shackles held them back from the punctuated shift to a new, more advanced
equilibrium. Russia, China, much of Latin America and Africa - for them, the leap to
being honestly modern was fatally elusive. Even today, they struggle to catch up.

Weare now in the earliest stages of a shift that promises to be still more
consequential than the one that enlightened and industrialized our world over
several centuries after the Dark Ages. The essence of this shift is best captured by
the prodigious explosion of different types of connection emerging around us now -
financial, trade, information, transport, biological - and the innovative combinations
that follow these and other fast, fresh links. Modern, highly-connected systems are
different than those with less connection. And, as we'll come to see, they are
particularly different from those with slower connection. We experience power
through networks now, as once we experienced it through brick-bound institutions
like universities or military headquarters or telephone company switches. You can
no more understand the operations of Hizb’allah or China’s central bank or the most
valuable Internet companies today without at least this frank admission: Their

° On one side: William J. Baumol, Convergence of Productivity Cross-national Studies
and Historical Evidence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994)

10 This group mastered: See Joel Mokyr, “The European Enlightenment, the
Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth”, Max Weber Lecture,
European University, March 27, 2007

18

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018250
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017163.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

When I began teaching, Harvard Law School had been admitting women for only about a decade,
and some of the professors still didn’t believe that women could make really good lawyers. I
encountered this prejudice at the end of my first year of teaching.

The star student in my first year class was a woman from New York who eventually became a
distinguished judge. She received an A grade on the final exam. Three of her other first year
teachers also gave her A grades, but her contracts teacher gave her a D. She came to me upset
about her D grade and asked me to read her exam. I read it and it was clearly of A quality. I was
sure that her contracts professor had simply made a transcription error and so I went to his office
to discuss it. He glanced at the exam and said, “Oh yes, I remember her. She doesn’t think like a
lawyer. That’s why I gave her a D.” I later learned that this professor has been opposed to
admitting women to Harvard Law School because he believed that women don’t think like
lawyers.

This episode persuaded me that something had to be done about the lingering prejudices of some
of the faculty. Accordingly, I proposed “blind grading” of all exams, so that professors could not
find out the gender of the student until after the grades were submitted.

Several years later, my wife and I, and my son Elon, had dinner with then President Clinton and
the First Lady. We had invited them to our synagogue on Martha’s Vineyard for Rosh Hashanah
services and they asked us to join them for dinner after the services. (More on this later) During
dinner, I asked Hillary why she had chosen Yale Law School over Harvard. She laughed and
said, “Harvard didn’t want me.” I said I was sorry that Harvard had turned her down, but she
replied “no, I received letters of acceptance from both schools.” She explained that a then
boyfriend had invited her to The Harvard Law School Christmas dance, at which several Harvard
Law School professors were in attendance. She was introduced to one of them and asked him for
advice about which law school to attend. The professor looked at her and said, “We have about
as many women as we need here. You should go to Yale. The teaching there is more suited to
women.” I asked her who the professor was and she told me she couldn’t remember his name but
that she thought it started with a “B.” A few days later, we met the Clintons at a party. I came
prepared with yearbook photos of all the professors from that year whose name began with “B.”
She immediately identified the culprit. He was the same professor who had give my A student a
D, became she didn’t think like a lawyer. It turned out, of course, that it was this professor—and
not the two brilliant women he was prejudiced against—who didn’t think like a lawyer. Lawyers
are supposed to act on the evidence, rather than on their prejudgments. The sexist professor
ultimately became a judge on the Internal Court of Justice—a perfect fit! (More on this later.)

Nor was Professor “B” alone in his negative views of women as lawyers. One teacher refused to
call on women, except on one day of the year, which he called “ladies day.” On that day, he
picked on them and verbally abused them to the point that some deliberately stayed away. The
dean of the law school, Erwin Griswold, a great defender of civil liberties and civil rights, was a
blatant misogynistic. Near the beginning of my teaching career, he invited the new assistant
professor—me—and all the women students—a small number—to his home for dinner. He
warned the women that if they came to law school to find husbands, they would be disappointed:
“Harvard Law School men don’t date Harvard Law School girls. They date girls from Lesley” (a
neighboring women’s college). He then went around the table asking all the women students why

76

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017163
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015572.txt,"Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 17 of 23

V: Yes, he did. He did all the time. The worst one that I heard from his own mouth was this
pretty 12 year old girls he had flown in for his birthday. It was a surprise birthday gift
from one of his friends and they were from France. I did see them, I did meet them.
Jeffrey bragged afterwards after he met them that they were 12 year olds and flown over
from France because they’re really poor over there, and their parents needed the money
or whatever the case is and they were absolutely free to stay and flew out. Those were
the worst ones. He was constantly bragging about girls’ ages or where he got them from
or their past and how terrible their past was and good he is making it for them.

JS: Where were the 12 year old girls flown to from France? Where did they come to?
V: Palm Beach.

JS: | And were they flown in on Jeff's private plane or did they get transported?

V: No. They were transported by somebody else.

JS: | Ok. Was the sexual activity that went on on the airplane conducted in such a way so that
any of the crew was aware of what was going on?

V: They were told to knock if they had to come out, if the crew had to come out. They were
told, you know, to come out as little as possible, so they weren’t out there hanging out
watching everything, no, but it doesn’t take an idiot to put two and two together to say
well there’s a whole bunch of half dressed teenagers on board with this old man who is
constantly being massaged by them and he wants me to keep the door shut for what
reason? I mean, only they could put that together, but yeah, they knew.

JS: | Did Mr. Epstein ever talk to you about people of power and influence owing him favors?

V: He would laugh about it, you know, I never really knew what to take serious from Jeffrey
because he was such a funny character at times. You never knew if what he was saying
was true or not. Yeah, lots of people owed him favors from what he told me. He’s got
everybody in his pocket, and he would laugh about he helps people for the sole purpose
in the end they owe him something. That’s why I believe he does so many favors in the
first place.

JS: | When and how did you first become aware that Mr. Epstein was in trouble with the law?

V: I was first informed by, I think someone from the FBI called me first and started to ask
me questions, and J started to answer the questions but then fear took over, and I just said
look, I don’t know what’s going on, I’ve got a young family that I don’t want to risk, you
know, please don’t bother me about this again, and it was real short simple conversation,
and within a week or 2, I had gotten a call from Jeffrey’s attorney, and then a week later,
Jeffrey himself.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015572
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028241.txt,"/ BARAK / 107

determined to focus on the end goal: initially, at least, a framework agreement, and
over time a final political resolution of our conflict. Ever since the outbreak of the
Palestinians’ first intifada, I believed this was as much in Israel’s own interest as
theirs. Yet when I entered office, we had no way of knowing whether Arafat
wanted two states living side-by-side in peace. I felt it was my duty to find out,
and, if the answer was yes, to put a peace agreement in place. I felt the same about
way about Syria and Hafez al-Assad.

When I left office, I believed I had achieved the most important goals of my
premiership. We were out of Lebanon. Though we couldn’t achieve the peace
agreements I had hoped for, it was not for lack of trying. Along the way, Israel had
demonstrated to the world that it was able and willing to consider painful
compromises, and that it was the Arab leaders who, at least for now, were unequal
to the challenge of making peace. If I'd been able to retain the backing of the
voters who made me Prime Minister in 1999, we might even have moved ahead on
unilateral disengagement from the Palestinians, dramatically altering the trajectory
of our relationship. Yet even without that, Camp David did delineate the terms of
any future peace arrangement. When and if conditions allowed a resumption of
serious negotiating efforts, the shape, and indeed most of the details, of a final
peace between our peoples were now clear.

I was on holiday in the summer of 2001 when Clinton phoned me. 7he New
Times had run a piece on how and why the summit, and the subsequent
negotiations through the end of the year, ended in failure. When I later read the
article, by the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Deborah Sontag, I found it a
meandering mix of opinions garnered from an assortment of Americans,
Europeans, Israelis and Palestinians, including Arafat himself, with the overall
conclusion that Clinton and I had not offered as generous a deal as was assumed
and that it was somehow unfair to suggest the Palestinians deserved blame for
rejecting it. There had been several other articles in various publications along the
same lines. I didn’t see much point at this stage in setting the record straight. To
the extent the content of the Times piece bothered me, it was a simple, but
important, error of fact. Quoting Arafat himself, Sontag wrote that during the back-
patio discussion I had with him at the dinner in Kochav Yair shortly before the new
intifada, he’d “implored me to block Mr Sharon’s plans” to visit the Temple
Mount. Arafat didn’t raise the issue at all, and presumably knew that we had
consulted his West Bank security chief to ensure it happened quickly, avoided the

393
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028241
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021220.txt,"HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021220
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027172.txt,"GUID: 1F897C5A-8AFD-4EAB-B78C-F7ES58B6A9501

Message: Why does bg get kicked around like this? So silly

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/22/17 08:25:33 AM (509473533)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2D3672ED-EF8F-4750-B587-OC11F3AE902D

Message: using the zero knowledge proof concept to keep totally private and secure the
personal health info of the person while the same time being able to use the
underlying date to create a usable data base.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/22/17 08:26:57 AM (509473617)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F3542512-42A1-48B1-A612-ADFA439388DD

Message: either a version of block chain, encryption or personal cloud. protecting the
rights of the people at risk. deliverable. working with cyber security experts to
craft a system designed for both security but access to digitally redacted prersonal
info.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/22/17 08:27:29 AM (509473649)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: B544E36A-5B9C-4377-9589-90CDS57C54DF1

Message: see working with the cyber security people as well as hippo.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/22/17 08:28:07 AM (509473687)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: A747FAF2-C88C-4180-BD7/3-23960EFEB6BC

Message: possibly the next version of a wearable. a sensor that has protected input
based on personal history etc.

sender:

Time: 02/22/17 08:29:09 AM (509473749)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027172
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029084.txt,"From: cj

Sent: 12/12/2016 6:26:29 PM

To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: From Politico Magazine

Any ideas?

Begin forwarded message:

From: Margaret Slattery (i >

Subject: From Politico Magazine
Date: November 28, 2016 at 3:04:51 PM CST

To: i <i >
Dear Joi,

Hello, I’m writing from Politico Magazine, where we’re working on a special package of stories timed to Donald Trump’s
inauguration in January, and | wondered if you would be interested in contributing.

As he prepares to take office, our plan is to publish a handful of out-of-the box ideas for President Trump, suggested by
writers and thinkers from a variety of fields and ideological positions. Whether the idea has to do with politics, policy,
personnel or governing style, we’re looking for suggestions that are specific and, above all, surprising; something inventive if
slightly far-fetched is better than a pet cause or a well-trod policy proposal. (This exercise doesn’t require that you support or
even agree with Trump, but it does require a willingness to engage.)

Do you have an idea along these lines that you wish the new president would consider, whether something in economics or
otherwise? If so, I’d love to hear, and we can discuss next steps from there. Ultimately, we’re aiming to publish a handful of
short pieces (about 800 words each) as a package of proposals.

Many thanks, and please let me know if you have questions.

Margy Slattery

_ _ Politico Magazine

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029084
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029005.txt,"From: 
Sent: 9/17/2016 12:33:56 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
I didn't call to confirm because I attributed it to your scatterbrained quality and I just assumed that plans had 
changed and you weren't able to make it. In this civilized society the person being invited doesn't usually have 
to hound the host. And incidentally Woody doesn't feel dressed unless his clothes have holes in them. 
Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone 
On Sep 17, 2016, at 8:24 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
im surprised you didnt call to confirm? :) . re regifting you just have to find people wth the same 
initials. . i thought that woody might like to try something that is super soft and doesnt have holes 
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:04 AM, wrote: 
Thank you for the sweatshirts. The thought was very sweet. Next time you send a gift don't put any initials on 
it so when I regift it no one will suspect. Also in the future think jewelry. You didn't misunderstand. With you 
I never know what your plans are so since I didn't hear a confirmation from you or your assistant I assumed 
your plans had changed and you weren't able to do dinner. Just like the Paris trips :-). 
Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone 
On Sep 17, 2016, at 7:54 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
no problem , I thought you told me that you had moved krause so that you could come sunday. . i must 
have misunderstood. . the sweatshirts were given to a few world leaders yesterday, so i thought you two 
should also have some. . 
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:51 AM, wrote: 
We already have plans on Sunday as I didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them. 
Sent from Soon-Yi's iPhone 
On Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
trumps guys changing their plans . all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a 
bad movie, president trump. down the street from trump hotel. deepak chopra, again, sunday, I know 
you moved krause to tonight.. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029005 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029006 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013562.txt,"screaming orgasms, potentiated by a natural inclination to bifurcate, would be so
messianic as to carry me along to a transcendentally erotic new place.
Unfortunately, paranoid rages, bursts of promiscuity and hopeless inconsistency of
goals and efforts dominated the remainder of our living days.

Further Readings for TRANSMOGRIFICATIONS OF ENERGIES

Religions in Four Dimensions; Existential, Aesthetic, Historical, Comparative, Walter

Kaufman, Reader’s Digest Press, 1976

Religious and Spiritual Groups in Modern America, Robert S. Ellwood, Prentice-
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1973.

The Evangelicals, What They Believe, Who They Are, Where They are Changing,
David F. Wells and John D. Woodbridge, Abington Press, Nashville, 1975

A Nation of Believers, Martin Marty, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976

Conversion: Christian and Non-Christian, Alfred C. Underwood, George Allen,
Unwin Ltd., London, 1925

Eros and the Sacred, Paul Avis, SPCK, London, 1989

Mukteshwari, The Way of Muktananda, SYDA Foundation, Ganeshpuri, India, 1972

Godtalk, Travels in Spiritual America, Brad Gooch, Knopf, N.Y. 2002

The Beat of a Different Drum; The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, Jadish
Mehra, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994

62

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013562
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016053.txt,"HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016053
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018631.txt,"emotional signals -- so tried inviting Richard for dinner, and he didn't answer my text
messages. When I finally ran into Richard, I asked why he'd been ignoring me, and he
laughed. ""I knew you'd accuse me of ignoring you,"" he said. I felt like I'd walked into a
trap.

I was hurt, obviously. I was surprised by how hurt I was. The problem with my youthful
water metaphor is that water is basically invulnerable, but I am not... and when I was
younger and more open, I had much more trouble setting important boundaries.

On the other hand, I had to admit that it was funny, too. I mean, it wasn't like I didn't see
this coming. I mean, my coming-out story includes a portrait of Richard at his most
difficult. One of the friends I share with Richard made a comment about leopards and
spots. Maybe my life is a soap opera, but it could also be a sitcom with the most amazing
characterization ever.

I enlisted a cold, brilliant, evil-hearted friend to help draft my final letter to Richard. The
letter was very short. Arguably, it was brutal. It read:

Economists recognize that the most robust relationships are formed through a plethora
of implicit agreements. Apparently, these agreements are not present, and probably won't
be. Cheers.

Economics arguments in the comments are encouraged. More importantly, readers may
feel free to steal that letter for use on whoever is trying to pull their chain.

te Ok ok

I received a couple texts from Mr. Ambition, a few days after he gave me the fan. He said
there had been a death in his family. ""But I don't want to talk about that, actually,” he
wrote. ""I just want to check in and see how you're doing.”

I thought about how he laughed when he was hurt. I thought about how he'd once told me
that he wanted drama. I thought about his confusing reactions to S&M. I thought about
how he outsourced his emotional labor to his friends. I thought about all the emotion I'd
felt in him, coiled and caught and turned in on itself like a caged dragon.

I wondered if he wanted me to push him to talk.

""I'm so sorry,"" I texted back. ""But I understand if you don't want to talk about it. I'm
doing fine.”

He invited me to a social event a week later, but I declined. I didn't reach out to him for a
while after that, and he didn't reach out to me. I heard later that Mr. Ambition asked one
of my friends whether they thought he owed me anything.

My friend told him, quite accurately: ""No, you don't owe her anything.""

If anything, I owe him. I'm not sure what I owe him, but I'm sure I owe him something.
A billion dollars? Vegan smoothies?

Chemistry?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018631
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027028.txt,"From: Pritzker, Tom 
Sent: 5/23/2013 3:15:37 AM 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Fwd: Pritzker Alert 
Attachments: image001.jpg 
Importance: High 
I clearly did something wrong in my last life to have to deal w this bullshit. AND I warned her. 
-------- Original message -------- 
From: ""Eisenberg, Marshall E."" < 
Date: 
To: ""Pritzker, Tom"" < 
Subject: Fwd: Pritzker Alert 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Kaczorowski, Monice M."" 
Date: May 22, 2013, 8:54:07 PM CDT 
To: 
I."" 
Subject: Pritzker Alert 
WashingtonPost.com<http://WashingtonPost.com> 
Copyright 2013 The Washington Post 
May 22, 2013 
,""Miller, Glen"" 
""Richman, Lawrence 
Section: in-the-loop 
Obama nominee Penny Pritzker's $80 million mistake 
President Obama's billionaire nominee to head the Commerce Department, Penny Prizker, understated her 
income by $80 million. 
Emily Heil 
Hey, these things happen: Penny Pritzker, President Obama's nominee to lead the Commerce Department, 
understated her income by some $80 million and had to file a correction to her government-filed 
disclosures, Bloomberg is reporting. 
That might sound like a lot of money, but it's all relative. Pritzker, whose family founded the Hyatt 
hotel chain, is worth about $1.5 billion. So it's easy to see how a few million — or 80 — could go 
missing. 
Maybe she left it in the other purse? 
A spokeswoman told Bloomberg that the $80 million was ""a substantial amount"" and that Pritzker's advisers 
corrected the error as soon as they realized it. 
Per Bloomberg: ""Documents released last week show Pritzker received $32.2 million for a decade's worth of 
consulting on the restructuring of domestic trusts,"" but new filings indicated she made at least $80 
million more than that. 
Monice M. Kaczorowski 
Chief Knowledge Officer 
NEAL • GERBER • EISENBERG 
Two North LaSalle Street • Suite 1700 
Chica o IL • 60602-3801 
direct 
fax 
mailto:mkaczorowski@ngelaw.com> 
www.nge law.com< ttp: www.ngelaw.com/<http://www.ngelaw.com<http://www.ngelaw.com/» 
[cid:image001.jpg@OlCE572E.7E4D4B70]<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/monice-kaczorowski/6/44/367/> 
Please consider the environment before printing this email. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027028 
Confidentiality Notice: This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information. If 
you have received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete it and any 
attachments without copying or further transmitting the same. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027029 
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056.txt,"Date: Friday, March 4 2011 04:45 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: The Duke

just got it two minutes ago.. I ve asked g lawyers to send a letter. Not sure,, it is so salcisous and ridiculous, 1m
not sure how to respond,, the only person she didn't have sex with was Elvis

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM, The Duke <> wrote:

What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
To: The Duke

Sent: Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011

Subject: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com >
Date: Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM
Subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell

To: J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com >

non=- Forwarded Message

From: Mark Cohen >
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500

To: NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com >

Subject: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell

FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise.

From:

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM
To: Brett D. Jaffe

Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell

Dear Brett Jaffe,

I left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine
Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.

We urgently require responses from_Ms Maxwell to the following guestions. Our deadline is noon

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018278.txt,"programmer’s line, runs on a very fast clock in a world of constant innovation, and it
applies to nations and ideologies, your habits and mine. Think of General Liu again
for amoment: “A major state can lose many battles.” Those five lost American wars
over the last 50 years weren’t fatal. They wore only a bit on our national pride and
our position because they weren't strategic losses. But our next errors, which may
come without the firing of a single shot, could be far more costly because of the slick,
strategic slope on which we are now moving. “It is one thing to struggle heroically to
get out of danger,” Liu wrote in another manifesto. “But it’s better to see the danger
before it even begins to sprout.”5¢

Six paradoxes trace the immensity of the gaps we now face.

First: We find ourselves confronted, almost daily, with an unnerving mismatch
between our interests and our means. The most powerful nation in human history
finds itself unable to achieve even simple military and diplomatic goals.

Second: A global crisis of faith in our institutions is now under way. No significant
institution, from the US congress to the Euro to your local newspaper, is more
trusted than it was a decade ago. Many of our most essential institutions seem
destined to be victims to the logic of “forced obsolescence” that makes our phones,
our cars and our televisions of ten years ago feel like antiques.

Third: The connected age lets us see and measure, with historic precision, the
problems we face - yet we can do almost nothing about them. Global warming,
wealth inequality, species destruction, nuclear accidents, terror killings - we can see
all of these in rattlingly sharp detail, instantly, miraculously. Watch the Fukishima
reactor meltdown! See BP oil leak into the Gulf of Mexico in HD! The rise and fall of
markets, the moves of distant wars, rivers of refugees appear almost as if we were
tuning into a football game. But we can only watch. “Hey, do something!” we want to
shout as we see financial or ideological or religious chaos spill towards us. But
nothing seems to move; and what does move makes the problems worse. This
impotence of being “just spectators”, works like a nutcracker on the credibility of
the people and institutions we expect to fix these problems.

Fourth: Many new challenges exhibit a worrying non-linearity. Small forces produce
massive effects. One radical teenager, a single mis-placed commodity order, or a few
bad lines of computer code can paralyze an entire system. The scale of this
whiplashing grows every day, because the network itself grows, it turns pindrop
noises into global avalanches. Dangers, accidents, crises were once local. A drought
in California was, largely, a drought in California. A slowdown in China hit Shenzhen
or Shanghai, not South America. Now, as networks overlap and influence each other,
crises cascade at a new, stunning and comprehensive scale. And while we know

56 “It is one thing to struggle”: Liu Yazhou, “Tan junshi gaige yu quojia anquan
wenti”

46

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018278
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025304.txt,"Laffer Associates Game On [Updated 7/6/2016]

Table 2
Primaries Following May 3""4

Republican Primary Turn Out % Increase = =%Increase Democrat Primary TurnOut Increase Democrat Democrat
2016 from 2016 from 2016 from Advantage Advantage
2008 2012 2016 2008 2012 2008 2016 2008 2008** 2016**
Nebraska 136,648 185,402 197,430 44.5% 6.5% N/A Caucus N/A N/A N/A
West Virginia Caucus 112,416 202,880 N/A 80.5% 456,282 241,016 -47.2% N/A 38,136
Kentucky Caucus Caucus Caucus N/A N/A 701,768 454 573 -35.2% N/A N/A
Oregon 353,476 287,955 408,937 15.7% 42.0% 641,499 641,595 0.0% 288,023 232,658
Washington 529,932 Caucus 608,128 14.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
California 2,932,812 | 1,924,970 | 2,162,810 -26.3% 12.4% 5,066,992 4,966,115 -2.0% 2,134,180 2,803,305
Montana 95,730 140,457 156,888 63.9% 11.7% 273,793 126,376 -53.8% 178,063 (30,512)
New Jersey 566,201 231,465 443,724 -21.6% 91.7% 1,141,199 877,496 -23.1% 574,998 433,772
New Mexico 110,939 92,930 104,627 -5.7% 12.6% Caucus 216,075 N/A N/A 111,448
South Dakota 60,964 58,292 66,879 9.7% 14.7% 97,797 53,006 -45.8% 36,833 (13,873)
Total Votes* 4,256,770 2,921,471 3,541,295 16.8% 21.2% 12.2% 3,212,097 3,425,350
EW % Change 11.9% 34.0% -29.6%

*Total Votes are only summed for states that held primaries in 2008, 2012 & 2016
**Democrat Advantage is summed only for states that have had both a Republican and Democrat primary in 2016

While caucus numbers are influenced by a number of factors other than voter turnout and electorate preferences, their
implications are little different from those of the primary states.

Again these results have to be concerning for Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Table 3
Caucuses and Mixed Caucuses/Primaries Completed as of May 3¢

Republican Caucus Turn Out ‘s Increase =“ Increase | Democrat Caucus Turn Out | “% Increase Democrat Democrat
2016 from 2016 from 2016 from Advantage Advantage
2008 2012 2016 2008 2012 | 2008 2016 2008 2008** 2016**
Alaska 15,000 14,135 21,930 46.2% 55.1% 8,621 10,600 23.0% (6,379) (11,330)
Colorado 65,400 66,027 N/A N/A N/A 120,001 123,508 2.9% 54,601 N/A
Hawaii N/A 10,228 13,377 N/A 30.8% 37,426 33,716 -9.9% N/A 20,339
Idaho Primary 44,672 Primary N/A N/A 21,224 23,884 12.5% N/A N/A
lowa 118,696 | 121,354 186,874 574% 54.0% 236,000 171,109 -27.5% 117,304 (15,765)
Kansas 19,432 29,857 73,116 276.3% 144.9% 37,089 40,000 7.8% 17,657 (33,116)
Kentucky 205,226 | 176,160 229,667 11.9% 30.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Maine 5,338 5,814 18,650 249.4% 220.8% 44,670 46,000 3.0% 39,332 27,350
Minnesota 62,828 48,916 114,245 81.8% 133.6% 214,066 207,109 -3.2% 151,238 92,864
Nebraska N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 38,670 33,460 -13.5% N/A N/A
Nevada 44,315 32,894 75,216 69.7% 128.7% 117,559 84,000 -28.5% 73,244 8,784
Utah Primary Primary 177,204 N/A N/A Primary 77,344 N/A N/A (99,860)
Wyoming 1,200 1,308 N/A N/A N/A 8,753 7,000 -20.0% 7,553 N/A
Total Votes* 470,835 429,130 719,698 52.9% 67.7% 884,079 780,386 -11.7% 454,550 (10,734)
EW % Change 113.3% 99.8% 4.9%

*Total Votes are summed only for states that held caucuses in 2008, 2012 and 2016
**Democrat Advantage is only summed for states that have had both a Republican and Democrat caucus in 2016

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025304
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014644.txt,"US - Transportation Coverage Cluster
BofA Merrill Lynch

Investment rating Company ticker Bloomberg symbol Analyst
BUY
Canadian Pacific Railway cP CPUS Ken Hoexter
CSX Corporation CSX CSX US Ken Hoexter
FedEx Corp. FDX FDX US Ken Hoexter
Fortress Transportation & Infrastructure FTAI FTAI US Ariel Rosa
Golar LNG Limited GLNG GLNG US Ken Hoexter
Golar LNG Partners LP GMLP GMLP US Ken Hoexter
Hoegh LNG Partners LP HMLP HMLP US Ken Hoexter
J.B. Hunt Transport Services JBHT JBHT US Ken Hoexter
Norfolk Southern NSC NSC US Ken Hoexter
Scorpio Tankers Inc. STNG STNG US Ken Hoexter
Swift Transportation SWFT SWFT US Ken Hoexter
Triton International, Ltd TRIN TRIN US Ken Hoexter
Union Pacific UNP UNP US Ken Hoexter
UPS UPS UPS US Ken Hoexter
NEUTRAL
ArcBest Corporation ARCB ARCB US Ken Hoexter
Genesee & Wyoming GWR GWR US Ken Hoexter
Kansas City Southern KSU KSU US Ken Hoexter
Knight Transport KNX KNX US Ken Hoexter
Navios Maritime Midstream Partners L.P. NAP NAP US Ken Hoexter
The Greenbrier Companies GBX GBX US Ken Hoexter
World Fuel Services INT INT US Ken Hoexter
UNDERPERFORM
C.H. Robinson CHRW CHRW US Ken Hoexter
Canadian National CNI CNIUS Ken Hoexter
Kirby Corp KEX KEX US Ken Hoexter
Old Dominion Freight Line ODFL ODFL US Ariel Rosa
Seaspan Corp SSW SSW US Ken Hoexter
Teekay Tankers Limited TNK TNK US Ken Hoexter
Werner Enterprises WERN WERN US Ken Hoexter
me peorlgalinll Top 10 US Ideas Quarterly | 03 January 2017-23

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014644
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031282.txt,"DARREN K. INDYKE

DARREN kK. INDYKE, PLLC
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, New York 10022

KKKKKEK KEKE KEK KEKE EK KEKE EK KEK EK EEE KKK KE KEE KKK EK EK EK EE EK EE KEK EK KEK EK KK EK EK EK KEK EE EK EK EK EKER EEK KEK EE EK EKEE KEKE EEEE

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.

Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2016 Darren K.

Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved.

KKKEKEKKKEKEKEK KEKE KEK KEKE KKK KKK KKK EK EK KEK EK KEK EK EK EK EKER KE KRE KKK EK EE EKER EK EK KEK EE EK EK EK KEE EEK EEK EK EE EK EE EEE EKER ER

Begin forwarded message:

From: ""Michael, Charles"" <cmichael@Steptoe.com>

Subject: RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF
BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK
WRITING TEAM !!t

Date: August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT

To: 'Darren Indyke' <dkiesq@aol.com>

Darren:

Charles

From: Darren Indyke [mailto:dkiesq@aol.com]

Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM

To: Michael, Charles

Subject: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE
JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031282
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032533.txt,"communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032533
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028269.txt,"/ BARAK / 135

Yet especially with my main points of contact in the administration — first Bob
Gates and then his successor, Leon Panetta, as Secretary of Defense —our broadly
shared views, mutual respect, and the strength of the US-Israeli alliance
outweighed any of that. Neither they, nor indeed President Obama, wavered from
their commitment to the principle that Israel needed to retain our “qualitative
military advantage” over any combination of threats we might face, nor to the $3
billion package of annual US aid that underpinned it. We were even able to agree
on additional US backing for our increasingly effective range of anti-missile
systems: the Arrow, against long-range ballistic missiles, developed in
coordination with the US defense contractor Raytheon; “David’s Sling,” to target
enemy forces’ mid-range missiles, cruise missiles and aircraft; and our new Iron
Dome system, integrating sophisticated Israeli radar and guidance technology and
designed to deal with the missile threat from Hizbollah on our northern border and
Hamas in Gaza. It had not yet been used in battle. But from test firings, we were
confident it could destroy incoming rockets with nearly 90-per-cent success.

By late 2011, the issue of Iran had taken on much greater urgency. There was
still no sign the American-led diplomatic efforts were succeeding in removing the
nuclear threat. As for an American military strike, though the President
intermittently declared that “all options” remained on the table, I knew from senior
administration members that it was extremely unlikely to happen. Iran, meanwhile,
had been acquiring thousands more centrifuges, more uranium, and heavier
protection around its key sites. And the “window of vulnerability” was now only
about a year away.

Operationally and politically, at least now a majority of the key players in Israel
agreed that we had to be prepared to take military action if there was no alternative
way to rein in the Iranians. Ashkenazi’s successor as chief-of-staff, Benny Gantz,
had signed off on the attack plan. While the Iranians were getting ever closer to
nuclear-weapons capability, the strike force that we were assembling was also
better equipped, trained and prepared to mount a complex, yet almost certainly
successful, operation. The damage to Iran’s nuclear ambitions would be
considerably less than if we had acted earlier. But our intelligence analysts still
estimated we could set back the Iranians’ program by about two years.

The immediate problem turned out to be timing. A major joint military exercise
with the Americans, agreed on two years earlier, was due to take place in Israel in
April 2012. It would include Patriot missile batteries, naval vessels, and thousands

421
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028269
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021208.txt,"until many years to come was “ Have a good life!” With that statement he
slammed down phone receiver. Leaving only an echo of the dial tone to
answer back too. I was to paralyzed from the shocking response. “What
have I just done?” was the first thing that entered my thoughts.
Overwhelmed with guilt I felt like I was falling down a deep and dark
hole and then the tears began to flood in. Here I was standing at the dawn
of a new happy life for myself and I couldn’t see past how bad I had let
Jeffrey down not yet seeing the hold he had on me.

Like my knight on a white horse, in came my hero to soothe my
somberness. He rushed over to the bed where I was beating myself up
mentally and wiped the falling tears from my cheeks. “I take it that it
didn’t go so well...huh?” Sniffling through my sobs I managed to tell
him that “It doesn’t matter anymore all I care about is you and leaving all
of that life behind me!” I wrapped my arms around him and he asked me
in a half joking voice “Then why are you crying?” He got me almost
laughing now too “I guess it’s just so scary taking such a huge plunge
away from what I’m used too and taking such a big move to another
country. It’s just all so different and I’m just trying to comprehend
everything that is happening in such a short time.” Always out to lift my
spirits his next comments made me gush in laughter “You think that was
a hard phone call wait until I call my Sicilian mother! Watch this, I know
exactly what she’ll say. First it’ll be a saga about how I’m killing her with
my selfish actions then it’ll be about how she’s going to kill herself for
doing such a terrible job raising normal children. Don’t worry though,
she’ll love every second of it. Wogs thrive off of the drama in their lives
and off everybody else’s for that matter!!” He was pretty much on the dot
when he told me how she’d react to the news. In the end after relentlessly
trying to change his mind, she sighed, “If it was going to be anybody to
do something as crazy as this, Robbie, it would be you!” It wasn’t a
blessing as such but at least she wasn’t threatening suicide any longer.

Calling the closest of our families the night before our wedding to share
with them our announcement wasn’t celebrated by any members of either
sides but that didn’t discern us one bit. My parents took it well,
considering their only daughter was marrying a foreign man that they
didn’t know from the next guy on the street and too top it off I was
moving to Australia, permanently. When I asked my Dad many years
later why they hadn’t put up a fight, he just simply replied that nobody
expected it too last very long. Fair enough, | thought. I don’t think
anyone did at first...even us at our toughest times. We were a rare
attribute these days in the numb era we have all been accustomed to
living in, turning nothing into something, which I had also come to
realize, was the most precious gift in life... Love.

127

Falling asleep was easy to do in his arms that night. I laid my head on
top of his chest listening to the drum of his beating heart. I had never felt
like I was more at home than ever before in my life. He pulled me gently
in closer to him, letting me know that he was there for me even when the
lights went out and the thoughts would usually creep in. Amazing how he
knew what I needed without even asking for it. Wishing for something
like this my whole life I thought I was being such a fool in so many ways,
but I was so wrong. The way his pretty eyes looked at me with such an
understanding and compassionate sincerity made me want to trust his
words and believe the love that he was offering me was indeed real.

The next morning, Robbie was up and out of bed early to pick up our
tailored wedding suits and dresses for our big day at Doi Cept Temple.
His best friend from high school days that was travelling with him from
Australia met him in the hotel lobby at seven o’clock. He was going to be
joining us for the wedding as Robbie’s best man. He still hadn’t been able
to find black shoes to go with the suit, so after he dropped off my dress
back to me he was off again to try and find himself a pair of decent
looking ones. Overjoyed with excitement I was thrilled from the second I
kissed Robbie good-bye for the last time before we were officially
married. Looking in the same mirror only a week ago I was now a
different person, I felt like I was plunging into a bottomless abyss. Here I
go, | thought to myself as | plunged out the door letting the butterflies in
my stomach carry me all the way to my nearly husband.

I had to go to the beauticians that morning for my pre- wedding makeup
and dressing. The ladies who were doing my hair and face at the salon did
a great job making me feel so beautiful for my special occasion that every
girl dreams about their whole entire life. Requesting simplicity at best,
not wanting to go overboard with all of the wedding apparel! they tied my
long hair up into a knot wrapping around it a veil of flowers made up of
baby’s breath and small yellow and purple budding flowers. I couldn't
have dreamt it up better myself and when | met-my husband to be at the
bottom of the mountain he stood before me speechless “You look so...
beautiful!” were his first words that his mouth formed almost whispering
them. He took my hand and we walked into the sky lift together. Behind
us followed an interpreter that Robbie hired to translate the Buddhist
Monks ceremony speech for us English only speakers and then his best
friend, who only moments before gave him the best mans speech about
being the last chance to walk away from this and not get married to a girl
he hardly knew, but my Robbie wouldn’t hear a word of it. He already
made up his mind the instant he proposed and I said yes, “I was born to
be with this girl,” he told his best mate. “Alright then lets go do this
then!” Once he knew Robbie was sure in his decision he was more than
ecstatic for him. We were slowly lifted up the tremendous mountainside,

128

| Copyright Protected Material C Copyright Protected Material
CONFIDENTIAL GIUFFRE004260 CONFIDENTIAL. GIVI RL00426 |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021208
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030822.txt,"Eye on the Market | November 21, 2011 J.P Morgan

Topic: The quixotic search for energy solutions

The material contained herein is intended as a general market commentary. Opinions expressed herein are those of Michael Cembalest and may differ from those of other J.P.
Morgan employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes J.P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further, the views expressed herein may
differ from that contained in J.P. Morgan research reports. The above summary/prices/quotes/statistics have been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable, but we do not
guarantee their accuracy or completeness, any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. References to the
performance or character of our portfolios generally refer to our Balanced Model Portfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan. It is a proxy for client performance and may not
represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique
objectives of each client and is serviced through distinct legal entities licensed for specific activities. Bank, trust and investment management services are provided by J.P.
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A, and its affiliates. Securities are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), Member NYSE, FINRA and SIPC and Chase Investment
Services Corp., (CISC) member FINRA and SIPC. Securities products purchased or sold through JPMS or CISC are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(""FDIC""); are not deposits or other obligations of its bank or thrift affiliates and are not guaranteed by its bank or thrift affiliates; and are subject to investment risks, including
possible loss of the principal invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitable for all investors. Speak with your J.P. Morgan Representative concerning your personal
situation. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Private Investments may engage in leveraging and other
speculative practices that may increase the risk of investment loss, can be highly illiquid, are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve
complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to suitable investors through a confidential
offering memorandum which fully describes all terms, conditions, and risks.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Accordingly, any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained herein (including
any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, in connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with
JPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax-related penalties. Note that J.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance
provider. ©2011 JPMorgan Chase & Co; All rights reserved

9

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030822
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016533.txt,"Page 24 of 42
103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *890

But that distinction has an upside: private prosecution and judicial review do not work in cases in which there is no direct
victim - or in which private parties do not realize they have been victimized, as in some cases of large-scale corporate or
government fraud, or in some cases of child pornography. !47 Federal prosecutors, however, take on just such cases as a core
part of their enforcement agenda. '48 On the other hand, federal oversight is limited in other important respects: federal
criminal enforcement authority is not fully coextensive with state criminal law; notably, for example, it provides effectively no

enforcement redundancy for ordinary domestic violence, rape, and other sexual assault offenses. '4°

[*891]
B. Three Kinds of Offenses: Corruption, Police Violence, Sexual Assault

Consider the efficacy for these oversight options with respect three types of offenses: local fraud or corruption, excessive use
of force and other wrongdoing by local law enforcement officers, and sexual assaults. These three classes of offenses have in
common that they have proven to be especially vulnerable to underenforcement. At the same time, the differences in how U.S.
criminal justice institutions have responded to underenforcement in each area highlight the efficacy and limits of the
federalism-based enforcement redundancy compared to the alternatives - both those U.S. jurisdictions reject (private
prosecution and judicial review) and a fourth, unique strategy they embrace: politically accountable prosecutors.

1. Public Corruption

Corrupt conduct by government officials is a category of wrongdoing especially likely to suffer from underenforcement, for
obvious reasons: we depend on one set of public officials, prosecutors and investigative agents, to stop wrongdoing by other
public officials - as well as by colleagues within their own ranks. Professional and even personal relationships often exist
between these groups of public officials. Even when the boundaries between lawful and unlawful conduct are clear and law

112 R (Da Silva) v. DPP [2006] EWHC (Admin) 3204 [24] (Eng. and Wales) (summarizing three grounds for review and citing R v. DPP
[1995] (QB) 1 Crim. App. 136 (Eng.)); R (Guest) v. DPP [2009] EWHC (Admin.) 594, [2009] 2 Crim. App. 26, at P 34 (Eng. and Wales); R
v. General Council of the Bar [1990] 3 All ER 137 (QB), at 137-38 (Eng. and Wales). For an overview, see Ashworth & Redmayne, supra
note 111; Christopher Hilson, Discretion to Prosecute and Judicial Review, Crim. L. Rev. 739 (1993) (examining case law regarding
prosecution decisions and subsequent judicial review); Appeals: Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Decisions, CPS,
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/appeals -judicial-review-prosecutorial-decisions (last updated May 21, 2009). The European
Convention on Human Rights may impose affirmative obligations on member states that certain instances require prosecutions, or that more
generally require a state to maintain a criminal justice system that provides sufficient protection to citizens. English courts found that their
established standards of review of noncharging decisions, based in domestic law, have been held sufficient to meet any such obligation. See R
(FB) v. DPP [2009] EWHC (Admin.) 106,[2009] Crim. App. 38, at P 64 (Eng. and Wales) (discussing state obligations under Articles 2 and
3); see also R v. Killick [2011] EWCA (Crim.) 1608, [2012] 1 Crim. App. 10 at [48] (confirming victims' right to review). Judges may
require disclosure of internal prosecution documents, but they assess the lawfulness of nonprosecution without examining the underlying
evidence. See R (Da Silva) v. DPP [2006] EWHC (Admin) 3204 [24] (Eng. and Wales) (noting use of redacted investigative report and case
notes from CPS but disavowing evaluation of evidence).

113 See R v. DPP [2001] QB 330 at 337 (Eng. and Wales); R v. Metro. Police Commr. [1958] 2 QB 118, at 123-25 (Eng. and Wales);
Ashworth & Redmayne, supra note 111, at 221-22. Decisions by U.S. courts give no special solicitude to instances of nonprosecution in the
wake of injuries or deaths caused by prison guards or other law enforcement officials. See, e.g., Leeke v. Timmerman, 454 U.S. 84, 85-87
(1981) (rejecting state prison inmates! federal civil claim alleging bad faith by state officials to block issuance of arrest warrants against
guards on allegations of unnecessary beatings during prison uprising); Jnmates of Attica Corr. Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F.2d 375, 382-83
(2d Cir. 1973) (rejecting request, on behalf of inmates injured or killed by state prison guards in the wake of a prison riot, that federal courts
compel state and federal prosecutors to charge guards, reaffirming that prosecutorial discretion is immune to judicial review). To facilitate
review, English prosecutors in some circumstances must provide public reasons for choosing not to file charges. See Jordan v. United
Kingdom (No. 2) [2003] 37 Eur. Ct. H.R. 52 PP 82-86, 122-23, 142-45 (holding that under article 2 of the European Convention on Human
Rights prosecutors should give reasons explaining a decision not to bring criminal charges after an investigation into a death caused by police
shootings); see also R v. DPP [2001] QB 330, at 347 (Lord Bingham, CJ) (Eng. and Wales) (""In the absence of compelling grounds for not
giving reasons, we would expect the Director to give reasons in such a case [of non-prosecution]: to meet the reasonable expectation of
interested parties that either a prosecution will follow or a reasonable explanation for not prosecuting be given ... .""); EU Council Directive
2012/29, supra note 100, art. 6, at 67 (requiring explanations to victims that can be subjected to review). Irish victim rights laws that took
effect in 2015 now require prosecutors to provide reasons to victims for declining to prosecute. See Mark Hilliard, New Laws on Rights of

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016533
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026522.txt,"whether or not to continue interacting with player 1. We find con-
ditions in which there is an equilibrium where player 2 chooses to
interact with player 1 only if player 1 cooperates without looking
(CWOL) and player 1 chooses to CWOL. We show that this equi-
librium is robust to both high degrees of rationality, as modeled by
subgame perfection and learning or evolutionary dynamics, as mod-
eled by the replicator dynamic. Using computer simulations, we
also show that it emerges with high frequency, even in the presence
of other equilibria. Additionally, we show that the ability for player
1 to avoid looking, and the ability for player 2 to detect looking
increases cooperation. We propose this model as a possible expla-
nation for a number of interesting phenomena, and thereby derive
novel predictions about these phenomena, including why we dislike
“flip-flopping” politicians and respect principled people more gen-
erally, why people cooperate intuitively, and why people feel disgust

when considering taboo trade-offs, and why people fall in love.

Cooperation occurs when we take on costs to help others. A key mechanism by which
cooperation is sustained is reciprocity: individuals condition their behavior on others’
past actions [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. In reality, we not only condition
on others’ past actions, but also on the decision-making process that lead to cooperation:
we place more trust in cooperators who do not take time to carefully weigh the costs of
cooperation and who do not try to collect data on such costs before deciding whether to
cooperate. For example, we are impressed by colleagues who agree to proofread a paper
without thinking twice, and view with suspicion those who ask, “how long will it take?”

before agreeing to attend a practice talk. Such considerations are left out of standard

2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026522
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020670.txt,"Photographer Donna Ferrato took this gruesome picture back in 1982 when photographing the lives of wealthy swingers.
The couple — Elisabeth and Bengt — were having an argument and it quickly escalated, resulting in Bengt hitting his
partner. The photographer wanted the photo to be published but many publishers refused and she only managed to do so
in 1991. The book was titled ‘Living With the Enemy’ and chronicled events of domestic violence. Thanks to Donna’s

efforts, Congress passed the Violence Against Women Act in 1994.

#5 Behind The Counter

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020670
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023730.txt,"Forthcoming (August 2011) Future Science edited by Max Brockman, Vintage Press, New York.

encourage cooperation between all living things when the nonhumans have no voice? Successful
species will likely be those that recognize, implicitly or explicitly, life’s interdependency. If
humans are to succeed as a species, our collective shame over destroying other life-forms should
grow in proportion to our understanding of their various ecological roles. Maybe the same
attention to one another that promoted our own evolutionary success will keep us from failing

the other species in life’s fabric and, in the end, ourselves.

ll

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023730
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025462.txt,"Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No

GUID: 5DD748B1-4E29-47F9-A57B-8F1D1089A22B

Message: High marks??

Sender:

Time: 05/13/19 01:34:09 AM (579429249)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 79EC79B6-3169-4D72-875D-134736C420D9

Message: Let me know when u can catch up

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/13/19 03:02:13 AM (579434533)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 6EBCFA3A-AFC1-4466-A7DA-BBDF3C27FAB9

Message: Free now?

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/13/19 03:04:11 AM (579434651)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8499461C-1811-4479-A492-6D9122 9ABB81

Message: These trade conversations are now part of the backdrop of global markets for
the next ... 10 to 20 years as these countries and economies work out their relative

place in the world and how we reorder the overall global structure to account for the
rise of China, to account for a multi-polar environment,"" he said.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/13/19 03:06:45 AM (579434805)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: BB9E7FDO-FF65-4463-A9E7-C1C4C74BE4 62

Message: Ill call you from a strange number. , just give me a time

Time: 05/13/19 03:17:30 AM (579435450)

Flags: 1060865

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025462
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033583.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 11/2/2016 8:53:35 PM 
To: Jack Goldberger 
; Darren Indyke 
https ://www.the guardian. com/us-news/20 1 6/jul/07/donald-trump-s exual-ass ault-lawsuits-norm-lub ow 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033583 
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032845.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 8/24/2015 11:16:47 AM 
To: Jonathan Farkas 
Subject: Re: (no subject) 
trump.,is scaring the market not china 
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM, < > wrote: 
jeffrey Hi what is the final outcome of this devaluation race is it a breton woods collapsapse and does it take the markets 
with it thanks Jonathan 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032845 
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022067.txt,"CHAPTER 23

Jeffrey Epstein: 1981

tain that his resignation had noth-

pstein will always main
into Bear Stearns and

ing to do with the SEC’s investigation
Edgar Bronfman's ill-fated attempt to take over St. Joe's.

But of course this raises the question: Why did Epstein resign

from Bear Stearns?

In his testimony
by the company’s investigation of a twenty-

he'd made to his friend Warren Eisen:
it at the time, he maintains, but if used to
might have been unethical, if not illegal.

before the SEC, Epstein says he was offended
thousand-dollar loan

On top of that, questions about E
In the end, Bear Stearns fined h

thing, to be sure. So muc
But $2,500 is not $250,000 or even

job as junior partner over that?

98

stein. Epstein didn’t know i
buy stock, such a loan d

pstein's expenses had come Up. -7
im $2,500—an embarrassing q
h for making full partner anytime soon. ©
$25,000. Who'd give up # i

Another one of Epst
say, “Jeffrey Epstein left
to strike out on his owr
some questions remain
given on April 1, 1981, |
and Robert Blackburn:

Q: Sir, are you aware tl
lating around your f

Bs leaving the firm?

A: I'm aware that there
Q: What rumors have y
A: Nothing to do with!
Q: Can you relate what
A: It was having to do\

As far as the investigat
tion; the first time a sec

no interest in Epstein’s ¢

Q: Mr. Epstein, did any
substance that you s
Minerals to the stal
mission? Has anyol
directly or indirecth
pensation for this p:
you from Bear Stez

| divulging informat

_ Commission?

A: No.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022067
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019249.txt,"Freedom House

Chapter 2

Propaganda at Home and Abroad

The following propositions have all appeared in the
Russian media over the past few years:

¢ The United States hired Islamic State terrorists
to sabotage the Russian commercial airliner that
was destroyed after takeoff in the Sinai in 2015.

¢ A three-year-old boy was crucified by the U.S.-
backed Ukrainian army in Slovyansk in 2014.

¢ The United States is planning a major war in Eu-
rope to enable Washington to cancel its national
debt.

¢ The downing of the Malaysian airliner over
eastern Ukraine in 2014 was in fact the central
ingredient in an elaborate, American-driven plot
to place blame on Russia.

e American policies will lead to a global “homosex-
ual sodomite tsunami.""

This is just a small sample of similar claims or conjec-
tures that have made their way into Russian news cov-
erage, especially in the wake of Moscow's occupation
of Crimea and invasion of eastern Ukraine. They stand
as areminder that under Vladimir Putin, the Russian
media environment has been transformed from one
marked by vibrancy and diverse opinions (if not high
professional standards) to one dominated by blatant
propaganda on the most sensitive international topics
of the day.

The basic regime narrative of U.S.-led conspiracy is
applied to a broad set of themes: depression in oil
prices, downgrading of Russia's credit ratings, political
change in Ukraine, Russia's Olympics doping scandal.
Every problem, Russians are told, is due to American
plots and maneuvers.

Press freedom and democracy

A free press ranks among the most critical institutions
of liberal democracy. Among the reforms introduced
by Mikhail Gorbachev in his campaign to modernize
the Soviet system, glasnost, or openness, played the
most important role in challenging the decades-old
system of Soviet totalitarianism. Something similar
can be said of press freedom initiatives in other new
democracies during the latter part of the 20th century,

“If the 20th century was defined by
the battle for freedom of information
and against censorship, the 21st
century will be defined by malevo-
lent actors, states or corporations,
abusing the right to freedom of
information for quite other ends.”

—Vasily Gatov, media analyst

“Information wars have already
become standard practice and the
main type of warfare. The bombers
are now sent in after the information
campaign.”

—Dmitry Kiselyov, chief Russian propaganda strategist

particularly in postcommunist societies where strict
press censorship had prevailed for years. Even if the
professionalism and ethical standards of journalism
in those countries were not always up to the highest
levels, the fact that the press spoke with different
voices, different opinions, and even different biases
was a huge step toward a world in which democracy
was the norm.

Authoritarians push back

lt is precisely because of press freedom’s central
importance to democracy that the new generation of
authoritarian leaders has made its annihilation a top
priority. However, modern authoritarians recognize
that the methods of the print and analog broadcast
era—prepublication censorship and stilted, formula-
ic propaganda—were no longer viable in the age of
digital media and globalization.

At a minimum, governments that sought involvement
in the world economy found it advisable to tolerate a
measure of openness about budgets, economic data,
and those aspects of social life that are critical for
international business. Authoritarian leaders thus face
the dilemma of retaining domination over the political
story while permitting a degree of accurate informa-
tion about economic affairs.

www.freedomhouse.org

15

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019249
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013204.txt,"HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013204
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026450.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 8/18/2017 8:09:23 PM 
To: Michael Wolff 
Subject: Re: 
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Michael Wolff <____________________________> wrote: 
Just spent two hours on the phone with Bannon. I saw Spicer and Priebus his week. I'd pretty much say that 
nearly 100% of the non-family senior staff of the first six months now believe that Trump can't function in this 
job. I think they all become part of a Republican initiative to take him down. I hear Kelly trying to make 
Trump understand that Jared and Ivanka have to go. 
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:58 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I assume no dinner 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026450 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011873.txt,"/ BARAK / 116

the beginning summed up the feeling of most of the country at the end: “If you
don’t win, you lose... Hizbollah survived. It won the war.”

Without the botched handling of the war, I might well have remained a mere
member of the Labor Party and a private citizen. But when the commission of
inquiry released its report in April 2007, three people were singled out: Olmert,
Amir Peretz and Halutz. Olmert was portrayed as a military novice who’d gone
into battle without understanding the wartime role and responsibilities of a Prime
Minister. Halutz’s “excess of charisma” was held responsible for keeping
ministers, and military officers as well, from questioning his judgement or pressing
him for alternatives. Amir Peretz was found to be the wrong man in the wrong
cabinet post at the wrong time. Of the three, only Halutz seemed ready to take
personal responsibility. Even before the report came out, he resigned. Olmert and
Peretz were determined to stay put, despite calls to quit not just from the
opposition but from Tzipi Livni. Inside Labor as well, the war produced a clamor
for change. When a vote for party chairman was held in June 2007, I was chosen to
return in Peretz’s place.

Within days, I replaced him as Defense Minister as well. Yet the main item in
my in-box would no longer be Lebanon. I had been briefed a few weeks earlier by
Olmert on a threat hundreds of miles further away: a construction site in northeast
Syria, along the Euphrates River, where Mossad had uncovered evidence that the
Syrians, with technical help from North Korea and funding from Iran, were
building a nuclear reactor.

I had got to know Olmert fairly well over the years, initially when I was in the
kirya and both he and another rising Likud politician to whom I became closer,
Dan Meridor, were members of the Knesset’s defense committee. But from the day
I returned to the Israeli government in June 2007, there was growing tension
between us over dealing with the Syrian nuclear threat. It was not about whether
we should take military action to destroy the reactor, before the fuel rods arrived
on site and it could begin producing bomb-ready material. Just as under Menachem
Begin in 1981, when we’d launched our preemptive strike on Saddam Hussein’s

402
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011873
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032851.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2/10/2016 7:17:33 PM 
To: Thomas Jr., Landon 
Subject: Re: Trump 
But by being a phony rich person 
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016, Thomas Jr., Landon wrote: 
Actually I don't think he/voters would care. Being effectively shameless is a pretty powerful weapon 
for a presidential candidate. 
http://www.vox.com/2016/2/10/m956978/donald-trump-terrifying 
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Wow 
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016, Thomas Jr., Landon 
Its getting scary. The stories you could tell... 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
wrote: 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/inde  
x.html  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032851 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
I 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.  
html  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032852 
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022073.txt,"that he recovered. And though it to

James PATTERSON

ok him three years, working
with Robert Gold and the US attorney's office, Epstein finally did
make his way to the center of DGS'’s maze and recover Obregon's

money.

Most of it was being held in a bank in the Cayman Islands.
ement with Ana prevents us from knowing
d how much he kept. But given the

earned millions—or more—
hing but appreciation for

Epstein’s agre
how much he recovered—an
amounts at stake, Epstein likely
and to this day Ana Obregon has not

what Epstein accomplished.

“1 know he’s had some problems,” she says. “J don’t want any-

thing to do with that.”
As for Epstein, he came out 0

andi: from now on, he'd only work with the super rich.

oper

f the deal with a new modus,

ia

Eva Andersson:

iss Swede
zling whi
: the stage
_ winner of this, the
: Seoul, South Korea
; “And now that
pee which five girls
4 Barker pauses,
tightens. There are |
even if they’re not
| “On this card
eceived the highe:
fe lew, the swin
4 a feels the c:
nding in betwee

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022073
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013210.txt,"294 16 AGI Preschool

Type of Capability Specific Skills to be Evaluated
Logical-
Mathematical « Catesorzing
e Sorting
e Arithmetic
e Performing simple “proto-scientific experiments”

Nonverbal Commu-

nication i oven :
Communicating via gesture

Dramatizing situations
Dramatizing needs, wants
Express empathy

Spatial- Visual

e Visual patterning
e@ Self-expression through drawing
e Navigate

Objective

Assembling objects
Disassembling objects
Measurement
Symmetry

Similarity between structures (e.g. block structures and
real ones)

Table 16.2: Categories of Preschool Curriculum, Part 2

Type of Capability Specific Skills to be Evaluated
Interpersonal
@ Cooperation
e Display appropriate behavior in various settings
e Clean up belongings
e Share supplies

Emotional

e Delay gratification
@ Control emotional reactions
e Complete projects

Table 16.3: Categories of Preschool Curriculum, Part 3

environments (the learning centers) into a single room, and to present a variety of different tasks
in each environment. The environments constituted by preschool learning centers are designed
as microcosms of the most important aspects of the environments faced by humans in their
everyday lives.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013210
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026444.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 5/23/2017 6:46:27 PM 
To: Leon Black 
Weingarten, a high-powered attorney at Steptoe & Johnson in Washington known for his folksy style, is a 
somewhat unlikely choice because he has represented Democratic clients and is close friends with Eric H. 
Holder Jr., who served as attorney general under President Barack Obama. Holder and Weingarten met during 
their early years at the Justice Department. 
The four finalists did not respond to requests for comment. A White House official said the administration had 
no comment 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026444 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011867.txt,"/ BARAK / 110

any business involvement that could present a conflict of interest now that I had
left. Frankly, I saw nothing wrong with earning money through honest endeavor,
and using the proceeds to provide economic security for myself and my family,
and to give our grandchildren a better start in life than Nava’s or my own parents
had been able to do.

In the end, we didn’t move to Kfar Shmaryahu. But that was because of an even
more profound change in my life: I separated from Nava, after more than 30 years
together. When we had begun plans to move, I laughed off a warning from a
psychologist friend of mine that decisions like building a new house could lead to a
deeper reassessment of your life. But that is at least in part what happened. There
were also other changes that caused me to stop and take stock. I was no longer
Prime Minister. My father had passed away soon after I left office. Professionally,
I was exploring new areas and developing new interests. Nava and I had been
happily married since our twenties. We had three wonderful daughters, and a first
grandchild. Yet the more I thought about where we were in our lives, the more I
felt our future paths were pulling us in different directions. For both of us, the
separation was difficult, though it was made a bit less painful because Nava knew
that it had nothing to do with another woman, or another relationship. I did
imagine that I might one day meet someone else. But I was equally prepared for it
not happening. I certainly didn’t expect it any time soon.

When it did, it began by accident. A few weeks after our separation, I was
visiting the Knesset for a discussion about fixing Israel’s broken electoral system.
In the audience was a member of one of the civic associations pressing for reform:
Nili Priell, my first, and only, serious girlfriend before I met Nava. We spoke for a
few minutes afterwards. We agreed to meet again, and catch up with each other’s
lives, a week or so later. Both of us now had grown children. We were both on our
own. There is, I assume for everyone, something impossible to replicate about a
first love. Nili and I were given an unlikely second chance. That seemed to me an
extraordinary gift. It still does.

Yet if my personal life seemed full of new promise, the same could not be said
of the country I’d served for my whole adult life, or of the political party I'd led
into government. The continuing construction of the security fence along the West
Bank finally did begin to reduce the sheer number of Palestinian attacks: from
nearly 50 in 2002, to about half that number in 2003. But the suicide bombers who
did get through — from Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fatah’s “Al-Aqsa Martyrs’

396
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011867
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032689.txt,"From: Stephen Hanso 
Sent: 1/3/2018 6:55:08 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
Dam. That will be a interesting book 
Sent from my iPad 
On Jan 3, 2018, at 1:08 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032689 
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016527.txt,"Page 18 of 42
103 Minn. L. Rev. 844, *879

[*880]
4. Oversight of Declination Decisions in State Justice Systems

State justice systems do not go as far as the federal system does, much less provide the kind of oversight or victim recourse
that European systems now offer. And this is so despite the fact that all states have adopted substantial victims' bills of rights,
nearly all of which include rights for victims to consult with prosecutors. Most make clear that the consultation right attaches
only after the prosecutor decides to file charges. !*° Rights of administrative review are rare. !*! One reason for that is surely
structural. The U.S. Department of Justice is a hierarchically organized agency within which all federal prosecutors operate, a
structure that enables supervisory and quasi-independent review within the agency. But few states follow that model. Instead,
prosecutors in most states are locally elected and operate [*881] autonomously from state justice departments or attorneys
general, which generally exercise little, if any, oversight. !?? Administrative review of state prosecutors! charging decisions is
simply not feasible without major reorganization of state justice systems.

That structural barrier probably explains why state prosecutors’ decisions are functionally immune to administrative oversight,
but the lack of judicial oversight has a different origin. In accord with common law tradition, state and federal courts have
never meaningfully reviewed public prosecutors’ noncharging decisions. !73 In particular, they have unambiguously rejected
victims' claims of standing to challenge those decisions. '24 A few [*882] limited exceptions prove the rule. In cases of
private criminal complaints filed by alleged victims, Colorado, Michigan, Nebraska, and Pennsylvania authorize judges to
review public prosecutors' decisions not to charge. !?> Even when statutes grant courts the power to review (or even mandate
review) of charging and dismissal decisions, state judges consistently have refused to scrutinize the merits of prosecutors'
judgments. Many states have replaced the common law rule that gave prosecutors complete discretion to nolle prosequi (or
dismiss) any criminal charge with statutes that require judges to confirm that non-prosecution is in the interest of justice. 17°
Yet courts uniformly refuse to engage in meaningful review, inferring instead that those statutes require deference to

prosecutors. 12)

84 See Erikson v. Pawnee Cty. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs, 263 F.3d 1151, 1154 (10th Cir. 2001) (finding no due process violation because private
attorney assisting prosecution did not ""control[] critical prosecutorial decisions""). The first states to prohibit privately funded prosecutors
even under supervision of public prosecutors were Massachusetts, Michigan, and Wisconsin. See Commonwealth v. Gibbs, 70 Mass. (4 Gray)
146, 147-48 (1855); Meister v. People, 31 Mich. 99, 104-06 (1875); Biemel v. State, 37 N.W.244, 248-49 (Wis. 1888). See also Ireland,
supra note 83, at 49 (listing fifteen states that still approved privately funded prosecutors in 1900). Other states abolished this practice more
recently. See State ex rel. Wild v. Otis, 257 N.W.2d 361, 365 (Minn. 1977) (holding that party has no right of private prosecution); State v.
Harrington, 534 SW.2d 44, 48 (Mo. 1976) (holding that a right of private prosecution should not be permitted); People v. Calderone, 573
N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1007 (N.Y. City Crim. Ct. 1991) (concluding that under New York law private prosecutions by interested parties or their
attorneys present inherent conflicts of interest which violate defendants' due process rights); State v. Best, 186 S.E.2d 1, 4 (N.C. 1972) (noting
that a public prosecutor must be in charge of all prosecutions).

8 See, e.g., N.J. Ct. R. 3:23-9 (permitting private prosecutor with approval of the public prosecutor and court); N.J. Ct. R. 7:8-7(b)
(permitting private prosecutor for cross-complaints with court approval); State v. Harton, 296 S.E.2d 112, 113 (Ga. 1982) (private party not
allowed to prosecute without state approval); State v. Moose, 313 S.E.2d 507, 512-13 (N.C. 1984) (stating that private attorneys may assist
public solicitors where public solicitors retain control and management of prosecution); Cantrell, 329 S.E.2d at 25 (stating that private
attorneys may assist commonwealth attorneys with the permission of the prosecutor and the court); 63C Am. Jur. 2d Prosecuting Attorneys §
J2 (2018) (citing authority in some states that private attorneys may assist public prosecutors). For a state statute that apparently gives the
""prosecuting witness"" a right to pay a private attorney to assist the public prosecutor without the latter's consent, see Kan. Stat. Ann. § 19-717
(2017); see also John D. Bessler, The Public Interest and the Unconstitutionality of Private Prosecutors, 47 Ark. IL. Rev. 51], 529, nn.71-72
(1994) (citing cases in majority of states allowing private prosecutors to assist in public prosecutions). Bessler identifies three states that
""allow private prosecutors to participate without the consent or supervision of the district attorney,"" but in all three states, the public
prosecutor initiated and litigated the criminal charge, while the private prosecutor assisted in the litigation as counsel to a victim. Jd. at 529
7.

86 234 Pa. Code § 506 (2001); In_re Private Criminal Complaints of Rafferty, 969 A.2d 578, 582 (Pa. 2009) (discussing the ability of a
prosecutor to approve or disapprove of private complaints). Judges may authorize private counsel to take over as prosecutor upon finding that
a district attorney has ""neglected or refuseed to prosecute"" a properly grounded charge. See 16 Pa. Stat. and Cons. Stat. Ann. § 1409 (West

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016527
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030836.txt,"* AQGVErTIsEe

* Contact Us

Sudoku
Horoscopes
Archives

Articles Collection
Public Notices
Buy Back Issues
Buy Reprints

Buy Photos

Buy Tickets
Work at Sun Sentinel
Sell Our Paper

Newspaper Boxes
Teacher Resources

About Our Ads
Advertising Policy
Advertise With Us
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Comments

oo oO 0 oO O09 0 0 oO oO oO oO oO Dee lolol

« Sun Sentinel, 500 E. Broward Blvd., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394

Winner of the 2013 Pulitzer Prize Gold Medal in Public Service

A Tribune Newspaper website

<div> <img sre=""//secure-us.imrworldwide.com/cgi-bin/m?ci=us-400338h&amp;cg=—0&amp;cc=1 &amp;ts=noscript” width=""1"" height=""1""

<

>

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030836
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024768.txt,"ACKRELL
CAPITAL

Cannabis Investment Report | December 2017

Comparison of Canadian Stock Markets

Similar to stock markets in the United States, Canadian stock markets vary significantly in terms
of their financial, liquidity and corporate governance requirements. Most Canadian publicly traded
cannabis-related companies trade on the CSE due to its less stringent requirements, as compared to the
TSX and TSXV. More than 10% of the companies traded on the CSE are cannabis-related companies.
The following chart provides a comparison of the TSX, TSXV and CSE.

Canadian Stock Market Comparison

Toronto Stock Exchange TSX Venture Exchange Canadian Securities Exchange
(TSX) (TSXV) (CSE)
337

Number of Total 1487 1791
c Listed Cannabis- 6 70 a
ompanies ralated
Market Total ($U.S.) $2.0 trillion $33.7 billion $6.2 billion
1
Value"" Median ($US.) $282.6 million $5.0 milion $6.1 million
Must meet financial and liquidity Must meet financial and liquidity Must meet financial and liquidity
criteria determined by a company’s criteria determined by a criteria determined by a
_ industry.Criteria include: company’s industry.Criteria company’s industry and whether
Listing or Earnings, Revenue, Cash Flow, include: Net Tangible Assets, the company is an operating
Trading Net Tangible Assets, Adequate Revenue, Adequate Working company. Criteria include:
Requirements Working Capital, Cash, Market Capital, Property, Operating Revenue, Assets, Amount of
Capitalization, Amount of Publicly History, Amount of Publicly Publicly Held Shares and
Held Shares and Number of Held Shares and Number of Number of Shareholders.
Shareholders. Shareholders.
Corporate * Annual audit + Annual audit ¢ Annual audit
Governance + Audit committee + Audit committee + Audit committee
Requirements * Two independent directors * Two independent directors
Reporting Required to file quarterly Required to file quarterly Required to file quarterly
Requirements and annual reports and annual reports and annual reports
‘Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence
132 © 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024768
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027628.txt,"GUID: 261 F58FA-151D-4056-A513-7957AE19F324

Message: ?

sender: iy

Time: 03/29/19 01:57:08 AM (575542628)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: O038B2E85-F2E1-4001-8370-927009A5D59B

Message: Is it possible to get your plane here to collect me

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/29/19 01:57:48 AM (575542668)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 31DA7/764B-3AFE-468D-BD2A-83C055

r

i2E42A

Message: Where are you

Time: 03/29/19 01:58:23 AM (575542703)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 87C174BE-ADOB-416A-B68F-CFFEF3E42516

r,

Message: Rome

Sender:

Time: 03/29/19 01:58:36 AM (575542716)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 95798BE5-9F00-4A3F-8D18-038DF5598B04

Message: Waived off Spain

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/29/19 01:58:57 AM (575542737)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 49E3C859-1764-4435-9294-04217383CF08

Message: When?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027628
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026536.txt,"[29] P. E. Tetlock, Trends in cognitive sciences 7, 320 (2003).

[30] R. H. Frank, Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. (WW Norton
& Co, 1988).

[31] P. Ekman, E. R. Sorenson, W. V. Friesen, Science 164, 86 (1969).

[32] P. Ekman, R. J. Davidson, W. V. Friesen, Journal of personality and social psychology
58, 342 (1990).

[33] L. I. Reed, K. N. Zeglen, K. L. Schmidt, Evolution and Human Behavior 33, 200
(2012).

16

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026536
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015228.txt,"The leadoff speaker at Conspiracy Con was Cathy O’ Brien, who
claimed to be a victim of the CIA’ s MK-Ultra child-sex-slave program,
Project Monarch. She was introduced by her husband, Mark Phillips, as

“the love of my life.” Phillips claims that, having worked for the CIA,
where he learned hypnosis, and for a Department of Defense
subcontractor with exposure to mind-control research, he was able to
rescue O' Brien, deprogram her and collaborate on their book, 7rance
Formation of America.

“There is not one person in this audience,” he exhorts, “that
could not be legally experimented on, killed or financially destroyed.”

He has the bearing, the cadence and the pompadour of a
dramatically pious televangelist. He oozes with practiced integrity. In
contrast, Cathy O’ Brien has the demeanor of a guileless, bleached-blond
checkout cashier in a small-town supermarket who sends money every
week to her favorite televangelist. She speaks with a certain tremor in her
voice.

“Mind control,” she warns, “is the most important issue facing
humanity today.”

She reveals her relationship with Gerald Ford, who was “very much

interested in mind control, so the local Michigan Mafia child pornography

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015228
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020664.txt,"Mishcon de Reya

All of the above information was in the public domain at the time you published the Article.
Your conduct

Your conduct has been disgraceful. You published the Article without making any effort to
seek our client's comment. Further, you took the story from an article in The New York Daily
News, yet chose to ignore our client's position contained therein. You also deliberately
embellished upon the story in The New York Daily News: nowhere in that article does it state
either that claimed that she had sex with our client, or that she did have sex
with him. In fact, quite the opposite, it states as follows: ""Nowhere in the court case or the
transcript does Ransome or anyone else allege that had sex with Dershowitz — or that she
was directed to.""

It is staggering that a news organisation as well-resourced and with such a good reputation
as yours has conducted itself in this way.

Serious harm

Given the gravity of the Allegations — which include imputations of seriously improper
and/or unlawful behaviour — as well as the nature and extent of publication, there is no
question that serious harm has been, and will continue to be, caused to our client's
reputation.

The serious harm you have caused to our client's reputation is not only causing him (and his
family) great anguish, it is likely to cause significant damage to his ability to earn in the future.
He will hold you fully liable for this.

Immediate action required

In view of the above, our client requires you to immediately do the following:

I. Remove the Article from your website.

2. Publish an apology, the terms of which to be agreed.

3 Remove any associated links to the Article within your website.

4. Undertake not to repeat the Allegations.

5. Undertake to pay our client significant damages, the quantum of which to be
agreed.

6. Undertake to pay our client his legal costs.

Please may we hear from you within 24 hours. In the meantime, all our client's rights are
reserved.

51150637.2 3

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020664
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.txt,"Page 4 of 78
2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *866

The Crime Victims' Rights Movement was also able to prod the federal system to recognize victims’ rights. In 1982, Congress
passed the first federal victims’ rights legislation, the Victim and Witness Protection Act, which gave victims the right to make
an impact statement at sentencing and provided expanded restitution. !4 Since then, Congress has passed several acts that
further protected victims’ rights, including the Victims of Crime Act of 1984, '> the Victims’ Rights and Restitution Act of
1990, 1° the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, !7 the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
of 1996, '® and the Victim Rights Clarification Act of 1997. !° Other federal statutes have been passed to deal with
specialized victim situations, such as child victims and witnesses. 7°

Among these, the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act of 1990 is worth briefly highlighting. This act purported to create a
comprehensive list of victim's rights in the federal criminal justice process. The act commanded that ""[a] crime victim has the

n 21

following rights and then listed various rights in the process. Among the [*867] rights were the right to ""be treated with

fairness and with respect for the victims’ dignity and privacy,"" 7? to ""be notified of court proceedings,"" 7 to ""confer with [the]

attorney for the Government in the case,"" 7+

and to attend court proceedings, even if called as a witness, unless the victim's
testimony ""would be materially affected"" by hearing other testimony at trial. 75 The statute also directed the Justice
Department to make its ""best efforts"" to ensure that victims received their rights. 7° Yet this act never successfully integrated
victims into the federal criminal justice process and was generally regarded as something of a dead letter. Because Congress

passed the CVRA in 2004 to remedy the problems with this law, it is worth briefly reviewing why it was largely unsuccessful.

Curiously, the Victims’ Rights Act was codified in Title 42 of the United States Code - the title dealing with ""Public Health and
Welfare."" As a result, the statute was generally unknown to federal judges and criminal law practitioners. Federal practitioners
reflexively consult Title 18 for guidance on criminal law issues. More prosaically, federal criminal enactments are bound
together in a single West publication - the Federal Criminal Code and Rules. This single publication is carried to court by
prosecutors and defense attorneys and is on the desk of most federal judges. Because West Publishing never included the
Victims’ Rights Act in this book, the statute was essentially unknown even to the most experienced judges and attorneys. The
prime illustration of the ineffectiveness of the Victims’ Rights Act comes from the Oklahoma City bombing case, where victims
were denied rights protected by statute in large part because the rights were not listed in the criminal rules. 77

Because of such problems with the statutory protection of victims' rights, victims advocates decided in 1995 the time was right
to press for a federal constitutional amendment. They argued that the statutory protections could not sufficiently guarantee

4 Pub. L. No. 97-291, 96 Stat. 1248 (1982).

> Pub. L. No. 98-473, 98 Stat. 2170 (1984).

© Pub. L. No. 101-647, 104 Stat. 4826 (1990).
7 Pub. L. No. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796 (1994).
8 Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996).

° Pub. L. No. 105-6, 171 Stat. 12 (1997).

20 See, e.g., /8 U.S.C. § 3509 (2006) (protecting rights of child victim-witnesses).
21 Pub. L. No. 101-647, § 502(b) (1996).

2 Id. § 502(b)(1).

3 Id. § 502(b)(3).

24 Id. § 502(b)(5).

25 Id. § 502(b)(4).

26 Id. § 502(a).

27 United States v. McVeigh, 157 F.3d 809, 814-815 (10th Cir. 1998). See generally Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates, supra note 6, at 515-22
(discussing this case in greater detail).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023724.txt,"Forthcoming (August 2011) Future Science edited by Max Brockman, Vintage Press, New York.

“best choice” fish increased an average of 29 percent per week, sales of yellow-tagged “proceed
with caution” seafood declined an average of 27 percent per week, but the sales of the red-tagged
“worst choice” seafood—i.e., the heavily overfished species—remained the same.’ Between
1980 and 2008, sales of pesticides increased 36 percent in the state of California, the birthing
ground of the organic food eco-label.* Despite sporadic instances of such measures as car-
pooling and use of cloth grocery bags in lieu of plastic-or-paper, the demand for oil in the U.S.
has grown 30 percent overall and 5 percent per capita since 1990.’ The positive effect of
idealistic consumers does exist, but it is masked by the growing demand and numbers of other
consumers.

Guilt is a valuable emotion, but it is felt by individuals and therefore motivates only
individuals. Another drawback is that guilt is triggered by an existing value within an individual.
If the value does not exist, there is no guilt and hence no action (e.g., sales for red “worst choice”
seafood remained the same). What if the aim were to promote a value felt by the group but not
necessarily by every individual in the group? Many problems, like most concerning the
environment, are group problems. Perhaps to solve these problems we need a group emotion.
Maybe we need shame.

Shaming, as noted, is unwelcome in regulating personal conduct that does not harm
others. But what about shaming conduct that does harm others? The U.S. National Sex Offender
Registry provides an online database with the names, photographs, and addresses of sex

offenders in every state. In March 2010, Nebraska lawmakers approved a bill that allows the

7E. Hallstein & S. B. Villas-Boas, “Are consumers color blind? An empirical investigation of a traffic light advisory
for sustainable seafood,” http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/29v6wS5sp#page-11 (2009)

* Based on data available from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation.

° This is calculated from DOE statistics. U.S. oil consumption in 1990 was 17 million barrels per day and 22.2
million barrels per day in 2010.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023724
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025476.txt,"Flags: 1085445

Is Read:

No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 5SE350A54-1F18-4ADA-A273-74C409088B51

Message:

do you have for a coffee or meal with our girl

Sender: 7

Time: 05/16/19 02:06:14 PM (579733574)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read:

Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 767C657A-3D79-4220-B60F-D

Message:

Sender:

L,

17 7F3D3659

Would love to either she is in town

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 02:07:11 PM (579733631)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read:

No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: C01C417D-3F29-4805-893C-64986E853612

Message:

yes she's agreed

Sender:

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 02:07:30 PM (579733650)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read:

No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 575DE98C-7962-46D1-A538-40931D456790

Message:

not only do idofandb =, but now a matchmaker

Sender:

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 02:20:32 PM (579734432)

Flags: 1085445

ITs Read:

No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 1A15CDO9-197F-42F7-B693-13851FDEAD42

Message:

Its like Bogart and Hepburn on the African queen

Sender:

:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/16/19 02:21:09 PM (579734469)

Flags: 1150981

Is Read:

No

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025476
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014888.txt,"Table 1: Key 1Q metrics

for Large Cap Internet (>$5bn Market Cap)

Company Ticker

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global

Table 2: Key 1Q metrics

Key 1Q Metric
Website revenue (ex-FX) growth vs 22.3% in 4Q
AWS revenue growth vs. 47% in 4Q
US GMV growth trends
Room night growth vs. 15% in 4Q

Ad revenue growth (ex-FX) vs. 54% reported in 4Q

1Q Intl sub guidance
1Q room night growth vs. 31% in $Q
Global DAU's vs. 158mn in 4Q
Update on ad spend targets, 2017 guidance
MAUs and y/y trend vs 319mn (+4% y/y) in 4Q
(Any update on acquisition timing and ongoing breach investigations

Mortgage Revenue

Research estimates

for Small Cap Internet (<$5bn Market Cap)

BofAML Estimate
21.6%
43% yly
3.5% yly
16%
52%
3.9mn
26% yly
166mn
18% S&M yiy growth
322mn MAUs (+4% y/y)
NIA
$18.1mn

Company Ticker

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global

Key 1Q Metric
1Q revenue
1Q transactions
US paying families
1Q unit sales and gross margin
1Q unit sales and gross margin
Gross food sales growth

Paid Member Growth

1Q origination growth and marketplace take rate

Ad revenue per listening hour growth
Variable marketing margin growth
Qualified referral growth
2Q revenue growth guidance
Premium subscribers growth
1Q Local advertising account adds

Online Games DAUs

Research estimates

BofAML Estimate
$117mn
734mn
266,607 (4% y/y)
3mn/39%
800K/35%
26%
17%
12% 13%
10%
29% yly
56% yly
25% yly
36%
4k (17% yy)

17.9

2 Internet/e-Commerce | 06 April 2017

BankofAmerica <2”
Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014888
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023042.txt,". hm says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was
aged 15. Ms Maxwell cd upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was
naked on massage table.

Ms Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein

and directed [ll to copy her.
Please respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.

2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant Po
and Mr Epstein.

3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed rior to sex
sessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.

4. a was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other
men.

5, RE was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les
Wexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn.

6. Ms Maxwell introduced to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where [il
had sex with him. subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms
Maxwell directed to sit on Andrew's knee with |. Andrew groped both girls. Ms
Maxwell directed after this to have sex with Andrew.

Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with IJ to Little St James where she was directed
to stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on
them.
7. a es paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters.
8. Ms Maxwell knew f age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew.
9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade i to bear his child.

10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein
would ask explicit questions about what went on.

11. Mr Epstein’s residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and
taped , | even in the bathroom.

12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's
Palm Beach house.

13. Ms Maxwell piloted President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two brunettes
Ms Maxwell, a and Mr Epstein were at the table.

14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes.

------ End of Forwarded Message

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023042
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt,"From: Robert Kuhn [i

Sent: 5/11/2017 5:38:37 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Kuhn

Importance: — High

Ruminating (in Betjing traffic) on plant biology and ways to structure possible Closer To Truth (CTT) series to
portray your sense and insights.

For plant biology per se, there’s probably three strong episodes, with higher production values needed to
illustrate ideas/principles (more than the usual CTT talking heads). To fit the CTT framework (and audience
expectation), these fascinating discoveries or hints of complex, multifarious mechanisms would need to be
explored (even if not yet understood) in terms of simple, fundamental principles (applicable across disciplines -
so-called ‘general systems theory’).

This potential series on plant biology could be extended to 5-6 episodes by including medicinals - plant
derivatives that are, for some conditions, best treatments for numerous diseases. This could include, for
example, a critical look at Chinese medicine.

I think, though, there is a bigger idea lurking here. Your unique ways of thinking, exemplified by plant biology,
encourages another, larger possibility for a significant CTT series. Each of the topics you’ve brought up, and
many of your past fundings, sought kinds of breakthroughs or radically new ways of approaching reality and the
knowledge and manipulation of reality. So, how about producing a big CTT series on just that - ""Radical
Breakthroughs”?

I can imagine CTT episodes on each of the following kinds of topics you’ve mentioned, in which radical
breakthroughs or deep structural significance are being appreciated:

- Plant Biology

- Deception (biology)

- Power Laws (""found everywhere in nature, Pareto, law of large numbers”’)
- New Math (""category theory, membrane computing, as a new tool for cognition”)

- Mathematics and Truth
- Music (""a tool to interogate the brain, not a product of but a lense into the inner software”)

- Dreams (""always on, consciousness blocking access, schizo have sleep disorders’’)
- Power (nature,as you said, ""financial, physical, intellectual, ability to do things in a local space"")

I’m sure there are other such categories of ‘radical breakthrough’ - for example, several wild ideas in
neuroscience, such as levels of information from sub-cellular to massive circuitry.

We would clearly unify the topics and episodes with an overarching thematic vision of “radical breakthroughs”
that “challenge conventional wisdom” (this phrase was an early Closer To Truth subtitle).

Several of these topics can have more than one episode. We can easily produce 13 high-quality episodes and
thus have a coherent full season on “Radical Breakthroughs"", which would be distributed and marketed as such.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032527.txt,"From: Weingarten, Reid

Sent: 4/29/2017 6:56:25 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: Re:

Importance: — High

2-3 weeks but Not sure how it will roll....supposed to be serious riots here may 1....lefties are pissed and trump said p.r.
can fuck iself....what’s with you?

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:46 PM

To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

for how long. youcan hop to my island with your friend if you like, just give me 24 hrs notice otherwsie 1 ill
be htre around the 19th

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Weingarten, Reid Po wrote:

San juan...pick the jury monday

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@qmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 2:44 PM

To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject:

where are you/ PR or new york

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032527
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031296.txt,"Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

5/5 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

tel

m  £i&

ey

On Nov 16, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Steven Pfeiffer <a

wrote:

Hi Jeffrey —

Sounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, |
can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.

COMPANY NAME (if applicable):
CONTACT NAME:
ADDRESS LINE 1:
ADDRESS LINE 2:

Many thanks.

Best,
Steven

Steven Pfeiffer
Associate Director, Development
Independent Filmmaker Project

Made in NY Media Center by IFP
30 John Street

Brooklyn, NY 11201

p4

www. ifp.org

<image001.png>

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031296
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014650.txt,"LPF&S or an affiliate was a manager of a public offering of securities of this issuer within the last 12 months: Aetna Inc, Consolidated Edison, Dover Corp, General Dynamics, Hess, MGM
Resorts, Norfolk Southern, Texas Instrument.
The issuer is or was, within the last 12 months, an investment banking client of MLPF&S and/or one or more of its affiliates: Aetna Inc, Consolidated Edison, Dover Corp, General Dynamics, Hess,
GM Resorts, Norfolk Southern, Texas Instrument.
LPF&S or an affiliate has received compensation from the issuer for non-investment banking services or products within the past 12 months: Aetna Inc, Consolidated Edison, Dover Corp,
General Dynamics, Hess, MGM Resorts, Norfolk Southern, SVB Financial, Texas Instrument, TripAdvisor.
The issuer is or was, within the last 12 months, a non-securities business client of MLPF&S and/or one or more of its affiliates: Aetna Inc, Consolidated Edison, Dover Corp, General Dynamics,
Hess, MGM Resorts, Norfolk Southern, SVB Financial, Texas Instrument, TripAdvisor.
LPF&S or an affiliate has received compensation for investment banking services from this issuer within the past 12 months: Aetna Inc, Consolidated Edison, Dover Corp, General Dynamics,
Hess, MGM Resorts, Norfolk Southern, Texas Instrument.
LPF&S or an affiliate expects to receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking services from this issuer or an affiliate of the issuer within the next three months: Aetna Inc,
Dover Corp, General Dynamics, Hess, MGM Resorts, Norfolk Southern, Texas Instrument.
LPF&S together with its affiliates beneficially owns one percent or more of the common stock of this issuer. If this report was issued on or after the 9th day of the month, it reflects the
ownership position on the last day of the previous month. Reports issued before the 9th day of a month reflect the ownership position at the end of the second month preceding the date of
he report: Dover Corp, General Dynamics, Hess, Norfolk Southern, SVB Financial, Texas Instrument.
LPF&S or one of its affiliates is willing to sell to, or buy from, clients the common equity of the issuer ona principal basis: Aetna Inc, Consolidated Edison, Dover Corp, General Dynamics, Hess,
GM Resorts, Norfolk Southern, SVB Financial, Texas Instrument, TripAdvisor.
he issuer is or was, within the last 12 months, a securities business client (non-investment banking) of MLPF&S and/or one or more of its affiliates: Aetna Inc, Consolidated Edison, Dover Corp,
General Dynamics, Hess, MGM Resorts, Norfolk Southern, SVB Financial, Texas Instrument, TripAdvisor.
BofA Merrill Lynch Research Personnel (including the analyst(s) responsible for this report) receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall profitability of Bank of America
Corporation, including profits derived from investment banking. The analyst(s) responsible for this report may also receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall
profitability of the Bank’s sales and trading businesses relating to the class of securities or financial instruments for which such analyst is responsible.

U

Other Important Disclosures

From time to time research analysts conduct site visits of covered issuers. BofA Merrill Lynch policies prohibit research analysts from accepting payment or reimbursement for travel expenses
from the issuer for such visits.
Prices are indicative and for information purposes only. Except as otherwise stated in the report, for the purpose of any recommendation in relation to: (i) an equity security, the price
referenced is the publicly traded price of the security as of close of business on the day prior to the date of the report or, if the report is published during intraday trading, the price referenced is
indicative of the traded price as of the date and time of the report; or (ii) a debt security (including equity preferred and CDS), prices are indicative as of the date and time of the report and are
from various sources including Bank of America Merrill Lynch trading desks.
The date and time of completion of the production of any recommendation in this report shall be the date and time of dissemination of this report as recorded in the report timestamp.

Officers of MLPF&S or one or more of its affiliates (other than research analysts} may have a financial interest in securities of the issuer(s) or in related investments.

BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.

""BofA Merrill Lynch"" includes Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (""MLPF&S’) and its affiliates. Investors should contact their BofA Merrill Lynch representative or
Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management financial advisor if they have questions concerning this report. ""BofA Merrill Lynch” and ""Merrill Lynch” are each global brands for BofA
Merrill Lynch Global Research.
Information relating to Non-US affiliates of BofA Merrill Lynch and Distribution of Affiliate Research Reports:

LPF&S distributes, or may in the future distribute, research reports of the following non-US affiliates in the US (short name: legal name, regulator): Merrill Lynch (South Africa): Merrill Lynch
South Africa (Pty) Ltd., regulated by The Financial Service Board; MLI (UK): Merrill Lynch International, regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority
PRA); Merrill Lynch (Australia): Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited, regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission; Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong): Merrill Lynch (Asia
Pacific) Limited, regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (HKSFC); Merrill Lynch (Singapore): Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd, regulated by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore (MAS); Merrill Lynch (Canada): Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, regulated by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada; Merrill Lynch (Mexico): Merrill Lynch Mexico, SA de
CV, Casa de Bolsa, regulated by the Comisi6n Nacional Bancaria y de Valores; Merrill Lynch (Argentina): Merrill Lynch Argentina SA, regulated by Comisién Nacional de Valores; Merrill Lynch
japan): Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co, Ltd., regulated by the Financial Services Agency; Merrill Lynch (Seoul): Merrill Lynch International Incorporated (Seoul Branch) regulated by the
Financial Supervisory Service; Merrill Lynch (Taiwan): Merrill Lynch Securities (Taiwan) Ltd., regulated by the Securities and Futures Bureau; DSP Merrill Lynch (India): DSP Merrill Lynch Limited,
regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India; PT Merrill Lynch (Indonesia): PT Merrill Lynch Indonesia, regulated by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK); Merrill Lynch (Israel): Merrill Lynch
srael Limited, regulated by Israel Securities Authority; Merrill Lynch (Russia): OOO Merrill Lynch Securities, Moscow, regulated by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation; Merrill Lynch
DIFC}: Merrill Lynch International (DIFC Branch), regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA); Merrill Lynch (Spain): Merrill Lynch Capital Markets Espana, S.A.S.V., regulated by
Comisién Nacional del Mercado De Valores; Merrill Lynch (Brazil}: Bank of America Merrill Lynch Banco Multiplo S.A., regulated by Comissao de Valores Mobiliarios; Merrill Lynch KSA Company,
errill Lynch Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Company, regulated by the Capital Market Authority.
This research report: has been approved for publication and is distributed in the United Kingdom (UK) to professional clients and eligible counterparties (as each is defined in the rules of the
FCA and the PRA) by MLI (UK) and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, which are authorized by the PRA and regulated by the FCA and the PRA, and is distributed in the UK to
retail clients (as defined in the rules of the FCA and the PRA) by Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited, London Branch, which is authorized by the Central Bank of Ireland and subject to
imited regulation by the FCA and PRA - details about the extent of our regulation by the FCA and PRA are available from us on request; has been considered and distributed in Japan by Merrill
Lynch (Japan), a registered securities dealer under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in Japan; is issued and distributed in Hong Kong by Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong) which is regulated
by HKSFC (research reports containing any information in relation to, or advice on, futures contracts are not intended for issuance or distribution in Hong Kong and are not directed to, or
intended for issuance or distribution to, or use by, any person in Hong Kong): is issued and distributed in Taiwan by Merrill Lynch (Taiwan); is issued and distributed in India by DSP Merrill Lynch
India}; and is issued and distributed in Singapore to institutional investors and/or accredited investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations) by Merrill Lynch International
Bank Limited (Merchant Bank} (MLIBLMB) and Merrill Lynch (Singapore) (Company Registration Nos F 06872E and 198602883D respectively). MLIBLMB and Merrill Lynch (Singapore} are
regulated by MAS. Bank of America N.A, Australian Branch (ARBN 064 874 531), AFS License 412901 (BANA Australia) and Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited (ABN 65 006 276 795), AFS
License 235132 (MLEA) distribute this report in Australia only to ‘Wholesale’ clients as defined by s.761G of the Corporations Act 2001. With the exception of BANA Australia, neither MLEA nor
any of its affiliates involved in preparing this research report is an Authorised Deposit- Taking Institution under the Banking Act 1959 nor regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation
Authority. No approval is required for publication or distribution of this report in Brazil and its local distribution is by Merrill Lynch (Brazil) in accordance with applicable regulations. Merrill Lynch
DIFQ is authorized and regulated by the DFSA. Research reports prepared and issued by Merrill Lynch (DIFC) are done so in accordance with the requirements of the DFSA conduct of business
rules. Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, Frankfurt Branch (BAMLI Frankfurt) distributes this report in Germany and is regulated by BaFin.
This research report has been prepared and issued by MLPF&S and/or one or more of its non-US affiliates. MLPF&S is the distributor of this research report in the US and accepts ful
responsibility for research reports of its non-US affiliates distributed to MLPF&S clients in the US. Any US person receiving this research report and wishing to effect any transaction in any
security discussed in the report should do so through MLPF&S and not such foreign affiliates. Hong Kong recipients of this research report should contact Merrill Lynch (Asia Pacific) Limited in
respect of any matters relating to dealing in securities (and not futures contracts) or provision of specific advice on securities (and not futures contracts). Singapore recipients of this research
report should contact Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited (Merchant Bank) and/or Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this
research report.

General Investment Related Disclosures:
Taiwan Readers: Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or a solicitation of an offer to transact in any securities or other financial instrument. No part of

Bankof America <>
Merrill Lynch Top 10 US Ideas Quarterly | 03 January 2017 29

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014650
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014219.txt,"“S* SEEL-BES-008""L

Yyseq 21j9q

‘copsuem@suiaidesiaueae .
a) Le ae 188 +9 Jaquinu Jaiy juanbay eszegat iy
EMSPPO gray voHeuUoyNy 14614 6661 -SZE-qoR}

PeUMUEL Jaquinu 281 jUaNnbasy SEPEOLZOLZ
podaay 44d! MY ezee est 008 100

SOUILy 28g

AN2W,P 80D ao1N Lodo:
$943j;002,

UIE} a Ube ed

Suajdooyay

(wo)
sue Z2P LEE LLO saquunu soy yuanbey z99/PLIS#
adoang (a) 22.182 i i pe 98z0 es O08 100

oo}saAuliseiqg “Neus Soup je}uaUNUCD
OZOl O266 11 SS 140

‘g opey ‘up ‘ossuses —

jay (uodAA) 8808-92 C16

anbay seveaizoize |S sisng (or eS tS
-WINU JAI JU
pee riZk bee 008 100 i) Scpc7ee ato

80 ‘ uBYDUnON
pee >A BAS) bag wrens oe
sqnjd JeAj4 juenbary a UMpEL piaeg

sjayory plosu0y

OZOZ/L9St 6S2-L80
Aemefy ustop
*loqulnny sesgcien SrSe def 008
4 aloe juan DOS-L9e-aL

(walgzee 162 912 SPGE-967-008
my ese) 18¢ 208 sp QOO6AOA-81 2
EPL pe HO ‘BuEjOAsI} b2O01 ANY ‘Kucy Pueps} BUS}

yodsty Aunoy eboyesnd, anuaay UZE SLGE
Avmped WSU M-SSLNG 08192 ABDID
suojdg yuby4

‘days -oadg
eeagezooe = Kvoa mnsung se58 Fey

Ao, adojaued Gags £g9 eis

bet OER)

é

(sajoued

~f8Wa) BOY Zo;
) ouloa Toh SPREE GE

“QOORP UBTY POS GZp OL 2
iepadgyelAic zor opss azp Bit
: piopoujn Auf 089 I aA ad
SIDVOW SEI LEGS BS7-8020
(ap) saquiets gris gst 6 ae
Jaquinu qnis 6446 Ud peageola
42166 622 Sb80

2826 ZZ GOS 100

SAEMIY YSHHIg
88Z9-SZZ-GOR-L

Liv

({spieg quan)

eyooy Yel S229x2960 748 179
(aaeit us) Yeinpgy

pewy €ze/G%4860. 418 148

“BY diyssaquiey 9426-162-008-1
€Sp9-26c-008-1

SSa/axy GeoLeuy

ssaidxg uBopeury

HW Opeyoiyy uesn: os Nees tle
TW Opeyaiy FOL re aay

suoog BPusiE 11S y9PS PLL Ope
1d8G 3044

juanbais vy o990-z98-008-1
OOEL eb GOB

sSonpase9 jaf
‘PUBUGET AB’
Seufify uboeliy

492-098-2Sz0
680-062-252
frajdoayayy

uasuety ay

(ar)
Jaguinu saij puanbey eperg
‘ina! Jeij juenbay pac BeEeor
= 0¢8 0¢8 628

2¥2é-L€2-008""} °

SOUBly Ay

(eaeuad) otspas (zz
YOUNZ) GOLZE PLe tL
Busee’] ouay

(I) TSAVEL

FOLZZ 28 LP OFO
1UEYa}S yt

poerEeze ly O10
qnig eayWBavog ayy

SUE Sh1-G99-Zr-Lee
Bose-ce7-eot

LOZ} puepyeaimg “BAauas)
OUBIG-VEW Np aru gh

{930} fO}sUg

ONVTHAZIIMS

zbz E42-2020
OQ swWOH ayy

2129 tre-1020
UBy Yynes

goon

93

GIUFFRE00 1665

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014219
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029090.txt,"From: Jeremy Rubin

Sent: 2/4/2017 4:18:58 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Greetings from Japan

Importance: — High

Are you around here?

@JeremyRubin

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Jeremy Rubin 4 wrote:
Feb 12th.

@JeremyRubin

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:50 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
how long will you be there?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Jeremy Rubin <g> wrote:
Hey Jeffrey,

Thought I'd check in and see what's up on your end.

- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big
bitcoiner) as FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin. And
of course, Thiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear where
your head is at on this matter.

- Last week, | presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most
interesting thing | came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are ""locked"" to
be spent only in the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An
example of something that could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you agree
to donate your money to charity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be able to
release your funds from that agreement until they use their funds not for charity.

- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on
bitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect to
the technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt that
even putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a hedge
fund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically under-
valued. | made sure to get a few invited to the class, we'll see if he’s right. On the whole, it will be
interesting to see the caliber of engineer Japan has to offer on this front.

Best,

Jeremy

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029090
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013576.txt,"Leaving the framework of physical thermodynamic entropies entirely, the
entropy of information was introduced in the context of communication engineering
in electrical and electronic devices. The metaphorical machine for the current age of
entropy, analogous to the role of heat and steam engines in_ classical
thermodynamics, is the computer. Energy in this context is a relatively trivial
property. Ammeters and other monitors of load are unable to discriminate between
a computer actively engaged in encoding and computation or one simply
maintaining its dynamic memory while resting in computational readiness. This
situation is very analogous to the results of early work discussed previously on the
metabolic rates and sources of the whole brain’s energy, oxygen and glucose
metabolism, by National Institutes of Mental Heath’s Seymore Kety and Louis
Sokoloff and the State of Illinois Thudicum Laboratory’s Harold Himwich. Using
whole head arterial-venous, energy-in, energy-out, differences, they could not
demonstrate differences in rates of whole brain metabolism between states in which
the human subjects were engaged in solving mathematical problems or deeply
sleep. In today’s brain imaging research, using a variety of physical reflections of
the brain’s metabolic activity, it is the differences in regional distributions of
metabolic activity that are relatable to subjective and behavioral states, not
differences in total amount of energy expended. In _ graphically coded
representations of the regional metabolism of the brain in action, one or another or
many areas “light up” and others “grow dark” in correlation with changes in thinking,
feeling and action.

The entropy first developed by Claude Shannon was formalized for use in
1948 in what was then called communication theory and now information theory. It
represented a measure of the ambiguity and uncertainty that had the potential for
being resolved by new knowledge. In this context, entropy and information were
obviously complementary descriptors. A message that informs us about which of
ten possibilities should be chosen contains less information than one that informs us
about the proper choice to be made from among a thousand possibilities. The
entropy of communication theory is a measure that is computed on uncertainty. The

information reception capacity of a system is dependent upon the amount of

76

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013576
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012668.txt,"TAB 38

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012668
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018625.txt,"something, or give a little, it makes a tiny bit of difference. Maybe you just have to stay
open. Keep trying. These things build up.”

""You don't understand,” I snapped. ""You don't know him! Maybe he really cares, but
even if he does, it doesn't matter! Things always end up the same. If I mention emotions,
or if I act warm to him, he'll ignore me for a while... and then he'll be cold to me again.
I'm telling you, I've been here before, with Richard. It's a trap.”

Mr. Ambition didn't waver. ""If you're strong enough,"" he said simply, ""then you can walk
into a trap.”

His words made my heart crack, my breath catch. Made me feel like I've forgotten
everything I knew about love.

When I was younger, I thought of my emotional strength like water: an embrace that
could make someone I loved feel lighter. Water is a slow, eroding force that pulls beauty
from the unexpected. Water makes wood into twisted driftwood sculptures; sharp glass
into opaque dim jewels; rocks into soft sand. Water will eventually reveal the heart of
everything it touches. If you let it.

I hadn't thought of myself that way in a long time. I felt like Mr. Ambition was calling
me out, reminding me of who I wanted to be. Maybe I protect myself better, these days.
But vulnerability is not always a bad thing.

I definitely could fall in love with this man, I realized.
""You're really amazing,"" I said, and threw myself on his chest.
He put his arms around me. ""So are you,"" he said.

TK OK ok

As a storyteller, I often look back on my relationships and pick out foreshadowing: the
omens. And by now, I recognize the omens even as they're happening... and sometimes I
change my behavior, but usually I don't. Perhaps this state is what they call maturity.

One night while we were out, Mr. Ambition sighed in an offhand way. He seemed tired,
out of sorts. ""I just want someone to take me on an emotional journey,” he remarked to
me. Then he added, ""... No offense.”

I mentioned this to a friend, later: ""Mr. Ambition says he wants me to take him on an
emotional journey,” I said.

""An 'emotional journey’? That shit gets old, though,"" said my friend. I laughed, and
agreed with him.

Another night, Mr. Ambition mentioned something about enjoying drama. I was with my
best girlfriend at the time; she and I looked at each other. ""Careful what you wish for,"" I
said.

My friend said, ""Yeah, I'm pretty sure Clarisse knows how to create arbitrary amounts of
drama at any time.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018625
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016047.txt,"e celebrate creativity with many competitions and prizes. I
W been a student of problem lists of over the years. Here
is my list of the problems remaining open in the modern
world. I’ve tied it in with other lists where relevant, and indicate what
you might win if you were to solve one. As I was writing this book, a few

of the questions were answered; the Higgs Boson was discovered and the
Poincaré Conjecture proven. I will keep the list up to date on the web site.

1. Mathematics ""e's Med!
1.1 The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture.“
1.2 Hodge Conjecture ©
1.3. Navier-Stokes Equations ©
1.4 A proof or disproof of P =NP ©
1.5 The Poincaré Conjecture © —- Solved
1.6 Riemann Hypothesis °°
1.7 Yang-Mills Theory ©
1.8 Can we understand and solve all 23 Hilbert Problems ™**
1.9 Goldbach Conjecture ™
1.10 Is mathematics fundamental to or simply a good model of
our Universe? ""°
1.11 Is mathematics an emergent property in our Universe or
causal? Which is more fundamental?
1.12 Fermat’s own original proof of his theorem!

2. Physi cs Nobel Prize for Physics

2.1 Are there many worlds or just one?

2.2 Does quantum collapse have meaning?

2.3 Will we find the Higgs-Boson? (Provisionally yes, 2012)

2.4 Do we need quantum gravity to explain human thought?

2.5 Will we observe gravitational waves, and what is the
current explanation for gravitational noise?

2.6 What causes the arrow of time and the asymmetry of
physical laws?

2.7 Do the constants of physics change over time?

2.8 Is quantum computation sufficient to simulate the universe,
or is the universe non-computational?

2.9 Can magnetic monopoles exist?

2.10 What is meant by quantum non-locality, a.k.a., spooky

action at a distance?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016047
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018743.txt,"﻿An Iconic Offering
A 38.5 Acre
Development Site
on the Las Vegas Strip
Exclusive Agents
2
Marc D. Renard 213-955-6413
Vice Chairman
marc.renard@cushwake.com
Manfred W. Schaub 213-955-5128
Senior Director
manfred.schaub@cushwake.com
John C. Cushman III 213-629-6575
Chairman
john.cushman@cushwake.com
John Stinson (65) 6232 0878
Executive Managing Director
(65) 6232 0878
john.stinson@ap.cushwake.com
Lic. #616335
Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc.
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4700
Los Angeles, California 90017
Lic: #955076
Geoffrey West 702-688-6936
Senior Director
gwest@comre.com
Commerce Real Estate Solutions
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite
100S
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Confidentiality & Conditions
This is a confidential Offering Memorandum intended
solely for your limited use and benefit in determining
whether you desire to express any further interest in
the purchase of the 38.5-acre site (“the Property”).
This Offering Memorandum was prepared by
Cushman & Wakefield and Commerce Real Estate
Solutions (“Cushman & Wakefield”) and has been
reviewed by representatives of the owners of The
Property (“the Ownership”). It contains selected
information pertaining to the Property and does not
purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the
information that prospective purchasers may desire.
It should be noted that all information provided is
for general reference purposes only in that such
information is based on assumptions relating to the
general economy, competition, and other factors
beyond the control of Ownership and, therefore, is
subject to material variation. Additional information
and an opportunity to inspect the Property will be
made available to interested and qualified prospective
purchasers. Neither Ownership nor Cushman &
Wakefield nor any of their respective officers have
made any representation or warranty, express or
implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this
Offering Memorandum, any of its contents, or any
other materials provided as a courtesy to facilitate
prospective purchaser’s own investigations of the
Property, and no legal commitments or obligations
shall arise by reason of this Offering Memorandum,
its contents or any further information provided by
Cushman & Wakefield regarding the Property.
It is essential that all parties to real estate transactions
be aware of the health, liability and economic impact
of environmental factors on real estate. Cushman &
Wakefield does not conduct investigations or analyses
of environmental matters and, accordingly, urges its
clients to retain qualified environmental professionals
to determine whether hazardous or toxic wastes
or substances (such as asbestos, PCB’s and other
contaminants or petro-chemical products stored in
underground tanks) or other undesirable materials
or conditions are present at the Property and, if so,
whether any health danger or other liability exists. Such
substances may have been used in the construction or
operation of buildings or may be present as a result of
previous activities at the Property.
Various laws and regulations have been enacted at
the federal, state and local levels dealing with the use,
storage, handling, removal, transport and disposal of
toxic or hazardous wastes and substances. Depending
upon past, current and proposed uses of the Property,
it may be prudent to retain an environmental expert to
conduct a site investigation and/or building inspection.
If such substances exist or are contemplated to be
used at the Property, special governmental approvals
or permits may be required. In addition, the cost
of removal and disposal of such materials may be
substantial. Consequently, legal counsel and technical
experts should be consulted where these substances
are or may be present.
Ownership and Cushman & Wakefield expressly
reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to reject any
or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase
the Property and/or terminate discussions with any
entity at any time with or without notice. Ownership
shall have no legal commitment or obligation to
any entity reviewing this Offering Memorandum or
making an offer to purchase the Property unless and
until a written commitment to purchase the Property
has been fully executed, delivered and approved
by Ownership and any conditions to Ownership’s
obligations thereunder have been satisfied or waived.
Except for representations and warranties expressly
set forth in such definitive, executed purchase and
sale agreement, Ownership makes and will make no
representations and warranties regarding the Property
and any prospective purchaser must rely entirely on
its own investigations and those of its agents and
consultants.
By receipt of this Offering Memorandum, you agree
that this Offering Memorandum and its contents are of
a confidential nature, that you will hold and treat it in
the strictest confidence, and that you will not disclose
this Offering Memorandum or any of its contents to
any other entity without the prior written authorization
of Ownership nor will you use this Offering
Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or
manner detrimental to the interest of Ownership or
Cushman & Wakefield.
The terms and conditions stated in this section will relate
to all of the sections of the Offering Memorandum as
if stated independently therein. If, after reviewing this
Offering Memorandum, you have no further interest
in purchasing the Property at this time, kindly return
this Offering Memorandum to Cushman & Wakefield
at your earliest possible convenience. Photocopying or
other duplication is not authorized.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
The Offering.......................................................................................... 5
3
2nd Largest Hotel
4,752 Rooms
3rd Largest Hotel
4,408 Rooms
4th Largest Hotel
4,008 Rooms
The Largest Hotel
6,852 Rooms
MGM GRAND
THE LOT
750’ of Direct Frontage
505’ FAA Approval
Located adjacent to
4 of the 5 largest hotels
in North America
4
Executive
Summary
The Offering
Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., as exclusive advisor, is pleased to offer for sale a remarkable 38.5-
acre development site on the world famous Las Vegas Strip. Situated directly across from the
Mandalay Bay Resort, an investor could obtain permits within approximately nine months to
develop a visionary themed large-scale resort and gaming destination with up to 10,000 hotel
rooms. An approved height allowance of up to 505 feet will make any future development on
the Site the most highly visible on the Strip to the more than 42 million annual visitors travelling
through McCarron International Airport. In addition private aircraft “high roller” terminals
adjacent to the Site create a very unique opportunity to provide exclusive direct jet access points.
Las Vegas gaming revenues, levels of new development, visitor volumes and visitor spending
are all approaching record levels making the timing associated with the development of the Site
extremely compelling.
Las Vegas possesses a unique international appeal that draws an incredible 3.5 million visitors
each and every month. The growth in tourism is only expected to accelerate with McCarran
International Airport anticipated to be the fifth fastest growing airport in the country over the next
10 years with passenger volume projected to reach 55 million. Las Vegas’ growth is expected to
be bolstered by a mix of additional seats by domestic and international carriers through more
flights and larger aircraft and new service from international carriers including nonstop flights
from China within three years. Over 4 million square feet of new convention space and more than
$6 billion of new resort, retail and entertainment developments continue to elevate the overall
“Las Vegas experience”.
5
AEG/MGM
Sports Are
The Site
■■
Remarkable 38.5-acre site will support a themed, large-scale casino resort development
■■
Six to nine month approval process to break ground
■■
750 feet of direct Strip frontage
■■
In-place income generated by existing buildings
■■
505’ of FAA approved height allowance fronting the Strip
The Largest Hotel
6,852 Rooms
■■
H-1 zoning flexibility allows for resort casino/gaming, luxury retail, multifamily, retail, timeshare
■■
Direct visibility to 42 million visitors traveling through McCarran International Airport
■■
Views to south will be unobstructed forever due to lower buildable height restrictions on the south
■■
Existing streets bounding all sides of the Site provide excellent access
CONCEPTUAL PLANS FOR CASINO RESORT OF 9,360 ROOMS
6
Private Aircraft
“High Roller”
Terminals at LAS
Tropicana Ave
Reno Ave
MGM Grand
The Lot
Triple 5
Development
Project
Las Vegas Blvd
na
4th Largest Hotel
4,008 Rooms
3rd Largest Hotel
4,408 Rooms
2nd Largest Hotel
4,752 Rooms
Convention Space
2.1 Million SF
7
Strong Las Vegas Economy Justifies New Development
■ ■ $6 billion of under construction and planned Strip development is the greatest since 1950’s
■ ■ $45.1 billion in annual visitor revenue during 2014, a new record
■■
41.1 million visitors in 2014; 2015 is on track to hit 42 million, a new record
■■
4 million square feet of new convention space under development, a new record
■ ■ $9.6 billion in gaming revenues in 2014 near peak 2007 levels
■■
Visitor volume projected to increase by 500,000 every year for the foreseeable future
■■
Average hotel occupancy is 92% on the Strip
■■
Tier One hotel ADR was $232 in 2014
■■
Nearly 650,000 new residents since 2000, representing 47% growth during the past decade
■■
1.3 million more room nights were sold in 2014 over 2013
($ Billions)
50
45
40
35
30
25
24.6
LAS VEGAS VISITOR ECONOMIC IMPACT 2000 - 2014
Las Vegas Visitor Economic Impact
$28.7
33.7
31.5 31.9 31.6 32.8
$36.7
$39.4
41.6 $41.6
$36.8
$35.2
$40.2
$44.9 $45.0 $45.1
Attendance (millions)
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.9
LAS VEGAS CONVENTION STATISTICS
Attendance Conventions
6.3
6.2
6.2
5.9
5.7 5.7
5.0 5.1
5.0
4.9
4.5 4.5
5.1
5.2
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
# of Conventions
20
3.5
5,000
15
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
$45.1 Billion
Visitor Revenues hit New Record
3
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
4,000,000 Square Feet
Convention Space under Construction to Accommodate Demand
8
Surrounded By World Class Retail
RETAILERS TO THE SOUTH
RETAILERS TO THE NORTH
10
18 OF THE 30 LARGEST RESORTS
IN THE WORLD ARE ON THE STRIP
11
THE TRANSFORMATION
OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE STRIP
$100 Million Shops at Tropicana
Planned
$375 Million AEG-MGM 20,000
Seat Arena Under Construction
Luxury 300,000 Retail Frontage at
Excalibur Planned
Monte Carlo Frontage and Theatre
Under Construction
12
Mandalay Bay Convention
Expands to 2.1 Million SF
MGM Opened The Lot and City of Rock May 2015
drawing 300,000 people in four days
$6 Billion In New Development
■■
Group’s multi-billion dollar Asian-themed
resort on the Strip (expected to open in 2018)
and Alon Crown 1,100 room Alon breaking
ground in 2016.
■■
MGM & AEG’s 20,000-seat arena under
construction between New York-New York
and Monte Carlo will draw hundreds of
thousands of new visitors per year.
$4.5 Billion 3,000 Room Resorts World
Under Construction
■■
Major renovations are underway or complete
at The Venetian, Mandalay Bay, MGM Grand,
The Mirage, Bellagio, the New Tropicana Las
Vegas, SLS Hotel and Four Seasons Hotel.
$2 billion Alon Crown
Resorts Planned
Silverton Timeshares
Under Construction
13
Wyndam Blue Timeshares
Opened July 2015
$2.5 billion Convention Center
Expansion Planned
14
Offering Procedures
Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. (“C&W”) is contacting prospective
purchasers in order to solicit their interest in the acquisition
of The Site on Las Vegas Strip. The Property is being offered
on a strict “as-is” basis with the selection of the buyer being
influenced by the level of physical and economic due diligence
initially undertaken by prospective purchasers. In this regard,
detailed financial information, title reports, service contracts
and other relevant documentation are available for review.
Property Tours
Prospective purchasers are asked to contact C&W to arrange
specific times for property tours.
Offer Submission
Prospective purchasers are kindly requested to submit offers
to Cushman & Wakefield at their earliest convenience but no
later than XX, XX, XXXX at the address specified below:
Marc D. Renard
Vice Chairman
213-955-6413
marc.renard@cushwake.com
Private Aircraft
“High Roller”
Terminals at LAS
Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc.
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4700
Los Angeles, California 90017
Facsimile: (213) 627-5995
15
750’ OF DIRECT FRONTAGE
16
The Site
The Site is comprised of 12 parcels totaling approximately 38.475 net acres located at the southeast corner of Las Vegas Boulevard
South and East Mandalay Bay Road on the world famous Las Vegas Strip.
Current improvements on the Site include the Desert Oasis Motel, The Oasis Apartments, a two-story office building at 3951 Las
Vegas Boulevard South and a one-story commercial building at 3953 Las Vegas Boulevard South. The former Skyvue development
planned for the northwest portion of the Property received FAA height approvals and was planned for the world’s tallest ferris
wheel approximately 467-feet tall and a two-story retail / convention complex. Two concrete support columns for the wheel,
approximately 240-feet tall, and four concrete foundations were built before construction was halted in August 2012.
The adjacent properties to the east fronting Haven Street are the signature private jet terminals of McCarran International Airport
and the private jet terminal of the Las Vegas Sands Corp; to the west of the Site are Mandalay Bay Resort Casino and Convention
Center, the Four Seasons Resort and Luxor Resort Casino; to the north of the Site are MGM’s music festival property “The Lot”
and the Tropicana Resort Casino; and to the south is undeveloped land primarily owned by the multinational conglomerate Triple
5 Group that is restricted by lower height limitations of approximately 284 feet.
Site highlights include:
■■
Income in-place of approximately $500,000 from existing tenants provides revenue while planning concept and designs
are approved
■■
Unique opportunity to create branding synergies with private ingress/egress points to the adjacent high roller jet terminals
■■
Preferred south Strip location adjacent to four of the largest resorts in North America (MGM Grand, Mandalay Bay,
Excalibur and Luxor).
■■
Established and high traffic location on the Las Vegas Strip
■■
Numerous world-class resorts, convention centers, luxury shopping, dining and entertainment attractions within walking
distance.
■ ■ Proximate to the I-15 and I-215 Freeways
Parcels, Land Area and Summary of Existing Improvements
17
NO.
ASSESSOR
PARCEL
ADDRESS PROPERTY USE 2014 NOI
YEAR
BUILT
ACREAGE
1 162-28-202-013 95 East Ali Baba Lane Former Casey Arms Apartments site/Undeveloped - - 8.965
2 162-28-301-001 47 East Mandalay Bay Road Former Happi Inn site/ Skyvue construction - - 0.769
3 162-28-301-002 47 East Mandalay Bay Road Former Happi Inn site/ Skyvue construction - - 0.45
4 162-28-301-010 3953 Las Vegas Boulevard South (1-story commercial): Psychic Sessions $18,000 1960 0.233
5 162-28-301-029 N/A Graded/Undeveloped - - 5.822
6 162-28-301-032 3951 Las Vegas Boulevard South (2-story): offices - Skyvue construction - 1998 3.348
7 162-28-301-033 N/A Graded/Concrete channel - - 3.767
8 162-28-301-034 3965 Las Vegas Boulevard South (2-story): Desert Oasis Motel & Apts- 48 rooms ($13,624) 1963 3.026
9 162-28-301-036 3941 Las Vegas Boulevard South Former Olympus Inn site/ Skyvue construction - - 1.76
10 162-28-301-037 N/A Skyvue construction - - 1.82
11 162-28-302-001 N/A Graded/Undeveloped - - 2.229
12 162-28-310-001 5316 Danville Lane, 5333 Bethel Lane The Oasis Apartments - 128 units $268,675 1984 6.286
TOTAL $273,051 38.475
UTILITIES
The Site has full utility services provided by the following:
■■
Electricity: NV Energy
■■
Natural Gas: Southwest Gas Company
■■
Water: Las Vegas Valley Water District
EXISTING INCOME
The existing improvements on the Site, inclusive of the Desert Oasis
Motel, Oasis Apartments and the strip retail building at 3953 Las
Vegas Boulevard generate approximately $275,000 in annual net
income.
■■
Sewer: Clark County Water Reclamation District
■■
Waste: Republic Services
18
Catholic
Church
ALI BABA LN
Quali Air
Center
“The Lot”
GILES STREET
(Former Casey
Arms Apartment)
Graded/
Undeveloped
Vacant
Kinder-Morgan Facility
HACIENDA AVE
Skyvue
Construction
Site
Concrete
Columns
Motel 8
Desert Oasis
Motel/Apartment
Work
Gate
Two-Stiory
Office Building
Chain
Link Fence
Building A
Cconcrete Channel
Crushed
Asphalt Gravel
DANVILLE LN.
The Oasis
Apartments
BETHEL LN
Block Walls
HAVEN STREET
Improvements MANDALAY BAY ROAD and Access
Existing streets bound all sides of the
Site provide excellent access. Las Vegas
Boulevard South is a fully improved six
lane arterial with two main traffic lanes
in each direction where it fronts the
Site. East Mandalay Bay Road is a fully
improved two lane collector McCarranstreets with
one traffic lane in each Airport direction. Haven
Property
Street is a fully improved two lane street
with one traffic lane in each direction.
Four Seasons
Hotel
Laughing
Jackalope
(Closed)
Commercial
Building B
Mobile
Mini
Container
MESA VISTA AVE
Crushed Asphalt Gravel
Fence
DIABLO AVENUE
Smart Mart /
Shell Gas Station Undeveloped
Undeveloped
Private Aircraft
“High Roller” Terminals at LAS
19

Zoning
The Site is zoned H-1. This zoning
provides for full service casino resorts and
is the Strips primary gaming enterprise
designation. Permitted uses include casino
hotels, resort hotels, inns and motels,
apartment rentals and condominiums,
timeshares, public and institutional
buildings, bars, restaurants, retail shops,
and similar uses.
The Site is located within a Mixed-Use
Overlay District. The Clark County Board of
Commissioners approved an ordinance to
the Clark County Code, Title 30 as Chapter
30.48 that established four different
designations for Mixed-Use. The Board
also established a number of Mixed Use
Overlay Districts, with the majority being
along or in close proximity to The Las Vegas
Strip. The Site is within the designation of
MUD-1, the most intense density zoning
primarily located along the Las Vegas Strip
resort corridor. The establishment of the
Mixed Overlay District and the granting of
the land use of MUD-1 make it easier for
properties to receive approvals for mixeduse,
high rise projects.
20
FAA Approved Height Allowance Up To 505 Feet On The Site
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has provided determination letters for the Site approving a height allowance of 505 feet fronting
Las Vegas Boulevard and decreasing to 354 feet on the eastern portion of the Site. It should be noted that in March 2011 the Clark County
has a Board of County Commissioners unanimously approved the development of the 500 foot observation wheel and retail/convention
space on 10.0 net acres of the Site.
505’ 354’ 284’ 91’
600 ft
500 ft
400 ft
300 ft
200 ft
100 ft
THE STRIP
PROPERTY
21
Renderings and Plans
Current ownership has drafted conceptual plans that include the development of 9,360 hotel rooms with approximately 350,000 square feet
of retail, conference and casino gaming space.
22
6 to 9 Month Permitting Process to Break Ground
The following is an outline of the estimated 6 to 9 month permitting process an investor will follow to enter into a development agreement
within Clark County. Prior to starting the development agreement process with the County, the developer would acquire permit approvals
from the Paradise Town Advisory Board.
Traffic study
submitted
RISE reports
distributed
upon receipt
Pre-submittal
conference
Redistribute
RISE reports
response
from agencies
RISE
acceptance
letter
Development
agreement
hearing
Day 1 Day 15 Day 30 Day 45 Day 60* Day 105* Day 150
Pre-submittal filing:
initial regional
infrastructure
services evaluation
(“RISE”) reports
submitted.
evidence of traffic
study submittal.
Agencies
encouraged
to submit
draft
comments
Agencies
encouraged
to submit
draft
comments
Revised
RISE reports
submitted
by applicant
Special use
permit filed
Commence
and continue
to negotiate
Development
agreement**
*Acceptance letter may be issued within 30 days of presubmittal conference depending upon applicant’s response.
**Development Agreement may be submitted in conjunction with Special Use Permit if negotiations are complete.
Fixed timeline may be flexible dependent upon applicant’s response time.
23
Available Third Party Reports and Documentation
The following summarizes available third party reports that are posted within the online
due diligence site:
■■
ALTA Survey Wallace Morris Surveying, dated May 2013
■■
Title Report by First American, dated July 2015
■■
Tax bills 2014 – 2015
■■
Phase I by Western Technologies Inc., dated April 2014
■■
Phase II by Western Technologies Inc., dated August 2003
■■
Limited Phase II by Western Technologies Inc., dated August 2004
■■
Geotechnical Evaluation by Western Technologies Inc., dated October 2003
■■
Geotechnical Evaluation by Western Technologies Inc., dated August 2004
■■
Geotechnical Evaluation by Western Technologies Inc., dated July 2011
■■
Geotechnical Recommendation Letters of by Western Technologies Inc., dated February
2012, April 2014
■■
Zoning Declaration Letter by Clark County Planning Department, dated October 2008
■ ■ Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Height Determination Letters, dated May 2011,
June 2012, February 2015
24
Area
Overview
The Las Vegas Experience
Developed as an entertainment destination, Las
Vegas is driven by a consumer services economy
where “the experience” is its primary commodity.
Las Vegas is one of the most visited tourist
destinations in the United States and it possesses a
unique international appeal that draws a remarkable
3.4 million visitors each month. Identified as the
global capital of entertainment and gaming, it is
the iconic three-mile stretch of Las Vegas Boulevard
known as “the Strip” that draws visitors to Las
Vegas. With 115,000 hotel rooms located on the
Strip, the concentration of tourists is more than
any other metropolitan statistical area in the world.
The Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Association
reported 41.1 million visitors in 2014 and project the
total number of visitors to reach a new market high
of 42 million in 2015.
25
Unparalleled Hotel and Resort Inventory
Las Vegas has a larger supply of hotel rooms than any other metropolitan statistical area in the world and in return drives extraordinary
spending demographics. The vast majority of Las Vegas’ lodging supply is located on the Strip, and approximately 76% of all visitors (31
million) to Las Vegas stay in hotels on the Strip each year. Luxurious mega-resorts as well as more moderately priced accommodations are
concentrated on the Strip and in the immediate surrounding area to meet the needs of all segments of the visitor market. A comparable
resort district cannot be found anywhere else.
As summarized in the exhibit below, 17 of the 30 largest resorts in the world are located on the Las Vegas Strip:
THE WORLD’S 30 LARGEST HOTELS AND RESORTS
RANK RESORT LOCATION ROOMS RANK RESORT LOCATION ROOMS
1 MGM Grand Las Vegas 6,852 16 Flamingo Las Vegas 3,565
2 First World Hotel Genting Highlands 6,118 17 Atlantis Paradise Island 3,414
3 Disney’s All-Star Hotel Orlando 5,524 18 Hilton Hawaiian Village Honolulu 3,386
4 Izmailovo Moscow 5,000 19 Disney’s Port Orleans French Quarter Lake Buena Vista 3,056
5 Mandalay Bay Las Vegas 4,752 20 Mirage Las Vegas 3,044
6 Luxor Las Vegas 4,408 21 Monte Carlo Las Vegas 3,002
7 Ambassador City Jotiem Pattaya 4,219 22 Venetian Macau Macau 3,000
8 The Venetian Las Vegas 4,049 23 Cosmopolitan Las Vegas 2,998
9 Excalibur Las Vegas 4,008 24 Westgate Las Vegas Resort and Casino Las Vegas 2,956
10 Aria Resort & Casino Las Vegas 4,004 25 Paris Las Vegas 2,916
11 Caesars Palace Las Vegas 3,960 26 Treasure Island Las Vegas 2,884
12 Bellagio Las Vegas 3,950 27 Gaylord Opryland Resort Nashville 2,881
13 Sheraton Macau 3,896 28 Disney’s Pop Resort Lake Buena Vista 2,880
14 Circus Circus Las Vegas 3,774 29 Bally’s Las Vegas 2,814
15 Shinagawa Prince Hotel Tokyo 3,680 30 Borgata Atlantic City 2,802
Located in Las Vegas
26
Convention Centers and Trade Shows
Las Vegas is the world’s most preferred convention and trade show city, offering more convention and meeting space than any other city in
the world, with more than 11 million square feet of existing inventory, including more than 2.0 million square feet that have been completed
during the past three years and an additional 4 million square feet of convention space is currently in development. The total annual nongaming
economic impact of conventions hosted by all Las Vegas facilities totals approximately $8.0 billion. Notable conventions scheduled
in Las Vegas during 2015 and 2016 include the following:
CONVENTIONS & TRADE SHOWS (2015-2016)
DATE EVENT ATTENDEES
January-16 International CES 2016 163,000
November-15 Automotive Aftermarket Industry Week (AAIW) 2015 140,000
January-16 Las Vegas Market - Winter 2016 50,000
August-16 Las Vegas Market - Summer 2016 50,000
February-16 World of Concrete 2016 48,000
September-15 2015 Pack Expo Las Vegas 45,000
September-15 Super Mobility Week 40,000
March-16 Nightclub and Bar Show 2016 39,000
May-16 RECon 2016 36,000
June-16 International Communications Industries Association/ Infocomm 2016 35,000
May-16 National Hardware Show 2016 30,000
April-16 National Automobile Dealers Association 2016 30,000
March-16 Healthcare Information & Management Systems Society (HIMSS16) 30,000
October-15 National Association of Convenience Stores, Inc. (NACS) Exposition 2015 30,000
September-15 2015 Mr. Olympia 30,000
June-16 International Esthetics Cosmetics & Spa Conference (IECSC) 2016 25,000
November-15 American Academy of Opthalmology Annual Meeting 2015 25,000
November-15 National Business Aviation Association, Inc. (NBAA) - 2015 25,000
September-15 Interbike Expo 2015 25,000
January-16 Kitchen and Bath Industry Show 2016 24,000
July-16 Deafnation World Expo 2016 23,000
February-16 Safari Club International 44th Annual Hunters Convention 21,000
December-15 Power-Gen International Conference 2015 20,000
October-15 G2E: Global Gaming Expo 2015 17,000
October-15 ISSA / INTERCLEAN North America 2015 16,000
March-16 Western Veterinary Conference 2016 14,500
October-15 ABC Kids Expo 2015 14,000
October-15 Live Design International 2015 14,000
September-15 International Vision Expo West 2015 14,000
June-16 Waste Expo 2016 12,000
March-16 National Association of Pizzeria Operators Expo - 2016 12,000
March-16 International Wireless Communications Expo 2016 12,000
27
Strong Increase in Visitor Economics
The following chart presents a history of visitor volumes and total visitor revenue for Las Vegas:
LAS VEGAS TOURISM IMPACT
YEAR TOTAL VISITORS % CHANGE
TOTAL VISITOR
REVENUE
% CHANGE
REVENUE PER
VISITOR
% CHANGE
1988 17,199,808 --- 10,039,448,000 --- 584 ---
1989 18,129,684 5.4 11,912,941,000 18.7 657 12.6
1990 20,954,420 15.6 14,320,746,000 20.2 683 4.0
1991 21,315,116 1.7 14,326,554,000 0.0 672 (1.7)
1992 21,886,865 2.7 14,686,644,000 2.5 671 (0.2)
1993 23,522,593 7.5 15,127,167,000 3.0 643 (4.2)
1994 28,214,362 19.9 19,163,212,000 26.7 679 5.6
1995 29,002,122 2.8 20,686,800,000 8.0 713 5.0
1996 29,636,361 2.2 22,533,258,000 8.9 760 6.6
1997 30,464,635 2.8 24,952,189,000 10.7 819 7.7
1998 30,605,128 0.5 24,577,469,000 (1.5) 803 (2.0)
1999 33,809,134 10.5 28,695,178,000 16.8 849 5.7
2000 35,849,691 6.0 31,462,337,000 9.6 878 3.4
2001 35,017,317 (2.3) 31,907,492,000 1.4 911 3.8
2002 35,071,504 0.2 31,613,938,000 (0.9) 901 (1.1)
2003 35,540,126 1.3 32,777,906,000 3.7 922 2.3
2004 37,388,781 5.2 33,724,467,000 2.9 902 (2.2)
2005 38,566,717 3.2 36,733,453,000 8.9 952 5.6
2006 38,914,889 0.9 39,406,265,000 7.3 1,013 6.3
2007 39,196,761 0.7 41,578,079,000 5.5 1,061 4.8
2008 37,481,552 (4.4) 42,900,000,000 3.2 1,145 7.9
2009 36,351,469 (3.0) 35,200,000,000 (17.9) 968 (15.4)
2010 37,335,436 2.7 36,800,000,000 4.5 986 1.8
2011 38,928,708 4.3 40,200,000,000 9.2 1,033 4.8
2012 39,727,022 2.1 44,900,000,000 11.7 1,130 9.4
2013 39,668,221 (0.1) 45,200,000,000 0.7 1,139 0.8
2014 41,126,512 3.7 45,200,000,000 0.0 1,099 (3.5)
AVERAGE ANNUAL % CHANGE 3.4 6.0 2.5
Source: LVCVA
28
Strong Increase in Convention Attendance
With 11 million square feet of existing and planned convention space, Las Vegas
is one of the world’s most convention destinations. The Las Vegas Convention
Center is the primary Las Vegas convention venue, a state-of-the-art facility,
which features 3.2 million square-feet of exhibit and meeting space, and will
soon expand to 5.8 million square feet. The following demonstrates the strong
increase of convention attendance during the previous five years:
CONVENTION VISITATION
YEAR TOTAL VISITORS % CHANGE
1983 943,611 ---
1984 1,050,916 11.4
1985 1,072,629 2.1
1986 1,519,421 41.7
1987 1,677,716 10.4
1988 1,702,158 1.5
1989 1,508,842 (11.4)
1990 1,742,194 15.5
1991 1,794,444 3.0
1992 1,969,435 9.8
1993 2,439,734 23.9
1994 2,684,171 10.0
1995 2,924,879 9.0
1996 3,305,507 13.0
1997 3,519,424 6.5
1998 3,301,705 (6.2)
1999 3,772,726 14.3
2000 3,853,363 2.1
2001 5,014,240 30.1
2002 5,105,450 1.8
2003 5,657,796 10.8
2004 5,724,864 1.2
2005 6,166,194 7.7
2006 6,307,961 2.3
2007 6,209,253 (1.6)
2008 5,899,725 (5.0)
2009 4,492,275 (23.9)
2010 4,473,134 (0.4)
2011 4,865,272 8.8
2012 4,944,014 1.6
2013 5,107,416 3.3
2014 5,169,054 1.2
Annual Compound % Change 5.6
Source: LVCVA
29
4 Million Square Feet of
Convention Space in Development
The $2.5 billion convention center expansion will generate an
increase in demand of 500,000 visitors per year
Indicative of the strong growth in convention demand, in
February 2015 the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority
(LVCVA) acquired the former Riviera hotel located on 23-acres
for $182.5 million. A planned $40 million demolition during
2015-2016 of the former hotel will lay the foundation for a $2.5
billion expansion of the Las Vegas Convention Center, increasing
convention capacity to 5.8 million square feet. The expansion
will transform the current convention center, rebranded as the
Las Vegas Global Business District, and support the demand
growth projected to be an additional 500,000 visitors per year.
Phase One is currently underway and includes developing
750,000 square-feet of new exhibit space and 187,500 squarefeet
of supporting meeting space, renovating and upgrading
the existing facility, incorporating touch screens, faster Internet
speeds, new restaurants and an updated façade. Phase II
includes the expansion onto the former Riviera site from a
current total footprint of 3.2 million square-feet to 5.7 million
square-feet of space, with new street infrastructure and new
centralized transportation hub for the entire city. Additionally,
the expansion project will include development of a new office
park in the neighborhood surrounding the center.
In addition to the LVCVA space, 350,000 square feet of convention
space at Mandalay Bay and 1,000,000 square feet of convention
space at Genting Group’s Resorts World are under construction.
Attendance (millions)
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
3.9
5.0 5.1
LAS VEGAS CONVENTION STATISTICS
5.7 5.7
Attendance
6.2
6.3
6.2
5.9
Conventions
4.5 4.5
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
4.9
5.0
5.2 million convention attendees
in 2014 isthe highest in 6 years and
represents significant potential for growth
5.1
5.2
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
# of Conventions
30
Development on the Strip
With approximately $21 billion in high-profile developments completed since 2008, the Strip has attracted significant investment capital
from both ownership entities that already possess a significant stake in the future success of the Strip and new capital sources seeking to
benefit from Las Vegas’ exceptional long-term fundamentals. Resort and casino ownership is largely consolidated among operators that
are devoted to continuing to increase visitation levels by upgrading the Las Vegas experience.
RECENT LAS VEGAS STRIP DEVELOPMENTS – 2013 TO 2018
PROPERTY
COST
($ MILLIONS)
CONVENTION
SPACE (SF)
ROOMS
TIMESHARE HOTEL
COMPLETED
2013
Caesars Palace - Nobu Hotel (former Centurion) $30 180 February 2013
The LINQ (Phase 1) $550 Fall 2013
TOTAL 2013 $580 0 180
2014
The Grandview at Las Vegas $55 400 February 2014
The LINQ (Phase 2) $230 849 February 2014
The Cromwell (Rebrand / Remodel) $185 May 2014
New York New York / Monte Carlo (Open Air Plaza) $50 June 2014
SLS Las Vegas (Rebrand / Remodel) $415 80,000 1,613 August 2014
Delano (Reband / Remodel) $80 September 2014
Red Rock Casino (Renovation) $35 Fall 2014
Golden Nugget (Remodel) $15 December 2014
TOTAL 2014 $1,065 80,000 2,862
2015
Wyndham Desert Blue $172 281 March 2015
Bellagio (Renovation) $55 April 2015
The Grand Bazaar Shops $50 February 2015
Caesars Palace (Omnia Nightclub) $38 March 2015
Treasure Island $15 April 2015
Galleria at Sunset $26 Spring 2015
Rock in Rio (MGM Resorts Festival Grounds) $20 May 2015
TOTAL 2015 $376 0 281
31
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
PROPERTY
COST
($ MILLIONS)
CONVENTION
SPACE (SF)
ROOMS
TIMESHARE HOTEL
COMPLETED
2016
MGM Resorts International Areana (Indoor Arena) $375 April 2016
Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino (Renovation) $66 January 2016
Topgolf Las Vegas (Renovation) $50 Spring 2016
Toshiba Plaza $66 January 2016
Henderson Space and Science Center $63 Spring 2016
Thomas & Mack Center (Renovation) $47 Spring 2016
Tropicana Las Vegas (Renovation) $20 Spring 2016
Boulevard Mall (Redevelopment) $23 Fall 2016
TOTAL 2016 $710 0 0
2018
All Net Resort and Arena $1,400 CY 2018
Resorts World Las Vegas (Phase 1) $4,000 Spring 2018
TOTAL 2018 $5,400 0 0
TOTAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT $6,110 0 0
32
Significant Projects
Resorts World Las Vegas – In 2013, the Genting Group purchased the 87-acre,
former Echelon site on the northern end of the Strip for $350 million. Branded
Resorts World, the planned Chinese Village-themed, four-phased mega-resort
broke ground June 2015 with opening planned in 2018. Construction of Phase I
on the multi-phased project is planned for 3,000-rooms, 22-villas, 3,500-gaming
machines, a 100,000-square-foot casino/gaming floor, 500,000-square-foot
convention center, dozens of dining options, more than 15-retail stores, a center
bar with live entertainment, a 50,000-square-foot, 58-foot tall exotic aquarium,
and the highest observation deck and sky park in the city. Subsequent phases
will add additional hotel rooms, gaming space, convention center space, a Great
Wall of China replica, a live panda exhibit, an indoor water park, a bowling alley,
a movie theater, and a 4,200-seat rotating theater.
Wyndham Desert Blue Time Share – The 19-story, 281-unit timeshare on Twain
Avenue just west of Interstate 15 opened in July 2015.
The Park by MGM – The Park is currently under construction between and around
New York-New York and Monte Carlo. The eight-acre site will feature natural
desert landscaping, cobblestone walkways, and several unique water features.
Man-made structures will proved shade during the day and will light up at night.
The outdoor space will feature live entertainment, patio style seating throughout,
ample shopping and indoor/outdoor dining options. This new venue between
New York-New York and Monte Carlo will connect The Park with the new Arena,
and both will open concurrently in the spring of 2016.
33
The Arena (MGM Resorts) – Construction broke ground in May 2014 on a 16-acre,
$375-million entertainment district located between Monte Carlo and New York-
New York. The MGM Resorts/AEG collaboration will consist of an indoor arena that
will feature 20,000-seats, 50-luxury suites, more than two-dozen private loge boxes,
club seating, and other specially designed exclusive hospitality offerings and dining
pavilions. Expected to hold more than 100-events annually, The Arena will be hosting
concerts, red-carpet award shows, professional sports events such as basketball or
hockey, boxing, mixed martial arts, and other major functions. Construction is slated
for completion in Spring 2016 and will open concurrently with The Park.
The Grand Bazaar Shops (Bally’s) – The $50-million outdoor retail complex is located
on the southeast corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Flamingo Road, in the front portion
of the property. Inspired by great markets from around the world, the shops contains
110-stores, including Swatch, Superdry, Havaianas, and Campo Marzio. More than a
third of the property will feature restaurants, bars and food outlets. The main feature of
the bazaar shops is an eye-catching tower called the Swarovski Crystal Starburst. The
tower is positioned over the brand’s store and displays a midnight show of lights and
music. The retail complex opened in January 2015.
City of Rock (MGM Resorts) – Opened in May 2015, City of Rock is located on the
southwest corner of East Sahara Avenue and South Las Vegas Boulevard. The
$30-million open air venue is home to one of the largest music festival venues in the
world, Rock in Rio (RiR). The venue has a capacity of 85,000, and during RiR, it will
feature six stages, a Ferris wheel, a zipline, shopping and themed food courts. The
Rock in Rio festival will held biennially, and MGM plans to use the site for other mega
festivals, athletic events and concerts when not in use for RiR.
34
All Net Resort Arena – is being built at a cost of approximately $1.4 billion and is set to
open in early 2018 on the north end of the Las Vegas Strip. In addition to a spectacular
860,000-square-foot arena that is able to host big ticket events, the complex includes
the Victory Plaza shopping and dining district and a 44-story hotel with 500 specialty
suites. The arena at the All Net Resort features a unique retractable roof. The Victory
Plaza area covers 300,000 square feet and is a pedestrian-only plaza that offers
something akin to the Times Square experience in New York.
Mandalay Bay Convention Center (Phase 1 & 2) – A $66-million expansion on the
Mandalay Bay Convention Center completed is scheduled to complete January 2016.
Construction on Phase 1 completed July 2015 adding more than 350,000-square-feet
of exhibit space, as well as underground parking. Phase 2 of the expansion will
include 70,000-square-feet of additional ballroom space that will be divisible by five
breakout areas for corporate groups. When completed, the convention center will
total 2,050,000 square feet.
Shops at Tropicana – A new, $100-million, 275,000-square-foot, two-story, enclosed
shopping mall will feature luxe retail, a food court on the ground floor with five new
boutique restaurants and two Strip-facing restaurants. The project is expected to
begin in fall 2015 with an anticipated completion date in the 2017.
35
The Site is Visible to Over 42 Million Visitors Per Year
MCCARRAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION
McCarran International Airport is one of the busiest airports in the country. McCarran serves both short and long haul markets, along
with international markets. In 2014, Airports Council International ranked McCarran ninth in North America and 25th in the world for
passenger traffic, with approximately 43 million arriving and departing passengers each year. 2014 observed an increase of over 1 million
more passengers over 2013, or a 2.4% increase in traffic. With over 30 air carriers, McCarran provides nonstop service to domestic and
international destinations including Canada, Germany, Mexico, the United Kingdom and South Korea. 2014 was the highest year on record
for international tourism, with over 3.3 million visitors to the Strip.
Major expansion and improvements totaling $3.5 billion include Terminal 3 that opened in 2012 and the new $100 million control tower was
completed in early 2015. The 1.9 million-square-foot expansion of Terminal 3 increased the airport’s annual capacity to approximately 55
million passengers.
TOTAL PASSENGERS (MILLIONS)
50.0
45.0
40.0
35.0
30.0
International Passengers
Domestic Passengers
36.9
1.22 35.2 35.0
36.3
1.09
1.08 1.01
41.4
1.42
MCCARRAN AIRPORT PASSENGER TRAFFIC
44.3
1.82
46.3
2.15
47.7
2.24
42.9 MILLION
TOTAL PASSENGERS IN 2014
3.3 MILLION
INTERNATIONAL PASSENGERS
44.1
2.24
40.5
2.21
39.8
2.20
41.5 41.7
42.0
2.61 2.88 2.97
42.9
3.34
25.0
35.6 34.1 34.0 35.2 40.0 42.4 44.2 45.5 41.8 38.3 37.6 38.9 38.8 39.0 39.5
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
36
Las Vegas Monorail
Plans for the expansion of the Monorail place the line and potential stops adjacent to the Site. The Las Vegas Monorail is a six-stop, elevated
train system that travels along a 3.9-mile route connecting major hotels and attractions along the Strip. It enables passengers to travel the
length of the resort corridor beginning at the MGM Grand with stops at Bally’s/Paris, Flamingo/Caesars Palace, Harrah’s/Imperial Palace,
Las Vegas Convention Center, the hotel called LVH and ending at the intersection of Sahara Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard. The train is
capable of transporting 3,200 passengers per hour in each direction and has carried over 50 million passengers.
Sahara Ave Station
LVH Station
Las Vegas Convention Center Station
Harrah’s/The Quad Station
Flamingo Station
Future Monorail
Bally’s/Paris Station
LAS VEGAS BLVD - THE STRIP
MGM Station
The
Site
37
38
Market Analysis
Overview
The Site is located within the Las Vegas Strip Gaming Enterprise Zoning
District (the “GED”). The GED supports the expansion of gaming and
entertainment activities and associated resort hotels. This zoning designation
offers an extremely flexible development approval process offering a number
of potential uses that can include, but are not limited to any combination of:
■■
Themed Resort and Hotel
■■
Casino and Gaming
■■
Condominiums
■■
Luxury/Upscale Retail
■■
Timeshares
■■
Dining and Entertainment
2014 LAS VEGAS STATISTICS
Visitor Volume 41,126,512
Hotel Room Inventory 150,544
Strip ADR $248.89
Strip Occupancy 90.2%
Strip RevPar $224.49
Convention Attendance 5,169,054
Convention Meetings 22,103
Clark County Gaming Revenue $9,554,002,000
Las Vegas Strip Gaming Revenue $6,372,526,000
39
Las Vegas Resort Hotel Market
The Las Vegas lodging market has historically attained occupancy levels well above the national average. The following table presents an
analysis of the Las Vegas lodging market since 1985:
LAS VEGAS LODGING STATISTICS
YEAR
INVENTORY
%
CHANGE
HOTEL
OCCUPANCY
%
CHANGE
MOTEL
OCCUPANCY
%
CHANGE
TOTAL
OCCUPANCY
%
CHANGE
TOTAL
ROOMS
OCCUPIED
%
CHANGE
1985 53,067 --- 84.7 --- 70.1 --- 79.8 --- 15,456,825 ---
1986 56,494 6.5 86.3 1.9 70.9 1.1 81.4 2.0 16,784,932 8.6
1987 58,474 3.5 87.0 0.8 74.0 4.4 83.4 2.5 17,800,070 6.0
1988 61,394 5.0 89.3 2.6 73.7 (0.4) 85.1 2.0 19,069,897 7.1
1989 67,391 9.8 89.9 0.7 72.5 (1.6) 85.2 0.1 20,957,253 9.9
1990 73,730 9.4 89.1 (0.9) 69.8 (3.7) 84.7 (0.6) 22,793,998 8.8
1991 76,879 4.3 85.2 (4.4) 62.6 (10.3) 80.3 (5.2) 22,532,851 (1.1)
1992 76,523 (0.5) 88.8 4.2 66.1 5.6 83.9 4.5 23,434,021 4.0
1993 86,053 12.5 92.6 4.3 69.7 5.4 87.6 4.4 27,514,586 17.4
1994 88,560 2.9 92.6 0.0 73.2 5.0 89.0 1.6 28,768,716 4.6
1995 90,046 1.7 91.4 (1.3) 72.4 (1.1) 88.0 (1.1) 28,922,775 0.5
1996 99,072 10.0 93.4 2.2 75.7 4.6 90.4 2.7 32,689,797 13.0
1997 105,347 6.3 90.3 (3.3) 68.8 (9.1) 86.4 (4.4) 33,222,230 1.6
1998 109,365 3.8 90.3 0.0 67.3 (2.2) 85.8 (0.7) 34,249,837 3.1
1999 120,294 10.0 92.1 2.0 68.6 1.9 88.0 2.6 38,638,433 12.8
2000 124,270 3.3 92.5 0.4 71.9 4.8 89.1 1.3 40,414,468 4.6
2001 126,610 1.9 88.9 (3.9) 63.8 (11.3) 84.7 (4.9) 39,142,115 (3.1)
2002 126,787 0.1 88.8 (0.1) 60.2 (5.6) 84.0 (0.8) 38,859,613 (0.7)
2003 130,482 2.9 89.6 0.9 60.5 0.5 85.0 1.2 39,760,735 2.3
2004 131,503 0.8 92.0 2.7 68.7 13.6 88.6 4.2 41,953,010 5.5
2005 133,186 1.3 91.8 (0.2) 72.0 4.8 89.2 0.7 43,362,698 3.4
2006 132,605 (0.4) 93.2 1.5 65.2 (9.4) 94.6 6.1 45,787,180 5.6
2007 132,947 0.3 94.0 0.9 64.5 (1.1) 90.4 (4.4) 43,867,192 (4.2)
2008 140,529 5.7 89.8 (4.5) 57.8 (10.4) 86.0 (4.9) 42,967,252 (2.1)
2009 148,941 6.0 85.3 (5.0) 50.1 (13.3) 81.5 (5.2) 41,986,134 (2.3)
2010 148,935 (0.0) 83.5 (2.1) 52.0 3.8 80.4 (1.3) 43,365,743 3.3
2011 150,161 0.8 86.9 4.1 56.0 7.7 83.8 4.2 45,654,165 5.3
2012 150,481 0.2 87.4 0.6 58.0 3.6 84.4 0.7 46,479,707 1.8
2013 150,593 0.1 87.1 (0.3) 59.8 3.1 84.3 (0.1) 46,191,449 (0.6)
2014 150,544 (0.0) 89.1 2.3 65.0 8.7 86.8 3.0 47,497,234 2.8
AVERAGE ANNUAL % CHANGE 3.7 0.2 (0.3) 0.3 3.9
YTD 5/14 149,347 --- 90.2 --- 66.8 --- 87.9 --- 19,909,507 ---
YTD 5/15 149,352 0.0 89.1 (1.2) 67.0 0.3 87.0 (1.0) 19,758,379 (0.8)
40
Luxury Resort Hotel Comparables
The following provides an overview of the anticipated competitive set
for a future hotel resort development at the Site. The more recently
opened properties are the Aria (as part of CityCenter) in 2009 and the
Cosmopolitan in 2010 Venetian/Palazzo and Wynn/Encore opened in
January and December of 2008, respectively. New ‘boutique’ entrants
to the Strip opening in 2014 include The Cromwell Las Vegas, an
upscale boutique property backed by Caesars Entertainment and SLS
Las Vegas. It should be noted that all of the newer properties are
geared toward the upper end of the market.
In May 2015, Genting Gaming announced the ground breaking
of Resorts World Las Vegas. Following this in June 2015, Crown
Resorts announced the purchase of the former Frontier site for the
development of Alon. These two projects will add approximately
4,000 high-end rooms to the Strip market.
41
SELECT LUXURY RESORTS AND CASINOS
ARIA RESORT & CASINO BELLAGIO THE COSMOPOLITAN VENETIAN / PALLAZZO WYNN / ENCORE
Hotel Summary
Owner MGM Resorts Intl. MGM Resorts Intl. Blackstone Las Vegas Sands Corp. Wynn Resorts Ltd.
Height 600 508 604 642 631
Acres n/a 76.00 8.45 67.00 215.00
Total Guest Rooms 4,004 3,933 2,959 7,095 4,750
2014 Average Daily Rate $217 $254 $307 $223 $274
2014 Occupancy 93% 93% 94% 88% 87%
2014 RevPar $202 $236 $287 $196 $238
Casino/Gaming Summary
Total Square Feet 150,000 156,000 99,719 225,000 186,000
# of Slot Machines 1,969 1,895 1,373 2,350 1,864
# of Tables 122 132 129 240 235
2014 Casino Revenue $422,979,000 n/a $203,247,000 $509,205,000 $687,436,000
Retail Summary
Retail The Shops at Crystals Via Bellagio n/a Grand Canal Shoppes Wynn Esplanade
Total Square Feet 500,000 44,000 35,744 875,000 99,000
# of Shops 57 12 16 160 25
Key Tenants
Louis Vuitton, Dolce &
Gabbana, Tiffany & Co.,
Roberto Vavalli, Bulgari,
Cartier, Van Cleef &
Arpels, Mikimoto
Bottega Veneta, Breguet,
Chanel, Dior, Fendi,
Giorgio Armani, Gucci,
Harry Winston,
Hermes, Louis Vuitton,
Prada,Tiffany & Co.
Allsaints, Spitalfields,
Sneaker Boutique,
Dna2050, Jason of
Beverly Hills, Molly
Brown’s Swimwear, Rent
the Runway, Stitched
Barney’s, Christian
Louboutin, Tory Burch,
Jimmy choo, Burberry,
Fendi, Diane von
Furstenberg, Michael
Kors, Sephora,
Swarovski
Alexander McQueen,
Cartier, Chanel, Dior,
Givenchy, Hermès, Louis
Vuitton, Manolo Blahnik,
Oscar de la Renta, Rolex
Entertainment Summary
# of Restaurants 16 20 13 38 13
# of Bars & Nightclubs 10 7 8 11 11
Convention/Meeting SF 300,000 200,000 151,500 2,300,000 284,000
Spa Square SF 80,000 55,000 50,000 134,000 n/a
42
Gaming Supply and Demand Analysis
Las Vegas is recognized worldwide as a premier gaming destination.
From traditional card and dice games, to slot machines and race and
sports book betting, the casino industry has flourished and evolved
into an international phenomenon. A significant portion of the visitor
revenue generated in the city is attributed to the gaming industry,
which posted $9.6 billion in revenue in 2014.
The initial step in analyzing supply and demand trends within a given
gaming market is to quantify the existing level of gaming inventory.
To quantify gaming supply levels, a review of all competitive gaming
facilities is performed. Once the market’s supply level is known, an
analysis of the demand for gaming facilities is performed.
Unlike traditional economic models of supply and demand, the price variable associated with gaming is largely determined by the consumer.
Gaming is an intangible product: the consumer is purchasing the “experience” and “excitement” casino gaming offers. The price that the
consumer is willing to pay for this experience is known as the “win,” and is quantified on a per-unit basis known as the “win per unit per
day” (WPUPD). Research indicates that the WPUPD, or the price a market can bear for gaming activity, is highly correlated to the level
of available gaming inventory. The actual WPUPD attained by a market, say $100 per gaming position, and provides an indication of the
marketwide demand for gaming. As will be further discussed, these demand levels within a market can be estimated through an analysis of
the actual WPUPD attained by the market. Historical fluctuations in the marketwide WPUPD at various levels of supply can provide insight
into the future demand for gaming. Further impacting the demand for gaming facilities in the market are current and projected trends in
economic and demographic factors such as population base, employment, disposable income levels, and visitation statistics. In addition,
seasonal fluctuations must be taken into consideration when analyzing demand trends.
Once the various demand trends have been identified, a variety of analytical methodologies may be employed to forecast gaming revenue
for an overall market or an individual property.
43
Gaming Supply Analysis
The following table presents an overview of the competitive themed Casino Resort properties as of year-end 2014 operating within the Las
Vegas Strip submarket. These properties contained 33,505 gaming devices and 1,979 table games.
COMPETITIVE SUMMARY
CASINO OWNER ROOMS
CASINO
SQUARE FOOTAGE
CASINO SF
PER ROOM
GAMING
DEVICES
TABLE
GAMES
SLS Las Vegas Stockbridge 1,613 54,000 33.5 806 77
The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas Blackstone Group 2,960 110,000 37.2 1,360 124
Bally’s Casino Resort Caesars Entertainment 2,814 66,187 23.5 999 58
Bellagio MGM Resorts International 3,933 159,734 40.6 1,977 110
Caesars Palace Caesars Entertainment 3,340 136,573 40.9 1,265 98
Aria MGM Resorts International 4,004 200,544 50.1 1,726 101
Excalibur MGM Resorts International 3,991 89,074 22.3 1,202 72
Flamingo Hilton Caesars Entertainment 3,565 61,000 17.1 1,100 100
Harrah’s Las Vegas Caesars Entertainment 2,526 90,041 35.6 1,206 85
Luxor MGM Resort International 4,408 100,000 22.7 1,250 75
Mandalay Bay MGM Resort International 4,332 160,344 37.0 1,500 90
MGM Grand MGM Resort International 5,001 161,675 32.3 1,850 98
Mirage MGM Resort International 3,044 95,900 31.5 1,760 80
Monte Carlo MGM Resort International 3,213 102,207 31.8 1,400 55
New York-New York MGM Resort International 2,024 64,269 31.8 1,350 51
Palace Station Station Casinos 1,028 84,000 81.7 1,713 37
Palms George Maloof 703 55,689 79.2 1,317 45
Paris Caesars Entertainment 2,916 95,195 32.6 1,014 77
Planet Hollywood Caesars Entertainment 2,496 116,000 46.5 1,095 71
Riviera Riviera Holding Corp. 2,072 103,800 50.1 1,000 30
Treasure Island Phil Ruffin 2,885 55,680 19.3 1,335 61
Tropicana Resort and Casino Onex Corp. 1,878 62,011 33.0 892 40
Venetian/Palazzo Las Vegas Sands, Inc. 7,095 138,684 19.5 2,287 185
Wynn/Encore Wynn Resorts 4,750 109,900 23.1 2,101 159
TOTAL 76,591 2,362,607 30.8 33,505 1,979
44
Gaming Demand Analysis
The win per unit per day (WPUPD) statistic provides the basis for the analysis and projection of table game and gaming device revenues.
WPUPD is calculated by dividing total gaming revenues generated by a particular type of gaming unit by the number of gaming units
available. Overall, the market for gaming devices exhibited high levels of demand and absorption as evidenced by increasing WPUPD and
overall win levels during periods of increasing inventory.
The following exhibit summarizes the strong performance of the Strip gaming market within the industry standard “Casinos earning $72M
and Over”.
LAS VEGAS STRIP $72 MILLION AND OVER GAMING DEVICES
YEAR WIN (000S) % CHANGE UNITS % CHANGE WPUPD % CHANGE
1 1996 $1,442,375 --- 37,197 --- $106 ---
2 1997 1,486,193 3.0 39,033 4.9 $104 (1.5)
3 1998 1,719,351 15.7 45,078 15.5 $104 0.2
4 1999 1,928,428 12.2 47,962 6.4 $110 5.4
5 2000 2,107,673 9.3 50,203 4.7 $115 4.1
6 2001 2,055,412 (2.5) 47,175 (6.0) $119 4.1
7 2002 2,111,912 2.7 47,181 0.0 $123 2.7
8 2003 2,160,261 2.3 43,787 (7.2) $135 10.2
9 2004 2,535,568 17.4 44,989 2.7 $154 13.9
10 2005 2,789,933 10.0 43,377 (3.6) $176 14.4
11 2006 3,059,179 9.7 41,753 (3.7) $201 13.9
12 2007 3,142,884 2.7 40,049 (4.1) $215 7.1
13 2008 2,850,965 (9.3) 40,153 0.3 $194 (9.8)
14 2009 2,495,093 (12.5) 39,288 (2.2) $174 (10.3)
15 2010 2,437,193 (2.3) 38,032 (3.2) $176 0.9
16 2011 2,483,244 1.9 36,685 (3.5) $185 5.6
17 2012 2,553,266 2.8 35,452 (3.4) $197 6.1
18 2013 2,593,138 1.6 34,589 (2.4) $205 4.4
19 2014 2,546,721 (1.8) 33,504 (3.1) $208 1.4
AVG. ANNUAL % CHANGE 3.2 (0.6) 3.8
Source: Las Vegas Gaming Control Board
45
Gaming Demand Analysis
Demand for gaming can be classified into four primary sources: the leisure segment, local residents, tour and travel groups and convention
demand.
LEISURE DEMAND
Leisure visitation to Las Vegas is enormous with visitors taking advantage of the year-round favorable climate and multitude of attractions.
The leisure segment utilizes both table games and gaming devices and has a higher propensity to play table games than other segments.
According to the Las Vegas Convention Authority Visitors Profile Study, in 2014 approximately 47% of all visitors mentioned vacation or
pleasure, up significantly from 41% in 2013. Of those polled, 71% of all visitors said they gambled while in Las Vegas with an average
gambling budget of $530.
LOCAL DEMAND
Local demand plays a part in gaming revenue contribution to the Las Vegas market. However, the local segment’s impact on the Las Vegas
Strip is moderate. According to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, 13% of locals gamble on the Strip with 45% gambling at
least once per week and 75% gambling at least once per month.
TOUR AND TRAVEL DEMAND
Las Vegas welcomed a record 41.1 million visitors in 2014, an all time record. Las Vegas tourism generates more than $45 billion in economic
impact for the local economy and supports 376,000 local jobs. Las Vegas is recognized worldwide as a premier gaming destination. From
traditional card and dice games, to slot machines and race and sports book betting, the casino industry has flourished and evolved into
an international phenomenon. A significant portion of the visitor revenue generated in the city is attributed to the gaming industry, which
posted $9.6 billion in revenue in 2014.
CONVENTION DEMAND
Convention demand within the Las Vegas market is significant. Las Vegas was the most popular trade destination (with a 25% market
share of the Trade Show Week 200 Shows in terms of net square footage) and third most popular convention destination in the nation. In
1990, approximately 1.7 million persons attended trade shows and conventions in Las Vegas; In 2014, convention attendance was up to 5.2
million, an increase of 8% annually over the last 25 years. Future convention expansion in demand is anticipated to see these rates of growth
continue for the foreseeable future.
46
Multifamily Housing and Condominium Overview
With an increase in demand for luxury living accommodations in Las Vegas and a 100% sell out of the existing supply of recently delivered
residential units, condominium prices have increased dramatically. The depth of demand far exceeds the amount of new supply forecasted
over the next five years. In addition, the economies of scale associated with new residential, retail, hotel and office development on the Las
Vegas Strip will only elevate the overall appeal of Strip living - and in turn push condominium values higher.
THE RESIDENCES AT MANDARIN ORIENTAL
3740 S. Las Vegas Blvd
DEVELOPER:
MGM Resorts
SUBMARKET:
The Strip
YEAR BUILT/SELLOUT: 2009
NUMBER OF HOMES: 225
STATUS TYPE SIZE SF LIST PRICE LIST PSF SALE DATE SOLD PRICE SOLD PSF HOA FEES
ACTIVE 3-BED/3-BATHS 3,922 $5,950,000 $1,517 - - - $3,173
ACTIVE 2-BED/2-BATHS 2,998 $3,300,000 $1,101 - - - $2,765
ACTIVE 2-BED/2-BATHS 2,998 $2,799,888 $934 - - $2,535
SOLD 3-BED/3-BATHS 5,628 $5,400,000 $959 3/23/15 $5,400,000 $959 $5,628
SOLD 3-BED/3-BATHS 3,922 $4,750,000 $1,211 5/20/15 $3,875,000 $988 $3,344
SOLD 3-BED/3-BATHS 3,980 $3,975,000 $999 3/31/15 $3,800,000 $955 $3,386
SOLD 2-BED/2-BATHS 2,755 $3,400,000 $1,234 5/20/15 $3,400,000 $1,234 $2,512
SOLD 2-BED/2-BATHS 2,755 $2,900,000 $1,053 12/31/14 $2,900,000 $1,053 $2,575
47
Multifamily Housing and Condominium Overview
VEER TOWERS
3722 S. Vegas Blvd
DEVELOPER:
MGM Resprts Internationa
SUBMARKET:
The Strip
YEAR BUILT/SELLOUT: 2010
NUMBER OF HOMES: 674
STATUS TYPE SIZE SF LIST PRICE LIST PSF SALE DATE SOLD PRICE SOLD PSF HOA FEES
ACTIVE 3-BED/3-BATHS 3328 $2,995,000 $900 - - - $2,053
PANORAMA TOWERS
4525 Dean Martin Dr
DEVELOPER:
Laurence Hallier
SUBMARKET:
Off Strip
YEAR BUILT/SELLOUT: 2006
NUMBER OF HOMES: 2006
STATUS TYPE SIZE SF LIST PRICE LIST PSF SALE DATE SOLD PRICE SOLD PSF HOA FEES
ACTIVE 3-BED/3-BATHS 4,820 $2,950,000 $612 - - - $3,120
ACTIVE 2-BED/2-BATHS 3,414 $2,199,000 $644 - - - $2,116
48
Multifamily Housing and Condominium Overview
TRUMP TOWERS
2000 Fashion Show Drive
DEVELOPER:
Donald Trump
SUBMARKET:
The Strip
YEAR BUILT/SELLOUT: 2008
NUMBER OF HOMES: 430
STATUS TYPE SIZE SF LIST PRICE LIST PSF SALE DATE SOLD PRICE SOLD PSF HOA FEES
ACTIVE 3-BED/3-BATHS 3340 $3,350,000 $1,003 - - - $2,877
ACTIVE 3-BED/3-BATHS 3329 $2,099,000 $631 - - - $3,038
49
50
Las Vegas Retail Market
Overview
The Las Vegas Strip has historically outperformed competitive U.S. retail markets and continues to experience very strong absorption of
new construction, low vacancy rates, and an abundance of retail tenants seeking to access high-traffic pedestrian locations. These factors
together with controlled levels of new development will cause significant long-term rent increases across the submarket.
Increasing Levels of Visitor Spending – More than half of the 41 million visitors to Las Vegas each year spend time shopping along the Las
Vegas Strip. Average per capita visitor spending on shopping, dining and entertainment during 2014 was $815. As demonstrated in the
exhibit below, consumers are allocating a larger percentage of their total spending on shopping and entertainment.
ECONOMIC VISITOR PROFILE 2008 – 2014
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Average number of adults in immediate Party 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4
Proportion of visitors with persons under 21 in their immediate party 6.0% 8.0% 7.0% 10.0% 11.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Proportion of visitors who stayed overnight 99.6% 99.8% 99.3% 99.8% 99.7% 99.8% 99.6%
Days stayed (average) 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.3 4.2
Nights stayed (average) 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.2
Proportion of visitors who stayed in a hotel or motel room 94.0% 96.0% 95.0% 95.0% 96.0% 96.0% 96.0%
Number of room occupants 2.1 2.1 2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1
Lodging expenditures (average per night) $101.68 $75.78 $79.64 $84.04 $93.13 $83.62 $86.55
Proportion of visitors who bought a package or travel group trip 15.0% 15.0% 16.0% 18.0% 14.0% 13.0% 18.0%
Average cost of package per person $746.69 $640.29 $651.02 $757.83 $743.65 $868.24 $815.14
Average trip expenditures of food and drink $273.39 $250.32 $256.82 $274.69 $256.11 $278.95 $281.88
Average trip expenditures for local transportation $59.26 $53.31 $62.87 $64.25 $57.77 $59.68 $68.83
Average trip expenditures for shopping $121.90 $101.97 $122.80 $129.34 $149.29 $140.90 $149.77
Average trip expenditures for shows $51.64 $39.87 $49.28 $47.52 $42.89 $38.45 $47.56
Average trip expenditures for sightseeing $7.12 $5.77 $7.21 $10.24 $9.63 $9.29 $14.49
Average trip gambling budget $531.98 $481.57 $466.20 $447.63 $484.70 $529.57 $530.11
51
The Strip contains some of the highest visitor counts and retail sales per square
foot in the world. High profile retail properties that would compete with a
future luxury or lifestyle retail development at the Site are summarized below.
Located just south of the Site, Town Square Las Vegas contains a world-class
902,000 square-foot regional lifestyle center anchored by Apple, AMC Cinemas,
Whole Foods, H&M, Old Navy, Staples, Guitar Center and a recently opened
Saks Off Fifth Avenue.
Fashion Show Mall, a ±1.9 million square-foot regional mall, is located at the
northwest corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Sands Avenue. It underwent a $1
billion expansion and renovation in 2003. Anchors at this high-end fashion mall
include Neiman-Marcus, Nordstrom, Saks, Robinson-May, Dillard’s, Macy’s
and Bloomingdales Home.
Built in 1992, Forum Shops contains ±510,000 square feet. Major tenants
include Niketown and high-end fashion houses such as Hugo Boss, Armani,
Burberry, Christian Dior, Ferragamo, and Valentino.
The Grand Canal Shoppes at The Venetian is located on the second floor of the
Venetian Hotel. Built in 1999, this mall contains ±500,000 square feet. It also
features specialty shops such as St. John, Cannaletto, Sephora, Ann Taylor,
and Bebe. The Palazzo resort opened in early 2008 and The Shoppes contain
over 50 international boutiques and is anchored by Barneys New York. Other
boutiques include Coach, Ralph Lauren, Burberry, and Christian Louboutin.
The newest addition to the retail sector is the Crystals Shopping Center which
is located in the City Center Development.
52
Opened in 2013, The Linq is owned by Caesars Entertainment and is Las Vegas’
newest dining, shopping, and entertainment district. The focal point is the High
Roller, a 550-foot observation wheel -- the tallest in the world -- offering 360 degree
views of the Las Vegas valley. This high-energy marketplace offers approximately
40 shops and restaurants in a 200,000-square-foot area. Restaurants and nightlife
includes: O’Shea’s Casino, Chayo Cocina, Off the Strip Bistro, Purple Zebra,
Sprinkles Cupcakes, Starbucks, Ghiradelli, Yard House, Tilted Kilt and Flour &
Barley. Shops include The Polaroid Museum, Pier 30, Koto, Bella Scarpa, 12A.M.
Run, Chilli Beans, Goorin Bros., Kitson and Ruby Blue. The LINQ Promenade also
features Brooklyn Bowl, a music venue that holds a capacity of 2,000-plus concert
goers. Brooklyn Bowl has a restaurant, 32 bowling lanes, a section to watch sports
during the day, nightly live performances and a nightclub area.
The Crystals Shopping Center includes high end stores such as Blvgari, Cartier,
Christian Dior, Fendi, Gucci, Harry Winston, Hermes and Jimmy Choo. Crystals
houses over 41 retailers and six restaurants.
The Cosmopolitan opened in December 2010 and contains approximately 38,000
square feet of retail space. The Cosmopolitan retail offers more than 60 specialty
shops and boutiques including AllSaints, Spitafields, Beckley, CRSVR Sneaker
Boutique, DNA 2050, Droog, Molly Brown’s Swimwear, Monogram, Retrospecs &
Co., Skins 612 Cosmetics, Stitched, and Vitals. Retail and entertainment attractions
include a number of clubs.
53
Global Retail Location
The Site’s location on Las Vegas Boulevard
is one of the most highly trafficked shopping
and entertainment districts in the world.
Las Vegas’ unique shopping experience is
an integral component of its international
identity as a premier entertainment and resort
destination. Significant increases in tourism
and exciting new resort developments are
attracting new retailers from around the
globe.
Strong Growth in Tourism and Conventions
– Las Vegas tourism and local residents
generate retail revenues exceeding $15
billion per year within a 5-mile radius of the
Site. The Strip is as an increasingly popular
destination for family-oriented and middlemarket
vacations as well as the nation’s most
preferred location for conventions and trade
shows. During 2015, Las Vegas will attract
over 42 million visitors and nearly 5 million
convention attendees.
Strong Retail Trade Potential – As
demonstrated in the exhibit below, the Site
provides significant retail trade potential
within a 1-, 3- and 5-mile radius of the location.
54
RETAIL TRADE POTENTIAL
1.0 MILE 3.0 MILES 5.0 MILES
Total Retail Potential $1,493,433,472 $7,414,447,521 $15,213,795,034
Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers $23,288,030 $323,988,797 $1,796,642,859
Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores $14,207,613 $86,794,421 $205,922,033
Electronics & Appliances Stores $16,175,555 $185,460,629 $461,963,988
Building Material, Garden Equipment Stores $21,169,480 $304,309,823 $566,970,483
Food & Beverage Stores $36,293,886 $341,682,473 $946,812,080
Health & Personal Care Stores $44,228,545 $191,845,413 $476,522,802
Gasoline Stations $29,830,182 $288,545,852 $591,613,648
Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores $434,856,181 $1,434,339,776 $2,325,409,263
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, Music Stores $11,921,901 $83,396,033 $226,418,173
General Merchandise Stores $169,718,694 $909,634,225 $1,903,876,680
Miscellaneous Store Retailers $65,322,811 $256,587,817 $519,998,572
Foodservice & Drinking Places $526,781,823 $1,595,920,727 $2,437,743,867
Under Construction Entertainment Destinations Drive Retail Demand – In addition to mega projects completed in the past few years such as
City Center and Crystals, new projects under construction surrounding the Site will significantly increase pedestrian traffic in the immediate
area. Situated within two block of the Site, MGM’s The Lot, AEG’s The Arena, and Mandalay Bay’s Convention Center expansion will draw
hundreds of thousands of pedestrian foot traffic to the immediate area. Additionally, there are over 450,000 square feet of new lifestyle retail
in planning at Tropicana and Las Vegas Boulevard with the Shops at Tropicana and Excalibur.
Expanding Pedestrian Synergies Between New Retail – The Crystals at CityCenter to the north and the Town Square Las Vegas to the south
have expanded the retail inventory within three blocks of the Site. Each of the retail projects is a Strip-accessible development, encouraging
greater levels of pedestrian traffic along Las Vegas Boulevard. Retailers located within these two projects include: Apple, H&M, Prada,
Gucci, Versace, Tom Ford, Mikimoto, Balenciaga, Wolfgang Puck (2 locations), Katana, Louis Vuitton, Zegna, Rolex and Tiffany & Co.
Strong Residential Demand on the Strip Resort Corridor – The Resort Corridor contains the largest concentration of recent vertical high-rise
developments in the nation with approximately 10,000 new residences within one mile of the Site. The amenity base on Las Vegas Boulevard
has established the Strip as a preferred location for residents.
55
2. Mandalay Bay Place 5. The Forum Shops at Caesars
8. Fashion Show Mall
3. Crystals at CityCenter
4. Miracle Mile Shops
6. Grand Canal Shoppes / 6. The Shoppes at the Palazzo
56
Competitive Retail Rent Survey
1. TOWN SQUARE LAS VEGAS
Town Square Las Vegas contains a worldclass
902,335 square-foot regional lifestyle
center anchored by AMC Cinemas, Whole
Foods, H&M, Container Store, Gameworks,
Old Navy, Staples, Guitar Center and a
recently opened Saks Off Fifth Avenue. In
addition, Town Center Las Vegas includes
approximately 243,000 square feet of Class A
office space. The property is approximately
90% occupied with retail rents ranging from
$40 to $80 per square foot. Tenant sales
are reported to range from $400 to $600 per
square foot.
2. MANDALAY PLACE
Mandalay Place was completed in 2003 and
is comprised of a 90,000-square-foot unthemed
retail center that spans between
Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino and Luxor.
The property is currently 95% occupied with
rents ranging from $60 to $90 per square foot.
The center has an array of shops including
Nike Golf, Urban Outfitters and Fredrick’s
of Hollywood. Tenant sales are reported to
range from $500 to $600 per square foot.
3.CRYSTALS AT CITYCENTER
Opened in 2009, Crystals at CityCenter is
situated on a 67-acre site at the southwest
corner of Las Vegas Boulevard South and
Harmon Avenue. With over 425,000 square
feet of luxury and boutique shopping space,
Crystals is the retail anchor of CityCenter’s
first phase. A select list of world-class
retailers at Crystals includes Emilio Pucci,
DKNY, Stella McCartney, Assouline, Bally,
Bottega Cucinelli, Bulgari, Cartier, Christian
Dior, Ermenegildo Zegna, Fendi, Gucci,
Hermès, Ilori, Kiton, Louis Vuitton, Marni,
Mikimoto, Prada, Tiffany & Co., Versace,
and Yves Saint Laurent. Crystal’s mantra is
“Shopping.Dining.Nightlife,” and it offers
some of the Strip’s premier restaurants and
nightclubs including Mastro’s Ocean Club,
Wolfgang Puck, Beso Steakhouse, The Cup,
The Pods, Social House, Todd English P.U.B.,
and Eve the nightclub. Crystals at CityCenter
reported sales ranging from $900 to $1,500
per square foot with rental rates that range
from $90 to $120 per square foot.
4. MIRACLE MILE SHOPS
Miracle Mile Shops contains 489,671 square
feet and are located at the northeast corner
of Las Vegas Boulevard and Harmon Avenue.
After Forum Shops and Grand Canal, this
was the third major specialty retail project
to open on the Strip and is contained within
the Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino.
Miracle Mile Shops boasts a 1.2-mile retail/
entertainment complex with modernized
storefronts, people movers, a backlit-sidewalk
water feature, LED video screens, crystal
chandeliers and contemporary, color-coded
kiosks. The center features 170 specialty
stores including Urban Outfitters, Ben
Sherman, Quiksilver, bebe, Sephora, French
Connection, Betsy Johnson, Frederick’s of
Hollywood, H&M and True Religion Brand
Jeans. The property supports 15 restaurants,
including Aromi D’Italia, Cabo Wabo Cantina,
Pampas Churrascaria Brazilian Grille, La
Salsa Cantina, Cheeseburger Las Vegas and
Blondies Sports Bar & Grill. Miracle Mile
Shops is currently 93% leased with tenant
sales levels ranging from $800 to $900 per
square foot with rents ranging from $65 to
$85 per square foot.
57
5. FORUM SHOPS AT CAESARS PALACE
Forum Shops at Caesars Palace, originally
constructed in 1992 and expanded in phases
during 1997 and 2004, was the first major
specialty retail development on Las Vegas
Boulevard. Forum Shops has a prominent
position on the Strip, situated on the west
side of Las Vegas Boulevard, north of
Flamingo Road, between Caesars Palace
and The Mirage, and is configured with a
highly “themed” retail and entertainment
environment. The property is 99% leased,
attracting an estimated 22 million visitors
per year and is generally considered the
most dominant retail center on the Strip
with 150 specialty tenants that include
Anthropologie, Jimmy Choo, Coach, Louis
Vuitton, Montblanc, John Varvatos, Victoria’s
Secret, Versace, Bvlgari, Cartier, De Beers,
Harry Winston, Tiffany & Co., Abercrombie
& Fitch, Armani Exchange, Brooks Brothers,
Zegna and Cheesecake Factory. Tenant
sales at Forum Shops at Ceasars Palace are
approximately $1,000 to $1,200 per square
foot with average rents ranging from $100 to
$125 per square foot.
6.THE GRAND CANAL SHOPPES
Opened in 1999, the Grand Canal Shoppes
at the Venetian was fully leased after three
months. Fashioned after the Forum Shops,
the property is heavily themed with a canal
flowing through the middle of the concourse
area. The property consists of 536,890 square
feet including mezzanine spaces with current
rents ranging from $85 to $110 per square
foot. Average tenant sales range from $900
to $950 per square foot, and as a result of
the project’s immediate success, a second
phase connected via pedestrian bridge to
the Palazzo Resort was recently developed
and dubbed Shoppes at Palazzo. The project
is currently 94% leased and includes key
tenants; Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, bebe,
Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf, Cache, Sephora
and Valentino.
7.THE SHOPPES AT PALAZZO
Delivered in 2007 with a Grand Opening
in January 2008, the 363,714-square-foot
Shoppes at Palazzo is situated within the
Palazzo Resort and is an expansion of the
highly successful Grand Canal Shoppes. The
Shoppes at Palazzo is a three-story enclosed
specialty center with heavily themed,
decorative characteristics intended to capture
the essence of Italy. The center is anchored
by Las Vegas’ first Barneys New York and
features many premier luxury brands
including Jimmy Choo, Burberry, Van Cleef
& Arpels and Piaget. Upscale restaurants
include Emeril Lagasse’s Table 10, Wolfgang
Puck’s Cut and Shimon Bokovza’s Sushi
Samba. The center is currently 89% occupied
with tenant sales ranging from $900 to $925
per square foot and rents ranging from $80
to $100 per square foot.
8. FASHION SHOW MALL
Fashion Show Mall, originally developed in
1981, was expanded in two phases during
2002 and 2003 to its current size of 1.9 million
square feet. The property has a significant
presence along the Strip, with a 600-foot
canopy structure shading the outdoor
plaza area fronting Las Vegas Boulevard.
The project includes seven department
store anchors including Nordstrom,
Bloomingdale’s, Macy’s and Neiman
Marcus, as well as 250 specialty stores and
restaurants. Fashion Show Mall reports
tenant sales ranging from $802 to $983 per
square foot and average rents ranging from
$80 to $88 per square foot.
58
CompetitiveRetail Rent Survey
NO. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ANCHOR TENANTS
1 Town Square
Las Vegas Blvd. & 215
Las Vegas, NV
2 Mandalay Bay Place
Las Vegas Blvd. & Tropicana
Las Vegas, NV
3 Crystals at CityCenter
Las Vegas Blvd. S of Harmon
Las Vegas, NV
4 Miracle Mile Shops
Las Vegas Blvd. & Harmon
Las Vegas, NV
5 Forum Shops at Caesars
Las Vegas Blvd. N of Flamingo
Las Vegas, NV
6 The Grand Canal Shoppes
3377 Las Vegas Blvd.
S Las Vegas, NV
7 The Shoppes at the Palazzo
3327 Las Vegas Blvd.
S Las Vegas, NV
8 Fashion Show Mall
3200 Las Vegas Boulevard
S. Las Vegas, NV
Sub-Type: Lifestyle Center
Year Built: 2008
Total GLA: 900,000
Sub-Type: Specialty Center
Year Built: 2003
Total GLA: 90,000
Sub-Type: Specialty Center
Year Built: 2009
Total GLA: 360,000
Year Built: 2000
Expansion: 2007
Renovation: 2008
Total GLA: 490,000
Sub-Type: Specialty Center
Year Built: 1992
Expansion: 1997
Rennovation: 2004
Total GLA: 650,000
Sub-Type: Specialty Center
Year Built: 1999
Total GLA: 500,000
Sub-Type: Specialty Center
Total GLA: 320,000
Anchor GLA: 85,000
Anchor Ratio: 27%
Sub-Type: Super Regional Center
Year Built: 1981
Expansion: 1993 and 2002
Renovation: 2002
Total GLA: 1,868,219
Anchor GLA: 1,259,154
Anchor Ratio: 67%
RENT/SF
IN-LINE SHOP
SALES/SF
VACANCY
Saks, Whole Foods, Apple $40 - $80 $400 -$600 10.0%
Retail bridge between Mandalay & Luxor
with shops, restaurants
Upscale specialty retail project on Las
Vegas Blvd. in CityCenter
$60 - $90 $500 -$600 5.0%
$90 - $120 $900 -$1,500 12.0%
Specialty retail center at Planet Hollywood $65 - $85 $800 -$900 7.0%
Upscale/themed retail project at Caesars $100 - $125 $1,000 -$1,200 1.0%
Upscale/themed retail project at The
Venetian
$85 - $110 $900 -$950 6.0%
Barney’s New York $80 - $100 $900 -$925 11.0%
Dillard’s, Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus, Saks
Fifth Avenue, Macy’s-North, Forever 21
$80 - $100 $800 -$1,000 4.0%
59
Retail Construction on Las Vegas Boulevard
The following table summarizes the retail construction on the Las Vegas Strip since 2000.
PROPERTY ADDRESS / LOCATION RENTABLE STATUS
2000 Construction
Miracle Mile Shops (Desert Passage -
Rebranded)
3667 Las Vegas Boulevard 490,000 Complete
Showcase Mall Phase II 3785 Las Vegas Boulevard 40,000 Complete
TOTAL 530,000
2002 Construction
Fashion Show Mall Expansion Phase I 3200 Las Vegas Boulevard 450,000 Complete
TOTAL 450,000
2003 Construction
Boulevard Collection Las Vegas Boulevard @ Sahara 50,000 Complete
Mandalay Place 3950 Las Vegas Boulevard 90,000 Complete
TOTAL 140,000
2004 Construction
Fashion Show Mall Expansion Phase II 3200 Las Vegas Boulevard 609,500 Complete
Hawaiian Marketplace 3742 Las Vegas Boulevard 80,000 Complete
Forum Shops at Caesars Palace Phase III 3500 Las Vegas Boulevard 167,000 Complete
TOTAL 856,500
2007 Construction
The Shoppes at Palazzo 3325 Las Vegas Boulevard 364,000 Complete
Town Square Las Vegas Las Vegas Blvd @ I-215 925,000 Complete
TOTAL 1,289,000
2009 Construction
Crystals at CityCenter E Harmon Ave @ Las Vegas Blvd 425,000 Complete
Showcase Mall III Las Vegas Blvd @ Tropicana Ave 97,320 Complete
TOTAL 522,320
60
PROPERTY ADDRESS / LOCATION RENTABLE STATUS
2010 Construction
Cosmopolitan Las Vegas Blvd @ Flamingo Rd 38,000 Complete
TOTAL 38,000
2012 Construction
Harmon Corner 3717 S Las Vegas Boulevard 110,184 Complete
TOTAL 110,184
2014 Construction
The Linq Las Vegas Blvd @ Caesars Palace Dr. 300,000 Complete
TOTAL 300,000
2015 Construction
Shops at TI Las Vegas Blvd @ Spring Mountain Rd 48,000 Complete
Grand Bazaar Shops Las Vegas Blvd @ Flamingo Rd 26,500 Complete
TOTAL 74,500
Under Construction and Planned
Alon Las Vegas Blvd @ Riviera Blvd 100,000 Under Construction
ResortWorld Las Vegas Blvd @ Desert Inn Rd 200,000 Under Construction
Shops at Excalibur Las Vegas Blvd @ Tropicana 300,000 Planned
Shops at Tropicana Las Vegas Blvd @ Tropicana 350,000 Planned
TOTAL 950,000
TOTAL COMPLETED (SF) 5,260,504
TOTAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION (SF) 300,000
61
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011456.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

153
H3VOGIU3

executing the orders for Ms. Maxwell, and it's not part of a

fantastical conspiracy.

All we want to do is have the jury hear this
information. We've provided in our brief very specific support

for each of the questions that we want to ask. We think it's

entirely appropriate that the jury hear what these two have to

say.

=

THE COURT: Thank you.

Where are we now? Yes.

MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, by my estimation, we have

one motion left, which is 665 with the opening brief.

2

THE COURT: And what's that?

MS. MENNINGER: It was our motion to prohibit

questioning of our client regarding her consensual adult sexual
activities.

THE COURT: ‘Yes.

MS. MENNINGER: Do I take that as a go ahead and talk

Or o-

lial

|e

COURT: No.

MS. MENNINGER: Okay. I wasn't sure.

THI

Gl

COURT: Yes, well, I can understand.
How can you possibly know what we're going to do when

I don't know what we're going to do?

MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I'm happy to defer this

issue. I believe it is somewhat --

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011456
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026396.txt,"I found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a
cultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but
it seems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very
intricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works
layer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to
train in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low
level learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child
development, that have famously been described by Piaget.

The first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The
switching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other
apes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are
mature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit
faster. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and
socially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even
after controlling for family income.

Gorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4
years. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains
have the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally
smarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they
can perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them.

The second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention
to, by giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual
will find mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. Ifa brain gets lots of rewards for discovering
other people's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition.

Language might be the result of three things that are different in humans:

- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of
phonemes or the first language)

- more layers

- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us
like music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves
understood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own.

This is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for
instance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same
group, slower development often indicates defects, of course.)

Another support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and
auditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into
their current photo app:
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/07/01/google-mistakenly-tags-black-people-as-gorillas-showing-limits-of-

algorithms/

The state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to ""Imagine"" things. I.e. when the
experimenter asks the system to ""dream"" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat
compelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody
could do a few months ago:
http://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026396
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028601.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 1/26/2019 5:56:07 PM
Subject: Re: Re:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp6-Y6IHECo please watch with the eys that 1 have opened for you.

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 6:32 PM Weingarten, Reid _ wrote:
Cal me if you get a chance...

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

If he wants you to rep him. YES

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:34 PM Weingarten, Reid SF a wrote:

Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: J

Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re: Re:

im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve it
by end of month. .

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:47 PM Weingarten, Reid i. wrote:

Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise | will imagine the worst....

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gqmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM

To: Weingarten, Reid
Subject: Re: Re:

i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but ,,,

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:40 PM Weingarten, Reid FO wrote:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028601
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010990.txt,"Output:

Physical capital:

Present value rule:

Profit:
Pure consumption:

Rate:

Stock:

Tastes:

Total return rule (or total

return truism):

Transfer in:

Transfer out:

Wage:

Work:

Summary

Creation of wealth, or equivalently of capital of either
factor.

Capital whose outside operating cost does not satisfy
tastes.

Capital of either value is expected cash flow discounted
at our time preference rate.

Output of physical capital.
Same as exhaust.

Quantity measured as a flow over a stock, and
equivalently as a pure number over time.

Quantity measured in dollars alone. Same as capital.
Intentions whose satisfaction terminates capital in
exhaust.

Output equals capital growth plus cash flow.

Value inserted from outside. Same as new investment
from outside.

Value passed out and recovered fully in other assets
rather than exhausted.

Same as pay.

Output of human capital.

When I first thought these foundations through, maybe 25 years ago, I was just as

happy to see that they held so little originality. The vocabulary is about the same as

in Adam Smith, and the three fundamental theorems are well accepted. Any

composer knows that originality should be incidental. Our music says what we think

Chapter 3: Foundations

1/11/16 19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010990
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032210.txt,"From: Multiple Senders [Multiple Senders]
Sent: 4/5/2019 11:06:20 AM

To: jeevacation; live:linkspirit

Subject: live:linkspirit -- 2019/04/05

jeevacation
04/05/2019 10:06:20 AM
which friday ?

jeevacation
04/05/2019 10:06:32 AM
but you can ttravel to me without it ?

jeevacation
04/05/2019 10:06:42 AM
I need your help this week

jeevacation
04/05/2019 12:43:15 PM
https://join.skype.com/invite/j 1rOgO Vxn3fB

jeevacation
04/05/2019 12:43:29 PM
please skype | | meet her today and she might fly with you

jeevacation
04/05/2019 02:34:59 PM
10 minutes

live:linkspirit
04/05/2019 03:17:35 PM
May we call you?

live:linkspirit
04/05/2019 03:39:19 PM
We googled you

jeevacation
04/05/2019 03:39:36 PM
do i look cute

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032210
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010748.txt,"Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 14 of 19

“Alessi Depo. Tr.”) Alessi testified that he saw “many celebrities” at the house... [including] a
very famous lawyer[] that I’m sure you know, Alan Dershowitz, who spend [sic] at the house a
couple times.” (Alessi Depo. Tr. 70, 71.) However, Alessi made no allegations of improprieties
against any of these individuals. Jane Doe #3 asks the Court to infer that because Prof.
Dershowitz was at his client’s home, he must have participated in nefarious activities. In fact,
Prof. Dershowitz’s friendship with Epstein consisted of the exchange of academic and
intellectual ideas. At most, Alessi testified that Prof. Dershowitz visited Epstein’s home and
received a massage from an adult massage therapist, which “was a treat for everybody” at the
Epstein home. (Id. at 74) (“Q. Did [Dershowitz] have massages sometimes when he was there?
A. Yes. A massage was like a treat for everybody. If they want it, we call the massage and they
have a massage.”) Alessi explains that he was referring to massages performed by adult
massage therapists. (Id. at 184) (“Q. All right. And if I understood your testimony is, the ones
the — that is, of the massage therapists as you’ve just described [a hundred, 200 different massage
therapists], you saw some men? A. Yes. Q. You saw more women? A. Yes. Q. And all of the
women, at least from your viewpoint, were 18, 19 or older? A. Yes.”)’

Messrs. Alessi and Rodriguez did not allege that Prof. Dershowitz received a massage
from any underage females, had any physical contact whatsoever with any underage females, or
witnessed anyone engaging in any inappropriate behavior with any underage females.
Additionally, despite their allegations to the contrary, it is clear that previous testimony from
Rodriguez and Alessi does not corroborate Jane Doe #3’s baseless and utterly false affidavit.

(DE 291-1.)

’TIn fact, the only massage Prof. Dershowitz ever received at any of Epstein’s homes was from a
professional massage therapist who was in her 30’s or 40s.
14

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010748
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031719.txt,"always trump an imposed political structure, especially the Western-
exported concept of the nation-state.

Following World War II, as European colonialism waned, the US
assumed a more significant role in the Middle East. US foreign policy
was driven primarily by oil interests, the protection of Israel and
resistance to Soviet aggression. To prevent the region from dissolving
in sectarian conflict, the US established a series of autocracies. The
campaign included restoring the Shah of Iran to the throne after the
democratically elected Mosaddegh regime nationalized oil fields, and
supporting for the Baathist overthrow of the Qasim government in
Iraq, which gave rise to Saddam Hussein.

Following the end of the Cold War, America’s foreign policy gravitated
toward nation building, and the widespread promotion of democracy
and human rights abroad. However, an iron fisted policies the
strongmen imposed to remain in power conflicted with the moral
endeavor to curate democracy afar. Hence, America’s crusade
undermined its original goals by threatening the same autocratic
regimes the US had helped establish.

As the leaders the West once championed are toppled one by one, the
boot-prints of Western Power are clearly visible. Regimes once
supported by the US have fallen, marking the failure of embrace and
abandon. In Egypt, Mubarak was in, then deserted. In Iraq, Hussein
was in, then deposed. In Libya, Gaddafi was in, then overthrown with
US support. In Syria with Assad, it was the same scenario. The
instability created by contradictory Western interests has invited far
worse atrocities by the new regimes than the crimes perpetrated by the
previous order. The massacres in Syria and Iraq are obvious, bitter
examples.

Filling the void are a multitude of warring sectarian groups from ISIS
to Syrian rebels. The factions each generally fight under their own flag
of political Islam. The rise of Islamic factions battling for territory is a

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031719
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021793.txt,"Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

BS Df 24S IS DIS IS 24S BIS DIS BIS iS DIS IC 24K BIS DIS 5S 2S DIS IC OIC BIS DIS DIC 2k DIS Ig 24K BIS DIC 3IC DiC DIS ik DIC BIC DIC DIS DiC DIC ik 24S SOIR FIC DI DIC 2k OIC iS 2IC IC 2c IC 2k 2I6 ik 2k ic

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021793
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025847.txt,"confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and 1s intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025847
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026907.txt,"whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. This material is a solicitation of derivatives business
generally, only for the purposes of, and to the extent it would otherwise be subject to, §§ 1.71 and 23.605 of the U.S.
Commodity Exchange Act.

Currencies. Currency exchange rates can be extremely volatile, particularly during times of political or economic
uncertainty. There is a risk of loss when an investor has exposure to foreign currency or is in foreign currency traded
investments.

Australia: This material is being disseminated in Australia by Goldman Sachs & Co (“GSCo’); Goldman Sachs
International (“GSI”); Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte (“GSSP”) and/or Goldman Sachs (Asia) LLC (“GSALLC’). In
Australia, this document, and any access to it, is intended only for a person that has first satisfied Goldman Sachs that:

« The person is a Sophisticated or Professional Investor for the purposes of section 708 of the Corporations Act 2001
(Cth) (“Corporations Act”); or

« The person is a wholesale client for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act.

No offer to acquire any financial product or interest in any securities or interests of any kind is being made to you in this
document. If financial products or interests in any securities or interests of any kind do become available in the future, the
offer may be arranged by an appropriately licensed Goldman Sachs entity in Australia in accordance with section
911A(2)(b) of the Corporations Act. Any offer will only be made in circumstances where disclosures and/or disclosure
statements are not required under Part 6D.2 or Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act (as relevant).

To the extent that any financial service is provided in Australia by GSCo, GSI, GSSP and/or GSALLC, those services are
provided on the basis that they are provided only to “wholesale clients”, as defined for the purposes of the Corporations
Act. GSCo, GSI, GSSP and GSALLC are exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence
under the Corporations Act and do not therefore hold an Australian Financial Services Licence. GSCo is regulated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission under US laws; GSI is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the
Prudential Regulation Authority under laws in the United Kingdom; GSSP is regulated by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore under Singaporean laws; and GSALLC is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission under Hong
Kong laws; all of which differ from Australian laws. Any financial services given to any person by GSCo, GSI, and/or
GSSP in Australia are provided pursuant to ASIC Class Orders 03/1100; 03/1099; and 03/1102 respectively.

Brazil. These materials are provided at your request and solely for your information, and in no way constitutes an offer,
solicitation, advertisement or advice of, or in relation to, any securities, funds, or products by any of Goldman Sachs
affiliates in Brazil or in any jurisdiction in which such activity is unlawful or unauthorized, or to any person to whom it is
unlawful or unauthorized. This document has not been delivered for registration to the relevant regulators or financial
supervisory bodies in Brazil, such as the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (Comissao de Valores
Mobilidrios — CVM) nor has its content been reviewed or approved by any such regulators or financial supervisory bodies.
The securities, funds, or products described in this document have not been registered with the relevant regulators or
financial supervisory bodies in Brazil, such as the CVM, nor have been submitted for approval by any such regulators or
financial supervisory bodies. The recipient undertakes to keep these materials as well as the information contained herein
as confidential and not to circulate them to any third party.

Chile: Fecha de inicio de la oferta: (i) La presente oferta se acoge a la Norma de Caracter General N° 336 de la
Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros de Chile; (ii) La presente oferta versa sobre valores no inscritos en el Registro de
Valores o en el Registro de Valores Extranjeros que lleva la Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros, por lo que los
valores sobre los cuales ésta versa, no estan sujetos a su fiscalizacidn; (iii) Que por tratarse de valores no inscritos, no
existe la obligacién por parte del emisor de entregar en Chile informacién publica respecto de estos alores; y (iv) Estos
valores no podran ser objeto de oferta publica mientras no sean inscritos en el Registro de Valores correspondiente.

Dubai: Goldman Sachs International (“GSI”) is authorised and regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority
(“DFSA’) in the DIFC and the Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority in the UK. Registered address of the
DIFC branch is Level 5, Gate Precinct Building 1, Dubai International Financial Centre, PO Box 506588, Dubai, UAE and
registered office of GSI in the UK is Peterborough Court, 133 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2BB, United Kingdom. This
material is only intended for use by market counterparties and professional clients, and not retail clients, as defined by the
DFSA Rulebook. Any products that are referred to in this material will only be made available to those clients falling within
the definition of market counterparties and professional clients.

Israel: Goldman Sachs is not licensed to provide investment advice or investment management services under Israeli
law.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026907
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024581.txt,"KUE Management

At the conclusion of this offering, the KUE management team will consist of the following
individuals.

Principals

Michael Mifken, Co-Founder and Chairman

Mr. Milken is Co-Founder and Chairman of KUE. One cf America’s leading philanthropists, he was called
“The Man Who Changed Medicine’ in a Fortune magazine cover story that chronicled his three decades
of efforts to accelerate medical solutions. He Co-Founded the Milken Family Foundation in 1982 to
advance programs in medical research and education. In 1993, Mr. Milken expanded his medical
philanthropy by launching the Prosiate Cancer Foundation, the world's largest private source of funding
for research on that disease. A decade later, he concluded that progress wasn’t coming fast enough, so
he founded FasterCures, which seeks to shorten the path to breakthroughs for all deadly diseases. Mr.
Milken also chairs the Milken Institute, a think tank who conferences feature opinion leaders and
government officials from around the world. Among the many awards Mr. Milken has received is the
Marcus Garvey Award for major contributions to the formation and inspiration of African-American
businesses. He earned his bachelor’s degree at the University of California at Berkeley, and his MBA
from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School,

Steven Green, Vice Chairman

Steven Green, who served as the 12th U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Singapore from 1997 to 2001,
is Vice Chairman of KUE and Chairman and CEO of Greenstreet Real Estate Partners, a professional
real estate firm. Ambassador Green previously served as Chairman and CEO of Samsonite Corporation,
which was the major operating subsidiary of Astrum International Corporation. As Chairman of Astrum,
Ambassador Green spearheaded the operating company’s expansion into emerging markets in Eastern
Europe, the CIS, Asia and the Middle East. In 1992, he opened the first American retailing center on Red
Square. In 1995, President Clinton appointed him to the President's Export Council, where he served on
the Executive Committee and chaired the Strategic Communications Committee. Ambassador Green is
also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of K1 Ventures Limited, a publicly traded investment company
in Singapore, and is a board member of Greensireet Realty, a company that manages a large portfolio of
education-related real estate. [In addition to his corporate responsibilities, he has been active in U.S. civic
affairs, serving as a contributing trustee and director for a number of community and national
organizations, including the University of Miami, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and serves as Honorary
Consul General of Singapore in Miami, Florida. The Green Family Foundation endows special projects in
community and national service.

Lowell Milken, Co-Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer

Lowell Milken is President and Chief Executive Officer of KUE. He is also Chairman of London-based
Heron International, a worldwide leader in property development and investment; Chairman of KU
Education, Inc., a leading company in ECE and K-9 educational programs and services; and Chairman
and Co-Founder of the Milken Family Foundation. Under his leadership, the Milken Family Foundation
has become one of the most innovative private foundations in the U.S., developing groundbreaking
programs in K-12 education. Mr. Milken created the Foundation’s National Educator Award program,
which today is the largest teacher-recognition program in the U.S. Dubbed the “Oscars of Teaching” by
Teacher Magazine, it has awarded more than $50 million to honor more than 2,100 K-12 teachers and
principals. Mr. Milken also launched the Teacher Advancement Program (""TAP"") in 1999 as a
comprehensive school reform to attract, develop, motivate and retain high quality teachers for America’s
schools. Today TAP schools are operating in 12 states impacting thousands of teachers and ten of
thousands of students. Mr. Milken serves as Chairman of the Institute for Excellence in Teaching which
among its many activities is the operation of the Teacher Advancement Program. Widely known as an
educational pioneer and innovator, Mr. Milken has been recognized by numerous awards from such

148

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024581
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016916.txt,"To be sure, some recent achievements in artificial intelligence have been
remarkably impressive. Computers can now produce visual artworks and musical
compositions akin to those of recognized masters, creating just the sort of “information”
that Wiener most prized. But by far the largest impact on society to date has come from
the collection and manipulation of Shannon-like information, which has reshaped our
shopping habits, political participation, personal relationships, expectations of privacy,
and more.

What might “deep learning” evolve into, if the fundamental currency becomes
“information” as Wiener defined it? How might the field shift if re-animated by
Wiener’s deep moral convictions, informed as they were by his prescient concerns about
rampant militarism, runaway corporate profit-seeking, the self-limiting features of
secrecy, and the reduction of human expression to interchangeable commodities?
Perhaps “deep learning” might then become the cultivation of meaningful information
rather than the relentless pursuit of potent, if meaningless, bits.

113

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016916
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032916.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 11/14/2016 2:56:18 PM
To: Thomas Jr., Landon
Subject: Re: Trump

Importance: — High

no, they dont have many loyal people that have gravitas. . it will be somewhat random but he is
being advised to do as you suggest but he doesnt like advice in general. hehasno loyalty ZERO _ tossed
christie after being his best friend. in four seconds flat

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon FE ts—i—<‘i‘i‘~S wrote:

do you agree with my thesis?

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
no intel but lots of profits

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon = ssi‘ wrote:
Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in
treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as
some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly
seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for
making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/inde
x.html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032916
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018085.txt,"The

Shimon Post

Presidential Press Bulletin

17 June, 2011

Article 1. | The Guardian
Where the Arab spring will end is anyone's quess
lan Black

Article 2. | Al-Ahram Weekly

Netanyahu and the Arab spring
Abdel-Moneim Said

AnicleS- |The New Yorker
Zawahiri at the Helm
Lawrence Wright

Article 4. NYT

Does Foreign Policy Matter?
Roger Cohen

Article. | Los Angeles Times

European Union: Everywhere you look, a crisis
Timothy Garton Ash

Ancle®- |The American Interest

What Would War with Iran Look Like?
Jeffrey White

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018085
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015501.txt,"﻿Game Theory and Morality
Moshe Hoffman , Erez Yoeli , and Carlos David Navarrete
Introduction
Consider the following puzzling aspects of our morality:
1. Many of us share the view that one should not use people, even if it benefits them
to be used, as Kant intoned in his second formulation of the categorical imperative:
“Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or
in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the
same time as an end” (Kant, 1997 ). Consider dwarf tossing, where dwarfs wearing
protective padding are thrown for amusement, usually at a party or pub. It is
viewed as a violation of dwarfs’ basic dignity to use them as a means for amusement,
even though dwarves willingly engage in the activity for economic gain.
Many jurisdictions ban dwarf tossing on the grounds that the activity violates
dwarfs’ basic human rights, and these laws have withstood lawsuits raised by
dwarfs suing over the loss of employment (!).
2. Charitable giving is considered virtuous, but little attention is paid to how just
the cause or efficient the charity. For example, Jewish and Christian traditions
advocate giving 10 % of one’s income to charity, but make no mention of the
importance of evaluating the cause or avoiding wasteful charities. The intuition
that giving to charity is a moral good regardless of efficacy results in the persistence
of numerous inefficient and corrupt charities. For example, the Wishing
Well Foundation has, for nearly a decade, ranked as one of CharityNavigator.
M. Hoffman (*) • E. Yoeli
Program for Evolutionary Dynamics , Harvard University ,
One Brattle Square, Suite 6 , Cambridge , MA 02138 , USA
e-mail: moshehoffman@fas.harvard.edu
C.D. Navarrete
Department of Psychology, and, the Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior Program ,
Michigan State University , East Lansing , MI , USA
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
T.K. Shackelford, R.D. Hansen (eds.), The Evolution of Morality,
Evolutionary Psychology, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_14
289
290
M. Hoffman et al.
com’s most inefficient charities. Yet its mission of fulfilling wishes by children
with terminal illnesses is identical to that of the more efficient Make-A-Wish
Foundation. Worse yet, scams masquerading as charities persist. One man operating
as The US Navy Veteran’s Association collected over 100 million dollars—
over 7 years!—before anyone bothered to investigate the charity.
3. In every culture and age, injunctions against murder have existed. If there is one
thing much of humanity seems to agree on, it’s that ending the life of another
without just cause which is among the worst of moral violations. Yet cultures
don’t consider the loss of useful life years in their definition, even though it is
relevant to the measure of harm done by the murder. Why is our morality so
much more sensitive to whether a life was lost than to how much life was lost?
There are numerous other examples of how our moral intuitions appear to be rife
with logical inconsistencies. In this chapter, we use game theory to provide insight
on a range of moral puzzles similar to the puzzles described above.
What Is Game Theory and Why Is It Relevant?
In this section , we review the defi nition of a game , and of a Nash equilibrium , then
discuss how evolution and learning processes would yield moral intuitions consistent
with Nash equilibria .
Game theory is a tool for the analysis of social interactions. In a game, the payoff
to each player depends on their actions, as well as the actions of others. Consider
the Prisoner’s Dilemma (Chammah & Rapoport, 1965 ; see Fig. 1 ), a model that
captures the paradox of cooperation. Each of two players chooses whether to cooperate
or to defect. Cooperating reduces a player’s payoff by c > 0 while increasing
the other’s payoffs by b> c. Players could be vampire bats with the option of
sharing blood, or firms with the option of letting each other use their databases, or
premed students deciding whether to take the time to help one another to study. The
payoffs, b and c , may represent likelihood of surviving and leaving offspring, profits,
or chance of getting into a good medical school.
Solutions to such games are analyzed using the concept of a Nash equilibrium 1 —
a specification of each player’s action such that no player can increase his payoff by
deviating unilaterally. In the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the only Nash equilibrium is for
neither player to cooperate, since regardless of what the other player does, cooperation
reduces one’s own payoff.
1
Note that we focus on the concept of Nash equilibrium in this chapter and not evolutionary stable
strategy (ESS), a refinement of Nash that might be more familiar to an evolutionary audience. ESS
are the Nash equilibria that are most relevant in evolutionary contexts. However, ESS is not well
defined in many of our games, so we will focus on the insights garnered from Nash and directly
discuss evolutionary dynamics when appropriate.
Morality Games
291
Fig. 1 The Prisoner’s
Dilemma. Player 1’s available
strategies (C and D, which
stand for cooperate and
defect, respectively) are
represented as rows . Player
2’s available strategies (also
C and D) are represented as
columns . Player 1’s payoffs
are represented at the
intersection of each row and
column. For example, if
player 1 plays D and player 2
plays C, player 1’s payoff is
b. The Nash equilibrium of
the game is (D, D). It is
indicated with a circle
Game theory has traditionally been applied in situations where players are rational
decision makers who deliberately maximize their payoffs, such as pricing
decisions of firms (Tirole, 1988 ) or bidding in auctions (Milgrom & Weber, 1982 ).
In these contexts, behavior is expected to be consistent with a Nash equilibrium,
otherwise one of the agents—who are actively deliberating about what to do—
would realize she could benefit from deviating from the prescribed strategy.
However, game theory also applies to evolutionary and learning processes, where
agents do not deliberately choose their behavior in the game, but play according to
strategies with which they are born, imitate, or otherwise learn. Agents play a game
and then “reproduce” based on their payoffs, where reproduction represents offspring,
imitation, or learning. The new generation then play the game, and so on. In
such settings, if a mutant does better (mutation can be genetic or can happen when
agents experiment), then she is more likely to reproduce or her behavior imitated or
reinforced, causing the behavior to spread. This intuition is formalized using models
of evolutionary dynamics (e.g., Nowak, 2006 ).
The key result for evolutionary dynamic models is that, except under extreme
conditions, behavior converges to Nash equilibria. This result rests on one simple,
noncontroversial assumption shared by all evolutionary dynamics: Behaviors that
are relatively successful will increase in frequency. Based on this logic, game theory
models have been fruitfully applied in biological contexts to explain phenomena
such as animal sex ratios (Fisher, 1958 ), territoriality (Smith & Price, 1973 ), cooperation
(Trivers, 1971 ), sexual displays (Zahavi, 1975 ), and parent–offspring conflict
(Trivers, 1974 ). More recently, evolutionary dynamic models have been applied
in human contexts where conscious deliberation is believed to not play an important
role, such as in the adoption of religious rituals (Sosis & Alcorta, 2003 ), in the
expression and experience of emotion (Frank, 1988 ; Winter, 2014 ), and in the use
of indirect speech (Pinker, Nowak, & Lee, 2008 ).
292
M. Hoffman et al.
Crucially for this chapter, because our behaviors are mediated by moral intuitions
and ideologies, if our moral behaviors converge to Nash, so must the intuitions and
ideologies that motivate them. The resulting intuitions and ideologies will bear
the signature of their game theoretic origins, and this signature will lend clarity on
the puzzling, counterintuitive, and otherwise hard-to-explain features of our moral
intuitions, as exemplified by our motivating examples.
In order for game theory to be relevant to understanding our moral intuitions and
ideologies, we need only the following simple assumption: Moral intuitions and
ideologies that lead to higher payoffs become more frequent . This assumption can
be met if moral intuitions that yield higher payoffs are held more tenaciously, are
more likely to be imitated, or are genetically encoded. For example, if every time
you transgress by commission you are punished, but every time you transgress by
omission you are not, you will start to intuit that commission is worse than
omission.
Rights and the Hawk–Dove Game
In this section we will argue that just as the Hawk –Dove model explains animal territoriality
(Maynard Smith & Price, 1973 , to be reviewed shortly ), the Hawk –Dove
model sheds light onto our sense of rights (Descioli & Karpoff, 2014 ; Gintis, 2007 ;
Myerson, 2004 ).
Let us begin by asking the following question (Myerson, 2004 ): “Why [does] a
passenger pay a taxi driver after getting out of the cab in a city where she is visiting
for one day, not expecting to return?” If the cabby complains to the authorities, the
passenger could plausibly claim that she had paid in cash. The answer, of course, is
that the cabby would feel that the money the passenger withheld was his—that he
had a right to be paid for his service—and get angry, perhaps making a scene or
even starting a fight. Likewise, if the passenger did in fact pay, but the cabby
demanded money a second time, the passenger would similarly be infuriated. This
example illustrates that people have powerful intuitions regarding rightful ownership.
In this section, we explore what the Hawk – Dove game can teach us about our
sense of property rights.
The reader is likely familiar with the Hawk – Dove game, a model of disputes
over contested resources. In the Hawk – Dove game, each player decides whether to
fight over a resource or to acquiesce (i.e. play Hawk or Dove). If one fights and the
other does not, the fighter gets the resource, worth v . If both fight, each pays a cost
c and split the resource. That is, each gets v/2- c. If neither fights, they split the
resource and get v /2. As long as v/2 < c, then in any stable Nash equilibrium, one
player fights and the other acquiesces. That is, if one player expects the other to
fight, she is better off acquiescing, and vice versa (see Fig. 2 ).
Crucially, it is not just a Nash equilibrium for one player to always play Hawk
and the other to always play Dove. It is also an equilibrium for both players to condition
whether they play Hawk on an uncorrelated asymmetry —a cue or event that
Morality Games
293
Fig. 2 The Hawk–Dove
game. The Nash equilibria of
the game are circled
does not necessarily affect the payoffs, but does distinguish between the players,
such as who arrived at the territory first or who built the object. If one conditions on
the event (say, plays Hawk when she arrives first), then it is optimal for the other to
condition on the event (to play Dove when the other arrives first).
As our reader is likely aware, this was the logic provided by Maynard Smith to
explain animal territoriality—why animals behave aggressively to defend territory
that they have arrived at first, even if incumbency does not provide a defensive
advantage and even when facing a more formidable intruder. Over the years, evidence
has amassed to support Maynard Smith’s explanation, such as experimental
manipulation of which animal arrives first (Davies, 1978 ; Sigg & Falett, 1985 ).
Like other animals, we condition how aggressively we defend a resource on
whether we arrive first. Because our behaviors are motivated by beliefs, we are also
more likely to believe that the resource is “ours” when we arrive first. Studies have
shown these effects with children’s judgments of ownership, in ethnographies of
prelegal societies, and in computer games. In one such illustration, DeScioli and
Wilson ( 2011 ) had research subjects play a computer game in which they contested
a berry patch. Subjects who ended up keeping control of the patch usually arrived
first, and this determined the outcome more often than differences in fighting ability
in the game.
This sense of ownership is codified in our legal systems, as illustrated by the quip
“possession is 9/10ths of the law,” and in a study involving famous legal property
cases conducted by Descioli and Karpoff ( 2014 ). In a survey, these researchers
asked participants to identify the rightful owner of a lost item, after reading vignettes
based on famous property rights legal cases. Participants consistently identified the
possessor of the found item as its rightful owner (as the judges had at the time of the
case). This sense of ownership is also codified in our philosophical tradition, e.g., in
Locke ( 1988 ), who found property rights in initial possession. Note that, as has also
been found in animals, possession extends to objects on one’s land: In DeScioli and
294
M. Hoffman et al.
Karpoff’s survey, another dictate of participants’ (and the judges’) property rights
intuitions was who owned the land on which the lost item was found.
Also like animals, our sense of property rights is influenced by who created or
invested in the resource, another uncorrelated asymmetry. In locales that sometimes
grant property rights to squatters—individuals who occupy lands others have purchased—a
key determinant of whether the squatters are granted the land is whether
they have invested in it (Cone vs. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co., 1947 ; Neuwirth,
2005 ). Locke also intuited that investment in land is part of what makes it ours:
In Second Treatise on Civil Government (1689), Locke wrote, “everyman has a
property in his person; this nobody has a right to but himself. The labor of his body
and the work of his hand, we may say, are properly his.”
If the Hawk – Dove model underlies our sense of property rights, we would expect
to see psychological mechanisms that motivate us to feel entitled to an object when
we possess it or have invested in it. Here are three such mechanisms, which can be
seen by reinterpreting some well-documented “biases” in the behavioral economics
literature. The first such bias is the endowment effect : We value items more if we are
in possession of them. The endowment effect has been documented in dozens of
experiments, where subjects are randomly given an item (mug, pen, etc.) and
subsequently state that they are willing to sell the mug for much more than those
who were not given the mug are willing to pay (Kahneman, Knetsch, & Thaler,
1990 ). In the behavioral economics literature, the endowment effect has sometimes
been explained by loss aversion, which is when we are harmed more by a loss than
we benefit from an equivalent gain. However, the source of loss aversion is not
questioned or explained. When it is, loss aversion is also readily explained by the
Hawk – Dove game (Gintis, 2007 ).
A second bias that also fits the Hawk – Dove model is the IKEA effect : Our valuation
of an object is influenced by whether we have developed or built the resource.
The IKEA effect has been documented by asking people how much they would pay
for items like Lego structures or IKEA furniture after randomly being assigned to
build them or receive them pre-built. Subjects are willing to pay more for items they
build themselves.
A third such bias that fits the Hawk – Dove model is the sunk cost fallacy (Mankiw,
2007 ; Thaler, 1980 ), which leads us to “throw good money after bad” when we
invest in ventures simply because we have already put so much effort into them,
arguably because our prior efforts lead us to value those ventures more.
Possession and past investment are not the only uncorrelated asymmetries that
can dictate rights. Rights can be dictated by a history of agreements, as happens
when one party sells another deed to a house or car, or, as in our taxicab example,
by whether a service was provided. There are also countless examples in which
rights were determined by perhaps unfair or arbitrary characteristics such as race
and sex: Black Americans were expected to give up their seat for Whites in the Jim
Crow South and women to hand over their earnings or property to their husbands
throughout the ages.
Hawk – Dove is not just a post hoc explanation for our sense of rights; it also leads
to the following novel insight: We can formally characterize the properties that
Morality Games
295
uncorrelated asymmetries must have. This requires a bit more game theory to illustrate;
the logic is detailed in the section on categorical distinctions but the implications
are straightforward: Uncorrelated asymmetries must be discrete (as in who
arrived first or whether someone has African ancestry) and cannot be continuous
(who is stronger, whether someone has darker skin). Indeed, we challenge the reader
to identify a case where our sense of rights depends on surpassing a threshold in a
continuous variable (stronger than? darker than?). More generally, an asymmetry
must have the characteristic that, when it occurs, every observer believes it occurred
with a sufficiently high probability, where the exact level of confidence is determined
by the payoffs of the game. This is true of public, explicit speech and handshakes,
but not innuendos or rumors. (Formally, explicit speech and handshakes
induce what game theorists term common p-beliefs.)
The Hawk – Dove explanation of our sense of rights also gives useful clarity on
when there will be conflict. Conflict will arise if both players receive opposing signals
regarding the uncorrelated asymmetry, such as two individuals each believing
they arrived first, or when there are two uncorrelated asymmetries that point in
conflicting directions, such as when one person invested more and the other arrived
first. The former source of conflict appears to be the case in the Israeli–Palestinian
conflict. Indeed, both sides pour great resources into demonstrating their early
possession, especially Israel, through investments in and public displays of archeology
and history. The latter source of conflict appears to be the case in many of the
contested legal disputes in the study by DeScioli and Karpoff ( 2014 ) mentioned
above. An example is one person finds an object on another’s land. Indeed, this turns
out to be a source of many legal conflicts over property rights, and a rich legal tradition
has developed to assign precedence to one uncorrelated asymmetry over another
(Descioli & Karpoff, 2014 ). As usual, we see similar behavior in animals in studies
that provide empirical support for Maynard Smith’s model for animal territoriality:
When two animals are each given the impression they arrived first by, for example,
clever use of mirrors, a fight ensues (Davies, 1978 ).
Authentic Altruism, Motives, and the Envelope Game
In this section , we present a simple extension of the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma
to explain why morality depends not just on what people do but also what they think
or consider .
In the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma and other models of cooperation, players
judge others by their actions—whether they cooperate or defect. However, we not
only care about whether others cooperate but also about their decision-making process:
We place more trust in cooperators who never even considered defecting. To
quote Kant, “In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics
he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so.”
The Envelope Game (Fig. 3 ) models why we care about thoughts and considerations
and not just actions (Hoffman, Yoeli, & Nowak, 2015 ). The Envelope Game
296
M. Hoffman et al.
Fig. 3 A single stage of the Envelope Game
is a repeated game with two players. In each round, player 1 receives a sealed envelope,
which contains a card stating the costs of cooperation (high temptation to
defect vs. low temptation to defect). The temptation is assigned randomly and is
usually low. Player 1 can choose to look inside the envelope and thus find out the
magnitude of the temptation or choose not to look. Then player 1 decides to cooperate
or to defect. Subsequently, player 2 can either continue to the next round or end
the game. As in the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma, the interaction repeats with a
given likelihood, and if it does, an envelope is stuffed with a new card and presented
to player 1, etc.
In this model, as long as temptations are rare, large, and harmful to player 2, it is
a Nash equilibrium for player 1 to “cooperate without looking” in the envelope and
for player 2 to continue if and only if player 1 has cooperated and not looked. We
refer to this as the cooperate without looking (CWOL) equilibrium. 2 This equilibrium
emerges in agent-based simulations of evolution and learning processes. 3 Notice
that if player 1 could not avoid looking inside the envelope, or player 2 could not
observe whether player 1 looked, there would not be a cooperative equilibrium
since player 1 would benefit by deviating to defection in the face of large temptations.
Not looking permits cooperative equilibria in the face of large temptations.
The Envelope Game is meant to capture the essential features of many interesting
aspects of our morality, as described next.
Authentic Altruism . Many have asked whether “[doing good is] always and exclusively
motivated by the prospect of some benefit for ourselves, however subtle”
(Batson, 2014 ), for example, the conscious anticipation of feeling good (Andreoni,
2
Technically, the conditions under which we expect players to avoid looking and attend to looking
are ch > a /(1 − w ) > c lp + ch (1 − p ) and bp + d (1 − p ) < 0), where ch and cl are the magnitudes of the
high and low temptations, respectively; p is the likelihood of the low temptation; a /(1 − w ) is the
value of a repeated, cooperative interaction to player 1; and bp + d (1 − p ) is the expected payoff to
player 2 if player 1 only cooperates when the temptation is low.
3
The simulations employ numerical estimation of the replicator dynamics for a limited strategy
space: cooperate without looking, cooperate with looking, look and cooperate only when the temptation
is low, and always defect for player 1, and end if player 1 looks, end if player 1 defects, and
always end for player 2.
Morality Games
297
1990 ), avoidance of guilt (Cain, Dana, & Newman, 2014 ; Dana, Cain, & Dawes,
2006 ; DellaVigna, List, & Malmendier, 2012 ), anticipation of reputational benefits
or reciprocity (as Plato’s Glaucon suggests, when he proffers that even a pious man
would do evil if given a ring that makes him invisible; Trivers, 1971 ). At the extreme,
this amounts to asking if saintly individuals such as Gandhi or Mother Teresa were
motivated thus, or if they were “authentic” altruists who did good without anticipating
any reward and would be altruistic even in the absence of such rewards.
Certainly, religions advocate doing good for the “right” reasons. In the Gospel of
Matthew, Chapter 6, Jesus advocates, “Be careful not to practice your righteousness
in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your
Father in heaven,” after which he adds, “But when you give to the needy, do not let
your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in
secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”
The Envelope Game suggests authentic altruism is indeed possible: By focusing
entirely on the benefits to others and ignoring the benefits to themselves, authentic
altruists are trusted more, and the benefits from this trust outweigh the risk of, for
example, dying a martyr’s death. Moreover, this model helps explain why we think
so highly of authentic altruists, as compared to others who do good, but with an
ulterior motive (consider, as an example, the mockery Sean Penn has faced for
showing up at disaster sites such as Haiti and Katrina with a photographer in tow).
Principles . Why do we like people who are “principled” and not those who are
“strategic”? For example, we trust candidates for political office whose policies are
the result of their convictions and are consistent over time and distrust those whose
policies are carefully constructed in consultation with their pollsters and who “flipflop”
in response to public opinion (as caricatured by the infamous 2004 Republican
presidential campaign television ad showing John Kerry windsurfing and tacking
from one direction to another). CWOL offers the following potential explanation.
Someone who is strategic considers the costs and benefits to themselves of every
decision and will defect when faced with a large temptation, whereas someone who
is guided by principles is less sensitive to the costs and benefits are to themselves
and thus less likely to defect. Imagine our flip-flopping politician was once against
gay marriage but supports it now that it is popular. This indicates the politician is
unlikely to fight for the cause if it later becomes unpopular with constituents or risks
losing a big donor. Moreover, this model may help explain why ideologues that are
wholly devoted to a cause (e.g., Hitler, Martin Luther King, and Gandhi) are able to
attract so many followers.
Don ’t Use People . Recall Kant’s second formulation of the categorical imperative:
“Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or
in the person of any other, never simply as a means but always at the same time as
an end.” In thinking this through, let’s again consider dwarf tossing. Many see it as
a violation of dwarfs’ basic dignity to use them as a means for amusement, even
though they willingly engage in the activity for economic gain. Our aversion to
using people may explain many important aspects of our moral intuitions, such as
298
M. Hoffman et al.
why we judge torture as worse than imprisonment or punishment (torture is harming
someone as a means to obtaining information) and perhaps one of the (many) reasons
we oppose prostitution (prostitution is having sex with someone as a means to
obtaining money). The Envelope Game clarifies the function of adhering to this
maxim. Whereas those who treat someone well as means to an end would also
mistreat them if expedient, those who treat someone well as an end can be trusted
not to mistreat them when expedient.
Attention to Motives . The previous two applications are examples of a more general
phenomenon: that we judge the moral worth of an action based on the motivation
of the actor, as argued by deontological ethicists, but contested by
consequentialists. The deontological argument is famously invoked by Kant:
“Action from duty has its moral worth not in the purpose to be attained by it but in
the maxim in accordance with which it is decided upon, and therefore does not
depend upon the realization of the object of the action but merely upon the principle
of volition in accordance with which the action is done without regard for any object
of the faculty of desire” (Kant, 1997 ). These applications illustrate that we attend to
motives because they provide valuable information on whether the actor can be
trusted to treat others well even when it is not in her interest.
Altruism Without Prospect of Reciprocation . CWOL also helps explain why people
cooperate in contexts where there is no possibility of reciprocation, such as in
one-shot anonymous laboratory experiments like the dictator game (Fehr &
Fischbacher, 2003 ), as well as when performing heroic and dangerous acts. Consider
soldiers who throw themselves on a grenade to save their compatriots or stories like
that of Liviu Librescu, a professor at the University of Virginia and a Holocaust survivor,
who saved his students during a school shooting. When he heard the shooter
coming toward his classroom, Librescu stood behind the door to his classroom,
expecting that when the shooter tried to shoot through the door, it would kill him and
his dead body would block the door. Mr. Librescu, clearly, did not expect this act to
be reciprocated. Such examples have been used as evidence for group selection
(Wilson, 2006 ), but can be explained by individuals “not looking” at the chance of
future reciprocation. Consistent with this interpretation, cooperation during extreme
acts of altruism is more likely to be intuitive than deliberative (Rand & Epstein,
2014 ), and those who cooperate without considering the prospect of reciprocation
are more trusted (Critcher, Inbar, & Pizarro, 2013 ). We also predict that people are
more likely to cooperate intuitively when they know they are being observed.
The Omission–Commission Distinction
and Higher-Order Beliefs
We explain the omission –commission distinction and the means–by-product distinction
by arguing that these moral intuitions evolved in contexts where punishment is
coordinated. Then , even when intentions are clear to one witness for omissions and
by-products , a witness will think intentions are less clear to the other witnesses .
Morality Games
299
Why don’t we consider it murder to let someone die that we could have easily
saved? For example, we sometimes treat ourselves to a nice meal at a fancy restaurant
rather than donating the cost of that meal to a charity that fights deadly diseases.
This extreme example illustrates a general phenomenon: that people have a tendency
to assess harmful commissions (actions such as killing someone) as worse, or
more morally reprehensible, than equally harmful omissions (inactions such as letting
someone die). Examples of this distinction abound, in ethics (we assess withholding
the truth as less wrong than lying (Spranca, Minsk, & Baron, 1991 )), in law
(it is legal to turn off a patient’s life support and let the patient die, as long as one
has the consent of the patient’s family; however, it is illegal to assist the patient in
committing suicide even with the family’s consent), and in international relations.
For example, consider the Struma, a boat carrying Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi
persecution in 1942. En route to Palestine, the ship’s engine failed, and it was towed
to a nearby port in Turkey. At the behest of the British authorities then in control of
Palestine, passengers were denied permission to disembark and find their way to
Palestine by land. For weeks, the ship sat at port. Passengers were brought only
minimal supplies, and their requests for safe haven were repeatedly denied by the
British and others. Finally, the ship was towed to known hostile waters in the Black
Sea, where it was torpedoed by a Russian submarine almost immediately, killing
791 of 792 passengers. Crucially, though, the British did not torpedo the ship themselves
or otherwise execute passengers—an act of commission that they and their
superiors would undoubtedly have found morally reprehensible.
Why do we distinguish between transgressions of omission and commission? To
address this question, we present a simple game theory model based on the insight
by DeScioli, Bruening, and Kurzban ( 2011 ). The intuition can be summarized in
four steps:
1. We note that moral condemnation motivates us to punish transgressors. Such
punishment is potentially costly, e.g., due to the risk of retaliation. We expect
people to learn or evolve to morally condemn only when such costs are worth
paying.
2. Moral condemnation can be less costly when others also condemn, perhaps
because the risk of retaliation is diffused, because some sanctions do not work
unless universally enforced or, worse, because others may sanction individuals
they believe wrongly sanctioned. This can be modeled using any game with
multiple Nash equilibria, including the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma and the
Side- Taking Game. The Coordination Game is the simplest game with multiple
equilibria, so we present this game to convey the basic intuition. In the
Coordination Game, there are two players who each simultaneously choose
between two actions, say punish and don’t punish. The key assumption is that
each player prefers to do what she expects the other to do, which can be captured
by assuming each receives a if they both punish, d if neither punish, b < d if one
punishes and the other does not, and c < a if one does not punish while the other
does (Fig. 4 ).
3. Transgressions of omission that are intended are difficult to distinguish from
unintended transgression, as is the case when perpetrators are simply not paying
300
M. Hoffman et al.
Fig. 4 The Coordination
Game. In our applications, A
stands for punish, and B
stands for don’t punish
attention or do not have enough time to react with better judgment (DeScioli
et al., 2011 ). Relative to the example of the tennis player with the allergy
described above, it is usually hard to distinguish between a competitor who does
not notice his opponent orders the dish with the allergen versus one who notices
but does not care. In contrast, transgressions of commission must be intended
almost by definition.
4. Suppose the witness knows an omission was intentional: In the above example,
the tennis player’s opponent’s allergy is widely known, and the witness saw the
player watch his opponent order the offending dish, had time to react, thought
about it, but did not to say anything. The witness suspects that others do not
know the competitor was aware his opponent ordered the dish, but believes the
tennis player should be condemned for purposely withholding information from
his competitor. However, since the witness does not wish to be the sole condemner,
she is unlikely to condemn. In contrast, when a witness observes a transgression
of commission (e.g., the player recommends the dish), the witness is
relatively confident that others present interpret the transgression as purposely
harmful, since his recommendation reveals that the player was obviously paying
attention and therefore intended to harm his opponent. So, if all other individuals
present condemn the tennis player when they observe the commission, each does
not anticipate being the sole condemner.
For the above result to hold, all that is needed is the following: (1) The more the costs
of punishment decrease, the more others punish and (2) omissions are usually unintended
(Dalkiran, Hoffman, Paturi, Ricketts, & Vattani, 2012 ; Hoffman et al., 2015 ). 4
4
In fact, even if one knows that others know that the transgression was intended, omission will still
be judged as less wrong, since the transgression still won’t create what game theorists call common
p-belief, which is required for an event to influence behavior in a game with multiple equilibria.
Morality Games
301
This explanation for the omission–commission distinction leads to two novel
predictions: First, for judgments and emotions not evolved to motivate witnesses to
punishment but to, say, motivate witnesses to avoid dangerous partners (such as the
emotion of fear; in contrast to anger or moral disgust), the omission–commission
distinction is expected to be weaker or disappear altogether. Second, for transgressions
of omission that, without any private information, can be presumed intentional
(such as a mother who allows her child to go hungry or a person who does not give
to a charity after being explicitly asked), we would not expect much of an omission–commission
distinction in moral condemnation.
As with the all models discussed in this chapter, the game theoretic explanation
for the omission–commission distinction does not rest on rational, conscious, strategic
calculation. In fact, in this particular case, all reasonable evolutionary dynamic
models lead away from punishing omissions. The fact that the above results do not
rest on rational, strategic thinking is particularly important in this setting since there
is evidence that the distinction between omissions and commissions is not determined
deliberately but rather intuitively (Cushman, Young, & Hauser, 2006 ) and
appears to be evolved (DeScioli et al., 2011 ) and that consciously considering what
others believe is an onerous process (Camerer, 2003 ; Epley, Keysar, Van Boven, &
Gilovich, 2004 ; Hedden & Zhang, 2002 ).
This same model can explain several other puzzling aspects of our morality. The
first is the means –by-product distinction. This distinction has been documented in
studies that ask respondents to judge the following variants of the classic “trolley”
problem. In the standard trolley “switch” case (Foot, 1967), a runaway trolley is
hurtling toward a group of five people. To prevent their deaths, the trolley must be
switched onto a side track where it will kill an innocent bystander. In studies using
this case, the vast majority of subjects choose the utilitarian option, judging it permissible
to cause the death of one to save five (e.g., Cushman et al., 2006 ; Mikhail,
2007). In the “footbridge” variant (Thomson, 1976 ), the trolley is hurtling toward
the group of five people, but the switch to divert it is inoperable. The only way to
save the five is to push a man who is wearing a heavy backpack off a bridge onto the
track, thereby slowing the trolley enough so the five can escape, but killing the man.
In contrast to the standard switch version, where causing the death of one person is
but a by-product of the action necessary to save five, most subjects in the footbridge
case find it morally impermissible to force the man with the backpack onto the
tracks (Cushman et al., 2006 ; DeScioli, Gilbert, & Kurzban, 2012 )—that is, when
the man is used as a means to saving the five—even though the consequences are the
same, and the decision to act was made knowingly and deliberately in both cases.
Such effects are found in less contrived situations, as well. Consider the real-life
distinction between terrorism, in which civilian casualties are used a means to a
political goal, and anticipated collateral damage, which is a by-product of war, even
when the same number of civilians are knowingly killed and the same political ends
are desired (say increased bargaining power in a subsequent negotiation).
The explanation again uses “higher-order beliefs” and is based on the key insight
in DeScioli et al. ( 2011 ) and formalized in Dalkiran et al. ( 2012 ) and Hoffman et al.
( 2015 ): When the harm is done as a by-product, the harm is not usually anticipated.
302
M. Hoffman et al.
So even when a witness knows that the perpetrator anticipated the harm, the witness
believes other witnesses will not be aware of this and will presume the harm was not
anticipated by the perpetrators. For instance, suppose we observe Israel killing civilians
as a by-product of a strategic raid on Hamas militants. Even if we knew Israel
had intelligence that confirmed the presence of civilians, we might not be sure others
were privy to this information. On the other hand, when the harm is done as a
means, the harm must be anticipated, since otherwise the perpetrator would have no
motive to commit the act. Why would Hamas fire rockets at civilian towns with no
military presence if Hamas does not anticipate a chance of civilian casualties?
Consequently, it is Nash equilibrium to punish harm done as a means but not harm
done as a by-product.
Similar arguments can be made for why we find direct physical transgressions
worse than indirect ones, a moral distinction relevant to, for instance, the United
States’ current drone policy. Cushman et al. ( 2006 ) found that subjects condemn
pushing a man off a bridge (to stop a train heading toward five others) more harshly
than flipping a switch that leads the man to fall through a trap door. Pushing the
victim with a stick is viewed as intermediate in terms of moral wrongness. Such
moral wrongness judgments are consistent with considerations of higher-order
beliefs: When a man is physically pushed, any witness knows the pushing was
intended, but when a man is pushed with a stick some might not realize this, and
even those who realize it might suspect others will not. Even more so when a button
is pressed that releases a trap door.
It is worth noting that the above argument does not depend on a specific model
of punishment, as in DeScioli and Kurzban’s ( 2009 ) Side-Taking Game. The above
model also makes the two novel predictions enumerated above, but nevertheless
captures the same basic insight. It is also worth noting the contrast between the
above argument and that of Cushman et al. ( 2006 ) and Greene et al. ( 2009 ), whose
models rest on ease of learning or ease of mentally simulating a situation. It is not
obvious to us how those models would explain that the omission–commission and
means–by-product distinctions seem to depend on priors or be unique to settings of
coordinated punishment.
Why Morality Depends on Categorical Distinctions
We explain why our moral intuitions depends so much more strongly on whether a
transgression occurred than on how much damage was caused. Our argument again
uses coordinated punishment and higher-order beliefs : When a categorical distinction
is violated, you know others know it was violated , but this is not always true for
continuous variables .
Consider the longstanding norm against the use of chemical weapons. This norm
recently made headlines when Bashar al-Assad was alleged to have used chemical
weapons to kill about a thousand Syrian civilians, outraging world leaders who had
Morality Games
303
been silent over his use of conventional weapons to kill over 100,000 Syrian
civilians. A Reuters/Ipsos poll at the time found that only 9 % of Americans favored
intervention in Syria, but 25 % supported intervention if the Syrian government
forces used chemical weapons against civilians (Wroughton, 2013 ). In the past, the
United States has abided by the norm against the use of chemical weapons even at
the expense of American lives: In WWII, Franklin D. Roosevelt chose to eschew
chemical weapons in Iwo Jima even though, as his advisors argued at the time, their
use would have saved thousands of American lives. It might even have been more
humane than the flame-throwers that were ultimately used against the Japanese
(“History of Chemical Weapons,” 2013). We say that the norm against chemical
weapons is a categorical norm because those who abide by it consider whether a
transgression was committed (did Assad use chemical weapons?), rather than focusing
entirely on how much harm was done (how many civilians did Assad kill?).
Other norms are similarly categorical. For instance, in the introduction to this chapter,
we noted that across cultures and throughout history, the norm against murder
has always been categorical: We consider whether a life was terminated, not the loss
of useful life years. Likewise, discrimination (e.g., during Jim Crow) is typically
based on categorical definitions of race (the “one drop rule”) and not, say, the darkness
of skin tone. Human rights are also categorical. A human rights violation
occurs if someone is tortured or imprisoned without trial, regardless of whether it
was done once or many times and regardless of whether the violation was helpful in,
say, gaining crucial information about a dangerous enemy or an upcoming terror
attack. We even assign rights in a categorical way to all Homo sapiens and not based
on intelligence, sentience, ability to feel pain, etc.
Why is it that we attend to such categorical distinctions instead of paying more
attention to the underlying continuous variable? We use game theory to explain this
phenomenon as follows: Suppose that two players (say, the United States and
France) are playing a Coordination Game in which they decide whether to punish
Syria, and each wants to sanction only if the other sanctions. We assume the United
States does not want to levy sanctions unless it is confident France will as well,
which corresponds to an assumption on the payoffs of the game (if we reverse this
assumption, it changes one line in the proof, but not the result).
We model the underlying measure of harm as a continuous variable (in our
example, it is the number of civilians killed). For simplicity, we assume this variable
is uniformly distributed, which means Assad is equally likely to kill any number of
people. This assumption is, again, not crucial, and we will point out the line in the
proof that it affects. Importantly, we assume that players do not directly observe the
continuous variable, but instead receive some imperfect signal (e.g., the United
States observes the body count by its surveyors).
Imagine a norm that dictates that witnesses punish if their estimate of the harm
from a transgression is above some threshold (e.g., levy sanctions against Syria if
the number of civilians killed is estimated to be greater than 100,000). As it turns
out, this is not a Nash equilibrium. To see why, consider what happens when the
United States gets a signal right at the threshold. The United States thinks there is a
304
M. Hoffman et al.
50 % chance that France’s estimates are lower than its own 5 and, thus, that there is
a 50 % chance that France’s estimates are lower than the threshold. This further
implies that the United States assesses only a 50 % chance that France levies sanctions,
so the United States is not sufficiently confident that France will sanction, to
make it in the United States’s interest to sanction.
What we have shown so far is that for a threshold of 100,000, it is in the interest
of the United States to deviate from the strategy dictated by the threshold norm
when it gets a signal at the threshold. This means that 100,000 is not a viable threshold,
and (since 100,000 was chosen arbitrarily) there is no Nash equilibrium in
which witnesses punish if their estimate of the harm from a transgression is above
some arbitrary threshold.
It should be noted that this result only requires that there are sufficiently many
possibilities, not that there is in fact a continuum. Neither does it require that the
distribution is uniform nor that the Coordination Game is not affected by the behavior
of Assad. The only crucial assumptions are that the distribution is not too skewed
and that the payoffs are not too dependent on the behavior of Assad (for details, see
Dalkiran et al., 2012 ; Hoffman, Yoeli, & Dalkiran, 2015 ).
What happens if such norms are learned or evolved and subject to selection?
Suppose there is a norm to attack whenever more than 100,000 civilians are killed.
Players will soon realize that they should not attack unless, say, 100,100 civilians
are killed. Then, players will learn not to attack when they estimate 100,200 civilians
are killed and so on , indefinitely. Thus, every threshold will eventually
“unravel,” and no one will ever attack. 6
Now let’s consider a categorical norm, for example, the use of chemical weapons.
We again model this as a random variable, though this time, the random variable
can only take on two values (0 and 1), each with some probability. Again,
players do not know with certainty whether the transgression occurred, but instead
get a noisy signal. In our example, the signal represents France or the United States’s
assessment of whether Assad used chemical weapons, and there is some likelihood
the assessors make mistakes: They might not detect chemical weapons when they
had been used or might think they have detected chemical weapons when none had
been used.
Unlike with the threshold norm, provided the likelihood of a mistaken signal is
not too high, there is a Nash equilibrium where both players punish when they
receive a signal that the transgression occurred. That is, the United States and France
each levy sanctions if their assessors detect chemical weapons. This is because
when the United States detects chemical weapons, the United States believes France
5
This is where the assumption of a uniform distribution comes in. Had we instead assumed, for
instance, that the continuous variable is normally distributed, then it would not be exactly 50–50
but would deviate slightly depending on the standard deviation and the location of the threshold.
Nevertheless, the upcoming logic will still go through for most Coordination Games, i.e. any
Coordination Game with risk dominance not too close to .5.
6
As with omission, this follows from iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies (see
Hoffman et al., 2015 , for details).
Morality Games
305
likely detected them and will likely levy sanctions. So the United States’s best
response is to levy sanctions. Similarly, if the United States does not detect chemical
weapons, it expects France did not and will not levy sanctions, so the United
States is better off not levying them.
This result is useful for evaluating whether it is worthwhile to uphold a norm.
The Obama administration was harshly criticized for threatening to go to war after
the Assad regime used chemical weapons but not earlier, although the regime had
already killed tens of thousands of civilians. The model clarifies that Obama’s position
was not as inconsistent as his critics had charged: The norm against chemical
weapons may be worth enforcing since it is sustainable, whereas norms against
civilian casualties are harder to sustain and hence might not be worthwhile to
enforce.
Let’s return to some more of our motivating examples. Our model can explain
why we define murder categorically: It is not possible to punish differently for different
amount of quality life years taken, but it is possible to punish differentially for
a life taken. As with omission–commission, however, we do expect sadness or grief
to depend greatly on life years lost, even if the punishment or moralistic outrage will
be less sensitive. This is a prediction of the model that, as far as we know, has yet to
be tested.
Similarly, the “one-drop” rule is a categorical norm, so it can be socially enforced
in an apartheid society. In contrast, consider a rule that advocates giving up one’s
seat for someone with lighter skin. Since this is based on a threshold in a continuous
variable, while it might be enforceable by a unilateral authority, it cannot be enforced
by “mob rule.” Other forms of discrimination, such as discriminating against the
less attractive, or the less tall, or the elderly, all being continuous variables, cannot
be socially enforced via coordinated punishment, and hence, we expect such discrimination
to be of a different form. In particular, it will not be based not on punishing
violators. For example, male CEOs might still prefer young attractive female
secretaries, and taller men are more likely to be hired as CEOs, not because of
coordinated rewards or punishment but because those who hire the CEOs or secretaries
are likely to be satisfying their own preferences or doing what they expect will
lead to higher profits.
Likewise, the number of victims tortured by a regime or the number of lives
saved by torturing is continuous. Thus, a regime cannot be punished by a coordinated
attack by other countries or by a coordinated rebellion by its citizens based on
the number of people tortured or the paucity of reasons for such torture. But, a
regime can be attacked or overthrown depending on whether a physical harm was
inflicted on a citizen by the state. Hence, human rights are treated as inalienable,
even in the absence of an a priori justification for this nonutilitarian norm. And why
are human rights ascribed to all living Homo sapiens ? Perhaps not because of a
good logical a priori argument, but simply because violations of human rights are
enforceable by coordinated punishment, but no regime can be punished for harming
any “person” of less than a certain degree of consciousness.
Finally, here is one last application. The model might also explain why revolutions
are often caused by categorical events, such as a new tea tax or a single, widely
306
M. Hoffman et al.
publicized self-immolation, and not a breach of a threshold in, say, the quality of life
of citizens or the level of corruption. This explanation requires simply that we recognize
revolutions as a coordination problem (as argued in Morris & Shin, 2002 ;
Chwe, 2013 ), where each revolutionary chooses whether to revolt, and each is better
off revolting only if sufficiently many others revolt.
Quirks of Altruism and the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma
with Incomplete Information
The Repeated Prisoner ’s Dilemma has famously been used as an explanation for
the evolution of cooperation among non-kin (Axelrod & Hamilton, 1981 ; Dawkins,
2006 ; Pinker, 2003 ; Trivers, 1971 ). In this section , we show how the same basic
model can be used to explain many of the quirky features of our pro-social preferences
and ideologies .
Recall that in the Prisoner’s Dilemma, each of two players simultaneously
chooses whether to cooperate. Cooperation reduces a player’s own payoffs by c > 0
while increasing the other’s payoffs by b > c . The only Nash equilibrium is for neither
player to cooperate. In the Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma, the players play a
string of Prisoner’s Dilemmas. That is, after the players play a Prisoner’s Dilemma,
they learn what their opponent did and play another Prisoner’s Dilemma against the
same opponent with probability δ (and the game ends with probability 1 − δ ). As is
well known in the evolutionary literature, there are equilibria in which players end
up cooperating, provided δ > c /b . In all such equilibria, cooperation is sustained
because any defection by one player causes the other player to defect. This is called
reciprocity. As the reader is surely familiar, there is ample evidence for the Repeated
Prisoner’s Dilemma as a basis for cooperation from computer simulations (e.g.,
Axelrod, 1984 ) and animal behavior (e.g., Wilkinson, 1984 ). The model can be
extended to explain contributions to public goods if, after deciding whether to contribute
to a public good, players play a Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma (see, e.g.,
Panchanathan & Boyd, 2004 ) (Fig. 5 ).
The key to understanding these quirks is that players often have incomplete
information. For example:
1. Players do not always observe contributions. It is intuitive that, for cooperation
to occur in equilibrium, contributions need to be observed with sufficiently high
probability.
2. Others cannot always tell whether a player had an opportunity to contribute. For
defection to be penalized, it must be the case that others can tell that a player had
the opportunity to cooperate and did not (i.e. the player should not be able to hide
the fact that there was an opportunity to cooperate).
3. Sometimes, there are two ways to cooperate, and one has a higher benefit, b .
Then, the only way this more effective type of cooperation can be sustained in
equilibrium is if others know which cooperative act is more effective.
Morality Games
307
Fig. 5 The Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Two players play a Prisoner’s Dilemma. They each
observe the other’s action, then, with probability δ , play another Prisoner’s Dilemma against the
same opponent, etc.
Technically, for the second and third point, what is needed is common knowledge
that a player had an opportunity to cooperate or of the more effective means of
cooperation. If observers were to know one purposely chose to defect or chose the
less cooperative act, but they do not know that others know this, then observers
think others will think punishment is not warranted, and observers will not punish.
The argument is analogous to the discussion of higher-order beliefs in the omission–commission
subsection and formalized in Dalkiran et al. ( 2012 ) and Hoffman
et al. ( 2015 ).
Interpreting the Quirks of Altruism
Below we discuss some of the quirky features of altruism identified by economists
and psychologists. In each case, we will argue that these features might be puzzling,
but not when viewed through the lens of the above model:
Insensitivity to Effectiveness . We are surprisingly insensitive to the impact of our
charitable contributions. We vote because we “want to be a part of the democratic system,”
or we “want to make a difference,” despite the fact that our likelihood of swinging
an election (even in a swing state) is smaller than our likelihood of being struck by
lightning (Gelman, Silver, & Edlin, 2012 ). Why is our desire to “make a difference” or
“be a part of the system” immune to the actual difference we are making? Our charitable
contributions or volunteer efforts suffer from the same insensitivity. Why does
anyone give money or volunteer time to Habitat for Humanity? The agency flies high
earners who have never held a hammer halfway across the world to build houses that
would be substantially more cheaply built by local experts funded by the high earners.
Experimental evidence demonstrates our insensitivity: Experimental subjects are willing
to pay the same amount to save 2000, 20,000, or 200,000 birds (Desvousges et al.,
2010 ). Likewise, when donors are told their donations will be matched, tripled, or
quadrupled, they donated identical amounts (Karlan & List, 2006 ). Why do we give so
much, but do not ensure our gifts have a large impact?
The explanation follows directly from the above model: It is often the case that
observers do not know which acts are effective and which are not and, certainly, this
308
M. Hoffman et al.
usually is not commonly known. Thus, they will not reward or punish based on
effectiveness, and we ourselves will not attend to effectiveness in equilibrium. This
explanation suggests that if we want to increase efficacy of giving, we ought to
focus on making sure donors’ friends and colleagues are aware of the efficacy of
different options. In fact, this is perhaps more important than informing the donor
of efficacy, since the donor will be motivated to uncover efficacy herself.
Magnitude of the Problem . We are surprisingly unaware of and unaffected by the
magnitudes of the problems we contribute to solving. How many of those who participated
in the recent ALS Ice Bucket Challenge have even the vaguest sense of the
number of ALS victims? (Answer: about 1/100th the victims of heart disease.) How
much happier would these individuals have been if the number of ALS victims were
cut in half? Multiplied by 100? The same questions could be asked about AIDS or
cleft lips. If we were actually motivated by our desire to rid the world of such afflictions
as we often proclaim, then we would be happier if there were fewer afflicted
individuals and less happy if there were more. But we are not even aware of these
numbers, let alone affected by them. This suggests an alternative motivation than
the one we proclaim.
On the other hand, if we give in order to gain social rewards, it does not matter
whether the problem is large or small, provided others recognize it as a problem and
the social norm is to give. If our learned or evolved preferences were drastically
impacted by the magnitude of the crises, we would be sensitive to whether the problem
was solved, perhaps motivating us to ensure that others solve it, which we
would not get credit for, or perhaps motivating us to devote too much of our
resources to solving it, beyond what we would actually get rewarded for.
Observability . There is overwhelming evidence that people give more when their
gifts are observed. Much of this evidence comes from the lab, where it has been
demonstrated a myriad of ways (e.g., Andreoni & Petrie, 2004 ; Bolton, Katok, &
Ockenfels, 2005 ; List, Berrens, Bohara, & Kerkvliet, 2004 ). For instance, when
participants play a public goods game in the laboratory for money, their contributions
are higher when they are warned that one subject will have to announce to the
room of other participants how much they contributed (List et al., 2004 ). However,
evidence also comes from real-world settings, which find large effects in settings as
diverse as blood donation (Lacetera & Macis, 2010 ), blackout prevention (Yoeli,
Hoffman, Rand, & Nowak, 2013 ), and support for national parks (Alpizar, Carlsson,
& Johansson-Stenman, 2008 ). In Switzerland, voting rates fell in small communities
when voters were given the option to vote by mail (Funk, 2006 ), which makes
it harder to tell who did not vote, even though it also makes it easier to vote. In fact,
our willingness to give more when observed extends to subtle, subconscious cues of
being observed: People give twice as much in dictator games when there are markings
on the computer screen that vaguely represent eyes (Haley & Fessler, 2005 ),
and they are more likely to pay for bagels in their office when the payment box has
a picture of eyes above it (Bateson, Nettle, & Roberts, 2006 ).
These results should not surprise anyone who believes our pro-social tendencies are
influenced by reputational concerns (though the magnitudes are surprisingly large).
Morality Games
309
The effectiveness of subconscious cues of observability points to a primary role for
reputations in our learned or evolved proclivities toward pro-social behavior. The
large impact of subtle cues of observability, however, calls into question alternative
explanations not based on reputations.
Explicit Requests . When we are asked directly for donations, we give more than if
we are not asked, even though no new information is conveyed by the request. In a
study of supermarket shoppers around Christmas time, researchers found that passersby
were more likely to give to the Salvation Army if volunteers not only rang
their bell but explicitly asked for a donation (Andreoni, Rao, & Trachtman, 2011 ).
If our motive is to actually do good, or perhaps proximally to feel good by the act of
giving, we should not be impacted by an explicit request.
However, if we evolved or learned to give in order to gain rewards or avoid punishment
as described above, then we ought to be more likely to give when, if we did
not give, it would be common knowledge that we had the option to give and chose
not to. The explicit request makes the denial common knowledge.
It is worth emphasizing that our evolved intuition to respond to explicit asks may
be (mis)applied to individual settings that lack social rewards. Imagine you are
approached by a Salvation Army volunteer in front of a store in a city where you are
visiting for one day only. A literal reading of the model would suggest that you
should be no more likely to respond to an explicit request. But it is more realistic to
expect that if your pro-social preferences were learned or evolved in repeated interactions
then applied to this new setting, you would respond in a way that is not
optimal for this particular setting and nonetheless give more when explicitly asked
(just as our preferences for sweet and fatty foods, which evolved in an environment
where food was scarce, lead us to overeat now that food is abundant).
Avoiding Situations in Which We Are Expected to Give . In the same supermarket
study, researchers discovered that shoppers were going out of their way to exit the
store through a side door, to avoid being asked for a contribution by the Salvation
Army volunteers. In another field experiment, those who were warned in advance
that a solicitor would come to the door asking for charitable donations were more
likely to not be home. The researchers estimated that among those who gave, 50 %
would have avoided being home if warned in advance of the solicitor’s time of
arrival (DellaVigna et al., 2012 ). In a laboratory analog, subjects who would have
otherwise given money in a $10 dictator game were willing to pay a dollar to keep
the remaining nine dollars and prevent the recipient from knowing that a dictator
game could have been played (Dana et al. 2006 ). If our motive were to have an
impact, we would not pay to avoid putting ourselves in a situation where we could
have such an impact. Likewise, if our motive were to feel good by giving, we would
not pay to avoid this feeling.
In contrast, if we evolved or learned to give in order to gain rewards or avoid
punishment, then we would pay to avoid situations where we are expected to give.
Again, this would be true even if, in this particular setting, we were unlikely to actually
be punished.
310
M. Hoffman et al.
Norms . People are typically conditionally cooperative , meaning that they are willing
to cooperate more when they believe others contribute more. For example, students
asked to donate to a university charity gave 2.3 percentage points more when
told that others had given at a rate of 64 % than when they were told giving rates
were 46 % (Frey & Meier, 2004 ). Hotel patrons were 26 % more likely to reuse their
towels when informed most others had done the same (Goldstein, Cialdini, &
Griskevicius, 2008 ). Households have been shown to meaningfully reduce electricity
consumption when told neighbors are consuming less, both in the United States
(Ayres, Raseman, & Shih, 2012 ) and in India (Sudarshan, 2014 ).
Such conditional cooperation is easily explained by the game theory model:
When others give, one can infer that one is expected to give and may be socially
sanctioned if one does not.
Strategic Ignorance . Those at high risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease
(STD) often go untested, presumably because if they knew they had the STD,
they would feel morally obliged to refrain from otherwise desirable activity that
risks spreading the STD. Why is it more reproachable to knowingly put a sexual
partner at risk when one knows one has the STD than to knowingly put a sexual
partner at risk by not getting tested? There is evidence that we sometimes pursue
strategic ignorance and avoid information about the negative consequences of our
decisions to others. When subjects are shown two options, one that is better for
themselves but worse for their partners and one that is worse for themselves but better
for their partners, many choose the option that is better for their partners. But,
when subjects must first press a button (at no cost) to reveal which option is better
for their partners, they choose to remain ignorant and simply select the option that
is best for themselves (Dana, Weber, & Kuang, 2007 ).
This quirk of our moral system is again easy to explain with the above model.
Typically, information about how one’s actions affect others is hard to obtain, so
people cannot be blamed for not having such information. When one can get such
information easily, others may not know that it is easy to obtain and will not punish
anyone who does not have the information. For example, although it is trivially easy
to look up charities’ financial ratings on websites like charitynavigator.org, few
people know this and could negatively judge those that donate without first checking
such websites. And even when others know that one can get this information
easily, they might suspect that others do not know this, and so avoid punishing,
since others won’t expect punishment. To summarize, strategic ignorance prevents
common knowledge of a violation and so is likely to go unpunished. We again
emphasize that we will be lenient of strategic ignorance, even when punishment is
not literally an option.
Norm of Reciprocity . We feel compelled to reciprocate favors, even if we know
that the favors were done merely to elicit reciprocation and even if the favor asked
in return is larger than the initial one granted (Cialdini 2001). For instance, members
of Hare Krishna successfully collect donations by handing out flowers to disembarking
passengers at airports, even though passengers want nothing to do with
the flowers: They walk just a few feet before discarding them in the nearest bin.
Morality Games
311
Psychologists and economists sometimes take this “norm” as given, without asking
where it comes from, and a naive reading of Trivers would lead one to think that we
should be sensitive to the magnitude of the initial favor and whether it is
manipulative.
However, according to the above model, reciprocity is the Nash equilibrium,
even if the favors are not evenly matched or manipulative, since, in equilibrium, we
are neither sensitive to such quantitative distinctions nor to whether the initial reciprocity
was manipulative, unless these facts are commonly known.
Self-Image Concerns . People sometimes play mental tricks in order to appear to
themselves as pro-social. For example, in an experiment, subjects will voluntarily take
on a boring task to save another subject from doing it, but if given the option of privately
flipping a coin to determine who gets the task, they often flip—and flip, and flip
again—until the “coin” assigns the task to the other subject (Batson, Kobrynowicz,
Dinnerstein, Kampf, & Wilson, 1997 ). Why would we be able to fool ourselves and
not, say, recognize that we are gaming the coin flip? Why do we care what we think
of ourselves at all? Are there any constraints on how we will deceive ourselves?
Such self-image considerations can be explained by noting that our self-image can
act as a simple proxy, albeit an imperfect one, for what others think of us, and also that
we are more convincing to others when we believe something ourselves (Kurzban,
2012 ; Trivers, 2011 ). This explanation suggests that the ways we deceive ourselves
correspond to quirks described throughout this section—for example, we will absolve
ourselves of remaining strategically ignorant even when it is easy not to, or be convinced
that we have done good by voting, even if we cannot swing an election.
Framing Effects . Whether we contribute is highly dependent on the details of the
experiment, such as the choice set (List, 2007 ) and the labels for the different
choices (Ross & Ward, 1996 ; Roth, 1995 ). Such findings are often taken as evidence
that social preferences cannot be properly measured in the lab (Levitt & List, 2007 ).
We believe a more fruitful interpretation is simply that the frame influences
whether the laboratory experiment “turns on” our pro-social preferences, perhaps
by simulating a situation where cooperation is expected (Levitt & List, 2007 ).
One-Shot Anonymous Giving : We give in anonymous, one-shot settings, such as
dictator games. We also sacrifice for others in the real world when there is no chance
of reciprocation: Heroes jump on grenades to save their fellow soldiers or block the
door to a classroom with their bodies to prevent a school shooter from entering
(Rand & Epstein, 2014 ). This is often seen as evidence for a role of group selection
(Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003 ).
However, an alternate explanation is that we do not consider the likelihood of
reciprocation (Hoffman et al., 2015 ), as described above. To explain the laboratory
evidence, there are two more possibilities. First, subjects may believe there is some
chance their identity will be revealed and feel the costs of being revealed as selfish
are greater than the gains from the experiment (Delton, Krasnow, Cosmides, &
Tooby, 2011 ). Second, we again emphasize that learned or evolved preferences and
ideologies are expected to be applied even in novel settings to which they are not
optimized.
312
M. Hoffman et al.
Conclusion
In this chapter we have showed that a single approach–game theory , with the help
of evolution and learning –can explain many of our moral intuitions and ideologies.
We now discuss two implications .
Group Selection . Our chapter relates to the debate on group selection, whereby
group level competition and reproduction is supposed to occasionally cause individuals
to evolve to sacrifice their own payoffs to benefit the group (e.g., Wilson,
2006 ). One of the primary pieces of evidence cited in support of group selection is
the existence of human cooperation and morality (Fehr & Fischbacher, 2003 ; Fehr,
Fischbacher, & Gächter, 2002 ; Gintis, Bowles, Boyd, & Fehr, 2003 ; Haidt, 2012 ;
Wilson, 2010 , 2012 ), in particular: giving in one-shot anonymous laboratory experiments,
intuitively sacrificing one’s life for the group (jumping on the grenade), and
contributions to public goods or charity. However, we have reviewed an alternative
explanation for these phenomena that does not rest on group selection. It also yields
predictions about these phenomena that group selection does not, such as that people
are more likely to cooperate when they are being observed and there is variance
in the cost of cooperation. The approach described here also explains other phenomena,
such as categorical norms and ineffective altruism. These lead to social welfare
losses, which is suboptimal from the group’s perspective. The categorical norm
against murder, for example, leads to enormous waste when keeping alive, sometimes
for years, those who have virtually no chance of a future productive life.
Admittedly, despite their inefficiencies, these moral intuitions do not rule out
group selection, since group selection can be weak relative to individual selection.
But it does provide a powerful argument that group selection is unnecessary for
explaining many interesting aspects of human morality. It also suggests that group
selection is, indeed, at most, weak. One example that makes this especially clear is
discrete norms. Recall that we argued that continuous norms are not sustainable
because individuals benefit by deviating around the threshold. Notice that this benefit
is small, since the likelihood that signals are right around the threshold is low.
Group selection could easily overwhelm the benefit one would get from deviating
from this Nash equilibrium, suggesting group selection is weak (i.e. there are few
group- level reproductive events, high migration rates, high rates of “mutation” in
the form of experimentation among individuals, etc.).
Logical Justification of Moral Intuitions . In each of the applications above, we
explained moral intuitions without referring to existing a priori logical justifications
by philosophers or others. Our explanation for our sense of rights does not rely on
Locke’s “state of nature.” No argument we gave rests on God as an orderly designer,
on Platonic ideals, on Kant’s concepts of autonomy and humanity, etc. What does
this mean for these a priori justifications? It suggests that they are not the source of
our morality and are, instead, post hoc justifications of our intuitions (Haidt, 2012 ).
To see what we mean, consider the following analogy. One might wonder why
we find paintings and sculptures of voluptuous women beautiful. Before the
Morality Games
313
development of sexual selection theory, one might have argued that perfect spheres
are some kind of Platonic solid, and inherently desirable, or that curvy hips yield
golden ratios. But with our current understanding of sexual selection, we recognize
that our sense of beauty has evolved and that there is no platonic sense of beauty
outside of that shaped by sexual selection. Any argument about perfect spheres is
unparsimonious and likely flawed. Without the help of evolution and game theory,
did philosophers conjure the moral equivalents of perfect spheres and golden ratios?
The state of nature, the orderly designer, Platonic ideals, autonomy, and humanity,
etc.—perhaps these arguments are also unfounded and unnecessary.
References
Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity:
Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. Journal of Public
Economics, 92 (5), 1047–1060.
Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse
into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88 (7), 1605–1623.
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving.
The Economic Journal, 100 , 464–477.
Andreoni, J., Rao, J. M., & Trachtman, H. (2011). Avoiding the ask: A fi eld experiment on altruism,
empathy, and charitable giving . Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211 (4489),
1390–1396.
Ayres, I., Raseman, S., & Shih, A. (2012). Evidence from two large field experiments that peer
comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. Journal of Law, Economics, and
Organization , 2–20.
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a
real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2 (3), 412–414.
Batson, C. D. (2014). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer . Hillside, NJ:
Psychology Press.
Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a
very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
72 (6), 1335.
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2005). Cooperation among strangers with limited information
about reputation. Journal of Public Economics, 89 (8), 1457–1468.
Cain, D., Dana, J., & Newman, G. (2014). Giving vs. giving in. Yale University Working Paper.
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction . Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Chammah, A. M., & Rapoport, A. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma; a study in confl ict and cooperation
. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Chwe, M. (2013). Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. , 330 U.S. 212, 67 S. Ct. 752, 91 L. Ed. 849 (1947).
Critcher, C. R., Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2013). How quick decisions illuminate moral character.
Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4 (3), 308–315.
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in
moral judgment testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17 (12), 1082–1089.
314
M. Hoffman et al.
Dalkiran, N. A., Hoffman, M., Paturi, R., Ricketts, D., & Vattani, A. (2012). Common knowledge
and state-dependent equilibria. In Algorithmic game theory (pp. 84–95). New York: Springer.
Dana, J., Cain, D. M., & Dawes, R. M. (2006). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but
quiet) exit in dictator games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100 (2),
193–201.
Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, J. X. (2007). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments
demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33 (1), 67–80.
Davies, N. B. (1978). Territorial defense in the speckled wood butterfly (pararge aegeria): The resident
always wins. Animal Behaviour, 26 , 138–147.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfi sh gene . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012). Testing for altruism and social pressure in
charitable giving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (1), 1–56.
Delton, A. W., Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2011). Evolution of direct reciprocity
under uncertainty can explain human generosity in one-shot encounters. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 108 (32), 13335–13340.
DeScioli, P., Bruening, R., & Kurzban, R. (2011). The omission effect in moral cognition: Toward
a functional explanation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32 (3), 204–215.
DeScioli, P., Gilbert, S. S., & Kurzban, R. (2012). Indelible victims and persistent punishers in
moral cognition. Psychological Inquiry, 23 (2), 143–149.
DeScioli, P., & Wilson, B. J. (2011). The territorial foundations of human property. Evolution and
Human Behavior, 32 (5), 297–304.
DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112 (2), 281–299.
Descioli, P., & Karpoff, R. (2014). People’s judgments about classic property law cases . Brandeis
University Working Paper.
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., Wilson, K. N.,
et al. (2010). Measuring nonuse damages using contingent valuation: An experimental evaluation
of accuracy . Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.
Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric
anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (3), 327.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425 (6960), 785–791.
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the
enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13 (1), 1–25.
Fisher, R. A. (1958). The genetic theory of natural selection . Mineola, NY : Dover.
Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: WW
Norton & Co.
Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional
cooperation” in a field experiment. American Economic Review, 94 , 1717–1722.
Funk, P. (2006). Modern voting tools, social incentives and voter turnout: Theory and evidence.
In Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association , Chicago, IL.
Gelman, A., Silver, N., & Edlin, A. (2012). What is the probability your vote will make a difference?
Economic Inquiry, 50 (2), 321–326.
Gintis, H. (2007). The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
64 (1), 1–16.
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans.
Evolution and Human Behavior, 24 (3), 153–172.
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a view-point: Using social
norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (3),
472–482.
Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart, L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D.
(2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral
judgment. Cognition, 111 (3), 364–371.
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion .
New York: Vintage.
Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an
anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26 .
Morality Games
315
Hedden, T., & Zhang, J. (2002). What do you think I think you think? Strategic reasoning in matrix
games. Cognition, 85 (1), 1–36.
Hoffman, M., Yoeli, E., & Nowak, M. A. (2015). Cooperate without looking: Why we care what
people think and not just what they do. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
112 (6), 1727–1732.
Hoffman, M., Yoeli, E., & Dalkiran, A. (2015). Social applications of common knowledge . Harvard
University Working Paper.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect
and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98 , 1325–1348.
Kant, I. (1997/1787). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (1785). Practical Philosophy,
108 .
Karlan, D., & List, J. A. (2006). Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a largescale
natural fi eld experiment . Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Kurzban, R. (2012). Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite: Evolution and the modular mind.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lacetera, N., & Macis, M. (2010). Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence
from a nonlinear incentive scheme. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76 (2),
225–237.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences
reveal about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 , 153–174.
List, J. A. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy,
115 (3), 482–493.
List, J. A., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., & Kerkvliet, J. (2004). Examining the role of social
isolation on stated preferences. American Economic Review, 94 , 741–752.
Locke, J. (1988/1688). Locke: Two treatises of government student edition . Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Mankiw, N. G. (2007). Principles of economics . Thomson Learning.
Milgrom, P., & Weber, R. J. (1982). The value of information in a sealed-bid auction. Journal of
Mathematical Economics, 10 (1), 105–114.
Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (2002). Social value of public information. The American Economic
Review, 92 (5), 1521–1534.
Myerson, R. B. (2004). Justice, institutions, and multiple equilibria. Chicago Journal of
International Law, 5 , 91.
Neuwirth, R. (2005). Shadow cities: A billion squatters, a new urban world . New York: Routledge.
Nowak, M. A. (2006). Evolutionary dynamics: Exploring the equations of life . Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2004). Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the
second-order free rider problem. Nature, 432 (7016), 499–502.
Pinker, S. (2003). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature . UK: Penguin.
Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 105 (3), 833–838.
Rand, D. G., & Epstein, Z. G. (2014). Risking your life without a second thought: Intuitive
decision- making and extreme altruism . Available at SSRN 2424036.
Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding.
In T. Brown, E. Reed, & E. Turiel (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 103–135).
Roth, A. E. (1995). Bargaining experiments. In J. H. Kagel & E. R. Alvin (Eds.), The handbook of
experimental economics (pp. 253–342). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sigg, H., & Falett, J. (1985). Experiments on respect of possession and property in hamadryas
baboons ( Papio hamadryas ). Animal Behaviour, 33 (3), 978–984.
Smith, J. M., & Price, G. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246 , 15.
Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious
behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 12 (6), 264–274.
Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27 (1), 76–105.
316
M. Hoffman et al.
Sudarshan, A. (2014). Nudges in the marketplace: Using peer comparisons and incentives to reduce
household electricity consumption . Technical report, Harvard University Working Paper.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior &
Organization, 1 (1), 39–60.
Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59 (2), 204–217.
Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Trivers, R. (2011). The folly of fools: The logic of deceit and self-deception in human life.
New York: Basic Books.
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46 ,
35–57.
Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14 (1), 249–264.
Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature, 308 (5955), 181–184.
Wilson, D. S. (2010). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society . Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, E. O. (2012). The social conquest of earth . New York: WW Norton & Company.
Wilson, D. S. (2006). Human groups as adaptive units: Toward a permanent consensus. In
P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Culture and cognition . Oxford,
UK: Oxford University Press.
Winter, E. (2014). Feeling smart: Why our emotions are more rational than we think. Public Books.
Wroughton, L. (2013). As Syria War Escalates, Americans Cool to U.S. Intervention: Reuter/Ipsos
Poll. Reuters , August 24, 2013. Accessed at http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/25/
us-syria- crisis-usa-poll-idUSBRE97O00E20130825 on 12 March 2015.
Yoeli, E., Hoffman, M., Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Powering up with indirect reciprocity
in a large-scale field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
110 (Suppl. 2), 10424–10429.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology,
53 (1), 205–214.
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028094.txt,"also briefed Rabin after the election. At that stage, there was no discussion of

whether we actually would, or should, target Saddam. I asked Misha, and then
Yitzhak, only whether such an operation might seriously be considered by the
government. If not, I said, we’d drop it. Both replied that we should go ahead

with the planning and preparation. The November 1992 exercise was intended
as a final test of its viability — before deciding whether actually to do it.

A few weeks earlier, Rabin and I had talked through the arguments for and
against. The arguments against it were obvious. Yes, in the past we had
abducted, or even killed, leaders of groups involved in terror attacks. But we’d
never contemplated targeting a head of state. Crossing that line risked being
seen not just as attacking a dictator with a record of ruthlessness and murder at
home, and aggression towards Israel, but long-accepted norms of international
relations. The arguments in favour began with the fact that Saddam was a
meglomaniacally ambitious dictator. He had also fired missiles on our towns
and cities. He retained the capability to arm them with chemical warheads,
possibly biological agents, and conceivably a nuclear warhead in the future.
Both Rabin and I agreed there were two key tests of whether an attack would be
justified: was it was the only realistic way of confronting the threat from Iraq,
and would killing him end, or at least exponentially reduce, that threat.

Though there was no final decision at our meeting, Rabin was clearly
inclined to go ahead. An Israeli TV program two decades later unearthed a
summary of the discussion, written by his military aide. “The Prime Minister
approves the target... This is an operation we should go for when the probability
of success is very high,” it said. “Thus, we have to build the operational
capability in the best possible way, and continue preparations.” In another part
of the record, Rabin is quoted as having defined the elimination of Saddam as a
“meaningful objective” with implications for “the very security of Israel.” He
added: “I do not see anyone similar to him in the Arab world.”

I, too, was on balance persuaded we should do it. In the years since, I’ve
sometime reflected on what happened with Saddam still in place: the 2003
invasion of Iraq, led by the younger President Bush, the tens of thousands of
lives lost, the trillions of dollars spent on a war without any clear end, and the
near-disintegration of Iraq. But with the complexities of Iraq then and now,
there can be no simple answer to how the situation would have changed if we’d
killed Saddam. Our view, based on detailed intelligence analyses, was that the
likely result would have been a fairly rapid takeover by a few top security and
Baath Party figures and that, while the new Iraqi leadership might try to retaliate

246
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028094
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029279.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 11/10/2016 9:53:43 PM
To: Lito

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-

Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029279
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032306.txt,"From: Darren Indyke 
Sent: 10/9/2016 2:53:46 AM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Importance: High 
i Privileged - Redacted i 
i 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Oct 8, 2016, at 9:17 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Privileged - Redacted 
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Darren Indyke < > wrote: 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Miller, Michael"" < 
Date: October 8, 2016 at 4:52:27 PM EDT 
To: ""Darren Indyke 
Cc: ""Weingarten, Reid"" 
Subject: FW: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Michael C. Miller 
Partner 
www.steptoe.com/mmiller 
Steptoe 
> 
Privileged - Redacted 
direct Steptoe & Johnson LLP 
fax 1114 Avenue of the Americas 
cell New York, NY 10036 
www.steptoe.com  
This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. 
From: Palazzolo, Joseph 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 4:49 PM 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032306 
To: Miller, Michael 
Subject: WSJ inquiry -- on deadline 
Hi, Michael. 
I'm writing about the Jane Doe case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Can I talk to you briefly? Story is likely 
going online in the next couple hours. Apologies for the short notice. I wanted to get a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein. 
Thanks and best, 
Joe 
Joe Palazzolo 
Staff reporter 
1211 Avenue of the Americas 
New York, NY 10036 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032307 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013947.txt,"In the linked article, Cisco acknowledges that remote work arrangements are “here to stay” yet lists a
set of security issues. It makes sense to preemptively research solutions so that you are armed and ready

if your employer raises these concerns. http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2008/prod_020508 html.
—Contributed by RAINA

58. If you’re an entrepreneur, don’t skip this chapter. This introduction to remote working tools and
tactics is integral to the international pieces of the puzzle that follow.

59. This verb is used by Japanese women as well, even though female workers are referred to as
“OL” — office ladies.

60. Any reason to be home will do (cable or phone installation, home repairs, etc.) or, if you prefer
not to use a ruse, work a weekend or take two vacation days.

61. Review the Puppy Dog Close from “Income Autopilot II: Testing the Muse.”

62. Do not digress from your goal. Once you’ve addressed an objection or concern, go for the close.
63. Friday is the best day to be in the office. People are relaxed and tend to leave early.

64. Do not accept a vague refusal. Pinpointing the main concern in detail enables you to overcome it.

65. Don’t jump to the defensive after an objection. Acknowledge the validity of a boss’s concerns to
prevent an ego-driven battle of wills.

66. Note this indirect threat dressed as a confession. It will make the boss think twice about refusing
but prevents the win-lose outcome of an ultimatum.

67. This removes the boss’s ability to call you to the office. This is critical for making the first jump
overseas.

®

Beyond Repair

» KILLING YOUR JOB

All courses of action are risky, so prudence is not in avoiding danger (it’s impossible), but
calculating risk and acting decisively. Make mistakes of ambition and not mistakes of sloth.
Develop the strength to do bold things, not the strength to suffer.

—NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI, The Prince

Existential Pleas and Resignations Mad Libs
BY ED MURRAY

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013947
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020153.txt,"[DECEMBER DRAFT--- 287 pages]

THE SNOWDEN AFFAIR

A Spy Story in Six Parts

By Edward Jay Epstein

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020153
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011330.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

27
H3VOGIU1

Her reputation for truthfulness does not go to any bad
acts she may have committed 20 years ago. And your Honor, even

criminal convictions are generally not admissible 10 years

after the fact. So presentation of this type of evidence is

simply nothing more than a smear campaign, which is prescribed

by multiple Federal Rules of Evidence.

And finally, any marginal probative value of these bad

acts as a child is vastly outweighed by the undue prejudice it
would cause Ms. Giuffre before a jury.

Your Honor, now I'm turning to point number 12. We've

asked the Court to exclud vidence relating to the tax

compliance of Ms. Giuffre's not-for-profit Victims Refuse

Silence. Rule 401 is the first rule under which this should be

excluded. The alleged tax compliance of her not-for-profit

does not go to whether or not defendant defamed Ms. Giuffre and

does not go to whether or not defendant abused Ms. Giuffre.

It should also b xcluded under 403. It is highly

prejudicial. It would give the wrong impression to the jury
that Ms. Giuffre's organization is not tax compliant, which, in
fact, it is a fact that defendant does not acknowledge in her
briefing.

Proving whether or not Ms. Giuffre's not-for-profit is

tax compliant would also be a mini trial and, frankly, a

sideshow to this case.

Furthermore, all of defendant's conclusions about

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011330
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012481.txt,"om

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

oO Oo oO 4 TO OH FPF WwW DY

—_— tk
—_

12
13

; ~0929104.TXT
note drinking any kind of alcohol, if you would lIaok at

my other pictures in that album. You guys picked the
possibly worst pictures out of there to present. And it
was just a goofy picture. All of these kids like to be
goofy. And that's what we were doing.

Q. Who's the man on the left of the picture
holding his -- holding a beer bottle as if it were a
penis towards your mouth?

A. Steven a.

Q. Who's the man behind you, right up towards

your backs side, with you bent over?

A. That one?

Q. The right side, kissing with his mouth.

A. That's Nick SD

Q. He's the one grabbing towards the groin
area of Steven |

A. Yes.

101
Q. And there's three other men in the photo.

What are their names? The one on the left with the hat?

A. That's Robbie P| (phonetic) .
Q. Smiling?

A. Yes.

Q.

Who's the one kissing --
MR. LEOPOLD: Don't interrupt. Let her
finish the record. She's testifying.
MR. TEIN: § Know you don't like this
picture, my friend.
MR. LEOPOLD: The picture is fine.
BY MR. TEIN:

Q. Who's the one with the hat?
Page 86

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012481
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032312.txt,"From: Andres Serrano 
Sent: 10/10/2016 9:30:57 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
Either one I guess. Just came back from Ireland where I have a show called ""Torture."" 
Andres Serrano 
WEB 
VOID hosts first Irish exhibition by renowned artist Andres Serrano 
Arts Council of Northern Ireland 
Serrano's work has been praised and debated in equal measure since the 1980's and has raised questions on taste, 
censorship and acceptable ... 
On Oct 10, 2016, at 4:19 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
no good choice. how are u 
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Andres Serrano wrote: 
Jeffrey, 
I was prepared to vote against Trump for all the right reasons but I'm so disgusted by the outrage over ""grab 
them by the pussy"" that I may give him my sympathy vote. 
I'm sure Bill C said things, too. 
Andres 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032312 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032313 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013953.txt,"that you’re in a game not worth winning?
The consequences of bad decisions do not get better with age.

What cheesecake are you eating?

> Q&A: QUESTIONS AND ACTIONS

Only those who are asleep make no mistakes.
—INGVAR KAMPRAD, founder of IKEA, world’s largest furniture brand

Ten of thousands of people, most of them less capable than you, leave their jobs every day. It’s

neither uncommon nor fatal. Here are a few exercises to help you realize just how natural job changes
are and how simple the transition can be.

1. ‘First, a familiar reality check: Are you more likely to find what you want in your current job or
somewhere else?

If you were fired from your job today, what would you do to get things under financial control?

3. Take a sick day and post your resume on the major job sites. Even if you have no immediate plans
to leave your job, post your resume on sites such as www.monster.com and www.career-
builder.com, using a pseudonym if you prefer. This will show you that there are options besides
your current place of work. Call headhunters if your level makes such a step appropriate, and send
a brief e-mail such as the one below to friends and non-work contacts.

Dear All,

I am considering making a career move and am interested in all opportunities that might come to
mind. Nothing is too outrageous or out of left field. [If you know what you want or don’t want on
some level, feel free to add, “I am particularly interested in ...” or “I would like to avoid ...”’]

Please let me know if anything comes to mind!

Tim

Call in sick or take a vacation day to complete all of these exercises during a normal 9-5 workday.
This will simulate unemployment and lessen the fear factor of non-office limbo.

In the world of action and negotiation, there is one principle that governs all others: The person
who has more options has more power. Don’t wait until you need options to search for them. Take
a sneak peek at the future now and it will make both action and being assertive easier.

4. If you run or own a company, imagine that you have just been sued and must declare bankruptcy.
The company is now insolvent and you must close up shop. This is something you must legally do,
and there are no finances to entertain other options. How would you survive?

» TOOLS AND TRICKS

Considering Options and Pulling the Trigger

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013953
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020147.txt,"Fer |"" Bates | Ree |F SEE

Venture Capital Deals

¢ Moovit, an Israeli maker of a transportation app, has raised $50 million in Series D
funding led by Intel Capital, with participation from Sequoia, BMW iVentures, NGP,
Sound Ventures, BRM, Gemini, Vaizra, Vintage, and Hanaco. http://axios.link/fQSW

¢ Vectra, a San Jose, Calif.-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $36 million in
Series D funding led by Atlantic Bridge, with participation from the Ireland
Strategic Investment Fund, Nissho Electronics Corp., Khosla Ventures, Accel Partners,
IA Ventures, AME Cloud Ventures, DAG Ventures and Wipro Ventures. www.vectra.ai

¢ FourKites, a Chicago-based make of supply chain management software, has raised
$35 million in Series B funding. August Capital led the round, with participation
from Bain Capital Ventures and Hyde Park Venture Partners. http://axios.link/7XWI

« DecaWave, an Irish fabless semiconductor company, has raised $30 million in
funding led by Atlantic Bridge Ventures, with participation from the China Ireland
Growth Technology Fund, ACT Venture Capital, and ZZ Ventures.

¢ Kidaptiv, a Mountain View, Calif.-based maker of adaptive learning software, has
raised $19.1 million in Series C funding led by Formation 8 and Korean education
company Woongjin ThinkBig. http://axios.link/Fuut

¢ Prophesee, a Paris-based machine vision startup, has raised $19 million in Series B
funding led by an undisclosed investor, with participation from 360 Capital Partners,
Supernova Invest, iBionext, Intel Capital, Renault Group, and Robert Bosch Venture
Capital, according to Tech.eu. http://axios.link/QAyn

¢ Greenlight Financial Technology, an Atlanta-based maker of a smart debit card
for kids, teens, and college students, has raised $16 million in Series A funding led by
TTIV Capital with participation from New Enterprise Associates, Relay Ventures,
SunTrust Bank, Ally Financial, nbke bank, Canapi, and the Amazon Alexa Fund.
www.greenlightcard.com

e Zagster, a Cambridge, Mass.-based bike-share service, has raised $15 million in new
funding led by Edison Capital Partners. www.zagster.com

¢ Morphisec, and Israel-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $12 million in Series
B funding from Orange Digital Ventures, Jerusalem Venture Partners, General
Electric, and Deutsche Telekom. www.morphisec.com

¢ Tunity, a New York-based live audio service for television content, has raised $12
million in Series A funding. Investors include former Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack
and WeWork CEO Adam Neumann. www.tunity.com

¢ Fever Labs, a New York-based maker of an event discovery app, has raised $11.7
million in new funding, according to an SEC filing. www.feverup.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020147
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012495.txt,"18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

—_

oO © A 4 DP oO fF WwW DN

~0929104. TXT
lawyer.

MR. LEOPOLD: The natural mother lives in
Georgia. The father is here locally.

MR. TEIN: Stop coaching. Stop talking.
You object. You know the rules. You just
lectured me about the rules, Counsel. So why
don't you play by the rules. Or only when they

Fit you? Why don't you grandstand a little more

17
now. Give us a five-minute speech, Mr. Leopold.
MR. LEOPOLD: Are you finished, for the
record.
MR. TEIN: I'm not talking to you. Do what
you want.
MR. LEOPOLD: Don't say anything yet.
BY MR. TEIN:
Q. a your parents --
MR. LEOPOLD: Hold it. Don't say anything
yet. Let me --
BY MR. TEIN:
Q. Your parents, who filed the police report
are also liars.
MR. LEOPOLD: Don't answer the question.
We're not going to answer until! | make the record.
| want to put on the record, now that Counse|
appears to be finished with his comments for the
record, that the previous question was
inappropriate, was intentiona!!ly misleading.
Now you can ask the question.
BY MR. TEIN:

Q. Your parents, who filed the police report
Page 100

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012495
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011324.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

21
H3VOGIU1

before or after Ms. Giuffre was abused by defendant is

irrelevant to this action and should b xcluded under Rul

401.
It is also, of course, highly prejudicial and should

b xcluded under Rule 403. Whether or not Ms. Giuffre ever

used drugs while not being abused by defendant does not go to
any claim or defenses in this case.

Courts in the Southern District of New York routinely

xclud vidence of prior drug use under both of these rules,
as fully briefed in the papers. Defendant attempts to admit
this evidence of prescription drug use related to damages,
specifically whether or not the emotional distress Ms. Giuffre

suffered is preexisting.

=

THE COURT: And why do you have it in your expert's

report?

MS. SCHULTZ: Well, our expert is -- I'm assuming
you're referring to Dr. Kliman, who is a physician. He's a
medical doctor. He took a full --

THE COURT: There's a whole thing about it. Are you

going to withdraw the --
MS. SCHULTZ: No, your Honor. We're only claiming

damages with respect to the emotional distress suffered from

the defamation. And also, taking drugs prescribed for various
mental health issues is not the same thing as emotional

distress. They're two different issues. So any marginal

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011324
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032902.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 11/9/2016 4:22:49 AM

To: Richard Kah
Subject: Re: Trump

Wow

On Wednesday, 9 November 2016, Richard Kahn (qq wrote:

Shocked but you seem to be right on don't count him out. Trump victory looking good and these pollsters like

fools...
Markets getting hit. Dow futures -700

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

Tel
Fax
Cell

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032902
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018091.txt,"championship of the Palestinian cause, themselves became the
enemies of the people, being crowned during the current
revolutionary period with infamy and dishonour. This applies to the
former regime in Iraq, the regime in Syria and the Mubarak regime in
Egypt.

The case of Hizbullah reflects this revolutionary predicament with
respect to the Palestinian cause and the struggle against Israel. It
suffices to recall which side this group came down upon when it had
to chose between the Syrian people, who are presently fighting for
their future and for the future of their children, and a regime that has
thrived off a conflict in which it has never fired a single shot to
liberate the Golan Heights from Israeli occupation, regardless of its
political posturing.

All this leads to the question of whether Netanyahu's new position is
based on some type of analysis of the ongoing Arab revolutions.
Does he believe that they will turn out to be like their predecessors
and feed off the Palestinian cause, for example, and has this led him
to want to deal firmly with them from the outset? Egypt received a
message to the effect that Al-Qaeda was in control of the Sinai and
that Israel therefore felt itself free to act as it wishes.

Alternatively, could Netanyahu's thinking be headed in another
direction, such that the current Arab revolutions are seeking to rectify
the fatal habit of previous revolutions of focussing on external affairs
at the expense of domestic needs and that they will therefore seek to
avert wars, conflicts and attendant tribulations?

Surely it is no coincidence that a leading Nasserist Arab nationalist
and presidential candidate, Hamdeen Sabahi, has stated several times
that he has no intention of opening hostilities against Israel and every
intention instead of waging war on poverty and fighting for
educational and healthcare reforms and other such urgent domestic
causes.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018091
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028080.txt,"By mid-December 1990, war was virtually certain. Misha and I had been to
Washington in September and agreed with the Americans that, unless we were
attacked by Saddam, we would stay out of it. To do otherwise was clearly not
just against the US-led coalition’s interests. Given the importance of our
alliance with Washington, it was against our inrerests as well. Yet with
hostilities obviously getting closer, Misha phoned Defense Secretary Dick
Cheney a few days later to remind him of the guid pro quo: we would be kept
fully in the loop about the details and timing of the initial American air strikes.
At around five o’clock on the afternoon on January 16, 1991, Misha got a call
from Cheney. He said “h-hour” would be at seven that evening Washington
time. Three a.m. in Israel.

Though we hoped to stay out, I’d now spent months coordinating and
overseeing preparations to ensure we could attack Saddam’s Scuds if necessary.
By far most of the missiles were mounted on mobile launching vehicles, and
Saddam was almost certainly going to be firing them from the vastness of Iraq’s
western desert. That meant an Israeli air strike alone wouldn’t work. We
decided on a joint air and ground operation, built around a newly created air-
mobile division and other special units. A force of 500 to 600 soldiers would
take control of key areas and road junctions in western Iraq and start hunting
and destroying, or at least impeding, the Scud launchers.

We also engaged in secret diplomacy in the hopes of reducing one of the
obvious risks in such an attack: a conflict with Jordan, which we’d have to
overfly to reach Iraq. The Mossad had a unit called 7evel, a kind of shadow
foreign ministry for states with which we had no formal relations but with
which, in both side’s interests, we had a channel of backdoor communications.
It was headed by Ephraim Halevy, a London-born Israeli who had come to
Palestine in 1948 as a teenager. He had built up a personal relationship with
King Hussein, and now arranged for us to meet him at a country residence
which the king had in Britain.

A few weeks before the war, I boarded a private jet to London along with
Halevy and Prime Minister Shamir. Shamir had never met the king before and
nor, of course, had I. But we didn’t talk about the forthcoming meeting on the
five-hour flight. Instead, Shamir opened up in a way I’d never seen: about his
childhood as part of a relatively well-off family in Poland; his love of literature,
and of the Bible. In a way, it reminded me of how my father had spoken to me
when I was growing up — minus the “well-off family” part.

232
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028080
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025853.txt,"Messay C L70N
Dove ton

I” pleased to present the fourth annual report from the Office of

Government Information Services (OGIS) detailing our fiscal year (FY)

2013 activities. We are extremely proud of all that OGIS has accomplished
in our four years of operation. We have put Congress’s novel idea—

applying Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques to an often highly
adversarial process—into action. We have assisted thousands of Freedom

of Information Act (FOIA) requesters from across the country and around >
the globe, along with dozens of agencies, in resolving disputes, some of

which would have otherwise led to costly litigation. We have worked with

agencies to better fulfill their responsibility to provide good customer

service, resolve disputes with FOIA requesters, and promote compliance

with FOIA.

Demand for OGIS’s services is high. Requests for assistance in resolving
FOIA disputes greeted me the morning the office opened four years ago. In
FY 2013, the number of incoming cases jumped 40 percent from the previous
year to more than 500 cases; at the same time, we closed nearly 500 cases—
also a 40-percent increase from the previous year—and handled hundreds of
inquiries by telephone and email.

Much work remains for our innovative program. While we have carried out
Congress’s mandate to review Federal agency FOIA policies, procedures, and
compliance in several ways, we would like to implement a more robust review

program. OGIS’s mission is broad, and like many government programs, we

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025853
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021787.txt,"To prosecutors, Mr. Epstein is just another sex offender. He did what he did because he
could, and because he never dreamed he would get caught, they say. Mr. Epstein’s
defenders counter that he has been unjustly persecuted because of his wealth and lofty
connections.

Sitting on his patio on “Little St. Jeff’s” in the Virgin Islands several months ago, as his
legal troubles deepened, Mr. Epstein gazed at the azure sea and the lush hills of St.
Thomas in the distance, poked at a lunch of crab and rare steak prepared by his personal
chef, and tried explain how his life had taken such a turn. He likened himself to Gulliver
shipwrecked among the diminutive denizens of Lilliput.

“Gulliver’s playfulness had unintended consequences,” Mr. Epstein said. ““That is what
happens with wealth. There are unexpected burdens as well as benefits.”

Those benefits are on full display on his island where, despite his time in jail, Mr. Epstein
has commissioned a new estate. The villa will occupy the island’s promontory, which
offers views of the Atlantic on one side and the Caribbean on the other. It will have a
separate library to house Mr. Epstein’s 90,000 volumes, a Japanese bathhouse and what
he calls a “Ziegfeld” movie theater.

For now, however, those visions of a private paradise have been replaced by the cold
reality of a jail cell.

The legal drama began in 2005, when a young woman who gave Mr. Epstein massages at
his Palm Beach mansion told the local police about the encounter. She was 14 at the time,
and was paid $200.

The police submitted the results of their investigation to the state attorney, asking that
Mr. Epstein be charged with sexual relations with minors. His lawyers say Mr. Epstein
never knew the young women were under age, and point to depositions in which the
masseuses — several of whom have filed civil suits — admitted to lying about their age.

In July 2005, a Florida grand jury charged Mr. Epstein with a lesser offense, soliciting
prostitution. Mr. Epstein’s legal team, which would eventually include the former
prosecutor Kenneth W. Starr and the Harvard law professor Alan M. Dershowitz, was
elated: Mr. Epstein would avoid prison.

But then the United States attorney’s office in Miami became involved. Last summer, Mr.
Epstein got an ultimatum: plead guilty to a charge that would require him to register as a
sex offender, or the government would charge him with sexual tourism, according to
people who were briefed on the discussions.

David Weinstein, an attorney in the government’s Miami office, declined to discuss the
specifics of the case. But he did address the subject of Mr. Epstein’s means and
prominent legal team, and dismissed a proposal by Mr. Epstein’s lawyers — who
opposed the application of federal statutes in the case — that he be confined to his house
in Palm Beach for a probationary period.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021787
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026913.txt,"3.2% (i.e. the cost of borrowing). Stocks typically struggle when the cost of borrowing exceeds the
nominal growth of the economy (see Exhibit 4). Second, the recent backup in interest rates was
driven primarily by improving real growth expectations, not higher inflation. This distinction is critical,
because higher rates in response to improving real growth tend to benefit earnings sufficiently to
overcome the downward pressure they place on valuation multiples. Finally, it will take a number of
years before higher rates meaningfully impact aggregate S&P 500 interest expense, considering 91%
of S&P 500 debt is fixed-rate and only 13% matures over the next two years.

4. Inflection Point for Negative Correlation Between Stock Prices and Bond
Yields

6

5.1

US 10-Year Treasury Yield (%)

Current Historical Since 1962 Adjusted for Today's
Lower Equilibrium Rate*

Yield at Which Stock Prices and
Rates Become Negatively Correlated

*Adjusts for the reduction of 1.25 percentage points in the long-run equilibrium nominal
rate, in line with the shift in Federal Reserve projections since 2012.

Source: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.

Low Probability of Recession

We continue to maintain a low, 10%, probability of recession driven by:
e The positive trend of leading economic indicators
e Low levels of inflation

e The continued slow but steady pace of Federal Reserve interest rate hikes. We believe that
Federal Reserve Chairman Powell’s recent commentary indicates that the FOMC will continue
to be driven by data and financial market conditions. Their stated goal is to extend this
expansion “indefinitely.”' While the Federal Reserve dots point towards four more interest rate
hikes by the end of 2019, we do not think that such hikes materially increase the odds of a
recession in an economy that continues to grow at levels that are generally regarded as above
trend growth in the US.

e Recent steepening of the yield curve. We have highlighted two measures of the yield curve as
sign-posts we watch as an early harbinger of a recession. Both have steepened since their
lows, as shown in Exhibits 5 and 6.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026913
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024595.txt,"destroy it.""

Are Qadhafi and other deposed leaders deluded in thinking all is
well in their kingdom or their country?

Deluded isn't quite the word, because if you're surrounded by a group
of sycophants who tell you what you want to hear, not what you need
to hear, you can be in touch with reality by psychological tests but
quite out of touch with reality politically. With Saddam Hussein, this
was particularly true—where to provide criticism of him was either to
lose your job or lose your life. Everyone was constantly praising him
and his brilliance, and he was spared wise council.

In addition to these circles of sycophants, is narcissism a common
trait among autocrats?

That is a wonderful question. I'm just putting the finishing touches on
my capstone book, which will be called Dreams of Glory: Narcissism
and Politics. | see narcissism as being a very powerful explanatory
factor for many of these leaders, who display a number of traits of
narcissism. One is they have a really exalted self-concept on the
surface, and are very sensitive to slight or any information to the
contrary. So they can get very angry if someone questions them.
Secondly, when there is something that shatters that image—and this
will be interesting to see what happens with Qadhafi—there can be
what's called a narcissistic rage. So, for example, with Saddam
Hussein as he was exiting Kuwait, lighting the oil wells on fire—that
was probably an example of that. Their interpersonal relationships
are very disturbed, and they surround themselves with people who
make them feel good. So that it is really a great hazard to in any way
criticize the leader. Qadhafi did a great deal to hollow out the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024595
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016902.txt,"When it comes to real robots helping real people, the standard definition of AI
fails us, for two fundamental reasons: First, optimizing the robot’s reward function in
isolation is different from optimizing it when the robot acts around people, because
people take actions too. We make decisions in service of our own interests, and these
decisions dictate what actions we execute. Moreover, we reason about the robot—that is,
we respond to what we think it’s doing or will do and what we think its capabilities are.
Whatever actions the robot decides on need to mesh well with ours. This is the
coordination problem.

Second, it is ultimately a human who determines what the robot’s reward function
should be in the first place. And they are meant to incentivize robot behavior that
matches what the end-user wants, what the designer wants, or what society as a whole
wants. I believe that capable robots that go beyond very narrowly defined tasks will need
to understand this to achieve compatibility with humans. This is the va/ue-alignment
problem.

The Coordination Problem: People are more than objects in the environment.

When we design robots for a particular task, it’s tempting to abstract people away. A
robotic personal assistant, for example, needs to know how to move to pick up objects, so
we define that problem in isolation from the people for whom the robot is picking these
objects up. Still, as the robot moves around, we don’t want it bumping into anything, and
that includes people, so we might include the physical location of the person in the
definition of the robot’s state. Same for cars: We don’t want them colliding with other
cars, so we enable them to track the positions of those other cars and assume that they’ ll
be moving consistently in the same direction in the future. A human being, in this sense,
is no different to a robot from a ball rolling on a flat surface. The ball will behave in the
next few seconds the same way it behaved in the past few; it keeps rolling in the same
direction at roughly the same speed. This is of course nothing like real human behavior,
but such simplification enables many robots to succeed in their tasks and, for the most
part, stay out of people’s way. A robot in your house, for example, might see you
coming down the hall, move aside to let you pass, and resume its task once you’ve gone
by.

As robots have become more capable, though, treating people as consistently
moving obstacles is starting to fall short. A human driver switching lanes won’t continue
in the same direction but will move straight ahead once they’ ve made the lane change.
When you reach for something, you often reach around other objects and stop when you
get to the one you want. When you walk down a hallway, you have a destination in
mind: You might take a right into the bedroom or a left into the living room. Relying on
the assumption that we’re no different from a rolling ball leads to inefficiency when the
robot stays out of the way if it doesn’t need to, and it can imperil the robot when the
person’s behavior changes. Even just to stay out of the way, robots have to be somewhat
accurate at anticipating human actions. And, unlike the rolling ball, what people will do
depends on what they decide to do. So to anticipate human actions, robots need to start
understanding human decision making. And that doesn’t mean assuming that human
behavior is perfectly optimal; that might be enough for a chess- or Go-playing robot, but
in the real world, people’s decisions are less predictable than the optimal move in a board
game.

99

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016902
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020499.txt,"40

For their part, American universities and US scholars have also engaged in China during
this period, although in far fewer—but not insignificant—numbers. (For example, in
2015-2016, 11,688 American students and scholars were studying in China.)° For those
in the field of Chinese studies, it is de rigueur to study and do research in Chinese
universities. Professional collaboration among faculty—mainly in the sciences and
medicine—has also flourished. Some US universities—notably Johns Hopkins School
of Advanced International Studies (Hopkins-Nanjing Center), New York University
(NYU-Shanghai), and Duke University (Duke-Kunshan)—have gone so far as to
establish campuses in China, while others have opened centers (e.g., Stanford, Virginia,
Chicago, Yale, Harvard, Columbia). Many more American universities have forged
collaborative exchange programs with Chinese counterparts.

While US-China exchanges in higher education have primarily been a success

story, as in many other dimensions of the Sino-American relationship, clouds have
appeared on the horizon.’ American students have become less keen than in the past
to study in China due to concerns about pollution, lack of open internet access, and
expanding political controls. American scholars trying to conduct research in China
have run into an increasing number of restrictions and impediments since 2010, due
to a broad campaign against “foreign hostile forces” and an increasingly draconian
political atmosphere that has cast a shadow across Chinese society, especially over
higher education. Whole subject areas and regions of the country are now off-limits
to American and other foreign scholars for fieldwork; previously normal interactions
with Chinese scholars are now often heavily circumscribed; many Chinese scholars
have become reluctant to meet with American counterparts; a growing number of
libraries are off-limits; central-level archives have been closed, and provincial; municipal
archives are increasingly restricted; interviews with government officials (at all levels)
are more difficult to arrange; public opinion surveys must be carried out with Chinese
partners, if they can be conducted at all; simple eyewitness social research in rural and,
even some urban areas, is considerably more limited than previously. In short, normal
scholarly research practices permitted elsewhere in the world are regularly proscribed
in China. These restrictions also include the inability to hold open and uncensored
public scholarly discussions, conferences, and other kinds of events. Meanwhile,
Chinese students and scholars enjoy unimpeded access to all of these activities in the
United States, resulting in a severe asymmetry in Sino-American scholarly exchange.
This contravenes the spirit of the bilateral US-China educational exchange accords.

At the same time, storm clouds are also gathering on American campuses with respect
to another aspect of this important relationship, namely, growing concerns about
unfair Chinese “influence-seeking activities” in the United States.

Universities

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020499
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011442.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

H3vlgiu2
that is one of the reasons why
this is a good rule of law,

that the Fifth Circuit reached

And LiButti

then goes
familiar, with laying out four

the nature of the relationship

is co-conspirators.
the conspiracy.
although this is a criminal en
Marcinkova are direct reports

conspiracy continues. This is

They're in th

to Ms.

The conspiracy continues to today,

139

in the Second Circuit they think

because they approve of the result

in that co-conspirator case.

on, as your Honor is well

different factors. The first is

involved. The relationship here

immediate next echelon of

They are direct reports in the business sense,

terprise, but Kellen and

Maxwell. Of course the

not just at the time of those

and your Honor is

the fact that they were evading service

events.
familiar with that from
while we were trying to obtain

Eventually they show up

is an Epstein lawyer; I

Mr. Goldberger,

with lawyers, a
think at some point

who's an attorney for Mr.

their testimony last year.

Bruce Reinhart I think

Ms. Marcinkova had

Epstein now. They've

both made significant efforts

in our view the conspiracy con

conspiracy is trying to conceal what was done to girls

Florida over an extended period of tim

continues through

also through

But there's more that

to evade servic Because

Why?

tinues to this day. The

in

The concealment

the efforts not only of the defendant but

the efforts of Kellen and Marcinkova.

binds them together

ven today.

Your Honor is of course familiar with the nonprosecution

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

(2:12 )

805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011442
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028615.txt,"communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

and may be unlawful. If you have received this
please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

EE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by

return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

ol

| Privileged - Redacted :
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028615
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026382.txt,"JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026382
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010984.txt,"Consider net gift. Its negative component, gift received, is concurrently added either
into total capital growth or into exhaust. Thus it is the contribution to those two
desiderata explained from outside, rather than by the individual’s behavior. Net gift
deducts that negative component (gift received) from the positive one to leave the
part which the individual’s behavior explains. Thus individual output, as the sum of
growth and net gift, is the sum of desiderata realized by behavior. That makes it the
unique behavioral maximand as a flow. Division by the individual’s total capital,
which is her whole means of behavior, gives total capital rate of return as the rate

maximand.

This can be summarized in a slightly different way. Cash flow measures the means of
taste satisfaction now. Total capital growth measures gain in means of expected
satisfactions, discounted according to our taste for impatience (time preference)
tempered by our taste for risk aversion. Output is their sum. Behavior reveals and
maximizes the taste satisfaction including provision for future satisfaction.
Therefore risk-adjusted output is the flow maximand. Capital of both factors, at
present value, is defined as the whole means of that satisfaction, and implicitly of
behavior. Therefore risk-adjusted return, the ratio of the flow maximand to its

means, is the rate maximand.

What Turgot said in 1766, in his Reflections, was

“...as soon as the profits of one employment of money... increase or
diminish, capitals turn in that direction... or withdraw and turn to other
employments... Whatever the manner in which money is employed, its
product cannot increase or diminish without all the other employments

experiencing a proportionate increase or diminution.”

Turgot did not allow for risk in this quick summary, but otherwise explained the

mechanics that tend to equalize return.

Chapter 3: Foundations 1/11/16 13

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010984
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032474.txt,"From: Michael Wolff 
Sent: 2/15/2017 1:31:07 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: A few favors... 
Importance: High 
Dear Jeffrey, You mentioned you were friends with Tom Barrack and I wondered if you might introduce me to 
him. As discussed, I'm doing a book on the first 100 days of the Trump White House--POTUS and key staff 
know all about it and are cooperating--and would love to chat with Tom on or off the record. Thanks in advance 
and look forward to seeing you soon. All best, Michael 
Michael Wolff 
Columnist, USA Today, The Hollywood Reporter, Vanity Fair, 
British GQ 
917-825-9659 
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle o some of the mess at the 
moment. everyone lawyering up in wash. . 
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Michael Wolff______________________________ wrote: 
So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT 
called me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I 
wonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and 
that I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy 
Ruemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. 
Are you in NYC soon? 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032474 
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032204.txt,"From: Multiple Senders [Multiple Senders]

Sent: 6/1/2019 12:36:57 PM
To: jeevacation

Subject: ass.dads -- 2019/06/01
jeevacation

06/01/2019 11:36:57 AM
trump coming to londong will be crazy

06/01/2019 11:48:33 AM
When ?

jeevacation
06/01/2019 11:49:49 AM
mon

06/01/2019 11:54:45 AM
I m leaving monday

Le
06/01/2019 11:54:45 AM
I m leaving monday

jeevacation
06/01/2019 12:48:09 PM
Good

06/01/2019 01:40:43 PM
Should i come to you , or wait for you here ?

jeevacation
06/01/2019 02:29:42 PM
Wait drive new car

06/01/2019 08:35:25 PM
Ok , i talked to dasha she said that NEXT week will be a lot of model in milan because of the season

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032204
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031725.txt,"Gloria Allred Says More Women Are Contacting Her About Trump
Misconduct

Gloria Allred in New York City in June 2016 (Getty Images)

Donald Trump's disgusting behavior towards women has ranged from fat-shaming to allegations of sexual
harassment, and, as we heard in the infamous ""hot mic"" audio from a 2005 Access Hollywood segment,
even sexual assault: ""You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It’s like
a magnet... And when you're a star, they let you do it, you can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy.""
Unsurprisingly, allegations are flying about much more dirty laundry yet to be aired, with reporters

chasing down possibly damaging evidence and looking for other victims.

Gloria Allred, the civil rights lawyer who takes on high-profile targets, like Bill Cosby, Roman Polanski
and, yes, Trump, confirmed to us that since the Access Hollywood tape's release, she has been ""contacted

by women who allege inappropriate contact by Mr. Trump.""

More to the point, Allred discussed how Trump's words suggest criminal behavior. ""If there is an
unwanted or unconsented to touching of a person’s intimate parts such as the genital areas or a woman’s
breasts, that could constitute a sexual assault or a sexual battery,” she explained yesterday. She added that

""when Rudy Giuliani was asked"" on Sunday's political programs ""if Donald Trump was describing a sexual
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031725
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021977.txt,"[TERSON

4 her meet him. What sort of a
| asks to meet her?”
had become friendly with the
ie was like a mother,” Bjorlin’s
s calling my house.
‘meet Epstein, but I did anyway,

th Nadia. He said he wanted to CHAPTER 40
Td like to be like a godfather’ It

_and said, ‘Stop!’ I told him, ‘No,
ur help. 1 kept Nadia away from

e never went anywhere with him.” y =
10k Epstein’s arrest to make Bjor- Leslie Wexner: 1993

Aaxwell and Epstein hadn't been

table of underage women.

eslie Wexner, the richest man in Ohio, is a proud midwest-
erner. Born into the rag trade (Wexner’s parents were
Russian-Jewish immigrants), he grew up to be a straight
shooter—taciturn and camera-shy.
For several years running, his 315-foot boat, the Limitless,
was the largest yacht owned by an American.
Wexner’s employees loved him, and he was known to be
fiercely loyal to them.
In time, he’d come to see the same qualities in Jeffrey Epstein.
“Everyone was mystified as to what [Epstein’s] appeal was,”
1 Says Robert Morosky, a former vice chairman of the clothing
 tetailer the Limited, founded by Wexner.
. “Almost everyone at the Limited wondered who he was,”
another former employee of Wexner’s recalls. “He literally came
""out of nowhere.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021977
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012163.txt,"12.

13.

14,

15.

16.

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

In August 2007, in a clear attempt to coerce a state settlement, Ms. Villafana threatened
to broaden the investigation to include a money laundering violation (18 U.S.C. § 1956),
though all the funds expended were simply Mr. Epstein’s, and a violation for operating an
unlicensed money-transmitting business (18 U.S.C. § 1960), though Mr. Epstein never
had such a business. See Tab 22, August 31, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to Ross
(reciting, in a target letter to one of Epstein’s employees, that the investigation concerns
“suspected violations of federal law, including but not limited to, possible violations of
Title 18, United States Code, Sections ... 1591, ... 1956, 1960... .’) (emphasis
added).

On the very same day that the grand jury issued subpoenas to the records-custodian and
employees of Epstein’s businesses for all financial transactions from 2003 forward, Ms.
Villafana (who we were told was not authorized to act in this regard without supervisory
approval) promised to close the money-laundering investigation “if the sex offense case
is resolved.” See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt (“In
other words, if the sex offense case is resolved, the Office would close its investigation
into other areas as well. The matter has not been, and it does not appear that it will be,
resolved so the money laundering investigation continues, and Request Number 6
[seeking records of every financial transaction conducted by Epstein and his six
businesses from “January 1, 2003 to the present”] will not be withdrawn.”).

Two weeks later, when Mr. Epstein continued to oppose federal prosecution during
negotiations and Mr. Epstein’s counsel sought a meeting with the United States Attorney,
AUSA Villafana then classified all of Mr. Epstein’s assistants as targets (sending a target
letter to one of them and promising the attorney of the other two that additional target
letters would be served on them as well), dispatched FBI agents to the homes of two of
his secretaries, and personally telephoned Mr. Epstein’s largest business client to advise
him of the nature of the investigation. See Tab 22, August 31, 2007 Letter from M.
Villafana to

FAUSA Sloman Forces Mr. Epstein’s Lawyers to Convince the State Prosecutors To

Impose a More Severe Sentence Than They Believe Is Appropriate

Throughout the plea negotiations with the USAO, Mr. Sloman and Ms. Villafana
continually insisted that the only way they would agree not to bring a federal indictment
was if Epstein’s lawyers, not the state prosecutors as required under the Petite Policy,
convinced the state prosecutors to impose a more severe punishment than the state
believed was appropriate under the circumstances.

FAUSA Sloman’s version of the history with respect to the sentence he required Mr.
Epstein’s lawyers to seek from the State contradicts his later assertion, which is patently
false—that “the SDFL indicated a willingness to defer to the State the length of
incarceration” and “considered a plea to federal charges that limited Epstein’s
sentencing exposure...” See Tab 1, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. Sloman. In fact, by a
email dated August 3, 2007, Criminal Division Chief Matthew Menchel advised the
defense that the federal government required a minimum term of two years of
incarceration. See Tab 40, August 3, 2007 Email from M. Menchel. Subsequently, Ms.

4

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012163
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837.txt,"From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 7:35 PM
To: Thomas Jr., Landon

Subject: Re: How are you holding up?
Importance: High

very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can
handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former
girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned , or subpeonaed. her name never
surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire QB time she
was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many
many times. she knew and remembers MEME She never saw anything that claims. She can

confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe
1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. .. they left message
after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it
was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she
knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud
as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that
these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave

massages outside on the terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say
otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, ..8. | answered the phones. served

coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Thomas Jr., Landon <i ii wrote:

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026849.txt,"From: Darren lndyke 
Sent: 5/20/2016 3:54:08 AM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (@stevenhoffenber) 
Importance: High 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: steven hoffenberg < 
Date: May 19, 2016 at 11:04:10 PM EDT 
To: 
Cc: Alan Fraade 
Subject: Fwd: Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (*stevenhoffenber) 
DARREN INDYKE ESQ. 
JEFF EPSTEIN IS AT HOME IN NEW YORK CITY HAVING SEX WITH UNDERAGE GIRLS TO 
DAY !!!!! 
THE TRUMP RACE WILL TELL ALL !!!!!!! 
GET READY FOR, 
HOFFENBERG VS JEFF EPSTEIN LAW SUIT IN FRONT OF FEDERAL COURT JUDGE ROBER 
T SWEET SDNY VERY SOON !!!!!! PONZI CRIMES AT TOWERS FINANCIAL BY JEFF 
EPSTEIN & STEVEN HOFFENBERG. 
JEFF EPSTEIN WILL FACE THE PONZI CRIMES IN THE ABOVE LAW SUIT VERY SOON. 
YOU ARE CRAZY FOR NOT SETTLING THE ABOVE CASE RIGHT NOW WITH THE TOWERS 
VICTIMS WHO YOU DID LEGAL WORK FOR WITH ROBERT GOLD ESQ. 
THINK NOW AS THE ABOVE LAW SUIT FINAL DRAFT MAY BE READY TO FILE NEXT W 
EEK. 
PLEASE ASK JEFF EPSTEIN TO STAY AT HIS HOME 
IN NYC FOR THE LAW SUIT SERVICE ON JEFF EPSTEIN BY THE PROCESS SERVER WHO 
WILL BE AT 9 EAST 71 STREET NYC TO SERVE JEFF EPSTEIN VERY SOON. 
TOTAL COVERAGE OF THE LAW SUIT WILL BE PICKED UP BY ALL OF THE MEDIA AT T 
HE FEDERAL COURT IN NEW YORK CITY. 
HAVE A NICE DAY MR INDYKE 
Steven J. Hoffenberg 
New York Post Publishing INC. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026849 
CEO 
WHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS 
TOWERSINVES TORS .COM  
CEO 
SEE 
WWW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER 
MR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER 
PUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM  
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Stevenhoffenberg <______________ 
Date: May 19, 2016 at 10:43:26 PM EDT 
To: 
Subject: Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (*stevenhoffenber) 
i> 
:41772.r. 
steven hoffenbergw ((&,stevenhoffenber) 
5/19/16, 10:42 PM  
CLINTON CRIMES RAPING LITTLE GIRLS TRUMP SUPER PAC GET OUR JOBS BACK INC ADS 
SHOWS CLINTON CRIMES 
Download the official Twitter app here 
Steven J. Hoffenberg 
New York Post Publishing Inc. 
CEO 
WHAM INC. THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS 
TOWERSINVESTORS.COM  
CEO 
SEE 
POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER 
MR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER 
PUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026850 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030072.txt,"13

implementation. Frequent changes in governments, plans, and
priorities have all contributed to the failure of the reform process in
Jordan over the past decade. In view of the recent uprisings in the
Arab world, the political elite must recognize that the only way they
can retain power is by sharing it, and governments will have to
acknowledge that substituting serious implementation with reform
rhetoric fools no one. Given that Jordan enjoys a rather distinctive
position-its monarchy enjoys widespread legitimacy and plays a role
in stability that is acknowledged by all sectors of society, including
the opposition-the king is in a unique position to lead a serious
reform process. The choice in Jordan seems to be similar to that of
other countries around it: either lead a reform process from above in a
gradual, orderly, and serious way, or watch it take place in the streets
below with uncontrolled consequences.

Marwan Muasher is vice president for studies at the Carnegie
Endowment, where he oversees the Endowment’s research in
Washington and Beirut on the Middle East. Muasher served as
foreign minister (2002—2004) and deputy prime minister
(2004-2005) of Jordan, and his career has spanned the areas of
diplomacy, development, civil society, and communications. He is
also a senior fellow at Yale University.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030072
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029523.txt,"Palm House Robert Matthews EB-5 Clintons Trump Tony Bennett https://therealdeal.com/miami/issues_articles/lost-paradise-at-th...

4 of 10

~ ""SOUTH FLORIDA REAL ESTATE NEWS
Q SUBSCRIBE MY ACCOUNT

investors generally function as individual lenders on those projects, but they rarely
have a way to collect money if the project fails.

“This is not unlike any other industry that

can produce a toxic product like the opioid

industry or the tobacco industry.
There is a powerful interest involved.”

“The whole thing has to do with corralling desperate people in China, who believe

that Americans wouldn't lie to them out right,” Litowitz said.

And while the program was designed to create jobs in rural and distressed regions
known as “targeted employment areas,” communities like Palm Beach — a top
destination for wealthy retirees with a median household income of more than

$110,000 — somehow met the same criteria.

Florida's Department of Economic Opportunity approved the Palm House project for
such a designation in 2012 because Palm Beach had an unemployment rate of 18.5
percent, above “the qualifying rate of 13.4 percent for that time period,’ according to
the state agency. Other EB-5 projects, including Hudson Yards in New York, the
largest private real estate development in the country, were also able to take

advantage of similar demographics.

Without mentioning his past dealings in Connecticut or in Nantucket, Matthews
touted his wife Mia Matthews’ success as an actress, singer and star of the
Nickelodeon show “Every Witch Way” and CW’s “South Beach,” which lasted all of
one season. To further show off his connections and status in Palm Beach, he would
take EB-5 immigration agents from China to a Mar-a-Lago charity event to meet
Trump and take picture with him, according to a complaint filed by EB-5 investors in

Palm Beach County Court.

The developer’s investment pitch also failed to mention that it was actually his

second time acquiring the Palm House. And there was no mention of the fact that

6/26/19, 11:57 AM

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029523
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010774.txt,"Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case No.: CACE 15-000072

Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records

Page 18 of 20

COUNSEL LIST

SEAN D. REYES
Utah Attorney General

By: JONI J. JONES
JOEL A. FERRE
Assistant Utah Attorneys General

Bradley J. Edwards

FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING,
EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Telephone (954) 524-2820

Facsimile (954) 524-2822

E-mail: brad@pathtojustice.com

And

Paul G. Cassell

Pro Hac Vice Motion Pending

S.J. Quinney College of Law at the
University of Utah

383 S. University St.

Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Telephone:801-585-5202

Facsimile:801-585-6833

E-Mail:cassellp@law.utah.edu

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell

Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr., Esquire

Thomas.scott@csklegal.com; Steven.safra@csklegal.com

Cole Scott & Kissane P.A.

9150 S Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400

Miami, FL 33156

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010774
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019088.txt,"Are Rape Jokes Funny?

Abortion was still illegal in 1970. At the time, as both an
underground abortion referral service and a stand-up satirist, | faced an
undefined paradox. | wouldn’ t allow victims to become the target of my
humor, yet there was one particular routine | did that called fora “rape-
in” of legislators’ wives in order to impregnate them so that they would
then convince their husbands to decriminalize abortion.

When abortion was against the law, | thought it would never be
legalized in my lifetime. But then, after Roe vs Wade | thought abortion
would never be ///ega/ again. So now, in 2012, it's been disheartening to
see the right-wing religious conservative movement that supposedly wants
to keep government out of our lives, while simultaneously promulgating
compulsory transvaginal ultrasound probes, in the process of trying to re-
criminalize reproduction rights in my lifetime.

Things seem to be going backward. The Dinosaur Follies--better
known as the Republican presidential primaries—were bizarre and
surrealistic. Most despicable was the way they all pandered to their

fanatical anti-choice constituents. My unofficial Campaign Pandering

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019088
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029245.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Elisa New

Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature
Harvard University

148 Barker Center

12 Quincy Street

Cambridge, MA

02138

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029245
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019936.txt,"Kushner, going concave, retreated from the discussion.

Trump, changing the topic, said to Scarborough and Brzezinski, “So what about you
guys? What’s going on?” He was referencing their not-so-secret secret relationship.

Scarborough and Brzezinski said it was all still complicated, and not public, officially,
but it was good and everything was getting resolved.

“You guys should just get married,” prodded Trump.

“T can marry you! I’m an Internet Unitarian minister,” Kushner, otherwise an Orthodox
Jew, said suddenly.

“What?” said the president. “What are you talking about? Why would they want you to
marry them when / could marry them? When they could be married by the president! At
Mar-a-Lago!”

7 OK Ok

Almost everybody advised Jared not to take the inside job. As a family member, he would
command extraordinary influence from a position that no one could challenge. As an
insider, a staffer, not only could his experience be challenged, but while the president
himself might not yet be exposed, a family member on staff would be where enemies and
critics might quite effectively start chipping from. Besides, inside Trump’s West Wing, if
you had a title—that is, other than son-in-law—people would surely want to take it from
you.

Both Jared and Ivanka listened to this advice—from among others it came from Jared’s
brother, Josh, doubly making this case not only to protect his brother but also because of
his antipathy to Trump—but both, balancing risk against reward, ignored it. Trump
himself variously encouraged his son-in-law and his daughter in their new ambitions and,
as their excitement mounted, tried to express his skepticism—while at the same time
telling others that he was helpless to stop them.

For Jared and Ivanka, as really for everybody else in the new administration, quite
including the president, this was a random and crazy turn of history such that how could
you not seize it? It was a joint decision by the couple, and, in some sense, a joint job. Jared
and Ivanka had made an earnest deal between themselves: if sometime in the future the
time came, she’d be the one to run for president (or the first one of them to take the shot).
The first woman president, Ivanka entertained, would not be Hillary Clinton, it would be
Ivanka Trump.

Bannon, who had coined the Jarvanka conflation now in ever greater use, was horrified
when the couple’s deal was reported to him. “They didn’t say that? Stop. Oh come on.
They didn’t actually say that? Please don’t tell me that. Oh my god.”

And the truth was that at least by then Ivanka would have more experience than almost

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019936
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030795.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 8/18/2018 4:54:58 PM 
To: Steve Bannon___________________________ 
Subject: Re: The Anatomy of a Crisis: A Strong Dollar and Disappearing Liquidity I Zero Hedge I Zero Hedge 
In recent weeks, prosecutors with the Justice Department's public integrity section — which examines possible 
political and government corruption — have sought documents related to Broidy's business dealings. 
Among the information sought by investigators are details about Broidy's work on behalf of and interactions 
with the Chinese and Malaysian officials, according to two people familiar with the document requests. 
As part of their efforts, prosecutors have subpoenaed casino magnate Steve Wynn, the former RNC finance 
chairman and longtime Trump friend, for copies of records and communications related to Broidy. 
An attorney for Wynn, Reid Weingarten, declined to comment, saying only that Wynn is cooperating with the 
Justice Department. 
""Steve Wynn is completely cooperating with the investigation and he certainly has no reason to believe that 
anyone acted improperly in anything he knew about or was involved in,"" Weingarten said in a statement. 
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Steve Bannon > wrote: 
Wow: decent; from a guy I have a ton of respect for 
On Aug 18, 2018, at 12:27 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
this means that you should ignore advice not given by jews. :) it is nonsense. each one of these guys 
decides to put in pin the carousel and say the horse is up , the horse isgoing down or the horse is going 
up. strong dollars make it easier to invest in emerging markets , as their currency is really worth shit and 
needs to be adequately priced, but in the mean time. there is apple in the us and maduro in venezuela. 
. what do you expect from the currencies. :) 
Reid weingarten review of msnbc "" even though an is gay, hard to watch steve rape him. 
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Steve Bannon wrote: 
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-16/anatomy-crisis-strong-dollar-and-disappearing-liquidity 
Wat does this mean 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030795 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030796 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016292.txt,"its learning, will in no way be obliged to make such decisions as we should have made, or
will be acceptable to us.”) Apparently, the original dissidents promulgating the AI-risk
message were the AI pioneers themselves!

Evolution’s Fatal Mistake

There have been many arguments, some sophisticated and some less so, for why the
Control Problem is real and not some science-fiction fantasy. Allow me to offer one that
illustrates the magnitude of the problem:

For the last hundred thousand years, the world (meaning the Earth, but the
argument extends to the solar system and possibly even to the entire universe) has been in
the human-brain regime. In this regime, the brains of Homo sapiens have been the most
sophisticated future-shaping mechanisms (indeed, some have called them the most
complicated objects in the universe). Initially, we didn’t use them for much beyond
survival and tribal politics in a band of foragers, but now their effects are surpassing
those of natural evolution. The planet has gone from producing forests to producing
cities.

As predicted by Turing, once we have superhuman AI (“the machine thinking
method”), the human-brain regime will end. Look around you—you’ re witnessing the
final decades of a hundred-thousand-year regime. This thought alone should give people
some pause before they dismiss AI as just another tool. One of the world’s leading AI
researchers recently confessed to me that he would be greatly relieved to learn that
human-level AI was impossible for us to create.

Of course, it might still take us a long time to develop human-level AI. But we
have reason to suspect that this is not the case. After all, it didn’t take long, in relative
terms, for evolution—the blind and clumsy optimization process—to create human-level
intelligence once it had animals to work with. Or multicellular life, for that matter:
Getting cells to stick together seems to have been much harder for evolution to
accomplish than creating humans once there were multicellular organisms. Not to
mention that our level of intelligence was limited by such grotesque factors as the width
of the birth canal. Imagine an AI developer being stopped in his tracks because he
couldn’t manage to adjust the font size on his computer!

There’s an interesting symmetry here: In fashioning humans, evolution created a
system that is, at least in many important dimensions, a more powerful planner and
optimizer than evolution itself'is. We are the first species to understand that we’re the
product of evolution. Moreover, we’ve created many artifacts (radios, firearms,
spaceships) that evolution would have little hope of creating. Our future, therefore, will
be determined by our own decisions and no longer by biological evolution. In that sense,
evolution has fallen victim to its own Control Problem.

We can only hope that we’re smarter than evolution in that sense. We are
smarter, of course, but will that be enough? We’re about to find out.

The Present Situation

So here we are, more than half a century after the original warnings by Turing, Wiener,
and Good, and a decade after people like me started paying attention to the AI-risk
message. I’m glad to see that we’ve made a lot of progress in confronting this issue, but
we're definitely not there yet. AI risk, although no longer a taboo topic, is not yet fully

72

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016292
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023297.txt,"after weeks of requesting? odd. when you suggested that heathers behavior was emblematic of a sloppy
office , brad said lets not talk about emblems??! bill pay , admittedly no change for the year. . plane not
done. though it was the only thing i suggested doing first in july. . I sent you a list of 10 consultantts. brad said
three, . 1 didnt want to push it. I was shocked that brad was opining on things he knows little or nothing
about. tax issues. 1031. neg basis , note payoffs ( the same idea he said he had had from the beggining??!!)
. answers re LBF holdings that can be corrected (they cant) . valuations that have never been read. . When
we met in your lobby he seems surprised that 1 was there. I dont know if he felt somewhat sandbagged. ..
the savings on the note payoff is aprrox 33 % of 1.8 billion. real money if you do phaidon which i see no
reason not to . if later josh and ben want to buy it back with you or without you they can. i will walk you
through the structure one on one. . the losses will offeset the calder gain as well as apollo gain.

Im aware that seeing what you saw frustrated you. I felt badly for you.

You wanted a contingent deal. real value. etc. I will not of course hold you to your deal .. its silly. its not
how i work or a reflection of our friendship. my proposal is as follows. I want away from your buisiness , but
at the same time leaving you in good shape. __I think you should pay the 25m that you did not for this

year. for next year its the same 40 m as always, paid 20 in jan and 20 injuly, and then we are done. I will give
you advice and counsel but new people will be running your operating machine. I will oversee all the work
that needs to be done you and I will hire new people , and it will be self running. ( it was may in my house
when you told brad it had been 5 months and you were getting fed up ) I will set up a parallel . office , somenoe
like wendy dolman or her quality is paramount. two accountants two bookeepers and two office

admins. . alan and zoe will handle trusts and grats. heatehr diana george will be incolved in art partnership. if
you want brad, analysts etc. and kids to do investments I have little to add in that regard ,except to be able to
account for things properly. I suggest that the kids must have skin in any deal.

Alternatively , we can continue to focus on fun and let someone else do the things that you want done. and
you and I can kibbitz about it all. structures outcomes risk, museums. charity, ( joslins answer by the way
was I had asked how much charity was leon planining to give this year , (the 2m) he didnt include your
foundation or the payment to me, or from debra and you??!!

Date: Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:39 PM

Subject: Fee

To: Melanie Spinella

Amount ? Paid in kind ? Financed ? Plane ?Paid to ? Non charity , charity . Fixed dates

Date: Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:05 PM

Subject:

To: Melanie Spinella

please re iterate that no further actions taken without careful document review. please

Subject:
To: Melanie Spincl ii
Leon,

As you are well aware, There is little I won't do for you, or at least try to do asa friend, and a great deal that
I have already done ( both known and some things that willneed to remain unknown.) Our arrangement was
for me to architect sophisticated structures that would be beneficial to you. that is what I have done and will
continue do in order to fulfill my obligations under our agreement. The discovered fact that you in reality
need an entire family office built from scratch has been trying Ihave aleady agreed de- facto to try
to help. Iwould suggest that Phaidons payroll and attention pales in importance to your personal
structure,which has taken a back seat, Some of my suggestions regarding the Eysium office are as
follows you will need a budget of 3- 5 million per year. CEO 1 million, new tax person to work with rich,
250. new bookkeeper ,200 new paralegal to work with ADA ALan etc , coordinating with Apollo, Akin , paul
weiss , new acct openings, sec filings , sales tax review, etc. $150. art point person. loan , inventory,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023297
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015943.txt,"Software 253

mathematician, he managed to prove this conjecture and so, two years
after first announcing that he had solved Fermat's Last Theorem he could
finally lay it to rest.

The Special Purpose Objection

Before I declare mankind’s outright victory over computers, the Special
Purpose Objection must be overcome. The objectors would argue that
Wiles is a Special Purpose computer. Special Purpose computers are at
no risk of breaking the Turing limit when they solve problems they have

Theorem (Undecidability of Hilbert’s tenth problem)

There is no algorithm which, for a given arbitrary Diophantine
equation, would tell whether the equation has a solution or not.

been programmed to answer. The objection misses the key point. I am
not arguing having a solution to a given mathematical puzzle presents a
difficulty to a computer; I am arguing a computer cannot discover one.

Take, for example, the search engine Google. If I type “where can
I find the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem?” into the search box, it will
retrieve a PDF of the proof as the third result. It appears this special
purpose computer solved the problem. But you immediately see the
difficulty. Google search already knew the answer, or more precisely had
indexed the answer. The computer was not tackling a random problem
from scratch. It was tackling a problem for which it knew the answer, or
at least where an answer could be found. There is no sense in which the
search engine discovered the proof.

To really understand this objection we need to examine exactly
what Turing and Matiyasevich proved.

An arbitrary problem is one you do not already know the solution
to when you write the algorithm. You can think of it as a variable. Is
there an algorithm that can solve problem ‘X’? The alternative is a special
program. It can solve problem Y. Y is a problem it knows. It must have
the solution coded somewhere within it in a computably expandable way.
You might think of this as a table of constants; problem Y has solution
1, problem Z has solution 2, and so on. But it could be more subtle than
that. Problem Y might have a solution which is encrypted so you cannot
recognize it within the program, or it might even be the result of some

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015943
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014485.txt,"As we outline below, we think it is just a matter of timing. The political certainty created
by the swift election of Theresa May plus the Bank of England’s interventions have
delayed, rather than resolved, the underlying uncertainties caused by the vote.

Chart 53: UK PMls tanked post-Brexit but have recovered Chart 54: While retail sales have remained strong
10
65

Oct retail

Average 8
since 2010

60 6
4
55 2
0 °
sa ———= Composite PMI 2 4
Epp. % ami 4 Consumer confidence BAML est. of
——— GDP, % qoq, prelimina - Real consumption, %yoy confidence if
45 estimates (rhs) ; 6 Retail sales volumes. ex fuel,.% yoy inflation
is i)
Mar-10 Mar-11| Mar-12 Mar-13 Mar-14 Mar-15 Mar-16 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 20f2°*2o16
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Markit, ONS. Retail sales volumes. Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, GfK, ONS.
2017: Falling growth, negotiations and a consumer squeeze
We think there are clear warning signs that conditions are deteriorating, uncertainty is
set to return and a consumer squeeze is coming for the UK.
Falling growth to compound deficit problems
Real gdp is only expected to fall 0.1% in 2016 vs the March forecast. But the UK Office
of Budgetary Responsibility expects growth to slip by 0.8% next year (2.2% to 1.4%) and
0.4% on 2018 (2.1% to 1.7%) vs March. A notable slice of this is can be attributed to the
OBR’s estimate that Brexit added £59bn to UK borrowing to 2022, or nearly £200mn a
week. These numbers include Phillip Hammond’s sensible but small measures. Our UK
economist is more pessimistic forecasting 0.9% in 2017 and 0.7% in 2018. Even if we
split the two, that represents a 50% decline in expected 2017 gdp and 40% decline in
2018. The OBR also expects public sector net debt to hit its highest level since 1964-65
in 2017-18 at a time when the UK already relies on “the kindness of strangers” to
finance its growing twin deficit.
26 European Equity Strategy | O1 December 2016 orate 2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014485
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031043.txt,"Senders Po

Time: 01/26/18 02:07:27 AM (538654047)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 69AD9E66-E612-41B5-8F2B-FDDED7BFDO75
Message: Great. Thanks.

Sender: Po

Time: 01/26/18 02:07:41 AM (538654061)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 79477044-3013-4FBA-BBE2-6F390D06DF19
Message: U not in davos

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 01/26/18 02:08:04 AM (538654084)
Flags: 1093637

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: B/7B54956-1B47-4C33-BB1A-4276778E8D65
Messag There are only 5

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 01/26/18 02:09:30 AM (538654170)
Flags: 1093637

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: C08219DC-C92D-40CF-A1LAF-D907E66CDFE8
Message: No - my Paris house has been suburb of meetings GREAT fun No ties or
pretense

Sender: Po

Time: 01/26/18 02:10:16 AM (538654216)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8EE713DB-13D4-4364-89E1-1841654AEFA2
Message: Thanks.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 01/26/18 02:10:17 AM (538654217)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031043
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023283.txt,"2 .to engage the second phase if youso choose , and considering there is only 8 more to be paid this
year in oct, for the job now almost completed, total of 23. that was agreed only for history fix.

3. with the necessary proprietary protections , proposal is for first year only an additional 17 . making it 40
, but full year balance on signing , ie 25. takes care of 2013

4, moving forward , 40 per year ,( approx | percent ) for three years, to be credited against an agreed
formula. Im open to suggestions total approx 120 for new workover 3 years , benefits to you over the
next 20.

5, can consider interests other than cash as payment. ?

6. need to speak re , bankers, valuations, mechanics and their continued importance.

Date: Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:38 AM

Subject:
To: Melanie Spinella (i ii i i>
Office, - adagoes. , hire heather a paralegal. Joslin goes or is closely managed by new cfo with tax

experience. . castrucii goes asap.as he merely adds to mess.( too many people , ex 7 people or more to
pay a bill) eva goes. outsource as much as possible... bookkeeping systems built from scratch,

airplane restructure, boat . same, new grats. phaidon sale , decide on artspace survivability, regan, . do
the kids really want these? , children accounting ie bens house.etc. re do estate for new facts. redo
loans, trading accounts activity, . gaming -foreign- disclosures. . BRH TRA re thinks . household and
construction architects. . redone. art partnership , choice of paintings. . re do structure of consultants.
tax re family office... decide if investments are a realistic option in the next three years.. insurance.
operations. airplane , etc. . art foundation , private. max charity contributions. financial reports. still
waiting. ? on line banking, . tax planning, family office deductions ( profit center ) . airplane certificate,
redone jet aviationredo. . paper gigi ( E )trust to avoid gift tax. .

today is Oct 15

With your full knowledge I paid out 8 mil to my staff before june, . soi guess I can safely assume that
after consideration of all the things I did for the entire past year separate and apart from your unique free
""after care"" concept. , what you thought was ultimately fair was the contribution of 5 million to a
foundation and a total of 2 million dollars to me.

Date: Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:08 PM

Subject:

To: Melanie Spinella <

I think you should consider the fact that your family office will be the most central component of what you
leave to your children , wife heirs. it is the core of your assets. your art might be sold. your houses may
lie empty, the apollo stock could be sold. you will pass on your office , . it will be the primary player in
your estate tax. probate, transition. Brad has taken it from aD minus toaC minus, IfI were youl
would set the goal of an A. just like your paintings. . Like a house you could attempt to renovate it. it
will take more time and money. or. in essence as I suggested in dec of 13, start from scratch. A
financail head of office. - brad could move to being richards replacment as trustee. . barry cohen would
be perfect but carries the trustee taint now. . take a tax partner from a major firm. to replace joslin,
cost 1+ mil . keep heather and ssmantha. . bring in full time IT person. ASAP . your lighting
contractor in your new townhouse has better IT than your multi billlion dollar antique opersation. data
breaches are not your concern. precision is. . either re do the office layout . or get enterly new space.
the proposals to focus on following on a monthly basis the values of all your current investments is an
example of misplaced prioirties. . Your office is the heart of the familys financial life and temp future,
it needs a heart operation

Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:10 PM

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023283
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015957.txt,"Software 267

Horizontal abstraction is the simpler of the two to understand,
and the more common. Computer systems are built ‘on the shoulders of
giants. That is to say we no longer need to place individual pixels onto
the computer screen. We can assume a computer will draw a square if we
specify the dimension and coordinates of the center. That’s abstraction.
Today’s computers are even more helpful. We can ask them to draw a
rotating cube lit from a certain angle and the computer will do the whole
job for us. But, there are always practical limitations to this.

I want my cubes to move around the screen naturally but I am not
sure what physics model has been implemented. What will happen when
they bump into each other? If the abstraction is not thoroughly thought
through they pass through each other in a very odd way, breaking up
and showing me they are really made of triangles, the illusion of three
dimensions is lost. Whenever we work at an abstract level, we risk being
exposed to its inner guts at some point. Joel Spolsky, a computer scientist
who worked on Microsoft Excel, proposed the Law of Leaky Abstractions
to explain this. An example of his law in action is the TCP/IP protocol
stack that transports data over the Internet. The stack is hugely reliable,
yet I have to debug one of these stacks at least four times a year!

The problem is that the TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is
designed to provide reliable delivery of information: internet pages,
my bank account and the like. But, the internet protocol ‘IP’ on which
it relies is only designed for best-efforts. When a link loses a packet of
information, the TCP has to retransmit it. This takes additional time. TCP
provides an abstraction of a reliable connection, but the implementation
is not as robust as it may seem, and the details leak through as variable
latency and throughput. This explains why your web pages sometimes
do not completely render. You are told it is reliable, but often it is not!
Experience is so valuable to a programmer because they know which of
these specifications to take with a pinch of salt and when they are likely
to leak. They are battle scarred by previous naivety.

I think Spolsky’s Law follows from Rice’s Theorem and ultimately
from Turing’s no halting proof. If leak-less abstraction was possible you
could, in principle, write a recursive partial halting solution. By layering
abstraction on top of abstraction you would be able to solve some very
complex problems, eventually including the Halting Problem. We know
this is impossible, so non-leaky abstraction cannot exist.

The other method of splitting software is vertically. This is often
done following the natural boundaries of an organization: functional or
geographic. Again there will be leakage between the systems; the data
you get from the finance department might not be detailed enough for

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015957
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031057.txt,"Is Invitation: No

GUID: E697A602-4933-48EF-AB90-2D825CB23768

Message: The good news is they are getting him resign by finding illegality rather than

doing what they did to JFK

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/24/18 08:42:15 AM (556818135)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F3B2FFD3-3CE6-4DBE-823E-58084A5FCOB1

Message: Yup

Time: 08/24/18 02:55:50 PM (556840550)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7885DB90-F4D6-44BE-9184-FF2D8DBEOD78

Message: Jeff I apologize for tonight I'm having a hard time getting down there with
the traffic. I'm up in northern Connecticut trying to unload my son Dorm

Sender: iy

Time: 08/24/18 02:56:03 PM (556840563)
Flags: 1126401
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F886E130-ADDC-4EC1-BC28-9817A4D35A9A

Message: I have to take a rain check for tonight.

get back from your trip after September 15?

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/24/18 02:56:34 PM (556840594)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7E9CS9CF-822F-459C-BD73

Tr

‘DOE 7EBDO995

Message: no worry easy

sender:

Time: 08/24/18 02:57:14 PM (556840634)
Flags: 1126401
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

Can I take you guys to Rao's when you

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031057
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015529.txt,"﻿10/5/2015 Jeffrey Epstein 'sex slave' Virginia Roberts was a 'money­hungry sex kitten', ex friends claim | Daily Mail Online
'millionaire's house' for a day or two, before returning with cash.
He did say that she tried to get out of the sex business, but was dragged back in.
Last month it was revealed Roberts accused two male acquaintances she was raped, bringing her
credibility into question.
Roberts' lawyers says the latest allegations do not contend the fact she was used for underage sex.
Attorney Sigrid McCawleysaid : 'To say that our client acquiesced in this abuse, or that the abuse
was OK because she was paid for it — leaves out the fact that this is why we have laws in the United
States to protect minor children who are groomed and sexually trafficked by adults.'
Epstein served 13 months in a Florida prison after pleading guilty in 2008 to soliciting a minor for
prostitution.
and booted as she
heads out to work in
elegant pinstriped
ensemble
George's better half
'He can go f***
himself': Kris Jenner's
rant over Caitlyn's
negative portrayal of her
in Vanity Fair article....
on Keeping Up With The
Kardashians
Her sun and stars!
Emilia Clarke reunites
with former Game of
Thrones love interest
Jason Momoa during
Paris Fashion Week
Two looked very close
It's in the genes! Meg
Ryan's son Jack Quaid
cracks up his famous
mom as they enjoy a
Sunday stroll in New
York City
Had his mom in stitches
From matching tattoos
and annual weddings to
gifts of $40 million
private jets, the craziest
things celebrities have
done for love
Sponsored
Attached at the hip!
Christie Brinkley, 61,
radiates as she and new
boyfriend John
Mellencamp leave hotel
in NYC... following date
the night before
Allegations: The 31­year­old is currently in the midst of a lawsuit claiming she was recruited to join Epstein's
harem of underage women in 1999, naming Prince Andrew and attorney Alan Dershowitz as two of the men
she was made to 'service'
SHARE THIS
ARTICLE
133 shares
RELATED ARTICLES
Fugitive American sect
leader arrested in Brazil
over...
Revenge porn
blackmailer threatened
to tell married
woman's...
The scandal resurfaced in January when Roberts named Prince Andrew in a lawsuit, accusing him
of using her for underage sex.
According to court records connected with Roberts' current lawsuit, she maintains that she was
recruited to join Epstein's harem in 1999 by his friend, the socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.
She says during the three years she worked for Epstein, she was made to entertain his friends and
named Prince Andrew and Dershowitz as two men she had sex with.
Both men have denied having sex with Roberts, and Dershowitz is trying to get his name removed
from the suit, claiming Roberts made the entire story up.
+2
Disgraced entertainer
Rolf Harris to be
stripped of his CBE...
SPONSORED Make a
career out of your
hobby?
Fergie vehemently defends Prince Andrew against 'defamation'
f
'She's lost her spark':
Sir Tom Jones reveals
his reclusive wife's
battle with depression
but insists their
marriage is 'solid' after
58 years
Emily Blunt reveals
she became US citizen
for tax reasons after
sparking outrage by
saying she regretted the
decision following a
Republican debate
Christina Milian shows
off her curves and pert
derriere in a skimpy
animal print bikini while
cavorting with a
mystery male in Miami
Barely there two­piece
The art of the fake baby
bump: Celebrities' most
convincing on­screen
pregnancies (and how
SEE WHAT`S IN STORE AT
WASHINGTON DC
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article­2974613/Jeffrey­Epstein­sex­slave­money­hungry­sex­kitten­enjoyed­role­travelling­masseuse­former­friends­clai… 2/21
EXHIBIT G
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 12
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO:_____________________
v.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
________________________________/
COMPLAINT
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
575 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 446-2300
1
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 12
Plaintiff, VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, formerly known as Virginia Roberts
(“Giuffre”), for her Complaint against Defendant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL (“Maxwell”), avers
upon personal knowledge as to her own acts and status and otherwise upon information and
belief:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This suit arises out of Defendant Maxwell’s defamatory statements against
Plaintiff Giuffre. As described below, Giuffre was a victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while
she was a minor child. Defendant Maxwell not only facilitated that sexual abuse but, most
recently, wrongfully subjected Giuffre to public ridicule, contempt and disgrace by, among other
things, calling Giuffre a liar in published statements with the malicious intent of discrediting and
further damaging Giuffre worldwide.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum
jurisdictional limits of this Court.
3. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332
(diversity jurisdiction) as Giuffre and Maxwell are citizens of different states and the amount in
controversy exceeds seventy-five thousand ($75,000), exclusive of interest and costs.
4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Maxwell. Maxwell resides in New York
City, and this action arose, and defamatory statements were made, within the Southern District of
New York.
5. Venue is proper in this Court as the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of
this Court.
2
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 12
PARTIES
6. Plaintiff Giuffre is an individual who is a citizen of the State of Colorado.
7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is
not a citizen of the state of Colorado.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. Virginia Giuffre became a victim of sex trafficking and repeated sexual abuse
after being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein when Giuffre was under the age
of eighteen.
9. Between 1999 and 2002, with the assistance and participation of Maxwell,
Epstein sexually abused Giuffre at numerous locations including his mansions in West Palm
Beach, Florida, and in this District. Between 2001 and 2007, with the assistance of numerous
co-conspirators, Epstein abused more than thirty (30) minor underage girls, a fact confirmed by
state and federal law enforcement.
10. As part of their sex trafficking efforts, Epstein and Maxwell intimidated Giuffre
into remaining silent about what had happened to her.
11. In September 2007, Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”)
that barred his prosecution for numerous federal sex crimes in the Southern District of Florida.
12. In the NPA, the United States additionally agreed that it would not institute any
federal criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.
13. As a co-conspirator of Epstein, Maxwell was consequently granted immunity in
the Southern District of Florida through the NPA.
14. Epstein ultimately pled guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution, and is now a
registered sex offender.
3
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 4 of 12
15. Rather than confer with the victims about the NPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office
and Epstein agreed to a “confidentiality” provision in the Agreement barring its disclosure to
anyone—including Epstein’s victims. As a consequence, the victims were not told about the
NPA.
16. On July 7, 2008, a young woman identified as Jane Doe No. 1, one of Jeffrey
Epstein’s victims (other than Giuffre), filed a petition to enforce her rights under the Crime
Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. ¶ 3771, alleging that the Government failed to
provide her the rights promised in the CVRA with regard to the plea arrangement with Epstein.
The litigation remains ongoing.
17. On or about May 4, 2009, Virginia Giuffre—identified then as Jane Doe No.
102—filed a complaint against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida. The complaint included allegations made by Giuffre that pertained
to Maxwell.
18. In pertinent part, the Jane Doe No. 102 complaint described in detail how
Maxwell recruited Giuffre (who was then a minor girl) to become a victim of sex trafficking by
introducing Giuffre to Jeffrey Epstein. With the assistance of Maxwell, Epstein was able to
sexually abuse Giuffre for years until Giuffre eventually escaped.
19. The Jane Doe No. 102 complaint contained the first public allegations made on
behalf of Giuffre regarding Maxwell.
20. As civil litigation against Epstein moved forward on behalf of Giuffre and many
other similarly-situated victims, Maxwell was served with a subpoena for deposition. Her
testimony was sought concerning her personal knowledge and role in Epstein’s abuse of Giuffre
and others.
4
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 5 of 12
21. To avoid her deposition, Maxwell claimed that her mother fell deathly ill and that
consequently she was leaving the United States for London with no plans of ever returning. In
fact, however, within weeks of using that excuse to avoid testifying, Maxwell had returned to
New York.
22. In 2011, two FBI agents located Giuffre in Australia—where she had been hiding
from Epstein and Maxwell for several years—and arranged to meet with her at the U.S.
Consulate in Sidney. Giuffre provided truthful and accurate information to the FBI about
Epstein and Maxwell’s sexual abuse.
23. Ultimately, as a mother and one of Epstein’s many victims, Giuffre believed that
she should speak out about her sexual abuse experiences in hopes of helping others who had also
suffered from sexual trafficking and abuse.
24. On December 23, 2014, Giuffre incorporated an organization called Victims
Refuse Silence, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation.
25. Giuffre intended Victims Refuse Silence to change and improve the fight against
sexual abuse and human trafficking. The goal of her organization was, and continues to be, to
help survivors surmount the shame, silence, and intimidation typically experienced by victims of
sexual abuse. Giuffre has now dedicated her professional life to helping victims of sex
trafficking.
26. On December 30, 2014, Giuffre moved to join the on-going litigation previously
filed by Jane Doe 1 in the Southern District of Florida challenging Epstein’s non-prosecution
agreement by filing her own joinder motion.
5
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 6 of 12
27. Giuffre’s motion described Maxwell’s role as one of the main women who
Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator and
participant in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme.
28. In January, 2015, Maxwell undertook a concerted and malicious campaign to
discredit Giuffre and to so damage her reputation that Giuffre’s factual reporting of what had
happened to her would not be credited.
29. As part of Maxwell’s campaign she directed her agent, Ross Gow, to attack
Giuffre’s honesty and truthfulness and to accuse Giuffre of lying.
30. On or about January 3, 2015, speaking through her authorized agent, Maxwell
issued an additional false statement to the media and public designed to maliciously discredit
Giuffre. That statement contained the following deliberate falsehoods:
(a)
(b)
(c)
That Giuffre’s sworn allegations “against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue.”
That the allegations have been “shown to be untrue.”
That Giuffre’s “claims are obvious lies.”
31. Maxwell’s January 3, 2015, statement incorporated by reference “Ghislaine
Maxwell’s original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same,” an earlier
statement that had falsely described Giuffre’s factual assertions as “entirely false” and “entirely
untrue.”
32. Maxwell made the same false and defamatory statements as set forth above, in the
Southern District of New York and elsewhere in a deliberate effort to maliciously discredit
Giuffre and silence her efforts to expose sex crimes committed around the world by Maxwell,
Epstein, and other powerful persons. Maxwell did so with the purpose and effect of having
6
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 7 of 12
others repeat such false and defamatory statements and thereby further damaged Giuffre’s
reputation.
33. Maxwell made her statements to discredit Giuffre in close consultation with
Epstein. Maxwell made her statements knowing full well they were false.
34. Maxwell made her statements maliciously as part of an effort to conceal sex
trafficking crimes committed around the world by Maxwell, Epstein and other powerful persons.
35. Maxwell intended her false and defamatory statements set out above to be
broadcast around the world and to intimidate and silence Giuffre from making further efforts to
expose sex crimes committed by Maxwell, Epstein, and other powerful persons.
36. Maxwell intended her false statements to be specific statements of fact, including
a statement that she had not recruited an underage Giuffre for Epstein’s abuse. Maxwell’s false
statements were broadcast around the world and were reasonably understood by those who heard
them to be specific factual claims by Maxwell that she had not helped Epstein recruit or sexually
abuse Giuffre and that Giuffre was a liar.
37. On or about January 4, 2015, Maxwell continued her campaign to falsely and
maliciously discredit Giuffre. When a reporter on a Manhattan street asked Maxwell about
Giuffre’s allegations against Maxwell, she responded by saying: “I am referring to the statement
that we made.” The New York Daily News published a video of this response by Maxwell
indicating that she made her false statements on East 65 th Street in Manhattan, New York, within
the Southern District of New York.
7
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 8 of 12
COUNT I
DEFAMATION
1. Plaintiff Giuffre re-alleges paragraphs 1 - 37 as if the same were fully set forth
herein. Maxwell made her false and defamatory statements deliberately and maliciously with the
intent to intimidate, discredit and defame Giuffre.
2. In January 2015, and thereafter, Maxwell intentionally and maliciously released to
the press her false statements about Giuffre in an attempt to destroy Giuffre’s reputation and
cause her to lose all credibility in her efforts to help victims of sex trafficking.
3. Maxwell additionally released to the press her false statements with knowledge
that her words would dilute, discredit and neutralize Giuffre’s public and private messages to
sexual abuse victims and ultimately prevent Giuffre from effectively providing assistance and
advocacy on behalf of other victims of sex trafficking, or to expose her abusers.
4. Using her role as a powerful figure with powerful friends, Maxwell’s statements
were published internationally for the malicious purpose of further damaging a sexual abuse and
sexual trafficking victim; to destroy Giuffre’s reputation and credibility; to cause the world to
disbelieve Giuffre; and to destroy Giuffre’s efforts to use her experience to help others suffering
as sex trafficking victims.
5. Maxwell, personally and through her authorized agent, Ross Gow, intentionally
and maliciously made false and damaging statements of fact concerning Giuffre, as detailed
above, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere.
6. The false statements made by Gow were all made by him as Maxwell’s
authorized agent and were made with direct and actual authority from Maxwell as the principal.
8
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 9 of 12
7. The false statements that Maxwell made personally, and through her authorized
agent Gow, not only called Giuffre’s truthfulness and integrity into question, but also exposed
Giuffre to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, and disgrace.
8. Maxwell made her false statements knowing full well that they were completely
false. Accordingly, she made her statements with actual and deliberate malice, the highest
degree of awareness of falsity.
9. Maxwell’s false statements constitute libel, as she knew that they were going to
be transmitted in writing, widely disseminated on the internet and in print. Maxwell intended her
false statements to be published by newspaper and other media outlets internationally, and they
were, in fact, published globally, including within the Southern District of New York.
10. Maxwell’s false statements constitute libel per se inasmuch as they exposed
Giuffre to public contempt, ridicule, aversion, and disgrace, and induced an evil opinion of her in
the minds of right-thinking persons.
11. Maxwell’s false statements also constitute libel per se inasmuch as they tended to
injure Giuffre in her professional capacity as the president of a non-profit corporation designed
to help victims of sex trafficking, and inasmuch as they destroyed her credibility and reputation
among members of the community that seeks her help and that she seeks to serve.
12. Maxwell’s false statements directly stated and also implied that in speaking out
against sex trafficking Giuffre acted with fraud, dishonesty, and unfitness for the task.
Maxwell’s false statements directly and indirectly indicate that Giuffre lied about being recruited
by Maxwell and sexually abused by Epstein and Maxwell. Maxwell’s false statements were
reasonably understood by many persons who read her statements as conveying that specific
intention and meaning.
9
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 10 of 12
13. Maxwell’s false statements were reasonably understood by many persons who
read those statements as making specific factual claims that Giuffre was lying about specific
facts.
14. Maxwell specifically directed her false statements at Giuffre’s true public
description of factual events, and many persons who read Maxwell’s statements reasonably
understood that those statements referred directly to Giuffre’s account of her life as a young
teenager with Maxwell and Epstein.
15. Maxwell intended her false statements to be widely published and disseminated
on television, through newspapers, by word of mouth and on the internet. As intended by
Maxwell, her statements were published and disseminated around the world.
16. Maxwell coordinated her false statements with other media efforts made by
Epstein and other powerful persons acting as Epstein’s representatives and surrogates. Maxwell
made and coordinated her statements in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere with
the specific intent to amplify the defamatory effect those statements would have on Giuffre’s
reputation and credibility.
17. Maxwell made her false statements both directly and through agents who, with
her general and specific authorization, adopted, distributed, and published the false statements on
Maxwell’s behalf. In addition, Maxwell and her authorized agents made false statements in
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and with malicious intent to destroy Giuffre’s
reputation and credibility; to prevent her from further disseminating her life story; and to cause
persons hearing or reading Giuffre’s descriptions of truthful facts to disbelieve her entirely.
Maxwell made her false statements wantonly and with the specific intent to maliciously damage
Giuffre’s good name and reputation in a way that would destroy her efforts to administer her
10
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 11 of 12
non-profit foundation, or share her life story, and thereby help others who have suffered from
sexual abuse.
18. As a result of Maxwell’s campaign to spread false, discrediting and defamatory
statements about Giuffre, Giuffre suffered substantial damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
19. Maxwell’s false statements have caused, and continue to cause, Giuffre economic
damage, psychological pain and suffering, mental anguish and emotional distress, and other
direct and consequential damages and losses.
20. Maxwell’s campaign to spread her false statements internationally was unusual
and particularly egregious conduct. Maxwell sexually abused Giuffre and helped Epstein to
sexually abuse Giuffre, and then, in order to avoid having these crimes discovered, Maxwell
wantonly and maliciously set out to falsely accuse, defame, and discredit Giuffre. In so doing,
Maxwell’s efforts constituted a public wrong by deterring, damaging, and setting back Giuffre’s
efforts to help victims of sex trafficking. Accordingly, this is a case in which exemplary and
punitive damages are appropriate.
21. Punitive and exemplary damages are necessary in this case to deter Maxwell and
others from wantonly and maliciously using a campaign of lies to discredit Giuffre and other
victims of sex trafficking.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Giuffre respectfully requests judgment against Defendant
Maxwell, awarding compensatory, consequential, exemplary, and punitive damages in an
amount to be determined at trial, but in excess of the $75,000 jurisdictional requirement; costs of
suit; attorneys’ fees; and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
11
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 12 of 12
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all causes of action asserted within this
pleading.
Dated September 21, 2015.
/s/ David Boies
David Boies
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
/s/ Sigrid McCawley
Sigrid McCawley
(Pro Hac Vice Pending)
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954) 356-0011
/s/ Ellen Brockman
Ellen Brockman
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
575 Lexington Ave
New York, New York 10022
(212) 446-2300
12
EXHIBIT H
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN
AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G.
CASSELL,
vs.
Plaintiff(s),
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ,
Defendant(s).
NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
Plaintiffs, Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell, by and through their undersigned
counsel, hereby file this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories with the Court propounded
by the Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, on February 11, 2015, and that a copy has been
furnished to the attorney for the Defendant.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve
to all Counsel on the attached list, this day of , 2015.
A CA OLA
Florida Bar No.: 169440
Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and
mep@searcylaw.com
Primary E-Mail: _scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13. Describe in detail Each instance in which Jane Doe #3 has provided information
referencing Dershowitz by name that Concern the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31
of the 2015 Jane Doe #3 Declaration.
ANSWER: Edwards and Cassell lack sufficient information to determine all circumstances in
which Jane Doe No. 3 has mentioned to others Dershowitz's name as someone who abused her
or had information relevant to abuse.
With regard to when she has provided information related to this subject to them, Jane Doe No. 3
provided such information in telephone calls with Brad Edwards beginning in 2011.
Jane Doe No. 3 has also provided this information in a public affidavit, filed on January 21,
2015, in the CVRA case. Jane Doe No. 3 has also provided similar information on other
occasions, but the specifics of those communications are protected by the attorney-client
privilege and the work product doctrine.
14. If You have ever seen a photograph or video of Jane Doe #3 with Dershowitz, then state
when You saw the photograph or video, identify who took the original photograph
or video, identify Each person who possesses a copy of the photograph or video, and state
the location of Each such original and copy.
ANSWER: Edwards and Cassell have not personally seen such a photograph or
video. Discovery efforts to obtain photographic materials regarding Jane Doe No. 3 held by the
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and/or other federal law enforcement
and prosecuting agencies are on-going.
15. For Each communication between You or anyone acting on Your behalf, and anyone
from, or acting on behalf of, any media outlet Concerning this action, the Joinder Motion,
or Dershowitz, and regardless of whether such communication was ""on the record"" or ""off
the record,"" (a) state the date of the communication; (b) state the participants in the
communication; and (c) describe the contents of the communication.
ANSWER: Objection, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;
vague, harassing, work-product.
16. Describe in detail All facts Concerning any assertion that Dershowitz was
a ""coconspirator"" with Epstein.
ANSWER: See answers to interrogatory number 5 above, as well as answers to interrogatories
numbers 1, 6, 8, 9, 10 above. In addition, factual information is found in the documents and
other materials and references provided in answer to Request for Production Number 2
15
PAUL G. CASSELL
STATE OF )
COUNTY OF (A-cr )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of
or who has produced
, 20 ,•5 by
who is personally known to me
(type of identification) as
identification and whClidtdid not take an oath.
„ LtS crki -)C( CQ1 „
Notary Public
Statc of
My Commission expires:
Commission No:
vsc L'kkq.it,
SaNitcrAr4 BP Au bCi jAc
P4r) itlifte il19ys c 7 hIsr
State
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF 3r-await d )
Bradley J. Edwards
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared this day Bradley J.
Edwards, who [ is
personally known to me or [ produced
, as identification, and who, after being duly sworn, did state
that he/she executed the foregoing Answers to First Set of Interrogatories and that the same are
true and correct to the best of his knowledge
Subscribed and sworn to before me this IS'day of , 2015.
W1R1A W. KELLJCHINI
MY COMMISSION iPEE840478
EXPIRES: OCT 03, 2016
Son* We* 1M SOW imam
Signature ofNotaryPublik, St .cSfFlorida
Print / Typed Name, Notary Public
My commission expires:
10
EXHIBIT I
·1· · · · · ·IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH
· · · · · · · · · ·JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
·2· · · · · · · · · · BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
·3· · · · · · · · · CASE NO.· CACE 15-000072
·4
·5· ·BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL,
·6
· · · · · · · · ·Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,
·7
· · · · · · · · ·vs.
·8
·9· ·ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ,
10
· · · · · · · · ·Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.
11· ·_______________________________________________/
12
13
14· · · · · · · · · ·VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
15· · · · · · · · · · · ·PAUL G. CASSELL
16· · · · · · · TAKEN ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT
17· · · · · · · · · ·VOLUME I, PAGES 1 to 151
18
19
20· · · · · · · · · ·Friday, October 16, 2015
21· · · · · · · · · · 1:33 p.m. - 4:31 p.m.
22
· · · · · · · · · · ·110 Southeast 6th Street
23· · · · · · · · · · 110 Tower - Suite 1850
· · · · · · · · ·Fort Lauderdale, Florida· 33301
24
25· · · · · · · · · ·Theresa Tomaselli, RMR
·1· ·let me clear all of that misunderstanding up.
·2· ·You know, that's -- frankly, if I had gotten
·3· ·something like that, that's what I would have
·4· ·said.
·5· · · ·The answer that came back was -- from
·6· ·Mr. Dershowitz was something along the lines of,
·7· ·if I remember correctly, well, tell me what
·8· ·you -- you -- tell me what you want to know and
·9· ·I'll decide whether to cooperate, was I think
10· ·the phrase that was used.· And -- and so there
11· ·was an attempt, you know, a 2009 attempt, a 2011
12· ·attempt to get information from Mr. Dershowitz.
13· · · ·Then there was another subpoena without
14· ·deposition for -- for documents.· You know, we
15· ·have heard a lot about records in this case that
16· ·could prove innocence.· There was a records
17· ·request to Mr. Dershowitz in 2013.· And, again,
18· ·my understanding was that there was no -- you
19· ·know, no documents were provided on that.
20· · · ·And so those -- I had that information.
21· ·Another bit of information that I had was that in
22· ·2011, I believe in early April -- this is not
23· ·attorney/client privileged information from
24· ·Virginia Roberts.· This is a telephone call that
25· ·she placed from Australia where she had been
EXHIBIT J
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
JEFFREY EPSTEiN,
CASE NO.: 5O2009CAO4O800XXXXMBAG
vs.
Plaintiff,
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
and EM., individually,
Defendants.
_______________________________________________________________________/
NOTICE OF FILING
COMES NOW the Defendant/CounterClaimant, BRADLEY EDWARDS, by and
through his undersigned counsel, and hereby files the attached transcript of the telephone
interview of Virginia Roberts to supplement the proffer made in support of Counter-Claimant’s
Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Punitive Damages.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by
U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this ______ day of May 2011.
Jack Scarola
Florida Bar No.: 169440
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451
Attorney for Defendant/CounterClaimant
Edwards
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No.: 5O2009CAO4O800XXXXJvIBAG
Notice of Filing Supplement
COUNSEL LIST
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
jgoldberger@agwpa.com;
smahoney@agwpa.com
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-659-8300
Fax: (561)-835-8691
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Martin Weinberg, Esquire
Martin Weinberg, P.C.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Suffolk, MA 02116
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos &
Lehrman, PL
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954)-524-2820
Fax: (954)-524-2822
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire
jla~fowler-white.com
Fowler White Burnett, P.A.
901 Phillips Point West
777 5 Flagler Drive
West Palm Beach, FL 3340 1-6170
Phone: (56 1)-802-9044
Fax: (561)-802-9976
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Marc S. Nurik
marc@nuriklaw.com
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954)-745-5849
Fax: (954)-745-3556
Attorneys for Scott Rothstein
2
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No.: SO2009CAO4O800XXXXMBAG
Notice of Filing Supplement
3

TELECON
PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO FS 766.205(4) and/or WORK PRODUCT
PARTICIPANTS:
RE:
JACK SCAROLA
BRAD EDWARDS
VIRGINIA ROBERTS
Edwards adv. Epstein
291874
DATE: April 07, 2011
JS:
BE:
Virginia, Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards
Hi Virginia.
V: Hi Jack! Hi Brad! How you guys doing?
JS: We’re doing fine, thank you. I’m sorry for all of the trouble and before we go any
further, let me tell you, if I have your permission, I have started a tape recorder and I
want to be able to tape this conversation from the very beginning. Is that alright with
you?
V: Sure, that’s fine, Jack. No problem
JS: Ok, good, thank you. I appreciate that. Let me start off by introducing myself. I know
that Brad has spoken to you about me but I am Brad’s lawyer, and I assume that you can
confirm that you and I have never had any communication before. Is that right?
V: That’s correct.
JS: Alright. I have, however, gotten some information from Brad about conversations that
you have had with him, and that will enable me, hopefully, to make this a little bit more
efficient and take up a minimum amount of your time while still getting the information
that we think is going to be helpful to us and to any jury that might ultimately have to
hear these facts.
So, let me begin by asking you first to tell us what your full name is.
V: Virginia Louise Roberts. That’s my maiden name. My married name is Virginia Louise
*

Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 2 of 23
JS:
Could you spell your last name for us? That is your married last name:
V:
JS:
Airight, thank you, and where are you living right now?
V: I live in Australia.
JS:
And how long have you resided in Australia.
V: Thisismyl9thyear.
JS:
That is where you are right now, correct? We’ve reached you in Australia for this phone
conversation?
V: That is correct, yes.
JS:
And what time is it in Australia right now?
V: I think it’s about 9:00 now.
JS: Ok. That’s 9am, correct?
V: That’s correct.
JS: Airight. Virginia, the reason for this conversation is because it is our understanding that
you know a man by the name Jeffrey Epstein, and I want to begin by asking you please to
tell us about the circumstances of your first meeting Mr. Epstein.
V: Ok. I was introduced to Mr. Epstein by Ghislaine Maxwell. I was working at Donald
Trump’s spa in Mar-a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey’s
mansion in Palm Beach that afternoon after work to make some extra money and to learn
about massage. She met me at the spa, and I was reading a book about anatomy, so I was
already interested in massage therapy as it was and not having any of the education or
you know anything behind me, I thought this was a great opportunity to work for her and
go. So, I went to Jeffrey’s mansion about 5 or 6 in the afternoon. My dad drove me
there. My dad worked at Mar-a-Lago with me, and he met Ghislaine and she seemed like
a nice, proper English lady, and she knows, I mean, you know, one time then _once
before I left to travel overseas, she just seemed really nice and like she would like to help
me out. So my dad left, and I had no problem getting home that night, one of her drivers
would take me back after my trial. So she led me upstairs, and into Jeffrey’s bedroom,
and past that is Jeffrey’s massage room, which has got his steam room and a shower and
a massage table, and there is actually an extra room that has, that nobody knows about it,
it’s kinda like a secret room and it’s got a whole bunch of decorative pictures of
pornographic literature and sex toys and I can ? what happened in there.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 3 of 23
JS:
When you say that the room was hidden, Virginia, how was the room concealed?
V: It wasn’t like a door that you would normally go into, like some kind of special opening,
you open that and then a little door, so it looks like it’s a little closet so-to-speak, but
when you walk in there, it’s obviously a lot bigger than just a closet. It wasn’t too big,
but it was bigger, you know. It wasn’t a gigantic room, it was just like a small room,
which you know, it probably could fit some shoes in there, it had racks of shoes, boxes,
some sweatshirts neatly folded, and the ceiling to the floor was covered in pornographic
pictures of the girls that he had met.
JS:
Whenyou say...
V: So anyways, that was getting there, and I was introduced to Jeffrey, he was laying naked
on top of the massage table, and obviously for one, I’m a 15 year old girl and seeing him
on the table was weird but, also learning about anatomy and massage, I thought this
would be part of it. So obviously, I thought it was part of the massage program, so I said
ok, this is fme. And, he then instructed me on how to touch the body, Jeffrey’s body,
how to massage him, and for the first hour, it was actually a real massage, maybe not an
hour, maybe like 40 minutes or something, but of something like that _and that’s when he
turned over on the other side and to expose himself fully. So then Ghislaine told me that
she wanted me to undress and began to take off my shirt and skirt, my white uniform
from Mar-A-Lago, she also took off her shirt and got undressed, and so I was there with
just my undies on, and she was completely bare, and made some kind of little flake about
the underwear that I was wearing because it wasn’t my normal sexy girl underwear and
just like, I don’t know, had red hearts on it or something like that; just your normal, you
know, real cute underwear. Anyways, so during all of this I’m kind of like what’s going
on, how do I act, what do I say, I was so afraid of, not afraid or fearful for my life but
_unsure of how all this started and wanting to obtain a profession_ I was so afraid
thinking about upsetting and disappointing them, I don’t know, it’s a weird situation by
far and I was expected to _Lick his nipples, instructed on how to do so by J.E_ and give
him oral sex while he wanted to fondle me, and then at the end, I was told by Ghislaine to
get on top and straddle Jeffrey sexually, and when we were done, we went and had a
shower in the room and Jeffrey told me to wash him up and down, you know with a bar
of soap and make sure he was all cleaned up. And then he took me downstairs and took
me to two of the guards and told John to bring me home. John was the butler at the time.
JS: Let me interrupt you for just a moment there if I could, Virginia. You mentioned as you
were recounting those details that you were 15 years old at the time. What is your date of
birth?
V: August9th, 1983
JS:
And can you tell us please, as best you’re able to estimate it, what the date was when this
first encounter occurred?
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 4 of23
V: I’ve got it written down. It’s like - I’m not good with math — hold on — I thought I wrote
it down but I didn’t. I’m not too sure, I think it was 1998 off the top of my head and
around June of 1998, I would say as I was turning 16 at the end of the summer.
JS: Alright. You talked about the room where Jeffrey had the pornographic photographs.
Did you actually see that room on the occasion ofyour first visit there?
V: No, I got to see that room a few visits after but I was just trying to describe that room to
you guys so you knew exactly what room I was talking about.
JS: Another question for you, and I don’t mean to be prying into your personal life, and if I
ask you any questions at all that you’re uncomfortable answering, then you just tell me
that and we’ll move on, because I appreciate your cooperation and the last I thing I want
to do is impose upon that cooperation, but can you tell us please just generally what kind
of sexual experience you had had prior to this confrontation with Jeffrey?
V: Yeah, sure. A close family friend has sexually abused me, and I was on the streets at 13
years old. I was picked up by a 67 year old man named Ron _Eppinger_ who did exactly
what Jeffrey did with me abuse and violate my youthfulness — & I was with him for 6
months. So, he was gone and then I had this boyfriend who was like my school friend
from young days but we just kept in contact with each other and we were on and off
constantly, and that was Tony Figeroua_, and there was also another younger guy was
near my age, Michael, I can’t remember his last name, but yeah, there, I mean, there
wasn’t like a string of men or anything, but there was Ron, like I told you, and he was the
first guy expecting me to do so-called disgusting affairs. Jeffrey actually knew Ron,
which was quite weird when I told Jeffrey the story about Ron, and Jeffrey had actually
met him, and yeah. Anyway, just another story, and yeah, there were a couple of men,
but that gives you an idea.
JS: Now when you described the photographs in the room as pornographic, tell me just a
little bit about the photographs, if you would please? First, how many of them were
there?
V: At least 100, and like I said, they covered the room from the ceiling, not the ceiling but
from the top of the edge of the wall to the bottom of the floor. I want to say at least a
hundred, even more, there could have been more in the boxes _Some of them were A4_
photographs, like the large size, some of naked women posing, you know, positions, sexy
positions. Others were, you know, some girls had bikinis on, and it wasn’t so
pornographic, but it was all women, and it was all in a sexual nature.
JS:
Were there photographs where more than one person appeared?
V: Oh yeah, plenty of them. There were lots of naked photographs, I mean I was just trying
to give you a visual range. There was anything from 5x6s to 4x8s to 8x4s. Some of them
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 5 of 23
had frames, some of them were out of frames, but they were all, like I said, they were all
women, they were all sexual in nature.
JS:
Was it your impression that there were a hundred photos of a hundred different people or
were there multiple photos of the same woman or girl?
V: There was definitely a lot of different girls. I mean it wasn’t easy to sit there and say,
you weren’t finding 5 girls out of some photos, no. Were there a hundred different ones?
There could have been pictures of some girls, I really couldn’t get close necessarily to
actually recognize faces or anything like that. But if you, you know, the range of them
were all different, majority of them were different, yeah.
JS:
Did there ever come a point in time when you became aware that a photograph of you
had been added to the collection?
V: Yes, there was. Ghislaine took several nude photographs of me for Jeffrey. So, yeah,
there were pictures of me and there were pictures, he wasn’t shy, that wasn’t the only
place in his house that he kept the photos. He liked photos all over his house. If you
looked in his den or on his desk or in on the hail table, a giant hall table in his house,
there were at least a hundred photos of girls in frames. Not all of them were naked, a lot
of the ones that were all around his house were not naked girls posing pornographically,
some were pictures of celebrities and politicians he had known_or things like that or had
pants on or whatever, but yeah, there was a lot of mixed photographs in the outside ones.
JS: Were there any photographs of girls or young women that you knew or that you
subsequently came to know that you saw in the house?
V: Yeah, yeah, there was. There was pictures of Nadia Bjournik , pictures
Sarah Keller, pictures Emmy, pictures of me, pictures of the regulars, but a lot of the
girls, sometimes Jeffrey could have like 7 girls a day, and he would only see those girls
once if he got bored. I don’t know. These weren’t my days. I heard he’s gotten a lot
sloppier since I left. So, I don’t know anyways, but when I knew him, there was just a, it
seemed, there was such an influx of girls coming in and out, so did I recognize a lot of
them? Maybe, maybe not, but then they were all definitely beautiful, they were all
ranging in age, some of them young, some of them older in their 20’s, I mean it was just
they were all beautiful.
JS: You’ve told us about the first visit. Was there any discussion on the occasion ofthat first
visit about your returning?
V: Yes, they were very pleased with me and after the encounter was fmished, the sexual
encounter, he went and told me I did well and I have a lot of potential to become a
massage therapist and if I’d like I could return tomorrow, you know, and do the same
thing and get paid $200/hi, so Jeffrey insisted that I come after work, and over the next
few days, I guess the relationship grew into more, and within a couple of weeks, not even
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 6 of 23
a couple of weeks, maybe a week, I had quit Mar-a-Lago and I was working for Jeffrey
full time.
JS: Ok, let’s talk about your job .at Mar-a-Lago, if we could. You said that your Dad was
working there. What was his position at Mar-a-Lago?
V: He was a maintenance supervisor I think is what it was called? He like managed the
tennis courts and air conditioners and things like that.
JS:
What is your Dad’s full name?
V: Sky William Roberts.
JS:
And is he still living here in South Florida now?
V: No, he’s not, he’s in California.
JS: Ok. Is your Dad aware of what is currently going on with regard to your having made
public statements about your relationship with Jeffrey?
V: Yes, he is well aware of it. I told my family even before all this stuff came out, because
they were the first ones contacted by the journalists from Mail on Sunday. I know that
they the Mail on Sunday printed that I had gone out and tried to, I mean I think one of the
photos said that I was angry that I saw Jeffrey and the Prince walking together and that is
why I came out and went public with everything. Not true. I mean, I am angry about
how they are still up to their old ways together and that they’re still hanging out but I
didn’t contact the Mail on Sunday and I didn’t bring it out. I figured that everyone was
going to bring it out anyway and I better bring it out the right way. He’s known
everything from the start, and my family is very supportive with everything going on.
JS: I’m kind of going to jump around a little bit and I apologize for that, but since the subject
has come up, tell me first of all why you are providing this cooperation to us, and I am
certainly very appreciative of it, but I want you to tell us why it is you’ve chosen to spend
time with us on the telephone and provide this information that you’re now providing.
V: I’m out to help the bigger picture, you know, I think all of us can make a big difference in
a lot of other people’s lives and I think that this has gone on long enough and it’s a big
slap in my face that he can get away with hurting me so bad let alone so many other girls
and laugh about it. I guess I talked to you guys out because I want to see the right thing
happen, not just to him, but I want people in the world to understand this is not the way
of life, you know, it’s not acceptable to go out procure young girls and make them think
that, this is the way you should be living and that’s all. Yeah, I guess my reason for
doing it is to help the bigger picture, you know, I’m a big believer in karma and I believe
that good things will come back to you, so I guess that’s why I’m doing this.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 7 of 23
JS:
Just for the record, neither Brad, nor I, nor anyone representing that they have anything to
do with us has made any promises to you. Is that correct?
V: That is correct. I’ll tell you, since this is our first conversation, that nobody has made me
feel like I’ve been bribed or bought or had to say anything. I’ve told you anything that I
know from my own self, not some things somebody told me. If anything, Brad’s been
extra careful not to tell me anything and let me do all the talking, so it’s quite opposite I
think.
JS: Airight. Let’s get back then to the story of your relationship with Jeffrey, and we’ve
talked about your first encounter with him and how it evolved from that into your full
time employment with Jeffrey, but what were you doing at Mar-a-Lago before you quit
Mar-a-Lago?
V: I was just a locker room attendant and sometimes I did babysitting for the rich and
famous. So, I wasn’t anything big. I worked in the spa area. That’s why I was studying
anatomy, because I was really really interested in becoming a _massage therapist, and at
the locker room, I didn’t do much. I mean I was making tea for a living, I would, you
know, make sure the toilet paper had a little triangle in it after everybody went to the
toilet, or wipe down the water from the basin, you know, it was a very easy peasy job.
JS:
Did you get that job through your Dad?
V: Yes, my Dad got me the job.
JS:
Ok, and you were only 15 years old at the time, were they aware of how old you were at
Mar-a-Lago?
V: Of course, definitely. We had to go through extensive, you know, we even had to get
drug tested and id test and so on and so forth. I mean, Mantas (?) is very strict on
employment, yeah, everybody knew.
JS: Ok. Was there ever any conversation with Ghislaine about how old you were before you
were taken to Jeffrey’s mansion?
V: No. She didn’t ask me how old I was from the start, but when I did get to Jeffrey’s
mansion, it was discussed how old I was.
JS:
With whom?
V: During the entire hour of what I call the legitimate massage I was giving him, it was cat
and mouse games getting information from me to find out who I am, am I a willing
participant in these kind of things, and how would I react if they were about to take the
next step. But they got information off of me, they got my age, they got my, a little bit of
my history so they knew I was, you know, not very stable at home, and they knew that,
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 8 of23
you know, I was actually interested in making my life better by studying so what they
were offering me was a chance to become a legitimate masseuse but it was getting
trained. They would have people show me how to work the body and be called a
massage therapist and get me books on it, and you know, keep me interested, and every
time, you know, I was with Jeffrey, literally was about massages, I don’t mean just going
in and have sex with him. I mean massage, because it would always start out with
massage and then it would lead into sometimes other things.
JS: Airight, once this evolved, into full time employment, what did full time employment
mean?
V: That was entirely having to travel with Jeffrey in every city. When he was in Palm
Beach, I stayed at my apartment, and he would call me to his house once or twice a day
sometimes, and that’s, you know, do things with him. Sometimes we’d go out shopping,
sometimes we’d go out and watch a movie. You know, simple things like that, go to an
expo or a fair, whatever it was. But when we were in other cities, I was at my
apartment, I lived with him full time. What I mean by full time is even in the middle of
the night, I could get a ring on my phone next to me and tell me to come in his room, you
know, so it was literally full time.
JS:
When you say that when you were in Palm Beach you were living in your apartment,
were you living on your own or were you living with members of your family at that
time?
V: No, after I quit Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey offered to get me an apartment in Palm Beach
somewhere, Royal Palm Beach, and it was a nice apartment. He furnished it for me, it
was absolutely beautiful, but yeah, that’s the only time I would spend time away from
him really.
JS:
This apartment was on Royal Palm Beach Boulevard or out in the Village of Royal Palm
Beach?
V: I so honestly don’t remember. I’ve been trying to rack my brain because the FBI was
asking the same thing and were trying to fmd it, but yeah, I’m Not sur_. I didn’t get to
spend as much time in it, I was only there about an entire week out of every month
probably, but the majority of the time I was with Jeffrey anyways. It was somewhere in
Royal Palm Beach. I don’t know about Royal Palm Beach drive. I don’t even remember
the Royal Palm Beach drive anymore so I’m not too sure.
JS: Ok, let me see if I can draw the distinction for you and maybe that will help you to help
us? Royal Palm Beach is a village that is...
V: No, no, no, I got Royal Palm Beach, I just didn’t know the Royal Palm Beach Drive, like
what street it’s off of. Were you talking about a street?
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 9 of 23
JS: Yes, I was talking about a street. Royal Palm Drive is on the island of Palm Beach, and
it’s a street that is lined with large royal palm trees, and I’m wondering if this was an
apartment on the island or was this an apartment out west oftown...
V: No, it was actually in Royal Palm Beach, not on the island.
JS:
Airight.
V: I would be driven, it was closer to my family than it was closer to him. I wanted to be
close enough to everybody else so that when I was in town, I could just go see them
quickly.
JS:
Ok. So we’re not talking about Royal Palm Boulevard. We’re talking about the town of
Royal Palm west of town. Jeffrey got you an apartment out there.
V: That’s correct.
JS:
When he was in Palm Beach, you were generally not staying at the mansion, you were
staying at the apartment that he got for you out west of town.
V: That’s correct.
JS:
Ok.
V: I mean then there was times, I don’t wanna say that every time I stayed at my apartment.
There was times we’d fly back from some city maybe too late at night to really want to
go back home, so you know, it’s like 12:00 at night or 1:00 in the morning. I was just
staying in the yellow room, or something like that; one of the guest rooms in Palm Beach.
But majority of the time, I would definitely want to get back to my own apartment.
JS: Alight. What were the general hours of your full time employment when ...?
V: There was not set hours. It wasn’t like logging, and you know, hitting the shift button,
nothing like that. The way I would get paid would be, ok, if I was in Palm Beach, I
would get $200 an hour to massage Jeffrey or some of his friends and then go home. So
it would be like that. If I was traveling with him, it would be per massage, so I would be
getting paid per day. So I wouldn’t be getting paid on an hourly rate. He wouldn’t say
ok, today you’re going to work for me from 7:00 in the morning until 8:00 at night. It
never like that. I was on call all the time.
JS:
When you were here in Palm Beach, were you actually getting paid only for the time
spent massaging Jeffrey or were you getting paid from your arrival at his house until you
left the house?
V: From the time the massage started.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 10 of 23
JS: From the time the massage started. Ok.
V: Sometimes we’d go there and I would wait for a while or talk with G’hislaine and Jeffrey
about something or we’d meet somewhere and talk about something. A lot of times, I’d
meet him upstairs in his room where he was ready for me. But then there was a lot of
times where it didn’t start right away, so he couldn’t really pay me from the time I got
there sometimes unless it was just paid from the time I massaged him til the time the
massage was over.
JS: Airight. Did your duties for Jeffrey ever include anything other than providing him
massages and sex in connection with the massages? Did he ever give you any other
responsibilities to perform?
V: I was asked to do the same things that I did to Jeffrey to a few of his fellow colleagues as
well. Those were my duties. He looked at it this way is that I was going to be a
professional massage therapist, and maybe I needed some clientele, so he had me perform
erotic massages on a few people.
JS:
Did that start here in Palm Beach County?
V: It did. The first one did.
JS: Ok, and how long after you first met Jeffrey did he first ask you to provide services for
one ofhis friends?
V: About 9 months, I think it was. It wasn’t a full year, it wasn’t 6 months, but between 6
months and a year, which is why I’m saying 9 months.
JS:
And when you provided services to a friend of Jeffrey’s, who paid you for those services?
V: Jeffrey would. I would get paid the next time I saw Jeffrey, so if I was invited to the
Breakers Hotel to give a massage, I would give a massage, I would go home, and the next
day when I saw Jeffrey, he would pay me for what I did. So, it was paid always by him,
it was set up by him, so he always knew what to pay me. I did get tips and things like
that, if you call it that, you know, like a hundred dollar tip or something from a few of
them, you know, yeah.
JS:
Was there..
V: There was always payment from Jeffrey.
JS:
Was there ever any discussion with Jeffrey about what was expected to happen when you
provided massage services to one ofJeffrey’s friends?
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 11 of23
V: In a roundabout way, yes. In so many ways, Jeffrey really really had to train me, and that
was why Ghislaine said that she and Jeffrey enjoyed me so much was because they never
really had to speak much to me to tell me what they wanted me to do. You know, I
wasn’t waiting for you know, their directions. Jeffrey would tell me to go give an erotic
massage to friends. He wouldn’t give me much detail about it, but he would say to treat
them like you treat me.
JS:
Did he refer to it as an erotic massage or are those your words?
V: Erotic massage is my words. That’s exactly what it was, but he would tell me to treat
them how he wanted it, so I’d do what he wanted without having to say to me words
more. I mean, I complied with what he wanted because it was somewhat of a, I don’t
know, I don’t know how to say it, it was just very mindboggling how I let him have so
much control or power over me basically. The massages would be routine to what Jeffrey
wanted with my so called new clientele, and with their own words would ask me to
provide them with sexual pleasure after the massage.
JS:
Did you ever report back to Jeffrey about what happened when you provided massages to
his friends?
V: Of course, of course, and I knew that his friends were reporting back to him as well
because there were times where he would instigate conversation by saying you know, so
and so had a great time, you did wonderful, you know so and so gave me a call and told
J.E how it went...
JS:
Did Jeffrey ever elicit details from you? “Tell me what happened, describe in detail what
went on?”
V: No, but he would have a laugh, he had a laugh with me a few times about some of their
different mannerisms, I guess you would say, like some of them, one guy had a foot
fetish and that was really weird and I mentioned it to Jeffrey, and we would have a laugh
over it. He didn’t want to know details. He wasn’t asking me “so tell me what did you
guys do exactly.” No, he just basically gave me a slap on the back and said, you know,
good job. And we had some kind of conversation about it. I can’t recall any conversation
off the top of my head. I really don’t know one. It’s been that long. But yeah, we did
talk about it briefly.
JS:
Can you give me an estimate as to the number of friends for whom Jeffrey provided and
paid for your services?
V: There was about, you know, I don’t know, 8 guys possibly.
JS:
And are you able to name those people for me?
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 12 of 23
V: No, not at this stage. I just, some of these people are really influential in power, and I
don’t want to start another shitstonn with a few of them. I’ll tell you that there was some
erotic massages given to, I’m just afraid to say it to you.
JS:
Ok, Virginia.
V: It’s like geez, I don’t know if I want to, I’m really scared of where this is gonna go.
JS: Alight. I understand that, and as I told you from the beginning, if I ask you a question
that you are uncomfortable answering, you just tell me that, and I will move on, and I
understand that at least right now, you are uncomfortable answering, and I am certainly
going to respect that.
V: Thank you so much, Jack.
JS: No, that’s quite alight. I am very appreciate of the cooperation you are providing, and I
don’t want you at any time to feel that we are taking unfair advantage of that cooperation,
so give me the information that you’re comfortable giving me, and if we get to a point
where you’re uncomfortable, I will respect that and we’ll move on from there.
V: Ok.
iS: I want to talk a little bit about the traveling that you did with Jeffi~ey. About how long
into your relationship with him did that first start?
V: Immediately. I started traveling immediately. Not internationally until I think about,
Gosh, I can’t remember even, I think it was a year later that we started doing international
travel. Maybe like 9 months to a year again. Not too sure to be honest.
JS: So that would have been approximately the summer of 1999? Somewhere around there?
V: Yes. Somewhere around there. Somewhere around a year, somewhere around there, I
can’t pinpoint it exactly. But like I said, we started doing domestic traveling
immediately, so my first destination with him was New York and Santa Fe and the
Carribean, California, I would take trips with him occasionally. Sometimes we would go
to St. Louis or New Orleans or Santa Cruz. We were traveling just about everywhere I
think.
JS:
How did you travel?
V: Well, we took Jeffrey’s private jet, and unless I was being sent somewhere by myself for
what we were just talking about before, then I would travel on a what do you call, a
public jet, whatever it is...
iS:
commercial flight?
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 13 of23
V: Yes. Just a normal flight, an e-ticket.
iS:
Like the rest of us common folk.
V: But when I was traveling with Jeffrey, the majority of the time would be on the black jet.
iS:
Now, when you say there would be times when you would travel by yourself because he
was sending you somewhere, tell me about that. How did that come about?
V: So, one of his colleagues would be at the Carribean or Santa Fe or even New York, or
wherever, and he would call me up on those days where I am not working with him or in
Palm Beach with him, and he would ask me to get on the next plane to so and so and go
meet so and so, and that’s when I would take e-tickets. His secretary or special assistant,
whatever, would organize it for me and give me the details and I would just walk up the
line and they’d let me right through.
JS: Can you give me any ideas as to how many times it happened that Jeffrey would send
you off to meet some friend of his at some location outside of Palm Beach?
V: How many times it happened? I’m not too sure. Probably about 10-15 times.
JS: Ok. And on those occasions, how much time would you spend with one of Jeffrey’s
friends when you were sent to a location that you would have to travel to?
V: Only a couple of days. Only 2 days, that’s it.
iS:
And how were you paid for those trips?
V: I would be paid in cash upon my arrival back with Jeffrey. So, whenever I was back with
Jeffrey, he would count up how many days I’ve had, sometimes give me even more than
what I deserved, not deserved, but what I earned and give me a little extra.
iS:
Was there a daily rate for those trips or was that per massage also?
V: Per massage. With Jeffrey, I would be honest. I wouldn’t tell him I did 15 massages if I
didn’t. He knew he could trust me. He could always come back to the other person that
he sent me to give massages and ask them as well, so you know, it was always by per
massage.
iS: Alight. When we’ve been talking about massages, tell me exactly what it is we’re
talking about when we speak about massages.
V: Same thing I would do to Jeffrey. Again, it would start out as a massage, which would
start with them being naked, and me giving him a legitimate massage to begin with, so
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 14 of23
I’d start with his feet, go up to his calves, up his legs, buttocks, back, his neck, his head,
his arms, yada yada, and then it would be time to flip over, and some of the men would
want me to continue on massaging the front side of them and they would instigate me to
begin having sex with them or foreplay, whatever you want to call it.
iS: So routinely, these massages involved sexual activity. Is that accurate?
V: That is accurate.
iS: Ok. Let’s talk about the travel that you were involved in when you were on Jeffrey’s
private plane. Generally speaking, who were the passengers on the plane when you
traveled.
V: Well, Larry was the pilot, and then there was a short, small solid guy, I don’t know his
name, but he was a co-pilot, and then he changed and there was another guy brought in
later on. Generally speaking, there was always Jeffrey, sometimes Ghislaine, sometimes
Emmy, sometimes a whole bunch of other girls, sometimes famous people, sometimes
some politicians or yeah, just about anybody could fly on his plane. There was never no
any set routine who would come and who would go. It was an influx of people on
Jeffrey’s airplane.
is: I want to deal with these things separately in order to respect some of the reservations
that you have, so I’m going to ask you who the people were that you remember flying
with Jeffrey on his plane when you were personally present without regard to whether
there was any sexual activity that occurred on the plane or not. So I’m not asking you to
implicate any of these famous people in improper conduct, but just tell me what the
names of the people are that you remember that you consider to be famous people.
V: Ok, there was Naomi Campbell, Heidi Kium, there was Bill Clinton. There was Al (?)
Gore, there was a whole bunch of models, I wouldn’t really honestly be able to give their
names. There was Matt Groning the producer of the simpons cartoon, Jack CCousteau’s
granddaughter a lot of interior designers, architects, politicians. I am just trying to think
of as many names as possible for you. Off the top of my head, that’s as good as I can get
for now.
iS: Ok, alright, that’s fine. And again, I am not implying by my questions, nor do I want
your answers to be interpreted as your suggesting that any of those people that you have
just identified were engaged in any improper activities on any particular flight, but I want
to talk to you now about what went on on occasion on the airplane. Ok?
V: Ok. It was a lot of the same thing that went down on the ground. A lot oftimes, it would
be just be me and ieffrey, or me and Jeffrey and Ghislaine, or me and Jeffrey and some
other girl, sometimes Emmy, Sarah, and Nadia Bjournik. There would be sexual conduct,
there would be foreplay, there was a bed in there, so we could basically reenact exactly
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 15 of23
what was happening in the house. It would start off with massaging or we would start off
with foreplay, sometimes it would lead to, you know, orgies.
iS:
Were there occasions when you were in ieffrey’s company, whether on the ground or in
the air, where there were other girls present whom you knew to be under age 18?
V: Yes. There was a constant influx of girls coming in and going out. And we were all very
young. On occasion, there was some older girls, and I don’t mean older as in like in their
30s or anything, I mean like 28, 29, something like that, just very rarely. The majority of
the girls that Jeffrey actually met or had on his plane or in his house were under age.
iS:
Do you know how it is that Jeffrey established with any ofthese underage girls?
V: Yes, I do. He would send me personally or with other girls to clubs or shops, to pick up
anywhere, I mean we were constantly on the look for other girls that might satisfy
Jeffrey.
iS:
What instructions were you given about what to look for?
V: Young, pretty, you know, a fun personality. They couldn’t be black. If they were any
other descent other than white, they had to be exotically beautiful. That was just about it.
iS:
Who gave you those criteria?
V: They both gave us the instructions, and it wasn’t just me, Jeffrey asked most girls to bring
a friend and make extra money. They would use us young girls So that way it probably
looked a lot more safer to a girl that we were procuring to younger girls that were already
doing it. That was the way that Jeffrey had it.
iS:
Were you given any instruction at all on how to approach these girls?
V: Yes. Jeffrey and Ghislaine both taught me to, depending on the circumstances,
depending on the girl, you could offer them a job as a massage therapist or you could tell
them you have a really rich friend with, you know, great contacts in the acting world or
modeling world and he loves pretty girls, you should come back and meet him, make
some money, you know, we had a whole bunch of ways to be able to procure girls.
JS:
Can you give me any idea as to the total number of underage girls that you know engaged
in sexual conduct with Jeffrey during the period of time you had your relationship with
him?
V: I would have no way of estimating that whatsoever. I mean, there could be a hundred,
there could be more, honestly I’m not too sure how many girls, really. I wish I did know.
I mean like I said there were so many over the course of 4 years with Jeffrey.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 16 of23
iS: Let me see if we can try to narrow it down a little bit. Is there any doubt in your mind
that it was more than 10?
V: Yes, there was definitely more than 10.
iS: Ok, what I want you to do is to give me the highest number that you are comfortable in
saying there were definitely more than X number of underage girls that I know Jeffrey
Epstein engaged in sex with while I had a relationship with him. How would you fill in
that blank? Definitely more than how many?
V: I’d say definitely more than a hundred.
iS: Alight. Did ieffrey ever help to pick out your clothes?
V: Oh yes. I mean he wasn’t out to dress me like a porn star or anything. He would always
dress me very classy, but ‘we’d just go shopping all the time together.
is: Did he ever express any style preferences in terms of how he wanted you to dress?
Besides dressing classy, I’m, you know, any other suggestion to you about how he
wanted you dressed?
V: He didn’t, like I said, wasn’t trying to dress me in any prostitute way or anything like
that. It was nice, classy outfits I was wearing like Gucci, Dolce Gabbana, Chanel, things
like that. He was buying me a lot of very, very nice clothing. It was provocative. I mean
I was wearing miniskirts, and tight short shorts and little shirts that showed my belly and
my cleavage and everything, but they were very expensive clothes.
iS:
Was there every any dress up role playing?
V: Yes. There was. Lots of it. Jeffrey loved the latex outfits Ghislane had for us girls, he
had bondage outfits, he had all different kinds of outfits, but his favorite was the
schoolgirl.
iS:
Tell me about that.
V: Well, you know, Ghislaine would take me to dress me up to surprise i.E or Jeffrey would
ask me to get dressed up, that would include wearing a tiny little skirt with nothing
underneath, a white collared shirt that you would be wearing to school with a tie in it, tied
up _in a bow, my hair in pigtails, stockings on up to my knees, and I would go in there
and act like a kid and we’d do role playing sexing.
iS: Did ieffrey ever brag to you about the age of any of the girls with whom he had
relationships?
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 17 of23
V: Yes, he did. He did all the time. The worst one that I heard from his own mouth was this
pretty 12 year old girls he had flown in for his birthday. It was a surprise birthday gift
from one of his friends and they were from France. I did see them, I did meet them.
Jeffrey bragged afterwards after he met them that they were 12 year olds and flown over
from France because they’re really poor over there, and their parents needed the money
or whatever the case is and they were absolutely free to stay and flew out. Those were
the worst ones. He was constantly bragging about girls’ ages or where he got them from
or their past and how terrible their past was and good he is making it for them.
iS: Where were the 12 year old girls flown to from France? Where did they come to?
V: Palm Beach.
iS:
And were they flown in on Jeff’s private plane or did they get transported?
V: No. They were transported by somebody else.
iS: Ok. Was the sexual activity that went on on the airplane conducted in such a way so that
any of the crew was aware of what was going on?
V: They were told to knock if they had to come out, if the crew had to come out. They were
told, you know, to come out as little as possible, so they weren’t out there hanging out
watching everything, no, but it doesn’t take an idiot to put two and two together to say
well there’s a whole bunch of half dressed teenagers on board with this old man who is
constantly being massaged by them and he wants me to keep the door shut for what
reason? I mean, only they could put that together, but yeah, they knew.
iS:
Did Mr. Epstein ever talk to you about people of power and influence owing him favors?
V: He would laugh about it, you know, I never really knew what to take serious from Jeffrey
because he was such a funny character at times. You never knew if what he was saying
was true or not. Yeah, lots of people owed him favors from what he told me. He’s got
everybody in his pocket, and he would laugh about he helps people for the sole purpose
in the end they owe him something. That’s why I believe he does so many favors in the
first place.
iS:
When and how did you first become aware that Mr. Epstein was in trouble with the law?
V: I was first informed by, I think someone from the FBI called me first and started to ask
me questions, and I started to answer the questions but then fear took over, and I just said
look, I don’t know what’s going on, I’ve got a young family that I don’t want to risk, you
know, please don’t bother me about this again, and it was real short simple conversation,
and within a week or 2, I had gotten a call from Jeffrey’s attorney, and then a week later,
Jeffrey himself.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 18 of 23
is:
Ok, well let’s back up before we get to those conversations and tell me approximately
when it was that you were contacted by the person who you believe was with the FBI.
V: Ok. It’s hard for me to pinpoint, if I had to pinpoint it, it would be in 2007 sometime.
iS: Alight. And you were living in Australia at that time, correct?
V: Correct.
iS:
You were contacted by telephone?
V: That’s correct, by my cell phone.
iS:
Ok and do you have any idea how your name came up leading to that contact.
V: No idea. No idea whatsoever. When I did ask, I was told that some girls had revealed
my name, I guess, and that’s how everybody, the FBI knew to contact me.
iS:
OK.
V: But I don’t know ofthand or sorry, I just walked into the wrong room.
iS:
Ok.
V: Sorry go on.
iS: Yes & I’ll never tell her you said that. Virginia, how long was it after that phone call
from the FBI person were you contacted by Mr. Epstein’s lawyers.
V: Like a week. It was back to back to each other. I remember being so scared after talking
to the FBI thinking what’s happening, what’s going on. It’s been like 6 years, 7 years at
that stage, how did they find me & what do I have to do with this? So yeah, I do
remember that very well, and it was only about a week later I was called by his attorney.
iS:
Who was it that contacted you, do you remember?
V: I want to say Bill Riley, but he might have been from the FBI. No, it was Bill Riley. Bill
Riley. Not sure ifthat’s his correct name, but that’s what is coming to mind
JS:
What do you remember about that conversation?
V: I remember a Mr. Goldberger as well, I remember, there might have been two of them.
iS:
Airight.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 19 of23
V: I can’t remember which one it was. I want to say Bill Riley is the good one.
iS:
Airight, so either Bill Riley or a Mr. Goldberger or both of them contacted you, and what
do you remember about that?
V: I don’t know if it was the same guy who contacted me that week later who put me in
touch with Jeffrey. I think he was on the phone and he put speakerphone on with Jeffrey.
So he connected me with Jeffrey. I don’t know if it was the same guy or different, but I
definitely know that Bill Riley was the first guy to contact me. I’m pretty sure about that.
JS:
Ok. Tell me about that conversation.
V: He asked me what I knew about what’s going on with Jeffrey and apparently, there was
an investigation being held about some of the girls who had come out and said that
Jeffrey had sexual contact with them under the age of a minor and that he was
discrediting lot of these girls and making them out to be drug addicts and prostitutes and
what have you so they wouldn’t be looked upon as worthy in the court’s eyes so to speak.
And you know, he told me in the first five minutes that, you know, if I stay quiet, that
“I’ll be looked after”. And that was the exact way it was said. It wasn’t like you know,
I’m gonna pay you a zillion dollars or anything if you be quiet, but if I stay quiet, I would
“looked after”. And I remember saying I don’t want any part to do with this. You know,
this is not something I want to be a part of, I’ve got a young family. I wish the best for
everybody in this, you know, take care kind of thing. A week later, I was called after the
hearing by one of Jeffrey’s lawyers. I can’t tell you exactly which one it was but he had
Jeffrey on the other line and he connected Jeffrey and I, and Jeffrey tried to make some
simple conversation, “How are you? How have things been?” You know what I mean,
catching up.
JS:
Do you know if the lawyer, did the lawyer stay on the line while Jeffrey was speaking to
you?
V: I’m pretty sure he did. That’s why I think ieffrey was on speaker phone because it
sounded a lot different, and I was never taken off the line to begin with or connected to
another line, so I was pretty sure Jeffrey was on speaker phone and the lawyer was
making the call. After the simple conversation, it led to what was going on again and you
know, Jeffrey couldn’t believe it. You know, he thought he helped all these girls out. He
didn’t think he was wrong in any circumstance here at all. A lot of these girls were drug
addicts and just after drug money. You know, he was really putting down these women
or these girls I should say, not giving them the credit they deserved, and then he exactly
repeated what the lawyer said the week before is that he would look after me if I stayed
quiet, and if I need any help, you know, his lawyers would represent me and he would get
legal help for me, whatever I need, he would do, and I told him exactly, I said, “Jeffrey,
I’m the mother of two children at that stage. I’m away from everything there, I don’t
want to be a part of it. I’m not going to speak to anybody and I don’t want to speak to
anybody, I don’t want to be involved.” That was the last time I heard from him. And the
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 20 of 23
next thing I knew, I was sent my victim’s letter, my notification of being a victim through
the US Attorney’s Office and that’s when I knew it was well out there enough not to have
Jeffrey’s lawyers come back on me and discredit me in the same way he had done to all
the other girls. So, I called up Joseph Bird who was the recommended lawyers on my
paperwork that they had given me and started going from there.
JS:
So you contact Mr. ioseph Bergs’ office and then you were dealing with his office from
that point forward.
V: That’s correct.
iS: Tell me about the ending of your relationship with Jeffrey. That is, at what point in time
did your full time employment end and how did that happen?
V: Ok. So, it hadn’t really ended. I walked away from it all. Jeffrey sent me to Thailand
where I met my husband and escaped to Australia, never to return back to the states.
About 6 months prior to that, he came up with a proposition that I thought was really
disgustingly sick. And it really showed me for the first time in 4 years I had been with
him that nothing was going to change and I was always just going to be used by him(?)
which I did not like. He offered me a mansion and some of his money every month, I
forget what he called it, a monthly income of what he made to bear one of his children.
The proposition was that if anything ever happened between Jeffrey and I, that I would
have to sign my child over to him basically and that the child would be his and
Ghislaine’s, and I would be looking after it as long as nothing happened between Jeffrey
and I. So, I was kind of freaked out by all of that. I pushed Jeffrey more to please get me
some more training, you know, and I was getting older and not of as much interest to
Jeffrey anyways. I was 19 now, and he likes a female a lot younger. So he sent me to
Thailand, in September 2002. I was first supposed to meet a girl there and bring her
back with me, but I never met up with her. I proceeded get a short course in Thai massage
so that was to shut me up about my training so I went there, and one of my friends from
school invited me to watch a fight, like a muay thai fight, which is like a form
kickboxing. So I went and watched it, and I saw this guy that was a really good fighter,
and a girl’s word, looked really hot, so I asked my friend who knew him to introduce me.
We got introduced and fell in love immediately, 3 days later Rob proposed and 7 days
later I was being married in a buddist temple. I called Jeffrey and told him I’m sorry, I’m
never coming back. I’ve gotten married, I’ve fallen in love. I thought he’d wish the best
for me but he was kind of rude and he just said “have a good life” and hung up the phone,
and that was the last time I’d talked to him ever until all this started again.
iS: Ok. Virginia, is there anything else that you would like to add to what you have told us
up to this point in time?
V: I’d like to know that this time around something’s going to be done about it and that
Jeffrey and a lot of his colleagues, no matter how rich they are, will know that there is
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page2l of23
law and that there is people that still believe in it. So that’s it. Thank you guys for
listening to me, hearing me out and helping me. It’s kind ofhard to get through.
iS:
Thank you very much. Yes, I’m sure it has been very difficult and I am very appreciative
of the courage you have shown in doing what you have done, which really brings me to
the last subject, and that is what was it that motivated you to go public with all of this?
V: Sharon Richard contacted me. I like her, I do, I like her a lot. I know she’s a journalist,
and journalists are normally bloodsucking leeches, but I like her for that, but she is an
honest bloodsucking leech. She told me a lot about what was still going on, and she
showed me a picture of Jeffrey with a little girl who looks like she could have been 12
years old. I mean it was disgusting. I agreed to talk with her, I never agreed to do
anything until she showed me some pictures, and at that stage, being a mother of 3
children and having a daughter who I would do anything for to protect, I would put my
neck on the line to make sure she never has to go through what I had to go through, and
knowing all of this, and knowing that he’s still out there doing the same exact thing with
no regrets, no remorse, no worry about what he’s doing to those girls, and all those girls
feeling the same way that I did, so I, you know, I’m doing it because I believe in my heart
of hearts it’s the right thing to do. It’s what I would want somebody to do for my
daughter or my sister or my friend, and it saddens me to know that it’s still going on right
now. It’s like the seashell story. I don’t know if you’re heard the story about the little kid
who throws back a starfish, you know, the little brother tries to ask his sister, “why do
you throw them in, they’re all gonna die anyways, the little girl says “well, it’s this one
that I can help, and this one that I can help,” and that’s what I feel like I’m doing. I’m
making a small dent in this big world we live in.
iS: I certainly appreciate that courage, and I have heard that story, and you’re absolutely
right, that one person may not be able to make a difference for everyone, but one person
can make a difference for someone, and hopefully, you are making a difference for
someone, and we’re gonna do the best we can to make sure you are making a difference
for as many people as possible.
V: Thanks iack.
iS: Just a few other follow up things I want to ask you and again, if any of these questions
are questions that you’re uncomfortable in responding to, then don’t hesitate to tell me
that. Do you have any recollection of ieffrey Epstein’s specifically telling you that “Bill
Clinton owes me favors”?
V: Yes. I do. It was a laugh though. He would laugh it off. You know, I remember asking
Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well
he owes me a favor. He never told me what favors they were. I never knew. I didn’t
know if he was serious. It was just ajoke.
is:
Where was here?
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 22 of 23
V: He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors. They’re all in each other’s
pockets.
iS:
When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here, where was here?
V: On the island.
iS:
When you were present with ieffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton on the island, who else was
there?
V: Ghislaine, Emmy, and there was 2 young girls that I could identify. I never really knew
them well anyways. It was just 2 girls from New York.
JS:
And were all of you staying at ieffrey’s house on the island including Bill Clinton?
V: That’s correct. He had about 4 or 5 different villas on his island separate from the main
house, and we all stayed in the villas.
is:
V: Yes.
Were sexual orgies a regular occurrence on the island at Jeffrey’s house?
JS: If we were to take sworn testimony from the people I am going to name, and if those
people were to tell the truth about what they knew, do you believe that any of the
following people would have relevant information about Jeffrey’s taking advantage of
underage girls? So I’ll just name a name, and you tell me yes if they told the truth, I
think they’d have relevant information or no, I don’t think they would, or I don’t know
whether they would or not. Ok? You understand?
V: Yes.
JS: Ok. Les Wexner.
V: I think he has relevant information, but I don’t think he’ll tell you the truth.
J5: Ok. Alan Dershowitz.
V: Yes.
JS:
David Copperfield.
V: Don’t know.
iS:
Tommy Matola.
Edwards adv. Epstein
Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts
Page 23 of 23
V: Don’t know.
JS:
Prince Andrew.
V: Yes, he would know a lot of the truth. Again, I don’t know how much he would be able
to help you with, but seeing he’s in a lot of trouble himself these days, I think he might,
so I think he may be valuable. I’m not too sure of him.
iS: Ok. Virginia, I think that’s all I have for you. Let me tell you what I would like to do.
As I told you in the beginning of this conversation, we’ve been recording it, and
hopefully, we’ve got a clear enough recording so that we’ve taken down everything
accurately and when it’s transcribed, it will be clear and accurate, but what I would like
to do is transcribe it, send it to you, have you take a look at it, and if there’s anything that
we got wrong in the statement, you can write back and you can make changes in the
transcript so that the transcript is accurate. Is that fair?
V: No worries. That is fair. No problem.
JS: Alight, great. I really do appreciate that and tell me what the best way is to send the
transcript to you.
V: Email. If you just want to send it by email or if you want to send it by mail, either or.
iS: Ok. Give me your email address if you would please.
_______________________________*
JS:
Let me read that back to you:
V: Yepthat’sit.
BE:
Thank you ienna, appreciate it.
V: No problem, Brad.
iS:
Thank you very very much. Bye Bye now.
V: Take care Jack. Nice meeting you.
iS:
You too.
*Redaction has been made at the request of the witness.
EXHIBIT K
������������
�����
�����
���
���
��������
�����������������������������
��������������������������������
������������
��������������������������������������������������������������������
������������������������
������������������������
Thank you, Paul. I had reached out to Joan previously to be included on Jack Scarola's e-mail distribution list
for the Dershowitz suit, but I wasn't sure if this would also be handled by them.
I don't want to double up or inundate you, as I know other ITN News colleagues have also been in touch with
you. I just wanted to make sure I was on your radar if Judge Marra rules next week.
Best,
Donna Paine
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 23, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Paul Cassell <cassellp@law.utah.edu> wrote:
���������
�
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������
�
�����
�
���������������
������������������������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������������������������������������������
��������������������������������������������������������������
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�
������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������������
�����������������������������
Hi Brad and Paul --
I had reached out to you both the other week when the allegations of Jane Doe #3 first
became public. I am a freelance TV producer in South Florida, working with ITN News on this story. As
you can imagine, given her allegations against Prince Andrew, ITN is quite keen on covering this story as
soon as it breaks.
��
BE-000115
EXHIBIT L
������������
�����
�����
���
��������
������������
����������������������������������
��������������
�������������������������������������������������������
������������
�
���������������������������������������������
�
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�
�������������������������������������������������������������������������
�
Paul G. Cassell
Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah
332 S. 1400 E. , Room 101
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
(801) 585-5202 (phone)
(801) 581-6897 (fax)
cassellp@law.utah.edu
����������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
����������������������������������������������������������������
�����������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������
�����������������
����������������������������������������������������������������
You should have had from me a couple of zip files concerning VR's travel seen alongside
Prince Andrew's engagements. Has that arrived with you?
M
On 24 Jan 2015, at 00:58, Paul Cassell wrote:
�������������������������������������������������������������������������
��
����������������
�������������������������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������������
��
BE-000111
EXHIBIT M
/
Mary E. Pirrotta
From:
Mary E. Pirrotta
Sent:
January 22, 2015 9:38 AM
To:
'Lindsay.Isaac@turner.com'
Cc:
Joan Williams
Subject: Re: Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Document: Complaint (File #: 2015001.3)
Attachments:
Complaint.pdf; The Duke of York.pdf
Attached is a copy of the Complaint in Case No. CACE 15-000072 and also a copy of Mr. Scarola's letter to The Duke of
York per your request.
1
BE-000029
Begin forwarded message:
From: ""Hill, James E."" <James.E.Hill@abc.com>
Date: January 28, 2015 at 10:34:00 AM EST
To: Jack Scarola <JSX@SearcyLaw.com>
Subject: RE: Question from ABC
If possible - I'd also like to see full transcript of the 2011 phone interview you/Edwards conducted with VR
while she was still in Australia.
Original Message
From: Hill, James E.
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:31 AM
To: 'Jack Scarola'
Subject: RE: Question from ABC
Thank you
Original Message
From: Jack Scarola [mailto:JSX@SearcyLaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:19 AM
To: Hill, James E.
Subject: Re: Question from ABC
You will receive a response and copy of the deposition later this morning.
On Jan 27, 2015, at 10:00 PM, ""Hill, James E."" <James.E.Hill@abc.com> wrote:
Hi Jack - sorry to trouble you.
But wondering if you know what documents are source for a new NY Daily News story - quoting what appears
to be a Juan Alessi deposition which mentions Andrew visits to PB mansion.
Daily News cites newly filed documents. I'm not aware of any new docs that quote Alessi on the issue of
Andrew.
Can u enlighten me?
Do you have access to those portions of the Alessi depo? Not sure which case it would come from.
Is the full transcript of our telephone interview w. 0 Virginia part of the public record?
Tire 7-u/.5
I have a request from the press to provide it (s below), but I will only do that if it has been filed. °""/-
http://m.nydailynews.com/news/national/prince-andrew-sex-massages-epstein-home-repairman-article-
1.2094073
2
BE-000030
James E. Hill
Producer, ABC News
Chicago
312.899.4281 (ofc)1312.286.1691 (ce11)1312.343.3832 (cell 2)
james.e.hill@abc.com
Twitter: @jameshillabc
******************************************************************************************
Privileged and Confidential Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be
accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola
Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-
2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud.
Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of
this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be
attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
******************************************************************************************
******************************************************************************************
Privileged and Confidential Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be
accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola
Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-
2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud.
Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of
this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be
attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
******************************************************************************************
3
BE-000031
EXHIBIT N


"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014491.txt,"Underweight Travel & Leisure

- Airlines in structural decline: our European Airlines analyst thinks overcapacity
(networks set to grow 7% yoy to 2020) and competition from low cost/ ME carriers
is driving prices and passenger yields lower across the board.

- Negatively correlated to Oil: the sector is negatively correlated to the Oil price
and despite recent weakness, our Commodity Strategist expects OPEC to cut by
500k b/d or 1 million b/d. Should OPEC cut with firm quotas and a tight control
mechanism, they see WTI prices averaging $59/bbl.

+ Watch UK consumer confidence closely: the combined effect of the challenges
we identified earlier starting to mount for the UK consumer and the drop in the
value of the pound could reduce demand for and expenditure on overseas holidays.
This would weigh on the travel operator part of the sector. If the bulk of sterling
move is over the boost for dollar earnings like Compass will also likely fade.

¢ Peak returns: unlike Retail, T&L margins (98%ile since 2004) and RoEs (85%ile) are
close to all-time highs. We think returns may well have peaked therefore given the
backdrop of rising oil, weakening consumer confidence in the UK and structural
overcapacity in airlines. This is reflected in the fact that PBV are on 2.8x for the
sector, which is top quintile for the sector since 2004.

Chart 70: Competition & overcapacity pushing airline yields down Chart 71: Rising oil would weigh on Travel earnings
a 140 6
120 8
100 10
= 1
é 80 : 12
; 60 14
° 40 ee Brent Oil 6
20 commen BofAML WTI forecasts 18
0 ee Stoxx Travel & Leisure EPS (RHS - inverted}
> Ke} ico} | eed foe) Lo?) fam) ~~ N oO — WwW oO NM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
2222 2222222222
Arran ———Luthersa ——=—AIAG cue —Ayanar Wine Ar
SoureesConpannlia Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Bloomberg, Datastream, IBES
Chart 72: The UK consumer will have lower purchasing power next year Chart 73: Yet sector RoEs remain close to all-time highs
10 0.75 24.0%
—— GfK UK Consumer Confidence
Index 0.7 22.0%
0 SALAM ——Travel & Leisure RoE
0.65 awe
-10 06 18.0%
16.0%
-20 0.55
14.0%
0.5
-30 12.0%
0.45
10.0%
-40 0.4
oor KT NNO Oh Mehl tThClU TUL YH YH O 8.0%
LF gots u at is gat = mS a te u mals iJ gots > ire} oO | eed foe) oO oO ~~ N oD — WwW ce
©£ sa £& BSB £& B&B £& B&B £& 5B 2 Sd 8S a S&S F&F =
Sag TS"" ar aeseas RFS RRRRRRRRE
Source: Bloomberg Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Datastream, IBES
: Bankof America
32 European Equity Strategy | 01 December 2016 Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014491
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029251.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 12/7/2015 7:04:18 PM
To: Lisa New
Subject: Re: and....another bit of advice ...2P on WA

Importance: — High

send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Lisa New <> wrote:
Dear Jeffrey,

As you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online,
for broadcast, anywhere.

It was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to
you for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got
this very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it would
take us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I taped
Woody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s)

Well, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our
course on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport,
and Play

I would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is
whether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter,

Other performers who have already taped with me include

John Lithgow,
Diane Paulus
Julie Taymor
Nas

Eve Ensler
Damian Woetzel
Kate Burton

Lil Buck Riley
Alfre Woodard
Herbie Hancock
Tony Kushner
Natalia Zukerman

and those who have agreed to tape with me include

Sally Field

Lena Dunham

Yo Yo Ma

Anna Deveare Smith
and more.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029251
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033030.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 9/12/2017 5:07:53 AM 
To: Lesley Groff 
Subject: Fwd: Interview with Futurism 
----------Forwarded message--------- 
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Date: Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 7:07 AM 
Subject: Re: Interview with Futurism 
To: 
Yes 
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:30 AM wrote: 
Scheduled. Would you have 30 min - 1 h before/after. Will tell you some more ideas about your interviews and 
science support 
On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:59 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
yes 
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:59 PM, wrote: 
nice. should we coordinate it with Leslie? 
I'd can join it too, I'm in NYC next week 
On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:51 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
yes happy to do in person 
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:51 PM, 
great. when is good? 
are you coming to New York next week? 
On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
yes 
wrote: 
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM,___________________________________________wrote: 
Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) 
would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy. 
Would you be open to talk to them? 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033030 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033031 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033032 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030781.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2/26/2018 5:01:50 AM 
To: Steve Bannon 
Subject: Re: 
fun. have you come across lisa monaco yet. obama counter terroism girl. ? our cripto coin issues are us 
based. tax predominately. , regualtion, disclosure etc. world wide, a whole different bag. . debit cards. usb 
, some bad shit . very bad. 
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Steve Bannon < wrote: 
NSA has em 
On Feb 25, 2018, at 11:49 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Did you ask him for Hillary's emails;) 
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:47 PM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Remember if you bought bitcoin at 1000 dollars and after it went to 10000. You then buy furniture at 
overstock. You have a 9000 GAIN to pay tax on in real dollars. 
At some point treasury should put forth a voluntary disclosure program and fuck all the bad guys . Don't 
disclose . Tax evasion 
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:42 PM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Understood but there is an office of terroism finance at treasury that has thought about tax 
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:39 PM Steve Bannon < 
Treasury not driving nsc is 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
wrote: 
From: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 04:33:00 +0000 
To: Steve Bannon< 
Subject: 
Will treasury respond to you re crypto or do we need another way in for advice 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030781 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030782 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030783 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019922.txt,"“... and then it became really sunny and I walked off and it poured right after I left. It
poured but we have something amazing because—honestly it looked like a million,
million and a half people, whatever it was it was, but it went all the way back to the
Washington Monument and by mistake I get this network and it showed an empty field
and it said we drew two hundred fifty thousand people. Now that’s not bad, but it’s a lie...
. And we had another one yesterday which was interesting. In the Oval Office there’s a
beautiful statue of Dr. Martin Luther King and I also happen to like Churchill—Winston
Churchill—I think most of us like Churchill, doesn’t come from our country but had a lot
to do with it, helped us, real ally, and as you know the Churchill statue was taken out... .
So a reporter for Zime magazine and I have been on the cover like fourteen or fifteen
times. I think I have the all-time record in the history of 7Zime magazine. Like if Tom
Brady is on the cover it’s one time because he won the Super Bowl or something. I’ve
been on fifteen times this year. I don’t think, Mike, that’s a record that can ever be broken,
do you agree with that ... . What do you think?”

“No,” said Pompeo in a stricken voice.

“But I will say that they said it was very interesting that ‘Donald Trump took down the
bust, the statue, of Dr. Martin Luther King,’ and it was right there, there was a cameraman
that was in front of it. So Zeke ... Zeke ... from Time magazine ... writes a story that I
took it down. I would never do that. I have great respect for Dr. Martin Luther King. But
this is how dishonest the media is. Now big story, but the retraction was like this”—he
indicated ever-so-small with his fingers. “Is it a line or do they even bother putting it in? I
only like to say I love honesty, I like honest reporting. I will tell you, final time, although I
will say it when you let in your thousands of other people who have been trying to come
in, because I am coming back, we may have to get you a larger room, we may have to get
you a larger room and maybe, maybe, it will be built by somebody that knows how to
build and we won’t have columns. You understand that? We get rid of the columns, but
you know I just wanted to say that I love you, I respect you, there’s nobody I respect more.
You do a fantastic job and we’re going to start winning again, and you’re going to be
leading the charge, so thank you all very much.”

In a continuing sign of Trump’s Rashomon effect—his speeches inspiring joy or horror
—witnesses would describe his reception at the CIA as either a Beatles-like emotional
outpouring or a response so confounded and appalled that, in the seconds after he finished,
you could hear a pin drop.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019922
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011318.txt,"10

id.

12

13

14

L5

16

ne)

18

life)

20

21

22

23

24

25

15
H3VOGIU1

says we've looked and we can't find these records that you've
requested.

Now, it doesn't address the fact that the government
only typically retains records for a few years when they were
requesting records from 15 years ago, so it doesn't have the

indicia of trustworthiness to be able to say that this is

actually the fact because, of course, as we know, the
government regularly has to get rid of records.

So to use this letter to say, 'Ah-hah, he was never on

the island,' when we never got to examine him under oath and
say, ‘You traveled with him a bunch. Did you also go to the
island? My client says she met you there."" We didn't get to

ask those questions, so we're in a situation now where that
letter coming in would be highly prejudicial because the jury

will wonder, well, what does he have to say about this? And we

haven't been in a position to be able to do that.

So your Honor, for all those reasons we believe that

Mr. Freeh should b xcluded, the FOIA letter should not come
into evidence, and again, we believe that the issue of

Mr. Clinton should not be an issue relevant to this trial.

Next, your Honor, they also seek to include
statements, hearsay statements and newspaper articles about

Prince Andrew, and it's actually not his denial, as I

understand it, Buckingham Palace's denial of the allegation of

my client. But again, Prince Andrew is not on the witness

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011318
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016286.txt,"more efficiently by machines. The successful creation of AGI would be the biggest event
in human history, so why is there so little serious discussion of what it might lead to?

Here again, the answer involves multiple reasons.

First, as Upton Sinclair famously quipped, “It is difficult to get a man to
understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”!” For
example, spokesmen for tech companies or university research groups often claim there
are no risks attached to their activities even if they privately think otherwise. Sinclair’s
observation may help explain not only reactions to risks from smoking and climate
change but also why some treat technology as a new religion whose central articles of
faith are that more technology is always better and whose heretics are clueless
scaremongering Luddites.

Second, humans have a long track record of wishful thinking, flawed
extrapolation of the past, and underestimation of emerging technologies. Darwinian
evolution endowed us with powerful fear of concrete threats, not of abstract threats from
future technologies that are hard to visualize or even imagine. Consider trying to warn
people in 1930 of a future nuclear arms race, when you couldn’t show them a single
nuclear explosion video and nobody even knew how to build such weapons. Even top
scientists can underestimate uncertainty, making forecasts that are either too optimistic—
Where are those fusion reactors and flying cars?—or too pessimistic. Ernest Rutherford,
arguably the greatest nuclear physicist of his time, said in 1933—less than twenty-four
hours before Leo Szilard conceived of the nuclear chain reaction—that nuclear energy
was “moonshine.” Essentially nobody at that time saw the nuclear arms race coming.

Third, psychologists have discovered that we tend to avoid thinking of disturbing
threats when we believe there’s nothing we can do about them anyway. In this case,
however, there are many constructive things we can do, if we can get ourselves to start
thinking about the issue.

What can we do?

I’m advocating a strategy change from “Let’s rush to build technology that makes us
obsolete—what could possibly go wrong?” to “Let’s envision an inspiring future and
steer toward it.”

To motivate the effort required for steering, this strategy begins by envisioning an
enticing destination. Although Hollywood’s futures tend to be dystopian, the fact is that
AGI can help life flourish as never before. Everything I love about civilization is the
product of intelligence, so if we can amplify our own intelligence with AGI, we have the
potential to solve today’s and tomorrow’s thorniest problems, including disease, climate
change, and poverty. The more detailed we can make our shared positive visions for the
future, the more motivated we will be to work together to realize them.

What should we do in terms of steering? The twenty-three Asilomar principles
adopted in 2017 offer plenty of guidance, including these short-term goals:

(1) An arms race in lethal autonomous weapons should be avoided.

(2) The economic prosperity created by AI should be shared broadly, to benefit all
of humanity.

7 Upton Sinclair, , Candidate for Governor: And How I Got Licked (Berkeley CA: University of
California Press, 1994), p. 109.

66

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016286
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030066.txt,"access to, and almost no politically serious negotiations with, the
SCAF.

The clashes in Tahrir Square on April 9-10, which led to the deaths
of two protesters, were the most serious to date between activists and
the Army. The distance between the Army and young democratic
activists grew further on April 11, when a military court sentenced
the first blogger since the fall of Mubarak to prison for criticizing the
military.

In the SCAF’s March 30 “Constitutional Declaration,” it became
absolutely clear that, unlike Tunisia, the parliament to be elected in
September will not form a government. Articles 56 and 61 stipulate
that the SCAF will retain a broad range of executive powers until a
president is elected. Instead of Parliament acting as the sovereign
body that will write a constitution, Article 60 mandates that it is to
“elect a 100-member constituent assembly.” The big question now is
how many non-elected outside experts will end up in this “constituent
assembly” and how they will arrive there.

Of course, many still fear that Islamic fundamentalists will hijack
Egypt’s revolution. But I see that as an improbable outcome, given
the growing diversification of Muslim identities in the new context of
political freedoms, secular parties’ efforts to keep the Muslim
Brotherhood within electoral politics, and the profiles of the three
leading presidential candidates, none of whom want the Egyptian
Revolution to be captured.

In short, a successful democratic transition 1s possible in Tunisia, and
not impossible in Egypt. That fact, alone, should bolster the hopes of
Arab democratic activists elsewhere as well.

Alfred Stepan is Professor of Government at Columbia University

and the author, with Juan J. Linz and Yogendra Yadav, of the
recently published Crafting State Nations.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030066
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028629.txt,"While the decision to go seems to have technically been Ballmer’s, interviews with dozens of people inside and outside the
company, including many close to the situation, indicate that he had not aimed to leave this soon and especially after the
recent restructuring of the company that he had intensely planned.

Instead, sources said Ballmer’s timeline had been moved up drastically — first by him and then the nine-member board,
including his longtime partner and Microsoft co-founder and chairman Bill Gates — after all agreed that it was best if he left
sooner than later.

That was due to a number of increasingly problematic issues on the immediate horizon — including a potentially nasty proxy
fight, continued business performance declines and, perhaps most of all, that Ballmer’s leadership was becoming a very
obvious lightning rod.

Interestingly, Ballmer actually indicated that he had planned on staying in his letter about his impending departure, noting:
“My original thoughts on timing would have had my retirement happen in the middle of our transformation to a devices and
services company focused on empowering customers in the activities they value most.”

That sentence spurred much chatter inside the company, including the persistent rumor that Gates had dropped the bomb
on Ballmer. That sentiment was further underscored when Ballmer’s letter contained no reference or thanks to Gates, with
whom he has been tightly tethered over the last several decades. Its absence has been much discussed internally at
Microsoft, where ithas been seen as an unusual slight and a sign of a rift.

Gates also did not reference his longtime business partner in any celebratory manner in Microsoft's announcement. “Asa
member of the succession planning committee, |’ll work closely with the other members of the board to identify a great new
CEO,” said Gates, in the entirety of the quote about Ballmer’s retirement. “We’re fortunate to have Steve in his role until the
new CEO assumes these duties.”

Other sources cautioned that it was not indicative of tensions between the pair, but was done to minimize “lame duck
concerns’ that might arise if Ballmer was portrayed as already out the door.

Those sources also insist that Gates never asked Ballmer to step down sooner, although they acknowledge that he also did
not — as Gates had in the past — disagree that it was best that he move on.

“Did Gates instigate it? No,” said one source with knowledge of the situation. “But was he as supportive of Ballmer as he had
been in the past? Maybe not.”

That was still a big change, of course. Gates — who has always been and remains the key decision-maker on Microsoft's
board — had always been Ballmer’s major backer, despite increasing pressure both externally and from other directors for
him to step down.

Gates had rejected such suggestions for years. That included former director and Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, who many
sources said had been one of the first to urge that the company replace Ballmer as CEO, as well as from a spate of Wall
Street investors complaining about the company’s declining value in the Ballmer years.

As AllThingsD’s John Paczkowski wrote on Friday: “Here’s one metric by which Ballmer will be judged harshly. On the last
day of 1999, the day before he took over as CEO, Microsoft’s market capitalization was $600 billion. On the day before he
announced his intention to retire, it was less than $270 billion.”

That’s a damning number, of course, coupled with a widespread sentiment that Ballmer had missed critical trends in tech
under his tenure. Despite a strong growth in revenue, investors and others had long concluded that Microsoft had thrived
when Gates was CEO and waned under Ballmer’s rule.

Still, until recently, there has been no signal from the company indicating any change in top leadership. In fact, the
management reorganization backed strongly by the board a month ago had essentially placed Ballmer at the center of the
structure under a plan described as “One Microsoft.”

And, at the time of the restructuring announcement in July, Ballmer’s definite and clear message was that he was there to
stay:

“Lots of change. Butin all of this, many key things remains the same. Our incredible people, our spirit, our commitment, our
belief in the transformative power of technology — our Microsoft technology — to make the world a better place for billions
of people and millions of businesses around the world. It’s why | come to work inspired every day. It’s why we’ve evolved
before, and why we're evolving now. Because we’re not done. Let’s go.”

Though early in its rollout, the changes have been jarring and created a level of chaos at the company that has led to much
grumbling internally. It also did not help that the restructuring was quickly followed by a dismal Q4 performance by Microsoft.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028629
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032448.txt,"From: Kathy Ruemmler 
Sent: 1/31/2017 2:49:24 AM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
I am at dinner with a NYT reporter and have been talking to half of the press universe. Trump just declared war 
on DOJ. Bad, bad move. 
On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:46 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
trump fired yates 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032448 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029537.txt,"return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

OE ee oe ae ee i oe ee oe ee eR oe Oe ee eR OR eR OR RK RK KR KK

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

De ee ee ee ee ee ee ee i ee a

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

De ee ee ee ee ee ee ee i ee a

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029537
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028870.txt,"From: Kathy Ruemmler 
Sent: 9/19/2014 7:46:28 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Fwd: 
Importance: High 
Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way. 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid. 
----------Forwarded message---------- 
From: Kathy Ruemmler < 
Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM 
Subject: Re: 
To: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Gov is not jewish 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
reid or governor 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <____________________________> wrote: 
Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair. 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
double whoops 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Kathy Ruemmler •<__________________________________> wrote: 
Yep. And now he is a repeat offender. 
On Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kathy Ruemmler < > wrote: 
Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts. 
On Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM, ""Kathy Ruemmler"" < 
> wrote: 
Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC 
today, back in NY on Sunday morning. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot 
in surgery, and the 
""cook"" well' -- he can wait 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kathy Ruemmler < > wrote: 
Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage 
all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get 
sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028870 
""girls?""„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, 
jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( 
gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome 
guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate 
summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kathy Ruemmler < > wrote: 
Most girls do not have to worry about this crap. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. 
and financial 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Kathy Ruemmler 'i__________________________________> wrote: 
Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him. 
Sent from my iPad 
On Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
You need to talk to boss 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028871 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028872 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028873 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028874 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010760.txt,"Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz

Case No.: CACE 15-000072

Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records
Page 4 of 20

the materials in the records would be harmful to his _ professional
reputation. Carnegie recited subsection vi’s restriction on release of materials involving a
privacy right, but noted that “statements Tedder alleged were defamatory and damaging were
allegations in Carnegie's counterclaim for which she seeks damages.
These matters were not peripheral to the lawsuit; they were inherent to it.” Jd at 1312. Of
course, exactly the same principle applies here: sexual abuse allegations filed by attorneys
Edwards and Cassell for their client Ms. Virginia Giuffre are not peripheral to this lawsuit — they
are inherent to it.

To see how “inherent” the sexual abuse allegations are to this lawsuit, the Court need
look no further than Dershowitz’s counterclaim in this case. Count I of Dershowitz’s
Counterclaim (styled as “False Allegations in the Joinder Motion”) contends that Edwards and
Cassell should pay him damages because they “filed a pleading in the Federal Action titled ‘Jane
Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action’... .” Dershowitz
Counterclaim at { 14. Dershowitz’s Counterclaim then goes on to quote at length from the
Joinder Motion. His counterclaim contains, for example, this paragraph recounting the
allegations:

The Joinder Motion then goes on to allege — without any supporting evidence — as
follows:

One such powerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to
have sexual relations with was former Harvard Law Professor Alan
Dershowitz, a close friend of Epstein’s and well-known criminal defense
attorney. Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with
Dershowitz on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida
but also on private planes, in New York, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010760
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032238.txt,"From: Michael Wolff

Sent: 2/19/2016 5:44:47 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Trump

Importance: — High

NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider
preempting.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032238
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031731.txt,"315 SE 7"" Street
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

facsimile
www.tonjahaddad.com

Please add this efiling address to all pleadings: (A

The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: DAN CHRISTENSEN [mailto

Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:38 PM
To: Tonja Haddad Coleman
Subject: <no subject>

Hi, Tonja,

I’m not going to get into this in this story, but |’d still like you to address the state’s contention that Kogan signed the resisting
arrest charge against Hart. What happened?

Dan

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031731
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021963.txt,"TERSON

took him three years, working
rney’s office, Epstein finally did
;Ss maze and recover Obregon's

bank in the Cayman Islands.
na prevents us from knowing

iow much he kept. But given the
y earned millions—or more—
as nothing but appreciation for

ems,” she says. “I don't want any-

t of the deal with a new modus ,

ly work with the super rich.

104

CHAPTER. 25

i | Eva Andersson: July 8, 1980

iss Sweden, Eva Birgitta Andersson, is wearing a daz-

zling white gown and sweating, ever so slightly, under

the stage lights. But Bob Barker's about to announce the
winner of this, the twenty-ninth Miss Universe pageant, held in
Seoul, South Korea, and Eva’s smile is as wide as the ocean.

“And now that we know what Miss Universe will win, let’s

see which five girls are still in the running!”
; Barker pauses, like the expert broadcaster he is. Eva’s chest
q tightens. There are twelve women on stage, all of them beautiful —
_ even if they’re not quite as beautiful as Miss Sweden.
_ “On this card are the names of five contestants who have
f Teceived the highest total score from our judges in the personal
q iterview, the swimsuit, and the evening gown competition.”
Eva feels the camera pan across the stage—pan across her,
: tanding in between Miss Scotland and Miss Puerto Rico.

105

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021963
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022823.txt,"Does Mr Epstein have any comment regarding allegations made by a woman named in the media as Virginia Giuffre/Roberts relating
to her being sexually abused by Mr Epstein or used as a ""sex slave""?

ENDS

On 13 August 2018 at 14:52, Martin G. Weinberg EE wrote:
If you still want, send the questions. | would talk with you off the record after reviewing them (reserving the right at my
option to make an on the record statement), hope that works for you. Marty

From: Matt Williams

Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 12:41 PM
To: Martin G. Weinberq

Subject: Re: Viceland

Hello Martin,

Thank you for getting back to me. We would be looking for on record comments or a ""no comment"" to our
questions. But | am certainly happy to have an off record conversation with yourself as well. Perhaps we
could set up a time to chat briefly off record on Monday before | send you our questions for Mr Epstein?

Kind regards,
Matt

On 11 August 2018 at 11:08, Martin G. Weinberg IW rote:
Mr Williams, | am in receipt of your emails to Jackie Percyzk. If you first agree that any communications between you
and me are off the record, | would be agreeable to receiving your questions or a clip of the episode that relates to Mr
Epstein. Thanks.

Martin G Weinberg PC
20 Park Plaza

Suite 1000

Bos

Tel

Cel

ed

Virus-free. www.avast.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022823
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012177.txt,"KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

Agreement to Defer Prosecution to the State, an agreement without precedent and fraught
with substantial practical and legal hurdles to its implementation.

6. THE SDFL DID NOT DEFER TO THE STATE.
Sloman’s Letter:
e “{TJhe SDFL indicated a willingness to defer to the State the length of incarceration.”
Id., p.2.
The Truth:

* The SDFL neither deferred to the State, nor even discussed with. the State, the length of
Mr. Epstein’s incarceration. In a letter to the defense, Criminal Division Chief, Matthew
Menchel rejected the sentence contemplated by the State’s plea agreement, writing that
“the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state
imprisonment.” See Tab 40, August 3, 2007 Email from M. Menchel. Of course, this
position is contrary to Section 9-2031D of the U.S. Attorney’s Manual (indicating that
the “result” of a state prosecution is “presume/d]” to have vindicated the federal interest).
It is understandable, therefore, that Mr. Sloman might want to retreat from it now.
Indeed, the final Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) restricts the state-court judge
from exercising any of his rightful discretion and to specifically prohibit the judge from
offering probation, community control or any other alternative in lieu of incarceration.
DPA,  2(a).

7. SUGGESTION OF ADDITIONAL STATE PLEA
Mr. Sloman’s Letter:

e The parties considered: “as suggested by [the defense], a plea to state charges
encompassing Epstein’s conduct.” See Tab 1, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. Sloman, p.2,

q2.

The Truth:

e It was the government, and not the defense, that suggested a plea to state charges to
resolve the federal investigation. Andrew Lourie proposed declining prosecution in favor
of the state. Although Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney’s Office had already reached
a plea agreement, in August 2007, Mr. Sloman and AUSA Marie Villafana warned that
they intended to prosecute Epstein federally unless his counsel (i.e., not the U.S.
Attorney’s Office) sought more stringent conditions to the State’s proposed plea
agreement. These stringent conditions included, among other things, the two-year prison
term demanded by Mr. Menchel (discussed above) and a charge requiring him to register
as a sex offender.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012177
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031902.txt,"2]

When the Catholic Church [forbade cousin marriage] in the eighth
century, it wasn’t thinking about the effect on kinship. It was acting
in a self-interested way, because by cutting off these ways of kin-
groups’ keeping property, the Church ended up being the beneficiary.
So if a woman didn’t marry and didn’t have children but had a big
estate, she tended to donate it to the Church. So the Church helped
effect in Europe the breakdown of extended kinship very, very early.
Even in the beginning of the Middle Ages, people owned property as
individuals. Women could hold property — they could sell it,
alienate it, in ways that they still can’t in parts of the Arab world.
And this meant that individualism became very deeply rooted in
European society. So some individualism was already established by
the time Europe got to feudalism. And feudalism is basically a
contract — it’s one that is very hierarchical, between a stronger and
weaker person, but it is a contract between two people.

So the idea of exchange and private property dates way, way back,
hundreds of years before the Enlightenment, Reformation, etc. So I
think that the basis for European modernization traces all the way
back to developments like that. In China, in India, the exit out of
kinship was accomplished through political power, via a state that
tried to create impersonal government layered on top of a kin-based
society. And those kin-groups really never went away. Even in
contemporary China and India, in certain parts there are still kin-
groups that influence politics.

SHAFFER: But China had an impersonal government — a
meritocratic bureaucracy — without Christianity, and long before the
West did, yes?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031902
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017413.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

imprisoned.” Several years later I was being interviewed on a television show and the host asked
me what my biggest fee had been. He thought I would mention the Michael Milken or Leona
Helmsley cases, but instead I said it was in the Sharansky case. He expressed surprise saying that
he didn’t know Sharansky had any money. I said he did not but that when he put his arms around
me and gave me that hug and whispered those words, that was the biggest fee I ever earned.

Another “fee” for my work was the opportunity to speak in Carnegie Hall on behalf of Vaclav
Havel and other dissident artists in 1991. Several Americans who had fought for the human rights
of censored artists were invited to read from and discuss works banned by repressive regimes. I
had been part of a team of lawyers assembled to help Havel and other Czeck dissidents get out of
prison in the 1970s. The American readers included Garrison Keillor, Marvin Hamlisch, Peter
Ustinov, William Warfield, Martin Garbus, and Maurice Sendak. I was honored to be included
among them. My mother loved showing her friends the Carnegie Hall program, with my name
listed as a “performer.” She would tell them a variation of the old joke: A man asks a musician
carrying a violin case, “How do you get to Carnegie Hall? My mother’s answer: “Practice,
practice, practice law, like my son.”

My next encounter with Havel took place in Jerusalem during the celebration of Israel’s 60
birthday. Havel, Sharansky and I were on a panel together discussing human rights. When it was
over we got onto the same elevator. Remarkably, Mickael Gorbachev was also on the elevator.
(I knew it sounds like the beginning of a bad joke: “Havel, Sharansky, Gorbachev and
Dershowitz get into an elevator.”) Gorbachev turned to me and said, “You’re the big shot lawyer
who tried to get these people out of prison. You did a good job, but I did a better job. I’m the
one who got them out.” We all laughed and Havel turned to Gorbachev and asked, “Why didn’t
you get us out sooner?” Gorbachev replied, “I’m not that good.”

The struggle against real Apartheid

My interest in South Africa Apartheid began while I was editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal
in 1961. An article was submitted on the legal structure of the apartheid system in the country.
At that time very little was known about the legal aspects of this highly regulated practice, and
this lengthy draft laid it all out. It was my job to edit it so as to make it comprehensible to an
American audience. It was shocking to me that only a few decades after the Nuremburg Laws in
Nazi Germany, a “civilized” country, with a British and Dutch heritage, could construct a system
of laws based on overt racism and discrimination, under which racial classifications determined
who could vote, hold certain jobs, live in certain areas, be treated in good hospitals, attend public
events, enroll in schools and hold office. I was determined to help dismantle the system of
apartheid and actively joined in the campaign against it. But there were limits to what I was
prepared to do, and these limits brought me into conflict with some of the most ardent anti-
apartheid activists. Most particularly, I was not willing to support the “blacklisting” or artists

326

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017413
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021988.txt,"James PATTERSON

“Whether they love me or not, everyone agrees the greatest
and most important place in Palm Beach is Mar-a-Lago,” Trump
told the Washington Post after winning his battle. “I took this
incredible and opened it, essentially,

ultimate place and made it
that I owned it made it a lot

to the people of Palm Beach. The fact
easier to get along with the Palm Beach establishment.”
The Breakers hotel, Trump explained, “gets the [island’s]

leftovers.”

It cost $100,000 to join the club. Members paid $14,000

yearly in dues. And although Epstein had never properly joined

the club, Trump’s friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell gave Epstein

unlimited use of the facilities.
This arrangement ended when a member's

complained to her wealthy father: while relaxing at Mar-a-Lago,
house.

young daughter

she'd been approached and invited out to Epstein’s
The girl said that she had gone and that Epstein had tried to

get her to undress.
The girl’s father had gone directly to Trump, who—in no

uncertain terms—told Epstein that he was barred from Mar-a-

Lago.
Because no complain

action. But years later, a woman named Virginia Roberts wo

say that, as a young girl, she'd had an id

t was filed, the police had taken no
uld

Mar-a-Lago.
According

lawsuit against Epstein, she was

Mar-a-Lago, earning about nine d

Maxwell approach
interested in learning to be a massage therapis

to a court document Virginia fled in her civil 7
a changing-room assistant at
ollars an hour, when Ghislaine —

ed her. Maxwell asked Virginia if she was ©
t—which, it)

entical encounter at q

if

ay

i

a
%

who was also employed ai
ager. But Virginia's father s
he drove her, later that day

There, according to the
ia’s father that Ms. Maxwel
for his teenage daughter. T
room equipped with a sl
Epstein was lying, naked, c

Virginia was shocked,
experience with massages,
apy protocol. “Ms. Maxwel
on her underwear and :
[Jeffrey's] body, impliedly
expected to do,” the filing
[Virginia] to take off her c:
sive about doing this, but, in
by removing everything but
to remove her underwear a
escalated, with [Jeffrey] a
battering, exploiting, and al
in various locations, incluc
At the end of this sexua
Ms. Maxwell giddily told [
and told her she had ‘lots c

_ hundreds of dollars, told h

directed one of her employe

At the time, Virginia wa

turned out, she was. Like the other girl, Virginia told her father

I
132 4

ig

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021988
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015002.txt,"From: Weingarten, Reid [as

Sent: 7/4/2017 4:46:06 PM
To: jeevacation@gmail.com
Subject: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell

Importance: — High

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From:
Sent: Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM
TO: ns ne

Cc: Ainbanklaw [nfo; i! Denyse Sabagh;
_

Michael Baxter;

; Patrick M. Regan; i! Robert Barnett; Weingarten, Reid;
SS ; ES ; (OR
ne -ilen Kerns;
ee

Subject: Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell

We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton.

On Saturday, July 1, 2017, 12:06:29 PM EDT, i yyrote:

Rich Beckler,
Ken Adams,

Do you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr.
Beckler, as most Friday nights, no?

Yes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from
my being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was
on the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance
and association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see
below); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011-
filed case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being
tracked.

You both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom,
Ghislaine Maxwell's Jeffrey Epstein in context.)

*

We start from this following precept: (the repeating 9/11s)

1. ""Toward a New World Order"" speech by Pres. George H.W. Bush — 9/11 (1990)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015002
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033375.txt,"From: Jide Zeitlin Po

Sent: 5/4/2018 4:37:03 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem

Importance: — High
Meetings here in PB are winding down. How’s your day look tomorrow?
Separately, do you know Oleg Deripaska or Ivan Glasenberg?

On May 3, 2018, at 3:59 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

No worry both problem and solution will still be there -)

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:30 AM Jide Zcitlin > wrote:
Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window

before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note:

""Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth.

Okey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after
Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I spoke

earlier with the Vice President.

Whenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.""

On May 2, 2018, at 11:05, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Eee = be is cahriman of bubai world ports. african ports anew focus he built the palm
islands. is totally trustworthy

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM Jide Zeitlin TE > wrote:
Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his

WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today?
When's best on Friday for me to visit with you?

Bibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe.

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033375
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024261.txt,"e Matthew Green, Napster Opens Pandora’s Box: Examining How File-Sharing Services
Threaten the Enforcement of Copyright on the Internet, 63 Oh. St. L. J. 799 (2002)
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/students/groups/oslj/files/2012/03/63.2.green_.pdf archived at

https://perma.cc/H77J-TN43.
e Brad Hill, “The iTunes Influence, Part |: How Apple Changed the Face of the Music

Marketplace,” Engadget (April 29, 2013)
https://www.engadget.com/2013/04/29/the-itunes-influence-part-one/ archived at

https://perma.cc/MEU4-W5N9.
e David Kravets, “10 Years Later, Misunderstood DMCA is the Law That Saved the Web,”

Wired (October 27, 2008) https:/Awww.wired.com/2008/10/ten-years-later/ archived at
https://perma.cc/VH2T-7S7V.

e Lawrence Lessig, The Creative Commons, 55 Fla. L. Rev. 763 (2003)
http://homepages.law.asu.edu/~dkarjala/OpposingCopyrightExtension/commentary/Less

igCreativeCommonsFlaLRev2003.htm archived at https://perma.cc/T7UD-JHYZ.
e Alex Davies, “The EPA Opposes Rules That Could’ve Exposed VW’s Cheating,” Wired

(September 18, 2015)
https://www.wired.com/2015/09/epa-opposes-rules-couldve-exposed-vws-cheating/
archived at https://perma.cc/W4RK-Q6QJ.

DRM and HTML5 background readings:

e “Information about W3C and Encrypted Media Extensions (EME)” W3C (March 2016)
https://www.w3.orgq/2016/03/EME-factsheet.html archived at
https://perma.cc/4ZPR-DXTA.

e Peter Bright, “DRM in HTMLS5 is a victory for the open Web, not a defeat,” Ars Technica
(May 10, 2013)
http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/05/drm-in-html5-is-a-victory-for-the-open-web-not-

a-defeat/ archived at https://oerma.cc/UM8C-NFPV.
Day 3: Cryptocurrency

One view of the progression of digital technology has been roughly from amateur to
professional, from open to closed, and from chaotic to ordered -- as the early successes from
left field of Google, Facebook, and Twitter enter publicly-traded adulthood. At the ripe year of
2017, are there still digital disruptions to be had?

The phenomenon (and increasing literal value) of cryptocurrency -- and, for that matter, the
foundational blockchain technologies on which it can be based -- seems to indicate that there
are still surprises from left field. What does the rise of cryptocurrency tell us about the state of
cyberspace, and what should we expect -- and hope for -- next?

Readings:
Introduction

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024261
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027402.txt,"Sender:

Time: 08/19/18 05:42:38 PM (556418558)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: E0727F94-1C83-4995-AD0D-996A37F550D5
Message: <Unsupported Message Content>

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/19/18 07:05:59 PM (556423559)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 29C305CC-6399-4785-9E6 1 -00C 15FCD45F4
Message: Wow

Sender:

Time: 08/19/18 07:07:44 PM (556423664)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: B8C6C074-8F54-4EF2-ACE6-35FCA7A71A9E
Message: Wedding in Bogota

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/21/18 11:03:28 AM (556567408)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 87D25B33-716C-4B88-A03F-2829DA876C5C

Message: On the news someone blew tires and will need to have emergency landing

Sender: +

Time: 08/21/18 11:05:28 AM (556567528)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F4417737-4978-4FOD-B06A-486593 1805B0
Message: | |

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/21/18 11:13:18 AM (556567998)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2088D539-B242-4D8D-A727-E005AD2829D6
Message: Rappers post malone?

Sender: +16463880059

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027402
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025884.txt,"Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

To: “Jeffrey Epstein"" <jeevacation@gmail.com>,
Cc: ""Martin Weinberg""

“dkiesq""

Date: Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:31 PM

Privileged - Redacted

Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.

20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000

Boston, MA 02116

This Electronic Message contains

information from the Law office of

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025884
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021750.txt,"communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
Copyright of Darren K. Indyke - © 2019 Darren K. Indyke — All rights reserved.

KKKKKEKKEKEKEK KEKE KEKE KEK KEKK KEK EK KE KEK KEKE KEE KE KEK ERE EK EK EK KEK EE KEK EK KEK EK EK EK EK EE KEE KEK EK EE EE KEKE KEKE EK EE KEKE EK EE KEKE EKER EK
Begin forwarded message:
From: J <jeevacation@gmail.com>

Subject: Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald
Date: March 14, 2019 at 12:48:11 PM EDT

To: Martin Weinber , Darren Indyke < , Kathy
Ruemmler , Jack Goldberger

a Forwarded message ---------

From: Darren Indyke
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:30 PM
Subject: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald

To: jeevacation@gmail.com <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Ce: Darren Indyke

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html

Jeffrey Epstein prosecutor was
previously rebuked for handling of a
child sex case

Julie K. Brown

Nine months before cutting a covert plea deal with sex trafficking suspect Jeffrey
Epstein, Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta was notified that the lead

prosecutor in Epstein’s case had concealed victim information in another underage
sex crimes case, the Miami Herald has learned.

The prosecutor, A. Marie Villafana, was harshly rebuked by a federal judge in
January 2007 for what he called her “intentional and/or serious lapse in judgment”
when she failed to explicitly inform him that the defendant, a Texas man who
traveled to Florida to have sex with a 14-year-old girl, had a prior history of
predatory behavior with minors, court records show.

Acosta, her boss at the time, not only knew about Villafafia’s breach — records show
that he subsequently defended it. Acosta assigned another prosecutor in his office to

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021750
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022610.txt,"preferential legislation ora favorable regulation.

‘The word “corruptly” connotes an evil motive or

purpose, an intent to wrongfully influence the

recipient.
S.Rep. No. 95-114, at 10.
% See 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-1(a), 78dd-2(a), 78dd-3(a).
7 See, C85 Complaint, SEC v. Monsanto Co., No. 05-cv-14 (D.D.C.
Jan. 6, 2005) (among other things, the company paid a $50,000 bribe
to influence an Indonesian official to repeal an unfavorable law, which
was not repealed despite the bribe), available at http://www.sec.gov/
litigation/ complaints/ comp19023. pdf; Criminal Information, United
States v. Monsanto Co., No. 05-cr-8 (D.D.C. Jan. 6, 2005), available at
http ://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/monsanto-co/0 1-06-
O5monsanto-info.pdf.
Jury instructions in FCPA cases have defined “corruptly” consistent
with the definition found in the legislative history. See, e.g, Jury
Instructions at 22-23, United States v. Esquenazi, supra note 44; Jury
Instructions at 10, United States v. Green, supra note 44; Jury Instructions
at 35, United States v. Jefferson, supra note 44; Jury Instructions at 25,
United States v. Bourke, supra note 44; Jury Instructions at 17, United
States v. Kay, supra note 44; Jury Instructions at 5, United States v. Mead,
supra note 44,
79 See Complaint, SEC vy. Innospec, Inc., No. 10-cv-448 (D.D.C. Mar.
18, 2010), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter SEC v. Innospecl, available at http://
www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/20 10/comp2 1454.pdf; Criminal
Information at 8, United States v. Innospec Inc., No. 10-cr-61 (D.D.C.
Mar. 17,2010), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter Uvited States v. Jnnospec],
available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/innospec-
inc/03-17- 10innospec-info.pdf.
80 See Complaint, SEC v. Innospec, supra note 79; Criminal Information,
United States v. Innospec, supra note 79.
81 See 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-1(c)(2)(A), 78dd-2(g)(2)(A), and 78dd-3 (3)(2)
© Compare 15 U.S.C. § 78ff{(c)(1)(A) (corporate criminal liability under
issuer provision) with § 78 fi{c)(2)(A) (individual criminal liability under
issuer provision); compare 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2(g)(1)(A) (corporate
criminal liability under domestic concern provision) with § 78dd-2(g)
(2)(A) (individual criminal liability under issuer provision); compare
15 US.C. § 78dd-3(e)(1)(A) (corporate criminal liability for territorial
provision) with § 78dd-3(e)(2)(A) (individual criminal liability for
territorial provision). However, companies still must act corruptly.
See Section 30A(a), 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1(a); 15 US.C. §§ 78dd-2(a),
78dd-3(a).
83 United States v. Kay, 513 F.3d 432, 448 (Sth Cir. 2007); see also
Jury Instructions at 38, United States v. Esquenazi, supra note 44; Jury
Instructions at 10, United States v. Green, supra note 44; Jury Instructions
at 35, United States v. Jefferson, supra note 44; Jury Instructions at 25,
United States v. Bourke, supra note 44; Jury Instructions at 5, United States
v. Mead, supra note 44.
* Bryan v. United States, 524 US. 184, 191-92 (1998) (construing
“willfully” in the context of 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(1)(A)) (quoting Ratzlaf v.
United States, 510 US. 135, 137 (1994)); see also Kay, 513 E3d at 446-
51 (discussing Bryan and term “willfully” under the FCPA).
® Kay, 513 E3d at 447-48; Stichting Ter Behartiging Van de Belangen
Van Oudaandeelhouders In Het Kapitaal Van Saybolt Int'l BV. v.
Schreiber, 327 F.3d 173, 181 (2d Cir. 2003).
86'The phrase “anything of value” is not defined in the FCPA, but the
identical phrase under the domestic bribery statute has been broadly
construed to include both tangible and intangible benefits. See, £5
United States v. Moore, 525 F.3d 1033, 1048 (11th Cir. 2008) (rejecting
defendant’s objection to instruction defining sex asa “thing of value?
which “unambiguously covers intangible considerations”); United
States v. Gorman, 807 F.2d 1299, 1304-05 (6th Cir. 1986) (holding that
loans and promises of future employment are “things of value”); United
States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 622-23 (2d Cir. 1983) (approving jury
instruction that stock could be a “thing of value” if defendant believed it
had value, even though the shares had no commercial value, and noting
that “[t]he phrase ‘anything of value’ in bribery and related statutes has
consistently been given a broad meaning”).
87 Section 30A(a), 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1(a); 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-2(a), 78dd-
3{a) (emphasis added).
88 Like the FCPA, the domestic bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 201, prohibits

Endnotes

giving, offering, or promising “anything of value.” Numerous domestic
bribery cases under Section 201 have involved “small” dollar bribes.

See, 6.85 United States v. Franco, 632 F.3d 880, 882-84 (Sth Cir. 2011)
(affirming bribery convictions of inmate for paying correctional officer
$325 to obtain cell phone, food, and marijuana, and noting that 18
US.C. § 201 does not contain minimum monetary threshold); United
States v. Williams, 216 F.3d 1099, 1103 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (affirming
bribery conviction for $70 bribe to vehicle inspector); United States v.
Traitz, 871 F.2d 368, 396 (3rd Cir 1989) (affirming bribery conviction
for $100 bribe paid to official of Occupational Health and Safety
Administration); United States v. Hsieh Hui Mei Chen, 754 F.2d 817,
822 (9th Cir. 1985) (affirming bribery convictions including $100 bribe
to immigration official); United States v. Bishton, 463 F.2d 887, 889
(D.C. Cir. 1972) (afirming bribery conviction for $100 bribe to division
chief of District of Columbia Sewer Operations Division).

89 Complaint, SEC v. Daimler AG, supra note 48; Criminal Information,
United States v. Daimler AG, supra note 48.

2» Complaint, SEC v. Halliburton Company and KBR, Inc., No. 09-cv-
399 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2009), ECF No 1 [hereinafter SEC v. Halliburton
and KBR], available at http ://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/
comp20897. pdf; Criminal Information, United States v. Kellogg

Brown & Root LLC, No. 09-cr-71, ECF No. 1 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2009)
[hereinafter United States v. KBR], available at hetp:/ /www.justice.gov/
criminal/fraud/ fepa/ cases/, kellogeb /02-06-09kbr-info. pdf.

al Complaint, SEC v. Halliburton and KBR, supra note 90; Criminal
Information, United States v. KBR, supra note 90.

» See, 0.85 Complaint, SEC v. RAE Sys. Inc., No. 10-cy-2093 (D.D.c.
Dec. 10, 2010), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter SEC v. RAE Sys., Ine] (fur

coat, among other extravagant gifts), available at hetp:/ /www.sec.gov/
litigation/ complaints/ 2010/comp21770 pdf; Non-Pros. Agreement,

In re RAE Sys. Inc. (Dec. 10, 2010) [hereinafter Iz re RAE Sys. Inc.
(same), available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fepa/ cases/
rae-systems/12-10-1 Orae-systems.pdf; Complaint, SEC v. Daimler AG,
supra note 48 (armored Mercedes Benz worth €300,000); Criminal
Information, United States v. Daimler AG, supra note 48 (same).

3 See Complaint, SEC v. ABB Ltd, No. 04-cv-1141 (D.D.C. July

6, 2004), ECF No. 1, available at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/
complaints/ comp 18775.pdf; Criminal Information, United States v.
ABB Vetco Gray Inc., et al., No. 04-cr-279 (S.D. Tex. June 22, 2004),
ECF No. 1 [hereinafter United States v. ABB Vetco Gray], available

at http ://wwwjustice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/abb/06-22-
O4abbvetco-info.pdf.

ms Complaint, SEC y. UTStarcom, Inc. No. 09-cv-6094 (N.D. Cal. Dec.
31, 2009), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter SEC v. UTStarcom), available at
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp2 1357.pdf; Non-
Pros. Agreement, In re UTStarcom Inc. (Dec. 31, 2009) [hereinafter Jz re
UTStarcom], available at http: //www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fepa/
cases/utstarcom-inc/ 12-3 1-09utstarcom-agree.pdf.

8 Complaint, SEC v. UTStarcom, supra note 94; Non-Pros. Agreement,
Inve UTStarcom, supra note 94,

% Complaint, SEC v. UTStarcom, supra note 94; Non-Pros. Agreement,
Inve UTStarcom, supra note 94,

EL Complaint, SEC v. Lucent Technologies Inc., No. 07-cv-2301 (D.D.c.
Dec. 21, 2007), ECF No.1 [hereinafter SEC v. Lucent), available at
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2007/comp20414.pdf; Non-
Pros. Agreement, In re Lucent Technologies (Noy. 14, 2007) [hereinafter
Inve Lucent], available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/
cases/lucent-tech/11- 14-07lucent-agree.pdf.

28 Complaint, SEC v. Lucent, supra note 97; Non-Pros. Agreement, J re
Lucent, supra note 97.

» The company consented to the entry ofa final judgment permanently

108

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022610
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024542.txt,"™ Grade expansion. 12 continues to expand its curriculum and services and plans to begin
development of grades 10-12 in the fall of 2006.

& ADA funding. The level of funding generally increases at approximately 2% per year.

With four times the number of students of its next competitor, k12 is the largest for-profit manager of
virtual schools.

Virtual Schools Managed by For-Profit Educational Management Companies

Public Schools under Number of which are Students in Virtual

Company Location Management Virtual Schools Schools

k12 McLean, VA 15 15 14,460
White Hat Management Akron, OH 38 2 3,508
Connections Academy Baltimore, MD 10 10 1,081
Pinnacle Education Tempe, AZ 9 1 212
Sequoia Charter Schools Mesa, AZ 11 1 160
Designs for Learning St. Paul, MN 10 1 50

Note: Schools ranked by students in 2004—05 school-year.
Source: Harris Nesbitt based on information compiled by Education Policy Studies Research Unit at Arizona State University.

13.4. Curriculum to School Districts of Traditional Classrooms (3% 2006E Revenue)

k12 piloted its core elementary school science program for several school districts, including Philadelphia.
The initial results of this pilot program were promising.

Case Study: William H. Hunter Elementary School

Background, In the Spring of 2004 the School District of Philadelphia wished to give a rebirth to one of its
lowest performing schools, the William H. Hunter Elementary School. k12 was selected as a partner to
provide innovative curriculum and professional development to implement a learning environment that
leverages the latest technology. As part of the k12 implementation, the District outfitted each room with
high-speed internet access, a ceiling-mounted data projection system, and interactive whiteboards. The
goal was to have Hunter become one of the District's, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s, first
web-based public, traditional schools.

Of Hunter's 600 students, 95% qualify for the federal Free and Reduced Lunch program and 25% study
English as a Second Language (ESL). Therefore, the move and the District's initiative truly marked a
tremendous opportunity for both Hunter's teachers and students alike.

Scope of Services. The fall of 2004 marked the official launch of the program and the k12 curriculum was
provided for all math, science, art and history courses. This included providing all curriculum components
including text books, teacher guides, manipulatives, equipment, assessments, art supplies and all the
online lessons and teaching tools for these subjects.

The Hunter teaching staff did an impressive job of effectively implementing the program. k12 trainers
worked closely with teachers to adopt the new curriculum and to share best methods on applying the
technology. Throughout the year, k12 trainers were invited to attend and help present ongoing staff
trainings. Additionally, grade level teams and school leaders worked regularly with k12 to develop
coherent plans for boosting student achievement.

Results / Conclusions: After the first full-year of implementing the k12 program, Hunter achieved
impressive gains on the state math exams.” In third grade, there was a 46 percentage point increase (as

*° The Pennsylvania Department of Education mandates all public schools in the Commonwealth implement its Pennsylvania System of State
Assessment (PSSA). The PSSA is a standards-based exam for measuring specific skills in math and reading, and beginning in 2006-07 science.

109

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024542
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022259.txt,"the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

BS HR FS COIS SOIC SIE FS COIS C24 SIE IE COIS OIE SIE FIC COIS OIC SOIC FIC COIS I 2 SOIC FS COIS IC 2IC OIE FIC 2 OS I 2 IS 2IC FS 2 2S 24k 2 2k 2K 2k

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Dh de eee de ee ed ee Se ed ee ee ee ed ee ee a eo

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022259
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019077.txt,"FD-302 (Rev. 10-6-95)

af w
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Date of transcription 12/01/2006
date of birth[
residing at

home telephone number cellular b6

telephone numbers was interviewed b7c

at the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) PALM BEACH COUNTY

RESIDENT AGENCY (PBCRA), located at 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm

Beach, Florida. Also present at the interview was Attorney

[sdJof LYONS AND SANDERS, 600 Northeast 3rd Avenue, Ft

Lauderdale, Florida 33304, telephone number(s) [Jana
(cellular) and Attorney [Ll —“Cti—C] Cf ATTTEERBURRYY

GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue 1400, West Palm

Beach, Florida 33401, telephone number aa te after being

advised of the identity of the interviewing agents and the nature

of the interview, [ __ ]oneviaed the following information:

lace of birth

is currently a full time pilot employed _b
JEFFREY EPSTEIN as[___——si'dwW£or_EPSTEIN's airplanes. has
been employed by EPSTEIN since Prior employment

included piloting [ __ for The Limited Brands, specifically
ee) He Peden wor ag for] | and remained
there until the was offered an opportunity
to advance and took a piloting job, flying executives for the

Venetian Hotels, Las Vegas, Nevada. Due to difficulties with the
Chairman of the Board, er
ThroughL__———dsi association with EPSTEIN's
contact with EPSTEIN while working
or was offered his current employment.
stated that while piloting for[_____]he had not seen any young
females passengers.
stated his current salary is
was paid a Christmas bonus of gross income.
stated that EPSTEIN has three full time captains with one
being the chief captain, stated that in his
osition he would be ""on call."" continued explaining that
SS would contact him providing short notice, usually a days
notice, when EPSTEIN would need him to pilot an aircraft.

When piloting an aircraft for EPSTEIN,[ sor the co-
pilot would always complete two forms. The first form, required by
the FAA, was a maintenance log, which would record the date of

Investigation on 11/27/2006 a West Palm Beach, Florida

File # 31E4MM-10806 Date dictated 12/01/2006

by

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your a: Y3
it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.
_— B/E nu -/0% 0b 2—

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019077
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011495.txt,"showing my feelings, beyond my immediate family and a few close friends.
When I was in the army, this wasn’t an issue. Self-control, especially in high-
pressure situations, was a highly valued asset. But in politics, I think that it did for a
considerable time inhibit my ability to connect with the public, or at least with
the news media that played such a critical intermediary role. And it caused me
to be seen not just as reserved or aloof, but sometimes as cold, or arrogant.

I did get much that I value from my parents. From my mother, her
boundless energy, activism, her attention to detail, and her focus on causes
larger than herself — her belief that politics mattered. Also her love for art and
literature. When I would come home from the children’s dormitory to my
parents’ room — just nine feet by ten, with a wooden trundle bed to save space
during the day — there was always a novel or a book of verse sharing the small
table with my parents’ most single prized possession: their kibbutz-issue radio.

As achild, however, I spent much more time with my father. He was my
guide, my protector and role model. Like my mother, he never mentioned the
trials which they and their families endured before arriving in Palestine. Nor did
they ever speak to me in any detail about the Holocaust. No one on the kibbutz
did. It was as if the memories were scabs they dared not pick at. Also, it
seemed, because they were determined to avoid somehow passing on these
remembered sadnesses to their sons and daughters. Still, when I was ten or
eleven, my father did — once, inadvertently — open a window on his childhood.
Every Saturday morning, we would listen to a classical music concert on my
parents’ radio. One day, as the beautiful melodies of Tchaikovsky’s violin
concerto in D came through the radio, I was struck by the almost trancelike look
that came over my father’s face. He seemed to be in another, faraway, place.
When the music ended, he turned and told me about the first time he’d heard it.
It was on the train ride into Crimean exile with Itzila and Meir in the early days
of the First World War. The train took five days to reach the Crimea and
sometimes halted for hours at a time. Every evening, a man at the far end of
their carriage would take out his violin and play the second movement of the
Tchaikovsky concerto.

I have heard the piece in concert halls many times since. When the orchestra
begins the second movement — with the violin notes climbing higher, trembling
ever so subtly — it sends a shiver down my spine. I can’t help thinking of the
railway car in which my then four-year-old father and other Jews from
Ponovezh escaped the Great War of 1914. And of other trains, in another war 25
years later, carrying Jews not to safety but to death camps.

24
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011495
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 4/23/2015 5:44:25 PM
To: Melanie Spinella
Subject: Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Enud Barak

a Forwarded message ----------

From: Ehud Barak

Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:34 AM

Subject: Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak
To: Epstein Jeffrey <Jeevacation@ gmail.com>

Hi Jeff

Bill Clinton 1994.
Food for thought.
EB

http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298

Sent from my iPhone

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026355
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010953.txt,"depreciation. That implies that it includes all free growth of the larger factor. And
these huge flows would figure to be uncorrelated. Depreciation of either factor is a
steady drag on growth, while free growth is revealed in the charts and tables as a
bucking bronco which might be double-digit positive one year and double-digit
negative the next. No wonder that national accounts cannot reliably tell good years

from bad.

Another distortion in the Y=I+C equation is the undue prominence given to
consumption. Physical capital, in most views including mine, is only a third to a fifth
of total including human capital. Human capital is the lion’s share. Pure
consumption is most of consumption, in my view, but not all of consumption. If the
factors grow in mutual proportion, then, the ratio of total capital growth to pure
consumption will be much higher than of net investment to all of consumption. That
explains, | think, why national accounts have reported not a single year of negative
net product in any of the eight countries since inception. Balanced portfolios report
negative total returns every few years. So would net product, were it not dominated
artificially by the steady positive of consumption. It is as if a portfolio dominated by
investment grade bonds were taken as representative of a realistically balanced

portfolio.

Solving the Age-Wage Puzzle

I will now try to solve a feature that troubled Ben-Porath and has troubled many
economists since. I call it the age-wage puzzle. Age-wage profiles are published
reports comparing pay earned by all working ages at the same time. Since all
cohorts (same-age sets) are compared at once, as in a family portrait, age-wage
profiles do not show effects of technological growth over time. They show effects of
age and experience alone. What appears is that pay or wage rises steadily until
retirement or near it. Meanwhile human capital is present value of remaining
lifetime pay, and shrinks steadily as approaching retirement and mortality leaves
fewer future paydays to discount. Most students of human capital including Ben-

Porath reason that self-investment must end when time left for recovery in higher

Chapter 2: Fast Forward 1/06/16 13

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010953
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026433.txt,"hard cap) to invest into both transportation and social infrastructure projects in Europe. TIIC 2 will also seek
to invest, ona very selective basis, into greenfield social infrastructure projects in New Frontier Markets,
within close proximity to the European Union. Given its powerful network of relationships across Europe
and the operational skills of its team, TIIC Group will continue to target superior investment returns for TIIC
2’s portfolio of assets. These returns should be in line with the anticipated returns from the First Fund
portfolio which is forecast to deliver a gross IRR of up to 14% and a multiple of approximately 2x on
invested capital.

TIIC announced the first close of TIIC 2 on December 30"" 2016, with aggregate commitments of €135m
from a group of high quality and well-diversified limited partners. First close investors in TIIC 2 include the
European Investment Bank and Edmond de Rothschild, both with significant commitments, as well as the
TIIC team. TIIC 2 is also supported by a number of existing investors, together with several European
insurance companies, pension funds and family offices. A second close is planned in the coming months
and the final close will occur before the end of 2017. We have received significant interest from a number
of European institutional investors, many of which are in the process of completing detailed due diligence
on TIIC 2. We are firmly on track to achieve a final close of TIIC 2 before the end of the year.

Furthermore, TIIC has announced the first exit from Fund 1, with outstanding returns. Three other
investments are in sales processes and should close during the next few months.

BRIDGE

BRIDGE is an infrastructure debt platform initiated by Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management (EdRAM) to
enable institutional investors to access infrastructure assets with secured and stable revenue streams.
BRIDGE is a London based second generation debt fund sourcing and structuring transactions directly from
sponsors when feasible and one of the few independent debt teams only investing on behalf of clients. The
BRIDGE team has the ability to execute and deliver transactions as efficiently as traditional lenders as well as
negotiate terms and conditions bringing optimised yield and security to investors.

The BRIDGE platform was set up as a new leg of EDR’s Infrastructure, Real Assets & Structured Finance Team
striving to take advantage of the expertise of the infrastructure sector acquired when the team became a
global leader in PPP & Transport infrastructure financial advisory in 2011 and 2012.

The BRIDGE platform raised € 400m of new monies in 2016 and has successfully reached the €1bn mark of
Assets under Management at the end of 2016. The platform comprises three investment vehicles (French
FCT and Lux SIF) and is currently fundraising for additional pockets of liquidity:

o BRIDGE | reached final closing in December 2014 with approximately €600m of aggregate commitments from a club

of institutional investors.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026433
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013984.txt,"e » Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Brazilian Portuguese and Brazilian jujitsu

e » Berlin, Germany: German and locking (a form of upright break-
dancing)

I tend to focus on language acquisition and one kinesthetic skill, sometimes finding the latter after
landing overseas. The most successful serial vagabonds tend to blend the mental and the physical. Notice
that I often transport a skill I practice domestically —martial arts—to other countries where they are also
practiced. Instant social life and camaraderie. It need not be a competitive sport—it could be hiking,
chess, or almost anything that keeps your nose out of a textbook and you out of your apartment. Sports
just happen to be excellent for avoiding foreign-language stage fright and developing lasting friendships
while still sounding like Tarzan.

Language learning deserves special mention. It is, bar none, the best thing you can do to hone clear
thinking.

Quite aside from the fact that it is impossible to understand a culture without understanding its
language, acquiring a new language makes you aware of your own language: your own thoughts. The
benefits of becoming fluent in a foreign tongue are as underestimated as the difficulty is overestimated.
Thousands of theoretical linguists will disagree, but I know from research and personal experimentation
with more than a dozen languages that (1) adults can learn languages much faster than children®? when
constant 9-5 work is removed and that (2) it is possible to become conversationally fluent in any
language in six months or less. At four hours per day, six months can be whittled down to less than three
months. It is beyond the scope of this book to explain applied linguistics and the 80/20 of language
learning, but resources and complete how-to guides can be found under “language” at
www.fourhourblog.com. I learned six languages after failing Spanish in high school, and you can do the
same with the right tools.

Gain a language and you gain a second lens through which to question and understand the world.
Cursing at people when you go home is fun, too.

Don’t miss the chance to double your life experience.

Service for the Right Reasons: To Save the Whales, or Kill Them
and Feed the Children?

Morality is simply the attitude we adopt toward people we personally dislike.
— OSCAR WILDE

O,. would expect me to mention service in this chapter, and here it is. Like all before it, the twist is

a bit different. Service to me is simple: doing something that improves life besides your own. This is not
the same as philanthropy. Philanthropy is the altruistic concern for the well-being of mankind—human
life. Human life has long been focused on the exclusion of the environment and the rest of the food
chain, hence our current race to imminent extinction. Serves us right. The world does not exist solely for
the betterment and multiplication of mankind.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013984
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020190.txt,"38

were not authorized to receive them, the same charge for which Manning was convicted. Even if
it went no further, the FBI would satisfy its superiors in the Department of Justice that it had done
its law-enforcement job. But if it pursued the latter hypothesis, it would need to engage in a mole
hunt for a quarry that might not exist. By doing so, it could open a Pandora’s Box of suspicions
that it, or the NSA, might not ever be able to close. When the investigation came to this fork in
the road in the summer of 2013, according to a source on the House Intelligence Committee, it
chose the former route.

Finally, there was the question of whether Snowden had gone to Russia by design or accident.
Whenever an intelligence worker steals sensitive compartmentalized information of interest to a
foreign adversary and then defect to it, it raises at least the specter of state-sponsored espionage.
It is acommonly accepted presumption in counterintelligence that a spy, fearing arrest, flees to a
country that has some reason to offer him protection. When the British spies Guy Burgess,
Donald Maclean and Kim Philby, for example, fled to Moscow in the Cold War the presumption
was that they had a prior intelligence connection with Russia. And Philby confirmed it in his 1968
memoir “My Silent War.” So in the case of Snowden, counterintelligence had to consider the
possibility that his theft of state secrets and his arrival in Moscow might not be totally
coincidental.

For his part, Snowden said that he did not leave Hong Kong with the intention of staying in
Russia, but that the U.S. government “trapped him” at Moscow’s Airport by revoking his
passport. He told editor of The Nation magazine: “I’m in exile. My government revoked my
passport intentionally to leave me exiled.” He added that the U.S. government “chose to keep
me in Russia.” Although he repeated that assertion over a dozen times, it was untrue. The US
government had not invalidated his passport for travel back to the United States. When criminal
charges are lodged against a U.S, citizen by the Department of Justice, the State Department, in
accordance with the U.S. code of justice, marks in the electronic passport validation advisory
system that that person’s passport is electronically marked valid only for return to the U.S. After
criminal charges were filed against Snowden, including the theft of classified government
documents, it advised foreign governments that Snowden was wanted on felony charges, and
“should not be allowed to proceed in any further international travel, other than is necessary to
return him to the United States."" It was simply requiring that his passport, which is a State
Department document, be used for him to return to the United States. Rather than preventing
Snowden from returning to the United States, or “exiling” him, the government facilitated his
return home. With his passport, he could have flown home from either Hong Kong or Moscow,
where he, like any other person accused of a felony, would face the charges against him. Nor was
it plausible that President Obama and Secretary Of State Clinton would conspire to trap a
perpetrator carrying incredibly valuable national security secrets in Russia.

The counterintelligence investigation had little difficulty establishing that Snowden’s trapped”
version in the media was not consistent with the actual chronology of the events. Snowden
claimed that the U.S. State Department had acted while the plane was flying to Moscow on June

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020190
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019711.txt,"The Russians Are Coming | 223

1960, at the Hall of Journalists and invited all the foreign correspon-
dents in Moscow. Before television cameras, the defectors denounced
the NSA’s activities. Martin told how the NSA breached interna-
tional laws by spying on Germany, Britain, and other NATO allies.
Mitchell, for his part, suggested that the NSA’s practice of break-
ing international laws could ignite a nuclear war. Indeed, he justi-
fied their joint defection to Russia in heroic whistle-blowing terms,
saying, “We would attempt to crawl to the moon if we thought it
would lessen the threat of an atomic war.” The NSA review of the
case, however, assessed that little damage had been done, because the
NSA quickly changed the codes they had compromised. It noted,
“The Communist spymasters would undoubtedly have preferred
Martin and Mitchell to remain in place as moles, since their infor-
mation was dated as of the moment they left NSA.”

The next NSA defector was Victor Norris Hamilton, a translator
and analyst at the NSA. He arrived in Moscow in 1962, and like
Mitchell and Martin he claimed the status of a whistle-blower. This
time, the KGB provided a newspaper platform. Writing in the Rus-

© sian newspaper Izvestia, Hamilton revealed the extent of U.S. spying ©
on its allies in the Middle East.

None of these three 1960s defectors revealed what, if any, NSA
secret documents they had compromised. Nor did any of them ever
return to the United States. Martin changed his name to Vladimir
Sokolodsky, married a Russian woman, and died in Mexico City on
January 17, 1987. Mitchell vanished from sight and was reported to
have died in St. Petersburg on November 12, 2001. Hamilton, after
telling Russian authorities stories about hearing voices in his head
because of an NSA device implanted in his brain, was consigned to
Special Psychiatric Hospital No. 5 outside Moscow.

There were also KGB spies in the NSA who were caught or died
before they could defect. One of them was Sergeant Jack Dunlap.
He was found dead of carbon monoxide poisoning in his garage on
July 23, 1963. Although there was no suicide note, his death was
ruled an apparent suicide. NSA classified documents were later dis-
covered in his house. After that, NSA investigators unraveled his
decade-long career as a KGB mole. Dunlap had been recruited by the
KGB in Turkey in 1952. The standard KGB tool kit for recruitment

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r.indd 223 ® 9/30/16 8:13AM | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019711
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014033.txt,"+> BONUS MATERIAL

This book is not just what you hold in your hands. There was much more I wanted to include but

couldn’t due to space constraints. Use passwords hidden in this book to access some of the best I have to
offer. Here are just a few examples that took me years to assemble:

How to Get $250,000 of Advertising for $10,000
(includes real scripts)

How to Learn Any Language in 3 Months

Muse Math: Predicting the Revenue of Any Product
(includes case studies)

Licensing: From Tae Bo to Teddy Ruxpin

Real Licensing Agreement with Real Dollars
(this alone is worth $5,000)

Online Round-the-World (RTW) Trip Planner

For this and much more reader-only content, visit our companion site and free how-to message boards
at www.fourhourblog.com. How would you like a free trip around the world? Join us and see how simple
it is.

» ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Fin. I must thank the students whose feedback and questions birthed this book, and Ed Zschau,

tibermentor and entrepreneurial superhero, for giving me the chance to speak with them. Ed, in a world
where deferred dreams are the norm, you have been a shining light for those who dare to do it their way.
I bow down to your skills (and Karen Cindrich, the best right-hand woman ever) and look forward to
cleaning your erasers whenever the call comes—I’Il make a 220-pound bodybuilder of you yet!

Jack Canfield, you are an inspiration and have shown me that it is possible to make it huge and still be
a wonderful, kind human being. This book was just an idea until you breathed life into it. I cannot thank
you enough for your wisdom, support, and incredible friendship.

To Stephen Hanselman, prince among men and the best agent in the world, I thank you for “getting”
the book at first glance and taking me from writer to author. I cannot imagine a better partner or cooler
cat, and I look forward to many more adventures together. From negotiation to nonstop jazz, you amaze
me. LevelFiveMedia is the new breed of agenting, where first-time authors are developed into bestselling

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014033
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027364.txt,"Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No

GUID: 65BFD670-DC65-45AC-A8DC-E3DC5F8245CB

Message: I hope you are referring to them !

Sender:

Time: 07/29/18 06:54:30 PM (554608470)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 411317E8-B93D-47EE-A2C9-2D8ED7986673

Message: Yes!!!... we've got this

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027364
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021036.txt,"2

Focus on
Revenues

Drive Sustainable
Economic
Growth

a

bs www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 389

Improve Competitiveness

Without appropriate
government incentives in
Education / Technology /

Infrastructure / Employment,

USA Inc. may continue to
lose relative competitive
strength to other countries.

Kp
www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 390

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021036
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028057.txt,"recommended that Begin fire Sharon and Saguy. They left Raful in place, but
only because his term as chief-of-staff was due to end in a matter of weeks. Arik
at first refused to go, and Begin refused to fire him. Yet in the end, popular
pressure forced the issue. When another demonstration was called in protest at
Sharon’s continuing as Defense Minister, a right-wing political activist tossed a
grenade into the crowd, killing a young Peace Now member. Even Arik was
evidently shaken by the spectre of one of his presumed political admirers
murdering a fellow Israeli for peacefully protesting. Or at least shaken enough
to step down as Defense Minister. He did remain in the government as a
minister without portfolio. Still, Begin himself would quit as Prime Minister,
retiring into virtual seclusion, about half-a-year later.

Like the rest of the senior officers corps, I tried with difficulty to get on with
my own job. I imagined the contribution I could best make for now would be, as
Head of Planning, to ensure the mix of forces and weaponry deployed in any
future conflict were better suited to the task than in the Lebanon war. But I
didn’t believe that such technical failings or planning lapses, however serious a
contribution to the more than 650 Israeli lives lost, were what had mainly
caused the war to go wrong. The central mistake was what had bothered me all
along: the invasion was not a considered response to a particular security threat.
It was an overreaching exercise in geopolitics, with sleight-of-hand used to
evade the need to make and win support from government ministers and,
critically, the public. Even with questions still to be resolved about when and
how to withdraw the thousands of Israeli troops that were still inside Lebanon, I
remember wondering aloud to a few army friends, and to Nava as well, whether
we would look back in a decade’s time and see the war as “our Vietnam’. In
fact, Israeli troops would still be in south Lebanon nearly two decades later,
when I had left the military and was about to become Israeli Prime Minister.

Even as a two-star general in the kirva, | doubted I would be in a position to
help fix the deeper issues raised by the war. Any real influence would be in
positions like the chief-of-staff and his deputy; the head of operations; the head
of military intelligence. They were the core of the armed forces’ leadership and
had the most regular dealings with senior figures in government.

But I’d failed to factor in the effect of the inquiry recommendations. Within
days of the report, Israel had a new Defense Minister: Moshe Arens, who
returned from his post as ambassador in Washington. Among his first orders of
business was to act on the inquiry’s verdict on Raful and Yehoshua Saguy. As
chief of staff, Arens settled on a choice I suspect most senior officers saw as the

209
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028057
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015764.txt,"74 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?

problem. The human pretending to be a machine saw the joke, fixed my
problem and replied “Marmalade is served with butter and toast.” The
test worked!

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015764
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033413.txt,"The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033413
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017375.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

I responded, “If I wanted any of Mia’s former husbands to put the fear of God in Woody Allen,
I'd pick Sinatra over you Mr. Previn.” He laughed in agreement.

I have maintained a good relationship with Mia. Woody Allen eventually married Soon-Yi, and
they have adopted children. Their marriage seems to be working.

Both the Clinton-Lewinsky impeachment and Woody Allen-Mia Farrow cases involved sordid
accusation of improper sexual conduct by famous and powerful men. These kinds of accusation
directed against these kinds of men are grist for the media mill. Every legal and political move is
covered in detail. Everyone has an opinion. Litigating in such an environment is perilous. Every
mistake is magnified. You don’t learn how to manage such cases in law school. There are no
tule books. Experience is the only teacher.

After years of experience in dozens of high profile cases, I now try to teach my students how to
avoid, really minimize, inevitable mistakes. Here are some of my everchanging rules:

1. Never take a case just because the client is a celebrity or because the case is “high profile.”
Make sure the issues in the case are within your area of expertise.

2. Ifyou do take the case, don’t “hang out,” “chill” or socialize with the celebrity. (It is ok
to get an autograph for your kid, but that’s all.) Never assume the celebrity, or high
profile client, is your friend. You have an entirely professional relationship. Charge your
usual fee. No discount, no gauging.

3. Never say anything about the client or the case to anyone unless you are prepared to see it
in The New York Times or The National Enquirer.

4. Every time you meet the client, be prepared to be fired for telling him or her what they
don’t want to hear. Famous people often get bad medical treatment and bad legal service
for the same reason: the doctor and lawyer don’t want to offend or upset them and care
more about keeping the patient or client than telling them the painful truth.

5. Don’t pretend your celebrity or high profile case is just like an ordinary case. The media
is watching your every move, and every move should take into account the anticipated
media coverage. This doesn’t mean you should make or refrain from making the right
move because of the anticipated coverage, but rather you should consider (and perhaps
reject, but at least consider) what is the right move.

6. Remember that judges, jurors and prosecutors, their family members, their friends and

colleagues all watch television and read the papers. The media environment may have an
impact on their decisions.

7. Remember that high profile and celebrity cases tend to distort the legal system, because
the law treats famous people differently. Sometimes better. Sometimes worse. Never the
same. It has been said that hard cases make bad law. So, often, do high profile cases.

288

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017375
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023268.txt,"however - that is all in the past.
In order to move forward

I would ask that you realize that very unlike yours, My business is only comprised of my personal
attention and my personal time . Time that I was forced to grossly overspend on your various issues
last year. . As you are my very close friend I will not have you participate in a bidding process that I
have decided 1 will have this year for my time . (hopefully a more fair way to allocate ) I would also
ask that you keep in mind that though our deal expired months ago. (also keeping in mind , that your
understanding of the final payment terms neither reflected the emails or my memory, we finished it up
your way. ) I have answered every call Brad , joslin, Ada or you, have made . reviewed docs over and
over/ until once again, I was forced to insert myself strongly as I thought it dangerous not to. I made
serious dollar and time concessions last year.very serious I am wiling to continue to accommodate
some of your concerns , but I am, under no circumstances , none, willing to spend my time for free.
its not fair. After cleaning up Carlyn's mess , which was a few weeks and 30 million dollars . We
were both highly aware of the dire circumstances in which you found yourself last year, and in fact due
predominately to its seriousness. and those very circumstances I took extra care in our negotiations .
(you had claimed I had you over a barrel , ( a horrible position to be in with my very close friend.),
unfortunately I fear that if you are not cautious ,in the near future, another barrel will appear of your
own design )

I heard you when you said you believed 1 had already been paid for the work that is now required. The
art partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so.
. (FYI Carlyns art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title.) You will also recall
that you required that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .(
my work was never to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of
course should make clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past
agreement at all. I pointed this very fact out to you when I initially proposed a multi year agreement
right out of the box. you said you preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in
excess of even my own exalted opinion of my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my
limited amount of time-- way, way in excess of our agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in
the amount still outstanding from last year if that helps .. However, As my best student , and my only
one, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the required work yourself. I can put my
whiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,. share moments ideas etc.. I
am of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route . always . It will take a
great deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine .

We are scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning.

Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM

Subject:

To: Melanie Spinella - tsi—<“itsSCS
Leon,

Yesterday , I again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get
flavor) and you and 1 will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other
weeks spent doing the things that I don;t have the time to do.

In order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you,

might be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500
million dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023268
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018046.txt,"Norman Ambrose

Fashion Week Presentation. 9:00 am. Spring/summer 2011 collection. Invitation only. The Pierre Hotel. New
York. info@normanambrose.com.

Event address: 2 East 61st St., New York. Event web address: normanambrose.com.

Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

Yuna Yang

Fashion Week Presentation. 9:30am. Spring/summer 2011 collection. Invitation only. Hudson Hotel. New York. press@yunayang.com.

Event address: 356 West 58th St., New York. Event web address: yunayang.com.
Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

Mercedes Benz Fashion Week
Lacoste Show. 10:00am. Spring 2011 collection. Invitation only. Lincoln Center Plaza. New York.

Event address: West 65th St. and Broadway, New York. Event web address:www.wiseandcomp.com/lacoste.

Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

Showtime Networks

Third Annual Showtime House Opening Day. 10:00 am. (Continues through October 27.) Featuring rooms inspired by Dexter, Nurse Jackie,
Weeds, United States of Tara, The Big C, The Borgias, and Californication. Tickets from $15.00. Cassa Hotel and Residences. New
York. Contact: Johanna Fuentes. johanna.fuentes@showtime.net. (212) 708-1590.

Event address: 70 West 45th Street, New York. Sponsored by CNET,Lonny Magazine,The New Yorker,Wired Magazine. Event web
address: www.sho.com/showtimehouse.

Tags: Designer Showcase Festival Tour Industry Design Industry TV Social Patron.

Mercedes Benz Fashion Week

Cynthia Rowley Show. 11:00am. Spring 2011 collection. Invitation only. Lincoln Center Plaza. New York. Contact: Michelle
Finocchi. finocchi@cynthiarowley.com. (212) 242-0847.

Event address: West 65th St. and Broadway, New York. Event web address:www.cynthiarowley.com.

Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

September Concert Foundation

Various Performances. 11:00am. Tribute concerts around the city. Various venues. New York.

Event address: , New York. Event web address: www.septemberconcert.org.

Tags: Benefit Performance Concert Children Family Industry Music Social Patron Civic.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018046
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027370.txt,"Is Invitation: No

GUID: F3BC9062-3570-473D-87BF-12EA14A9AC92

Message: The cricket player?-- how could he be worse that the Islamist ?
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 07/31/18 04:14:14 AM (554728454)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No
Is Invitation:
GUID: B52028CC

Message: makes

many nuclear weapons.
one daughter of jimmy goldsmith.
wacko

mine.
to convert.

No

7514-4513-8975-5B823560F831

donald look like einstein. incapable of truth. , devout islamisist
( not erdogan or khomeni). he was married to two friends of
super wealthy take over guy. forced her

Sender: e:]j
Time: 07/31/18
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation:

GUID: 14FA760E

r,

Message:
captain.

itunes@gmail.com

04:15:37 AM (554728537)

No

29A6-46B4-A4D3-916809764B12

it follow your prediction around cults of personality
not a chess player ,

he is a cricket
but he's good at rousing the crowd

Sender: e:]
Time: 07/31/18
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

itunes@gmail.com

04:56:53 AM (554731013)

Is Invitation: No

GUID: FF6D5FDA-EC23-4D15-881A-55DC645C3246

Message: any questions for pritzker , he will be here from 2 to 330 if you would like
to ask yourself. can we use csis for anything ? tom has GREAT relations in
china.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 07/31/18 05:50:28 AM (554734228)

Flags: 1150981

Ts Read: No
Is Invitation:
GUID: DOB9I1F78

Message:

No

https:

EF75-4786-B648-E4E0D082D036

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuaMR8d4xJo

Sender: e:]
Time: 07/31/18

Flags: 1085445

itunes@gmail.com

05:50:28 AM (554734228)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027370
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032719.txt,"From: Weingarten, Re icy

Sent: 1/15/2018 3:05:52 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: RE:

Importance: — High
And...2??? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM

To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject:

megann and memasters tried to resign

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032719
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028043.txt,"I could see that Little Pines was a kind of fiction. All you had to do was take
a map and draw in the 40-kilometer line. In the areas nearer the Mediterranean,
in the western and central parts of the border area, it indeed covered territory
controlled by armed PLO groups. But in the eastern sector, there were Syrian
positions a mere 10 to 12 kilometers up from the border, well inside the
“security zone”. Not much further north were two full Syrian divisions. That
meant we’d be fighting not just the Palestinians, which was the ostensible aim
of Little Pines. We would have to take on Syria. As soon as those hostilities
began, we would have to destroy radar and SAM sites in the Syrian-controlled
Beka’a Valley further north into Lebanon. After the first costly days of the 1973
war in the Sinai, we were not about to enter a major conflict without ensuring
air superiority. Unless the Syrians retreated or surrendered, the inevitable result
would be a wider conflict, not limited to dealing with Palestinian fighters in
south Lebanon but paving the way for Arik to go ahead with his original plan
and push all the way to Beirut.

This wasn’t mere supposition on my part. In February 1982, we ran a
simulation exercise in the kirya based on Plan B. The result: Little Pines became
Big Pines. A clash with the Syrians proved inevitable, if only because one target
even under Little Pines was the main road between Beirut and Damascus. It lay
well beyond the 40-kilometer line. As the main supply route for their forces in
the interior of Lebanon, it was also of critical importance for the Syrians. So any
idea of a quick, limited strike to establish a security zone was fantasy. A few
days later, Raful chaired a wide-ranging discussion on Lebanon. Near the end of
the session, I asked him directly whether government ministers were aware that
our war plan “will inevitably lead to a clash with the Syrians”. Raful hesitated
for a second, but then answered briskly: “Yes.”

That assurance would turn out to be untrue. But my wider concern, as the
weeks passed, was Arik’s political plan, of which I was getting an ever clearer
idea from him. It struck me as not just grand, but grandiose. Part of it was to
obliterate Arafat as a political force, if not by killing him then by forcing him
and every one of his fighters from Lebanon, a country Arik wanted to place
under the unchallenged control of the most prominent of the younger generation
of Christian Phalangist politicians, Bashir Gemayel. I felt all that would be
challenging enough. But in Arik’s eyes, this was only part of a complete
reordering of our conflict with the Arabs. He expected Gemayel’s Lebanon to
openly align itself with Israel and expel all Syrian troops. As for the expelled
Palestinians, they would go back to Jordan where they would resume — and, this
time, win — their civil war with King Hussein. The result, with Hussein deposed,

195
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028043
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021022.txt,"USA Consumers =

Biggest Demand Driver For GDP Growth, Until 2007

Personal Consumption’s Contribution to Real GDP Growth, 1950 - 2009

= 4%
=
£
(0)
= 2% ~~
>
a
a
(0)
rt 0%
wo
a
ay, m@ Real GDP Y/Y Growth
71) a re
Personal Consumption Expenditure’s Contribution to Real GDP Growth
BAY So — cen ee ae os a a eee eS = RE a Se = eR eS SO = a
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
KP Source: BEA.
(@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 361

Beginning in 2007, Wealth Destruction + High Unemployment Forced Consumers

to Save Again, Potentially Reducing Short-Term Demand for Goods & Services

3% average annual GDP growth (1981 - 2007) was helped as the average USA consumer:
1) Increased personal consumption as percent of GDP to 71% from 62%;

2) Decreased personal savings rate to 2% of disposable income from 11%;

Beginning in 2007, things changed as:

1) The average US consumer experienced a material decline in the value of his / her largest
investment assets (real estate and equities) from 2007 to 2009 when peak-to-trough
valuations for USA residential real estate declined 30% and the S&P 500 declined 56%;

2) Unemployment rose to 10% in 2009 / 2010 from 30-year trough of 4% in 1999, creating
uncertainty regarding future personal income levels;

3) Personal savings rate increased to 6% in 2009 / 2010 of disposable income from 2% in 2007,
as uncertainty grows and appetite for consumption ebbs;

All in, the key driver of US GDP growth — the US consumer’s ability to spend — is severely
constrained in the short term as he / she aims to rebuild savings and contain
spending. This raises the question — ‘How fast can US GDP grow annually over the
next ten years?’ Determining ways to drive GDP (and related job growth) is crucial...

Source: Residential real estate decline based on CQ1:07 to CQ1:09 changes in S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index. GDP

KP growth & composition / personal savings rate per BEA. Unemployment rate per BLS.
www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 362

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021022
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033407.txt,"have laid out - this is whati want. . but actually , how it would work , and what her freedoms are. could
be . yours.. are essential to the plan. I think much of this is your uncertainty and not hers. sorry. and
yours is infectious

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM Larry Summers wrote:

Ok. Best to make reversible errors
I’ve written note for exit strategy 1. Not going to send for few days.

Going to treat it all as a game till I maybe see her in Beijing and out of character ignore and look past her
bad behavior.

Best to stop obsessing.

Sent from my iPad

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at:

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Mar 17, 2019, at 8:42 AM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

com

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033407
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015770.txt,"80 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?

war. It was assumed this inevitable progression deterred the aggression
in the first place, and the threat of mutually assured destruction kept the
world peaceful. Giving up this tenet of defense strategy was something
the American military just could not contemplate. Many people did not
think it a rational defense strategy; it seemed appropriate the acronym
for mutually assured destruction is MAD, but this was the status quo.

We now know our worry over Russian superiority was groundless.
The West’s technological advantage, founded on the invention of
computing and sophisticated materials technology, gave us a huge
advantage. In the only battle to be fought in the 20"" century between
Russian and Western tanks, during the first Iraq war, most of the Russian
tanks were destroyed with no losses to American tanks. We know this
now, but we are talking of a time when paranoia over the Soviet advantage
was the common view.

There is speculation that Reagan had muddled intercontinental
ballistic missiles with all nuclear weapons. I do not think this is true.
Reagan was a man of vision, quite comfortable with using his folksy way
to convey sincere belief, and I think abolishing all nuclear weapons was
in his mind. It would have been a breathtaking moment.

In the end a rather feeble communiqué was put together and the
talks declared a technical failure. But, both leaders had seen eye-to-eye;
both were prepared to make major concessions and both wanted an end
to the old strategy of mutually assured destruction. Wiping each other
out was no longer considered a successful outcome! The meeting, and

H6féi House in Reykjavik

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015770
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031800.txt,"From: J [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 12/22/2018 1:04:05 PM 
To: Larry Summers 
Subject: Re: 
this is not a new phenomenon for him. in the past he was told not to come out of his apt. thats how he got 
through near personal bankruptcy. is strength is remarkable. he is pounded 24/7. I hope someone close to 
him gets indicted , but not sure, otherwise the pressure of the unkown will force him to do crazy things. 
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:54 AM Larry Summers_____________________________wrote: 
Of course. Who knows whether I'm serious? Not at this moment me. 
Will trump crack into insanity? 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Dec 22, 2018, at 7:18 AM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
trump - borderline insane. dersh, a few feet further from the border but not by much 
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:03 AM Larry Summer 
Sent 45 minutes after she sent an outline. 
wrote: 
I had sent a comment in mtg w her father flattering her father and saying other China officials had flattered 
him as well. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Keyu Jin 
Date: December 22, 2018 at 12:49:20 AM EST 
To: Larry Summers 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031800 
I also wanted to say how grateful I am and have been for your support, and also your support of my father's 
work. I don't say these things often enough but it is I hope implied. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031801 
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017361.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

presence of his own lawyers. In reaching this agreement, the President withdrew his constitutional
challenge to the power of a grand jury to compel his testimony. This was a serious constitutional
issue, especially since Starr had given Lewinsky total immunity from prosecution. This left
Clinton as the primary target of the grand jury. But there is grave doubt whether a sitting
President can be indicted or prosecuted. If he cannot, then there is even graver doubt whether it is
proper to use a grand jury to gather information for an impeachment. In my view, the President
could have leveled a serious challenge, on this and other grounds, against the grand jury
subpoena. Such a challenge would have taken at least a year to resolve. In the meantime, he
would not have had to testify.

But the President decided to waive this challenge and to testify “voluntarily.” What I don’t know
is whether at the time the President made the decision to testify he knew of the existence of the
semen-stained dress. There had, of course, been rumors of such a dress over the prior months, but
they had been denied by Lewinsky’s lawyer. The news of the uncleaned dress with a telltale stain
became public only after the President made his decision to testify. It is fair to ask whether the
President’s decision would have been different if he knew about the existence of the dress. It is
also fair to ask whether the President’s testimony in front of the grand jury would have been
different had there been no dress. We don’t know.

What we do know is that the President’s decision to testify before the Starr grand jury gave the
prosecutor an opportunity to trap the President once again into committing perjury — this time not
in a live deposition in a dismissed case where the testimony was only marginally relevant, but in a
grand jury proceeding where the testimony was central.

It also gave the prosecutor an unprecedented opportunity to videotape the interrogation so that it
could be seen by Congress and the public.

Again short term considerations prevailed. First, the President’s political advisors urged him to
avoid that day’s image of the President walking into the courthouse — the so-called “perp walk.”
The White House agreed therefore, to the making of a videotape which would later show the
President being evasive and perhaps even dishonest. Although the President’s videotaped
testimony was not as bad as many thought it would be — at least in the short run -- it was more
damaging in the long run than a walk to the courtroom might have been.

Ultimately, after the disclosure of the semen-stained dress made it undeniable that there had been
sexual activity between them, President Clinton had to appear on television and acknowledge that
he had behaved “inappropriately” with Monica Lewinsky. It was a low point both in his
presidency and in his personal life.

The day after President Clinton publicly acknowledged that he had behaved “inappropriately”, he
flew to the Vineyard. The next day, we were both at a party. The President gathered a small
group—including several lawyers—around him and began to discuss the case. He said that
following the unanimous Supreme Court decision refusing to postpone the lawsuit brought
against him by Paula Jones, he had no choice but to submit to a deposition about his sex life,
because Jones refused to settle the case. I told him he did have an alternative: he could have
ended the law suit by simply defaulting and paying Paula Jones’ damages. If he paid the damages

274

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017361
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018052.txt,"Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

VPL by Victoria Bartlett

Fashion Week Show. 11:00am. Spring 2011 collection. Invitation only. Pier 59 Studios, Art and Fashion Group. New
York. vpl@companyagenda.com.

Event address: Pier 59, at Chelsea Piers, New York.
Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

Broadway League

Broadway on Broadway 2010. 11:30am. Concert. Times Square-43rd and 7th Avenue. New York.
Event address: 43rd Street and 7th Avenue, New York. Sponsored by Continental Airlines,Hue Leggings,New York Times. Event web

address: www.ilovenytheater.com.

Tags: Benefit Performance Concert Industry Music Industry Theater Performing Arts Supporter Social Patron Arts Performing Arts.

Preen by Thornton Bregazzi

Fashion Week Show. 11:30am. Spring 2011 collection. Invitation only. Milk Gallery-Studios. New York. preen@bpcm.com.

Event address: 450 West 15th St., New York.
Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

DKNY

Fashion Week Show. 1:00pm. Spring 2011 collection. Invitation only. Stephan Weiss Studio. New York. guestrequests@dkintl.com.

Event address: 711 greenwich st, New York. Event web address: dkny.com.
Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media.

Marlon Gobel

Fashion Week Presentation. 1:30pm. Spring 2011 men's collection. Invitation only. Four Seasons Restaurant. New
York. marlongobal@gmail.com.

Event address: 99 East 52nd St., New York. Event web address: www.marlongobel.com.

Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

Elise Overland

Fashion Week Show. 2:00pm. Spring/summer 2011 collection. Invitation only. Exit Art. New York. rsvp@maguiresteele.com.

Event address: 475 10th Ave., New York.
Tags: Fashion Event Fashion Show Exclusive Mix Industry Beauty Industry Fashion Industry Media Industry Retail.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018052
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026427.txt,"and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

ef

Animations GRATUITES pour vos emails “Cliquez ici!

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026427
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013990.txt,"»- AN E-MAIL YOU NEED TO READ

There is nothing the busy man is less busied with than living; there is nothing harder to learn.

— SENECA

For the past 33 years, I have looked in the mirror every moming and asked myself: “If today
were the last day of my life, would I want to do what I am about to do today?” And whenever
the answer has been “No” for too many days in a row, I know I need to change something ...
almost everything—all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure —
these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important.
Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you
have something to lose.

—STEVE JOBS, college dropout and CEO of Apple Computer, Stanford University

Commencement, 200585

L you’re confused about life, you’re not alone. There are almost seven billion of us. This isn’t a

problem, of course, once you realize that life is neither a problem to be solved nor a game to be won.

If you are too intent on making the pieces of a nonexistent puzzle fit, you miss out on all the real fun.
The heaviness of success-chasing can be replaced with a serendipitous lightness when you recognize that
the only rules and limits are those we set for ourselves.

So be bold and don’t worry about what people think. They don’t do it that often anyway.

Two years ago, I was forwarded the following poem—originally written by child psychologist David
L. Weatherford—by a close friend. He quit his own deferred-life plan after reading it, and I hope you
will do the same. Here it is.

SLOW DANCE

Have you ever watched kids
On a merry-go-round?

Or listened to the rain
Slapping on the ground?

Ever followed a butterfly’s erratic flight?
Or gazed at the sun into the fading night?

You better slow down.
Don’t dance so fast.

Time is short.
The music won’t last.

Do you run through each day
On the fly?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013990
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020184.txt,"32

CHAPTER TWO

The Crime Scene Investigation

“Any private contractor, not even an employee of the government, could walk into the NSA building, take
whatever they wanted, and walk out with it and they would never know.”

Edward Snowden, Moscow 2014

About 15 miles northwest of Honolulu on the island of Oahu in Hawaii, adjacent to the
sprawling Wheeler Air Force Base, is a 250,000 square foot man-made mound of earth and
reinforced concrete surrounded by an electrified fence. Inside the mound is a three story structure
originally built by the Air Force in the Second World War as a bomb-proof aircraft repair facility.
In the Cold War, it was modernized to withstand an enemy chemical, biological, radiological or
Electrical Magnetic Pulse attacks, and used by the Navy’s operation center for its Pacific fleet.
After the Cold War ended, the huge edifice was turned over to the NSA, which had been created
as an intelligence service to intercept the communications and signals of foreign countries after
World War II, a mission which included vacuuming into its giant computer arrays telephone
messages, missile telemetry, submarine signals and virtually everything on the electro-magnetic
spectrum of interest to the US defense department and US intelligence agencies. Because it
provided a valuable window on the activities of adversary nations in the Pacific region, it was able
to monitor the ballistic missile tests and submarine activities of China, North Korea and Russia.
As the NSA developed it, this Hawatian base became one of its primary regional bases for
gathering Asian communications intelligence. By 2013, the Kunia base, also called “the tunnel”
by its NSA workers, had a vast array of state-of-the-art technology, including 90 Cray
supercomputers arranged in a horseshoe configuration, used to decipher and make sense of the
intercepted signals from China, Russia and North Korea. At the heart of the Hawaiian complex
was a unit with both military and civilian employees. A large share of the civilians who ran the
computers worked under two-year contract to the NSA’s leading civilian contractor, Booz Allen
Hamilton.

Keith Alexander, the four-star general who headed the NSA from 2005 to 2014, first learned
about the impending story in the Guardian on June 4, 2013 while he was in Germany meeting
with its top intelligence officials. Janine Gibson, the Guardian’s American website editor had
notified the NSA it intended to break a story based on NSA the next day. It took NSA
counterintelligence less than 48 hours to determine that a civilian employee at the base from
which documents were stolen had not reported back to work on June 3rd, 2013. It also
determined he had lied on his application of a two-week medical leave and had flown to Hong
Kong. The missing man was Edward Joseph Snowden, a 29-year civilian employee of Booz Allen
Hamilton. At the time of the theft in May 2013, he was still being trained as an analyst at the
Threat Operations Center. Personnel records further showed that he had worked there for less

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020184
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016279.txt,"potentials, which limits their spacing to a few 10s per second. It is probably
no accident that the “frame rate,” at which we can distinguish that movies are
actually a sequence of stills, is about 40 per second. Thus, electronic
processing is close to a billion times faster.

e Size: The linear dimension of a typical neuron is about 10 microns.
Molecular dimensions, which set a practical limit, are about 10,000 times
smaller, and artificial processing units are approaching that scale. Smallness
makes communication more efficient.

e Stability: Whereas human memory 1s essentially continuous (analog),
artificial memory can incorporate discrete (digital) features. Whereas analog
quantities can erode, digital quantities can be stored, refreshed, and
maintained with complete accuracy.

e Duty Cycle: Human brains grow tired with effort. They need time off to take
nourishment and to sleep. They carry the burden of aging. Most profoundly:
They die.

e Modularity (open architecture): Because artificial information processors can
support precisely defined digital interfaces, they can readily assimilate new
modules. Thus, if we want a computer to “see” ultraviolet or infrared or
“hear” ultrasound, we can feed the output from an appropriate sensor directly
into its “nervous system.” The architecture of brains is much more closed and
opaque, and the human immune system actively resists implants.

e Quantum readiness: One case of modularity deserves special mention,
because of its long-term potential. Recently physicists and information
scientists have come to appreciate that the principles of quantum mechanics
support new computing principles, which can empower qualitatively new
forms of information processing and (plausibly) new levels of intelligence.
But these possibilities rely on aspects of quantum behavior which are quite
delicate and seem especially unsuitable for interfacing with the warm, wet,
messy enviroment of human brains.

Evidently, as platforms for intelligence, human brains are far from optimal. Still,
although versatile housekeeping robots or mechanical soldiers would find ready, lucrative
markets, at present there is no machine that approaches the kind of general-purpose
human intelligence those applications would require. Despite their relative weakness on
many fronts, human brains have some big advantages over their artificial competitors.
Let me mention five:

e Three-dimensionality: Although, as noted, the linear dimensions of existing
artificial processing units are vastly smaller than those of brains, the procedure by
which they’re made—centered on lithography (basically, etching)—is essentially
two-dimensional. That is revealed visibly in the geometry of computer boards
and chips. Of course, one can stack boards, but the spacing between layers is
much larger, and communication much less efficient, than within layers. Brains
make better use of all three dimensions.

e Self-repair: Human brains can recover from, or work around, many kinds of
injuries or errors. Computers often must be repaired or rebooted externally.

59

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016279
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748.txt,"idealized systems, topological entropy has been proven be equivalent to the product

of an index of expansion and the dimension of the support such that an increase in
expansiveness , 4(+), is compensated by a decrease in Do leaving hr invariant

(Manning,1981). This relationship has also been found in the behavior of some
nonuniformly expansive neuroendocrine, neuronal and human behavioral systems
(Mandell and Selz, 1995; Smotherman et al, 1996; Mandell and Selz, 1997a;).

Is Randomness Versus Determinism a Productive Question for the Biological

Sciences? Are There Better Ones?

Measures made on realistically nonuniformly expansive behavior of
dynamical systems emerging from nonlinear differential equations and that arising
from a variety of non-classical random walk models overlap such that making what
may be more a metaphysical discrimination at this point is labor intensive,
contentious and unproductive for generating new experimental work in the
neurosciences. It is important to note that random walk theory and computation has
matured to such an extent that almost any “nonlinear dynamical behavior” can, with
respect to statistical measure, be modeled using one of many varieties. For
examples, power law distributions in continuous time random walks (times of
movement are also randomly chosen) , random walks with traps (temporarily
immobilizing the trajectory like unstable fixed points), random walks in random
environments, time of passage of ants in a labyrinth and Levy leaps and local
diffusive exploration (looking for a wallet) among many others can represent much
of the irregular behavior we observe in the brain (Shlesinger et al, 1982; Montroll
and Shlesinger, 1984; Hughes, 1995; Klafter et al, 1996). On the other hand,
(Markoff) partition of the sequence and a probabilistic style of analysis of nonlinear
dynamical systems has been a major strategy for description and quantification
from the field’s beginnings (Parry, 1964; Adler and Weiss, 1967; Bowen, 1970;
Lasota and Yorke, 1973). The issue of randomness versus determinism remains

current although many if not most properties of deterministic dynamical systems can

248

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013748
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019705.txt,"The NSA‘s Back Door | 217

through the back door of outside contractors were not fully vetted.
(On August 20, 2015, USIS agreed to forfeit $30 million in fees to
settle the lawsuit.)

USIS was also open to sophisticated hacking attacks by outsid-
ers. In August 2014, the Department of Homeland Security’s coun-
terintelligence unit discovered such a massive and persistent breach
in USIS that it shut down its entire exchange of data with it. The
intrusion into USIS records in this case was attributed to hackers in
China most likely linked to the Chinese intelligence service. Such
massive intrusions dated back to 2011. USIS’s lack of security in its
website left a gaping hole through which outside parties, including
Chinese and Russian hackers, could learn both the identity and the
background information of specialists applying for jobs at the NSA.

These private companies also did not sufficiently protect the per-
sonal data of their independent contractors working at the NSA.
The hackers’ group Anonymous took credit for the successful 2011
attack on the Booz Allen Hamilton servers. It also cracked the algo-
rithms used to protect employees. It next injected so-called Trojan

© horse viruses and other malicious codes into Booz Allen servers ©
that allowed it future entry. If amateur hackers such as Anonymous
could break into the computers of the NSA’s largest contractor, so
could adversaries’ state espionage services with far more advanced
hacking tools. From these sites, China or Russia could obtain all the
job applications and personal résumés submitted to contractors such
as Booz Allen. It could then compile a list of the best candidates to
do its bidding.

These deficiencies in the private sector were compounded by
the failure of security in the government’s own Office of Person-
nel Management. It used a computer system called e-QIP in which
intelligence employees, including outside contractors, updated their
computerized records to maintain or upgrade their security clear-
ances. For example, Snowden updated his clearance in 2011. To do
so, these employees constantly updated their financial and personal
information. As it turned out, there was a major hole in the e-QIP
system. It has repeatedly been hacked by unknown parties since
2010. In 2015, the U.S. government told Congress that China was
most likely responsible, but Russia and other nations with sophis-

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r.indd 217 ® 9/30/16 8:13AM | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019705
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014027.txt,"and family, but sometimes you have to ignore the advice of your loved ones to really make some thing
happen. If you believe the impossible can be made possible, it will happen. —A.K. BROOKMIRE

KILLING YOUR BLACKBERRY

I’m a 37-year-old Subway franchisee owning and operating 13 stores. Been doing this for seven years.
Prior to reading 4HWW I was KING at W4W (translate: work for work’s sake)! I'd never given myself
“permission” to behave differently than I did as an employee in the past. 4HWW was absolutely
liberating for me. I literally “caught myself’ and began the process of curing my addiction to W4W. I
used to always be “on” and I was never really “present” anywhere—too busy doing the “blackberry
prayer” at the dinner table instead of spending quality time with those who were present. Holidays were
just a remote office for battling the e-mail tsunami. 4HWW gave me a new paradigm and I began to
look at my business as a “product,” the (original) purpose of which was to provide me witha
disproportionate amount of income vs. time invested personally by me—to what end? To ENJOY
MYSELF and to have complete autonomy over my schedule and activities. So I got off my own back,
told myself it was OK to pursue the original purpose and here’s what I did:

Crunched my “always open” workweek into four days and 20 hours. I immediately began taking
Mondays OFF, giving me a nice three-day weekend. (Fridays are in the “CROSSHAIRS” next!) Tuesday
to Friday I work 11 A.M.-4 p.m. (20 hours per week). With the “unluxury” of time in this crunched
workweek I was forced to appraise everything through the 80/20 filter and found that 50% of the 80%
was pure crap and the other 50% of the 80% could be done by someone on my payroll. Great!

Everything I do now has to somehow either increase sales or decrease costs otherwise “it’s someone
else’s job.” You can’t be “half-pregnant,” so when I’m “on” [I’m really on and when I’m “off” ?'m off—
good luck trying to contact me. I still carry portable e-mail but I’ve killed “auto-sync” (the bane of
modern mankind in terms of interruption) now it’s on a Tues-Fri, 11 A.M.-4 p.m. schedule. Outside of
that window it waits.

My e-mail autoresponder eliminated 50% of my e-mail within two weeks as people sending me
meaningless crap got fed up looking at my autoresponder and stopped including me—love it! I keep a
short, compact “to-do” list and anything time-bound is in my calendar. These get my attention before
any other “inbox” does because I’ve previously decided what’s important for me to get done—the rest
can wait.

I could go on, but all in all I think this is a message that the self-employed need to hear so badly. With
no “boss” and no “clean edges” to work-life/home-life it’s so easy to fall into a W4W grind and your
business becomes a tractor beam that trails you inexorably down that path. 4HWW is the antidote!” —
ANDREW, self-employed in the UK

STAR WARS , ANYONE?

I knew my quest for the 4-Hour Workweek was working when my daughter’s kindergarten teacher
asked her the question: “What kind of work does your father do?” As the teacher re-told the story back
to me, it was my daughter’s answer that really struck a chord. “Your daughter turned and looked up at
me with the most serious look on her face and said, ‘My dad just sits around and watches Star Wars all
day.’”

It’s funny how this one simple question, and not to mention my daughter’s answer, would be the
moment of true 4HWW self-awareness for me. You see the answer my daughter gave her teacher has a
deeper meaning. I believe what she meant to say, if she could articulate it, was “My dad sort of does
whatever he wants to do.”

I read the 4HWW almost two years ago when I was on vacation at the beach with my family. I
remember it well, because I kept reading parts of the book to my wife, bothering her to no end. ama

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014027
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031460.txt,"From: Ed 
Sent: 12/19/2015 2:36:13 AM 
To: Epstein, Jeff [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: My review today in wsj of conspiracy theories 
Importance: High 
They're Not Really Out to Get You 
By EDWARD JAY EPSTEIN 
Dec. 18, 2015, Wall Street Journal 
1 
Conspiracy, a word derived from the Latin ""to breathe together,"" has been a salient part of the darker 
side of recorded history ever since some 60 conspirators in the Roman senate, including Brutus and 
Cassius, plotted together to assassinate Julius Caesar in 44 B.C. Nowadays the ""C"" word does not always 
sit well with journalists, who commonly employ it in conjunction with ""theory"" to describe paranoid 
distortions of reality. 
Even so, a criminal conspiracy is not a rare phenomenon. Not only was a foreign conspiracy responsible 
for the monstrous 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center (as well as the previous attempt to blow it up in 
1993) but, according to the Center on Law and Security at Fordham University, over 90% of routine federal 
indictments for terrorist attacks since 9/11 contain at least one conspiracy charge. The government's 
pursuit of conspiracies is by no means limited to terrorism. Conspiracy charges are the rule rather than 
the exception in cases brought against businessmen accused of fixing prices, evading environmental 
regulations, using insider information or laundering money. 
But there are also pseudo-conspiracies that exist only in a delusionary or misinformed mind. And some of 
them achieve a huge following. In Pakistan, according to public opinion polls, a majority of the 
population believes that the 9/11 attack was staged by President George W. Bush to launch a war on Islam. 
The claim that the 1969 moon landing was faked is still around. Just two days ago a crew from a Russian 
TV channel rushed to my apartment to interview me about a viral post on YouTube in which the deceased 
director Stanley Kubrick supposedly made a deathbed confession to having filmed the landing in a 
Hollywood studio—even though everything about the post, including a fake Kubrick, was untrue. 
Why people believe in pseudo-conspiracies is the focus of Rob Brotherton's fascinating book ""Suspicious 
Minds."" Mr. Brotherton, an academic psychologist, advances the thesis that the belief in pseudo-
conspiracies proceeds from the ""quirks and foibles"" in the way that the human brain, or at least some 
human brains, process evidence. He lucidly reviews studies showing common defects in the brain's wiring, 
such as the bias that selects evidence to confirm rather than undermine a pre-adopted thesis. ""We seek 
what we expect to find,"" as Mr. Brotherton puts it. Relatedly, ""biased assimilation"" causes us to 
""interpret ambiguous events in light of what we already believe."" 
Discussing Richard Hofstadter's 1964 essay ""The Paranoid Style in American Politics,"" Mr. Brotherton 
accepts Hofstadter's characterization of proponents of politically motivated conspiracy theories as 
""paranoid"" and suffering from ""a psychic phenomenon"" that prevents them from seeing the absurdity of 
their position. But he disagrees with Hofstadter that this condition affects only a small number of 
people on the fringes of society. For Mr. Brotherton, ""conspiracy theories thrive in the mainstream."" 
Until the controversy over the validity of Warren Commission's 1966 report on the Kennedy assassination, 
the phrase ""conspiracy theory"" had a more neutral meaning, suggesting a plausible yet unproven claim 
about multiple actors in a single event. Only in the aftermath of the Warren Commission did it become a 
derogatory term used to suggest theories that subvert conventional wisdom. To those who doubted the 
commission's finding that a single gunman killed Kennedy, Earl Warren became, Mr. Brotherton's says, the 
""figurehead in a vast cover-up."" 
It is not easy to find an objective criterion that distinguishes the inquiry into a real conspiracy from 
one that chases a pseudo-conspiracy. Both types rely are the eyewitnesses, documents and forensic 
evidence. The best that Mr. Brotherton can offer on this score is to cite Stewart Potter's famous comment 
on pornography: ""I know it when I see it."" In the context of suspicious minds, though, one person might 
see a plausible case for a conspiracy and another only outlandish connections. The distinction is in the 
mind of the beholder. 
Mr. Brotherton offers a sample list of conspiracy theories, including ones alleging that Abraham Lincoln 
was assassinated on the orders of his vice president; that the moon landing was faked; that Area 51 in 
New Mexico is home to extra-terrestrial technology under government auspices; that President Obama is ""a 
communist Muslim from Kenya."" Such theories are meant to show that suspicious minds leap to absurd 
conclusions. These are chosen because there is no evidence to support them. 
The picture changes, however, if we consider, for example, the theory claiming that Lincoln's assassin, 
John Wilkes Booth was part of a larger conspiracy backed by the Confederacy. On April 14, 1865, at about 
the same time that Booth shot Lincoln, one of his associates stabbed Secretary of State William Seward 
and another stalked Vice President Andrew Johnson with a loaded gun. The military commission appointed by 
President Johnson, after hearing 371 witnesses testify and after examining Confederate bank transfers and 
cipher communications, concluded that the three attacks were part of a conspiracy sponsored by the 
Confederacy and convicted eight of Booth's associates, four of whom were hanged. Here we have a 
conspiracy theory proceeding not from crackpots but from a government commission backed by the new 
president and most members of Lincoln's cabinet. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031460 
Clearly the defects in the brain's wiring that lead to crazy theories may lead to the confirmation of 
theories that are adopted by rational people. Indeed, the confirmation bias can work in contradictory 
ways: confirming not only conspiracy theories but the impulse to reject them in favor of conventional 
wisdom. Can this defect be corrected? Here I am reminded of a woody Allen's absolutely brilliant 1996 
comedy ""Everyone says 1 Love You,"" in which the once-liberal son of a New York liberal family starts 
spouting conservative theories until a doctor solves the problem by restoring the proper flow of oxygen 
to his brain. The movie has a happy ending when the son goes back to spouting his family's liberal 
theories. While Mr. Brotherton offers no such remedy to our brain's defects, he does offer a thought-
provoking analysis and an appealing guide to thinking about conspiracies, real and imagined. 
—Mr. Epstein most recent book is ""The Annals of unsolved crimes."" He is currently writing a book about 
Edward Snowden. 
http://www.wsj.com/articles/theyre-not-really-out-to-get-you-1450471512 
Happy New Year 
Ed 
www.edwardjayepstein.com 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031461 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029549.txt,"From: Christina Galbraith [ 
Sent: 2/8/2014 2:07:34 AM 
To: Tyler Shears 
CC: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com]; Richard Kahn ______________________________ 
Subject: Re: boosting strategy 
Importance: High 
Almost finished with a batch of content as well as a press release--you'll have it over the weekend. 
Also the PED set up a page called 'Friends' which is where they'll place jeffrey. I'll send you the URL when 
done. 
Tyler, could you check google highlighter? 
Thank you, 
Christina Galbraith 
On Feb 7, 2014, at 8:32 PM, Tyler Shears < > wrote: 
Understand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we 
can get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have 
been. 
It takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate 
URLs per our call 
We are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on 
a few top sites at no cost moving forward 
I am available for a call now or this weekend to review. 
On Feb 7, 2014, at 6:56 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good 
Search Results 
1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  
en.wilopedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein 
Wikipedia 
Jeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education 
philanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ... 
Life - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution 
2. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery  
nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n 7912/ 
New York Magazine 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029549 
He's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, socialite 
Ghislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't ... 
3. Jeffrey Epstein: Sex Offender, Yes. Billionaire, No. - Forbes  
www.forbes.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-sex-offender-yes-bil... 
Forbes 
by Clare O'Connor - in 144 Google+ circles  
Feb 28, 2011 - Palm Beach pervert Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news today, thanks to a series of 
stories in the UK's Daily Mail linking the convicted pedophile ... 
4. Jeffrey Epstein Philanthropy: Overview  
wwwjeffreyepstein.org/ 
Jeffrey Epstein Philanthropy supports innovative research and programs in science, medicine, education and 
international affairs. 
5. Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator I New ... 
nvpost.com/.../billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-im-a-... 
New York Post 
by Amber Sutherland  
Feb 25, 2011 - Billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City — and making wisecracks 
about his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an ... 
6. Jeff Epstein I Bessemer Venture Partners  
www.bvp.com Team  
Bessemer Venture Partners 
Jeff Epstein is an Operating Partner at Bes://www.bvp.com/team"">Team 
Bessemer Venture Partners 
Jeff Epstein is an Operating Partner at Bessemer Venture Partners, working out of the Menlo Park, CA office. 
• JEFFREY EPSTEIN VI FOUNDATION: Home  
wwwjeffreyepsteinfoundation.com/ 
Jeffrey Epstein, Science Philanthropist, Changes the Course of Evolution at Harvard. Wall Street Journal. NEW 
YORK, June 12, 2013 /Ten years ago the ... 
Jeffrey Epstein +1'd this 
• Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation - New York, NY - Medical & Health ...  
https://www.facebook.com/jeffreyepsteinvifoundation 
Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, New York, NY. 28 likes • 1 talking about this. The Jeffrey Epstein VI 
Foundation was founded in 2000 by Jeffrey Epstein to sponsor ... 
• Jeff Epstein profiles I LinkedIn  
www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Jeff/Epstein 
View the profiles of professionals named Jeff Epstein on LinkedIn. There are 25 professionals named Jeff 
Epstein, who use LinkedIn to exchange information, ... 
• Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD - Babylon, NY - Neurosurgery ...  
www.healthgrades.com New York (NY) Babylon  
HealthGrades 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029550 
Rating: 4.3 - 6 reviews 
Visit Healthgrades for information on Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD. Find Phon 
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Tyler Shears <1111111MIME> wrote: 
Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It 
is imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein 
about.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing 
now). 
Mr. Epstein if you have any questions on current status vs. our conversation around Jan 10. please advise - We 
are continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call. I am also available to discuss this at 
your convenience today or over weekend. 
Sincerely, 
Tyler Shears 
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Christina Galbraith 11.11> wrote: 
Hi Tyler, 
Ok thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon. 
Christina Galbraith 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Tyler Shears <1111111> 
Date: February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST 
To: Christina Galbraith 
Subject: Re: boosting strategy 
We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for ""Jeffrey Epstein"" in general. I had reserved the 
approach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure 
our URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a 
limiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like. 
Getting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once 
they are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our ""ideal"" first 
page. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second 
page they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page) 
From there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we 
can provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the 
""short-term"" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was 
changing up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated 
first page. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029551 
I feel like time was lost focusing on making sure it was Mr. Epstein properties when he has giving explicit 
permission to promote any URL required to dislodge the negatives. 
I hope this makes sense.. I haven't heard from Rich on the last invoice I sent (1/29/14) and am hoping all is 
well. Do you know if he's out of the office ? 
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Christina Galbraith <1111111 wrote: 
Hi Tyler, 
Im at a Kinko's. 
I see that you're boosting non-website url's -- are you sure this is the right approach? (vs. boosting Jeffrey's sites?) the 
.org and foundation sites are slipping down and the USVI and science are permanently off the first page. 
Thanks for you input. 
Christina 
Christina Galbraith 
cell 
email: 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
1> 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029552 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019063.txt,"(Rev. 01-31-2003) e ©

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 12/20/2006
To: Miami

From: Miami
FIG-5

Approved By:

Drafted By: b6
b7C
Case ID #: WS1E-MM-108062 (Pending)
800A-MM-C102437-AS34 (Pending)

Title: CREATION OF i2 ANALYST NOTEBOOK CHARTS

Synopsis: To document assistance provided to Intelligence

Analyst (IA)[—_—s—sCJ isn. the Creation of i2 Analyst
Notebook Charts.

Details: Intelligence Assistant (Ia)[_——séd’ provided
assistance in the creation of i2 Analyst Notebook Charts for the
above-mentioned case. The charts were produced according to the
specifications of Special AgentL —“—SS™~—C—CCC—CSY and did
not require any research or analysis on the part of Ia[_____]. The
charts depicted the arrival and departure dates of the target and
included the phone calls that were made the day prior to his
arrival, during his stay and the day after his departure. Ia
[—sC*di Created a total of 16 charts. The charts ranged in
date from 02/10/2005 through 10/06/2005.

+4

ZlE-MM- 108002 -$0

~ HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019063

"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011481.txt,"Iraq, perhaps Iran and other Middle Eastern states, might get nuclear weapons.
A violent form of fundamentalist Islam could, over time, erode existing Arab
and Muslim states, threatening Israel of course, but also the stability of our
neighbourhood and of the world. In those circumstances, even if an Israeli
government was strong enough, wise enough, forward-looking enough to
pursue avenues for negotiated peace with its immediate neighbours, getting the
popular support required would be all but impossible.

The window 1s still there. But it is only barely open.

I fear that I was right, as well, in predicting that our failure to secure a final
peace agreement with the Palestinians at Camp David might set back
peacemaking not just for a few months, but for many years. I have persisted in
trying, very hard, to make that particular prediction prove wrong. That was why,
despite intense pressure from my own political allies not to do so, I decided to
return to government in 2007 as Defence Minister. I remained in that role for
six years: mostly in the current, right-wing Likud government of my onetime
Sayeret Matkal charge, Bibi Netanyahu.

Much of what I say in this book about war and peace, security and Israel’s
future challenges, will make uncomfortable reading for Bibi. But very little of it
will surprise him, or his own Likud rivals further to the right, like Foreign
Minister Avigdor Lieberman and the Economy Minister, Naftali Bennett. I have
said almost all of it to them behind closed doors in the past few years, more than
once. When I finally decided to leave the political arena last year, it was largely
because I realized that they were guided by other imperatives. In the case of
Bibi, the most gifted politician with whom I’ve worked except for Clinton, the
priority was to stay in power. For Avigdor and Naftali, it was to supplant Bibi,
when the opportunity was ripe, as Likud leader and as Prime Minister. And
much too often — as with their hugely ill-advised recent proposal to amend
Israel’s basic law to define it explicitly as a Jewish state, and deny “national
rights” to non-Jews — the three of them have ended up competing for party
political points rather than weighing the serious future implications for the
country.

Peacemaking, as I discovered first-hand, requires taking risks. Statesmanship
requires risks. Politics, especially if defined simply as staying in power, is
almost always about the avoidance of risk.

10
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011481
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026341.txt,"communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026341
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030099.txt,"A federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East’s most prominent banks did not commit fraud and
steal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership
collapsed.

Orange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment
system because it didn’t want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan’s technology to launch its own service.

The Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan’s technology. It argued that it cancelled the
partnership because InfoSpan couldn’t produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an
established company, not one with little to no track record.

After deliberating for a day, the jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and theft
of trade secrets.

InfoSpan had asked for $540 million in damages. An attorney for InfoSpan declined to comment on the
possibility of an appeal.

The verdict capped a two-week trial that involved dueling accusations of fraud levied by high-profile attorneys
on both sides, including the former White House counsel to President Obama.

At the center of the high-stakes battle was San Juan Capistrano resident and entrepreneur Farooq Bajwa and a
mobile payment system that he said would allow migrant workers in the Middle East to send remittances back
home through text messages.

Bajwa contended that InfoSpan, with support from outside investors, spent $87 million developing the business
and technology.

To launch the system, known as SpanCash, Bajwa partnered in 2007 with Emirates Bank, which is controlled
by the United Arab Emirates’ sovereign wealth fund.

It seemed the ideal collaboration for the Pakistani immigrant, who earned millions operating another Irvine
company that manufactured computer components in the 1980s and 1990s

The Gulf States rely heavily on migrants to work construction and other low-wage jobs, offering a ready-made
market for SpanCash. InfoSpan aimed to allow migrants to transfer money back home far more cheaply than
Western Union or hawala, a traditional Middle Eastern broker-to-broker money transfer system.

A study from McKinsey & Co., cited in court records, projected annual revenue of $3.5 billion by the deal’s
fifth year, with InfoSpan receiving more than $2.8 billion in fees.

But the relationship between InfoSpan and Emirates Bank soured and the bank cancelled the deal in 2009.

A few days later, Emirates filed a criminal complaint in Dubai against Bajwa and a partner alleging that they
defrauded the bank and misrepresented InfoSpan as an established business with a working technology.

Two years later, InfoSpan sued in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana and alleged that its technology was working
and that it delivered its source code to the bank on servers. Emirates ended the deal, InfoSpan said, to launch its
own mobile payment system after stealing InfoSpan’s technology.

In court, an attorney for InfoSpan argued that Emirates torpedoed the InfoSpan relationship because it abhorred
how much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm.

“They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money,” attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing
arguments Wednesday.

Isaacson — a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator David
Boies — argued that the bank resorted to “pure extortion” in an attempt to get its way.

As a result of the bank’s criminal complaint, InfoSpan alleged Bajwa’s partner, Larry Scudder, was detained at
the Dubai International Airport and taken to a cell where he was locked in with 30 other men for 19 hours until
he secured his release by turning over his passport.

According to the lawsuit, Bajwa tried to resolve the situation but was told Scudder's passport would be released
and he could leave the country only if InfoSpan gave up ownership and control of SpanCash to the bank.

Six months later, the bank withdrew the fraud accusations and Scudder got his passport back, but SpanCash’s
reputation was tarnished and it collapsed, Bajwa previously told The Times.

The bank disputed that it acquired InfoSpan’s source code or used it at any time.

Former White House counsel and an attorney for the bank, Kathryn Ruemmler, said that Emirates never would
have acquired source code in a joint-partnership deal like the one reached with InfoSpan. She said such
technology would instead be held by a third-party escrow company for the length of the partnership.

In her closing arguments, the partner with global firm Latham & Watkins told the jury that Bajwa and InfoSpan

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030099
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010947.txt,"the crash. (Yes, some of the strongest boom years in history came during the world

depression.)

This is not to question the need for national accounts. We could not manage without
them. But the genius of accountancy is in its reporting of cash flow items.
Depreciation, even its sophisticated form used in national accounts, is a makeshift
approximation better than nothing. I argue that it is obsoleted by our access to

market-valued capital appearing in the last few decades.

Mill’s argument was that capital growth might be explained by productivity gain as
well as by thrift in deferred consumption. The way to test between them that I will
describe takes measurements of market-valued capital, its year-to-year change in
these, and consumption at the same time. I call it the simultaneous rates method. In
any year and country where consumption restraint explains growth, although the
data show none, rise in growth rate would equal current drop in consumption rate
(consumption/capital) while rate of return (output/capital) holds unchanged. When
productivity gain is the explanation, as the data confirm so far, it is consumption
rate that holds the same while growth rate and return rise equally. That’s what I
test. Data in charts and tables for those four nations from 1870 through 2010, and
from Australia, Canada, Italy and Japan from 1970 through 2010, show that faster
capital growth coincides with higher consumption rates in the same year as often as
not. Less consumption has simply meant less output with no growth to show for it.

That is the sense in which growth is free.

These countries and periods are not cherry-picked to support Mill’s idea. They are
all | have found. My source for national accounts including market-valued capital
was the website of Thomas Piketty and Gabriel Zucman adjusting their data to
uniform accounting standards and measuring them in 2010 currency units. It also
collects recent and past research by other economists modeling what national
accounts, again including accounts of market-valued capital, would have shown in

years before they were founded in 1930 or so. Simon Kuznets, for example, who

Chapter 2: Fast Forward 1/06/16 7

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010947
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017407.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

people, even those you disagree with or despise. The membership roles of both “clubs” are,
tragically, quite small under this criteria, though many claim their honorific mantles.

Being a member of the “Human Rights Club” does not require abstaining from advocacy for one’s
own group (however defined). But it does require more universal advocacy as well. The “motto”
for the club might well be the famous dictum of Hillel: “If I am not for myself, who will be for
me, but if I am for myself alone, what am I? And if not now, when?” I have tried hard to live by
these words—which hang on the wall in my office—and to maintain my membership in the
Human Rights Club, although my priorities have changed with shifting threats to particular groups
over time.

As a young lawyer, I witnessed little threat to the Jewish community in America, despite lingering
anti-Semitism in law firms, social clubs, and some universities and neighborhoods. I fought
against these remnants of bigotry, but it was clear that the trend was in the right direction: top-
down anti-Semitism and elite discrimination against Jews were on the way out. Jews did not need
my help.

By this time, I had stopped being a strictly observant Orthodox Jew. My synagogue attendees
had become episodic and my involvement in the Jewish community peripheral. The reason was
my children. Many people became more religiously committed “because of the children.” For
me, it was the opposite. As my children got old enough to ask questions, I realized that I had
remained observant only to please my parents. I did not want to impose that obligation on my
children. I remained deeply Jewish in a secular sense—whatever that may mean—and my
children were Bat and Bar Mitzvahed and attended Jewish Sunday School, but my life no longer
centered around my identity as a Jew. Nor did my legal career.

Early in my legal career, my first wife, who was also an Orthodox Jew, and I were divorced. I
assumed primary responsibility for the raising of our two sons. A decade after the divorce I met
and soon married Carolyn, who was raised as a sometime Reform and sometime Conservative
Jew in Charleston, South Carolina. Together we live a life dedicated to more secular Jewish
values. I dedicated my first book about my brand of Judaism—Chutzpah—to Carolyn. Carolyn’s
family participated in the struggle for civil rights in Charleston, and we are both deeply committed
to universal human rights.

In the early phase of my career, I didn’t focus on Jewish rights or on Israel. There were bigger
and more serious problems facing America, particularly with regard to race. There were also
more serious problems around the world: Apartheid in South Africa; repression in the Soviet
Union, China, South America and Saudi Arabia; an unjust war being fought by my own country in
Vietnam. I threw myself into these causes (as well as into the worldwide campaign to abolish the
death penalty).

320

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017407
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031916.txt,"4

Obama will have to make some decisions. But it’s far better to let the
Syrians do this themselves, if they can. We cannot prevent every
casualty. That’s starting to sound like a doctrine to me. Call it the
doctrine of no doctrine: using our power and influence but doing so
prudently and multilaterally, with the crucial recognition that Egypt is
different from Libya is different from Syria is different from
someplace else. According to the foreign-policy establishment, if you
want to have a self-respecting big-D doctrine, you’re not supposed to
recognize differences. The doctrine must guide all cases. But that is
exactly the kind of thinking that has led—always—to tragedy. The
Truman Doctrine was never meant to be applied to Vietnam. The
Bush Doctrine was applied to Iraq based on a series of lies told to the
American people. And so on. If the Obama Doctrine is nothing like
those, so much the better. This does not yet greatness make. These
dramatic changes have to work out for the better, and here the United
States has a huge role to play. With respect to Libya, for example, we
have control of about $37 billion in assets we can dole out to the
transitional council. And yes, we probably are interested in its oil.
But that doesn’t have to mean stealing it. All the Western countries
that backed the rebels have to play a constructive and non- (forgive
me for such a dated word) imperialist role in helping the country
build its future. So there’s work to be done. But it’s hardly
impossible to envision an Obama administration in a few years’ time
that has drawn down Afghanistan and Iraq, helped foster reforms and
maybe even the growth of a couple of democracies around the Middle
East, and restored the standing of a country that Bush had laid such
staggering waste. And killed Osama bin Laden. If this is weak
America-hating, count me in.

Newsweek/Daily Beast special correspondent Michael Tomasky is
also editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031916
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025648.txt,"communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025648
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033361.txt,"From: Roy Black ay

Sent: 5/29/2019 4:57:42 PM

To: Martin Weinberg fF sS& Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]; Jackie Perczek
| 2260 nye

Subject: FW: epstein

Attachments: image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg

fyi

From: Roy Black
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:57 PM

Fo:

Subject: epstein

Dear: we have no comment on the trump story. We are finalizing our pleading regarding
the plaintiff’s position on remedies. | intend to hold off commenting until we file it. After that |
will be free to comment on the pleading which will address your question. Roy

Roy Black, Esq. BLACK

SREBNICK
www.royblack.com KORNSPAN
Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, PA STUMPF

201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 TAL & APPELLATE
Miami, FL 33131

Fax:

The information in this email transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the
employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or
copying of this transmission (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
please delete all copies of this email and any attachments and notify us immediately. Thank you.

i Legal Statement

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033361
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012188.txt,"oo,
i ‘

ALLEN GUTHRIE MCHUGH & THOMAS, PLLC

Mr. John Roth
June 19, 2008
Page 6

federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein would not be “improper or inappropriate” absent any review at all
of the misconduct here, and absent a full review of the facts and law. The facts, the law, and the
alleged misconduct are each necessarily inextricably intertwined with the question of whether or not
this is a viable federal prosecution. These imposed limits flawed the review from the outset. In any
event, CEOS concedes that the defense team makes “many compelling arguments.” (CEOS letter at
p. 5). Inthe end, then, one is left with the impression that the CEOS review and opinion, although
concluding that the USAO could push forward at its own discretion, is a much qualified one.

The federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein has been a moving target from the inception, Each
time the allegations, the witnesses or the applicable law is subject to a searching inquiry, we have
found that the allegations have been misrepresented, the law does not apply to the actual facts here,
and the USAO prosecution theory falls apart. Yet, in the face of the voluminous evidence we have
submitted in this regard, while acknowledging that the theories are “novel,” and that our arguments
against federal prosecution are “compelling,” CEOS concluded, “Mr. Acosta could rightfully
conclude that this federal issue is best resolved by ajury” and that “the USAO has a good faith basis
to fully develop the facts on this issue and brief the law to permit a court to decide whether the law
appropriately reaches such conduct.” With all due respect, and recognizing that CEOS may be—and
apparently was — limited in its authority, it should not be the prerogative of the prosecution arm of
the United States government to simply roll the dice, and let the court system just sort it out when
dealing with the life and liberty of a United States citizen. The Department of Justice should not be
so cavalier when labeling someone as a child molester. While it may be within the discretion of the
USAO to do so, it is not in accord with the principles of justice.

Indeed, as noted, just a few weeks ago, the Supreme Court underscored this point in Santos
and Cuellar. The Court made clear that prosecutorial discretion does not provide the USAO cart
blanche to expand criminal statutes as they seek to do here with complete disregard for congressional
intent. The Court rejected speculation as a basis of determining the scope of a criminal statute;
“probability is not a guide which a court, in construing a penal statute, can safely take.” Slip op. at 7,
quoting United States v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat. 76,105 (1820). “We interpret ambiguous criminal
statutes in favor of defendants, not prosecutors.” Slip op. at 12.

Based on my experience, I believe that the facts here do not warrant a federal child
exploitation prosecution. At its core, this case is quintessentially a state concern as opposed to
implicating any federal interest. Indeed, the Florida State Attorney’s Office (“SAO”), led by the
chief of the Sex Crimes Division, thoroughly investigated this matter, and presented it to the grand
jury. The facts, as opposed to the deeply flawed press reports, were carefully assessed by
experienced State prosecutors who aggressively enforce State criminal laws. Following an extensive
15-month State investigation, Mr. Epstein was indicted by a State grand jury ona single felony count
of solicitation of prostitution.

During the investigation, the State prosecutor exhaustively reviewed the evidence, met face-
to-face with many of the alleged victims, considered their credibility — or lack thereof — and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012188

"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015016.txt,"You both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom,
Ghislaine Maxwell's Jeffrey Epstein in context.)

*

We start from this following precept: (the repeating 9/11s)

1. ""Toward a New World Order"" speech by Pres. George H.W. Bush — 9/11 (1990)
2. WTC Attack — 9/11 (2001)

3. BENGHAZ1 Attack — 9/11 (2012)

But you have to remember that H. W. Bush was planted:

AUTHOR PETER DALE SCOTT: Sometimes you have little deep events that most people don't even
notice. One of those would be the Halloween Massacre. The older people remember the Saturday
Night Massacre which happened under Nixon. I'm talking about the Halloween Massacre of October
31, 1975, and probably people watching this show have never heard of it.

That was under Ford, and Ford may have condoned it because it was trying to help restore his
popularity. He was going way down in the polls. But it was a very important series of events all on
the same night. The head of the CIA was fired, William Colby, replaced by a relatively unknown man
called George H. W. Bush who then went on to authorize something that Colby had refused to
authorize - the Team B report - the Team B to recalculate the Soviet threat and it was pre-
determined. They were going to find that it was much bigger than the professionals angled like
Raymond [inaudible] that | mentioned.

They said Russia is less of a threat now than it used to be. Well, that was terrible news for the
industrial complex so the Team B came in and said oh, no, no, no, it's much more of a threat than it
used to be, and that’s why we got this huge military build-up. It started actually under Carter but we
think of it as the Reagan build-up, and that of course is a major factor in having ended the Soviet
Union because the Soviet Union tried to match it with a weaker economy. And that arms race which
was not about threats but was about fighting economic war, that was an arms race which you could
say that the Soviet Union lost because they couldn't keep it up. Their economy went more and more
downhill because they were deflecting resources away from vital domestic functions. But really I'm
trying to talk here about the Halloween Massacre...

Just the change in the CIA was a major historical event but it wasn't very visible. The second thing
that happened was they fired Jim Schlesinger as Secretary of Defense... It was being done by
[President Ford's] Chief of Staff and his assistant who are two names barely known then but quite
famous since. Chief of staff was Donald Rumsfeld and the assistant was Dick Cheney. And that was
the first real intrusion of the Rumsfeld-Cheney team into American politics. And they became the real
heart of what | consider the Deep State in the 1980s when they were planning for Continuity of
Government which was a plan for emergency rules like warrantless surveillance and warrantless
detention and the militarization of homeland security. All those things were planned all through the
‘80s - COG planning by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Even when Rumsfeld wasn't in the
government, he was authorized by Reagan to do this planning.

And why is that important to our history? Because in 2001, these two men were now in the
government - Vice President and Secretary of Defense - the two top people in Washington on

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015016
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026708.txt,"International real estate focused on key markets
with potential for long-term investment
International real estate allocations also grew in
the period to 2016, though at a lower rate than
home market. Sovereigns reported that increased
international allocations in many cases represented
tactical factors such as restrictions in domestic
market or challenges achieving target allocations in
infrastructure or private equity.

As aresult, increases in international allocations
were relatively concentrated in terms of asset quality
(tier-1 assets offering a comparable return profile
of private equity and infrastructure). This has led
sovereigns to expect greater growth in high grade
office and commercial real estate (figure 20), with
long-term tenancies underpinning income generation,
over industrial or residential categories which offer
asset growth and development potential.

The importance of quality to international real
estate allocations is also evident in geographic
allocations. Sovereigns prefer ‘safe haven’ markets
such as North America and Western Europe when
investing in overseas real estate, with developed
markets leading sovereign citations for preferred real
estate locations shown in figure 21.

Sovereigns acknowledged the benefits

of external asset managers, particularly

for international allocations

The success of domestic real estate investments in

matching liabilities and the scope to capture liquidity

alpha through internal models is reflected in the pace

of home market allocations over the past three years.

However, looking forward sovereigns appreciate

that further increases may be constrained by asset

allocation or the maturity and depth of the local

market. Many sovereigns also noted that there were

risks associated with further internal investment in

home market real estate:

- Despite a focus on high-quality assets, liquidity
is a challenge for real estate investors and many
sovereigns are approaching limits on the size of
their investments

- Growing internalisation leaves sovereigns without
third-party support in governance and compliance
for their real estate investments

- lf interest rates rise, demand for real estate is
expected to slow, with implications for both asset
pricing and liquidity

However, on the assumption that interest rates

globally remain lower near-term, we expect that

sovereign demand for real estate will grow faster

than sovereigns are willing or able to deploy to

home markets. As a result, we expect that over

the next three years allocations to international

markets will grow, and diversification outside

preferred geographies and classes will accelerate.

Despite success in greenfield investing in their home

market, sovereigns are less able to influence supply

of real estate opportunities overseas, providing an

opportunity for external asset managers to support

sovereigns in sourcing and managing real estate deals.

Developed market
sovereigns have
access to a wide
range of high-
quality domestic
realestate assets.

Fig 20. Future increase in real estate sub-asset class allocations (% citations)

Sample is based on sovereign investors and excludes central banks.
Sample=25.

28

Office

Commercial

Residential

Industrial

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026708
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024275.txt,"EXPERIENCED TEAM IN INVESTING

BART STEPHENS |BRAD STEPHENS| BROCK PIERCE | PAUL STEPHENS

Chairman of the

Stephens Inv ""Stephens Inv. Bitcoin Foundation * Robertson
Mgmt, Mgmt. Board Stephens & Co.
EXPERIENCE malin Grup eee Ventures Founded 15x * RS Investments
Startups - Duke Endowment
* Pringeton * Furman Selz Raised > $200M - UC Berkeley
puke Invested in > 25x Endowment
Startups
Founded 8 crypto aa
#2 U.S. Long/Short Hedge Fund* currency startups AO Years Im sulegn
a: Valley Investment
RECOGNITION $500 Million AUM and often referred Management and
2.5x Venture Fund, 11.5% IRR to as the “father of

Banki
digital currency” anning

~ BLOCKCHAIN

CAPITAL ONE FERRY BUILDING, SUITE 255 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 investor@blockchain.capital

*Absolute Return Magazine 2004

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024275
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027416.txt,"Message: He s not going to like that

Time: 09/18/18 07:45:03 AM (558974703)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: OACSCEC3-FE48-4167-973F-147E66B93371

Gl

Message: WTF

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 09/18/18 07:47:32 AM (558974852)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F3E4080D-53BF-41D4-8DCE-0 9D92AR382E6

Message: Do you know when you are back from Europe yet

Time: 09/18/18 07:47:47 AM (558974867)
Flags: 1126401
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 1FA6O0CDA-B821-45EF-83AE-71A54C17D14D

Message: 28 sept

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 09/18/18 07:48:19 AM (558974899)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 1CDCB30D-754D-49E8-BDB9-DF351A7AD999

Message: HBJ 28th or 29?

Sender:

Time: 09/18/18 07:48:40 AM (558974920)
Flags: 1126401
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: O917ED61-3DF0-419F-BF45-9C7E21DB2E69

Message: Saturday 29 sept???

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027416
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021744.txt,"U.S. District Judge William Zloch

At sentencing, McDaniel’s public defender, Patrick Hunt, argued for a reduced
sentence, blaming his client’s immaturity for the crime. McDaniel had been a good
student at Texas Tech and had a family that supported him, Hunt told Zloch.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021744
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025890.txt,"Trending on LinkedIn
Donald Trump And The Decline Of American Character--A Cautionary Tale

‘“‘We don’t want the noise about these drugs to be price,” says Leonard Schleifer, the chief executive and
founder of Regeneron. “We have to make sure that people get access to the drug for a fair price if they’re
insured, for free if they’re not insured, or at a discount if they’re under-insured.”

Praluent’s price is 46% higher than that forecast by Evercore ISI, an investment bank, and it is being approved
for a larger group of patients than many Wall Street analysts expected following a meeting convened by the
FDA to analyze the data on the drug. Some doctors argued its use should be restricted mainly to patients with
FH. But Mark Schoenebaum, Evercore ISI’s pharmaceutical analyst, says that investors were initially
disappointed because they had hoped the FDA would greenlight the drug for an even broader group. Regeneron
shares were down 2.5% in afternoon trading before they were halted pending news.

But doctors may prescribe the drug more widely than the label suggests. A survey of physicians published this
morning by Geoffrey Porges, an biotechnology analyst at investment bank Sanford C. Bernstein, found that they
would use the drug in 30% to 40% of patients who had already had heart attacks. He wrote that 2020 sales of
Praluent could be as high as $4.8 billion.

In the survey, doctors expressed a preference for Praluent. One advantage of Regeneron’s drug is that doctors
will be able to start it at a lower, 75 milligram dose.

Schleifer, who is a medical doctor and, incidentally, a billionaire thanks to his Regeneron stake, says that the
company expects that as many as 8 million people who don’t have their cholesterol well-controlled could be
candidates for Praluent. He emphasized, though, that until larger studies prove the drug prevents heart attacks
and strokes patients should always choose statins first. It will have sales representatives a

Insurance companies and pharmacy benefit managers, who help insurers and employers manage drug costs, are
going to do their best to restrict use of Praluent, though. Brennan, the CVS Caremark executive, says that he
expects patients will need to have medical records documenting that they have already taken statins. Those not
taking statins would need a blood test confirming that a statin caused elevations in muscle or liver enzymes, not
just complaints that they were achy. “We’re not trying to replace statins,” says Schliefer, the Regeneron CEO.
Most people who have muscle problems from statins do not have those elevated muscle enzymes, says Nissen,
the Cleveland Clinic cardiologist, who is conducting a clinical trial Amgen and Pfizer, which is also developing
a similar cholesterol drug. He says he has patients who are “desperate” to take a statin but who cannot tolerate
it because of muscle pain but do not have elevated muscle enzymes.

""Dehspite significant progress over the last decades, high cholesterol remains a leading concern in the U.S. and
globally,"" said Olivier Brandicourt, M.D., Chief Executive Officer, Sanofi. ""Praluent demonstrates the power of
the Sanofi and Regeneron alliance to deliver a first-in-class therapy in the U.S. for patients in need. Sanofi has a
strong cardiovascular heritage and dedication to these patients, and we look forward to working with other
regulatory authorities to make Praluent available to patients worldwide.""

""We are grateful to the thousands of patients and investigators worldwide who participated in the ODYSSEY
clinical trial program,"" said Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D., Founder, President, and Chief Executive Officer,
Regeneron. ""Praluent represents the culmination of more than a decade of tireless work to translate the genetic-
based discovery of PCSK9 into an innovative medicine that brings meaningful value to patients.”

The approval of Praluent was based on data from the pivotal Phase 3 ODYSSEY program, which showed
consistent, positive results compared to placebo, which included current standard of care therapy (statins). In the
ODYSSEY LONG TERM trial which evaluated Praluent 150 mg every two weeks, Praluent reduced LDL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025890
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016719.txt,"OGE Fonn 278 (March 2014)
Instructions for Part 3

Note: This is a public form. Do not include account numbers, street addresses, or family member names. See instructions for required information.

Filer’s Name
Donald J. Trump 21 of 42

Part 3: Filer's Employment Agreements and Arrangements -

it | Emp yer or Party City/State -_‘|Status and Terms ie

Screen Actors Guild -
Producers

Pension Plan for Motion Picture Actors; payments received on a monthly basis. The date reflects the year that

Burbank, CA Donald J. Trump began participating in the plan.

AMERICAN FEDERATION
of TELEVISION and New York, NY Pension Plan for Television and Radio Artists; payments received on a monthly basis. The date reflects the year
RADIO ARTISTS that Donald J. Trump began participating in the plan.
Retirement Fund

2,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016719
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022604.txt,"[Section 30A of the Exchange Actlof this title shall be subject to a
civil penalty of not more than $10,000 imposed in an action brought

by the Commission.

(2)(A) Any officer, director, employee, or agent of an issuer, or stock-
holder acting on behalf of such issuer, who willfully violates subsec-
tion (a) or (g) of section 78dd-1 [Section 30A of the Exchange Act]
of this title shall be fined not more than $100,000, or imprisoned not

more than 5 years, or both.

(B) Any officer, director, employee, or agent of an issuer, or stock-
holder acting on behalf of such issuer, who violates subsection (a) or
(g) of section 78dd-1 [Section 30A of the Exchange Act] of this title
shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 imposed in

an action brought by the Commission.

(3) Whenever a fine is imposed under paragraph (2) upon any officer,
director, employee, agent, or stockholder of an issuer, such fine may

not be paid, directly or indirectly, by such issuer.

The Foreign
Corrupt
Practices Act

102

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022604
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024556.txt,"Certain Partners contributed appreciated property to KUE in exchange for their interests in KUE. Under
the Limited Partnership Agreement, and in accordance with Section 704(c) of the Code and the Treasury
regulations thereunder, income, gain, loss, and deduction with respect to any property contributed to KUE
must be allocated for tax purposes among the Partners in a manner that takes into account the variation
between the adjusted basis of such property to KUE and its fair market value at the time the property was
contributed to KUE. As a result of this requirement, it is possible the Partners who contributed
appreciated property to KUE will be allocated more income and gains, and therefore be entitled to receive
larger tax distributions under the Limited Partnership Agreement, than Partners who acquired their
interests in KUE pursuant to this offering.

14.12. Fixed Overhead Payment

KUE, and/or one or more of its subsidiaries will pay $20 million annually ta KULG in quarterly installments
beginning July 1, 2006 pursuant fo the Fixed Overhead Payment Agreement as an agreed upon payment
to provide for the reimbursement of expenses and other costs incurred by KULG on behalf of KUE and its
subsidiaries (including, but not limited to, salaries and bonuses of KULG employees providing services to
KUE and its subsidiaries, fees and expenses relating te financing transactions and acquisitions,
professional fees and other administrative expenses). To the extent that the U.S. $2,500,000 fee payable
pursuant to an existing management services agreement with Knowledge Learning Corporation is paid to
any person or entity other than a subsidiary of KUE, the amount payable to KULG by KUE will be reduced
by the amount of such payment to such other person or entity. The $20 million annual fee will terminate
upon the Initial Listing or the sale of KUE to a person or entity that is not a KUE LLC Entity.

14.13. liquidity Period

KUE will operate for a period of seven years from the date of the first closing of this offering. If there has
not been an Initial Listing by the end of seven years from the date of the first closing of this offering, the
Board of Directors of the General Partner will determine whether to pursue a sale of KUE or an Initial
Listing (or a dual track process); provided, however, in the event that not less than 75% of the value of
KUE at that time is represented by shares of securities listed on one or more recognized international
securities exchanges and such shares have been or will be distributed as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter to the Investors and the Investors have received distributions of cash and/or such securities
valued at amounts equal fo or in excess of their original capital contributions, then there will be two
extensions of one year's duration each (as determined by the Board of Directors of the General Partner)
in order for KUE to complete either an Initial Listing or to have the remaining value of KUE represented by
shares of securities listed on a recognized international securities exchange and to distribute such shares
to the Investors.

If the Board determines to pursue a sale of KUE (or an Initial Listing or a dual track process), then the
Principals must determine at such time whether they intend to participate as a potential bidder in the sale
process.

If the Principals elect not to participate as a potential bidder in a sale process, then they will not be
allowed to subsequently elect to participate as a potential bidder unless the sale process does not result
in a buyer at a price the Independent Committee deems to be ""fair."" If the sale process results in a
transaction that the Independent Committee deems to be ""fair"", the Principals will be required to sell their
entire stake in KUE (Common LP Units and Profits Participation LP Units on an ""as converted"" basis) on
the same terms as the Investors.

If the Principals elect to participate as a potential bidder in a sale process, then the sale process will be
managed by the Independent Committee and the Principals will be precluded from participating in Board
deliberations regarding the sale process. In addition, the Principals will be required to sell their entire
stake in KUE on the same terms as the Investors to the winning bidder in the event the Principals do not
submit the most attractive bid.

123

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024556
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026652.txt,">> 
From: Kathy Ruemmler 
Sent: 1/24/2017 4:21:55 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in 
Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions 
Attachments: image001.jpg; image005.jpg; image004.jpg; image003.jpg; image007.jpg; image008.jpg; image002.jpg; image006.jpg 
Importance: High 
Look at this craziness. 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: <____________________________ 
Date: January 24, 2017 at 10:54:59 AM EST 
To: < 
Subject: FW: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent 
Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions 
From: Zuieback, Jamie (DC) < 
Date: Tuesday, Jan 24, 2017, 10:37 AM 
To: Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) < >> 
Subject: RE: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee 
Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions 
I'm dying to hear about your weekend. I can't take credit, but I heard someone say that you handling this was 
like asking your buddies if they had anyone who could fill in for a pick-up game, and somebody sends over 
LeBron. 
From: Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) 
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 10:24 AM 
To: Glick, Jamie (DC); Kurlander, Stuart (DC) 
Cc: Zuieback, Jamie (DC); Alexander, Kimberly (DC) 
Subject: RE: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee 
Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions 
Gotta love the conspiracy theorists 
From: Glick, Jamie (DC) <____________ 
Date: Tuesday, Jan 24, 2017, 10:04 AM 
To: Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) < >, Kurlander, 
Stuart (DC) < 
Cc: Zuieback, Jamie (DC) < >, Alexander, 
Kimberly (DC) <>> 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026652 
Subject: Press: Heatstreat- 'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee 
Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions 
Hi Kathy and Stuart, 
You may have already seen this article, but sharing it just in case you haven't. Please let us know if we can be 
of any help coordinating with the client's PR firm, which Stuart mentioned that you were doing yesterday. 
According to Wikipedia, ""Heat Street is a libertarian conservative news, opinion and commentary website. 
Launched in February 2016, the website is headed by U.S. based British writer and former politician Louise 
Mensch. It is owned by News Corp under Dow Jones & Company."" 
Thanks, 
Jamie 
'Shady' Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day 
Riot, Raising Questions<http://heatst.com/politics/shady-israeli-mogul-hires-ex-white-house-counsel-to-
represent-employee-arrested-in-inauguration-day-riot-raising-questions/> 
By Heat Street Staffl 6:36 pm, January 23, 2017 
The mystery surrounding a would-be media magnate — who owns surveillance and security firms working for 
repressive regimes — is growing. 
The questions about Matania (Mati) Kochavi were sparked again this weekend when Kathryn Ruemmler, who 
until recently was President Obama's White House Counsel, showed up on Saturday morning in local 
Washington DC court to represent one of the 217 people arrested for rioting on Inauguration Day. 
[http://heatst.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ruemmler-obamajpg?w=300]Kathryn Ruemmler and client. 
Ms. Ruemmler said she was there to represent a journalist, on assignment for the media company 
Vocativ<http://www.vocativ.com/>, who'd gotten swept up with the protesters in the arrests. 
Vocativ is owned by Kochavi. Reporters at the courthouse asked why a big gun like Ruemmler, who has long 
been a specialist in corporate crime, would show up for what would seem to be a misunderstanding involving a 
journalist doing his job. 
Ms. Ruemmler told Buzzfeed that Vocativ is a client of her 
firm,<http s ://www.buzz feed. co m/zo etillman/pro s ecutors-pursue-rioting- charges- over-inauguration- day-
pro?utm term=.gtPej4zonti.cgyzaBvG2> Latham & Watkins. The firm is one of the most prestigious law shops 
in New York and Washington with partners such as Ruemmler<https://www.lw.com/people/kathrynruemmler> 
charging thousands of dollars an hour. 
She did look somewhat out of place among the lawyers there to defend anarchists and other alleged 
troublemakers who are charged with rioting, burning a limo and smashing up stores on the streets of the capital. 
""The individuals charged were generally brought in front of the judge in groups of 10 and were represented by a 
cadre of public defenders and other court-appointed lawyers,"" according to Buzzfeed. That was not the case 
when it came to Vocativ. 
Based in New York and Tel Aviv, Vocativ publishes mostly reprints of health studies, aggregated videos for 
Facebook, and female focused feature pieces. The company which employs a large team of US journalists and 
ex-Israeli intelligence operatives, claims to use technology from the intelligence world to source its stories. 
Indeed its founder, Kochavi, has a background in Israeli intelligence, having made his fortune providing 
security and military grade public safety solutions to the superrich Emirate of Abu Dhabi through an entity 
called AGT. 
[http ://heatst. com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/abu-dhabi-mosque.jp g?w=300] The Grand Mosque of Abu 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026653 
Dhabi 
AGT was responsible for installing a ""unique civil surveillance network in Abu Dhabi that means 'every person 
is monitored from the moment they leave their doorstep to the moment they return to it,' according to the noted 
security publication MiddleEastEye.<http ://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uae-israel-surveillance-2104952769> 
The invasive system is dubbed ""Falcon Eye"". 
Kochavi also owns Israeli security and private intelligence firms 3iMind and Logic Industries. Like Vocativ, 
3iMind claims to use ""the deep web"" to mine information, though in 3iMind's case it provides spy services, not 
journalistic ones. 3iMind even advertises online that it will spy on ""the planning and execution of violent civil 
unrest"" for clients.<https://www.3i-mind.com/use cases/political-social-unrest/> 
The website for Kochavi's mother company<https://www.agtinternational.com/about/>, AGT, claims its current 
business is using ""Internet of Things"" technology for entertainment and ""fashion"" applications in partnership 
with the giant talent agency WME-IMG ... though it's unclear what any of these applications really 
are<http://www.euroleague.net/final-four/berlin-2016/news/i/6vokoibj5fsgqg4q/heed-the-event-platform-based-
joint-venture-between-wme-img-and-agt-international-makes-first-official-foray-into-sports>, and certainly 
what value they provide for entertainment. Security experts say Internet of Things type sensors could be tied 
together to monitor crowds for security purposes. 
According to Israeli and U.S. Jewish publications, the lines within Kochavi's companies can blur, with Vocativ 
employees doing work for 3iMind and Logic, and vice versa. So who was this ""journalist"" arrested amid the 
unrest on Inauguration Day? Was he actually doing journalism? Or, as some journalists around town have been 
asking, could he also have been doing surveillance of anti-Trump demonstrators on behalf of an Arab or Israeli 
client, possibly a foreign government? 
[http ://heatst. com/wp-
content/up lo ads/2017/01/aaeaaqaaaaaaaaq5 aaaaj dq3mjuxmgu2ltg5nj mtndilmclhzmrhltllyj kynz e5 zj lj mg. j p g?w 
=300]Kochavi employee Evan Engel (LinkedIn) 
A call to Ruemmler was returned by someone identifying himself as a Vocativ spokesperson. He told Heat 
Street that the arrested employee, Evan Engel, was doing purely journalistic work at the time he was detained. 
""The arrest, detainment and rioting charge against journalist Evan Engel who was covering the protests for 
Vocativ are an affront to the First Amendment and journalistic freedom,"" the spokesperson said. ""Vocativ will 
vigorously contest this unfounded and outrageous charge."" 
Kochavi has taken pains to put a different face, unrelated to spying and surveillance, on his American activities. 
Vocativ acts like a news organization, though it's made little splash (and gets remarkably little web 
traffic<http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/vocativ.com>) for an operation so large and expensive. 
Kochavi has also shown little hesitation to pay top dollar for access to the most powerful figures in America to 
provide legitimacy for his American activities. Last fall's Wikipedia data dump revealed that he and his 
longtime business partner, New York rainmaking lawyer Mary Edelman, offered Bill Clinton millions of dollars 
to serve as honorary chairman of the company that would become Vocativ. <http://heatst.com/biz/wikileaks-
bill-clinton-turned-down-8-million-to-be-honorary-chairman-of-news-site-vocativ/> Clinton turned them down, 
perhaps nervous about Kochavi who's been described as ""a mysterious even somewhat shady character"" and the 
Israeli ""version of the old-fashioned arms dealer with a suit and an MBA"" by the progressive Jewish blog 
Tikkun Olam.<https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2014/12/04/israeli-cyber-security-merchant-peddles-wares-
secretly-in-united-arab-emirates/> 
[http://heatst.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/akochavivivian.jpg?w=260]Matania Kochavi (C) shown with 
Vivian Schiller (L) chair of Vocativ's executive committee and Danna Rabin (R) AGT's chief operations 
officer. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026654 
And now Kochavi has purchased the services of President Obama's former White House counsel, Ruemmler, 
whose name was once on the shortlist<http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-ruemmler-attorney-general-nixed-
20141024-story.html> for US attorney general. It's a fair question to ask: why was Ruemmler really down in 
local DC court on a Saturday morning? Why was getting this Vocativ employee off the hook such a high 
priority? And what, if any, other services has Ruemmler, the corporate crime expert, been providing to Kochavi 
and his various intelligence operations around the world? 
Ruemmler herself has not returned requests for comment. 
From: Glick, Jamie (DC) 
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 6:03 PM 
To: Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) 
Subject: Press: Buzzfeed and NY Post- Prosecutors Charge Protesters With Rioting Over Inauguration Day 
Protests 
Hi Kathy, 
In case you haven't seen, below are a couple of articles and tweets which mention your representation of a 
journalist employed by Vocativ. 
Thanks, 
Jamie 
Jamie C. Glick 
Public Relations Specialist 
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 
555 Eleventh Street, NW 
Suite 1000 
Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 
Direct Dial: + 
Fax: 
Email: 
Prosecutors Charge Protesters With Rioting Over Inauguration Day 
Protests<http s ://www.buzz feed. com/zo etillman/pro s ecutors-pursue-rioting-charges-over- inauguration-day-
pro?utm term=.mxL7rr54B2#.ygykppRw0v> 
More than 200 people are being charged with felony rioting — a charge that carries a maximum sentence of 10 
years in jail — after they were arrested during anti-Trump demonstrations on Inauguration Day in DC. 
posted on Jan. 21, 2017, at 8:33 p.m. 
[Zoe Tillman]<https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman?language=en> 
Zoe Tillman<https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman?language=en> 
BuzzFeed News Reporter 
[https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2017-01/21/10/asset/buzzfeed-prod-web-09/sub-buzz-24787-
1485014343-1.jpg?resize=990:806] 
A man arrested during protests in DC on Jan. 20 waits to board a police van. Zoe Tillman / BuzzFeed News 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026655 
WASHINGTON — As hundreds of thousands of demonstrators 
gathered<https://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeednews/womens-
march?utm term=.wra9MGEmBAgtOrQXPW34> on the National Mall to protest President Trump on 
Saturday, people arrested<https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/rioters-and-police-are-clash-during-trumps-
inauguration> the day before during anti-Trump protests in downtown Washington, DC, made their first 
appearance in court. 
Prosecutors are pursuing charges against all of the 230 people arrested on Friday for rioting, according to the 
US attorney's office in DC. Although anti-Trump demonstrations on inauguration day were largely peaceful, 
some turned violent, with participants breaking storefront windows, throwing bricks at police, and running 
through streets and parks downtown as they were chased by police. 
The arraignment hearing at DC Superior Court began on Saturday around 1 p.m. and was still going six hours 
later. As of 7 p.m., 80 people arrested and charged with felony rioting had come before a judge. The court was 
expected to continue the hearing through the night until everyone arrested on Friday came through. 
The defendants processed so far were released until their next court dates, with the condition that they not be 
arrested again in DC in the meantime. 
Felony rioting is a crime under DC law that carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in jail and a fine of up to 
$25,000. According to police, six officers were injured in confrontations with demonstrators on Jan. 20, and 
three of those officers sustained minor head injuries after objects were thrown at them. The DC law defines 
felony rioting as a group of at least five people who, ""by tumultuous and violent conduct and the threat thereof,"" 
cause ""serious bodily harm"" or property damage valued at more than $5,000. 
A 21-year-old Texas man was also charged with pointing a laser at at US Park Police helicopter during the 
protests on Friday. He was arraigned in Superior Court but the case is being moved to federal court. 
The individuals charged with rioting were generally brought in front of the judge in groups of 10 and were 
represented by a cadre of public defenders and other court-appointed lawyers. One exception came early in the 
hearing, when former White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler entered an appearance for one of the 
defendants. Ruemmler said her client was a journalist on assignment filming the demonstrations who was swept 
up in the arrests. 
Ruemmler served as President Obama's White House counsel for three years before going to the law firm 
Latham & Watkins. Ruemmler told reporters outside of the courtroom that her firm represents Vocativ, the 
media company that employed her client, which is how she got involved. 
Dozens of people came to the courthouse on Saturday to support the arrestees. They cheered as defendants left 
the courtroom; some of the defendants were walking slowly to keep their shoes on because they had to remove 
their shoelaces after being arrested. The defendants were held by police overnight. 
[https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2017-01/21/20/asset/buzzfeed-prod-web-15/sub-buzz-1449-
1485047203-1.jpg?resize=990:743] 
Zoe Tillman / BuzzFeed News 
By Saturday night, a crowd had gathered outside the courthouse to greet the arrestees, cheering and applauding 
as they came out. A line of police formed in between the group and the courthouse entrance, and police were 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026656 
screening people trying to go inside. 
Several lawyers offered a preview of their defense strategy during the hearing, arguing that the rioting charge 
should be dismissed because prosecutors hadn't shown that each defendant was specifically involved in the 
rioting described in charging documents. Although the defendants were brought out in groups before the judge, 
they're individually charged. 
One lawyer argued that the US attorney's office should recuse from prosecuting the cases because the 
defendants were charged with participating in anti-Trump riots and Trump was now in charge of the US 
Department of Justice. 
""I appreciate all the creative arguments,"" Magistrate Judge Rainey Brandt said in response, but she said that at 
this early stage of the case she only had to find that the government had shown probable cause to move the 
cases forward. 
The defendants are due back in court on various dates in February and March. 
1. [https://pbs.twimg.com/profile images/1849163545/Zoe Tillman_photol bigger.jpg] Zoe Tillman 
@ZoeTillman <https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman> Jan 
21<https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/822908408475095049> Ruemmler told reporters that her law firm 
Latham & Watkins has done work for the news outlet, Vocativ, which is how she got involved 1 reply 5 
retweets 3 likes 
2. 
3. [https://pbs.twimg.com/profile images/1849163545/Zoe Tillman_photol bigger.jp g] Zoe Tillman 
@ZoeTillman <https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman> Jan 
21<https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/822908213557415938> One journalist arraigned, lawyer says he was 
arrested while filming. He's represented by former White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler 0 replies 19 
retweets 36 likes 
Inauguration Day protesters may face felony rioting charges<http://nypost.com/2017/01/22/inauguration-day-
protesters-may-face-felony-rioting-charges/> 
By Sophia Rosenbaum<http://nypost.com/author/sophia-rosenbaum/> 
New York Post 
January 22, 2017112:55pm 
Officials in the nation's capital are throwing the book at anti-Trump protesters —threatening the people who 
were arrested <http ://nyp o st. com/2017/01/20/dozens-arrested-as-anti-trump-protesters-clash-with-p o lice> with 
massive fines and up to 10 years in jail. 
The U.S. attorney's office will seek to charge all 230 of the protesters who took to the streets on Inauguration 
Day — some damaging storefronts and clashing with police — with felony rioting. 
As of Saturday evening, 80 people had already been slapped with the heavy charges, which include fines of up 
to $25,000 and up to 10 years in jail, according to 
Buzzfeed.<http s ://www.buzzfeed. com/z o etillman/pro secutors-pursue-rioting-charges-over-inaugurati on-day-
pro?utm term=. dw6wmW1b#. ahOrzlyD> 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026657 
Felony rioting is defined in D.C. law by at least five people who use ""tumultuous and violent conduct of the 
threat thereof' to cause ""serious bodily harm"" and instigate more than $5,000 in property damage. 
Six local officers were injured by protesters during Trump's big day. The glass windows of several businesses 
were shattered in downtown D.C. including Bank of America, McDonald's and Starbucks. 
All of the people who have already been charged were released on their own recognizance and given their next 
court appearance dates. 
At least one of those arrested was a Vocativ journalist covering the protests, and he was defended by heavy-
hitter and former White House attorney Kathryn Ruemmler, Buzzfeed reported. 
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of 
the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission 
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. 
Latham & Watkins LLP 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026658 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013006.txt,"90 4 Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures

Protocol and Situation Memory

>

: Action
A

—_

(aust
+ active

Urges (Drives)

Fig. 4.14: High-Level Architecture of the Psi Model

volved. These are very low level processes whose analogues in human experience are largely
below the conscious level.

A Goal is considered as a statement that the system may strive to make true at some future
time. A Motive is an (urge, goal) pair, consisting of a goal whose satisfaction is predicted to
imply the satisfaction of some urge. In fact one may consider Urges as top-level goals, and the
agent’s other goals as their subgoals.

In Psi an agent has one “ruling motive” at any point in time, but this seems an oversimpli-
fication more applicable to simple animals than to human-like or other advanced AI systems.
In general one may think of different motives having different weights indicating the amount of
resources that will be spent on pursuing them.

Emotions in Psi are considered as complex systemic response-patterns rather than explicitly
constructed entities. An emotion is the set of mental entities activated in response to a certain
set of urges. Dorner conceived theories about how various common emotions emerge from the
dynamics of urges and motives as described in the Psi model. “Intentions” are also considered as
composite entities: an intention at a given point in time consists of the active motives, together
with their related goals, behavior programs and so forth.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013006
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028826.txt,"InsightsPod

activities. We will enlist the help of consultants familiar with government bidding
processes, and those who have contacts within different departments. We will also
pursue political parties.

Due to InsightsPod being a new entity, we understand that we will have to prove our
company's worth to businesses in order to earn their respect and business. We will
provide free sample reports to potential clients. InsightsPod will also offer an 800
number phone line for customer service purposes.

Pricing

Customers will be charged according to the number of impressions being processed by
InsightsPod. Customers will pay an optional consulting fee for specialized services. For
example helping a political party in engaging voters during elections.

No. of Impressions Cost
(Monthly Subscription) (USD)

0-100,000 $999

250,001-500,000 $2,600
500,001-1,000,000 $3,500
1,000,001-2,000,000 $5,000

*impression = 1 Facebook comment or 1 Tweet

| Page 9 |

CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT DISSEMINATE. This business plan contains confidential, trade-secret
information and is shared only with the understanding that you will not share its contents or ideas with
third parties without the express written consent of the plan author.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028826
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022265.txt,"From: Weingarten, Reid Rl

Sent: 3/15/2017 12:14:18 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High
Corruption...client is Richard ireland

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: jeffrey E.

Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 8:12 AM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

turk or...

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Weingarten, Reid <> wrote:

Pennsylvania

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: jeffrey E.

Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:52 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

Which case

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:55 PM Weingarten, Reid <q > wrote:
Bet trump leaked the 2 pages...cross the government's star witness tomorrow...it's odd | still do this shit...

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: jeffrey E.

Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 10:59 AM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject:

jack morris partner marino could be the problem forlicencing. ibis can help i think

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022265
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030030.txt,"﻿                    
29 March, 2011

Article 1.	Foreign Policy
The Syrian Time Bomb
Patrick Seale	
Article 2.	Politico
Obama failing as commander in chief
Robert D. Blackwill	
Article 3.	The Financial Times
Libya, a last hurrah for the west
Gideon Rachman	
Article 4.	NYT
President Obama on Libya
Editorial	
Article 5.	The Daily Star   
Egypt's new Constitution: an update
Nathan Brown	
Article 6.	NYT
Arabs Will Be Free
Roger Cohen	
Article 7. 	The Daily Star   
The West still beats the rest, but it may no longer be best
Robert Skidelsky	
Article 8.	Wall Street Journal
Norway to Jews: You're Not Welcome Here 
Alan M. Dershowitz	



Article 1.

Foreign Policy

The Syrian Time Bomb

Patrick Seale



March 28, 2011 -- While one war rages in Libya, another rages in Washington as to the necessity of U.S. action there. Indeed, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said as much this weekend, noting that Libya was not a ""vital national interest."" But if Washington is looking for an Arab state in the throes of unrest, one that is key to its regional and national interests, planners might want to pay more attention to Syria, which is currently undergoing upheaval not seen since the early 1980s. Syria lies at the center of a dense network of Middle East relationships, and the crisis in that country -- which has now resulted in the deaths of well over 100 civilians, and possibly close to double that number -- is likely to have a major impact on the regional structure of power. The need to contain pressure from the United States and Israel, for decades the all-consuming concern of Syria's leadership, has suddenly been displaced by an explosion of popular protest highlighting urgent and long-neglected domestic issues. 

If the regime fails to tame this domestic unrest, Syria's external influence will inevitably be enfeebled, with dramatic repercussions across the Middle East. As the crisis deepens, Syria's allies tremble. Meanwhile, its enemies rejoice, as a weakened Syria would remove an obstacle to their ambitions. But nature abhors a vacuum, and what will come will be unpredictable, at best. 

The protests started in mid-March in Daraa, in southern Syria, a city that has suffered from drought and neglect by the government in Damascus. The heavy hand of the ruling Baath party was particularly resented. Because it lies on the border with Jordan, and therefore in a security zone, all land sales required the security services' approval, a slow and often costly business. This is one of the particular grievances that have powered the protest movement, though certainly the ripples of the successful Egyptian and Tunisian uprisings played a hand. The government, to put it bluntly, responded poorly. Troops in Daraa fired live rounds against youthful demonstrators and virtually all communications -- Internet and telephone -- were shuttered to prevent the seepage of unrest. 

To make matters worse, Damascus blamed Israeli provocateurs, rebel forces, and shady foreign agents for the bloodshed -- anyone but its own forces. Civilian deaths at the hands of security forces there, and more recently in the coastal city of Latakia, have outraged opinion across the country, setting alight long pent-up anger at the denial of basic freedoms, the monopolistic rule of the Baath party, and the abuses of a privileged elite. To these ills should be added severe youth unemployment, devastation of the countryside by a grave shortage of rainfall over the past four years, and the impoverishment of the middle and lower classes by low wages and high inflation. 

In response to the public unrest, the regime has released some political prisoners and pledged to end the state of emergency in force since 1963. A government spokeswoman has hinted that coming reforms will include greater freedom for the press and the right to form political parties. President Bashar al-Assad is due to address the country in the next 48 hours. His speech is eagerly awaited, but it remains to be seen whether it will be enough to defuse the crisis and win time for the regime. If not, demonstrations could gather pace, triggering still more violent repression by the security services -- an escalation with unpredictable consequences. 

The protesters have in fact challenged the fundamentals of Syria's security state, a harsh system of controls over every aspect of society, put in place by the late Hafez al-Assad, Bashar's father, who ruled for 30 years from 1970 to his death in 2000. By all accounts, the debate about how to deal with the growing protests has led to increasingly violent confrontations inside the regime between would-be reformers and hard-liners. The outcome of this internal contest remains uncertain. 

What is certain, however, is that what happens in Syria is of great concern to the whole region. Together with its two principal allies, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Lebanese Shiite resistance movement Hezbollah, Syria is viewed with great hostility by Israel and with wary suspicion by the United States. The Tehran-Damascus-Hezbollah axis -- of which Syria is the linchpin -- has long been seen by many leaders in the region as the lone bulwark against Israeli and American hegemony. With backing from Washington, Israel has sought to smash Hezbollah (notably through its 2006 invasion of Lebanon) and detach Syria from Iran, a country Israel views as its most dangerous regional rival. Neither objective has so far been realized. But now that Syria has been weakened by internal problems, the viability of the entire axis is in danger -- which could encourage dangerous risk-taking behavior by its allies as they seek to counter perceived gains by the United States and Israel. 

If the Syrian regime were to be severely weakened by popular dissent, if only for a short while, Iran's influence in Arab affairs would almost certainly be reduced -- in both Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. In Lebanon, it would appear that Hezbollah has already been thrown on the defensive. Although it remains the most powerful single movement, both politically and on account of its armed militia, its local enemies sense a turning of the tide in their favor. This might explain a violent speech delivered earlier this month by the Sunni Muslim leader and former prime minister Saad Hariri, in which he blatantly played the sectarian card. 

Cheered by his jubilant supporters, he charged that Hezbollah's weapons were not so much a threat to Israel as to Lebanon's own freedom, independence, and sovereignty -- at the hand of a foreign power, namely Iran. The Syrian uprisings may have already deepened the sectarian divide in Lebanon, raising once more the specter of civil war and making more difficult the task of forming a new government, a job President Michel Suleiman has entrusted to the Tripoli notable, Najib Mikati. If Syria were overrun with internal strife, Hezbollah would be deprived of a valuable ally -- no doubt to Israel's great satisfaction. 

Meanwhile, Turkey is deeply concerned by the Syrian disturbances: Damascus has been the cornerstone of Ankara's ambitious Arab policy. Turkey-Syria relations have flourished in recent years as Turkey-Israel relations have grown cold. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, have actively sought to mediate local conflicts and bring much-needed stability to the region by forging close economic links. One of their bold projects is the creation of an economic bloc comprising Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan -- already something of a reality by the removal of visa requirements as well as by an injection of Turkish investment and technological know-how. A power struggle in Syria could set back this project; and regime change in Damascus would likely put a serious dent in further Turkish initiatives. 

Turkey's loss, however, may turn out to be Egypt's gain. Freed from the stagnant rule of former President Hosni Mubarak, Cairo is now expected to play a more active role in Arab affairs. Instead of continuing Mubarak's policy, conducted in complicity with Israel, of punishing Gaza and isolating its Hamas government, Egypt is reported to be pushing for a reconciliation of the rival Palestinian factions, Hamas and Fatah. If successful, this could help defuse the current dangerous escalation of violence between Israel on the one side and Hamas and still more extreme Gaza-based Palestinian groups on the other. But Syria's internal troubles might just as easily have a negative effect. 

Undoubtedly, the failed peace process has bred extreme frustration among Palestinian militants, some of whom may think that a sharp shock is needed to wrench international attention away from the Arab democratic wave and back to the Palestine problem. They are anxious to alert the United States and Europe to the danger of allowing the peace process to sink into a prolonged coma. Israeli hard-liners, too, may calculate that a short war could serve their purpose: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government may sense weakness and quietly dream of finishing off Hamas once and for all. Syria has been a strong supporter of Hamas and has given a base in Damascus to the head of its political bureau, Khaled Mashal. Turmoil in Damascus could deal Hamas a severe blow. 

On all these fronts -- Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Lebanon, Palestine, Israel -- Syria is a key player. But its internal problems now threaten to reshuffle the cards, adding to the general sense of insecurity and latent violence in the region. And of all the threats facing the Middle East, perhaps the greatest -- greater even than of another Arab-Israeli clash -- is that of rampant sectarianism, poisoning relationships between and within states, and breeding hate, intolerance, and mistrust.  

Several of the modern states of the Middle East -- and Syria is no exception -- were built on a mosaic of ancient religions, sects, and ethnic groups held uneasily and sometimes uncomfortably together by central government. But governments have themselves been far from neutral, favoring one community over another in cynical power plays. Many Sunni Muslims in Syria and throughout the region feel that Assad's Syria has unduly favored the Alawites, a sect of Shiite Islam, who constitute some 12 percent of the population but control a vastly greater percentage of the country's wealth. Open conflict between Sunnis and Alawites in Syria would profoundly disturb the whole region, creating a nightmare scenario for Washington and other Western capitals. 

Meanwhile, Washington seems at a loss as to how to respond to the growing unrest in Syria. In tempered language, the administration has condemned the use of violence against civilians and encouraged political reform. But the undertones are evident: Stability in Syria may still preferable to yet another experiment in Arab governance. Assad will need to act quickly and decisively -- and one hopes not harshly -- to quell the rising current of dissent. Indeed, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton seemed to offer the regime some modest support this weekend, noting that she believed Bashar to be a ""reformer."" But reform has never been a primary goal of the Assad clan, which has long favored stability over change. 

This edifice may now be crumbling, and the United States would be wise to spend a little less time thinking about Libya and a little more time thinking about a state that truly has implications on U.S. national interests. If things go south in Syria, blood-thirsty sectarian demons risk being unleashed, and the entire region could be consumed in an orgy of violence.  



Patrick Seale is a British writer who specializes in Middle East affairs. His latest book is The Struggle for Arab Independence: Riad el-Solh and the Makers of the Modern Middle East. 






Article 2.

Politico

Obama failing as commander in chief
Robert D. Blackwill 


March 28, 2011 -- The Obama administration deserves credit for its foreign policy achievements.

There has been no successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil. President Barack Obama and his colleagues have, thus far, skillfully handled the popular eruptions in Tunisia and Egypt — though those crises are far from over. They strengthened sanctions against Iran regarding its nuclear weapons program; reset U.S.-Russia relations and completed the New START Treaty. They have begun to deal effectively with the rise of Chinese power; continued, after a slow start, the transformation of U.S.-India relations, and signed a bilateral trade accord with South Korea. They also modernized the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with summit agreements on a new strategic concept and ballistic missile defense.

But the administration’s record of failure is equally as long. It has not seriously tackled our deficit and debt problem, the single greatest threat to long-term U.S. power and influence. It is now mishandling relations with the Gulf Arab monarchs and made a mess of the Middle East peace process. It has allowed the U.S.-Turkey relationship to reach historic lows, just as Turkey is becoming a formidable actor in the Greater Middle East.

By concentrating on health care for its first two years, the administration, and the large majorities in Congress, missed a crucial opportunity to pass climate change legislation. With the Democratic party’s internal constituencies, there also has been almost no movement on international trade.

Right now, nobody has a successful formula for helping Pakistan — with its 100-plus nuclear weapons — arrest its systemic decline; or for coercing North Korea to slow its growing nuclear weapons and missile capabilities. So the administration gets the benefit of the doubt on those two perplexing problems.

Obama has, however, failed in the most important presidential power: to act as a wise commander in chief. He is seriously mismanaging all three wars the U.S. is now engaged in.

In Iraq, over the past decade, the United States has lost 4,500 American lives, has had 33,000 wounded and has spent a trillion dollars to promote vital U.S. national interests. But we are in danger of losing that enormous sacrifice in blood and treasure to meet the president’s deadline of withdrawing all U.S. troops by the end of this year.

That is a huge strategic mistake. It could, over time, plunge that pivotal nation back into civil war. We should keep roughly 40,000 combat troops in Iraq for the foreseeable future, to make an indispensable contribution to Iraq’s stability and prevent Iranian dominance. We should now be lobbying the Iraqi government hard to accept this.

In Afghanistan, Obama has dramatically escalated U.S. troop commitment — now more than 100,000 — in a war that Bob Woodward says in his book, “Obama’s Wars,” that the president does not believe in. U.S. policy toward Afghanistan involves spending $100 billion and suffering several hundred allied deaths annually — 500 Americans dead last year, thousands more injured. All this to deal with 100 or so Al Qaeda fighters now in Afghanistan; and prevent the Afghan Taliban from controlling the Pashtun Afghan homeland — which was not the reason we went there after Sept. 11. Our mission was to eradicate Al Qaeda — now largely accomplished — not fight the Taliban.

In policy terms, this has been enormous mission creep far beyond our national interests. The current U.S. counterinsurgency strategy appears likely to fail. Washington and its allies will not defeat the Taliban militarily. President Hamid Karzai’s corrupt government is unlikely to improve significantly. The Afghan National Army cannot take over combat missions from the U.S. in southern and eastern Afghanistan in any realistic time frame. And the Pakistan army will not move against Afghan Taliban sanctuaries in Pakistan.
De facto Afghan partition offers the Obama administration the best alternative to strategic defeat. The administration should stop setting withdrawal deadlines and instead commit the United States to a long-term combat role in Afghanistan, with roughly 35,000 to 50,000 troops, for the next seven to 10 years.
Washington should also accept that the Taliban are likely to control most of the Pashtun south and east. The price of forestalling that is far too high for Americans to continue paying. Washington and its partners should let the local correlation of forces take its course in the Pashtun homeland — while deploying U.S. air power and Special Forces to ensure that the north and west of Afghanistan do not succumb to the Taliban.
In Libya, the president has gotten us militarily into the middle of a civil war in a country of little importance to the United States. And he offers no clear strategy to reach his ambitious objectives. The administration’s inconsistent, even incoherent, statements on the Libya war wrestle each other for dominance in the daily news cycle, while NATO predictably founders without robust U.S. leadership.
The U.S. should quickly end its military role in the Libyan civil war. We should leave that to the European allies — if they want to take it up — and return to issues of far greater importance to our country, like our fiscal problems.

We can only speculate why Obama has such difficulty in effectively using the U.S. military as an instrument of national purpose.
Winston Churchill said, “In critical and baffling situations, it is always best to return to first principle and simple action.”
What is Obama’s first principle regarding the application of the use of force in the international arena? He seems to possess no abiding strategic framework about that preeminent presidential responsibility. He makes no clear connection between the use of force and vital U.S. national interests.
Thus, he recklessly withdraws from Iraq, imprudently escalates in Afghanistan and unwisely intervenes in Libya. One can only wonder and worry what he will do if and when he confronts the next crisis which could involve committing American men and women to combat.

Robert D. Blackwill is Henry A. Kissinger senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations. He served as deputy national security adviser for strategic planning, ambassador to India and presidential envoy to Iraq in the George W. Bush administration.

 
Article 3.

The Financial Times

Libya, a last hurrah for the west

Gideon Rachman



March 28 2011 -- The war in Libya is about a lot more than Muammer Gaddafi. Its outcome will reverberate around the Middle East and will affect international politics for decades. A vital principle is at stake.

The supporters of outside intervention believe that they are battling not just to stop atrocities in Libya itself, but to lay down a marker for the future. They want to show that the age when a dictator could massacre his own citizens is coming to a close. Bernard Henri-Lévy, a French philosopher who played an improbable role as a link between the Libyan rebels and President Nicolas Sarkozy, has said: “What is important in this affair is that the ‘duty to intervene’ has been recognised.” 

Nicholas Kristof, writing in The New York Times, makes a similar point – “World powers have the right and obligation to intervene when a dictator devours his people.” This idea was approved by the UN in 2005 and, according to Mr Kristof, the Libyan intervention is “putting teeth into that fledgling concept.”

It would be nice to believe that the doctrine of a “responsibility to protect”, known colloquially as R2P, now has real bite. With rebel troops advancing swiftly along the Libyan coast, the supporters of the intervention will be feeling cheerful.

But the reality is that the Libyan war is more likely to mark a last hurrah for liberal interventionism than a new dawn. For the brutal truth is that the western powers that are the keenest promoters of the idea will not have the economic strength or the public backing to sustain many more overseas interventions. And the rising economic powers – China, India, Brazil and others – are deeply sceptical about the whole concept. Britain, France and the US all voted in favour of the UN resolution authorising force in Libya. But the fashionable grouping known as the Brics – Brazil, Russia, India and China – all abstained. None of them have much time for Colonel Gaddafi. But countries like China, India and Brazil see little to gain, and much to lose, by risking money, men and influence in foreign interventions. Their instinct is to mind their own business and to concentrate on the long-term goal of building up their own economic strength. A massacre in Libya might be unfortunate, no doubt – but Benghazi is a long way from Beijing or Brasília. 

There are some complications. Germany abstained but, in doing so, placed itself outside the western mainstream. South Africa, which has been invited to the next Brics summit, voted for the Libyan resolution, but then criticised the bombing campaign vociferously.

So the broad picture holds. The established western powers still have a missionary zeal to put the world to rights. The rising powers are much more cautious and egocentric. 

But the western allies are fighting against a background of shrinking resources. The British have just announced big defence cuts and the French are also battling to contain their budget deficit and maintain their welfare state. 

The reluctance of the American military establishment to take on this new commitment has also been palpable. President Barack Obama and his generals know that the age when a US president could simply say that America would do “whatever it takes” is over. Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, has said that the biggest threat to US national security is the budget deficit. In the post-Iraq, post-Afghanistan era, public support for military operations overseas is also limited. 

Of course, if there is a swift and successful conclusion to the Libyan intervention – Col Gaddafi deposed, cheering crowds in Tripoli – then liberal interventionism will get a boost. But success could be just as much of a snare as failure. Each successful intervention will prompt demand for the next one – and there will be no shortage of possible candidates. Indeed that question is already being raised by the sight of the Syrian government shooting its own citizens. Yet, the more demands that are placed on the western powers, the more it will be evident that there is a growing mismatch between ambition and resources. That gap could, one day, be filled if the Brics and other rising powers change their attitudes to liberal interventionism. But there is very little sign of that happening. The Chinese government, with memories of Tiananmen Square in 1989, is deeply wary of the idea that foreigners have the right to intervene to prevent human rights abuses in a sovereign nation. The same goes for the Russians, with their record in Chechnya. India, Brazil and South Africa are democratic countries with no need for a contingency plan to shoot their own citizens. But their colonial histories incline them to take a sceptical view of the motives of western powers that seek to use military power around the world. They are also all emerging powers that are not yet used to thinking globally.  By contrast, Britain and France have maintained the instinct to think globally, without the resources to back it up. Even the US, by far the world’s pre-eminent military power, is signalling strongly that it is losing the will to be the world’s policeman.   In the Victorian age, the British once sang – “We don’t want to fight, but by Jingo if we do/ We’ve got the ships, we’ve got the men, we’ve got the money too.” The Libyan intervention feels like a last reprise of that old tune, rather than a bold statement for a new age. 




Article 4.

NYT

President Obama on Libya

Editorial

March 28, 2011 -- President Obama made the right, albeit belated, decision to join with allies and try to stop Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi from slaughtering thousands of Libyans. But he has been far too slow to explain that decision, or his long-term strategy, to Congress and the American people. On Monday night, the president spoke to the nation and made a strong case for why America needed to intervene in this fight — and why that did not always mean it should intervene in others. Mr. Obama said that the United States had a moral responsibility to stop “violence on a horrific scale,” as well as a unique international mandate and a broad coalition to act with. He said that failure to intervene could also have threatened the peaceful transitions in Egypt and Tunisia, as thousands of Libyan refugees poured across their borders, while other dictators would conclude that “violence is the best strategy to cling to power.” Mr. Obama could report encouraging early progress on the military and diplomatic fronts. Washington and its allies have crippled or destroyed Colonel Qaddafi’s anti-aircraft defenses, peeled his troops back from the city of Benghazi — saving potentially thousands of lives — and allowed rebel forces to retake the offensive. Just as encouragingly, this military effort that was galvanized internationally — the United Nations Security Council authorized “all necessary measures” to protect civilians in Libya — will soon be run internationally. Last weekend, the United States handed over responsibility for enforcing the no-flight zone to NATO. And the alliance is now preparing to take command of the entire mission, with the support of (still too few) Arab nations. To his credit, Mr. Obama did not sugarcoat the difficulties ahead. While he suggested that his goal, ultimately, is to see Colonel Qaddafi gone, he also said that the air war was unlikely to accomplish that by itself. Most important, he vowed that there would be no American ground troops in this fight. “If we tried to overthrow Qaddafi by force,” he said, “our coalition would splinter.” He said “regime change” in Iraq took eight years and cost thousands of American and Iraqi lives. “That is not something we can afford to repeat in Libya.” Instead, he said the United States and its allies would work to increase the diplomatic and military pressure on Colonel Qaddafi and his cronies. A meeting on Tuesday with allies and members of the Libyan opposition is supposed to develop that strategy along with ways to help the rebels build alternate, and we hope humane and competent, governing structures. That needs to start quickly. To hold their ground and protect endangered civilians, let alone advance, the rebels will likely need air support for quite some time. Mr. Obama was right not to promise a swift end to the air campaign. At the same time, he should not overestimate the patience of the American people or the weariness of the overstretched military. And as Washington reduces its military role, others, inside and outside NATO, will need to increase theirs. Within NATO, unenthusiastic partners like Germany and Turkey need to at least stay out of the way even if they continue to stand aside from the fighting. 

The president made the right choice to act, but this is a war of choice, not necessity. Presidents should not commit the military to battle without consulting Congress and explaining their reasons to the American people. Fortunately, initial coalition military operations have gone well. Unfortunately, it is the nature of war that they will not always go well. Mr. Obama needs to work with Congress and keep the public fully informed. On Monday, he made an overdue start on that. 


 


Article 5.

The Daily Star   

Egypt's new Constitution: an update

Nathan Brown 


March 29, 2011  -- The March 19 vote in favor of constitutional amendments in Egypt provides a boost to the military-led transition process and its vigorous electoral schedule. 

The voter turnout was impressive by Egyptian standards – 41 percent of eligible voters, at least double the turnout in any previous national election or referendum – and the victory was overwhelming at 77 percent of voters. But opponents attracted enough votes to make the outcome seem less like the predictable landslides of the authoritarian order. Those who objected to the content of the amendments and, more forcefully, to the process by which they were written and the political sequence they implied marshaled forceful arguments, campaigned hard, and then lost. 

As a consequence, Egypt’s transition process will likely rush forward. What are the next steps? The basic sequence of events is clear, but the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) has not revealed many of the details. Nor has it shared decision-making power over the sequence and rules in any serious way.

The amended articles – most of them governing presidential and parliamentary elections – are now clearly in effect. But the rest of Egypt’s Constitution remains suspended. Egypt’s military rulers have suggested that they will very shortly issue a declaration indicating how authority will be exercised while Egypt’s Parliament and president are elected, which parts of the 1971 Constitution will be brought back into effect, and what their own role will be.

The committee that drafted the amendments also prepared amendments to various laws in order to bring them into conformance with the new provisions. However, announcement of the changes was postponed until after the referendum. The SCAF is expected to issue those laws, which will likely be designed to make elections freer and fairer, by decree. The SCAF has suggested that it will change the law on political parties, making it much easier for new parties to register. The Muslim Brotherhood is one of the many groups that would likely take advantage of such a change. The SCAF might also move from the current electoral system of individual parliamentary districts to a proportional representation system in which at least some of the seats would be allocated by a party’s share of the national vote instead of giving all of them to the winning candidates in each district. But if the SCAF is planning on such a move, it has not tipped its hand.

The SCAF has also suggested that parliamentary elections will be held before presidential elections. Last week, one of its members argued forcefully that attempts to reverse the sequence and have the president elected first (as some have suggested would be preferable because parliamentary elections will be much more complicated than presidential elections) might simply deliver another dictator. But the generals have also suggested that they may push parliamentary elections back from May or June (when they originally suggested they might be held) until September. This is likely a response to those who claim that Egypt’s party system is simply not sufficiently organized for elections in two or three months.

The SCAF initially suggested that it might hold the presidential election in the late summer or early fall; if parliamentary elections are postponed until September, then the presidential election might be pushed back until the end of the year.

Under new nomination procedures contained in the constitutional amendments, a party that gains at least a single seat in the upcoming parliamentary elections will be able to nominate a candidate. (If the Muslim Brotherhood is able to form a party and does gain seats, it has said it will not run its own candidate this time but it might still throw its weight behind one of the candidates who is running.) Independent candidates can get on the ballot either by getting a certain number of endorsements by parliamentary deputies or gathering signatures (30,000) from eligible voters. 

Already some candidates have announced they will run. Most prominent include the following: Amr Moussa, the former foreign minister and current secretary-general of the Arab League. While popular for his Arab nationalist stances, he will have to overcome his association with the past regime, which has already emerged as a major issue in his campaign. 

There is also Mohamed ElBaradei, the former director of the International Atomic Energy Agency and Nobel Prize winner. While respected for his clear articulation of liberal political stances and courage in openly criticizing the Mubarak regime, he will have to overcome a reputation for having an aloof and overly cerebral style. In addition, many Egyptians complain that he has spent (and continues to spend) too much time outside the country to be an appropriate candidate.

Another candidate is Hisham al-Bastawisi, the leader of a group of judges who confronted the Mubarak regime over the last decade. Al-Bastawisi is, like ElBaradei, widely respected but does not appear to be a natural politician.

There is also Ayman Nour, founder of Al-Ghad Party. Nour came in a distant second to former President Hosni Mubarak in 2005 and spent the subsequent four years in prison on politically motivated charges. Known as a born politician and an effective campaigner, and admired for his uncompromising opposition to Mubarak, Nour nonetheless enjoys less of a national reputation than Moussa and ElBaradei.

And there is Hamdeen Sabahi, the founder of the Karama Party, a breakaway from the Nasserist Party that has long sought official licensing. Sabahi, like Nour, has been a key organizer within the opposition and is a gifted politician, but enjoys less widespread popularity than other candidates.

After the new Parliament and president are elected, the provisional Constitution allows (and, according to a reading endorsed by a SCAF member, actually requires) a constituent assembly to be selected to draft an entirely new Constitution. While the opponents to the amendments wished to have this done as the first rather than the last step, they will ultimately get their wish for an entirely new document. 



Nathan Brown is a professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University and a nonresident senior scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.










Article 6.

NYT

Arabs Will Be Free

Roger Cohen



March 28, 2011 -- Three Middle Eastern countries have been conspicuous for their stability in the storm. They are Turkey, Lebanon and Israel. An odd mix, you might say, but they have in common that they are places where people vote. 

Democracy is a messy all-or-nothing business. That’s why I love it. You can no more be a little bit democratic than a little bit pregnant. 

Yes, citizens go to the polls in Turkey, Lebanon and Israel and no dictator gets 99.3 percent of the vote. They are lands of opportunity where money is being made and where facile generalizations, for all their popularity, miss the point. Turkey has not turned Islamist, Lebanon is not in the hands of Hezbollah, and Israel is still an open society. 

All three countries, of course, are also wracked by division and imperfection; but then two great merits of democracy are that it finesses division and does not aspire to perfection. 

Speaking of Hezbollah, remember all that alarm a couple of months back when a Hezbollah-backed businessman, Najib Mikati, emerged as prime minister? After that, Lebanon introduced the Libyan no-fly-zone resolution at the United Nations — a rare, if little noted, example of the United States and a Hezbollah-supported government in sync. 

Talk to Hezbollah: That’s obvious. It’s no terrorizing monolith. Mikati is struggling with the give-and-take of Lebanese politics. Life goes on in the freewheeling way that has long drawn repressed, frustrated Arabs to Beirut. 

Hezbollah is a political party with a militia. That’s a big problem. Israel’s ultra-Orthodox Shas party has an outsized influence over Israel because of coalition politics. That’s a problem. The Muslim Brotherhood will loom large in a free Egypt because it has an organizational head start. That may be a problem. Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party is a brilliant political machine with a ruthless bent. That’s a problem, too. 

These are problems of different sizes. But give me all these problems so long as they present themselves within open (or opening) systems. They are far preferable to the cowed conformity common to the terrorized societies of the now doomed Arab Jurassic Park, where despots do their worst. 

It’s over: Enough of the nameless graves that whisper of horror, enough of the 20th-century police states in the 21st-century. Yes, it’s over for Ben Ali and for Mubarak. It’s over for Qaddafi, yes it is. How far it’s over for the other Arab despots and autocrats, whether of the oxymoronic “republics” or the royals, will depend on how far they can get out in front of their citizens’ demand to be heard. 

You see, you can’t do Hama any more. You can’t do the Iraqi marshes. Perhaps you can kill dozens, but not tens of thousands. These despots relied on the limitlessness of their terror. It had to be as absolute as their contempt for the law. 

But now people know. They communicate through the clampdowns. They are Facebook-nimble. The despots gaze into their gilded mirrors and, to their horror, see not themselves but the people who will be silenced no longer. They wonder then if their own myriad agents can be trusted. They are caught in their own web. They flail; they have gone too far to turn back but cannot go forward. 

Bashar al-Assad, the embattled Syrian president, was about to say something Sunday, before deciding not to. He was trained in west London as an eye doctor. He’d better stop thinking Hama — where his father murdered at least 10,000 — and start thinking Hammersmith. 

Questions swirl. Who are the Libyan rebels? Who are the angry of Latakia? The Arab transitions will be long and bumpy — like those that brought representative government to Latin America and Central Europe and wide swathes of Asia — but now that fear has been overcome, they are irreversible. 

Here’s who the protesters are: people like Asmaa Mahfouz, 26, the Egyptian woman who on Jan. 18 made a video urging citizens to go to Tahrir Square on Jan. 25 — the demonstration that would start the revolution. She said then: “We’ll go down and demand our rights, our fundamental human rights. I won’t even talk about any political rights. We just want our human rights and nothing else.” And she said people “don’t have to come to Tahrir Square, just go down anywhere and say it, that we are free human beings.” And: “This is enough!” 

People are being born throughout the Middle East. They are discovering their capacity to change things, their inner “Basta!” That’s how the Arab spring began on Dec. 17 in the little town of Sidi Bouzid in Tunisia — with a fruit peddler’s “enough” to humiliation. In my end is my beginning. 

Three months later the genie is not only out of the bottle, it’s shattered the bottle. I said of Libya in an earlier column: Be ruthless or stay out. So now the West is in, be ruthless. Arm the resurgent rebels. Incapacitate Qaddafi. Do everything short of putting troops on the ground. Qaddafi, as President Obama has said, “must leave.” So that Libya can be an Arab country that is imperfect but open. 






Article 7.

The Daily Star   

The West still beats the rest, but it may no longer be best

Robert Skidelsky 


March 29, 2011  -- History has no final verdicts. Major shifts in events and power bring about new subjects for discussion and new interpretations.

Fifty years ago, as decolonization accelerated, no one had a good word to say for imperialism. It was regarded as unambiguously bad, both by ex-imperialists and by their liberated subjects. Schoolchildren were taught about the horrors of colonialism, how it exploited conquered peoples. There was little mention, if any, of imperialism’s benefits.

Then, in the 1980s, a revisionist history came along. It wasn’t just that distance lends a certain enchantment to any view. The West – mainly the Anglo-American part of it – had recovered some of its pride and nerve under U.S. President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. And there was the growing evidence of post-colonial regimes’ failure, violence and corruption, especially in Africa.

But the decisive event for the revisionists was the collapse of the Soviet empire, which not only left the United States top dog globally, but also seemed, to the more philosophically minded, to vindicate Western civilization and values against all other civilizations and values. With the European Union extending its frontiers to embrace many ex-communist states, the West became again, if briefly, the embodiment of universal reason, obliged and equipped to spread its values to the still-benighted parts of the world. Francis Fukuyama’s “The End of History and the Last Man” testified to this sense of triumph and historical duty.

Such a conjuncture set the stage for a new wave of imperialism (though the reluctance to use the word remained). In doing so, it was bound to affect interpretations of the old imperialism, which was now extolled for spreading economic progress, the rule of law, and science and technology to countries that would never have benefited from them otherwise.

Foremost among the new generation of revisionist historians was Niall Ferguson of Harvard University, whose television series, based on his new book “Civilization: The West and the Rest,” has just started showing in Britain. In its first episode, Ferguson appears amid the splendid monuments of China’s Ming Dynasty, which, in the 15th century, was undoubtedly the greatest civilization of the day, with its naval expeditions reaching the coasts of Africa. After that, it was all downhill for China (and “the rest”) and all uphill for the West.

Ferguson snazzily summarizes the reasons for this reversal in six “killer apps:” competition, science, property rights, medicine, the consumer society and the work ethic. Against such tools – unique products of Western civilization – the rest had no chance. From such a perspective, imperialism, old and new, has been a beneficent influence, because it has been the means of spreading these “apps” to the rest of the world, thereby enabling them to enjoy the fruits of progress hitherto confined to a few Western countries.

Understandably, this thesis has not met with universal approbation. The historian Alex von Tunzelmann accused Ferguson of leaving out all of imperialism’s nasty bits: the Black War in Australia, the German genocide in Namibia, the Belgian exterminations in the Congo, the Amritsar Massacre, the Bengal Famine, the Irish potato famine, and much else.

But that is the weakest line of attack. Edward Gibbon once described history as being little better than a record of the “crimes, follies and misfortunes of mankind.” Imperialism certainly added its quota to these. But the question is whether it also provided, through Hegel’s “cunning of reason,” the means to escape from them. Even Marx justified British rule in India on these grounds. Ferguson, too, can make a sound argument for such a proposition.

The most serious weakness in Ferguson’s presentation is his lack of sympathy for the civilizations dismissed as “the rest,” which also points to the most serious limitation of the revisionist case. The “triumph of the West” that followed the collapse of communism in Europe was clearly not the “end of history.” As Ferguson must know, the main topic of discussion in international affairs nowadays concerns the “rise” of China, and more generally Asia, as well as the stirring of Islam.

Of course, the Chinese may prefer to talk about “restoration” rather than “rise,” and point to a “harmonious” pluralism of the future. But “rise” is how most people think of China’s recent history, and in history the rise of some is usually associated with the decline of others. In other words, we may be reverting to that cyclical pattern that historians assumed to be axiomatic before the seemingly irreversible rise of the West implanted in them a view of linear progress toward greater reason and freedom.

Europe is plainly in decline, politically and culturally, though most Europeans, blinded by their high living standards and the pretensions of their impotent statesmen, are happy to dress this up as progress. Chinese savings are underwriting much of the American civilizing mission that Ferguson applauds. The pattern seems clear: the West is losing dynamism, and the rest are gaining it.

The remainder of this century will show how this shift plays out. For the moment, most of us have lost the historical plot. It is possible, for example, to imagine a “Western world” (one that applies Ferguson’s “killer apps”) in which the actual West is no longer the dominant factor: America will simply pass the torch to China, as Britain once did to America.

But it seems to me extremely unlikely that China, India and “the rest” will simply take over Western values wholesale, for this would amount to renouncing any value in their own civilizations. Some syntheses and accommodations between the West and the rest will inevitably accompany the shift in power and wealth from the former to the latter. The only question is whether the process will be peaceful.



Robert Skidelsky, a member of the British House of Lords, is a professor emeritus of political economy at Warwick University.


Article 8.

Wall Street Journal

Norway to Jews: You're Not Welcome Here 

Alan M. Dershowitz 



MARCH 29, 2011 -- I recently completed a tour of Norwegian universities, where I spoke about international law as applied to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But the tour nearly never happened. 

Its sponsor, a Norwegian pro-Israel group, offered to have me lecture without any charge to the three major universities. Norwegian universities generally jump at any opportunity to invite lecturers from elsewhere. When my Harvard colleague Stephen Walt, co-author of ""The Israel Lobby,"" came to Norway, he was immediately invited to present a lecture at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim. Likewise with Ilan Pappe, a demonizer of Israel who teaches at Oxford.

My hosts expected, therefore, that their offer to have me present a different academic perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would be eagerly accepted. I have written half a dozen books on the subject presenting a centrist view in support of the two-state solution. But the universities refused. 

The dean of the law faculty at Bergen University said he would be ""honored"" to have me present a lecture ""on the O.J. Simpson case,"" as long as I was willing to promise not to mention Israel. An administrator at the Trondheim school said that Israel was too ""controversial."" 

The University of Oslo simply said ""no"" without offering an excuse. That led one journalist to wonder whether the Norwegian universities believe that I am ""not entirely house-trained.""

Only once before have I been prevented from lecturing at universities in a country. The other country was Apartheid South Africa.

Despite the faculties' refusals to invite me, I delivered three lectures to packed auditoriums at the invitation of student groups. I received sustained applause both before and after the talks. 

It was then that I realized why all this happened. At all of the Norwegian universities, there have been efforts to enact academic and cultural boycotts of Jewish Israeli academics. This boycott is directed against Israel's ""occupation"" of Palestinian land—but the occupation that the boycott supporters have in mind is not of the West Bank but rather of Israel itself. Here is the first line of their petition: ""Since 1948 the state of Israel has occupied Palestinian land . . ."" 

The administrations of the universities have refused to go along with this form of collective punishment of all Israeli academics, so the formal demand for a boycott failed. But in practice it exists. Jewish pro-Israel speakers are subject to a de facto boycott. 

The first boycott signatory was Trond Adresen, a professor at Trondheim. About Jews, he has written: ""There is something immensely self-satisfied and self-centered at the tribal mentality that is so prevalent among Jews. . . . [They] as a whole, are characterized by this mentality. . . . It is no less legitimate to say such a thing about Jews in 2008-2009 than it was to make the same point about the Germans around 1938.""

This line of talk—directed at Jews, not Israel—is apparently acceptable among many in Norway's elite. Consider former Prime Minister Kare Willock's reaction to President Obama's selection of Rahm Emanuel as his first chief of staff: ""It does not look too promising, he has chosen a chief of staff who is Jewish."" Mr. Willock didn't know anything about Mr. Emanuel's views—he based his criticism on the sole fact that Mr. Emanuel is a Jew. Perhaps unsurprisingly, fewer than 1,000 Jews live in Norway today. 

The country's foreign minister recently wrote an article justifying his contacts with Hamas. He said that the essential philosophy of Norway is ""dialogue."" That dialogue, it turns out, is one-sided. Hamas and its supporters are invited into the dialogue, but supporters of Israel are excluded by an implicit, yet very real, boycott against pro-Israel views. 



Mr. Dershowitz is a law professor at Harvard. His latest novel is ""The Trials of Zion"" (Grand Central Publishing, 2010). 





























29













"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026369.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 1/23/2016 3:28:09 PM
To: Kathy Ruemm ler
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

My memory is a friend killer - I stopped talking to clinton when he swore, with whole hearted conviction to
me , that he had done something, , he had forgotten that he also swore the exact opposite to me only weeks
before. .

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Kathy Ruemmler a wrote:

He obviously said something to you yesterday that was disturbing, and you don't want to tell me. Just tell me -
- I can take it. I promise.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 23, 2016, at 9:22 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

I was wrong

On Saturday, January 23, 2016, Kathy Ruemmler (> wrote:

I will just say I told you so. Not to sound overly dramatic, but he is very close to being a psychopath -- he has
no conscience. It's scary.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 23, 2016, at 8:40 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

i could never ever verify its authenticity. so- yes .

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Kathy Ruemmler Se wrote:

Meaning I win the bet that I will never receive an apology and acknowledgment of acceptance of
responsibility?

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:58 AM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

You were right and I was wrong. Humble pie, crow , or my own words is what i get to eattoday. your
choice

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Kathy Ruemmler ~ wrote:

What part do you find disturbing? Do you think he is losing it?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2016, at 6:21 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

talking to macgiver, disturbs me, and that takes a lot

please note

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026369
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 2/25/2018 10:33:32 PM

To: Kathy Ruemmler (i
Subject: Re:

Yup

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:30 PM Kathy Ruemmler <> wrote:
Barf.

On Feb 25, 2018, at 5:29 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

she said he wants her to do wife like things. ugh

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <q wrote:
Uh oh — You dimed out

What is Benjamin upset about?

On Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

onlyu slightly. ariane said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Kathy Ruemmler > wrote:

While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)
Are you feeling better today?

On Feb 25, 2018, at 4:17 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Steve Bannon Feb 24 (1 day ago)

=

michael-flynn-trump-423437

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023532.txt,"16

done something bold: Acknowledge that the age of Jewish settlement
is over. He did mention, fleetingly, that certain settlements would be
set adrift in a theoretical peace deal. But he seemed unaware that he
was delivering a speech that could easily have been given 10 years
ago.

It is not 10 years ago. Israel is now 10 years closer to achieving full
pariah status. And -- in part because the Palestinians lack the patience
to pursue a strategy of gradual, irreversible entanglement -- a moment
of truth for Israel is rapidly approaching.

UN Vote

The Palestinians are seeking a UN vote in September on
independence. They will prevail in the General Assembly, though not
in the Security Council. President Barack Obama, with whom
Netanyahu just picked a fight, will have to spend a good amount of
political capital to stymie the Palestinian campaign, even though he
appears to have nothing but contempt for Netanyahu’s lack of vision.
But American opposition to this unilateral declaration will be in
many ways immaterial. Israel will soon enough be seen by most of
the world as the occupier not of disputed territory but of a foreign
country. The Palestinians will wake up to find that a General
Assembly vote did not, in fact, give them true independence. And
then there will be an explosion.

The Palestinians who are watching Yemenis, Libyans and Syrians
fighting for their freedom will soon be inspired to once again take up
their own fight.

Existential Threats

Netanyahu, who understands the existential threat posed by Iran, does
not seem to understand the nature of this other existential threat. His
five predecessors as prime minister -- including Ariel Sharon, whose
heart did not bleed for Palestinians -- understood it. President Obama
understands it, too.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023532
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026720.txt,"Due to the lower capitalisation of local stock and
bond markets, economic performance in DM Low
FME countries is relatively less vulnerable to financial
shocks than in DM High FME markets, giving Low FME
central banks greater freedom to invest in higher risk
asset classes. Furthermore, whereas most High FME
central banks self-assess ‘ample’ reserves adequacy,
the majority of Low FME central bank respondents
describe reserve levels as ‘sufficient’, and are
therefore more likely to seek higher returns through
the investment tranche to improve their long-term
reserves adequacy position (figure 31).

Typically, emerging market central banks have the
lowest levels of reserves adequacy due in large part to
greater vulnerability to foreign shocks. Indeed, certain
emerging market central banks with a currency peg
noted that falling commodity prices had created
pressure on the local currency, causing a drawdown
of foreign reserves to maintain the peg. Countries
with more flexible exchange rate arrangements are
instead seeking greater exposure to risk asset classes
to generate positive returns to preserve capital and
maintain reserves adequacy.

Fig 31. Investment tranche usage (% citations) m EM
Mi DM Low FME
DM High FME

Sample comprises of central banks only.
Sample: DM High FME=6, DM Low FME=6 and EM=22. Note low sample.
DM High FME=High financial market dependency. DM Low FME=Low financial market dependency.

40

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026720
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033349.txt,"Read on »

The real reason Donald Trump is pushing this ‘Democrats hate
Jews’ nonsense

Bill Palmer

The post The real reason Donald Trump is pushing this ‘Democrats hate Jews’
nonsense appeared first on Palmer Report.

Read on »

William Barr may yet surprise us
Shirley Kennedy

The post William Barr may yet surprise us appeared first on Palmer Report.

Read on »

Donald Trump's deafening silence about the Mueller report speaks
volumes

Bill Palmer

The post Donald Trump’s deafening silence about the Mueller report speaks
volumes appeared first on Palmer Report.

Read on »

Three ways we know more indictments in Robert Mueller’s
investigation are still coming from other prosecutors

Bill Palmer

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033349
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016731.txt,"OGE Form 278¢ (March 2014)
Instructions for Part 7
Note: This is a public form. Do not include account numbers, street addresses, or family member names. See instructions for required information.

Filer's Name

Donald J. Trump 33 of 42

Part 7: Transactions

2 re aes ees CC ae
43 |aMG MG PICTET INTLZ Sale $1,001 - $15,000

*S|rantonsstonreaumene | SS |stats, | staot-stsc00
*Ssunnesmsciearemoecrnn |S S| aetmamas | t.001-8 18000
*lauanesusciearewoereono |S Stearman | scot cisco
sunesmsciewremoenruno | S| armani | st.00t-st5.000
PIMCO UNCONSTRAINED BOND-INS :
BLACKROCK HIGH YIELD PORTFOLIO
Lowswmranrmunianos —_unoscor |S | etenan | t.cot-sis.ooo
pFamiytrustze

* |.P. Morgan is the sole Trustee. Donald J. Trump retains an income interest only in the Family Trusts and has no investment decision authority.

Ea
J

wa] Ww Ln | ta Ww | uA
a |] Ss = | tw wie

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016731
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015980.txt,"290 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?

is 1900 by 1000 pixels with 32 bits of color depth and 100 frames per
second. This is a great deal better — if you enjoy watching sport or nature
documentaries, the additional resolution is amazing. This still falls far
short of reality. An IMAX theatre gives a wrap-around image of about
10,000 by 7,000 pixels and comes closer to the average resolution of the
human eye, estimated at about 30,000 by 20,000 pixels. But the eye cheats.
It concentrates the rods and cones in the central portion of the retina.
Although IMAX achieves the average pixel density of your eye, it comes
nowhere near the peak density which is nearly 10,000 times greater.

For a truly equivalent experience, we would need about 320 million
pixels per eye at a frame rate of 120 frames per second, allowing us full
stereo synthesis. At this speed and resolution, we are matching the visual
acuity of the eye and should be able to fool it completely. But there is
one more problem to overcome: The image is not interactive. Move your
head in the real world and the image will change. The objects in the
foreground will vary their position in relation to the background, so-
called motion parallax. Try it now, move your head and you will see that
the book, or screen you are reading moves in relation to the background.
In a simple digitized 3D image this will not happen. You will have a 3D
image but you will not have a real image, a light field.

To create a real image you need to view a hologram or use head-
tracking technology. A hologram records the light waves given off by
an object in multiple directions rather than just the intensity of the light
striking the camera through a single focal point. When you shine a laser
back through the hologram, it regenerates the light waves as they would
have originally come from the object. That light can be viewed from
different directions, giving the impression of three dimensions rather
than a mere two-dimensional photograph. There is often a limitation in
viewing angle because the original photographic plate must wrap all the
way around an object to capture the full 3D light field, but the illusion is
very convincing.

A more effective way to create a real experience — and one with no
restriction on viewing angle — is to construct the image in a computer
and track the movement of your head. The computer can create the
two-dimensional images each eye would see if the scene were truly
three-dimensional. Computer software resolves motion parallax and a
host of other elements, but to do so the computer must understand a
model of the world so it can calculate how the scene would look from a
particular angle and in the appropriate lighting. Some recent games such
as Activision's ‘Call of Duty’ do this, and the experience is compelling.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015980
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031080.txt,"Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very
strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the
time to respond.

-R

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lawrence Krauss qq wrote:

jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were
underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such
circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage
of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine
his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for
something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I
fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with
Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peoplel
know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of.. I know it is not politically correct to say that,
because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of
the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call,
and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily.

On Apr 6, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Rebecca Watson wrote:

Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against
Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or
rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is
possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with
underage girls in his private life.

I'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you
want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.

-R

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Lawrence Krauss qq wrote:
yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a
thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who
have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..

why are you asking?

On Apr 6, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Rebecca Watson wrote:

Dear Professor Krauss,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031080
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032731.txt,"From: HS

Sent: 3/7/2018 9:51:44 AM

To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
cc: lhsoffice

Subject: What’s up in trump World?

Importance: — High

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office 1 ii

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032731
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027358.txt,"Time: 07/28/18 03:30:15 AM (554466615)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: CEB82C26-72D3-48B3-939A-22B1D8360C18

Message: I balance by getting there on the ground

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 07/28/18 03:33:42 AM (554466822)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 20C6DD56-E5CD-4300-93E8-04D87B8B94C3

Message: Agreed, do you do some Hannity from Europe, or back and forth

Sender: |

Time: 07/28/18 04:05:32 AM (554468732)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 70510DBB-BA7D-498F-850B-B72518EB4F87

Message: I can do Hannity from Europe

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 07/28/18 05:11:15 AM (554472675)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

r

GUID: E202F89E-F90A-4AC7-B932-931DA30EB2A54

Message: Its not what I understand. I might wonder if it is possible to do two ground
games simultaneously . Telling some to ring doorbells and get out the vote while you
are in Europe should be carefully considered.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 07/28/18 05:57:50 AM (554475470)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: D32E0D08-430F-4577-9466-CO090BD53349

Gl

Message: Note, I spoke with the president of Ethiopia and Eritrea , they have agreed
not to do any more work with the Chinese. ! as they now understand the trick. In
fact there is a possiblitiy of the two countries becoming one.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027358
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015758.txt,"68 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?

itself away if all you have to go on are electrical readings. (I dare say the
cat would make its displeasure know if left in there for any time.) The
contents are, therefore, said to be black box equivalent.

The reason for teaching engineers about black boxes is to help them
understand how to simplify things. We could construct option four, with
a cat and some food, but it would cost a great deal of money. Option 1 is
functionally identical from an electrical point of view, but for a fraction
of the cost. Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs were so successful when they
started Apple because Wozniak was brilliant at simplifying logic circuits.
He could take a design with thirty chips and come back with a black box
equivalent solution using only five. It was a fraction of the cost and far
more reliable.

Scientists put great store in black box equivalence because of
a principle called Occam’s Razor. William of Occam was an English
Franciscan friar living in the fourteenth century. He proposed the idea
of minimal explanation. It states that, ‘among competing hypotheses,
the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions should be selected? When
trying to explain the workings of a black box, the more complicated
inner workings should be discarded, as they have no externally verifiable
effect over the simpler mechanism. Our extraneous animal must be
eliminated! Sorry.

Ironically, given his calling, Occam’s Razor is sometimes wheeled
out as a disproof of the existence of God. Surely God is a complication
unnecessary to the explanation of our Universe. The argument is
illustrated beautifully in Carl Sagan’s book Contact and the film of the
same name. God gets the last laugh in Sagan’s book when the difficulty
with Occam’s Razor is brought into sharp focus. Occam's Razor contains
an inherent paradox. At any moment in time we only have evidence to
support the simplest of explanations, yet we know many of these simple
explanations are incomplete. We regularly discover new phenomenon —
dark matter and dark energy being some recent examples. If we stopped
discovering new things, Occam's Razor would be a good way to simplify
our thoughts. Occam’s Razor is a useful intellectual tool to prevent us
over complicating explanations, but there will often be explanations that
are correct, but for which there is not yet any observed effect.

If we go back to our black box example, we see the flaw in concluding
the boxes are identical from examining only their inputs and outputs.
Opening them would clearly show they are not identical! But, how would
this fact reveal itself if they remain closed? The answer is: over time. If
something in the box has memory or understanding, it could present
one set of results for a while and a completely different set of results later.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015758
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025106.txt,"Pardon the formality below - I want to approach your very legitimate questions / concerns in a serious
manner.
Attached and below the same.

Dear Jeffrey:

As requested, the following addresses your two questions / concerns about our proposed Closer To Truth TV
series “The Science of Sleep and Dreams”:

(i) Have there been sufficient breakthroughs in Sleep and Dreams (significantly beyond traditional
understandings) to justify a major TV series?

(11) Even if ‘yes’ to (1), is now the proper time for such a foundational series, or are more years needed for
corroborative studies and further research to solidify the breakthroughs?

In preparing this response, my primary source is Professor Patrick McNamara, Department of Neurology,
Boston University School of Medicine, with whom CTT Producer/Director Peter Getzels and I spoke with at
length today. Patrick is one of the leading sleep and dream researchers (he himself more dreams). More
importantly, he is perhaps the leading chronicler of the field, with many publications (including 26 entries in
related encyclopedias). He is co-editor-in-chief of the “Encyclopedia of Sleep and Dreams” (2012) and

the sole author of the forthcoming “An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Sleep and Dreams” (Cambridge
University Press, 2018), which intends to present the latest science and to become a main textbook for
graduate courses/seminars. Patrick is a CTT contributor and colleague.

When we asked Patrick, his first response — “This is the ideal time to tell the sleep-and-dreams story” — and he
cited (in essence) your two questions, in that (i) the multiple breakthroughs are now sufficiently well
corroborated by numerous independent labs such that a substantial foundation for the new, deeper
understanding of sleep and dreams is now for the first time (over the past few years) confirmed and
established, and (11) there are now interesting application and critical clinical questions to pose, explore and
pursue, such as for the treatment of various mental-related illnesses that have known sleep-related syndromes
(e.g., PTSD and Depression).

To understand the significance of recent breakthroughs, a defining characteristic of sleep and dreams is that
there are two distinct kinds of sleep - REM (rapid-eye-movement) Sleep and NREM (non-rapid-eye-
movement) Sleep. Most dreams are associated with REM sleep (though complex). The eye movement

gives the eponymous name, but a more important designation defines the two stages in terms of brain waves
(electroencephalograph — EEG): REM is Fast-Wave Sleep (similar to the waking state) and NREM Sleep is
Slow-Wave Sleep (very different from the waking state). This difference between REM and NREM sleep has
been known since 1953 (different EEGs since 1937), but its deep significance has only been discovered and
confirmed in very recent years (as explained below).

Following are the key areas of breakthrough in sleep and dreams (from Patrick). Patrick states that these are
now reproducible, non-controversial, and well-accepted among experts, although still not appreciated by the
public - hence the high value of our CTT TV series. The organizing idea is why and how are sleep and dreams
essential for normal memory consolidation and bodily health / well-being.

Memory Consolidation. There is a fundamental difference between REM and NREM Sleep for memory
consolidation: REM is for emotional memories, whereas NREM is for declarative and procedural memories.
Hence, understanding and dealing with REM emotional memories can lead to treatment for the many
neuropsychiatric illnesses that have sleep/dream-related disorders or syndromes (Parkinson’s Disease,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025106
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017349.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

She also, according to the government, evaded sales taxes on expensive jewelry in New York
(which has a sales tax) by having the jeweler send empty boxes to Florida (which has no sales
tax). Asa result, she may have saved several thousand dollars, but she spent more than a year in
prison, when she had only a few years left to live and even less time to spend with her dying
husband. By any rational calculus, this is crazy behavior.

Mike Tyson, as the world’s greatest boxer, had a limited career ahead of him but virtually
unlimited access to sex. As with many famous athletes, women were falling all over him, sending
him “audition” tapes, waiting for him wherever he appeared and begging him to have sex with
him. Yet, he agreed to be alone in a hotel room with a young woman he had just met and to risk
being falsely accused of rape — which, in my view, he was — in order to get even more sex. The
result was that he was sentenced to several years in prison near the end of his short career, and
lost almost everything he had worked so hard to acquire. Even he later acknowledged to me that
he was a “schmuck” for risking so much for so little.

In both of these cases, celebrities risked what they had limited amounts of — in Helmsley’s
situation the few remaining years of her life and her time with her husband; in Tyson’s situation
the few remaining years of his career — in order to obtain more of what they had unlimited
amounts of: money and sex. Of course, neither one expected to be convicted for what they did,
but they both engaged in behavior that carried the risk of being deprived of what they had only
limited amounts of. No rationally calculating person, weighing the costs and benefits of taking
such risky actions, would do so. But these celebrities — and many others who have consulted me
— have done just that.

Some of my celebrity clients have also gotten into trouble because they need, or feel entitled to,
immediate gratification without sufficiently considering the longer term implications of their
conduct, not only to themselves and their careers but to their loved ones, friend and associates.
They believe that when the future finally arrives, there will be new quick fixes. And often they
are right. Someone generally manages to clean up the mess they left behind. It requires a
combination of unlikely factors and some bad luck to produce disaster, since most successful
people are good at making problems go away. But even celebrities are subject to the law of
probabilities and eventually — if they persist in their reckless behavior — the statistics will likely
catch up with them.

Why do so many celebrities act so recklessly? Is there something special about being a celebrity
that makes one feel invulnerable to ordinary risks? Are they so accustomed to “getting away with
it” that they weigh costs and benefits differently from ordinary people?

Is there a sense of entitlement? Are there expectations that the rules don’t apply to them? Do
they feel guilty about their “undeserved” success and want to be caught? Do they surround
themselves with groupies who encourage bad behavior and refuse to be truthful with them about
the risks? Are temptations placed so readily before them that they become difficult to resist?

One answer may well be that some of them have been doing it all their lives, starting well before
they were rich and famous. People often have a hard time changing old habits. I know that no

matter how much money I now have, I cannot throw away a tea bag after using it only once. It
drives my family crazy to see soggy tea bags in a cup waiting to be reused, but I simply can’t

262

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017349
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023254.txt,"thought needed to be done, so that you wouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently
find yourself. however ,you chose to defer many of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago.

! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art partnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50
AO timber emails all carried with it a clear warning that you needed to do something re personnel if it
were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.

ONE YEAR AGO
Feb 17 2014 1 wrote:

With regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very
strong inclination is not to be involved at all . It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with
many pitfall many that will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago
that the quality of the people involved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way
before the beginning of my involvement ) I am also aware however of my overarching friendship
obligations of ok, -given all the complexities who else can do it? problem.

Your family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping ,
nitpicking with little direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take
charge Everyone would report to him. Eileen included. He would however work for me. this is not,
by a long shot my first choice as I prefer only being responsible and standing behind my own
personal work ( ie the word DONE will no longer be transmitted to reflect status stated by others )

With no commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as Ihave failed in my attempt in
trying to think through the problem creatively . My organizations handling of the more complex
issues I believe you might find very costly, very ! (however many structures available some risk
sharing, maybe risk caps ,etc ) but would require my teams doing the work , not yours. Ada should
be only a trust, grat administrator. not sure what role you prefer for Eileen as you hired her initially to

oversee investments. whether Rich your controller stays or not, 1s not urgent. having Tom report to a
new person,- is. coordination with Suydam Kathy Gregory, I would suggest limiting to one person.
The increasing public profile needs to be taken into consideration.

TODAY

With your acquiesence , Eileen did not report to Delson ( he acting as a conduit directly to me) , she
continued to provide bad info to both you ( cash flows , stock accts, structures. sales Etc) and me.
and each time with my many annoying calls to you made immediately afterwards that she was g....-y !!
No one was hired to run YOUR office until two months ago , no one was even interviewed and even
now , Brad, a very nice man, 1s not even full time,(crazy ) Hours upon hours of time need to be spent
training him . and his new staff. Eileen followed your instructions. not mine. in fact she continued to
ignore mine saying "" but Leon said ""or"" its on Leon's desk etc"", You would become frustrated
when 1 pointed out each instance. of her obfuscation. originally you were given the clear choice, but
to save money ,you chose not to hire my team . I was hired to do the architecture, you kept your own
team. with Eileen at the head. instructions were given by me, , detailed but ignored by her. ( except in
the instances where I inserted myself and personally had to do the weeks of grunt work
),ex. jpm morgan acct still not in use? That being said, If you do the cold calculation ,starting from
where you were, to where you are currently . you have made a hell ofa deal. -- negotiating down
my original amount requested , calling upon our friendship and suggesting that the Carlyn mess was
partially my fault. (though in that specific example , I had never been asked to do more than merely
provide you the name of the most highly recognized atty in the field, not consulted,nor even asked
again for my guidance along the way. ).I accepted the discount as your friend. ( by the way
suggesting now, that your Tom is now that last word on tax characterization, frankly is a bit much,-).
however - that is all in the past.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023254
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010486.txt,"﻿7TERSON 
I don't see what it adds to the 
estigation had taken place, that 
3ut, at that time, no criminal 
Lirs had been launched. And in 
the rumors of Epstein's dealings 
I. to be just that—rumors. 
his lawyers, his editors, and his 
.in.g odd and disturbing happened 
in Times Square. 
to the office early. He swiped his 
the elevator button, and arrived in 
ion area on the twenty-first floor. 
ct time to review Ward's story. 
n's town house—which is said to 
residence in New York City at the 
amid the flurry of menservants 
and pristine white gloves, you feel 
Leone's private Xa-n.adu,"" she'd writ-
person's home, but a high-walled, 
that seems to have no boundaries. 
.ed not with paintings but with row 
imed eyeballs; these, the owner tells 
nported from England, where they 
:Ts. Next comes a marble foyer, which 
manner of Jean Dubuffet . . . but the 
fisitors who painted it. In any case, 
150 
One of the photographs 
captured on video during the 
Palm Beach Police Department 
search warrant walk-through 
of Epstein's El Brillo Way 
residence (Palm Beach Police 
Department) 
Jeffrey Epstein, Coney Island, 
circa 1969 (Anonymous) 
Epstein's Palm Beach 
property, 358 El Brillo 
Way (0 Chris Bott / 
Splash News / Corbis) 
Jeffrey Epstein's 1969 high school 
yearbook photo (Lafayette High 
School, Brooklyn, New York, 1969) 
Leslie Wexner, photographed 
at his home in New York City, 
1989 (0 Lynn Goldsmith) 
(L to R) Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine 
Maxwell, and Tony Randall, who 
presided over a November 1991 
YIVO Institute event at the Plaza 
Hotel to honor the late Robert 
Maxwell (Marina Garnier) 
(L to R) Deborah 
Blohm, Jeffrey Epstein, 
Ghislaine Maxwell, and 
Gwendolyn Beck attend a 
reception at Mar-a-Lago, 
1995. (Davidoff Studios) 
Jeffrey Epstein, Donald 
Trump, and (newly signed 
Trump Model) Ingrid 
Seynhaeve, attending the 
Victoria's Secret Angels 
party at Laura Belle club 
in New York City on April 
8, 1997 (Marina Gamier) 
txner, photographed 
ne in New York City, 
Lynn Goldsmith) 
(L to R) Deborah 
Blohm, Jeffrey Epstein, 
Ghislaine Maxwell, and 
Gwendolyn Beck attend a 
reception at Mar-a-Lago, 
1995. (Davidoff Studios) 
Virginia Roberts, age 
fifteen; photo reportedly 
taken by Jeffrey Epstein in 
New York City (Virginia 
Roberts Affidavit, US 
District Southern Court of 
Florida) 
(L to R) Prince Andrew, Virginia Roberts, 
and Ghislaine Maxwell; photo reportedly 
taken by Epstein with Roberts's camera 
in Maxwell's London town house. 
Roberts was seventeen years old at this 
time. (Virginia Roberts Affidavit, .US 
District Southern Court of Florida) 
Virginia Roberts, age seventeen; 
photo reportedly taken by 
Jeffrey Epstein at Zorro Ranch, 
his New Mexico property, 
in winter (Virginia Roberts 
Affidavit, US District Southern 
Court of Florida) 
Jeffrey Epstein with Professor 
Alan Dershowitz in Cambridge, 
MA, September 8, 2004 (0 Rich 
Friedman / Corbis) 
On the day the police investigation 
began, Epstein was photographed 
with Ghislaine Maxwell in New York 
City at the 2005 Wall Street concert 
series benefiting Wall Street Rising, 
at Cipriani in New York City, March 
15, 2005. (Joe Shildhorn / Patrick 
McMullen) 
Jeffrey Epstein, photographed 
with Adrianna Ross, attend-
ing the launch of Radar 
magazine held at the Hotel 
QT in New York City, May 
2005 (Neil Rasmus / Patrick-
McMullan.com / Sipa Press) 
2008 Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office 
booking photo of Jeffrey Epstein (Palm 
Beach County Sheriff's Office) 
The Stockade, where Epstein 
served his sentence, photogra 
here in 2006, was located at 6/ 
, Fairgrounds Road in West Palm 
Beach, Florida. At the time, it 
used as a minimum- and mediu 
security facility housing wom 
. juveniles, as well as male loins 
on a work-release program. 
Aerial Photos) 
igation 
,raphed 
:w York 
concert 
Rising, 
, March 
'Patrick 
Mullen) 
Jeffrey Epstein, photographed 
with Adrianna Ross, attend-
ing the launch of Radar 
magazine held at the Hotel 
QT in New York City, May 
2005 (Neil Rasmus / Patrick-
McMullan.com / Sipa Press) 
Ers Office 
:in (Palm 
Ts Office) 
The Stockade, where Epstein 
I served his sentence, photograph 
here in 2006, was located at 673 
Fairgrounds Road in West Palm 
Beach, Florida. At the time, it vi 
used as a minimum- and media 
I security facility housing women 
juveniles, as well as male ininat 
on a work-release program. (s„ 
likki Aerial Photos) 
Epstein pleaded guilty to state 
solicitation charges and served — 
thirteen months of an eighteen-
month sentence, with liberal 
work-release privileges, in a 
solitary cell at the Palm Beach 
County Stockade similar to the 
one pictured here. (Courtesy 
CDC Special Management, Palm 
Beach Sheriffs Office) 
'J, 
Epstein and lawyer at the West 
Palm Beach courthouse in June 
2008 to enter a plea nearly two 
years after being charged (Uma 
Sanghvi / The Palm Beach Post / 
ZUMAPRESS.com) 
Cr.pleara. of L. Le/rt.,. trn, ',ore eer 
Jeffrey Epstein's entry in 
the National Sex Offender 
Registry (National Sex 11111=1,=====m1Immin 
Offender Registry) 11.1101.111111.01======= 
rt.  
Itnnt 
VA= 
/et 
Othalrer./Ir ani/feet 
Ovarv.u. 
nerar. Am err..., 
erer,-,e. tar.< h /en • 
ITT/. MYL.V. 
Can Lae A.. Mr 11 
Mee *VArsre/ 
41, rLa: 
Epstein's Little Saint James 
island, U.S. Virgin Islands: a 
, privately owned cay (nicknamed 
.41 Little Saint Jeffs) whose owner 
locals affectionately refer to 
as Richie Rich (0 Chris Bott / 
Splash News / Corbis) 
Epstein's Gulfstream, 
photographed on Little 
Saint James island in 
the U.S. Virgin Islands, 
January 2015 (0 Chris 
Bott / Splash News / Corbis) 
Epstein's longtime pilot, Larry Visoski 
was at the controls as Epstein's 
Gulfstream left Teterboro Airport in 
New Jersey, January 2016. Jae Donne 
When Prince Andrew and Epstein were seen 
strolling together together through New York's Central --,-:-:, 
—.. 
Park in 2011, shortly after Epstein's release 
7`..-
-, 
from jail, the duke was forced to quit his .""-:::"" - role as as the British government's global trade 
envoy. Uae Donnelly / News of the World) 
if! 
Stephen Hawking, photographed 
in March 2006 aboard an Atlantis 
submarine that was custom-fitted 
by Epstein to accommodate his 
wheelchair. Hawking was attending 
the conference ""Confronting Gra‘iiri 
""a workshop to explore fundamental 
questions in physics and cosinoto y. 
sponsored by the J. Epstein Vi 
Foundation and the Center for 
Education and Research in Cosmc) 
and Astrophysics (CERCA) at C 
Western Reserve University, al. 
Carlton, St. Thomas, USVI. 
CERCA, Case Western University 
, Taglizt 
avies 
Yor 
Ball. 
Epstein's longtime pilot, Larry Visoski, 
was at the controls as Epstein's 
Gulfstream left Teterboro Airport in 
New Jersey, January 2016. (fete Donnelly) 
:e seen 
4 ,60 
2entral 
release 
pit his - 
L1 trade 
World) 
Stephen Hawking, photographed 
in March 2006 aboard an Atlantis 
submarine that was custom-fitted 
by Epstein to accommodate his 
wheelchair. Hawking was attending 
the conference ""Confronting GravitY: 
""a workshop to explore fundamental 
questions in physics and cosmologY. 
sponsored by the J. Epstein VI 
Foundation and the Center for 
Education and Research in Cosmkg 
and Astrophysics (CERCA) at Case, 
Western Reserve University, at the A.! - 
Carlton, St. Thomas, USVI. (Coot 
CERCA, Case Western Unive1510 
A framed photo of Florida governor 
Charlie Crist and Scott Rothstein in 
Rothstein's office in Fort Lauderdale, 
autographed by Charlie Crist: Scott—
You are amazing! Charlie Crist 
(Canine Jean © Sun Sentinel / ZUMA-
PRESS . com) 
Epstein, a longtime benefactor, with 
an unidentified friend, attended the 
IN 2014 New York Academy of Art's 
Tribeca Ball, presented by Van Cleef 
& Arpels, at the New York Academy 
of Art on April 7, 2014, in New York 
City. (Billy Farrell / BFAnyc.com) 
Epstein's current residence, the 
storied building formerly known 
as the Herbert N. Straus Mansion, 
on East 71st Street just off Central 
Park, was acquired by Leslie 
Wexner in 1989. (Laura Hanifin) 
Nadia Marcinkova, Michele 
Tagliani, Sarah Kellen, and Teala 
Davies, photographed at the New 
York Academy of Art's Tribeca 
Ball, April 14, 2004 (Rob Rich / 
SocietyAllure.com) 
Sarah (formerly Kellen/ 
Kensington) and husband, 
NASCAR driver Brian Vickers, 
arrive on the red carpet at the 141st 
running of the Kentucky Derby 
at Churchill Downs in Louisville, 
Kentucky. (Jeff Moreland / Icon 
FZ Sportswire via AP Images) 
Nadia Marcinkova and Larry 
Visoski, Epstein's personal 
pilot, in what appears to be 
the cockpit of a Gulfstream 
G-II (YouTube) 
Michael and Janet Reiter at the Palm 
Beach Police Foundation Policemen's 
Ball at Mar-a-Lago, January 
2012 (Debbie Schatz / Palm Beach 
Daily News / ZUMAPRESS.com) 
Retired Palm Beach police 
detective Joe Recarey, 
November 2013 (Meghan 
McCarthy / Palm Beach Daily 
News / ZUMAPRESS.com) 
guests a: 
ture of a 
The j 
Mort Zu 
Microso: 
among I 
several c 
scientist 
She'd ha 
with Var 
informal 
to form 
In th 
Wha 
artist, hi 
swipe hi 
ter saw a 
The I 
It wa 
his offic( 
Epstein 
nal char 
include 
when he 
She'd 
one of hc 
On docu 
nerly Kellen/ 
:1) and husband, 
[river Brian Vickers, 
he red carpet at the 141st 
the Kentucky Derby 
11 Downs in Louisville, 
(Jeff Moreland / Icon 
via AP Images) 
Michael and Janet Reiter at the Palm 
Beach Police Foundation Policemen's 
Ball at Mar-a-Lago, January 
2012 (Debbie Schatz / Palm Beach 
Daily News / ZUMAPRESS.com) 
lice 
rey, 
,han 
laity 
om) 
FILTHY RICH 
guests are like pygmies next to the nearby twice-life-size sculp-
ture of a naked African warrior."" 
The journalist had confirmed that several prominent names—
Mort Zuckerman, the famous real estate mogul and publisher; 
Microsoft executive Nathan Myhrvold; and Donald Trump 
among them—had dined at the residence. She'd interviewed 
several of Epstein's friends and ex-friends: Nobel Prize—winning 
scientists, financiers who worked with Epstein at Bear Stearns. 
She'd handled Steven Hoffenberg with aplomb. And, working 
with Vanity Fair's editors, she'd figured out ways to slip even more 
information between the lines, in ways that would allow readers 
to form their own questions about Epstein's finances. 
In that respect, she'd fulfilled her original assignment perfectly. 
What Carter needed to figure out was what to do with the 
artist, her sister, and their mother's story. But before he could 
swipe his key card to let himself into the magazine's offices, Car-
ter saw a man standing in the reception area. 
The man was motionless. He'd been waiting for Carter. 
It was Jeffrey Epstein. Nonplussed, Carter invited him into 
his office. 
Epstein denied the claims involving underage women. No crimi-
nal charges had been filed. And so Vanity Fair decided not to 
include the claims in Ward's article. But, according to Ward, 
when her editor Doug Stumpf called her, she cried. 
She'd worked so hard on the piece, gotten so stressed out that 
one of her twins had begun to grow more slowly than the other. 
On doctor's orders; she'd been put on bed rest. 
151 
JAMES PATTERSON 
""Why?"" she asked when she got to speak to Carter directly. 
""He's sensitive about the young women. And we still get to 
run most of the piece."" 
In her notebook, Ward wrote down the rest of what Carter 
had said: ""I believe him,"" he told her. ""I'm Canadian."" 
But the piece that came out, in the March issue, still created a 
sensation. It was called ""The Talented Mr. Epstein"" in a sly refer-
ence to Patricia Highsmith's celebrated suspense novel The Tal-
ented Mr. Ripley. The film adaptation, by Anthony Minghella, was 
still fresh in the minds of Vanity Fair's readers. For Graydon 
Carter, just posing the question Is Epstein some sort of scam artist, 
like Ripley? had been question enough. And throughout the 
piece, there were ironies readers wouldn't miss as they drew 
their own conclusions about Epstein's life story. It came through 
clearly in the first line of the last paragraph of Ward's 7,500-word 
story: ""Many people comment there is something innocent, 
almost childlike about Jeffrey Epstein."" 
In context, the word innocent was rather ironic—so much so 
that it almost became its own opposite. 
752 
Todd Meister: June 20_ 
Harry Cipriani, on 
tion. The restaura 
post of Harry's Bar 
outpost in Venice. Locatei 
it's a theme restaurant— t 
hedge-fund manager name 
wealthy man—Jeffrey Ep 
father, Epstein's sometime 
""I've known Jeffrey sir 
let me tell you what I kr 
everybody else says. First 
and here's why—he has ril 
that for him."" 
Meister knows how to ii 
the son of a superrich fathe 
TTERSON 
got to speak to Carter directly. 
mg women. And we still get to 
down the rest of what Carter 
her. ""I'm Canadian."" 
in the March issue, still created a 
lented Mr. Epstein"" in a sly refer-
lebrated suspense novel The Tal-
lion, by Anthony Minghella, was 
lity Fair's readers. For Graydon 
Is Epstein some sort of scam artist, 
n enough. And throughout the 
ers wouldn't miss as they drew 
)stein's life story. It came through 
;t paragraph of Ward's 7,500-word 
It there is something innocent, 
Ei.pstein."" 
nt was rather ironic—so much so 
)pposite. 
152 
CHAPTER 39 
Todd Meister: June 2015 
Harry Cipriani, on Fifth Avenue, is a New York institu-
tion. The restaurant began its life as an American out-
post of Harry's Bar—which was itself a famous American 
outpost in Venice. Located inside the Sherry-Netherland hotel, 
it's a theme restaurant—the theme being money. And today, a 
hedge-fund manager named Todd Meister is talking about a very 
wealthy man—Jeffrey Epstein—whom he knows through his 
father, Epstein's sometime friend Bob Meister. 
""I've known Jeffrey since I was nineteen,"" Meister says. ""So 
let me tell you what I know—whatever everyone knows and 
everybody else says. First Off, he's no billionaire. Second off—
and here's why—he has no clue how to invest. He has people do 
that for him."" 
Meister knows how to invest. He does it for other people and, as 
the son of a superrich father, for himself. He also knows about the 
153 
71-
JAMES PATTERSON 
good life. Parties in Vegas; weekends in the Hamptons; affairs with 
beautiful women that end up getting splashed all over the tabloids. 
It makes sense that, once upon a time, he and Epstein would 
have gotten along. 
""As for the girls,"" Meister says, ""that was just business. He'd 
seat them strategically at client dinners. When he went to the 
movies, he'd take three or four girls with him. They'd take turns 
massaging his back, arms, and legs."" 
According to Meister, Epstein used to boast that he ""liked to 
go into insane asylums because he liked to fuck crazy women."" 
""Who knows if it's true?"" Meister adds. ""But I'm telling you, 
he used to say it."" 
From time to time, Epstein's friends and acquaintances would 
see sides of Epstein that he'd grown much less shy about sharing. 
Epstein encouraged Alan Dershowitz to invest with a prominent 
hedge-fund manager named Orin Kramer. Dershowitz did, and he 
made a lot of money at first. But in 2008, the fund Dershowitz had 
invested in lost a substantial amount. Afterward, according to a for-
mer associate of Epstein's, Epstein appeared in Kramer's midtown 
Manhattan office. There, sources say, he told Kramer: ""It's very much 
in your interest to make Alan Dershowitz whole."" 
Epstein's intervention worked, and Dershowitz recovered his 
money. 
To people who'd known Epstein back in the 1980s, this kind of 
behavior was out of character. But the thing about Epstein was 
that you never could figure him out. One minute he was charming. 
154 
FILT 
The most charming man you'd 
threat, and bluster. Somethini 
numbers: this many parties, t 
connection to Victoria's Secret, 
Throw in the modeling ag 
you plug in the parties. The SCE 
But the thing is, Eyes Wide Shi 
Epstein, getting on that plan 
moment in Caddyshach — the c 
out from his hole in the golf 
Epstein was like the mole in a 
a matter of time before he'd be 
to ask yourself was, are peopl 
als? Or are their morals like 
shed (along with all the othe) 
everyday working people have; 
Eyes Wide Shut world? 
Todd Meister, who was marri, 
heiress Samantha Boardman 
editorial director James Trurru 
loud: 
""How does a yutz like Epste 
At Harry Cipriani, the ques 
TERSON 
ds in the Hamptons; affairs with 
ig splashed all over the tabloids. 
In a time, he and Epstein would 
""that was just business. He'd 
dinners. When he went to the 
irls with him. They'd take turns 
n used to boast that he ""liked to 
he liked to fuck crazy women."" 
eister adds. ""But I'm telling you, 
7iends and acquaintances would 
)wn much less shy about sharing. 
showitz to invest with a prominent 
n Kramer. Dershowitz did, and he 
in 2008, the fund Dershowitz had 
punt. Afterward, according to a for-
An appeared in Kramer's midtown 
say, he told Kramer: ""It's very much 
:rshowitz whole."" 
ced, and Dershowitz recovered his 
:in back in the 1980s, this kind of. 
But the thing about Epstein was 
out. One minute he was charming. 
154 
FILTHY RICH 
The most charming man you'd ever meet. The next he was snarl, 
threat, and bluster. Something didn't add up. So you'd run the 
numbers: this many parties, that many women. Even with the 
connection to Victoria's Secret, the women didn't add up, either. 
Throw in the modeling agency, it makes more sense. Then 
you plug in the parties. The scene brings Eyes Wide Shut to mind. 
But the thing is, Eyes Wide Shut only works in the shadows. For 
Epstein, getting on that plane with Clinton was more like a 
moment in Caddyshack — the one in which the groundhog peeks 
out from his hole in the golf course. From there on in, Jeffrey 
Epstein was like the mole in a game of whack-a-mole. It was only 
a matter of time before he'd be caught. But the question you had 
to ask yourself was, are people like Epstein born without mor-
als? Or are their morals like snakeskin—just something they 
shed (along with all the other basic, day-to-day concerns that 
everyday working people have) as they make their way into that 
Eyes Wide Shut world? 
Todd Meister, who was married to Nicky Hilton and stole the 
heiress Samantha Boardman away from Conde Nast's former 
editorial director James Truman, should know. He wonders out 
loud: 
""How does a yutz like Epstein get beautiful women?"" 
At Harry Cipriani, the question lingers in the air. 
155 
PART IV 
The Investigation 
CHAPTER 40 
Michael Reiter: January 2006 
1 
As far as Michael Reiter's concerned, the case that his team 
has built against Epstein—slowly, meticulously, over the 
course of an entire year—is airtight. Even now, Detective 
Recarey's finding new pieces of evidence. And already Reiter's 
been laying the groundwork with prosecutors. State attorney 
Barry Krischer has a reputation for toughness. He's known, 
nationally, for his prosecution of juvenile offenders. And Reiter's 
been keeping him abreast of the investigation. With Jeffrey 
Epstein, it's not simply a matter of seeing him punished. It's a 
matter of getting a sexual predator off the streets of Palm Beach. 
Krischer assures the chief that he's taking this case very 
seriously. 
The state attorney's office will have Reiter's back at every 
turn. 
""I told him that we had an investigation that was very serious 
159 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Detective Recarey: Feb, 
IFor months, Joe Reca 
been brought to Epsi 
and car-rental records 
according to a source withi; 
would identify forty-seven 
on El Brillo Way. 
Recarey interviewed or 
David Rogers, as well as Ep5. 
He also spoke to a woman v 
It turned out that Epste 
actual Swedish deep-tissue] 
for him and his friends, ti 
them. 
Did anything untoward 
Epstein ever asked the worn; 
that involved a very noteworthy person and that involved a num-
ber of underage females,"" Reiter would say in his deposition for 
the suit that was later settled by Epstein. ""That it was of a sexual 
nature. I was concerned that we had not reached all of the vic-
tims, and we hadn't, I'm sure, at this point. I told him that I felt 
like the suspect would probably become aware of the investiga-
tion at some point and that we should probably expect some con-
tact from.. . Mr. Epstein's lawyers. And I told him that I wanted 
to keep him very well informed on this and that I hoped that he 
would do the same. And that we would have to have more con-
tact in making sure it was handled responsibly, intelligently, and 
appropriately as it moved forward."" 
Reiter would say that Epstein's name did not seem to ring a 
bell with the state attorney. But shortly afterward, the chief 
became aware that in certain powerful circles his investigation 
was being looked upon unfavorably. ""I had many people-related 
conversations ... on the cocktail-party circuit that suggested we 
approach this in a way that wasn't necessary,"" he would say. 
Michael Reiter was a good cop. A good man. But he was about 
to discover that when it came to men with the power and influ-
ence Epstein wielded, fairness under the law was a relative, mal-
leable concept. 
160 
A.TTERSON 
• person and that involved a num-
r would say in his deposition for 
p7 Epstein. ""That it was of a sexual 
ye had not reached all of the vic-
at this point. I told him that I felt 
ly become aware of the investiga-
should probably expect some con-
Ters. And I told him that I wanted 
:d on this and that I hoped that he 
we would have to have more con-
idled responsibly, intelligently, and 
yard."" 
teip's name did not seem to ring a 
. But shortly afterward, the chief 
powerful circles his investigation 
yorably. ""I had many people-related 
tail-party circuit that suggested we 
yasn't necessary,"" he would say. 
J. cop. A good man. But he was about 
le to men with the power and influ-
ss under the law was a relative, ma!-
160 
CHAPTER 41 
Detective Recarey: February 2006 
IFor months, Joe Recarey's been interviewing girls who'd 
been brought to Epstein's house, subpoenaing telephone 
and car-rental records, conducting surveillance. Ultimately, 
according to a source within the Palm Beach PD, the department 
would identify forty-seven underage girls who'd been molested 
on El Brillo Way. 
Recarey interviewed one of Epstein's pilots, a man named 
David Rogers, as well as Epstein's houseman, Alfredo Rodriguez. 
He also spoke to a woman who really was a massage therapist. 
It turned out that Epstein paid just one hundred dollars for 
actual Swedish deep-tissue massages that the therapist provided 
for him and his friends, the lawyer Alan Dershowitz among 
them. 
Did anything untoward ever happen? Recarey asked. Had 
pstein ever asked the woman to rub his chest? 
161 
JAMES PATTERSON 
No, she told him. She wasn't Epstein's type. The girls she'd 
seen at his house were very thin and beautiful and did not have 
tattoos. This massage therapist had several tattoos that were vis-
ible, and on quite a few occasions Epstein and Ghislaine Max-
well had made negative comments about them. 
According to a Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report 
filed by Recarey on July 25, 2006, the detective had also heard 
from Mary's father, who said that a private eye had been to his 
house, photographing his family and chasing visitors away. 
Mary's dad had gotten the license plate—Florida E79-4EG. 
Recarey traced it back to one Ivan Robles of West Palm Beach. 
Robles turned out to be a licensed private investigator. 
Recarey informed the state's attorney's office. 
Alison also contacted Recarey and told him that she'd been 
approached by someone who was in touch with Epstein. Alison 
had been told that she'd receive money if she would refuse to 
cooperate with the police. 
Those who help him will be compensated, she was told, 
according to Detective Recarey's incident report. ""And those who 
hurt him will be dealt with."" 
Recarey reassured the girl and told her that tampering with a 
witness in a case like this was a serious, arrestable offense. 
Then he told an assistant state attorney. 
The detective was leaving no i undotted and no t uncrossed. 
But he did wonder if the state attorney's office itself had 
become part of the problem. 
Barry Krischer: April 
State attorney Barry l 
before taking his post 
in and around Palm 
1992 and 1996, he had run 
and 2004. During the coil 
1970 with a three-year sti 
Brooklyn, he received a m 
from the Legal Aid Society 
with the juvenile justice s) 
protection team; the Peace 
nor Jeb Bush, for his work' 
time achievement award fi 
member of the National D: 
was not necessarily averse 
In 2003, he launched an in 
TERSON 
Epstein's type. The girls she'd 
and beautiful and did not have 
ad several tattoos that were vis-
-is Epstein and Ghislaine Max-
:s about them. 
rice Department Incident Report 
6, the detective had also heard 
a a private eye had been to his 
and chasing visitors away. 
ense plate —Florida E79-4EG. 
[van Robles of West Palm Beach. 
d private investigator. 
attorney's office. 
and told him that she'd been 
ts in touch with Epstein. Alison 
.-. money if she would refuse to 
be compensated, she was told, 
incident report. ""And those who 
id told her that tampering with a 
serious, arrestable offense. 
le attorney. 
)i undotted and no t uncrossed. 
state attorney's office itself had 
162 
CHAPTER 42 
Barry Krischer: April 2006 
State attorney Barry Krischer was an elected official, but 
before taking his post, he'd been a lawyer in private practice 
in and around Palm Beach. Elected twice to his office, in 
1992 and 1996, he had run unopposed for state attorney in 2000 
and 2004. During the course of his long career, which began in 
1970 with a three-year stint in the district attorney's office in 
Brooklyn, he received a number of awards: the pro bono award 
from the Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County for his service 
with the juvenile justice system and for his work with the child 
protection team; the Peace at Home award, presented by Gover-
nor jeb Bush, for his work with victims of family violence; a life-
time achievement award from the Florida Bar. He was a board 
member of the National District Attorneys Association. And he 
was not necessarily averse to going after the rich and powerful. 
In 2003, he launched an investigation into Rush Limbaugh's use 
163 
JAMES PATTERSON 
of, and means of obtaining, oxycodone and hydrocodone. (A few 
years after Limbaugh's arrest, which coincided with Chief Reit-
er's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the talk-show host settled 
with prosecutors, agreed to submit to random drug testing, and 
gave up his firearms permit.) 
Krischer himself, however, had been accused of sexual 
misconduct. 
In October of 1992, Jodi Bergeron, a legal secretary who'd worked 
for Krischer, filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against him in the 
Palm Beach County circuit court. That suit was dismissed, but a few 
months later, the woman took Krischer to federal court, accusing 
him of making unwanted advances and demanding recompense for 
battery, negligence, invasion of privacy, and emotional distress. 
Krischer had placed his hands, violently, inside her blouse, 
the woman said. He'd forcibly fondled her breasts, forcibly kissed 
her, and rubbed her shoulders while brushing her buttocks with 
his hands and knees, all while accompanying the gestures with 
verbal advances. 
When she declined those advances, the woman claimed, 
Krischer fired her. 
Krischer denied the allegations. At the time, he was making his 
first run for the state attorney's office. The charges were politically 
motivated, he said. Members of a local chapter of NOW—the 
National Organization for Women—had stood by the lawyer, cit-
ing his efforts to stop domestic violence, among his other virtues. 
""I am here to support Barry Krischer for the work his office 
did in my daughter's case,"" one woman said during a rally that 
took place in front of the courthouse. ""Her murderer received 
the maximum sentence, a life sentence."" 
The second lawsuit had also been dismissed— after Krischer's 
164 
former law firm agreed 
sand dollars in legal fees 
Now Chief Reiter and D( 
their own questions abc 
wanted to charge Epsteil 
behavior and four cour 
minor—felony charges 
behind bars in the case c 
Kellen would be charged 
This was not, the plai 
for Jeffrey Epstein. 
In cases involving tl. 
attorneys tend to have s 
But instead of granting I 
the police that he would 
asked to consider a broad 
In a case such as Epst€ 
ing in and of itself. But v 
only required in capital cas 
may also be called in ci 
involving crimes committ 
wasn't a public official, an 
cerned, the only controvet 
that Epstein was rich an 
B.B. vs. Epstein, Chief Reit( 
ecutor had to make sure t 
able doubt. And Krischer 
of the young women who'c 
1TERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
odone and hydrocodone. (A few 
hich coincided with Chief Reit-
3tein, the talk-show host settled 
nit to random drug testing, and 
had been accused of sexual 
:on, a legal secretary who'd worked 
sment lawsuit against him in the 
That suit was dismissed, but a few 
:rischer to federal court, accusing 
es and demanding recompense for 
ivacy, and emotional distress. 
nds, violently, inside her blouse, 
Indled her breasts, forcibly kissed 
mhile brushing her buttocks with 
accompanying the gestures with 
advances, the woman claimed, 
)fls. At the time, he was making his 
office. The charges were politically 
of a local chapter of NOW—the 
ten—had stood by the lawyer, cit-
Tiolence, among his other virtues. 
-y Krischer for the work his office 
ie woman said during a rally that 
irthouse. ""Her murderer received 
sentence."" 
o been dismissed—after Krischer's 
164 
former law firm agreed to pay Bergeron's attorney seven thou-
sand dollars in legal fees. 
Now Chief Reiter and Detective Recarey were beginning to have 
their own questions about Barry Krischer. The Palm Beach PD 
wanted to charge Epstein with one count of lewd and lascivious 
behavior and four counts of unlawful sexual activity with a 
minor—felony charges that would have amounted to years 
behind bars in the case of a conviction. Wendy Dobbs and Sarah 
Kellen would be charged as accomplices. 
This was not the plan that Krischer seemed to have in mind 
for Jeffrey Epstein. 
In cases involving the sexual abuse of minors, prosecuting 
attorneys tend to have suspects arrested, then push for a trial. 
But instead of granting his approval for an arrest, Krischer told 
the police that he would convene a grand jury, which would be 
asked to consider a broad range of charges. 
In a case such as Epstein's, this was highly unusual. Not damn-
ing in and of itself. But very strange. In Florida, grand juries are 
only required in capital cases. At the state attorney's discretion, they 
may also be called in controversial cases—for instance, cases 
involving crimes committed by public officials. But Jeffrey Epstein 
wasn't a public official, and as far as the Palm Beach PD was con-
cerned, the only controversial thing about the case they'd built was 
that Epstein was rich and well connected. In his deposition for 
B.B. vs. Epstein, Chief Reiter rel ayed Krischer's concerns: the pros-
ecutor had to make sure that his case was solid, beyond a reason-
able doubt. And Krischer did have his doubts about the credibility 
of the young women who'd be called to testify against Epstein. 
165 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Even so, Reiter was beginning to wonder if Krischer was 
stacking the deck in Epstein's favor—if, thanks to the sway 
prosecutors have over grand juries, assembling such a jury 
wasn't an excellent way to let Epstein off with the lightest pun-
ishment possible. 
Another unusual thing: the way Barry Krischer and the law-
yers working for him ignored Chief Reiter's multiple phone calls 
as well as Detective Recarey's— even though the police had been 
hearing from Epstein's own lawyers. 
""[Krischer] and I had an excellent relationship,"" Chief Reiter 
said in his deposition. ""I was the speaker at his swearing-in cere-
mony. And that he wouldn't return my phone calls—I mean, it 
was clear to me by his actions that he could not objectively look 
at this case."" 
In the incident report he ended up writing, Detective Recarey 
remembered a phone call that he received from Guy Fronstin, 
one of the lawyers representing Epstein. 
It was a message Epstein wanted to send, something central to 
the case that demanded explanation. The whole shit show swirling 
around him was just a misunderstanding—a misrepresentation—
of Epstein's actual interests and intentions. 
Fronstin says Mr. Epstein is very passionate about massages, 
Detective Recarey would write. 
And: Mr. Epstein had donated over $100,000 to the Ballet o 
Florida for massages. 
And: The massages are therapeutic and spiritually sound for 
him. That is why he has had so many massages. 
166 
Palm Beach Police Delia?. 
by Detective Joseph Reca 
On April 13 and April 14, ; 
eral occasions with ASA 
Weiss and ASA ILanna_I B 
victims needed to report for 
were left on their voicemai 
hours of 9:00 am and 11:30 
Weiss and ASA Belohlavek 
call as I had not heard from 
the time and date of the Gra 
At approximately 12:3( 
ney's Office and Located 
their offices. I entered ASA. 
me that she was going to rei 
an offer was made to the I 
CTERSON 
mg to wonder if Krischer was 
favor —if, thanks to the sway 
uries, assembling such a jury 
)stein off with the lightest pun-
vay Barry Krischer and the law-
lief Reiter's multiple phone calls 
even though the police had been 
mrs. 
ellent relationship,"" Chief Reiter 
: speaker at his swearing-in cere-
urn my phone calls—I mean, it 
hat he could not objectively look 
d up writing, Detective Recarey 
he received from Guy Fronstin, 
Epstein. 
n.ted to send, something central to 
Lion. The whole shit show swirling 
:standing—a misrepresentationitentions. 
; very passionate about massages, 
ted over $100,000 to the Ballet of 
rapeutic and spiritually sound for 
nany massages. 
166 
CHAPTER 43 
Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report Filed 
by Detective Joseph Recarey: July 25, 2006 
On April 13 and April 14, 2006, I attempted contact on sev-
eral occasions with ASA [assistant state attorney Daliah] 
Weiss and ASA [Latina] Belohlavek to ascertain when the 
victims needed to report for Grand Jury testimony. Messages 
were left on their voicemail. On April 17, 2006, during the 
hours of 9:00 am and 11:30 am I again left messages for ASA 
Weiss and ASA Belohlavek for either of them to return my 
call as I had not heard from the State Attorney's Office as to 
the time and date of the Grand Jury. 
At approximately 12:30 pm, I went to the State Attor-
ney's Office and Located ASA Weiss and ASA Belohlavek in 
their offices. I entered ASA Belohlavek's office who informed 
me that she was going to return my call. She explained that 
an offer was made to the Defense, Atty Guy Fronstin and 
167 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Atty Alan Dershowitz. The offer is 1 count of Agg Assault 
with intent to commit a felony, five years probation, with 
adjudication withheld. Epstein would have to submit to psy-
chiatric/sexual evaluation and no unsupervised visits with 
minors. When asked about all the other victims, ASA 
Belohlavek stated that was the only offer made as to one vic-
tim, [Mary]. ASA Belohlaveles] cell phone rang and went to 
voice mail. She checked her voice mail and played the mes-
sage on speaker. The caller identified himself as Atty Guy 
Fronstin and acknowledged the deal made between them. 
Fronstin stated in the message, he spoke with his client, Jef-
frey Epstein, and would agree to this deal. Fronstin asked to 
call off the grand jury as they would accept this deal. 
Belohlavek stated a probable cause would be needed to book 
Epstein in the county Jail and would let me know as to when 
it was needed. I explained my disapproval of the deal and not 
being consulted prior to the deal being offered. However I 
expressed that was only my opinion and the final approval 
would come from the Chief of Police. She explained to have 
Chief Reiter call Barry Krischer about the deal. I left the 
area and returned to the police station where I briefed the 
Chief about the deal offered. 
I checked my voice mail messages and discovered a mes-
sage from [the] stepmother for the victim [Mary]. She was 
calling because the State Attorney's Office still had not 
returned any of her calls as to when they are needed for this 
case. I then called ASA Belohlavek's office and left messages 
for her to call the victims on this case and explain to them 
what the State Attorney's Office had done. 
168 
Michael Reiter: May 2( 
A plea offer? 
Chief Reiter is o 
sands of hours of wc 
evidence. But instead of gob 
see Epstein get off with a a 
and a psych exam. 
Why? 
Alan Dershowitz has pre 
pieces of evidence — printot 
In her ""About Me"" colu 
Mary has written ""Ass and e 
Under ""Ever drank"" an 
""Yeah."" 
Under ""Ever shoplifted"": 
Under ""Ever skinny dipp, 
TERSON 
er is 1 count of Agg Assault 
v, five years probation, with 
would have to submit to psy-
no unsupervised visits with 
all the other victims, ASA 
only offer made as to one vic-
.1 cell phone rang and went to 
,ice mail and played the mes-
lentified himself as Atty Guy 
le deal made between them. 
, he spoke with his client, Jef-
to this deal. Fronstin asked to 
hey would accept this deal. 
ause would be needed to book 
would let me know as to when 
iisapproval of the deal and not 
deal being offered. However I 
!pinion and the final approval 
Police. She explained to have 
:her about the deal. I left the 
.ce station where I briefed the 
tessages and discovered a mes-
)r the victim [Mary]. She was 
ttorney's Office still had not 
) when they are needed for this 
lavek's office and left messages 
this case and explain to them 
ce had done. 
168 
CHAPTER 44 
Michael Reiter: May 2006 
A plea offer? 
Chief Reiter is outraged. His team has logged thou-
sands of hours of work. They've assembled mountains of 
evidence. But instead of going to trial, the state attorney wants to 
see Epstein get off with a misdemeanor, five years of probation, 
and a psych exam. 
Why? 
Alan Dershowitz has presented the prosecutors with his own 
pieces of evidence—printouts from the victims' Myspace pages. 
In her ""About Me"" column, under ""Best physical feature,"" 
Mary has written ""Ass and eyes."" 
Under ""Ever drank"" and ""Ever smoked pot,"" she's written 
""Yeah."" 
Under ""Ever shoplifted"": ""Lots."" 
Under ""Ever skinny dipped"": ""Yeah."" 
69 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Under ""[Do] you wanna lose your virginity"": ""I already lost it."" 
One of the victims has been caught with drugs and arrested. 
She's also been caught stealing from Victoria's Secret. From the 
state attorney's perspective, these girls look like compromised 
women. And if what they say about Epstein is true, wouldn't that 
make them prostitutes? 
As witnesses, they would be weak, while the lawyers on 
Epstein's side were exceptionally strong. 
Alan Dershowitz had represented Claus von Billow, the Brit-
ish socialite who was acquitted of the murder of his wife, Sunny. 
Dershowitz had been on 0. J. Simpson's team when the former 
football star was acquitted of the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole 
Brown Simpson and Nicole's friend Ronald Lyle Goldman. And 
rich as von Billow and Simpson had been, neither one had had 
the resources that Epstein was willing and able to deploy in his 
own defense. 
Neither of them had been intimate friends with his lawyer. 
As far as Reiter was concerned, none of that mattered. Even if 
Epstein thought that the girls he'd molested were eighteen years 
old—even if they had lied to him—it didn't matter under Flor-
ida law. The chief grew worried that in Epstein's case exceptions 
were being made, and he grew even more concerned with each 
unreturned call that he made to the state attorney's office. 
On May 1, the Palm Beach PD asked the state attorney's office 
to issue an arrest warrant for Jeffrey Epstein. 
That same day, Chief Reiter took the extraordinary step of 
writing Barry Krischer a letter all but demanding that he recuse 
himself from the case. 
170 
TOWN OF 
POLICE 13 
A NATiONAL STMT. ACC1 
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL 
10, Barry E Krischer, State Attorney 
Office of the State Attorney 
;itteentit Judicial Circuit 
401 North Dime Highway 
West Patrn Beach. FL 33401 
Dear Mr. Krischer. 
Please find enclosed the probable cause 
resulting from the Patm Beach PoLce Depa 
Kellen and Haley Robson The. submissio 
Assistam State Attoiney Latina ee!ohtdvef 
Beach Police Department's presentation fc 
I know That you agree that it •5 Our shared 
oJtlic interest ay clis,:harg,ng cur outies er 
odor observation to you that I coot:nue to he 
II,t-, regreltob!e the! fOrce0 
recent telephone calls to you and those of 
have Peen unanswered and messages red 
A'ter giv,ng th., much thought and consider 
course that your office's handling of thin 
sufhcient isason evistn tu rez,J.ro your Oa 
:ases 
Sir 
Mit 
Ch 
MSR•nt 
50,03.C.a.my RIO • Pas,•1 Reath. Fr.,* '00440 • t 
TERSON 
TOWN OF PALM BEACH 
POLICE DEPARTMENT 
A NATIONAL AM) STAT ACCREZrTE0 LAN,. ENFORaMENT ACZNCv 
MaN. 4, 2006 
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL 
Mr Barry E Krischer, State Attorney 
Office of the State Attorney 
Fifteenth Judicial Circu,t 
401 North Dixie 0-iighway 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Dear Mr Krischer, 
Prease find erclosed the probable cause attidavits and case filing packages thus far 
resulting f,orn !he Palm Beach PoPce Department's in. estigaton of Jeffrey Epstem, Sarah 
Kellen and Haley Robson The submission of these document:. are both in response to 
Ast,stam State Attorney Lwzna 6e.oh.dv,k's re;quest fur triem anti to serve as the Palm 
Beach Police Deoartrnent's presentation for prosecution 
I know that you agree that it is OW shared responsibility to seek justice and to serve the 
pittic trterest by dis,harging our outies r,th fairness ano accouritablity must rene,.... my 
prior Observation to you that I ontrnve to find your office's treatment of these cases highly 
urn.:-.uot 1 5 regrettable that! an forcao to communicate n this rranner tut my most 
recent telephone calls to you and those of the lead detective to your assigned attorneys 
have been uransi.vered and messages remain unreturned 
.Mier giv.ng this much treJght and consideration I rrJst urge you to examine the unusual 
course that your office's handling of this matter haS taken and consider 4 good and 
suffcient Teaser, er.!stt, to reciJ,re your air cwrificat'on fro"", tno prosecution of these 
:ases. 
Sincerely, 
',U(AtaS 2f1,,Ta 
Michel S. Reiter 
Chef of Police 
MSR-n: 
4SSevtloCoamyRtio4 • P1•nfie.0F. 334104443 • 051111184W • FsiuSit; $3.-g,t'O• 
Yur virginity"": ""I already lost it."" 
aught with drugs and arrested. 
.om Victoria's Secret. From the 
e girls look like compromised 
at Epstein is true, wouldn't that 
e weak, while the lawyers on 
strong. 
nted Claus von Billow, the Brit-
f the murder of his wife, Sunny. 
mpson's team when the former 
murders of his ex-wife, Nicole 
!.nd Ronald Lyle Goldman. And 
had been, neither one had had 
villing and able to deploy in his 
:imate friends with his lawyer. 
:d, none of that mattered. Even if 
molested were eighteen years 
m— it didn't matter under Flor-
that in Epstein's case exceptions 
even more concerned with each 
the state attorney's office. 
D asked the state attorney's office 
ffrey Epstein. 
/ took the extraordinary step of 
all but demanding that he recuse 
170 
F 1 L 
CHAPTER 45 
Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. vs. 
Epstein, a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein: 
November 23, 2009 
Q: At some point you sent a letter to state attorney Barry 
Krischer. Let me show you what we'll mark as exhibit 3. Let 
me give you a chance to read through this letter again to help 
refresh your recollection. 
A: I've read it. 
Q: At this point, in May of 2006, I'm assuming based on what 
you told us before that you had had some conversations with 
Barry Krischer directly. ...by phone—correct? —prior to this 
letter. 
A: I had conversations in person and by phone. 
Q: Okay. But nonetheless in May—May 1, 2006—you felt the 
need to write this letter; is that correct? 
A: Yes. 
172 
Q: Can you tell us why? 
A: Well, I felt the handling-.. 
way the state attorney's ofi 
unusual. I knew that M 
about this case. I felt tha 
felt that the appropriate 
governed the assignment 
that his action met the st 
from the statute in here. .A 
wouldn't return my phone 
The detective attempt 
state attorney's office, Lai 
nounce that ... and she \Ai( 
the letter in hope that he m 
realize that his objectivit) 
case and ask the governor 
like that was necessary fen 
had been submitted to hin 
Could you tell us, explain 
tivity may be lacking in r 
other words, what eviden( 
you felt made it potentially 
A: Well ... when I first told h 
that it was a serious case, I 
[and] that the suspect was 
it. And we were—it was i 
meeting that he and I w( 
known him to be a victim 
of children. Well, I know tl 
statute that addresses tho 
Q: 
FILTHY RICH 
Q: 
A: 
Q: 
Can you tell us why? 
Well, I felt the handling—and just continued to feel that the 
way the state attorney's office handled this case was extremely 
unusual. I knew that Mr. Krischer was making decisions 
about this case. I felt that his objectivity was lacking, and I 
felt that the appropriate way, after reading the statute that 
governed the assignment of cases to other circuits—I felt 
that his action met the standard. I used some of the words 
from the statute in here. And I attempted to call him, and he 
wouldn't return my phone calls. 
The detective attempted to contact—his contact in the 
state attorney's office, Lanna Belohlavek, however you pro-
nounce that ... and she wouldn't return his calls. So I wrote 
the letter in hope that he would think about his situation and 
realize that his objectivity was insufficient to prosecute the 
case and ask the governor to appoint someone else. And I felt 
like that was necessary for a fair prosecution of our case that 
had been submitted to him. 
Could you tell us, explain to us, why you felt that his objec-
tivity may be lacking in regards to this prosecution ... ? In 
other words, what evidence did you see here, uncover, that 
you felt made it potentially nonobjective? 
A: Well ... when I first told him about the case, and I realized 
that it was a serious case, [that] there were multiple victims, 
[and] that the suspect was very well known, I told him about 
it. And we were—it was in person. I talked to him after a 
meeting that he and I were both involved in. And I had 
known him to be a victim advocate and to protect the rights 
of children. Well, I know that he even wrote a portion of the 
statute that addresses those issues. And when I told him 
173 
CHAPTER 45 
Michael Reiter in B.B. vs. 
ainst Jeffrey Epstein: 
a letter to state attorney Barry 
a what we'll mark as exhibit 3. Let 
ad through this letter again to help 
1006, I'm assuming based on what 
u had had some conversations with 
by phone —correct? —prior to this 
rson and by phone. 
i May—May 1, 2006—y0u felt the 
is that correct? 
172 
JAMES PATTERSON 
originally, he said, ""Let's go for it; this is an adult male in his 
fifties who's had sexual contact with children of the ages of 
the victims."" He said this is somebody who we have to stop. 
And whatever we need, he said, in the state attorney's office, 
we have a unit that's equipped to investigate and prosecute 
these kinds of cases. And I didn't have too many facts early 
on when I talked with him, but I knew that there were multi-. 
pie victims and to our detectives they were believable. So 
when time went on and Mr. Epstein became aware of the 
investigation and his lawyers contacted the state attorney's 
office, they told me that. 
And from that point on, and I believe it was Mr. Dershow-
itz initially, the tone and tenor of the discussions of this case 
with Mr. Krischer changed completely. [At] one point he sug-
gested that we write [Epstein] a notice to appear, which 
would be for a misdemeanor. He just completely changed 
from not only our first conversation about this( —when] he 
didn't know the name Jeffrey Epstein— till when he had 
been informed on Mr. Epstein's reputation and his wealth, 
and I just thought that very unusual. 
I feel like I know him or knew him very well, the state 
attorney, and I just felt like he could not objectively make 
decisions about this case: that is why I wrote it. 
174 
Detective Recarey: May 
Chief Reiter's letter to ti 
effect. 
Krischer did not 
arrest warrant was issued. At 
tive Recarey received a telep 
ney Daliah Weiss, who advis 
the Epstein case. 
Weiss had been the perfe. 
member of the special victir 
and crimes against children, p 
ing rape, aggravated child al 
added another lawyer, a man 
Goldberger his attorney of rei 
. Goldberger was friendly A 
ciate of Goldberger's was mar 
TTERSON 
...or it; this is an adult male in his 
:act with children of the ages of 
somebody who we have to stop. 
aid, in the state attorney's office, 
)ed to investigate and prosecute 
didn't have too many facts early 
Nit I knew that there were multi-
..ctives they were believable. So 
r. Epstein became aware of the 
Ts contacted the state attorney's 
and I believe it was Mr. Dershow-
ior of the discussions of this case 
:ompletely. [At] one point he sug-
tein] a notice to appear, which 
ior. He just completely changed 
versation about this] —when] he 
Frey Epstein— till when he had 
tein's reputation and his wealth, 
• unusual. 
or knew him very well, the state 
:e he could not objectively make 
hat is why I wrote it. 
174 
CHAPTER 46 
Detective Recarey: May 2006 
Chief Reiter's letter to the state attorney had no perceptible 
effect. 
Krischer did not recuse himself from the case. No 
arrest warrant was issued. And on the afternoon of May 3, Detec-
tive Recarey received a telephone call from assistant state attor-
.ney Daliah Weiss, who advised him that she had been taken off 
the Epstein case. 
Weiss had been the perfect person to prosecute Epstein. As a 
member of the special victims unit, she focused on sex crimes 
and crimes against children, prosecuting high-profile cases involv-
ing rape, aggravated child abuse, and neglect. But Epstein had 
added another lawyer, a man named Jack Goldberger, and made 
Goldberger his attorney of record. 
Goldberger was friendly with Barry Krischer— and an asso-
ciate of Goldberger's was married to Daliah Weiss. 
175 
JAMES PATTERSON 
FILTI 
If Epstein's legal team had wanted to remove Weiss from the 
case, this would have been a good way to do it. 
Nine days later, Detective Recarey met with ASA Lanna 
Belohlavek, who told him that her boss, Barry Krischer, had asked 
her again to take the case to the grand jury. Recarey told Belohlavek 
that he had already requested arrest warrants for Epstein, Sarah Kel-
len, and Wendy Dobbs. The Palm Beach PD had finished its investi-
gation months earlier, he said, and had been waiting since then for 
the case to move forward. He asked her once more to issue the war-
rants. Once again Belohlavek declined, saying that the original offer 
her office had made to Epstein's old lawyer had been resubmitted to 
the new lawyer. When Epstein's reply came, she would call. 
While waiting for that call, Recarey received several calls 
from Mary's father, who told him that he was being followed by a 
green Chevrolet Monte Carlo— tailed so aggressively that other 
vehicles were being run off the road. Recarey ran the plates and 
found that the Chevy was registered to one Zachary Bechard of 
Jupiter, Florida. 
Bechard was a licensed private eye. 
""A funny thing happened in Palm Beach,"" says Tim Malloy, who 
was working as a TV newscaster in South Florida at the time. 
""This would have been right around the time that Michael 
Reiter sent his letter asking Barry Krischer to recuse himself 
from the case. I didn't even know what Epstein looked like, 
really, at the time. We had pictures taken by the British tabloids, 
where the link to Prince Andrew first broke. But we didn't have 
too many of them. What we did have was a contact in the hangar 
where Epstein kept his 727. 
176 
""I don't know how much y 
national Airport. It's the kind 
valet parking, and waiting loin 
you'll see in Manhattan. It's 
Saudi princes, heads of state. I' 
vacy. You can bring limousine: 
out Epstein was very secretive 
want anyone to know the tail n 
""But our contact didn't like 
how young the girls around EF 
had the 727's tail number, an 
someone I won't say too mucl 
flight plan for a certain trip hi 
going to land at the airport. A] 
the station's traffic helicopter a 
hundred feet a quarter mile sou 
""Our cameraman had a tele 
tight shot, on video, of Epstein 
did get the shot: Epstein, with 
flipped up over his neck, about 
that was waiting for him. 
""Then he saw our helicopter 
""I was doing a live voice-ov( 
first video anyone had on him I 
run back onto the plane. The: 
break, my producer told me 
Epstein wants us to stop taking 
talk to you.' 
""The cameraman kept rolli: 
out, got into a car with tinted w-
TTERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
inted to remove Weiss from the 
d way to do it. 
Recarey met with ASA Lanna 
r boss, Barry Krischer, had asked 
sand jury. Recarey told Belohlavek 
st warrants for Epstein, Sarah Kel-
Beach PD had finished its investi-
d had been waiting since then for 
td her once more to issue the war-
ined, saying that the original offer 
Id lawyer had been resubmitted to 
tply came, she would call. 
, Recarey received several calls 
n that he was being followed by a 
- tailed so aggressively that other 
road. Recarey ran the plates and 
tered to one Zachary Bechard of 
ate eye. 
lm Beach,"" says Tim Malloy, who 
:r in South Florida at the time. 
ht around the time that Michael 
;arry Krischer to recuse himself 
know what Epstein looked like, 
tires taken by the British tabloids, 
first broke. But we didn't have 
have was a contact in the hangar 
176 
""I don't know how much you know about Palm Beach Inter-
national Airport. It's the kind of place that has private hangars, 
valet parking, and waiting lounges that look as chic as anything 
you'll see in Manhattan. It's an airport for the rich, basically. 
Saudi princes, heads of state. Powerful men who value their pri-
vacy. You can bring limousines onto the tarmac. And we found 
out Epstein was very secretive about his dealings there. He didn't 
want anyone to know the tail numbers on his planes. 
""But our contact didn't like Epstein. And he was horrified by 
how young the girls around Epstein were. So thanks to him, we 
had the 727's tail number, and thanks to one other source—
someone I won't say too much about here—we had Epstein's 
flight plan for a certain trip he was making. We knew he was 
going to land at the airport. And so our producer climbed into 
the station's traffic helicopter and told the pilot to hover at five 
hundred feet a quarter mile south of the field. 
""Our cameraman had a telephoto lens. The idea was to get a 
tight shot, on video, of Epstein deplaning. And for a moment we 
did get the shot: Epstein, with the collar of his cashmere coat 
flipped up over his neck, about to run down the steps into a cart 
that was waiting for him. 
""Then he saw our helicopter, with the station's markings. 
""I was doing a live voice-over on Epstein's arrival. It was the 
first video anyone had on him up to that point. But Epstein had 
run back onto the plane. Then, during the next commercial 
break, my producer told me through my headpiece: 'Jeffrey 
Epstein wants us to stop taking his picture. In fact, he wants to 
talk to you.' 
""The cameraman kept rolling. And eventually Epstein got 
_out, got into a car with tinted windows, and was driven over the 
177 
JAMES PATTERSON 
bridge to his home in Palm Beach. So in a sense we failed to get 
the story. But the fact that Epstein would call a news program 
from his plane and command them to order the program's traffic 
helicopter away—that says something about the man's arro-
gance. And maybe his temper."" 
Mary: July 2006 
0 n June 29, assistant s 
Detective Recarey th; 
would be going to a 
convened for July 19. 
On July 12, Recarey spok 
that she still hadn't heard fr 
too, was odd, since Recarey 
upon to testify. 
She was back in Palm Be2 
out-of-state relatives. 
All in all, it had been a ve 
""What has happened to 
father would say. 
Mary had been sent to 
her it was the wrong place at 
.• 
178 
rTERSON 
h. So in a sense we failed to get 
em n would call a news program 
nn to order the program's traffic 
:nething about the man's arro-
CHAPTER 47 
Mary: July 2006 
0 n June 29, assistant state attorney Lanna Belohlavek told 
Detective Recarey that despite his protestations, the case 
would be going to a grand jury after all. One had been 
convened for July 19. 
On July 12, Recarey spoke with Mary's stepmother, who said 
that she still hadn't heard from the state attorney's office. This, 
too, was odd, since Recarey knew that Mary would be called 
upon to testify. 
She was back in Palm Beach now, after months of living with 
out-of-state relatives. 
All in all, it had been a very tough year for Mary. 
""What has happened to my daughter's life is criminal,"" her 
father would say. 
Mary had been sent to a school for troubled children. For 
her it was the wrong place at the worst time in her life. She had 
179 
178 
JAMES PATTERSON 
gotten into more fights there, growing depressed and withdrawn 
from her sister and parents. Helplessly, her parents watched her 
spiral out of control. As they neared the end of their rope, they 
sent her out of state. But after the move, Mary had fallen apart 
completely. She used drugs, fell in with a bad crowd, ran away 
from her relatives, and shacked up with a gang of drug dealers. 
When the gang was busted by local police, the dealers blamed 
Mary for snitching and put out the word that they wanted her 
dead. 
""We had to move her again,"" Mary's father explained. ""We 
finally got her into therapy—she's still seeing the therapist. And 
worst of all, she developed HPV. She's already had to have a seri-
ous operation."" 
Mary's troubles didn't end there. On June 28, she was brought 
in front of the grand jury. She hadn't been briefed by the state 
attorney—she hadn't even met the prosecutors—and she had 
no idea what she would be asked. 
Almost immediately, she found that she was being treated 
more like a criminal than like a witness or victim. 
""The prosecutor produced a printout of our daughter's 
Myspace page,"" Mary's father recalls. ""Mary was stunned. She 
began to cry. The prosecutor accused her of all sort of things; it 
was like she was working for Epstein. 
""All this time, we knew that we were being watched. Creepy 
guys. Private investigators from Miami. They would follow us, 
scaring the hell out of my wife and Mary's sister. My car was van-
dalized. It was like living in hell."" 
By this point, Epstein's defense dream team included Jack 
Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Gerald Lefcourt. All of them 
had excellent track records. Dershowitz and Lefcourt were two 
180 
of America's most famous 
celebrity lawyer—Ken Sta 
had had Bill Clinton impeac 
team. 
As far as Mary's parents 
walked into an ambush. EVE 
playing defense on the side 
ond girl—Alison, who cla: 
never testified in court at al 
TERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
wing depressed and withdrawn 
,lessly, her parents watched her 
tred the end of their rope, they 
le move, Mary had fallen apart 
in with a bad crowd, ran away 
ip with a gang of drug dealers. 
rlocal police, the dealers blamed 
the word that they wanted her 
,"" Mary's father explained. ""We 
e's still seeing the therapist. And 
She's already had to have a seri-
.ere. On June 28, she was brought 
hadn't been briefed by the state 
: the prosecutors—and she had 
d. 
mud that she was being treated 
t witness or victim. 
a printout of our daughter's 
recalls. ""Mary was stunned. She 
ccused her of all sort of things; it 
)stein. 
it we were being watched. Creepy 
m Miami. They would follow us, 
and Mary's sister. My car was van-
:11."" 
Jense dream team included Jack 
and Gerald Lefcourt. All of them 
)ershowitz and Lefcourt were tWO. 
180 
of America's most famous lawyers, and before long, another 
celebrity lawyer —Ken Starr, the former solicitor general who 
had had Bill Clinton impeached for perjury—would join Epstein's 
team. 
As far as Mary's parents were concerned, their daughter had 
walked into an ambush. Everyone in the courtroom seemed to be 
playing defense on the side of Jeffrey Epstein. And as for the sec-
ond girl—Alison, who claimed that she had been raped—she 
never testified in court at all. 
181 
CHAPTER 48 
Michael Reiter: July 2006 
0 n July 28, the grand jury reached a verdict that floored 
the Palm Beach PD. 
The original plea deal that Krischer had offered to 
Epstein had been bad enough. Now the grand jury was recom-
mending that Epstein be charged with just one felony count of 
solicitation of prostitution. 
There was no mention of underage girls. The original 
accusation— four felony counts of unlawful sex acts with minors 
and one felony count of lewd and lascivious molestation—had 
simply evaporated. 
It wasn't enough to send Epstein to prison. 
Epstein was allowed to surrender on a Sunday, when no one 
would know he'd been arraigned. A few hours later, he was 
released on three thousand dollars bail. 
The Palm Beach PD was not even notified. 
182 
Once again, Chief Reite 
took the extraordinary stej 
prosecutor's office. 
At the time, the federal 
Florida was a Republican 
Reiter recalls being presen 
and remembers Acosta's de( 
be the prosecution, to the 
who takes advantage of th 
sex crimes. Disgusted with 
recalls thinking he'd found 1 
In Acosta, the chief saw 
from confronting a man vc 
connections. 
But it turned out that Ac 
Starr's high-powered multir 
And while Acosta had a stei 
clerking for future Supreme 
only argued two cases befor( 
At the time, Reiter did not 
one had to look much more se 
Reiter's actions did not nece 
not in every corner of the coi 
""I had individuals sugge1 
the investigation and my ref 
was more horsepower than 
had other individuals suggc 
probably fits,"" Reiter said in 1 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 48 
ry reached a verdict that floored 
Leal that Krischer had offered to 
Now the grand jury was recom-
ged with just one felony count of 
pf underage girls. The original 
s of unlawful sex acts with minors 
and lascivious molestation—had 
)stein to prison. 
-render on a Sunday, when no one 
gned. A few hours later, he was 
llars bail. 
)t even notified. 
182 
Once again, Chief Reiter was outraged. So much so that he 
took the extraordinary step of calling the FBI and the federal 
prosecutor's office. 
At the time, the federal prosecutor of the Southern District of 
Florida was a Republican named R. Alexander Acosta. Chief 
Reiter recalls being present at Acosta's swearing-in ceremony 
and remembers Acosta's declaration that one of his goals would 
be the prosecution, to the fullest extent of the law, of anyone 
who takes advantage of the weak—especially perpetrators of 
sex crimes. Disgusted with Krischer's laissez-faire attitude, Reiter 
recalls thinking he'd found his man. 
In Acosta, the chief saw a prosecutor who wouldn't shy away 
from confronting a man with Jeffrey Epstein's resources and 
connections. 
But it turned out that Acosta had worked under Ken Starr at 
Starr's high-powered multinational law firm, Kirkland & Ellis. 
And while Acosta had a sterling resume, which included a stint 
clerking for future Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito, he had 
only argued two cases before a judge. 
At the time, Reiter did not know this. All he knew was that some-
one had to look much more seriously into Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. 
Reiter's actions did not necessarily make him a hero—at least, 
not in every corner of the community he served. 
""I had individuals suggest that the department's approach to 
the investigation and my referral of the investigation to the FBI 
was more horsepower than the investigation deserved. And I 
had other individuals suggest that—yeah, the term 'back off' 
Probably fits,"" Reiter said in his deposition for B.B. vs. Epstein. 
183 
JAMES PATTERSON 
""My responsibility was to 
Beach and preserve their con: 
department for all,"" Reiter sai 
particularly under the crimin 
the nature of our system, be ti 
But along with handing t 
attorney, Reiter took another 
letters—on Palm Beach PD I 
victims in the case. 
He delivered the letters by 
""I had people in the community in Palm Beach who either made 
comments directly to me or to others who relayed them to me that I 
didn't need to take the tack in the investigation that we did, which is 
[to] completely investigate it and then refer it to • the FBI after the 
state case was resolved,"" Reiter said in the deposition. ""I had one 
individual who came to see me a couple of times about this."" 
According to the chief, the individual in question was a 
prominent Palm Beach politician. 
""He said this wasn't necessary; this was a case that was really 
very minor,"" Reiter recalled. ""The victims had lifestyles that 
don't make them—shouldn't make them believable to the police 
department."" 
""I told him that those kinds of suggestions to me were 
improper and he should stop,"" said Reiter. ""That he had taken a 
couple of steps down the road toward something that could 
eventually constitute a crime. We talked several times. Early on 
it didn't end favorably. You know, this is an individual [whom] I 
had to interact with in my official capacity and in his official 
capacity as well."" 
The Palm Beach politician wasn't the only one to pressure 
the police chief. ""I received comments from a variety of different 
viewpoints ... in some cases I had people tell me, hey, he's a Palm 
Beacher, why are you investigating a Palm Beacher?"" Reiter 
would say when deposed. ""I had people that said it was an unfa-
vorable career move for me to ask the state attorney to remove 
himself from the case and to refer it to the FBI.... I had plenty of 
people that told me that that was a mistake."" 
Reiter didn't back off. To have done so would have been a 
betrayal—not only of the victims but also of his vocation and 
the community he had sworn he would serve. 
184 
TTERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
y in Palm Beach who either made 
ers who relayed them to me that I 
nvestigation that we did, which is 
then refer it to. the FBI after the 
aid in the deposition. ""I had one 
:ouple of times about this."" 
: individual in question was a 
1. 
y; this was a case that was really 
The victims had lifestyles that 
ike them believable to the police 
ids of suggestions to me were 
;aid Reiter. ""That he had taken a 
I toward something that could 
Ve talked several times. Early on 
Ar, this is an individual [whom] I 
icial capacity and in his official 
wasn't the only one to pressure 
iments from a variety of different 
id people tell me, hey, he's a Palm 
gating a Palm Beacher?"" Reiter 
d people that said it was an unfa-
ask the state attorney to remove 
fer it to the FBI.... I had plenty of 
is a mistake."" 
lave done so would have been a 
ims but also of his vocation and 
te would serve. 
184 
""My responsibility was to protect everyone that lives in Palm 
Beach and preserve their constitutional rights and be the police 
department for all,"" Reiter said. ""And I think that under the law, 
particularly under the criminal laws, that all people have to, by 
the nature of our system, be treated exactly alike."" 
But along with handing the case off to the FBI and the US 
attorney, Reiter took another unusual step. He wrote personal 
letters—on Palm Beach PD letterhead— to the parents of the 
victims in the case. 
He delivered the letters by hand. 
185 
TOWN OF PALM BEACH 
POLICE DEPARTMENT 
A NixitcNixt. AND STA1E ACCMITED LAW NPORCEMENT AC:ENCV kPOLICE.li 
July 24. 2006 
HAND DELIVERED 
BMA, 
Dear mripm 
Your claughterlanwas the victim of a crime which nas been investigated by the Palm 
Beach Police Department and subsequently referred for prosecution to the Pdtm Beach 
County State Attorneys Office. You may be aware that Jeffrey Epstein was indicted on 
charges of solicitation for orovitution by a Stele of Florida grand ply last week and turned 
himself in at the Palm Beach County jail on Ju!iy 23. 2006.. Wntle I do not speak for them, 
it is my understanding that is the full context in which the Palm Beach County State 
Attorney's Office intends to address the chrges that invowed tne crime in which your 
daughter was victim. 
Please know tnat it is the role and responsibility of law enforcement to investigate Crime 
and to refer ap3ropriate charges to the prosecutor for consideration. I believe that the 
Palm Beach Police Department has acted competently and responsibly in carrying out Ins 
:ole. Should you haverany questions concemlng the state prosecution of this matter, they 
are best addressed by the Palm Beach Count State Attorneys Office 
do not feel that Justice has been sufficiently served by the indictment that has been 
issued. Therefore, please Imo?. that his matter has been referreo to the Federal Bureau 
e Investigation to determine if violations of federal law have occurred. In the ehent that 
the FBI should choose to pursue this matter, tne Palm Beach Police Department will assist 
tnern in their investigation Of potential violations of federal law. 
Please feel free to contact rne at (561) 838-5460 should you have any questions 
Sincerely, 
1W40.J.0 as2,1t, 
r.richael S Reitr 
Chief of Police 
14SR.nt 
I4S S., Co.... PoE• • Poll, Reset Fen as 3'AP0-403 • r$ii) fta sit"": • F.:z 1,75..*: • • —• • ••••••,.. 
Jeffrey Epstein: Septemi 
In the winter of 2013, Scc 
die school principal from 
be sentenced to the m 
years in prison, with ten ye 
ing guilty to one charge of sc 
Blake's crime? He sent SE 
ton Beach police officer who N 
boy. But in a sense, Blake v 
tenced to life. The case was a 
treatment regular Florida fol.] 
with a minor. But nothing a 
and the plea deal he mana 
extraordinary. 
Epstein had bought himse 
assembled. His connections 
LM BEACH 
ARTMPNT 
LAW ENIFORCVENT ArZENCY 
4.2006 
which has been investigated by the Palm 
tarred for prosect:tion to the Palm Beach 
.vare that Jeffrey Epstein was indicted on 
of Florida grand jury last week and turned 
23. 2006. While I do not speak tor them, 
in which the Palm Beach County State 
es that invoNed tne crime in which your 
""Of law enforcement to investigate crime 
Jlor for consideration. I beleve that the 
etentiy and responsibly in carrying out this 
the state prosecution of this matter, they 
State Attame/5 Office 
served by the Indictment that has been 
has been referred to the Federal Bureau 
era i law have occurred. In the event that 
Palm Beach Police Deoartmeit will assist 
of federal law. 
0 should you have any questons 
sly, 
S Reiter 
4 Patice 
s3.5,g.• pa, !w;1;5.erre• 
CHAPTER 49 
Jeffrey Epstein: September 2007 
1 n the winter of 2013, Scott Blake, a forty-seven-year-old mid-
dle school principal from Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, would 
be sentenced to the minimum mandatory sentence— ten 
years in prison, with ten years of probation on top—for plead-
ing guilty to one charge of soliciting sex with a minor. 
Blake's crime? He sent sexually charged messages to a Boyn-
ton Beach police officer who was pretending to be a fifteen-year-old 
boy. But in a sense, Blake was lucky: he could have been sen-
tenced to life. The case was an interesting example of the kind of 
treatment regular Florida folks could expect just for soliciting sex 
with a minor. But nothing about Jeffrey Epstein was regular--
- 
and the plea deal he managed to strike in 2007 was simply 
extraordinary. 
Epstein had bought himself one of the best defense teams ever 
assembled. His connections and contributions to Democratic 
187 
JAMES PATTERSON 
FILT 
causes had made him a player on that side of the political aisle. He 
had a famous Republican, Bill Clinton's nemesis, Ken Starr, work-
ing the other side. And just to make sure they'd covered the bases, 
Epstein's team also recruited Roy Black— the lawyer who'd 
cleared William Kennedy Smith of rape and kept Rush Limbaugh 
out of prison for his alleged illegal drug use—and Jay Lefkowitz, 
a defense attorney who'd worked with US attorney R. Alexander 
Acosta at Ken Starr's law firm. 
And so in September, the US attorney's office reached a for-
mal agreement with Epstein's team: the United States would 
defer federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the state of 
Florida. 
A non-prosecution agreement (NPA) was drafted; among 
other things, it assured Epstein that he would not be prosecuted 
in the Southern District of Florida for felony offenses involving 
the sexual abuse of underage girls. (By that point, thirty known 
victims had been discovered.) Instead it allowed him to plead 
guilty to state felony offenses for solicitation of prostitution and 
the procurement of minors for prostitution. The NPA established 
a procedure that allowed Epstein's victims to sue him in civil 
court and took the extraordinary step of ensuring that ""any 
potential co-conspirators"" of Epstein's would be immune from 
prosecution. 
""In consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and 
to provide compensation in the manner described above, if 
Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of 
this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not 
institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspira-
tors of Epstein,"" the agreement stated, mentioning Sarah Kellen 
and Nadia Marcinkova by name. 
188 
""The parties anticipate tha 
part of any public record,"" I 
United States receives a Freed 
any compulsory process comm 
ment, it will provide notice 
disclosure."" 
Remarkably, despite assur 
feds, none of the victims was ( 
this NPA. 
If Epstein did not sign the 
count indictment and a decade 
team of lawyers had gotten him 
ted all the teeth in South Florid; 
For all his protestations of it 
in the world to agree to an NPA. 
On September 24, 2007, Eps. 
Once again, none of the I 
notified. 
189 
'TERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
that side of the political aisle. He 
nton's nemesis, Ken Starr, work-
ke sure they'd covered the bases, 
Zoy Black—the lawyer who'd 
)f rape and kept Rush Limbaugh 
LI drug use—and Jay Lefkowitz, 
. with US attorney R. Alexander 
3 attorney's office reached a for-
team: the United States would 
n. of prosecution by the state of 
nt (NPA) was drafted; among 
that he would not be prosecuted 
ida for felony offenses involving 
rls. (By that point, thirty known 
Instead it allowed him to plead 
)r solicitation of prostitution and 
)rostitution. The NPA established 
em's victims to sue him in civil 
lary step of ensuring that ""any 
pstein's would be immune from 
ri's agreement to plead guilty and 
the manner described above, if 
1 of the terms and conditions of 
lates also agrees that it will not 
against any potential co-conspira-
t stated, mentioning Sarah Kellen 
Le. 
188 
""The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made 
part of any public record,"" the document concludes. ""If the 
United States receives a Freedom of Information Act request or 
any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agree-
ment, it will provide notice to Epstein before making that 
disclosure."" 
Remarkably, despite assurances they'd received from the 
feds, none of the victims was consulted prior to the drafting of 
this NPA. 
If Epstein did not sign the agreement, he faced a fifty-seven-
count indictment and a decade or more in prison. But Epstein's 
team of lawyers had gotten him a deal so sweet it could have rot-
ted all the teeth in South Florida. 
For all his protestations of innocence, there was every reason 
in the world to agree to an NPA. 
On September 24, 2007, Epstein did sign it. 
Once again, none of the victims had been consulted or 
notified. 
189 
1 
CHAPTER SO 
Jane Doe: February 2008 
As a result of the non-prosecution agreement, a fifty-three-
count indictment that federal prosecutors had prepared 
against Jeffrey Epstein—one that claimed he'd abused 
dozens of underage women—never was filed. 
But as far as lawyers representing Epstein's victims were con-
cerned, the fact that those victims were not consulted about the 
non-prosecution agreement was inexcusable. The ""government 
deliberately kept crime victims 'in the dark' so that it could enter 
into a plea arrangement designed to prevent the victims from 
raising any objections,"" they would argue, in documents filed on 
February 10, 2016. For nine months, the lawyers claimed, from 
the time that the NPA was signed, on September 24, 2007, 
Krischer's office, ""doing Epstein's bidding, [had] concealed the 
NPA's existence from victim[s]"" and continued to do so until the 
190 
moment that Epstein had 
finally did June 30, 2008. 
In the interim, accordi 
were only told, ""This case i 
A lawsuit that Bradley I 
Fort Lauderdale, filed in ji 
Rights Act, or CVRA (tith 
which states that ""victims 
ing the right to be heard ii 
be precluded from court pr 
fairly."" 
According to him, pros( 
of the victims. Edwards, N 
knew that this suit against 
monetary recovery of any 
also knew that if the goveri 
entered into a contract thal 
rights of Epstein's victims, 
have been improper in an( 
remedy would have been tc 
while it is difficult to knoiA 
contract is overturned, on€ 
could prosecute Epstein fo 
statute of limitations on tho 
At the time of this wr: 
through the courts. It has 
Bleak House— the Charles 
is so massive and so compl€ 
everyone involved into the n 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 50 
;ecution agreement, a fifty-three-
N:leral prosecutors had prepared 
— one that claimed he'd abused 
Lever was filed. 
:nting Epstein's victims were con-
ims were not consulted about the 
Is inexcusable. The ""government 
'in the dark' so that it could enter 
ned to prevent the victims from 
ould argue, in documents filed on 
,onths, the lawyers claimed, from 
signed, on September 24, 2007, 
In's bidding, [had] concealed the 
""and continued to do so until the 
190 
moment that Epstein had to plead guilty in court, which he 
finally did June 30, 2008. 
In the interim, according to their lawyers, Epstein's victims 
were only told, ""This case is currently under investigation."" 
A lawsuit that Bradley Edwards, a victims' rights attorney in 
Fort Lauderdale, filed in July of 2008 cited the Crime Victims' 
Rights Act, or CVRA (title 18, section 3771, of the US Code), 
which states that ""victims of federal crimes have rights, includ-
ing the right to be heard in court, and most particularly, not to 
be precluded from court proceedings, and the right to be treated 
fairly."" 
According to him, prosecutors had violated the CVRA rights 
of the victims. Edwards, who said he was working pro bono, 
knew that this suit against the government would not allow for 
monetary recovery of any sort (including lawyers' fees). But he 
also knew that if the government, urged by Jeffrey Epstein, had 
entered into a contract that improperly or illegally violated the 
rights of Epstein's victims, then that contract, by nature, would 
have been improper in and of itself—in which case, the only 
remedy would have been to have the contract invalidated. And 
while it is difficult to know what, exactly, would happen if the 
contract is overturned, one possibility is that the government 
could prosecute Epstein for crimes against his victims, if the 
statute of limitations on those crimes has not expired. 
At the time of this writing, that case is winding its way 
through the courts. It has all the earmarks of a modern-day 
Bleak House........ the Charles Dickens novel about a legal case that 
is so massive and so complex that it drags on forever and drags 
everyone involved into the mire. 
191 
JAMES PATTERSON 
* * * 
In the meantime, Epstein began to settle out of court with his 
victims. 
In February of 2008, a Virginia woman who went by the alias 
Jane Doe #2 brought a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein. 
At the time of their meeting, she claimed, Epstein was fifty-two 
years old. She was a teenager, and her complaint, which was 
made public, gave the rest of the world an early glimpse of what 
Epstein, and the inner workings of his secret world, looked like 
from a victim's perspective. 
""Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret cli-
entele limited exclusively to billionaires,"" the lawsuit alleged. 
""He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influ-
ence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also 
owns residences in New Mexico, St. Thomas and Palm Beach, 
FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his 
lavish estate in Palm Beach."" The complaint continued: 
Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference 
and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan 
and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economi-
cally disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually 
assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 
2004-2005, Jane Doe, then approximately 16 years old, fell 
into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims. 
Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out 
his schemes and assaulted girls in Florida, New York, and on 
his private Island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas. 
Epstein's scheme involved the use of young girls to recruit 
192 
underage girls. (Upon inj 
who brought Jane Doe to 
of Epstein, and will ther 
plaint.) Under Epstein's r 
ostensibly to give a weal 
compensation in his Pal 
would be contacted when 
Palm Beach residence or 
Epstein or someone on hi. 
to bring one or more um 
recruiter, upon informatic 
economically disadvantag 
Palm Beach County who 
being offered— generally 
session—and who were p 
to authorities or have cre 
conduct were made. Thi 
Epstein's plan. 
Epstein's plan reflected 
Upon arrival at Epstein's 
would be introduced to Sar 
gathered the girl's persona 
and telephone number. Ms 
up a flight of stairs to a b( 
table in addition to other 
graphs of nude women lin 
bedroom. The girl would ti 
with Epstein, who would b, 
then remove his towel and 
and direct the girl to remol 
FILTHY RICH 
TER SON 
to settle out of court with his 
a woman who went by the alias 
1-dollar lawsuit against Epstein. 
Le claimed, Epstein was fifty-two 
ind her complaint, which was 
world an early glimpse of what 
of his secret world, looked like 
Loney manager with a secret cli-
llionaires,"" the lawsuit alleged. 
lclous wealth, power and influ-
al home in New York and also 
o, St. Thomas and Palm Beach, 
:rn Epstein's conduct while at his 
e complaint continued: 
Epstein has a sexual preference 
inor girls. He engaged in a plan 
:d access to primarily economi-
girls in his home, sexually 
gave them money. In or about 
tpproximately 16 years old, fell 
one of his victims. 
Jeffrey Epstein carried out 
rls in Florida, New York, and on 
Little St. James, in St. Thomas. 
the use of young girls to recruit 
192 
underage girls. (Upon information and belief, the young girl 
who brought Jane Doe to Epstein was herself a minor victim 
of Epstein, and will therefore not be named in this Com-
plaint.) Under Epstein's plan, underage girls were recruited 
ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary 
compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. The recruiter 
would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his 
Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. 
Epstein or someone on his behalf would direct the recruiter 
to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. The 
recruiter, upon information and belief, generally sought out 
economically disadvantaged underaged girls from western 
Palm Beach County who would be enticed by the money 
being offered—generally $200 to $300 per ""massage"" 
session—and who were perceived as less likely to complain 
to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper 
conduct were made. This was an important element of 
Epstein's plan. 
Epstein's plan reflected a particular pattern and method. 
Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the underaged victim 
would be introduced to Sarah Kellen, Epstein's assistant, who 
gathered the girl's personal information, including her name 
and telephone number. Ms. Kellen would then bring the girl 
up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage 
table in addition to other furnishings. There were photo-
graphs of nude women lining the stairway hall and in the 
bedroom. The girl would then find herself alone in the room 
with Epstein, who would be wearing only a towel. He would 
then remove his towel and lie naked on the massage table, 
and direct the girl to remove her clothes. Epstein would then 
193 
JAMES PATTERSON 
perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, 
including masturbation and touching the girl's vagina. 
Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Jane Doe 
was recruited to give Epstein a massage for monetary com-
pensation. Jane was brought to Epstein's mansion in Palm 
Beach. Once at the mansion, Jane was introduced to Sarah 
Kellen, who led her up the flight of stairs to the room with the 
massage table. In this room, Epstein told Jane to take off her 
clothes and give him a massage. Jane kept her panties and 
bra on and complied with Epstein's instructions. Epstein 
wore only a towel around his waste [sic]. After a short period 
of time, Epstein removed the towel and rolled over exposing 
his penis. Epstein began to masturbate and he sexually 
assaulted Jane. 
• After Epstein had completed the assault, Jane was then 
able to get dressed, leave the room and go back down the 
stairs. Jane was paid $200 by Epstein. The young girl who 
recruited Jane was paid $100 by Epstein for bringing Jane to 
him. 
As a result of this encounter with Epstein, Jane experi-
enced confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment, and 
has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries. 
194 
Jeffrey Epstein: June 30, 2 
n June 30, 2008, more 
Officer Pagan's investig; 
age girls, Jeffrey Epsti 
County jail. 
A few days earlier, Epstein 
New York Times. At the time, I. 
(the line having long since blu 
Saint Jeff's. 
""I respect the legal process 
by this."" 
He'd spent years fighting 
then the federal government, in 
would have seen him emerge 
battle had aged him. Mellowed 1-
all but boasted to a journalist fr 
1 
TERSON 
lascivious and sexual acts, 
aching the girl's vagina. 
rig plan and scheme, Jane Doe 
massage for monetary com-
!o Epstein's mansion in Palm 
fane was introduced to Sarah 
t of stairs to the room with the 
ostein told Jane to take off her 
ge. Jane kept her panties and 
pstein's instructions. Epstein 
laste [sic]. After a short period 
owel and rolled over exposing 
masturbate and he sexually 
ted the assault, Jane was then 
room and go back down the 
Epstein. The young girl who 
by Epstein for bringing Jane to 
'ter with Epstein, Jane experi-
iation and embarrassment, and 
:al and emotional injuries. 
194 
CHAPTER SI 
Jeffrey Epstein: June 30, 2008 
0 n June 30, 2008, more than three years after the start of 
Officer Pagan's investigation into his dealings with under-
age girls, Jeffrey Epstein reported to the Palm Beach 
County jail. 
A few days earlier, Epstein had taken a phone call from the 
New York Times. At the time, he'd been working, or vacationing 
(the line having long since blurred), at his compound on Little 
Saint Jeff's. 
""I respect the legal process,"" Epstein had said. ""I will abide 
by this."" 
He'd spent years fighting the charges—fighting the state, 
then the federal government, in an effort to avoid a sentence that 
would have seen him emerge from prison an old man. But the 
battle had aged him. Mellowed him, even. Months earlier, he had 
all but boasted to a journalist from New York magazine. 
195 
JAMES PATTERSON 
""It's the Icarus story, someone who flies too close to the sun,"" 
that journalist said in reference to ""the agony"" of Epstein's legal 
""ordeal."" 
""Did Icarus like massages?"" Epstein responded. 
But after Epstein's indictment, there were no more boasts. 
For the most part, he kept silent in public and retreated into his 
Eyes Wide Shut world. And when the New York Times did manage 
to get him to speak on the record, he spoke like a chastened man. 
Sitting on his patio down on Little St. James, Epstein likened 
himself to the shipwrecked Gulliver after he washes ashore on 
Lilliput. 
""Gulliver's playfulness had unintended consequences,"" he said. 
On the eve of his departure, he had a few more things to say: 
""That is what happens with wealth. There are unexpected 
burdens as well as benefits...."" 
""Your body can be confined, but not your mind...."" 
""I am not blameless...."" 
Outside of the agreement he'd signed with the prosecutor's 
office, this was the closest Epstein had come to admitting his 
guilt. But strange details were sprinkled throughout the story. 
He had formed a ""board of directors of friends"" who would coun-
sel him on his behavior. And, seemingly for the first time, he'd 
hired a full-time masseur—a man. 
Readers of the New York Times might have wondered: Epstein 
was going to jail for eighteen months. What need would he have 
for a full-time masseur? 
The story's last line hinted at the answer: in preparation for 
incarceration, Epstein had set up an e-mail alert. 
From then on, his automatic reply would read ""On vacation."" 
196 
TERSON 
PART V 
Incarceration 
who flies too close to the sun,"" 
o ""the agony"" of Epstein's legal 
pstein responded. 
it, there were no more boasts. 
in public and retreated into his 
the New York Times did manage 
, he spoke like a chastened man. 
Little St. James, Epstein likened 
liver after he washes ashore on 
intended consequences,"" he said. 
le had a few more things to say: 
wealth. There are unexpected 
but not your mind...."" 
signed with the prosecutor's 
Lein had come to admitting his 
sprinkled throughout the story. 
:ors of friends"" who would coun-
eemingly for the first time, he'd 
an. 
es might have wondered: Epstein 
mths. What need would he have 
at the answer: in preparation for 
p an e-mail alert. 
reply would read ""On vacation."" 
96 
CHAPTER 52 
Jeffrey Epstein: June 30, 2008 
The Palm Beach County Main Detention Center is on the 
west side of Lake Worth Lagoon, which separates West 
Palm Beach from the island of Palm Beach. Epstein's 
home on El Brillo Way is five miles to the east. Mary's high 
school is several miles to the west. 
It's fitting, somehow, that this jail—which is the jail Epstein 
ends up in, after turning himself in to the local sheriff—lies in 
between the two points. 
The detention center's inmates, their families, and their law-
yers call it the Gun Club, a reference not only to the jail's address, 
on Gun Club Road, but also to its population of hustlers, bur-
glars, drug dealers, rapists, and murderers. There's the occa-
sional hooker as well. And, from time to time, Haitian refugees 
are lodged there. 
There are three thousand inmates in all. 
199 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Some wait a year before making their way to the courthouse, 
their date with the public defender, and an appearance before 
the judge. Some get out much sooner, if only they can make bail. 
But there's no bail without money—or at least collateral—and, 
of course, being without money is often what lands people in jail 
in the first place. 
Jeffrey Epstein could have posted bail for every single inmate 
in the Gun Club. 
But that's just one of the ways in which Epstein is unlike his 
fellow inmates. He's an admitted pedophile now. Even a famous one. 
And, famously, pedophiles tend to fare poorly in jail. 
Luckily for Epstein, Ric Bradshaw, the sheriff in charge of 
local jails, transfers Epstein to the infirmary, where he spends 
exactly one night before being transferred seven miles up the 
road to a much smaller, safer location: the Palm Beach County 
Central Detention Center—or, as it's known, the Stockade. 
""It's not somewhere we'd put a serial killer,"" Ric Bradshaw says. 
Most of the residents here are addicts who take part in drug 
education programs, prostitutes, petty criminals, and drunks. 
It's a far safer place for Epstein to be, and, unlike other inmates 
(except, of course, those being held in solitary), he'll end up with 
his own cell, even his own wing, which he has to himself. 
Epstein's allowed to pay for a security guard, who sits outside the 
cell and keeps watch. And he's allowed any number of visitors. 
For a convicted felon, it's an extraordinary benefits package. 
But according to Sheriff Bradshaw, who also oversees the Stock-
ade, Epstein is incredulous over the treatment he is receiving. 
""He was astonished that he had to go to prison at all,"" Brad-
shaw remembers. 
""Let's just say he didn't think he belonged there."" 
200 
*et 
Sheriff Ric Bradshaw: June 
0 ur job,"" says Ric Bradsl 
killed him."" 
Sheriff Bradshaw co 
Western. Imposingly tall, witt 
mustache, and slow, southern 
old-school law officer— the ki] 
patrolling the streets of Tombst 
He's been a lawman for forty-fi 
been spent as the head of the co 
talk to the media, and today, as 
he's clearly uncomfortable, fidget 
But here in his wood-panele 
Gun Club, Bradshaw remembers 
,' ""We have a thousand sexua 
says. When he arrived here, he 
i 
20 
LTTERSON 
:ing their way to the courthouse, 
.nder, and an appearance before 
)oner, if only they can make bail. 
fey—or at least collateral—and, 
is often what lands people in jail 
)osted bail for every single inmate 
ays in which Epstein is unlike his 
pedophile now. Even a famous one. 
tend to fare poorly in jail. 
;radshaw, the sheriff in charge of 
o the infirmary, where he spends 
ig transferred seven miles up the 
location: the Palm Beach County 
r, as it's known, the Stockade. 
a a serial killer,"" Ric Bradshaw says. 
are addicts who take part in drug 
ltes, petty criminals, and drunks. 
in to be, and, unlike other inmates 
g held in solitary), he'll end up with 
1 wing, which he has to himself. 
security guard, who sits outside the 
allowed any number of visitors. 
an extraordinary benefits package. 
radshaw, who also oversees the Stock-
rer the treatment he is receiving. 
he had to go to prison at all,"" Brad-
hink he belonged there."" 
200 
CHAPTER 53 
Sheriff Ric Bradshaw: June 2015 
ur job,"" says Ric Bradshaw, ""was to make sure nobody 
killed him."" 
Sheriff Bradshaw could have stepped off the set of a 
Western. Imposingly tall, with his cowboy hat, Kurt Russell 
mustache, and slow, southern drawl, he looks exactly like an 
old-school law officer—the kind you once would have found 
patrolling the streets of Tombstone, Deadwood, or Dodge City. 
He's been a lawman for forty-four years, eleven of which have 
been spent as the head of the county's jails. As a rule, he doesn't 
talk to the media, and today, as he talks about Jeffrey Epstein, 
he's clearly uncomfortable, fidgety, and ill disposed. 
But here in his wood-paneled office on the first floor of the 
Gun Club, Bradshaw remembers Epstein quite well. 
""We have a thousand sexual predators in the county,"" he 
says. ""When he arrived here, he was one of them. He definitely 
201 
JAMES PATTERSON 
FIJ 
fit the category we have to ensure the general population is not 
going to take their anger out on."" 
Although he understands that Epstein is a sex offender 
and has a sense of the scope of his alleged crimes, Bradshaw's 
also aware that the actual conviction was for a ""low-level felony."" 
At the request of Epstein's attorneys—a request that is con-
firmed by a court order—Epstein is quickly granted ""work 
release."" 
What it means in practice is that six days a week, for up to 
sixteen—sixteen! —hours each day, Epstein is allowed to leave 
the Stockade to be driven by a designated driver in a car ear-
marked especially for him to any one of three places: his lawyer 
Jack Goldberger's office in downtown West Palm Beach, the 
Palm Beach office of a science foundation that he's established, 
and his house on El Brillo Way. 
Despite the ankle bracelet he wears, it could be argued that 
as a fabulously rich prisoner with two of his own jets parked 
nearby, at the Palm Beach International Airport, Epstein might 
have posed a flight risk. 
Instead, every day of the week save one, he's allowed to go to 
his lawyer's, to go to his office, or simply to go home. 
Did the deputy in charge of Epstein go to the house on El 
Brillo Way? 
Ric Bradshaw considers the question. 
""Yes,"" he says, ""he did."" 
Did the deputy go inside the house? 
""Yes, he did."" 
If so, the deputy might have encountered Nadia Marcinkova, 
who was staying on El Brillo Way at the time. He may also have 
202 
met a suave short-haired ge) 
French accent. 
That would be Jean-Luc 
For the duration of Jeffre 
the Stockade, Brunel's taken 
Brillo Way. 
2( 
'ATTERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
Jure the general population is not 
1. 
that Epstein is a sex offender 
of his alleged crimes, Bradshaw's 
liction was for a ""low-level felony."" 
ttorneys— a request that is con-
pstein is quickly granted ""work 
is that six days a week, for up to 
ch day, Epstein is allowed to leave 
• a designated driver in a car ear-
any one of three places: his lawyer 
lowntown West Palm Beach, the 
e foundation that he's established, 
y. 
t he wears, it could be argued that 
with two of his own jets parked 
.ternational Airport, Epstein might 
week save one, he's allowed to go to 
e, or simply to go home. 
e of Epstein go to the house on El 
he question. 
the house? 
ave encountered Nadia Marcinkova, 
) Way at the time. He may also have 
202 
met a suave short-haired gentleman who spoke with a distinct 
French accent. 
That would be Jean-Luc Brunel. 
For the duration of Jeffrey Epstein's stay—or half stay—in 
the Stockade, Brunel's taken up residence in the house on El 
Brill° Way. 
203 
F1 
fraudster named Arnold Pr 
had been commuted by Bill 
left office. 
Sheriff Bradshaw wants 
conjugal. 
But even US attorney Aca 
agreement with the governm( 
ment was highly irregular. 
""Epstein appears to have 
while in jail,"" Acosta would 
eral public. ""Although the tei 
are a matter appropriately lei 
eral authorities, without doi 
while in state custody underrr 
And, of course, Epstein's: 
by taxpayers. 
CHAPTER 54 
Jeffrey Epstein: June 30, 2008—July 21, 2009 
ccording to Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, the treatment Jeffrey 
Epstein received in the Stockade was not preferential. By 
some measures, he isn't wrong. 
In 2010, millionaire polo mogul John Goodman killed a 
young man while driving drunk. He was convicted but was 
allowed to spend two years under house arrest while his appeal 
was being tried. 
Like Epstein, Goodman was allowed visitors. But Goodman's 
visitor list was nothing like Jeffrey Epstein's. 
Nadia Marcinkova is said to have visited Epstein in jail more 
than seventy times. 
Epstein's assistant Sarah Kellen also visited Epstein in the 
Stockade. 
A Russian mixed martial artist named Igor ""Houdini"" Zinoviev was another visitor, as was a disbarred lawyer and financial 
204 
FILTHY RICH 
CHAPTER 54 
!008-July 21, 2009 
c Bradshaw, the treatment Jeffrey 
Stockade was not preferential. By 
't wrong. 
o mogul John Goodman killed a 
Irunk. He was convicted but was 
inder house arrest while his appeal 
vas allowed visitors. But Goodman's 
effrey Epstein's. 
I to have visited Epstein in jail more 
Kellen also visited Epstein in the 
ii artist named Igor ""Houdini"" Zino 
-
was a disbarred lawyer and financial 
204 
fraudster named Arnold Prosperi, whose own prison sentence 
had been commuted by Bill Clinton on the day before Clinton 
left office. 
Sheriff Bradshaw wants to be clear: none of these visits was 
conjugal. 
But even US attorney Acosta, who negotiated Epstein's unusual 
agreement with the government, would say that Epstein's arrange-
ment was highly irregular. 
""Epstein appears to have received highly unusual treatment 
while in jail,"" Acosta would say in a letter addressed to the gen-
eral public. ""Although the terms of confinement in a state prison 
are a matter appropriately left to the state of Florida and not fed-
eral authorities, without doubt, the treatment that he received 
while in state custody undermined the purpose of a jail sentence."" 
And, of course, Epstein's stay at the Stockade was subsidized 
by taxpayers. 
205 
Fi 
CHAPTER 55 
R. Alexander Acosta's letter to the general public, 
March 20, 2011 
To whom it may concern: 
I served as U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida 
from 2005 through 2009. Over the past weeks, I have read 
much regarding Mr. Jeffrey Epstein. Some appears true, 
some appears distorted. I thought it appropriate to provide 
some background, with two caveats: (i) under Justice Depart-
ment guidelines, I cannot discuss privileged internal com-
munications among department attorneys and (ii) I no longer 
have access to the original documents, and as the matter is 
now nearly 4 years old, the precision of memory is reduced. 
The Epstein matter was originally presented to the 
Palm Beach County State Attorney. Palm Beach Police 
alleged that Epstein unlawfully hired underage high 
206 
school females to provic 
massages. Police sought 
resulted in a term of im 
reports, however, in 200( 
to concerns regarding th( 
to charge Epstein only 
assault with no intent tc 
would have resulted in 
register as a sexual offet 
underage victims. 
Local police were di! 
ney's conclusions, and res 
Federal authorities recei 
engaged in additional invt 
the quality of the evidenc( 
at trial. With a federal 
considerations. First, a 
requires that the crime be 
an interstate nexus. Seco] 
charged by the state, the fe 
extent, to back-stop state 
is no miscarriage of justice 
erally that which has alre 
level. 
After considering the q 
additional considerations, 
the state charge was insufi 
the prosecutors and age 
Mr. Epstein's attorney, Rc:, 
best known for his suc 
CHAPTER 55 
er to the general public, 
T the Southern District of Florida 
Dver the past weeks, I have read 
ey Epstein. Some appears true, 
thought it appropriate to provide 
D caveats: (i) under Justice Depart-
discuss privileged internal com-
ment attorneys and (ii) I no longer 
I. documents, and as the matter is 
precision of memory is reduced. 
was originally presented to the 
te Attorney. Palm Beach Police 
Ilawfully hired underage high 
206 
FILTHY RICH 
school females to provide him sexually lewd and erotic 
massages. Police sought felony charges that would have 
resulted in a term of imprisonment. According to press 
reports, however, in 2006 the State Attorney, in part due 
to concerns regarding the quality of the evidence, agreed 
to charge Epstein only with one count of aggravated 
assault with no intent to commit a felony. That charge 
would have resulted in no jail time, no requirement to 
register as a sexual offender and no restitution for the 
underage victims. 
Local police were dissatisfied with the State Attor-
ney's conclusions, and requested a federal investigation. 
Federal authorities received the State's evidence and 
engaged in additional investigation. Prosecutors weighed 
the quality of the evidence and the likelihood for success 
at trial. With a federal case, there were two additional 
considerations. First, a federal criminal prosecution 
requires that the crime be more than local; it must have 
an interstate nexus. Second, as the matter was initially 
charged by the state, the federal responsibility is, to some 
extent, to back-stop state authorities to ensure that there 
is no miscarriage of justice, and not to also prosecute fed-
erally that which has already been charged at the state 
level. 
After considering the quality of the evidence and the 
additional considerations, prosecutors concluded that 
the state charge was insufficient. In early summer 2007, 
the prosecutors and agents in this case met with 
Mr. Epstein's attorney, Roy Black. Mr. Black is perhaps 
best known for his successful defense of William 
207 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Fij 
Kennedy Smith. The prosecutors presented Epstein a 
choice: plead to more serious state felony charges (that 
would result in 2 years' imprisonment, registration as a 
sexual offender, and restitution for the victims) or else 
prepare for a federal felony trial. 
What followed was a year-long assault on the prose-
cution and the prosecutors. I use the word assault inten-
tionally, as the defense in this case was more aggressive 
than any which I, or the prosecutors in my office, had 
previously encountered. Mr. Epstein hired an army of 
legal superstars: Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, for-
mer Judge and then Pepperdine Law Dean Kenneth Starr, 
former Deputy Assistant to the President and then Kirk-
land & Ellis Partner Jay Lefkowitz, and several others, 
including prosecutors who had formerly worked in the 
U.S. Attorney's Office and in the Child Exploitation and 
Obscenity Section of the Justice Department. Defense 
attorneys next requested a meeting with me to challenge 
the prosecution and the terms previously presented by 
the prosecutors in their meeting with Mr. Black. The 
prosecution team and I met with defense counsel in Fall 
2007, and I reaffirmed the office's position: two years, 
registration and restitution, or trial. 
Over the next several months, the defense team pre-
sented argument after argument claiming that felony 
criminal proceedings against Epstein were unsupported 
by the evidence and lacked a basis in law, and that the 
office's insistence on jail-time was motivated by a zeal to 
overcharge a man merely because he is wealthy. They 
bolstered their arguments with legal opinions from 
208 
well-known legal expert 
team warned me that th€ 
good man to serve time • 
book if we continued tc 
office systematically con! 
ment, and when we di 
appealed to Washington. 
The defense strategy 
Defense counsel investiga 
their families, looking for 
provide a basis for disqual 
ecutor is an effective (thi 
eliminating the individua 
and thus most qualified to 
lihood for success. Defensi 
least two prosecutors. I 
rejected, these arguments. 
Despite the army of au 
the terms first presented 
meeting. On June 30, 2008 
appeal to Washington D.( 
guilty in state court. He NiNq 
onment, register as a sexua 
restitution to the victims. 
Some may feel that the I 
tougher. Evidence that has 
encourage that view. Man; 
out, filing detailed statemen 
ages. Physical evidence has 
these additional statements 
2, 
ATTERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
ecutors presented Epstein a 
)us state felony charges (that 
prisonment, registration as a 
ation for the victims) or else 
trial. 
..ar-long assault on the prose-
. I use the word assault inten-
this case was more aggressive 
prosecutors in my office, had 
4r. Epstein hired an army of 
'rofessor Alan Dershowitz, for-
-dine Law Dean Kenneth Starr, 
3 the President and then Kirk-
_efkowitz, and several others, 
o had formerly worked in the 
in the Child Exploitation and 
Justice Department. Defense 
t meeting with me to challenge 
terms previously presented by 
meeting with Mr. Black. The 
let with defense counsel in Fall 
he office's position: two years, 
n, or trial. 
months, the defense team pre-
Lrgument claiming that felony 
tinst Epstein were unsupported 
ced a basis in law, and that the 
time was motivated by a zeal to 
ly because he is wealthy. They 
nts with legal opinions from 
208 
well-known legal experts. One member of the defense 
team warned me that the office's excess zeal in forcing a 
good man to serve time in jail might be the subject of a 
book if we continued to proceed with the matter. My 
office systematically considered and rejected each argu-
ment, and when we did, my office's decisions were 
appealed to Washington. As to the warning, I ignored it. 
The defense strategy was not limited to legal issues. 
Defense counsel investigated individual prosecutors and 
their families, looking for personal peccadilloes that may 
provide a basis for disqualification. Disqualifying a pros-
ecutor is an effective (though rarely used) strategy, as 
eliminating the individuals most familiar with the facts 
and thus most qualified to take a case to trial harms like-
lihood for success. Defense counsel tried to disqualify at 
least two prosecutors. I carefully reviewed, and then 
rejected, these arguments. 
Despite the army of attorneys, the office held firm to 
the terms first presented to Mr. Black in the original 
meeting. On June 30, 2008, after yet another last minute 
appeal to Washington D.C. was rejected, Epstein pled 
guilty in state court. He was to serve 18 months impris-
onment, register as a sexual offender for life, and provide 
restitution to the victims. 
Some may feel that the prosecution should have been 
tougher. Evidence that has come to light since 2007 may 
encourage that view. Many victims have since spoken 
out, filing detailed statements in civil cases seeking dam-
ages. Physical evidence has since been discovered. Had 
these additional statements and evidence been known, 
209 
JAMES PATTERSON 
the outcome may have been different. But they were not 
known to us at the time. 
A prosecution decision must be based on admissible 
facts known at the time. In cases of this type, those are 
unusually difficult because victims are frightened and 
often decline to testify or if they do speak, they give con-
tradictory statements. Our judgment in this case, based 
on the evidence known at the time, was that it was better 
to have a billionaire serve time in jail, register as a sex 
offender, and pay his victims restitution than risk a trial 
with a reduced likelihood of success. I supported that 
judgment then, and based on the state law as it then stood 
and the evidence known at the time, I would support that 
judgment again. 
Epstein's treatment, while in state custody, likewise 
may encourage the view that the office should have been 
tougher. Although the terms of confinement in a state 
prison are a matter appropriately left to the State of Flor-
ida, and not federal authorities, without doubt, the treat-
ment that he received while in state custody undermined 
the purpose of a jail sentence. 
Some may also believe that the prosecution should 
have been tougher in retaliation for the defense's tactics. 
The defense, arguably, often failed to negotiate in good 
faith. They would obtain concessions as part of a negotia-
tion and agree to proceed, only to change their minds, 
and appeal the office's position to Washington. The inves-
tigations into the family lives of individual prosecutors 
were, in my opinion, uncalled for, as were the accusations 
of bias and/or misconduct against individual prosecutors. 
210 
F: 
At times, some prosecut 
trial, and at times I felt t 
right in the first meetin 
spective of defense tacti 
tional right to a defense 
right should not be puni: 
sel's exercise of their ri 
Washington D.C. Proseci 
frustration and anger wi 
their judgment. 
After the plea, I reca 
One was from the FBI Sp( 
to offer congratulations. 
meetings regarding this c 
of the defense, and he cat 
holding firm against the 1 
itz, Lefkowitz and Starr. 
received calls or commun 
itz, Lefkowitz and Starr. I 
als previously, from my 
Kirkland & Ellis in the m 
peace. I agreed to talk an 
Epstein pled guilty, as I tt 
tors battle defense attorne 
have tried, yet I confess ti: 
fully in this case. 
The bottom line is this: 
served time in jail and is ni 
He has been required to pa) 
restitution clearly cannot c 
'ATTERSON 
n different. But they were not 
must be based on admissible 
1 cases of this type, those are 
e victims are frightened and 
they do speak, they give con-
• judgment in this case, based 
:he time, was that it was better 
time in jail, register as a sex 
ms restitution than risk a trial 
I of success. I supported that 
on the state law as it then stood 
: the time, I would support that 
Idle in state custody, likewise 
hat the office should have been 
rms of confinement in a state 
priately left to the State of Flor-
rities, without doubt, the treat-
le in state custody undermined 
nce. 
ve that the prosecution should 
Iliation for the defense's tactics. 
['ten failed to negotiate in good 
concessions as part of a negotia-
:d, only to change their minds, 
sition to Washington. The inves-
lives of individual prosecutors 
ailed for, as were the accusations 
:t against individual prosecutors. 
210 
FILTHY RICH 
At times, some prosecutors felt that we should just go to 
trial, and at times I felt that frustration myself. What was 
right in the first meeting, however, remained right irre-
spective of defense tactics. Individuals have a constitu-
tional right to a defense. The aggressive exercise of that 
right should not be punished, nor should a defense coun-
sel's exercise of their right to appeal a U.S Attorney to 
Washington D.C. Prosecutors must be careful not to allow 
frustration and anger with defense counsel to influence 
their judgment. 
After the plea, I recall receiving several phone calls. 
One was from the FBI Special Agent-In-Charge. He called 
to offer congratulations. He had been at many of the 
meetings regarding this case. He was aware of the tactics 
of the defense, and he called to praise our prosecutors for 
holding firm against the likes of Messrs. Black, Dershow-
itz, Lefkowitz and Starr. It was a proud moment. I also 
received calls or communications from Messrs. Dershow-
itz, Lefkowitz and Starr. I had known all three individu-
als previously, from my time in law school and at 
Kirkland & Ellis in the mid 90s. They all sought to make 
peace. I agreed to talk and meet with each of them after 
Epstein pled guilty, as I think it important that prosecu-
tors battle defense attorneys in a case and then move on. I 
have tried, yet I confess that this has been difficult to do 
fully in this case. 
The bottom line is this: Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire, 
served time in jail and is now a registered sexual offender. 
He has been required to pay his victims restitution, though 
restitution clearly cannot compensate for the crime. And 
2/1 
JAMES PATTERSON 
we know much more today about his crimes because vic-
tims have come forward to speak out. Some may disagree 
with prosecutorial judgments made in this case, but 
those individuals are not the ones who at the time 
reviewed the evidence available for trial and assessed the 
likelihood of success. 
• Respectfully, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
Former U.S. Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
PATTERSON 
7 about his crimes because vic-
speak out. Some may disagree 
lents made in this case, but 
,t the ones who at the time 
ilable for trial and assessed the 
PA i T 
• Respectfully, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
Former U.S. Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
212 
ftermath 
CHAPTER 56 
Jeffrey Epstein: July 2009 
Jeffrey Epstein walks out of the Stockade on July 21, 2009, 
having served less than thirteen months of his eighteen-month 
sentence. One of the concessions his lawyers have gotten 
while working out his plea-deal guarantees is that the media not 
be alerted to the time and day of his departure. 
But from now on, Epstein, who is fifty-six, will carry the 
mark of a level 3 sex offender—level 1 being the lowest, and 
level 3 indicating the highest possible risk of a future criminal 
act of a sexual nature. Wherever he goes, he will be forced to reg-
ister as such. 
Every ninety days, Epstein will have to check in with the 
authorities. Every year, the New York City Police Department 
will take his mug shot. And for a full year, Epstein will be under 
house arrest in Palm Beach. 
This last prohibition doesn't stop him from flying, with court 
215 
JAMES PATTERSON 
approval, on his own planes to New York and to Little Saint Jeff's, 
where the locals have taken to referring to Epstein's 727 as the 
Lolita Express. 
There are other restrictions, of course, that Epstein is sup-
posed to abide by. He has to provide the state of Florida with a 
list of all the motor vehicles, boats, and airplanes he owns. The 
full list includes two Escalades, six Suburbans, two Ford F-150s, 
two Harley-Davidsons, a Land Rover, a Hummer H2, a thirty-
four-foot JVC boat, and a thirty-five-foot Donzi powerboat. 
Three of his five planes turn out to be registered to a com-
pany called Air Ghislaine, Inc. 
As a registered sex offender, Epstein is legally obliged to 
undergo psychiatric treatment. This is a restriction he'll get 
around by having his own psychologist submit a report to law 
enforcement officers. 
Epstein is also prohibited from accessing pornography on 
the Internet and using social networking for sexual purposes. 
For Jeffrey Epstein, there will be no Bangbros, Tinder, or 
Swingles. com. 
There will be lawsuits. 
Six weeks before probation ends, he settles with seven women 
who sue him in civil court. But Epstein can easily afford the set-
tlement payments. He won't be going back to jail, and in regard 
to further prosecution for any criminal actions, his troubles are 
behind him. 
Not everyone who's spent time in his company will be so 
lucky. 
216 
Alfredo Rodriguez: Aug 
E pstein's houseman, Al 
prison sentence. 
In a sworn statem 
maid, Lupita, who had comi 
up after Epstein's ""massage5 
lic, had cried as she describe 
Rodriguez was fired by I 
after seeing a strange car— g 
As it turned out, the ca 
masseuses. 
On his way out of the hc 
of Epstein's papers, which he 
by Chief Reiter's investigator. 
For years, Rodriguez tries 
manager. No one wanted tc 
IATTERSON 
New York and to Little Saint Jeff's, 
referring to Epstein's 727 as the 
s, of course, that Epstein is sup-
rovide the state of Florida with a 
oats, and airplanes he owns. The 
, six Suburbans, two Ford F-150s, 
1 Rover, a Hummer H2, a thirty-
-five-foot Donzi powerboat. 
rn out to be registered to a corn-
ler, Epstein is legally obliged to 
it. This is a restriction he'll get 
ychologist submit a report to law 
from accessing pornography on 
.etworking for sexual purposes. 
will be no Bangbros, Tinder, or 
ends, he settles with seven women 
it Epstein can easily afford the set-
e going back to jail, and in regard 
• criminal actions, his troubles are 
time in his company will be 
216 
CHAPTER 57 
Alfredo Rodriguez: August 2009 
Epstein's houseman, Alfredo Rodriguez, also ends up with a 
prison sentence. 
In a sworn statement, Rodriguez talks about Epstein's 
maid, Lupita, who had complained to him about having to clean 
up after Epstein's ""massages."" Lupita, who was a devout Catho-
lic, had cried as she described the stained towel and sex toys. 
Rodriguez was fired by Epstein, he says, when he called 911 
after seeing a strange car—a ""beater"" —in Epstein's driveway. 
As it turned out, the car had belonged to one of Epstein's 
masseuses. 
On his way out of the house on El Brillo Way, he took some 
of Epstein's papers, which he failed to produce when questioned 
by Chief Reiter's investigators. 
For years, Rodriguez tried and failed to find work as a house 
nager. No one wanted to hire someone who'd worked for 
217 
JAMES PATTERSON 
Jeffrey Epstein. Finally, desperately, he tried to sell the informa-
tion he'd stolen. 
The papers named underage girls and the places where 
Epstein had taken them. The list included locations in Califor-
nia, Paris, New Mexico, New York, and Michigan. The papers 
also included the names, addresses, and phone numbers of 
famous individuals—Henry Kissinger, Mick Jagger, Dustin Hoff-
man, Ralph Fiennes, David Koch, Ted Kennedy, Donald Trump, 
Bill Richardson, Bill Clinton, and former Israeli prime minister 
Ehud Barak among them. 
This was intriguing, if not at all damning. Epstein made a 
habit of collecting such information for future use. But informa-
tion pertaining to the girls would have bolstered the state's case 
against Jeffrey Epstein, and by withholding it from the Palm 
Beach PD and the FBI, Rodriguez had committed a crime. 
In his defense, Rodriguez would say that the papers were an 
""insurance policy."" Without them, he believed, Epstein would 
have made him ""disappear."" 
But now Rodriguez needed the money. And so a few weeks 
after Epstein's release from the Stockade, he approached a lawyer 
who was representing some of Epstein's masseuses. He had the 
""holy grail,"" he insisted. A• golden nugget."" The names of hun-
dreds of girls, he said, who had been abused by Epstein. 
The lawyer told Rodriguez in no uncertain terms that he was 
obliged to turn whatever he had over to the authorities. By 
demanding money for the information, Rodriguez was commit-
ting another crime. 
According to a sworn statement by Christina Pryor, a special. 
agent with the FBI, Rodriguez ""persisted that he would only turn 
over the information in his possession in exchange for $50,000."" 
218 
Fr u. 
Two months later, on Octobe. 
who insisted once more on bi 
lawyer told him that an associ 
What the lawyer knew one 
the associate in question was. 
the FBI. A few days later, on I' 
guez and sets up a meeting, wl 
""During the meeting, Roc 
book and several sheets of lega 
ten notes,"" Special Agent Pryo 
continues: 
Rodriguez explained that he 
his former employer's resid 
2004 to 2005 and that the ho 
working for his former emp 
detail the information within 
ant information to the UCE. I; 
he had previously lied to the. 
about the $50,000, took posse 
counting it. 
Rodriguez was then detai. 
Proceedings, Title 18, U.S. Co 
tioned. After Miranda warning 
Rodriguez waived his rights a 
those rights. Rodriguez admiti 
and book in his possession an 
to local law enforcement or th 
21 
?ATTERSON 
FILTHY RICH 
.ately, he tried to sell the informa-
rage girls and the places where 
list included locations in Califor-
York, and Michigan. The papers 
'dresses, and phone numbers of 
:issinger, Mick Jagger, Dustin Hoff-
Dch, Ted Kennedy, Donald Trump, 
and former Israeli prime minister 
)t at all damning. Epstein made a 
nation for future use. But informa-
Duld have bolstered the state's case 
by withholding it from the Palm 
;uez had committed a crime. 
would say that the papers were an 
them, he believed, Epstein would 
ed the money. And so a few weeks 
i.e Stockade, he approached a lawyer 
of Epstein's masseuses. He had the 
golden nugget."" The names of hun-
ad been abused by Epstein. 
!z in no uncertain terms that he was 
le had over to the authorities. By 
iformation, Rodriguez was commit 
itement by Christina Pryor, a special 
tz ""persisted that he would only air, . .; 
0 
.ossession in exchange for $50,000."" ...,. .) 
218 
* * * 
Two months later, on October 28, the lawyer called Rodriguez, 
who insisted once more on being paid for the information. The 
lawyer told him that an associate would be in touch. 
What the lawyer knew and Rodriguez did not know was that 
the associate in question was an undercover employee (UCE) of 
the FBI. A few days later, on November 2, the UCE calls Rodri-
guez and sets up a meeting, which takes place the following day. 
""During the meeting, Rodriguez produced a small bound 
book and several sheets of legal pad paper containing handwrit-
ten notes,"" Special Agent Pryor would say in her statement. She 
continues: 
Rodriguez explained that he had taken the bound book from 
his former employer's residence while employed there in 
2004 to 2005 and that the book had been created by persons 
working for his former employer. Rodriguez discussed in 
detail the information within the book and identified import-
ant information to the UCE. In addition, Rodriguez admitted 
he had previously lied to the FBI. Rodriguez asked the UCE 
about the $50,000, took possession of the money, and began 
counting it. 
Rodriguez was then detained for Obstruction of Official 
Proceedings, Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 1512(c), and ques-
tioned. After Miranda warnings were administered by agents, 
Rodriguez waived his rights and signed a written waiver of 
those rights. Rodriguez admitted that he had the documents 
and book in his possession and had never turned them over 
to local law enforcement or the FBI. In addition, Rodriguez 
219 
JAMES PATTERSON 
advised he had witnessed nude girls whom he believed were 
underage at the pool area of his former employer's home, 
knew that his former employer was engaging in sexual con-
tact with underage girls, and had viewed pornographic 
images of underage girls on computers in his employer's 
home. Rodriguez was then released from custody for further 
investigation. 
The items that Rodriguez had attempted to sell to the 
UCE for $50,000.00 were reviewed by an agent familiar with 
the underlying criminal investigation. As Rodriguez had 
described, the items contained information material to the 
underlying investigation that would have been extremely use-
ful in investigatang] and prosecuting the case, including the 
names and contact information of material witnesses and 
additional victims. Had those items been produced in 
response to the inquiries of the state law enforcement officers 
or the FBI Special Agents, their contents would have been 
presented to the federal grand jury. 
Following his release, Alfredo Rodriguez was arrested again. 
He appeared in court on June 18, 2010, facing charges of cor-
ruptly concealing records and documents. Dressed in a blue 
jumpsuit and shackles, he apologized for his crimes and asked 
the court to be merciful. 
He received a sentence of eighteen months. 
It was the same punishment that Jeffrey Epstein had gotten 
for his crimes. But unlike Epstein, Alfredo Rodriguez served his 
time in a federal prison and did not ask for, or receive, permis-
sion to go on work release. 
220 
Prince Andrew: 2011 
p rince Andrew also fares 
imprisonment. 
The two men are old I 
Ghislaine Maxwell introduced] 
time in the 1990s. In 2000, Eps 
Castle to celebrate the queen's E 
flew to Sandringham, the quee) 
a party Prince Andrew threw for 
The prince had also visited 
Palm Beach as well as in New 
Roberts made in her 2015 decla 
asked her to give the prince Iv; 
back with the details. 
According to the Guardian, 
tied together at Windsor Castle, 
2; 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016251.txt,"imperfectly specified objectives conflicting with our own—whose motivation to preserve
their existence in order to achieve those objectives may be insuperable.

1001 Reasons to Pay No Attention

Objections have been raised to these arguments, primarily by researchers within the AI
community. The objections reflect a natural defensive reaction, coupled perhaps with a
lack of imagination about what a superintelligent machine could do. None hold water on
closer examination. Here are some of the more common ones:

e Don’t worry, we can just switch it off? This is often the first thing that pops into a
layperson’s head when considering risks from superintelligent Al—as if a
superintelligent entity would never think of that. This is rather like saying that the
risk of losing to DeepBlue or AlphaGo is negligible—all one has to do is make
the right moves.

e Human-level or superhuman AI is impossible This is an unusual claim for AI
researchers to make, given that, from Turing onward, they have been fending off
such claims from philosophers and mathematicians. The claim, which is backed
by no evidence, appears to concede that if superintelligent AI were possible, it
would be a significant risk. It’s as if a bus driver, with all of humanity as
passengers, said, “Yes, I am driving toward a cliff—in fact, I’m pressing the pedal
to the metal! But trust me, we’ll run out of gas before we get there!” The claim
represents a foolhardy bet against human ingenuity. We have made such bets
before and lost. On September 11, 1933, renowned physicist Ernest Rutherford
stated, with utter confidence, “Anyone who expects a source of power from the
transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” On September 12, 1933,
Leo Szilard invented the neutron-induced nuclear chain reaction. A few years
later he demonstrated such a reaction in his laboratory at Columbia University.
As he recalled in a memoir: “We switched everything off and went home. That
night, there was very little doubt in my mind that the world was headed for grief.”

e It’s too soon to worry about it. The right time to worry about a potentially serious
problem for humanity depends not just on when the problem will occur but also
on how much time is needed to devise and implement a solution that avoids the
risk. For example, if we were to detect a large asteroid predicted to collide with
the Earth in 2067, would we say, “It’s too soon to worry”? And if we consider
the global catastrophic risks from climate change predicted to occur later in this
century, is it too soon to take action to prevent them? On the contrary, it may be
too late. The relevant timescale for human-level AI is less predictable, but, like
nuclear fission, it might arrive considerably sooner than expected. One variation
on this argument is Andrew Ng’s statement that it’s “like worrying about
overpopulation on Mars.” This appeals to a convenient analogy: Not only is the

* AI researcher Jeff Hawkins, for example, writes, “Some intelligent machines will be virtual, meaning they
will exist and act solely within computer networks. .. . It is always possible to turn off a computer network,
even if painful.” https:/Avww.1ecode.net/2015/3/2/11559576/.

3 The AI100 report (Peter Stone et al.), sponsored by Stanford University, includes the following: “Unlike
in the movies, there is no race of superhuman robots on the horizon or probably even possible.”
https://ail00.stanford.edu/20 16-report.

31

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016251
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013760.txt,"Ehlers, C.L., Havstad, J., Prichard, D., Theiler, J. (1998) Low doses of ethanol

reduce evidence for nonlinear structure in brain activity. J Neurosci 18:7474-86

Ehlers, C., Havstad, J.W., Schuckit, M.A. (1995) EEG dimension in sons of
alcoholics. Alcohol Clin. Exp Res 19:992-998

Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., Rockstroh, B., Berg, P., Cohen, R.(1992) Physical
aspects of the EEG in schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatry 32:595-606

Erdos, P., Renyi, A. (1970). On a new law of large numbers. J. Anal. Math. 22:103-
111

Farmer, D., Crutchfield, J., Froehling, H., Packard, N., Shaw, R. (1980) Power
spectra and mixing properties of strange attractors. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 357:453-

472

Farmer, J.D., Ott, E., Yorke, J.A. (1983) The dimension of chaotic attractors.
Physica D7: 153-180

Feder, J. (1988) Fractals. Plenum. N.Y.

Feigenbaum, M.J. (1979) The universal metric properties of nonlinear
transformations, J. Stat. Phys. 21:669-702

Fell, J.,Roschke, J., Beckmann, P. (1993) Deterministic chaos and the first positive
Lyapunov exponent: a nonlinear analysis of the human electroencephalogram

during sleep. Biol Cybern 69:139-46

Fell, J., Roschke, J., Schaffner, C. (1996) Surrogate data analysis of sleep

electroencephalograms reveals evidence for nonlinearity. Biol Cybern 75:85-92

260

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013760
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029207.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 7/14/2014 9:45:41 AM 
To: Ed Boyden 
Subject: Re: deception 
definitely 
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Ed Boyden <M11=IMMI> wrote: 
Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas, 
the perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my 
schedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is 
running strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so 
that is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now 
much more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities 
launching... 
Best, 
Ed 
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Lesley Groff < > wrote: 
> Good morning Neil...I am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. I am 
so very sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon. 
> Thank you, 
> Lesley 
> Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein 
> On Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Neil Gershenfeld < 
>> Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses 
will be a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues. 
>> Neil 
> wrote: 
and beach balls optional, hopefully this 
Ed Boyden, Ph. D. 
Leader, Synthetic Neurobiology Group 
Associate Professor, MIT Media Lab and McGovern Institute, 
Departments of Biological Engineering and Brain and Cognitive Sciences 
Co-Director, MIT Center for Neurobiological Engineering 
New York Stem Cell Foundation-Robertson Investigator 
MIT, Room E15-421, 20 Ames St., Cambridge, MA 02139 
email - 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029207 
office - 
cell - 
fax - 
skype - 
web - http://syntheticneurobiology.org 
twitter - http://twitter.com/eboyden3  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029208 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029286.txt,"Trump’s relationship with Barrack is one of the most important, if little understood, of
the president’s life, offering a case study of what it takes to remain close to him in a
time of such turmoil.

Read more »

Ee os
=e

You are signed up for the following breaking news alerts: Politics.

You received this email because you signed up for breaking news alerts. Don't want to receive
Trending Now alerts? Click here. For additional free email alerts and newsletters, or to
unsubscribe, click here.

We respect your privacy. If you believe that this email has been sent to you in error, or you no
longer wish to receive email from The Washington Post, click here. Contact us for help.

©2017 The Washington Post, 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029286
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026134.txt,"﻿Kiev, 12 June 2017
Dear George,
Re: Ukrainian Banking Opportunity
Further to our discussion, I am sending a brief presentation on the prospect of
establishing a banking footprint in Ukraine through the acquisition of a bank.
Currently the central bank in Ukraine, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) is not
keen to issue new banking licenses but urge prospective investors to acquire an
existing license.
The main drivers for my positive stance on investing in the banking sector in
Ukraine are:
▪ the improving economy following the IMF program with demanding but
required structural reforms, with real GDP growth expected to reach 4% in
2020;
▪ the improving political conditions in terms of the conflict with Russia with
the support of NATO;
▪ the recent developments in the EU-Ukraine relationship with the abolition of
visa and the prospect of concluding the Association Agreement in July;
▪ the investment and commitments from supranational institutions so far
(EBRD: c. US$6 billion being the third largest exposure of the bank after
Turkey and Russia, World Bank: c. US$5 billion);
▪ the significant restructuring efforts in ensuring a healthier banking sector
following AQR that resulted to the nationalization of the biggest bank
Privatbank and the closing of half of the banks (over 90 banks), and the
preparation of the state sector banks (52% share of assets) for privatization
in the next 2 to 3 years; and
▪ the current landscape of the banking sector that allows organic expansion
because of very few notable foreign banks that have the ability to develop
business or, even more, to exploit the potential for consolidating the banking
sector where government owns 52% in a market with increasing trend in
loans and deposits and high commission income.
1
!
Economy
Following a severe crisis in 2014-15, the economy is growing again-by 2.3 percent
in 2016-and the flexible exchange rate and tight fiscal and monetary policies have
greatly reduced internal and external imbalances. GDP, which declined from its
peak of US$183 billion in 2013 to US$90 billion in 2015, is now recovering at a
growth above 2% and is expected to grow at 3.2% in 2018. Growth is projected at
3.5%-4% in the medium term (IMF).
The current account deficit fell sharply, from over 9% of GDP in 2013 to 3.6% of
GDP in 2016 and reserves-while still low-have more than doubled to US$17.6
billion (end of 2017 target at US$21.3 billion). The overall fiscal deficit-including
the energy sector’s quasi-fiscal losses, which had increased to 10 percent of GDP
in 2014, declined to 2.3% of GDP in 2016, supported by strong spending control
and the decision to raise energy tariffs to market levels.
Inflation has fallen steadily from its peak of 61% in April 2015 to 12.4% by end-
2016, well within the target range of the NBU. It is projected to reach 9% in 2017
and 5% in the medium term.
Ukraine has entered into a 4-year Extended Fund Facility (EFF) with IMF in
March 2015 for US$17.5 billion. Following the third review by IMF the fourth
tranche of US$1 billion was approved which would bring total disbursements
under the arrangement to about US$8.38 billion. The EFF aims to put the economy
on the path to recovery, restore external sustainability, strengthen public finances,
maintain financial stability, and support economic growth by advancing structural
and governance reforms, while protecting the most vulnerable.
The Ukrainian administration showed commitment to reforms by nationalising the
largest private bank, Privatbank, and liquidating over 100 banks within 3 years.
2
Also, collection of taxes has increased significantly (34% increase in 2 years) and
spending has been contained while at the same time energy/utility tariffs have
increased dramatically at full cost recovery basis.
The main reforms agreed with the IMF include the privatisation of large state
enterprises such as the Odessa Portside Plant and Centrenergo, the lifting of the
embargo on the sale of agricultural land to foreigners, the raising of the pension
age, the restructuring of the health system and the increase in efforts combating
corruption.
Most of these reforms, although not expected to be completed in the immediate
term, they are expected to be implemented in a gradual process.
For example, land reform may be initiated partially by privatising state agricultural
land (1 billion hectares). 25% of world’s black-earth soil is in Ukraine, considered
the most fertile and productive agricultural land. Over 70% of Ukraine is
agricultural land valued at US$100 billion. Ukraine is the biggest exporter in
sunflower oil globally, 2 nd in world grain exporter after the US and 3 rd in corn
exports globally. The land reform is expected to elevate the country’s performance
with significant FDIs from international investors.
On the pension front, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the draft of the pension
reform-IMF and World Bank already supported the draft- and will discuss it at the
National Reform Council, to be then submitted to the Rada (parliament). The
pension reform was long overdue, given that the Pension Fund deficit reached
UAH 140 billion or 6.3% of GDP in 2016. Pension reform is considered to be one
of the most socially sensitive reforms the government is planning to implement
under the current IMF Extended Arrangement. However, it seems that the
government has managed to avoid the most unpopular measure of increasing the
statutory pension age while increasing the effective pension age. The proposed
reform will assist in reducing the deficit starting from mid-2018.
The implementation of the reforms should assist the government in managing the
debt profile of the country presented below. While there is no imminent need for
IMF disbursements, 2019 (presidential and parliamentary) elections coincide with
a US$7 billion peak of public sector FX needs, while US$12 billion is due in total
in 2017-19. The authorities need to secure sufficient FX funding in advance, while
the alternative funding sources are limited. The FX reserves increased to US$17
billion, but cover 3.8 months of imports only.
As already described in the recent IMF review, Ukraine is expected to re-access the
international capital market as early as the second part of 2017 supported by the
improved debt profile resulting from the recent debt operation (perimeter of the
debt operation included sovereign and sovereign guaranteed Eurobonds, City of
Kyiv Eurobonds, Guaranteed Commercial Loans and SOE debt) for a total nominal
3
!
value of USD 19.3 billion). The debt profile has become more favorable with the
increase of the share of official debt, a decline in the foreign currency debt share
and the very low share of short term debt. This should effectively make easier the
refinancing of the debt in 2019 and 2020.
The synthesis of the current parliament allows the government to push for reforms
in 2017 and early 2018 before they turn to populist measures just before elections.
Leading the country off-track with the IMF program will surely limit even further
the funding resources of the country.
Politics
EU has verified its support by (i) lifting its visa requirements to Ukrainian citizens
for traveling, a long awaited move that embeds symbolism of support and (ii)
following the vote by the Dutch parliament to support Ukraine’s Association
Agreement, it is expected that the ratification of the Association Agreement,
including the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area component will be ratified
in the Ukraine-EU Summit on July 13.
NATO has also shown strong support to Ukraine by providing various forms of
assistance through advice and training to strengthen its defence by building
stronger security structures. The Ukrainian defence industry may also get
permission to participate in tenders for the supply of goods and services for NATO.
4
Last week Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin stated that he expects an
expanded partnership between Ukraine and NATO will lead Ukraine to a
membership in the Alliance following a path similar to that of Montenegro.
With regard to the United States, for now President Trump’s ambiguous
positioning in Russian affairs seems to have little impact on the U.S.
Administration's Ukraine policy. The Administration is expected to continue its
support for the actions of NATO, the IMF and Secretary of State Tillerson has
reaffirmed in April 2017 that the U.S. will not lift sanctions against Russia as long
President Putin does not hand Crimea back to Kiev.
In internal politics, we would expect Mr Poroshenko, the President of Ukraine, to
sign the Association Agreement, thus improving his diminishing ratings and to
win the presidential elections in 2019. In my opinion, Mr Poroshenko is also
delaying the elections in the conflict zone of Donbass, a major requirement
featured in the Minsk Agreement, in order to avoid the negation of his good
performance on the European prospect, and then, assessing the Russian conflict
situation at that point in time, to progress with the Minsk Agreement and
effectively resolve a major part of the conflict. I do not think that Crimea will ever
find its way back to Ukraine but if all other matters are resolved, a financial
settlement would be considered.
Therefore the status of “frozen conflict” in the Donbass area would remain in the
short to medium term but the economy of Ukraine has been operating for a number
of years now without the Donbass and the annexed to Russia Crimea. All growth
estimates published by various international institutes incorporate similar
assumptions.
Banking Sector
In the past 3 years there has been a clean-up by the National bank of Ukraine
(NBU) with the support of IMF mainly as well as of EBRD and IFC. The number
of banks has been reduced from 192 to 92 and there are still banks that will be
liquidated. The most drastic action was the nationalisation of Privatbank, the
biggest bank in the country (market share 17.7% by assets, 36% of deposits of
physical persons), owned by an oligarch that was posing a systemic risk to the
country’s economy and which was found to be insolvent mainly because of bad
lending practices with loans extended to related parties. However, Privatbank is
servicing 20 million customers providing to them state-of-the-art digital banking
5
and other electronic services. IMF has demanded that the resolution of this issue as
well as the recapitalisation of other banks, as it resulted from the AQRs performed
by NBU, is a prerequisite for the disbursement of its 4th tranche which in fact was
executed successfully by the Ukrainian administration.
As a result the banking sector presented record losses in 2016 of US$6.2 billion
(Privatbank US$5.2 billion). 1Q17 is already in profit (US$220 million) and is
expected to continue increasing throughout the year.
The current landscape is that 40 banks make up the 98% of the assets, the top 20
the 90.2%, the top 10 the 74% and of which 10 the top 4 banks are state owned and
make up the 52% of the assets.
Top 20 banks in Ukraine
For the State Owned Banks, namely Privatbank, Oschadbank, Ukrexim and
Ukrgas, the plan is that they prepare them for sale in the medium term, in around
2-3 years. To this purpose EBRD mostly and IFC to a lesser extent has been
assisting the Government by placing directors in the Supervising Boards of these
banks, so that corporate governance is implemented.
6
The Russian government owned banks, making up the 8.4% of the banking assets,
are heavily undercapitalised being below the required norms because of
underprovided problematic loan portfolios with NBU imposing certain sanctions.
Moreover, there have been many aggressive actions from Ukrainian activists
because of the war conflict and all of them, namely Sberbank, VTB (controls two
banks in Ukraine, VTB and BM Bank) and Prominvestbank, have announced their
departure by selling the banks. So far the sale of Sberbank has been agreed to
Norvik bank of Latvia that belongs to individuals of Russian origin, pending the
approval from the NBU.
The banks with Ukrainian capital in the top 20 banks share 6% of assets with the
most notable being FUIB of Mr Akhmetov.
Proposal
I would propose the acquisition of a profitable bank with lower than the average
NPL portfolio, operated by a West European shareholder, with a reasonable market
share and of a digestible acquisition price in order to capture the projected 4-year
economic growth trend in Ukraine (base scenario by IMF and EBRD) in a market
with:
▪ Small competition
Analysing the current landscape of the top 20 banks that command around 90%
market share of assets, there are very few banks that would be competent to
pursue business development given their specific circumstances.
The state owned banks that command the 52% are obviously bothered with
trapped legacy and corporate governance issues. All four banks are also
preparing for their potential privatisation, however, the task of transforming the
mentality of the staff of these banks to that similar of a private one should be
close to impossible, at least for a period of 3 years. I would have thought that
their liquidity would be most probably invested in government titles rather than
pursuing loans aggressively by competing at low interest rates.
The Russian government owned banks that command 8.4% are already at the
“sales process” stage and I believe that there will be no European investors that
would invest in such banks that are undercapitalised as officially NBU has
confirmed, with most of their loans being NPEs.
7
!
!
!
Effectively the banks that could compete and have the size and access to
cheaper foreign exchange funding as well as trade finance capabilities are
Raiffeisen, Ukrsib, Credit Agricole and OTP accounting for 12.6% collectively.
Raiffeisen is engaged in dealing with the retail business and the work out of
their NPLs. However, its long-serving CEO Mr Lavrenchuk is rumoured to
become the Governor of NBU and the management team will be replaced with
expatriates from Raiffeisen’s head office. This move will create a major upset in
the bank’s structure and may result to a major change in strategy with a
considerable time to be needed for bringing the bank back to smooth operation.
Alfa who have bought over Unicredito’s Ukrsots bank (6.5% combined) and
who have historically being engaged in retail lending and large corporates
should continue to pursue this business and should devote resources to the
merger with Ukrsots and manage the business lending that should take some
time to grasp. Rumours say that they will initiate the merger process in not less
than a year and already they have discontinued new business lending servicing
existing customers only.
FUIB have been given a plan to recapitalise the bank or decrease their assets
and therefore they are out of the business for the time being.
ING and Citi are providing large corporate and investment banking services
only.
▪ Improving quality of borrowers
Following the improvement in collecting taxes and the enactment of new
legislation, and therefore decreasing the non-declared income, as well as the
significant increase in commodity prices and the increase in disposable income,
credit affordability has increased among business and individuals.
▪ Increasing loans and deposits that suffice for the credit growth
Evolution of loans and deposits 2015-2021
The European prospect of Ukraine that is supported not only politically but
also from the international financial institutions along with the effort of the
8
government to execute the structural reforms and hence achieve the economic
growth projected, should allow the access of the Ukrainian enterprises to the
European market and lead to further consolidation in the banking market.
In particular the loans market should increase and is projected by IMF at
US$17.5 billion in the period 2018-2021 (9.9% CAGR). It is anticipated that
there will be a significant demand for investment loans so that SMEs and large
corporates invest in infrastructure in order to produce products and services at
standards accepted in the EU countries.
Deposits are increasing (1Q17: 1.3% comprising increase in UAH deposits of
3.8% and decrease in FC of 1.9% mainly due to the repayment of foreign
currency guaranteed deposits of liquidated banks back in hryvnia). The trend is
expected to increase because of the return of trust to the public (estimated
money “under the mattresses” US$6-10 billion).
▪ Potential for high commission income
Commission income in 2016 amounted to US$922 million representing 34% of
the total banking revenue (25% for banks with foreign capital) exceeding the
average of the European banks. The most significant types of commission are
related to foreign exchange and money transfers. The difference in the share of
commissions in the banking revenue between the banks with foreign capital and
the banking sector average is mainly due to the fact that state owned banks are
the exclusive banking providers for the government organisations. There are
actions from the Banks’ Association to change to ratings criteria to introduce
fair competition.
In 2016 total commissions returned 2.8% on assets. Considering that the
sector’s balance comprises 37% cash and securities, this return is deemed high.
In general Ukrainians are accustomed to high commissions and in paying for
services. Commission income is expected to grow even further as exports and
disposable income would be growing.
▪ Consolidation prospect
Opportunity to participate in the forthcoming consolidation of the sector,
ripping the benefits of acquiring customers from state owned banks at least and
grow organically.
9
Ukrsib bank
I have considered a number of banks (Appendix I) and given my experience in the
country, Ukrsib is my top choice for the following reasons:
▪ Image of a European reliable, ethical, healthy bank with good electronic
banking solutions (Top 5 in 2017) servicing first class corporate customers and
their employees. The shareholders comprise BNP Paribas (60%) and EBRD
(40%).
▪ Good coverage ratio of problematic loans, a practice of French banks we have
observed in many occasions with recent experience in Greece with Credit
Agricole and Soc Gen.
The NPL ratio is 31% (EUR 301 million), less than the 36.4% average for
banks with foreign capital, and coverage of around 80%. From the 2016 audited
annual accounts, the remaining 20% net of reserves NPL portfolio is covered 4
times by collateral. The most problematic loans population has been that of
mortgages in foreign currency and it seems that Ukrsib has provisioned this part
adequately.
Loans portfolio quality
(31.12.2016)
€mn
Mortgage
s
Other
mortgages
Consumer
loans
Overdraf
ts
Other
loans
Total
Neither past due nor
impaired
High grade 0.2 5 0.1 508 513.
3
Medium grade 0
Low grade 4 4
Without ranking (up to 1
year)
Without ranking (1-10
years)
Without ranking (more
than 10 years)
Total neither past due
nor impaired
Past due but not
impaired
1 3 21 7 13.3 45.3
20 3 20 0.1 3 46.1
45 5 50
66.2 15 41 7.2 529.3 658.
7
10
less than 10 days
overdue
2 0.2 0.5 0.1 2.8
11-30 days overdue 1 0.1 0.2 1.3
31-90 days overdue 0.5 0.5
91-180 days overdue
181-360 days overdue
over 360 days overdue
Total past due but not
impaired
3 0.3 1.2 0.1 0 4.6
Loans to be impaired
not yet past due 5 13 0.7 27 45.7
less than 10 days
overdue
0.3 0.3 0.6
11-30 days overdue 0.1 0.1
31-90 days overdue 3 6 9
91-180 days overdue 4 11 0.4 15.4
181-360 days overdue 8 22 0.3 30.3
over 360 days overdue 149 20 2.5 0.6 28 200.
1
Total loans to be
impaired
Total loans before
provisions
169.4 66 3.9 0.6 61.3 301.
2
240 82 46 8 591 967
Provisions -140 -38 -5 -1 -55 -239
Net loans 100 44 41 7 536 728
11
Net Loans coverage by collateral value
(31.12.2016)
€mn
31th of December 2016 31th of December 2015
Assets
balance
value
Fair value of
collaterals
Assets
balance value
Fair value
of
collateral
s
Mortgages
Neither past due nor impaired 65 213 109 393
Past due but not impaired 3 12 10 27
Loans determined to be
impaired
31 168 104 242
Other mortgages
Neither past due nor impaired 15 62 78 192
Past due but not impaired 0.3 4 9 7
Loans determined to be
impaired
28 97 31 109
Consumer loans
Neither past due nor impaired 41 5 30 8
Past due but not impaired 1 0.2 1 0.3
Loans determined to be
impaired
0.1 2 0.3 2
Overdrafts
Neither past due nor impaired 7 2 6 4
Past due but not impaired 0.1 0.2
Loans determined to be
impaired
Other loans
Neither past due nor impaired 519 150 419 98
Past due but not impaired 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3
Loans determined to be
impaired
17.4 33 3 10
Total 728 748.3 800.6 1092.6
Total loans net of
impairment
76.5 300 138.3 363
Collateral coverage 392% 262%
12
▪ Large clientele of about 2 million customers (including 150,000 business
customers) serviced out of 378 branches with excellent retail product offering,
for which, however, the know-how contribution of Paris must have been
significant. They are also offering private banking and asset management
services in cooperation with their Swiss subsidiaries.
▪ They are leaders in trade finance, assisted by their operations in Switzerland.
They have corporate relations with the best local enterprises and they cross sell
their retail services to their customers and their partners.
Loans portfolio by sectors
€mn
31th of December 2016 31th of December 2015
€mn % €mn %
Individuals 319 33.0 374 39.6
Trade and finance 251 25.9 196 20.8
Agriculture and food industry 231 23.9 190 20.1
Telecommunication services 61 6.3 107 11.3
Transport services 47 4.9 2 0.2
Manufacturing 26 2.7 11 1.2
Chemical undustry 11 1.1 13 1.4
Construction 9 0.9 13 1.4
Transport vehicles trade 4 0.4 18 1.9
Gas and oil 4 0.4 12 1.3
Minning and metallurgy 3 0.3 3 0.3
Other 1 0.2 5 0.5
Total loans (before
provisions)
967 100.0 944 100.0
The product mix in the loans portfolio that is not in delay is 81% business and 19%
retail lending with business lending focusing in the agricultural sector.
▪ Excellent funding mix with the majority being current accounts at low cost.
13
Customer accounts
€mn
31th of
December
2016
31th of
December
2015
Current accounts
legal entities 301 303
individuals 624 489
Total current accounts 925 792
Term deposits
legal entities 276 349
individuals 80 129
Total term deposits 356 478
Total customer accounts 1281 1270
Customer accounts by sectors
€mn
31th of December 2016 31th of December 2015
€mn % €mn %
Individuals 406 32 417 33
Manufacturing 219 17 213 17
Trade 446 35 437 34
Financial services 96 8 91 7
Transport and connection 87 7 83 7
Culture and education services 17 1 17 1
Other 10 1 12 1
Total customer accounts 1281 101 1270 100
▪ High commissions covering their staff costs (2016: 112%). Net commissions
make up the 32% of their Net Banking Revenue and yielding 3% on Assets.
14
!
!
!
!
▪ The published financial statements for 1Q17 are “cleaner” in terms of “grossed
up” balances such as accruals of NPLs and therefore present a better base to
project 2017 financial results.
15
1Q 2017 P&L
€ mn
Ukrsibbank
Q1 2017 Q1 2016
Interest income 29 38
Interest expense -6 -14
Net interest income 23 24
Net commission income 12 10
Trading & other income 3 7
Employee costs -10 -9
Depreciation -1 -1
Administrative and other
operating costs
-6 -6
Other provisions 0 0
General & Admin.
Expenses
-18 -16
Pre Provision Income 20 25
Provision for loan
impairment
-9 -56
Profit before tax 11 -31
Income tax expense -2 -0
Net profit 8 -31
Please see summary of 2016 audited financial statements for Ukrsib, Ukrgas
and Raiffeisen as well as their 1Q17 statements in Appendix I.
▪ The bank is overcapitalised at 21.37% CAD mainly due to subordinated debt
provided by EBRD in USD during the years of crisis. About EUR 135 million
were outstanding at 1.5% (1Q17: EUR 104 million) with their contribution to
regulatory capital being EUR 73 million which is equivalent to 7.51% CAD
ratio. The minimum CAD required by NBU is 10%. 71% of the subordinated is
due to be repaid in 2019.
16
Regulatory Capital
€mn
31 December
2016
Tier 1 146,079
Additional Capital-Sub Debt 72,515
Deductions -12,167
Total Regulatory Capital 206,427
CAD Ratio 21.37%
Implied RWA 965,965
Regulatory Capital excluding
Additional 133,912
CAD Ratio Adjusted 13.86%
Due to the large interest margins and the high commissions, the capital to be
created from profits is growing faster than the reduction of the capital
contributed by the subordinated debt.
******************************************************************
Although Raiffeisen has already undergone a sales process twice, the last being 3
years ago, without success, I still consider the amount of its equity at EUR 350
million a very large amount to invest for gaining 0.8% more market share than that
of Ukrsib.
This information is as much I could gather but I will meet with EBRD for other
reasons and will try to extract more information mostly on the intentions of BNP in
dealing with their Ukrainian presence. From what I know EBRD’s 40% is
considered exceptionally high as equity participation percentage comparing to their
usual 10-15% and most probably they would be willing to listen to exit scenarios,
possibly remaining as shareholders at a lower percentage.
I think it is too early to discuss potential price but having EBRD inside already I
would assume that 1x less due diligence adjustments should be the maximum,
17
possibly around 0.8, with 0.5x being the floor. An indicative amount for buying the
90% of the shares with EBRD holding the remaining 10% should be in the region
of EUR 110 million.
I expect that an IRR greater than 25% can be achieved considering the profitability
of the current assets at c. EUR 50 million excluding trading gains, the additional
profitability from organic expansion in lending at the levels assumed by IMF for
the banking market and assuming that the exit from the investment will be
achieved at the same multiple as that of the entry level (0.8x).
I am available at any time to discuss the above. Should your investors be interested
in the project I would be more than happy to meet them and arrange their meeting
with EBRD. The next step following our meeting with EBRD would be to meet
BNP and, in case they accept a bilateral process, to arrange and manage the deal
process. As discussed my main objective is to lead manage the bank with a
competent management team, to be compensated by “sweat equity”, and looking
forward to be a major participant in the consolidation of the industry.
I will also send to you the latest benchmarking review of the banking sector we are
preparing for your perusal.
Best regards,
Yannis
18
Appendix 1 -2016 Balance Sheet
€ mn
Assets 31 /
12/16
Cash and cash
equivalents, banking
metals
Accounts in NBU and
other banks
Ukrsibbank Ukrgasbank Raiffeisen Bank Aval
31 /
12/15
31 /
12/16
31 /
12/15
31 /
12/16
31 /
12/15
68 475 88 152 362 480
561 9 229 353 358 244
Derivatives 0 0 0 1 0 0
Loans and advances to
customers
728 799 716 535 985 964
Trading securities 0 0 14 0 28 9
Investment securities
available-for-sale
Investment securities
held-to-maturity
Securities at fair value
through profit or loss
Fixed and intangible
assets
136 252 704 318 0 0
0 0 35 115 0 0
0 0 0 0 74 77
45 45 53 44 83 98
Investment property 1 0 2 2 4 6
Investments in
subsidiaries
0 13 0 0 2 8
Assets held-for-sale 0 0 40 37 2 0
Deferred income tax
assets and current
income tax prepayment
Other financial and
non-financial assets
38 43 3 3 39 50
20 19 13 11 33 20
Total assets 1,596 1,656 1,897 1,585 1,970 1,954
Liabilities
Due to NBU and other
banks
1 0 59 354 22 88
Derivatives 2 0 1 1 0 0
Customer accounts 1,282 1,270 1,625 1,049 1,561 1,523
Provisions for liabilities
and other liabilities
33 26 26 17 33 24
Subordinated debt 135 291 0 0 0 80
Total liabilities 1,452 1,587 1,710 1,421 1,616 1,715
19
Equity
Share capital 178 68 487 528 217 235
Acquired property
rights on shares
Result of operations
with shareholders
0 0 -18 -20 0 0
0 0 -39 -42 0 0
Emission differences 29 31 0 0 0 0
Additional paid-in
capital
0 0 5 5 107 116
Other provisions 0 0 21 -5 44 50
Retained profit/losses -63 -30 -269 -303 -13 -162
Net equity 144 69 186 164 354 239
Total liabilities and
equity
1,596 1,656 1,897 1,585 1,970 1,954
Appendix 1 –2016 Profit & Loss €
mn
20
Ukrsibbank Ukrgasbank Raiffeisen Bank
Aval
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Interest income 142 157 193 134 232 237
Interest expence -44 -65 -167 -106 -58 -86
Net interest income 98 93 25 28 174 151
Net commission
income
46 61 12 8 67 65
Trading&other income 20 12 -0 -1 30 25
Employee costs -38 -40 -20 -16 -53 -50
Depreciation -6 -8 -4 -2 -12 -13
Administrative and
other operating costs
-23 -29 -22 -18 -50 -50
Other provisions 0 0 -1 -5 -9 0
General & Admin.
Expenses
-67 -76 -48 -41 -124 -113
Pre Provision Income 98 90 -11 -5 147 129
Provision for loan
impairment
-127 -93 20 17 1 -191
Profit before tax -33 1 9 12 147 -62
Income tax expense -2 -0 1 -2 -13 7
Net profit -35 1 10 10 134 -55
21
Appendix 1 -1Q17 Balance Sheet
€ mn
Ukrsibbank Ukrgasbank Raiffeisen Bank
Aval
31/3/1
7
31/3/16 31/3/1
7
31/3/16 31/3/1
7
31/3/16
Assets
Cash and cash
equivalents, banking
metals
Accounts in NBU and
other banks
73 68 124 88 466 362
471 561 260 229 253 358
Derivatives 0 0 0 0 0 0
Loans and advances to
customers
663 728 727 716 1,005 985
Trading securities 0 0 13 14 36 28
Investment securities
available-for-sale
Investment securities
held-to-maturity
Securities at fair value
through profit or loss
Fixed and intangible
assets
137 136 972 704 0 0
0 0 0 35 0 0
0 0 0 0 93 74
45 45 52 53 82 83
Investment property 1 1 2 2 4 4
Investments in
subsidiaries
0 0 0 0 2 2
Assets held-for-sale 0 0 38 40 2 2
DTA and inc. tax prepay. 35 38 2 3 28 39
Other financial and nonfinancial
assets
16 20 11 13 20 33
Total Assets 1,440 1,596 2,201 1,897 1,992 1,970
Liabilities
Due to NBU and other
banks
0 1 54 59 18 22
Derivatives 0 2 0 1 0 0
Customer accounts 1,162 1,282 1,956 1,625 1,547 1,561
22
Provisions for liabilities
and other liabilities
24 33 17 26 29 33
Subordinated debt 104 135 0 0 0 0
Total Liabilities 1,290 1,452 2,027 1,710 1,594 1,616
Equity
Share capital 175 178 478 487 213 217
Acquired rights on
shares
Result of operations with
shareholders
0 0 -18 -18 0 0
0 0 -38 -39 0 0
Emission differences 28 29 0 0 0 0
Additional paid-in
capital
0 0 5 5 105 107
Other provisions 0 0 11 21 43 44
Retained profit/losses -53 -63 -263 -269 38 -13
Total Equity 150 144 174 186 398 354
Total Liabilities and
Equity
1,440 1,596 2,201 1,897 1,992 1,970
23
Appendix 1 -1Q17 P&L € mn
€ mn
Ukrsibbank Ukrgasbank Raiffeisen Bank Aval
Q1 2017 Q1 2016 Q1 2017 Q1 2016 Q1 2017 Q1 2016
Interest income 29 38 51 43 57 55
Interest expense -6 -14 -36 -37 -10 -17
Net interest
income
Net commission
income
Trading & other
income
23 24 15 5 46 39
12 10 4 2 17 13
3 7 4 -17 7 10
Employee costs -10 -9 -6 -4 -14 -12
Depreciation -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 -3
24
Administrative and
other operating
costs
-6 -6 -6 -4 -12 -11
Other provisions 0 0 -4 -0 -1 -0
General & Admin.
Expenses
Pre Provision
Income
Provision for loan
impairment
-18 -16 -17 -9 -31 -27
20 25 6 -19 39 35
-9 -56 -5 20 22 -10
Profit before tax 11 -31 1 1 61 25
Income tax expense -2 -0 -1 -0 -11 -2
Net profit 8 -31 1 1 50 23
25
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030742.txt,"From: Michael Wolff 
Sent: 5/30/2019 11:13:27 AM 
To: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: privleged 
1 
Importance: High 
Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with 011ie? 
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
lots of reporters inquiries. !. do i think that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did i 
speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding. I was the 
stalking horse bid. . never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in 
someones home. every girl got money. returned. most interviewed by police over 21. all public record. . 
some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. do i have to wear a tie? 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030742 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016245.txt,"THE LIMITATIONS OF OPAQUE LEARNING MACHINES
Judea Pearl

Judea Pearl is a professor of computer science and director of the Cognitive Systems
Laboratory at UCLA. His most recent book, co-authored with Dana Mackenzie, is The
Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect.

As a former physicist, I was extremely interested in cybernetics. Though it did not utilize
the full power of Turing Machines, it was highly transparent, perhaps because it was
founded on classical control theory and information theory. We are losing this
transparency now, with the deep-learning style of machine learning. It is fundamentally a
curve-fitting exercise that adjusts weights in intermediate layers of a long input-output
chain.

I find many users who say that it “works well and we don’t know why.” Once
you unleash it on large data, deep learning has its own dynamics, it does its own repair
and its own optimization, and it gives you the right results most of the time. But when it
doesn’t, you don’t have a clue about what went wrong and what should be fixed. In
particular, you do not know if the fault is in the program, in the method, or because things
have changed in the environment. We should be aiming at a different kind of
transparency.

Some argue that transparency is not really needed. We don’t understand the
neural architecture of the human brain, yet it runs well, so we forgive our meager
understanding and use human helpers to great advantage. In the same way, they argue,
why not unleash deep-learning systems and create intelligence without understanding
how they work? I buy this argument to some extent. I personally don’t like opacity, so I
won’t spend my time on deep learning, but I know that it has a place in the makeup of
intelligence. I know that non-transparent systems can do marvelous jobs, and our brain is
proof of that marvel.

But this argument has its limitation. The reason we can forgive our meager
understanding of how human brains work is because our brains work the same way, and
that enables us to communicate with other humans, learn from them, instruct them, and
motivate them in our own native language. If our robots will all be as opaque as
AlphaGo, we won’t be able to hold a meaningful conversation with them, and that would
be unfortunate. We will need to retrain them whenever we make a slight change in the
task or in the operating environment.

So, rather than experimenting with opaque learning machines, I am trying to
understand their theoretical limitations and examine how these limitations can be
overcome. I do it in the context of causal-reasoning tasks, which govern much of how
scientists think about the world and, at the same time, are rich in intuition and toy
examples, so we can monitor the progress in our analysis. In this context, we’ve
discovered that some basic barriers exist, and that unless they are breached we won’t get
areal human kind of intelligence no matter what we do. I believe that charting these
barriers may be no less important than banging our heads against them.

Current machine-learning systems operate almost exclusively in a statistical, or
model-blind, mode, which is analogous in many ways to fitting a function to a cloud of
data points. Such systems cannot reason about “what if ?” questions and, therefore,

25

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016245
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013774.txt,"Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A. (1997a) Entropy conservation as hy. ~ 1d, in

neurobiological dynamical systems. Chaos 7:67-81

Mandell, A.J. and Selz, K.A. (1997b) Is the EEG a strange attractor? Brainstem
neuronal discharge patterns and electroencehphalographic rhytms in (ed. Grebogi,
C., Yorke, J) The Impact of Chaos on Science and Society United Nations
University Press, Tokyo, pp 64-96

Mandell, A.J., Selz, K.A., Shlesinger, M.F. (1991) Some comments on the weaving
of contemporaneous minds: Resonant neuronal quasiperiodicity, period adding and
O(2) symmetry in the EEG In (ed. Pritchard W., Duke, D.) Chaos in the Brain World
Scientific Singapore pp 136-155

Manneville, P., Pomeau, Y. (1980): Different ways to turbulence in dissipative
systems. Physica 1D:219-226

Mantegna, R.N. (1991) Levy walks and enhanced diffusion in Milan stock exchange.
Physica A 179:232-242

Martinerie, J.,Adam, C., Le Van Quyen, M., Baulac, M., Clemenceau, S., Renault,
B., Varela, F.J. (1998) Epileptic seizures can be anticipated by non-linear analysis

Nat Med 4:1173-1176

May, R.M. (1976): Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics.
Nature 261:459-467

Mayer-Kress, G. (1986) Dimensions and Entropies in Chaotic Systems. Springer-
Verlag. N.Y.

274

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013774
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019739.txt,"CHAPTER 24
Off to Moscow

They talk about Russia like it’s the worst place on earth. Russia’s
great.

—EDWARD SNOWDEN, Moscow, 2015

EFORE FLYING TO Moscow, I arranged to have dinner with

Oliver Stone at an Italian restaurant on the Upper East Side of
New York. I had greatly respected Stone’s ability as a film director
after watching him work on Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, a film
in which I had a cameo role. I had also debated Stone about the his-
torical accuracy of his 1991 movie JFK at Town Hall in New York.

When we dined, he had just written, produced, and directed
Snowden, an independently financed film depicting Snowden, as
Stone put it, as “one of the great heroes of the twenty-first century.”
In preparing for it, Stone had seen Snowden in 2013 and 2014 and
had had a six-hour meeting with Putin.

I wanted to talk to Stone not to learn about the film but to learn
how he had gained access to Snowden in Moscow. I knew from the
documents taken from Sony Pictures Entertainment—allegedly by
North Korea—that Stone had paid The Guardian $700,000 for the
film rights to The Snowden Files, a book written by Luke Harding.

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 251 ® 9/30/16 8:13AM | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019739
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029213.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 9/19/2014 7:48:29 PM 
To: Kathy Ruemmler 
Subject: Re: Fwd: 
Importance: High 
if you have a chance 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Kathy Ruemmler < 
Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way. 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
of course not, he wouldnt have been so stupid. 
----------Forwarded message---------- 
From: Kathy Ruemmler 
Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM 
Subject: Re: 
To: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Gov is not jewish 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
reid or governor 
> wrote: 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Kathy Ruemmler < wrote: 
Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair. 
On Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
double whoops 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Kathy Ruemmler 
Yep. And now he is a repeat offender. 
On Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kathy Ruemmler < 
Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts. 
On Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM, ""Kathy Ruemmler"" 
> wrote: 
> wrote: 
'1=1 
> wrote: 
Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC 
today, back in NY on Sunday morning. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot 
in surgery, and the 
""cook"" well' -- he can wait 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kathy Ruemmler < 
> wrote: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029213 
Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage 
all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get 
sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
""girls?""„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, 
jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( 
gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome 
guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate 
summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kathy Ruemmler < > wrote: 
Most girls do not have to worry about this crap. 
On Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. 
and financial 
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Kathy Ruemmler < > wrote: 
Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him. 
Sent from my iPad 
On Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM, ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
You need to talk to boss 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029214 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029215 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029216 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029217 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029292.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029292
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025429.txt,"Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2019-02-27111 
on 2019-02-27 at 07.55.00.ichat 
Service: iMessage 
Start Time: 02/27/19 04:55:00 AM (572964900) 
End Time: 02/27/19 08:14:54 PM (573020094) 
Last Message ID: 25663 
Chat Room: 
Participants: jee, 
Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com, 
Messages - 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 04:55:00 AM (572964900) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: El6EF7AF-1B9C-4E41-BED3-BC93A7E203EA 
Message: He'll talk about his grades 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 04:56:11 AM (572964971) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: A4E275B9-271D-42EC-A6AE-4339D4601667 
Message: what privilege stands behind the none release of college transcripts? 0 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 07:02:58 AM (572972578) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 3E7C2A92-D63D-4D91-8734-23709303B2OB 
Message: Great outfit 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 07:22:08 AM (572973728) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 76426F42-04B1-45CD-B4A7-CEE4B8B343DD 
Message: You look great 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025429 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 07:22:24 AM (572973744) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2FCBE738-3D79-4939-989F-DEC095D784DA 
Message: Thanks! 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 07:41:42 AM (572974902) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8FD4DCDD-87AE-475E-860E-1346E9D9D6B2 
Message: Are you chewing 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 07:42:05 AM (572974925) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 1D6EDBE0-437D-477D-A1A5-8EDC867ECCC8 
Message: Not any more 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 07:42:15 AM (572974935) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: BDB8DA0A-DO6A-42A9-B7B7-5C11BA6BEFA1 
Message: :) 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 07:44:54 AM (572975094) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 4BB520CD-4EFF-4B4A-A6DB-7FCED3CFCE45 
Message: Chewing interior of my mouth. Bad habit from middle school 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 07:45:38 AM (572975138) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025430 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7A66020B-E39D-4FE4-BE8C-AC162755DE60 
Message: Sweet 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 09:25:36 AM (572981136) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7AE4B76F-91E7-4CDE-ACCB-A38C32E40045 
Message: Hes opened the door to questions re who are the other henchmen at trump org 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 09:26:15 AM (572981175) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: C47D56D3-9C10-41FA-BEC2-643964FC7F85 
Message: Yup. Very aware and waiting my turn 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 09:50:02 AM (572982602) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 38933E59-820C-4F52-9A74-D4A3A86C6CF3 
Message: How much longer for you 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 09:50:36 AM (572982636) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 1E15DD25-CO4C-46C2-BFCF-44E6781773A8 
Message: Hours. Go to other mtgs 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 09:57:55 AM (572983075) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025431 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 799AF8A4-80E4-4B49-92BD-21DOCB716AF5 
Message: Thx 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 11:24:25 AM (572988265) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8D544208-6C75-47A1-A7E3-915C14443FCD 
Message: Cohen brought up RONA - keeper of the secrets 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 11:25:00 AM (572988300) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 51AFF675-9AF3-4D96-BBOF-97AA390554FA 
Message: RONA?? 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 11:25:41 AM (572988341) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 110C0450-08FF-4A46-960B-7744F9A0CBD8 
Message: Quick I'm up next is that an acronym 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 11:26:07 AM (572988367) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 5E9AFF26-5F56-4A7B-8518-8CE7BE0E1B35 
Message: Thats his assistant 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 11:26:18 AM (572988378) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 92113168-10DE-4485-985B-0A3D1051AD3E 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025432 
Message: Rona 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 11:27:03 AM (572988423) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 05C23DF8-E908-4892-B399-B94A818F3DD1 
Message: ""She called out rodger is on line 1"" corroborater 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 11:34:43 AM (572988883) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 22729FF3-691B-415C-ACBE-5F47FD50D4E5 
Message: Good work 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 11:59:50 AM (572990390) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: Al0A4F49-5D6A-4162-9ABO-56C78C512F54 
Message: Financial statement exhibit???? Wild 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 12:12:00 PM (572991120) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: E7B78AA8-7DFC-473D-9B73-7F772CE9CD9C 
Message: Wild!! 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 01:19:29 PM (572995169) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 869E18BC-OF91-4D08-8CB1-E35E70617455 
Message: The titles of each section are misleading. It talks about asset value, and 
then related loans. And then loans payable. These are all tricks 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025433 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 01:20:09 PM (572995209) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 36293000-88A9-4F06-9D07-6D65C17B7410 
Message: Assets owned less than 100 percent? Operating property? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 02:26:46 PM (572999206) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: DCE20201-73B2-4DCB-BD97-CF819AA40A51 
Message: What were your takeaways? 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 02:42:54 PM (573000174) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 046E4F5D-73D4-4689-BF26-EE41B662DE75 
Message: Thinking. 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 07:00:10 PM (573015610) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 30400607-2686-4676-BCF1-1DF9D6005588 
Message: Was It fun 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 07:06:15 PM (573015975) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: D7678BD4-21F6-45AA-8A5C-4B2AF3B16368 
Message: No 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/27/19 08:11:45 PM (573019905) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025434 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 0295D722-A710-4BE2-9C93-D101D97596B7 
Message: were you surprised by the rabid republican defense 
Sender: 
Time: 02/27/19 08:14:54 PM (573020094) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 54762CB4-2482-4F63-9CE1-501E493C929A 
Message: Of course not 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025435 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015994.txt,"304 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?

time. Often, if a problem seems impossible, he will sleep on it. When he
wakes the next morning, he will frequently find the problem has solved
itself and a solution is ready at hand.

Art

The final class of creative thinking we generally recognize is artistic skill.
This is probably a form of convergent thinking, except both the problem
and the solution are open. Good artists are considered highly creative
and most people tend to agree on what constitutes good art. There are
some arguments but they are usually more about genres. I might not
appreciate modern installation art, even to the point of declaring it, “not
art” But, when forced to ignore their prejudices most people tend to
agree on the distinction between good and bad.

Painting, sculpture, music, architecture and poetry are the
traditional fine arts. There is often some argument over architecture: is
it not too ‘functional to be considered an artistic endeavor? After all,
art is not supposed to have any purpose other than to be, well, art. This
definition inevitably leads to arguments about whether bad art is still ‘art’
Art should be artful and how do you arrange a pile of used tires artfully?
But this isa very narrow definition. I prefer to define art as something that
provokes an emotional response in the beholder. Using this definition,
the fact that a pile of tires disgusts and annoys you is exactly the point.
Perhaps a more ‘enlightened’ viewer than you is intrigued by the clever
use of materials.

Regardless, we consider art to be a creative endeavor and we can
measure it using the criteria of novelty and quality. Since most people
agree on these measures for a given piece of art, we can use the wisdom
of crowds to give us a scientific scale. That does not mean there won't be
art that you love but which leaves me cold. That is the joy of it. Novelty
and quality are not the same as joy and pleasure, far less the tingle factor.

A quick test for artistic skill is to take a pen and paper and turn to
the person sitting on your left and try to sketch them.

TRY IT!

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015994
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Attachments: 
Paul Morris [1111111111111111110111114111111111114] 
3/14/2014 10:27:39 PM 
Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Re: Oil options [C] 
graycol.gif 
Importance: High 
Classification: Confidential 
I do want to talk to u about this, they spent too much thinking about options here, let me know when u have couple minutes. 
Vinit Sahni 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Vinit Sahni 
Sent: 03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Cc: Paul Morris 
Subject: Fw: Oil options 
Classification: External Communication 
Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time well be much quicker. 
Nay Gupta 
Original Message----- 
From: Nay Gupta 
Sent: 03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT 
To: njeevacation@gmail.com"" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Cc: Tazia Smith; Paul Morris/db/ 
Subject: Oil options 
Jeffrey 
Vinit Sahni/db/IIIIIIIIIIII 
Just got off the phone with Vinit. 
DB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated Pd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and 
out. 
My central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in ""yes"" given 
the 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is 
raised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show 
Merkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from 
Russia. Germany gets 30%. 
Cross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each 
other past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused 
on European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up. 
Exchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est): 
5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92 
and 
35d expiry 16apri12014 underlying clk4 97.59 
** The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM 
100 call for 25. Net pay Scents. But 5d is a bit short for me. 
**For 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c 
(4.5usd OTM) for 76cents. 
CL1 <comdty> OMON on Bloomberg has live strikes and bid/ask. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022346 
If 5d is too short and 35d is too long / not enough gamma, Tazia may be able to source liquidity from the street. Am Cc'ing her for any 
live pricing or additional comment 
Best 
Nay 
This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this communication 
in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this 
communication. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the 
material in this communication is strictly forbidden. 
Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the information 
contained in this communication should not be regarded as such. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022347 
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032725.txt,"From: Richard Kahn rr

Sent: 1/29/2018 2:39:14 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Term Sheet

Importance: — High

Not sure if realistic but trump may impact 5g and not sure if net positive or negative for this potential
investment.

https://www.cnbe.com/2018/01/28/trump-administration-could-build-nationalized-5 g-mobile-network.html

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

Tl)

Fox

Cel

On Jan 25, 2018, at 4:11 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Greg

Date: Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:07 PM

Subject: Term Sheet

To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>

Hi Jeff,

I realize the last term sheet was a draft, my fault (my computer syne’d the draft with the same name).

Here is a correct version, the last page is the signature page. It would be great if I could get this back
tomorrow. Nothing is due until the recap is complete, hopefully in about 4 weeks. I am planning to start those
discussions the end of next week.

Things are going well. The more I learn the more excited I get. I will be at Tarana tomorrow
discussing a window mount version to try to get to self-install. 1gbps in a self-install package would be the last
step.

We will only need a tower ever 4-5km in the city, which is basically 2 or 3 rooftops for all of Boston.
I met with American Tower today (I know their CEO and CTO) and they have plenty of room on the John
Hancock.

Fun Stuff and great to be doing something together!

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032725
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031094.txt,"Now, ain't that simple? They don't know each other and they never met!
How is that possible? 'cause they said so! And don't forget it!

P.S. If you pass this on to your friends, don't forget, you know nothing and they will
know nothing.

David Gibson, M.D. Chicago

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest * Unsubscribe » Terms of Use

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031094
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025112.txt,"Following are the key areas of breakthrough in sleep and dreams (from Patrick). Patrick states that these are
now reproducible, non-controversial, and well-accepted among experts, although still not appreciated by the
public - hence the high value of our CTT TV series. The organizing idea is why and how are sleep and
dreams essential for normal memory consolidation and bodily health / well-being.

Memory Consolidation. There is a fundamental difference between REM and NREM Sleep for memory
consolidation: REM is for emotional memories, whereas NREM is for declarative and procedural memories.
Hence, understanding and dealing with REM emotional memories can lead to treatment for the many
neuropsychiatric illnesses that have sleep/dream-related disorders or syndromes (Parkinson’s Disease,
Anxiety, Substance Abuse, many sleep disorders such as Nightmare Disorder, etc., in addition to PTSD and
Depression). Research shows bi-directional causality between neuropsychiatric disorders and sleep disorders.
This is a superb example of how fundamental science breakthroughs lead to clinical breakthroughs. This fact
that REM is associated with emotional memories is nicely consistent with the apparent psychotic nature of
dreams, because in REM Sleep the frontal cortex is ‘down-regulated’ (and the frontal cortex is associated
with rational planning, reflection, controlling impulses), while in REM Sleep the limbic system is ‘up-
regulated” (and the limbic system is associated with emotions and feelings) — see Neuroimaging below. This
is why dream states flood the ego with emotional fantasies without rational control. However, it is also true
that the limbic system enables creative ideas, thus grounding in science the long-suspected idea that sleep
and dreams can enhance creativity.

As Dr. Robert Stickgold, our other advisor on the series, wrote: “It would be nice if we could talk about sleep
and memory as if there were only one type of memory and one type of sleep. But this is far from the case.
Sleep and memory each comes in many forms, and furthermore, memories can go through multiple forms of
post-encoding processing that must be individually addressed.”

Immunity / Immune System. Strengthening the immune system is now a proven product of NREM sleep.
Discerning the evolutionary basis for this is a key research project (1.e., it seems counter-intuitive

that sleeping facilitates fitness for survival in that predators lurked in the jungles and on the plains so that
going unconscious during sleep does not, at first glance, seem especially adaptive). Studies of sleep in
various non-human animals reveals a direct relationship between longer periods of NREM (Slow-Wave)
Sleep and a stronger immune system, especially in fighting parasites. NREM Sleep releases molecules that
fight inflection; NREM Sleep works for the maintenance, repair and activation of the immune system. (This
gives scientific rationale for the need or desire to sleep during illnesses.) Related are “genetic conflict”
studies with respect to REM and NREM, showing differences in heredity between material and paternal
lines, and differences between males and females in which genes get “imprinted”.

Neuroplasticity. Exciting recent research has reversed the century-long conventional wisdom that new
neurons are never created in adult animals/humans. The development of new neurons — neuronogenesis — is a
vital part of maintaining normal brain and mental functioning. New neurons are being created, importantly,
in the hippocampus (brain organ where new memories are encoded) — but, remarkably, the neuronogensis in
the hippocampus occurs only/largely during REM Sleep — a stunning finding. This is another reason why
REM sleep is needed for emotional memory consolidation (normal functioning).

Dream-Content. Although dreams have sparked human fascination and fantasy for thousands of years, only
in very recent years, have large-scale surveys been conducted with rigorous design, classifications and
statistical analysis. Literally hundreds of thousands of dreams are enabling statistically significant theories,
including cross-cultural analyses (similarities and differences). Dream-posting sites have revolutionized size
and structure of dream data sets. This enables, for the first time, longitudinal studies of dreams over time.
Patterns are repeated. For example, in general, the dreams of males and females differ in fundamental ways.
Males will engage in fighting with other males; females with both males and females. Male dreamers

are often the initiator of fights and the fights are usually physical. Females fight verbally. Aggressiveness

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025112
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023240.txt,". Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :

I have taken heat for years over the fact that i gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up
questions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. (that was Eileen _)
but somehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . _ when i told you that i thought Eileen wasn't up to the
task, you bellowed that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by
trying to protect you from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his
work. it then turns out that he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and
continued to make a really dangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes , was also my doing , though
email after email said , I take no responsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM |!!! , your
response was that was my opinion was only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan
you told me he was gone. however he too is still there, and a waste of money and space.

My time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the
foreign funds repatriation plan that i had put together. . however as you are aware I have some decisions
to make re my time allocation in the next year or two. so at least for a few weeks I am unable to commit
much time and make any future plans to guide you in the redoing of your procrastination produced
mess.

That being said, the tasks at hand are the following.
You have a bomb of colored string that your retarded children have formed , It has to be very carefully
unwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It
would be much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??! . I
am concerned re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn
ACCURATE . org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are all a part. Barry will need 2
months to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,

a way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts ,
filing requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how
they fit into new plan. . ""XXXXX"" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying

another. .? boat sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an
accounting system. fire john... joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather
everyone should be replaced withnew. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash
flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take
months to review now. . you CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! _ this will
be very detailed work. . a self inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit .
or contain it. . . you will need 3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I
have great hope in Barry as you know. He will need to be trained. note

; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im
glad that you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the
fact that after only one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a
year or more.

I expect as a friend you will understand that

I will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long
overdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul
weiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, ,no one. needs toend.. you and I
had previously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be
fair I can not say im surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of
money, you wont want to pay , so limit it to 40m per year. - water under the bridge

If I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as I have said, I

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023240
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025674.txt,"Investment Saal

Management

As Bitcoin Ownership is Not Anonymous, Illicit Use has Fallen _ Division

Larry Fink on Bitcoin’s Illicit Use

""Bitcoin just shows you how much demand for money
laundering there is in the world. That’: all it is. It's an

index of money laundering.”

— BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, October 13, 2017

= Because bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous, users’ real-world identities are ascertainable once the individual
converts bitcoin to fiat currency.

= Digital intelligence companies continually scan the blockchain to identify suspicious transaction activity.

"" The Blockchain Intelligence Group estimates that illegal transactions in bitcoin fell from ~50% of total volume in 2015
to ~20% in 2016, and represent “significantly less than that” today.

= As law enforcement has become better able to track bitcoin ransom, cybercriminals have begun to favor currencies that
allow anonymity, such as Monero and Zcash, and even Ether.

Source: Investment Strategy Group, Blockchain Intelligence Group, https://www.cnbc.com/201 7/08/29/dark-web-finds-bitcoin-increasingly-more-of-a-problem-than-a-help-tries-other- rl
digital-currencies.html.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025674
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023526.txt,"10

that Hamas has a regional focus, while al Qaeda's is global. Hamas
bears no love for the United States, but it has not deliberately targeted
Americans. Al Qaeda, of course, sees the United States as its primary
enemy, and it doesn't stop there. European countries, supposed
enemies of Islam such as Russia and India, and Arab regimes of all
stripes are on their hit list. Other components of the ""Salafi-jihadist""
movement (of which al Qaeda is a part) focus operations on killing
Shiite Muslims, whom they view as apostates. Hamas, in contrast,
does not call for the overthrow of Arab regimes and works with
Shiite Iran and the Alawite-dominated secular regime in Damascus,
pragmatically preferring weapons, money, and assistance in training
to ideological consistency.

Hamas, like its parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, also
devotes much of its attention to education, health care, and social
services. Like it or not, by caring for the poor and teaching the next
generation of Muslims about its view of the world, Hamas is
fundamentally reshaping Palestinian society. Thus, many Palestinians
who do not share Hamas's worldview nonetheless respect it; in part
because the Palestinian moderates so beloved of the West have often
failed to deliver on basic government functions. The old Arab
nationalist visions of the 1950s and 1960s that animated the moderate
Palestinian leader Mahmood Abbas and his mentor Yasir Arafat have
less appeal to Palestinians today.

One of the greatest differences today, as the Arab spring raises the
hope that democracy will take seed across the Middle East, is that
Hamas accepts elections (and, in fact, took power in Gaza in part
because of them) while al Qaeda vehemently rejects them. For
Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Ladin's deputy and presumed heir-
apparent, elections put man's (and, even worse, woman's) wishes
above God's. A democratic government could allow the sale of
alcohol, cooperate militarily with the United States, permit women to

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023526
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024249.txt,"have—many obviously hope—the effect of derailing the
Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.

It is a curious attribute of his character that, other
than perhaps being more circumspect about what legal
advice to follow, Epstein would have done little
differently. (When I suggested recently to Epstein that
one obvious way to blunt the animus bearing down on
him would be to get married, he said he’d rather go back
to jail.) His life, living it as he wants, seems to him to be
an extraordinary accomplishment. Being on the wrong
side of morality, custom, politics, feminists, the media,
that’s just a bit of bad luck.

And it is perhaps this attitude of his that irks his
critics the most. Although he has spent more than a year
in jail and paid out what may be as much as $20 million,
he yet seems somehow to have gotten away with it—
that worst sin of all. He is the unrepentant catchall of
up-to-the-minute badness: the financier whose wealth is
a product of Wall Street math rather than work; a rich
middle-age white man who not only parades his wealth
and entitlement, but has a Peter Pan complex to boot; an
insistent playboy (excuse me, pedophile) in a correct
and prudish world—someone who somehow didn’t get
the memo about vast changes in mores and culture.

But Epstein’s friends—and I think that is, in the
end, the best word for the powerful people who orbit
him—are willing to take him as he comes. Epstein is
their confidant. Not the only nexus of them, but one of
them. Dr. Epstein. Lay on my couch. As he is

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024249
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026734.txt,"irreversibly impoverish our biosphere. Extinction rates are rising — we’re destroying
the book of life before we’ve read it.

Biodiversity is a crucial component of long-term human wellbeing. We're clearly
harmed if fish stocks dwindle to extinction; there are plants in the rain forest whose
gene pool might be useful to us. But for many environmentalists , preserving the
richness of our biosphere has value in its own right, over and above what it means to
us humans To quote the great ecologist EO Wilson ‘mass extinction is the sin that
future generations will least forgive us for’.

CLIMATE CHANGE

So the world’s getting more crowded. And there’s a second firm prediction: it will
gradually get warmer. In contract to population issues, climate change is certainly
not under-discussed — though it is under-acted-upon

The famous Keeling curve shows how the concentration of CO2 in the air is rising,
mainly due to the burning of fossil fuels .

The fifth IPCC report presented temperature- projections, for different assumptions
about future rates of fossil fuel use. For each such assumption there’s a spread
bevause it remains unclear how much the climatic effects of CO2 are amplified by
associated changes in water vapour and clouds — the so-called sensitivity factor.

IPCC PROJECTIONS

But despite these uncertainties the science tells is that under ‘business as usual’
scenarios we can’t rule out, by 2100, really catastrophic warming, and tipping points
triggering long-term trends like the melting of Greenland’s icecap.

Sadly, many deny this. But even among those who accept that this threat is real,
there is a range of views. These stem from differences in economics and ethics -- in
particular, in how much obligation we should feel towards future generations.

Bjorn Lomberg’s Copenhagen Consensus, for instance applies commercial-style
discounting -- and in effect writes off what happens beyond 2050. So, unsurprisingly
he downplays the priority of addressing climate change in comparison with shorter-
term efforts to help the world’s poor.

But if you care about those who'll live into the 22* century and beyond, then, as
economists like Stern and Weizman argue, you deem it worth paying an insurance

premium now, to protect those generations against the worst-case scenarios.

Above all, it depends on an ethical issue — in optimizing people’s life-chances, should
we discriminate on grounds of date of birth?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026734
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021778.txt,"So maybe Mr. Epstein is satisfied that he's getting his money's worth from his large
legal team, which includes Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz
(remember O.J. Simpson?) and Kenneth Starr (remember Monica Lewinsky?). Jack
Goldberger of West Palm Beach, who's also on the team, told Post columnist Jose
Lambiet in November: ""This case is absolutely going to end without a trial within
the next two months.”

He was wrong, but Mr. Goldberger remains on Mr. Epstein's payroll, feigning
moral outrage at two lawsuits filed this year against the Manhattan money
manager. The lawsuits allege sexual exploitation of teenaged girls, one of
them as young as 14. Said Mr. Goldberger after the first lawsuit, seeking
more than $50 million, was filed on Jan. 24: ""We think this shows what this
case is all about: money.” Yes, it is - Mr. Epstein's effort to buy his way out
of prosecution.

According to the lawyer of a 17-year-old whose parents are suing him, Mr. Epstein

masturbated in front of her (she was 14 at the time) and used a vibrator on her at his
home in February 2005. Another Epstein attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez dismissed it:

""Jeffrey Epstein did not have sex with this woman.""

For those girls who claim that he did, Mr. Epstein's lawyers maintain that he did not
know their ages, despite a police search of his home and garbage that found phone
messages about the girls' school schedules and even a high school transcript. For all of
his money, Mr. Epstein's best defense remains ""I didn't know that I was a criminal
pervert""?

Palm Beach Post Editorial #4

Rich man fought the law and he mostly won
Palm Beach Post Editorial

Monday, July 07, 2008

Two years after a grand jury indicted him on a felony charge of solicitation of
prostitution, Jeffrey Epstein finally admitted that he lured a teenage girl to his $8.5
million, 13,000-square-foot Palm Beach mansion for sex. A week ago, the 55-yearold
investment banker began serving 18 months in jail.

But that plea deal - guilty of felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a

person under the age of 18 for prostitution - does not account for all five of the girls,

one as young as 14, who alleged that Epstein sexually abused them. And why is Epstein
serving his term in the overcrowded Palm Beach County Jail and not a state prison, where
inmates are sent if their sentences are longer than one year?

The slow, dissatisfying resolution of the case sends a message to the public

Post your that there's a different system of justice for the wealthy who hire high-
comments powered lawyers. Epstein's legal team included West Palm Beach defense
on this attorney Jack Goldberger, Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021778
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016725.txt,"OGE Fonn 278 (March 2014)
Instructions for Part 6
Note: This is a public form. Do not include account numbers, street addresses, or family member names. See instructions for required information,

iler's Name Page Number
Donald J. Trump 7 _ 27 of 42

art 6: Other Assets and Income = = ""
ff [Description *(~RIF [Value ————_—‘iincome type [incomeAmount id

iz?

a)

‘ Interest, Dividends
e 1 ‘
Family Trust 2 Capital Gains

cuca | wwe

$15,001 - $50,000

SHARES CORE MSC EAFEET
5 |JPIMORGAN BETABUILDERS CANADA ETF | y | $1.001-815,000 |

SIX CIRCLES INTERNATIONAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY em
FUND _.
7 Janrisan wr. VALUE FANS

PM US L/C CORE PL FD - USD - R6 hiceocaiallacaiectia
EUBERGER BER MU/C OPP-INS eh - See

ad

RIMECAP ODYSSEY STOCK FD
SPDR S&P 500 ETF TRUST
SIX CIRCLES U.S. UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY FUND Fy | stsc01-ss0000 =|
LACKSTONE ALT MULTI-STRAT- Y Ly | stoo1-sis000 =|
RM LONG/SHORT OPPORTUNITIES FUND fy | stoor-sis000 [|

* J.P. Morgan is the sole Trustee. Donald J. Trump retains an income interest only in the Family Trusts and has no investment decision authority.

Ln

4

oO

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016725
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022638.txt,"March 27, 2014 at 4:19 pm — Log in to Reply

So this is why Commiecrats have been knocking on the door of legalized pedophilia.
I was wondering what was up.
Stay on this WJ.

eee

33.
michael

March 27, 2014 at 4:47 pm — Log in to Reply

Now we know what Prs Obama had on them

—————

34.
michael

March 27, 2014 at 4:50 pm — Log in to Reply
And with the help of Eric Holder and his DOJ (because its not ours) he can and did keep him out of jail

35.
Bob Bitchin'

March 27, 2014 at 5:10 pm — Log in to Reply

Oh Oh! Sounds like Billy Jeff may have really stepped in it this time. I doubt he will ever be prosecuted nor will
the mainline liberal biased news media ever carry any such story no matter what the proof.

Gee, maybe after OButtbreath leaves office, evidence will come out of his visit to HOMOsexual bath houses,
HOMOsexual rendezvous and relationships and dare I say? Evidence of pedophilia with underage boys.
OButtbreath has made many enemies as has his wife and the Clintons both. A bit coincidental that the last two
DEMONcratic Presidents in this country should be embroiled in such controversy.

——————

36.

Magic1808
March 27, 2014 at 5:10 pm — Log in to Reply

The laundry list of all the crimes committed by slick Willy are available at the following site. It’s amazing the
man is still so active in Washington, and the government. He often represents America in many activities. Iam
not surprised to learn of his involvement in Pedophilia, and is probably behind this push to legalize it. When are

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022638
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029575.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 11/26/2018 2:40:00 AM 
To: Lisa New 
Subject: Re: invitation 
Yes 
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 8:06 PM Lisa New <_______________ 
okay.... let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you. 
Can I call you tomorrow am? 
wrote: 
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
count how many times you say I or me? 
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM Lisa New wrote: 
Jeffrey, 
How's this 
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc 
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM Lisa New > wrote: 
Dear Jeffrey, 
Here is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. 
I'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to 
Australia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next 
time you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar 
themes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young 
girl. 
Thank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the ""bootleg"" 
episode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you 
were so kind to make it happen. 
Lisa 
Elisa New 
Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature 
Director, Poetry in America 
Harvard University 
148 Barker Center 
12 Quincy Street  
Cambridge, MA  
02138 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029575 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
Elisa New 
Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature 
Director, Poetry in America 
Harvard University 
148 Barker Center 
12 Quincy Street  
Cambridge, MA  
02138  
I 
i 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029576 
Elisa New 
Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature 
Director, Poetry in America 
Harvard University 
148 Barker Center 
12 Quincy Street  
Cambridge, MA  
02138  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029577 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013012.txt,"96 5 A Generic Architecture of Human-Like Cognition

data, rather than mainly embodying speculative notions; however, given the current state of
knowledge, this could not be done to a complete extent, and there is still some speculation
involved here and there.

While based on understandings of human intelligence, the integrative diagram is intended to
serve as an architectural outline for human-like general intelligence more broadly. For example,
CogPrime is explicitly not intended as a precise emulation of human intelligence, and does many
things quite differently than the human mind, yet can still fairly straightforwardly be mapped
into the integrative diagram.

The integrative diagram focuses on structure, but this should not be taken to represent a
valuation of structure over dynamics in our approach to intelligence. Following chapters treat
various dynamical phenomena in depth.

5.2 Key Ingredients of the Integrative Human-Like Cognitive
Architecture Diagram

The main ingredients we’ve used in assembling the integrative diagram are as follows:

e Our own views on the various types of memory critical for human-like cognition, and the
need for tight, ""synergetic"" interactions between the cognitive processes focused on these

e Aaron Sloman’s high-level architecture diagram of human intelligence [Slo01], drawn from
his CogAff architecture, which strikes me as a particularly clear embodiment of ""modern
common sense"" regarding the overall architecture of the human mind. We have added only
a couple items to Sloman’s high-level diagram, which we felt deserved an explicit high-level
role that he did not give them: emotion, language and reinforcement.

e The LIDA architecture diagram presented by Stan Franklin and Bernard Baars [BF 09].
We think LIDA is an excellent model of working memory and what Sloman calls ""reactive
processes"", with well-researched grounding in the psychology and neuroscience literature.
We have adapted the LIDA diagram only very slightly for use here, changing some of
the terminology on the arrows, and indicating where parts of the LIDA diagram indicate
processes elaborated in more detail elsewhere in the integrative diagram.

e The architecture diagram of the Psi model of motivated cognition, presented by Joscha
Bach in [Bac09] based on prior work by Dietrich Dorner [Dér02]. This diagram is presented
without significant modification; however it should be noted that Bach and Dorner present
this diagram in the context of larger and richer cognitive models, the other aspects of which
are not all incorporated in the integrative diagram.

e James Albus’s three-hierarchy model of intelligence [AMO1], involving coupled perception,
action and reinforcement hierarchies. Albus’s model, utilized in the creation of intelligent
unmanned automated vehicles, is a crisp embodiment of many ideas emergent from the field
of intelligent control systems.

e Deep learning networks as a model of perception (and action and reinforcement learning),
as embodied for example in the work of Itamar Arel [ARC09] and Jeff Hawkins [HB06]. The
integrative diagram adopts this as the basic model of the perception and action subsystems
of human intelligence. Language understanding and generation are also modeled according
to this paradigm.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013012
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022271.txt,"After hosting a few successful events, WE are planning a bigger and better event in
fall. In fact, WE are making a statement that women should not be judged based
on their external beauty and should be rewarded for their intellect and hard work.

The majority of our society still emphasizes the importance of female physical
qualities, such as beauty, body, or photogenic skills. Miss USA, the famous Beauty
Pageant previously owned by Donald Trump, until this summer required the
participants to pose in a swimsuit paired with high heels. Effective this year, the
show will abolish the bikini contest. We think that it is time to take one step
further and to finally start rewarding women for their mind, hard work, and
creativity.

Our idea is to host a “Beauty Pageant” for female entrepreneurs and to have the
top five finalists do a five-minute pitch in front of our jury. The finalists will not
only get a money prize, but also receive a significant exposure to investors and
media. We are hoping to get at least a few hundred applications as the application
is completely free. Female founders should have equal opportunities and
resources to their male counterparts. We hope that our event will encourage other
female entrepreneurs and help them advance in their careers.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022271
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028832.txt,"InsightsPod

Net Profit (or Loss) by Year

$600K
$400K
$200K

LT

($200K)

FY2017 FY2018 FY2019

Financing
Use of Funds

The total expense in Year 1 is around $548,000 and $624,000 in Year 2. The biggest
expense will be contracting of a PR/Marketing Agency. We have allocated $192,000 for
this.

We have allocated $103,000 per year for product development. The breakdown of this
amount is as follows:

e We plan to hire a Data Scientist who will be paid $24,000 per year. To reduce the
expense we will hire a Data Scientist in Pakistan. The current salary of an
experienced Data Scientist working for companies like Teradata and Telenor is
$2000-$2500 per month.

¢ Our development team in Pakistan will consist of five team members. The
salaries for our two senior developers will be $18,000 each, making that a total of
$36,000 per year. Our programmers will be paid $14,400 each per year, making
that a total of $43,200.

| Page 15 |

CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT DISSEMINATE. This business plan contains confidential, trade-secret
information and is shared only with the understanding that you will not share its contents or ideas with
third parties without the express written consent of the plan author.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028832
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032364.txt,"and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032364
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028775.txt,"From: Bob Crowe [ay

Sent: 3/11/2016 12:24:18 PM
To: jeevacation@gmail.com
Subject: FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade

Attachments: image001.gif

Robert B. Crowe Partner| Nelson Mullins
One Post Office Square, 30th FI., Boston, MA 02109
101 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20001

From: abuulabass [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:31 PM
To: Vinoda Basnayake; elisabeth feliho

Cc: Bob Crowe; Mohamed Seydou Diagne; El Hadji Amadou Sall
Subject: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade

Congratulations Vinoda ! The French version of the paper was published today in the Senegalese major
newspapers. You can see it also in Seneweb.com .

Many thanks for the good work with my best regards.

Tidiane

Envoyé depuis mon appareil Samsung

-------- Message d'origine --------

De : Vinoda Basnayake

Date : 02/03/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00)

A: elisabeth feliho

Cc : Bob Crowe q. Cheikh Tidianc Sy <a, Mohamed

Seydou Diagn: 7] Hadji Amadou Sall i
Objet : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade

We have had some positive feedback from the article. Now the issue certainly has more visibility in Washington. Bob is
in the process of setting up the meeting with Tom at the State Dept regarding the Human Rights Report for 2016. Will
send more as we get more details.

Vinoda

Vinoda Basnayake

Of Counsel and Chair of DC Government Relations

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028775
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011522.txt,"But a series of accidents, in Israel’s life and in mine, would soon point me in
a dramatically different direction. The first became known as the Rotem Crisis,
and it delivered a jolting reminder of Israel’s vulnerability to a surprise attack
from neighboring Arab states. Militarily, we were far stronger than in 1948. But
we were still a young country, at an early stage in our economic development.
Our defense strategy rested on a recognition we could not afford to sustain a
large standing army, relying instead on a pool of trained reservists. The problem
was that a full call-up of the reserves would require something like 48 hours.
That meant some form of early warning was critical.

Rotem erupted in February 1960, about halfway through my fironut, and
began almost farcically. The Chief of Military Intelligence, Chaim Herzog, was
at a diplomatic receiption in Tel Aviv when he began chatting with a guest he
knew well: the head of the local CIA station. What, the American asked, did he
make of the fact that Egypt had moved its two main armored divisions into the
Sinai, toward the border with Israel? Herzog came up with a suitably woolly
reply, about how it was obviously a situation which bore watching. But the truth
was that neither he nor anyone else in Israel had any idea about the Egyptian
mobilization. He left the party as soon as he could, to tell Dayan and Ben-
Gurion. When a reconnaissance flight the next day confirmed that dozens of
battle-ready tanks had been rolled forward toward the Suez Canal, Ben-Gurion
and the generals scrambled for a response.

They did not want a war. Ben-Gurion was particularly worried that in
responding to Nasser’s buildup, he might inadvertently escalate things further.
He vetoed the idea of a full mobilization. But he did order a more limited call-
up, of about 7,000 reservists. He placed the air force on alert. He directed the
four brigades responsible for the defense of southern Israel, including our
armored brigade near Beersheva, to move within a few miles of the border —
and gave us the additional role of sending several overnight munitions convoys
to equip the hastily assembled border force.

The first sign I saw that anything extraordinary was going on was the sudden
movement of tanks and APCs inside our camp. At first, no one told us raw
recruits anything. We were left to look on, and stay out of the way. But with our
operational units preparing to move forward, the problem was that there seemed
no one else with the expertise, experience and local knowledge to lead the
supply columns. So our training battalion was summoned before the platoon
commander. “Any volunteers,” he asked. When none of us raised a hand, he
said: “Come on. One of you must have grown up around here. That means the

51
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011522
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016862.txt,"potentials, which limits their spacing to a few 10s per second. It is probably
no accident that the “frame rate,” at which we can distinguish that movies are
actually a sequence of stills, is about 40 per second. Thus, electronic
processing is close to a billion times faster.

e Size: The linear dimension of a typical neuron is about 10 microns.
Molecular dimensions, which set a practical limit, are about 10,000 times
smaller, and artificial processing units are approaching that scale. Smallness
makes communication more efficient.

e Stability: Whereas human memory 1s essentially continuous (analog),
artificial memory can incorporate discrete (digital) features. Whereas analog
quantities can erode, digital quantities can be stored, refreshed, and
maintained with complete accuracy.

e Duty Cycle: Human brains grow tired with effort. They need time off to take
nourishment and to sleep. They carry the burden of aging. Most profoundly:
They die.

e Modularity (open architecture): Because artificial information processors can
support precisely defined digital interfaces, they can readily assimilate new
modules. Thus, if we want a computer to “see” ultraviolet or infrared or
“hear” ultrasound, we can feed the output from an appropriate sensor directly
into its “nervous system.” The architecture of brains is much more closed and
opaque, and the human immune system actively resists implants.

e Quantum readiness: One case of modularity deserves special mention,
because of its long-term potential. Recently physicists and information
scientists have come to appreciate that the principles of quantum mechanics
support new computing principles, which can empower qualitatively new
forms of information processing and (plausibly) new levels of intelligence.
But these possibilities rely on aspects of quantum behavior which are quite
delicate and seem especially unsuitable for interfacing with the warm, wet,
messy enviroment of human brains.

Evidently, as platforms for intelligence, human brains are far from optimal. Still,
although versatile housekeeping robots or mechanical soldiers would find ready, lucrative
markets, at present there is no machine that approaches the kind of general-purpose
human intelligence those applications would require. Despite their relative weakness on
many fronts, human brains have some big advantages over their artificial competitors.
Let me mention five:

e Three-dimensionality: Although, as noted, the linear dimensions of existing
artificial processing units are vastly smaller than those of brains, the procedure by
which they’re made—centered on lithography (basically, etching)—is essentially
two-dimensional. That is revealed visibly in the geometry of computer boards
and chips. Of course, one can stack boards, but the spacing between layers is
much larger, and communication much less efficient, than within layers. Brains
make better use of all three dimensions.

e Self-repair: Human brains can recover from, or work around, many kinds of
injuries or errors. Computers often must be repaired or rebooted externally.

59

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016862
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030573.txt,"New York Linkedin Prince Andrew Photos FastestFox Refinements [x]

Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein

Jeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science
and education philanthropist. He is responsible for founding The Program ...

Life - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution

Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery
nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

He's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of
the Limited, socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't ...

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator ...
www.nypost.con/.../perv_don_shmear_me_GzYVOfJYoWleF...

Feb 25, 2011 — Billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City -- and
making wisecracks about his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an ...

Home - JEFFREY EPSTEIN VI FOUNDATION
www.jeffreyepsteinfoundation.com/

Jeffrey Epstein, Holds a Conference of Nobel Laureates to Define Gravity ... The
conference was financed by science philanthropist Jeffrey Epstein and his ...

Jeffrey Epstein
www. huffingtonpost.com/news/jeffrey-epstein

Disgraced billionaire money manager (and former Bill Clinton associate) Jeffrey Epstein
is back in New York City after 13 months of jail time for soli.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN SCIENCE

www.jeffreyepsteinscience.com/

See this Go Daddy InstantPage®! http://jeffreyepsteinscience.com. Get yours free with a
domain name at GoDaddy.com. Investing in Scientific Education ...

Jeffrey Epstein Foundation

www.jeffreyepstein.org/

Jeffrey Epstein Philanthropy supports a wide range of innovative initiatives around the
world from education and youth programs to international peace accords ...

Miami Hair Transplant | New York Hair Replacement
www.foundhair.com/

By % by Jeffrey Epstein - More by Jeffrey Epstein

Dr. Jeffrey Epstein's expertise in hair restoration can greatly benefit male
patients experiencing varying degrees of hair loss. Men may seek a hair
restoration ...

Jeff Epstein profiles | Linkedin

us.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Jeff/Epstein

View the profiles of professionals named Jeff Epstein on Linkedin. There are 25
professionals named Jeff Epstein, who use Linkedin to exchange information, ...

Jeff N. Epstein, PhD
www.cincinnatichildrens.org/bio/e/jeff-epstein/

Jeff N. Epstein, PhD, is the director of the Center for ADHD and a professor of
pediatrics for the Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology at ...

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030573
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026873.txt,"RLK: Certainly that’s the objective. eijing | + Beijing

You're absolutely right: There's no
issue in American politics that the
all sides of the spectrum agree
upon more than on China. In fact,
on every other issue, one could say
from the Bernie Sanders / Elizabeth
Warren, Democrats on the left, to
Donald Trump Republicans on the

far right, they disagree on virtually — “Soa << See ° i
everything we can say except on <2

China. So that's the reality we are DEVELOPING STORY

aealinig wilt. JACK MA: TRADE WAR COULD LAST 20 YEARS Ffe\\)

Robert Lawrence Kuhn = Author, ""How China's Leaders Think"" | 7:40 pm oat j

QUEST MEANS
BUSINESS

November 2017

RLK: Nobody expects this to be ijing Beijing
resolved before the midterm
elections. That's for sure. But if we
look at the details, if the people
who really know what's going on
look at the detail, we look at the
real issues, we have the trade
deficit, sure, but most people in the
U.S recognize that it's a simplistic
number.

DEVELOPING STORY

JACK MA: TRADE WAR COULD LAST 20 YEARS [ett ie

Robert Lawrence Kuhn = Author, ""How China's Leaders Think"" i a

a= = a

@questCNN

6

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026873
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025933.txt,">>
“pis.

SD

>> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
>> http://www.avast.com/

>>

“pis.

SD

Sis

bs

>

Philip Kafka

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025933
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021181.txt,"When I was noticed watching them, about fifteen of them came up to me
and began to beg for money and food. | was over taken by the poor,
hungry children and I felt sad for them all and wished I could help out
somehow. When the tide of kids washed away and the street went empty,
I was overcome with intrigue at these two little boys. Brothers I found out
later on, and there only toy was an empty can they were kicking to each
other in the middle of the street. Intelligent kids, they were able to speak
three different languages, including English and I was interested to ask
them about life here. They didn’t seem to notice or be bothered by their
poverty stricken lives. They told me about their school and parents and I
thought | had just heard the saddest story ever but they were accustomed
to living like that like I had been so accustomed to my degrading lifestyle
for so long.

1] was compelled to empty out the contents of my purse, giving them
over two thousand dollars in U.S currency. A passer-byer snapped a
photo of the kids and me for myself to take home as a personal souvenir
before they rushed home to proudly show there parents the money. I told
Jeffrey later on of my good deed and he couldn’t believe I’d give away
my money so carelessly. He told me | had set up their parents with
enough money to feed and shelter their family for a year. Wasn’t that a
good thing? I couldn’t believe it, not that | was well off or anything close
too it, but to realize how lucky I was and to not have compassion for the
lesser off, especially children of a third- world country, I wouldn’t be
human anymore. Then again what did I expect from someone who could
numerously steal another man’s daughter for the use of his own sexual
pleasure with great ease.

We went out to lunch the following day with Jeffrey’s team of
designers to wrap things up and after Jeffrey’s afternoon massage he went
to the palace to have a nap. When | was all alone I thought I’d go see the
culture of the local unique markets again and this time buy some trinkets
to bring home. I got to sightseeing and took pictures of the legs of lamb
hung over the blood drenched doorway over people’s homes as to warn
off evil spirits and the ghettos where the local villager’s called home. I
walked into many of the market’s stalls and saw the most peculiar
antiques, such as weaponry with the blood of it’s last victim stained on
it’s sharp blades and body pieces of various animal’s for the use of
religious sacrifices. I was more interested in the different culture and
respecting their ancient way of life with interest, instead of squirming like
a tourist and getting grossed out. I thought it was so educational and
enthralling in fact, [ ended up buying a few sacrificial trinkets to have
sent to my apartment in Palm Beach. Not to say that I wasn’t looking
forward to getting back to the luxuries of western civilization it was a bit
like camping, fun and adventurous but as equally dangerous and thrilling.

73

©] Copyright Protected Material
CONFIDENTIAL GIUFFRE004206

When we left for the final destination of our trip | was looking forward to
eating normal food again, not one to stray for foreign dishes, I’m a more
of a cheeseburger and pizza kind of girl, a true sign of my American
heritage.

We landed at the Heathrow Int’l Airport and greeted by a driver that
would take us to Ghislane’s town house in London’s central that Jeffrey
had recently bought and refurbished as a gift for her. Emmy said “Good-
Bye” at the airport, leaving us to go to her hometown in the rural
countryside nearby to visit family for a six-week holiday from work. It
wasn’t a very long drive before we were in the heart of the city and at
Ghislane’s place. I thought it was a cheery townhouse that had character
and the historical pub in front of it and cobblestone streets only added a
unique charm to its presence. They were going out for dinner and invited
me along with them but seeing | was so exhausted from all the travelling
and looking a bit melancholy, I apologetically declined going out for
dinner that evening, I rather would be taking a few pills to catch up on
some needed sleep. “Are you sure your Okay”? Ghislane asked as she
showed me to my room, more considerate than she normally was but |
assured her that | was in absolute good health, just tired from all of the
recent jet lag. Without another word said she whisked off downstairs, to
the car where Jeffrey was waiting for her.

I took the liberty to call my parents house to say “Hello” and catch up
with them since I hadn’t been home at all for the holiday season this year,
always too busy working. They sounded really happy to hear from me
and my mom put me on the phone to talk to my brothers as well. | got to
tell them about my travels abroad and I had some cool tribal stuff from
Africa that I bought for them. They sounded so proud of me, all of them,
and why shouldn’t they be? In everyone’s convinced mind I was making
great money, travelling the world, and meeting new faces everywhere |
went, why should I spoil anyone’s delusions, especially mine. | took my
sleeping tablets and had a bath before falling into a deep and much
needed sleep.

The next morning I was woken up by Ghislane who | could tell was in a
chirpy mood by the way she paraded through my closed door saying
“Wake-up sleepy head” and opened the window’s shutters to let in the
bright sunlight, she had never done anything like this before and I knew
immediately something big was happening. She sat down on my bed as I
rolled over from my deep slumber and | was able to mutter for an
explanation as to why she was awake so early. “Besides the fact it is ten
o’clock in the morning and nearly time for brunch, we have a big day
planned out for you today.” She was waiting for my cue to ask her “What
are we doing”, when I did, she responded with a convincing enthusiasm
“We're going shopping for a new ensemble” she paused for a moment to

74

O Copyright Protected Material

GIUFFRE004207

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021181
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032862.txt,"surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle
will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've
encountered before.

Meanwhile--

In a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how
a press campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media
controversy than they are of legal threats):

1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not
publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the
questionable nature of the book;

2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson.
Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity
Fair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine;

3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the
book, and that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe
Patterson's ""authorship"" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an
extension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--
effectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues.

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032862
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020027.txt,"By the afternoon, the national security team was experiencing a sense of rising panic:
the president, in their view, didn’t seem to be quite registering the situation. Bannon
wasn’t helping. His hyperrationalist approach obviously appealed to the not-always-
rational president. A chemical attack didn’t change the circumstances on the ground,
Bannon argued; besides, there had been far worse attacks with far more casualties than
this one. If you were looking for broken children, you could find them anywhere. Why
these broken children?

The president was not a debater—well, not in any Socratic sense. Nor was he in any
conventional sense a decision maker. And certainly he was not a student of foreign policy
views and options. But this was nevertheless turning into a genuine philosophical face-off.

“Do nothing” had long been viewed as an unacceptable position of helplessness by
American foreign policy experts. The instinct to do something was driven by the desire to
prove you were not limited to nothing. You couldn’t do nothing and show strength. But
Bannon’s approach was very much “A pox on all your houses,” it was not our mess, and
judging by all recent evidence, no good would come of trying to help clean it up. That
effort would cost military lives with no military reward. Bannon, believing in the need for
a radical shift in foreign policy, was proposing a new doctrine: Fuck ’em. This iron-fisted
isolationism appealed to the president’s transactional self: What was in it for us (or for
him)?

Hence the urgency to get Bannon off the National Security Council. The curious thing
is that in the beginning he was thought to be much more reasonable than Michael Flynn,
with his fixation on Iran as the source of all evil. Bannon was supposed to babysit Flynn.
But Bannon, quite to Kushner’s shock, had not just an isolationist worldview but an
apocalyptic one. Much of the world would burn and there was nothing you could do about
it.

The announcement of Bannon’s removal was made the day after the attack. That in
itself was a rather remarkable accomplishment on the part of the moderates. In little more
than two months, Trump’s radical, if not screwball, national security leadership had been
replaced by so-called reasonable people.

The job was now to bring the president into this circle of reason.

OOK Ok

As the day wore on, both Ivanka Trump and Dina Powell were united in their
determination to persuade the president to react ... normally. At the very minimum, an
absolute condemnation of the use of chemical weapons, a set of sanctions, and, ideally, a
military response—although not a big one. None of this was in any way exceptional.
Which was sort of the point: it was critical not to respond in a radical, destabilizing way—
including a radical nonresponse.

Kushner was by now complaining to his wife that her father just didn’t get it. It had

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020027
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011244.txt,"Seren_Dipit | #Noticias Inmigrante china a favor del Brexit porque 23 Jun 2016, | Caracas. 0 | neutral
y37 su “empleado espaAtol siempre estAi dormido"" 16:04 - CEST | -
https://t.co/oJPuauc9FG #DeTod
oUnPoc
fe)
johnny_mac | thinking about my friends who voted in todaya€™s 23 Jun 2016, | San 0 | positive
#brexit vote 16:04 - CEST | Francisc
o, CA
jeremynwal | RT @JetSetterRyan: 80% of Americans think the U.K. 23 Jun 2016, 51 | positive
ker should leave the EU. They're right. #Brexit 16:04 - CEST
#ChooseWisely https://t.co/zpHfBOqXFm
bolsamania_ | RT @LunaJoseM: 10 fondos de inversiA?n para ganar 23 Jun 2016, | Madrid 2 | neutral
dinero con el referA@ndum en Reino Unido, haya o 16:04 - CEST
no Brexit https://t.co/MjShtxKJEi vAa @Bola€!
JF_Luc RT @G_Dussausaye: Ma rA@ponse A @VOANews: 23 Jun 2016, | Marseill 2 | negative
a€celt will give the British freedom, and it will show 16:04-CEST |e
we can renegotiate EU treaties"". #Brexit
httpa€ |
giod_arco RT @CafeGeopolitico: #Brexit: per I'#ltalia A” meglio il | 23 Jun 2016, 5 | positive
#RegnoUnito rimanga o esca dall'#UE? Diteci la vostra | 16:04 - CEST
lambo_unch | I'm weirdly excited about the #Brexit vote today? 23 Jun 2016, 0 | positive
ained 16:04 - CEST
EganRichard | Brits in Germany left ‘fuming’ by Brexit polling card 23 Jun 2016, | Helsinki, 0 | negative
son fiasco https://t.co/YbOGDnA7ev via 16:04 - CEST | Finland
@TheLocalGermany
Horonzoud RT @volkskrant: Erdogan overweegt A?A?k een 23 Jun 2016, 4 | negative
referendum over de EU te houden #liveblog #brexit 16:21 - CEST
https://t.co/WKup37LIvD https://t.co/ySF7wHxmhg
internettub | RT @golub: 'Brexit' to be followed by Grexit. 23 Jun 2016, | Cardiff 1911 | positive
es Departugal. Italeave. Fruckoff. Czechout. Oustria. 16:21 - CEST
Finish. Slovakout. Latervia. Byegium.
machineO1_ | RT @Snowden: No matter the outcome, #Brexit polls 23 Jun 2016, 665 | neutral
jag demonstrate how quickly half of any population can 16:21 - CEST
be convinced to vote against itself. Qa€ |
mwengway | @ReDefineEurope @EUWatchers @ShareThis Bullshit | 23 Jun 2016, 0) NA
! #Brexit 16:21 - CEST
gcprimecam | Devemos ficar atentos paraa pequena, mas possAvel | 23 Jun 2016, | Porto 0 | neutral
bio hipA?tese de ""Brexit"" (saAda do Reuni Unido da 16:21-CEST | Alegre
UniA£o EuropA@ia) amanhAge. (continua)
creativityvta | RT @philstockworld: O Brexit Day! Callooh! Callay! 23 Jun 2016, | Michiga 246 | positive
lu SSCHN SSPY SCLF #Futures https://t.co/NfYWt2NpsJ 16:21-CEST | n
https://t.co/je0ef2 LawL
YevetteBerg | RT @Snowden: No matter the outcome, #Brexit polls 23 Jun 2016, | Silicon 665 | neutral
qui2 demonstrate how quickly half of any population can 16:21 -CEST | Valley
be convinced to vote against itself. Qa€ |
pcoss Brexit Explained 23 Jun 2016, | 4% Tiel 0 | negative
https://t.co/DgOcHWSjkK 16:21-CEST | fitlel%
fetui tte
%

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011244
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013833.txt,"Professor Ed Zschau’s “High-Tech Entrepreneurship” class. Ferriss challenged Marrinan and his fellow
seniors to contact high-profile celebrities and CEOs and get their answers to questions they have always
wanted to ask.

For extra incentive, Ferriss promised the student who could contact the most hard-to-reach name and
ask the most intriguing question a round-trip plane ticket anywhere in the world.

“I believe that success can be measured in the number of uncomfortable conversations you’re willing
to have. I felt that if I could help students overcome the fear of rejection with cold-calling and cold e-
mail, it would serve them forever,” Ferriss said. “It’s easy to sell yourself short, but when you see
classmates getting responses from people like [former president] George Bush, the CEOs of Disney,
Comcast, Google, and HP, and dozens of other impossible-to-reach people, it forces you to reconsider
your self-set limitations.” ... Ferriss lectures to the students of “High-Tech Entrepreneurship” each
semester about creating a startup and designing the ideal lifestyle.

“I participate in this contest every day,” said Ferriss. “I do what I always do: find a personal e-mail if
possible, often through their little-known personal blogs, send a two- to three-paragraph e-mail which
explains that I am familiar with their work, and ask one simple-to-answer but thought-provoking
question in that e-mail related to their work or life philosophies. The goal is to start a dialogue so they
take the time to answer future e-mails—not to ask for help. That can only come after at least three or
four genuine e-mail exchanges.”

With “textbook execution of the Tim Ferriss Technique,” as he put it, Marrinan was able to strike up a
bond with Komisar. In his initial e-mail, he talked about reading one of Komisar’s Harvard Business
Review articles and feeling inspired to ask him, “When were you happiest in your life?” After Komisar
replied with references to Tibetan Buddhism, Marrinan responded, “Just as words are inadequate to
explain true happiness, so too are words inadequate to express my thanks.” His e-mail included his
personal translation of a French poem by Taisen Deshimaru, the former European head of Soto Zen. An
e-mail relationship was formed, and Komisar even e-mailed Marrinan a few days later with a link to a
New York Times article on happiness.

Contacting Schmidt proved more challenging. For Marrinan, the toughest part was getting Schmidt’s
personal e-mail address. He e-mailed a Princeton dean asking for it. No response. Two weeks later, he e-
mailed the same dean again, defending his request by reminding her that he had previously met Schmidt.
The dean said no, but Marrinan refused to give up. He e-mailed her a third time. “Have you ever made
an exception?” he asked. The dean finally gave in, he said, and provided him with Schmidt’s e-mail.

“I know some of my classmates pursued the alternative scattershot technique with some success, but
that’s not my bag,” Marrinan said, explaining his perseverance. “I deal with rejection by persisting, not
by taking my business elsewhere. My maxim comes from Samuel Beckett, a personal hero of mine:
‘Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.’ You won’t believe what you can
accomplish by attempting the impossible with the courage to repeatedly fail better.”

Nathan Kaplan, another participant in the contest, was most proud of the way that he was able to
contact former Newark mayor Sharpe James. Because James had made a campaign contribution to Al
Sharpton, the website www.fundrace.org listed James’s home address. Kaplan then input James’s address
into an online serach-by-address phone directory, through which he received the former mayor’s phone
number. Kaplan left a message for James, and a few days later finally got to ask him about childhood
education.

Ferriss is proud of the effort students have put into his contest. “Most people can do absolutely awe-
inspiring things,” he said. “Sometimes they just need a little nudge.”

=» Q&A: QUESTIONS AND ACTIONS

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013833
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014184.txt,"SiS FPS EO
Pid Ste tee LLO

eosaouel
ssouoieg ‘UUEUTISYL

{189 Opsenpy Za9SEL0RLPr
rag
4 yaks suecy ta
asnoy pNog jeAoy - 15 12} SWH
wos YUIMIUEOpoay op
~LENp@ ‘et
(d)z92996 OBZ PyL
SPaog “it
18910.4 BY8""]
BeOd SiapuNnes “US 001
IPG IeWIpUe] vy
‘A'N 19219 HNO
opie

npy ‘Hqqes-}uesopos |

SSOE eZ Z1Z O10
Auepy ‘unequavua,

tte

(uy) Ze08 SOS Ze

aiqevod sine 6S91 689 216
xey seine 275 SOS stg
sane queysissy 2SpL SOS Zhe
ayqeyiod joula 29b0 B68 116
vzS0t TN ‘uOsIU +]

peoy janopay yon g¢(tuH
yauyUUPeaMauyoy yews
xegad 1058-05-24
aIBAL G2ab GLb Che
£0004 AN 30, MeN

soni: 001# Aempeog p28
Dpeny Rysnyeses F IU, YO?

JOHNS PF ONG JOWARL

xez 9189°SP2-2020
ZLeP SEZ

(uy) SeBE-OS2-216
POLY 9P8 216 100
LAS Yopuo?)

1S UTE ISAM GL

uepseqes ‘sojAe |

a Boor 128 eb2 LOO

epoue ‘10jAeL

ao 66220
aloud! Nd eee a3 rit

(a) 2699 S58 18

uyor 2epS/2 180 EB 2Oe
jew 89104 2200-29 216 100
(mw) 0092 ye 2be [00

S900 11S 242 500

WOLH enuaAy Ed 782
Boye ‘opAeL

AiUQ ""ON
won 7 RF Sf 298 E88
$9006 VO Bom AON ISBAA

aay jaune)» iofuel

JOU YeOgAelus jews

cd pee eT

(818 esne7)ec9 60S 9561 fi]
(ul Lelecs-coe) git

Aug ‘sayAey

M) 1226 BEb-20Z0
3 $20 p82-2020

TMN Uopudy
Peoy Haq 89ube /

49}8d ‘sealejnoae

*  (M) £216 BE -20Z0
ehis

UOpUuo
WON stony Kouunas
BSaJaLOS

yi
9 Ana AW weesuhaneh

OO20-ZE9-1 5:
(ELE

yL0, Pre
anuaay Wig ZL - Z{u

(nd EBEs-Gee-OL8

poeey ueGiyoiyy ‘suit Prayulionig
aye] HUG] yse3 002

pay y ‘uew|qnes,

ey)
SONAL

Pad
om

£6¢ 082-2060
1. uapud
Whe yuomul g

pedny ‘aye

ia epee 8z2-2020

3

Oy
POOOSMD

XE GI!
vanes Baie

di
BoIAJes swage i eB 8
(6) 89

Ip;

COIN

MOO
Soseces:

uoy Bud:
Wed ienois

oo-enresnd paeehie, oH
ewig

58

GIUFFRE00 1634

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014184
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032272.txt,"From: Miller, Micha 
Sent: 7/7/2016 1:04:06 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]; Darren Indyke 
Subject: 
RE: 
Importance: High 
Thank you, Jeffrey. Mike 
Michael C. Miller 
Partner 
www.steptoe.com/mmiller 
Steptoe 
Kathy Ruemmler 
+1 	direct 	Steptoe & Johnson LLP 
+1 	fax 	1114 Avenue of the Americas 
+1___________________ 	cell 	New York, NY 10036 www.steptoe.com  
This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. 
From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 8:12 AM 
To: Darren Indyke; Kathy Ruemmler; Miller, Michael 
Subject: 
https ://www.the guardian. com/us-news/20 1 6/jul/07/donald-trump-s exual-ass ault-lawsuits-norm-lub ow 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032272 
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032402.txt,"please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032402
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020033.txt,"The central problem was that the president was neither inclined to make fun of himself,
nor particularly funny himself—at least not, in Conway’s description, “in that kind of
humorous way.”

George W. Bush had famously resisted the Correspondents’ Dinner and suffered
greatly at it, but he had prepped extensively, and every year he pulled out an acceptable
performance. But neither woman, confiding their concerns around the small table in
Conway’s office to a journalist they regarded as sympathetic, thought Trump had a
realistic chance of making the dinner anything like a success.

“He doesn’t appreciate cruel humor,” said Conway.
“His style is more old-fashioned,” said Hicks.

Both women, clearly seeing the Correspondents’ Dinner as an intractable problem, kept
characterizing the event as “unfair,” which, more generally, is how they characterized the
media’s view of Trump. “He’s unfairly portrayed.” “They don’t give him the benefit of the
doubt.” “He’s just not treated the way other presidents have been treated.”

The burden here for Conway and Hicks was their understanding that the president did
not see the media’s lack of regard for him as part of a political divide on which he stood
on a particular side. Instead, he perceived it as a deep personal attack on him: for entirely
unfair reasons, ad hominem reasons, the media just did not like him. Ridiculed him.
Cruelly. Why?

The journalist, trying to offer some comfort, told the two women there was a rumor
going around that Graydon Carter—the editor of Vanity Fair and host of one of the most
important parties of the Correspondents’ Dinner weekend, and, for decades, one of
Trump’s key tormentors in the media—was shortly going to be pushed out of the
magazine.

“Really?” said Hicks, jumping up. “Oh my God, can I tell him? Would that be okay?
He’ll want to know this.” She headed quickly downstairs to the Oval Office.

OOK Ok

Curiously, Conway and Hicks each portrayed a side of the president’s alter ego media
problem. Conway was the bitter antagonist, the mud-in-your-eye messenger who reliably
sent the media into paroxysms of outrage against the president. Hicks was the confidante
ever trying to get the president a break and some good ink in the only media he really
cared about—the media that most hated him. But as different as they were in their media
functions and temperament, both women had achieved remarkable influence in the
administration by serving as the key lieutenants responsible for addressing the president’s
most pressing concern, his media reputation.

While Trump was in most ways a conventional misogynist, in the workplace he was
much closer to women than to men. The former he confided in, the latter he held at arm’s

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020033
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011250.txt,"Danaperson | Svenska partiledarnas stora oro fA{r en brexit 23 Jun 2016, | GAflteb negative
a https://t.co/ACKcSL5GI7 17:29 -CEST | org,
Tummarna fA{[r England, [Aumna dA¥rskapen. Sverige
mrtriple5S RT @DonaldClarke63: It's #pencilgate. #Brexit 23 Jun 2016, neutral
nutcases suggesting pencils, rather than pens, have 17:29 - CEST
been provided to facilitate fraud. https:a€ |
Insure_My_ | #UKexpats in Spain watching Brexit vote anxiously 23 Jun 2016, | UK neutral
Villa https://t.co/Qdlp2XdMNW #Spain 17:29 - CEST
https://t.co/F5ild6amUr
KeevoBrow | European family in park. Mum says to kids ""come on, 23 Jun 2016, | Whitley. neutral
n82 its time to go home"" 17:29 - CEST | Coventr
Come tomorrow morning it may be truer than you y. U.K.
suggested #brexit
pialikespizza | RT @AlisonNotaBird: the real stake of #brexit is if 23 Jun 2016, | THE neutral
@pialikespizza keeps or loses her status of having the | 17:29-CEST | MOMEN
two most powerful passports in ta€ | T
fsclaire_ Whit does ""brexit"" mean?? makes me think of 23 Jun 2016, | scotland positive
breakfast 17:29-CEST |.
eleanorpd RT @sophie_sparkes: Last night, Remain tweets finally | 23 Jun 2016, | Mercer negative
outstripped Leave tweets. Wonder if this is indicative 17:29 - CEST | Island,
of how #brexit will go? https:a€ | WA
TheGregJon | People of Britain: how about celebrating with a 23 Jun 2016, | London negative
es continental breakfast for #Bremain and aconsolatory | 17:29 - CEST
full English if it's #Brexit?? #EUref
SPIEGEL_Pol | RT @Augstein: Um die Rechten zu stoppen muss 23 Jun 2016, | Hambur neutral
itik Europa stAxrker UND sozialer werden 17:29 -CEST | gund
https://t.co/4KnK3Nur5J Berlin
condorbox RT @gzibordi: la cosa patetica A” che sia il Blog di 23 Jun 2016, | 43.5224 negative
Grillo&DeMaio che la Meloni non appoggiano la Brexit | 17:46- CEST | 7,13.23
perchA” hanno la sensazione che pera€ ! 519
Mickierod @realdealdanny seriously make sure you use a pen. | 23 Jun 2016, | Here, negative
am NOT joking. Brexit 17:46 - CEST | there
and
back
again
Hansalyse Sidder pA¥ en strand i Israel. Hvor kan jeg finde en 23 Jun 2016, | a°Zi,e negative
brexit exitpoll? 17:46 -CEST | 285432
46
NewstalkFM | #Brexit: The highs and lows of the referendum 23 Jun 2016, | Ireland negative
campaign so far: https://t.co/83IFANn5v2 17:46 - CEST
https://t.co/zmacFkIGWc
KebiegoNixo | RT @citizentvkenya: BREXIT: What the consequential 23 Jun 2016, | kitale neutral
n vote means https://t.co/xHxzl8W1SF 17:46 - CEST
https://t.co/T2VGJaCTcO
wistcom Wall Street Climbs as Brexit Vote Eyed Fox Business 23 Jun 2016, | digital neutral
#Brexit https://t.co/S6DviHMrfm 17:46 - CEST
https://t.co/L5lO3Wyurk https://t.co/UBVKdi2oWI
facilitatore The latest The facilitatore Daily! 23 Jun 2016, | Ti positive
https://t.co/ZHox0g2dZ4 Thanks to @gmboccanera 17:46 - CEST | risolvo
@perugini #brexit #m5s problem

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011250
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013827.txt,"the peak of hyperinflation, and just in time for the worst drought in a decade. For these same reasons,
some people would consider his timing quite poor from a more selfish survival standpoint.

He had also missed the memo. The national menu had changed, and they were out of luxuries like
bread and clean water. He would be surviving for four months on a slushlike concoction of corn meal
and spinach. Not what most of us would order at the movie theater.

“WOW,I CAN SURVIVE.”

J ean-Marc had passed the point of no return, but it didn’t matter. After two weeks of adjusting to the

breakfast, lunch, and dinner (Mush a la Ghana), he had no desire to escape. The most basic of foods and
good friends proved to be the only real necessities, and what would seem like a disaster from the outside
was the most life-affirming epiphany he’d ever experienced: The worst really wasn’t that bad. To enjoy
life, you don’t need fancy nonsense, but you do need to control your time and realize that most things
just aren’t as serious as you make them out to be.

Now 48, Jean-Marc lives in a nice home in Ontario, but could live without it. He has cash, but could
fall into poverty tomorrow and it wouldn’t matter. Some of his fondest memories still include nothing
but friends and gruel. He is dedicated to creating special moments for himself and his family and is
utterly unconcerned with retirement. He’s already lived 20 years of partial retirement in perfect health.

Don’t save it all for the end. There is every reason not to.

=» Q&A: QUESTIONS AND ACTIONS

I am an old man and have known a great many troubles, but most of them never happened.
— MARK TWAIN

L, you are nervous about making the jump or simply putting it off out of fear of the unknown, here is

your antidote. Write down your answers, and keep in mind that thinking a lot will not prove as fruitful or
as prolific as simply brain vomiting on the page. Write and do not edit—aim for volume. Spend a few
minutes on each answer.

1. Define your nightmare, the absolute worst that could happen if you did what you are
considering. What doubt, fears, and “what-ifs” pop up as you consider the big changes you can—
or need—to make? Envision them in painstaking detail. Would it be the end of your life? What
would be the permanent impact, if any, on a scale of 1-10? Are these things really permanent?
How likely do you think it is that they would actually happen?

2. What steps could you take to repair the damage or get things back on the upswing, even if
temporarily? Chances are, it’s easier than you imagine. How could you get things back under
control?

3. What are the outcomes or benefits, both temporary and permanent, of more probable

scenarios? Now that you’ve defined the nightmare, what are the more probable or definite positive
outcomes, whether internal (confidence, self-esteem, etc.) or external? What would the impact of
these more-likely outcomes be ona scale of 1-10? How likely is it that you could produce at least
a moderately good outcome? Have less intelligent people done this before and pulled it off?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013827
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033178.txt,"From: 
Sent: 10/19/2016 6:25:58 PM 
To: jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: News 
Importance: High 
Hi Jeffrey ! ! 
Thank you for writing. I'm doing well. Looking forward for winter season in the Alps! 
I have from Zurich as assistant for you. I sent you her photos once :) lives in New Jersey 
now and in Paris!! 
I have some new ones here in zurich but not in NY or Paris yet. 
How is it going with Zubair? 
Do you believe Trump will win or Hilary ? 
I miss Berkeley so much. This California lifestyle was magical. Can't wait to be back for 2nd semester C) 
I plan to pass NY or California bar and be attorney in USA. I love America and the win mentality in your 
country. 
Kind regards, 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033178 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014190.txt,"woo AUpIG)NOIs yews
(hipe7 66 C188
ZSh10

CN 90x U8IS)

“pay adel YyInes CLP

oss ‘Wayed

{i
WES S16 605
$Z001 AN HOA MeN

yaaHg UI9g SBA LOE
30079 aif}
uedy ‘auuo0jd

IOA
NS WEL SER OS
VoL ev

eupnag ‘eUyxNtZ

nee ee

uyor ‘22187

woo ‘usisepyez7@yozu (yews
Loz x 0602 OBS Zbe

WeW HeZ

()SaPreces S9 99 0

(mlagyeee? So DOLWH
woo sHOsaleyeLIOsieyem!

(u)spzopara $9 00

(Ujebz5bb509 SO OG

yweisissy @ANIeX
(ssaeM Bunt

ueupy pue (gig 484987

Eby yeosny

‘629 XOQ 'O'd UELUQ {0 STEURIN
ms pun opus
4 $819 UOWM OC

paajepg ‘|ANeMez

HL8L8 OO Ue
peay sy27 fe18AI9 BL yt
qog 2 abieg oynbuez

ZLBE S26 046 ago

oI
sonia ie

uopiod syoe7

S202 169 afe BE
0926 o6 pats

ap efies ‘ejaejsoGhy

fewasion 696 pL
om ete)

MOS{APY juUOpEUaU SsV2ay

* JO [oud
aSULid tayhejsol We

ny

a SORE
Lywid Baepsobnk

(rete eae
‘ al
ae] 9 Agel ‘soBunon

Aqoj Buno,

‘c}
(mJG/22 BE6-20
0602 epi-80%0

(ABBjd) mespuy saye,

woa'sainjueAsGiauds@aued
Supp alt £18
SPL60E 86 G8 00

noyuBbz aye,

4
z
;
z

64

GIUFFRE0016

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014190
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029319.txt,"Thursday, September 12, 2013
Page 5

investors.” Edwards could not have possibly “pumped” the cases to investors when he
never participated in any communication with investors. However, Epstein’s
“pumping” claims fail for an even more basic reason: Edwards was entitled — indeed
ethically obligated as an attorney — to secure the maximum recovery for his clients
during the course of his legal representation. As is well known, “[a]s an advocate, a
lawyer zealously asserts the client’s position under the rules of the adversary system.”
Fla. Rules of Prof. Conduct, Preamble. Edwards therefore was required to pursue
(unless otherwise instructed by his clients) a maximum recovery against Epstein.
Edwards, therefore, could never be liable for doing something that his ethical duties as
an attorney required. In a further effort to harass Edwards, Epstein also filed a bar
complaint with the Florida Bar against Edwards. The Florida Bar dismissed the
complaint.

Another reason that Epstein’s claims that Edwards was “pumping” cases for investors
fails is that Edwards filed all three cases almost a year before he was hired by RRA or
even knew of Scott Rothstein. Epstein makes allegations that the complaints
contained sensational allegations for the purposes of luring investors; however,
language in the complaints remained virtually unchanged from the first filing in 2008
and overwhelming evidence supports the conclusion that all of the facts alleged by
Edwards in the complaints were true.

Epstein ultimately paid to settle all three of the cases Edwards filed against him for
more money than he paid to settle any of the other claims against him. At Epstein’s
request, the terms of the settlement were kept confidential. Epstein chose to make this
payment as the result of a federal court ordered mediation process, which he himself
sought (over the objection of Jane Doe, Edwards’ client in federal court) in an effort to
resolve the case. Notably, Epstein sought this settlement conference — and ultimately
made his payments as a result of that conference - in July 2010, more than seven
months after he filed this lawsuit against Edwards. Accordingly, Epstein could not
have been the victim of any scheme to “pump” the cases against him, because he
never paid to settle the cases until well after Edwards had left RRA, after Edwards had
severed all connection with Scott Rothstein (December 2009), and well after the
details of Rothstein’s Ponzi scheme had been widely publicized.

In addition, if Epstein had thought that there was some improper coercion involved in,
for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal
District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from
raising any such claim, Epstein simply chose to settle that case. He was therefore
barred by the doctrine of res judicata from somehow re-litigating what happened in
(for example) the Jane Doe case. The doctrine of res judicata makes a judgment on
the merits conclusive ‘not only as to every matter which was offered and received to
sustain or defeat the claim, but as to every other matter which might with propriety

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029319
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029398.txt,"﻿New Firepower in Shocking Suit Against Trump | Law.com
http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/10/10/new-firepower-in-shocking-suit-against-tr...
Page 1 of 3
10/11/2016
NOT FOR REPRINT
Click to Print or Select 'Print' in your browser menu to print this document.
Page printed from: /sites/almstaff/2016/10/10/new-firepower-in-shocking-suit-against-trump/
New Firepower in Shocking Suit Against
Trump
By Jenna Greene
Published: Oct 10, 2016
Donald Trump, left, and J. Cheney Mason, right.
Photos: lev radin/Shutterstock.com and Rick Runion/AP
If you thought the presidential election couldn’t get any uglier, guess again. Because a suit against
Donald Trump alleging that he raped a 13-year-old girl has new life.
On Monday, Florida criminal defense lawyer J. Cheney Mason—best known for successfully
defending Casey Anthony, who was charged with killing her 2-year-old daughter—filed court papers
to represent “Jane Doe” in a suit against Trump and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
New Firepower in Shocking Suit Against Trump | Law.com
http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/10/10/new-firepower-in-shocking-suit-against-tr...
Page 2 of 3
10/11/2016
The rape suit isn’t exactly new. It was filed pro se by “Katie Johnson” in Los Angeles federal court in
April, dismissed, refiled in the Southern District of New York, withdrawn and refiled on Sept. 30. But
with the addition of Mason—a media-savvy lawyer not known for shying away from the
spotlight—the stakes have changed.
Suddenly, it’s a lot more serious. Which is not the same as legitimate, but
the odds that the case will go away quietly are much slimmer given the
firepower of her new counsel. Especially now, in the wake of a 2005
recording where Trump bragged about using his star power to kiss and
grope women.
The allegations in the suit are truly awful. Jane Doe says that when she was
13, she attended parties at Epstein’s New York City townhouse, enticed by
promises of money and a modeling career. She allegedly had sexual
encounters with Trump on four occasions there.
The complaint states, “Defendant Trump tied plaintiff to a bed, exposed
himself to plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no
effect. Defendant Trump responded to plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking plaintiff in the face with
his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted.”
Epstein allegedly raped her as well. In 2008, he pleaded guilty to soliciting an underage girl for
prostitution, and has faced other suits by women who allege underage sexual assault.
Trump’s lawyer Alan Garten, has unequivocally denied the allegations. In fact, the current complaint
quotes his denial: “The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level
and clearly framed to solicit media attention or, perhaps, are simply politically motivated. There is
absolutely no merit to these allegations. Period.” Doe’s suit claims that this statement is libelous.
The only reason I can think of for including such a seemingly absurd claim (how can you libel
someone who is anonymous?) is that it’s not time-barred. The rest of the complaint probably is.
The alleged incidents took place in 1994—22 years ago. The complaint claims that Doe didn’t come
forward because she was “unrelentingly threatened by each defendant that, were she ever to reveal
any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse caused to her by defendants, plaintiff and her
family would be physically harmed if not killed.”
But Epstein in 2008 was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Why couldn’t she have come forward
then?
That’s not the only problem with the case.
I wrote about the suit when it was first filed in LA with great skepticism—“an anonymous stink
bomb,” I called it.
In large part, I was dubious because the person filing the complaint, “Katie Johnson,” claimed her
only past work experience was as a freelance model. And yet her pro se complaint was perfectly
formatted, with proper margins and numbering; it correctly cited statutes, got the venue and
jurisdiction correct and contained no typos.
New Firepower in Shocking Suit Against Trump | Law.com
http://www.law.com/sites/almstaff/2016/10/10/new-firepower-in-shocking-suit-against-tr...
Page 3 of 3
10/11/2016
It looked more to me like the secret handiwork of a lawyer intent on smearing Trump.
If so, however, there was no way to hold anyone accountable. The phone number provided was
disconnected and Johnson’s address was an abandoned, foreclosed house.
The allegations in the latest complaint by “Jane Doe” are the same, albeit with fewer lurid details and
no explanation why she is no longer Katie Johnson. But the biggest difference is that she’s got
lawyers now.
In addition to Mason, “Jane Doe” is represented—improbably—by New Jersey patent litigator
Thomas Meagher, the managing partner of nine-lawyer IP boutique Meagher Emanuel Laks Goldberg
& Liao.
Mason and Meagher did not respond to requests for comment.
Campaign finance records show that Mason gave $2,000 to Hillary Clinton in February. Meagher
during this election cycle has donated to Marco Rubio, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush. He has
never given money to a Democrat, according to Open Secrets data.
So is the suit for real? Or is it an especially dirty way to attack Donald Trump?
There’s a You Tube video of the plaintiff, with her faced blurred and her voice distorted, where she
recounts the rape. Under these conditions, it’s impossible to tell if she’s credible or not.
The complaint also includes an affidavit from “Joan Doe,” a school friend who said the plaintiff told
her about the rapes in 1994, and from “Tiffany Doe,” who said she recruited the plaintiff to come to
Epstein’s parties and witnessed the sexual assaults. So perhaps more evidence will emerge to bolster
Jane Doe’s claims.
On the other hand, if the complaint is determined to be without merit, Mason and Meagher could be
sanctioned by the court for filing a frivolous lawsuit.
Or Trump could respond like Alan Dershowitz, who was also accused of sexual misconduct with a
minor in connection with Epstein. The Harvard Law School professor said lawyers for the accuser
acted unethically and fabricated the allegations; in turn, they sued him for defamation. The case
settled earlier this year on undisclosed terms.
In the Trump case, U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams set an initial conference for Dec. 16. The real
question: if Clinton wins, will this case simply disappear?
Jenna Greene can be reached at jgreene@alm.com. On Twitter: @JgreeneJenna
© Copyright 2016. ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved.
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032416.txt,"constitute inside information, and is intended only for

the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032416
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021195.txt,"Until finally he called my cell phone later in the afternoon, relief swept
over me when I heard his voice on the other end. “Thank God you called,
I have been so worried about you, are you alright?” I jumped in without
letting him get past saying “Hello”. “Yeah, I’m fine. Ritchie told me you
called his house looking for me yesterday and gave me shit for it saying
you were upset or something, what’s up?” I knew I would have to be
delicate about asking what happened to Adam, thinking he’d be a mess
over it. “T heard from Marcus that something happened to Adam and I got
worried about you, what is going on?” T.J sounded scared, for what
reasons were beyond my knowledge but I was going to find out, he
replied ‘1 don’t want to talk about it over the phone. Are you in town so
we can meet up or something?” It was obvious | wanted him to know that
I was more than willing to lend my shoulder for his problems. “I’m home
now if you want to come over whenever you feel like it.” He didn’t
hesitate in taking me up on the offer. ““ But 1 won’t be able to get there
until later, I’m downtown at Ritchie’s place unless you want to come pick
me up.”

It was more of a request than a favor to myself which is what he was
making it out to sound like, knowing him all to well 1 didn’t make a fuss
of his ill-contemplated attributes. I got the address off him and made my
way into the ugliness of the not so dazzling parts of the Palm Beaches
downtown area. Rolling up my windows and locking the doors to my
truck | nervously drove through the rough streets trying to find Ritchie’s
apartment complex. Knowing all too well the history of the area, it’s not a
place a lone white girl in a nice truck wants to be seen, many reports of
the locals rushing up to a vehicles with a weapon demanding money,
cars, Or just angry and out to hurt someone. I was speeding through the
streets wanting to get out of there as quick as | could. A sad world we live
in with so much hurt everywhere you look and nobody wanting to do
anything about it, just accepting the hopelessness of never being able to
achieve anything more than what our civilization has succumbed to.
Being among one of those people, we were similar in so many ways.
Only separated by our own personal fears and the different direction they
pulled us into.

I drove straight through the open gates at the entrance to the complex
and parked on the gutter in front of Ritchie’s block of units. A crowd of
people stood outside the blocks I was entering. Being hit on and offered
drugs simultaneously my cheeks went flush and I put my head down not
saying a word. Walking up the corridors of the staircase looked like a
scene out of a horror flick. Graffiti covered the peeling of green paint on
the walls and the pungent stench of something rotting, only to the worst
of my imagination, filled my nostrils. I could hear babies screaming

101

il Copyright Protected Material
CONFIDENTIAL GIUFFRE004234

through the thin walls and trying to find the unit number was difficult
from the sporadic flickering of the fluorescent lights above me.

At last I found Ritchie’s one, quite astonished with myself that I even
made it this far. I had to knock loudly on the door a few times before a
young girl answered the door with eyeliner bleeding down from her eyes,
her jet black hair was strung out and a mess and she looked off her face
on some hard drug. She had only her bra and a short skirt on to cover her
private areas and a cigarette hung out of her mouth to complete the full
picture of terrible state she was in. She looked me down with contempt
and snubbed at me “What do you want?” I maintained my politeness and
told her T.J was expecting me. She opened the door and walked away,
leaving me by myself to venture through looking for T.J.

Passing through the kitchen it looked like a hospital lab with syringes on
the counter tops and medicine containers lying around everywhere.
Minding my steps through the dirty house, I walked to the back to the
living room and found T.J in a K-Hole strung out on a filthy couch.
“Hey...there” he acknowledged me with a giant smile spread across his
face. He probably didn’t even know who | was from the dreadful state he
was in. My first look at him in months and I was in utter shock. My jaw
must have dropped to the floor at the very sight of him. Never seeing him
so skinny and unhealthy looking | took pity and wanted to help him
before things got even worse and he ended up like Adam, dead.

“T J, hey buddy its Jenna, remember | was coming to pick you up
today. You don’t look so good, what are you doing so messed up?” I
don’t think he could even understand what I was even saying because he
could only reply by giggling and rolling over, patting the couch as if it
were a fluffy animal. I stood over him now and raised my voice so he’d
know I was serious and snap out of it a bit. “Get Up T.J, Now!” I ushered
at him to get off the couch, repeating myself a few times over and with no
response | knew [ had to get physical. Rolling him back over to face me
again { smacked his face hard and I’m sure it stung but I got the reaction |
had wanted. He sat up and looked at me confused.

At least now he was able to focus on my words requesting him to come
with me. He was getting up from the couch and stumbling around before
falling down to the floor again. Putting his arm around my neck and
carrying the majority of his weight, I helped him up many times over and
down three flights of stairs into my truck and drove him back to my
place. It was a triumph on it’s own arriving downstairs in one piece.
Being the only person who really cared if T.J lived or died I felt like the
responsibility of helping him was my concern alone.

Thankfully Jeffrey was in Palm Beach for the next couple weeks
entertaining royalty, which gave me a little time to try and clean TJ up. I
called a few of his friends that I knew and asked them not to score any

102

Cd Copyright Protected Material

GIUYVFRE004235

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021195
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032876.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 6/22/2016 10:36:05 PM

To: ee

Subject: Re: Hi from London

no worry

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM i i wrote:
Hi Jeffrey!

I'm so sorry to hear about the Trump law suit. I wish there was something I could do. I always think of you.

All my love always,

Sent from my iPad

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032876
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025099.txt,"Although in the tourism sector there is an evident possibility of making money in Cuba,
it’s doubtful that the North American hotel industry, almost all present on the Stock
Exchange, subject to North American legislation and union pressure, would lend itself to
collaborating with the Cuban counter-intelligence by facilitating eavesdropping/wire-
tapping and clandestine filming inside hotel installations, such as today occurs in Melia
and other European chains, violating even Cuban law which supposedly defends the
inviolability of privacy. American lawyers are very clear about the high price German
companies had to pay when they associated themselves with Nazism, as occurred with
Volkswagen and Bayer.

Even though this is not a matter of investing in a country living under a dictatorship, but
rather of associating oneself with a dictatorial government in order to exploit workers
and companies, it’s very possible that, whenever the opportunity presents itself, those
businessmen linked to the Cuban government are going to be accused in court because
of the confiscation of 94% of the salary through the exchange of dollars for pesos and
other violations of the rules of the International Labor Organization. Workers’ claims
will be very high, and there are American law firms willing to bring them in exchange for
a percentage of whatever is eventually received.

Lastly, two articles of the Cuban constitution profile the inflexibly Communist nature of
the regime, and become a permanent threat against foreign investors. Article 5: The
Communist Party of Cuba, Marti-inspired and Marxist-Leninist, organized vanguard of
the Cuban nation, is the superior directing force of society and the State. Article 62:
None of the liberties recognized to citizens may be exercised against what is established
in the Constitution and laws, or against the decision of the Cuban people to build
socialism and communism. The violation of this principle is punishable.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025099
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016876.txt,"appreciated among AI researchers. AI risk is not yet common knowledge either. In
relation to the timeline of the first dissident message, I’d say we’re around the year 1988,
when raising the Soviet-occupation topic was no longer a career-ending move but you
still had to somewhat hedge your position. I hear similar hedging now—statements like,
“Tm not concerned about superintelligent AI, but there are some real ethical issues in
increased automation,” or “It’s good that some people are researching AI risk, but it’s not
a short-term concern,” or even the very reasonable sounding, “These are small-
probability scenarios, but their potentially high impact justifies the attention.”

As far as message propagation goes, though, we are getting close to the tipping
point. A recent survey of AI researchers who published at the two major international AI
conferences in 2015 found that 40 percent now think that risks from highly advanced AI
are either “an important problem” or “among the most important problems in the field.””°

Of course, just as there were dogmatic Communists who never changed their
position, it’s all but guaranteed that some people will never admit that AI is potentially
dangerous. Many of the deniers of the first kind came from the Soviet nomenklatura;
similarly, the AI-risk deniers often have financial or other pragmatic motives. One of the
leading motives is corporate profits. Al is profitable, and even in instances where it isn’t,
it’s at least a trendy, forward-looking enterprise with which to associate your company.
So a lot of the dismissive positions are products of corporate PR and legal machinery. In
some very real sense, big corporations are nonhuman machines that pursue their own
interests—interests that might not align with those of any particular human working for
them. As Wiener observed in Zhe Human Use of Human Beings: “When human atoms
are knit into an organization in which they are used, not in their full right as responsible
human beings, but as cogs and levers and rods, it matters little that their raw material is
flesh and blood.”

Another strong incentive to turn a blind eye to the AI risk is the (very human)
curiosity that knows no bounds. “When you see something that is technically sweet, you
go ahead and do it and you argue about what to do about it only after you have had your
technical success. That is the way it was with the atomic bomb,” said J. Robert
Oppenheimer. His words were echoed recently by Geoffrey Hinton, arguably the
inventor of deep learning, in the context of AI risk: “I could give you the usual
arguments, but the truth is that the prospect of discovery is too sweet.”

Undeniably, we have both entrepreneurial attitude and scientific curiosity to thank
for almost all the nice things we take for granted in the modern era. It’s important to
realize, though, that progress does not owe us a good future. In Wiener’s words, “It is
possible to believe in progress as a fact without believing in progress as an ethical
principle.”

Ultimately, we don’t have the luxury of waiting before all the corporate heads and
AI researchers are willing to concede the AI risk. Imagine yourself sitting in a plane
about to take off. Suddenly there’s an announcement that 40 percent of the experts
believe there’s a bomb onboard. At that point, the course of action is already clear, and
sitting there waiting for the remaining 60 percent to come around isn’t part of it.

3 Katja Grace, et al., “When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts,”
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.08807. pdf.

73

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016876
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026867.txt,"President Donald Trump on Wednesday called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to end
Robert Mueller's Russia probe ""right now,"" escalating his attacks on the inquiry.

""Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now,"" the
president wrote in a post on Twitter. ""Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry
Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!""

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

Phon i

x

Cl) iii”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026867
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031679.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 12/13/2018 10:01:57 PM
To: Kathy Ruemmler

Federal prosecutors are investigating whether U.S. President Donald Trump's inaugural
committee misspent some of the funds it raised, the Wall Street Journal reported on

Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter.

The probe opened by the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office is examining whether some of the committee's donors
gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing administration positions or access to the incoming

administration, the

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031679
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025927.txt,"On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Terry Kafka < wrote:

Agree. Funny, | too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She’s shameless!

Terry B. Kafka, President
Impact Outdoor Advertising Co.
5454 La Sierra Dr., Suite 200
Dallas, TX 75231

es:

Impactoutdoor.com

From: Philip Kafka [mailto
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM

To: Terry Kot

Subject: Re: Gingrich view of Trump
I openly and proudly support Trump.

I've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders.
Citing they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump
after she went on a rampage about him. It just shows, people HAVE NO IDEA what they are talking about.
Media holds the cards.... people are sheep.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:04 PM, hii. wrote:

Agree
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

From: Philip Katka _—-
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:01:58

To: Terry Kafka< Sa
Ce: Janet Kafka

Subject: Re: Gingrich view of Trump
And I believe we have a problem

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 9, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Terry Kafka iii wrote:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025927
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt,"From: Thomas Jr., mace 8 8=—C

Sent: 11/14/2016 2:54:06 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Trump

Importance: — High

do you agree with my thesis?

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

no intel but lots of profits

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon

wrote:

Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in
treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as
some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly
seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for

making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

http: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_ jr thomas/index

-htm|

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Landon Thomas, Jr.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013199.txt,"15.3 Dual Network Structure 283

biological process

—  e

physiological process cellular process

i5_a
cellular physiological process

cell cycle cell division
part_of is_a

M phase meiotic cell cycle Is_a

part_of cytokinesis
is_ a ~

M phase of meiotic cell cycle

part_of
Gyiokinesis after meiosis | >

Fig. 15.3: A typical, though small, subnetwork of the Gene Ontology’s hierarchical network.

the same purposes, they should be linked together. Portrayals of typical heterarchical linkage
patterns among natural language concepts are given in Figures 15.5 and 15.6. Just for fun,
Figure 15.7 shows one person’s attempt to draw a heterarchical graph of the main concepts
in one of Douglas Hofstadter’s books. Naturally, real concept heterarchies are far more large,
complex and tangled than even this one.

In CogPrime, ECAN enforces heterarchy via building SymmetricHebbianLinks, and PLN
by building SimilarityLinks, IntensionalSimilarityLinks and ExtensionalSimilarityLinks. Fur-
thermore, these various link types reinforce each other. PLN control is guided by importance
spreading, which follows Hebbian links, so that a heterarchical Hebbian network tends to cause
PLN to explore the formation of links following the same paths as the heterarchical Hebbian-
Links. And importance can spread along logical links as well as explicit Hebbian links, so that
the existence of a heterarchical logical network will tend to cause the formation of additional
heterarchical Hebbian links. Heterarchy reinforces itself in ""autopoietic attractor"" style even
more simply and directly than heterarchy.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013199
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010628.txt,"OGE Form 278e (March 2014)

Instructions for Part 1
Note: This is a public form. Do not include account numbers, street addresses, or family member names. See instructions for required information,

Filer's Name
Donald J. Trump

Part 1: Filer's Positions Held Outside United States Government

12 of 51

Jv JovganizntionName City State Organization Type Position Held an ee ear oe |
Yorktown Real Eslate LLC (F/K/A/ Yorktown Development Associates LLC ) New York, NY LLC Member/President 09/30/97 4/19/2017
ee The Fred C. Trump December 16, 1976 Trust- F/B/O Donald J. Trump New York, NY Trust Trustee December-76 1/19/2017
The Fred C. Trump December 16, 1976 Trust- F/B/O Robert S. Trump New York, NY Trust December-76 4119/2017
505 |The Fred C. Trump December 16, 1976 Trust- F/B/O Elizabeth J. Trump New York, NY Trust Trustee 1/19/2017
509 [Fred C. Trump, GRAT Trust- F/B/O Elizabeth Trump New York, NY Trust November-97 4149/2017
510 | Trust UMWIO Fred C. Trump- F/B/O Elizabeth Trump April-O4 4/9/2017
511 _ [Maryanne Trump GRAT Trust- F/B/O Elizabeth Trump Grau New York, NY Trustee November-97 4/19/2017
[Trust

4/19/2017

[512 | Trust UAW/O Fred C. Trump- F/B/O the grandchildren of Fred C. Trump _ New York, NY Trust Trustee
The Donald J. Trump grantor Trust - DJT is the Trustee Successor - Trustee is Donald J.
Trump, Jr. New York, NY Trustee November-97

514 12/31/2016
515 The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust New York, NY 4/19/2017
New York, NY Non profit Member of the Board July-86 1/19/2017
President 08/23/15 4119/2017
518 Director/Chairman/President 06/23/15 4/19/2017
DT Bali Hotel Manager LLC President 08/23/15 4/49/2017
[520 _ [DT Bali Hotel Manager Member Corp Director/Chairman/President 06/23/15 4/19/2017 |
DT Bali Technical Services Manager LLC 06/23/15 1/49/2017
[522 | OT Bali Technical Services Manager Member Corp
[523 [DT Connect Europe Limited
DT Endeavor | LLC
[525 [DT Endeavor | Member Corp
[526 _|DT Jeddah Technical Services Advisor LLC
DT Jeddah Technical Services Advisor Member Corp
DT Jeddah Technical Services Manager LLC 08/34/15
[529 | DT Jeddah Technical Services Manager Member Corp Director/Chairman/President 08/31/15
DT Lido Technical Services Manager LLC
[535 _| DT Lido Technical Services Manager Member Corp Corporation Director/Chairman/President
[536 [DT Marks Bali LLC LLC Member/President 06/23/45
DT Marks Bali Member Corp New York, NY Corporation Director/Chairman/President 06/23/15 1/19/2017
DT Marks Lido LLC New York, NY LLC Member/President 06/23/45
DT Marks Lido Member Corp New York, NY Corporation Director/Chairman/President 06/23/15
[eso fo ear ego y____f eM resigeng —_1__ovoang____ | tavonr_|
DT Tower | Member Corp
DT Tower ll LLG
[543 | OT Tower Il Member Corp Director/Chairman/President
544 _|DT Tower Kolkata LLC Member/President 44/255
DT Tower Kolkata Managing Member Corp New York, NY Corporation Director/Chairman/President 14/25/15
1546 _ [DT Venture I LLC New York, NY LLC President 01/04/16
DT Venture | Member Corp New York, NY Corporation Director/Chairman/President 01/0416
1548 _|DT Venture Il LLC New York, NY LLC President 01/04/16
ee] DT Venture Il Member Corp New York, NY Corporation Director/Chairman/President 01/04/16
DTTM Operations LLC New York, NY | Lue, Member/President O1/15/16

Gaps in numerical sequence are due to the removal of previously reported items no longer reportable on this part.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010628
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028761.txt,"Music As A Remedy For Parkinson's Gets Funding From Harvard University And...

MarketWatch (press release)
""The results are remarkable,"" Jeffrey Epstein asserted. ""Morestudies need to be done to showthat musicimproves motor coordination. However,
these studies highlighthow areas inthe auditory cortexare affected, providing aroad map forhowto...

See all stories on this topic »

Exceptional Public Schools Cited By Obama, Get Critical Backing From Investor_

U.S. Politics Today
Exceptional Public Schools Cited By Obama, Get Critical Backing From Investor, Jeffrey Epstein. Press release distribution provided

by US Politics Today.

World's Smartest Think Tank Gets Substantial Backing from The Jeffrey Epstein...
SacramentoBee
PRNewswire/ --Whathas been dubbed %22the world's smartest website%22and think tank from the UK's Guardian and Observer, The Edge
Foundation, has just received substantial backing from science philanthropistand Edgemember, Jeffrey Epstein. ...

A Genetic Approach For Crohn's And Colitis Disease Is Financed By The Jeffrey...
MarketWatch (press release)
NEY YORK, July 3, 2012/PRNewswire via COMTEX/-- The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, which actively supports science research, has given
substantial support to the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America to continue its Genetic Initiative tofinda...

Charter Schools In Washington DC Given A Boost By Education Philanthropist ...

MarketWatch (press release)
The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation which helped fund these schools, was establishedin 2000 to support science education throughoutthe United

States but has evolved to support inner city and youthbased education. ""Charterschools, though generally ...

Largest School In Haiti To Be Built With The Support Of The Jeffrey Epstein VI...
MarketWatch (press release)

NEWYORK, June 19, 2012/PRNewswire via COMTEX/-- The largest grade school in Haiti, called Ecole du Bel-Air, is currently under construction
inthe country's capital, Port-au-Prince, thanks to The Edeyo Foundation and the support of The Jeffrey ...

His 2fe 2s 24s 2s fs 24s ois 24s 2s fe 2fs of 2c ois 2fe oie fe 2fs fs 2s ois ofc ois 2fe ois fe 2s ois 2fe of 2fe 2s of 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe ois fe 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe 2s fe oie ois 2s ois 2fe ois 2s oie ok 2 ok

The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and 1s intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028761
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011536.txt,"ambitious. We intended to bug the communications line running east from
Banias, the Syrians’ base in the north of the Golan, toward Quneitra, their main
headquarters. That meant taking a longer route, beginning with a climb onto a
plateau about 200 feet high and crossing the Banias River toward the Syrian
base.

We had nearly three weeks for our final preparations. After two years of
sayeret training, I was confident that, physically, we would be up to the task.
But even without the obvious jitters emanating from the kirva, I could not help
but be aware of the possibility, and the cost, of failure. Every evening, I would
stake out time to go through everything that might conceivably go wrong. Years
later, when I went to do my graduate studies at Stanford, I was exposed to
words of wisdom from a non-kibbutznik — Benjamin Franklin — which probably
best summed up what drove my planning for the sayeret’s first operation, and
the others that would follow. “Failing to prepare,” he wrote, “is to preparing for
failure.”

Running into Syrian soldiers was, of course, top of the list of potential
pitfalls. But land mines were also a danger. I got a map of the area from military
intelligence which, in theory at least, showed the location of mines all along the
edge of the Golan. But it had been compiled over a period of nearly two decades
on the basis of information from shepherds, smugglers and the occasional Arab
agent. Whenever they reported seeing the telltale combination of fencing and
yellow danger triangles, the place was marked. Once it was marked, no one in
intelligence headquarters dared erase it. The result was that the map now
showed an almost unbroken stretch of mines. And within the amount of time
that we had to get ready, there was no way of knowing which of the minefields
was still there.

The timing was chosen by the cycle of the moon. We wanted to cross into
Syria in as near to total darkness as possible. That meant the final days of
September. Unlike Tubul, who had been commanding the team from the
moment they had joined the sayeret, I’d been working with them for only a
couple of months. My deputy for the operation, Avi Telem, was also a
newcomer. But he was smart, steady and he had served in the Golani Brigade,
so he knew the terrain along the border.

Avraham could not hide his own nervousness as the operation drew nearer.
A week before we were due to set off, he asked whether we were planning a
further, full-scale exercise. When I said the final run-through was set for the
following night, in the Negev, he told me he wanted Meir Har-Zion to attend.

65
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011536
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 11/7/2017 10:35:08 AM
To: Michael Wolff
Subject: boies

http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/

right on time, i didnt know. boies is hisco counsel. . represents ME that claims that al gore ,
and clinton were both on the island. he knows its not true , or could clearly ask hif former clients.

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015189.txt,"Johnnie Cochran Meets Dr. Hip

Tragedy and absurdity were two sides of the same coin: On one side,

O.J. Simpson’ s_ “suicide” note with a smiley face in the O of his
signature; on the other side, the woman who pinched Simpson lawyer
Robert Shapiro’ s ass because “I wanted to be part of history.” And
somewhere along the ridge of that coin was Simpson himself, walking into
the courtroom humming the melody of “Touch Me” from the Broadway
hit Cats and explaining to reporters that he was thinking about his
children.

That was at Simpson’ s criminal trial. Shortly before his civil trial
began in 1997, | met his lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran. He was the guest
of honor and luncheon speaker at a national convention of criminal
defense attorneys held in a huge banquet hall at a hotel in Santa Monica.
No media people were allowed entry.

One of the attendees was Dr. Eugene Schoenfeld, also known as Dr.
Hip from his days as a syndicated columnist for the underground press. He
now testifies occasionally as an expert witness, and was at this event for

that reason. My wife Nancy and | were his guests.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015189
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026697.txt,"UK challenges centred on currency, but future role
as European hub is unclear

While the UK has faced short-term challenges over low

interest rates (relative to the US), the Brexit decision
poses a threat to the long-term attractiveness of

the UK. Brexit is seen as a significant negative for
UK investment, and investment sovereigns with
European interests questioned the future of the UK
as an ‘investment hub’ for Europe, given uncertainty
over taxes on imports and market access. Liquidity
sovereigns also noted their concern that demand for
UK government bonds would drop, challenging the
liquidity of their holdings.

Despite this negative sentiment, UK allocations
remain relatively stable with stated declines
likely linked to currency fluctuations rather than
withdrawal, as demonstrated in figure 9. Furthermore,
the fall in value of the pound has led to a rally in UK
stocks as export-linked businesses benefit from more
competitive pricing. The low value of the pound also
allows UK asset managers to offer their services at
a discount to international competitors. This low
entry price into the UK represents an opportunity
for UK managers who can demonstrate local market
expertise and robust currency hedging processes to
international sovereign investors.

There has also been a demonstration of ongoing
sovereign commitment to long-term alternative
investments in the UK. Many sovereigns noted that
they were unlikely to cancel UK real estate assets
in the near future and there have been several
high-profile statements of renewed commitment to
UK infrastructure investments following the Brexit
decision, including Thames Water and Heathrow
Airport. However, respondents noted that these are
long-term investments which are unlikely to move
until the outlook of the UK as a preferred investment
destination (comparable to the US or Germany)
becomes clearer.

17

Mi 2016
M2017

Fig 9. Exchange rate, geographic allocations to the UK (% AUM)

GBP/USD exchange rate
(External data)

Geographic allocations
to the UK (% AUM)
(Sovereign sample)

LHS: Source - XE currency data. Data as of beginning of given year. RHS: Sample is based on
sovereign investors and excludes central banks. Data is not weighted by AUM.
Sample: 2016=55, 2017=57.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026697
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012017.txt,"US Department of Homeland Security Notice of Action
US Citizenship and Immigration Servii es Page 4 of 4

EACIA2eS50BU9 129)

designers. makeup 2rusis theht masters, slape technicians, and animal trainers

The dues you descnbe corresporal to business and management functions not to a position in the aris Belore
adjuthcation of your peliuon can proceed this discrepancy must be resolved

You may sull submit evidence to satisty tus requirement

The description must include

- Anexplanation ol the nature of Ihe events or activities,
Beginning and ending dates of the events of activities, and

A copy of any itinerary Ihat shows dates name(s) of ihe employer(s) amd jorauion of the event(s)

You must establish that the protiered position qualities as a position in the arts as described above Any anc! all claims
must he fully supported ly documentary evidence

CON A

FOR OFFICE USE USLY

Form 1-797 (B/03/90) Y

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012017
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021803.txt,"Lefcourt and Alan M. Dershowitz, a friend of his, to look into the backgrounds of his
young accusers.

Mr. Lefcourt says that the police acted “outrageously” and that his client has been
wrongfully dragged through the mud.

“He disputes that he ever had sex with any under-age person or anything like that,” said
Mr. Lefcourt, whose clients have included Russell Crowe, Martha Stewart and Abbie
Hoffman.

Neither the police nor the state attorney’s office would discuss the case in detail. But the
police released a thick report on the 13-month investigation after the indictment was
unsealed in late July.

The police started investigating Mr. Epstein in March 2005, almost immediately after
they were contacted by the stepmother of the 14-year-old, who, according to the report,
was in a special school for students with disciplinary problems.

The girl, the report said, told the police that an older friend had “offered her an
opportunity to make money” and had driven her to Mr. Epstein’s house one Sunday. The
friend, identified by the police as Haley Robson, a local community college student, told
the girl to say she was 18 if Mr. Epstein asked, the report said.

The girl told the police that Mr. Epstein’s assistant had led her upstairs to a room with a
massage table and that Mr. Epstein had come in and told her to remove her clothes. She
said Mr. Epstem had masturbated as she massaged him, had pressed a vibrator against her
underwear and had given her $300 afterward.

In October, the police interviewed Ms. Robson, then 19, who told them Mr. Epstein had
routinely paid her to bring teenage girls to his home. The police then interviewed a total
of 5 alleged victims and 17 witnesses, many of whom told similar stories about what they
had observed or participated in at Mr. Epstein’s home. According to the report, at least
one said Mr. Epstein had engaged in intercourse with her.

Mr. Lefcourt, his lawyer, said one girl who told the police of having had sex with Mr.
Epstein as a minor had lied about both the sex and her age and had not shown up for
grand jury questioning. He also said Mr. Epstein had passed a lie-detector test clearing
him of any sexual involvement with under-age girls.

A spokeswoman for the Palm Beach police said that early this year, the police went to
Mr. Krischer, the state attorney, intending to apply for warrants to arrest Mr. Epstein.
Instead, she said, they were told that Mr. Krischer would convene a grand jury to
examine the evidence and decide what charges, if any, to bring.

Around that time, the police report said, Mr. Dershowitz met with prosecutors to share
information about the accusers, including statements they had posted on MySpace.com,
the social networking site, concerning use of drugs and alcohol. According to the report,
Mr. Krischer’s office then decided to delay the grand jury session for several months.
The Palm Beach police grew frustrated, the report said, and on May | the department
asked prosecutors to approve warrants to arrest Mr. Epstein.

Chief Reiter also wrote Mr. Krischer questioning “the unusual course that your office’s
handling of this matter has taken” and suggesting that Mr. Krischer disqualify himself.

Chief Reiter refused several requests to be interviewed, and his spokeswoman would not

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021803
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017598.txt,"2005 London Bombings helped solidify the US-British working relationship. These France going-ons
are in higher gear (I've noticed) since Macron was elected but it was prepped for long ago. | was
working for IBM under IBM project manager Cathie Skoog at the NSF when my third trimester
pregnancy was sabotaged. The story of this sabotage and what followed is (briefly) this:

I've long-alleged that John and Avery Gunther (whose children | used to babysit) agreed to a quid
pro quo exchange of financial compensation for help destroying my credibility on behalf of IBM
against whom I'd filed a 2010 EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) charge and a
subsequent May 2011 civil suit.

Per the May 11, 2011 Complaint, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther:

3. On April 6, 2011 Mr. and Mrs Gunther, with uncontrolled greed and total disregard for the rights
and feelings of Ms. Nadine McGuire as well as those of their children, AFG and XWG, maliciously
and with ill-intent, wrongfully completed and executed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary
Injunction requesting formal protection against Ms. Nadine McGuire.

4. Over the course of the previous few months, Mr. and Mrs. Gunther, colluding with persons against
whom Ms. Nadine McGuire is currently furthering litigation, including but not limited to plaintiff's
mother, Pauline Scala McGuire, and from whom they received and/or have been promised to receive
monetary incentives, hid their relationships with said individuals, further lied about having those
relationships in direct conversation with Ms. Nadine McGuire and Court testimony on May 4, 2011,
and wrongfully completed and executed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction against
Ms. Nadine McGuire in cooperation and collaboration with said persons, resulting in the issuance of
a Temporary Restraining Order against Ms. Nadine McGuire issued on April 6, 2011.

- Initial Complaint, 5/11/11, McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther, Case No.:2011 CA 003703 B, DC
Superior Court, Judge Gregory Jackson presiding

In regards to the suit against IBM (McGuire v. IBM, 1:11CV528, US District Court of Virginia), the
only suit in which Pauline Scala McGuire was listed as a defendant, the most important claim was
one of “assault” that led to the 2007 death of my son. Per the filing:

Plaintiff, Grace Nadine McGuire, realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-65 hereof as if fully set
forth within and further alleges:

66. Defendant Palmisano's conduct in ascertaining the drug that was used on the plaintiff to end her
pregnancy and take the life of her child on April 22, 2007, constitutes an intentional touching of the
plaintiff by defendant Palmisano, and was undertaken deliberately and with actual malice towards
the plaintiff and her unborn child.

67. Defendant Skoog, Susan Horton and Scala's conduct in coordinating the circumstances, creating
physical proximity and the administering of the drug to the plaintiff that ended her pregnancy and
took the life of her child on April 22, 2007 constituted an intentional touching of the plaintiff by said
defendants, and was undertaken deliberately and with actual malice towards the plaintiff and her
unborn child.

... 69. As the direct and proximate result of defendant Palmisano, Skoog, Susan Horton, and Scala's
conduct, the plaintiff suffered a severe placental abruption, which terminated her pregnancy and
ended the life of her unborn child, causing the plaintiff to suffer damages including but not limited to
the loss of her child, loss of affection, grief, sorrow, extreme mental torment and emotional distress.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017598
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031889.txt,"14

There is another problem with realism. Like it or not, the United
States is a revolutionary power. Whether our government is trying to
overthrow foreign dictators is almost irrelevant; American society is
the most revolutionary force on the planet. The Internet is more
subversive than the CIA in its prime. The dynamism of American
society is constantly creating new businesses, new technologies, new
ideas and new social models. These innovations travel, and they
make trouble when they do. Saudi conservatives know that whatever
geopolitical arrangements the Saudi princes make with the American
government, the American people are busily undermining the core
principles of Saudi society. It’s not just our NGOs educating Saudi
women and civil society activists; it’s not just the impact of American
college life on the rising generation of the Saudi elite. We change the
world even when we aren’t thinking anything about global revolution —
when Hollywood and rap musicians are just trying to make a buck,
they are stoking the fires of change around the world.

A revolutionary nation cannot make a conservative foreign policy
work for long. In the 1820s and 1830s Washington tried to reassure
the Mexican government that it had no hostile designs against
Mexican territory. But the American people were moving into Texas
and the US government couldn’t stop that movement or blunt the
threat to Mexico if it tried. In the same way today, the economic and
political activity of individual Americans and American companies is
changing the world in ways that make life much harder for
governments in countries like Russia, China and Saudi Arabia. We
can press all the reset buttons with Russia that we want, but the
Russian government will still notice that both US society and
sometimes the government are actively working to help foreign
subversives overthrow repressive regimes.

Feckless Idealists

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031889
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023485.txt,"28

Republicans in Congress, he suggested, would shred that tradition
under cover of a debate that is only nominally about the budget. “The
fact is,” he said, “their vision is less about reducing the deficit than it
is about changing the basic social compact in America.”
Conservatives would and did object to his implication of
heartlessness, but not necessarily to his assessment of their ambition.
The Republican plan put forward by Representative Paul Ryan of
Wisconsin, the chairman of the Budget Committee, and adopted by
the House on Friday as its policy blueprint for the next decade
contains a substantial dose of deficit reduction but is really a
manifesto for limited government.

It would take big steps toward privatizing Medicare, slash upper-
income tax rates, repeal last year’s health care law, bite deeply into
nearly all federal programs and try to cap the size of government
relative to the economy. But it also imposes a self-consciously moral
judgment on the government’s role, suggesting that the same kind of
demand for added personal responsibility that was embedded in the
1996 overhaul of welfare should now be applied more broadly, to
food stamps, housing aid and health care for the elderly and the poor.
“The safety net should never become a hammock, lulling able-bodied
citizens into lives of complacency and dependency,” Mr. Ryan’s
budget proposal says.

William A. Galston, who was a domestic policy aide to President Bill
Clinton and is now a scholar at the Brookings Institution, said Mr.
Ryan deserved credit of a sort for addressing head-on the
implications of the Republican Party’s increasingly rigid antitax
posture, which since it took root in the late 1970s has put greater and
greater pressure on budgets and the social programs they support.

“It represents the first serious effort to begin to bring Republican
social policy commitments in line with their fiscal and tax
commitments,” Mr. Galston said.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023485
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016686.txt,"ull

Page 6 of 8

Tap B (3230). Table 1 arrays the target Primary and Secondary Drinking Standards, regulated
MCLs, required sampling frequency, and laboratory analytical results for the November 14,
2008-collected water samples.

Appendix A contains the laboratory analytical reports from HSA’s November 14, 2008
sampling event.

COMPARISON TO RECENT CITY MONITORING PROGRAM RESULTS

The City’s most recent annual compliance monitoring event for Primary and Secondary
Drinking Water Standards was performed in June 2008. The sample of ‘finished’ water product
was collected at a sampling point (laboratory tap) at the water treatment plant. Analysis was
performed by the City’s FDOH/NELAC-certified, vendor analytical laboratory, Genapure.
Analysis yielded all target parameter results below method detection limits (MDLs) or less than
respective maximum contaminant limits (MCLs) per Chapter 62-550, F.A.C.

The City’s most recent quarterly routine monitoring event for Nitrate and Nitrite was performed
in August 2008. The sample of ‘finished’ water product was also collected at the water
treatment plant’s laboratory tap. Analysis was again performed by the City’s vendor analytical
laboratory, Genapure. The detected concentration of Nitrate was less than the MCL (10 mg/L).
The concentration of Nitrite was below the MDL (< 0.053 mg/L). Nitrate concentrations from
HSA’s November 2008 sampling event are lower than either result reported from the City’s
annual or latest quarterly sampling from the water treatment plant's laboratory tap. The
difference between these results is not relevant since the reported concentrations from the City
and from HSA’s sampling event are still less than the MCL.

Table 1 includes a comparative array of the City’s monitoring program results to the results
from HSA’s November 2008 distribution system tap sampling for the target Primary and
Secondary Drinking Standards.

APPLICATION OF DISINFECTION CHEMICALS, BYPRODUCTS, AND THE EFFECT ON
TASTE
To eliminate the presence of microbiologics, such as Coliform bacteria, the City applies
chlorine at the treatment plant to disinfect the processed supply water. This treatment process
results in the formation of chemical compounds in the potable water product known as
Disinfection Byproducts (DBPRs). The allowable concentrations of DBPRs in drinking water
are set as Standards in FDEP rule 62-550, F.A.C.

The latest quarterly (3-month) reporting period for the City’s weekly routine monitoring of
DBPRs (Total Trihalomethanes, TTHMs) ended September 2008. The samples of water

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016686
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031651.txt,"communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031651
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027589.txt,"Is Invitation: No

GUID: C8CFFFA2-40B9-42AB-936D-AF 9B8A6EF763

Message: Never been interviewed by house , senate or mueller--- just campaign
spokesmodel

Time: 03/07/19 12:04:50 AM (573638690)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8D4A28D9-929B-4242-883B-5BEA8 8D5FA88

Message: https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-alan-dershowitz-and-pals-
accused-of-sex-trafficking-ring?ref=home

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/07/19 03:26:09 AM (573650769)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 24D2782B-E313-45C4-8FFE-1E590343B102

Message: More incoming. ! I guess hunker down wait until the waves stop.
thoughts? Ann Coulter also went after me.

Time: 03/07/19 04:06:21 AM (573653181)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7DO2FEE4-0560-48BD-8FD5-4D61A93FB537

Message: She is obsessed with u

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/07/19 04:07:20 AM (573653240)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

ral

GUID: E8655253-446D-47AB-8D46-9878B4C2FE36

Message: She should get in line

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/07/19 04:07:59 AM (573653279)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027589
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010600.txt,"Epstein’s Harassment of Witnesses Against Him

82. At all relevant times Edwards has a good faith basis to believe and did in fact
believe that Epstein engaged in threatening witnesses. See Incident Report, Exhibit “A” at p. 82,
USS. Attorney’s Correspondence, Exhibit “C” - Indictments drafted by Federal Government
against Epstein; and Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit “N” at 11.

83. Despite three no contact orders entered against Epstein (see Exhibit C, supra),
Edwards learned that Epstein continued to harass his victims. For example, Jane Doe had a trial
set for her civil case against him on July 19, 2010. As that trial date approached, defendant
Epstein intimidated her in violation of the judicial no-contact orders. On July 1, 2010, he had a
“private investigator” tail Jane Doe — following her every move, stopping when she stopped,
driving when she drove, refusing to pass when she pulled over. When Jane Doe ultimately drove
to her home, the “private investigator” then parked in his car approximately 25 feet from Jane
Doe house and flashed his high beam lights intermittently into the home. Even more
threateningly, at about 10:30 p.m., when Jane Doe fled her home in the company of a retired
police officer employed by Jane Doe’s counsel, the “private investigator” attempted to follow
Jane Doe despite a request not to do so. The retired officer successfully took evasive action and
placed Jane Doe in a secure, undisclosed location that night. Other harassing actions against
Jane Doe also followed. See Motion for Contempt filed by Edwards in Jane Doe v. Epstein
detailing the event, including Fisten Affidavit attached to Motion, Composite Exhibit “RR.”

Epstein Settlement of Civil Claims Against Him for Sexual Abuse of Children

84. The civil cases Edwards filed against Epstein on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane

Doe were reasonably perceived by Edwards to be very strong cases. Because Epstein had
35

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010600
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt,"From: Miller, Michael

Sent: 11/10/2016 10:28:58 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: RE:

Importance: — High

Michael C. Miller
Partner
www.steptoe.com/mmiller

Steptoe

direct Steptoe & Johnson LLP
fax 1114 Avenue of the Americas
cell New York, NY 10036

www.steptoe.com

This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message.

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:55 PM
To: Miller, Michael

Subject:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-

Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028991.txt,"Potential Customers

¢ Retail/Brands: We help businesses/retailers identify which customer is not
happy in seconds. We help them determine a customer’s intent and buying
habits. Also, we aid retailers and businesses with product development
ideas and go-to market strategies.

° Politics: Through the vast amount of data available across social media, we
can not only help politicians to understand what their constituents are
talking about but also to influence people, track voters and get them to
vote.

¢ Stocks: Investors who predict stock behavior by interpreting news and
public sentiment make better trades and informed decisions. InsightsPod
can give an insight into public sentiment quickly and can aid financial
institutions as well as individuals to make sound investment decisions.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028991
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031299.txt,"From: Nicholas Ribis 
Sent: 10/3/2018 3:10:21 PM 
To: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
In DC finalizing 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Oct 3, 2018, at 11:07 AM, J <jeevacation@gmail.corin> wrote: 
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:18 AM Nicholas Ribis <1> wrote: 
I will call u later 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Oct 2, 2018, at 7:27 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-
2018-10-02  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031299 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 031300 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029457.txt,"from the Gawker sale, and that is what I am trying to get,” he said. “I don’t want
the archives. I don’t think it makes sense to destroy them. Preserve them, study

them instead.”

Follow David Streitfeld on Twitter: @DavidStreitfeld.

—4

© ARTICLES REMAINING

Subscriber login

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029457
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030187.txt,"﻿Remembering Lenny Bruce

     August 3rd, 2016 marked the 50th anniversary of groundbreaking comedian Lenny Bruce’s death from an overdose of morphine, while his New York obscenity conviction at Café Au Go Go was still on appeal. On that same day he received a foreclosure notice at his Los Angeles home.
     But it wasn’t a suicide. In the kitchen, a kettle of water was still boiling, and in his office, the electric typewriter was still humming. He had stopped typing in mid-word: “Conspiracy to interfere with the 4th Amendment const”…constitutes what, I wondered.
     Lenny was a subscriber to my satirical magazine, The Realist, and in 1959 we met for the first time at the funky Hotel America in Times Square. He was amazed that I got away with publishing those profane words for which other periodicals used asterisks or dashes. He had been using euphemisms like “frig” and asked, “Are you telling me this is legal to sell on the newsstands?”
     I replied, “The Supreme Court's definition of obscenity is that it has to be material which appeals to your prurient interest.” He magically produced an unabridged dictionary from the suitcase on his bed, and looked up the word “pruient.” He closed the dictionary, clenching his jaw and nodding his head in affirmation of a new discovery. “So,” he observed, “it’s against the law to get you horny.”
     When we were about to leave the room, he stood in the doorway. “Did you steal anything?” he asked furtively. I took my watch out of my pocket since I didn't like to wear it on my wrist, and without saying a word I placed it on the bureau. Lenny laughed one loud staccato “Ha” and kissed me on the forehead.
     We developed a friendship integrated with stand-up comedy.	In his act Lenny had broken through traditional stereotypical jokes about airplane food, nagging wives, Chinese drivers, annoying mothers-in-law. Instead he weaved his taboo-breaking targets--teachers' low salaries versus show-business celebs, religious leaders’ hypocrisy, cruel abortion laws, racial injustice, the double standard between illegal and prescription drugs--into stream-of-consciousness vignettes.
     In each succeeding performance, he would sculpt and re-sculpt his concept into a theatrical context, experimenting from show to show like a verbal jazz musician. Audience laughter would sometimes turn into clapping for the creative process itself. “Please don't applaud,” he’d request. “It breaks my rhythm.” 
     Lenny was writing an autobiography--How to Talk Dirty and Influence People--which Playboy planned to serialize, then publish as a book, and they hired me as his editor. We met in Atlantic City, where he was taking Delaudid for lethargy, and he sent a telegram to a contact, with a phrase--DE LAWD IN DE SKY--as a code to send a doctor's prescription.
     At a certain point he was acting paranoid and demanded that I take a lie-detector test, and I was paranoid enough to take him literally. I couldn't work with him if he didn't trust me. We got into an argument, and I left.
     He sent a telegram that sounded like we were on the verge of divorce. “WHY CAN'T IT BE THE WAY IT USED TO BE?” he wrote. I agreed to try again, and in 1962 I flew to Chicago. Lenny was performing at the Gate of Horn, where he was asking the whole audience to take a lie-detector test.
     Lenny was intrigued by the implications of an item in The Realist, an actual statement by Adolf Eichmann that he would have been “not only a scoundrel, but a despicable pig” if he hadn't carried out Hitler's orders. Lenny wrote a piece for The Realist, “Letter From a Soldier's Wife,” namely Mrs. Eichmann pleading for compassion to spare her husband's life.
     Lenny had been reading a study of anti-Semitism by Jean-Paul Sartre. Now, on stage, giving credit to Thomas Merton's poem about the Holocaust, he requested that all the lights go off except one dim blue spot. Then he began speaking with a German accent:
    My name is Adolf Eichmann. And the Jews came every day to what they thought would be fun in the showers. People say I should have been hung. Nein. Do you recognize the whore in the middle of you–that you would have done the same if you were there yourselves? My defense: I was a soldier. I saw the end of a conscientious day's effort. I watched through the portholes. I saw every Jew burned and turned into soap.

    Do you people think yourselves better because you burned your enemies at long distance with missiles without ever seeing what you had done to them? Hiroshima auf Wiedersehen. [German accent ends.] If we would have lost the war, they would have strung Truman up by the balls, Jim. Are you kidding with that? Not what kid told kid told kid. They would just schlep out all those Japanese mutants. “Here they did; there they are.” And Truman said they'd do it again. That's what they should have the same day as Remember Pearl Harbor. Play them in unison.

     Lenny was arrested for obscenity that night. One of the items in the Chicago police report complained: “Then talking about the war he stated, ‘If we would have lost the war, they would have strung Truman up by the balls.’” The cops also broke open Lenny's candy bars, looking for drugs. They checked the IDs of audience members, including George Carlin, who told the cops, “I don’t believe in IDs.”  Then they arrested him for disorderly conduct, dragged him along by the seat of his pants and hoisted him into the police wagon. 
     “What are you doing here?” Lenny asked. 
     “I didn’t want to show them my ID.”
      “You schmuck.”
     Lenny was released on bail, but the head of the Vice Squad warned the Gate of Horn manager: “If this man ever uses a four-letter word in this club again, I'm going to pinch you and everyone in here. If he ever speaks against religion, I'm going to pinch you and everyone in here. Do you understand? You've had good people here. But he mocks the pope--and I'm speaking as a Catholic--I'm here to tell you your license is in danger. We're going to have someone here watching every show.”
And indeed, the Gate of Horn's liquor license was suspended. There were no previous allegations against the club, and the current charge involved neither violence nor drunken behavior. The only charge pressed by the city prosecutor was Lenny Bruce's allegedly obscene performance. Nobody’s prurience was aroused, but that made no difference. After all, there wasn’t any law against blasphemy. 
     “Chicago is so corrupt, it’s thrilling,” Lenny said.
     Chicago had the largest membership in the Roman Catholic Church of any archdiocese in the country. Lenny's jury consisted entirely of Catholics. The judge was Catholic. The prosecutor and his assistant were Catholic. On Ash Wednesday, the judge removed the spot of ash from his forehead and told the bailiff to instruct the others to do likewise. The sight of a judge, two prosecutors and twelve jurors, every one with a spot of ash on their foreheads, would have all the surrealistic flavor of a Lenny Bruce fantasy.
     Since he often talked on stage about his environment, and since police cars and courtrooms had become his environment, the content of Lenny's performances began to revolve more and more around the inequities of the legal system. “In the Halls of Justice,” he declared, “the only justice is in the halls.” But he also said, “I love the law.” Instead of an unabridged dictionary, he now carried law books in his suitcase. His room was cluttered with tapes and transcripts and photostats and law journals and legal briefs.
     Once he was teasing his ten-year-old daughter, Kitty, by pretending not to believe what she was telling him. “Daddy,” she said, “you'd believe me if it was on tape.”
Lenny's jazz jargon was gradually being replaced by legal jargon. He had become intimate not only with the statutes concerning obscenity and narcotics but also with courtroom procedure, and his knowledge would be woven into his performances. But as clubs became increasingly afraid to hire him, he devoted more and more time and energy to the law.
     In less than two years, Lenny was arrested 15 times. Club owners were afraid to book him. He couldn’t get a gig in six months. On a Christmas day, he was alone in his hotel room, and I brought him a $500 bill. With a large safety pin, he attached it to his denim jacket. When he finally got a booking in Monterey, he admitted, “I feel like it's taking me away from my work.”
Lenny lived way up in the hills. His house was protected by barbed wire and a concrete gate, except that it was always open. He had a wall-to-wall one-way mirror in his living room, but when the sun was shining you could see into the room instead of out. He was occasionally hassled by police on his own property. One evening in October 1963, we were talking while he was shaving, when four officers suddenly appeared, loud and obnoxious. He asked them to leave unless they had a search warrant.
     One of the cops took out his gun. “Here's my search warrant,” he said. Then Lenny and the cops had a discussion about the law, such as the rules of evidence, and after half an hour they left. Lenny tried to take it all in stride, but the encounter was depressing, and he changed his mind about going out that night.
     When everything was quiet, we went outside and stood at the edge of his unused swimming pool. Dead leaves floated in the water. Lenny cupped his hands to his mouth. “All right, you dogs,” he called out. “Bark for the rich man!”--thereby setting off a chain reaction of barking dogs, a canine chorus echoing through Hollywood Hills. 
     We ordered some pizza, and he played some old tapes, ranging from a faith healer to patriotic World War II songs. “Good-bye, Mama, I'm off to Yokohama, the Land of Yama-Yama…”
     Back at the Café Au Go Go arrest in New York, Lenny had told a fantasy tale about Eleanor Roosevelt, quoting her, “I've got the nicest tits that have ever been in this White House…” The top of the police complaint was “Eleanor Roosevelt and her display of tits.” At the trial, Lenny acted as his own attorney. He had obtained the legislative history of an Albany statute, and he discovered that back in 1931 there was an amendment proposed, which excluded from arrest in an indecent performance: stagehands, spectators, musicians, and--here was the fulcrum of his defense--actors. The law had been misapplied to him. Despite opposition by the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, the amendment was finally signed into law by then-Governor Roosevelt, but to no avail.
“Ignoring the mandate of Franklin D. Roosevelt,” Lenny observed, “is a great deal more offensive than saying Eleanor has lovely nay-nays.”
On October 13, 1965 (Lenny's 40th birthday), instead of surrendering to the authorities in New York, he filed suit at the U.S. District Court in San Francisco to keep out of prison, and he got himself officially declared a pauper. Two months before his death in 1966, Lenny wrote to me: “I'm still working on the bust of the government of New York State.” And he included his doodle of Christ nailed to a crucifix, with a speech balloon asking, “Where the hell is the ACLU?
After he died, at a séance, his mother brought his old faded denim jacket. That large safety pin was still attached to it. And at the funeral, his sound engineer friend dropped Lenny's microphone into his grave before the dirt was piled on. Lenny's problem had been that he wanted to talk on stage with the same freedom that he had in his living room. That problem doesn’t happen to stand-up comedians any more.
     As for me, I’m working on my long awaited (by me) first novel. It’s about a contemporary Lenny Bruce-type satirist. Those scenes where my protagonist performs, I’ve developed onstage myself, although at times it felt like I was actually channeling Lenny, until the day that he said, “C’mon, Paul, you know you don't believe in that shit.” Well, this ended that wishful-thinking delusion.
I told my friend Avery Corman--author of Oh, God and Kramer vs. Kramer-- how I welcomed the challenge of writing fiction.
“But, you know,” I added, “it’s really hard to write. You have to make everything up.”
And he said, “Hey, listen, you’ve been making stuff up all your life.”
     “Yeah, but that was journalism.”


The Last Word: Yikes!

     When George Bush was elected president of the United States in 2000, it was due to the electoral college, even though his opponent, Al Gore, won the national popular vote.
     Hillary Clinton was elected senator that year, and she announced that the first thing she would do was to get rid of the electoral college.
     A few years later, as a columnist for the New York Press, I sent her a letter asking about the status of that promise. She didn’t reply.
     On November 8, 2016, a crooked businessman, liar extraordinaire, bragging pussy-grabber, make-America-white-again, anti-choice, anti-Semite, fake Christian, the rapist of a 13-year-old girl in 1994 at a pedophile party (she canceled a press conference one week before the election because of death threats if she filed a lawsuit), climate-change hoaxer, twitter addict, homophobic, apprentice politician, fucking fascist, and of course Vladimir Putin’s “useful idiot,” namely Donald Trump, who was elected as an insanely narcissistic dictator based on the electoral college (a rigged system), whereas his opponent, Hillary Clinton, won the national popular vote by almost three million individuals galore, to no avail.
     Irony lives . . . 




"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030106.txt,"By Andrew Khouri

August 11, 2016

A federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East’s most prominent banks did not commit fraud and
steal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership
collapsed.

Orange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment
system because it didn’t want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan’s technology to launch its own service.

The Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan’s technology. It argued that it cancelled
the partnership because InfoSpan couldn’t produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an
established company, not one with little to no track record.

After deliberating for a day, the jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and
theft of trade secrets.

InfoSpan had asked for $540 million in damages. An attorney for InfoSpan declined to comment on the
possibility of an appeal.

The verdict capped a two-week trial that involved dueling accusations of fraud levied by high-profile attorneys
on both sides, including the former White House counsel to President Obama.

At the center of the high-stakes battle was San Juan Capistrano resident and entrepreneur Farooq Bajwa and a
mobile payment system that he said would allow migrant workers in the Middle East to send remittances back
home through text messages.

Bajwa contended that InfoSpan, with support from outside investors, spent $87 million developing the
business and technology.

To launch the system, known as SpanCash, Bajwa partnered in 2007 with Emirates Bank, which is controlled
by the United Arab Emirates’ sovereign wealth fund.

It seemed the ideal collaboration for the Pakistani immigrant, who earned millions operating another Irvine
company that manufactured computer components in the 1980s and 1990s

The Gulf States rely heavily on migrants to work construction and other low-wage jobs, offering a ready-made
market for SpanCash. InfoSpan aimed to allow migrants to transfer money back home far more cheaply than
Western Union or hawala, a traditional Middle Eastern broker-to-broker money transfer system.

A study from McKinsey & Co., cited in court records, projected annual revenue of $3.5 billion by the deal’s
fifth year, with InfoSpan receiving more than $2.8 billion in fees.

But the relationship between InfoSpan and Emirates Bank soured and the bank cancelled the deal in 2009.

A few days later, Emirates filed a criminal complaint in Dubai against Bajwa and a partner alleging that they
defrauded the bank and misrepresented InfoSpan as an established business with a working technology.

Two years later, InfoSpan sued in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana and alleged that its technology was working
and that it delivered its source code to the bank on servers. Emirates ended the deal, InfoSpan said, to launch
its own mobile payment system after stealing InfoSpan’s technology.

In court, an attorney for InfoSpan argued that Emirates torpedoed the InfoSpan relationship because it abhorred
how much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm.

“They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money,” attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing
arguments Wednesday.

Isaacson — a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator
David Boies — argued that the bank resorted to “pure extortion” in an attempt to get its way.

As a result of the bank’s criminal complaint, InfoSpan alleged Bajwa’s partner, Larry Scudder, was detained at
the Dubai International Airport and taken to a cell where he was locked in with 30 other men for 19 hours until
he secured his release by turning over his passport.

According to the lawsuit, Bajwa tried to resolve the situation but was told Scudder's passport would be
released and he could leave the country only if InfoSpan gave up ownership and control of SpanCash to the
bank.

Six months later, the bank withdrew the fraud accusations and Scudder got his passport back, but SpanCash’s
reputation was tarnished and it collapsed, Bajwa previously told The Times.

The bank disputed that it acquired InfoSpan’s source code or used it at any time.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030106
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028749.txt,"states, such as Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt. I think it is likely to happen
before too long.

TB: What about Syria?

DP: Assad’s power is steadily diminishing and I cannot see how his
regime will remain long in power.

TB: Should the United States get involved there?

DP: No, Americans have no dog in this fight and nothing in the U.S.
Constitution requires us to get involved in every foreign conflict. Two
wretched forces are killing each other; just look at the ghastly videos of
the two sides torturing and executing the other. Listen also to what they
are saying. It’s a civil war involving the bad and the worse. I don’t want
the U.S. government involved. That would mean bearing some moral
responsibility for what emerges, which I expect to be very unsavory.

TB: So you are supporting the Obama position?

DP: Yes, though he reaches it with far more angst. Also, there appears to
be some serious, clandestine U.S. support for the rebel forces. The
September 11 meeting in Benghazi between the Turkish and the American
ambassadors was very curious. They are both based in Tripoli, hundreds
of miles away. What were they doing in Benghazi? Arranging for
American arms going via Turkey to Syria, 1t appears.

TB: How important has Israel been to the revival of Islam?

DP: It is a major factor in the neighboring states. But elsewhere, in
Morocco, Iran, Malaysia, it has minor importance.

TB: Since the “Arab Spring,” Israel seems increasingly beleaguered.
DP: Not really, not yet, though I agree that it will be more beleaguered
with time. Its neighbors are so consumed with their own affairs that they
hardly pay Israel attention. But once the neighbors get their houses in
order, Israel will most likely face new difficulties.

TB: You have questioned U.S. support for Islamic democracy, which
does seem naive.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028749
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018584.txt,"have a problem with people choosing not to have sex... but I'm not sure how I feel about
actively convincing people not to have sex.

In America, I advocate for open, explicit, pleasure-affirming sex education. But that's a
radical stance even in America -- I'm not sure whether it's possible here! At least I'm
spotting a few allies, some in unexpected places: for instance, there's a great high-profile,
outspoken sex-positive educator named Agrippa Khathide in South Africa... who happens
to be a pastor. I'm starting to think there's room to do fascinating work here, creating
culturally appropriate sex-positive education.

Yet abstinence remains the only 100% effective tactic for avoiding HIV. As another
educator told me, ""I hate abstinence-only education more than anything. Seriously. But...
here, I think it's a necessary ingredient."" Is it responsible for me to avoid promoting
abstinence? Even if marketing abstinence means that to some extent, I'll have to tell
people sexual exploration isn't worth doing?

I'm still feeling out my approach, but... what if the most effective way to fight HIV is to
align myself with values antithetical to free sexuality? Does properly doing my job
require me to promote a sex-negative agenda? Surely not. Surely there are ways to
promote sex-positive abstinence -- perhaps a ""Vibrators for African Women"" program...?
(This is a joke. Mostly.)

And that's just one facet of the broader question keeping me awake at night! Which is:
given a fatal, incurable sexually transmitted infection; given a population where, in some
groups, up to 40% test positive; given a society in which culturally appropriate messages
emphatically do not include my pro-sex, pro-queer, pro-kink approach to sex education...
what does being a sex-positive educator mean?

Maybe I can harvest clues from my own feelings, past and present, about abstinence:
clues for how to promote it compassionately, effectively and responsibly; clues for
locating my boundaries when I talk about it. And maybe I can harvest down-to-earth
advice from my relationship with Mr. Chastity, too. I can work from toxic masculine
norms he's had such trouble with, and examine how men in southern Africa might
likewise worry about abstinence -- if you think American men have tough definitions of
sexual manliness to contend with, then try living in a place where the big men have
multiple wives and over a dozen children. I also think it'll be hot to be bound against
going ""too far."" Maybe I can learn how abstinence is fun, fun, fun!

Hey, at the very least, it'll give me a taste of what I'm telling everyone else to do.

KOK ok

The original version of this article can be found on the Internet, but please note that I've
done some editing for clarity. Here's the original:

http://carnalnation.com/content/45211/1133/sexual-abcs-africa-part-1-abstinence

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018584
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011278.txt,"Underweight positioning, buybacks resuming, positive momentum and strong fundamentals all indicate that there is still
further upside potential in financials (more details below). Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another
20-25% upside given the many levers to the Trump Trade: less regulation, higher interest rates, higher vol, economic
growth, loan growth, etc. The asset sensitive regional banks are more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the
larger cap banks as having multi-pronged upside given the aforementioned points.

That said, given the velocity and magnitude of the recent move and uncertainty around the impact and timing of
Trump’s policies, we believe options offer better risk-reward than being outright long financials stocks here. With flat
call skew, “appearing” call spreads with upside knock-ins price well.

Buy a 1 year XLF call spread for 2.6% premium

e Buy a 110% call

Sell a 117.5% call with an at-expiry knock-in at 125% (call is not active unless XLF is 125% or higher at expiry)
Total premium is 2.6%

Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.9x (7.5%/2.6%)

Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.7x (14.9%/2.6%) — you have upside up to 124.9%

o0o 0 @

Post Election Flow Skews - Buyers of Health Care (via ETFs) and Financials (mainly ETFs)

° US Buyback Flows

e Cons Disc, Technology and Financials are the largest 3 sectors for US buybacks (over 70% of execution). We
are seeing a seasonal increase in buybacks as we come out of the low seasonal month of the year (October) and should

see increased buyback executions until year-end, another source of upside for the Cons Disc, Technology and Financials
sectors.

Global Positioning, Nigel Tupper, 11/14. Large long-only funds are more underweight Financials than any other sector
and are UW this sector in all regions.

Future of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are
raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining
after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2)
potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration;
and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)

Trades Gaining Momentum: Finance-Related Assets vs. S&P 500

In the period since the US presidential election, the three top-performing S&P sectors and industry groups have all been
finance-related (Banks, Financials, Diversified Financials)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011278
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033150.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 6/1/2019 10:45:53 PM 
To: Nicholas Ribis 
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/446491-trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-
emmet-flood  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033150 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019842.txt,"| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 354 ® 9/30/16 8:13AM | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019842
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029331.txt,"RAFANELLI

Bryan Rafanelli
Biography

“If party planning is a fine art, then consider Bryan Rafanelli a virtuoso”
WCVB-TV Boston

“The event planner of the year”
Town & Country

Bryan Rafanelli’s exquisite sense of style, attention to detail and ability to transform clients’
visions into unforgettable celebrations have made him a go-to planner for the nation’s most
exclusive and high-profile events. He has produced it all, from elaborate fairytale-themed
fundraising galas for Massachusetts General Hospital for Children to Chelsea Clinton’s “wedding
of the decade” to State Dinners hosted by President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle
Obama.

Rafanelli and his firm, Rafanelli Events, have a simple philosophy: every event is a unique
creative challenge deserving of a one-of-a-kind approach. “My team listens to what you’re
imagining and then comes back with an idea you never expected,” he says. “We hone in on
every last detail so we can always deliver clients the highest level of service.”

The media has taken notice. A recent feature in OUT magazine reads, “For a flawlessly executed
affair to remember, a behind-the-scenes mastermind juggles the details. If you’re lucky, that
person will be event planner Bryan Rafanelli.” And the headline of a recent New York Times
profile —For Wedding Planner, Obsession with Privacy— reinforces that Rafanelli is tight-lipped no
matter whom the client is, letting his work speak for itself.

Rafanelli has been named “Man of the Moment” by Town & Country (2010), a 2011 “Innovator”
and “Event Producer of the Year” by BizBash, one of OUT magazine’s “100 Most Compelling
People in 2010”, a “Trendsetter of the Year” by Modern Bride, a “40 Under 40” by the Boston
Business Journal and “Best in Boston” eight years running by Boston magazine. His events have
been highlighted in: The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, People,
New York, CBSNews.com, VanityFair.com, NewYorker.com and more. Rafanelli has also
appeared as an industry expert on regional and national television programs including: “The
Martha Stewart Show”, ABC’s “Good Morning America”, NBC’s “The Today Show” and as a
regular contributor on New England Cable News’ “Morning Show.”

Rafanelli grew up in a large Rhode Island family, his mother always finding reason to throw
parties for the people she loved. “The sense of community and of bringing people together to
have good time just for ‘good time’s sake’ has always been inside me,” he says. He launched
Rafanelli Events in 1996 as a three-person operation executing only a handful of events a year. It
has quickly evolved into a full-service event design, strategy, planning and production company
with more than 100 events annually in venues around the world. Headquartered in Boston,
Rafanelli Events also has offices in New York City, Washington, DC and Palm Beach.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029331
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026083.txt,"From: 
Sent: 5/14/2017 9:38:47 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think.. and if peace agreement 
was signed in kuwait that would be 414141414141e 
Sent from my iPhone 
On May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi 
meeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon, email you after. how much fun 
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM, - 1> wrote: 
very well many thnx and here is a refrence: 
KUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017 
BRUSSELS, May 5 (KUNA) -- Yemeni Foreign Minister Abdulmalik Al-Makhlafi said Friday that the 
Yemeni government is adhering to the peace process and is ready to go back to the table to bring peace to 
Yemen as soon as possible and to save the people from more suffering. 
""But the positive position of the government does not get any response by the revolutionaries who are still 
refusing the demands for peace or to accept any international peace efforts,"" he told the Kuwait news agency, 
KUNA, in an exclusive interview at the end of his visit to Brussels. 
Al-Mekhlafi said they went ""to our brotherly country Kuwait"" which hosted the meeting for four months last 
year. ""After the consultations the UN envoy presented the draft agreement and we signed it but the other side 
did not sign it,"" he noted. 
""But after we left Kuwait and till now the revolutionaries did not undertake any steps proposed by the UN 
envoy, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. We regret that peace is on hold due the desire of the revolutionaries to 
continue the war,"" he said. 
Al Makhlafi said that the government would continue to call for peace and hopes that the international 
pressures and defeats that the revolutionaries have suffered until now will make them respond to the peace 
efforts. 
""We were hoping to return again to Kuwait for the talks and our Kuwaiti brothers welcomed the return of the 
two delegation in Kuwait in order to sign the agreement,"" he noted. 
The Yemeni foreign minister expressed his deep appreciation and thanks to HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-
Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, to the Kuwait government and to HE the first deputy prime minister and foreign 
minister Sheikh Sabah Khaled al-Sabah who exerted great efforts during the Kuwait meetings. 
""We look forward to return to Kuwait, and our brothers in Kuwait are rightly saying that we will welcome you 
if you sign the agreement and not to waste time. But it appears that the revolutionaries are not ready to respond 
to this step,"" he said. 
Al Meahlafi said he visited Brussels for two-days of talks with the Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders, 
European Commission officials and Members of the European Parliament to explain the situation in Yemen 
and seek support for the Yemeni government's peace efforts. 
He said the Yemeni government seeks peace based on the three references, the Gulf initiative, the outputs of 
the national dialogue, and the Security Council resolutions on Yemen, including resolution 2216. 
The Yemeni foreign minister called on the EU to condemn the revolution and the Iranian interference in 
Yemen, which is sending arms to the Houthi militias. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026083 
He also expressed his thanks to the EU for their humanitarian aid and for pledging the amount of 116 million 
euro (USD 127 mn) during the UN-sponsored donors conference on Yemen held recently in Geneva. (end) 
nk.mb 
Sent from my iPhone 
On May 14, 2017, at 11:25 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
i will ask, get back to you tomorw 
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:23 PM, 
how about the war in yemen? 
<MMIIMI=> 
wrote: 
Sent from my iPhone 
On May 14, 2017, at 10:25 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
it depends on which subject. . economic. military, tech? 
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:17 PM, <IMMIIIIIMIMI> wrote: 
any tips on how we should communicate with him? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On May 14, 2017, at 9:35 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
much to do around the trump trip. I hope you are enjoying. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026084 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026085 
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031137.txt,"What’s more, there’s plenty of evidence that the main thing propping up the
stock prices is heavy buying by the companies themselves [via share

repurchases].

And now, that prop is getting kicked out from under the stock market.

Bloomberg:

After snapping up trillions of dollars of their own stock in a five-year
shopping binge that dwarfed every other buyer, U.S. companies from Apple
Inc. to IBM Corp. just put on the brakes.

Announced repurchases dropped 38% to $244 billion in the last four months,

the biggest decline since 2009...

Recommended Links

Rickards: ""Warning, l’ve Changed My Thesis On Gold""

| firmly believe we're at the beginning of the BIGGEST move the world
has ever seen in gold. ""Simple math"" says $10,000 gold is all but certain. But, you’re
not going to believe what | have to say next... BEFORE you buy a single ounce of
gold, read this important message.

Last Chance: VIP Access To Doug Casey’s Shocking 2016
Forecast

Casey fears a severe crisis is brewing. Not a currency collapse or stock market crash.
A specific threat that could wreak more havoc than the Great Depression. That’s why
tomorrow, in an urgent broadcast event, Doug’s pulling back the curtain on his
shocking warning. And revealing how to profit from it in the months ahead, in a big
way. Last chance to get VIP access ends tonight. Click here now for full details.

Pareto’s “Foxes”

Although the bull market in U.S. stocks is probably near its end, the bull

market in the Deep State shows no sign of weakening.

Year after year, the power of the “foxes” grows.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031137
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032686.txt,"The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032686
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015837.txt,"Chapter 6

KITTENS &
GORILLAS

Orangutan and Kitten

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015837
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033598.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

De ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee a

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033598
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032692.txt,"From: Thomas Jr., Land A

Sent: 1/3/2018 7:12:17 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly
unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:04 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
yup

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Thomas Jr., Landon
I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

http: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_ jr thomas/index
.htm|

please note

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032692
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031123.txt,"asset globally where vols are up this year — and the one with broader consequences for neighbors (through EM Asian intervention
policy). Hence, this week's focus in our FX Markets Weekly on two other dimensions of the bearish yen view: what is the currency
worth if the BoJ successfully delivers 2% inflation, and how broad is the yen short.

° To those who believe in purchasing power parity (and we are not amongst them), USD/JPY could move to 100 on a credible
BoJ. Realizing these extreme targets requires Japanese participation in this yen move, since international investors could reach their
risk limits on yen shorts. So far domestics look fairly unconvinced. Japan has been posting net capital outflows (foreign purchases of
JGBs minus Japanese purchases of foreign bonds) since mid-2011, but the pace of those outflows has not increased since then-
candidate Shinzo Abe began calling for much looser monetary policy. Stay short yen on the possibility that locals join the move, but
rotate exposure. Book gains on a KRW/JPY one-touch, a USD/JPY seagull and CHF/JPY cash. Stay long NOK/JPY and re-enter
EUR/JPY (both in cash). Stay short USD vs a basket of AUD, RUB and KRW.

Commodities

° Commodities are up around 1% this week, with all sectors gaining ground. In Wednesday’s GMOS, we retained all our
previous positions. Our main trades are long Brent time spreads (long front vs. third futures contract), long industrial metals, long US
natural gas and short agriculture. Production losses in the North Sea should support our Brent trade, while the current economic
rebound in China should push industrial metals higher. US Natural gas should benefit from the ongoing switch from coal to gas for
power generation and 2013 should see the first slowdown in production since the boom began five years ago.

e The GSCI agriculture index has already reversed around 80% of its rise in summer 2012 as farmers have planted a much
larger area, which means a higher likelihood of much higher future supply. We stay short for now as we think this downtrend has
further to go. We are also long gasoil vs. Brent. Global inventories are very low and demand from Asia is picking up, consistent with
the economic data, which we expect to improve further over the coming months. An expected cold snap should also help push demand
higher through January

e We took profit on our long position in gold last Friday and year-to-date gold is down around 1%. We believe many investors
had bought gold over the past few years to hedge against the risk of “QE unlimited.” The recent FOMC minutes, however, have since
raised the risk of an early end to QE, reducing to need to hedge through gold. The risk is thus that a number of market participants will
reduce their gold hedges, pushing gold prices down further. We still like gold as a hedge against long-term inflation risks once global
growth returns to trend and we would look to reopen the position at around $1,550/oz..

Jan Loeys
(1-212) 834-5874

jan.loeys@jpmorgan.com

John Normand
(44-20) 7134-1816
john.normand@jpmorgan.com

Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou
(44-20) 7134-7815

nikolaos.panigirtzoglou@jpmorgan.com

Seamus Mac Gorain
(44-20) 7134-7761
seamus.macgorain@jpmorgan.com

Matthew Lehmann
(44-20) 7134-7813
matthew.m.lehmann@jpmorgan.com

Leo Evans
(44-20) 7742-2537
leonard.a.evans@jpmorgan.com

If you no longer wish to receive these e-mails then click here to unsubscribe www.jpmorganmarkets.com

Analyst certification: I certify that: (1) all of the views expressed in this research accurately reflect my personal views about any and all of the subject
securities or issuers; and (2) no part of my compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views
expressed herein. Important disclosures, including price charts, are available for compendium reports and all J.P. Morgan—covered companies by
visiting https://mm.jpmorgan.com/disclosures/company, calling 1-800-477-0406, or e-mailing research.disclosure.inquiries@jpmorgan.com with

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031123
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031753.txt,"﻿Operation Chaos Lives
By Paul Krassner
If a psychologist testing you in a free association method said “Vietnam War deserters” you most likely would reply “Canada.” However, Matthew Sweet, the British author of Operation Chaos: The Vietnam Deserters Who Fought the CIA, the Brainwashers, and Themselves, would definitely respond “Stockholm,” as proven by his nonfiction book’s comprehensive research. By 1968, more than a thousand deserters and draft resisters had escaped to Sweden.                                                                                                                     
     Many of them formed a group named the American Deserters Committee.  That ADC might just as well have served it as insane inadvertently satire. For example, a few friends kept a woman in her in her apartment, playing Beethoven in an attempt to reprogram her brain. An individual insisted that the Beatles were created as an instrument of psychological warfare. And the author himself became to believe the genocidal ambitions of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth’s secret plot to start World War III. And now, for whatever purpose, Donald Trump has met the same Majesty Queen Elizabeth.                                     
     Back In January 1974, journalists and activists whistle-blowers revealed the truth that there was a takeover by the CIA of the United States. Indeed, Lyndon LaRouche, the leader of a growing cult, spoke as his longtime alias, Lyn Marcus, to the audience in a New York shabby ballroom. He began describing the second phase of a psy-war game designed by the CIA, conducted on four continents, turning some of their most trusted colleagues into killers, drugged and imprisoned, reconditioned their minds, erased their memories of the experience, and returned to their friends as unknowing vehicles of a murderous conspiracy.
     The American CIA was then to be performed at a secret facility near Stockholm, where Marcus explained how brainwashed candidates were hypnotized, subjected to electric shocks, forced to eat their own excrement, endure sexual humiliation, and tortured until they whined like puppies. Once they had been reduced to mental pulp, the programming began.
     A literal kind of programming, following the rules of the computer age. Numbers linked to functions. Infinite loops of coded instructions, drilled into the subject by repetition, violence, the application of electrodes to bare skin. Finally, cyanide pills had been secreted inside their bodies, in order to eliminate the killers once they had fulfilled their programs. 
     No wonder Sweet admitted, “If I were to die without finishing this book, then someone out there would undoubtedly set up a Web page claiming that I’d been bumped off, by either the CIA, the Swedish secret services, or the bizarre political group that had once counted many of my interviewees as its members—and would, by the time my research was concluded, come to regard me as an enemy infiltrator. And that was then I knew I’d been swallowed by my own story. Swallowed, but not brainwashed.” He’s still alive.
     Back in New York, at the National Caucus of Labor Committees, Marcus was the leader of Students for a Democratic Society. For better or worse, he was delivering a charismatic economics lecture to an enthusiastic SDS crowd. In 1968 that summer, they protested the Vietnam War at the National Democratic Convention in Chicago. The Yippies nominated a pig as a presidential candidate, and I started a rumor that we planned to drop LSD into the reservoir. And yes, Lyndon LaRouche decided to drop his alias into pure manure.
     He was an unlovable conspiracy theorist who ran for the U.S. presidency eight times. He played himself as a cartoon character in an episode of The Simpsons in which aliens kidnapped presidential candidates Bill Clinton and Bob Dole, Immersing them in tanks of bubbling pink liquid. Homer shouted, “Oh my God! Lyndon LaRouche was right!” And Saturday Night Live featured “Lyndon LaRouche Theater,” in which Randy Quaid played LaRouche, with a bald wig, bow-tie and spectacles, narrating melodramatic twists, conspiracies, and confessing “I am insane.”
*    *    *
     Not mentioned in the book, near the end of March 1981, I delivered a keynote address at the Youth International Party convention in New York. These were the latterday Yippies, originally launched as the anti-Yippie “Zippies” during the 1972 both conventions in Miami. I asked the audience a rhetorical question, “How would you like to be a Secret Service agent guarding Ronald Reagan, knowing that his vice president, George Bush, is the former head of the CIA?”
     Once again, satire would be outdistanced by reality. On March 30, the president was shot by John Hinckley in order to make a favorable impression on actress Jodie Foster so that he could take her bowling on a date. Ironicallly, Hinckley came out for gun control, and Reagan came out against it.
I was scheduled to perform stand-up at Budd Friedman's Improvisation comedy club in Hollywood in April. He asked me to try and get some advance publicity. On April 2, the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner quoted a dispatch from the New Solidarity International Press Service:
    A group of terrorists and drug traffickers linked to Playboy magazine met in New York City's Greenwich Village area and publicly discussed an assassination of President Ronald Reagan and Vice-President George Bush. The meeting convened by the Yippie organization, featured former Playboy editor Paul Krassner and numerous individuals associated with High Times magazine, Hustler magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times.

    In a statement this afternoon, national Democratic Policy Committee advisory board chairman Lyndon LaRouche urged that this information be made public at this time as a means of assisting government investigators pursuing the assassination attempt against President Reagan. Playboy magazine, as an international dossier released in the March 30, 1981, issue of New Solidarity indicates, is at the center of an international apparatus that has in the past been directly implicated in high-level political assassinations.

Playboy’s response: “Absolute, unequivocal nonsense.” And Budd Friedman said, “Paul, that's not exactly what I meant by advance publicity.” My show went fine, but in July, New Solidarity escalated the attack and published a whole dossier on me:
In the early 1950s, Paul Krassner was recruited to the stable of pornographers and “social satirists” created and directed by the British Intelligence’s chief brainwashing facility, the Tavistock Institute, to deride and destroy laws and institutions of morality and human decency. Among Krassner's circle of Tavistock iconoclasts, peddling smut in the name of humor and “creative expression,” were Lenny Bruce…

These people were taken seriously in certain quarters. LaRouche received enough campaign contributions to qualify him for matching funds from the government. And the U.S. Labor Party’s newsletter, Investigating Leads, was subscribed to by police departments across the country.
In fact, when two thousand demonstrators protested the construction of the Seabrook nuclear power plant in New Hampshire, LaRouche's private intelligence network briefed a state police lieutenant that the demonstration would be “nothing but a cover for terrorist activity”--the exact same phrase the governor would use to the media a few days before the rally.
Incidentally, I was never in England. Moreover, Tavistock…Tavistock…I just couldn't seem to remember anything about ever having been brainwashed at the Tavistock Institute. They must've deprogrammed it right out of my consciousness.
*    *    *
Although LaRouche and I both taught at the Free University of New York in 1966, we didn’t cross paths. One student said that “LaRouche presented the most credible, most articulate, and best-argued version of Marxist economics that I ever heard.” My class was titled, “Journalism and Satire and How to Tell the Difference.” My countercultural friend Ed Sanders—leader of the Fugs band and publisher of Fuck You/A Magazine of the Arts—taught “Revolutionary Egyptology.” In 1967, he orchestrated the levitation of the Pentagon. 
LaRouche and his followers spent the year 2016 snickering behind their hands at the Republican candidate for the U.S. presidency. The organization even recorded a satirical song suggesting that the candidate’s core constituents were mentally ill. The singer trilled: “He’s a festering pustule on Satan’s rump! Don’t you be a chump for Trump!” 
     But when Hillary conceded defeat, the tune changed. Suddenly, Trump was not, as had been previously thought, a maniac poised to legalize heroin and govern on behalf of Wall Street, but America’s best chance to defeat the British Empire and forge a new alliance with Russia.
It has been said that LaRouche’s wife, Helga, “keeps him on a tight leash.” She is a German political activist, and founder of the LaRouche movement's Schiller Institute, an international political and economic think tank, one of the primary organizations, with headquarters in Germany and the United States, and supporters in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Russia, and South America, among others. 
     Helga outlines the great potential for the world if a Russia, China and U.S. partnership develops to fight terrorism and develop the world economy. Trump’s successful meetings with China's president Xi Jinping and Russian President Putin is promising. However, that relationship will only improve if the American people step up to the challenge to ignore the British media campaign attempting to subvert his presidency, and fight to implement LaRouche's Four Law economic development program.
     Helga believes that only with the support of the population will Trump be able to fulfill his campaign promises to the American people to restore Glass-Steagall and rebuild the country. The Glass-Steagall Act was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 as the Banking Act, which prohibited commercial banks from participating in the investment banking business. Helga makes an appeal from abroad to the American people not to miss this great historic opportunity. Dictator Trump has evolved from FDR’s fireside chat to morning tweets. Feckless cunt, anyone?

Zapped by the God of Absurdity: The Best of Paul Krassner will be published in 2019 by Fantagraphics with an introduction by Andy Borowitz.














"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015823.txt,"Knowledge 133

The Problem

One suggestion put forward by Daniel Dennett is the creative process
is a two-part task — generate ideas, then critically assess them. I can, in
principle, make a program write out every possible book less than 500,000
words long. Provided I don't store the results this will not collapse the
Universe. This just leaves the problem of writing another program to
read all the output and ring a bell each time it finds some interesting
truth. This second program might be called an appreciation program.
Let’s examine this approach. I can write out a very simple program to do
this — provided I cheat and ignore the complexity of the term ‘something
interesting. In plain English: Count up from one until I get an interesting
fact, write it down and stop.

Loop i++ until i == (Something Interesting), Print i

This generates two problems. We need to make a program that
can tell if something is interesting and it will need to be fast because it
is going to be handed a huge amount of junk. Clearly I have a process
running in my brain that can determine if something is interesting, but it
is quite slow. It takes me an appreciable time to open a book, leaf through
the pages and declare it either junk or interesting. Leo Tolstoy had a
process in his brain that allowed him to create something interesting but
I want to prove he did not do this by generating random junk and sifting
through it. Let’s look at the mathematics.

We know simply counting sequentially through every number
would take too much time, but why not generate random numbers and
run our critical eye over them? Surely this would give a faster result. Let
us try with a short poem. How hard would it be to come across something
as simple as a four-line poem using this technique?

This poem, by the late Spike Milligan, is only 23 words long,
including the title, and I have a powerful computer. Wouldn't it be
possible to generate it using a computer? Unfortunately, no. We humans
don't have a good head for large numbers and this problem is much
harder than it appears. Let’s use playing cards to get a feeling for large
numbers.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015823
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018590.txt,"to pieces, and it's much harder to speak against condoms when funeral processions wind
through your neighborhood every weekend. Occasional religious educators claim that
promoting condom usage waters down their message and therefore makes anti-HIV
education less effective; but most churches I've encountered take a pragmatic, condom-
promoting approach. Indeed, one of the best HIV curricula I've seen so far is the
""Channels of Hope"" workshop, created by the Christian organization World Vision and
designed to train church groups. It not only promotes explicit condom education, but
urges compassion towards sex workers and homosexuals. And it discusses why marital
rape isn't okay! I'd venture to say that the majority of liberal, secular sex education
curricula in the USA aren't as awesome.

Just the other day, I was surveying a bunch of kids aged 11-13 and they asked how to put
on a condom. Cursing myself silently, I had to admit that I didn't have any to show
them... at which point one child dashed from the room and returned minutes later bearing
both a condom, plus a rather splintery stick from a firewood pile. Condom distribution is
in full swing; I can think of three places to pick up free condoms within a ten-minute
walk from where I'm seated. Condoms are described in kids' textbooks, and condom
demonstrations are welcome in every school. Condoms are lauded by politicians, pop
icons, and religious leaders. Take any person off the street and they'll know the HIV-
prevention mantra: ABC -- Abstain, Be faithful, use Condoms. Yet condom usage rates
are still killingly low.

KK ok

Though I'm fishbelly-pale, I'm not great at wearing sunscreen, and I live in Africa. I try...
I mean, I kinda try... I mean it's so annoying to apply, and it feels gross! And this
notwithstanding the fact that I literally have ten bottles of top-quality, non-sticky, oil-free
sunscreen sitting across the room from me as I type this. On the other hand, I religiously
take my malaria prophylactic pill; I've noticed no side effects, and getting malaria would
really suck.

I recall one recurring conversation between myself and a former boyfriend, whom I dated
for years. We'd both had excellent sex education, and yet we used withdrawal as our
primary birth-control method. We did it even though we both had boxes of condoms
available. We did it even though neither of us wanted me to get pregnant, and -- though
I'm definitely pro-choice -- I wasn't sure I could bring myself to have an abortion. We'd
both been tested, and we trusted each other not to cheat, but that's some dangerous trust
to extend -- and we knew it.

One particular moment comes to mind: we were lying lazily in bed together, talking
about how stupid we were.

""We should be more careful,” he said seriously.
""We really should,"" I agreed.

""Let's be more careful,” he suggested.

I nodded.

We weren't.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018590
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.txt,"faSadisGoldbers,

Edited by Yelena Maltser « ymaltser@sglawyers.com

S&G INVESTMENT
MANAGER ,

SUPREME COURT REJECTS NEWMAN
REQUIREMENT OF “PECUNIARY OR
SIMILARLY VALUABLE” PERSONAL BENEFIT
FOR INSIDER TRADING LIABILITY FOR
‘TIPPING FAMILY AND FRIENDS

BY SAMUEL J. LIEBERMAN

The U.S. Supreme Court gave the government a
major victory in Salman v. U.S.,. which lowers
the standard for proving insider trading involving
tipping family or friends, and will embolden the
government to bring similar cases. Sa/man holds
that a gift of inside information to a family or
friend is sufficient to prove insider trading tip-
ping liability—even If the tipper did not receive a
valuable guid pro quo in exchange for the tip. This
significantly narrows U.S. v. Newman, in which

Salman will almost certainly embolden the SEC and federal
prosecutors to bring more insider trading cases, because it is

much easier for the government to prove a “gift” to a “friend”
than to prove a “pecuniary” or similar quid pro quo.

the Second Circuit (a lower appellate court) held
that a tipper must receive “at least a potential
gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature,”

(continued on page 2)

Status of the New DOL Fiduciary Rule

BY DANIEL G. VIOLA
Reprinted with permission of Hedgeweek

The Department of Labor's (the “DOL’) new
fiduciary ruling (the “Rule”) has created strife
in the securities industry and has the potential
to significantly impact how financial advisers
and brokers will manage retirement accounts
in the future.

Currently, brokers, financial advisers, and other
finance professionals do not legally have to act

in a client’s best interest, with few exceptions,
such as those who are registered as investment
advisers with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission or in individual states. Those who
are not registered, like brokers, just have to prove
that the investment is suitable, not necessarily
the best option, for their client—no matter that
that fund might be more expensive and provide

(continued on page 2)

a Inside this Issue

1

Supreme Court Rejects Newman
Requirement of “Pecuniary or Similarly
Valuable” Personal Benefit for Insider
Trading Liability for Tipping Family and
Friends

Status of the New DOL Fiduciary Rule

A Cautionary Tale in the Use of Non-
Compete Agreements

The Question On All Of Our Minds: What
Impact Will the Trump Administration
Have on the Hedge Fund Industry?

Compliance Deadlines — Second Quarter
2017

SEC & FINRA Release 2017 Exam
Priorities

Gregory Hartmann Joins Sadis &
Goldberg's Corporate and Financial
Services Practices

Recent and Upcoming Events

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033144.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 5/13/2019 8:36:29 PM 
To: Richard Kahn 
trump goin to lutniks house on thurs 
; Darren lndyke 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033144 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325.txt,"From: Tyler Shears as

Sent: 3/20/2014 2:46:17 PM

To: Christina Galbraith

cc: jeevacation@gmail.com

Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein, Harvard and Science Magnate, Applauds Congress' Largest Bill for Melanoma - CNBC

Importance: — High

We are pushing to help get this up but having Bill Clinton in the other is making it tough to pop
anything other up. Check again in 8 hours

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Christina Galbraith ee «:::
>
> Hi Tyler,
>
>

See the press release published this morning. Everyone's picking it up but don't see it on googles list
page yet. Tough because Daily Mail has about 3 new articles out
>
> http://ww.cnbc.com/id/101510498
>
>
> Christina Galbraith
>
>

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029325
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010614.txt,"Disclosures
Important Disclosures

BofA Merrill Lynch Research Personnel (including the analyst(s) responsible for this report) receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall profitability of Bank of America
Corporation, including profits derived from investment banking. The analyst(s) responsible for this report may also receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall
profitability of the Bank’s sales and trading businesses relating to the class of securities or financial instruments for which such analyst is responsible.

BofA Merrill Lynch Global Credit Research analysts regularly interact with sales and trading desk personnel in connection with their research, including to ascertain pricing and liquidity in the
fixed income markets.

Other Important Disclosures

Prices are indicative and for information purposes only. Except as otherwise stated in the report, for the purpose of any recommendation in relation to: (i) an equity security, the price
referenced is the publicly traded price of the security as of close of business on the day prior to the date of the report or, if the report is published during intraday trading, the price referenced is
indicative of the traded price as of the date and time of the report; or (ii) a debt security (including equity preferred and CDS), prices are indicative as of the date and time of the report and are
from various sources including Bank of America Merrill Lynch trading desks.
The date and time of completion of the production of any recommendation in this report shall be the date and time of dissemination of this report as recorded in the report timestamp.

This report may refer to fixed income securities that may not be offered or sold in one or more states or jurisdictions. Readers of this report are advised that any discussion, recommendation or
other mention of such securities is not a solicitation or offer to transact in such securities. Investors should contact their BofA Merrill Lynch representative or Merrill Lynch Financial Global
Wealth Management financial advisor for information relating to fixed income securities
Rule 144A securities may be offered or sold only to persons in the US. who are Qualified Institutional Buyers within the meaning of Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
ECURITIES DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY BE RATED BELOW INVESTMENT GRADE AND SHOULD THEREFORE ONLY BE CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN ACCOUNTS QUALIFIED FOR SPECULATIVE
INVESTMENT.
Recipients who are not institutional investors or market professionals should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor before considering information in this report in connection
with any investment decision, or for a necessary explanation of its contents.
The securities discussed in this report may be traded over-the-counter. Retail sales and/or distribution of this report may be made only in states where these securities are exempt from
registration or have been qualified for sale.

Officers of MLPF&S or one or more of its affiliates (other than research analysts) may have a financial interest in securities of the issuer(s) or in related investments.

This report, and the securities discussed herein, may not be eligible for distribution or sale in all countries or to certain categories of investors.

BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.

""BofA Merrill Lynch"" includes Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (‘MLPF&S’) and its affiliates. Investors should contact their BofA Merrill Lynch representative or
Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management financial advisor if they have questions concerning this report. ""BofA Merrill Lynch"" and ""Merrill Lynch"" are each global brands for BofA
Merrill Lynch Global Research.
Information relating to Non-US affiliates of BofA Merrill Lynch and Distribution of Affiliate Research Reports:

LPF&S distributes, or may in the future distribute, research reports of the following non-US affiliates in the US (short name: legal name, regulator): Merrill Lynch (South Africa): Merrill Lynch
South Africa (Pty) Ltd., regulated by The Financial Service Board; MLI (UK): Merrill Lynch International, regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority
PRA); Merrill Lynch (Australia): Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited, regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission; Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong): Merrill Lynch (Asia
Pacific) Limited, regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (HKSFC); Merrill Lynch (Singapore): Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd, regulated by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore (MAS); Merrill Lynch (Canada): Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, regulated by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada; Merrill Lynch (Mexico): Merrill Lynch Mexico, SA de
CV, Casa de Bolsa, regulated by the Comisidn Nacional Bancaria y de Valores; Merrill Lynch (Argentina): Merrill Lynch Argentina SA, regulated by Comisién Nacional de Valores; Merrill Lynch
japan): Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co., Ltd., regulated by the Financial Services Agency; Merrill Lynch (Seoul): Merrill Lynch International Incorporated (Seoul Branch) regulated by the
Financial Supervisory Service; Merrill Lynch (Taiwan): Merrill Lynch Securities (Taiwan) Ltd., regulated by the Securities and Futures Bureau; DSP Merrill Lynch (India): DSP Merrill Lynch Limited,
regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India; PT Merrill Lynch (Indonesia): PT Merrill Lynch Indonesia, regulated by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (O)K); Merrill Lynch (Israel): Merrill Lynch
srael Limited, regulated by Israel Securities Authority; Merrill Lynch (Russia): O00 Merrill Lynch Securities, Moscow, regulated by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation; Merrill Lynch
DIFC}: Merrill Lynch International (DIFC Branch}, regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA); Merrill Lynch (Spain): Merrill Lynch Capital Markets Espana, S.AS.V., regulated by
Comisién Nacional del Mercado De Valores; Merrill Lynch (Brazil): Bank of America Merrill Lynch Banco Multiplo S.A., regulated by Comissdo de Valores Mobiliarios; Merrill Lynch KSA Company,
errill Lynch Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Company, regulated by the Capital Market Authority.
This research report: has been approved for publication and is distributed in the United Kingdom (UK) to professional clients and eligible counterparties (as each is defined in the rules of the
FCA and the PRA) by MLI (UK) and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, which are authorized by the PRA and regulated by the FCA and the PRA, and is distributed in the UK to
retail clients (as defined in the rules of the FCA and the PRA) by Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited, London Branch, which is authorized by the Central Bank of Ireland and subject to
imited regulation by the FCA and PRA - details about the extent of our regulation by the FCA and PRA are available from us on request; has been considered and distributed in Japan by Merrill
Lynch (Japan), a registered securities dealer under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in Japan; is issued and distributed in Hong Kong by Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong) which is regulated
by HKSFC (research reports containing any information in relation to, or advice on, futures contracts are not intended for issuance or distribution in Hong Kong and are not directed to, or
intended for issuance or distribution to, or use by, any person in Hong Kong): is issued and distributed in Taiwan by Merrill Lynch (Taiwan); is issued and distributed in India by DSP Merrill Lynch
India); and is issued and distributed in Singapore to institutional investors and/or accredited investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations) by Merrill Lynch International
Bank Limited (Merchant Bank} (MLIBLMB) and Merrill Lynch (Singapore) (Company Registration Nos F 06872E and 198602883D respectively). MLIBLMB and Merrill Lynch (Singapore} are
regulated by MAS. Bank of America N.A, Australian Branch (ARBN 064 874 531), AFS License 412901 (BANA Australia) and Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited (ABN 65 006 276 795), AFS
License 235132 (MLEA) distribute this report in Australia only to ‘Wholesale’ clients as defined by s.761G of the Corporations Act 2001. With the exception of BANA Australia, neither MLEA nor
any of its affiliates involved in preparing this research report is an Authorised Deposit- Taking Institution under the Banking Act 1959 nor regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation
Authority. No approval is required for publication or distribution of this report in Brazil and its local distribution is by Merrill Lynch (Brazil) in accordance with applicable regulations. Merrill Lynch
DIF is authorized and regulated by the DFSA. Research reports prepared and issued by Merrill Lynch (DIFC) are done so in accordance with the requirements of the DFSA conduct of business
rules. Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, Frankfurt Branch (BAMLI Frankfurt) distributes this report in Germany and is regulated by BaFin.
This research report has been prepared and issued by MLPF&S and/or one or more of its non-US affiliates. MLPF&S is the distributor of this research report in the US and accepts fu
responsibility for research reports of its non-US affiliates distributed to MLPF&S clients in the US. Any US person receiving this research report and wishing to effect any transaction in any
security discussed in the report should do so through MLPF&S and not such foreign affiliates. Hong Kong recipients of this research report should contact Merrill Lynch (Asia Pacific) Limited in
respect of any matters relating to dealing in securities (and not futures contracts} or provision of specific advice on securities (and not futures contracts). Singapore recipients of this research
report should contact Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited (Merchant Bank) and/or Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this
research report.

General Investment Related Disclosures:
Taiwan Readers: Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or a solicitation of an offer to transact in any securities or other financial instrument. No part of
this report may be used or reproduced or quoted in any manner whatsoever in Taiwan by the press or any other person without the express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch.

w

jes Bankof America
6 Liquid Insight | 22 September 2016 Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010614
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985.txt,"From: Deepak Chopra | _=————ns

Sent: 8/8/2016 8:57:31 AM
To: Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: America's Shadow: The Real Secret of Donald J. Trump - SFGate by Deepak Chopra

Attachments: supergenes[2].png

Importance: — High

Since Woody was into the subconscious mind | thought I’d share this
See you at 3PM
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/America-s-Shadow-The-Real-Secret-of-Donald-J-7965248.ph

Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009

The Chopra Foundation

OEEPAK CHOPRA, 4.0
RUDOLPH E TANZI, PHO

SURER

GENES

Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNA for Optimum Health and Wellbeing

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028985
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029443.txt,"TAX BULLETIN 2018-1: TAX REFORM SIGNED INTO LAW

next $100,000 of taxable income for married filing jointly ($50,000 for others). The following is a simple example

for a pass-through entity.

EXAMPLE

H and W file a joint return on which they report taxable income of $200,000 (determined without regard

to this provision). H has a sole proprietorship that is a qualified business and is a “specified service
business.” W is an employee and receives only W-2 wages from her job.

H’s qualified business income is $150,000. 20 percent of the qualified business income is $30,000.
Because H and W’s taxable income is below the $315,000 threshold amount for a joint return, (i) the wage

limit does not apply to H’s qualified business, and (ii) the limitation applicable to specified service

businesses does not apply. H’s deductible amount for qualified business income is $30,000.

On their joint return, H & W would qualify for a $30,000 deduction, reducing their taxable income from
$200,000 to $170,000. That taxable income would then be subject to regular income rates.

While upper-income wage earners in high-tax states generally do not fare well under the Act, taxpayers with

substantial income from pass-through businesses should see a tax benefit compared with current law, since the

weighted average rate of business income would be approximately 30%. Capital gains, dividends, and other

preferential income from a business would not be considered “business income” and would continue to be taxed

at preferential tax rates.

Under the initial Senate version, the pass-through deduction was not available to trusts or estates. Under the Act,
however, trusts and estates can benefit from the pass-through deduction.

CORPORATE INTERNATIONAL TAXES

2017 Law

2018 Law

Worldwide with deferral available
International Corporate
Tax — Scope

100% of foreign-source portion of dividends
paid by foreign corporation to U.S. corporate
shareholder (that owns at least 10%) would
be exempt from U.S. taxation

No

One-Time Deemed
Repatriation of Foreign
Earnings

U.S. shareholders owning at least 10% of a
foreign corporation would be taxed on post-
1986 net foreign earnings and profits (15.5%
on earnings and profits comprising cash or
cash equivalents; 8% on remaining earnings
and profits); may elect to pay tax over a
period of up to 8 years, in annual installments
that allow more to be paid at the back end

OTHER PROVISIONS

The Act has other provisions of note that are not included in the charts above.

e Roth recharacterization no longer allowed. Under 2017 law, if you converted a traditional IRA to a
Roth IRA, you could “recharacterize” that conversion within certain time limits, in effect undoing it.

For tax years beginning after 2017, the Act repeals this rule, meaning you can no longer recharacterize

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029443
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030112.txt,"communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030112
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012003.txt,"9716/14

V3GR

Vermont Bence Conver
73 Lawer Welden Stree:
&. Abans, VF 5479-000) 1

BH: @.1 Non-doemagrent Vian Frirteen an bea! of Jean Lue Brun) :
h
Deer Ge of Modam. |

t enw Que Wier m strong support af Mr Jean Luc Brenela applicofcs 7 a mon

as tp Chee country, | am currently working os an Ageet et Two Munagerme im
Loe Angeles Based upen my standing im the faid of tic fashion industry | am equens:
cabed tc evaluate the credenualy of olber profreucnals om the field | hove been Ghee be
review the prafemecnal credentials of Mir. Jean lag Beane! It we oy peefedcicnel opmien.
based upon my persenel end profeaminonal kncwieige of Mr. Brincis talents, thar tr
Bravel u an art director of extrvordinary abihty eho ranks ameng the mal pArcentar? of
foreign preécesinna!s 31 wry top of hus bel.

3 greatly: admire Joan tue Brunet and ted 0 oa picasum f work win etic ao inlepied
Petia. Judang ty the high promie guecraa of she compearues with whieh he regulate
@roviea, chearty | am mot the nly om eho apprecigtes hie talant. Hie models! hese appeal ad
to bay ol the waeNe's saat pujzutar publicetiann, reaching bteraly mélioce 4! edinvers He
ts perticulerk: fumous for brs eerk i jechicn, advertining and educce! sorkl He
contrutiog to major chen, mich s¢ Galvle Kien, Genel, Christian Dot have aecured
him @ godtien as one of the leedmg ict iastuon art derectore working tddsy. Jean Lu;
Brunet is the consummate profeseqanel when tf comes bo the at of faahion god his work
efi: fiapieyed in worlds most eitte miagmemern A true arte. he mm cummiiied ta the
@ntielection of the chant on every gocasion. Although Mr Grune) covnmeneds the Regret
@aeapeentem for hee werk. be ta well worth Lhe cost.

Mr Jean Lut Grand Oo uoquesisunetty an cviividual of extnsondhnary trent, enerpy,
intereadional echwewsreent and ockraviedemcnt. hhould you Rees any questions iegerdhiag
My. fewnels extracrdmars atnlity, plemee (ccl free to contact me

Thenk you for your sthenuen ang conmderanen.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012003
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026683.txt,"Liquidity sovereigns

Liquidity sovereigns manage assets to stimulate
economies that are highly dependent on commodity
prices during a market shock. Due to the unpredictable
and sudden nature of outflows, liquidity sovereigns
have extremely short time horizons and prioritise
portfolio liquidity above investment returns. Despite
low yields of government bonds, liquidity sovereigns
are unable to seek higher returns from alternative
asset classes due to the inherent liquidity risk.

Development sovereigns

The asset and geographic allocation of development
sovereigns is driven by the requirement to encourage
local economic growth (rather than investment
return). Development sovereigns take large (often
controlling) stakes in companies of economic
significance in order to grow their presence in

the local market. While other sovereigns adjust
allocations to maximise their asset growth and yield,
development sovereigns consider their success

in economic metrics such as GDP growth and job
creation, working closely with their investments to
grow long-term strategic assets. This means that
development funds are relatively unreactive to
return shortfalls and asset allocation trends.

Central banks

Central banks are ‘lenders of last resort’ - managers
of a large foreign reserves portfolio to bail out
financial institutions of public importance. Due to

the importance of maintaining reserves to sufficiently
cover such requirements, preservation of capital

is of greatest importance. Central banks also have
high levels of public accountability and disclosure,
encouraging risk aversion through short time horizons
and highly liquid investments. While other sovereigns
invest in home market assets, central bank reserve
managers hold the majority of their assets in foreign
securities, increasing the importance of currency
exposure relative to other sovereigns.

Unlike sovereign investors, central banks have
objectives outside of reserves management, including
local market liquidity management and maintenance
of currency pegs. Since these external factors have
influence over the foreign reserves, in this study we
consider central banks separately from sovereign
investors. However, as many government bonds have
negative yields, certain central banks have looked to
invest in non-traditional asset classes (e.g. equities)
to preserve their capital, closer aligning their foreign
reserves investment strategy to that of sovereign
wealth funds.

Funding challenges
and the low return
environment have
unique implications
for each sovereign
segment.

Investment & liquidity

Liquidity sovereigns

(ale)

(DEV)

Investment & development

Development sovereigns

Capital p

Central banks!
(CB)

03

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026683

"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022957.txt,"effectively hawking his secret sauce algorithm) and invest up to $5 million
with each. (Epstein’s advantage here, over traditional investment firms, is
that he was proposing to do this without needing to own the algorithm itself,
the manner in which many firms operate to the disadvantage of the quants.) I
knew paltry little about this and so rather found myself identifying with the
young women to whom Epstein was explaining the basic math and
mechanics. (Epstein demands a certain amount of pedagogical attention in
return for a wealth of information.)

Hefnerian prurience becomes quite businesslike: poised young women
in a mansion on the Upper East Side with various office responsibilities—
really not that different from any of the art galleries in the surrounding
neighborhood.

The Epstein house/office is, not unlike many nearby galleries, an
ultimate club, a private reserve, a place of shared and valuable
information—indeed, the kind of place, that, even for the most ardent
conspiracists, might seem a little too movie-like. And while it’s hard to
explain why, given the radio-active nature of Epstein’s disgrace, the rich and
powerful still beat a path to his door, it’s also notable in the fixed hierarchy
of who comes to whose turf, that everybody, when they went to see Epstein,
comes to him.

A week in late September, U.N. week as it happened, began, on
Sunday, at Epstein’s house with a colloquial for billionaires—Gates, TK,
TK, TK.

Epstein, preternaturally responsive to both the price of oil and to the
politics of the middle of East, entertained that evening a delegation from
Qatar, including Sheikh Hamad, the foreign minister. Hamad, indeed, lives
across the street in a similarly furnished house—he and Epstein have the
same decorator. Epstein, in his relaxed and amused demeanor, kept
prodding: “Why are you financing the bad guys? What do you get out of
that?”

The Qatarians, in some mild diplomatic discomfort, seemed most
worried that their bid for the World Cup might be compromised by bribery
allegations.

At 9:00 next morning, Epstein is joined for breakfast in the dining
room by Reid Weingarten, who’s represented among other fat cats in
trouble, Worldcom’s Bernie Ebbers and Goldman Sach’s Lloyd Blankfein.
Weingarten, horse, with a cold, and dejected, is just back from a failed
defense of former Connecticut Governor John Rowland. (Epstein: “You
actually believe he was getting fucked?” Weingarten: “From minute one.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022957
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021817.txt,"please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021817
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023491.txt,"Article 2.

World Affairs
Yes, Nukes: The Global Zero Utopia

Richard Perle

March/April 2011 -- There are many specters haunting our world, but
one is of our own making—the utopian vision of a world free of
nuclear weapons, the dream that has come to be called “global zero.”
The vision of the total elimination of nuclear weapons is a
postmodern version of an old idea, popular early in the twentieth
century, when Norman Angell’s The Great Illusion (reprinted in
1933) was required reading in intellectual and policy circles in the
United States and Europe. Seventy-six years before Barack Obama
was honored in Oslo, Norman Angell also won the Nobel Prize,
having come to prominence with the argument that global economic
interdependence rendered war futile and unprofitable and therefore
obsolete.

In the wake of the Bush administration, what lies in store for the
future of America's presence abroad?

Angell’s theory expressed the war-weary and wishful temper of the
time. Enthusiasm for achieving peace through international
institutions and legal constructs ran high in the period after the
disastrous First World War, its most fulsome expression being the
Kellogg-Briand Pact, named for its authors, an American secretary of
state and a French foreign minister. Ratified by parliaments around
the world (and by the US Senate on an 85-1 vote, with only
Wisconsin Republican John J. Blaine voting against), the pact sought
to deal with the problem of international aggression by simply
outlawing war. Less than two years after the pact entered into force in
1929, one of the signatories, Japan, invaded Manchuria. The world
“community’—that is, the rest of the treaty parties—did nothing.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023491
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692.txt,"From: John Page

To:

Subject: Re: Russian House

Date: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:23:18 PM
Mayor:

Happy to help. The address is 515 N. County Road.

JP

im |
;.: iis
Date: 05/04/2009 04:28 PM
Subject: Russian House

JP: What is the address of the former Trump mansion on North Ocean purchased by the Russian?

MM

Remember Mom this Mother's Day! Find a florist near you now.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016692
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031645.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031645
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016679.txt,"ul

Drinking Water Quality Evaluation:
Analysis of the City of West Palm Beach’s
Potable Water Product Delivered to
The Town of Palm Beach

HSA Project No. 803-0319

Prepared for:

Town of Palm Beach
Public Works Department
951 Old Okeechobee Rd., Suite D
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Prepared by:

HSA Engineers & Scientists
1486-A Skees Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33411

January 2009

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016679
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022764.txt,"Indeed, Roberts, with the Daily Mail being her prime outlet, emerges
as the most vocal accuser—and, in fact, the some total of the current story
and attention.

That is, there is no story without her and what is being billed as her
memoir of her “sex slavery” with Epstein, written ten years after the fact.
Along with the Dershowitz and Prince Andrew charges, Roberts puts, with
rather some narrative detail, both Clinton and Al and Tipper Gore on the
island—and in fact Clinton, apparently with the acquiescence of the Secret
Service, flying in a helicopter piloted by Epstein’s girlfriend, an amateur
pilot. Epstein’s lawyers say that not only have Clinton and the Gores never
been to the Epstein Island, but that there is easy proof of this in secret
service records, which would seem to make the memoir opportunistic or
hallucinatory fiction.

The FBI, in a recent filing, has argued that Roberts should not be
party to the suit against the government because she refused to cooperate
with the government in its investigation in 2007, hence has no standing as a
victim. (At the same time, the FBI included her on the list of 40 victims with
whom it mandated Epstein reach a settlement.)

It is hard to find a more hyperbolic intersection of media and lawyers
then in Epstein’s case.

Edwards, over the six years of his law suit, tries to depose Clinton,
Donald Trump, and Dershowitz—almost all of his targets coming directly
from the original Vanity Fair and New York Magazine articles about
Epstein.

In addition to Prince Andrew as a British hot button, first connected to
Epstein through Roberts’ interview with the Daily Mail in 2010, Clinton
takes on a new role as Hillary spoiler through his connection, real or
imagined, to Epstein and sex slaves.

Almost everybody identified in any story about Epstein is approached
by other media seeking to write about Epstein, often with financial
incentives.

No new stories or even new details emerge. Every aspect of the
current story is based on court filings describing events that may or may not
have taken place prior to 2007. It’s as though a kind of ground-hog day of
moral opprobrium, a desire to repeat and to savor a new the old details.

A recent Reuters story identified a charity that Epstein has not given
money to in 15 years that said if he does give again, they would give it back.

The world cleanly divides, with Epstein (and friends) behind secure
walls and the Mail and social media and upholders of new norms ever more

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022764
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027576.txt,"Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2019-02-13\ xy
WMS on 2019-02-04 at 08.06.46. ichat

Service: iMessag

Start Time: 02/04/19 05:06:46 AM (570978406)

End Time: 02/13/19 01:16:24 PM (571785384)

Last Message ID: 25040

Chat Room:

Participants: .- ETT TT

Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com,

Messages -

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/04/19 05:06:46 AM (570978406)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 89033242-B430-4747-8776-6518F5776C17

Message: The last thing you want , is for him to take an interest in you. . right
now it is only

Time: 02/04/19 09:18:12 AM (570993492)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7CD2387F-4C49-4CBE-AD49-2D8C13F8438E

Message: Hey got a cool Paper published today

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 02/04/19 09:19:07 AM (570993547)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 571322F3-4AA3-4D5D-AC85-A732ECB543A

|

Message: ?

Time: 02/04/19 09:25:42 AM (570993942)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 4CD5D194-82C6-47D8-8AB9-8681E2CD3B14

Message: I started a small clot bank here at the UW to store all clots we removed from

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027576
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021624.txt,"‘ * |
FD-515 (Rev. 12-19-06) ®@ Accomplishment Report ° Date Prepared 29/0 S

Squad supervisor approval (Accomplishment must be reported and loaded into Date Loaded 20/ O¢
(please initial) ISRAA within 30 days from date of accomplishment) Date Loaders Initials

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

File Number 1. Used, but did not help 3. Helped, substantially
— PPIy, 5 S/E-MMn—[ow Oez| 2. Helped, minimally 4, Absolutely eesenial
— al For Sub. Invest. Assist. by other FO(s) indicate A, B, C, D for corresponding FO
Banieuptey Fraud ol | Rate FO aT Rata FO IAT Rate FO \AT Rata FO 1aT b6
Computer Fraud/Abuse | Fin anaiyst | bab riettsun |] [uco-narpack{ | b7C
Corruption of Public Offctal BR Aicconasst | | [Penensore | —_ fli oaver ican] | aE
[Consen won. | [I Potyoraph | ME crisis Neg. Fed] |
RA Squad]
AFOOT | PRCA Re fevsuririsc || [search Warant| Mss top-Locl| |
LEED Pause tu | A Siow vonoy | JMenracs, |_|

a Butte - ITC

Sav - ITC
Poc- ITC

Ft. Mon. - ITC

lee
Td

Eng. Tape Ex. | | swat Team |_|
Teh. ates |_|
[ Evid. Purchaso| IE Phone Tou Reo| |
[isb. bw. xem] | [uco-Groupi]

J. Civil Rico Matters Date:
Also complete “Section G""

Other Civil Matters Date:

F. Conviction
(Federal ([JLocalt [7] Intemational
Conviction Date:

A. Complaint / Information/ indictment

(JFederat [Local {J International
Complaint Date;

Check If Civil Rico Complaint 1 Subject Description Code *(—_)* Judgment ——._——_—__.___*
Judicial Outcome —*%
Information Date: For 6F, G, H-Include Agency Code Amount $
Indictment Date: 5 Petty or 5 aad Suspension: Years Months__
Plea or ria
B, Locate / Arrest State: Judicial District: K. Administrative Sanction Date:

Subject Description Code .
Type: Length:

(Federal [JLocal [[] International :
Subject Priority, OA 4B Oc

G, U.S. Code Violation

Required for sections A, B, F and J Suspension [] Permanent
Locate Date: (Federal Only) A Debarment or
Arrest Date: Title Section # Counts Injunction Year. Months.

(1 Subject Resisted Arrest
(3 Subject Arrested was Armed

L. Asset Seizure Date:.
Asset Forfaiture Date:
CATS # Mandatory
Circle below one of the three asset forfeiture:

Admin, Civil Judicial, or Criminal

oO

. Summons Date:
(Federal [j Locat

. Recovery / Restitution / PELP X
(Federal [Local [1 international
Recovery Date:

Code * v Amount $
Code*__syv = Amount §

Restitution Date:

Do not indicate $ value in Section D

H, Sentence Date: -
M. Acquittal/ Dismissal/ Pretrial Diversion

Sentence Type: *

(Circle one) Date:

Months____
Months.

In Jail: Years,

Suspended: Years

N. Drug Seizures V Date:

(Court Ordered [[] Pretrial Diversion Probation: Years Months___ Drug Code *
Code * ¥ Amount $ Fines: $ <a Code
PELP Date: é Do nat indicate $ in Section D
Code * v Amount $ |. Disruptlon/Dismantlement: Vv

E. Hostages(s) Released Date:,

Disruption Date:

Released by: [1] Terrorist [[] Other

O. Child Victim Information
Child located / identified Date: oof opray

PRuiving _ [Deceased

Dismantlement Date:

Number of Hostages:
Completion of FD-515a Side 2 Mandatory

P, Subject Information - Required for ail blocks excluding block D (Recovery/PELP), blocks E, 1, Land N b6
| | | Race* | Sex | Date of Birth Social Security No. (if available) b7c

oO Subject related to an LCN, Asian Organized Crime (AOC), italian Organized Crime (!0C), Russian/Easlern European, Caribbean, or Nigerian Organized Came Group +
Complete FD-515a, Side 1 Blocks A-E mandatory, F-H as appropriate,

oO Subject related to an OC/Drug organizalion, a VCMO Program National Gang Strategy target group, or a VCMO Program Nalional Priority Initiative target group -
Complata FD-515a, Side 1 Blocks A-C only.

x Additional information may be added by attaching another form or a plain sheet of paper for additional entries,

Serial No. of FD-515
e See codes on reverse side. [|

Y Requires that an explanation be attached and loaded into ISRAA for recovery over $1 m and PELP over $5 m, disruption, dismantlement, and drug seizures.

O/E-MW - '!98062- 2o2

~ HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021624

"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033201.txt,"From: Alireza Ittihadich

Sent: 12/5/2016 6:44:28 PM
To: JEFF EPSTEIN [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Trump

Attachments: IMG_0419.JPG

Importance: — High

Lor

: <F
Ms

i

ong

ow,

~

4th

.
*

V-BR
Alireza ITTIHADIEH

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033201
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015176.txt,"hit the fan now.” That phrase, incidentally, did not come into the
language until after there was electricity. People say that they are not
referring to a lovely Japanese lithograph showing a kimono-clad woman
whose long shiny black hair is twisted up into a bun, and who is
coquettishly providing her own personal breeze with a colorful rice-paper
fan. Then sp/at/-right in her porcelain-like face. So, no, it has to be an
electric fan, which revolves so fast it protects you from the shit—or spreads
it, depending which side you’ re on—or what’ sa fan fo/?

Meanwhile, even as all that shit is hitting all those fans, the laxative
industry continues to blossom. New brand names are constantly
competing in the open marketplace. Ex-Lax has even come out with a

“milder” version for women—certainly an indication of rampant male
chauvinism in their Research & Development section. What' s_ the
implication of this trend? Do females have different digestive systems than
males? Is it perfectly acceptable for macho men to have chocolate-covered
sandpaper coursing through their intestinal tracts?

And yet credit must also be given to those friendly folks at Ex-Lax.
They were the very first sponsor on television to include a sign-language
translation of a commercial—a long-overdue service for the constipated

hearing-impaired. Indeed, this had been an early demand of the Deaf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015176
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026668.txt,"BOOTHBAY

FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC

February 16, 2017

In the fourth quarter of 2016, Boothbay Absolute Return Strategies, LP (the “Fund”) earned a net return of
approximately +0.04%.'”

Sharpe Sortino

October N ber D b 2016 ITD
ctober November December ITD* ITD«

Boothbay Absolute Return — 9 40, 9.05% (0.23% 3.84% 16.09% 2.25 637

Strategies, L.P

S&P 500 -1.94% 3.42% 1.82% 9.54% 14.21% 0.51 0.93
HFRX : Equity Market Neutral -0.13%  -0.04%  -1.07% -5.08% 2.51% 0.23 0.48
HFRX : Absolute Return 0.39% -0.16% 0.20% 0.31% 2.13% 0.36 0.98
HFRX : Global Hedge Fund -0.57% 0.87% 0.86% 2.50% -3.50% -0.42 -0.43

* For Sharpe/Sortino Ratio calculations, 1-Month LIBOR is set as the risk free rate.

Since the Fund opened on July 1, 2014, it has returned 16.10%.'” In that period, the Fund’s largest month-
to-month drawdown has been -1.4%, versus -8.9% for the S&P 500, -1.5% for the HFRX Absolute Return
Index, -8.9% for the HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index and -5.3% for the HFRX Market Neutral Index.

Performance and Commentary

We ended 2016 with a slightly positive quarter, bringing net performance for the year to +3.84%. Consistent
with the trend seen earlier in the year, 2016 has been described by investors and financial media as among
the worst years for multi-manager multi-strategy firms, on both an absolute and risk-adjusted return basis.
While we consider earning +3.84% to be disappointing for our strategy on an absolute return basis, doing so
with a maximum drawdown of 1.4%, and in what was a challenging environment for low-net exposure
relative value strategies, leaves us viewing 2016 as a “good” bad year.

For a second consecutive year, the Fund generated positive net returns overall on the days when the S&P
500 Index was negative. The S&P had 121 losing days in 2016 (producing losses of over -66% in total)’ and
on those days, we were positive approximately 55% of the time, and generated almost half of our total net
returns for the year. Given that we aim to be a protector of capital in markets that most managers will lose
capital, this sampling is especially gratifying. As we look forward, we remain as encouraged as ever that our
combination of unique “niche” strategies and strategies with structural edge, alongside our allocations to
low-beta alpha-generating stock pickers and quantitative portfolio managers, will deliver strong risk-
adjusted returns over various market cycles.

Before going into the performance attribution for Q4 and 2016 overall, we want to re-visit a topic discussed
in our Q1 2016 letter related to hedge fund crowding, which investors have continued to ask us about the
past several months. The question raised is typically some variation of the following: Given that Boothbay
allocates to low-net equity focused managers, who may have similar strategies to those that comprise other
multi-manager platforms, why has Boothbay been less-exposed to deleveraging and hedge fund crowding

' Assumes Boothbay Absolute Return Strategies, LP, Onshore Accelerator Share Class 1A (2-year lock and 14% incentive allocation).

* Performance figures reported herein are shown unaudited, net of fees/allocations and expenses; include the reinvestment of dividends, capital gains,
and other earnings; and may be subject to adjustment.

> S&P 500 negative-return analysis calculated using Bloomberg closing prices for SPX Index.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026668
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024315.txt,"Table of Contents

The Compensation and Nominating Committee will consider stockholder nominations for membership on the Board. For the 2020 Annual
Meeting, nominations may be submitted to Carvana Co., 1930 W. Rio Salado Pkwy, Tempe, AZ 85281, Attn: Secretary, who will forward them to the
Chairman of the Compensation and Nominating Committee. Recommendations must be in writing and we must receive the recommendation no later than
the close of business on January 24, 2020, and not earlier than the close of business on December 25, 2019. Recommendations must also include certain
other requirements specified in our bylaws. The committee will apply the same criteria to the evaluation of those candidates as it applies to other director
candidates.

When filling a vacancy on the Board, the Compensation and Nominating Committee identifies the desired skills and experience of a new
director and nominates individuals who it believes can strengthen the Board’s capabilities and further diversify the collective experience represented by the
then-current directors. The Compensation and Nominating Committee may engage third parties to assist in the search and provide recommendations.
Pursuant to a previously informal policy formally adopted in 2019, any search firm that the committee engages is requested to include women and minority
candidates in the initial list from which the committee selects director candidates. Also, directors are generally asked to recommend candidates for the
position. The candidates would be evaluated based on the process outlined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Compensation and Nominating
Committee charter, and the same process would be used for all candidates, including candidates recommended by stockholders.

-7-

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024315
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017567.txt,"JOSHUA WURMAN

I grew up in Pennsylvania, bereft of any really meaningful
opportunities to experience severe weather, hurricanes, even
real deep snow. As a youth, I tried to impress friends and
girls with my home weather station and insect collection.
These efforts, among other factors, kept me well out of the
running for homecoming king. Naturally, I moved on toa
party school, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
to search for a better social life. But hating schoolwork, I
rushed through it, earning my MS at only 21. Then after some
aimless additional years in school I dropped out for three
years, working for the Air Force on nuclear winter computer
simulations and other cheery subjects. Returning to MIT,
Iearned my Doctorate and moved to Colorado to work at

the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) on
bistatic radar networks, a new type of weather radar system
that I had invented. However, after seeing real High Plains
thunderstorms close up, and tornadoes, I got distracted

and conceived of building a network of big, fast scanning
radars that could drive right up to tornadoes and fires, inside
hurricanes, and into other nice weather. The DOW program
was born, and I moved down to Oklahoma to be a professor
for a few years, chase tornadoes and hurricanes, file patents,
teach and write papers. In the middle of this, I traveled to Asia

on a research project and met my wife operating a weather
radar on an island off the coast of Hong Kong and conned
her into believing that Oklahoma was just like Hong Kong.
After receiving tenure and the implied lifetime sentence

at the university, I did the sensible thing: I quit and moved
back to Boulder and founded my own non-profit research
institution, the Center for Severe Weather Research (CSWR).
My wife and Irun CSWR, manage the DOWs as National
Science Foundation (NSF) Facilities, and conduct research
programs such as the VORTEX2 study and hurricane studies.
We have four young children who, so far, show no unhealthy
obsessive interests in tornadoes, hurricanes or radars. I’ve just
finished the VORTEX2 tornado study (http://vortex2.org),
which is the largest tornado research mission ever, funded
mostly by NSF, employing about 120 scientists and crew in
50 vehicles. We had 11 radars, 4 balloon trucks, UAVs, 40
deployable instruments, 13 mobile mesonets, photogrammetry
and microphysics teams, damage survey teams, basically
more of anything that used to study tornadoes scientifically.
Just imagine the lines for fuel and bathrooms in small-

town gas stations. During WWW, I'll be keeping a nervous
eye out for any hurricanes threatening to make landfall.

If a hurricane looms, I'll be leading my team into the eye.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017567
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031876.txt,"1

Amon 2
a 5 aN

The

Presidential News Bulletin

14 June, 2011
Aticle ™-’ The Washington Post
From a Saudi prince, tough talk on America’s
favoritism toward Israel
Richard Cohen
Boston Globe
Turkey’s new challenges
Stephen Kinzer
The Financial Times
Why Syria will get away with it
Gideon Rachman
The American Interest
The Conservative Revolutionary
Walter Russell Mead
Article 5. NYT
Iran Without Nukes
Roger Cohen
Anicle ®. | NATIONAL REVIEW
Interview with - Francis Fukuyama
Matthew Shaffer
Project Syndicate
Does Anything Matter?
Peter Singer

Article 2.

Article 3.

Article 4.

Article 7.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031876
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025728.txt,"Time: 08/23/18 12:40:06 PM

Flags: 1085445

Ts Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 95DA15B9-8430-4FB9-80C2-F4B861168B7D

Message: Have you decided on time and place.

(556746006)

Time: 08/23/18 01:04:27 PM

Flags: 112

6401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

(556747467)

GUID: C1IC3AE71-1CD3-4FEB-92C4-F5D8D7985A33

Message: No

Time: 08/23/18 01:04:41 PM

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2341C6A9-9F51-43AD- 981

Message: Here with WSJ guys screening film

(556747481)

Time: 08/23/18 01:04:52 PM

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: BC44]

E176-Al142-4BCD-B

(556747492)

ED3-47D81B7A

t coming to city now until Monday

ES-1FA4DCO9FEF3

a5

E666

Message: Can I send u a link to watch

Time: 08/23/18 01:04:59 PM

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AOIE

9F80-33BE-4D6F-9630-7CO1LDS5055B3F

T

(556747499)

Message: Trump@War

Sendért e273

Time: 08/23/18 01:05:15 PM

Flags: 1085445

itunes@gmail.com

(556747515)

? Ill get food for us if its 66 st

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025728
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221.txt,"From: Barry J. Cohen Ps

Sent: 10/2/2017 9:17:38 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: Plane management

Importance: — High

On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In
part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM

To: Barry J. Cohen <i i>

Subject: Re: Plane management

did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Barry J. Cohen F =—Sti(i‘CSéizS wrote:

Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. | recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but
haven’t heard back from him. | think | talked him out of automating the divans. | agreed with what you said about
that.

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM

To: Barry J. Cohen <x >

Subject: Re: Plane management

isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Barry J. Cohen- <n wrote:

Ah yes.

From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM

To: Barry J. Cohen <a

Subject: Re: Plane management

new depreciation rules proposed under trump

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Barry J. Cohen hii. wrote:

GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?

On depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can’t use
bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.

Are you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure | follow that.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026221
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010827.txt,"64:19:15

01:49:18

O119:24

01:19:24

04:19:27

04:49:30

04:19:94

On ON & WH =

01:19:36
oieaa «9
orga: 10
ortoas 14
ortoss 12
orgs: 13
ortess 14
04:19:55 15
ososa 16
012002 17
or204 18
ot2005 19
or2007 20
or2008 21
orzo10 22
04:20:15 23
ov2017 24
or2019 25

01:20:22
04:20:26
04:20:28
04:20:31
01:20:34
01:20:39

04:20:42

OnN Oak WN =

01:20:45
04:20:47 9
04:20:50 10
04:20:54 11
01:20:56 12
01:20:58 13
04:21:04 14
04:21:04 15
04:21:07 1 6
On2t10 17
OF 2114 18
O27 19
04:21:19 20
0824-25 21
01:21:28 22
ON2tat 23
01:24:33 24
On24:35 25

10/20/2015 01:07:28 PM

69
other powerful persons. For example, Ghislaine Maxwell
is there with him on all of these flights and apparently
being involved in the abuse.

Indeed -- and so you -~ you have -- you
have that. You also start to see on the flight logs,
what to my mind are some very sinister things,
suggesting that the pattern is not just confined to sort
of, you know, the girls that are there in Florida, but
it -- it is extending more broadly.

Like one of the -- to my mind, sinister and
scary things on the flight logs is, we see, you know,
Virginia Roberts, who we know has been sexually abused,
and we see Jeffrey Epstein, and then we see on the
flight logs one female.

That's kind of an odd notation for a flight
log because, you know, typically, I understand the
flight logs, the purpose is, well, if something happens
with the flight, or there's some question about who was
on it, you want to know who -- who the person was who
was on the flight.

So, to my mind, when I started to see on
these flight logs entries like one female, I viewed that
as a potential device for obscuring the fact that there
was interstate trafficking of underage girls for
purposes of sexual activity. Serious federal offenses.

ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400

70

But then that evidence extended, you know,
more broadly than that. The evidence also started to
show, again, if we talk just about flight logs, that
the -- that underage girls such as Virginia Roberts were
being flown internationally from, for example, Teterboro
in New York to -- to locations, just to pick one, you
know, for example, in London, where again sexual abuse
was occurring.

And so you started to put together this
pattern of criminality that was started in this -- you
know, I don't know what the right word is here. I don’t
want to -- I don't want to -- you know, you've heard
discussions of hyperbole and things like that, but we
have got this nest of -- of -- and I won't say snakes,
but we have this nest of criminals in Florida, but it --
it seems to be spreading to Epstein's mansion in New
York; it seems to be spreading to Ghislaine Maxwell's
flat in London, and -- and -- and it goes on.

So those are the kinds of things that would
have formed the -- the -- the basis, particularly when
you -- when you start to add in this fact: What the
Palm -- going back now te Florida with the Palm Beach
Police Department. What the Palm Beach Police
Department has -- had discovered was not a one-off kind
of event, you know, on one particular day, one

ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400

64:24:37

04:21:40

04:24:42

04:21:46

O4:21:48

Ot:21:51

04:21:54

On Oa bh ON =

ot2487
orzz0 9
or2z0a 10
orz0s 14
or2z08 12
orn 13
oz 14
orzeit 15
orz21a 16
012222 17
012224 18
or2228 19
o12232 20
or2232 24
orzas 22
or2299 23
orzs1 24
or2244 25

01:22:48
0122/51
04:22:53
04:22:54
04:22:57
04:23:00

01:23:00

On Oa bh wh =

04:23:02
04:23:05 9
o12307 10
or2a10 11
O21 12
ora 13
orzaia 14
onze 15
O24 16 16
or2321 17
or2323 18
01:23:26 19
or2326 20
ovesze 21
or23:31 22
012335 23
or2sze 24
or2340 25

Page 69 to 72 of 151

71
particular girl had been sexually abused.

What the Palm Beach Police Department had
discovered was brazen, notorious, repetitive activity
sometimes occurring as often as three times ina
particular day. And so that led me to believe that the
sexual activity that was going on in Florida was such
that someone who was a regular house guest there would

have immediately come to the conclusion that, well,

look, gee, there are these underage girls coming in here

and they -- they seem to be -- you know, they don't seem
to be here to be doing, you know, business activities;
they ~- they might be here doing other kinds of
activities. So those would be the kinds of things that
would -- would have formed the factual basis.

There are other things as well, but I'm sure
you want to ask other questions in addition to that. So
I'll stop there, but those -- that's -- I think gives
you a small flavor of the kind of evidence that, you
know, was form -~ undergirding the allegations that were
being presented here.

Q. ‘It sounds like you quite passionately believe
that there was strong evidence that Mr. Epstein had
engaged in sexual misconduct; is that right?

A. I think ""strong"" understates it.

Q. In the course of that long answer, you didn't

ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400

mention Professor Dershowitz's name once.

A. I said flight logs. And let's talk about
flight logs.

Q. Let me back up. You didn’t answer his
name -- mention his name once; is that -- is that your
recollection as well?

A. That's correct. We were talking about a
factual basis, and I'll be glad -- I told you that there
were other things if you want, factual basis for -- for
Mr. Dershowitz. I'll be glad to add that in. Let me --
let's -- let me -- let me -- I would like to supplement
my answer then if I could.

Q. Do you want to look at a document?

A. Yes.

Q. Let me first -- have we exhausted your
recollection without documents of all the evidence that
you would refer to to support the allegation that
Professor Dershowitz abused other minors?

A. No.

MR. SCAROLA: And let me say that you have a
right to refer to whatever documents you choose
to refer to, to be sure that you give a complete
response to the question that has been asked, as
long as you understand that whatever you refer to
is going to be available to the other side, and
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400

18 of 38 sheets

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010827
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016801.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Paul Morris 
7/2/2019 4:24:45 PM 
jeevacation@gmail.com 
Capital Market Outlook 
Capital Market Outlook 
Chief Investment Office 
Capital Market Outlook from our Chief Investment Office 
delivers a balanced mix of macroeconomic insights and 
global market views, with in-depth analysis from the CIO's 
investment strategists and analysts. It offers timely 
commentary that can help you navigate markets and take 
advantage of emerging trends across the globe. 
This week's topics are: 
• Macro Strategy: Why 2%? — While Federal 
Reserve policy has always been focused on the goal of 
price stability, the specific meaning of price stability has 
been refined over the years from a general and non-
specified, vague concept to the current very specific 
quantitative definition of a 2% long-run average for the 
personal consumption expenditures deflator. We describe 
the evolution and rationale for the more specific target. 
• Global Market View: Global R&D: From Apollo, 
to Apple, to Alibaba? — The recent unfolding tech cold 
war between the U.S. and China will likely only accelerate 
the pace of spending on global research and development 
as the two parties vie for technological supremacy. China 
faces significant technological hurdles, while the U.S. 
needs to rethink and rebalance the role of public and 
private sector research and development spending. 
• Thought of the Week: A Golden Diversifier — 
Gold's recent outperformance versus the U.S. dollar has 
potentially triggered a bullish technical pattern. In our 
Paul Morris 
Managing Director 
Private Wealth Manager 
Merrill Private Wealth Management 
ONE BRYANT PARK 
STE 28TH FLOOR 
NEW YORK, NY 10036 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016801 
view, the market's expectation for looser monetary policy 
together with recent comments by President Trump 
implying a desire for a weaker greenback have been 
tailwinds. In addition to these drivers, we view gold as an 
appealing diversifier in light of elevated geopolitical risks. 
However, a comprehensive trade deal between the U.S. 
and China would likely constitute a more significant 
headwind for the yellow metal. 
Find out more in this edition of Capital Market Outlook, 
and feel free to contact us with any questions you have 
about our market views. 
Sincerely, 
Paul 
This material was prepared by the Chief Investment Office (CIO) and is not a publication of BofA Merrill 
Lynch Global Research. The views expressed are those of the CIO only and are subject to change. This 
information should not be construed as investment advice. It is presented for information purposes only 
and is not intended to be either a specific offer by any Merrill or Bank of America entity to sell or 
provide, or a specific invitation for a consumer to apply for, any particular retail financial product or 
service that may be available. 
Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM) is a division of Bank of America Corporation. The 
Chief Investment Office, which provides investment strategies, due diligence, portfolio construction 
guidance and wealth management solutions for GWIM clients, is part of the Investment Solutions Group 
(ISG) of GWIM. 
Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of 
future results. 
All recommendations must be considered in the context of an individual investor's goals, time horizon, 
liquidity needs and risk tolerance. Not all recommendations will be suitable for all investors. 
The risk that exchange rate fluctuations will reduce the value of returns. This arises when investments 
denominated in foreign currencies are purchased. 
Investments have varying degrees of risk. Some of the risks involved with equity securities include the 
possibility that the value of the stocks may fluctuate in response to events specific to the companies or 
markets, as well as economic, political or social events in the U.S. or abroad. Investments in foreign 
securities involve special risks, including foreign currency risk and the possibility of substantial volatility 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016802 
due to adverse political, economic or other developments. These risks are magnified for investments 
made in emerging markets. Investments in a certain industry or sector may pose additional risk due to 
lack of diversification and sector concentration. There are special risks associated with an investment in 
commodities, including market price fluctuations, regulatory changes, interest rate changes, credit risk, 
economic changes and the impact of adverse political or financial factors. 
Bank of America, Merrill, their affiliates, and advisors do not provide legal, tax, or accounting advice. 
Clients should consult their legal and/or tax advisors before making any financial decisions. 
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (also referred to as ""MLPF&S"" or ""Merrill"") makes 
available certain investment products sponsored, managed, distributed or provided by companies that 
are affiliates of Bank of America Corporation (""BofA Corp.""). MLPF&S is a registered broker-dealer, 
registered investment adviser, Member SIPC and a wholly owned subsidiary of BofA Corp. 
Merrill Private Wealth Management is a division of MLPF&S that offers a broad array of personalized 
wealth management products and services. Both brokerage and investment advisory services (including 
financial planning) are offered by the Private Wealth Advisors through MLPF&S. The nature and degree 
of advice and assistance provided, the fees charged, and client rights and Merrill's obligations will differ 
among these services. 
The banking, credit and trust services sold by Merrill's Private Wealth Advisors are offered by licensed 
banks and trust companies, including Bank of America, N.A., Member FDIC, and other affiliated banks. 
Banking products are provided by Bank of America, N.A., and affiliated banks, Members FDIC and wholly 
owned subsidiaries of BofA Corp. 
Investment products: 
Are Not FDIC Insured 	Are Not Bank Guaranteed 	May Lose Value 
The Bull Symbol and Merrill Lynch are trademarks of Bank of America Corporation. 
This report may not be reproduced or distributed without prior written consent. 
0 2019 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. I ARKQNX7F I 07/2019 
Site Map 4 Privacy & Security 0. Legal Information MLPF&S Financial Statement 0 PBIG.com  
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016803 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019103.txt,"woman is impregnated by a rapist, “it is something that God intended to
happen,” he jumped the sperm whale.

No professional comedian had the imagination to come up with
such tragicomic satirical concepts as those. The funniest thing is that
neither Akin nor Mourdock was trying to be funny. They were simply being
their ignorant selves, a pair of religious fanatics who worship a
micromanaging deity that made them legitimate assholes in the first place.
The good news is that they both were defeated on Election Day. The
Republican presidential campaign was crystallized by “Keep the
government out of my Medicare,” and the Democratic presidential
campaign was crystallized by “Keep the government out of my vagina.”

While Mitt Romney believes that life begins at conception, Rick
Santorum believes that life begins at foreplay. He has gone way beyond
his frenzied position against women’ s right to abortion. He’ s also
against birth control, even though that would prevent the need for an
abortion. He claims that “contraception is notokay” and that it turns sex
into “simply pleasure.” He has also vowed to “ban all pornography,”
even though watching porn would prevent the need for contraception.

And so it came to pass that Barack Obama was re-elected. His

opponent, Romney, fell to his knees and pleaded, “Oh, dear Lord, you

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019103
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029429.txt,"From: Joichi Ito 
Sent: 7/7/2017 12:05:21 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs 
Attachments: dkkolnphoaemodnh.png 
Importance: High 
FYI 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Maria T. Zuber"" < 
Subject: A message on the Trump Administration Proposal on Indirect Costs 
Date: July 6, 2017 at 12:27:05 PM EDT 
To: all-research@mitedu  
Cc: Suzanne Pettit < >, Paul Schierenbeck <___________________ 
Reply-To: 
III — 
1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 
Murtin A, Schmidt, Provost 
Maria T, 7Lihor. Vice President for Research 
Dear colleagues, 
We are writing to alert you to an issue that threatens all of MIT's federally funded research activities but that is often underappreciated. 
We're referring to the Trump Administration's proposal to put a 10 percent cap on indirect cost reimbursements to universities by the 
National Institutes of Health — an idea that is already beginning to be talked about for other federal agencies as well. 
An article explaining indirect costs and why they are important to MIT can be found in the most recent Faculty 
Newsletter: http://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/295/zuber.html. 
The Administration's proposed cuts to federal R&D agency budgets have rightly been met with consternation on campus. The indirect 
cost cap proposal is actually an even graver danger because it is easier for the government to institute, and it would do far-reaching 
damage that is harder to reverse. We need faculty and research staff to understand the devastating effects that capping indirect cost 
would cause to MIT and other research institutions. 
The indirect cost cap is easier to implement than a cut to the budget because the Administration can act unilaterally without 
Congressional approval. The proposed agency budget cuts are already running into strong headwinds on both sides of the aisle in 
Congress, and they cannot move forward without 60 votes in the U.S. Senate. The indirect cost cap, by contrast, does not attract the 
same level of attention because it is not well understood, and the Administration can simply impose a cap — at a single agency, or at all 
of them (since indirect cost reimbursement is fairly uniform across the government now). 
What would a 10 percent cap mean for MIT? A 10 percent cap on all federal agencies would cost MIT around $100 million a year. To 
put that in context, the financial crisis of 2008, where we saw a significant decline in endowment, required us to reduce spending by this 
same order of magnitude. Fortunately, the recovery of the endowment was relatively quick, and we were able to recoup some of that 
loss. In this case, the 10 percent cap is unlikely to be altered in the foreseeable future. Since this is a recurring cost, attempting to 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029429 
recover this in the future through endowment payout would require on the order of an additional $26 in endowment. These indirect cost 
funds partially reimburse MIT for upkeep of research buildings and equipment, and literally keeping the lights and heating and cooling 
systems on. A portion of the money also pays administrative costs required to implement federal regulations and to provide staff who 
help apply for and monitor federal grants. 
A cap on indirect costs would directly affect research and researchers. If MIT failed to receive the federal funds needed to operate 
research infrastructure, we would need to limit the number of federal grants that the Institute accepts. It would be necessary to 
introduce a process analogous to under-recovery of foundation proposals to identify the indirect costs to support each federal grant. 
While we would seek other ways to raise revenues, we would also need to cut other expenditures (e.g., through layoffs, salary freezes, 
etc.), reduce the use of research facilities to cut operating costs, and/or to allow facilities to deteriorate. All of our peer institutions are 
considering similar steps. In short, a cut to indirect costs is a cut to research funding. And it's a cut that's more difficult to handle than a 
decision by a federal agency not to fund a particular project in a given year. 
The percentage of federal research funding that goes to indirect costs has remained relatively steady for decades, and there has been 
a federal cap on administrative costs since the 1990s. The Administration may hope that a proposed cap on indirect costs is seen as 
mitigating the impact of their proposed 22% reduction of the NIH budget. Although it may obscure this impact, in reality it will worsen 
it. The Administration is claiming that a cut to indirect costs will not cut research, but in truth without indirect cost recovery, academic 
institutions, including MIT, will not be able to afford to support current levels of federal grants. 
The MIT administration is working on this matter with the urgency that it deserves. Let us be clear that no one on campus should be 
blasé or unconcerned about the proposal to cap indirect costs. Capping these costs will negatively impact every researcher at MIT. 
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. We will keep you informed as this situation evolves. 
Sincerely, 
Martin A. Schmidt 
Maria T. Zuber 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029430 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014147.txt,"(y) 8628 229-2020
EMS Vopusy
aSeuD eut €o

epujon ‘|espy

poe 28 22 00
(0) eb88 22 82b0

jneg ‘uoyog

WA PO! LMS ein

aienbs edsyays gz
alUieg ‘8Uu0}saj99q

(4) ogg 0z6$ 60200
PU TRUUN@YewWIN RWS
(mieces Spl $60 2 00
(d)p002 €e2 $60 Z 00

Jeu ‘nopeaqeyzq

(4) 6662 689-2020
2MS _“opud}
89@s1a) BLE} SUBEND pF

aHopeYyD gy UYyor ‘anAng

(2) Zezezez € Ce 00
(4) 26z@692b ¢ EE 00
SUB BOOSs
JOAHE\UOWY ORE BL

aBuessas.) ej op sau
j6in7 osung

dishes €L2 Lb6 +
WSG60 £25 212 4
bhoot ""pet “A £5

yuy

Dial =)

uon

Qa

(u) s86p Sp2-B0zo

eLAA

OPC

WHS CUsaS €
-  SO}UJLUOG
g dyiyg ‘esuung

(yjudo)s Cee E09 ZZ L00
4) 1260 PLO Zte 400
+A) OFB8 EE 212 100

Ups ‘auung

{i

A

B09C £49°2020

Gab 6

ce"" 2060
UOGUO7

SEINA Ps Udisutlest viz

ydeis 9 epuesy
uosuyor sequng

paqay - Auanba c7
psouned
aides

xi

aiijdos

Ap eee

X(#) 200% 066-2020

x a1ydos aaa 4 ¥20 4888

x weapon

(oaup xo eaRed,

‘HE PODAA
GO) mySuruga:
(1
iH Buuung O
* (4) dove} O
3] i?

He 68 weet
woorwadid ftp BOBB He
(pm)oces pzo Z

DESOES B92 bY
WELL

uopuo
Boney weYysuyong

yO, Jo ayng

SOM So
NEADS Coe os
BRON misty

Nou
jis
Ne
BOVOGNG

mt

SCRE
eeu

c
a

=
ot
NE
2)
twig
oad
Fey
ats}
35.
a)

ashe}, flemueg
quNoUE4 O09

sanjyuer rg | > aunsja’}
|neg ‘buysandg

(} gLolece tt 6 00

(y) @ S058 Li 6 00
JE OULOL

SE OA US Iq Bonuy 4S
oosgouel4y

‘ouepsoig-Aaisng

J UBGUAL C6p2 BL ZZ

€6
wl
yan ESZE Z
Guy 88 Osh
4) 28 LEZ
SB UE}SISSE-SUIUEL G
auugor d 7

£

UBALIINS © LYO
SeweURR go

(yu) syedeiy Fie

(m) 09/1 206 20
(eh $082 OE:
uioxBul

ayey OLreRL6.-0207
UOT - OAN OOP BE6 Zt
f ZOLAALM. Uoptio |
yeas ssnoybuipi

*n) 490) PuatuiE)
yoo hap@Acp ews

ON aooo

OD pep OOO

ow Pst
ABIGT SoOmIGOK
SN Tere Net

Sain I ie a

Lo)

Teh he!
TONS Oe a TT TT
SOPNOND BAD OF + FOL

lect elsed

IAD ip KIO

bene 24.c4 bud

Daan. co

BT OV
Om

ZS
>
res

aN

HL Sg aus Joosy
(4) sued jtubujuung
YIOA JO ssayong

55/8 9l€ 2020
Jaye ‘ujqng

i
i

21

GIUFFRE001593

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014147
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013628.txt,"Bible Church, Tulsa, Oklahoma. The pastor's witness of the Holy Ghost acting
through his life was his personal cure, by transformative Grace, of a triad of self-
destructively sinful addictions: alcohol, gambling and promiscuity. Self-chosen and
self-declared, he now served this two and a half year old growing congregation of
over 200, mostly young, working families. The young men in attendance at the
warehouse church were in shirts and ties, very unlike the more casual garments of
even dressy occasions in Southern California at that time. Women were dressed
simply and modestly. Most of the children were in Sunday school in a small
neighboring store in the strip mall during the adult service. The few that
accompanied their parents were remarkably well behaved | was told that most

t

families tithed 10% of their income. They quoted Hebrews, “...king of the
righteous...to whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all....” They believed that
their tithe would be returned manifold and the yellow Cadillac Deville served as
Pastor Carl Austin’s personal evidence. From these funds, the congregation
supported the pastor, his car, the rental expenses of the Sunday warehouse church
and an orphanage in a small Mexican border town. Some of these children, several
neurologically disabled, were bussed to the Sunday service for healing. They sat
together in a section in the front of the congregation and were the beneficiaries of
the second Sunday collection plate, passed around after the first one that was
designated for the church and its pastor.

The first Sunday sermon | heard in the warehouse followed several awkward
minutes of Pastor-directed warm up hugs of neighboring strangers while the choir
sang hymns. The songs were accompanied by instruments playing the melody in
unison sans harmony, and accented by the beats of two loud drums. As the volume
and pace of singing increased, | saw several episodes of ecstatic looks and fainting,
dying in the Lord and shouts of praise with upraised hands. The intermittent
elevation of the hands during prayer and song appeared to be spontaneous. | was
told that the arms were up as antennae, feeling the energy of Lord all around us.

tt

The pastor’s topic was forgiveness. From Ephesians, “...let all bitterness, wrath,

anger, clamor, and evil speaking be put away from you, along with all malice... be

kind to one another, tender hearted, forgiving one another, just as God in Christ

128

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013628
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019665.txt,"The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 177

tions. When they discussed Snowden’s legal situation in America,
Snowden expressed an interest in obtaining some form of amnesty
from prosecution. Wizner was willing to attempt to explore making
a possible deal with the Department of Justice, but it would not be an
easy task, especially if Snowden had turned over NSA documents to
a foreign power.

Even to argue that Snowden was merely an NSA whistle-blower
presented a serious challenge for Wizner. The ACLU had been
involved with previous NSA whistle-blowers, but Snowden’s case
differed from those cases in important ways. Those whistle-blowers
had not intentionally taken any NSA documents. Snowden, on the
other hand, had not only taken a large number of NSA documents
but also released tens of thousands of these top secret files to jour-
nalists based in Germany and Brazil, as well as to other unauthor-
ized recipients. In addition, the Whistleblower Protection Act, passed
by Congress in 1989, does not exempt an insider, such as Snowden,
who signs a secrecy oath from the legal consequences of disclos-
ing classified documents to journalists or other unauthorized people.

© Consequently, getting some form of amnesty for Snowden required ©
bolstering his image as a person taking personal risks to fight for
America. But if Snowden had taken even a single top secret docu-
ment to Russia, it would strengthen the case in the court of public
opinion that he had stolen communications intelligence secrets with
the intent to damage the United States, which under the provisions
of federal law could be considered espionage. In this regard, Kucher-
ena’s disclosure was extremely damaging to Snowden’s position, and
Snowden had, after all, already found refuge in Russia. Snowden
had two options, according to Wizner, the “first is to be where he is
in Russia. And the second is to be in a maximum security prison cell,
cut off from the world.” These, of course, would be the options of
any espionage defector who fled to Russia.

One way to mitigate the damage was for Snowden to substitute
a new narrative. Wizner took it upon himself to screen potential
journalists and other outlets for Snowden. He told a reporter for
The New York Times that, except for Oliver Stone, all individu-
als who have “met with Snowden have just gone through me, and
we've hooked it up.” Nor did he limit his extraordinary control to

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 177 ® 9/30/16 11:09 AM | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019665
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016319.txt,"When it comes to real robots helping real people, the standard definition of AI
fails us, for two fundamental reasons: First, optimizing the robot’s reward function in
isolation is different from optimizing it when the robot acts around people, because
people take actions too. We make decisions in service of our own interests, and these
decisions dictate what actions we execute. Moreover, we reason about the robot—that is,
we respond to what we think it’s doing or will do and what we think its capabilities are.
Whatever actions the robot decides on need to mesh well with ours. This is the
coordination problem.

Second, it is ultimately a human who determines what the robot’s reward function
should be in the first place. And they are meant to incentivize robot behavior that
matches what the end-user wants, what the designer wants, or what society as a whole
wants. I believe that capable robots that go beyond very narrowly defined tasks will need
to understand this to achieve compatibility with humans. This is the va/ue-alignment
problem.

The Coordination Problem: People are more than objects in the environment.

When we design robots for a particular task, it’s tempting to abstract people away. A
robotic personal assistant, for example, needs to know how to move to pick up objects, so
we define that problem in isolation from the people for whom the robot is picking these
objects up. Still, as the robot moves around, we don’t want it bumping into anything, and
that includes people, so we might include the physical location of the person in the
definition of the robot’s state. Same for cars: We don’t want them colliding with other
cars, so we enable them to track the positions of those other cars and assume that they’ ll
be moving consistently in the same direction in the future. A human being, in this sense,
is no different to a robot from a ball rolling on a flat surface. The ball will behave in the
next few seconds the same way it behaved in the past few; it keeps rolling in the same
direction at roughly the same speed. This is of course nothing like real human behavior,
but such simplification enables many robots to succeed in their tasks and, for the most
part, stay out of people’s way. A robot in your house, for example, might see you
coming down the hall, move aside to let you pass, and resume its task once you’ve gone
by.

As robots have become more capable, though, treating people as consistently
moving obstacles is starting to fall short. A human driver switching lanes won’t continue
in the same direction but will move straight ahead once they’ ve made the lane change.
When you reach for something, you often reach around other objects and stop when you
get to the one you want. When you walk down a hallway, you have a destination in
mind: You might take a right into the bedroom or a left into the living room. Relying on
the assumption that we’re no different from a rolling ball leads to inefficiency when the
robot stays out of the way if it doesn’t need to, and it can imperil the robot when the
person’s behavior changes. Even just to stay out of the way, robots have to be somewhat
accurate at anticipating human actions. And, unlike the rolling ball, what people will do
depends on what they decide to do. So to anticipate human actions, robots need to start
understanding human decision making. And that doesn’t mean assuming that human
behavior is perfectly optimal; that might be enough for a chess- or Go-playing robot, but
in the real world, people’s decisions are less predictable than the optimal move in a board
game.

99

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016319
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011287.txt,"Esa Origins 7 February 24 — 26, 2017
PROJECT An Origins Project Scientific Workshop
Challenges of Artificial Intelligence:

Envisioning and Addressing Adverse Outcomes

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

colleague and drastically different from the one seen by a member of another nation state, or a
supporter of a different political party, or someone ina different consumer profile category.

Al ATTACKS ON SOURCES AND IDENTITY

Messaging and persuasion promises to be amplified by the use of simulated yet believable,
realistic, yet synthetic audio, photos, and even video that make believable, persuasive content to
the next level. Beyond influencing citizens and affecting democracy, such content, including false
signaling, can be injected in sequences with careful timing so as to influence leaders (or machines
themselves over time) to create crises, or even escalations to frank warfare. So, messaging and
persuasion promises to be assisted and amplified by the use of simulated yet believable, realistic,
yet synthetic content, audio, photos, and even video that make believable, persuasive content to
the next level. Over the several decades, extrapolations of research we see today lead to the
following:

e Generative models that produce audio or video of anyone saying anything. There is already
substantial work on “style transfer” as well as photorealistic generative models in many domains.
Speech synthesis is becoming similarly competent. It is inevitable that we will be able to make
synthetic video and audio that is completely indistinguishable from the real thing.

e Generative models that produce coherent text content that appears as if has been written by a
human. Such generative content will be able to appear if the content was written by a particular
person. For example, in 2030 it will likely to possible for anyone to write a 4 paragraph email that
reads like it was written by your close friend.

e Adaptive botnets, worms, or viruses that use modern machine learning techniques to learn and
adapt. Viruses and botnets already cause a huge amount of damage by just copying code across
many computers. If they had the ability to design and experiment with new attack strategies, and
communicate what they learn to other copies, defending against them could become even more
difficult. Similarly ML could be used to make DDoS attacks more effective.

e Automated analysis of software vulnerabilities. People are already using ML to try to detect
vulnerabilities (for the purpose of defending against them) -- it is only a matter of time before they
start being used for attack (if they aren’t being so used already).

The above capabilities, together with similar powers of synthesis that we are likely to develop in the
next 15 years, could potentially combine to make the internet much more vulnerable to attack at much
lower cost, and by a wider set of people, than ever before. The first two capabilities would seem to
make it much easier to launch automated social engineering attacks with much higher success rates
than e.g. current spam email and phishing attacks, while the second two capabilities might make
technical attacks much more effective.

Combined, all of these capabilities could conspire to create an internet ecosystem where it is very

difficult to trust the communication that you receive and very easy to intercept, spoof, steal, or alter
communication, as well as to improperly gain control of internet resources. This is obviously already

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011287
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012536.txt,"nsor & Associates

Reporting and Transeuiptioa, Ins.

Page 22
' BY MR. GOLDBERGER:

Q, Every time you went back to Jeffrey's house
you went back there because you wanted to, right?

A. Uh-huh, yes.

Q. No one -- certainly Mr. Epstein never tried
to persuade you or induce you or entice you or coerce you
to engage in any kind of sex?

A. No.

QO. And no one representing Jeffrey Epstein
ever tried to persuade or induce you to engage in sex?

A. No.

Okay.

Like there was no ifs, ands or buts about

Q. There was a time when there was a concert
or a show down in Fort Lauderdale and Jeffrey got you
tickets to go to that show because it was your birthday,
right?

Correct.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012536

Sev SU es ecaee Tae are

Tarienrnaae

Mason nahn

"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017201.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

After some legal argument, Judge Alberti declared that he was ready to see Deep Throat to
decide whether it was obscene. I argued that the judge need not view the film: no matter what its
content, I said, it would be unconstitutional for him to enjoin the showing of any film. If the D.A.
thought the film was obscene, he could wait until it was exhibited and then arrest those
responsible for its being shown. Judge Alberti insisted, however, on having Deep Throat
screened for him. As the equipment was being wheeled in the courtroom, I informed the judge
that I had no intention of watching the film.

I was preserving an important point for any jury trial that the students might have in the future. I
would tell the jurors that I had never seen Deep Throat because I had chosen not to, and that they
had never seen Deep Throat because they had chosen not to. I would argue that the right to
choose not to see a film is just as important as the right to choose to see a film. Indeed, most
countries that prevent their citizens from seeing certain films also require their citizens to see
other films. I would remind the jurors that it was the District Attorney who was making them see
a film they had chosen not to see, in order to have them decide whether other people, who have
also chosen not to see would be offended if they were to see it. I hoped, by this argument, to
point out the absurd nature of the jurors’ task in an obscenity prosecution, and to get them to
focus on the important issue —namely, whether the outside of the movie theater, the only thing
that the unwilling public may have to endure, is offensive to those who cannot avoid it.

Judge Alberti excused me from watching Deep Throat, and Stork, Hagen and I left the courtroom
while the judge, half a dozen assistant D.A.’s, and a few court house personnel watched Linda
Lovelace and Harry Reems on a small video machine.

After about forty minutes Judge Alberti abruptly stopped the videotape and summoned us back
into court. “I’ve seen enough,” he declared with a disgusted look on his face. Then, turning to
me, he said, “You’re the lucky one. I had to sit through that trash.” The judge then declined to
issue an injunction against the scheduled showing of Deep Throat, because although he regarded
it as degrading both to men and women, he found that it was not obscene under the relevant
Massachusetts standards. The film would be shown that night.

When IJ arrived at Quincy House shortly before eight o’clock, a circus atmosphere prevailed.
Hundreds of pickets marched outside urging potential viewers to stay away. There was some
pushing and shoving. Slogans were shouted: “Freedom of the Press is not Freedom to Molest.”
“Pornography is an incitement to violence.”

I walked past the pickets and spoke to the assembled viewers and protesters:
Whether you folks like it or not, you are part of a rather important political event...I am
not here to either encourage or discourage the students who decided to see this

film...Were I not involved in this lawsuit, I would be out there defending the rights of
those picketers to...persuade you not to see this film.

114

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017201
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018132.txt,"The GPS shoes from GTX ( GTXO - news - people ) tackle another senior problem--folks

who have Alzheimer's who wander and are at risk of getting lost or injured. A GPS device in one
of the shoes will alert a caregiver if the wearer leaves a specified area. Don't expect the latest
styles from Nike ( NKE - news - people ) or Steve Madden ( shoo - news - people ) . The
manufacturer is Aetrex Worldwide, an orthodic and medical specialty shoe maker. Roll-out is

expected by year's end.
Read the full story
Keeping an eye on Mom and Dad

Remote monitoring technology aims to keep seniors in their houses and out of nursing homes

Over the coming months a raft of new-and-improved remote monitoring devices will hit the
market, from GPS shoes that can track the whereabouts of wandering seniors to MedCottages,
portable RV-like units equipped with motion and monitoring systems that allow seniors to
maintain some independence from the backyard of their adult childrens’ homes.

“As we age, this is going to be a growing trend,” says Laurie Orlov, a Florida-based expert on so-
called “aging-in-place technology” aimed at keeping seniors in their houses and out of nursing
homes as long as possible.

“We have to get past the fear and antagonism among the older people who need it the most. I don’t
think they’re that technology-ready, but the boomers, who are their adult children, certainly are.”
Motion sensors strategically placed in the three-bedroom home where Howe has lived for 53 years
feed information right to her daughter’s laptop, detailing when she got out of bed (the Friday we
chatted it was 9 a.m.), walked into the bathroom (9:15 a.m.) or hovered at the kitchen table where
she keeps her pills (9:30 a.m.)

Even her blood-pressure reading (165/76) is fed to her daughter’s computer, along with her daily
weigh-in tally, providing a detailed graph which she often takes to her doctor appointments.

The only thing GrandCare can’t tell Pierce, because her system doesn’t include cameras, is if her
mother actually swallowed her pills.

Monitoring and in-home help technologies will be a $20 billion U.S. business in North America by
2020, predicts Orlov, founder of Aging In Place Technology Watch.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018132
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033567.txt,"From: Nicholas Rib <i

Sent: 2/28/2019 3:03:20 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: DC attorney general subpoenas Trump’s inaugural committee

https: //nypost.com/2019/02/27/dc-attorney-general-subpoenas-trumps-inaugural-
committee/?utm_campai gn=iosapp&utm_source=message_app

Sent from my iPhone

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033567
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015610.txt,"victim to foster his goal of putting her into “jail” or of bringing a new action against Jane Doe No.
3. See Peisach v. Antuna, 539 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Citimortgage, Inc. v.
Davis, No. 50 2009 CA 030523, 2011 WL 3360318 (Fla. 15"" Cir. Ct. Apr. 4, 2011). Defendant
should be precluded from asking any questions about Jane Doe No. 3’s experiences as a sexually
trafficked minor. Defendant should be precluded from questioning Jane Doe No. 3 about
individuals that she was sexually trafficked to or about other victims or individuals involved in the
sexual trafficking orchestrated by Jeffrey Epstein. Defendant should be precluded from
questioning Jane Doe No. 3 about any rapes that occurred when she was a minor child. Defendant
should be precluded from questioning Jane Doe No. 3 about anything related to her sexual activity
either as a minor or thereafter as these questions would only be intended to embarrass and harass
this non-party witness.

b. Language and Harassment Limitations

In addition, Jane Doe No. 3 requests that the Court provide counsel with a cautionary
notice, that counsel for Defendant may not harass the non-party victim in any way during the
deposition. With respect to the language used at the deposition, the Defendant’s counsel should be
directed by the Court to not use any of the derogatory terms the Defendant has used in the press
including calling Jane Doe No. 3 a “prostitute,” a “liar,” or a “bad mother” or any other similar
derogatory and harassing language.

c. Physical Location Limitations

Non-party Jane Doe No. 3 has a valid and real basis to fear being in physical proximity of
the Defendant. See Exhibit 8, Affidavit of Jane Doe No. 3. Accordingly, to the extent a
deposition is to go forward, we would request that the Court direct that the Defendant not be
present in the same room as non-party Jane Doe No. 3 and, instead, follow the testimony
electronically from a separate location. In addition, non-party Jane Doe No. 3 respectfully

requests that the Court hold that the physical location of the deposition should be the offices of
12

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015610
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024473.txt,"4. CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth KUE’s cash, cash equivalents and senior capitalization as of December 31,

2005:

@ onan actual basis; and

—® ona pro forma basis to give effect to the sale of $1 billion in Units in this offering by KUE after
deducting estimated offering fees and estimated offering expenses payable by KUE.

You should read this table together with “Management's Discussion and Analysis of KLC’s Pro Forma
Results of Operations” and the audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related
notes appearing elsewhere in this Memorandum. See “Related Party Transactions” for more information

on related party interests.

KUE Senior Capitalization

As of April 1, 2006
Actual _Adjustments' _ Pro Forma

Cash

KUE

KUE Inc.

KSI

KLC OpCo

KLC PropCo _
Total Cash

Debt

KUE”

KUE Inc.®

KLC OpCo — Sr. Sub. Notes
KLC OpCo - Capital Leases
KLC PropCo - CMBS

KLC PropCo - Junior Mezzanine*

Total Debt

Preferred Equity
KUE®

Total Debt and Preferred Equity

' Assumes $50 million of fees and expenses.

$9.4
5.4
3.0
115.4
31.8
$164.9

$150.0
183.9
260.0
16.2
697.7
147.9
$1,455.7

180.0
$1,635.7

$800.0

$800.0

($150.0)

(180.0)

$809.4
5.4

3.0
115.4
31.8
$964.9

$0.0
183.9
260.0
16.2
697.7
147.9
$1,305.7

0.0
$1,305.7

? Upon closing, KUE LLC will contribute all of its assets to KUE. In addition, upon contribution of assets to KUE by KUE LLC, KUE will
become a co-borrower to the KUE LLC term Joan which will be repaid with the proceeds of the offering.

3 includes capitalized interest of $10.7 million.

i Represents book value net of original issue discount plus capitalized interest. Original principal amount is $150 million.
5 Reflects the conversion of existing preferred limited partner units of KUE LLC into common limited partner units of KUE at the offering

price.

40

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024473
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027210.txt,"Message: Ok

Sender:

Time: 03/11/17 10:18:39 AM (510949119)

Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 0814B35E-2F42-469E-8 134-1 FBAOB8ACS516

Message: http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/10/14880094/deepmind-health-uk-data-blockchain-audit

Sender:

Time: 03/15/17 07:31:40 AM (511281100)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 78D02A64-53 1B-4DD2-BA52-FDC44996B2F3
Message: Are you in NYC 23/24?

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/15/17 07:31:47 AM (511281107)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2ED14B8C-3A FA-4227-932F-99FFED040C83
Message: unlikely

Sender:

Time: 03/15/17 07:33:09 AM (511281189)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 24260EB3-6D0E-40E5S-849F-AFBA62D02E22
Message: Any news / anything interesting BG in D.C. 20/21

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/15/17 07:33:40 AM (511281220)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7DBCA855-1B53-49C9-A773-OCDOCFF 1 F006
Message: he should meet with tom barrack, if he wants traction

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/15/17 07:34:17 AM (511281257)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2A978A2E-91DE-44F9-937B-4A AEBADSDED6
Message: what happened to the jack ma deal

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027210
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032679.txt,"communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032679
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028123.txt,"on security and foreign affairs. Barely three weeks after I joined the
government, we had to decide on the most important agreement with the
Palestinians since Oslo. Dubbed Oslo II, it involved a major transfer of
authority and territory. The process would begin with our pulling out from more
than a quarter of the West Bank, including the major Palestinian towns and
some 450 smaller towns and villages. After that, there would be three further
redeployment phases, at six-month intervals, in so-called “Area C” of the West
Bank — a mix of unpopulated land, settlements and a number of points we’d
designated as strategically important. Under Oslo, and its parent agreement
Camp David, it was all part of ensuring the Palestinians could exercise their
“legitimate rights” in the “single territorial entity” of the West Bank and Gaza —
in other words, a path to statehood. But only by the time the final three phases
of redeployment were complete were we required to begin the “permanent-
status” talks on issues like land and borders, Israeli settlements, the future of
Jerusalem: the real core of a peace agreement.

By the time I joined the discussions on Oslo I in August 1995, the main
points had already been agreed. Rabin was in favor, as were virtually all the
cabinet ministers. Whatever scant influence I might exercise would have to
come at the decisive cabinet meeting, set for August 13. From the objections I’d
raised to the Gaza-Jericho deal as chief of staff, Rabin knew I’d be concerned
not only to ensure the security provisions avoided potential misunderstandings
on the ground, but about the longer-term implications, especially since the scale
of the Israeli withdrawals was much larger this time. In fact, the agreement
could be interpreted as requiring us to cede Palestinian control over virtually all
of Gaza and West Bank by the end of the third redeployment phase —quite
possibly before talks on the permanent-status questions had even begun.

I went to see Rabin a few days before the cabinet vote. I explained why I
thought the agreement was flawed. I argued we should either delay some of our
redeployments or bring the permanent-status negotiations forward. He listened
to me. He barely spoke. He knew I'd be against Oslo II, and knew the reasons
why. But we both knew something else: having been brought into government
by Rabin, I would be expected, on a vote of this importance, to be in his corner.

The cabinet vote wasn’t happening in a political vacuum. Likud’s defeat in
1992 had meant the end of Yitzhak Shamir’s leadership. The new Likud leader
was the former Sayeret Matkal officer with whom I’d shared a newspaper cover
in 1986 predicting that he and I would end up facing each other at the ballot
box: Bibi Netanyahu. Positioning himself as the fresh young face of Israeli

275
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028123
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021142.txt,"36 ‘ MICHAEL WOLFE

Trump's stupidity, said Bannon, could sometimes be made into a vir-
tue. Here was Bannon's idea: the president should make a retroactive claim
of executive privilege. I didn’t know. Nobody told me. I was ill-advised.

It was hard not to see Bannon’s satisfaction in a prostrate Trump
admitting to his own lack of guile and artfulness.

Bannon understood that this claim of retroactive executive privilege
would have no chance of success—nor should it. But the sheer audacity
of it could buy them four or five months of legal delay. Delay was their
friend, possibly their only friend. They could work this claim of retroac-
tive executive privilege, no matter how loopy, all the way to the Supreme
Court.

For this plan to work, the president would have to get rid of his inept
lawyers. Oh, and he would also have to fire Rod Rosenstein, the deputy
attorney general who was overseeing the Mueller investigation. Bannon
had been against the firing of Comey, and in the months after the appoint-
ment of the special counsel, he had fought the president's almost daily
impulse to fire Mueller and Rosenstein, seeing this as the surest invitation
to impeachment. (“Just don’t pay attention to his crazy shit” he had urged
everyone around the president.) But now they had run out of options.

“Firing Rosenstein is our only way out of here” Bannon told Costa.
“I don't come to this lightly. As soon as they went to Cohen—that’s what
they do in Mob prosecutions to get a response from the true target. So
you can sit there and get bled out—get indicted, go to grand juries—or
you can fight it politically. Get it out of the law-and-order system where
we are losing and are going to lose. A new DAG will review where we
stand on this thing, which could take a couple of months. Delay, delay,
delay—and shift it politically. Can we win? I have no fucking idea. But I
know on that other path I’m going to lose. It’s not perfect . . . but we live
in a world of imperfect”

+

Costa’s story, which was posted online later that day, described Bannon as
“pitching a plan to West Wing aides and congressional allies to cripple the
federal probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, according
to four people familiar with the discussions.” But however many people

SIEGE 37

Costa had spoken to about the background machinations of Steve Ban-
non, what mattered was that he had spoken directly and at length to
Bannon himself, who was using the Washington Post to pitch a plan to
the president.

Bannonss three-part plan for Trump instantly made its way to the
Oval Office. And the next morning, the president offered Kushner his
view that he should fire Rosenstein, reinstate a claim of executive privi-
lege, and get a tough-guy lawyer.

Kushner, pressing his own strategies, urged his father-in-law to move
cautiously when it came to Rosenstein.

“Jared is spooked,” said a scornful Trump later that day while on the
phone to a confidant. “What a girl!”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021142
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017215.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

Not only has the verdict of history condemned the words of the Sedition Act, it has also
condemned the selective manner in which it was enforced against certain journalists and
newspapers but not others. If there are to be any restrictions of freedom in the press, they should
be applied uniformly. Ifthe publication of classified material is to be prosecuted, then all who
publish it should be prosecuted, not only the marginal, the powerless, the “irresponsible” and the
unpatriotic --- in the eyes of the government . If all are prosecuted, there is the possibility of the
self-correcting mechanism of democracy operating to change the law, by narrowing it to
criminalize only those categories of currently classified information that truly endanger national
security. If untrammeled prosecutorial discretion is permitted, then the law can be kept as broad
and overinclusive as it currently is, without fear that the New York Times will be caught in its
web. But if only the weak and the unpopular are selected for prosecution, the pressures for
change will diminish.

Moreover, selective prosecution of only certain journalists who violate broad statutes will
encourage some in the media to curry favor with the government, and the government to curry
favor with certain media. This is an unhealthy and dangerous relationship in a democracy in
which the press is supposed to check the government and be independent of its control.

The exercise of some discretion is necessary under the statutory scheme that currently
criminalizes the publication of classified material. If all journalists who publish any classified
material were to be prosecuted, there would be few left. The New York Times and its publishers,
editors, and national security reporters would be convicted felons, since the current statutes are
written in the broadest of terms that invite the exercise of discretion, which has always been
employed to immunize the mainstream media.

In a definitive history of this problem, the author, Gabriel Schoenfeld, argues that an appropriate
balance must be struck and that neither the press nor Congress can be relied on to strike that
balance. Surprisingly, and wrongly in my view, he places his greatest reliance on the exercise of
prosecutorial discretion and in the common sense of juries. History has not vindicated this trust,
especially in times of national turmoil and fear. For me, a better democratic answer is for the
courts to demand that legislatures enact clear, precise and extremely limited prohibitions on the
real-time disclosure of only the most necessary of secrets. These statutes must neither be
overinclusive or underinclusive (as are current laws). They should be capable of uniform and
universal application that constrain the power of the government to pick and choose. Precise
codification is not a perfect solution to an intractable dilemma, but it would be a significant
improvement over the unacceptable current situation.

In vibrant democracies there will always be tensions between the government’s need to keep
secrets and the news media’s need to reveal them. There will never be a perfect solution or an

agreed-upon balance. This is as it should be. Constant tension between the government and the
press is an essential requisite of our system of checks and balances.

128

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017215
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023308.txt,"and attention to details and mechanics. with regard Phaidon I was not shown one single document , not

one.!! Brad wanted to keep it private between he, and his so called "" advisors"" however as he was out of the
office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the
situation in your office is totally ludicrous - to summarize - the list I provided to Brad last December -

of things I thought were a priority to get done - still remains in the whole unresolved.

The IT, is virtually untouched and is still in desperate need of a format - reporting flawed cumbersome and
inaccurate . all done by hand as one -off exercises , when either you or brad ask for it - airplane: re structure,
(my only suggested priority in june ) is really ,no further ahead, ,consultants up the kazoo but nothing at all
done.( the office was told by Brad not to share the outside proposals with me - brad has no idea even as to
what questions to ask. he knows little of finance, is bullshitted over by almost everyone in the office. a little
man , using your power, to appear larger . Eileen was self aware enough to know she was over her head , that is
a huge difference. bad info is rampant a simple emblematic example- 3 million in deductions Im told
were taken for art space but on closer examination it turns out they cannot be used at all. ( ZERO benefit
) though you will be told yes they were deducted on the return they said that is the only real question you were
focused on ! "" were they deducted "" not -"" is there a benefit"" !! I asked for the balance sheet and P and L
for Regan arts , a basic first step in order to check your financials. ""sorry we never got one?"" though 9.8
million invested, no p&l, nothing!, a construction project run amok , no budget, the coo fired after only 3
months. , no clue. fyi artspace financials are also a total mess. ( no receivables ??). when i asked for a list of
what got done and did not, i received the email from Brad basicailly mind you own business. so much was
promised. !!!

As in your words probably your closest friend and in order to turn the page. I hope the following to
be constructive

Here is alist of things I think would be in your interest to get done asap .but definitely not by me .

isuggest you form new grats. , hire a high level tax partner. use your trading accounts as they remain

a paramount requirement 16 months after i emailed you re their importance. THe Phaidon transaction papered
and structured as contemplated DOES NOT WORK , its as simple as that DOES NOT !! I suggest again
that you re-do bank loans. no need to pay interest at higher rates on boat or plane. . as Richard is now no
longer trustee. re- do will, make suydam executor , with Barry, and john as back up. pay 1 million a year for
executor role. get rid of Judy Black trust, deal with gifts and their tax returns, . review amounts to kids at fixed
ages. put more protections in for Alex and Victoria. , distribute some money to kids let them make

decisions. , decide art division with children in attendance . have fire drill done on estate. fill out

estate returns as if you and Debra died today, choose advisers - rick bronstein said the only 1040 he ever filled
out was his own. Halperin has a conflict that should be addressed., A strategy of the use of art should be
implemented. . you have tax consultants it consultants. plane operation consultant. . boat

consultants. architects, lighting , art, legal, . foundation , deal with TRA , BRH, rationalize

investments. cash flow. reporting, gaming disclosures. foreign, gift. . prepare tax projections for 15 and 16, .
deal with neg basis ( tufts gain, debt financed. art partnership, pledges. sell stock , art, deal with phaidon

debt. athene,? income, capital , foreign , exit, corporate, insurance regs, out and inbound

issues, basis, appropriate discount rates. ? terminations. control. , qualified dividends. corporate

tolls, inversion rules. , grat issues, short swing and other sec disclosures, I still think you might consider a
Rothshcild bank transaction they have 150b and a distribution network with no products , private

bank Rockefeller Rothschild. financial service. deal with UK visa issue sooner rather than later. we can talk
about Rowen request re Athene , complex 2 billion in taxes on transaction. ?!

the facts as i see them

in June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout., then only after weeks, when you
delayed any detailed discussion of money wanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully
understand ) . you unilaterally changed changed our agreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and
out of the remaining 15m ,? 1 would receive only a third. ( note : I'm confident that both the debt , and the
artspace investment will also lead to a write off of another 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023308
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018126.txt,"Read the full article

Future Family: Life In the Digital Age preview.

The Discovery Channel - Nov. 13, 2010 - This patient education program explores how
baby boomers the 78 million Americans born in the wake of World War II are embracing
technology to better manage increased work and home responsibilities. Future Family discusses
the GPS footwear by GTX Corp.

View the show - Part 1

View the show - Part 2

Wireless Technology on Black Friday: Smart Phones Good, PNDs Bad According to
WedBush

World Market Media - Tom Copeland - December 1, 2010 -

The biggest holiday shopping days of the year has passed and many

investors want to know: How did wireless technology do? According to Scott Sutherland, CFA
with Wedbush Securities, the answer is pretty good — depending on which companies you’re
invested in.

Read the full article

Andrew Carle on Elder Tech Trends

Eldergadget.com - November 5, 2010 - ElderGadget’s Michael Goldman starts the series
with a conversation with Andrew Carle, an Assistant Professor at George Mason University.
Andrew is also an expert on technology development for seniors, and is a consultant for the
Nintendo Corp., GTX Corp., and several other companies about how to make their newest gadgets
more elder friendly.

Listen to Podcast interview with Andrew Carle

How does a GPS tracking system work?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018126
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015604.txt,"not be had” or that “the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions...”. Fla. R.
Civ. P. 1.280(c).

Defendant issued a vastly overbroad subpoena to this non-party which included 25
separate document requests, many with subparts. In addition to placing an undue burden on this
non-party to have to search for the broad scope of materials requested, the document requests seek
information that is irrelevant to the Florida Defamation Action and clearly intended to “embarrass
and oppress” this non-party. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(c). Defendant’s overly broad subpoena to non-
party, Jane Doe No. 3, goes so far as to seek documents relating to former President, Bill Clinton
and former Vice President, Al Gore, which, even if such documents existed, would be absolutely
irrelevant to the Florida Defamation Action. See Toledo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 30 So. 3d
712 (Fla. 4"" DCA 2010).

Defendant’s requests can be grouped into four key categories: (1) documents that contain
highly personal and sensitive information sought only to harass, embarrass and intimidate the non-
party; (2) documents unrelated to this action and, instead, intended to gain discovery relating to
Defendant’s admitted “goal” of putting this non-party in “jail,” bringing a new case against Jane
Doe No. 3, or related to the federal action; (3) documents that contain personal financial or other
confidential information; and (4) privileged communications between the non-party and her
lawyers. Non-party, Jane Doe No. 3, has filed specific objections as to each request sought in
Defendant’s subpoena as set forth in Exhibit 9. Here, Jane Doe No. 3 provides the Court with a
sampling of the oppressive nature of the subpoena that is the subject of her detailed objections.

a. Category 1 — Overly Broad Subpoena Requests Intended Solely to Harass, Embarrass
and Intimidate the Non-Party by Seeking Highly Personal and Sensitive Information

It is clear from the Defendant’s requests that his intent is to intimidate and harass this non-
party by seeking highly sensitive personal information that is irrelevant to this action. For

example, Request no. 16 seeks “Any diary, journal or calendar concerning your activities between

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015604
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033573.txt,"Share This Newsletter

F amore

#=-| Share

= Tweet

==
#=-| Share

F Eeeree|

#==-| Forward

Follow Me Online

Facebook
Page

DarylCagle.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033573
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024467.txt,"Partners to exchange their interests in KUE and the General
Partner for interests In a subsidiary of KUE.

Related Party Transactions: Related party transactions include transactions between (1)
any of the Principals or any of their affiliates or any entity
controlled by any of the Principals, and (2) KUE or any direct
or indirect subsidiary or joint venture of KUE involving more
than $1 million (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any
merger, acquisition, asset purchase or similar transaction
between KUE, its subsidiaries or joint ventures, on the one
hand, and any person of which fifteen percent (15%) or more
of the voting stock (or similar voting interests) is owned by
KUE LLC or its affiliates, on the other hand). Related party
transactions do not include (a) any transaction solely
between or among KUE and any of its direct or indirect
subsidiaries or joint ventures in which the Principals do not
have any direct or indirect ownership interest (ofher than as
a result of their ownership in the General Partner and KUE),
(b) reasonable and customary director, advisory board
member, or consultant compensation and benefits
(including, without limitation, retirement, health, stock option
and other benefit plans) as approved by the Independent
Committee, provided that any such compensation, benefits
and arrangements to the Principals that do not exceed $1
million in the aggregate annually shall not be subject to such
approval, and customary indemnification arrangements, (c)
transactions and arrangements pursuant to or contemplated
by express terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement of
KUE, including the “Investment in Subsidiaries"" and ""Co-
Invest Right"" described below, and any payments pursuant
thereto, and the Fixed Overhead Payment described above,
(d) agreements, transactions and arrangements described in
“Related Party Transactions” in this Private Placement
Memorandum and any amendment thereto (so long as such
amendment is not disadvantageous to the Investors as a
whole in any material respect) or any transaction
contemplated thereby and any payments pursuant thereto,
and (e) admissions of any affiliate of the Principals to KUE
as a Limited Partner on terms substantially equivalent to
concurrent admissions of persons that are not affiliates of
the Principals.

lf the size of the related party transaction is greater than $1
million and equal to or less than $50 million, then either (a)
the Independent Committee must approve the transaction or
‘(b) the transaction must be approved by the holders of a
majority of the Common LP Units unaffiliated with the
Principals.

lf the size of the related party transaction is greater than $50
million, then the transaction must be approved by both (a)
the Independent Committee and (b) the holders of a majority
of the Common LP Units unaffiliated with the Principals.

34

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024467
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027204.txt,"Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/06/17 09:43:26 AM (510515006)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 6EDB350B-5252-4668-A861-9246FC2C9916
Message: Sat

Sender:

Time: 03/06/17 10:08:10 AM (510516490)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 004A6AA1-EAE8-46DA-B4C2-56CF4FF33 136
Message: Bg very interested in Middle East right now

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 03/06/17 10:09:04 AM (510516544)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: ED01C225-7C95-40AF-A003-A58356DBOB11
Message: Dubai / Saudi ? Qatar all very very good buds

Sender:

Time: 03/06/17 10:09:20 AM (510516560)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 037B3D4A-4762-4CAA-BC2C-2E3AF7376ED7
Message: Israel plus emirates and sort of Saudi

Sender:

Time: 03/06/17 10:09:25 AM (510516565)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 4D1C7834-6379-49B 1-B669-8A871AE83D19
Message: Qatar too

Sender:

Time: 03/06/17 10:09:45 AM (510516585)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: C82AE472-1264-44D3-8542-06A262F2D028

Message: He wants me to arrange a learning trip on TECHNOLOGIES emerging from the region

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027204
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021156.txt,"did massage on the side, I stated I was only reading the book and had not
yet began to study but one day J would love to practice massage therapy.

She introduced herself as Ghislane Maxwell. I would later find out that
she was the daughter of the late prominent businessman and disgraced
newspaper tycoon, Robert Maxwell. I told her my name is Jenna pointing
to my nametag on my shirt and offered her a cold or hot beverage, as
those were my instructed duties at work. She accepted a tea and went on
to chat a bit about this rich guy that she worked for and she knew off-
hand that he was looking for a massage therapist. Just doing me a good
deed out of her kindness of her heart, 1’m sure, she offered to introduce
me to him. I declined her first proposition, thinking out loud, told her I
didn’t know the body well enough to even attempt an interview. She
didn’t seem worried at all by my fear of incompetence saying that if he
liked me enough he would get me the best training in the industry.
Ghislane thought I had a cheery persona and fit the quota for what he was
looking for and as she put it an enthusiastic learner that she said she
gathered from the sticky notes popping out of the various sections in my
book. | accepted her phone number and the house address and told her I
will call her if | am able to come over after work. I rushed over to the
tennis courts where my dad was working and told him of the news. We
both thought this could be a wonderful opportunity to get my
accreditation in massage therapy. Seeing that it was a lady in her late
thirties who came off as more of a nurturer rather than a procurer, neither
of us saw any reason to be hesitant.

Chapter 4

At around Five p.m. my dad drove me down to the bottom of “El Brillo
Way.” on the Palm Beach intercostal. We pulled into a short driveway
beckoning a large pink mansion with heavy wooden doors. I was so
excited about this chance and asked my dad to wish me luck. He gave me
a big squeeze and wished me the best. He walked me to the front door
and I rung the door chime. Moments later we were greeted by an older
gentleman dressed in a casual butler uniform. I told him 1 was here to
meet Ms. Maxwell for a massage trial and he opened the doors for my
father and I telling us to wait in the entry as Ms. Maxwell would be on
her way any second, and she was. Down the stairs she walked with a
warm smile, her short black hair seeming very proper and elegant, for
now. She shook my fathers hand and thanked him for bringing me and
kissed us both on the cheeks. They spoke briefly about whom she worked
for and about Mar-a-Lago where we worked. She was in hurry, you could
tell to end the conversation and say good-bye to my dad, which she did so

23

(1 Copyright Protected Material
CONFIDENTIAL GIUFFRE004156

ever pleasantly. She said the boss was upstairs and waiting my arrival, so
with that I said bye to my dad and began to follow Ghislane up the stairs.
I was so nervous, but I didn’t show it. I kept my reserve and demeanor
cool as ice, trying show maturity for the open position. We continued on
to the massage room, passing by a grand crystal chandelier, and a couple
lengthy wooden hall tables displaying a multitude of photos displaying
young girls and beautiful women, trying not to gawk at them I didn’t
even notice that some of those girls were only wearing their smile.

Ghislane asked me how my day at work was and I told her it was easy
peasy as always just trying to make simple conversation. There was a
fork at the end of the staircase and she led me to the right hand side. The
lights were dimmed in the bedroom but I could still see the King Size bed
in the middle of room, we did a U-turn around the bed, which led us into
a massage room. Dripping in luxury I could’ve definitely compared it to
the renowned Mar-a-Lago’s spa’s, it had marble walls and a glass
enclosed shower and self-automated steam room at the very end of the
Burberry carpeted room. There was a large mirror over a basin to the
right of the room with an array of oils, ointments, soaps, and lotions anda
small closed door, which I assumed must be a closet. The only thing that
struck awkward about this room was the naked man laying face down
atop of the turquoise massage table in the center of it. “I had to be
prepared for this,” I told myself. Massage was something | had never
done before so I quickly brushed away my thoughts of possible schemes,
wanting to believe whole-hearted this was going to be legit. Ghislane
introduced us to each other and | proceeded to make his acquaintance.

Looking up at from his downwards position, he looked me over and
gave a smile to Ghislane, an obvious notion of his approval. He was
Jeffrey Epstein as she pronounced for him, as if | supposed to recognize
his name or something. He affirmed, “It was his pleasure” and replied to
just call him Jeffrey, “No need for formalities” he answered, cleverly
putting me at ease. This man did not look like someone to beware of.
Both him and Ghislane appeared to be very nice people and conscious of
their health as their need for massages and spa visits, no alarm bells went
off, yet. I was prepped by Ghislane to “treat this as a lesson from her and
follow her exact lead, if] did good tonight then maybe I would become
Jeffrey’s Travelling Masseuse, seeing the world and getting paid well for
it’. I was very hopeful, a job like this could really make my dreams come
true.

I followed suit and washed my hands with warm water so the coldness
would not shock Jeffery’s naked body, then lathered them in rich bady
butter. Ghislane told me to always keep one hand on Jeffrey, even when
getting more lotion, so it didn’t make him lose concentration on being
relaxed. She gave me a tip and told me to keep a blob of lotion high up on

24

O Copyright Protected Material

GIUFFRLO04 157

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021156
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028137.txt,"/ BARAK / 3

I’d met President Clinton briefly once before, when he received Syrian chief-of-
staff Hikmat Shehabi and me after our Blair House talks in 1994. But the Sharm
conference provided my first opportunity to spend time with him face-to-face.
When Peres and our delegation were about to leave, a Clinton aide approached and
said the President had asked whether I'd like to join him on the flight back to
Israel. Though as surprised as I was by the invitation, Shimon nodded at me to
signal it was okay, so I headed off for Air Force One. I spent most of the brief
flight talking to the President in the office space carved into the middle of the
plane. I would later discover that he quite often tried to engage with foreign
leaders’ colleagues or advisers on overseas trips, and not limit himself to summit
negotiations. It was part of his voracious appetite for information or insights which
he believed were essential to get a rounded understanding of the complexities of
the issues he was trying to address. Still, it was an extraordinarily fascinating 20
minutes. I got my first real look at Clinton’s natural gift for person-to-person
politics, as well as his mastery of both the detail and nuance of Israel’s
predicament, and of the wider conflict in the Middle East. Looking straight at me,
almost never breaking eye contact, he encouraged me to feel I had something of
value and importance to share with him. In fact, he created the impression that I
was the first sentient, intelligent human being he’d ever met. He made no grand
policy statements. Mostly, he asked me questions: what were the prospects of
Arafat reining in Hamas and Islamic Jihad? How were our relations going with
King Hussein? What was my view of the chances of concluding a peace with
Hafez al-Assad, despite his boycott of Sharm al-Sheikh? If Shimon did go on to
win the election, what new diplomatic opportunities could he as president, and we,
exploit in the search for peace? And, finally, what if Bibi won? I dare say this first
meeting was more memorable for me than for the president. But it would turn out
to provide a foundation for our joint efforts, in a few years’ time, to resolve the
very issues we’d talked about on Air Force One.

Though the summit restored a small opinion poll lead for Peres, that merely
reinforced Haim Ramon’s soccer-game strategy. I was more convinced than ever it
was wrong. Haim still wanted to ignore Bibi, but I pointed out that for at least one

289
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028137
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014153.txt,"100
9922 978 Fhe
jeans WiG9 “3 0ze

sewoy,! ‘ZsuUl0p

C) £46
seuepuoxQuseiee

m)9gg2 982 ZEg 1/00

‘ Bead rane A t
+200) AN AN

aL dy pugs a Oee

Apueg ‘upyujod

ue!
$76 OMS Eo uaunbal Lb

‘euipg ApSAeg
OL208 Yi, olay zoek

jaqes| ‘YUISPIOD

ea:

(m) epge 8P6 S09
airy SU af HUBS

vaya ‘beqploo

g60e Egy F 9b 00
2% + €€ OO
HERES ETL L Ep 00
GiL} SOs | Cv 00

) zeae sez-L020
Aya
g punwpa ‘YNoMpUaS

due 198 626 29
(AQF oESy v27 20

alpeyy ‘Sse

~£020
(uboere EStSbuS4
wen soopey eS

Airey anaue|o

yatrjeypp@iwessrvel wew2
gr SOE 140
‘ Midd ‘5 SOE 140

pon] 1wEessnio

Bag Ue, HSeB-LOF
yoreg Wed Ree cis eke
OBOS-215-e1e

LZO0L AN SOA M8)
(ai eg at
paemoH “SHO

wo CIENT DBrogeupe sews

2629 216 LO
(M)S}0L 298 212 80
Ases Buegsuls

(u) 9g90 CES 242 LOO
ewig
g MalpUY “INCLUD

ma) SbZL Sbe-202

{i} aziz Pee 7020
SM vopucy

yaayg aquiooysy Z1

Ape} B ps7 “Plo

(a) ZLpe 062-2020

(a) 9
Boul ange ates Ubipues
. Spewesg
p}oge xog

MOIpPUY “UEHITHS

‘(H) peOd 266-102!
(a bree $80-2020
GAS UOpuUO?}
eMiequed ty

Quod ‘Uasqig

peer arses ——

yI0M, ~
woo peuhor@ureadl etnies
ews
(epee,
xO NVE OLMS “Uopuo?
PEOY Pie) LO
yely Usplesy

eu ‘sqgid

nye
Gates
SAS UNgL ISER OZ

SYD pus ei ‘AeH

£2

(yu) Lese-Lze-2020
(M)S988 S6p-
() 0850 app-2080

ew ‘Anen

reans wiez 3
Sq “JeyH989)

yoo pjd@uoquo yyewsy

GIUFFREOOL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014153
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019671.txt,"The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 183

Moscow that were more embarrassing to America. In June 2015, the
WikiLeaks website released another putative Snowden document,
two years after he had supposedly wiped his computer clean in Hong
Kong. It revealed that the NSA had targeted the telephones of three
consecutive presidents of France—Jacques Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy,
and Francois Hollande.

According to a former NSA official, this document, like the 2013
Merkel material, was not among the data on the thumb drive given
to journalists in Hong Kong, which Greenwald confirmed. Green-
wald suggested to The New York Times that it might have been sto-
len by another penetration in the NSA, presumably one who had
access to the same secret compartments as Snowden in 2013. Since
Greenwald and Poitras had no way of knowing about the documents
that Snowden did not give them, it is equally possible that the Rus-
sian intelligence services obtained this document from Snowden and
later gave it to WikiLeaks. The release on Assange’s WikiLeaks site
came in the midst of NATO war games held near the Russian border,
which Putin had vehemently denounced. The accompanying article

© was co-authored by Assange, who now claimed to have access to ®
Snowden’s NSA material. Because Assange had been in telephonic
contact with Snowden in Hong Kong, and his deputy, Sarah Har-
rison, had spent five months in Moscow with Snowden in 2013, it
is certainly possible Snowden was his source. But it seems difficult
to believe that Assange waited two years before publishing because
he has made it part of his modus operandi to publish documents
immediately. Because WikiLeaks receives documents anonymously
via its Tor software, any party with access to the Snowden files
could have sent it. Subsequently, in July 2016, Assange released via
WikiLeaks a cache of politically disruptive documents from the files
of the Democratic National Committee. U.S. intelligence strongly
suspected they been stolen by the Russian intelligence services and
sent to WikiLeaks. If so, Russia made use of Assange and WikiLeaks
to exploit selected fruits of its espionage activities

Greenwald and Poitras also released belated documents. On
July 15, 2015, their web publication, The Intercept, released a
Snowden document that cited an NSA intercept of an Israeli mili-
tary communication concerning an Israeli raid in Syria on August 1,

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 183 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019671
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012522.txt,"Snsor & Associates

” Reporting and Trenscziption, inc,

Page 8 :

Before you went cver to Jeffrey's house
after you net ii in person, did she tell you if anyone
asked you how old you were, how old you were supposed to
Say you were?

A.

Q. She didn't give you a script and say as
soon as you walk in the house you're supposed to say,
""I'm 18,"" right?

A. No.

Q. And I assume if you were asked, you wanted
to be convincing that you were cver the age of 18,
because you wanted to do the work, right?
A, Right.
QO. By the way, were you ever asked?
Eventually.
Okay.
A. Not the first day, I don't believe.
Q. Okay. Was it Jeffrey or someone else that

asked you whether you were over the age of 18?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012522
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011293.txt,"Esa Origins 7 February 24 — 26, 2017
PROJECT An Origins Project Scientific Workshop
Challenges of Artificial Intelligence:

Envisioning and Addressing Adverse Outcomes

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

4) Al, CYBERSECURITY, AND Al ATTACK SURFACES
Al Attacks on Computing Systems, Devices, Infrastructure (focus)
Manipulation & Disruption of Al Systems

(Contributions by Kathleen Fisher, John Launchbury, Ashish Kapoor, Sean, Shahar, Jeff Coleman and others)

Al will be used in new ways to enhance cyberwarfare. Targets could be either purely computational,
aimed at the bringing down of computing systems, the stealing of stored information, of gaining access
to monitoring activity and information streams. However, we are more likely to see potentially even
more costly attacks involving a combination of cyber and physical systems, e.g., uranium enrichment
plants, automated flight systems, weapon systems, automated driving systems, healthcare equipment,
oil refineries, or the large swaths of the power grid of the US or other countries.

Cyberwarfare is a domain in which the use of Al is inevitable. Attacks and/or responses are likely to
happen at computing rather than human speeds. As soon as one side has autonomous cyber warriors
systems (ACWs), other actors will have to adapt similar offensive or new defensive technologies. Given
this context, imagine building an ACW designed to seek, disrupt, and destroy within high-value
adversary networks and systems. The ACW has to be able to observe network behavior to build
situational awareness, find places to hide, create exploits to pivot to new places, build a map and use it
to navigate complex networks, find high-value information, and identify targets to disable or from
which to extract information.

Because high-value adversary networks are likely to be relatively isolated, the ACW will have very
limited opportunities for external command and control communication, so it will need to make many
decisions in isolation. It will read information it finds, build a model of adversarial intent, and then
invent ways to disrupt that intent.

Establishing the initial access to the high-value network is likely challenging, so the ACW will spawn and
spread to ensure that it can reconstruct itself if an active part is observed and destroyed. The ACW may
also create disguised caches of specific capabilities so that it can construct new mission-oriented
functionality from pieces. It will morph its active form so that defenses will have a hard time finding it.
It will inject itself into trusted binaries so that its behavior is difficult to distinguish from legitimate
applications.

The mission of the ACW will likely be defined in flexible terms because the human handlers will have
only limited information when it is deployed. The ACW will be designed to seek opportunities to
communicate with its human handlers, but it will also be designed to act autonomously if it observes
triggering behavior in the adversary’s systems. It may try to distinguish training states from active
warfare states on adversary systems. The creators of the ACW will have had to trade off the likely
effectiveness of the ACW versus the cost of premature action. Awareness of the adversary’s systems
will necessarily be limited in accuracy because it only gets a worm’s eye view of the network from the

10

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011293
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026235.txt,"please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026235
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010833.txt,"95

93

ovaass 1 for the production had been carefully crafted to keep ores 1 THE WITNESS: Right. No, I mean, I want to
osas? 2 him out of it; in other words, te not produce the orsese 2 make -- I want to make clear that there was a lot
orasso 3 October 2005 version. orse37 3 of information that I was relying on in filing

o1:4503 4 The other thing I -- I began to discover as I orvasao | 4 this pleading, and -- and, of course, the later
o4505 5 started going through some flight logs, Dave Rogers, who | ot42 § pleading. So we are on the subject of flight

oasce 6 is one of I think about three pilots that -- that orgs = 6 logs.

o14s10 «7 Epstein regularly relied on to fly his -- you know, he oraese 7 Flight logs showed that the flight logs

o4st3 8 had very fancy -- to use the technical term ~~ jets. ores «8 Mr. Dershowitz had produced to Detective Recarey
o:4s18 9 There were about -- there were about three pilots there. araeag 9 were incomplete and inaccurate. And so that led
oras:20 10 One of them had some flight logs and that -- orass2 10 to concern on my part that Mr. Dershowitz had had
o4s24 14 «that was Pilot Dave Rogers, if I'm recalling his name ores 11 an opportunity to sanitize the flight logs,

01452 12 correctly. And so later on in the litigation, the sex arses? 12 had -- had -- had provided incomplete production,
o4530 13 abuse litigation against Epstein, flight logs were ovaror 13 you know, obviously, very important production
eas 14 obtained from Dave Rogers, and it was possible to -- to oraro2 14 that the Palm Beach Police Department was looking
014537 15 compare -- I'm sorry. I don't mean to -- I want to make = | o1a70s 15 at.

ovas4o 16 sure I get -- you know, the question is: How much can I oraros 16 Then we got some additional flight logs from
o14542 17 remember and I'm trying to make sure I get -- get it all orzo 17 Dave Rogers. And what those flight logs

orasee 18 in. oraz 18 showed -- first off, let's talk again about

or4sas 19 And so the flight logs were produced from orarta 19 the -- the production of those flight logs.

orasaa 20 Dave Rogers. And so Dave Rogers produced some flight oraz? 20 My recollection is that Dave Rogers's flight
014551 21 logs, and some of the flights that he produced logs for or4a7.21 21 logs were provided by Bruce Reinhart who was a
oss 22 coincided with the logs that Mr. Dershowitz had provided | 01472 22 former Assistant U.S. Attorney who had been
a145s9 23 to the Palm Beach Police Department, and there were orarze 23 inside the Southern District of Florida Office at
o4s01 24 inconsistencies, And so that, again, aroused my orar20 24 a time when the Epstein case was the subject of
oveos 25 suspicion that maybe Mr. Dershowitz when he had -- oraraz2 25 regular discussion in that office.

ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400

ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
(954) 331-4400

94 96

oraeos 4 MR. SCOTT: I just got a call from a lawyer oraras 1 And then he had gone to work for some kind of
orasog 2 on the screen. His -- his phone is not working, ora7as | 2 a -- a law firm or private operation that was
oreo «3 Epstein's lawyer, Darren Indyke. orarag 3 located adjacent to Mr. Epstein's business. And
oreo | 4 MR. SIMPSON: Why don't -- oraraa 4 so, now, Reinhart, who appeared to be being paid
overs = 5 MR. SCAROLA: Do you want to take a break for orvazas | 8 by Mr. Epstein, and certainly was adjacent to
onaerz 6 a second? oraras § & Mr. Epstein's business office, was producing
ores «7 MR. SIMPSON: Well, why don't -- well, why avast 7 these flight logs.
ose? 8 don't we Jet him finish his answer? orarse 8 So that, again, aroused suspicion that the
oreta | 9 MR. SCAROLA: Let him finish the answer. ovarsa 9 flight logs that were being produced would have
014620 10 MR. SCOTT: Yeah, let's do that. You're o1a7s7 10 been sanitized or inaccurate.
oras:20 14 right. orarsa 11 But even -- I mean, you know, I think the
0146.21 12 MR. SCAROLA: Although it may take a while. ovaso0 12 problem with -- you know, you can't sanitize
ovse2 13 THE WITNESS: It -- it's, I mean, the orasioz 13 everything. That would be too suspicious. And
oven, 14 question -- or:as04 14 so what -- what was -- was -- what was evident on
oras21 15 MR. SCAROLA: Yeah. But let's -- oraaor 15 these flight logs was, for example, approximately
ore2s 16 MR. SCOTT: I don't care. oraats 16 ten flights by Mr. Dershowitz with Tatiana has --
01:05:25 17 MR. SCAROLA: Okay. Let's -- let's go ahead ovata 17 has been discussed; with Maxwell; with Jeffrey
oe27 18 and finish. orasz1 18 Epstein. One of them had one female, which,
ora627 19 MR. SCOTT: Let's go ahead and finish the oraa2s 19 again, in the context that I was looking at,
orse-20 20 answer. We heard this much. or4a27 20 seemed to be a potential code word for
aras2e 21 MR. SCAROLA: Good. Thank you. or4e28 21 underage -- underage girl.
arasze 22 THE WITNESS: Okay. So there -- o1aa32 22 And so those flight logs showed, you know,
ores 23 MR. SCOTT: I don't want to break him ona 01:48:35 23 again, close association and travel with --
o14632 24 roll. or4eaa 24 with -- with -- with Mr. Dershowitz, and
oras33 25 MR, SCAROLA: Thanks. orasar 25 Mr. Epstein.

ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS

(954) 331-4400 (954) 331-4400

10/20/2015 01:07:28 PM Page 93 to 96 of 151 24 of 38 sheets

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010833
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022339.txt,"11/19/02 Aftermath of the mid-term elections and the AMT; estate tax issues; inflation-adjusted 2002-20
numbers for 2003

10/25/02 Run-down on proposed legislation: the CARE and NESTEG bills; next year’s FICA; 2002-19
low 7520 rates and planning: QPRTs, CLATs, CRATs, GRATs and charitable gift

annuities

09/20/02 Possible permanency of 2001 Tax Act and its education provisions;“decoupling’: 2002-18
D.C., Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York

09/04/02 Treasury ends “abusive” split-dollar scheme (Notice 2002-59) 2002-17

08/29/02 CBO’s budget numbers and stimulus proposals; IRA discussion correction — comment 2002-16
from Cathy Vohs of the IRS

08/01/02 CARE Act progresses — proposed gifts to charity from IRAs 2002-15
07/23/02 Corrections on IRA discussion; single life distribution table 2002-14
07/18/02 Corrected discussion on the final minimum distribution regs 2002-13
07/02/02 The debt limit increase; IRS retreats from imposing FICA or FUTA taxes on ISOs 2002-12

(Notice 2002-47)

06/21/02 Attempts to make 2001 Tax Act permanent; efforts at estate tax reform; law-school 2002-11
expenses not deductible (Galligan); ignorance of the law is no excuse — “innocent
spouse’ relief denied (Mitchell)

05/24/02 The “sunset” provision of the 2001 Tax Act; new IRA distribution tables 2002-10

04/18/02 Thoughts on 529 Plans; IRS issues final rules on IRA distributions; “decoupling”: 2002-09
Maryland, Nebraska and New York

04/09/02 Tax Court denies annual exclusion for gifts of LLC interests (Hack/); Florida says 2002-08
goodbye to estate tax revenues

03/20/02 Senate Finance Committee hearing on tax shelters; Joint Committee on Taxation 2002-07
report on shelters and judicial doctrines used against them

03/15/02 Stimulus bill passes; bill to freeze some of 2001 Tax Act; CBO and OMB revenue 2002-06
projections; Concord Coalition suggestions about fiscal year 2003 budget; GRAT
includibility under IRC Sec. 2039 (TAM 200210009); Vermont “decoupling”; the GST
and “indirect” skips — the opt-out

02/28/02 Tax shelter amnesty (Announcement 2002-2); whither the corporate income tax?; IRS 2002-05
permits early CRUT termination (PLR 200208039) and tax treatment of early
termination (PLR 200127023); IRS information on Victims’ Relief Bill (Publication
3920); New York City’s cigarette tax

02/22/02 President Bush's fiscal year 2003 budget; Senate vote on estate tax repeal; the 2002-04
shrinking surplus; increase in debt ceiling; taxability of frequent flyer miles

(Announcement 2002-18); cigarette taxes

Tax Topics — Table of Contents — 2013 — 10

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022339
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019117.txt,"eaten, Sh

AutHor’s Note

conducted by Connolly’s Vanity Fair colleague Vicky Ward, we
began to put the pieces to gether.

In a few instances, we have re-created brief scenes and
snatches of dialogue. These are based on interviews, police
investigation documents, and court filings. We changed the
names and identities of the girls, hoping to protect them from
more embarrassment and harm.

There never was any doubt that Jeffrey Epstein was guilty. He
admitted as much in the non-prosecution agreement he agreed
to sign in 2007. The question is, what exactly was he guilty of?

This book attempts to answer that question and many others
about this strange and mysterious man. These days people all
around the world are angry about and suspicious of the super
rich and powerful. The story of Jeffrey Epstein is an object lesson
about why we ought to be. To put it simply, some people think
they can operate outside the law. And that’s what they do.

—James Patterson, Palm Beach, February 20, 2016

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019117
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027562.txt,"Time? 12
Flags: 1

Is Read:

/07/18 01:52:43 PM
060865

Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 2D!

Message:

E10499-A7AF-46A9-A

(5659

Yes

Sender: iy

Time: 12
Flags: 1

Is Read:

Is Invitation: No

123-63 )

E49-O0CA67F956962

/O7/18 01:53:54 PM (565912434)
126401
Yes

GUID: 2779ADF3-FAAC-—496E-8E00-34E0135B861E

Message:

Tell him I agree:

Sender: iy

Time: 12
Flags: 1

Is Read:

/07/18 01:54:16 PM
060865

Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: CFD01081-3CO0OE-4AC7-8AF5

Message:

=],

:: French throwdown tomorrow

(5659

Barr a disaster for t

Time: 12
Flags: 1

Is Read:

/07/18 01:54:39 PM
060865

Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 5SB4A39

Message:

(5659

12456)

EFD37596C222

he agenda

12479)

E4-B5C8-42DF-893F-CFC54F574908

Classy move on tillerson

Time: 12
Flags: 1

ITs Read:

/07/18 02:05:22 PM
060865

Yes

Is Invitation: No

(5659

Is122)

GUID: 4C498C95-1D7B-4D/A-B9FC-1AC844E7E4F6

Message:

I heard Jacques Lang good guy

Time: 12

Flags: 1

/07/18 02:05:37 PM

060865

(5659

L313 /)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027562
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021630.txt,"Accomplishment Report Date Prepared

(Accomplishment must be reported and loaded into . Date Loaded
ISRAA within 30 days from date of accomplishment) Date Loader’s Initials

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

1, Used, but did not hetp 3. Helped, substantially
\s/€-MM1- 168 C62! 2. Helped, minimally 4. Absolutely essential
For Sub. Invest. Assist. by other FO(s) indicate A, B, C, D for corresponding FO

IAT
[ren esses | Il cavcrvicae| —_ al
So ore
ss Fo ra

Computer Fraud/Abuse
Corruption of Public Official [1
Money Laundering

Sub Invest Asst by FO(s)

[Fait |_|
ics

Polygraph can [crisis Neg-Fed)__|
search werent] (ME Heo-Loea| |
| Fsocass | [mewto-ro |_|
IB ech. Antu, froo-rro |
Fi ton.-1o ||
[tat Gi.cxam| | _[uco-coupn|  mNenraitabex| |_|

J. Civil Rico Matters Date:
Also complete ""Section G""

Other Civil Matters Date:

Assat Forf Prag

:

Rate FO IAT Rate FO

F. Conviction
(]Federal [JLocal [[] Intemational
Conviction Date:

A. Complaint / information/ indictment

[JFederal ([JLocat {International
Complaint Date:

Check if Civil Rico Complaint O Subject Description Code *(——)* eigen °
Judicial Outcome. OX
Information Date: For 6F, G, H-Include Agency Gane Amount $
Indictment Date: = id or 5 na Suspension: Years Months.
Plea or Trial

B. Locate / Arrest State: Judicial District: K. Administrative Sanction Date:

[Federal [Local [J International - . Subject Description Code
; | G, U.S, Code Violation Type: Length:
Subject Priority: OA OB (1c Required for sections A, B, F and J Suspension [[] Permanent
Locate Date: (Federal Only) Debarment or
Arrest Date: Titte Section # Counts Injunction Year. Months

(] Subject Resisted Arrest
(1 Subject Arrested was Armed

L. Asset Seizure Date:.
Asset Forfeiture Date:
CATS # Mandatory

Circle below one of the three asset forfeiture:
Admin, Civil Judicial, or Criminal

C. Summons Date:
(Federal ([) Local

. Recovery / Restitution / PELP X
(0 Federal DJLocal [J International
Recovery Date:

Code * v Amount $

Code ° ¥ Amount $

Restitution Date:

Do not indicate $ value in Section D

H. Sentence Date:

Sentence Type: . M. Acquittal/ Dismissal/ Pretrial Diversion

t '

(Circle one) Date:

In Jail: Years, Months.

Suspended: Years_____. Months_____m_ N. Drug Seizures Y Date:

(Court Ordered [J Pretrial Diversion Probation: Years, Months__. Drug Code ® :
Code * yY Amount $ Fines: $ ro Code
BEL PDAS . Do nat indicate $ in Section D
Code*__ v= Amount $ |, Disruption/Dismantlement: ¥

m

. Hostages(s) Released Date:

: Disruption Date:
Released by: [] Terrorist (J) Other

0. Child Victim Information
Child located /identified Date:_O of opey

Prriving (7) Deceased

Dismantlement Date:

Number of Hostages:
Completion of FD-515a Side 2 Mandatory

P, Subject Information - Required for all blocks excluding block D (Recovery/PELP), blocks E, I, Land N
| a 7 | Race | sex | __ fateofsitn Social Security No. (if available)
a a ee eee

Fort

Subject¥6lated to an LCN, Asian OrgantzeqCrime (AOC), Italtan Organized Cnme (IOC), Russian/Eastern European, Caribbean, or Nigerian Organized Crime Group -
Complete FD-515a, Side 1 Blocks A-E magdatory, F-H as appropriate,

Subject related to an OC/Drug organizatoh, a VCMO Program Nalionat Gang Strategy target group, or a VCMO Program Nationat Priority Initiative targel group -
Complete FD-515a, Side 1 Blocks A-C only,

x Additional information may be added by attaching another form or a plain sheet of paper for additional entries. petal Nout FD-918

e See codes on reverse side, |_ s—sisiszr

v Requires that an explanation be attached and loaded into ISRAA for recovery over $1 m and PELP over $5 m, disruption, dismantlement, and drug seizures.

8/E-MU- [08062 - 2a

be
b7C

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021630
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015162.txt,"get drunk and screw in the tent outside that party, | never woulda had to
go to that fuckin’ Republican convention with your parents, who hate my
ass off but they pretend we’ re one big happy family.

BRISTOL: Oh, c’ mon, if my mother gets elected--like | wasn’ t
planning to live in Washington, D.C.-- but it’ Il be fun. Please, don’ t be
such a grouch.

LEVI: You saw my MySpace page. | mean everybody’ s seen it.

“I’ ma fuckin’ redneck who likes to snowboard and ride dirt bikes.”
I' m too young to get married. I’ m trapped. | was just minding my own
business, and suddenly my whole fuckin’ //feis destroyed.

BRISTOL: Look, | don’ t wanna argue with you any more. Let’ s just
see what’ s on TV.

[Levi reaches for the remote control and clicks on the TV.]

DAVID LETTERMAN: Here’ s good news, ladies and gentlemen. The
Palin family crisis has been solved now, and today the baby is being
adopted by Angelina Jolie.

LEVI: Boy, | sure wish that was true. | never wanted to have kids.

BRISTOL: Please, this is not exactly a picnic for me. Let’ s just see
what else is on.

[Click!]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015162
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033215.txt,"From: Purevsuren Lundeg [iii

Sent: 1/14/2017 1:13:48 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Meeting in Europe

Importance: — High
Dear Jeff,

Happy New Year! I could visit you in Paris on January 21st or 22nd or 23rd. Which day is convienent for you?
I will arrive noon time to see only you and after the meeting leave back. Early after noon time is suite for me.

warmest,
Purev
Sent from my iPad

On Dec 18, 2016, at 11:17 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/29/us/politics/document-Trump-Inaugural-Benefit-
Packages.html?mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=A A614B76E88085F22C999B2AC0241763&gwt=pay

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033215
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024301.txt,"Bannon joins a growing list of political figures associated with President Trump who have
been confronted in public in recent weeks.

Protesters in Kentucky followed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to his
car while he was leaving a Louisville restaurant on Saturday, threatening to vote him out of
office.

Others, including White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Department of
Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, also have been confronted by protesters for
their association with the Trump administration and its policies.

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024301
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031862.txt,"29

therefore, generally poor. The area to its north, Asia Minor, is heavily
mountainous. Syria cannot project power to the north except with
great difficulty, but powers in Asia Minor can move south. Syria's
eastern flank is buffered by a desert that stretches to the Euphrates.
Therefore, when there is no threat from the north, Syria's interest —
after securing itself internally — 1s to gain access to the coast. Its
primary channel is directly westward, toward the rich cities of the
northern Levantine coast, with which it trades heavily. An alternative
interest is southwestward, toward the southern Levantine coast
controlled by Israel.

As can be seen, Syria can be interested in Israel only selectively.
When it is interested, it has a serious battle problem. To attack Israel,
it would have to strike between Mount Hermon and the Sea of
Galilee, an area about 25 miles wide. The Syrians potentially can
attack south of the sea, but only if they are prepared to fight through
this region and then attack on extended supply lines. If an attack is
mounted along the main route, Syrian forces must descend the Golan
Heights and then fight through the hilly Galilee before reaching the
coastal plain — sometimes with guerrillas holding out in the Galilean
hills. The Galilee is an area that is relatively easy to defend and
difficult to attack. Therefore, it is only once Syria takes the Galilee,
and can control its lines of supply against guerrilla attack, that its real
battle begins.

To reach the coast or move toward Jerusalem, Syria must fight
through a plain in front of a line of low hills. This is the decisive
battleground where massed Israeli forces, close to lines of supply, can
defend against dispersed Syrian forces on extended lines of supply. It
is no accident that Megiddo — or Armageddon, as the plain is
sometimes referred to — has apocalyptic meaning. This is the point at
which any move from Syria would be decided. But a Syrian offensive
would have a tough fight to reach Megiddo, and a tougher one as it

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031862
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017573.txt,"WORLD
WATER WEALIN
WOMEN WASTE

WAR WELL-BEING

WILDLIFE WEB
WEATHER

WIND WORDS

WONDER WITNESS

WILDERNESS WORK

WUNDERLUST

WARMING

WIZARDRY

WISDOM WIT

fs THE WAKING

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017573
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016443.txt,"In May 2006, Recarey drew up probable cause affidavits, charging Epstein, two of
his assistants and one recruiter with sex-related crimes. Instead, Krischer took
what Recarey said was the unusual step of referring the case to a state grand jury.
Epstein was indicted in state court on a minor charge of solicitation of
prostitution.

Recarey said Krischer told him he didn’t believe Epstein’s accusers, and only two
of them were called before the state grand jury investigating the case — even
though police had lined up more than a dozen girls and witnesses at that time.

Believing that the case had been tainted, Reiter — that same month, May 2006 —
took a very public stance against Krischer, writing a letter, which was released to
the news media, calling on Krischer to remove himself from the case. The chief
then referred it to the FBI, which opened its own investigation in July 2006, FBI
records show.

Reiter said he was effectively blackballed in some Palm Beach circles as a result
of going over Krischer’s head, and their relationship, once strong, would never be
the same.

Reiter has no regrets about what he did.

“There are challenges here that don’t exist in a lot of other places because of the
affluence in the community, but the only way I could approach this case was that
none of that matters. The truth is still the truth. The facts are the facts.
Everybody is treated the same.”

In the years that followed, several of the victims obtained lawyers and filed civil
lawsuits against Epstein. About two dozen lawsuits were filed, starting in 2008.
The early cases were particularly brutal for his victims, the court records show.

The girls faced fierce grilling from another pack of Epstein’s civil attorneys, who
questioned them about their boyfriends, drinking, drug use, social media posts,
their parents and even their medical histories.

One girl was asked about her abortions, and her parents, who were Catholic and
knew nothing about the abortions, were also deposed and questioned.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016443
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013172.txt,"256 13 Local, Global and Glocal Knowledge Representation

13.4 Knowledge Representation via Attractor Neural Networks

Now we turn to global, implicit knowledge representation — beginning with formal neural net
models, briefly discussing the brain, and then turning back to CogPrime. Firstly, this section
reviews some relevant material from the literature regarding the representation of knowledge
using attractor neural nets. It is a mix of well-established fact with more speculative material.

13.4.1 The Hopfield neural net model

Hopfield networks [Hop82] are attractor neural networks often used as associative memories. A
Hopfield network with N neurons can be trained to store a set of bipolar patterns P, where
each pattern p has N bipolar (+1) values. A Hopfield net typically has symmetric weights with
no selfconnections. The weight of the connection between neurons ¢ and j is denoted by wi;.
In order to apply a Hopfield network to a given input pattern p, its activation state is set to
the input pattern, and neurons are updated asynchronously, in random order, until the network
converges to the closest fixed point. An often-used activation function for a neuron is:

yi = sign(p; S- wisys)
JFi
Training a Hopfield network, therefore, involves finding a set of weights w,; that stores the
training patterns as attractors of its network dynamics, allowing future recall of these patterns
from possibly noisy inputs.
Originally, Hopfield used a Hebbian rule to determine weights:

P
Wig = Spi;
p=l1

Typically, Hopfield networks are fully connected. Experimental evidence, however, suggests
that the majority of the connections can be removed without significantly impacting the net-
work’s capacity or dynamics. Our experimental work uses sparse Hopfield networks.

13.4.1.1 Palimpsest Hopfield nets with a modified learning rule

In [SV99] a new learning rule is presented, which both increases the Hopfield network capacity
and turns it into a “palimpsest”, i-e., a network that can continuously learn new patterns, while
forgetting old ones in an orderly fashion.

Using this new training rule, weights are initially set to zero, and updated for each new
pattern p to be learned according to:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013172
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022311.txt,"54040

Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations

provision, it did not include two
additional provisions that the Board
declared were necessary to prevent
“unlawful encouragement of union
membership.” The Court disagreed,
stating

Perhaps the conditions which the Board
attaches to hiring-hall arrangements will in
time appeal to the Congress. Yet, where
Congress has adopted a selective system for
dealing with evils, the Board is confined to
that system. National Labor Relations Board
v. Drivers, etc. Local Union, 362 U.S. 274,
284-290, 80 S.Ct. 706, 712-715, 4 L.Ed.2d
710. Where, as here, Congress has aimed its
sanctions only at specific discriminatory
practices, the Board cannot go farther and
establish a broader, more pervasive
regulatory scheme.182

Congress in Section 8(a)(1) aimed its
sanctions only at employer actions that
interfere with the exercise of Section 7
rights. By this rulemaking, my
colleagues go farther and establish a
broader, more pervasive regulatory
scheme that targets employer inaction,
or silence, as unlawful interference. As
Local 357 instructs, they lack the
authority to do this.183

American Hospital Association v.
NLRB, 499 U.S. 606 (1991) (AHA), upon
which the majority heavily relies,
illustrates a valid exercise of authority
under Section 6. In AHA, the Supreme
Court unanimously upheld the Board’s
health care unit rule, finding that
Section 6’s general grant of rulemaking
authority “was unquestionably
sufficient to authorize the rule at issue
in this case unless limited by some
other provision in the Act.” Id. at 609-
10 (emphasis added). The Court further
found that the rule was clearly
consistent with authority under Section
9(b) to make appropriate bargaining unit
determinations. It specifically rejected
the argument that language in 9(b)
directing the Board to decide the
appropriate bargaining unit “in each
case”’ limited its authority to define
appropriate units by rulemaking.

Congress expressly authorized the
Board in Section 9(b) to determine
appropriate bargaining units and the
Board exercised its rulemaking
authority to promulgate a rule
“necessary to carry out’ Section 9(b). In
contrast, as previously stated, there is
no reasonable basis for finding that a
rule making it unlawful for employers to
fail to post and maintain a notice of
employee rights and selected illustrative

182 365 U.S. at 676.

183 My colleagues attempt to distinguish Local
357 as limited to an interpretation of Sec. 8(a)(3)
and 8(b)(2)’s prohibition of discriminatory
practices. That may have been the issue before the
Court, but I do not view the quoted rationale as so
limited.

unfair labor practices is necessary to
carry out any substantive section of the
NLRA. Nevertheless, the majority
construes AHA as an endorsement of
deference to the exercise of Section 6
rulemaking authority whenever
Congress did not expressly limit this
authority. This is patently incorrect. “To
suggest, as the [majority] effectively
does, that Chevron deference is required
any time a statute does not expressly
negate the existence of a claimed
administrative power * * *, is both
flatly unfaithful to the principles of
administrative law * * * and refuted by
precedent.” Railway Labor Executives’
Ass’nv. National Mediation Bd., 29
F.3d 655, 671 (D.C.Cir.1994) (citation
omitted). Were courts “‘to presume a
delegation of power absent an express
withholding of such power, agencies
would enjoy virtually limitless
hegemony, a result plainly out of
keeping with Chevron and quite likely
with the Constitution as well.” Id.

In sum, the majority’s notice rule does
not address a gap that Congress
delegated authority to the Board to fill,
whether by rulemaking or adjudication.
The Supreme Court has made clear that
“Tw]here Congress has in the statute
given the Board a question to answer,
the courts will give respect to that
answer; but they must be sure the
question has been asked.’’ NLRB v.
Insurance Agents’ Int’] Union, 361 U.S.
419, 432-433 (1960). The Supreme
Court also has made clear: ‘‘[Congress]
does not * * * hide elephants in
mouseholes.” Whitman v. American
Trucking Associations, 531 U.S. 457,
468 (2001).

My colleagues’ action here is
markedly like the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) regulation rejected as
ultra vires by the court of appeals in
Am. Bar Ass’n v. FTC, supra. The FTC
issued a ruling that attorneys engaged in
certain practices were financial
institutions subject to the privacy
provision of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act (GBLA). Upon review of the
detailed statutory scheme at issue, the
court found it ‘difficult to believe that
Congress, by any remaining ambiguity,
intended to undertake the regulation [of
a subject] * * * and never mentioned
[it] in the statute.” 430 F.3d at 469. The
court further opined that to find the
FTC’s interpretation to be ‘‘deference-
worthy, we would have to conclude that
Congress not only had hidden a rather
large elephant in a rather obscure
mousehole, but had buried the
ambiguity in which the pachyderm
lurks beneath an incredibly deep mound
of specificity, none of which bears the
footprints of the beast or any indication
that Congress even suspected its

presence.” Id. No such conclusion was
possible in that case. No such
conclusion is possible here. Quite
simply, the Board lacks statutory
authority to promulgate a rule that
imposes a new obligation on employers
and creates a new unfair labor practice
to enforce it.

The Rule Is Arbitrary and Capricious

Even if the Board arguably has
rulemaking authority in this area,
deference is unwarranted under
Chevron and the Administrative
Procedure Act if the rule promulgated is
“arbitrary or capricious in substance, or
manifestly contrary to the statute.”
United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S.
218, 227 (2001). Also see AHA, 499 U.S.
at 618-20 (applying arbitrary and
capricious standard in its consideration
of the Board’s rule on acute care
hospital bargaining units). “Normally,
an agency rule would be arbitrary and
capricious if the agency has relied on
factors which Congress has not intended
it to consider, entirely failed to consider
an important aspect of the problem,
offered an explanation for its decision
that runs counter to the evidence before
the agency, or is so implausible that it
could not be ascribed to a difference in
view or the product of agency
expertise.” Motor Vehicle Mfg. Ass’n of
the U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto.
Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983). “[Tlhe
agency must examine the relevant data
and articulate a satisfactory explanation
for its action including a ‘rational
connection between the facts found and
the choice made.’ ”’ Id. (quoting
Burlington Truck Lines v. United States,
371 U.S. 156, 168 (1962)). See also
Business Roundtable et al. v. S.E.C.,—
F.3d—, 2011 WL 2936808 (D.C. Cir.,
July 22, 2011) (finding SEC acted
arbitrarily and capriciously by relying
on insufficient empirical data
supporting its rule and by completely
discounting contrary studies).

In AHA, the Board’s health care
bargaining units rule was supported by
“the extensive record developed during
the rulemaking proceedings, as well as
its experience in the adjudication of
health care cases during the 13-year
period between the enactment of the
health care amendments and its notice
of proposed rulemaking.’’ AHA, 499
U.S. at 618. The Supreme Court upheld
the validity of the rule finding it ‘“‘based
on substantial evidence and supported
by a ‘reasoned analysis.” Id. at 619
(citing Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass., 463
U.S. at 57).

By contrast, the majority’s articulation
of the need to mandate that employers
violate Section 8(a)(1) unless they post
a notice of employee rights is not based

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022311
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028952.txt,"lifelong learners. These materials include short form videos such as this one on Robert Pinsky’s
“Shirt” (as featured in The New Yorker), and, this spring, the sixth module of the free seven-part
Poetry in America MOOC, which has registrants in over 150 countries.

Growing rapidly, and outpacing our current staff and infrastructure, Poetry in America has a
fundraising goal this year of 2.5 million dollars to fund its expanding group of projects. We’ve taken
a big step, hiring the design agency Threespot to help us develop our web presence. Our
website— to launch early 2016— will eventually serve as an online hub for our TV show and
educational projects. We hope you'll join us then for a virtual launch!

Finally, Jeffrey, you have been such a wonderful supporter of my Poetry in America project. The
Leon Black gift changed everything for me last year. It paid salaries for staff | desperately needed
to complete projects (detail below), but first and foremost, it gave me leverage, enabling me to set
down a Solid Harvard base for my activities by giving the school something to point to: this public
humanities project among the list of projects the Dean supports. The money did it: as soon as they
heard about the gift, they took my project more seriously. Because of that gift, the Faculty of Arts
and Sciences, which is space-stingy, found and rewired a studio space for me to house my video
production operation and team. That gift woke up the Deans to the importance of Harvard's role in
producing the highest quality humanities content for the WORLD, and not just for Harvard
students. My main employee has half of her salary paid with these funds, and the foundation of our
collection for PBS LearningMedia is being made with this support. This gift represented one of the
most consequential shifts of the last year, allowing me create content and launch projects this year
that make future projects that much more likely. If | can keep this base sturdy at Harvard, refilling
these coffers, | will be that much more able to keep working.

| am also so grateful for the help you gave me in defining my project for Templeton, and, what help
you have offered to give in bringing them around. | have, since Templeton turned me down, gotten
funding to produce video on two of the poems I'd proposed to Templeton and to create, and test,
that video in schools as | proposed. One of my partners in that project is Success Academy, where
| could also expand my work with Templeton. And there are still other poems that may satisfy their
character criteria more fully, including the third of the poems Id originally proposed and that Joe
Biden had agreed to discuss with me (on parenthood and humility). At this point, I’m gaining the
platform and the name recognition to be an effective spokesperson for the foundation on building
literacy and character in the schools.

It really means a lot to me, all financial help aside, Jeffrey, that you are rooting for me and thinking
about me. You push back a lot (as Larry does), and it’s always annoying but | always learn.

With abundant gratitude,
Lisa

Elisa New

Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature
Harvard University

148 Barker Center

12 Quincy Street

Cambridge, MA

02138

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028952
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029494.txt,"Business Expansion Portfolio and Prospectus
Twin City Care of The Virgin Islands
19

Utilities
wars Tid

Annual Total $28,800.00

Office Supplies

Printing Advertising $125.00/week $500.00

——

ee :

Direct Mail | S20.00wee | | _ $80.00 |

Advertising jsiso.0vmweek | | $600.00 |

Website Advertising / Hosting | $150.00week | =| (8600.00 |

Promotional Materials | $375.00/Month | «| 81,500.00 |
Annual Total

ee ee
ee ee

Vehicle License x 6

Vehicle Ins. X 6 Pa

Staff

. $
Educaton/Month 6,000.00 iithcare LF — Sahn
. $ $
Wage/Taxes/Benefits/Month | 1 430,000.00 ay 4 1,430,000.00
$
| Aumulali Totals 3 years 4,296,000.00

Staff Uniform

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029494
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016645.txt,"TAMPA BAY DESALINATION FACILITY

@ 25 mgd plant

é Co-located with
power plant

é 8.5-acres for WIP

é Provides 10% water
demand for region

é Screening, filtration,
RO membranes,
chemical systems

é AWS funding
provided

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016645
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022758.txt,"helping them to navigate the ambitions of their wealth. They’ve satisfied
their business dreams. Now there are the separate challenges and
possibilities of their actual wealth. If they had big dreams before, it’s
nothing to what they can have now.

In essence, as Epstein becomes more of a public figure the response to
this description of his livelihood, is, in the media and in high social circles,
“bullshit.” True, there is no clear alternate narrative. No one is accusing him
of anything, accept, sometimes, guilt by association. (In addition to Robert
Maxwell, who will be accused of fraud, there’s Steven Hoffenberg, briefly a
New York high flyer, who went to jail for a Ponzi scheme, for whom
Epstein acted as a consultant—along with, he points out, Paul Volcker.) But
the characterization persist: if it’s not clear, 1t must be murky. Sure,
Goldman Sachs partners and tech geniuses, they might have stratospheric
wealth, but what to make of a Coney Island, Zelig-like no-namer?

In 1994, just at the moment when Prince Charles is on television
acknowledging his love for Camilla Parker Bowles, Jeffrey Epstein is sitting
with his arm around Princess Diana at a dinner at the Serpentine Galley in
London (Diana is wearing her “revenge” dress that evening). Graydon
Carter, into his second years as editor of Vanity Fair, is also at the dinner.
Epstein’s rise and Carter’s rise are not, with a little critical interpretation,
that different. Both are a function of the age of new money, both are helped
by strategic relationships with the exceptionally wealthy (1.e. they are social
climbers), both men have made themselves up. To say that Epstein, in the
company of the Princess, sticks in Carter’s craw would be a big
understatement. Epstein becomes one of the “what do you know about him”
figures in Carter’s gossip trail—a story waiting to happen. A variety of the
gossip that begins to circulate about Epstein—for instance, that he secretly
films his guests—is seeded by Carter, who once advised me not to go to
Epstein’s house or accept a ride in his car least I risk being blackmail. (“For
what?” I asked Carter. “You can’t even begin to imagine,” said Carter.)

Epstein is playing a cat and mouse game with his own growing wealth
and influence. He is private and secretive, but grandly so. He joins the board
of Rockefeller University. He’s suddenly on the Trilateral commission, that
cabal of business people who fancy themselves, and who are fancied by
conspiracy buffs, as running the world. He buys from his client Limited
Founder Les Wexner the larges private house in Manhattan. (Rumors will
continue for many years, that Wexner owns the house and Epstein is just
squatting in it—an 18-year squat.) He buys an airplane. He buys another. He
expands his holdings in New Mexico. He begins a Zanadu refurbishment of
his Caribbean Island.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022758
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021618.txt,"FD-515 (Rev. 12-19-06) Accomplishment Report Date Prepared
Squad supervisor approval (Accomplishment must be reported and loaded into Date Loaded
(please initial) ISRAA within 30 days from date of accomplishment) Date Loaders Initials

Investigative Assistance or Technique Used

Fite Number 1. Used, but did not help 3. Helped, substantially
D 2. Helped, minimally 4. Absolutely essential
nee = For Sub, Invest. Assist. by other FO(s) indicate A, B, C, D for corresponding FO
ugitive
Bantruptey Fraud a aT Rate FO Rate FO aT Rata FO IAT

aT
[Proto cover | MMcimnisint ase |
[crisis Neg Feel |

Computer Fraud/Abuse Oo
Corruption of Public Officiat 1
Money Laundering

Sub Invest Asst by FO(s)

a
[aicanasst |||

Computer

| [onsen on

|O Wanted Flyer

CART

Vict-Witn Coor

Fest FOR) eA eS] pr [essunrrice | [I sonen wera! — ese io
LE EE SSC Son Soe Soo

Sc
Y | “ me Swat Team mm
© PRM Leoats asst. [PRM tech. Aazcuin| |
|__| Evid. Purchase] A Phone Tot Reo|
[| Jwewieie | —|__[veo=croupt | fm Fo: tena cst |_|

[126.0 Exam] | _[uco-croueit] — flifvonraitavex| | |

J. CivilRico Matters Date:
Also complete ""Section G""

Other Civil Matters Date:

Sav - ITC

[ree
Yd

F, Conviction
(Federal []Local [1] Intemational

Conviction Date:

A. Complaint / information/ Indictment

(Federal ([JLocal [1 Intemational
Complaint Date:

Check If Civil Rico Complaint C1 Subject Description Code *(__)* SLE eee
Forde 28, Hepehuenk Sed Judicial Outcome___.§. ____ OX
information Date: Or Oh. rieineluee Agency Vo ° Amount $
Indictment Date: = Felony or 5 MISAEMeanGr Suspension: Years Months___
Plea or Trial

B. Locate / Arrest State: Judicial District:

C] Federat ([JLocat [{(] International :
Subject Priority; OOA (1B Cc

K, Administrative Sanction Date:
Subject Description Code ®
Type: . Length:

G. U.S. Code Violation

Required for sections A, B, F and J Suspension [[] Permanent
Locate Date: (Federal Onty) Debarment or
Title Section # Counts Injunction Year. Months

Arrest Date:
(1) Subject Resisted Arrest
(2) Subject Arrested was Armed

L. Asset Seizure Date:.
Asset Forfeiture Date:
CATS # Mandatory.__ESE
Circle below one of the three asset forfeiture:

Admin, Civil Judicial, or Criminal

C. Summons Date:

(Federal [J Local

. Recovery / Restitution / PELP X
[Federal [Local [International
Recovery Date:

Code * vy Amount $
Code*__ sv) Amount $

Restitution Date:

Do not indicate $ value in Section D

H. Sentence Date:

Sentence Type: PY M. Acquittal/ Dismissal/ Pretrial Diversion

(Circle one) Date:

In Jail: Years Months_____

Suspended: Years___._.__. Months______ N. Drug Seizures Y Date:

(1) Court Ordered] Pretrial Diversion Probation: =“ Ysate Mentha. Drug Code © .
Code*__ v= Amount $ Fines: § ot Code
PELP Date: Do not indicate $ in Section D
Code * v Amount $ |, Disruption/Dismantlement: Vv

E. Hostages(s) Released Date:

Disruption Date:

Released by: [1] Terrorist [] Other

O. Child Victim Information
Child located / identified Date: Oey ofroy

Phriving (CO Deceased

Dismantlement Date:

Number of Hostages:
Completion of FD-515a Side 2 Mandatory

P. Subject information - Required for all blocks excluding block D (Recovery/PELP), blocks E, |, Land N

Ls

Subject related to an LCN, Asian Gfganized Crime (AOC), Italian Organized Cnme (10C), Russian/Eastern European, Carlhbean, or Nigerian Organized Crime Group -
Complate FD-515a, Side 1 BlockgA-E mandatory, F-H as appropriate.

Subject ralalod to an OC/Drug organization, a VCMO Program National Gang Strategy targal group, or a VCMO Program National Priority Iniliative target group -
Complate FD-515a, Side 1 Blocks A-C only.

x.Additional information may be added by attaching another form or a plain sheet of paper for additional entries. petial No: of ho Sle

= Sau colleen eames Bea, [

v Requires that an explanation be attached and loaded into ISRAA for recovery over $1 m and PELP over $5 m, disruption, dismantlement, and drug seizures,

GVE-UK — 108062- 199

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021618
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031692.txt,"In this piece --- http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-
society-friends-close-ranks/ ---

I read:

The crowd at the events top publicist Peggy Siegal has organized for Epstein proves the point, at least behind closed doors. ""I and
many others that know him describe him as brilliant,"" says Siegal.

""His unique mind is what attracts the world's smartest people to his home."" Last September, with Siegal's help, Epstein hosted a Break
Fast after Yom Kippur. A group of 120 friends brought their children over for a buffet dinner

This was just a few months after he finished his prison obligations in Florida.
And here he is, entertaining --- with children present.

This Break Fast is one of a number of social events involving post-prison Jeffrey that attracted celebrated, powerful people.
Of course I have zero idea who said, ""NO WAY"" and didn't cross his doorway.

My questions are:

1) I You have known him for decades, were/are friends, etc.

Why was your reaction to his crimes to continue being his friend --- and not in a covert way?
2) What would he have had to do for you to shun him --- to cut him out of your life?

You're the ultimate professional; you may not want to respond.

Especially because I'm NOT reaching out to anyone else who's named in the piece.

I don't care about them.

But it ain't me to blindside you.

JK

On Apr 30, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Peggy Siegal wrote:

Would love to talk to you. What is piece about? Peg
----- Original Message -----

From: Jesse Kornbluth

To: Peggy Siegal

Sent: Sat Apr 30 15:38:06 2011

Subject: from Jesse Kornbluth

Peg ---

As you've seen, I'm doing a piece for the Times.
You're briefly in it.

I'd like 3 minutes of your time, if possible.

Turning it in late Sunday....

We could do this by email.
Or phone.

I'm at
If I'm out, my cell is

THANKS

JK

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031692
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020506.txt,"47

many with some kind of government linkage underscores the need for vigilance in
enforcing a stricter code of due diligence and transparency on the part of university
administrations and faculties.

Pressure on University Administrations

There are a large number of successful exchange programs between American and
Chinese universities. Three US universities have developed campuses in China (Johns
Hopkins, Duke, NYU), more than one hundred universities participate in cooperative-
education programs in China, and countless US faculty members participate in
collaborative projects with Chinese colleagues (principally in the sciences). These
relationships have not been easy to establish or maintain, but they have generally
been successful. A 2016 report by the Government Accounting Office, which reviewed
the cooperative programs of twelve American universities, found that the universities
“generally indicated that they experienced academic freedom,” while noting that

self- and internet censorship remains a problem.

In recent years, the outlook for these collaborations has deteriorated in line with
broader restrictions on academic freedom on Chinese campuses. In 2013, and
commensurate with CCP Central Committee Document No. 9, universities were
reportedly instructed to avoid discussing topics including “universal values” and civil
rights,?” and admonitions against teaching of Western values have continued. Since
2017, foreign university collaborative institutions have been required to institute
Communist Party committees and place a Party secretary on their management
boards.*8 In July 2018, the Ministry of Education ended 234, or one-fifth, of its
international university partnerships. More than twenty-five programs with
American universities were among them.”

The Chinese government has demonstrated a penchant for turning to these
collaborations as points of leverage when US universities have hosted the Dalai

Lama or held other events deemed politically sensitive or offensive to the Chinese
government. In such instances, existing collaborative exchange programs have been
suspended or put on hold, planned visits of university administrators have been
canceled, programs between university institutes and centers have been suspended,
and Chinese students wishing to study at these US institutions have been counseled
to go elsewhere. Such punitive actions resulting from campus visits by the Dalai Lama
have been taken against Emory University, the University of Maryland, the University
of California-San Diego, and others. In the case of the University of Maryland, which
hosted the Dalai Lama in 2013, there was temporary fallout, and then following the
2017 graduation incident the Chinese government again halted cooperation, seriously
damaging one of the most extensive exchange programs with China.

Section 4

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020506
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024329.txt,"Table of Contents

GROSS PROFIT 52 NET LOSS AND 13.0%
PER UNIT EBITDA MARGIN
$1339 EX-GIFT

205 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Lot “Corr BET LOSE ICL GT) a DEST DA MASCOT

a one-year total shareholder return of 71.1%, significantly outperforming our peer group companies (see “Competitiveness of our
Compensation Program” below) as an index as well as the S&P 500 and S&P 500 Retailing Indices.

1-Year Tetal Sharehelder Return

Lerrete Ser $00 (ir)

SURP ele Bunading iukentep [EID Cartas Beer Groep

KEY COMPENSATION DESIGN AND DECISIONS TO LINK PAY AND PERFORMANCE

Underlying our executive compensation program is a strong belief in promoting a pay-for-performance culture. We accomplish this by linking

a significant portion of the compensation of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, to our performance. In addition, the
Compensation and Nomination Committee seeks to set challenging threshold and target performance levels that reflect our rapid growth trajectory and
business plans rather than goals based on prior years’ achievements. For each of the metrics used in our performance-based compensation plans, payouts are
eared based upon outstanding performance as measured against pre-established financial objectives.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We endeavor to maintain sound executive compensation policies and practices, including compensation-related corporate governance

standards, consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. The following summarizes our executive compensation and related governance policies
and practices:

=2] -

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024329
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026654.txt,"Dhabi

AGT was responsible for installing a “unique civil surveillance network in Abu Dhabi that means ‘every person
is monitored from the moment they leave their doorstep to the moment they return to it,’” according to the noted

security publication MiddleEastEye.<http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uae-israel-surveillance-2 104952769>
The invasive system is dubbed “Falcon Eye”.

Kochavi also owns Israeli security and private intelligence firms 3iMind and Logic Industries. Like Vocativ,
3iMind claims to use “the deep web” to mine information, though in 3iMind’s case it provides spy services, not
journalistic ones. 31Mind even advertises online that it will spy on “the planning and execution of violent civil

unrest” for clients.<https://www.3i-mind.com/use_cases/political-social-unrest/>

The website for Kochavi’s mother company<https://www.agtinternational.com/about/>, AGT, claims its current
business is using “Internet of Things” technology for entertainment and “fashion” applications in partnership
with the giant talent agency WME-IMG ... though it’s unclear what any of these applications really
are<http://www.curoleague.net/final-four/berlin-2016/news/1/6vokoibj5fsgqg4q/heed-the-event-platform-based-
joint-venture-between-wme-img-and-agt-international-makes-first-official-foray-into-sports>, and certainly
what value they provide for entertainment. Security experts say Internet of Things type sensors could be tied
together to monitor crowds for security purposes.

According to Israeli and U.S. Jewish publications, the lines within Kochavi’s companies can blur, with Vocativ
employees doing work for 3iMind and Logic, and vice versa. So who was this “journalist” arrested amid the
unrest on Inauguration Day? Was he actually doing journalism? Or, as some journalists around town have been
asking, could he also have been doing surveillance of anti-Trump demonstrators on behalf of an Arab or Israeli
client, possibly a foreign government?

[http://heatst.com/wp-

content/uploads/2017/01/aaeaaqaaaaaaaag Saaaajdq3mjuxmegu2ltgSnjmtndilmelhzmrhltllyjkynze5zjlimg.jpg?w
=300]Kochavi employee Evan Engel (LinkedIn)

A call to Ruemmler was returned by someone identifying himself as a Vocativ spokesperson. He told Heat
Street that the arrested employee, Evan Engel, was doing purely journalistic work at the time he was detained.

“The arrest, detainment and rioting charge against journalist Evan Engel who was covering the protests for
Vocativ are an affront to the First Amendment and journalistic freedom,” the spokesperson said. “Vocativ will
vigorously contest this unfounded and outrageous charge.”

Kochavi has taken pains to put a different face, unrelated to spying and surveillance, on his American activities.
Vocativ acts like a news organization, though it’s made little splash (and gets remarkably little web
traffic<http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/vocativ.com>) for an operation so large and expensive.

Kochavi has also shown little hesitation to pay top dollar for access to the most powerful figures in America to
provide legitimacy for his American activities. Last fall’s Wikipedia data dump revealed that he and his
longtime business partner, New York rainmaking lawyer Mary Edelman, offered Bill Clinton millions of dollars
to serve as honorary chairman of the company that would become Vocativ. <http://heatst.com/biz/wikileaks-
bill-clinton-turned-down-8-million-to-be-honorary-chairman-of-news-site-vocativ/> Clinton turned them down,
perhaps nervous about Kochavi who’s been described as “a mysterious even somewhat shady character” and the
Israeli “version of the old-fashioned arms dealer with a suit and an MBA” by the progressive Jewish blog
Tikkun Olam.<https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2014/12/04/israeli-cyber-security-merchant-peddles-wares-
secretly-in-united-arab-emirates/>
[http://heatst.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/akochavivivian.jpg?w=260]Matania Kochavi (C) shown with
Vivian Schiller (L) chair of Vocativ’s executive committee and Danna Rabin (R) AGT’s chief operations
officer.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026654
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022980.txt,"-
Sex Slavery lawsuit links Trump’s
Mar-a-Lago to pedophile ring: report

NOOR AL-SIBAI
04 MAY 2017 AT 16:45 ET

Jeffrey Epstein (left, via YouTube screengrab) and President Donald Trump (right, via Creative Commons)

DON'T MISS STORIES. FOLLOW RAW STORY!

Last fall’s allegations of sexual assault against President Donald Trump failed to stop his
presidency, but one of the more explosive of those allegations is once again making headlines.
POLITICO reported that a new lawsuit reveals details linking Trump to billionaire
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender. The reports indicate that one lawsuit
contains information about Virginia Giuffre who alleges that she met Epstein while working as
a towel girl at Mar-a-Lago when she was 15 before being recruited into “sexual slavery”.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022980
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025714.txt,"Message: Can you have one of your boys send Trump@war.
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
Time: 08/18/18 06:06:37 AM (556290397)

Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

OB842F96-B7DB-446A-9180-C7B4EC2828E6

GUID:

Message: I suggest kudlow point to strength of dollar
the the worry on tariffs.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/18/18 06:07:44 AM (556290464)

Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No

E2867F22-333E

ft

GUID: 41 F4-B833-C654ECFBFAIA

Message:
completion to that on the world stage

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/18/18 06:08:00 AM (556290480)

Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

Gl
O

TJAOCLICC7-3FFF-4D69-9D7A-6D426F4D011

GUID:

Message: competition”

Sender:

Time: 08/18/18 06:31:49 AM (556291909)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No

793FOEAF-627C-4CB6-90B4-5DC82080CD3])

Gl

GUID:

Message: Yes

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 08/18/18 05:22:38 PM (556330958)

Flags: 1150981
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No

GUID: 20C104B5-73CA-4536-96D4-CAD3DD875562

Message: Im going to Europe sept 3

#

In the uncertain future people want a stable economy ,

if easy

Market up. in the face of

and there is no

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025714
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023446.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by

return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023446
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025072.txt,"light-green arrow sagging off of a nearby
post.

No one lives at the end of the road, which
is every bit as wavy and disorienting as the
adjoining highway. It empties into a scene
that seems engineered for maximum
bewilderment: three high-rise cranes,
topped with fluttering Palestinian flags,
tower over massive stone and concrete
building frames. Cement-mixers, painted
the same shade of light green as the arrow
at the turnoff and marked with the project's
logo -- a wiry oval with a cute little convex
loop at the end, like a child's drawing of a
heart that could also be a tree -- line up to
receive material from a buzzing, state-of-
the-art plant. The construction site, a
couple turns up-road of the cement factory,
is swarming with workers in green
hardhats. Spotless SUVs with the Rawabi
logo on the door speed from one side of the
site to another.

Rawabi, which will be the first Palestinian
planned city in the West Bank, runs from
the top of the mountain to the valley below,
with its highest point sitting at an elevation
slightly higher than Ateret, which is now
constantly visible. In contrast, the chaos of
Ramallah, stronghold of an insolvent and
sclerotic Palestinian Authority, feels distant
in more senses than one.

Rawabi represents something totally new --
a visionary Palestinian-directed private

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025072
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023320.txt,"direction by eileen and ada , and then brad. His breakdown was not a surprise after months and moths of
warnings. Though disabled, he ran your office this year. with john and joe. He ran amok, and as i told
you he rarely failed to remind me in our conversations that you told him that he works for you and not for
me and that brad needs to pays him .

. Asking me who to hire , estate attny tax people etc. :
I have taken heat for years over the fact that 1 gave you no more than carlyns name, . no follow up
questions no interactions , not even one single question asked of me re her work. (that was Eileen _) but
somehow carlyns fuck up was my doing. . _ when i told you that i thought Eileen wasn't up to the task, you
bellowed. that i was talking out of both sides of my mouth. . You told me this year , that by trying to protect
you from crazy joslin, I had in essence fired him and it was my responsibility to do his work. it then turns out
that he didn't consider himself fired at all he just received less money. and continued to make a really
dangerous mess.. Joshn castrucci, in your eyes, was also my doing , though email after email said , I take no
responsibility for him,and 1YOU SHOULD NOT HIRE HIM |!!! , your response was that was my opinion
was only because i didn't trust him. then to add insult to injury last jan you told me he was gone. however he
too is still there, and a waste of money and space.

My time is complicated by Donald's potentially eviscerating any reason for anyone to use the foreign
funds repatriation plan that 1 had put together. . however as you are aware I have some decisions to make re
my time allocation in the next year or two. so at least for a few weeks I am unable to commit much time and
make any future plans to guide you in the redoing of your procrastination produced mess.

That being said, the tasks at hand are the following.

You have a bomb of colored string that your retarded children have formed , It has to be very carefully
unwound , even the substitution of Barry for your next trustee, needs a careful focus on procedure.s It would
be much preferable if Wechsler was not his replacement. do you have any person you trust ??!. Iam
concermed re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn
ACCURATE .. org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are alla part. Barry will need 2 months
to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,

a way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing
requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into
new plan. . ""XXXXX"" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat
sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years over due. . an accounting system. fire john
.. Joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced with
new. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock
sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you
CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! _ this will be very detailed work. . a self
inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need
3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you
know. He will need to be trained. note
; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im glad
that you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the fact that after
only one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a year or more.

I expect as a friend you will understand that

I will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long
overdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul
weiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, , no one. needs toend.. you and I had
previously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be fair I can
not say im surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of money, you
wont want to pay , so limit itto 40m per year. - water under the bridge

If I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as Ihave said, I hope
you understand that it now will have to be under my standard terms and conditions. and well documented so as
to avoid any more of the he said she said. I never want to have any more uncomfortable money moments with

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023320
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014532.txt,"Outlook

Investment Management Division

Half Full

—_ x Py ee ed ll ri

“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective...
¥ >
Attributed to Marcus Aurelius

Investment Strategy Group | January 2017

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014532
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022226.txt,"From: Al seckel 
Sent: 12/16/2010 1:27:48 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Results 
Importance: High 
ok. Just FYI, your detractors are on a rampage against you this past week.... Mike is trying to take care of it (NO! 
there is no extra charge) it comes with the territory. 
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
To: Al seckel < 
Sent: Thu, December 16, 2010 5:20:13 AM 
Subject: Re: Results 
over the weekend. 
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Al seckel <______________________1> wrote: 
My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, 
and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse 
that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, 
they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wiki page 
any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and 
so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo 
what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back 
and push them back down. 
Then, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and 
org sites. 
I spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, 
which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had 
people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In 
addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I 
end up having to do it myself What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head... 
We were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. This was 
NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs 
down considerably. 
I must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that? 
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com> 
To: Al seckel <aseckel@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM 
Subject: Re: Results 
I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then 
another 10. then another 10. . 
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Al seckel <aseckelgyahoo.com> wrote: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022226 
Jeffrey, 
The hots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article 
left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to 
move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on 
a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the 
top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word 
to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE 
did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep 
it prominent. 
Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now 
removed. 
Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head 
lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, 
Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your 
wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful 
editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, 
and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. 
We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google 
search. 
We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. 
And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, 
especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add 
new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped 
down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push 
Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google 
search are not of your mug shot, etc. 
Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to 
depromote you. 
As far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you 
have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, 
and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major 
work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input 
and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers 
need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have 
not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers. 
You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 
balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, 
and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there. 
This needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 
very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022227 
Search Results 
1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  
- 9 visits - Dec 2 
Jeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953 in Coney Island, New York) is a Jewish-American 
financier and philanthropist. Epstein was raised in Coney ... 
Philanthrophic Work The Epstein Foundation - Promotion of Scientists 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein - Cached - Similar 
2. Images for jeffrey epstein  
- Report images 
3. Jeffrey Epstein I Profiles in Science  
- 4 visits - Nov 3 
Jeffrey Epstein presents some of the greatest minds and finest scientists working today. 
www.jeffreyepsteinscience.com/ Cached 
4. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery  
He's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, 
socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. 
nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n 7912/ Cached - Similar 
5. Edge: JEFFREY EPSTEIN  
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN is a money manager and science philanthropist who currently serves as the 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Financial Trust ... 
www.edge.org/3rd culture/bios/epstein.html - Cached - SimilP, 
6. The Plastic Surgeon: Jeffrey Epstein I Full of Crop  
Dec 9, 2010 ... Dr. Jeffrey Epstein is an internationally known reconstructive surgeon, known for 
exhibiting the highest standards in the medical field. 
fullofcrop.com/2010/12/09/the-plastic-surdeon-jeffrey-epstein/ - Cache 
7. Jeffrey Epstein, MD, FACS, Miami, New York Hair Transplant Surgeon  
Dr. Epstein and the hair transplant surgeons at the Foundation for Hair Restoration are experts in 
the field of hair restoration. Dr. Epstein is one of the ... 
www.foundhair.com/pades/about.shtml - Cached - Similar 
8. Jeffrey Epstein, Convicted Pedophile And Former Hedge Fund Titan ...  
Jul 21, 2010 ... Jeffrey Epstein, the former hedge fund manager who pleaded guilty to soliciting an 
underage girl for prostitution, is now free of the ... 
www.huffinotonpost.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-disgraced_n_654674.html - Cameo 
9. Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, MD, FACS I Board Certified Plastic Surgeon ...  
Dr. Jeffrey Epstein has been in solo private practice in Miami since 1994, and New York City since 
2005, and is a Clinical Professor at the University of ... 
www.justformenplasticsurgery.com/AboutDrEpstein.asp - Cached - Similar 
10. Jeffrey Epstein on Sports  
An old school look at today's sport's world focusing on professional basketball and football 
byJeffrey Epstein. 
www.jeffreyepsteinsports.com/ - Cached 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022228 
11. Jeffrey Epstein I Philanthropy  
Jeffrey Epstein has three main philanthropic and charitable organizations he uses to fund arts, 
sciences, research and other causes. 
www.jeffreyepstein.org/ - Cached 
--
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
--
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022229 
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032645.txt,"communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032645
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013614.txt,"Octahedral Air people intellectualize objectively in confident and insensitive
aloofness. Those symbolized by cubic Earth are realistic and practical, a what-you-
see-is-what-there-is belief along with rigid, materialistic ways. /cosahedral Water
types experience emotions strongly and are sensitive, intuitive, nurturing and can be
overly sensitive and dependent.

What intuitions and observations relevant to self, subjective and objective,
emanate from the stylistic properties of feelings as derived from a time series of
observations of their associated actions suggested by their statistical measures, Hr,
Hu, AC and srs? The yield is rich and unexpected. We find an enjoining of values of
these measures, characteristic and invariant for each person, with the brain and
behavioral actions of entheogenic agents and Zen meditation in contrast with
worldlier focused attitude adjusting experiences and drugs. The range of their
potential values helps rationalize a person’s inclinations along the continuum of
attachment and detachment. This quantifiable dimension augers positively and
negatively with respect to the requirements for mystical experience as poetically
described by the ambivalent warrior prince, Ardjuna, in conversations with Lord
Krishna in the Bhagavad-Gita, the most famous and influential component of the
Mahabharata of Hindu scripture, A similar theme relevant to the occupancy of a
propitious range of values for the measures, H7, Hy, AC and srs, is found in what is
often called the Second Nobe/ Truth as explained by the Buddha, Siddhartha
Gautama, in lectures recorded in a deer park near Benares. We begin with the
results of some drug experiments conducted by behavioral neurophysiologists and
end with suggestions about the intuitive relevance of the conceptual content of
these measures to the universals of mystical experience and perhaps to elements
of spiritual transformation.

As described previously, the brain and behavioral process of habituation is
characterized by a decrease in the strength of an observable response to the
repetition of an evocative stimulus. Imagine the decrease in our startle responding
when a once unexpected loud noise continues to occur. Sir Charles Sherrington,
the early Twentieth Century British pioneer in neurophysiology showed that animals

and humans gradually stopped the withdrawal of their limbs with stimulation of its

114

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013614
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659.txt,"The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 171

Snowden’s supporters do not accept that he stole such a large num-
ber of documents. According to Greenwald, the NSA vastly exagger-
ated the magnitude of the theft in order to “demonize” Snowden.
Snowden also disputed the magnitude of the 1.7 million number. He
told James Bamford of Wired in early 2014 that he took far fewer
than the 1.7 million documents that the NSA reported were com-
promised. He offered, however, no more specific details on the mag-
nitude of his theft. Nor did he offer Bamford any way to verify his
assertion other than to say that he had purposely left behind “a trail
of digital bread crumbs” at the NSA base in Hawaii so that the NSA
could determine which documents he “touched” but did not down-
load. A government official familiar with the investigation said no
such “bread crumbs” were found by the NSA.

It is possible that the NSA Damage Assessment team under Led-
gett falsified its findings or otherwise inflated the number of doc-
uments that Snowden stole. NSA executives might have also lied
to Congress to exaggerate the loss. But why would these officials
engage in an orchestrated deception that made them look bad? Exag-

© gerating the magnitude of the theft would only magnify Ledgett and ©
the NSA’s failure in its mission to protect U.S. secrets.

Officials had no reason to demonize Snowden for legal reasons.
He already had been. Greenwald and Poitras had already revealed
that Snowden had given them a vast number of NSA classified docu-
ments ona thumb drive that revealed, as Greenwald put it, the “blue-
prints” of the NSA. This drive contained, it will be recalled, no fewer
than 58,000 highly classified documents. In the eyes of the law, that
constituted an unprecedented breach of the laws passed to protect
communications intelligence. In any case, in Russia Snowden was
not in any jeopardy, no matter how many documents he was said to
have stolen. Interestingly, the thirty-five-page Defense Intelligence
Agency’s damage assessment reports that 900,000 Pentagon docu-
ments compromised by Snowden were not made public. That was
only disclosed via a Vice magazine Freedom of Information request
in June 2015.

Many of the putative 1.3 million documents that the NSA says
were copied and moved were duplicate copies. Others were outdated
or otherwise useless routing data. So the quantity does not tell the

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 171 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019659
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016325.txt,"Forget clockwork analogies; our brains are closer to a system of canals and locks, with
signals traveling like water from one state to another.

As I sit here typing, I’m actually seeking equilibrium states in an n-dimensional
topology of gradients. Take just one: heat. My body temperature is higher than the air
temperature, so I radiate heat, which must be replenished in my core. Even the bacteria
in my digestive tract use sensors to measure sugar concentrations in the liquid around
them and whip their tail-like flagella to swim “upstream” where the sugar supply is
richest. The natural state of all systems is to flow to lower energy states, a process that is
broadly described by entropy (the tendency of things to go from ordered to disordered
states; all things will fall apart eventually, including the universe itself).

But how do you explain more complex behavior, such as our ability to make
decisions? The answer is just more gradient descent.

Our Brains

As miraculous and inscrutable as our human intelligence is, science is coming around to
the view that our brains operate the same way as any other complex system with layers
and feedback loops, all pursuing what we mathematically call “optimization functions”
but you could just as well call “flowing downhill” in some sense.

The essence of intelligence is learning, and we do that by correlating inputs with
positive or negatives scores (rewards or punishment). So, for a baby, “this sound” (your
mother’s voice) is associated with other learned connections to your mother, such as food
or comfort. Likewise, “this muscle motion brings my thumb closer to my mouth.” Over
time and trial and error, the brain’s neural network reinforces those connections.
Meanwhile “this muscle motion does not bring my thumb close to my mouth” is a
negative correlation, and the brain will weaken those connections.

However, this is too simplistic. The limits of gradient descent constitute the so-
called local-minima problem (or local-maxima problem, if you’re doing a gradient
ascent). If you are walking in a mountainous region and want to get home, always
walking downhill will most likely get you to the next valley but not necessarily over the
other mountains that lie around it and between you and home. For that, you need either a
mental model (i.e., a map) of the topology so you know where to ascend to get out of the
valley, or you need to switch between gradient descent and random walks so you can
bounce your way out of the region.

Which 1s, in fact, exactly what the mosquito does in following my scent: It
descends when it’s in my plume and random-walks when it has lost the trail or hit an
obstacle.

Al
So that’s nature. What about computers? Traditional software doesn’t work that way—it
follows deterministic trees of hard logic: “If this, do that.” But software that interacts
with the physical world tends to work more /ike the physical world. That means dealing
with noisy inputs (sensors or human behavior) and providing probabilistic, not
deterministic, results. And that, in turn, means more gradient descent.

AI software is the best example of this, especially the kinds of AI that use
artificial neural-network models (including convolutional, or “deep,” neural networks of
many layers). In these, a typical process consists of “training” them by showing them

105

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016325
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018547.txt,"Here's my short answer for those guys: If you know women who are submissive and/or
masochistic in bed, that means those particular women like being submissive and/or
masochistic in bed. It doesn't mean anything else.

You're still here? Ah, well. I figured that wouldn't satisfy. So here's a longer answer:

Firstly, if you're a straight dude, and you're drawing conclusions about ""all women"" based
on the women you get involved with, then stop. Just stop. Even if you have slept with
zillions of women, you don't actually know what all women want, because:

A) Your experience of women is limited to women who got involved with you. You
are screening for certain qualities, sometimes consciously, and sometimes unconsciously
or by accident. If you tend to enjoy the dominant role, for example, or if you use a
dominant style of flirtation, then you could be screening for submissive female partners,
whether you intend to or not.

B) Everyone has biases, including you. I love the old saying: ""When all you have is a
hammer, everything looks like a nail."" If you have a bias towards seeing women as
sexually submissive (and you almost certainly do, because female sexual submission is a
hugely prevalent cultural trope), then you're more likely to see female submission in
places where it does not exist.

C) Women, like people of all genders, are demonstrably varied. You really don't think
non-submissive straight women exist? Why then, it must be so inconvenient when I point
you to the work of blatantly dominant women, huh? It's shocking, I know... next I'll be
telling you that queer and asexual women exist! (Not to mention women who switch
among roles -- from submissive to dominant, from sadistic to masochistic. I primarily go
for submissive masochism, but still, I myself play for both teams.)

The thing is, though... no matter how many holes I can poke in these dudes' anecdotal
""data,"" I can't bring myself to worry like they do. Even if a brilliant, well-reviewed study
came out tomorrow and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that 100% of women are
submissive masochists in bed, I wouldn't care. (I bet you my left ear this study will never
happen, but I'm just saying, even if it did, I wouldn't care.)

Let me say it really clearly: Even if most women are submissive masochists in bed
(and I'm not convinced most women are), there's nothing wrong with that. I don't
care.

Why don't I care? Because all this anxiety and argument about submission -- and in
particular, what it means for women to be submissive; whether all women are
submissive; whether women are ""inherently"" or ""biologically"" submissive; whether
BDSM is an orientation or not... this is all the wrong question.

I'll note that the research seems to indicate that more kinky women are submissive than
dominant. Of course, this doesn't necessarily indicate anything about the tastes of women
who don't identify as kinky. And it's probably biased by culture, in that everything from
fashion photos to romance novels emphasizes female submission and male dominance.
Within BDSM culture, female dominance and male submission are often disappeared,
much to the justified frustration of actual female dominants and male submissives. When

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018547
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019881.txt,"AUTHOR’S NOTE

The reason to write this book could not be more obvious. With the inauguration of Donald
Trump on January 20, 2017, the United States entered the eye of the most extraordinary
political storm since at least Watergate. As the day approached, I set out to tell this story in
as contemporaneous a fashion as possible, and to try to see life in the Trump White House
through the eyes of the people closest to it.

This was originally conceived as an account of the Trump administration’s first
hundred days, that most traditional marker of a presidency. But events barreled on without
natural pause for more than two hundred days, the curtain coming down on the first act of
Trump’s presidency only with the appointment of retired general John Kelly as the chief of
staff in late July and the exit of chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon three weeks later.

The events I’ve described in these pages are based on conversations that took place
over a period of eighteen months with the president, with most members of his senior staff
—some of whom talked to me dozens of times—and with many people who they in turn
spoke to. The first interview occurred well before I could have imagined a Trump White
House, much less a book about it, in late May 2016 at Trump’s home in Beverly Hills—
the then candidate polishing off a pint of Haagen-Dazs vanilla as he happily and idly
opined about a range of topics while his aides, Hope Hicks, Corey Lewandowski, and
Jared Kushner, went in and out of the room. Conversations with members of the
campaign’s team continued through the Republican Convention in Cleveland, when it was
still hardly possible to conceive of Trump’s election. They moved on to Trump Tower with
a voluble Steve Bannon—before the election, when he still seemed like an entertaining
oddity, and later, after the election, when he seemed like a miracle worker.

Shortly after January 20, I took up something like a semipermanent seat on a couch in
the West Wing. Since then I have conducted more than two hundred interviews.

While the Trump administration has made hostility to the press a virtual policy, it has
also been more open to the media than any White House in recent memory. In the
beginning, I sought a level of formal access to this White House, something of a fly-on-
the-wall status. The president himself encouraged this idea. But, given the many fiefdoms
in the Trump White House that came into open conflict from the first days of the
administration, there seemed no one person able to make this happen. Equally, there was

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019881
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030622.txt,"From: Fred Haddad 
Sent: 10/19/2013 12:10:27 AM 
To: Tonja Haddad Coleman 
CC: Darren Indyke Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]; Debbie Fein 
Subject: Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Privileged - Redacted 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM, Tonja Haddad Coleman < > wrote: 
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Sharon Churcher • 
Date: October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT 
Cc: Nick Pyke >, Liz Hartley < 
Subject: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley 
Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Sirs: 
We are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial 
and the witness list which names 
victims of Mr Epstein. 
and other young women who allege they were underage 
Mr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their 
claims. 
Ms further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and 
instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter. 
She claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of 
entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact 
information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records. 
May we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET. 
Yours sincerely, 
Sharon Churcher 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030622 
The Mail on Sunday (New York office) 
Ph: 
or 
This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which 
may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee 
(or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you 
received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. 
Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry St, Kensington, London, W8 5TT. 
Registered No 84121 England. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030623 
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033193.txt,"From: Richard Kahn 
Sent: 11/15/2016 9:31:51 AM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Donald Trump Is Picking His Cabinet. Here's a Shortlist. - The New York Times 
Importance: High 
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/politics/donald-trump-administration.html?_r=0 
Richard Kahn 
HBRK Associates Inc. 
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor 
New York, NY 10022 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033193 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013600.txt,"distributions of neuronal interspike intervals have increasingly /ong tails. Contrary to
the behavior of a normally distributed observable, the larger the series of neuronal
spike observed, the more likely that a longer interspike interval than had been seen
before will occur. Counter-intuitively, long intervals tend to be followed by more long
intervals as more shorts follow short intervals. Manic attacks cluster in time as does
a number of other brain and body diseases. Maybe it is intuitively obvious that bad
stuff tends to cause more bad stuff and good stuff is self-propagating. Having
suffered recently does not mean fate owes you one. The brain’s syncopated

segmentations of time can be translated into a creatively arrhythmic dance.

What makes neurologizing conversations like these about subtle human
experience possible are the human subjective scenarios we have agreed to short
hand with names of brain parts and neurochemicals. The how is where conceptual
connection is filled with post 19'° Century Spanish microscopic neuroanatomist,
Santiago Ramon y Cajal-like, intuitions about the functional role of brain structures:
we think motor automaticity and pacing when hearing the brain place names such
as caudate, putamen and cerebellum; we think limbic lobe when musing about
sexuality, rage and depression; we short hand /eft versus right hemispheric places
for verbal and sequential versus intuitive and geometric shape cognition; we point to
the frontal lobe for the future work of executive control, anticipation and paranoia;
the hypothalamus for primitively expressed appetites and to the brain stem for our
vital functions such as breathing and blood pressure. With respect to the brain
juices, we say dopamine for aggressive activity, norepinephrine for attention and
sensory discrimination and serotonin for hunger, mood and sexual inclination. No
matter how avant guarde our experimental techniques such as monitoring local
functional blood supply by fMRI, regional brain glucose utilization maps, time-
dependent changes in_ skull surface voltage using a cap studded with
electroencephalographic, EEG, leads, monitoring these voltage field via their
transverse magnetic fields by the frozen helmets of magnetoencephalography,
MEG, we conclude our work by calling forth named but still enigmatic brain parts
and their juices as mysteriously powerful little men and women executing

remarkably complex and subtle tasks, sometimes even when called upon.

100

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013600
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016197.txt,"﻿Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT 4
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 6 of 6
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022463.txt,"2 The Virgin Islands Daily News

~

Courtney Wild, 30, was a victim of serial sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein beginning at the age
of 14. Epstein paid Wild, and many other underage girls, to give him massages, often having
them undress and perform sexual acts. Epstein also used the girls as recruiters, paying them
to bring him other underage girls. Epstein, 65, a hedge fund manager, splits his time between the

Virgin Islands and Palm Beach, Fla.

VIRGIN ISLANDS

Saturday, December 8, 2018

6 by MIAMI HERALD

Jena-Lisa Jones, with her 18-month-old son, Raymond, says she was 14 when she was intro-
duced to Jeffrey Epstein and was paid $200 by him to give him a massage at his home. Jones

says Epstein told her to take off all of her clothes and that he fondled her during the massage.

Lawmakers issue call for investigation of Epstein deal

By JULIE K. BROWN,
ALEX DAUGHERTY
and CAITLIN OSTROFF
Miami Herald

MIAMI More than two dozen
lawmakers are demanding an inves-
ligation into possible misconduct
by US. Secretary of Labor Alexan-
der Acosta, who, as a former federal
prosecutor in Miami, helped broker a
secret plea deal for a multimillionaire
accused of running an underage sex
trafficking network.

The lawmakers, mostly Democrats,

have sent several letters to Michael E.
Horowitz, inspector general for the
Department of Justice, calling for a
probe into Acosta’ role in the 2008
plea deal for Little St. James resident
Jeffrey Epstein.
Epstein, 65, a hedge fund manager
who splits his time between the Virgin
Islands and Palm Beach, Fla., faced
a possible life sentence for molest-
ing dozens of girls, but was instead
granted federal immunity as part of a
non-prosecution agreement approved
by Acosta when he was U.S. Attorney
forthe Southern Distnet of Florida.

Thus far, 34 senators and members
of the House have called for a probe
of the Epstein case, including two Re-
publicans, Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen,
chairman of the Senate Ju-
ommittee’s subcommittee for
oversight

The requests come one week after
the Miami Herald published an i
vestigation, “Perversion of Justic
that revealed hea federal prosecutors
worked with Epsteins high-profile
lawyers to craft a deal that would keep

him out of prison. Instead he would
serve a bnef jail stint.

Acosta agreed, despite a federal law
to the contrary, that the deal would
be kept from Epstein’ underage vic-
tims unul after Epstein was sentenced,
thereby making it impossible for them
to appear in court and possibly derail
the agreement.

The Herald identified nearly 80
possible victims, most of them 13 to
16 years old. Several of them, now in
thei late 20s and early 30s, told the
Herald that they felt betrayed by Acos-
ta and other prosecutors who failed to
treat them as victims and labeled them
as prostitutes — even though they
were under the age of consent.

Acosta, 49, was confirmed as Presi-
dent Donald Trump's labor secretary
in April 2017. During his hearings,
Sens. Tim Kaine and Patty Murray
questioned Acosta about Epstein’s
deal but Acosta never explained why
he agreed to have it sealed.

He was approved by the Senate,
60-38, with eight Democrats and one
independent voting in favor of his
appointment.

“At the end of the day, based on the

evidence, professionals within a pros-
ecutor's office decided that a plea that
guarantees someone goes to jail, that
guarantees he register (as a sex of-
fender) generally and guarantees other
outcomes, is a good thing,” Acosta
said during his hearings.
f , Acosta over-
ssive federal agency that pro-
sight of the country’s labor
, including human trafficking.

He had been on a list of possible
successors to former Attorney Gen-

The Miami Herald identified nearly 80 possible victims,
most of them 13 to 16 years old. Several of them, now
in their late 20s and early 30s, told the Herald that they
felt betrayed by former federal prosecutor Alexander
Acosta — who now works for the Trump administration
— and other prosecutors who failed to treat them as
victims and labeled them as prostitutes — even though
they were under the age of consent.

eral Jeff Sessions, but was said to have
been eliminated from consideration
after the Herald published its series
online last week.

On Thursday, a group of senators,
led by Murray, the ranking Democrat
on the Senate panel that oversees the
Department of Labor, wrote a letter
to Horowitz, questioning whether Ep-
stein used his connections to not only
secure a lenient sentence, but to obtain
immunity for other people who were
involved or knew about his sexual ex-
ploitation of minors.

“Our justice system is predicated
on the fundamental value that no in-
dividual is above the law, and to that
end, it is essential that plea agreements
involving well-connected individuals
not only follow the law and standard
practice, but also stand up to scm-
tiny,” said the letter, signed by 15 other
members of the Senate,

Rubio on Thursday also called upon
the Justice Department to explain how
such a deal could have happened.

“There should be a little bit more
clanty as to why that case was re:
solved the way it was resolved,"" Rubio

said “Because for most people that
read it, it doesn’t make sense.”

From 2001 to 2006, Epstein as-
sembled a large cultlike network of
underage girls — most of them from
disadvantaged backgrounds —to give
him massages. He then coerced them
into sex acts and paid them to recruit
other girls to bring to his Palm Beach
mansion, three to four times a day, ac
cording to police.

The Herald's examination of thou-
sands of court records, emails and FBI
records also showed that after the deal
was struck, it effectively shut down an
ongoing FBI probe into whether Ep-
stein was trafficking girls and young
women from around the country and
from overseas for sex parties attended
by other powerful people at his man-
sions in New York, New Mexico and
on his private island in the Caribbean,

Federal prosecutors had prepared a
§3-page indictment against Epstem for
federal sex crimes involving minors,
which would have sent him to prison
for decades. The indictment, however,
was shelved, and Epstein was allowed
to plead guilty to two minor prostitu-

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022463

tion charges in state court.

He spent just 13 months inthe Palm
Beach County jail, where he was giv-
en permission to leave most of the day
under a liberal work release program
that wasn't granted to other convicted
sex offenders. He was released in
2009.

Sasse, in his letter, said he was dis-
turbed that federal prosecutors would
have given Epstein such a break.

“The fact that this monster received
such a pathetically soft sentence is a
travesty that should outrage us all,”
Sasse wrote in a letter to DOJ's inspec-
tor general.

Experts say its possible that several
investigations could be launched, not
just by the Department of Justice.

The Deparment of Labor’ nspee-
tor general could also do a review, said
Philip Lacovara, who served as coun-
s¢l to the special prosecutor who in-
vestigated President Richard Nixon's
Watergate scandal.

Neither agency is required to say
if and when it is conducting a review,
he said, so its possible investigations
could already be underway: But the re-
sults may or may not be made public.

“They may do 10 confidential in-
vestigations, but you may only know
about one,” Lacovara said,

Francey Hakes, a former federal
prosecutor, said that such an investiga-
tion could result in policy changes and
new regulations on how federal pros-
ecutors handle victim notification and
non-prosecution agreements,

“T just don’t know of any retrospec-
tive way to fix things,” Hakes said. “I
hope they will get to the bottom of
whatever happened.”

"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018553.txt,"yourself too seriously, and learn to start with a light careful touch when playing with
someone new. Learn to ask for help and guidance, both from others in your S&M
community and from your partners.”

Scootah agreed: ""The first mistake I see newbie doms make is trying too hard to be some
kind of bad ass. Admit your inexperience. Be seen learning. Be modest and have a good
time. Learn to communicate well, and to really be friends with your prospective
partners.""

For me, the bottom line of these conversations is that questioning gender roles, and
understanding gender complications, is an ongoing process. People have a lot of urges
and preferences that are politically inconvenient and which we will never fully
understand. Whether we're shaped by biology or culture, those feelings will still exist for
now, and we have to deal with them. There are ways to do almost anything such that
people respect each other, though -- whatever the implications for gender or power.
Violence is complicated ground, but it can be used in balanced and consensual ways that
end up bonding people together. Fifty Shades of Grey and Fight Club are both examples,
and I haven't even touched competitive sports!

TK OK ok

This can be found on the Internet at:

ABUSE:
[theory] The Alt Sex Anti-Abuse Dream Team

I wrote this post in 2010 for the high-profile feminist blog Feministe. If I were to write it
today, then I would write it differently. In particular, if I were writing it today, then I
would emphasize that there are actually two primary patterns for abusive S&M
perpetrators. There are the ones I emphasized in this post, the ones who prey on
inexperienced people outside the community... but then there's another category:
perpetrators who achieve high status within the community and then use it to get away
with non-consensual things. Other BDSMers have been writing about this more and
more, and the discussion is really heating up right now, in 2012. My fellow feminist
BDSM writer Thomas MacAulay Millar has a particularly long, complex blog series
about patterns of abuse in the BDSM community that gives a lot of great reference links
to other articles on the same topic. I've mentioned Thomas before; I don't always agree
with him, but he's principled and passionate and smart. He blogs at the Yes Means Yes
blog, and the series is being published post-by-post even as I write this. The first post in
the series is available at this link:

http://vesmeansyesblog. wordpress.com/2012/03/23/theres-a-war-on-part-1-troubles-

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018553
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016331.txt,"the future cannot be the same as the past. The universe could even be careening toward a
“heat death,” some far-off time when the total stock of energy had uniformly dispersed,
achieving a state of maximum entropy, after which no further change could occur.

If information gua entropy could not be conserved, then Wiener concluded it was
folly for military leaders to try to stockpile the “scientific know-how of the nation in
static libraries and laboratories.” Indeed, “no amount of scientific research, carefully
recorded in books and papers, and then put into our libraries with labels of secrecy, will
be adequate to protect us for any length of time in a world where the effective level of
information is perpetually advancing.” Any such efforts at secrecy, classification, or the
containment of information would fail, Wiener argued, just as surely as hucksters’
schemes for perpetual-motion machines faltered in the face of the second law of
thermodynamics.

Wiener criticized the American “orthodoxy” of free-market fundamentalism in
much the same way. For most Americans, “questions of information will be evaluated
according to a standard American criterion: a thing is valuable as a commodity for what it
will bring in the open market.” Indeed, “the fate of information in the typically American
world is to become something which can be bought or sold;” most people, he observed,
“cannot conceive of a piece of information without an owner.” Wiener considered this
view to be as wrong-headed as rampant military classification. Again he invoked
Shannon’s insight: Since “information and entropy are not conserved,” they are “equally
unsuited to being commodities.”

Information cannot be conserved—so far, so good. But did Wiener really have
Shannon’s “information” in mind? The crux of Shannon’s argument, as Weaver had
emphasized, was to distinguish a colloquial sense of “information,” as message with
meaning, from an abstracted, rarefied notion of strings of symbols arrayed with some
probability and selected from an enormous universe of gibberish. For Shannon,
“information” could be quantified because its fundamental unit, the bit, was a unit of
conveyance rather than understanding.

When Wiener characterized “information” throughout Human Use, on the other
hand, he tilted time and again to a classical, humanistic sense of the term. “A piece of
information,” he wrote—tellingly, not a “bit” of information—“in order to contribute to
the general information of the community, must say something substantially different
from the community’s previous common stock of information.” This was why
“schoolboys do not like Shakespeare,” he concluded: The Bard’s couplets may depart
starkly from random bitstreams, but they had nonetheless become all too familiar to the
sense-making public and “absorbed into the superficial clichés of the time.”

At least the information content of Shakespeare had once seemed fresh. During
the postwar boom years, Wiener fretted, the “enormous per capita bulk of
communication”—ranging across newspapers and movies to radio, television, and
books—had bred mediocrity, an informational reversion to the mean. “More and more
we must accept a standardized inoffensive and insignificant product which, like the white
bread of the bakeries, is made rather for its keeping and selling properties than for its
food value.” “Heaven save us,” he pleaded, “from the first novels which are written
because a young man desires the prestige of being a novelist rather than because he has

111

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016331
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033187.txt,"From: Robert Lawrence Kuhn 
Sent: 11/9/2016 1:46:11 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Shocked in Beijing 
Importance: High 
You are a prophet.. 
was just with senior leaders in Beijing.. 
I'll be discussing China-U.S. relations under ""President Trump"" with the former Chinese Ambassador to the 
U.S on CCTV News (""Closer To china""), broadcast in china and internationally (NY - ""CCTV News"" channel) - 
Saturday at 8:30 pm and Sunday at 8:30 am New York time. Not an interview - we will each question each 
other 
we're playing in new territory here. There may be some contributions we can make. To be discussed 
privately. I return to Los Angeles on Nov. 17, but dont get to NY until Dec. 24, after my next trip to 
Beijing. 
Robert 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033187 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030636.txt,"From: Linda Stone 
Sent: 9/25/2016 7:10:59 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out 
if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might 
offer) are worth working on.... 
And wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes 
trump appealing and his flaws invisible... 
Will you have a cabinet position? 
How are you? 
Co-authored with iPhone auto-correct 
On Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
bring me up to speed. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030636 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019895.txt,"done early in her modeling career—a leak that everybody other than Melania assumed
could be traced back to Trump himself.

Inconsolable, she confronted her husband. Is this the future? She told him she wouldn’t
be able to take it.

Trump responded in his fashion—We’ll sue/—and set her up with lawyers who
successfully did just that. But he was unaccustomedly contrite, too. Just a little longer, he
told her. It would all be over in November. He offered his wife a solemn guarantee: there
was simply no way he would win. And even for a chronically—he would say helplessly—
unfaithful husband, this was one promise to his wife that he seemed sure to keep.

OOK Ok

The Trump campaign had, perhaps less than inadvertently, replicated the scheme from Mel
Brooks’s The Producers. In that classic, Brooks’s larcenous and dopey heroes, Max
Bialystock and Leo Bloom, set out to sell more than 100 percent of the ownership stakes
in the Broadway show they are producing. Since they will be found out only if the show is
a hit, everything about the show is premised on its being a flop. Accordingly, they create a
show so outlandish that it actually succeeds, thus dooming our heroes.

Winning presidential candidates—driven by hubris or narcissism or a preternatural
sense of destiny—have, more than likely, spent a substantial part of their careers, if not
their lives from adolescence, preparing for the role. They rise up the ladder of elected
offices. They perfect a public face. They manically network, since success in politics is
largely about who your allies are. They cram. (Even in the case of an uninterested George
W. Bush, he relied on his father’s cronies to cram for him.) And they clean up after
themselves—or, at least, take great care to cover up. They prepare themselves to win and
to govern.

The Trump calculation, quite a conscious one, was different. The candidate and his top
lieutenants believed they could get all the benefits of almost becoming president without
having to change their behavior or their fundamental worldview one whit: we don’t have
to be anything but who and what we are, because of course we won’t win.

Many candidates for president have made a virtue of being Washington outsiders; in
practice, this strategy merely favors governors over senators. Every serious candidate, no
matter how much he or she disses Washington, relies on Beltway insiders for counsel and
support. But with Trump, hardly a person in his innermost circle had ever worked in
politics at the national level—his closest advisers had not worked in politics at all.
Throughout his life, Trump had few close friends of any kind, but when he began his
campaign for president he had almost no friends in politics. The only two actual
politicians with whom Trump was close were Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, and both
men were in their own way peculiar and isolated. And to say that he knew nothing—
nothing at all—about the basic intellectual foundations of the job was a comic

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019895
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025066.txt,"activities. The Majlis al-Shura considers all
elements of the group's activities, including
its political and military wings, as part of
one holistic entity.

According to Hezbollah's top officials, this
unity of purpose among the group's diverse
activities is essential to its success. ""If the
military wing were separated from the
political wing, this would have
repercussions, and it would reflect on the
political scene,"" Qassem told a Lebanese
paper in 2000. ""Hezbollah's secretary-
general is the head of the Shura Council
and also the head of the Jihad Council, and
this means that we have one leadership,
with one administration.""

The Jihad Council is the functional council
underneath the Majlis al-Shura responsible
for all military matters. Qassem writes that
it ""comprises those in charge of resistance
activity, be that in terms of oversight,
recruitment, training, equipment, security,
or any other resistance-related endeavors.""
To accomplish its mission, the council is
divided into several smaller units in charge
of protecting the leadership and carrying
out internal and external surveillance, as
well as overseas operations. The party's
security branch is further broken down into
three subgroups: central, preventive, and
overseas security. In 2000, a dedicated
counterintelligence branch was reportedly
founded as well.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025066
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017229.txt,"4.2.12
WC: 191694

Church of the Creation”. He had been denied admission to the Illinois Bar because of his neo-
Nazi views.

Hale was invited to appear on the Today Show to be interviewed by Katie Couric. I was asked to
explain why I would even consider representing such a horrible racist and anti-Semite. Couric
began by asking Hale to describe his views “in a nutshell.” He went on about how non-
Europeans—by which he means Blacks and Jews—were destroying the “white race” and how he
was going to change that if he were admitted to the bar.

Couric then asked me why I believed a man with Hale’s views should be allowed to become a
lawyer.

KC: Mr. Hale should be allowed to practice law...why?

AD: Well first of all I am not a supporter of Mr. Hale. You asked about his views in a
nutshell. That’s where his views belong, in a nutshell. They are despicable, revolting
views. But what I’m concerned about is the precedential effect of giving character
committees the right to determine who shall and who shall not have the right to practice
law on the basis of ideology and belief. Remember character committees were invented to
originally keep out Blacks, Jews, gays, women, leftists...I just don’t want to see a
resurrection of character committees probing into the ideology of people like Mr. Hale. If
I take his case, and he’s asked me to represent him, I told him this and he knows this. All
the fees will be contributed to anti-racist organizations which will fight the ideology of
bigots like him. I hope the American public listening to him would reject his ideas in the
marketplace but not through censorship of the kind that the character committee is trying
to practice.

KC: But simply espousing these views, couldn’t that lead to violence, by other
individuals?

AD: Well there is no question how our Constitution strikes that balance. Reading the
work of Marx can lead to incitement. Reading the Bible can lead to incitement. But we
don’t draw the line at the espousal of views. We draw it at incitement or violence itself
and we don’t want to have a different standard for racists than we do for other people.

Couric then turned back to Hale:

KC: Ok, you talk about your enemies, Mr. Hale, and among them are Jews. Do you see
the irony that you hate Jews and yet you are calling on Mr. Dershowitz to help you?

MH: Well the fact of the matter if having a “Dershowitz” in this equation has brought our
church an incredible amount of publicity and as a minister in my church, it is my obligation
to bring about as much publicity as possible.

142

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017229
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032889.txt,"communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

http: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/ind
ex. html

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

http: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/inde
x.html

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032889
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023334.txt,"Date: Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: request for docs - AAP

To: ""Barry J. Cohen"" , ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Cc: Brad Wechsler

Attached are:
1. Executed Version of AAP
2. Most Current Draft of AAP
3. Redline of 1 against 2
4. Summary of AAP from Vanessa Eng

From: Barry J. Cohen [mailto
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 8:

To: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Melanie Spinella a. Ada Clapp
Subject: request for docs

Cc: Brad Wechsler
I will organize. Copying Ada who has a lot of this.
Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 17, 2017, at 7:25 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com<mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com>> wrote:

can you send me latest bank art loan docs. BRH agreement. TRA agreement , agreement amongst
shareholders. . , org chart for phaidon , art space and regan arts.. . , ownership only,. - list of
invetsments , ownership of l.a. house.structure, / list of art by highest gain. . -

Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:26 AM
Subject: Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.
To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>

Transaction complete !
. this - in spite of your collection of Elysium misfits. !!!

With Brad out of the office and unable to run his usual interference , the level of his utter incompetence was
brought front and center, he may be a step up from Eileen, but if he is, then it is not certainly not by much, .
Though you and I have spent many many hours discussing the importance of details and mechanics. I was not
shown one document re phaidon,- not one.. Brad wanted to keep it private between he and his so called""
advisors "" however as he was out of the office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get
to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the situation in your office is wholly ludicrous - to summarize - the
list I provided to Brad last December - things I thought were a priority to get done after consulting with your
office still remains virtually undone.

IT, still desperately needed- reporting flawed cumbersome and inaccurate . all done by hand as one -off
exercises , - airplane: re structure, (my only suggested priority in june ) is really ,no further ahead, ,consultants
up the kazoo but nothing at all done.( the office was told that i cannot even see the proposals received without
brads specific authorization ) - brad has no idea even as to what questions to ask. he knows little of finance, is
run roughshod over by almost everyone in the office. he is a little man , using your power, to appear larger .
Eileen was self aware enough to know she was over her head , that is a huge difference. bad info is
rampant ie 3 million in deductions Im told are taken for art space but on closer examination it turns out
they cannot be used at all. (ZERO benefit ) though you will be told yes they were deducted on the return they
said that is the question they get asked ! "" were they deducted ""not -""is there a benefit"" !! I asked for the
balance sheet and P and L for Regan arts , a basic first step in order to check your financials. ""sorry we never
got one?"" though 9.8 million invested, no p&l, nothing , a construction project run amok , no budget, the coo
fired after only 3 months. , no clue. I can add that artspace financials are also a total mess.

As your friend and in order toturn the page. I will try to be constructive

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023334
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015638.txt,"Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz
Case No.: CACE 15-000072

Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records

Page 18 of 20

COUNSEL LIST

SEAN D. REYES
Utah Attorney General

By: JONI J. JONES
JOEL A. FERRE
Assistant Utah Attorneys General

Bradley J. Edwards

FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING,
EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Telephone (954) 524-2820

Facsimile (954) 524-2822

E-mail: brad@pathtojustice.com

And

Paul G. Cassell

Pro Hae Vice Motion Pending

S.J. Quinney College of Law at the
University of Utah

383 S. University St.

Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Telephone:801-585-5202

Facsimile:801-585-6833

E-Mail:cassellp@law.utah.edu

Attomeys for Plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell

Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr., Esquire

Thomas.scott@csklegal.com; Steven.safra@csklegal.com

Cole Scott & Kissane P.A.

9150 S Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400

Miami, FL 33156

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015638
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032651.txt,"Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032651
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027238.txt,"Is Invitation: No
GUID: 6EFBD6CD-0F8C-4DAA-AD80-35 LA71C9FAIE
Message: MIT

Sender:

Time: 04/20/17 11:13:02 AM (514404782)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: DF81763A-0173-4C69-9CC6-C603 1 C8EBA48

Message: I can do Concurrent with the very fake bgc3 thing. It's so ridiculous how trapped bg is ... I think I'm just
there bc he cares about my next steps and wanted to help me.

Sender: i”

Time: 04/20/17 11:13:18 AM (514404798)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 9175C509-61A 1-465 1-9D 1C-53DDF4B65060
Message: If ed is game I'm Game

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 04/20/17 11:15:12 AM (514404912)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F73BCE9E-4127-46A8-A747-3 10A5B178FD1
Message: What is Geoff ling doing now

Sender: i

Time: 04/20/17 11:15:37 AM (514404937)

Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: D20E7043-68EE-44F9-B061-0OA6E6B9DAB6C
Message: Consulting

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 04/20/17 11:15:55 AM (514404955)

Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 1090EE78-FDC8-4D8 1-93D5-6F04A7BA5390
Message: Where

Sender: aa

Time: 04/20/17 11:15:58 AM (514404958)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027238
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014526.txt,"high yield problems, and U.S. consumers who might never spend their savings at the pump. All
these worries hit at once in January and February, prompting the S&P 500 to fall over 10% from its
2015 closing level of 2043. The year, at that point, appeared bleak.

Our view was to maintain a balanced and diversified position throughout the downturn, particularly
for the long haul, due to our belief that the major concerns, although understandable, were simply
not going to fully develop and asset prices would begin to track fundamentals more effectively
through the remainder of the year. The potential for risk assets to climb higher was there but a
catalyst was needed. For our full view on the year ahead, please read our December 2016 Monthl
Letter.

Exhibit 1: Mid-Cycle Slowdown Ended in Early 2016,
When Oil and Dollar Stabilized)

Source: EMVCME; FRB/Haver Analytics, Data as of December 5, 2016

!
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Our core belief was centered on healthy consumers who would indeed pick up their spending from
savings at the pump and become more confident as job growth continued and real incomes
increased. We also believed U.S. financial conditions and the economic backdrop would improve in
the second half of the year as the pressure from the strong dollar subsided and the deflationary
effects of the collapse in oil prices began to fade. In other words, we were witnessing evidence that
the mid-cycle slowdown that had hurt economic growth and corporate earnings was ending. [See
Exhibit 1] Based on this core belief, the “grind it out” year for risk assets would be back on track,
the business cycle would extend into 2017, bond yields would slowly shift higher, and equity
markets had the potential to head toward previous highs.

A series of unexpected outcomes

At this point, we did not characterize 2016 as The Year of the Unlikely. However, if you consider
specific events throughout the year in finance and sports, it is easy to see that now. We already
mentioned the second plunge in oil prices to the mid-$20s per barrel to start the year, and bond
markets in some areas of the world actually had negative yields—meaning the lender paid the
entity issuing the bonds to take their money! This was unlikely. How about Brexit vote in Great
Britain? Unlikely. In sports, Villanova University winning the national championship in men’s
college basketball (Nova’s first championship since 1985), Leicester—the English football club—

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014526
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026898.txt,"3.2% (i.e. the cost of borrowing). Stocks typically struggle when the cost of borrowing exceeds the
nominal growth of the economy (see Exhibit 4). Second, the recent backup in interest rates was
driven primarily by improving real growth expectations, not higher inflation. This distinction is critical,
because higher rates in response to improving real growth tend to benefit earnings sufficiently to
overcome the downward pressure they place on valuation multiples. Finally, it will take a number of
years before higher rates meaningfully impact aggregate S&P 500 interest expense, considering 91%
of S&P 500 debt is fixed-rate and only 13% matures over the next two years.

Source: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.

Low Probability of Recession

We continue to maintain a low, 10%, probability of recession driven by:
e The positive trend of leading economic indicators
e Low levels of inflation

e The continued slow but steady pace of Federal Reserve interest rate hikes. We believe that
Federal Reserve Chairman Powell’s recent commentary indicates that the FOMC will continue to be
driven by data and financial market conditions. Their stated goal is to extend this expansion
“indefinitely.” While the Federal Reserve dots point towards four more interest rate hikes by the end
of 2019, we do not think that such hikes materially increase the odds of a recession in an economy
that continues to grow at levels that are generally regarded as above trend growth in the US.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026898
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016651.txt,"DESALINATION PLANT ISSUES

@ 25 mgd facility required to produce 10 mgd potable water.
@ Approximately 10 acres required for infrastructure.
¢ Complex treatment processes.

é Brine by-product waste disposal via deep injection well
(ocean outtfalls no longer permitted for WIPs).

é Dewatered sludge must be disposed at landfill.
é Highly energy intensive to operate.

é Not necessarily exempt from proposed year-round water
restrictions drafted by SFWMD

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016651
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031686.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 5/30/2019 9:43:42 PM
To: Michael Wolff
Subject: Re:

Doesn’t everyone

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:41 PM Michael Wolff - wrote:

You have an art guy?

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:40 PM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
In addition my art guyd said the painting wasn’t very good

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:37 PM Michael Wolff <> wrote:

Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
reminder trump overuled congress on yemen .

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM Michael Wolff <q > wrote:

So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy
that sold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031686
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020512.txt,"53

researchers to intensify efforts to protect their proprietary intellectual property
from loss.

Promote Reciprocity

The academic community nationwide should work toward a common set of principles
and practices for protecting academic freedom and promote greater reciprocity.

To prevent influencers from using divide-and-conquer strategies (by rewarding
some institutions while punishing others), it is important for the national academic
community as a whole to come together to formulate and implement these principles.
US universities should not only work together but they should also work with other
universities around the world to develop a “Code of Conduct” for acceptable and
unacceptable practices in academic exchanges with Chinese institutions and funders.
(The section on think tanks in this section recommends similar measures.) The
academic community and government should also monitor instances where Chinese
entities may acquire financially challenged American colleges outright, ensuring that
their academic integrity is not compromised.**

Universities can and must continue to play a positive role in the US-China relationship.
Indeed, by introducing international students to American life and values, and
connecting them to new personal and professional relationships, universities are
arguably the important means by which the United States exercises its soft power.
Generally—but not always—individuals undergoing such an experience take a more
positive view of the country. Unfortunately, as Chinese students contribute much, not
least monetarily, to American universities, universities have been too slow to help them
integrate themselves more organically into campus life. As a result, Chinese students
report unacceptably high levels of depression and isolation or simply clubbing up with
each other.** While acting to mitigate the risks of improper interference, universities
must not forget their obligations to these students nor lose sight of the far greater
opportunity to advance cooperation and understanding.

NOTES

1 This process is well documented in Li, Cheng (ed.). Bridging Minds Across the Pacific: US-China Educational
Exchanges, 1978-2003. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 2005.

2 “Places of Origin.” Institute of International Education. 2017. https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights
/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Places-of-Origin.

3 “For China’s Elite, Studying Abroad Is de Rigueur.” Economist. May 17, 2018. https://www.economist.com
/special-report/2018/05/17/for-chinas-elite-studying-abroad-is-de-rigueur.

4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.

Section 4

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020512
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022994.txt,"From: Darren Indyke [
Sent: 5/26/2016 3:18:43 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Subject: Fwd: Maxwell (i

Attachments: IMAGE.jpg; IMAGE.jpg; IMAGE.jpg

Importance: — High

DARREN K. INDYKE
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Telephone:
Telecopier:

Be ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee ie ee ae ee
Ee i ee

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.

Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2016 Darren K.

Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved.

BS DS IS IS DIS Ig OIC BIS DIS 2S ik DIC Ig 24S BIS DIS 2S 2k DIS Ik 24S BIC DIS 24S DiC DIC ik DIC BIS DIR 2S 2k DIC IC 24S IS DIS SIC DC DIS IC DIC BIC DIR SIC DIC DIC 2g 34S BIC DIC FIC DC DIC 2g 24S IC DIC SIC DC DIC IC 24S IC OIC 5S 24S DIC 2g 24S IC 24S SIC Df DIC 2g DIC Dk OIC BIC 24g OIC 2k OIC ik 2Ie 2s 2fe 2c 2
iS 2s 3S 2 Dis 2g 246s 2k is 2k 2s 2k

Begin forwarded message:
From: ""Miles Alexander"" <
Subject: Fwd: Re: Maxwell

Date: May 24, 2016 at 11:35:17 AM EDT

To:

Hi

Answer to questions asked.
No response received
Regards

Miles Alexander

Operations Manager

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022994
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026640.txt,"message on economic reform. It is likely, I believe, that the focus of the
general public will be moved to these critical economic reforms. (3) I repeat
a point I’ve made in the past, that because the mainstream media and most
scholars are still so skeptical of Mr Trump’s policies, the hurdle for him to
clear and impress positively is very low. Ironically, such general hostility
will probably work in favour of the Trump Administration. 5 days after the
surprise election victory, the press declared that Mr Trump’s transition plan
was in hopeless disarray, only for Mr Trump to announce one cabinet
appointment every day — ahead of the schedule of Presidents Obama and Bill
Clinton when they got elected. (4) We will likely see a less radical President
Trump. We have already seen this on various issues (the Wall, prosecuting
Ms Clinton), and my guess is that the trade policy will be more restrictive,
but the changes will be nuanced at the same time. The appointment of the
next Treasury Secretary will convey an important message. (5) I personally
think that various countries will likely adopt industrial policies, as a
substitute for slower trade globalization. Already, the UK’s PM May
announced an ambitious industrial strategy, with a focus on technology. The
government is committed to investing in R&D through the Industrial
Strategy Challenge Fund. Regular readers of our work should also know
that that is what I would recommend for Japan to consider. I just came back
from a trip to Singapore, and understand that the government there is also
struggling to find the best strategy to deal with the next phase of economic
development, now that the growth model based on trade and finance may be
coming to an end. I think the US should also contemplate its own industrial
policy. The title of this section is ‘economic Olympics’ to convey the notion
that the world is in competition, not just along the axes of cheapness of
labour and technology. There are different disciplines (analogous to the
various sports in Olympics) in which any country can excel, if the efforts are
appropriately focused. Instead of being mediocre in many events, countries
should seek to win the gold medal in their best events...

5%-plus nominal GDP growth in the US in 2017? There are several
inconsistencies in the market trends: (1) a strong dollar and strong US
equities; (2) protectionism and a strong dollar (Mexico, for example, has
gotten 10% cheaper so far this month, and China is also cheaper. The
greater the threats of protectionism against these countries, the cheaper are
their costs of production...); (3) higher yields and strong equities; (4) Mr
Trump does not like Chair Yellen or the Fed but he still needs and prefers
low interest rates. The only variable that can address these inconsistencies is
3-4% real economic growth and 5%-plus nominal GDP growth in the

US. While it is unlikely that 5% nominal GDP growth is sustained over
time, the atmospherics will stop the talk about ‘r-star’ and help support
interest rates in the US. 2017 may very well see 5%-plus nominal GDP

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026640
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033229.txt,"From: Larry Visoski

Sent: 3/16/2017 8:35:54 AM

To: Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]
cc: Lesley Groff as
Subject: Trump TFR Friday PBI

Jeffrey

Pres. Trump arrives PBI Friday at 6pm is TFR is effective,. If we land before 6pm we are ok.
Newark is not a gateway airport to PBI, only Teterboro,,
If you want to arrive in PBI after 6pm,. I can relocate the GIV to Teterboro,

what time do you estimate wheels up Friday from Newark? Or should I move plane to Teterboro Friday
afternoon?

Thx
Larry

Sent from my iPhone

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033229
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030598.txt,"5) Your above accounts were also linked with Mr Leslie Wexner.

6) You are known to be or have previously been closely associated with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and
Kevin Spacey.

7) You have made substantial contributions to the Clintons’ philanthropic causes. Tax reform campaigners
have previously been critical of those who engage in public life or the political process while avoiding or
evading tax. Hilary Clinton herself, speaking in 2012, noted the importance of elites paying a substantial share
of tax: ""One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable
manner — especially from the elites in every country.”

It is intended shortly to publish the results of our survey in both the US and the UK.

As responsible journalists acting in the public interest, we would first like to give you the opportunity to
comment.

If we do not hear from you by 18:00 on Monday 12th January 2015 (preferably by email to

Ee we shall proceed on the basis that you do not wish to comment on or amend

our information.

But we have approached you in a straightforward fashion and hope you will take this opportunity to respond if
you wish. Your substantive responses to each of our numbered points will be carefully considered and
published if appropriate.

(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of “inaccuracies” as a
substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as
substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.)

We are, of course, happy to discuss directly any concerns you may have.
We would be most grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this letter. This will save us from chasing.
Yours faithfully,

David Pegg
The Guardian
Kings Place
90 York Way
London

N1 9GU

Tel:
Email:

Visit theguardian.com. On your mobile and tablet, download the Guardian iPhone and Android apps
theguardian.com/guardianapp and our tablet editions theguardian.com/editions. Save up to 57% by subscribing to the
Guardian and Observer - choose the papers you want and get full digital access. Visit subscribe.theguardian.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030598
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016889.txt,"Those are also the processes by which all new knowledge is created: They are how we
innovate, make progress, and create abstract understanding for its own sake. This is
human-level intelligence: thinking. It is also, or should be, the property we seek in
artificial general intelligence (AGI). Here I'll reserve the term “thinking” for processes
that can create understanding (explanatory knowledge). Popper’s argument implies that
all thinking entities—human or not, biological or artificial—must create such knowledge
in fundamentally the same way. Hence understanding any of those entities requires
traditionally human concepts such as culture, creativity, disobedience, and morality—
which justifies using the uniform term people to refer to all of them.

Misconceptions about human thinking and human origins are causing
corresponding misconceptions about AGI and how it might be created. For example, it is
generally assumed that the evolutionary pressure that produced modern humans was
provided by the benefits of having an ever greater ability to innovate. But if that were so,
there would have been rapid progress as soon as thinkers existed, just as we hope will
happen when we create artificial ones. If thinking had been commonly used for anything
other than imitating, it would also have been used for innovation, even if only by
accident, and innovation would have created opportunities for further innovation, and so
on exponentially. But instead, there were hundreds of thousands of years of near stasis.
Progress happened only on timescales much longer than people’s lifetimes, so in a typical
generation no one benefited from any progress. Therefore, the benefits of the ability to
innovate can have exerted little or no evolutionary pressure during the biological
evolution of the human brain. That evolution was driven by the benefits of preserving
cultural knowledge.

Benefits to the genes, that is. Culture, in that era, was a very mixed blessing to
individual people. Their cultural knowledge was indeed good enough to enable them to
outclass all other large organisms (they rapidly became the top predator, etc.), even
though it was still extremely crude and full of dangerous errors. But culture consists of
transmissible information—memes—and meme evolution, like gene evolution, tends to
favor high-fidelity transmission. And high-fidelity meme transmission necessarily entails
the suppression of attempted progress. So it would be a mistake to imagine an idyllic
society of hunter-gatherers, learning at the feet of their elders to recite the tribal lore by
heart, being content despite their lives of suffering and grueling labor and despite
expecting to die young and in agony of some nightmarish disease or parasite. Because,
even if they could conceive of nothing better than such a life, those torments were the
least of their troubles. For suppressing innovation in human minds (without killing them)
is a trick that can be achieved only by human action, and it is an ugly business.

This has to be seen in perspective. In the civilization of the West today, we are
shocked by the depravity of, for instance, parents who torture and murder their children
for not faithfully enacting cultural norms. And even more by societies and subcultures
where that is commonplace and considered honorable. And by dictatorships and
totalitarian states that persecute and murder entire harmless populations for behaving
differently. We are ashamed of our own recent past, in which it was honorable to beat
children bloody for mere disobedience. And before that, to own human beings as slaves.
And before that, to burn people to death for being infidels, to the applause and
amusement of the public. Steven Pinker’s book The Better Angels of our Nature contains
accounts of horrendous evils that were normal in historical civilizations. Yet even they

86

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016889
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025700.txt,"Yes, your father can do that. And if you are still in a legal nonimmigrant status (Fi and studying
full time) when the petition reaches its priority date, you might be able...

Read More »

ae

What are some things that the French do best?

ee

Tsuk Janos, For the past 65 years have lived on and off in France

Written Jun 24

ae,

In no particular order :

Complaining I think the French are very good in that field but I confess that my Hungarian
compatriots are not bad at it either !

Considering their f...

Read More »

What does the Italian ""Grazie al cazzo"" mean?

F perenne
Snes

Alberto Tandoi, I’m italian. I write for work (copywriter) and for fun!

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025700
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023452.txt,"Poetry in America for Teachers II : The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky
(an initiative of Harvard Graduate School of Education, HarvardX and WGBH)

Combining study of poetry with study of science, environment and the visual arts
. Materials include hundreds archival images and live footage shot in

Cape Cod, Nantucket, Vermont, New York, Connecticut, Jamaica, Aspen, California,
Papua New Guinea including oceans, ponds, marshes, birds, fish mountains, coral
reefs, forests as well in some major collections (HMNH etc)

with author Michael Pollan on Joel Barlow (and colonial agriculture)

with economist Lawrence Summers on Oliver Wendell Holmes, (and technology
and “one hoss shay” depreciation)

with Harvard students at the Nantucket Whaling Museum and with, John Steele,
editor of the science magazine, Nautlilus, ,on Lowell and Melville

with Vice President Al Gore on Ralph Waldo Emerson ,and, with eco-critic Lawrence
Buell (with footage taped on the Concord River as well as in Harvard’s Houghton
Rare Book Library )

with a dozen Harvard students and Boston area school teachers on Emily
Dickinson’s “skies” (shot at Emily Dickinson’s home in Amherst Massachusetts) and
with ED’s original mss. at Harvard University

with Martin Espada and other New Yorkers (footage shot on the East River) on
Whitman and urban greenspace and with Susan Howe on Stevens and parks

with Richard Dawkins on Frost, evolution and probability and with Jay Parini, Frost
biographer, in Frost’s cabin on “The Road not Taken”.

with Director of the College Board (and writer of the Common Core Standards) ,
David Coleman on Robert Frost’s “Birches” (filmed in a birch grove)

with Peter Galison on Einstein and Modernism (taped in the Harvard Scientific
Instruments collection in the Harvard Science Center) and with author Walter
Isaacson on Einstein and Modernism (Fogg Museum)

with Ray Dalio on Marianne Moore( in Rajah Ampat with Conservation
International); and with Jane Pickering, Head of the Harvard Natural History
Museum, ( filmed in the Harvard Museum of Natural History)

with Walt Mossberg and David Malan on coding, computer language and L-A-N-G-U-
A-G-E poetry

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023452
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026209.txt,"return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026209
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016457.txt,"Recarey died in May after a brief illness. He was 50 years old.

More from the series

| rlow a future Trump Cabinet
member gave a serial sex abuser
the @eal of a lifetime

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016457
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013166.txt,"250 13 Local, Global and Glocal Knowledge Representation

ImplicationLink
InheritanceLink $X animal
EvaluationLink

PredicateNode: eat
ListLink

\$X

ConceptNode: food

is
AverageLink $X
ImplicationLink
InheritanceLink $X animal
EvaluationLink
PredicateNode: eat
ListLink

\$X
ConceptNode: food

The AverageLink invokes an estimation of the average TruthValue of the embedded expression
(in this case an ImplicationLink) over all possible values of the variable $X. If there are type
restrictions regarding the variable $X, these are taken into account in conducting the averaging.
For AllLink and Exist s-Link may be used in the same places as AverageLink, with uncertain
truth value semantics defined in PLN theory using third-order probabilities. There is also a
ScholemLink used to indicate variable dependencies for existentially quantified variables, used
in cases of multiply nested existential quantifiers.

EvaluationLink and MemberLink have overlapping semantics, allowing expression of the
same conceptual/logical relationships in terms of predicates or sets, i.e.

EvaluationLink
PredicateNode: eat
ListLink
$X
ConceptNode: food

has the same semantics as

MemberLink
ListLink
$X
ConceptNode: food
ConceptNode: EatingEvents

The relation between the predicate ""eat"" and the concept ""EatingEvents"" is formally given by

ExtensionalEquivalenceLink
ConceptNode: EatingEvents
SatisfyingSetLink

PredicateNode: eal

In other words, we say that ""EatingEvents"" is the SatisfyingSet of the predicate ""eat"": it is the
set of entities that satisfy the predicate ""eat"". Note that the truth values of MemberLink and
EvaluationLink are fuzzy rather than probabilistic.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013166
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028946.txt,"From: Lisa New

Sent: 12/2/2015 4:55:05 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Poetry Update and Thank You

Importance: — High

That's ideal. Larry's away and I'll be working all day. I'm free any time.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:31 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm in Cambridge sat?

On Wednesday, 2 December 2015, Lisa New {> wrote:

Dear Jeffrey,

May | drop by before the New Year (perhaps on the 9th, or on the 17th or 18th?) to get your advice
about my renewal of the Templeton campaign, and also my needs in the coming year for Poetry in
America? Below is the letter I'm sending out to my friends and supporters, and at the bottom a
message just for you....

-Lisa

That you are receiving this letter means that you are among a special community of friends whose
support— financial, moral, intellectual, logistical— has allowed my initiative, Poetry in America, to
realize what seemed, a year ago, almost certainly too ambitious a vision. That vision was to
produce the highest quality educational video on American poetry, creating a body of
humanities content capable of reaching a broad community of learners: formal and informal,
online and residential, young and old, American and international. And it was to

begin— rapidly— to disseminate and distribute our work.

Whether you donated to Poetry in America through Filmmaker’s Collaborative (our 501c3 fiscal
sponsor), through Harvard, or through WGBH; whether you appeared on camera or talked an
elusive friend into appearing on camera to discuss a poem; whether you lent us your film crew, or
provided overnight use of your hotel suite or apartment or of your whole skyscraper; whether you
highlighted our work on your stage, or talked your colleagues into becoming corporate sponsors;
whether you flew to Boston to install state-of-the-art editing and video storage equipment, or asked
your children’s school to let us film there; whether you encouraged your family foundation to take an
interest in the project, or gave us a lesson in IP, in licensing, in the rudiments of finance, or of
distribution; whether you praised, or gave timely, much-needed criticism— you enabled what we
have done.

Here’s what we have to report, and to show, a year later, thanks to your help. Links offer sneak
peeks of works -in-progress across the full portfolio of Poetry in America projects.

e The first eight-episode season of the public television series Poetry in America (a co-
production between WGBH, Emmy Award-winning filmmaker David Grubin, and my own new
production company, Verse Video), is now fully funded and in production, with episodes featuring

Bill Clinton, Herbie Hancock and Sonia Sanchez_on Langston Hughes, Frank Gehry on Carl

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028946
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305.txt,"54034

Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations

Vance v. Whirlpool Corp., 716 F.2d
1010 (4th Cir. 1983) (describing notice
posting tolling as “the prevailing view
of the courts”’); Elliot v. Group Med. &
Surgical Serv., 714 F.2d 556, 563-64
(5th Cir. 1983); EEOC v. Kentucky State
Police Dept., 80 F.3d 1086, 1096 (6th
Cir. 1996), cert. denied 519 U.S. 963
(1996); Posey v. Skyline Corp., 702 F.2d
102 (7th Cir. 1983); Schroeder v. Copley
Newspaper, 879 F.2d 266 (7th Cir.
1989); Kephart v. Inst. Gas Tech., 581
F.2d 1287, 1289 (7th Cir. 1978);
Beshears v. Asbill, 930 F.2d 1348 (8th
Cir. 1991); McClinton v. Alabama By-
Prods. Corp., 743 F.2d 1483 (11th Cir.
1984); see also Henchy v. City of
Absecon, 148 F. Supp. 2d 435, 439 (D.
N.J. 2001); Kamens v. Summit Stainless,
Inc., 586 F. Supp. 324, 328 (E.D. Pa.
1984) (FLSA). 147 (But see Wilkerson v.
Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc., 683 F.2d
344, 347 (10th Cir. 1982) (‘the simple
failure to post [Title VII and ADEA]
notices, without intent to actively
mislead the plaintiff respecting the
cause of action, does not extend the
time within which a claimant must file
his or her discrimination charge.’’))

After careful consideration, the Board
is persuaded that the prevailing judicial
view should apply in the NLRA context
as well.148 As an equitable concept,
equitable tolling is a matter of fairness.
The Board has determined that many
employees are unaware of their NLRA
rights and has devised a minimally
burdensome means of attempting to
rectify that situation—requiring
employers to post workplace notices
informing employees of those rights. To
bar an employee who is excusably
unaware of the NLRA from seeking a
remedy for a violation of NLRA rights
because he or she failed to file an unfair
labor practice charge within the 10(b)
period, when the employer did not post
the required notice, would unfairly
deprive the employee of the protection
of the Act because of the employer’s
failure to comply with its legal
responsibilities. To deny equitable
tolling in such circumstances “would
grant to the employee a right to be
informed without redress for violation.”’
Bonham v. Dresser Industries, above,
569 F.2d at 193.149

147 See comments of Harkin and Miller, AFL-CIO,

and Service Employees International Union (SEIU).
148 The Board has broad discretion to interpret
10(b), including equitable tolling, in accordance

with its experience administering the Act. Lodge 64,

IAM v. NLRB, 949 F.2d 441, 444 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
(deferring to the Board’s interpretation of 10(b)
equitable exceptions).

149 Under the final rule, the Board could also find
the failure to post the notice to be an unfair labor
practice, and could, if appropriate, consider a
willful failure to post to be evidence of unlawful
motive in an unfair labor practice case. However,

The Board received many comments
opposing this proposed rule provision.
Several comments assert that, when a
charging party is unaware of the facts
supporting the finding of an unfair labor
practice, the Board tolls the 10(b) period
only when the charged party has
fraudulently concealed those facts from
the charging party.15° That is not so.
The Board has long held, with court
approval, that the 10(b) period begins to
run only when the charging party has
notice that the NLRA has been violated.
The party asserting the 10(b) defense
has the burden to show such notice; it
may do so by showing that the charging
party had either actual or constructive
knowledge of the alleged unfair labor
practice prior to the 10(b) period. See,
e.g., Broadway Volkswagen, 342 NLRB
1244, 1246 (2004), enfd. sub nom. East
Bay Automotive Council v. NLEB, 483
F.2d 628, 634 (9th Cir. 2007); University
Moving & Storage Co., 350 NLRB 6, 7,
18 (2007); John Morrell & Co., above,
304 NLRB at 899; Pullman Building
Company, 251 NLRB 1048 (1980), enfd.
691 F.2d 507 (9th Cir. 1982) (table);
Burgess Construction, 227 NLRB 765,
766 (1977), enfd. 596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir.
1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 940 (1979).
Knowledge may be imputed if the
charging party would have discovered
the unlawful conduct by exercising
reasonable or due diligence. Broadway
Volkswagen, above, 342 NLRB at 1246.
Certainly, the Board has found it
appropriate to toll the 10(b) period
when the charging party was excusably
unaware of the pertinent facts because
the charged party had fraudulently
concealed them; see, e.g., Burgess
Construction, above, 227 NLRB at 766;
but tolling is not limited to such
circumstances. Pullman Building
Company, above, 251 NLRB at 1048.

To the extent that the comments argue
that the Board should not engage in
equitable tolling of the 10(b) period
when an employer has merely failed to
post the notice but not engaged in
fraudulent concealment,151 the Board
disagrees. Fraudulent concealment
concerns a different kind of equitable
doctrine, and is not directly relevant to
the notice posting equitable tolling
doctrine hereby adopted. See Mercado,
above, 410 F.3d at 46-47 n.8 (employer
misconduct and equitable tolling

in the absence of equitable tolling of the 10(b)
period, such “redress” would not aid an employee
who was excusably unaware of his or her NLRA
rights, failed to file a timely charge, and thus was
denied any remedy for violation of those rights. Cf.
Kanakis Co., 293 NLRB 435, 436 fn. 10 (1989)
(possibility of criminal sanctions against employer
would be little comfort to charging party if deprived
of recourse to Board’s remedial processes).

150 See, e.g., comments of FMI, COLLE.

151 See, e.g., comments of FMI, COLLE.

doctrine form “two distinct lines of
cases applyl[ing] two distinct standards
to two distinct bases for equitable
tolling’).

Some comments argue that because
Section 10(b) contains a limited
exception to the 6-month filing period
for employees in the military, it is
improper for the Board to toll the 10(b)
period under other circumstances.15?
The Board rejects this argument as
foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s
holding in Zipes, above, and by the long
line of Board and court decisions
finding tolling of the 10(b) period
appropriate. In any event, the exception
in Section 10(b) for persons in the
military provides that if the aggrieved
person “was prevented from filing such
charge by reason of service in the armed
forces, in which event the six-month
period shall be computed from the day
of his discharge.’’ This provision does
not toll the six-month period during
armed service; rather, it states that the
six-month period begins at discharge.
See Holland v. Florida, 130 S.Ct. 2549,
2561 (2010) (rejecting argument that
explicit exceptions to time limits in
nonjurisdictional statute of limitations
precluded equitable tolling).15%

A number of comments contend that
tolling the 10(b) period is contrary to the
salutary purpose of statutes of
limitations in general, and 10(b) in
particular, which is “‘to require diligent
prosecution of known claims, thereby
providing finality and predictability in
legal affairs and ensuring that claims
will be resolved while evidence is
reasonably available and fresh.” 154
Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th Edition, at
1546. The Board recognizes that with
the passage of time evidence can be lost
and witnesses die, move away, or their
memories fade; it therefore will not
lightly find that the 10(b) period should
be tolled. However, like the courts
whose decisions are cited above, the
Board also recognizes that equitable
tolling is a fundamental part of the
statute of limitations, and that inequity
results from barring an individual from
seeking relief from a violation of his or
her NLRA rights where the individual
excusably was unaware of these rights.
After all, the purpose of a statute of
limitations is to “require diligent

152 See, e.g., comments of California Chamber and
NCAE.

153 American Bus Association v. Slater, 231 F. 3d
1 (D.C. Cir. 2000), cited by California Chamber and
NCAE, did not concern equitable tolling and is
therefore inapposite. The court there also found that
Congress had expressly limited the sanctions
available under the Americans with Disabilities Act
to those enumerated in that statute; such is not the
case under the NLRA.

154 See, e.g., comments of FMI, COLLE, and U.S.
Chamber of Commerce.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029401.txt,"From: Donald Rubin 
Sent: 1/22/2017 7:31:32 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Republican health care experts dismiss Donald Trump's ideas 
Importance: High 
https://www.statnews.com/20 1 6/03/04/trump -repub cans-health-care/? s camp aign=trendmd  
Jeffrey, 
This cannot be true, can it? This guy must be as dumb about this stuff as a tampon laced with arsenic!! 
HELP! 
Great meeting yesterday — really enjoyed it. 
And happy birthday again, Don 
Donald B. Rubin 
John L. Loeb Professor of Statistics 
Department of Statistics, Harvard University 
1 Oxford Street 
Cambridge MA 02138 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029401 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029480.txt,"Business Expansion Portfolio and Prospectus
Twin City Care of The Virgin Islands
5

Ambulance Division and Definition

TCMIH provides Advanced Life Support services (ALS) 24/7, 365 days a year to our hospitals,
nursing facilities and various other health care providers in the Virgin Islands. Our entire fleet will
stand ready to provide consistent, high quality, patient centered care. Not only are we here for the
day-to-day needs of our community, but during times of need, for mutual aid support to the Virgin
Islands Department of Health EMS and the Virgin Islands Territorial Emergency Management
Agency.

All Paramedics, EMTs, Nurses and Emergency Medical Responders will be working under the
guidance of our Medical Director Dr. Christopher C. Hill DO, (Board License Emergency
Physician) in accordance with National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

As the premier interfacility non-emergency ambulance provider for the community, our role is as
diverse as the patients we serve. From providing critical care transports to monitoring the vital
signs and offering support for a Hospice patient, it is all about the connections we make, each day,
and each transport.

Advanced Life Support (ALS)

ALS care is provided by Advance EMTs, and Paramedics who are licensed in pre-hospital care,
having qualifications and equipment to provide BLS capabilities as well as advanced airway
management, cardiac monitoring and defibrillation, [V administration, administering of life saving
medications and capable of handling severe medical emergencies.

Specialty Care Transports (ALS-2)

Patients who require specialized monitoring of IV medication drips and ventilators. Care from Air
Ambulance services (Medivac).

Mental Health Transport and Crisis Hotline

Specialized medical transport team, working with agencies such as law enforcement, mental
healthcare providers, hospital emergency rooms and nursing facilities to ensure the safe, efficient
and dignified transport of the mental health patient. In addition to the transport component, Twin
City will be a vested partner in the progress and wellbeing of our mental health community at
large. Attending and participating in many community forums such as local planning meetings,
any mental health taskforce meetings TCMIH will be committed to assisting with the best practices
for the providers for the patients that we serve.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029480
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018804.txt,"﻿Integra Realty Resources 
Caribbean 
Appraisal of Going Concern 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Mixed Use Property 
18A-1, 18-B1,18-B and 18-W Remainder Estate Smith Bay 
East End Quarter, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 
Client Reference: 23559 
Prepared For: 
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico 
Effective Date of the Appraisal: 
November 25, 2015 
Report Format: 
Appraisal Report —Standard Format 
IRR - Caribbean 
File Number: 172-2015-0181 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
18A-1, 18-61,18-B and 18-W Remainder Estate Smith Bay 
East End Quarter, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 
Integra Realty Resources 
Caribbean 
December 15, 2015 
Roberto A. Soltero 
Vice President 
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico 
PO Box 362708 
San Juan, PR 00936-2708 
6500 Red Hook Plaza Suite 201 
St. Thomas, VI 00802 
U.S. Virgin Islands 
T 340-714-7325 
T 844-952-7304 
caribbean@irr.com 
www.irr.com 
SUBJECT: Market Value Appraisal 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
18A-1, 18-61,18-B and 18-W Remainder Estate Smith Bay 
East End Quarter, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 
Client Reference: 23559 
IRR - Caribbean File No. 172-2015-0181 
Dear Mr. Soltero: 
Integra Realty Resources — Caribbean is pleased to submit the accompanying appraisal of 
the referenced property. The purpose of the appraisal is to develop an opinion of the 
market value of the leased fee (going concern) interest in the property. The client for the 
assignment is Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, and the intended use is for Commercial credit 
administration. 
The appraisal is intended to conform with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal 
Practice (USPAP), the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal 
Practice of the Appraisal Institute, the Principles of Appraisal Practice and Code of Ethics of 
the American Society of Appraisers, the RICS Valuation Professional Standards, the 
International Valuation Standards, applicable jurisdictional appraisal regulations, and the 
appraisal guidelines of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The appraisal is also prepared in 
accordance with the appraisal regulations issued in connection with the Financial 
Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). 
To report the assignment results, we use the Appraisal Report option of Standards Rule 2-
2(a) of USPAP. As USPAP gives appraisers the flexibility to vary the level of information in an 
Appraisal Report depending on the intended use and intended users of the appraisal, we 
Roberto A. Soltero 
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico 
December 15, 2015 
Page 2 
adhere to the Integra Realty Resources internal standards for an Appraisal Report — 
Standard Format. This format summarizes the information analyzed, the appraisal methods 
employed, and the reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 
The subject is an existing 250-slip marina with 5 commercial buildings containing a mixture 
of retail and office space types. The buildings contain 48,661 square feet of rentable area 
and were constructed in multiple stages; with the majority of the construction completed in 
1993. The commercial space is 85% leased as of the effective appraisal date. The marina 
docks were constructed in multiple phases between 1991-1995 and are 52.8% occupied as 
of the effective appraisal date. The total site area is 2.76 acres or 120,226 square feet, which 
includes 0.64 acre or 27,878 square feet, that is re-claimed land. The property also includes 
3.2 acres of seabed under the marina dock structures which is leased to the property owner 
from the Government of the Virgin Islands. 
Based on the valuation analysis in the accompanying report, and subject to the definitions, 
assumptions, and limiting conditions expressed in the report, our opinion of value is as 
follows: 
Value Conclusion* 
Appraisal Premise 
Market Value 
Interest Appraised Date of Value Value Conclusion 
Leased Fee (Going Concern) November 25, 2015 $24,360,000 
*Values expressed in United States Dollars 
Allocation of Going Concern Value 
Amount 	% of Total 
Tangible Property 
Land & Improvements 	$24,250,000 	99.5% 
Tangible Personal Property (FF&E) 	$110,000 	0.5% 
Total Tangible Property 	$24,360,000 	100.0% 
I nta ngi ble Assets 	$0 	0.0% 
Market Value* 	$24,360,000 	100.0% 
*Specifically excluded from the valuation are cash and equivalents and current liabilities. 
The allocation of value components is based on the going-concern premise, which holds that 
the value of a business as a going-concern is equal to the sum of the values of the tangible 
and intangible assets. The allocation assumes continued operation of the marina business. 
Were the marina business to cease operations, the values of the individual components 
would likely be different from the allocated values of the going concern. 
Roberto A. Soltero 
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico 
December 15, 2015 
Page 3 
Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions 
The value conclusions are subject to the following extraordinary assumptions that may affect the assignment 
results. An extraordinary assumption is uncertain information accepted as fact. If the assumption is found to 
be false as of the effective date of the appraisal, we reserve the right to modify our value conclusions. 
1. The subject property has a fueling dock and four fuel storage tanks located on site; including three diesel 
and one gasoline. There were no signs of contamination during our inspection and we have assumed that 
there is no adverse environmental impact in connection with the existing fuel equipment used on the 
subject property. 
2. The parking garage at the subject slightly encroaches on the neighboring property to the immediate 
northwest. This land is owned by the Government of the Virgin Islands and we have assumed that no claim 
will arise from the encroachments. 
3. For this analysis, we have valued the going concern interest in the subject property and have allocated the 
value of the personal property from the value of the real property. We were provided with financial 
statments from ownership that indicates the depreciated book value of these assets. It is beyond our scope 
to value these assets in use; therefore, we have assumed that the book values of teh personal property 
items shown in the statments provided by ownership are reasonably accurate for the purpose of this 
allocation exercise. 
The value conclusions are based on the following hypothetical conditions that may affect the assignment 
results. A hypothetical condition is a condition contrary to known fact on the effective date of the appraisal 
but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. 
1. No hypothetical conditions were employed in this analysis. 
The opinions of value expressed in this report are based on estimates and forecasts that are 
prospective in nature and subject to considerable risk and uncertainty. Events may occur 
that could cause the performance of the property to differ materially from our estimates, 
such as changes in the economy, interest rates, capitalization rates, financial strength of 
tenants, and behavior of investors, lenders, and consumers. Additionally, our opinions and 
forecasts are based partly on data obtained from interviews and third party sources, which 
are not always completely reliable. Although we are of the opinion that our findings are 
reasonable based on available evidence, we are not responsible for the effects of future 
occurrences that cannot reasonably be foreseen at this time. 
irr. 
Roberto A. Soltero 
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico 
December 15, 2015 
Page 4 
If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned. Thank you for the 
opportunity to be of service. 
Respectfully submitted, 
Integra Realty Resources - Caribbean 
Mark J. Weathers 
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser 
VI Certificate # 1-21738-1B 
Telephone: 340-714-7325 
Email: mweathers@irr.com 
James V. Andrews, MAI, CRE, FRICS, ASA, CVA 
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser 
VI Certificate # 0-14194-1B 
Telephone: 345-746-3110 
Email: jandrews@irr.com 
El 
Table of Contents 
Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions 	1 	Income Capitalization Approach 	57 
General Information 	3 	Market Rent Analysis — General Retail 
Identification of Subject 	3 	Space 	59 
Sale History 	3 	Market Rent Analysis — General Office 
Pending Transactions 	3 	Space 	65 
Purpose of the Appraisal 	4 	Market Rent Analysis — Restaurant Space 	71 
Basis of Value 	4 	Market Rent Analysis — Marina Slip Rentals78 
Definition of Property Rights Appraised 	4 	Reconciliation and Conclusion of Value 	106 
Definition of Going-Concern Premise 	4 	Exposure Time 	107 
Intended Use and User 	5 	Marketing Period 	107 
Applicable Requirements Prior Services 	5 5 	Allocation of Going-Concern Value 108 Value of Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment 
Cornpetency 	5 	(FF&E) 	108 
Independence 	6 	Value of Intangible Assets 	109 
RICS Valuer Registration 	6 	Allocation of Going-Concern Value 	109 
Currency 	6 	Insurable Replacement Cost 	110 
Scope of Work 	6 	Certification 	111 
Economic Analysis 	8 	Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 	113 
Area Analysis 	8 	Addenda 
Surrounding Area Analysis 	22 	A. Appraiser Qualifications 
Marina Market Analysis 	25 	B. Financials and Property Information 
Property Analysis 	36 	C. Comparable Data 
Land Description and Analysis 	36 	D. DCF Reports 
Improvements Description and Analysis 	42 	E. Engagement Letter 
Real Estate Taxes 	52 
Highest and Best Use 	54 
Valuation 	56 
Valuation Methodology 	56 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
ID, 
Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions 1 
Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions 
Property Name 
Address 
Property Type 
Owner of Record 
Parcel ID 
Legal Description 
IGY Ameri can Yacht Harbor Marina 
18A-1, 18-B1,18-B and 18-W Remainder Estate Smith Bay 
East End Quarter, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 
Mixed Use- Marina 
IGY-AYH ST. Thomas Holdings, LLC 
1-07702-0135-00, 1-07702-0134-00, 1-07702-0133-00, and 
1-07702-0198-00 
Parcel Nos. 18A-1 Remainder, 18B-1 Remainder, 18B 
Remainder Estate and 18-W Estate Smith Bay, Nos. 1,2 and 
3 East End Quarter, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands 
Land Area 
Number of Units 
Gross Building Area 
Rentable Area 
Percent Leased 
Year Built; Year Renovated 
2.76 acres; 120,226 SF 
105 
72,808 SF 
48,652 SF 
85% 
1992; N/A 
Zoning Designation 
Highest a nd Best Use-As if Vacant 
Highest a nd Best Use-As Improved 
Exposure Time; Marketing Period 
Effective Date of the Appraisal 
Date of the Report 
Property Interest Appraised 
W-1, Waterfront- Pleasure 
Marina oriented commercial use 
Continued marina and commercial use 
12-24 months; 12-24 months 
November 25, 2015 
December 15, 2015 
Leased Fee (Going Concern) 
Market Value Indications 
Cost Approach 
Sales Comparison Approach 
Income Capitalization Approach 
Market Value Conclusion* 
Not Used 
Not Used 
$24,360,000 
$24,360,000 
*Values expressed in United States Dollars 
The values reported above are subject to the definitions, assumptions, and limiting conditions set forth in the accompa nying report of which this 
summary is a part. No party other than Banco Popular de Puerto Rico may use or rely on the information, opinions, and conclusions contained in 
the report. It is assumed that the users of the report have read the entire report, including all of the definitions, assumptions, and limiting 
conditions contained therein. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions 2 
Extraordinary Assumptions and Hypothetical Conditions 
The value conclusions are subject to the following extraordinary assumptions that may affect the assignment 
results. An extraordinary assumption is uncertain information accepted as fact. If the assumption is found to 
be false as of the effective date of the appraisal, we reserve the right to modify our value conclusions. 
1. The subject property has a fueling dock and four fuel storage tanks located on site; including three diesel 
and one gasoline. There were no signs of contamination during our inspection and we have assumed that 
there is no adverse envi ronmental i nnpact i n connection with the existi ng fuel equi pment used on the 
subject property. 
2. The parking garage at the subject slightly encroaches on the neighboring property to the immediate 
northwest. This land is owned by the Government of the Virgin Islands and we have assumed that no claim 
will arise from the encroachments. 
3. For this analysis, we have valued the going concern interest in the subject property and have allocated the 
value of the personal property from the value of the real property. We were provided with financial 
statments from ownership that indicates the depreciated book value of these assets. It is beyond our scope 
to value these assets in use; therefore, we have assumed that the book values of teh personal property 
items shown in the statments provided by ownership are reasonably accurate for the purpose of this 
allocation exercise. 
The value conclusions are based on the following hypothetical conditions that may affect the assignment 
results. A hypothetical condition is a condition contrary to known fact on the effective date of the appraisal 
but is supposed for the purpose of analysis. 
1. No hypothetical conditions were employed in this analysis. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
General Information 3 
General Information 
Identification of Subject 
The subject is an existing 250-slip marina with 5 commercial buildings containing a mixture of retail 
and office space types. The buildings contain 48,661 square feet of rentable area and were 
constructed in multiple stages; with the majority of the construction completed in 1993. The 
commercial space is 85% leased as of the effective appraisal date. The marina docks were constructed 
in multiple phases between 1991-1995 and are 52.8% occupied as of the effective appraisal date. The 
total site area is 2.76 acres or 120,226 square feet, which includes 0.64 acre or 27,878 square feet, 
that is re-claimed land. The property also includes 3.2 acres of seabed under the marina dock 
structures which is leased to the property owner from the Government of the Virgin Islands. The legal 
description of the property is shown below. 
Property Identification 
Property Name IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Address 18A-1, 18-61,18-B and 18-W Remainder Estate Smith Bay 
East End Quarter, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 
Parcel ID 1-07702-0135-00, 1-07702-0134-00, 1-07702-0133-00, and 1-07702-0198-00 
Owner of Record IGY-AYH ST. Thomas Holdings, LLC 
Legal Description Parcel Nos. 18A-1 Remainder, 18B-1 Remainder, 18B Remainder Estate and 18-W 
Estate Smith Bay, Nos. 1,2 and 3 East End Quarter, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands 
Sale History 
The most recent closed sale of the subject is summarized as follows: 
Sale Date January 19, 2007 
Seller MOF VI Limited Partnership 
Buyer IGY-AYH ST. Thomas Holdings, LLC 
Sale Price $25,500,000 
Recording Instrument Number document number 2007000531 
Expenditures Since Purchase Unknown 
The sale price is consistent with our market value conclusion considering the date of the transaction 
and the market fluctuation since that time. To the best of our knowledge, no sale or transfer of 
ownership has taken place within a three-year period prior to the effective appraisal date. 
Pending Transactions 
To the best of our knowledge, the property is not subject to an agreement of sale or an option to buy, 
nor is it listed for sale, as of the effective appraisal date. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
irr. 
General Information 4 
Purpose of the Appraisal 
The purpose of the appraisal is to develop an opinion of the market value of the leased fee (going 
concern) interest in the property as of the effective date of the appraisal, November 25, 2015. The 
date of the report is December 15, 2015. The appraisal is valid only as of the stated effective date or 
dates. 
Basis of Value 
Market value is defined as: 
""The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all 
conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and 
assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of 
a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 
• Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 
• Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own 
best interests; 
• A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 
• Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements 
comparable thereto; and 
• The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or 
creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale."" 
(Source: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 12, Chapter!, Part 34.42[g]; also Interagency Appraisal and 
Evaluation Guidelines, Federal Register, 75 FR 77449, December 10, 2010, page 77472) 
Definition of Property Rights Appraised 
Leased fee interest is defined as, ""A freehold (ownership interest) where the possessory interest has 
been granted to another party by creation of a contractual landlord-tenant relationship (i.e., a lease)."" 
Lease is defined as, ""A contract in which rights to use and occupy land or structures are transferred by 
the owner to another for a specified period of time in return for a specified rent."" 
(Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 
2010) 
Definition of Going-Concern Premise 
Going-Concern Premise is defined as, ""one of the premises under which the total assets of a business 
can be valued; the assumption that a company is expected to continue operating well into the future 
(usually indefinitely). Under the going-concern premise, the value of a business as a going concern is 
equal to the sum of the value of the tangible assets and the value of the intangible assets, which may 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
General Information 5 
include the value of excess profit, where asset values are derived consistently with the going-concern 
premise."" 
(Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 
2010) 
Intended Use and User 
The intended use of the appraisal is for Commercial credit administration. The client and intended 
user is Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The appraisal is not intended for any other use or user. No party 
or parties other than Banco Popular de Puerto Rico may use or rely on the information, opinions, and 
conclusions contained in this report. 
Applicable Requirements 
This appraisal is intended to conform to the requirements of the following: 
• Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP); 
• Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal 
Institute; 
• The Principles of Appraisal Practice and Code of Ethics of the American Society of Appraisers 
• The RICS Valuation Professional Standards; 
• The International Valuation Standards of the IVSC; 
• Applicable jurisdictional regulations; 
• Appraisal requirements of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and 
Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), revised June 7, 1994; 
• Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines issued December 10, 2010; 
• Appraisal guidelines of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. 
Prior Services 
USPAP requires appraisers to disclose to the client any other services they have provided in 
connection with the subject property in the prior three years, including valuation, consulting, property 
management, brokerage, or any other services. The RICS Red Book also contains requirements for 
valuers to disclose previous involvement with the subject property within twelve months. We have 
not performed any services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the 
subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this 
assignment. 
Competency 
We hereby confirm that we possess adequate knowledge and skills to perform the assignment 
competently, including an understanding area/regional market conditions, and factors which pertain 
to the property type in question. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
General Information 6 
Independence 
We hereby confirm that we have no conflicts of interest or material involvement in the property which 
is the subject of this valuation; and that we are acting as unbiased, independent, external valuers. 
RICS Valuer Registration 
We confirm that we are in compliance with the RICS Valuer Registration program, which is mandatory 
for RICS members in the Caribbean region. 
Currency 
Unless otherwise stated, all financial figures in this report are expressed in United States Dollars. 
Scope of Work 
To determine the appropriate scope of work for the assignment, we considered the intended use of 
the appraisal, the needs of the user, the complexity of the property, and other pertinent factors. Our 
concluded scope of work is described below. 
Valuation Methodology 
Appraisers usually consider the use of three approaches to value when developing a market value 
opinion for real property. These are the cost approach, sales comparison approach, and income 
capitalization approach. Use of the approaches in this assignment is summarized as follows: 
Approaches to Value 
Approach 
Applicability to Subject Use in Assignment 
Cost Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized 
Sales Comparison Approach Not Applicable Not Utilized 
Income Capitalization Approach Applicable Utilized 
The income capitalization approach is the most reliable valuation method for the subject due to the 
following: 
• The probable buyer of the subject would base a purchase price decision primarily on the 
income generating potential of the property and an anticipated rate of return. 
• Sufficient market data regarding income, expenses, and rates of return, is available for 
analysis. 
The sales comparison approach is not applicable to the subject because: 
• This approach does not reflect the primary analysis undertaken by a typical investor-
purchaser. 
• There are insufficient sales of comparable properties in this market from which to derive a 
credible value conclusion. 
The cost approach is not applicable to the subject considering the following: 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
General Information 7 
• The age of the property makes estimates of accrued depreciation very subjective. 
• This approach is not typically used by market participants, except for new properties. 
Research and Analysis 
The type and extent of our research and analysis is detailed in individual sections of the report. This 
includes the steps we took to verify comparable sales, which are disclosed in the comparable sale 
profile sheets in the addenda to the report. Although we make an effort to confirm the arms-length 
nature of each sale with a party to the transaction, it is sometimes necessary to rely on secondary 
verification from sources deemed reliable. 
Inspection 
Mark J. Weathers conducted an interior and exterior inspection of the property on November 25, 
2015. James V. Andrews, MAI, CRE, FRICS, ASA, CVA, also conducted an interior and exterior 
inspection on November 25, 2015. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
irr. 
Area Analysis 8 
Economic Analysis 
Area Analysis 
Location 
The U.S. Virgin Islands are located in the Caribbean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, about 90 miles (140 
km) east of Puerto Rico and immediately west of the British Virgin Islands. 
ZXICIP 
8F1 171- 
GUATEMALA 
HONDURAS 
NICARAk A IA 
_ PANAMA 
OSTA 
111L 
AR, 
h. 
...""666•• VFNF71.1F1 A 
Ii 
kW. HAY 
!RIR 
- A it nl 
The territory consists of four main islands: Saint Thomas, Saint John, Saint Croix, and Water Island, as 
well as several dozen smaller islands. The combined land area of the islands is roughly twice the size of 
Washington, D.C. 
Evan 
tn.x, 
&on 
' nen. 
Mann. c, 
bJ 
N For.t;tt St. - -114.1knot 
Masi Thomas • I , 
Senna. 
I--
ch.Hou. 
H. 
Wand t St Janus 
Capetla 
6 m Wan. 
13.co 
srZ' 
Mamma 
bemoans, St_ Gem 
anal Sr_ Thomas (44 main) 
Ss not shown co solo 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Area Analysis 9 
1 
A mild tropical climate, scenic beauty, and status as a U.S. territory make Virgin Islands appealing for 
vacationers from United States and Europe. The islands host over 2.5 million visitors per year, most of 
whom arrive by cruise ship, and tourism is the dominant economic engine of the islands, accounting 
for roughly 70 percent of the total gross territorial product. 
Each district has its own distinct landscape, mix and intensity of land uses, cultural identity, and 
prospects for future development. St Thomas is home to the capital and the territory's largest city, 
Charlotte Amalie, which has an estimated population of roughly 19,000 persons. St Thomas is the 
primary center for resort tourism, government, finance, trade, and commerce, but its rugged 
landscape limits the land available for agriculture and other types of land-intensive development. 
Charlotte Amalie is also home to a major deepwater harbor that is along major shipping routes to the 
Panama Canal, and it is just east of the Cyril E King International Airport — one of the busiest airports in 
Caribbean. St. Thomas has two cruise ship docks, and is the most frequented cruise ship port in the 
Caribbean. 
The island of St John is just under 3 miles to the east of St Thomas. Cruz Bay is located on the western 
coast of the island and serves as its primary port and link to St Thomas. Nearly two thirds of St John is 
owned by the National Park Service and is off-limits to commercial development. 
St Croix is largest of the three islands, in both land area and population. It is roughly 45 miles to the 
south of St Thomas. Its primary towns are Christiansted and Frederiksted. Overall the island is flatter 
and has more land available for additional agricultural, commercial and residential development than 
St Thomas. St Croix is also the primary manufacturing center for the Virgin Islands, with rum 
distilleries, a major watch-assembly plant, and; until February 2012, one of the world's largest 
petroleum refineries (which recently ceased refining operations). 
History 
The Virgin Islands were originally settled by the Ciboney, Carib, and Arawaks. The islands were named 
by Christopher Columbus on his second voyage in 1493 for Saint Ursula and her virgin followers. Over 
the next three hundred years, the islands were held by many European powers, including Spain, 
England, the Netherlands, France, and Denmark-Norway. The Danes developed the islands with 
plantation estates, and the estates boundaries are still used in legal descriptions for land to this day. 
The U.S. took possession of the islands on March 31, 1917 and the territory was renamed the Virgin 
Islands of the United States. U.S. citizenship was granted to the inhabitants of the islands in 1927. 
Government 
The U.S. Virgin Islands are an organized, unincorporated United States territory. Even though they are 
U.S. citizens, Virgin Islands residents cannot vote in presidential elections. Virgin Islands residents, 
however, are able to vote in presidential primary elections for delegates to the Democratic National 
Convention and the Republican National Convention. 
The main political parties in the U.S. Virgin Islands are the Democratic Party of the Virgin Islands, the 
Independent Citizens Movement, and the Republican Party of the Virgin Islands. Additional candidates 
run as independents. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Area Analysis 10 
At the national level, the U.S. Virgin Islands elects a delegate to Congress from its at-large 
congressional district. However, the elected delegate, while able to vote in committee, cannot 
participate in floor votes. 
At the territorial level, 15 senators-seven from the district of Saint Croix, seven from the district of 
Saint Thomas and Saint John, and one senator at-large who must be a resident of Saint John-are 
elected for two-year terms to the unicameral Virgin Islands Legislature. The U.S. Virgin Islands has 
elected a territorial governor every four years since 1970. Previous governors were appointed by the 
President of the United States. 
Population and Employment 
In 2008, the residential population of the Virgin Islands peaked at an estimated 115,852 persons. This 
follows five years of slow but steady growth of 1.0%, slightly slower than the U.S. annual average of 
1.15%. Since 2008, population levels have fallen each year, to the 2014 estimated population of 
103,961 persons. 
Among the three islands, St Croix and St Thomas are nearly equally populous with St John having less 
than 4 percent of the total population of the Virgin Islands. 
USVI Economic Indicators 
2005 	2006 	2007 	2008 	2009 	2010 	2011 	2012 	2013 	2014 	5 Yr Ann Growth 
Population 	111,470 	113,689 	114,743 	115,852 	107,343 	106,405 	105,784 	105,169 	104,563 	103,961 	-0.6% 
St Croix 	54,635 	55,722 	56,239 	56,783 	52,612 	50,601 	50,247 	50,005 	49,938 	49,656 	-1.1% 
St. Thoma s 	52,528 	53,574 	54,070 	54,592 	50,583 	51,634 	51,266 	51,051 	50,610 	50,316 	-0.1% 
St. John 	4,307 	4,393 	4,434 	4,477 	4,148 	4,170 	4,134 	4,113 	4,015 	3,989 	-0.8% 
Civilian labor force 	51,159 	51,159 	52,670 	52,630 	52,861 	51,424 	50,729 	50,577 	47,558 	46,784 	-2.3% 
Civilian employment 	47,301 	48,640 	49,547 	49,589 	48,863 	47,272 	46,121 	44,659 	41,207 	40,687 	-3.3% 
Unemployment rate (percent) 	7.1% 	6.2% 	5.9% 	5.8% 	7.6% 	8.1% 	8.9% 	11.7% 	13.4% 	13.0% 	14.2% 
Gross Territorial Product (GTP, Millions) 	$4,457 	$4,635 	$4,836 	$4,851 	$4,583 	$4,660 	$4,351 	$3,778 	$3,792 	-4.4% 
GTP Per Capita 	$39,984 	$40,769 	$42,146 	$41,872 	$42,695 	$43,795 	$41,131 	$35,923 	$36,265 	-2.7% 
Personal income (PI) 	$2,723 	$2,777 	$2,964 	$2,606 	$2,602 	$2,704 	$2,661 	$2,586 	$2,233 	-2.9% 
Per capita personal income ($) 	$20,620 	$21,711 	$22,658 	$22,847 	$23,931 	$25,603 	$25,084 	$23,388 	$21,353 	-1.3% 
Total Exports (Millions of $1 	$10,476 	$11,627 	$12,962 	$17,249 	$9,728 	$11,930 	$13,314 	$2,263 	$1,285 	$1,671 	-16.6% 
Refined petroleum 	$9,376 	$10,463 	$11,242 	$13,592 	$8,327 	$9,759 	$10,486 	$932 	$32 	$7 	-20.0% 
Value of construction permits (Millions $) 	$390.20 	$442.70 	$266.10 	$273.30 	$261.80 	$187.20 	$179.10 	$141.40 	$156.60 	$201.40 	-4.6% 
St. Thomas/St. John 	$274.30 	$217.70 	$172.90 	$183.80 	$79.00 	$80.60 	$87.90 	$85.10 	$114.80 	$142.20 	16.0% 
St. Croix 	$115.90 	$225.00 	$93.20 	$89.50 	$175.90 	$106.50 	$91.10 	$56.20 	$41.80 	$59.20 	-13.3% 
Source: Vi Bureau of Economic Research 
The territory's Labor Force has also declined slightly, and there has been a steady increase in the 
unemployment rate; which was further affected by the closure of the Hovensa oil and gas refinery in 
2012. Note that there was a slight dip in unemployement in 2014. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Area Analysis 11 
Population and Employment 
125,000 
115,000 
105,000 
95,000 
85,000 
75,000 
65,000 
55,000 
45,000 
35,000 
25,000 
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 
_ 16.0% 
14.0% 
- 12.0% 
10.0% 
_ 8.0% 
6.0% 
- 4.0% 
- 2.0% 
_ 0.0% 
—Population Civilian employment --A—Unemployment Rate 
Industry 
The territory relies heavily on tourism for economic stability. Additional industries include the 
production and export of rum; and until early 2012, the production of refined petroleum products (the 
Hovensa Refinery in St. Croix closed in early 2012). The Gross Domestic Product peaked in 2007 at 
$4.85 million, and declined to $4.14 million in 2012, and further declined to $3.79 million for 2013. 
Personal income per capita is also in decline from over $25,000 in 2010 and 2011 to just over $21,000 
in 2013. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
El 
Area Analysis 12 
Economic Indicators 
$45,000 
$40,000 
$35,000 
$30,000 
$25,000 
$20,000 
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 
-GTP Per Capita 
Per capita personal income ($) 
-41-Gross Territorial Product (GTP, Millions) 
$5,000 
$4,500 
$4,000 
$3,500 
$3,000 
$2,500 
$2,000 
The closure of the Hovensa refinery, which was one of the territory's largest employers, also had a 
significant impact on exports which were prevously dominated by petrolium products. Otherwise, the 
territory predominently relies on the tourism industry to support the economy. 
Commerce and Trade (Millions of $ Unless Otherwise Noted) 
5-Yr Annual 
2007 	2008 	2009 	2010 	2011 	2012 	2013 	2014 Growth 
Total exports 	$12,961.8 	$17,249.4 	$9,728.3 	$11,929.5 	$13,313.5 	$2,263.2 	$1,284.8 	$1,671.4 	-16.6% 
To U.S. 	$12,182.2 	$14,496.3 	$8,495.3 	$9,992.5 	$10,994.8 	$1,377.7 	$265.4 	$225.8 	-19.5% 
Refined petroleum 	$11,242.1 	$13,591.9 	$8,327.3 	$9,759.4 	$10,486.1 	$932.4 	$61.6 	$6.5 	-20.0% 
Other 	$940.1 	$904.4 	$168.0 	$233.1 	$508.7 	$445.3 	$233.8 	$219.3 	6.1% 
To foreign 	$779.6 	$2,753.1 	$1,233.0 	$1,937.0 	$2,318.7 	$885.5 	$1,019.4 	$1,445.6 	3.4% 
Total imports 	$12,251.0 	$17,861.3 	$10,289.9 	$12,153.9 	$13,972.7 	$2,966.7 	$2,590.1 	$3,391.8 	-13.4% 
From U.S. 	$1,261.0 	$1,214.6 	$1,139.3 	$1,548.9 	$1,767.6 	$1,719.4 	$2,119.2 	$2,144.5 	17.6% 
Crude petroleum 	$0.0 	$0.0 	$0.0 	$0.0 	$0.0 	$0.0 	$0.0 	$0.0 
Other 	$1,261.0 	$1,214.6 	$1,139.3 	$1,548.9 	$1,767.6 	$1,719.4 	$2,119.2 	$2,144.5 	17.6% 
From foreign 	$10,990.0 	$16,646.7 	$9,150.6 	$10,605.0 	$12,205.1 	$1,247.3 	$470.9 	$1,247.3 	-17.3% 
Crude petroleum 	$8,204.7 	$12,045.8 	$7,085.9 	$7,721.7 	$10,340.9 	$660.3 	$0.0 	$660.3 	-18.1% 
Other 	$2,785.3 	$4,600.9 	$2,064.7 	$2,883.3 	$1,864.2 	$587.0 	$470.9 	$1,247.3 	-7.9% 
Rum exports to U.S. (thous. of P.L.) 	$28,725.1 	$31,478.7 	$38,445.3 	$40,045.1 	$35,801.2 	$82,520.0 	$68,335.4 	$59,418.5 	10.9% 
Watch exports to U.S. (thousands) 	$251.4 	$183.6 	$75.0 	$52.0 	$52.7 	$55.6 	$60.0 	$76.8 	0.5% 
Ocean freight imports (thousands of tons) 	1,092.0 	1,080.0 	1,065.0 	1,091.0 	1,157.0 	1,975.0 	931.0 	866.0 	-3.7% 
To St. Thomas/St. John 	851.0 	774.0 	685.0 	612.0 	720.0 	1,199.0 	564.0 	558.0 	-3.7% 
To St. Croix (excluding petroleum) 	241.0 	306.0 	380.0 	479.0 	436.0 	776.0 	367.0 	308.0 	-3.8% 
Source: Vi Bureau of Economic Research 
irr 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Area Analysis 
13 
$20,000.0 
$18,000.0 
$16,000.0 
$14,000.0 
$12,000.0 
$10,000.0 
$8,000.0 
$6,000.0 
$4,000.0 
$2,000.0 
$0.0 
USVI Commerce 
$6,000 
- $5,000 
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
- $4,000 
$3,000 
- $2,000 
- $1,000 
$0 
-Total Exports (Millions $) Total Imports (Millions $) -ik-GTP (Millions $) 
Over ninety percent of non-farm jobs are in the service providing industries, with the remaining jobs 
being in goods producing industries. Government, trade, transportation and utilities, and leisure and 
hospitality remain the industries with the largest number of jobs. 
These three sectors account for 69 percent of all jobs. Professional and business services, construction 
and financial activities account for approximately 9 percent, 4 percent and 6 percent respectively. 
Manufacturing and information sectors account for about 2 percent each, while educational and 
health services account for 6 percent. Other services account for the remainder of jobs. 
Tourism 
The total number of visitor arrivals to the territory reached over 2.8 million in 2014, including both air 
and cruise ship arrivals. This represents 4.2% growth over the prior year. Total visitor expenditures 
are also growing, with annual growth in excess of 6% each of the last three years. 
USVI Visitor Expenditures 
2005 	2006 	2007 	2008 	2009 	2010 	2011 	2012 	2013 	2014 
Total Visitors (Thousands) 	2,601.9 	2,570.7 	2,606.2 	2,435.2 	2,245.0 	2,548.7 	2,687.9 	2,642.1 	2,701.5 	2,814.2 
Growth 	-1.2% 	1.4% 	-6.6% 	-7.8% 	13.5% 	5.5% 	-1.7% 	2.2% 	4.2% 
Total Visitor Expenditures 	$1,431.6 	$1,467.6 	$1,512.6 	$1,157.1 	$1,021.3 	$1,012.5 	$1,085.3 	$1,152.8 	$1,232.2 
Growth 	2.5% 	3.1% 	-23.5% 	-11.7% 	-0.9% 	7.2% 	6.2% 	6.9% 
From Stopover Tourists 	$863.8 	$883.2 	$929.8 	$686.4 	$687.4 	$678.2 	$740.6 	$784.7 	$851.0 
Day Trip Excursionists 	$27.2 	$25.6 	$27.7 	$29.7 	$28.6 	$28.0 	$35.4 	$35.4 	$36.1 
From Cruise Ship Passengers 	$540.6 	$558.8 	$555.2 	$441.0 	$305.3 	$306.3 	$311.8 	$332.7 	$345.1 
Source: Vi Bureau of Economic Research 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
El 
Area Analysis 
14 
$1,000.0 
$900.0 
$800.0 
$700.0 
$600.0 
2 
$5000 
$400.0 
$300.0 
$200.0 
USVI Visitor Expenditures 
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 
4,000.0 
- 3,800.0 
- 3,600.0 
- 3,400.0 -,,., 
-0 
- 3,200.0 04/ 
0 
3,000.0 g 
-  n 
2,800.0 0 
In 
- 2,600.0 $. 
- 2,400.0 
- 2,200.0 
2,000.0 
- -From Stopover Tourists (Mills) From Cruise Visitors (Mills) Number of Total Visitors 
It is apparent, however, that the amount of visitor expenditures from cruise ship passengers has not 
increased linearly with arrivals since 2009; whereby the ratio was more linear in prior years. Cruise 
passenger arrivals grew 4.94% to over 2.08 million in 2014 following growth of 5.37% in the prior year. 
Total expenditures from cruise ship visitors grew 3.73% to over $345 million in 2013, following growth 
of 6.7% in 2012. 
Cruise Ship Passenger Arrivals 
2005 	2006 	2007 	2008 	2009 	2010 	2011 	2012 	2013 	2014 
St. Thomas / St. John 	1,909,984 	1,901,275 	1,917,371 	1,754,557 	1,507,623 	1,751,328 	1,887,096 	1,790,550 	1,886,647 	1,979,926 
Growth 	-0.46% 	0.85% 	-8.49% 	-14.07% 	16.16% 	7.75% 	-5.12% 	5.37% 	4.94% 
St. Croix 	54,502 	35,191 	7,146 	2,510 	105,093 	149,418 	158,186 	117,165 	116,436 	138,055 
Growth 	-35.43% 	-79.69% 	-64.88% 	4086.97% 	42.18% 	5.87% 	-25.93% 	-0.62% 	18.57% 
Total 	1,912,539 	1,903,533 	1,917,878 	1,757,067 	1,582,264 	1,858,946 	2,008,991 	1,904,468 	1,998,579 	2,083,890 
Growth 	-0.47% 	0.75% 	-8.38% 	-9.95% 	17.49% 	8.07% 	-5.20% 	4.94% 	4.27% 
Cruise Visitor Expenditures (Millions) 	$540.6 	$558.8 	$555.2 	$441.0 	$305.3 	$306.3 	$311.8 	$332.7 	$345.1 
3.37% 	-0.64% 	-20.57% 	-30.77% 	033% 	1.80% 	6.70% 	3.73% 
Source:VI Bu rea u of Economic Research 
Totals breach island include 1st and 2nd ports of call; totals for USVI include only lst port of call 
irr 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Area Analysis 
15 
USVI Cruise Ship Tourism 
2,400,000 	$800.0 - $700.0 $600.0 $500.0 $400.0 $300.0 - $200.0 
2,200,000 
2,000,000 1,800,000 
1,600,000 
1,400,000 
1,200,000 
1,000,000 	$100.0 
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 
—Cruise Passenger Arrivals Cruise Visitor Expenditures (Millions) 
In terms of stopover tourists, the U.S. Virgin Islands ranks 7th in the list of the top tourism markets in 
the Caribbean, with 2014 stay-over arrivals of about 730,000. The year 2014 indicated modest growth 
in arrivals, with 3.90% growth over the prior period. The chart below illustrates the relationship 
between arrivals and GDP. We note that the continuing downturn in GDP is likely due to negative 
influences outside the tourism sector, such as the 2012 closure of the Hovensa oil refinery in St. Croix. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
i9 
Area Analysis 16 
Stay-Over Arrivals and GDP Per Capita 
$60,000 
800,000 
780,000 
$55,000 
760,000 
$50,000 
740,000 
$45,000 
720,000 
700,000 
$40,000 
680,000 
$35,000 
660,000 
640,000 
620,000 	$30,000 
600,000 	2008 	2009 	2010 	2011 	2012 	2013 	2014 	$25,000 
683,294 	666,051 	691,194 	678,962 	737,651 	702,963 	730,367 
-Stay-Over Arrivals 
GDP Per Capita 	$41,864 	$42,712 	$43,656 	$40,557 	$35,123 	$33,375 
Source: Virgin Islands Bureau of Economic Research, WorldBank, Integra Realty Resources 
Hotel Performance 
Data from Smith Travel Research indicates 2014 occupancy for reporting hotels of 67.8%, up 3.29% 
over the prior year. The reported average daily rate (ADR) was $308.98 (up 0.51%), leading to 
Revenue Per Available Room Night (RevPar) of $209.53 (up 5.63%). 
Hotel Performance by Country - USVI 
2013 	2014 	Growth 
Sample Size (Rooms) 	1,504 
Room Nights Available (Supply) 	$1,775,819 	$1,750,284 	-1.44% 
Room Nights Sold (Demand) 	$1,145,860 	$1,186,924 	3.58% 
Occupancy 	64.5% 	67.8% 	3.29% 
Room Revenues 	$352,268,119 	$366,739,620 	4.11% 
ADR 	$307.43 	$308.98 	0.51% 
RevPar 	$198.37 	$209.53 	5.63% 
Rooms in Active Pipeline 12/31 	0 	453 
Note: Values in United States Dollars 
Source: Smith Travel Research: Note: Sa mole Size reflects the number of rooms within the STR participating hotels 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
irr. 
Area Analysis 17 
Hotel Performance 
$330.00 
$310.00 
$290.00 $270.00 
$250.00 	-maiill 
$230.00 
$210.00 
$190.00 $170.00 
$150.00 	2013 	2014 
ADR 	$307.43 	$308.98 
NEN 
RevPar 	$198.37 	$209.53 
-6-Occupancy 	64.5% 	67.8% 
Source: Smith Travel Research (STR Inc.) 
74.0% 
72.0% 
70.0% 
68.0% 
66.0% 
64.0% 
62.0% 
60.0% 
According to STR, there are 453 rooms in the active pipeline, which would add 8.6% to the existing 
room stock of 4,818 rooms. These projects include the 153-room, proposed Embassy Suites in the 
mahogany Run area, and the 300-room, proposed Hyatt Regency in Mandal Bay. In addition, a hotel 
project was recently announced on Water Island; however, the developers have not yet announced a 
brand or number of proposed rooms. 
Housing / Property 
As the supply of housing has increased in the last two decades, homeownership rates have also 
increased, although only slightly. Rates increased 1.9 percentage points between 2000 and 2010, and 
increased an additional 3.8 percentage points from 2010 to 2012. Average home prices dropped by 
11.8 percent in 2008, but then increased in 2009 and 2010 by 4 percent and 12.3 percent, 
respectively. In 2012, average home prices fell 17.4% and then rebounded in 2013 with an increase of 
22.1%. The average sales price in 2013 was $538,369. Presumably, much of the increased supply of 
new homes and condominiums has gone to non-residents and vacationers. Over the past decade, 
housing costs have accelerated at a far greater pace than resident incomes, putting home ownership 
beyond the reach of all but a few relatively wealthy islanders. 
In 2013, St. Thomas and St. John had an average home sale price of $713,183, while the average home 
sale price in St. Croix was $306,083. While prices have not caught up with what they were in 2007, St. 
Thomas and St. John have seen some recovery in the overall housing market. St. Croix, however, 
continues to suffer from the closing of the Hovensa refinery. In 2014, the average single family home 
sales price in St. Croix was $334,167, while in St. Thomas it was $909,839. 2015 year to date averages 
are show an increase in average single family home price in St. Croix and a decrease in St. Thomas and 
St. John, with averages of $414,178 and $759,811 respectively. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Area Analysis 
18 
The current situation is that the recovering housing market and general economic conditions on the 
US mainland is slowly having a positive impact in the US Virgin Islands' real estate market in terms of 
overall average home prices as well as the number of homes sold. Home sales in the territory, while 
still lower than 2007 figures, have increased annually since 2012. 
According to statistical data provided by the Multiple Listing Service, the value of real estate sales in 
the St. Thomas-St. Croix MLS grew by 54% in 2014 to nearly $200 million on 883 transactions; volume 
seen since 2008 and sales pace not seen since 2007. This growth follows 20% growth in 2013 which 
came after six years of declines. The average sales price surpassed $300,000, a level also not seen 
since 2008. 
$400,000,000 
$350,000,000 
$300,000,000 
$250,000,000 
$200,000,000 
$150,000,000 
$100,000,000 
MLS Sales Volume - St. Thomas and St. Croix 
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 
—Sales Volume Average Sale Price 
Source: St. Thomas/St. Croix MLS 
$350,000 
$340,000 
- $330,000 
$320,000 
1- $310,000 
_ $300,000 
$290,000 
- $280,000 
- $270,000 
$260,000 
$250,000 
Real Estate Ownership and Taxation 
Ownership is ""fee simple"", under the U.S. flag. There are no restrictions against purchasing solely for 
investment, and no laws dictating when, if ever, you must build on undeveloped land. It should be 
noted that for 2006 there was a reassessment, and the tax rate changed to $3.77 per $1,000 based on 
100% of assessed value (for residential property); however, there was an ongoing court challenge to 
the reassessment, and a federal injunction blocked tax bills until the issue could be resolved. As of 
December, 2013, the 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax bills have all been issued under 
the old 1999 assessed values and tax rates. This federal court injunction regarding the tax 
reassessment of VI property values had previously prevented the government from collecting property 
tax for at least four years, resulting in the government losing US$25 million a month. New assessed 
values as well as amended tax rates were released in conjunction with the 2013 tax bills in August, 
2014. Subsequent tax bills were issued at a rate of two per year until August 2015 when the 2015 bill 
were released and the Virgin Islands became current with respect to its property taxes. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
irr 
Area Analysis 19 
All real estate transactions also require a Government Transfer Tax (stamp tax), which can be paid by 
the buyer or seller. 
2% for property valued up to $350,000 
2.5% for property valued from $350,001 to $1,000,000 
3% for property valued from $1,000,001 to $5,000,000 
3.5% for property valued over $5,000,001 
Notable News and Developments 
• On January 18, 2012, it was announced that the Hovensa refinery would be permanently shut 
down. This has had a major impact causing an economic downturn on the island, leaving 1,158 
former Hovensa workers unemployed and many more employed by the company's 
contractors according to the United States Department of Labor. Recently, an auction of 
Hovensa's assets was conducted in New York City with multiple qualified bidders, and the 
assets were awarded to Limetree Bay Holdings, a subsidiary of ArcLight Capital Partners. 
Pending approval by the Virgin Islands legislature, ArcLight's operation of the oil storage 
facility will create a minimum of 80 jobs, with the possibility of more in the future. ArcLight 
indicated there could be a possibility of a limited restart of some refinery units at some point 
in the future. 
• Both the Senate and the US House of Representatives passed the Coast Guard Reauthorization 
Act, and President Obama signed the act into legislation in the fiscal year 2015 which should 
help level the charter yacht industry playing field. Prior to 1993 and the imposition of a six-
passenger limitation on US uninspected vessels, the charter yacht industry in the US Virgin 
Islands was thriving, contributing over $100 million in annual revenue and hundreds of jobs to 
the local economy. A large chunk of the industry moved to the British Virgin Islands after the 
six-passenger rule limitation was initiated by the US Government. The bill has recently been 
enacted into law, and the ability of the USVI to compete in this industry should be significantly 
improved. 
• After an extensive search and vetting process, the USVI Government has selected a group of 
local and regional investors to develop a hotel resort on Water Island, just off of St. Thomas. 
There are apparently eight hotel brands in discussions with the developers for branding the 
property. 
• A Texas-based EB-5 Regional Center has announced an EB-5 funded commercial project 
known as the Port of Mandahl Caribbean Conference Resort. When completed, the 
development is reportedly planned to include two full-service hotels, a golf course, a state of 
the art conference center, retail and commercial space, and high-end residential units. EB-5 is 
a type of economic citizenship program whereby the United States grants citizenship to 
investors of certain approved projects in areas where the economic boost is needed. Regional 
Centers are tasked with selling the investments such as limited partnerships to international 
buyers. 
• The Margaritaville (Wyndham) Vacation Club is under construction in Water Bay on the East 
End of the island of St. Thomas. The project is a renovation of the 290-room Renaissance 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
19 
Area Analysis 20 
Grand Beach Resort into 262 timeshare oriented condominium units. The first phase on this 
project was completed in September 2015 and is open, while the second phase is currently 
under construction. 
• The University of the Virgin Islands has announced plans to develop a medical school on St. 
Thomas, which will be operated in collaboration between the hospitals on St. Thomas and St. 
Croix. 
Conclusions 
Economic conditions in the U.S. Virgin Islands appear to be slower to recover than many areas of the 
region, particularly in St. Croix, where industrial development had previously been more of a focus 
than tourism The closure of the Hovensa refinery and the failure to facilitate a sale to a buyer who can 
re-open the facility as a refinery will continue to plague St. Croix until other new developments occur 
that can create new jobs. The assets of the refinery were recently sold at auction, but operating 
agreement with the USVI Government only states the buyers will use the oil storage portion in 
addition to constructing an asphalt plant on the property, which projects to only 80 jobs created in the 
immediate future. There appears to be ongoing resurgence in tourism for St. Thomas and St. John, and 
real estate activity appears to be improving; however, many businesses — even those catering to cruise 
ship passengers — continue to struggle. Our forecast is for continued improvement in arrivals and 
hotel statistics, but only gradual economic improvement for the overall territory. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
eupeN JocpeH ltpeA ueD!Jawv ADI 
- ®c ci.11gLegasiirg(97F@IIII 
; .AzniD 
j 
'Pod ' 
ii;V090N 51x10/57 
- 
'J I pe ki _. Pu015/ 
, 4.. r- • I 
• JaIDNI 
0112W 
?Mtn] 
SL1DH 
.41r 
550 al ka, 
WIA0J3 
,srmuotti 
6u!ci 
dein eaiv 
1Z 
s!sicieuv ealv 
Surrounding Area Analysis 22 
Surrounding Area Analysis 
Location 
The subject is located in the town of Red Hook in the East End area of the Island known as Estate 
Smith Bay. Red Hook is one of the three primary business districts on the island. 
Access and Linkages 
Primary access to the area is provided by Route 32 (Smith Bay Road), a major arterial that crosses the 
east end of the island in a generally east-west direction. This is the primary route through the town of 
Red Hook, one of the three major commercial centers of the island; with the others being the city of 
Charlotte Amalie and the Tutu area. Overall, vehicular access is good. 
Public transportation is provided by Safari Taxi and provides access to all relevant areas. The local 
market perceives public transportation as average compared to other areas in the region. However, 
the primary mode of transportation in this area is the automobile. 
The Red Hook Ferry Terminal offers passenger ferries and car barges on regular schedules to and from 
St. John. Passenger ferry service to the British Virgin Islands is also available. 
The Cyril E. King International Airport is located about 8.4 miles from the property; travel time is about 
25 minutes, depending on traffic conditions. The Charlotte Amalie CBD, the economic and cultural 
center of the island, is approximately 7.0 miles from the property. 
Demand Generators 
The demand for commercial space in the area of the subject is fueled by the popularity of the Red 
Hook business district. Red Hook is a centralized area serving the east end of St. Thomas, and features 
marinas, restaurants, bars, retail shops, and office space. 
The demand for office space in the area has been down due to overall economic conditions. As the 
economy continues its recovery, the demand for well-located office space will increase as well. Retail 
space; however, has seen an increase in demand in this area over the past 12-24 months as shown by 
the low vacancy in the 3 major retail properties Red Hook; American Yacht Harbor (subject), Red Hook 
Plaza and Galleria Shopping Center. 
Compared to the territory area as a whole, the local area has higher income levels. Population trends 
are similar except that the local area is growing at a faster rate than the territory. 
Land Use 
The area is suburban in character and approximately 65% developed. 
Predominant land uses are retail and office uses, with some residential users nearby. Marina use is 
also prevalent in this area. The area contains several neighborhood retail/office centers within a few 
blocks of the subject along Smith Bay Road. These include East End Plaza which is three stories and 
contains mostly office space, the aforementioned Galleria Shopping center which will is anchored by a 
newly opened gourmet grocery store, and the aforementioned Red Hook Plaza which is a two story 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Surrounding Area Analysis 23 
building with a mixture of office and retail. There are other small retail commercial buildings both 
along the waterfront and the inland side of the road; such as restaurants, bars and a convenience 
store/gas outlet. 
In addition to the drawing power of these retail users, the lvanna Eudora Kean High School is located 
approximately 1,500 feet west of the subject property. 
During the last several years, development has been predominantly of retail/office uses. The largest 
recent development in this area has been East End Plaza, which was constructed in 2008. However, 
the completion of this commercial building coincided with the downturn in the overall economy in the 
territory, and the property has struggled to reach stabilization. There is also a newly constructed, 
small commercial strip center in close proximity to the subject called Crosswinds Center that opened 
approximately two years ago. Ace Hardware is the anchor tenant in this building, while the majority of 
the other commercial bays remain vacant. 
There have also been two notable bar/restaurant openings within the past two years, both at the 
subject property. Near the subject, a Senor Frogs restaurant opened in November 2013 featuring a 
dining and nightclub atmosphere. Additionally, a tavern/restaurant called Tap & Still has opened 
approximately 450 feet southwest of the subject. A new Thai/Sushi restaurant is under construction 
within Red Hook Plaza, just west of the subject. These new establishments are indicative of the 
improving retail/commercial climate of the Red Hook area. 
Outlook and Conclusions 
The area is in the slow growth stage of its life cycle. There have been signs of increased demand as 
existing commercial space has been leasing up more rapidly over the past six months, showing the 
upside of the subject's area. We anticipate that property values will slightly increase in the near 
future. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
119 
Surrounding Area Analysis 
24 
Surrounding Area Map 
Urman Fredericks 
Terminal-Red Hook 
Vessop fik7y 
Eti 
L'""""ei.nrdgE.Rd-
birn 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina Market Analysis 25 
Marina Market Analysis 
Marinas are not at all homogenous, and the various combinations of business and physical 
components result in significantly different results for the owners and operators. The two major types 
of marinas are coastal (usually found in saltwater inland waterways that lead to an ocean port), and 
freshwater (found on lakes). Saltwater marinas tend to attract larger vessels and require a completely 
different level of maintenance. Freshwater marinas typically cater more toward day-sailors and day-
boaters who do not have personal space with which to keep their boats. 
Typical marinas in both coastal and freshwater locations can include any combination of the following 
components: 
• Wet Slips (covered and uncovered) 
• Dry Storage (land) 
• Dry Storage (stack) 
• Maintenance and Repair Yard and Services 
• Marine Dealerships (boat sales) 
• Merchandise Sales (fishing, boating, sundries) 
• Fuel Sales (gas and diesel) 
• Equipment Rental 
With regard to slip rentals (wet and dry), these spaces can be either rented (the traditional route), or 
sold as ""dockominiums"" and ""rackaminiums."" The sellout component became very popular in the last 
decade, and many marinas were converted to all or part sellout type enterprises. Part of the reason is 
that developers in recent times prefer to develop real estate for sale (condominiums or homesites) 
that surround the marina, and in turn could sell the boat spaces and then move on to another 
investment. The market for dockominiums (wet and dry) somewhat dried up during the recent 
recession, and many of the unsold units were subsequently rented instead of sold. 
Another trend of development prior to the 2008 recession was for marinas within luxury resort 
communities that also have a residential component. These include 4 and 5-star resorts in the 
subtropical USA as well as the Caribbean. Typical luxury resort developments planned in the last 
decade would include a hotel (which the developer would license to a ""branded"" operator), 
condominiums and villas for sale, home sites for sale, and recreational components such as a golf 
course and marina. The sellout types of dock spaces fit well into the business model of the developer, 
as they sell other components and license the hotel operation to a separate entity. 
Marinas also vary in size from small ""mom and pop"" or ""lifestyle"" businesses with less than 50 slips to 
large enterprises that attract institutional purchasers. Across the board, marinas are affected by 
economic downturns due to the leisure component of the boating hobby. During the last two 
recessions (2000-2003 and 2008-2009), many marinas went into foreclosure. This created difficulty for 
marinas to obtain financing. 
irr. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina Market Analysis 26 
Coastal marinas along the eastern seaboard were fairly successful until the recent recession, with 
many documenting 100% occupancy or waiting lists. This may be partly due to increased 
environmental regulation limiting dredging new bodies of water or deepening existing ones. As 
marinas are typically close to inlets leading to the sea or inland waterways, they are typically in areas 
that are rich with aquatic life. 
National Boating Trends 
Because of the age, size, design, tenancy, quality, and location of the subject, it is likely to appeal to 
investors primarily on a national or regional basis. While national factors may or may not be indicative 
of the subject's market area, the national trends exhibited are generally indicative of movement in all 
submarkets. Real estate is typically analyzed on a market-by-market basis. Published secondary data 
and market studies for the marina industry on a local or regional level are scarce. Nationwide, the 
most comprehensive statistical reference guide for the marina industry is the Recreational Boating 
Statistical Abstract, published annually by the National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA). 
The most recent publication reports 2014 data. 
According to NMMA, the boating industry generated $35.4 billion in sales and services in 2013, a 3.5% 
decline from 2013. This represented the first year of decline after three consecutive years of growth 
following the low point in 2010, of $30.4 billion, from the ""great recession."" The peak occurred in 2006 
at $39.5 billion. 
Of the 242.5 million adults living in the United States in 2014, 35.7%, or 87.3 million people, 
participated in recreational boating; a 1.8% decline from 2013. This is within the range of participation 
over the past four years which varies from 34.8% to 37.8% of the population. 
New boat sales peaked at 912,130 in 2006, but have declined since that date with 2014 sales at 
534,500 units, an increase of 0.44% from 2013. Before the recession in 2007, fuel prices increased, 
followed by increased unemployment and tightening credit. Luxury and leisure goods such as boats 
are typically the first things to be put on the back burner as people become more discretionary with 
their income. As a result, pre-owned power boat represented 64% of all boat sales during 2014, and 
new boat dealers have had to compete. 
While boating participation declined recently, boat registrations have fallen. Boat registrations were 
up 0.08% to 12 million in 2014 versus 11.99 million in 2013. Florida led all states in boat registrations 
for 2014 followed by California, Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin, in that order. 
The demographic of boat owners is largely middle class. In 2014, 95% of registered mechanically 
propelled boats were 26 feet or less, indicating more affordable, entry-level, trailerable boats. The 
majority (71.5%) of boat owners earn an average household income under $100,000. Over 60% of 
boating participants were between the age of 31 and 64 which signifies that the increase in boating 
population is younger. 
National Marina Industry 
Every December/January, Marina Dock Age magazine publishes an issue dedicated to trends in the 
marina industry. An article from the most recent issue in December 2014 indicates that the majority of 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina Market Analysis 27 
marinas and boatyards continue to improve net profits, overall revenues, and occupancy rates, with 
82% expecting stable or increasing occupancy rates. 
The table that follows details marina occupancy rates for 2014. 
Marina Occupancy Rates - 2014 
Occupancy Rate Range 
Less than 50% 	50% - 74% 	75 - 84% 85% - 94% 	95% - 99% 	100% 
Ownership Type/ Size 	%of Respondents 
Government Owner 	4.4% 	22.2% 	17.8% 	17.8% 	22.2% 	13.3% 
Corporate Owner 	4.0% 	32.0% 	18.0% 	14.0% 	25.0% 	7.0% 
Private Owner 	2.0% 	16.0% 	19.0% 	31.0% 	14.0% 	13.0% 
Small (1 - 99 Slips) 	5.0% 	13.0% 	11.0% 	23.0% 	15.0% 	32.0% 
Medium (100 - 249 slips) 	5.0% 	17.0% 	21.0% 	26.0% 	21.0% 	10.0% 
Large (250- 749 slips) 	0.0% 	19.0% 	21.0% 	30.0% 	17.0% 	13.0% 
Very Large (Over 750 slips) 	0.0% 	27.8% 	16.6% 	27.8% 	27.8% 	0.0% 
Overall 	3.0% 	17.0% 	18.0% 	26.0% 	18.0% 	15.0% 
Marina Dock Age publishes statistical information based on the percentage of overall respondents. 
The subject is under private ownership and has 98 boat slips which are expected to be increased to 
108 slips. The largest majority (31%) of private owner marinas reported 85% to 94% occupancy rates. 
Overall, 58% of private owners reported occupancy rates of 85% to 100%. The largest majority (32%) 
of small marinas reported occupancy rates of 100%, with 70% of small marinas reporting occupancy of 
85% to 100%. The largest majority of medium marinas (26%) reported occupancy rates of 85% to 94%, 
with 57% of medium marinas reporting occupancy of 85% to 100%. 
The table that follows details boat slip and service rate changes in 2014 over 2013. 
Slip/Service Rate Changes -2014 Over 2013 
Decreased 	Stayed Same 	Increased 
Marina Size 	% of Respondents 
Small (1 - 99 Slips) 	1.9% 	56.6% 	41.5% 
Medium (100 - 249 slips) 	1.0% 	62.0% 	37.0% 
Large (250 - 749 slips) 	1.3% 	53.2% 	45.5% 
Very Large (Over 750 slips) 	0.0% 	28.0% 	72.0% 
Overall 	1.0% 	55.0% 	44.0% 
The majority of marinas kept rates the same between 2013 and 2014. 
The table that follows details rate changes by service type. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
EP 
Marina Market Analysis 28 
Product/Service Revenues - 2014 Over 2013 
Decreased 	Stayed Same 	Increased 
Service 	% of Respondents 
Sailing! Training School 	4.0% 	48.0% 	48.0% 
Cabin/Campground/RV 	0.0% 	35.0% 	65.0% 
Event Services/Venue 	8.0% 	40.0% 	52.0% 
Tour Boat/Charter Fishing/Water Taxi 	9.0% 	45.5% 	45.5% 
Water Toy Rental 	12.0% 	18.0% 	70.0% 
Boat Rental 	12.3% 	16.3% 	61.4% 
Boat CI ub 	13.0% 	48.0% 	39.0% 
Pumpout 	8.0% 	65.0% 	27.0% 
Used Boat Sales/Brokerage 	21.0% 	32.0% 	47.0% 
New Boat Sales/Brokerage 	18.0% 	27.0% 	55.0% 
Self-Service Repair 	7.3% 	76.4% 	16.3% 
Haul-Out/Winterization Services 	17.8% 	54.6% 	27.6% 
Boat Mai ntenance/Repair 	27.0% 	30.0% 	43.0% 
Ship/Convenience Store 	21.5% 	36.7% 	41.8% 
Commercial/Retail Lease Space 	4.4% 	54.4% 	41.2% 
Restaurant 	11.0% 	28.0% 	61.0% 
Fuel 	26.5% 	18.0% 	55.5% 
Launch Ramp 	8.7% 	57.6% 	33.7% 
Moorings 	11.0% 	36.0% 	53.0% 
Dry Storage 	15.0% 	37.0% 	48.0% 
Transient SI i ps 	17.0% 	35.0% 	48.0% 
Leased Slips 	16.0% 	28.0% 	56.0% 
The subject has campground/RV pad sites and will also include cabins with 65% of respondents 
indicating increases in their revenues for this department. The subject has dry (land) storage with 48% 
of respondents indicating increases in this department. The subject has leased slips with 56% of 
respondents indicating increases in this department. 
The table that follows summarizes marina expenses by age of the marina. 
Marina Expenses -2014 Over 2013 
Decreased 	Stayed Same 	Increased 
Facility Age 	% of Respondents 
New (Less than 7 Years) 	15.0% 	40.0% 	43.0% 
Medium (8 - 35 Years) 	8.0% 	27.0% 	65.0% 
Old (36+ Years) 	6.0% 	22.0% 	72.0% 
Overall 	8.0% 	25.0% 	67.0% 
The subject is 21-25 years old. The majority (72%) of marinas over 36 years of age indicated increases 
in operating expenses. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina Market Analysis 29 
The table that follows details whether or not marinas will post a gross profit for 2014, based on 
marina size. 
Marina Gross Profit - Will Report a Gross Profit 
No 	Do Not Know 	Yes 
Marina Size 	% of Respondents 
Small (1 - 99 Slips) 	19.0% 	17.0% 	64.0% 
Medium (100 - 249 slips) 	16.0% 	14.0% 	70.0% 
Large (250 - 749 slips) 	9.2% 	14.5% 	76.3% 
Very Large (Over 750 slips) 	11.0% 	11.0% 	78.0% 
Overall 	14.5% 	14.5% 	71.0% 
The majority of small marinas (64%) reported that they would report a gross profit in 2014. The 
majority of medium marinas (70%) reported that they would report a gross profit in 2014. 
The table that follows details changes in gross profit in 2014 over 2013. 
Marina Gross Profit - 2014 Over 2013 
Decreased 	Stayed Same 	Increased 
Ownership Type/ Size/ Age 	% of Respondents 
Government Owner 	9.0% 	34.0% 	57.0% 
Corporate Owner 	17.8% 	28.6% 	53.6% 
Private Owner 	22.4% 	24.5% 	53.1% 
Overall 	19.2% 	28.8% 	52.0% 
New (Less than 7 Years) 	53.8% 	50.0% 	68.0% 
Medium (8 - 35 Years) 	21.5% 	20.0% 	0.0% 
Old (36+ Years) 	24.7% 	30.0% 	32.0% 
The majority (53.1%) of private owner reported that gross profit increased in 2014. The majority (32%) 
of marinas over 36 years old reported that gross profit increased in 2014. 
Conclusion 
The majority of respondents indicated stable to increasing occupancy rates in 2014 over 2013. Most 
respondents had an occupancy rate above 85%. Most respondents also indicated increased revenues. 
These are all positive indications for the marina industry. 
An article in Marina Dock Trends states that the market is improving for marina properties. The article 
reports that pre-recession, marina capitalization rates were around 5% to 6%. Post-recession through 
May 2014, capitalization rates were around 10%. Since May 2014, capitalization rates for marinas 
began decreasing. 
Though the boating industry experienced a decline in revenue and participation during the recession, 
demand for slips far exceeds the current supply. Many industry experts as well as local brokers in 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
irr 
Marina Market Analysis 30 
marina sales have indicated that now is a good time to invest in a marina, despite the previous 
recession and limited financing. 
Competitive Marinas 
The most significant supply and demand indicators for the subject are rental and occupancy rates 
experienced by directly competing properties. The operation of a pleasure craft marina provides 
revenue sources which include a mix of various rental, sales and services for the pleasure craft 
operators. Principle revenue stream for pleasure craft marinas includes in-water slips, fuel sales, and 
building rent. 
The subject's asking and average contract rates are shown in the table that follows. The current 
operator is leasing the marina slips by linear feet of vessel length. We have then converted this rental 
income into a rental rate per linear foot of dock space. The subject offers slip rental on a daily, weekly, 
monthly, seasonal and annual basis. The contracted rental rates represent a blend of these rates, from 
daily tenants to long term tenants on annual leases. According to management, approximately 60% of 
the occupants at any given time are seasonal or annual tenants. 
Marina Rent Roll 
Total 	Annual 	Average 
# of 	Average LF 	Annual LF 	Total LF 	Occupancy 	Total Rental 	Monthly Rental 
Year 	Slips 	per Slip 	Available 	Occupied 	Rate 	Revenue 	Rate/LF 
2010 	105 	53.29 	2,042,170 	1,379,235 	67.5% 	$1,551,721 	$34.22 
2011 	105 	53.18 	2,038,110 	1,298,157 	63.7% 	$1,490,744 	$34.93 
2012 	105 	54.24 	2,078,880 	1,155,377 	55.6% 	$1,290,526 	$33.97 
2013 	105 	54.10 	2,073,200 	1,206,388 	58.2% 	$1,362,951 	$34.36 
2014 	105 	54.10 	2,073,200 	1,233,672 	59.5% 	$1,513,100 	$37.31 
2015 (Annualized) 	105 	54.10 	2,073,200 	1,172,976 	56.6% 	$1,438,110 	$37.29 
Average 	105 	54 	2,063,127 	1,240,968 	60.1% 	$1,441,192 	$35.35 
We weren't provided with a current rent roll for the marina slips but we were provided with monthly 
historical occupancy and rental rate data. With the transient nature of marina tenants, a historical 
rent and occupancy figures are a more accurate indication of the income properties of the marina. 
Rental rates at the subject, and in this market, are based on a rate per linear foot of vessel length. As 
discussed earlier, the subject contains 105 wet slips with a total of 5,680 linear feet of rentable dock 
space, which indicates a total of 2,073,200 rentable linear feet per year. 
As of the effective valuation date, the subject marina has experienced an overall occupancy rate of 
56.3% for the year to date 2015. We have looked at occupancy rates on an average, annual basis due 
to the seasonal characteristics of this property type in this market. Again, due to the transient nature 
of the tenants in this property type and the short term nature of the leases which can range from daily 
to annually, the overall occupancy rate will be lower than other commercial property types such as 
lodging, multifamily, retail and office. The subject's current occupancy rate is slightly lower than 
historical rates, but the property is considered to be at stabilized occupancy. 
The weighted average contract rate is $37.29 per linear foot per month for the year to date 2015, 
which equates to an average contract rate of $447.50 per linear foot per year. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina Market Analysis 30 
marina sales have indicated that now is a good time to invest in a marina, despite the previous 
recession and limited financing. 
Competitive Marinas 
The most significant supply and demand indicators for the subject are rental and occupancy rates 
experienced by directly competing properties. The operation of a pleasure craft marina provides 
revenue sources which include a mix of various rental, sales and services for the pleasure craft 
operators. Principle revenue stream for pleasure craft marinas includes in-water slips, fuel sales, and 
building rent. 
The subject's asking and average contract rates are shown in the table that follows. The current 
operator is leasing the marina slips by linear feet of vessel length. We have then converted this rental 
income into a rental rate per linear foot of dock space. The subject offers slip rental on a daily, weekly, 
monthly, seasonal and annual basis. The contracted rental rates represent a blend of these rates, from 
daily tenants to long term tenants on annual leases. According to management, approximately 60% of 
the occupants at any given time are seasonal or annual tenants. 
Marina Rent Roll 
Total 	Annual 	Average 
# of 	Average LF 	Annual LF 	Total LF 	Occupancy 	Total Rental 	Monthly Rental 
Year 	Slips 	per Slip 	Available 	Occupied 	Rate 	Revenue 	Rate/LF 
2010 	105 	53.29 	2,042,170 	1,379,235 	67.5% 	$1,551,721 	$34.22 
2011 	105 	53.18 	2,038,110 	1,298,157 	63.7% 	$1,490,744 	$34.93 
2012 	105 	54.24 	2,078,880 	1,155,377 	55.6% 	$1,290,526 	$33.97 
2013 	105 	54.10 	2,073,200 	1,206,388 	58.2% 	$1,362,951 	$34.36 
2014 	105 	54.10 	2,073,200 	1,233,672 	59.5% 	$1,513,100 	$37.31 
2015 (Annualized) 	105 	54.10 	2,073,200 	1,172,976 	56.6% 	$1,438,110 	$37.29 
Average 	105 	54 	2,063,127 	1,240,968 	60.1% 	$1,441,192 	$35.35 
We weren't provided with a current rent roll for the marina slips but we were provided with monthly 
historical occupancy and rental rate data. With the transient nature of marina tenants, a historical 
rent and occupancy figures are a more accurate indication of the income properties of the marina. 
Rental rates at the subject, and in this market, are based on a rate per linear foot of vessel length. As 
discussed earlier, the subject contains 105 wet slips with a total of 5,680 linear feet of rentable dock 
space, which indicates a total of 2,073,200 rentable linear feet per year. 
As of the effective valuation date, the subject marina has experienced an overall occupancy rate of 
56.3% for the year to date 2015. We have looked at occupancy rates on an average, annual basis due 
to the seasonal characteristics of this property type in this market. Again, due to the transient nature 
of the tenants in this property type and the short term nature of the leases which can range from daily 
to annually, the overall occupancy rate will be lower than other commercial property types such as 
lodging, multifamily, retail and office. The subject's current occupancy rate is slightly lower than 
historical rates, but the property is considered to be at stabilized occupancy. 
The weighted average contract rate is $37.29 per linear foot per month for the year to date 2015, 
which equates to an average contract rate of $447.50 per linear foot per year. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina Market Analysis 31 
Competitive Marinas 
The competitive marina rates are shown on the page that follows. It is our opinion that the subject's 
rates are at market levels; based on its age, location, and condition. 
Competitive Marinas - St. Thomas 
Marina 	# of Wet Slips 	Length 	Avg. Monthly Wet Slip Rental/IF 	Avg. Annual Wet Slip Rental/IF 
Sapphire Beach Resort and 	67 	50' 	$18.00 	$216.00 
Marina 
6720 Estate Smith Bay 
St. Thomas, VI 
Compass Point Marina 	38 	<30' 	$18.30 	$219.60 
41-6-1 & 41-7 Estate Frydenhoj 	59 	31-40 	$16.61 	$199.32 
St. Thomas, VI 	46 	41-50' 	$16.89 	$202.68 
10 	>50' 	$17.67 	$212.04 
Yacht Haven Grande 	46 	<80' 	$84.25 	$1,011.05 
Long Bay Rd, Charlotte Amalie 	80475' 	$129.12 	$1,549.43 
St. Thomas, VI 	>175"" 	$164.40 	$1,972.83 
Services/Amenities 
Crown Bay Marina 	99 	<55' 	$82.13 	$985.50 
8167 Sub Base 	56-75' 	$109.50 	$1,314.00 
St. Thomas, VI 	76-130' 	$126.23 	$1,514.75 
131-200' 	$142.96 	$1,715.50 
Oasis Cove Marina 	26 	<30' 	$26.67 	$320.00 
135 Estate Frydenhoj 	30'- 60' 	$24.44 	$293.33 
St. Thomas, VI 
American Yacht Harbor 	<49' 	$43.50 	$521.95 
98 
18A-1, 18-B1,18-B and 18-W 	50'- 79' 	$50.80 	$609.55 
Remainder Estate Smith Bay 	>80' 	$102.81 	$1,233.70 
7 
St. Thomas, VI 	T-Heads 	$102.81 	$1,233.70 
Marina is located in a beachfront resort 
property. Arnenties include 24/7 security, dock 
power/AC hookup, WI Fl, fret h water hookup, 
showers and hotel resort a menties. Some of 
these docks are privately owned, but rental 
rates are typi cal throughout. This is an 
u protected marina. 
This marina is also located in Benner Bay and 
includes a combination of apartments, retail 
and office space containing 25,552 square feet 
of rentable area. Amenities include, fresh water 
and electricity and finger peirs. 
This marina is located in Long Bay near 
Charlotte Amalie in St. Thomas. This is 
considered the premier luxury marina in the U.S. 
Virgin Islands and has the ability to berth 
megayachts up to 450 feet in length. There is 
80,000 sf of high-end retail space at the 
property. Marina amenities include electricity 
and fresh water, shower facilities, swimming 
pool and spa, business services, fueling, waste 
management services, 24/7 security, laundry 
service and provisioning options. The rental 
rate displayed is an average of summer and 
winter rates, and does not include utilities or 
service amenities. 
Full-service marina able to berth vessels up to 
200 feet in length and located less than 2.0 
miles from the Cyril E. King International 
Ai rport. This property also contains a 
significant amount of retail/commercial 
building space with various shops, restaurants 
and office space. Amenities include electricity, 
fresh water, fueling, full-service conciege desk, 
free wifi, satellite-1V, 24/7 security and 
showers. 
Located in Benner Bay, this marina was recently 
renovated within the past two years. Amenities 
include 24/7 security, fresh water hookups, 
electricity, WIFI, and good overall construction. 
The marina requires a one-year contract for wet 
slip rentals. 
Subject marina that is part of a full scale, mixed 
use property that contains various retail and 
office compontents. There are a total of 9 
restaurants on this property and many more 
shops and stores throughout. Marina amenities 
include electricity, fresh water, 24/7 security, 
WIFI and on-site fuel. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
i9 
Marina Market Analysis 32 
Competitive Marinas - British Virgin Islands 
Marina 	# of Wet Slips 	Length 	Avg. Monthly Wet Slip Renta I /LF 	Avg. Annual Wet Slip Rental/LF 
Soper's Hole Marina 	45 	<80' 	$38.02 	$456.25 
West End 	>80' 	$57.03 	$684.38 
Tortola, BVI 
Nany Cay 	180 	35-49' 	$43.95 	$527.43 
Tortola, BVI 	50-100' 	$51.86 	$622.33 
<100' 	$78.32 	$939.88 
T-Head 	$71.78 	$861.40 
Virgin Gorda Yacht Harbor 	120 	<55' 	$34.98 	$419.75 
St Thomas Bay 	56-79' 	$76.04 	$912.50 
Virgin Gorda, BVI 	<80' 	$83.65 	$1,003.75 
Services/Amenities 
Mixed-use marina property that contains 
shops, restaurants, offices and water-
sports rentals in addition to 20 protected 
moorings and 45 wet slips. Amenities 
include electricity, fresh water, fueling, 
showers, waste management, and free wifi 
in addition to haul-out and repair and 
maintenance services. 
This is a protected marina located on the 
southern coast of Tortola, between Road 
Town and West End. The property contains 
retail, office and hotel uses on site. 
Amenities include electricity, fresh water, 
showers, waste disposal and haul and 
repairs and maintenance services. This 
marina also includes dry slips which are 
not included in this analysis. 
This marina is located in Spanish Town on 
the island of Virgin Gorda. Both wet and 
dry slips are offered but the dry slip rates 
have not been considered in this analysis. 
There are some retail and office 
components at the property. Marina 
amenities include electricity, fresh water, 
showers, garbage disposal, laundry, 
provisioning and fueling. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina Market Analysis 
33 
Maps of Competitive Marinas 
St. Thomas 
1"". 
, 
king Aaport 
Freribrrlarl's 
renchmarl's Bea' \, 
1.kiirar9 :Aar 
8.••• 
Google 
iSt Thomas 
Thaicti 
* 
e coral Work! Ocean Park 
-,Cas 
Cay-Mangrn P 
Lagoon 
A Marin, 
Pa 
Sr 
Tharrers4 
Sr Marna, 
East End 
Reserves 
r)t.e Eltr,4.1.00.1s bay 
„eaihrk,r, 
st males 
Marine 
Pe-serve and • 
IN,hihre 
SUBJECT 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
irr. 
Marina Market Analysis 
34 
British Virgin Islands 
Jost Van Like 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
..- -....---Parhan,Town• — , \ 
, r "" 
. .ir .. , 
c- V/RoadJown 
I' . .  1-(...in'T,Jor..1,- ' 
Freshwater 1..._,..je 
Google 
Pete Island 
Virgin Gorda 
Marina Market Analysis 35 
Of the comparable marinas in St. Thomas, Yacht Haven Grande is the most superior in terms of 
location, quality and amenities. This marina is typically geared to extremely large vessels such as 
mega-yachts. Crown Bay Marina is slightly inferior to Yacht Haven Grande, but is still superior to the 
subject in quality and amenities. Sapphire Beach Resort, Compass Point and Oasis Cove are all 
considered to be inferior marinas to the subject based on location, quality and amenities offered. 
These marinas mostly cater to live-aboards and smaller vessels. 
The most comparable properties are located in the British Virgin Islands (BVI). Nany Cay and Virgin 
Gorda Yacht Harbor are slightly superior to Soper's Hole, but they are all similar in quality and 
amenities as the subject property. The location of the subject in St. Thomas, and its specific location 
within St. Thomas, is considered superior based on convenience. 
The majority of the subject's wet slips (98 out of 105) allow for vessels less than 80'. In this size range, 
the comparable marinas in St. Thomas range from $199.32 - $1,314 with an average of $578.38 per 
linear foot. The comparable marinas in the BVI range from $419.75 - $912.50 with an average of 
$587.65 per linear foot in this size range. The subject's asking rates for this size vessel averages 
approximately $565.75, which is slightly below average but reasonable. 
1 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
19 
Land Description and Analysis 36 
Property Analysis 
Land Description and Analysis 
Land Area Summary 
Parcel ID 	Address 	SF 	Acres 
1-07702-0135-00 	18A-1 Remainder Smith Bay 	9,583 	0.22 
1-07702-0134-00 	18B-1 Remainder Smith Bay 	20,909 	0.48 
1-07702-0133-00 	18B Remainder Smith Bay 	61,855 	1.42 
1-07702-0198-00 	18-W (filled land) 	27,878 	0.64 
Total 	120,226 	2.76 
Source: Land survey by Brian Moseley dated 12/10/2010 
Note that Parcel No 18-W was originally submerged seabed in Vessup Bay; however, this area was re-
claimed (filled) at an unknown date and subsequently improved upon. The subject property also 
includes a leasehold interest in 3.2 acres of submerged seabed under the dock structures that is 
owned by the Government of the Virgin Islands. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Land Description and Analysis 37 
Land Description 
Land Area 
Source of Land Area 
Primary Street Frontage 
Shape 
Corner 
Water Frontage 
Topography 
Drainage 
Environmental Hazards 
Ground Stability 
2.76 acres; 120,226 SF 
Land survey by Brian Moseley dated 12/10/2010 
Smith Bay Road -765 feet 
Irregular 
No 
Yes 
Genetly sloping east and towards the water 
No problems reported or observed 
None reported or observed 
No problems reported or observed 
Flood Area Panel Number 
Date 
Zone 
Description 
Insurance Required? 
7800000029G 
April 16, 2007 
AE 
Within 100-year floodpla in 
Yes 
Zoning; Other Regulations 
Zoning Jurisdiction 
Zoning Designation 
Description 
Legally Conforming? 
Zoning Change Likely? 
Permitted Uses 
Minimum Lot Area 
Minimum Street Frontage (Feet) 
Minimum Lot Width (Feet) 
Minimum Front Setback (Feet) 
Minimum Side Yard (Feet) 
Maximum Building Height 
Maximum Site Coverage 
Maximum Density 
Rent Control 
Other Land Use Regulations 
U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources 
W-1 
Waterfront- Pleasure 
Appears to be legally nonconforming 
No 
Variety of commercial uses, oriented towards water recreation and 
hospitality uses 
10,000 s.f. 
None 
100' 
25' 
10' 
3 stories 
0.4 
Maximum of 2 dwelling units per lot or 8.35 dwelling units per acre 
No 
None that we are aware 
Utilities 
Service 
Provider 
Water 
Sewer 
Electricity 
Natural Gas 
Local Phone 
Reverse Osmosis/WAPA available 
WAPA 
WAPA 
N/A 
Various providers 
It appears based the land survey provided that a portion of the building improvements does not meet 
the setback requirements by zoning and that the subject is a legal, nonconforming use. However, we 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Land Description and Analysis 38 
1 
1 
I 
are not experts in the interpretation of zoning ordinances. An appropriately qualified land use 
attorney should be engaged if a determination of compliance with zoning is required. 
The subject is located within a 100-year floodplain related to coastal flooding, which would require 
additional insurance at the expense of the owner. 
The subject site has 765 linear feet of frontage along Smith Bay Road. In addition, the subject has 846 
linear feet of water frontage along Vessup Bay. There is no beach along the waterfront portion; with 
the coastline being that of existing and former mangroves. It is assumed that dredging occurred at 
some point in time which enabled dockage in close proximity to the water line. 
Easements, Encroachments and Restrictions 
Based upon a review of the deed and property survey, there do not appear to be any easements, 
encroachments, or restrictions that would adversely affect value. According to the property survey 
provided, the subject parking garage encroaches the neighboring parcel to the north in two separate 
areas: an 82 square foot area encroaches onto Parcel 18N-1-A A, and a 105 square foot area 
encroaches onto Parcel 18B-2 A. These areas are small in size and the parcels being encroached upon 
are uneconomic remnants of land owned by the Government of the Virgin Islands. As a result, these 
encroachments do not have an adverse effect on the overall value of the subject. Our valuation 
assumes no adverse impacts from easements, encroachments, or restrictions, and further assumes 
that the subject has clear and marketable title. 
Conclusion of Land Analysis 
Overall, the physical characteristics of the site and the availability of utilities result in functional utility 
suitable for a variety of uses including those permitted by zoning. The subject's location along Smith 
Bay Road in the heart of Red Hook, along with its extensive water frontage on Vessup Bay, are major 
drivers of demand and value for marina and commercial use on the site. We are not aware of any 
other particular restrictions on development. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Land Description and Analysis 
39 
Cadastral Map 
Note that the area outlined in yellow above only includes the (upland) land area of the subject 
property and not seabed beneath the marina. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
19 
Land Description and Analysis 40 
Flood Map 
JOINS PANEL 
—ZONE VE 
(EL 9) 
COASTAL BARRIER 
IDENTIFIED 11/16/1990 
(SEE COASTAL BARRIER LEGEND) 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Land Description and Analysis 41 
Site Plan 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Improvements Description and Analysis 42 
Improvements Description and Analysis 
The subject is an existing 250-slip marina with 5 commercial buildings containing a mixture of retail 
and office space types. The buildings contain 48,661 square feet of rentable area and were 
constructed in multiple stages; with the majority of the construction completed in 1993. The 
commercial space is 85% leased as of the effective appraisal date. The marina docks were constructed 
in multiple phases between 1991-1995 and are 52.8% occupied as of the effective appraisal date. The 
total site area is 2.76 acres or 120,226 square feet, which includes 0.64 acre or 27,878 square feet, 
that is re-claimed land. The property also includes 3.2 acres of seabed under the marina dock 
structures which is leased to the property owner from the Government of the Virgin Islands. 
Improvements Description 
Name of Property IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
General Property Type Mixed Use 
Property Sub Type Marina 
Competitive Property Class B 
Occupancy Type Multi-Tenant 
Percent Leased 85% 
Number of Tenants 36 
Tenant Size Range (SF) 292 - 6,000 
Number of Buildings 5 
Stories 3 
Construction Class A 
Construction Type Steel frame 
Construction Quality Good 
Condition Good 
Units per Acre (Density) 38.0 
Gross Building Area (SF) 72,808 
Rentable Area (SF) 48,652 
Land Area (SF) 120,226 
Floor Area Ratio (RA/Land SF) 0.40 
Floor Area Ratio (GBA/Land SF) 0.61 
Building Area Source Rent roll and land survey by Brian Moseley dated 12/10/2010 
Year Built 1992 
Year Renovated N/A 
Actual Age (Yrs.) 23 
Esti mated Effective Age (Yrs.) 15 
Estimated Economic Life (Yrs.) 55 
Remaining Economic Life (Yrs.) 40 
Number of Parking Spaces 167 
Source of Parking Count Inspection 
Parking Type 89 surface; 78 covered, underground 
Parking Spaces/1,000 SF RA 3.43 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Improvements Description and Analysis 43 
Construction Details 
Foundation 
Structural Frame 
Corridor 
Exterior Walls 
Windows 
Roof 
Interior Finishes 
Floors 
Walls 
Ceilings 
Lighting 
Electrical 
Plumbing 
Heating 
Air Conditioning 
Utility Meters -Tenants 
Elevators 
Rest Rooms 
Sprinklers 
Other Fire Safety 
Security 
Reinforced concrete footings 
Steel frame 
Exterior breezeways 
Painted ma nsory on the lower levels, wood-siding on the upper levels 
Fixed commercial glass with wooden hurricane shutters 
Pitched with standing seam metal roof 
The subject property contains a total GBA of 72,808 and a rentable area of 
48,652. The large difference in area totals is due to a sigi nifi cant amount of 
exterior common areas as well as a 1,406 SF management office. The 
improvements are contained within five total buildings varying from one 
story to three stories. Each building contains a mixutre of retail and office 
space, with the retail spaces generally on the ground levels and the office 
spaces generally on the upper levels. The interior upfits of the spaces vary in 
use, quality and condition but generally are considered to be of good quality 
and condition. Based on the rent roll there are a total of 39 rentable spaces of 
which 10 are upfit as bar/restaurants (3 which share a kitchen), 17 are 
considered general retail spaces, 11 are considered general office spaces and 
one is considered a storage space. 
Combination of carpet, ceramic or porcelain tile, hardwood, and exposed 
brick. 
Combination of rendered and painted masonry and painted sheetrock. 
Combination of suspended grid accoustic panels, painted sheetrock, and 
tongue and groove or bead board. 
Combination of incandescent and fluorescent lighting with fixtures ranging 
from average to good quality. 
Assumed typical installation to code 
Assumed typical installation to code 
None 
Central 
Individually metered for water and electricity 
One 
Common area bathroom are adequate. There are four full bathrooms of good 
quality that are available to tenants of the marina. 
None 
Steel structural beams are fire coated with concrete 
The subject is gated along the waterfront and interior/exterior security 
cameras are installed throughout the property. 
Site Improvements 
Landscaping 
No. of Customer Parking Spaces 
Gates/Fencing 
Paving 
Average 
167 
Over 6' aluminum gate along the subject's waterfrontage 
Combination of concrete and brick pavers 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
El 
Improvements Description and Analysis 44 
Improvements Analysis — Building Improvements 
Quality and Condition 
The quality and condition of the subject is considered to be superior to that of competing properties. 
The interior and exterior building improvements are considered to be of good quality and in good 
condition based on our inspection. 
Functional Utility 
The improvements appear to be adequately suited to their current use, and there do not appear to be 
any significant items of functional obsolescence. 
Deferred Maintenance 
A few items of deferred maintenance were identified during our inspection and based on discussions 
with management. These include repairs and replacement to the parking garage ceiling, replacing the 
wooden deck on the upper level Building A, and re-facing various portions of the marina jettys. Note 
that a detailed description of the marina improvements will be discussed in the following section of 
this report. To estimate the cost to cure deferred maintenance, we rely on construction estimates 
from management as shown below. 
Deferred Maintenance 
Item 	Estimated Cost 
Parking garage ceiling 	$40,000 
Wooden deck repair/replacement 	$25,000 
Marina decking and fenderi ng repair/replace 	$96,000 
Total 	$161,000 
*Values expressed in United States Dollars 
Planned Capital Expenditures 
From 2013 to 2015, a total of $771,460.93 has been spent on various capital expenditures. The major 
improvements over the past three years were $84,088 for exterior column replacement, $62,172 for 
security cameras, $62,013 for marina bathrooms, and $281,950 for hand rail replacement. Upcoming 
expenditures for various capital items considered to be necessary are identified in the following table. 
To estimate the amounts of these expenditures, we rely on discussions with management. Estimated 
capital expenditures are as follows. 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Improvements Description and Analysis 45 
Capital Expenditures 
Item 	Year 1 
Transformer 	$10,000 
Exterior stairwell repairs 	$30,000 
Total 	$40,000 
Percent Applied 	100% 
Net Total 	$40,000 
*Values expressed in United States Dollars 
ADA Compliance 
Based on our inspection and information provided, we are not aware of any ADA issues. However, we 
are not expert in ADA matters, and further study by an appropriately qualified professional would be 
recommended to assess ADA compliance. 
Hazardous Substances 
An environmental assessment report was not provided for review and environmental issues are 
beyond our scope of expertise. No hazardous substances were observed during our inspection of the 
improvements; however, we are not qualified to detect such substances. There are three 10,000 
gallon diesel storage tanks and one 10,000 gallon gasoline storage tank located unground at the 
subject site. In addition, there is a marine fueling dock located on the marina. We have assumed there 
is no environment damage to the subject property as the result of these fuel stations and unless 
otherwise stated, we assume no hazardous conditions exist on or near the subject. 
Personal Property 
No personal property items were observed that would have any material contribution to market 
value. 
Conclusion of Improvements Analysis 
In comparison to other competitive properties in the region, the subject improvements are rated as 
follows: 
Improvements Ratings 
Visibility/Exposure Above Average 
Design and Appearance Above Average 
Age/Condition Above Average 
Adaptability of Space to other Retail Users Above Average 
Bathrooms Average 
Parking Ratios Below Average 
Di stance of Parking to Building Access Average 
Landscaping Average 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Improvements Description and Analysis 46 
Overall, the quality, condition, and functional utility of the improvements are above average for their 
age and location. The subject benefits from good access and visibility from both the waterfront and 
the main thoroughfare of Smith Bay Road. In addition, the overall quality and condition of the subject 
is above average for this market. Due to the small site size and large number of commercial tenants, 
there is insufficient parking at the subject based on market standards. 
Improvement Analysis — Marina 
The marina currently contains 105 wet slips, although that number can vary somewhat depending on 
the size (width) of the occupying vessels. Each designated slip is supplied with its own electrical outlet 
and fresh water supply, as well as access to a refueling line. The individual slip sizes can vary based on 
boater needs, but they can accommodate a variety of vessels, typically within the range from 30 to 79 
linear feet for the standard slips, and 79 to 110 linear feet for the T-head slips. In addition, some slips 
have an attached finger for easier access, which is considered more desirable. 
Generally the jetties and slips are constructed of PVC pilings bored and filled with concrete and steel; 
and wood plank surfacing. Many of the smaller slips are horizontally separated by wooden columns 
used to tie up vessels rather than there being jetties between each slip. 
The physical docks were constructed over several years, from 1991-1995, and are considered to be in 
average condition. Ongoing renovations have been made to the docks throughout the years, with 
upcoming expenditures included a complete resurfacing as well as re-facing the wooden skirts on 
most concrete pilings. The docks consist of mostly concrete pilings and cross braces with some wood, 
along with wooden skirts and wood decking surface. There have been no major renovations to slip 
structure within the past five years. 
The subject marina benefits greatly from its location in Vessup Bay, which is well protected and 
positioned in a convenient area at the heart of Red Hook. In addition, this bay has a direct route to St. 
John and the British Virgin Islands and has a depth that will accommodate vessels with a maximum 
draft of 10 feet and a maximum vessel length of 110 feet. The subject is one of the closest commercial 
marinas to both St. John and the BVI, and this convenient location is a major demand generator for 
commercial charters as well as vessels based in St. John and the BVI which are often in need of a 
fueling station. The quality and condition of the docks is considered to be average; however, the 
services and amenities offered at this marina are considered to be above average. 
1 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Improvements Description and Analysis 
47 
Front exterior of commercial building 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Side exterior of commercial building 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Rear exterior of commercial building from marina dock 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Front and side exterior of commercial building 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Rear and side exterior of commercial building 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Rear exterior of commercial building 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
iLl 
Improvements Description and Analysis 
48 
Interior of management office 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of restaurant space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of general retail space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Bathrooms for marina tenants 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of general retail space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of general retail space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Improvements Description and Analysis 
49 
Interior of restaurant space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of vacant office space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of restaurant space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of restaurant space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
111 
Interior of occupied office space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Interior of restaurant space 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
irr 
Improvements Description and Analysis 
50 
Typical marina dock 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Fuel dock 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Overview of marina dock 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
IGY American Yacht Harbor Marina 
Marina dock looking back to main commercial building 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
- 
Close-up of dock surface 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
Street view of Smith Bay Road looking northeast 
(Photo Taken on November 25, 2015) 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018962.txt,"Date: PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Time: Incident Report

Case No. .. . : 1-05-000368 (Continued)

Can Identify . : Victim Sobriety:

Injury Extent : Injury Type 1

Injury Type 2 : _ Hospital ID :

Med Treatment : Phys First Name:

Phys Last Name

KKKKKEEKE OT HER PERSON INFORMATION KR KEKE KK
Case Number . : 1-05-000368 t Name . . CoS

Street Number =: .

City .. : b6
Birth Date/Age : Employer? .. : b7C
Occupation ... : STUDE Oper Lic No.

Home Phone No. : Race... . . : White

Sex .... . : Female Height ....: 0

Weight ... 0 Person Type . : OTHER PERSON

Other Phone Nbr: .

RRKEKEKEK O THER PERSON INFORMATION - # 2 xxxxKkKEE
Case Number . : 1-05-000368 st Name :

Street Number

City . Z

Birth Date/Age : Employer? .. :

Decupation .. : Oper Lic No. . ‘[
dome Phone No. : Race... .. : White b6
sex . . . . . : Female Height... . : 510 b7c
Veight ....: 0 Person Type . : OTHER PERSON

ther Phone Nbr:

tkkeREKEXK O T HER PERSON INFORMATION 3B KKEKKKKKE
tase Number . : 1-05-000368 Name ..: coo SS YS
street Number =: ‘

tity . .

3irth Date/Age Employer? ..

\ecupation Oper Lic No. . :

fome Phone No. Race... . . : White

‘eX . . ke, Female Height ....: 0

leight . 0 Person Type . : OTHER PERSON

‘ther Phone Nor: [

‘kkEKKERE OT HER PERSON INFORMATION KKKAKEE RK
‘ase Number . : 1-05-000368 Name .. :
itreet Number :

‘ity .

sixth Date/Age Employer?

iccupation Oper Lic No. :

‘ome Phone No. Race... . . : White

ex se wa 8 Height ....: 0

eight i. ; 0 Person Type . : OTHER PERSON

ther Phone “Nbr:

KeKKKKEKK QO THER PERSON INFORMATI = 5 BRERKKKKE
ase Number . : 1-05-000368 Last Name . . pees

ae —— : HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018962
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014386.txt,"estimates imply RF would generate ROTEs of 10-11% in 2016-2017E, hence we find RF
fairly valued at 1.3x TBV. Our 13x multiple is in-line with large regional peers. Our DCF
assumes a two-stage cost of capital of 13.6% and 10.5% and a terminal growth rate of
6.5% and Tier 1 common of 8% at termination.

Downside risks to our PO are a slower-than-expected credit recovery, and the Fed on
hold for a longer period of time.

Signature Bank (SBNY)

We use an equal-weighted three-factor valuation framework (P/E, P/TBV, DCF) to arrive
at our $160 PO and assign a 2.1x multiple to 3Q17E TBV, representing a premium to the
group, which we believe is appropriate given a stronger profitability and capital profile,
and above-peer-growth prospects. Our 16.1x multiple on 2017E is higher than peers
given consistent above peer growth. Our DCF assumes a two-stage cost of capital of
10% and a terminal growth rate of 4%.

Risks to our price objective are required provisioning at higher-than-forecast levels,
further deterioration in rental income for commercial properties, and a longer-than-
anticipated low-rate environment.

SunTrust Banks, Inc. (STI)

We use a three-factor valuation framework (P/E, P/TBV, DCF} to arrive at our $53 PO,
assigning a 1.7x multiple to 2017E TBV and 14.5x multiple on 17E EPS. Above peer
P/TBV due to their above median profitability, and below peer P/E due to their below
median EPS growth. We have weighted the P/E and P/TBV factors equally at 40%, and
our DCF analysis by 20%.

Our DCF assumes a two-stage cost of capital of 12% and a terminal growth rate of 4%.

Risks to our price objective are macro risks, such as a slower than expected rate
increase. Upside risks are higher-than-expected capital return, a general beta rally for
bank stocks, and faster recognition of “normalized” earnings.

SVB Financial Group (SIVB)

We use a three-factor valuation framework (P/TBV, P/E, DCF) to arrive at our $165 price
objective and assign a 1.8x multiple to our 2Q17E TBV and apply a 17x P/E to 17E EPS.
Our valuation multiples are both in line with high growth peers due to SIVB's high
profitability and EPS growth profile. Our DCF assumes a two-stage cost of capital of
9.5% and a terminal growth rate of 6%.

Downside risks are a longer than expected low rate environment and a slowdown in the
technology sector and related IPO activity. Upside risks are sooner than expected rate
hike, or better than expected pickup in the tech sector.

Synovus Financial Corp. (SNV)

We use a three-factor valuation framework (P/E, P/TBV, DCF) to arrive at our $40 price
objective and assign a 1.7x multiple to our forward 2Q17 TBV, given peers are currently
trading higher and a discount is warranted given their lower return profile. We place a
15x multiple on 2017E EPS, in line with the historical median for the stock. Our DCF
assumes a two-stage cost of capital of 9%, and a terminal growth rate of 3%.

Downside risks to our price objective are potentially slower-than-expected economic
growth in their footprint or a potential takeout price that is lower than where the stock
is trading today. Upside risks to our price objective are a quicker pick-up in capital return
than we are expecting and SNV being acquired above our price objective.

TCF Financial Corp. (TCB)

BankofAmerica <2”

72 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014386
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017060.txt,"﻿World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
List of Participants (For planning purposes only and not for publication)
As of 18 January 2011
Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, 26-30 January
Michael J. Abbott Chief Investment Officer Cornell University USA
Zein Abdalla Chief Executive Officer PepsiCo Europe Switzerland
Mustafa Abdel-Wadood Managing Director and Chief
Abraaj Capital Limited United Arab Emirates
Executive Officer, Abraaj Investment
Management
Abdul Rahman Mohd Chairman
Peremba Group of
Malaysia
Razali
Companies
Khalid Abdulla-Janahi Honorary Chairman Vision 3 United Arab Emirates
Hafsat Abiola-Costello Founder and Chief Executive Officer China-Africa Bridge Nigeria
Magid Abraham
President, Chief Executive Officer comScore Inc.
USA
and Co-Founder
Reuben Abraham
Executive Director, Centre for Indian School of Business India
Emerging Markets Solutions
Phillip Abrary President and Chief Executive Officer Ostara Nutrient Recovery Canada
Technologies Inc.
Issa Abdul Salam Abu Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Salam International
Qatar
Issa
Investment Ltd
Mikhail A. Abyzov Chairman RU-COM Russian Federation
Aclan Acar Chairman Dogus Otomotiv AS Turkey
Paul Achleitner Member of the Board of Management Allianz SE Germany
Josef Ackermann
Chairman of the Management Board Deutsche Bank AG
Germany
and the Group Executive Committee
Mohamed Adam
Corporate Counsel and Senior Eskom Holdings Limited South Africa
General Manager, Regulation and
Governance
Carol Adelman President Movers & Shakespeares USA
Ken Adelman Vice-President Movers & Shakespeares USA
Trip Adler
Co-Founder and Chief Executive Scribd Inc.
USA
Officer
Patrick Aebischer President Ecole Polytechnique
Switzerland
Fédérale de Lausanne
(EPFL)
Daniel S. Aegerter Chairman Armada Investment Group Switzerland
AG
Olusegun Aganga
Minister of Finance of Nigeria
Shai Agassi Founder and Chief Executive Officer Better Place Israel
Marcus Agius Group Chairman Barclays PLC United Kingdom
BP Agrawal Executive Director Sustainable Innovations Inc. USA
Antonio De Aguiar Patriota Minister of External Relations of
Brazil
David Agus
Professor of Medicine and Director, University of Southern USA
USC Center for Applied Molecular
Medicine
California (USC)
Karen Agustiawan President and Chief Executive Officer PT Pertamina (Persero) Indonesia
Pierre Ahlborn Chief Executive Officer Banque de Luxembourg SA Luxembourg
Montek Singh Ahluwalia Deputy Chairman, Planning
Commission, India
Ahmad Radhi Nungsari Executive Director Khazanah Nasional Berhad Malaysia
Kamal Ahmed Business Editor The Sunday Telegraph United Kingdom
Masood Ahmed
Director, Middle East and Central International Monetary Fund USA
Asia Department
(IMF)
Shawn Ahmed Founder The Uncultured Project Canada
Sanjiv Ahuja Chairman and Chief Executive Officer LightSquared USA
Markus Akermann Chief Executive Officer Holcim Ltd Switzerland
Hüsnü Akhan Chief Executive Officer Dogus Group Turkey
Jamal Akl
Group Vice-President, Sales,
Proposals and Support
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Consolidated Contractors
Company (CCC)
Greece
Samir Al Rifai
Prime Minister of the Hashemite
Kingdom of Jordan
H.R.H. Prince Turki Al Prince of Saudi Royal Family
Faisal Al Saud
Matti Alahuhta President and Chief Executive Officer Kone Corporation Finland
Anass Alami Director-General Caisse de Dépôt et de Morocco
Gestion (CDG)
José Maria Alapont President and Chief Executive Officer Federal-Mogul Corporation USA
Pierre Alary
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Bombardier Inc.
Canada
Vice-President
Tom Albanese Chief Executive Rio Tinto Plc United Kingdom
Jim Albaugh President and Chief Executive Officer Boeing Commercial
USA
Airplanes
Liz Alderman Chief Business Correspondent International Herald Tribune France
Philip Aldrick Economics Editor The Daily Telegraph United Kingdom
Felipe Aldunate Editor-in-Chief AméricaEconomía Chile
Hans van Alebeek
Corporate Vice-President, Global Nike Inc.
USA
Operations and Technology
Vagit Yu Alekperov President and Chief Executive Officer OAO LUKOIL Russian Federation
Nerio Alessandri Founder and Chairman Technogym SPA Italy
Helen Alexander President Confederation of British United Kingdom
Industry (CBI)
Mohammed F. M. Th. Vice-Chairman
Fouad Alghanim & Sons Kuwait
Alghanim
Group of Companies
Omar K. Alghanim Chief Executive Officer Alghanim Industries Kuwait
Marwan Al Ali
Senior Vice-President Operations, Jumeirah Group
United Arab Emirates
Middle East, Africa, India and South
Asia
Yusuff Ali Managing Director Emke Group L.L.C. United Arab Emirates
Kurt Alig Chairman Arcadia Treuhand AG Switzerland
Khalid A. Alireza Executive Director Xenel Group Saudi Arabia
Ilham Aliyev
President of Azerbaijan
Hamza B. Alkholi Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Hamza Alkholi Group Saudi Arabia
Yvan Allaire Chair of the Board of Directors Institute for Governance of Canada
Public and Private
Organizations (IGOPP)
Graham Allan Chief Executive Officer Yum! Restaurants
USA
International
Natalia Allen Founder and Chief Executive Officer Design Futurist SM USA
Sharon Allen Chairman Deloitte USA
Joaquín Almunia
Vice-President and Commissioner,
Competition, European Commission,
Brussels
Howard Alper Chair and President Science, Technology and Canada
Innovation Council
Edmond Alphandéry Chairman CNP Assurances SA France
Mohammed Alshaya Executive Chairman Alshaya Group Kuwait
José María Álvarez Pallete Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Telefónica Latinoamérica Spain
Aly Aziz Chairman The Dashwood Group United Kingdom
Yahya Alyahya Chief Executive Officer Gulf International Bank BSC Bahrain
(GIB)
Yukiya Amano
Director-General, International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna
Luis Conceicao do Amaral President Eurocash SA Poland
Mukesh D. Ambani Chairman and Managing Director Reliance Industries Ltd India
Mohammed Ahmed Al President
Central Informatics
Bahrain
Amer
Organization
Maurice A. Amon Executive Co-Chairman SICPA Holding SA Switzerland
Philippe Amon Executive Co-Chairman SICPA Holding SA Switzerland
Baroness Amos
Undersecretary-General for
Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency
Relief Coordinator, UN Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
(OCHA), New York
Piyasvasti Amranand President Thai Airways International Thailand
M. S. Ananth Director Indian Institute of
India
Technology Madras
Nils Smedegaard
Group Chief Executive Officer A.P. Møller-Maersk AS Denmark
Andersen
Carl A. Anderson
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board, Knights of Columbus,
USA
Richard H. Anderson Chief Executive Officer Delta Air Lines Inc. USA
László Andor
Commissioner, Employment, Social
Affairs and Inclusion, European
Commission, Brussels
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Johan H. Andresen Jr Owner and Chief Executive Officer Ferd Norway
Jason Andrew
Vice-President, Worldwide Marketing BMC Software Inc.
USA
and Channels
Kirill Androsov
Managing Partner, Altera Capital,
Russian Federation
Christian Angermayer Chief Executive Officer Angermayer, Brumm & Germany
Lange Merchant Banking
Group
Husodo Angkosubroto Chairman PT Gunung Sewu Kencana Indonesia
Kofi Annan
Secretary-General, United Nations
(1997-2006); Member of the
Foundation Board of the World
Economic Forum
Alan Annex
Chair, New York Corporate and Greenberg Traurig LLP USA
Securites Group
Paola Antonelli
Senior Curator, Department of Museum of Modern Art USA
Architecture and Design
Platon Antoniou
Photographer, USA
Leo Apotheker President and Chief Executive Officer Hewlett-Packard Company USA
Frank Appel Chief Executive Officer Deutsche Post DHL Germany
David Appia
Ambassador of France for
International Investment; Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, Invest in
France Agency, France
Jun Arai President Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K. Japan
Marta Arango Nimnicht Founder and General Director International Center for Colombia
Education and Human
Development (CINDE)
Louise Arbour President and Chief Executive Officer International Crisis Group Belgium
(ICG)
Dan Ariely
Professor of Psychology and
Duke University
USA
Behavioral Economics
Anita Arjundas Managing Director Mahindra Lifespace
India
Developers Limited
David Arkless
President, Corporate and
Manpower Inc.
United Kingdom
Government Affairs
Peter Armstrong Director OneWorld UK United Kingdom
Tim Armstrong Chairman and Chief Executive Officer AOL USA
Nikesh Arora
Senior Vice-President and Chief Google Inc.
USA
Business Officer
W. Brian Arthur Professor Santa Fe Institute USA
Ayman Asfari Group Chief Executive Petrofac Ltd United Kingdom
Tewodros Ashenafi Chairman and Chief Executive Officer SouthWest Energy (HK) Ltd Ethiopia
Samir Assaf
Chief Executive, Global Banking and HSBC Bank Plc
United Kingdom
Markets
Peter Athanas Member of the Board of Directors Schindler Holding Ltd Switzerland
Abdul Rahman Attar President Attar Group Syria
Khalid bin Mohammed Al
Attiyah
Minister of State for International
Cooperation of Qatar
Lera Auerbach
Composer, Poet and Concert Pianist
Helmut Aurenz Member of the Supervisory Board AUDI AG Germany
Bruce E. Aust Jr
Executive Vice-President, Global The NASDAQ OMX Group USA
Corporate Client Group
Stefano Aversa President and Member of the Board AlixPartners LLP USA
Ronit Avni Founder and Executive Director Just Vision USA
Eytan Avriel Managing Editor Ha'aretz Daily Newspaper Israel
Bassem I. Awadallah Chief Executive Officer Tomoh Advisory Jordan
Orlando Ayala
Corporate Vice-President, Chairman Microsoft Corporation USA
of Emerging Markets and Chief
Adviser to the Chief Operating Officer
José Sergio Gabrielli de President and Chief Executive Officer Petroleo Brasileiro SA Brazil
Azevedo
Petrobras
Azman Mokhtar Managing Director Khazanah Nasional Berhad Malaysia
Michelle Bachelet
Undersecretary-General, United
Nations Women (UN Women), New
York
Louis Bacon Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Moore Capital Management, USA
Abdalla Salem El Badri Secretary-General, Organization of
the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC), Vienna
Raymond J. Baer Chairman of the Board Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd Switzerland
Sebastián Bagó President Laboratorios Bagó SA Argentina
Shaikha Al Bahar Chief Executive Officer National Bank of Kuwait Kuwait
Alejandro Baillères Chief Executive Officer Grupo Nacional Provincial
SAB
Mexico
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
LP
Madhur Bajaj Vice-Chairman Bajaj Auto Ltd India
Niraj Bajaj Chairman and Managing Director Mukand Limited India
Rahul Bajaj Chairman Bajaj Auto Ltd India
Douglas M. Baker Jr Chairman, President and Chief Ecolab Inc.
USA
Executive Officer
Gerard Baker Deputy Editor-in-Chief The Wall Street Journal USA
Peter Bakker Chief Executive Officer TNT Netherlands
Jon Fredrik Baksaas President and Chief Executive Officer Telenor ASA Norway
Jorge E. Ballesteros Chief Executive Officer
Grupo Mexicano de
Mexico
Zavala
Desarrollo SAB
Jim Balsillie
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Research in Motion Limited Canada
Officer
Rolando Balsinde Director McKinsey & Company Spain
Beat Balzli Editor-in-Chief HandelsZeitung und
Switzerland
Finanzrundschau AG
Ban Ki-moon
Secretary-General, United Nations,
New York
Stéphane Bancel Chief Executive Officer bioMérieux SA USA
Oriana Bandiera Professor of Economics London School of
United Kingdom
Economics and Political
Science
Chandrajit Banerjee Director-General Confederation of Indian India
Industry (CII)
Shumeet Banerji Chief Executive Officer Booz & Company United Kingdom
Manvinder S. Banga Operating Partner Clayton, Dubilier & Rice LLP United Kingdom
Britt D. Banks Adjunct Professor, School of Law University of Colorado USA
Almir Guilherme Barbassa Chief Financial Officer Petroleo Brasileiro SA Brazil
Petrobras
Lionel Barber Editor The Financial Times United Kingdom
Roger Barnett Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Shaklee Corporation USA
Nicholas Barr Professor of Public Economics London School of
United Kingdom
Economics and Political
Science
Nicolas Barré Deputy Managing Editor Les Echos France
Maria Bartiromo
Anchor, CNBC's Closing Bell; Host CNBC
USA
and Managing Editor, Wall Street
Journal Report
Dominic Barton Worldwide Managing Director McKinsey & Company United Kingdom
Pius Baschera Chairman of the Board of Directors Hilti Aktiengesellschaft Liechtenstein
Lluis Bassets Op-Ed Editor El País Spain
Sonja Bata Chairman Bata Shoe Foundation Canada
Olivier Baube Editor-in-Chief, Economy Agence France Presse France
(AFP)
Raymond J. Baxter Senior Vice-President, Community Kaiser Foundation Health USA
Benefit, Research and Health Policy Plan Inc.
Eben Bayer Founder and Chief Executive Officer Ecovative Design LLC USA
Alexander Bazarov Vice-President Sberbank Russian Federation
Abdullah Bazid
Executive Vice-President, Strategy Saudi Basic Industries Saudi Arabia
Planning
Corporation (SABIC)
Timothy Beardson Chairman Crosby Holdings Ltd Hong Kong SAR
Robert E. Beauchamp Chairman, President and Chief BMC Software Inc.
USA
Executive Officer
Laurent Beaudoin Chairman of the Board Bombardier Inc. Canada
Pierre Beaudoin President and Chief Executive Officer Bombardier Inc. Canada
Bernhard Beck Chief Personnel Officer EnBW Energie Baden- Germany
Württemberg AG
Christophe Beck Executive Vice-President, Institutional Ecolab Inc. USA
John M. Beck Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Aecon Group Inc. Canada
Carol Becker Dean, School of the Arts Columbia University USA
Charlie Beckett Director, POLIS London School of
United Kingdom
Economics and Political
Science
Tanya Beckett Presenter BBC World News United Kingdom
Bernd Beetz Chief Executive Officer Coty Inc. USA
Brian Behlendorf
Chief Technology Officer, World
Economic Forum
Nariman Behravesh Chief Economist IHS USA
Martha Bejar
President, Global Sales and
Wipro Technologies
USA
Operations
Koos Bekker Chief Executive Officer Naspers Ltd South Africa
Erik Belfrage Senior Advisor to the Chairman Investor AB Sweden
Marc R. Benioff Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Salesforce.com USA
Suzan G. Benmayor Columnist Hürriyet Gazetesi Turkey
Katrin Bennhold Paris Correspondent International Herald Tribune France
Stéphane Benoit-Godet Editor-in-Chief Bilan Switzerland
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Bruno Bensasson
Vice-President, Economics, Prices GDF SUEZ
France
and Markets
Robert Berendes Head of Business Development Syngenta International AG Switzerland
Axel Berg
Ambassador of Germany to
Switzerland
Roland Berger Honorary Chairman Roland Berger Strategy Germany
Consultants Holding GmbH
Douglas G. Bergeron Chairman and Chief Executive Officer VeriFone Systems Inc. USA
Nicolas Berggruen President and Chairman Nicolas Berggruen Institute USA
Stanley M. Bergman Chairman of the Board and Chief Henry Schein Inc.
USA
Executive Officer
C. Fred Bergsten Director The Peterson Institute for USA
International Economics
Alfred R. Berkeley Chairman Pipeline Financial Group Inc. USA
William H. Berkman Managing Partner Liberty Associated Partners USA
LP
Thomas L. Bernardin Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Leo Burnett Worldwide USA
Thomas Bernt Henriksen Economics Editor Dagbladet Børsen A/S Denmark
Giuliano Berretta Chairman of the Board Eutelsat SA France
Mike Berry President Hillwood Development USA
Corporation
Ernesto Bertarelli Chairman Kedge Capital Partners Switzerland
Limited
Mark T. Bertolini Chief Executive Officer and President Aetna Inc. USA
Baron Luc Bertrand Chairman of the Executive Committee Ackermans & Van Haaren Belgium
and Chief Executive Officer
NV
Akil Beshir Chairman Telecom Egypt Egypt
Erik Bettermann Director-General Deutsche Welle TV Germany
Ulrich L. Bettermann President and Chairman of the Board OBO Bettermann Group Germany
Jeffrey L. Bewkes Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Time Warner Inc. USA
Donald S. Beyer Jr US Ambassador US Embassy Switzerland
Homi K. Bhabha
Anne F. Rothenberg Professor of the Harvard University
USA
Humanities, Department of English
and American Literature
Neeraj Bharadwaj Managing Director Accel India Growth
India
Management Company Pvt.
Ltd
Hari S. Bhartia
Co-Chairman and Managing Director; Jubilant Bhartia Group India
President, Confederation of Indian
Industry (CII)
Shobhana Bhartia
Member of Parliament; Chairperson HT Media Limited
India
and Editorial Director
Shyam Sunder Bhartia Chairman and Managing Director Jubilant Bhartia Group India
Pramod Bhasin President and Chief Executive Officer Genpact Ltd India
Karan Bhatia
Vice-President and Senior Counsel, General Electric Company USA
International Law and Policy
Om Prakash Bhatt Chairman State Bank of India India
Carl Bildt
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sweden
Jeroo Billimoria Executive Director Aflatoun, Child Social and Netherlands
Financial Education
Nicholas E. Billotti President and Chief Executive Officer Turner International LLC USA
Nabeel Bin Salamah Chief Executive Officer Zain Kuwait
Sally Grover Bingham Reverend Interfaith Power & Light USA
Kumar M. Birla Group Chairman The Aditya Birla Group India
Leonhard Birnbaum Chief Strategy Officer and Member of RWE AG
Germany
the Executive Board
Fatih Birol Chief Economist International Energy Agency France
Silas Birtwistle
Artist, A Table from the Sea's Edge
Project, United Kingdom
Matthew Bishop New York Bureau Chief The Economist USA
Rune Bjerke President and Chief Executive Officer DnB NOR ASA Norway
Kurt Bjorklund Co-Managing Partner Permira Advisers LLP United Kingdom
Jerry Black
Vice-President, Chief Executive Aeon Co. Ltd
Japan
Officer ASEAN Business
Brent Blair
Associate Professor of Theatre University of Southern USA
Practice, School of Theatre
California (USC)
Tony Blair
UN Middle East Quartet
Representative
Franck Blais Vice-President Lynx Energy Partners Switzerland
Mario I. Blejer
Adjunct Professor of Finance, School Universidad Torcuato di Argentina
of Business
Tella
Martin Blessing
Chairman of the Board of Managing Commerzbank AG
Germany
Directors
Richard Blewitt Chief Executive HelpAge International United Kingdom
Henry Blodget
Chief Executive Officer and Editor-in-
Chief
Business Insider, Inc. USA
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
David E. Bloom
Clarence James Gamble Professor of Harvard School of Public USA
Economics and Demography
Health
Kathy Bloomgarden Chief Executive Officer Ruder Finn Inc. USA
Sally Blount Dean Kellogg School of
USA
Management
Rebecca Blumenstein Deputy Managing Editor The Wall Street Journal USA
Adam Bly Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seed USA
Kurt Bock
Member of the Board, Chief Financial BASF SE
Germany
Officer and Chairman-Elect, Board of
Executive Directors
Michael C. Bodson Executive Managing Director The Depository Trust & USA
Clearing Corporation
(DTCC)
Alan Boeckmann Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Fluor Corporation USA
Deborah Boedicker Principal Strategic Investment Group USA
Yurii Boiko
Minister of Energy and Coal Industry
of Ukraine
Irina Gueorguieva Bokova Director-General, United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO), Paris
Marc Bolland Chief Executive Marks & Spencer Plc United Kingdom
Roberto Bolle Etoile La Scala Theatre Italy
Lee C. Bollinger President Columbia University USA
Nikolaus von Bomhard Chairman of the Board of
Munich Re
Germany
Management
Bono
Lead singer of U2 and Co-Founder, ONE
United Kingdom
ONE campaign and (RED)
Marwan M. Boodai Chief Executive Officer Boodai Corporation Kuwait
Claire Boonstra Co-Founder Layar Netherlands
Anders Borg
Minister of Finance of Sweden
Andrei F. Borodin Chief Executive Officer Bank of Moscow Russian Federation
Clemens Börsig Chairman of the Supervisory Board Deutsche Bank AG Germany
Sir Leszek Borysiewicz Vice-Chancellor University of Cambridge United Kingdom
Micheline Bossaert Director of International Department GDF SUEZ France
Ana P. Botín Member of the Board Banco Santander SA Spain
John C. Botts Chairman United Business Media Plc United Kingdom
Martha Boudreau President and Senior Partner Fleishman-Hillard USA
Charles-Edouard Bouée
Youssef Boutros-Ghali
Member of the Global Executive
Committee and President of Roland
Berger Asia
Minister of Finance of Egypt; Chair of
the International Monetary and
Financial Committee, International
Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
DC
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Roland Berger Strategy
Consultants
People's Republic of
China
Roberta B. Bowman Senior Vice-President and Chief Duke Energy Corporation USA
Sustainability Officer
Jean-François van Chairman of the Executive Board and Heineken International Netherlands
Boxmeer
Chief Executive Officer
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe Chairman of the Board Nestlé SA Switzerland
Anu Bradford Member of the Board SITRA (Finnish National
Fund for Research and
Development)
USA
Svein Richard Brandtzaeg President and Chief Executive Officer Hydro Norway
Susan Brate Executive Manager, Manufacturing SABIC Innovative Plastics USA
LLC
Marcus W. Brauchli Executive Editor The Washington Post USA
Company
Sigve Brekke
Executive Vice-President, Telenor Telenor Asia (ROH) Ltd Thailand
Group and Head of Asia Region
Ian Bremmer President Eurasia Group USA
Børge Brende Secretary-General Norwegian Red Cross Norway
Marcus Brennecke Senior Partner EQT Partners
Germany
Beteiligungsberatung GmbH
Erik A. Brenninkmeijer Chairman of the Supervisory Board COFRA Holding AG Switzerland
Maurice Brenninkmeijer Director C&A Netherlands
Jim Breyer Partner Accel Partners USA
Samir Brikho Chief Executive Officer AMEC Plc United Kingdom
Sergey Brilev Anchor and Deputy Director Russia TV Russian Federation
Sergey Brin
Co-Founder and President,
Google Inc.
USA
Technology
William A. Brindley Chief Executive Offcer Nethope Inc. USA
Scott Brison
Member of Parliament and Member of
the Liberal Official Opposition
Shadow Cabinet, House of
Commons, Canada

Hannes Britschgi Publisher Ringier AG Switzerland
Romero Britto Artist and President Britto Central USA
Jeffrey D. Brody Founding Partner Redpoint Ventures USA
Beth A. Brooke
Global Vice-Chair, Public Policy, Ernst & Young
USA
Sustainability and Stakeholder
Engagement
David Brooks Op-Ed Columnist The New York Times USA
Rebekah Brooks Chief Executive Officer News International Plc United Kingdom
Stuart Brooks Special Adviser Chevron Corporation United Kingdom
Richard D. Broome Senior Vice-President, Corporate Hertz Global Holding Inc. USA
Affairs and Communications
Frank Brosens Co-Founder Taconic Capital Advisors LP USA
William F. Browder Chief Executive Officer Hermitage Capital
United Kingdom
Management Ltd
J. Frank Brown Dean INSEAD France
Mike Brown Chief Executive Officer Nedbank Group South Africa
Tim Brown Chief Executive Officer IDEO LLC USA
Tina Brown Founder and Editor-in-Chief The Daily Beast USA
Neil Alexander Bruce Chief Operating Officer Amec Plc - Natural
United Kingdom
Resources
Rainer Brüderle
Federal Minister of Economics and
Technology of Germany
Peter C. Brun Senior Vice-President Vestas Wind Systems A/S Denmark
Fred M. Brune
President, Group Chief Executive, CH2M HILL
USA
International
Bernd Brunke
Member of the Global Executive Roland Berger Strategy Germany
Committee
Consultants
Frank Bruno President Cerberus Global Investment USA
Advisors LLC
John G. Bruno Executive Vice-President NCR Corporation USA
Daniel J. Brutto President, UPS International UPS Belgium
Eddy Bruyninckx Chief Executive Officer Port Authority Antwerp Belgium
Charles Brymer President and Chief Executive Officer DDB Worldwide USA
Thomas Buberl
Chief Executive Officer, Zurich Zurich Financial Services Switzerland
Switzerland
Rolf Buch Chief Executive Officer arvato AG Germany
Mick Buckley
President and Chief Executive Officer CNBC
United Kingdom
EMEA
Jerry Buhlmann Chief Executive Officer Aegis Group Plc United Kingdom
Paul Bulcke Chief Executive Officer Nestlé SA Switzerland
Marcos Bulgheroni Executive Vice-Chairman Energy Developments and Italy
Investments Corporation
(EDIC)
Prasert Bunsumpun President and Chief Executive Officer PTT Public Company Ltd Thailand
Hubert Burda Chairman Burda Media Germany
Richard Burdett Director, LSE Cities and Urban Age London School of
United Kingdom
Economics Cities
Programme
Ted Burke Managing Partner Freshfields Bruckhaus United Kingdom
Deringer
Hans-Paul Bürkner Global Chief Executive Officer and The Boston Consulting Germany
President
Group
M. Michele Burns Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mercer Inc. (M&MC) USA
Sharan Burrow General Secretary International Trade Union Belgium
Confederation (ITUC)
Michael Buscher Chief Executive Officer OC Oerlikon Management Switzerland
AG
Caspar Busse Business Editor Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH Germany
Jean-Luc Butel
Executive Vice-President and Group Medtronic Inc.
Japan
President, International
Luigi Buttiglione Partner, Head of Global Strategy Brevan Howard Investment Switzerland
Products Ltd
Baron Paul Buysse Chairman of the Board of Directors Bekaert NV/SA Belgium
Felipe Calderón
President of Mexico
Micheline Calmy-Rey President of the Swiss Confederation
and Federal Councillor of Foreign
Affairs of the Swiss Confederation
Jorge Calvet Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Gamesa Corporación Spain
Tecnológica SA
David Cameron
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
James Cameron Founder and Vice-Chairman Climate Change Capital United Kingdom
Philip Campbell Editor-in-Chief Nature United Kingdom
Rachel Campbell
Global Head, People, Performance KPMG
United Kingdom
and Culture
Lázaro Campos Chief Executive Officer SWIFT SCRL Belgium
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Eric I. Cantor
Majority Leader and Congressman
from Virginia (Republican), 7th
District, USA
Cao Duc Phat
Minister of Agriculture and Rural
Development of Vietnam
Susan Capps Morris Senior Vice-President and Chief of Merck & Co. Inc.
USA
Staff to Office of Chief Executive
Officer
Steve Cardell Chief Executive Officer HCL Axon United Kingdom
Gunilla Carlsson
Minister of International Development
Cooperation of Sweden
Mark J. Carney
Governor of the Bank of Canada
Roger M. Carr Chairman Centrica Plc United Kingdom
José Carreras Opera Singer José Carreras International Spain
Leukaemia Foundation
Cynthia Carroll Chief Executive Anglo American Plc United Kingdom
Stephen A. Carter
Chief Marketing, Strategy and Alcatel-Lucent
France
Communication Officer and Executive
Vice-President
Jaime Caruana
General Manager, Bank for
International Settlements (BIS), Basel
John Casey
Vice-President International News CNBC
United Kingdom
and Programming
Pete Cashmore Chief Executive Officer and Founder Mashable USA
Alessandro Castellano Chief Executive Officer Sace SpA Italy
Giovanni Castellucci Chief Executive Officer Atlantia SpA Italy
Juan Luis Cebrian Echarri Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Grupo Prisa
Spain
of the Executive Committee
Dominique Cerutti
President and Deputy Chief Executive NYSE Euronext
France
Officer
Laura Cha
Deputy Chairman, The Hong Kong HSBC Asia Pacific
Hong Kong SAR
and Shanghai Banking Corporation
(Asia Pacific)
Sanjeev Chadha
President, Middle East and Africa PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. India
Region
Ltd
John T. Chambers Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Cisco USA
Walid Chammah Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Morgan Stanley International United Kingdom
Limited
François-Philippe
Strategic Development Director; AMEC Plc
United Kingdom
Champagne
Member of Management Committee
Margaret Chan
Director-General, World Health
Organization (WHO), Geneva
Sanjay Chandra Managing Director Unitech Limited India
Vikram Chandra Presenter and Editor New Delhi Television India
(NDTV)
Natarajan
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Tata Consultancy Services India
Chandrasekaran
Director
Ltd
Anjali Chandrashekar Global Changemaker British Council India
Rajesh Chandy Professor of Marketing London Business School United Kingdom
Chang Dae-Whan Chairman and Publisher Maeil Business Newspaper Republic of Korea
and TV
Jean-Paul Chapel Editor France 2 France
Nigel Chapman Chief Executive Officer Plan International United Kingdom
Erik Charas Founder and Managing Director Charas LDA Mozambique
Jean Charest
Premier of Quebec, Canada
Bernard Charlès President and Chief Executive Officer Dassault Systèmes SA France
Richard Chartres Bishop The Diocese of London United Kingdom
Chen Deming
Minister of Commerce of the People's
Republic of China
Chen Feng Chairman HNA Group Co. Ltd People's Republic of
China
Chen Wenchi President and Chief Executive Officer VIA Technologies Inc. Taiwan, China
Ian Cheshire Group Chief Executive Kingfisher Plc United Kingdom
Chey Chang-won
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive SK Engineering and
Republic of Korea
Officer
Construction
Chey Jae-won
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive SK Holdings
Republic of Korea
Officer
Chey Tae-won Chairman and Chief Executive Officer SK Holdings Republic of Korea
Hamed El Chiaty Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Travco Group International Egypt
Holding S.A.E
Wellington Chibebe Secretary-General Zimbabwe Congress of Zimbabwe
Trade Unions (ZCTU)
Palaniappan
Minister of Home Affairs of India
Chidambaram
David Childs Managing Partner Clifford Chance LLP United Kingdom
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Calvin Chin Chief Executive Officer Qifang Inc. People's Republic of
China
John Chipman Director-General and Chief Executive International Institute for United Kingdom
Strategic Studies (IISS)
Cho Dong-Sung Professor Seoul National University Republic of Korea
H. S. Cho Senior Vice-President Hyosung Group Republic of Korea
Ken Choi Deputy Executive Editor Chosun Ilbo Republic of Korea
Ashwin C. Choksi Chairman Asian Paints Limited India
Eric Chol
Editor-in-Chief Economics, Politics, La Tribune
France
International
Tejpreet Singh Chopra President and Chief Executive Officer Bharat Light and Power India
Niels B. Christiansen President and Chief Executive Officer Danfoss A/S Denmark
Victor L. L. Chu Chairman and Chief Executive Officer First Eastern Investment Hong Kong SAR
Group
Amy Chua John M. Duff Jr Professor of Law Yale Law School USA
Anatoly B. Chubais Chief Executive Officer Russian Corporation of Russian Federation
Nanotechnologies
(RUSNANO)
Ganhuyag Chuluun Hutagt Vice-Minister of Finance of Mongolia
Euisun Chung Vice-Chairman Hyundai Motor Company Republic of Korea
Sureyya Ciliv Chief Executive Officer Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri Turkey
AS
Jean-François Cirelli Vice-Chairman and President GDF SUEZ France
Liz Claman Anchor Fox Business Network USA
Alan Clark Managing Director SABMiller Europe Switzerland
Helen E. Clark
Administrator, United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP),
New York
Richard T. Clark Chairman Merck & Co. Inc. USA
Susan M. Clark Director, Corporate Affairs SABMiller plc United Kingdom
Wendy Clark
Senior Vice-President, Integrated The Coca-Cola Company USA
Marketing Communications and
Capabilities
Jeff Clarke President and Chief Executive Officer Travelport USA
Michael Clarke
Executive Vice-President, Kraft Foods Kraft Foods Europe GmbH Switzerland
Inc. and President, Kraft Foods
Europe
Tracy Clarke
Group Head, Human Resources and Standard Chartered
United Kingdom
Communications
R. Marcelo Claure Chairman of the Board, Chief
Brightstar Corp.
USA
Executive Officer and President
Nick Clegg
Deputy Prime Minister of the United
Kingdom
Reinhard Clemens Member of the Board of Management Deutsche Telekom AG Germany
and Chief Executive Officer, T-
Systems
Tony Clement
Minister of Industry of Canada
Sanford Climan President Entertainment Media USA
Ventures
William J. Clinton Founder William J. Clinton
USA
Foundation
John H. Clippinger Co-Director, The Law Lab, The Harvard University
USA
Berkman Center for Internet &
Society
Paulo Coelho Author Sant Jordi Asociados Spain
Andrew L. Cohen Managing Director JPMorgan Private Bank Hong Kong SAR
Michael Cohen Chief Executive Officer Och-Ziff Management United Kingdom
Europe Limited
Steven A. Cohen Chairman and Chief Executive Officer S.A.C. Capital Advisors LP USA
Zehavit Cohen
Managing Partner, Head of Israel Apax Partners Israel Ltd Israel
Office
Gary D. Cohn President and Chief Operating Officer The Goldman Sachs Group USA
Inc.
Jared Cohon President Carnegie Mellon University USA
Vittorio Colao Chief Executive Officer Vodafone Group Plc United Kingdom
Andrea Coleman Chief Executive Officer and Founder Riders for Health United Kingdom
Xavier M. Colin
Presenter, Geopolitis News
Swiss Television RTS Switzerland
Programme
Boris Collardi Chief Executive Officer Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd Switzerland
Stephen van Coller Chief Executive Absa Capital South Africa
Paul Collier
Professor of Economics, Department University of Oxford
United Kingdom
of Economics
Francis S. Collins Director National Institutes of Health USA
James Collins Jr President, DuPont Crop Protection DuPont USA
Veronica Colondam Chief Executive Officer YCAB (Yayasan Cinta Anak
Bangsa) Foundation
Indonesia
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
George F. Colony
Chairman of the Board and Chief Forrester Research Inc. USA
Executive Officer
Michel Combes Chief Executive, Europe Vodafone Group Services United Kingdom
Ltd
Patrick Combes Chairman Compagnie Financière Switzerland
Tradition
Kevin E. Comolli Partner Accel Partners United Kingdom
John C. Compton
Chief Executive Officer, PepsiCo PepsiCo Inc.
USA
Americas Foods
Beth Comstock
Senior Vice-President and Chief General Electric Company USA
Marketing Officer
Cristóbal Conde President and Chief Executive Officer SunGard USA
Arturo Condo President INCAE Business School Costa Rica
Peggy Conlon President and Chief Executive Officer Advertising Council USA
Iain Conn
Chief Executive, Refining and BP Plc
United Kingdom
Marketing
John P. Connolly
Chief Executive Officer, United Deloitte
United Kingdom
Kingdom, and Chairman of the Global
Board
John Conroy Jr Head, Global Strategic Initiatives Baker & McKenzie USA
Jérome Contamine Executive Vice-President and Chief Sanofi-Aventis
France
Financial Officer
Scott D. Cook Chairman of the Executive Committee Intuit Inc. USA
Christopher Cooper-Hohn Founder The Children's Investment United Kingdom
Fund Management (UK) LLP
Jean-François Copé Secretary-General, Union for a
Popular Movement (UMP), France
Agustín Coppel Luken Chief Executive Officer Coppel SA de CV Mexico
Ernesto Cordero Arroyo Secretary of Finance of Mexico
Eckhard Cordes Chief Executive Officer METRO GROUP Germany
Tracy Corrigan Editor-in-Chief The Wall Street Journal United Kingdom
Europe
Peter L. Corsell Chairman GridPoint Inc. USA
Luc Cortebeeck President Confederation of Christian Belgium
Trade Unions of Belgium
Delos M. (Toby) Cosgrove Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Cleveland Clinic USA
Cyrille Costes President and Chief Executive Officer Lynx Energy Partners Switzerland
Robert Court Global Head of External Affairs Rio Tinto Plc United Kingdom
Jean-Philippe Courtois President Microsoft International France
Luciano Coutinho President Banco Nacional do
Brazil
Desenvolvimento Econômico
e Social (BNDES)
Howard Cox Advisory Partner Greylock USA
Pamela J. Craig Chief Financial Officer Accenture USA
Aron Cramer President and Chief Executive Officer Business for Social
USA
Responsibility (BSR)
Gerhard Cromme Chairman of the Supervisory Board ThyssenKrupp AG Germany
Audrey Kurth Cronin Professor of Strategy U.S. National War College USA
Patrick M. Cronin
Senior Adviser and Senior Director, The Center for a New USA
Asia Programme
American Security (CNAS)
Daniel Cruise
Vice-President, Public and
Alcoa Inc.
USA
Government Affairs
Yolanda Cuba Non-Executive Director Reunert Ltd South Africa
Daniel Joshua Cullum Global Changemaker British Council New Zealand
H. Lawrence Culp Jr President and Chief Executive Officer Danaher Corporation USA
Sir Jonathan Stephen
Cunliffe
Head of International Economic
Affairs, Europe and G8 Sherpa,
Prime Minister's Office, United
Kingdom
Nelson W. Cunningham Managing Partner McLarty Associates USA
Jean-Pierre Cuoni Chairman EFG International Switzerland
Frederico Fleury Curado President and Chief Executive Officer EMBRAER S.A. Brazil
Neill A. Currie Chief Executive Officer RenaissanceRe Holdings Bermuda
Ltd
Nicholas A. Curtis Executive Chairman Lynas Corporation Limited Australia
Scott Cutler Executive Vice-President NYSE Euronext USA
Geoff Cutmore Anchor CNBC United Kingdom
Stephanie Czerny Managing Director Burda Media Germany
Francisco D'Souza Chief Executive Officer Cognizant Technology USA
Solutions
Vittorio Da Rold
Senior Correspondent, Foreign Il Sole 24 Ore
Italy
Affairs
Amr A. Al Dabbagh Governor, Saudi Arabian General
Investment Authority (SAGIA), Saudi
Arabia
Ibrahim S. Dabdoub Group Chief Executive Officer National Bank of Kuwait Kuwait
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Juan Jose Daboub Founding Chief Executive Officer Global Adaptation Institute USA
Herman Daems Chairman of the Board Gimv NV Belgium
Martin Dahinden Director-General Swiss Agency for
Switzerland
Development and
Cooperation (SDC)
Weili Dai
Co-Founder, Vice-President and Marvell Technology Group USA
General Manager, Communications
and Computing Business
Ltd
Omotayo Dairo Founder and Chief Executive Officer Quintas Renewable Energy Nigeria
Solutions Ltd
Henk van Dalen Chief Financial Officer VimpelCom Ltd Netherlands
Elizabeth Daley Dean, School of Cinematic Arts University of Southern USA
California (USC)
Charles H. Dallara Managing Director Institute of International USA
Finance (IIF)
James Dallas
Senior Vice-President, Quality and Medtronic Inc.
USA
Operations
John Dalli
Commissioner, Health and Consumer
Policy, European Commission,
Brussels
Luke J. Daly Founder and Chief Executive Officer Ferrate Treatment
USA
Technologies
Winston Damarillo Chief Executive Officer Morphlabs Inc. USA
Kommer Damen Chairman Damen Shipyards Group Netherlands
Brian A. Dames Chief Executive Officer Eskom Holdings Limited South Africa
Dang Thanh Tam Chairman Saigon Investment
Vietnam
Corporation
Aliko Dangote President and Chief Executive Officer Dangote Group Nigeria
John Eric Daniels Group Chief Executive Lloyds Banking Group Plc United Kingdom
Ronald J. Daniels President Johns Hopkins University USA
John Daniszewski
Vice-President and Senior Managing The Associated Press (AP) USA
Editor
Richard Danziger Chief of Mission for Sri Lanka International Organization for Sri Lanka
Migration (IOM)
Jacques Daoust President and Chief Executive Officer Investissement Québec Canada
Mazen S. Darwazeh Chairman, MENA Hikma Pharmaceuticals Jordan
Lord Darzi
Professor of Surgery, Imperial
College London and Chair, Institute of
Global Health Innovation
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Limited
St Mary's Hospital
Howard Davies Director London School of
Economics and Political
Science
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
John Davies
Vice-President, Sales and Marketing Intel Corporation
USA
and General Manager, World Ahead
Martyn Davies Chief Executive Officer Frontier Advisory Pty Ltd South Africa
Pat Davies Chief Executive Sasol Limited South Africa
Rob Davies
Minister of Trade and Industry of
South Africa
Simon Davies Firmwide Managing Partner Linklaters LLP United Kingdom
Geoff Davis Chief Executive Officer White Hat Ventures USA
George S. Davis
Executive Vice-President and Chief Applied Materials Inc. USA
Financial Officer
Robert Matthews Davis Vice-President, Public Affairs The Dow Chemical
USA
Company
Sally Davis
Chief Executive Officer, BT
BT Group Plc
United Kingdom
Wholesale
Hussain Dawood Chairman The Dawood Group Pakistan
Robert De Niro Co-Founder Tribeca Enterprises LLC USA
Raymond Debbane President and Chief Executive Officer The Invus Group LLC USA
Jean-Charles Decaux Chairman and Co-Chief Executive JCDecaux SA
France
Officer
Chris Dedicoat President, European Markets Cisco United Kingdom
James Gregory Dees Professor, Practice of Social
Entrepreneurship, Fuqua School of
Business
Duke University
USA
John K. Defterios
Anchor, CNN Marketplace Middle CNN International
United Kingdom
East
John J. DeGioia President Georgetown University USA
Wolfgang J. Dehen Member of the Managing Board and
Chief Executive Officer, Siemens
Energy
Siemens AG
Germany
Marijn E. Dekkers
Chairman of the Board of
Management
Bayer AG
Michael S. Dell Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Dell Inc. USA
Christopher Delong Partner Taconic Capital Advisors LP USA
Germany
Jean-Marc Delpon de President, Consumer Products Olayan Financing Company Saudi Arabia
Vaux
Division
Michel Demaré
Chief Financial Officer and President ABB Ltd
Switzerland
of Global Markets
Jean-François Demole Managing Partner Pictet & Cie Private Bankers Switzerland
David Denison President and Chief Executive Officer Canada Pension Plan Canada
Investment Board
Ozlem Denizmen
Executive Vice-President, Dogus Dogus Group
Turkey
Strategy
Charlie Denson President, Nike Brand Nike Inc. USA
Raghida Dergham
Senior Diplomatic Correspondent and Al Hayat
USA
Columnist
Olga K. Dergunova Member of the Board JSC VTB Bank Russian Federation
Oleg V. Deripaska Chief Executive Officer Basic Element Russian Federation
Jean Desazars de
Group Executive Vice-President, Lafarge
France
Montgailhard
Strategy, Development and Public
Affairs
Pascale-Marie
Deputy Editor-in-Chief Enjeux Les Echos France
Deschamps
Odile Desforges
Executive Vice-President,
Renault SAS
France
Engineering and Quality
Yogesh C. Deveshwar Chairman ITC Limited India
Subhash Dhar
Global Head, Communications, Infosys Technologies Ltd India
Media and Entertainment Business
Arjun Dhawan President, Infrastructure Business Hindustan Construction India
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Company Ltd
Dho Young-Shim
Chairperson of the Board of
Directors, UNWTO ST-EP
Foundation; Member of UN MDG
Advocacy Group, Seoul
Pradeep K. Dhoot President and Vice-Chairman Videocon Industries Ltd and India
other Group Companies
Robert E. Diamond Jr Chief Executive Barclays PLC United Kingdom
Mario Diaz-Balart
Congressman from Florida
(Republican), 21st District, USA
Sergio Díaz-Granados Minister of Trade, Industry and
Tourism of Colombia
Christoph Dichand Editor-in-Chief Kronen Zeitung Austria
Kai Diekmann Editor-in-Chief Bild Germany
Frits van Dijk
Executive Vice-President and Zone Nestlé SA
Switzerland
Director, Asia, Oceania, Africa and
Middle East
Robert L. Dilenschneider President and Chief Executive Officer The Dilenschneider Group USA
Inc.
Theo Dilissen Chairman of the Board Belgacom NV Belgium
Phillip Dilley Chairman Arup Group Ltd United Kingdom
James Dimon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer JPMorgan Chase & Co. USA
Detlef Dinsel Managing Partner IK Investment Partners Germany
GmbH
Jacques Diouf
Director-General, Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations (FAO), Rome
Laurie L. Dippenaar Chairman FirstRand Ltd South Africa
Elizabeth Dipuo Peters Minister of Energy of South Africa
Hugo Dixon Editor Thomson Reuters, Reuters United Kingdom
Breakingviews
Dian Triansyah Djani Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of Indonesia to the
United Nations, Geneva
Kirill Dmitriev President Icon Private Equity Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Dmitriev Chairman State Corporation Bank for Russian Federation
Development and Foreign
Economic Affairs
(Vnesheconombank)
Steve Dobbs Senior Group President Fluor Corporation USA
Evgeny Dod Chief Executive Officer JSC RusHydro Russian Federation
Colin Dodge
Executive Vice-President and Chief Nissan Motor Co. Limited Japan
Recovery Officer
Volkert Doeksen
Chief Executive Officer and Managing AlpInvest Partners NV Netherlands
Partner
Vuslat Dogan Sabanci Chairwoman Hurriyet Publishing & Turkey
Printing Co.
Andrew Doman President and Chief Executive Officer Russell Investments USA
Donald F. Donahue Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The Depository Trust &
Clearing Corporation
(DTCC)
USA
Thomas Donaldson Professor of Legal Studies The Wharton School, USA
University of Pennsylvania
Thomas J. Donohue President and Chief Executive Officer US Chamber of Commerce USA
Mathias Döpfner Chief Executive Officer Axel Springer AG Germany
Christian Dorer Editor-in-Chief Aargauer Zeitung Switzerland
Rolf Dörig Chairman, Adecco Group Adecco Management and Switzerland
Consulting SA
Abdulla Falah Abdulla Al
Dosari
Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of the State of Qatar
to the United Nations, Geneva
Bharat Doshi
Executive Director and Chief
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd India
Financial Officer
Brady W. Dougan Chief Executive Officer Credit Suisse AG Switzerland
Trevor Richard Dougherty Global Changemaker British Council USA
Nigel Doughty Executive Co-Chairman Doughty Hanson & Co. United Kingdom
Arif Dowla Managing Director Advanced Chemical
Bangladesh
Industries Ltd
William Downe President and Chief Executive Officer BMO Financial Group Canada
John Doyle
General Manager, Transformational Ascension Health
USA
Development and Chief Strategy
Officer
Mario Draghi
Governor of the Bank of Italy and
Chairman, Financial Stability Board,
Italy
Margo Drakos
Co-Founder and Chief Operating InstantEncore.com
USA
Officer
Jeffrey M. Drazen Editor-in-Chief The New England Journal of USA
Medicine
David C. Drummond Senior Vice-President, Corporate Google Inc.
USA
Development and Chief Legal Officer
Jamie C. Drummond Executive Director ONE United Kingdom
Nadine Drutman
Chief of Staff to the Chief Executive Absa Group Ltd
South Africa
Officer
John P. Drzik President and Chief Executive Officer Oliver Wyman Group USA
((M&MC)
Jeffrey Dubin Head of News and Events European Broadcasting Switzerland
Union (EBU)
Pierre Duhaime Chief Executive Officer SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. Canada
Willem van Duin Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Eureko BV Netherlands
Mike Duke President and Chief Executive Officer Wal-Mart Stores Inc. USA
H.R.H. Duke of York UK Special Representative for
Serge Dumont
International Trade and Investment
Senior Vice-President, President,
Asia Pacific, India, Middle East and
Africa, and Chairman, Asia Pacific
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Omnicom Group Inc.
People's Republic of
China
Marco Dunand Co-Founder and Chairman Mercuria Energy Group Ltd Switzerland
Jürgen Dunsch Senior Economics Editor Frankfurter Allgemeine Switzerland
Zeitung
Brian Duperreault President and Chief Executive Officer Marsh & McLennan
USA
Companies Inc. (M&MC)
Turgay Durak Chief Executive Officer Koç Holding AS Turkey
Nicandro Durante Chief Executive, Designate British American Tobacco United Kingdom
Plc
Kelvin Dushnisky
Executive Vice-President, Corporate Barrick Gold Corporation Canada
Affairs
Gary Dushnitsky
Associate Professor of Strategic and
International Management and
Entrepreneurship
London Business School United Kingdom
Barkha Dutt Group Editor, English News New Delhi Television India
(NDTV)
Soumitra Dutta
The Roland Berger Chaired Professor
in Business and Technology
INSEAD
Arkady Dvorkovich Aide to the President, G8 Affairs,
Office of the President, Russian
Federation
Colin Dyer President and Chief Executive Officer Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. USA
France
Alexander V. Dyukov Chairman and Chief Executive Officer JSC Gazprom Neft Russian Federation
Victor J. Dzau President and Chief Executive Officer Duke University Medical USA
Center and Health System
Marcelo Luis Ebrard Mayor of Mexico City
Casaubón
Paul N. Eckley Senior Vice-President, Investments State Farm Insurance USA
Companies
Elizabeth C. Economy C. V. Starr Senior Fellow and
Council on Foreign Relations USA
Director, Asia Studies
Richard W. Edelman President and Chief Executive Officer Edelman USA
Brigitte Ederer
Member of the Managing Board and Siemens AG
Germany
Head, Corporate Human Resources
Agustin E. Edwards President of the Board Empresa Periodistica El Chile
Mercurio SAP
Bruce Edwards
Chief Executive Officer, DHL Supply Deutsche Post DHL
Germany
Chain
John Ehara Partner and Representative Director Unison Capital Inc. Japan
Jack Ehnes Chief Executive Officer California State Teachers' USA
Retirement System
(CalSTRS)
Ralph Eichler President ETH Zurich Switzerland
Espen Barth Eide
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of
Norway
Jörg Eigendorf
Chief Reporter, Member of the Die Welt
Germany
Editorial Board
Maria Eitel
President and Chief Executive Nike Inc.
USA
Officer, Nike Foundation
Stuart E. Eizenstat Partner and Head, International Covington & Burling LLP USA
Trade and Finance
Daniel Ek Chief Executive Officer Spotify Ltd United Kingdom
Klas Eklund Adjunct Professor of Economics University of Lund Sweden
Hisham El-Khazindar Managing Director and Co-Founder Citadel Capital S.A.E. Egypt
Christopher J. Elias President and Chief Executive Officer PATH (Programme for USA
Appropriate Technology in
Health)
Johan Eliasch Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Head NV United Kingdom
Olafur Eliasson Artist Studio Olafur Eliasson Denmark
Gerri Elliott
Executive Vice-President, Strategic Juniper Networks Inc. USA
Alliances
Lawrence Elliott Economics Editor The Guardian United Kingdom
Michael J. Elliott
Editor, Time International, and Time Magazine
USA
Deputy Managing Editor
Stephen Ellis Worldwide Managing Director Bain & Company Inc. USA
Sir Vernon J. Ellis Chair British Council United Kingdom
David T. Ellwood Dean Harvard Kennedy School USA
Eduardo S. Elsztain Chairman IRSA Inversiones y
Argentina
Representaciones SA
Craig Emerson
Minister of Trade of Australia
Thomas Enders Chief Executive Officer Airbus SAS France
Ditlev Engel President and Chief Executive Officer Vestas Wind Systems A/S Denmark
Klaus Engel Chief Executive Officer Evonik Industries AG Germany
Richard P. Eno Chief Executive Officer Metabolix USA
David R. Epstein Head, Pharma Division Novartis AG Switzerland
Mary Callahan Erdoes Chief Executive Officer, Asset JPMorgan Chase & Co. USA
Management
Charles W. Ergen
Chairman, President and Chief DISH Network
USA
Executive Officer
Paula Escobar Editor-in-Chief, Magazines Empresa Periodistica El Chile
Mercurio SAP
Patricia Espinosa
Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico
Cantellano
Shelly Esque Vice-President, Corporate Affairs Intel Corporation USA
Dan Esty Professor Yale University USA
John Evans General Secretary Trade Union Advisory France
Committee to the OECD
Stuart Evans Chief Executive Officer Novacem United Kingdom
Bob Every Chairman Wesfarmers Limited Australia
Vladimir Evtushenkov Chairman of the Board of Directors Sistema JSFC Russian Federation
Anna Ewing
Executive Vice-President and Chief The NASDAQ OMX Group USA
Information Officer
Jack Ewing European Economics Correspondent International Herald Tribune Germany
Augie K. Fabela II Co-Founder and Chairman Emeritus VimpelCom Ltd Netherlands
David Faber Anchor CNBC USA
Joachim Faber Chief Executive Officer Allianz Global Investors AG Germany
Carlos Jose Fadigas Chief Executive Officer Braskem SA Brazil
Jeffrey Fager Executive Producer, 60 Minutes CBS News USA
Imad Fakhoury
Minister of State for Mega Projects of
the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
Nolitha V. Fakude Executive Director Sasol Limited South Africa
Khalid A. Al Falih President and Chief Executive Officer Saudi Aramco Saudi Arabia
Annika Falkengren President and Chief Executive Officer Skandinaviska Enskilda Sweden
Banken (SEB)
Fan Shenggen Director-General International Food Policy USA
Research Institute (IFPRI)
Werner Faymann
Federal Chancellor of Austria
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Salam Fayyad
Prime Minister of the Palestinian
National Authority
David J. Fear President ZBI Europe LLC United Kingdom
Pavel Federov
First Vice-President, Strategy and Rosneft Oil Company Russian Federation
Finance
Yury Fedotov
Executive Director, United Nations
Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC),
Vienna
Daniel Feffer Vice-President Suzano Holding SA Brazil
Franz Fehrenbach Chief Executive Officer Robert Bosch GmbH Germany
Stephen Feinberg Chief Executive Officer Cerberus Capital
Management LP
USA
Peter Fellman Editor-in-Chief Dagens Industri Sweden
Feng Jun Chief Executive Officer Aigo Digital Technology Co.
Ltd
Niall Ferguson Professor of History Harvard University USA
José Antonio Fernández Chairman and Chief Executive Officer FEMSA Mexico
Carbajal
Leonel Fernández
President of the Dominican Republic
Bruno Ferrari
Secretary of the Economy of Mexico
John F. Ferraro Global Chief Operating Officer Ernst & Young United Kingdom
Jose Ferreira Founder and Chief Executive Officer Knewton Inc. USA
Carola Ferstl Editor and Presenter N-TV Germany
Michael Fertik Founder and Chief Executive Officer ReputationDefender Inc. USA
Stephen Fidler Brussels Editor The Wall Street Journal Belgium
Christiana Figueres Executive Secretary, United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC), Bonn
Joshua Fink Chief Executive Officer Enso Capital Management
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
People's Republic of
China
LLC
Daniel Finkelstein Executive Editor The Times United Kingdom
Anne M. Finucane Global Strategy and Marketing Officer Bank of America USA
Marco Fiorese Co-Founder The Monaco-Asia Society Monaco
Peter A. Fischer
Economics Editor and Head,
Neue Zürcher Zeitung Switzerland
Economics Department
Stanley Fischer
Governor of the Central Bank of
Israel
Peter Fitch Head of Communications Lloyd's United Kingdom
Niall FitzGerald Deputy Chairman Thomson Reuters United Kingdom
James M. Flaherty Minister of Finance of Canada
Rob Flaherty Senior Partner and President Ketchum Inc. USA
Michael Flammini Head, Enterprise Strategic Planning Aetna Inc. USA
Ryan Flanagan President, Protective Packaging Sealed Air Corp. USA
Stephanie Flanders Economics Editor BBC World News United Kingdom
Bruce Flatt
Senior Managing Partner and Chief Brookfield Asset
Canada
Executive Officer
Management Inc.
Sam Fleming Economics Editor The Times United Kingdom
Paul Fletcher Senior Partner Actis LLP United Kingdom
Richard Fletcher City Editor The Daily Telegraph United Kingdom
Olivier Fleurot Chief Executive Officer MSL Group France
Douglas Flint Group Chairman HSBC Holdings Plc United Kingdom
Joerg Floeck
Managing Director and Global Head,
Sales and Customer Service
Thomson Reuters
Timothy P. Flynn Chairman KPMG International USA
Alexandra Föderl-Schmid Editor-in-Chief Der Standard Austria
Robert L. Forbes President ForbesLife USA
James A. Forese
Head of Global Markets, Institutional Citi
USA
Clients Group
Vincent A. Forlenza President and Chief Operating Officer Becton, Dickinson and USA
Company
Eric Foss Chief Executive Officer Pepsi Beverages Company USA
George Foster
Paul L. and Phyllis Wattis Professor
in Business and Dhirubhai Ambani
Fellow in Entrepreneurship
Stanford Graduate School of
Business
USA
Mark Foster
Jane E. Fountain
Group Chief Executive, Global
Markets and Management Consulting
Professor of Political Science and
Public Policy and Director, National
Center for Digital Government
Accenture
University of Massachusetts
USA
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Justin Fox Editorial Director Harvard Business Review USA
Group
Alain Frachon Editorial Director Le Monde France
Reto Francioni Chief Executive Officer Deutsche Börse AG Germany
Barney Frank
Congressman from Massachusetts
(Democrat), 4th District, USA
Christoph Franz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Deutsche Lufthansa AG Germany
USA
Fabrizio Freda President and Chief Executive Officer Estee Lauder Companies USA
Inc.
Andy Freire Chairman Endeavor Argentina
Julio Frenk Dean Harvard School of Public USA
Health
Jacob A. Frenkel
Chairman JPMorgan Chase
JPMorgan Chase & Co. USA
International
Rainer-Marc Frey Chairman of the Board of Directors Horizon21 AG Switzerland
Aurelia Frick
Minister of Foreign Affairs of
Liechtenstein
Thomas Fricke Chief Economist The Financial Times
Germany
Deutschland
Linda P. Fried
Dean and DeLamar Professor of Mailman School of Public USA
Public Health
Health, Columbia University
James Eugene Frieda Global Strategist Moore Capital Management United Kingdom
LLC
Peter Friedli President Friedli Corporate Finance Switzerland
Adena Friedman Chief Financial Officer The NASDAQ OMX Group USA
Alan G. Friedman Executive Editor and Anchor FBC Group Ltd United Kingdom
Robert Friedman Editor-at-Large, Finance Bloomberg News USA
Thomas L. Friedman Columnist, Foreign Affairs The New York Times USA
Michael T. Fries President and Chief Executive Officer Liberty Global Inc. USA
Michael Froman
Deputy Assistant to the US President;
Deputy National Security Adviser for
International Economic Affairs, USA
Douglas Frye
Global President and Chief Executive Colliers International USA
Officer
Akio Fujii Columnist, Senior Correspondent Nihon Keizai Shimbun United Kingdom
(Nikkei)
Hidetoshi Fujisawa Executive Commentator NHK (Japan Broadcasting Japan
Corporation)
Kumi Fujisawa Tsunoda Co-Founder Think Tank SophiaBank Japan
Joseph B. Fuller
Co-Founder and Chief Executive The Monitor Group
USA
Officer
Chikara Funabashi President Will Seed Co. Ltd Japan
Dame Clara Furse Non-Excutive Director Nomura International Plc United Kingdom
Zev Furst Chairman and Chief Executive Officer First International Resources USA
LLC
Omar A. Al Futtaim Vice-Chairman Al Futtaim Trading Group United Arab Emirates
J. Erik Fyrwald Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Nalco Company USA
M. Shafik Gabr Chairman and Managing Director ARTOC Group for
Egypt
Investment and
Development
Peter B. Gabriel Founder Real World United Kingdom
Jitesh Gadhia Senior Managing Director The Blackstone Group United Kingdom
Orit Gadiesh Chairman Bain & Company Inc. USA
Chantal Gaemperle Group Executive Vice-President, LVMH Moët Hennessy - France
Human Resources and Synergies Louis Vuitton
Brian A. Gallagher President and Chief Executive Officer United Way Worldwide USA
Robert L. Gallucci President MacArthur Foundation USA
Gila Gamliel
Deputy Minister for Advancement of
Young People, Students and Women,
Office of the Prime Minister, Israel
Stephen Gandel Senior Writer Time Magazine USA
Venkatesh Babu
Managing Director Lanco Infratech Ltd India
Gangarap
Gao Jifan Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Trina Solar Ltd People's Republic of
China
Gao Xiqing
President and Vice-Chairman, China
Investment Corporation (CIC),
People's Republic of China
Javier Garcia-Martinez Professor University of Alicante Spain
Katherine Garrett-Cox Chief Executive Officer Alliance Trust Plc United Kingdom
Timothy Garton Ash Professor of European Studies University of Oxford United Kingdom
Armando Garza Sada Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Alfa Mexico
Melinda French Gates Co-Chair Bill & Melinda Gates
USA
Foundation
William H. Gates III Co-Chair Bill & Melinda Gates
USA
Foundation
Gatot Mudiantoro
President Director
PT Bank Negara Indonesia Indonesia
Suwondo
(Persero) Tbk
Katherine M. Gehl Chairman Gehl Foods USA
Horst F. Geicke Executive Chairman VinaCapital Group Hong Kong SAR
Jürgen M. Geissinger President and Chief Executive Officer Schaeffler Group Germany
Timothy F. Geithner US Secretary of the Treasury
Paul Geitner Business Editor International Herald Tribune United Kingdom
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Bekele Geleta Secretary-General International Federation of Switzerland
Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies (IFRC)
Richard L. Gelfond Chief Executive Officer Imax Corporation USA
Eli Gelman Chief Executive Officer Amdocs Management Ltd USA
Pierre Gentin Managing Director, Legal and Risk Credit Suisse USA
William W. George Professor of Management Practice Harvard Business School USA
Julie Louise Gerberding President, Merck Vaccines Merck & Co. Inc. USA
David R. Gergen Director, Center for Public Leadership Harvard Kennedy School USA
Valery Gergiev Artistic and General Director Mariinsky Theatre Russian Federation
Valerie Germain
Managing Partner, Strategy and Heidrick & Struggles
USA
Business Development
Nataliya Germanova Managing Director, Marketing Sberbank Russian Federation
Tillman U. Gerngross Co-Founder and Chief Executive
Officer
Adimab Inc.
USA
Olaf Gersemann Business Editor Welt am Sonntag Germany
Minelik Getahun
Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of Ethiopia to the
United Nations, Geneva
Aart J. de Geus Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Synopsys Inc. USA
Federico Ghizzoni Chief Executive Officer UniCredit Italy
Carlos Ghosn Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Renault-Nissan Alliance France
Abdul Aziz Al Ghurair Chief Executive Officer Mashreqbank PSC United Arab Emirates
Majid S. Al Ghurair Chief Executive Officer Al-Ghurair Group of
Companies
Julie Gichuru
Group Digital Business Manager and Royal Media Services
TV Host
Sir John Gieve Senior Fellow Belfer Center for Science
and International Affairs,
Harvard University
Clément Gignac President and General Manager Société Générale de
Financement du Québec
(SGF)
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
United Arab Emirates
Kenya
USA
Canada
Mark Gilbert
Senior Columnist, London Bureau Bloomberg BusinessWeek United Kingdom
Chief
Chris Giles Economics Editor The Financial Times United Kingdom
Mack Gill President, Global Services SunGard USA
Ambassador Dan
Chairman Markstone Capital Group Israel
Gillerman
Sarah Gillett
Ambassador of the United Kingdom
to Switzerland
Trond Giske
Minister of Trade and Industry of
Norway
Jane Gladstone Senior Managing Director Evercore Partners Inc. USA
Ivan Glasenberg Chief Executive Officer Glencore International AG Switzerland
Daniel Glaser Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Marsh Inc. (M&MC) USA
Amy Glasmeier
Professor of Geography and Regional MIT - Department of Urban USA
Planning and Head
Studies and Planning
Robert Glasser Secretary-General Care International Switzerland
Susan Beth Glasser Editor-in-Chief Foreign Policy Magazine USA
Thomas H. Glocer Chief Executive Officer Thomson Reuters USA
Richard J. Gnodde Co-Chief Executive Officer Goldman Sachs
International
Jules Goddard
Research Fellow, Management London Business School
Innovation Lab
Pierre Godé Senior Executive Vice-President LVMH Moët Hennessy - France
Louis Vuitton
Sunil Godhwani Chairman and Managing Director Religare Enterprises Ltd India
Adi B. Godrej Chairman, The Godrej Group Godrej Industries Ltd India
Jamshyd N. Godrej Chairman and Managing Director Godrej & Boyce Mfg Co. Ltd India
Daniel Goffart Editor, Economic and Political News Handelsblatt Germany
Donald J. Gogel President and Chief Executive Officer Clayton, Dubilier & Rice LLC USA
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Rick Goings Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Tupperware Brands
USA
Corporation
Ayla Göksel Chief Executive Officer ACEV/Ozyegin Foundation Turkey
Yair Goldfinger
Co-Founder and Chief Technology Dotomi
Israel
Officer
Ian Goldin Director, Oxford Martin School University of Oxford United Kingdom
Neal Goldman Chairman Connectivity Data Systems USA
Daniel Goleman
Co-Director, Consortium for Research
on Emotional Intelligence in
Organizations
Rutgers University
USA
Peter Gomez Chairman of the Board of Directors SIX Group AG Switzerland
Francisco González Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Spain
Argentaria SA
Jim Goodnight Chief Executive Officer SAS Institute Inc. USA
Kris Gopalakrishnan Chief Executive Officer and Managing Infosys Technologies Ltd India
Director
Pravin Gordhan
Minister of Finance of South Africa
Ilene S. Gordon
Chairman, President and Chief Corn Products International USA
Executive Officer
Inc.
Adrian Gore Chief Executive Officer Discovery Holdings Ltd South Africa
Sergey Gorkov Deputy Chairman of the Board Sberbank Russian Federation
Barry M. Gosin Chief Executive Officer Newmark Knight Frank USA
Sigmund Gottlieb Editor-in-Chief ARD TV (BR) Germany
Nik Gowing Main Presenter BBC World News United Kingdom
Naresh K. Goyal Chairman Jet Airways (India) Limited India
Richard Goyder
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Wesfarmers Limited
Australia
Director
Ileana Grabitz Senior Economic Correspondent Die Welt Germany
Carol Graham
Charles Robinson Chair in Foreign The Brookings Institution USA
Policy Studies
Anne Graham Lotz Founder AnGeL Ministries USA
Michael D. Granoff Chief Executive Officer Pomona Capital USA
Hugh Grant
Chairman, President and Chief Monsanto Company
USA
Executive Officer
Peter T. Grauer Chairman Bloomberg LP USA
Mario Greco
Member of the Group Executive Zurich Financial Services Switzerland
Committee and Chief Executive
Officer, General Insurance
Andy Green Chief Executive Officer Logica Plc United Kingdom
Stephen Green
Minister of State for Trade and
Investment of the United Kingdom
William D. Green Chairman Accenture USA
Sanford D. Greenberg Chairman and Chief Executive Officer TEI Industries LLC USA
Jeff Greene President Florida Sunshine
USA
Investments
Michelle Greene
Vice-President, Head, Corporate NYSE Euronext
USA
Responsibility and Executive Director,
NYSE Foundation
Robert Greenhill
Managing Director and Chief
Business Officer, World Economic
Forum
Herman Gref
Chairman of the Board and Chief Sberbank
Russian Federation
Executive Officer
Robert Greifeld Chief Executive Officer The NASDAQ OMX Group USA
Françoise Gri President, France Manpower Inc. France
Aram Grigorian Managing Director Troika Dialog Group Russian Federation
Olafur Ragnar Grimsson President of Iceland
Daniel Gros Director Centre for European Policy Belgium
Studies (CEPS)
Bill Gross Co-Founder and Chairman eSolar Inc. USA
Daniel Gross Business Columnist Newsweek USA
Jürgen R. Grossmann President and Chief Executive Officer RWE AG Germany
Steve Grove Head, News and Politics YouTube Inc. USA
Oswald J. Grübel Group Chief Executive Officer UBS AG Switzerland
John J. Grumbar Honorary Chairman Egon Zehnder International United Kingdom
Hubertus von Grünberg Chairman of the Board ABB Ltd Switzerland
Gu Binglin President Tsinghua University People's Republic of
China
Gu Liping
Chief Executive and Chairman,
Committee of Experts
Youth Business China People's Republic of
China
Nizan Guanaes Chairman Grupo ABC Brazil
Karel Gucht
Commissioner for Trade, European
Commission, Brussels
Jean-Marie Guéhenno Arnold Saltzman Professor of
Columbia University
USA
Professional Practice
Francesco P. Guerrera US Finance and Business Editor The Financial Times USA
Robert Guest Business Editor The Economist United Kingdom
Momar Guèye
Deputy Permanent Representative Permanent Mission of Switzerland
and Chargé d'Affaires a.i.
Senegal
Ajit Gulabchand Chairman and Managing Director Hindustan Construction India
Company Ltd
Mina Guli
Executive Director and Chief
Investment Officer
Peony Capital Limited People's Republic of
China
Stuart T. Gulliver Group Chief Executive Officer HSBC Holdings Plc United Kingdom
Guo Ping Board Director Huawei Technologies Co.
Ltd
People's Republic of
China
Guo Zhenxi Director, Business Channel China Central Television
CCTV-2
People's Republic of
China
Anant Gupta President HCL Technologies Ltd India
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Rajat Kumar Gupta Chairman International Chamber of France
Commerce (ICC)
Sanjay Gupta Chief Medical Correspondent CNN International USA
Shekhar Gupta Editor-in-Chief The Indian Express
India
Newspapers Ltd
Chander Prakash Gurnani Chief Executive Officer Mahindra Satyam India
Angel Gurría
Secretary-General, Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD), Paris
Francis Gurry
Director-General, World Intellectual
Property Organization (WIPO),
Geneva
Klaus-Peter Gushurst Senior Vice-President, Director of Booz & Company
Germany
Global Board
Antonio Guterres
UN High Commissioner for Refugees,
Geneva
Amy Gutmann President University of Pennsylvania USA
Karl-Theodor Freiherr zu
Guttenberg
Federal Minister of Defence of the
Federal Republic of Germany
Lino Guzzella Professor ETH Zurich Switzerland
Bonnie W. Gwin Managing Partner, Board Practice Heidrick & Struggles USA
H.R.H. Haakon of Norway Crown Prince of Norway
Felix Haas
Chief Executive Officer and Head of amiando AG
Germany
Product
Richard N. Haass President Council on Foreign Relations USA
Edgard Habib Chief Economist Chevron Corporation USA
Francesca von Habsburg Chairman Thyssen Bornemisza Art Austria
Contemporary
Michael E. Haefliger Executive and Artistic Director Lucerne Festival Switzerland
Gerd Haeusler Chief Executive Officer BayernLB Germany
Ahmed Hafez Adviser National Bank of Kuwait Kuwait
Nada Abbas Haffadh Member of the Shura Council of
Bahrain
Jamil El Hage Head, Business News Al Arabiya United Arab Emirates
Stein Erik Hagen Chairman Canica AS Norway
Mikael Hagström President, EMEA and Asia Pacific SAS Institute Inc. USA
Priya Haji
Co-Founder and Former Chief WorldofGood.com by eBay USA
Executive Officer
Inc.
Jahangir Hajiyev Chairman of the Board International Bank of Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Victor Halberstadt Professor of Public Economics Leiden University Netherlands
Ueli Haldimann Owner and Founder Unlimited Communications Switzerland
Roshi Joan Halifax Founder, Abbot, Upaya Zen Center,
USA
Eugene Hall Chief Executive Officer Gartner Inc. USA
Wendy Hall
Dean, Faculty of Physical and University of Southampton United Kingdom
Applied Sciences; Trustee and
Programme Director, Web Science
Trust
Heinz Haller
Executive Vice-President and Chief The Dow Chemical
USA
Commercial Officer
Company
Tarja Halonen
President of Finland
Martin C. Halusa Chief Executive Officer Apax Partners LLP United Kingdom
O. Andreas Halvorsen Founder and Chief Executive Officer Viking Global Investors LP USA
George C. Halvorson Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Kaiser Foundation Health USA
Plan Inc.
Junichi Hamada President The University of Tokyo Japan
Ali Hamadé Journalist and Editorialist An-Nahar Lebanon
Jürgen Hambrecht Chairman of the Board of Executive BASF SE
Germany
Directors
Andrew Hamilton Vice-Chancellor University of Oxford United Kingdom
Mohamed Bin Dhaen Al
Hamli
Minister of Energy of the United Arab
Emirates
Han Seung-Soo Chairman Global Green Growth Republic of Korea
Institute (GGGI)
Harish Hande Managing Director SELCO Solar Light (P) India
Limited
Paul Hanratty
Chief Executive Officer, Long Term Old Mutual Life Assurance South Africa
Savings and Chairman
Company Limited
Tim Hanstad President and Chief Executive Officer Landesa USA
Hao Jiming
Academician and Professor,
Department of Environmental
Tsinghua University
People's Republic of
China
Science and Engineering
Donald R. Harkleroad President The Bristol Company USA
Poppy Harlow Anchor, CNNMoney.com CNN USA
Fredric W. Harman Managing Partner Oak Investment Partners USA
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Christine Harper Chief Financial Correspondent Bloomberg LP USA
Matthew J. Harrington President and Chief Executive Edelman
USA
Officer, USA
Phillip J. Harrington Executive Vice-President, Risk and CA Technologies
USA
Chief Administrative Officer
Erich Harsch Chief Executive Officer dm drogerie markt GMBH + Germany
Co. KG
Stephanie Pullings Hart Vice-President, Supply Chain and Nestle - Jenny Craig Inc. USA
Corporate Services
Yasuchika Hasegawa President and Chief Executive Officer Takeda Pharmaceutical Japan
Company Ltd
Muhadditha Al Hashimi Chief Executive Officer Mohammed Bin Rashid Al United Arab Emirates
Maktoum Academic Medical
Center
Joergen Ole Haslestad President and Chief Executive Officer Yara International ASA Norway
Anne Hastings Managing Director Fonkoze Haiti
Takashi Hatchoji
Representative Executive Officer and Hitachi Ltd
Japan
Executive Vice-President
Gary A. Haugen President and Chief Executive Officer International Justice Mission USA
(IJM)
Carl Hausmann
Managing Director, Global
Bunge Limited
USA
Government and Corporate Affairs
Ricardo Hausmann Director, Center for International Harvard Kennedy School USA
Development
Julien Hawari
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Trends
United Arab Emirates
Editor-in-Chief
Michael Hay
Professor of Management Practice in London Business School United Kingdom
Entrepreneurship
Yasuo Hayashi Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Japan External Trade Japan
Organization (JETRO)
Richard Haythornthwaite Chairman of the Board of Directors MasterCard Worldwide United Kingdom
He Yafei
Ambassador and Permanent
Permanent Mission of the Switzerland
Representative of the People's
Republic of China
People's Republic of China
Jeffrey Hedberg Acting Chief Executive Officer Telkom Group Limited South Africa
Connie Hedegaard Commissioner, Climate Action,
European Commission, Brussels
Hassan Heikal Chief Executive Officer EFG Hermes Holding Egypt
Stephan Heimbach Corporate Vice-President; Head, Siemens AG
Germany
Corporate Communications and
Government Affairs
Axel C. Heitmann
Chairman of the Board of
LANXESS AG
Germany
Management
Jochem Heizmann Member of the Board of Management Volkswagen AG Germany
Ulf Peter Hellstrøm Senior Staff Correspondent Aftenposten Norway
Gideon Henderson Co-Director, 21st Century Ocean University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Institute, Oxford Martin School
Ulf Henriksson Chief Executive Officer Invensys Plc United Kingdom
Mary Kay Henry International President Service Employees
USA
International Union (SEIU)
Simon Henry Chief Financial Officer Royal Dutch Shell Plc Netherlands
Hugh S. Herman Chairman Investec Ltd South Africa
Paul Hermelin
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Capgemini
France
Officer
Adolfo Hernandez
President, Europe, Middle East and Alcatel-Lucent
France
Africa and Executive Vice-President
Diego Hernandez Chief Executive Officer Corporación Nacional del Chile
Cobre de Chile (CODELCO)
Kenneth A. Hersh Founder and Chief Executive Officer NGP Energy Capital
USA
Management
Shannon S. Herzfeld Vice-President, Government
Archer Daniels Midland Co. USA
Relations
(ADM)
Rolf-Dieter Heuer Director-General European Organization for Switzerland
Nuclear Research (CERN)
Uwe J. Heuser Economic and Business Editor Die Zeit Germany
Rob Heyvaert Corporate Executive Vice-President Fidelity National Information USA
Services, Inc.
William V. Hickey President and Chief Executive Officer Sealed Air Corp. USA
Hans Hickler
Chief Executive Officer, Asia Pacific Agility
Hong Kong SAR
Region
Heinrich Hiesinger Chairman of the Executive Board ThyssenKrupp AG Germany
Martin Hilb Managing Director Institute for Leadership and Switzerland
Human Resource
Management (IFPM)
Philipp M. Hildebrand Chairman of the Governing Board,
Swiss National Bank, Switzerland
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Jon Hilsenrath Chief Economic Correspondent The Wall Street Journal USA
Gopichand P. Hinduja Chairman Hinduja Automotive Ltd United Kingdom
Prakash P. Hinduja Chairman, Europe Hinduja Group of Companies Switzerland
Leslie Hinton Chief Executive Officer Dow Jones & Company Inc. USA
Eric Hippeau Special Partner and Adviser Softbank Capital USA
Priya Hiranandani- Founder and Co-Chairman Hirco Group India
Vandrevala
Naomi Hirose
Managing Director; International
Affairs, Real Estate, Acquisition &
Management Dept.
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Tokyo Electric Power
Company (TEPCO)
Japan
Susan Hockfield President Massachusetts Institute of USA
Technology (MIT)
Mark Hoffman President, CNBC NBC Universal Inc. USA
Reid Hoffman Executive Chairman and Founder LinkedIn Corporation USA
André S. Hoffmann Chairman Massellaz SA Switzerland
Karl Hofmann President and Chief Executive Officer Population Services
USA
International (PSI)
Joseph M. Hogan Chief Executive Officer ABB Ltd Switzerland
Paul R. Hogan Chairman and Founder Home Instead Inc USA
Tom Hogan
Executive Vice-President, Enterprise Hewlett-Packard Company USA
Sales, Marketing and Strategy
Alec Hogg Editor-in-Chief Moneyweb Holdings South Africa
Harry Hohmeister Chief Executive Officer Swiss International Air Lines Switzerland
Ltd
Sir John Holmes Director The Ditchley Foundation United Kingdom
Stefan von Holtzbrinck President and Chief Executive Officer Verlagsgruppe Georg von Germany
Holtzbrinck GmbH
Jan Hommen Chief Executive Officer ING Group Netherlands
Hong Ki-Joon President and Chief Executive Officer Hanwha Chemical
Republic of Korea
Corporation
Hong Shen Bureau Chief, China Dow Jones Newswires People's Republic of
China
René Hooft Graafland Member of the Executive Board and Heineken International Netherlands
Chief Financial Officer
John L. Hopkins Group Executive Fluor Corporation USA
Yoshito Hori
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Globis Group; President and
Dean, Globis University; Managing
Partner, Globis Capital Partners
GLOBIS Corporation Japan
Tsutomu Horiuchi
Robert D. Hormats
Chief Financial Officer and Senior
Managing Director
US Undersecretary of State for
Economic, Energy and Agricultural
Affairs
Mori Building Company
Limited
Japan
Douglas H. Horswill Senior Vice-President, Sustainability Teck Resources Limited Canada
and External Affairs
John Hourican
Chief Executive Officer, Global
Banking and Markets
Royal Bank of Scotland
Lloyd Walter Howell Jr Executive Vice-President Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. USA
W. Lee Howell Managing Director, Head of
Programming and Global Agenda
Councils, World Economic Forum
Rumen Hranov M. Sc. Chairman Finman AG Switzerland
Hsu Ta-Lin Chairman H&Q Asia Pacific USA
United Kingdom
George Hu
Executive Vice-President, Marketing Salesforce.com
USA
and Alliances
Ken Hu
Board Member and Executive Vice-
President
Huawei Technologies Co.
Ltd
People's Republic of
China
Hu Shuli Editor-in-Chief Caixin Media People's Republic of
China
Philippe Huber Co-Chief Executive Officer Kentaro Ltd United Kingdom
Ian Hudson
President, Europe, Middle East and DuPont De Nemours Switzerland
Africa
International SA
Arianna Huffington Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Huffington Post USA
Peter van Hüllen Chief Executive Officer Georgsmarienhütte Holding Germany
GmbH
Göran Hultin Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Caden Corporation United Kingdom
Glenn H. Hutchins Founder and Co-Chief Executive Silver Lake USA
William N. Hutton Columnist The Guardian United Kingdom
David Iakobachvili Chairman of the Board of Directors Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
OJSC
Herminia Ibarra
The Cora Chaired Professor of INSEAD
Leadership and Learning and
Professor of Organizational
Behaviour
Russian Federation
France
Riswinandi Idris Deputy President Director PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Indonesia
Enrique V. Iglesias Secretary-General, SEGIB Secretaría
General Iberoamericana, Spain
David Ignatius Associate Editor and Columnist The Washington Post USA
Company
Emmanuel Ikazoboh Acting Director-General The Nigerian Stock
Nigeria
Exchange Ltd
Michael J. Inacker
Senior Vice-President, Corporate METRO GROUP
Germany
Communications and Public Affairs
Masa Inakage
Dean and Professor, Graduate Keio University
Japan
School of Media Design
Bjarke Ingels Architect Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) Denmark
José Miguel Insulza Secretary-General, Organization of
American States (OAS), Washington
DC
Yoko Ishikura
Professor, Graduate School of Hitotsubashi University Japan
International Corporate Strategy (ICS)
Faisal Islam Economics Editor Channel 4 News United Kingdom
Yoshinori Isozaki Managing Director Kirin Holdings Company Japan
Limited
Kiyohiko Ito Managing Director Keizai Doyukai (Japan Japan
Association of Corporate
Executives)
Koji Iwama
Corporate Vice-President, Corporate Toshiba of Europe Ltd United Kingdom
Representative, EMEA
Daisuke Iwase
Co-Founder and Representative Lifenet Insurance Company Japan
Director
Alexander V. Izosimov President and Chief Executive Officer VimpelCom Ltd Netherlands
Natalia Izosimova Managing Director Foundation for Effective Ukraine
Governance
Michael Izza Chief Executive Officer The Institute of Chartered United Kingdom
Accountants in England and
Wales (ICAEW)
Sir Mohammad Jaafar Chairman and Managing Director The Kuwaiti Danish Dairy Kuwait
Company KCSC
Abdul Malik Al Jaber Chief Executive Officer Zain Jordan Jordan
Vuyo Jack Co-Founder and Chairman Empowerdex South Africa
Shirley Ann Jackson President Rensselaer Polytechnic USA
Institute (RPI)
Paul E. Jacobs Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Qualcomm Inc. USA
Munizae Jahangir
Special Correspondent and Associate Express TV
Pakistan
Executive Producer
Christopher Jahns President and Chief Executive Officer EBS University Germany
Anshu Jain
Member of the Management Board Deutsche Bank AG
United Kingdom
and Head of the Corporate and
Investment Bank
Dipak C. Jain Dean Designate INSEAD France
Hans-Jürgen Jakobs Head of Economic and Financial Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH Germany
Department
Kate James Chief Communications Officer Bill & Melinda Gates
USA
Foundation
Esam Janahi Board Member Vision 3 United Arab Emirates
Rashad Y. Janahi Board Member Vision 3 United Arab Emirates
Amjad Parvez Janjua Executive Director Pakistan State Oil Company Pakistan
Limited (PSO)
Garth C. Japhet Founder and Chief Executive Officer Heartlines South Africa
Livia Járóka Member of the European Parliament European Parliament Belgium
Jeff Jarvis
Blogger, Buzzmachine.com and Graduate School of
USA
Professor
Journalism (CUNY)
Mohamed Husnee Jazeel Chief Executive Officer Dabbagh Group Holding Co. Saudi Arabia
Ltd
Alain Jeannet Editor-in-Chief L'Hebdo Switzerland
Richard A. Jefferson Chief Executive Officer Cambia Australia
Kevin J. Jenkins President and Chief Executive Officer World Vision International United Kingdom
Philip J. Jennings General Secretary UNI Global Union Switzerland
Jeong Kim President, Bell Labs Alcatel-Lucent Bell
USA
Laboratories
Jean-Luc Jezouin
Senior Vice-President and General Kudelski Group
Switzerland
Manager, New Markets Region
Jiang Jianqing Chairman of the Board Industrial and Commercial People's Republic of
Emmanuel Jimenez
Director, Human Development, East
Asia and Pacific Region and Editor,
World Bank Research Observer
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Bank of China Limited
The World Bank
China
USA
Joseph Jimenez Chief Executive Officer Novartis AG Switzerland
Naveen Jindal
Executive Vice-Chairman and Jindal Steel and Power India
Managing Director
Limited

Jeffrey Joerres Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Manpower Inc. USA
Josef Joffe Publisher-Editor Die Zeit Germany
Björn Johansson Chairman Dr Bjorn Johansson
Switzerland
Associates Inc.
Boris Johnson
Mayor of London, United Kingdom
Chris Johnson Executive Vice-President Nestlé SA Switzerland
David Johnson
Executive Vice-President and
Nalco Europe
Netherlands
President, Europe, Africa and Middle
East
Erica L. Johnson
Chief Officer, Customer Network Eskom Holdings Limited South Africa
Business
H. Fisk Johnson Chairman of the Board and Chief S. C. Johnson & Son Inc. USA
Executive Officer
Jace Johnson
Vice President, Government Affairs Adobe Systems
USA
and Public Policy
Kevin Johnson Chief Executive Officer Juniper Networks Inc. USA
Mark Johnson Founder Playing for Change USA
Ray Johnson
Senior Vice-President and Chief Lockheed Martin Corporation USA
Technology Officer
Robert A. Johnson Executive Director The Institute for New USA
Economic Thinking (INET)
Simon Johnson
Ronald A. Kurtz, Professor of
MIT - Sloan School of USA
Entrepreneurship
Management
Tom Johnstone President and Chief Executive Officer AB SKF Sweden
Anthony Jones Journalist Australian Broadcasting Australia
Corporation - ABC
Television
David Jones Global Chief Executive Officer Havas Worldwide USA
Hannah Jones
Vice-President, Sustainable Business Nike Inc.
USA
and Innovation, Government Public
Affairs
Agnes Jongerius President Confederation of Dutch Netherlands
Trade Unions
Conni Jonsson
Chief Executive Officer and Managing EQT Partners AB
Sweden
Partner
Vyomesh Joshi
Executive Vice-President, Imaging Hewlett-Packard Company USA
and Printing Group
Tarun Jotwani
Global Head, Fixed Income and Chief Nomura International Plc United Kingdom
Executive Officer, Europe, Middle
East and Africa
Luciano E. Joublanc Ambassador of Mexico Embassy of Mexico Switzerland
Lisa Jucca Chief Financial Correspondent, Italy Thomson Reuters Italy
Bernhard Jucker
Member of the Executive Committee ABB Ltd
Switzerland
and Head of Power Products
Khaled A. Juffali
Member of the Executive Committee E. A. Juffali and Brothers Saudi Arabia
and Managing Partner
Paul Kagame
President of Rwanda
Banri Kaieda
Minister of Economic and Fiscal
Policy of Japan
Fritz Kaiser Executive Chairman Kaiser Ritter Partner Liechtenstein
Chandra Shekar Kakal Global Head, Enterprise Solutions, Infosys Technologies Ltd India
Infosys
Scott E. Kalb
Chief Investment Officer, Korea
Investment Corporation (KIC),
Republic of Korea
Anatole Kaletsky Editor-at-Large The Times United Kingdom
Siim Kallas
Vice-President and Commissioner,
Transport, European Commission,
Brussels
Paul-Bernhard Kallen Chief Executive Officer Burda Media Germany
Ajay Kalsi Managing Director Phoenix Overseas Ltd India
Baba N. Kalyani Chairman and Managing Director Bharat Forge Ltd India
Abdullah Saleh Kamel Executive President and Chief Dallah Al Baraka Holding Saudi Arabia
Executive Officer
Co.
Tihomir D. Kamenov Founder and Chairman Commercial League
Bulgaria
Healthcare Group
Suzan Salman Kanoo President International Motor Trading Bahrain
Agency WLL
Onkar S. Kanwar Chairman Apollo Tyres Ltd India
John Kao Chairman and Founder Institute for Large Scale USA
Innovation (ILSI)
Scott B. Kapnick Managing Partner Highbridge Capital
USA
Management LLC
Anatoly Karachinsky President and Chief Executive Officer IBS Group Russian Federation
Erdal Karamercan President and Chief Executive Officer Eczacibasi Holding Turkey
Johan Karlström President and Chief Executive Officer Skanska AB Sweden
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Unni Karunakara President Médecins Sans Frontières Switzerland
International
Kasiviswanathan
Shanmugam
Minister for Home Affairs and Minister
for Law of Singapore
Drue Kataoka
Artist, Japan
Piia-Noora Kauppi Managing Director Federation of Finnish Finland
Financial Services
Yoriko Kawaguchi
Member of the House of Councillors,
Japan; Minister for Foreign Affairs of
Japan (2002-2004)
Chris Kearney
Chairman, President and Chief SPX Corporation
USA
Executive Officer
William Keegan Senior Economics Commentator The Observer United Kingdom
Carol Keehan
President and Chief Executive
Officer, Catholic Health Association,
USA
Tom Keene Host Bloomberg Radio &
USA
Television
Tal Keinan Chairman and Chief Executive Officer KCPS & Company Israel
Manish Kejriwal Senior Managing Director Temasek Holdings (Pte) India
Limited
Kairat Kelimbetov Chief Executive Officer Samruk-Kazyna JSC Kazakhstan
Georg Kell
Executive Director, Global Compact
Office, United Nations, New York
Jakob Kellenberger President, International Committee of
the Red Cross (ICRC), Geneva
Edmund F. Kelly Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Liberty Mutual Group USA
Gail Kelly
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Westpac Banking
Australia
Director
Corporation
Jeff Kelly
Chief Executive Officer, BT Global BT Group Plc
United Kingdom
Services
Kevin Kelly Chief Executive Officer Heidrick & Struggles USA
Angelien Kemna Chief Investment Officer APG Asset Management Netherlands
Frederick Kempe President and Chief Executive Officer The Atlantic Council of the USA
United States
Carsten Kengeter Chief Executive Officer UBS Investment Bank United Kingdom
David Kennedy
Director, Institute for Global Law and Harvard Law School
USA
Policy
Kathleen Kennedy Senior Vice-President The Rock Creek Group USA
Townsend
David W. Kenny President Akamai Technologies Inc. USA
Muhtar A. Kent
Chairman of the Board and Chief The Coca-Cola Company USA
Executive Officer
Philip Kent Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Turner Broadcasting System USA
Inc.
Ronald Kent
Executive Vice-President, Head of NYSE Euronext
United Kingdom
International Listings
Neal Keny-Guyer Chief Executive Officer MercyCorps USA
Scott Key President and Chief Operating Officer IHS USA
Sanjeev Khagram
Professor of Public Affairs and
International Studies; Lead Steward
USA
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
University of Washington,
iScale (Innovations for
Scaling Impact)
Mugheer Khamis Al Khaili Director-General , Abu Dhabi
Education Council, United Arab
Emirates
Amr Khaled Chairman of the Board of Trustees Right Start Foundation
International
Fazlun Khalid Founder and Director Islamic Foundation for
Ecology and Environmental
Sciences
Mohamed bin Isa Al
Khalifa
Sheikh Mohammed Bin
Essa Al Khalifa
H.H. Sheikh Al Khalifa
Vice-Chairman
Chief Executive
Bahrain
Telecommunications Co.
(BATELCO)
Bahrain Economic
Development Board
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Bahrain
Bahrain
Adviser to the Prime Minister of
Bahrain
Imran Khan
Chairman, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf,
Pakistan
Mehmood Khan
Chief Executive Officer, Global PepsiCo Inc.
USA
Nutrition Group; Senior Vice-
President and Chief Scientific Officer
Riz Khan Anchor Al Jazeera USA
Ajay Khanna President Jubilant Bhartia Group India
Parag Khanna Director, Global Governance Initiative New America Foundation USA
Tarun Khanna Jorge Paulo Lemann Professor Harvard Business School USA
Jamal Khashoggi General Manager and Editor-in-Chief Al Waleed 24 News Channel Saudi Arabia
Abdulaziz F. Al Khayyal Senior Vice-President, Industrial Saudi Aramco
Saudi Arabia
Relations
Jamil El Khazen Chief Executive Officer Jamyco Holding
Switzerland
Luxembourg SA
Jihad B. Khazen Director Al Hayat United Kingdom
Nand Khemka Chairman SUN Group India
Pankaj Kanaksi Khimji Director Khimji Ramdas LLC Oman
Umesh Khimji Chief Executive Officer Ajit Khimji Group LLC Oman
Habil F. Khorakiwala Chairman Wockhardt Limited India
Sanjay Khosla
Executive Vice-President and
Kraft Foods Inc.
USA
President, Developing Markets
Nagi F. Khouri
Director, Division of Breast Imaging, The Johns Hopkins Avon USA
The Russell H. Morgan Department of
Radiology and Radiological Science
Foundation Breast Center
Samer S. Khoury Executive Vice-President, Operations Consolidated Contractors Greece
Company (CCC)
Eduard Khudainatov President Rosneft Oil Company Russian Federation
Collins Khumalo President Multichoice (Pty) Ltd South Africa
Naina Lal Kidwai Country Head, India HSBC Asia Pacific India
Walter B. Kielholz Chairman of the Board of Directors Swiss Reinsurance
Switzerland
Company Ltd
Jakaya M. Kikwete President of Tanzania
Nancy Killefer Senior Director and Office Manager McKinsey & Company USA
Kim Dong Kwan Managing Director Hanwha Group Republic of Korea
Kim Hyun-Chung President and Chief Executive Officer Hanwha Engineering & Republic of Korea
Construction Corporation
Kim Jong-Hoon
Minister for Trade of the Republic of
Korea
Kim Sam-Whan Very Reverend Myungsung Presbyterian
Church
Republic of Korea
Kim Sang-Hyup
Secretary to the President of the
Republic of Korea for Green Growth
and Environment, Office of the
President, Republic of Korea
Kim Seung Youn Chairman Hanwha Group Republic of Korea
David Kim Younghoon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Daesung Group Republic of Korea
Robert M. Kimmitt Senior International Counsel Wilmer Hale USA
Takeshi Kimura President Mitsubishi Chemical Europe Germany
GMBH
Fred Kindle Partner Clayton, Dubilier & Rice LLP United Kingdom
David King Executive Director Smith School of Enterprise United Kingdom
and the Environment (SSEE)
Raymond King Chief Executive Officer BUPA United Kingdom
Steve King Chief Executive Officer Worldwide ZenithOptimedia United Kingdom
Wallace King Chief Executive Officer Leighton Holdings Ltd Australia
Lise Kingo
Executive Vice-President, Corporate Novo Nordisk A/S
Denmark
Relations
Ron Kirk
US Trade Representative
David Kirkpatrick Technology Columnist The Daily Beast USA
Victoria Kisyombe Chief Executive Officer and Founder Sero Lease and Finance Tanzania
(Selfina)
Shinichi Kitajima
Ambassador and Permanent
Permanent Mission of Japan Switzerland
Representative of Japan
Mari Kiviniemi
Prime Minister of Finland
Akira Kiyota Chairman Daiwa Securities Group Inc. Japan
Larry Klane Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Korea Exchange Bank Republic of Korea
Bruce Klein
Senior Vice-President, US Public Cisco
USA
Sector
Klaus Kleinfeld Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Alcoa Inc. USA
Mark Kleinman City Editor Sky News - BSkyB United Kingdom
Andrzej Klesyk Chief Executive Officer PZU SA Poland
Hans Klingenberg Ambassador of Denmark Embassy of Denmark Switzerland
Jürgen Kluge Chairman of the Managing Board Franz Haniel & Cie GmbH Germany
Steffen Klusmann Editor-in-Chief The Financial Times
Germany
Deutschland
Hermann-Josef Knipper Deputy Editor-in-Chief Handelsblatt Germany
Carsten Knop Senior Business Editor Frankfurter Allgemeine Germany
Zeitung
Sir Nigel Knowles Managing Partner DLA Piper UK LLP United Kingdom
Eizo Kobayashi
Chairman and Representative Itochu Corporation
Japan
Director
Yoshimitsu Kobayashi President and Chief Executive Officer Mitsubishi Chemical
Japan
Holdings Corporation
Aaron Koblin
Artist, USA
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Silvana Koch-Mehrin Vice-President, European Parliament,
Brussels
Caio Koch-Weser
Vice-Chairman, Deutsche Bank Deutsche Bank AG
United Kingdom
Group
Chanda Kochhar
Managing Director and Chief
ICICI Bank Ltd
India
Executive Officer
Nancy Koehn
James E. Robison Professor of Harvard Business School USA
Business Administration
Sergey A. Kogogin Director-General Kamaz Inc. Russian Federation
Annie Koh
Associate Professor of Finance and Singapore Management Singapore
Dean, Office of Executive and
Professional Education
University
Manuel Kohnstamm Managing Director, Public Policy and Liberty Global Europe BV Netherlands
Communications
Yorihiko Kojima Chairman of the Board Mitsubishi Corporation Japan
Ali Kolaghassi Vice-President Saudi Oger Ltd Saudi Arabia
Eivind Drachmann Kolding Partner and Chief Executive Officer, A.P. Møller-Maersk AS Denmark
Container Business
Kathy Koll Matsui Co-Head, Asia Investment Research Goldman Sachs Japan Co. Japan
Ltd
Steve Koltes Managing Partner CVC Capital Partners Luxembourg
(Luxembourg) Sàrl
Bronislaw Komorowski President of Poland
Madhu Koneru Group Executive Director Trimex International FZE United Arab Emirates
Dmitry Konov President Sibur LLC Russian Federation
Koo Jayoung President and Chief Executive Officer SK Energy Republic of Korea
Nathalie Kosciusko-
Morizet
Minister of Ecology, Sustainable
Development, Transports and
Housing of France
Mikko Kosonen President SITRA (Finnish Innovation Finland
Fund)
Johann O. Koss President and Chief Executive Officer Right To Play International Canada
Andrei L. Kostin Chairman and Chief Executive Officer JSC VTB Bank Russian Federation
Wojciech J. Kostrzewa President and Chief Executive Officer ITI Corporation Sp.zo.o. Poland
Uday S. Kotak
Vice-Chairman and Managing Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd India
Director
Brij Kothari Director PlanetRead India
Margery Kraus President and Chief Executive Officer APCO Worldwide Inc. USA
Lawrence M. Krauss Professor, School of Earth and Space Arizona State University USA
Exploration
Henry R. Kravis Founding Partner Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & USA
Co.
Dariusz Jacek Krawiec President and Chief Executive Officer PKN ORLEN SA Poland
John Krenicki Jr
Vice-Chairman, GE, and Chairman GE Energy
USA
and Chief Executive Officer
Nicholas D. Kristof Columnist The New York Times USA
Neelie Kroes
Vice-President and Commissioner for
the Digital Agenda, European
Commission, Brussels
Patrick Kron Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Alstom France
Fred Krupp President Environmental Defense USA
Fund
André Kudelski
Chairman of the Board and Chief Kudelski Group
Switzerland
Aleksey Kudrin
Executive Officer
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of
Finance of the Russian Federation
Michael Kuhndt Head UNEP/Wuppertal Institute
Collaborating Centre on
Sustainable Consumption
and Production
Germany
Peter Kukielski Group Management Board Member ArcelorMittal United Kingdom
Timur Kulibayev Deputy Chairman of the Board Samruk-Kazyna JSC Kazakhstan
Ellen Kullman
Chair of the Board and Chief
DuPont
USA
Executive Officer
Manu Kumar
Project Manager, Economic
D.E. Shaw & Co. L.P. USA
Discretionary
Howard Kunreuther James G. Dinan Professor; Professor
of Decision Sciences and Public
Policy
The Wharton School,
University of Pennsylvania
USA
Rolf Kuntz
Vera Kurochkina
Haruhiko Kuroda
Editorialist and Special
Correspondent
Deputy Chief Executive Officer and
Member of the Board of Directors
President, Asian Development Bank,
Manila
O Estado de São Paulo
RUSAL
Brazil
Russian Federation
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Kiyoshi Kurokawa Professor National Graduate Institute Japan
for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
Tapio Kuula President and Chief Executive Officer Fortum Corporation Finland
Nabil R. Kuzbari President and Chief Executive Officer Vimpex Handels GmbH Austria
Maja Kuzmanovic President FoAM Belgium
Stanislav Kuznetsov Deputy Chairman of the Board Sberbank Russian Federation
Andrey R. Kuzyaev President Lukoil Overseas Holding Ltd Russian Federation
Kwak Seung-Jun
Chairman, Presidential Council for
Future and Vision, Republic of Korea
Fawzi Kyriakos-Saad Chief Executive Officer, Europe, Credit Suisse AG
United Kingdom
Middle East and Africa (EMEA) and
Member of the Executive Board
Rachel Kyte Vice-President International Finance USA
Corporation (IFC)
Carlos Labarthe Costas Executive President Banco Compartamos S.A., Mexico
Institucion de Banca Multiple
Huguette Labelle Chair Transparency International Germany
María Claudia Lacouture President Proexport Colombia Colombia
Francine Lacqua
Anchor 'On the Move' and Senior Bloomberg Television United Kingdom
Correspondent
Peter Lacy
Managing Director, Sustainability Accenture
United Kingdom
Services, EMEA and Latin America
Christine Lagarde
Minister of Economy, Finance and
Industry of France; Member of the
Foundation Board of the World
Economic Forum
Samir Lahoud Chairman Lahoud Engineering Lebanon
Sam Laidlaw Chief Executive Officer Centrica Plc United Kingdom
Charles D. Lake II Chairman and Representative Aflac Japan Japan
Siddhartha Lal
Managing Director and Chief
Eicher Motors Limited India
Executive Officer
Charlotte Lambkin Group Communications Director BAE Systems Plc United Kingdom
Christina Lampe-Önnerud Founder and Chief Executive Officer Boston-Power Inc. USA
Pascal Lamy
Director-General, World Trade
Organization (WTO), Geneva
Ray Lane Chairman, Board of Directors Hewlett-Packard Company USA
Laura Lang Chief Executive Officer Digitas Inc. USA
Gernot A. Langes- Chairman D. Swarovski KG Austria
Swarovski
Guy Louis Lansdown Executive Vice-President, Discovery Newmont Mining
USA
and Development
Corporation
Felipe Larraín Bascuñán Minister of Finance of Chile
Thomas Larsen Editor and Political Commentator Berlingske Tidende AS Denmark
Keith Larson
Vice-President, Intel Capital and Intel Corporation
USA
Managing Director
Juan Mario Laserna Senator, Colombia
Adam Lashinsky Senior Editor-at-Large Fortune Magazine USA
Alex Laskey President OPOWER USA
Vanessa Lau
Group Chief Financial Officer, Alcoa Alcoa Inc.
USA
Global Rolled Products
Paul A. Laudicina
Chairman of the Board and Managing A.T. Kearney Inc.
USA
Officer
Ilja Laurs Chief Executive Officer GetJar USA
Anne Lauvergeon Chief Executive Officer Areva France
Sergey V. Lavrov
Minister of Foreign Affairs of the
Russian Federation
Gerald Lawless Executive Chairman Jumeirah Group United Arab Emirates
Robert Z. Lawrence Albert L. Williams Professor of Trade Harvard Kennedy School USA
and Investment
Matthew Layton
Global Head, Corporate Practice and Clifford Chance LLP
United Kingdom
Partner
Hani Lazkani Head, Investments Olayan Europe Ltd United Kingdom
Loïc Le Meur Founder and Chief Executive Officer Seesmic USA
Susan Lea
Co-Director, Institute for Vaccine University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Design, Oxford Martin School
Sir Terry Leahy Chief Executive Tesco Plc United Kingdom
Jim Leape Director-General WWF - World Wide Fund for Switzerland
Nature
Peter Leav Senior Vice-President, Global Sales NCR Corporation USA
Edith Lederer Chief Correspondent, United Nations The Associated Press (AP) USA
Bessie Lee Chief Executive Officer GroupM China People's Republic of
China
Ellana Lee Managing Editor, Asia Pacific CNN International Hong Kong SAR
Lee Eunkyung
Vice-President, Strategic Relation
Officer
SK Holdings
Republic of Korea
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
Lee Kai-Fu Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Innovation Works People's Republic of
China
Lee Yong-Shin Chief Risk Officer Korea Investment
Republic of Korea
Corporation (KIC)
Jim Leech President and Chief Executive Officer Ontario Teachers' Pension Canada
Plan
Fred van Leeuwen General Secretary Education International Belgium
Manfredi Lefebvre d'Ovidio Deputy Chairman, European Cruise Silversea Cruises Group Monaco
di Balsorano
Council, and Chairman
Gottfried Leibbrandt Head of Marketing SWIFT SCRL Belgium
Jon Leibowitz
Chairman, Federal Trade
Commission, USA
Achankeng Leke Partner McKinsey & Company South Africa
Frédéric Lemoine Chairman of the Executive Board Wendel France
François J. Lenglet Editorial Director La Tribune France
Steve J. Lennon
Managing Director, Corporate Eskom Holdings Limited South Africa
Services Division
Sergio Leo Columnist, Senior Reporter Valor Econômico Brazil
Mark Leonard Director European Council on United Kingdom
Foreign Relations (ECFR)
Stefano Lepri International Economic Editor La Stampa Italy
Josh Lerner
Jacob H. Schiff Professor of
Harvard Business School USA
Investment Banking
Monique F. Leroux Chair of the Board, President and Desjardins Group
Canada
Chief Executive Officer
Aharon Leshno-Yaar Ambassador and Permanent
Representative of Israel to the United
Nations, Geneva
Rich Lesser Chairman, North and South America The Boston Consulting
Group
USA
Yves Leterme
Doris Leuthard
Prime Minister of Belgium
Federal Councillor of Environment,
Transport, Energy and
Communications of the Swiss
Confederation
Lord Levene Chairman Lloyd's United Kingdom
Richard C. Levin President Yale University USA
Alison Levine Mountaineer and President DareDevil Strategies USA
Zohar Levkovitz Chief Executive Officer Amobee USA
Maurice Lévy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Publicis Groupe SA France
Freda Lewis-Hall
Executive Vice President, Chief
Medical Officer
Pfizer Inc.
Ursula von der Leyen Federal Minister of Labour and Social
Affairs of Germany
Li Daokui Director Center for China in the
People's Republic of
World Economy (CCWE) China
Ping Li Partner Accel Partners USA
Jason Li Yat-Sen Director The George Institute for Australia
Global Health
Bernard Liautaud General Partner Balderton Capital United Kingdom
Zachary Lieberman Artist and Computer Programmer thesystemis USA
Michael Liebreich Chief Executive Bloomberg New Energy United Kingdom
Finance
Michel M. Liès Chairman, Global Partnerships Swiss Reinsurance
Switzerland
Company Ltd
Ernst Ligteringen Chief Executive Global Reporting Initiative
(GRI)
Netherlands
Andrew Likierman Dean London Business School United Kingdom
Lin Yu Chief Executive Officer NetQin Mobile Inc. People's Republic of
China
Julio Linares Chief Operating Officer Telefonica SA Spain
Donald Lindsay
President and Chief Executive Officer
USA
It is the policy of the World Economic Forum to safeguard the privacy of its Members and participants by preventing any misuse of
personal information provided to us for the purpose of facilitating contact and dialogue in furtherance of the Forum’s mission.
• All participants in any World Economic Forum activity agree to treat any information related to the list of participants and
participant contact information as strictly confidential and to use it solely to facilitate personal communication among
participants of World Economic Forum activities.
• They agree that this information shall not be used for any other purpose, including solicitation for commercial endeavours.
In case of violation of this rule, the World Economic Forum reserves the right to take any action it deems appropriate and
necessary to protect the nature and the confidentiality of its activities.
World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011046.txt,"in the exact 10:1 proportion required throughout. Whatever was contributed to pay
by maintenance recovery, on top of depreciation recovery, would have to hold the
same ratio in order for pay to cover both. Experience shows this as unlikely in any
case, let alone all cases. The boss and her secretary probably couldn’t hold

maintenance consumption to that ratio if they tried.

Another strong argument against the hypothesis of prior claims on pay is lack of a
source. The claimant would be whoever other than the worker had paid for the
maintenance consumption and needed to be made whole. Thus the employing firm
would hold a valid claim if it had provided the maintenance consumption in order to
enable the work. That would put the firm in the position of a farmer who must feed
the livestock and must earn enough profit to recoup the cost. We went through this
in the parable of Phil and Bill. But the employer firm does not advance the cost
because it has no motive to do so. It knows that the worker will pay it anyhow if
means allow. Where means don’t allow, as in retirement without adequate savings,
the worker looks to transfer payments from society generally rather than from the

firm alone.

Now comes the evidence of age-wage profiles. This evidence is the substance behind
the parable of the boss and her secretary. The evidence is apt. Wage generally
means hourly pay, while “earnings” means yearly pay. Wage-earnings profiles show
arise with age, but peaking and reversing as workers reach their fifties or so. The
reason is that they tend to work fewer hours. I consider pay per hour a better
measure of human capital than pay per year. If someone is worth $30 per hour half
time, my impression is that she would be worth $30 per hour full time. If she prefers
to stay home, her leisure must give her that much psychic pay instead. Psychic pay

cuts just as much ice with me.

My boss and secretary were cases preferring to work full time. Age-wage profiles
bear out the scenario | imagined for them. They illustrate the logical certainty that

human depreciation is expected to be recovered in pay, and support the

Chapter 6: Parallels with the Firm 2/4/16 12

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011046
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020225.txt,"73

Appelbaum was also well connected in this culture. He was the North American representative
for Wikileaks before he moved to Berlin in 2013. He also managed Wikileaks’ cyber security
when it released classified documents in Iceland in 2010. He was so well-regarded among
hacktavists that Assange chose him as his keynote speaker replacement at the “Hackers of the
Planet Earth” (HOPE) convention in New York City. Assange also sung his praises, telling
Rolling Stone “Jake [Appelbaum] has been a tireless promoter behind the scenes of our cause.”
For its part, Ro//ing Stone entitled its profile of Appelbaum, “Meet the most dangerous man on
the Internet.” The reason that Assange needed a replacement for this particular event was that he
feared he would be arrested if he came to New York because he had released the Manning files on
Wikileaks.

In Berlin, Appelbaum went to extreme lengths to protect himself from American surveillance.
For example, when George Packer interviewed him for the New Yorker, in 2014, he insisted on
meeting with Packer naked in a sauna so he could be sure Packer did not have a recording device
(other than his notebook.) Appelbaum stated repeatedly in other interviews that he was being
spied upon by America. While his claims may have sounded paranoid to his interviewers, as a
character in Joseph Heller’s Catch 22 famously said, “Just because you are paranoid doesn’t mean
that you are not being followed.” In any event, Appelbaum acted to defeat the perceived
surveillance.

Runa Sandvik was another principal core developers in the TOR project in 2012. A Norwegian
national in her mid-twenties, she wrote in 2012 a well-followed blog for Forbes on Internet
privacy in which she identified herself as a privacy and security researcher working at the
intersection of technology, law and policy. As a close associate of Appelbaum’s, she worked
tirelessly to extend TOR’s cloak of anonymity against the surveillance of the NSA and other
would-be intruders of privacy. Appelbaum and Sandvik shared another distinction. They both
came in contact with Snowden before he went public and while he was still working for the NSA
in Hawaii.

Snowden was in 2012 a major advocate of TOR software. He made no secret of his concerns
about it electronic interceptions. He even wore to work a jacket with a parody of the NSA
insignia, which, instead of merely depicting the NSA eagle, show the eagle clutching AT&T
phone lines. He had also become a member of the Electronic Freedom Foundation, the digital
rights organization that was helping finance TOR. His efforts on behalf of TOR were not limited
to symbolic gestures. Through his work as a system administrator for Dell, he had found
documents revealing NSA efforts to defeat TOR’s ability to camouflage its user’s identity on the
Internet. Though not yet successful, he found that the NSA was attempting to build back-door
entry ways into TOR software. He also knew that the NSA was becoming increasingly hostile
to the spread of TOR software. One of the NSA documents that he illicitly downloaded was
entitled “TOR Stinks.” It described the NSA’s enormous but not fully successful efforts to
penetrate TOR servers. In addition, he downloaded NSA documents describing programs begun
in 2012 that aimed at searching the Internet for the cyber-signatures of foreign parties suspected
of hacking into US government systems. So he knew that the NSA considered the TOR
movement an enemy.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020225
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014917.txt,"Table 19: Pandora estimate summary Chart 13: Listening hours and active users trends are essentially flat.
1Q17 2017 2017 2018 12%

Revenue

BofAML est. $319 $397 $1,629 $2,036 10%

Growth Y/Y% 18% 25%

Street $318 $390 $1,621 $2,050 8%

BofAML vs. Street Above Above Above Below 6%

EBITDA

BofAML est. -$73 $1 -$17 $25 4%

Street -$73 -$16 -$38 $79

BofAML vs. Street In-line Above Above Below 2%

EPS 0%

corAM est. ce ona a ae oq, {1018 2015 3015 4015 1016 Q16 4Q16 1017E2017E 3Q17E4Q17E

BofAML vs. Street Below Above Above Below

AY
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research estimates, Bloomberg 7h

eee | istening Hours Y/Y Growth === Active Listners Y/Y Growth

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research estimates, company report

Bankof America

Merrill Lynch Internet/e-Commerce | 06 April2017 31

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014917
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021383.txt,"13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

research. Journal of Counseling
& Development 1990;68:417-22.

Cattan M, White M. Developing
evidence based health promotion

for older people: A systematic 20.

review and survey of health
promotion interventions targeting
social isolation and loneliness
among older people. Internet
Journal of Health Promotion
1998:13.

Findlay RA. Interventions to 21.

reduce social isolation among
older people: Where is the
evidence? Ageing & Society
2003;23(5):647-58.

Perese EF, Wolf M. Combating
loneliness among persons with
severe mental illness: Social
network interventions’
characteristics, effectiveness, and
applicability. Issues in Mental
Health Nursing 2005;26:591-
609.

Cattan M, White M, Bond J,
Learmouth A. Preventing social
isolation and loneliness among
older people: A systematic
review of health promotion
interventions. Ageing & Society
2005;25:41-67.

Kuhn TS. The Structure of
Scientific Revolutions. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press,
1962.

Chambless DL, Hollon SD.
Defining empirically supported
therapies. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology
1998;66:7-18.

Fried LP, Carlson MC, Freedman
M, et al. A social model for
health promotion for an aging

Page |137

population: Initial evidence on
the Experience Corps model.
Journal of Urban Health
2004;81(1):64-78.

Glass TA, Freedman M, Carlson
MC, et al. Experience Corps:
Design of an intergenerational
program to boost social capital
and promote the health of an
aging society. Journal of Urban
Health 2004;81(1):94-105.

Rowe JW, Kahn R. Experience
Corps: Commentary. Journal of
Urban Health 2004;81(1):61-3.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021383
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031309.txt,"DARREN K. INDYKE
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, New York 10022

Ee ee eee ee ee ee ee ee ee i ee ee ee i ee ie ee
BS 2k DIC 2k DIS 3g 24S Is 2k 2s 2 Os ie 2k

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.

Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - € 2016 Darren K.

Indyke, PLLC @ All rights reserved.

Be ee ee i eee ee ee ee ee ee Oe ee i ee i ee ee i ae
BS 2s 2S 2 2s 2s 2Ie Fis 2c 2s oe fs 2k 2k 2c

Begin forwarded message:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031309
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023863.txt,"How to Teach the Twelve Cognitive Processes 1917

How do we teach prediction when there is no script and there are
no seemingly relevant prior cases? In some sense we can’t. We can teach
people how to go about trying to make predictions. This is actually what
science is about. Scientists create theories that make predictions, which
they then try to verify with evidence. This process—hypotheses verified
by evidence—can be taught in the sense that it is a way of thinking that
can be practiced in various venues. It is reasonable to start teaching chil-
dren to think in this way about the world around them. As for adults,
teaching scientific reasoning in the context of corporate training is
probably a less than optimal place to start. People in corporations need
to be able to reason from evidence and to understand what data would
confirm or deny the value of actions they have taken for the benefit of
the company. This, of course, is scientific reasoning. But, unfortunately,
the people who go into the business world tend to have never practiced
scientific reasoning in their educational careers because they weren’t
interested in science. But they must be interested in predicting well in
order to succeed in business.

HOW TO TEACH MODELING

Building a model of a process is very difficult for a child to do and not
so easy for an adult to do either. When you teach computer science,
you learn this quickly enough. Computer programs are models of pro-
cesses. People try to write computer programs by creating diagrams
that model what happens first and then what happens next, and so
on. These models are almost never right the first time.

Programmers learn to debug their programs, which means they
continue to try to get their model to be accurate. But most people
cannot do this very easily, and it is a very important skill. Knowing
how to raise money is important if one wants to start a business, for
example. The money-raising process can be understood, but one has
to examine it and go through it.

This is just as true of ordering in a restaurant. Children may seem
to know about ordering in a restaurant, but they may not understand
money or service or having a job exactly and thus may have an er-
roneous model of the process. Why does the waitress bring food, is a
complex question for a 5-year-old, but also an important one. Build-
ing models of how and why things work as they do, is significant for
children to learn to do.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023863
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020923.txt,"Effective Interest Rates: While USA Debt Has Risen,

Net Interest Payments Have Fallen

USA Net Federal Debt Outstanding & Net Interest Payments, 1980 — 2010

BELO ne men me co — er ee we eet — ne cee ct tet — ie ee ct Ht ede lt at ee ts Ut es od i i! — at $500
mas Net Debt Outstanding

—Net Interest Payments

$8,000 ---- $400
mo mo
& &
2 2
S $6,000 $300 =
< £
g a
3)
5 rt
9 o
& $4,000 $200 §
Qa £
o o
za z

$2,000 $100

$0 $0

1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

KP Source: White House Office of Management and Budget.
(@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 163

Effective Interest Rates: Hypothetical Exercise — If USA 2009 Cost of Debt
Was Paid at 30-Year Average Interest Rate Level of 6% vs. Current 2%,
Annual Interest Cost Would Rise 3x to $566 Billion from $196 Billion

USA Actual & Hypothetical Net Interest Payments’, 1980 — 2010

BB me me re ew oe ws re ee nm rt a — SR RS RE re RS — ARE ro SSA ra nS
— -Hypothetical Net Interest Payments, Assuming 4
30-Year Average Effective Interest Rate of 6.25% /
S500 sa et — as a an — ER SS / -
Actual Net Interest Payments /
Would have
BAO m-mmem- oF been $3708
1 higher

Net Interest Payments ($B)

$0 r T T T 1
1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

Note: * Hypothetical net interest payments calculation assumes all other variables (such as GDP, revenue, spending, debt
KP levels, etc.) are held constant. Source: White House Office of Management and Budget.
(@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 164

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020923
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012229.txt,"OS

cr

10

11

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

oe

= =
ie Es Ba EF

MP:

door, but it was open so | didn't really pay attention. But | know it was a doorway
going up.

Okay. So new you're in that kitchen area. Right?

Um hm.

The three of you?

Yes.

Where did you park the car?

in his little driveway area.

So you're in the kitchen area. What happens next?

We were waiting there. We were talking, just about how cool the house was. I’m
like ch my gosh, I’ve never been in a house like this. And then the lady and the
man came in, Jeff. I'm pretty sure...like 90% positive. And he walked in, he was

like in a t-shirt and pants, not pants but you know, like maybe tike kind of dressy.

Do you know what | mean?

Um him.

GER anc then he’s like okay,
well, then follow my, | don’t remember the lady's name but she’s, he said follow
her (the name) upstairs. So she’s like, come on oe and then we walked

upstairs and | thought......

Page 19 of 43

05135

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012229
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030771.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 12/11/2017 7:39:17 PM
To: Michae! Wo! tt iii
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High
you and i are old news? :).

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Michael Wolf (ie wrote:
And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's
sake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--
whacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur
Sulzberger.

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
Strange time I have two more friends up to bat

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM Michael Wolff SG wrote:

Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have
a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised
and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not
going to end until Trump goes down.

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

https://www.washinetontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030771
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011720.txt,"When I got back, we immediately met with Rabin and agreed on the need to
launch a formal investigation. Rabin then asked me to brief the “editors club”, a
group of about 15 media figures that operated on a gentleman’s agreement that
there would be no publicity or leaks. He believed we should not make public the
fact that I and other generals were there when the accident occurred. At this
stage, we still hoped to hide the purpose of the exercise if possible, something
Rabin knew would be harder if it was known the top military leadership had
observed the exercise. When I briefed the editors’ club, I did tell them in
confidence that I’d been there. Though not specifying the reason for the
exercise, I told them it was for a major operation. The time-honored
understanding was that this information would go no further. But it did,
presumably at first because of leaks by Israeli journalists, then in a series of
detailed reports in the foreign press. Even more frustrating on a personal level,
some of the Israeli reports insinuated that far from giving the editors the full
story of who had been at the Negev exercise, that I’d tried to hide my presence
in order to protect my reputation or shirk responsibility.

Two official inquiries followed: the one we’d agreed with Rabin and a
standard army legal investigation. They found the cause of the tragedy to be a
mix of fatigue after some of the soldiers had spent nearly 48 hours awake,
pressure, confusion and negligence. Astonishingly, it turned out the codeword
for the mock-firing of the missiles in the first stage of the exercise was the same
as for the live missiles. Formal charges were brought against two Sayeret
Matkal officers, and reprimands issued to Amiram Levin and Uri Saguy. I was
also subject to criticism because, due to the unique complexity of the plan, I’d
put Amiram and senior officers within Sayeret Matkal in charge of different
aspects of the preparations. This was viewed as possibly reducing the clarity
over who was ultimately responsible for each aspect of the planning. Neither I,
nor of course Rabin, had played a direct role in what went wrong in the exercise
itself. To the extent I’d been involved, it was to make sure the medical teams
were helicoptered in, and that the injured soldiers were cared for and evacuated
as soon as possible. But politically, the tragedy at Tze’elim would dramatically
resurface for both me and Rabin several years later — after I’d left the military
and was on the verge of joining his government.

I was getting to know Yitzhak much better. The Defense Minister’s office in
the kirva was just down the hall from mine. Almost without fail on Friday
afternoons, he’d ask me in to chat before going home. We would sit around a
low table in the corner of the room, each of us sipping coffee, or sometimes
beer, and Rabin invariably puffing on a cigarette. He never raised questions of

249
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011720
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028577.txt,"On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:43 PM Weingarten, Reid FY wrote:

So knew what your answer was going to be
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: J

Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:39 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re: Re:

kathy would tacke me if i were to save you :)

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:30 PM Weingarten, Reid i ___,. wrote:

Just want to make sure if brad and reid were in a burning building and you could save only ONE.......c:cceccseeeseeeeeees

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:21 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re: Re:

of course not. ! I've been called many things in the press recently -- retarded - is not one of them

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:14 PM Weingarten, Reid SF wrote:

Very small fucking world....obviously don’t mention my role with brad till we both think it useful

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gqmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:12 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re: Re:

brad represent softbank ,not rajeev , but did speak to him yesterday, re DB

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 6:32 PM Weingarten, Reid F —ts—:CiCS wrote:

Cal me if you get a chance... x

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028577
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030338.txt,"This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please
notify the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately. Do not disclose the contents to another person.
You may not use the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way. Guardian News & Media Limited is not
liable for any computer viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this e-mail. You should employ virus
checking software.

Guardian News & Media Limited is a member of Guardian Media Group plc. Registered Office: PO Box 68164, Kings
Place, 90 York Way, London, N1P 2AP. Registered in England Number 908396

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030338
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032716.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Attachments: 
Lawrence Krauss 
1/15/2018 3:01:19 AM 
jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Re: no chile 
image002.png 
Importance: High 
Not sure I understood that, but thanks Jeffrey for everything. Talk tomorrow. 
On Jan 14, 2018, at 7:57 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
He publicly shed and defend ed his told in publishing trash. Right to know I think you should distinguish 
yourself from trump 
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:52 PM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Of course 
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:36 PM Lawrence Krauss wrote: 
so.. what do you think of the letter on the whole? This is very scary, but I see that they keep contacting 
students, postdocs etc, and are 
not letting up.. I really need your feedback. 
will talk tomorrow.. on plane now. 
On Jan 14, 2018, at 3:33 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
why? 
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Lawrence Krauss 
wrote: 
have cancelled my flight to chile.. did so while on way to jfk and found a flight to portland at the same time.. 
will be home tonight.. can we talk tomorrow? 
Lawrence M. Krauss 
Director, The Origins Project at ASU 
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative 
Foundation Professor 
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department 
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 
Research Offie: Assistan 
Origins Office 
origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu 
-Origins Project 10 Year Celebration 
Be a part of something 10 years in the making! 
April 5-9th 2018 — 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032716 
<image002.png> 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
Lawrence M. Krauss 
Director, The Origins Project at ASU 
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative 
Foundation Professor 
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department 
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 
Research Office: 480.965.6378 I Assistant 
Origins Office 
origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu 
-Origins Project 10 Year Celebration 
Be a part of something 10 years in the making! 
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032717 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
Lawrence M. Krauss 
Director, The Origins Project at ASU 
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative 
Foundation Professor 
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department 
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 
Research Office: 480.965.6378 I Assistant 
Origins Office 
origins.asu.edu I twitter.com/Ikraussl I krauss.faculty.isu.edu 
Origins Project 10 Year Celebration 
Be a part of something 10 years in the making! 
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info 
Mal Opziigitns 
Arizona State University 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032718 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029669.txt,"Keating says: ""It's because president Mitterrand and the French wanted it. They weren't
ready to sit beside the German unified state without some friends.""

So the eurozone was flawed from the outset, a structure awaiting internal assault: ""The
problem is we have a single currency without a political union and without a fiscal union.""

The second blunder was the 1990s expansion of NATO to the Russian border. For
Keating, this was recklessness for which the world may yet pay.

""Sensible policy would have included a place for Russia in the new world order,"" he says.
""But that didn't happen. So Russian liberals were pushed to one side by Russian
nationalists. In a sense the US has created Vladimir Putin.""

Who is responsible? He points the finger at Bill Clinton.

On the 2008 financial crisis, he says former US Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan
must bear ""a fair amount of responsibility”.

“Greenspan is someone | know and like,"" Keating says. ""But if you are so naive to believe
that institutions with a balance sheet with assets geared at 45 to one is not an accident
waiting to happen then you don't deserve to be chairman of the Federal Reserve.""

He praises Obama for seeking a return to the ""liberal internationalism"" that, in Keating's
view, made the US great in the post-World War Il age. This is the US he loves but it is still
in retreat.

Asked about the nature of leadership, Keating reveals what lies within his heart: ""| believe
there is a poetic strand to life that doesn't exist in an economics textbook.

“This is not to say that rationalism isn't important and good. It is. But left to itself without
the guidance of higher meaning and a higher concept, rationalism can be mean and
incomplete. | say if you simply live on rational policy and briefing notes you are not
sufficiently informed.

""You need a higher calling or some inner system of belief - here | mention Kant and the
inner command that tells you what is true, what is right, what is good. The inner
command must be the divining construct in what you do.

""Music has always been a large part of what makes me tick. You listen to a great work. .
. you hear the majesty of these works and your head and soul gets caught up in them.
When that happens you are in for bigger things and you will strike out to be better.

""When | was listening to music | would always have the pad out to write the ideas down.""

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/paul-keating-explains-as-never-
before/story-e6frg74x-1226173493029

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029669
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032166.txt,"needs corrrection.. Netanyahu is not a coward.
I've seen him as a young special forces

officer ,under my command, facing fire directly and
taking risks to his life. A very courageous soldier.
That will never change. cheap words serve little
purpose .The same applies to President Obama
and Secretary Kerry. they are not enemies of
Israel. they are Good Friends. Kerry has exhibited
decades long support for Israel. Since he became
secretary of State he has invested his time
energy and prestige trying to help Israel and the
Palestinians to bridge disputes and reach a
breakthrough. it was a noble effort which

should justify thanks rather than accustations. We
are of course concerned by the lack of outcome of
the P5+1 negotiations with Iran and we think that
the chemical weapons removal from Syria could
have been handled differently But President
Obama strengthens the legacy of Presidential
support for Israel.. Israel has a vital interest in
resuming the healthy trust, and mutual respect
that existed until recently.

. | believe that the most profound internal debate
inside Israel today is in regard to the relationship

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032166
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011734.txt,"It was still my responsibility to ensure that Gaza-Jericho was implemented,
and that the initial withdrawals and redeployments went ahead smoothly. And
they did. But I also was soon playing a part in a renewed effort by Rabin to use
the momentum of Oslo to achieve peace agreements with our other Arab
neighbors: the Syrians, although he knew that would be tough, and first the
Jordanians. I would always have had some role, by virtue of the need for a chief
of staff to weigh in on security issues. But as Yitzhak had done from the start,
he involved me and others in his inner political circle in wider discussions on
the whole range of negotiating issues. Especially after Oslo, he seemed
determined to keep Peres’s role to an absolute minimum.

No peace talks are ever completely straightforward, but the process with
Jordan was very close to that. The main issues on the Jordanian side involved
ensuring a proper share of scarce water supplies; and dealing with Israel’s de
facto control of a fairly large area near the southern end of our border. A
number of kibbutzim and moshavim were farming the land there. But under the
post-1948 armistice, it had been allocated to Jordan. Israel’s priorities were to
put in place a fully open relationship of peace and cooperation, and to get
assurances Jordan would not allow its territory to be used by Palestinian groups
to launch terror attacks.

I was struck by how much more easily compromises can be found if you
truly trust the party on the other side. From my earlier meeting with Hussein in
England, before the Gulf War, I’d been impressed by the king’s thoughtful and
measured, yet warm and open, demeanor. That, in itself, inspired trust. But ever
since 1967, even in times of high tension, Israel and Jordan had kept open secret
lines of communication, and both sides had generally demonstrated a shared
desire, and ability, to steer clear of conflict. The main trade-off in the search for
a formal peace turned out to be not too difficult. We agreed to ensure water
provision, and to accept Jordanian sovereignty over the 1949 armistice area, in
return for which the king allowed the Israelis who had been working the land to
stay in place as lessees. On the final Wednesday of October 1994, near our
border crossing in the Arava desert, I watched as Rabin, King Hussein, and
President Clinton formally seal the full “Treaty of Peace Between the State of
Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.”

263
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011734
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028563.txt,"Cite as: 586 U.S. (2019) 5

BREYER, J., dissenting

as it appeared more than 75 years ago in Sutherland’s
book on statutory construction, says that “when a statute
refers to a general subject, the statute adopts the law on
that subject as it exists whenever a question under the
statute arises.” Ante, at 9 (citing 2 J. Sutherland, Statu-
tory Construction §§5207-5208 (8d ed. 19438); emphasis
added).

But a canon is at most a rule of thumb. Indeed, Suther-
land himself says that “[n]o single canon of interpretation
can purport to give a certain and unerring answer.” 2
Sutherland, supra, §4501, p. 316. And hornbooks, sum-
marizing case law, have long explained that whether a
reference statute adopts the law as it stands on the date of
enactment or includes subsequent changes in the law to
which it refers is “fundamentally a question of legislative
intent and purpose.” Fox, Effect of Modification or Repeal
of Constitutional or Statutory Provision Adopted by Refer-
ence in Another Provision, 168 A. L. R. 627, 628 (1947);
see also 82 C.J.S., Statutes §485, p. 687 (2009) (“The
question of whether a statute which has adopted another
statute by reference will be affected by amendments made
to the adopted statute is one of legislative intent and
purpose”); id., at 688 (statute that refers generally to
another body of law will ordinarily include subsequent
changes in the adopted law only “as far as the changes are
consistent with the purpose of the adopting statute’).

Thus, all interpretive roads here lead us to the same
place, namely, to context, to history, to purpose, and to
consequences. Language alone cannot resolve the stat-
ute’s linguistic ambiguity.

II

“Statutory interpretation,” however, “is not a game of
blind man’s bluff.” Dole Food Co., 588 U.S., at 484
(BREYER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
We are “free to consider statutory language in light of a

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028563
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032702.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Kathy Ruemmlerl 
1/4/2018 3:27:09 PM 
jeevacation@gmail.com 
Importance: High 
Now being reported that Trump's lawyers sent a letter to mw's publisher demanding that they not publish 
the book. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032702 
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032172.txt,"Article 1.

NYT
Building Boom in Gaza’s Ruins Belies

Misery That Remains

Ethan Bronner

June 25, 2011 -- GAZA — Two luxury hotels are opening in Gaza
this month. Thousands of new cars are plying the roads. A second
shopping mall — with escalators imported from Israel — will open
next month. Hundreds of homes and two dozen schools are about to
go up. A Hamas-run farm where Jewish settlements once stood is
producing enough fruit that Israeli imports are tapering off.

As pro-Palestinian activists prepare to set sail aboard a flotilla aimed
at maintaining an international spotlight on Gaza and pressure on
Israel, this isolated Palestinian coastal enclave is experiencing its first
real period of economic growth since the siege they are protesting
began in 2007.

“Things are better than a year ago,” said Jamal El-Khoudary,
chairman of the board of the Islamic University, who has led Gaza’s
Popular Committee Against the Siege. “The siege on goods is now 60
to 70 percent over.”

Ala al-Rafati, the economy minister for Hamas, the militant group
that governs Gaza, said in an interview that nearly 1,000 factories are
operating here, and he estimated unemployment at no more than 25
percent after a sharp drop in jobless levels in the first quarter of this
year. “Yesterday alone, the Gaza municipality launched 12 projects
for paving roads, digging wells and making gardens,” he said.

So is that the news from Gaza in mid-2011? Yes, but so is this:
Thousands of homes that were destroyed in the Israeli antirocket
invasion two and a half years ago have not been rebuilt. Hospitals

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032172
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023877.txt,"How to Teach the Twelve Cognitive Processes 131

a hero is and what leadership is, and they can determine for them-
selves who they know or have seen who is good at both. Again, real
experiences and discussions are how one learns to think about this,
but it must be done in an environment of possible truths, not prede-
termined truths. One doesn’t create a nation of people who can think
by telling them what they should think. Kids know who is the leader
among them. They should learn to discuss what it is about their leader
that makes them want to follow. This is difficult discussion to have
with a 6-year-old, but it gets easier with age.

Once again, asking kids to make judgments isn’t that unusual.
Here is a remark from a parenting book that I happened upon:

When adults praise their kids for smart judgments, the kids glow.
But here’s the clincher: kids earn more and more freedom and
independence when parents trust their judgments more and
more.®

The issue here is, yet again, not whether kids make judgments, but
whether they are taught, as a central part of what they study, how to
make judgments.

The cognitive processes depend on reasoning from evidence in a
way that makes sense. This is not something people are naturally good
at. They often exhibit faulty reasoning. Practicing reasoning means
practicing within particular domains of knowledge. Reasoning is the
same process no matter what you are reasoning about, but we don’t
reason about nothing. Learning the actual facts is important, but it
is the idea that this is important that has sent the school systems on
the wrong path. Academics study the facts, as well they should, but
they also teach the facts, which is a grievous error. How to determine
the facts and how to determine their effects on a situation is what the
processes of diagnosis, planning, and causation are all about.

HOW TO TEACH INFLUENCE

This is yet another childhood skill. Children learn how to influence
their parents and their siblings and their friends very early on. Of
course, they may not learn these things in a good way. They might
learn that temper tantrums or bullying works very well.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023877
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020937.txt,"TARP Repayments and Outstanding Loans: Most Large Banks Have Repaid

$222 Billion Paid Back’, $23 Billion Outstanding

TARP Repayments: Top 8

Bank of
America

Citigroup*

Warrant &
‘Other |

Proceeds

Wells Fargo

JPMorgan

Goldman
Sachs

Morgan
Stanley

PNC
Financial

US Bank

$20 $30 $40 $50 $60

SunTrust

Regions
Financial

Key Corp.

CIT Group**

Marshall &
Ilsley

Zions

Synovus

Popular

TARP Outstanding: Top 8

$- $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60

Note: 7) Includes warrant proceeds from banks; *Citigroup’s repayments include $2.3B repayment on the Asset Guarantee
program and $6.9B additional proceeds from selling Treasury’s ownership. **Treasury’s preferred stock investment in CIT Group

(@)E) www.kpcb.com

was lost as a result of CIT’s bankruptcy filing. Source: Dept of Treasury, data as of 2/117.

USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 191

TARP Repayments And Outstanding Loans:
Most Non-Bank TARP Recipients Have Not Repaid

$27 Billion Paid Back, $171 Billion Outstanding

TARP Repayments

General
Motors

Chrysler

Chrysler
Financial

$- $20 $40 $60

General Motors

PPIP*

GMAC

Chrysler

TALF*

GM Suppliers

Chrysler Suppliers

FHA*

TARP Outstanding

AIG

$60

wn
1

$20 $40

Note: * PPIP is Public-Private Investment Program, FHA represents the FHA Short Refinance Program, TALF is Term Asset-

(@E) www.kpcb.com

Backed Securities Loan Facility.
Source: Dept of Treasury, data as of 1/11.
USA Inc. | Income Statement Drilldown 192

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020937
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030765.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030765
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025978.txt,"﻿Global Equity Volatility Insights
Understanding when risk parity risk
increases
we estimate 68% of the
09 August 2016 Corrected
Unauthorized redistribution of this report is prohibited. This report is intended for amanda.ens@baml.com
US
Quantifying the (bond-equity correlation) risks to risk parity
Last week’s sharp sell-off in JGBs renewed concerns of forced selling by risk parity
funds. While the drawdowns in US Treasuries, US equities, and ultimately risk parity
portfolios were small and short-lived, the latent risk remains worth monitoring, as (i)
leverage is still near max levels across a variety of risk parity parametrizations, (ii) bond
allocations are historically elevated, and (iii) markets continue to be sceptical of a 2016
Fed hike. Hence we provide a simple scenario tool to help investors assess what relative
moves in bonds and equities could catalyse significant deleveraging by rules-based risk
parity funds running vol target overlays. For example, a -2% daily decline in the S&P
500 coupled with a -0.6% fall in 10y Treasury prices (poor diversification) could trigger a
25% deleveraging (of unlevered notional) today, whereas a -4% SPX drop and +1% bond
rally (good diversification) would generate no selling pressure, underscoring the critical
role played by bond-equity correlation in governing the severity of risk parity unwinds.
Europe
Buy the seasonal oil dip via bullish X-market risk reversals
Selling rich USO (WTI tracker) 3M 25d puts to fund cheaper SXEP (European Oil & Gas
equity) calls is historically attractive. Indeed the number (>2) of long SXEP calls per short
USO put is in the 90 th %-ile since 2008. The trade leverages both our commodity
strategists’ ‘buy the dip’ view and our equity strategists’ bullish outlook on the Oil & Gas
sector, which has been the worst performing over the last 1M. Moreover, the average
payoff of being long SXEP 3M 25d calls would have been >2x greater than USO 3M 25d
calls (owing to more frequent positive returns), when sized for the same upfront cost.
Asia
Own NKY Sep/Oct calendar call at vol hit YTD low level going into the Sep BOJ
Post the Jul-16 BoJ and the announcement of a ¥28.1tn fiscal stimulus package, NKY and
USDJPY 1M vols have dropped to near YTD low levels, both USDJPY and NKY 2M-1M
term structures are historically steep, pricing in a slow summer. Our strategists believe
Sep-16 BoJ’s will likely create uncertainty, however, NKY Sep-Oct ATM fwd vol currently
trades at the low end of its trading range going into BoJ’s YTD. Plus, our analysis
suggests a further squeeze in yield will likely be positive for the NKY. We recommend
buying 1x NKY Oct 17500 call vs. selling 0.65x Sep 17250 call.
Trade update: Closing the NKY Aug/Sep put calendar trade at 0.28% premium
Korean auto-callable issuance slightly rose while NKY Uridashi issuance fell in July
>> Employed by a non-US affiliate of MLPF&S and is not registered/qualified as a research analyst under
the FINRA rules.
Refer to ""Other Important Disclosures"" for information on certain BofA Merrill Lynch entities that take
responsibility for this report in particular jurisdictions.
BofA Merrill Lynch does and seeks to do business with issuers covered in its research reports. As a
result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the
objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making
their investment decision.
Refer to important disclosures on page 25 to 26. Analyst Certification on page 23. 11657850
Equity Derivatives
Global
Global Equity Derivatives Rsch
MLPF&S
Chintan Kotecha
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
chintan.kotecha@baml.com
Nitin Saksena
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
nitin.saksena@baml.com
Stefano Pascale
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
stefano.pascale@baml.com
William Chan, CFA >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong)
william.w.chan@baml.com
Jason Galazidis >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLI (UK)
jason.galazidis@baml.com
Anshul Gupta >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLI (UK)
agupta113@baml.com
Abhinandan Deb >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLI (UK)
abhinandan.deb@baml.com
Benjamin Bowler
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
benjamin.bowler@baml.com
See Team Page for Full List of Contributors
Table 1: 3M volatility (weekly changes)
Implied Realized
S&P500 11.9 (-0.7) 13.2 (-0.1)
ESTX50 19.2 (-0.6) 27.7 (0.4)
FTSE 12.6 (-0.7) 18.9 (0.1)
DAX 17.8 (-1.1) 24.6 (-0.1)
NKY 21.7 (-1.1) 27.2 (-1.2)
HSI 17.5 (-0.6) 17.2 (-0.5)
KOSPI 12.6 (-0.4) 12.9 (0.5)
EEM US 18.8 (-0.8) 22.1 (-0.9)
TOP40 19.4 (0.3) 18.1 (-0.4)
RDX 28.2 (-1.6) 25.8 (-0.6)
IBOV 21.7 (0.0) 21.7 (-0.7)
ISE30 29.9 (-0.1) 27.7 (-0.4)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
BofAML GFSI TM X-Asset Risk Landscape
GFSI makes new YTD lows as BoE & NFP boost risk assets
The GFSI declined to a new YTD low of 0.18 as of 5-Aug, a level not seen since Nov-15.
With the BoE surprising to the upside in terms of cutting rates, re-starting QE and
guiding towards more accommodative policy down the line, as well as better than
expected US non-farm payrolls, risk assets globally got a boost.
• Credit experienced the biggest decline in stress across assets: Chart 3
shows that credit (followed by equities) experienced the biggest weekly stress
decline. Indeed, Chart 5 and Chart 6 show that sovereign risk as measured by IG
& sub-IG foreign sovereign bond spreads experienced the most significant
weekly declines in stress versus their history in the GFSI.
• Europe continues to be most stressed region: Chart 4 shows that Europe is
the most stressed region in the GFSI, despite the stress declines last week. USrelated
stresses which were already relatively lower vs the other regions, were
more resilient. Indeed the only significant move higher in regional stress was in
USD Libor-OIS spreads (Chart 5), which our Rates strategists view as driven by
the anticipation of US money market mutual fund reform in October.
.
Chart 1: Latest* stress across GFSI sub-components
4.0
3.0
Red shaded area highlights components in Bearish
GFSI Stress
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
-2.0
3.50
Basis Swap USDJPY
1.78
Basis Swap EURUSD
1.61
1.24
Govt-OIS EUR
Bond Basis EUR
0.92
CDS Index Skew USD
Euro member Bond…
USDJPY Imp Vol
Libor-OIS USD
Comdty Imp Vol Crude
ESTX50 Skew
SP500 Skew
Nikkei Skew
USDJPY Skew
GBPUSD Imp Vol
Govt-OIS USD
EURJPY Skew
Libor-OIS GBP
Volume Flow
HY Bond Flow
CDS Index Skew EUR
Bond Basis USD
IG Foreign Sovrn Bond…
AUDJPY Skew
Equity Fund Flow EM
Nikkei Imp Vol
HY Corp CDS USD
Libor-OIS EUR
ESTX50 Imp Vol
Risk
Skew
Flow
Sub IG Foreign Sovrn…
HSI Imp Vol
Libor-OIS JPY
Green shaded area highlights components in
Bullish territory
IG Corp CDS USD
HY Corp CDS EUR
Comdty Imp Vol Gold
IG Corp CDS EUR
FTSE Imp Vol
Money Mkt Flow
Comdty Imp Vol Copper
-0.73
3Y/5Y Credit Curve EUR
-0.77
SP500 Imp Vol
-0.81
Int Rate Imp Vol USD
-0.82
EURUSD Imp Vol
-1.11
Int Rate Imp Vol EUR
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. *Latest as of 05-Aug-16
Chart 2: Change** in stress across GFSI sub-components. The biggest moves were declines in stress; led by credit. Notably stress in GBP vol declined post BoE
0.6
Change in GFSI Stress
0.2
-0.2
-0.6
-1.0
0.26
Volume Flow
0.15
EURJPY Skew
0.13
0.11
CDS Index Skew USD
Basis Swap USDJPY
0.10
USDJPY Skew
Govt-OIS EUR
Int Rate Imp Vol USD
Govt-OIS USD
Comdty Imp Vol Copper
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. **Latest as of 05-Aug-16. Change vs 1 week prior (29-Jul-16).
Libor-OIS USD
USDJPY Imp Vol
Money Mkt Flow
Int Rate Imp Vol EUR
HY Bond Flow
Comdty Imp Vol Gold
HY Corp CDS USD
HY Corp CDS EUR
3Y/5Y Credit Curve EUR
IG Corp CDS EUR
Comdty Imp Vol Crude
Euro member Bond…
IG Corp CDS USD
Bond Basis USD
Equity Fund Flow EM
EURUSD Imp Vol
HSI Imp Vol
Libor-OIS JPY
Libor-OIS EUR
ESTX50 Skew
AUDJPY Skew
ESTX50 Imp Vol
FTSE Imp Vol
SP500 Imp Vol
Nikkei Skew
SP500 Skew
Basis Swap EURUSD
Nikkei Imp Vol
Libor-OIS GBP
-0.22
Sub IG Foreign Sovrn…
-0.23
GBPUSD Imp Vol
-0.25
-0.43
Bond Basis EUR
IG Foreign Sovrn Bond…
-0.63
CDS Index Skew EUR
2 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
The GFSI Risk Allocator favours being underweight risk assets given the distribution of
stresses within the GFSI. The percentages of Bullish, Bearish and Neutral GFSI
components (as used in the Risk Allocator) were 8.7%, 13.0% & 78.3%, respectively as
of 5-Aug. The Risk Allocator (using Bull, Bear & Neutral weights of 2, 0, 1) suggests
reducing the underweight position to 4.3% UW from last week’s 17.4% UW.
Chart 3: Stress across assets (Rates & FX are the most stressed asset
classes – credit stress declined the most last week
Chart 4: Stress across regions (Europe is the most stressed region in the
GFSI while EM is the least stressed)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
0.01
-0.01 -0.01 -0.05
-0.12
Commodities Rates FX Equities Credit
0.1
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
0.03
-0.11 -0.11 -0.11
US Japan Europe EM
Latest stress (05-Aug-16)
Change in stress
Latest stress (05-Aug-16)
Change in stress
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. 1wk change (22-Jul-16 to 29-Jul-16).
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. 1wk change (22-Jul-16 to 29-Jul-16).
Chart 5: Top 10 movers in stress (1-week abs chg %-ile vs history*)
Stress fall
Stress rise
100% 99%
100%
95% 93%
90%
85%
81% 80% 78% 77%
80%
69%
70%
%-ile of abs chg in stress vs history*
60%
50%
IG Foreign Sovrn
Bond Spread
Sub IG Foreign
Sovrn Bond…
Libor-OIS GBP
CDS Index Skew
EUR
GBPUSD Imp Vol
Libor-OIS JPY
Comdty Imp Vol
Copper
Basis Swap
EURUSD
Libor-OIS USD
Libor-OIS EUR
Chart 6: Global volatility & credit spread stress in the GFSI
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
-1.2
Latest stress (05-Aug-16)
0.04 0.01
Rates Vol
Commodity Vol
HY CDS
-0.01 -0.03
IG CDS
Change in stress
FX Vol
-0.08 -0.10
Equity Vol
-0.23
Sovrn risk
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. * %-ile of weekly move in stress vs all historical weekly
moves (earliest 3-Jan-00). Bar colours represent rise (red) or fall (green) in stress. 1wk change (22-Jul-
16 to 29-Jul-16).
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. 1wk change (22-Jul-16 to 29-Jul-16).
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 3
Volatility in the US
Quantifying the (bond-equity correl) risks to risk parity
Last week’s sharp sell-off in JGBs (Chart 7) following the BoJ’s decision not to cut rates
renewed investor fears of forced selling by risk parity funds. However, the spill-over
into US Treasuries was relatively muted (Chart 7), and coupled with a small and fleeting
drawdown in US equities, risk parity portfolio volatility failed to rise materially (Chart 8).
Consequently, risk parity funds were likely forced to unwind little to none of their
leverage last week and remain near max leverage levels (Chart 9).
For this very reason, the latent risk in this corner of the quant fund space remains worth
monitoring. Furthermore, as we noted post-Brexit, fixed income allocations within risk
parity funds are historically elevated today. And with federal-funds futures markets
implying a ~25% chance of a Sep rate hike and less than a 50% probability of a Dec
hike, bond markets may be surprised by a 2016 Fed hike.
Chart 7: Last week’s sharp sell-off in JGBs did
not spill-over into US Treasuries
104
103
102
101
100
99
Jan-16 Apr-16 Jul-16
10y JGB futures total return
108
106
104
102
100
98
10y UST futures total return (right)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Daily data from 4-
Jan-16 through 5-Aug-16.
Chart 8: Consequently, risk parity portfolio
volatility remained quite muted
10%
9%
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
Aug-
12
Aug-
13
Aug-
14
Aug-
15
Aug-
16
Historical volatility of unlevered risk
parity portfolio
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Equity, fixed income,
and commodity components within the hypothetical risk parity
investment are represented by the S&P500, 10-Year US Treasury
Bonds, and the S&P GSCI Index respectively. Risk parity
allocations are determined and rebalanced monthly using prior
12-month realized volatility and correlations. Historical volatility
calculated using EWMA with a lambda equal to 0.94.
Chart 9: Hence risk parity funds did not delever
materially and remain highly levered
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
LOW Vol Target (6%) & Lvg (1.5x)
MEDIUM Vol Target (8%) & Lvg (2x)
HIGH Vol Target (10%) & Lvg (3x)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Daily data from 31-
Dec-12 through 27-Jun-16. Equity, fixed income, and commodity
components within the hypothetical risk parity investment are
represented by the S&P500, 10-Year US Treasury Bonds, and the
S&P GSCI Index, respectively. Risk parity allocations are
determined and rebalanced monthly using prior 12-month
realized volatility and correlations.
Monitoring relative equity/bond moves for potential risk parity deleveraging
It is intuitive to think that rising volatility corresponds to an increase in model-driven
selling pressure from risk parity strategies. However, what’s less appreciated in our
view is the impact on risk parity allocations as a result of the relative dynamics
between component volatilities and correlation. For example, through the close on the
Monday post-Brexit (27-Jun-16), S&P 500 volatility rose from 9.6% two days prior to
17.9% (increase of 1.9x) while 10-Year US Treasury Futures return volatility rose 4.3%
to 6.6% (increase of 1.5x). Despite these outsized vol moves, in a recent report we
showed that owing to the diversification (increasingly negative correlation) between
equities and bonds, unlevered risk parity portfolio volatility remained stable and hence,
target vol overlays were less likely to be subject to model-driven selling.
Given low levels of realized volatility across asset classes, it’s also intuitive to expect
continued elevated levels of leverage in risk parity products. To the extent that the
leverage is via vol control overlays, there are reasonable concerns on the potential
market impact should these model-driven investments be forced to simultaneously
deleverage. To that end, we provide a simple scenario tool (Chart 10) to help investors
assess what relative moves in the S&P 500 and 10-year US Treasury futures could
catalyze significant deleveraging by rules-based, vol-controlled risk parity funds.
4 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Importantly, this scenario tool is a function of (1) current unlevered risk parity volatility,
(2) current risk parity component weights, and (3) the maximum leverage of the target
volatility overlay. For simplicity, we used only a two asset risk parity portfolio of equity
and fixed income applied to the S&P 500 and 10-Year US Treasury Futures.
Chart 10: Current theoretical deleveraging amounts (of unlevered notional) for an equity/fixed
income risk parity portfolio with an 8% target volatility overlay and 2x max leverage cap
Assumes a trailing unlevered volatility of 3.1%, unlevered equity and fixed income weights of 22% and 78% respectively,
and leverage at a maximum of 2.0 times
5%
Daily 10-year USD Treasury Futures Total Return
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
-4%
Brexit
Aug-15 Risk Flare
Taper Tantrum
-5%
-5% -4% -3% -2% -1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Daily S&P 500 Total Return
> 50% Delever 50% to 25% Delever 25% to 0% Delever No Delever
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 5-Aug-16. Equity and fixed income components within the theoretical risk parity
investment are represented by S&P 500 total return and 10-Year US Treasury Futures total return. Risk parity allocations are determined
monthly and rebalanced using prior 12-month realized volatility. Unlevered portfolio volatility for determining target volatility leverage
measured using EWMA with lambda equal to 0.94.
For example, last Friday 10-Year US Treasury futures declined about 60bps. Had the
S&P 500 declined 2.0%, we would have expected about 25% of the unlevered notional
of a model 8% vol-targeted, 2.0x max leverage risk parity portfolio to deleverage. The
S&P 500 was in fact up 86bps on a total return basis which according to the tool falls in
the region of no deleveraging.
Also, to put recent events in perspective, we plotted on the scenario tool the respective
moves in the S&P 500 and 10-Year US Treasury futures during the Taper Tantrum (19-
Jun-2013), the Aug-15 risk flare (24-Aug-15), and post-Brexit (24-Jun-2016). Note, for
an accurate assessment through those events, we would also need to reconfigure the
scenario tool for the respective unlevered risk parity volatility and risk parity component
weights on those dates. However, with current measures for both, the tool does
estimate current deleveraging flows should we see similar equity and bond moves today.
Interestingly, equity/bond moves through the Aug-15 risk flare would not cause a
deleveraging today. The reason is bonds have increased in allocation since last August
(78% vs. 66%), and hence the portfolio is more resilient towards equity market declines
(but consequently also more sensitive to fixed income declines).
The scenario tool also underscores impact on risk parity leverage as a result of the
relative dynamics between component volatility and correlation. For example, the first
and third quadrants (upper right and lower left sections) are dominated by scenarios of
greater than 50% deleveraging. On the other hand, the second and fourth quadrants
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 5
have episodes of more benign model-driven deleveraging. In each quadrant exists
examples of simultaneously increasing equity and bond volatility (that is, high absolute
equity and bond daily returns). However, in the first and third quadrant, equity and bond
moves are in the same direction, which would likely be an example of increasing
correlation. On the other hand, in the second and fourth quadrant equity and bond
moves are in opposite directions and hence correlation is subject to a decrease. The
main takeaway here is the most risk of model driven deleveraging from vol controlled
risk parity funds comes when both volatility and correlation of the underlying
components rise together.
6 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Week in review & notable trends (US)
US equities at new all-time highs on upbeat employment report
Both the S&P500 and NASDAQ finished the week higher marking fresh all-time highs as
the July nonfarm payrolls and average hourly earnings came in better-than-expected. As
a result, VIX fell to its lowest levels since Jul-14 and the SPX 1y vs. 1m ATMf implied vol
spread rose to its highest level in almost four years on lower short dated vol.
Across other asset classes, the USD finished with gains against other major currencies,
while Treasury yields rose across the curve, which partly explained the outperformance
(underperformance) in Financials (Utilities) (i.e., +1.7% and -2.7%, respectively).
Most companies (86% as of 5-Aug) in the SPX have reported Q2 results and the blended
(actual + estimated) yoy earnings decline for Q2-2016 now stands at -3.5%, less than
the expected decline of -5.5% as of 30-Jun. Analysts expect CY16 earnings decline of -
0.3% which would mark the first time SPX has reported two consecutive years of
earnings decline since 2008. Earnings growth is now expected to resume in Q4-16.
Chart 11: The SPX vol term-structure steepened materially on lower
shorter dated implied vol with the 1yr-1m ATMf implied vol spread
reaching its highest level in almost 4 years
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
-5%
Aug-12
Nov-12
Feb-13
May-13
Aug-13
Nov-13
Feb-14
May-14
Spread A - B
SPX 1yr ATMf implied vol (A)
SPX 1m ATMf implied vol (B)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Daily data from 8-Aug-12 to 8-Aug-16.
Aug-14
Nov-14
Feb-15
May-15
Aug-15
Nov-15
Feb-16
May-16
Aug-16
With SPX rallying on a stronger-than-expected July jobs report,
SPX implied vol took a further leg down, especially in the
shorter end of the vol curve. Indeed, SPX 1m ATMf implied vol
ended the week at 9.1 vol pts, within striking distance of its 2-
year lows.
On the other hand, longer dated ATMf implied vols did not fall
nearly as much causing a material steepening in the vol term
structure. For instance, the 1yr-1m implied vol spread reached
its highest level since 27-Sep-12 (6.4 vol pts).
Chart 12: Near multi-year flat call skew on Biotech (IBB) makes long call
spreads an attractive option strategy to initiate or replace long positions
to lock-in profits from the recent strong rally
55%
20.0%
50%
45%
40%
17.5%
15.0%
35% 45th %-ile
12.5%
30%
25%
10.0%
20%
7.5%
15%
10%
5%
5.0%
2.5%
0%
0.0%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
5-day MA of spread A - B (RHS)
IBB 1M ATMf implied vol (A)
IBB 1M 110 implied vol (B)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Daily data from 5-Aug-11 to 5-Aug-16.
Since its peak in Jul-15, the Biotech sector (NBI Index) has been
on one of its worst runs in decades, underperforming the broad
market benchmark (SPX) by a whopping ~30% on a total return
basis. However, more recently the sector has regained some
lost ground on solid large-cap earnings reports (i.e., +13.2%
since 1-Jul, 9.3% above the SPX).
While short-dated implied vol has dropped considerably as a
consequence of the recent rally, it still remains supported on a
5-yr basis. Also, upside vol has been richening vs. ATM vol, with
the 1m IBB ATM-110 implied vol spread reaching its lowest
level in five years on 4-Aug and finishing the week at 1.2 vol pts
(3 rd 5-yr %-ile).
Investors with a constructive view on the sector who are
concerned about a reversal of the recent gains should consider
replacing or initiating long position via short dated ATM calls
partially financed by expensive OTM calls.
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 7
Chart 13: The 2016 election move implied by the VIX term structure is,
in our estimate*, approx. 1.4%...
Interpolated Oct future (level where Sep/Oct/Nov Fly = 0)
Expected Oct future based on median level of ~1M/2M/3M fly
VIX futures (adjusted for holidays)
18.1
17.9
17.6
17.4
17.1
16.9
16.6
16.4
16.1
15.9
15.6
15.4
15.1
14.9
14.6
Excess vol vs
median levels
Implied daily move on election
day = 1.4% vs. a typical realized
''election day"" move of 1.5% (see
Chart 14)
Sep16 Oct16 Nov16
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Daily data from 2-Jun-09 to 5-Aug-16. *Day count
adjustment = we adjust the VIX futures curve to reflect the Trade-Day/252 day-count convention and
use SQRT ((30/365*252/T)) as the adjustment factor to convert to the common day-count
convention used in variance swaps. Term-structure adjustment = we add the median level of the daycount
adjusted generic 1m/2m/3m fly (i.e. -0.5x Sep fut. +1xOct fut. -0.5x Nov fut.) to take into
account the usual VIX term structure.
Using the VIX term structure in the Sep/Oct/Nov buckets and
adjusting for term structure/day convention (see footnote to
Chart 13), we estimate the option markets’ implied move over a
single day in the Oct-Nov period (which encompasses the US
election on 8-Nov).
Our estimated implied move is 1.4% which is notably very close
to the typical 1-day post-election day SPX realized move over
past election cycles (1.5% since 1928) (see Chart 14).
Importantly, there is a larger-than-typical variation in the
distribution of all daily post-election SPX returns (34.0 vol pts
vs. 18.4 vol pts for daily SPX returns since Jan-1928), with the
largest and the fourth largest daily post-election SPX returns
since 1928 occurring in the last two election cycles alone (see
Chart 14).
Chart 14: …which is notably very close to the typical SPX daily realized
move post-elections since 1928
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
Implied move around 2016
election day (see Chart 13)
Hence, investors who believe this is not your typical election (to
quote President Obama at the latest Democratic National
Convention) may still find that option markets are currently
pricing too little of a move.
However, as we have recently argued the debate about whether
a Trump win would be good or bad for markets coupled with the
inability to exactly pinpoint real risks are likely headwinds to a
sizeable market shock.
1.0%
0.0%
6-Nov-28
8-Nov-32
3-Nov-36
5-Nov-40
7-Nov-44
2-Nov-48
4-Nov-52
6-Nov-56
8-Nov-60
3-Nov-64
5-Nov-68
7-Nov-72
2-Nov-76
4-Nov-80
6-Nov-84
8-Nov-88
3-Nov-92
5-Nov-96
7-Nov-00
2-Nov-04
4-Nov-08
6-Nov-12
8-Nov-16
Abs. post election day SPX realized move Average from 1928 to 2012
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data from Nov-28 to Aug-16.
8 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Table 2: Current S&P500 volatility and correlation measures relative to the prior two year of historical daily data
1-week change
Over 2-year historical period
5-Aug-16 29-Jul-16 Change
Current
ranking
Minimum 25% Median 75% Maximum
1-month ATM implied volatility 9.1% 9.9% -0.8% 0.1% 9.0% 11.2% 12.7% 15.4% 31.8%
1-year ATM implied volatility 15.4% 16.0% -0.6% 13.1% 14.4% 15.8% 16.5% 17.6% 22.5%
1-week intraday realized volatility 8.6% 9.9% -1.3% 11.5% 6.1% 10.1% 12.1% 16.4% 53.7%
1-year minus 1-month term structure 6.4% 6.1% 0.3% 100.0% -12.0% 2.1% 3.7% 4.6% 6.4%
3-month 90 minus 110 skew 9.5% 9.6% -0.1% 3.1% 9.1% 11.1% 11.5% 11.9% 13.8%
1-year top 50 implied correlation 50.31 55.08 -4.77 3.3% 48.38 53.81 55.57 57.90 67.89
3-month top 50 realized correlation 47.71 51.08 -3.38 74.9% 25.85 33.29 39.89 47.71 60.41
VIX 1-month ATMf implied vol 82.6% 88.8% -6.2% 40.3% 62.1% 77.4% 86.1% 98.1% 162.2%
VIX 1-month 110 minus 90 skew 20.0% 22.2% -2.2% 39.7% 9.3% 17.9% 20.9% 23.9% 30.3%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 9
Volatility in Europe
Buy the seasonal oil dip via bullish X-market risk reversals
Levered X-market risk reversal: Sell 1x USO 3M 25d (~88% strike) puts
to fully fund 2.1x SXEP (Oil & Gas equity) 25d (~106% strike) calls (indic.)
Alternative (unlevered) implementation: Sell USO 25d puts to fund fully
fund closer to the money SXEP calls
The seasonal sell-off in oil presents a ‘buy the dip’ opportunity according to our
commodity strategists, who expect prices to rebound to $55/bbl by year end. In fact
current levels of ~$40 are close to the summer floor ($39) they had previously
suggested.
BofAML strategists have turned bullish Oil & Gas equities given more CB (BoE)
easing, attractive div yields and exposure to the EM recovery narrative. Moreover, Oil &
Gas has been the worst performing Stoxx 600 sector over the last 1M, suggesting it has
ample scope to rally if it is to catch up to the broader equity market (Chart 15).
USO (Oil ETF) puts are rich vs. SXEP (European Oil & Gas equity) calls: The number
of long SXEP 25d calls that can be fully funded by selling 1 short USO 25d put is near
historical highs (90 th percentile since ’08, Chart 16). In contrast, both SXEP and USO risk
reversals are only modestly more attractive than their historical medians.
SXEP calls would have offered better value than USO calls at current levels in terms
of average historical payoffs as well as the frequency of positive returns (when sized for
the same upfront cost, Chart 17). Note that an unlevered implementation of the trade
allows for early participation in any potential SXEP rally (as the SXEP call strike is near
the money) while providing a ~12% buffer before incurring losses (at expiry) on the
short USO leg (Chart 18).
CSPP has purchased an outsized proportion of Energy corporate bonds and this has
yet to feed through to equities according to our credit strategists (Chart 19): The
number of Energy corporate bonds bought by the ECB is approx. 45% of the total
eligible amount – the 3 rd highest proportion across all European sectors.
Potential USO losses may be dampened if the recent $/Oil correlation persists:
Since mid-2015 oil drawdowns have largely coincided with USD weakening (Chart 20).
Chart 15: SXEP (Oil & Gas equity) has been the worst performing Stoxx
600 sector over the last 1M
20%
1M Sector Performance
15%
10%
5%
0%
-5%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data from 7-Jul-16 to 5-Aug-16.
SXXP return
SXAP
SX8P
SX7P
SX86P
SXPP
SXFP
SXIP
SXOP
SXNP
SXTP
SX4P
SXRP
SXMP
SXKP
SXQP
SX6P
SX3P
SXDP
SXEP
Chart 16: The leverage provided by the X-market risk reversal (long
SXEP call / short USO put) is attractive from a historical standpoint
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
SXEP call vs.
USO put
SXEP call
vs. put
USO call
vs. put
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
# of long 3M 25d calls per short 3M 25d put percentile of ratio (rhs)*
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 5-Aug-16, using indicative mid prices.
*Percentiles since Jan-08.
10 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Chart 17: SXEP calls would have generated a higher average payoff and
more frequent positive returns vs. USO calls (when sized for an upfront
cost equal to the current price of the USO 3M 25d put)
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Avg Payoff Freq of >0
2.1x SXEP 3M 25d calls: 2.9% 27%
1.3x USO 3M 25d calls: 1.4% 10%
0%
'08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16
SXEP Call Payoff
USO Call Payoff
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data from 1-Jan-16 to 5-Aug-16.
Backtesting is hypothetical in nature and reflects application of the screen prior to its introduction. It
is not intended to be indicative of future performance.
Chart 18: Selling the USO 25d put (~8.7 strike as of 5-Aug) to buy the
SXEP 42d call (~280 strike as of 5-Aug) for ~0 provides early upside
participation and a ~12% downside buffer on the short USO put leg
300
290
280
270
260
250
240
230
220
Long SXEP call strike
(unlevered implementation)
Jan16
Jan16
Jan16
Feb16
Feb16
Mar16
Mar16
Apr16
Apr16
May16
May16
Jun16
Jun16
Jul16
Jul16
Jul16
SXEP
Short USO put strike
USO (rhs)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data from 1-Jan-16 to 5-Aug-16. Backtesting is
hypothetical in nature and reflects application of the screen prior to its introduction. It is not
intended to be indicative of future performance.
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
Chart 19: Number of bonds purchased by the ECB in their CSPP
programme by sector
140
# Bonds Purchased
120
% of Eligible
100
80
60
40
20
0
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.
55%
45%
35%
25%
15%
Chart 20: Oil drawdowns have recently coincided with $ weakening
70%
50%
30%
10%
-10%
-30%
Negative correlation would have helped
dampen potential USD losses on the
short USO put leg
'07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16
USO vs. EURUSD correlation* Conditional on USO down
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data from 18-Apr-07 to 5-Aug-16.
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 11
Week in review (Europe)
The FTSE100 reached 13 months highs last week as the BOE exceeded market
expectations by announcing a 25 bp rate cut (its first rate cut in 7yrs), a further £60bn
of QE purchases (vs forecasted £50 bn) while also hinting at more potential stimulus in
the autumn. Unsurprisingly, GBPUSD fell further on the back of this. The better-thanexpected
US nonfarm payrolls that beat all surveyed forecasts helped drive US markets
to new all-time closing highs also helped European equities rebound from a mid-week
trough. As a result, the V2X has retraced close to its 11 month lows as foreseeable
catalysts are behind us for a potentially quieter end to the summer.
• Long dated ESTX50 var term structure is historically elevated; vol term
structure is not: The dislocation of 3y var convexity (var strike/ATMf volatility)
vs that of 1y, which in itself is near extremes, is particularly striking
• European issuance of ESTX50-linked structured products picked up in July:
We estimate issuance of ~€120Mn/day in July, which compares to €5Mn daily
issuance in June and €55Mn daily issuance in 1H16 (excluding June).
• The current vega outstanding in SX5E-linked products is €143Mn, which is in
its 97 th percentile since Jan-14 (when our records begin). Moreover, this could
rise to as much as €169Mn if the SX5E rallied to 3280.
Long-dated ESTX50 var term structure is steep; vol term structure is not
Despite a significantly steep longer dated ESTX50 variance term structure (vs its
average since 2008), the volatility term structure is nearly flat. As a result, the level of
ESTX50 long dated variance is historically elevated vs the level of long dated vol. The
dislocation of 3y var convexity (varswap strike/ATMf vol ratio) vs 1y var convexity (which
in itself is near its historic highs) is particularly striking.
Chart 21: Longer dated ESTX50 variance term structure is significantly
elevated vs long term average – the extreme steepness is not mirrored
in the ATMf volatility term structure
30%
28%
26%
24%
22%
20%
18%
16%
1m
2m
3m
6m 1y 2y 3y
vol surface - Current
SX5E
var surface - Current
vol surface - Avg since 2008 var surface - Avg since 2008
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data: 02-Jan-08 to 5-Aug-16. Current represents
snapshot as of 5-Aug-16
Chart 22: ESTX50 variance convexity (varswap strike/ATMf vol ratio) is
near extremes – the dislocation of 3y var convexity vs that of 1y, which
in itself is near extremes, is particularly striking
1.40
1.35
1.30
1.25
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.05
1.00
Jan-08
99.7 percentile
96.1 percentile
Aug-08
Mar-09
Oct-09
May-10
Dec-10
Jul-11
SX5E 1y var convexity
Feb-12
Sep-12
Apr-13
Nov-13
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data: 02-Jan-08 to 5-Aug-16.
Jun-14
Jan-15
Aug-15
Mar-16
SX5E 3y var convexity
Structured product Jul update: EU issuance picked up; Korean issuance lagged
We estimate issuance of ESTX50-linked structured products in Europe was
~€120Mn/day in July, much higher than the €5Mn daily issuance in June and €55Mn daily
issuance in 1H16 (excluding June). This compares to ~€20Mn daily issuance in July out of
Korea.
12 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Chart 23: European issuance of ESTX50-linked products rose to €9.9bn
so far in 2016 (vs €7.2bn as of 4-Jul)
EUR bn
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Korea Europe 2016 annualised
16.6
14.3
16.7
9.9
9.5
1.2
3.1
2013 2014 2015 2016
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 4-Aug-16
12.3
Total
annualised
expected: 20.5
Chart 24: Issuance of ESTX50-linked structured products in Korea was in
line with the 2016 issuance trend
EUR bn
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Jan-14
Mar-14
May-14
Issuance of SX5E structured products in South Korea
Rapid growth of SX5E
products in Korean
structured market
Jul-14
Sep-14
Nov-14
Jan-15
Mar-15
May-15
Jul-15
Sep-15
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 31-Jul-16
Issuance slowed
down due to
China sell-off and
new local
regulations
Nov-15
Jan-16
Mar-16
May-16
Jul-16
Current vega outstanding near at least 2.5y high as European issuance picks up
We estimate the current vega outstanding in SX5E-linked products (issued in Europe
and Korea) sums up to €143Mn, which is in its 97 th percentile since Jan-14 (when our
records begin). Moreover, this could rise to as much as €169Mn if the SX5E rallies to
3280 (assuming no net SX5E-linked issuance 1 , Chart 25, 26 and Chart 27).
Chart 25: We estimate the current vega outstanding in SX5E-linked
structured products is EUR 83Mn (European issuance) and EUR60Mn
(Korean issuance)
Vega (EUR Mn)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-20
Max vega:
EUR111mn at ~3400
spot level
Ref. spot = 2932
Max vega:
EUR61mn at ~3000
spot level
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
3600
3800
4000
4200
4400
4600
4800
5000
SX5E spot level
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 4-Aug-16
Vega (Korean issuance)
Vega (European issuance)
Chart 26: The ESTX50 vega outstanding due to structured products
issuance could rise to EUR168Mn, assuming no new net issuance
Vega (EUR Mn)
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-20
Max vega:
EUR168mn at ~3220
spot level
Ref. spot = 2932
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
3600
3800
4000
4200
4400
4600
4800
5000
SX5E spot level
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 4-Aug-16
Vega (Aggregated issuance)
1
i.e. notional of newly issued structured products = notional of expiring structured
products
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 13
Chart 27: The current vega outstanding in the ESTX50-linked structured products is EUR 143mn,
which is in the 97 th percentile since 3-Jan-14
EUR Mn
160
SX5E structured products vega notional
Current SX5E structured products vega notional outstanding
140
120
97th percentile
100
80
60
Jan-14
Mar-14
May-14
Jul-14
Sep-14
Nov-14
Jan-15
Mar-15
May-15
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
Jan-16
Mar-16
May-16
Jul-16
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 4-Aug-16
Table 3: Volatility measures of major equity indices in the EMEA region (data as of 05-Aug-16)
3Mth ATM implied volatility 10D realised volatility 12Mth–3Mth ATM i-vol spread 3Mth 90-110 skew
Equity
index
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Current change 2Yr percentile Current change 2Yr percentile Current change 2Yr percentile Current change 2Yr percentile return
ESTX50 19.2% -0.6% 31% 16.6% 5.6% 29% 1.0% 0.2% 87% 8.4% -0.1% 79% -0.6%
FTSE 12.6% -0.7% 21% 10.9% 5.2% 29% 3.4% 0.5% 100% 7.5% 0.0% 10% 1.0%
DAX 17.8% -1.1% 19% 13.6% 2.9% 11% 1.8% 0.4% 96% 8.6% -0.4% 78% 0.3%
CAC 18.5% -0.7% 30% 15.4% 5.3% 27% 0.9% 0.3% 88% 8.6% 0.3% 86% -0.7%
SMI 13.8% -1.2% 25% 14.5% 3.6% 51% 1.7% 0.6% 100% 7.6% -0.8% 57% 0.8%
RDXUSD 28.2% -1.6% 6% 19.5% 9.2% 8% 1.1% 0.3% 89% 6.0% -0.1% 15% 1.7%
TOP40 19.4% 0.3% 59% 11.1% 2.1% 19% 2.3% 0.1% 91% 8.7% -0.2% 63% -1.2%
ISE30 29.9% -0.1% 96% 25.2% -21.6% 76% -0.9% 0.0% 7% 6.3% 0.1% 77% 1.0%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
European volatility: Sector snapshot
Table 4: Volatility measures and indicative option prices for major European sector indices (data as of 05-Aug-16)
Bearish <<<< --------------------------------------------------- >>>> Bullish
3Mth ATMf implied volatility Real vol* 3Mth 95%-85% put spread** 3Mth 100%-110% call spread**
3Mth 90%-110% risk
reversal**
Current
Current
Current
price Weekly
Max price Weekly
Max price*** Weekly
Weekly 2Yr
(% of change 2Yr payout (% of change 2Yr payout (% of change 2Yr
Current change %-ile Current spot) (bps) %-ile ratio spot) (bps) %-ile ratio spot) (bps) %-ile
SX3P (Fd&Bv) 13.0% -2.7% 6% 12.9% 0.9% -27 15% 11.7 2.5% -18 19% 3.9 -0.5% -33 20% -0.5%
SX6P (Utils) 16.4% -1.0% 32% 20.6% 1.2% -10 31% 8.3 3.0% -11 45% 3.3 -0.6% 0 22% -1.7%
SX7E (Banks) 33.5% -2.3% 76% 48.0% 2.6% -13 82% 3.9 4.0% -7 75% 2.5 -0.5% 0 37% -1.8%
SX7P (Banks) 28.2% -2.8% 75% 39.8% 2.2% -7 77% 4.6 3.8% -17 71% 2.7 -0.5% 17 35% 0.0%
SXAP (Auto) 25.5% -1.1% 56% 33.4% 2.0% -7 52% 4.9 3.7% -8 64% 2.7 -0.6% 3 21% 0.6%
SXDP (Health) 15.3% -0.5% 24% 12.7% 1.1% -5 27% 9.1 2.8% -7 35% 3.5 -0.4% 3 16% -0.9%
SXEP (Oil&Gas) 23.5% -0.4% 44% 23.6% 1.9% -2 44% 5.4 3.6% -4 44% 2.8 -0.6% 3 28% -0.4%
SXIP (Insur) 23.6% -0.4% 86% 31.7% 1.8% -2 84% 5.6 3.6% -3 88% 2.8 -0.6% 2 15% 0.8%
SXKP (Telecom) 22.4% -0.2% 81% 23.4% 1.7% -1 75% 5.9 3.6% -2 87% 2.8 -0.7% 1 7% 0.5%
SXNP (Indust) 21.5% 0.0% 67% 21.9% 1.7% 0 71% 5.8 3.4% 0 66% 2.9 -0.4% 1 74% 0.2%
SXPP (Basic) 32.4% -1.6% 53% 29.7% 2.5% -7 53% 3.9 3.9% -5 59% 2.5 -0.4% 2 8% 1.3%
SXQP (Prsnl&HH Gds) 15.4% 0.0% 33% 16.9% 1.0% 0 25% 9.7 2.8% -1 34% 3.5 -0.5% 1 17% 0.0%
SXRP (Retail) 22.1% -0.1% 90% 23.4% 1.7% 0 89% 5.9 3.5% -1 94% 2.8 -0.6% 1 7% 0.5%
SXTP (Trvl&Lsre) 19.9% -0.1% 55% 26.9% 1.7% -1 65% 6.0 3.2% -1 53% 3.1 -0.2% -1 69% 0.4%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research *Real vol = EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving Average) volatility, which measures historical price volatility but assigns greater importance to recent returns. Sigma(t)^2 =
0.94*Sigma(t-1)^2+(1-0.94)*r(t)^2, where r(t) is the return on day t. **Indicative mid prices; strikes as % of forward ***Negative values indicate that the bullish risk reversal takes in a credit.
Equity
index
Weekly
return
14 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Volatility in Asia
Own NKY calendar call going into the uncertainty Sep BOJ
Trade update: Closing the NKY Aug/Sep put calendar trade opened on 25-Jul
The short NKY Aug16 15500 put vs. long NKY Sep16 15500-14500 put spread trade
was opened on 25-Jul at 0.24% premium and was closed at 0.28% premium on 8-Aug as
we are approaching the Aug16 expiry. In addition, the Sep-16 NKY put spread has
already carried well by selling the inflated BOJ risk premium even with the spot being
largely unchanged.
NKY & USDJPY 1Mth vols are down to YTD low: Pricing in a slow summer
With the Japanese government announcing a ¥28.1tn fiscal stimulus package last week,
the Abe administration has laid out both its new monetary and fiscal policies. In the
short-term, there are few catalysts and both NKY and USDJPY 1Mth implied volatilities
have retraced materially. VNKY is at 21.5 and USDJPY 1M ATM vol is at 9.8%, near their
YTD low levels.
USDJPY 2M-1M term structure at its steepest & NKY’s in its 98 th %-ile since ‘11
FX has been the main driver in the current Macro world. Chart 29 shows that the
USDJPY 2-month minus 1-month term structure is at its highs since 2011. The Sep BOJ
meeting is expected to be held on 21-Sep so USDJPY 1-month options do not cover the
event. Notably, the NKY term structure is also very steep at 1.5%, which is in its 98 th
percentile since 2011. The NKY term structure was at its steep at 2.5% in Dec-13.
Chart 28: Japanese equity volatility has dropped to YTD lows; USDJPY
short-dated vol also retraced to near YTD low levels
Chart 29: USDJPY 2M-1M ATM term structure (1.7%) is at its 5-year high
while the NKY 2M-1M term structure (1.5%) is at its 98 th percentile
55%
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
May-16
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
21.5%
17%
16%
15%
14%
13%
12%
11%
10%
9%
8%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
-2%
-3%
Jan-11
May-11
Sep-11
Jan-12
May-12
Sep-12
Jan-13
May-13
Sep-13
Jan-14
May-14
Sep-14
Jan-15
May-15
Sep-15
Jan-16
May-16
VNKY
USDJPY 1M ATM vol (RHS)
USDJPY 2Mth Minus 1Mth ATM Vol Current Level (1.7%)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Daily data from 5-Jan-16 to 5-Aug-16
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.
BofAML: BoJ plans for Sep16 'comprehensive assessment' create uncertainty
The BOJ’s decision in keeping “QE” or interest rate unchanged in July highlighted the
BOJ’s limits in expanding JGB purchases and digging deeper into negative interest rate
territory. More importantly, the central bank announced it will conduct a comprehensive
assessment of its policy at its Sep meeting. By giving guidance for the next meeting,
the BoJ has inevitably focused market attention on possible changes to the monetary
policy framework. Significant monetary easing, including helicopter money, cannot be
ruled out, but the more likely scenario is that the BoJ makes current monetary policy,
which is fixed on achieving 2% inflation target in a short period of time, more 'flexible'.
Market expectation for the Sep BOJ in terms of fwd vol is the near its lows YTD
With NKY Sep ATM vol at 17.8% and Oct ATM at 20%, the NKY Sep-Oct ATM forward
vol is at 21.8%, which is at the low end of the trading range going into BOJ events this
year (Chart 30). We think there is value in owning forward vol via calendar options.
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 15
A further squeeze in US and Japanese yields is most positive Japan in Asia
The strong US NFP print and the large Japan fiscal plan catalysed a global selloff in
bonds. Chart 31 shows that NKY is the most sensitive Asian market to rising USD & JPY
yield since 2010 with a correlation of 31%.
Buy 1x NKY Oct 17500 call, short 0.65x Sep 17250 call: Gamma neutral, long vol
Given the low market expectation in the BOJ and a potential rally in Japanese equities on
the back of further yield squeeze and rising BOJ expectation next month, we like owning
1x NKY Oct 17500 call vs. selling 0.65x of Sep 17250 call for 0.7% (¥116). The trade will
have a positive 9% delta, 8bps of vega and flat gamma & theta initially.
Indicative pricing (As of 8-Aug-16, Ref: 16650)
Buy 1x NKY Oct 17500 call: 1.13% (¥187) (iv: 19.2, delta: 24%, gamma: 3.8%)
Sell 0.65x NKY Sep 17250 call: 0.66% (¥110) (iv: 16.9, delta: 23%, gamma: 5.9%)
Net: 0.70% (¥116) (delta: +9, vega: 0.08%)
Chart 30: Current NKY Sep-Oct ATM volatility is cheap relatively to
implied volatility going into previous BOJ meetings in 2016
Front Month ATM Vol before BOJ
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
Jan16 BOJ
Apr16 BOJ
Jul16BOJ
Mar16 BOJ
Jun16 BOJ
Current SepOct Vol
20%
-16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -
Number of Trading Days before BOJ
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
Chart 31: The Nikkei is the most sensitive to rising USD and JPY rates
among Asian indices
40%
Correlation of Index vs. 10Yr USD & JPY Rates 31.1%
30%
20.5%
20%
16.5% 17.0% 17.2%
10%
0%
-1.7%
-10% -6.5%
NIFTY KOSPI2 HSCEI TWSE HSI AS51 NKY
Correlation of Index vs. 10Yr USD & JPY Rates
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Weekly correlation since 2010
Chart 32: Mark-to-Market of the long 1x NKY Oct 17500 call, short NKY Sep 17250 call structure
Mark-to-Market in Yen
400
300
200
100
-
15000
15100
15200
15300
15400
15500
15600
15700
15800
15900
16000
16100
16200
16300
16400
16500
16600
16700
16800
16900
17000
17100
17200
17300
17400
17500
17600
17700
17800
17900
18000
18100
18200
18300
18400
18500
18600
18700
18800
18900
19000
Buy NKY Oct 17500C, Short 0.65x Sep 17250C (At Inception)
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research Assume volatility stays constant
Buy NKY Oct 17500C, Short 0.65x Sep 17250C (1day Before Sep expiry)
16 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Week in review & notable trends (Asia)
The MSCI Asia-Pac USD Index inched down 48bps in an eventful week in terms of macro
news, with equities gains offset by USD strength. Following the monetary policy
changes announced during the BoJ, the Abe Cabinet approved a fiscal stimulus package
totalling ¥28.1tn last week. However, the Nikkei fell 190bps and the yen advanced
another 32bps over the week. The Korean government submitted a KRW28tn fiscal
package proposal to the Congress, which our economists believe should sustain growth
near term; the KOSPI2 was little changed (adding 35bps). The RBA cut rates by 25bps
as our economists expected, but Australian stocks declined with the ASX 200 dropping
117bps. Elsewhere in Asia, the HSI, HSCEI, TWSE and Nifty rallied 1.2%, 1.9% 1.2% and
0.5%, respectively.
Japanese equity implied volatility dropped to YTD lows
• Last week, most major Asian implied vols edged down as underlying indices rallied;
ASX 200 vol increased slightly despite the rate cut
• NKY vol saw a larger decline, with 3M ATM vol dropping 1.1 vol pts to 21.7% mainly
due to diminished uncertainty as the fiscal package rolled out
• Most Asian skews flattened and term structures steepened, especially the Nikkei
term structure (spread between 1yr and 1M ATM vols), which increased 3.0 vol pts
and turned positive
NKY Uridashi issuance continues to fall as existing ones haven’t knocked-out
Despite the falling NKY and relatively high implied volatility, Japanese Uridashi issuance
has further retraced as most existing products have not knocked-out. In Jul-16, there
was $450mn Uridashi products issued which are NKY linked. We estimate that the peak
of vega profile is around the current spot.
Chart 33: In Jul-16, there was $450mn Uridashi products issued which
are NKY linked
1.6
1.4
New NKY Linked Uridashi issuance
22,000
21,000
1.2
NKY Index
20,000
1.0
19,000
0.8
18,000
0.6
17,000
0.4
16,000
0.2
15,000
-
14,000
Issuance (US$bn)
Aug-14
Dec-14
Apr-15
Aug-15
Dec-15
Apr-16
Aug-16
NKY lndex
Chart 34: At current NKY levels, the estimated total vega of the NKYlinked
Uridashi products is ~US62mn, near the peak of the vega profile
Estimate outstanding vega (US$mn)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
13,000
14,000
Uridashi NKY outstanding vega
15,000
16,000
Outstanding vega for Uridashi
products
is ~US$62mn
17,000
18,000
19,000
20,000
21,000
22,000
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.
NKY
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 17
Chart 35: issuance of Korean structured products ticked up in Jul-16, but
stays relatively low as majority of the products still haven’t knocked out
3,500
KOSPI2
HSCEI
9000
3,000
SX5E
SPX
8000
2,500
HSI
Total issuance (RHS) 7000
6000
2,000
5000
1,500
4000
1,000
3000
2000
500
1000
-
0
USD Mn
Jul15
Aug15
Sep15
Oct15
Nov15
Dec15
Jan16
Feb16
Mar16
Apr16
May16
Jun16
Jul16
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.
USD Mn
Korean structured product issuance increased to US$1.9bn
in July; KOSPI2-linked products dominated
Korean auto-callable product issuance ticked up last month,
with a total of US$ 1.9bn notional issued, vs. US$ 1.6bn total
issuance in June.
Looking at individual underlyings, KOSPI2-linked products
(currently US$578mn) saw the largest increase. KOSPI2-linked
issuance hence took over SX5E-linked issuance (currently
US$436mn), which was relatively unchanged compared to June.
HSCEI-linked issuance (currently US$ 69mn) further declined
whereas HSI-linked issuance (currently US$ 262mn) increased
again. SPX-linked issuance grew to US$ 281mn.
KOSPI2 outstanding vega: US$23mn
HSCEI outstanding vega: US$74mn
Chart 36: We estimate that structured product Issuers are currently long
US$23mn of KOSPI2 vega
80
KOSPI2 Autocall Vega Outstanding Profile
Estimate KOSPI2 outstanding vega
(US$mn)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
-
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.
KOSPI2 Spot Level
Chart 37: We estimate that structured product Issuers are currently long
US$74mn of HSCEI vega
100
HSCEI Autocall Vega Outstanding Profile
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
-
Estimate HSCEI outstanding vega
(US$mn)
6500
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
9500
10000
10500
11000
11500
12000
12500
13000
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.
HSCEI Spot Level
Table 5: Volatility measures of major Asian indices (data as of 5-Aug-16)
3Mth ATM Implied Volatility 10D Realized Volatility 12Mth-1Mth ATM Vol Spread 3Mth 90-110 Skew Spread Equity Market
Weekly 4Yr Weekly 4Yr Weekly 4Yr Weekly 4Yr Weekly
Current change percentile Current change percentile Current change percentile Current change percentile return
HSI 17.5% -0.6% 57.2% 15.7% 4.9% 56.4% 2.2% 0.3% 52.0% 5.4% -0.2% 82.8% 1.2%
HSCEI 20.8% -0.5% 30.4% 17.4% 6.6% 38.1% 3.3% 0.2% 88.9% 4.2% -0.7% 77.5% 1.9%
NKY 21.7% -1.1% 47.3% 19.2% 2.0% 46.2% 1.2% 3.0% 67.5% 5.1% -0.3% 75.9% -1.9%
KOSPI2 12.6% -0.4% 15.4% 12.4% 7.1% 57.5% 3.9% 0.5% 75.6% 5.2% -0.7% 80.5% 0.3%
ASX 200 14.3% 0.5% 60.1% 9.9% 4.7% 34.0% 2.7% 0.1% 64.2% 7.1% 0.0% 55.6% -1.2%
NIFTY 14.2% -0.2% 6.3% 11.8% 2.9% 32.6% 2.6% 0.7% 38.4% 5.8% 0.6% 74.0% 0.5%
TWSE 14.6% -0.3% 63.1% 10.2% 2.0% 37.2% 0.7% 1.0% 16.8% 4.1% -0.5% 63.5% 1.2%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
18 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
TWSE 3M 25d-Call IV over SPX is near its 4-year highs
Table 6 lists Asian index pairs with the highest IV ratio vs. their 4-year histories. For
instance, the ratio of TWSE 3M 25d-Call vol over SPX is near its 4-year highs.
Chart 38: The ratio of TWSE 3M 25d-Call IV over SPX is near its 4-yr
highs (Daily data from 1-Jan-11 through 5-Aug-16)
Implied Vol
TWSE 3M 25d-Call vol SPX 3M 25d-Call vol Vol ratio
40%
1.6
35%
1.5
30%
1.4
25%
1.3
1.2
20%
1.1
15%
1.0
10%
0.9
5%
0.8
Jan-11
May-11
Sep-11
Jan-12
May-12
Sep-12
Jan-13
May-13
Sep-13
Jan-14
May-14
Sep-14
Jan-15
May-15
Sep-15
Jan-16
May-16
Ratio
Table 6: Index pairs^ with the highest implied vol ratio vs. their histories
(data as of 5-Aug-16)
Index A
(Implied vol)
Index B
(Implied Vol)
A/B Implied
Vol ratio
Ratio 4-yr
percentile
3M ATM TWSE (14.6%) SPX (11.8%) 1.23 97%
6M ATM SX5E (20.0%) SPX (13.7%) 1.46 96%
12M ATM SX5E (20.2%) SPX (15.4%) 1.31 98%
3M 25d-Put TWSE (17.1%) SPX (15.5%) 1.10 97%
6M 25d-Put TWSE (17.8%) SPX (17.9%) 0.99 93%
12M 25d-Put SX5E (24.2%) SPX (19.9%) 1.22 96%
3M 25d-Call TWSE (13.9%) SPX (9.9%) 1.41 97%
6M 25d-Call SX5E (17.5%) SPX (11.3%) 1.54 97%
12M 25d-Call SX5E (18.2%) SPX (12.8%) 1.42 98%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
^ Index universe includes the ASX200, HSCEI, HSI, KOSPI2, NIFTY, NKY, TWSE, SPX and SX5E
* mid level implied vol
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Daily data from 1-Jan-11 through 5-Aug-16
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 19
Summary of Open Trades (08-Aug-16)
Table 7: Summary of open trades as of 08-Aug-16
Trade Description
Open
Date
Open
Level
Trade
Value
Expected
Trade Term Rationale
Long SX5E vs short SPX Dec18 var swap 5-Jul-16 6.1 vols 5.2 vols
Investors should re-assess attractiveness of popular and (typically) technically
Long NKY vs short SPX Dec18 var swap 5-Jul-16 5.7 vols 4.9 vols Dec-18 expiry motivated longer-dated RV vol trades, given environment of structurally higher
Long SX5E vs short SPX Dec18 put vs put 5-Jul-16 0.00% -0.62%
political & economic risks and increasingly limited policy options
Long 3M 25d EFA put vs short 3M 25d UKX put 5-Jul-16 0.00% 0.16% 3 months FTSE 3M 25d put vol near 7hr highs vs. vol on EFA
Buy CMB Sep16 105-115% call spread
Buy ICBC Sep16 105-115% call spread
Buy BOC Sep16 105-115% call spread
5-Jul-16
5-Jul-16
5-Jul-16
2.32%
2.12%
2.10%
3.01%
4.17%
3.79%
Sep-16 SQ
expiry
Continuous Southbound inflow benefit financials sector and narrow AH premium
Long 0.5x V2X Oct16 future, long 0.5x V2X Nov16
future, short V2X Jan-17 future
11-Jul-16 0.25 vols -0.28 vols Oct-16 expiry Hedge further Brexit fallout, Italian bank & referendum risk
Buy a 6M ATM worst-of call on XLP & GLD 11-Jul-16 1.05% 0.48% 6 months Cheaply construct risk-limited “uber-barbell” portfolio
Buy a 6M ATM worst-of {SPX put, GLD call} 11-Jul-16 1.60% 1.01% 6 months Low-cost macro hedge for US equity portfolios
Buy Oct16 110%f calls on VIE FP, AI FP, IBE SQ,
STAN LN and MUV2 GY
Buy an Oct16 110%F call on an equally weighted
basket (quanto EUR)
18-Jul-16
18-Jul-16
2.37%
0.81%
2.37%
0.69%
Buy TLS 25-Aug16 95% puts 18-Jul-16 1.05% 1.67%
Buy CSL 25-Aug-16 95% puts 18-Jul-16 1.09% 0.72%
Buy Newcrest 25-Aug-16 105/115% call spreads 18-Jul-16 2.64% 1.90%
Buy BHP 25-Aug-16 105/115% call spreads 18-Jul-16 2.22% 1.26%
Replace T long position via 3M ATM calls 19-Jul-16 2.72% 2.50%
Replace LOW long position via 3M ATM calls 19-Jul-16 3.90% 3.66%
Replace RTN long position via 3M ATM calls 19-Jul-16 3.16% 3.45%
Replace CRM long position via 3M ATM calls 19-Jul-16 4.16% 3.50%
Replace CRM long position via 3M ATM calls 19-Jul-16 2.32% 1.26%
Oct-16 expiry
Oct-16 expiry
25-Aug-16
3 months
Add exposure via inexpensive upside on single names where positioning appears
particularly bearish and stocks have underperformed vs. their sectors
To hedge potential earning downside surprise
To hedge potential earnings upside surprises
Our analysts expect positive and impactful catalysts in Q3-2016; recent strong
performance and depressed short dated implied vol favor stock replacement via
calls to reduce downside risk, maintain upside and lock in profits
Overlay long WBA long position with 3M ATM calls 19-Jul-16 4.04% 2.49% 3 months Position for accelerated upside returns ahead of closing the Rite Aid acquisition
Buy a 6M ATM best-of put on SPX & TLT 18-Jul-16 0.8% 0.49% 6 months Cheap hedge against a bond tantrum
Buy a 1Y ATM worst-of call on SPX & TLT 18-Jul-16 0.9% 0.83% 1 year Cheap equity upside in a bond / equity melt-up
Buy XLF Sep 24 strike call 25-Jul-16 1.4% 1.9%
Sep-16 expiry
Buy XLU Sep 51 strike put 25-Jul-16 1.3% 2.5%
Buy a 6M ATM worst-of {XLF call, XLU put} 25-Jul-16 1.35% 2.31% 6 months
Sell 1x SX7E 1M 25d call to fully finance 1.85x
SX5E 1M 25d calls
Short VIX Oct 15 put vs. long VIX Nov 19/26 call
spread
1-Aug-16 $0.45 $0.125 Oct VIX expiry
Record outperformance of Utilities vs. Financials + FMS positioning + central bank
catalysts = potential for cyclicals / defensives mean reversion
25-Jul-16 0.0% 0.28% 1 month SX7E 1M 25d call / SX5E 1M 25d call price ratio is in the 100 th 2-yr percentile
Sell VIX Oct puts to leverage likely floor in vol ahead of US elections and cheapen
shallow hedges
Buy HSCEI Aug16 9400 call, Short Oct16 10000 call 1-Aug-16 0.00% 0.04% Aug-16 expiry Short-term bullish China trade with term structure at its steepest in 4yrs
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Prices reflective of most recently available data which may be delayed in some cases. “Trade Value” represents current valuation of trades initiated on the “Open Date”.
Summary of Closed Trades (08-Aug-16)
Table 8: Summary of closed trades as of 08-Aug-16
Open
Date
Open
Level
Close
Level Close Date Rationale
Trade Description
Buy NKY Aug-16 105%-110% call spreads & sell
90% puts
11-Jul-16 0.26% 1.73% 25-Jul-16 Take profit as the hurdle to surprise on the upside is high following a 5.8% NKY rally
Replace FB long positions via Oct-16 ATM calls 25-Jul-16 5.9% 6.1% 1-Aug-16 Take profit as Facebook rallied on better-than expected Q2 results
Replace AMZN long positions via Oct-16 ATM calls 25-Jul-16 5.5% 6.3% 1-Aug-16 Take profit as Amazon rallied on better-than expected Q2 results
Buy AAPL Oct-16 ATM protective puts 25-Jul-16 4.6% 1.2% 1-Aug-16 Remove protection as worries around disappointing Q4 guidance faded post earnings
Buy 1.5x 5-Aug-16 2950-3000 strangles by selling
1x 19-Aug-16 2950-3000 strangles
Sell NKY Aug16 15500 puts, Buy Sep16 15500-
14500 put spreads
25-Jul-16 0.00% -1.12% 5-Aug-16 The BoJ, Fed & EU bank stress tests could move mkts sharply in the near term
25-Jul-16 0.24% 0.28%
Aug-16 expiry &
Sep-16 expiry
Unwinding before the Aug16 expiry; The NKY Sep put spread has carried well
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Prices reflective of most recently available data which may be delayed in some cases. “Trade Value” represents current valuation of trades initiated on the “Open Date”.
20 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Volatility in Numbers (05-Aug-16)
Table 9: Statistics on implied, realised, skew and term structure for 3-month and 12-month vols (developed markets)
3-month
12-month
S&P500 ESTX50 FTSE DAX NKY HSI KOSPI S&P500 ESTX50 FTSE DAX NKY HSI KOSPI
Implied 11.9% 19.2% 12.6% 17.8% 21.7% 17.5% 12.6% 15.4% 20.2% 15.9% 19.6% 21.1% 18.6% 15.0%
%tile (2yr) 4.4% 30.2% 20.2% 19.0% 51.5% 30.4% 18.1% 13.1% 46.0% 46.2% 33.7% 53.2% 34.3% 24.4%
1Week Change -0.7% -0.6% -0.7% -1.1% -1.1% -0.6% -0.4% -0.6% -0.4% -0.2% -0.7% -0.7% -0.2% -0.2%
1Mth Change -2.5% -5.2% -5.1% -5.8% -1.9% -1.8% -0.5% -1.6% -2.6% -1.9% -2.8% -1.0% -0.5% -0.2%
Realised 13.1% 27.5% 18.9% 24.4% 27.0% 17.3% 12.8% 17.0% 26.1% 20.5% 25.6% 29.4% 21.9% 14.3%
%tile (2yr) 45.0% 79.9% 69.6% 68.9% 69.1% 42.2% 65.9% 95.6% 94.3% 96.4% 95.8% 98.4% 73.8% 96.7%
1Week Change -0.1% 0.4% 0.2% -0.1% -1.2% -0.3% 0.6% 0.0% -0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% -0.1% 0.1%
1Mth Change -0.4% -0.5% -0.4% -0.5% -2.7% -1.1% 0.8% -0.2% -0.1% -0.1% -0.2% 0.2% -1.6% -0.1%
Imp-real spread -1.2% -8.3% -6.4% -6.6% -5.3% 0.2% -0.3% -1.6% -5.9% -4.6% -6.0% -8.3% -3.3% 0.8%
Spread %tile (2yr) 19.8% 3.1% 8.3% 4.8% 22.5% 37.9% 18.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.5% 0.8%
1Week Change -0.6% -0.9% -0.9% -1.0% 0.2% -0.3% -1.0% -0.6% -0.2% -0.3% -0.7% -0.8% -0.1% -0.3%
1Mth Change -2.1% -4.6% -4.7% -5.3% 0.8% -0.7% -1.3% -1.4% -2.5% -1.8% -2.6% -1.2% 1.1% -0.1%
90-110 skew 9.5% 8.4% 7.5% 8.6% 5.1% 5.4% 5.2%
%tile (2yr) 3.3% 78.5% 9.4% 77.6% 53.4% 69.2% 64.2%
1Week Change -0.2% -0.1% 0.0% -0.4% -0.2% -0.2% -0.7%
1Mth Change -2.6% -0.4% -3.2% -0.5% -1.2% -1.3% -0.6%
10-day realised
12M - 3M term vol spread
S&P500 ESTX50 FTSE DAX NKY HSI KOSPI S&P500 ESTX50 FTSE DAX NKY HSI KOSPI
Current Level 6.0% 15.7% 10.5% 13.3% 18.6% 14.9% 11.9% 3.5% 1.0% 3.4% 1.8% -0.5% 1.1% 2.4%
%tile (2yr) 7.1% 22.0% 24.1% 9.3% 45.6% 36.7% 52.8% 98.3% 86.6% 100.0% 96.0% 50.8% 69.2% 72.2%
1Week Change 1.6% 5.2% 4.9% 2.4% 2.1% 4.5% 6.8% 0.1% 0.2% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.3%
1Mth Change -20.0% -37.1% -23.2% -30.1% -26.1% -6.7% -5.3% 0.9% 2.5% 3.2% 2.9% 0.9% 1.3% 0.3%
Cash index
Current Level 2,182.87 2,973.71 6,793.47 10,367.21 16,254.45 22,146.09 252.36
1Wk Change 0.43% -0.57% 1.03% 0.29% -1.90% 1.16% 0.35%
1Mth Change 4.52% 5.72% 3.79% 8.76% 3.73% 6.72% 2.21%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
Table 10: Statistics on implied, realised, skew and term structure for 3-month and 12-month vols (emerging markets)
3-month
12-month
EEM US IBOV RDXUSD TOP40 EEM US IBOV RDXUSD TOP40
Implied 18.8% 21.7% 28.2% 19.4% 21.2% 23.5% 29.3% 21.8%
%tile (2yr) 34.5% 2.4% 5.5% 59.1% 40.7% 22.0% 16.4% 80.2%
1Wk Change -0.8% 0.0% -1.6% 0.3% -0.9% -0.1% -1.3% 0.4%
1Mth Change -3.6% -3.0% -3.8% -2.3% -2.2% -1.9% -3.3% -1.0%
Realised 22.1% 21.8% 25.7% 17.9% 24.3% 27.7% 36.2% 20.4%
%tile (2yr) 65.9% 27.2% 20.8% 47.5% 94.8% 94.0% 45.7% 94.0%
1Wk Change -0.8% -0.5% -0.6% -0.4% -0.1% 0.0% -0.2% -0.1%
1Mth Change -1.5% -4.4% -4.2% -0.3% -0.6% -0.2% -0.4% -0.6%
Imp-real spread -3.2% -0.1% 2.6% 1.5% -3.1% -4.3% -6.9% 1.4%
Spread %tile (2yr) 12.9% 44.2% 52.4% 51.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 16.6%
1Wk Change -0.1% 0.5% -1.0% 0.7% -0.9% 0.0% -1.1% 0.6%
1Mth Change -2.1% 1.4% 0.4% -2.0% -1.6% -1.7% -2.9% -0.4%
90-110 skew 7.8% 5.3% 6.0% 8.7%
%tile (2yr) 63.8% 48.5% 14.8% 62.6%
1Wk Change 0.3% 0.0% -0.1% -0.2%
1Mth Change 0.0% -0.5% -0.8% -0.6%
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 21
Table 10: Statistics on implied, realised, skew and term structure for 3-month and 12-month vols (emerging markets)
10-day realised
12M - 3M term vol spread
EEM US IBOV RDXUSD TOP40 EEM US IBOV RDXUSD TOP40
Current Level 10.4% 13.2% 18.5% 11.0% 2.4% 1.8% 1.1% 2.3%
%tile (2yr) 4.2% 3.4% 5.3% 16.6% 74.1% 98.3% 88.1% 90.0%
1Wk Change -0.5% 2.4% 6.2% 2.3% -0.1% -0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
1Mth Change -31.3% -15.2% -8.8% -19.6% 1.5% 1.1% 0.5% 1.3%
Cash index
Current Level 36.62 57,661.14 1,090.44 45,385.74
1Wk Change 1.15% 0.62% 1.72% -1.16%
1Mth Change 7.86% 11.22% 1.44% 0.12%
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
22 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Analyst Certification
I, Benjamin Bowler, hereby certify that the views expressed in this research report
accurately reflect my personal views about the subject securities and issuers. I also
certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related
to the specific recommendations or view expressed in this research report.
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 23
Options Risk Statement
Potential Risk at Expiry & Options Limited Duration Risk
Unlike owning or shorting a stock, employing any listed options strategy is by definition
governed by a finite duration. The most severe risks associated with general options
trading are total loss of capital invested and delivery/assignment risk, all of which can
occur in a short period.
Investor suitability
The use of standardized options and other related derivatives instruments are
considered unsuitable for many investors. Investors considering such strategies are
encouraged to become familiar with the ""Characteristics and Risks of Standardized
Options"" (an OCC authored white paper on options risks). U.S. investors should consult
with a FINRA Registered Options Principal. For detailed information regarding the risks
involved with investing in listed options:
http://www.theocc.com/about/publications/character-risks.jsp
24 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Disclosures
Important Disclosures
FUNDAMENTAL EQUITY OPINION KEY: Opinions include a Volatility Risk Rating, an Investment Rating and an Income Rating. VOLATILITY RISK RATINGS, indicators of potential
price fluctuation, are: A - Low, B - Medium and C - High. INVESTMENT RATINGS reflect the analyst’s assessment of a stock’s: (i) absolute total return potential and (ii)
attractiveness for investment relative to other stocks within its Coverage Cluster (defined below). There are three investment ratings: 1 - Buy stocks are expected to have a total
return of at least 10% and are the most attractive stocks in the coverage cluster; 2 - Neutral stocks are expected to remain flat or increase in value and are less attractive than
Buy rated stocks and 3 - Underperform stocks are the least attractive stocks in a coverage cluster. Analysts assign investment ratings considering, among other things, the 0-12
month total return expectation for a stock and the firm’s guidelines for ratings dispersions (shown in the table below). The current price objective for a stock should be
referenced to better understand the total return expectation at any given time. The price objective reflects the analyst’s view of the potential price appreciation (depreciation).
Investment rating Total return expectation (within 12-month period of date of initial rating) Ratings dispersion guidelines for coverage cluster*
Buy ≥ 10% ≤ 70%
Neutral ≥ 0% ≤ 30%
Underperform N/A ≥ 20%
* Ratings dispersions may vary from time to time where BofA Merrill Lynch Research believes it better reflects the investment prospects of stocks in a Coverage Cluster.
INCOME RATINGS, indicators of potential cash dividends, are: 7 - same/higher (dividend considered to be secure), 8 - same/lower (dividend not considered to be secure) and 9 - pays
no cash dividend. Coverage Cluster is comprised of stocks covered by a single analyst or two or more analysts sharing a common industry, sector, region or other classification(s). A stock’s
coverage cluster is included in the most recent BofA Merrill Lynch report referencing the stock.
Price charts for the securities referenced in this research report are available at http://pricecharts.baml.com, or call 1-800-MERRILL to have them mailed.
One or more analysts responsible for covering the securities in this report owns options on the financial instrument
BofA Merrill Lynch Research Personnel (including the analyst(s) responsible for this report) receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall profitability of Bank of America
Corporation, including profits derived from investment banking. The analyst(s) responsible for this report may also receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall
profitability of the Bank’s sales and trading businesses relating to the class of securities or financial instruments for which such analyst is responsible.
Other Important Disclosures
Prices are indicative and for information purposes only. Except as otherwise stated in the report, for the purpose of any recommendation in relation to: (i) an equity security, the price
referenced is the publicly traded price of the security as of close of business on the day prior to the date of the report or, if the report is published during intraday trading, the price referenced is
indicative of the traded price as of the date and time of the report; or (ii) a debt security (including equity preferred and CDS), prices are indicative as of the date and time of the report and are
from various sources including Bank of America Merrill Lynch trading desks.
The date and time of completion of the production of any recommendation in this report shall be the date and time of dissemination of this report as recorded electronically on the platform in
which the report was accessed.
Officers of MLPF&S or one or more of its affiliates (other than research analysts) may have a financial interest in securities of the issuer(s) or in related investments.
BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.
""BofA Merrill Lynch"" includes Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (""MLPF&S"") and its affiliates. Investors should contact their BofA Merrill Lynch representative or
Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management financial advisor if they have questions concerning this report. ""BofA Merrill Lynch"" and ""Merrill Lynch"" are each global brands for BofA
Merrill Lynch Global Research.
Information relating to Non-US affiliates of BofA Merrill Lynch and Distribution of Affiliate Research Reports:
MLPF&S distributes, or may in the future distribute, research reports of the following non-US affiliates in the US (short name: legal name, regulator): Merrill Lynch (South Africa): Merrill Lynch
South Africa (Pty) Ltd., regulated by The Financial Service Board; MLI (UK): Merrill Lynch International, regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority
(PRA); Merrill Lynch (Australia): Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited, regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission; Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong): Merrill Lynch (Asia
Pacific) Limited, regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (HKSFC) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA); Merrill Lynch (Singapore): Merrill Lynch (Singapore)
Pte Ltd, regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS); Merrill Lynch (Canada): Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, regulated by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada;
Merrill Lynch (Mexico): Merrill Lynch Mexico, SA de CV, Casa de Bolsa, regulated by the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores; Merrill Lynch (Argentina): Merrill Lynch Argentina SA, regulated
by Comisión Nacional de Valores; Merrill Lynch (Japan): Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co., Ltd., regulated by the Financial Services Agency; Merrill Lynch (Seoul): Merrill Lynch International
Incorporated (Seoul Branch) regulated by the Financial Supervisory Service; Merrill Lynch (Taiwan): Merrill Lynch Securities (Taiwan) Ltd., regulated by the Securities and Futures Bureau; DSP
Merrill Lynch (India): DSP Merrill Lynch Limited, regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India; PT Merrill Lynch (Indonesia): PT Merrill Lynch Indonesia, regulated by Otoritas Jasa
Keuangan (OJK); Merrill Lynch (Israel): Merrill Lynch Israel Limited, regulated by Israel Securities Authority; Merrill Lynch (Russia): OOO Merrill Lynch Securities, Moscow, regulated by the Central
Bank of the Russian Federation; Merrill Lynch (Turkey I.B.): Merrill Lynch Yatirim Bank A.S., regulated by the Capital Markets Board of Turkey; Merrill Lynch (Turkey Broker): Merrill Lynch Menkul
Değerler A.Ş., regulated by the Capital Markets Board of Turkey; Merrill Lynch (DIFC): Merrill Lynch International (DIFC Branch), regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA); Merrill
Lynch (Spain): Merrill Lynch Capital Markets Espana, S.A.S.V., regulated by Comisión Nacional del Mercado De Valores; Merrill Lynch (Brazil): Bank of America Merrill Lynch Banco Multiplo S.A.,
regulated by Comissão de Valores Mobiliários; Merrill Lynch KSA Company, Merrill Lynch Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Company, regulated by the Capital Market Authority.
This information: has been approved for publication and is distributed in the United Kingdom (UK) to professional clients and eligible counterparties (as each is defined in the rules of the FCA
and the PRA) by MLI (UK) and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, which are authorized by the PRA and regulated by the FCA and the PRA, and is distributed in the UK to retail
clients (as defined in the rules of the FCA and the PRA) by Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited, London Branch, which is authorized by the Central Bank of Ireland and subject to limited
regulation by the FCA and PRA - details about the extent of our regulation by the FCA and PRA are available from us on request; has been considered and distributed in Japan by Merrill Lynch
(Japan), a registered securities dealer under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in Japan; is distributed in Hong Kong by Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong), which is regulated by HKSFC and
HKMA; is issued and distributed in Taiwan by Merrill Lynch (Taiwan); is issued and distributed in India by DSP Merrill Lynch (India); and is issued and distributed in Singapore to institutional
investors and/or accredited investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations) by Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited (Merchant Bank) (MLIBLMB) and Merrill Lynch
(Singapore) (Company Registration Nos F 06872E and 198602883D respectively). MLIBLMB and Merrill Lynch (Singapore) are regulated by MAS. Bank of America N.A., Australian Branch (ARBN
064 874 531), AFS License 412901 (BANA Australia) and Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited (ABN 65 006 276 795), AFS License 235132 (MLEA) distribute this report in Australia only to
'Wholesale' clients as defined by s.761G of the Corporations Act 2001. With the exception of BANA Australia, neither MLEA nor any of its affiliates involved in preparing this research report is an
Authorised Deposit-Taking Institution under the Banking Act 1959 nor regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. No approval is required for publication or distribution of this
report in Brazil and its local distribution is by Merrill Lynch (Brazil) in accordance with applicable regulations. Merrill Lynch (DIFC) is authorized and regulated by the DFSA. Research reports
prepared and issued by Merrill Lynch (DIFC) are done so in accordance with the requirements of the DFSA conduct of business rules. Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited,
Frankfurt Branch (BAMLI Frankfurt) distributes this report in Germany and is regulated by BaFin.
This research report has been prepared and issued by MLPF&S and/or one or more of its non-US affiliates. MLPF&S is the distributor of this research report in the US and accepts full
responsibility for research reports of its non-US affiliates distributed to MLPF&S clients in the US. Any US person receiving this research report and wishing to effect any transaction in any
security discussed in the report should do so through MLPF&S and not such foreign affiliates. Hong Kong recipients of this research report should contact Merrill Lynch (Asia Pacific) Limited in
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 25
respect of any matters relating to dealing in securities or provision of specific advice on securities. Singapore recipients of this research report should contact Merrill Lynch International Bank
Limited (Merchant Bank) and/or Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this research report.
General Investment Related Disclosures:
Taiwan Readers: Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or a solicitation of an offer to transact in any securities or other financial instrument. No part of
this report may be used or reproduced or quoted in any manner whatsoever in Taiwan by the press or any other person without the express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch.
This research report provides general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or
other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences). This report is not intended to provide
personal investment advice and it does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person. Investors should seek
financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in financial instruments and implementing investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report and should understand
that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for securities in any offering must be based solely on existing public information on such
security or the information in the prospectus or other offering document issued in connection with such offering, and not on this report.
Securities and other financial instruments discussed in this report, or recommended, offered or sold by Merrill Lynch, are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and are not
deposits or other obligations of any insured depository institution (including, Bank of America, N.A.). Investments in general and, derivatives, in particular, involve numerous risks, including,
among others, market risk, counterparty default risk and liquidity risk. No security, financial instrument or derivative is suitable for all investors. In some cases, securities and other financial
instruments may be difficult to value or sell and reliable information about the value or risks related to the security or financial instrument may be difficult to obtain. Investors should note that
income from such securities and other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuate and that price or value of such securities and instruments may rise or fall and, in some cases, investors may
lose their entire principal investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Levels and basis for taxation may change.
This report may contain a short-term trading idea or recommendation, which highlights a specific near-term catalyst or event impacting the issuer or the market that is anticipated to have a
short-term price impact on the equity securities of the issuer. Short-term trading ideas and recommendations are different from and do not affect a stock's fundamental equity rating, which
reflects both a longer term total return expectation and attractiveness for investment relative to other stocks within its Coverage Cluster. Short-term trading ideas and recommendations may
be more or less positive than a stock's fundamental equity rating.
Futures and options are not appropriate for all investors. Such financial instruments may expire worthless. Before investing in futures or options, clients must receive the appropriate risk
disclosure documents. Investment strategies explained in this report may not be appropriate at all times. Costs of such strategies do not include commission or margin expenses.
BofA Merrill Lynch is aware that the implementation of the ideas expressed in this report may depend upon an investor's ability to ""short"" securities or other financial instruments and that such
action may be limited by regulations prohibiting or restricting ""shortselling"" in many jurisdictions. Investors are urged to seek advice regarding the applicability of such regulations prior to
executing any short idea contained in this report.
Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or financial instrument mentioned in this report. Investors in such securities and instruments,
including ADRs, effectively assume currency risk.
UK Readers: The protections provided by the U.K. regulatory regime, including the Financial Services Scheme, do not apply in general to business coordinated by BofA Merrill Lynch entities
located outside of the United Kingdom. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.
MLPF&S or one of its affiliates is a regular issuer of traded financial instruments linked to securities that may have been recommended in this report. MLPF&S or one of its affiliates may, at any
time, hold a trading position (long or short) in the securities and financial instruments discussed in this report.
BofA Merrill Lynch, through business units other than BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, may have issued and may in the future issue trading ideas or recommendations that are inconsistent
with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Such ideas or recommendations reflect the different time frames, assumptions, views and analytical
methods of the persons who prepared them, and BofA Merrill Lynch is under no obligation to ensure that such other trading ideas or recommendations are brought to the attention of any
recipient of this report.
In the event that the recipient received this report pursuant to a contract between the recipient and MLPF&S for the provision of research services for a separate fee, and in connection
therewith MLPF&S may be deemed to be acting as an investment adviser, such status relates, if at all, solely to the person with whom MLPF&S has contracted directly and does not extend
beyond the delivery of this report (unless otherwise agreed specifically in writing by MLPF&S). MLPF&S is and continues to act solely as a broker-dealer in connection with the execution of any
transactions, including transactions in any securities mentioned in this report.
Copyright and General Information regarding Research Reports:
Copyright 2016 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. iQmethod, iQmethod 2.0, iQprofile, iQtoolkit, iQworks are service marks of Bank of America Corporation. iQanalytics®,
iQcustom®, iQdatabase® are registered service marks of Bank of America Corporation. This research report is prepared for the use of BofA Merrill Lynch clients and may not be redistributed,
retransmitted or disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research reports are distributed
simultaneously to internal and client websites and other portals by BofA Merrill Lynch and are not publicly-available materials. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and
review of this research report constitutes your agreement not to redistribute, retransmit, or disclose to others the contents, opinions, conclusion, or information contained in this report
(including any investment recommendations, estimates or price targets) without first obtaining expressed permission from an authorized officer of BofA Merrill Lynch.
Materials prepared by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel are based on public information. Facts and views presented in this material have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect
information known to, professionals in other business areas of BofA Merrill Lynch, including investment banking personnel. BofA Merrill Lynch has established information barriers between
BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research and certain business groups. As a result, BofA Merrill Lynch does not disclose certain client relationships with, or compensation received from, such issuers in
research reports. To the extent this report discusses any legal proceeding or issues, it has not been prepared as nor is it intended to express any legal conclusion, opinion or advice. Investors
should consult their own legal advisers as to issues of law relating to the subject matter of this report. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel’s knowledge of legal proceedings in which
any BofA Merrill Lynch entity and/or its directors, officers and employees may be plaintiffs, defendants, co-defendants or co-plaintiffs with or involving issuers mentioned in this report is based
on public information. Facts and views presented in this material that relate to any such proceedings have not been reviewed by, discussed with, and may not reflect information known to,
professionals in other business areas of BofA Merrill Lynch in connection with the legal proceedings or matters relevant to such proceedings.
This report has been prepared independently of any issuer of securities mentioned herein and not in connection with any proposed offering of securities or as agent of any issuer of any
securities. None of MLPF&S, any of its affiliates or their research analysts has any authority whatsoever to make any representation or warranty on behalf of the issuer(s). BofA Merrill Lynch
Global Research policy prohibits research personnel from disclosing a recommendation, investment rating, or investment thesis for review by an issuer prior to the publication of a research
report containing such rating, recommendation or investment thesis.
Any information relating to the tax status of financial instruments discussed herein is not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone to provide tax advice. Investors are urged to
seek tax advice based on their particular circumstances from an independent tax professional.
The information herein (other than disclosure information relating to BofA Merrill Lynch and its affiliates) was obtained from various sources and we do not guarantee its accuracy. This report
may contain links to third-party websites. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsible for the content of any third-party website or any linked content contained in a third-party website. Content
contained on such third-party websites is not part of this report and is not incorporated by reference into this report. The inclusion of a link in this report does not imply any endorsement by or
any affiliation with BofA Merrill Lynch. Access to any third-party website is at your own risk, and you should always review the terms and privacy policies at third-party websites before
submitting any personal information to them. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsible for such terms and privacy policies and expressly disclaims any liability for them.
Certain outstanding reports may contain discussions and/or investment opinions relating to securities, financial instruments and/or issuers that are no longer current. Always refer to the most
recent research report relating to an issuer prior to making an investment decision.
In some cases, an issuer may be classified as Restricted or may be Under Review or Extended Review. In each case, investors should consider any investment opinion relating to such issuer (or
its security and/or financial instruments) to be suspended or withdrawn and should not rely on the analyses and investment opinion(s) pertaining to such issuer (or its securities and/or
financial instruments) nor should the analyses or opinion(s) be considered a solicitation of any kind. Sales persons and financial advisors affiliated with MLPF&S or any of its affiliates may not
solicit purchases of securities or financial instruments that are Restricted or Under Review and may only solicit securities under Extended Review in accordance with firm policies.
Neither BofA Merrill Lynch nor any officer or employee of BofA Merrill Lynch accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential damages or losses arising from any use of
this report or its contents.
26 Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016
Research Analysts
Benjamin Bowler
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
+1 415 676 3595
benjamin.bowler@baml.com
William Chan, CFA >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong)
+852 3508 3921
william.w.chan@baml.com
Clovis Couasnon >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLI (UK)
+44 20 7995 0303
clovis.couasnon@baml.com
Abhinandan Deb >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLI (UK)
+44 20 7995 7148
abhinandan.deb@baml.com
Jason Galazidis >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLI (UK)
+44 20 7996 5713
jason.galazidis@baml.com
Anshul Gupta >>
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLI (UK)
+44 20 7996 7062
agupta113@baml.com
Chintan Kotecha
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
+1 646 855 5478
chintan.kotecha@baml.com
Stefano Pascale
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
+1 646 855 2631
stefano.pascale@baml.com
Nitin Saksena
Equity-Linked Analyst
MLPF&S
+1 646 855 5480
nitin.saksena@baml.com
>> Employed by a non-US affiliate of MLPF&S and is not registered/qualified as a research analyst under the FINRA rules.
Refer to ""Other Important Disclosures"" for information on certain BofA Merrill Lynch entities that take responsibility for
this report in particular jurisdictions.
Global Equity Volatility Insights | 09 August 2016 27
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014903.txt,"eBay (Buy, $38 PO)

Stock view: Marketplace growth should improve in 2017

eBay’s 4Q results showed signs of Marketplace improvement, with improving mobile
and C2C trends and a modest pickup in new buyers. Management expects to put
marketing dollars behind this trend to drive Marketplace growth momentum in 2017
(guidance calls for 1 point of acceleration in Marketplace volume in 1Q, with 2 points for
the full year). Expectations have risen since the start of the year, and we think eBay
needs to deliver 1 point acceleration in US GMV growth vs 1Q to maintain confidence in
management’s execution. There is also significant interest in eBay’s first party ad
strategy and potential improvement in transaction take rates (at expense of MS&O
revenues).

The potential structured data impact also remains top of mind for investors as
structured data will provide the backbone for improving customer search and product
experiences. As of 4Q’16, there are 180mn+ structured data pages v. 100mn+ pages at
the end of 3Q’16. More pages are expected in 2017, which will start to be exposed to
core organic traffic. Management appears confident that the impact of structured data
would increasingly benefit results and that structured data formats will be much more
visible by holiday 2017. Overall, if 1Q results are at/above expectations, we think the
stock will reflect even more optimism on structured data improvement.

For margins, we expect continued pressure in 2017 as the company ramps up marketing
spend and increases its Al capabilities. If the company can manage to accelerate top
line growth through conversion rate improvements, some of the upside may be invested,
limiting 2017 earnings flow through (but benefitting growth in 2018). Therefore, we
think customer, transaction and revenue trends most important for 2017, but lack of
margin flow through could be sentiment headwind for the stock.

Key theme/metric(s) for 1Q: Marketplace growth/outlook

Our model assumes US GMV growth of 3.5% y/y, an 80bps q/q acceleration off an 80ps
easier y/y comp, while we anticipate 6.0% y/y Intl ex-FX GMV growth. US acceleration
(despite a modest Leap Year headwind) is likely needed to maintain increased
management confidence. Our model assumes 8.3% take rate, which is up 10bps y/y and
could be aided by the early transition to 1* party advertising on the site. eBay’s 1Q
revenue guide implies 5% y/y ex-FX growth at the midpoint, while the 2017 revenue
guide calls for 7% ex-FX growth, implying revenue growth acceleration during the year.

Chart 9: eBay quarterly GMV and revenue y/y growth

10%
5%
0%

-5%

-10%
-15%

-20%
1Q15A 2Q15A 3Q15A 4Q15A 1Q16A 2Q16A 3Q16A 4Q16A 1Q17E 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E

===—=Revenue Growth =-==—=GMV Growth

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research estimates, company report

Biggest 1Q issues/risks:
* Overall GMV growth remains muted as structured data changes still early, reducing
confidence in future improvement.

BankofAmerica <2 ; ;
Merrill Lynch Internet/e-Commerce | 06 April2017 17

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014903
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021397.txt,"transcendence and belonging can
simultaneously lead to greater fitness of
the individual and increased cohesion
and sustainability of the social
organization—another indication of
positive selection associated with the
social brain.

The notion of resonance with
another appears repeatedly through the
book. Our connections to others derive
in part from being able to see what they
see, to hear what they hear, to know
what they know, to feel what they feel.
Or we have to be able to believe not only
that this is possible, but that it happens.
The social brain, in which the same
regions are activated by our own
experience of pain and by our perception
of others in pain, makes both aspects
possible. There is a close connection
between being able to “feel for” another
(empathy) and to “see into” another
mind (anthropomorphism).

Language has the potential to
affect people and groups in part because
it is tied to meaning. Language is the
medium through which we convey,
preserve, and transmit meaning from one
individual to another, and from one
social generation to another. Language
is powerful because it can activate
belief, which in turn can activate
physical responses. Words can bind;
words can terrify; and words can cause
physical pain and death. The power of
words comes from the meanings they
entail about our connections to one
another.

Paradox

Our investigation of invisible
forces involving the social brain has led
us repeatedly to factors that
fundamentally conflict. An important
invisible force is the respect we pay to
the boundary between self and other.

151

Page

Our relationship to it comes into play in
conceptualizing loneliness,
anthropomorphism, spirituality, group
behavior, empathy, and inclusive fitness.
When we speak of loneliness, this
boundary seems to be an impenetrable
barrier. When we speak of empathy or
anthropomorphism, however, the self-
other boundary is defined by the
similarity and congruence of individuals
to one another, providing a transparent
window through which we perceive and
interact with others (who must be like
us). And when we speak of group
synchrony, the boundary vanishes
completely: self and other are one.

Successful engagement with
others requires work. It is the work of
attending to something, and it is work
that often is needed to resolve competing
forces. Thinking about other minds is a
demanding task and requires attentional
effort. It is this effort that allows us to
manipulate the transparency of the self-
other boundary by what we put in
through learning, attending, seeking, and
projecting. In effect, we can tune the
degree of resonance we have with
members of different groups. Similarly,
consistent attentional effort is also
required for the physician to attend to
the mindfulness of patients, for the
Vineyard church member to experience
God as present in one’s life, and for
another to find connection to an
omnipresent yet invisible God who
works through the very workings of the
world.

What it means to feel a
connection to a higher being is a theme
that several essays explore. As is
evident in these essays, the Network has
considered very different, even
divergent, pictures of what such
connection might entail. These apparent
inconsistencies that can be found in

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021397
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018976.txt,"Date: 7/13/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Time: 9:27:55 Incident Report Program: CMS301L

Case No. ... : 1-05-000368 (Continued)
attachment file.

Det. Dawson was assigned to relieve Officer Munyan at 4:00 pm; he
informed me that at approximately 8:00 pm, Epstein had left for the
airport and his private jet was sitting on the tarmac. Epstein's
private vehicle drove to the jet and unloaded packages into the jet.
It appeared that Epstein left the county at this time. Surveillance
will continue to determine when Epstein will return.

Inv Continues.

KRKKKKKEREKEKRKEEEEERKEEREKEKEK NARRATIVE HE 3B RRKKKERKKKEKKEKRKEKREKREEREKKER
NA _ Reported By: PARKINSON, GREGORY A. 9/23/05
Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 9/23/05

On Friday, September 23, 2005 at approximately 1:45 p.m., I began to
copy a tape micro cassette, under case number 05-368 and property
number 05-243, tape number 1. I placed the tape in the telex copy-et,
series 2 machine and began to go through the copying process.
Approximately 1/2 through the tape, the tape wrapped around the
spindle and became locked and stretched the tape. I examined it and
determined that it was in the best interest to leave it as it is as a
prior copy had been made and turned over to Sergeant Frick. I
immediately took the tape to Sergeant Frick and allowed him to examine
it and then obtained the copy from him and Detective Recarey and
brought the copy of the tape down and made a copy for him based on
that. The tape was placed back in the original container and is
retained in the evidence bag under the previously mentioned property
number of 05-243. It is not advisable to attempt to copy this tape as
further damage could result to the recorded material and there is an
existing copy anyway.

KEKEKKKEKEEKKEREEEEEEREKEEEEE NARRATIVE He RK KKKRKEKKKEKREREEKEEEREREREEK
NA Reported By: PARKINSON, GREGORY A. 9/26/05
Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 9/26/05

On 3-24-05 at 11:00 pm, a copy of tape 2 (case number 05-294) had been
made for Det. Pagan by Evidence Specialist Annette Badger. The copy
was turned over to Detective Recarey.

On Friday, 09-23-05 at approimately 2:15 pm, I was in the process of
reproducing audio tapes (micro and standard) to standard size when it
was discovered, in the test review process, that tape number 2 was
blank. I notified Sgt. Frick and Det. Recarey. I was informed that
they had a prior copy and I could use it to make a master tape. I did
so and when reviewing and signing the evidence sheet, I noticed
Evidence Specialist Badger had written ""#2 is blank.""

I obtained that copy from Det. Recarey and made a new copy on a .
standard size tape. The new copy was placed in the evidence bag under

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018976

"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032064.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 10/9/2016 1:07:24 AM 
To: Kathy Ruemmler Darren lndyke Martin Weinberg 
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/ 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032064 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014392.txt,"US - Banks Coverage Cluster

BofA Merrill Lynch

Investment rating Company ticker Bloomberg symbol Analyst
BUY
BankUnited, Inc. BKU BKU US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
BB&T Corporation BBT BBT US Erika Najarian
Capital Bank Financial Corp. CBF CBF US Erika Najarian
Citigroup Inc. C CUS Erika Najarian
Citizens Financial Group CFG CFG US Erika Najarian
East West Bancorp, Incorporated EWBC EWBC US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
FCB Financial Holdings, Inc FCB FCB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Great Western Bancorp Inc GWB GWB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Huntington Bancshares Inc. HBAN HBAN US Erika Najarian
IBERIABANK Corp IBKC IBKC US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPM JPM US Erika Najarian
Key Corp KEY KEY US Erika Najarian
New York Community Bancorp NYCB NYCB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Signature Bank SBNY SBNY US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
SunTrust Banks, Inc. STl STIUS Erika Najarian
SVB Financial Group SIVB SIVB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC PNC US Erika Najarian
UMB Financial Corporation UMBF UMBF US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Wells Fargo & Company WFC WEC US Erika Najarian
NEUTRAL
Banc of California BANC BANC US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Commerce Bancshares Inc. CBSH CBSH US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Fifth Third Bank FITB FITB US Erika Najarian
First Bancorp Puerto Rico FBP FBP US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
First Hawaiian Inc. FHB FHB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Franklin Financial Network, Inc. FSB FSB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Hancock Holding HBHC HBHC US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
M&T Bank MTB MTB US Erika Najarian
Regions Financial RF RF US Erika Najarian
Synovus Financial Corp. SNV SNV US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Texas Capital Bancshares Inc. TCBI TCBI US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
U.S. Bancorp USB USB US Erika Najarian
UNDERPERFORM
Associated Banc-Corp ASB ASB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Bank of Hawaii Corp. BOH BOH US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Comerica Incorporated CMA CMA US Erika Najarian
Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc CFR CFRUS Ebrahim H. Poonawala
First Horizon National Corp. FHN FHN US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Prosperity Bancshares Inc PB PBUS Ebrahim H. Poonawala
TCF Financial Corp. TCB TCB US Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Zions Bancorp ZION ZION US Erika Najarian
RSTR
First Republic Bank FRC FRC US Erika Najarian
Disclosures

Important Disclosures

Equity Investment Rating Distribution: Banks Group (as of 30 Sep 2016)

Coverage Universe Count Percent Inv. Banking Relationships* Count Percent

Buy 81 43.55% Buy 74 91.36%

Hold 45 24.19% Hold 4 91.11%

Sell 60 32.26% Sell 56 93.33%

78 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 Bankof America >
Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014392
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011052.txt,"All studies of human capital, as far as I know, effectively treat human depreciation as
deadweight loss. Ben-Porath’s model seems no exception. How does he model pay?
He multiplies human capital by a productivity factor, and then again by the fraction
marketed for pay rather than self-invested. That gives what I call realized work. Pay,
if] am right, measures gross realized work. That is the main amendment I would

propose for his model.

Ben-Porath’s first three equations summarize what I call the growth truism (6.14).

In my terms, not his, he models

human growth = invested consumption + self-invested work
— human depreciation.

He means positive self-invested work in the form of learning. Meanwhile the
inalienability of human capital leaves its depreciation as its only avenue of
decapitalization. Invested consumption corresponds to gross transfer in as meant in
the growth truism (6.14c) while self-invested work is the same as proprietary

output. Then (6.4c) applied to human capital could show as

human growth = invested consumption + positive self-invested work
— human depreciation,
= invested consumption + self-invested work
— recovered human depreciation,

confirming (5.2) and (5.3a).

Logic also seems to agree with Ben-Porath’s interpretation that self- invested work
continues late into careers, and that it must stop when time for recovery runs out.
But I would specify that invested consumption stops, for modeling purposes, at full-

time job entry or a little later to allow for initial job training.

This needn’t follow from my adjusted axioms. It’s just an impression from what | see.
I don’t agree with Schultz that outlays on medicine or worker relocation are

investment. I see them as maintenance consumption preserving skills, not

Chapter 6: Parallels with the Firm 2/4/16 18

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011052
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020231.txt,"ao

minute video on encryption (which might have been the same video he used at his Crypto party a
few weeks earlier.)

Greenwald did not manage to encrypt his computer, however. Snowden, unwilling to deal with
Greenwald through an unencrypted channel, broke off contact with him in January 2013. Even
so, he did not give up his plan of using Greenwald in his enterprise. He sought an intermediary
who used encryption.

The alternative route to Greenwald that Snowden chose was Laura Poitras. He knew she had
am association with him. They both were founding board members of the Freedom of the Press
Foundation. Greenwald had also written about her extensively. For example, he wrote an entire
blog about her confrontation with the US government and her plans to make a documentary about
the “U.S. Government’s increasing powers of domestic surveillance [through] its expanding
covert domestic NSA activities”

Since 2011, Poitras had been filming the construction of a massive NSA repository for data in
Bluffdale, Utah. In the anti-surveillance culture, the structure had become symbolic of the powers
of the NSA. In fact, was the same NSA site that Parker Higgins photographed from a blimp in the
fall of 2013 and post on the Internet. Just six months earlier in August 2012, Poitras had
released her documentary about the NSA’s use of the Bluffdale repository for domestic spying,

Aside from her connections with Greenwald, Poitras had other impressive credentials. Born in
1964 in Boston, She came from a wealthy family that donated large sums of money to
philanthropic causes, including $20 million for research on bipolar disorders. After graduating
from the New School for Public Engagement in 1996, she pursued a career as an activist film-
maker. Her focus quickly became exposing NSA’s surveillance. One of her short documentaries
about the NSA’s domestic surveillance program was featured on the New York Times website and
attracted enormous attention in 2012. As a dedicated opponent of the surveillance state, she
participated in public events with William Binney, the now famous ex-NSA whistle-blower, and
Jacob Appelbaum. In April 2012, for example, she made a presentation at the Whitney Museum
in New York with Binney and Appelbaum. She became such a leading activist against the NSA
by December 2012 that Appelbaum, after lauding her work, interspersed clips from her short film
in his keynote address at the Computer Chaos Club convention of hacktavists in Berlin in
December 2012. Snowden also closely followed her rise in this world. By simply googling
Poitras’ name in January 2013, he would have learned about her connections with Greenwald,
Appelbaum, Binney, Assange and other leading figures in the anti-surveillance camp. When asked
later Snowden why he had chosen her to help him, He replied “I didn’t. You chose yourself.” The
problem for Snowden was anonymously drawing her in to his enterprise.

Poitras was living in Berlin in January 2013, which made her vulnerable to NSA surveillance.
To get to her through an encrypted channel, Snowden chose a circuitous approach. On January
11, 2013, he wrote to Micah Lee in Berkeley, California. Unlike Greenwald and Poitras, Lee

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020231
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031335.txt,"From: ee
Sent: 6/18/2011 2:59:52 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Importance: — High

DOMINQUE STRAUSS-KAHN ARRESTED, NOT BECAUSE HE RAPED A MAID, BUT
BECAUSE HE HAD EVIDENCE US HAS NO GOLD IN FORT KNOX.

Posted by admin on Jun 3, 2011 in News | 0 comments

A startling story published by the European Union Times, could be the one of the worlds biggest conspiracy theories, a plot for a movie or a
frightening scenario for the U.S. and world economy.

Dominique Strauss Kahn

According to the on-line publication a new report prepared for Russian Prime Minister Putin by the FederalSecurity Service(FSB) says that
former International Monetary Fund (IMF) ChiefDominique Strauss-Kahnwas charged and jailed in the US forsex crimeson May 14 after his
discovery that all of thegoldheld in theUnited States Bullion Depositorylocated at Fort Knox was missing and/or unaccounted for.

According to this FSBsecretreport, Strauss-Kahn had become increasingly concerned earlier this month after the United States began stalling
its pledged delivery to the IMF of 191.3 tons of goldagreed to under theSecond Amendmentof the Articles of Agreement signed by the
Executive Board in April 1978 that were to be sold to fund what are called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as an alternative to what are called
reserve currencies.

This FSB report says that when Strauss-Kahn raised his concerns with Americangovernment officials close to President Obama he was
contacted by rogue elements within the CIA who provided him firm evidence that all of thegoldreported to be held by the US was gone.
Upon Strauss-Kahn receiving the CIA evidence, the report said, he made immediate arrangements to leave the US for Paris, but when
contacted by agents working for Frances General Directorate for External Security (DGSE) that American authorities were seeking his
capture he fled to New York CitysJFK airportfollowing these agents directive not to take his cell-phone because US police could track his
exact location.

Once Strauss-Kahn safely boarded anAir France flightto Paris, the FSB report says, he made a fatal mistake by calling the hotel from a phone
on the plane and asking them to forwarded the cell-phone he had been told to leave behind to his French residence, after which US agents
were able to track and apprehend him.

Within the past fortnight, the report continues, Strauss-Kahn reached out to his close friend and top Egyptian banker Mahmoud Abdel Salam
Omar to retrieve from the US the evidence given to him by the CIA. Omar, however, and exactly like Strauss-Kahn before him, has been
chargedby the US with a sex crime against aluxury hotelmaid, a charge the FSB labels as beyond belief as Omar is 74-years-old and a devout
Muslim.

In an astounding move puzzling many in Moscow, Putin after reading thissecretFSB report ordered posted to the Kremlins official website a
defense of Strauss-Khan becoming thefirst world leader to state that the former IMF chief was a victim of a US conspiracy.

One of the United States top Congressman, and 2012 Presidential candidate, Ron Paul has long stated his belief that the US government has
lied about itsgoldreserves held at Fort Knox. And in 2010 put forward a bill force an audit of them, .The bill was defeated, but which was
subsequently defeated by Obama regime forces.

When directly asked by reporters if he believed there was nogoldin Fort Knox or the Federal Reserve, Congressman Paul gave the incredible
reply, | think it is a possibility.

Also interesting to note is that barely 3 days after the arrest of Strauss-Kahn, Congressman Paul made a new call for the US to sell
itsgoldreserves by stating, Given the high price it is now, and the tremendous debt problem we now have, by all means, sell at the peak.
Reports emanating from the US for years, however, suggest there is nogoldto sell.

New reports coming from the United States show his determination not to go down without a fight as he has hired what is described as a
crack team of former CIA spies, private investigators and media advisers to defend him.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031335
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032484.txt,"Sent: 2/16/2017 12:07:16 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Trump

Importance: — High

On Feb 1, 2017, at 7:39 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

the allegation was not at a pedophile party, it was at my house with me.

to what wording would you suggest I change that?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032484
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019498.txt,"10 | HOW AMERICA LOST ITS SECRETS

Snowden’s whereabouts are clouded—the period between the time
he left the Mira hotel on June 10 and the day he left Hong Kong for
Russia on June 23. When I asked my consulate source whether the
U.S. mission took any action to track Snowden during these thirteen
days, he explained that the FBI had long maintained a contingent
of “legal attachés” based at the consulate to pursue many possible
violations of U.S. law including video piracy. In addition, the CIA
and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) had retained a handful of
“China watchers” under diplomatic cover in Hong Kong. This group
constituted the “intelligence mission,” as he referred to it. It had
developed informal relations with the Hong Kong police that, along
with the NSA’s electronic capabilities abroad, allowed it to track
Snowden’s movements after he had outed himself on the video.
Because Snowden, his lawyers, and the journalists in his entourage
frequently used their cell phones to text one another, it was fairly
easy for the U.S. intelligence mission to follow Snowden’s trail after
he left the Mira hotel. He said that the Hong Kong police also knew
where he was during this period. My source further suggested that
© the massive Chinese intelligence contingent in Hong Kong also ©
knew, because it had close relations with the Hong Kong police.

“So everyone knew Snowden’s whereabouts as he moved every
few days from apartment to apartment,” I interjected. He answered
that it was no secret to anyone except the media and the public. “Of
course we knew,” he said, adding that there were also photographs
of Snowden entering the office building that housed the Russian
consulate. I mentioned that there was a report in a Russian newspa-
per that Snowden had visited the Russian consulate in late June in
connection with the flight he later took to Moscow. “All we know is
he entered the building,” he answered, with a shrug.

That Russian consulate visit did not come as a complete surprise
to U.S. intelligence. After Snowden left the Mira, his interactions
with the Russian and Chinese intelligence services in Hong Kong
had been closely monitored by “secret means,” a term that in that
context likely indicated electronic surveillance. A former top intel-
ligence executive in Washington, D.C., subsequently confirmed this
monitoring to me. All of Snowden’s stealth in exiting from the Mira
hotel, which included wearing a baseball cap and dark glasses, thus

| | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 10 ® 9/29/16 5:51 Pa | |

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019498
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029133.txt,"On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Robert Kuhn i wrote:
‘Blahblahs’ forbidden in ""Radical Breakthroughs’. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science
and Rare Sentience).

Initial ideas:

* Expand the first episode “Mathematics and Truth” into two or likely three episodes. I’m intrigued by this
because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner’s
‘unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)’, astrophysics, cosmology, biology,
general systems theory. I’ve felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think
three episodes could work - if you agree, I’ll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3
parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277
episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the
series.

* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un
of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.

* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my
expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you

need to tell me if you would like to include this.

* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability
in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

https://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/625 1/aac4716

“Replicability vs. Reproducibility” - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-
science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html

Five Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].

* Other possibile areas you suggest

We would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth ‘season’
of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs’, which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin
2018.

See you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.

Robert

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029133
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012913.txt,"Contents xvii

12 The Engineering and Development of Ethics..........................005. 205
121 JPOAWMEtIOH, «205 sa2ms emees Cees ENNeS LE SMES MEME OEMS SERS EME!s dees em; 205
12.2 Review of Current Thinking on the Risks of AGI ................ 00.0002 eee 206
12.3 The Value of an Explicit Goal System. ....... 0.0... eee ee ee 209
12.4 Ethical Synergy ...... 0.00. eee eee tenet eae 210

12.4.1 Stages of Development of Declarative Ethics .................2..000005 211
12.4.2 Stages of Development of Empathic Ethics .....................2.2-- 214
12.4.3 An Integrative Approach to Ethical Development..................... 215
12.4.4 Integrative Ethics and Integrative AGI ...................0 0. eee eee 216
12.5 Clarifying the Ethics of Justice: Extending the Golden Rule in to a
Multifactorial Ethical Model ..........0..000 000 cc eee eee 219
12.5.1 The Golden Rule and the Stages of Ethical Development ............. 222
12.5.2 The Need for Context-Sensitivity and Adaptiveness in Deploying
Ethical Principles .......0.0.000 0000 ec eee eee 223
12.6 The Ethical Treatment of AGIs ..........0...0 000 c cece ee 226
12.6.1 Possible Consequences of Depriving AGIs of Freedom ................. 228
12.6.2 AGI Ethics as Boundaries Between Humans and AGIs Become Blurred . 229
12.7 Possible Benefits of Closely Linking AGIs to the Global Brain................ 230
12.7.1 The Importance of Fostering Deep, Consensus-Building Interactions
Between People with Divergent Views............... 00.0: e ee eee 231
12.8 Possible Benefits of Creating Societies of AGIS ........... 00. cece eee eee 233
12.9 AGI Ethics As Related to Various Future Scenarios ................00 00 eee 234
12.9.1 Capped Intelligence Scenarios ...........00.. 0000 eects 234
12.9.2 Superintelligent AI: Soft-Takeoff Scenarios ................0 0020.00 e eee 235
12.9.3 Superintelligent AI: Hard-Takeoff Scenarios .................2.000005 235
12.9.4 Global Brain Mindplex Scenarios ..............0.0..00 000 eee eee 237
12.10Conclusion: Eight Ways to Bias AGI Toward Friendliness.................... 239
12.10.1 Encourage Measured Co-Advancement of AGI Software and AGI Ethics
TDCOLY +s esos WES UES URES UR ERISA CREE CRESS ERERG BAERS BRESS Bret 241
12.10.2Develop Advanced AGI Sooner Not Later .................0..002205- 241

Section IV Networks for Explicit and Implicit Knowledge Representation

13 Local, Global and Glocal Knowledge Representation...................... 245
13.1 Introduction ..........000 0002 eens 245
13.2 Localized Knowledge Representation using Weighted, Labeled Hypergraphs .... 246

13.2.1 Weighted, Labeled Hypergraphs............... 0000: c eee eee eee eee 246
13.3 Atoms: Their Types and Weights ............ 0.00. cee cee eee eee eee 247
13.3.1 Some Basic Atom Types .......... 0.0.00 eee eee 247
13.3.2 Variable Atoms ..........0 000000 cee teen ee 249
13.368 Logical Links o3 casms ease ones os oWams EW EMS EWES ERS BREE BREWS Bm: 251
13.3.4 Temporal Links ..........00 0.00000 tenes 252
13.3.5 Associative Links... 0.2.0.0... 0000 eee ee 253
13.3.6 Procedure Nodes .........00..00 00 cette eee 254
13.3.7 Links for Special External Data Types ..............0 002.00 eee eee eee 254
13.3.8 Truth Values and Attention Values ........... 0.00.00 eee eee eee eee 255
13.4 Knowledge Representation via Attractor Neural Networks ................... 256

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012913
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030462.txt,"Date: Tuesday, March 8 2011 08:48 PM

Subject: Re:

From: —_Lesley Groff <a’ >

To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>;
thank you Vicky!

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com > wrote:

Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <

http://www. vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-
couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html>

by Vicky Ward <http:/\vww.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-_ ward>

March 8, 2011, 2:30 PM

“lve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never
think the same way about anything again.”

So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment
as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.

Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another
investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested
them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s
friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.

I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his
mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited
Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail
sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.

The piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had
sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how
Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.

This is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing
financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-
chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he?
And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, Iam so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all,
my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.

Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. [kept running into both of
them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two
feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” [remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He
laughed. “Not like vou, Vicky,” was his riposte.

Iremembered that when we’d once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math
since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a
book: “Math for idiots.”

So he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.

“Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,” newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly

preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and
you know this to be true.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030462
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033352.txt,"From: Richard Kahn 
Sent: 4/28/2019 9:09:20 AM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: The potential lie that could actually destroy Trump 
Importance: High 
https://theweek.com/articles/837793/potential-lie-that-could-actually-destroy-trump 
Richard Kahn 
HBRK Associates Inc. 
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor 
New York, NY 10022 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033352 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020219.txt,"67

This 2012 theft was made even more serious by the interconnection of NSA computers with
those of other intelligence agencies. It will be recalled that prior to the 9/11 attack in 2001, NSA
data had been protected by “stove-piping” that separated NSA’ computers from networks used by
other intelligence services. After the 9/11 Commission concluded that part of the reason why US
intelligence agencies were unable to “connect the dots” in advance of the attack was because this
“stove-piping, the NSA stripped away a large part of its “stove-piping.” One result was that the
NSANet, which Snowden had access to at Dell in 2012, became a shared network. It had
common access points. General Hayden described them to me as the equivalent of “reading
rooms” in a library. They served as a means for NSA workers to exchange ideas about the
problems they were encountering on various projects for the intelligence community. In
maintaining them, system administrators, or “system admins,” like Snowden acted as the
“librarians.” If a stem administrator copied data from this network, no one knew.

For Snowden, the NSANet, which included CIA and Defense Department documents,
provided a rich hunting ground for Snowden in the fall and winter of 2012. Many of the
documents he took off the NSANet revealed not only operations of the NSA but also those of the
CIA and Pentagon. By taking them he had come to a Rubicon from which there would be no
return. He later explained in an email to Vanity Fair from Moscow, “I crossed that line.”

As far as is known, he was not sharing them with any other party prior to May 2013. He was
not even yet in contact with Poitras, Greenwald or any other journalists. Presumably, Snowden
was collecting them drives, despite the risks that possessing such a collection of secrets might
entail, for some future use.

But why would Snowden jeopardize his career and, if caught, his freedom, by undertaking this
illicit enterprise? He may have had by now strong ideological objections the NSA’s global
surveillance. As he said later in Moscow, “we’re subverting our security standards for the sake of
surveillance.” But ordinarily even ideologically-opposed employees don’t steal state secrets and
risk imprisonment. If they are disgruntled, they seek employment elsewhere. Certainly,
Snowden, with his three years experience working for Dell, would have little problem finding a
job as an IT worker in the booming civilian sector of computer technology. Instead of resigning,
he sought to widen his access to NSA documents. This behavior suggests to me that he had
another agenda. One possible clue to it is the first document he took; the NSA exam. The secret
in that document, the answers to the questions, were a form of power to him: power to burrow
deeper into the executive structure of the NSA. It would unlock the door to door to even the
more powerful documents containing the NSA’s sources stored in Level 3 compartments. His
later actions demonstrated that he equated the possession of such secrets with personal power.
For example, after he arrived in Moscow in 2013, he bragged to James Risen of the New York
Times that he had access to secrets that gave him great leverage over the NSA. He told him
specifically his access to “full lists” of NSA’s agents and operation in adversary countries could,
if revealed, closed down the NSA’s capabilities to gather information in them.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020219
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018786.txt,"Gaming Supply Analysis

The following table presents an overview of the competitive themed Casino Resort properties as of year-end 2014 operating within the Las

Vegas Strip submarket. These properties contained 33,505 gaming devices and 1,979 table games.

COMPETITIVE SUMMARY
CASINO OWNER

SLS Las Vegas
The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas
Bally’s Casino Resort

Stockbridge
Blackstone Group
Caesars Entertainment

Bellagio MGM Resorts International
Caesars Palace Caesars Entertainment

Aria MGM Resorts International
Excalibur MGM Resorts International

Flamingo Hilton Caesars Entertainment
Harrah’s Las Vegas Caesars Entertainment
Luxor MGM Resort International
Mandalay Bay MGM Resort International
MGM Grand MGM Resort International
Mirage MGM Resort International
Monte Carlo MGM Resort International
New York-New York MGM Resort International
Palace Station Station Casinos

Palms George Maloof

Paris Caesars Entertainment
Planet Hollywood Caesars Entertainment
Riviera Riviera Holding Corp.
Treasure Island Phil Ruffin

Tropicana Resort and Casino Onex Corp.

Venetian/Palazzo
Wynn/Encore

Las Vegas Sands, Inc.
Wynn Resorts

ROOMS

1,613
2,960
2,814
3,933
3,340
4,004
3,991
3,565
2,526
4,408
4,332
5,001
3,044
3,213
2,024
1,028
703
2,916
2,496
2,072
2,885
1,878
7,095
4,750

CASINO
SQUARE FOOTAGE

54,000
110,000
66,187
159,734
136,573
200,544
89,074
61,000
90,041
100,000
160,344
161,675
95,900
102,207
64,269
84,000
55,689
95,195
116,000
103,800
55,680
62,011
138,684

109,900

CASINO SF
PER ROOM

33.5
37.2
23.5
40.6
40.9
50.1
22.3
17.1
35.6
22.7
37.0
32.3
31.5
31.8
31.8
81.7
79.2
32.6
46.5
50.1
19.3
33.0
19.5
23.1

GAMING TABLE
DEVICES GAMES
806 77
1,360 124
999 58
1,977 110
1,265 98
1,726 101
1,202 72
1,100 100
1,206 85
1,250 75
1,500 90
1,850 98
1,760 80
1,400 55
1,350 51
1,713 37
1,317 45
1,014 77
1,095 71
1,000 30
1,335 61
892 40
2,287 185

2,101 159

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018786
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030304.txt,"But a state grand jury found the witnesses in the case were not credible and threw out all
but the single charge of soliciting a hooker in his luxurious Palm Beach home. Epstein's
lawyers and friends now say he's the hapless victim of a vendetta by Palm Beach Police
Chief Michael Reiter, whom they describe as a ""born-again nut case.""

According to the police investigation, a copy of which was obtained by the Palm Beach
Post, detectives took statements from 17 witnesses and five alleged victims. Haley
Robson, 20, a Palm Beach Community College student who described herself as ""like a
Heidi Fleiss,"" says she got naked to give Epstein a massage, then brought him six girls
ages 14-16 for massages and sex at his home. She said they were paid $200 per session.
Cops also allege that Epstein's personal assistant, Sarah Kellen, who hasn't been charged,
set up the liaisons and put fresh sheets on the massage table and supplied massage oils.
Police searched through Epstein's garbage and retrieved sex toys and feminine hygiene
products.

Epstein's Palm Beach lawyer, Jack Goldberger, told Page Six that the Florida state
attorney concluded the cops had looked at evidence from a ""one-sided perspective."" He
added that Epstein had passed an extensive lie-detector test in which he was grilled about
underage girls.

Epstein's New York lawyer, Gerald Lefcourt, said, ""The prosecutor didn't want to bring
any charges in this case, but because of the craziness of this police chief, we have the
charge of solicitation.""

Last night, WPTV in Palm Beach reported that one reason Robson's testimony may have
been dismissed is the kinky Web page she has on MySpace featuring photos of her
female friends playing with sex toys. One friend even uses the name ""Pimpin' Made EZ.""
Robson, who isn't charged, also writes, ""Do what you do to make that money, life is

a gamble. Stay hustling.”

A spokeswoman for Reiter said, ""We think our investigation speaks for itself.""

Cops also allege that [Jeffrey Epstein]'s personal assistant, Sarah Kellen, who hasn't been
charged, set up the liaisons and put fresh sheets on the massage table and supplied
massage oils. Police searched through Epstein's garbage and retrieved sex toys and
feminine hygiene products.

Epstein's Palm Beach lawyer, Jack Goldberger, told Page Six that the Florida state
attorney concluded the cops had looked at evidence from a ""one-sided perspective."" He
added that Epstein had passed an extensive lie-detector test in which he was grilled about
underage girls.

NewYork Post — 09/20/2007

JAIL LOOMS FOR SEX-CASE MOGUL

September 20, 2007 -- THE sordid sex case involving Jeffrey Epstein may

be coming to an unhappy ending -with a plea deal that would put the

publicity-shy billionaire behind bars for 15 months for allegedly soliciting

underage teen girls for sex at his Palm Beach mansion.

Sources tell Page Six that Epstein’s high-powered lawyers - including Alan

Dershowitz, Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black and Kenneth Starr - have been

negotiating a deal with federal prosecutors who are probing, among other

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030304
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033434.txt,"﻿10:01 .111'+' Cl, 
<0 
Edwards> 
iMessage 
Today 8:28 AM 
You're in the press 
almost as much as 
President Trump! 
No shit. I get called 
every day to ""verify 
something Jack said."" I 
don't have time for this 
nonsense. The recusal 
was such a non-event. 
Ridiculous. 
CN 0 
Delivered 
!Message 
e 
L 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030385.txt,"Date: Sunday, January 15 2017 02:16 PM 
Subject: Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the `S.N.L.' Treatment 
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation©gmail.com> 
To: Glenn Dubin 111=11>; 
saw it loved it 
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Glenn Dubin < 
> wrote: 
http://www.nytimes .com/2017/ 01/15/arts/donald- trump- saturday-night-live . html? smpro d=nytc ore-  ip ad 
&smid=nytcore-ipad-share  
The actor Alec Baldwin, in a parody of Mr. Trump's first news conference as president-elect, began by vowing 
to answer what he said was ""the question that's on everyone's mind."" 
Scnt from my iPad 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030385 
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017942.txt,"Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 8 of 28

defamatory statements were made, and abuse occurred, within the Southern District of New
York.
26. Venue is proper in this Court as (a) the cause of action arose within the

jurisdiction of this Court and (b) Defendant resides within this District.

PARTIES
27.  Plaintiffis an individual who is a citizen of the State of Florida and a resident of
Australia.
28. Defendant Dershowitz is an individual who resides in the Southern District of

New York at 2 Tudor City Place Apt. lOEN, New York, New York 10017.

29. Jeffrey Epstein is an individual who resides in the Southern District of New York
at 9 East 71°' Street, New York, New York, 10021.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
A. Epstein’s Sex Trafficking Enterprise

30. Plaintiff became a victim of sex trafficking and repeated sexual abuse after being
recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein when Plaintiff was under the age of
eighteen.

31. Between 2000 and 2002, Epstein sexually abused Roberts at numerous locations
including his mansions in West Palm Beach, Florida, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands, and this
District. Epstein also flew Roberts on his plane nationally and internationally numerous times
when she was under the age of 18. Only portions of the flight logs of Epstein’s private planes
are yet known, and Epstein also flew Roberts frequently on commercial airlines to meet him and
others. However, the chart below which shows Roberts’ flights on Epstein’s private plane from

the limited logs that are available illustrates the international scope of Epstein’s sex trafficking.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017942
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031453.txt,"constitute inside information, and is intended only for

the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.h

tml

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031453
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016484.txt,"SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION — FIRST DEPARTMENT

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK, : App. Div. No. 6081

Respondent, ; On Appeal from New York Supreme Court,
: New York County, Index No. 30129/10
~ against - (Pickholz, J.)
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION BY NYP HOLDINGS, INC TO UNSEAL APPELLATE BRIEFS

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Robert D. Balin

John M. Browning

1251 Avenue of the Americas, 21st Floor
New York, New York 10020-1104
Telephone: (212) 603-6410

Counsel for Non-Party Movant NYP
Holdings, Inc.

4811-372 1-9459y.3 3930033-000039

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016484
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030995.txt,"Now, there are 1,211,998 people in prisons.

That leaves just two people to do the work.

You and me.

And there you are,

Sitting on your chair,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030995
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022599.txt,"97

(B) Any domestic concern that is not a natural person and that vio-
lates subsection (a) or (i) of this section shall be subject to a civil pen-
alty of not more than $10,000 imposed in an action brought by the
Attorney General.

(2)(A) Any natural person that is an officer, director, employee, or
agent of a domestic concern, or stockholder acting on behalf of such
domestic concern, who willfully violates subsection (a) or (i) of this
section shall be fined not more than $100,000 or imprisoned not

more than 5 years, or both.

(B) Any natural person that is an officer, director, employee, or agent
of a domestic concern, or stockholder acting on behalf of such domes-
tic concern, who violates subsection (a) or (i) of this section shall be
subject to a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 imposed in an

action brought by the Attorney General.

(3) Whenever a fine is imposed under paragraph (2) upon any officer,
director, employee, agent, or stockholder of a domestic concern, such

fine may not be paid, directly or indirectly, by such domestic concern.
(h) Definitions

For purposes of this section:

(1) The term “domestic concern” means—

(A) any individual who is a citizen, national, or resident of the United

States; and

(B) any corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company,
business trust, unincorporated organization, or sole proprietorship
which has its principal place of business in the United States, or which
is organized under the laws of a State of the United States or a terri-

tory, possession, or commonwealth of the United States.

(2)(A) The term “foreign official” means any officer or employee of
a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality
thereof, or of a public international organization, or any person act-
ing in an ofhcial capacity for or on behalf of any such government or
department, agency, or instrumentality, or for or on behalf of any such

public international organization.

B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “public international

organization” means—

i) an organization that has been designated by Executive order pursu-
ant to Section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act
22 US.C. § 288); or

ii) any other international organization that is designated by the
President by Executive order for the purposes of this section, effective

as of the date of publication of such order in the Federal Register.

3)(A) A person’s state of mind is “knowing” with respect to conduct,
a circumstance, or a result if—

i) such person is aware that such person is engaging in such conduct,
that such circumstance exists, or that such result is substantially cer-
tain to occur; or

ii) such person has a firm belief that such circumstance exists or that

such result is substantially certain to occur.

B) When knowledge of the existence of a particular circumstance
is required for an offense, such knowledge is established if a person
is aware of a high probability of the existence of such circumstance,
unless the person actually believes that such circumstance does not

exist.

4)(A) The term “routine governmental action” means only an action
which is ordinarily and commonly performed by a foreign ofhcial in—
i) obtaining permits, licenses, or other official documents to qualify a
person to do business in a foreign country;

ii) processing governmental papers, such as visas and work orders;
iii) providing police protection, mail pick-up and delivery, or sched-
uling inspections associated with contract performance or inspections
related to transit of goods across country;

iv) providing phone service, power and water supply, loading and
unloading cargo, or protecting perishable products or commodities
from deterioration; or

v) actions of a similar nature.

B) The term “routine governmental action” does not include any
decision by a foreign official whether, or on what terms, to award
new business to or to continue business with a particular party, or
any action taken by a foreign official involved in the decision-making
process to encourage a decision to award new business to or continue

business with a particular party.

(5) The term “interstate commerce” means trade, commerce, transpor-
tation, or communication among the several States, or between any
foreign country and any State or between any State and any place or
ship outside thereof, and such term includes the intrastate use of —
A) atelephone or other interstate means of communication, or

B) any other interstate instrumentality.

i) Alternative Jurisdiction

1) It shall also be unlawful for any United States person to corruptly
do any act outside the United States in furtherance of an offer, pay-
ment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment of any money,
or offer, gift, promise to give, or authorization of the giving of any-
thing of value to any of the persons or entities set forth in paragraphs
(1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a), for the purposes set forth therein,
irrespective of whether such United States person makes use of the
mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce in fur-

therance of such offer, gift, payment, promise, or authorization.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022599

"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023687.txt,"16 Wednesday March 21, 2018

FORUM

GLOBAL
TIMES

CPC-led system a political innovation

Editor’s Note:

The Two Sessions, the annual meet-
ings of China’s top legislative and
advisory bodies, have been under
global spotlight for the past few
weeks. This year’s Two Sessions

are of extraordinary importance as
they have adopted the constitutional
amendments, restructured govern-
ment institutions and elected the new
national leadership. To understand
what the institutional changes mean
for China’s future, as well as the
policy agenda for the coming year,
Global Times (GT) Washington-
based correspondent Hu Zexi talked
‘o Dr. Robert Lawrence Kuhn (Kuhn)
who is a long-time China observer,
and author and editor of over 25
books. Kuhn has been invited to Bei-
jing to take a closer look at this year’s
Two Sessions.

GT: What kind of policy issues are

you following during the Two Ses-
sions?

Kuhn: The proposed amendments

to the Constitution of the People’s
Republic of China give a road map

of areas deemed critical. Several

of the provisions strengthen the
stability, continuity and robustness of
governance. Beyond these, I looked for
any deviations from expectations, for
example, on State-owned enterprise
reform or local government financing.
I also looked for any reaction to the
increased push-back against China’s
rising global capabilities from certain
countries.

GT: In recent years, the Chinese govern-
ment has made more efforts to make
Two Sessions’ agenda better meet public
expectations. For example, the govern-
ment will cooperate with media websites
to conduct surveys
about top policy areas
that the public wants
the Two Sessions to
address. How do you
evaluate such efforts?
Kuhn: Irrespective of the nature of the
political system or ideology, transpar-
ency in governance is the best way for
government to deliver effective, ef-
ficient programs, and enhance credibil-
ity. The Chinese government has been
striving to increase transparency, which
deserves praise.

The Two Sessions are a vehicle for
the government to communicate with
the people and engage them through
media in dealing with all the critical
issues.

GT: How do you see the political belief
of China that democracy should meet the
real or fundamental needs of the public?
Kuhn: Government performance and
democracy are not the same.

The former is indeed assessed by
alleviating poverty, reducing pollution,
improving healthcare and the like.
Democracy is the public participation of
common people in the complex process
of governance.

Thus, true democracy is much
broader than one-person-one-vote.

It includes, primarily, the capacity to
provide substantive input on complex

issues and to provide oversight in the
management of officials.

GT: China for long has argued that
democracy or any other political mecha-
nism should be developed on the basis
of a country’s specific condition. How do
you see this belief, as well as its practice?
Kuhn: Certainly, political systems dif-
fer, even between countries that have
the same ideology. Nonetheless, there
are great commonalities in the goals
and objectives shared by all countries
and people. I suspect that over time,
measured in not less than decades and
perhaps even centuries, there will be

a convergence of
systems toward
what I call with a
smile, “Optimiza-
tionism” — leaders,
officials, executives
making myriad decisions every day to
optimize outcomes without thinking of
the ideology.

GT: There’s talk about China’s unique
system of multiparty cooperation and
political consultation led by the Com-
munist Party of China (CPC) during the
Two Sessions. How do you observe this
system?

Kuhn: The benefits of a one-party-rule
are apparent: the coherence of policies,
rapid decision-making and formula-
tion of strategies that require long-term
consistency for long-term commitment.
But all systems of governance have
trade-offs, and two challenges of one-
party-rule are assuring that all rational
points of view, including dissenting
ones, are included in the decision-mak-
ing process; and systemic checks and
balances for oversight of officials at all
levels of government.

China’s system of multi-party co-
operation and consultation, led by the
CPC, is a political innovation in includ-
ing inputs and ideas from diverse seg-
ments of society, while still maintaining
harmony of spirit and consistency in

policies. But because of its scale and
power, the CPC, which is the ruling
party, has a higher obligation to pay
attention to other parties and voices. A
true democracy is measured by how the
majority treats the minority.

GT: As a decades-long observer of China,
what do you think the constitutional
amendment will bring to the country?
Kuhn: This constitutional amendment
is all about strengthening China’s
system of governance, especially the
Party’s leadership of the country and
President Xi Jinping’s leadership of the
Party and the nation.

Going by the whiplash of Western
reactions, one could be forgiven for as-
suming that the amendment is all about
abolishing term limits of the president
and vice president. In fact, there are 21
clauses in the constitutional amend-
ment and to understand where China
is going, one must gauge the meaning
and intent of all of them.

Xi has been consistent in respect-
ing, indeed in championing, China’s
Constitution, and by now amending it,
he underscores the congruity between
the realities of how China is governed
and what the Constitution says — thus
bolstering Xi’s commitment to the Rule
of Law.

Establishing the National Supervi-
sory Law and Commissions, expanding
the anti-corruption campaign to all
public organs and organizations, reaf-
firms Xi’s commitment to enhancing
the rule of law.

As for term limits, it is not that Xi
will hold the formal titles of leader-
ship for life, but that he will hold real
eadership long enough to bring about
China’s national rejuvenation and es-
ablish Chinese type democratic norms.

All factors considered, because of
China’s special conditions and Xi’s spe-
cial capabilities, abolishing term limits
may be good for China. It is commonly
said that China’s system of governance
can ensure stability and consistency,

which is a necessary requirement
for advancing reform.

GT: What do you see as the under-
lying reason for the institutional
restructuring of the government
passed during the Two Sessions?
Kuhn: The sweeping restructur-
ing of the Chinese government
streamlines the bureaucracy,
eliminates institutional conflicts
of interest between government
bodies, aligns authority with
responsibility, and, significantly,
enhances the leadership of the
Party in the management as well
as the oversight of the govern-
ment. Although the restructur-
ing has multiple motivations, a
prime driver is to support China’s
continuing development under
complex conditions — a slowing
economy, uncertain financial risk,
unacceptable pollution, the special
demands of innovation.

Given China’s challenges at
home and abroad the government
restructure is timely. Some media
outlets describe it as a “reshuffle,”
as if the random rearrangement of

a deck of cards. I beg to differ.

This restructuring is as deliberate as
it is far-reaching — and planned precise-
ly to address a host of contradictions.
The outcome is to strengthen CPC’s
leadership throughout the country. In
fact, deepening reform is now defined,
for state as well as for Party institutions,
as strengthening the CPC’s leadership
in every sector. The aim is consistency
and uniformity in implementing policy.

The announcement of the restruc-
turing followed swiftly after the adop-
tion by the National People’s Congress
of the constitutional amendment, and
although both were long in the works,
their rapid-fire sequence serves to un-
derscore the preeminence of President
Xi in setting the new agenda, and the
power of the Party in implementing the
new policies.

GT: Environment has always been a
heated topic at the Two Sessions. How
do you see the prospect of green develop-
ment in China?
Kuhn: | have been following China’s
environmental problems for over two
decades, and until recent years under
President Xi. While officials would of
course decry pollution, it only became
progressively worse. Companies flouted
the law. The minuscule fines were a
small price for not worrying about the
cost of controlling pollution. Officials
were loath to risk impeding economic
growth. Today is dramatically different.
President Xi has raised ecology and
environment to the highest category of
national priorities. Ecological progress
is among the five top goals (along with
economic, political, cultural and social
progress). Green is the third of the New
(Five Major) Concepts of Development.
The change in attitudes toward pollu-
tion is stunning. For example, fines for
corporate pollution now hurt.

Page Editor:
yujincui@globaltimes.com.cn

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023687
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027953.txt,"going to happen soon, if only because the intelligence missions now required
were going to be a lot tougher. Israel now had control of the entire Sinai and the
Golan. To tap into enemy communications, we would have to push deeper
inside Egypt and Syria.

Soon after my return, we began planning the sayeret’s most ambitious
mission so far: targeting the main communications system between Suez City,
at the southern end of the canal, and Egyptian military headquarters in Cairo.
We were obviously going to have to go in by helicopter. But we faced not just
the risk of being spotted on the way in. The buildup of Egyptian forces along
the canal now included Soviet-made anti-aircraft missile batteries. We might
easily get shot down.

The mission struck the generals in the kirya as so risky as to border on the
insane. But I was confident that we could make it work. I began talking to the
few senior air force officers who seemed more receptive, as well as to officers
in the helicopter units. Not only had I flown into the Sinai on earlier missions. I
now also had a physics degree. Together, we developed a plan — using the desert
terrain, and drawing on the helicopters’ maneuverability — to calculate a flight
route that could avoid detection by Egyptian radar. As an extra fail-sale, I
proposed using three helicopters, and three sayeret teams. Two would fly
slightly higher, with the express aim of getting spotted, but still evading missile
fire. They would land far away from the real target of the operation. The main
team, with me in command, would also stage a pair of diversionary attacks:
planting explosives on a high-voltage electricity cable, and on the main oil
pipeline from Suez City to Cairo.

Still, for many weeks, the answer from the Airya was no. The man who had
succeeded Rabin as chief-of-staff after the war, Chaim Bar-Lev, dismissed it as
“a plan built on chicken legs.” In the end, what got us the green light was a
further escalation, on both sides, in the War of Attrition. In January 1970, Israeli
warplanes began a series of deep-penetration bombing raids, for the first time
striking targets dozens of miles, in some case hundreds of miles, back from the
canal. The Israeli bombing campaign reduced the chance we’d get shot down and
provided cover for our operation.

Our helicopters took off after sunset, nearly skimming the water and peeling
off in separate directions on the far shore. The other two aircraft headed 120
miles to the south. I led the main team of ten men. We set down a few miles
south of the road from Suez City to Cairo. We unloaded a pair of Jeeps, drove
off, and within an hour had placed our time-delay explosives on the electricity

105
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027953
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012215.txt,"a

10

41

12

MP:

MP:

MP:

MP:

MP:

MP:
|
MP:

MP:

(D

then she went to go to Marshall's to go get some, a skirt and a purse but sh
didn't get the skirt. She only ended up getting the purse and that was like a
black purse.

That's alt that happened?

Um hm.

Well, I’m hearing a lot more happened.

Like what, | know, jike what went around the school?

Like what went around the school. Tejl me what happened at school.

In school, everybody was saying thai} got paid $300 with the, for the old man.
That old guy. Cause he’s....ch, first of all, is that | gct fingered by the old man,
then it was | had sex with the old man and then it was I'm just a prostitutc and |
got paid $300.

Who was spreading these rumors araund?

Um, my, this girl, she used to be my friend] but | guess...

Where would she get ....

From Zack because | broke up with him. Well, that's what | think. | think when |
broke up with him, he got very mad and told the gir! cause this girl, she hated mo
because | wer out him and she likes him.

Which girl was this?
a
ME hiked Zack?

Yeah.

...went out with him so she started spreading these rumors?

Page 4 of 43

05121

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012215
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026495.txt,"Group, led by the brother of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign chairman, received millions lobbying for
Russia’s largest bank and the European Center for a Modern Ukraine, both with deep Kremlin ties.

The Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton took millions from Kremlin-connected businesses.

No evidence has emerged of Trump-Russia collusion, and Mr. Mueller has yet to bring collusion-
related charges against anyone. Evidence suggests one of his targets, George Papadopoulos, was lured
to London, plied with the prospect of Russian information damaging to Mrs. Clinton, and taken to
dinner, where he drunkenly bragged that he’d heard about such dirt but never seen it. These
circumstances not only fail to suggest Mr. Papadopoulos committed a crime, they reek of entrapment.
The source of this information, former Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, admits Mr.
Papadopolous never mentioned emails, destroying any reasonable inference of a connection between

the DNC hack and the Trump campaign.

Crossfire’s progenitors thus ignored an obvious question: If Russia promised unspecified dirt on Mrs.
Clinton but never delivered it, how would that amount to collusion with the Trump campaign? If
anything, such behavior suggests an attempt to entice and potentially embarrass Mr. Trump by

dangling the prospect of compromising information and getting his aides to jump at it.

Given the paucity of evidence, it’s staggering that the FBI would initiate a counterintelligence
investigation, led by politically biased staff, amid a presidential campaign. The aggressive methods
and subsequent leaking only strengthen that conclusion. If the FBI sincerely believed Trump
associates were Russian targets or agents, the proper response would have been to inform Mr. Trump

so that he could protect his campaign and the country.

Mr. Trump’s critics argue that the claim of political bias is belied by the fact that Crossfire was not
leaked before the election. In fact, there were vigorous, successful pre-election efforts to publicize the
Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire’s launch, CIA Director John Brennan and
Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons

embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington.

On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times published a letter to Mr. Comey from Senate Minority Leader
Harry Reid, saying he’d learned of “evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government
and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign,” which had “employed a number of individuals with
significant and disturbing ties to Russia and the Kremlin.” On Aug. 30, the ranking Democratic
members of four House committees wrote a public letter to Mr. Comey requesting “that the FBI assess
whether connections between Trump campaign officials and Russian interests” may have contributed
to the DNC hack so as “to interfere with the U.S. presidential election.” On Sept. 23, Yahoo News’s

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026495
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024813.txt,"ACKRELL CAPITAL
THE GREEN FIELD 2018

Cultivation chs oeap eater peers Production and Testing
and Supplies Services nity:
esr
sclabs Wises
©, @ssenseGrows 2) B=S ae
aaane Gp overieet SEC WANALYTICAL He =
fo Ed Lue"" Becton’ iHTG nares xtroktLAB (houses uc
| Eraacs
42 0 seats Cilece
° PERIDOT LABS cr
Soe MILE HIGH LABS ansiytics YLABS

is ~ (Beats @itas

Bidet »> ForwardGro 2 SONICS ¥ Phommicne NORTHERN INE
= = eee KenevirResearch ; . r
biawatt Pra = te Cp & = Cloudponics sles Packaging © Precistor! aa,
ie ecu CMT ay
eyes jaa pad @..| Gare) ea © Steep Hill
wa Oo Se Q)YITALIS | | @ganresco BudGenius #1

AS) ce amentte. | Yotumo Neves
Distribution
Dispensaries

E-Commerce
BB Pei nucrcone nen LivWell elemental » = =f Trulieve

ase woNAReH vO oe rae one “© a. fete
C. om cin ita “hs Gi leofinelabs =-

Hy 227e™ om wine Sbork
voro! CLUB | M ie —

PURE
ota lit giaen _
(OREN) OW Soe ais WUDBAY 5 cqnideal @ mast
Sitradiv

Oct Ay lm | ?
OeverTree
CMRF swe eiflag

Distribution

Services
Ld A
THE [Sélstlcs OLO KAI

iY) SOURCE ©

A CANARD LEAF ee
SUNSTONE = RUKU

wing at MS aren No at
On CO mat SO me
a apie sm a mare mn @ =
Stemi dy ee
mm... o282®,

eae  herbofi

Es

ie Ge x eneahoaa PISE blackbird 4 HIGHLY ostemUTED
FIVE ZERO § TREES wel aES * [Elie] athe g | THEG.CAR COMPANIES

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024813
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031447.txt,"MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C.
ATTORNEY AT LAW

20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 EMAIL ADDRESSES;

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116

a
nx
NIGHT EMERGENCY

August 19, 2015

Via Certified Mail

Melanie Ann Pustay

Director of Office of Information Policy

Sean R. O’Neill

Chief, Administrative Appeals Staff

Office of Information Policy

United States Department of Justice, Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530

RE: FBI Request No 1203982-001/ DOJ OIP Appeal AP-2013-01397 (Jeffrey
Epstein)

Dear Ms. Pustay and Mr. O’Neill:

On March 29, 2013, the OIP determined that the FBI could not rely on 5 U.S.C. §
552(b)(7)(A) as a basis to withhold all records of past investigations regarding Mr. Epstein’s
prior FBI FOIA request. On April 25, 2013, the FBI reopened the above-numbered FOIA
request and stated that it had started its processing and searching for responsive records. On
June 24, 2013, the FBI was informed that Mr. Epstein would pay the costs of copying. At
present, 27 ‘2 months after the FBI started to process Mr. Epstein’s FOJA request, Mr. Epstein
has received just two “batches,” the first numbering 372 pages (including redactions) that was
produced on December 16, 2014, and the second “batch” numbering 336 pages that was
produced 5 4 months later on May 29, 2015, out ofa file that exceeds 12,000 pages. The
processing of a third “batch” of documents will not begin until, at earliest, October, 2015, see
infra. At this pace, the FBI will not complete the processing Mr. Epstein’s file until 2025. A
citizen should not have to wait over a decade for an agency to meet its FOIA obligations. As
documented below — and within the May 1, 2015, and August 13, 2015, letters to Mr. Dennis
Argall, FBI FOIPA Public Liaison Officer, each of which are attached — the FBI has declined to
meet its statutory obligations in providing Freedom of Information Act mandated disclosures
relating to the above-numbered request without unreasonable delay. Accordingly, I appeal to the
OIP to require the FBI to comply with its March 29, 2013, determination in a reasonably prompt
manner.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031447
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017956.txt,"Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 22 of 28

78. Wholly absent at this point was any assertion by Mr. Dershowitz that Ms. Roberts
was lying, or that she made up her charge as part of an extortion claim, or that after investigating
his alleged evidence Ms. Roberts’ lawyer did not believe her. On the contrary, Mr. Dershowitz
expressly recognized that Ms. Roberts’ belief was an honest one. All Mr. Dershowitz was
pleading for was an acknowledgement that there was a “possibility” that there “may be” a case of
mistaken identification. Even that plea was rejected by Ms. Roberts and her lawyers as
misleading.

79.  Dershowitz’s present PR claim that Roberts’ lawyers disbelieved their client, and
that Roberts intentionally committed perjury as part of an extortion scheme, is just another
Dershowitz lie. His reliance on statements taken out of context, his failure to include the
statements of Roberts’ lawyer after Dershowitz’s supposed evidence had been investigated, and
the damning admissions of his own lawyers, reveal Dershowitz’s total lack of support for his
allegation that Roberts and her lawyers concocted knowingly false allegation against him as part
of a supposed extortion plot.

80. Dershowitz also lied to attempt to deflect Sarah Ransome’s revelations about him.
Ms. Ransome revealed that during the time she was a victim of Epstein’s sex trafficking,
Epstein’s arranged for his lawyer, Dershowitz, to also represent Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome
also described how, during the time Dershowitz was her lawyer, Epstein lent her out to
Dershowitz for sex. (Exhibit 14).

81. Dershowitz asserted that he never had sex with Ms. Ransome, that he never
represented Ms. Ransome, that he did not even know Ms. Ransome, and that Ms. Ransome’s
statements about him were fabricated by Ms. Roberts’ lawyer in retaliation for a bar complaint

that Dershowitz had filed against that lawyer (Exhibit 16). However, as Dershowitz knew:

22

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017956
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030981.txt,"Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share to More

A new book claims Jeffrey Epstein played a key role in a shady Palm Beach real estate deal between President
Donald Trump and a Russian oligarch.

Michael Wolff’s forthcoming book, “Siege,” details the 2004 property deal that involved the future president,
Deutsche Bank, a child predator and an ally of Russian president Vladimir Putin, reported The Guardian.

ADVERTISING

According to Wolff's account, Epstein showed his friend Trump a $55 million mansion he planned to buy, but
Trump instead went behind his back to buy the foreclosed property for about $40 million.

Epstein didn’t believe Trump could raise that much money on his own, through an entity called Trump
Properties LLC that was entirely financed by Deutsche Bank, Wolff wrote.

The billionaire financier knew Trump had been loaning out his name in real estate deals for a fee, and he
suspected the freshly minted reality TV star was fronting for the mansion’s real owners.

Epstein threatened to expose the deal until he found himself under investigation by Palm Beach police for child
sex abuse and human trafficking, and he eventually served 13 months in county jail as part of a controversial
plea agreement brokered by Trump’s future Labor Secretary Alex Acosta.

Trump later put the mansion on the market for $125 million, despite making only minor improvements to the
property.

It was purchased for $96 million by Dmitry Rybolovlev, a Kremlin-linked industrialist — which meant Trump
made $55 million on the deal despite risking none of his own money.

Wolff offers two possible theories for the deal.

The author suspects that Trump may have earned a fee for hiding a shadow owner who possibly was funneled
cash by Rybolovlev for reasons beyond the property’s value.

Or, Wolff theorizes, Rybolovlev essentially bought the house from himself, with Trump as an intermediary, to
launder ill-gotten money.

“This,” Wolff wrote, “was Donald Trump’s world of real estate.”

Rybolovlev tore down the mansion in 2016 and sold off the property as three lots for less than the $115 million
he had invested in it.

Top of Form

Don't let Silicon Valley control what you see. Get more stories like this
in your inbox, every day.
Email Address

Bottom of Form

AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Flipboard
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share to More

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030981
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016490.txt,"maintaining anonymity for the victims of sexual assault and respectfully requests that this Court
also direct the District Attorney’s Office to redact the names of any victims before serving the
Post with copies of the redacted appellate briefs. The Post further requests that this Court order
the District Attorney’s Office to provide the Post with copies of the redacted briefs within seven
days of entry of its order granting this motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. Epstein’s Conviction for Sex Crimes and Designation as a Level Three Sex Offender

In June 2008, a Florida Court sentenced Jeffrey Epstein to eighteen months in prison after
he pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a fourteen-year-old girl. Affirmation of John M.
Browning dated December 21, 2018 (“Browning Aff.”), Ex. A.

After serving thirteen months of his sentence, Epstein was released and required to
register as a sex offender in New York, where he owned property and sought to reside. /d. Ex.
B. The New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (““NYBSO”) recommended that
Epstein be designated a level three sex offender — which is the level reserved for the most
dangerous sexual predators — because investigators in Florida had found compelling evidence
that Epstein had abused scores of underage girls, despite only pleading guilty to solicitation of a
single minor. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d at 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d at 240.

Remarkably, New York Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Gaffney ignored the NYBSO
recommendation and asked the trial court tasked with deciding Epstein’s sex-offender status to
designate him as a level one offender only, which is the least-restrictive category possible and is
typically applied to offenders who pose the lowest risk of committing further crimes. Jd. ADA
Gaffney argued that, since “there was only an indictment for one victim,” Epstein should not be

placed under the heavy scrutiny required for the most dangerous class of abusers. /d. Ex. B. For

481 1-3721-9459v.3 3930033-000039

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016490
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027947.txt,"abstract ideas, the theoretical sciences and, often, music as well. I would always
smile in response, suggesting that such diagnoses were probably best left to the
professionals. I couldn’t pretend, however, that emotional engagement with new
acquaintances, even with people I knew and liked but were not close friends,
was something that came naturally. And it is also true that from my first
experience of the world of numbers as a child on the kibbutz, and as I tackled
ever more elaborate pieces on the piano, I did become aware of what might be
called the upside of “a touch of Aspergers” — if that, indeed, is what it is. I was
conscious of the ease with which my brain translated the complexities into
pictures in my mind. And the joy, at times, with which it allowed me to play
around with, and develop, what I saw.

By the summer of 1967, I had experienced that feeling again, in my first real
encounter with theoretical physics at Hebrew University. After the Six-Day
War, I began seriously contemplating a future as a research scientist, or perhaps
eventually a professor of physics. Two months after the war, I enrolled in a
summer program at the Weizmann Institute, Israel’s preeminent postgraduate
research facility. Surrounded by some of the country’s, even the world’s,
leading scientists, and by post-doctoral students determined to follow in their
footsteps, was intellectually enthralling. But it turned out to have another effect
on me as well. As I thought more and more about the prospect of joining their
fraternity once I’d completed my undergraduate degree, I also heard them
describe the way in which pure science sometimes got submerged in simple
routine, or, more discouragingly, in the politics and positioning and backbiting
of the academic world.

I think what finally changed my mind, however, was a feeling, nurtured on
the kibbutz but solidified by that many nights I’d spent leading sayeret
operations across our borders, that I would find my true purpose in life trying to
make some special contribution to the future course of Israel. I did not for a
moment contemplate politics at that point. Instead, I thought of going back into
the military. I realized that in order to make a significant mark, if indeed I
could, would require me to serve in the regular army, not just an extraordinary
unit like Sayeret Matkal. But I did hope that, at some stage, I’d be given the
opportunity to finish my time in the sayeret as its commander, carrying on
Avraham’s vision and, ideally, building and expanding on it as well. At least if
that part proved possible, I felt that, by comparison, a career in academia would
be somehow blinkered, and surely less fulfilling personally. My sayeret
experience had also taught me something else as well: that protecting Israel’s
security was not just a matter of muscle, or firepower, indispensible though they

99
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027947
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023693.txt,"‘a
e

ECGINA iG SE KAS

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023693
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026481.txt,"Papadopolous never mentioned emails, destroying any reasonable inference of a connection between

the DNC hack and the Trump campaign.

Crossfire’s progenitors thus ignored an obvious question: If Russia promised unspecified dirt on Mrs.
Clinton but never delivered it, how would that amount to collusion with the Trump campaign? If
anything, such behavior suggests an attempt to entice and potentially embarrass Mr. Trump by

dangling the prospect of compromising information and getting his aides to jump at it.

Given the paucity of evidence, it’s staggering that the FBI would initiate a counterintelligence
investigation, led by politically biased staff, amid a presidential campaign. The aggressive methods
and subsequent leaking only strengthen that conclusion. If the FBI sincerely believed Trump
associates were Russian targets or agents, the proper response would have been to inform Mr. Trump

so that he could protect his campaign and the country.

Mr. Trump’s critics argue that the claim of political bias is belied by the fact that Crossfire was not
leaked before the election. In fact, there were vigorous, successful pre-election efforts to publicize the
Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire’s launch, CIA Director John Brennan and
Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons

embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington.

On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times published a letter to Mr. Comey from Senate Minority Leader
Harry Reid, saying he’d learned of “evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government
and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign,” which had “employed a number of individuals with
significant and disturbing ties to Russia and the Kremlin.” On Aug. 30, the ranking Democratic
members of four House committees wrote a public letter to Mr. Comey requesting “that the FBI assess
whether connections between Trump campaign officials and Russian interests” may have contributed
to the DNC hack so as “to interfere with the U.S. presidential election.” On Sept. 23, Yahoo News’s
Michael Isikoff reported the Hill briefings and the Steele dossier’s allegations regarding Carter Page.
On Oct. 30, Harry Reid again publicly wrote Mr. Comey: “In my communications with you and other
top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive
information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the

Russian government.”

That these leaking efforts failed to prevent Mr. Trump’s victory, or that Mr. Comey’s ham-fisted
interventions might have also hurt Mrs. Clinton’s electoral prospects, does not diminish the legal

significance of the anti-Trump bias shown by government officials.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026481
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030759.txt,"the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030759
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012201.txt,"JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, Esq.
May 19, 2008
PAGE 4 OF 6

B. Method of Compensation and Notification.

During this same time period, you and others, including the former Solicitor General of the
United States Kenneth Starr, took issue with the implementation of the methodology of
compensation (hereinafter “the 2255 provision”)’ and the SDFL’s intention to notify the victims
under 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (you objected to victims being notified of time and place of Epstein’s
state court sentencing hearing). In response, the SDFL offered, in my opinion, numerous and various
reasonable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney
R. Alexander Acosta’s December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United
States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the SDFL was not obligated to
address, let alone consider. He proposed the following language regarding the 2255 provision:

“Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense enumerated in
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under
Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein been tried federally and convicted of an
enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall
provide Mr. Epstein’s attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in
an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority
interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens
if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these
identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been
convicted at trial. No more; no less.”

Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the
federal resolution as required by law; however, “[w]e will defer to the discretion of the State
Attomey regarding whether he wishes to provide victims with notice of the state proceedings,
although we will provide him with the information necessary to do so if he wishes.” As you know,

_ you rejected these proposals as well. See December 26, 2007 correspondence from J ay Lefkowitz
to USA Acosta. .

? Prior to any issues arising concerning the implementation of the 2255 provision, the SDFL
unilaterally agreed to assign its responsibility to select the attorney representative for the alleged victims
to an independent third-party. This was done to avoid even the appearance of favoritism in the selection
of the attorney representative. As a result, on October 29, 2007, the parties executed an Addendum
wherein it was mutually agreed that former United States District Court Judge Edward B: Davis would
serve as the independent third-party. Judge Davis selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and
Josefsberg to represent the approximately 34 alleged identified victims.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012201
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024807.txt,"ACKR
CAPI

BLL

CHAPTER X_ Glossary of Terms

DEA U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, an agency of the U.S. Department of Justice

Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) a nonpsychoactive cannabinoid found abundantly in
raw flower; precursor to THC; decarboxylates into THC through the application of intense heat

DHHS U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
DOJ U.S. Department of Justice
DOT U.S. Department of the Treasury

Dronabinol a form of chemically synthesized THC included in certain FDA-approved pharma-
ceuticals; a Schedule II or Schedule III controlled substance under the CSA, depending on its
preparation

Drying a part of the harvesting phase of cannabis cultivation during which plants are dried; typically
occurs at room temperature in a dark space

ECDD Expert Committee on Drug Dependence; a committee of the World Health Organization
(WHO) tasked with making drug control recommendations to the CND on behalf of the WHO

ECOSOC Economic and Social Council, one of the six main organs of the United Nations established
under the United Nations charter in 1945

Edible a food- or drink-based infused product intended for oral consumption; commonly baked
goods, flavored drinks or candies

Endocannabinoid cannabinoids created naturally by the human body
Exchange Act Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Extraction a process for extracting active compounds from the cannabis plant; extraction techniques
fall into two general categories, solvent-based extraction and solvent-free extraction

Farm Bill Agricultural Act of 2014

FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration, an agency of the DHHS
FD&C Act Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

FinCEN Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau of the DOT

FinCEN Memo a memorandum published by FinCEN outlining how banks and other financial
institutions can, consistent with their BSA obligations, provide services to marijuana-related
businesses

Flower the flower of the cannabis plant, also known as “bud”; the highest concentration of active
compounds present in cannabis are found in the flowers of unpollinated female cannabis plants;
smoking flower is the most popular method of cannabis consumption

Ganja a popular name for cannabis

Germination the process by which a dormant seed begins to sprout and grow into a seedling

© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC 171

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024807
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029899.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 1/8/2015 3:11:21 PM
To: Kathy Ruemm|er
Subject: Fwd: idea for jefferey e.

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Lawrence H. Summers {i ii Zi 7 7
Date: Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 PM

Subject: Fwd: idea for jefferey e.

To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>

Not terrible idea.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office |

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kelly Fricnd|y a >
Date: January 7, 2015 at 5:01:26 PM PST
To: ""Lawrence H. Summers"" <

Subject: idea for jefferey e.

Perhaps you should suggest Jefferey talk to Joe Lockhart at the Glover Park Group. He has helped Clinton
and General Petraeus.

Joe is great and he likes you a lot. LMK if you want to reach out to him. He is an old friend....

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029899
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011708.txt,"I’d been impressed by President Bush’s political acumen in assembling an
international coalition including the key Arab states. Through Unit 8200 in
military intelligence, we would only very occasionally get verbatim transcripts
of his conversations as he brought first the Saudis and other Gulf states on
board, then Morocco, and eventually even Syria. More often, I’d see the
President’s deft diplomacy second-hand, through intercepts of Arab leaders’
communications with one another. But the picture which emerged was of an
American president deftly able to stake out common ground, and common
interests, with each of the Americans’ growing number of anti-Saddam allies.

When we entered the Oval Office on the evening of February 11, Bush was
flanked by Secretary of State Baker, Defense Secretary Cheney and national
security adviser Brent Scowcroft. Also there was Colin Powell, a general whom
I had got to know well, and to like, over the past few years and who was now
head of the joint chiefs-of-staff. Given the seriousness of our mission, the start
of the meeting was almost surreal. The Americans had obviously been told that
I was born on February 12. Since it was just past midnight in Israel, they began
by wishing me a happy 49"" birthday.

Yet pleasing thought that was, it became clear there was a disconnect
between the tension among Israeli government ministers, and ordinary Israelis,
back home and the relaxed, self-assured, at times even jovial mood of the
President and his inner circle. Their primary focus was clearly not on Israel, but
on the overwhelming success of their air attacks on Iraq and the approach of a
ground offensive that they were confident would finish the job. That didn’t
seem to change even after a truly extraordinary interruption to our meeting,
when one of Misha’s aides passed on the news that a Scud had struck the Tel
Aviv suburb of Savyon, where Misha himself ltved. He immediately excused
himself and went to phone his wife, Muriel, to confirm she was fine. When he
returned, despite their pro forma words of empathy, it seemed almost as if the
Americans thought we had cooked up the entire thing for political effect.

Bush did say the right things as the discussion turned to the missile attacks
on Israel. He told us he understood our frustration, and the pain the Scud
launches were inflicting. He appreciated our restraint. I have no doubt that all of
that was true. But the message we’d been sent to deliver clearly wasn’t hitting
home. As politely but as clearly as I could, I told President Bush that while we
didn’t want to do anything to undermine the coalition, unless someone else took
care of the Scuds, we would have no choice but to act.

237
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011708
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030310.txt,"De ee ee ee ee ee ee ee i ee a

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030310
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033420.txt,"From: Kathy Ruemmler 
Sent: 12/4/2018 3:20:07 PM 
To: jeeyacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Slowing economy could increase pressure on Big Tech - Axios 
Importance: High 
What do we think of this? 
https://www.axios.com/recession-threat-2019-regulatory-risk-google-facebook-amazon-b8966b22-57dc-426c-
9f4f-5526982383c7.html  
Slowing economy could increase pressure on 
Big Tech 
Sara Fischer, David McCabe, Courtenay Brown5 hours ago 
A potential recession, combined with increasing regulatory threats for some of the biggest 
tech companies, foreshadows a difficult 2019 for Silicon Valley. 
Why it matters: The biggest tech companies have already raked in billions of dollars in 
profits and benefited from major tax cuts that aren't going to be repeated, so next year isn't 
likely to be better for them financially. They've also been dogged by scandals that have left 
many questioning their positive role in society, and if on top of that the economy starts to 
slip, 2019 could be worse. 
""People look for scapegoats in a bad economy. And with big tech already on its heels, a 
downturn probably would feed arguments that the largest internet companies are too big 
and need to be reined in."" 
— Paul Gallant, an analyst with Cowen Washington Research Group 
Big Tech is closing out a contentious year in Washington, and potential regulation will 
continue to haunt it well into 2019. 
• Google CEO Sundar Pichai has agreed to testify before Congress, and will likely be 
asked about whether the company is being transparent about its data privacy practices and 
any potential bias. By the year's end, the CEOs of Twitter, Google and Facebook will have 
been called to testified in front of Congress for the first time ever during 2018. 
• Lawmakers in the United States are pushing for a federal privacy law with an urgency 
likely to be exacerbated by more breaches like the one Marriott disclosed last Friday. 
• The Federal Trade Commission still has an open investigation into whether 
Facebook's conduct violated a previous settlement with the agency. Margrethe Vestager, 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033420 
Europe's aggressive commissioner overseeing competition, is still investigating aspects of 
Google's business and whether Amazon plays fair in the market for generic products. 
• President Trump has said his administration is seriously looking into monopolistic 
behavior of Facebook, Google and Amazon. 
Some analysts predict an economic slowdown___even if it doesn't lead to a recession like 
the one in 2008___will be enough to change the global attitude around big American 
companies. 
""So the really shocking thing this year is that the only major economy in the world where 
growth has actually accelerated this year is America. And this is because of the tax cuts, the 
deregulation, the other stimulus which has been put into work. And that has also helped the 
earnings of companies. My point is, from next year onwards, those effects begin to fade."" 
— Ruchir Sharma, chief global strategist at Morgan Stanley on Fareed Zakaria GPS  
on Sunday 
The ""FAANG"" stocks (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google) that pushed the 
stock market to record highs have not been immune from this year's market rout. 
• ""The mood has changed. Investors are asking a lot more questions right now,"" says 
Larry Glazer, a Managing Partner at Mayflower Advisors, which manages $3 billion. 
""Momentum has faded on these names."" 
• Adding to potential concern: possible regulatory action could translate into higher 
costs, particularly for Google or Facebook. 
• ""Facebook has been under such a dark cloud for so long that now everybody is 
expecting the worst,"" Paul Meeks, a technology portfolio manager at Wireless Fund, told 
Amos. 
The other side: ""I don't see a looming recession. And even if there was, people aren't going 
to target these companies if there is a recession,"" says Nicholas Economides, Professor of 
Economics at NYU Stem School of Business. 
• Economides argues that, even if there was a mild reduction in GDP growth, it 
wouldn't significantly impact the high tech sector. 
• For companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter, ""their main revenue streams are 
from ads. They gain market share from brands converting traditional ad spend to digital ads. 
This conversion is not so dependent on the growth of GDP, because they are still in the 
process of converting ads of different formats to digital ads, and that's something that will 
continue, regardless of GDP growth."" 
The bottom line: Tech companies that have long been the darlings of investor portfolios 
will likely find themselves in much weaker positions. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033421 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029127.txt,"6. Foundations of Mathematics / Philosophy/Meaning of Math (discovered/invented?)

ADD/Exchange to Biological Breakthrough episodes

9/10. Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in
biomedical and psychological research - the scandal in recent years.

In the non-Closer To Truth world....

Did CNN Intl this morning on Trump’s China-oil-N.Korea-cheating tweet “Caught RED HANDED...”
[pun deliberate? ]

My favorite fun lines (there are so many) in Trump's NYTimes spontaneous interview.

2) “TI like very much President Xi. He treated me better than anybody’s ever been treated in the history of
China.”

Ever (~5,000 year history)
1) “I know the details of taxes better than anybody — better than the greatest CPA.”

Not, mind you, CPAs in general, not even smart Jewish CPAs who work all the time - but whoever, out
of 664,532 actively licensed CPAs (2016), is the greatest CPA of them all (#1 in citing code? creative
deductions?) - better than him!

On Dec 29, 2017, at 6:19 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

lets talk today. I went through the candidates in math. . we should talk , I have great hopes for this and
am sure you woudl want to get it right though some of the math people write well , their speakinn style and
presence is less than A , and probaby closertoaC+/ . Im around today or hte weekend if you would like
to chat.

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Robert Kuhn > wrote:
‘Blahblahs’ forbidden in ""Radical Breakthroughs’. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science
and Rare Sentience).

Initial ideas:

* Expand the first episode “Mathematics and Truth” into two or likely three episodes. I’m intrigued by this
because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner’s
‘unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)’, astrophysics, cosmology, biology,
general systems theory. I’ve felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three
episodes could work - if you agree, I’ll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts.
Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277
episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029127
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012907.txt,"x1

e Crunchkin and Pumpkin, for regularly getting me away from the desk to stroll around the
village where we live; many of my best ideas about AGI and other topics have emerged
while walking with my furry four-legged family members

September 2013
Ben Goertzel

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012907
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032058.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 10/13/2016 6:14:55 PM 
To: Kathy Ruemmler 
Subject: Fwd: CNN Inquiry 
Forwarded message 
From:____________________________ 
Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:08 PM 
Subject: Fwd: CNN Inquiry 
To: JEE <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Fyi 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Melanie Hicken <hit-reply@linkedin.com> 
Date: October 13, 2016 at 8:03:22 PM GMT+2 
To 
Subject: CNN Inquiry 
Reply-To: Melanie Hicken 
Darren Indyke 
I'm a reporter at CNN, and my colleague Blake Ellis and I have read that Bill Clinton and Donald 
Trump have both visited Epstein's private island. We are trying to determine whether there is any 
truth to the allegations that either or both of these men may have had sexual relations with minors 
while there. We know that you have been Epstein's pilot, so we're wondering if you would be willing 
to speak with us completely off the record. We are not focusing on the allegations against Epstein --
we are solely focusing on Trump and Clinton given the current allegations being levied in the press. 
If you don't feel comfortable sharing anything via social media or email, feel free to send us any 
documentation/proof that might be helpful anonymously via mail: 
Melanie Hicken 
You can also reach us by phone: 
Thanks so much, 
Melanie 
Reply 
Not 
interested 
View Melanie's LinkedIn profile 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032058 
You are receiving InMail notification ern& Unsubscribe 
This email was intended fo (Corporate Pilot in SoCal - Gulfstream GIV Current). Learn why we included this. 
If you need assistance or have questions, please contact LinkedIn Customer Service 
@ 2016, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032059 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030476.txt,"is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory
that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.

Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept
running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of
young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember
asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you, Vicky,” was his riposte.

I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t
studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at
home via messenger. It was a book: “Math for idiots.”

So he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.

“Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,” newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He
was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few
moments in his company and you know this to be true.

When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that
“Andy’—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his
strange title is. Because if one thing’s for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what
he’s talking about far more than “Andy” does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other
financiers hang out with him.

And Ghislaine?
Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It’s almost impossible not to.

She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I’ve spent hours
talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is
curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent
me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else’s I can think of—probably even
Rupert Murdochs’. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill
Clinton with whom she is close friends.

Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 4oth birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-
Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as “the Tennis Goddess”) Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When
it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability.
And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey.

“He saved her,” I remember a close friend of mine telling me. “When her father died, she was a wreck;
inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She’s never forgotten that—and never will.”

In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect
replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his
sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine’s father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving
a massive “black hole” he’d fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that
strange.

In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful
people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl
issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You
don’t tend to get to the top by being the world’s most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett
didn’t quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second “wife” for many years whose existence he
has been open about.

So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven’t spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030476
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018792.txt,"ot ae nett yer owrn weak Ro ag dees e : amet F = ae |

re eee ee ae a Hy tg OE tam ney * i c Sor i ‘ *
an wR or Sr Hag tales : : : wm

lta” = mS =, i "" s -

—

a OR =e “yee
4) NEWNORK: 4-526

. at
* Sd? Vee, z
ae .

ec sa Sa sO Sl

“Ay Ye

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018792
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025944.txt,"From: Bruce Moskowitz 
Sent: 6/30/2016 2:25:23 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: Research App 
Importance: High 
This is what my son Aaron developed. Read below from David Hayes at the Mayo Clinic. How do I get David's email to 
Biden? Thanks 
Sent from my iPad 
Bruce Moskowitz M.D. 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Hayes, David L., M.D."" < 
Date: June 30, 2016 at 8:57:26 AM EDT 
To: ""Bruce Moskowitz 
Subject: Research App 
)"" < 
Bruce — thought of you when watching the evening news yesterday. Joe Biden was being interviewed about his work on 
""Cancer Moonshot"" or something like that. He said that they were working on or planned to work on a database/app 
that has never before been done, that would allow a patient or a physician to see who was doing research on a specific 
tumor anywhere in the world. 
You've already got it. You have connections everywhere, you should get to Biden on that work group. 
David 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025944 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012130.txt,"KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 
AND AFFILIATED PARTNERSHIPS 
Kenneth W. Starr 
o Call Writer Directly 
Chicago 
777 South Figueroa Street 
Los Angeles, California 90017 
(213) 680-8400 
www.kirkland.com 
June 19, 2008 
John Roth, Esq. 
Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General 
Office of the Deputy Attorney General 
United States Department of Justice 
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4115 
Washington, D.C. 20530 
Dear Mr. Roth: 
Facsimile: 
I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we believe that a federal 
prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. I appreciate your having informed us that you 
already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as well 
as our prior written submissions to CEOS and to the Southern District of Florida. 
In light of the significant volume of our prior submissions and to facilitate your review, 
we have drafted four supplemental submissions that will provide a roadmap for your 
investigation of this matter. Given the bulk of these documents and their appended supporting 
attachments, you will receive this packet by messenger tomorrow. A brief description of each of 
the four submissions follows. First, I have included a succinct summary of the facts, law and 
policy issues at hand. This document sets forth a basic overview of the issues and summarizes 
our principal contentions as to why federal prosecution of this matter is neither appropriate nor 
warranted. 
The three other submissions include: a summary of the irregularities and misconduct that 
occurred during the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker 
that responds to CEOS 's assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein's case; and a point-by-
point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman's recent letter which we 
believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States 
Attorney's Office in Miami (the ""USAO""). Also, for your reference, the package you receive 
tomorrow will contain a binder including all documentation to which we refer in our 
submissions. Finally, we will be providing a detailed checklist of each submission or substantive 
communication to the USAO. Our intention is that you have copies of each such document to 
enhance your review. If there are any that you have not received from the USAO or CEOS, 
please advise and we will fedex them to you without delay. 
Hong Kong London Munich New York San Francisco Washington, D.C. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012130 
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 
John Roth, Esq. 
June 19, 2008 
Page 2 
As you are likely aware, the Department's prior review of this matter was incomplete 
and, by its own admission, not ""de novo."" See Tab 38, May 15, 2008 Letter from A. Oosterbaan. 
Without considering the Non Prosecution Agreement that left this matter to be resolved in the 
State or any of the misconduct, CEOS reviewers, tasked with reviewing some of their own 
previously expressed opinions, assessed only whether the United States Attorney would ""abuse 
[his] discretion"" if he pursued this case. While we appreciate CEOS' s willingness to examine 
these limited issues, its conclusion that a prosecution would not be an ""abuse of discretion"" rings 
particularly hollow in light of CEOS 's admirably candid concessions that we have raised 
""compelling"" objections and that a prosecution on these facts would require ""novel"" applications 
of federal law. Indeed, even a brief review of CEOS's own mission statement reveals how 
inapposite a federal prosecution is to the facts in this case. 
Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's 
very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the 
Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal criminal law—powerfully 
demonstrate the substantive vulnerability of the USAO's unprecedented employment of three 
federal laws. That Office's interpretation would never pass muster under the Supreme Court's 
recent pronouncements and should not be countenanced. That is all the more true under the 
circumstances where the duly appointed U.S. Attorney opined that, in effect, the ""unitary"" 
Executive Branch was driving this prosecution. We now know that is not so. 
What I respectfully request, and what I hope you will provide, is a truly ""de novo"" 
review—that is, an independent assessment of whether federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is both 
necessary and warranted in view of the legal and evidentiary hurdles that have been identified, 
the existence of a State felony plea and sentence that have been advocated by the State Attorney 
for Palm Beach County, and the many issues of prosecutorial misconduct and overzealousness 
that have permeated the investigation. I also request that you provide us with the opportunity 
during your review to meet with you in person to answer any questions you may have and to 
elucidate some of the issues in our submission. 
We believe that an independent review will confirm our strong belief that federal 
prosecutors would be required to stretch the plain meaning of each element of the enumerated 
statutes, and then to combine these distorted elements in a tenuous chain, in order to convict Mr. 
Epstein. Indeed, just this week (and after two years of federal involvement in this matter), 
Assistant United States Attorney Villafana re-initiated the federal grand jury investigation—in 
direct contravention of the parties' Non Prosecution Agreement—and issued yet another 
subpoena seeking evidence in this case. See Tab 19, Subpoena to In the 
subpoena, AUSA Villafana directs_____________________to appear on July 1, 2008 to give testimony 
and produce documents to FGJ 07-103 West Palm Beach. The attachment to the subpoena seeks 
documents such as photographs, emails, telephone billing information, and contact information 
that relate to Mr. Epstein as well as specific other people who received protection from federal 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012131 
KIRKLAND &ELLIS LLP 
John Roth, Esq. 
June 19, 2008 
Page 3 
prosecution as a result of Mr. Epstein's having entered into the September 24, 2007 Non 
Prosecution Agreement with the USAO. 
Notably, the Non Prosecution Agreement contains the following agreed condition: 
Further, upon execution of this agreement and a plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office, 
the federal Grand Jury investigation will be suspended, and all pending federal Grand Jury 
subpoenas will be held in abeyance unless and until the defendant violates any term of this 
agreement. The defendant likewise agrees to withdraw his pending motion to intervene and to 
quash certain grand jury subpoenas. 
See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution Agreement. It also guarantees that persons 
identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as_________________________________and Leslie Groff 
and others will not be prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non-
Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised his rights to appeal to the 
Department of Justice with the full consent and knowledge of the USAO, he has not breached the 
Agreement. The re-commencing of the Grand Jury is in violation of the Agreement. 
But further, the new investigation, which features a wide-ranging, fishing-expedition type 
to search in New York does nothing to satisfy the very essential elements of federal statutes that 
are lacking despite the intensity of an over two-year investigation in the Palm Beach area. 
Absent evidence of Internet luring, inducements while using the phone, travel for the purpose, 
fraud or coercion, the subject of the New York investigation is as lacking in the essential basis 
for converting a state case into a federal case as is the remainder of the Florida investigation. 
The reaching out to New York to fill the void emanating from the failures of the Florida 
investigation compellingly demonstrates the misuse of federal resources in an overzealous, over-
personalized, selective and extraordinary attempt to expand federal law to where it is has never 
gone. This last-ditch attempt by Ms. Villafana reinforces our belief that the USA() does not have 
facts that, without distortion, would justify a prosecution of Mr. Epstein. 
In view of the prosecution's often-verbalized desire to punish Mr. Epstein, we believe 
that the prosecution summary suffers from critical inaccuracies and aggregates the expected 
testimony of witnesses so as to reach a conclusion of guilt. Our contention is reinforced by the 
fact that key prosecution witnesses have provided evidence and testimony that directly 
undermines the prosecution's misleading and inaccurate summary of its case. Indeed, we now 
have received statements from three of the principal accusers— _  (through a state 
criminal deposition), (through a federal FBI-USAO sworn and transcribed 
interview), and (through a defense—generated sworn transcribed interview). 
Each of these witnesses categorically denies each essential element that the prosecution will have 
to prove in order to convert this quintessential state-law case into a federal matter. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012132 
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 
John Roth, Esq. 
June 19, 2008 
Page 4 
It thus is especially troubling that the USAO has not provided us with the transcript of 
's federal interview, nor the substance of the interviews with Ms. or Ms. 
, nor any information generated by interviews with any of the approximately 40 alleged 
witnesses that the prosecution claims it has identified. Because the information provided by 
these women goes directly to the question of Mr. Epstein's guilt or innocence, it is classic Brady 
information. We understand that the U.S. Attorney might not want to disclose impeachment 
information about their witnesses prior to a charge or during plea negotiations. But we firmly 
believe that when the Government possesses information that goes directly to a target's factual 
guilt or innocence, the target should be informed about such heartland exculpatory evidence. 
Most importantly, aside from whether the Department believes Brady obligates 
disclosure to a target of a federal investigation prior to the target's formal accusation, no such 
limit should apply to a Department review. Accordingly, we request that you go beneath the face 
of any summary provided to you by the USAO and instead review the actual witness transcripts 
and FBI 302s, which are essential for you to be able to make a truly independent assessment of 
the strength and wisdom of any federal prosecution. 
After careful consideration of the record, and as much as it pains me to say this, I simply 
do not believe federal prosecutors would have been involved at all in this matter if not for Mr. 
Epstein's personal wealth and publicly-reported ties to former President Bill Clinton. A simple 
Internet search on Mr. Epstein reveals myriad articles and news stories about the former 
President's personal relationship with Mr. Epstein, including multi-page stories in New York 
Magazine and Vanity Fair. Mr. Epstein, in fact, only came to the public's attention a few years 
ago when he and the former President traveled for a week to Africa (using Mr. Epstein's 
airplane)—a trip that received a great deal of press coverage. I cannot imagine that the USA() 
ever would have contemplated a prosecution in this case if Mr. Epstein lacked this type of 
notoriety. 
That belief has been reinforced by the significant prosecutorial impropriety and 
misconduct throughout the course of this matter. While we describe the majority of these 
irregularities in another submission, two instances are particularly troubling. First, the USA() 
authorized the public disclosure of specific details of the open investigation to the New York 
Times—including descriptions of the prosecution's theory of the case and specific terms of a plea 
negotiation between the parties. Second, AUSA Villafana attempted to enrich friends and close 
acquaintances by bringing them business in connection with this matter. Specifically, she 
attempted to appoint a close personal friend of her live-in boyfriend to serve as an attorney-
representative for the women involved in this case. 
It also bears mentioning that actions taken by FAUSA Sloman present an appearance of 
impropriety that gives us cause for concern. Mr. Sloman's former law partner is currently 
pursuing a handful of $50-million lawsuits against Mr. Epstein by some of the masseuses. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012133 
KIRKLAND &ELLIS LLP 
John Roth, Esq. 
June 19, 2008 
Page 5 
Finally, as you know, Mr. Epstein and the USA() entered into an agreement that deferred 
prosecution to the State. In this regard, I simply note that the manner in which this agreement 
was negotiated contrasts sharply with Mr. Sloman's current representation that ""[Vile SDFL 
indicated a willingness to defer to the State the length of incarceration . . . "" See Tab 1, May 19, 
2008 Letter from J. Sloman, p. 2. This statement is simply not true. Contrary to Mr. Sloman's 
assertion, federal prosecutors refused to accept what the State believed to be appropriate as to 
Mr. Epstein's sentence and instead, insisted that Mr. Epstein be required serve a two-year term of 
imprisonment (which they later decreased to 18 months plus one year of house arrest). Federal 
prosecutors have not only involved themselves in what is quintessentially a state matter, but their 
actions have caused a critical appearance of impropriety that raises doubt as to their motivation 
for investigating and prosecuting Mr. Epstein in the first place. 
At bottom, we appreciate your willingness to review this matter with a fresh—and 
independent—set of eyes. To facilitate your review, I once again request the opportunity to 
make an oral presentation to supplement our written submissions, and we will promptly respond 
to any inquiries you may have. 
Kenneth W. Starr 
cc: Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012134 
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032490.txt,"Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032490
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031321.txt,"Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.

0/5 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

tl
fax
cell

On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Steven Pfeiffer {qq wrote:

Dear Richard,

Thanks so much for providing this information. I'm offsite today at
the ceremony venue, but | will be sure to send everything over to
you via email on Monday.

Best regards,
Steven

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Richard Kahn
> wrote:

The foundation that will be making this contribution is:
Gratitude America Ltd.

6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3

St Thomas, USVI 00802

please send all correspondence including invoice to me via email
thank you

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031321
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028321.txt,"THE HOUSE OF THE NOBLEMAN
CURATED BY WOLFE VON LENKIEWICZ & VICTORIA GOLEMBIOVSKAYA

PRESS CLIPPING (INTERNET)

http://www.abodyofartshop.com/art-moran-body-shop/cadogan-tate-sponsors-new-sensations-art-
exhibition.html

Cadogan Tate Sponsors New Sensations Art Exhibition

October 18, 2010 by
Filed under art moran body shop

(PRWEB) October 17, 2010

Cadogan Tate, the world class art moving, storage and shipping specialist in contemporary art, has sponsored the
‘New Sensations 2010’ exhibition for UK art students. Organised by Channel 4 and The Saatchi Gallery, this
prestigious event aims to discover the most imaginative and talented artists graduating from BA and MA courses
in the UK and to support students leaving art college.

A total of 20 students were shortlisted to present their work in the exhibition. This is being held at Boswall House,
2 Cornwall Terrace — a magnificent 18th century building off Regent’s Park — from 14th to 20th October. The
event forms part of ‘The House of the Nobleman’, under the curatorship of Wolfe von Lenkiewicz and Victoria
Golembiovskaya.

Four of the finalists in New Sensations 2010 — Pablo Wendel, Katie Surridge, Nika Neelova and Ula Wiznerowicz —
have each been given a bursary to develop a new work for the exhibition. A short film about each of them was
aired on Channel 4 in early October.

Stephen Glynn, Cadogan Tate’s Fine Art Director, comments: “We are delighted to be the sponsors of this
important exhibition, which showcases the talent of some remarkable young artists. We have spent many years
transporting and storing the world’s most precious contemporary art for leading museums, galleries and
collectors. It therefore seemed very appropriate that we should support and encourage the UK’s leading art
students through this exciting event.”

41

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028321
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021340.txt,"callous. Pets can be thoughtful or
devious. And every now and then,

computers can have a mind of their own.

Having the capacity to reason
about other minds enables people to
form deep social connections with
others, to empathize with others’ pain
and share in their joy, and to anticipate
others’ actions. But having a capacity
and actually using it are two different
things. People are not naturally inclined
to see invisible things in the
environment. People do not
automatically see into other minds,
either, but instead do so only under
certain circumstances and with some
psychological effort. This chapter will
describe how people come to see other
minds, how other minds can become
more or less visible, and why the
visibility of other minds matters for
everyday life.

Kinds of Minds

Studying how people understand
other minds first requires understanding
how people intuitively define another
mind. Research suggests that people
think of minds as having two distinct
dimensions, the ability to act (agency)
and the ability to feel (experience)’.
Mindful agency involves the cognitive
activities that enable action, such as the
capacity to plan, to have intentions, to
engage in deliberate self-control, and to
pursue one’s own goals. Conscious
preferences, attitudes, and beliefs follow
from these capacities. Mindful
experience, in contrast, involves the
cognitive activities involved in reacting
to the external world, such as the
capacity for self-awareness, and the
experience of basic psychological states
(like hunger, thirst, or pain), and other-
oriented emotions (such as empathy or
sympathy). Mindful experience also

Page |94

involves the capacity for
metacognition—the capacity to think
about one’s own thoughts or emotions—
exemplified in experiences such as
confidence and doubt, or in secondary
emotions such as shame, guilt, joy, or
hope. People seem to represent these
two capacities in others quite
independently. A sociopath, for
instance, can appear to act with a high
degree of mindful agency but no mindful
experience, whereas a baby might appear
full of mindful experience with
relatively little mindful agency. Seeing
other agents as mindful essentially
means seeing them as able to
consciously think and/or to feel.

Because you are aware of both your own
thoughts and feelings, you likely
consider yourself—like most people
do—to be very mindful.

Making Other Minds Visible

Introspection provides a kind of
flashlight that seems to provide direct
access to one’s own agency as well as
experience. Although research
demonstrates that introspection is
actually a process of indirect inference,
it appears to us that introspection
provides direct access to the workings of
our own brain. It seems that we can look
on the inside and fee/ when we are
suffering, know when we are
experiencing regret, or be aware of our
intentions to lose weight. We can use
our introspective abilities to make
inferences about what others are likely
thinking or feeling (and we very often
do), but such inferences are likely to
seem inherently less direct, less
immediate, and less illuminating. We
cannot see into other minds as clearly as
we seem able to see our own.

When something is difficult to
see, people may doubt whether it

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021340
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027012.txt,"2K 2K KOK KK KOK KOK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK KOK KK KK KK KK KK KK KK KK

e It is no secret, and I'll repeat it again, that we
live in a tough neighborhood, where there is no
mercy for the weak. And no second chance for
those who cannot defend themselves.

e Israel is the strongest country in the region and
the only genuinely open democracy.

e An unprecedented geopolitical earthquake in
the last three years has shattered the
generations’ old regional order.

e There are two clear lessons and one insight
which I have drawn from this period:

e #1: Be modest with predictions....... especially
about the future! Take Egypt as an example;
Mubarak was unable to predict it... who did?
Who thinks he could?

e #2: When friends tell me: Don’t worry... If
worse comes to worst ... the world will step
forward and act!

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027012
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015412.txt,"Trump reading out loud from a report that “80% of Central American
women and girls are raped crossing into the United Sates.” CNN’ s Don
Lemon tells Trump, “That’ s about women being raped, it’ s not about
criminals coming across the border or entering the country.”

Trump: ” Somebody’ s doing the raping, Don.""

“Touche!l,” said Stewart. “| believe we have our campaign slogan:
Trump 2016--Somebody’ s Doing the Raping.""

Immediately after The Daily Show came The Nightly Showwith Larry
Wilmore. He plays the same clip just a slightly bit longer: Trump spouting,
” Somebody’ s doing the raping, Don. | mean, you know, somebody’ s
doing the rapiing, You think the women are being raped. Well, who’ s
doing the raping?” Wilmore repeats: “Who’ s doing the raping? Okay,
who’ s bringing the chips? Who’ s bringing the beer? Wait, wait. Who’ s
doing the raping? Oh, okay, sorry about that. | didn’ t know, | had to ask. |
have to tell you, though, as far as campaign slogans go: Donald Trump
2016--Who’ s Doing the Raping?” Hey, it sounds familiar already.

And on Bill Maher’ s Rea/ Time the reactionary blond witch Ann
Coulter defended Trump: “These aren’ t people we have to have here.
We already have our own rapists and murderers. We don’ t need to be

bringing in more rapists and murderers.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015412
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018330.txt,"system’s functionality.”134 Hackers, they mean, reveal the dangerous holes of our
new world. The bad news is that the worst of them (and often the best of them skill
wise) did this at times by swiping your data, your money and finally your peace of
mind. Their fortunes and safety and curiosity — all of these are woven together in
their hot hunger to touch and pull and break the roots of the network. In a world of
expanding connection, they are both more powerful and more dangerous than ever.

3.

Networked systems of our age are confronted, constantly, with diverse, dangerous
challenges, each informed by that Gordian paradox so familiar to us by now: The
more connected we are, the greater the risks. And as bank balances, secret jet
engine designs, and other priceless digital data are developed and then slipped
safely away on connected machines, the rewards for cracking into the systems grow
- far faster than the (near zero) costs of trying to break in. “It is increasingly
obvious,” security researchers F.X. Lindner and Sandro Gaycken have said, “that the
state of the art in Computer Network Defense is over a decade behind its
counterpart in Computer Network Offense. Even intelligence and military
organizations, considered to be the best positioned to defend their own
infrastructures, struggle to keep the constant onslaught of attackers with varying
motives, skills and resources at bay.”!35 The long list of failed US government
security attempts express a strange digital logic: The more essential it is that an
organization keep a secret, the less it seems able to do so. A decade behind? That is
the gap between a flip phone and an iPhone. In the hyperspeed world of technology
it is like confronting a laser weapon with a hoplite. The losing race slips easily
enough into Donald Rumsfeld’s aheader-behinder dynamic, the one that haunts the
paradoxes of national power we face now. Are we killing more terrorists than the
madrassas are producing? Rumsfeld wondered. We can ask: Are we plugging more
machines with more layers, software and applications than we can protect? Are we
making more bugs than we're patching? (Yes and yes.) “Attackers are not like
natural catastrophes,” Lindner and Gaycken write. “They can analyze their targets.”

Bratus, a math genius who turned to computer science out of curiosity and now
teaches at Dartmouth, has spent a fair amount of time trying to understand just
what happens when a computer or a network is exploited by a hacker, or “pwned” in
the funny idiom of Warez Dudes language. (The phrase means to take control, or to
“own” a system. The spelling is an artifact of an overenthusiastic video-game death
match gloat, in which one player killed another and in his rush to celebrate typed
something along the lines of “I pwned you!” The mis-typing lives today: The highest
award in hacking is known as The Pwnie.) Bratus calls the resulting, pwned device a

134 “Exploit engineers” :Sergei Bratus, et al. “Chapter 13: ‘Weird Machine’ Patterns”
in C. Blackwell and H. Zhu (eds.), Cyberpatterns, Springer International Publishing
Switzerland 2014, p. 13

135 Even intelligence: Felix “F.X” Lidner and Sandro Gaycken, “Back to Basics:
Beyond Network Hygiene”, in Best Practices in Computer Network Defense: Incident
Detection and Response, M.E. Hathaway (Ed.) IOS Press, 2014

98

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018330
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017003.txt,"Lvs)

le-4
1.0 T T T
6 'y | — _ slavery
3
iS)
c
oO
DS O05- 4
o
129 million books . =m a a> i
published
_ | 0.0 \ 1 1
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
Year
12 million BOOKS van, ee News Cc ars r
scanned m3 1884 1943 — the Great War
ss — World War |
1S) — _ World War II
c
oO
3
log
5 million books 2
analyzed Frequency of the rae
word ""apple""
(0)
1800 1850 1914 1939 2000
Year Year

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017003
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011085.txt,"Investors as to interest means lenders, not borrowers. Interest rates published
historically are rates borrowers are contracted to pay. Interest rates realized by
lenders are less for two reasons. There are friction costs of due diligence,
contracting and collection. Default costs, slight when times are good, can be

catastrophic when times are bad.

Homer and Sylla describe normal contracted rates, not realized rates net of those
costs, as 10% — 40% in Sumer and Babylonia, 6% - 18% in ancient Greece, 5% —
24% in Egypt, and 4% — 12+% in Rome and the Byzantine Empire.* After higher
rates in the dark ages, European mortgages and commercial loans found the range
7% — 25% in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The range settled down to
4% — 14% in the sixteenth century,° and to 3% — 10% by the seventeenth and
eighteenth’. The authors comment:® “...interest rates declined during much of the
later Middle Ages and Renaissance. The earliest short-term rates quoted were
somewhat higher than the last and highest of the western Roman Legal limits. They
were not too different from early Greek rates and were within the range of
Babylonian rates... The later Renaissance rates were well within the range of
modern rates and the lowest were far below modern rates in periods of credit
stringency.” Merchants of Venice in Shakespeare’s time and long before borrowed
from banks, not from Shylocks, and at rather lower cost than merchants of the

twentieth century.

Economics and Biology

Bioeconomics has meant economics informed by biology. I argued that this
describes much or all of classical economics from Petty through Mill, then lapsed
when the marginalists preferred to do without any explanations or justifications of

tastes, and revived a century later to explore Hamilton’s rule.

4A History of Interest Rates, Rutgers, 1996, Table 4.
5 Ibid. Tables 6 and 7.

6 Thid. Table 9.

7 Tid. Tables 10 and 14.

8 Ibid. Chapter 10.

Chapter 7 Petty’s Idea 2/3/16 26

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011085
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012734.txt,"Named for James Madison, the fourth president and “father of the Now Live
Constitution,"" this stately hotel has traditional style and refined service -
plus, a location that puts many of Washington's must-see museums and
monuments along the Mall within walking distance. Opened in 1963, the
353-room hotel has hosted the Dalai Lama, the occasional celebrity and
every U.S. president since John F. Kennedy except Barack Obama. But
don't worry - you can stop by the White House, which is just five blocks
away.

Click here to visit sale

Where Esther Williams Meets Chanel

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012734
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018779.txt,"Las Vegas \Vionorail =

Plans for the expansion of the Monorail place the line and potential stops adjacent to the Site. The Las Vegas Monorail is a six-stop, elevated

train system that travels along a 3.9-mile route connecting major hotels and attractions along the Strip. It enables passengers to travel the
length of the resort corridor beginning at the MGM Grand with stops at Bally’s/Paris, Flamingo/Caesars Palace, Harrah’s/Imperial Palace,
Las Vegas Convention Center, the hotel called LVH and ending at the intersection of Sahara Avenue and Las Vegas Boulevard. The train is
capable of transporting 3,200 passengers per hour in each direction and has carried over 50 million passengers.

Circus
Circus

p Hilton Grand
Trump International, ~ Vacations,Club
r . Turnberry Place t
- —<—l Riviera’ a
_

Chinatown

> < Gold Coast e
=I Rio All-Suite Hotel 15 |

Palms Place, @

na Orleans Clarion Hotel@ e 4 /
EN ee Mirage mA |S) aii |) al The Palazzo SPN. (|= Encore mee | Marriott Hotel Las Vegas
The M A : : "" g wl 2 Convention
. 4 “a Caesars Palace - Ain £3 Y 1 26 ” : Center

panera Towers NobuiHotel

Vdara «& Bellagio : s
Aria J ese

(Cosmopolitan &
Monte Carlo A. eee j
4

Mandarin Paris Ballyss |

Orientalag~7< piltecle Mile > Bally’s/Paris Station
, e || fa he @ The Platinum

‘ , @ Elara q
iG arid The Signature
THEhotel yp $ ;

> p we

Uy i rd . a SdHooters Casino Hotel

bad / Je
a =>
E
McCarran International Airport Ic
a b
wy

Four Seasons @
po To Town, Square
B -

Renierance
@ Best Western Mardi Gras
@ Embassy Suites

@

@ Westin Las Vegas
Hilton Grand Vacations Club

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018779
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019467.txt,"From: Darren Indyke

Sent: 1/14/2015 11:43:26 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Bill Clinton pictured with Jeffrey Epstein's social fixer at Chelsea's wedding | Daily Mail Online

Attachments: WebPage.pdf; Untitled attachment 272040.htm

Importance: — High

DARREN K. INDYKE
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Telephone:
Telecopigr:
Mobile:
email:

3 24s 2k 2s 2fe aie fe 2fe aie ie 2fe aie fe 24s aie af aft fe afe oie aie af aft aie fe 2fe aks fe af af af 2fe ais af afc fe 2fe fe ais af afc fe 2fe ake fe af 2h af fe ake fe afc aie aie fe aie ale afc ie aie 2fe ake afe afk ie afc ake ais fe afc ie afc ake ais 2fe 2k 2 afc 2k aie
3 24s 2A 2 2fe 2s fe ofc is 2s 2fe 2k 24s of

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication

or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.

Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2014 Darren K.
Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved.

Be ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee
3s 2k 3s ig 2

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-290698 1/Bill-Clinton-pictured-Jeffrey-Epstein-s-social-fixer-Chelsea-
s-wedding. html

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019467
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014345.txt,"- Continued investments in regulatory costs despite potential regulatory relief.
On the topic of regulation, management noted that it is still too early to know what
type of regulatory relief banks of USB’s size may receive so management has not
slowed down any of its investments in regulatory costs.

« Long term 13.5- 16.5% ROE target unchanged. Despite the outlook for higher
rates, management noted that it was not going to change the range at this point of
time but noted that USB could reach the top end sooner than later if its outlook
proves accurate.

¢ Risk management compliance expenses sustaining at this level. Management
noted that while compliance related expenses could trend lower following the new
administration, it will continue to invest and the impact will likely not be
meaningful.

¢  Interms of innovation projects, 86% of those polled noted that it should
invest In innovations projects that are self-funded. Davis noted that given the
importance of innovation, it would not just self-fund those expenses and would look
to spend money for long term benefits. In terms of its P2P initiative with Zelle,
Davis was optimistic around its growth.

- Interms of potential M&A, management noted that it would look for in market
opportunities and double down where it has scale.

Chart 45: What do you consider to be the most important catalyst for large-cap banks in 2017?

60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

Rising interest | Revenue growth Further Stronger return of Less overhang

rates that’s not interest realignment of capital to from regulatory

rate driven cost structures shareholders and litigation
challenges

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research

Bankof America isa
Merrill Lynch 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 31

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014345
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014423.txt,"BofA Merrill Lynch is aware that the implementation of the ideas expressed in this report may depend upon an investor's ability to ""short"" securities or other financial instruments and that such

action may be limited by regulations prohibiting or restricting ""shortselling"" in many jurisdictions. Investors are urged to seek advice regarding the applicability of such regu

executing any short idea contained in this report.
Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect
effectively assume currency risk.

UK Readers: The protections provided by the U.K. regulatory regime, including the Financial Services Scheme, do not apply in general to business coordinated by BofA Merrill
h policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.
ments linked to securities that may have been recommended in this report. MLPF&S or one of its

located outside of the United Kingdom. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Researc
MLPF&S or one of its affiliates is a regular issuer of traded financial instru
time, hold a trading position (long or short) in the securities and financial
BofA Merrill Lynch, through business units other than Bo
with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in
methods of the persons who prepared them, and BofA Merrill Lynch is un
recipient of this report.

In the event that the recipient received this report pursuant to a contract
therewith ML
beyond the delivery of this report (unless otherwise agreed specifically in
transactions, including transactions in any securities mentioned in this re
Copyright and General Information regarding Research Reports:
Copyright 20

instrum

writing
port.

and client websites and other portals by BofA Merrill Lynch and are not pu
constitutes your agreement not to redistribute, retransmit, or disclose to others tl
recommenda
Materials prepared by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel are ba
information known to, professionals in other business areas of BofA Merri
BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research and certain business groups. As a resul
research reports. To the extent this report discusses any legal proceeding or issue
should consult their own legal advisers as to issues of law relating to the subj
any BofA Merrill Lynch entity and/or its directors, officers and employees may be
on public information. Facts and views presented in this material that relate to an

sed on
I Lynch
, BofA

professionals in other business areas of BofA Merrill Lynch in connection with the
herei

Any information relating to the tax status of financial instruments discussed
seek tax advice based on their particular circumstances from an independent tax

The information herein (other than disclosure information relating to BofA Merril
may contain links to third-party websites. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsible fo

between the recipient and MLPF&S for t
PF&S may be deemed to be acting as an investment adviser, such status relates, if at all, solely to the

6 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. This research report is prepared for the use of Bo

disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch.

ions, estimates or price targets) without first obtaining expressed permiss

ect m

ents discussed in this report.

by MLPF&S). MLPF&S is and continues to ac

BofA Merri

ne con

ion from an authorized officer of BofA Merrill Lynch.
public information. Facts and views presented in this material
, including investment banking personnel. BofA Merrill Lynch
errill Lynch does not disclose certain client relationships witl
5, ithas not been prepared as nor is it intended
atter of this report. BofA Merril
aintiffs, defendants, co-defend
such proceedings have not been reviewed by, discussed with, and may not reflect
egal proceedings or matters relevant to such proceedings.

nis not intended to provide tax
professional.
Lynch and its affiliates) was ob
r the content of any third-party website or any

p
iy

he provision of research services for a separate fee,
person with whom MLPF&S has contracted directly and does not extend
solely as a broker-dealer in connection with tl

‘A Merrill Lynch clients and may not be redistributed, retransmitted or
| Lynch research reports are distributed simul
blicly-available materials. Any unauthorized use or disclosure Is prohibited. Receipt and review of tl
ents, opinions, conclusion, or information contained in this report (including any investment

have not been reviewed by, and may not re
has established information
h, or compensation received from, such issuers in
to express any legal conclusion, opinion or advice. Investors
Lynch Global Research personnel’s knowledge of legal proceedings in which
ants or co-plaintiffs with or involving issuers mentioned in this report is based

ations prior to

he value, price or income of any security or financial instrument mentioned in this report. Investors in such securities and instruments

Lynch entities

affiliates may, at any

‘A Merrill Lynch Global Research, may have issued and may in the future issue trading ideas or recommendations that are inconsistent
his report. Such ideas or recommendations reflect the different time frames, assumptions, views and analytical
der no obligation to ensure that such other trading ideas or recommendations are brought to the a

tention of any
and in connection
he execution of any

aneously to internal
his research report

lect
barriers between

information known to,

advice or to be used by anyone to provide tax advice. Investors are urged to

ained from various sources and we do not guarantee its accuracy. This report
inked content contained in a third-party website. Content

contained on such third-party websites is not part of this report and is not incorporated by reference into this report. The inclusion of a link in this report does not imply any endorsement by or

any affiliation with BofA Merrill Lynch. Access to any third-party website is a
submitting any personal information to them. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsib

All opinions, projections and estimates constitute the judgment of the author as of

e

or such terms and privacy policies and expressly disclaims any liability for them.
he date of the report and are subject to change without notice. Prices also are su

your own risk, and you should always review the terms and privacy policies at third-party websites before

bject to change without

notice. BofA Merrill Lynch is under no obligation to update this report and BofA Merrill Lynch's ability to publish research on the subject issuer(s) in the future is subject to applicable quiet

periods. You should therefore assume that BofA Merrill Lynch will not update any
Certain outstanding reports may contain discussions and/or investment opinions
recent research report relating to an issuer prior to making an investment decisio

inancial instruments) nor should the analyses or opinion(s) be considered a solici

his report or its contents.

nsome cases, an issuer may be classified as Restricted or may be Under Review o
its security and/or financial instruments) to be suspended or withdrawn and shou

act, circumstance or opinion contained in this report.

relating to securities, financial instruments and/or issuers that are no longer curren
n.
r Extended Review. In each case, investors should consider any investment opinion
dnot rely on the analyses and investment opinion(s) pertaining to such issuer (or i
a

. Always refer to the most

relating to such issuer (or
s securities and/or

ion of any kind. Sales persons and financial advisors affiliated with MLPF&S or any of its affiliates may not
solicit purchases of securities or financial instruments that are Restricted or Under Review and may only solicit securities under Extended Review in accordance with
either BofA Merrill Lynch nor any officer or employee of BofA Merrill Lynch accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential damages or losses arising from any use of

irm policies.

14 Japan Economics Viewpoint | 18 November 2016

BankofAmerica <2
Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014423
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019301.txt,"following topics: How to pursue a career of your dream? What makes you feel
empowered? How to build one of a kind brand? How to achieve both self-realization
in professional life and fulfillment personal life?

Our first seminar is going to take place in NYC on April 5"". Consequently, we will be
conducting one seminar every month.

Kathy Ruemmler is going to be the first speaker.

Kathy is an attorney who formerly served as White House Counsel to President
Barack Obama. She previously worked as Principal Deputy White House Counsel.

Kathryn Ruemmler is global co-chair of the white-collar defense and investigations
practice at Latham & Watkins. She rejoined the firm after five years in the Obama
administration, first in the Department of Justice and then as President Obama's chief
lawyer, when she headed a team of around 45 lawyers and staff in the White House
Counsel's office. Obama has said she has “an uncanny ability to see around the
corners that no one else anticipates.” Earlier in her career, Ruemmler was a federal
prosecutor who helped secure the convictions of former Enron executives Kenneth
Lay and Jeff Skilling.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019301
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029872.txt,"apnews.com / JOHNSON LAI HONG KONG (AP) — Police said they
had arrested 13 people after the protests on Monday’s anniversary of

Hong Kong’s return to China, including one man...

Acting DHS chief orders immediate
investigation into offensive posts
allegedly written by Border Patrol
agents

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029872
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026023.txt,"and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026023
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018456.txt,"te OK ok

I was gone for six months, and I returned in heartbreak. A relationship more important
than words can encompass had become -- after years of attempts -- impossible. I think it
was obvious. One friend told me vulnerability was all over me; /ike a scent, I thought,
and wondered if Richard could smell it. In worse shape than ever, I saw Richard and
laughed with an edge to my voice. I gave him doe-eyed looks, but deflected his interest
with doublespeak and icy tones. I wanted him, and I felt the rage returning. I hated and
sheltered behind the unclear verbal games we played. Furious and despairing, I refused to
chase him, yet I felt him everywhere. North.

I had to do something. My identity had somewhat solidified: I was into BDSM. I believed
it, I even accepted it, but I couldn't go on feeling like I did.

In looking around the Internet, I came upon a directory of Kink Aware Professionals,
including therapists who provided their names for people who needed to talk about
BDSM but feared judgment. I visited two. One listened to me silently, with a vaguely
sorrowful expression; he offered no feedback, and left me wondering why he'd listed his
name in the directory. He obviously didn't know what to do with me, and I got the uneasy
feeling that I worried him. Naturally, that didn't help at all.

Luckily, the other was everything I could have asked for -- open, patient, clearly
knowledgeable about BDSM. He looked straight at me and nodded understandingly when
I confessed the whole trail of events; he explained how common my experience was; he
gave me ideas about where to look for more information, but didn't try to put his own
preferences into our talks. ""Most people in your situation feel that they've broken a major
taboo,"" he said. ""A lot try to get away from BDSM. But I'm not hearing that from you.
You want to adjust, not escape."" I nodded, and arranged to see him regularly.

Still, I don't think I could have put myself together again without two other things.

My close friend Andrew went after me at a drunken party. Shades of Richard, | might
have thought, but I never did. Andrew pinned me to the floor, laughed as I fought back,
hurt me, finally kissed me. When I asked in bewilderment what brought this on, he
confessed. ""When you were gone, I missed you,"" he whispered, ""and I've never missed
anyone like that before."" He was as afraid of the darkness of BDSM as I had been, yet
he'd thought of me and found himself fantasizing. He wanted to try it with me, but first he
wanted to be sure that he and I would remain close -- wouldn't lose what we already had.

In everything Andrew told me -- everything we said to each other, laughing, almost in
tears, burying each other in embraces, happily drunk and clear-eyed in the morning -- I
found the things that were missing with Richard. Uncertain about BDSM, guarding his
and my boundaries, Andrew wanted to commit to me and to a devoted monogamous
relationship. Part of me counseled caution and withdrawal, but as my therapist laughingly
put it, Andrew was as tempting as an ice-cream factory. It was my chance to fall
straightforwardly in love.

Soon after that, I had to explain to my parents why I wanted a psychiatrist who was out-
of-network for my health insurance. I closed my eyes as my father asked why I needed
this specialist, what his focus was. ""S&M,"" I said shortly.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018456
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765.txt,"Page 51 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, #922

(b) Closed-Circuit Transmission for Victims. In order to permit victims of crime to watch criminal trial proceedings, the court
may authorize closed-circuit televising of the proceedings for viewing by victims or other persons the court determines have a
compelling interest in doing so.

The Rationale:

The CVRA grants victims the right to attend trials, as noted previously in connection with proposed Rule 43.1. 74° At the same

time, however, the CVRA recognizes that in situations with numerous victims, the court may have to craft ""a reasonable
procedure"" to protect victims’ rights. 34! One such reasonable procedure would appear to be closed-circuit transmission of
court proceedings to a facility sufficiently large to accommodate all the victims. This was the procedure followed in the
Oklahoma City bombing case. *47

[*923] The proposed rule would authorize such transmission in appropriate cases. The language for the proposed rule comes
from 42 U.S.C. /0608(a), which authorizes closed-circuit transmissions ""notwithstanding any provision of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure to the contrary"" in cases in which a proceeding has been transferred more than 350 miles - as was the case
with the Oklahoma City bombing trial. In light of the CVRA's mandate that the court must always craft ""a reasonable
procedure"" to protect the rights of multiple victims, there is no compelling reason to tie the device to such geographical
circumstances. The proposed rule authorizes courts to allow such transmissions in any appropriate case.

Rule 58 - Victims and Petty Offenses
The Proposal:
Courts should hear from victims regarding sentences in petty cases as follows:

Rule 58. Petty Offenses and Other Misdemeanors.

(3) Sentencing. The court must give the defendant an opportunity to be heard in mitigation and then proceed immediately to
sentencing. The court must also give victims an opportunity to be heard. The court may, however, postpone sentencing to allow
the probation service to investigate or to permit either party to submit additional information.

The Rationale:

The CVRA gives a ""victim"" the right to be heard at sentencing. The CVRA defines ""victim"" as including anyone who is
directly and proximately harmed by ""a Federal offense."" *47 The Act does not limit those offenses to felonies or
misdemeanors. Accordingly, a victim has a right to be heard at sentencing for any petty offense, as would be reflected in the
proposed rule.

[*924]
Conclusion

The CVRA commands that victims be made participants in the federal criminal process and thus requires significant changes to
the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This Article has provided one possible and comprehensive way to implement that
congressional command with specific language and supporting analysis for each change. Undoubtedly there are other ways of

340 See supra notes 277-308 and accompanying text.

341 18 USCA. 3771(d)(2).

342 See Paul G. Cassell & Robert F. Hoyt, The Tale of Victims’ Rights, Legal Times, Dec. 23, 1996, at 32; Jo Thomas, Trial to Be Shown in
Oklahoma for Victims, N.Y. Times, Jan. 30, 1997, at A14.

343 18 U.S.C.A. 3771 (e).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023678.txt,"Bloomberg

Bloomberg TV Worldwide

President Xi, China, Economy
Robert Lawrence Kuhn — March 5, 2018

HOST: You were there at the Great Hall of the People. What was
your main takeaway from what some have described as Li

Keqiang’s impossible challenge: how to deleverage, how to take
away stimulus, and still keep 6.5% growth?

RLK: I don’t take the 6.5% growth as the primary objective here.
I mean you have to look at what these National Peoples
Congresses are. They’re not setting the vision and the strategy.
That was set at the party congress in October. What we're dealing
here is the implementation of the policies. If you attend these
every year you know they all look and sound the same because
it’s the same structure, same kind of structure of numbers, so
what you do is look for the differences. What are those subtle
differences between one year and another. That’s what I focus on
at these congresses.

HOST: What’s the main difference you saw?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023678
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024117.txt,"i What is the difference between money laundering and terrorist financing?

In contrast to money laundering, which involves the disguising of funds derived from illegal activity so they may be
used without detection of the illegal activity, terrorist financing can involve the use of legally derived money to carry
out illegal activities. The objective of money laundering is financial gain or the hiding or disguising of illicit proceeds,
whereas with terrorism, the objective is to promote the agenda or cause of the terrorist organization. For example, it
is widely believed that the terrorist activities of September 11, 2001, were partially financed by legally obtained funds
that had been donated to charities. Both money launderers and terrorists, however, do need to disguise the
association between themselves and their funding sources.

8. Is the approach to combat money laundering and terrorist financing the same?

Although some of the risk factors and red flags that apply to other types of money laundering also may apply to
terrorist financing, the patterns of activity tend to be very different. Terrorist financing often involves very small
amounts of funds, which may be moved through charities or nontraditional banking systems, whereas other types of
money laundering may involve large volumes of funds. It is important to understand the different patterns to protect
against the risks.

Overview of U.S. AML Laws and Regulations

9. What are the key U.S. AML laws and regulations?

The key U.S. AML laws and regulations are the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (BSA) and the Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (commonly
referred to as the USA PATRIOT Act).

The BSA was the first major money laundering legislation in the United States. It was designed to deter the use of
secret foreign bank accounts and provide an audit trail for law enforcement by establishing regulatory reporting and
recordkeeping requirements to help identify the source, volume and movement of currency and monetary instruments
into or out of the United States or deposited in financial institutions. For additional guidance on the Bank Secrecy Act,
please refer to the Bank Secrecy Act section.

The USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, following the
terrorist activity of September 11. Title Ill, the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing
Act of 2001, deals with money laundering and terrorist financing. Title III made significant changes to money
laundering regulations, imposed enhanced requirements for AML programs, and significantly expanded the scope of
coverage to nonbank financial institutions. It requires financial institutions to establish AML programs that include
policies, procedures and controls, designation of a compliance officer, training, and independent review. It also
requires, among other things, that certain financial institutions establish customer identification procedures for new
accounts as well as enhanced due diligence (EDD) for correspondent and private banking accounts maintained by
non-U.S. persons. For additional guidance on the USA PATRIOT Act, please refer to the USA PATRIOT Act section.

10. What other AML laws have been enacted in the United States?

In addition to the BSA and Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, other AML laws include the Money Laundering Control
Act of 1986 (MLCA), the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, the Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act of 1992, the
Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1994 (MLSA), and the Money Laundering and Financial Crimes Strategy Act
of 1998.

The MLCA established two AML criminal statutes that, for the first time, made money laundering a criminal offense,
with penalties of up to 20 years and fines of up to $500,000 for each count. Additionally, the MLCA prohibits the
structuring of currency transactions to avoid filing requirements and requires financial institutions to develop BSA
compliance programs.

The primary purpose of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 was to provide funding and technical assistance to state and
local units of government to combat crime and drug abuse. This Act increased the civil and criminal penalties for
money laundering and other BSA violations to include forfeiture of any property or asset involved in an illegal
transaction related to money laundering. It introduced the “sting” provision, which enables law enforcement to
represent the source of funds involved in a transaction as the proceeds of unlawful activity. This Act also required the
identification and recording of purchases of monetary instruments, including bank checks or drafts, foreign drafts,
cashier’s checks, money orders or traveler's checks in amounts between $3,000 and $10,000 inclusive. This
legislation, in conjunction with the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) Reauthorization Act of 1998,

protiviti) | 11

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024117
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020738.txt,"#18

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020738
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015374.txt,"Wednesday--time for our weekly orgy.” The interviewers left in a hurry.
Sheila and Marcia led me up the stairs to my loft bed, and we had a
delicious threesome. It had never happened before, and it would never
happen again.

At one point in our conversation, Groucho somehow got into a
negative space. He was equally cynical about institutions, such as marriage--

“legal quicksand” --and individuals, such as Lyndon Johnson, referred to

as “that potato-head.”

Eventually, | asked, “What gives you hope?”

He thought for a moment. Then he just said one word: “People.”

| told him about the sketch | had written for Steve Allen, “Unsung
Heroes of Television,” with the man whose job it was on You Bet Your Life
to wait for the secret word to be said so that he could drop the duck
down, and Groucho told me about one of his favorite contestants on the
show. “He was an elderly gentleman with white hair, but quite a chipper
fellow. | asked him what he did to retain his sunny disposition. ‘Well, I'll tell
you, Groucho,’ he says, ‘every morning | get up and | make a choice to be
happy that day.’”

Groucho was holding onto his cigar for a long time, but he never

smoked it, he only sniffed it occasionally. “Everybody has their own Laurel

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015374
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033003.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 5/30/2017 7:53:28 PM

To: Landon Thomas as

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-alleged-tax-evasion-italy-

sardinia?CMP=share_btn_fb

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033003
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028447.txt,", “LAentiii1er"":""blockquote™}, ""default
section"": {""backgroundColor""™:""#FFFFFF"",""identifier"":""default

section""}},""componentTexts

tyles"":{""blockquote"":{""fontName"": ""NYTImperial-

Regular"", ""fontSize"":17,""identifier"":""blockquote"", ""lineHeight"":22,""linkStyle"":{""fontSize

"":;17,""textColor™: ""#326891""

}, ""textALlignment™:""lLeft"", ""textColor™:""#909090""}, ""bottom-

banner-body"": {""fontName"":""NYTFranklin-Bold"", ""fontSize"":15, ""identifier"": ""bottom-banner-

body"", ""lineHeig

ht"":45,""lin

:""center"", ""textColor"":""#FFFFFF""}, ""bottom-banner-head"": {""fontName""™: ""NYTFranklin-
Bold"", ""fontSize"":14, ""identifier"": ""bottom-banner-

head"", ""lineHeig
ame"": ""NYTImperial-

hte"" 3 2c, ,.  bek

kStyle""™: {""fontSize""™:15, ""textColor""™:""#3583BC""}, ""textAlignment""

tAlignment""™:""center"", ""textColor™:""#111111""}, ""default"": {""fontN

Regular"", ""fontSize"":17,""identifier"":""default"", ""LineHeight"":24,""linkStyle"":{""textColor"":

""#326891""},""tex

tAlignment™:""left"", ""textColor™:""#222222""},""default-

author"": {""fontName”™: ""NYTCheltenhamSH-Bold"", ""fontSize"":12, ""identifier"": ""default
author"", ""lineHeight"":16, ""textAlignment™: ""left"", ""textColor""™:""#222222""},""default-
body"": {""fontName"": ""NY¥TImperial-

Regular"", ""fontSize"":17, ""hyphenation"":false, ""identifier"": ""default

body"", ""lineHeight"":25, ""textAlignment""™: ""left"", ""textColor""™:""#222222""},""default-

caption"": {""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenhamSH-Regular"", ""fontSize"":12,""identifier"":""default
caption"", ""LineHeight"":15, ""textAlignment""™: ""left"", ""textColor"":""#666666""}, ""default-
heading1"": {""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-Medium"", ""fontSize"":48, ""identifier"": ""default
heading1"", ""lineHeight"":48}, ""default-heading2"": {""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-

Medium"", ""fontSize"":46,""identifier"":""default-heading2"",""lineHeight"":46}, ""default-
heading3"":{""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-Medium"", ""fontSize"":44, ""identifier"": ""default
heading3"", ""lineHeight"":44}, ""default-heading4"": {""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-

Medium"", ""fontSize"":38, ""identifier"": ""default-heading4"", ""lineHeight"":38},""default-
heading5"":{""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-Medium"", ""fontSize"":36, ""identifier"": ""default
heading5"", ""lineHeight"":36}, ""default-heading6"": {""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-

Medium"", ""fontSize"":30,""identifier"":""default-heading6"", ""lineHeight"":30},""default-
title"": {""fontName""™: ""NYTCheltenham-BoldiItalic"", ""fontSize"":44, ""identifier"":""default
title"", ""lineHeight"":46, ""textAlignment"": ""left"", ""textColor"":""#222222""},""footer-

text"": {""fontName""™: ""NYTFranklin-Medium"", ""fontSize"":14, ""identifier"": ""footer-

text"", ""lineHeight"":18, ""textAlignment""™:""lLeft"", ""textColor™:""#222222""},""kicker"":{""fontName
""S""NYTFranklin-

Medium"", ""fontSize"":13,""identifier"": ""kicker"", ""lineHeight"":14,""textTransform"": ""uppercase""

,""tracking"":0.02},""rela

d-coverage"": {""fontName"": ""NYTFranklin-
ntifier""™:""related

Bold"", ""fontSize""™:14,""id

coverage"", ""textTransform

link"": {""fontName”™:""NYTC
link"", ""linkStyle"": {""tex
text-style"": {""fontName""”
Medium"", ""fontSize”™:21,""

W

:""uppercase"", ""tracking"":0.02},""related-
heltenham-Medium"", ""fontSize"":21,""identifier"":""related

tColor™:""#326891""},""textColor™:""#909090""}, ""top-newsletter-promo
:""NYTFranklin-

hyphenation"":false, ""identifier"": ""top-newsletter-promo-text

style"", ""lineHeight"":27,""linkStyle"": {""fontName"":""NYTFranklin-

Medium"", ""fontSize™:21,""

textColor™:""#000""},""textAlignment""™:""center"", ""textColor""™:""#000""},

""yvideo-headline”™: {""fontName™: ""NYTCheltenham-Bold"", ""fontSize"":18, ""identifier"": ""video-

headline"", ""lineHeig
ents"": [{""identifier

wei

itions""™: [{""URL™:""ht
keywords=APPLEMOBIL

ht™:22,""textColor""™:""

anf-divider-1"",
2"",""role""™: ""divider"", ""stroke"": {""color""™:""
tps://www.nytimes.com/newsle

W

layout"": ""Componen

E&region=headeré&ass

rt"":0}, ""type""
i"", ""inilineTex

people,

:""link""}],""identifier"":"" anf-body-
tStyles"": [{""range"":{""lengt
45""}],""layout"":"" defaultComponentLayout"", ""role""

h"":18,""start""™:51}

: ""body"" , W

text
anf-divider-2"",""la

W

SULLIVAN SEPT. 24, 2018
i"", ""layout"":""default-

section"", ""role"":""section"",""™

W

W

anf-cs-2"",""type"":""contai
title"", ""role"": ""ELtle"", ""text.""s

type"": ""section""}, {""components

tLayout-

222222""}},""components"": [{""components""™: [{""compon

FLffff30"", ""width"":""1.0pt""}, ""type™:""line""}, {""add

,""textStyle"":"" anf-ts-
text"":""Make sense of the

issues and ideas shaping the 2018 elections with our new politics
newsletter."",""textStyle"": ""top-newsletter-promo
style"", ""type"": ""text""}, {""identifier"":
3"",""role"": ""divider"", ""stroke"": {""color"":""#f£fffFfL30"", ""width"":""1.0p
ntifier"":""top-newsletter-promo-banner"", ""Layout"": ""ComponentLayout
LY, “eoLée™ i ""eentainer”, ""Style"":
title-1i"", ""layout"":""default-
a€~Fantastica€™ Kavanaugh as He Seeks G.O.P. Votes"", ""type""™:""
author-1"", ""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":16, ""start"":34}
dt""}],""lLayout"":""default-author"", ""role"":""author"",""text"":""By P
,""type™:""text""}],""identifier""™:

yout"": ""ComponentLayout-
EJ } i W type"" : ""line™}

hee}, f{""identa fier” :""
""Trump Stands by

text""}, {""identifier""™:
,'textstyle"": ""pub-

ETER BAKER and EILEEN
""_anf-section-
"":[{""components"": [{""capti

tters/politics?partner=applenewséad
t_ id=100000006123059"", ""range"": {""length"":103,""sta

_anet-

],""ide
"" anf-
on"" . wp

resident Trump offered his latest defense of Judge Brett Kavanaugh amid the sexual

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028447
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021426.txt,"The items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers falsely and inaccurately to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006
where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were respectful
and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim

because | know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was not taken seriously enough to result in any university
action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because | decided | didn’t want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that | was
harassing them? The second part did not happen. Re incident 5: The ‘female companion’ in this case is my wife, who can attest to
the fact that the claim is false, which is what | wrote at the time in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.

It is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,

Re item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me
with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation | DID tell her she was different than the other students in her

year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so | told her
that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as | recall, | did ask her on one of these
occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. | asked, because as a faculty member | was interested in knowing what we could
do, if necessary to encourage more women to go into physics, and also because as someone she had asked for career advice from |
wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. | have gone back over emails from that period. | have
numerous requests from her asking me to go for coffee to talk, which | usually had to turn down because | was busy, and on several
occasions sh specifically asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and | politely declined. | did let her accompany me off
campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. | did and do have coffee and meals with
students on campus, and | see nothing wrong with this. | try to treat even students as respected colleagues if possible. | was shocked
when | later learned of the complaint she was apparently asked to lodge to the University, not least because there was no
inappropriate interaction and also because, well after the dates you listed on which she was apparently offended, she continued to
email me with joking questions or comments. Also, at a later AAAS conference, again in 2008, for which she had asked, and for
which | had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and | gave her a lift in our taxi well out out of our way in order to
drop her off at her hotel, and | note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, | expressed that | would
pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University later informed me of the complaint | was shocked and
concerned. When | spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, | was
told that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed at that time to be called for, and that the young woman in question
had agreed to that. By that time | learned of the complaint | had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at
ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations | had with
my colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because | was already in Arizona at the time | was asked
not to have any further interaction with the student | agreed to that request, both to respect her sensitivities and also because it was
basically moot because | was not on campus. | was also told that because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain
confidential, which |, at least abided by, and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the
complaint from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you.

Re item 6: You report on ASU’s response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never
any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and morever the outside complaints were in fact related
specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual
who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complaint, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged

transgression. | was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both
Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the
University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion
that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. . In addition ANU’s investigation, which took a full month found
significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, | will quote from the ANU report. The initial
complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension of my position at ANU, until it was dismissed, outlined the claim you made
in the words you quoted in your note to me, but it also stated

""It is the University’s understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.”

After the month-long investigation, during which | was told | was not to interact with anyone on campus (again moot because | was a
hemisphere removed) the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim
and apparent later claims as follows in the report, from which | quote:

""The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.

- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in

an unwelcome manner.

- The conference attendee who took the ‘selfie’ photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers
at the time of the incident (November 2016).

- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers
at the time of the incident (November 2016).

The photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.

- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took
the ‘selfie’ photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested
in the course of the investigation.”

(And for the record | often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as | specifically request selfies not to include flashes,
so that | don’t end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021426
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027774.txt,"Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\ root \Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2019-06-13

6H ZUL9-O6-L2 Gt 1.5.57. 33 .LeGhat

Service: iMessag

Start Time: 06/12/19 12:55:49 PM (582062149)
End Time: 06/13/19 07:19:15 PM (582171555)
Last Message ID: 30665

Chat Room:

Presentity IDs: ©: jeeitunes¢gnai2.com, [I

Messages -

Time: 06/12/19 12:55:49 PM (582062149)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

Pe

GUID: A88D2BA8-B895-46A4-BEE4-B3F6FFB69FD1

Message: On the train to NY. Just met your friend POTUS.

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/12/19 12:56:33 PM (582062193)
Flags: 1093637

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 089C232F-5E65-4F61-82F0-FBFCOBIF63C

Ez

Message: See if you still have your wallet

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/12/19 12:56:59 PM (582062219)
Flags: 1093637

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: BOE20683-7E5C-410C-89B1-2D3B7FBBEF89

Message: Im sitting here with Steve

Time: 06/12/19 12:57:33 PM (582062253)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: CF615E3C-8E82-4792-BB29-D670D38 95266

Message: Say hello. And I've not got so much too lose as you

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027774
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024634.txt,"U.S. Legalized Cannabis Market

$140,000 Path to Federal Legalization 70M
$120,000 FDA Approves Cannabis-Derived Pharmaceuticals 60M
More States Adopt Medical Cannabis Laws
$100,000 "" 50M
More States Adopt Recreational Laws =
3
‘@ $80,000 FDA Routinely Approves CBD Drugs 40M &
2 mal
= FDA Routinely Approves THC Drugs 2
# $60,000 30M B
Federal Government Legalizes Cannabis 3
$40,000 20M °
$20,000 10M
so | OM

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
| | | Legalized Cannabis Market Size === Consumers

Source: Ackrell Capital. Assumes cannabis will be legalized federally by 2027. Cannabis may never be legalized federally in the United States.

Cannabis Industry Segments

E Proaveon d Business Business
a aie an Software Services
Supplies

Distribution Digital Media

Online Content Online
and Networking Directories

Consumer Products

Vaporizers and
Accessories

[| Involves “touching the plant” | Does not involve “touching the plant’

© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024634
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022566.txt,"Guiding Principles
of Enforcement

and reference checks; ensuring that the contract spells out exactly what services and deliverables (such as written status
reports or other documentation) Consultant is providing; training Consultant on the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws;
requiring Consultant to represent that he will abide by the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws; including audit rights in the
contract (and exercising those rights); and ensuring that payments requested by Consultant have the proper supporting
documentation before they are approved for payment.

Part 2: Distributors and Local Partners

Assume the following alternative facts:

Instead of hiring Consultant, Company A retains an often-used local distributor (Distributor) to sell Company A's
products to the Ministry of Immigration. In negotiating the pricing structure, Distributor, which had introduced the project
to Company A, claims that the standard discount price to Distributor creates insufficient margin for Distributor to cover
warehousing, distribution, installation, marketing, and training costs and requests an additional discount or rebate, or, in
the alternative, a contribution to its marketing efforts, either in the form of a lump sum or as a percentage of the total
contract. The requested discount/allowance is significantly larger than usual, although there is precedent at Company
A for granting this level of discount in unique circumstances. Distributor further advises Company A that the Ministry's
procurement officials responsible for awarding the contract have expressed a strong preference for including a particular
local company (Local Partner) in the transaction as a subcontractor of Company A to perform installation, training, and
other services that would normally have been performed by Distributor or Company A. According to Distributor, the
Ministry has a solid working relationship with Local Partner, and it would cause less disruption for Local Partner to perform
most of the on-site work at the Ministry. One of the principals (Principal 1) of the Local Partner is an official in another

government ministry.

What additional compliance considerations do these alternative facts raise?

As with Consultant in the first scenario above, Company A should carefully vet Distributor and Local Partner and their
roles in the transaction in order to minimize the likelihood of incurring FCPA liability. While Company A has an established
relationship with Distributor, the fact that Distributor has requested an additional discount warrants further inquiry into
the economic justification for the change, particularly where, as here, the proposed transaction structure contemplates
paying Local Partner to provide many of the same services that Distributor would otherwise provide. In many cases, it may
be appropriate for distributors to receive larger discounts to account for unique circumstances in particular transactions.
That said, a common mechanism to create additional margin for bribe payments is through excessive discounts or rebates
to distributors. Accordingly, when a company has pre-existing relationships with distributors and other third parties,
transaction-specific due diligence—including an analysis of payment terms to confirm that the payment is commensurate
with the work being performed—can be critical even in circumstances where due diligence of the distributor or other third
party raises no initial red flags.

Company A should carefully scrutinize the relationship among Local Partner, Distributor, and Ministry of Immigration
officials. While there is nothing inherently illegal about contracting with a third party that is recommended by the end-user,
or even hiring a government official to perform legitimate services on a transaction unrelated to his or her government
job, these facts raise additional red flags that warrant significant scrutiny. Among other things, Company A would be
well-advised to require Principal 1 to verify that he will have no role in the Ministry of Immigration’s decision to award
the contract to Company A, notify the Ministry of Immigration and his own ministry of his proposed involvement in the
transaction, and certify that he will abide by the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws and that his involvement in the
transaction is permitted under local law.

(cont’d)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022566
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018442.txt,"I powered this ebook almost entirely with my own strangely obsessive energy, so you can
blame me for any mistakes. If you find coding errors, broken internal links, or whatever,
then I invite you to email me and let me know so I can update the file! I'm available at
clarisse.thom@gmail.com.

This is version 1.2 of The S&M Feminist. The resource list, glossary, and formatting
have all been updated.

TK OK ok

BDSM Resources

BDSM is a 6-for-4 deal of an acronym that stands for Bondage, Discipline, Dominance,
Submission, Sadism, and/or Masochism. Some people call it S&M, B&D, leather, fetish,
or kink. BDSM can mean very different things to different people, and there are a lot of
activities that can fall under the BDSM umbrella; such activities might include spanking,
Master/slave role-playing, handcuffs, cages, rape fantasies, razor blades, or all kinds of
other things.

I mention a lot of resources in the articles that I've included in this book, but I wanted to
include an overview at the beginning, too.

Hands down, I believe that one of the most important resources within the BDSM
community is the Kink Aware Professionals list. If you are seeking medical, legal or
other professional help for a problem that is influenced by alternative sexuality, there is
probably someone on the list who can help you. When I was going through my own
complicated and difficult BDSM coming-out process, I tried two therapists from the KAP
list. One of them didn't really get me, but the second was wonderfully helpful -- so, if
you're looking for a therapist, don't be afraid to shop around until you find the right fit.
The list is here: https://ncsfreedom.org/resources/kink-aware-professionals-directory/kap-
directory-homepage.html

Want more information on how BDSM interfaces with the psychiatric establishment?
I've compiled the research here: http://clarissethorn.com/blog/2012/05/07/the-
psychology-of-sm/

Books

In 2012, the legendary educator Tristan Taormino released The Ultimate Guide To Kink:
BDSM, Role Play and the Erotic Edge, which is supposed to be amazing. I haven't read it
myself, though.

My personal favorite beginner BDSM books are The New Topping Book and The New
Bottoming Book, by Dossie Easton and Janet W. Hardy. If you look for those books on
Amazon.com, you will also see a lot of interesting related books in the ""Customers Who
Bought This Item Also Bought"" section. I remember liking Jay Wiseman's SM/01/,
although I know some people who have mixed feelings about it; a number of people
recommend Screw The Roses, Send Me The Thorns by Philip Miller and Molly Devon,
but I've never read it myself.

If you're thinking of coming out to a loved one, I recommend the book When Someone

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018442
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017771.txt,"EXHIBIT 8

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017771
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024103.txt,"Sprout Capital VII, L.P. (Healthcare Technology Portfolio)

$ amounts in millions, as of March 31, 2014
Please refer to Endnotes 1,],K,L,M and N in this Appendix.

Gross
Multiple Gross
Vintage Total Realized Unrealize Total (Realized Multiple
Company Sector Year Cost Value d Value Value Portion) (Total) Gross IRR

All Investments

Allos Therapeutics, Inc. herapeutics

AviaHealth, Inc. (fka GoToMyDoc) Convergence 2000 2.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.02 0.02 -92.8%
Cephalon, Inc. Therapeutics 1999 5.1 25.6 - 25.6 5.01 5.01 293.2%
Charles River Laboratories Diagnostics & Infrastructure 1999 43 22.7 - 22.7 5.23 5:23 121.6%
Deltagen, Inc. Therapeutics 1998 19.9 41 - 41 0.20 0.20 -30.3%
eHealth, Inc. Convergence 1999 11.3 20.3 - 20.3 1.80 1.80 7.7%
Gantech International, Inc. Therapeutics 1999 2.8 - - - - - NM
Keravision Inc. Healthcare Devices 1998 10.2 - - - - - NM
Microban International, Ltd. Diagnostics & Infrastructure 1999 14.8 39.7 - 39.7 2.68 2.68 14.5%
Nuvelo, Inc. (fka Variagenics, Inc.} Therapeutics 1999 11.8 24.8 - 24.8 2.10 2.10 13.9%
NxStage Medical, Inc. Healthcare Devices 1999 17.8 50.3 - 50.3 2.83 2.83 14.2%
Phase Forward Incorporated Convergence 1998 9.0 38.6 - 38.6 4.31 4.31 22.4%
SGX, Inc. Therapeutics 2000 15.0 1.6 - 1.6 0.11 0.11 -35.3%
Skila, Inc. Convergence 1998 9.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.00 0.00 NM
Spotfire, Inc. Convergence 1999 99 24.8 - 24.8 2.50 2.50 12.7%
VascA, Inc. Healthcare Devices 1999 7 0.1 - 0.1 0.02 0.02 NM
VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. Healthcare Devices 1999 3.8 111 - 11.1 2.90 2.90 12.7%
Total Sprout Capital VII, L.P. (HCT) Investments $ 157.5 §$ 273.7 $ - $ 273.7 1.74 1.74 10.1%

92 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024103
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033017.txt,"Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After
Trump’s Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget
Cuts

www.huffingtonpost.com

The famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, once
said, “The good thing about science is that it's true, whether or
not you believe in ...

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Stanley Rosenberg [in wrote:

Dear Jeffrey,

can you please tell me about your interest in the vagus nerve? Why is the vagus nerve important to you?
Perhaps you can refer me to web site where | can learn more about your take on it.

best wishes,

Stanley

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by

return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033017
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015360.txt,"Remembering Lenny Bruce

August 3, 2016 marked the 50™ anniversary of groundbreaking
comedian Lenny Bruce’ s death from an overdose of morphine, while his
New York obscenity conviction at Café Au Go Go was still on appeal. On
that same day he received a foreclosure notice at his Los Angeles home.

But it wasn’ t a suicide. In the kitchen, a kettle of water was still
boiling, and in his office, the electric typewriter was still humming. He had
stopped typing in mid-word: “Conspiracy to interfere with the 4""
Amendment const” ...constitutes what, | wondered.

Lenny was a subscriber to my satirical magazine, 7he Realist and in
1959 we met for the first time at the funky Hotel America in Times Square.
He was amazed that | got away with publishing those profane words for
which other periodicals used asterisks or dashes. He had been using
euphemisms like “frig” and asked, “Are you telling me this is legal to
sell on the newsstands?”

| replied, “The Supreme Court's definition of obscenity is that it has
to be material which appeals to your prurient interest.” He magically
produced an unabridged dictionary from the suitcase on his bed, and

looked up the word “prurient.” He closed the dictionary, clenching his

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015360
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021432.txt,"° Online, people can buy T-shirts emblazoned “Lawrence Krauss for President.”

° In talks and interviews, you have argued that our universe arose without divine intervention, that
religion drives xenophobia, and that our brains are hardwired to believe.

° You have stated that science provides answers to many of life’s biggest questions, and can even fix
great societal injustices.

° Earlier this year, at a Q&A event to promote your new book, the conversation came around to the
dearth of women and minorities in science. “Science itself overcomes misogyny and prejudice and bias,” you
said. “It’s built in: Questioning yourself, always questioning results, questioning others, relying on empirical
evidence.”

° You have clashed with some skeptics over your defense of Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire financier who in
2008 was convicted for soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and spent 13 months in a Florida jail.

° Through his private foundation, Epstein has funded the work of several prominent scientists. He has
provided funding for your Origins Project, supporting lectureship and scholarship programs, most recently
pledging $100,000 in 2014.

° In April 2011, you told the Daily Beast: “As a scientist | always judge things on empirical evidence and
he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I’ve never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my
presumption is that whatever the problems were | would believe him over other people.”

° In a blog comment about the Epstein controversy, you wrote: “I remain skeptical, and | support a man
whose character | believe I know...If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.”

° You were made an honorary member of CFI’s board of directors in December 2011.

° A blog post published in August 2013 described incidents #1 and #4, naming you. Another post,
published at around the same time, described incident #5.

° The first post was edited to remove your name after you had commented that the allegations of assault
were “potentially illegal.” The second post was quickly taken down.

Again, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as
possible. If | do not respond immediately it is because | am on another call, so please leave the best phone
number to reach you.

Thanks,
Peter Aldhous

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021432
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028453.txt,"{""componentLayouts"": {""ComponentLayou

t-

1"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""start"":0},""contentInset"": {""bottom"": false, ""left"":true, ""ri
ght"":true, ""top"": false}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-—

i"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""both"", ""ma
Layout-10"":{""columnRange"": {""length""
10"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""24.0pt"", ""top
1i"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":7, ""star
11"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""24.0pt"", ""top
12"":{""columnRange""™:{""length"":7, ""star
12"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""16.0pt"", ""top

m E

n

13"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":7, ""star
13"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""0.0pt"", ""top""
16"":{""columnRange""™:{""length"":8, ""star

rgin"": {""bot

:8,""start™:0
""s""0.O0pt""}},

16"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""both"", ""margin"": {""bo

W

tLayout-2"":{""columnRange"": {""length
2"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""none"",""
tLayout-3"":{""columnRange"": {""length
3"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""none"", ""ma

ma

W

:8,""start™:0

:8,""start""™:0

rgin"":{""bo

rgin"": {""bot

tom"": ""25.0pt"", ""top™:""0.0pt""}}, ""Component
}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-

""ComponentLayout-—
t"":0}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-
""s""6.0pt""}}, ""ComponentLayout-—
t"":0}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-—
""s""0.0pt""}}, ""ComponentLayout-—
t"":0}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-
:""16.0pt""}}, ""ComponentLayout-—
t"":0}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-—

ttom™:""0.0pt"", ""top™:""14.0pt""}}, ""Componen
}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-
tom"": ""15.0pt"", ""top""™:""28.0pt""}}, ""Componen
}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-
tom"": ""28.0pt"", ""top""™:""20.0pt""}},"" default

ComponentLayout"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""start"":0},""identifier"":"" defaultComponentL

ayout""}, ""blockquote-

body"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":6, ""start"":1}, ""contentInset"": {""bottom"": true, ""left"":true,""
:""blockquote-

body"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""0.0pt"", ""top™:""0.0pt""}}, ""blockquote-

container"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":7,""start"":0},""contentInset"":{""bottom"":true, ""left ™:t

right"":true, ""top"":true}, ""identifier""

rue, ""right"":true, ""top"":true}, ""identifier"": ""blockquote-

container"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""28.0pt"", ""top""™:""0.0pt""}}, ""bottom-banner-

body"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":8, ""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""bottom-banner-

body"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""30.0pt"", ""top™:""0.0pt""}, ""minimumHeight"":""38.0pt""}, ""bottom-
banner-head"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":8, ""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""bottom-banner-

head"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""13.0pt"", ""top""™:""16.0pt""}}, ""defau
ilt-author"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":7,""start"":0},""identifier"":""default

author"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""24.0pt"", ""top"": ""8.0pt""}}, ""default-

body"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":7,""start"":0},""id
body"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""24.0pt"", ""top"":""0.0pt""}},""default-

caption"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,

W

ntifier"":""default

start™:0},""identifier""™: ""default

caption"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""0.0pt"", ""top"": ""2.0pt""}}, ""default-

gallery"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,
gallery"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""10.0pt""
section"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,

W

start""™:0},""identifier""™: ""default

,""top™:""0.0pt""}},""default-—

W

Start"":0},""identifier"":""default

section"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin""™:""both""}, ""default-

title"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8, ""start "":0},""identifier"":""default

title"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""0.0pt"", ""top"":""10.0pt""}}, ""fullbleed-

image"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""fullbleed-

image"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""both"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""10.0pt"", ""top""™:""2.0pt""}}, ""headi
ngl"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":7, ""start "":0},""identifier"":""headingl"", ""ignoreDocumentMargi

W

n

:""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""15.0pt"", ""top™:""0.0pt""}}, ""heading3"": {""columnRange""™: {""lengt

h"":8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""heading3"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom
""s""15.0pt"", ""top"": ""0.0pt""}}, ""heading4"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":7,""start"":0}, ""identifier

W

:""heading4"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""15.0pt"", ""top"": ""10.0pt""}}

,""image-container"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""image-
container"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""both"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""28.0pt"", ""top""™:""0.0pt™}}, ""i
nset""™:{""columnRange"":{""length"":7, ""start "":0},""identifier"":""inset""},""interactive-promo-
headline"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":7,""start"":0},""identifier"":""interactive-promo-
headline"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""4.0pt"", ""top™:""0.0pt""}}, ""kicker"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":
8, ""start "":0},""identifier"":""kicker"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""0.0pt"", ""top™:""8.0pt""}},""small-
caption"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":7,""start"":0},""identifier"":""small-

caption"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""2.0pt"", ""top"": ""2.0pt""}},""small-

image"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":7,""start"":0},""identifier"":""small-

image"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""10.0pt"", ""top""™:""0.0pt""}}, ""video"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""
start"":0},""identifier"": ""video"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin""™: ""both"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""0.0pt""

,'top™:""0.0pt""}}},""componentStyles""™:

{""_anf-cs-

1"":{""backgroundColor"":""#F7F7F7"",""identifier"":"" anf-cs-1""},"" anf-cs-
2"":{""backgroundColor"":""#7aa2bi"",""identifier"":"" anf-cs-2""},"" anf-cs-
B32 {""Fi11"":{""fillMode"": ""fit"", ""horizontalAlignment"": ""center"", ""imageIdentifier"":""f£589f096
3b351d47bf2abea9b6a4eod9d2"", ""type"": ""image"", ""verticalAlignment"":""center""},""identifier"":"" a

nf-cs-

3™},""blockquote""™: {""border""™: {""left"":{""color""™:""#

E2E2E2"", ""style"": ""solid"", ""width"":""1.0pt™}}

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028453
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027760.txt,"Message: I don't believe so , but I can tell you that had he been referring to me or

you , and said I preserved th vidence so that if a time comes when you can defend
yourself. It could be used. Im not sure id get a good night sleep
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/29/19 01:41:08 PM (580855268)
Flags: 1150981
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: OAOF6B28-225B-4508-9560-S552BOF52270C

Message: Are we set for sat afternoon or Sunday. Your call

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/29/19 02:13:23 PM (580857203)
Flags: 1150981

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: EF8CAS5SA9-DBD4-4E78-8270-554352902EA9

|

Message: https://www.npr.org/2019/05/29/727850485/plenty-of-cards-to-play-chines
media-suggest-cutting-rar arth-exports-to-u-s

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/01/19 09:51:01 AM (581100661)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 365EB4B7-7C81-4983-9599-1A67182EBF4B

Message: Eta?

Time: 06/01/19 09:52:04 AM (581100724)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: AAEO77B4-29A2-45CB-8815-87688A78D7B3

Message: Inbound eta 130

sender:

Time: 06/01/19 09:52:28 AM (581100748)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 3BDA577F-DD8C-411C-A51D-9B57CBE10AB7

Message: Exactly time the shot is fixed

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027760
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024620.txt,"29

Nations General Assembly which issued in November 26, 1947 a
resolution dividing Palestine into two states: A Jewish state
consisting of 54 percent of the territory of Palestine, an Arab state
consisting of 44 percent of that territory, and the Jerusalem Area, as a
Corpus Separatum, consisting of 2 percent of Palestine.
Furthermore, the Resolution decided to have an Economic Union
between the two states and stipulated that the Jerusalem Area, which
included Bethlehem, should be a separate area under the control of
the UN.

The Zionist leadership pretended to accept the resolution, relying on
the fact that it would be refused by the reactionary Arab leadership.
After the UN Resolution, clashes broke out among the two
communities. The armed Zionist organizations, well prepared and
organized, as well as heavily armed, defeated the poorly armed
Palestinians and the weak unorganized Arab armies.

They occupied and annexed 70 percent of Jerusalem and 50 percent
of the territory allocated to the Arab State, and on May 15, 1948,
declared the State of Israel on 78 percent of historical Palestine
territory, leaving the Palestinians without a state and in limbo.

All these events happened in collusion among the colonial British
government, the Jewish Agency and some Arab regimes, ruled and/or
controlled by the British.

Aftermath of the 1948 War

As mentioned above, there was an enlarged Jewish state [Israel], but
the remaining territories of Palestine were either annexed to Jordan
[The West Bank], or put under Egyptian rule [The Gaza Strip].

So, the Palestinian people, who constituted 67 percent of the
population of Palestine in 1947 and owned 93 percent of its land,
were betrayed and left in a state of destitution.

Sixty-two percent of them were driven out of their home under
gunpoint and in several massacres committed by armed Zionist

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024620
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022572.txt,"or debarment from contracting with the federal government,
cross-debarment by multilateral development banks, and the

suspension or revocation of certain export privileges.

Debarment

Under federal guidelines governing procurement,
an individual or company that violates the FCPA or other
criminal statutes may be barred from doing business with the
federal government. The Federal Acquisition Regulations
(FAR) provide for the potential suspension or debarment
of companies that contract with the government upon
conviction of or civil judgment for bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, the making of false statements, or
“[cJommission of any other offense indicating a lack of busi-
ness integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly
affects the present responsibility of a Government contrac-
tor or subcontractor.” These measures are not intended
to be punitive and may be imposed only if “in the public’s
interest for the Government's protection.”*“

Under the FAR, a decision to debar or suspend is dis-
cretionary. The decision is not made by DOJ prosecutors or
SEC staff, but instead by independent debarment authorities
within each agency, such as the Department of Defense or
the General Services Administration, which analyze a num-
ber of factors to determine whether a company should be sus-
pended, debarred, or otherwise determined to be ineligible
for government contracting, Such factors include whether
the contractor has effective internal control systems in place,
self-reported the misconduct in a timely manner, and has
taken remedial measures.*® If a cause for debarment exists,
the contractor has the burden of demonstrating to the satis-
faction of the debarring official that it is presently responsible
and that debarment is not necessary.** Each federal depart-
ment and agency determines the eligibility of contractors
with whom it deals. However, if one department or agency
debars or suspends a contractor, the debarment or suspension
applies to the entire executive branch of the federal govern-
ment, unless a department or agency shows compelling rea-
sons not to debar or suspend the contractor?”

Although guilty pleas, DPAs, and NPAs do not result

in automatic debarment from U.S. government contracting,

FCPA Penalties,
Sanctions, and
Remedies

committing a federal crime and the factual admissions
underlying a resolution are factors that the independent
debarment authorities may consider. Moreover, indictment
alone can lead to suspension of the right to do business
with the government.* The US. Attorney’s Manual also
provides that when a company engages in fraud against the
government, a prosecutor may not negotiate away an agen-
cy’s right to debar or delist the company as part of the plea

bargaining process.

In making debarment determina-
tions, contracting agencies, including at the state and local
level, may consult with DOJ in advance of awarding a con-
tract. Depending on the circumstances, DOJ may provide
information to contracting authorities in the context of
the corporate settlement about the facts and circumstances
underlying the criminal conduct and remediation measures
undertaken by the company, if any. This information shar-
ing is not advocacy, and the ultimate debarment decisions
are squarely within the purview of the independent debar-
ment authorities. In some situations, the contracting agency
may impose its own oversight requirements in order for a
company that has admitted to violations of federal law to be
awarded federal contracts, such as the Corporate Integrity
Agreements often required by the Department of Health

and Human Services.

Cross-Debarment by Multilateral Development
Banks

Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), like the
World Bank, also have the ability to debar companies and
individuals for corrupt practices.” Each MDB has its own
process for evaluating alleged corruption in connection
with MDB-funded projects. When appropriate, DOJ and
SEC work with MDBs to share evidence and refer cases.
On April 9, 2010, the African Development Bank Group,
the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022572

"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014437.txt,"its 2% core PCE target. Our economists think that the Fed may well aim a little high in
the short term on inflation to ensure they have sufficient room to ease in the event of a
downturn. However, it is unlikely that the Fed would tolerate a sustained overshoot of
their inflation objective. That is particularly the case if the Fed under President Trump is
made more hawkish as our economists think it probably will be (see Liquid Insight:
Trump’s stamp on the FOMC).

Chart 5: US 5Y5Y forward inflation back towards 2.5% Chart 6: Euro 5Y5Y forward inflation up to 1.6%
33 28
3.1 2.6
29 24
27 2.2
25 2
23 1.8
2.1 1.6
19 = US 5y5y fwd inflation swap 14
17 1.2
PECK EE ie ee ee
Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

Equally, our economists in Europe are sceptical on the ECB’s ability to get inflation to
rise significantly from current levels. Optically there is scope for European breakevens
to head higher if the ECB were to be successful but investors are likely to want to see
some evidence of rising inflation first before they price that in. We will return to this
below. For now we agree with our fixed income strategists that the rise in inflation
expectations is probably sufficient and that any rise in yields from here has to be one of
higher real yields.

They think such a rise as a tightening of monetary conditions which may be self-limiting
in the short term, particularly as the fiscal boost in the US is likely to be back loaded in
terms of 2017. If rates move too quickly and the USD follows before the fiscal stimulus
kicks in they could actually dampen growth. Indeed, our US economists have shaved
their near term growth forecasts already to reflect the current moves. They do not
expect the fiscal stimulus to start to boost growth before the 3” quarter.

Fiscal + hawkish Trump Fed means we stay short 5Y US via 2-5-10 butterfly

Our fixed income team estimated how much fair values of the different parts of the
curve would have to move were the market to move into line with the dot plot. Updating
those estimates for the move since their publication we find 2Y rates can move another
11bp, 5Y 39bp and 10Y 33bp. They argue that given we are past the inflection point for
rates, with fiscal policy being eased and now with a more hawkish Fed under Trump
likely, the dot plot should form the floor not the ceiling for rate expectations. All of this
translates into a view that 10Y yields can push to 2.65% by the second half of 2017.
Given their views on the curve we continue to run the 2-5-10 butterfly. It has moved
from around -10bp to +10bp since the election, and our fixed income strategists have
moved their target to +20bp.

BankofAmerica <2”

6 Global Cross Asset Strategy - Year Ahead | 30 November 2016 Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014437
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019315.txt,"please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019315
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013358.txt,"105. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have
you ever socialized-with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jd. at
: 106. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have
you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz im the — of females under the age of 18.” Jd. at
: 107. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have
+i ever socialized with Mr. Mottola in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jd. at 91-
108. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Did you

ever socialize with David Copperfield in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Jd. at

109. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have
- ever socialized with Mr. Richardson [Governor of New Mexico and formerly USS.
Representative and ‘Ambassador to the United Nations] in the presence of females under the age
of 18.” Id. at 94.

| 110. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have
you ever sexually abused children?” Jd. at 95.

111. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Did you
have staff members that assisted you in scheduling appointments with underage females; that is,
females under the age of 18.” Jd. at 97-98.

112. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “On how

many occasions did you solicit prostitution.” Jd. at 102.
| 40

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013358
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029866.txt,"Flipboard Week in Review [editorialstaff@flipboard.com]
7/6/2019 6:57:33 PM

jeevacation@gmail.com
U.S. celebrates Fourth of July, Trump-Kim DMZ meeting and Hong Kong protests

Flipboard

With Flyovers and Flags, Trump Plays
M.C. for the Fourth

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029866
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026037.txt,"From: Paul Schulte <

Date: 12 December 2016 at 4:10:08 PM GMT+8

To: Paul Schulte <3 iT

Subject: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO
NOT FORWARD)

Los

SY

CONTACT US

Paul Schulte
Founder, Schulte Research

DEEP DIVES INTO PRC FIN TECH OWNERSHIP AND TRUMP
CABINET OWNERSHIP. (DO NOT FORWARD)

Gavin Liu
Senior Analyst

¢ H SHARES: PING AN, CICC AT CENTER OF ALIBABA, TENCENT

PHENOMENON. BUY. SELL AIA. IND-X Advisors Limited
Kinwick Centre, 8°"" Floor
¢ TRUMP CHOICES ARE ALL ABOUT KOCH BROS & OIL/GAS a se ai Road
entra

NETWORK: BUY RUSSIA... ALSO SAUDI BANKS.
Hong Kong

e INVESTOR FEEDBACK: INFLATION COMING. BUY BOMBED

OUT BANKS HSBC, KB, UNICREDIT? GROWING AGREEMENT ON
BOOM IN US. BUY CITI, JPM.

Schulte Research Report, ED 164: Slides

1. Ping An & CICC are the 2 H shares that operate in the middle of Alibaba, Tencent, Lufax.

A. The chart below represents a deep dive we did on the new world of Chinese banking. Companies
like Zhong An, WeBank and Lufax will grow dramatically and will take advantage of (as well as
support) the massive worlds of Alibaba and Tencent. Together, Alibaba and Tencent have market cap
of $500 bn. Popping up in many of these areas of overlap are Ping An and CICC. They are
strategically placed to make great strides in China. This is slowly being recognized in the case of Ping
AN (See Page 8 of attached PPT). Ping An's market cap is $97 bn. It is connected to Zhong An.. It
owns 44% of Lufax. And some if its management were the very ones that started WeBank. It is
perfectly positioned for the coming boom in new banking. It has the best combined ROA and ROE
globally and its P/E of 10x is trading on a 50% discount to the global averages. Why is Ping An
trading at a discount to AIA? BUY PING AN -- SELL AIA..

B. The other company which has the best return on capital of any broker dealer -- and is also

positioned nicely for the coming boom in the new era of banking in China -- is CICC. CICC and CDH
(a CICC breakaway) both invested in Zhong An and Lufax. CICC has vision and a proven track record.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026037
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030408.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 8/8/2018 3:08:21 PM 
To: Steve Bannon 
Subject: Re: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat 
https://www.klearwaterstore.com/davey-bt14-30-torrium2-booster-
pump/?gclid=CjwKCAjwhqXbBRAREiwAucoo-6Wkrv3ZIfqAkk86XcrX90zIV-2dsIdyWpJWa041skPP9fCr7-
zUfxoCXUoQAvD BwE ? passing along not covered >? 
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Steve Bannon wrote: 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Anders Corr <M11111> 
Date: August 8, 2018 at 5:32:57 AM EDT 
To: Fanell Red 
>, Authoritarian Influence <MIM 
Subject: Reuters: China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat 
Reply-To: 
From Reuters News: 
China defends Iran business ties after Trump threat 
http ://www.reuters. com/article/us-iran-nuclear-china/china-defends-iran-business-ties-after-trump-threat-
idUSKBN1KTOTU  
China's business ties with Iran are open, transparent and lawful, its foreign ministry said on Wednesday, after 
U.S. President Donald Trump said companies doing business with Iran would be barred from the United 
States. 
This service is not intended to encourage spam. The details provided have been used for the sole purpose of 
facilitating this email communication and have not been retained by Thomson Reuters. 
Reminder, never post any FOUO information to this group. 
Disclaimer: Posting of articles to Red Star Rising does not indicate endorsement of the arguments or 
verification of the data contained in the piece. It only means that the sender finds it of value to further 
understanding of the Indo-Asia-Pacific region and recommends that you read it. 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Fanell's Red Star Rising"" group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 
To post to this group, send email to . 
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fanell-red-star-rising. 
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fanell-red-star-
rising/CAEn6kiNCeXiyh%3DwQZztE7t0D8CondVxc4eMW8u40%2B1VFz86%3Dtg%40mail.gmail.com 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030408 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030409 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012720.txt,"Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 85-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 3 of 4

S3608

U.S. SENATE,
Washington, DC, June 6, 2011.
Hon. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr.,
Attorney General; U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC.

DEAR ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER: I am
writing about the Justice Department’s im-
plementation of the Crime Victims’ Rights
Act--an act that I co-sponsored in 2004.
These questions relate to an Office of Legal
Counsel (“OLC’’?) Opinion made public on
May 20, 2011 and more broadly to concerns I
have heard from crime victims’ advocates
that the Department has been thwarting ef-
fective implementation of the Act by failing
to extend the Act to the investigative phases
of criminal cases and by preventing effective
appellate enforcement of victims’ rights. I
am writing to ask you to answer these ques-
tions and explain the Department’s actions
in these areas.

GOVERNMENT PROTECTION OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS
DURING INVESTIGATION OF A CRIME

When Congress enacted the CVRA, it in-
tended to protect crime victims throughout
the criminal justice process—from the inves-
tigative phases to the final conclusion of a
case. Congress could not have been clearer in
its direction that using ‘“‘best efforts’’ to en-
force the CVRA was an obligation of
“Colfficers and employees of the Department
of Justice and other departments and agen-
cies of the United States engaged in the de-
tection, investigation, or prosecution of crime

. .? 18 U.S.C. §8771(c)(1) (emphasis added).
Congress also permitted crime victims to as-
sert their rights either in the court in which
formal charges had already been filed “or, if
no prosecution is underway, in the district
court in the district in which the crime oc-
curred.” 18 U.S.C. §38771(d)(3) (emphasis
added).

Despite Congress’ clear intention to extend
rights to crime victims throughout the proc-
ess, the Justice Department is reading the
CVRA much more narrowly. In the recent
OLC opinion, for example, the Department
takes the position that ‘“‘the CVRA is best
read as providing that the rights identified
in section 377l(a) are guaranteed from the
time that criminal proceedings are initiated
(by complaint, information, or indictment)
and cease to be available if all charges are
dismissed either voluntarily or on the merits
(or if the Government declines to bring for-
mal charges after the filing of a complaint).”
The Availability of Crime Victims’ Rights
Under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004,
Memorandum from John E. Bies (Dec. 17,
2010, publicly released May 20, 2011) (herein-
after “‘OLC Opinion’’). Indeed, in that same
opinion, I am surprised to see the Depart-
ment citing a snippet from my floor remarks
during the passage of the CVRA for the prop-
osition that crime victims can confer with
prosecutors only after the formal filing of
charges. See id. at 9 (citing 150 Cong. Rec.
$4260, S4268 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen.
Kyl).

I did want to express my surprise that your
prosecutors are so clearly quoting my re-
marks out of context. Here is the full pas-
sage of my remarks, which were part of a
colloquy with my co-sponsor on the CVRA,
Senator Feinstein:

Senator Feinstein: Section .. . (a)(5) pro-
vides a right to confer with the attorney for
the Government in the case. This right is in-
tended to be expansive. For example, the vic-
tim has the right to confer with the Govern-
ment concerning any critical stage or dis-
position of the case. The right, however, is not
limited to these examples. I ask the Senator if
he concurs in this intent.

Senator Kyl: Yes. The intent of this sec-
tion is just as the Senator says. This right to
confer does not give the crime victim any

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE

right to direct the prosecution. Prosecutors
should consider it part of their profession to
be available to consult with crime victims
about concerns the victims may have which
are pertinent to the case, case proceedings or
dispositions. Under this provision, victims are
able to confer with the Government's attorney
about proceedings after charging.

150 Cong. Rec. S4260, S4268 (Apr. 22, 2004)
(statements of Sens. Feinstein & Kyl) (em-
phases added). Read in context, it is obvious
that the main point of my remarks was that
a victim’s right to confer was ‘‘intended to
be expansive.”’ Senator Feinstein and I then
gave various examples of situations in which
victims could confer with prosecutors, with
the note that the right to confer was ‘‘not
limited to these examples.’ It is therefore
troubling to me that in this opinion the Jus-
tice Department is quoting only a limited
portion of my remarks and wrenching them
out of context to suggest that I think that
crime victims do not have any right to con-
fer (or to be treated with fairness) until after
charging.

In giving an example that the victims
would have such rights after charging, I was
not suggesting that they had no such right
earlier in the process. Elsewhere in my re-
marks I made clear that crime victims had
rights under the CVRA even before an indict-
ment is filed. For example, in the passage
quoted above, I made clear that crime vic-
tims had a right to consult about both ‘‘the
case’’ and ‘‘case proceedings’’—i.e., both
about how the case was being handled before
being filed in court and then later how the
case was being handled in court “pro-
ceedings.”’ As another example, Senator
Feinstein and I explained that we had draft-
ed the CVRA to extend a right to victims to
attend only ‘‘public” proceedings, because
otherwise the rights would extend to grand
jury proceedings. See, e.g., 150 Cong. Rec.
54260, S4268 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statements of
Sens. Feinstein & Kyl). Of course, no such
limitation would have been necessary under
the CVRA if CVRA rights attach (as the De-
partment seems to think) only after the fil-
ing of a grand jury indictment.

Courts have already rejected the Justice
Department’s position that the CVRA ap-
plies only after an indictment is filed. For
example, in In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir.
2008), the Department took the position that
crime victims had no right to confer with
prosecutors until after the Department had
reached and signed a plea agreement with a
corporation (BP Products North America)
whose illegal actions had resulted in the
deaths of fifteen workers in an oil refinery
explosion. Of course, this position meant
that the victims could have no role in shap-
ing any plea deal that the Department
reached. In rejecting the Department’s posi-
tion, the Fifth Circuit held that “the govern-
ment should have fashioned a reasonable
way to inform the victims of the likelihood
of criminal charges and to ascertain the vic-
tims’ views on the possible details of a plea
bargain.”’ Id. at 394.

In spite of this binding decision from the
Fifth Circuit, crime victims’ advocates have
reported to me that the Justice Department
is still proceeding in the Fifth Circuit and
elsewhere on the assumption that it has no
obligations to treat victims fairly or to con-
fer with them until after charges are for-
mally filed. Given the Fifth Circuit’s Dean
decision, this position appears to place the
Department in violation of a binding court
ruling that extends rights to thousands of
crime victims in Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Texas. And more generally, the Depart-
ment’s position simply has no grounding in
the clear language of the CVRA.

My first question: What is the Justice De-
partment doing to extend to victims their

June 8, 2011

right to fair treatment and their right to
confer with prosecutors when the Justice De-
partment is negotiating pre-indictment plea
agreements and non-prosecution agreements
with defense attorneys, including negotia-
tions within the Fifth Circuit?
CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHT TO APPELLATE
PROTECTION

Protection of crime victims’ rights in ap-
pellate courts is an important part of the
CVRA. As you know, when Congress passed
the CVRA, the federal courts of appeals had
recognized that crime victims could take or-
dinary appeals to protect their rights. See,
e.g., Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 46 (4th
Cir. 1981) (rape victim allowed to appeal dis-
trict court’s adverse ‘“‘rape shield statute”
ruling); United States v. Kones, 77 F.3d 66 (8rd
Cir. 1996) (victim allowed to appeal adverse
restitution decision). Congress sought to
leave these protections in place, while ex-
panding them to ensure that crime victims
could obtain quick vindication of their
rights in appellate courts by providing—in
§3771(d)(3)—that ‘“‘{i]f the district court de-
nies the relief sought, the [victim] may peti-
tion the court of appeals for a writ of man-
damus.”” 18 U.S.C. §8771(d)(3). Ordinarily,
whether mandamus relief should issue is dis-
cretionary. The plain language of the CVRA,
however, specifically and clearly overruled
such discretionary mandamus standards by
directing that ‘‘[t]he court of appeals shall
take up and decide such application forthwith
.... 18 U.S.C. §3771(d)(3) (emphasis added).
As I explained when the Senate considered
the CVRA:

{[W]hile mandamus is generally discre-

tionary, this provision [18 U.S.C. §3771(d)(3)]
means that courts must review these cases.
Appellate review of denials of victims’ rights
is just as important as the initial assertion
of a victim’s right. This provision ensures re-
view and encourages courts to broadly defend
the victims’ rights.
150 Conc. REc. $4270 (Apr. 22, 2004) (state-
ment of Sen. Kyl) (emphases added). Simi-
larly, the CVRA’s co-sponsor with me, Sen-
ator Feinstein, stated that the Act would
create “‘a new use of a very old procedure,
the writ of mandamus. This provision will
establish a procedure where a crime victim
can, in essence, immediately appeal a denial
of their rights by a trial court to the court
of appeals.”’ 150 Conc. REc. $4262 (statement
of Sen. Feinstein) (emphases added): see also
id. (statement of Sen. Kyl) (crime victims
must ‘“‘be able to have ... the appellate
courts take the appeal and order relief). In
short, the legislative history shows that
§3771(d)(3) was intended to allow crime vic-
tims to take accelerated appeals from dis-
trict court decisions denying their rights and
have their appeals reviewed under ordinary
standards of appellate review.

In spite of that unequivocal legislative his-
tory, the Justice Department has in past
cases asserted a contrary position. In In re
Antrobus, 519 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 2008), Ken
and Sue Antrobus sought to obtain appellate
review of a ruling by a trial court that they
could not deliver a victim impact statement
at the sentencing of the man who sold the
murder weapon used to kill their daughter.
The Tenth Circuit ruled against them on the
basis that the Antrobuses were not entitled
to regular appellate review, but only discre-
tionary mandamus review. See id. at 1124-25.
The Tenth Circuit did not consider the legis-
lative history in reaching this conclusion,
leading the Antrobuses to file petitions for
rehearing and rehearing en banc—petitions
that recounted this legislative history. In re-
sponse, the Justice Department asked the
Tenth Circuit to deny the victims’ petitions.
Remarkably, the Justice Department told
the Tenth Circuit that it could ignore the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012720
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011091.txt,"I see no reason why lending banks should be separate from investment banks.

Rather the depositors’ money should not be risked in either.

It is also a mistake to blame Wall Street chicanery. Chicanery is a fact of life, and
Wall Street has more than its share. But I can testify, from a ringside seat, that many
sound financiers and first-rate economists genuinely believed in the sub-prime
derivatives they were selling. They were proposed to the trusts I run. ] turned them
down as a business proposition because | saw too much complexity and no upside.

But my read was that the presenters were sold themselves.
The problem is not in the people. It is in the inherent fragility of deposit-and-lend
banks. Then what would the world be like without them? The answer first needs a

closer look at the problem.

Credit Risk is More than Leverage

Some leverage is a good thing. Firms issue bonds as well as stocks in order to attract
a wider range of investors. Risk-averse investors may choose the safety of bonds,
whose interest claims are paid first, while risk tolerant ones may be happy with the
iffier but more promising equity remainder. Leverage in general is a way to satisfy

both these constituencies.

Credit risk rises with term (duration) as well as amount of debt. One of the most
telling points in Siegel’s Stocks for the Long Run is that corporate bonds of 15 years
or more have proved more volatile in real total return than equities have. No
wonder. A corporate bond will have ample debt coverage (gross profit/debt service)
at date of issuance, and an appropriate credit rating. What will both be fifteen years

from now?

Homeowners also typically borrow long-term. They expect to have children in local

schools, husbands and/or wives in local jobs, and other roots in the community. But

Chapter 8 Banks, Money and Macroeconomics 2/8/16 2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011091
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019473.txt,"Share or comment on this article

Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019473
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031716.txt,"﻿http://fortune.com/2016/10/22/middle-east-isis-syria/
FORTUNE INSIDERS INTERNATIONAL
What the Middle East Needs
Now from America
Commentary by: Thomas J. Barrack Jr.
OCTOBER 22, 2016, 9:00 AM EDT
DAMASCUS, SYRIA. MARCH 13, 2016. People in a Damascus neighborhood, an area liberated when a
ceasefire agreement between the Syrian Army and the rebels controlling the district came into effect on
February 27, 2016. Valery Sharifulin/TASS (Photo by Valery SharifulinTASS via Getty Images)Valery
Sharifulin — TASS/Getty Images
For decades, the U.S. has pursued misguided policies.
At pivotal moments in our history, America has courageously
concluded that a central tenet of its foreign policy, conceived with the
best intentions, simply isn’t working. Hard though it’s been for this
proud and mighty nation to admit failure, trading a losing strategy for
a fresh course has brought such triumphs as the Nixon-Kissinger pacts
with China that isolated the Soviet Union and helped to end the Cold
War.
Today, America faces just such a reckoning in the Middle East. Our
objective is clear: halting the spread of terrorism that’s headed for our
shores, threatening mass murder in our suburban shopping malls, city
tunnels, and crowded parks. With the Middle East in chaos—as though
a raging desert sirocco is destroying all sense of order––the US should
make a radical, historic shift in its outreach towards the Arab world.
Given the reluctance of America and its Western allies to launch a
military offensive, it’s impossible to know when peace will be restored.
But right now, while the battles rage, the US can take decisive
diplomatic steps to stem the poverty and despair that makes the
Middle East a breeding ground for radical Islamic terrorism. America
should forge alliances with a new generation of Arab leaders whose
principal goal is improving the daily lives of their people. Providing
jobs and raising hope among the region’s impoverished youth is the
best protection for the world’s wealthy nations, from America, to
Europe, to the Arabian Peninsula.
Once peace is restored, the US should take the lead in establishing a
21st century “Marshall Plan” of economic aid to durably lift living
standards in the Middle East’s poorest areas.
So what went wrong? For decades, the U.S. has pursued a misguided
policy I’ll call “embrace and abandon.” It started with the “embrace:”
recruiting and financing leaders who were blatantly autocratic, yet at
the time qualified as America’s allies. Then, the U.S. invariably
exhorted these strongmen to champion revolutionary democratic
reforms in the name of “nation building.” Yet the newly-installed
regimes owed their existence to denying freedoms that would rally
dissidents to overthrow them. So the democratization America
encouraged was doomed from the start.
Then came the “abandon.” Time and time again, when the
governments America had nurtured and praised faced resistance or
rebellion, Washington deserted their leaders, citing the popular excuse
that their repressive measures were enslaving their own people.
Supporting leaders when they kept the Middle East stable, then
dumping them when they failed to adopt Western ideals, was a
blueprint for disaster. And it’s disaster that ensued. Many of those
strongmen––from Mubarak in Egypt to Gaddafi in Libya––have
fallen. Once dominated by repressive but stable nation-states, vast
swaths of the Middle East are now borderless, a hodge-podge of
territories controlled by warring factions that’s a throwback to its
tribal past.
The search for a solution to this chaos requires a clear understanding
of how we got here in the first place.
For centuries, the Ottoman Empire had neutralized the historically
rooted sectarian divisions within Islam. Those divisions stem from its
ancient political legacy as a “caliphate,” a religious state with united by
military might, but with constantly shifting borders. Following the
Ottoman collapse after World War I, European colonial powers
assumed the role of regional administrator, and colluded to redraw
boundaries (i.e. Sykes-Picot) in the Middle-East to create nation states
that satisfied competing Western interests. Those newly-created
nations, occupying territories defined by legal borders, ignored Arab
history and tribal custom. Modern Western notions of distinct nations
bound together by geography, language, self-determination or political
ideals been relevant in the Arab world. To Arabs, tribe and religion
always trump an imposed political structure, especially the Westernexported
concept of the nation-state.
Following World War II, as European colonialism waned, the US
assumed a more significant role in the Middle East. US foreign policy
was driven primarily by oil interests, the protection of Israel and
resistance to Soviet aggression. To prevent the region from dissolving
in sectarian conflict, the US established a series of autocracies. The
campaign included restoring the Shah of Iran to the throne after the
democratically elected Mosaddegh regime nationalized oil fields, and
supporting for the Baathist overthrow of the Qasim government in
Iraq, which gave rise to Saddam Hussein.
Following the end of the Cold War, America’s foreign policy gravitated
toward nation building, and the widespread promotion of democracy
and human rights abroad. However, an iron fisted policies the
strongmen imposed to remain in power conflicted with the moral
endeavor to curate democracy afar. Hence, America’s crusade
undermined its original goals by threatening the same autocratic
regimes the US had helped establish.
As the leaders the West once championed are toppled one by one, the
boot-prints of Western Power are clearly visible. Regimes once
supported by the US have fallen, marking the failure of embrace and
abandon. In Egypt, Mubarak was in, then deserted. In Iraq, Hussein
was in, then deposed. In Libya, Gaddafi was in, then overthrown with
US support. In Syria with Assad, it was the same scenario. The
instability created by contradictory Western interests has invited far
worse atrocities by the new regimes than the crimes perpetrated by the
previous order. The massacres in Syria and Iraq are obvious, bitter
examples.
Filling the void are a multitude of warring sectarian groups from ISIS
to Syrian rebels. The factions each generally fight under their own flag
of political Islam. The rise of Islamic factions battling for territory is a
legacy of the Iranian revolution that established a state rooted in
religion.
Now, nearly four decades old, the Revolutionary Guard’s rise to power
remains the catalyst for Islamic sectarian division today, releasing
forces of fury once confined first by Ottoman rule and then by US
dominance in the region. The threat to Arab nations and the West that
ensued is the same as that led by the Ottomans: the spread of a radical
Islamic caliphate based on religion, not country. In Iran, this is credo
is championed by the Revolutionary Guard and an Ayatollah who
lectures two billion Muslims that he is an infallible ruler directly
responsible to God. US diplomats are faced with an impossible
balancing act: limiting nuclear proliferation and, at the same time,
firmly standing against the religious intolerance fanning Islamic
terrorism.
The outbreak of these historically opposing forces, compounded by
declining oil prices, is heightening the ferment.
The Arab World’s best hope is the rise of a new generation in
government. In the UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, brilliant young
leaders are crafting forward-looking policies to effectively forge a new
Middle East. American foreign policy must persuade these bold
visionaries to lean West rather than East. This endeavor will not
simply benefit the nations they lead. It’s the most effective strategy to
safeguard America’s interests. By supporting their anti-terrorism
platforms abroad, America enhances its anti-terrorism policies at
home.
Like Asian rulers who launched the Tiger Economies of the mid to late
20th century, these new Arab leaders are searching for policies aimed
at economic and educational development. Those policies are designed
to reduce internal tensions and secure their countries’ rightful place in
a future dominated by global trade. The fate of America’s Middle
Eastern allies, as well as its own foreign policy interests, hinges on
these reform efforts. These leaders need and deserve active, engaged
US support. Yet America’s recent retreat from the region, following
clumsy attempts at nation building, has destabilized and discouraged
its allies.
Iran is supporting militias in Iraq, Syria and Yemen whose stated
purpose is to eradicate Israel. That threat may create what has been a
previously unthinkable alliance between our Gulf Cooperating Council
partners and Israel. It’s in the interest of all these allies, including
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Palestine, other GCC members, along with Israel,
to join forces. That alliance would provide a countervailing balance to
the Revolutionary Guard in Iran, the ISIS caliphate and the aggressive
aspiration of Turkey, which is further fueled by a renewed Russian
push.
The competition for a caliphate has more contestants than just Iran,
including ISIS, of course, as well as Turkey, and the Muslim
Brotherhood. As the US withdraws, Russia is taking its place as the
non-Arab power player in the Middle East. The chill in US-Russia
relations has left President Putin free to defy Washington. Without
predictable US-support, our allies may have only one direction to turn
as Russia capitalizes on every USA misstep in the region.
The emerging alliance between Putin and Turkey’s Erdogan has
evolved in perfect Kissingerian fashion; sovereign relationships can be
as ephemeral as their counterparties’ interests. And now that Russia
and Turkey seem to have a growing relationship, a counterbalancing
alignment needs to be crafted between the GCC and the Arab nations.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has been our longest and strongest ally
and, to many Westerners’ amazement, it is impossible for the US to
move against any hostile Islamic group anywhere in the world without
Saudi support. Almost two billion Muslims look to Mecca and Medina
as their spiritual heartland and challenging any faction of Islam
without the support of its guardian, Saudi Arabia, would be foolhardy.
The Saudis are reliable defenders of the West’s diverse interests in the
region, and have been America’s principal ally in the Middle East for
more than seventy years. The confused notion that Saudi Arabia is
synonymous with radical Islam is falsely based on the Western notion
that “one size fits all.” Fundamentalists supporting the Islamic State in
the Kingdom violate the rule of law at home, and the Saudis’ strong
efforts to prevent the export of terrorism. Saudi senior leaders desire
good relations with the West and see the Islamic State and Jihadist
terrorism as threatening to their very rule. Through the safeguarding
of the Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina, which remain open to tens of
millions of foreign visitors and differing Islamic beliefs, the Kingdom
has a unique window into the actions and motivations of radical
fundamentalists who pass in and out of those always accessible cities.
By sharing that intelligence, the Saudis greatly enhance America’s
security.
Like it or not, the military option most unpopular with America’s
voters and politicians may be its best. Bashar Assad may well be our
only hope in fighting the various terrorist factions that are attempting
to form an ISIS state. If America agrees that putting boots on the
ground would be impractical and ineffective, then a self-governed
“Syria State” must be the entity that reaches settlements with the
various factions that are causing the mass migration of thousands of
Syrians to Europe, the USA and elsewhere. The only solution is one
that works with Russia and not against them. Our vacuum forced that
hand, because we are no longer the lonesome superpower shaping
Middle East foreign policy.
When the USA had a narrow set of interests during the Cold War era,
acting prudently in favor of well-defined and communicated
objectives, its actions were more effective. But as the objectives
changed, and America attempted to democratize autocracies, the
broadening of goals led to a corresponding weakening of results. A
clear direction in the Middle East is imperative, not just to enhance
Middle Eastern nation-state interests, but to protect US interests at
home, as well as abroad.
America’s nation-building exercise of the past twenty years was
founded on self-contradictions that have tarnished US foreign
credibility. The geopolitical framework for that policy has been
“embrace and abandon,” a formula that has caused frustration,
confusion and concern to America’s allies in the region and displaced
many millions of young refugees.
As America rethinks its interests in the Middle East, its primary
concern is the elimination of domestic terrorism. The path forward
replaces fear with hope and poverty with prosperity. Once security in
the Middle East is attained, including a negotiated peace between the
Israelis and the Palestinians, the USA must respond with an “endstate”
perspective to draw a comprehensive solution similar to the
Marshall Plan. Going from promoting then dumping dictators to
drawing a new manifesto for economic rebirth would mean that
finally, the America is finally doing right in teeming, oil-rich desert
lands where it did wrong for decades.
Thomas J. Barrack Jr. is an international private equity investor and
the founder and executive chairman of Colony Capital. He is also
foreign policy and economic advisor to GOP U.S. Presidential
candidate Donald Trump. The views expressed in this article are his
own and do not reflect the campaign.
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014351.txt,"Chart 56: What would get you more interested in investing in IVZ stock?

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Consistent above Amore favorable Lessregulationfor | More operating Longer term FX
average organic —s market backdrop the industry leverage hedges
growth

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research

« |VZ is confident it can achieve its 3-5% organic growth rate driven by three main
pillars. The first being the ongoing search for yield driving fixed income
flows/allocation which IVZ has benefitted from and should continue to benefit given
their strong performance, distribution, and product set. The second being ongoing
“barbelling” by clients which drives flows into passive and alternatives, two
products IVZ has leadership in. Lastly, |VZ sees opportunity in its institutional
channel, particularly in Asia which has had notable momentum.

e — Given the run up in rates, IVZ touched upon its fixed income exposure and what
might be at risk of underperformance/outflows. IVZ mentioned roughly $100B of its
AUM or ~13% was in fixed income that didn’t include short duration or floating
rate, a number they feel is relatively small compared to some of its peers.
Additionally, within that $100B a major portion had been underperforming because
of strategic shorter duration, which in a rising rate environment should lead to
outperformance and potentially negate some of the flow headwind.

« Regarding potential changes from the election, while very early, management thinks
that whatever happens to the DOL Fiduciary Rule (delay, modify, etc.), the industry
has already been shifting in a fiduciary direction, and they expect that to continue,
though the pace could vary depending on the eventual outcome. Additionally, IVZ is
relatively well positioned given its diversification among ETF/passive and active
Strategies, as well as similar regulations in Europe that it has managed through. In
terms of a lower corporate tax rate, that would not have much impact to IVZ given
its Bermuda domicile.

eaiey Vance (EV), B-3-7, Underperform
Presenting from EV was Thomas Faust, CEO, Laurie Hylton, CFO, and Dan Cataldo,
Head of IR and Treasurer. Management reported relatively positive F4Q flows,
expects organic growth to hold up well given its mix and performance, and does not
expect a significant change in the DOL impact from the election, but would expect
a significant benefit from a lower US corporate tax rate.

e | When asked what would get you more interested in EV’s stock, the majority of
investors were fairly split between better high fee flows and ETMFs taking off
(38%/31% respectively). Investors also thought increased capital return was

Bankof America

Merrill Lynch 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 37

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014351
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025763.txt,"﻿Economic Research:
How Increasing Income Inequality Is
Dampening U.S. Economic Growth,
And Possible Ways To Change The
Tide
Credit Market Services:
Beth Ann Bovino, U.S. Chief Economist, New York (1) 212-438-1652;
bethann.bovino@standardandpoors.com
Secondary Contact:
Gabriel J Petek, CFA, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5042; gabriel.petek@standardandpoors.com
Research Contributor:
John B Chambers, CFA, New York (1) 212-438-7344; john.chambers@standardandpoors.com
Table Of Contents
Is Income Inequality Increasing?
When Ends Don't Meet
Not Just The Fruits Of Our Labor
The Impact Of Government Policy
Undereducated Workers: Both Today's And Tomorrow's
Catching Up With The Joneses
Secular Stagnation
Not Just A Problem For The Poor
Striking A Palatable Balance
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 1
1351366 | 302136118
Table Of Contents (cont.)
Glossary Of Relevant Terms
Endnotes
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 2
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research:
How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening
U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways To
Change The Tide
The topic of income inequality and its effects has been the subject of countless analysis stretching back generations
and crossing geopolitical boundaries. Despite the tendency to speak about this issue in moral terms, the central
questions are economic ones: Would the U.S. economy be better off with a narrower income gap? And, if an unequal
distribution of income hinders growth, which solutions could do more harm than good, and which could make the
economic pie bigger for all?
Given the decades--indeed, centuries--of debate on this subject, it comes as no surprise that the answers are complex.
A degree of inequality is to be expected in any market economy. It can keep the economy functioning effectively,
incentivizing investment and expansion--but too much inequality can undermine growth.
Higher levels of income inequality increase political pressures, discouraging trade, investment, and hiring. Keynes first
showed that income inequality can lead affluent households (Americans included) to increase savings and decrease
consumption (1), while those with less means increase consumer borrowing to sustain consumption…until those
options run out. When these imbalances can no longer be sustained, we see a boom/bust cycle such as the one that
culminated in the Great Recession (2).
Aside from the extreme economic swings, such income imbalances tend to dampen social mobility and produce a
less-educated workforce that can't compete in a changing global economy. This diminishes future income prospects
and potential long-term growth, becoming entrenched as political repercussions extend the problems.
Alternatively, if we added another year of education to the American workforce from 2014 to 2019, in line with
education levels increasing at the rate of educational achievement seen from 1960 to 1965, U.S. potential GDP would
likely be $525 billion, or 2.4% higher in five years, than in the baseline. If education levels were increasing at the rate
they were 15 years ago, the level of potential GDP would be 1%, or $185 billion higher in five years.
Our review of the data, as well as a wealth of research on this matter, leads us to conclude that the current level of
income inequality in the U.S. is dampening GDP growth, at a time when the world's biggest economy is struggling to
recover from the Great Recession and the government is in need of funds to support an aging population.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 3
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Overview
• At extreme levels, income inequality can harm sustained economic growth over long periods. The U.S. is
approaching that threshold.
• Standard & Poor's sees extreme income inequality as a drag on long-run economic growth. We've reduced our
10-year U.S. growth forecast to a 2.5% rate. We expected 2.8% five years ago.
• With wages of a college graduate double that of a high school graduate, increasing educational attainment is
an effective way to bring income inequality back to healthy levels.
• It also helps the U.S economy. Over the next five years, if the American workforce completed just one more
year of school, the resulting productivity gains could add about $525 billion, or 2.4%, to the level of GDP,
relative to the baseline.
• A cautious approach to reducing inequality would benefit the economy, but extreme policy measures could
backfire.
We see a narrowing of the current income gap as beneficial to the economy. In addition to strengthening the quality of
economic expansions, bringing levels of income inequality under control would improve U.S. economic resilience in
the face of potential risks to growth. From a consumer perspective, benefits would extend across income levels,
boosting purchasing power among those in the middle and lower levels of the pay scale--while the richest Americans
would enjoy increased spending power in a sustained economic expansion. Policymakers should take care, however,
to avoid policies and practices that are either too heavy handed or foster an unchecked widening of the wealth gap.
Extreme approaches on either side would stunt GDP growth and lead to shorter, more fragile expansionary periods.
Is Income Inequality Increasing?
Several institutions, including the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the
Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), have published studies showing that
income inequality has been increasing for the past several decades (3). According to a 2011 review by the OECD, the
average income of the richest 10% of the population is nine times that of the poorest 10%--in other words, a ratio of
9-to-1. The U.S. ratio is much higher, at 14-to-1 (4). The U.S. Gini coefficient, after taxes, has increased by more than
20% from 1979--to 0.434 in 2010 (see chart 1).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 4
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Chart 1
Although a 2011 CBO report demonstrated that real net average U.S. household income grew 62% from 1979-2007,
household income growth was much more rapid at the higher end of the income scale than at the middle and lower
end. Revisiting the issue in 2013, the CBO showed that after-tax average income soared 15.1% for the top 1% from
2009 to 2010--but grew by less than 1% for the bottom 90% over the same time period, and fell for many income
groups (5). Additionally, although the Census Bureau estimates that real mean household income increased 0.2% in
2011 and 2012, it declined for all groups other than those in the top fifth of earners (6).
This concentration of household income follows a long period in which income concentration remained relatively flat.
Using U.S. tax returns, economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez found that income concentration dropped
dramatically following both World Wars and was roughly unchanged for the next few decades (7). It started climbing
again in 1975, reaching pre-World War I levels by 2000--and Saez later observed that U.S. income inequality has now
reached levels not seen since 1928 (8). In both cases, a similar pattern was in evidence--a boom in the financial sector,
over-leveraged lower-income households, a massive, systemic financial crash--and the two worst economic slumps in
U.S. history, the Great Depression and Great Recession, followed.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 5
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
When Ends Don't Meet
A few factors help explain the concentration within so-called ""market income,"" which consists of labor income (wages
and salaries, plus employer-paid benefits), capital income (excluding capital gains), business income, capital gains, and
other income--all before government taxes and transfers (see Glossary for full definition).
The first reason is relatively simple: All these sources of income are less evenly distributed now than a few decades
ago. In 1979, the bottom four-fifths of the income spectrum earned nearly 60% of total labor income, about 33% of
income from capital and business, and about 8% from capital gains. By 2007, the bottom four-fifths share of labor
income had dropped to less than 50%, income from capital and business had decreased to 20%, and capital gains fell
to about 5%. In other words, all sources of income were less evenly distributed in 2007 than in 1979 (9).
Some point to the ""superstar status"" effect, with professional athletes and movie actors enjoying astronomical
increases in earnings in the past few decades, helped by technological innovation that broadened their reach across
global markets and a ""winner take all"" phenomenon.
Another ""superstar"" is the ""super managers."" Piketty argues that the ""primary reason for increased income inequality in
recent decades is the rise of the super managers in both the financial and nonfinancial sectors,"" finding that about 70%
of the increase in income going to the top 0.1% from 1979 to 2005 came from increasing pay for those professionals
(10). Other studies show that, since the 1990s, deregulation, corporate governance, and a greater reliance on equity
options in executive compensation contributed to the compensation gap (11).
Another explanation of market income concentration is technological innovation. This phenomenon boosted the value
of high-skill workers, enhancing their productivity and growth, while rendering some low-skill workers superfluous. As
automation and production efficiencies have reduced the need for labor in mid-level professional or service jobs,
wages have fallen, and occupations requiring a college degree typically offer double the salary of those requiring a high
school diploma or less.
Other arguments suggest international trade and increased immigration--as well as the decrease in unionization--may
also dampen wages of domestic workers. However, research on the trade effect has been inconclusive, while the
impact from increased immigration on domestic wages has been modest (see ""Adding Skilled Labor To America's
Melting Pot Would Heat Up U.S. Economic Growth,"" published March 19, 2014, on RatingsDirect) (12). Meanwhile,
some research has shown that the sharp decline in the unionization in the country, especially in the 1980s, has had a
small but measurable impact on the overall increase in inequality for men over the last few decades (13).
The juxtaposition of slow or stagnant federal minimum wage growth and soaring compensation at the higher end of
the labor income scale is another factor to consider. The minimum wage, which has held at $7.25 an hour since July
2009, has suffered a decline in purchasing power for almost half a century--peaking in 1968, when it was at $1.60, or
just shy of $11 in today's money.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 6
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Not Just The Fruits Of Our Labor
Though the share of income from labor and capital, excluding capital gains, has decreased, the share coming from
capital gains and business income has increased over time. In particular, inherited wealth has increased since the
World Wars and the Great Depression, as Thomas Piketty has shown (14), and with it the earnings from that wealth.
This trend is important because labor income tends to be distributed across income levels more evenly than capital
gains--so a shift in income composition can significantly affect inequality.
While labor income accounted for nearly three-fourths of market income from 1979-2007, that figure had dropped to
two-thirds by 2007. Capital income (excluding capital gains) is the next largest source, but even at its 1981 peak, it
represented only 14% of market income before falling to about 10% of total income in 2007. Conversely, income from
capital gains rose, doubling to approximately 8% of market income in 2007 from about 4% in 1979. Business income
and income from other sources (primarily private pensions) each accounted for about 7% of total income in 2007, up
from about 4% each.
In addition, capital income has become increasingly concentrated since the early 1990s--and, despite declines in 2001
and 2002, concentration spiked from 2003 through 2007, with more than 80% of the capital gains realized by the top
5% of earners going to the top 1% alone (15). Capital gains also have become increasingly concentrated and are tied
with business income as the most concentrated income source.
The Impact Of Government Policy
Government policies on taxation and government transfers, such as Social Security and Medicare, have done little to
reduce income inequality--and may have contributed to a further widening of the gap.
Because government transfers and federal taxes are progressive, the distribution of net household income (after
transfers and federal taxes) is more evenly balanced than the distribution of market income. That said, at the federal
level, the equalizing effect of transfers and taxes on household income was smaller in 2007 than it had been in 1979.
The CBO estimates that the dispersion of market income grew by about one-quarter from 1979-2007, but the
dispersion of after-tax income grew by about one-third (16). The distribution of after-tax income in 2010 became
slightly more even among different groups than before-tax income, though the dispersion of after-tax income in 2010
remained wider than in 1979 (see chart 2) (17).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 7
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Chart 2
While the size of transfer payments rose by a small amount from 1979-2010, the distribution of transfers shifted away
from households in the lower part of the income scale. The bottom 20% of households received only 36% of transfer
payments in 2010, after receiving 54% in 1979 (18). This was largely because of the growth in spending on programs
for the elderly (such as Social Security and Medicare), and benefits of these programs aren't limited to low-income
households. Benefits for other programs that largely benefit the poor were also reduced (19). In addition, tax
expenditures mostly benefit the affluent: Tax credits and tax deductions benefit those more at higher tax rates.
Changes in federal government tax policy have also exacerbated income inequality in recent decades (20). According
to the CBO, the average rate for each income group in 2012 was below the rate that prevailed for that group in the
1990s and most of the 2000s even with the increases in average federal tax rates in 2010 (21). Indeed, the federal
income tax rate for the top income earners fell to 35% in 2012 from 70% in 1979, while the government didn't reduce
the payroll tax rate until the temporary Payroll Tax Holiday of 2010 (22). Keep in mind that the payroll tax that funds
Social Security is levied on pay below a certain threshold ($117,000 this year). In practice, this means that those
earning less than the cap pay a higher rate of Social Security tax than those who earn more than the cap. So, the
composition of federal revenues has shifted away from progressive income taxes to less-progressive payroll taxes, and
income taxes have become slightly more concentrated at the higher end of the income scale.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 8
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Increasing income inequality also poses a risk to certain states' finances, given the correlation between income
inequality and revenue volatility in the slow growth after the Great Recession. According to Gabriel Petek, credit
analyst at Standard & Poor's, the volatility of tax revenue seems to be increasing despite the states' less-progressive tax
structures--suggesting that income inequality as a macroeconomic issue can translate to credit implications for states.
Undereducated Workers: Both Today's And Tomorrow's
Technological achievement has saved us time and reconfigured our daily routines, allowing us to focus on our own
skills and boosting productivity and growth. These advances are naturally disruptive in the beginning as workers
adjust; that disruption becomes alarming when people don't have the means to adapt, making a lasting impact on
career development.
Although the U.S. has been fairly quick to adapt in the past, today's workers have been left behind by technological
change. Indeed, while recent advances now require many workers to have graduated from college, the supply of
college-educated workers hasn't kept up with demand--and even the fraction of high school graduates has stopped
climbing.
This education gap is a main reason for the growing income divide, and it affects both wages and net worth. From a
wage perspective, occupations that typically require postsecondary education generally paid much higher median
wages ($57,770 in 2012)--more than double those occupations that typically require a high school diploma or less
($27,670 in 2012). Further, those with a bachelor's degree had a median net worth value nearly twice that of people
with a high-school diploma in 1998--climbing to almost 3.5 times greater by 2010 (see chart 3) (23). This difference is
even greater higher up the educational ladder.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 9
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Chart 3
Harvard professors Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz argue that, rather than technology picking up speed, the
reduced supply of educated workers is the key factor explaining the education gap, finding that between 1980 and
2005 the pace of the increase in educational attainment slowed dramatically. In 1980, Americans age 30 years or older
had 4.7 years more schooling on average than Americans in 1930--but Americans in 2005 had only 0.8 years more
schooling on average than Americans in 1980 (24). Based on this data, it would appear the problem isn't that
technology has leaped ahead--rather, the supply of educated workers has stalled.
The impact of income inequality on future generations of qualified workers is particularly disconcerting. Michael
Greenstone, Adam Looney, Jeremy Patashnik, and Muxin Yu (Hamilton Project-Brookings) examined the effect that
the income divide in the U.S. could have on the future upward mobility of the country's children (25). They found that
investments in education and skills, traits that increasingly decide job market success, are becoming more stratified by
family income, threatening the earning potential of the youngest Americans.
These researchers note that, although cognitive tests of ability show little difference between children of high- and
low-income parents in the first years of their lives, ""large and persistent"" differences start to appear before kindergarten
and widen throughout high school (26). Indeed, researchers have found that the gap in test results of children from
families at the 90th income percentile versus children of families at the 10th percentile has grown by about 40% over
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 10
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
the past 30 years (27).
Not surprisingly, these differences persist into college and beyond. While there is a 45% chance that a child born into a
poor family will remain there as an adult, chances of staying poor drops to 16% if that child finishes college (see chart
4). A child born into the bottom 20% will only have a 5% chance of reaching the top 20% of income earners as adults.
But that increases to 19% if they earn a college degree.
Chart 4
However, college graduation rates have stagnated for low-income students, in sharp contrast with strong gains for
wealthy students. While college graduation rates increased by about 4 percentage points between those born in the
early 1960s and those born in the early 1980s for the poorest households, the graduation rate for the wealthiest
households increased by almost 20 percentage points over the same period (28). These trends likely feed into the
income potential for kids as they grew older, with children of well-off families much more likely to stay well-off and the
children of poor families disproportionately likely to remain poor.
Given that education--particularly a college degree--is so important in a jobs market that increasingly demands a more
educated workforce, these trends are disturbing. The findings suggest that last generation's inequalities will extend into
the next generation, with diminished opportunities for upward social mobility. Moreover, the U.S. is losing the
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 11
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
potential addition to growth of a worker who has reached his or her full potential.
The pace of U.S. education is also falling behind its peers (see chart 5). Approximately 43% of Americans aged 25-34
had a college degree in 2011, compared with more than half of people the same age in Canada, Japan, and Korea.
Moreover, the proportion of degree holders among Americans aged 25-34 is virtually the same as that among those
55-64, meaning that graduation rates haven't changed much--a sharp contrast with the OECD average and a number of
other countries, where graduation rates have increased significantly. As today's U.S. educational attainment slips
behind other countries, the U.S.' ability to remain economically competitive in the international market is threatened.
Chart 5
What if, instead, we broke that cycle? What if the supply of educated workers picked up its pace, and, more or less,
kept up with technological changes? The U.S. has been no stranger to this in the past. In the early part of this century,
technological advancements were accompanied by an education boom (29). What would be the impact to the
economy and to people's pocketbooks if the U.S. workforce's pace of education were to reach rates of education seen
50 years ago? That was when the American workforce gained a year of education from 1960 to 1965, which is a bit
stronger than the period from 1950 to 1980, where they gained an average of about eight months of education every
five years (30). In this scenario, the U.S. would add another year of education to the American workforce. U.S.
potential GDP would likely be $525 billion, or 2.4% higher in five years than in the baseline (see chart 6). If education
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 12
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
levels were increasing at the rate they were 15 years ago, the level of potential GDP would be 1%, or $185 billion
higher in five years. A more educated workforce would benefit from higher wages. While the increased supply of
people with advanced degrees may initially slow wage gains for jobs requiring an advanced degree, a stronger
economy would help support higher incomes for all and help government budgets.
Chart 6
Historically, data at the state level support these results. States with a well-educated workforce are high-wage states. A
clear and strong correlation exists between the educational attainment of a state's workforce and median wages in the
state, with more educated individuals more likely to participate in the job market and earn more, and less likely to be
unemployed (31). The unemployment rate for people 25 years old and older with a college degree was 3.3% in June
2014, which is one-third of the unemployment rate of those with less than a high school degree.
Education is an investment in the health and livelihood of future generations, with greater parent education positively
correlated to a child's health, cognitive abilities, academic achievement, and future economic opportunities. Education
not only benefits workers today, but also children tomorrow.
With evidence indicating that a well-educated U.S. workforce is not just good for today's workers and their children but
also for the economy's potential long-term growth rate and government balance sheets, what do we need to do to get
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 13
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
there? This will likely require some investment in the human capital of the U.S. workforce, today and tomorrow. But
studies have indicated that the benefits greatly outweigh the costs. Researchers estimate that, depending on the exact
program, $1,000 in college aid results in a 3- to 6-percentage-point increase in college enrollment, with the total cost in
aid averaging $20,000 to $30,000 to send one student to college (32). Given a college graduate is expected to earn
about $30,000 more per year than a high school graduate over the course of their life, the benefits outweigh the costs.
It also this means more tax revenue from higher income than otherwise would have been the case.
Other new low-cost interventions, like simpler financial aid applications, more outreach about financial aid options that
are available to students from low-income households, as well as offering college mentors to students, could help send
more kids to school and encourage them to stay once they get there (33). Indeed, while the sticker price of a college
degree is high, according to the College Board in 2012, the actual price paid after financial aid is often lower. That may
be enough to encourage more low-income families to enroll.
While most agree that increasing college graduation rates would be a boon for economic growth, what about
education before college? Goldin and Katz argue that the U.S. had ""pioneered"" free and accessible elementary
education for most of its citizens and extended its lead into high school education when other countries were
introducing mass elementary school education (34). After World War II, U.S. universities were known to be the best in
the world. But by the early 1970s, Golden and Katz note that high school graduation rates plateaued and have been
relatively flat for more than three decades, and college graduation rates slid backwards. That educational slowdown is
likely the most important reason for increased education wage differentials since 1980 and is a major contributor to
income inequality today.
Even if the U.S. government offers financial aid for college, many high school graduates aren't prepared for the rigors
of university education. The 2003 Program for International Assessment (PISA), for one, showed U.S. 15-year-olds to
be substantially below the OECD average in mathematics literacy, problem solving, and scientific literacy (35).
Increasing aptitude in early education has been discussed in a number of studies. Most point to increasing the quality
of K-12 education to improve high school graduation rates and postsecondary education (36). Some have argued that
inadequate investments by states and local governments in education have weakened the ability of a state to develop,
grow, and attract businesses that offer high-skilled, high-wage jobs (37). The Brookings Institution has found that a
high-quality universal preschool program, costing about $59 billion, could add $2 trillion in annual U.S. GDP by 2080.
This additional growth would generate enough federal revenue to easily cover its costs several times over (38).
However, the authors note that it is difficult to win support for a short-term investment, like preschool programs, given
the long-term nature of its benefits to the economy.
Catching Up With The Joneses
As income inequality increased before the crisis, less affluent households took on more and more debt to keep up--or,
in this case, catch up--with the Joneses, first by purchasing a new home. Further, when home prices climbed, these
households were willing to borrow against their newfound equity--and financial institutions were increasingly willing to
help them do so, despite slow income growth. A number of economists have pointed to ways in which this trend may
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 14
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
have harmed the U.S. economy.
Professor of Public Policy at U.S. Berkeley Robert Reich argues that increased inequality has reduced overall aggregate
demand. He observes that high-income households have a lower marginal propensity to consume (MPC) out of
income than other households, and they're currently holding a bigger slice of the economic pie. Research by
economists Atif Mian, Kamalesh Rao, and Amir Sufi backed that up, finding the MPC for households with an average
annual income of less than $35,000 to be three times larger than the MPC for households with average income over
$200,000 (39). Mian and Sufi also found that, as home values increased between 2002 and 2006, low-income
households very aggressively borrowed and spent (possibly borrowing on increased home equity)--while high-income
households were less responsive. Unsurprisingly, when housing wealth declined, the cutback on spending for
low-income households was twice as large as that for rich households (40).
Mian and Sufi further used ZIP codes to locate areas with disproportionately large numbers of subprime borrowers
(those with low incomes and credit ratings) and found that these ZIP codes experienced growth in borrowing between
2002 and 2005 that was more than twice as high as in ZIP codes with wealthy ""prime"" borrowers (41). They also found
that ZIP codes with lower income growth received more mortgage loans during that time period, supporting the notion
that government policy targeting low-income groups increased lending to the less well-off. After 2006, the subprime
ZIP codes experienced an increase in default rates three times that of prime ZIP codes.
Raghuram Rajan claims that, while high-income individuals saved, low-income individuals borrowed beyond their
means in order to sustain their consumption, and that this overleveraging, as a result of increased inequality, was a
significant cause of the financial crisis in 2008 (42). An IMF paper by Michael Kumhof and Romain Ranciere also
details the mechanisms that may have linked income distribution and financial excess and have suggested that these
same factors were likely at play in both the Great Depression and Great Recession (43).
Unfortunately, coming back from the Great Recession appears to be taking longer than many had hoped. With a
postrecession annual growth rate of 2.2%, our recovery is not even half the historical average annual growth of 4.6%
for other recoveries going back to 1959. This is not a complete surprise, given that financial crises are often followed
by prolonged recessions and a long bout of subpar growth--thanks in part to the deleveraging that comes as people try
to repair their finances.
Indeed, during the recession, the consumption-to-income ratio of the bottom 95% of earners fell sharply, as banks and
other lenders imposed tighter borrowing constraints, according to a study by Barry Z. Cynamon and Stephen M.
Fazzari (44). Though the consumption-to-income ratio of the top 5% rose, this increase was not enough to offset
inadequate demand coming from the bottom 95%. That makes sense. Between 2007 and 2010, the average U.S.
household lost 39.6%, or about 18 years' worth, of their net wealth in the three years when the recession started in
2007 to the early recovery in 2010. The middle class lost over 40% of their wealth in just three years, while the top
10% of income earners actually accumulated an additional 2% to their wealth (see chart 7). Corporations that have
been reluctant to invest or to cut prices to gain market share because of distorted incentives to seek short-term stock
market gains have also depressed demand, according to Andrew Smithers (45). These two factors go a long way to
explain why the recent recovery has been subpar in comparison with other postrecessionary periods.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 15
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Chart 7
Indeed, economist Robert E. Hall, a senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, laments that ""the years
since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of an unprecedented magnitude since the Great
Depression,"" noting that U.S. economic output in 2013 was 13% below what the precrisis trend has predicted (46). He
is skeptical that a sudden surge in output will help the economy recover the ground it lost. Rather, a possible scenario
would be a gradual return to a precrisis growth rate, which leaves the U.S. permanently below the level of output that
precrisis trends had suggested.
Indeed, while Standard & Poor's is expecting the annual real growth rate to climb above the 3% mark in 2015. That
will be the first time since 2005 and comes after another year of subpar growth of just 2.0% expected for 2014. The
U.S. already has averaged a mere 1.4% over the last 10 years, through 2013. After expecting to see that long-awaited
burst of growth in 2014 of 3% at the beginning of the year, we have reduced our expectations for GDP growth back to
that 2% mark once again. We now expect the 10-year average annual growth to be about 2.5% though 2024. To put
that in perspective, five years ago, we forecasted the 10-year average annual growth rate to be 2.8%, with all yearly
rates much higher than the 2% mark.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 16
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Secular Stagnation
The Fed's expectation for long-run U.S. economic growth has drifted down even more than our forecasts. Five years
ago, the Fed expected to see the economy ambling along at a respectable 2.65% annual pace over the long run. By
June, the Fed's expectation for long-run growth in the U.S. had dropped to 2.2% (central tendency was 2.1% to 2.3%).
The IMF and CBO have also lowered their long-term growth projections. Last month, the IMF lowered its long-run
growth forecast for the U.S. to about 2% (47). The CBO now projects that real (inflation-adjusted) GDP will increase at
an average annual rate of 2.3% over the next 25 years, compared with 3.1% during 1970–2007.
Aside from the fact that there are different Federal Open Market Committee participants now than before, the Fed's
reasons for lowering its expectations for long-term growth are likely similar to concerns that the IMF and CBO raised,
including the effects of an aging population on the economy and more modest prospects for productivity growth. The
CBO also noted that in addition to the retirement of the baby-boom generation, the declining birth rates and leveling
off of increases in women's participation in the work force also helped slow the growth of the labor force.
In this light, former Secretary of the Treasury Lawrence Summers has said that the U.S. may be mired in a period of
slow growth, marked by only marginal increases in the size of the workforce and small gains in productivity--what he
called ""secular stagnation"" (48). This refers to an economic era of persistently insufficient economic demand relative to
the aggregate saving of households and corporations. Here, the U.S. may be stuck in a long-run equilibrium where real
interest rates need to be negative to generate adequate demand. Without that, the U.S. slides into economic
stagnation. While specific causes of secular stagnation are still uncertain, possible reasons include slower population
growth, an aging population, globalization, and technological changes. An increasingly unequal distribution of income
and wealth is also cited as a contributing factor. Disparate income growth is important because those at the top of the
distribution have a higher savings rate. Since income that is put into savings is not spent, it undercuts the overall level
of economic activity that takes place. Mian and Sufi emphasize the role of income inequality and how recent years
seem to suggest the only way the economy is capable of generating faster economic growth is by being juiced with
more aggressive credit expansion, which does not last (49).
Unfortunately, the move toward low-paying jobs has continued unabated. In the past four years since the outset of the
U.S. economic recovery, job gains have come mainly in low-paying positions, according to the National Employment
Law Project, an advocacy group for low-income workers. While 22% of job losses during the recession were in
lower-wage industries, 44% of employment growth in the past four years has come in this group--meaning that, today,
lower-wage industries employ 1.85 million more Americans than before the downturn. And often these low-wage jobs
have less access to benefits, such as private health insurance, pensions, and paid leave, compared with their
higher-paying brethren (50). Considering the Bureau of Labor Statistics' forecasts that low-paying jobs will dominate
employment gains for the next decade, it seems clear that labor-income disparity will continue to widen.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 17
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Not Just A Problem For The Poor
Do societies inevitably face a choice between efficient production and the equitable distribution of income? According
to IMF economists Andrew Berg, Jonathan Ostry, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer, the answer is no. They argue that the
empirical literature on growth and inequality using long-run average growth may have missed how income distribution
is tied to abrupt ends in growth.
Their work examined growth over a long time horizon, between 1950 and 2006, focusing on the duration of growth
spells, and showed that there may be no trade-off between efficiency and equality (51). In fact, they posited that
equality could be an important component of sustained growth, observing that the level of inequality may be the key
difference between countries that enjoy extended, rapid expansion and those whose growth spurts quickly dissipate. In
short, promoting greater equality may also improve efficiency in the form of more sustainable long-run growth.
Of the number of variables associated with longer growth spells, income inequality's relationship with the duration of
growth spells was the strongest (see chart 8). They found that a 10% decrease in inequality (a change in the Gini
coefficient to 0.37 from 0.40) increases the expected length of a growth spell by 50%.
Chart 8
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 18
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Meanwhile, the experiences of developing and emerging economies suggest that igniting growth is less difficult than
sustaining it (52). Even the poorest of countries have managed to expand their economies for several years--only for
growth to falter.
Berg and Ostry found that income inequality is the single most important factor in determining which countries can
sustain economic growth. Using the GINI coefficient--which ranges from 0 to 1.0--they measured the extent to which
economic growth falls as inequality rises. A country in which everyone earns exactly the same would have a score of 0,
while a society in which one person owned everything would have a score of 1.0. Berg and Ostry saw that a GINI
coefficient of higher than 0.45 could weigh on growth. Although correlation is not causation, we note that, based on
after-tax income, the U.S. economy scored 0.434 on the GINI scale in 2010, according to the CBO, placing it near that
threshold (53).
To be sure, it seems counterintuitive that inequality is associated with less-sustainable growth, since some inequality,
by providing incentives to effort and entrepreneurship, may be essential to a functioning market economy. But beyond
the risk that inequality may heighten the susceptibility of an economy to booms and busts, it may also spur political
instability--thus discouraging investment. Inequality may make it harder for governments to enact policies to
prevent--or soften--shocks, such as raising taxes or cutting public spending to avoid a debt crisis. The affluent may
exercise disproportionate influence on the political process, or the needs of the less affluent may grow so severe as to
make additional cuts to fiscal stabilizers that operate automatically in a downturn politically unviable.
Striking A Palatable Balance
The discussion about income inequality is hardly new, and contrary opinions abound. In his influential 1975 book
""Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff,"" economist Arthur Okun argued that pursuing equality can reduce
efficiency. He claimed that not only would more equal income distribution reduce work and investment incentives, but
the efforts to redistribute wealth--through, for example, taxes and minimum wages--can themselves be costly (54).
Of course, income inequality in the U.S. was much less 40 years ago. Kristin Forbes found that, in the short- and
medium-terms over a few years, an increase in income inequality has a significant positive relationship with economic
expansion (55). But Forbes also found that the relationship was weakened (or could turn negative) when she increased
the length of the growth spells. And a World Bank study later found that the positive effect on growth was almost
exclusively reserved for the top end of the income distribution (56).
Income inequality can contribute to economic growth, and a degree of inequality is a necessary part of what keeps any
market economic engine operating on all cylinders. Indeed, a degree of inequality is to be expected in any market
economy, given differences in ""initial endowments"" (of wealth and ability), the differential market returns to
investments in human capital and entrepreneurial activities, and the effect of luck.
However, too much of the focus in the debate about inequality has been on the top earners, rather than on how to lift a
significant portion of the population out of poverty--which would be a good thing for the economy. And though
extreme inequality can impair economic growth, badly designed and implemented efforts to reverse this trend could
also undermine growth, hurting the very people such policies are meant to help (57).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 19
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
There is no shortage of proposals for tackling extreme income inequality. President Obama has proposed an increase
in the hourly minimum wage to $10.10 from the current rate of $7.25, and the IMF recently called on lawmakers to
boost the wage (though it refrained from suggesting a specific level). Managing Director Christine Lagarde said that
doing so would help raise the incomes of millions of poor and working-class Americans and ""would be helpful from a
macroeconomic point of view"" (58).
An increase in the minimum wage would certainly carry with it short-term impacts, likely bringing 900,000 people
above the poverty line in the second half of 2016--and, according to the CBO, lifting wages for 24 million workers at
the next level above minimum wage. Fewer American households at or below the poverty line would also help bolster
government balance sheets and likely improve state and local credit conditions.
But raising the minimum wage is not without negative consequences. Reduced labor demands resulting from higher
wages could reduce potential hires by 500,000 jobs, according to CBO estimates (59). Further, while 49% of those
workers making the minimum wage are under age 25, the CATO Institute reports that, of older workers (the other half
of minimum wage earners), 29.2% live in poverty and 46.2% live near the poverty level, with family incomes less than
1.5 times the poverty line (60).
Apart from minimum wage discussions, a recent report from the OECD suggested that carried interest--the share of
profits that money managers take in from an investment or fund--should be taxed as regular income rather than as
returns on investment. Ian Ayres, professor of law at Yale, and Aaron S. Edlin, professor of law and economics at the
University of California, Berkley, proposed an automatic extra tax, the so-called Brandeis tax, on the income of the top
1% of earners that would limit the after-tax incomes relative to median household income (61).
Warren Buffett, the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway, who consistently ranks among the world's
wealthiest people, has long argued along similar lines. He claimed that his 2010 federal tax bill--income taxes and
payroll taxes--amounted to 17.4% of his taxable income (62). That, he wrote, was the lowest percentage of any of the
other 20 people in his office, whose tax burdens were between 33% and 41% and averaged 36%.
Meanwhile, two Democratic California legislators--Loni Hancock and Mark DeSaulnier--have proposed tying the
state's corporate income tax to the ratio of CEO-to-worker pay--a sliding scale in which a company's tax bill could
shrink along with the gap in pay between executives and workers. The change would trim a company's tax rate for any
corporation in which the chief executive makes less than a hundred times what the median worker earns.
Any clear-headed consideration of these options must recognize that heavy taxation--solely to reduce wage
inequality--could do more damage than good. While the IMF studies found that some redistribution appears benign,
extreme cases may have a direct negative effect on growth. Heavy taxation solely to equalize wages may reduce
incentives to work or hire more workers. A number of studies have indicated that losses from redistribution are likely
to be minimal when tax rates are low but rise steeply with the tax or subsidy rate (63).
IMF authors Ostry, Berg, and Tsangarides note that ""redistribution need not be inherently detrimental to growth, to the
degree that it involves reducing tax expenditures or loopholes that benefit the rich or as part of broader tax reforms
(such as higher inheritance taxes offset by lower taxes on labor income)"" (63). Moreover, redistribution can also occur
when taxes finance public investment, or spending on health and education disproportionately benefits the poor, which
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 20
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
help offset the growing divide in educational opportunities and outcomes, broadening the pathways for our future
leaders, to the benefit of all.
That said, some degree of rebalancing--along with spending in the areas of education, health care, and infrastructure,
for example--could help bring under control an income gap that, at its current level, threatens the stability of an
economy still struggling to recover. This could take the form of reallocating fiscal resources toward those with a
greater propensity to spend, or toward badly needed public resources like roads, ports, and transit. Further, policies
that foster job-rich recoveries may help make growth more sustainable, especially given that rising unemployment
correlates with rising income concentration. Additionally, effective investments in health and education promote
durable growth and equity, strengthening the labor force's capacity to cope with new technologies.
The challenge now is to find a path toward more sustainable growth, an essential part of which, in our view, is pulling
more Americans out of poverty and bolstering the purchasing power of the middle class. A rising tide lifts all
boats…but a lifeboat carrying a few, surrounded by many treading water, risks capsizing.
Writer: Joe Maguire
Glossary Of Relevant Terms
Market income
Based on CBO analysis, market income includes the following components:
• Labor income: cash wages and salaries (including 401(k) plans), employer-paid health insurance premiums, and the
employer's share of Social Security, Medicare, and federal unemployment insurance payroll taxes.
• Business income: net income from businesses and farms operated solely by their owners, partnership income, and
income from S corporations.
• Capital gains: profits realized from the sale of assets. Increases in the value of assets that have not been realized
through sales are not included in market income.
• Capital income (excluding capital gains): taxable and tax-exempt interest, dividends paid by corporations (excluding
S corporations), positive rental income, and corporate income taxes. The CBO assumes that corporate income taxes
are borne by owners of capital in proportion to their income from capital, so the corporate tax is included in
household income before taxes.
• Other income: retirement income for past services and any other sources of income.
Transfer income
Transfer income includes cash payments from Social Security, unemployment insurance, Supplemental Security
Income, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, veterans' benefits,
workers' compensation, and state and local government assistance programs, as well as the value of in-kind benefits,
including food stamps, school lunches and breakfasts, housing assistance, energy assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, and
the Children's Health Insurance Program (health benefits are measured as the fungible value, a Census Bureau
estimate of the value to recipients).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 21
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
After-tax income
After-tax income is equal to market income plus transfer income minus federal taxes paid. In assessing the impact of
various taxes, individual income taxes are allocated directly to households paying those taxes. Social insurance, or
payroll, taxes are allocated to households paying those taxes directly or paying them indirectly through their
employers. Corporate income taxes are allocated to households according to their share of capital income. Federal
excise taxes are allocated to households according to their consumption of the taxed good or service.
Average tax rates are calculated by dividing federal taxes paid by the sum of market income and transfer income.
Negative tax rates result from refundable tax credits, such as the earned income and child tax credits, exceeding the
other taxes owed by people in an income group. (Refundable tax credits are not limited to the amount of income tax
owed before they are applied.)
The Gini Index
The Gini Index is a measure of income inequality based on the relationship between shares of income and shares of
the population. It is a value between 0 and 1.0, with 0 indicating complete equality and 1.0 indicating complete
inequality (in which one household receives all the income). A Gini Index that increases over time indicates rising
income dispersion.
Chart 8 details
Data from Berg, Ostry, and Zettelmeyer (2008).
Authors' calculations: The height of each factor represents the percentage change in a growth spell between 1950 and
2006 when the factor moves from the 50th percentile to the 60th percentile and all other factors are held constant.
Income distribution uses the Gini coefficient. The political institutions factor is based on an index from the Polity IV
Project database that ranges from +10 for the most open and democratic societies to –10 for the most closed and
autocratic. Trade openness measures the effect of changes in trade liberalization on year-to-year growth.
Exchange-rate competitiveness is calculated as the deviation of an exchange rate from purchasing power parity,
adjusted for per capita income.
Endnotes
(1) ""The General Theory,"" J. M. Keynes
(2) Rajan, ""Fault Lines,"" 2010
(3) CBO, ""Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between 1979 and 2007,"" 2011; ""The Distribution of
Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2010,"" 2013; OECD, 2011; Jonathan D. Ostry, Andrew Berg, and Charalambos
G. Tsangarides, ""Redistribution, Inequality and Growth,"" IMF February 2014; Berg and Ostry, ""Inequality and
Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin?,"" IMF April 2011; Berg and Ostry, ""Equality and Efficiency,"" IMF
September 2011
(4) ""An Overview of Growing Income Inequalities in OECD Countries: Main Findings,"" OECD, 2011
(5) CBO, 2013
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 22
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
(6) To the extent that households benefit from company-sponsored health plans whose costs have risen sharply, these
figures may be somewhat understated.
(7) Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, ""Income Inequality in the U.S., 1913-1998,"" 2003
(8) Emmanuel Saez, ""Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the U.S.,"" 2013
(9) CBO, 2011
(10) ""Capital,"" Thomas Piketty
(11) CBO, 2011
(12) The globalization of the world economy may have affected the distribution of wage rates at home. The U.S. has
seen international trade and immigration increase in the past few decades, as well as an increase in the consumption of
imported goods. Theoretically, an increase in imported goods, at the expense of domestic goods produced by
lower-skilled workers, could hold down wages of domestic workers, though research on the subject has been
inconclusive. An increase in the supply of foreign-born workers could also put pressure on wages in those jobs. But,
here as well, the effects of foreign workers on wage rates have been modest. Indeed, research note that immigrant
workers largely complement, rather than substitute, native-born workers, and thus have little impact on wages, while
actually increasing overall growth.
(13) David Card, Thomas Lemieux, and Craig Riddell, ""Unions and Wage Inequality,"" December 2004; ""Interview with
David Card,"" Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Dec. 1, 2006
(14) ""Capital,"" Thomas Piketty
(15) CBO, 2011
(16) CBO, 2011
(17) CBO, 2013
(18) CBO, 2013
(19) CBO, 2013. The CBO noted that other transfers declined from nearly 3% to under 2%. Transfers to low-income
households, such as Aid to Families With Dependent Children and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, declined
relative to market income.
(20) For example, the Bush Administration tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 reduced the income tax rate, capital gains tax
rate, and dividend tax rate. Earlier, the tax cuts under President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s lowered the top individual
income tax rate to 28% from 50%. There was no reduction to the payroll tax rate until the Payroll Tax Holiday of 2010.
(21) CBO, 2013
(22) CBO, 2011; taxfoundation.org, ""Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History""
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 23
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
(23) Census, ""Changes in Household Net Worth from 2005 to 2010,"" July 2012,
http://blogs.census.gov/2012/06/18/changes-in-household-net-worth-from-2005-to-2010/
(24) Goldin and Katz, ""The Race Between Education and Technology,"" Cambridge, MA; Belknap Press, 2009
(25) ""Thirteen Economic Facts about Social Mobility and the Role of Education,"" Michael Greenstone, Adam Looney,
Jeremy Patashnik, and Muxin Yu, Hamilton Project-Brookings, 2013
(26) Hamilton Project-Brookings, 2013
(27) Sean F. Reardon, ""The Widening Academic Achievement Gap between the Rich and the Poor: New Evidence and
Possible Explanations,"" 2011 ""In Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality and the Uncertain Life Chances of
Low-Income Children,"" edited by Greg J. Duncan and Richard J. Murnane. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
(28) Hamilton Project-Brookings, 2013
(29) Goldin and Katz, 2009.
(30) Barro, Robert and Jong-Wha Lee, ""A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010."" Journal
of Development Economics, Vol 104.
(31) Lily French and Peter S. Fisher, ""Education Pays in Iowa: The State's Return on Investment in Workforce
Education,"" May 2009
(32) Deming, David, and Susan Dynarski, ""Into College, Out of Poverty? Policies to Increase the Postsecondary
Attainment of the Poor,"" National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 2009
(33) Hamilton Project-Brookings, 2013
(34) Goldin and Katz, 2009
(35) Goldin and Katz, 2009
(36) Goldin and Katz, 2009, Rajan, 2010, Hamilton Project-Brookings, 2013
(37) ""A Well-Educated Workforce is Key To State Prosperity,"" Economic Analysis and Research Network, 2014
(38) ""The Effects of Investing in Early Education on Economic Growth,"" The Brookings Institution, 2006
(39) Atif Mian and Amir Sufi, ""Household Balance Sheets, Consumption and the Economic Slump,"" 2013
(40) Atif Mian and Amir Sufi, ""House Price Gains and U.S. Household Spending from 2002 to 2006,"" 2014.
(41) Atif Mian and Amir Sufi, ""House Prices, Home Equity-based Borrowing, and the U.S. Household Leverage Crisis,""
American Economic Review, August 2011.
(42) Rajan, 2010. He argues that political measures to increase affordable housing for low-income groups instructed
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to develop affordable housing goals for Fannie and
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 24
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
Freddie and to monitor those goals. HUD then steadily increased the amount of funding it required the agencies to
allocate to low-income housing. Pressure on regulators to enforce the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), through
investigations of banks and fines, may have increased lending activity in these areas.
(43) Kumhof and Ranciere, ""Inequality, Leverage and Crises,"" IMF 2010.
(44) ""Inequality, the Great Recession and Slow Recovery,"" Barry Z. Cynamon, visiting scholar at the Federal Reserve
Bank of St. Louis, and Steven M. Fazzari, economics professor at Washington University, January 2014.
(45) ""The Road to Recovery,"" Andrew Smithers
(46) ""Economy May Never Fully Recover from Crisis"", The Fiscal Times. June 2, 2014.
(47) CBO long-Term Budget Outlook 2014. July 2014. ""IMF cuts US growth forecast as it urges minimum wage hike "",
BBC, June 16, 2014
(48) ""Crisis Yesterday and Today,"" Lawrence Summers, Jacques Pollack lecture, IMF.
(49) ""Secular Stagnation and Wealth Inequality"", Mian and Sufi, March 23, 2014)
(50) OECD Economic Surveys: United States. June 2014
(51) Jonathan D. Ostry, Andrew Berg, and Charalambos G. Tsangarides, ""Redistribution, Inequality and Growth,"" IMF
February 2014; Berg and Ostry, ""Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin?,"" IMF April 2011;
Berg and Ostry, ""Equality and Efficiency,"" IMF September 2011.
(52) ""Growth Accelerations,"" a study by Ricardo Hausmann and Dani Rodrik of Harvard University's John F. Kennedy
School of Government, and Lant Pritchett of the World Bank, 2005
(53) CBO, 2013
(54) Arthur Okun theorized that some of the redistributed resources would ""simply disappear"" because of
administrative costs and disincentives to work for both those who pay taxes and those who receive transfers.
(55) ""A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth,"" Kristin J. Forbes, M.I.T. Sloan School of
Management, 2000
(56) Roy van der Weide and Branko Milanovic, ""Inequality Is Bad for Growth of the Poor,"" July 2014
(57) ""The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth"" Benjamin Friedman
(58) ""IMF calls on the US to hike its minimum wage rate,"" CNBC, June 16, 2014
(59) CBO, ""The Effects of a Minimum-Wage Increase on Employment and Family Income,"" February 2014
(60) Mark Wilson, ""The Negative Effects of Minimum Wage Laws,"" CATO Institute, June 2012.
(61) ""Don't Tax the Rich. Tax Inequality Itself,"" 2011 op-ed in the New York Times
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 25
1351366 | 302136118
Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways
To Change The Tide
(62) ""Stop Coddling the Super-Rich,"" 2011 op-ed in the New York Times
(63) Barro R.J., ""Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth,"" Journal of Political Economy,
1990; Jaimovich, N. and S. Rebelo, ""Non-Linear Effects of Taxation on Growth,"" NBER, 2012
(64) Jonathan D. Ostry, Andrew Berg, and Charalambos G. Tsangarides, February 2014; Saint-Paul, G., and T. Verdier,
""Education, Democracy and Growth,"" Journal of Development Economics, 1993
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 26
1351366 | 302136118
Copyright © 2014 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved.
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part
thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval
system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be
used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not
responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for
the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an ""as is"" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING
WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no
event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential
damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by
negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and
not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase,
hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to
update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment
and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does
not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be
reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain
regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P
Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any
damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective
activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established
policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P
reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites,
www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com
(subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information
about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT AUGUST 5, 2014 27
1351366 | 302136118
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021354.txt,"In this hierarchy one member—the
human—had stepped beyond its
assigned place in the cosmic society and
now lived in an unwitting complacency,
ignoring the precarious finitude of a life
being pursued by a radical judgment:
“tis nothing but [God’s] hand that holds
you from falling into the fire every
moment: ’tis to be ascribed to nothing
else, that you did not go to hell the last
night; that you was suffered to awake
again in this world, after you closed your
eyes to sleep: And there is no other
reason to be given, why you have not
dropped into hell since you arose in the
morning, but that God’s hand has held
you up.”

Like his contemporaries, the
deists and religiously inclined scientists
such as Newton himself, Jonathan
Edwards assumed the “Newtonian world
machine,” operating with the
metronomic regularity of natural law.
Presupposing both the science and the
aristocratic social hierarchy of his day,
Edward introduced anthropomorphic
language to create a clash between this
harmonious order and the willful self-
interest of humans who dared to ignore
their proper rung on the ladder of
existence. As a preacher of penitence,
he carried his anthropomorphic imagery
to extravagant heights in order to induce
a reversal of behavior in a recalcitrant
town. The sermon effectively threatened
the people of Enfield with what
amounted to “metaphysical ostracism,”
an expulsion no less thoroughgoing than
the primordial ejection of Adam and Eve
from the garden. The palpable effect of
this imagery depended on the evocation
of the natural and social orders rising up
like, and yet unlike, an angry monarch to
crush rebels against the cosmic
commonwealth.

108

_
Q

Page

&

¢

References

""Tn the interests of clarity, I have
slightly rearranged and modernized this
quotation. It and all quotations from
Edwards’s sermon are taken from Jonathan
Edwards, Sermons and Discourses, 1739-
1742, ed. Harry S. Stout and Nathan O.
Hatch, with Kyle P. Farley, The Works of
Jonathan Edwards 22 (New Haven: Yale
University Press, 2003), 404-18.

' Social scientific analysis of the relation
between anthropomorphism and religion is
summarized by Steward Elliot Guthrie, who
argues “religion is anthropomorphism” in
his book Faces in the Clouds: A New
Theory of Religion (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1993), 178. The most
lucid and succinct historical treatment
remains Frank E. Manuel, 7he Fighteenth
Century Confronts the Gods (Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1959).

'Thave in mind such authors as John
William Draper, History of the Conflict
between Religion and Science (1874), and
Andrew Dickson White, A History of the
Warfare of Science with Theology in
Christendom (1896). For a more recent
example, see Richard Dawkins, The God
Delusion (Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
2008).

' Charles Taylor, A Secular Age
(Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
2007), 270-95.

' For a sampling of relevant recent
work, see Philip Husbands, Owen Holland,
and Michael Wheeler, eds., The Mechanical
Mind in History (Cambridge: MIT Press,
2008); and Lorraine Daston and Gregg
Mitman, eds., Thinking with Animals: New
Perspectives on Anthropomorphism (New
York: Columbia University Press, 2005).
Ralph Waldo Emerson made the classic
American argument for the positive
reciprocity between the human and the
natural. This idea of mutuality takes a
different turn in our contemporary situation,
in which industrial and technological

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021354
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028335.txt,"efff6d135079"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":828, ""width"":1400},""filesi
ze"":0, ""identifier"": ""87dad0d1-634c-4dce-973c
efff6d135079"", ""imageIdentifier"":""a6éaca5684809e23 30274 Jeel80cc681b"", ""type"": ""image""},""897
97d4d-ce29-464d-ad49-524c7Tcbh6fcd9"": {""URL"": ""asset://89797d4d-ce29-464d-ad49
S24c7)cbh6fcd9"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":639,""width"":1080},""filesi
ze"":0, ""identifier"": ""89797d4d-ce29-464d-ad49
S24c7)cbh6éficd9"",""imageldentifier"":""abaca5684809e2330274Jeel80cc681ib"", ""type"": ""image""},""93d
32908-dfbe-4cld-914c-0e9c7b36ab38"":{""URL"": ""asset: //93d32908-dfbe-4cld-914c
Oe9c7Tb36ab38"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":200,""width"":300},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"":""93d32908-dfbe-4cld-914c
Oe9cTb36ab38"", ""imagelIdentifier"":""20ldb923dcle64edbc8ec419b342dcca"", ""type"": ""image""},""96e
bOca9-a299-4639-9548-badf4ba837a8"":{""URL"": ""asset: //96eb0ca9-a299-4e39-9548
badft4ba837a8"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":200,""width"":300},""filesiz
e"":0,""identifier"":""96eb0ca9-a299-4639-9548
badft4ba837a8"",""imageldentifier"":""2/Jeff60f48l7laefebficc876def040c3"", ""type"": ""image""},""a78&
36645-b84f-4309-b9b2-23f3d95b77b0"": {""URL"": ""asset: //a7836645-b84f-4309-b9b2
23f£3d95b77b0"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":376, ""width"":750},""filesiz
e"":0,""identifier"":""a7836645-b84f-4309-b9b2
23f3d95b77b0"", ""imageIdentifier"":""00b9f5401le2c9ca307b15e3ee9d63a6"", ""type"": ""image""™}, ""b09
la36b-dde4-409e-9ec7-728b0cbde7c8"":{""URL"": ""asset: //b091a36b-dde4-409e-9ec7
T28b0cbdc7c8"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":500,""width"":750},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""b091a36b-dde4-409e-9ec7
T28b0cbdc7c8"",""imageldentifier"":""20ldb923dcle64edbc8ec419b342dceca"", ""type"": ""image""},""b5a
553c0-146c-41ba-b6bb-2a70d9e6a578"": {""URL"": ""asset: //b5a553c0-146c-41ba-b6bb
2a70d9e6a578"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":500, ""width"":750},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""b5a553c0-146c-41ba-bébb
2a70d9e6a578"",""imageIdentifier"":""27effe0rt48lJlaefebficc876def040c3"", ""type""™:""image""},""c07
190£3-9631-467b-859b-42c9f779b30£"":{""URL"": ""asset: //c07190£3-9631-467b-859b
42c9f£779b30£"", ""classification"": ""font"", ""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"": {""familyName"": ""Balt
o"", ""style"": ""italic"", ""weight"":400, ""width"":""normal""}, ""fontName"":""Balto-
BookItalic"", ""identifier"": ""c07190f3-9631-467b-859b
42c9f779b30F"", ""type"": ""font""}, ""d2cfa895-6a42-4063-aa30
7d67b32£9fal"":{""URL"": ""asset: //d2cfa895-6a42-4063-aa30
7d67b32f9fal"", ""classification"": ""font"", ""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"": {""familyName"": ""Balt
o"", ""style"":""normal"", ""weight"":400, ""width"":""normal""}, ""fontName"":""Balto-
Book"", ""identifier"": ""d2cfa895-6a42-4063-aa30-7d67b32f9fal"", ""type"": ""font""}, ""d32bd96a-
B8ace-40ac-aa2c-12d21f£0de426"": {""URL"": ""asset: //d32bd96a-Sace-40ac-aa2c
12d21f£0de426"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":720,""width"":1080},""fileSi
ze"":0, ""identifier"": ""d32bd96a-8ace-4A0ac-aa2ec
12d21f£0de426"", ""imageIdentifier"":""2/7eff60f48lJlaefebicc87/6def040c3"", ""type"": ""image""}, ""e08
Acdf£1-2346e-41a9-9clc-330281cb5ecbh"":{""URL"": ""asset: //e084cdf1-2346-41a9-9cle
33028icb5ecbh"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":933,""width"":1400},""filesi
ze"":0,""identifier”™: ""e084cdf1-234e-41a9-9cle
33028icb5ecb"", ""imageldentifier"":""20ldb923dclet4edbc8ec419b342dcca"", ""type"": ""image""},""el4
0c63d-8dd8-4a87-974d-llcdb67b3fee"": {""URL"": ""asset: //e140c63d-8dd8-4a87-974d
licdb6é7b3tfee"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":933,""width"":1400},""fileSi
ze"":0, ""identifier"": ""el40c63d-8dd8-4a87-974d
licdb6é7b3fee"", ""imageldentifier"":""2/7eff60f481l7laefebficc87/6def040c3"", ""type"": ""image""},""e22
5e5e5 9b-4958-8d9b-9a6150132462"":{""URL"": ""asset: //e225e5e5 9b-4958-8d9b
9a6150132462"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":810, ""width"":1080},""fileSi
ze"":0, ""identifier"": ""e225e5e5 9b-4958-8d9b
9a6150132462"",""imageldentifier"":""8096acac060567f5067958fFf6553aldl7"", ""type"": ""image""},""e95
afe2d-5e2f-4640-ad55-19b9189abf03"": {""URL"": ""asset: //e95afe2d-5e2f-4640-ad55
19b9189abf03"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":444, ""width"":750},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""e95afe2d-S5e2f-4640-ad55
19b9189abf03"", ""imageIdentifier"":""atbaca5684809e23302747eel80cc681b"", ""type"": ""image""}, ""£94
125¢-33a2-4792-ael10-39aeba85656a"": {""URL"": ""asset: //£94e125c-33a2-4792-ael0
39aeba85656a"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":200,""width"":300},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""f£94e125c-33a2-4792-ael0
39aeba85656a"", ""imageldentifier"":""394ad56afbf68962175acle3ch8adf99"",""type"":""image""}},""sp
ecVersion"":""1.6"",""subtitle"":""Dueling leaks told many different stories on
Monday."",""textStyles"":{"" anf-ts-1"":{""identifier"":"" anf-ts-
i"",""liststyle™: [{""depth"":0,""indices"":[0,1,2,3,4],""style""™:""bullet""}]},""_anf-ts-
2"": {""fontAttributes"":{""style"":""italic""}, ""fontName"":""Balto-
BookItalic"",""identifier"":"" anf-ts-2""}},""title"":""Is Rod Rosenstein fired, resigning, or
staying? The drama, explained."",""version"":""1.0""}

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028335
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014718.txt,"/ VAT is revenue neutral — would raise enough revenue to cut corporate tax rate to 15%, even 10% possibly

7 While consumption taxes like VAT can hit the poor (Democrats hate them), there is room for carve-outs on
groceries, etc. There will be pushback from Republicans who hate lack of visibility of VAT as well. Only person who can
pass this is Trump.

° Under BAT, the working class is arguably hit even worse than under VAT

) BAT would cause prices to go up at WMT and TGT (most of Trump’s supporters shop there)

) Retailers would raise prices but exporters won’t lower prices

fe) 5% VAT will result in a smaller average rise in prices (not entirely passed through), so less disruptive — would
need USD to strengthen only 3-4%

° Where does this leave us? Only Trump can cut through the logjam.

uel

° Other anecdotes
) Regardless of your political preference, he thinks we all need Trump to succeed or the economy will get Bernie
Sanders or worse.

) Tillerson vs Kerry — Woo thinks Tillerson is actually working and getting things done, as opposed to Kerry who

just cared about the Nobel.

7 Thus sees zero risk of a trade war with China

7 NAFTA is really more about China, not Mexico - and will ultimately benefit Mexico. Renegotiating NAFTA will
remove the ability for Chinese exports to come in tariff-free through Mexico.

fe) Mnuchin and Cohn really know what they’re doing and Woo thinks they will get there on VAT / tax reform

e Cases for tax reform

de, US marginal tax rate = 35 % = highest among OECD = diminished returns to investment > solution = decrease
marginal tax rate

2. US taxed on global income vs. territorial like other major economies. Issue because 1) US companies hold over

$2t in capital overseas and 2) US companies acquiring smaller foreign companies to relocate headquarters
internationally > solution = shift to territorial tax system

3. US = only OECD country w/ no VAT which puts US produced goods at disadvantage. (VAT — producer of exported
goods get rebate while importers pay) > solution = create VAT

° Solutions have nothing to do with stimulus, will allow companies to take risk, invest, grow, and critical for global
growth for next 10 yrs

And from earlier presentations/calls:

1. He mentioned on our March 1* tax reform call that the US is the only country amongst OECD without a VAT.
BMW’s thus cost less in the US than in Germany, as foreign companies get a VAT rebate when they export. US
companies do not and they have to pay import tax. He views tax reform as very bullish for USD and yields (bearish for
bond prices) and thinks the market is underpricing this. His rationale for the bullish USD and higher yields story is that
tax reform encourages more money to come home to the US, adds US investment, evens the playing field for US
companies — all good for US growth longer term and bullish the dollar. He had wanted tax reform by the August recess
but then Senate would need to pass the bill by July, so they would need a bill to work with by May for the House to pass
it in May — which means they need a bill to work with by the end of March (running out of time!) BAT is the only really
controversial aspect holding back tax reform even though it’s a small part (2 paragraphs of the 50-page Ryan-Brady plan)
— still vague on details but he hoped they’re learning from their mistake of releasing a half-baked travel ban that
imploded after a week.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014718
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027006.txt,"open-ended autonomous learning and language
acquisition.

Integration of perception and action. Environmental
interaction is (at least partially) a control process that
requires a modeling of the relationship between sensory
data and operations performed by the system.

(Semi-) Universal problem solving, enabling paradigms
of learning, planning, reasoning, analogies, language
acquisition and reflection.

A structured memory, including provisions for a
world /situation model, a protocol of environmental
interactions, procedural memory, declarative and
typological abstractions, a model of self, and a ‘mental
stage’, to facilitate anticipation and planning.

Decision making and motivational mechanisms, to
address both autonomous, goal-directed cognition in
complex, open domains, and the genesis of goals and
intentions.

The direction and modulation of attention, and the
emergence of emotion and affect, which are
configurational aspects of cognition that either reflect the
allocation of cognitive resources, or structure social
interaction.

Constraints for Mental Representations

Based on the emergent paradigm of a new generation of

cognitive architectures, we can think about mental

representations in a new and productive way. More specifically,

we know that mental representations include perceptual and

propositional/conceptual content and we are aware of many

constraints. Mental representations must

Offer support for both connectionist and symbolic
processing (including compositionality and grammatical
structures), with the latter one being a special case of the
former

Possess a hierarchical structure, bottoming out in
sensory perception

Cover prototypes, individuals and abstractions

Include perceptual and relational features, objects,
situations, and episodic knowledge

Allow simulation of dynamic processes

Solve the bridge problem between fuzzy associative
hierarchies and the discrete symbol strings of natural
language

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027006
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015406.txt,"In an email to her 7umb/r blogger friend, she accused Tosh of saying
that “rape jokes are always funny, how can a rape joke not be funny, rape
jokes are hilarious.” She was so offended that she felt morally compelled
to shout, “Actually, rape jokes are never funny!” Tosh paused and then
seized the opportunity, responding, “Wouldn’ t it be funny if that girl got
raped by like five guys? Like right now? What if a bunch of guys just raped
her?” The audience laughed raucously. After all, isn’ t anyone who yells
at a comedian practically asking to become an immediate target? But this
woman was stunned and humiliated, and she left. In the lobby, she
demanded to see the manager, who apologized profusely and gave her
free tickets for another night--admitting, however, that she understood if

this woman never wanted to return.

In her email, she concluded that, “having to basically flee while
Tosh was enthusing about how hilarious it would be if | was gang-raped in
that small, claustrophobic room was pretty viscerally terrifying and
threatening all the same, even if the actual scenario was unlikely to take

place. The suggestion of it is violent enough and was meant to put me in

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015406
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018324.txt,"Chapter Six:
Warez Dudes

In which the Seventh Sense reveals a secret, dangerous architecture of connection.
1.

It was my second overseas trip. I blinked my eyes as dawn broke over Europe and
seeped inside the airplane. We began our descent into Amsterdam. | changed the
tapes inside my Walkman. Something a bit more upbeat seemed right. Peter Gabriel.
It was 1993. August.

Earlier that spring I’d heard about a plan for a giant summer computer hacking
conference that would be held outside Amsterdam. “Hacking at the End of the
Universe” it was to be called. | can’t recall now where | had picked up news of the
gathering, but it appealed to me immediately. I’d just moved to New York and had
been dipping into the city’s hacking scene. The “scene” was less a boiling, hip hive of
action than a group of computer amateurs, curious hangers on and early IT system
engineers who would gather in the grubby basement of the Citicorp Building on 53""
Street and Lexington some days after work to discuss various techniques for
tricking digital systems of all types. Hacking didn't have a deeply nefarious
connotation in those days; it was seen by most of us as a natural, even a healthy
extension of an interest in computers. The Internet had about 10 million users at the
time. The idea that, two decades later, it would connect more than three billion
people or that it would put millions of dollars into the pockets of some of the people
gathering in that basement was honestly unthinkable.

The bible of the group was a thin, irregularly stapled, photocopied magazine
published out on Long Island by a guy who used the nom-de-hack of Emmanuel
Goldstein, the hero of George Orwell’s novel 1984. The magazine was called “2600:
The Hacker Quarterly” and it offered a compilation of ideas about how to fool
around with systems of all sorts, from Atari gaming consoles to door locks. The
name “2600” came from one of the earliest hacks any of us at those little meetings
knew about, a famous 1970’s trick that involved using an audio tone at exactly 2600
hertz (about the pitch of a truck’s backup warning) to force the backbone routing
switches of the AT&T phone system to give up access to an “operator mode” which
would let the phone hacker - they were called phreakers - make any sort of call for
free. The hack didn’t really offer much practical pleasure except a chance to make
free phone calls anywhere in the world. Once you'd mastered the trick you pretty
quickly discovered there wasn't really anyone in Bombay you wanted to call
anyhow.

The real appeal, the deeper joy of the game, was different: It was the sense of secret,
ecstatic access. A feeling of control in the largest network on earth. At one pointa
phreaker named John Draper figured out that the little plastic whistles stuffed as
children’s toys inside boxes of sugary Cap’n Crunch cereal produced the 2600 Hz
tone nearly perfectly. The hack made him a legend. He became known, inevitably, as

92

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018324
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025258.txt,"Section 2

Asset class views

2 UBS

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025258
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017017.txt,", (comma)

> (greater-than)
? (question-mark)
/ (forward-slash)
~ (tilde)

* (back-tick)
“(double quote)

(3) The following characters are not tokenized as separate words:
& (ampersand)
__ (underscore)

Examples of the resulting words include AT&T, R&D, and variable names such as
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE.

(4) . (period) is treated as a separate word, except when it is part of a number or price, such as 99.99 or
$999.95. A specific pattern matcher looks for numbers or prices and tokenizes these special strings as
separate words.

(5) $ (dollar-sign) is treated as a separate word, except where it is the first character of a word consisting
entirely of numbers, possibly containing a decimal point. Examples include $71 and $9.95

(6) # (hash) is treated as a separate word, except when it is preceded by a-g, j or x. This covers musical
notes such as A# (A-sharp), and programming languages j#, and x#.

(7) + (plus) is treated as a separate word, except it appears at the end of a sequence of alphanumeric
characters or “+” s. Thus the strings C++ and Na2+ would be treated as single words. These cases
include many programming language names and chemical compound names.

(8) ' (apostrophe/single-quote) is treated as a separate word, except when it precedes the letter s, as in
ALICE'S and Bob's

The tokenization process for Chinese was. different. For Chinese, an_ internal CJK
(Chinese/Japanese/Korean) segmenter was used to break characters into word units. The CJK
segmenter inserts spaces along common semantic boundaries. Hence, 1-grams that appear in the
Chinese simplified corpora will sometimes contain strings with 1 or more Chinese characters.

Given a sequence of n 1-grams, we denote the corresponding n-gram by concatenating the 1-grams with
a plain space character in between. A few examples of the tokenization and 1-gram construction method
are provided in Table $2.

Each book edition was broken down into a series of 1-grams on a page-by-page basis. For each page of
each book, we counted the number of times each 1-gram appeared. We further counted the number of
times each n-gram appeared (e.g., a sequence of n 1-grams) for all n less than or equal to 5. Because
this was done on a page-by-page basis, n-grams that span two consecutive pages were not counted.

9

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017017
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030420.txt,"Date: Wednesday, March 9 2011 01:51 AM 
Subject: Re: 
From: Steve Hanson < 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com; 
Hey. Just landed from LA. You around for a call- no rush- when ur free /tell me 
Hope your ok 
Xxoo 
Sent from Steve Hanson's Blackberry 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission and any file or previous e-mail attached to it is intended to be viewed only by the party to 
which it is addressed and may contain valuable business information that is confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure under 
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, dissemination or use of any of the 
information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Thank you for your cooperation. 
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
To: Steve Hanson 
Sent: Tue Mar 08 15:32:12 2011 
Subject: 
Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance < 
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-
couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> 
by Vicky Ward <http://wwwvaniryfaircomkontributors/vicky-  ward> 
March 8,2011, 2:30 PM 
""I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will never 
think the same way about anything again."" 
So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment 
as the alleged ""procurer"" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. 
Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another 
investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested 
them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's 
friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal. 
I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called ""The Talented Mr. Epstein."" It was largely a business piece that focused on his 
mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited 
Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail 
sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. 
The piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had 
sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how 
Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. 
This is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing 
financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-
chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? 
And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, 
my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030420 
Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of 
them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet 
behind him, as if serving a monarch. ""Do they speak?"" I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He 
laughed. ""Not like you, Vicky,"" was his riposte. 
I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't studied math 
since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a 
book: ""Math for idiots."" 
So he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. 
""Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,"" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly 
preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and 
you know this to be true. 
When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that ""Andy""—as Jeffrey 
calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing's 
for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far more than ""Andy"" does. Which is 
why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him. 
And Ghislaine? 
Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. 
She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking to her about 
the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom 
of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away 
almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for 
hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends. 
Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known 
fondly to her close friends as ""the Tennis Goddess"") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she 
really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. 
And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. 
""He saved her,"" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. ""When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then 
Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will."" 
In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her 
father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's 
father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive ""black hole"" he'd fraudulently created. To 
Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange. 
In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end 
either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid 
paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top by being the world's most 
balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second 
""wife"" for many years whose existence he has been open about. 
So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends 
like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one 
sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030421 
- 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030422 
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033391.txt,"From: J [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 11/20/2018 6:44:25 PM 
To: Larry Summers 
Subject: Re: 
steady crazy , but now frightened.. yes quiet... lets see if the pace picks up or slows, she's already 
begining to sound needy :) nice 
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:36 PM Larry Summers wrote: 
Think no response for a while probably appropriate. 
Just had lunch w Jamie D 
Is trump getting crazier as many of my pals think or is it steady crazy. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: Keyu Jin________________________ 
Date: November 20, 2018 at 12:46:35 PM EST 
To: Larry Summers______________________ 
Did RA come back with answers to the yellow highlighted? did you take a look at the section that was written 
up? apart from your revision of intro there was the first section. 
Keyu Jin 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033391 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033392 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012708.txt,"MASTER CONTACT LIST REGARDING Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman

| | CONTACT NAME IDENTITY
Adam Steinberg Attorney RRA |
Alan Garten Donald Trump’s attorney
Amy Ederi Robert Josefsberg’s daughter
Amy Swan Expert in Epstein Case
Anthony P RRA CLIENT
Attorneys at RRA
Barry Stone Attorney RRA
Bert Patton Legal Assistant to Robert Josefsberg
Beth Williamson Paralegal RRA
Bradley Edwards Attorney RRA
Cara Holmes Attorney RRA
Carl Linder Attorney RRA
Carla Martinez Law Clerk at RRA
Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel)
Carolyn Edwards (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel)
Confidential Source
Christina Fitch Staff RRA

| Denis Kleinfeld Attorney RRA
D.F. Client (Epstein Case)
Dr. Lee Expert (Epstein Case)
Earleen Cote Attorney

Elizabeth Kim Paralegal RRA

Elizabeth Villar Legal Assistant RRA
Attorney RRA
Attorney RRA
Prior Paralegal to Robert Josefsberg

Gary Farmer
Grant Smith
Ileana Yarzabal

Investigators
Jack Hill
Jack Scarola

Investigators RRA

Counsel for other Epstein Victims

Counsel for other Epstein Victims
Jacquie Johnson Paralegal RRA
Josh Roberts Attorney
Jonathan Birkman Attorney RRA

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012708
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018745.txt,"tents

Executive Summary

The OFPCTING ......ccecececeeeeseeeeeeeeeeesceeeeeseeesssneessaeeeeseseecseeesesenseessneeessanes

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018745
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016127.txt,"Chart 12: Breakdown of expenditure on inbound tourist trips Chart 13: Inbound tourist trips to Saudi Arabia by country of origin
SARbn mame Other
80 mums Religious 80
mmm Business
mass Family visits
ms Holidays
60 religious tourism (% of t ~ 10
40 ~ 60
20 - 50
0 a mGCC sMiddle East mAsia mEurope mAfrica “America
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Source: SAMA, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Source: SAMA, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 2015.

Mixed prospects for fiscal consolidation

The apparent redistribution of part of the proceeds of the flagship fiscal measures
towards funding the NTP initiatives suggests that the fiscal consolidation efforts could
fall short of the necessary requirement to narrow imbalances materially in the absence
of a sustained oil price recovery. We calculate that the NTP targets a total net
cumulative fiscal consolidation effort of SAR648bn (US$172.8bn) or c1% of GDP
annually, assuming progressive and full implementation of the non-oil revenue targets.

Energy policy needs to support economic transformation

Energy policy is likely to be less aggressive going forward, particularly as the NTP
suggests a constant oil production capacity as well as an increase in gas production
domestically which could free up domestic crude for exports. To remain consistent with
the targeted government debt accumulation path, we estimate that oil prices have to
average at least US$50/bbl in 2016-20 along with no growth in spending from 2016
levels (excluding the additional cost of NTP initiatives but including implementation of
the NTP non-oil revenue measures). Oil prices of at least cCUS$65/bbl would be required
if spending is not disciplined or revenue targets are missed by c50%, in our view.

Blueprint for fiscal measures lacks details

The approved NTP initiatives will have a total fiscal cost of SAR268bn (USS71.5bn;
11.6% of GDP) spread over five years (annually, SAR54bn equivalent to US$14.3bn or
2.3% of GDP). Government financing could represent 60% of total funding needs for the
NTP initiatives, with total NTP costs of SAR447bn (USS$119bn; 18.4% of GDP). Against
that, the NTP envisages raising SAR366bn in non-oil revenues and cut the wage bill by
5% or SAR24bn (USS$6.4bn or 1% of GDP). Non-oil revenue is seen rising to SAR530bn
(USS141bn, 23% of 2016f GDP) by 2020 from SAR163.5bn (7% of GDP).

Wage bill measure unclear but may carry profound social implications

In an unprecedented austerity measure, the share of the wage bill in total spending
would fall by 5ppt to 40% (SAR456bn, from SAR480bn) by 2020. It is yet unclear how
this could be achieved in practice. Furthermore, note that the MoF budget
announcement estimated the wage bill in 2015 to stand at SAR450bn, blurring the
target. Privatizations of government entities are likely to lead to a natural drop in the
public sector number of employees and wage bill. Yet we note that the Ministry of Civil
Service has two Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) directly linked to a decrease in the
payroll and benefits expenditure, and to a reduction in workers in the civil service sector.
This would likely be a contentious and unpopular measure to implement, and its
implementation and success appear challenging to us.

OS merrill Lynch GEMs Paper #26 | 30 June 2016 17

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016127
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013416.txt,"Local News: West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Martin & St. Lucie Counties | The Palm Beach Post 4/6/11 1:38 PM

| NEXT GENERATION PENNZOIL®
| : CLEANS OUT UP TO 40% OF
SLUDGE IN THE 1ST OIL CHANGE*

“Based on a severe sludge clean-up test using SAE 54-30.

Subscribe Now Renew

Local News Greater Palm Beaches and Treasure Coast

Palm Beach sex offender's secret plea deal:
Possible co-conspirators not charged, presses
victims to settle civil suits

By SUSAN SPENCER-WENDEL
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 18, 2009

WEST PALM BEACH — Billionaire financier sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's secret non-prosecution agreement he
struck with federal prosecutors was unsealed Friday, offering the first public look at the deal Epstein's high-powered
legal counsel brokered on his behalf.

According the agreement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office investigated Epstein
for various federal crimes, including prostitution, some punishable by a minimum of 10 years up to life in prison

But federal prosecutors backed down and agreed to recall grand jury subpoeanas, if Epstein pleaded guilty to
prostitution-related felonies in state court, which he ultimately did. He received an 18-month jail sentence, of which
he served 13.

A former federal prosecutor of 15 years, Mark Johnson of Stuart, said the disparity in the potential sentences was
unusual.

The United States Attorney's Office also agreed not to charge any of Epstein's possible co-conspirators - Sarah
Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff and Nadia Marcinkova.

The agreement was negotiated in part by New York heavyweight criminal defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt.

On its first draft in September 2007, it required that Epstein pay an attorney - tapped by the U.S. Attorney's Office
and approved by Epstein - to represent some of the victims in civil suits they had filed against Epstein. That
attorney is prominent Miami lawyer Bob Josefsberg.

Former prosecutor Johnson said he has never seen a provision like that before.

But an addendum to the agreement signed the following month struck Epstein's duty to pay Josefsberg if he and the
victims did not accept a settlement and instead pursued litigation.

The agreement, signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maria Villafana, does not expressly state whether any victims
were contacted or consulted before the deal was made.

Attorney Brad Edwards of Fort Lauderdale, who represents three of the young women, believes that none of the
between 30 and 40 woman identified as victims in the federal investigation were told of the deal. Edwards said his
clients were still receiving letters in the mail months afterwards saying the U.S. Attorney's Office assuring them
Epstein would be prosecuted.

""Never consulting the victims is probably the most outrageous aspect of it..."" Edwards said. ""It taught them that
someone with money can buy his way out of anything. It's outrageous and embarrassing for United States
Attorney's Office and the State Attorneys Office.”

Epstein now faces many civil lawsuits filed by the women, who are represented by a variety attorneys. In many, the
facts alleged are the same: that Epstein had a predilection for teenage girls, identified poor, vulnerable ones and
lured them to his home via other young women. The teens describe ascending a staircase lined with nude
photographs of young girls and to the spa room where Epstein would appear in a small towel.

Former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, who represents one of the victims, and The Palm Beach Post sought the
unsealing of the agreement. Berger refers to it as a ""sweetheart deal.”

""Why was itso important for the government to make this deal?"" Berger asked rhetorically. ""We have not yet had
honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made .. and why the victim's were sold down the river.”

Former federal prosecutor Ryon McCabe described the agreement as ""very unorthodox."" Such agreements, he said,
are usually reserved for corporations, not individuals.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbcwest/content/local_news/epaper/2009/09/18/0918epstein.html

|

® Site O Web Web Search by YAHOO!

Obama Launches Mortgage Relief Plan

lf you owe less than $729,000 on your _
mortgage, you probably qualify forthe _
President's Making Home Affordable
Program. With rates lower than they've ever
been, there has never been a better time to
refinance. If you are a homeowner and you
haven't looked into refinancing recently, you
may be surprised at how much you can save.

Select Your Age: :

Calculate New House Payment

COLUMNISTS AND BLOGGERS

FRANK CERABINO
5

Read Frank's latest columns
and follow him on Twitter.
Read more
«l

HOT CELEBRITY NEWS

Get the latest on South Florida
celebrities, billionaires,
politicos, more. Page2Live

GEORGE BENNETT

Read Post politics columnist
George Bennett's latest
articles. Read more

MOST POPULAR HEADLINES COMMENTS

Fatal shooting in Delray Beach draws crowd of 100
onlookers

Lake Worth mayor says The Cottage complaints use
‘gay card' against city manager

West Palm Beach mayor: Firefighter layoffs likely

Narcy Novack charged in 2009 Fort Lauderdale killing
of her mother-in-law

Boynton Police warn of new twist on ATM identity fraud

| _ | FOLLOW THE POST ON TWITTER
-_—

f txt | SIGN UP FOR MOBILE TEXT ALERTS

a The Palm Beach Post on Facebook
Like

16,985 people like The Palm Beach Post.

Page 1 of 3

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013416
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014379.txt,"multiples due to lagging EPS growth. For our P/TBV valuation, we apply a 1.2x tangible
book multiple to BANCs 2Q17E tangible book below peer multiples due to lagging ROTE.
For our DCF analysis, we forecast net income growth stabilizes at 3% in the terminal
stage. We also assume a beta of 1.1x in the terminal stage.

Downside risks to our price objective are slower than expected loan growth, and a
reduction in the common dividend.

Bank of Hawaii Corp. (BOH)

We use an equal weighted three-factor valuation framework (P/E, P/TBV, DCF) to arrive
at our $75 PO and assign a 2.2x multiple to 2Q17E TBV, representing a premium to
peers, which we believe is appropriate given a stronger profitability and capital profile.
Our 17x multiple on 2017E EPS is equal to the the peer median given average EPS
growth relative to peers. Our DCF assumes a two-stage cost of capital of 9.8% anda
terminal growth rate of 3%.

Downside risks to our price objective are a longer-than-anticipated low rate
environment and a reversal of local economic improvement. Upside risks are a stronger-
than-expected economic rebound, better-than-expected capital distribution and a
shorter-than-anticipated low rate environment.

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU)

To arrive at our $37 price objective, we have employed an equal-weighted three factor
valuation methodology that incorporates target P/TBV, P/E and DCF. We have applied a
target P/TBV value multiple of 1.5x on our 2Q17E TBV and a P/E target multiple of 16x
‘17 EPS, based on BKU's above average growth relative to peers. Our DCF assumes a
two-stage cost of capital of 7.9% and 9.3% and a terminal growth rate of 6%.

Downside risks to our price objective are slower CRE loan growth on the back of
regulatory oversight, as well as an inability to deploy excess capital, increased
competition for Florida M&A and an inability to continue to implement an organic
growth strategy in New York City.

BB&T Corporation (BBT)

We use a three-factor valuation framework (P/E, P/TBV, DCF) to arrive at our $45 PO
and assign a 1.6x multiple to 2017E TBV and 14.5x multiple on 2017E EPS. We have
weighted the P/E and P/TBV factors equally at 40%, and our DCF analysis by 20%.

Our EPS multiple is in-line with BBT’s historical avg, which reflects very high-growth
years in the 1990s, a pace unlikely to be achieved near term given BBT’s size as well as
the challenging macro backdrop and industry headwinds. Our DCF assumes a two-stage
cost of capital of 9.7% and 10.9% and a terminal growth rate of 4%.

Risks to our price objective are macro risks such as a double dip recession, the
implementation of a strict liquidity coverage ratio and further regulation on overdraft
income that restricts bank profitability. Specific to BBT, risks are enhanced regulatory
scrutiny and capital standards as a Domestic SIFI, the announcement of a large,
expensive deal, and the risk that the NPBC transaction does not consummate.

Capital Bank Financial Corp. (CBF)

Our $38 PO is based on an equal-weighted, two-factor valuation methodology that
assumes: We assumes a 20.0x P/ 2017e EPS and a target P/TBV of 1.6x to 2017E
tangible book given our forecast above peer EPS growth.

Downside risks to our PO are an inability to deploy excess capital and create value
through acquisitions.

Bankof America

Merrill Lynch 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 65

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014379
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026242.txt,"From: Thomas Jr., Landon 
Sent: 1/8/2018 3:04:23 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: You are in the book... 
Importance: High 
I read the first half of it last night -- there are a few paragraphs on you TB, DJT partying around NYC 
in 905 etc -- and then MW says you are airbrushed out of DJT history while Barrack sticks around. 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.h  
tml 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026242 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014730.txt,"This research report provides general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or
other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g, options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences). This report is not intended to provide

personal investment advice and it does not take into account the specific investment o!
ppropriateness of investing in financial instruments and
re prospects may not be realized. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for securities in any offering must be based solely on existing public information on such

financial advice regarding the a
that statements regarding futu
security or the in
Securities and ot
deposits or other obligations 0
among others, m
instruments may be difficult to
income from suc
lose their entire principal inves
Futures and options are not ap
disclosure documents. Investm
BofA Merrill Lyne!
action may be limited by regulations prohibiting or restricting ""shortse
executing any short idea con
This report may contain a trading idea or recommendation which
hat presents a transaction opportunity, but does not have any im
ideas and recommenda
Foreign currency rates of exc
effectively assume currency risk.
UK Readers: The protec
ocated outside of the U
LPF&S or one of its aff
ime, hold a trading posi
BofA Merrill Lynch, through business units other than Bo
with, and reach cifferen
methods of th
recipient of th

In the event tl

therew!

ith ML

Copyright an
Copyright 20

recommenda

information k

BofA

researe

hould
iny Bo
n pub

Ss
a

ove

his re

h repo
consu

ic info

rofessionals in other busi

Any in

The in

any af
submi

ormation herein (o
may contain links to t
contained on such
iliation with
ting any personal information to them. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsib
All opinions, project

errill Lynch Global Research and certain business groups. As a resul

ormation in the prospectus or other offering document issued in con
her financial instruments discussed in this report, or recommended, o
any insured depository institution (inc!
nterparty default risk and liquidity risk.
va
h securities and other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuate and
ment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to fu
propriate for all investors. Such financia
en

arket risk, cou

h is aware tha

ained in this report.

high
pact on the analyst's
lyst's ra
, price o|

ions may differ directionally from the ana

hange may adversely affect the value

ions
nited Kingdom. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Researc
iliates is a regular issuer of traded financial instru
tion (long or short) in the securities and financial

A Merril
conclusions from, the information presented in

@ persons who prepared them, and BofA Merrill Lynch is un
is report.

hat the recipient received this report pursuant to a contract

ments linked

port.

ncluding transactions in any securities mentioned in this re
d General Information regarding Research Reports:

nown to, professionals in other business areas of BofA Merri

t their o'

rmation. Facts and views presented in this material that rela

ness areas of BofA Merrill Lynch in connection with the legal

s affiliates or their research analysts has any au
icy prohibits rese
h rating, recommendation or investment thesis.

ating to the tax status of financial instruments discussed herein i
on their particular circumstances from an independent tax pro
her than disclosure information relating to BofA Merrill Ly

hird-
hird-party websi
BofA Merrill Lyne

es is not part of this report and is not incorpora

e
ions and estimates constitute the judgment of the author as of

re

d
a

uding, Bank of A
jo security, financial instrument or derivative is suitable for all investors. In some cases, securities and other financial
ue or sell and reliable information about the value or

strategies explained in this report may not be appro}

provided by the U.K. regulatory regime, including the Financial Services Scheme, do not apply in general to

instruments discussed in this report.

Lynch Global Research, may have issued and may in the future issue
his report. Such ideas or recommendations reflect the different time frames, assumptions, views and analytical
der no obligation to ensure that such other trading ideas or recommendations are brought to

between the recipient and MLPF&S for t
PF&S may be deemed to be acting as an investment adviser, such status relates, if at all, solely to the
beyond the delivery of this report (unless otherwise agreed specifically in
transactions, i

writing by MLPF&S). MLPF&S is and con

7 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. This research report is prepared for the use of Bo
disclosed, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch.
and client websites and other portals by BofA Merrill Lynch and are not pu
constitutes your agreement not to redistribute, retransmit, or disclose to others the con
ions, estimates or price targets) without first obtaining expressed permiss
Materials prepared by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research personnel are ba

blicly-available materials. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohi

sed on public i
I Lynch, includ
, BofA Merrill Lynch does not disclose certain client relationships witl
rts. To the extent this report discusses any legal proceeding or issues, it has not been prepared as nor is it intended to express any legal conclusion, opinion or advice. Investors
wn legal advisers as to issues of law relating to the subject matter of this report. BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research perso
A Merrill Lynch entity and/or its directors, officers and employees may be plaintif'
e to any such

act, circumstance or opinion contained in t
ating to securities, financial instruments and/or issuers that are no longer curren

r Extended Review. In each case, investors s
not rely on the analyses and investment opinion(s) pertaining to such issuer (or i
ion of any kind. Sales persons and financial advisors affiliated with MLPF&S or any of its affiliates may not

bjectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific
implementing investment strategies discussed or recommended in

nection with such offering, and not on this report.
fered or sold by Merrill Lynch, are not insured by the Federal Deposi
merica, N.A.). Investments in general and, derivatives, in particular, in

risks related to the security or financial instrument may be difficult

person. Investors should seek
this report and should understand

Insurance Corporation and are not
volve numerous risks, including,

‘0 obtain. Investors should note that

hat price or value of such securities and instruments may rise or fal
ure performance. Levels and basis for taxation may change.

particular “Overweight” or “Underweight” rating

to securities that may have been recommended

inues to ac

‘A Merrill Lynch clients and may not be re
BofA Merrill Lynch research reports are d
bited. Receip
ents, opinions, conclusion, or information contained in this report
ion from an authorized officer of BofA Merrill Lynch.

nformation. Facts and views presented in this material
ing investment banking personnel. BofA Merrill Lynch

have not be

nnel’s know

proceedings have not been reviewed by, discussed with, and mayn
proceedings or matters relevant to such proceedings.

port has been prepared independently of any issuer of securities mentioned herein and not in connection with any proposed offering of securities or as agent of
ities. None of MLPF&S, any of i
Research po
containing suc
ormation re
seek tax advice based

hority whatsoever to make any representation or warranty on behalf of the issuer(s}. Bo
arch personnel from disclosing a recommendation, investment rating, or investment thesis for review by an issuer prior to the pub

s not intended to provide tax advice or to be used by anyone to provide tax advi
essional.
nch and its affiliates) was obtained from various sources and we do not guaran
party websites. BofA Merrill Lynch is not responsible for the content of any third-party website or any linked content contained in a third-
ed by reference into this report. The inc
h. Access to any third-party website is at your own risk, and you should always review the terms and privacy policies at third-par'
or such terms and privacy policies and expressly disclaims any liability for them.
he date of the report and are subject toc
notice. BofA Merrill Lynch is under no obligation to update this report and BofA Merrill Lynch's ability to publish research ont
periods. You should therefore assume that BofA Merrill Lynch will not update any
Certain outstanding reports may contain discussions and/or investment opinions
recent research report relating to an issuer prior to making an investment decision.
nsome cases, an issuer may be classified as Restricted or may be Under Review o
its security and/or financial instruments} to be suspended or withdrawn and shou
inancial instruments) nor should the analyses or opinion(s) be considered a solici
solicit purchases of securities or financial instruments that are Restricted or Under Review and may only solicit securities under Extended Review in accordance with
either BofA Merrill Lynch nor any officer or employee of BofA Merrill Lynch accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential damages or losses arising from any use of
his report or its contents.

hange without notice. Prices a
he subject issuer(s) in the futu
his report.

hould consider any investmen

this report. Investors in such sec!
business coordinated by BofA

h policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.
in this report. MLPF&S or one o

usion of a link in this report does not imply any

and, in some cases, investors may

instruments may expire worthless. Before investing in futures or options, clients must receive the appropriate risk

priate at all times. Costs of such strategies do not include commission or margin expenses.

the implementation of the ideas expressed in this report may depend upon an investor's ability to ""short"" securities or other financial instruments and that such
ling"" in many jurisdictions. Investors are urged to seek advice regarding the applicability of such regulations prior to

ights a specific identified near-term catalyst or event impacting a security, issuer, industry sector or the market generally

which is based on a three month trade horizon). Trading
ing ona security or issuer because they reflect the impact of a near-term catalyst or event.
r Income of any security or financial instrument mentioned in

urities and instruments
errill Lynch entities

its affiliates may, at any

rading ideas or recommendations that are inconsistent

he attention of any

he provision of research services for a separate fee, and in connection
person with whom MLPF&S has contracted directly and does not extend
solely as a broker-dealer in connection with tl

he execution of any

distributed, retransmitted or
istributed simultaneously to internal
t and review of this research report

(including any investment

en reviewed by, and may not reflect

has established information barriers between
h, or compensation received

rom, such issuers in

ledge of legal proceedings in which

s, defendants, co-defendants or co-plaintiffs with or involving issuers mentioned in this report is based

ot reflect information known to,
any issuer of any

A Merrill Lynch
ication of a research
ce. Investors are urged to
cal
part

ts accuracy. This report
y website. Content
endorsement by or
es before

y websi

Iso are su
re is subj

bject to change without
ect to applicable quiet

. Always refer to the most

t opinion relating to such issuer (or

5 securities and/or

irm policies.

10

Cause and Effect | 13 February 2017

HOUS

BankofAmerica <2”
Merrill Lynch

E_OVERSIGHT_014730
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023122.txt,"Filming
Venues
Transportation
Fees

Rough Budget:

$100K/episode
$50K/episode
$15K/episode
$100K/episode

TOTAL Production Cost

$1.2 Million
$0.6 Million
$0.18 Million
$1.2 Million

$3.18 Million

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023122
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025270.txt,"Bonds overview

Government bonds - Key points

¢ We expected government bond yields to move towards slightly higher ranges over the next 6 months,
as seen in late 201 1/early 2012. This is likely to have a slightly negative effect on most developed
government bond prices, and is likely to result in a total return around zero over this period.

¢ Price fluctuations in the month ahead could originate from developments in the Eurozone and the US.
They include the Troika report on Greece, Spanish local elections/referendum and the possible delayed
request for additional ECB support in Europe. In the US, the extent of the fiscal cliff is dependent on the
election outcome and the results from the debates in the subsequent lame duck session of congress.
While we expect the full cliff to be avoided, it poses a significant downside risk to domestic growth.

* Overall, we suggest keeping the duration close to neutral, as we expect global growth to remain
lackluster and central banks to continue supporting bond markets.

Corporate and emerging market bonds - Key points

¢ We maintain a preference for investment-grade (IG) and US high-yield (HY) corporate credit. A strong
(US) corporate sector, the ongoing moderate recovery of the US economy, determined central bank
support and a strong technical backdrop are likely to further support credit segments.

e Investment-grade corporate bonds have achieved a total return of more than 10% so far this year, at
remarkably low volatility. While absolute returns will likely be moderate in the next six months (1-2%),
the asset class should continue outperforming government bonds, offering higher liquidity than HY
bonds. We see the highest return potential in the lower-rated IG segments (BBB and A).

e US corporate bonds of lower credit quality (HY) remain fundamentally supported by solid balance
sheets and a benign US growth outlook. Given the low risk of default losses, valuations are attractive at
an effective yield of above 6%. For US HY, we expect mid single-digit total returns in the next six months.
US senior loans are an attractive alternative to traditional fixed income assets.

e Emerging market (EM) bonds should continue to benefit from better fundamentals than those of
developed markets over the medium term. However, valuations have now moved towards a fair level for
sovereign bonds (in USD) and we take profits on selected sovereign bond issuers. For EM corporate bonds
in USD, there is still some potential for spreads to trend lower in the quarters ahead, and we continue to
recommend this area as a ClO-preferred theme.

2 UBS

Preferences (6 months)

short duration

USD

EUR (DE)

GBP

JPY

CHF

CAD

AUD

Bonds total

Bnew

underweight

neutral

old

neutral

long duration

overweight

Government C1

bonds

Investment
grade
corporate
bonds

High yield
bonds

Emerging
market
bonds

Bnew

old

Source: UBS CIO WM Global Investment Office

23
For further information please contact ClO's asset class specialists Achim Peijan, achim.peijan@ubs.com and Daniela Steinbrink Mattei, daniela.steinbrinkmattei@ubs.com

Please see important disclaimer and disclosures at the end of the document.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025270
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017759.txt,"Page 45 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *911

would cover such situations by allowing victims who are present at a hearing to be heard on issues ""directly"" affecting their
rights.

[#912]

Rule 44.1 - Discretionary Appointment of Counsel for Victim

The Proposal:

The court's discretionary authority to appoint counsel for a victim should be included in a new rule as follows:
Rule 44.1 Counsel for Victims.

When the interests of justice require, the court may appoint counsel for a victim to assist the victim in exercising his or her
rights.

The Rationale:

An argument could be made that the CVRA guarantees crime victims the right to appointed counsel. After all, the CVRA
guarantees victims the right to be ""treated with fairness"" and fairness can be understood as embracing the assistance of counsel.
309 But on closer examination, it becomes clear that nothing in the CVRA directly mandates counsel for victims. As Senator
Kyl explained, ""This bill does not provide victims with a right to counsel but recognizes that a victim may enlist counsel on
their own."" 310

While the CVRA does not require judges to appomt counsel for victims, nothing in it prevents judges from doing so in
appropriate cases, particularly under prevailing case law demonstrating that federal courts have inherent authority to make such
appointments. Because this authority may not be well known to judges (or to victims), the authority should be clearly laid out
in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

A number of federal courts have recognized inherent judicial authority to appoint lawyers for indigent litigants in both civil and
criminal cases. 3!! While these cases do not directly involve [*913] appointment of counsel for crime victims, their principles

309 Cf. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344 (1963) (discussing ""fairness"" to the defendant as a reason for recognizing a right to
appointed counsel).

310 150 Cong. Rec. S4268 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl).

311 See, e.g., Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (holding, in a capital case, that courts have the power to appoint counsel and that
""attorneys are officers of the court, and are bound to render service when required by such an appointment""); United States v. Bertoli, 994
F.2d 1002, 1015-18 (3d Cir. 1993) (holding that the court has inherent power to order defendant's retained law firm to remain as standby
counsel at a criminal trial when defendant elects to represent himself pro se); United States v. Accetturo, 842 F.2d 1408, 1412-16 (3d Cir.
1988) (holding that courts have inherent power to appoint counsel during a criminal trial proceeding but that the power does not extend to
appointing lawyers licensed in other states); United States v. Bowe, 698 F.2d 560, 566-67 (2d Cir. 1983) (noting that a court has inherent
authority to appoint counsel for an indigent witness who may incriminate herself during testimony in a criminal case); Williamson _v.
Vardeman, 674 F.2d 121], 1212-16 (8th Cir. 1982) (upholding a state court judge's appointment of pro bono counsel in criminal case as
constitutional although noting that forcing an attorney to advance his own funds may be unconstitutional); 7vler v. Lark, 472 F.2d 1077, 1079
(8th Cir. 1973) (noting that in civil rights cases, ""representation of indigents upon court order has been a traditional obligation of the lawyer
which he assumes when he becomes a member of the bar""); Dolan v. United States, 351 F.2d 671, 672 (5th Cir. 1965) (holding, in a criminal
case, that lawyers implicitly consent to be appointed by courts pro bono when accepting a license to practice law); United States v. Dillon,
346 F.2d 633, 635-36 (9th Cir. 1965) (holding, in a criminal case, that there is ""an obligation on the part of the legal profession to represent
indigents upon court order, without compensation""). But cf. Colbert v. Rickmon, 747 F. Supp. 518, 527 (W.D. Ark. 1990) (holding that courts
have no inherent power to order attorneys to represent indigent clients). See generally Jerry L. Anderson, Court-Appointed Counsel: The
Constitutionality of Uncompensated Conscription, 3 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 503 (1989) (discussing the trend against requiring lawyers to take
uncompensated court appointments); Bruce Andrew Green, Court Appointment of Attorneys in Civil Cases: The Constitutionality of
Uncompensated Legal Assistance, 81 Colum. L. Rev. 366 (1981) (discussing the constitutionality of pro bono court appointments); Judy E.

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017759
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027990.txt,"Youssef’s apartment, the one Mookie and Yoni had been assigned. Then, bursts
of gunfire from the other building.

A Land Rover was approaching from the gendarmerie at the bottom of the
road. We waited until it was about 50 feet away. Amiram and I opened fire, then
Dov and Shmuel Katz as well. The driver lost control and crashed into the side
of the Renault. There were at least four policemen inside. They, too, rolled
behind the wall on the far side of the street. Using the terrace columns for cover,
we kept shooting. Within a minute or so, only a couple of the cops fired back.

Though the three Palestinians could not know the reason for the gunfire and
the wailing of the car horn, they were now on their guard. When Mookie had
blown open the door to Abu Youssef’s flat — and he, Yoni and the other two
members of his team ran into the apartment — he saw the Black September man
peering out from the bedroom. Mookie raised his Uzi but the Palestinian ducked
inside and shut the door. All four of them fired through through the door. When
they went in, they found not only Abu Youssef but his wife, both dead. When
Zvika’s team burst in on Kamal Nasser, he, too, was ready. Crouching behind a
desk, he raised an automatic pistol and fired, grazing one of the team on the leg.
But in a burst of Uzi bullets, he, too, was killed.

I suspect that Amitai’s face-to-face meeting with Dado may have saved his
life. When he and his team cornered Kamal Adwan, he had an AK-47 raised and
ready to fire. Without even a split second’s unconscious hesitation, Amitai fired
first. His only regret afterwards was that Adwan’s wife and children saw it
happen, and that when they’d blasted open the apartment door, the force blew
open the door of a nearby flat, killing an elderly Italian woman. She had been
one of the Mossad’s sources of information on the Beirut apartments.

Mookie’s team came down first. They joined us, crouching behind the
columns, as sporadic shots continued from one of the policemen behind the wall
across the street. When a second police Land Rover approached, | at first
signaled the others to let it pass. But when it suddenly accelerated toward us, we
opened fire. It swerved, crashing into the rear bumper of the other one.

The other teams were back down now. I shouted for Dov to have the drivers
bring the station wagons from around the corner. When we began to pull away,
a third police Land Rover appeared. It sped up behind us. Mookie tossed back a
grenade. The last thing I saw as we made it to the end of the block and headed
toward the seafront was the front end of the vehicle exploding. We dropped
hollow, needle-sharp spikes out the window of the car as we left, so I knew that

142
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027990
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023644.txt,"The text of the television interview of the Deputy Crown Prince: Prince Mohammed bin
Salman:

The Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz, the Deputy Crown Prince, the Second Deputy of the
Prime Minister, and the Chairman of the Council for Economic Affairs and Development, has held a
television interview on Saudi Arabia's first channel for the most important local and regional issues, and
he stated the followings:

* The national transformation program was designed to improve the performance of government
agencies?

- That’s true, and for this reason there are indicators and targets have entered in 24 government
agencies, the second batch will be launched in the near future or the coming weeks, and there are new
entities, that were not included in the 24 parties in the national transformation program, will be added
to it.

* Now it is been a year since the establishment of 2030 vision, How do your Highness see its impact on
the growth, the unemployment and non-oil income?

- | think that it has achieved so many achievements. If we look at 50 thousand feet, we will find that the
deficit rate is less than all analysts’ anticipation, both at home and abroad for 2015 and 2016. And also
for the budget of 2017 we will find non-oil revenues almost doubled in these years, ""the last two years
from nearly 111 billion to nearly 200 billion Saudi riyals. We will also look at the fact that budget control
has become much more accurate than a budget in the last year, which spends more than 25 % to 45 % to
a budget where only less than 10 % is spent. All of which are more than 50,000 feet. In addition to that,
the main economic indexes have been affected by eighties, the nineties, and 2009 fall in oil prices such
as the unemployment index which increased in those sharp declines, while the inflation index rose very
significantly. The investment index also fell very strongly, while in this crisis the oil prices fell very
sharply in an unprecedented manner in the history of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and in a very rapid
pace until it reached 27 dollars in a short period, and continued at this abysmal level for a year and more
than a year. But, thanks to God, thanks to the guidance of his majesty the king, and the work of
government agencies and officials and government employees who were able to maintain a lot of
indexes without being affected negatively. Unemployment was maintained at its level and was not
strongly affected negatively. Inflation was also not strongly affected negativly as the historical cases we
have seen in the past. The investment index was not affected strongly and the growth index continued
to rise on the GDB. It is true that it is below the global average but we have not entered a stage of
contraction in the Saudi economy. Now the effects of these programs that will be launched will start to
appear in late 2017. We will find their very strong impact starting from 2018 and 2019 on all these key
economic indexes.

* Your Highness, Prince, with regard to the issue of unemployment from the beginning of this year and
with the recession that the local market suffered, there was a layoff for people from their jobs, what is
the plan for that?

- As everyone knows, that any reform process and any screening process of the country will be
accompanied by side effects. It is very normal with the oil drop to $ 27 and its continuation for a long
time less than S 40 have a lot of symptoms affecting the state spending. These ten programs are all in

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023644
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025516.txt,"with Richard Dawkins on Frost, evolution and probability and with Jay Parini, Frost biographer, in Frost’s
cabin on “The Road not Taken”.

with Director of the College Board (and writer of the Common Core Standards) , David Coleman on Robert
Frost’s “Birches” (filmed in a birch grove)

with Peter Galison on Einstein and Modernism (taped in the Harvard Scientific Instruments collection in the
Harvard Science Center) and with author Walter Isaacson on Einstein and Modernism (Fogg Museum)

with Ray Dalio on Marianne Moore( in Rajah Ampat with Conservation International); and with Jane
Pickering, Head of the Harvard Natural History Museum, ( filmed in the Harvard Museum of Natural History)

with Stefan Weiss, Walt Mossberg and David Malan on coding, computer language and L-A-N-G-U-A-G-E
poetry

Elisa New

Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature
Harvard University

148 Barker Center

12 Quincy Street

Cambridge, MA

02138

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025516
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015348.txt,"“Lesbians hook up with gay men all the time,” he says, “either
friends or guys they’ ve met through personal ads. We are now simply
allowing them to do so safely and without discrimination.”

On the other hand, in the movie, Sarah Si/verman: Jesus ls Magic--a
performance by one of the best and raunchiest female stand-up
comedians--she describes a sure method of birth control: “coming all
over her face.” Of course, that punchline is derived from the ever popular
image on Internet porn sites, where | look in vain for the small print with
messages warning, “Do Not Try This Particular Money Shot At Home”
and “This ls Not Exactly What She Means When She Says She’ d Like To
Get a Facial For Her Birthday.”

Furthermore, in Chelsea, Michigan, Book Crafters has refused to
print Baboon Dooley, Rock Critic, a collection of John Crawford’ s comic
strip, because his protagonist accidentally drinks from a glass of semen. He
spits it out upon learning the content, only to be called a sexist, and
challenged: “You' d expect a woman to drink it, right?” However, on
CNN, author Hugh Prather was a guest, and the subject was couples. A
caller revealed his problem: “The trouble is, when | come in her mouth,
she can’ t really swallow it all."" The anchor quickly hung up on this

premature ejaculation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015348
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020704.txt,"Image source: yuyamika7

#7 Audrey Hepburn

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020704
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017981.txt,"EXHIBIT 2

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017981
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031490.txt,"advances toward a married woman, and aggressively kissing and groping other
women.

The remarkable recording, unearthed by The Washington Post on Friday, was made
in 2005 on the set of a soap opera where Mr. Trump was making a cameo
appearance. Mr. Trump was captured on an open microphone that he apparently did
not know was recording his conversation with Billy Bush, then the host of “Access
Hollywood,” with whom he was sitting on a bus.

Read more »

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW NYTimes FACEBOOK [WN @NYTimes

Get unlimited access to NYTimes.com and our

Sal ete NTT s- COniaie wale (heres = NYTimes apps for just $0.99. Subscribe »

ABOUT THIS EMAIL
You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Breaking News Alerts newsletter.
Unsubscribe Manage Subscriptions Change Your Email Privacy Policy Contact Advertise

Copyright 2015 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031490
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027748.txt,"Message: <Unsupported Message Content>

Time: 05/26/19 07:43:00 AM (580574580)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

zh
eg

GUID: C4F52F1D-5D17-423E-9239-29FEE8 987724

Message: Gods country

Time: 05/26/19 01:31:47 PM (580595507)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: DSFA2715-68DB-4840-9A72-FB3F308C0765

Message: We r rolling

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/26/19 01:32:54 PM (580595574)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F23C1BF1-3AB4-43B9-AE5B-8EF809F58DA5

Message:

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/26/19 02:48:45 PM (580600125)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: D8B3742C-836D-41BB-8A78-31A2AC341DE7

Gl

Message: Im told nationalists will have more space but no much more influence ?

Time: 05/26/19 02:50:10 PM (580600210)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No

GUID: 3CDF700C-COA0-4ABC-AE5C-17BEF5BD8D5D

Message: Th stablish order always digs in

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027748
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030956.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 5/5/2018 5:46:34 AM

To: Steve Bannon

Subject: Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times
Good catch and yes

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:09 PM Steve Bannon <Q wrote:

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/politics/trump-hush-payment-stormy-
daniels.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030956
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024608.txt,"17

and regain its full rights."" Egypt's new government has made tentative
steps in that direction: Members of the Supreme Council of the
Armed Forces, accompanied by the deputy interior minister and
members of the military intelligence, held a meeting on Aug. 20 in
the el-Arish military club, in a conference hall with Bedouin sheikhs
representing each tribe in Sinai. At the meeting speakers from both
sides expressed their willingness to cooperate in bringing the security
situation back to normal and to bury the hatchet ""for love of Sinai.""
The government officials announced their concessions, including
promises to soon issue a new law regarding land ownership in the
region and to revisit the files of those Bedouins sentenced in absentia;
the Bedouins dutifully clapped at the news. Several Bedouin sheikhs
subsequently took to the podium and announced their intentions to
assist in securing the region.

The government's planned reforms are a good start, but after years of
neglect, it's going to take more than promises to win over the
Bedouins. If Egypt is truly concerned about securing Sinai, it must
quickly turn its words into actions.

Mohamed Fadel Fahmy is the author of Baghdad Bound and works
as a freelance news producer/journalist for CNN in Cairo.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024608
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029696.txt,"a Surprisingly strong showing by a new
centrist party is likely to put more
pressure on him to pursue talks.

“It was a mistake for Obama not to go in
the first term at a time when it could have
affected Israeli public opinion of him,
and now, it has hardened against him to a
point that I don’t believe it can,” said
Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow at the
Council on Foreign Relations who served
as a senior Middle East adviser to Bush.

Obama’s visit will coincide with growing
concern in the region that the two-state
solution favored by him is in peril, as
Israeli settlement construction continues
and as the Islamist Hamas gains clout
within the once-secular Palestinian
nationalist movement. Hamas emerged
stronger politically from the recent clash
with Israel and continues to reject the
Jewish state’s right to exist.

Hamas and its secular rival Fatah are due
to meet Saturday as part of a
reconciliation process. If an agreement is
reached and Hamas joins the Palestinian
Authority, Obama will be faced with an
awkward decision on whether to meet
with a government that includes members
ofa U.S.-

designated terrorist movement.

As he begins again in the region, Obama
will be advised by new Secretary of State
John F. Kerry. He has also named former

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029696
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011907.txt,"From: Nicholas Ribis

Sent: 5/7/2019 1:53:22 PM
To: 'J' [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: RE:

Importance: — High
More bad news for our friend

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 12:29 AM
To: Nicholas Ribis

Subject:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/06/us/politics/trump-inauguration-stephanie-winston-

wolkoff.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011907
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022113.txt,"James PATTERSON

Over tea in his town house, she noticed, Epstein ate all the
finger food that had been put out for both of them. She found it

odd that the only book this supposedly brilliant man had left for

her to see was a paperback by the Marquis de Sade. And then

there was the call afterward from one of Epstein’s assistants — a
woman Ward did not know —who told her, “Jeffrey wanted me
to tell you that you looked so pretty.”

Ward is pretty, with fine English features and flowing blond

hair. She was also very pregnant then, with a bad case of morn-

ing sickness. She threw up often, sometimes in public, and these
clumsy advances on Epstein’s part only added to her ever-present
nausea. For a man who was supposedly brilliant, he'd struck her,

oddly, as not very smart.
“Epstein is charming, but he doesn’t let the charm slip into

his eyes,” she wrote. “They are steely and calculating, giving
some hint at the steady whir of machinery running behind them.
‘Let’s play chess, he said to me, after refusing to give an inter-

view for this article. ‘You be white. You get the first move.’ It was
an appropriate metaphor for a man who seems to feel he can win
no matter what the advantage of the other side. His advantage 1s
that no one really seems to know him or his history completely
or what his arsenal actually consists of. He has carefully engi-

neered it so that he remains one of the few truly baffling mystet

ies among New York's moneyed world. People know snippets, =

but few know the whole.”

The testimonials Epstein’s friends gave were glowing: 14

think we both possess the skill of seeing patterns,” Les Wexner

told her. “Jeffrey sees patterns in politics and financial markets,
ds. My skills are ©

and I see patterns in lifestyle and fashion tren

146

not in investment strateg
knows, his are not in fast
world trends as each of us
“Tm on my 20th boc
Epstein in 1997, “The onl
ily that I send drafts to is
But Ward also talked
questions and qualms ab«
in lawsuits against him. C
with him. One who had
board of Rockefeller Uniy
One powerful investn
conspicuous absence frot
ing desks don’t seem to
animals that big to not le:
Ward uncovered lega
view with the SEC, given
Stearns. She visited a fed:
at length with Steven Ho
made a major mistake in
told him to stay below the
accusations, about Epste
denied—and Ward kne

7 mastermind, was not to b
_ throughout the reporting

- concerned with what sh

with what she’d uncovere

Time and again, he '

i
have on the girls?”

,
Bt .

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022113
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032199.txt,"29

though repressive of political rights, have adhered to his grand
strategy of seeking natural resources anywhere in the world, wherever
they can find them, caring not with which despots they do business,
in order to continue to raise the economic status of their own people.
These Chinese autocrats govern in a collegial fashion, number many
an engineer and technocrat among them, and observe strict retirement
ages: this is all a far cry from the king of Saudi Arabia and the
deposed leader of Egypt, sleepy octogenarians both, whose skills for
creating modern middle-class societies are for the most part
nonexistent.

Park Chung Hee, in the 1960s and 1970s, literally built,
institutionalized and industrialized the South Korean state. It was
Park Chung Hee’s benign authoritarianism, as much as the
democracy that eventually followed him, that accounts for the
political-economic powerhouse that is today’s South Korea.

Then, of course, there is the founder of current-day Singapore, Lee
Kuan Yew. In 1959, Lee became prime minister of what was then a
British colony. He retired from that post over thirty years later
(though he continued to exert significant power until very recently).
As the British prepared to withdraw in the 1960s, Lee attached
Singapore to Malaya, helping to form Malaysia as a bulwark against
Indonesian expansionism. When racial tensions between ethnic
Malays in the Malay Peninsula and ethnic Chinese in Singapore
made the new federation unworkable, Lee seceded and the
independent city-state of Singapore was born. When Lee assumed
power, Singapore was literally a third-world malarial hellhole beset
by ethnic tensions and communist tendencies; it was barely a country
in any psychological sense and it certainly could not defend itself
against powerful neighbors. Lee turned it into a first-world
technological dynamo and transportation hub, with one of the highest
living standards worldwide, and with a military that is among the best

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032199
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013370.txt,"IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case No.: 50 2009CA 040800XXX XMBAG

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
VS. :

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

Defendants,
/

DEFENDANT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS’S
RENEWED MOTION FOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., by and through his undersigned counsel and
pursuant to Rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves for Final Summary
J udgment and in support thereof states as follows:

I. INTRODUCTION

The pleadings and discovery taken to date show that there is no genuine issue as to any
material facts and that Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. is entitled to summary judgment for all claims
brondhe against him in Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein’s Second Amended Complaint. Not only is there
an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Edwards participated in any fraud against
Epstein, the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of Edwards’
involvement in the prosecution of legitimate claims against Epstein. Epstein sexually abused

three clients of Edwards — L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe — and Edwards properly and successfully

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013370
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032931.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 11/20/2016 11:00:34 PM 
To: Lesley Groff 
Subject: Fwd: 
Forwarded message 
From: Ken Starr <__________________ 
Date: Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 6:54 PM 
Subject: Re: 
To: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Jeffrey, sensational! I'll be there with bells ringing. High noon ok? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 20, 2016, at 12:53 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
great great anytime at your convenience or you can come to the house, 
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Ken Starr wrote: 
Fabulous! May I buy you lunch? 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:32 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I'll be there wed 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM Ken Starr < wrote: 
And to you as well. We'll be at the Breakers en famine as of Tuesday evening.. Any chance to see you in 
the Sunshine State? 
Hugs, Ken 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:48 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Ken Starr wrote: 
Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board. 
Hope you're well. Best, Ken 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise? 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Ken Starr__________________________________wrote: 
Darn. On a cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election 
cruise. Bad timing on our part. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032931 
We'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there. 
Many thanks. 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , i can organize. anytime with wife your 
call. otherwise new york dec. 6-9? \ 
interesting times. http ://www. dailymail. co .uk/news/article-3914012/Troub led-woman-history-drug-
use-claime d-ass aulted-D onald- Trump -Jeffrey-Ep stein-sex -p arty-age-13 -FABRICATED-story. html  
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Ken Starr wrote: 
Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
any new york plans 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032932 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032933 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032934 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028588.txt,"JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028588
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029682.txt,"On Jan 9, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote:

how is it shaping up? what are the biggest hurdles.

Oe ee oe ee ee eo ee 2 ae ae ee a oe ee ee ee eR ee eR RR OR KK

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Oe ee OR ee ee eo ee oe ee ee eo ie ee ak ee eo ee eo ee ie Oo oo ee KR OR OR KK

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

He ee OR ae ae ee oe ee oe ae ee a ee ee ee eR ee RR KR RK KK

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029682
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029603.txt,"HARVARD UNIVERSITY 
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH 
Barker Center - 12 Quincy Street - Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 
ELISA NEW 
Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature 
November 25, 2018 
Dear Ms. Williams: 
Tel: 
Fax: 
I am writing now to invite you to be a featured guest of Poetry in America 
(poetryinamerica.org). Poetry in America's first season's guests included Bill 
Clinton, Joe Biden, Cynthia Nixon, Shaquille O'Neal, Yo Yo Ma, Samantha 
Power, Herbie Hancock, John McCain, Nas, Angela Duckworth, Bono, Regina 
Spektor, Frank Gehry, Stuart Weitzman, E.O. Wilson and many others. Seasons 
Two and Three will feature just as distinguished a line up. The series airs on 
public television stations everywhere, streams via Amazon Prime and other 
streaming services, and it is now also airing on a variety of domestic and 
international airlines. 
The poem we'd read and interpret together is by Pulitzer Prize winner, Sharon 
Olds, and it's called ""The Language of the Brag."" It's a gutsy poem that 
compares feats of (male) athletic prowess-- and feats of poetic prowess-- to 
childbirth. You are the ideal reader for this poem. We would use what we 
filmed together in upcoming season of Poetry in America. I'll also use the 
content in an online course for medical professionals I am creating in 
partnership with Harvard Medical School. 
I thank you for considering this request. I would be very honored to work 
with you. 
Sincerely, 
Elisa New 
Director and Host of Poetry in America 
Powell M. Cabot Professor, Harvard 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029603 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011913.txt,"3. Jurisdiction is proper in the Circuit Court as this action seeks relief in excess of fifteen-
thousand dollars ($15,000).

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AS TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN
4. Plaintiff Jean-Luc Brunel is the owner of Plaintiff modeling agency known as “MC2
Model & Talent Miami” (‘MC2”). MC2 began operations in October 2005 and has offices in
New York, Miami, and Tel Aviv.
5. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (“Epstein”) is a hedge-fund manager with a residence in Palm
Beach County, Florida. Defendant has been the subject of significant media coverage due to

charges brought against him involving sexual contact with minors. (Composite Exhibit A

attached).

6. Plaintiff Brunel and Epstein have known one another since the inception of Plaintiff
MC2.

Ts Plaintiff Brunel operated his modeling agency, Plaintiff MC2, without incident until

Epstein was first charged in Palm Beach County with unlawful sexual contact with a minor in
2006. He was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor and sentenced to eighteen

months in prison, of which he served thirteen months. He remains a registered sex offender in
Florida as of this day.

8. First, after the initial criminal charges against Epstein were filed in Palm Beach County,
Plaintiffs were widely implicated in the media as being “linked” to Epstein. These false stories
caused both Plaintiffs a tremendous loss of business.

a. Plaintiffs lost multiple contacts and business in the modeling business as a direct result of

Epstein’s illegal actions. For example, several photographers will not work with MC2 due to the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011913
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017935.txt,"﻿Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 28
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO:
v.
ALAN DERSHOWITZ,
Defendant.
________________________ /
COMPLAINT
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 28
Plaintiff, VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, formerly known as Virginia Roberts (“Roberts”), for
her Complaint against Defendant, Alan Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”) avers upon personal
knowledge as to her own acts and status and upon information and belief and to all other matters:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This suit arises out of Defendant’s defamatory statements of and concerning
Plaintiff.
2. During 2000-2002, beginning when Plaintiff was 16, Plaintiff was the victim of
sex trafficking and abuse by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
3. Epstein’s trafficking scheme involved recruiting young girls, often by claiming
they would be paid $200 for simply providing a massage to a wealthy billionaire. The young girl
would then be brought up to Epstein’s bedroom where Epstein would be on a massage table;
Epstein would then sexually abuse the girl. This same pattern was repeated numerous times with
numerous children.
4. “From between 1999 – 2007, Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor
girls…in his mansion in Palm Beach Florida, and elsewhere in the United States and overseas…
In addition to his own sexual abuse of the victims, Epstein directed other persons to abuse the
girls sexually. Epstein used paid employees to find and bring minor girls to him. Epstein
worked in concert with others to obtain minors not only for his sexual gratification, but also for
the sexual gratification of others.” United States District Court Judge Marra February 21, 2016
Summary Judgement Order at 2, Case No.: 9:08-cv-80786 (internal citations omitted). One of
the persons with whom Epstein acted in concert was Dershowitz.
5. Like other minor children who came before and after her, Plaintiff was initially
recruited to provide massages, and thereafter to engage in a variety of sexual acts, for Epstein.
2
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 28
Plaintiff was required to be on call for Epstein for sexual purposes and frequently traveled with
him both nationally and internationally. Plaintiff was regularly abused by Epstein and was lent
out by Epstein to others for sexual purposes.
6. Defendant Dershowitz was Epstein’s attorney, close friend, and co-conspirator.
Dershowitz was also a participant in sex trafficking, including as one of the men to whom
Epstein lent out Plaintiff for sex.
7. When Epstein was arrested for sex trafficking in 2006, Dershowitz defended his
friend and client by falsely attacking the veracity of his accusers, including calling the children
whom Epstein had abused (and, in the case of Plaintiff, the Defendant himself had also abused),
liars and prostitutes.
8. Despite his significant criminal activity, Epstein’s criminal charges were resolved
by a guilty plea to a single Florida state law charge and a non-prosecution agreement (a “NPA”)
with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Unknown to the public and the
victims at the time, Epstein’s lawyers, including Dershowitz, were pressuring the Government to
commit to the NPA without informing the victims. Epstein’s multiple victims, including
Roberts, were kept in the dark and told to be “patient” while Dershowitz participated in the
drafting of the NPA and worked to protect Epstein and other “potential co-conspirators”
(including himself) from prosecution.
9. On July 7, 2008, a challenge to the NPA was brought on behalf of two of
Epstein’s victims (not including Plaintiff) based on the fact that, contrary to the requirements of
the Criminal Victims’ Rights Act (the “CVRA”), the NPA had been concealed from Epstein’s
victims.
3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 28
10. In December 2014, Roberts, who had not initially been part of the CVRA action,
was asked to, and did, provide information to Plaintiffs’ counsel in the CVRA case in which she
discussed her sex trafficking by Epstein. On December 31, 2014, Plaintiff’s counsel in the
CVRA proceeding (Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell) filed a Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for
Joinder in the Action (“Joinder Motion”) on behalf of Roberts. Ms. Roberts’s joinder motion
described how she had been sexually trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and was forced to have sex
with, among others, Alan Dershowitz.
11. Based on Plaintiff’s December 2014 filing, Dershowitz, as he had previously done
to Epstein’s victims, publically and viciously attacked plaintiff’s counsel in the CVRA actions,
Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. Dershowitz, in nationally televised news interviews, wrongfully
claimed that Edwards and Cassell had engaged in unethical behavior warranting disbarment for
filing the Joinder Motion that described Dershowitz’s involvement with Epstein and Roberts.
Edwards, who is a prominent attorney for sexually abused women and children, and Cassell who
is a former United States District Court judge who left the bench to advocate for criminal
victims, sued Dershowitz for defamation. Edwards and Cassell asserted that the factual
allegations that Dershowitz had knowledge of and participated in Epstein’s criminal conduct
were entirely proper and well founded and that Dershowitz’s statements about Edwards and
Cassell were defamatory.
12. In April 2016 Dershowitz settled the Edwards and Cassell defamation claims
against him. As a condition of the settlement, Dershowitz required that the financial terms of the
settlement be kept confidential.
13. In November 2018, after conducting a lengthy investigation that involved
interviewing over eighty (80) women, the Miami Herald published the first in a series of articles
4
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 5 of 28
exposing how Epstein and his lawyers had corrupted the legal system to obtain the NPA and
referring to Dershowitz’s sexual abuse of Roberts. Dershowitz’s response on behalf of himself
and his client and co-conspirator Epstein has been a desperate barrage of false and increasingly
defamatory attacks on Roberts. The purpose and effect of these attacks has been to damage
Robert’s reputation and credibility and to try to intimidate her into silence.
14. Defendant’s central assertion is that Roberts has committed perjury, and that in
December 2014, Roberts and her attorneys hatched a scheme to falsely accuse Dershowitz of sex
trafficking as part of a criminal attempt to extort a settlement from another party.
15. As Defendant and Epstein well knew, Dershowitz’s assertion was false.
Dershowitz and Epstein knew that Dershowitz had in fact had sex with Plaintiff. Dershowitz and
Epstein also knew that Roberts’s assertions about Dershowitz were not part of any criminal
extortion plot. Indeed, Dershowitz and Epstein knew that Roberts had identified Dershowitz as a
sexual predator years before December 2014.
16. Defendant’s knowledge of the falsity of his attacks on Roberts have not, however,
limited the scope or scale of those attacks.
17. Examples of Dershowitz’s knowingly false and malicious defamatory statements
made on behalf of himself and Epstein are:
(a)
November 28, 2018: “the story was 100% flatly categorically made up” and
“Roberts and her attorneys fabricated the assertion in order to get money from other
powerful, wealthy people”. (Exhibit 1, p. 8).
(b)
December 1, 2018: “I never met Roberts; I never had sex with her; she
simply made up the entire story for money”. (Exhibit 2).
5
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 6 of 28
(c)
December 2, 2018: “I was ‘deliberately framed for financial reasons’”;
Roberts made her claims about Dershowitz “in order to obtain money from a
wealthy businessman and that Roberts had never previously included me among
the people with whom she claimed to have had sex”; “one of Roberts’ own lawyers
has acknowledged in front of witnesses that Roberts claims against me are ‘wrong’
‘simply wrong’”; “I never met Roberts; I never had sex with her; she simply made
up the entire story for money”. (Exhibit 3).
(d)
December 4, 2018: Plaintiff is a “certified, complete, total liar”; “I can prove
conclusively that she made the whole thing up”. At the same time Dershowitz
claimed “that the FBI recognized the evidence showed he was not where she said
he was”. (Exhibit 4).
(e)
December 5, 2018: “Roberts made up the accusations out of whole cloth in
order to obtain millions of dollars from Leslie Wexner” and “there is evidence that
directly proves I was framed. These include emails between Roberts and a
journalist, a book manuscript by Roberts and a legal brief that are smoking guns
showing that I was deliberately framed for financial reasons.” (Exhibit 5).
(f)
March 2, 2019: “My perjuring accusers are Virginia Roberts and Sarah
Ransome [who reported that Epstein lent her out to Dershowitz for sex at the same
time as Dershowitz was, at Epstein’s request, representing Ransome as her lawyer].
Both have long records of lying”. (Exhibit 6).
18. Dershowitz and Epstein knew Dershowitz’s assertions about Roberts, including
his assertions referenced in paragraph 17 above, were, and would be taken by persons who read
and heard them to be, specific statements of fact.
6
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 7 of 28
19. Dershowitz has repeatedly, publically claimed that he wanted to have a trial that
would determine the facts concerning his conduct. He said on national television that he would
waive the statute of limitations so that Roberts could sue him for sex abuse. However, when
Robert’s counsel asked Dershowitz to do so, Dershowitz refused -- and continues to refuse.
20. Similarly, when Dershowitz was faced with an actual case brought by Edwards
and Cassell which would have determined the veracity of Roberts’ claims, Dershowitz settled to
avoid that determination.
21. More recently, Dershowitz, perhaps believing that Roberts who is now living with
her husband and children in Australia would not be prepared to engage in litigation, has again
taken to claiming publically that he demands a trial on the question of whether Roberts
committed perjury and made up her statements about him for money. For example on March 2,
2019: My “accusers are Virginia Roberts and Sarah Ransome…I hereby accuse my false
accusers of committing the felony of perjury and challenge them to sue me for defamation.”
(Exhibit 6).
22. Mr. Dershowitz now has what he claims to have been looking for.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
23. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum
jurisdictional limits of this Court.
24. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332
(diversity jurisdiction) in that Roberts and Dershowitz are citizens of different states and the
amount in controversy exceeds seventy-five thousand ($75,000), exclusive of interest and costs.
25. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. Defendant resides in New
York City; Defendant conducts regular business in New York City; and this action arose,
7
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 8 of 28
defamatory statements were made, and abuse occurred, within the Southern District of New
York.
26. Venue is proper in this Court as (a) the cause of action arose within the
jurisdiction of this Court and (b) Defendant resides within this District.
PARTIES
27. Plaintiff is an individual who is a citizen of the State of Florida and a resident of
Australia.
28. Defendant Dershowitz is an individual who resides in the Southern District of
New York at 2 Tudor City Place Apt. 10EN, New York, New York 10017.
29. Jeffrey Epstein is an individual who resides in the Southern District of New York
at 9 East 71 st Street, New York, New York, 10021.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
A. Epstein’s Sex Trafficking Enterprise
30. Plaintiff became a victim of sex trafficking and repeated sexual abuse after being
recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein when Plaintiff was under the age of
eighteen.
31. Between 2000 and 2002, Epstein sexually abused Roberts at numerous locations
including his mansions in West Palm Beach, Florida, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands, and this
District. Epstein also flew Roberts on his plane nationally and internationally numerous times
when she was under the age of 18. Only portions of the flight logs of Epstein’s private planes
are yet known, and Epstein also flew Roberts frequently on commercial airlines to meet him and
others. However, the chart below which shows Roberts’ flights on Epstein’s private plane from
the limited logs that are available illustrates the international scope of Epstein’s sex trafficking.
8
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 9 of 28
32. Between 1999 and 2007, with the assistance of numerous co-conspirators, Epstein
abused more than thirty (30) minor underage girls, a fact confirmed by state and federal law
enforcement.
33. After years of abuse, Epstein sent Roberts to Thailand in September 2002. One of
Roberts’ assignments from Epstein was to bring a young girl back to Epstein in the United
States. Fearing for her life, and not wanting to subject another young girl to the abuse she was
forced to endure, Roberts fled from Thailand to Australia to escape from Epstein.
B. Dershowitz’s Role with Epstein and Abuse of Plaintiff
34. Dershowitz has been “a close friend of Mr. Epstein” for many years. (Exhibit 7).
In 2003, Dershowitz said “I’m on my 20 th book… The only person outside of my immediate
family that I send drafts to is Jeffrey.” “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” Vanity Fair 2003. (Exhibit
8). Dershowitz also described Epstein as his friend “I would be interested in him [Epstein] as a
friend if we had hamburgers on the boardwalk in Coney Island and talked about his ideas.”
“Vanity Fair Reminds US When Jeffrey Epstein Wasn’t a Creep.” The Atlantic Wire. June 21,
2011. Dershowitz frequently traveled with Epstein, including on Epstein’s private plane. In
9
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 10 of 28
addition, Epstein’s employees have confirmed that Dershowitz visited Epstein’s Palm Beach and
New York City mansions often, would stay overnight, and was present when the victims of
Epstein’s sex trafficking were there. Dershowitz also visited Epstein’s other homes.
35. In addition to their close friendship, Dershowitz represented Epstein as his
attorney. On or about December 2, 2018, Dershowitz stated that he is still Epstein’s attorney
(Exhibit 9).
36. During the time period that Roberts was being trafficked by Epstein she was
forced to have sex with Alan Dershowitz. Roberts was forced to engage in sexual acts with
Dershowitz in, among other locations, Epstein’s mansion located at 9 East 71 st Street, New York,
New York 10021.
C. The Arrest and Prosecution of Epstein
37. Epstein ultimately pled guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution, and is now a
registered sex offender.
38. In September 2007, Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”)
in which the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida agreed not to prosecute Epstein
for numerous federal sex crimes committed in that District.
39. In the NPA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida
additionally agreed that it would not institute any federal criminal charges against any potential
co-conspirators of Epstein.
40. Epstein flippantly referred to his sexual abuse of multiple minors, and the slap on
the wrist he had received for it, in a 2011 interview with the New York Post: “Billionaire pervert
Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City – and making wisecracks about his just-ended jail stint
for having sex with an underage girl. ‘I am not a sexual predator, I’m an “offender,”’ the
10
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 11 of 28
financier told The Post yesterday. “‘It’s the difference between a murderer and a person who
steals a bagel,’ said Epstein.” February 25, 2011, New York Post “Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein:
I’m a Sex Offender Not A Predator”.
D. The Criminal Victims’ Rights Act Proceeding
41. Rather than confer with the victims about the NPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office
and Epstein, who was represented by Dershowitz at that time, agreed to a “confidentiality”
provision in the Agreement barring its disclosure to anyone—including Epstein’s victims. As a
consequence, the victims were not told about the NPA.
42. On July 7, 2008, a young woman identified as Jane Doe No. 1, one of Jeffrey
Epstein’s victims (other than Roberts), filed a petition to enforce her rights under the Crime
Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. ¶ 3771, alleging that the Government failed to
provide her the rights promised in the CVRA with regard to the plea arrangement with Epstein.
43. On February 21, 2019, the Court found that the victims’ rights had been violated
and granted summary judgment in favor of the victims finding: “It was a material omission for
the Government to suggest to the victims that they have patience relative to an investigation
about which it had already bound itself not to prosecute.” Order at 31. In its Order the Court
acknowledged that: “Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls”. The Court also
found: “Among other provisions, the NPA expanded immunity to any ‘potential coconspirator’
of Epstein’s: ‘In consideration of Epstein’s agreement to plead guilty and to provide
compensation in the manner described above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and
conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal
charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah
Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff or Nadia Marcinkova… From the time the FBI began
11
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 12 of 28
investigating Epstein until September 24, 2007 – when the NPA was concluded – the Office
never conferred with the victims about a NPA or told the victims that such an agreement was
under consideration.” Order at 2, 8.
E. Victims Refuse Silence
44. Ultimately, as a mother and one of Epstein’s many victims, Roberts concluded
that she should speak out about her sexual abuse experiences in hopes of helping others who had
also suffered from sexual trafficking and abuse, and of possibly protecting future potential
victims.
45. On December 23, 2014, Roberts incorporated an organization called Victims
Refuse Silence, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation.
46. Roberts intended Victims Refuse Silence to change and improve the fight against
sexual abuse and human trafficking. The goal of her organization was, and continues to be, to
help survivors surmount the shame, silence, and intimidation typically experienced by victims of
sexual abuse, and to help others to escape becoming victims of sex trafficking.
F. Defendant Acted Maliciously to Defame, Discredit, and Intimidate Roberts
47. Dershowitz made his false and defamatory statements as set forth above on behalf
of himself and on behalf of his co-conspirator and client Epstein, in the Southern District of New
York and elsewhere, in a deliberate effort to maliciously discredit Roberts and silence her efforts
to expose the sexual abuse she suffered. Dershowitz and Epstein did so with the purpose and
effect of having others repeat such false and defamatory statements and thereby further
damaged Roberts’s reputation. Dershowitz and Epstein knew Dershowitz’s statements were
false.
12
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 13 of 28
48. Dershowitz made his statements to discredit Roberts in concert with Epstein and
others, including Ghislaine Maxwell, one of Epstein’s long-time procurers, as part of a
conspiracy to discredit and try to silence Roberts. Epstein was particularly interested in
discrediting and silencing Roberts because he feared a reopening of a federal criminal
investigation of him.
49. Dershowitz made his statements pursuant to his conspiracy with Epstein and
Maxwell maliciously as part of an effort to conceal sex trafficking crimes committed around the
world by Epstein and other powerful persons.
50. Dershowitz and Epstein intended Dershowitz’s false and defamatory statements
set out above to be broadcast around the world and to intimidate and silence Roberts from
making further efforts to expose sex crimes committed by Epstein and other powerful persons,
including Dershowitz.
51. Dershowitz and Epstein intended their false statements to be specific statements
of fact. Dershowitz’s false statements were, as he and Epstein intended, broadcast around the
world and were reasonably understood by those who heard them to be specific factual claims by
Dershowitz that he had not had sex with Roberts, that Roberts was intentionally lying about
having sex with Dershowitz, that Roberts committed the crime of perjury, that Roberts had
committed the crime of extortion, and that Roberts had intentionally fabricated her assertions
about Dershowitz to extort money from others.
52. Epstein also worked with other of his attorneys to attack Roberts’ allegations,
including in a false statement they made in a letter to the editor to the New York Times asserting:
“The number of young women involved in the investigation has been vastly exaggerated, there
13
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 14 of 28
was no ‘international sex-trafficking operation’ and there was never evidence that Mr. Epstein
‘hosted sex parties’ at his home”. (Exhibit 10).
G. Dershowitz’s Lies
53. From the beginning, Dershowitz and Epstein have sought to hide their crimes
behind a curtain of lies. In response to Roberts’ description of Dershowitz’s participation in
Epstein’s sex trafficking, Dershowitz began a series of intentional, outright lies designed to
distance himself from Epstein, to cover up his own wrongdoing, and to discredit Roberts and
intimidate her into silence.
54. Dershowitz’s repeated lies are compelling evidence both of his lack of credibility
and his guilt. Only a person seeking to conceal improper conduct would have engaged in the
pattern of lies which has characterized Dershowitz’s statements since his sex trafficking was
revealed.
55. In attempt to conceal his relationship with Epstein, Dershowitz in January 2015
asserted that “my relationship with him was entirely professional. It is a total bum rap to say that
I…was ‘chummy’ with him”. (Exhibit 11). That was a lie, as Dershowitz and Epstein knew (see,
e.g., paragraphs 34-35).
56. Both to conceal Dershowitz’s relationship with Epstein, and to discredit Roberts,
Dershowitz has repeatedly asserted that he was only at Epstein’s residence once in Palm Beach,
and that was with his family. However, Juan Alessi, a long time Epstein household employee,
has confirmed that Dershowitz visited Epstein “pretty often. I would say at least four or five
times a year” and that he would “typically” stay two or three days. Similarly, Alfredo Rodriguez
who worked for Epstein approximately only six months confirmed that during that six months
period Dershowitz visited Epstein twice.
14
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 15 of 28
57. Again, both to conceal his relationship with Epstein and to discredit Roberts,
Dershowitz has repeatedly asserted that he was never in Epstein’s residence in the presence of
young women. As both Dershowitz and Epstein know, that assertion was also false. As Mr.
Rodriguez has confirmed, there were “also young ladies in the house at the time he [Dershowitz]
was there”. Mr. Rodriguez also confirmed that “Mr. Dershowitz was there” when “women came
to Mr. Epstein’s home to give a massage”. Mr. Rodriguez also confirmed that “Alan Dershowitz
was at the house” with “the local Palm Beach girls” who he was “told to call masseuses”,
although he did not himself know whether or not Dershowitz personally received a massage.
58. Maria Farmer was an employee of Epstein responsible for “manning the front
door at his New York mansion and keeping records of people who came to the home” (Exhibit
12, ¶ 2).
(a)
Ms. Farmer “witnessed a number of school age girls coming to the house,
some of the young girls would be wearing their school uniforms”…who “then
would be escorted upstairs” (Exhibit 12, ¶ 3).
(b)
Ms. Farmer was told these young girls “were interviewing for modeling
positions” even though “it did not seem credible to me that these young girls were
interviewing for modeling positions”. (Exhibit 12, ¶ 3).
59. Ms. Farmer asserts that “Alan Dershowitz was an individual who came to visit
Epstein at his New York mansion a number of times when I was working for Epstein.
Dershowitz was very comfortable at the home and would come in and walk upstairs. On a
number of occasions I witnessed Dershowitz at the NY mansion going upstairs at the same time
there were young girls under the age of 18 who were present upstairs in the house” (Exhibit 12, ¶
4).
15
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 16 of 28
60. Ms. Farmer, like other victims of, and witnesses to, Epstein and Dershowitz’s sex
trafficking and abuse has been subjected to attacks and intimidations. (Exhibit 12, ¶¶ 8-9). Her
courageous testimony, together with the sworn testimony of victims such as Sarah Ransome and
witnesses such as Mr. Alessi and Mr. Rodriguez , proves beyond any doubt that Dershowitz’s
claims that he was never present where Ms. Roberts was trafficked, and never in the presence of
young girls, are a lie intended to cover up his culpability.
61. Again both to conceal his relationship with Epstein and to discredit Roberts,
Dershowitz has repeatedly asserted that he has records that prove that it would have been
“impossible” for him to be with Roberts because he was never in the same place and time as
Roberts. As both Dershowitz and Epstein know, that too was a lie. The testimony of Epstein’s
household staff establishes that Dershowitz was repeatedly at Epstein’s residence. Even
Dershowitz’s own selected, incomplete, and apparently revised, records demonstrate that
Dershowitz was present at locations where Ms. Roberts was with Epstein.
62. Dershowitz’s assertion that Roberts accused him of having sex with her only after
her lawyers convinced her to do so in late 2014 is not only false, as both Dershowitz and Epstein
knew, but thoroughly disproved by the record.
63. Roberts had identified Dershowitz as a participant in her sexual abuse at the time
it occurred. She did so again in 2009. In 2010 Epstein’s co-conspirators were repeatedly asked
about Dershowitz. For example:
(a)
Adriana Ross refused to answer on Fifth Amendment grounds whether
“Alan Dershowitz stays at Jeffrey Epstein’s house…when underage minor
females have been in the bedroom with Jeffrey Epstein”.
16
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 17 of 28
(b)
Nadia Marcinkova refused to answer on Fifth Amendment grounds:
“Alan Dershowitz is also somebody that you also know to have been at the house
when L.M. was being sexually abused in Jeffrey Epstein’s bedroom, correct?”
64. In 2011 Counsel for Edwards wrote Dershowitz:
(a)
On August 23, 2011: “We…have reason to believe that you have
personally observed Jeffrey Epstein in the presence of underage females”.
(b)
On September 7, 2011: “Multiple individuals have placed you in the
presence of Jeffrey Epstein on multiple occasions and in various locations when
Jeffrey Epstein was in the company of underage females subsequently identified
as victims of Mr. Epstein’s criminal molestations.”
65. Dershowitz lied and stated that he had never flown on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane
with a young woman and always flew with his wife. (Hala Gorani, CNN Live, Jan. 5, 2015).
However, even the limited publically available flight logs of Jeffrey Epstein’s private plane
demonstrate that Dershowitz flew often on Epstein’s planes without his wife; with young
women, including a Victoria’s Secret model; Epstein’s procurer Ghislaine Maxwell; and Sarah
Kellen who was identified by the Government as Epstein’s co-conspirator in his sex trafficking.
66. Dershowitz also lied by saying that he “never” got a massage from anybody: “I
never got a massage from anybody. It’s made up out of whole cloth.” (NY Daily News, January
21, 2015). However, after it was revealed that Epstein’s household staff identified Dershowitz as
one of the recipients of “massages” at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion, Dershowitz changed his
story and admitted he got a massage at Epstein’s Palm Beach home but claimed: “I kept my
underwear on during the massage.” (Local 10, January 22, 2015).
17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 18 of 28
67. Dershowitz lied and said he never saw any naked pictures of females in Epstein’s
Palm Beach home during his many visits, yet the police footage that was obtained from the
search of Epstein’s home proves that there were naked pictures of females throughout the home
including in the common areas.
68. In a desperate attempt to deflect attention from his own misconduct, Dershowitz
fabricated an extortion plot by Roberts and her lawyers. Dershowitz falsely told the media that
he was being used as a pawn as part of a fanciful plan to extort money from a billionaire business
mogul and colleague of Epstein. Dershowitz’s claim was that he was framed in order to send a
message to the billionaire that this is what would happen to the billionaire if the billionaire did
not pay Roberts and her attorneys. As Dershowitz knew:
(a)
(b)
(c)
No complaint was ever made against the billionaire.
No money was either paid or demanded by or from the billionaire.
Roberts’ assertions about Dershowitz long predated the time of the alleged
extortion plot.
69. Dershowitz also falsely claimed that Roberts’ lawyer had told him that he had
concluded that Roberts was “wrong” and “simply wrong” in accusing Dershowitz. Dershowitz,
in violation of the canons of ethics and in at least one case in violation of state law, had
surreptitiously tape recorded confidential settlement negotiations he had engaged in with Ms.
Roberts’ lawyer. Dershowitz then played and described excerpts from those tapes out of context
to reporters to try to make it appear that Ms. Roberts’ lawyer’s hypothetical comments, and
characterizations of Dershowitz’s assertions, represented that lawyer’s conclusions. As the sworn
testimony (Exhibit 13) of Dershowitz’s own lawyer, and the facts set forth below, demonstrate,
Dershowitz’s assertions about what Ms. Roberts’ lawyer said are, again, false.
18
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 19 of 28
70. In May 2015 Dershowitz requested confidential settlement negotiations with Ms.
Roberts’ lawyers in which Dershowitz sought to convince Ms. Roberts lawyer that Ms. Roberts
was mistaken, and that the person to whom Epstein had lent Ms. Roberts was Nathan Myhrvold,
not Dershowitz. Dershowitz claimed that he had been at Epstein’s home only once (and that he
was there with his family); that he had never been in the vicinity of Epstein’s island; that he had
not been at Epstein’s New York mansion; and that he had been at Epstein’s New Mexico ranch
only once for a few hours (again with his family). Dershowitz provided a summary of his
whereabouts that purported to prove that his assertions were true.
71. Dershowitz was told that, based on what was shown in his summary, it would
have been impossible for Ms. Roberts’ assertions about him to be true, and that if his assertions
proved out, Ms. Roberts counsel would undertake to convince her that she must have made a
mistake.
(a)
Dershowitz was also told, however, (i) that his assertions would have to be
proven, (ii) that Ms. Roberts had always been very clear that she recalled having
had sex with Dershowitz multiple times, and (iii) that everyone was convinced
that Ms. Roberts was telling the truth as she recalled it.
(b)
Dershowitz responded that he did not doubt that Ms. Roberts was telling
the truth as she recalled it and that she would have no difficulty passing a lie
detector test. He said he simply believed Ms. Roberts had made an honest mistake
in confusing him with Nathan Myhrvold.
72. Following Dershowitz’ presentations, Dershowitz’s representations were
investigated and repeatedly proven false.
19
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 20 of 28
(a)
Dershowitz’s alleged backup for his travel summary proved to be
incomplete and in some instances apparently altered.
(b)
Dershowitz’s key claim that he had not stayed at Epstein’s house was
proven false, including by the testimony of Epstein’s household employees Juan
Alessi (see ¶ 56 above) and Alfredo Rodriguez (see ¶¶ 56-57 above) as well as the
testimony of Sarah Ransome (Exhibit 14) and Maria Farmer (Exhibit 12).
(c)
Dershowitz’s claim that Ms. Roberts confused him with Nathan Myhrvold
was tested by showing Ms. Roberts pictures of both. She was, and is, clear that it
was Dershowitz, not Myhrvold, with whom she had sex.
(d)
Dershowitz’s claim he had never been on Epstein’s plane without his wife
was proven false by plane logs.
(e)
Dershowitz’s claim that he had never seen pictures of young females at
Epstein’s house was proven false by Palm Beach police and FBI reports.
(f)
Dershowitz’s claim that he had never been in the presence of young
females was proven false by the testimony of Epstein’s household employer (see
¶¶56-57) and of young women themselves (see Exhibit 14 [Ransome] and Exhibit
12 [Farmer].)
73. After Dershowitz’s claimed proof of exonerating evidence collapsed, and the
evidence of his guilt grew, Roberts’ lawyer’s told Dershowitz in writing that they “had
discovered evidence inconsistent with some of [your] representations”, that his travel “records
were incomplete”, and that he “should have settled the case when he had a chance”.
74. Roberts’ lawyer explicitly told Dershowitz that neither Roberts nor her lawyer
would make any statement saying or implying that Roberts was mistaken in her charge that
20
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 21 of 28
Dershowitz participated in her sexual trafficking and abuse. In his public statements, Dershowitz
conspicuously omits any reference to the statements by Roberts’ lawyers after they had
investigated his representations and concluded that they were false.
75. Faced with the mounting evidence of his guilt, Dershowitz abandoned his attempt
to get Roberts or her lawyer to concede a mistake or that Roberts had been wrong, and
desperately sought even a suggestion that an error was “possible”.
76. In December 2015 Ms. Roberts’ counsel again told Mr. Dershowitz that “Virginia
is adamant about her current recollection” and that neither Ms. Roberts nor her counsel believed
she was mistaken in identifying Mr. Dershowitz as one of the men to whom Epstein had lent her
out for sex. In response, Mr. Dershowitz did not claim that Ms. Roberts lawyers had told him
that they did not believe her.
77. Instead, the morning of December 9, 2015, Mr. Dershowitz pleaded: “David,
Have we given up on a mutually acceptable statement from VR or you. Let’s keep trying. We are
not that far apart.” (Exhibit 15). When Ms. Roberts lawyer did not immediately respond, Mr.
Dershowitz wrote later the same day:
“We should be aiming at a short simple statement such as: “The
events at issue occurred approximately 15 years ago when I was a
teenager. Although I believed then and continued to believe that AD
was the person with whom I had sex, recent developments raise the
possibility that this may be a case of mistaken identification.”
(Exhibit 15).
Mr. Dershowitz went on to write: “It would be acceptable if the statement came from you rather
than her, if she prefers.” (Id.)
21
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 22 of 28
78. Wholly absent at this point was any assertion by Mr. Dershowitz that Ms. Roberts
was lying, or that she made up her charge as part of an extortion claim, or that after investigating
his alleged evidence Ms. Roberts’ lawyer did not believe her. On the contrary, Mr. Dershowitz
expressly recognized that Ms. Roberts’ belief was an honest one. All Mr. Dershowitz was
pleading for was an acknowledgement that there was a “possibility” that there “may be” a case of
mistaken identification. Even that plea was rejected by Ms. Roberts and her lawyers as
misleading.
79. Dershowitz’s present PR claim that Roberts’ lawyers disbelieved their client, and
that Roberts intentionally committed perjury as part of an extortion scheme, is just another
Dershowitz lie. His reliance on statements taken out of context, his failure to include the
statements of Roberts’ lawyer after Dershowitz’s supposed evidence had been investigated, and
the damning admissions of his own lawyers, reveal Dershowitz’s total lack of support for his
allegation that Roberts and her lawyers concocted knowingly false allegation against him as part
of a supposed extortion plot.
80. Dershowitz also lied to attempt to deflect Sarah Ransome’s revelations about him.
Ms. Ransome revealed that during the time she was a victim of Epstein’s sex trafficking,
Epstein’s arranged for his lawyer, Dershowitz, to also represent Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome
also described how, during the time Dershowitz was her lawyer, Epstein lent her out to
Dershowitz for sex. (Exhibit 14).
81. Dershowitz asserted that he never had sex with Ms. Ransome, that he never
represented Ms. Ransome, that he did not even know Ms. Ransome, and that Ms. Ransome’s
statements about him were fabricated by Ms. Roberts’ lawyer in retaliation for a bar complaint
that Dershowitz had filed against that lawyer (Exhibit 16). However, as Dershowitz knew:
22
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 23 of 28
(a)
(b)
(c)
He did have sex with Ms. Ransome.
He was Ms. Ransome’s lawyer.
Ms. Ransome’s statements about her involvement with Dershowitz
preceded any contact with Roberts’ attorneys. For example, Ransome’s first
contact with any of Roberts’ lawyers was in November 2016, and at least as early
as October 2016 Ransome had identified Dershowitz in writing to a reporter as
someone who had had sex with one or more of the girls provided by Epstein and
that Epstein had arranged for Dershowitz to be Ransome’s lawyer.
82. After settling the case against him brought by Messrs. Edwards and Cassell,
Dershowitz told the media he had been vindicated, while at the same time insisting that the term
of the settlement remains confidential. Edwards and Cassell responded: “Following the
announcement of the settlement of defamation claims against Alan Dershowitz, he has been
making public statements suggesting that he has prevailed in the lawsuit and that the terms of the
settlement exonerate him of any wrongdoing. Those statements are at best misleading. It is a
mistake for anyone to conclude based upon Mr. Dershowitz’s statements that the case against
him was abandoned due to lack of factual support. It is a mistake for anyone to conclude based
upon Dershowitz’s statements that Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell had determined that the
allegations against Alan Dershowitz made by Virginia Roberts Giuffre were false or unfounded.
Neither the terms of settlement nor the agreed upon joint public statement issued as part of the
settlement support any such conclusion and it is false to state or suggest otherwise.” Dershowitz
Settles Sex Case, But is He Vindicated? The American Lawyer, April 10, 2016.
83. Dershowitz continues to this day to insist that the terms of his settlement with
Edwards and Cassell remain confidential -- a position that can only be explained by
23
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 24 of 28
Dershowitz’s knowledge that revealing how much he had paid to avoid a trial of the allegations
against him would reveal his guilt.
84. As described above, Dershowitz has also repeatedly asserted that he wanted to
have a trial to establish his innocence. By contrast, he paid to settle the case that would have
provided that trial. He even lied about his being willing to waive the statute of limitations so that
Roberts could sue him for sex abuse -- a lie almost immediately exposed when he was promptly
asked to do so and, equally promptly refused.
COUNT I DEFAMATION
85. Plaintiff Roberts re-alleges paragraphs 1 – 84 as if the same were fully set forth
herein. Dershowitz made his false and defamatory statements deliberately and maliciously with
the intent to intimidate, discredit and defame Roberts.
86. In December 2018, and thereafter, Dershowitz, on behalf of himself and Epstein,
intentionally and maliciously released to the press his false statements about Roberts in an
attempt to destroy Roberts’ reputation and brand her as a liar and cause her to lose all credibility
in her efforts to help victims of sex trafficking.
87. Dershowitz and Epstein knew that Dershowitz’s assertions would dilute, discredit,
and neutralize Roberts’s public and private messages to sexual abuse victims and ultimately
prevent Roberts from effectively providing assistance and advocacy on behalf of other victims of
sex trafficking, or expose her abusers.
88. Using his role as a powerful lawyer with powerful friends, Dershowitz’s
statements were published internationally for the malicious purpose of further damaging a sexual
abuse and sexual trafficking victim; to destroy Roberts’s reputation and credibility; to cause the
24
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 25 of 28
world to disbelieve Roberts; and to destroy Roberts’s efforts to use her experience to help others
suffering as sex trafficking victims.
89. Dershowitz, personally, intentionally, and maliciously made false and damaging
statements of fact concerning Roberts, as detailed above, in the Southern District of New York
and elsewhere.
90. The false statements that Dershowitz made, personally on behalf of himself and
Epstein not only called Roberts’s truthfulness and integrity into question, but also exposed
Roberts to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, and disgrace.
91. At the time Dershowitz made his false statements, he and Epstein, knew full well
that they were completely false.
92. Dershowitz’s false statements constitute libel, as he and Epstein knew that they
were going to be transmitted in writing, widely disseminated on the internet and in print.
Dershowitz intended his false statements to be published by newspaper and other media outlets
internationally, and they were, in fact, published globally, including within the Southern District
of New York.
93. Dershowitz’s false statements constitute libel per se, including that they accused
her of a crime, and including that they exposed Roberts to public contempt, ridicule, aversion,
and disgrace, and induced an evil opinion of her in the minds of right-thinking persons.
94. Dershowitz’s false statements also constitute libel per se, inasmuch, among other
reasons, as they tended to injure Roberts in her professional capacity as the president of a nonprofit
corporation designed to help victims of sex trafficking, and inasmuch as they destroyed her
credibility and reputation among members of the community that seeks her help and that she
seeks to serve.
25
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 26 of 28
95. Dershowitz’s false statements directly stated and also implied that in speaking out
against sex trafficking Roberts acted with fraud, dishonesty, and unfitness for the task.
Dershowitz’s false statements directly and indirectly assert that Roberts lied about being sexually
trafficked and abused by Epstein and having sex with Dershowitz, and that Roberts committed
the crimes of perjury and extortion. Dershowitz’s false statements were reasonably understood
by many persons who read his statements as conveying that specific intention and meaning.
96. Dershowitz’s false statements were reasonably understood by many persons who
read those statements as making specific factual claims that Roberts was lying about specific
facts, and committed the crimes of perjury and extortion.
97. Dershowitz specifically directed his false statements at Roberts’ true public
description of factual events, and many persons who read Dershowitz’s statements reasonably
understood that those statements referred directly to Roberts’ account of the abuse she suffered at
the hands of Epstein and Dershowitz.
98. Dershowitz and Epstein intended Dershowitz’s false statements to be widely
published and disseminated on television, through newspapers, by word of mouth, and on the
internet. As intended by Dershowitz and Epstein, Dershowitz’s statements were published and
disseminated around the world.
99. Dershowitz made his false statements on behalf of himself and Epstein in reckless
disregard of their truth or falsity and with malicious intent to destroy Roberts’s reputation and
credibility; to prevent her from further disseminating her life story; and to cause persons hearing
or reading Roberts’s descriptions of truthful facts to disbelieve her entirely. Dershowitz made his
false statements on behalf of himself and Epstein wantonly and with the specific intent to
maliciously damage Roberts’s good name and reputation in a way that would destroy her efforts
26
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 27 of 28
to administer her non-profit foundation, or share her life story, and thereby help others who have
suffered from sexual abuse.
100. As a result of Dershowitz’s and Epstein’s campaign to spread false, discrediting,
and defamatory statements about Roberts, Roberts suffered substantial damages in an amount to
be proven at trial.
101. Dershowitz’s false statements have caused, and continue to cause, Roberts
economic damage, psychological pain and suffering, mental anguish and emotional distress, and
other direct and consequential damages and losses.
102. Dershowitz’s and Epstein’s campaign to spread his false statements nationally and
internationally was unusual and particularly egregious conduct. Dershowitz and Epstein sexually
abused and trafficked Roberts, conspired to avoid having these crimes properly prosecuted and
discovered, and wantonly and maliciously set out to falsely accuse, defame, and discredit
Roberts to deny and conceal the scope and scale of their crimes. In so doing, Dershowitz’s
efforts constituted a public wrong by deterring, damaging, and setting back Roberts’ efforts to
help victims of sex trafficking. Accordingly, this is a case in which exemplary and punitive
damages are appropriate.
103. Punitive and exemplary damages are necessary in this case to deter Dershowitz,
Epstein and others from wantonly and maliciously using a campaign of lies to discredit Roberts
and other victims of sex trafficking.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Roberts respectfully requests judgment against Defendant
Dershowitz, awarding compensatory, consequential, exemplary, and punitive damages in an
27
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 28 of 28
amount to be determined at trial, but in excess of the $75,000 jurisdictional requirement; costs of
suit; attorneys’ fees; and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all causes of action asserted within this
pleading.
Dated: April 16, 2019.
/s/ Joshua Schiller
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
55 Hudson Yards
New York, NY 10001
(212) 446-2300
/s/ Sigrid McCawley
Sigrid McCawley
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954) 356-0011
(Pro Hac To Be Filed)
28
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 18
EXHIBIT 1
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 18
Page 1 of 17
Even from jail, sex abuser manipulated the system. His victims were kept in the dark
BY Julie K. Brown
NOV. 28, 2018
A decade before #MeToo, a multimillionaire sex offender from Florida got the ultimate break.
��
Palm Beach County Courthouse
June 30, 2008
Jeffrey Edward Epstein appeared at his sentencing dressed comfortably in a blue blazer, blue shirt, jeans and gray sneakers. His attorney, Jack
Goldberger, was at his side.
At the end of the 68-minute hearing, the 55-year-old silver-haired financier — accused of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls — was fingerprinted
and handcuffed, just like any other criminal sentenced in Florida.
But inmate No. W35755 would not be treated like other convicted sex offenders in the state of Florida, which has some of the strictest sex offender laws in
the nation.
Ten years before the #MeToo movement raised awareness about the kid-glove handling of powerful men accused of sexual abuse, Epstein’s lenient
sentence and his extraordinary treatment while in custody are still the source of consternation for the victims he was accused of molesting when they
were minors.
Beginning as far back as 2001, Epstein lured a steady stream of underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion to engage in nude massages, masturbation, oral
sex and intercourse, court and police records show. The girls — mostly from disadvantaged, troubled families — were recruited from middle and high
schools around Palm Beach County. Epstein would pay the girls for massages and offer them further money to bring him new girls every time he was at
his home in Palm Beach, according to police reports.
The girls, now in their late 20s and early 30s, allege in a series of federal civil lawsuits filed over the past decade that Epstein sexually abused hundreds of
girls, not only in Palm Beach, but at his homes in Manhattan, New Mexico and in the Caribbean.
In 2007, the FBI had prepared a 53-page federal indictment charging Epstein with sex crimes that could have put him in federal prison for life. But then-
Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta signed off on a non-prosecution agreement, which was negotiated, signed and sealed so that no one would know
the full scope of Epstein’s crimes. The indictment was shelved, never to be seen again.
Epstein instead pleaded guilty to lesser charges in state court, and was required to register as a sex offender. He was sentenced to 18 months
incarceration.
But Epstein — who had a long list of powerful, politically connected friends — didn’t go to state prison like most sex offenders in Florida. Instead, the
multimillionaire was assigned to a private wing of the Palm Beach County stockade, where he was able to hire his own security detail. Even then, he didn’t
spend much time in a cell. He was allowed to go to his downtown West Palm Beach office for work release, up to 12 hours a day, six days a week, records
show.
Read Next
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 18
Page 2 of 17
LOCAL
Sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein was surrounded by powerful people. Here’s a sampling
He was permitted to hire his own private psychologist for his required sex-offender counseling, and after his release from jail, his subsequent year of
probation under house arrest was filled with trips on his corporate jet to Manhattan and to his home in the U.S. Virgin Islands — all approved by the courts
with no objections from the state.
On the morning of his sentencing in 2008, none of Epstein’s victims were in the courtroom to protest his soft jail term or the unusual provisions of his
incarceration and probation — and that was by design.
Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein is a free man, despite sexually abusing dozens of underage girls according to police and prosecutors. His
victims have never had a voice, until now.
By
Emails and letters contained in court filings reveal the cozy, behind-the-scenes dealings between federal prosecutors and Epstein’s indomitable legal
team during the run-up to his federal plea deal, as they discussed ways to minimize his criminal charges and avoid informing the girls about the details of
the deal until after the case was resolved.
That arrangement benefited Epstein in a number of ways. Unlike other high-profile sex crime cases, federal prosecutors agreed to keep his sentencing
quiet, thereby limiting media coverage. His underage victims — identified in FBI documents — weren’t told about the plea deal so they weren’t in court,
where they could voice their objections and possibly sway the judge to give Epstein a harsher sentence or reject the agreement altogether.
Most important, Epstein’s crimes would be reduced to felony prostitution charges, giving him the ability to argue that the girls weren’t victims at all —
they were prostitutes.
Four accomplices named in Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement — Nadia Marcinkova, Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross and Lesley Groff — were also given
immunity from federal prosecution. Marcinkova was a young girl when Epstein brought her from Yugoslavia to live with him. Several victims told police
that she was involved in orgies with Epstein and underage girls. Ross, Groff and Kellen, now known by her married name, Vickers, were schedulers who
arranged his underage sex sessions, according to the FBI and police.
Marcinkova and Kellen, through their attorneys, declined to comment for this story. The Herald was unsuccessful in reaching Ross and Groff.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 18
Page 3 of 17
Acosta, who is now President Donald Trump’s secretary of labor, told lawmakers last year at his confirmation hearing that he did not know that Epstein
would receive such liberal treatment while incarcerated. But court records show that federal prosecutors under his authority acquiesced to many of
Epstein’s demands, including that he not go to federal or state prison.
“I can’t remember how I found out that he had taken a plea,’’ said Courtney Wild, identified by the FBI as one of more than three dozen underage girls —
some of them as young as 13 — who had been molested by Epstein at his waterfront estate between 2001 and 2005.
“We were purposefully misled into believing that his sentencing [in state court] had nothing to do with the federal crimes he committed against me or the
other girls.’’
Epstein, now 65, was released in 2009 after serving 13 months.
Wild, who was 14 when she met Epstein, is suing the federal government, alleging that prosecutors kept her and other victims in the dark as part of a
conspiracy to give Epstein — described in the lawsuit as “a powerful, politically connected multimillionaire” — one of the most lenient deals for a serial
child sex offender in history.
Courtney Wild is suing the federal government, claiming that prosecutors deliberately kept her and other victims of Jeffrey Epstein in the dark about the status of his case. The
U.S. Attorney’s Office signed a non-prosecution agreement with the multimillionaire. Emily Michot EMICHOT@MIAMIHERALD.COM
Now 31, Wild is Jane Doe No. 1 in “Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 vs. the United States,” which seeks to overturn Epstein’s plea agreement on the grounds that
it was executed in violation of the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act. The measure affords crime victims a series of rights, including to confer with
prosecutors and to be notified about plea negotiations and sentencing.
That lawsuit — and an unrelated state court case scheduled for trial on Dec. 4 — could expose more about Epstein’s crimes, as well as who else was
involved and whether there was any undue influence that tainted the federal case.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 5 of 18
Page 4 of 17
Support investigative journalism
The Miami Herald obtained thousands of FBI and court records, lawsuits, and witness depositions, and went to federal court in New York to access sealed documents in the reporting of ""Perversion of
Justice."" The Herald also tracked down more than 60 women who said they were victims, some of whom had never spoken of the abuse before.
Your digital subscription, starting at $0.99 for the first month, supports investigative journalism like this.
CLICK TO SUBSCRIBE
Some of Epstein’s victims will finally have an opportunity to testify for the first time as part of the Dec. 4 case in state court in Palm Beach County. It pits
Fort Lauderdale attorney Bradley Edwards against Epstein, who had accused Edwards of malfeasance in his representation of several victims.
Jack Scarola, the attorney representing Edwards, said Epstein should be held accountable for his unrelenting attacks against Edwards — as well as others
who were involved in his case.
“We are going to demonstrate through this case that no one — no matter how much money they have — can abuse children and then attempt to bully
those who come to the defense of children,’’ said Scarola, a former state prosecutor.
Florida and beyond
Few people had as much insight into Epstein’s lifestyle — and its international reach — as Virginia Roberts. By age 16, Roberts had lived a life that was
beyond that of most high school girls.
At 11, she says, she was sexually molested by a family friend. At 12, she was smoking pot and skipping school. At 13, she was in and out of foster homes, and
at 14, she was on the street.
In Miami, the runaway became a captive of a 65-year-old sex trafficker, Ron Eppinger. For months, she says, she was sexually abused, kept in an
apartment and pimped out to pedophiles. After his indictment in 2000 on trafficking charges, Roberts returned to West Palm Beach and tried to heal.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 6 of 18
Page 5 of 17
Virginia Roberts, now Giuffre, says she was 16 and working as a locker room attendant at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort when she was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell,
Jeffrey Epstein’s associate, about becoming a masseuse for Epstein. COURTESY OF VIRGINIA ROBERTS
That summer, when Roberts was 16, she said her father helped her get a job as a locker room attendant at the spa at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in
Palm Beach, records show. Her father worked at the resort as a maintenance man.
There she said she met Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epstein friend and socialite daughter of the late British publishing magnate Robert Maxwell. She offered
Roberts an opportunity to become a massage therapist, working for Epstein.
In a sworn court affidavit and in a recent interview with the Herald, Roberts described how Epstein and Maxwell began grooming her — not just to
perform massages, but to sexually pleasure them and others.
“It started with one and it trickled into two and so on,’’ Roberts told the Herald. “And before you know it, I’m being lent out to politicians and academics
and royalty.’’
Roberts, too, was ordered to find Epstein girls — the younger, the better — by trolling areas where teenagers congregated, such as shopping malls, to lure
girls to whatever residence Epstein was staying in at the time, she told the Herald.
She began to travel with Epstein and Maxwell to Epstein’s other homes, in New York, New Mexico and the U.S. Virgin Islands — and her trips are
documented in flight logs that frequently list her name or her initials as a passenger, court records show.
“His appetite was insatiable. He wanted new girls, fresh, young faces every single day — that was just the sickness that he had,’’ Roberts said.
Neither Epstein nor his lead attorney, Goldberger, responded to requests for comment.
Roberts alleges that Epstein had cameras throughout his homes and said he liked her to tell him about the sexual peccadilloes of various important men
she had sex with.
“Epstein and Maxwell also got girls for Epstein’s friends and acquaintances. Epstein specifically told me that the reason for him doing this was so that
they would ‘owe him,’ they would ‘be in his pocket,’ and he would ‘have something on them,’ ” Roberts said in a court affidavit. “I understood him to
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 7 of 18
Page 6 of 17
mean that when someone was in his pocket, they owed him favors.’’
Roberts elaborated in her interview with the Herald, saying that Epstein had access to girls through a modeling agency that recruited them from overseas.
Epstein, who was close to Les Wexner, the owner of Victoria’s Secret, often talked about his connections to people in the modeling, fashion and acting
industries, Roberts told the Herald.
“He [Epstein] would tell the girls, ‘Hey, I will give you a modeling contract if you go have sex with this man [whichever acquaintance Epstein
designated],’ ’’ she said.
Roberts’ story about the modeling agency is supported, to a degree, by the sworn statement of a Miami woman named Maritza Vasquez, who was later
interviewed in New York by an FBI agent from Miami. Vasquez worked as a bookkeeper for Mc2, owned by Epstein associate Jean-Luc Brunel. He
employed scouts in South America, Europe and the former Soviet Union to find him models to bring to the United States, Vasquez said in a 2010 sworn
court deposition obtained by the Herald.
Vasquez stated in the deposition that from 2003 to 2006 she handled all the finances and payroll for the agency, including a bank transaction involving
Epstein. She said Epstein invested $1 million in Mc2.
The models were often very young — 13, 14 and 15 — and some of them were housed in apartments at 301 E. 66th St. in New York, a building purportedly
owned by Epstein, the deposition said.
Epstein didn’t charge the girls rent, Vasquez said, but Brunel charged them $1,000 a month, with four of them at a time sharing one apartment. The girls
who were the youngest and most beautiful stayed at the 66th Street apartments, which were more luxurious than the other apartments that were used to
house models who were not as young and desirable, she said.
Vasquez once let one of the models, who was 14, stay overnight with her after the girl ran into trouble with police for trying to get into a Manhattan
nightclub. Vasquez also testified that she helped a lawyer obtain visas for the foreign models, and assisted with their transportation to and from modeling
assignments and parties.
Vasquez said that even though the agency employed 200 to 300 models, the company didn’t make any money and Brunel was always broke. Brunel would
later sue Epstein, alleging that the financier’s sex scandal had caused his business to fail, but the suit was eventually dropped.
Vasquez testified it wasn’t unusual for the agency to send girls to an assignment with a wealthy client for $100,000 or more, but the girl wouldn’t be paid
the full amount — or anything at all — if she refused to be “molested.’’
Vasquez considered herself a mother figure and often coached the youngest girls to stick to the 9-to-5 modeling assignments because she didn’t think it
was appropriate for them to be having sex.
She said she met Epstein only once, but she often helped arrange for girls — many of them underage — to be sent to his homes in New York, Palm Beach
and his island in the Caribbean for parties. She heard salacious rumors about Epstein’s parties, but testified she had no firsthand knowledge about
whether they involved sex.
Vasquez said that she was questioned by the FBI and she tried to tell agents where to look for evidence.
Vasquez was eventually let go from the agency after she was accused of stealing money — money she claims was given to her by Brunel. Vasquez said she
was placed on probation for the theft. She never heard from the FBI about Epstein again.
The Herald was unsuccessful in reaching Brunel through his former attorney.
In a written statement released in 2015, Brunel denied any involvement in trafficking underage models.
“I strongly deny having participated, neither directly nor indirectly, in the actions Mr. Jeffrey Epstein is being accused of,” he said. “I strongly deny
having committed any illicit act or any wrongdoing in the course of my work as a scouter or model agencies manager.”
Too old at 19
In 2003, when Roberts turned 19, it was clear that Epstein had lost interest because she was too old for him, she said. She convinced him to pay for her to
get training to become a real professional masseuse so that she could move on.
In an interview, she explained that Epstein arranged for her to take a class in Thailand, but it came with a hitch: She said she was instructed to pick up a
Thai girl he had arranged to come to the States.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 8 of 18
Page 7 of 17
Roberts, who showed the Herald the written instructions for the rendezvous, never picked up the girl because Roberts met a man on the trip who would
become her husband. The couple married and moved to Australia, where they currently live.
In 2007 — at the same time the FBI was investigating Epstein — Roberts, pregnant with her second child, said she unexpectedly received phone calls from
Maxwell and Epstein. She said they were worried that she had told police about them. She assured them she had not spoken to anyone, she said.
Shortly afterward, Roberts said, she was contacted by someone who claimed to be with the FBI. But she was afraid to tell that person details, fearing it was
really an Epstein associate posing as an FBI agent.
That agent, identified in court papers as Timothy Slater, confirmed that he and the other agent on the case, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, called Roberts in January
or February 2007. In a sworn statement, Slater said he informed Roberts that they suspected she was a victim of Epstein’s.
The agent said Roberts answered basic questions, but became uncomfortable and “asked that I not bother her again.’’
Roberts said the agent didn’t try too hard to convince her to talk, and she was surprised when he hung up after asking her a few graphic questions about
her sex life. She said she was suspicious, but would have cooperated had the FBI talked to her in person and explained why they were asking about
Epstein.
“I was still scared to death,’’ Roberts said. “Jeffrey used to tell me that he owned the entire Palm Beach Police Department. I just didn’t want my family
harmed.’’
She nevertheless was listed by federal prosecutors as one of Epstein’s Palm Beach victims.
As the years went by and Roberts had a daughter, she would be haunted by a fear that Epstein was still taking advantage of young girls. In 2011, she went
public in a paid interview with a British tabloid, the Daily Mail, asserting that she had had sex with Prince Andrew, one of Epstein’s friends, several times
when she was a teen.
In her 2015 affidavit, she discussed in detail some of her alleged sex encounters with the prince and Epstein’s other friends, including lawyer Alan
Dershowitz. Edwards included the affidavit in the court file as part of the Jane Does’ Crime Victims’ Rights Act case, at which time it became public.
Virginia Roberts says she was loaned out by Jeffrey Epstein to his friend Prince Andrew, shown here. He denies they had sex. COURTESY OF VIRGINIA ROBERTS
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 9 of 18
Page 8 of 17
In the affidavit, Roberts claimed that Epstein and Maxwell directed her to have sex with Andrew and Dershowitz and others. She had sex with Andrew
three times, she alleged — once in London, when she was 17, again in New York, when she was 17, and a third time, as part of an orgy on Epstein’s island,
when she was 18. By law, at 17, she would have been above the age of consent in New York and England, but not in Florida, where the age of consent is 18.
As part of the affidavit, Roberts furnished a photograph of her with the prince and Maxwell, which she said was taken in London.
Dershowitz, who was part of Epstein’s criminal defense team, was often a guest at Epstein’s homes, she said.
“I had sexual intercourse with Dershowitz at least six times,’’ Roberts wrote in the 2015 court affidavit. “The first time was when I was about 16, early on
in my servitude to Epstein and it continued until I was 19.’’ She detailed some of those alleged trysts, which she said happened at Epstein’s homes in Palm
Beach, New Mexico and on Epstein’s island.
One of Epstein’s housemen, Juan Alessi, testified in a 2009 sworn deposition that Dershowitz visited Epstein’s Palm Beach home four or five times a year.
He said that Roberts was a frequent visitor as well, but he never placed Dershowitz and Roberts at the house at the same time.
Alessi, who testified he worked for Epstein from 1999 to 2002, said there were often young girls who gave massages at the house, even in the middle of the
night. But he said he never checked their ages, and only knew one girl for certain who was underage, because he had picked her up from high school. That
girl, who is now an actress, was not one of Epstein’s masseuses, Alessi said.
He also said he was Maxwell’s driver, and he recalls waiting outside of Mar-a-Lago the day Maxwell met Roberts. He testified he saw Maxwell talking to
Roberts and recalls Roberts coming to Epstein’s mansion later that day. One of Alessi’s jobs was to drive Maxwell to various spas in Palm Beach where she
left business cards in order to “recruit’’ more masseuses, he said in the sworn deposition.
Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and Maxwell have long denied Roberts’ allegations.
In an interview with the Herald, Dershowitz reiterated that he had never met Roberts, and never saw Epstein with any underage girls.
“The story was 100 percent flatly categorically made-up,’’ he said, adding that Roberts and her attorneys fabricated the assertion in order to get money
from other powerful, wealthy people she alleges she had sex with.
“The only possible reason to accuse me in public and [them] in private is so she could get money,’’ Dershowitz said.
Edwards and his co-counsel in the Crime Victims’ lawsuit, University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell, sued Dershowitz for defamation and Dershowitz
countersued in 2015. The case was settled out of court, with Dershowitz saying he had been vindicated.
Dershowitz said he received a massage at Epstein’s Palm Beach home only once — but that it was just a regular, therapeutic massage by a masseuse — not
by Roberts or anyone underage. Dershowitz’s wife was there at Epstein’s house at the time, Dershowitz said in the deposition taken for the case in 2015.
“I never had any knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein having any contact with any underage women — ever,’’ Dershowitz told the Herald.
Edwards and Cassell admitted making a “tactical mistake” in filing the accusations against Dershowitz as part of a lawsuit not involving him. But they
emphasized that the settlement had no bearing on the veracity of Roberts’ allegations.
The judge for the Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit agreed that the affidavit was misplaced in that case, and it was dropped.
Prince Andrew’s spokesman at Buckingham Palace did not respond to an email requesting comment.
Roberts, now 35, said it has taken her a long time to stand up to Epstein. She and 20 other victims received settlements from Epstein, ranging from
$50,000 to more than $1 million. The exact amounts have been kept confidential.
“It takes so long until you are able to speak about it. It took me having a daughter and looking at this young, beautiful innocent baby to say I want to speak
out about it now. I’m hoping that this will bring out more girls so that they say, Me Too.’’
The state court hearing
The judge at Epstein’s sentencing hearing at the Palm Beach County Courthouse knew very little about Epstein’s crimes. The sentencing paperwork was
restricted to Epstein’s specific charges: one count of solicitation of prostitution and one count of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 10 of 18
Page 9 of 17
“Are there more than one victim?’’ Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo asked the prosecutor at Epstein’s sentencing on June 30, 2008.
“There’s several,’’ replied assistant state prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek.
“Are all the victims in both of these cases in agreement with the terms of this plea?’‘ Pucillo later asked.
“Yes,’‘ Belohlavek replied, telling the judge that she had spoken to “several” of Epstein’s victims.
Emails show that federal prosecutors didn’t want the judge to know how many victims and accomplices there were.
Federal prosecutor A. Marie Villafaña — in a September 2007 email to Epstein lawyer Jay Lefkowitz — said: “I will mention co-conspirators but I would
prefer not to highlight for the judge all the other crimes and all the other persons that we could charge.’’
Attorney Spencer Kuvin happened to be in court that day because he’d heard Epstein was to appear, but Kuvin didn’t know why. He figured he’d use it as
an opportunity to serve Epstein with civil court papers involving one of several victims he represented. Instead, he listened to what was happening and
couldn’t believe that no one had contacted him or his clients.
“I was shocked to learn that the proceeding involved my client’s case and there was nothing I could do except watch as they disposed of her case without
ever telling her,’’ Kuvin said.
At the hearing, Belohlavek and Epstein’s attorney, Goldberger, were in sync, the court transcript shows. Epstein would be required to register as a sex
offender, but his probation would not be served under the strict requirements of sex offender probation.
Jeffrey Epstein is a registered sex offender in New York State and Florida. Emily Michot EMICHOT@MIAMIHERALD.COM
The judge didn’t question those provisions, but she did ask why Epstein was going to serve his sentence in the Palm Beach County stockade instead of in a
Florida state prison, like most sex offenders.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 10 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 11 of 18
After he pleaded guilty in state court, Jeffrey Epstein was assigned to a private section of the Palm Beach County stockade. Soon, however, he was allowed to leave the
compound six days a week, 12 hours a day, for what was termed work release. Emily Michot EMICHOT@MIAMIHERALD.COM
“We just decided that was the best way to accomplish what needed to be done here and the parties agreed that that sentence satisfied everyone’s
requirements,’’ Goldberger replied.
Said Judge Pucillo: “The taxpayers of Palm Beach County are going to pay 18 months to house this guy instead of DOC [the Department of Corrections]?”
Belohlavek: “Right.’’
Pucillo did not respond to a request for comment on the case.
Villafaña, the lead federal prosecutor in Epstein’s case, was in the courtroom, but there’s no indication she objected to Epstein’s cozier jail
accommodations.
When he entered jail in July 2008, Epstein was arguably the most well-known inmate there. Records also show that Epstein hired Palm Beach sheriff’s
deputies for his security details, paying them for the hours they spent monitoring him on work release at his West Palm Beach office, where he often
stayed until 10 p.m., jail logs show.
The Herald reviewed their time sheets, showing that the deputies logged visitors coming and going to and from his office throughout the day. A record log
of his visitors was kept in a safe, but the log no longer exists, according to a spokeswoman for the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office.
One deputy who often worked Epstein’s detail said that his assignment was to stay in a front reception room of Epstein’s office. Epstein was in a separate
office — with the door closed — most of the day as he accepted visitors, both male and female, the deputies’ logs show.
“It was not our job to monitor what he was doing in that office,’’ the deputy,
now retired, told the Herald.
In their early reports in July 2008, the deputies referred to Epstein as
“inmate’’ but within a few weeks the language had changed and he was
called a “client.” He was occasionally allowed to take a break for lunch by
sitting outside in a park, the records show, and they also gave him
permission to scout for a new office. While on work release, he was required
to wear an ankle bracelet to monitor his whereabouts.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 11 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 12 of 18
The work release was approved by the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office,
said spokeswoman Therese Barbera.
“Jeffrey Epstein, while in custody, met the criteria for the Work Release
Program,’’ Barbera wrote in an email. “There was no factual basis to deny
Mr. Epstein the same availability of this program that is offered to other
inmates under similar circumstances. Mr. Epstein was closely monitored
and there were no problems encountered during his time in the program.”
But the sheriff’s own work release policy — a copy of which Barbera provided
to the Herald — specifically notes that sex offenders aren’t eligible for work
While officially confined to the Palm Beach County stockade, serving time for his sex
release.
offenses, Jeffrey Epstein was allowed to spend half his day at this West Palm Beach
office building. It was called work release, although Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office rules
At first, Barbera questioned whether Epstein was a sex offender at all, noting prohibit work-release status for sexual offenders. Emily Michot
that he didn’t have to register officially until after his release from the jail in EMICHOT@MIAMIHERALD.COM
2009. But his court papers clearly listed him as a sex offender. In fact, the papers Epstein signed — obtained by the Herald — included all the laws
governing registered sex offenders in Florida.
Barbera refused to explain why Epstein was seemingly allowed to deviate from the agency’s policies. She also would not respond to requests for an
accounting of the amount of money that Epstein paid the sheriff’s office for his private details.
Palm Beach Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, who has been in office since 2004 — and is widely considered to be one of the most powerful people in the county — did
not respond to requests for comment.
A spokeswoman for Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric Bradshaw declined to say why Jeffrey Epstein was allowed work-release status despite rules prohibiting work release for sex
offenders. Taylor Jones PALM BEACH POST
Epstein’s registration requirements are somewhat confusing, even to those who are responsible for keeping his registration. The Florida Department of
Law Enforcement, which keeps the online registry, and the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office, where Epstein has to register in person twice a year, gave
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 12 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 13 of 18
conflicting explanations over the past six months about who is responsible for ensuring that he is complying with the law.
On Nov. 14, the Herald asked the sheriff’s office for a full accounting of Epstein’s check-ins for 2018. The record the office supplied two days later showed
he registered in January and in July — as required. But PBSO also inexplicably had him registering on Nov. 14 — the very same day that the Herald asked
for the records from the sheriff’s office.
When asked about this sudden registration, Barbera replied: “The information we provided you was a snapshot from the FDLE website. Perhaps,
someone from FDLE can provide a reason for you.’’
Said FDLE spokeswoman Gretl Plessinger in an email: “The screenshot is not on the public registry. This is information inputted by the local agency when
the offender comes into the local sheriff’s office to register.’’
Plessinger said Epstein is not covered by the state’s new three-day rule, which requires sex offenders to re-register when they come to stay in Florida for
three days or more. His town of Palm Beach home is already on file, as a temporary residence, she said.
So it’s not clear why he would have suddenly registered a third time on Nov. 14.
State Sen. Lauren Book, a child sex abuse survivor and vocal advocate for tough sex offender monitoring, called the case an appalling example of how
those in the justice system allow wealthy people to skirt the law and bend the rules.
“These prosecutors, and judges and sheriffs who are making these decisions and allowing things to fly — we have to hold these people accountable. They
are supposed to uphold the law — regardless of who a person is and how much money they have in the bank or who they had on their airplane.’’
Piece by piece
Over the years, Courtney Wild, Virginia Roberts and more than a dozen other women who say they were victims of Epstein have been quietly challenging
the traditional legal norms that have failed to punish Epstein and other men in positions of power for sexual abuse.
Epstein has paid millions of dollars in civil compensation that, for the most part, has kept the details about his operation out of the public eye. As a result,
much — but not all — of the testimony and evidence collected as part of the vast litigation has been sealed or redacted from public court records.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 13 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 14 of 18
The girls who were abused by Jeffrey Epstein and the cops who championed their cause remain angry over what they regard as a gross injustice, while
Epstein's employees and those who engineered his non-prosecution agreement have prospered.
By
Taking a page from Epstein’s legal team, lawyers representing Epstein’s victims hired private investigators and former police detectives to dig into
Epstein’s life. Over the past decade, they’ve tracked down hundreds of people, including dozens of other potential victims; they’ve interviewed Epstein’s
recruiters, bookkeepers, housekeepers, butlers, pilots and drivers. They’ve traveled around the country and the world, taking statements and sworn
depositions, coaxing people to talk who had previously been too reticent to come forward.
In short, they did what criminal prosecutors didn’t do.
Some of the information they’ve learned was given to federal authorities in New York. Edwards said those authorities have shown no interest in opening a
new investigation focused on crimes he is alleged to have committed in that state, where he is listed as a level 3 sex offender, the most dangerous
category, considered at risk to re-offend, records show. In New York, he has to register every 90 days.
Virginia Roberts holds a photo of herself at age 16, when she says Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein began abusing her sexually. Emily Michot
EMICHOT@MIAMIHERALD.COM
Holding abusers accountable
In 2015, Roberts sued Maxwell for defamation in New York after Maxwell called her a liar in a news interview. The civil lawsuit was an effort by Roberts
not just to clear her name, but an attempt to prove that Epstein and Maxwell operated an international underage sex trafficking operation. The lawsuit
was settled out of court in 2017 and nearly all the evidence presented in the case has been sealed.
Roberts’ attorney, Sigrid McCawley, claims that Roberts received a sizable settlement, although the amount is confidential.
“She wanted to hold her abusers accountable and we were able to do that by bringing this case … which we ultimately settled very successfully for her,’’
said McCawley, an associate of noted Bush-Gore recount lawyer David Boies, who has also pursued cases against Epstein in federal court in New York.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 14 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 15 of 18
Maxwell’s lawyer, Laura Menninger, declined to comment, referring the Herald to the court history.
“[Roberts] fabricated a story of abuse at the hands of Ms. Maxwell in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars from British tabloids with a motive
for selling papers and advertisements and without regard for truth, veracity or substantiation,’’ Menninger noted in a 2016 response filed in the case.
In February, the Miami Herald filed a federal court motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking access to documents that were sealed in the
Maxwell case. The motion, which was not opposed by Roberts, could have cast light on the full scope of Epstein’s possible sex trafficking operation, who
was involved and whether it was covered up. Maxwell has opposed the Herald’s motion, which was denied in August.
The Herald is appealing.
Today, Epstein has a new private jet, which takes him around the world. Flight records show that he spends most of his time on his private island, Little St.
James in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which he now lists as his permanent residence. He is registered in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands as a sex offender.
New Mexico, where he owns a sprawling ranch, does not list him as a convicted sex offender.
As part of its investigation, the Herald learned that in 2013, the federal government conceded that it had given Epstein what it called “valuable
consideration” for information he provided to the FBI as part of his plea deal. The documents do not elaborate, but Epstein — a hedge fund manager who
once worked for the investment firm Bear Stearns — was listed as a key investor who lost money in the financial crash of 2008.
Francey Hakes, a former federal child sex crimes prosecutor, said any consideration the government gave to Epstein should be made public.
“The public has a right to know why he got a slap on the wrist, and what was the interest that was so great that allowed him to not get prosecuted?”
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 15 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 16 of 18
Nadia Marcinkova, now a professional pilot, worked for Jeffrey Epstein when he was molesting young women. Victims told police Marcinkova would participate in sex acts,
often as Epstein choreographed every move. Jerod Harris
In recent years, Epstein has been traveling the world in his new Gulfstream V jet. He has been active in various charitable causes and scientific research
projects. The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, based in the U.S. Virgin Islands, has helped fund NeuroTV, an online network that features interviews with
academics and scientists.
Then and now
Both Nadia Marcinkova and Sarah Kellen changed their names after the scandal.
Marcinkova, 32, briefly became Marcinko. She visited Epstein more than 70 times when he was in Palm Beach custody. She went on to a career in real
estate. And she is now an FAA-certified commercial pilot and flight instructor who goes by the name “Global Girl’’ on social media.
(www.facebook.com/GlobalGirlAviation/)
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 16 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 17 of 18
Sarah Kellen, who used the name Kensington for a while, is now married to NASCAR driver Brian Vickers. The couple divides their time between homes
in North Carolina, New York and Miami Beach.
NASCAR driver Brian Vickers and his wife, Sarah, take part in pre-race ceremonies in Sparta, Ky., on June 28, 2014. She was known as Sarah Kellen when she was an aide to
Jeffrey Epstein. According to police, she scheduled visits of underage girls to Epstein’s Palm Beach estate for massages that turned sexual. She was not charged with a crime. Will
Schneekloth GETTY IMAGES
Maxwell, 56, transformed herself into an internationally known environmentalist. In 2012, she founded the TerraMar Project, a nonprofit environmental
group that works to protect the world’s oceans. In 2013, she gave a TED Talk on ocean conservation, discussing her diving expeditions around the world.
Dershowitz, 80, continues to lecture around the country. A professor
emeritus at Harvard Law School, Dershowitz has been a frequent
commenter on cable TV programs, often defending President Trump.
Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, 58, remained friends with Epstein, and in
2010, a photograph was taken of the two of them strolling in Manhattan. It
was later revealed that Epstein had loaned the prince’s ex-wife, Sarah
Ferguson, $24,000 to pay off some debts. Ferguson later called the loan a
“gigantic error of judgment.”
Plain human beings
Crime victims’ rights advocates have used the Epstein case to strengthen the
federal law in recent years, adding more precise language mandating that
prosecutors notify victims about plea bargains and allow victims to be heard
at sentencing.
Because some statute-of-limitation laws set deadlines for filing civil and
criminal sex crime cases, it’s difficult to bring them years later, said Marci
Hamilton, a University of Pennsylvania professor who is working to ease

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article219494920.html
4/3/2019
Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald
Page 17 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 18 of 18
those restrictions across the country.
Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of a British press magnate and Jeffrey Epstein’s close
associate when he was inviting underage girls into his bedroom, leads a TED Talk on
environmental issues.
But she points out that there has been no statute of limitations for federal sex crimes involving children since 2002.
Children who are sexually abused often take decades to reveal what happened to them, in part because their brains aren’t wired at a young age to
understand the trauma they’ve experienced, said Kenneth V. Lanning, a retired FBI agent who investigated and studied child sex crimes for 40 years.
“We want to hold children to some superhuman standard because they behave this way. In reality, police, prosecutors and judges have to understand that
children are not all angels from heaven. They are just plain human beings who are emotionally immature so we have to protect them from their own
decisions.’’
Wild, who continues to fight her federal case on behalf of all of Epstein’s victims, said she hopes that the federal judge hearing the Crime Victims’ Rights
case will make a ruling soon, one that will send a message to prosecutors who fail to consider the rights of crime victims.
“Really if you think about this too hard, it’s scary because this is our government that is supposed to protect us but has done everything to protect a
pedophile,’’ she said.
Support investigative journalism
The Miami Herald obtained thousands of FBI and court records, lawsuits, and witness depositions, and went to federal court in New York to access sealed documents in the reporting of ""Perversion of
Justice."" The Herald also tracked down more than 60 women who said they were victims, some of whom had never spoken of the abuse before.
Your digital subscription, starting at $0.99 for the first month, supports investigative journalism like this.
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-2 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 2
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-2 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 4
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/letter-editor-alan-dershowitz-responds-raw-story-report/
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-2 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 4
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/letter-editor-alan-dershowitz-responds-raw-story-report/
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-2 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/letter-editor-alan-dershowitz-responds-raw-story-report/
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-3 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT 3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-3 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 3
Alan Dershowitz: ‘I never had sex with Virginia Roberts’ | Miami
Herald
miamiherald.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article222532470.html
In its series on the Jeffrey Epstein case, “Perversion of Justice,” the Herald quotes an
affidavit by Virginia Roberts — a woman I never met — claiming she had sex with me on
Epstein’s island, ranch, plane and mansion. It then simply says I “denied” it.
In fact, I disproved it. I produced my travel, phone, credit card and TV appearance
records, conclusively proving that I could not have been and was not in any of these
places during the time Roberts knew Epstein. The former FBI director, assisted by a
former assistant U.S. attorney and a chief federal marshal, reviewed these records and
the other evidence and concluded that, “The totality of the evidence found during the
investigation refutes the allegations.”
There is other evidence, currently under seal, that directly establishes my innocence. I am
seeking to unseal emails between Roberts and a journalist, a book manuscript by Roberts
and a legal brief that are smoking guns showing that I was “deliberately framed for
financial reasons.”
ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads
There is also irrefutable evidence that Roberts lied about other people for money. She
told a British tabloid that she met Al and Tipper Gore on Epstein’s island and swore that
she had dinner with Bill Clinton on the island. But Secret Service records prove that none
of these people were on the island. Indeed, the Gores didn’t even know Epstein.
Get six months of free digital access to the Miami Herald
I have a tape recording of a conversation with Roberts’ closest friend in which she says
that Roberts told her she “felt pressure to go after [Dershowitz]” in order to obtain
money from a wealthy businessman, and that Roberts had never previously included me
among the people with whom she claimed to have had sex.
Finally, one of Roberts’ own lawyers has acknowledged in front of witnesses that her
claims against me are “wrong” “simply wrong.”
The evidence of my innocence is indisputable: I never met Roberts; I never had sex with
her; she simply made up the entire story for money.
Roberts made her false claims against me in court documents that immunize her from
being sued for defamation. I challenge her to repeat her false accusations out of court,
so that I can sue her for defamation and let a jury decide — after seeing all the evidence,
1/2
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-3 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 3
including the suppressed emails and book manuscript — who is telling the truth and who
is lying.
2/2
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-4 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 4
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dershowitz-goes-off-on-woman-who-made-underage-...
4/3/2019
Dershowitz Goes Off on Woman Who Made Underage Sex Allegations: 'She Should Be ...
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-4 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 4
Page 1 of 3
Dershowitz Goes Off on Woman Who Made Underage Sex
Allegations: ‘She Should Be Seriously Punished’
by Ronn Blitzer | 2:26 pm, December 4th, 2018
Tweet
Share
� � 00:34 10:57 � � �
Just hours after convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein agreed to settle
a civil case brought against him by attorney Bradley
Edwards, Epstein’s lawyer from his past criminal case, Alan
Dershowitz, discussed his former client on the Law&Crime Network.
Epstein was accused of trafficking more than 40 underage girls for
sex, and one such girl claimed Dershowitz himself had sex with her
when she was underage.
Dershowitz vehemently denies the claim, telling host Brian Ross that
accuser Virginia Roberts is a “certified, complete, total liar,” and that
her allegations are a “complete and total fabrication.” He also added
that she should be punished by the law for what she did.
The Harvard Law Professor Emeritus noted that Roberts’ allegations
were eventually withdrawn, and that the FBI recognized the
evidence showed he was not where she said he was. He pointed to
documented evidence that proves he is innocent.
“I can prove conclusively that she made the whole thing up,”
Dershowitz said, citing travel records that he says prove where he
was at the time she claims she had sex with him. “It’s conclusive,
conclusive evidence.”
“More importantly, I can prove where I wasn’t,” he said, after stating
outright, “Never met her, don’t know who she is, never heard of her.”
Similarly, Dershowitz said that Roberts claimed that notable figures
such as Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore were present on an
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dershowitz-goes-off-on-woman-who-made-underage-...
4/3/2019
Dershowitz Goes Off on Woman Who Made Underage Sex Allegations: 'She Should Be ...
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-4 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 4
Page 2 of 3
island, when Secret Service records proved they were never even
there.
Dershowitz said Roberts’ allegations were part of an extortion plot,
and that she “should be seriously punished for submitting false
information and a false affidavit.”
The attorney emphasized that Roberts has not been willing to repeat
her allegations against him in public, and that she has only accused
him in the context of litigation, which affords certain protections.
Advertisement
“She simply hides behind litigation privileges,” Dershowitz said,
encouraging Ross to call Roberts and see if she would repeat her
claims. “And if she does, I will be in court the next day suing her for
defamation and I will win the case ’cause I can prove conclusively
that she made up the whole story from top to bottom.”
Ross then turned to the controversial deal that Epstein received from
federal prosecutors who were investigating the trafficking case
against him. Federal prosecutors agreed not to prosecute him, and let
him plead guilty to state charges that resulted in a 13-month prison
sentence that allowed Epstein to leave prison during the day for
work. Federal prosecutors allegedly did not even inform victims
before making the deal, which is now the subject of a request for an
Inspector General investigation. Congressional Democrats said in a
letter that they want to know more about the circumstances
surrounding the deal, which was made by then-U.S. Attorney and
current Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta.
As Epstein’s defense attorney in that case, Dershowitz is not upset
about it the deal at all.
“I’m very proud of that deal, that’s what lawyers are supposed to do,”
he said. “Lawyers are supposed to get the best deals they can.” If he
could have gotten 10 months or no time at all, that would have been
even better, he said.
Acosta said in the past that Epstein’s lawyers, including Dershowitz,
put pressure on his office by investigating his staff. Dershowitz has
denied this.
“Acosta was very tough,” Dershowitz said, contrary to concerns that
he did anything improper. Dershowitz pointed out that the problem
feds had was proving that girls were transported in interstate
commerce.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dershowitz-goes-off-on-woman-who-made-underage-...
4/3/2019
Dershowitz Goes Off on Woman Who Made Underage Sex Allegations: 'She Should Be ...
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-4 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4
Page 3 of 3
“Unless you can prove that, you don’t have a federal case, only a state
case.”
[Image via Law & Crime Network screengrab]
Follow Law & Crime
filed under
Alan Dershowitz, Jefrey Epstein
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-5 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT 5
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-5 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-5 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-6 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 6
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-6 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 2
https://twitter.com/AlanDersh
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-7 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 7
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-7 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 16
EXHIBIT 8
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
Society
The Talented Mr. Epstein
Lately, Jeffrey Epstein’s high-flying style has been drawing oohs and aahs: the bachelor
financier lives in New York’s largest private residence, claims to take only billionaires as clients,
and flies celebrities including Bill Clinton and Kevin Spacey on his Boeing 727. But pierce his
air of mystery and the picture changes. Vicky Ward explores Epstein’s investment career, his ties
to retail magnate Leslie Wexner, and his complicated past.
by
�
Vicky Ward
June 27, 2011 12:00 am
On Manhattan’s Upper East Side, home to some of the most expensive real estate on earth, exists
the crown jewel of the city’s residential town houses. With its 15-foot-high oak door, huge
arched windows, and nine floors, it sits on—or, rather, commands—the block of 71st Street
between Fifth and Madison Avenues. Almost ludicrously out of proportion with its four- and
five-story neighbors, it seems more like an institution than a house. This is perhaps not
surprising—until 1989 it was the Birch Wathen private school. Now it is said to be Manhattan’s
largest private residence.
Inside, amid the flurry of menservants attired in sober black suits and pristine white gloves, you
feel you have stumbled into someone’s private Xanadu. This is no mere rich person’s home, but
a high-walled, eclectic, imperious fantasy that seems to have no boundaries.
The entrance hall is decorated not with paintings but with row upon row of individually framed
eyeballs; these, the owner tells people with relish, were imported from England, where they were
made for injured soldiers. Next comes a marble foyer, which does have a painting, in the manner
of Jean Dubuffet … but the host coyly refuses to tell visitors who painted it. In any case, guests
are like pygmies next to the nearby twice-life-size sculpture of a naked African warrior.
Despite its eccentricity the house is curiously impersonal, the statement of someone who wants
to be known for the scale of his possessions. Its occupant, financier Jeffrey Epstein, 50, admits to
friends that he likes it when people think of him this way. A good-looking man, resembling
Ralph Lauren, with thick gray-white hair and a weathered face, he usually dresses in jeans, knit
shirts, and loafers. He tells people he bought the house because he knew he “could never live
anywhere bigger.” He thinks 51,000 square feet is an appropriately large space for someone like
himself, who deals mostly in large concepts—especially large sums of money.
Guests are invited to lunch or dinner at the town house—Epstein usually refers to the former as
“tea,” since he likes to eat bite-size morsels and drink copious quantities of Earl Grey. (He does
not touch alcohol or tobacco.) Tea is served in the “leather room,” so called because of the
cordovan-colored fabric on the walls. The chairs are covered in a leopard print, and on the wall
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
hangs a huge, Oriental fantasy of a woman holding an opium pipe and caressing a snarling
lionskin. Under her gaze, plates of finger sandwiches are delivered to Epstein and guests by the
menservants in white gloves.
Upstairs, to the right of a spiral staircase, is the “office,” an enormous gallery spanning the width
of the house. Strangely, it holds no computer. Computers belong in the “computer room” (a
smaller room at the back of the house), Epstein has been known to say. The office features a
gilded desk (which Epstein tells people belonged to banker J. P. Morgan), 18th-century black
lacquered Portuguese cabinets, and a nine-foot ebony Steinway “D” grand. On the desk, a
paperback copy of the Marquis de Sade’s The Misfortunes of Virtue was recently spotted.
Covering the floor, Epstein has explained, “is the largest Persian rug you’ll ever see in a private
home—so big, it must have come from a mosque.” Amid such splendor, much of which reflects
the work of the French decorator Alberto Pinto, who has worked for Jacques Chirac and the
royal families of Jordan and Saudi Arabia, there is one particularly startling oddity: a stuffed
black poodle, standing atop the grand piano. “No decorator would ever tell you to do that,”
Epstein brags to visitors. “But I want people to think what it means to stuff a dog.” People can’t
help but feel it’s Epstein’s way of saying that he always has the last word.
ADVERTISEMENT
In addition to the town house, Epstein lives in what is reputed to be the largest private dwelling
in New Mexico, on an $18 million, 7,500-acre ranch which he named “Zorro.” “It makes the
town house look like a shack,” Epstein has said. He also owns Little St. James, a 70-acre island
in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where the main house is currently being renovated by Edward Tuttle,
a designer of the Amanresorts. There is also a $6.8 million house in Palm Beach, Florida, and a
fleet of aircraft: a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a Boeing 727, replete with trading room, on
which Epstein recently flew President Clinton, actors Chris Tucker and Kevin Spacey,
supermarket magnate Ron Burkle, Lew Wasserman’s grandson, Casey Wasserman, and a few
others, on a mission to explore the problems of AIDS and economic development in Africa.
Epstein is charming, but he doesn’t let the charm slip into his eyes. They are steely and
calculating, giving some hint at the steady whir of machinery running behind them. “Let’s play
chess,” he said to me, after refusing to give an interview for this article. “You be white. You get
the first move.” It was an appropriate metaphor for a man who seems to feel he can win no
matter what the advantage of the other side. His advantage is that no one really seems to know
him or his history completely or what his arsenal actually consists of. He has carefully
engineered it so that he remains one of the few truly baffling mysteries among New York’s
moneyed world. People know snippets, but few know the whole.
“He’s very enigmatic,” says Rosa Monckton, the former C.E.O. of Tiffany & Co. in the U.K. and
a close friend since the early 1980s. “You think you know him and then you peel off another ring
of the onion skin and there’s something else extraordinary underneath. He never reveals his
hand…. He’s a classic iceberg. What you see is not what you get.”
Even acquaintances sense a curious dichotomy: Yes, he lives like a “modern maharaja,” as Leah
Kleman, one of his art dealers, puts it. Yet he is fastidiously, almost obsessively private—he lists
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
himself in the phone book under a pseudonym. He rarely attends society gatherings or weddings
or funerals; he considers eating in restaurants like “eating on the subway”—i.e., something he’d
never do. There are many women in his life, mostly young, but there is no one of them to whom
he has been able to commit. He describes his most public companion of the last decade,
Ghislaine Maxwell, 41, the daughter of the late, disgraced media baron Robert Maxwell, as
simply his “best friend.” He says she is not on his payroll, but she seems to organize much of his
life—recently she was making telephone inquiries to find a California-based yoga instructor for
him. (Epstein is still close to his two other long-term girlfriends, Paula Heil Fisher, a former
associate of his at the brokerage firm Bear Stearns and now an opera producer, and Eva
Andersson Dubin, a doctor and onetime model. He tells people that when a relationship is over
the girlfriend “moves up, not down,” to friendship status.)
Some of the businessmen who dine with him at his home—they include newspaper publisher
Mort Zuckerman, banker Louis Ranieri, Revlon chairman Ronald Perelman, real-estate tycoon
Leon Black, former Microsoft executive Nathan Myhrvold, Tom Pritzker (of Hyatt Hotels), and
real-estate personality Donald Trump—sometimes seem not all that clear as to what he actually
does to earn his millions. Certainly, you won’t find Epstein’s transactions written about on
Bloomberg or talked about in the trading rooms. “The trading desks don’t seem to know him. It’s
unusual for animals that big not to leave any footprints in the snow,” says a high-level
investment manager.
ADVERTISEMENT
Unlike such fund managers as George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller, whose client lists and
stock maneuverings act as their calling cards, Epstein keeps all his deals and clients secret, bar
one client: billionaire Leslie Wexner, the respected chairman of Limited Brands. Epstein insists
that ever since he left Bear Stearns in 1981 he has managed money only for billionaires—who
depend on him for discretion. “I was the only person crazy enough, or arrogant enough, or
misplaced enough, to make my limit a billion dollars or more,” he tells people freely. According
to him, the flat fees he receives from his clients, combined with his skill at playing the currency
markets “with very large sums of money,” have afforded him the lifestyle he enjoys today.
Why do billionaires choose him as their trustee? Because the problems of the mega-rich, he tells
people, are different from yours and mine, and his unique philosophy is central to understanding
those problems: “Very few people need any more money when they have a billion dollars. The
key is not to have it do harm more than anything else…. You don’t want to lose your money.”
He has likened his job to that of an architect—more specifically, one who specializes in
remodeling: “I always describe [a billionaire] as someone who started out in a small home and as
he became wealthier had add-ons. He added on another addition, he built a room over the garage
… until you have a house that is usually a mess…. It’s a large house that has been put together
over time where no one could foretell the financial future and their accompanying needs.”
He makes it sound as though his job combines the roles of real-estate agent, accountant, lawyer,
money manager, trustee, and confidant. But, as with Jay Gatsby, myths and rumor swirl around
Epstein.
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 5 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
Here are some of the hard facts about Epstein—ones that he doesn’t mind people knowing: He
grew up middle-class in Brooklyn. His father worked for the city’s parks department. His parents
viewed education as “the way out” for him and his younger brother, Mark, now working in real
estate. Jeffrey started to play the piano—for which he maintains a passion—at five, and he went
to Brooklyn’s Lafayette High School. He was good at mathematics, and in his early 20s he got a
job teaching physics and math at Dalton, the elite Manhattan private school. While there he
began tutoring the son of Bear Stearns chairman Ace Greenberg and was friendly with a
daughter of Greenberg’s. Soon he went to Bear Stearns, where, under the mentorship of both
Greenberg and current Bear Stearns C.E.O. James Cayne, he did well enough to become a
limited partner—a rung beneath full partner. He abruptly departed in 1981 because, he has said,
he wanted to run his own business.
Thereafter the details recede into shadow. A few of the handful of current friends who have
known him since the early 1980s recall that he used to tell them he was a “bounty hunter,”
recovering lost or stolen money for the government or for very rich people. He has a license to
carry a firearm. For the last 15 years, he’s been running his business, J. Epstein & Co.
Since Leslie Wexner appeared in his life—Epstein has said this was in 1986; others say it was in
1989, at the earliest—he has gradually, in a way that has not generally made headlines, come to
be accepted by the Establishment. He’s a member of various commissions and councils: he is on
the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the New York Academy of
Sciences, and the Institute of International Education.
His current fan club extends to Cayne, Henry Rosovsky, the former dean of Harvard’s Faculty of
Arts and Sciences, and Larry Summers, Harvard’s current president. Harvard law professor Alan
Dershowitz says, “I’m on my 20th book…. The only person outside of my immediate family that
I send drafts to is Jeffrey.” Real-estate developer and philanthropist Marshall Rose, who has
worked with Epstein on projects in New Albany, Ohio, for Wexner, says, “He digests and
decodes the information very rapidly, which is to me terrific because we have shorter meetings.”
Also on the list of admirers are former senator George Mitchell and a gaggle of distinguished
scientists, most of whom Epstein has helped fund in recent years. They include Nobel Prize
winners Gerald Edelman and Murray Gell-Mann, and mathematical biologist Martin Nowak.
When these men describe Epstein, they talk about “energy” and “curiosity,” as well as a love for
theoretical physics that they don’t ordinarily find in laymen. Gell-Mann rather sweetly mentions
that “there are always pretty ladies around” when he goes to dinner chez Epstein, and he’s under
the impression that Epstein’s clients include the Queen of England. Both Nowak and Dershowitz
were thrilled to find themselves shaking the hand of a man named “Andrew” in Epstein’s house.
“Andrew” turned out to be Prince Andrew, who subsequently arranged to sit in the back of
Dershowitz’s law class.
Epstein gets annoyed when anyone suggests that Wexner “made him.” “I had really rich clients
before,” he has said. Yet he does not deny that he and Wexner have a special relationship.
Epstein sees it as a partnership of equals. “People have said it’s like we have one brain between
two of us: each has a side.”
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 6 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
“I think we both possess the skill of seeing patterns,” says Wexner. “But Jeffrey sees patterns in
politics and financial markets, and I see patterns in lifestyle and fashion trends. My skills are not
in investment strategy, and, as everyone who knows Jeffrey knows, his are not in fashion and
design. We frequently discuss world trends as each of us sees them.”
By the time Epstein met Wexner, the latter was a retail legend who had built a $3 billion
empire—one that now includes Victoria’s Secret, Express, and Bath & Body Works—from
$5,000 lent him by his aunt. “Wexner saw in Jeffrey the type of person who had the potential to
realize his [Jeffrey’s] dreams,” says someone who has worked closely with both men. “He gave
Jeffrey the ball, and Jeffrey hit it out of the park.”
Wexner, through a trust, bought the town house in which Epstein now lives for a reported $13.2
million in 1989. In 1993, Wexner married Abigail Koppel, a 31-year-old lawyer, and the
newlyweds relocated to Ohio; in 1996, Epstein moved into the town house. Public documents
suggest that the house is still owned by the trust that bought it, but Epstein has said that he now
owns the house.
Wexner trusts Epstein so completely that he has assigned him the power of fiduciary over all of
his private trusts and foundations, says a source close to Wexner. In 1992, Epstein even
persuaded Wexner to put him on the board of the Wexner Foundation in place of Wexner’s ailing
mother. Bella Wexner recovered and demanded to be reinstated. Epstein has said they settled by
splitting the foundation in two.
Epstein does not care that he comes between family members. In fact, he sees it as his job. He
tells people, “I am there to represent my client, and if my client needs protecting—sometimes
even from his own family—then it’s often better that people hate me, not the client.”
“You’ve probably heard I’m vicious in my representation of my clients,” he tells people proudly;
Leah Kleman describes his haggling over art prices as something like a scene out of the movie
Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome. Even a former mentor says he’s seen “the dark side” of
Epstein, and a Bear Stearns source recalls a meeting in which Epstein chewed out a team making
a presentation for Wexner as being so brutal as to be “irresponsible.”
One reporter, in fact, received three threats from Epstein while preparing a piece. They were
delivered in a jocular tone, but the message was clear: There will be trouble for your family if I
don’t like the article.
On the other hand, Epstein is clearly very generous with friends. Joe Pagano, an Aspen-based
venture capitalist, who has known Epstein since before his Bear Stearns days, can’t say enough
nice things: “I have a boy who’s dyslexic, and Jeffrey’s gotten close to him over the years….
Jeffrey got him into music. He bought him his first piano. And then as he got to school he had
difficulty … in studying … so Jeffrey got him interested in taking flying lessons.”
Rosa Monckton recalls Epstein telling her that her daughter, Domenica, who suffers from Down
syndrome, needed the sun, and that Rosa should feel free to bring her to his house in Palm Beach
anytime.
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 7 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
Some friends remember that in the late 80s Epstein would offer to upgrade the airline tickets of
good friends by affixing first-class stickers; the only problem was that the stickers turned out to
be unofficial. Sometimes the technique worked, but other times it didn’t, and the unwitting
recipients found themselves exiled to coach. (Epstein has claimed that he paid for the upgrades,
and had no knowledge of the stickers.) Many of those who benefited from Epstein’s largesse
claim that his generosity comes with no strings attached. “I never felt he wanted anything from
me in return,” says one old friend, who received a first-class upgrade.
Epstein is known about town as a man who loves women—lots of them, mostly young. Model
types have been heard saying they are full of gratitude to Epstein for flying them around, and he
is a familiar face to many of the Victoria’s Secret girls. One young woman recalls being
summoned by Ghislaine Maxwell to a concert at Epstein’s town house, where the women
seemed to outnumber the men by far. “These were not women you’d see at Upper East Side
dinners,” the woman recalls. “Many seemed foreign and dressed a little bizarrely.” This same
guest also attended a cocktail party thrown by Maxwell that Prince Andrew attended, which was
filled, she says, with young Russian models. “Some of the guests were horrified,” the woman
says.
“He’s reckless,” says a former business associate, “and he’s gotten more so. Money does that to
you. He’s breaking the oath he made to himself—that he would never do anything that would
expose him in the media. Right now, in the wake of the publicity following his trip with Clinton,
he must be in a very difficult place.”
According to S.E.C. and other legal documents unearthed by VANITY FAIR, Epstein may have
good reason to keep his past cloaked in secrecy: his real mentor, it might seem, was not Leslie
Wexner but Steven Jude Hoffenberg, 57, who, for a few months before the S.E.C. sued to freeze
his assets in 1993, was trying to buy the New York Post. He is currently incarcerated in the
Federal Medical Center in Devens, Massachusetts, serving a 20-year sentence for bilking
investors out of more than $450 million in one of the largest Ponzi schemes in American history.
When Epstein met Hoffenberg in London in the 1980s, the latter was the charismatic, audacious
head of the Towers Financial Corporation, a collection agency that was supposed to buy debts
that people owed to hospitals, banks, and phone companies. But Hoffenberg began using
company funds to pay off earlier investors and service a lavish lifestyle that included a mansion
on Long Island, homes on Manhattan’s Sutton Place and in Florida, and a fleet of cars and
planes.
Hoffenberg and Epstein had much in common. Both were smart and obsessed with making
money. Both were from Brooklyn. According to Hoffenberg, the two men were introduced by
Douglas Leese, a defense contractor. Epstein has said they were introduced by John Mitchell, the
late attorney general.
Epstein had been running International Assets Group Inc. (I.A.G.), a consulting company, out of
his apartment in the Solo building on East 66th Street in New York. Though he has claimed that
he managed money for billionaires only, in a 1989 deposition he testified that he spent 80
percent of his time assisting people recover stolen money from fraudulent brokers and lawyers.
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 8 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller
investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed
against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which
Epstein put into oil. In 1984 Stroll asked for his money back; four years later he had received
only $10,000. Stroll lost the suit, after Epstein claimed in court, among other things, that the
check for $10,000 was for a horse he’d bought from Stroll. “My net worth never exceeded four
and a half million dollars,” Stroll has said.
Hoffenberg, says a close friend, “really liked Jeffrey…. Jeffrey has a way of getting under your
skin, and he was under Hoffenberg’s.” Also appealing to Hoffenberg were Epstein’s social
connections; they included oil mogul Cece Wang (father of the designer Vera) and Mohan
Murjani, whose clothing company grew into Gloria Vanderbilt Jeans. Epstein lived large even
then. One friend recalls that when he took Canadian heiress Wendy Belzberg on a date he hired a
Rolls-Royce especially for the occasion. (Epstein has claimed he owned it.)
In 1987, Hoffenberg, according to sources, set Epstein up in the offices he still occupies in the
Villard House, on Madison Avenue, across a courtyard from the restaurant Le Cirque.
Hoffenberg hired his new protégé as a consultant at $25,000 a month, and the relationship
flourished. “They traveled everywhere together—on Hoffenberg’s plane, all around the world,
they were always together,” says a source. Hoffenberg has claimed that Epstein confided in him,
saying, for example, that he had left Bear Stearns in 1981 after he was discovered executing
“illegal operations.”
Several of Epstein’s Bear Stearns contemporaries recall that Epstein left the company very
suddenly. Within the company there were rumors also that he was involved in a technical
infringement, and it was thought that the executive committee asked that he resign after his two
supporters, Ace Greenberg and Jimmy Cayne, were outnumbered. Greenberg says he can’t recall
this; Cayne denies it happened, and Epstein has denied it as well. “Jeffrey Epstein left Bear
Stearns of his own volition,” says Cayne. “It was never suggested that he leave by any member
of management, and management never looked into any improprieties by him. Jeffrey said
specifically, ‘I don’t want to work for anybody else. I want to work for myself.’” Yet, this is not
the story that Epstein told to the S.E.C. in 1981 and to lawyers in a 1989 deposition involving a
civil business case in Philadelphia.
In 1981 the S.E.C.’s Jonathan Harris and Robert Blackburn took Epstein’s testimony and that of
other Bear Stearns employees in part of what became a protracted case about insider trading
around a tender offer placed on March 11, 1981, by the Seagram Company Ltd. for St. Joe
Minerals Corp. Ultimately several Italian and Swiss investors were found guilty, including
Italian financier Giuseppe Tome, who had used his relationship with Seagram owner Edgar
Bronfman Sr. to obtain information about the tender offer.
After the tender offer was announced, the S.E.C. began investigating trades involving St. Joe at
Bear Stearns and other firms. Epstein resigned from Bear Stearns on March 12. The S.E.C. was
tipped off that Epstein had information on insider trading at Bear Stearns, and it was therefore
obliged to question him. In his S.E.C. testimony, given on April 1, 1981, Epstein claimed that he
had found “offensive” the way Bear Stearns management had handled a disciplinary action
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 9 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
following its discovery that he had committed a possible “Reg D” violation—evidently he had
lent money to his closest friend. (In the 1989 deposition he said that he’d lent approximately
$20,000 to Warren Eisenstein, to buy stock.) Such an action could have been considered
improper, although Epstein claimed he had not realized this until afterward.
According to Epstein, Bear Stearns management had questioned him about the loan around
March 4. The questioners, Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and Alvin Einbender.
In his 1989 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter
was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender
again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense,
together with previous “carelessness” over expenses, and he would be fined $2,500.
“There was discussion whether, in fact, I had ever put in an airline ticket for someone else and
not myself and I said that it was possible, … since my secretary handles my expenses,” Epstein
told the S.E.C. In his 1989 testimony he stated that the “Reg D” incident had cost him a shot at
partnership that year.
What the S.E.C. seemed to be especially interested in was whether there was a connection
between Epstein’s leaving and the alleged insider trading in St. Joe Minerals by other people at
Bear Stearns:
Q: Sir, are you aware that certain rumors may have been circulating around your firm in
connection with your reasons for leaving the firm?
A: I’m aware that there were many rumors.
Q: What were the rumors you heard?
A: Nothing to do with St. Joe.
Q: Can you relate what you heard?
A: It was having to do with an illicit affair with a secretary.
Q: Have you heard any other rumors suggesting that you had made a presentation or
communication to the Executive Committee concerning alleged improprieties by other members
or employees of Bear Stearns?
A: I, in fact, have heard that rumor, but it’s been from Mr. Harris in our conversation last week.
Q: Have you heard it from anyone else?
A: No.
A little later the interview focuses on James Cayne:
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 10 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
Q: Did you ever hear while you were at Bear Stearns that Mr. Cayne may have trader or insider
information in connection with St. Joe Minerals Corporation?
Q: Did Mr. Cayne ever have any conversation with you about St. Joe Minerals?
Q: Did you happen to overhear any conversations between Mr. Cayne and anyone else regarding
St. Joe Minerals?
And still later in the questioning comes this exchange:
Q: Have you had any type of business dealings with Mr. Cayne?
A: There’s no relationship with Bear Stearns.
Q: Pardon?
A: Other than Bear Stearns, no.
Q: Have you been a participant in any type of business venture with Mr. Cayne?
Q: Do you have any expectation of participating in any business venture with Mr. Cayne?
Q: Have you had any business participations with Mr. Theram?
A: No; nor do I anticipate any.
Q: Mr. Epstein, did anyone at Bear Stearns tell you in words or substance that you should not
divulge anything about St. Joe Minerals to the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission?
Q: Has anyone indicated to you in any way, either directly or indirectly, in words or substance,
that your compensation for this past year or any future monies coming to you from Bear Stearns
will be contingent upon your not divulging information to the Securities and Exchange
Commission?
A: No.
Despite the circumstances of Epstein’s leaving, Bear Stearns agreed to pay him his annual
bonus—which he anticipated as being approximately $100,000.
The S.E.C. never brought any charges against anyone at Bear Stearns for insider trading in St.
Joe, but its questioning seems to indicate that it was skeptical of Epstein’s answers. Some
sources have wondered why, if he was such a big producer at Bear Stearns, he would have given
it up over a mere $2,500 fine.
Certainly the years after Epstein left the firm were not obviously prosperous ones. His luck
didn’t seem to change until he met Hoffenberg.
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 11 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
One of Epstein’s first assignments for Hoffenberg was to mastermind doomed bids to take over
Pan American World Airways in 1987 and Emery Air Freight Corp. in 1988. Hoffenberg
claimed in a 1993 hearing before a grand jury in Illinois that Epstein came up with the idea of
financing these bids through Towers’s acquisition of two ailing Illinois insurance companies,
Associated Life and United Fire. “He was hired by us to work on the securities side of the
insurance companies and Towers Financial, supposedly to make a profit for us and for the
companies,” Hoffenberg reportedly told the grand jury. He also alleged that Epstein was the
“technician,” executing the schemes, although, having no broker’s license, he had to rely on
others to make the trades. Much of Hoffenberg’s subsequent testimony in his criminal case has
proven to be false, and Epstein has claimed he was merely asked how the bids could be
accomplished and has said he had nothing to do with the financing of them. Yet Richard Allen,
the former treasurer of United Fire, recalls seeing Epstein two or three times at the company. He
and another executive say they had direct dealing with Epstein over the finances. And in his
deposition of 1989, Epstein stated that he was the one who executed “all” Hoffenberg’s
instructions to buy and sell the stock. He called it “making the orders.” He could not recall
whether he had chosen the brokers used.
To win approval from the Illinois insurance regulators for Towers’s acquisition of the
companies, Hoffenberg promised to inject $3 million of new capital into them. In fact, in his
grand-jury testimony Hoffenberg claimed that he, his chief operating officer, Mitchell Brater,
and Epstein came up with a scheme to steal $3 million of the insurance companies’ bonds to buy
Pan Am and Emery stock. “Jeffrey Epstein and Mitch Brater arranged the various brokerage
accounts for the bonds to be placed with in New York, and I think one in Chicago, Rodman &
Renshaw,” Hoffenberg reportedly said. Then, said Hoffenberg, while making it appear as though
they were investing the bonds in much safer financial instruments, they used them as collateral to
buy the stock. “Epstein was the person in charge of the transactions, and Mitchell Brater was
assisting him with it in coordination on behalf of the insurance companies’ money,” Hoffenberg
claimed at the time.
At one point, according to Hoffenberg, a broker forged the documents necessary for a $1.8
million check to be written on insurance-company funds. The check was used to buy more stock
in the takeover targets. Meanwhile, in order to throw the insurance regulators off, the $1.8
million was reported as being safely invested in a money-market account.
United Fire’s former chief financial officer Daniel Payton confirms part of Hoffenberg’s
account. He says he recalls making one or two telephone calls to Epstein (at Hoffenberg’s
direction) about the missing bonds. “He said, ‘Oh, yeah, they still exist.’ But we found out later
that he had sold those assets … leveraged them … [and] used some margin account to take some
positions in … Emery and Pan Am,” says Payton.
Epstein’s extraordinary creativity was, according to Hoffenberg, responsible for the purchase by
the insurance companies of a $500,000 bond, with no money down. “Epstein created a great
scheme to purchase a $500,000 treasury bond that would not be shown … [as] margined or
collateralized,” he reportedly told the grand jury. “It looked like it was free and clear but it
actually wasn’t,” he said.
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 12 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
Epstein has denied he ever had any dealings with anyone from the insurance companies. But
Richard Allen says he recalls talking to Epstein at Hoffenberg’s direction and telling him it was
urgent they retrieve the missing bonds for a state examination. According to Allen, Epstein said,
“We’ll get them back.” He had “kind of a flippant attitude,” says Allen. “They never came
back.”
Epstein, according to Hoffenberg, also came up with a scheme to manipulate the price of Emery
Freight stock in an attempt to minimize the losses that occurred when Hoffenberg’s bid went
wrong and the share price began to fall. This was alleged to have involved multiple clients’
accounts controlled by Epstein.
Eventually, in 1991, insurance regulators in Illinois sued Hoffenberg. He settled the case, and
Epstein, who was only a paid consultant, was never deposed or accused of any wrongdoing.
Barry Gross, the attorney who was handling the suit for the regulators, says of Epstein, “He was
very elusive…. It was hard to really track him down. There were a substantial number of checks
for significant dollars that were paid to him, I remember…. He was this character we never got a
handle on. Again we presumed that he was involved with the Pan Am and Emery run that
Hoffenberg made, but we never got a chance to depose him.”
“From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the
government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They
went for what they knew they could get … and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the
much larger and unrelated part of Hoffenberg’s fraud, based in New York State]…. What they
couldn’t get, they didn’t bother with.”
Another lawyer involved in the criminal prosecution of Hoffenberg says, “In a criminal
investigation like that, when there is a guilty plea, to be quick and dirty about it, discovery is
always incomplete…. They don’t have to line up witnesses; they don’t have to learn every fact
that might come out on cross-examination.”
Epstein was involved with Hoffenberg in other questionable transactions. Financial records show
that in 1988 Epstein invested $1.6 million in Riddell Sports Inc., a company that manufactures
football helmets. Among his co-investors were the theater mogul Robert Nederlander and
attorney Leonard Toboroff. A source close to this transaction claims that Epstein told
Nederlander and Toboroff that he had raised his share of the money from a Swiss banker, whose
identity they could not be allowed to know. But Hoffenberg has claimed the money came from
him, and Towers’s financial statements for that year show a loan to Epstein of $400,000.
(Epstein has said he can’t remember the details and has disputed the accuracy of the Towers
financial reports.)
Around the same time, Nederlander and Toboroff let Epstein come in with them on a scheme to
make money out of Pennwalt, a Pennsylvania chemical company. The plan was to group together
with two other parties to take a substantial declared position in the stock. According to a source,
Epstein was supposed to help Nederlander and Toboroff raise $15 million. He seemed to fail to
find other investors, say those familiar with the deal. (Epstein has said he was merely an
investor.) He invested $1 million, which he told his co-investors was his own money. But in his
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 13 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
1989 deposition he said that he put in only $300,000 of his own money. Where did the rest come
from? Hoffenberg has said it came from him, in a loan that Nederlander and Toboroff didn’t
know about.
Two things happened that alarmed Nederlander and Toboroff. After the group signaled a
possible takeover, the Pennwalt management threatened to sue the would-be raiders. Epstein was
reluctant initially to give a deposition about his share of the money, telling Toboroff there were
“reasons” he didn’t want to. Then, after the opportunity for new investors was closed, coinvestors
recall Epstein announcing that he’d found one at last: Dick Snyder, then C.E.O. of the
publisher Simon & Schuster, who wanted to put up approximately $500,000. (Neither Epstein
nor Snyder can now recall the investment. Yet in the 1989 deposition Epstein said that he had
recruited Snyder, whom he had met socially, into the deal.)
According to a source, Toboroff and Nederlander told Epstein that Snyder was too late, but,
without their realizing it, Hoffenberg has claimed, Snyder wrote a check to Hoffenberg and
bought out some of his investment. But then Snyder wanted out.
“Nederlander started to get these irate calls from [Snyder,] who wasn’t part of the deal, saying he
was owed all this money,” says someone close to the deal. Toboroff and Nederlander were
baffled.
Eventually, a source close to Hoffenberg says, Hoffenberg paid Snyder off.
Just as Nederlander and Toboroff were growing wary of Epstein, he became increasingly
involved with Leslie Wexner, whom he had met through insurance executive Robert Meister and
his late wife. Epstein has told people that he met Wexner in 1986 in Palm Beach, and that he
won his confidence by persuading him not to invest in the stock market, just as the 1987 crash
was approaching. His story has subsequently changed. When asked if Wexner knew about his
connection to Hoffenberg, Epstein said that he began working for Wexner in 1989, and that “it
was certainly not the same time.”
Wherever and whenever it was that Epstein and Wexner actually met, there was an immediate
and strong personal chemistry. Wexner says he thinks Epstein is “very smart with a combination
of excellent judgment and unusually high standards. Also, he is always a most loyal friend.”
Sources say Epstein proved that he could be useful to Wexner as well, with “fresh” ideas about
investments. “Wexner had a couple of bad investments, and Jeffrey cleaned those up right
away,” says a former associate of Epstein’s.
Before he signed on with Wexner, Epstein had several meetings with Harold Levin, then head of
Wexner Investments, in which he enunciated ideas about currencies that Levin found
incomprehensible. “In fact,” says someone who used to work very closely with Wexner, “almost
everyone at the Limited wondered who Epstein was; he literally came out of nowhere.”
“Everyone was mystified as to what his appeal was,” says Robert Morosky, a former vicechairman
of the Limited.
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 14 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
Much of Epstein’s work is related to cleaning up, tightening budgets, and efficiencies. One
person who worked for Wexner and who saw a contract drawn up between the two men says
Epstein is involved in “everything, not just a little here, a little there. Everything!” In addition, he
says, “Wexner likes having a hatchet man…. Whenever there is dirty work to be done he’d stick
Jeffrey on it…. He has a reputation for being ruthless but he gets the job done.”
Epstein has evidently been asked to fire personal-staff members when needed. “He was that
mysterious person that everyone was scared to death of,” says a former employee.
Meanwhile, he is also less than popular with some people outside Wexner’s company with
whom he now deals. “He ‘inserted’ himself into the construction process of Leslie Wexner’s
yacht…. That resulted in litigation down the road between Mr. Wexner and the shipyard that
eventually built the vessel,” says Lars Forsberg, a lawyer whose firm at the time, Dickerson and
Reily, was hired to deal with litigation stemming from the construction of Wexner’s Limitless—
at 315 feet, one of the largest private yachts in the world. Evidently, Epstein stalled on paying
Dickerson and Reily for its work. “It’s probably once or twice in my legal career that I’ve had to
sue a client for payment of services that he’d requested and we’d performed … without issue on
the performance,” says Forsberg. In the end the matter was settled, but Epstein claims he now
has no recollection of it.
The incident is one of a number of disputes Epstein has become embroiled in. Some are for sums
so tiny as to be baffling; for instance, Epstein sued investment adviser Herbert Glass, who sold
him the Palm Beach house in 1990, for $13,444—Epstein claimed this was owed him for
furnishings removed by Glass.
In 1998 the U.S. Attorney’s Office sued Epstein for illegally subletting the former home of the
deputy consul general of Iran to attorney Ivan Fisher and others. Epstein paid $15,000 a month in
rent to the State Department, but he charged Fisher and his colleagues $20,000. Though the exact
terms of the agreement are sealed, the court ruled against Epstein.
Wexner offers some insight into his friend’s combative style. “Many times people confuse
winning and losing,” Wexner says. “Jeffrey has the unusual quality of knowing when he is
winning. Whether in conversations or negotiations, he always stands back and lets the other
person determine the style and manner of the conversation or negotiation. And then he responds
in their style. Jeffrey sees it in chivalrous terms. He does not pick a fight, but if there is a fight,
he will let you choose your weapon.”
One case is rather more serious. Currently, Citibank is suing Epstein for defaulting on loans from
its private-banking arm for $20 million. Epstein claims that Citibank “fraudulently induced” him
into borrowing the money for investments. Citibank disputes this charge.
The legal papers for another case offer a rare window into Epstein’s finances. In 1995, Epstein
stopped paying rent to his landlord, the nonprofit Municipal Arts Society, for his office in the
Villard House. He claimed that they were breaking the terms of the lease by not letting his staff
in at night. The case was eventually settled. However, one of the papers filed in this dispute is
Epstein’s financial statement for 1988, in which he claimed to be worth $20 million. He listed
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 15 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
that he owned $7 million in securities, $1 million in cash, zero in residential property (although
he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach), and $11 million in other
assets, including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: “The company had
been bought with a huge amount of debt, and it wasn’t public, so it was meaningless to attach a
figure like that to it … the price it cost was about $1.2 million.” The co-investors bought out
Epstein’s share in Riddell in 1995 for approximately $3 million. At that time, when Epstein was
asked, as a routine matter, to sign a paper guaranteeing he had access to a few million dollars in
case of any subsequent disputes over the sale price, Wexner signed for him. Epstein has
explained that this was because the co-investors wanted an indemnity against being sued by
Wexner. One of the investors calls this “bullshit.”
Epstein’s appointment to the board of New York’s Rockefeller University in 2000 brought him
into greater social prominence. Boasting such social names as Nancy Kissinger, Brooke Astor,
and Robert Bass, the board also includes such pre-eminent scientists as Nobel laureate Joseph
Goldstein. “Epstein was thrilled to be elected,” says someone who knows him.
After one term Epstein resigned. According to New York magazine, this was because he didn’t
like to wear a suit to meetings. A spokesperson for the Rockefeller board says Epstein left
because he had insufficient time to commit; a board member recalls that he was “arrogant” and
“not a good fit.” The spokesperson admits that it is “infrequent” for board members not to be
renominated after only one term.
Still, the recent spate of publicity Epstein has inspired does not seem to have fazed him. In
November he was spotted in the front row of the Victoria’s Secret fashion show at New York’s
Lexington Avenue Armory; around the same time the usual coterie of friends and beautiful
women were whisked off to Little St. James (which he tells people has been renamed Little St.
Jeff) for a long weekend.
Thanks to Epstein’s introductions, says Martin Nowak, the biologist finds himself moving from
Princeton to Harvard, where he is assuming the joint position of professor of mathematics and
professor of biology. Epstein has pledged at least $25 million to Harvard to create the Epstein
Program for Mathematical Biology and Evolutionary Dynamics, and Epstein will have an office
at the university. The program will be dedicated to searching for nature’s algorithms, a pursuit
that is a specialty of Nowak’s. For Epstein this must be the summit of everything he has worked
toward: he has been seen proudly displaying Harvard president Larry Summers’s letter of
commitment as if he can’t quite believe it is real. He says he was reluctant to have his name
attached to the program, but Summers persuaded him. He rang his mentor Wexner about it, and
Wexner told him it was all right.
An insatiable, restless soul, always on the move, Epstein builds a tremendous amount of
downtime into his hectic work schedule. Yet there is something almost programmed about his
relaxation: it’s as if even pleasure has to be measured in terms of self-improvement. Nowak says
that, when he goes to stay with Epstein in the Caribbean, they’ll get up at six and, as the sun
rises, have three-hour conversations about theoretical physics. “Then he’ll go off and do some
work, re-appear, and we’ll talk some more.”
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-8 Filed 04/16/19 Page 16 of 16
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2003/03/jeffrey‐epstein‐200303
Another person who went to the island with Epstein, Maxwell, and several beautiful women
remembers that the women “sat around one night teasing him about the kinds of grasping women
who might want to date him. He was amused by the idea…. He’s like a king in his own world.”
Many people comment there is something innocent, almost childlike about Jeffrey Epstein. They
see this as refreshing, given the sophistication of his surroundings. Alan Dershowitz says that, as
he was getting to know Epstein, his wife asked him if he would still be close to him if Epstein
suddenly filed for bankruptcy. Dershowitz says he replied, “Absolutely. I would be as interested
in him as a friend if we had hamburgers on the boardwalk in Coney Island and talked about his
ideas.”
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-9 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 9
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-9 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 4
4/15/2019 Alan Dershowitz says he's still advising Jeffrey Epstein - Axios
Alan Dershowitz says he's still advising Jeffrey Epstein
Alan Dershowitz still provides legal advice to serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, he confirmed to Axios.
What he's saying: ""He has called me a couple of times about legal issues, because I'm still technically
his lawyer,"" Dershowitz told me in a phone interview on Saturday. ""But I haven't had any social, or any
other kind of contact. ... You never stop being a person's lawyer.""
Background: Dershowitz helped Epstein get a sweetheart plea deal from then-U.S. Attorney
Alexander Acosta (now Donald Trump's labor secretary and a rumored long-shot contender for attorney
general).
A bombshell Miami Herald investigative series last week highlighted for the first time the extent of
Epstein's alleged crimes and the soft treatment he received from federal prosecutors.
The Palm Beach multimillionaire would ""serve just 13 months in the county jail, but the deal —
called a non-prosecution agreement — essentially shut down an ongoing FBI probe into whether
there were more victims and other powerful people who took part in Epstein’s sex crimes,""
according to a Miami Herald examination of thousands of emails, court documents and FBI
records.
https://www.axios.com/alan-dershowitz-jeffrey-epstein-legal-advice-1a13ad59-a718-46c9-9813-11231604a387.html 1/3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-9 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 4
4/15/2019 Alan Dershowitz says he's still advising Jeffrey Epstein - Axios
Dozens of women alleged that Epstein molested and raped them when they were underaged using a
sophisticated human trafficking network. A civil trial is scheduled to begin on Tuesday in Palm Beach
County that may finally let these women tell their stories in court.
Behind the scenes: While he was allegedly raping teenage girls, Epstein cultivated cozy relationships
with America's elites.
Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's plane, nicknamed the ""Lolita Express,"" numerous times, according to
flight logs.
And Donald Trump, in a profile with New York magazine written several years before the police
caught up with Epstein, praised his friend as a ""terrific guy."" ""It is even said that he likes beautiful
women as much as I do,"" Trump said of Epstein, ""and many of them are on the younger side.""
Dershowitz was also friendly with Epstein before the broader public knew he was a pedophile.
Dershowitz confirmed to me that he received a massage at Epstein's Palm Beach home, adding
that the woman who provided it was of legal age.
""What happened was I, um, he lent us, this was well before any of this thing came out, he lent us
his house once. And I was there, my grandchildren were there, my daughter was there, and we all
got massages.""
""And, um, it was therapeutic. I had a therapeutic massage with an old old Russian, but I never
never ... and that was part of when we had his house for about a week during I think it was
Christmas vacation.""
""Believe me, if I had known that anything improper had ever taken place in that house, I never
would have allowed my children, my grandchildren, my wife, my daughter-in-law, my son, to have
spent time there. I can tell you categorically there were no inappropriate pictures, no
inappropriate anythings. It was like any other house.""
One of Epstein's accusers, Virginia Roberts, has claimed Dershowitz had sex with her when she was
underage. Dershowitz has denied the allegation and told the Miami Herald ""the story was 100 percent
flatly categorically made-up"" so ""she could get money.""
Go deeper: Trump defender Dershowitz shunned by Martha's Vineyard
https://www.axios.com/alan-dershowitz-jeffrey-epstein-legal-advice-1a13ad59-a718-46c9-9813-11231604a387.html 2/3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-9 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4
4/15/2019 Alan Dershowitz says he's still advising Jeffrey Epstein - Axios
SEXUAL ASSAULT
Show less
https://www.axios.com/alan-dershowitz-jeffrey-epstein-legal-advice-1a13ad59-a718-46c9-9813-11231604a387.html 3/3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-10 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT 10
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-10 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 3
4/9/2019 Opinion | Jeffrey Epstein’s Attorneys: A Fair Plea Deal - The New York Times
LETTER
Jeffrey Epstein’s
Attorneys: A Fair
Plea Deal
The attorneys for a man accused of sexual abuse of young women defend the
prosecutors’ decision to drop federal charges against him.
March 4, 2019
To the Editor:
Re “The Cowardly Labor Secretary” (editorial, March 3):
Your editorial’s conclusions are in profound conflict with the reality as we, Jeffrey Epstein’s
current and former lawyers, knew it.
When he was United States attorney for the Southern District of Florida in 2007, Alexander
Acosta, the current labor secretary, oversaw a plea deal for Mr. Epstein involving charges of
solicitation of prostitution involving young women. Your underlying premise is that Mr. Acosta
had capitulated and not filed federal charges because Mr. Epstein had a “high-priced defense
team.”
This was categorically denied by the Southern District’s then first assistant, Jeffrey H. Sloman, in
an Op-Ed article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman correctly represented the existence
of “significant legal impediments to [federally] prosecuting” what was a quintessentially state case.
He also correctly represented that the government had achieved its principal objectives — a felony
plea, incarceration, millions of dollars in restitution and monetary settlements, and lifetime sex
offender registration — through its agreement with Mr. Epstein. That agreement was reviewed at
multiple levels of the Justice Department. An agreement rather than a trial is how over 97
percent of federal cases get resolved, through negotiations by two teams of experienced
professionals. The case lacked the credible and compelling proof that is required by federal
criminal statutes.
That the guilty plea was required in a state, not federal, court reflected the absence of evidence
that Mr. Epstein used the internet, traveled to a location away from his home for the purpose of
having illegal sex, commercially trafficked women to others, engaged in force, fraud or coercion,
used drugs or alcohol to entice young women who came to his house to exchange sexual massages
for money, possessed child pornography or in other ways violated federal law.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/letters/jeffrey-epstein.html 1/2
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-10 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 3
The number of young women involved in the investigation has been vastly exaggerated, there was
no “international sex-trafficking operation” and there was never evidence that Mr. Epstein “hosted
sex parties” at his home.
4/9/2019 Opinion | Jeffrey Epstein’s Attorneys: A Fair Plea Deal - The New York Times
You have 3 free articles remaining.
Subscribe to The Times
Finally, Mr. Epstein has gone to prison and made enormous monetary settlements relying on his
negotiated agreement. He is entitled to finality like every other defendant.
Kenneth W. Starr
Martin G. Weinberg
Jack Goldberger
Lilly Ann Sanchez
A version of this article appears in print on March 5, 2019, on Page A26 of the New York edition with the headline: Jeffrey Epstein’s
Attorneys: A Fair Plea Deal
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/letters/jeffrey-epstein.html 2/2
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-11 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 11
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-11 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 4
4/8/2019 Prof. Dershowitz, Tell Me How You Really Feel | Law.com
Prof. Dershowitz, Tell Me How You
Really Feel
Harvard's legendary law professor chats with the Careerist about the recent sex allegations, his enemies and the
""cesspool.""
By Vivia Chen | January 15, 2015 at 06:19 PM | Originally published on The American Lawyer
(Alan Dershowitz)
Alan Dershowitz, arguably the most famous—and maybe infamous—law professor in the
land, wants to set the record straight. When he heard that I was writing about his
relationship with billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and the related allegation that Dershowitz
engaged in sex with a minor, he tracked me down to tell his side of the story.
The backdrop: Dershowitz was part of a legal team that had negotiated a plea deal in
2008 in which Epstein pleaded guilty to felony charges in Florida for soliciting prostitution
from a minor. Epstein served 13 months in prison but was spared federal charges under
the deal. Last December, lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassellfiled suit against
the U.S. government, arguing that the plea deal violated the rights of Epstein’s alleged
sex victims; the suit also alleges that Dershowitz had sex with one of the victims when
she was under age. Dershowitz has denied all the allegations, and Edwards and Cassell
have filed a defamation suit against Dershowitz for calling them liars.
The following are excerpts from my two phone conversations with Dershowitz:
From what I’ve read, your relationship with Epstein seemed chummy. You
socialized with him and you and your family stayed at his various homes. Isn’t it a
bad idea for a lawyer to be so close to a notorious client?
Let me tell you how I met him. I was introduced to him by Lady de Rothschild as an
academic colleague. He was friendly with Larry Summers . . . He was in the process of
contributing $50 million to Harvard for evolutionary biology.
So Epstein was friendly with all sorts of Harvard muckety-mucks.
https://www.law.com/almID/1202715316005/Prof-Dershowitz-Tell-Me-How-You-Really-Feel/?slreturn=20190308174659 1/3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-11 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 4
4/8/2019 Prof. Dershowitz, Tell Me How You Really Feel | Law.com
The fact that he was giving money didn’t hurt. We went to events that he was involved in
but none of us suspected that he had another side until later. Jeffrey loved academics.
My conversations with him were only about academic subjects. We never discussed
females or our social life.
Did your relationship change with Epstein when you took him on as a client?
Virtually all my social contact with him was of an academic nature, and it was prior to the
time he was indicted. My relationship with him was entirely professional. It is a total bum
rap to say that I “cavorted” with him or was “chummy” with him. I teach my students
never, never get too close to clients—and certainly don’t do anything improper with them.
The suit says that Jane Doe No. 3 was forced to have sex with you, Prince Andrew
and “many other powerful men,” including unnamed politicians, foreign presidents
and world leaders. Why were you and the Prince singled out by name?
They want to void the plea agreement and needed to find a lawyer who knew Epstein
before [the indictment], and had been on his island, his home in New Mexico, Palm
Beach. I fit the bill. It was lawyer profiling.
And the Prince?
They claimed that Prince Andrew was using his influence to get Epstein a better deal with
the government. What’s more laughable than suggesting that the U.S. Attorney would
listen to the Prince to go easy on Epstein!
Why bother responding if you think the allegations are so outrageous? Why not
just let the facts come out during the legal process?
I have to respond to everything. That’s the way I am. Imagine having an unblemished
personal life then reading graffiti scrawled on the bathroom door that gets picked up in
every paper based on the assertions of a woman who’s a serial liar.
Brad Edwards, one of the lawyers bringing this suit, has a history of legal
entanglement with Epstein, as does his former partner Scott Rothstein, who’s now
in prison for his role in a Ponzi scheme. But the other lawyer in this case, Paul
Cassell, is a former federal judge and a law professor. Why is he getting involved?
Everyone is shocked that he would be part of this. I think he’s always hated me because
I’m his opposite. I’m the conventional liberal he hates: I’m against the death penalty, I’m
pro abortion rights, pro gun control.
Seems risky to bring a lawsuit for just ideological differences.
No one can understand Cassell’s motive. Either he will be disbarred or I will be. And if I
knowingly had sex with a sex slave then I would deserve disbarment.
What about the reaction? Do you feel you’ve been treated fairly by the press and
the public?
I’ve been treated particularly harshly by lawyers and law professors. They are so quick to
say that I might be guilty. They’re getting too much pleasure out of this. There’s a dose of
schadenfreude.
Why do you think people like getting you upset?
I’m controversial and more famous than they are. There’s a lot of jealousy.
https://www.law.com/almID/1202715316005/Prof-Dershowitz-Tell-Me-How-You-Really-Feel/?slreturn=20190308174659 2/3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-11 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4
4/8/2019 Prof. Dershowitz, Tell Me How You Really Feel | Law.com
I gather you’re talking about legal academia.
Yes, it’s a cesspool of jealousy. People in it lack courage.
But you’re no stranger to harsh criticism. People weren’t exactly nominating you
for a justice award for getting O.J. Simpson and Claus von Bulow off the hook.
Some of the criticisms against me have been just. I’m a tough lawyer. But charging me
with one of the most heinous crimes is on a different level. I’ve never been attacked like
this. I don’t know any lawyer or professor who’s had these accusations waged against
them. It’s worse than what Clarence Darrow had to face.
You retired from Harvard Law School a year ago. Did you expect so much
excitement at this stage of your career?
This is an absolute shock. I’m living my little life here [in Florida, New York and Martha's
Vineyard]. I lead a boring life. I’ve been married to the same woman for 28 years. She
goes with me everywhere. People know that I won’t argue a case or give a speech
unless my wife travels with me. This is not the profile of someone who screws around.
You take all this very, very personally, don’t you?
Wouldn’t you? I’ve got two grandchildren in college and they are reading this about me.
This is the fight of my life.
Note: We have been in contact with Edwards and Cassell and hope to get their sides of
the story soon.
https://www.law.com/almID/1202715316005/Prof-Dershowitz-Tell-Me-How-You-Really-Feel/?slreturn=20190308174659 3/3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-12 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 12
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-12 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-12 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-12 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-13 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT 13
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-13 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-13 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-13 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-14 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT 14
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-14 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-14 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-15 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 15
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-15 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT 16
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 2 of 6
An Epstein sex case is settled;
Dershowitz denies latest
allegation
BY JULIE K. BROWN
DECEMBER 19, 2018 8:30 PM, UPDATED DECEMBER 27, 2018 7:55 AM
Accused sex traffickers Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell have settled a federal civil lawsuit
filed by a woman who says she was ordered under threat of violence to have sex with them and
other influential individuals when she was in her early 20s, sources confirmed Wednesday.
Sarah Ransome, who now lives in Barcelona, claimed that she was recruited and trafficked for
sex by the pair in 2006 and 2007 — at the same time that Epstein, a wealthy New York hedge
fund manager, was under federal investigation for molesting dozens of underage girls at his
Palm Beach mansion.
Women who say they were victims of sexual abuse at the hands of Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein
want a judge to throw out his lenient plea deal. AP
According to a recent court transcript, among those people Ransome claims she was directed to
have sex with was Epstein’s lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, who helped negotiate a controversial plea
https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 3 of 6
deal that gave the eccentric multimillionaire — and co-conspirators employed by Epstein —
federal immunity in 2008.
Dershowitz, 80, told the Miami Herald that he has never met Ransome nor has he ever had sex
with her. He accused Ransome’s attorney, powerhouse lawyer David Boies, of inventing the
story and using her and another woman, Virginia Roberts, to frame him. Roberts asserted in a
federal court affidavit in 2015 that Epstein forced her to have sex with Dershowitz when she was
16 years old.
“I am the victim. David Boies and these women are the perpetrators,’’ Dershowitz said. “They
have willfully and deliberately concocted stories in order to make money — millions and
millions of dollars. And I will not rest until the entire story comes out,’’ said Dershowitz, a
professor at Harvard Law School and frequent Fox news guest commentator.
Nowhere in the court case or the transcript does Ransome or anyone else allege that Ransome
had sex with Dershowitz — only that she was directed to.
The Ransome settlement, which is confidential, comes two weeks after Epstein settled another
lawsuit in Palm Beach, filed by an attorney who represented several women who said they were
coerced into sex acts with Epstein when they were underage. As part of the settlement, Epstein,
65, issued an apology to Fort Lauderdale attorney Bradley Edwards, admitting that he leveled
false claims in a lawsuit as part of an effort to intimidate Edwards into abandoning his
aggressive advocacy for the women, who are now in their late 20s and early 30s.
The developments follow a series of stories published by the Miami Herald in late November
that detailed how state and federal prosecutors worked with Epstein’s lawyers to conceal the
extent of Epstein’s crimes, and secretly negotiated an unusual plea agreement that allowed him
to escape federal sex trafficking charges that could have sent him to prison for life. The
agreement, by design, was kept from his victims so that they could not appear at his sentencing.
Last week, more than two dozen lawmakers in Washington demanded a federal investigation
into that plea deal, which was negotiated, signed and sealed by former Miami U.S. Attorney
Alexander Acosta, now President Donald Trump’s secretary of labor.
Acosta has not commented on the Herald story or on the calls
for a probe into how he handled the Epstein case.
This week, a decade after defending Epstein, Dershowitz once
again found himself in the spotlight amid the new allegations,
mentioned briefly in a court filing on Nov. 28, and first
reported on Tuesday by the New York Daily News.
During a Nov. 7 hearing, Maxwell’s lawyer, Laura Menninger,
mentioned Dershowitz’s name as among those “third parties’’
that Ransome claims she was instructed to have sex with,
according to a transcript of the hearing obtained by the Herald.
On Tuesday, after the Daily News published its story,
Dershowitz lashed out in dozens of posts on Twitter,
denouncing Ransome as “delusional’’ and claiming that her
lawyer, Boies, was retaliating against him because Dershowitz
had filed a bar complaint against him.
Alan Dershowitz says he has never met
the woman who alleges in a lawsuit she
was ordered to have sex with influential
men, including the famous lawyer. John
Lamparski GETTY IMAGES/TNS
“Attorney David Boies threatened that unless I withdrew a bar
complaint I had filed against him for falsely accusing me of
sexual misconduct, he would find another woman to accuse me of similar misconduct. He has
https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 4 of 6
now found an unbalanced woman who has delusions of having sex tapes of Donald Trump,
Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and other prominent figures,’’ Dershowitz said in a tweet.
Boies, best known for arguing on behalf of Vice President Al Gore in the 2000 Florida election
recount, responded in an interview with the Herald:
“[Dershowitz’s] charges are absurd. Either he has become totally unhinged or he thinks that if
he says things that are loud enough and crazy enough it will distract attention from what he has
done. There is no support — none — for what he says.’’
Ransome claimed that, in her early 20s, she was recruited to work as a masseuse for Epstein
who, in exchange, promised he would help her get into fashion design in New York, according to
her civil lawsuit, filed in January 2017. Epstein and Maxwell then kept her passport and
threatened to ruin her life and physically harm her if she didn’t have sex with them and others
in 2006 and 2007, Ransome said in the complaint.
The complaint alleges that this all occurred at the same time as Epstein’s lawyers were
negotiating with Acosta and other federal prosecutors for a deal to avoid federal sex trafficking
charges in connection with a scheme in which he lured underprivileged girls, mostly 13 to 16, to
his home in Palm Beach under the pretense that he would pay them $200 to $300 for massages.
Instead, police in Palm Beach found that he had been molesting and sexually abusing dozens of
girls between 2001 and 2007.
In this photograph, Virginia Roberts socializes with Prince Andrew as Jeffrey
Epstein associate Guislaine Maxwell stands in the background. Roberts claims she
was effectively used as a sex slave by Epstein. In that capacity she had sex with
the prince, Roberts says. The prince denied that. COURTESY OF VIRGINIA ROBERTS
Under the plea deal, known as a non-prosecution agreement, Epstein was allowed to plead
guilty in state court to two prostitution charges. He served 13 months in a private wing of the
Palm Beach County jail, where he was given liberal work release privileges. The deal also
quashed an FBI investigation into whether Epstein was operating an international sex
trafficking organization, the Herald found as part of its yearlong investigation.
“Even as [Epstein, Maxwell and other defendants] and their attorneys were busy arguing
Epstein’s innocence and publicly defaming his victims as liars...defendants merely changed
their location’’ from Palm Beach to “other places in the U.S. [including the Southern District of
New York] and abroad and brought them to Epstein’s mansion in New York City and his private
island in the Virgin Islands,’’ Ransome’s complaint alleged.
https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 5 of 6
Dershowitz, in interviews with the Herald, and in recent public statements, said he has never
met Ransome. He also said she initially tried to interest the New York Post in her story, but a
reporter whom he said he spoke with told him Ransome was not credible. He said he has a trove
of emails between Ransome and the reporter that prove she is a “lunatic.’’
“There are hundreds of emails in which she claimed to have sex with everybody in the world and
also claimed she has video of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and others having sex
with underage girls — but she never ever accused me in these emails,’’ Dershowitz said.
The emails are under seal, he said, and therefore cannot be made public. Dershowitz said he has
asked the court to unseal them but his efforts thus far have been unsuccessful.
In the recent court transcript, however, it is Maxwell’s attorney, Laura Menninger — not
Ransome or her attorneys — who named Dershowitz.
“[Ransome] has alleged not only that my client [Maxwell] ran a sex trafficking organization but
she claims also that she was directed by my client and the Epstein defendants to have sex with
third parties, including Alan Dershowitz, for example,’’ Menninger said. “And so to the extent
my client or Mr. Dershowitz or anyone else is going to be asked about their private sexual
activity, I believe that would implicate their privacy rights...’’
Roberts, who now lives in Australia, said that Epstein ordered her to have sex with Dershowitz
six times, according to a 2015 affidavit, which was filed in connection with an unrelated Epstein
federal lawsuit.
At that time, Dershowitz launched a media blitz on TV asserting that Roberts made up the story.
He also called for Roberts’ lawyers — Edwards and University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell
— to be disbarred. The lawyers sued Dershowitz for defamation, and the case was settled last
year.
Dershowitz publicly declared he was vindicated after a federal judge ordered Roberts’ affidavit
stricken from the court record. But the judge did not address the veracity of her sexual
misconduct claims; he instead ruled that the affidavit was misplaced in a case not involving
Dershowitz.
Boies, whose firm represented Roberts pro bono, addressed Dershowitz’s longstanding
contention that he had been exonerated.
“Anytime in a lawsuit where you were the defendant and you paid the plaintiff $900,000 to
settle it — that’s a strange kind of vindication,’’ Boies said, asserting that Dershowitz paid that
amount as part of the defamation settlement with Edwards and Cassell.
In 2016, Dershowitz released a statement following what he said was “an independent
investigation’’ that had been conducted by former FBI Director Louis Freeh, who is now a
private consultant.
“Our investigation found no evidence to support the accusations of sexual misconduct against
Professor Dershowitz. In fact, in several instances, the evidence directly contradicted the
accusations made against him,’’ Freeh wrote.
Most of the court records in the Roberts case are sealed. In February, the Miami Herald filed a
motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking access to documents. The motion, which
was not opposed by Roberts, could shed more light on the full scope of Epstein’s crimes and
who was involved.
https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-16 Filed 04/16/19 Page 6 of 6
The motion was denied. The Herald is appealing.
https://www.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article223315075.html
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022107.txt,"JaMES PATTERSON
FIL:

encounter with Epstein. The woman had not wanted to make a Then, Alicia told the cop
formal complaint at the time. But she had taken the cop's card, her will while acting as though
and now he was happy to hear that she'd changed her mind. had stopped Epstein, and left
In a shaky voice, Alicia described Epstein as a tallish man— ; incident.
five feet eleven or six feet in height was her guess—with gray At the top of his crime
hair and brown eyes. He was the owner of a large black four-door F Battery.” But Epstein was ne
Mercedes and was a regular at Shutters on the Beach, which was | Santa Monica Police Departme
the kind of place that cost one thousand dollars a night and was t : allegations of improper condu
frequented by actors, agents, and other Hollywood types. ‘ ; no action on this 1997 comp
Alicia told the cop that she was a model and actress herself. b attorney, Jack Goldberger, told
She'd known Epstein for about a month. They had a friend in “The cops said it'd be my
common, and she'd sent him her head shots. ei j paper. “And since he had a’
Then, through an assistant, Epstein had invited her to meet 4 3 thought much about it since, 1
in his room at the hotel. i ‘ now, I want everybody to i
Alicia said she was having reservations, the officer wroteinhis been.”

report, because generally interviews are not conducted in hotel

rooms.
According to her, things turned frightening quickly.

She was unsure she was safe because although she wanted to
land the job as a ‘Victoria's Secret’ catalog model she felt as
though Epstein was attempting to get her to act in an unpro-

fessional manner for a model.
Epstein wore navy blue sweatpants and a white T-shirt, she 4
recalled. The T-shirt had the letters USA printed on it in patriotic

red, white, and blue.

Epstein told her to undress and actually assisted her to do so

while saying ‘let me manhandle you for a second.

140

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022107
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019329.txt,"Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019329
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013364.txt,"8. In the Spring of 2009 (approximately April), I joined the law firm of Rothstein,
Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A. (“RRA”). I brought my existing clients with me when I
joined RRA, including L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. When I joined the firm, I was not
aware that Scott Rothstein was running a Ponzi scheme at RRA. Had I known such a
Ponzi scheme was in place, I would never have joined RRA.

9. I am now aware that it has been alleged that Scott Rothstein made fraudulent
presentations to investors about the lawsuiis that I had filed on behalf of my clients
against Epstein and that it has been alleged that these lawsuits were used to fraudulently
lure investors into Rothstein’s Ponzi scheme. I never met a single investor, had no part
in any such presentations and had no knowledge any such fraud was occurring. If these
allegations are true, I had no knowledge that any such fraudulent presentations were
occurring and no knowledge of any such improper use of the case files.

10. Epstein’s Complaint against me alleges that Rothstein made false statements about
cases filed against Epstein, i.c., that RRA had 50 anonymous females who had filed suit
against Epstein; that Rothstein sold an interest in personal injury lawsuits, reached
agreements to share attorneys fees with non-lawyers, paid clients “up front” money; and
that he used the judicial process to further his Ponzi scheme. If Rothstein did any of
these things, I had no knowledge of his actions. Because I maintained close contact
with my clients, EW, LM and Jane Doe, and Scott Rothstein never met any of them, I
know for certain that none of my clients were paid “up front’ money by anyone.

11. Epstein alleges that I attempted to take the depositions of his “high profile friends and
acquaintances” for no legitimate litigation purpose. This is untrue, as all of my actions
im representing L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe were aimed at providing them effective
representation in their civil suits, With regard to Epstein’s friends, through documents
and information obtained in discovery and other means of investigation, I learned that
Epstein was sexually molesting minor girls on a daily basis and had been for many
years. I also learned the unsurprising fact that he was molesting the girls in the privacy
of his mansion in West Palm Beach, meaning that locating witnesses to corroborate
their testimony would be difficult to find. I also learned, from the course of the
litigation, that Epstein and his lawyers were constantly attacking the credibility of the
girls, that Epstein’s employees were all represented by lawyers who apparently were
paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein, that co-conspirators whose representation
was also apparently paid for by Epstein were all taking the Fifth (like Epstein) rather
than provide information in discovery. For example, I was given reason to believe that
Sarah Kellen, Larry Visoski, Larry Harrison, David Rogers, Louella Rabuyo, Nadia
Marcinkova, Ghislaine Maxwell, Mark Epstein, and Janusz Banasiak all had lawyers
paid for by Epstein. Because Epstein and the co-conspirators in his child molestation
criminal enterprise blocked normal discovery avenues, I needed to search for other
ordinary approaches to strengthen the cases of my clients. Consistent with my training
and experience, these other ordinary approaches included finding other witnesses who
could corroborate allegations of sexual abuse of my clients or other girls. Some of these
witnesses were friends of Epstein. Given his social status, it also turned out that some
of his friends were high-profile individuals.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013364
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023650.txt,"create jobs and create development. However, what distinguish this matter is that the decision is 100%
totally owned by the government. The government today has made a decision requiring that any
industry should be linked to local content (i.e. | will not buy from you unless you tell me how much you
give me local content). There are types of industries, low-sensitive technology industries and in this case
other countries do not have the embarrassment of being transferred to you 100% inside Saudi Arabia,
such as light weapons or ammunitions or what can be included under it or spare parts or structures, etc.
And there are a medium-sensitive technology industries, some countries have a certain sensitivity, we
try to get out of the deal a certain percentage for the local content, and sometimes we manage to reach
70% of the local content, sometimes 50%, and sometimes 20%. There are also complex industries that
countries refuse to transfer technology to Saudi Arabia. Here, we stipulate that the main materials are
through Saudi Arabia, which has an indirect impact on the local content inside Saudi Arabia, but the
condition in the competent authorities in Saudi Arabia today is that no weapon deal without local
content targeting 100 % of industry transfer. If we do not succeed we must end up in 2030 with 50%
local content. This means that from 50% (S 70 billion) will be spent inside Saudi Arabia in 2030 and will
gradually increase. His Highness has pointed out that today there is a range of armament deals will be
announced in the coming period. In each deal, we will know how much the local content is, and how
many job opportunities will be provided by it. Arming is the largest item in the local content. The second
item is the automotive industry, where car purchases by the Saudis are almost S$ 30 billion a year,
sometimes higher than and sometimes less than. The positive element is that $ 13 billion of these
purchases are purchases for the Saudi government and we can start with the first stage is to provide the
needs of the Saudi government through Saudi manufacturing companies that the Saudi government is
contributing to. This will bring us 40% to 43% in 2030 in the automotive industry.

* Will there be a localization of the automotive industry?

- We will not try to offer goods to the citizen in the next ten years as cars, it will be very difficult to
compete in prices and also to convince him of the quality required, but we can ensure that these deals
for the government in exchange for creating this industry within Saudi Arabia, and the third most
important item of the local content is entertainment and tourism (22 billion dollars a year out of Saudi
Arabia on entertainment and tourism) This is the most difficult item because its decision in full to the
Saudi citizen and there is no part of the purchases with the Saudi government, it is very difficult that you
invest in an investment convince the Saudi citizen that instead of spending this money outside Saudi
Arabia to spend it inside Saudi Arabia. Also target 50% in 2030. Under the local content, there are too
many items, this (230 billion US dollars) of which we are targeting US $ 115 billion to be spent annually
in Saudi Arabia and increasing gradually after 2030. Hence, until reaching 2030, these are all challenges
and profitability in it are not as expected or as required and the risk is very high, no one will invest in it
except the Public Investment Fund so that this sector succeeds and then privatize and sell in the stock
market then Companies are listed in the stock market and the fund starts to recover its expenses and
enters into another chance. This is the second sector targeted by the Public Investment Fund after
mining. The third sector targeted by the Public Investment Fund is the logistics sector. We have three
very large logistics opportunities and we operate very strongly. The most important opportunity is the
Red Sea. 13% of the world trade passes through the Red Sea and Saudi Arabia provides nothing at this
field (zero services), and here are huge opportunities to work along the Red Sea for many exports and
imports of countries. We began today to work with many countries since the recent time headed by

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023650
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027984.txt,"groups of three men each would take care of the apartments. Four more would
remain outside to deal with the concierges or security guards or any other
interference, and to command and co-ordinate. We’d leave the same way we
came in, by sea.

Dado nodded. I found out later that he’d asked the same question of Manno,
who had proposed a classic regular-army raid. They would block the road with
ten armed paratroopers on each end with the aim of holding off resistance, while
another two dozen went in to the apartments and attacked. I could only assume
Dado concluded that this almost certainly wouldn’t work, at least not without
major trouble. It would certainly forfeit any chance of surprise.

“The mission is yours,” he said. “Manno will be in overall command,
offshore. Because we’re also planning to hit several other targets.”

The reason for the urgent summons was that the Mossad had confirmed all
three Palestinians would be in their apartments in 10 days’ time. Everyone
involved realized that — given its complexity, the obvious risks, and the
inevitable unknowns — the operation could well go wrong. In fact, one reason
for Dado’s “other targets” was to ensure that if it did, there would be successes
elsewhere to provide a credible justification for having sent Israeli forces into
Beirut. As we received further intelligence, new obstacles had to be factored in.
The main one was the presence of a gendarmerie, a Lebanese police post, at the
bottom end of the street, only 500 feet or so from the apartments. And we would
be operating in a crowded, up-market residential area. We could only hope that
at the hour we struck, most people would be in bed. Or out partying. This was,
after all, pre-civil war Beirut, the “Paris of the Middle East’.

In the years since, an extraordinary array of stories has grown up around the
sayeret’s final and best-known mission during my term as commander,
culminating in the dramatic version in Stephen Spielberg’s movie Munich. |
remember reading in one earlier book, otherwise surprisingly accurate, about
our five weeks of intensive training. Even the full 10 days which I thought we’d
been given would have been a bonus. In fact, we had half that as a full team,
since our Mossad drivers, European-born Israelis, had to make their way
through Paris to Beirut as tourists, rent the cars and scout out our route from the
seashore to Rue Verdun.

There were four other operations planned alongside ours: three by paratroop
units and one by the Shayetet 13 SEALs, against a series of Fatah and
Democratic Front installations. Though all of them, like ours, would need help

136
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027984
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025502.txt,"Flags: 1150981
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No

GUID: 93F5AF50-07A8-4439-A6C3-F92AD024B663

Message: 2 pm should work

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/09/19 05:27:06 AM (581776026)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

T,

GUID: ED59175F-8A24-4B21-BFB1-AE33

ES 7OF6OE

Message: Like last time. , try to get some sleep so you are a world class opponent not
an open mike type

Time: 06/09/19 05:54:45 AM (581777685)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F866479D-746F-42B0-BA32-11EFFF5537F!

Ez

Message: roger

Time: 06/09/19 02:42:38 PM (581809358)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID? 22993CC3-3D75—-45 4E-8C2D- SC354B 63 0AF6

Message: https://nypost.com/2019/06/09/bannon-biden-must-release-tax-returns-to
address-china-connections/

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/09/19 06:36:16 PM (581823376)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 41CC86FC-7912-4B51-82FB-98529FFFEEF5

Message: Last two interivews?

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
Time: 06/10/19 03:07:32 AM (581854052)

Flags: 1085445

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025502
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023448.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 9/24/2014 12:07:26 AM 
To: Michael Wolff 
Subject: Re: Highlight 
Importance: High 
not sure yet talk in mornig 
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Michael Wolff <1__________________________________> wrote: 
Fab! And tomorrow? 
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
clinton woody kagan, do not add one penny to budget 
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Lisa New > wrote: 
That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments 
Don't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my 
boyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or, getting creamed on 
my producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be 
someone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there. 
When do we do Whitman's ""Song of Myself"" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready. 
A few other follow ups: 
David and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget. 
No writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no 
actors, no travel beyond the one location, certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or 
david brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said, I think If were hiring the crew id do it for 
less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does 
Wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for 
templeton, so thank you. 
I really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff, but in googling him I noticed that we have the 
same birthday! May I have his email? 
You are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep 
reading ? 
Sent from my iPhone 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 023448 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 023449 
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020710.txt,"Image source: yuyamika7

#13 Marilyn Monroe

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020710
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023888.txt,"142 Teaching Minds

Young woman: Good judgment.

Interviewer: Any specifics?

Young woman: I think she would control the out-of-control
spending.

Young woman: I think she would acknowledge the system of
government in the United States rather than focus on the
administration of czars.

Interviewer: Yeah, and what is your problem with czars?

Young woman: I’m an American and we don’t have czars in
America.

Here again, we have a juxtaposition of beliefs based on no actual evi-
dence or reality. I don’t know what this woman has heard about czars,
but whatever it is, it misses the point. Could we teach this woman to
be on point—to say meaningful things based on actual evidence? Not
now, I fear, but it is my contention that we could have done so at some
point in her life. School has failed her and she seems, to anyone listen-
ing, to be stupid. But she is not really stupid; she is just talking stu-
pidly because she hasn’t been challenged to behave in any other way.
Here is another:

Middle-aged woman: Governor of Alaska is the only one that has
top security.

Interviewer: What does that mean?

Middle-aged woman: It means that if anything happens to our
borders on that side, she’s the first one in line for attack for
there.

This person not only makes no sense, but she can’t speak in an under-
standable way. Is that genetic? I doubt it. Intelligence, as it is popularly
defined, includes the ability to produce coherent speech, which cer-
tainly can be enhanced through teaching, but apparently not by our
schools as they currently exist.

Here is one last interview from that event:

Interviewer: What do you think of foreign policy—what would
you like to see her do with foreign policy?

Man with cap: I don’t know, I really don’t have an answer—I
don’t know her well enough. I don’t know what she knows or
doesn’t know. I don’t know some stuff of what people ask me.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023888
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031484.txt,"From: Will Bohlen

Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 1:19 PM

To: ‘Keough, Michael’ i. King, Kathryn {qq >; Miller, Michael
ES \2tcly0 Wohl NE |. Alp Asiandogan
<>; \Veingarten, Reid i >; Remzi Kuler <i
Weinstein, Jason (qa: Osman Oz. <a: David Marin
<>; Erin Billings <r; Drake, William <>
Cc: Eliopoulos, Steven <9 >

Subject: RE: Audio recording

Thank you, Michael.

Reuters story just posted:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-security-gulen-idUSKCN10G1P8 ?il=0

World | Fri Aug 5, 2016 1:07pm EDT
Related: WORLD

Lawyers for U.S.-based
Turkish cleric fear attacks
on his life

WASHINGTON | BY JULIA HARTE

Lawyers for U.S.-based Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen said on Friday
they feared attacks on his life following Turkey's demands that he be
extradited to face allegations that he ordered a failed coup against the
government last month.

The lawyers said they expected Gulen, who has denied any
involvement in the July 15 coup attempt, will remain in his remote
mountain compound in Pennsylvania.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031484
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017995.txt,"EXHIBIT 6

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017995
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030942.txt,"Grant_Smith080168*eMailContent. htm

Fed up with the prosecutor and in the presence of the jury, the witness preceded to recount my debate
over recording from the first interview. Pointing to me in the back of the courtroom, the witness |
announced that I had warned him that they would pull this crap with the """"302"""" report.

It didn't take the jury very long to acquit.

With the advent of DNA and groups like the Innocence Project, we have now seen that so-called
untecordéd confessions have put many innocent people in jail and even on Death Row. As a result,
agencies such as the BSO, now require all interviews to be taped.

Like anyone, including lawyers, the FBI wants to control the record of the interview. Taping hurts that
effort. .

I'm not saying that it is FBI policy to step over the line. But they have chalk on their shoes more often
_ than you can imagine.

So, what's should you do if the FBI comes calling?

First of all, the advice I am about to give is not for the a guy who was an inadvertent witness to a bank
robbery.

Tam talking about people who are being interviewed as part of the types of crimes that are best
described as corruption, RICO, white collar, etc.

Those are the kinds of cases that involve tons of evidence. Giving an innocent, but incorrect answer to a
vague question could leave any of us in deep CaCa.

‘A case in point is the lead story in the September 26, 2009 Herald. Chris Walton, director of the
Broward County Transportation Department, was interviewed by two FBI agents.

' He stated that they wanted to know if """"commissioners attempted-to influence contracts.""""
""""T told them no.""""

It may sound like a simple straight forward Q-and-A but it ain't necessarily so, He may think his
interview and public statement ends the matter:

In actuality, he has thrown down the gauntlet in front of the FBI.

Start out with the understanding that the FBI is not investigating to see if there is crime and ‘corruption in
Broward County government. They already believe there is. They are only trying to uncover evidence to
confirm their beliefs. -

file:///C\/Documents%20and%20Settings/Trial/Desktop/E...uction/eDocs/eMail/Grant_! Smith080168*eMailContent.htm (3 of $} [11/6/2010 10:16:53 PM]
14542

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030942
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014724.txt,"are reasons to think that the worst may be already behind us and that the higher
rates/higher USD trades will soon resume. We make our case in the following sections.

Trade wars: near-term risk drops

Developments over the past three weeks have led us to conclude that the risk of trade
wars with Mexico and China has abated significantly, at least for the short-term:

¢ China: We take some comfort in the fact that the only item in his 100 day plan that
President Trump has reneged on is his promise to label China as a currency
manipulator on his first day as president (Table 1). In his interview with the WS) on
January 13, Trump said that he “would talk to them first”. He added: “Certainly they
are manipulators. But I’m not looking to do that.” This and the fact that Trump
changed tack on Taiwan last week by telling the Chinese president he would honor
the “One China” policy suggest to us a pragmatic approach to dealing with China.

¢ Mexico: We are relieved by the climbing-down by the administration after the
Mexican president cancelled his trip to Washington over Trump’s insistence that
Mexico pay for the wall. Reince Priebus, the influential White House Chief of Staff,
suggested that there is a “buffet of options” to pay for the wall, including by going
after the drug cartels. The Mexican foreign minister welcomed the overture by
saying that “It's a signal that ... must be welcomed because we are already seeing
how the discussion is changing”.

Table 1: Trump’s 100 day plan (On the first day of my term of office, my administration will immediately pursue the following):

A hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce the federal workforce through attrition Done
A requirement that for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations must be eliminated. Done
A five-year ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service. Done
A lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government. Done
I will announce my intention to renegotiate NAFTA or withdraw from the deal under Article 2205 Done
| will announce our withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Done
Lift the Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital energy infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline, to move forward. Done
Begin the process of selecting a replacement for Justice Scalia from one of the 20 judges on my list Done
Cancel all federal funding to sanctuary cities. Done
Suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where vetting cannot safely occur. All vetting of people coming into our country will be considered “extreme vetting.” Done
Begin removing the more than two million criminal illegal immigrants from the country and cancel visas to foreign countries that won't take them back Done
| will direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator. Not Done

| will direct the Secretary of Commerce and U.S. Trade Representative to identify all foreign trading abuses that unfairly impact American workers and direct them to use every tool under

American and international law to end those abuses immediately. Not Done
Propose a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress. Not Done
Acomplete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections. Not Done
Cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure. Not Done
| will lift the restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars’ worth of job-producing American energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal. Not Done

Source: Donaldtrump.com/centract; BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research

ACA reforms: not before fiscal reforms

In an interview on February 5, Trump walked back his promise to replace Obamacare in
short order, saying that the process is “complicated” and “maybe it’ll take till sometime
into next year.” In contrast, asked if Americans should expect a tax cut this year, he said:
“| think before the end of the year | would like to say yes.”

In our view, the prevailing pessimism that Obamacare will take precedence over tax cuts
is not consistent with three key facts on the table:

* The Republicans, with only 52 seats in the Senate, do not have the votes to replace
Obamacare.

¢ It is by now a broadly shared view among Republican leadership that to repeal
Obamacare without replacing it would be very risky politically.

e There is no consensus among Republicans about how to replace Obamacare. For
example, 31 states took up federal funding to expand Medicaid under Obamacare

Bankof America
4 Cause and Effect | 13 February 2017 Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014724
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028309.txt,"THE HOUSE OF THE NOBLEMAN
CURATED BY WOLFE VON LENKIEWICZ & VICTORIA GOLEMBIOVSKAYA

PRESS CLIPPING (INTERNET)

http://markets.financialcontent.com/stocks/news/read?GUID=15146274

Cadogan Tate Sponsors 'New Sensations’ Art Exhibition

Sunday October 17, 2010 - 06:04 AM EDT

Cadogan Tate, the world class art moving, storage and shipping specialist in contemporary art
(http://www.cadogantate.com/fineart/contemporary-art-services.html), has sponsored the 'New Sensations
2010' exhibition for UK art students. Organised by Channel 4 and The Saatchi Gallery, this prestigious event aims
to discover the most imaginative and talented artists graduating from BA and MA courses in the UK and to
support students leaving art college.

A total of 20 students were shortlisted to present their work in the exhibition. This is being held at Boswall House,
2 Cornwall Terrace - a magnificent 18th century building off Regent's Park - from 14th to 20th October. The event
forms part of 'The House of the Nobleman'’, under the curatorship of Wolfe von Lenkiewicz and Victoria
Golembiovskaya.

Four of the finalists in New Sensations 2010 - Pablo Wendel, Katie Surridge, Nika Neelova and Ula Wiznerowicz -
have each been given a bursary to develop a new work for the exhibition. A short film about each of them was
aired on Channel 4 in early October.

Stephen Glynn, Cadogan Tate's Fine Art (http://www.cadogantate.com/fineart/) Director, comments: ""We are
delighted to be the sponsors of this important exhibition, which showcases the talent of some remarkable young
artists. We have spent many years transporting and storing the world's most precious contemporary art for
leading museums, galleries and collectors. It therefore seemed very appropriate that we should support and
encourage the UK's leading art students through this exciting event.""

Read the full story at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/10/prweb4659384.htm.

29

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028309
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021368.txt,"of dependence upon God for what one is,
However, long one exists.” A human
being therefore depends upon God for
more than the fact of his or her birth: he
or she remains dependent upon God in
the same way ever after. God’s creation
of the world in general is simply not
temporally indexed; it is no more closely
associated with the beginning of things
than with what comes later. A
preoccupation with temporal origins
therefore commonly drops out of
Christian accounts of creation: the world
is just as dependent upon God for its
existence whether it has a beginning or
always exists.” Belief in God’s creation
of the world for these reasons blurs into
belief in God’s supportive maintenance
of it at every point in time.

Also enabling belief in God as
creator to form a general backdrop to all
one’s experience—to be relevant on
every occasion as a universally
applicable worldview--is the fact that
God is thought to be responsible as
creator for the whole of what happens in
the world at any one time. To believe
that God is the creator of the world is at
the very least to believe that God holds
into existence the entirety of the world in
any and all respects in which it is good.
In the case of one’s own life, therefore,
every aspect of value at every moment—
one’s existence, fine qualities and
capacities, enjoyments and
achievements, beneficial connections
with natural and social environments,
and so on—is to be attributed to God’s
agency as creator. While there is a good
deal of disagreement within Christianity
on this matter, Christians, moreover, not
uncommonly affirm that God is equally
behind the bad things that happen, at
least insofar as those bad things can be
turned to good account--for example,
harm suffered turned into a salutary

122

Page

pedagogical correction, just punishment
for sin, the necessary testing of one’s
faith, or simply a beneficial form of
sympathy with God’s own suffering on
the cross. For both the general reasons
just mentioned—because of its holism
and temporal inclusiveness--belief in
God as the creator of the world
encourages love, gratitude, and trust
toward God, and toward the world that
God brings about, as constant Christian
dispositions, basic Christian attitudes of
wide-ranging applicability, whatever
might be going on in one’s life.

Social Connectedness and Invisibility

The same all-inclusive causal
dependence upon God at all times is
what ensures individuals are never left
on their own, never abandoned to their
own devices. Christian theologians
(especially in the Protestant tradition)
usually develop the psychological
implications of this in terms of avoiding
either anxious or arrogant self-
concern.” According to this theology,
one does not believe he or she ever
operates independently of God.
Therefore, one should never attribute
successes and achievements in a prideful
way to oneself, but rather one should
always give the glory to God as their
ultimate source. For the same reason,
one should never despair of failings, as if
one’s own inadequacies were the last
word; one believes a supremely
powerful and loving influence, God,
remains an operative force in one’s life,
However, desperate the situation
otherwise appears to be from the
standpoint of one’s own powers and
capacities to improve one’s lot in life.

By discouraging isolated self-
regard or self-understanding generally,
the same nexus of Christian ideas about
God as creator has clear consequences

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021368
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023136.txt,"OUP CORRECTED PROOF - FINAL, 12/9/2014, SPi

OXFORD

UNIVERSITY PRESS

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries

© Commentary: Terje Red-Larsen, Nur Laig, and Fabrice Aidan 2014
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2014
Impression: 1

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above

You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available

Library of Congress Control Number: 2014939580
ISBN 978-0-19-921610-9

Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CRO 4YY

INTERNATIONAL
PEACE
INSTITUTE

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023136
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018318.txt,"Most of our networked world is a pool of buzzing, fresh interaction - not only hard
to predict, but constantly on the sharp edge of making something new. Scientists
like Holland call this “emergence”, the way that bottom-up interactions —- between
cells or chips or traders or cars - create a larger order, often something that was not
there before. The fundamental uncertainty of this process means it’s often excluded
from the way we look at the world. It’s easier to assume a predictable, linear,
complicated logic is at work. An “a leads to b and c” sort of logic: revolution leads to
freedom which leads to democracy, for instance. That such predictions are often
wrong - and that we’re so often surprised by events in economics or politics - is a
reminder that compicated systems are often complex, lit with mechanisms that
almost gleefully snap off the fingers of meddling, confident planners. Too often we
look at some puzzle - Iraq, income inequality - and think itis merely “complicated.”
We should know better. “Macro models failed to predict the crisis and seemed
incapable of explaining what was happening to the economy in a convincing
manner,” the European Central Banker Jean-Claude Trichet lamented in the
aftermath of 2008s cascading, complex financial crises, when markets and officials
discovered that the problem with their system was not merely that it was “too big to
fail” but also “too connected to manage” - and possibly “too complex to
comprehend.” Trichet sounded a little shell-shocked. “As a policy maker during the
crisis I found the available models of little help. In fact, I would go further: In the
face of the crisis, we felt abandoned by the conventional tools.”1""4

This sense of abandonment comes from an attempt to use a mechanical way of
thinking in age of complexity. 145 When you think an air force can simply pound an
insurgency to sand or that some old reliable business should survive because it rests
upon billions of dollars of infrastructure, you miss the energetic creative and
destructive power of complex connection. It’s not fully right to say: Networks
always beat hierarchies, because of course networks have layers and structures of
their own. But it’s not wrong to consider that complex systems tear easily at stiff,
competitive and overly-ordered ones, even the most carefully engineered
complicated ones. Think of the mafnicently ornamented dictatorships pushed to
collapse in recent years. Or, can you really look at the firm where you work and feel
a sense of living, flexible adaption in the face of connection?

In our age, the pressure of emerging change is particularly heightened by the very
nature of the digital devices themselves. The connected and algorithmic tools all
around us now lend themselves to the easy and cooperative interaction. In fact, that

114 Macro models: Jean-Claude Trichet “Reflections on the nature of monetary
policy non-standard measures and finance theory”, Speech at ECB Central Banking
Conference, Frankfurt, 18 November 2010

115 This sense of abandonment: Michele Catanzaro and Mark Buchanan, “Network
Opportunity.” Nature Physics Vol 9, March 2013 p. 121-122 or Cesar A. Hidalgo,
“Disconnected! The parallel streams of network literature in the natural and social
sciences”, (2015) arXiv:1511.03981

86

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018318
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025264.txt,"Swiss equities

Preference: neutral

SMI (24 Oct): 6,627 (last publication: 6,540)
UBS View SMI (6-month target): 6,700

e We stay neutral on Swiss equities relative to global ones. Swiss companies are internationally well
diversified, with about 2/3 of revenues generated in the US and in emerging markets. This provides the
basis for solid revenue and earnings, despite economic weakness in Europe.

¢ Swiss companies are trying to mitigate concerns about global economic prospects and a strong Swiss
franc using tight cost controls. This should protect operating margins.

¢ While the Swiss franc remains overvalued, the currency is not longer a drag. In fact, after depreciating
since summer versus the USD and related currencies, Swiss companies’ earnings will show positive currency
translation and margin effects.

e Especially in an environment of low economic growth we like the properties of decent earnings growth,
solid balance sheets and a reasonable valuation.

4 Positive scenario SMI (6-month target): 7,500

e Eurozone economic growth is reaccelerating considerably, providing further relief to Swiss financials as
well as Swiss exporters. Defensive sectors would likely be left behind in a strong global relief rally. In this
scenario, we would expect the equity market P/E to be re-rated to 15x and earnings to grow by 5% over
the next six months.

& Negative scenario SMI (6-month target): 5,600

¢ The global economy slides into a recession. Despite being less dependent on the global business cycle,
Swiss companies will also feel the drop in global demand. In this scenario, corporate earnings are likely to
drop slightly over the next six months and we would expect the P/E to contract toward 12.0x.

Note: Scenarios refer to global economic scenarios (see slide 7)

What we're watching Why it matters

Economic indicators Key announcements of domestic economic indicators: Nov 1, Manufacturing

PMI index; Nov 30, KOF Swiss leading indicator;

Key Swiss monetary policy dates that could impact Swiss equities: Nov 1, SNB
meeting

Monetary and economic
policy

Corporate news Key corporate announcement dates: Oct 30, Geberit, Oerlikon, Straumann &

UBS; Oct 31, Lonza & Sika

2 UBS

Recommendations

Tactical (6 months)

e We favor large caps over small caps.

e We like stocks paying high and
sustainable dividends.

e Within defensives, we favor the
Healthcare and Consumer Staples
sectors.

e Among the cyclical companies, we
prefer those with a broad emerging-
markets exposure and/or cheap
valuation, including insurers.

Strategic (1 to 2 years)

e We favor leaders in regards to the two
key Swiss success factors: innovation and
globalization.

Swiss market relative to world
equities

30

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011

— SMI realized PIE MSCI World: realized PIE

Source: Thomsen Reuters, UBS, as of October 24, 2012

Note: Past performance is not an indication of future returns.

For further information please contact ClO's asset class specialist Stefan Meyer, stefan-r.meyer@ubs.com u

Please see important disclaimer and disclosures at the end of the document.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025264
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027148.txt,"Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2017-02-18\III 
on 2017-02-17 at 13.43.34.ichat 
Service: iMessage 
Start Time: 02/17/17 10:43:34 AM (509049814) 
End Time: 02/18/17 02:54:40 PM (509151280) 
Last Message ID: 1401 
Chat Room: 
Participants: jee, 
Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com, 
Messages - 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 10:43:34 AM (509049814) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: A0865FA4-D96C-4769-A739-0CE6CA262BAA 
Message: Today? 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 10:44:06 AM (509049846) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 4340821F-EC4D-4B83-821F-186F4E03ACCC 
Message: Free 1230pst which is 330 EST 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/17/17 10:44:38 AM (509049878) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EE1DE19D-03D8-4F6A-8D49-DD91713DE11D 
Message: I'm on n Paris 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 10:57:48 AM (509050668) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 32A82305-5B44-491A-A751-68A339839DE6 
Message: I could call you in 35 minutes? 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027148 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/17/17 10:57:59 AM (509050679) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 909A907C-91DF-4D4A-87A1-526CC77DA5A7 
Message: Yes 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 10:58:21 AM (509050701) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 10C836CB-0099-41A9-89DE-6652C184B154 
Message: Will do 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 11:33:43 AM (509052823) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: D40D24CF-CO4D-4426-97A5-10C1E8602C8A 
Message: Free? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/17/17 11:34:33 AM (509052873) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2892F51D-4FBD-47CC-8644-26284FDAD263 
Message: 10 minutes 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 11:45:27 AM (509053527) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: C36F011C-1EAA-49C1-95FA-B413F50789F8 
Message: Have another call in 15 minutes 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 11:45:40 AM (509053540) 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027149 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2C06C676-75C7-4093-B360-FFFC329020B2 
Message: Free after / in about an hour 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:26:34 PM (509063194) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8C750762-B3DA-4141-AD4E-0961F8429CCF 
Message: https://share.kaiserpermanente.org/bio/bernard-j-tyson/ 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:26:34 PM (509063194) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7600A750-48B6-4BB1-BF63-036FF1FAF660 
Message: Is this person? 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/17/17 02:26:51 PM (509063211) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EB13A48D-DBFF-4200-8394-2004CC4DCEA8 
Message: Yes 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:27:56 PM (509063276) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 658E93A5-D679-4D0B-9888-086C41BB6141 
Message: MBA / seems more practical than a repurposed MD 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:28:15 PM (509063295) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027150 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: FB589FDD-F03A-434A-8113-073DBFFE47BB 
Message: You are up late! 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:29:33 PM (509063373) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 728B2571-A9C5-456D-BADA-0EA2DEF2397C 
Message: On jawbone - Steve says consider and possible good things w strong voices 
around hosain. Steve sometimes had very good insight. Sounds like your experience lousy 
and Company in big trouble 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:29:35 PM (509063375) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: ElA07C40-52F7-4FB9-8DEE-14FB621BD251 
Message: But 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:30:58 PM (509063458) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: OD8E6236-6EB2-4450-BEC6-BDEA5E2E121B 
Message: Middle East is perfect perfect to test clinical wearables (due to no legal or 
policy restrictions) and also to experiment w remote telemetry (don't have to leave 
home / great for gender issues there) 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:31:49 PM (509063509) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: ElFE8EC1-F410-496B-9E1E-64D4OCAE6FA2 
Message: Clinical wearables market is 50x bigger financially than consumer wearables / 
way better margins and also ready for major distribution 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:31:56 PM (509063516) 
Flags: 1060865 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027151 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: AB986341-8F2E-453E-B23A-FA1F279DDE7E 
Message: Disruption not distribution 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/17/17 02:32:05 PM (509063525) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 969C34BA-04C6-4CDA-AC61-1BB206E05FA4 
Message: Ok 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:32:55 PM (509063575) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: FD950B80-44D8-4FE6-8917-FDE488C2A941 
Message: Food for thought I guess we have to see what hosain does in coming weeks and 
months He's well positioned - hope he doesn't drop the ball. Sad to hear he's not 
honest. Steve says he's a hustler. 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:33:47 PM (509063627) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: All2AA96-6CCD-4464-8091-8F0B914F3lEE 
Message: He said he could even hustle and hustler ... but that it was Worth a second 
thought and he NEVER says that. You know STEVIE. He says no to everything. 
Sender: 
Time: 02/17/17 02:37:18 PM (509063838) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: B96521E2-51A0-4E07-9F96-84BD26EB4A56 
Message: And big big quiet Conversations Ongoing for a cool job for Stevie 
Sender: 111111111111 
Time: 02/17/17 02:37:37 PM (509063857) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027152 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: AE46A3C0-2EDF-4ED1-B6BC-5F45041493CA 
Message: Boy Scout leaving camp 0 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 06:45:07 AM (509121907) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 16B0C7BB-AF05-44E3-A6D5-905C1DAC9FC1 
Message: Just got the answer great Idea 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 07:00:32 AM (509122832) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 56653346-351A-4175-9B95-66DF41322442 
Message: GREAT 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 08:15:13 AM (509127313) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 1653DBB3-ACAB-423B-8013-264A7F94BF84 
Message: SO EXCITED ... just waking up 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 08:50:21 AM (509129421) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2E2186E9-5E5A-4FC7-9C89-6A8451BA5078 
Message: Call 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 08:59:34 AM (509129974) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 0252BFOC-D6C1-4934-8DA7-3CBF3683ECFC 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027153 
Message: Just got to harborview (hospital) need 20 mins am w residents 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 10:00:59 AM (509133659) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 331DEC14-BDD2-41ED-BE47-16538431C950 
Message: Sorry took a bit are you free in 5 mins need a bathroom break! 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 10:02:05 AM (509133725) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 5C951955-2522-4E24-A810-9B84C445DD9E 
Message: Yes 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 10:03:37 AM (509133817) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 29A79D86-C4F2-4314-BODF-6E1F3013D81D 
Message: K more in a sec 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 10:06:24 AM (509133984) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 110B793D-A5AC-4250-939D-1FCD1BBOE9F6 
Message: Ok ready! Call whenever 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 10:28:29 AM (509135309) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: A098FE4C-4CC2-4A47-B2AB-FFE3EC1507C9 
Message: http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/-mkowalcz/628.pdf 
Sender: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027154 
Time: 02/18/17 10:28:30 AM (509135310) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 0EA92954-CCC1-406A-BD8C-ODD58E550AC8 
Message: ""How to explain zero knowledge protocols to your children"" 1988 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 10:30:30 AM (509135430) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2C7B99B6-86AA-4D69-A4A4-6F676442BEF2 
Message: http://people.irisa.fr/Stephanie.Delaune/transparents/Annee2013/po.pdf 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 10:30:31 AM (509135431) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 5504A63C-7984-4A60-BD00-60B787EC96FC 
Message: Also good 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:35:05 PM (509150105) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: B8817D01-1F4E-48E0-9F60-4377CF6D80D4 
Message: GENIUS IDEA Now to convince bill 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:36:02 PM (509150162) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2E5909B2-7195-46CC-A7B0-B56B855E7068 
Message: Do you think there is a way to do this really well and also get something for 
BG? Like if we say do this and the admin will keep PEPFAR or something like that 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:36:25 PM (509150185) 
Flags: 1085445 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027155 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 857DBB02-7E57-48FA-8935-2043FC843624 
Message: yes and more 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:36:34 PM (509150194) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: FF823DF8-B725-45C4-983C-B5A289E0B43F 
Message: its a deal 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:36:39 PM (509150199) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 9763840B-5C95-4F9E-A28E-9C451573A6AA 
Message: thats what he likes 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:37:46 PM (509150266) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: OB581A4D-9A01-4F70-BFOB-06765B8CA313 
Message: he said malaria and polio not an american problem. climate change and eboloa 
not a american problem nor is clean water or genital mutilation. he thinks bill 
should stop trying to scare people .ike chicken little. 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:40:26 PM (509150426) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: BC70A811-E31B-47CE-9402-62D9012B0F78 
Message: PEPFAR is HIV AIDS 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:40:36 PM (509150436) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027156 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 731E0D61-854E-4897-8D92-DFBCA0989684 
Message: aids is partially an american problem. as is drug abuse. 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:40:51 PM (509150451) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 1013E5EA-BA23-493C-8A05-FE2A0042AEOD 
Message: OK let's keep thinking BG likes deals too 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:41:13 PM (509150473) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EF35822F-4E2E-48D4-8F23-53B479C5AECA 
Message: PEPFAR was a george bush/republican thing 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:41:35 PM (509150495) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 88BF3149-6E23-4CAO-A37A-00AFC1399A05 
Message: It's the only one of the international health things the republicans all seem 
to support 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:41:43 PM (509150503) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 8ACD5OFO-0598-461C-A843-4BA5E9AC375E 
Message: Trump even kept the obama person running it 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:42:16 PM (509150536) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: F9E3975C-3237-4295-B8F6-80716CDA3C49 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027157 
Message: If he could be convinced to keep PEPFAR as is in exchange for cyber i think we 
would all win 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:44:41 PM (509150681) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 50C2F487-D322-4BAF-8034-7238AB9B5537 
Message: bill needs to focus on american problems first and foremost , if he wants 
deals. he can also portray certain worldwide iniativies as buying american drugs 
etc. IT MUST have an american component. donald says it is childish to count the 
lives at risk in africa and make believe you are doing something for america. or 
pakistan afhhntan, etc. he points to 8500 killed in chicago vs 2500 killed in 
afganistan over the past 10 years. 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:45:00 PM (509150700) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 64B25B51-38AE-4475-96A4-0039CFDE6197 
Message: I understand 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:45:23 PM (509150723) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 33E9127E-E497-4994-80B3-5F4DDO3DD579 
Message: Bills advisory team at fndn all pushing in other direction 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:45:37 PM (509150737) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 6D6F3ADB-DAEC-4EB4-8706-586C7077B032 
Message: At c3 I can try to reposition Just until I get thrown out 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:46:01 PM (509150761) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027158 
GUID: 94082D04-D4FE-4FB4-97B8-8E485CBF3566 
Message: Wish there was a way for him to have a real Conversation 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:46:10 PM (509150770) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 051CCC82-D473-4ABE-BD71-A537E901839D 
Message: I sent bill a note to suggest he talk to lauder. donald also thinks bill 
wants not to help america first , he should use his own money, and even that is wrong 
as it was made here. just transmitting 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:47:19 PM (509150839) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: AlCC939F-2050-421C-A86E-8D085FAD56A0 
Message: I think trump should enforce tax laws and now allow gates fndn (American) to 
spend money overseas tax free 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:48:10 PM (509150890) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: D821869F-12DA-461D-A6CE-D5D966A8EAC9 
Message: number of lives saved per dollar amount is not in donalds mind, it must be 
american lives saved, and yes, good idea on tax 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:48:31 PM (509150911) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: AF83A72C-C655-40E8-88B5-0EC75C275027 
Message: Right now there are funny loopholes we figured out how to exploit 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:48:50 PM (509150930) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027159 
GUID: 49C5BC24-0097-429D-A169-F7CD6F139A6F 
Message: Like exercising expenditure responsibility on foreign grants so we could still 
count as charitable 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:49:15 PM (509150955) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 48C55FF5-52EC-4D9B-912A-EBB768462803 
Message: Or giving to UN or international orgs but earmarking for polio etc when not a 
single dollar ever benefitted USA 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:49:28 PM (509150968) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: F87908DE-CA87-4578-898B-88076A4DC6D2 
Message: I know where all those loopholes are bc I helped find them 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:49:29 PM (509150969) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: A92080DA-62B3-4AA4-8192-35A483E81EOD 
Message: understood I am good at that , however bill should be careful very careful 
as donald could make an example of him using american dollars to help other than 
america which really needs it. careful 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:50:22 PM (509151022) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: EF5E7799-544C-4EE2-A393-4594534C07E5 
Message: Understood 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:50:57 PM (509151057) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027160 
GUID: 29E3C4F8-C14F-4492-9562-23F7554CD28B 
Message: Let's make a deal for a few months To push cyber and then get out and help 
trump make examples and do better stuff 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:51:45 PM (509151105) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 9635D856-266E-40D2-8C61-0FE239C3C6DB 
Message: BG has already made too many commitments and he did it based on his foundation 
but counting on leveraging and influencing us Gov't 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:52:09 PM (509151129) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: B5B7CAC2-933D-46E8-B910-032839F5FA99 
Message: If the tax laws are enforced and he is forced to pay on his own and has less, 
lord knows how he will react 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:52:32 PM (509151152) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 6C5131A5-A953-4B8C-BEA3-571A16E81D0A 
Message: But - cyber is a ""let's do now"" thing March 15 I see BG next Friday 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:52:54 PM (509151174) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2D236981-7FC5-400C-BF3D-F117A9086804 
Message: cyber is great 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:53:50 PM (509151230) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 9FB93D12-71F9-460E-95EE-19F84876BBA7 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027161 
Message: Have to act quickly 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:54:03 PM (509151243) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 4FBB0209-3C21-4A28-A293-747C0A902087 
Message: yup 
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com 
Time: 02/18/17 02:54:40 PM (509151280) 
Flags: 1085445 
Is Read: No 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 9DA235A9-F6B3-4BEl-ABB7-3DD3015FFE38 
Message: you might want to attend kruase conference in tucson on 26th . i can organize 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 02:54:54 PM (509151294) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 427A0D05-4DDA-4AAA-B661-0BC5B8805F6C 
Message: Can only do after march 15 
Sender: + 
Time: 02/18/17 02:55:06 PM (509151306) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: CF7EC091-C6A8-42CC-AFAB-8FAD9E5BDC7A 
Message: But yes after that will do 100% 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 03:22:29 PM (509152949) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 7C2C0B57-0575-4BD8-8FBF-CD142A5D9603 
Message: Issue really is about how easy it is For fndns to spend tax dollars of 
Americans. Like how generous would they be if they had to spend their own money? Also 
- 1. All laws that apply to us foreign policy should be applied to charitable orgs 
spending us tax dollars. So the global gag rule should apply Across philanthropic 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027162 
dollars too. If ppl want to spend Personal money they can just Not charitable. This 
should be done immediately. 2. Should not be allowed to grant to foreign Gov't w 
Charitable dollars. That's basically lobbying or a bribe - charitable money shouldn't 
be allowed. Relates also to #1 above. 3. If charities want to spend charity dollars 
outside us should be required To go through USAid so it isn't being sneaky and on other 
agendas. 4. USAID should have a big charity division that does only this for Science 
and tech. 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 03:22:42 PM (509152962) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: B41E1124-2063-47AF-A5E6-DC788C54188F 
Message: Dont do this till we get cyber last 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 03:23:58 PM (509153038) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 6F080273-7588-4F80-97F4-6D663350C5CA 
Message: This would bring billions back To USA for social issues 
Sender: 
Time: 02/18/17 03:24:03 PM (509153043) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: F7769C41-2889-4C9D-BD79-1317411B7643 
Message: Immediately 
Sender: 
Time: 02/19/17 11:13:26 AM (509224406) 
Flags: 1126401 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
GUID: 2FBCOE00-E47D-4644-97D2-A3F423D65933 
Message: https://dev.commentarymagazine.com/articles/our-miserable-21st-century/ 
Sender: 
Time: 02/19/17 11:13:27 AM (509224407) 
Flags: 1060865 
Is Read: Yes 
Is Invitation: No 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027163 
GUID: FA315842-44CE-4FB6-ABD1-0FA6EDC2A391 
Message: Good article for trump to see 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 027164 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030434.txt,"﻿From: info@intelligencesquared.com
To: jeevacation@gmail.com; 
Subject: John Humphrys: The Terrier of Today, in conversation with Justin Webb
Sent: 7/9/2019 6:31:56 AM

View in browser <https://mailchi.mp/intelligencesquared/john-humphrys-the-terrier-of-today-694083?e=796428630f> 
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=5f049ea617&e=796428630f>  	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=2682c7a30c&e=796428630f>  	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=e54b58453c&e=796428630f>  	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=df11d50424&e=796428630f>  	
 <mailto:info@intelligencesquared.com.com>  	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=536eb51b01&e=796428630f> 	
	

John Humphrys:
The Terrier of Today <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=a685e3d882&e=796428630f> 

 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=6f4408db1d&e=796428630f> 	
ADD TO CALENDAR <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=3c810bf204&e=796428630f>  	
WEDNESDAY 9TH OCTOBER, 7PM
EMMANUEL CENTRE <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=f85f60bde3&e=796428630f> 
Featuring John Humphrys and Justin Webb
BUY TICKETS <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=91df146d3b&e=796428630f>  	
‘I’m not sure I’d like me if I was listening to me.’ – John Humphrys

John Humphrys is the Radio 4 Today programme presenter, whose forensic and sometimes aggressive interviews with figures in authority inspire love and loathing in equal measure. The Observer’s television critic once wrote that if he ever found himself sitting next to Humphrys at a dinner party he would probably drive a fork through his hand. The Tory politician Jonathan Aitken accused him of ‘poisoning the well of democratic debate’, a comment which prompted an outburst of support for Humphrys, with the Daily Mail describing him as ‘one of the most brilliant journalists in the country’.

This autumn, as Humphrys steps down after 32 years at Today and publishes a long-awaited memoir, he comes to the Intelligence Squared stage to give an exclusive, behind-the-scenes account of his extraordinary career.

Turning the tables on Humphrys and pitching the questions will be his Today colleague Justin Webb. Humphrys will recount the momentous episodes of his career, such as his interview with BBC correspondent Andrew Gilligan in 2003. Gilligan claimed that the government had deliberately ‘sexed up’ the dossier on the threat posed by Saddam Hussein in order to justify the Iraq War. A chain of events ensued, including the suicide of the dossier’s source, Dr David Kelly, severe damage to Tony Blair’s reputation and the Hutton and Chilcot inquiries into the war. And then there was the time Humphrys helped to get his own boss fired. His tough interview with the BBC Director General George Entwistle, days after the BBC had made false child abuse allegations against Lord McAlpine, lead to Entwistle’s resignation after a mere 53 days in the job.

Join us on October 9 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=25897124f4&e=796428630f>  and hear Humphrys’ previously untold stories about politicians, celebrities and the BBC, and give his trenchant views on the role of the media in politics and the health of our political system.
 
	
 <https://gallery.mailchimp.com/9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080/images/6121d150-af1e-49f1-b987-753fe8b37dfb.png> 	
 <https://gallery.mailchimp.com/9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080/images/a247af7a-125a-482c-aac1-bf5386dc11a9.png> 	
John Humphrys
Award-winning journalist who has been one of the presenters of BBC Radio 4's flagship news and current affairs programme Today since January 1987. During his career with the BBC, he has also worked as a foreign correspondent in both America and Africa, as well as being a diplomatic correspondent and presenter of the Nine O'Clock News. He has presented Panorama, fronts On the Ropes on Radio 4 and presents Mastermind on BBC Two. His has written two books on the English language, Lost For Words: The Mangling and Manipulating of the English Language and Beyond Words: How Language Reveals the Way We Live Now.
  	
 <https://gallery.mailchimp.com/9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080/images/c34b9cfc-ef6d-40c6-8f96-39634985be41.png> 	
 <https://gallery.mailchimp.com/9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080/images/fdf0a5b9-61e2-4853-834f-a3b76035be6c.png> 	
Justin Webb
One of the presenters of Radio 4’s Today programme. He was the BBC’s North America Editor for 8 years, covering the 9/11 attacks and the election of President Obama. He writes regularly for the Radio Times and reviews books for the Sunday Times.  	
	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=07dccab9db&e=796428630f> 	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=21a1c17a6a&e=796428630f> 	
Jeffrey Sachs on the End of American Supremacy <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=b168ff3e92&e=796428630f> 

Last month we were joined onstage by the University of Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Sachs, as he laid out his radical new vision for U.S. foreign policy. Instead of a world where America reigns as the sole superpower, Sachs argued for a new international system of equals, where America shares power and collaborates with former geopolitical rivals to solve today’s global crises.

Sachs was in conversation with the BBC’s Chief International Correspondent Lyse Doucet. 
LISTEN NOW <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=348ce84344&e=796428630f>  	
	
	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=2285f80e96&e=796428630f>  	Share <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=7e09708aab&e=796428630f>  	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=a7f4829f9b&e=796428630f>  	Tweet <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=3872a0ba58&e=796428630f>  	
 <http://us1.forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=420349ec58&e=796428630f>  	Forward <http://us1.forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=420349ec58&e=796428630f>  	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=dbf6d3d8d8&e=796428630f> 	
	
Intelligence Squared is proudly supported by its media partner:

 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=90f4882442&e=796428630f> 	
	
	






This email was sent to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com>  
why did I get this? <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/about?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=026e9ccdbd&e=796428630f&c=420349ec58>     unsubscribe from this list <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=026e9ccdbd&e=796428630f&c=420349ec58>     update subscription preferences <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/profile?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=026e9ccdbd&e=796428630f>  
Intelligence Squared (UK) Ltd · Newcombe House · 45 Notting Hill Gate, London W11 3LQ · United Kingdom 

	
 <https://intelligencesquared.us1.list-manage.com/track/open.php?u=9b096c9e607fbd256b4fab080&id=420349ec58&e=796428630f> 
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016133.txt,"Chart 20: Budgeted spending - up or down?

SARbn

Budgeted Defense & Security spending

350 ———% of total budgeted spending (rhs) 45

300
250
200
150
100
50
0

- mOmwore @O@wr MOH ke
[oo 7c. © °° no © ao © a ©) EE ©? ME ©? EE ©? EE ©)
mono Oo DOWD DD DBD DD BD
SS

Source: SAMA, Ministry of Finance, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Research.

2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015

Privatization comes back to the government’s agenda

The consideration of a privatization program is not surprising at the current juncture, in
our view. Recall that the Saudi privatization program was initially started in 1999 with
the creation of the now-dissolved Supreme Economic Council, following the drop in oil
prices in 1998. Small-scale privatizations took place in the early 2000s, and 2002 saw
large privatization in the telecommunication sector and postal services.

Selling public sector stakes is one of the non-debt creating financing options for the
government that would help minimize the direct drain on Fx reserves, encourage private
sector development and improve services delivery. That being said, given the lack of
non-oil taxation, this would only contribute to one-off financing flows alongside savings
from a drop in budgetary allocations to the privatized entities, in our view.

The 2015 budgetary appropriations for public institutions totalled SAR163.7bn
(USS43.7bn; 19.0% of total budgeted spending and 6.8% of GDP). We calculate that the
public institutions related to the entities that appear to have been slated for
privatization according to press reports account for budgetary appropriations of
SAR124.8bn (US$33.3bn; 5.2% of GDP. This is likely to be the upper bound of fiscal
savings possible under the privatization program. In our view, this is unlikely to be
realized fully as it includes a large number of universities and because most timelines

appear to center around 2020.

Table 9: Privatization / Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) planned

Entity Date
Airports 2016-2020
Saudi General Grains Organisation 1Q17
Saudi Aramco by 2018
Stock exchange (Tadawul) by 2018

Saudia Medical Services -

Saudi Electricity (SEC) by 2020
Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC) -
General Port Authority by 2020
Saudi Post by 2020
Education / schools -
Healthcare / hospitals

Road, railway and port projects

Source: Press reports, Saudi Vision 2030, National Transformation Plan

Comment (press reports and Saudi Vision 2030/NTP, unless stated otherwise)

Targeted sale of 11 airport units by 2020

A financial advisor has been appointed

A stake of less than 5% could be sold

A financial advisor has been appointed

Saudi Arabian Airlines appointed a financial adviser for the privatization of its unit Saudia Medical Services and had its
Board of Directors restructured in June

SEC's generation assets are likely to be split into four separate regional companies where minority stakes would be sold to
major global utilities or sold in the public market

Investment partners are likely to be sought to buy a stake in production assets, with the holding company to be listed later
Commercialization program to be completed by 2020

Saudi Post to be turned into a holding company with six subsidiaries. The NTP aims to transform it to a commercially viable
company with government subsidies (SAR2bn) to be phased out by 2020.

Official pronouncements have suggested this could be considered, but there does not appear to be concrete plans for now
The 2030 vision suggests no privatisations in the near-term, in our view. Authorities are likely to look to improve
management and quality of service before considering privatisation, in our view.

NTP suggests PPPs are planned with percentage in private sector contribution to development and operation to increase

OS Merrill Lynch

GEMs Paper #26 | 30 June 2016 23

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016133
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018751.txt,"Ray
wat i

er

a
a 4

3 = - :
RETAILERS T0 THE SOUTH RETAILERS T0 THE NORTH

te ths es

Ermenegildo Zegna TIFFANY&CO. LOUISVUITION 2x Sto2m BVLGARI

i ark
GUCCI (Crter FENDI uwermes Dior PRADA MIKIMOTO

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018751
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013402.txt,"Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages

judgment on basis of facts established without dispute). Where the nonmoving party fails to
present evidence rebutting the motion for summary judgment and there is no genuine issue of
material fact, then entry of judgment is proper as a matter of law. See Davis v. Hathaway, 408
So. 2d 688, 689 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1982); see also Holl, 191 So. 2d at 43. Faced with these
well-established legal principles, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards on
the eve of the hearing on Edwards Motion for Summary Judgment.

B. Epstein’s Claim Regarding Edwards Had Absolutely No Factual Basis.

~~ This was not a complicated case: for granting summary judgment: To. the contrary; ‘the

-=“umcontested record clearly established: that~each and“ everyone ofEpstein’s-claims against

Edwards lacked any merit whatsoever.'

I Epstein’s allegations regarding Edwards’ involvement in Rothstein’s “Ponzi
Scheme” were unsupported and unsupportable because Edwards was simply
' not involved in any such scheme.** -- ~ - : “
a. Edwards Had No Involvement in the Ponzi Scheme.

The bulk of Epstein’s claims against Edwards hinged on the premise that Edwards was
involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein. Broad allegations of wrongdoing on the part
of Edwards were scattered willy-nilly throughout the complaint. None of the allegations
provided any substance as to how Edwards actually assisted the Ponzi scheme, and allegations

that he “knew or should have known” of its existence are based upon an impermissible

pyramiding of inferences. In any event, these allegations all fail for one straightforward reason:

' The dismissal of Epstein’s claims against Edwards did not affect Epstein’s claims against Scott Rothstein. Epstein
had already chosen to dismiss all of his claims against L.M., the only other defendant named in the suit.

9

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013402
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026256.txt,"From: Steve Bannon 
Sent: 2/24/2018 1:21:54 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - 
POLITICO 
Importance: High 
Populist/Nationalist first 
Conservative Christians (catholic/evangelical) next 
Reverse alabama 
This coalition staves off ""times up"" for next decade plus 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
From: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:18:09 -0500 
To: Steve Bannon 
Subject: Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with 
Trump team - POLITICO 
should it have a christian component? tithe? if you form a church you may be able to tell mueller you have a 
confession privelege. :) 
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Steve Bannon - 
On it 
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 
> wrote: 
From: ""jeffrey E."" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:13:08 -0500  
To: Steve Bannon<____________________ 
Subject: Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with 
Trump team - POLITICO 
coin issues. : receive coins, distribute coins, pay in coins, coin cooperative, prohibitions foreign donor.? 
need to understand flow of funds. . donor to campiagn c?s. does it have to go to campaign first. . does it 
have to go there at all etc. 
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Steve Bannon li wrote: 
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-
michael-flynn-trump-423437  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026256 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026257 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018989.txt,"Date: 7/13/06 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 36

Time: 9:27:55 Incident Report Program: CMS301L
Case No. .. . : 1-05-000368 (Continued)
Det. Dawson and I then left the area and responded to the
where FEB and all the above-mentioned girls had b6
attended. I met with School Police Officer, Off Williams. I b7Cc

explained I was looking for a previous_student who attended | _____]
CY I inquired about | I further explained
that I was working a case in which most of the girls I have
interviewed are either witnesses or victims and felt that [ __l may be
one as well. Officer Williams researched his previous student records
and found She attended the same year and graduated
in the same_year_as the other girls. I was provided the last known
address off.
At approximately 2:10 pm, Det. Dawson and I met with at
her residence, in Royal Palm Beach. As was
only seventeen years of age, I had notified her mother,
[| that she would be interviewed reference an ongoing
investigation in Palm Beach. I assured her that her daughter was not
a suspect. I explained the possibility of_her being either a witness
or victim. Mrs. — advised she wanted to cooperate and
consented to the interview. During a sworn taped statement,

stated the following: at the age of sixteen, during the month of
September 2004, she was approached by MMMM f0or a chance to

make money. was friends with the friends of Le er and knew the
same people. had been previously told by her friends what
MMMM did for Jeff. MMMM called a person known to[ |] as
and scheduled the appointment. [EBB picked up and drove her

to Palm Beach to a street called Brillo Way. They drove to the end of
the street and entered a large driveway. They entered the kitchen
area of the_house and met with Jeff. To Twas introduced to Jeff.
He led [ upstairs to the main bedroom area and set up the room
with a massage table and set out the oils. [EBBRBENS dimmed the lights
and turned on soft music. MMMM exited the room and Jeff entered the
room wearing only a towel. Jeff picked oils and instructed her to rub
his legs, under his buttocks, back and chest area. Jeff asked her to
get comfortable. advised she did not remove her clothes. She
was’ wearing tight jeans and a cropped tank top exposing her belly
area. During the massage, Jeff removed his towel. as] rubbed
his chest area, Jeff attempted to reach down her pants through the
buttocks area, however_was unable to due to the tightness of the jeans
and a tight belt. advised Jeff began to masturbate as she
rubbed his chest. Jeff moaned as she rubbed his chest. She observed
he was continuing to masturbate and attempted to reach up her tank top
and touch her breasts. [[__] pulled back and Jeff stopped. However,
he kept masturbating until he climaxed. He cleaned himself with the
towel he was previously wearing. I asked[___]if she knew the
difference between circumcised and not circumcised. She explained she
knew and advised Jeff was circumcised. [__|was paid $200.00 for the
massage and left the area. She met with who was waiting in the
kitchen area and left the house.

LC] then explained she never provided another masead® for Jeff. She

did however, go to the house with EJ and as they

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018989
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029165.txt,"﻿	The Special Counsel's office, nearly leak-proof since its inception more than a year ago and seemingly immune to the President's constant taunts, might appear to be operating in some parallel universe unmoved by the every-day political turmoil. But in the course of conversations I've had recently, as a I research a new book on President Trump and the forces arrayed against him, what has become clear is that Robert Mueller and his office are preparing for a life or death confrontation with the President and the mother of all constitutional crises.
	My discussions have been with both White House advisors and people close to the investigation. No source involved in this story would speak on the record. But one source allowed me to review some of the documents related to the Special Counsel's strategy. Aspects of the Special Counsel's strategy have been confirmed by both White House sources and lawyers closely involved with the Justice Department. 
	Since at least April the Special Counsel has had in place proposed charges, a bill of particulars, and an aggressive legal theory for the indictment of the president for obstruction of Justice. In the last few weeks, as the President has indulged his pardon authority, the Mueller team has also developed a legal strategy to oppose what the Special Counsel believes will be a likely pardon of former National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn, who had previously struck a plea bargain which could include his testimony against the President.
	Robert Mueller, according to one person familiar with the Special Counsel's thinking, could hardly contain his disgust when Rudy Giuliani, the President's new lawyer—hired to makes a television case for the President and to push back against the Mueller team—in May airily dismissed the notion that a president can be indicted. Adding insult to injury, Giuliani—who a White House source said had likely learned of aspects of the pending indictment—said Mueller agreed with that assessment. White House sources believe Giuliani was daring the Special Counsel to tip his hand. Mueller, in character, contained his outrage and continued to hold his cards close as his team finished preparing the obstruction case and refined the legal theories under which it would claim the right to haul the president into court.
	At this point, the case for indictment has, in effect, a judge of one. The Mueller team, according to sources both near the investigation and the White House, has prepared the case, but it requires the approval of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who—with the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions from the Russia-related investigation—oversees the Mueller team. Indeed, Rosenstein, as recently as April, publicly declared that the President was not a target. This may have been a form of fig leaf to soothe a President who regularly demands aides assure him he is not being pursued: the President does not become a formal target until Rosenstein agrees to designate him as one.
	The proposed indictment confronts Rosenstein with matters with which he has been intimately involved. The case, according to my conversations with White House and other sources familiar with the investigation, is fundamentally Trump versus the FBI, Justice Department, and Mueller investigation itself. In many ways, it boils down to the word of former FBI Director James Comey against the word of Donald Trump. Rosenstein, at the President's behest, drafted a memo justifying the Comey firing for how the former FBI Director handled the Hillary Clinton email investigation. But that justification, in an embarrassment for Rosenstein, was shortly brushed aside by the President when he admitted that he fired Comey to disrupt the Russian investigation. What's more, the indictment is said to charge that the firing of Andrew McCabe, the former Deputy Director of the FBI, who reported directly to Rosenstein after the Comey dismissal, was an instance of illegal retaliation by the President against a potential witness.
	According to a source with knowledge of the proposed indictment, it will be all the more controversial because if finds the entire narrative of the case for obstruction in plain sight. Almost nothing about the case involves new information. ""This indictment could have been drafted without anyone being interviewed,"" said this source. Rather it takes well covered public events and moves them to a set of circumstantial conclusions. There is no smoking gun beyond the often flagrant, custom-breaking, events of the President's 16 months in office. Indeed, much of the evidence is based on the President's public statements and tweets about those events.
	This is, according to White House sources who have gotten wind of this approach, good news: the case then, is just an issue of what motives you ascribe to the President's behavior—behavior that is, the President's supporters believe it is easy to show, impulsive and not thought out. Hence no intent. For the Mueller team, it is precisely that careless behavior and flagrant disregard for the rules that they aim to put on trial.
	There is no certainty that the Special Counsel's office will ultimately pursue its plan to indict the President. But, according to a source involved in the legal strategy, the plan is ""more advanced"" than it was when the indictment was drafted in April. The investigation continues and new evidence or other factors might push both prosecutors and the grand jury in another direction. Just passing its first anniversary, the Mueller investigation has conducted itself with remarkable secrecy. Descriptions of the proposed indictment provide one of the few insights into its strategy and its sense of the political peril in front of it.
	It may be noteworthy that there appears now not to be plan for an indictment related to collusion, although, legal experts say, that could come later.
	The White House view is that without the underlying collusion charge, Mueller will be presenting a weak and politically-motivated case. The Mueller view seems to be that the obstruction charges go to the heart of exposing how Trump has abused his power and turned the White House into a corrupt fiefdom.

	The President's scheme to obstruct the FBI's investigation into connections between the Trump campaign and Russian efforts to undermine the U.S. election, according to the Mueller indictment, began on the 7th day of the Trump administration. Three days prior to this, on January 24, National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn, lied to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian Ambassador, Sergey Kislyak. These were contacts, directed by an unnamed but ranking member of the Presidential Transition team. 
	That unnamed person, in the view of several lawyers who discussed the case with me, is very likely Trump himself, and might imply that Trump encouraged Flynn to lie to the FBI, promising to protect him—using his influence or pardon powers.
	On January 27th, seven days after Donald Trump's inauguration, the President had the one-on-one dinner with FBI Director James Comey—recounted in Comey's congressional testimony and in his recent book, ""A Higher Loyalty""—at which the President asked Comey if he ""wanted to stay on as FBI Director."" The President then requested a loyalty pledge in an effort, according to Comey's testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, to ""create some sort of patronage relationship""—a characterization the indictment accepts.
	Flynn resigned on February 13. The next day, the President cleared a meeting of its other attendees and privately asked Comey to ""let this go, to let Flynn go."" The indictment accepts Comey's understanding that the President was ""requesting that [the FBI] drop any investigation of Flynn in connection with false statements about his conversations with the Russian ambassador in December."" 
	On March 30, 2017, ten days after Comey told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the FBI was investigating links between the President's campaign and the Russian government, the President asked Comey to ""lift the cloud"" of the Russian investigation, further telling Comey that the investigation was creating problems for him and expressing the ""hope"" that Comey ""would find a way to get it out that [the FBI] [wasn't] investigating him.""
	On April 11, according to the indictment, the President asked the FBI Director what he ""had done about this request that [Comey] 'get out' that [the President] is not personally under investigation,"" saying that ""the cloud"" was ""getting in the way of his ability to do his job."" Comey asked the President to send his request to the appropriate parties at the Department of Justice. The President agreed but reminded Comey that he had been ""very loyal to you [Comey], very loyal; we had that thing, you know.""
	On May 9, the President fired Comey, publicly saying  that the ""Russian thing"" played a role in his decision to fire the FBI Director. The next day, the President said he'd ""faced great pressure because of Russia,"" and as a result of the firing, that pressure had been ""taken off.""
	On May 17, soon after learning about the appointment of the Special Counsel by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein—in his role as acting Attorney General, after the recusal of Attorney General Jefferson Sessions—the President accused Sessions of ""disloyalty"" for recusing himself from the Russian investigation. In June 2017, the indictment alleges, the President ordered Robert Mueller to be fired, reversing course only when the White House counsel, Don McGahn, refused to implement the order. 
	On July 8, after reports of a meeting between the President's son, Donald Trump, Jr., and a Russian agent, Natalia Veselnitskaya, during the 2016 campaign, the President, in furtherance of a cover-up, the indictment alleges, directed his son to state that he and Veselnitskaya had ""primarily discussed a program about the adoption of children,"" when, in fact, according to the indictment, the meeting was organized so that ""Russia and its government"" could provide the Presidential campaign with ""official documents and information that would incriminate"" Hillary Clinton, the presumed Democratic candidate for President.
	According to the indictment, by June 7, 2017, news outlets were reporting that the Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, could corroborate James Comey's allegation that the President had asked for Comey's loyalty before firing him. As part of the cover-up, the indictment alleges, on July 26, 2017, the President called upon the Attorney General to fire McCabe.
	On December 21, 2017, McCabe testified before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the President had in fact asked Comey for his loyalty before firing him. Six days later, in retaliation, the President tweeted that McCabe was ""racing the clock to retire with full benefits,"" and implying by use of a question mark, that it was uncertain whether McCabe had ""90 days to go?!!!""
	On March 16, 2018, McCabe was dismissed, depriving him of his pension. According to the indictment, the President directed McCabe to be fired with the intent to threaten and retaliate against him, the FBI, and the Office of the Special Counsel, ""or to impede their respective abilities to assist or carry out the work of the FBI, DOJ, the Office of the Special Counsel, the Congressional Intelligence Committees, and the grand jury.""
	Together with its narrative of Presidential behavior with, it contends, the certain intention of subverting ongoing investigations, the Mueller office is also ready to argue its right and obligation to charge a sitting president with a criminal violation. 
	It is the outline of this argument that White House sources say both prompted Rudy Giuliani to scoff at the idea of indictment and, several weeks later, for the President and his lawyer to make sweeping claims about Presidential authority. 
	It is a coming battle of absolutist positions.
	The Special Counsel, according to reports from both the investigation and from the White House, has spelled out an argument—one that appears to be at odds with Department of Justice standing policy that precludes charging a sitting president with a crime—that nothing in the Constitution or in an statute suggests a status with regard to criminal prosecution for the President different from any other federal office. Nor is there any statute or case law that finds that impeachment has to come before an indictment. The Mueller team dismisses the argument made most aggressively by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz—who offers frequent legal advice to the President both in person and via television—and repeated recently by the President, and in the recently revealed letter sent by his lawyers to the Special Counsel in January, that a president cannot be prosecuted for exercising his constitutional prerogatives, even if they foster crimes. Again, the team argues that there is no statute or constitutional authority that puts the President above the law or that allows him to contribute to breaking the law.
	Curiously, the tradition breakers in the White House—supported by a many lawyers, both right and left leaning—now argue that the President's traditional and constitutionally mandated executive powers give him wide latitude for how he carries out his duties. ""I don't think you are going to find a court who will not see the president's role as unique,"" said one White House advisor. ""The Mueller theories are wishful thinking.""
	Such an indictment is described in similar ways by both Mueller and White House insiders: it puts the President's public behavior on trial. The nature of that behavior, for the Mueller team, is corrupt; this, according to the White House, is how voters elected the President to behave.

	The Mueller team may have a high hurdle in convincing Rosenstein to approve the indictment. Giuliani recently put standing DOJ policy against the indictment of a president in hyperbolic terms: the President could kill James Comey if he wanted to without fear of prosecution. But, according to one former senior DOJ lawyer, Rosenstein in this circumstance may have the power to override the DOJ guidelines. The Mueller team appears to believe that Rosenstein's pledge before congress that, absent malfeasance, he will support the Special Counsel's independence with regard to the Russian investigation, means he will let the indictment go forward. In one view—and in the suspicion of some in the White House—he may have already authorized Mueller to proceed with the indictment.
	The counsel's office does, however, according to the papers I have reviewed, worry about the possibility that Trump will replace Rosenstein with someone who will fire Mueller or curtail the investigation. Indeed, the Mueller investigation seems concerned or shadowed by daily procedural questions of an existential nature—anticipating its own demise and what consequences that might bring. 
	It believes that in the inevitable Supreme Court battle that would follow a direct attempt by the President to fire the Special Counsel, the Court would surely rebuff such an expansion of Presidential authority. At the same time, according to its internal research, the Mueller team understands that the President, acting with only somewhat more subtlety, would have the authority to order the Attorney General—even given his prior recusal—to repeal the Special Counsel regulations and close down the investigation, and fire the Attorney General if he refuses. The President, could, too, according to the Special Counsel's analysis, fire Rosenstein and seek someone else to oversee the investigation in ways more to his liking. Both of these actions could, the Special Counsel believes, become part of the behavior that it argues in the indictment amounts to a prima facie case for obstruction of justice. 
	The team does yet believe it is protected by political realities—the President can not know how Congress might respond—and by bureaucratic ones. Changes to the Special Counsel authorization might require an extended comment period.
	Still, what if the President acting unilaterally does shut it down? This, people around the President say is the unknown legal area that might be advantageous to the President. Delays and disruption might well be the President's legal friends. 
	What, for instance, happens to all the work the Special Counsel's office had done, and, indeed, to the sitting Grand Juries reviewing the evidence? The special counsel's view, according to insiders working on the issues, is that nobody knows. The optimistic legal view is that the Office and staff would survive the Special Counsel's ouster and their work preserved. And that actions taken by the Grand Jury would remain in effect.
	This, however, would probably not be true if the Attorney General refused the next Special Counsel's budget request—due on July 1. That would shut down the whole operation—the Special Counsel staff and grand juries. There might, however, according to research the team has prepared, be enough time between the order and the shuttering for the Special Counsel to share the grand jury evidence with other federal prosecutors.
	The President's constitutional pardon powers appear to be some of the most troubling and threatening issues for the Special Counsel. The Counsel's office believes the President will use his pardon power as an instrument to undermine the investigation.
	According to present and former White House advisors, the President's recent spates of pardons are in part his way of taunting the Special Counsel. The White House, according to these sources, is aware that the Special Counsel has concluded the pardon power is near absolute: the President can certainly pardon himself, and others involved in the investigation. 
	Early in June, the Special Counsel, believing that a pardon for Michael Flynn was imminent, rushed to build a case that might form an exception to the President's pardon authority. The argument, perhaps a slim thread one, tries to undermine what both the White House and many outside legal authorities, and much of the Special Counsel's own research, believes to be one of the few unchallengeable powers granted the President. In effect, the Special Counsel continues the theme of it's case: there is a level of obstruction of justice that all reasonable men might know when they see it. If you pardon someone to get yourself off the hook, that's a ""corrupt"" action. Since the President is in charge of upholding the constitution and much of the constitution is about preventing corrupt acts, the pardon, in the case of Michael Flynn, is unconstitutional. What's more, since there is an impeachment process in place—or there at least several impeachment resolutions before congress—and impeachment is the province of Congress, a pardon of a potential witness in this impeachment is an unconstitutional trampling on the separation of powers.

	As the President, by nature and design, tries to claim aggressive new powers, the Mueller team, almost in equal proportion, is trying to limit the theory of Presidential power and, even, to criminalize an expansive exercise of those powers. 
	People who know and have worked with Mueller find it, at best, unexpected that such a traditional, and by the book, G-man, would be pursuing such far-reaching legal theories. One view, shared by the White House, is that Mueller is overly reliant on his staff. In this scenario, the legal charge is being led by his number two, Andrew Weissman, the aggressive prosecutor whose pursuit of the accounting firm Arthur Anderson in the Enron debacle end in its conviction—a judgement reversed well after the firm's bankrupcy and dissolution. Weissman is a particular bet noir and favorite whipping boy for the White House. 
	But in another view it is precisely because Mueller, a former Marine, is so by the book and Semper Fi that he finds Trump's behavior to be personally offensive, and, on its face, corrupt. ""Bob Mueller is all about limits and rules. Donald Trump has none and acknowledges none.""
	It may yet be even a more profound clash then that, the executive branch at war with itself—the Justice Department against the White House.
	Indeed, it is a war strategy, in the view of some legal observers. Such an indictment would be litigated to the hilt. It would force both the substantive issues of obstruction and abuse of power and the meta issues of Presidential immunity—the hot button issues of the President's claims to being above the law—into open court for a long and painful review and dissection that might shadow the November election. 
	Legal experts believe that the Mueller team might well prevail in lower courts with a less likely, but not at all certain outcome, in the Supreme Court. 
	""Might such an expansive claim win, yes. Should it win, no. But everyone knows the reality: weak president's lose cases, strong president's win them.""
	Were the case to reach the Supreme Court after the November election, it might well be the results of that election that help seal the President's fate not just in Congress but also in the courts.




	MORE TK






"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030943.txt,"Grant_Smith080168%eMailContent.htm

Walton's blanket defense of the Commission has made the Feds conclude he is a fool or co-conspirator.

The FBI just needs the evidence and not much of it. To quote the late Supreme Court Justice William.
Brennan: “""any prosecutor worth his salt could indict a ham sandwich."""" ’ .

This means all evidence, regardless of its ambiguous nature, will be interpreted to support their
assumption of wrongdoing.

~ They will be using software to go through millions of E-mail messages to look for key words. As Buddy
has quoted me: """"The 'E' in E-mail stands for evidence.""

Six months from now 7 iey uncover an ere from the County Manager to Walton stating that
‘Commissioner X wants to know if the bid of company Y for new busses was correctly filled out. He
replies that it was.

Months later he has totally forgotten about the innocuous E-mail. Based on the merits, he happens to
rank Y's bid number one.

You can bet as sure as J. Edgar Hoover wore pink poodle skirts, the FBI will conclude this was code
from Commissioner X to Walton to vote for Y.

- Armed with the E-mail you can be damnes sure that the G-Men will be back threatening him with
everything including a stint in Gitmo.

All of this might have been avoided if he had followed my three basic rules.
Memorize them.

1. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer.

2. Do not talk to the FBI without a lawyer.

3. Do not talk to the FBI without a law

Grant J. Smith, Esq.

Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler

file:///C|//Documents%20and%20Settings/T rial/Desktop/e.. -uction/eDocs/eMail/Grant_, Smith080168*eMailContent.htm (4 of 5) [1 1/6/2010 10:16:53 PM]
, 14543.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030943 -
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023889.txt,"Defining Intelligence 143

Interviewer: Some of the viewers think there’s not enough oil.

Man with cap: We got us self-sufficient energy gas oil right
under our feet. Why aren’t we exploring more for it and
drilling here instead of sending all that money overseas and
exporting, I mean importing, all that oil back to America?

Interviewer: Do you hope she runs for president in 2012?

Man with cap: Yes, I do.

Interviewer: You will support her?

Man with cap: I sure would.

Interviewer: Do you think there will be any problems supporting
her, knowing that you’re unfamiliar with her foreign policy
issues?

Man with cap: That wouldn’t keep me from not voting for her.

There is a difference between ignorance and stupidity, just as there is a
difference between knowledge and intelligence. It is a good guess that
the “man with cap” above is both stupid and ignorant. The question
is why?

One reason is that it is now acceptable in our society to be ignorant
and stupid. Here is some of the famous ABC/Charles Gibson interview
with Sarah Palin during the 2008 presidential campaign:

Gibson: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?

Palin: In what respect, Charlie?

Gibson: The Bush—well, what do you—what do you interpret it
to be?

Palin: His worldview.

Gibson: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002,
before the Iraq war.

Palin: I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do
is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are
hellbent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders
along the way, though. There have been mistakes made.

And with new leadership, and that’s the beauty of American
elections, of course, and democracy, is with new leadership
comes opportunity to do things better.

Gibson: The Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the
right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right to a
preemptive strike against any other country that we think is
going to attack us. Do you agree with that?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023889
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017994.txt,"attieO18 Case 1:19-t- 036 Frio boca mierrretesed PeeO4)/ PONP9! | Peaigwas fingon

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition, the judge before whom the accusation was made struck the accusation from the
record and sanctioned her lawyers for filing it. One of her own lawyers then acknowledged that

9 66

his client was “wrong” “simply wrong,” and her other lawyers formally withdrew the accusation,

admitting it was a “mistake.”

Not only did Virginia Roberts lie about me, she lied about Al and Tipper Gore and President Bill
Clinton claiming that she met the three of them on Jeffrey Epstein’s island — a claim refuted by
secret service records that established that none of the three were on that island during that
period of time.

There is evidence that directly proves I was framed. These include emails between Roberts and a
journalist, a book manuscript by Roberts and a legal brief that are smoking guns showing that I
was “deliberately framed for financial reasons.” These exculpatory documents have been sealed
by Roberts’ lawyers and I am seeking to make them public.

Roberts’ closest friend told me that Roberts told her she “felt pressure to go after [Dershowitz]”
in order to obtain money from Leslie Wexner and that Roberts had never previously included
me among the people with whom she claimed to have had sex. I have a tape recording of this
conversation.

Not surprisingly, Roberts made her false claims against me only in court documents that
immunize her from being sued for defamation. When she was interviewed by the Miami Herald,
she refused to repeat her false allegations outside of court. The Crimson did not ask her directly
to repeat her false allegations to them. As a matter of journalistic ethics, The Crimson should
not have published an accusation without interviewing the accuser on the record. I now
challenge Roberts to repeat her false accusations to The Crimson or other media, so that I can
sue her for defamation and let a jury decide — after seeing all the evidence including the emails
and book manuscript — who is telling the truth and who is lying.

I want an investigation or trial to finally prove that Roberts made up the entire story, so that it
can finally be put to rest.

Alan M. Dershowitz is a Professor of Law emeritus at Harvard Law School.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

httns:/Awww thecrimson com/article/2018/12/5/letter-dershowit7-misrenresention/ 212

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017994
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031485.txt,"""We have read concerns from Turkey that Mr. Gulen, this elderly, frail
religious leader, is going to flee to another country,"" said Steptoe &
Johnson LLP attorney Reid Weingarten on Friday, calling such
allegations ""absurd.""

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan has blamed Gulen for the violence,
in which Erdogan said 237 people were killed excluding the plotters
and more than 2,100 wounded, and said the United States should
extradite him to Turkey. The U.S. government has not done so, and
the dispute has raised questions about relations between the two allies.

Turkey, a member of the NATO alliance, hosts American troops and
warplanes at Incirlik Air Base, an important staging area for the U.S.-
led fight against Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

At a news conference in Washington, Weingarten and Michael Miller,
another Steptoe attorney, said evidence from a 2015 case financed by
the Turkish government against Gulen in U.S. federal court in
Pennsylvania showed that the Turkish government relies on dubious
proof to make its case against him.

That case alleged Gulen issued coded orders to followers in the
Turkish judiciary in a 2009 sermon to persecute members of another
religious sect. It also alleged that the script of a popular Turkish
television show was laced with follow-up messages. The case was
dismissed by a judge in June.

Turkish government officials, however, say such evidence is valid
because Gulen operates covertly and sends encoded messages to his
followers.

Turkey has sent the United States new documents in recent days
containing evidence that Turkish authorities say proves the cleric was

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031485
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020711.txt,"Image source: yuyamika7

#14 Monica Bellucci

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020711
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025503.txt,"Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: E656159D-BB63-4C52-8E9B-4E670C5786C4

Message: But in China, the yuan slipped to its weakest this year after the country's
imports fell the most in nearly three years and as talks to end the Sino-U.S. dispute
remained deadlocked.

Sender: iii

Time: 06/10/19 03:47:18 AM (581856438)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: FISIA2F5-574C-4E07-83E1-57C02153F141

Message: What interviews ?

Time: 06/10/19 03:59:54 AM (581857194)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: C245095D-51A7-4034-B969-58ADE1B2F322

Message: Is the Kazak movie any good???

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/10/19 04:14:13 AM (581858053)
Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8A206BDA-CO0O0D-4D45-922E-O0EBE14868C6

Message: The last two filming with you

Sender: Po

Time: 06/10/19 04:15:01 AM (581858101)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: D4C1C566-CD4C-4776-8568-76D857D0F436

Message: They are all out of sequence some from months ago -- Wuxi ones

Sender: 7
Time: 06/10/19 04:15:06 AM (581858106)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025503
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027985.txt,"from the SEALs in getting ashore, only one required direct co-ordination with
us. This was an attack on a DFLP building a mile or so away in southern Beirut,
led by Amnon Lipkin, the friend whose unit had faced one of the toughest
battles at Karameh. Amnon’s paratroop force would land with us and also pile
into Mossad rental cars. Our attacks would begin at the same time, with the
maximum prospect of retaining the advantage of surprise. When and if we both
completed the operations and got away safely, we would meet up again on the
seafront.

From our first meeting, the morning after Dado gave me the go-ahead, I
realized I would have to make at least one change to the plan to rely on the core
Sabena team. There was no way, after his exclusion from the hijack rescue
mission, that I could refuse Yoni when he pressed to be included. I added him to
Mookie Betzer’s force. I put the other two attack teams under a pair of young
officers named Amitai Nachmani and Zvika Gilad. Both were self-confident,
natural leaders. Both had other qualities I also knew we’d need: focus, and
calm. I would take charge on the street outside the targeted apartments, along
with Amiram Levin. With us would be Dov Bar, a Shayetet 13 officer, and our
medic, Shmuel Katz.

In the hangar at the sayeret base, we made mock-ups of the layout of the
apartments, using bedsheets for the walls and adjusting the dimensions as
further bits of intelligence came in from Mossad. But the real work involved
simulating the whole operation, from the moment of our landing on jet-black
rubber dinghies piloted by the SEALs. We found a new building development
in north Tel Aviv with a pair of apartment blocks under construction. For two
nights, we ran through the whole thing: setting off in the dinghies from a missile
boat off the Israeli coast before midnight, meeting up with our Mossad drivers
on shore, making our way through the center of Tel Aviv to the apartment
complexes and simulating the attack. I wanted to ensure we could pull off the
whole thing without anyone raising an alarm. The one problem came during the
second run-through. A policeman drove by as we were “attacking” the
apartments. Dado managed to convince him that reporting us to his superiors
would not be an especially good idea.

In our debriefing discussions after that exercise, Dado identified a major
problem I’d overlooked. We would be entering Beirut dressed as civilians. Once
we got to the top end of Rue Verdun, we planned to approach the apartments as
if we were party-goers returning from a night on the town. “It doesn’t look
right,” Dado said. “More than a dozen party people walking, all men?” Mookie

137
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027985
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023651.txt,"China and now we work with them on a huge initiative in the Industrial city of Jizan and there are other
countries come successively.

* Does this will include the development of ports?

- That is true. developing seaports or participate in the industrial cities on the Red Sea. Another
opportunity we're working on is a Saudi and Gulf states exports to Europe, 40% of Saudi Arabia and the
Gulf states exports to Europe. Especially, the Gulf countries pass from the Arabian Gulf to the Strait of
Hormuz to the Arabian Sea to Bab El Mandeb to the Red Sea to the Suez Canal to the Mediterranean Sea
and this period takes the cost and security risk, while we can provide them passage through Saudi Arabia
directly to the bridge of the King Salman, who announced it last year to North Sinai, which reduces the
time and cost. Where security guarantees are much higher than those in which they pass.

* Are you involved in the King Salman Bridge project?

- Without a doubt, this will create a lot of industries and businesses inside Saudi Arabia from connecting
roads, connecting power grids, linking gas and oil pipelines, and connecting railways to North Sinai. The
third opportunity we aim at in Logistics is aviation, today our brothers in the United Arab Emirates and in
Qatar have done a very good job of flying in the Middle East, while they do not have a strong domestic
market to rely on to take over and control the Middle East markets. Saudi Arabia has the largest
domestic market as an airline market. Saudi Airlines companies should have a much larger stake in the
Middle East Airlines today, this is also the third aspect we seek.

* What are the reasons for the absence of the Saudi aviation, is the weakness of the airports is the
reason?

- The absence of strategy, there is no strategy and no vision. The tendency was a random move until we
reached the stage we reached today, while if you set a goal and plans to reach this goal there will be an
achievement of these results up to 100% or 50% or 30%. Briefly, the fund will be the main driver of the
major sectors within Saudi Arabia. The fund will have a very large cash flow from Aramco and this will be
directed in no less than 50% and up to 70% in new sectors within Saudi Arabia (mining, local content,
logistics). After covering opportunities within Saudi Arabia, the remaining 50% and 30% will be directed
to outside Saudi Arabia to the promising sectors that are possible to be in the forefront ten years from
today, and. Details for all of this will be announced in the launch of the program of the Public Investment
Fund in accurate and detailed manner.

* When the project was announced cash; people reacted that they wanted the habitation, what the
opinion of Your Highness?

- We have so many fronts we are working on them, and we cannot then stop a certain entity that
achieved an achievement because there is a delay in the other side. It will disrupt the work of the whole
government, it is imposed on all sides to support, stimulate and reach an achievement, and the one that
is delayed is to be investigated about the delay and its reasons and how we work on it. This is a side, the
other side that spend on the public investment fund is not the state. It is one of the fund's unexploited
assets. In the past, it was giving us a profit of 1%, and at the best case 2.5%, and there are bonds and
funds outside the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Today, we transfer these amounts to Saudi Arabia and we
invest in sectors that give a profit of better than 2.5% or 1%, develop key sectors and contribute to the
local content on the entertainment side. Ultimately, this will create profits for the Fund, the Fund will

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023651
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032924.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 11/20/2016 6:53:17 PM 
To: Ken Starr 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
great great anytime at your convenience or you can come to the house, 
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Ken Starr < > wrote: 
Fabulous! May I buy you lunch? 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:32 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I'll be there wed 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM Ken Starr < > wrote: 
And to you as well. We'll be at the Breakers en famille as of Tuesday evening.. Any chance to see you in 
the Sunshine State? 
Hugs, Ken 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:48 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Ken Starr < > wrote: 
Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board. 
Hope you're well. Best, Ken 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise? 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Ken Starr ‹> wrote: 
Darn. On a cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election 
cruise. Bad timing on our part. 
We'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there. 
Many thanks. 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , i can organize. anytime with wife your 
call. otherwise new york dec. 6-9? \ 
interesting times. http ://www. dailymail. co .uk/news/article-3914012/Troub led-woman-history-drug-
use-claime d-assaulte d-D onald- Trump -Jeffrey-Ep stein-sex-p arty-age-13 -FABRICATED-story. html  
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032924 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Ken Starr < > wrote: 
Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
any new york plans 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032925 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032926 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013365.txt,"12. In light of information I received suggesting that British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell,
former girlfriend and long-time friend of Epstein’s, was involved in managing Epstein’s
affairs and companies I had her served for deposition for August 17, 2009. (Deposition
Notice attached to Statement of Undisputed Facts as Exhibit BB). Maxwell was
represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and I
understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was
reluctant to give her deposition, and I tried to work with her attorney to take her
deposition on terms that would be acceptable to both sides. Her attormey and I
negotiated a confidentiality agreement, under which Maxwell agreed to drop any
objections to the deposition. Maxwell, however, still avoided the deposition. On June
29, 2010, one day before I was to fly to NY to take Maxwell’s deposition, her attorney
informed me that Maxwell’s mother was deathly ill and Maxwell was consequently
flying to England with no intention of returning and certainly would not return to the
United States before the conclusion of Jane Doe’s trial period (August 6, 2010).
Despite that assertion, I later learned that Ghislaine Maxwell was in fact in the country
on approximately July 31, 2010, as she attended the wedding of Chelsea Clinton
(former President Clinton’s daughter) and was captured in a photograph taken for US
Weekly magazine.

13. Epstein alleges that there was something improper in the fact that I notified him that I
intended to take Donald Trump’s deposition in the civil suits against him. Trump was
properly noticed because: (a) after review of the message pads confiscated from
Epstein’s home, the legal and investigative team assisting my clients learned that Trump
called Epstein’s West Palm Beach mansion on several occasions during the time period
most relevant to my clients’ complaints; (b) Trump was quoted in a Vanity Fair article
about Epstein as saying ""I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy."" ""He's a lot
of fum to be with. It is evem said that he likes beautiful women as much as I de, and
many of them are om the younger side. Ne doubt about it —- Jeffrey enjoys his social
life.""' Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery; He's pals with a passel of
Nobel Prize-winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, socialite
Ghislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't until he flew Bill Clinton,
Kevin Spacey, and Chris Tucker to Africa om his private Boeimg 727 that the world
began to wonder whe he is. By Landom Thomas Jr.; (c) I learned through a source
that Trump banned Epstein from his Maralago Club in West Palm Beach because
Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club; (d) Jame Doe No. 102’s
complaint alleged that Jane Doe 102 was initially approached at Trump’s Maralago by
Ghislaine Maxwell and recruited to be Maxwell and Epstein’s underage sex slave; (e)
Mark Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein’s brother) testified that Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s
plane with him (the same plane that Jane Doe 102 alleged was used to have sex with
underage girls) deposition of Mark Epstein, September 21, 2009 at 48-50; (f) Trump
visited Epstein at his home in Palm Beach — the same home where Epstein abused
minor girls daily; (g) Epstein’s phone directory from his computer contains 14 phone
numbers for Donald Trump, including emergency numbers, car numbers, and numbers
to Trump’s security guard and houseman. Based on this information, | believed that

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013365
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019328.txt,"The production of the following episodes will wrap early 2017:

On Emily Dickinson’s “I cannot dance opon my Toes”: Cynthia Nixon, Yo Yo Ma, Marie Howe
and Bill T. Jones; On Marianne Moore’s “The Fish”: Jorie Graham, Edward Norton, Conservation
International scientists, and the passengers and crew of oceanographic vessel The Alucia; On
Elizabeth Bishop’s “One Art” or Edna St. Vincent Millay’s “Four Sonnets.”

Jeffrey,

Just a quick note to thank you again for all the help you've given me. The generous contribution you
made last year to Verse Video Education is now in use (we've hired our new editor!). Once he helps
us to plow through the work of this year, we'll begin to look forward to crafting educational content on
the literature of art, sport and play (these materials now including footage from recent shoots with
Shaquille O'Neal, Yo Yo Ma, Cynthia Nixon, Bono and others). 100K makes so much possible.

But, of course, you've also been a key preceptor as I've learned how --squirming ail the way--the
sausage really gets made in public television. | can't say I've been entirely successful in taming costs
there, but I've been far better armed and more mindful of what they should be after the stern tutorial
you administered.

Whenever Templeton might be ready to evaluate another application, I'm ready for another proposal
for them. | wonder if you might arrange a meeting for me with the famous Barnaby? | can't yet afford
a grant writer, and so the time one of these suckers takes makes me think doing more advance
reconnaissance is crucial. Would he meet with me? Kosher? I'd also love to meet with the Blacks as
| get closer to making content on theatre. | hope that Debra is well.

And heard there's another little Jeff in the caribbean...
Best,

Elisa New

Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature
Harvard University

148 Barker Center

12 Quincy Street

Cambridge, MA

02138

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019328
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022106.txt,"TERSON

ly finding underage girls to
pstein and Maxwell also got
quaintances. Epstein specifi-
r him doing this was so that
ald “be in his pocket,” and he
n.” I understood that Epstein
if he was ever caught doing
d escape trouble altogether.

ation in support of a motion to
mgoing, as of this writing) that
scution agreement that Jeffrey
vernment. Roberts was seeking
e government by two other vic-
ion in April of 2015, explaining
yending for several years, and it
ional plaintiff.

yes on for another eight pages, and
its, was stricken from the record—
urid’ and “unnecessary details”

‘suit against the government, wete a

he proceedings.

Ghislaine Maxwell called the ©
lies,” after which Roberts filed a 4
ll. In an answer filed in the suit, ©
s’s “story of abuse at the hands of

for financial gain.

138

yy

CHAPTER 35

Alicia: May 20, 1997

onald Trump's instincts regarding Jeffrey Epstein were
“— But if the reporters who were beginning to look
into Epstein’s mysterious background had dug a bit fur-
per, there’s a chance they would have hit pay dirt as well—and
not just in Palm Beach.
] In California, for instance, a paper trail already stretched
_ from the Santa Monica Police Department to Epstein’s front fie
In the spring—almost the summer—of 1997, a call came in t
""the police. The young woman who placed it—a young actress wh .
4 reared on Baywatch and General Hospital—said she'd been se ;
q ally assaulted at a trendy hotel called Shutters on the Beach _
Be — who Tonk the call knew the woman’s name—
4 nd her voice. A week earlier, she’d told him about an

* Alicia’ it ah
y aS name, some identifying details, and dialogue have been changed

139

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022106
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011912.txt,"Filing # 22956396 E-Filed 01/26/2015 12:26:55 PM

IN THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA
IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL DIVISION
JEAN-LUC BRUNEL, individually,
and MC2 MODEL &
TALENT MIAMI, LLC
Civil Action No.: 14-21348 CA 01
Plaintiffs,
VS.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
TYLER MCDONALD, TYLER
MCDONALD D/B/A/ YILORG

Defendants.
/

AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR LEGAL & EQUITABLE RELIEF AND
DAMAGES

COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Jean-Luc Brunel and MC2 Model & Talent Miami, LLC, by
and through undersigned counsel, and sues Defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Tyler McDonald, and
Tyler McDonald d/b/a/ Yi.Org for legal relief, equitable relief and defamation, and states as
follows:

1. Venue is proper in Dade County, Florida as Defendants Tyler McDonald and Tyler
McDonald d/b/a Yi.Org do business in Dade County, Plaintiff Jean-Luc Brunel resides in Dade
County, Florida, and Piaintiff MC2 Model & Talent Miami, LLC, has an office in Dade County.
The causes of action and damages against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein accrued in Dade County,
Florida, due to specific acts by Epstein there, and accordingly, venue is appropriate there.
Florida Statute 47.011.

Ds Florida Statute 48.193(1)(a)(1) (‘long-arm”’) authorizes service on both out-of-state

Defendants (Tyler McDonald, and Tyler McDonald d/b/a/ Yi.Org).

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011912
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029683.txt,"Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

De ee eee ee ee ee ee ee i ee a

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

De ee eee ee ee ee i ee

The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029683
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018988.txt,"Date: 7/13/06 PALM BEACH POLICH DEPARTMENT 3
Time: 9:27:55 Incident Report © Program: CMS301L
Case No. .. . : 1-05-000368 (Continued)
for[____] The interview was concluded and the micro cassettes were
turn in as evidence. bé

On October 5, 2005, I researched the incoming telephone number that

had i] | message. The telephone number, [—__s—s——=iéd‘
was assigned to ATT/Cingular Cellular service. I prepared a subpoena
request and faxed the request to the State Attorney s Office.
Information requested was subscriber information as well as all
incoming and outgoing calls for the months of September and October

2005.
I later researched[__——_. ]and discovered she resides in Royal

Palm Beach. Det. Dawson and I drove to Royal Palm Beach and met with
Co fat her residence[ Jin Royal Palm Beach.

[agreed to speak with us in the kitchen area. During a sworn
taped statement, [___] stated the following: On or about November
2004, she was approached by and asked if she wanted to
make money. She agreed and was told she would provide a massage to
wealthy man in Palm Beach. MBB picked her up and drove her to a
house in Palm Beach. She was brought into the kitchen area of the
house. She further stated that
went with them. They were brought into the kitchen where she was
introduced to Jeff and other females. [| __|stated she was
introduced to a helper of Jeff; the female was described as white
female (unknown name), with blond hair. She stated that the assistant
was familiar with BI. The assistant set up the massage table and
put out lotions to be used. She told[__]Jeff would available ina
minute. Jeff entered the room wearing only a towel. Jeff lay on the
massage table and picked a lotion to rub on his thighs and back.
[| further stated that during the massage Jeff asked her to remove
her clothes. She complied and removed her pants and blouse.
didn't remémber if she had removed her bra but feels that she did.

was certain that she stayed in her thong underwear.
continued the massage and at one point she straddled him to massage
his back, which touched his buttocks with hers. [___] was instructed
to return to the ground at which time Jeff turned to have his chest
rubbed. advised it was at this time she is sure he was
masturbating. did not want to look at his penis area because
she was uncomfortable. Jeff removed a large white vibrator and turned
it on. [.__J|stated he began rubbing the vibrator over her thong
underwear on her vaginal area. Shortly thereafter, Jeff ejaculated
and removed himself from the table. He walked over to where the
shower was and opened the glass door. She _waited as he was taking a
shower in her direct view. When I asked [___]how old she was when
this occurred, she stated she had just turned seventeen. At the
conclusion of the shower,[____Jwas paid either $350.00 or $400.00.
She stated she wasn't sure, but knows it was close to $400.00. At the
conclusion of the interview, [___] stated she never returned to
provide a massage for Jeff. She advised she was ashamed and
uncomfortable with the situation. .

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018988
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013403.txt,"Page 1

@ LexisNexis’

1 of 11 DOCUMENTS

Copyright 2009 Associated Newspapers Ltd.
All Rights Reserved
The Evening Standard (London)

December 24, 2009 Thursday
LENGTH: 824 words
HEADLINE: CITY SPY

BODY:

EXPECT more media firms to announce plans to charge for content online in early 2010. City Spy hears that busi-
ness-to-business publisher United Business Media is the latest outfit which is thinking of ramping up its subscription
model. Property Week and Building are among the titles which recently started asking users to register their details to
keep reading stories, which is seen as a possible precursor to charging.

BUSINESSES TIPPED TO COME A CROPPER

AMID all the contradictory forecasts for recovery or double-dip recession in 2010, what do the insolvency practi-
tioners say? City Spy's mole in the bean-counting world says the last quarter of 2009 was surprisingly quiet as the
economy stabilised but they are not optimistic about the new year: ""We reckon there's going to be a rush of insolvencies
in the second quarter, after the end of the financial year."" The next quarterly rent review is due tomorrow, Christmas
Day, then again at the end of March. But given the number of ""seasonal sales"" that started on the High Street at least a
week before Christmas, it would be no surprise to see some retailers come a cropper sooner...

EPSTEIN PILOT TAKES TO THE ROAD

FURTHER news reaches City Spy of former Bear Stearns trader, Prince Andrew's shooting companion and con-
victed sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein.

The ex-Wall Street star served 13 months in jail on criminal charges of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor
for prostitution and he now faces civil claims from young women accusing him of having unlawful sex with them. This
week, City Spy recounted how Epstein had transferred the title deeds of his prized 2003 Ferrari 575M Maranello to his
private pilot Larry Visoki, prior to the car going on sale for $159,000 (£99,000) (possibly to help Epstein pay his legal
bills). It turns out, the same Visoki was deposed last week by Bradley Edwards, an attorney for three of the women su-
ing Epstein. Questioned by Edwards about plane passengers who might have witnessed Epstein in the company of
young girls, Visoki admitted Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, former Colombian
president Andrés Pastrana Arango, Obama economic adviser Lawrence Summers, billionaire Ron Burkle, and actors
Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker had been on board the plane while young girls were present. Fortuitously for Epstein,
however, Ferrari-selling Visoki swore on oath that he never suspected his boss of having sex with them.

Of course not, Larry. Now drive off into the sunset.

More on Prince Andrew, our special representative for international trade and investment. The European Parliament
and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe have strongly condemned Azerbaijan for tightening re-
strictions on the media and jailing two bloggers who were critical of the government. It transpires the oil-rich country
has long blocked BBC broadcasts there, which might explain why oft-criticised Andrew and former Prime Minister
Tony Blair spend so much time visiting the sometime Soviet State.

What does the snow have in common with the recession? Every other country can get out of both but Britain can't
get out of either. HAPPY news: private jet travel is back, reports the Wall Street Journal. Alas, there is a ""but"" [#x2039]

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013403
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016132.txt,"Table 8: Fiscal consolidation measures through 2020 leave undisclosed financing gap

Fiscal measure Annual revenue raised (US$bn) Annual revenue raised (% of GDP) Impact on inflation (ppt) Remark
Non-oil revenue measures 100 15.8 - NTP target
Fees on excess foreign worker quotas 10 1.6 - NTP target
Green-card like program 10 1.6 - NTP target
VAT 10 1.6 5 NTP target
Subsidy reform 30 47 NTP target
Natural gas feedstock for petrochemicals 2.5 0.4 - BofA ML assumption
Domestic crude 20.8 3.3 - BofA ML assumption
Gasoline 1.4 0.2 0.5 BofA ML assumption
Diesel 1.9 0.3 - BofA ML assumption
Other measures 40 6.3 - NTP target
Land tax 11 1.7 - BofA ML assumption
Remittance tax 2.3 0.4 - BofA ML assumption
Income tax on expatriates 3.9-7.8 0.6-1.2 - BofA ML assumption
Sin tax on tobacco 0.7 0.1 0.1 BofA ML assumption
Sin tax on sugary drinks 1.4 0.2 0.4 BofA ML assumption
Memo:
Undisclosed revenue financing gap 16.8-20.7 2.7-3.3 - BofA ML assumption
Cost savings Annual savings (US$bn) Annual savings (% of GDP)
20% cut to on-budget non-oil subsidies 0.2-0.8 0.1-0.5 - BofA ML assumption
5% cut to the wage bill 6.4 1.0 z NTP target
Cost increases Annual cost increase (US$bn) Annual cost increase (% of GDP)
NTP costs (US$71.5bn) 14.3 2.2 NTP target

Source: National Transformation Plan, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research

Chart 18: Breakdown of electricity consumption by sector Chart 19: Water consumption by sector

Municipal,
9%
Industh¥Qs %

Agriculture,
88%
m Residential = Commercial m Industry
= Government m Other Agriculture
Source: SAMA, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 2015. Source: UN, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 2010.

Budgeted defence spending — up or down

Localization policies in the defence industry could help cut imports (total defence
imports of USS$9.8bn equivalent to US$1.5bn or 6% of total imports in 2015, according
to consultancy IHS) and conserve Fx reserves, but we expect this to be a slow and
gradual process. We think that large defense imports are typically amortized over a
number of years. Defence spending is an important part of fiscal spending in Saudi
Arabia, accounting for c30% of total budgeted spending. Defence spending in 2016 was
budgeted at SAR213bn (US$56.9bn; 9.0% of GDP), down from SAR307bn (US$81.8bn;
12.7% of GDP) in 2015. Increased military and security projects in 2015 saw an
additional overspend of SAR2Obn last year. It is unclear to us if all of the regional
military costs have been recognised on-balance sheet. A negotiated settlement to the
Yemen conflict through the ongoing political negotiations in Kuwait could help contain
security spending near-term.

22 GEMs Paper #26 | 30 June 2016 3S Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016132
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018750.txt,"Sirong Las

$6 billion of under construction and planned Strip development is the greatest since 1950’s
$45.1 billion in annual visitor revenue during 2014, a new record

41.1 million visitors in 2014; 2015 is on track to hit 42 million, a new record

4 million square feet of new convention space under development, a new record

$9.6 billion in gaming revenues in 2014 near peak 2007 levels

Visitor volume projected to increase by 500,000 every year for the foreseeable future
Average hotel occupancy is 92% on the Strip

Tier One hotel ADR was $232 in 2014

Nearly 650,000 new residents since 2000, representing 47% growth during the past decade

1.3 million more room nights were sold in 2014 over 2013

LAS VEGAS VISITOR ECONOMIC IMPACT 2000 - 2014 LAS VEGAS CONVENTION STATISTICS

| Las Vegas Visitor Economic Impact = Attendance =@= Conventions
$44.9 $45.0 $45.1

41.6 $41.6
$39.4 $40.2
$36.7 $36.8
33.7 $35.2
32.8
31.5 31.9 31.6
$28.7 |
24.6

63 69

© 5.2
5.0 5.1
4.9
45 4.5

7 3 Q
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$45.1 Billion 4,000,000 Square Feet
Visitor Revenues hit New Record Convention Space under Construction to Accommodate Demand

($ Billions)
3 &

Attendance (millions)
# of Conventions

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018750
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033384.txt,"From: 
Sent: 3/25/2011 3:00:02 PM 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
Paul Rampell does act as Donald Trump's attorney for some personal, real estate and Town of PB matters. James Green 
of WPB also does work for Trump (like the American flag matter) usually through Rampell. I think another firm was doing 
the airport flight path and expansion matter. 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
To: Jack Goldberger 
Cc: paul prosperi 
Sent: Fri, Mar 25, 2011 9:36 am 
Subject: Re: 
was it Rampell. 
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Jack Goldberger > wrote: 
Looking for his name. haven't located yet 
From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacationagmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 8:37 AM 
To: Jack Goldberger 
Subject: 
donald attnny? 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacationagmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033384 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacationagmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033385 
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018319.txt,"ability to plug into and share with one another is the essence of their power.!!6 Your
data-enabled phone or camera or database or stock-trading program is easy and
powerful to use because so much of the world’s data - your Sigur Ros songs, your
home movies, your skin temprature — can be reduced to ones and zeros, freed for
fast transmission, endless storage and quick analysis.!1” A machine that can blithely
handle digital inputs of one sort, whether it is trading orders or music files, has the
capacity, in theory, to work with any data. Such adjustability is what forces app
companies, gaming businesses, or phone companies onto an exhausting treadmill of
constant upgrade. Interaction between the pieces of a system, every bit as much as
design or mechanical manipulation, is the reason why change happens.!!8
Entrepreneurs mix GPS and phones to create a new business of tracking everything
from our cars to our children. Algorithmic trading programs engineer completely
virtual portfolios - you can buy the S&P Index but as your manager to strip out any
performance from tobacco and gun companies, for instance. Or: Terrorists meet
online and swap data. Some of the most astonishing systems of our new world have
grown up this way. Google’s back-end search systems, for instance, were not “top-
down” designed so much as they emerged, competed and evolved to deliver once-
unimaginable loads of data. No one at Google is “The Architect.” There is no central
approval for technology systems. Complexity and unpredictability and emergence
are regarded as the best way to grow. 119

Long before the idea of a smart phone or 3D goggles, the British mathematician
Alan Turing anticipated their arrival when he dreamed of what he called a
“universal device”!2°: A notional box that, starting from the ones and zeros of
digitized data, could be constructed to do anything. Since everything can ultimately
be reduced to a binary encoding, nearly any sort of data can be shared, studied,
combined or remixed. This easy programmability of so many objects around us now
is why our world now is more complex than, say, a world of interconnected rail cars
or ships might have been. Rail cars and ships don’t change much, and certainly not
instantly. In the digital world, however, many of the most essential objects and
nodes can be flipped around like digital Lego, connected in different ways. And
because they are increasingly “always on”, they are also always changing and
adjusting to what happens elsewhere on the network. This is true for some new
operating system dumped onto your phone that makes it more intelligent as it is for
an algorithm placed into a commodity market that causes unexpected chaos.

116 In fact; Paul Phister, “Cyberspace: The Ultimate Complex Adaptive System”, The
International C2 Journal, Vol 4, No. 2 2010-2011

117 Your data-enabled phone: Gershenson, p4

118 Interaction between: Paul Dourish, Where the Action Is: The Foundations of
Embodied Interaction, (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001) 4

119 Complexity and unpredictability: Randy Shoup speech “Service architectures
at scale: Lessons from Google and Ebay”, on infoq.com, July 14, 2015

120 Long before: S. B. Cooper and J. Van Leeuwen, Alan Turing: His Work and Impact.
(Waltham, MA: Elsevier, 2013)

87

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018319
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025265.txt,"Japanese equities

Preference: neutral

Topix (24 Oct): 743 (last publication: 743)

UBS view Topix (6-month target): 756

e We expect earnings growth of about 25% over the upcoming 12 months. A relatively high growth rate
still reflects last year's sharp decline caused by two natural disasters. Still, the earnings recovery has
disappointed so far. Earnings growth continues to slow down and is expected to move toward a more
normal single-digit growth in 2013.

¢ The government started implementing its JPY 18 trillion recovery budget in Q4 2011; we expect it to
boost GDP by 0.5-1.0% in FY2012, and about 0.5% in 2013.

e However, we see only limited scope for an additional earnings boost from the local economic recovery.
Slowing export markets also curtail the outlook. June quarter-earnings results revealed emerging market
demand was below expectation, capping earnings growth.

e We expect the TOPIX trailing P/E to drop to around 13.5x from 15.0x over the coming months, mainly due
to the earnings recovery; this provides room for moderate price increases only.

A Positive scenario Topix (6-month target): 970

¢ Stronger global demand and stabilizing European markets lead to improved risk-taking. Falling risk
aversion is likely to lead to a weaker yen, providing an additional increase in earnings. We expect 10-15%
EPS growth in FY2013 and the TOPIX target is based on 16.0x trailing P/E.

& Negative scenario Topix (6-month target): 575

¢ Faltering global growth leads to weak exports, triggering negative earnings surprises. USD-JPY rate
strengthening to below 75 and potential economic conflicts with China might serve as an additional drag

on earnings. We would then expect the P/E ratio to contract to 13.0x and earnings to fall during the
upcoming six months.

Note: Scenarios refer to global economic scenarios (see slide 7)

What we're watching Why it matters

JPY and exports The exchange rate is an important factor for the Japanese equity market. Japan’s

trade balance could be in deficit and may impact USD-JPY rates. Key date: Nov
21, Japanese trade balance

BoJ’s monetary policy

If the Bank of Japan makes additional commitments to its asset-purchase
board meeting

program, which is currently JPY 70 trillion in size, it would lead to a weaker yen,
in our view. Key date: Oct 30, BoJ policy meeting

2 UBS

For further information please contact ClO asset class specialist Toru Ibayashi, toru.ibayashi@ubs.com

Recommendations

Tactical (6 months)

e Japanese value stocks have under-
performed growth stocks by more than
20% for the last four months. We see this
as an overreaction to concerns on the
slower global economy, and recommend
picking some value stocks with high
dividend yields.

We prefer companies that are using cost-
reduction initiatives to maintain price
competitiveness during periods of yen
strength.

Strategic (1 to 2 years)

e A weaker USD-JPY rate may drive
Japanese companies’ earnings recovery
beyond a technical recovery from natural
disasters. Japanese exporters and
companies owning international
operations would benefit from such a
development.

Japanese realized earnings likely to
recover further going forward

(5)
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

— Top 12m realized earnings per share

Source: Thomson Reuters, UBS, as of October 22, 2012
Note: Past performance is not an indication of future returns.

18

Please see important disclaimer and disclosures at the end of the document.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025265
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023137.txt,"OUP CORRECTED PROOE - FINAL, 12/9/2014, SPi

Foreword and Acknowledgements

The idea of compiling an Oxford companion to the Arab-Israeli conflict was first
presented to me in 2005 by Markus Bouillon, who served for me both in my UN
capacity in Jerusalem and at the International Peace Institute (IPI) in New York. Nur
Laiq laboriously and faithfully collected most of the relevant documents and contrib-
uted to the organization of the book and the drafting of the introduction and com-
ments. Fabrice Aidan, a French diplomat, who served for ten years as my special
assistant and political adviser in my different United Nations capacities played an
instrumental role for the production of this volume. He made essential substantive
inputs to the organization and compilation of the documents and the composition of
the comments, throughout the book, as well as to the introduction. David Makovsky
and Marwan Muasher deserve thanks for reviewing the book and for providing
insightful comments.

I would like also to thank my staff at the International Peace Institute (IPI), Walter
Kemp and Adam Lupel, for their editing contribution. Miklos Pinther, former chief
UN cartographer, who in 2000 oversaw the delineation of the Blue Line between Israel,
Lebanon and Syria, compiled and produced the maps in this volume. Finally, my
executive assistant, Jilla Moazami, gave invaluable administrative support. Without
these colleagues, the book would have never come to print. I am delighted that the
volume came to its conclusion on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the signing of
the Oslo Accords of 1993.

I am grateful to the Government of Norway for generous support to the Inter-
national Peace Institute’s (IPI) Middle East program over many years.

I dedicate the book to my beloved wife, Ambassador Mona Juul, my companion in
war and peace, without whom I would never have become involved in the imbroglio of
the Middle East.

Terje Rod-Larsen
Paris
16 September 2013

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023137
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021369.txt,"for loneliness or perceived social
isolation. Because they believe
themselves to be creatures of God,
Christians feel related to God whatever
happens. Whatever their social
circumstances--no matter, at the
extreme, how isolated or strong their
feelings of abandonment by human
others--individuals are to remember that
they remain in a relationship with God,
who is concerned about them. Even
when they feel themselves utterly
forsaken by others, Christians have
reason to believe God cannot be
forsaking them. They can believe they
are never alone even when they appear
to be absolutely so. In such
circumstances, Christians can always
avail themselves of a completely
counterfactual sense of social connection
with the best-connected “superfriend” of
all—the God who remains, they believe,
in a relationship of ultimately beneficial
causal efficacy with not just themselves
but everyone and everything.

It is the very unapparent,
counterfactual character of God’s
influence on human lives—the
invisibility of God’s influence, in short--
that permits Christians to perceive their
relationship with God as an unbreakable
constant. Because God’s influence is
unapparent or invisible Christians can
continue to believe God is operative for
creation’s benefit in the absence of any
of the obvious confirming evidence
required in ordinary cases of beneficent
human influence. Christians who believe
that God is a universal influence for
good as the world’s creator do not
expect God to be present in the way one
expects a human person to be; and
therefore God’s apparent absence, in
human terms, need not break down their
sense of being in relation to God.

123

Page

Having God as one’s creator (in
the best case scenario) is like having a
perfectly loving human benefactor; but it
is the unusual invisibility of this
benefactor that allows Christians to think
God present even when not apparently
so. Being in a relationship with God for
Christians who believe God is a good
creator is something like being in a
relationship with a human person who
never lets one out of her sight and who
intends one’s good comprehensively. It
is, for example, very like being ina
relationship with a loving parent who is
fully responsible, not just for the fact of
one’s existence, but in a comprehensive
way for one’s nurturance throughout an
extended minority. Unlike a relationship
with an ordinary human person of that
sort, however, God is believed to be
invisible and this is what allows
individuals to assume God’s constant
presence, all appearances to the contrary.

The invisibility that underlies the
Christian affirmation of God’s constancy
here is a function of the very diffuseness
of God’s influence, a diffuseness of
influence no human person, invisible or
otherwise, could possibly match. Belief
in God as the creator of the world does
not encourage one to single out God as
the cause of any specific happening in a
way that suggests God is one cause
among many, the cause of this particular
happening rather than some other with a
different cause. Belief in God as the
creator of the world does not allow one
to identify God’s influence in overly
close fashion with any particular causal
influence of a beneficent sort. Instead, as
I have suggested, whatever is of benefit
to the individual, over the long or short
term, taken as a whole, is to be attributed
to God’s influence.

The Christian cannot, then, locate
or pick out God as one could a loving

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021369
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028308.txt,"THE HOUSE OF THE NOBLEMAN
CURATED BY WOLFE VON LENKIEWICZ & VICTORIA GOLEMBIOVSKAYA

PRESS CLIPPING (INTERNET)

FURO?day

http://www.euro2day.gr/ftcom en/126/articles/607101/ArticleFTen.aspx

The Art Market: a house party

Published: 21:54 - 06/10/10

The tabular content relating to this article is not available to view. Apologies in advance for the inconvenience
caused.

""Frieze week"" kicks off this week in London, drawing the cream of the art world to Britain's capital. It is centred of
course on the fair that started it all (Frieze opens to the public in Regent's Park on Thursday), but a host of
satellite events are also on offer. One of the more intriguing is taking place just down the road from the fair, at 2
Cornwall Terrace, part of an enormously expensive real estate project being developed and sold.

In what appears to be a sophisticated way of selling both art and the property, the 18th-century mansion is being
used as a temporary venue for an exhibition entitled The House of the Nobleman, October 15-20. The format is
hybrid, both commercial and non-commercial, with 68 works on show, half of them loans from collectors - one is
David Roberts, the rest are secret - the other half consisting of works of art for sale.

The House of the Nobleman is curated by the artist Wolfe von Lenkiewicz, who has teamed up with a young
Russian curator, Victoria Golembiovskaya. It is backed by Mirax, a Russian real estate company that has a
""significant but minority"" stake in the Cromwell Terrace complex. Mirax belongs to a Russian billionaire, Sergei
Polonsky, but Mirax has been troubled since the financial recession and has a reported $120m in debt; the firm
did not respond to a request for comment. The eight houses in the Cromwell Terrace complex are priced between
£29m and £60m.

Various dealers, from the UK and elsewhere, are contributing works of art to the show; they range from two
paintings by Poussin to Picasso's ""Buste d'Homme a la Pipe"" (1969), priced at £3m. Banksy, Richter, Klein, Rodin,
Cézanne and Warhol are the unlikely bedfellows in the show, which includes two works by Von Lenkiewicz himself
(at £60,000 and £50,000). While entry is free, visitors must register for admission (www.cornwallterrace.co.uk);
they will be taken around in groups of 50, according to the curators.

28

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028308
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014725.txt,"and 119 House Republicans represent these states. Repealing Obamacare without
replacing it would entail either a significant cut in the funding of the program or
that the state tax payers will have to pick up the bills. Either is likely to hurt
Republican support in these states.

Tax reform: BAT won’t kill it

The proposed border adjustment tax in the Ryan-Brady plan has been attracting a lot of
attention lately. Although we have concerns about some specific aspects of the proposal
(which we will discuss later), the popular view that it could be a deal breaker for the
whole tax reform initiative seems to us difficult to substantiate.

Below are some key facts that are worth noting:

« — It has been thirty years since the US last overhauled its tax code. Most mainstream
economists agree that it needs a serious update.

* Tax reform requires strong political consensus. The Republicans, by gaining control
of the Presidency and retaining their control of both houses of Congress in the
November elections, are in a strong position to push through major tax reform.

* The tax reform proposal from House Republicans has already gone through
extensive consultations and enjoys broad support within the House Republican
Conference.

e One of the key commitments of the Trump campaign is tax cuts and simplification
to boost growth.

« The US today has the highest marginal corporate income tax rate among OECD
countries.

« Another major difference between the US and other major economies is that US
corporations are taxed on their world-wide income as opposed to territorial income.
In 2000, 17 out of the current 34 OECD members had a world-wide system. By
2010, only 7 did.

e | The combination of high corporate income tax rate and a world-wide income tax
system has two unintended consequences. One, US companies currently hold more
than $2trn in capital overseas. Two, an increasing number of US companies are
acquiring smaller foreign companies with the purpose of relocating their
headquarters outside the US (ie, inversion). Between 2003 and 2011, there were
only 7 such transactions. From 2012 and 2015, 27 such transactions were
completed.

« The valued added tax (VAT) system has been gaining popularity over the past
twenty years. Today, more than 160 countries have a VAT. The U.S. is the only
OECD country that doesn’t.

« — The fact that the US does not have a VAT system puts US produced goods at a
disadvantage. VAT is “border adjusted” - meaning that when a good is exported the
producer gets a rebate while imports are subject to VAT.

These facts together make it very apparent that both the case for tax reform and
support for tax reform are very strong. Paul Ryan said on January 26 after the
Republican retreat in Philadelphia that they “aspire” to pass tax reforms by August.

Bankof America <>
Merrill Lynch Cause and Effect | 13 February 2017 5

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014725
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025271.txt,"US rates

Duration preference: neutral

US 10-year (24 Oct): 1.8% (last month: 1.8%)
UBS view US 10-year (6-month forecast): 2.0%
e US 10-year yields traded largely sideways within a narrow range. Improving domestic economic and sentiment data
was balanced by concerns of the elections/fiscal cliff weighing on the US economy. However, both the ECB and the
Fed have provided substantial and credible backstops that significantly reduce tail risks. This reduces the flight to
quality and the risk discount placed on Treasuries in the event of a re-escalation of the European debt crisis. This
represents a clear floor with little chance of retesting the historical lows of July (~1.4%). In addition, the Fed's
willingness to fall behind the curve in support of the domestic labor market will increase inflation expectations over
the medium term. This implies steeper yield curves.
¢ In addition, the credible and conditional central bank backstops have already improved sentiment and should help
to kick-start growth if politicians provide the necessary tailwinds. Yields will then return to their slightly higher,
previously stable ranges over a six-month horizon (1.8%-2.1%).
e At the same time, US yields should be capped, as the US economy continues to be vulnerable to spillover effects
from the Eurozone. Structurally weak growth which will be dampened by the upcoming US fiscal consolidation, will
add to volatility and limit the increase in yields.

A Positive scenario for US bonds US 10-year (6-month range): 1.4-1.6%
¢ US fiscal deleveraging beyond our expectations weighs on the cyclical recovery and is a drag on yields.

° A re-escalation of the European debt crisis burdens yields. Implementation risks in the ECB framework remain, given
that Italy and Spain have not yet made the necessary application, which will result in the peripheral spread widening.
At the same time, Greece is likely to announce a second debt restructuring and leave the Eurozone next year.

¢ The labor market fails to recover, increasing the likelihood of even more MBS purchases or alternative measures, and
yields stay low or fall further.

& Negative scenario for US bonds US 10-year (6-month range): 2.1-2.5%
¢ If the ECB buying of short-dated Spanish and Italian sovereign bonds increases risk appetite, it would reduce the
flight to quality more substantially and this represents an upside risk to our forecasts.

Recommendations

Tactical (6 months)

e Weak global growth momentum, ongoing
bond market support from central banks
and the lingering euro crisis are likely to
keep yields at extraordinarily low levels for
some time. Tactically, we suggest a neutral
duration position.

Strategic (1 to 2 years)

e Yields have significant upside potential
over the next couple of years given the
extraordinarily low current levels of real
interest rates in particular. Thus clients
with a longer time horizon should focus
on bonds with short and medium
maturities.

USD 10-year yields and forecasts

5%

4%

e If EU leaders make progress toward increased fiscal integration, and US growth recovers with a rapidly improving paul
labor market, then yields could rise more significantly. i \, yA,
Note: Scenarios refer to global economic scenarios (see slide 7) 3% My Why
Wy \
1 7 . \ rt
What we're watching Why it matters is, Mol,
Fed policy The Fed's assessment of the labor market determines its stance on quantitative easing me
and is key for yields. Key dates: Nov 2, NFP; Dec 11 Fed FOMC meeting 1%
Inflation expectations Current yields do not reflect low real-interest rates, but rather normal inflation
expectations. Inflation expectations increased on the back of the latest Fed action, ed
A ‘ ‘ . 6 Oct-09 Oct-10 Oct-11 Oct-12 Oct-13
leading to more upside risk for long maturity yields.
US presidential The US presidential election will guide fiscal spending for the coming years. ""forecasts US 10¥
elecienihises| cliff & debt Source: Bloomberg, UBS, as of October 15, 2012
coud Note: Past performance is not an indication of future returns.
ba UBS For further information please contact ClO's asset class specialist Daniela Steinbrink Mattei, daniela.steinbrinkmattei@ubs.com 24

Please see important disclaimer and disclosures at the end of the document.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025271
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023123.txt,"The New Origins Project Presents:
Strange Bedfellows:
Culture, Meet Science/Science, Meet Culture

This series will bring together cultural icons, celebrities, movie stars, directors, writers and
musicians with famous scientists to talk about commonalities and differences. Each
segment will be moderated by scientist/author/provocateur Lawrence Krauss, who has
spent much of his career successfully crossing the chasm separating science and culture.
When at Arizona State University, the Origins Project he created and led for a decade there
produced singular events in which over 3000 people would regularly attend live, and up to
500,000 people would watch the recorded events to hear dialogues and panels, to be
entertained and informed.

First Season (Proposed—23 participants have already agreed in principle)

i.

De
a

a

a he

Johnny Depp, Courtney Love, Marilyn Manson talk creativity in music versus
creativity in Science with Nobel Laureates Frank Wilczek and Yuval Hoffman.
Woody Allen talks about the human condition with Linguist Noam Chomsky.

Ricky Gervais and Astronomer Royale, former President of the Royal Society, Martin
Rees.

Sarah Silverman and Nobel Prizewinning economist Paul Krugman.

William Shatner and Nobel Prize winning physicists Kip Thorne/ Steve Weinberg or
Elon Musk.

Director Werner Herzog, Cormac McCarthy, with biologist Svante Paabo.

Jan McEwan and Nobel Laureate Biologist Elizabeth Blackburn.

Barack Obama and psychologist Steven Pinker.

Director Alex Garland and IT computer scientist Eric Horvitz/Larry Page

0. Actor Bill Pullman, Magician Penn Jillette and Nobel Prizewinning

economist/psychologist Danny Kahneman.

11. Actor/writer Stephen Fry and Psychologist Robert Sapolsky
12. Actress Andie Macdowell and Evolutionary Biologist Richard Dawkins

The series will bring together Krauss and the directorial team that produced the Feature
Documentary The Unbelievers. Each episode will be shot in a beautiful location in a
different city around the world. We will go where the participants live, or work.

Format will be moderated discussion. Krauss will introduce each participant and begin the
episode by asking some questions to provoke discussion. The participants will be
encouraged whenever possible to dialogue with each other as well. The dialogues will take
place among live audiences in beautiful theaters around the US and UK. We will take one or
two questions from the audience to end the program before the program ends.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023123
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014731.txt,"Unauthorized redistribution of this report is prohibited. This report is intended for kaasha.saini@baml.com

Global Rates, FX & EM 2017 Year Ahead
Tectonic shifts

Our top 10 Rates, FX & EM trades for 2017

Short US Sy rates — Two and a half Fed hikes priced by the rates market for 2017-
18 are not consistent with aggressive fiscal easing promised by Trump.

Bankof America
Merrill Lynch

16 November 2016 Corrected

FX and Rates
Global

2. Short US 10y real rates — After the violent repricing of inflation breakevens, we
believe real rates offer better risk-reward to position for higher rates.
3. Buy USD/JPY — With the BO) pegging 10y JGB yields at zero, we expect this highly Se David Woo
interest rate sensitive USD cross will continue to be the biggest beneficiary of the eee ot ence oe
Trump win.
4. Sell a basket of Brazilian, Mexican, and Colombian long bonds — Positioning in J
- r r , Beth PBs David Woo
EM fixed income market remains crowded while liquidity is poor. FX, Rates & EM Strategist
MLPF&S

david.woo@baml.com

5. Sell BRL/MXN — MXN is oversold but BRL will likely be vulnerable to the divergent

5 , Ko ohh ‘ See Team Page for Full List of Contributors

paths between Brazil’s easing and the Fed’s tightening cycles.

6. Buy USD call/CNH put — President Trump will need a weak USD, but President Xi
needs a weak CNY. We believe risk premium for a collision course is too low.

7. Sell EUR/GBP - Brexit and Trump could bolster the anti-globalization parties in
Europe ahead of key elections next year.

8. Sell Eurozone 30y inflation breakevens — We think investors should take
advantage of the recent rally to sell into the December ECB meeting, which could
disappoint.

9. Sell EUR/RUB — Likely OPEC production cuts on November 30 and possible
sanction relief for Russia are bullish for the RUB, in our view.

10. Buy NZD/USD put spread — Spot NZD/USD is forming a head and shoulders top
pattern that suggests a decline will follow in 2017.

Trading ideas and investment strategies discussed herein may give rise to significant risk and are not
suitable for all investors. Investors should have experience in FX markets and the financial resources to
absorb any losses arising from applying these ideas or strategies.

BofA Merrill Lynch does and seeks to do business with issuers covered in its research reports. As a
result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the
objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making
their investment decision.

Refer to important disclosures on page 54 to 56. Analyst Certification on page 53. Valuation &
Risk on page 53. 11688515

Timestamp: 16 November 2016 05:30AM EST

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014731
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014378.txt,"Price objective basis & risk

AllianceBernstein (AB)

Our $25 price objective is based on 13x target P/E on our '17E, a discount vs our target
for asset managers as a group, based on improving but inconsistent flows and limited
active equity exposure as well as the MLP structure which means less liquidity, though a
high distribution. Upside/downside risks to our price objective are market
appreciation/depreciation, similar to other asset managers, underperformance, and an
unpredictable yield since it is based on earnings rather than fixed. Because Alliance is an
MLP, total potential return includes a variable distribution based on earnings.

Amer Express (AXP)

Our $74 price objective reflects a 13x PE multiple to our 2017 EPS estimate. Given the
elevated uncertainty, we expect AXP will trade near the low end of its historical
valuation range, which averages 12x-16x. This multiple reflects our view of solid loan
growth and better billings, offset by increased risks of rising credit and marketing costs.
We think the market will view AXP through a more credit card lens in the near-term,
which also supports a multiple at the low end of the historical range.

Upside risks to our PO are stronger than expected macroeconomic conditions,
accelerating consumer and business spending, lack of disruptions in capital markets, or a
decreasing regulatory burden. Downside potential could come from weaker than
expected macroeconomic conditions and renewed recessionary pressure, softer
consumer and business spending, disruptions in capital markets, or an increasing
regulatory burden.

Ares Management (ARES)

Our price objective (PO) for Ares is $18, which implies a target price-to-ENI (P/ENI or
P/E) multiple of 11x our 2017 ENI estimate. Our price objective is based on our sum-of-
the-parts (SOTP) analysis. Our SOTP analysis includes the following components: a
target multiple on fee related earnings (15x - in line with or a premium to asset
manager multiples given healthy growth and sticky assets), book value for the balance
sheet investments and accrued carry, and a discounted value on the performance fee
upside over a cycle (1.3x MOIC). Based on this method, we value the fee related
earnings at $13/unit, the balance sheet (principal investments and accrued carry) at
$4/unit, and the discounted value of future carry income and investment income at
$1/unit, which equates to a total value of $18.

Risks to our PO: a weak macro and capital markets backdrop, potential changes in tax
laws related to carried interest and partnerships, legal and political risk, increased
regulation, credit market disruptions, poor performance, weak fundraising, expansion
risk, key person and talent risk, competition, a unique corporate structure that limits
unitholder control, and lock ups.

Associated Banc-Corp (ASB)

We use an equal weighted three-factor valuation framework (P/E, P/TBV, DCF) to arrive
at our $20 price objective and assign a 1.4x multiple to 3Q17E TBV and a 14.9x 2017
P/E multiple, in-line with smid-cap peers due to their near median return profile. Our
DCF assumes a two-stage cost of capital of 10% and a terminal growth rate of 5%. The
upside risk to our price objective is a less onerous residential RE cycle. Downside risks
are a double dip in housing prices, deteriorating energy portfolio and falling rental
income for commercial properties.

Banc of California (BANC)

To arrive at our $15.50 price objective, we have employed a three-factor valuation
methodology that incorporates target P/E, target P/TBV and a DCF model. For our P/E
analysis, we use a 14x earnings multiple on BANC’'s 2017E core earnings below peer

BankofAmerica <2”

64 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014378
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026243.txt,"From: Weingarten, Reid _____________________________________ 
Sent: 1/12/2018 2:25:40 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: RE: Re: 
Importance: High 
Yeah sure...I am sure the republicans who sent a criminal referral for the brit spy who did the dossier will want to see 
trump lies 
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 9:23 AM 
To: Weingarten, Reid 
Subject: Re: 
Senate subpoena? 
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:22 AM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Sri Emanuel is going to go s tv series 
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:18 AM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I think he is cracking 
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:08 AM Weingarten, Reid ? 
Don't you dare say to anyone (or even think) ""finally I agree with something he said""...... 
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 7:53 PM 
To: Weingarten, Reid 
Subject: 
wrote: 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/steve-bannon-lawyers-up-russia-investigators-ready-to-pounce 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026243 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026244 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013417.txt,"Local News: West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Martin & St. Lucie Counties | The Palm Beach Post

""It's very, very rare. I've never seen or heard of the procedure that was set up here."" said McCabe, who has no
involvement in any Epstein litigation and is now a securities litigation attorney.

""He's essentially avoiding federal prosecution because he can afford to pay that many lawyers to help those victims
review their cases.... If a person has no money he couldn't be able to strike a deal like this and avoid federal
prosecution.”

The back-room deal with federal prosecutors all the more interesting in light of the legal heavyweights who have
worked for Epstein, including Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr of Clinton impeachment fame.
Lefcourt is a past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Epstein's local defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, issued a statement Friday saying he had fought the release of
the sealed agreement to protect the third parties named there. ""Mr. Epstein has fully abided by all of its terms and
conditions. He is looking forward to putting this difficult period in his life behind him. He is continuing his long
standing history of science philanthropy...”

Epstein ended up avoiding federal charges, and pleaded guilty in state court to felony solicitation of prostitution and
procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution. In July 2008, he was sentenced to 18 months in jail, and
later allowed out up to six days a week on work release.

Epstein left the jail in late July 2009 after serving not quite 13 months of the sentence, having earned gain time for
good behavior.

Palm Beach Police began investigating the ""international moneyman of mystery,” as the New York magazine
dubbed him, after they received a complaint from a relative of a 14-year-old girl who had given Epstein a naked
massage at his home on the Intracoastal Waterway.

Police sought and found in poor neighborhoods a variety of tall, thin, model-like young women, who told stories of
begin recruiting, then going to Epstein's home and massaging and stimulating him. They walked away with between
$200 and $1,000.

The investigation triggered tensions between police and prosecutors, with then-Chief Michael Reiter saying in a
May 2006 letter to then-State Attorney Barry Krischer that the chief prosecutor should disqualify himself.

""| continue to find your office's treatment of these cases highly unusual,” Reiter wrote. He then asked for and got
the federal investigation that ended in the sealed deal.

""The Jeffrey Epstein matter was an experience of what a many-million-dollar defense can accomplish,"" Reiter told
the Palm Beach Daily News upon his retirement.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/pbcwest/content/local_news/epaper/2009/09/18/0918epstein.html

4/6/11 1:38 PM

Nea

Rick Heidy Vero Debra Robin
Audrey Gabriel Jeffrey Katie Jodie

Recent Activity
[ Login | You need to be logged into Facebook to
see your friends’ activity

Cerabino: Florida House GOP's ‘uterus’
ban: A free-speech battle is born

1,518 people shared this.

Foreclosure crisis: Fed-up judges crack
‘ down disorder in the courts

207 people shared this.

| | Facebook social plugin

POSTPIX » Latest news photos

a
e.. Aa 4

Massive earthquake and

tsunami devastate Japan

MAGES OF WAR in Iraq
and Afghanistan

Jeri Mucio Sworn in as Severe weather in Central,

South Florida

Mayor

Do Your Feet Hurt?
SELBY SHOES
561-969-9369

We'LI| Put Wow! Into Your Windows
IN THE SHADE INC
772-223-1212

Eree Hearing Test!
BELTONE
561-948-3049

Gourmet Meat in Delray
MARIO'S MEATS

561-499-7019

Do Your Feet Hurt?
SELBY SHOES
561-969-9369

Historic Archive
(1897 - 1988)

Search historic editions of The Palm Beach
Post, Palm Beach Daily News, Miami News and
more. It's free!

Page 2 of 3

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013417
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018744.txt,"Exclusive Agents

Mare D. Renard 213-955-6413
Vice Chairman
marc.renard@cushwake.com

Manfred W. Schaub 213-955-5128
Senior Director
manfred.schaub@cushwake.com

John C. Cushman Ill 213-629-6575
Chairman
john.cushman@cushwake.com

John Stinson (65) 6232 0878
Executive Managing Director
(65) 6232 0878
john.stinson@ap.cushwake.com

Ml CUSHMAN &
( WAKEFIELD

Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc.
01 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4700
Los Angeles, California 90017

Lic: #955076

Geoffrey West 702-688-6936
Senior Director
gwest@comre.com

An independently owned and

COM M E RCE | alll CUSHMAN &

REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS * COMRE.COM WAKEFIELD
Commerce Real Estate Solutions
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite
100S

Las Vegas, NV 89169

Confidentiality & Conditions

This is a confidential Offering Memorandum intended
solely for your limited use and benefit in determining
whether you desire to express any further interest in
the purchase of the 38.5-acre site (“the Property”).

This Offering Memorandum was prepared by
Cushman & Wakefield and Commerce Real Estate
Solutions (“Cushman & Wakefield”) and has been
reviewed by representatives of the owners of The
Property (“the Ownership”). It contains selected
information pertaining to the Property and does not
purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the
information that prospective purchasers may desire.
It should be noted that all information provided is
for general reference purposes only in that such
information is based on assumptions relating to the
general economy, competition, and other factors
beyond the control of Ownership and, therefore, is
subject to material variation. Additional information
and an opportunity to inspect the Property will be
made available to interested and qualified prospective
purchasers. Neither Ownership nor Cushman &
Wakefield nor any of their respective officers have
made any representation or warranty, express or
implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this
Offering Memorandum, any of its contents, or any
other materials provided as a courtesy to facilitate
prospective purchaser’s own investigations of the
Property, and no legal commitments or obligations
shall arise by reason of this Offering Memorandum,
its contents or any further information provided by
Cushman & Wakefield regarding the Property.

It is essential that all parties to real estate transactions
be aware of the health, liability and economic impact
of environmental factors on real estate. Cushman &
Wakefield does not conduct investigations or analyses
of environmental matters and, accordingly, urges its
clients to retain qualified environmental professionals
to determine whether hazardous or toxic wastes
or substances (such as asbestos, PCB’s and other
contaminants or petro-chemical products stored in
underground tanks) or other undesirable materials
or conditions are present at the Property and, if so,
whether any health danger or other liability exists. Such
substances may have been used in the construction or
operation of buildings or may be present as a result of
previous activities at the Property.

Various laws and regulations have been enacted at
the federal, state and local levels dealing with the use,
storage, handling, removal, transport and disposal of

toxic or hazardous wastes and substances. Depending
upon past, current and proposed uses of the Property,
it may be prudent to retain an environmental expert to
conduct a site investigation and/or building inspection.
If such substances exist or are contemplated to be
used at the Property, special governmental approvals
or permits may be required. In addition, the cost
of removal and disposal of such materials may be
substantial. Consequently, legal counsel and technical
experts should be consulted where these substances
are or may be present.

Ownership and Cushman & Wakefield expressly
reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to reject any
or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase
the Property and/or terminate discussions with any
entity at any time with or without notice. Ownership
shall have no legal commitment or obligation to
any entity reviewing this Offering Memorandum or
making an offer to purchase the Property unless and
until a written commitment to purchase the Property
has been fully executed, delivered and approved
by Ownership and any conditions to Ownership’s
obligations thereunder have been satisfied or waived.
Except for representations and warranties expressly
set forth in such definitive, executed purchase and
sale agreement, Ownership makes and will make no
representations and warranties regarding the Property
and any prospective purchaser must rely entirely on
its own investigations and those of its agents and
consultants.

By receipt of this Offering Memorandum, you agree
that this Offering Memorandum and its contents are of
a confidential nature, that you will hold and treat it in
the strictest confidence, and that you will not disclose
this Offering Memorandum or any of its contents to
any other entity without the prior written authorization
of Ownership nor will you use this Offering
Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or
manner detrimental to the interest of Ownership or
Cushman & Wakefield.

The terms and conditions stated in this section will relate
to all of the sections of the Offering Memorandum as
if stated independently therein. If, after reviewing this
Offering Memorandum, you have no further interest
in purchasing the Property at this time, kindly return
this Offering Memorandum to Cushman & Wakefield
at your earliest possible convenience. Photocopying or
other duplication is not authorized.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012709.txt,"MASTER CONTACT LIST REGARDING Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman

Katherine Ezell

Counsel for other Epstein Victims

Kikka Claudio Assistant to Attorney Jack Hill a
Kendall Coffey Special Counsel to RRA on Epstein Case

Ken Jenne Investigators RRA |
Lisa Rivera Legal Assistant to Adam Horowitz

Litigation Team RRA attorneys and staff

Marc Nurik Attorney RRA

Margaret Berk Legal Assistant to Spencer Kuvin

Maribel Matiska RRA Paralegal

Mark Fistos Attorney RRA

Mercedes Estrada Katherine Ezell’s Assistant

MG Client (Epstein Case)

Michael Wheeler

Attorney RRA

Mike Fisten Investigators RRA
N.R. Client communication
Nora Batian RRA Staff

Pasqual “Pat” Diaz
Pat Roberts

Investigators RRA
Investigators RRA

Paul Cassel

Co-Counsel on Epstein Case

Phaedra Xanthos

Forensic Accountant

Priscila Nascimento Staff RRA
Richard Willits Attorney
Richard Wolfe Attorney RRA

Robert Buschel
Robert C. Josefsbergs

Attorney RRA
Counsel for other Epstein Victims

Robin T. Kempner
Ronald Wise

RRA Personnel
Russell Adler

RRA Staff
Forensics (Epstein Case)

Attorney RRA

| Scott Goldstein

Attorney RRA

Scott Rothstein

Attorney RRA

Seth Lehrman

Attorney RRA

Shawn Gilbert Prior Legal Assistant to Brad Edwards

Sid Garcia Counsel for other Epstein Victims
Counsel for other Epstein Victims
Attorney RRA
Counsel for other Epstein Victims

Steven Jaffe

Stuart Mermelstein

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012709
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016126.txt,"Chart 8: Saudi government non-hydrocarbon and private sector Chart 9: Crowding in domestic private sector investment when the
investment growth are relatively correlated government sector retrenches can be challenging
20 —— Government non-oil nominal GFCF (% of GDP) , 120
—— -Oj 9
110 saeinaiiaie aa (Syme, yoy) Private sector nominal GFCF (% of GDP)
90 = Private sector GFCF (3yma, %yoy) Oil prices (US$/bbI, rhs) r 100
15
+ 80
10 + 60
+ 40
5
20
0 0
MD O DN OW Ore tktTrHRe FDO MOD Oo DN Oo MOO ON HO DWOwrewtrTFreoemMeIaeae aN
~Y b&b Bb wWWDWOIeeeoDo oe Ddd Go GB Se = ~-eHeRRrRwWA WDA ODWGdG Bo =
22222 2 22 2% 8 8 RRA 2P22222 2 2228 RR G8
Source: Haver, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. GFCF refers to Gross Fixed Capital Formation. Source: Haver, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. GFCF refers to Gross Fixed Capital Formation.
Ambitious non-oil export and tourism targets, but little details
The NTP targets increasing non-oil exports by SAR145bn (US$38bn, 6.0% of GDP) to
SAR330bn (USS$88bn, 11.4% of 2020f GDP) over the next five years. Although
implementation details are lacking, we anticipate that part of the increase could be
linked to the higher mining output targeted. These would nevertheless be dependent on
the global economic cycle. Higher exports of refined oil products, if all of the additional
capacity to be installed by 2020 is exported, could add cUS$7.3bn to exports at current
price levels (but not qualify towards non-oil exports targets under the NTP as they are
classified as hydrocarbon exports). Currently, 61% of Saudi non-oil exports represents
chemicals and plastics, and maintains a correlation with oil prices, and re-exports
account for another 17% of total non-oil exports and have little added-value.
Chart 10: Chemicals, plastics, re-exports form bulk of non-oil exports Chart 11: Non-oil exports are diversified in terms of destination
SARbn Samm other
200 food
ME machinery oe
l= metals
150 ma re-exports 80
“ms plastics
mam Chemicals 60
100 = Brent (US$/bbl, rhs)
=———=non-oil exports (% of total, rhs) / 40
50
20
0 0
SBSSSSSESRSSSSSSSE mAsia =GCC mMENA @EU m Other
TTT TT TTT NNN NINN ON Os
Source: Haver, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Source: Haver, BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.

Likewise, the focus on religious tourism is appropriate given its importance in Saudi
Arabia but NTP targets appear ambitious to us with a targeted 20%yoy CAGR increase
in Umrah pilgrims. Religious tourism accounted for c40% of total tourist expenditure in
Saudi Arabia in 2015, bringing in proceeds of SAR33.4bn (US$8.9bn; 1.4% of GDP). Note
that, for balance of payment purposes, total tourism revenues stood instead at
SAR37.9bn (US$10.1bn; 1.6% of GDP). The NTP targets would thus imply religious
tourism external revenues/expenditures to increase to US$10-US$20bn (1.3-2.6% of
2020f GDP). This would be helpful on the external front but not a game changer on its
own, in our view.

16 GEMs Paper #26 | 30 June 2016 3S Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016126
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033390.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 5/11/2018 8:31:29 PM 
To: Landon Thomas 
Subject: Re: Maybe you can answer this question... 
nixon adage-- follow the.. 
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:26 AM Thomas Jr., Landon wrote: 
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2o18/o5/ii/alan-dershowitz-donald-trump-what-
happened-21835q 
Landon Thomas, Jr. 
Financial Reporter 
New York Times 
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.  
html  
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033390 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt,"Date: Friday, November 4 2016 10:58 PM 
Subject: Re: told you , the case ws a fake 
From: Eva Dubin < 
To: 
EEEE 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 4, 2016, at 6:24 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com > wrote: 
> 
jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>; 
The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 
11/4/2016 
Case Name: Doe v. Trump et al 
Case Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA 
Filer: Jane Doe 
Document Number: 15 
Docket Text: 
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules 
of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the 
above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All 
Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas) 
1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to: 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030347 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028508.txt,"From: Boris Nikolic 
Sent: 6/6/2014 2:23:23 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein (jeeyacation@gmail.com) [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: nanosatelites are getting hot 
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21603441-where-nanosats-boldly-go-new-businesses-will-followunless-they-
are-smothered-excessive  
Technology — Full text articles 
Satellites: Space: the next startup frontier 
The Economist 
AROUND 1,000 operational satellites are circling the Earth, some of them the size and weight of a large car. In the past 
year they have been joined by junior offspring: 100 or so small satellites, some of them made up of one or more 10cm 
(4-inch) cubes. They may be tiny, but each is vastly more capable than Sputnik, the first man-made satellite launched 
by Russia in 1957. And many more are coming. 
Space hardware used to cost so much that it was available only to generals, multinationals and the most privileged 
scientists. No more. Many of these nanosats, as small satellites weighing no more than a few kilograms are called, 
have been launched for small companies, startups and university departments, sometimes with finance raised on 
crowdfunding websites. Their construction costs can be down in the tens of thousands of dollars, which makes them 
thousands of times cheaper than today's big satellites. Admittedly, there is much they cannot do, but with that sort of 
price differential, and some ingenious use of the abilities they do have, they could be surprisingly competitive players on 
a number of fronts. In the next five years another 1,000 nanosats are expected to be launched. 
Two trends are setting up nanosats for further success. Like people working on everything from robots to 3D printers, 
nanosat builders are harvesting the benefits of ever better, ever cheaper components built for smartphones and other 
consumer electronics. Some nanosats even contain complete smartphones, making use of the clever operating 
systems, radios and cameras which phones now contain. For as long as phones go on getting cheaper and more 
capable, so will nanosats. The cheapest so far—a tiny chipsat—was assembled for just $25, though it has yet to be 
successfully launched. 
The launch systems too are getting much cheaper. SpaceX, the innovative rocket-maker founded by Elon Musk, has 
already brought down the costs of getting into space; it and its competitors could reduce them a lot further. The biggest 
beneficiaries will at first be people who make big satellites. But more big satellites will mean more opportunities for 
small satellites to piggy-back on their launches. And some companies are looking at cheap little launch systems tailored 
specifically to the needs of the nanosatellite. One reason space engineers are notoriously conservative is that the costs 
of failure are high. As making and launching satellites gets cheaper, it will be ever easier for innovative, risk-taking 
nanosat-makers to orbit around the lumbering incumbents. 
Size does impose limits. Nanosats cannot peer as closely at the Earth or carry out as many experiments as big 
satellites. But for some jobs that does not matter. The plans that companies already have include using nanosats for 
monitoring crops, studying the sun and tracking ships and aircraft. Such a system might have been able to track 
Malaysian Airlines flight MH370, which went missing in March. 
Nano can do 
Yet not everyone is thrilled. One worry is that constellations of nanosats will mean a big increase in space junk; but, 
operating in low-Earth orbit, they burn up on re-entry after a year or so. And being cheap, they can soon be replaced 
with newer models. A more serious concern is that they are a ""dual-use"" technology: they could be used for military 
purposes. In America this has led to onerous restrictions. 
Barack Obama's administration has sensibly repealed a law of 1999 that required all satellites to be licensed by the 
State Department as munitions under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). This could mean that most 
commercial satellites will be removed from ITAR by the end of the year and their export administered by the Commerce 
Department. But some satellite systems and spacecraft—including anything that can carry people into space—will 
remain under ITAR. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028508 
Care needs to be taken with military kit, but America's regulations still seem excessive. A regular review to distinguish 
between systems that pose a real threat and ones that don't would be a help, as would better intelligence. Tight 
restrictions on new technologies will not work, and will damage America's interests: exciting new ventures like nanosats 
will simply move to countries from which they can be launched with greater ease. 
Back to top 
Nanosatellites: Nanosats are go! 
The Economist 
ALTHOUGH widely used, satellites are expensive to build and to launch. That began to change last year. On November 
19th Orbital Sciences, an American company, launched a rocket from the Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. It carried 29 
satellites aloft and released them into low-Earth orbit, a record for a single mission. Thirty hours later, Kosmotras, a 
Russian joint-venture, carried 32 satellites into a similar orbit. Then, in January 2014, Orbital Sciences carried 33 
satellites up to the International Space Station (ISS), where they were cast off a month later. 
Many of these 94 satellites were built in a standard format known as a CubeSat, a 10cm (4 inch) cube weighing 1.3kg 
(2.91b) or less. Some comprised units of two or three cubes. After a decade of fits and starts, during which some 75 
CubeSats were launched, satellites of this scale and other small satellites are moving from being experimental kit to 
delivering useful scientific data and commercial services. 
In the next five years or so some 1,000 nanosats, as small satellites of 1-10kg are called, are expected to be launched. 
Some will be smaller than a CubeSat; others bigger and heavier. Some are like a matryoshka doll: the Russian launch 
included a satellite that launched eight smaller ones, including four PocketQubes (a 5cm cube format). One of these 
smaller satellites, developed in Peru, released its own tiny bird. 
There will be upsets along the way. In April, as part of a mission by SpaceX, an American company, to resupply the 
ISS, a small mothership was placed in orbit carrying 104 ""sprites"" (pictured below). Not much larger than a postage 
stamp, these contain all the basic elements of a satellite, such as a radio, aerials, a solar cell and instruments. 
Developed as part of a crowd-funded project called KickSat at Cornell University, each sprite cost just $25 in parts. 
Their launch was free, courtesy of NASA, the American space agency. The sprites were designed to remain in orbit for 
a few weeks collecting data before burning up on re-entry. Unfortunately, due to a fault with a timer, the mothership 
failed to release them before it burned up on re-entry. A second mission is now being planned. 
No going back 
Despite that setback, the way ahead for satellite technology is clear. ""You can now, with a single chip, create most of 
the capabilities that you would have found in Sputnik, but, of course, orders of magnitude faster,"" says Mason Peck, a 
former chief technologist at NASA and now a professor at Cornell University. 
The most ambitious project to date is a flock of 28 nanosats, each one three CubeSats in size (ie, 30cm long). These 
were carried to the ISS in January and released in batches (pictured at the beginning of this article) through a sort of 
satellite shooter developed by NanoRacks, an American company. These nanosats came from Planet Labs, a firm 
based in San Francisco. The satellites now take pictures as they scan the Earth more frequently than traditional ones 
and at a fraction of the cost, albeit at a lower resolution. 
Planet Labs, funded modestly with $65m of private investment, says its nanosats provide much of the performance of a 
conventional satellite for a fraction of the cost. That reflects a lot of antiquated technology in the space business, much 
of which can be bettered by the latest off-the-shelf equipment, says Will Marshall, Planet Labs' boss. There are other 
cost-saving measures. Satellites are usually built in elaborate clean rooms, but Planet Labs assembles its nanosats in 
""clean-enough"" rooms in its downtown offices. The company expects to put another 100 nanosats into orbit in the next 
12 to 18 months. 
A few miles away, in another modest San Francisco office, Nanosatisfi is working on its ArduSats. These are open-
source platforms and two have already gone up. They will contain an array of sensors and can carry out various 
missions, such as locating things. More than 250,000 ships, for instance, now broadcast an automatic identification 
signal than carries about 50 nautical miles. A fleet of small satellites in low orbit could pick up these signals and provide 
frequent updates about the ships' positions without the vessels having to use costly dedicated satellite uplinks. Such a 
system might have been able to track Malaysian Airlines flight MH370, which went missing in March. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028509 
Farther south in Mountain View, Skybox captures high-resolution imaging data from its first satellite in orbit as it 
prepares another 23 to launch in the coming years. Some things, though, can be shrunk only so far and larger satellites 
are needed for a telescope to obtain the higher resolutions required for the firm's analysis. While Skybox's minisatellites 
weigh around 100kg, a fairly common size for small satellites, the firm proved its concept to investors using CubeSats. 
""Being able to put something in space at very low cost allows you to demonstrate the technology to get more money,"" 
says Dan Berkenstock, one of the company's founders. 
The CubeSat specification came out of the academic world in the late 1990s. Bob Twiggs, then at Stanford University 
and now at Morehead State University, was frustrated by long delays on a large-satellite programme and set about 
thinking how much satellite capability might be crammed into a much smaller craft that could be launched cheaply. 
Space launches usually comprise one or more primary payloads and require ballast to balance the rocket. CubeSats, 
reasoned Mr Twiggs, could take the place of some of this ballast, so long as they did not jeopardise the main mission. 
The optimum size Mr Twiggs came up with was based on a box used to display Beanie Babies. Later, with Jordi Puig-
Suari of California Polytechnic State University, it was turned into a full specification. Mr Twiggs also developed the 5cm 
PocketQube, which has a maximum weight of 180 grammes. 
Small satellites benefit from the constant improvements in price and performance being achieved by the consumer-
electronics industry, particularly in smartphones. A typical phone is now likely to contain an accelerometer to measure 
how fast it is moving, a magnetometer to detect magnetic fields and provide a compass reading, a GPS receiver to pick 
up satellite data, multiple radios, a gyroscope to measure its position, a barometer to detect pressure, two cameras and 
much more. 
Last year the world's first ""phonesat"" went into orbit. It was a Google Nexus One smartphone incorporated into a three-
unit CubeSat called STRaND-1. This was built by Surrey Satellite Technology, a British firm that specialises in small 
satellites and which is part of the European Airbus group. The idea was to test the components of the smartphone in a 
space environment. The phone was loaded with a number of experimental apps for such things as taking photographs 
and recording magnetic fields during orbit. 
Smartphones and other consumer electronics provide a wealth of ready-made technologies that can enable a CubeSat 
to perform many of the functions of a satellite a hundred times heavier and much larger, but at substantially less cost. 
Including the launch, a nanosat of CubeSat dimensions might cost $150,000-1m, rather than $200m-1 billion for a full-
sized one. 
Low cost and a tolerance of less-stringent standards allow multiple nanosats to be built faster. This allows for a higher 
risk of failure. Nanosats have a relatively short life, which might be no more than a year or two in low-Earth orbit before 
re-entering the atmosphere and burning up. Planet Labs, for one, expects to replace some of its nanosats with new 
versions every year. 
Into space in a flash 
In an industry in which preparing some missions has taken decades, the speed at which nanosats can be developed 
and put into orbit makes the biggest in the space business take notice. NASA has also found ways to leverage the 
consumer-electronics industry, says Bruce Yost of the space agency's Ames Research Centre in California. His group 
(some former members of which founded Planet Labs) has launched five phonesats and is now planning a small fleet of 
them to experiment with communications between satellites. 
Nanosat parts are readily available to researchers. One supplier, Pumpkin, operates from a residential San Francisco 
neighbourhood. Andrew Kalman, its founder, started in 2000 selling standard components that Mr Twiggs and his 
colleagues at Stanford needed. Pumpkin now sells items ranging from brackets for a few hundred dollars up to 
complete systems for hundreds of thousands of dollars. The company has also supplied America's National 
Reconnaissance Office with 12 three-unit CubeSats to help the agency demonstrate the technology. 
Although many satellites already circle the globe taking pictures, some of the images may not be updated for days, 
months or even years. Commercial services can provide relatively rapid satellite images on demand, a number of them 
taking pictures down to a resolution of 50cm (ie, 50cm x 50cm per pixel, the legal limit in America for commercial 
satellites, although military ones can peer closer). But such satellites may cover only part of the globe each day. Once 
their fleets are complete, Planet Labs will offer images with resolutions of between 500cm to 300cm and Skybox, with 
its bigger minisatellites, 90cm. The companies will provide pictures that can be updated in hours for a variety of 
scientific and commercial applications. 
They could, for instance, be used to track environmental conditions, illegal tree-felling or changes in the course of 
rivers—which, even in their initial deployment, Planet Labs has discovered happen surprisingly often. The frequency of 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028510 
satellite passes opens up many new possibilities, says Skybox's Mr Berkenstock. His firm can offer a stream of 
analysis, such as the number of trees in a forest or the number of cars at various times of the day in parking lots across 
America. Transport patterns can be followed, infrastructure monitored, the planting of fields, plumes from smokestacks 
and ships in ports can all be observed. Overlaying more and more data will provide much richer visualisation, adds Mr 
Berkenstock. 
Nor will all the nanosats be looking downwards. Sensors facing sideways and upwards from low-Earth orbit will allow 
researchers to carry out a large number of experiments and to take measurements that have previously been too costly 
to consider. This includes detecting solar and cosmic radiation, interactions between magnetic fields and other forces 
which together make up what is called space weather. Measuring and predicting space weather could be used to 
protect billion-dollar satellites and prevent astronauts from receiving high doses of radiation. Many satellites measure 
aspects of space weather, but they tend to do so only in certain directions. Part of the failed KickSat experiment was to 
use the sprites to see if arrays of inexpensive devices could constantly monitor such forces. 
Nanosats may be inexpensive, but resisting gravity's inexorable pull comes with a price tag. Although there is no 
standard price list for a launch, a CubeSat costs roughly $100,000 to put each 1.3kg unit into low-Earth orbit. A three-
unit CubeSat might cost as much as $400,000. Jeff Foust, an analyst at Futron, a consultancy, studies launch costs 
and says he has heard of charges as low as $30,000 for a single CubeSat launched on a Russian rocket. 
These prices put nanosats in the reach not just of small firms, but also of start-ups and researchers relying on academic 
grants. Some schools are also planning nanosat experiments. Bulk-buying launches for heavier combined payloads can 
work out, per kilo, even cheaper. And these costs could come down, too. Elon Musk, SpaceX's boss, has consistently 
predicted substantial price drops in launch costs, even to as little as $200 per kilo. The firm's Falcon 9 rocket recently 
demonstrated a successful controlled descent of its booster stage, which would allow it to be reused. 
There is plenty of innovation in putting smaller payloads into space. Interorbital Systems, a Californian company, 
recently carried out a successful suborbital test flight of a small rocket (pictured right) designed to carry a 145kg 
payload. The company has presold berths for dozens of CubeSats at $13,000-38,000 per unit, as well as its own 
TubeSat format, which it offers to academia as kit and launch for $8,000. 
NASA will test an air-launched system in 2016 with Generation Orbit, an Atlanta company. It uses a Gulfstream G-IV 
executive jet to carry aloft a rocket which it fires off to put 45-50kg payloads into low-Earth orbit. NASA is also working 
with Virgin Galactic, a private space venture led by Richard Branson. Virgin Galactic has developed its LauncherOne, 
another air-launched rocket. It can be flown to a higher altitude and carry payloads up to 225kg. 
Neither Generation Orbit or Virgin Galactic may come down much on price, as both see a profit to be made in offering 
regular launches, even weekly ones. Operators whose nanosats ride shotgun as ballast in other missions do not have 
much control over when they launch or the orbits they reach, says William Pomerantz, the head of special projects at 
Virgin Galactic. John Olds, boss of Generation Orbit, says that as constellations of nanosats increase, placing them in a 
precise orbit will be critical in keeping small-satellite networks operating. 
The nanosat wars 
Nanosats also face two other limiting factors: communications and propulsion. Those used for academic work 
principally rely on amateur-radio frequencies, with basic equipment squeezed into the CubeSat form. Transmission and 
reception are further hindered by the size of antennae or dishes, both on the ground and on the satellites. Many 
academic projects set up their own listening stations and recruit space buffs who can use inexpensive kit, but these 
work on an informal basis. Companies tend to use licensed frequencies and plump for more expensive radio gear to 
handle their data flows. More development in communications equipment and investment in ground stations would 
improve things. 
The other bugbear, propulsion, is harder to solve. Currently, launch operators can prevent nanosats carrying hazardous 
propellants that might be used to power them to another orbit. Nor have engineers had a reason to design tiny 
spaceship engines using safer fuel. But they do now. Even a basic capability to push in one direction would allow 
nanosats to remain in orbit longer, or allow a satellite that has been placed into low-Earth orbit, using an inexpensive 
launch provider, to nudge itself to a higher geostationary orbit. And some might travel far beyond Earth. 
Benjamin Longmier of the University of Michigan and founder of Aether Industries, which makes equipment for high-
altitude research, has begun production of a nanosat propulsion system based on his previous work at the Johnson 
Space Station in Texas. This is a rocket that uses ionised propellants accelerated by magnetic fields. He has been able 
to scale this down to CubeSat size, using liquid water or solid iodine as the propellant. Dr Longmier says the system 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028511 
could allow a constellation of satellites to remain in the correct position relative to one another, move satellites to polar 
orbit from less-expensive launch insertions or increase an orbit. 
Surrey Satellite Technology's STRaND-1 also contained a couple of experimental propulsion systems. One is a re-entry 
device that ejects a mixture of water and alcohol to tip the nanosat out of orbit at the end of its useful life. The other is 
an array of pulsed-plasma thrusters which heat and evaporate a material to produce a charged gas to push the satellite 
along. 
NASA has plans to offer a $5m prize using a six-unit CubeSat for groups to demonstrate ways both to communicate 
across large distances and display the effective use of unconventional propellants. Jennifer Gustetic, in charge of 
NASA's prizes, says the winner will have to show that their systems are survivable and can be operated far out into 
space. The programme is still at an early stage, but it could involve transporting the CubeSats for release into orbit 
around the Moon. But NASA has competition. Dr Longmier believes his technology can beat NASA to the Moon without 
the use of an additional spacecraft to carry the CubeSets there. And James Cutler, a satellite-propulsion expert now 
also at the University of Michigan, thinks he can propel small birds even deeper into space. Let the nanosat wars begin. 
Back to top 
-thirds. 
Back to top 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028512 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028589.txt,"From: Weingarten, Reid as

Sent: 1/26/2019 7:19:44 PM
To: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: Re:

Calm down....it was about 30 years ago, fleeting (and not that bad)

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 2:12 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re:

sorry but i cant get the image of a naked lily sanchez out of my head.

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:43 PM Weingarten, Reid i wrote:

So knew what your answer was going to be

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: J

Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:39 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re: Re:

kathy would tacke me if 1 were to save you :)

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:30 PM Weingarten, Reid - — «f wrote:

Just want to make sure if brad and reid were in a burning building and you could save only ONE.......c:cccecceeesseeeeeees

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:21 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re: Re:

of course not. ! I've been called many things in the press recently -- retarded - is not one of them

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 7:14 PM Weingarten, Reid > wrote:

Very small fucking world....obviously don’t mention my role with brad till we both think it useful

From: J [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:12 PM
To: Weingarten, Reid

Subject: Re: Re:

brad represent softbank ,not rajeev , but did speak to him yesterday, re DB

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028589
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013371.txt,"represented them in a civil action against Epstein. Nothing in Edwards’s capable and competent
representation of his clients can serve as the basis for a civil lawsuit against him. Allegations
about Edwards’s participation in or knowledge of the use of the civil actions against Epstein in a
“Ponzi Scheme” are not supported by any competent evidence and could never be supported by
competent evidence as they are entirely false.

: A. Epstein’s Complaint

Epstein’s Second Amended Complaint essentially alleges that Epstein was damaged by
Edwards, acting in concert with Scott Rothstein (President of the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law
fit (“RRA”) where Edwards worked for a short period of time). Epstein appears to allege that
pabanie joined Rothstein in the abusive prosecution of sexual assault cases against Epstein to
“pump” the cases to Ponzi scheme investors. As described by Epstein, investor victims were
told by Rothstein that three minor girls who were sexually assaulted by Epstein: L.M., E.W., and
I ane Doe were to be paid up-front money to prevent those girls from settling their civil cases
against Epstein. In Epstein’s view, these child sexual assault cases had “minimal value”
(Complaint & 42(h)), and Edwards’s refusal to force his clients to accept modest settlement
offers is claimed to breach some duty that Edwards owed to Epstein. Interestingly, Epstein never
states that he actually made any settlement offers.

: The supposed “proof” of the Complaint’s allegations against Edwards includes
Edwards’s alleged contacts with the media, his attempts to obtain discovery from high-profile
persons with whom Epstein socialized, and use of “ridiculously inflammatory” language in
arguments in court. Remarkably, Epstein has filed such allegations against Edwards despite the

fact that Epstein had sexually abused each of Edwards’s clients and others while they were

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013371
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032198.txt,"28

current headlines, begin with the Arab world, but the answers such as
there are will, nevertheless, ultimately come in from the East. It 1s in
those Asian lands that conventional Western philosophical precepts
are challenged. The ideology by which Asian autocrats stand in
opposition to the likes of Mill and Berlin falls—to some extent—
under the rubric of Confucianism. Confucianism is more a sensibility
than a political doctrine. It stresses traditional authority, particularly
that of the family, as the sine qua non of political tranquility. The
well-being of the community takes precedence over that of the
individual. Morality is inseparable from one’s social obligation to the
kin group and the powers that be. The Western—and particularly the
American—tendency is to be suspicious of power and central
authority; whereas the Asian tendency is to worry about disorder.
Thus, it is in Asia, much more so than in the Middle East, where
autocracy can give the Western notion of freedom a good run for its
money. The fact that even a chaotic democracy is better than the rule
of a Mubarak or a Ben Ali proves nothing. But is a chaotic
democracy better than the rule of autocrats who have overseen GDP
growth rates of 10 percent annually over the past three decades? It is
in places like China, Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam where good
dictators have produced economic miracles. These in turn have led to
the creation of wide-ranging personal freedoms, even as these leaders
have compelled people against their will on a grand scale. Here the
debate gets interesting.

Indeed, probably one of the most morally vexing realizations in the
field of international politics is that Deng Xiaoping, by dramatically
raising the living standard of hundreds of millions of Chinese in such
a comparatively short space of time—which, likewise, led to an
unforeseen explosion in personal freedoms across China—was,
despite the atrocity of Tiananmen Square that he helped perpetrate,
one of the great men of the twentieth century. Deng’s successors,

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032198
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022112.txt,"ATTERSON

__who was also a step-uncle of
Ward to drop the story. But Ward
came back with was dynamite.
re salacious than anything Carter

ting in the hours it would take to |
ncovered, picking the ones they \ CHAPTER 37

1 all out in a narrative that would

acts it contained.

Vicky Ward: October 2002

pstein went out of his way to spin the Vanity Fair story to
; his own ends, and soon after she got the assignment, Vicky
st : <4 Ward’s phone began to ring off the hook: calls from Ace
| Greenberg and Jimmy Cayne, the current head of Bear Stearns;

from Les Wexner; from academics, scientists, and movers and
shakers who counted Epstein among their friends.

Then there were the calls from Epstein himself. He wouldn't
_ go on the record, but despite the rumors he'd spread behind
: Ward’s back, he was happy to talk informally, even give her a
4 tour of his Manhattan mansion and trot out stories that he had
dined out on for years. By most accounts, Epstein could be
"" extremely charming—even if it had taken Ghislaine to teach
“him which forks to use when—and he did his best to charm
Vicky Ward. But she was not easily seduced, and she turned out

to have a keen eye for Epstein’s missteps.

q

145

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022112
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029616.txt,"From: Larry Summers 
Sent: 3/17/2019 1:56:54 AM 
To: J [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Disaster but maybe i 
Importance: High 
Not funny 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Mar 16, 2019, at 7:07 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
you could say something like . try not to call him larry by mistake.. though it would be amusing. 
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 5:38 PM Larry Summers • wrote: 
Figuring out how. 
Could say she has now used up 80 percent of what she was owed through my changes in plan. 
Or say xi changes meeting w trump. 
I think she is tired of this alas. 
Sustaining w secrecy hard. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Mar 16, 2019, at 5:27 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Firm delivered through humor 
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 5:16 PM Larry Summers <___________________________> wrote: 
No I meant that thanking her will be wierd because we had 45 minutes of friendly convo before the bit I 
described. 
I'll wait till tmrw and send her some article and then say some version of your msg. 
At some point need more firmness though. 
Sent from my iPhone 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029616 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Mar 16, 2019, at 5:10 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
And? 
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 4:33 PM Larry Summers < 
Doesnt work I talked to her for 45 minutes. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
> wrote: 
On Mar 16, 2019, at 4:16 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
Just send, happy for the time we spent together- have fun see you soon 
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 3:57 PM Larry Summers 
I'm really mad at the deception. 
Should I just wait for her to call? 
> wrote: 
This guy different. Maybe married or old or something. I sense from body language she is really attracted 
but he is unsuitable as partner. 
I can hardly be possessive under circumstances but schedule changing because she gets a better offer is not 
acceptable. 
If I say this she will rage back about times I changed plans because of family and work constraints. 
She knew I was upset. I think significant chance she 11 send note saying this may not be fair to you why 
Not take time off or that she will say this. 
In her way very tough. 
But nothing for now. 
R from my iPhone 
Larry 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029617 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office atl 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
On Mar 16, 2019, at 3:19 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
shes smart. making you pay for past errors.. ignore the daddy im going to go out with the 
motorcycle guy, . you reacted well.. annoyed shows caring. , no whining showed strentgh. 
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 3:08 PM Larry Summers ‹> wrote: 
We talked on phone. Then ""I can't talk later"". Dint think I can talk tomorrow"". 
I said what are you up to. She said ""I'm busy"". I said awfully coy u are. 
And then I said. Did u really rearrange the weekend we were going to be together because guy number 3 
was coming"" 
She said no his schedule changed after we changed our plans. 
I said ok I got to go call me when u feel like it. Tone was not of good feeling. 
I dint want to be in a gift giving competition while being the friend without benefits. 
Think time to just stay away for a while. If there is potential here shell find way back. 
I think I'm too eager weak at this point. The Prada thing by someone else is natural. By me seems 
desperate. 
Had good sense not to send off a note. 
She must be very confused or maybe wants to cut me off but wants professional connection a lot and so 
holds to it. 
I think life as stand by in case she needs leverage against another guy sucks. 
But I get when I think about it stay cool. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029618 
On Mar 16, 2019, at 2:10 PM, J <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
how was it communicated to you? 
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 1:59 PM Larry Summers_________________________> wrote: 
guy 3 seems to be in London for weekend which is why my visit cut short. 
I got mad. Didn't send angry note after call though. 
This is a ridiculous activity. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter glhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029619 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029620 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 029621 
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011906.txt,"Markus Strobel

Marti Noxon

Maxeme Tuchman
Maye Musk

Melissa Arnoldi
Michaela Angela Davis
Michelle Goldberg
Mindy Grossman
Misty Copeland

Naomi Wadler
Nicholas Kristof, honorary female
Norah O'Donnell
Patricia Evangelista
Paula Polito

Perri Peltz

Robin Roberts

Ronan Farrow, honorary female
Rula Jebreal

Sade Baderinwa

Sally Yates

Saru Jayaraman

Sheila Nevins

Sophie Gregoire Trudeau
Stephanie Mehta
Sunitha Krishnan

Dr. Suzanne Barakat
Tamara Chergoleishvili
Terry Crews

Topeka Sam

Viola Davis

Yevgenia Albats
Zainab Salbi

Tina Brown | Founder and CEO
Tina Brown Live Media/Women in the World

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011906
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031059.txt,"﻿{""advertisingSettings"":{""enabled"":true,""frequency"":5},""autoplacement"":{""advertisement"":{""enabled"":true,""frequency"":5}},""componentLayouts"":{""_defaultComponentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""_defaultComponentLayout""},""articleHeaderContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""articleHeaderContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""20.0pt"",""top"":""10.0pt""}},""articleRubricContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""articleRubricContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""10.0pt"",""top"":""10.0pt""}},""blockquoteContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""blockquoteContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""30.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""blockquoteDividerContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":1,""start"":0},""identifier"":""blockquoteDividerContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""10.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""bodyContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""bodyContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""20.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""bylineContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""bylineContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""0.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""dividerShortContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":1,""start"":0},""identifier"":""dividerShortContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""20.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""dividerWithTitleContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""dividerWithTitleContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""7.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""featureArticleHeaderContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""featureArticleHeaderContentLayout"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""both"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""0.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""featureLedeBylineContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""featureLedeBylineContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""10.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""featureLedePhotoContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""featureLedePhotoContentLayout"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""both"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""20.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""imageGalleryImageContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""imageGalleryImageContentLayout"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""both"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""40.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""photoContainerContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""photoContainerContentLayout"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""both""},""photoContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""photoContentLayout"",""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""both"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""10.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""pullquoteAttributionContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""pullquoteAttributionContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""25.0pt"",""top"":""10.0pt""}},""pullquoteBodyContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""pullquoteBodyContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""25.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""singleRelatedStoryHeadingContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":10,""start"":0},""identifier"":""singleRelatedStoryHeadingContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""5.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}},""sponsoredLogoContentLayout"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":1,""start"":0},""identifier"":""sponsoredLogoContentLayout"",""margin"":{""bottom"":""5.0pt"",""top"":""0.0pt""}}},""componentStyles"":{""dividerStrokeStyle"":{""border"":{""top"":{""color"":""#ddd"",""width"":""1.0pt""}},""identifier"":""dividerStrokeStyle""},""productButtonStyle"":{""backgroundColor"":""#111"",""identifier"":""productButtonStyle""}},""componentTextStyles"":{""articleRubricTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Semibold"",""fontSize"":11,""identifier"":""articleRubricTextStyle"",""textColor"":""#222"",""textTransform"":""uppercase"",""tracking"":0.2},""default"":{""fontName"":""Georgia"",""identifier"":""default"",""linkStyle"":{""textColor"":""#1782a9""},""textColor"":""#111""},""default-body"":{""fontSize"":17,""identifier"":""default-body"",""lineHeight"":27},""default-byline"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""fontSize"":12,""identifier"":""default-byline"",""lineHeight"":14,""textColor"":""#000"",""tracking"":0.1},""default-caption"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""fontSize"":12,""identifier"":""default-caption""},""default-intro"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Light"",""fontSize"":33,""identifier"":""default-intro"",""lineHeight"":35,""textColor"":""#9b9b9b""},""default-pullquote"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Medium"",""fontSize"":36,""identifier"":""default-pullquote"",""textAlignment"":""center""},""default-quote"":{""fontName"":""ArialMT"",""fontSize"":16,""identifier"":""default-quote"",""lineHeight"":25,""textColor"":""#5a5a5a""},""default-title"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Light"",""fontSize"":52,""identifier"":""default-title"",""lineHeight"":54},""disclaimerTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""fontSize"":12,""identifier"":""disclaimerTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":14,""textColor"":""#111""},""dividerTitleTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Light"",""fontSize"":42,""identifier"":""dividerTitleTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":44},""featureLedeBylineTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""identifier"":""featureLedeBylineTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":18,""tracking"":0.1},""featureLedeSecondaryBylineTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""identifier"":""featureLedeSecondaryBylineTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":18,""textColor"":""#999"",""tracking"":0.1},""productCtaTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Semibold"",""fontSize"":16,""identifier"":""productCtaTextStyle"",""linkStyle"":{""textColor"":""#fff""},""textAlignment"":""center"",""textColor"":""#fff"",""textTransform"":""uppercase"",""tracking"":0.2},""productDetailTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""fontSize"":12,""identifier"":""productDetailTextStyle"",""textColor"":""#5a5a5a""},""productNameTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Semibold"",""fontSize"":17,""identifier"":""productNameTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":20},""productPriceTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""identifier"":""productPriceTextStyle"",""textColor"":""#111""},""productionCreditsTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""fontSize"":16,""identifier"":""productionCreditsTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":18,""textAlignment"":""center""},""singleRelatedStoryHeadingTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""fontSize"":13,""identifier"":""singleRelatedStoryHeadingTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":22,""textColor"":""#111"",""tracking"":0.2},""singleRelatedStoryTitleTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Medium"",""fontSize"":24,""identifier"":""singleRelatedStoryTitleTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":26,""linkStyle"":{""textColor"":""#000""}},""sourceLinksHeadingTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""ArialMT"",""fontSize"":12,""identifier"":""sourceLinksHeadingTextStyle""},""sourceLinksTextStyle"":{""fontSize"":10,""identifier"":""sourceLinksTextStyle"",""linkStyle"":{""fontName"":""ArialMT"",""textColor"":""#888""}},""subheaderTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Light"",""fontSize"":45,""identifier"":""subheaderTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":47},""subsectionTitleTextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Medium"",""fontSize"":42,""identifier"":""subsectionTitleTextStyle"",""lineHeight"":44},""youtubePlayerBorderTopCTATextStyle"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Semibold"",""fontSize"":13,""identifier"":""youtubePlayerBorderTopCTATextStyle"",""textColor"":""#111"",""textTransform"":""uppercase"",""tracking"":0.2},""youtubePlayerCaptionTextStyle"":{""identifier"":""youtubePlayerCaptionTextStyle"",""textAlignment"":""left""}},""components"":[{""components"":[{""identifier"":""_anf-heading2-1"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":8,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-1""}],""layout"":""articleRubricContentLayout"",""role"":""heading2"",""text"":""PROTESTS"",""textStyle"":""articleRubricTextStyle"",""type"":""text""},{""identifier"":""_anf-title-1"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":64,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-2""}],""layout"":""singleRelatedStoryHeadingContentLayout"",""role"":""title"",""text"":""The Most Powerful Scenes From Today’s #BelieveSurvivors Protests"",""type"":""text""},{""identifier"":""_anf-byline-1"",""layout"":""bylineContentLayout"",""role"":""byline"",""text"":""By Madeleine Aggeler"",""type"":""text""}],""identifier"":""_anf-header-1"",""layout"":""articleHeaderContentLayout"",""role"":""header"",""type"":""container""},{""components"":[{""caption"":""Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call,Inc."",""captionComponent"":{""text"":""Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call,Inc.""},""identifier"":""_anf-photo-1"",""imageIdentifier"":""88c7ee8062b821a9bba74abb8db92686"",""layout"":""photoContentLayout"",""role"":""photo"",""type"":""scalable_image""},{""identifier"":""_anf-caption-1"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":35,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-4""},{""range"":{""length"":35,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-3""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""caption"",""text"":""Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call,Inc."",""type"":""text""}],""identifier"":""_anf-container-1"",""layout"":""photoContainerContentLayout"",""role"":""container"",""type"":""container""},{""additions"":[{""URL"":""https://www.thecut.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-sexual-assault-walkout-monday.html"",""range"":{""length"":25,""start"":113},""type"":""link""}],""identifier"":""_anf-body-1"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":264,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""On Monday afternoon, black-clad people across the country walked out of their schools and offices as part of the #BelieveSurvivors protest to show their support for the two women who have publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct."",""type"":""text""},{""additions"":[{""URL"":""https://apple.news/AMQfZ2UYpRBO399RZOpy8Bg"",""range"":{""length"":17,""start"":65},""type"":""link""},{""URL"":""https://apple.news/AJ79mEVjFTXqnArxaNI0V2Q"",""range"":{""length"":25,""start"":185},""type"":""link""}],""identifier"":""_anf-body-2"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":352,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""},{""range"":{""length"":4,""start"":231},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-14""},{""range"":{""length"":14,""start"":32},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-14""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""The protest comes one day after The New Yorker published Deborah Ramirez’s account of a man she believes to be Kavanaugh shoving his penis in her face at a Yale party. The week before, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford told the Washington Post that in high school, Kavanaugh locked her in a room, pinned her to the bed, and attempted to “force himself on her.”"",""type"":""text""},{""identifier"":""_anf-body-3"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":116,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""},{""range"":{""length"":4,""start"":58},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-14""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford told the Post. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”"",""type"":""text""},{""identifier"":""_anf-body-4"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":229,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""Their stories have strengthened the calls for President Trump to withdraw Kavanaugh as a nominee, and have also reignited a national discussion about how we treat the people who speak up about their experiences of sexual assault."",""type"":""text""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044274178923335680"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-1"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-1"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""1e7dd363f976f6a5a05e6999b113247a"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""additions"":[{""URL"":""https://apple.news/AXvXIP7GmT4yGiJ-ISWsVgg"",""range"":{""length"":33,""start"":233},""type"":""link""},{""URL"":""https://twitter.com/hashtag/WhyIDidntReport?src=hash"",""range"":{""length"":16,""start"":393},""type"":""link""}],""identifier"":""_anf-body-5"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":410,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""Since coming forward, people have tried to discredit, mock, and harass Ford and Ramirez online. Ford and her family have had to move out of their Palo Alto home because she was receiving so many death threats. The president wondered why she didn’t report her assault earlier, a naive comment that led many Twitter users to share why they didn’t come forward about their abuse with the hasthag #WhyIDidntReport."",""type"":""text""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044270946469761026"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-2"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-2"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""c797a8d6d14e527d80af1170cedb2932"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""identifier"":""_anf-body-6"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":142,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""But on Monday, people stepped out to show their support for Kavanaugh’s accusers, as well as all survivors of abuse who haven’t been believed."",""type"":""text""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044274166139154434"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-3"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-3"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""2024b5de70875c6d1fafb1c0538bc775"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""identifier"":""_anf-body-7"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":152,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""},{""range"":{""length"":30,""start"":102},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-14""},{""range"":{""length"":12,""start"":63},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-14""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""Celebrities like Allison Janney, Kerry Washington, the cast of Will & Grace, and the cast and crew of Full Frontal With Samantha Bee joined the walkout."",""type"":""text""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044273675401224194"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-4"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-4"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""93db7c71729c9bb1b4703279a40edb9f"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044280899964219392"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-5"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-5"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""ebd666e16692df90dec7aa28bf642567"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044271971125485572"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-6"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-6"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""43e796dcdca5949dffb7aea9bb4ca3a2"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044273646859104256"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-7"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-7"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""bc786043edd5785e134b0b3643912842"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""identifier"":""_anf-body-8"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":137,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""Politicians including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, First Lady of New York City Chirlane McCray, and Kamala Harris also showed their support."",""type"":""text""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044304396144848898"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-8"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-8"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""e3d3b8ef0bfd867596726c4f51fe63c9"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044270305693388802"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-9"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-9"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""841bc370b33509e55e5a84fc55784203"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044285021635432451"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-10"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-10"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""99d2548d42326d456dbd631ef6f4d899"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""identifier"":""_anf-body-9"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":178,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""And at monuments and government buildings across the capital, protesters and activists gathered to call for Kavanaugh’s withdrawal, and it appears several arrests have been made."",""type"":""text""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044269774266683399"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-11"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-11"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""9b10d21d1dff78a2fe94668d95fa7663"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044234988248616961"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-12"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-12"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""38c4281140974d539408dee3b81f7bb8"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""identifier"":""_anf-body-10"",""inlineTextStyles"":[{""range"":{""length"":39,""start"":0},""textStyle"":""_anf-ts-10""}],""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""body"",""text"":""And the kids, as usual, know what’s up."",""type"":""text""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044272501105274882"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-13"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-13"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""d798bbdfbb9c554172434fe4246d1e32"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""},{""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044277620433543172"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-14"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""role"":""tweet"",""type"":""twitter_embed""},{""embedType"":""tweet"",""identifier"":""_anf-tweet-14"",""layout"":""bodyContentLayout"",""resourceIdentifier"":""8caf26e59085af7215394d0d6f16724d"",""role"":""social_embed"",""type"":""embed""}],""identifier"":""www.thecut.com/_components/article/instances/cjmgks88k000j6xyeskvlujk9"",""language"":""en"",""layout"":{""columns"":10,""gutter"":20,""margin"":85,""width"":1024},""metadata"":{""canonicalURL"":""http://www.thecut.com/2018/09/beleive-survivors-protests-scenes.html"",""datePublished"":""2018-09-24T21:08:57.136Z"",""thumbnailImageIdentifier"":""e22af2d89042914587221179ff4460ba"",""transparentToolbar"":false},""resources"":{""095ac950-8fd4-4760-873f-9e232dbbd6c3"":{""URL"":""asset://095ac950-8fd4-4760-873f-9e232dbbd6c3"",""classification"":""image"",""dimensions"":{""height"":721,""width"":1080},""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""095ac950-8fd4-4760-873f-9e232dbbd6c3"",""imageIdentifier"":""88c7ee8062b821a9bba74abb8db92686"",""type"":""image""},""1e7dd363f976f6a5a05e6999b113247a"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">As women, femmes, and allies stage walkouts across the nation, we’re kicking off our <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/CancelKavanaugh?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#CancelKavanaugh</a> rally on the steps of the Supreme Court. <a href=\""https://t.co/FsRga8RLa9\"">pic.twitter.com/FsRga8RLa9</a></p>&mdash; Women&#39;s March (@womensmarch) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/womensmarch/status/1044274178923335680?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044274178923335680"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""1e7dd363f976f6a5a05e6999b113247a"",""type"":""oembed""},""2024b5de70875c6d1fafb1c0538bc775"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">Women wearing black walked out of their offices at 1 pm, put their fists in the air and said “believe survivors.” This is just one random park in NYC <a href=\""https://t.co/5LsnqL60W0\"">pic.twitter.com/5LsnqL60W0</a></p>&mdash; Laura Bassett (@LEBassett) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/LEBassett/status/1044274166139154434?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044274166139154434"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""2024b5de70875c6d1fafb1c0538bc775"",""type"":""oembed""},""38c4281140974d539408dee3b81f7bb8"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">Dozens getting arrested outside <a href=\""https://twitter.com/SenatorCollins?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">@SenatorCollins</a> office — over 30 of her Maine constituents came down to <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopKavanaugh?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#StopKavanaugh</a>. <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/DaLAd80UU6\"">pic.twitter.com/DaLAd80UU6</a></p>&mdash; Monica Klein (@MonicaCKlein) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/MonicaCKlein/status/1044234988248616961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044234988248616961"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""38c4281140974d539408dee3b81f7bb8"",""type"":""oembed""},""43e796dcdca5949dffb7aea9bb4ca3a2"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">10:00 am at <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/WillAndGrace?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#WillAndGrace</a> ... <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/XmL9aCjC65\"">pic.twitter.com/XmL9aCjC65</a></p>&mdash; Eric McCormack (@EricMcCormack) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/EricMcCormack/status/1044271971125485572?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044271971125485572"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""43e796dcdca5949dffb7aea9bb4ca3a2"",""type"":""oembed""},""6caa9b01-8578-480b-af5b-a4f336874b3d"":{""URL"":""asset://6caa9b01-8578-480b-af5b-a4f336874b3d"",""classification"":""image"",""dimensions"":{""height"":200,""width"":300},""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""6caa9b01-8578-480b-af5b-a4f336874b3d"",""imageIdentifier"":""88c7ee8062b821a9bba74abb8db92686"",""type"":""image""},""841bc370b33509e55e5a84fc55784203"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">I hear you. I believe you. I stand with you. <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/S7vo4hzRwD\"">pic.twitter.com/S7vo4hzRwD</a></p>&mdash; Chirlane McCray (@NYCFirstLady) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/NYCFirstLady/status/1044270305693388802?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044270305693388802"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""841bc370b33509e55e5a84fc55784203"",""type"":""oembed""},""8a287b11-aac4-4f36-b552-19e42986692c"":{""URL"":""asset://8a287b11-aac4-4f36-b552-19e42986692c"",""classification"":""font"",""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"":{""familyName"":""Canela"",""style"":""normal"",""weight"":300,""width"":""normal""},""fontName"":""Canela-Light"",""identifier"":""8a287b11-aac4-4f36-b552-19e42986692c"",""type"":""font""},""8caf26e59085af7215394d0d6f16724d"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">Im Jake Cohen and I’m one of the directors of SASHA. Only two kids (Sabine&amp; I) out of 1700 from our school walked out today. Regardless-we support survivors. We the youth reject Brett Kavanagh. We the youth say no to sexual violence. <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeTheStudentsDoNotConsent?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#WeTheStudentsDoNotConsent</a> <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/bIj0GZh5vi\"">pic.twitter.com/bIj0GZh5vi</a></p>&mdash; The Sasha Initiative (@sashainitiative) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/sashainitiative/status/1044277620433543172?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044277620433543172"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""8caf26e59085af7215394d0d6f16724d"",""type"":""oembed""},""93db7c71729c9bb1b4703279a40edb9f"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">We stand with <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChristineBlaseyFord?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#ChristineBlaseyFord</a> <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> ⁦<a href=\""https://twitter.com/MimiKennedyLA?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">@MimiKennedyLA</a>⁩ ⁦<a href=\""https://twitter.com/AnnaKFaris?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">@AnnaKFaris</a>⁩ <a href=\""https://t.co/TERPQZuAQC\"">pic.twitter.com/TERPQZuAQC</a></p>&mdash; Allison Janney (@AllisonBJanney) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/AllisonBJanney/status/1044273675401224194?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044273675401224194"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""93db7c71729c9bb1b4703279a40edb9f"",""type"":""oembed""},""99d2548d42326d456dbd631ef6f4d899"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">Wore black today in support of all survivors of sexual assault or abuse. We won&#39;t let them be silenced or ignored. <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/immVdGsepx\"">pic.twitter.com/immVdGsepx</a></p>&mdash; Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1044285021635432451?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044285021635432451"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""99d2548d42326d456dbd631ef6f4d899"",""type"":""oembed""},""9b10d21d1dff78a2fe94668d95fa7663"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">NOW: The walkout begins in the Hart Senate Office Building. <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/QqdyOV4DUW\"">pic.twitter.com/QqdyOV4DUW</a></p>&mdash; NWLC (@nwlc) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/nwlc/status/1044269774266683399?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044269774266683399"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""9b10d21d1dff78a2fe94668d95fa7663"",""type"":""oembed""},""9eb6829b-ff32-4a4c-be37-480afb9e04d5"":{""URL"":""asset://9eb6829b-ff32-4a4c-be37-480afb9e04d5"",""classification"":""image"",""dimensions"":{""height"":500,""width"":750},""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""9eb6829b-ff32-4a4c-be37-480afb9e04d5"",""imageIdentifier"":""88c7ee8062b821a9bba74abb8db92686"",""type"":""image""},""a8fe00e0-ff01-4c8f-93d4-69177aabf082"":{""URL"":""asset://a8fe00e0-ff01-4c8f-93d4-69177aabf082"",""classification"":""font"",""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"":{""familyName"":""Chap"",""style"":""normal"",""weight"":400,""width"":""normal""},""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""identifier"":""a8fe00e0-ff01-4c8f-93d4-69177aabf082"",""type"":""font""},""b2e02a94-095d-446a-afca-5f3e2d3761ea"":{""URL"":""asset://b2e02a94-095d-446a-afca-5f3e2d3761ea"",""classification"":""image"",""dimensions"":{""height"":934,""width"":1400},""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""b2e02a94-095d-446a-afca-5f3e2d3761ea"",""imageIdentifier"":""88c7ee8062b821a9bba74abb8db92686"",""type"":""image""},""bc786043edd5785e134b0b3643912842"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">Our staff is walking out in solidarity with <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/MeToomvmt?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#MeToomvmt</a>. <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/8O8FQlZfil\"">pic.twitter.com/8O8FQlZfil</a></p>&mdash; Full Frontal (@FullFrontalSamB) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/FullFrontalSamB/status/1044273646859104256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044273646859104256"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""bc786043edd5785e134b0b3643912842"",""type"":""oembed""},""c355b069-3d3a-4163-ba7e-2317c93e456d"":{""URL"":""asset://c355b069-3d3a-4163-ba7e-2317c93e456d"",""classification"":""font"",""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"":{""familyName"":""Chap"",""style"":""normal"",""weight"":600,""width"":""normal""},""fontName"":""Chap-Semibold"",""identifier"":""c355b069-3d3a-4163-ba7e-2317c93e456d"",""type"":""font""},""c797a8d6d14e527d80af1170cedb2932"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">LIVE: Video of protesters getting arrested, after taking over the Russell rotunda in the Senate building to protest Kavanaugh. They are chanting “We believe the women!” <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/gr2i29UmRK\"">pic.twitter.com/gr2i29UmRK</a></p>&mdash; Scott Dworkin (@funder) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/funder/status/1044270946469761026?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044270946469761026"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""c797a8d6d14e527d80af1170cedb2932"",""type"":""oembed""},""d798bbdfbb9c554172434fe4246d1e32"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">We walked out today because NOT all high school boys are rapists like <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/Kavanaugh?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#Kavanaugh</a> and because, unlike the gop senate, we <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <br><br>Thank you Dr Christine Ford for standing up <a href=\""https://t.co/asu1O6FIMg\"">pic.twitter.com/asu1O6FIMg</a></p>&mdash; Jack Torres (@JackTorres00) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/JackTorres00/status/1044272501105274882?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044272501105274882"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""d798bbdfbb9c554172434fe4246d1e32"",""type"":""oembed""},""da11b4d5-a110-42d0-b283-44735e9b0b33"":{""URL"":""asset://da11b4d5-a110-42d0-b283-44735e9b0b33"",""classification"":""font"",""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"":{""familyName"":""Canela"",""style"":""normal"",""weight"":500,""width"":""normal""},""fontName"":""Canela-Medium"",""identifier"":""da11b4d5-a110-42d0-b283-44735e9b0b33"",""type"":""font""},""e3d3b8ef0bfd867596726c4f51fe63c9"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">We <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a>. <br><br>Special thanks to local <a href=\""https://twitter.com/MomsDemand?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">@MomsDemand</a> members for coming by Corona for today’s walkout.<br><br>To all survivors out there - know that you are loved and accepted.<br><br>You don’t have to carry this weight on your own. <a href=\""https://t.co/oEkYDuv2Pf\"">pic.twitter.com/oEkYDuv2Pf</a></p>&mdash; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Ocasio2018) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/Ocasio2018/status/1044304396144848898?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044304396144848898"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""e3d3b8ef0bfd867596726c4f51fe63c9"",""type"":""oembed""},""ebd666e16692df90dec7aa28bf642567"":{""HTML"":""<blockquote class=\""twitter-tweet\""><p lang=\""en\"" dir=\""ltr\"">Women must be heard. Today I am wearing black in solidarity with Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/BelieveSurvivors?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#BelieveSurvivors</a> <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/TIMESUP?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#TIMESUP</a> <a href=\""https://twitter.com/hashtag/StopKavanaugh?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">#StopKavanaugh</a> <a href=\""https://t.co/pSZhEIr0Xe\"">pic.twitter.com/pSZhEIr0Xe</a></p>&mdash; kerry washington (@kerrywashington) <a href=\""https://twitter.com/kerrywashington/status/1044280899964219392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>\n<script async src=\""https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js\"" charset=\""utf-8\""></script>\n"",""URL"":""https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/oembed.json?id=1044280899964219392"",""classification"":""embed"",""expirationDate"":""2069-12-07T00:00:00.000Z"",""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""ebd666e16692df90dec7aa28bf642567"",""type"":""oembed""}},""specVersion"":""1.6"",""subtitle"":"""",""textStyles"":{""_anf-ts-1"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Semibold"",""identifier"":""_anf-ts-1""},""_anf-ts-10"":{""fontName"":""Georgia"",""identifier"":""_anf-ts-10""},""_anf-ts-14"":{""fontAttributes"":{""style"":""italic""},""fontName"":""Georgia-Italic"",""identifier"":""_anf-ts-14""},""_anf-ts-2"":{""fontName"":""Canela-Light"",""identifier"":""_anf-ts-2""},""_anf-ts-3"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""identifier"":""_anf-ts-3"",""textColor"":""#9b9b9b""},""_anf-ts-4"":{""fontName"":""Chap-Regular"",""identifier"":""_anf-ts-4""},""captionCreditTextStyle"":{""identifier"":""captionCreditTextStyle"",""textColor"":""#9b9b9b""}},""title"":""Powerful Scenes From Today’s #BelieveSurvivors Protests"",""version"":""1.5""}"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029697.txt,"senator Chuck Hagel as defense
secretary, a nomination still in question
after an unsteady performance by the
candidate before the Senate Armed
Services Committee last week that
focused in part on his past criticism of
Israel.

“This trip is a signal that the president
has an interest, not just in the peace issue,
but also in the broader concerns that
Israel is facing,” said Dennis Ross, a
senior Middle East adviser to Obama
during his first term who is at the
Washington Institute for Near East
Policy. “In some ways, it will be the
president traveling to Israel to ask for a
new beginning.”

Article 2.

Foreign Policy

Saeb Erekat - The Peace
Processor

An interview by Aaron David Miller

February 5, 2013 -- Other than Mahmoud
Abbas, Saeb Erekat could be the most
recognizable Palestinian on the planet.
The chief Palestinian negotiator is
certainly among the most passionate in
promoting the cause. And nobody on the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029697
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024609.txt,"Article 4.

The National Interest

Foreign-Policy Failure

Dimitri K. Simes

August 24, 2011 -- PRESIDENT BARACK Obama is in many
respects the opposite of Richard Nixon and George H. W. Bush, both
foreign-policy presidents who subordinated their domestic ambitions
to America’s national-security requirements. Moreover, where
Obama has succeeded internationally, his successes have been largely
tactical rather than strategic, reflecting the fact that he 1s
fundamentally a domestic leader with a European-style socialist
agenda but little or no foreign-policy vision. This lack of an
international agenda is why the president may be called a pragmatist,
but not a realist.

One result of all this is that his administration’s foreign-policy
choices often appear substantially driven by political expediency—
and particularly a desire to avoid domestic criticism, something
apparent in both the president’s surge in Afghanistan and his later
plan for withdrawal. Another is that, lacking a vision, the
administration rarely appears to engage in long-term thinking about
the international environment, historical processes or the potential
unintended consequences of its choices. In fact, its sense of history
seems highly politicized and simplistic.

Short-term political thinking about foreign policy cannot sustain
America’s international leadership, which requires clear distinctions
between immediate tactical problems and longer-term strategic
threats. Today, most analysts agree that the greatest danger to the
United States is not from Iran, which does not yet have nuclear
weapons, or even al-Qaeda, which has been seriously damaged, but
rather from Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. Maintaining the Pakistani

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024609
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030957.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 5/5/2018 10:07:11 AM
To: Steve Bannon
Subject: Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times

Once you know the code it’s all clear

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 1:46 AM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
Good catch and yes

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:09 PM Steve Bannon qq wrote:

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/politics/trump-hush-payment-stormy-
daniels.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030957
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031491.txt,"From: Larry Summers

Sent: 10/10/2016 12:45:19 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:

Importance: — High

Got it.

Now remember

Press is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: Po

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

On Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the hillary

says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims.
disgraceful, but. here we are

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

I laid this out for you over dinner. its

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031491
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017980.txt,"Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald Page 17 of 17
Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 18 of 18

those restrictions across the country. Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of a British press magnate and Jeffrey Epstein’s close
associate when he was inviting underage girls into his bedroom, leads a TED Talk on
environmental issues.

But she points out that there has been no statute of limitations for federal sex crimes involving children since 2002.

Children who are sexually abused often take decades to reveal what happened to them, in part because their brains aren’t wired at a young age to
understand the trauma they’ve experienced, said Kenneth V. Lanning, a retired FBI agent who investigated and studied child sex crimes for 40 years.

“We want to hold children to some superhuman standard because they behave this way. In reality, police, prosecutors and judges have to understand that
children are not all angels from heaven. They are just plain human beings who are emotionally immature so we have to protect them from their own

decisions.”

Wild, who continues to fight her federal case on behalf of all of Epstein’s victims, said she hopes that the federal judge hearing the Crime Victims’ Rights
case will make a ruling soon, one that will send a message to prosecutors who fail to consider the rights of crime victims.

“Really if you think about this too hard, it’s scary because this is our government that is supposed to protect us but has done everything to protect a
pedophile,” she said.

Support investigative journalism

The Miami Herald obtained thousands of FBI and court records, lawsuits, and witness depositions, and went to federal court in New York to access sealed documents in the reporting of ""Perversion of

Justice."" The Herald also tracked down more than 60 women who said they were victims, some of whom had never spoken of the abuse before.

Your digital subscription, starting at $0.99 for the first month, supports investigative journalism like this

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article2 19494920 html 4/3/2019
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017980
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027749.txt,"Time: 05/26/19 02:52:01 PM (580600321)
Flags: 1085445
Ts Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F32E62EB-D4C3-4A5B-81F3-B336759A3C3F

Message: understood. . were there any surprises.? My germans said it was a slap
in the face for macron, but knowing him he probably liked it

Time: 05/26/19 02:52:29 PM (580600349)

Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 5S90ADF7F-F212-47BD-8D2A-BOD

ey

(EF338065

Message: He gambled all-- and lost

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 05/26/19 02:52:43 PM (580600363)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: DB417690-A8F3-4C65-9EC0-488 9 9AARDEO9

Message: On another note I hope Michaels new book doesn't stir up too much trouble.

Time: 05/26/19 02:55:13 PM (580600513)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: DIA81C85-9B19-4A44-940C-OD556EBEE141

Message: Have you read it

Sender: ee

Time: 05/26/19 02:55:24 PM (580600524)
Flags: 1060865

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: D99B7A80-4E21-4A7E-9C26-C34COF3AD75F

Message: He told me it was non event

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
Time: 05/26/19 02:58:08 PM (580600688)

Flags: 1085445

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027749
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020705.txt,"Image source: yuyamika7

#8 Charlie Chaplin

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020705
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015349.txt,"Cartoonist Mary Lawton depicted a character saying, “I just found
out that alfalfa sprouts smell like sperm. Does this mean | should practice
safe salad?” Yet humorist Jacqueline Shtuyote tells me that “Sperm is
basically tasteless. The truth should be out about this. Men seem to think
that their white stuff is a culinary delight, yet | know of no culinary courses
extolling the flavor of sperm. And if, as rumored, Jack-in-the-Box cooks
occasionally spill their cum on an irritating customer’ s hamburger, how
many of us would be pleased with the added ingredient?

“Why can’ t we find something that changes the flavor of cum?
Then men could squirt red stuff that is raspberry flavored, or brown stuff
that is chocolate flavored. Shy women could finally delight in swallowing
their lover’ s cum. No sperm would ever be spit out again. There could be
a pill to make cum taste like fast-food hamburgers. Maybe then we
wouldn’ t mind if we found out that the secret sauce on top of Jack-in-
the-Box hamburgers is, after all, sperm.”

But let’ s not forget those who don’ t eat meat. They face an
ethical dilemma--whether or not it’ s an acceptable practice for a
vegetarian to give a blow job, and if so, is it all right to swallow? The
general practice is that, yes, it’ s definitely okay to give a blow job because

no animal is harmed in the process. And, yes, it’ s also okay to ingest the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015349
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025517.txt,"From: Steve Bannon iii

Sent: 3/11/2018 7:39:40 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’

Importance: — High

Germans get it

Begin forwarded message:

Resent-From: (i

From: ""Thomas D. Williams""
Date: March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1

To: Raheem Kassam < , Oliver Lane
<>, Alexander Marlow <3, Frances Martel
<>, A dricnne Ross (>

Subject: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’

German Media Confess to
Underestimating Steve
Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous
as Ever’

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025517
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017758.txt,"Page 44 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *910

forbid retrial even when a victim has received no notice, *°° and the CVRA itself bars a new trial remedy. *?? Sentencings
would appear to be subject to limitations that might prevent a crime victim from obtaining a resentencing *°° - although the
CVRA directly allows for re-sentencings in certain limited circumstances. 3°!

While neither trial nor sentencing could proceed without proper notice to the victim, this restriction will affect only a small
number of cases for a short period of time. Many federal cases lack a specifically identifiable victim (e.g., drug and
immigration offenses) and thus are not covered by the CVRA. In those cases with a victim, a significant percentage of victims
may waive any right to receive notice. In cases where victims choose to receive notice, presumably the notice will be properly
given the vast majority of the time. Even apart from notice requirements, most victims will be trial witnesses and therefore will
have been notified of the trial by a subpoena. Victims will also often be aware of sentencings through the work of probation
officers in preparing presentence reports. 302 Th the tiny fraction of cases where notice has not been properly provided, notice
will often be only a [*911] telephone call away. While the burdens of delaying a trial or sentencing are not trivial, Congress
has determined that the victim's rights must take precedence. Proposed subsection (b) faithfully implements that determination.

Subsection (c) of the proposed rule deals with the victim's right to attend in situations involving multiple victims. Congress has
recognized that in some cases, such as the Oklahoma City bombing case, it is impossible to afford all victims the opportunity to
attend trials. Accordingly, the CVRA provides that where ""the number of crime victims makes it impracticable"" to protect
rights for all victims, the court ""shall fashion a reasonable procedure"" to give effect to victims' interests. 3° Possible
procedures include closed-circuit transmission of the proceedings to a ceremonial courtroom, auditorium, or other facility that
can accommodate many people. To permit such transmission, an amendment to Rule 53 is proposed below. 3

Subsection (d) gives victims a general right to be heard on issues ""directly affecting"" their rights. The CVRA specifically
mandates that victims have the right to be heard with regard to release of the defendant, a plea, or a sentence. 3°° The right to
be heard at these hearings has been addressed elsewhere in these proposed rules, °° but courts will sometimes consider other
issues that directly affect victims' rights. For example, courts may consider whether to release the address and telephone
number of the victim to the defendant. 3°7 It makes little sense for the court to decide this issue without hearing from the
victim, particularly since the CVRA gives victims the right ""to be reasonably protected from the accused."" 3°8 Subsection (d)

298 See U.S. Const. amend. V. See generally Beloof, The Third Wave of Crime Victims' Rights, supra note 16, at 303-04 (discussing double
jeopardy barriers to remedying violations of victim's rights).

299 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(d)(5).
300 See Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c) (correction of sentence allowed only for technical or other clear error). Whether denial of a victim's right

constitutes ""clear error"" subject to correction presumably will need to be resolved in future cases. Cf. United States v. Bedonie, 413 F.3d 1126
(10th Cir. 2005) (remedying error in restitution award not permitted after imposition of sentence).

301-18 U.S.C.A. 3771(d)(5) (authorizing a victim motion to ""re-open a ... sentence"" if the victim's right to be heard was denied); see 150
Cong. Rec. $10,910 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (discussing this provision). In light of these provisions, the Advisory
Committee may need to consider redrafting Rule 35 to allow reopening of sentences imposed in violation of victims' rights.

302 See supra notes 231-34 and accompanying text (discussing probation officers collecting victim information for presentence reports).

303 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(d)(2).

304 See infra notes 340-42 and accompanying text.

305 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(4) (discussed at supra notes 104, 230 and accompanying text).

306 See supra note 296 and accompanying text (bail hearings); supra note 110 and accompanying text (plea hearings); supra note 275 and
accompanying text (sentencing hearings).

307 See supra notes 175-76 and accompanying text (discussing changes to Rule 12.1).

308 18 U.S.C.A. 3771 (a)(1).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017758
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023645.txt,"the different areas of spending between investment and spending from the private sector, which is a
major incentive for jobs in the coming years. As everyone knows, the aim of Vision 2030 is to reach a 7%

unemployment rate in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. With no doubt, these programs will make us into a
better number than we are today in 2020.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023645
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027991.txt,"any other pursuing vehicle would be in no shape to follow for very long. But we
still had to avoid trouble on our way back out. I knew it would be a risk to go
back to the Coral Beach, so we took the shortest route to the sea, straight out to
the Corniche, the city’s main avenue along the Mediterranean. As we got closer,
we could hear gunfire. Obviously, the police, and the Palestinian militias,
realized something was not right. The advantage we had was that they would
have no idea what had happened on Rue Verdun, who we were, or where we
were going.

No sooner had we joined the Corniche than I saw another police Land Rover
about 200 yards ahead of us. This one had a spotlight on the roof, panning both
sides of the road. I told the driver to slow down. About 100 yards or so later,
reaching the place where we’d arranged for the SEALs to meet us, he and the
other station wagon pulled over to the side of the road. The Land Rover kept
driving. We slid down a steep embankment nearly 30 feet to the sea. Two of the
three assault teams had bags full of documents as well. We swam out to the
dinghies. When we had hoisted ourselves in, we headed out at first by paddle,
then under engine power, to the missile boat. The whole operation had taken
about a half an hour, only 10 minutes on Rue Verdun.

I radioed Manno on the way to the missile boat. A half-dozen words: the
agreed code phrase for “mission accomplished, targets achieved.” I could hear
relief in his voice when he replied. At first, | assumed that was because they
hadn’t heard from us during the operation. Our radio link to the missile boat had
gone down when we entered the built-up area around the apartment blocks.
Genuinely, despite Manno’s suspicion that I’d cut the connection. Yet he had
other reasons to exhale when he heard we had got out safely. Amnon’s team had
had a much tougher time. They met resistance from the moment they arrived at
the DFLP building. Two of his men were killed, another wounded. They set off
their explosive charges, but had to fight their way out. They only barely
managed to escape, carrying their fallen comrades with them and linking up
with another team of SEALs near the Coral Beach.

It was a little before six in the morning when I got home. I was careful not to
wake Nava. I’d changed out of my slacks and flats and surrendered my wig on
the missile boat. But I didn’t have the energy to deal with my makeup. The next
thing I remember was my wife standing by our bed as I stirred awake around
noon the next day. She looked at my eye makeup and lipstick, shook her head,
and smiled. She didn’t need to ask where I’d been. Israel radio had been full of
news about a major operation in Beirut.

143

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027991
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026036.txt,"From: Gino Yu as

Sent: 12/17/2016 2:43:49 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)

Attachments: mime-attachment.png; mime-attachment.gif; mime-attachment.jpg

Importance: — High
See the attached. Let me know if you are interested in meeting him when he’s in NYC.

gino

Begin forwarded message:

From: Paul Schulte <a >

Subject: Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet
ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
Date: 1/7 December 2016 at 8:35:35 AM HKT

To: Gino Yu <a

Sure. Forward

Founder and Editor
Schulte Research

On 17 Dec 2016, at 3:09 AM, Gino Yu {> wrote:

I’m Still in HK. Cancelled my India trip. Leaving for Italy on Monday. Can meet this weekend if you are
around.

Can I forward this to my benefactor in NYC? You interested in meeting him while you are there?

gino

On 16 Dec 2016, at 6:19 PM, Paul Schulte {a > wrote:

Founder and Editor
Schulte Research

Begin forwarded message:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026036
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029867.txt,"nytimes.com / MICHAEL D. SHEAR WASHINGTON — Ina made-

for-television Independence Day production starring America’s military

weaponry, President Trump on Thursday used the Lincoln...

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029867
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032918.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 11/20/2016 1:48:58 AM 
To: Ken Starr 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Ken Starr < > wrote: 
Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board. 
Hope you're well. Best, Ken 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise? 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Ken Starr <_____________________________L> wrote: 
Darn. On a cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election cruise. Bad 
timing on our part. 
We'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there. 
Many thanks. 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , i can organize. anytime with wife your 
call. otherwise new york dec. 6-9? \ 
interesting times. http ://www. dailymail. co .uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-
claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html  
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Ken Starr < > wrote: 
Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you? 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
any new york plans 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032918 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032919 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032920 
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013359.txt,"113. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “How
many minors have vin procured for prostitution?” Jd. at 104.

114. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Have
you ever coerced, induced or enticed any minor to engage in any sexual act with you?” Jd. at
107.

115. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “How
many times have you engaged in fondling underage females?” Jd. at 108.

116. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “How
many times have you engaged in oral sex with females under the age of 18?” Jd. at 110.

| 117. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Do you
have a personal sexual preference for children?” Jd. at 111-12.

118. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Your
Cotmplaint at page 27, paragraph 49, says that ‘RRA and the litigation team took an emotionally
arian set of facts involving alleged innocent, unsuspecting, underage females and a Palm Beach
billionaire, and sought to turn it into a goldmine,’ end of quote. Who is the Palm Beach
billionaire referred to in that sentence?” Jd. at 112-13.

119. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: ““Who are
the people who are authorized to make payment [to your lawyers] on your behalf?” Jd. at 120.

: 120. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “Is there
anything in L.M.’s Complaint that was filed against you in September of 2008 which you

contend to be false?” Id. at 128.

Al

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013359
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019314.txt,"Office:

Istituto Dignitatis Humanae
44 Via delle Fornaci

Roma 00165

ITALY

@ben_harnwell
www.dignitatishumanae.com

Il giorno 22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38, Steve Bannon {qq ha scritto:

What does this say???

Begin forwarded message:

From: Maria Luisa (i
Date: July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT

To: Steve Bannon <>, Preate Alexandra

<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg>

Sent from my iPhone

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019314
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014436.txt,"Chart 3: EM debt and equity have been hit Chart 4: While Banks versus Staples has gone ballistic
950 r 40 0.43
——MSCI EM _
900 SSW eG TRS EN LSI SEE ERG ; , ———S&P 500 Banks relative to Food & Bev
0.39
(RHS)
850 0.37
0.35
800
0.33
750 0.31
700 0.29
0.27
650 0.25
Oo Oo Wo Oo Oo Ob Oo 0 0 Oo 0 Oo 8 po WwW WOW © © © © © © © © © ©
SSReRPERELZERS SSR SR ER SESE ES

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

The moves since Nov 8"" have certainly been violent in certain asset classes. USD/JPY
stands out, but the sell-off in US treasuries has been very marked, the hit to EM fixed
income equally big, while in equity markets the outperformance of the Russell, the surge
in the US banks and the sell-off in long duration equities has been remarkable.

Some of these moves, such as stronger USD, higher yields, banks vs staples were
extensions of moves that had already begun. Others, such as Russell vs S&P, JPY, Nikkei,
were the start of new moves where 8 Nov marked a key turning point.

The moves that had already started are now getting quite stretched with US 10Y yields
up 5 standard deviations from the July low, with US Banks up by a similar amount vs
Staples. The USD/JPY move though is more like a 2 SD move, with the NKY similar (if
we exclude the 7% drop on US election day).

Peak liquidity, deflation, Inequality and globalisation —- watch for Peak Trump

So what does a Trump presidency mean for the world? Michael Hartnett, our Chief
Investment Strategist sums it up nicely with four of his seven peaks. Peak liquidity —
the era of excess liquidity is over; Peak inequality — with fiscal stimulus to address
inequality; Peak globalisation- free movement of trade, labour and capital ending, FX
wars starting; and Peak deflation — the secular low point in bond yields now behind us.
We would add a peak to that which investors need to bear in mind —- Peak Trump. What
we mean by that is at what point do the policy changes of the Trump presidency get
fully discounted in markets. We have moved pretty quickly to do that but we suspect
there is more to go, even if the quick returns have probably already been made.

If we think about these peak questions, the two that stand out to use as obvious and not
really open to challenge are Peak liquidity and Peak deflation. The Fed left its peak
liquidity position behind ages ago, the BO) has moved to yield rather than liquidity
targeting, the BOE may extend its current programme of QE one more time but then is
probably done and even the ECB is talking about tapering, even if they are unlikely to do
it in December. The Peak deflation theme follows on from this with the secular low in
bond yields surely behind us if the central banks are stepping away from flooding the
world with ever more liquidity.

Peak liquidity/deflation means higher yields - inflation expectations adjusting

The question then is how much yields will likely rise from here. Much of course depends
on how quickly inflation picks up. Markets have already moved to price in a significant
pick-up in expected inflation as the two charts below show. To our mind breakeven
inflation rates had been too low for too long, which is one reason we wanted to be
defensive in bond markets. It would seem to us that inflation expectations are now up
with events. US headline CPI at 2.5% is consistent with the Fed modestly overshooting

Bankof America 2 Global Cross Asset Strategy - Year Ahead | 30 November 2016 5
Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014436
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022573.txt,"71

Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American
Development Bank Group, and the World Bank Group
entered into an agreement under which entities debarred
by one MDB will be sanctioned for the same misconduct
by other signatory MDBs.*” This cross-debarment agree-
ment means that ifa company is debarred by one MDB, it

is debarred by all>”

Loss of Export Privileges

Companies and individuals who violate the FCPA
may face consequences under other regulatory regimes,
such as the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), 22 U.S.C.
§ 2751, et seqg., and its implementing regulations, the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22
C.ER. § 120, e¢ seg. AECA and ITAR together provide
for the suspension, revocation, amendment, or denial of an
arms export license ifan applicant has been indicted or con-
victed for violating the FCPA.*” They also set forth certain
factors for the Department of State’s Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls (DDTC)*” to consider when determining
whether to grant, deny, or return without action license
applications for certain types of defense materials. One of
those factors is whether there is reasonable cause to believe
that an applicant for a license has violated (or conspired
to violate) the FCPA; if so, the Department of State “may
disapprove the application.”>” In addition, it is the policy
of the Department of State not to consider applications for
licenses involving any persons who have been convicted of
violating the AECA or convicted of conspiracy to violate
the AECA.*” In an action related to the criminal resolu-
tion of a UK. military products manufacturer, the DDTC
imposed a “policy of denial” for export licenses on three of
the company’s subsidiaries that were involved in violations

of AECA and ITAR.*”

When Is a Compliance Monitor or
Independent Consultant Appropriate?
One of the primary goals of both criminal prosecu-
tions and civil enforcement actions against companies that
violate the FCPA is ensuring that such conduct does not

occur again. As a consequence, enhanced compliance and

reporting requirements may be part of criminal and civil
resolutions of FCPA matters. The amount of enhanced
compliance and kind of reporting required varies according
to the facts and circumstances of individual cases.

In criminal cases, a company’s sentence, or a DPA or
NPA with a company, may require the appointment of an
independent corporate monitor. Whether a monitor is
appropriate depends on the specific facts and circumstances
of the case. In 2008, DOJ issued internal guidance regard-
ing the selection and use of corporate monitors in DPAs
and NPAs with companies. Additional guidance has since
been issued.” A monitor is an independent third party who
assesses and monitors a company’s adherence to the com-
pliance requirements of an agreement that was designed to
reduce the risk of recurrence of the company’s misconduct.
Appointment of a monitor is not appropriate in all circum-
stances, but it may be appropriate, for example, where a com-
pany does not already have an effective internal compliance
program or needs to establish necessary internal controls. In
addition, companies are sometimes allowed to engage in self-
monitoring, typically in cases when the company has made
a voluntary disclosure, has been fully cooperative, and has

demonstrated a genuine commitment to reform.

Factors DOJ and SEC Consider
When Determining Whether a Compliance
Monitor Is Appropriate Include:

= Seriousness of the offense
= Duration of the misconduct

""  Pervasiveness of the misconduct, including
whether the conduct cuts across geographic and/
or product lines

# Nature and size of the company

"" Quality of the company’s compliance program at
the time of the misconduct

# Subsequent remediation efforts

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022573

"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024621.txt,"30

organizations.

At present, there are 10.5 million Palestinians, including around 5
millions refugees, scattered in several Middle Eastern countries and
other Diaspora states.

As for Palestinian Statehood: The UN General Assembly by great
majority has recognized the right of the Palestinian people to self
determination and statehood in more than 40 resolutions.

Most famous of these resolutions were the two issued in October,
1974: 3236 and 3237. The latter recognized the PLO as the legitimate
representative of the Palestinian people and stipulated that it would
be granted the status of Observer in all UN organs and affiliated
organizations and its sponsored conferences.

In December 15, 1988, a month after the declaration of the State of
Palestine by the PLO conference in Algiers, the UN General
Assembly decided in its resolution of December 15, 1988 to
recognize the PLO declaration of the State of Palestine and to
substitute the use of PLO for the name of Palestine in all its organs
and conferences.

UN membership

After the Oslo accords in 1993 and the failure of peace negotiations
which lasted for 18 years, the PLO intends to bring to the UN
General Assembly once again, through the UN Resolution number
377 of 1950, the issue of recognition of the State of Palestine on the
basis of the June, 1967 borders.

Such resolutions, if issued by the UN General Assembly, could have
some legal, political and media ramifications, but, nevertheless, it
will not have any practical impact on the Israeli Government and
some of its allies.

The State of Palestine will still lack a major element of a sovereign
state: That is the ""effective control"" over territory and population.
This can only be achieved when the Israeli occupation is compelled

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024621
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027761.txt,"Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/01/19 11:33:21 AM (581106801)
Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 7B271D35-3C1A-4F4F-9FEC-2F1ADC7DO2EC

Message: I have blocked out new area.s. beards. Genotypes phenotypes. Ties as
bacteria transmitters. - currencies and debt

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027761
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028452.txt,"$20c455136b0"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":144,""width"":978},""filesiz
e"":0,""identifier"":""6d0c9a96-5a31-46e2-a203

£20c455136b0"", ""imageIdentifier""™:""f589f0963b351d47bf2ab6ea96a46d9d2"",""type""™:""image""}, ""Vid
oResourceRef-1"":{""URL"":""https://vp.nyt.com/video/hls/2018/09/24/77825 1 24vid-Trump-

Kavanaugh-

UN _wg/master.m3u8"", ""classification"": ""video"", ""fileSize"":0,""identifier"":""VideoResourceRef
-1"", ""type"": ""video""}, ""abd88058-168e-488a-8b4f-07ce658df3ai"":{""URL"":""asset://abd88058-
168e-488a-8b4f£-
O7ce658df3al"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":422,""width"":750},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""abd88058-168e-488a-8b4f
O7ce658df3al"",""imageldentifier"":""49%ebb5label59233c9F01512bffaa40b"", ""type"": ""image""}, ""b80
77£26-e058-4b81-ae30-b64eba3977E4"": {""URL"": ""asset: //b8077£26-e058-4b81-ae30

be4eba3977e4"", ""classification"": ""font"", ""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"": {""familyName"":""NYTC

heltenham

Medium"", ""style"": ""normal"", ""weight"":700,""width"":""normal""},""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-

Bold"", ""identifier"": ""b8077f£26-e058-4b81-ae30-b64eba3977e4"", ""type"": ""font""}, ""c44beed8-
a5a4-4327-a845-d3b6df6ae33b"": {""URL"":""asset://c44beed8-a5a4-4327-a845
d3bé6édtéae33b"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":169, ""width"":300},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""c44beed8-a5a4-4327-a845

d3b6édté6éae33b"", ""imageIdentifier"":""49ebb5lab6el159233c9f01512bffaa40b"", ""type"":""image""},""c99
08544-092d-4fae-ala4-ebe9c9b144d9"":{""URL"": ""asset: //c9908544-092d-4fae-alad
ebe9c9b144d9"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":110, ""width"":750},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"":""c9908544-092d-4fae-ala4

ebe9c9b144d9"", ""imagelIdentifier"":""f589f0963b351d47bf2abeaI6a46d9d2"", ""type"": ""image""},""f27
ac487-e930-47d2-9786-73c838c14932"": {""URL"":""asset://f£27ac487-e930-47d2-9786
730838¢c14932"",""classification"": ""font"", ""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"": {""familyName"": ""NYTI

mperial

Regular"", ""style"": ""normal"", ""weight"":400, ""width"":""normal""}, ""fontName"": ""NYTImperial-

Regular"", ""identifier"": ""f£27ac487-e930-47d2-9786-73c838c14932"", ""type"": ""font""}, ""fd989419-

Oe0£-422b-ab24-12513a64cc3c"": {""URL"": ""asset: //£d989419-Oe0f-422b-ab24

12513a64cc3c"", ""classification"": ""font"", ""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"": {""familyName"":""NYTC

heltenham

Medium"", ""style"": ""italic"", ""weight"":700,""width"":""normal""},""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenham-

BoldItalic"", ""identifier"": ""£d989419-Oe0f-422b-ab24

12513a64cc3c"", ""type"": ""font""}},""specVersion""™:""1.6"",""subtitle™:"""",""textStyles"":{"" anf-ts-
i"": {""fontName"":""NYTImperial-Regular"", “identifier"":"" anf-ts-1""},""_anf-ts-
45"":{""fontAttributes"": {""weightLabel"":""bolder""}, ""fontName"": ""NYTFranklin-

Bold"", ""identifier"":"" anf-ts-45""}, ""photo-credit"": {""fontName""™:""NYTCheltenhamSH-

Regular"", ""fontSize"":12, ""identifier"": ""photo-credit"", ""textColor™:""#999999""}, ""pub-

dt"": {""fontName"": ""NYTCheltenhamSH-Regular"", ""fontSize"":12, ""identifier"": ""pub-

dt""}, ""related-pub-dt"":{""fontName"": ""NYTFranklin-

Medium"", ""fontSize"":13,""identifier"":""related-pub

dt"", ""textColor™:""#909090""}},""title""™:""Trump Stands by 4€~Fantastica€™ Kavanaugh as He
Seeks G.O.P. Votes"", ""version""™:""1.0""}

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028452
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021433.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021433
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033016.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 8/25/2017 12:11:54 PM

To! Stanley Rosenber<
Subject: Re: | look forward to hearing from you

now?

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Stanley Rosenberg a 0:

I am free today after 8 o'clock a. m. EST until 3 p."")
Sent from my iPhone

On 25 Aug 2017, at 09.49, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

I recall. Let's skype or phone

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:56 AM Stanley Rosenberg 10%:

What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.

Living in Europe, | was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific
community.

You asked me if | would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?

lam 77 and do not travel so well. | have cut back on my plans to travel. | can consider coming to New York,
September has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference
call on Skype.

| will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.
Linda Stone was the person who | met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that | contact you.
best wishes,

Stanley

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM

To: Stanley Rosenberg
Subject: Re: | look forward to hearing from you

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033016
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015361.txt,"jaw and nodding his head in affirmation of a new discovery. “So,” he
observed, “it’ s against the law to get you horny.”

When we were about to leave the room, he stood in the doorway.

“Did you steal anything?” he asked furtively. | took my watch out of my
pocket since | didn't like to wear it on my wrist, and without saying a word
| placed it on the bureau. Lenny laughed one loud staccato “Ha” and
kissed me on the forehead.

We developed a friendship integrated with stand-up comedy. In_ his
act Lenny had broken through traditional stereotypical jokes about
airplane food, nagging wives, Chinese drivers, annoying mothers-in-law.
Instead he weaved his taboo-breaking targets--teachers' low salaries
versus show-business celebs, religious leaders’ hypocrisy, cruel abortion
laws, racial injustice, the double standard between illegal and prescription
drugs--into stream-of-consciousness vignettes.

In each succeeding performance, he would sculpt and re-sculpt his
concept into a theatrical context, experimenting from show to show like a
verbal jazz musician. Audience laughter would sometimes turn into
clapping for the creative process itself. “Please don't applaud,” he’ d

request. “It breaks my rhythm.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015361
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024102.txt,"Sprout Capital IX, L.P. (Healthcare Technology Portfolio)
$ amounts in millions, as of March 31, 2014
Please refer to Endnotes 1,],K,L,M and N in this Appendix.

Gross
Multiple
Total
Value

Realized Unrealized
Value Value

Total
Cost

Vintage

Company Sector Year Portion)

Gross

(Realized Multiple

(Total)

Gross IRR

Realize Partially Realized Investments

Adolor Corporation Therapeutics 29.3

Affymax, Inc. Therapeutics 2001 B72 17.9 - 17.9 0.48
Aspire Medical Healthcare Devices 2004 7A 0.6 - 0.6 0.07
Aspreva Pharmaceuticals Therapeutics 2004 23.2 151.7 - 151.7 6.54
Aureon Biosciences, Inc. Diagnostics & Infrastructure 2001 34.1 0.8 - 0.8 0.02
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Therapeutics 2003 23.1 106.3 - 106.3 4.60
Corixa Corporation. Therapeutics 2003 42.7 31.1 - 31.1 0.73
eHealth, Inc. Convergence 2001 12.1 58.4 - 58.4 4.83
Epicor Medical, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2001 93 41.8 - 41.8 4.49
ePocrates, Inc. Convergence 2000 17.2 53.2 - 53.2 3.10
Focus Technologies, Inc. Diagnostics & Infrastructure 2000 32.3 84.1 - 84.1 2.61
Gryphon Therapeutics Therapeutics 2002 13.3 0.2 - 0.2 0.01
Ilypsa, Inc. (fka Symyx) Therapeutics 2003 15.8 109.4 - 109.4 6.91
ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Therapeutics 2002 42.9 84.6 - 84.6 1.97
Kalypsys Therapeutics 2002 27.4 1.1 - 11 0.05
Lathian Systems, Inc Convergence 2001 7.1 0.0 - 0.0 0.00
Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutics 2001 23.8 11 - 1.1 0.05
NeuroVista Corp. Healthcare Devices 2004 8.8 - - - -
NxStage Medical, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2001 21.6 45.1 - 45.1 2.09
Nyco Holdings ApS Therapeutics 2002 47.0 222.8 2.7 2955 4,74
Pharsight Corporation Convergence 2002 2.8 6.4 - 6.4 2.31
Phylos, Inc. Therapeutics 2000 10.2 - - - -
Progen Pharmalnc. (Cellgate) Therapeutics 2003 21.4 0.4 - 0.4 0.02
Protedyne Corporation Diagnostics & Infrastructure 2001 21.9 3.7 - 3.7 0.17
Radiant Medical, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2000 18.6 0.5 - 0.5 0.02
Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutics 2003 27.2 219.3 - 219.3 8.06
Spiration, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2002 17.4 14.5 - 14.5 0.84
Tolerx, Inc. Therapeutics 2002 11.0 1.5 - 1.5 0.14
Triple Point Healthcare Devices 2004 0.3 0.1 - 0.1 0.28
VascA, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2001 12.8 0.4 - 0.4 0.03
Visiogen, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2001 17.9 90.0 - 90.0 5.04
VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2001 8.0 22.1 - 22.1 2.76
Total Realized or Partially Realized Investments $ 645.0 $ 1,392.4 $ 2.7 $ 1,395.1 2.18
Unrealized Investments

Expression Diagnostics (XDx) Diagnostics & Infrastructure 2004 $ 166 $ 0.0 6$ 3.8 ¢ 3.8 NA
Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. Healthcare Devices 2002 $ 266 $ 0.0 6$ = $ 0.0 NA
Labcyte, Inc. (fka Picoliter) Diagnostics & Infrastructure 2002 $§$ 10.0 $ 2 $ 10.6 $ 10.6 NA
Relypsa, Inc. Therapeutics 2007 § 203 $ 0.0 6$ 504 $ 50.4 NA
Sopherion Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutics 2004 §$ 151 $ - $ 0.0 6$ 0.0 NA
Spinewave Healthcare Devices 2004 § 105 $ * $ 3.7 $ 3.7 NA
Total Unrealized Investments $ 991 $ 0.0 $ 68.4 §$ 68.4 =

0.48
0.07
6.54
0.02
4.60
0.73
4.83
4.49
3.10
2.61
0.01
6.91
1.97
0.04
0.00
0.05

2.09
4.80
2.31

0.02
0.17
0.02
8.06
0.84
0.14
0.28
0.03
5.04
2.76

2.16

0.23
0.00
1.06
2.49
0.00
0.35

0.69

oL13 76
NM
95.4%
NM
37.4%
-13.2%
26.8%
78.7%
10.8%
17.8%
-60.7 %
78.0%
10.8%
229.7 %s
NM
NM
NM
9.4%
33.6%
16.2%
NM
-49.9%
NM
NM
91.0%
-2.4%
-23.0 %
-48.3 %
NM
35.4%
15.4%

16.8%

-19.4%
NM
0.5%

23.9%
NM

-11.9%

-5.0%

91

CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024102
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017770.txt,"Alien Case 1:19-cv-033 Ae"" Botwiters eS stlfeen OTs /Arsterp aye 4 of 4

SEXUAL ASSAULT Show less

https:/Awww.axios.com/alan-dershowitz-jeffrey-epstein-legal-advice-1a13ad59-a718-46c9-981 3-11231604a387.html 3/3

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017770
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018443.txt,"You Love Is Kinky by Dossie Easton and Catherine W. Liszt. I've also heard good things
about the ""Parents of Alternative Sexuality” pamphlet by Dr. Amy Marsh.

If you, like me, are particularly attracted to the idea of needle piercing, there's a great
book called Play Piercing by Deborah Addington.

If you're more interested in getting a feel for common BDSM philosophies and what the
BDSM community is like -- an anthropological perspective, one might say -- then there's
a book by Mark Thompson called Leatherfolk, and a newer one by Staci Newmahr called
Playing at the Edge.

Well-known feminist BDSM theory authors from the generation ahead of me include Pat
Califia and Gayle Rubin, who are both brilliant.

Online

I usually direct total newbies to this BDSM 101 page by Franklin Veaux:
http://www.xeromag.com/fvbdsm.html

As it happens, the same writer has a good Polyamory 101, too: http://www.xeromag.com/
fvpoly.html

There are a lot of websites on BDSM, and they aren't all carefully edited or moderated; so
if you can manage it, then I suggest you try to get hold of one of the above how-to books.
That said... overall, one of the best online BDSM resources is FetLife.com, the kinky
social networking site. Once you have an account, you can join a huge variety of
discussion groups about BDSM. FetLife is not a dating site; it's more like a kinky
Facebook (seriously). I think that there are important problems with how FetLife is
structured. For example, there's no way to search for past topics, which is ridiculous; this
means that the research process for finding discussions is incredibly weird. The BDSM
activist maymay has written intelligently about many issues with FetLife:

http://maybemaimed.com/2011/03/20/fetlife-considered-harmful/
But the fact remains that FetLife is a huge gathering place.

Another good online resource is the amazing sex education site Scarleteen.com.
Scarleteen offers a ton of advice on a ton of sexual topics, and has its own message
boards.

The site KinkAcademy.com has received some good reviews, and features video tutorials
by some people who are pretty well-known in the community. You have to buy a
membership, though.

The BDSM writer Ranai from Germany has labored long and hard to make an amazingly
comprehensive, international, multilingual directory of kink resources. I haven't gone
through it extensively, but every time Ranai comments on my blog she's brilliant, so I'm
sure her directory is brilliant too. Here's the directory: http://ranai.wordpress.com/kink-
resources/

There are so many BDSM blogs that I could never count them all. I want to direct special
attention to Kink Research Overviews, an abandoned but still excellent blog that profiles
the sparse and scattershot research on BDSM: http://kinkresearch.blogspot.com/2009/10/

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018443
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017016.txt,"II.3. Construction of historical n-grams corpora

IJ.3A. Creation of a digital sequence of 1-grams and extraction of n-gram
counts

All input source texts were first converted into UTF-8 encoding before tokenization. Next, the text of each
book was tokenized into a sequence of 1-grams using Google’s internal tokenization libraries (more
details on this approach can be found in Ref. $4). Tokenization is affected by two processes: (i) the
reliability of the underlying OCR, especially vis-a-vis the position of blank spaces; (ii) the specific
tokenizer rules used to convert the post-OCR text into a sequence of 1-grams.

Ordinarily, the tokenizer separates the character stream into words at the white space characters (\n
[newline]; \t [tab]; \r [carriage return]; ““ [space]). There are, however, several exceptional cases:

(1) Column-formatting in books often forces the hyphenation of words across lines. Thus the word
“digitized”, may appear on two lines in a book as ""digi-<newline>ized"". Prior to tokenization, we look for 1-
grams that end with a hyphen ('-') followed by a newline whitespace character. We then concatenate the
hyphen-ending 1-gram to the next 1-gram. In this manner, digi-<newline>tized became “digitized”. This
step takes place prior to any other steps in the tokenization process.

(2) Each of the following characters are always treated as separate words:
! (exclamation-mark)

@ (at)

% (percent)

4 (caret)

* (star)

( (open-round-bracket)
) (close-round-bracket)
[ (open-square-bracket)
] (close-square-bracket)

(
- (hyphen)
= (equals)
(open-curly-bracket)
(close-curly-bracket)

{
}
| (pipe)

\ (backslash)
: (colon)

: (semi-colon)

< (less-than)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017016
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018325.txt,"Cap’n Crunch. An article about Draper in Esquire in 1972 had, for instance, inspired
two teenagers named Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak to start their first company to
build and sell little phreaking boxes. Woz later recalled nervously meeting the Cap’n
one day in California. He was a strange, slightly smelly, and extremely intense
nomadic engineer. “I do it for one reason and one reason only,” the Cap’n huffed to
the writer of that Esquire article, who was a bit baffled why a grown man would find
whistling into phones so appealing. “I'm learning about a system. The phone
company is a System. A computer is a System. Do you understand? If 1 do what I do,
itis only to explore a System. Computers. Systems. That's my bag,” he said. “The
phone company is nothing but a computer.""1°

I'd heard about the Amsterdam conference in the 2600 hacking circles, somewhere
between the debates about circuit boards and which company was best for the
relatively new service of email. The gathering was organized by group of Dutch
computer geeks who published their own magazine, Hack-Tic. I sent an email to the
founders. One of them, a man with the improbably exotic name Rop Gonggrijp, sent
back an irresistible reply. “On August 4"", 5t and 6 we’re organizing a three-day
summer congress for hackers, phone phreaks, programmers, computer haters, data
travelers, electro-wizards, networkers, hardware freaks, techno-anarchists,
communications junkies, cyberpunks, system managers, stupid users, paranoid
androids, Unix gurus, whizz kids, warez dudes, law enforcement officers
(appropriate undercover dress required), guerilla heating engineers and other
assorted bald, long-haired and/or unshaven scum,” the invitation began. Data
travelers? Electro-wizards? Warez dudes? | had to go. “Also included,” the note
continued, “are inspiration, transpiration, a shortage of showers (but a lake to swim
in), good weather (guaranteed by god), campfires and plenty of wide open space
and fresh air.”

In those early days of the Internet, there was only the barest tickle of a commercial
instinct at work. If anything, most of the people at places like 2600 or Hack-Tic were
profoundly anti-commercial. They were hobbyists, as entranced by role-playing
games like Dungeons and Dragons as by their clapped-together, often unreliable
digital machines. It was no accident that firms like Apple had emerged from groups
with names like The Homebrew Computer Club, names that suggested a rooty, self-
defining hippy ethos. Everyone you met in that world fell pretty squarely into one of
those weird-by-weirder categories Rop Gonggrijp had listed in his email. Their
relaxed, nerdish temperament was reflected in the design of the Internet itself -
open, generous, easy to manipulate, emotional at times in debates over protocols,
freedom loving. The net design was, as well, a reaction against the systems that
troubled all of us most. Like AT&T, say, which was closed, stingy, and tough
(therefore enjoyable) to manipulate.

Jon Postel, the American engineering and programming genius who had helped
write some of the essential original protocols of the Internet, summed up this point

130 “The phone company”: Secrets of the Little Blue Box, Ron Rosenbaum, Esquire
Magazine (October 1971)

93

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018325
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025259.txt,"Section 2.A

Equities

2 UBS

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025259
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015407.txt,"my place.” She added, “Please re-blog and spread the word.” And

indeed, it went viral.

Coincidentally, on the same night that Tosh, in his signature
Sarcastic approach to reality, provoked the woman, Sarah Silverman was
performing at Foxwords Casino, and she touched upon the same taboo
subject: “We need more rape jokes. We really do. Needless to say, rape,
the most heinous crime imaginable, seems it’ sacomic’ s dream, though.
It' s because it seems when you do rape jokes, that the material is so
dangerous and edgy, and the truth is, it’ s like the safest area to talk
about in comedy‘ cause who’ s gonna complain about a rape joke? Rape
victims? They don’ t even report rape. They’ re just traditionally not

complainers.”

Ironically, in 7he Aristocrats, a documentary entirely about a classic
joke of the same name, Silverman complained (facetiously) that she was
once raped by show-biz legend Joe Franklin. Also, her rape tips for men
include, ""Carry a rape whistle. If you find that you are about to rape
someone, blow the whistle until someone comes to stop you."" However,
another joke of hers goes like this: “Il was raped by a doctor—which is so

bittersweet for a Jewish girl.”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015407
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027007.txt,"Operations on these representations include reinforcement
learning and classification, perceptual top-down/bottom-up
processing, abstraction, analogy formation, associative and
syllogistic reasoning, planning, reflection, anticipation and
several modes of reorganization.

Creating a scientific community

The Comprehension
Challenge

The task of the Structure of Mental Representation initiative will
at first consist in the creation of a large and competitive
community, built around a set of benchmark problems.

I suggest picking a set of problems that covers most of the
above architectural requirements: the comprehension of
dynamic visual sequences (movies) and narratives. The
evaluation of comprehension may focus both on a discourse
level (asking the system general and specific questions about
the consumed visuals or narratives) and directly, by producing
dynamic renderings and depictions of knowledge represented
within the system. At least on the discourse level, a direct
comparison to the functional properties of child performance
at different cognitive stages is possible.

Turning the benchmark task into a regular competition allows a
direct comparison between models, and offers a strong
incentive for exchange of solutions among research groups. The
need to for broad solutions with given material and intellectual
resources will enforce a higher degree of the reuse of code and
ideas than we currently see in AJ architectures (outside of
robotic soccer, where such competitions have turned out to be
highly successful).

By structuring the comprehension tasks into different levels
and sub-domains (such as basic language acquisition tasks,
grammar, perceptual and logical tasks, social reasoning/theory
of mind, affective evaluation, constructive problem solving, use
of analogies and metaphor etc.), we can formulate consistent
long-term goals and realistic short-term problems.

The Formation of a Pilot Team

To pull the Structure of Mental Representation initiative off the
ground, we will need to create a pilot team, which is the object
of this proposal. The pilot team has the following tasks:

- Bring a critically sized group of people together, with a
well-defined set of shared goals

- Formulate an initial set of hypotheses

- Bring these in the context of an existing or hypothetical
cognitive architecture, so specifications can be derived

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027007
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014719.txt,"2. From a panel discussion last week:

° Woo actually disagrees with some people’s view that there is euphoria in the market. With real yields at -30bp,
the fixed income market is pricing in pessimism on Trump (and as I’ve mentioned, our colleagues in fixed income/FX and
their clients have been quite a bit more bearish than those in equities.)

° Believes there is fear of stagflation in the market, while gold going through the roof on worries of inflation.

e However, if the USS strengthens by 25%, it will be deflationary. Dangerous for EM countries loaded in USS debt,
esp in the wake of boarder adjustment tax reform talk.

e Tax reform is the only thing that matters.

oO US companies have $2-2.5trn of dormant cash sitting on their B/S outside of the US to avoid paying tax.

3) US is the only OECD country without a VAT tax.

3) What needs to happen is: implement a VAT tax that is border adjusted, and fix corporate tax rate. This will not
only boost US economy, but will give a jolt to the world economy as well.

3) Positive that there is a solution, reform momentum on tax is strong regardless of political affiliation. There is a
road out of the quagmire.

3) Question is: why when most other issues are getting leaked out of the White House, information on tax reform

is not being leaked at all? Could it be a sign that the administration believes it is that important, and trying not to mess
up on execution? [Or you could argue that there is nothing to leak at this point!]

3) On timing of tax reform: It is crucial we get a blue print of tax reform in the next 2-3 weeks [now 1-2 weeks],
because Congress would like to raise debt ceiling while discussing tax reform before summer recess.

3) July 29th is start of summer recess, which means need to pass by May, requiring the bill proposal to be ready by
March. Therefore, in the next few weeks, we need to see progress for an August deadline.

3) On personal income tax, Trump and Obama are actually on the same page in terms of taxing the wealthy.

° US banks have $100bn of excess capital in reserve: beyond what they need. Next big growth area for US banks is
commercial banking loans. Growth driver for US economy will be easy access to credit

° Ryan-Brady Tax Blueprint released in 2016 - not many have actually read it, but many of the corporate clients
seem better informed than hedge fund investors on this topic of late.

e Rates: Just two weeks ago, the market was putting a less than 20% chance of a March 15th rate hike, vs now, it
is priced in at an 86% chance. At this point, equities will sell off if no hike.

e Fed will not hike in May ahead of French elections.

3. David Woo’s latest “Cause and Effect” is attached

4. David Woo’s Top Rates and FX Trades for 2017 is also attached. Woo believes that Brexit and the US election

have signaled that the world has changed. These ground shifts have been brought on by a backlash to globalization,
increasingly viewed as the culprit for wage stagnation, growing disparity of income and wealth between the rich and the
poor, and the loss of national identity. For the year ahead, we recommend being bearish 5y US rates (seeing higher
yields), long USDJPY (weaker JPY) and short a basket of EM LatAm long bonds (Mexico, Brazil and Colombia). But in the
near term, we urge caution with the reflation trade. Short 10y US real rates (seeing higher yields) offers the best risk-
reward after recent moves.

Regards,
Amanda

Amanda Ens

Director

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
One Bryant Park, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10036
Phone: ii \Vobilc:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014719
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028334.txt,"1"", ""type""™:""text""}, {""components"": [{""components"": [{""additions"": [{""URL"":""https://itunes.ap
ple.com/us/podcast/today-
explained/idi346207297?mt=2"", ""range"": {""length"":20,""start"":0},""type™:""link""}],""identifie
e"":"" anf-body-21"", ""layout"": ""ctaTitleLayout"", ""role"":""body"",""text"":""The news comes
fast."", ""textStyle"":""ctaTitleTextStyle"", ""type™:""text""}, {""additions""™: [{""URL"":""https://itu
nes.apple.com/us/podcast/today-
explained/id1346207297?mt=2"", ""range"": {""length"":89, ""start"":0},""type™:""link""}],""identifie
e"":"" anf-body-22"",""layout"":""ctaDescriptionLayout"", ""role"": ""body"", ""text"":""Subscribe to
Today, Explained, our daily podcast, to catch up at the end of each
weekday."", ""textstyle"":""ctaDescriptionTextStyle"", ""type"":""text""}],""identifier""™:
container-
4"",""layout"":""ctaInsetLayout"", ""role"":""container"", ""style"": ""ctaStyle"", ""type"": ""container"" } ]
,identifier"":"" anf-container-2"",""layout""™:""ctaLayout"", ""role""™:""container"", ""style"":"" anf-
es-

2"", ""type™:""container""}],""documentStyle""™: {""backgroundColor"":""#ff£""}, ""identifier"": ""https:
//www.vox.com/2018/9/24/17896140/rod-rosenstein-resigns-fired-mueller-trump
russia"",""language"":""en US"", ""layout"": {""columns"":12,""gutter"":30, ""margin"":60,""width"":1024}
,""metadata"":{""canonicalURL"":""https://www.vox.com/2018/9/24/17896140/rod-rosenstein-
resigns-fired-mueller-trump-russia"", ""dateModified"":""2018-09-

24T18:30:02.0004"", ""datePublished""™:""2018-09-

24T18:30:02.0002"", ""thumbnailImagelIdentifier"":""d8f3458eece05b4d2382fd/255aefdefd"", ""transp
arentToolbar"":false}, ""resources"": {""09152098-82c2-4861-bcec5
d17223fbf£717"":{""URL"": ""asset: //09152098-82c2-4861-bec5
d1i7223fbf717"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":933, ""width"":1400},""filesi
ze"":0, ""identifier"": ""09152098-82c2-4861-bec5

d17223fbf717"", ""imageldentifier"":""394ad56afbf68962175acle3cbh8adf99"",""type™:""image""™},""0c0
a6878-5dff-4df9-b7ef-9da9596788cf"": {""URL"":""asset://0c0a6878-Sdff-4df9-bJef
9da9596788ci"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":401, ""width"":800},""fileSiz
e"":0,""identifier"":""0c0a6878-S5dff-4df9-b7ef

9da9596788cri"", ""imageIdentifier"":""00b9f5401lle2c9ca307b1l5e3ee9d63a6"", ""type"": ""image""},""236
a522e-3f£55-4ab5-a23b-65c7 9ece22c4"": {""URL"":""asset://236a522e-3£55-4ab5-a23b
65c79ece22c4"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":1050, ""width"":1400}, ""files
ize"":0, ""identifier"": ""236a522e-3f£55-4ab5-a23b
65c79ece22c4"",""imageIdentifier"":""8096acac060567f5067958Ff6553ald17"", ""type"":""image""},""244
£7 7be-f80e-402a-935d-17aeeacaTfec"": {""URL"":""asset://244f77be-f80e-402a-935d
lvaeeacalTifec"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":563,""width"":750},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""244f7/]be-f80e-402a-935d

lvaeeacalTiec"", ""imageIldentifier"":""8096acacO60567f5067958f6553aldi7"", ""type"": ""image™},""43b
4a98a-c992-409c-a0ec-90d4e4f104ae"": {""URL"": ""asset: //43b4a98a-c992-409c-a0ec
90d4e4f104ae"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":150,""width"":300},""fileSiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""43b4a98a-c992-409c-al0ec

90d4e4f104ae"", ""imageIdentifier"":""00b9f5401lle2c9ca307b1l5e3ee9d63a6"", ""type"": ""image""},""4c7
1£582-eb3a-4262-80fe-d866e27895b3"":{""URL"": ""asset: //4c71£582-eb3a—4262-80f
d866e27895b3"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":177, ""width"":300},""filesiz
e"":0,""identifier""™:""4c71£582-eb3a—4262-80f
d866e27895b3"",""imageIdentifier"":""a6aca5684809e2330274Jeel80cc681b"", ""type"": ""image""}, ""4e5
b635a-c53d-4£22-96dd-9f25c34f35b1"": {""URL"": ""asset://4e5b635a—-c53d-4f£22-96dd
9f25c34f35b1"", ""classification"": ""font"", ""fileSize"":0,""fontAttributes"": {""familyName"": ""Balt
o"", ""style"": ""normal"", ""weight"":600, ""width"": ""normal""}, ""fontName"":""Balto-

Bold"", ""identifier"": ""4e5b635a-c53d-4f22-96dd-9f25c34f35b1"", ""type"": ""font""}, ""4ee582da-
807c-4903-ale7-Sec37eclf1lb6"":{""URL"": ""asset: //4ee582da-807c-4903-ale7

Sec37eclflb6é"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":500, ""width"":750},""fileSiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""4ee582da-807c-4903-ale7

Sec37eclflb6é"", ""imageIdentifier"":""394ad5¢afbf689621J5acle3cbh8adf 99"", ""type"": ""image""™}, ""503
627a3-d454-4660-8fbe-a4512a723a8d"": {""URL"": ""asset: //503627a3-d454-4660-8fb
a4512a723a8d"",""classification"":""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":720,""width"":1080},""filesi
ze"":0, ""identifier""™:""503627a3-d454-4660-8fb
a4512a723a8d"",""imageIdentifier"":""394ad5¢atbfe89621J5acle3ch8adf99"", ""type"":""image""},""5cd
c9908-9140-4c2e-9e94-260d402865c9"": {""URL"":""asset://5cdc9908-9140-4c2e-9e94
260d402865c9"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":225, ""width"":300},""filesiz
e"":0, ""identifier"": ""5cdc9908-9140-4c2e-9e94

260d402865c9"", ""imageldentifier"":""8096acac060567f5067958f6553ald17"", ""type""™:""image""},""7c5
8ef05-91ca-4564-aa71-6569c8dal8d8"":{""URL"":""asset://7c58ef05-91ca-4564-aa7l
6569c8dal8d8"", ""classification"": ""image"", ""dimensions"": {""height"":720,""width"":1080},""fileSi
ze"":0,""identifier""™:""7c58ef05-9lca—-4564-aa7Tl

6569c8dal8d8"", ""imageIdentifier"":""20ldb923dclet64edbc8ec41 9b342dceca"", ""type"": ""image""}, ""87d
ad0d1-634c-4dce-973c-cfff£6d135079"": {""URL"":""asset://87dad0d1-634c-4dce-973¢

W

_anf-

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028334
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021355.txt,"Pa

at
Q

»e | 109

¢

advances have begun to alter the climate and
thereby blurred the boundary between the
human and the natural in another way. See
for examples of this phenomenon, Bill
McKibben, The End of Nature (New York:
Random House, 1989).

""Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and
John Cacioppo, “On Seeing Human: A
Three-Factor Theory of
Anthropomorphism,” Psychological Review
114 (2007): 864-86.

' Sheldon Sacks, ed., On Metaphor
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1978); David Tracy, The Analogical
Imagination: Christian Theology and the
Culture of Pluralism (New Y ork:
Crossroad, 1981).

' Alain Besancon, The Forbidden
Image: An Intellectual History of
Iconoclasm, trans. Jane Marie Todd
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
2000); Joseph Leo Korner, The Reformation
of the Image (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2004).

' Merritt Y. Hughes, “Earth Felt the
Wound,” English Literary History 36
(1969): 193-214.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021355
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014350.txt,"Chart 55: What would get you more interested in investing in GS stock?

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

Astronger revenue Normalizing regulations —_ Investing to drive Additional expense
backdrop and ability to return improving returns reductions
more capital

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research

« Management focused the presentation on Marcus, Goldman’s new consumer
lending effort. This venture has significant potential with an unsecured consumer
loan target market of $850B and Goldman coming to the market with a unique
skillset of technology and risk management, no channel conflicts or bricks and
mortar, a strong balance sheet that can provide loans at a meaningful discount to
peers, and a long history in the financial markets with a strong brand. When fully
ramped up, this unit could produce pre-tax ROA’s of 3-4%, and assuming 9-11%
equity commitments, this could translate into a high teens ROE.

¢ — Given the positive sector/GS stock reaction post the election, management was
asked on what they thought about the future of current regulation and activity
levels. While they said it is too early to tell the impact, a lower corporate tax rate
would benefit GS some, a pro-growth policy could positively impact
confidence/activity levels, and some de-regulation could ease some of the
operational challenges, though much of the regulation was well intended and has
created a stronger industry.

¢ Interms of the current environment, GS didn’t give an exact update, but said
activity has been healthy and around the election activity was similar to around
Brexit (slow before and very active post). Most other firms also mentioned positive
trends in 4Q, with normal seasonality, but up materially year over year.

Asset Managers Top 5 Takeaways

Invesco (IVZ), C-1-7, Buy
Presenting from IVZ was Loren Starr, CFO. Overall Loren was optimistic on the
outlook for IVZ to generate above average organic growth given its product mix and
performance, deliver cost savings, and accelerate buybacks, and does not expect a
significant change in the DOL impact from the election.

« | When asked what would get investors more excited about investing in IVZ stock, the
majority of respondents said that a consistent above average organic growth rate
would get them most excited (48%), followed by a more favorable market backdrop
(38%), less regulation (10%), and more operating leverage (5%), while nobody said
longer term FX hedged would get them more interested.

ea Bankof America
36 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014350
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019472.txt,"Sandringham in 2000. The picture shows just how close she and Epstein were with Prince
Andrew

The girl is said to have been taken there by 18-year-old student Haley Robson, who claims in a sworn

statement that she was recruited at the age of 17 to provide the billionaire with a $200 nude massage.

One of the girls ‘cried hysterically’, according to a police report, as she recalled how she was recruited to

provide services for Epstein when she was 16.

She claims in a sworn statement that he introduced her to a woman whom he said he had brought from

Yugoslavia ‘to be his sex slave’.

Epstein was convicted in 2008 of soliciting sex from a minor - a minor in the US is someone younger than

18 - and served 13 months in prison.

Now, lawyers for four of Epstein's alleged victims are fighting to get a federal non-prosecution agreement
against Epstein thrown out so he can potentially face criminal charges for allegedly sexually abusing the

women, one of whom says she was only 13 at the time of the assault.

Bizarrely, Maxwell was initially served with a subpoena in September 2009, as she was leaving the Clinton

Global Initiatives Conference in New York.

Power people: Ghislaine Maxwell and newspaper billionaire Rupert Murdoch, pictured
together in at the Fifth Important Dinner for Women hosted by Her Majesty Queen Rania
Al Abdullah, Wendi Murdoch and Indra Nooyi in New York in September 2010

Epstein was convicted in 2008 of soliciting sex from a minor - a minor in the US is someone younger than

18 - and served 13 months in prison.

Now, lawyers for four of Epstein's alleged victims are fighting to get a federal non-prosecution agreement
against Epstein thrown out so he can potentially face criminal charges for allegedly sexually abusing the

women, one of whom says she was only 13 at the time of the assault.

As for Maxwell, bizarrely, she was initially served with a subpoena in September 2009, as she was leaving
the Clinton Global Initiatives Conference in New York, and continues to deny all allegations made against

her.

Gossip girls: Ghislaine Maxwell (right) and Gossip Girl actress Kelly Rutherford at an event

to celebrate Anna Netrebko's new album 'Verdi', in New York in September 2013

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019472
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011090.txt,"CHAPTER 8: BANKS, MONEY AND MACROECONOMICS

Splitting up Banks

I started to write a book on banks and money a year ago. I stopped when | realized
that I don’t know enough about the subject. I have some experience and have done
some reading in those fields, but not enough to justify a whole book. A chapter, or

part of a chapter, is more like it.

Sumerian temples doubled as banks, mostly for agricultural loans to finance the next
crop. It is from their records, in clay tablets, that we know they understood

compound interest and the capitalization formula.

Deposit-and-lend banks as we know them today emerged in Venice and other
European cities in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Chapter 1 said that equity
investors cannot be attracted at leverage (deposit/equity) of less than 10:1, that
even one tenth so much leverage is unstable in high winds, and that we rebuild the
banking system after every systemic failure because we blamed the high winds

rather than the rickety structure.

I said that the solution is to split up banks as we know them into deposit banks
which invest in ETFs on the one side, and lending banks which raise funds from
investors rather than depositors on the other. These entities would have separate

stockholders, and would not interact unless incidentally.

A different kind of bank split-up has been urged since the 2008 crash. Repeal of the
Glass-Steagle act had allowed commercial (deposit-and-lend) banks to operate as
investment banks (brokerage firms). Many blamed the crash on that repeal, and on
investment bank innovations such as mortgage-backed securities. I think those
critics are looking in the wrong direction. The problem, as with most bank crashes
over the centuries, was overleverage encouraged by nearly costless deposits. The

solution is not to peel off brokerage operations from the mix, but to peel off deposits.

Chapter 8 Banks, Money and Macroeconomics 2/8/16 1

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011090
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012721.txt,"Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 85-1
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE

June 8, 2011

legislative history because the CVRA ‘is un-
ambiguous.’’ Response of the United States,
In re Antrobus, No. 08-4002, at 12 n.7 (10th Cir.
Feb. 12, 2008).

At the time that the Justice Department
filed this brief, no Court of Appeals agreed
with the Tenth Circuit. At the time, three
other Circuits had all issued unanimous rul-
ings that crime victims were entitled to reg-
ular appellate review. See In re W.R. Huff
Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 562 (2d Cir. 2005);
Kenna v. US. Dist. Ct. for the Cent. Dist. of Ca.,
435 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2006); In re Walsh,
229 Fed.Appx. 58, at 60 (8rd Cir. 2007).

My next question for you is, given that the
Justice Department has an obligation to use
its ‘‘best efforts,’’ 18 U.S.C. §38771(c)(1), to af-
ford crime victims their rights, how could
the Department argue in Antrobus (and later
cases) that the CVRA ‘‘unambiguously”’ de-
nied crime victims regular appellate protec-
tions of their rights when three circuits had
reached the opposite conclusion?

GOVERNMENT'S RIGHT TO ASSERT ERROR
DENIAL OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS

To further bolster protection of crime vic-
tims’ rights, Congress also included an addi-
tional provision in the CVRA—$§3771(d)(4)—
allowing the Justice Department to obtain
review of crime victims’ rights issues in ap-
peals filed by defendants: ‘‘In any appeal in
a criminal case, the Government may assert
as error the district court’s denial of any
crime victim’s right in the proceeding to
which the appeal relates.’ 18 U.S.C.
§3771(d)(4). The intent underlying this provi-
sion was to supplement the crime victims’
appeal provision found in §3771(d)(3) by per-
mitting the Department to also help develop
a body of case law expanding crime victims’
rights in the many defense appeals that are
filed. It was not intended to in any way nar-
row crime victims’ rights to seek relief
under §3771(d)(3). Nor was it intended to bar
crime victims from asserting other remedies.
For instance, it was not intended to block
crime victims from taking an ordinary ap-
peal from an adverse decision affecting their
rights (such as a decision denying restitu-
tion) under 28 U.S.C. §1291. Crime victims
had been allowed to take such appeals in var-
ious circuits even before the passage of the
CVRA. See, e.g., United States v. Kones, 77
F.3d 66 (8rd Cir. 1996) (crime victim allowed
to appeal restitution ruling); United States v.
Perry, 360 F.8d 519 (6th Cir. 2004) (crime vic-
tims allowed to appeal restitution lien
issue); Doe v. United States, 666 F.2d 43, 46 (4th
Cir. 1981) (crime victim allowed to appeal
rape shield ruling).

As I explained at the time the CVRA was
under consideration, this provision supple-
mented those pre-existing decisions by
“allow[ing] the Government to assert a vic-
tim’s right on appeal even when it is the de-
fendant who seeks appeal of his or her con-
viction. This ensures that victims’ rights are
protected throughout the criminal justice
process and that they do not fall by the way-
side during what can often be an extended
appeal that the victim is not a party to.’’ 150
Conc. REC. $4270 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of
Sen. Kyl).

I have heard from crime victims’ advocates
that the Department has not been actively
enforcing this provision. Indeed, these advo-
cates tell me that they are unaware of even
a single case where the Department has used
this supplemental remedy. My final ques-
tion: Is it true that the Department has
never used this provision in even a single
case in the more than six years since the
CVRA was enacted?

Sincerely,
JON KYL,
U.S. Senator.

HONORING OUR ARMED FORCES

SERGEANT VORASACK T. XKAYSANA

Mr. BENNET. Mr. President, it is
with a heavy heart that I rise today to
honor the life and heroic service of
SGT Vorasack T. Xaysana. Sergeant
Xaysana, assigned to the Headquarters
and Headquarters Company, 2nd Bat-
talion, based in Fort Hood, TX, died on
April 10, 2011. Sergeant Xaysana was
serving in support of Operation New
Dawn in Kirkuk, Iraq. He was 30 years
old.

A native of Westminster, CO, Ser-
geant Xaysana enlisted in the Army in
2005. During over 6 years of service, he
distinguished himself through his cour-
age and dedication to duty. Sergeant
Xaysana’s exemplary service quickly
won the recognition of his commanding
officers. He earned, among other deco-
rations, the Iraq Campaign Medal, the
Global War on Terrorism Service
Medal, and the Army Good Conduct
Medal.

Sergeant Xaysana worked on the
front lines of battle, serving in the
most dangerous areas of Iraq. Mark
Twain once said, ‘‘The fear of death fol-
lows from the fear of life. A man who
lives fully is prepared to die at any
time.” Sergeant Xaysana’s service was
in keeping with this sentiment—by
selflessly putting country first, he
lived life to the fullest. He lived with a
sense of the highest honorable purpose.

At substantial personal risk, he
braved the chaos of combat zones
throughout Iraq. Though his fate on
the battlefield was uncertain, he
pushed forward, protecting America’s
citizens, her safety, and the freedoms
we hold dear. For his service and the
lives he touched, Sergeant Xaysana
will forever be remembered as one of
our country’s bravest.

To Sergeant Xaysana’s parents,
Thong Chanh and Manithip, and to his
entire family, I cannot imagine the
sorrow you must be feeling. I hope
that, in time, the pain of your loss will
be eased by your pride in Vorasack’s
service and by your knowledge that his
country will never forget him. We are
humbled by his service and his sac-
rifice.

EST

GRAZING IMPROVEMENT ACT

Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I rise
today to submit for the REcoRD an ar-
ticle written by Karen Budd-Falen and
published May 28, 2011, in the Wyoming
Livestock Journal. The article’s title is
“Leveling the Playing Field: Support
for the Grazing Improvement Act of
2011.”’

The title of the article is instructive.
Anyone living and working in rural
communities knows the playing field is
not level. The National Environmental
Policy Act has become the preferred
tool to delay and litigate grazing per-
mit renewals for American ranchers.

Livestock grazing on public lands has
a strong tradition in Wyoming and all
Western States. Ranchers are proud

Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 4 of 4

S3609

stewards of the land, yet the permit-
ting process to renew their permits is
severely backlogged due to litigation
aimed at eliminating livestock from
public land.

During times of high unemployment
and increasing food prices, we need to
be encouraging jobs in rural economies.
We need to be fostering an environ-
ment to raise more high quality, safe,
American beef and lamb; not litigating
less.

That is why I introduced the Grazing
Improvement Act of 2011. This legisla-
tion will provide the certainty and sta-
bility public grazing permit holders
desperately need in order to continue
supporting rural jobs, providing
healthy food, and maintaining open
spaces for recreation and wildlife.

It is time to help level the playing
field for hard working ranching fami-
lies across the West. Their livelihood
should not be held hostage by litiga-
tion and anti-grazing special interest
groups. I thank my colleagues, Sen-
ators ENZI, CRAPO, HATCH, HELLER,
RIScH, and THUNE, in supporting ranch-
ing families and this legislation.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous con-
sent to have printed in the REcorpD the
article to which I referred.

There being no objection, the mate-
rial was ordered to be printed in the
RECORD, as follows:

[From the Wyoming Livestock Roundup,

May 28, 2011)

LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD: SUPPORT FOR
THE GRAZING IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2011
(By Karen Budd-Falen)

If jobs and the economy are the number
one concern for America, why are rural com-
munities and ranchers under attack by rad-
ical environmental groups and overzealous
federal regulators?

America depends upon the hundreds of
products that livestock provide, yet radical
groups and oppressive regulations make it
almost impossible for ranchers to stay in
business. Opposition to these jobs comes in
the form of litigation by radical environ-
mental groups to eliminate grazing on public
lands, radical environmental group pressure
to force “voluntary” grazing permit buy-
outs from “willing sellers,’’ and holding per-
mittees hostage to the court deference given
to regulatory ‘‘experts.” The playing field is
not level and the rancher is on the losing
side. The Grazing Improvement Act of 2011
will level the playing field. I urge your sup-
port.

The Grazing Improvement Act of 2011 does
the following:

1. Term of Grazing Leases and Permits.
Both BLM and Forest Service term grazing
permits are for a 10-year term. This bill ex-
tends that term to 20 years. This extension
does not affect either the BLM’s or Forest
Service’s ability to make interim manage-
ment decisions based upon resource or other
needs, nor does it impact the preference
right of renewal for term grazing permits or
leases.

2. Renewal, Transfer and Reissuance of
Grazing Leases and Permits. This section
codifies the various ‘‘appropriation riders”
for the BLM and Forest Service requiring
that permits being reissued, renewed or
transferred continue to follow the existing
terms and conditions until the paperwork is
complete. Thus, the rancher is not held hos-
tage to the ability of the agency to get its

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012721
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014344.txt,"With regard to growth in the energy book management expects balances to stay
relatively flattish as new growth is offset by pay downs and deleveraging.

Chart 44: Where do you see TCBI’s provisioning in 2017 relative to 2016?

50% AT%
45%
40%
35%
30%
29%
20%
15%
10%

5%

0%

16%

Lower, given the stabilization  Flat-to-higher, given credit Uncertain, as volatility in oil
in oil prices which should lead normalization in the rest of the prices could lead to an
to reserve reversals book elevated level of provisioning

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research

= Mortgage growth to continue despite a downshift in activity: Management was
optimistic on the outlook for both its mortgage businesses — warehouse lending
and MCA businesses Management expects both these portfolios in aggregate to
total 28-33% of average total loan portfolio. Management tried to debunk the
perception that the MCA business was cannibalizing its warehouse lending business
and noted that two business were complimentary in nature. Moreover, while initially
the vast majority of the MCA customers were the ones that TCBI had a relationship
on the warehouse lending side, it noted that that number had fallen to 50% and is
likely to move lower over the coming quarters. TCBI has a dedicated sales force
prospecting for the MCA business.

= Next rate hike to give a bigger boost to EPS: Management noted its high asset
sensitivity with most of their loans tied to LIBOR and prime and its expectations for
an increase in funding costs to remain relatively tempered. With strong demand
deposit growth during the year and a $1bn reduction in loans with floors (from
$3.1bn to $2bn), TCBI has become more asset sensitive relative to last year, when a
rate hike led to a $4mn increase in spread income. Management expects a Dec rate
hike to boost spread income by more than $4mn a quarter.

= Remains cautious around CRE lending: Management noted that it intends to grow
CRE more slowly as it de-risks the portfolio and until it sees a turn in the cycle.
However, management is optimistic on the credit quality of CRE, particularly noting
that trends in its Houston real estate portfolio (Houston special mention loans are
1% of Houston CRE) continue to be fairly benign.

us Bancorp (USB), B-2-7, Neutral
Strong growth outlook across the business spectrum. CEO Richard Davis
provided an upbeat view around the outlook for the economy across the business
spectrum ranging from small businesses to large corporates and noted that
businesses could drive the economic recovery vs the consumer side.

30 2016 Future of Financials Conference | 17 November 2016 Bankof America 2
Merrill Lynch

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014344
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019466.txt,"to Robert DeNiro. We even applauded Bob putting his handprints in cement in front of Grauman's Chinese
Theater.

The conversations continued about how our government put the cabasch on ""Zero Dark Thirty"" with their
arrogant denial of enhanced interrogation. Even MPAA President Chris Dodd could not help Mark Boal,
Katherine Bigalow and Amy Pascal.

Additional chatter was the renewed last minute love for ""Les Miserables"". Clearly the most polarizing
film in the race, this 27 year old theatrical musical seen by 60 million fans is now the talk of the
Oscar weekend.

Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Russell Crowe, Amanda Segfried, Eddie Redmayne, Sasha Baron Cohen, Helena
Bonham Carter and Samanthe Barks are making an historic one time live performance as part of Sunday's
television broadcast. Producers Craig Zadan and Neil Meron's will attempt to razzel dazzel us with an
homage to movie musicals for three plus hours at the Dolby theater.

Barbra Streisand, Adele and Shirley Basse's appearances also create high anxiety and a blood bath for
tickets...hence the hysteria created by Dreamworks’ messenger cutting the line.

After checking into the iconic Beverly Hills Hotel, my home away from home for 30 years of Oscar weekends
and meticulously laying out all the ensembles sent from Valentino and Ralph Rucci, I hit the party
circuit overdressed for life.

Daisy... I can do this...fairly easily now...but I have a lunch at 12:30pm and important meetings. I am
so distraught about all this pressure. I am calling you now. Peggy

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019466
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018778.txt,"The Site is Visible to Over 42 Million Visitors Per Year

MCCARRAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION

McCarran International Airport is one of the busiest airports in the country. McCarran serves both short and long haul markets, along
with international markets. In 2014, Airports Council International ranked McCarran ninth in North America and 25th in the world for
passenger traffic, with approximately 43 million arriving and departing passengers each year. 2014 observed an increase of over 1 million
more passengers over 2013, or a 2.4% increase in traffic. With over 30 air carriers, McCarran provides nonstop service to domestic and
international destinations including Canada, Germany, Mexico, the United Kingdom and South Korea. 2014 was the highest year on record
for international tourism, with over 3.3 million visitors to the Strip.

Major expansion and improvements totaling $3.5 billion include Terminal 3 that opened in 2012 and the new $100 million control tower was
completed in early 2015. The 1.9 million-square-foot expansion of Terminal 3 increased the airport’s annual capacity to approximately 55
million passengers.

MCCARRAN AIRPORT PASSENGER TRAFFIC

50.0
47.7
i International Passengers
45.0
Mm Domestic Passengers 42.9
41.4 Ans 41.5 417
40.0 39.8

2.20

36.9 36.3
1.22 35.2 35.0
ad LTO =

42.0
:

35.6 34.1 34.0 Soe 40.0 42.4 44.2 45.5 41.8 38.3 37.6 38.9 38.8 39.0 39.5

42.9 MILLION
TOTAL PASSENGERS IN 2014

3.3 MILLION
30.0 INTERNATIONAL PASSENGERS

TOTAL PASSENGERS (MILLIONS)

25.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018778
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012735.txt,"The Raleigh - South Beach

The Raleigh is different from most properties in South Beach, with a Starting

vibe that's more Deco cool than decked out to the nines. A stay here Thursday 4/8 at
feels a bit like a trip to the 1940s - dressed in whites one minute, casual

the next. It's all about lounging in style by the pool, which has hosted 8pm BST
everything from Esther Williams swimming routines to Chanel's cruise =
collection show. The Raleigh itself is a lot like that pool: cool, pretty and
a place to be seen.

Click here to preview sale

The Classic SoCal Beach Escape

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012735
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011084.txt,"water. Next generation theory is not contradicted because it describes cash flows

only. It treats all growth at the collective scale as free and exogenous.

Testing Next Generation Theory

The proxies for the pure consumption rate (Schultz’ pure consumption over total
capital) in security markets would be dividend yield for equities, and interest for
debt claims. Ibbotson Associates’ SBII (2012), Chapter 4, shows average real
interest on U.S. corporate bonds as 3.0% over the period 1926-2011. Real corporate
dividend yield rate over the period can be estimated from the same source at about
2.9%. Jeremy Siegel’s Stocks for the Long Run (2002), Table 1-2, reports data
extending back to 1802. Real return over the period 1802 - 2001 is shown as
averaging 3.5% for long-term governments, and 2.9% for short-term governments.

Corporate bond returns would have run somewhat higher.

Global Financial Data shows stock market information for 95 countries. Data for U.K.,
U.S., Germany, Australia and France begin from 1701, 1801, 1870, 1883 and 1896
respectively. My charts and tables, and my website Free Growth and Other Surprises,

show this information along with evidence for free growth.

The eighteenth century is represented by U.K. alone. U.K. then showed real price
return, dividend yield and total return at 21.4%, 7.9% and 29.3%. Volatility of
dividend yield was exceptional. From 1801 forward, U.K. averages for these flows
were 2.2%, 4.2% and 6.4%. U.S. figures from 1801 forward were 2.9%, 5.3% and
8.3%. Global Financial Data also shows collective flows for Europe and the world
since 1926. Here the figures were 3.3%, 3.9% and 7.3% for Europe, and 3.5%, 3.8%
and 7.3% for the world.

Modeling of the pure consumption rate before the emergence of security markets
could refer to the history of interest rates alone. Interest is rate of return to senior

claims. Rate of return to any claim is realization by investors net of all expense.

Chapter 7 Petty’s Idea 2/3/16 25

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011084
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017002.txt,"from regular verbs (regularity>50%). Six verbs became
regular (upper left quadrant, blue), while two became
wregular (lower right quadrant, red). Inset: the regularity of
“chide” over time. (G) Median regularity of verbs whose past
tense is often signified with a -t suffix instead of —-ed (burn,
smell, spell, spill, dwell, learn, and spoil) in US (black) and
UK (grey) books.

Fig. 3. Cultural turnover is accelerating. (A) We forget:
frequency of 1883 (blue), 1910 (green) and 1950 (red). Inset:
We forget faster. The half-life of the curves (grey dots) is
getting shorter (grey line: moving average). (B) Cultural
adoption occurs faster. Median trajectory for three cohorts of
inventions from three different time periods (1800-1840:
blue, 1840-1880: green, 1880-1920: red). Inset: The
telephone (green, date of invention: green arrow) and radio
(blue, date of invention: blue arrow). (C) Fame of various
personalities born between 1920 and 1930. (D) Frequency of
the 50 most famous people born in 1871 (grey lines; median:
dark gray). Five examples are highlighted. (E) The median
trajectory of the 1865 cohort is characterized by four
parameters: (1) initial “age of celebrity” (34 years old, tick
mark); (ii) doubling time of the subsequent rise to fame (4
years, blue line); (ii1) “age of peak celebrity” (70 years after
birth, tick mark), and (iv) half-life of the post-peak
“forgetting” phase (73 years, red line). Inset: The doubling
time and half-life over time. (F) The median trajectory of the
25 most famous personalities born between 1800 and 1920 in
various careers.

Fig. 4. Culturomics can be used to detect censorship. (A)
Usage frequency of “Marc Chagall” in German (red) as
compared to English (blue). (B) Suppression of Leon Trotsky
(blue), Grigory Zinoviev (green), and Lev Kamenev (red) in
Russian texts, with noteworthy events indicated: Trotsky’s
assassination (blue arrow), Zinoviev and Kamenev executed
(red arrow), the “Great Purge” (red highlight), perestroika
(grey arrow). (C) The 1976 and 1989 Tiananmen Square
incidents both lead to elevated discussion in English texts.
Response to the 1989 incident is largely absent in Chinese
texts (blue), suggesting government censorship. (D) After the
“Hollywood Ten” were blacklisted (red highlight) from
American movie studios, their fame declined (median: wide
grey). None of them were credited in a film until 1960’s
(aptly named) “Exodus.” (E) Writers in various disciplines
were suppressed by the Nazi regime (red highlight). In
contrast, the Nazis themselves (thick red) exhibited a strong
fame peak during the war years. (F) Distribution of
suppression indices for both English (blue) and German (red)
for the period from 1933-1945. Three victims of Nazi
suppression are highlighted at left (red arrows). Inset:
Calculation of the suppression index for “Henri Matisse.”

Fig. 5. Culturomics provides quantitative evidence for
scholars in many fields. (A) Historical Epidemiology:
“imfluenza” is shown in blue; the Russian, Spanish, and Asian
flu epidemics are highlighted. (B) History of the Civil War.
(C) Comparative History. (D) Gender studies. (E and F)
History of Science. (G) Historical Gastronomy. (H) History
of Religion: “God.”

Sciencexpress / www.sciencexpress.org / 16 December 2010 / Page 7 / 10.1126/science.1199644

Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on December 16, 2010

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017002
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018331.txt,"“Weird Machine”: Computers or sensors or network webs silently made to do what
is not intended. Made weird. Hacking is, after all, a kind of perverse programming. It
involves slipping inside a target machine, and then driving it to do things it wasn’t
intended to do, by giving it instructions its designers never knew it might receive.13¢
The process of developing and using computer bugs, Bratus found, is not unlike the
most sophisticated software research. Hacker follow careful patterns. The best of
them really conceive of whole systems in the way the finest data architects might.
They look for particular designs, weaponize their code with a delicate elegance and
aim relentlessly at total control. A normal machine does what you tell it. A weird
machine does what someone else commands it to do.

How is such a system born? Well, a potential software hole of the sort that produces
a “Weird Machine” might be as simple as a failure to secure computer code after it is
compiled - sort of like not locking the door on your house after you leave - ora
programming oversight that means a machine can’t handle unexpected inputs. Take
the technique of “fuzzing”, for example, a famously effective way to turn a normal
machine into a weird one. The process involves confusing a digital security system
by throwing unexpected data into normal, apparently safe-looking procedures like
logging into a mail system or transferring money by wire. Think of all the
“username” and “password” forms you see when you're on the Internet. In a fuzzing
attack, instead of placing a legitimate user name or email address in a registration
field, hackers might add some unexpected characters known to cause a system to
cough up a confused response. If you type in, joe@user.com!” instead of
joe@user.com as the machine expects, the /’ at the end of the address can baffle and
stall a mis-programmed device. In some cases, that hiccup opens a vulnerability. A
proficient programmer can then order the dazed computer, for instance, to opena
door to the root of the system. It’s as if you could walk up to the teller at your local
bank and shout “Xhsuhgnnsh!!” at her when she asks how you are doing - and in her
confusion she lets you into the safe. You’ve made a weird machine of your bank.

System designers in later generations have become much more sophisticated in
trying to avoid such problems, not least because they’ve so often fingered the
embarrassing or costly aftermath of these kinds of holes in their own code. “You do
not understand how your program really works until it has been exploited,” Bratus
has said, a sentiment that hints at the stomach-lurching moment many coders and
their suddenly victimized users have now had.1%7 You don’t understand yourself until
you've been pwned. The odds that the endless possible glitches can ever be
completely patched is honestly zero. Hackers continue to use classic exploits like

136 It involves: Julian Bangert, Bratus et al. p2 “The Page-Fault Weird Machine:
Lessons in Instruction-less Computing”, Presented as part of the 7th USENIX
Workshop on Offensive Technologies, (Washington, D.C., 2013) available on
www.usenix.org

137 “You do not really understand”: Rebecca Shapiro, Sergey Bratus, Sean W.
Smith, “Weird Machines’ in ELF: A Spotlight on the Underappreciated Metadata”
paper delivered 7th USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies, (Washington, D.C.,
2013) available on www.usenix.org

99

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018331
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015413.txt,"Although Daniel Tosh is a consistently unapologetic performer for
the sardonic material he exudes on his Comedy Central series--which
features a running theme of rape jokes, even including one about his sister--
for this occasion he decided to go the Twitter route: “All the out of
context misquotes aside, I’ d like to sincerely apologize.” He also
tweeted, “The point | was making before | was heckled is there are awful
things in the world but you can still make jokes about them.”

According to Jamie Masada, owner of the Laugh Factory, Tosh asked
the audience, “What you guys wanna talk about?” Someone called out

“Rape,” and a woman in the audience started screaming, “No, rape is
painful, don’ t talk about it.”. Then, says Masada, “Daniel came in, and
he said, ‘Well, it sounds like she’ s been raped by five
guys’ —something like that. | didn’ t hear properly. It was a comment—it
wasn’ t a joke at the expense of this girl.” Masada claims that she sat
through the rest of Tosh’ s performance, which received a standing
ovation, before she complained to the manager.

Fellow comedians defended Tosh with their own tweets. Dane Cook:

“If you journey through this life easily offended by other peoples words |

think it’ s best for everyone if you just kill yourself.” Doug Stanhope:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015413
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027013.txt,"My answer is: Do not take this for granted.

Look at Syria — you don't need classified
intelligence; it’s on your screens. Assad’s jet
fighters, tanks and artillery are slaughtering his
own citizens. Over 70,000 Syrians killed.

Yet still... there is no sense of direction and no
political will to act.

There is an extremely relevant lesson here...
especially for all of us in Israel.

And an insight...

Many believe that the root cause for all the
problems in the Middle East... is our inability to
solve the conflict with the Palestinians.

Well, | say... That’s not true!

Recent developments in the Middle East have
been far beyond our control... and
independent of our deeds.

Even if a peace agreement with the Palestinians
had been signed and sealed a long time ago:

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027013
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021341.txt,"actually exists, or may not see it at all.
This is true of the relative difficulty that
people have seeing other minds
compared to one’s own, in ways that are
sometimes very subtle and surprising.
For instance, we tend to evaluate
ourselves by consulting our mindful
intentions, but we evaluate others (and
their intentions) by observing their
actions. We may consider ourselves to
be conscientious if we planned to buy
our spouse a birthday gift, but need to
see an actual gift to infer that our spouse
is equally conscientious. * We tend to
believe that we are more likely to
experience complicated mental emotions
like shame, guilt, or embarrassment than
are others.” We tend to believe that our
own behavior will therefore be guided
by moral sentiments like empathy, guilt,
or compassion whereas others’ behavior
is more likely driven by the relatively
mindless motives of self-interest.° Other
minds are more opaque than our own,
and some learning, attending, seeking,
and projecting is required for our brains
to become fully social and see into them.
Here’s how’.

Learning. Children do not enter
the world able to think about other
minds, but they learn to do so fairly
quickly. At around three months of age,
children start preferentially attending to
animate objects compared to inanimate
objects, and at around six months of age
start to distinguish between intentional
(goal-directed) and unintentional
(accidental) action. At this age, for
instance, children will look reliably
longer at a person who is reaching for a
cup than to a person who is making the
same reaching motion in the absence of
acup. Over the next 18 months,
children become more likely to mimic
intentional than unintentional actions’, to
follow the gaze of another person and

Page |95

therefore share his or her attentional
focus, and recognize that other people
may have preferences that differ from
one’s own. By age two, children’s
social ability to read other minds seems
to have already surpassed that of our
nearest primate relatives, and over the
next two years they pick up what appear
to be uniquely human mind-reading
capacities. By age five, children
demonstrate the most sophisticated of
mind-reading abilities—the capacity to
recognize that others’ beliefsS may differ
from one’s own and to use those
differing (sometimes mistaken) beliefs to
predict the other agent’s behavior.
Variability from age five onward comes
from learning more specific details about
how other minds actually work, largely
gathered from personal experience,
religious practice, or broader cultural
norms.

Many psychologists and
neuroscientists speculate that learning to
read other minds comes from the deeply
social tendency, present at birth, to
mimic others’ actions. For example,
Steve Small examines a neurological
underpinning for mimicry, and Jean
Decety argues in his essay that an inborn
capacity for mimicry underlies the
human capacity for empathy. Looking
where others look and copying their
actions is a reasonable way to copy their
likely mental states as well. This
egocentric method of using one’s own
mental experience as a guide to other
minds continues to be employed
throughout adulthood, and can give
insight into others’ mental states but can
also lead people to overestimate the
extent to which others’ minds are similar
to one’s own. These biases tend to be
called egocentric when reasoning about
other people, and they tend to be called
anthropomorphic when reasoning about

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021341
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028320.txt,"THE HOUSE OF THE NOBLEMAN
CURATED BY WOLFE VON LENKIEWICZ & VICTORIA GOLEMBIOVSKAYA

PRESS CLIPPING (INTERNET)

Cadogan Tate Sponsors ‘New Sensations’ Art Exhibition
Posted on 10/17/10 at 6:00am by webmaster

Cadogan Tate, the world class art moving, storage and shipping specialist in contemporary art, has sponsored the
‘New Sensations 2010' exhibition for UK art students. Organised by Channel 4 and The Saatchi Gallery, this
prestigious event aims to discover the most imaginative and talented artists graduating from BA and MA courses
in the UK and to support students leaving art college.

(PRWEB) October 17, 2010

Cadogan Tate, the world class art moving, storage and shipping specialist in contemporary art, has sponsored the
‘New Sensations 2010’ exhibition for UK art students. Organised by Channel 4 and The Saatchi Gallery, this
prestigious event aims to discover the most imaginative and talented artists graduating from BA and MA courses
in the UK and to support students leaving art college.

A total of 20 students were shortlisted to present their work in the exhibition. This is being held at Boswall
House, 2 Cornwall Terrace - a magnificent 18th century building off Regent's Park - from 14th to 20th October.
The event forms part of ‘The House of the Nobleman’, under the curatorship of Wolfe von Lenkiewicz and Victoria
Golembiovskaya.

Four of the finalists in New Sensations 2010 - Pablo Wendel, Katie Surridge, Nika Neelova and Ula Wiznerowicz -
have each been given a bursary to develop a new work for the exhibition. A short film about each of them was
aired on Channel 4 in early October.

Stephen Glynn, Cadogan Tate's Fine Art Director, comments: “We are delighted to be the sponsors of this
important exhibition, which showcases the talent of some remarkable young artists. We have spent many years
transporting and storing the world's most precious contemporary art for leading museums, galleries and
collectors. It therefore seemed very appropriate that we should support and encourage the UK's leading art

students through this exciting event.”

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2010/10/prweb4659384.htm

40

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028320
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022567.txt,"Assume the following additional facts:

Under its company policy for a government transaction of this size, Company A requires both finance and compliance
approval. The finance officer is concerned that the discounts to Distributor are significantly larger than what they have
approved for similar work and will cut too deeply into Company A's profit margin. The finance officer is also skeptical about
including Local Partner to perform some of the same services that Company A is paying Distributor to perform. Unsatisfied
with Sales Executive's explanation, she requests a meeting with Distributor and Principal 1. At the meeting, Distributor
and Principal 1 offer vague and inconsistent justifications for the payments and fail to provide any supporting analysis, and
Principal 1 seems to have no real expertise in the industry. During a coffee break, Distributor comments to Sales Executive
that the finance officer is naive about “how business is done in my country.” Following the meeting, Sales Executive
dismisses the finance officer's concerns, assuring her that the proposed transaction structure is reasonable and legitimate.
Sales Executive also reminds the finance officer that “the deal is key to their growth in the industry.”

The compliance officer focuses his due diligence on vetting Distributor and Local Partner and hires a business investigative
firm to conduct a background check. Distributor appears reputable, capable, and financially stable and is willing to take on
real risk in the project, financial and otherwise. However, the compliance officer learns that Distributor has established an
off-shore bank account for the transaction. The compliance officer further learns that Local Partner’s business was organized
two years ago and appears financially stable but has no expertise in the industry and has established an off-shore shell
company and bank account to conduct this transaction. The background check also reveals that Principal 1 is a former college
roommate of a senior official of the Ministry of Immigration. The Sales Executive dismisses the compliance officer’s concerns,
commenting that what Local Partner does with its payments “isn’t our problem.” Sales Executive also strongly objects to the
compliance officer’s request to meet with Principal 1 to discuss the off-shore company and account, assuring him that it was
done for legitimate tax purposes and complaining that if Company A continues to “harass” Local Partner and Distributor, they
would partner with Company A's chief competitor. The compliance officer and the finance officer discuss their concerns with
each other but ultimately sign off on the deal even though their questions had not been answered. Their decision is motivated
in large part by their conversation with Sales Executive, who told them that this was the region's most important contract
and that the detailed FCPA questionnaires and robust anti-corruption representations in the contracts placed the burden on
Distributor and Local Partner to act ethically.

Company A goes forward with the Distributor and Local Partner agreements and wins the contract after six months. The
finance officer approves Company A’s payments to Local Partner via the offshore account, even though Local Partner's invoices
did not contain supporting detail or documentation of any services provided. Company A recorded the payments as legitimate
operational expenses on its books and records. Sales Executive received a large year-end bonus due to the award of the contract.

In fact, Local Partner and Distributor used part of the payments and discount margin, respectively, to funnel bribe payments
to several Ministry of Immigration officials, including Principal 1’s former college roommate, in exchange for awarding the
contract to Company A. Thousands of dollars are also wired to the personal offshore bank account of Sales Executive.

How would DOJ and SEC evaluate the potential FCPA liability of Company A and its employees?

This is not the case of a single “rogue employee” circumventing an otherwise robust compliance program. Although
Company A's finance and compliance officers had the correct instincts to scrutinize the structure and economics of the
transaction and the role of the third parties, their due diligence was incomplete. When the initial inquiry identified significant
red flags, they approved the transaction despite knowing that their concerns were unanswered or the answers they received
raised additional concerns and red flags. Relying on due diligence questionnaires and anti-corruption representations is
insufficient, particularly when the risks are readily apparent. Nor can Company A or its employees shield themselves from
liability because it was Distributor and Local Partner—rather than Company A directly—that made the payments.

The facts suggest that Sales Executive had actual knowledge of or was willfully blind to the consultant's payment of
the bribes. He also personally profited from the scheme (both from the kickback and from the bonus he received from the
company) and intentionally discouraged the finance and compliance officers from learning the full story. Sales Executive is
therefore subject to liability under the anti-bribery, books and records, and internal controls provisions of the FCPA, and
others may be as well. Company A may also be liable for violations of the anti-bribery, books and records, and internal
controls provisions of the FCPA given the number and significance of red flags that established a high probability of bribery
and the role of employees and agents acting on the company’s behalf.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022567
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024635.txt,"Cannabis Investment Report | December 28, 2017

Foreword

Ackrell Capital is pleased to present our 2018 Cannabis Investment Report. Much has happened in the
nearly two years since we published our inaugural report: the cannabis industry grew significantly, com-
panies in the industry raised large amounts of capital and their stock prices performed well, and the legal-
ization movement continued worldwide as more countries and U.S. states implemented a framework for
legal cannabis access. There was also a presidential election in the United States; its ultimate impact on
the cannabis industry remains uncertain. What did not happen since we launched our inaugural report?
Federal legalization: “marijuana” continues to be classified as a Schedule I controlled substance under the

Controlled Substances Act in the United States.

In this new edition, we introduce an outlook on global cannabis markets, analyze capital markets for
cannabis companies and present updated market estimates. We also expand on the first edition by providing
more in-depth analyses of the various market segments within—and analyzing the legal issues pertinent
to—the cannabis industry. The Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies list has been updated and our industry
landscape, The Green Field, has been updated and expanded to include more than 500 companies.

Cannabis legalization has accelerated domestically and internationally. In the 2016 U.S. elections, four
states, including California, legalized recreational cannabis (bringing the total number of states with recre-
ational laws to eight) and an additional four states legalized medical cannabis. Cannabis use is now state-

legal in some form in 46 states.

In January 2018, California will implement its recreational law, making it the largest market globally
for the recreational use of cannabis. Similarly, Canada is expected to pass its recreational law in mid-2018.

And in 2017, Germany became the most populous country in the world to pass a medical cannabis law.

Cannabis has mass consumer appeal around the world. (According to the United Nations, more than
180 million people per year use cannabis and it is the most-consumed drug worldwide). While it is clear
that there is significant demand for cannabis, less clear is how quickly illegal markets will transition to
legal markets, as well as the extent to which legalization may increase overall demand.

We continue to believe that it is a question of when—not if—the U.S. federal prohibition on cannabis
will end. We believe that a path toward federal legalization exists and we believe this process has com-
menced. According to Gallup, 64% of Americans today believe that cannabis use should be legal.

Who is the cannabis consumer? It is the 80-year-old cancer patient ingesting cannabis to treat side
effects of chemotherapy. It is the 12-year-old child using cannabis extracts on a doctor's recommendation
to reduce epileptic seizures. It is the 30-something mother or father seeking to relax after a full day. It is
a group of 20-year-olds on a Friday night heading to a concert. It is the millions of people suffering from
anxiety and depression. It is the millions of people treating chronic pain and nausea. It is the millions of
people using cannabis recreationally.

Our team has met with more than 1,000 companies in the cannabis industry. We understand the oppor-

tunities and challenges facing the industry, and we are happy to provide our insights.
Sincerely,

The Ackrell Capital Cannabis Team

© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024635
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027775.txt,"Time: 06/13/19 04:52:19 PM (582162739)
Flags: 1126401

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 22C2DB58-5277-4B31-977A-4F29FEBC6278

Message: I'm done at the reception. Can I come already 8:10 - traffic is collaborative

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/13/19 04:52:32 PM (582162752)
Flags: 1085445

Is Read: No

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 6C7ACDOE-388B-4506-8F20-D6643560AFAB

T,

Message: of course

Time: 06/13/19 04:53:19 PM (582162799)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: F544CD4B-34AC-4793-A466-E2 9CO40C2E86

Gl

Message: Thx. I'm told it is impolite to come earlier than agreed :-)

Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/13/19 04:54:02 PM (582162842)
Flags: 1093637

Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 25DFD022-BB5A-4A94-B7CE-6F9A10718AC1
Message: must have been the tale of a bore
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com

Time: 06/13/19 05:06:19 PM (582163579)
Flags: 1093637
Is Read: Yes

Is Invitation: No

GUID: 8C7FBO65-A3A4-40A1-8E8C-D45782EA1 6B9

Message: You can even come as early as breakfast anytime

Time: 06/13/19 05:06:42 PM (582163602)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027775
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021427.txt,"What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that | get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come
up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. | am particularly proud of the way | attempt to make all
people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what | am about, which is to
acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As | understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take
selfies at the CFl conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, | am proud of the
interactions | have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff of all genders and ethnicities. | have worked hard
to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. | treat others as responsible adults, and | expect to be treated equally.

Lawrence M. Krauss

Director, The Origins Project at ASU

Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative

Foundation Professor

School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404

Origins Office

origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/Ikrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu

<DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A50EC.png>

On Dec 10, 2017, at 9:53 PM, Lawrence Krauss I wrote:

First draft:

It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part.
Needless to say, | treat people | interact with with respect, and | work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members
of the general public. | do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and
other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high
public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and
allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that | have remained a professor
in all Universities with which | have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like
CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. | was asked to be an honorary
director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees
universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is
to impugn my integrity or suggest | have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts’, as a
scientist | try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. | also try and judge the facts
in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is
because they value my contributions and my actions.

Your specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually
decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. |
cannot comment on item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim, because | know nothing about it, and it was not taken
seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because | decided | didn’t want to go out
to a bar with a group of attendees that | was harassing them? The second part is false. | don’t do that. Re incident 5: The ‘female
companion’ in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what | wrote in response to the blog in
question, causing it to be taken down.

It is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,

Re item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me
with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation | DID tell her she was different than the other students in her

year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so | told her
that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as | recall, | did ask her on one of these
occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. | asked, because as a faculty member | was interested, and also because as
someone she had asked for career advice from | wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. | have
gone back over emails from that period. | have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which | usually had to turn down
because | was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and | politely
declined. | did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. |
did and do have coffee and meals with students on campus, and | see nothing wrong with this. | was shocked when | later learned of
her complaint, not least because there was no inappropriate interaction and also because well after the date on which she is said to
have been offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments, and at a AAAS conference in 2008, for which she
had asked, and for which | had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and | gave her a lift well out out of our way to
drop her off at her hotel, and | note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, | expressed that | would

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021427
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028446.txt,"{""componen

tLayouts""™: {""ComponentLayout-

1"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""start"":0},""contentInset"": {""bottom"": false, ""left"":true, ""ri

ght"":true, ""top"": false}, ""identifi
DocumentMargin"": ""both"", ""margin"": {""bot
:{""column
:{""bottom"":""20.0pt"",""

i"", ""ignore
Layout-10""
10"", ""margin

12"":{""columnRange""™:

We

12"",
tLayout-2""
2"",""ignore
tLayout-3""
3"",""ignore
tLayou

:{""length"":8,""start"":0},""identifier"":"" defaultComponen

ignoreDocumentMargin"":""both"",
:{""column
DocumentMargin""
:{""column
DocumentMargin""
t-4"":{""column
4"",""margin"": {""botto

W

i

Range"": {""length"":7,

{""length"":8, ""start""

Range"": {""length"":8,
i""nene”, W
i {""Léngeth™ 28,
:""nene”, W
:{""length"":8,

Range""

Range""

""start"":0
top""™:""0.0p

""margin"":
""start""™:0
margin"": {""bot
""Stare"" £0
margin"": {""bot
""star

UC"" hy
:0}, ""iden
{""bo

1 VF

},

},

wt,

:""ComponentLayout-—
tom"":""25.0p

1 1
al ,

+ 1
ba f

""top™:""14.0p

1 1
bo f

""top""™:""28.0p

+ 1
— ,

""top™:""20.0p

tLayout""}, ""blockquo

t""}},""Co

tifier"":""ComponentLayout-—

t™}},""Co

tifier"":""ComponentLayout-—

tN} },""Co

tifier"":""ComponentLayout-—
m"":""24.0pt"", ""top"":""0.0pt""}},"" defaultComponentLayout"":

{""column

Len

body"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":6,""start"":1},""contentInset"": {""bottom""™: true, ""left"":
right"":true, ""top"": true}, ""identifier"": ""blockquote-

body"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""0.0pt"", ""top™:""0.0pt""}},""bloc
container"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":7,""start"":0},""contentiInse
rue, ""rYight"" rtrue, ""top"" :true}, ""identifier"": ""blockquote

kquote-

1

container"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""28.0pt"", ""top""™:""0.0pt""}}, ""bottom-banner-
body"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":8, ""start"":0},""iden

body"", ""margin"": {""bo

ttom""™:""30.0pt"", ""top™:""0.0pt""}, ""minimumHeig

banner-head"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":8,""start"":0
head"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""none"", ""margin"": {""bo

lt-author™: {""column

aut

body"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":7, ""star

body"", ""margin"": {""bo
tion"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""s
tion"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""0.0pt"", ""top"": ""2.0pt""}}, ""default-

tart""™:0},™""identifier""™:""d

cap
cap

gallery"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""s

gallery"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""10
tion"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""s
tion"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin""
title™:{""column
title"", ""margin""
image"": {""column

sec
sec

. Opt"", W

:""both""
Range"": {""length""
:{""bottom™:""0.0p

wt,

tifier""™: ""bottom-banner-—

}, ""identifier""
ttom"":""13.0pt""

ae ,

}}, ""default-

O}, ""iden

}, ""default-

ttom"":""24.0pt"", ""top""™:""0.0pt""}}, ""default-
tare’ ?0},""Ldenta fier” ""da

top"": ""0.0pt""}}, ""default-
tart""™:0},""identifier""™:""d

tifier"":""default
fault
fault
fault

:8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""default

tc"", ""top""™:""10.0pt""}}, ""fullbleed-—
Range"": {""length"":8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""fullbleed-

""top™:""0.0pt""}}, ""Component
}, ""identifier"": ""ComponentLayout-
""ComponentLayout-—

tifier"":""ComponentLayout-
ttom"":""0.0p
""iden
tom™ 2""15. 0
""iden
tom"":""28.0p
0}, ""iden

mponen
mponen
mponen

Range""

true,”

:{""bottom""™:true, ""left""™:t

ht""™:""38.0pt""}, ""bottom-
:""bottom-banner-
""top™:""16.0pt""}}, ""defau
Range"": {""length"":7,""start"":0},""identifier"":""default
hor"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""24.0pt"", ""top"":""8.0pt""

image"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""both"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""10.0pt"", ""top""™:""2.0pt""}}, ""headi
ngl"":{""columnRange""™:{""length"":7, ""start "":0}, ""identifier"": ""heading1"", ""ignoreDocumentMargi
n"":""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""15.0pt"", ""top"":""0.0pt""}},""heading3"": {""columnRange"": {""lengt
h"":8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""heading3"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom
""s""15.0pt"", ""top"": ""0.0pt""}}, ""heading4"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":7,""start"":0}, ""identifier
"":""heading4"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"":""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""15.0pt"", ""top™:""10.0pt""™} }
,""image-container"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""image-
container"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""bot
nset""™:{""columnRange"":{""length"":7,""star

e"":{""length"":8,""start"":0},""iden

tifier""

""}},""related-coverag

heading"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":7,""s

heading"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""16
link"": {""columnRange"": {""length"":
link"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""20.0p
caption"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":7,

. Opt"", iW
6, ""star

1
— £
W

W

s

wt,

Lit,

caption"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""2.0pt"", ""top"": ""2.0pt""}},""small-
image"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":7,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""small-

image"", ""margin"": {""bottom""™:""10.0pt"", ""top"":""0.0pt""}},""video"":{""columnRange"":{""length"":8,

tart"":0},""identifier"":""related-coverag
top"": ""0.0pt""}},""related-

0}, ""identifier"":""related
""top™:""0.0pt""}},""small-
tart"":0},""identifier""™:""small-

h"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""28.0pt"", ""top"": ""0.0pt™}}, ""1
O}, ""identifier"": ""inset""}, ""kicker"": {""columnRang
:""kicker"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""0.0pt"", ""top"":""8.0pt

W

start"":0},""identifier"":""video"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin""™: ""both"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""0.0pt""
,""top™:""0.0pt""}}, ""video-
headline"": {""columnRange"":{""length"":8,""start"":0}, ""identifier"": ""video-
headline"", ""ignoreDocumentMargin"": ""none"", ""margin"": {""bottom"":""0.0pt"", ""top™:""10.0pt""™}}},""c
omponentStyles"":{"" anf-cs-1"":{""backgroundColor"":""#F7F7F7"",""identifier"":"" anf-cs-
1""3,"" anf-cs-2"":{""backgroundColor"":""#F8C344"",""identifier"":"" anf-cs-2""},""_anf-cs-

3"": {""£il1"":{""£illMode"":""£it"", ""horizontalAlignmen

t"":""center"", ""imageIdentifier"":""f589f096

3b351d47bf2abea9b6a4eod9d2"", ""type"": ""image"", ""verticalAlignment"":""center""},""identifier"":"" a

nf-cs-

3™},""blockquote""™: {""border""™: {""left"":{""color""™:""#

E2

EZ

E2"", ""style""™:""solid"", ""width"":""1.0pt""}}

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028446
"
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015375.txt,"and Hardy,” he mused. “A miniature Laurel and Hardy, one on each
shoulder. Your little Oliver Hardy bawls you out--he says, ‘Well, this is a
fine mess you've gotten us into.’ And your little Stan Laurel gets all
weepy-—--Oh, Ollie, | couldn't help it. I'm sorry, | did the best | could.’ ”

Later, when Groucho started chuckling to himself, | hesitated to
interrupt his reverie, but | had to ask, “What struck you funny?”

“| was thinking about this movie, Skidoo,"" he said. “Il mean some
of it is just plain ridiculous. This hippie inmate puts a letter he got, which is
soaked in LSD, into the water supply of the prison, and suddenly
everybody gets completely reformed. There's a prisoner who says, ‘Oh,
gosh, now | don't have to be a rapist any more!’ But it's also
sophisticated in its own way. | like how Jackie Gleason, the character he
plays, accepts the fact that he's not the biological father of his daughter.”

“Oh, really? That sounds like the ultimate ego loss.”

“But I'm really getting a big kick out of playing somebody named
God like a dirty old man. You wanna know why?”

“Typecasting?”

“No, no--it's because--do you realize that irreverence and
reverence are the same thing?’

“Always?”

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015375
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033002.txt,"return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and

destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033002
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024116.txt,"UNTIED ARAB EMIRATES

By receiving this Memorandum, the person or entity to whom it has been issued understands, acknowledges and
agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the interests in the Fund have been approved, disapproved or passed on in
any way by the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”), the UAE Securities and Commodities Authority
(the “SCA”) or any other authority in the UAE, nor has the entity conducting the placement in the UAE received
authorization or licensing from the Central Bank of the UAE, the SCA or any other authority in the UAE to market or
sell interests in the Fund within the UAE. The SCA accepts no liability in relation to the Fund and is not making any
recommendation with respect to an investment in the Fund. No services relating to the interests in the Fund
including the receipt of applications and/or the allotment or redemption of such interests have been or will be
rendered within the UAE by the Fund. Nothing contained in this Memorandum is intended to constitute UAE
investment, legal, tax, accounting or other professional advice. This Memorandum is for the information of
prospective investors only and nothing in this Memorandum is intended to endorse or recommend a particular
course of action. Prospective investors should consult with an appropriate professional for specific advice rendered
on the basis of their situation. No offer or invitation to subscribe for interests or sale of interests in the Fund has been
or will be rendered in, or to any persons in, or from, the Dubai International Finance Centre.

UNITED KINGDOM

In the United Kingdom, this Memorandum is being distributed only to and is directed only at (i) persons who have
professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the “Order”), (ii) high-net-worth entities falling
within Article 49(2) of the Order, and (iii) any other persons to whom it may otherwise lawfully be communicated
(all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). Persons who are not relevant persons must not
act on or rely on this Memorandum or any of its contents. Any investment or investment activity to which this
Memorandum relates is available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons.
Recipients must not distribute, publish, reproduce, or disclose this Memorandum, in whole or in part, to any other
person.

105 CONTROL NUMBER 257 - CONFIDENTIAL

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024116
"
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020739.txt,"#19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020739
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017764.txt,"Page 50 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *920

decision to schedule, reschedule, or continue criminal cases should include victim mput through the victim's assertion of the
right to be free from unreasonable delay."" 73°

[*921] The proposed rule also requires that the court state its reason for granting any continuance. This requirement stems
from a recommendation from the President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, which noted ""the inherent human tendency to
postpone matters, often for insufficient reason,"" and accordingly recommended that ""reasons for any granted continuance ... be

clearly stated on the record."" 337 Several states have adopted similar provisions. 73%

Rule 51 - Claiming Error Regarding Victims’ Rights

The Proposal:

The procedures for a victim to assert error should be spelled out in the rules as follows:
Rule 51. Preserving Claimed Error

(a) Exceptions Unnecessary. Exceptions to rulings or orders of the court are unnecessary.

(b) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party or a victim may preserve a claim of error by informing the court - when the court
ruling or order is made or sought - of the action the party wishes the court to take, or the party's objection to the court's action
and the grounds for that objection. If a party or a victim does not have an opportunity to object to a ruling or order, the absence
of an objection does not later prejudice that party. A ruling or order that admits or excludes evidence is governed by Federal
Rule of Evidence 103.

The Rationale:

The CVRA authorizes victim appeals and includes procedures for expedited handling of those appeals. 33° The proposed rule
would [*922] incorporate victims into the existing rule regarding preservation of errors.

Rule 53 - Closed-Circuit Transmission of Proceedings for Victims

The Proposal:

Closed-circuit transmission of court proceedings for victims should be authorized as follows:
Rule 53. Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited

(a) General Rule. Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs
in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.

334 18 U.S.C. 3161-3174.

335 United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 334 n.14 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (recognizing victim's ""participatory right"" with respect to delays
in a criminal case).

336 150 Cong. Rec. $10,911 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (emphasis added).
337 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, Final Report 76 (1982).
338 See, e.g., Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. 13-4435(B) (2001) (courts required to ""state on the record the reason for [any] continuance""); Utah Code

Ann. 77-38-7(3)(b) (2004) (court required to ""enter in the record the specific reason for the continuance and the procedures that have been
taken to avoid further delays"").

339 See 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(d)(3) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005).

DAVID SCHOEN

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017764
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023679.txt,"BiBICI

BBC World News

Xi Jinping and the New Politburo Standing Committee

Robert Lawrence Kuhn
October 25, 2017

HOST: We're going to put a question to Robert Lawrence
Kuhn, who’s a long-time advisor to the Chinese
government. Robert, great to see you again. You were
with us at the very beginning of the Party Congress and
you were at the Congress today when it finished. Did you
have any vision, any inkling that President Xi Jinping
would take on so much authority? Also, what about the
fact that there is no successor candidates among the new
leaders?

RLK: I was interviewed in early 2012 by a well-known
American television network and the question put to me,
in January of that year, was, “isn’t Xi Jinping going to be a
very weak leader because he was not appointed by Deng
Xiaoping and he has no strong base of support?”

TESL

A

SOLAR POWER ARRIVES IN PUERTO AI

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023679
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018457.txt,"Why had I worried? I knew my parents had striven to give me an independent, rational,
feminist outlook. Self-esteem and integrity. I was so lucky, I understood as my father said
nothing but, ""All right.” It was a blinding realization: my father might have judged me
with all the worst things I thought of myself -- but instead, he trusted me to do my best.

When I called my mother (long separated from my dad), too many of my flatmates were
around for a private conversation indoors. I banished myself into a warm summer storm,
cradling my cell phone away from the rain. There was a pause after I said the fateful
words -- then she said, ""Have you talked to your father about this?”

""Yes,"" I said hesitantly. ""Why?""
""Well, I think it was an issue in our marriage that I was more into that stuff than he was.""

Fat droplets soaked my hair. The tight knot in my chest -- familiar for nearly a year --
loosened as I caught my breath. I turned my face up to the sky and let the tilted world
resettle around me; my mother's faraway voice helped me through a hundred things that
had torn my heart. ""You aren't giving up your liberation,"" she reminded me, and
emphasized my continuing right to a partner who respects me. She even noted mildly that
she'd ""wondered"" about me when I was a child.

I'd feared that I was damaged, that there was something deeply broken in me. I'd wildly
guessed that I'd suffered trauma and repressed the memories. But if my mother -- one of
the most independent, feminist women I've ever met -- could reconcile BDSM, then I
knew I could. And if she was into BDSM herself, then rather than viewing my
proclivities as damage, I could see them as something intrinsic we shared.

Over the next hour, my mother told me I could retain rationality, self-esteem and
integrity. For the first time, I found myself believing it.

My therapist laughed when I told him. ""I swear,"" he cried, ""it's genetic!""

te Kk ok

There was one loose end to a conclusion that felt like a fairy tale. Though we had some
unfettered conversations, tension remained between me and Richard -- perhaps it even
worsened. At one point, observing us, Andrew said mildly: ""Settle down, you two.""

Worse, Andrew and I were going in different directions. I finally felt somewhat at peace
with BDSM, but he couldn't gain that comfort, and started backing away from it. It was
impossible not to think of Richard and shiver, remembering how uncompromisingly
vicious he could be. When Andrew and I broke up over a year later, I knew: J shouldn't
see Richard. My therapist warned me to be careful with BDSM when my heart was in
pieces.

Of course I wasn't.

It was the first time I'd explicitly pursued Richard since he'd told me, so long ago, that he
was busy. I emailed him straightforwardly, sat down on his bed shortly after Andrew and
I broke up. When Richard set his fingernails into my skin, he murmured, ""It's been a
while,” as if he'd always known he'd see me here again. The tears came more quickly
than they once had -- I'd fought them then, unwilling to break down in front of him. I'd

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018457
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026022.txt,"destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026022
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029873.txt,"cnn.com / Priscilla Alvarez, CNN (CNN) — Acting Department of
Homeland Secretary Kevin McAleenan has ordered an immediate

investigation into offensive posts ""that allegedly includes...

House Democrats sue for Trump's tax
returns

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029873
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019300.txt,"WE Talks

Women Empowerment: Women to Women Talks
Our mission is to support and enhance women’s professional and personal growth

and fulfillment.

We are deeply committed to providing achievement-driven women with inspiration,
guidance, and elevating networking opportunities networking.

We organize and conduct seminars with female speakers who are leaders in their
industry.

Our seminal approach can me likened to “TED Talks for Women.” The speaker
shares the secrets of her professional and personal success with the audience and
answers the questions. The discussions will include, but won't be limited to the

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019300
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014422.txt,"Disclosures

Important Discl

osures

BofA Merrill Lynch Research Personnel (including the analyst(s) responsible for this report) receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall profitability of Bank of America
Corporation, including profits derived from investment banking. The analyst(s) responsible for this report may also receive compensation based upon, among other factors, the overall
profitability of the Bank’s sales and trading businesses relating to the class of securities or financial instruments for which such analyst is responsible.

Other Important Disclosures

Prices are indicative and for information purposes only. Except as otherwise stated in the report, for the purpose of any recommendation in relation to: (i) an equity security, the price
referenced is the publicly traded price of the security as of close of business on the day prior to the date of the report or, if the report is published during intraday trading, the price referenced is
indicative of the traded price as of the date and time of the report; or (ii) a debt security (including equity preferred and CDS), prices are indicative as of the date and time of the report and are

from various sources including Bank of America Merrill Lynch trading desks.
The date and time of completion of the production of any recommendation in this report shall be the date and time of dissemination of this report as recorded in the report timestamp.

Individuals identified as economists do not function as research analysts under U.S. law and reports prepared by them are not research reports under applicable U.S. rules and regulations.
Macroeconomic analysis is considered investment research for purposes of distribution in the U.K. under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority.

BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research policies relating to conflicts of interest are described at http://go.bofa.com/coi.

""BofA Merrill Lynch"" includes Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (""MLPF&S’) and its affiliates. Investors should contact their BofA Merrill Lynch representative or
Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management financial advisor if they have questions concerning this report. ""BofA Merrill Lynch” and ""Merrill Lynch"" are each global brands for BofA
Merrill Lynch Global Research.
Information relating to Non-US affiliates of BofA Merrill Lynch and Distribution of Affiliate Research Reports:

LPF&S distributes, or may in
South Africa (
PRA}; Merrill Lynch (Aus
Pacific) Limited, regulate
Singapore (MAS); Merrill
CV, Casa de Bolsa, regulated by
japan}: Merrill Lynch Japan Sec
Financial Supervisory Service;

regulated by the Securities and
srael Limited, regulated by Isra
DIFC): Merrill Lynch Inte
Comisi6n Nacional del M
errill Lynch Kingdom o
This research report:
FCA and the PRA) by
retail clients (as defin
imited regulation by the FA a
Lynch (Japan), a registered secu
by HKSFC (research repor'

ralia):

Lynch

Saud

LI(UK}a

India}; and is issued and distri
Bank Limited (Merchant Bank)
regulated by MAS. Bank o
License 235132 (MLEA) distrib
any of its affiliates involved in
Authority. No approval is requi
DIFC) is authorized and regula

This researc!
responsibili

h report has been
y for research repo

d by th

rnationa
lercado

nas Deen a

ed in the ru

5 containing any in
intended for issuance or distribu
bu

preparing this
red for publica
ited by the DFSA. Research
rules. Bank of America Merrill Lynch Internati
prepared and issued by M

he Comisién Nacio'
u
Exc
e

hange Board of

(DIFC Branch), re
De Valores; Merrill
iAra
p
nd Bank of America
es of the FCA and
PRA - details abo
ies dealer u

nd
ri

jon
ed in Singa
LIBLMB) an

pore t

(
ute this repor

iono

rts of its non-US af

security discussed in the report should cdo so throu

respect of any matters relating
report shou
research report.

to dealing in securi

General Investment Related Disclosures:
Taiwan Readers: Neither the information nor any o|

other financial instrument or any derivative related
personal investment advice and it does not take in

that statements regarding futu

deposits or other obligations o
among others, market risk, cou
instruments may be difficult to

lose their entire principal inves

any insured deposi
nterparty default ris
value or sell and re

he future distribute, researc
Pty) Ltd., regulated by The Financial Service Bo

e Hong Kong Securities and
rities Co, Ltd, regulated by
errill Lynch (Taiwan): Merrill
| Securities Authori

bia Company, regulated by the Capita
proved for publica

nder the Financial Instruments and Excl
forma
0, or Use by, any person in Hong Kong}; is issued and distrib
d Merrill Lyn
in Australi

research re

onal Limite

nal Banca
he Financial

India; PT
y; Merrill Lynch (Russia): O00
gulated by the Dubai
Lynch (Brazil): Bank o

| Market Au
ion and is distributed in the Uni

errill Lynch Interna
the PRA) by Merrill Lynch Interna
ut the extent of our regulation by

jon in relation to, or advice on, fu

oins

a
rdistri

d
iliates
ghM

h reports of the following non-US a
ard; MLI (UK}: Merrill Lynch Internati

errill
Financial Services Authority (DI
America Merrill
hori
ed K
ional Limited, which are authorized
tional Bank Limited, London Branch, wl
PRA are available from us
hange Act in

I Lyne
ment
(Argentina):
> Merri
ated b

errill Lynch
Lynch Securi

Lynch Banco

y.

ingdom (UK)

he FCA and

Lynch (Seou

erril
y the Securities and
ies,

FSA);
ultip

0 pro

h (Singapore): Merril
ndustry Regulatory Organization of Canada;
Lynch Argenti
): Merrill Lynch International Incorporated
Futures Bureau; DSP Merrill Lynch (India): DS
ndonesia, regulated by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (O
loscow, regula
errill Lynch (Spain): Merrill Lynch Capital

lo S.A, regulated by Comissdo de Valores Mobilidrios; Merri

essional clien

na SA, regulated

illates in the US (short name: legal name, regulator): Merrill Lynch (Sou
onal, regulated by the Financial Conduct Au
errill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited, regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commissio
Futures Commission (HKSFQ; Merri
Canada): Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, regulated by the Inves
ria y de Valores; Merrill Lynch
Services Agency:
Lynch Securities (Taiwan) Ltd, regu

errill Lynch (Indonesia): PT

hority (FCA) and the Prudential Regula
n; Merrill Lynch (Hong Kong): Merri
Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd, regulated by the

errill Lynch (Mexico): Merrill Lyne
by Comisién Nacional de Va

Seoul Bi

ed by the Centra

hich is authorized

ures contracts are not intended for issuance or distribu

uted

ion

pinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or aso
this report may be used or reproduced or quoted in any manner whatsoever in Taiwan by t
This research report provides general information only. Neither the information nor any op

o account the specific investment o
financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in financial instruments and

License 412901

5 local dis

rt} distribu

he US. Any

1Go

n-US affiliates.

in Taiwan by Merrill

utional investors and/or accredited investors (each as defined under the Financia
ch (Singapore) (Company Registra
America N.A., Australian Branch (ARBN 064 874 531), AFS
only to ‘Wholesale’ clients as defined by s./6
port is an Authorised Deposit-Taking Institution un
bution of this report in Brazil and i
reports prepared and issued by Merrill Lynch
, Frankfurt Branch (BAMLI Frankfu
PF&S and/or one or more of its no!
distributed to MLPF&S clients in t

os F 06872E and 198602

BANA Australia) and

ribu

ingapore) Pte Ltd in

im

me
a

ha

der the Banking Act 19
jon is by Merrill Lynch

(DIFC are done so in accord
es this report in Germany ai
LPF&S is the distribu
US person receiving this research re
LPF&S and not such foreign affiliates. Hong Kong recipients of this research report should contact Merri
ies (and not futures contracts) or provision of speci
d contact Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited (Merchant Bank} and/or Merrill Lynch (S

ic advice on securities (and

Lynch (Taiwan); is
A
883D respectively
errill Lynch Equi

ance with

respec

icitation of an offer to transact in any securities or o
he press or any other person without the express written consent of BofA Merrill Lynch.
inion expressed constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or
to such securities or instruments (e.g, options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences}. This report is not intended to provide

bjectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific
plementing investment strategies discussed or recommended in
re prospects may not be realized. Any decision to purchase or subscribe for securities in any offering must be based solely on existing public information on such
security or the information in the prospectus or other offering document issued in connec
Securities and other financial instruments discussed in this report, or recommended, o
tory institution (including, Bank of A
k and liquidity risk. No security, financ!
iable information about the value or
income from such securities and other financial instruments, if any, may fluctuate and
ment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to fu

ion with such offering, and not on this report.
fered or sold by Merrill Lynch, are not insured by the Federal Deposi
rica, N.A.). Investments in general and, derivatives, in particular, in
instrument or derivative is suitable for all investors. In some cases, securities and other financial
risks related to the security or financial instrument may be difficult
price or value of such securities and instruments may rise or fal
ure performance. Levels and basis for taxation may change.

s and eligible counterparties
by the PRA and regulated by the FCA and the PRA, and is distributed in tl
ral Bank of Ireland and
on request; has been considered and distributed in
apan; Is issued and distributed in Hong Kong by Merril

nd is regulated by BaFin.
or of this research report in
port and wishing toe

not futures contracts}. Singa
of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this

Bank of the
arkets E

as each

by the Cen

jon in Hong Kong ai
issued and distribu
dvisers Regulations
}. MLIBLMB and Mei
ies (Australia} Limi

the Corporations Act 2001. With the exception of BA
59 nor regulated by the Austra
Brazil} in accordance with ap

p
he requirements o

K); Merrill Lyne
Russian Federation;

Lynch (Hong Kong) which is

h

lonetary Au
ores; Merri
ranch) regulated by
P Merrill Lyne
h (Israel):
erri
regu

spana, S.ASV,,
I Lynch

is defined in tl

subje

he
hLi

he rules of
he U
ct to

apan

nd are not directed
ed in India by

) by Merrill Lynch

In

A Australia, neit
ian Prudential Regu
icable regulations.

he DFSA conduct 0

by
regu
0, or
DSP Merri
ema
rrill Lynch (Singapore) are
ed (ABN 65 006 276 795), AFS
her MLI

atio
erri
f bu

e US and accepts fu

person. Investors should seek
this report and should understand

h Africa): Merrill Lynch
jon Authority
| Lynch (Asia
hority of

h Mexico, SA de

I Lyne

h

mited,

errill Lynch
I Lyne
ated
KSA Com

h

by
pany,

he
K to

errill
ated

I Lynch
jonal

EA nor
A

I Lynch
siness

fect any transaction in any
| Lynch (Asia Pacific) Limited in
pore recipients of this research

her financial instrument. No part of

Insurance Corporation and are not
volve numerous risks, including,

‘0 obtain. Investors should note that
and, in some cases, investors may

Bankof America
Merrill Lynch

Japan Economics Viewpoint | 18 November 2016

13

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014422
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026519.txt,"From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Attachments: 
Laurie Cameron 
9/3/2013 3:17:44 AM 
Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sept 2 position 
Sept 2.nmbtemplate 
Importance: High 
Hi Jeffrey, 
Attached please find the Sept 2 position. The realized gain 
increased by the $28 k option premium that resulted from the 
barrier level trading in USD JPY. The USD sold off vs the AUD, 
GBP and the NZD today. The USD rallied against the CAD and the 
JPY. 
I have separated y t d p/lfrom Sept p/1 so that the numbers mean 
more. 
Hopefully the AUD will stay above .88 going into next Monday. As 
I write this it is approx .9o, which is good. I know it's not BRL, but 
I think that we are realizing some good gains. In the weeks ahead 
volatility will likely increase as Congress considers standing behind 
Obama and attacking Syria. Liquidity in restricted currencies can 
disappear at the trader's will. I prefer that we trade liquid easily 
currencies at a time like this. 
Laurie 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026519 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030311.txt,"From: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 2/26/2010 6:37:49 PM
To: Robert D. Critton Jr. i: Jessica Cadwell
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- | apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM

Subject: Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as
undeliverable

To: ""Alan M. Dershowitz"" <>, Martin Weinberg <>

From: <]
Date: Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:58 AM
Subject: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable

To: jeevacation@gmail.com

To

From: Michael Reiter/PalmBeach

Date: 07/10/2008 02:36PM

Subject: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable

Margie,

"" As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer"" Hmmmmm. I have to be
direct -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer
and activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on
Saturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were
the only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the
Palm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic.

Thanks,

Mike

Palm Beach Post Editorial
Monday, July 07, 2008

Two years after a grand jury indicted him on a felony charge of solicitation of prostitution, Jeffrey Epstein
finally admitted that he lured a teenage girl to his $8.5 million, 13,000-square-foot Palm Beach mansion for
sex. A week ago, the 55-year-old investment banker began serving 18 months in jail.

But that plea deal - guilty of felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a person under the age of 18 for
prostitution - does not account for all five of the girls, one as young as 14, who alleged that Epstein sexually
abused them. And why is Epstein serving his term in the overcrowded Palm Beach County Jail and not a state
prison, where inmates are sent if their sentences are longer than one year?

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_03031 1
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011709.txt,"The President responded by suggesting we go to the Pentagon and talk in
greater detail about how, for both our countries’ benefit, that could be avoided.
When we convened in Secretary Cheney’s office, I delivered the same message,
but more forcefully. I felt it was essential not only to make it clear we serious
about taking action, but that we had the military capability to do so. So I told
Secretary Cheney and Colin what we were planning. I said we intended to
launch a combined air and ground assault by an air-mobile force and our best
paratroop units. At that point, Colin, who was clearly worried, suggested the
two of us withdraw to speak “soldier to soldier.” We retreated to his office.
Spreading out a map of western Iraq, I went into greater detail, explaining how
we would remain in the Iraqi desert on a search-and-destroy mission against the
mobile launchers. Colin stressed the efforts the Americans were making from
the air, and the commitment they’d shown to Israel. Not only had they delivered
the Patriots. They had allocated their best fighter jets, F-15E’s, to the task of
taking out the Scuds. It helped that he and I had got to know and respect each
other, so it wasn’t an all-out argument. But I reiterated that if the Scud attacks
kept up, we would have to act. “We will act,” I said. For a few seconds, he said
nothing. But as we headed back to join the others, he told me that only a few
hours ago, he had briefed American commanders on an anti-Scud operation by
“allied forces” like the one we were planning. “It will happen,” he assured me.
“Within 48 hours.”

That task fell to Britain’s SAS. The operation was almost exactly the same as
the one we’d planned. A force of nearly 700 commandos was helicoptered in to
Iraq’s western desert, equipped with Jeeps and Land Rovers, and anti-tank
missiles and laser targeting capability. They were also able to call on attack
helicopters and F-15 jets if necessary. The operation did not prove easy, quick,
or entirely successful. The British troops blocked the main roads and patrolled
them. But they did not find or destroy a single mobile launcher. They ended up
in gun battles with Iraqi troops. The SAS lost something like two dozen men.
Five were part of a group that got separated from the others and ended up
freezing to death in the February cold. All of the men risked their lives, with
incredible determination and bravery, in an operation to secure the safety of
Israel’s civilian population. And I have no doubt that the outcome, like the plan,
would have been almost identical if we had done it ourselves.

And it did have an effect. As I’d told Prime Minister Shamir when briefing
him on our attack plan, the very fact of a military presence on the ground made
a dramatic difference. The number, accuracy and impact of the Scuds dropped
off steeply. A few missiles kept coming, however. Since we did not yet have a

238
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011709
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029898.txt,"From: Lawrence H. Summers

Sent: 1/8/2015 1:26:40 AM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: idea for jefferey e.

Not terrible idea.

Sent from my iPhone

Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at ee

Follow me on twitter @lhsummers
www.larrysummers.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kelly Friendly <j >

Date: January 7, 2015 at 5:01:26 PM PST
To: “Lawrence H. Summers""
Subject: idea for jefferey e.

Perhaps you should suggest Jefferey talk to Joe Lockhart at the Glover Park Group. He has helped Clinton and General
Petraeus.

Joe is great and he likes you a lot. LMK if you want to reach out to him. He is an old friend....

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029898
"
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024806.txt,"A

>
LA

RELL
ITAL Cannabis Investment Report | December 2017

Cannabinoid a class of chemical compounds present in cannabis that act on cannabinoid receptors in
cells in the human nervous and immune systems

Cannabinol (CBN) a cannabinoid derived from THC degradation; shown to produce some psycho-
active effects and believed to have several medicinal benefits, including analgesic, antibacterial,
anticonvulsive, anti-inflammatory and anti-insomnia

Cannabis a genus of flowering plant consumed for therapeutic, medicinal, social or spiritual purposes
and used to produce goods such as rope, paper, clothing and soap; includes three principal cannabis
species: Cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica and Cannabis ruderalis

CBC See Cannabichromene

CBD See Cannabidiol

CBDA See Cannabidiolic acid

CBG See Cannabigerol

CBGA See Cannabigerolic acid

CBN See Cannabinol

CDSA Canada’s Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
Chemovar a plant variety characterized by its chemical content

Clone an asexually reproduced cannabis plant genetically identical to the plant from which it was
produced

CND Commission on Narcotic Drugs, a subsidiary body of the United Nation’s ECOSOC that
assists the ECOSOC in supervising the application of international drug control treaties

Cole Memo a memorandum published by the DOJ that provides guidance to DOJ attorneys and
federal law enforcement about prosecuting cannabis-related federal offenses

Concentrates a category of consumer cannabis products; any number of concentrated forms of the
active compounds in cannabis; typically an oil or waxlike substance

Conventions three international treaties adopted through the United Nations between 1961 and
1988 that address international regulation of cannabis, cannabis derivatives and many other narcotic,
psychotropic and similar substances (The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961; The
Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971; and The United Nations Convention Against
Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988)

Crumble a form of wax concentrate
CSA Controlled Substances Act
CSE Canadian Securities Exchange

Curing a phase of the cannabis cultivation process during which dried cannabis flower undergoes
controlled fermentation to develop the flower’s aroma, taste and cannabinoid composition

Dab a potent concentrated form of the psychoactive cannabinoid THC

170 © 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA/SIPC

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024806
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026480.txt,"It was initiated in defiance of a longstanding Justice Department presumption against investigating
campaigns in an election year. And while impartiality 1s always required, a 2012 memo by then-
Attorney General Eric Holder emphasizes that impartiality 1s “particularly important in an election
year,” and “politics must play no role in the decisions of federal prosecutors or investigators regarding
any investigations. ... Law enforcement officers and prosecutors may never select the timing of
investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of

giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.”

Strong evidence of a crime can overcome this policy, as was the case with the bureau’s investigation
of Mrs. Clinton’s private email server, which began more than a year before the 2016 election. But
Crossfire was not a criminal investigation. It was a counterintelligence investigation predicated on the
notion that Russia could be colluding with the Trump campaign. There appears to have been no
discernible evidence of Trump-Russia collusion at the time Crossfire was launched, further reinforcing

the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election.

The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But
nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative
therefore hinges on the more generic assertion that Russia aimed to help Mr. Trump’s election, and
that the Trump campaign reciprocated by embracing pro-Russian policies. Yet despite massive
surveillance and investigation, there’s still no public evidence of any such exchange—only that Russia

attempted to sow political discord by undermining Mrs. Clinton and to a lesser extent Mr. Trump.

Some members of the Trump team interacted with Russians and advocated dovish policies. But so did
numerous American political and academic elites, including many Clinton advisers. Presidential
campaigns routinely seek opposition research and interact with foreign powers. The Clinton campaign
funded the Steele dossier, whose British author paid Russians to dish anti-Trump dirt. The Podesta
Group, led by the brother of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign chairman, received millions lobbying for
Russia’s largest bank and the European Center for a Modern Ukraine, both with deep Kremlin ties.

The Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton took millions from Kremlin-connected businesses.

No evidence has emerged of Trump-Russia collusion, and Mr. Mueller has yet to bring collusion-
related charges against anyone. Evidence suggests one of his targets, George Papadopoulos, was lured
to London, plied with the prospect of Russian information damaging to Mrs. Clinton, and taken to
dinner, where he drunkenly bragged that he’d heard about such dirt but never seen it. These
circumstances not only fail to suggest Mr. Papadopoulos committed a crime, they reek of entrapment.

The source of this information, former Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, admits Mr.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026480
"
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012200.txt,"a

JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ.
May 19, 2008
PAGE 3 OF 6

of the guilty plea and sentence no later than October 26, 2007; and (5) the start of the above-
mentioned sentence no later than January 4, 2008.

Furthermore, and significantly, Epstein agreed that he had the burden of ensuring compliance
of the Agreement with the Palm Beach County State Attorney’s Office and the Judge of the 15
Judicial Circuit and “that the failure to do so will be a breach of the agreement” (emphasis added).

Post-Execution of the Agreement

Within weeks of the execution of the Agreement, you sought to delay the entry of Epstein’s
guilty plea and sentence. After the SDFL agreed to accommodate your requést, counse/ for Epstein
began taking issue with the methodology of compensation, notification to the victims, and the issues

that had been previously considered and rejected during negotiations, i.e., that the conduct does not

require registration and the contemplated state and federal statutes have no applicability to the instant
matter. ,

A. Delay.

The Agreement required that “Epstein shall use his best efforts to enter his guilty plea and
be sentenced not later than October 26, 2007. The United States has no objection to Epstein self-
reporting to begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008.” Agreement, pages 4-5,
paragraph | 1 (emphasis added). After the Agreement was executed, the SDFL accommodated your
request to extend the October 26th plea deadline to November 20"" based upon, what seemed to be,
reasonable scheduling conflict issues.' By early November, you represented that the presiding state
court judge would not “stagger the plea and sentencing as contemplated in the Agreement.” Although
the Agreement clearly did not contemplate a staggered “plea and sentencing,” the SDFL again agreed
to accommodate Epstein’s request to appear in state court for plea and sentencing on January 4,
2008.”

t “Accordingly, I have now confirmed with Mr. Epstein's Florida counsel that the state's
attorney's office and the court will be available to have him enter his plea on November 20. So we will
plan to proceed on one that date.” October 18, 2007 email from Jay Lefkowitz to USA R. Alexander
Acosta. °

On the same day, Mr. Lefkowitz confirmed with First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman that this
postponement “ will not affect when Epstein begins serving his sentence.”

Correspondence from Jay Lefkowitz to FAUSA Sloman dated November 8, 2007 (“the judge
has invited the parties to appear for the plea and sentencing on January 4"", we do not anticipate any delay
beyond that date.”)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012200
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030758.txt,"JEE

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030758
"
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023692.txt,"Quest
Means
Business

China's
Xi Jinping
UN Speech

Robert
Lawrence
Kuhn
Interview

September 28, 2015

@RichardQuest

//) LIVE
CHINA'S XI JINPING MAKES FIRST U.N. SPEECH

—

L :
| NA'S XI
a CHI iii

ee —

h

JINPING MAKES FIRST U.N. SPEECH CW)

@RichardQuest

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023692
"
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027946.txt,"Chapter Seven

If you’d visited Tel Aviv in July 1967, you would have sensed a new spirit
of confidence, not cockiness exactly, but a sort of spring in the collective step.
This was not just due to the Six-Day War. It was because the city, if not yet the
rest of the country, had shed the economic austerity of Israel’s first two decades
and was beginning to experience at least some of the consumer comforts which
Western Europe, or America, took for granted. But we were still a decade away
from the first shopping malls, or the upscale cafés and restaurants which
nowadays give places like Dizengoff Street, a few blocks back from the
seafront, the feel of London or Paris on a summer’s day. Television had been
introduced only a year before the war. Color TV was still nearly a decade away.
I can’t say I was surprised to learn, when the archives were opened a few years
ago, that a committee of moral arbiters in our Ministry of Education vetoed
plans for the Beatles to perform in the city. “No intrinsic artistic value,” they
pronounced. “And their concerts provoke mass hysteria.”

Even in Tel Aviv, and certainly the rest of Israel, a kind of cultural austerity
still prevailed, an emphasis on modesty and self-restraint. It was a legacy of
1948, a reflection of the years of shared sacrifice, physical labor, and the life-
and-death struggles which I, like most Israelis at the time, had experienced
within our own lifetimes. That may help explain why I can remember no one
remarking on an aspect of my character which, once I rose to public
prominence, would attract attention, frequent comment, and sometimes
criticism as well: the fact that I seemed so se/f-contained, reluctant to engage
emotionally with people beyond a circle of close friends or confidants. My lack
of smalltalk, and the kind of gladhanding and schmoozing that are the currency
of political life. At the time of the 1967 war, I was not yet a public figure. Yet to
the extent those around me would have taken note — family, university
classmates, sayeret comrades, or officers in the Airya — my slight emotional
aloofness, my focus on simply getting things done, and the way I internalized
setbacks, even tragedies like the death of Nechemia Cohen, was not exceptional.
It was, in many ways, simply Israeli.

Yet as Israel, Israeli society and my place in them changed, it would be
suggested to me more than once — not always kindly, when it was from critics or
rivals — that I had a “touch of Aspbergers” in me, a reference to those on the
more benign reaches of the autism spectrum with a special facility for math,

98
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027946
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016491.txt,"their part, Epstein’s lawyers argued that the lowest designation should be applied because “there
are no real victims here.” Jd. Ex. C.

In January 2011, the judge presiding over the sex-offender registration proceedings,
Justice Ruth Pickholz, rejected ADA Gaffney’s arguments and designated Epstein as a level
three sex offender. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d at 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d at 240. Ata hearing preceding her
ruling, Justice Pickholz told the Assistant District Attorney that she had “never seen the
prosecutor’s office do anything like this” and further stated that she had “done many [cases]
much less troubling than this one where [prosecutors] would never make a downward argument
like this.” Jd. Ex. B. When ADA Gaffney was questioned about whether she knew Epstein had
sexually abused other minors, Gaffney admitted that she had never spoken to the federal
investigators in Florida who had reached the conclusion that Epstein was a serial abuser of
underage girls. Id. Ex. C.

B. The Appeal

Epstein subsequently commenced this Appeal, seeking to overturn the trial court’s ruling
that he is a level three sex offender. The appellate briefs submitted by Epstein and the
Manhattan District Attorney were filed under seal, pursuant to New York Civil Rights Law
section 50-b. /d. 47. That statute protects the anonymity “of any victim of a sex offense” by
requiring any “court file . .. which tends to identify such a victim” to be filed under seal. N.Y.
Civ. Rights Law § 50-b(1). The statute further provides, however, that court documents filed
under seal shall be disclosed if a movant “demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court that good
cause exists for disclosure to that person.” /d. § 50-b(2)(b).

In a decision filed on the public docket (the “Decision’’), this Court affirmed Epstein’s
level three offender status because the lower “court properly relied on highly reliable proof of
criminal conduct for which defendant was neither indicted nor convicted.” Epstein, 89 A.D.3d at

4
4811-3721-9459v 3 3930033-000039

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016491
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030980.txt,"From: J [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 5/29/2019 10:38:12 PM
To: Michael Wolff aS
Subject: Fwd: Wolff Book

the public records show i was the stalking horse in the bankruptcy, not 55 million but I had bid 36 m

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Richard Kahn

Date: Wed, May 29, 2019 at 6:28 PM

Subject: Wolff Book

To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>

iam sure you read attached
articles already on internet..

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/new-book-paints-sordid-picture-of-trump-real-estate-deal-involving-
russian-oligarch-and-jeffrey-epstein/

New book paints sordid picture of Trump real estate
deal involving Russian oligarch and Jeffrey Epstein

President Donald Trump departs the White House for Palm Beach, FL (Shutterstock)
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Flipboard

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030980
"
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017957.txt,"Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 23 of 28

(a) He did have sex with Ms. Ransome.

(b) He was Ms. Ransome’s lawyer.

(c) Ms. Ransome’s statements about her involvement with Dershowitz
preceded any contact with Roberts’ attorneys. For example, Ransome’s first
contact with any of Roberts’ lawyers was in November 2016, and at least as early
as October 2016 Ransome had identified Dershowitz in writing to a reporter as
someone who had had sex with one or more of the girls provided by Epstein and
that Epstein had arranged for Dershowitz to be Ransome’s lawyer.

82. After settling the case against him brought by Messrs. Edwards and Cassell,
Dershowitz told the media he had been vindicated, while at the same time insisting that the term
of the settlement remains confidential. Edwards and Cassell responded: “Following the
announcement of the settlement of defamation claims against Alan Dershowitz, he has been
making public statements suggesting that he has prevailed in the lawsuit and that the terms of the
settlement exonerate him of any wrongdoing. Those statements are at best misleading. It is a
mistake for anyone to conclude based upon Mr. Dershowitz’s statements that the case against
him was abandoned due to lack of factual support. It is a mistake for anyone to conclude based
upon Dershowitz’s statements that Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell had determined that the
allegations against Alan Dershowitz made by Virginia Roberts Giuffre were false or unfounded.
Neither the terms of settlement nor the agreed upon joint public statement issued as part of the
settlement support any such conclusion and it is false to state or suggest otherwise.” Dershowitz
Settles Sex Case, But is He Vindicated? The American Lawyer, April 10, 2016.

83. Dershowitz continues to this day to insist that the terms of his settlement with

Edwards and Cassell remain confidential -- a position that can only be explained by

23

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017957
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031446.txt,"and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031446
"
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031320.txt,"From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]

Sent: 11/21/2017 1:44:04 PM

To: Richard Kahn

Subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
gratitude

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Richard Kahn <9 > wrote:
is gratitude paying for IFP or peggy?
please advise
thank you

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022

-
fax

cell as

Begin forwarded message:

From: Steven Pfeiffer ~
Subject: Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
Date: November 20, 2017 at 8:48:00 PM EST

To: Richard Kahn <j

Hi Richard -

I certainly will. But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this together for the donation.
Jeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied
different information than below.

Please advice how best to proceed.

Best,
Steven

Sent from my iPhone

On Novy 20, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Richard Kahn qq wrote:

please send info tomorrow as i will be out the remainder of the week
thank you

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031320
"
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491.txt,"From: Darren Indyke

Sent: 2/17/2017 7:00:21 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Fwd: update

Importance: — High

Privileged - Redacted

i H
aimee me i ei i i i i i i i i RE i RT Ri RR i 1

DARREN K. INDYKE
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor

BS DS IS IS DIS Ig OIC BIS DIS 2S ik DIC Ig 24S BIS DIS 2S 2k DIS Ik 24S BIC DIS 24S DiC DIC ik DIC BIS DIR 2S 2k DIC IC 24S IS DIS SIC DC DIS IC DIC BIC DIR SIC DIC DIC 2g 34S BIC DIC FIC DC DIC 2g 24S IC DIC SIC DC DIC IC 24S IC OIC 5S 24S DIC 2g 24S IC 24S SIC Df DIC 2g DIC Dk OIC BIC 24g OIC 2k OIC ik 2Ie 2s 2fe 2c 2
Bis fe 3s 2k 2S ig 2k is 2 2s 2 2k

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client

privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication

or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this

communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.

Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2017 Darren K.

Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved.

Be ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee
Bis 2k 3S 2s 2S 2k 246 is 2Ik 2s 2s 2s 2k

Begin forwarded message:
From: Etienne Binant {ii i i iii
Subject: TR: TR: update

Date: February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST
To: Darren Indyke <

Dear Darren
| hope all is well
can you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?

all the best

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025945.txt,"From: Bruce Moskowitz 
Sent: 6/30/2016 6:26:23 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Locate a Clinical Trial Near You - MyClinicalTrialLocator.com 
Importance: High 
Thank you 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Jun 30, 2016, at 2:23 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
sent to biden private 
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Bruce Moskowitz <_______________________________ wrote: 
This is Aaron's website not an app it allows anyone to type in any cancer term and find any clinical trial or 
researcher worldwide. It is updated every 24 hours and is in process of being updated with additional 
information for the benefit of patients and researchers. We allow it as a free open platform that can be 
expanded to specific interests. If for instance you type in glioblastoma and go out 10,000 miles from your 
location you can see researchers and clinical trials worldwide. Look at the map then press for example 
Germany and see what is available. 
http://www.myclinicaltriallocator.com/  
Sent from my iPad 
Bruce Moskowitz M.D. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 025945 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018793.txt,"Las Vegas Retail Via

Overview

The Las Vegas Strip has historically outperformed competitive U.S. retail markets and continues to experience very strong absorption of
new construction, low vacancy rates, and an abundance of retail tenants seeking to access high-traffic pedestrian locations. These factors
together with controlled levels of new development will cause significant long-term rent increases across the submarket.

Increasing Levels of Visitor Spending — More than half of the 41 million visitors to Las Vegas each year spend time shopping along the Las
Vegas Strip. Average per capita visitor spending on shopping, dining and entertainment during 2014 was $815. As demonstrated in the
exhibit below, consumers are allocating a larger percentage of their total spending on shopping and entertainment.

ECONOMIC VISITOR PROFILE 2008 - 2014

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Average number of adults in immediate Party 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4
Proportion of visitors with persons under 21 in their immediate party 6.0% 8.0% 7.0% 10.0% 11.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Proportion of visitors who stayed overnight 99.6% 99.8% 99.3% 99.8% 99.7% 99.8% 99.6%
Days stayed (average) 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.3 4.2
Nights stayed (average) 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.2
Proportion of visitors who stayed in a hotel or motel room 94.0% 96.0% 95.0% 95.0% 96.0% 96.0% 96.0%
Number of room occupants 2.1 2.1 2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1
Lodging expenditures (average per night) $101.68 $75.78 $79.64 $84.04 $93.13 $83.62 $86.55
Proportion of visitors who bought a package or travel group trip 15.0% 15.0% 16.0% 18.0% 14.0% 13.0% 18.0%
Average cost of package per person $746.69 $640.29 $651.02 $757.83 $743.65 $868.24 $815.14
Average trip expenditures of food and drink $273.39 $250.32 $256.82 $274.69 $256.11 $278.95 $281.88
Average trip expenditures for local transportation $59.26 $53.31 $62.87 $64.25 $57.77 $59.68 $68.83
Average trip expenditures for shopping $121.90 $101.97 $122.80 $129.34 $149.29 $140.90 $149.77
Average trip expenditures for shows $51.64 $39.87 $49.28 $47.52 $42.89 $38.45 $47.56
Average trip expenditures for sightseeing $7.12 $5.77 $7.21 $10.24 $9.63 $9.29 $14.49
Average trip gambling budget $531.98 $481.57 $466.20 $447.63 $484.70 $529.57 $530.11

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018793
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012906.txt,"The Webmind Diehards, who helped begin the Novamente project that succeeded Webmind
beginning in 2001: Cassio Pennachin, Stephan Vladimir Bugaj, Takuo Henmi, Matthew
Ikle’, Thiago Maia, Andre Senna, Guilherme Lamacie and Saulo Pinto

Those who helped get the Novamente project off the ground and keep it progressing over the
years, including some of the Webmind Diehards and also Moshe Looks, Bruce Klein, Izabela
Lyon Freire, Chris Poulin, Murilo Queiroz, Predrag Janicic, David Hart, Ari Heljakka, Hugo
Pinto, Deborah Duong, Paul Prueitt, Glenn Tarbox, Nil Geisweiller and Cassio Pennachin
(the co-authors of this book), Sibley Verbeck, Jeff Reed, Pejman Makhfi, Welter Silva,
Lukasz Kaiser and more

All those who have helped with the OpenCog system, including Linas Vepstas, Joel Pitt,
Jared Wigmore / Jade O'Neill, Zhenhua Cai, Deheng Huang, Shujing Ke, Lake Watkins,
Alex van der Peet, Samir Araujo, Fabricio Silva, Yang Ye, Shuo Chen, Michel Drenthe, Ted
Sanders, Gustavo Gama and of course Nil and Cassio again. Tyler Emerson and Eliezer
Yudkowsky, for choosing to have the Singularity Institute for AI (now MIRI) provide seed
funding for OpenCog.

The numerous members of the AGI community who have tossed around AGI ideas with me
since the first AGI conference in 2006, including but definitely not limited to: Stan Franklin,
Juergen Schmidhuber, Marcus Hutter, Kai-Uwe Kuehnberger, Stephen Reed, Blerim Enruli,
Kristinn Thorisson, Joscha Bach, Abram Demski, Itamar Arel, Mark Waser, Randal Koene,
Paul Rosenbloom, Zhongzhi Shi, Steve Omohundro, Bill Hibbard, Eray Ozkural, Brandon
Rohrer, Ben Johnston, John Laird, Shane Legg, Selmer Bringsjord, Anders Sandberg, Alexei
Samsonovich, Wlodek Duch, and more

The inimitable ""Artilect Warrior"" Hugo de Garis, who (when he was working at Xiamen
University) got me started working on AGI in the Orient (and introduced me to my wife
Ruiting in the process). And Changle Zhou, who brought Hugo to Xiamen and generously
shared his brilliant research students with Hugo and me. And Min Jiang, collaborator of
Hugo and Changle, a deep AGI thinker who is helping with OpenCog theory and practice
at time of writing.

Gino Yu, who got me started working on AGI here in Hong Kong, where I am living at time
of writing. As of 2013 the bulk of OpenCog work is occurring in Hong Kong via a research
grant that Gino and I obtained together

e Dan Stoicescu, whose funding helped Novamente through some tough times.
e Jeffrey Epstein, whose visionary funding of my AGI research has helped me through a

number of tight spots over the years. At time of writing, Jeffrey is helping support the
OpenCog Hong Kong project.

Zeger Karssen, founder of Atlantis Press, who conceived the Thinking Machines book series
in which this book appears, and who has been a strong supporter of the AGI conference
series from the beginning

My wonderful wife Ruiting Lian, a source of fantastic amounts of positive energy for me
since we became involved four years ago. Ruiting has listened to me discuss the ideas
contained here time and time again, often with judicious and insightful feedback (as she
is an excellent AI researcher in her own right); and has been wonderfully tolerant of me
diverting numerous evenings and weekends to getting this book finished (as well as to other
AGl-related pursuits). And my parents Ted and Carol and kids Zar, Zeb and Zade, who
have also indulged me in discussions on many of the themes discussed here on countless
occasions! And my dear, departed grandfather Leo Zwell, for getting me started in science.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012906
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029126.txt,"From: Robert Kuhn xa

Sent: 12/31/2017 1:58:32 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)

Importance: — High
After 4 good.

Skype? FaceTime? Phone?

On Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

guest s here until 4. after good

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Robert Kuhn EE wrote:

Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.
Skype? FaceTime? Phone?

On Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
weekend easy

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Robert Kuhn <> wrote:
Terrific; looking forward.

Excited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.

Equally important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -
see below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.

How’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -
mother 102 in May.)

RADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)

Expand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes
1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance
2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories

3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry,
biology [molecular and evolutionary|, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)

4. Power Laws

5. Mathematical Biology

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029126
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026294.txt,"From: 
Sent: 7/29/2018 5:34:28 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: 
Importance: High 
i was told that GCC leaders will meet Trump on or around sep 5 i hope this dispute comes to an endci4 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:35 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
great 
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:25 PM, -11> wrote: 
if you are in NY , maybe i visit in september 
Sent from my iPhone 
On Jul 23, 2018, at 10:57 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
now where is my friend? 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026294 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026295 
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018787.txt,"Gaming Demand Analysis

The win per unit per day (WPUPD) statistic provides the basis for the analysis and projection of table game and gaming device revenues.
WPUPD is calculated by dividing total gaming revenues generated by a particular type of gaming unit by the number of gaming units
available. Overall, the market for gaming devices exhibited high levels of demand and absorption as evidenced by increasing WPUPD and
overall win levels during periods of increasing inventory.

The following exhibit summarizes the strong performance of the Strip gaming market within the industry standard “Casinos earning $72M
and Over”.

LAS VEGAS STRIP $72 MILLION AND OVER GAMING DEVICES

YEAR WIN (000S) % CHANGE UNITS % CHANGE WPUPD % CHANGE
1 1996 $1,442,375 see 37,197 =a $106 see
2 1997 1,486,193 3.0 39,033 4.9 $104 (1.5)
3 1998 1,719,351 15.7 45,078 15.5 $104 0.2
4 1999 1,928,428 12.2 47,962 6.4 $110 5.4
5 2000 2,107,673 or 50,203 4.7 $115 4.1
6 2001 2,055,412 (2.5) 47,175 (6.0) $119 4.1
7 2002 2,111,912 2.7 47,181 0.0 $123 2.7
8 2003 2,160,261 2.3 43,787 (7.2) $135 10.2
9 2004 2,535,568 17.4 44,989 2.7 $154 13.9
10 2005 2,789,933 10.0 43,377 (3.6) $176 14.4
11 2006 3,059,179 9.7 41,753 (3.7) $201 13.9
12 2007 3,142,884 2.7 40,049 (4.1) $215 7.1
13 2008 2,850,965 (9.3) 40,153 0.3 $194 (9.8)
14 2009 2,495,093 (12.5) 39,288 (2.2) $174 (10.3)
15 2010 2,437,193 (2.3) 38,032 (3.2) $176 0.9
16 2011 2,483,244 1.9 36,685 (3.5) $185 5.6
17 2012 2,553,266 2.8 35,452 (3.4) $197 6.1
18 2013 2,593,138 1.6 34,589 (2.4) $205 4.4
19 2014 2,546,721 (1.8) 33,504 (3.1) $208 1.4

Source: Las Vegas Gaming Control Board

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018787
"
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020218.txt,"66

CHAPTER SEVEN

Crossing the Rubicon

“What I came to feel is that a regime that is described as a national security agency has stopped representing the
public interest and has instead begun to protect and promote state security interests. “

--Edward Snowden, interviewed in Moscow 2014

Soon after Snowden failed to get a SES job at the NSA, he intensified his rogue activities. At
that time, Dell was tasked with building an enhanced backup system for the NSA in Hawaii. Deputy
Director Ledgett explained that part of Snowden’s job as a system administrator under contract to Dell was
transferring files held at Fort Meade to back-up computers in Hawaii. He “was moving copies of that
data there for them, which was perfect cover for stealing the [NSA] data.” Snowden took
advantage of this cover.

Snowden expanded his own rogue operation, as Ledgett reconstructed the breach, through the
fall and winter of 2012. There was little risk of him getting caught. The security measures at the
Hawaii base presented no obstacles to him since, as a system administrator, he had privileges that
allowed him to copy documents that had not been encrypted. Indeed, it was part of the process
of building the backup system. The flaw he had pointed to in Japan in which system
administrators working solo could safely steal files also existed in Hawaii. This time, however,
instead of bringing it to the attention of the NSA, he used it to himself steal files. He could be
confident that his 2012 thefts of documents would go undetected because the NSA’s base had not
yet installed an auditing system. Such real-time auditing of the movement of documents, which
was done at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade and most of the NSA’s regional facilities, had not
yet been installed at the Hawaii base because a lack of bandwidth prevented the safe upgrading of
the software. This auditing software was scheduled to be installed after the backup system was
completed in 2013. The Kunia base was one of the last NSA bases which did not monitor
suspicious transfers of files on a real-time basis. Snowden certainly was certainly aware of this
deficiency. He later pointed out in his interview in Wired magazine in Moscow that the NSA base
where he worked did not have an “audit” mechanism. This security gap allowed Snowden, using
his system administrator’s credentials, to copy classified data to a thumb drive without anyone
being able to trace the copied data back to him. And, according to the NSA’s subsequent damage
assessment, he stole many thousands of pages while working for Dell in 2012 before he contacted
journalists. Deputy Director Ledgett subsequently reported that the NSA analysis the 58,000
documents that were given by Snowden to journalists in June 2013 showed that most of them
were taken by Snowden while he was still working at Dell.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020218
"
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033353.txt,"From: Richard Kahn 
Sent: 4/29/2019 9:59:45 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: trump praising dershowitz.. 
Importance: High 
http://www.newshounds.us/trump_attacks fox_judge napolitano opining obstructed_justice deserves impeac 
hment 042819  
Richard Kahn 
HBRK Associates Inc. 
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor 
New York, NY 10022 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033353 
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010732.txt,"Kenneth W. Starr 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
777 South Figueroa Street 
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5800 
May 27, 2008 
Joe D. Whitley 
Alston & Bird LLP 
The Atlantic Building 
950 F Street, NW 
Washington. DC 20004-1404 
VIA FACSIMILE CONFIDENTIAL 
Honorable Mark Filip 
Office of the Deputy Attorney General 
United States Department of Justice 
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20530 
Dear Judge Filip: 
This letter briefly supplements our prior submission to you dated May 19, 2008. In that 
communication, we urgently requested that your Office conduct an independent review of the 
proposed federal prosecution of our client, Jeffrey Epstein. The dual reasons for our request that 
you review this matter are (i) the bedrock need for integrity in the enforcement of federal 
criminal laws, and (ii) the profound questions raised by the unprecedented extension of federal 
law by the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the ""USAO"") to a prominent public figure 
who has close ties to former President Clinton. 
The need for review is now all the more exigent. On Monday, May 19, 2008, First 
Assistant Jeffrey Sloman of the USAO responded to an email from Jay Lefkowitz informing U.S. 
Attorney Alex Acosta that we would be seeking your Office's review. Mr. Sloman's letter, 
which imposed a deadline of June 2, 2008 to comply with all the terms of the current Non-
Prosecution Agreement (the ""Agreement""), plus new unilateral modifications, on pain of being 
deemed in breach of that Agreement, appears to have been deliberately designed to deprive us of 
an adequate opportunity to seek your Office's review in this matter. 
The USAO's desire to foreclose a complete review is understandable, given that the 
Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (""CEOS"") has already determined that our substantive 
arguments regarding why a federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein is not warranted were 
""compelling."" However, in contradiction to Mr. Sloman's assertion that CEOS had provided an 
independent, de novo review, CEOS made clear that it did not do so. Indeed, CEOS declined to 
examine several of the more troubling aspects of the investigation of Mr. Epstein, including the 
deliberate leak to the New York Times of numerous highly confidential aspects of the 
investigation and negotiations between the parties as well as the recent crop of civil lawsuits 
filed against Mr. Epstein by Mr. Sloman's former law partner. 
The unnecessary and arbitrarily imposed deadline set by the USAO was done without any 
respect for the normal functioning and scheduling of state judicial matters. It requires that 
Mr. Epstein's counsel persuade the State Attorney of Palm Beach to issue a criminal information 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 010732 
Honorable Mark Filip 
May 27, 2008 
Page 2 
to a charge that the State Attorney has not, despite a two year investigation, determined to be 
appropriate. Mr. Epstein's counsel must also successfully expedite a plea of guilty to this charge 
on a date prior to July 8, 2008, which is the date presently set by the state court Judge. 
Further, the unnecessary deadline is even more problematic because Mr. Epstein's effort 
to reconcile the state charge and sentence with the terms of the Agreement requires an unusual 
and unprecedented threatened application of federal law. Thus, it places Mr. Epstein in the 
highly unusual position of having to demand that the State acquiesce to a more severe 
punishment than it had already determined was appropriate. 
We have attempted to resolve these and other issues through the USA() and CEOS, 
including raising our concerns about the USAO's inappropriate conduct with respect to this 
matter. But those avenues have now been shut down. Mr. Sloman's letter purports to prohibit 
any further contact between Mr. Epstein's defense team and U.S. Attorney Acosta, and instead 
requires us to communicate with the USA() only though Mr. Sloman's subordinates. 
While it pains us to say this, this misguided prosecution from the outset gives the 
appearance that it may have been politically motivated. Mr. Epstein is a highly successful, self-
made businessman and philanthropist who entered the public arena only by virtue of his close 
personal association with former President Bill Clinton. There is little doubt in our minds that 
the USA() never would have contemplated a prosecution in this case if Mr. Epstein were just 
another ""John."" 
U.S. Attorney Acosta previously has stated that he is ""sympathetic"" to our federalism-
related concerns, but he has taken the position that his authority is limited by enforcement 
policies set forth in Washington, D.C. As expressed in our prior communication to you, we 
believe that a complete and independent appraisal and resolution of this case most appropriately 
would be undertaken by your Office—beginning with the rescission of the arbitrary, unfair, and 
unprecedented deadline that Mr. Sloman demands to have imposed in this case. At the very 
least, we would appreciate a tolling of the arbitrary timeline imposed on our client by the USA() 
in order to allow time for your office to consider our request that you undertake a review of this 
case. 
Thank you for your time and attention. 
Respectfully submitted, 
, Q-1444 
Kenneth W. Starr 
D. Whitley 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP Alston & Bird LL 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 010733 
05/27/2008 12:18 FAX 
II 001 
********************* 
*** TX REPORT *** 
********************* 
TRANSMISSION OK 
TX/RX NO 0439 
RECIPIENT ADDRESS 912025140487 
DESTINATION ID 
ST. TIME 05/27 12:18 
TIME USE 0034 
PAGES SENT 3 
RESULT OK 
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 
Fax Transmittal 
777 South Figueroa Street 
Los Anaeles. California 90017 
Please notify us immediately if any pages arc not received. 
• 
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL, MAY 
BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, MAY CONSTITUTE INSIDE INFORMATION, AND 
IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. UNAUTHORIZED USE, 
DISCLOSURE OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. 
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, 
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT: 
(213) 680-8400. 
To: 
Flonorab14.-! Mark Filip 
Company: 
Office of the Deputy Attorney Cie/len:11 
United States Department of Justice 
From: Date: Pages w/cover 
Kenneth W. Starr May 27, 2008 3 
Fax #: 
Direct #: 
Fax #: Direct #: 
Message: 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 010734 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030463.txt,"When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that “Andy’”—as
Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one
thing’s for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he’s talking about far more than “Andy” does.
Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him.

And Ghislaine?
Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It’s almost impossible not to.

She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I’ve spent hours talking to her about
the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom
of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away
almost anyone else’s I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs’. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for
hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends.

Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party ofher best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known
fondly to her close friends as “the Tennis Goddess”) Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she
really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability.

And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey.

“He saved her,” I remember a close friend of mine telling me. “When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then
Jeffrey took her in. She’s never forgotten that—and never will.”

In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her
father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine’s
father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive “black hole” he’d fraudulently created. To
Ghislaine, Jeffrey’s habits may not have seemed that strange.

In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end
either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid
paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don’t tend to get to the top by being the world’s most
balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn’t quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second
“wife” for many years whose existence he has been open about.

So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven’t spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends
like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she’|] be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one
sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes.

Bis 2fe 2A 24s 2s 2s 24s ois 2fe ois fe 2fs of 2c ois 2fe ois fe of 2s ofc ois 2fe ois fe ois fe 2c ois ofc ois 2fe 2s fe 2c ois 2fe ois 2fe os fe ofc ois 2fe ois 2fe 2s oie 2c ois ofc ois 2fe ois oie 2 ois 2 ok

The information contained in this communication 1s
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and 1s intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of

Jeffrey Epstein

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to Jeevacation@gmail.com , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030463
"
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012912.txt,"xvi Contents

8.7.1 The Puzzle: Why Is It So Hard to Measure Partial Progress Toward

Hii lével AGL? ws euses ames €3 8@9mE S@EWS SUES EREMS EOEws dOEAs eos 157

8.7.2 A Possible Answer: Cognitive Synergy is Tricky!...................... 158
8.7.38 Conclusion ......... 000.0 teeta 159

9 General Intelligence in the Everyday Human World ...................... 161
O21 Jntreduction, a:as vacms se3ms Sa M2 Sh EMT SE EMERG SERS CREWE SETHE SG EWE GREE See 161
9.2 Some Broad Properties of the Everyday World That Help Structure Intelligence 162
9.3 Embodied Communication..........0.0..0 00000 eee 163
9.3.1 Generalizing the Embodied Communication Prior .................... 166

GA Naive: PRYSIES ws cuews cuews mews (mews Ca Swe wS Ewe WS MEWS EME ws EME wS KEE Lom 166
9.4.1 Objects, Natural Units and Natural Kinds .......................-.. 167
9.4.2 Events, Processes and Causality ........... 00... c cece ee eee 168
9.4.3 Stuffs, States of Matter, Qualities....... 0... 0. eee eee eee eee 168
9.4.4 Surfaces, Limits, Boundaries, Media .......... 0.0.0.0 cece eee eee eee 168
9.4.5 What Kind of Physics Is Needed to Foster Human-like Intelligence?..... 169

9.5 Folk Psychology ........ 0... 00. eee e nee tenes 170
9.5.1 Motivation, Requiredness, Value ......... 00.00 cece cee eee eee eee 171

9.6 Body and Mind .......... 0... cece eee eet een eee 171
9.6.1 The Human Sensorium........... 2000000 c eect eee eee 171
9.6.2 The Human Body’s Multiple Intelligences ......................00005 172

9.7 The Extended Mind and Body ........... 0.0.0.0 c eee eee 176
9.8 Conclusion ......... 000.0 ett eee teens 176
10 A Mind-World Correspondence Principle ...........................022055 177
10.1 Introduction ..........0 0.00 teens 177
10.2 What Might a General Theory of General Intelligence Look Like? ............ 178
10.3 Steps Toward A (Formal) General Theory of General Intelligence ............. 179
10.4 The Mind-World Correspondence Principle ................00 00022 eee eee 180
10.5 How Might the Mind-World Correspondence Principle Be Useful? ............ 181
10.6 Conclusion ........00..0 0002 ct teeta 182

Section III Cognitive and Ethical Development

11 Stages of Cognitive Development ...............00. 0.00 eee eee 187
11.1 Introduction»... 0.0... ee en eee e eens 187
11.2 Piagetan Stages in the Context of a General Systems Theory of Development .. 188
11.3 Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development .............. 0.0... c eee ee eee 188

11.3.1 Perry’s Stages... 0.00. eee teen eee eee 192
11.3.2 Keeping Continuity in Mind .............. 00.0. eee eee eee 192
11.4 Piaget’s Stages in the Context of Uncertain Inference ....................005 193
11.4.1 The Infantile Stage .... 0... eee eee 195
11.4.2 The Concrete Stage.... 00... ee eet eee eee 196
11.4.8 The Formal Stage .......0.. 0.0 eee eee eee 200
114.4 ‘The Réflexivé Sta@¢ s cascs ewe cs es caw eeiws eeews EME ws EME wE EEE Oo 202

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012912
"
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026280.txt,"From: Kathy Ruemmler 
Sent: 6/23/2018 5:11:45 PM 
To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: 
1 
Importance: High 
Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court would find a due process 
violation on these facts. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not apply. 
On Jun 23, 2018, at 12:01 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
i htink weak thoughts? 
----------Forwarded message---------- 
From: Steve Bannon 
Date: Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM 
Subject: Fwd: Re: 
To: ""jeevacation@gmail.com"" <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
Big deal 
Begin forwarded message: 
Resent-From: 
From: ""Rivkin, David"" 
Date: June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT 
To: Steve Bannon -_______ 
Subject: Fwd: Re: 
Here it is. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: ""Grossman, Andrew M"" 
Date: June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT 
To: ""Rivkin, David"" <I_________________________ 
Subject: Re: 
> 
Mueller's Fruit of the Poisonous Tree 
It makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that 
attended its origin in 2016. 
By 
David B. Rivkin Jr. and 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026280 
Elizabeth Price Foley 
June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET 
414  COMMENTS 
Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation may face a serious legal obstacle: It is tainted by 
antecedent political bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department's 
inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communications, the report says, were ""not only indicative of a 
biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take action to impact a presidential candidate's electoral 
prospects."" Although Mr. Horowitz could not definitively ascertain whether this bias ""directly 
affected"" specific FBI actions in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, it nonetheless affects the 
legality of the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry, code-named Crossfire Hurricane. 
Crossfire was launched only months before the 2016 election. Its FBI progenitors—the same ones who 
had investigated Mrs. Clinton—deployed at least one informant to probe Trump campaign advisers, 
obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court wiretap warrants, issued national security letters to 
gather records, and unmasked the identities of campaign officials who were surveilled. They also 
repeatedly leaked investigative information. 
Mr. Horowitz is separately scrutinizing Crossfire and isn't expected to finish for months. But the 
current report reveals that FBI officials displayed not merely an appearance of bias against Donald 
Trump, but animus bordering on hatred. Peter Strzok, who led both the Clinton and Trump 
investigations, confidently assuaged a colleague's fear that Mr. Trump would become president: ""No 
he won't. We'll stop it."" An unnamed FBI lawyer assigned to Crossfire told a colleague he was 
""devastated"" and ""numb"" after Mr. Trump won, while declaring to another FBI attorney: ""Viva le 
resistance."" 
The report highlights the FBI's failure to act promptly upon discovering that Anthony Weiner's laptop 
contained thousands of Mrs. Clinton's emails. Investigators justified the delay by citing the ""higher 
priority"" of Crossfire. But Mr. Horowitz writes: ""We did not have confidence that Strzok's decision to 
prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on [the] investigative lead discovered on the 
Weiner laptop was free from bias."" 
Similarly, although Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that then-FBI Director James Comey was trying 
to influence the election, Mr. Comey did make decisions based on political considerations. He told the 
inspector general that his election-eve decision to reopen the Clinton email investigation was motivated 
by a desire to protect her assumed presidency's legitimacy. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026281 
The inspector general wrote that Mr. Strzok's text messages ""created the appearance that investigative 
decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations."" The report adds, importantly, that ""most 
of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation."" Given how biases 
ineluctably shape behavior, these facts create a strong inference that by squelching the Clinton 
investigation and building a narrative of Trump-Russia collusion, a group of government officials 
sought to bolster Mrs. Clinton's electoral chances and, if the unthinkable happened, obtain an insurance 
policy to cripple the Trump administration with accusations of illegitimacy. 
What does this have to do with Mr. Mueller, who was appointed in May 2017 after President Trump 
fired Mr. Comey? The inspector general concludes that the pervasive bias ""cast a cloud over the FBI 
investigations to which these employees were assigned,"" including Crossfire. And if Crossfire was 
politically motivated, then its culmination, the appointment of a special counsel, inherited the taint. All 
special-counsel activities—investigations, plea deals, subpoenas, reports, indictments and 
convictions—are fruit of a poisonous tree, byproducts of a violation of due process. That Mr. Mueller 
and his staff had nothing to do with Crossfire's origin offers no cure. 
When the government deprives a person of life, liberty or property, it is required to use fundamentally 
fair processes. The Supreme Court has made clear that when governmental action ""shocks the 
conscience,"" it violates due process. Such conduct includes investigative or prosecutorial efforts that 
appear, under the totality of the circumstances, to be motivated by corruption, bias or entrapment. 
In U.S. v. Russell (1973), the justices observed: ""We may someday be presented with a situation in 
which the conduct of law enforcement agents is so outrageous that due process principles would 
absolutely bar the government from invoking judicial processes to obtain a conviction."" It didn't take 
long. In Blackledge v. Perry (1974), the court concluded that due process was offended by a 
prosecutor's ""realistic likelihood of 'vindictiveness' "" that tainted the ""very initiation of proceedings."" 
In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have ""power to 
employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual. . . we must have assurance 
that those who would wield this power will be guided solely by their sense of public responsibility for 
the attainment of justice."" Prosecutors must be ""disinterested"" and make ""dispassionate assessments,"" 
free from any personal bias. 
In Williams v. Pennsylvania (2016), the court held that a state judge's potential bias violated due 
process because he had played a role, a quarter-century earlier, in prosecuting the death-row inmate 
whose habeas corpus petition he was hearing. The passage of time and involvement of others do not 
vitiate the taint but heighten ""the need for objective rules preventing the operation of bias that might 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026282 
otherwise be obscured,"" the justices wrote. A single biased individual ""might still have an influence 
that, while not so visible . . . is nevertheless significant."" 
In addition to the numerous anti-Trump messages uncovered by the inspector general, there is a strong 
circumstantial case—including personnel, timing, methods and the absence of evidence—that Crossfire 
was initiated for political, not national-security, purposes. 
It was initiated in defiance of a longstanding Justice Department presumption against investigating 
campaigns in an election year. And while impartiality is always required, a 2012 memo by then-
Attorney General Eric Holder emphasizes that impartiality is ""particularly important in an election 
year,"" and ""politics must play no role in the decisions of federal prosecutors or investigators regarding 
any investigations. . . . Law enforcement officers and prosecutors may never select the timing of 
investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of 
giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party."" 
Strong evidence of a crime can overcome this policy, as was the case with the bureau's investigation of 
Mrs. Clinton's private email server, which began more than a year before the 2016 election. But 
Crossfire was not a criminal investigation. It was a counterintelligence investigation predicated on the 
notion that Russia could be colluding with the Trump campaign. There appears to have been no 
discernible evidence of Trump-Russia collusion at the time Crossfire was launched, further reinforcing 
the notion that it was initiated ""for the purpose"" of affecting the presidential election. 
The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee's servers. But 
nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative 
therefore hinges on the more generic assertion that Russia aimed to help Mr. Trump's election, and that 
the Trump campaign reciprocated by embracing pro-Russian policies. Yet despite massive surveillance 
and investigation, there's still no public evidence of any such exchange—only that Russia attempted to 
sow political discord by undermining Mrs. Clinton and to a lesser extent Mr. Trump. 
Some members of the Trump team interacted with Russians and advocated dovish policies. But so did 
numerous American political and academic elites, including many Clinton advisers. Presidential 
campaigns routinely seek opposition research and interact with foreign powers. The Clinton campaign 
funded the Steele dossier, whose British author paid Russians to dish anti-Trump dirt. The Podesta 
Group, led by the brother of Mrs. Clinton's campaign chairman, received millions lobbying for 
Russia's largest bank and the European Center for a Modern Ukraine, both with deep Kremlin ties. The 
Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton took millions from Kremlin-connected businesses. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026283 
No evidence has emerged of Trump-Russia collusion, and Mr. Mueller has yet to bring collusion-
related charges against anyone. Evidence suggests one of his targets, George Papadopoulos, was lured 
to London, plied with the prospect of Russian information damaging to Mrs. Clinton, and taken to 
dinner, where he drunkenly bragged that he'd heard about such dirt but never seen it. These 
circumstances not only fail to suggest Mr. Papadopoulos committed a crime, they reek of entrapment. 
The source of this information, former Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, admits Mr. 
Papadopolous never mentioned emails, destroying any reasonable inference of a connection between 
the DNC hack and the Trump campaign. 
Crossfire's progenitors thus ignored an obvious question: If Russia promised unspecified dirt on Mrs. 
Clinton but never delivered it, how would that amount to collusion with the Trump campaign? If 
anything, such behavior suggests an attempt to entice and potentially embarrass Mr. Trump by 
dangling the prospect of compromising information and getting his aides to jump at it. 
Given the paucity of evidence, it's staggering that the FBI would initiate a counterintelligence 
investigation, led by politically biased staff, amid a presidential campaign. The aggressive methods and 
subsequent leaking only strengthen that conclusion. If the FBI sincerely believed Trump associates 
were Russian targets or agents, the proper response would have been to inform Mr. Trump so that he 
could protect his campaign and the country. 
Mr. Trump's critics argue that the claim of political bias is belied by the fact that Crossfire was not 
leaked before the election. In fact, there were vigorous, successful pre-election efforts to publicize the 
Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire's launch, CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. 
Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons embarked 
on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington. 
On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times published a letter to Mr. Comey from Senate Minority Leader 
Harry Reid, saying he'd learned of ""evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government 
and Donald Trump's presidential campaign,"" which had ""employed a number of individuals with 
significant and disturbing ties to Russia and the Kremlin."" On Aug. 30, the ranking Democratic 
members of four House committees wrote a public letter to Mr. Comey requesting ""that the FBI assess 
whether connections between Trump campaign officials and Russian interests"" may have contributed 
to the DNC hack so as ""to interfere with the U.S. presidential election."" On Sept. 23, Yahoo News's 
Michael Isikoff reported the Hill briefings and the Steele dossier's allegations regarding Carter Page. 
On Oct. 30, Harry Reid again publicly wrote Mr. Comey: ""In my communications with you and other 
top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026284 
information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian 
government."" 
That these leaking efforts failed to prevent Mr. Trump's victory, or that Mr. Comey's ham-fisted 
interventions might have also hurt Mrs. Clinton's electoral prospects, does not diminish the legal 
significance of the anti-Trump bias shown by government officials. 
The totality of the circumstances creates the appearance that Crossfire was politically motivated. Since 
an attempt by federal law enforcement to influence a presidential election ""shocks the conscience,"" any 
prosecutorial effort derived from such an outrageous abuse of power must be suppressed. The public 
will learn more once the inspector general finishes his investigation into Crossfire's genesis. But given 
what is now known, due process demands, at a minimum, that the special counsel's activity be paused. 
Those affected by Mr. Mueller's investigation could litigate such an argument in court. One would 
hope, however, that given the facts either Mr. Mueller himself or Deputy Attorney General Rod 
Rosenstein would do it first. 
Mr. Rivkin and Ms. Foley practice appellate and constitutional law in Washington. He served at the 
Justice Department and the White House Counsel's Office during the Reagan and George H.W. Bush 
administrations. She is a professor at Florida International University College of Law. 
Appeared in the June 23, 2018, print edition. 
Best, 
Andrew 
Andrew Grossman 
Partner 
<image001.png> 
Washington Square 
1050 Connecticut Ave, N.W. I Suite 1100 
Washington, DC 20036-5304 
bakerlaw.com 
<image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026285 
From: ""Rivkin, David"" < 
Date: Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM 
To: ""Grossman, Andrew M"" 
Subject: <no subject> 
Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx 
Sent from my iPhone 
This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended 
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying 
or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately 
by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content 
of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein 
and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a 
complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities. 
Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of 
inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, 
we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are 
present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result 
of e-mail transmission. 
please note 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
JEE 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026286 
"
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029132.txt,"Expand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes
1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance
2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories

3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry,
biology [molecular and evolutionary|, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)

4. Power Laws
5. Mathematical Biology

6. Foundations of Mathematics / Philosophy/Meaning of Math (discovered/invented?)

ADD/Exchange to Biological Breakthrough episodes

9/10. Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability
in biomedical and psychological research - the scandal in recent years.

In the non-Closer To Truth world....

Did CNN Intl this morning on Trump’s China-oil-N.Korea-cheating tweet “Caught RED HANDED...”
[pun deliberate? ]

My favorite fun lines (there are so many) in Trump's NYTimes spontaneous interview.

2) “T like very much President Xi. He treated me better than anybody’s ever been treated in the history of
China.”

Ever (~5,000 year history)
1) “T know the details of taxes better than anybody — better than the greatest CPA.”
Not, mind you, CPAs in general, not even smart Jewish CPAs who work all the time - but whoever, out

of 664,532 actively licensed CPAs (2016), is the greatest CPA of them all (#1 in citing code? creative
deductions?) - better than him!

On Dec 29, 2017, at 6:19 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

lets talk today. I went through the candidates in math. . we should talk , I have great hopes for this and
am sure you woudl want to get it right though some of the math people write well , their speakinn style
and presence is less than A , and probaby closertoaC+/ . Im around today or hte weekend if you would
like to chat.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029132
"
